alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOSE VAZQUEZ-RAMIREZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-10036

D.C. 4:13-cr-00877-JGZ-BGM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 17, 2015** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Jose Vazquez-Ramirez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his jury-trial conviction and 63-month sentence for reentry after

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), Vazquez-Ramirez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are

FILED

FEB 24 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. 

Vazquez-Ramirez has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has

been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

We decline to review Vazquez-Ramirez’s pro se ineffective assistance of

counsel claim on direct appeal because this is not one of the “unusual cases where

(1) the record on appeal is sufficiently developed to permit determination of the

issue, or (2) the legal representation is so inadequate that it obviously denies a

defendant his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.” United States v. Rahman, 642

F.3d 1257, 1260 (9th Cir. 2011).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED. 

2 14-10036
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Webb Interactive Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William R. Cullen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ William R. CullenWilliam R. Cullen Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




Date: April 28, 2004
EXHIBIT 23
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  (1)
    
    Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-106140, 333-74578, 333-69501, and 333-108141, and
Form S-3 ASR No. 333-144339) of RF Micro Devices, Inc., and(2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-146027) of RF Micro Devices, Inc., and(3)
    
    Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-161126, 333-155524, 333-136250, 333-136251,
333-136252, 333-127300, 333-107805,
333-102048, 333-74230, 333-93095, 333-31037, and
333-147432) pertaining to the various equity incentive and employee
benefit plans of RF Micro
Devices, Inc.;
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1



                   [PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES INC. LETTERHEAD]




363 San Miguel Drive                                 CONTACT: Cindy L. Smith
Newport Beach, CA 92660                                       Investor Relations

(714) 721-2700

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE



                        PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES DECLARES
                 DIVIDEND INCREASE FOR SECOND CONSECUTIVE YEAR

        NEWPORT BEACH, California (November 6, 1996) -- Pacific Gulf Properties
Inc. (NYSE:PAG) today announced that its Board of Directors has increased its
quarterly dividend for the second consecutive year from $.40 per share to $.41
per share, effective with the Company's fourth quarter ending December 31,
1996. The dividend will be payable January 10, 1997 to shareholders of record
on January 1, 1997.

        According to Glenn L. Carpenter, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, the Board of Directors approved the dividend increase due to
the Company's strong performance during 1996, and the expected positive effects
from a number of acquisitions which were made in 1996. Carpenter also noted
that the increase is in keeping with the Company's long-term business strategy
to continue to lower its pay-out ratio as well as to share a portion of the
Company's growth with its shareholders.

        Pacific Gulf Properties Inc., a self-administered and self-managed
equity real estate investment trust, owns and operates industrial and
multifamily properties in California and the Pacific Northwest.


                                      ###

November 6, 1996
#### Seth Brunson, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion Filed June 18, 1915.

The evidence does not support the verdict.

Writ of Error to Criminal Court of Record, Duval County; J. M. Peeler, Judge.

Judgment reversed.

*7
      *Frank D. Brennan,*for Plaintiff in Error J

*T. F. West, Attorney General,*and *C. O. Andrews, Assistant,*for the State.

Per Curiam.

A careful reading of the testimony convinces us that the crime of assault with intent to rape, of which the-plaintff in error was convicted, has not been made out.

We shall not set out this testimony. We think our prior decisions in Rushton v. State, 58 Fla. 94, 50 South. Rep. 486; Clark v. State, 56 Fla. 46, 47 South. Rep. 481, and Hunter v. State, 29 Fla. 486, 10 South. Rep. 730, lead us to a reversal of this judgment.

Judgment reversed.

Taylor, C. J., and Cockrell, Whitfield and Ellis, JJ., concur.

Shackleford, J., dissents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

EDWARD ROMAN GARZA, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 131 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
##### 








---



##### 



Triad
Financial Corporation/s/
Mike L. WilhelmsMike
L. WilhelmsSenior
Vice President and CFO




---



##### 








---



#####
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10056 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus AKEEM OMOMEGI YUSUF, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CR-251-G

- - - - - - - - - - August 24, 1995 Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Akeem Omomegi Yusuf challenges the district court's restitution order. This court reviews particular awards of restitution for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Chaney , 964 F.2d 437, 451-52 (5th Cir. 1992). Under the Victim and Witness Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3663 (VWPA), restitution for victims can be awarded only for the loss caused by the specific offense that is the basis of theNo. 95-10056 -2- offense of conviction. United States v. Pepper , 51 F.3d 469, 473 (5th Cir. 1995) (citing Hughey v. United States , 495 U.S. 411 (1990)). To convict Yusuf of mail fraud, the Government had to prove a scheme to defraud, rather than specific incidents of fraud limited to individual investors. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1342; see also Pepper , 51 F.3d at 473. Because a fraudulent scheme is an element of Yusuf's offense of mail fraud, actions pursuant to that scheme are conduct underlying the offense of conviction. Pepper , 51 F.3d at 473 (citing United States v. Stouffer , 986 F.2d 916, 928 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 115 (1993)). The indictment specifically defined Yusuf's scheme to defraud in that it described the duration of the scheme, i.e. , "beginning in early May, 1994, and continuing thereafter until on or about July 12, 1994," and the methods used, i.e. , caused to be delivered an envelope containing a credit card in another individual's name. Therefore, it is specific enough to satisfy Hughey 's requirement that sentencing courts focus on the specific conduct underlying the offense of conviction. See Pepper , 51 F.3d at 473. Thus, the district court could order restitution for the loss caused by this scheme. AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mission Broadcasting,
Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form

10-Q for the three months
ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 13, 2004





/s/    DAVID S. SMITHDavid S. Smith President and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)




The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1648

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel HERCO TYME.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 with appropriate endorsement for employment in the

9 coastwise trade for the vessel HERCO TYME (United

10 States official number 911599).

Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1648

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

TYME.wise trade endorsement for the vessel HERCOissue a certificate of documentation and coast-
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 24, 2015.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-01448-CV

DELORES RUBIO, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF 

THE ESTATE OF WILLIE PEDRO RUBIO, JR., Appellant

V.

EXCELL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-01239-D

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill 

Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers

Before the Court is appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant has 

informed the Court that the issues on appeal have been resolved and the appeal is now moot. 

Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

141448F.P05

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DELORES RUBIO, AS PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF 

WILLIE PEDRO RUBIO, JR., Appellant

No. 05-14-01448-CV V.

EXCELL ELECTRICAL 

CONTRACTORS, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 4, Dallas County, Texas.

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-01239-D.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers. 

Justices Francis and Whitehill, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee EXCELL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. recover 

its costs of this appeal from appellant DELORES RUBIO, AS PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIE PEDRO RUBIO, JR..

Judgment entered this 24th day of July, 2015.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 4290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01266]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP24-328-000.
    Applicants: Southern LNG Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Dredging Surcharge Cost 
Adjustment--2024 to be effective 3/1/2024.
    Filed Date: 1/17/24.
    Accession Number: 20240117-5063.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/29/24.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is 
necessary to become a party to the proceeding. The filings are 
accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system (https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying the 
docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes.
    For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cf809f9f8fa9aabdace1a8a0b9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e2adb2b2a284879081cc858d94">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 17, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-01266 Filed 1-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Elbit Vision Systems Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sam Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/S/ Sam Cohen

Sam Cohen

Chief Executive Officer




July 15, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been


provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the


Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-65,848-06

EX P ARTE JOSE ISAAC REYES, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR-0932- 02-H IN THE 389th DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM HIDALG O COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ca pital murder and sente nced to life imprisonment. Applicant contends that hi s co unsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca use he failed to timely file a noticeof appe al. The trial court h as deter

mined, based upon the rec ord, that counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. We f

ind that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appea l2

of the judgme nt of conviction in Cause No. CR-0932-02-H from the 389th District Court of Hidalg o County
. Applicant is order ed returne d to that time at which he may g ive a written notice of appea l
so th at h e m ay th en, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaning ful appea l. Within ten day s of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr es en t ed b y counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant on direc t appea l. All time limit s shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosec ute an ap peal, he must take aff irmative steps to file a written notice of appea l in the trial court within 30 day s after the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this o pinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: June 11, 2014 Do not publish
32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund
IV, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Kimberly A. Springsteen-Abbott, Chief Executive Officer of the general
partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Kimberly A.
      Springsteen-AbbottKimberly
      A. Springsteen-AbbottChief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      14, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 4300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01310]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION NOTICE OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 89 FR 3402.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: Tuesday, January 23, 
2024, at 1:00 p.m. and its continuation at the conclusion of the open 
meeting on January 25, 2024.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. on January 
23, 2024.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-01310 Filed 1-19-24; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
FI LED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEV ENT H CI RCUI T FEB 22, 201 1 J OHN LEY CLERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 14 56 2 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 3 :0 1- cr-0 00 38 -HES-TEM-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Plai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us OTIS MCRAY, D efen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S tate s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (Feb ru ary 22 , 20 11 ) Befo re BLACK, HULL andW ILSON, Cir cu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: Mau ric e C. Gran t, II, ap po in te d c ou ns el forOti s M cRay inth is 18 U.S.C. § 3 58 2( c)(2 ) pr oc eed in g, h as m ov edto withd raw fro m furth er re pr es en tati onof t he ap pe ll an t an d fi le d abri ef p ur su an t t o And er s v. C al if orni a , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct .13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2d49 3 (1 96 7) . Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of the en ti re re co rdrev eal s

th atco un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re rec or d re ve al s n o a rg uabl e is su es of m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andMcR ay ’s sen te nc e i s AFFIRMED .

2
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 3/2007

of 4 January 2007         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 5 January 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 January 2007.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 4 January 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘            ZZ            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----