3428 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 12 / Thursday, January 18, 2024 / Notices 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain electronic computing devices, 

and components and modules thereof 

by reason of the infringement of certain 

claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,641,841 

(‘‘the ’841 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 

10,142,659 (‘‘the ’659 patent’’); U.S. 

Patent No. 10,708,618 (‘‘the ’618 

patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 10,708,613 

(‘‘the ’613 patent’’). The complaint 

further alleges that an industry in the 

United States exists as required by the 

applicable Federal Statute. The 

complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2023). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

January 10, 2024, Ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 

1–3, 5–7, 9–11, 14, 15 and 16 of the ’841 

Patent; claims 1- 7, and 10–16 of the 

’659 patent; claims 1–19 of the ’618 

patent; and claims 1–9 of the ’613 

patent; and whether an industry in the 

United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘laptop, desktop and 

chromebook computers’’; 

(3) Pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the 

presiding administrative law judge shall 

take evidence or other information and 

hear arguments from the parties or other 

interested persons with respect to the 

public interest in this investigation, as 

appropriate, and provide the 

Commission with findings of fact and a 

recommended determination on this 

issue, which shall be limited to the 

statutory public interest factors set forth 

in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1); 

(4) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: 

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, 

Torshamnsgatan 21, Kista, Stockholm, 

Sweden 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Lenovo (United States) Inc., 8001 

Development Drive, Morrisville, 

North Carolina 27560 

Lenovo Group Limited, 6 Chuang ye 

Road, Haidian District, Beijing 

100085, China 

Lenovo (Shanghai) Electronics 

Technology Co., Ltd., Part 304–305, 

Building 4, No. 222, Meiyue Road, 

Pilot Free Trade Zone, Pudong, New 

District, Shang Hai Shi, 200131 

Shanghai, China 

Lenovo Beijing Co., Limited, 6 Chuang 

ye Road, Haidian District, Beijing 

100085, China 

Lenovo PC HK Limited, 23/F., Lincoln 

House, Taikoo Place, 979 King’s Road, 

Hong Kong 

Lenovo Information Products 

(Shenzhen) Co. Ltd., Fuitan Trade 

Zone, ISH2 Building, No. 3, Guanglan 

Road, 518038 Shenzhen, China 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(5) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 11, 2024. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–00829 Filed 1–17–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1110–0NEW] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Under Attack: 

Assaults on Our Nation’s Law 

Enforcement 

AGENCY: Federal Bureau of 

Investigation, Department of Justice. 

ACTION: 30-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Bureau of 

Investigation, Department of Justice 

(DOJ), will be submitting the following 

information collection request to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed 

information collection was previously 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 12 / Thursday, January 18, 2024 / Notices 3429 

published in the Federal Register on 

November 27, 2023 allowing a 60-day 

comment period. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 30 days until 

February 20, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have comments especially on the 

estimated public burden or associated 

response time, suggestions, or need a 

copy of the proposed information 

collection instrument with instructions 

or additional information, please 

contact: Kevin Harris/FBI CJIS, 1000 

Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, WV 

26306, (304) 625–2000, OSAT@fbi.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and/or 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for this information 

collection should be submitted within 

30 days of the publication of this notice 

on the following website 

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. 

Find this particular information 

collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 

30-day Review—Open for Public 

Comments’’ or by using the search 

function and enter the title of the 

information collection.This information 

collection request may be viewed at 

www.reginfo.gov. Follow the 

instructions to view Department of 

Justice, information collections 

currently under review by OMB. 

DOJ seeks PRA authorization for this 

information collection for three (3) 

years. OMB authorization for an ICR 

cannot be for more than three (3) years 

without renewal. The DOJ notes that 

information collection requirements 

submitted to the OMB for existing ICRs 

receive a month-to-month extension 

while they undergo review. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

1. Type of Information Collection: 

New Collection. 

2. Title of the Form/Collection: Under 

Attack: Assaults on Our Nation’s Law 

Enforcement. 

3. Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: Officer Protocol 

Questionnaire or Offender Protocol 

Questionnaire/FBI CJIS Division. 

4. Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Affected Public: State, Local 

and Tribal governments, individual or 

households. 

Abstract: Serious assaults on law 

enforcement in the United States are a 

growing problem, with both assaults 

with injury and felonious killings of law 

enforcement officers trending upward 

(FBI, 2022). While the Law Enforcement 

Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA) 

data collection answers many questions 

related to these assaults and deaths, 

such as the who, what, when, where, 

and how, the data does not answer why 

these assaults are happening. Without 

knowing and understanding why these 

assaults are happening, we cannot begin 

to prevent them. Outside of the previous 

studies conducted by the FBI, there is a 

lack of research into this question of 

why offenders assault police officers. In 

particular, there is a lack of research 

that looks at both the officer and the 

offender in such incidents, and how the 

relationship between the two impacts 

the assault. The purposes of this 

qualitative study are to examine the 

possibility of predicting assaults on 

officers and to use this information to 

prevent future assaults. To date, very 

few studies outside of the FBI’s Officer 

Safety Awareness Training (OSAT) 

research projects, have looked at these 

assaults from the perspectives of both 

the officer and the offender. By 

interviewing officers and offenders, this 

study seeks to gain a more thorough 

understanding of why these incidents 

take place, and the context surrounding 

them. Based on the recent trends and 

the modicum of previous research, it is 

expected the current study would make 

a large contribution to what is currently 

known about these attacks, and would 

play a substantial role in the 

preparedness, prevention, and 

mitigation of these incidents by 

informing those who develop training 

and operational practices. This mixed 

method research effort will use the 

Perpetrator-Motive Research Design 

(PMRD). PMRD is a 12-step 

methodological design that focuses on 

gaining a thorough understanding of the 

motivations of offenders. Interviewing 

incarcerated offenders allows for 

increased accessibility, increased 

sample size, interviewer security, and 

avoidance of ethical or potential legal 

entanglements which interviewers 

might be exposed to while questioning 

offenders still at large or whose cases 

have not yet exhausted the criminal 

legal process. Because PMRD is suited 

to identify and understand offender 

motives, the findings can be used in the 

development of training interventions 

for law enforcement officials which 

could improve officer safety. As part of 

the study, researchers will also seek to 

examine the incident reports associated 

with the assaults and the FBI criminal 

history record information of offenders. 

Researchers will also seek to obtain, 

examine, and use any body-worn 

camera or dashboard camera recordings 

associated with the assaults for research 

and training purposes. 

5. Obligation to Respond: Voluntary. 

6. Total Estimated Number of 

Respondents: 120. 

7. Estimated Time per Respondent: 2 

hours. 

8. Frequency: This is a one-time 

collection. 

9. Total Estimated Annual Time 

Burden: 240. 

10. Total Estimated Annual Other 

Costs Burden: $0. 

If additional information is required, 

contact: Darwin Arceo, Department 

Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning 

Staff, Justice Management Division, 

United States Department of Justice, 

Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street 

NE, 4W–218 Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: January 12, 2024. 

Darwin Arceo, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2024–00926 Filed 1–17–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1121–0314] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Extension of a 

Previously Approved Collection; 

Firearm Inquiry Statistics (FIST) 

Program 

AGENCY: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 

Department of Justice. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES