alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Oscar DIAZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant, Appellee.

No. 02-1399.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Jan. 24, 2003.

Oscar Diaz on brief pro se.

Michael J. Sullivan, United States Attorney, and Nancy Rue, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief, for appellee.

Before SELYA, LYNCH and HOWARD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon de novo review of the district court judgment in light of the parties’ arguments and the record on appeal, we *affirm*the summary judgment substantially for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s report of December 20, 2001 and the district judge’s order of February 7, 2002. Appellant’s additional assignments of error relating to the *in camera*inspection of the tape recording and proof of its authenticity, and the court’s interpretation of appellant’s pleading, are merit-less.

Appellant’s letter motion requesting a copy of the tape recording is dismissed as *moot.*

*Affirmed.*
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 18-0974

Filed September 25, 2019

JORDAN R. HOLM,

Applicant-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF IOWA,

Respondent-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Lars G. Anderson, 

Judge.

Jordan Holm appeals the denial of his application for postconviction relief. 

AFFIRMED.

Kent A. Simmons, Bettendorf, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Sheryl Soich, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee State.

Considered by Potterfield, P.J., and Mullins and Greer, JJ.
2

GREER, Judge.

Jordan Holm appeals the denial of his application for postconviction relief 

(PCR). Following a bench trial in 2003, he was convicted of sexual abuse in the 

third degree. See Iowa Code § 709.4 (2001). We affirmed his conviction on direct 

appeal. See State v. Holm, No. 03-1906, 2005 WL 3477935, at *7 (Iowa Ct. App. 

Dec. 21, 2005). Holm then filed an application for PCR. The district court held trial 

on his application and denied it in full.

On appeal, Holm argues his trial counsel was ineffective for advising him to 

waive his jury trial, failing to offer character evidence, and failing to properly 

investigate and present DNA evidence. He also argues his trial counsel had a 

conflict of interest, which requires us to presume prejudice on his ineffectiveassistance claims. See State v. Smitherman, 733 N.W.2d 341, 346 (Iowa 2007).

In a thorough and well-reasoned opinion, the district court rejected his conflict-ofinterest claim, finding his arguments “circular” and insufficient to prove “the 

existence of a conflict.” The court also found his “waiver of jury trial was knowing 

and voluntary and . . . was supported by legitimate strategic considerations”; his 

character evidence “would not have been admissible at his criminal trial” and, even 

if it were admissible, he did not show “a reasonable likelihood that the outcome of 

trial would have been different”; and his DNA evidence, if admissible, “would not 

have had a substantial likelihood of changing the outcome.” On our de novo 
3

review,1 we agree with the detailed ruling of the district court, and we affirm without 

further opinion. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(1)(b), (d), (e). 

AFFIRMED.

 

1 We review constitutional claims from a PCR proceeding de novo. See Diaz v. State, 896 

N.W.2d 723, 727 (Iowa 2017).
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
   
 /s/ KMJ | Corbin & Company LLPKMJ | Corbin & Company LLP
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4336-4337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01135]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. 1315]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Invizyne 
Technologies, Inc.

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Invizyne Technologies, Inc. has applied to be registered as a 
bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer 
to Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may submit electronic comments on or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before 
March 25, 2024. Such persons may also file a written request for a 
hearing on the application on or before March 25, 2024.

ADDRESSES: The Drug Enforcement Administration requires that all 
comments be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal, which provides the ability to type short comments directly into 
the comment field on the web page or attach a file for lengthier 
comments. Please go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the 
online instructions at that site for submitting comments. Upon 
submission of your comment, you will receive a

[[Page 4337]]

Comment Tracking Number. Please be aware that submitted comments are 
not instantaneously available for public view on https://www.regulations.gov. If you have received a Comment Tracking Number, 
your comment has been successfully submitted and there is no need to 
resubmit the same comment.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this 
is notice that on November 17, 2023, Invizyne Technologies, Inc., 750 
Royal Oaks Drive, Suite 106, Monrovia, California 91016-6357, applied 
to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic 
class(es) of controlled substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
          Controlled substance             code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tetrahydrocannabinols...................    7370  I
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to bulk manufacture the listed controlled 
substance for the internal use intermediates or for sale to its 
customers. In reference to drug code 7370 (Tetrahydrocannabinols), the 
company plans to bulk manufacture this drug as synthetic. No other 
activities for this drug code is authorized for this registration.

