Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices 2257 

207–7858 via 711 for TTY-Based 

Telecommunications Relay Service. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: IMLS is 

the primary source of federal support for 

the nation’s libraries and museums. We 

advance, support, and empower 

America’s museums, libraries, and 

related organizations through grant 

making, research, and policy 

development. To learn more, visit 

www.imls.gov. 

Current Actions: The purpose of the 

Native American Library Services Basic 

Grants Program is to assist Native 

American tribes in improving library 

services for their communities. IMLS 

recognizes that information needs, and 

approaches to meeting them, are 

evolving at an unprecedented pace in all 

communities, and to operate within this 

environment effectively for the benefit 

of their users, libraries must be able to 

both strengthen existing services and 

move quickly to adopt new and 

emerging technologies. 

The two goals for this program will be 

(1) to improve services for learning and 

accessing information in a variety of 

formats to support needs for education, 

workforce development, economic and 

business development, health 

information, critical thinking skills, and 

digital literacy skills; and (2) to enhance 

the skills of the current library 

workforce and leadership through 

training, continuing education, and 

opportunities for professional 

development. 

This action is to renew the forms and 

instructions for the Notice of Funding 

Opportunities for the next three years. 

The 60-Day Notice was published in 

the Federal Register on November 7, 

2023 (88 FR 76862–76863). The agency 

has taken into consideration the one 

comment that was received under this 

notice. 

Agency: Institute of Museum and 

Library Services. 

Title: IMLS Native American Library 

Services Basic Grant Program Notice of 

Funding Opportunity. 

OMB Control Number: 3137–0093. 

Affected Public: Federally Recognized 

Indian Tribes. 

Total Number of Respondents: 200. 

Frequency of Response: Once per 

request. 

Average Hours per Response: 10 

hours. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Burden Hours: 2,000. 

Total Annualized capital/startup 

costs: n/a. 

Cost Burden: $62,280. 

Total Annual Federal Costs: $32,646. 

Dated: January 9, 2024. 

Suzanne Mbollo, 

Grants Management Specialist, Institute of 

Museum and Library Services. 

[FR Doc. 2024–00590 Filed 1–11–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7036–01–P 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

Notice of Intent To Seek Approval To 

Establish an Information Collection 

System; Computer Science for All— 

Evaluation and Systematic Review of 

Grantee Documents 

AGENCY: National Science Foundation. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: Under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, and as part of its 

continuing effort to reduce paperwork 

and respondent burden, the National 

Science Foundation (NSF) is inviting 

the general public or other Federal 

agencies to comment on this proposed 

continuing information collection. 

DATES: Written comments on this notice 

must be received by March 12, 2024, to 

be assured consideration. Comments 

received after that date will be 

considered to the extent practicable. 

Send comments to address below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance 

Officer, National Science Foundation, 

2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite E7400, 

Alexandria, Virginia 22314; telephone 

(703) 292–7556; or send email to 

splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use 

a telecommunications device for the 

deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 

Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1– 

800–877–8339, which is accessible 24 

hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a 

year (including federal holidays). 

Comments: Comments are invited on: 

(a) whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Foundation, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Foundation’s 

estimate of the burden of the proposed 

collection of information; (c) ways to 

enhance the quality, utility, and clarity 

of the information to be collected; and 

(d) ways to minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title of Collection: Computer Science 

for All—Evaluation and Systematic 

Review of Grantee Documents. 

OMB Number: 3145–NEW. 

Expiration Date of Approval: Not 

applicable. 

Type of Request: Intent to seek 

approval to establish an information 

collection for post-award output and 

outcome monitoring system. 

Abstract: Computer Science for All 

Researcher Practitioner Partnership 

(RPP) grantees are required to submit 

Annual Reports and Project Outcome 

reports to NSF that summarize the 

outputs, outcomes, and impact of their 

funded work. NSF is required by 

Congress to demonstrate the long-term 

outcomes for the CSforAll RPP 

initiative, defined as those that occur at 

least 5 years since grantees received 

funding. the first year where these longterm outcomes can be documented for 

the first CSforAll RPP cohort, funded in 

2017, was 2023. This multi-year 

evaluation is focused on documenting 

the long-term outcomes for the first 

three cohorts of the initiative—2017, 

2018, and 2019. There are a total of 73 

funded grants from the three cohorts. To 

effectively extract and analyze the 

needed information to document longterm outcomes for these 73 RPP grants, 

a systematic review of all grantee 

reports of outputs, outcomes, and 

impacts will be conducted, following 

these steps: 

Develop a document review form. The 

researchers conducting the evaluation of 

these long-term outcomes for the three 

cohorts of grantees will develop and use 

a document review form that will 

include fields for recording information 

needed for this evaluation, guided by 

the required outputs, outcomes, and 

impacts that NSF must document in a 

report to Congress. The form will 

include all information that the 

researchers were able to glean from the 

grantees’ reports and will highlight 

where information is missing about each 

grant’s outputs and outcomes during the 

period of performance, and up to at least 

5 years after the grant was funded. The 

review form will focus on the relevant 

outputs, outcomes, and impacts related 

to each of the three strands of the 

CSforAll RPPs initiative (preK–8, high 

school, and multi-grade pathways) to 

document the long-term outcomes for 

each of those strands. 

