alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-15-00315-CR 

________________

BEULAH LEE JOHNSON, Appellant 

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 14-20109 

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 27, 2015, the trial court sentenced Beulah Johnson on a conviction 

for credit card abuse. Johnson filed a notice of appeal on August 5, 2015. The 

district clerk has provided the trial court’s certification to the Court of Appeals. 

The trial court certified that this is a plea-bargain case and the defendant has no 

right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On August 12, 2015, we notified the parties that we would dismiss the 

appeal unless the appellant established grounds for continuing the appeal. Johnson
2

filed a response but failed to establish that the trial court’s certification should be 

amended. Because the record does not contain a certification that shows the 

defendant has the right of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

25.2(d). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________

 CHARLES KREGER

 Justice

 

Submitted on August 28, 2015

Opinion Delivered August 31, 2015

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1612

To provide for increased mandatory minimum sentences for criminals

possessing firearms, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 13, 1996

Mr. HELMS (for himself, Mr. DOLE, Mr. HATCH, Mr. THURMOND, Mr.

FAIRCLOTH, Mr. GRAMM, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide for increased mandatory minimum sentences for

criminals possessing firearms, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASED MANDATORY MINIMUM SEN4 TENCES FOR CRIMINALS POSSESSING FIRE5 ARMS.

6 Section 924(c)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is

7 amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(c)(1)(A) Except to the extent a greater minimum

9 sentence is otherwise provided by any other provision of

10 this subsection or any other law, a person who, during
2

•S 1612 IS

1 and in relation to any crime of violence or drug trafficking

2 crime (including a crime of violence or drug trafficking

3 crime which provides for an enhanced punishment if com4 mitted by the use of a deadly or dangerous weapon or de5 vice) for which a person may be prosecuted in a court of

6 the United States, possesses a firearm shall, in addition

7 to the punishment provided for such crime of violence or

8 drug trafficking crime—

9 ‘‘(i) be punished by imprisonment for not less

10 than 10 years;

11 ‘‘(ii) if the firearm is discharged, be punished

12 by imprisonment for not less than 20 years; and

13 ‘‘(iii) if the death of a person results, be pun14 ished by the death penalty or by imprisonment for

15 not less than life.

16 ‘‘(B) If the firearm possessed by a person convicted

17 under this subsection is a machinegun or a destructive de18 vice, or is equipped with a firearm silencer or firearm muf19 fler, such person shall be sentenced to imprisonment for

20 not less than 30 years.

21 ‘‘(C) In the case of a second or subsequent conviction

22 under this subsection, such person shall be sentenced to

23 imprisonment for not less than 25 years, and if the fire24 arm is a machinegun or a destructive device, or is
3

•S 1612 IS

1 equipped with a firearm silencer or firearm muffler, to life

2 imprisonment without release.

3 ‘‘(D) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the

4 court shall not place on probation or suspend the sentence

5 of any person convicted of a violation of this subsection,

6 nor shall the term of imprisonment imposed under this

7 subsection run concurrently with any other term of impris8 onment including that imposed for the crime of violence

9 or drug trafficking crime in which the firearm was pos10 sessed.’’.

Æ
_______________________________________ __ 

## ___________________ ________________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## September 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, 

## 135787(79) J ustices



## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 135787 v COA: 277905 Wayne CC: 06-008116 LINCOLN WATKINS, Defendant-Appellant.

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plai ntiff-appellee for extension to September 11, 2008 of the time for filing thei r brief on appeal is considered and it is GRANTED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 25, 2008

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1588 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1588

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
 documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel KALYPSO.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as 
applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsements for employment in the coastwise trade for the 
vessel KALYPSO (vessel number 566349).

            Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1588

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
 documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel KALYPSO.
```
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1536

To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit Federal firearms licensees

to conduct firearms business with other such licensees at out-of-State

gun shows.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26, 1996

Mr. THOMPSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit Federal

firearms licensees to conduct firearms business with

other such licensees at out-of-State gun shows.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY OF FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENS4 EES TO CONDUCT FIREARMS BUSINESS WITH

5 OTHER SUCH LICENSEES AT OUT-OF-STATE

6 GUN SHOWS.

7 Section 923(j) of title 18, United States Code, is

8 amended by inserting after the first sentence the follow9 ing: ‘‘Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, a licensee
2

•S 1536 IS

1 may conduct firearms business with another licensee at

2 such a gun show or event without regard to whether the

3 gun show or event is located in the State specified on the

4 license of either licensee.’’.

Æ
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1588

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel KALYPSO.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 with appropriate endorsements for employment in the

9 coastwise trade for the vessel KALYPSO (vessel number

10 566349).

Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1588

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

KALYPSO.wise trade endorsement for the vesselissue a certificate of documentation and coast-
Exhibit 31.2
 Certifications for Form 10-Q
             Date: November 19, 2008
    
    Name:
    
    /s/ Daniel L. EricksonTitle:
    
    Executive Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1209

CURLEE SHERMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District

Judge. (CA-03-3712-5-24BC)

Submitted: June 25, 2004 Decided: July 19, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curlee Sherman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Curlee Sherman seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint alleging claims under Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388

(1971). The district court referred this case to a magistrate

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate

judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Sherman that

failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could

waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the

recommendation. Despite this warning, Sherman failed to object to

the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of

the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been

warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See

Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Sherman has waived appellate

review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss

the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 11

                              IVI PUBLISHING, INC.
            EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE LOSS
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


                                                   Year Ended December 31
                                              1997        1996        1995
                                            --------    --------    --------
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED
Average common shares outstanding              8,056       7,580       7,484
                                            --------    --------    --------

         Total                                 8,056       7,580       7,484
                                            ========    ========    ========

Net loss applicable to common
   shareholders                             $(13,965)   $(10,336)   $(14,254)
                                            ========    ========    ========

Net loss per common share                   $  (1.73)   $  (1.36)   $  (1.90)
                                            ========    ========    ========
EXHIBIT 10.37
  
        /s/ Thomas O. MortonName: Thomas O. MortonTitle: Senior Vice President, Human Resources




---



##### 



th
 /s/ Raouf Y. HalimRaouf Y. Halim
David Greear dba Silver Image Studio P.O. Box 252 Helen, GA 30545

To whom it may concern, I have been a professional photographer for over 30 years. I am requesting an exemption to rule 14 CFR § 11.81

. Providing aerial photography has been a part of my business since it’s beginning. The terrain in our region is very mountainous and utilizing piloted aircraft is very hazardous. Due to the mountainous terrain, photographing real estate from the ground is difficult and often inadequate. Having the ability to use a camera equipped, unmanned, remotely controlled quadcopter is a much safer alternative to piloted aircraft for the public at large. I will never have the need to fly over 400 feet in altitude and never will operate the aircraft out of sight. I have lived in the same location for over 30 years and I am very involved with my community. I have served on government commissions and boards. I am a responsible adult. I have built a good reputation for being a conscientious professional. Respectfully submitted, David Greear
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION 

12/3/2014 

DATE RECEIVED 

• 

Scanned & Processed in 

CIS by: PAULA OPPT -2013-0225 

COMMENTS: DOCKET 
7 intentionally Blank pages for the sanitized CBI document for LCPFC rep01ied to the 2012 

CDR as CBI 

......, 

= 

-=-

rrl = 

c-'J 

I 

w 

""" ::r;: 

\NITIZED = 

w 

"' 

SANITIZED 

O:;o 

-om 

-oo 

-{fTj 

n:;:::: en .. _1'1 

oo
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARC ANDREW BARGER, SR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 131 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1579/2006

of 20 October 2006         

opening an invitation to tender for the allocation of A3 export licences for fruit and vegetables (tomatoes, oranges, lemons, table grapes and apples)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 35(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   An invitation to tender for the allocation of A3 export licences is hereby opened. The products concerned, the tender submission period, the indicative refund rates and the scheduled quantities are laid down in the Annex hereto.

2.   The licences issued in respect of food aid as referred to in Article 16 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 (4) shall not count against the eligible quantities in the Annex hereto.

