alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1622]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

    IN RECOGNITION OF THE OUTSTANDING WORK OF OUTLOOK NEBRASKA, INC.

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. LEE TERRY

                              of nebraska

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. TERRY. Mr. Speaker, today, I rise to recognize--Outlook Nebraska, 
Incorporated--an organization that I've had the pleasure of visiting 
and seeing firsthand the positive impact they have in the lives of so 
many. This organization is part of the AbilityOne Program, which 
enables more than 50,000 Americans and 3,300 wounded warriors 
nationwide, who are blinded or severely disabled, to work and provide 
products and services to federal and commercial customers.
  Today in America, seventy percent of blind and visually impaired 
working-aged adults are not employed. Opportunities provided by Outlook 
Nebraska and the AbilityOne Program have played an important role in 
bringing people with disabilities into the workforce. As one of 
Outlook's employees said to me, ``They looked at me for my abilities--
not my disability.''
  The AbilityOne Program affords Americans who are blind or disabled 
the opportunity to acquire job skills and training, receive good wages 
and benefits, and gain greater independence and a better quality of 
life. I applaud Outlook Nebraska and the work it does each day to open 
doors of opportunity for Americans who are blind or disabled.

                          ____________________
```
at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of anothercorporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against any liability assertedagainst him and incurred by him in any such capacity, or arising out of his status as such, whetheror not the Corporation would have the power or the obligation to indemnify him against suchliability under the Delaware General Corporation Law or the provisions of this Article Sixth.     4. The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided by, or granted pursuant to, thisArticle Sixth shall, unless otherwise provided when authorized or ratified, continue as to a personwho has ceased to be a director or officer and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executorsand administrators of such officer or director. The indemnification and advancement of expensesthat may have been provided to an employee or agent of the Corporation by action of the Board ofDirectors, pursuant to the last sentence of Paragraph 1 of this Article Sixth, shall, unlessotherwise provided when authorized or ratified, continue as to a person who has ceased to be anemployee or agent of the Corporation and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors andadministrators of such a person, after the time such person has ceased to be an employee or agentof the Corporation, only on such terms and conditions and to the extent determined by the Board ofDirectors in its sole discretion.     SEVENTH. A director of the Corporation shall not be liable to the Corporation or itsstockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except to the extentsuch exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not permitted under the Delaware GeneralCorporation Law as the same exists or may hereafter be amended. If the Delaware GeneralCorporation Law is amended after the effective date of this Certificate of Incorporation toauthorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors,then the liability of a director of the Corporation shall be eliminated or limited to the fullestextent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, as so amended.     Any amendment, modification or repeal of the foregoing paragraph shall not adversely affectany right or protection of a director of the Corporation hereunder in respect of any act oromission occurring prior to the time of such amendment, modification or repeal.     EIGHTH. Unless and except to the extent that the By-laws of the Corporation shall so require,the election of directors of the Corporation need not be by written ballot.
----

----

II Aktid, mille avaldamine ei ole kohustuslik

Komisjon

----

EÜ-EFTA KAUBAVAHETUSE FORMAALSUSTE LIHTSUSTAMISE ÜHISKOMITEE OTSUS nr 1/2006,

25. oktoober 2006,

millega muudetakse konventsiooni kaubavahetuse formaalsuste lihtsustamise kohta

(2006/919/EÜ)

ÜHISKOMITEE,

võttes arvesse 20. mai 1987. aasta konventsiooni kaubavahetuse formaalsuste lihtsustamise kohta, (1) (edaspidi “konventsioon”) eriti selle artikli 11 lõiget 3,

ning arvestades järgmist:

ON TEINUD JÄRGMISE OTSUSE:

Artikkel 1

1.   Konventsiooni I lisa muudetakse vastavalt A lisale.

2.   Konventsiooni II lisa muudetakse vastavalt B lisale.

Artikkel 2

1.   Käesolev otsus jõustub selle vastuvõtmise päeval.

2.   Määrust kohaldatakse alates 1. jaanuarist 2007.

