alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 9 (Friday, January 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 2220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00690]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Sunshine Act Notice; Notice of Public Meeting Agenda.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public Meeting: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

DATES: Tuesday, January 30, 10:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m. Eastern.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in person at the University of 
Maryland, Stamp Student Union, 3972 Campus Dr, College Park, MD 20742. 
It will also be live streamed on the U.S. Election Assistance 
Commission YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpN6i0g2rlF4ITWhwvBwwZw.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Muthig, Telephone: (202) 897-
9285, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#52393f27263a3b35123733317c353d24"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="afc4c2dadbc7c6c8efcacecc81c8c0d9">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose: In accordance with the Government in the Sunshine Act 
(Sunshine Act), Public Law 94-409, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552b), the U.S. 
Election Assistance Commission (EAC) will conduct an open meeting with 
the University of Maryland on topics related to the 2024 elections.
    Agenda: During the meeting, election officials and other key 
stakeholders will join the EAC's Commissioners for in-depth panel 
discussions ahead of the 2024 elections on topics such as confidence in 
elections, election security, serving all voters, challenges for new 
election officials, and communicating about elections.
    The full agenda will be posted in advance on the EAC website: 
https://www.eac.gov.
    Background: The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) charged the 
EAC to serve as a national clearinghouse and resource for the 
compilation of information and review of procedures with respect to the 
administration of federal elections. This meeting will provide 
information on emerging topics in elections to help inform stakeholders 
as well as the general public and members of the media.
    Status: This meeting will be open to the public.

Camden Kelliher,
Acting General Counsel, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-00690 Filed 1-10-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4810-71-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 4301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01159]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than February 6, 2024.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#35765a5858505b41461b544545595c5654415c5a5b4675565d5c1b5347571b5a4752"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7a391517171f140e09541b0a0a1613191b0e131514093a191213541c08185415081d">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Sue Ann McClaren, Denver, Colorado; to retain voting shares of 
Easton Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of 
Community Bank of Easton, both of Easton, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-01159 Filed 1-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

            COUNCIL REGULATION (EC, EURATOM) No 1995/2006

of 13 December 2006         

amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 279 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 183 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the Court of Auditors (2),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee (3),

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 is hereby amended as follows:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from the date of entry into application of the Commission Regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the Financial Regulation and at the latest from 1 May 2007.

However, point 80 and points 84 to 94 of Article 1 of this Regulation shall apply from 1 January 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2006.

For the Council

The President

E. TUOMIOJA            

----

(1)  Opinion delivered on 6 July 2006 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(2)OJ C 13, 18.1.2006, p. 1.

(3)OJ C 28, 3.2.2006, p. 83.

(4)OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(5)OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p. 1.

(6)OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

(7)OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 114. Directive as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2083/2005 (OJ L 333, 20.12.2005, p. 28).

(8)OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 82.

(9)OJ L 310, 9.11.2006, p. 1.

(10)OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 25.

----
### FI LED U.S. COURT O F APP EALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT A ugu st 5, 20 05 THO MAS K. KAH N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 05- 1065 1 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 04-00032 -CR- J-20-MMH UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Plaintiff-Appellee,
ve rs us MIC HAEL SHANE MCNAUGHT, D ef en da nt- A ppe llant.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ A ppe al f ro m the U nit ed

S ta te s D istri ct

Co urt f or the Mi ddl e D istri ct

of F lor ida

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (A ug us t 5, 200 5) Before BL ACK , H UL L and W IL SO N, Circuit Judges PE R CU RIA M: L oui s R . H ar din , appoi nte d c ouns el f or Mi ch ae l S ha ne Mc N au ght in thi s dir ec t c ri m ina l a

ppe al , ha s m ove d to w ith dr awf ro m f urthe r re pr es en ta tio n of

the ap pe llant and f

ile d abr ie f pur sua nt t o A nde rs v. Ca lif or nia , 386 U . S. 738 , 87 S
. Ct
.2

1396 , 18 L
. E d. 2d 4 93 ( 1967 ). O ur ind ep en de nt r ev ie w of

the e nti re r ec or d r ev ea ls tha t c ouns el ’ s a sse ssm en t of the r el at ive m er it of

the appe al is co rr ec t. B ec au se ind ep en de nt e xa m ina tio n of the e nti re r ec or d r ev ea ls n o a rg uable iss ue s of m er it,
co unse l’ s m oti on t o w ith dr awis GRA NTE D , a nd M cN au ght ’ s c onvi ct ion a nd sentence are AF FIR MED .
#### Felicio OSTUNI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant FOSTER; Officer Williams; Det. David Ollila; Det. David Lucero; Chief Gerald Whitman; Deputy Mayor Stephanie Foote; and Mayor Wellington Webb, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-1239.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 30, 2003.

