alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement



 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED 

Exhibit 10.9.2 
 AMENDMENT #1 
 TO 

AMENDED AND RESTATED MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment (“Amendment”) effective October 1, 2010 (“Amendment Effective Date”) is between Synacor, Inc. (“Synacor”) and Charter Communications Operating,
LLC (“Client”) under which the parties hereto mutually agree to modify and amend the Synacor Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement, dated April 1, 2010 (including the exhibits, schedules and amendments thereto, the
“Agreement”). All capitalized terms used herein, which are defined in the Agreement and not otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. 
 Whereas, the parties desire to modify the amount due related to video advertising, 
 Now
therefore, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 

 

	1.0	Banner Video: The following will be added at the end of the third bullet point under Section 4(b)(ii)(a) of Schedule A of the Agreement to address banner
video ads: 

  

	 	•	 	 Notwithstanding the foregoing, during the Initial Term, Client will pay Synacor [*] 



 

	2.0	Scope of Amendment: This Amendment supersedes all proposals, oral or written, all negotiations, conversations, or discussions between or among parties relating
to the subject matter of this Amendment and all past dealing or industry custom. This Amendment shall be integrated in and form part of the Agreement upon execution. All terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged except as
expressly modified in this Amendment; and the terms of the Agreement, as modified by this Amendment, are hereby ratified and confirmed. Where the terms of the Agreement conflict with those of this Amendment, however, the terms of this Amendment
shall control. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date. 

 

									
	SYNACOR, INC.	 		 	CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING, LLC
		 		 	By:	 	 Charter Communications, Inc.,

its Manager

					
	By:	 	 /s/ Sheldon M. Schenkler
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Christopher A. Hill

					
	Name:	 	 Sheldon M. Schenkler
	 		 	Name:	 	 Christopher A. Hill

					
	Title:	 	 Corporate Controller
	 		 	Title:	 	 VP Business Development


 [*] = CERTAIN INFORMATION HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN
REQUESTED WITH RESPECT TO THE OMITTED PORTIONS.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,562,227
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  461,374
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,942
<INVENTORY>                                  1,150,590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,738,704
<PP&E>                                         301,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,276,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,478,370
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           422
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,797,786
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,276,578
<SALES>                                        692,256
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               740,951
<CGS>                                          495,272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,789,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               500,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,053,661)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,053,661)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.83)
        

</TABLE>
800 17th Street, NW, Suite 1100 | Washington, DC 20006 | T 202.955.3000 | F 202.955.5564 

Holland & Knight LLP | www.hklaw.com 

Gary L. Halbert 

202.469.5150 

gary.halbert@hklaw.com 

Charles D. Tobin 

202.419.2539 

charles.tobin@hklaw.com 

Jennifer M. Nowak 

202.419.2451 

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com 

Anchorage | Atlanta | Austin | Boston | Chicago | Dallas | Denver | Fort Lauderdale | Jacksonville | Lakeland | Los Angeles | Miami 

New York | Northern Virginia | Orlando | Portland | San Francisco | Tallahassee | Tampa | Washington, D.C. | West Palm Beach 

October 14, 2015 

Via www.regulations.com 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: The E.W. Scripps Company Petition for Summary Grant of Exemption Pursuant to 

14 C.F.R. Part 11 and Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 

2012 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

The E.W. Scripps Company (hereinafter “Scripps”), hereby applies for an exemption from 

certain Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs), listed below, to allow for the operation of small 

unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) to conduct commercial flights for aerial photography and filming 

under the conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA.1 As set forth below, 

the operations for which this exemption is sought would be carried out in accordance with the 

conditions the FAA has placed on holders of similar exemptions. As such, we request summary 

approval of this petition for exemption pursuant to FAA’s summary grant policy, announced on 

April 9, 2015.2 

Scripps, one of the nation’s largest independent TV station owners, with 33 television 

stations in 24 markets and a reach of nearly one in five U.S. households, would operate the UAS 

to capture aerial footage from lower altitudes than possible from traditional helicopter aerial 

footage, supplementing coverage of a wide variety of news events. The operation of UAS will 

allow Scripps to provide news coverage that cannot be collected by helicopter in a cost-effective 

and/or safe manner. Additionally, for Scripps stations that do not currently have helicopter 

operations, the use of UAS will allow for local aerial coverage that previously was unavailable, 

 

1 See Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Reform Act), P.L. 112-95 (2012); see 

also 14 C.F.R. Part 11. 

2 See FAA Press Release, http://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=82485.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solelyfor the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned ChiefExecutive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as amended (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ Ricardo A. Salas                                     |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Ricardo A. Salas,  President and Chief Executive Officer |
| March 16, 2006                                           |

 

----
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Melissa Leigh Browder

, * From the 142nd District

Court of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR39127.

Vs. No. 11

- 14

- 00023

- CR * October 9, 2014

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has considered Melissa Leigh Browder’s motion for nonsuit and

dismiss al of her appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in

accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1780/2006

of 1 December 2006         

fixing the minimum selling price for butter for the 53nd individual invitation to tender issued under the standing invitation to tender referred to in Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10(c) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 53nd individual invitation to tender pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999, in respect of which the time limit for the submission of tenders expired on 28 November 2006, the minimum selling price for butter is fixed at 236,21 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 2 December 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 December 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

(2)OJ L 333, 24.12.1999, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1802/2005 (OJ L 290, 4.11.2005, p. 3).