Review all grantee documents using 

the review form. The document review 

form will be completed and compiled 

by trained researchers who conduct a 

primary and secondary review of all 

relevant grantee documents related to 

the funded RPP, including the grantees’ 

reports to NSF, as well as any related 

publications and websites, to help 

ensure thoroughness, consistency, and 

accuracy. The researchers will 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
2258 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices 

document all outputs, outcomes, and 

impacts they can find in their document 

reviews. These will be aligned with the 

list of required outputs, outcomes, and 

impacts that NSF must report to 

Congress (e.g., number and 

demographics of teachers, number and 

demographics of students served by the 

grant). 

Produce grantee profile memos for 

grantee verification. After the 

researchers complete the document 

review forms for each funded RPP grant 

to the best of their ability, the 

information will be summarized in a 

memo to be shared with each grantee for 

their review and to gather any missing 

information. PIs will be asked to 

provide any missing information, 

focused on known outputs, outcomes, 

and impacts up to at least 5 years after 

funding was received. After they have 

had time to review the form and gather 

the missing information, each PI will be 

invited to participate in 30–60 minute 

interview conducted via 

videoconferencing. The interview will 

be conducted by a member of the 

research team, with the purpose of 

confirming the outputs, outcomes, and 

impacts in the document review form, 

and following up with any remaining 

questions about the impact of the grant 

on preK–12 computer science education 

in the education systems that were 

served by the grant. 

Finalize grantee-provided data and 

identify additional primary data 

collections. Any additional information 

provided by grantees will be added to 

the review document forms to finalize 

existing grantee data and to determine 

what additional data are needed to 

address research questions, the most 

appropriate method for collecting that 

information (e.g., surveys, interviews, 

focus groups), and from whom (e.g., 

district or school administration, 

teachers). Because this evaluation 

project involves providing NSF with 

insights about other relevant outcomes 

and impacts they may not have 

anticipated for this evaluation, the 

information collected from grantees’ 

completion of the document review 

form and their interviews will be used 

to identify those additional outcomes 

and impacts. 

Use of the Information 

Much of the data needed for this 

collection will come from a review of 

the Annual Reports, Final Reports, 

Evaluation Reports, and Project 

Outcome Reports that grantees are 

required to submit to NSF. After a 

systematic review of all grantee 

documents for the 73 funded grants, 

necessary information will be extracted 

from the documents and reviewed by 

grantee PIs, following the steps outlined 

in the abstract. 

ESTIMATE OF PUBLIC BURDEN

Collection title Number of respondents Annual number of responses/respondent Annual hour 

burden 

Verification of Document Review Form 

Information by RPP Grantees.

73 grantee PIs ......................................... 2 (1 hour for document review and up to 

1 hour for follow-up call).

146 

Respondents 

The respondents are the Principal 

Investigator and/or program evaluator of 

each grant. They will be asked to review 

their grantee-specific memo, determine 

whether their data are accurately 

represented, and provide any additional 

available information during a 30–60- 

minute call. 

Estimates of Annualized Cost to 

Respondents for the Hour Burdens 

The overall annualized cost to the 

respondents is estimated to be 

$8,085.48. The following table shows 

the annualized estimate of costs to PIs/ 

designee respondents, who are generally 

university research faculty members. 

This estimated hourly rate is based on 

the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ 

Occupational Employment and Wage 

Statistics from May 2022, for 

‘‘Education Administrators, 

Postsecondary.’’ According to these 

estimates, the mean hourly wage for a 

postsecondary education administrator 

was $55.38. 

Respondent type Number of 

respondents 

Burden hours 

per 

respondent 

Average 

hourly rate 

Estimated 

annual cost 

Grantees/PIs .................................................................................................... 73 2 $55.38 $8,085.48 

Total .......................................................................................................... 73 ........................ ........................ 8,085.48 

Source: https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes119033.htm. 

Estimated Number of Responses per 

Report 

Data collection involves all 73 

grantees for the funded CSforAll RPP 

grants in the 2017, 2018, and 2019 

cohorts. 

Dated: January 9, 2024. 

Suzanne H. Plimpton, 

Reports Clearance Officer, National Science 

Foundation. 

[FR Doc. 2024–00593 Filed 1–11–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. MC2024–161 and CP2024–167] 

New Postal Products 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recent Postal Service filing for the 

Commission’s consideration concerning 

a negotiated service agreement. This 

notice informs the public of the filing, 

invites public comment, and takes other 

administrative steps. 

DATES: Comments are due: January 17, 

2024. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http://

www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit 

comments electronically should contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section by 

telephone for advice on filing 

alternatives. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 

202–789–6820. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES