alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Regulatory Evaluation
Docket No. 

### FAA- Directorate Identifier: 

### -AD



### lfyou make changes to !he values inlhe table bdow. you must ensure the totals update**according~v.** 

## If they do not, click (or Tab) imo and then ow**<~{the** 

### changedcell
. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, (e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + 

# u.s. for U
.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products Inspection 27.7 

### 419

The known number ofproducts in compliance: Total Costs ofcompliance for 

### U.S. fleet: $986,536 Costs covered under warranty 

### (if known) $
On-Condition Costs:

# ~ Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) testing, and close- replacement) up) We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide cost estimates for 

### the on-condition actions specified in this proposed 

### AD. 7

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumedor might not be obvious
. Thisjield can also be used to explain warranry costs) : 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

# 0 YES*0**NO~** 

### *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? 

# 0 YES*0**NO~** 

### *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number ofsmall entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. - YES 0**NO~** 

### Explanation: 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska
. Is 

### it appropriate to include specific requirements tor aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftranspmtation? 

# 0 YES* 

# 0**NO~** 

### *Explanation:



### 8
efc12-75_ex101.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


 




 


January 24, 2012







John G. Duffy


KBW, Inc.


787 7th Avenue


New York, NY 10019







Re: Notice of Non-Extension of Employment Agreement (“Notice”)







Dear Mr. Duffy:







Reference is made to the Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”), entered into by and between you and KBW, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), dated as of February 1, 2010. All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the definitions used in the Agreement.







Under Section 1 of the Agreement, on each anniversary of the date of the Agreement (each such anniversary, the “Renewal Date”), the term of the Agreement automatically extends to terminate on the third anniversary of such Renewal Date unless, at least thirty (30) days prior to the Renewal Date, the Company or you delivers notice to the other party stating that it desires or you desire (as the case may be) not to extend the Employment Period. Under the Agreement, the next Renewal Date will be February 1, 2012.







This letter constitutes Notice to you from the Company, delivered in accordance with Section 1 and Section 12(b) of the Agreement, that the Employment Period shall not be extended and, accordingly, the term of the Agreement will expire on February 1, 2014, subject to earlier termination in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.







Please execute this letter to acknowledge your receipt of this Notice and return one such executed original copy to the Company.














	 	 	Sincerely,	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	KBW, Inc.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Mitchell B. Kleinman	 
	 	 	Name:	Mitchell B. Kleinman	 
	 	 	Title:	General Counsel	 
	 	 	 	 







 


 


I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Notice, properly delivered to me.



 



	 	 	/s/ John G. Duffy	 
	 	 	 	  John G. Duffy	 
	 	 	 	 





 




 


 




	 	 	 	 






	cc:	Stephen W. Skonieczny, Esq.	 	 
	 	Dechert LLP	 	 
	 	1095 Avenue of the Americas	 	 
	 	New York, NY 10036-6797
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Q of MeriStar Hospitality
Operating Partnership, L.P. (the Registrant) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in
the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                                 
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald D. Olinger                           
|                       |  |  |  | Donald D. Olinger                               
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer                         
|                       |  |  |  | MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P.
|                       |  |  |  | MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp.              
|                       |  |  |  | MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. II           
|                       |  |  |  | MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. III
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-10660, 333-10662, 333-74498 and 333-74508) pertaining to the Novoste Corporation Stock Option Plan, the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, the Novoste 2001 Stock Plan, as amended, and the EmployeeStock Purchase Plan, as amended, of our report dated February 4, 2003, except for Notes 4 and 13, as to which the date is March 4, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Novoste Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form10-K/A Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Atlanta, Georgia 

April 7, 2003
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


           In connection with the Quarterly Report of Webtronics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yanina
Wachtfogel, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Yanina Wachtfogel
---------------------
Yanina Wachtfogel
President

August 13, 2002
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its condensed consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of the annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
controls over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls over financial reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2008
    By:
    /s/ KI NAMKI NAMChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Lithium Exploration Group, Inc.: Exhibit 10.19 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com





September 1, 2011 

 

Mr. Alexander Walsh 

  320 E Fairmount Dr. 
Tempe, AZ 85282

 

RE:   Termination of
Management Consulting Agreement 

Dear Mr. Walsh, 

          You and
Lithium Exploration Group, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a Management
Consulting Agreement, dated January 1, 2011 (the “Consulting Agreement”).
By execution of this letter agreement (this “Agreement”) you and the
Company mutually agree to terminate the Consulting Agreement effective as of
September 1, 2011. 

