alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Stanley A. CONAWAY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 03-3069.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 8, 2003.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
                       [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG BRAUDE BAVLY]


We have issued our reports dated September 30, 1997 and December 31, 1996,
accompanying the financial statements of each of Jolly Alon Limited, Banca de
export-Import, and Exim Asint S.A., each, a Moldovian corporation, contained in
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the "10-KSB") for Trimol Group, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "company") for its fiscal year ended December 31,
1997. We consent to the use of the aforementioned reports in the 10-KSB and to
the use of our name as it appears therein.


                                           /s/ KPMG BRAUDE BAVLY          
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Tel Aviv, Israel
                                           April 15, 1998
October 11, 2012 

Ex Parte Communications with Mark Medenwaldt, Caterpillar Global Mining LLC 

Mr. Medenwaldt inquired, by emails on August 7 and 8, 2012, whether the proposed energy 

conservation standards rulemaking would affect above ground mobile mining equipment that 

would have distribution transformers onboard. In response, I sent to him, on August 9 and 14, 

2012, the web links to the DOE web page for distribution transformers and referred him to 

regulations.gov for other comments thus far received about mining equipment. 

James Raba 

Appliances & Commercial Equipment Standards 

Building Technologies Program 

Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Telephone: (202) 586-8654
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of microHelix, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tyram
H. Pettit, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Tyram H. Pettit
-----------------------------------
Tyram H. Pettit
President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director
November 6, 2003




                                       20
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Scott H. Ray, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Online, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the Registrant and we have:



5.     The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's
auditors and to the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: May 12, 2008 |  | /s/SCOTT H. RAYScott H. Ray Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 23.3**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 33-85896) and Form S-8 (File No.33-78592, File No. 333-69913, File No. 333-79445, File No. 333-37912, File No. 333-79503, File No. 333-62078 and File No. 333-76488) of D&E Communications, Inc. of our report dated March 11, 2004, on our audits of the consolidated financialstatements of Pilicka Telefonia Sp. z o.o. which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers Sp. z o.o. 

 

Warsaw, Poland 

March 11, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARC ANDREW BARGER, SR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 131 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of September, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
NO. 07-07-0256-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	SEPTEMBER 28, 2007

		______________________________

	AUCENCIO CASTRO ALVAREZ, APPELLANT

	V.

	CYNDIA ANN ALVAREZ, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 46TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILBARGER COUNTY;

	NO. 23,819; HONORABLE DAN MIKE BIRD, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

	ON MOTION TO DISMISS

	Aucencio Castro Alvarez, appellant, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because a Motion for New Trial was granted by the trial court.  No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).   All costs of this appeal are assessed to the appellant.  No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

							Mackey K. Hancock

						                   Justice
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1653

To prohibit imports into the United States of grain and grain products

from Canada, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 28, 1996

Mr. CONRAD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To prohibit imports into the United States of grain and

grain products from Canada, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress makes the following findings:

5 (1) The Canadian Government has imposed a

6 ban on the importation of durum wheat from the

7 United States because of an outbreak of karnal bunt

8 in Arizona.

9 (2) The ban applies to all imports of durum

10 wheat from the United States, including wheat from
2

•S 1653 IS

1 States where no evidence of karnal bunt has been

2 found.

3 (3) No karnal bunt has been found in any

4 wheat produced in Montana, North Dakota, South

5 Dakota, Minnesota, or in the Great Lakes region.

6 (4) The Canadian Government has stated that

7 due to the cold climate in Canada there is no risk

8 of an outbreak of karnal bunt in Canada.

9 (5) Canada’s ban on shipments of durum wheat

10 through the Great Lakes ports is unjustifiable and

11 the ban places unnecessary restrictions on shipments

12 of other wheat through the Great Lakes ports.

13 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST ENTRY OF CERTAIN CANA14 DIAN GRAIN PRODUCTS.

