alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Gary S. Jacob, certify that:

1)    I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

2)    Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3)    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4)    The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



5)    The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);



|Date: November 14, 2007 | /s/GARY S. JACOBGary S. Jacob Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
sourceTypeID roadTypeID roadTypeVMTFraction

11 1 0.000000

11 2 0.559986

11 3 0.440014

11 4 0.000000

11 5 0.000000

21 1 0.000000

21 2 0.559986

21 3 0.440014

21 4 0.000000

21 5 0.000000

31 1 0.000000

31 2 0.559986

31 3 0.440014

31 4 0.000000

31 5 0.000000

32 1 0.000000

32 2 0.559986

32 3 0.440014

32 4 0.000000

32 5 0.000000

41 1 0.000000

41 2 0.559986

41 3 0.440014

41 4 0.000000

41 5 0.000000

42 1 0.000000

42 2 0.559986

42 3 0.440014

42 4 0.000000

42 5 0.000000

43 1 0.000000

43 2 0.559986

43 3 0.440014

43 4 0.000000

43 5 0.000000

51 1 0.000000

51 2 0.559986

51 3 0.440014

51 4 0.000000

51 5 0.000000

52 1 0.000000

52 2 0.559986

52 3 0.440014

52 4 0.000000

52 5 0.000000

53 1 0.000000

53 2 0.559986

53 3 0.440014

53 4 0.000000

53 5 0.000000

54 1 0.000000
54

2 0.559986

543 0.440014

544 0.000000

545 0.000000

611 0.000000

612 0.559986

613 0.440014

614 0.000000

615 0.000000

621 0.000000

622 0.559986

623 0.440014

624 0.000000

625 0.000000
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: July

14, 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Anita Lee, EPA Region 9 SUBJECT: July

14, 2015 Consultation Conference C all with Fort Mojave Tribe Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants **ATTENDEES**

 Luke Johnson, Environmental Director , Fort Mojave Indian Tribe  William Niebling, Senior Advisor , EPA Office of Air and Radiation  Colleen McKaughan , Associate Director, Region 9, Air Division  Ray Saracino , Region 9, Clean Energy and Climate Change Office  Anita Lee, Region 9, Air Planning Office  Ann Lyons, Region 9, Office of Regional Counsel **SUMMARY** A conference call was held between the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe and EPA on July 14 , 2015 to provide the tribe with a brief update of the publicl y - announced schedule for proposing a Federal Plan, and for taking final action on the proposed Clean Power Plan and Supplemental Proposal
. Mr. Johnson convey ed that the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe does not intend to pursue “treatment in a manner similar as a state” (TAS) in order to develop its own tribal plan. Mr. Johnson also convey ed the tribe’s strong support for the concerns and recommendations in the 13
- page comment letter on the Supplemental Proposal submitted by Calpine, owner and operator of the South Point Energy Center, during the public comment period. Mr. Johnson restated a few points from the Calpine comment letter, including the concern that 2012 was not a representative year, that natural gas
- fired combined cycle power plant s should be treated differentl y from coal
- fired power plants, and that the proposed goal for Fort Mojave was not appropriate. In th e event EPA develops a federal plan for Fort Mojave, Mr. Johnson expressed strong interest in continuing to be engaged in the process to ensure that the plan developed is appropriate for the tribe. EPA convey ed that Region 9 will be reaching out directly to Mr. Johnson when the final Clean Power Plan is released, and that we will seek to schedule additional consultation following the release of the proposed Federal Plan. **ATTACHMENTS**  none
### In The Matter Of: 

## SERVED: April7,2016 

## U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASIDNGTON, DC

Docket No. FAA-2015-3319 STONEMOTORS, INC. AND/ORDAVID STONE ) 

### ) ) ) ) 

### ) Case No. 2014SW700157 Respondent


### ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

## ''

OnMarch 11,2016, a Notice ofAssignment ofPrpceeding was filed, which assigned this proceeding to the undersigned Judge. · OnApril6, 2016, the Respondent filed its Withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing, stating "thattheparties have reached a settlement agreement resolving all issues inthis matter" Afterhaving reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; · 

### IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:. 1. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.215, the Respondent has withdrawn its Request for Hearing, andthis proceeding is dismissed with prejudice.

Attachment: Service List ·

### DocketNo. FAA-2015-3319 (Civil Penalty Action)



### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1



### Mr. James Archier 

### Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration EnforcementDivision, SouthwestTeam
. 10101 Hillwood Parkway Fort Worth, TX 76177 TEL: 817-222-5074 FAX: 817-222-5945 

### Mr. Cary G. Rochelle 

### Respondent's Counsel 2224 St. Michael Dr. Texarkana, TX 75503 TEL: 903-794-2224 FAX: 903-792-2380 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### U.S. AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 

### ONE COPY

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BY No. 85761

DEC 1 L 2022
ELEAB A. BROWN CLE F PREME COURI

CLERK BONNIE NYBERG QUAINTANCE, AN INDIVIDUAL IN HER OWN BEHALF AND AS THE SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR OFTHE ESTATE OF GARYALDEN QUAINTANCE, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTYOF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE DAVID M.JONES, DISTRICTJUDGE, Respondents, and THE PALMER LAW FIRM P.C., A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION;AND RICHARD B. HERMAN, P.C., A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRITOFMANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION This emergency petition for a writ ofmandamus or prohibition seeks a staypending appeal, in light ofthe district court's failure to hear a stay motion filed below before the morning ofan evidentiary hearing.

Having considered the petition and supporting documentation,
we are not convinced that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. SeePan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observingthat the party seekingwrit reliefbears the burden ofshowing such reliefis warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that writ



## 2z- 3gct.C1 SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A aneilW•reliefis an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in

determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Writ relief is available only when there is no plain, adequate, and speedy legal remedy, Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841; NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330, and here, petitioner may move for a stay in her appeal, which was docketed in this court last week. Nelson v. Heer, 121Nev. 832, 122 P.3d 1252 (2005), as modified (Jan. 25, 2006); NRAP 8. Thus, petitioner has an adequate legal remedy precludingwrit relief. Moreover, we are not inclined tointervenebefore the district court has had an opportunity to consider petitioner's stay motion. SeeNRAP 8(a); TRPFund VI, LLCv. PHHMortg. Corp., 138Nev.Advi Op. 21, 506 P.3d 1056 (2022). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.


## ACa. Hardesty Al4C;•,—.0 Stiglich

J. Herndon

cc: Hon. David M. Jones, District Judge Hatfield & Associates, Ltd. Law Office ofMary F. Chapman, Ltd. Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I947A 2
## Unite dState s Departmen t o f th e Interio r NATIONA

L PAR K SERVIC E

INREPLYREFIRTCl . Ai r Resource s Divisio

n TNAMER'IC A P.O

. Bo x 2528 7 ^ Denver , C O 8022 5 N361 5 (2350 ) Augus t 17,201 1

Ric k Boddicke r PM B 202 0 Sout h Dakot aDepartmen t

o f Environmen t

an d Natura l Resource s Jo e Fos s Buildin g 52 3 E Capito l Pierre , Sout

h Dakot a5750 1 Dea r Mr
. Boddicker : Th e National Par

k Servic e (NPS ) ha s reviewe d th e Sout h Dakot aRegiona l Haz e Stat e Implementatio n Pla n (SIP ) that wa s submitte d t o th e Environmental Protectio n Agenc y (EPA ) o n January 21 , 2011 , an drevision s t o th e SI P tha t yo u provide d o n Jul y 21,2011

. W e agre e with th e Departmen t o f Environmen t

an d Natura l Resource s (DENR)' s analysi s tha t sulfate , organi c carbon , an dnitrat e ar e th e majo r contributor s t o visibility impairmen t a t Badland s an dWin dCav e Nationa l Park s i n South Dakot aan d that , base d o n regional modelin g b y th e Weste mRegiona l A n Partnershi p (WRAP) , th e majo r source s o f

sulfu r dioxid e (SO2 ) ar e outside South Dakota

. W e not e that th e WRA P modelin g include d presume dSO

2 control s for

th e Geral d Gentlema n Statio n i n Nebrask aunde r th e Bes t Availabl e Retrofi t

Technolog y requirements

. Nebrask ai s no t proposin g t o implemen t thes e controls

. A s aresult , i t i s likel y tha t

th e sulfat e reduction s illustrate d i n Figur e 7

- 1(a ) an d(b ) an dth e visibilit y improvemen t goal s se t b y Sout h Dakot abase d o n th e WRA P modelin g wil l no t b e met , NP S i s recommendin g SO 2 control s a

t Geral d Gentlema n Statio n t o EP A an dNebraska

. W e encourag e Sout h Dakot aDEN Rt o consul t with Nebrask ao n reducin g contribution s fromth e Geral d Gentleman Statio n t o Badland s an dWin dCav e Nationa l Parks , A s par t of th e reasonabl e progres s analysis , DEN Rcomplete d afou r facto r analysi s of potentia l control s fo r

th e we t kiln s # 4 an d # 5 a

t th e Dakotah Cemen t

plant

. W e recommen dtha t

th e reasonabl e progres s analysi s shoul d als o evaluat e control s for th e large r kih i #6
. A s discusse di n ou r January 27,2003 , comment s t o DEN Ro n th e Preventio n o f

Significan t

Deterioratio n Permi t

fo r Dakotah Cemen t

kil n #6 , w e believ e tha t Selectiv e Non-catalyti c Reductio n technolog y i s afeasibl e optio n fo r cemen t kilns

.

### W

e appreciat e th e opportunit

y to wor k closely wit

h Sout h Dakot aDEN Rt o improve visibilit y condition s a

t ou r Nationa l Park s an dWildemes s Areas

. Fo

r furthe r informatio

n regarding ou

r conunents , pleas e contac t

Do n Shepher do f m y staf f a t (303 ) 969-2075

. Sincerely ,

^ Joh n Bunyak, Chie

f Policy , Planning an

d Permit Revie w Branc h

cc : 

### v/Gai l Fallon Ai r Qualit y Planning Uni

t (8P-AR ) US EP A Region 8 159 5 Wynkoo

p Stree t Denver , C O 80202-112 9
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of Report (date of earliest event reported): March 10, 2009
 
 MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
  
 Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of 
Incorporation or Organization)
    
    000-50499
(Commission File Number)
    
    01-0616769
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 4000 MacArthur Boulevard, East Tower
Newport Beach, California 92660-3095
 (949) 579-3000
 
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain OfficersItem 8.01 Other EventsItem 9.01 Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATUREEXHIBIT INDEXEX-10.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain
Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers
   
 Item 8.01 Other Events
  1.
    
    The election of Dwight W. Decker and Raouf Y. Halim as directors of the Company,
each for a term of three years;2.
    
    Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2009;3.
    
    Approval of the 2003 LTIP (as discussed above);4.
    
    Approval of an amended and restated Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. Directors Stock
Plan (the Directors Plan) which, among other things, would increase the number of
shares of the Companys common stock reserved for issuance under the Directors Plan from
288,000 shares to 468,000 shares; and5.
    
    Approval of a proposal granting the Companys Board of Directors the authority to
implement a stock option exchange program pursuant to which eligible employees
(excluding named executive officers and directors) will be offered the opportunity to
exchange their eligible stock options to purchase shares of common stock outstanding
under the Companys existing equity incentive plans for new stock options at an expected
lower exercise price.
  
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
  Exhibit No.
    
    Description10.1
    
    Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. 2003 Long-Term Incentives Plan,
as amended and restated.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURE
  MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date: March 13, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Brandi R. SteegeBrandi R. SteegeVice President, Legal, and Secretary




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description10.1
    
    Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. 2003 Long-Term Incentives Plan,
as amended and restated.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                                 Certification

   Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Nexstar Finance,
L.L.C. and Nexstar Finance, Inc. (together, the "Company"), hereby certifies
that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March
31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

<TABLE>
<S>                                                   <C>
Dated: May 20, 2003                                   /s/  Perry A. Sook
                                                      -------------------------
                                                      Perry A. Sook
                                                      President and Chief
                                                        Executive Officer
</TABLE>

   The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

127849 & (61)(65)(66) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

LAPEER COUNTY ABSTRACT & TITLE Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, COMPANY, and DON SCHULTZ, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 127849 

 COA: 245912 
 Lapeer CC: 01-030830-CZ

LAPEER COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS, 

COUNTY OF LAPEER, and LAPEER 

COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motions to file brief amicus curiae are GRANTED. The 

application for leave to appeal the October 21, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals 

leave to appeal is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, WEAVER, and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal. 

s0524 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 31, 2006 

Clerk
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8) pertaining to the Belden Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (No.
33-66830), the Belden Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (No. 33-83154, No.
333-74923, and No. 333-51088), the Belden Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Plan
(No. 333-11071), and the Belden U.K. Employee Share Ownership Plan (No.
333-75350) of our report dated January 31, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Belden Inc. included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 20, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1569 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1569

To provide for one additional Federal judge for the middle district of 
                               Louisiana.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 20 (legislative day, February 7), 1996

  Mr. Breaux introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for one additional Federal judge for the middle district of 
                               Louisiana.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL JUDGE FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA.

    The table in section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by amending the item relating to Louisiana to read as follows:

``Louisiana
        ``Eastern..............................................     13 
        ``Middle...............................................      3 
        ``Western..............................................   7.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Annual Report of Trimol Group Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods covered in the Report. /s/ Yuri
  BenensonYuri
  BenensonChief
  Executive OfficerTRIMOL
  GROUP, INC.April 17,
  2007 36
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**CALLISTO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**

**FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,2006**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

I am the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (“Form 10-Q”).

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Ihereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-Q fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|  *Date: May 22, 2006* |                       |
|---------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                            |                       |
|                            | */s/ Gary  S. Jacob*       |   |
|                            | * *                   |   |
|                            | *Gary S.  Jacob*      |
|                            | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

August 10, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00243

- CV

Edythe PRINCE and Jared Prince,

Appellants

v.

Sharon L

. PETERS , Individually and Sharon Peters Real Estate Inc.; Christopher Russo, Individually, and Christopher Russo Home Inspections PLLC: The Agency Austin, Inc., d/b/a The Agency San Antonio, n/k/a The Agency Texas, Inc.; Thomas J. Brown; Henry J ustin Sheppard; Joseph Keresztury; and Timothy Brown AND CityWorth Mortgage LLC and Its Successors in Interest; and Dep't of Veterans' Affairs Home Loan Program, Appellees

From the 198th Judicial District Court

, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CVOC

- 20

- 0000305
Honorable M. Rex Emerson , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was due to be filed with this court on August 9, 202 1

. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 35.1. After the due date , the Bexar County District Clerk notified this court that Appellant s have not paid the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and Appellant s are not entitled
to a free clerk’s record.

We ORDER Appellant s to provide written proof to this court within TEN DAYS of the date of this order that (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arra ngements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee, or (2) Appellant s are entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. See id. R.

20.1. If Appellant s fail to respond as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 10th day of August, 2021

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court