AGREEHEHT EXHIBIT 

# IJ:7EH5

# i

,

# . THIS AGREEMEHT, entered into this

## -Jq"'" day of January, 1983, by and between the CITY OF SANTA MONICA, amunicipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES whose address is 200 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, California, to (hereinafter referren 92660, "Contractor"), ismane with reference to the following: R E CIT A 

### L S: A. The City is amunicipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California with the power to carryon its business as it is now being conducted under the Statutes of the State of California and the Charter of the City. B. Contractor has presented a Proposal to the City for services tomeasure, forecast, and analyze aircraft noise at the Santa Monica Airport (hereinafter referred to as "Proposal"). C. City ann Contractor desire to enter into an agreement for performance of services set forth in Proposal upon the terms and conditions herein. NOW, THEREFORE, it ismutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as follows: 1. TERM AND TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.

1 asThe tern of this Agreement shall commence on the day



# . I, of January, ~983, and shall terminate on the first day of January, 1984, unless terminated earlier as set forth herein. In the event Contractor hereto fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions hereof at the time and in the manner required hereunder, Contractor shall be deemed in default in the perfornance of this Agreement. If such default is not cured within aperiod of seven (7) days after receipt by Contractor from City of written notice of default, specifying the nature of such default and the steps necessary to cure such default, City may terminate the agreenent forthwith by giving to the Contractor written notice thereof. Trois Agreement may be terminated by City, without cause, upon thirty (30) days written notice. 2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORr1EDBY CONTRACTOR. Contractor shall perform each and every service set forth in the Consolidated Scope of Work, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation under this Agreement shall not exceed the sum of Twenty One Thousand Dollars ($21,000). 3. COMPENSATIONS. Contractor shall be compensated for services performed pursuant to this Agreement in the amounts and in the manner set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. The total compensation under this agreement shall not exceed Twenty-One Thousand Dollars (S21,OOO), exclusive of direct non-salary expenses.
24. NOTICES.



### All ~~tices, demands, requests or approvals to be given unne~ this Agreement, shall be given inwriting and conclusively shall be dee~ed served when delivered personally or on the second business day after the deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, registered, or certified, addressed as hereinafter provided. All notices, demands, requests, or approvals frOM Contractor to City shall be addressed to City at:

3

### ••04 Santa r10nicaCity Hall 1685 Main Street Santa Monica, California 90401 Attention: City Manager All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from City to Contractor. s~all be addressed to Contractor at:

MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES 200 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach, California 92660 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Both parties hereto in the performance of this Agreement will be acting in an independent capacity and not as agents, employees, partners, or joint venturers of one another. Neither the City nor its officers or employees shall have any control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's e~?loyees, except as herein set forth. 6. INTEGRA~ED CONTRACTS. This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind of nature whatsoever between the parties hereto and all preliminary negotiations and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions hereof. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only by written execution signed by both City and Contractor.
7. COS~ OF LITIGATION. 4If any legal action is necessary to enforce any provision

hereof or "for danages by reason of an alleged breach of any provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive from the losing party all costs and expenses and such anount as the court may adjudge to be reasonable attorneys' fees for the costs incurren by the prevailing party in such action or proceeding. 13. Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless servants, boards and commissions, officers, agen , and

against any and all loss, damages, claims, costs and expenses, including reasonable fees, regardless of or outcome of any such claim or to the services or work cond Agreement. Contractor shall and save harmless the City, its Council, and commissions, officers, agents and employees from all claims and losses whatsoever, includi fees, accruing or resulting to all persons, or corporations furnishing or work, services, equipment or supplies in with services or or performed to this Agreement and of such

work, and from any and all claims including reasonable attorneys' fees, any person, firm or corporation for damage, injury death arising out of Contractor's operations. 59. PROHIBITION AGAINST TRANSFER.

Contr'ac

tor' shall not assign, sublease, hypothecate, or 01 transfer this Agreement or any interest therein directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise without the prior written consent of the City; any attempt to do so without said consent shall be null and void, and any assignee, sublessee, hypothecate or transferee shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Contractor, or of the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member or cotenant if Contractor if a partnership or joint venturer or syndicate or cotenancy, which shall result in changing the control of Contractor, shall be construed as an assignment of this Agreement. Control means fifty (50) percent or more of the voting power of the corporation.

10. cnUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which is an original, and all of which together constitute one and the same document. 11. PERMITS AND LICENSES. Contractor shall obtain and maintain during the ter~ of this agreement, all appropriate licenses, permits, and certificates that may be required in connection with the provision of services hereunder.

6I· •• Such licenses, permits, and certificates shall be obtained without add1tional expense to the City•

•• 12. KAIVERS. A waiver by the City or any breach of any term, covenant, or co~dition contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained herein whether of the same or a different character.

7HJ WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement
" to be executen the day and year first above written.

~

APPROVED AS TO FOR~: CITY OF SANTA MOnICA, amunicipal corporation

CONTRACTOR:

8

### CONSOLIDATED SCOPE OFWORK CITY OF SANTA MONICA CNEl CONTOURS AND NOISE ORDINANCE PROPOSALS

MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES 

# ,

~ 

### TASK 1.0 NOISE MEASUREMENTS Noise measurements will be made in the immediate community around Santa Monica Airport. These measurements will consist of noise measurements designed for the calibration ofthe INMcomputer program for generating noise contours around airports. Arepresentative sample of aircraft flyover noise data will be collected at 4 locations. These data will consist of the maximum noise level, Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEl), time of day, aircraft type, anddescription of flight path. All measurements will be made with a Digital Acoustics Portable Noise Monitor calibrated with acertified sound level calibrator. Five work days have been allocated forthis task. Inaddition, two 24hour CNEl measurements will bemade inthe community. TASK 2.0 DEVELOP CNEl CONTOURS

Task 2.1 .:.Define Base Case Operational Conditions. Prior to conducting the noise assessment, the base case operational conditions to which all potenttal alternatives will becompared to, must bedefined. Inconjunction with the City staff, airport manager, and consulting team, the base case operational conditions will be defined and all pertinent data collected. This will specify the conditions that exist atthe airport today, orplanned for some other specified time forwhich the City would like to compare alternatives. The definition of the base case conditions must be directed by City staff. Operational data that will be collected include:

-total number of operations

- aircraft mix -.flight tracks

-day/evening/night split of operations

- noise abatement procedures

- airport operational limits for aircraft specific flight profiles Task 2.2 Model Base Case Condition The operational assumptions defined in Task 1 will be computer modeled to determine the CNEl noisecontours forbase case conditions. The computer modeling will utilize the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) latest version (3.0) of the Integrated Noise Model (INM). Noise measurement data, if available for Santa Monica Airport, will be incorporated into the modeling effort for calibration and validation of the noise input data. This will be accomplished in order to increase the accuracy and confidence level of the noise contours. The product of this task will be noise contours for 65,60,55 and 50CNEL noise level.

-1- 

### 1/17/83

### Task 2.3 ~ Develop Alternative Operational Scenarios In this

task, various operational alternative scenarios forthe airport liwill be developed. The noise contours generated forbase case cenditions and the City's various land use plans forthe airport environs will play an integral role in the selection of the alternatives. City staff will be included in the process of developing the alternatives while coordinating with the Master Planning process. Up to nine scenarios will be defined for analysis. Theymay include:

-variations total number ofoperations

- aircraft mixmodifications

-day/evening/night distribution

- flight track modifications

- increased grade onapproach

- runway threshold

-airport restrictions

- specific noise abatement procedures Task 2.4
- Model Alternative Scenarios In this task the alternatives developed in Task 3 will be computer modeled to determine the CNEl noise contours for each of these alternatives. Noise contours will begenerated forthe 65, 60. 55and 50 (if 50 CNEl is technically feasible todefine) CNEl noise level for each alternative. The effect of the scenario onthe noise environment will bequantified interms of acres of landwithin each contour. Task 2.5
- Select andModel anOptimum Alternative Based upon 

# me-tne- analysis of~he prevTOus tasks, anoperational scenario that presents the optimum picture will bedefined andmodeled. City staff will make the selection ofthe final alternative to be modeled here. This scenario will inall probability derived from combining one or more of the alternatives analyzed previously. This scenario will represent the noise environment that will exist given the land useconstraints andthe goals and policies of the City of Santa Monica. Task 2.6~ Prepare Report The report will contain adescription of operational assumptions, modeling methodology and adiscussion ofthe effect of each alternative onthe noise environment. TASK 3.0 DRAFT NOISE ORDINANCE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Information developed from the CNEl contours. work done for the City of Santa Monica by Dr. Karl Kryter C'Guidelines forthe Assessment of the Impacts of~'5:>I-I"I-~~::: ;1·J'?-s3 

### Aircraft and Street Traffic Noise inResidential Areas," September 15, 1982),ftV\,\\~';),D 

### ,\d~e().Federal Publications, and other sources will be used todevelop anew noise ·--7'ordinance for the airport. We will provide technical assistance in the development and drafting ofthis ordinance including evaluating the impacts

-2- 1/17/83/ 

### of the ordinance and implementation of the ordinance. While we cannot

provide any legal assistance, the noise ordinance must be based on technically complete and accurate concepts.


### " TASK 4.0 EHVIRONMENTAl DOCUMENTATION The adoption of arevised noise ordinance forthe City of Santa Monica will require environmental review bythe City. 'Forthe purposes of this proposal it has been assumed that anEIRwill beprepared for this action. Mestre Greve Associates will prepare the necessary EIR and assist the City in meeting the processing requirements ofCEQA. Asper the requirements of CEQA it has been assumed that this will be "tccused EIRII 

### which will address the impacts of the noise ordinance onnoise and the aviation system. Economic impact analysis is beyond our capabilities and is 

### not included in 

### this proposal. TASK 5.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS Mestre Greve Associates will provide support atpublic hearings onthe noise ordinance and environmental documentation. The following number of public hearings have been budgeted:

Noise Ordinance: Airport Commission
- 2 City Council
- 2 ..~ , 

### EIR: City Council
- 1 Additional hearings will bebilled to the City atthe hourly rate of $40/hour.

-3- , 11 '7Is:t~" 

# .

COST Costs for the work proposed here has been estimated assuming close coordination between City staff andourselves. We have also budgeted time for outsi~e consultants to assist 1nmeeting CEQA requirements andto analyze aviation sy~tem impacts. The costs aredetailed below.

ITEM COST



# -------------------------------------- Noise Measurments $3200 Develop CNEl Contours $7800 Ordinance Technical Assistance $2000 Environmental Impact Report $5000 Public Hearings $1600 Supplies andMaterials $19600 $ 

### 500 Subtotal:
Total: $20100
TIME SCHEDULE The time schedule for completion of this program isdependent on the completion of certain tasks ofthe Master Plan aswell as coordination with the City Attorney's office. Based onthe schedule forthe Master Plan. the following schedule 1sproposed: TASK COMPLETION DATE

.1.0 2.1, 2.3, 2.5, Noise Measurements February 15 2.2 Existing Contours March 31 (see note 1) 2.4Alternative Contours April 30 2.6 Final Contour, Report 2weeks after selection ofMaster Plan Concept alternative August 1 } 

### Estimated, scheduleto be coordi nated September 1 

### City Attorney andMaster Plan St

### udy. 

# =~---------------- 3.0 Draft Noise Ordinance 4.0 

### EIR with

TERMSAll work done under this program will bebilled tothe City of santa Monica onamonthly basis forwork completed during themonth. Invoices will identify work completed for which billing has been submitted. Terms for payment are 30 days net.AGREEMENT



# ,, THIS iGREEMENT, entered into this Ie":'

. ,I day of January, 1983, by and between the CITY OF SANTA MONICA, amunicipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and CH2M HILL CALIFORNIA, INC., whose address is 1301 Dove Street, Newport Reach, California, 92660, (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor"), ismane with reference to the following: R E CIT A L S: A. The City is amunicipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California with the power to carryon its business as it is now being conducted under the Statutes of the State of California and the Charter of the City. B. Contractor has presented a Proposal to the City for services to prepare amaster plan for the Santa Monica Airport (hereinafter referred to as "Proposal"). C. City and Contractor desire to enter into an agreement for performance of services set forth in Proposal upon the terms and conditions herein. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as follows: 1. TERM AND TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. The term of this 

## I~ Agreement shall commence on the -/ day of January, 1983, and shall terminate on the first day of January,
11984, unless terninate~ earlier as set forth herein, or extended by written ~utual agreement •

•• This Agreement may be terminated by either party by seven (7) days written notice in the event of substantial failure to p~rfor~ in accordance with the terms hereof by one party through no fault of the other party. If terminated when a Task Order or portion thereof is in effect due to the fault of others than the Contractor, the Contractor shall he paid for services performed to the date of termination, including reimbursements then due, plus terminal expense as established in each Task Order agreement. If no Task Orner is in effect at the time of such termination, then no termination expense shall apply. If ~he termination is nue to the fault of the Contractor, the City is not ohligaten to pay any fees or ex~enses set forth in Paraqraph 3 hereof which specifically involve the item of fault. This Agreement may be terminated by City, without cause, upon thirty (30) days written notice. In this event, termination expenses shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph. 2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORHED BY COfJTRACTOR. Contractor shall perforM each ann every service which it is requested to perform by written Task Order as given to it by the City. Each Task Order or portion thereof shall outline the scope of services to be performed, delineate any special conditions, state the amount of fee authorized, describe the fee basis, state the time of completion, and outline the output requested. Upon

2executLor; o~ each Task Order or portion thereof, it sha11 he

in=o~porate~,herein by this reference .

•• Contractor shall hegin the work for services lister. in the ':"as}: On3er(s) ir.L"1e~iatelyupon receipt of a written Notice to Procee~ issue"lry the City.

I~ is understoo~ that Contractor is under contract to the Cit.y projects involving the Santa Monica Airport ann shall n~t accept any work or assignnents from any tenant on t~e Sa:-;~c:; ~;or.ica

~.irport f.uringthe tern of this Agreenent_. 3. CO!:re'SATIm,s. ContT~ctor shall be compensate, for services perforMe~ purs~ant t~ this Agreement on the basis ~escrihec1 in each Tas~ Order. 7~e total conpensation unner this contract shall not excee~ t~e ~u~ of Fifty-Six Thousan~ Three Hundre~ Dollars ($56,38C), exclusive of f.irect non-salary expenses oS nefine~ herein. A. For a~visory anr.planning services, the City shall pay the C~ntractor a lunp sum fee, or a fee in accoraance ~ith Sche:4ule A, attached, which is the Employee Classification and Rate Schec1ule which will he revisen on an annual basis and providej to City accordingly, ann direct non-salary expenses at actual cost, as estahlishea for each project. B. For engineering services, the City shall pay the Contractor a fee as prescribed in the American Society of Civi1 Engineers r-1anual No, 45 "A Guide for the Engagement of Engineering Services", unless the City ana Contractor mutually agree upon another fee hasis. 3

## .. C. Any amount over the estimated cost of services as set forth in a Task Order or project or work beyond the scope of each 

# .\ project will be negotiated and agreed upon between the Contractor and the City in writing and a separate Task Order attachment prepared prior to the beginning of actual work. D. The Contractor's direct non-salary expenses are defined as the costs incurred on or directly for the project, other than payroll costs. Such direct non-salary expenses shall be computed on the basis of actual purchase for items obtained from commercial sources and on the basis of usual commercial charges for items provided by the Contractor. Direct non-salary expenses shall includ~, but not be limited to, necessary transportation costs, meals and lodging; laboratory tests and analyses: computer services; magnetic card typewriter service; telephone; postage: shipping; printing; hinding; and ~ultilith charges.
~. The City shall pay for the services performed by the Contractor as the work progresses, based upon work completed. Invoices shall be submitted by the 10th of each calendar month by Contractor. Payment shall be due and payable within 30 days after receipt. F. No deduction shall be made from the Contractor's fee on account of penalty, liquidated damages, or other sums withheld from payment to any other party. 4. NOTICES. All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under this Agreement, shall be given in writing and conclusively shall be deemed served when delivered personally or on the second 4business day after the deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage p~epaid, registered, hereinafter provided. All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from Contractor or certified, addressed as

to City shall be addressed to City at:

5Santa Monica City Hall ,~ 1685 Main Street Santa Monica, California 90401 Attention: City Manager All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from City to Contra~tor s~al1 be annressed to Contractor at:

CH2M HILL 1301 Dove Street Newport Beach, California 92660 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Both parties hereto in the performance of this Agreement will he acting in an in~ependent capacity and not as agents, employees, partners, or joint venturers of one another. Neither the City nor its officers or employees shall have any control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's employees, except as herein set forth. 

### no permitted or required approval by the City of personnel, costs, scheaules, documents or services of the Contractor shall be construed as making the City responsible for the manner inwhich the Contractor performs its services or for any negligence, errors or omissions of the Contractor. Such approvals are intended only to give the City the right to satisfy itself with the quality of work performed by the Contractor. 6. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES The Contractor's services will be generally accepted professional furnished in accordance engineering practice and with 6principles and technical standards. The Contractor makes no other warranty ei~her expressed or implied. 7. INTEGRATED CONTRACT. This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind of nature whatsoever between the parties hereto and all preliminary negotiations and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal agreement or i~pliea covenant shall be held to vary the provisions hereof. Any Mo~ification of this Agreement will be effective only by written execution signed by both City and Contractor~

8. COS~ OF LITIGATION. If any legal action is necessary to enforce any provision hereof or for danages by reason of an alleged breach of any provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive from the losing party all costs and expenses and such amount as the court may adjudge to be reasonable attorneys' fees for the costs incurred by the prevailing party in such action or proceeding. ~

# _.

~ - ;.j 'C_" 9. HOLD HAR~1LESS. Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its

.... -r".. / Council, servant~ boards and commissigns, officers, agents~ and employees from and~gainst any and~ loss, damages, liability, 

### ", ~ -, .~ claims, suits, costs '·,.and expenses, whatsoever, including 

### ..•
<, reasonable attorneys'-~ees, regardless of the merit or outcome of 

### <, any such claim -orsuit, arising 

### fr~ or in any manner connected to

.... the services or work conducted pursuant~to this Agreement. 

### , 7/

Contractor shall indemnify, defend and save harmless the City, its '\Council, servants, boards and commissions, officers,

~ agent5 ann employees from ann against any and all claims and lOS5e~ whatsoever, including reasonable attorneys' fees, accruing or resulting to any and all persons, firms or corporations furnishing or supplying work, services, materials, equipment or supplies in connection with services or work conducted or perfornea pursuant to this Agreement and arising out of such activities or work, and from any and all claims and losses whatsoever, including reasonable attorneys' fees, accruing or resulting to any person, firm or corporation for damage, injury or death arising out of Contractor's operations. 10. PROHIBITION AGAINST TRANSFER. Contractor shall not assign, sublease, hypothecate, or transfer this Agreement or any interest therein directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise without the prior written consent of the City; any attempt to do so without said consent ~hall be null and void, and any assignee, sublessee, hypothecate or transferee shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Contractor, or of the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member or cotenant if Contractor if a partnership or joint venturer or syndicate or cotenancy, which shall result in changing the control of Contractor, shall be construed as an assignment of

8this Agreement. Control means fifty (50) percent or more of the voting power of the corporation. ,\•• It is understood by the City and the Contractor that the FAA or other state or Federal agencies are not a party to this Agreement and will not be responsible for associated costs except as should be agreed upon by the City and the agency under a grant agreement. 11. COur;':'ERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which is an original, and all of which together constitute one an~ the same document. 12. PER~nTS AND LICENSES. Contractor shall obtain and maintain during the term of this agreement, all appropriate licenses, permits, and certificates that may be required for the provision of services hereunder. Such licenses, permits, and certificates shall be obtained without additional expense to the City. 

### 13. WAIVERS. A waiver by either party of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained herein whether of the same or a different character.

9ITJ WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement

to be execu~ed the day and year first above written.



### " CITY OF SANTA MONICA, a municipal corporation

APPROVED AS TO FOR~l: /; 

# . A A ~, ....-v /.' /' //
- /'? . .: / ./-" ,/ 

### By,-i~/- 

# I~c;;:.N~ ALSCHULER, JR. I / ty Manager 

# i" L'

ROBER? ~j. MYERS City Attorney conTRACTOR:

10~ASK ORDER 

## no. 1 SCQP!: OFSFRVICr:S

II '"'}-,' •'.•1S Tas~: 1 to the Professio~al Services Agree~~~t

, 19E2, between the City of Santa Monica,



## --------

!:c• c~":ed here inafter calIEd'. CLIEn,:" ar.c. CP.2~1 HIL:" I!:C., hereLnafter called COI:SUI::')I.r,:, • CI---O~,·_" .••.•. ~..•.. ;-

_;-\~~.l./'1 , t~;.:::?::;·.~,

the CL!I:!:':' CE'

sires to use the services of the CO:~- in ccr.necticn with the preparation o~ a
\"'::'C't=E" (:~ t:':: 

### co~~s:·:::';\.~~':' as per Sectio;; ~~,A:-ticle 2 cf tl)c: Ac;::."r.:e!""?il

t for the fo:!.lm:i!".g r>roject . 

### !~o~:'.:':::::i\T:?Or:r:,that in consideratLon of the r'utu:.l covenents E~~ Acreernents herein containe~, the pn.rties ~o rnutual1~' aorsc c~ folloh'S:

acc~rt~ a~c a~rees to perform the elements of this PP.O~EC'.:'. B. SCOP[ 0: 

### \x'p.r c~-,r!:!7':'desires to have a master plan of the Santa 110nica Air~0:--t prepered by COI~St:L':::'ANT, and to have CONStJL7ArJ'.:' ccnduct r(?C'!u~ar\'lQ:(king rne:.~ting~ during the course of the study fa::- 't!-:ebenefit of CLIE!i':'C\ndits invitees, arid to cancuct three (3) public Meetings for the benefit of the ge~eral public for this stUdy.7hjs ~as~~r plan stud" is to follow the suggested outline

:C~ mester plans as ~i'"e'1 inAdvisor:' Cdrculzr 150/5070-6, \;i~.~~ a specifLc outLine aE; given be1ev •• 

# I,

•• PHA~:r 'T' - ,\":P.PO:R':'p.:S0.t·:p:::!~r:!·':'f: ':'.... cs Phase

### 0: :.hf> studv i!=' cor.cerned \-:i

th the co1- lectio~ 

## 0: r.atn,th~ preparation of.forec2sts, co~pnriS0~ ~~ the forecasts with th~ existin~ capacity, ar.~ .~~ ~i~~u~sion o~ the role of.the Airport with the con-
(:c-.t::: c-?'"elo;::-c( in t.his Pha se, Exis"::ir.9 dat.a , c:rcwinos 2~~ reports will be used to the fullest e~t~nt p0ssible.

F.i~tcrica1, curre~t, anc forecast statistics will be ~~~~ere~ e~ n~iatior datc:,socioeconomic statistics and 0t~er rele~a~t su~jects necessary to establish P fcc::'",cation

for fcrecastLnc aviatior: ectiv.i tv, In:or~ation, data, and drawings on the ph~sical aspects o~ th~ Airport ~iJl be gathered, inc1udin~ propertv lines, Leese lines, utiLities, easements, and the phys> ical fentures of thf'field. Data pertaining to soil corditions and drainage will be gatheref for use in making cost estimates for improvements. Information, dctc, and dra~ings will be gathered on surrounding land uses including land use, zoning, and general environmental considerations. Data on noise contours are being developed by others, but will be incorporated into the data base for this study.:n a~dition, data will be assembled on property owners~ip, gra~t agree~ents, lease agreeme~ts, City rules a~( r~~ulatio~s that a::ect the Airport, court ru:~n~s, " and.ot:-'f";!"

r-eCJulator~'

or contractual obliqations.

FC'Y(:ca stS 0: aviatiori ac'ti vit.v at Santa l~o:lica p.irpo.rt ~ill be ~Eveloped fer the years 1987, 199:, 20C2, and :~15. 7he in~ividual ite~s to be in('Judedin the foreo ~ircraft Operations, ir.cludin~Local and Itinerar.tOpera'tions
o Instru~ent Operations
C! 11:;.::

## 0: the BasedAir-craftFleet

!~t~c event that the role of the Airport is to includ~ COT'1!"':l1~E:r

opera":ions, the" an estir'late will be made 

## 0: thE-potentia 1 Jeve1

## 0: activity for these operations, inclufing: nunber of operations, number of passengers, an~ type of aircra~t. These forecasts will be for unconstrained growth. Unconstrained forecasts also serve to point out the existence of any need to constr-aingrowth so that the Airport does not adversely impact the environment or grow beyond the capacity of the field nor compromise safe operational factors. Where constraints are introduced into forecasts, the resultant forecasts will be given.The fr~cr.astsdeveloped in Task 2will he trar.slntee



## . ,\ 

### . 

## . l~t~ ca~Rclty rC~Ulrene~ts for the keY elerne~ts o~ the ~Rsig~. These will thE~ be cc~pare~ with thp existing c~p?~ity o~ the 2ir~ort nne a~y short~alls or ove~ages ':ill he noted. For the Santa Monica Airport, the key

open;tions V t:"



### -

# . runway capacity
2\'ailalJJc If approp~iate: comr..uter passengers vs. terninal space available and cor.tTTJuter passengerF. vs. auto parking space_available '.:'he t.he

oretIcaI capacity 

## 0: the runway systen ,.,i 11 be calcul;:;tcG

using the Fk; guidelines and planning nanuale an~ will be Axpressed in terms of pea~ hour c~~~city a~c annual capacity. To>~~. 4
- FaciIitv Rcouirer'ent Deternination The cc~parison 

### c: the constrained demand ,~~.existing cap~cities a~ the Airport will serve to identify the short~A!ls OY overages that nay exist. In this Task a listjn~ will be developed showing the facility requireme~ts which will be incorporated into the actual field pla~ning. Included in this listing will be these elernents:

o Runway length and widtho Runway lighting and light aids

o Navigational aids
•• o Taxiway width(s) applicable to this design

o Number of tie downs required, based on aircraft mix

o Number of T-hangars required

o Number of maintenance hangars

o Number of FBO leaseholds to accommodate demand

o Size of clear zones'

o If appropriate: size of commuter terminal and number of commuter parking spaces needed ~ At this point, it is recommended that the first general public meeting be held to present to the public the data gathered, the forecasts that have been made. Public comments will be noted. Up to this point, the role of the Airport will have been the subject of informal discussions in the working meetings and with City staff. The role of the Airport should be formalized at this point. The environmental assessment, and the actual planning of the Airport will be affected by thisdecision, hence the importance of finalizing this element

before proceeding with the alternatives. 

# I' 04 Task 5
- Environmental Study This task will utilize the noise contours developed by others. These contours, representing levels of noise annoyance for the expected aircraft mix and number of operations, will be used to assess the impact of operations, will be used to assess the impact of aviation activities upon the Airport and surrounding areas. From this ana~ysis, various mitigation measures can be suggested which may influence the design or the operation of the Airport. Based upon a preliminary assessment of the development alternatives, it is not expected that significant adverse impacts will be realized; however, should some negative or adverse impacts be identified during this task, the task will identify and recomnend appropriate research and analysis to be undertaken in order to prepare an EIR/EIS. This master plan study does not contemplate the preparation of a full EIR/EIS, nor has one been included in the budget. Task 6
- Concept Alternatives Based upon the information and data that has been developed in prior tasks, plus an assessment of the comments from the first public meeting, a design concept for the airport will be prepared. This conceptual drawing will not be prepared to the detail of an Airport Layout Plan, but will have sufficient detail to adequately develop the ideas and concepts for the various facilities and types of aircraft to be accommodated. Following the second public meeting a revised conceptual drawing will be prepared. Upon approval of this concept, the study will proceed to the next tasks.f02.JC''inC]the corno letion of Task 6, it is recommended that

~~~ saco~{ p~hlic rnee~i~gbe held to present the ,-arious r0~cep~ alternA~ives to the public an~ obtain their reMarks 

## t' a;>rcor..,ents.
t\..· nis in th~ s~u~~',th~ s8canc major ~eriEion must h,.. J ,_ ~a~e resarding w~i~h o~ the concept alternatives is to be 2~0n~e~. AJ,thouc~ nc n~~'conc~pt drawin~s will be rna~~, tte n: the concepts can be incorporatec ':.."'--

.. : -.

~hiE chase 0: a Mester planning stud~'iF concer~e~ wit~ the rrorer selectien 

## 0: a site for a new airrort. It if'not appropriate for this s~~c:-a!1~hAE not been i~cludeQ in the scope of w~rk.

F~~sp III hegins the sec~nd part c: the Moster plan s~ucy. In th~~ phase the material prepared in P~cse I will be documented in report forMat, the official 2irp~Tt plAn~ will be drawn, and the economics of i~r~e~entins the pla~ will be determined. The draV'ings pre?ar0.c in this pha~e will be based on an approved or ade~~ed design from Task 6 "Concept Alternatiues." Task 7
- Airc0rt Lavout Plan Se~



## . The o~ficial Airport Layout Plan for the Santa Honica Airport will be prepared on a suitable base drawing or map to a scale that allows thp maximum amount of detail to be shown.Alsc inclu~e~ in the set will be the rlr~wings listed in ~u~se~ue~t tas~s. The Airport Layout Plan will shot' curre~~ a~~ phase~ ~evelopment, a~ well as such fea

# .~ tures as: 04 o R:.:n\lC",', taxiwavs, aprons, fieLd lig~ting,

extended runway safety areas, clear zones, n~vinational aid~, field marking, buildings, roads, pa~king lots, fences, maior drainage ~a~i!ities, segmented cir~le, wind indicat0rs, airport beacon, etc.
ditches, stee~ slop~s, D0wer lines, towers, etc. )

o Areas reserve~ fer present a~d futu~e aviation develop~ent

~ rUElin? fccilitie~ anc bulk storaqe areas
c Aircra:-t storage a~eas and ha~gars

o Airport D0undaries, City boundaries, etc.
