alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1993-B,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         206,862
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  217,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               423,994
<PP&E>                                         6,031,371
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,982,690)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,472,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16,629
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,456,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,472,675
<SALES>                                        647,061
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               655,928
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  592,063
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (60,559)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (60,559)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (60,559)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 12ii



Certificate of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Atlas Pacific Ltd (the Company) for the financial year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Simon Adams as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



1. The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the
Report and result of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.



|/s/    SIMON ADAMS                 
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|Simon Adams Chief Financial Officer



July
15, 2003



This certificate accompanies this Report pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
### 1



# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS (Filed: August 26, 2016)

No. 13 -968V

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

JABARI WALKER *

*

*

Petitioner, * Decision on Joint Stipulation; * Human Papilloma Virus ( “ HPV ” )

v. * Vaccine; Muscle Damage

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

* Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Howard Gold, Gold Law Firm, LLC, Wellesley Hills, MA, for petitioner. Gordon Shemin, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

Roth , Special Master:

On December 9, 2013, Josita Walker filed a petition for compensation on behalf of her then-minor child, Jabari Walker, under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 Jabari Walker [“Mr. Walker” or “petitioner”] was substituted as petitioner on July 30, 2015. Petitioner alleges that he developed muscle damage as a result of receiving a human papilloma virus ( “HPV” ) vaccination on or about November, 27, 2012. See Stipulation, filed August 25,

2016 , at ¶¶ 1 . Respondent denies that the HPV immunization caused petitioner’s alleged injury

. Stipulation at ¶ 2.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information, that satisfies the criteria in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, I will delete such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).

### 2

Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On August 25, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms.

Respondent agrees to issue the following payment:

A lump sum of $ 2 0 ,0 00.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Jabari
Walker. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would b e

av ailable under § 300aa-15(a).

I adopt the parties’ stipula tion attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount

an d on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in

accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth Mindy Michaels Roth Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Lonnie HODGE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-4518.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 16, 2003.

Decided Jan. 22, 2003.

Matthew A. Victor, Victor, Victor & Hel-goe, L.L.P., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Lisa B. Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Joseph L. Hodge pleaded guilty to violating the terms of his supervised release. The district court entered an order revoking Hodge’s supervised release, and sentencing him to eleven months incarceration and twenty-five months of supervised release. Hodge’s counsel has filed an appeal under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting Hodge was not competent to participate in the proceeding. Hodge’s claim is meritless. Hodge cannot show he was *145unable to rationally consult with his lawyer, or unable to understand the proceeding against him. *Dusky v. United States,*362 U.S. 402, 402, 80 S.Ct. 788, 4 L.Ed.2d 824 (1960) (per curiam); *United States v. Mason,*52 F.3d 1286, 1289 (4th Cir.1995).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court order. *United States v. Hodge,*No. CR-02-19 (M.D.N.C. July 2, 2002). In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the entire record in this case and find no other meritorious issues for appeal. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client.

*AFFIRMED.*
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 4966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; NSF Program--EDGE Research.
    Date: February 5, 2024.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Human Genome Research Institute, National 
Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 
(Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Rudy O. Pozzatti, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome Research 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 
6908, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-8739, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e1e0114140f1a1a1c2e030f07024000070640090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d7d6277776c79797f4d606c646123636465236a627b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 22, 2024.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-01425 Filed 1-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

IN RE No. 08-15-00197-CV

§

MARIO ALONZO CISNEROS,

RELATOR.

§

§

§

An Original Proceeding

on Petition for 

Writ of Mandamus

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus 

against the Honorable Luis Aguilar, Judge of the 243rd District Court of El Paso County, Texas, 

and concludes Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be conditionally granted. We 

therefore direct the trial court to withdraw the bench warrant issued on June 29, 2015, in 

accordance with the opinion of this Court. The writ of mandamus will issue should the trial 

court fail to comply.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 9, 2021

No. 04-21-00256-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.A., N.Y.M.H.A. AND D.M.A., CHILDREN,

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA01667

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

A copy of appellant’s notice of appeal was filed in this court on June 23, 2021. In 

accordance with section 51.017(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, a notice of 

appeal must be served on each court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record. 

TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.017(a).

The clerk of the court notified the appellant in writing that the certificate of service 

attached to the notice of appeal filed in this appeal does not certify that any court reporter was 

served. The clerk instructed the appellant to file an amended notice of appeal certifying proper 

service on the responsible court reporter(s). An amended notice of appeal has not been filed.

It is therefore ORDERED that Misty Deatherage file an amended notice of appeal in 

compliance with section 51.017(a) on or before July 19, 2021.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of July, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-41110 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. DIOGENES ASCENCIO-LEMUS, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:10-CR-426-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointe d t o represent Diogenes AscencioLemus has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ascencio-Lemus has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and t h e relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate revi e w . Ac c o rdingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 16, 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-41110 Document: 00511573857 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2011No. 10-41110

G RANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, a n d t h e APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 10-41110 Document: 00511573857 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2011
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF MAX RE CAPITAL LTD.**

This certification is providedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A (the “Form 10-Q/A”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 of Max Re Capital Ltd. (the“Issuer”). 

I, W. Marston Becker, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that: 

(i) the Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Issuer. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuerand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

Dated: November 15, 2006
Stephen E. Earle MD and 

Stephen E. Earle MD 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 16, 2014

No. 04-13-00753-CV

Robert SCHRADE,

Appellant

v.

Stephen E. EARLE MD and Stephen E. Earle MD PA,

Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-03779

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Motion for Leave to File Amended Brief is GRANTED. Appellee’s 

amended brief is due no later than April 18, 2014.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of April, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001011976
<NAME> ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                        40
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      40
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                        (60)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        40
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 Date: August 14, 2008
    By:
    /s/ KELLY ANDERSONKELLY ANDERSONExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 22-20628 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee , versus David Penaloza-Nieto, Defendant—Appellant . ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CR-224-1

______________________________ Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges . Per Curiam: *The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent David PenalozaNieto has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Penaloza-Nieto has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record.

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 23, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-20628 Document: 00516868708 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/23/2023No. 22-20628

2 We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Ac cordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED . See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 22-20628 Document: 00516868708 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/23/2023
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 16.1


                                KENNETH E. WALSH
                          Certified Public Accountant
                       3820 Del Amo Boulevard, Suite 305
                          Torrance, California  90503
                      (310) 793-7005 o FAX (310) 791-0189





October 17, 1996



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


         Re:     Global Outdoors, Inc. (Registrant) 
                 Commission File Number 0-17287


Ladies and Gentlemen:

I agree with the statements made by the above Registrant in Item 4 of its
Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 15,1996.


                                        /s/ Kenneth E. Walsh
                                        ----------------------
                                            Kenneth E. Walsh
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 DISCOVER BANK, 

3 Plaintiff-Appellant,

4 v. No. 32,257

5 JONATHAN N. McGEE,

6 Defendant-Appellee,

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY

8 Alan M. Malott, District Judge

9 Travis J. White

10 Albuquerque, NM

11 for Appellant

12 Jonathan N. McGee

13 Albuquerque, NM

14 Pro Se Appellee

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION

16 FRY, Judge.

17 Plaintiff is appealing from a district court order denying its motion for

18 reconsideration of a judgment dismissing its civil complaint with prejudice. We
2

1 issued a calendar notice proposing to dismiss. Plaintiff has responded with a timely

2 memorandum in opposition. Not persuaded, we dismiss the appeal.

3 As we observed in our calendar notice, Plaintiff is appealing from a district

4 court order denying its motion for reconsideration of a judgment dismissing its

5 complaint with prejudice. The order denying the motion for reconsideration was filed

6 on June 12, 2012. [RP 116] Pursuant to Rule 12-201(D) NMRA, Plaintiff had thirty

7 days from that date to file its notice of appeal. Our calendar notice proposed to

8 dismiss because Plaintiff filed its notice of appeal in the district court on July 13,

9 2012, one day late. [RP 118]

10 In its memorandum in opposition, Plaintiff asserts that it timely filed its notice

11 of appeal on July 12, 2012. However, that file date is taken from the copy served on

12 this Court. As noted, the district court’s file stamp reads July 13, 2012. [RP 118] See

13 Rule 12-202(A) NMRA (stating that the notice of appeal should be filed with the

14 district court clerk). As such, Plaintiff has not complied with a mandatory

15 precondition to the exercise of our appellate jurisdiction to consider the merits of the

16 appeal. See Govich v. North Am. Sys., Inc., 112 N.M. 226, 230, 814 P.2d 94, 98

17 (1991) (compliance with notice of appeal time and place requirements are mandatory

18 preconditions to exercise of appellate jurisdiction). Accordingly, we dismiss the

19 appeal.
3

1 IT IS SO ORDERED.

2 

3 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

4

5 WE CONCUR:

6 

7 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 

8 

9 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge