Proposed Rule: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Proposed New Listings of Substitutes; Changes of

Listing Status; and Reinterpretation of Unacceptability for Closed Cell Foam Products under the

Significant New Alternatives Policy Program; and Revision of Clean Air Act Section 608’s Venting

Prohibition fo r Propane

OMB Communication for Proposed SNAP Change of Status Rule

- 2

From: Newberg, Cindy

Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 10:30 AM

To: Whiteman, Chad <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Muellerleile, Caryn <Muellerleile.Caryn@epa.gov>; Schillo, Bruce <Schill o.Bruce@epa.gov>;

Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>; Owens, Nicole <Owens.Nicole@epa.gov>

Subject: Re: SNAP OMB Clearance

Chad, my sincere thanks given the holiday weekend.

Best

Cindy

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 28, 2016, at 10:19 AM, Whiteman, Chad < Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov > wrote:

OMB just concluded review in ROCIS.

From: Whiteman, Chad

Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 9:56 AM

To: 'Muellerleile, Caryn' < Muellerleile.Caryn@epa.gov >; Newberg, Cindy < Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov >

Cc: Schillo, Bruce < Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov >; Farquh arson, Chenise < Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov >;

Owens, Nicole < Owens.Nicole@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: SNAP OMB Clearance

Okay, I’ll have a look now. Are you folks ready for me to clear now?

From: Muellerleile, Caryn [ mailto:Muellerleile.Caryn@epa.gov ]

Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 9:37 AM

To: Whiteman, Chad < Chad_S _Whiteman@omb.eop.gov >; Newberg, Cindy < Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov >

Cc: Schillo, Bruce < Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov >; Farquharson, Chenise < Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov >;

Owens, Nicole < Owens.Nicole@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: SNAP OMB Clearance

Hi Chad,

the rule and support documents are now in ROCIS and ready for clearance through the database.

Thanks!Caryn Muellerleile

Regulatory Management Division

Office of Policy

US Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW (1803A)

Washington, DC 20460

(202) 564

- 2855

muellerleile.caryn@epa.gov

From: Newberg, Cindy

Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 7:04 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>; Farq uharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>;

Owens, Nicole <Owens.Nicole@epa.gov>; Muellerleile, Caryn <Muellerleile.Caryn@epa.gov>

Subject: RE: SNAP OMB Clearance

Me too. Safe travels.

Best

Cindy

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 6:57 PM

To: Newberg, Cindy < Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov >

Cc: Schillo, Bruce < Schill o.Bruce@epa.gov >; Farquharson, Chenise < Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov >;

Owens, Nicole < Owens.Nicole@epa.gov >; Muellerleile, Caryn < Muellerleile.Caryn@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: SNAP OMB Clearance

Hi Cindy, I’m glad we were able to wrap up the review today. Have a nice weekend everyone! Thanks,

Chad

From: Newberg, Cindy

Sent: Friday, Ma rch 25, 2016 6:56 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>; Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>;

Owens, Nicole <Owens.Nicole@epa.gov>; Muellerleile, Caryn <Muellerleile.Caryn@epa.gov>

Sub ject: RE: SNAP OMB Clearance

Thanks Chad!

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 6:53 PM

To: Newberg, Cindy < Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov >

Cc: Schillo, Bruce < Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov >; Farquharson, Chenise < Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov >;

Owens, Nicole < Owens.Nicole@epa.gov >; Muellerleile, Caryn < Muellerleile.Caryn@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: SNAP OMB ClearanceCindy,

The final, clean version of the preamble/rule that you shared in your mos t recent email (6:27pm) looks

good. OMB is sending this email to indicate that OMB has concluded review on the SNAP proposed rule

(2060

- AS80). OMB requests that EPA upload the final clean version of the rule to ROCIS at which time

OMB will finish t he fin al process steps on this end. EPA has indicated that it will upload this final version

to ROCIS over the weekend and that OMB will conclude review at the latest on Monday morning. As

part of the upload to ROCIS, it is requested that EPA upload the three ICF cost/benefit documents to

ROCIS in the “Supplementary Document” section of ROCIS.

Please let me know if you have any questions by calling my bb.

Thanks,

Chad

From: Newberg, Cindy

Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 6:27 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad < Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>; Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>

Subject: RE: SNAP Redline

Hi Chad

– Here’s the revised, clean version.

From: Newberg, Cindy

Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 6:16 PM

To: 'Whiteman, Chad' < Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov >

Cc: Schillo, Bruce < Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov >; Farquharson, Chenise < Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: SNAP Redline

Thanks Chad. We will make the changes and send it shortly

– and as we discussed, we will refer to a joint

letter rather than a consensus agreement.

From: Whiteman, Chad [mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 6:07 PM

To: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>

Cc: Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>; Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>

Subject: RE: SNAP Redline

Cindy, One final suggestion below. EPA references in the section of the comment section that NRDC

and AHRI did not provide any technical analysis or timeline for choosing 1/1/2015 so included a

comment specifically requesting technical comment. If this is acceptable, please send a final clean

version. I’ll give you a call in a second. Chad

“EPA requests comment and information on any potential environmental or other impacts of EPA

adopting a date other than January 1, 2024, which is our lead option

. and in In particular, EPA requests

comment on whether other alternatives that reduce overall risk would be available prior to January 1,2024 and for comment on any technical or other reasons that NRDC and AHRI proposed January 1, 2025

in their consensu s agreement .”

From: Whiteman, Chad [mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 5:38 PM

To: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>

Cc: Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>; Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>

Subjec t: RE: SNAP Redline and CLEAN

Taking a look now.

From: Farquharson, Chenise

Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 5:30 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>; Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>

Subject: RE: SNAP Redline and CLEAN

Hi Chad,

As we discussed, attached is the Summary memo with responses to the three additional interagency

comments we received yesterday. I’ve attached a clean and track changes version.

Thanks,

Chenise

____________________ _________________ Chenise Farquharson

Alternatives and Emissions Reduction Branch

OAR/OAP/SPD

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

WJC East 4355FF

(202) 564

- 7768

Farquharson.chenise@epa.gov

From: Newberg, Cindy

Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 5:15 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad < Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov >

Cc: Schillo, Bruce < Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov >; Farquharson, Chenise < Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: SNAP Redline and CLEAN

Chad

– here’s the clean copy.

From: Newberg, Cindy

Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 5:05 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>; Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>

Subject: SNAP RedlineHi Chad

–

Sorry this is so late. Attached is the redline and I will send the clean version shortly. Regarding the

tradeoff discussion, there’s revised language in the section that already discusses energy efficiency for

each of the chiller types. The other changes are where we discuss 2024 as what we are proposing but

seek comments on earlier and later dates.

I will send the clean ve rsion in a few minutes.

Best

Cindy

From: Whiteman, Chad [mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 4:01 PM

To: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>; Schillo, Bruce <Schillo .Bruce@epa.gov>

Subject: RE: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on draft EPA SNAP NPRM (2060

- AS80)

Importance: High

Hi Cindy, What time do you expect to passback ? Heard from DPC about the language changes. I need to

jump in a car and drive 8 hours so would be great to know when you might passback so I can figure out

how long I might need to stay in the office. Thanks, Chad

From: Whiteman, Chad [mailto:Chad_S_ Whiteman@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 9:47 AM

To: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>; Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>

Subject: RE: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on draft EPA SN AP NPRM (2060

- AS80)

That works for me. Let’s use this call

- in:

Bridge Number: (202) 395

- 6392

Conferee Passcode 775 0939

From: Newberg, Cindy [ mailto:Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov ]

Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 9:46 AM

To: Whiteman, Chad < Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov >

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise < Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov >; Schillo, Bruce < Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on draft EPA SNAP NPRM (2060

- AS80)

Chad

– I am in straight meetings at the moment. Would 11am work?

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 9:27 AM

To: Newberg, Cindy < Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov >

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise < Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov >; Schillo, Bruce < Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on draft EPA SNAP NPRM (2060

- AS80)Let me know what time works best for a call. Soo ner is better. Thanks, Chad

From: Newberg, Cindy

Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 10:09 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>; Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>

Subject: Re: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on draft EPA SNAP NPRM (2060

- AS80)



### Hi Chad

-

We are still working through the comments. We have a few concerns. I think we should plan to

speak in the morning. Thanks.

Best

Cindy

Sent from my iPhone

From: Newberg , Cindy

Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 8:22 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>; Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>

Subject: Re: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on draft EPA SNAP NPR M (2060

- AS80)



### Thanks Chad. We will take a look.

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 24, 2016, at 7:22 PM, Whiteman, Chad < Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov > wrote:

Cindy,

Here is the lastest passback with all of the comments from this round in the preamble

document. Comments can be identified by searching for 3/24 in the comment bubbles. Give me a call

this evening...anytime up to 10:30 if you would like to discuss. The Summary Comment Document has

t hree follow

- up comments that were included in the preamble, but I wanted to pass along the summary

comment document for context.

Chad

From: Whiteman, Chad

Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 3:04 PM

To: Newberg, Cindy < Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov >Cc: Farquharson, Chenise < Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on draft EPA SNAP NPRM (2060

- AS80)

Cindy,

Attached are the two follow

- u p, interagency comments that I mentioned on the call. I’ll provide the

remainder of the follow

- up a little later today.

Chad

From: Farquharson, Chenise

Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 10:55 AM

To: 'Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov' < Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>

Subject: Follow

- up to March 21 SNAP call

Hi Chad,

We appreciated the conversation we had with interagency commenters on Monday regarding our draft

proposed rule. Going forward, we e xpect that this important interaction will continue as appropriate.

It’s our desire to maintain a dialogue with key stakeholders and work closely with other federal

agencies, particularly NIOSH, after the rule is published to continue to share technical in formation,

ideas, and concerns.

On March 18, we received follow

- up comments from NIOSH concerning lower flammability limits (LFLs)

and our assumptions when considering the flammability of particular substitutes. During Monday’s

phone call, we agreed to p rovide links to some of our rules and risk screens that discuss our assessment

of flammability and LFLs. Below are links to two of our recent SNAP rules and relevant risk screens. The

risk screens provide information on how we evaluate flammability risks f rom hydrocarbon refrigerants,

and how we use the LFL concentration to set limits on refrigerant charge size in certain appliances.

Rule 19: Listing of additional hydrocarbon refrigerants in six refrigeration and air conditioning end

uses

Docket: https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2013

- 0748

Final rule: https://www.g po.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR

- 2015

- 04

- 10/pdf/2015

- 07895.pdf

Risk screen for propane in vending machines: https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA

HQ

- OAR

- 2013

- 0748

- 0008

Risk screen for ethane in very low temperature refrigeration:

https://www.regulations.gov /#!documentDetail;D=EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2013

- 0748

- 0004

Rule 17: Listing of hydrocarbon refrigerants for household refrigerators and freezers, and retail food

refrigeration

Docket: https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2009

- 0286

Final rule: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR

- 2011

- 12

- 20/pdf/2011

- 32175.pdf

Risk screen for propane in reta il food refrigeration:

https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2009

- 0286

- 0197

Risk screen for isobutane in household refrigerators and freezers:

https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2009

- 0286

- 0196Please let us know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Chenise

_____________________ ________________ Chenise Farquharson

Alternatives and Emissions Reduction Branch

OAR/OAP/SPD

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

WJC East 4355FF

(202) 564

- 7768

Farquharson.chenise@epa.gov

From: Newberg, Cindy

Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 10:21 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>

Subject: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on draft EPA SNAP NPRM (2060

- AS80)



### Chad

-

Attached are the responses to the interagency comments and summary document. As we

discussed, a few of these are still under discussion. I hope we can connect tomorrow and

resolve any outstanding issues.

Best

Cindy

From: Farquharson, Chenise

Sent: Wed nesday, March 23, 2016 4:58 PM

To: 'Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov' <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>; Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>

Subject: Benefits Analysis

--- SNAP NPRM Status Change Rule #2 (SAN 5873)

Chad

,

Attached is the benefits analysis for the draft SNAP proposed rule.

Chenise

_____________________________________ Chenise Farquharson

Alternatives and Emissions Reduction Branch

OAR/OAP/SPD

U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyWJC East 4355FF

(202) 564

- 7768

Farquharson.chenise@epa.gov

From: Whiteman, Chad [mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 1:37 PM

To: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>; Newberg, Ci ndy

<Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>

Cc: Sheppard, Margaret <Sheppard.Margaret@epa.gov>

Subject: RE: SNAP outreach materials

Thanks Chenise!

Cindy, Any word on when EPA will be sending over the passback?

From: Farquharson, Chenise

Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 1:35 PM

To: 'Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov' <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>; Sheppard, Margaret <Sheppard.Margaret@epa.gov>

Subject: SNAP outreach materials

Hi Chad,

During the meeting wi th OMB, SBA, and EPA on March 11, SBA requested materials related to three of

our recent SNAP stakeholder meetings. Attached are the presentations and meeting invitations for

those meetings.

1. SNAP workshop on fire suppression and explosion protection

— D ecember 2, 2015

2. SNAP workshop on heavy

- duty motor vehicle air conditioning systems

— November 18, 2015

3. SNAP stakeholder meeting

— September 11, 2015

Thanks,

Chenise

_____________________________________ Chenise Farquharson

Alternatives and Emissions Re duction Branch

OAR/OAP/SPD

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

WJC East 4355FF

(202) 564

- 7768

Farquharson.chenise@epa.gov

From: Whiteman, Chad [mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 10:52 AM

To: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>

Cc: Sheppard, Margaret <Sheppard.Margaret@epa.gov>; Farquharson, Chenise

<Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>

Subject: RE: Mtg to discuss SNAP comments @ 2:30 on Fri (3/18)Cindy,

At tached are the comments that I referenced in our discussion last night. The comments are labeled

3/23 and are highlighted in blue. Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Chad

From: Whiteman, Chad [mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 5:08 PM

To: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>

Subject: Re: following up

Okay, I'll give you a call at 6:30.

Sent using Blackberry

From : Newberg, Cindy [ mailto:Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov ]

Sent : Tuesday, March 22, 2016 05:04 PM Eastern Standard Time

To : Whiteman, Chad

Cc : Farquharson, Chenise < Farquharson.Chenise@epa. gov >

Subject : Re: following up

Absolutely. I will be in the office until 7. If that doesn't work, we can connect later this evening.

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 22, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Whiteman, Chad < Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov > wrote:

Okay, would there be time this evening after 6:30 that would work?

From: Newberg, Cindy [ mailto:Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov ]

Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 4:59 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad < Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov >

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise < Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov >

Subject: Re: following up

Chad

-

Given our discu ssion yesterday and your points on ensuring there's adequate time for a follow

- up, we

raised this with Janet already. I think it is better we connect today.

- Cindy

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 22, 2016, at 4:38 PM, Whiteman, Chad < Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov > wrote:Cindy, I’m also available any time tomorrow morning from 8am

- noon. Chad

From: Whiteman, Chad

Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 3:56 PM

To: Newberg, Cindy < Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov >

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise < Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: following up

I won’t be available at 5pm, but can do any time after 6:30pm.

From: Newberg, Cindy [ mailto:Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov ]

Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 3:46 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad < Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov >

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise < Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: following up

Chad

– I have a meeting at 4pm. Can we plan to speak at 5?

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:47 PM

To: Newberg, Cindy < Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov >

Subject: Re: following up

I'm in meetings until 3:45

- 4pm ish. Will call once I get out of t he meeting.

Sent using Blackberry

From: Newberg, Cindy

Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 1:18 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>

Subject: following up

Hi Chad

–

I left you a message and tried you again just now. We would like to follow up on the date for chillers, per

the discussion yesterday. Please give me a call when you have a moment so we can discuss the next

steps.

Best

Cindy

Cindy Newberg, Chief

Alter natives and Emissions Reduction Branch

SPD/OAP/OAR

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

+1 202

- 343

- 9729From: Whiteman, Chad

Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 2:00 PM

To: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa. gov>; Sheppard, Margaret

<Sheppard.Margaret@epa.gov>

Subject: RE: for today's call

Also, follow

- up on the aerospace narrow use exemption for chillers comment submitted on Friday.

From: Whiteman, Chad

Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 1:55 PM

To: 'Newberg, Cindy' < Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov >

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise < Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov >; Sheppard, Margaret

< Sheppard.Margaret@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: for today's call

Hi Cindy,

Primarily the LEL comments that we discussed on Friday to see what EPA recommends. One commenter

wants to discuss the chiller dates again.

Chad

From: Newberg, Cindy

Sent: M onday, March 21, 2016 11:57 AM

To: Whiteman, Chad <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>; Sheppard, Margaret

<Sheppard.Margaret@epa.gov>

Subject: for today's call

Chad

–

Could you provide a list of topics for today’s call on the SNAP rule so we can plan to have the correct

experts on the call? Thanks!

Best

Cindy

Cindy Newberg, Chief

Alternatives and Emissions Reduction Branch

SPD/OAP/OAR

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

+1 202

- 343

- 9729From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 4:58 PM

To: Hufford, Drusilla < Hufford.Drusilla@epa.gov >

Cc: Newberg, Cind y < Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov >; Sheppard, Margaret < Sheppard.Margaret@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: Schedule

As mentioned on the call, I received one follow

- up comment this a fternoon from a commenting

agency. Please see the last comment in this document with the heading “3/18 Comment” and

highlighted in blue.

From: Whiteman, Chad

Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 12:45 PM

To: 'Hufford, Drusilla' < Hufford.Drusilla@epa.gov >

Cc: 'Newberg, Cindy' < Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov >; 'Sheppard, Margaret' < Sheppard.Margaret@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: Schedule

Drusilla,

Attached are the follow

- up comments on the preamble. Look forward to discussing at 2:30. As the EO

meeting ends at 2:30 and often run over, I will join the call as soon as possible, but will make every

effort to get the EO meeting finished on time.

Thanks,

Chad

From: Whiteman, Chad

Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 10:19 AM

To: Hufford, Drusilla < Hufford.Drusilla@epa.gov >

Cc: Newberg, Cindy < Newberg.Cindy @epa.gov >; Sheppard, Margaret < Sheppard.Margaret@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: Schedule

Drussilla,

Okay, thanks. Let’s use this call

- In number: (202) 395

- 6392 and passcode 775 0939.

I provided some comments l ast night in the Summary Comment document. Here are a few of the other

topics that we will want to discuss: chillers compliance date and the RFA analysis. I am working through

the preamble and will forward something to you prior to the meeting that will highlight any additional

topics that we would like to discussion.

Regards,

Chad

Chad Whiteman

Policy Analyst │ Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs

Office of Management and Budget │ Executive Office of the President

202.395.4718 │ cwhiteman@omb.eop.govFrom: Hufford, Drusilla [ mailto:Hufford.Drusilla@epa.gov ]

Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 10:13 AM

To: Whiteman, Chad < Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov >

Cc: Newberg, Cindy < Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov >; Sheppard, Margaret < Sheppard.Margaret@ep a.gov >

Subject: Schedule

Chad

– we can be available for 2:30 but would need a call

- in line. Also, is there a list of topics to be

covered? It would help in addition if you could share any outstanding preamble comments, as we

understand these may exist a s well, and we would be better prepared to be responsive if we saw them

in advance.

Thanks much,

Drusilla

Drusilla Hufford, Director

Stratospheric Protection Division, U.S. EPA

(202) 343

- 9101

From: Newberg, Cindy

Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 5:27 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Sheppard, Margaret <Sheppard.Margaret@epa.gov>; Farquharson, Chenise

<Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>; Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>; David Rostker

(David.Rostker@sba.gov) <David.Rostker@sba.gov>; Hufford, Drusilla <Hufford.Drusilla@epa.gov>

Subject: Re: Mtg to discuss SNAP comments @ 2:30 on Fri (3/18)?

Hi Chad

I am adding Drusilla to the chain as she will be on this call. We'll confirm availability shortly.

Best

- Cindy

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 17, 2016, at 11:20 PM, Whiteman, Chad < Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov > wrote:

Margaret,

Attached are a few follow

- up comments on the Summary Comment document that can be identified by

searching for “3/17 Interagency follow

- up comment” and the yellow highlighted text. I will try to get to

the preamble this evening to see if there are any additional items to discuss for tomorrow’s 2:30 call. I

have sent out emails to a number of agencies that the cal l will be Friday at 2:30 so please let me know

ASAP if we need to change the time.