15 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 15 days after the

16 date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall pro17 hibit the entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for con18 sumption, of all grain products (described in heading 1001

19 or 1101.00.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

20 United States) which are produced, grown, or manufac21 tured in Canada.

22 (b) DURATION.—The prohibition imposed under sub23 section (a) shall remain in full force and effect until the

24 Secretary of Agriculture and the United States Trade

25 Representative—
3

•S 1653 IS

1 (1) determine that Canada has removed the

2 prohibition on imports described in subsection (c),

3 and that durum wheat products produced in the

4 United States are permitted full and fair access to

5 the markets of such country; and

6 (2) submit to the Congress the determination

7 under paragraph (1), together with the reasons un8 derlying the determination.

9 (c) PROHIBITION DESCRIBED.—The prohibition de10 scribed in this subsection is a prohibition on the importa11 tion of durum wheat products produced in the United

12 States where there is not sufficient evidence that karnal

13 bunt exists with respect to such wheat.

Æ
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Elbit Vision Systems Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sam Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




July14,2011
/S/ Sam Cohen

Sam Cohen

Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael E. GAUDIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-30334.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided Sept. 16, 1993.

Before:. WALLACE, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 175 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-167, CP2024-173.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-00936 Filed 1-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-7372.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 8, 1994.

*911Jose Luis Martinez, pro se.

Paula Offenhauser, Katherine L. Haden, Asst. U.S. Attys., and Gaynelle Griffin Jones, U.S. Atty., Houston, TX, for plaintiff-appel-lee.

Before SMITH and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges, and WALTER,* District Judge.

*

 District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Jose Martinez appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to change the post-imprisonment portion of his sentence from a special parole term to supervised release. Finding no error, we affirm.

I.

Martinez pleaded guilty in April 1988 to possession with intent to distribute approximately fifteen kilograms of marihuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(D). He received a sentence of four years’ confinement, a four-year special parole term, and a special assessment of $50.

In February 1993, following his release from prison, Martinez’s supervising probation officer issued a probable cause warrant for Martinez’s arrest based upon a belief that Martinez had violated his parole. Martinez surrendered and was imprisoned in March 1993 for violating parole.

Martinez moved to correct his sentence, arguing that he should have received a term of supervised release under § 1002 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 (“ADAA”), and *Gozlon-Peretz v. United States,*498 U.S. 395, 111 S.Ct. 840, 112 L.Ed.2d 919 (1991). The district court denied the motion as the statute under which Martinez was convicted, 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(D), was not governed by § 1002.

II.

Martinez argues that, under the reasoning of *Gozlon-Peretz,*§ 1002 designates offenses under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(D) as having supervised release. We review the motion to correct sentence under Fed. R.CRIM.P. 35 for gross abuse of discretion. *United States v. Hanyard,*762 F.2d 1226, 1228 (5th Cir.1985).

The issue in this case is not the effective date of § 1002, *see Gozlon-Peretz,*498 U.S. at 409, 111 S.Ct. at 849, but whether the offense in this case was designated as an offense requiring supervised release under § 1002. We conclude that it was not. Section 1002 redesignated § 841(b)(1)(C) as § 841(b)(1)(D) and amended § 841(b)(1)(A), (b)(1)(B), and (b)(1)(C) to reflect terms of supervised release instead of special parole. The special parole term in § 841(b)(1)(D) remained unaffected until November 1,1987, when it was amended by § 1004 of the ADAA. *Gozlon-Peretz,*498 U.S. at 406 n. 10, 111 S.Ct. at 847 n. 10. Since Martinez’s offense occurred in March 1987, the district court correctly denied his motion to replace his special parole term with a term of supervised release.

AFFIRMED.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 7
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 7
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 7
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 7
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 7
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 7
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 7
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mission Broadcasting,
Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
November
12, 2009





/s/ DAVID
      S. SMITHDavid
      S. Smith
              President
      and Treasurer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer and
              Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350
and is not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. The
foregoing certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
Exhibit 11
                                                
                              Novoste Corporation
                        Computation of Net Loss Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                         Year Ended December 31,
                                                            1996                     1995                    1994
                                                     --------------------    ---------------------    --------------------
<S>                                                  <C>                      <C>                     <C>      
Weighted average number of shares of common
stock outstanding during the year                              6,543,129                3,679,361               2,836,896

Effect of common stock issued and stock options
and warrants granted during the 12-month
period  preceding April 11, 1996                                 294,542                1,194,411               1,194,411

