alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.7


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No. 333-     ) of Urohealth Systems, Inc. for the registration of
4,339,685 shares of its Common Stock of our report dated August 8, 1996, except
Note K as to which the date is August 14, 1996, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Richard-Allan Medical Industries, Inc.
included in its Form 8-K/A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on September 26, 1996.


                                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                ------------------------------
                                                    Ernst & Young LLP
                    

Kalamazoo, Michigan
January 6, 1997
Exhibit 23.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 33-85896) and Forms S-8 (File No. 33-78592, File No. 333-69913, File No. 333-79445, File No. 333-37912, File No. 333-79503, File No. 333-62078 and File
No. 333-76488) of D&E Communications, Inc. of our report dated March 1, 2005, on our audits of the financial statements of Pilicka Telefonia Sp. z o.o. which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers Sp. z o.o.
|                                     
|Warsaw, Poland                       
|March 10, 2006
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 5:26 PM

To: Wayland, Robertj
Subject: RE: Times for (1) Legal Discussion and (2) RIA Briefing

Thanks Bob! I think we are set on meetings. If we get through all the legal issues on Monday’s call, we can go ahead and cancel Thursday’s (or reappropriate it for another topic).

It’s always good to work with you – I appreciate your willingness to work with us.

Regards, Cortney

From: Wayland, Robertj [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 5:16 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney
Subject: RE: Times for (1) Legal Discussion and (2) RIA Briefing

I think all of the requested meetings have been scheduled ... if I missed anything, please let me know. BTW, it was great to see you again yest erday, I always enjoy working with you because you make the whole process tolerable ... almost fun! 

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division
Mail Code D243-01 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Office: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

Email: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document - FOIA Exempt

*************************************From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 11:58 AM

To: Wayland, Robertj

Cc: Elman, Barry
Subject: Times for (1) Legal Discussion and (2) RIA Briefing

Hi Bob,

Here are times that work on our end for the legal issues: - Mon, 4/14: 2-3:30, 4:30-6 - Tue, 4/15: 10-11:30, 4:30-6 - Thu, 4/17: 11-noon

And for a briefing on the RIA: - Tue, 4/15: 4:30-6 (listed above) - Wed, 4/16: 10-11, 1-2, 2:30-3:30

Regards, Cortney
Exhibit 10(a)



 Exhibit 10(a) 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional
Information and to the use of our report dated April 8, 2011, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company, included in Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-177584) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related Prospectus of Flexible Premium Variable Annuity - U. 
 /s/Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des Moines, Iowa 

January 13, 2012
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6544

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENYATTE BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (3:01-cr-01109-MBS-1)

Submitted: November 21, 2019 Decided: November 25, 2019

Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Emily Deck Harrill, Assistant Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL 

PUBLIC DEFENDER, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Sherri A. Lydon, United 

States Attorney, William K. Witherspoon, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenyatte Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence 

reduction pursuant to § 404 of the First Step Act, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 

5222 (2018), which permits a district court to impose a reduced sentence on a defendant

convicted of a covered offense as if certain provisions of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, 

Pub. L. No. 111-2220, 124 Stat. 2372, 2372 (2012), were in effect at the time the defendant 

committed the covered offense. Section 404(b) of the First Step Act defines a covered 

offense as “a violation of a Federal criminal statute, the statutory penalties for which were 

modified by section 2 or 3 of the Fair Sentencing Act.” Brown was convicted of possessing 

with intent to distribute five grams or less of crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 

§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C) (2012). Because the Fair Sentencing Act did not modify the 

statutory penalties for that offense, Brown’s offense is not a covered offense and the district 

court correctly denied Brown’s motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to § 404 of the First 

Step Act. 

We therefore affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DEVONTE ALLEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-0846

[December 28, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Hon. Scott Suskauer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502021CF005727A. 

Devonte Allen, Pahokee, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, LEVINE and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23
  
   No. 2-33-14542
    
    Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc.
1989 Employee Stock Purchase PlanNo. 333-02847
    
    Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc.
Amended and Restated Directors Stock PlanNo. 333-120337
    
    Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc.
Amended and Restated Stock Incentive PlanNo. 333-24237
    
    Form S-3D Registration Statement for Cooper Industries,
Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase PlanNo. 333-101451
    
    Form S-3D Registration Statement for Cooper Industries,
Ltd. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase PlanNo. 333-51439
    
    Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc.
Directors Retainer Fee Stock PlanNo. 333-51441
    
    Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc.
Amended and Restated Management Annual Incentive PlanNo. 333-37580
    
    Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper (UK) Employee
Share Purchase Plan
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         |   |                                     |
|------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                         |   |                                     |   |
| Date: November 14,      2008 | By:    | /s/ Gary      Rasmussen   |   |
|                         |   | Name Gary      Rasmussen            |   |
|                         |   | Title Chief      Executive Officer  |   |
|                         |   |                                     |   |

----
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4866 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase the Federal 

medical assistance percentage for the District of Columbia under the 

Medicaid Program to 80 percent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 19, 2018 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase 

the Federal medical assistance percentage for the District of Columbia under the Medicaid Program to 80 

percent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia 

5 Medicaid Reimbursement Act of 2018’’. 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4866 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASING THE MEDICAID FEDERAL MEDICAL AS2 SISTANCE PERCENTAGE FOR THE DISTRICT 

3 OF COLUMBIA TO 80 PERCENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1905(b) of the Social Se5 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b)) is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘70 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘80 percent’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) shall apply to calendar quarters beginning 

9 on or after October 1, 2018. 

Æ 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL OP-OFA-104]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)

Filed December 22, 2023 10 a.m. EST Through December 29, 2023 10 a.m. EST

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

## Notice

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxapps.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-II/​public/​action/​eis/​search.*

*EIS No. 20240000, Draft, NRC, MD,*                     Site-Specific Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Supplement 7a, Second Renewal Regarding Subsequent License Renewal for North Anna Power Station Units 1 and 2,  Comment Period Ends: 02/20/2024, Contact: Tam Tran 301-415-3617.                

Dated: December 30, 2023.

Julie Smith, 

Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2024-00027 Filed 1-4-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 19, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-30441

Summary Calendar

 

BRENNAN’S INC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD J. BRENNAN, JR., DICKIE BRENNAN & COMPANY, INC., 

COUSINS RESTAURANTS, INC., AND SEVEN SIXTEEN IBERVILLE, 

L.L.C.

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Louisiana

(USDC No. 2:04-cv-2808)

_________________________________________________________

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*1
Reviewing the record de novo, we agree with the district court’s order and affirm

the judgment of dismissal for the following reasons:

1. The 1998 contractual agreement between the parties has been the locus of both 

the current and previous lawsuits. In the previous lawsuit, the jury did not grant 

the plaintiff’s request to cancel the contract, although it awarded $250,000 in 

trademark damages. Last year, this court rejected plaintiff’s attack upon the 

contract. Brennan’s Inc. v. Dickie Brennan & Co., 376 F.3d 356 (5th Cir. 2004). 

After the conclusion of the first lawsuit, the plaintiff sent the defendant a 

contract termination letter specifically implicating Louisiana Civil Code Article 

2024. As the district court said, there was no impediment to raising plaintiff’s 

alternative theory of termination under Article 2024 in the first suit. 

2. The plaintiff argues an Article 2024 termination represents the exercise of a 

contractual right rather than a cause of action. This distinction is without effect. 

“Res judicata prevents litigation of all grounds for, or defenses to, recovery that 

were previously available to the parties, regardless of whether they were asserted 

or determined in the prior proceeding.” Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 131, 99 

S. Ct. 2205, 2209 (1979). Having failed to raise its Article 2024 argument in the 

original suit on the 1998 contract, the plaintiff is unable to file a new suit for 

purposes of rehashing old battles.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of CarePayment Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q\A for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patricia J.
Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1.
            The report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





2.
            The information contained in the
      report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:  December
22, 2010





/s/ Patricia J. BrownPatricia
      J. BrownChief
      Financial Officer
2012 Executive Officer Compensation



 Exhibit 10.1 
 2012 Executive Officer Compensation 
 On January 20, 2012, the Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation (the “Company”) approved the following changes to 2012 base salaries for certain of its executive officers: 

 

					
	 Name and Title
	  	2012 Base Salary	 
	 Jeff Staszak
	  			
	 President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	430,000	  
	 Mike Burns
	  			
	 Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	270,000	  
	 Tom Truman
	  			
	 Vice President, Worldwide Sales
	  	$	240,000	  

 Compensation for Mr. Bill Numann, Senior Vice President, Server and Storage, and Telecommunications Products Group,
and Dr. Craig Teuscher, Senior Vice President, Notebook Products Group, remained unchanged from their 2011 base salaries.
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-10660 and 333-10662) pertaining to the Novoste
Corporation Stock Option Plan and the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan of
our report dated February 8, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Novoste Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                       /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP

February 15, 2000
Atlanta, Georgia

                                       54
**Certificate
      of Chief Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Atlas South Sea Pearl Ltd
      (the
“Company”) for the financial year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Simon
      Adams as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Report and
      result of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.




/s/
                  Simon AdamsSimon
                AdamsChief
                Financial Officer




July
      12,
      2007




This
      certificate accompanies this Report pursuant to section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2010346EN.01001101.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 October 2010 — Nuova Agricast Srl, Cofra Srl v European Commission

(Case C-67/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - State aid - Aid scheme for investment in the less-favoured regions of Italy - Commission decision declaring that scheme compatible with the common market - Actions for damages in respect of the losses allegedly suffered as a result of the adoption of that decision - Transitional measures between that scheme and the previous scheme - Temporal scope of application of the Commission’s decision not to object to the previous scheme - Principles of legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations and equal treatment)

2010/C 346/17

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Nuova Agricast Srl, Cofra Srl (represented by: A. Calabrese, avvocato)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and E. Righini, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment delivered by the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) on 2 December 2008 in Cases T-362/05 and T-363/05 Nuova Agricast v Commission by which the Court of First Instance rejected the claims for damages for the loss allegedly suffered by the appellants as a result of the adoption by the Commission of the Decision of 12 July 2000 declaring compatible with the common market an aid scheme for investment in the less-favoured regions of Italy (State aid No 715/1999 — Italy (SG 2000 D/105754)) and as a result of the Commission’s conduct during the procedure which preceded the adoption of that decision.

Nuova Agricast

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Nuova Agricast Srl and Cofra Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Nuova Agricast Srl and Cofra Srl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 18.4.2009.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements Nos. 333-03040, 333-67581,333-67581-01, 333-67581-02, 333-67581-03, 333-67581-04, 333-72979, 333-67579,333-109304, 333-109304-01, 333-109304-02, 333-109304-03, 333-109981 and333-117600 on Form S-3 (as amended) and Registration Statements Nos. 333-03042,333-03044, 333-27987, 333-95497, 333-103009, 333-109941, and 333-127382 on FormS-8 (as amended) of our reports dated March 1, 2006, relating to theconsolidated financial statements of UnionBanCal Corporation and subsidiariesand management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of UnionBanCalCorporation for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

San Francisco, California

March 1, 2006

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6223

KRISTOPHER S. KOLLYNS, a/k/a Johnnie W. Todd,

a/k/a John Wayne Todd, a/k/a Kris Sarayn

Kollyns,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GARY MAYNARD, in official and personal

capacities; PAULA WOODLEAF, in official and

personal capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (CA-01-4380-3)

Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: April 1, 2003

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kristopher S. Kollyns, Appellant Pro Se. Melvin Brice McKeown, Jr.,

SPRATT, MCKEOWN & MCCRAE, York, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kristopher S. Kollyns appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Kollyns v. Maynard,

No. CA-01-4380-3 (D.S.C. filed Jan. 21, 2003 & entered Jan. 22,

2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED