alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Names and Address of the Applicant is:

Mixed Media Solutions, LLC

DBA: Alienworx

Mark Nguyen | Mark Addona | James West

7214 Golden Isles Way

Savannah, GA 31410

(912) 662-5015

March 8, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Exemption Request under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and 14 CFR 

Part 11

Exemption No. 14148

Docket No. FAA-2015-4108

Dear Sir or Madam:

In reviewing our recent exemption approval, we have found that one of the multirotors that we requested was 

omitted from the listed UASs on our exemption. We originally requested the following five UASs:

1. Make: DJI

Model: Phantom 3 Professional

Type: Rotorcraft / Quadcopter

Maximum Weight (including payload): 1280g

2. Make: DJI

Model: Inspire 1 Pro

Type: Rotorcraft / Quadcopter

Maximum Weight (including payload): 3400g

3. Make: DJI

Model: Spreading Wings S1000+A2+Zenmuse Z15-GH4 (HD)

Type: Rotorcraft / Octocopter

Maximum Weight (including payload): 6350g

4. Make: DJI

Model: Spreading Wings S900+A2+Zenmuse Z15-GH4 (HD)

Type: Rotorcraft / Hexacopter

Maximum Weight (including payload): 5250g

5. Make: DJI

Model: Matrice 100

Type: Rotorcraft / Quadcopter

Maximum Weight (including payload): 3400g

Number 3 on the above list, the DJI S1000, was omitted and we would like to have that added to our list of 

approved UASs as soon as possible. We would also like to add some addition UASs to our petition at the same 

time if we are able to do this. Below is the information on the additional UASs. I am including the S1000 below as 

well for ease of reference:

1. Make: DJI

Model: Spreading Wings S1000+multiple gimbles/cameras

Type: Rotorcraft / Octocopter

Maximum Weight (including payload): 1.36kg – 6.9kg
2. Make: Steadidrone

Model: Vader Series

Type: Rotorcraft / Quadcopter/Octocopter

Maximum Weight (including payload): 31kg

3. Make: Steadidrone

Model: Mavrik Series

Type: Rotorcraft / Quadcopter/Octocopter

Maximum Weight (including payload): 5.88kg

4. Make: Steadidrone

Model: Formica Series

Type: Rotorcraft / Quadcopter/Octocopter

Maximum Weight (including payload): 31kg

5. Make: Freefly

Model: Alta

Type: Rotorcraft / Hexacopter

Maximum Weight (including payload): 13.6kg

6. Make: Microdrone

Model: md4-1000

Type: Rotorcraft / Quadcopter

Maximum Weight (including payload): 6kg

7. Make: DJI

Model: Inspire Series

Type: Rotorcraft / Quadcopter

Maximum Weight (including payload): 3400g

8. Make: DJI

Model: Phantom Series

Type: Rotorcraft / Quadcopter

Maximum Weight (including payload): 1280g

Thank you for your time and help in adding these additional UAS as soon as possible.

Thank you,

Mark Nguyen, Co-Owner | Mark Addona, Co-Owner | James West, Co-Owner

Mixed Media Solutions, LLC | DBA: Mixed Media Solutions, LLC

7214 Golden Isles Way, Savannah, GA 31410

(912) 662-5015

info@alienworx.media
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6138** 

JOSEPH COPPOLA , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Robert W. Trumble , Magistrate Judge. ( 3:15

- cv
- 00096

- GMG

- RWT )

Submitted : June 21 , 2016 Decided: June 23, 2016

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN , and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Joseph Coppola, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia; Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are n ot binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Joseph Coppola seeks to appeal the magistrate judge ’s order denying his motion for entry of default on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition . This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (20 12 ), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (20 12 ); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

-
46 (1949). The order Coppola seeks to appeal is neither a final

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss
the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10(a)


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 


 


We consent
to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 201 to Registration Statement No. 33-26305
on Form N-1A of our report dated November 23, 2011, relating to
the financial statements and financial highlights of BlackRock All-Cap Energy &
Resources Portfolio, BlackRock Energy & Resources Portfolio, and BlackRock World Gold Fund, each a
series of BlackRock Funds, appearing in the Annual Report on Form N-CSR of BlackRock Funds for the year ended September 30, 2011,
and to the references to us under the headings “Financial Highlights” in the Prospectuses and “Financial Statements”
in the Statement of Additional Information, which are part of such Registration Statement. 


	 
	/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
	 
	Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
 January 25, 2012
GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

MEMORANDUM 

DATE: June 1,2005 

TO: Natural Resources Standing Committee 

FROM: Patricia Mariella, Executive Director, DEQ 

RE: Proposal for a Two Hour Work Session on the TIP or Presentations at NRC 

Meetings 

Thank you for persevering with us through the final stages in the completion of the Tribal 

Implementation Plan for Air Quality (TIP). We have made presentations on the TIP in two 

districts, focusing on the open burning issues. The discussions have been substantial and 

complicated. Part of the challenge seems to be that many district residents would like to limit 

burning in residential areas, but they are very concerned about fire danger from weeds. They 

are particularly concerned because there do not seem to be any practical alternatives to burning 

weeds at this time. In this situation, it may not make sense to move forward now with any 

additional regulatory requirements until alternatives ways to get rid of weeds are in place. 

In addition, there are a few other parts of the TIP that we have not been able to specifically go 

over with you, particularly in the 'area source' sections. At the NRC meeting before the DEQ 

went out for public comment on the TIP, several Committee members suggested that we try to 

have a smaller scale work session dwing the public comment period, The DEQ Air Team 

would be glad to work with you to set up a shorter work session. But we would also be willing 

to go over materials during your regular meetings in June. 

The Public Hearing on the TIP is scheduled for June 22 in District 4. The Public Comment 

period ends July 1,2005. If you feel it makes sense to have a work session, would it be 

possible to have a two hour work session on June 23 or 24 (Thursday or Friday)? Are there 

other dates that work better? Or would it be more efficient to try to go over issues during the 

regular NRC meetings? 

We would like to talk about these options at your upcoming meeting. 
Page 1 of 1 

Janet Travis 

From: "Patricia Mariella" <Patricia.MarieIla@gric.nsn.us> 

To: "Daniel Blair (E-mail)" <air@gilanet.net,: "janet travis (E-mail)" <jtravis@gilanet.net>; "Leroy 

Williams (E-mail)" <williams@gilanet.net>; "Margaret Cook (E-mail)" 

<Margaret.Cook@gric.nsn.us>; "Russell Betsuie (E-mail)" <Rbetsuie@gilanet.net>; 'Willard 

Antone (E-mail)" <wantone3@gilanet.net> 

Sent: Thursday, June 16,2005 3: 19 PM 

Subject: TIP package to Patrick McMullen of John McCain's staff 

Team, 

For the administrative record, Annie sent a package to Patrick McMullen of 

John McCain's staff of the TIP notebook (Clean Air for Good Health). I 

also sent him information on JATAP (blueprint outline, joint proposal from 

last year) because he was very interested in teh project when I talked with 

him last month. 

I also sent him our air quality monitoring brochure, our GRIC DEQ latest 

brochure. 

Thanks 

Pat Mariella
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24
- 0166 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. JONATHAN LOUIS KESSLER ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 9 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 2 2024

07/02/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0166
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 4317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01163]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-1262]


Notice of Approval of Product Under Voucher: Rare Pediatric 
Disease Priority Review Voucher

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
issuance of approval of a product redeeming a priority review voucher. 
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) authorizes FDA to 
award priority review vouchers to sponsors of approved rare pediatric 
disease product applications that meet certain criteria. FDA is 
required to publish notice of the issuance of priority review vouchers 
as well as the approval of products redeeming a priority review 
voucher. FDA has determined that VEOZAH (fezolinetant), approved May 
12, 2023, meets the criteria for redeeming a priority review voucher.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathryn Lee, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-1394, email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e4a785908c969d8acaa88181a4828085ca8c8c97ca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d192b0a5b9a3a8bfff9db4b491b7b5b0ffb9b9a2ffb6bea7">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is announcing the approval of a product 
redeeming a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher. Under 
section 529 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360ff), FDA will report the 
issuance of rare pediatric disease priority review vouchers and the 
approval of products for which a voucher was redeemed. FDA has 
determined that VEOZAH (fezolinetant) meets the redemption criteria.
    For further information about the Rare Pediatric Disease Priority 
Review Voucher Program and for a link to the full text of section 529 
of the FD&C Act, go to https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DevelopingProductsforRareDiseasesConditions/RarePediatricDiseasePriorityVoucherProgram/default.htm. For further 
information about VEOZAH (fezolinetant), go to the ``Drugs@FDA'' 
website at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/.

    Dated: January 17, 2024.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-01163 Filed 1-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Ex hibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Feel Golf Co.,Inc.(the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I,  James
Crane, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78 m or 78o (d));
      and2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of  Feel Golf Co.,Inc.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  /s/
      James CraneJames
      Crane
 Chief
      Financial Officer,Principal
      Accounting
Officer
 
 Date: 
May 12, 2009
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.8



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
UroHealth Systems, Inc. (Form S-8, No. 333-           ) of our report dated
August 23, 1993, relating to the consolidated statement of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for Richard-Allan Medical Industries for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 1993.


                                        
                                        /s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
                                        ------------------------------
                                            BDO SEIDMAN, LLP



Kalamazoo, Michigan
January 8, 1997
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




Schedule of Outside Directors’ Annual Compensation

(Effective July 1, 2005)




Component



Board Retainer:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Presiding Director
	 	$125,000 ($31,250 per calendar quarter)
	All Other Directors
	 	$70,000 ($17,500 per calendar quarter)
	Committee Chair Retainer:
	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee Chair
	 	$15,000 ($3,750 per calendar quarter)
	Other Committee Chairs
	 	$5,000 ($1,250 per calendar quarter)
	ODEPP Stock Unit Accruals:*
	 	$	80,000	 
	Meeting Fees (Board of Committee):**
	 	 	 	 
	Attended Meeting
	 	$	1,700	 
	Telephonic Meeting
	 	$	1,000	 







*Under the Outside Directors Equity Participation Plan (the “Plan”), on the first business day of
each calendar quarter each director will have $20,000 accrued to his or her plan account. Amounts
accrued are converted into units equivalent in value to shares of Common Stock at the fair market
value on the accrual date. Directors may also choose to have 25%, 50%, 75% or 100% of his or her
retainer and meeting fees deferred and converted into share equivalents under the Plan.



**Meeting fees only apply for total meetings attended in excess of 24 per year.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Charles C. Baker,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of ZipRealty, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2010 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of ZipRealty, Inc.



|                       |  |     |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 3, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/    Charles C. Baker              
|                       |  |     |  | Charles C. Baker                     
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         CALLISTO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

FORM 10-QSB/A FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the Chief Executive Officer of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with
the Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 and filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-QSB").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-QSB/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 1, 2003




                                        /s/ Gary S. Jacob
                                        -----------------
                                        Gary S. Jacob
                                        Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME OF MONACO COACH CORPORATION
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 1, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,737
<ALLOWANCES>                                       199
<INVENTORY>                                     87,596
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               137,946
<PP&E>                                         103,293
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 246,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,058
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           189
<OTHER-SE>                                     143,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   246,727
<SALES>                                        780,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               781,815
<CGS>                                          658,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  707,972
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 71,842
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,081
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,761
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,761
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.26


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

1.     Fine Host Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation.

2.     Fanfare, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation.

3.     Creative Food Management, Inc., an Ohio corporation.

4.     Northwest Food Service, Inc., an Idaho corporation.

5.     PCS Holdings Corp., a North Carolina corporation (formerly known as HCS
       Management Corp.).

6.     Republic Management Corp. of Massachusetts, a Massachusetts corporation.

7.     Serv-Rite Corporation, a New York corporation.

8.     Best, Inc., a Minnesota corporation

9.     Ideal Management Services, Inc., a New York corporation

10.    Sun West Services, Inc., a New Mexico corporation

11.    Service Dynamics Corp., a New Jersey corporation

12.    Statewide Catering, Inc., a New York corporation

13.    Global Food Services, Inc., a Florida corporation

14.    Total Food Service Direction, Inc., a Florida corporation
# C_2008064EN.01006101.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/61

---

Action brought on 8 January 2008 — Evets v OHIM (DANELECTRO)

(Case T-20/08)

(2008/C 64/98)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Evets Corporation (Irvine, United States) (represented by: S. Ryan, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | That the decision R 603/2007 — 4 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 5 November 2007 be set aside; |
| --- | --- |

—

That the decision R 603/2007 — 4 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 5 November 2007 be set aside;

| — | that an order be substituted that the application for restitutio in integrum was brought within the time-limits as prescribed by Article 78(2); |
| --- | --- |

—

that an order be substituted that the application for restitutio in integrum was brought within the time-limits as prescribed by Article 78(2);

restitutio in integrum

| — | that the matter be referred back to the Fourth Board of Appeal for them to deal with the substantive issue as to whether all due care was taken to renew the trade mark concerned; |
| --- | --- |

—

that the matter be referred back to the Fourth Board of Appeal for them to deal with the substantive issue as to whether all due care was taken to renew the trade mark concerned;

| — | that the costs be borne by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

—

that the costs be borne by the defendant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The Community word mark ‘DANELECTRO’ for goods and services in classes 9 and 15 — application No 117 937

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Administration of Trade Marks and Legal Division: Refused the request for restitutio in integrum and declared the trade mark as deemed to have been cancelled

Decision of the Administration of Trade Marks and Legal Division:

restitutio in integrum

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal and declared the restitutio in integrum request as deemed not to have been filed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

restitutio in integrum

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 78(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94.

Pleas in law:

The applicant claims that the question of compliance with the two month time-limit set by the abovementioned provision for the filing of the application for renewal of trade mark registrations and payment of the renewal fee was not part of the appeal. Should the Court decide that the Board was entitled to examine this issue, the applicant alternatively argues that the time-limit was calculated in an incorrect fashion.

---
Commercial Assets, Inc.

                        Subsidiaries as of March 17, 2000



Casa Encanta Commercial, L.L.C.
CAX Acquisition Corp.
CAX Cannery, L.L.C.
CAX Cypress Greens II, L.L.C.
CAX Cypress Greens, L.L.C.
CAX DTR Securitization Corp.
CAX La Casa Blanca East, L.L.C.
CAX La Casa Blanca Mini-Storage, L.L.C.
CAX La Casa Blanca, L.L.C.
CAX Lakeshore, L.L.C.
CAX New Era Homes, L.L.C.
CAX Rancho Mirage, L.L.C.
CAX Riverside II, L.L.C.
CAX Riverside III, L.L.C.
CAX Riverside Maintenance, L.L.C.
CAX Riverside, L.L.C.
CAX Saddlebrook, L.L.C.
CAX Savanna, L.L.C.
CAX White Sands, L.L.C.
Commercial Assets Finance, Inc.
Fiesta MHP Investors, L.L.C.
Fiesta SPE, L.L.C.
Fiesta/Encanta MHP, L.L.C.
Lakeshore Utilities, Inc.
Lakeshore Utilities, L.L.C.
Riverside Golf Course and Marina, L.L.C.
Riverside Utilities, L.L.C.
Royal Palm Village, L.L.C.
Southern Palms MHP, L.L.C.