Thanks,

ChadFrom: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 2:03 PM

To: Sheppard, Margaret <Sheppard.Margaret@epa.gov>

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>; Newberg, Cindy

<Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>; Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>; David Rostker

(David.Rostker@sba.gov) <David.Rostker@sba.gov>

Subject: M tg to discuss SNAP comments @ 2:30 on Fri (3/18)?

Margaret,

Would you folks be available tomorrow afternoon at 2:30pm, following the SNAP EO 12866 meeting, to

discuss EPA’s passbacks to interagency comments? I spoke to Chenise about a few topics after t oday’s

EO 12866 meeting and will try to provide some feedback prior to tomorrow’s meeting about any other

topics for discussion. My afternoon is pretty open at this point so feel free to suggest another time if

the 2:30 time slot does not work.

Thanks,

C had

Chad Whiteman

Policy Analyst │ Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs

Office of Management and Budget │ Executive Office of the President

202.395.4718 │ cwhiteman@omb.eop.gov

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:09 AM

To: Maranion, Bella < Maranion.Bella@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: contac t info

Bella, Here are the documents that Boeing provided to me prior to the call. Chad

> https://www.fire.tc.faa.gov/pdf/systems/Oct14Meeting/Madden

- 1014

- BTPupdate.pdf<

From: Maranion, Bella [ mailto:Maranion.Bella@epa.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:07 AM

To: Whiteman, Chad < Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov >

Subject: contact info

Bella A. Maranion

Alternatives and Emissions Reduction Branch

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air and Radiation

Office of Atmospheric Programs, Strat ospheric Protection Division

Phone: (202) 343

- 9749maranion.bella@epa.gov

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9:29 AM

To: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>

Subject: RE: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on draft EPA SNAP NPRM (2060

- AS80)

Thanks Cindy and team. We’ll have a look an d get back to you.

From: Newberg, Cindy

Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 3:44 AM

To: Chad Whiteman <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>

Subject: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on draft EPA SNAP NPRM (2060

- AS8 0)



### Hi Chad

Please find attached the remaining responses and a date correction (highlighted) to the

interagency comments.

I am out of the office the rest of the week but I will be checking email and we can organize a

call, if needed.

Best

- Cindy

Sent from my iPhone

From: Newberg, Cindy

Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 3:57 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>; Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>

Subject: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on draft EPA SNAP NPRM (2060

- AS80)

Hi Chad

–

Thanks for conversation earlier today. Here’s the TSD you requested with the comments on March

4th. Have a nice weekend!

Best

–

CindyFrom: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 3:45 PM

To: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>; Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>

Subject : RE: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on draft EPA SNAP NPRM (2060

- AS80)

Thanks Cindy! I distributed and asked for comment back on Monday (3/14).

From: Newberg, Cindy

Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 2:07 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.g ov>

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>; Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>

Subject: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on draft EPA SNAP NPRM (2060

- AS80)

Hi Chad

–

As discussed, attached are the bulk of the responses to the interagency comments. There are a few we

are still working on that we will send separately as discussed (or request a teleconference). Also, we are

still working through the comments from March 4 th

.

Best

Cindy

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 4:56 PM

To: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>

Cc: Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>; Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa. gov>;

Hufford, Drusilla <Hufford.Drusilla@epa.gov>

Subject: RE: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on draft EPA SNAP NPRM (2060

- AS80)

Hi Cindy,

Attached are the second round of comments on the preamble and in response to the cost analyses. You

can find these comments by searching for EO12866 in the comment bubbles. Will EPA also provide the

technical support document that is referenced in the preamble? Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Chad

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:25 AM

To: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>

Cc: Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>; Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>;

Maranion, Bella <Ma ranion.Bella@epa.gov>

Subject: Re: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on draft EPA SNAP NPRM (2060

- AS80)Cindy,

I would recommend passing back to us if you have responded to all of the comments from the first

round.

