alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1



                                                                 EXHIBIT (23)(b)



The Board of Directors
Professionals Group Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-34359 and 333-34361) on Forms S-8 of Professionals Group, Inc. of our report
dated February 23, 1999, relating to the consolidated statements of operations,
comprehensive income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 1998, and the related financial statement schedules, which report
appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Professionals
Group, Inc.

The consolidated financial statements and related financial statement schedules
give retroactive effect to the merger of Professionals Group, Inc., and
Physicians Protective Trust Fund, on July 1, 1998, which has been accounted for
as a pooling of interests business combination.

/s/KPMG LLP

Detroit, Michigan
March 27, 2001
EXHIBIT 31.2
  CERTIFICATIONS
    Form 10-Q
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e)) Rules 13a-15(f) 15d-15(f))
                Joseph
    S. Tesoriero
   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Joshua Heston *v.*Clara Heston.

Petitioner for divorce wrote to his wife in another state, ashing her to meet hira at a certain place within the state, and, she complying, petitioner did not meet her, but the sheriff did, and served citation on her.-- *-Heta,*that the service should be set aside as fraudulent.

On motion to set aside service of citation.

*Mr. Samuel*Wallcer, *Jr.,*for the complainant.

*Mr. William Holt,*for the defendant.

Bird, V. C.

The motion in this case is to set aside the service of a citation because such service was procured by circumvention and fraud. *92The deféndant was living in Pennsylvania with her father-in-law, and the petitioner, having filed his petition for divorce, wrote her asking her to meet him at a certain place in the city of Trenton. She came into the state and attended at the place designated by the petitioner in his letter. The petitioner did not meet her, as was implied in his letter that he would, but the sheriff was there in attendance and served a process of citation and copy of the petition upon her. I think that when the process of the courts is procured to be served by such devices, it is always characterized as fraudulent and will not be recognized. I think that this should especially be the rule in courts of equity.

The motion will be granted, with costs.
Date: July 21 , 2015 M ee tin g : ENGS Meeting Rul e(s) Discussed: W ritt e n Materials? Yes/No: Na m e

,__ 

# _____ _ ---------------- O r ga ni z at i on Phone N umb e r 

### I <-__?;2 - 

### 3os - **s-~o** 

### 7 

## J

___ :,)_QZ. 

### "L!J~ 

## _1__!1C8 - -j 

### )_ - **3~"3** 

### ....



# _ **---~-·**

**2o '10~**  :J



# _z **__;** ZGL- 

## 2S7--03) (/; I 

# fr I

**-------~** 

# & L ----- ------'
I 

## l I I 

# -j
EXHIBIT 31.1
  CERTIFICATIONS
    Form 10-Q
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e)) Rules 13a-15(f) 15d-15(f))
                David
    A. DeLorenzo
   President and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



/s/ Gary L. DreherGary L. DreherChief Executive OfficerFebruary 22, 2008
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Walter Gould, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Sandra Elena Roper, J.), rendered April 11, 2018, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Sandra Elena Roper, J.), rendered April 11, 2018, affirmed.</p><p>The accusatory instrument was not jurisdictionally defective. It charged all the elements of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 265.01[2]). Defendant's intent to use the weapon, an imitation pistol, in an unlawful manner is reasonably inferred from allegations that defendant "pointed what appeared to be a firearm at [the victim] during a verbal altercation" (<a href="../2011/2011_09219.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Purvis, </i>90 AD3d 1339</a>, 1340 [2011], <i>lv denied</i> 18 NY3d 997 [2012]).</p><p>The factual allegations in the accusatory instrument were also sufficient to place defendant on notice that the imitation pistol recovered during the search of his home was the same one that he displayed during the altercation. Any further challenge by defendant to the connection between the weapons was a matter to be raised as a defense at trial, not by insistence that the accusatory instrument was jurisdictionally defective (<a href="../2004/2004_04789.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Konieczny</i>, 2 NY3d 569</a>, 577 [2004]). Any hearsay defect in the instrument was waived by defendant's guilty plea (<i>see People v Keizer</i>, 100 NY2d 114, 121-123 [2003]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: September 25, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
##### 



EXHIBIT 5.1
 Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth
 
  
 Re:
    
    Registration Statement on Form S-8  Amendment to 2005 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan
     Very truly yours,
STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON & RAUTH/s/ STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON & RAUTH
EXHIBIT 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
    OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
    DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
  Form 10-Q Form 10-Q)
  Form 10-Q
  Form 10-Q
  Joseph
    S. Tesoriero
   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 FOURTH AMENDMENT 
 TO 

THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION 
 2010 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 WHEREAS, The Progressive Corporation
2010 Equity Incentive Plan, as previously amended (the “Plan”), is currently in effect; and 
 WHEREAS, it is deemed
desirable to amend the Plan; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

1. Subject to Paragraph 2 below, the definition of the term “Performance Goals” as set forth in Section 1(b) of the Plan,
is hereby amended as follows: 
 a. The word “and” is hereby deleted from the last line of clause
(ii) of such definition. 
 b. Clause (iii) of such definition is hereby renumbered as clause (iv).

 c. A new clause (iii) is hereby inserted in such definition, as follows: 

“(iii) Investments: 
  

	 	•	 	 Investment performance of one or more segments of the Company’s investment portfolio; and” 



d. The text of such definition immediately following the newly renumbered clause (iv) is hereby deleted in its
entirety and the following is substituted in its place: 
 “Performance goals may be measured on a company-wide, subsidiary
or business unit basis, or any combination thereof. Performance goals may reflect absolute entity performance or a relative comparison of entity performance to the performance of a peer group of entities, an index, or other external measure. With
respect to investment performance, such goals may also reflect risk adjustment and/or the benefit of any state premium tax abatements attributable to the Company’s investment portfolio.” 

2. The addition of the new performance criterion included in Paragraph 1 above is subject to approval by the holders of The Progressive
Corporation’s Common Shares, $1.00 par value in accordance with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. If shareholders do not approve such new performance criterion at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in April
2012, this Amendment shall automatically terminate and be of no further force or effect. 
 This Amendment will be effective as
of January 27, 2012. 
  

			
		
		 	/s/ Charles E. Jarrett
		 	 Charles E. Jarrett

Secretary
Exhibit 12i



Certificate of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Atlas Pacific Ltd (the Company) for the financial year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), Joseph J.U. Taylor as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Report and result of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.



|/s/    JOSEPH J.U.
TAYLOR                      
|-----------------------------------------------
|Joseph James Uel Taylor Chief Executive Officer



July
15, 2003



This certificate accompanies this Report pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF QPQ CORPORATION FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1996,  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                438,731
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                         171,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                            57,718
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    1,077,060
<PP&E>                              2,627,591
<DEPRECIATION>                       (639,340)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      3,393,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 838,085
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                               76,535
<OTHER-SE>                          2,179,367
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        3,393,987
<SALES>                             2,093,145
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    2,093,145
<CGS>                               3,532,435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       3,532,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    1,390,848
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     36,844
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (2,866,982)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (2,866,982)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                       (2,866,982)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (.42)
        

</TABLE>
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 53 ) ll-K - (B ) -4 1 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:49AM Sheet 53 of 325P. 2 

# 'A \ Pl II-K-(B)-4 1
NE W SE T O F IFCA

M COAL PRICES , Lette r fro

m T . Hogan , EE

A t o R . Short , EPArSASD . Jul y 8 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-4 1
Exhibit 23

PARITZ & COMPANY, P.A.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We have issued our report dated March 17, 2003, except as to Note 3(b)
which is dated March 31, 2003, accompanying the financial statements of Trimol
Group, Inc. to be contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the "10-KSB")
for Trimol Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("the Company") for its fiscal
year ended December 31, 2002. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
reports in the 10-KSB and to the use of our name as it appears therein.


                                                   PARITZ & COMPANY,  P.A.
                                                   Certified Public Accountants
                                                   April 11, 2003


                                  40
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18E0060. GEMA FERNANDEZ v. RUKAYAT HARDEMAN.

Appellee’s Emergency Motion for Writ of Possession is hereby DENIED. We

note, however, that this motion should be pursued in the trial court in the first

instance. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

July 05, 2018

07/05/2018
ATTACHMENT VI Spectra
II

Calendar No. 440

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1577

[Report No. 104–283]

To authorize appropriations for the National Historical Publications and

Records Commission for fiscal years 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 27 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 23), 1996

Mr. HATFIELD (for himself and Mr. SARBANES) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

FEBRUARY 29 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 28), 1996

Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

JUNE 19, 1996

Reported by Mr. STEVENS, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the National Historical Publications and Records Commission for fiscal years 1998,

1999, 2000, and 2001.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1577 RS

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR

2 THE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PUBLICATIONS

3 AND RECORDS COMMISSION.

4 Section 2504(f)(1) of title 44, United States Code,

5 is amended—

6 (1) in subparagraph (F) by striking out ‘‘and’’

7 after the semicolon;

8 (2) in subparagraph (G) by striking out the pe9 riod and inserting in lieu thereof a semicolon; and

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub11 paragraphs:

12 ‘‘(H) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1998;

13 ‘‘(I) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1999;

14 ‘‘(J) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2000; and

15 ‘‘(K) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2001.’’.

Calendar No. 440

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1577

[Report No. 104–283]

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the National Hisfiscal years 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001. torical Publications and Records Commission for

JUNE 19, 1996

Reported without amendment
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1976/2006

of 20 December 2006         

amending Regulations (EC) No 2204/2002, (EC) No 70/2001 and (EC) No 68/2001 as regards the extension of the periods of application

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 994/98 of 7 May 1998 on the application of Articles 92 and 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community to certain categories of horizontal State aid (1), and in particular points (a)(i), (ii),(iv) and point (b) of Article 1(1) thereof,

Having published a draft of this Regulation,

After consulting the Advisory Committee on State Aid,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 11(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002, the second sentence is replaced by the following:

‘It shall apply until 30 June 2008’.

Article 2

In Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001, the second sentence is replaced by the following:

‘It shall apply until 30 June 2008’.

Article 3

In Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 68/2001, the second sentence is replaced by the following:

‘It shall apply until 30 June 2008’.

Article 4

The obligation to communicate summary information sheets on measures implemented, pursuant to Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 68/2001, Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 and Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 shall not apply to State aid measures prolonging existing measures pursuant to this Regulation, provided no substantive amendment is made to such measures and that summary information sheets were duly submitted on the implementation of such measures.

Article 5

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 2006.

For the Commission

Neelie KROES            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 142, 14.5.1998, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 337, 13.12.2002, p. 3. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1040/2006 (OJ L 187, 8.7.2006, p. 8).

(3)OJ L 10, 13.1.2001, p. 33. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1040/2006.

(4)OJ L 10, 13.1.2001, p. 20. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1040/2006.

(5)  COM(2005) 107 final.

(6)  COM(2005) 436 final.

----
EXHIBIT 10.33
 Mindspeed Technologies, Inc.
Summary of Director Compensation Arrangements
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald A. Burpee, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, motion granted and indictment dismissed. Memorandum: The police stopped defendant’s car based solely on an anonymous telephone tip that defendant possessed cocaine. Defendant was seized when the car was stopped *(see, People v Sobotker,*43 NY2d 559). In order to justify the stop, *586the police needed reasonable suspicion based on specific and articulable facts that defendant committed a crime *(see, People v Ingle,*36 NY2d 413, 418-420). The anonymous tip provided neither reasonable suspicion *(People v Sobotker, supra; People v La Pene,*40 NY2d 210, 222-224) nor probable cause *(see, People v Bigelow,*66 NY2d 417, 423-424) to justify the stop. To the extent that the decision in *Alabama v White*(496 US 325) may be interpreted to support a contrary result, it is clear that this decision and the totality of circumstances test of *Illinois v Gates*(462 US 213) upon which it relied, is unacceptable as a matter of State constitutional law *(see, People v Johnson,*66 NY2d 398, 406). Since the stop of defendant’s car was unlawful, the contraband seized must be suppressed *(see, Wong Sun v United States,*371 US 471). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS FOUND IN THE
COMPANY'S 10-K FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,886
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               573,798
<PP&E>                                           9,939
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 589,345
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          275,190
<BONDS>                                        175,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,101
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   589,345
<SALES>                                        148,404
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               189,345
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,714
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 92,018
<INCOME-TAX>                                    38,243
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             53,775
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,775
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.23


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank

Notice of an Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

# TIME AND DATE: 

Thursday, January 25, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. 

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via teleconference. 

# STATUS: 

The meeting will be open to public observation. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

1. Amendment of the Standard Operating Procedures Between EXIM and PEFCO

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Dana Jackson (202-329-2052;                         *dana.jackson@exim.gov*). Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting may do so via teleconference and must register using the link below by noon Wednesday January 24, 2024. After completing the registration, individuals will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.                    

*https://teams.microsoft.com/​registration/​PAFTuZHHMk2Zb1GDkIVFJw,qIj2KyO1UUm41WL18xw5VQ,jAoyB5Oho0CcCZLOc-dxhQ,s3XCRslm9U-_​_​KVPi_​WOjw,Gw-O3ZHuyUK9_​4f7BRBQ9w,SxnJJMYLGE-UYc1-y7Dk0g?​mode=​read&​tenantId=​b953013c-c791-4d32-996f-518390854527*.                    

Dated: January 19, 2024.

Kalesha Malloy,

IT Specialist.

[FR Doc. 2024-01318 Filed 1-19-24; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-P