Felicio Ostuni, Sterling, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

*523Ken Salazar, Attorney General, Denver, CO, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before EBEL, LUCERO and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Felicio Ostuni (“Plaintiff’) is currently incarcerated at the Sterling, Colorado, Correctional Facility. On March 13, 2002, he filed this pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged, *inter alia,*that members of the Denver Police Department and other city officials violated his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights during an investigation that resulted in his conviction and current incarceration.

In an Order and Judgment filed May 13, 2002, the district court dismissed Plaintiffs complaint and entered judgment in favor of all Defendants. To the extent that Plaintiff was attempting to use his § 1983 action to invalidate the criminal conviction for which he was currently incarcerated, the district court ruled that such a claim is barred by *Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). It dismissed that claim without prejudice. The district court also dismissed Plaintiffs harassment claim against Defendants Foster, Williams, Ollila and Lucero, finding that claim legally frivolous because of Plaintiffs failure to “state a claim that rises to the level of a constitutional deprivation.” (Slip Op. at 2.)

On June 5, 2002, the district court denied Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R.App. P. 24, finding that Plaintiffs arguments were frivolous and that his appeal was not taken in good faith. Plaintiff then filed an ifp motion with this Court.

After a full review of the record, we GRANT Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis and AFFIRM the dismissal of his complaint for substantially the reasons stated by the district court in its May 13, 2002, Order and Judgment.

*

 After examining appellant's brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4613-4614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01293]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS 
Initial Review Group; Microbiology and Infectious Diseases B 
Research Study Section Microbiology and

[[Page 4614]]

Infectious Diseases B Research Study Section.
    Date: February 14-15, 2024.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bahia Resort Hotel, 998 West Mission Bay Drive, Shell 
Room, San Diego, CA 92109.
    Contact Person: Mario Cerritelli, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, MSC 9823, 
Rockville, MD 20892, 240-669-5199, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b2d1d7c0c0dbc6d7dff2dfd3dbde9cdcdbda9cd5ddc4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d5b6b0a7a7bca1b0b895b8b4bcb9fbbbbcbdfbb2baa3">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 18, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-01293 Filed 1-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
LARRY LEGEL, CPA

Practice Concentrating in
Taxation and Securities

5100 N. Federal Highway, Suite 409
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33308

(954) 493-8900 Office
Fax to: (954) 493-8300
e-mail: LarryLegel@aol.com
LegelCPA@Bellsouth.net




ACCOUNTANT'S REVIEW REPORT




Shareholders
Bernard, Allan & Edwards, Inc.
Leesburg, Florida


I have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Bernard,
Allan & Edwards, Inc. as of and for the periods ending June 30, 2003
and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, and
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the six months ending
une 30, 2003 and 2002 in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  All information
included in these financial statements is the representation of
the management of Bernard, Allan & Edwards, Inc.

A review consists principally of inquiries of company personnel and
analytical procedures applied to financial data.  It is substantially
less in scope than an audit in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards, the objective of which is the expression of an
opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, I do not express such an opinion.

Based on my review, I am not aware of any material modifications
that should be made to the accompanying financial statements in
order for them to be in conformity with Accounting Principles
Generally Accepted in the United States.


Larry Legel, CPA


August 14, 2003
Ft Lauderdale, FL
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1484

To enforce the public debt limit and to protect the social security trust

funds and other Federal trust funds and accounts invested in public

debt obligations.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 18, 1995

Mr. NICKLES introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To enforce the public debt limit and to protect the social

security trust funds and other Federal trust funds and

accounts invested in public debt obligations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY OF PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT TO

4 FEDERAL TRUST FUNDS AND OTHER FED5 ERAL ACCOUNTS.

6 (a) PROTECTION OF FEDERAL FUNDS.—

7 (1) No officer or employee of the United States

8 shall—
2

S 1484 IS

1 (A) delay the deposit of any amount into

2 (or delay the credit of any amount to) any Fed3 eral fund or otherwise vary from the normal

4 terms, procedures, or timing for making such

5 deposits or credits, or

6 (B) refrain from the investment in public

7 debt obligations of amounts in any Federal

8 fund.

9 (2) No officer or employee of the United States

10 shall redeem prior to maturity amounts in any Fed11 eral fund which are invested in public debt obliga12 tions for any other purpose other than payment of

13 benefits or administrative expenses from such Fed14 eral fund.

15 (b) PUBLIC DEBT OBLIGATION.—For purposes of

16 this section, the term ‘‘public debt obligation’’ means any

17 obligation subject to the public debt limit established

18 under section 3101 of title 31, United States Code.

19 (c) FEDERAL FUND.—For purposes of this section,

20 the term ‘‘Federal fund’’ means any Federal trust fund

21 or Government account established pursuant to Federal

22 law to which the Secretary of the Treasury has issued or

23 is expressly authorized by law directly to issue obligations

24 under chapter 31 of title 31, United States Code, in re25 spect of public money, money otherwise required to be de-
3

S 1484 IS

1 posited in the Treasury, or amounts appropriated, includ2 ing (but not limited to) the following:

3 (1) The Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insur4 ance Trust Fund.

5 (2) The Federal Disability Insurance Trust

6 Fund.

7 (3) The Federal Hospital Insurance Trust

8 Fund.

9 (4) The Federal Supplementary Medical Insur10 ance Trust Fund.

11 (5) The Civil Service Retirement and Disability

12 Fund.

13 (6) The Government Securities Investment

14 Fund.

15 (7) The Department of Defense Military Retire16 ment Fund.

17 (8) The Unemployment Trust Fund.

18 (9) Each of the railroad retirement funds and

19 accounts.

20 (10) The Department of Defense Education

21 Benefits Fund and the Post-Vietnam Era Veterans

22 Education Fund.

23 (11) The Black Lung Disability Trust Fund.
4

S 1484 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

2 Subsections (j), (k), and (l) of section 8348 of title

3 5, United States Code, and subsections (g) and (h) of sec4 tion 8438 of such title are hereby repealed.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      /s/ Kevin McDonnell
  38
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09

- 15

- 00315

- CR

________________

BEULAH LEE JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

Jefferson C ounty, Texas

Trial Cause No. 14

- 20109

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 27, 2015 , the trial co urt sentenced Beulah Johnson on a conviction

for credit card abuse. Johnson filed a notice of appeal on August 5, 2015

. The

district clerk has provided the trial court’s certification to the Court of Appeals.

The trial court certified that this is a plea

- bargain case and the defendant has no

right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On August 12 , 20 15 , we notified the parties that we would dismiss the

appeal unless the appellant established grounds for continuing the appeal. Johnson2 filed a response but failed to establish that the trial court’s certification should be

amended. Because the record does not contain a certification that shows the

defendant has the right of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

25.2(d). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ CHARLES KREGER

Justice

Submitted on A ugust 28, 2015

Opinion Delivered August 31, 2015

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Exhibit 10.5







[HAWKER LOGO / ENERSYS S.A. LETTERHEAD]






 



 



 







	


April 13, 2005











 



Mr. Raymond R. Kubis



2135 Lincoln Lake



Coal City IL  60416







Dear Ray:






With reference to the Managing Directorship Agreement dated January 8, 2002, (as amended the "Directorship Agreement"), between you and EnerSys S.A. (formerly known as Hawker Belgium S.A., and referred to herein as the "Company"), pursuant to which you are currently serving as Managing Director of the Company, we confirm that effective as of April 1, 2005 your annual fixed gross emolument provided for in Subsection 2.1 of the Directorship Agreement has been increased to 306,000 EUR (payable in twelve monthly installments of 25,500 EUR each).  Subsection 2.1 of the Directorship Agreement is hereby amended to reflect such increase.






Except as expressly set forth herein, the Directorship Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.






	


EnerSys S.A.








	


By: 
	


/s/ Nadine de Smet

	


Nadine de Smet



Managing Director















 










Agreed to and accepted:











	


/s/ Raymond R. Kubis





	


Raymond R. Kubis
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 21 December 2005         

relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement against Flexsys NV, Bayer AG, Crompton Manufacturing Company Inc. (former Uniroyal Chemical Company Inc.), Crompton Europe Ltd, Chemtura Corporation (former Crompton Corporation), General Química SA, Repsol Química SA and Repsol YPF SA.

(Case No COMP/F/C.38.443 — Rubber chemicals)

(notified under document number (2005) 5592)

(only the English, German and Spanish texts are authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/902/EC)

1.   SUMMARY OF THE INFRINGEMENT

1.1.   Addressees

1.2.   The rubber chemicals sector

1.3.   Functioning of the cartel

1.4.   Procedure

1.5.   Liabilities

2.   FINES

2.1.   Basic Amount

2.1.1.   Gravity

2.1.2.   Differential treatment

2.1.3.   Sufficient deterrence

2.1.4.   Increase for duration

2.2.   Attenuating circumstances

2.3.   Application of the 2002 Leniency Notice

2.3.1.   Immunity

2.3.2.   Point 23 (b), first indent (reduction of 30-50 %)

2.3.3.   Point 23 (b), second indent (reduction of 20-30 %)

2.3.4.   Point 23 (b), third indent (reduction of up to 20 %)

2.3.5.   Final remark on the application of the leniency notice

3.   DECISION

A non-confidential version of the full text of the Decision can be found in the authentic languages of the case and in the Commission's working languages at the DG Competition website at http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/.

----