          Upon
mutual agreement, you will continue to serve as the President, Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary and
Treasurer of the Company on an at-will basis. For the avoidance of doubt, you
shall not be entitled to any payments of accrued obligations or severance as a
result of the execution of this Agreement and the termination of the Consulting
Agreement. 

LITHIUM EXPLORATION GROUP, INC.


 

	 	
    By:
	 
	 	 	Name: 
	 	 	Title: 


Dated: September 1, 2011 
Agreed and Accepted: 

 

Alexander Walsh
September 23, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MONIQUE DAVIS, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00207-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                  CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Year Ended December 31,
                                                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    2001           2000           1999          1998           1997
                                                -----------    ------------   ------------  ------------  --------------
                                                                    (Dollars in Thousands)

<S>                                                <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Income before provision for income taxes           $475,681       $370,577       $208,174       $296,777       $297,499
      Distributions in excess of equity
          earnings of affiliates                     42,942         67,904         80,660         44,939         27,282
      Equity earnings (losses) in excess of
          distributions                                  --             --             --             --             --
      Interest                                       77,047         92,838         96,648         99,926        125,492
      Amortization of previously capitalized
          interest                                    3,802          3,670          3,076          2,858          4,115
      Portion of rent representative of
          interest factor                            14,667         11,667         11,667         11,333         13,000
                                                   --------       --------       --------       --------       --------

          Income as adjusted                       $614,139       $546,656       $400,225       $455,833       $467,388
                                                   ========       ========       ========       ========       ========

Fixed charges

      Interest expense                             $ 77,047       $ 92,838       $ 96,648       $ 99,926       $125,492
      Capitalized interest                            1,500          4,000          7,000          5,000          7,000
      Portion of rent representative of
          interest factor                            14,667         11,667         11,667         11,333         13,000
                                                   --------       --------       --------       --------       --------


          Total fixed charges                      $ 93,214       $108,505       $115,315       $116,259       $145,492
                                                   ========       ========       ========       ========       ========

Ratio of earnings to
      fixed charges                                  6.59 x         5.04 x         3.47 x         3.92 x         3.21 x
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 99.1



FRIDAY DECEMBER 27 8:00 AM EDT

PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES ANNOUNCES SUCCESSFUL CONSUMMATION OF DEBENTURE
EXCHANGE OFFER

NEWPORT BEACH, Calif., Dec. 27 /PRNewswire/ -- Pacific Gulf Properties Inc.
announced today the successful consummation of its previously announced Exchange
Offer for any and all of its outstanding 8.375% Convertible Subordinated
Debentures Due 2001 at an exchange rate of 58 shares of Common Stock for each
$1,000 principal amount of validly tendered Debentures.

As of the expiration of the Exchange Offer at 5:00 p.m., New York time, on
December 26, 1996, an aggregate of approximately $42,069,000 in principal amount
of Debentures (constituting 74% of the outstanding Debentures) had been validly
tendered to the Exchange Agent pursuant to the Exchange Offer (including
$1,775,000 of Debentures yet to be physically delivered pursuant to notices of
guaranteed delivery), and the Company has accepted all validly tendered
Debentures for exchange. As a result, assuming the receipt of all guaranteed
deliveries, the Company will issue 2,440,002 new shares of its Common Stock
pursuant to the Exchange Offer, thereby increasing the number of outstanding
shares of Common Stock to 9,757,917. An aggregate of $14,437,000 in principal
amount of Debentures will remain outstanding.

Glenn L. Carpenter, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, stated "We are very
pleased with the results of this Exchange Offer. We have strengthened our equity
capital base and reduced our debt, which should enhance our ability to take
advantage of future growth opportunities."

