alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### IN THE MATTER OF LILLIAN DEL GOBBO VINCE, CHARGED WITH CRIMINAL CONTEMPT.

*Mr. T. Girard Wharton*for the petitioner.

*Mr. John V. R. Strong*for the respondent.

March 7, 1949.

Granted.
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 12 December 2006         

adjusting the weightings applicable from 1 February, 1 March, 1 April, 1 May and 1 June 2006 to the remuneration of officials, temporary staff and contract staff of the European Communities serving in third countries

(2006/922/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities and the conditions of employment of other servants of the Communities laid down by Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2104/2005 (2), and in particular the second paragraph of Article 13 of Annex X thereto,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

With effect from 1 February, 1 March, 1 April, 1 May and 1 June 2006 the weightings applied to the remuneration of officials, temporary staff and contract staff of the European Communities serving in third countries, payable in the currency of the country of employment, shall be those set out in the Annex hereto.

The exchange rates used for the calculation of this remuneration shall be established in accordance with the rules for the implementation of the Financial Regulation and correspond to the dates referred to in the first paragraph.

Done at Brussels, 12 December 2006.

For the Commission

Benita FERRERO-WALDNER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 337, 22.12.2005, p. 7.

(3)OJ L 59, 1.3.2006, p. 1.

----

ANNEX

----
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 02, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 02, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18A0260. JESUS RAMIREZ et al. v. THERESA LYNN DALE.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
### Adams, Kevin (OST) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Richard M. Smylie <rsmyliell@hotmail.com> Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:42 PM Adams, Kevin (OST); Devany, Dennis (OST) richard@makanikai.com Makani Kai Aviation support Dear MrAdams and Mr. DeVany ·-
-

As a frequent visitorto the Kamuela area, Ifully supportthe Makani Kai Aviations' proposal to provide service tothis area. These flights will have asignificant impact on local residents and visitors, who would prefer direct service tothis area without havingtotransit via Kailua-Kana. It will save time and moneyfor all concerned. The proposed schedule offered by Richard Schuman is beneficial to both travelers from Honolulu and Kamuela. We all knowthat Schuman family has been a leader in transportation in Hawaii over over a 100years. Richard Schuman's experience and reputation in the aviation industry is outstanding and his devotion to customer service makes him a leader in the industry. The Schuman name reflects integrity and honesty. I sincerely hopethatyou will grant Makani Kai Aviation this contract and continuethe familytradition ofservice everyone in Hawaii. Ifyou have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Richard M. Smylie Hawaii Kai.

1
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1563-E1564]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           IN HONOR OF THE RETIREMENT OF DR. MARCIA GOLDSTONE

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. ANDRE CARSON

                               of indiana

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 19, 2012

  Mr. CARSON of Indiana. Mr. Speaker, today I rise to express my 
gratitude to Dr. Marcia Goldstone for her considerable achievements 
over the past 35-years with the Jewish Community Relations Council. Her 
vision, leadership and tireless devotion to promoting social justice 
and interfaith dialogue has strengthened and enriched the 71h District 
of Indiana in countless ways.
  As the long-serving Executive Director of the JCRC, Dr. Goldstone 
created and led dozens of issue-based coalitions made up of exemplary 
business and religious leaders, educators, and philanthropists to 
foster a welcoming and secure environment for our growing Jewish 
community. I applaud the JCRC for its embrace of the ancient tradition 
of tzedakah, the Hebrew word for charity, by assisting Jewish families 
who have fallen on hard times, assisting Soviet Jewry to integrate into 
American society, and promoting a deeper understanding amongst peoples 
of faith throughout Central Indiana.
  Dr. Goldstone's influence and passion for fighting injustice and 
promoting tolerance extends beyond Central Indiana. Her persistent 
efforts as part of a broad coalition of religious and secular 
organizations encouraged the Reagan Administration and Congressional 
leaders to call for the end of Apartheid in South Africa and release of 
Nelson Mandela. These efforts have earned her numerous

[[Page E1564]]

awards and accolades, including the prestigious Sagamore of the Wabash.
  Today, I ask my colleagues to join me in congratulating Dr. Marcia 
Goldstone for her outstanding service to the City of Indianapolis. Her 
retirement from the JCRC closes a chapter on an impressive career. She 
has been an extraordinary friend and adviser both to me and to my 
grandmother, the late Congresswoman Julia Carson. I wish her the very 
best and look forward to working with the JCRC of Indianapolis for many 
years to come.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,206,732
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  145,788
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,476,474
<PP&E>                                       8,413,921
<DEPRECIATION>                                  90,976
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,152,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          704,020
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,366,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,152,613
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               382,593
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,416,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,005,231)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,005,231)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,005,231)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
        

</TABLE>
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1577

To authorize appropriations for the National Historical Publications and

Records Commission for fiscal years 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 27 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 23), 1996