----
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-1924

___________

National Labor Relations Board, *

*

Petitioner, *

*

v. *

*

McGuire Plumbing and Heating, Inc., *

*

Respondent. *

__________ On Petition for Review from

National Labor Relations Board.

No. 04-2114

__________ [UNPUBLISHED]

National Labor Relations Board, *

*

Respondent, *

*

v. *

*

McGuire Plumbing and Heating, Inc., *

*

Petitioner. *

___________

Submitted: January 10, 2005

Filed: January 19, 2005

___________
-2-

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

An administrative law judge (ALJ) found McGuire Plumbing & Heating, Inc.

unlawfully refused to hire two union members, Dale Hankins and Robert Vance.

McGuire was ordered to take affirmative action to make Hankins and Vance whole

for any loss of earnings. McGuire Plumbing did not file any exceptions with the

Board, the Board summarily adopted the ALJ’s decision, and we summarily entered

a judgment enforcing the Board’s order. A dispute about the amount of backpay

arose. After a hearing, an administrative law judge (ALJ) determined the applicable

back pay period, the hours Hankins and Vance would have worked, and their wage

rates. The Board affirmed the ALJ’s decision. McGuire now petitions for review

and the NLRB seeks enforcement. 

McGuire raises eight arguments challenging the back pay orders. McGuire’s

arguments are not properly before us. McGuire Plumbing’s claim that the company

would not have hired Vance was resolved against the company in the underlying

unfair labor practice proceeding and cannot be relitigated in this compliance

proceeding. NLRB v. Laredo Packing Co., 730 F.2d 405, 407 (8th Cir. 1984).

McGuire Plumbing did not raise most of its remaining arguments in exceptions before

the Board and offers no extraordinary reasons for failing to do so. Thus, we lack

jurisdiction to consider them. Cobb Mech. Contractors, Inc. v. NLRB, 295 F.3d

1370, 1377 (D.C. Cir. 2002). McGuire Plumbing raised one issue in exceptions to

the Board that was not decided in the underlying unfair labor practice proceeding:

that backpay was excessive because the backpay period failed to account for the

company’s typical employment cycle and normal pattern of employee hires,

discharges, and involuntary terminations. The Board considered the issue and

resolved it against the company. Because McGuire Plumbing did not raise the issue
-3-

in its opening brief, we decline to consider it. See United States v. Brown, 108 F.3d

863, 867 (8th Cir. 1997).

We thus deny the petition for review and enforce the Board’s backpay order.

______________________________
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

August 11, 2003

Cooper Industries, Ltd.
600 Travis, Suite 5800
Houston, Texas 77002-1001

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of Cooper Industries, Ltd. (the "Company") and/or Cooper Industries,
Inc., as applicable, and in each related Prospectus of the use of our name and
the reference to an analysis, with which our firm assisted, concerning the
contingent liability exposure of the Company for certain asbestos-related
claims, under "Part I; Item 1. Financial Statements; Note 12. Asbestos
Liabilities", and under "Part II - Other Information; Item 1. Legal Proceedings"
included in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003.

No. 2-33-14542     Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries,
                   Inc. 1989 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

No. 333-02847      Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries,
                   Inc. Amended and Restated Directors Stock Plan

No. 333-64400      Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries,
                   Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan

No. 333-24237      Form S-3D Registration Statement for Cooper Industries,
                   Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

No. 333-101451     Form S-3D Registration Statement for Cooper Industries,
                   Ltd. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

No. 333-51439      Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries,
                   Inc. Director's Retainer Fee Stock Plan

No. 333-51441      Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries,
                   Inc. Amended and Restated Management Annual Incentive Plan

No. 333-37580      Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper (UK) Employee
                   Share Purchase Plan

No. 333-75475      Form S-3 Registration Statement for a shelf registration
                   to issue up to $500 million of debt securities

No. 333-99581      Form S-3 Registration Statement for a shelf registration
                   to issue a guarantee of up to $500 million of debt securities

Sincerely,

Charles E. Bates, Ph.D.
President and Senior Partner
Bates White Ballentine, LLC
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 159 (Monday, August 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 48818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19460]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Connected Vehicle Infrastructure Deployment Guidance Workshop; 
Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: ITS Joint Program Office, Office of the Assistant Secretary for 
Research, Technology, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department 
of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) Intelligent 
Transportation System Joint Program Office (ITS JPO) will host a free 
Connected Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) Deployment Guidance public 
workshop to seek stakeholder input on preparations by the Federal 
Highway Administration (FHWA) regarding the development of connected 
V2I deployment guidance and deployment coalition planning. The meeting 
will be held on Friday, September 12, 2014, from 9:30 a.m. (CST) to 
2:30 p.m. (CST) in the Cobo Center, 1 Washington Blvd., Detroit, MI 
48226, Room 310A. Remote participation will be available via web 
conference.
    To register for the workshop, please visit www.itsa.org/fhwaworkshop.
    The USDOT would like input from transportation infrastructure 
owner/operators on draft FHWA guidance aimed at supporting successful 
implementation and operations of connected vehicle technologies. It 
should be noted that the deployment of V2I technologies will be 
voluntary and is not coupled with the National Highway Traffic Safety 
Administration's (NHTSA) proposed rulemaking for Vehicle to Vehicle 
(V2V) communications.
    The primary target audience for this meeting is State and local 
Departments of Transportation, transit operators, other operating 
agencies, and infrastructure owners who are starting to plan for the 
deployment and use of connected vehicle technologies in their area. 
This meeting will also present the objectives of forming a deployment 
coalition to support implementation.
    While this meeting is specifically focused for an audience that has 
been following connected vehicle research and has been formulating 
plans for implementation, it is open to other stakeholders in the 
connected vehicle community, including national associations and the 
general public. The results of this meeting will inform FHWA's 
preparation of guidance and tools in support of V2I deployment.
    For further information, please contact Robert Arnold, FHWA, 
Director, Office of Transportation Management by at 
robert.arnold@dot.gov or by telephone at 202-366-1285. Agenda items for 
this meeting are subject to change.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on the 12th day of August 2014.
Stephen Glasscock,
Program Analyst, ITS Joint Program Office.
[FR Doc. 2014-19460 Filed 8-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

Thefollowing certification accompanies the issuer’s quarterly report on Form10-QSB and is not filed, as provided in Release 33-8212.  34-47551 dated May 13, 2003.

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with theaccompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Coast Bancorp for the quarterended September 30, 2006, I, Jack C. Wauchope, Chief Executive Officer of CoastBancorp, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  that:

(1)           such quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Coast Bancorp forthe quarter ended September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in such quarterly report on Form10-QSB of Coast Bancorp for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Coast Bancorp.

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coast Bancorpand will be retained by Coast Bancorp and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Dated:   November 13, 2006 |                          |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                            |                          |
|                            |                          |
|                            | /s/ Jack C. Wauchope          |   |
|                            | Jack C. Wauchope              |
|                            | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                            | (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
Faulk, Scott (OST) "'- :·_: .' I ,--
. . • .**~~.I** \_.. From: Michael Reeve, Reeve Air Alaska**<mreeve@reevecorp.com>~~:·;-_-J;.:::·-!** Wednesday, April 08, 2015 4:20 PM • ,·_:**~~~.: ~;~_:\·:':i=•i**  

### ·. 

## 3 Sent: To: Faulk, Scott (OST) Subject: Fwd: services to Tatitlek

-------- Forwarded Message --------

Subject:services to Tatitlek Date:Wed, 8 Apr 2015 18:45:13 +0000 (UTC) From:Roselene Vlasoff <rvlasoff@vahoo.com> Reply-To:Roselene Vlasoff <rvlasoff@vahoo.com> To:mreeve@reevecorp.com <mreeve@reevecorp.com> 

### To whom it may concern, · - ,r: ·.**~~** i '"'**':~.** ; • . 

### 'a cJ,J . _-,; ! I_; r. ;I· _) ;



### I would like to see Reeve's Air to continue to fly to Tatitlek to Anchorage Anchorage to Tatitlek

He is kind, helpful to the people, is helpful in town when we need to drop off boxes,

Thank you

Rosaline Vlasoff · Tatitlek, Alaska No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2015.0.5751 I Virus Database: 4315/9395 -Release Date: 03/27115 Internal Virus Database is out ofdate.

1
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5148 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5148

   To release certain wilderness study areas in the State of Montana.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2018

Mr. Gianforte introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To release certain wilderness study areas in the State of Montana.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Public Use of Public Lands 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RELEASE OF CERTAIN WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS IN THE STATE OF 
              MONTANA.

    (a) Finding.--Congress finds that, for the purposes of section 3(a) 
of the Montana Wilderness Study Act of 1977 (Public Law 95-150; 91 
Stat. 1244), the land in the State of Montana described in subsection 
(c) has been adequately studied for wilderness designation.
    (b) Release.--The land described in subsection (c) is no longer 
subject to section 3(a) of the Montana Wilderness Study Act of 1977 
(Public Law 95-150; 91 Stat. 1244).
    (c) Description of Land.--The land referred to in subsections (a) 
and (b) is--
            (1) the approximately 151,000 acres of land comprising the 
        West Pioneer Wilderness Study Area;
            (2) the approximately 32,500 acres of land within the Blue 
        Joint Wilderness Study Area not recommended for wilderness 
        classification in the record of decision prepared by the Forest 
        Service entitled ``Bitterroot National Forest Plan'' and dated 
        September 1987;
            (3) the approximately 94,000 acres of land comprising the 
        Sapphire Wilderness Study Area;
            (4) the approximately 81,000 acres of land comprising the 
        Middle Fork Judith Wilderness Study Area; and
            (5) the approximately 91,000 acres of land comprising the 
        Big Snowies Wilderness Study Area.
                                 <all>
```