Pacific Gulf Properties Inc. is a self-administered and self-managed equity real
estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, manages, leases, acquires
and rehabilitates multifamily and industrial properties located in California
and the Pacific Northwest. SOURCE Pacific Gulf Properties Inc.
EXHIBIT 23.1




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Nos.
33-3-3040, 333-67581, 333-67581-01,  333-67581-02,  333-67581-03,  333-67581-04,
333-72979 and 333-67579 on Form S-3 and Registration  Statements Nos. 33-3-3042,
33-3-3044,  333-27987,  333-95497  and  333-103009  on Form  S-8 of  UnionBanCal
Corporation  of our report  dated  January 15, 2003 (which  report  expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an exemplary paragraph relating to the adoption
of Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standards  No. 142,  "Goodwill  and Other
Intangible Assets"), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of UnionBanCal
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2002.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
    Deliotte & Touche LLP

San Francisco, California
March 14, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 3933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01129]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research; Amended 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel 
Developing Salivary Components as Therapeutics for Oral Health, March 
7, 2024, 12:30 p.m. to March 7, 2024, 5 p.m., National Institute of 
Dental and Craniofacial Research, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 
20817 which was published in the Federal Register on December 18, 2023, 
FR Doc. 2023-27744, 88 FR 87444.
    The meeting time has changed from 12:30 p.m. to 5 p.m. to 10:30 
a.m. to 5 p.m. The date of the meeting and the location remain the 
same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: January 17, 2024.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-01129 Filed 1-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 4274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01236]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-5-2024]


Foreign-Trade Zone 116; Application for Expansion of Subzone 
116F; Port Arthur LNG, LLC; Port Arthur and Jefferson County, Texas

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Board by the Foreign-Trade Zone of Southeast Texas, Inc., grantee of 
FTZ 116, requesting an expansion of Subzone 116F on behalf of Port 
Arthur LNG, LLC. The application was submitted pursuant to the 
provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-
81u), and the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400). It was 
formally docketed on January 18, 2024.
    The applicant is requesting authority to expand Subzone 116F to 
include a new site located at 3750 South Gulfway Drive in Port Arthur 
(Site 3, 25.089 acres). No additional authorization for production 
activity has been requested at this time.
    In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Camille Evans of 
the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make 
recommendations to the FTZ Board.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary and sent to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b3d2f211b2f293a3f3e753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5432202e1420263530317a333b22">[email protected]</span></a>. The closing period for their receipt is March 4, 2024. 
Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the 
foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period 
to March 18, 2024.
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
in the ``Online FTZ Information Section'' section of the FTZ Board's 
website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Camille Evans at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1754767a7e7b7b7239526176796457636576737239707861"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4f7d5d9ddd8d8d19af1c2d5dac7f4c0c6d5d0d19ad3dbc2">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 18, 2024.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-01236 Filed 1-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: September 25, 2014 105733 

________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

NEW YORK,

Respondent,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANTHONY M. BURKHART JR.,

Appellant.

________________________________

Calendar Date: August 4, 2014

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Egan Jr., Devine and 

 Clark, JJ.

__________

Dean C. Schneller, Plattsburgh, for appellant, and

appellant pro se.

Andrew J. Wylie, District Attorney, Plattsburgh (Nicholas

J. Evanovich of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lawliss, J.),

rendered February 4, 2013 in Clinton County, which revoked

defendant's probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant was convicted in October 2012 of criminal

possession of a weapon in the third degree and rape in the third

degree and was sentenced to lengthy terms of probation for both

crimes. He was charged with violating the terms of his probation

in November 2012 by failing to notify his probation officer that

he had been ordered to move out of his approved residence and

that he had been in contact with the police, by using the

Internet to view pornography, and by failing to participate in

substance abuse treatment. Defendant admitted to the violations,

after which Supreme Court revoked his probation and resentenced
-2- 105733 

him to an aggregate prison term of six years, to be followed by

postrelease supervision of 10 years (see Penal Law § 70.30 [1]

[d]). He now appeals, contending solely that the sentence

imposed was harsh and excessive.

We disagree and affirm. Defendant's conviction arose from

an incident wherein he forced himself upon a woman and then,

brandishing a box cutter, prevented her from leaving. Supreme

Court noted in resentencing defendant that it had initially been

willing to show leniency, notwithstanding the serious nature of

his crimes, because of his extremely difficult upbringing, mental

health challenges and substance abuse issues. Defendant's

immediate disregard of the terms of his probation led Supreme

Court to the conclusion, however, that a lengthy prison term was

necessary in order to protect the general public. Under these

circumstances, we discern neither an abuse of discretion by

Supreme Court nor the existence of any extraordinary

circumstances that would warrant a reduction of the resentence in

the interest of justice (see People v Long, 47 AD3d 1130, 1130

[2008]; People v Gurrola, 43 AD3d 1230, 1231 [2007]).

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Egan Jr., Devine and Clark, JJ.,

concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court