alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 31 October 2006         

drawing up the list of regions and areas eligible for funding from the European Regional Development Fund under the cross-border and transnational strands of the European territorial cooperation objective for the period 2007 to 2013

(notified under document number C(2006) 5144)

(2006/769/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions for the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

After consulting the Coordination Committee of the Funds referred to in Article 103 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

For the purpose of cross-border cooperation, as referred to in Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, the regions eligible for funding from the European Regional Development Fund under the European territorial cooperation objective shall be those listed in Annex I.

Article 2

For the purpose of transnational cooperation, as referred to in Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, the areas eligible for funding from the European Regional Development Fund under the European territorial cooperation objective shall be those listed in Annex II.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 October 2006.

For the Commission

Danuta HÜBNER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 25.

----

ANNEX I

List of NUTS level III regions eligible for funding from the European Regional Development Fund under the cross-border strand of the European territorial cooperation objective for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013               

----

ANNEX II

List of areas and of NUTS level II regions eligible for funding from the European Regional Development Fund under the transnational strand of the European territorial cooperation objective for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013               

AZORES-MADEIRA-CANARY ISLANDS (MACARONESIA)

ALPINE SPACE

ATLANTIC COAST

BALTIC SEA

CARIBBEAN AREA

EAST-CENTRAL EUROPE

INDIAN OCEAN AREA

MEDITERRANEAN (*1)

NORTH SEA

NORTH WEST EUROPE

NORTHERN PERIPHERY

SOUTH EAST EUROPE

SOUTH WEST EUROPE (*2)

----

(*1)  The area also includes Gibraltar.

(*2)  The area also includes Gibraltar.

----
```

[Federal Register: March 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 58)]
[Notices]               
[Page 14577]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26mr10-40]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: Thursday, April 8, 2010, 9 a.m.-12 Noon & 1 p.m.-3 p.m.

Place: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

Status: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. Toxicity of Metals in Consumer Products (9 a.m.-12 noon).
    2. Testing and Conformance (15 Month Rule)--Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking (NPR) (1 p.m.-3 p.m.).
    A live Webcast of the meeting can be viewed at http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast/index.html.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

Contact Person for More Information: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: March 24, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-6937 Filed 3-24-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 31.2 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION I, Jack Braverman, certify
that: 1.
I have reviewed this year
  end report on Form 10-KSB of Trimol Group, Inc.2.
Based on my knowledge,
  this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
  to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
  the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
  respect to the period covered by this report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the
  financial statements, and other financial information included in this
  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the
  periods presented in this report;4.
The registrants other
  certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14
  and 15d-14) for the registrant, and we have:d.
designed such disclosure
  controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the
  registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
  others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
  report is being prepared;e.
evaluated the
  effectiveness of this registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a
  date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation
  Date); andf.
presented in this report
  our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
  procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5.
The registrants other
  certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
  evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the registrants board of
  directors:c.
All significant
  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
  adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
  report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any
  material weaknesses in internal controls; andd.
any fraud, whether or not
  material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
  role in the registrants internal controls; and6.
The registrants other
  certifying offers and I have indicated in this report whether or not there
  were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
  significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
  recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
  significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  April 17, 2007
/s/ Jack BravermanJack BravermanChief Financial Officer 35
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1577

AN ACT

To authorize appropriations for the National Historical Publications and Records Commission for fiscal years 1998,

1999, 2000, and 2001.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1577 ES

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR

2 THE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PUBLICATIONS

3 AND RECORDS COMMISSION.

4 Section 2504(f)(1) of title 44, United States Code,

5 is amended—

6 (1) in subparagraph (F) by striking out ‘‘and’’

7 after the semicolon;

8 (2) in subparagraph (G) by striking out the pe9 riod and inserting in lieu thereof a semicolon; and

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub11 paragraphs:

12 ‘‘(H) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1998;

13 ‘‘(I) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1999;

14 ‘‘(J) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2000; and

15 ‘‘(K) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2001.’’.

Passed the Senate July 25, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1577

AN ACT

To authorize appropriations for the National Hisfiscal years 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001. torical Publications and Records Commission for
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM ONLINE SYSTEM
SERVICES, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,680,282
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  759,389
<ALLOWANCES>                                    58,059
<INVENTORY>                                    235,441
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,087,478
<PP&E>                                       1,370,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                 354,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,326,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,219,306
<BONDS>                                            585
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,483,282
<COMMON>                                     8,635,075
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,011,757)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,326,491
<SALES>                                      1,117,358
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,791,556
<CGS>                                          972,260
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,993,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,341,612
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,375,279)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,375,279)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,375,279)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.05)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00121-CR

JEFFREY DEAN GERRON,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 36,660CR

ORDER

In a motion filed on September 2, 2014, appellant asked this Court to order the 

originals of Defendant’s Exhibits 4, 6, 8, and 9, which were admitted into evidence 

during a pretrial hearing for the sole purpose of the hearing, to be delivered to this 

Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(g)(2) (giving the appellate court the authority to direct 

the delivery of original exhibits to the appellate court). These exhibits were also 

excluded during the guilt/innocence phase of the trial. Appellant contends these 

exhibits are necessary for issues to be presented in his appeal. Appellant’s motion is 
Jeffrey Dean Gerron v. The State of Texas Page 2

granted. The trial court clerk or the court reporter, whoever currently possesses the 

original exhibits, is ordered to send to this Court, by courier receipted delivery or by 

hand delivery, the original of Defendant’s Exhibits 4, 6, 8, and 9. Once the opinion of 

the Court issues in this appeal, the exhibits will be returned, by courier receipted 

delivery or hand delivery, to the clerk or reporter, whoever was in possession of the 

exhibits. 

Appellant also requested reasonable access to Defendant’s Exhibits 4, 6, 8, and 9 

for use in the preparation of appellant’s brief. That request is also granted. The specific 

details of appellant’s access are to be determined by a subsequent motion by appellant 

when the extent and timing of the access needed can be more readily determined.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted

Order issued and filed September 18, 2014
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4954 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require members of the Armed 

Forces to receive additional training under the Transition Assistance 

Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2018 

Mrs. MURPHY of Florida (for herself, Mr. BERGMAN, Ms. SINEMA, and Mr. 

CURBELO of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require members 

of the Armed Forces to receive additional training under 

the Transition Assistance Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Better Access to Tech5 nical Training, Learning, and Entrepreneurship for Ser6 vicemembers Act’’ or the ‘‘BATTLE for Servicemembers 

7 Act’’. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4954 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRED TRAINING; WAIVERS. 

2 Section 1144(f) of title 10, United States Code, is 

3 amended— 

4 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘OPPORTUNI5 TIES’’; 

6 (2) in paragraph (1)— 

7 (A) by inserting ‘‘and subject to paragraph 

8 (2)’’ after ‘‘section’’; 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘the Secretary of Defense’’ 

10 and all that follows through ‘‘shall permit’’; and 

11 (C) by striking ‘‘to elect to’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘shall’’; and 

13 (3) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the 

14 following new paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(2) The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of 

16 Homeland Security shall, under regulations such Secre17 taries shall prescribe, waive the additional training under 

18 paragraph (1) for: 

19 ‘‘(A) Such groups or classifications of members 

20 as the Secretaries determine, after consultation with 

21 the Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of Vet22 erans Affairs, for whom participation is not and 

23 would not be of assistance to such members based 

24 on the articulable justification of the Secretaries 

25 that there is extraordinarily high reason to believe 

26 the exempted members are unlikely to face major reVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:50 Feb 09, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4954.IH H4954

daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4954 IH

1 adjustment, health care, employment, or other chal2 lenges associated with transition to civilian life. 

3 ‘‘(B) A member possessing specialized skills 

4 who, due to unavoidable circumstances, is needed to 

5 support the imminent deployment of a unit. 

6 ‘‘(C) A member who elects in writing not to re7 ceive such additional training.’’. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

MERISTAR HOSPITALITY OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CERTIFICATION PURSAUNT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MeriStar Hospitality Operating
Partnership, L.P., (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June
30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Paul W. Whetsell, Chief Executive Officer of MeriStar
Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P., certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



|   |  |                                                                                                                            
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



|   |  |                                                                                                                                                        
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Registrant.

/s/ PAUL W. WHETSELL

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-60852

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSEPH TERRELL KELLY,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:02-CR-146-2

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Joseph Terrell Kelly appeals the revocation of his 

supervised release. He contends that the district court erred in finding that he 

violated the conditions of his supervised release by committing the new 

criminal offense of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Kelly concedes that 

he was a convicted felon and was arrested in possession of a gun but asserts

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 24, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-60852 Document: 00514085272 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/24/2017
No. 16-60852

2

that he was legally justified in possessing the gun because he took it to protect 

himself from an imminent threat of danger.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, a 

reasonable trier of fact could have concluded that Kelly committed the offense

of being a felon in possession of a firearm and was not entitled to the defense 

of justification. See United States v. Alaniz-Alaniz, 38 F.3d 788, 792 (5th Cir. 

1994). The evidence does not support the conclusion that Kelly had the gun in 

response to an imminent threat of harm or that, in reacting to a reasonable 

and immediate fear for his life and safety, he temporarily possessed the gun in 

the course of defending himself. See United States v. Gant, 691 F.2d 1159, 1162 

(5th Cir. 1982); United States v. Panter, 688 F.2d 268, 272 (5th Cir. 1982). 

Neither does the record support a conclusion that there was a continuing 

threat to Kelly’s – or any other person’s – life or safety when he was found with

the gun approximately four hours after he first took possession of it. Kelly may 

not assert the defense of justification when, as here, there was not a real 

emergency that left no time to seek a reasonable, legal alternative, and when 

he had the firearm for a significant period after the purported time of 

endangerment. See Gant, 691 F.2d at 1163-64; Panter, 688 F.2d at 272. 

In sum, there was sufficient evidence to support the conclusion that

Kelly violated the conditions of his supervised release and that revocation was 

merited. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); United States v. Jang, 574 F.3d 263, 265-

67 (5th Cir. 2009). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-60852 Document: 00514085272 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/24/2017
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 10, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00411

- CV

REPSOL OIL AND GAS USA, LLC as successor of Talisman Energy USA Inc, Statoil Te xas Onshore Properties, LLC, and Statoil Pipelines, LLC, and OGE, LLC

, Appellant s

v.

MATRIX PETROLEUM, LLC , Matrix Petroleum Holdings LLC, JAR Resources Holdings, L.P., and TMRX Petroleum, LLC, Appellee s

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Sall e County, Texas
Trial Court No. 14

- 08

- 00158

- CVL Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The reporter’s record was originally due September 24, 2018. This court has granted the
court reporter numerous extensions. Our order granting the last extension stated no further extensions would be granted without a timely request demonstrating extraordinary circumstances, advising the court on efforts expended to prepare the reporter’s record, and providing reaso nable assurance that the reporter’s record will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline.

The court reporter has filed another request for another 30

- day extension. The request demonstrates extraordinary circumstances, advises the court on the efforts expended to prepare the reporter’s record, and reasonably assures the court that the reporter’s record will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. We therefore grant the court reporter’s request, and order the court repo rter, Leticia M. Escamilla, to file the reporter’s record by January 28, 2019.

However, the court reporter is advised that no further extensions will be granted without

any ne w, extraordinary circumstances.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 10th day of January, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 10.9


                PRENTISS PROPERTIES ACQUISITION PARTNERS, L.P.

    TENTH AMENDMENT TO THE SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED
         PARTNERSHIP OF PRENTISS PROPERTIES ACQUISITION PARTNERS, L.P.


                                   RECITALS

          A.   Belcrest Realty Corporation ("ASSIGNOR")desires to assign and
Belmar Realty Corporation ("ASSIGNEE") desires to acquire 350,000 Series B
Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Units (THE "ASSIGNED UNITS") of
Prentiss Properties Acquisition Partners, L.P. (the "PARTNERSHIP").

          Pursuant to Article XI of the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership, as amended (as so amended, the "AGREEMENT"), of the
Partnership, Prentiss Properties I, Inc. as the sole general partner of the
Partnership (the "GENERAL PARTNER"), desires to amend the Agreement to admit
Assignee as a Substitute Limited Partner with respect to the Assigned Units.

          NOW, THEREFORE, the General Partner hereby adopts the following
amendment to the Agreement.

          1.   Exhibit A to the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its
entirety as set forth on EXHIBIT A attached hereto.

          2.   Assignee accepts and agrees to be bound by the terms and
provisions of the Agreement.

                           [Signature Page Follows]

                                       1
<PAGE>

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the General Partner and the Assignee have
executed this Tenth Amendment as of May ___, 2000.

                                   GENERAL PARTNER

                                   PRENTISS PROPERTIES I, INC.


                                        By:  /s/ MICHAEL A. ERNST
                                           ------------------------------------
                                        Name:    Michael A. Ernst
                                        Title:   Chief Financial Officer


                                   ASSIGNEE AND SUBSTITUTE LIMITED PARTNER:

                                   BELMAR REALTY CORPORATION

                                        By:  /s/ THOMAS E. FAUST, JR.
                                           ------------------------------------
                                        Name:    Thomas E. Faust, Jr.
                                        Title:   Executive Vice President

                                       2