alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 361/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 361 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4919 December 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 361

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4919 December 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1854/2006 of 15 December 2006 publishing, for 2007, the agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds introduced by Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1854/2006 of 15 December 2006 publishing, for 2007, the agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds introduced by Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<PAGE>

                [Letterhead of Web Interactive Services, Inc.]

                                                                      Exhibit 99

April 1, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Arthur Andersen LLP has represented to Webb Interactive Services, Inc. that its
audit was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting
and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was
conducted in compliance with professional standards and that there was
appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit, availability
of national office consultation and availability of personnel at foreign
affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

                                        Webb Interactive Services, Inc.

                                        By: /s/ William R. Cullen
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Its: CEO and CFO
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In
connection with the quarterly report of First National Energy Corporation
(the "Registrant"), on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date, I,
Peter Wanner, as Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.







Date:
      May 14, 2010By:
      /s/ Peter WannerPeter
      Wanner
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 21.1



|PARENT                               |  | SUBSIDIARIES                       |  | JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION
|------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|                                     |  |                                   
|Max Re Capital Ltd. (the Registrant) |  | Max Re Ltd.                        |  | Bermuda                     
|                                     |  |                                   
|                                     |  | Max Re Managers Ltd.               |  | Bermuda                     
|                                     |  |                                   
|Max Re Ltd.                          |  | Max Re Diversified Strategies Ltd. |  | Bermuda                     
|                                     |  |                                   
|                                     |  | Max Europe Holdings Limited        |  | Ireland                     
|                                     |  |                                   
|Max Europe Holdings Limited          |  | Max Re Europe Limited              |  | Ireland                     
|                                     |  |                                   
|                                     |  | Max Insurance Europe Limited       |  | Ireland
#### Maria Del CARMEN MENDEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Togo D. WEST, Jr., Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendant, Appellee.

No. 02-1223.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Feb. 13, 2003.

Maria Del Carmen Mendez on brief pro se.

H.S. Garcia, United States Attorney, Miguel A. Fernandez, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and Fidel A. Sevillano Del Rio, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellee.

Before CYR, Senior Circuit Judge, LYNCH and LIPEZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Maria Del Carmen Mendez, a nurse at a Veterans Administration health center in Puerto Rico, sued Togo D. West, Jr., the Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs, claiming employment discrimination based on a mental disability. The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and this appeal ensued. After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm the district court’s judgment for essentially the reasons set out in that court’s Opinion and Order, *Mendez v. West,*177 F.Supp.2d 121 (D.P.R.2001), there being nothing to add to the discussion contained therein.

*Affirmed. See*Local Rule 27(c).
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 1728

In re: JOHN WILLIAMS MILLER , Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia . ( 3:20

- cv - 00844

- TMC )

Submitted : August 7, 2023 Decided: August 16, 2023

Before HARRIS and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Petitions denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
John Williams Miller, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1728 Doc: 21 Filed: 08/16/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM : John Williams Miller petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to reinstate his employment discr imination action and enter judgment in his favor. Miller also seeks to strike or revise various entries i n the district court’s docket report. We conclude that Miller is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be u sed only in extraordinary circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. , 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy

- Brown,
LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further , mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought and “has no other adequate means to attain the relief [he] desires.” Murphy

- Brown , 907 F.3d at 795 (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4 th Cir. 2007). The relief Miller seeks is not available by way of mandamus

. Indeed, he has already had an opportunity to appeal the district court’s orders, and we affirmed the denial of relief. See Miller v . Apple, Inc. , No. 22

- 2055, 2023 WL 4181279, at *1 (4th Cir. June 26, 2023). Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition and amended mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument woul d not aid the decisional
process. PETITIONS DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1728 Doc: 21 Filed: 08/16/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 23-5024 September Term, 2022 1: 22-c v -037 42-UNA Filed O n: April 10 , 20 23 Pat rick O. Christian,

App ellant v . United Sta tes o f

Am erica, e t al., App ellees ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Pillard an d Childs, Circuit Jud ges, an d S ent elle, S enio r Circuit

Judge J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l was co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the brief f iled b y ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P
. 34(a )(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34 (j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s Ja nua ry 4, 202 3 a nd Janu ary19 , 20 23 orde rs be af f irmed . T he district cou rt correctly conclud ed tha t app ellant ’s com plaint , which lacked an arguab le ba sis eithe r in law or in fact, was f rivolou s. S ee Neitzke v . W illiams, 4 90 U.S. 3 19, 32 5 (19 89); see also 2 8 U.S .C. § 1 915 (e)(2)(B)( i) (prov iding tha t “the cou rt sha ll dismiss t he case at a ny time if the court det ermin es th at .
. . the actio n o r app eal .
. . is f rivolou s or m alicious”). A nd the district cou rt did notab use its discretio n in den y ing app ellant ’s mo tion for po st-judgme nt relief un der Fe dera l Rule o f

Civ il Proced ure 5 9(e). S ee, e.g., Ciralsky v . CIA, 35 5 F.3 d 661 , 66 8 (D.C. Cir. 20 04).

# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 23-5024 September Term, 2022 Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41
. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Michael C. McGrail Depu ty Cl erk

Page 2
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

NICHOLE MEDICAL EQUI PMENT & SUPPLY, INC., Plaintiff,

AND

DOMINIC ROTELLA, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Apellee.

______________________

2013

- 5101

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal
Claims in No. 12

- CV

- 0364, Senior Judge Eric G. Bru ggink.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R Case: 13-5101 Document: 27 Page: 1 Filed: 01/14/2014NICHOLE MEDICAL EQUI PMENT v. US 2

Dominic Rotella moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Nichole Medical Equipment & Supply, Inc. has not responded to the court’s November 19, 2013 order.

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) Rotella’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

(2) The case will proceed only as to the pro se appe llant. The revised official caption is reflected above. A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

s21 Case: 13-5101 Document: 27 Page: 2 Filed: 01/14/2014
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 29 (Friday, February 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 7538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02937]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9025-5]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www2.epa.gov/nepa.
    Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs), Filed 02/
01/2016 Through 02/05/2016, Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-nepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20160028, Final, FHWA, WI, I-94 East-West Corridor (70th St--
16th St) Project, Review Period Ends: 03/14/2016, Contact: Michael 
Davies, 608-829-7500.
EIS No. 20160029, Final, BPA, WA, I-5 Corridor Reinforcement Project, 
Review Period Ends: 03/14/2016, Contact: Nancy A. Wittpenn 503-230-
3297.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20150346, Draft, OSM, TN, North Cumberland Wildlife Management 
Area, Tennessee, Lands Unsuitable for Mining, Comment Period Ends: 02/
26/2016, Contact: Earl Bandy 865-545-4103 ext. 130, Revision to FR 
Notice Published 12/11/2015; OSM reopened the comment period that ended 
01/025/2016 and extended to 02/26/2016.

    Dated: February 9, 2016.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2016-02937 Filed 2-11-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KAREN M. BAKER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

WALGREENS ARIZONA DRUG 

COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

No. 16-16189 

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-00342-JAT 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 24, 2017**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, 

Circuit Judges.

Karen M. Baker appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment 

in her action alleging discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in 

Employment Act, Title VII, and state law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 31 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 16-16189 

§ 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a district court’s discovery rulings. 

Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Baker’s 

discovery motions because Baker did not comply with the district court’s 

scheduling order and did not show that denial of her motions resulted in actual and 

substantial prejudice. See In re Arizona, 528 F.3d 652, 657 (9th Cir. 2008) 

(“Failure to comply with the scheduling order exposes a party to ‘any just orders,’ 

as determined by the district judge, including dismissal.”); Laub v. U.S. Dep’t of 

Interior, 342 F.3d 1080, 1093 (9th Cir. 2003) (district court’s decision to deny 

discovery will not be disturbed unless there is a clear showing that the denial 

“results in actual and substantial prejudice to the complaining litigant” (internal 

citation omitted)).

Baker waived any arguments regarding the “Initial Discovery Protocols for 

Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action” because she did not raise this issue 

before the district court. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) 

(“[W]e will not consider arguments that are raised for the first time on appeal.”).

We do not consider documents not filed with the district court. See United 

States v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts not 

presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).

Baker does not challenge the district court’s summary judgment for 
 3 16-16189 

defendants in her opening brief and has therefore waived any objection to the 

district court’s summary judgment on appeal. See Paladin Assocs., Inc. v. Mont. 

Power Co., 328 F.3d 1145, 1164 (9th Cir. 2003).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I,  Stephen
Brock, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008 of Public Company
Management Corporation fully complies  with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Public Company
Management Corporation.





Date:  January
26, 2009





By:
              /s/ Stephen BrockStephen
      Brock,Chief
      Executive Officer





I,  Trae
O'Neil High, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008 of Public Company
Management Corporation fully complies  with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Public Company
Management Corporation.





Date:  January
26, 2009





By:
              /s/ Trae O'Neil HighTrae
      O'Neil HighChief
      Financial Officer
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

916 

KA 15-00785 

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TRAVON CARTER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

MARY R. HUMPHREY, NEW HARTFORD, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Michael L.

Dwyer, J.), rendered April 2, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant,

upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon a plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law 

§ 160.15 [4]). Defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal

forecloses our review of his challenge to County Court’s suppression

ruling (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833), and his challenge to the

severity of the sentence (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered: February 10, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
      undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly
      Report on Form 10 QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





This
      14th
      day of August, 2006.











/s/
      Stephen D. Barnhill, M.D.


Stephen
      D. Barnhill, M.D.


Chief
      Executive Officer and Chairman
Independent Accountant's Report


November 4, 1996

To the Board of Directors
of Oakwood Acceptance Corporation



<PAGE>


We have examined management's assertion about Oakwood Acceptance Corporation's
(the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended September 30, 1996
included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for
the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
September 30, 1996 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP



<PAGE>










November 4, 1996


Price Waterhouse LLP
Suite 1800
200 West 2nd Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27101

Ladies and Gentlemen:

As of and for the year ended September 30, 1996, Oakwood Acceptance Corporation
(OAC) has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards
set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (the "USAP"). As of and for this same
period, OAC had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the
amount of $5,000,000 and $1,400,000 respectively.



/s/ Nicholas J St. George           /s/ C. Michael Kilbourne
Nicholas J. St. George, Chief       C. Michael Kilbourne, Financial Officer
Executive Officer




/s/ Michael D. Rutherford           /s/ Douglass R Muir
Michael D. Rutherford,             Douglas R. Muir, VP, Treasurer/Secretary
Controller   




/s/ Larry T. Gilmore                /s/ Jimmy S. Griffin
Larry T. Gilmore, EVP-Consumer      Jimmy S. Griffin, VP-Loan Servicing
Finance     




<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 2628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00671]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Healthcare Decision Making.
    Date: January 30, 2024.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kimberly Firth, Ph.D., National Institutes of 
Health, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7702, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#24424d56504c4f496449454d480a4a4d4c0a434b52"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d5b3bca7a1bdbeb895b8b4bcb9fbbbbcbdfbb2baa3">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 10, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-00671 Filed 1-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>