Mr. HATFIELD (for himself and Mr. SARBANES) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

FEBRUARY 29 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 28), 1996

Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the National Historical Publications and Records Commission for fiscal years 1998,

1999, 2000, and 2001.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR

4 THE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PUBLICATIONS

5 AND RECORDS COMMISSION.

6 Section 2504(f)(1) of title 44, United States Code,

7 is amended—
2

•S 1577 RCS

1 (1) in subparagraph (F) by striking out ‘‘and’’

2 after the semicolon;

3 (2) in subparagraph (G) by striking out the pe4 riod and inserting in lieu thereof a semicolon; and

5 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub6 paragraphs:

7 ‘‘(H) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1998;

8 ‘‘(I) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1999;

9 ‘‘(J) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2000; and

10 ‘‘(K) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2001.’’.

Æ
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, 

v.

MICHAEL JENSEN, Petitioner. 

No. 1 CA-CR 20-0582 PRPC 

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2004-020949-001 

The Honorable Howard D. Sukenic, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Michael Jensen, Florence

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge David B. Gass, Judge Michael J. Brown, and Judge David 

D. Weinzweig delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 7-29-2021
STATE v. JENSEN

Decision of the Court

2

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Michael Jensen seeks review of the superior court’s 

order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is petitioner’s fifth 

petition. 

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is 

petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by 

denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 

537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of 

establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion. 

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
**EXHIBIT 31.02****CERTIFICATION**I, Gregory T. Donovan, Senior Vice President of Accounting and Finance of Campbell & Company, Inc.,the general partner of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P. (the “Fund”), do hereby certifythat:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Fund; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations, cash flows and financial highlights of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.By: /s/ Gregory T. Donovan
Exhibit 10.35
                                      Suburban Lodges, Inc.

An assignment of franchise agreements and franchisor's consent and subordination
of franchise  agreement in favor of Finova with  substantially the same terms as
Exhibit  10.27 to the  Company's  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999 for the following group of properties is not being  separately
filed:

     PROPERTY NAME                       ADDRESS                  CITY, STATE

Group 6

Suburban Lodge - Hazlewood            9067 Dunn Road            Hazelwood, MO
Suburban Lodge - St. Charles          1769 Fairlane Dr.         St. Charles, MO
Suburban Lodge - East Indianapolis    2301 Post Dr.             Indianapolis, IN
Suburban Lodge - Newport News         12015 Jefferson Ave.      Newport News, VA
Suburban Lodge - Jackson, Miss.       5731 I-55 N               Jackson, MS
Exhibit 32.3








Certification of Executive Vice President and Principal Financial/Accounting Officer








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Annual Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

















Date:  March 29, 2012








/s/ Margaret Stapleton


Margaret Stapleton


Executive Vice President and Principal Financial/Accoutning Officer
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the first amendment to the Annual Report of Elbit Vision Systems Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yaron Menashe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Yaron MenasheYaron MenasheAugust 8, 2013
Chief Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7755 JOHN A. HAYNES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-2696-3-6BC) Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 5, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John A. Haynes, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Haynes v. South Carolina , No. CA-96-2696-3-6BC (D.S.C. Nov. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

(Filed: August 26, 2016) 

No. 13-968V 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * 

JABARI WALKER *

 * 

 *

Petitioner, * Decision on Joint Stipulation;

 * Human Papilloma Virus (“HPV”) 

v. * Vaccine; Muscle Damage

 * 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Howard Gold, Gold Law Firm, LLC, Wellesley Hills, MA, for petitioner. 

Gordon Shemin, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Roth, Special Master: 

 On December 9, 2013, Josita Walker filed a petition for compensation on behalf of her 

then-minor child, Jabari Walker, under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2

Jabari Walker [“Mr. Walker” or “petitioner”] was substituted as petitioner on July 30, 2015. 

Petitioner alleges that he developed muscle damage as a result of receiving a human papilloma 

virus (“HPV”) vaccination on or about November, 27, 2012. See Stipulation, filed August 25, 

2016, at ¶¶ 1. Respondent denies that the HPV immunization caused petitioner’s alleged injury.

Stipulation at ¶ 2. 

 

1

 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post this 

decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 

Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In 

accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other 

information, that satisfies the criteria in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule 

requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I agree that the 

identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, I will delete such material from public access. 

2

 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of 

citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
2

 Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On August 25, 2016, the parties 

filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms. 

 

Respondent agrees to issue the following payment: 

A lump sum of $20,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Jabari 

Walker. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be 

available under § 300aa-15(a). 

 I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount 

and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in 

accordance with this decision.3

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth 

 Mindy Michaels Roth 

 Special Master 

 

 

3

 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the 

right to seek review.