o Azimuth of runwav and north point.s \:1 th mag- +-. • +-' !"'1'?_lC varla_~on

o Pertinent dimensional data, including clearance~ ?r.d limitation lines.The La~~ Cse Plan will provide guidan~e for the utili-

,I zation o~ lanf w~thin the preRe~t boun~~rieE o~ the Airport. Thns~ ro~tio~s not re~uired for a~iatio~ usage "ill be identified, and those portions on the ulti~Ate Airport will be subdivided into appror~iate cla~si~ic?tions, such as:

Aircr~~t Operat,ional Area
o ";'·':2t:'on C07'J".ercial

Aviation noncor.'lr::ercial, ana such other are2E ('IS appropriate Th0~~ Do~tiQn~ o! the Airport not required for ~viation purposes \-:i17 have the restrictions or liT:1i tations identi~':~fw~ic~ will keep the property co~patihle with t~e AirrG~~ o~e~~tio~~. ~hese restrictions or linit~- ticns will be i~ a~~ition to those prepared in T~sk 10.

This t~sk provides the same inforMation as the "Terminal Area Plan" listed in the Advisory Circular. The ~rawing is an enlarger.'lent of the tie down areas, the FDO areas, r.angararens, and such facilities as r.'light lie within these area~. This drawing provides greater detail of these areas and usually provides more dimensional data than are pcssible to show on the Airport Layout Plan.~ask 10
- Hp-iqhtLi~it Plan

?his r.r;:n,inc;

is provideci in Iieu of the Ai:-p0rtAccess pi~n called for in the Advisory Circular. The Airport •• Acces~ Plar sinplv shows the various routes an~ streets provid.i

no access tc the Airport, ~his date? 'vJiII h;:: incorporatea into tr,E' Airport: Layout Plan. The Height Limit Plan shows the FAR Part 7: .irna cLnar-: sur~aces sup~:-inp~~e~over a vici~ity map. These fur:aces include::

o Transitional Surf~ces o Approach Surfaces G Horizontal Surface o Conical Surfacp-s r~ch 

## 0: these ~a!" its ow~ ur.iqueslope and controls the hei9~t tc ~hich object~ nav bs huilt without irnparing t~p op~ratia~al safety of the Airport. It is this ~Tawins ~hich i~ frequentlv incorporated intc rnunicipaJ crdinancp-sgoverning the height of structures in the vicin~t" of the airport.

~~iE part of the master plan provides inforMation essential to the inple~entation of the plan. Data on the phasing of improvements, the revenu~ and expenses that can be expected, the capital improvement costs, etc., are developed. Recommendations on the various rates, fees, and charges will be prepared, and various finapcing rnethoc.s will be discussed.:ask 11
- Sch~~ule o~ ProDosed D~veloorne~t

?hir t?sk ~ill pre~are a schedule showing the aD~=oxi

# I' matE yea!"i:1which verious .improvernerrt s should b~ conpleted. T~~~ sche~vlc ~ill take into consi~P!"~ti0:1the t~=C')'et

vear

## 0: :;(,15 a:1CaLlow sufficierrttine to reasonabLy ariortize an" Lnvestrnerrt smade en t!-:e l,jrpcrt.

~~r v~ri0u~ i~provG~e~ts conte~plated for the Santa !;c~:'::':-r-.Airpo:-t\;iJlhe evaLuated, and orGpr-o:-magnituce cost estimates will be mac~. 7h€sEcost esti~ates will be focused on the a~i~ti0~ portion o~ the property, si~ce the ultiMate developMent and costs ?,s!"ociatec. ":ith improvement o~ the nonavIatior, ~!"~n~rtywill be thp responsibility 

## 0: the o:-cf.:.izr:!tioc:

(s) undertat.ine that c1e':elopT:1ent. 1,11 cost P.~·::'!'la-:.es ,\'i:~be in terr;s0:: 1983 doLlare,

?h~s tas~ has b~en su~~i"ided into three eleMe~ts.

Elener.~1. Rate Structure Methodology. There are !"everalways to establish the various rates, fees, ane cha!"geson an airport. These will be discussed and a recommendation made on the methodology which seems most appropriate for Santa Monica Airport. To SOMe degree, this delves into the philosophy behind certain methodologies and why t.hey mayor may not be appropriate for this situation.r~e~e~t 2. Estinate Revenues. An estimate will be mc~~ 

## 0: all the revenu~s that can be generated o~ the aviation part of the field. This 

## I'

~ necessaril~ rentlires that the variou~ rates, fees, a~~ charges at other Southern Cal~fornia air~0rts h~ a5semble( ~or cornp~rativepurposes, and B?propriate rates, fees, and charges established ~0T Santa Monica Airp0rt. Revenues fro~ other (nonaviation) sources will be estimated based on t~0 best data available. Where contractR or c~Tee~e~ts establish rates, fees, or chars,-;.into tte future, thesA wi:: be used under the n~sur~tion ttet no chang~~ will be negotiRte~. Ele~ent 3. Estimate Costs. The cost to operat~ ane maintain the airport \lillbe estimated. These costs will he base0 on historical eata, or hest estimates fro~ comparable f2cilities, if necesA!tpr all the estin~tes ha~e been made, the net result ~i:l be given in tabular form so that the City will ha~e a lO-"ear projection available.

7his task will discuss the various ways that the i~~rovements to the Airport can be financed. AMong those that are typically considered are:

o Federel aid o State aid o Airport-generated revenues o Loans from the City o Development by private enterpriserp~n co~~lction of the last tasks, the final report will b~

prer~~ed in draft for~. It is typical at this point that th~ th~rc, and finnl, public neeting be heIr.to present the co~r!e~e Airoort develornent progra~ to the public. Co~- ~en~s c~fered bv t~0 nuhlic which are felt to ~ave S0~0 ~~rit, or could im~0c~ o~ the oDer?tion 

## 0: the Airport, are t"~ic~ll\' LncLuded in an ac:denduT:" or appendix to the report S0 tha,:thp."can be considered when detailer engineering or arc~itectur?l ~ork is undertaken. ':"':;:'s S'::r:"T"'" 

### 0: l}crr: ~o:!.loh·s the outline established by t.hrFiJ:. ':'r:(' :ssu~s a:-,c coricerns discussed in the narrative "E:o

### r >:: 

### 0: \;orr:"

preser-tcc' tel the City Council on Decer.,:;'2~-

1~, 1982, \-:ill

be addressed in this stuc::program. And tc that end, the "Scope of Work" is incorporated into ttis Task Or~er bv referc:,ce.

t.cr':0::' t:-I':'S

project \·.-i1: corrnerice after hoth parties have siqnc~ th~s Task Or~~r No. I aT"c shall procee~ for about ~in~ (S) ~onths nt ~hich ti~c the drawings ane letter re~nrts shall be delivered to the CLIENT~ unless it is nutu=l~y eqreed that the tine of ccmpletion shall be

~h~ f:'r~tpublic neeting, following Tasy. 4, shall be held prior to ray 1, 1983. The second public meeting, following C1.1Lfl-lL~f- ISTask 6, shall be held prior to

### JUIY ~, 1983. The third public meEtina, fol1o~ina Task 14, shall be held prior to ~, 1~83. In th; event circumstances beyond control of CONSULTAIJT indicate that one or more of these meeting dates cannot be met, Cm;SULTA!JT shall request, in writing, arevised date for the n~eting(s) and shall indicate why the

reGUGst i£ ne:cessar\'. D. The F~~ for this p~o~ect shall be a time anc materials fee with a n0t-to-excee~ linit in accordance with Article 2, Sectio:1p.. of the AGREE~':!:!~'::'. ';helabor rates shall he the currerrt Lebor retes published by CONSVL':'Af·J';, and the total ~e0 ~0~ this PRO~~C7 shall not exceed 560,000 unless it is ~ut~~ll~' ~q~eed that another F~E is appropriate as evidenced by an ;~'r:!::)::!:::'::"to this Tas}:Order No.1. ':'he current labor rates are appendr-d to the AGREE:!·1L:17':' anr; to th~s ~ASK ORD~R. 

### r. P.r:POR':'S 

### Arm DRAt';I!~GS ~he end procucts fo~ PHASE:I shall he a letter report ccve~in9 the material developed in this Phase, plus three (3) full sizo copies of the drav.inos in Tas}:6 "Concept Alt.ernatives." The ene products for PEASE II ~lil:be awritten report covRring all the tODic~ discu~sed in the tasks above (and as di~rU~E'~d in the "Sc'Joeof H()rk"presented to the City Council). The report will contain reduced-size copies of the draw~ngs prepared during the course of the studv. In afcition, three (3) full-size copies of each of the drawings ~ill be furnished to the City, plus five (5) copies for use by the FAA. Forty (40). copies of tl1ereport wi11 be furnished to CLIENT.F. J.1r:r::ITJGS

D~Y"':r.g

the course of this studv, C0!1SULT11rJ".:'will conduct w0rkin~lpeetings approximately once monthl~' for the purpose o~ bringing inteY"e~te~parties up to date, 0.iscussing issues c;::c corrcep ts, making recommendations, etc. C!"'IE~:':' \ViIIbe vrespo~sible for na~ing the persons to attend these \Vorking neetincs, and cor;Sl:L'I'AHT \-lill Mail notices to these narned persons in advance of each working meeting. CLIEr:,:, may, if it ~o d~sires, ope~ these working meetings to puhlic attendRj1re~h~~ever, public participation in working meetings is

Three (3) open public meetings will be coriduct.e d by Cm;SULTA~~ i~ a place to be provided by CLIENT. These public ~e~~ings ~ill be for the purpose of presenting to the ~eneral public such data and/or drawing~ as have been d~~e!npec to that time, and to provide the general puhlic an c~rortu~it~· to co~~ent on the data a~flor drawing~ and co~ce?~s. ':'hi~ is not an adversary proceeding, and debate on the pro9raM is not included or encouraged.n: \;rTm:SS \~p.rFTOF, thc C!,IE!":':'and the CO!]SU:"'!'A~7':'hereto II have nade a:1Cexecuted this Tasy. Order No. 1 t(j th~ PP0fTS-

•• SrO!;;.L SER\'JCrS ,h(~P.::~!~E~:':'the dav and vear first. b"21c'.1

C:\~IF()R~:r!'

," By._ .- 

# ---_...:...-_-~--.;.-:.---- .>~:." "-- c' Bv -:



### -------------- ,/

-J, Title

'\ D2.-::e~.p••.. i-'~:...L.'__. _'__~.-J,--'---=----- j 

## 1'1I'if3 I 

### , - I Date

LAPr/J0SCJ-fI:DUL1: A
F~~lo'·ee CIassification and Rate Schec5ule

Classification Rate Per Hour 95.75 84.75 72.25 64.50 57.75 50.50 45.50 41.50 I:S E4 £3 £2 El 53.50 45.50 39.50 33.25 28.75 '1'3 ~l Clerical 16.00 \':0rc Processing 25.50