alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Final Notes July 9, 2010 

Steam Study Data Review Notes 

Cyanide Standard Method 4500 CN-

 E (1990) 

(Colorimetric Method) 

1. The sample should be diluted if necessary so that the aliquot used in the distillation step 

contains ≤ 10 mg CN- /L.

2. If S2- was detected, it should be removed to undetected levels prior to distillation. If 

reported, indicate whether S2- was detected and note the removal method (4500 CN 

C/4a).

3. The sample should be acidified prior to distillation. The sample should be refluxed for ≥

1 hour and after refluxing the heat should be discontinued, but air flow continued for ≥ 15 

minutes (4500 CN C/4d).

4. After the addition of chloramine-T solution and acetate buffer, the sample should be 

allowed to stand for exactly 2 minutes. After the addition of pyridine-barbituric acid 

reagent, the color should be allowed to develop for 8 minutes (4500 CN E/4b).

5. A spectrophotometer with the capability of taking measurements at 578 nm or a filter 

photometer having a maximum transmittance from 570 to 580 nm should be used in the 

analysis (4500 CN E/2).

6. Distillation standards should be periodically used to verify the accuracy of the apparatus, 

reagents, and/or other variables. (For example, it is recommended that a standard 

containing 1mg CN-

 /L should have a percent recovery of 96 -104%) (4500 CN C/4g). If 

provided, what were the concentrations and percent recoveries of these standards?

7. *If the analyte concentration in a sample was less than 5 times the analyte concentration 

in the laboratory reagent blank (if reported1), report the result as a nondetect. List all 

affected samples: 

8. *If the analyte concentration in a sample was less than 10 times but greater than 5 times 

the analyte concentration in the laboratory reagent blank (if reported1), was the result 

reported as an estimated value? List all affected samples. 

 

1

 Note: It is optional for the laboratory to analyze a separate blank other than the blank used to create the calibration 

curve.
Francis C. Heil

Senior Attorney

Legal

1101 17th St NW

Suite 600

Washington DC 20036

202-496-5642 Office

francis.heil@aa.com

October 23, 2013

Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: American Airlines, Inc., New York (JFK) - Haneda Slot Pair Return Notice

 DOT-OST-2010-0018

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

American Airlines Inc. (American) hereby provides notice that it will cease operating its’

New York (JFK) -Haneda flight as of December 1, 2013, and as such returning to the Department 

the JFK-HND slot pair granted by Order 2010-7-2 in Docket DOT-OST-2010-0018 effective 

December 2, 2013. 

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Respectfully submitted,

Francis C. Heil

cc: Docket Branch

Service list
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document by email on the following 

persons:

howard.kass@usairways.com

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com

chris.walker@delta.com

dan.weiss@untited.com

karine.faden@united.com

thomas.bolling@united.com

megan.lawrence@alaska.com

kyle.levine@alaska.com

hoyt.zia@hawaiian.com

mark.arimoto@hawaiian.com

jhill@dowlohnes.com

lhalloway@crowell.com

____________________

FRANCIS C. HEIL

October 23, 2013
#### Anthony L. ASCIUTTO, Annetta Asciutto, Gaetano Bruni, and Mary E. Bruni, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Carl F. BRIM, Ora G. Brim, and Marshall J. Holman, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Cecil Z. JANOLO and Marilyn A. Janolo, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Stan NAISBITT, Teresa R. Naisbitt, Gerald D. Belford, Patsy J. Belford, and Kathleen M. Belford, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. James M. RAU and Paula C. Rau, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

Nos. 93-70035, 93-70057, 93-70084, 93-70266 and 93-70314.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted, June 7, 1994.*

Decided June 17, 1994.

Decían J. O’Donnell, Englewood, CO, for petitioners-appellants.

Gary R. Allen, David I. Pincus, Kevin M. Brown, Tax Div., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent-appellee.

Before: D.W. NELSON, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4.

ORDER

For the reasons expressed in *Bax v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue,*13 F.3d 54 (2d Cir.1993), the judgment of the United States Tax Court is affirmed.

The facts in *Bax*differ from the facts of these cases in only one respect: here, plaintiffs Gaetano and Mary Bruni prepaid the interest with respect to one tax year. The decision in *Bax,*however, also provides the appropriate rationale for our holding today that, even if the Tax Court had jurisdiction, the taxpayers’ claims fail on the merits. *See id.,*13 F.3d at 58.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    Date: May 15, 2008
    /s/ Akio AriuraAkio AriuraChief Financial Officer and Secretary
AMDL, Inc.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-11294 Summary Calendar

MARK ANTHONY CLARK, also known as Kevin Frank Carter, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN DOE, 1, Drug Enforcement Agency; JANE DOE, #1, Booking Officer; DR. VERNON FARTHING; JOHN DOE, 2, Sergeant Classification Officer; DON ADDINGTON, Jail Administrator; D.L. “SONNY” KEESEE, Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:97-CV-78-C

- - - - - - - - - - August 20, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Mark Anthony Clark, federal prisoner # 26409-077, has appealed the dismissal as frivolous of his civil rights action, based on events which allegedly occurred when he was a Lubbock County Jail (“the Jail”) inmate. We AFFIRM. Clark alleged claims (1) that he was denied medical treatment for tuberculosis; (2) that he was housed underNo. 97-11294 -2- overcrowded, unsafe conditions; (3) that he was exposed to harmful environmental tobacco smoke; and (4) that he was placed in administrative segregation without due process. The magistrate judge filed a report recommending dismissal of the action, based on Clark’s answers to a questionnaire and his medical and other jail records. See Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 9 (5th Cir. 1994); Banuelos v. McFarland , 41 F.3d 232, 233-34 (5th Cir. 1995). The magistrate judge notified Clark of the necessity for filing objections to the report, citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and other authorities. However, Clark made only a general objection that his claims were not frivolous. In the final order of dismissal with prejudice, the district court observed that Clark’s objections were inadequate, then accepted the magistrate judge’s report after de novo review. Under these circumstances, Clark is not entitled to relief on appeal unless there was plain error in the district court proceedings. See Douglass v. United Services Auto. Ass’n , 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). Under the plain-error rule, if an appellant shows clear or obvious error that affects his substantial rights, this court has discretion to correct a forfeited error that seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. See United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc). When the nature of the claimed error is a question of fact, however, the possibility that such a finding could rise to the level of obvious error required to meetNo. 97-11294 -3- part of the standard for plain error is remote. Robertson v. Plano City of Texas , 70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th Cir. 1995). Clark’s appeal is based on his contention that findings of fact stated in the magistrate judge’s report are erroneous, based on his alleged recollection of what happened to him in the Jail. Accordingly, Clark is not entitled to relief on grounds of plain

error. See Robertson , 70 F.3d at 23.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
1 ... S eeTe x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 36 6- CV I N RE F REQU ENT F L YER DEP O T, I NC . , RE L ATO RS G EO R G E PI R K LE, A N D RO BE R T P I R K LE

----- ----- -- OR I GI NALP R OCE E DI NG

----- ----- -- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON 1

----- ----- -- The c our tha s con si der ed r el at or s’ pe t i t i on f orw r i tofm and am us an d mo t i o n f o r e me r g e n c y r e l i e f a n d i s o f t h e o p i n i o n t h a t r e l i e f s h o u l d be deni ed b e c a u s e re l a to rs h a v e a n a d e q u a te re m e d yb ya p p e a l . A c c o rd i n g l y , th e c o u rt d e n i e s re l a to rs’ pe ti ti o n for w ri t of m a n d a m u s a n d m o ti o n for e m e rge n c yrel i e f. R el at or s shal l pay al l cost s oft hi s or i gi nal pr oceedi ng, f orw hi ch l et execut i on i ssue. P E R CU R I AM PA N EL: M C C O Y, LI V I N G STO N , an d DA U PH I N O T, JJ. DEL I VERE D: Se pt e m be r15, 2008
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 11, 2015 

# Order

December 11, 2015

152613 ( 65 )

THE LUBRIZOL CORPORATION

, Plaintiff

- Appell ant

,

v

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

, Defendant

- Appell ee

. SC: 152613

COA: 325541

Ct of Claims: 14

- 000143

- MT

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for the temporary admission of out

- of

state attorneys Jonathan A. Feldman and E ric A. Tresh to appear and practice on behalf

of plaintiff

- appellant under MCR 8.126(A) is GRANTED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-22-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,226
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,148
<ALLOWANCES>                                       446
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         501,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,507
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 531,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           203
<OTHER-SE>                                     325,018
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   531,026
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,787
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,996
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,996
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 5D 2 3

- 927 LT Case No. 2022

- CF

- 569

_____________________________
C HARLES J ASON D ARNELL ,
Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA ,
Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County

. Jason Nimeth , Judge

.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Natalie R. Gossett, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marissa V. Giles, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

October 24, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.

A FFIRMED

.

W ALLIS , J AY , and E ISNAUGLE , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
Exhibit 10.2


 




	
  

   

   

  	
  [LOGO]

  






 















	
  

  	
  [LOGO]

  






 















	
  

  	
  [LOGO]
Exhibit 15.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Elbit Vision Systems Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form F-1 (File No.333-145005), Form F-2 (File No's 333-115095 and 333-120034), Form F-3 (File No’s 333-134591 and 333-114153) and on Form S-8 (File No.333-144991) of our report dated July __, 2011, which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding going concern uncertainty, relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010.




/s/ Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.


Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.


Certified Public Accountants


A Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu


Tel-Aviv, Israel


July 13, 2011
Served : Februar y 11,201 1

( ^ UNITE D STATE S O F AMERIC A

DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC E O F TH E SECRETAR Y WASHINGTON , D.C .

Issue db y th e Departmen t o f Transporti o n th e 11" " o f

February , 201 1 DSfTRA-ALASK

A BUS H SERVIC E MAI L RATE S DOCKE T OST-2003-1469 4

NOTIC E O F EXTENSIO N O n Decembe r

23 , 2010 , w e directe dpartie s t o sho w caus e wh y w e shoul dnot mak e final th e rate s tentativel y se t

b y Orde r 2010-12-28 , with objection s du e n o late r tha n 2 0 day s (January 12 ) after

th e issuanc e o f

th e order . O n Januar y 1 1 Mr . Han k Myer s requeste dtha t w e exten dth e deadlin e for objection s b y 1 5 days , i.e. , throug h Januar y 27 . W e receive dtimel y file dobjection s fro mth e Unite dState s Posta l Service , Rya n Air, Inc. , Th e Consolidate dCarriers , an dfro mthre e commonl y owne dcarrier s - Frontie r Flyin g Service , Inc. , Hagelan dAviatio n Services , Inc. , an dEr aAviation , Inc. , (Frontier) . O n February 4 , 2011 , Peninsul aAirways , Inc. , (PenAir ) file damotio n t o exten dth e commen t perio dt o February 22 , 2011 . O n February 7 , 2011 , th e Posta l Servic e concurre dwith PenAir' s motion . W e hav e decide dt o gran t th e request . Al l partie s shoul dfile thei r comment s n o late r

tha n February 22 , 2011 . A s thi s i s th e secon dextension , w e d o not anticipat e grantin g an y further extensions . Denni s DeVany , Chief , EA S an dDomesti c Analysi s A n electroni c versio n o f

thi s documen t

i s availabl e o n th e Worl dWid e We b at http://ww w .regulations . go v
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





I, James E. Horswill,PrincipalOfficer
and Chief Financial Officer of microHelix, Inc., certify
that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of microHelix, Inc.;




2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;





4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:





(a)Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)Evaluated the
effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c)Disclosed in
this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting; and





5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):





(a)All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and




(b)Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date: March 24, 2009
                      /s/ James E. HorswillJames E. HorswillPrincipal Executive Officer and
      ChiefFinancial
Officer
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Sylvia Quintero, Chief Operating Officer, of Arizona
Aircraft Spares, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Date: December 15, 2003                By: /s/  Sylvia Quintero
                                       Chief Operating Officer (Principal
                                       Accounting and Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 13.A

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Canadian Zinc Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I,  John F. Kearney, President and Chief Executive Officer of Canadian Zinc Corporation hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



1.

The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.

The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





Date: June 30, 2006



/s/ John F. Kearney

President and Chief Executive Officer
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 Current Report
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 October 22, 2007
 LEINER HEALTH PRODUCTS INC.
  DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    
    333-33121
(Commission File Number)
    
    
    95-3431709
(IRS Employer IdentificationNumber)
 901 East 233rd Street, Carson, California
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    
    90745
(Zip Code)
 (310) 835-8400
 N/A
   o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 8.01 Other Events.SIGNATURE    Table of Contents  
 Item 8.01 Other Events
    -2-




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURE
  Leiner Health Products Inc.By:
    /s/ Robert K. ReynoldsRobert K. ReynoldsPresident and Chief Operating Officer  -3-
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6233]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. McKEON:
        H.R. 6469.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2: The Congress shall have 
     Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and 
     Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property 
     belonging to the United States; and nothing in this 
     Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims 
     of the United States, or of any particular State.
```