alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1                          CERTIFICATION

I, Vito A. Peppitoni, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Arizona
Aircraft Spares, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.


Date: May 24, 2004                     By: /s/  Vito A. Peppitoni
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
                                      (Principal Executive Officer)
United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

July 6, 2016

ERRATUM

______________________ 

Appeal No. 2016-1308

______________________ 

AMGEN INC., AMGEN MANUFACTURING

LIMITED,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

APOTEX INC., APOTEX CORP.,

Defendants-Appellants

______________________ 

Decided: July 5, 2016

Precedential Opinion

______________________ 

The following change has been made: 

On page 5, line 22 of the opinion, change “short-hand” to

“shorthand.”
Exhibit 3.4(i)

THIRD AMENDMENT TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

OF

NOVOSTE CORPORATION

Novoste Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, hereby certifies as follows:

1.
The name of the corporation is currently Novoste Corporation.

2. This Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation
amends Article I of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the corporation, as heretofore amended, as follows:

The
name of the corporation is NOVT Corporation (the Corporation).

3. In accordance with Section 607.1003 of the Florida
Business Corporation Act, this Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation was (i) duly recommended to shareholders by the board of directors of the corporation on October 11, 2005 and (ii) duly approved by
shareholders at a special meeting of shareholders held on March 7, 2006, at which meeting the number of shareholder votes cast for the amendment was sufficient for approval.

4. This Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation shall be effective upon filing.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have made, subscribed and acknowledged this Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation this
9thday of March, 2006.



/s/ Alfred J. NovakAlfred J. NovakPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Daniel G. HallDaniel G. HallCorporate Secretary
##### 



Exhibit 32.4 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his
capacity as an officer of Emmis Operating Company (the Company), that, to his
knowledge:  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period
ended May 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Date: May 14, 2004 /s/
    
    WALTER Z. BERGERWalter Z. BergerExecutive Vice President, Treasurer and ChiefFinancial Officer
 -11-
#### Sidney MABINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lawrence AMBROGI, Commonwealth’s Attorney; Luke Boyd, Public Defender, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-7858.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 2003.

Decided Feb. 13, 2003.

Sidney Mabine, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Sidney Mabine appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Mabine v. Ambrogi,*No. CA-02-1061 (W.D.Va. Oct. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cal-Bay International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles A. Prebay, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









Date: November 10, 2004

/s/ Charles A. Prebay

Charles A. Prebay

Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 29, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-41222 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LEONEL TURBERVILLE-LICONA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-03-CR-602-1

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Leonel Turberville-Licona (Turberville) was convicted of transporting an undocumented alien by means of a motor vehicle for private financial gain within the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(B)(i). Turberville asserts that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized following an allegedly unlawful vehicle stop. Turberville was stopped by an experienced Border Patrol Agent who observed that Turberville’s car was riding low andNo. 03-41222 -2- bounced, as though it was carrying a heavy load. The Agent testified that as she observed Turberville’s vehicle, she saw it twice swerve onto the shoulder and back into its lane. The front seat passenger in the car appeared to be ducking, as if to hide, then sat up erect when the Agent pulled alongside the vehicle. Additionally, the Agent testified that there appeared to be people hiding in the back seat of the four-door sedan, since prior to stopping the vehicle the Agent observed two adult heads pressed against the windows and knees, as though the people had their legs folded. Moreover, the Agent had experience with conducting illegal alien stops in the same area where she stopped Turberville, and she testified that Turberville’s route is a route commonly used to transport aliens northward. Thus, the totality of the circumstances indicates that the Border Patrol Agent had reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts that criminal activity was afoot. See United States v. Neufeld-Neufeld , 338 F.3d 374, 378-80 (5th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
[Cite as State v. Hinson , 2013-Ohio-776.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2012-06-121

: D E C I S I O N - vs - 3/4/2013 : JEROME HINSON, : Defendant-Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR2012-02-0171

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for plaintiff-appellee Charles M. Conliff, 5145 Pleasant Avenue, Suite 18, P.O. Box 18424, Fairfield, Ohio 45018- 0424, for defendant-appellant

Per Curiam

. {¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel, oral argument having been waived. {¶ 2} Counsel for def endant-appellant, Jerome Hinson, has filed a brief with this courtButler CA2012-06-121 pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists thirteen potential erro rs "that might arg uably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proc eedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constituti onal rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the tr ial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to wit hdraw as counsel is grant ed, and this a ppeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

HENDRICKSON, P.J., PIPER AND M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report
of CarePayment Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patricia J. Brown, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: August 13, 2012   | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|/s/ Patricia J. Brown   | 
|Patricia J. Brown       | 
|Chief Financial Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5076 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 505
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5076

                          [Report No. 115-657]

 To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to extend the examination 
           cycle for certain insured depository institutions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 20, 2018

  Ms. Tenney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

                             April 26, 2018

             Additional sponsors: Mr. Crist and Mr. Sherman

                             April 26, 2018

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
                  [Insert the part printed in italic]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to extend the examination 
           cycle for certain insured depository institutions.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Bank Exam Cycle Improvement 
Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. EXAMINATION CYCLE.