Elimination of duplicative effect of including
the same shares in both above amounts                           (89,179)                (202,625)                 -
                                                     --------------------    ---------------------    --------------------

Total common and common equivalent shares                      6,748,492                4,671,147               4,031,307
                                                     ====================    =====================    ====================

Net loss                                                     (5,939,081)              (3,218,026)             (2,195,689)
                                                     ====================    =====================    ====================
Net loss per share                                   $            (0.88)     $             (0.69)     $            (0.54)       
                                                     ====================    ====================     ====================

</TABLE>
##### 



$3,400,000.00
    
    Wisconsin
December 21, 2007
 Borrower Lender Note
   Maturity
Date
 Applicable Interest Rate
 Applicable
Interest Rate Initial Term Interest Rate First Option Term Interest Rate Second Option Term Interest Rate Initial Term Interest Rate First Option Term Interest Rate Second Option Term Interest Rate




---



##### 



Base Rate plus Prime Rate Bank
  30-Day LIBOR Rate
 LIBOR Determination Date
 2




---



##### 



LIBOR Banking Days
 LIBOR Reserve Percentage
 Interest Rate Adjustment Date
 Extension Options First Option Period Option
Requirements
   Second Option Period
 Application
 Late Charge Late Charge
 3




---



##### 



Security; Defined Terms; Incorporation by Reference Security Instrument Other Security Documents Debt Business Day
 Prepayment
 Default Event of Default
    Acceleration
 Default Interest; LIBOR Breakage Fee Default Rate
 4




---



##### 



provided however Prime Rate Default Rate Calculation Date LIBOR Breakage Fees
 Attorney Fees
 Limit of Validity Maximum
Rate
 5




---



##### 



No Oral Amendments
 Assignment
 Applicable Law; Jurisdiction
 Joint and Several Liability
 Waiver of Presentment, Etc
 No Waiver
 Notices
 Lender:
    
    PNC Bank, National Association
10851 Mastin, Suite 300
Overland Park, Kansas 66210
Attention: Closing DepartmentBorrower:
    
    NNN Eastern Wisconsin Medical Portfolio, LLC
1551 N. Tustin Avenue, Suite 300
Santa Ana, California 92705
Attention: Theresa Hutton
 6




---



##### 



Severability
 Time of the Essence
 Additional Terms and Provisions
 Main Note
    7




---



##### 



BORROWER:NNN EASTERN WISCONSIN MEDICALPORTFOLIO, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    
    Triple Net Properties, LLC,
a Virginia limited liability company,
its ManagerBy:
    
    /s/ Jeffrey T. HansonName:
    
    Jeffrey T. HansonTitle:
    
    Chief Investment OfficerTaxpayer ID No. 26-1461325
 8




---



##### 



STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF
    
    )
) ss.
)
 
  Signature(this area for official notarial seal)
 9




---



##### 



PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBy:Jeannette Butler, Vice President
 10
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5123 

To abolish the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division in the Office 

of Civil Rights of the Department of Health and Human Services, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2018 

Ms. MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico (for herself and Mr. CRIST) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To abolish the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division 

in the Office of Civil Rights of the Department of Health 

and Human Services, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eliminating the HHS 

5 Discrimination Division Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ABOLISHMENT OF CONSCIENCE AND RELIGIOUS 

7 FREEDOM DIVISION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Effective on the date that is 30 

9 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the ConVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:19 Mar 02, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5123.IH H5123

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5123 IH

1 science and Religious Freedom Division in the Office of 

2 Civil Rights of the Department of Health and Human 

3 Services is abolished. 

4 (b) NO SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR DIVISION.—No 

5 Federal funds may be used to establish or operate any 

6 substantially similar division, agency, or office with re7 spect to the programs and activities of the Department 

8 of Health and Human Services. 

9 (c) TRANSITION.—Before the effective date specified 

10 in subsection (a), the Secretary of Health and Human 

11 Services shall take such actions as may be necessary to 

12 transfer the assets, personnel, and liabilities of the Con13 science and Religious Freedom Division to other agencies 

14 and offices of the Department of Health and Human Serv15 ices. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS