alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 8 (Monday, January 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 2242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00408]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8585]

In the Matter of the Designation of Ansar al-Shari'a in Darnah; 
Also Known as Supporters of Islamic Law; Also Known as Ansar al-Sharia 
in Derna; Also Known as Ansar al-Sharia in Libya; Also Known as Ansar 
al-Sharia; Also Known as Ansar al-Sharia Brigade in Darnah; as a 
Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of 
Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the entity known as Ansar al-Shari'a in 
Darnah, also known as Supporters of Islamic Law, also known as Ansar 
al-Sharia in Derna, also known as Ansar al-Sharia in Libya, also known 
as Ansar al-Sharia, also known as Ansar al-Sharia Brigade in Darnah, 
committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism 
that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, 
foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

     Dated: December 31, 2013.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-00408 Filed 1-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 9, 2006



/s/ DAVID S. SMITHDavid S. Smith President and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is
not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. The foregoing certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
SERVED: JULY 14, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

REAGECON DIAGNOSTICS LTD. 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-1323 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013S0700292) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST -BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Don Foynes, Commercial Director 

Reagecon Diagnostics Ltd., Respondent 

Unit 21 to 23 Bay F. 

Shannon Free Zone 

County Clare 

Ireland 

TEL: +353(0)61 472622 

FAX: +353(0)61 472642 

ONE COPY 

Christopher R. Stevenson, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Federal Aviation Administration, Southern Region 

1701 Columbia Avenue 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

Hon. J .E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

DocketNo. FAA-2015-1323 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430. 

-2-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-50494

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAVID MUNIZ CERECERES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:16-CR-1442-12

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent David Muniz Cereceres has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Muniz Cereceres has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 27, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-50494 Document: 00514574846 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/27/2018
No. 17-50494

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-50494 Document: 00514574846 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/27/2018
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUZ ELENA CATALAN, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-70004 

Agency No. A070-962-154 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 17, 2020**

Before: TROTT, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Luz Elena Catalan, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her third motion to 

reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 19 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-70004 

discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 

964 (9th Cir. 2002). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in concluding that Catalan failed to 

establish a prima facie case for the relief she sought and that she failed to establish 

that she qualified for the exception to the filing deadline and numerical limitation 

for motions to reopen by introducing previously unavailable, material evidence. 8 

U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(A), (C)(ii); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi v. Holder, 

597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010); see also Catalan v. Holder, 535 F. App’x 562 

(9th Cir. 2013) (denying Catalan’s previous petition for review). For example, as 

the BIA noted, Catalan did not introduce evidence showing that her father’s death 

in 2007 or the result of the 2011 Guatemalan presidential election would lead to 

her facing persecution or torture, and the declaration she submitted in support of 

her motion to reopen does not reflect any threats made against her personally in 

2008.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 32: Section 1350 Certifications

I, Barbara A. Manzolillo, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify this
annual report on Form 10-K of Medical Information Technology, Inc. for the
period ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

January 31, 2005
(Date)

Barbara A. Manzolillo, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Signature)

I, A. Neil Pappalardo, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, certify this
annual report on Form 10-K of Medical Information Technology, Inc. for the
period ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

January 31, 2005
(Date)

A. Neil Pappalardo, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
(Signature)
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

No. 94-9459.

Eric DOSS, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

FOOD LION, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

March 26, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of Georgia. (No. CV 293-145), Anthony A. Alaimo,

District Judge.

Before EDMONDSON, DUBINA and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

BARKETT, Circuit Judge:

Appellant-Defendant Food Lion, Inc., appealed the district

court's denial of summary judgment in this diversity action brought

by Eric Doss. Doss instituted this common-law tort action against

Food Lion, Inc., alleging that Food Lion's delay in authorizing

treatment of his psychological and psychiatric injuries constituted

an intentional aggravation of his work-related injuries. At issue

in this case is whether Doss's claim is actionable as an

independent tort under Georgia law, or barred by the

exclusive-remedy provision of the Workers' Compensation Act. In

the initial appeal, we concluded that this question of Georgia law

was dispositive and noted that it was unanswered by the clear

controlling precedent of the Supreme Court of Georgia.

Accordingly, we certified the following question to the Supreme

Court of Georgia:

DOES GEORGIA LAW RECOGNIZE AN INDEPENDENT CAUSE OF ACTION

APART FROM ANY REMEDY AVAILABLE UNDER THE GEORGIA WORKERS'

COMPENSATION ACT WHERE AN EMPLOYER AND/OR INSURER HAS

INTENTIONALLY DELAYED AUTHORIZING MEDICAL TREATMENT TO WHICH

AN EMPLOYEE IS ENTITLED UNDER THE ACT AND WHERE SUCH DELAY HAS

EXACERBATED A WORK-RELATED PHYSICAL INJURY?
Doss v. Food Lion, Inc., 83 F.3d 378, 380 (11th Cir.1996).

The Georgia Supreme Court answered the question in the

negative. Doss v. Food Lion, Inc., 267 Ga. 312, 477 S.E.2d 577,

579 (1996). Based on this opinion we reverse the district court's

denial of Food Lion's motion for summary judgment and remand this

case for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the

Georgia Supreme Court.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 3.6

                           PRENTISS PROPERTIES TRUST

                             --------------------

                            ARTICLES SUPPLEMENTARY
                                    TO THE
                             AMENDED AND RESTATED
                             DECLARATION OF TRUST

                             --------------------


            Prentiss Properties Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust
(the "Trust"), hereby certifies to the State Department of Assessments and
Taxation of Maryland that:

            FIRST: Pursuant to authority contained in Section 3 of Article VI of
the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of the Trust, three million seven
hundred seventy three thousand five hundred eighty five (3,773,585) authorized
but unissued shares of the Trust's Series A Cumulative Convertible Redeemable
Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest have been duly reclassified by the Board
of Trustees of the Trust as authorized but unissued shares of the Trust's
preferred shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value per share (the
"Preferred Shares").

            SECOND: A description of the Preferred Shares is contained in the
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of the Trust filed with the State
Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on October 16, 1996.

            THIRD: The reclassification of authorized but unissued shares as set
forth in these Articles Supplementary does not increase the authorized capital
of the Trust or the aggregate par value thereof.
<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Trust has caused these Articles Supplementary
to be duly executed by its Senior Vice President and attested by its Secretary
this 20th day of March, 2001.

                                      PRENTISS PROPERTIES TRUST


                                      By:         /s/ MICHAEL A. ERNST
                                         --------------------------------------
                                      Name:       Michael A. Ernst
                                                  -----------------------------
                                      Title:      Senior Vice President and
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  -----------------------------

ATTEST:

By:         /s/ GREGORY S. IMHOFF
   -------------------------------------
Name:       Gregory S. Imhoff
     -----------------------------------
Title:      Secretary
      ----------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Paul Chung, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Geocom Resources Inc. (the Company) for the interim period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

Dated:  February 23, 2008





[cfo906002.gif]

Paul Chung

Chief Financial Officer and Director

(Principal Financial Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Geocom Resources Inc. and will be retained by Geocom Resources Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1617]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      AFFORDABLE HOME HEALTH CARE

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. STEVE CHABOT

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. CHABOT. Mr. Speaker, states across the Nation are reducing their 
health care costs by doing something that makes a lot of fiscal and 
common sense: they are making it easier for seniors to receive care 
where they most want to be--in their homes. Washington should take 
notice. Instead of making it more difficult for home health care 
providers to operate, the Federal Government should strive to make 
these services more accessible to all seniors. After all, home health 
care is clinically advanced, cost effective, and, most importantly, 
patient preferred.
  Take my home State of Ohio as an example. Under Governor John 
Kasich's leadership, Ohio has significantly increased seniors' access 
to home health care--and, according to analysis by Miami University's 
Scripps Gerontology Center, the State is saving half a billion dollars 
a year as a result.
  I think Governor Kasich put it best when he said, that he could not, 
``think of anything more important to a senior than to be able to stay 
in their home with assistance, rather than being put in a facility that 
they are not comfortable with.'' The Governor is right.
  Mr. Speaker, as is usually the case, States are leading the way with 
low-cost, high-quality home health care. They are forging ahead with 
policies that not only save money, but deliver a better quality of life 
for our seniors. Making at home health care more accessible for seniors 
is a win-win for my State, and Washington would be wise to follow.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Digital Solutions, Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
J. Delgado, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of
my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                 /S/ WILLIAM J. DELGADO
                                 ----------------------------
                                 William J. Delgado
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
November 22, 2004
P.1 

OAR Box 1865 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

30) IV-E-18 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 12/3/2008 9:15:27 AM Sheet 30 of 105 
P.2 

A-83-27 

IV-E-18 

CONTACT REPORT 

Date February 6, 1987 Originator David White 

CONTACT BY: TELEPHONE ffl MEETING • Other 

NAME, TITLE & ORGANIZATION 

Art Hall , Morgantown ETC, DOE 

ADDRESS & TELEPHONE NUMBER 

(304) 291-4185 

PURPOSE OR SUBJECT (Give project number if appropriate) 

FBC Cost Analyses 

SUMMARY 

1. METC has conducted two FBC cost studies 1n the past year: 1) by EG&G 

to evaluate the accuracy of two existing FBC algorithms relative to 

reported project costs based on published literature (limited to 

bubbling beds),and 2) by Stearns-Catalytic which compared bubbling and 

circulating FBC costs. 

2. The EG&G study of algorithm accuracy was Inconclusive due to lack of 

adequate costing data 1n the available literature for comparison to the 

model estimates (models were COSTEAM and INCEPT). He will send a copy 

of their report. 

3. The Stearns study (not yet released) concluded that at unit sizes 

> 100,000 lbs/hr, capital costs for bubbling and circulating beds are 

roughly equal. Below 50,000 lb/hr, bubbling beds are lower capital 

costs. However, due to higher combustion efficiency and limestone 

utilization, operating costs for circulating beds are expected to be 

lower. 

CO 

at 

ACTION 

Distribution:
EERE Information Center

Programs and Offices

Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version

Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machines Final Rule

Analysis Spreadsheets

This page presents analytical spreadsheets providing rulemaking findings and

interactive tools for the refrigerated beverage vending machines final rule.

Instructions on how to use the life-cycle cost and national impact analysis

spreadsheets can be found in the final rule technical support document.

Engineering Analysis (Excel 3.3 MB)

Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (Excel 5.6 MB)

National Impact Analysis (Excel 8.1 MB)

Contact Information

Charles Llenza

Project Manager

(202) 586-2192

Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov

Content Last Updated: 09/22/2009

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Refrigerated Beverag... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial...

1 of 1 9/23/2009 11:32 AM

EERE-2006-STD-0125 COMMENT 75
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
put this in later
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000910678
<NAME> PINNACLE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      10,789,675
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,654,170
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            82,696,136
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    142,288,205
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,038,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             252,340,149
<DEPOSITS>                                 212,287,657
<SHORT-TERM>                                   360,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,646,197
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,680,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,366,295
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             236,497,861
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             14,536,043
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            5,570,732
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            20,106,775
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           7,594,054
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,594,054
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       12,512,721
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  234,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  92
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              7,121,142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,150,546
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   5,058,992
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,058,992
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.59
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     9.1
<LOANS-NON>                                    102,185
<LOANS-PAST>                                   934,134
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               251,356
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                764,292
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,842,152
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  189,223
<RECOVERIES>                                   151,086
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,038,015
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           267,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,771,015


</TABLE>