Claude Redd,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2024-01135 Filed 1-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1744 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1744

   To permit duty free treatment for certain structures, parts, and 
            components used in the Gemini Telescope Project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 1996

 Mr. Inouye (for himself and Mr. Akaka) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To permit duty free treatment for certain structures, parts, and 
            components used in the Gemini Telescope Project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN STRUCTURES, PARTS AND COMPONENTS USED IN THE GEMINI 
              TELESCOPES PROJECT, MAUNA KEA, HAWAII.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and 
directed to admit free of duty after March 31, 1997, the following 
articles for the use of the Association of Universities for Research in 
Astronomy, Inc. in the construction of the Gemini North Telescope, 
Mauna Kea, Hawaii, as part of the international Gemini 8-Meter 
Telescopes Project:
            (1) The telescope enclosure, produced by Coast Steel 
        Fabricators, Ltd., Port Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada.
            (2) The telescope structure assemblies, produced by G.I.E. 
        Telas, Cannes le Bocca, France.
            (3) The telescope mirror coating plant, produced by the 
        Royal Greenwich Observatories, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
            (4) The telescope primary mirror, polished by REOSC, Saint-
        Pierre-du-Perray, France.
            (5) The telescope secondary mirror, produced by Carl Zeiss, 
        Oberkochen, Germany.
            (6) The telescope acquisition, guiding, and wavefront 
        sensing equipment, produced by the Royal Greenwich 
        Observatories, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
    (b) Reliquidation.--If the liquidation of the entry of any article 
described in subsection (a) has become final before April 1, 1997, the 
entry shall, notwithstanding any other provision of law, be 
reliquidated on April 1, 1997, in accordance with the provisions of 
this section and the appropriate refund of duty made at the time of 
such reliquidation.
                                 <all>
```
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Cutter Enterprises, LLC ) ) Under ContractNo. W912TF-14-D-0513 )
APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60984

PeterJ. Martin, Esq. Timothy T. Corey, Esq.

Hinckley, Allen & Snyder, LLP Hartford, CT Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ David H. Stem, JA

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL By letter dated 6 January 2017, appellant appealed from a contracting officer's letter purporting to be a final decision, which the Board docketed as ASBCA No. 60984. By motion dated 26 January 2017, the government moved to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, alleging that appellant failed to file a claim with the contracting officer. By letter dated 17 February 2017, appellant informed the Boardthat the contracting officer's 13 October 2016 decision had been withdrawn, and that appellant wished to withdraw its appeal "withoutprejudice and with a full reservation ofrights." The government does not objectto appellant's request. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice. Dated: 28 March 2017

# ///~:~--·· 'MARK N. STEMPLER:

Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA No. 60984, Appeal ofCutter Enterprises, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 27, 2019

No. 04-18-00988-CR

Francisco L. ROBLES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR4228

Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the opinion issued this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Appellant’s 

motion filed February 19, 2019 is DENIED AS MOOT.

It is so ORDERED on March 27, 2019.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of March, 2019.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTEE
    April 15, 2009
    
    By /s/ Gary T. Wescombe
    
    Chairman of the TrusteesDate
    
    Gary T. Wescombe
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Healthcare Decision Making.                    

*Date:*                         January 30, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kimberly Firth, Ph.D., National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7702,                         *firthkm@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 10, 2024. 

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-00671 Filed 1-12-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 10.32
                              Suburban Lodges, Inc.

A deed to secure debt and security agreement, mortgage, deed of trust or similar
instrument with Finova Realty Capital Inc. with  substantially the same terms as
Exhibit  10.24 to the  Company's  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999 for each of the following  properties are not being separately
filed:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    PROPERTY NAME                        ADDRESS                       CITY, STATE
<S>                                     <C>                            <C>
Group 6

Suburban Lodge - Hazlewood              9067 Dunn Road                 Hazelwood, MO
Suburban Lodge - St. Charles            1769 Fairlane Dr.              St. Charles, MO
Suburban Lodge - East Indianapolis      2301 Post Dr.                  Indianapolis, IN
Suburban Lodge - Newport News           12015 Jefferson Ave.           Newport News, VA
Suburban Lodge - Jackson, Miss.         5731 I-55 N                    Jackson, MS
</TABLE>
