alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JORGE LUIS RESENDIZ-MEJIA, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-72561 

Agency No. A077-228-035 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Immigration Judge

Submitted December 11, 2019**

Before: WALLACE, CANBY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Jorge Luis Resendiz-Mejia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.31(a) 

that he did not have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture in Mexico and thus 

is not entitled to relief from his reinstated removal order. We have jurisdiction 

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the IJ’s factual 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 18 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-72561 

findings. Andrade-Garcia v. Lynch, 828 F.3d 829, 836 (9th Cir. 2016). We review 

de novo claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings. Cruz 

Rendon v. Holder, 603 F.3d 1104, 1109 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for 

review.

Resendiz-Mejia does not challenge the agency’s determination that he failed 

to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of persecution on account of a protected 

ground. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) 

(issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Resendiz-Mejia 

failed to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of torture by or with the consent or 

acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. See Andrade-Garcia, 828 

F.3d at 836-37.

We reject as unsupported by the record Resendiz-Mejia’s contentions that 

the IJ abused his discretion or violated Resendiz-Mejia’s due process rights by 

“disallowing” testimony during his reasonable fear hearing. See Lata v. INS, 204 

F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error to prevail on a due process claim). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of AirNet Systems,
Inc. of our report dated February 8, 2001 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of AirNet Systems, Inc.
included herein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-08189 and No. 333-62659) pertaining to the AirNet Systems,
Inc. Amended and Restated 1996 Incentive Stock Plan and the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-43605) pertaining to the AirNet Systems, Inc.
Retirement Savings Plan of our report dated February 8, 2001, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of AirNet
Systems, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of AirNet Systems, Inc.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Columbus, Ohio
March 26, 2001















                                      1
##### 



APRIA HEALTHCARE SIGNS DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT  TO ACQUIRE CORAM, INC.
 
    
    Acquisition significantly expands Aprias national infusion footprint and adds
broad network of ambulatory infusion suites to Aprias existing service offering
    
    Adds strength in fast-growing specialty pharmacy services segment
    
    Expands managed care service capabilities; diversifies payor and product mix
    
    Creates the premier specialty infusion services provider
   1




---



##### 



® ®
 2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



4
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KIM DAVID MARCH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 128 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Published Opinion and Order of 

the Superior Court at No. 530 MDA 

2016, at 154 A.3d 803 (Pa. Super. 

2017) entered on January 26, 2017, 

reversing and remanding the Order 

Entered of the Berks County Court of 

Common Pleas at No. CP-06-CR0005650-2015 entered on March 3, 

2016

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 3rd day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The Superior Court’s order is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED 

to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of this Court’s decision in 

Commonwealth v. Myers, __ A.3d __, 7 EAP 2016, 2017 WL 3045867 (Pa. July 19, 

2017) and the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Birchfield v. North Dakota, __ 

U.S. __, 136 S.Ct. 2160 (2016). 

DECIDED: OCTOBER 3, 2017
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1764

GLENDORA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DENNIS JACOBS; JOHN M. WALKER, JR.; ROSEANN B.

MACKECHNE; BERNARD F. MADSEN, JR.; RALPH

GARGULIO, Physician’s Assistant; SUBHASH

KULKARNI; HUDSON VALLEY EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN;

LEROY PHILLIPS; ASHOK SHAH; ASGHAR ANWAR;

HUDSON VALLEY CRITICAL CARE PHYSICIANS, PC;

DIANE KANTAROS; JAMES SCADUTO; DANIEL CAPURRI;

DANIEL M. PHILBIN; LAWRENCE S. SCHEK; KHURRZM

I. ASHRAF; TACONIC CARDIOTHORACIC SURGEONS;

PETER ZAKOW; HUDSON VALLEY UROLOGY; HUDSON

VALLEY RADIOLOGY PC; BRYAN YEN; DONALD LIEN;

MARK R. BRADY; BENJAMIN SECKLER; PHILIP

AMATULLE; HENRY J. FISCHER, JR.; JOSEPH

ANTONIO; JACK I. HENTZEL; GOLDSTEIN W. ZEV;

VASSAR BROTHERS MEDICAL CENTER; NCO FINANCIAL

SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, f/k/a The Revenue

Maximization Group, Incorporated; DANIEL P.

SICCONE; PAUL LAPLANTE; REGGIE ANDERSON;

DIANNE BENNETT; CHARLES F. DOLAN; JAMES L.

DOLAN; MACK BUDILL; THOMAS GARGER; CHARLES A.

FORMZ; CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION; ROBERT

CALLAWAY; SATTERLEE, STEPHENS, BURKE & BURKE;

DEZNELL REECE TACHZ; PAUL J. KELLY, JR.;

JUDICIAL COUNCIL; HARRIS I. HARTZ; PATRICK

FISCHER; AUDREY WEIGEL; HUG; O’SCANLAIN;

TASHIMA; CATHY CATTERSON; JEFF CROCKER; ROBERT

W. DOYLE; ROBERT A. LIFSON; KENNETH W.

RUDOLPH; NANCY SUNSHINE; WILLIAM W. WILKINS;

BOYCE F. MARTIN; LAURI BZTTANANI; JAMES O.

ROBBINS; COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED;

CAROL B. AMON; J. L. EDMONDSON; ROBERT E.

GERBER; SHELLEY C. CHAPMAN; KAREN MURPHY,
2

Defendants - Appellees.
3

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-03-

1166-MJG)

Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 20, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glendora, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
4

PER CURIAM:

Glendora appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

her civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Glendora v. Jacobs, No. CA-03-1166-MJG

(D. Md. Apr. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; PAR-22-069 High Impact, Interdisciplinary Science in NIDDK Research Areas (RC2 Clinical Trial Optional).                    

*Date:*                         February 22, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Tori Stone, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 7017, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 827-0994,                         *tori.stone@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 12, 2024. 

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-00949 Filed 1-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8420

JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SENECA TOWN AND INSURANCE COMPANY; 1000 DEFENDANTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (2:08-cv-03417-HMH-RSC)

Submitted: January 28, 2010 Decided: February 26, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Julian Edward Rochester appeals the district court’s 

order dismissing this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for declaratory judgment 

and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Rochester v. Seneca Town & Ins. Co., No. 2:08-cv-03417-HMH-RSC 

(D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 20

- 00075

- CV

UPSHUR COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT , Appellant

V.
MUSTANG GAS COMPRESSION, LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 115th District Court Upshur County, Texas Trial C ourt No. 475

- 17

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss2 

### ME MORANDUM OPINION

On February 8 , 20 21 , the parties f iled a motion to abate this appeal pursuant to Rule
42.1(a)(2)(C) of the Texas Rules of App ellate Procedure for purposes of effectuating their
settlement agreement. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2)(C). By order dated February 22, 2021, we
granted that motion and abated the matter with instructions to the parties that, if and when they

effectuate d their settlement agreement, they were to file a motion to reinstate and dismiss this
appeal. The parties have filed a motion to reinstate and dismiss the appeal, informing this Court that their settlement has been effectuated. We grant the parties’ mot ion, reinstate the appeal, and

dismiss it.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal

.

Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice

D ate Submitted: April 6, 2021 Date Decid ed: April 7, 2021
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 2482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00573]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2023-2051; Airspace Docket No. 23-ASO-38]
RIN 2120-AA66


Amendment of Class E Airspace; Statesboro, GA; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting a final rule published in the Federal 
Register on December 27, 2023. The final rule amended Class E airspace 
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface for Statesboro-Bulloch 
County Airport, Statesboro, GA. This action corrects an error in the 
Class E legal description.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, March 21, 2024. The Director of the Federal 
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 1 CFR 
part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11 and 
publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order JO 7400.11H Airspace Designations and Reporting 
Points and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, contact the Rules 
and Regulations Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; 
telephone: (202) 267-8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701 
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; Telephone: (404) 305-6364.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    The FAA published a final rule in the Federal Register on December 
27, 2023 (88 FR 89292), for Docket No. FAA 2023-2051, amending Class E 
airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface for 
Statesboro-Bulloch County Airport, Statesboro, GA. After publication, 
the FAA found the Class E description listed the airport name 
incorrectly. This action corrects this error.

Correction to the Final Rule

    In FR Doc 2023-28312 at 89293, published in the Federal Register on 
December 27, 2023, The FAA makes the following correction:

0
1. On page 89293, in the second column, correct the ASO GA E5 
description for Statesboro, GA, to read as follows:

ASO GA E5 Statesboro, GA [Corrected]

Statesboro-Bulloch County Airport, GA
    (Lat. 32[deg]28'58'' N, long 81[deg]44'13'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface 
within a 7.2-mile radius of Statesboro-Bulloch County Airport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on January 9, 2024
Andreese C. Davis,
Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team South, Eastern Service Center, Air 
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2024-00573 Filed 1-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 14
- 00157
- CV

M. M., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 340TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TOM GRE EN COUNTY, NO. C
- 12
- 0085
- CPS, HON O RABLE JAY K. WEATHER B Y , JUDGE PRESIDING
O R D E R PER CURIAM

The reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due to be filed on
March 27, 2014

. By request to this Court dated March 27, 2014 , Cindy Rister

- Saunders requested an extension of ten days.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure prohibit this Court from granting extensions of over 10 days for the filing of reporters’ records in accelerated appeals, including those from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Further, any
extens ions of time granted for the filing of the reporters’ records may not exceed 30 days cumulatively. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(2). Accordingly, Cindy Rister

- Saunders is hereby ordered to file the reporter’s record in this case on or before April 7, 2014

. If the record is not filed by that date, Cindy Rister

- Saunders may be required to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on April 1, 2014

.Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin and Field
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-0618

_____________________________

RIGOBERTO RAMOS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal—Original Jurisdiction.

August 16, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Rigoberto Ramos, pro se, Petitioner.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1624

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 5, 1996

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To reauthorize the Hate Crime Statistics Act, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION.

4 The first section of the Hate Crime Statistics Act (28

5 U.S.C. 534 note) is amended—

6 (1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘for the cal7 endar year 1990 and each of the succeeding 4 cal8 endar years’’ and inserting ‘‘for each calendar year’’;

9 and
2

•S 1624 RFH

1 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘through fiscal

2 year 1994’’.

Passed the Senate May 21, 1996.

Attest: KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

Secretary.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2013-0419

 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-129-AD

RD 8/4-32-0190, I1 --- 4/2/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0166

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JONATHAN LOUIS KESSLER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 9, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 2 2024

07/02/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0166
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
These numbers pertain 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      909
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            60,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         61,773
<PP&E>                                1,242,864
<DEPRECIATION>                           44,955
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        1,259,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    20,781
<BONDS>                                 474,609
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                              764,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          1,259,682
<SALES>                                 157,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        160,570
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            78,796
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         (4,271)<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       18,111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          67,934
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      67,934
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                             67,934
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              2.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                              2.31
<FN>
Included in other expenses are minority interest expense, gain on exchange of self-storage facilities and interest income.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 09, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 09, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17I0163. COVERED WAGON TRAILERS, LLC et al. v. KIM W. SHEFFIELD.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2014S06