    Section 10(d) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 
1820(d)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4)(A), by striking ``$1,000,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$3,000,000,000''; and
            (2) in paragraph (10), by striking ``$1,000,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$3,000,000,000''. 

SEC. 3. GAO STUDY AND REPORT.

    Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit a report to the 
Congress on the effect of extending the examination cycle for 
qualifying institutions pursuant to section 2 of this Act on the 
ability of agencies to effectively supervise and protect the safety and 
soundness of qualifying institutions.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 505

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5076

                          [Report No. 115-657]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to extend the examination 
           cycle for certain insured depository institutions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 26, 2018

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied , Motion for Stay Denied, and

Memorandum Opinion filed December 6, 20 2 2

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00 716

- CV

IN RE ROBERT CARTER HIGLEY , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 189 th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021

- 32442



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 4 , 2022 , relator Robert Carter Higley filed a petition for writ of

m andamus in this Court , and he supplemented the petition on October 20, 2020

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Scot Dollinger
, presiding judge of
the 189 th District Court of Harris County
, to vacate orders compelling production of
communications between relator and attorneys for his brother, as well as communications between his brothers and relator’s own attorneys, regarding a state court proceeding in Harris County in which relator (but no t his brother) is a party2

and a state court proceeding in Travis County in which relator’s brother (but not relator himself) is a party

. 1

Relator ha s not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator ’s petition for writ of mandamus. Relator’s motion filed October 6, 2022 for a stay of trial court proceedings is hereby denied. We also
lift our temporary stay entered on October 6, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and H assan.

1 To the extent the petition encompasses additional communications, we see no basis for mandamus relief.
Exhibit 12.1

                        CHARTWELL RE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
                     CHARTWELL RE CORPORATION (PREDECESSOR)
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (Dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      CHARTWELL RE CORPORATION (PREDECESSOR)
                                               --------------------------------------
                                                      Year ended December 31,
                                           ----------------------------------------------
                                             1996     1995     1994      1993     1992
<S>                                        <C>      <C>      <C>       <C>      <C>
Earnings Before Fixed Charges:
Income (loss) from continuing operations
   before income taxes ..................  $31,706  $ 8,939  $(5,120)  $ 6,763  $(14,016)
Interest and debt expense ...............    7,367    7,734    6,580     4,662     3,545
Interest portion of rental expense ......      462      244      224       182       169
                                           -------  -------  -------   -------  --------
Earnings before fixed charges ...........  $39,535  $16,917  $ 1,684   $11,607  $(10,302)
                                           =======  =======  =======   =======  ========

Fixed Charges:
Interest and debt expense ...............  $ 7,367  $ 7,734  $ 6,580   $ 4,662  $  3,545
Interest portion of rental expense ......      462      244      224       182       169
                                           -------  -------  -------   -------  --------
Fixed charges ...........................  $ 7,829  $ 7,978  $ 6,804   $ 4,844  $  3,714
                                           =======  =======  =======   =======  ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ......    5.05x    2.12x    0.25x     2.40x      --
                                           =======  =======  =======   =======  ========

Deficiency of earnings available to cover
   fixed charges ........................     --       --       --        --    $ 14,016
                                           =======  =======  =======   =======  ========
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 1st Constitution Bancorp (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Name:  | Robert F. Mangano                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
| Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:  | May 11, 2006                          |
|        |                                       |

 

 
| Name:  | Joseph M. Reardon                   |
|--------|-------------------------------------|
| Title: | Senior Vice President and Treasurer |
| Date:  | May 11, 2006                        |
|        |                                     |

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating  Partners  1993-B,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and statement of operations
contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         17,133
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  176,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               194,105
<PP&E>                                         9,430,159
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,416,816)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,232,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          99,337
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,112,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,232,612
<SALES>                                        602,969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               622,726
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,625,473<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,139,659)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,139,659)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,139,659)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>