alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AIRNET
SYSTEMS, INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,142
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,531
<ALLOWANCES>                                       290
<INVENTORY>                                      9,386
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,508
<PP&E>                                         131,782
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,956
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,943
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           128
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,962
<SALES>                                          1,366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,681
<CGS>                                              853
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,352
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,336
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,347
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,711
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,636
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,636
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURUSANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Colony RIH Holdings, Inc. and Resorts International Hotel and Casino, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Audrey S. Oswell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/s/    AUDREY S. OSWELL                               
|                                                      
|Audrey S. Oswell President and Chief Executive Officer



May 12, 2004
#### Reuben Lampkin, *Plaintiff in*Error, v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion filed Dec. 8, 1915.

An assignment of error based upon alleged improper, remarks of counsel in addressing the jury will not be considered unless it is made to appear by the bill of exceptions that the remarks objected to were improper as not being reasonable deductions from the evidence, that a timely objection was taken thereto, the ruling of the court thereon and the exception.

Writ of Error to Court of Record, Escambia County ; Kirke Monroe, Judge.

Judgment affirmed.

*Philip D. Beall*and *Robert H.*Anderson, for Plaintiff in Error;

*T. F. West,*Attorney General, and *C. O. Andrews,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the Court of Record of Escambia County on an information containing three counts, charging him with rob*449bery while being armed with a dangerous weapon and with the intent if resisted, to kill and maim the persons robbed. There was a verdict of guilty on all the counts. The judgment of the court as shown by an amendment to the record filed here about a month and a half after the return day of the writ is as follows: “This cause came on this day for sentence, and the defendant being present in court: It is therefore considered by the court that the said defendant do be sent to the State Prison at hard labor for a period of 4 years on each of the 4 counts.”

The information is not defective and the sentence on each count runs concurrently. So it is unnecessary to send the case back for a correction in the sentence.

The only assignments of error are based upon matters' *in pais*which could be exhibited only by a bill of exceptions. The document which purports to be a bill of exceptions is not made up in the form prescribed by the rule, and there is doubt whether the name of the judge which appears to have been affixed to the document was intended to be affixed merely to the order overruling the motion for a new trial and order granting time within which to present a bill of exceptions. However, treating the document as a bill of exceptions, it contains none of the evidence adduced at the trial, therefore nothing to show that the remarks of the Solicitor were improper as not being reasonable deductions from the evidence. The document does not show any ruling by the court on the defendant’s “exception.” From anything appearing to the contrary, the court corrected the error by appropriate instructions if error was committed. We cannot assume that the court failed to perform its duty. See Young v. State, decided this term.

*450The judgment of the court is affirmed.

All concur, except Cockrell, J., absent on account of sickness.
##### 



Cooper US, Inc.
Executive Stock Incentive Agreement
 th
 Performance Share Award
 Performance Period
 Performance Share Grant
 Fully Diluted EPSAnnual EPS
    
    Cumulative Total Over
    
    Performance SharesPerformance Goal
    
    Growth Rate
    
    Performance Period
    
    That May Be EarnedThreshold
    
    
    4
    %
    
    $
    13.37Good
    
    
    8
    %
    
    $
    14.45Target
    
    
    12
    %
    
    $
    15.57Maximum
    
    
    16
    %
    
    $
    16.75




---



##### 



Dividends
 Restrictions and Limitations
 Forfeiture
 - 2 -




---



##### 



Termination Upon Death or Disability
 Limitations on Transferability
 Tax
 - 3 -




---



##### 



Election to Defer Shares
  Change in Control
 - 4 -




---



##### 



Consideration
 Plan Incorporated
 Binding Effect
  COOPER US, INC.By:David R. SheilSenior Vice President, Human Resources,
& Chief Administrative Officer EXECUTIVEBy:(name)(title) - 5 -
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A0 50 6 . I N RE: ESTATE OF J AMES EDW I N BALDW I N , DECEASED.

W e h av e re v i e w e d t h e bri efs an d reco rd i n t h i s cas e. Becau s e n o rev ers i b l e

erro r ap pears t o ex i s t an d t he es t ab l i s h m en t o f p reced en t i s n o t d es i rab l e, t he ap p eal
i s h ereb y DISM ISSED as im p ro v i d en tl y g ran t ed

. See Co u rt o f A p p eal s Ru le 3 0 (b ).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## June 07, 2022

06/07/2022
#### Freddie EASON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CITY OF MEMPHIS, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 92-6157, 92-6158.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 3, 1994.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Ciruit Judges.

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

> The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the ease on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 506 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an additional tool to 

prevent certain frauds against veterans, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2017 

Mr. THOMAS J. ROONEY of Florida (for himself and Mr. DEUTCH) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an additional tool to prevent certain frauds against veterans, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Crimes 

5 Against Veterans Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL TOOL TO PREVENT CERTAIN FRAUDS 

7 AGAINST VETERANS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 47 of title 18, United 

9 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 506 IH

1 ‘‘§ 1041. Fraud regarding veterans’ benefits 

2 ‘‘(a) Whoever knowingly engages in any scheme or 

3 artifice to defraud an individual of veterans’ benefits, or 

4 in connection with obtaining veteran’s benefits for that in5 dividual, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not 

6 more than five years, or both. 

7 ‘‘(b) In this section— 

8 ‘‘(1) the term ‘veteran’ has the meaning given 

9 that term in section 101 of title 38; and 

10 ‘‘(2) the term ‘veterans’ benefits’ means any 

11 benefit provided by Federal law for a veteran or a 

12 dependent or survivor of a veteran.’’. 

13 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

14 at the beginning of chapter 47 of title 18, United States 

15 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

16 item: 

‘‘1041. Fraud regarding veterans’ benefits.’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

CLARIFICATION ORDER

Appellate case name: In re The Park Square Co-Owners Association and Stephen 

Russell

Appellate case number: 01-20-00318-CV

Trial court case number: 2020-22266

Trial court: 133rd District Court of Harris County

Relators, The Park Square Co-Owners Association and Stephen Russell, have filed 

a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging the entry of a temporary restraining order by 

the ancillary trial court. In connection with the petition for writ of mandamus, relators also 

filed an emergency motion for temporary relief, seeking this Court stay enforcement of the 

temporary restraining order. On April 14, 2020, the Court granted relators’ motion, stating: 

“The April 9, 2020 temporary restraining order in Cause No. 2020-22266, pending in the 

133rd District Court of Harris County, Texas, is stayed.”

On April 16, 2020, real party in interest, Fratelli Designs, LLC, filed an emergency 

motion for clarification, seeking understanding of this Court’s April 14, 2020 stay order.

This Court’s April 14, 2020 stay order, which stayed the enforcement of the April 

9, 2020 temporary restraining order, does not prevent the parties and the trial court from 

holding a hearing on the application for a temporary injunction, engaging in expedited 

discovery as permitted in the trial court’s April 9, 2020 order, or participating in mediation 

related to this dispute.

We dismiss real party in interest’s emergency motion for clarification as moot. Any 

response to the petition for writ of mandamus from real party in interest remains due 20 

days from the date of this Court’s April 14, 2020 stay order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn Keyes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 17, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,603
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,512
<INVENTORY>                                      8,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,309
<PP&E>                                          11,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,956
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,996
<SALES>                                         16,892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,892
<CGS>                                            5,257
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 961
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,258
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,258
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,973
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,715)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Thomas F. August, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Prentiss Properties Trust;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: March 12, 2004   
|                       
|/s/ Thomas F. August   
|Thomas F. August       
|Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-40633

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAVIER ORTIZ-AROZENA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:01-CR-239-ALL

--------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender has moved for leave to withdraw

from representation of Javier Ortiz-Arozena and has filed a brief

in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Ortiz-Arozena has filed a response in which he challenges the

sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry,

which was the violation resulting in the revocation of his

supervised release. Ortiz does not challenge the validity of the

revocation proceeding or the sentence imposed.
No. 05-40633

-2-

Our independent review of the brief, Ortiz-Arozena’s

response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00222
- CV

Michael Belcher and Vicky Belcher, Appellant s

v. Woodlake Property Owners Association, Section One, Inc.; William “Bill” King; and, Thomas “Tom” Kirwan, Appellee s

FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF B ELL COUNTY, NO. 285,950
- B, THE H ONORABLE JACK WELDON JONES, JUDGE PRESID ING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM Appellants filed this interlocutory appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion to dismiss under Chapter 27 of the Tex as Civil Practice and Remedies Code

. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 27.001

– 27.011, 51.014(a)(12) (Texas Citizens Participation Act) . This automatically stayed all proceedings in the trial court pending resolution of the appeal. See id. § 51.014(b)

. Appellants filed a motion to lift the stay of the trial

- court proceedings to allow the district court to make the findings prescribed in section 27.007 of the T exas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See id. § 27.007(a). Appellants also request that we direct the district clerk to supplement the records in this appeal within ten days of the district court’s signing of the order making the above findings. Finally, Appellants seek an extension of time to file their brief with this Court to incorporate and address the district court’s findings under section 27.007(a).Appellees have not responded to Appellants ’ motion. We grant Appellants’ motion in part. We lift the stay of the trial

- court proceedings for 30 days (until July 8, 2019) to allow the di strict court to issu e an order making the findings required by section 27.007(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code and directing the district clerk to prepare and forward an appropriate supplement al clerk’s record to this Court. The supplement al clerk’s record should be forwarded to this Court within ten days after the district court signs the order. Because Appellants have already filed their appellate brief, we dismiss as moot their request for an extension of time. Appellants may file a supplemental brief to incorporate and address the district court’s findings within fifteen days of the district court’s signing of the order making the findings. It is ordered on June 7 , 2019.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-116834, 333-100309, 333-72466, 333-64054, 333-38346,333-66347, 333-20539) of Wild Oats Markets, Inc. of our reports dated February 28, 2006,with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Wild Oats Markets, Inc., WildOats Markets, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Wild Oats Markets, Inc., as of December 31, 2005 and January 1, 2005 and forthe two years in the period ended December 31, 2005 included in this Annual Report (Form10-K).

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Denver, Colorado

February 28, 2006