Brüssel, 25. oktoober 2006

Ühiskomitee nimel

Eesistuja

Mirosław F. ZIELIŃSKI

----

(1)EÜT L 134, 22.5.1987, lk 2. Konventsiooni on viimati muudetud ühiskomitee otsusega nr 2/95 (EÜT L 117, 14.5.1996, lk 18).

----

A LISA

I lisa liiteid 1–4 muudetakse järgmiselt.

----

B LISA

II lisa 3. liidet muudetakse järgmiselt.

----
Deny Writ and Opinion Filed September 18, 2013 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-01184-CV IN RE JAMES M. FISHER II, Relator Original Proceeding from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-09-22733 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Myers Opinion by Justice FitzGerald Relator contends the trial judge erred in awardi ng real party in intere st interim attorney’s fees. The facts and issues are well known to the pa rties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator = s petition for writ of mandamus and LIFT the stay imposed by our order of August 29, 2013.

131184F.P05 KERRY P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

February 14, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00826

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.N.J., ET AL., CHILDREN,

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 01058 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to February 19, 2019.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed th e seal of the said court on this 14th day of February, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1633]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            IN RECOGNITION OF JOAN RECHNITZ AND BOB RECHNITZ

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. FRANK PALLONE, JR.

                             of new jersey

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. PALLONE. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize Joan Rechnitz and 
Bob Rechnitz for their work in preserving New Jersey's pristine natural 
habitats. Their work with the Monmouth Conservation Foundation has been 
instrumental in helping to ensure that all New Jerseyans are able to 
enjoy the picturesque beauty of our county and State for generations to 
come.
  Over the past 35 years, the Monmouth Conservation Foundation has 
worked to protect over 6,500 acres of land in Monmouth County. Joan and 
Bob Rechnitz have long been strong advocates and supporters of the 
foundation and the environment, which includes Bob's tenure as a member 
of the foundation's advisory board, and Joan's time as a board member 
of Monmouth County's ``Friends of the Parks'' organization. In addition 
to Joan and Bob Rechnitz's work with the Monmouth Conservation 
Foundation and ``Friends of the Parks,'' both have been actively 
involved in promoting the arts in Monmouth County. In 1994, Joan and 
Bob Rechnitz founded the Two River Theater Company in an effort to 
provide Monmouth County residents with educational and community 
programs aimed at promoting the appreciation and advancement of arts. 
Joan and Bob Rechnitz's work through the Two River Theater Company, the 
Monmouth Conservation Foundation, and Monmouth County ``Friends of the 
Parks'' has resulted in a greater appreciation of the environment and 
the arts. It is my pleasure to join the Monmouth Conservation 
Foundation in honoring their work in showcasing and promoting the 
appreciation of art in nature and nature in art.
  Mr. Speaker, please join me in leading this body in recognition of 
Joan and Bob Rechnitz for their work in artistic and environmental 
advocacy. I would like to extend my appreciation and gratitude for 
their work on behalf of Monmouth County, and I look forward to hearing 
of their future successes and endeavors.

                          ____________________
```
#### State *v.*John M. Mahanna and James Welch.

In an indictment for larceny of bank bills, “ *two banlc bills, of the value of ten dollars each, of the property of one John Moore”*is a sufficient description of the property alleged to be stolen.

Indictment for larceny of “ two bank bills of the national currency of the United States, for the payment of ten dollars each, and of the value of ten dollars each, of the property of one John Moore.” The defendants moved in arrest of judgment for insufficient description, in the indictment, of the property alleged to be stolen.

*Morrison, Stanley <& Claris*for defendants.

*Joseph B. Claris,*Solicitor, for the State,

cited 2 Arch. Cr. PI. & Pr. 854, 355 (7th ed. notes) ; *Rex*v. *Johnson,*3 M. & S. 540, 552, 553 ; *Com*v. *Richards,*1 Mass. 337; 2 East P. C. 602, 777 ; *State*v. *Kent,*3 Hawks 618; *State*v. *Cassell,*2 Har. & G. 407 ; *Com*v. *Mosely,*2 Ya. Cas. 154; *State*v. *Williams,*19 Ala. 15; *People*v. *Kent,*1 Doug. (Mich.) 42; Wharton Cr. L. § 324, 333; 18 U. S. Dig. 482, § 13; *Pyland*v. *State,*4 Sneed 357; 2 Leach Cr. L. 1103 ; 3 Chitty Cr. L. 947.

Doe, J.

The indictment is sufficient. No other description was necessary than “ two bank bills, of the value of ten dollars each, of the property of one John Moore.”

*Motion*denied.
U.S. Natural Gas Imports by Country

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_move_impc_s1_a.htm 15:38:47 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration Series Linkhttp://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n9100us2a.htm Series KeyN9100US2.A Year U.S. Natural Gas Imports MMcf 2012 3137789 2011 3468693 2010 3740757 2009 3751360 2008 3984101 2007 4607582 20064186281 2005 4341034 20044258558 2003 3943749 2002 4015463 2001 3976939 2000 3781603 1999 3585505 1998 3152058 1997 2994173 1996 2937413 1995 2841048 1994 2623839 1993 2350115 1992 2137504 1991 1773313 1990 1532259 1989 1381520 1988 1293812 1987 992532 1986 750449 1985 949715 1984 843060 1983 918407 1982 933336 1981 903949 1980 984767 1979 1253383 1978 965545 1977 1011002 1976 963768 1975 953008 1974 959285 1973 1032903
**EXHIBIT 10-k-2**Schedule identifying agreements, entered into between Conexant Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) andeach of the following persons, substantially identical to the Employment Agreement constitutingExhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period endedDecember 31, 1998.NameDaniel ArtusiLewis C. BrewsterKaren Roscher
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1566

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

MARSH GRASS TOO.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 with appropriate endorsement for employment in the

9 coastwise trade for the vessel MARSH GRASS TOO, hull

10 identification number AUKEV 51139K690.

Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1566

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

TOO.wise trade for the vessel MARSH GRASSpriate endorsement for employment in the coastissue a certificate of documentation with appro-
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.0

                   AWARENESS LETTER FROM INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

May 14, 2003

Board of Directors
Liquidmetal Technologies
100 North Tampa Street
Suite 3150
Tampa, Florida 33602

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Liquidmetal Technologies and subsidiaries for the period ended
March 31, 2003 as indicated in our report dated April 16, 2003; because we did
not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-101447 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Tampa, Florida
#### Ketter GORDON and Jack Pittman, Plaintiffs in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12167.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 14, 1955.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 9, 1955.

Walter Billingsley, Wewoka, for plaintiffs in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error. - ‘

JONES, Presiding Judge.

The defendants, Ketter Gordon and Jack' Pittman, were jointly charged in the County Court of Seminole County with' operating" and maintaining a public nuisance, were tried, found guilty and sentenced to serve 90 days in jail and pay a fine of $250 and have appealed.'

The only issue presented by the. appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction.

The proof of the State showed that the defendants operated a barbecue stand-and dance hall in the negro -community known as Nobletown near Wewoka. Several officers testified to having visited the place of business of defendants at various times and having observed mixed crowds of colored and white people there drinking and carousing. Many arrests had been made at or near defendants’ place of business for drunkenness, fighting, assault with a dangerous weapon and attempted rape. Many other witnesses testified to having gone to the premises of the accused and there having purchased intoxicating liquor from one or the other of the defendants. Some of them testified- to buying whiskey in Seven Up bottles for $1.00 a bottle and others bought *397“Choctaw” beer. Fights in which knives were used were not uncommon and on one occasion, according to a witness, the defendant Gordon hit a teenage boy so hard with a pistol that it almost' severed his ear. Many white teenagers from Wewoka would attend the dances where the music was provided generally by a jukebox.

 The proof of the sale and open drinking of intoxicating liquor and a general course of disorderly conduct was wholly sufficient for the jury to determine that the two defendants were operating and maintaining a public nuisance in accordance with the definition of our statute, SO O.S.1951 § 2 King v. State, 71 Okl.Cr. 158, 109 P.2d 836; Hilbert v. State, 44 Okl.Cr. 89, 279 P. 910. Judgment and sentence of the County Court of Seminole County is affirmed.

BRETT and POWELL, JJ., concur.
----

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

of 27 April 2006

on the closure of the accounts of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the financial year 2004

(2006/821/EC)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

The President

Josep BORRELL FONTELLES

The Secretary-General

Julian PRIESTLEY

----

(1)OJ C 269, 28.10.2005, p. 29.

(2)OJ C 332, 28.12.2005, p. 60.

(3)OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(4)OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2051/2004 (OJ L 355, 1.12.2004, p. 1).

(5)OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1261/2005 (OJ L 201, 2.8.2005, p. 3).

----

RESOLUTION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

with comments forming an integral part of the decision on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the financial year 2004

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

----

(1)OJ C 269, 28.10.2005, p. 29.

(2)OJ C 332, 28.12.2005, p. 60.

(3)OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(4)OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2051/2004 (OJ L 355, 1.12.2004, p. 1).

(5)OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1261/2005 (OJ L 201, 2.8.2005, p. 3).

(6)OJ L 196, 27.7.2005, p. 68.

(7)OJ L 196, 27.7.2005, p. 69.

----
Table of Contents

Exhibit 13.1

CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B d e C.V. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                    |                           
|------------------- | --------------------------
|Date: June 30, 2009 | /s/ Carlos Salazar Lomelín
|                    |                           
|                    | Carlos Salazar Lomelín    
|                    | Chief Executive Officer   



|                    |                             
|------------------- | ----------------------------
|Date: June 30, 2009 | /s/ Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez
|                    |                             
|                    | Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez    
|                    | Chief Financial Officer     

Exh. 13.1 -1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Shareholder of
CITGO Petroleum Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-3226) on Form S-3 of CITGO Petroleum Corporation of our report dated March
11, 2004 with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of CITGO Petroleum
Corporation as of December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of
income and comprehensive income, shareholder's equity, and cash flows for the
year ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003,
annual report on Form 10-K of CITGO Petroleum Corporation.


                                                     KPMG LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
March 25, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of microHelix, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tyram
H. Pettit, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.




/s/ Tyram H. Pettit
-----------------------------------------------
Tyram H. Pettit
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
November 13, 2002
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.58

[LOGO]


January 27, 2000

Mr. P. Andrew Shaw
762 Pine Chase Court
Wellington, FL 33414

RE:   EMPLOYMENT

Dear Andy:

This letter will serve as acknowledgement that your employment, which is
presently on a month to month basis, shall be amended as follows:

1.   Your current salary, which is $125,008 shall be adjusted effective January
     27, 2000 to $150,000 per year.

2.   You will be entitled to the same benefits as you have been currently
     receiving (i.e. employee insurance, car allowance, etc).

3.   You will be entitled to a special termination pay-out which shall be equal
     to two times your last twelve months salary and benefits paid by the
     Company to you in the event your employment is terminated for the
     following:

     SPECIAL TERMINATION. In the event that (i) any entity or person not now an
     executive officer of the Company becomes either individually or as part of
     a group the beneficial owner of 40% or more of the Company's common stock;
     or (ii) the merger, consolidation, reorganization or liquidation of the
     Company (a "Change in Control"), the Executive, by written notice to the
     Company, may elect to deem the Executive's employment hereunder to have
     been terminated by the Company without cause, in which event the Executive
     shall receive lump sum compensation equal to 2.0 times his annual salary
     and incentive or bonus payments, if any, as shall have been paid to the
     Executive during the Company's most recent fiscal year.

     TERMINATION "WITHOUT CAUSE". In the event you are terminated without cause,
     you shall be entitled to a one-year severance agreement equal to your last
     twelve months salary and benefits paid by the Company to you.

4.   Your title shall be Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

5.   You will be entitled to a bonus in the amount of $20,000 in connection with
     the Company's year-end audit and the filing of the 10K. This amount is
     subject to sole discretion by the CEO and shall be based on successful and
     timely filing of the 10K, etc.

6.   This letter shall expire January 27, 2001.



<PAGE>   2

In the event that any change in the status of your employment is made (such as a
replacement chief financial officer) your salary and bonus terms may be amended
from time to time, however, the special termination provisions shall remain in
effect.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Joseph A. Paul
-------------------------------------
Joseph A. Paul
President & Chief Executive Officer