alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 12

                  SHEFFIELD STEEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                         (In thousands, except ratios)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       Years Ended April 30,
                                             -------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   1996            1997            1998          1999           2000
                                                  -------         -------         -------       -------        -------
<S>                                          <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>           <C>
Fixed charges, as defined:
    Interest on long-term debt                    $11,758         $11,769         $12,300       $14,599        $15,167
    Amortization of debt issue costs                  476             368             383           456            485
                                                  -------         -------         -------       -------        -------

          Total fixed charges                     $12,234         $12,137         $12,683       $15,055        $15,652
                                                  =======         =======         =======       =======        =======

Earnings, as defined:
    Income (loss) before income taxes
      and extraordinary item                      $(3,091)        $(3,509)        $ 1,302       $ 1,496        $   193

    Fixed charges (as shown above)                 12,234          12,137          12,683        15,055         15,652
                                                  -------         -------         -------       -------        -------

          Earnings available for fixed            $ 9,143         $ 8,628         $13,985       $16,551        $15,845
           charges                                =======         =======         =======       =======        =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges [a]                  -               -           1.10x         1.10x          1.01x
                                                  =======         =======         =======       =======        =======
 </TABLE>

[a] Ratio of earnings to fixed charges is defined as income before income taxes
and extraordinary item plus amortization of debt issuance cost and interest
expense divided by the sum of interest expense plus amortization of debt
issuance costs. Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by
approximately $3,091 in fiscal 1996 and $3,509 in fiscal 1997.
EXHIBIT 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
    OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-K
        Bret
    W. Johnsen
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Shareholder of
CITGO Petroleum Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-65454) on Form F-3 of PDVSA Finance Ltd. and Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. of
our report dated March 11, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet
of CITGO Petroleum Corporation as of December 31, 2003, and the related
consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholder's
equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2003, which report
appears in the December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of CITGO Petroleum
Corporation.


                                                     KPMG LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
March 25, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1564 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1564

 To amend the Small Reclamation Projects Act of 1956 to authorize the 
Secretary of the Interior to provide loan guarantees for water supply, 
    conservation, quality, and transmission projects, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 1996

   Mr. Craig introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Small Reclamation Projects Act of 1956 to authorize the 
Secretary of the Interior to provide loan guarantees for water supply, 
    conservation, quality, and transmission projects, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECLAMATION PROJECT LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM.

    The Small Reclamation Projects Act of 1956 (43 U.S.C. 422a et seq.) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(m)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision contained in this Act, 
the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to provide loan guarantees 
to the developers, including nongovernment entities, of water supply, 
water conservation, water quality, and water transmission projects. 
Guaranteed loans shall bear interest at the rate agreed upon by the 
borrower and lender. The amount of guaranteed loans shall be subject 
only to such limitations as to amounts as may be contained in 
appropriation Acts providing budget subsidy authority for such 
guarantees. As used in this section a guaranteed loan is one which is 
initially made, held, and serviced by a legally organized lending 
institution and which is guaranteed by the Secretary hereunder. All 
guarantees issued pursuant to this section shall constitute 
obligations, in accordance with the terms of such guarantees, of the 
United States Government and the full faith and credit of the United 
States is hereby pledged to the full performance of such obligations.
    ``(2) The maximum contingent liability outstanding at any time 
pursuant to guarantees issued under this section shall not exceed in 
the aggregate $500,000,000.''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
  Certification
    of Chief Executive Officer
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
    2002
    Form 10-K
    March 31, 2008Date

By  /s/Richard
    T. Hutton, Jr.         Richard
    T. Hutton, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer
    (principal executive officer)     Form 10-K
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1631]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    IN HONOR OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in honor of the City of 
Brooklyn, Ohio. Brooklyn Township was founded in 1818, became Brooklyn 
Village in 1927 and in 1950 the City of Brooklyn was established.
  The City of Brooklyn is home to many firsts in the U.S. In 1966, it 
became the first city to establish a seatbelt law. In 1999, it enacted 
the country's first law to prevent cell phone usage while driving. 
Brooklyn High School's auditorium hosted Elvis Presley's first concert 
in the northern U.S. on October 20, 1955. Brooklyn is also home to a 
Hugo Boss Plant and the world headquarters of American Greetings and 
the popular Memphis Kiddie Park.
  Today, the City of Brooklyn is home to approximately 11,000 residents 
who are led by Mayor Richard Balbier. Mayor Balbier who has been 
serving as mayor since 2009 had previously served as the president of 
the Brooklyn City Council. There are six members on the City Council: 
Colleen Coyne Gallagher, Anthony DeMarco, Tom Murphy, Ron Van Kirk, 
Kathleen Pucci and Kevin Tanski.
  Mr. Speaker and colleagues, please join me in honoring the City of 
Brooklyn and all of its residents.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Trimol Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.





/s/ Boris BirshteinBoris BirshteinChief Executive OfficerTRIMOL GROUP, INC.





April 3, 2011





[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Trimol Group Inc. and will be retained by Trimol Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, 

AUSTIN 

QROVER SELLERS .~ 

Atrwmar GENERAL 

Honorable ban Gauldln 

Criminal Blstriot AttOrnsy 

Criminal Courts Building 

Dallas Z, Texas 

Attentionr Er. An&lo Piranlo 

Dear Slrr 

g 8888on an 

y'a:llll+t or niore. 

n&i end eeinba are poria aeasona but fn'tha 

td aet~out khathei or 

shing eeaeoim aa, provided 

Arter a oaraful aonsidaratlo~ of tha above request we 

.have ooncluded that roar f bat question is snewered by Sections 

3 and 5 of Senate Bill; Ho. 93, Aots of the 49th Legislature, appearing as Artlola 927e in the April, 1945, Curnulatlve Fa::phlet 

of Vernon's Annotated Texas Statutes Service; Section 3 reading 

08 iollows: 
853 

Honorable Dean Ceuidin - page 2 

“SSO. 3. It shall be unlawful for any person 

in any one day to oatoh and retain, or to place on 

i devfke or oontalner for holding same while 

$ ii %ihing, any fish that is taken from the publio 

fresh waters OS this state in exoess of the following 

llmltsr large-mouth blaok bass, smsll-mouth blaok 

bass, spotted bass, 

singly or In the 6 

or any sob-speoles of the same, 

F 

OgatO, fiftWA (15) Of whloh 

not more than ten 10) shali be of greater length 

then eleven (11) lnohes; white bass, twenty-five (25) ; 

blue oatfish, ohannel oatfish and yellow oatfish 

single or in the aggregate, twenty-five (26) J orapple 

or white peroh, twenty-five (26).” (Emphasis added) 

It shall be noted that previous to the passage of 

Senate Bill No. 93, the law provided under Artiole 952f-1 of 

Vernon’s Annotated Penal Code for a maximum possession limit 

at any time in Dallas County; s&id provialon read, in part, 

as foliows: 

v* * *, it shall b,e unlawrul for any one person 

to have In his or her possession at any t%me more than 

thirty (30) bass, thirty (3C) orap le or white peroh, 

seventy (70) bream, or seventy (70 7 goggle eyed peroh, 

oaught or taken from the fresh water rivers, lakes, 

ponds or lagoons OS this state, * * S.n 

SeOtiOA 5 or Senate Bill No. 9?5 repealed the above 

quoted artioie and reads, in part, as follows: 

“sec. 6. All laws or parts of laws, local, 

pneral or speolal insofar as they provide a 

oiosaa season or p&ioa of time when it Is unlawful to take, or oatch fish or to 1168 artifioial 

lures, or Insofar as they provide a siae limit, 

possession limit or daily aatah limit or otherwise 

oonfli t with any provision of GX&t shall be 

and ari hereby repealed; * * *.* (Emphaiis ours) 

Thus it is seen that the above quoted aeatlon OS 

Senate Dill MO. 93 repeals all laws or parts of laws, local, 
854 

Honorable Dean Gauldin - page 3 

;ennyl or special, Insofar as they provide for a possess 

. Aoqordingly, the emwer to your first question is 

under the present law AO person Is limited in his possess 

of flab to any meximum number of dey*a oatoh. 

ion 

that 

iOA 

IA enswer to your 80002a question, owe direot your 

attention to the enolosed Opinion Ho. O-6541, paSSed by this 

department b%y 9, 1945, rhloh we tmst satIsfeotorilp answers 

your inquiry. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORIBY QENERAL OF TSXAS 

’ BD%:zd 

Enal. 

Asslst+t 

Bob D. &ddox
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                     [LETTERHEAD OF HUDDLESTON & CO., INC.]

                               LETTER OF CONSENT

   We hereby consent to the references to us under the headings "Principal
Properties" and "Oil and Gas Reserves" in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
PetroCorp Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                          Huddleston & Co., Inc.

                                          By: /s/     B. P. Huddleston
                                          _____________________________________
                                                  B.P. Huddleston, P.E.
                                                        Chairman

Houston, Texas
March 14, 2001
ABRAHAM W. MIGUEL

- LOPEZ

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3208

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Michael Jones , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Appe llant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyrone JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-4547.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 29, 2003.

Decided Feb. 10, 2003.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*669OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Tyrone Jackson appeals his convictions for armed bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a)(d) (2001), brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(l)(A)(iii) (2001), and aiding and abetting under 18 U.S.C. § 2 (2000), and his subsequent 144 month sentence. On appeal, Jackson asserts the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

In reviewing a sufficiency of the evidence claim on appeal, we must sustain the verdict if the record contains “substantial evidence, taking the view most favorable to the Government, to support it.” *Glasser v. United States,*315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942). Applying this standard, we give due regard to the fact finder’s prerogative to resolve questions of credibility. *United States v. Burgos,*94 F.3d 849, 862-63 (4th Cir.1996). With these principles in mind, we conclude the Government presented sufficient evidence for a reasonable trier of fact to find Jackson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the charges against him.

Accordingly, we affirm Jackson’s convictions and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Li-ion Motors Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stacey Fling, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Stacey FlingStacey FlingChief Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial Officer





June 14, 2011
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-45879, 333-13033, 333-13035, and 333-16901 of US Diagnostic Inc. on Forms
S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-05395 and 333-67959 of US Diagnostic
Inc. on Forms S-3 of our report dated March 26, 2002 (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to US
Diagnostic Inc.'s ability to continue as a going concern), appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of US Diagnostic Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2001.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Miami, Florida
April 15, 2002
Exhibit 4.22
 Asbestos Injuries CompensationFund LimitedACN 117 363 461James Hardie Industries NVAtrium, 8th Floor, Strawinskylaan 3077
    
    Suite 1, Level 71077ZX Amsterdam
    
    233 Castlereagh StreetThe Netherlands
    
    Sydney NSW 2000PO Box A962Attention: Russell Chenu
    
    Sydney South NSW 1235DX 11548, Sydney DowntownJames Hardie 117 Pty Limited
    
    Telephone: (02) 9277 6600Level 3, 22 Pitt Street
    
    Facsimile: (02) 9277 6699Sydney NSW 2000Attention: Bruce PottsThe State of New South Wales, c/- The Cabinet OfficeLevel 39, Governor Macquarie TowerFarrer PlaceSydney NSW 2000Attention: Leigh Sanderson
   Interest Rate  Amended and Restated Final Funding Agreement Clause 4.7




---



##### 



Yours faithfully,/s/ Peter W. BakerDirector/SecretaryDuly authorised for and on behalf of Asbestos Injuries Compensation Fund Limited
in its capacity as trustee of the Asbestos Injuries Compensation Fund/s/ Russell ChenuDirectorDuly authorised on behalf of James Hardie Industries N.V./s/ Bruce PottsDirectorDuly authorised for and on behalf of James Hardie 117 Pty Limited/s/ Leigh SandersonDuly authorised for and on behalf of the New South Wales Government6/8/07
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: August 6, 2010
/s/ DAVID S. SMITHDavid S. Smith

President and Treasurer

(Principal Executive Officer and

Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. The foregoing certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
             /s/ Mike L. WilhelmsMike L. WilhelmsSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Daniel S. Goldberger certify that:     1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Xcorporeal, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant is made known to us by others within the entity, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  April 16, 2007 /s/ DANIEL S. GOLDBERGER   Daniel S. Goldberger   President and Chief Operating Officer