Chad

Sent using Blackberry

From : Newberg, Cindy [ mailto:Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov ]

Sent : Tuesday, March 01, 2016 05:56 AM Eastern Standard Time

To : Whiteman, Chad

Cc : Schillo, Bruce < Schillo.Bruce@epa. gov >; Farquharson, Chenise < Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov >;

Maranion, Bella < Maranion.Bella@epa.gov >

Subject : Re: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on draft EPA SNAP NPRM (2060

- AS80)

Hi Chad

We've been going through the interagency comments and will want to follow up on several. It would be

helpful to know the timing for receiving your comments. It would be eas iest to for us to work with all

the comments at once. Thanks!

Best

- Cindy

Sent from my iPhone

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 10:44 AM

To: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>

Cc: Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>; Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>;

Hufford, Drusilla <Hufford.Drusilla@epa.gov>

Subject: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on draft EPA SNAP NPRM (2060

- AS80)

Hi Cindy,

Attached is the first round of EO 12866 interagency comments on the EPA’s draft rule titled, “Protection

of Stratospheric Ozone: Proposed New Listings of Substitutes; Changes of Listing Status; and

Reinterpretation of Unacceptability for Closed Cell Foam Products under the Significant New

Alternatives Policy Program; and Revision of Clean Air Act Section 608’s Venting Prohibition for

Propane,” RIN 2060

- AS80. We will send the next round of comments next week.

Please let me know if you have any q uestions.

Thank you,

ChadFrom: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 4:36 PM

To: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>

Cc: Newberg, Cindy <N ewberg.Cindy@epa.gov>; Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>

Subject: RE: SBREFA and Economic Analyses

--- SNAP NPRM Status Change Rule #2 (SAN 5873)

Okay, thanks! Chad

From: Farquharson, Chenise

Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 4:23 PM

To: 'Chad_S_Wh iteman@omb.eop.gov' <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>; Schillo, Bruce <Schillo.Bruce@epa.gov>

Subject: SBREFA and Economic Analyses

--- SNAP NPRM Status Change Rule #2 (SAN 5873)

Hi Chad,

Cindy and I spoke about the documents you requested for the SNAP Status Change Rule #2. I’m sending

the four attached documents on her behalf.

1. Draft Economic Impact Screening Analysis for Regulatory Changes to the Listing Status of High

- GWP

Alternatives used in Refrigeration an d Air Conditioning, Foams, and Fire Suppression. February, 2016.

2. Preliminary Cost Analysis for Regulatory Changes to the Listing Status of High

- GWP Alternatives used

in Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, Foams, and Fire Suppression. February, 2016.

3. AHRI and NRDC letter to EPA regarding chillers. February, 2016.

4. AHAM letter to EPA regarding household refrigerators and room A/C. February, 2016.

Thanks,

Chenise

_____________________________________ Chenise Farquharson

Alternatives and Emissions Reduction Branch

OAR/OAP/SPD

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

WJC East 4355FF

(202) 564

- 7768

Farquharson.chenise@epa.gov

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto :Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 12:39 PM

To: Newberg, Cindy <Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov>

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise <Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov>

Subject: RE: SNAP rule submission

Hi Cindy,

Thanks for the email and follow

- up vo icemail.Did you folks receive the request for comment on the FAR Council rulemaking related to HFCs? Would

like to talk with you folks about this rule once you have had a chance to review.

Thanks,

Chad

From: Newberg, Cindy [ mailto:Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 8:01 AM

To: Whiteman, Chad < Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov >

Cc: Farquharson, Chenise < Farquharson.Chenise@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: SNAP rule submission

Hi Chad

Happy New Year!

We’re working on the next SNAP. It should be uploaded into ROCIS before the end of the month. The

proposal includes both some changes of status as well as some listings for new alternatives (i.e.,

acceptable with conditions of use, unacceptable). The RIN # is: 2060

- AS80. EPA did not submit a

rationale for non

- significance.

We would be happy to follow up with you about the proposal.

Best

Cindy

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 11:03 AM

To: Newberg, Cindy < Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov >

Subject: SNAP rule subm ission

Hi Cindy,

Do you know anything about the timing of the submission of the next SNAP rule? At the end of last

year, I was told that you folks might be submitting the rule to OMB soon. Will you also pass along the

RIN and any summary that may have be en submitted for the significance determination?

Happy New Year and Thanks,

Chad