T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2).

T he H onor abl e J e r e m yD . F oge l , U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJ udge f orthe ** * N orthe rn D i s tr i c tof

C a l i f orni a , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. R I GO B E R T O A R Z AT E - MI R AN DA , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 50043 D . C . N o. 3: 07 -C R -005 56 -D M S -1 ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia D a naM . S abr a w , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry10, 2010 ** P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia Be f o r e : THOM AS a n dSI LVER M AN , Ci r c u i tJ u d g e s , a n dFOGEL, D i stri ct *** Judg e. 

# FI LED FEB 12 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS- 2-

D ef endantappeal s the 92 -m on th p ri son sent ence the di stri ctcourti m po se d a f te raju ryf

o u n dh im g u iltyo f

u n la w f u l r e e n tryb yap r e v io u s lyr e m o v e da lie n , in v io la tio n o f

8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 ( a ) - ( b ) . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n p u r s u a n t to 2 8 U .S .C . § 1291 a nd 18 U . S . C . § 3742( a ) . F orthe f ol l ow i ng r e a s ons , w e a f f i rm , butr e m a nd to c o rr e c t th e ju d g m e n t. F ir s t, w e r e

je c t D e f e n d a n t’s a r g u m e n t th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt e rr o n e o u s ly f a i l e d t o gr a nthi m adow nw a r d de pa rtur e f orhi s purport e d a c c e pt a nc e of r e s pons i bi l i ty , pe rU . S . S . G . § 3E 1. 1( a ) . S e c t i on 3E 1. 1( a ) m a y , i n “ ra re s itu a tio n s ,” appl yw he r e ade f

e nda nt“ goe s t o tr i a l t o a s s e rta nd pr e s e rve i s s ue s tha tdo not r e l a t e t o fa c tu a l g u ilt

. . . . ” U . S . S . G . § 3 E 1. 1, cm t . 2 (em ph as i s a dd ed). H er e, d e s p ite c o n f

e s s in g h is c r im e s to o f

f ic ia ls a t th e b o r d e r , D e f e n d a n t p r o c e e d e dto tr ia l a n dc h a lle n g e dth e f a c tu a l b a s is o f

h is g u ilt, i . e. , hi s pr i orr e m ova l , by att em pt i ng t o d i sc re di tthe G ov ernm ent ’ s f ac tw i tness es . A cc ordi ng l y, the di stri ct c ourt ’ s f i ndi ng tha tD e f

e nda ntha d nottrul ya c c e pt e d r e s pons i bi l i tyf orpurpos e s of § 3E 1. 1( a ) w a s notc l e a r l ye rr one ous . S e e U ni t e d S t a t e s v. J ohns on, 581 F . 3d 994, 1001 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ; s e e a l s o U ni t e d S t a t e s v. W e i l a nd, 420 F . 3d 1062, 1067- 69, 1 0 8 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) ( f

in d in g § 3 E 1 .1 in ap p lic ab le w h e r e th e d e f e n d a n t r e p e a te d ly c h a lle n g e dth e a d m is s ib ilityo f d o c u m e n ts b e a r in g o n a n e s s e n tia l e le m e n t o f h is offe nse) .- 3-

S ec on d, w e r ej ec tD ef

endant ’ s c on t ent i on thatthe di stri ctcourtcom m i tt ed r e ve r s i bl e e rr orby“ f

a i l [ i ng] t o gi ve a nyi de nt i f i abl e c ons i de r a t i on t o the r e l e va nt gu i del i ne fa ct ors, appl i ca t i on s, or other pert i nentfa ct s i n thi s c as e. ” T he di stri ct courtpl ai nl y a ckno w l edged atthe begi nn i ng of the se nt enci ng hear i ng thati thad co n sid er ed all th e d o cu m en ts su b m ittedb y th e p ar ti es , i n clu d in g D ef en d an t’ s o b je c tio n s to th e P S R , w h ic h la ido u t a ll th e p e rtin e n t f a c ts a n dau th o r itie s o n th is i s s ue . T he r e c or d the r e f or e m a ke s c l e a rtha tthe di s tr i c tc ourt“ ha [ d] c ons i de r e d the part i es ’ ar gu m ent s and ha[d] a r ea soned b as i s f or exerc i si ng [i t s] ow n l egal deci si on m aki ng autho ri ty. ” R i t a v. U ni t ed S t at es , 55 1 U . S . 33 8, 35 6 (20 07 ); ac cord U ni t ed S t at es v. D ani el s, 54 1 F . 3d 91 5, 92 2 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). T h ir d , a s D e f

e n d a n t r ig h tlyc o n c e d e s , c ir c u it p r e c e d e n t f o r e c lo s e s h is a r gum e nt s r e ga r di ng the s c ope a nd c ont i nue d vi abi l i tyof A l m e nda r e z - T orr e s v. U n ite dS ta te s , 5 2 3 U .S . 2 2 4 ( 1 9 9 8 ) , a n dth e c o n s titu tio n a lityo f 8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 ( b ) . S ee U ni t ed S t at es v. G ar ci a- C ar denas, 55 5 F . 3d 10 49 , 10 51 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( per c u r ia m ) ( lis tin g c a s e s ) . A l tho ug h w e a ff

i rm the se nt ence , w e r em and the ca se t o the di stri ctcourt w ith in s tru c tio n s th a t it d e le te f r o m th e ju d g m e n t th e r e f e r e n c e to 8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 ( b ) . S e e id . ( r e m a n d in g s u as p o n te to d e le te th e r e f e r e n c e to § 1 3 2 6 ( b ) ( 2 ) ) .- 4-

W e d e c lin e to r e a c h th e is s u e s r a is e db yD e f e n d a n t’s s u p p le m e n ta l p r o s e m o tio n s . A F F IR M E D ; R E M A N D E D to corre ctth e j u d gm en t.