alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed September 21, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1363

Lower Tribunal No. F93-30742B

________________

Recondall Wiggins,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina Miranda, Judge.

Recondall Wiggins, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kayla Heather McNab, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before MILLER, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See York v. State, 313 So. 3d 707, 709 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) 

(“Where a sentence has been completed, any errors in that sentence are 

typically rendered moot.”).
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York,<br><br>against<br><br>Dave Lewis, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Heidi C. Cesare, J.), rendered October 25, 2018, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of failure to exercise due care to avoid collision with a bicyclist and failure to yield to a bicyclist, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Heidi C. Cesare, J.), rendered October 25, 2018, affirmed.</p><p>For the reasons stated in our decision in <i>People v Torres</i>, __ Misc 3d __, 2019 NY Slip Op 29292 [App Term, 1st Dept 2019]), we reject defendant's arguments that Administrative Code of City of the New York ยง 19-190(b) is preempted by state law and unconstitutional for using a civil negligence standard as a basis for criminal liability.</p><p>Defendant's legal sufficiency claim is unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. We also find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (<a href="../2007/2007_09814.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Danielson</i>, 9 NY3d 342</a>, 348โ��349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations. The totality of the credible evidence, including surveillance videotapes of the accident resulting in the death of a cyclist, warranted the conclusion that defendant bus driver failed to exercise due care and failed to yield the right of way to the cyclist.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur<i><br>Decision Date: October 24, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></i></partyblock>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUI T

________________________ No s . 18

- 11480 ; 18

- 11482 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No s . 1:01

- cr - 00494

- FAM

- 1, 1:01

- cr - 00730

- FAM

- 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,
versus ROBERT BEAUCHAMP, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

________________________ (October 11, 2018) B efore WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges
. PER CURIAM : The Government ’ s motion to dismiss th ese appeal s pursuant to the appeal waiver s in Appellant ’ s plea agreement s is GRANTED. See United States v.

Case: 18-11480 Date Filed: 10/11/2018 Page: 1 of 22 Bushert , 997 F.2d 1343, 1350

- 51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Bascomb , 451 F.3d 1292, 1297 (11th Cir. 2006) (appeal waiver “ cannot be vitiated or alter ed by comments the court makes during sentencing ” ); United States v. Grinard

- Henry , 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error). 1

1 The government’s motion to stay briefing is DENIED AS MOOT. Case: 18-11480 Date Filed: 10/11/2018 Page: 2 of 2
#### M. E. ROBERTS et al., Appellants, v. Charles C. WINE, Receiver.

No. 11497.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Sept. 8, 1939.

J. N. Saye, W. T. Saye, and W. Edward Lee, all of Longview, Tex., for appellants.

Will Steel, H. M. Barney, and Frank S. Quinn, all of Texarkana, Ark., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed as to appellants, M. E. Roberts, A. D. Roberts, J. N. Roberts and L. E. Roberts, on their motion.
----

----

I Aktid, mille avaldamine on kohustuslik

----

EUROOPA PARLAMENDI JA NÕUKOGU MÄÄRUS (EÜ) nr 1992/2006,

18. detsember 2006,

millega muudetakse nõukogu määrust (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 sotsiaalkindlustusskeemide kohaldamise kohta ühenduse piires liikuvate töötajate, füüsilisest isikust ettevõtjate ja nende pereliikmete suhtes

(EMPs kohaldatav tekst)

EUROOPA PARLAMENT JA EUROOPA LIIDU NÕUKOGU,

võttes arvesse Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingut, eriti selle artikleid 42 ja 308,

võttes arvesse komisjoni ettepanekut,

võttes arvesse Euroopa Majandus- ja Sotsiaalkomitee arvamust, (1)

toimides asutamislepingu artiklis 251 sätestatud korras (2)

ning arvestades järgmist:

ON VASTU VÕTNUD KÄESOLEVA MÄÄRUSE:

Artikkel 1

Määruse (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 I, II, IIa, III, IV ja VI lisa muudetakse vastavalt käesoleva määruse lisale.

Artikkel 2

Käesolev määrus jõustub kolmandal päeval pärast selle avaldamist Euroopa Liidu Teatajas.

Lisa punkti 1 alapunkti b ja punkti 6 alapunkti b seoses Madalmaadega kohaldatakse alates 1. jaanuarist 2006, välja arvatud määruse (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 VI lisa jao “Q. MADALMAAD” punkti 1 alapunkti f kuuendat taanet, nagu lisatud käesoleva määruse lisa punkti 6 alapunktiga b, mida kohaldatakse alates käesoleva artikli esimeses lõigus nimetatud kuupäevast.

Käesolev määrus on tervikuna siduv ja vahetult kohaldatav kõikides liikmesriikides.

Strasbourg, 18. detsember 2006.

Euroopa Parlamendi nimel

president

J. BORRELL FONTELLES

Nõukogu nimel

eesistuja

J.-E. ENESTAM

----

(1)  13. detsembri 2006. aasta arvamus (Euroopa Liidu Teatajas seni avaldamata).

(2)  Euroopa Parlamendi 14. novembri 2006. aasta arvamus (Euroopa Liidu Teatajas seni avaldamata) ja nõukogu 18. detsembri 2006. aasta otsus.

----

LISA

Määruse (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 lisasid muudetakse järgmiselt.

----
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of our report datedJuly 16, 2007 (except for Note 13 as to which the date is July 23, 2007) related to the consolidated financialstatements of eyeonics, inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption ofStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” in 2006) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for each of the three years inthe period ended December 31, 2006, appearing in the prospectus, which is part of this RegistrationStatement and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such prospectus./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPCosta Mesa, California
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Melissa Leigh Browder, * From the 142nd District

Court of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR39127.

Vs. No. 11-14-00023-CR * October 9, 2014

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has considered Melissa Leigh Browder’s motion for nonsuit and 

dismissal of her appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in 

accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
**EXHIBIT32**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Annual Report of TitanPharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for theperiod ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Louis R. Bucalo, M.D.,Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best ofmy knowledge:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periodcertified.

Signedat the City of South San Francisco, in the State of California, this 15th dayof April, 2005.
|        |   | /s/ LOUIS R. BUCALO    |
|--------|--------|------------------------|
|   |   | Louis R. Bucalo,  M.D. |

 

In connection with the Annual Report of TitanPharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for theperiod ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert E. Farrell, J.D.,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best ofmy knowledge:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periodcertified.

Signedat the City of South San Francisco, in the State of California, this 15th dayof April, 2005.
|        |   | /s/ ROBERT E. FARRELL    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|   |   | Robert E.  Farrell, J.D. |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 13 (Friday, January 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3652-3653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00960]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-11669-01-OA]


Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities Advisory Committee (FRRCC); 
Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), notice 
is hereby given that the next meeting of the Farm, Ranch, and Rural 
Communities Advisory Committee (FRRCC) will be held in-person and 
virtually January 30-31, 2024. The FRRCC provides independent policy 
advice, information, and recommendations to the Administrator on a 
range of environmental issues and policies that are of importance to 
agriculture and rural communities.

DATES: This meeting will be held in-person and virtually Tuesday, 
January 30, 2024-Wednesday, January 31, 2024, from approximately 8:00 
a.m. until 5:00 p.m. (MST).
    This meeting will take place in-person and virtually. To register 
and receive information on how to listen to the meeting and to provide 
comments, please visit: www.epa.gov/faca/frrcc. Attendees must register 
online to receive instructions for virtual attendance.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 330 E Palace Avenue, Santa Fe, 
NM 87501.
    Virtual Attendance: Virtual attendance will be via Zoom. The link 
to register for the meeting can be found on the FRRCC web page: 
www.epa.gov/faca/frrcc.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Venus Welch-White, Designated Federal 
Officer (DFO), at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a5e3f7f7e6e6e5c0d5c48bc2cad3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="783e2a2a3b3b381d0819561f170e">[email protected]</span></a> or 202-566-2369. General information 
regarding the FRRCC can be found on the EPA website at: www.epa.gov/faca/frrcc.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meetings of the FRRCC are open to the 
public. An agenda will be posted at www.epa.gov/faca/frrcc.
    Access and Accommodations: For information on access or services 
for individuals with disabilities, please visit: www.epa.gov/faca/frrcc.
    Due to unforeseen administrative circumstances, EPA is announcing 
this

[[Page 3653]]

meeting with less than 15 calendar days public notice.

Rodney Snyder,
Senior Advisor for Agriculture, U.S. EPA.
[FR Doc. 2024-00960 Filed 1-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

            POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUPM/1/2006

of 5 December 2006         

extending the mandate of the Head of Mission/Police Commissioner of the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH)

(2006/979/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular the third paragraph of Article 25 thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2005/824/CFSP of 24 November 2005 on the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) (1), and, in particular, Article 9(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The mandate of Brigadier General Vincenzo COPPOLA is hereby extended as Head of Mission/Police Commissioner of the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), until 31 December 2007.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

It shall apply until 31 December 2007.

Done at Brussels, 5 December 2006.

For the Political and Security Committee

The President

T. TANNER            

----

(1)OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 55.

(2)OJ L 335, 21.12.2005, p. 58.

----
Exhibit 23 

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Trimeris, Inc. 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.333-44145, No. 333-44147, No. 333-64064, No. 333-66401, No. 333-74304, No. 333-90377 and No. 333-107508) on Forms S-8 and the Registration Statements (No. 333-31662, No. 333-60724, No. 333-76689, No. 333-81708 and No. 333-98587) on Forms S-3 ofTrimeris, Inc. of our report dated February 3, 2004, with respect to the balance sheets of Trimeris, Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years inthe three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of Trimeris, Inc. 

 

**/s/ KPMG LLP**

 

Raleigh, North Carolina 

March 10, 2004
#### ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE, DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS, HOMER C. ZINK, STATE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE OF NEW JERSEY, AND FRANK E. WALSH, DIRECTOR DIVISION OF TAXATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. THE NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, AND THE COMPANIES COMPRISING ITS SYSTEM, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE, DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS, AND HOMER C. ZINK, COMMISSIONER OF SAID DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Argued December 20, 1948

Decided January 17, 1949.

*299
      *Mr. Edward A. Markley*argued the cause for the prosecutor-appellant, Erie Railroad Company *(Messrs. Markley & Broad*hurst, attorneys).

*Mr. Benjamin C. Van Tine*argued the cause for the defendants-respondents *(Mr. Walter D. Van Riper,*Attorney-General of New Jersey).

*Mr. Joseph A. Davis*argued the cause for the prosecutor-appellant, The New York Central Railroad Company and the companies comprising its Sj'stem *(Messrs. O’Mara, Conway & Schumann,*attorneys).

*Mr. Benjamin C. Van Tine*argued the cause for the defendants-respondents *(Mr. Walter D. Van Riper,*Attorney-General of New Jersey).

Per Curiam.

These appeals are from judgments of the former Supreme Court, which judgments affirm the judgments of the State Department of Taxation and Finance, Division of Tax Appeals confirming assessments for the year 1945 upon certain floating equipment consisting of ferry boats, tugs, lighters, etc., the property of appellants. The judgments in question are affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Eastwood in the former Supreme Court reported in 137 *N. J. L.*288 (U948J.

*300Subsequent to the rendition of the opinion below, the Supreme Court of the United States denied *certiorari*in the case of *Debardeleben Coal Corp. v. Ott,*334 *U. S.*858, 92 L. *Ed.*1479, 68 S. *Ct.*1529 *(1948).*The facts in that case, as set forth in the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, 166 *Fed. 2d*509 (1948) resemble those in the instant case and the precedent is applicable to the Federal questions here involved and the opinion supports the reasoning of the Court below. While the action of the United States Supreme Court imports no opinion on the merits, *(Sunal v. Large,*332 *U. S.*174, 67 *S. Ct.*1588, 91 L. *Ed.*1982 *(1946),*re-hearing denied 332 *U. S.*785, *68.S. Ct. 29, 92 L. Ed.*38 *(1947); House v. Mayo,*324 *U. S.*42, 65 S. *Ct.*517, 89 *L. Ed.*739 *(1945),*re-hearing denied 324 *U.*S. 886, 65 S. *Ct.*689, 89 *L. Ed.*1435 *(1945),*its action denotes finality to the case. 28 *U.*S. *C. A. Sec.*1254.

*For affirmance:*Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Heher, Oliphant, Wachenkeld, Burling, and Ackerson—7.

*For reversal:*None.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Michael N. Chang, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Optimer Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), and John D.Prunty, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that,to the best of his knowledge:

 
| 1.     |   | The Company’s Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, to which  this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Quarterly Report”),  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or  Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2.     |   | The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by  the Quarterly Report and results of operations of the Company for the period  covered by the Quarterly Report.                                                               |

 

Dated: May 8, 2009

 
| /s/ Michael N. Chang                                   |   | /s/ John D. Prunty                                                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Michael N. Chang                                       |   | John D. Prunty                                                        |
| Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer) |   | Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

This certificationaccompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before orafter the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 21
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 Subsidiary
    
    State or Country of Incorporation/FormationDigene do Brasil LTDA
    
    BrazilDigene Europe, Inc.
    
    DelawareDigene (Switzerland) Sarl
    
    SwitzerlandDigene UK (Holdings) Limited
    
    United KingdomDigene Diagnostics S.L.*
    
    SpainDigene Deutschland GmbH*
    
    GermanyDigene (France) S.A.S.*
    
    FranceDigene (Italia) s.r.l.*
    
    ItalyDigene (UK) Limited*
    
    United Kingdom
 
 *
    
    Wholly owned subsidiary of Digene UK (Holdings) Limited
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. AF 07

- 0 110

______________ IN RE REVISIONS TO THE ) UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES ) O R D E R )

**_____________** Following submission to the Court of a comment letter from CompuLaw, “the Court Rules Company,” and the Court’s referral of that letter to the Uniform District Court Rules Commission, the Commission ha srecommended that changes be made to Uniform District Court Rule 2 for purposes of clarification. We approve the proposed minor chan ge s. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that subsections (a) and (e) of Uniform District Court Rule 2 are
rev ised as follows. S ubsection s (a) and (e) are set forth below with new language underlined; language deleted is interlineated: (a) Upon filing a motion or within five days thereafter, the moving party shall file a brief. The brief ma y be accompanied by appropriate supporting documents. Within ten days thereafter af ter service of the movant’s brief , the adverse opposing

p arty shall file an answer brief whichalso ma y be accompanied by appropriate supporting documents. Within ten days thereafter after service of the opposing party’s answer brief, themo vant may file a reply brief or other appropriate responsive documents.

. . . . . (e) I n the event of conflict, the Montana Rules of Civil Procedure shall control. Time computation shall be governed by Rule 6 (a) , M. R. Civ. P.
The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the State Law Library, all DistrictCourt

Judges of the State of Mont ana, each member of the Uniform District Court Rules Commission, the State Bar of Montana, Thomson

- Reuters, CompuLaw, and Lee Heiman at the Montana Legislative Services Division
**.** DATED this 19 th

day of Ju ly , 20 1 1

. July 19 20112 /S/ MIKE McGRATH /S/ BETH BAKER /S/ PATRICIA COTTER /S/ MICHAEL E WHEAT /S/ BRIAN MORRIS /S/ JAMES C. NELSON /S/ JIM RICE
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.43




 


AMENDMENT TO LEASE


 


This Third Amendment to the Lease (the “Third Amendment”), made this 28th day of October, 2011, between Stan Checketts Properties, LC (“Landlord”) and Boomerang Sub, Inc. (“Tenant”), modifies and amends the monthly paid and accrued rent and term of this lease, effective October 1, 2011.







In consideration of the mutual promises and agreements exchanged, Lender and Borrower agree as follows:








	
  

	
1.

	
Monthly Rent.  The monthly rent shall be $14,940.00













	
  

	
2.

	
Monthly Paid Rent.  The monthly paid rent shall be $14,940.00.












Nothing in this Third Amendment shall be understood or construed to be a satisfaction or release in whole or in part of the lease.







In Witness Whereof, Lender and Borrower have executed this Agreement.








	
/s/ Stan Checketts

	 	
/s/ Christopher Mulvihill


	
Stan Checketts Properties, LC

	 	
Boomerang Sub, Inc.


	
By: Stan Checketts

	 	
Christopher Mulvihill


	
Title: Owner

	 	
President













	
MULTISTATE LOAN MODIFICATION AGREEMENT (To a Fixed Interest Rate)—Single Family—Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT

	
Form 5161


	
3/04  

	
(page 1 of 1 pages)