alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4314-4315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01156]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-1262]


Notice of Approval of Product Under Voucher: Rare Pediatric 
Disease Priority Review Voucher

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
issuance of approval of a product redeeming a priority review voucher. 
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) authorizes FDA to 
award priority review vouchers to sponsors of approved rare pediatric 
disease product applications that meet certain criteria. FDA is 
required to publish notice of the issuance of priority review vouchers 
as well as the approval of products redeeming a priority review 
voucher. FDA has determined that XYWAV (calcium, magnesium, potassium, 
and sodium oxybates), approved July 21, 2020, meets the criteria for 
redeeming a priority review voucher.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathryn Lee, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-1394, email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8ebc9dcc0dad1c686e4cdcde8ceccc986c0c0db86cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="783b190c100a011656341d1d381e1c195610100b561f170e">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is announcing the approval of a product 
redeeming a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher. Under 
section 529 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360ff), FDA will report the 
issuance of rare pediatric disease priority review vouchers and the 
approval of products for which a voucher was redeemed. FDA has 
determined that XYWAV (calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium 
oxybates) meets the redemption criteria.

[[Page 4315]]

    For further information about the Rare Pediatric Disease Priority 
Review Voucher Program and for a link to the full text of section 529 
of the FD&C Act, go to https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DevelopingProductsforRareDiseasesConditions/RarePediatricDiseasePriorityVoucherProgram/default.htm. For further 
information about XYWAV (calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium 
oxybates), go to the ``Drugs@FDA'' website at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/.

    Dated: January 17, 2024.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-01156 Filed 1-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
TS-G050GW Attachment 2 Page 1/1 

## Chemical structure diagram CBI
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1507

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 27 (legislative day, DECEMBER 22), 1995

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To provide for the extension of the Parole Commission to

oversee cases of prisoners sentenced under prior law,

to reduce the size of the Parole Commission, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1507 RFH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Parole Commission

3 Phaseout Act of 1995’’.

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PAROLE COMMISSION.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of section 235(b)(1)

6 of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (98 Stat. 2032)

7 as it related to chapter 311 of title 18, United States

8 Code, and the Parole Commission, each reference in such

9 section to ‘‘ten years’’ or ‘‘ten-year period’’ shall be

10 deemed to be a reference to ‘‘fifteen years’’ or ‘‘fifteen11 year period’’, respectively.

12 (b) POWERS AND DUTIES OF PAROLE COMMIS13 SION.—Notwithstanding section 4203 of title 18, United

14 States Code, the United States Parole Commission may

15 perform its functions with any quorum of Commissioners,

16 or Commissioner, as the Commission may prescribe by

17 regulation.

18 SEC. 3. REPEAL.

19 Section 235(b)(2) of the Sentencing Reform Act of

20 1984 (98 Stat. 2032) is repealed.

Passed the Senate December 22, 1995.

Attest: KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

Secretary.
<PAGE>


                                                            Exhibit No. 23.1




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 
33-3-3040, 333-67581, 333-67581-01, 333-67581-02, 333-67581-03 and 
333-67581-04 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements Nos. 33-3-3042, 
33-3-3044 and 333-27987 on Form S-8 of UnionBanCal Corporation of our report 
dated March 3, 1999, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of 
UnionBanCal Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1998.



San Francisco, California

March 26, 1999
exh10-46.htm










 


Exhibit 10.46


 


CERTIFICATE OF GRANT OF PATENT



 


Patents Ordinance (Chapter 514)


 



SHORT-TERM PATENT


 














 


I hereby certify that a short-term patent with the following particulars has this day been granted:


 


Name and Address of Proprietor:


 


Mr. Wei Lin


 


China


 


Chenghai District, Shantou City, Guangdong Province


 


1 Yuting Rd., Zhulingting, Fengxiang Street


 







 


Patent No.: HK 1133784                                                                                     Application No.: 09111921.2


 


Title of Invention:


 


ASSEMBLED TOY PLUG-IN BLOCKS


 







 


Term of Short-term Patent:


 


Eight years commencing on 18.12.2009


 







 


Dated this 1st April, 2010


 


(Signature)


 







 


/s/ Stephen Selby


 


Patents Registry                                                                                     Registrar of Patents


 


Intellectual Property Department


 


The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
**Exhibit 32.2** **CERTIFICATION    OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER**      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the    undersigned officer of Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors,    LLC, the Manager of NNN 2002 Value Fund, LLC (the    “Company”) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007    (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.        March 11, 2008
#### CASHMAN v. TULSA CITY LINES, Inc. et al.

No. 35920.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Jan. 19, 1954.

T. Austin Gavin, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Truman B. Rucker, B. W. Tabor, Joseph M. Best, Tulsa, for defendants in error.

ARNOLD, Justice.

Mary Cashman brought this action in the District Court of Tulsa County alleging that she had sustained severe personal injuries while alighting from a bus owned and operated by Tulsa City Lines by reason of the negligence of the driver of said bus in starting said bus before she had safely reached the pavement, throwing her out of the bus and onto the ground.

Defendant bus line filed its general denial and alleged that the accident and plaintiff’s resulting injuries occurred by reason of her contributory negligence in failing to keep a proper lookout for her own safety while alighting from the bus, in permitting her coat to drag on the bus steps causing her to trip and fall, and in failing to hold onto the handrail while alighting.

At the close of the evidence the court, among other things, gave an instruction on contributory negligence. Verdict of the jury was for defendant and judgment was entered thereon. Plaintiff appeals here making the sole contention that the court erred as a matter of law in giving an instruction on contributory negligence inasmuch, she says, no contributory negligence on her part was proved.

Pertinent to this single issue the evidence of plaintiff shows nothing that smacks of contributory negligence. The evidence of defendant shows that at the hospital where plaintiff was taken immediately after her fall she told the investigating police officers that she had “misjudged her footing” and at the time of her fall the bus was standing still; that she told the driver of the bus immediately after her fall that she had “misjudged her step”; that the bus did not move until after her fall; that plaintiff had hold of the handrail as she started to alight from- the bus, had taken one step down, then seemed to miss her footing and fell forward out of the bus alighting on her left shoulder and side.

Plaintiff contends that this evidence does not support any of the specific acts of contributory negligence alleged by defendant. It is true that there is no evidence that plaintiff tripped on her coat or *1093that she failed to use the handrail. However, the evidence of defendant that she said she “misjudged her step” in alighting from the bus is sufficient to raise the question of whether she did in fact keep a proper lookout for her own safety by watching where she was stepping in alighting from the bus. This was a question of fact for the jury and was submitted to it under a proper instruction. See Yellow Taxicab & Baggage Co. v. Cooke, 171 Okl. 269, 42 P. 2d 826. The case of Miller v. Price, 168 Okl. 452, 33 P.2d 624, is not in point here.

Affirmed.

HALLEY, C. J., JOHNSON, V. C. J., and CORN, O’NEAL, WILLIAMS, and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur.
II

Calendar No. 396

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1627

[Report No. 104–262]

To designate the visitor center at Jean Lafitte National Historical Park

in New Orleans, Louisiana as the ‘‘Laura C. Hudson Visitor Center’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 20, 1996

Mr. JOHNSTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

MAY 9, 1996

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

A BILL

To designate the visitor center at Jean Lafitte National

Historical Park in New Orleans, Louisiana as the

‘‘Laura C. Hudson Visitor Center’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LAURA C. HUDSON VISITOR CENTER.

4 The visitor center at Jean Lafitte National Historical

5 Park, located at 419 Rue Decatur in New Orleans, Louisi-
2

S 1627 RS

1 ana, is hereby designated as the ‘‘Laura C. Hudson Visitor

2 Center’’.

3 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

4 Any reference in any law, regulation, paper, record,

5 map, or any other document of the United States to the

6 visitor center referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed

7 to be a reference to the ‘‘Laura C. Hudson Visitor Cen8 ter’’.

Calendar No. 396

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1627

[Report No. 104–262]

A BILL

To designate the visitor center at Jean Lafitte Naas the ‘‘Laura C. Hudson Visitor Center’’. tional Historical Park in New Orleans, Louisiana

MAY 9, 1996

Reported without amendment
SERVED: MAY 22, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

'

7. n~. 1,1 · "'t . - - .,~: I 

IN THE MATTER OF 

TGIFREIGHT 

FAADOCKETNO. CP10NM0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010- 1079 

NOTICE OF HEARING DATES 

1: 3 Lt 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

the week of September 20 and 21, 2012, at the U.S. District Court for the District of 

Alaska, 222 W. 7th Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska 99513. 

Hearings will commence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. The parties 

should vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00p.m. each day. Settled cases will not be 

removed from the docket until the Judge receives the proper pleading(s). Pleadings 

may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or postal service. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Rebecca J. Hozubin, Respondent's Counsel 

Wilkerson Hozubin 

310 K Street, Suite 405 

Anchorage, AK 99501 

TEL: 907-276-5297 

FAX: 907-276-5291 

ONE COPY 

HowardL. Martin, Jr., Complainant's Counsel 

Regional Counsel, Office of Regional Counsel, AAL-7 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration· 

222 W. 71

h Avenue # 14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5273 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office ofHearings, M-20, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.(Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 ... 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Staff Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FAA Docket No. CPIONM0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### COMMERCE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, A Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Nick STUTES, Defendant in Error.

No. 36323.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Dec. 14, 1954.

Ungerman, Whitebook, Grabel & Unger-man, William Leiter, Tulsa,, for plaintiff in error.

Wallace & Wallace, Sapulpa, for defendant in error.

O’NEAL, Justice.

On the 15th day of January, 1954, plaintiff in error filed case-made with petition in error in this court and on May 1, 1954, filed its brief. The authorities cited therein reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has failed to file a brief or offer any excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances it is not the duty of this court to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment of the trial court may be sus*996tained, but may, where the authorities cited in the brief appear reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, reverse the cause with directions. Durham v. Brown, 164 Okl. 139, 24 P.2d 295.

The cause is reversed and remanded with directions to vacate the judgment entered for defendant and enter order granting plaintiff a new trial.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.28
 ***Text Omitted and Filed Separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Confidential Treatment Requested
Under 17 C.F.R. Sections 200.80(b)(4)
and 240.24b-2.
  
   1.
    
    Allocation Schedule. Notwithstanding any provision of Section 1.7 of the Agreement,
Buyer and Seller agree that Buyer shall prepare and deliver to Seller the Allocation as
promptly as practicable but in no event later than the day that [...***...] after the Closing
Date. The Allocation shall become final and binding on the parties, unless Seller notifies
Buyer within fifteen (15) days after receipt of such Allocation of Sellers disagreement with
such Allocation. In the event Seller timely notifies Buyer of such disagreement, the parties
shall resolve such disagreement in the manner described in Section 9.3 of the Agreement. All
provisions of Section 1.7 of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as modified
hereby.
 2.
    
    Additional Assumed Contracts. The parties agree that [...***...], shall be deemed to be set forth in
Section 1.1(a)(iv) of the Seller Disclosure Letter. The parties further agree that [...***...], shall be deemed to be set forth in Section
1.1(a)(iv) of the Seller Disclosure Letter.
 3.
    
    Reference to Exhibits in the Agreement. The parties agree that each of the Bill of
Sale, the General Assignment, the Patent Assignment, the Trademark Assignment and the
non-foreign person certificate referenced in Section 2.2(e) of the Agreement to be delivered
at Closing pursuant to Sections 2.2 and 2.3 of the Agreement shall be substantially in the
forms attached to the Agreement as Exhibit B, Exhibit C, Exhibit D, Exhibit E and
Exhibit F, respectively. The parties acknowledge that the foregoing exhibits are incorrectly
referenced in Section 2.2 of the Agreement as Exhibit C, Exhibit D, Exhibit E, Exhibit F and
Exhibit G, respectively.
 4.
    
    Section 5.10(b)(i)(A) and Section 5.10(b)(i)(B) of the Seller Disclosure Letter.
Attached as Annex 1and Annex 2hereto are Section 5.10(b)(i)(A) and Section
5.10(b)(i)(B) of the Seller Disclosure Letter updated as of the close of business on
January 11, 2008. The
 ***Confidential
Treatment Requested
 1.




---



##### 



parties agree that Seller shall not be required to update Section
5.10(b)(i)(A) and Section 5.10(b)(i)(B) of the Seller Disclosure Letter for any
event or change occurring after January 11, 2008.
 5.
    
    Miscellaneous.
        2.




---



##### 



Sincerely,
Valeant Pharmaceuticals North AmericaBy:

/s/Timothy C. TysonName:
    Timothy
C. TysonTitle:

President
and CEO Accepted and Agreed
Three Rivers Pharmaceuticals, LLCBy:

/s/Donald J. KerrishName:
    Donald
J. KerrishTitle:
    President and CEO 3.




---



##### 



Annex 1
 Section 5.10(b)(i)(A)
  ***Confidential
Treatment Requested
 4.




---



##### 



Annex 2
 Section 5.10(b)(i)(B)
  
 ***Confidential
Treatment Requested
 5.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID** 06943 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### 06943\06943_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 06943\06943_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 06943\06943_Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 06943\06943_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 06943\06943_PART A.xls Plant submitted survey file

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5130 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit the Secretary of a military 

department to grant veterans access to certain fitness centers under 

the jurisdiction of such Secretary, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2018 

Ms. TENNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit the Secretary of a military department to grant veterans access 

to certain fitness centers under the jurisdiction of such 

Secretary, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Veterans Ac5 cess to Military Fitness Facilities Act of 2018’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5130 IH

1 SEC. 2. ACCESS FOR VETERANS TO CERTAIN FITNESS CEN2 TERS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 152 of title 10, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing new section: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 2569. FITNESS CENTERS: ACCESS FOR VETERANS. 

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), the 

8 Secretary of a military department may grant veterans ac9 cess to a fitness center that— 

10 ‘‘(1) is under the jurisdiction of such Secretary; 

11 and 

12 ‘‘(2) is operated by a geographically separated 

13 unit that is located not less than 100 miles from the 

14 supporting base of such unit. 

15 ‘‘(b) FACTORS FOR CONSIDERATION.—In deter16 mining whether to grant veterans access to a fitness center 

17 under subsection (a), the Secretary concerned shall con18 sider— 

19 ‘‘(1) whether the commander who oversees the 

20 fitness center has determined— 

21 ‘‘(A) that such fitness center has the ca22 pacity and infrastructure required to support 

23 veterans; and 

24 ‘‘(B) that granting veterans such access 

25 would not impede the readiness of members of 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5130 IH

1 the armed forces on active duty who use the fit2 ness center; 

3 ‘‘(2) the effect that granting veterans such ac4 cess would have on the operating and maintenance 

5 expenses of the fitness center; and 

6 ‘‘(3) any additional criteria determined by the 

7 Secretary concerned. 

8 ‘‘(c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘veteran’ 

9 has the meaning given such term in section 101 of title 

10 38.’’. 

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

12 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding 

13 at the end the following: 

‘‘2569. Fitness centers: access for veterans.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 The
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
 
 This 14th
day of November, 2008.
 
 
 /s/ Stephen D.
      BarnhillStephen
      D. Barnhill, M.D.Chief
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial
  Officer
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1659/2006

of 9 November 2006         

fixing the export refunds on syrups and certain other sugar products exported without further processing

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the market in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Export refunds as provided for in Article 32 of Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 shall be granted on the products and for the amounts set out in the Annex to this Regulation subject to the conditions provided for in paragraph 2 of this Article.

2.   To be eligible for a refund under paragraph 1 products must meet the relevant requirements laid down in Articles 3 and 4 of Regulation (EC) No 951/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 November 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 November 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 178, 1.7.2006, p. 24.

----

ANNEX

Export refunds on syrups and certain other sugar products exported without further processing applicable from 10 November 2006 (1)

----

(1)  The amounts set out in this Annex are not applicable with effect from 1 February 2005 pursuant to Council Decision 2005/45/EC of 22 December 2004 concerning the conclusion and application of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 as regards the provisions applicable to processed agricultural products (OJ L 23, 26.1.2005, p. 17).

(1)  The basic amount is not applicable to the product defined under point 2 of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3513/92 (OJ L 355, 5.12.1992, p. 12).

----