NOV, 8, ;!010 3;5?PM 

^ 

F A A REGIONAL COUNSEL, AEA- ? 

- •'--^PORTAT ON 

NO, 2645 P. 2 

nr v. 

5 p U^UO 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINBTRATTON 

OFHCE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D,C 

In tha Mansr of CaxoUDA Blofi Air, UX: 

CaseNo.CPlOEAOOlO 

Judge Yod«T ^p^bio-ocjig^ 

The Federal Avlanoa AdrmnistiBtlon (FAA)» by counsel* hereby files its Propofled 

Pzocedml Schedule as Mows: 

Filing stipulatioas, a list of vvltnesses and a suaimazy of their propoaed tefidmooy >- No 

later lius. Jauuaiy 7,2011 

ExohttDgiiig exbibils and dlscoveiy -N o kti^ than Felmutfy 7, ^1 L 

Proposed Hearing Site: Richmond, VA 

HrVNOTllTH 

swo * VVJ 

•gnieetsos xvj ss:9i oLosmm 
''' ' 9.201 0 3:57PM F 

^ A miom coma, AEA^ 

NO. 2545 p, 3 

To date, the parties have not beeaabl 

AatpoMibiliya,^,^^^^ ^ 

^"P««fi% submitted, 

Alfit^R. Johnson, Jr 

^gional Counsel 

Iota reach a setacmew but 

areopeato c^loiingSy: 

Attorney 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

718 553-3258 

718 995-5699 

Concur; 

fl^/ro 

Rcpresenlaiive for Carolina Blue Air, 

LLC 

£oo/£;ool2l 

600/2000 SHQ <-

MTWMftrinT,., 

VVd StLSeetSOS XVd 3S:S L 0L0S/8L/U 
n/18/201 0 15;5G FAX 2024935U2 FAA + DMS 21003/003 

CERTTFTCATE OF SERVICE -

I hereby certify that on this day copies of the foregoing Joint Proposed ProceduraJ 

Schedule were sent via facsimile and first class mail to the following: 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room E12-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

FAX: (202)366-7536 

Eugene A. McDonough 

President, Million Air Richmond 

400 Portugee Road 

Richmond International Airport 

Richmond. VA 23250-2417 

FAX: (804)222-4044 

I hereby certify that on this day a copy of the foregoing Joint Proposed Procedural 

Schedule was sent via first class mtul to the following: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 

Date: NOV I 0 m ) ^-- ^ 

h Hooks 

Paralegal Specialist 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                      SUBSIDIARIES OF POST PROPERTIES, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
          Name                                               Incorporation
          ----                                               -------------
<S>       <C>                                                <C>
1.        Post Apartment Homes, L.P.                           Georgia
2.        Post Services, Inc.                                  Georgia
3.        Post LP Holdings, Inc.                               Georgia
4.        Post GP Holdings, Inc.                               Georgia
5.        Post Travel, Inc.                                    Georgia
6.        Post Landscape Group                                 Georgia
7.        RAM Partners, Inc.                                   Georgia
8.        Post Asset Management, Inc.                          Georgia
9.        Rocky Point Management, Inc.                         Georgia
10.       Cumberland Lake, Inc.                                Georgia
11.       Briarcliff Commercial Property, LLC                  Georgia
12.       Armada Homes, Inc.                                   Delaware
13.       Post Development Services
          Limited Partnership                                  Georgia
14.       Addison Circle Access, Inc.                          Delaware
15.       Akard-McKinney Investment
          Company, LLC                                         Texas
16.       Post Uptown, LLC                                     Texas
17.       Greenwood Residential, LLC                           Texas
18.       Columbus Management Services, LLC                    Texas
19.       Uptown Denver, LLC                                   Columbus
20.       Addison Circle One, Ltd.                             Texas
21.       Addison Circle Two, Ltd.                             Texas
22.       Post Rice Lofts, LLC                                 Texas
23.       Rice Lofts, L.P.                                     Texas
24.       Post-AmerUs Rice Lofts, L.P.                         Georgia
25.       Post-AmerUs American Beauty Mill, L.P.               Georgia
26.       Post Aviation, LLC                                   Georgia
27.       Villas at Parkway Village, L.P.                      Georgia
28.       Villas GP, LLC                                       Georgia
29.       Post-AmerUs Bennie Dillon, L.P.                      Georgia
30.       Miller-Post Development Group, LLC                   Georgia
31.       Post-AmerUs Wilson Building, L.P.                    Georgia
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,523
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,149
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,665
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,810,735
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,871,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    100,000
<COMMON>                                           399
<OTHER-SE>                                     760,179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,871,145
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               241,614
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  175,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 80,420
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  9,001
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    71,419
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.68
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY,

Petitioner

v.

JAMES SMITH (WORKERS' 

COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD),

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 35 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.