alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Toy Burtron MADDEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-7823.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 30, 2003.

Decided Feb. 5, 2003.

Toy Burtron Madden, Appellant Pro Se. Joyce Kallam McDonald, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Toy Burtron Madden seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition for mandamus relief, which the district court construed as a successive motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2255 motion solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the mov-ant can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’ ” *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000)), *cert. denied,*534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Madden has not made the requisite showing. *See United States v. Madden,*Nos. CR-94M40-JFM; CA-02-3415-JFM (D.Md. Oct. 28, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00548-CR

ANTHONY LEXINGTON KOPYCINSKI

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

149th District Court of Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 85949-CR

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 26, 2022
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 33-85896) and Forms S-8 (File No. 33-78592, File No. 333-69913, File No. 333-79445, File No. 333-37912, File No. 333-79503, File No. 333-62078 and File
No. 333-76488) of D&E Communications, Inc. of our report dated March 10, 2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|                              
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania    
|March 10, 2006
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350

     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 of Lincoln Benefit Life
Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Lincoln
Benefit Life Company.


Date:  March 13, 2006

                                                      /s/ Casey J. Sylla
                                                      ------------------
                                                      Casey J. Sylla
                                                      Chairman of the Board and
                                                      President

                                                      /s/ John C. Pintozzi
                                                      --------------------
                                                      John C. Pintozzi
                                                      Senior Vice President and
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
#### Marjorie J. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Jan McCLURG; Paul Viner; Brad Musal; Scott County Soil & Water Conservation; Iowa Department of Agriculture, Appellee.

No. 02-3170.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 30, 2003.

Decided Jan. 31, 2003.

Before BYE, FAGG, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Marjorie J. Johnson appeals the district court’s * dismissal of her complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district court correctly dismissed the complaint for failing to state a claim. Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B. We also decline to consolidate this appeal with another of Johnson’s appeals, No. 02-3865.

A true copy.

*

 The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



#####
# United States Court of Appeals **For the First Circuit**

No. 99-2352 IN RE: CARL E. BAYLIS, Debtor, CONSTANCE B. RUTANEN; ELLA QUEVILLON, BY AND FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT

S. QUEVILLON; THERESA J. ALEXANDER,

Plaintiffs, Appellees,

v. CARL E. BAYLIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE ANTONIA QUEVILLON TRUST, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Nathaniel M. Gorton, U.S. District Judge ] ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on July 6, 2000, is amended as follows: Page 5, line 15: “fulfilling” should be replaced with “breaching”.
exhibit1064.htm







 



Exhibit 10.64




 


DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 







 


 







 


 


$250,000                                                                           Date:  September 23, 2011


 


 







 


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Warren Breslow, the sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars and no/100 ($250,000.00), together with interest of 10% per annum on the unpaid balance.


 


 


The entire principal and any accrued interest shall be fully and immediately payable UPON DEMAND of any holder thereof.


 


 







 


 


 

 


 


 


”Borrower”


 


Aura Systems, Inc.

















____________________


Melvin Gagerman


Chief Executive Officer







 


Dated: September 23, 2011
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 33-85896) and Forms S-8 (File No. 33-78592, File No. 333-69913, File No. 333-79445, File No. 333-37912, File No. 333-79503, File No. 333-62078 and File No. 333-76488) of D&E
Communications, Inc. of our report dated January 25, 2005, except for Note 5, for which the date is March 1, 2005, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of EuroTel LLC which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Kiesling Associates LLP
|                           
|Colorado Springs, Colorado 
|March 10, 2006
```

[Federal Register: April 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 72)]
[Notices]
[Page 19664-19665]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15ap10-77]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Arts Advisory Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that four meetings
of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts will be
held at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20506 as follows (ending times are approximate):
    AccessAbility (application review): May 6, 2010 by teleconference.
This meeting, from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. EDT, will be closed.
    AccessAbility (application review): May 11, 2010 by teleconference.
This meeting, from 2 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. EDT, will be closed.
    Literature (application review): May 19-20, 2010 in Room 714. A
portion of this meeting, from 12 p.m. to 12:30 p.m. on May 20th, will
be open to the public for policy discussion. The remainder of the
meeting, from 9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on May 19th and from 9 a.m. to 12
p.m. and from 12:30 p.m. to 4 p.m. on May 20th, will be closed.
    Literature (application review): May 21, 2010 in Room 714. This
meeting, from 9 a.m. to 5:15 p.m., will be closed.
    The closed portions of meetings are for the purpose of Panel
review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial
assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities
Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to
the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of
November 10, 2009, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant
to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory
panels that are open to the public, and if time allows, may be
permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion
of the panel chairman. If you need any accommodation due to a
disability, please contact the Office of AccessAbility, National
Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days
prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to these meetings can be
obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel
Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or
call 202/682-5691.


[[Page 19665]]


    Dated: April 12, 2010.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2010-8613 Filed 4-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**The Board of Directors
PMN Substance in Paint/Waxes/Cleaner Formulation Production

55 gallon container of 28 wt% PMN 

substance.

Pump PMN substance into 

10,000 gallon paint/wax/cleaner 

mixer

1, 5 or 55 gallon paint/wax/ 

cleaner containers with up to 

0.2% PMN substance (up to 

0.02% for wax/cleaner). 

10,000 gallon 

paint/wax/cleaner 

mixer to mix cleaner 

components and PMN 

substance

Release Point 1 – from 

clean-out of PMN 

substance container (0.08 

kg/batch if not recycled).

Release Point 2 – from cleanout of cleaner mixer (0.08 

kg/batch). Clean-out between 

batches not routine.

Up to 80 kg of PMN 

substance per batch of 

cleaner (up to 8 kg for 

wax/cleaner) 

Worker Activity A – Addition of PMN 

substance to 10,000 gallon mixing 

tank

Worker Activity B – Clean-out of 

PMN substance container.

Worker Activity C – Clean-out of 

mixing tank
OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

153) ll-K- (B) -152 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:53 AM Sheet 153 of 325 

P.1 
P.2 

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS, INC. j A _ O O m O 7 

1655 NORTH FORT MYER DRIVE ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22209 703/528-1900 ' # 1 \ J KJ tmm I 

I 

i i 

1 II-K-CEO-152 

i 

September 27, 1984 ; 

Mr. Robert Short 

Economic Analysis Branch 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Drop-12 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Subject: EPA Contract No. 68-02-3564, Work Assignment #19 

Dear Robert: 

Attached is a summary of total projected solid waste and liquid 

discharge disposal requirements from fifth round S02 NSPS analysis IFCAM 

runs. These values may be needed in the revised S0_ NSPS preamble. 

They were also requested in your meeting on September 26. 

Sincerely, 

Tim Hogan ^ 

TH/ce 

Enclosure 

cc: Dr. A. Wehe 

MANAGEMENT / ECONOMICS / ENGINEERING 
1990 IFCAM PROJECTIONS^ 

P.3 

Short waste 

(IO3 short tons) 

Liquid discharge 

(10 cubic meters) 

Reference Case fuel prices 

Regulatory baseline 

Option Case 50 

107 

130 

811 

4,318 

Higher oil and gas prices with 

NATH scrubbers 

Regulatory baseline 

Option Case 50d 

Option Case 90e 

1,354 

773 

718 

667 

5,584 

6,062 

Higher oil and gas prices with 

dual alkali scrubbers 

Option Case 50 

Option Case 90e 

1,040 

1,093 

0 

0 

aNew industrial fossil fuel-fired boilers installed after 1985 which are 

larger than 100 MMBtu/hr. Fifth round S02 NSPS analysis results. 

Includes coal boiler bottom ash, fly ash collected by particulate matter 

emissions control equipment and dual alkali FGD and lime spray drying FGD 

waste. 

'Sodium throwaway FGD waste. 

Minimum 50 

lb S02/MMBti 

percent S02 removal and 0.9 lb S02/MMBtu ceiling for coal; 0.3 

u ceiling for residual fuel oil. 

"Minimum 90 percent S02 removal and 0.6 lb S02/MMBtu ceiling for coal; 0.3 

lb S09/MMBtu ceiling Tor residual fuel oil.
### NUMBE RS 1 3 - 0 8 - 0 0 0 6 0 - CR & 1 3 - 0 8 - 0 0 0 6 1 - CR 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ ____________ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ________ ___ J A M E S P O R I S , A p p e l l a n t,
v . TH E S TA TE O F TE XA S, A ppel l ee.

____ ____________ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ________ ___ O n appeal f r om t he 34 7t h and 319 t h D i st r i ct C our t s

ofN ueces C oun t y, Texa s.

____ ____________ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ________ ___



## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON Be fo re Ju stice s R od rigu ez, Garza, a nd Ve la M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam App ellant , Jam es Poris, att em pts to app eal his con v ictions for agg rav ate d assa ult and es cape. The tr ial co urt has ce rt ified thateac h appea l “i s a pl ea- barg ain ca se, and the defend anthas NO rig ht of app eal.” See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25 .2(a)(2). On Jan uary 25, 200 8, th is Court notif ie d a ppe llant’s cou nsel of the trial court’s
cer ti ficat ion and ord ered counse l to: (1 ) rev iew the re cord; (2) determi ne w hether appel lan t2

has a rig ht to app eal; a nd (3) forw ard to th is Cou rt , byl etter , c ounse l’ s fin din g s a s t o w hether appel lan t has a r ig ht t o appea l, or , al ter n a ti vely, adv is e thi s C our t as to the
ex is tenc e of any

amended cer

ti ficat ion

. On A pr i l 4 , 20 08 , c ou ns el fi l ed a l ette r b r i ef w i th t hi s C ou rt. C ou ns el ’ s res po nse does not e sta bli sh that the cer ti ficat ion currentl y

on file w it h this Cour

t is in cor re ct or

that appel lan t ot her

w is e has a r ig ht t o appea l. The Tex as Rul es of A ppel lat e Procedu re prov ide that an appeal must be di smi ss ed if the trial court’s certif ication doe s not sho w thatthe d e fe n dan t has th e rig ht of app eal. T EX . R. A PP . P. 25. 2(d); see alsoT EX . R. A PP . P. 37 .1, 4 4.3 , 44. 4. Acco rdingly , the se appeal s a re D ISM ISSE D. An y pendi ng moti ons are deni ed as moot.

PERC UR IAM
Do not p ubl is h. Tex . R . Ap p. P . 47. 2( b) Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and filed thi s t he 12th day

of June, 2008.
Map Created: March 2013

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2010

Per Capita Market Income Rates in Appalachia, 2010

(County Rates)

Per capita market income is a measure of an area's total 

personal income, less transfer payments, divided by the resident 

population of the area. The map uses natural breaks in the 

distribution to organize the data into groups of common values. 

0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

$9,680 - $16,252

$16,253 - $20,392

$20,393 - $25,962

$25,963 - $37,216

Per Capita Market Income

U.S. average = $32,562

Appalachian average = $24,425

(Natural Breaks Classification)
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, James M. Mitchell, Chief Financial Officer of Family Home Health Services,
Inc. (the "registrant"), have executed this certification for furnishing to the
Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the filing with the
Commission of the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report"). I hereby certify that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant as of and for the end of that period.


August 15, 2005                                      /s/ James M. Mitchell
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     James M. Mitchell
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.2
 ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
 Agreement st Effective Date ( Assignor Assignee
 RECITALS
 Exhibit A Property
 Exhibit B
   AGREEMENT
  Assignment
 Assumption
 Indemnifications
 Counterparts




---



##### 



ASSIGNOR:
PULTE HOME CORPORATION, a Michigan
corporationBy:
    /s/ Scott PasternakName:
    Scott PasternakTitle:
    ATTORNEY-IN-FACTASSIGNEE:
SPT  SWRC, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability companyBy:Name:Title: 2




---



##### 



ASSIGNOR:
PULTE HOME CORPORATION, a Michigan
corporationBy:Name:Title: ASSIGNEE:
SPT  SWRC, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    /s/ William A. ShopoffName:
    By William A. Shopoff,Title:
    President and CEO of Shopoff Properties Trust,
Inc., a Maryland corporation, as Managing Member of
Shopoff General Partner, LLC, a
Delaware LLC, as General Partner
of Shopoff Partners, LP, a
Delaware LP as Managing Member of
SPT  SWRC, LLC 2




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 LEGAL DESCRIPTION
 A-1
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-38079, 333-49295, 333-49433, 333-60785, 333-61474, 333-62748,333-65735, 333-65793, 333-72681, 333-80735, 333-86797, and 333-85660) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-20329, 333-68520, 333-79623, and 333-97045) of Prentiss Properties Trust of our report dated March 10, 2004 relating to the financial statements andfinancial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

Dallas, Texas 

March 12, 2004
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his
capacity as an officer of Emmis Communications Corporation (the "Company"),
that, to his knowledge:

(1)      the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
         November 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  January 14, 2003


                                             /s/ WALTER Z. BERGER
                                             Walter Z. Berger
                                             Executive Vice President, Treasurer
                                             and Chief Financial Officer
[Cite as State v. Hinson, 2013-Ohio-776.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

BUTLER COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, : 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2012-06-121 

: D E C I S I O N

 - vs - 3/4/2013 

: 

 

JEROME HINSON, : 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. CR2012-02-0171 

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 315 

High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for plaintiff-appellee 

Charles M. Conliff, 5145 Pleasant Avenue, Suite 18, P.O. Box 18424, Fairfield, Ohio 45018-

0424, for defendant-appellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of 

the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the 

Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel, oral 

argument having been waived. 

{¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Jerome Hinson, has filed a brief with this court 
Butler CA2012-06-121

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that 

a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the 

trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be 

predicated; (2) lists thirteen potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders

at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to 

determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant 

on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief 

and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that 

it is wholly frivolous. 

HENDRICKSON, P.J., PIPER AND M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 March 11, 2008
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
 Ambassadors International, Inc.
  Delaware
    
    0-26420
    
    91-1688605(State or Other Jurisdiction of
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS EmployerIncorporation)
    
    
    
    Identification Number)
 1071 Camelback Street
Newport Beach, CA 92660
 (949) 759-5900
 N/A
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial ConditionItem 9.01 ExhibitsSIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXEXHIBIT 99.1EXHIBIT 99.2    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
    
 Item 9.01 Exhibits.
  
  2




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  AMBASSADORS INTERNATIONAL, INC.Date:  March 17, 2008
    By:
    /s/   Blake T. BarnettBlake T. BarnettChief Financial Officer 3




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press release dated March 11, 2008, issued by the Registrant99.2
    
    Transcript of the conference call held March 12, 2008
 4