alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Byron Lee BRILEY, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7354.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 14, 2003.

Decided Jan. 30, 2003.

*180Byron Lee Briley, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Byron Lee Briley, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting and approving the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court, *see Briley v. Angelone,*No. CA-01-670 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 27, 2002 & entered Aug. 28, 2002), that Briley has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2000). We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 1 7

- 1750

_____________________________
L IDALE R. K ELLUM , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

___________________________ On appeal from t he Circuit Court for B a y County

. Hentz McClellan
, Judge

. April 13, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
W OLF , W INOKUR , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

___________ __________________ Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General
, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 23.2


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-12121, 333-12105, and 333-12103) pertaining to the
1992 Stock Option Plan, 1996 Director Option Plan, and 1996 Employee Stock
Option Plan of Diatide, Inc. of our report dated February 9, 1999, with respect
to the financial statements of Diatide, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.

                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Manchester, New Hampshire
March 25, 1999
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 D0 10 5 . J ESSE R. W ALKER, et a l . v . DI RECT PROPERTI ES, LLC.

Th i s cas e b eg an as a di s p o s s es s o ry p ro ceed i n g i n m ag i s t rat e co u rt

. Fo l l o wi n g

an ad v ers e ru l i n g , Defen d an t J es s e W al k er ap p eal ed t h e m ag is trat e co u rt ’ s d eci s i o n

t o t h e s u p eri o r co u rt

. Th e s u p eri o r co u rt ru l ed i n fav o r of Di rect Pro p ert i es , LLC, an d

Wa l k e r fi l ed a m o ti o n fo r n ew t ri al o r ju d g m en t n o twi th st an d in g th e v erd i ct

. O n

Oct o b er 9, 2 0 1 4, t h e t ri a l c o u r t d en i ed W al k er’ s m o t i o n

. On Oct o ber 2 0

, 2 0 1 4,

W al k er fi l ed t h i s ap pl i c a t i o n fo r d i s cret i o nary ap peal seek i n g rev i ew o f t h e t ri al

co u rt ’ s o rd er. W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Gen eral ly

, an ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i on ary ap p eal m u s t be fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 day s

o f en t ry o f t h e o rd er s o u g h t t o b e ap p eal ed

. OCGA § 5-6 -3 5 (d ). Bu t t he un d erl y i n g

s u b ject m at t er o f an ap peal co n t ro l s o v er t h e rel i ef s o u g h t i n det erm in i n g t he p ro p er

ap p el l at e p ro ced u re. See Reb i ch v. Mi les

, 26 4 Ga. 4 6 7

, 4 6 7

- 4 6 8 (4 4 8 SE2 d 1 9 2 )

(1 9 9 4). Th e u n d erl y i n g s u bject m at t er o f th i s d i s cret i o n ary ap p l icat i o n i s a

d i s p o s s es s o ry ju d g m en t

. OCGA § 4 4 -7 -5 6

, wh i ch g o vern s d i s po s ses s o ry act i o n s ,

req u i res t h at an ap p eal fro m a d i s p o s s es s o ry ru l i n g b e fi l ed wi t h i n s ev en d ay s o f t h e

d a t e j u d g m en t was en t ered

. W al k er fi l ed h i s ap pl i cat io n 1 1 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e

o rd er he s eek s t o ap p eal

. Th e req u i rem en t s o f OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 are ju ri s d i ct i o n al

, an d

t h i s Co u rt can n o t accep t an ap p l i cat i o n fo r ap peal n ot m ad e i n co m p l i an ce t h erewi t h.

See Bo yl e v. S t a t e , 1 90 Ga. Ap p . 7 3 4 (3 8 0 SE2 d 5 7 ) (1 9 8 9 ).

Becau s e W al k er’ s ap p l i c a t i o n i s u n t i m e l y, t h i s Co u rt l ack s ju ri sd i ct i o n o v er

t h i s ap p l i cat i o n , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED. November 17, 2014C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 11/17/2014
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1689 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1689

To provide regulatory fairness for crude oil producers, and to prohibit 
fee increases under the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act without 
                       the approval of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 19, 1996

  Mr. Gramm (for himself and Mrs. Hutchison) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide regulatory fairness for crude oil producers, and to prohibit 
fee increases under the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act without 
                       the approval of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Crude Oil Transportation Fairness 
Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. REGULATORY FAIRNESS FOR CRUDE OIL PRODUCERS.

    Section 5108(a) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(5)(A) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a person who 
offers crude oil or condensates for transport in commerce shall not be 
required to file a registration statement or pay a fee otherwise 
required under this section if that person transfers title to the crude 
oil or condensates to a transporter at the time that the crude oil or 
condensates are initially transported in commerce from a storage 
location by the transporter.
    ``(B) Subparagraph (A) does not apply to any person who transports 
crude oil in commerce in a quantity that is subject to the requirements 
of this section.''.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF FEE INCREASES WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF CONGRESS.

    Section 5108(g)(2)(A) of title 49, United States Code, is amended 
in the second sentence, by striking ``at least $250 but not more than 
$5,000'' and inserting ``not more than $250''.
                                 <all>
```
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

359 

KA 14-01882 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EBONY S. MACK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County

(Francis A. Affronti, J.), rendered July 22, 2014. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of aggravated driving

while intoxicated with a child passenger (two counts), aggravated

driving while intoxicated, driving while intoxicated (two counts) and

endangering the welfare of a child. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her

upon her plea of guilty of, inter alia, aggravated driving while

intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [2-a] [a]). We agree with

defendant that the certificate of conviction incorrectly reflects that

her sentence included a fine, and it therefore must be amended to

correct that error (see generally People v Meza, 141 AD3d 1110, 1110,

lv denied 28 NY3d 928; People v Kemp, 112 AD3d 1376, 1377).

Entered: March 31, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1648 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 478
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1648

                          [Report No. 104-303]

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
  documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel HERCO 
                                 TYME.

Rule___________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 28, 1996

Mrs. Hutchison introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

                             June 27, 1996

              Reported by Mr. Pressler, without amendment

Rule___________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
  documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel HERCO 
                                 TYME.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, 
United States Code, and section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
U.S.C. App. 883), as applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of 
documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
coastwise trade for the vessel HERCO TYME (United States official 
number 911599).
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 478

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1648

                          [Report No. 104-303]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
  documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel HERCO 
                                 TYME.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 27, 1996

                       Reported without amendment
```
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1669

AN ACT

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center

in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ‘‘G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1669 ES

1 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

2 MEDICAL CENTER, JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI.

3 (a) NAME.—The Department of Veterans Affairs

4 medical center in Jackson, Mississippi, shall be known and

5 designated as the ‘‘G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery Department

6 of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. Any reference to

7 such medical center in any law, regulation, map, docu8 ment, record, or other paper of the United States shall

9 be considered to be a reference to the G.V. (Sonny) Mont10 gomery Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall take ef12 fect at noon on January 3, 1997.

Passed the Senate September 10, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1669

AN ACT

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs mediAffairs Medical Center’’. (Sonny) Montgomery Department of Veterans cal center in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ‘‘G.V.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00637-CR

Wayne Dymowski, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF HAYS COUNTY NO. 55,523, HONORABLE LINDA A. RODRIGUEZ, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Wayne Dymowski seeks to appeal the trial court’s order overruling of his “motion for post-conviction relief.” By this motion, Dymowski asked the court to set aside his July 1999 misdemeanor conviction in Hays County cause number 55,523 on the gr ound that he was not represented by counsel.

A final co nviction may not be set aside on the motion of a party. Instead, habeas corpus is the proper procedure by which to attack a final conviction in this State. S ee Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.09 (West 1977); Ex parte Schmidt , 109 S.W.3d 480, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Dymowski’s motion does not purport to be a petition for writ of habeas corpus. And if it

were to be construed as a habeas corpus petition, the trial court’s ruling is not appealable. S ee Ex parte Gonzales , 12 S.W.3d 913, 914 (Tex. App.—Austin 2000, pet. ref’d).2 Finding no basis for the appeal, we dismiss it for want of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________ Bea Ann Smith, Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Kidd and B. A. Smith Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: October 28, 2004 Do Not Publish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-24-003]

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE: 

January 24, 2024 at 11:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS: 

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        1.                         *Agendas for future meetings:*                         none.                    

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Commission vote on Inv. Nos. 701-TA-684 and 731-TA-1597 (Final) (Gas Powered Pressure Washers from China). The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on February 5, 2024.

                        5.                         *Outstanding action jackets:*                         none.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, 202-205-2000.

The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

 Issued: January 12, 2024.

Sharon Bellamy,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2024-00888 Filed 1-12-24; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7731

ANTONIO MARTINELLE RANDOLPH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

L. FUERTES ROSARIO, HSA-MLP; JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden; G. 

LINK, Physicians Assistant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. 

(9:09-cv-03166-RMG)

Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 3, 2011

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Martinelle Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier 

Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Martinelle Randolph appeals the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and dismissing without prejudice Randolph’s 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative 

remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Randolph v. Rosario, No. 9:09-cv-03166-RMG 

(D.S.C. Dec. 1, 2010). We deny Randolph’s motion for stay and 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 12.1

                        CHARTWELL RE HOLDINGS CORPORATION

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (Dollars in thousands)

                                                       Chartwell Re Corporation
                                                            (Predecessor)
                                                       -------------------------
                                                Year ended December 31,
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                       1997    1996     1995     1994    1993
                                       ----    ----     ----     ----    ----

Earnings Before Fixed Charges:
Income (loss) from continuing
 operations before minority interest,
 extraordinary item and income taxes. $40,501  $31,706  $8,939  $(5,120)  $6,763
Interest and debt expense...........    9,057    7,367   7,734    6,580    4,662
Interest portion of rental expense..      943      462     244      224      182
                                      -------  -------  ------   ------  -------
Earnings before fixed charges.......  $50,501  $39,535 $16,917   $1,684  $11,607
                                      =======  =======  ======   ======  =======

Fixed Charges:
Interest and debt expense...........  $ 9,057   $7,367  $7,734   $6,580  $ 4,662
Interest portion of rental expense..      943      462     244      224      182
                                      -------   ------  ------   ------  -------
Fixed charges.......................  $10,000   $7,829  $7,978   $6,804  $ 4,844
                                      =======   ======   ======   ======  ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges..    5.05x    5.05x    2.12x    0.25x   2.40x
                                        ====     ====     ====     ====    ====
Exhibit 32.2



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nexstar Broadcasting,
Inc. (together, the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                    |  |                                                                                        
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    | 
|Dated: May 14, 2004 |  | /S/    G. ROBERT
THOMPSON                                                              
|                    |  |                                                                                        
|                    |  | G. Robert Thompson Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Orion Acquisition Corp. II (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 11, 2005



|       |  |                                                  
|------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/    C. PATRICK
MACHADO                        
|Name:  |  | C. Patrick Machado                               
|Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely to accompany the report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
From: Denise Radinovic <dradinov@naima.org> 

 

To: Susan Fairchild/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

cc: Angus Crane <acrane@naima.org>, Chris Martin <cmartin@naima.org> 

 

Date: 08/30/2011 03:07 PM 

 

Subject: Non-Confidential Chrome Summary Sheet 

 

Dear Ms. Fairchild,

I spoke with Mr. Crane, and he asked me to forward to you the attached nonconfidential copy of the chrome summary sheet. He indicated that the previous 

version sent to you is actually non-confidential for NAIMA because it does not 

contain production data.

Please let me know if there is anything else you need.

Denise Radinovic

Coordinator, Legal and Regulatory Affairs North American Insulation Manufacturers 

Association

Ph: (703) 684-0084 ext. 125

Fax: (703) 684-0427

Visit NAIMA online at:

www.naima.org

www.PipeInsulation.org

(See attached file: Non-CONFIDENTIALChromeSummarySheet.xlsx)