3.   Notwithstanding Article 5(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1961/2001, the term of validity of the A3 licences shall be four months.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 2 November 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 October 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2003 (OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 64).

(2)OJ L 268, 9.10.2001, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

(3)OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1. Regulation, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2091/2005 (OJ L 343, 24.12.2005, p. 1).

(4)OJ L 152, 24.6.2000, p. 1.

----

ANNEX

OPENING AN INVITATION TO TENDER FOR THE ALLOCATION OF A3 EXPORT LICENCES FOR FRUIT AND VEGETABLES (TOMATOES, ORANGES, LEMONS, TABLE GRAPES AND APPLES)

----

(1)  The product codes are defined in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 (OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1).

(2)  The ‘            A            ’ series destination codes are defined in Annex II to Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87. The numeric destination codes are set out in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 (OJ L 313, 28.11.2003, p. 11). The other destinations are defined as follows:

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT GARRISON PROPERTY AND CASUALTY ) COMPANY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2287 ) CLEMENTE ARIAS, AMARILYS ARIAS, ) ANGELIQUE FLORES, AND MARY ANNA ) PORTER, ) )

Appellees. ) ___________________________________)
Opinion filed October 11, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Elizabeth G. Rice, Judge. Kansas E. Gooden and Kristen M. Van Der Linde of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant. Kathryn E. Lee and Kevin Britt Woods of Woods Trial Law, Tampa, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. Macedo, 228 So. 3d 1111 (Fla. 2017).- 2 -

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
#### Joe Lewis BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-7951.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 13, 2002.

Decided Feb. 10, 2003.

Joe Lewis Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Joe Lewis Brown appeals the district court’s order sua sponte dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as untimely because it was filed beyond the one-year limitation period of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) (2000). Because the district court sua sponte dismissed Brown’s § 2254 petition as untimely without affording him notice or an opportunity to be heard and because it is not indisputably clear from the district court record that the petition is untimely and cannot be salvaged by equitable tolling principles or any of the circumstances enumerated in § 2244(d)(1), we grant a certificate of appealability, vacate the district court’s order, and remand to the district court for additional proceedings consistent with *Hill v. Braxton,*277 F.3d 701 (4th Cir.2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*VACATED AND REMANDED.*
EXHIBIT 10.1

 

Employee Stock Option Grants

 

On January 26, 2012, the Compensation Committee of  the Pernix Group, Inc. Board of Directors approved, the employee stock option grants in the amount and upon the terms and conditions set forth below.

 

General Terms of Grant:

 

·      Form of grant: Stock option awards for executive officers and key executives. 

 

·      Term and vesting of stock options: The stock option grants vest equally over a 5 year period and have a 10 year term. 

 

·      Grant date: January 26, 2012. 

 

·      Exercise Price for Stock Options: To be determined based on fair market value. 

 

·      Number of stock options and performance shares:  

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Stock Options
    	
 
    
	
Nidal Z. Zayed, President and CEO
    	
 
    	
—
    	
 
    	
60,000
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Gregg D. Pollack, Vice President - Administration   and Chief Financial Officer
    	
 
    	
—
    	
 
    	
35,000
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Jim Rice, Vice President — Construction
    	
 
    	
—
    	
 
    	
35,000
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Scott Finch, Vice President — Finance and   Corporate Strategy
    	
 
    	
—
    	
 
    	
22,500
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Carol J. Groeber - Corporate Controller and   Principal Accounting Officer
    	
 
    	
—
    	
 
    	
22,500
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                   MECHANICAL DYNAMICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
              FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
in thousands, except share and per share data                               1999           1998            1997
----------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- -------------- -------------
<S>                                                                     <C>            <C>            <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
   Net income (loss)...............................................     $       1,095  $        (217) $         744
                                                                        =============  =============  =============

   Weighted average common shares outstanding......................         6,254,308      6,186,469      5,805,936
                                                                        =============  =============  =============

   Basic net income (loss) per common share........................     $        0.18  $       (0.04) $        0.13
                                                                        =============  =============  =============

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
   Net income (loss)...............................................     $       1,095  $        (217) $         744
                                                                        =============  =============  =============

   Weighted average common shares outstanding......................         6,254,308      6,186,469      5,805,936
   Effect of stock options and warrants............................                68             --         61,817
                                                                        -------------  -------------  -------------
     Weighted average common and common equivalent shares
     outstanding...................................................
                                                                            6,254,376      6,186,469      5,867,753
                                                                        =============  =============  =============

   Diluted net income (loss) per common share......................     $        0.18  $       (0.04) $        0.13
                                                                        =============  =============  =============
</TABLE>