alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1566/2006

of 19 October 2006         

fixing the export refunds on white and raw sugar exported without further processing

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the market in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Export refunds as provided for in Article 32 of Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 shall be granted on the products and for the amounts set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 October 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 October 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

----

ANNEX

Export refunds on white and raw sugar exported without further processing applicable from 20 October 2006 (1)

----

(1)  The amounts set out in this Annex are not applicable with effect from 1 February 2005 pursuant to Council Decision 2005/45/EC of 22 December 2004 concerning the conclusion and application of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 as regards the provisions applicable to processed agricultural products (OJ L 23, 26.1.2005, p. 17).

(1)  This amount is applicable to raw sugar with a yield of 92 %. Where the yield for exported raw sugar differs from 92 % the refund amount applicable shall be multiplied, for each exporting operation concerned, by a conversion factor obtained by dividing by 92 the yield of the raw sugar exported, calculated in accordance with paragraph 3 of Point III of the Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 318/2006.

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6393]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The Honorable Kirsten E. Gillibrand led the Pledge of Allegiance as 
follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of 
     America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation 
     under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    August 14, 2008
    
    /s/ Courtney A. BrowerDate
    
    Courtney A. BrowerFinancial Reporting Manager
Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors, LLC,
the Manager of NNN 2002 Value Fund, LLC(principal accounting officer)
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-65,848-06

EX PARTE JOSE ISAAC REYES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR-0932-02-H IN THE 389th DISTRICT COURT

FROM HIDALGO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murder

and sentenced to life imprisonment. 

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. 

The trial court has determined, based upon the record, that counsel failed to timely file a

notice of appeal. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal
2

of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. CR-0932-02-H from the 389th District Court of Hidalgo

County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal

so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the

issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant

is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence

had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should

Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of

appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: June 11, 2014

Do not publish
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, John Hiner, President and Chief Executive Officer of Geocom Resources Inc., and Paul Chung, Chief Financial Officer of Geocom Resources Inc., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Geocom Resources Inc. for the interim period ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Geocom Resources Inc. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated:  February 14, 2007

/s/ John Hiner                                                  

John Hiner

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Paul Chung                                                  

Paul Chung

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 10.13 Test Results


Exhibit 10.13




















2













3













4













5













6













7













8













9













10













11













12













13













14













15













16













17
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 August 27, 2008
 Valeant Pharmaceuticals International
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    1-11397
(Commission File Number)
    
    33-0628076
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 One Enterprise
Aliso Viejo, California 92656   (949) 461-6000
   o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.14d-2(b))o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of            Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.SIGNATURESExhibitsEXHIBIT 99.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 5.02
    
    Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of
Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.
      
 Item 9.01
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Performance Restricted Stock Unit and Matching RSU Award Agreement between Valeant
Pharmaceuticals International and Peter J. Blott.
 2.




---



##### Table of Contents



Forward-Looking Statements
  3.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONALDate: August 27, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Steve T. MinSteve T. MinExecutive Vice President and General Counsel 4.




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Performance Restricted Stock Unit and Matching RSU Award Agreement between Valeant
Pharmaceuticals International and Peter J. Blott.
 5.
The HonorableAnthony Foxx SecretaryofTransportation U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 The Honorable PennyS. Pritzker SecretaryofCommerce U.S. Department ofCommerce 1401 ConstitutionAvenue, NW Washington, DC 20230 The Honorable John F. Kerry SecretaryofState U.S. Department ofState 2201 CStreet, NW Washington, DC 20520 

# = HOST HOTELS &. RESORTS May 21, 2015

Dear Secretary Foxx, SecretaryPritzker and SecretaryKerry: Host Hotels & Resorts is a premier American real estate lodging company, partnering with many renowned brands to bring fine hospitality experiences to millions of guests at our properties each year. We write today because we believe that the policy of Open Skies has led to increased international visitation to the United States and has directly and positively impacted our bottom line and the cities and resorts where our properties are located. In the last several years, our properties have enjoyed steady increases in the number of international visitors. This directly results from the United States' Open Skies policy. By opening newAmerican gatewaycities to global allies, opportunities for travel to the United States have expanded, making a vacation or business trip here more convenient and easier. At a time when U.S. legacy carriers are cutting back their international service and requiring less convenient connections through Europe, the three carriers based in Qatar and the United Arab Emirates have added service rapidly, serving new communities in the U.S., offering more consumer choice. The connections they provide to important regions ofthe world, especially to India, are the areas where much ofthe future growth in international visitors will come.

HOST HOTELS&. RESORTS, INC .· 6903 ROCKLEDGE DRIVE· SUITE 1500 ·BETHESDA, MD 20817 • T (240) 744-1000 F (240) 744- 5494 www.hosthotels .comThe success ofthe Gulfcarriers, in recentyears, is no reason to punish those airlines. Instead, it shows that competition works, and it should be an opportunity for the U.S. carriers to improve their service and win back customers rather than relying on a narrow appeal to protectionismto do thatworkfor them. We strongly urge you to preserve the policy of Open Skies that has worked so well and notgive in to pressures to freeze or restrict anyflights to the United States
. Sincerely,

Minaz Abji Executive Vice President
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60886

Conference Calendar

 

ROY RANDALL HARPER;

H. TRENT EASON,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

RAYMOND ROBERTS; DIRECTOR

OF THE CORRECTIONAL LAW

LIBRARIES; JOHN DOES,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:96-CV-100-D-A

- - - - - - - - - -

June 18, 1997

Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roy Randall Harper, Mississippi state prisoner # 42168, and

H. Trent Eason, Mississippi state prisoner # 47551, argue that

the district court abused its discretion in dismissing their

complaint as frivolous. The appellants alleged in the district

court that they do not receive adequate access to the prison law
No. 96-60886

- 2 -

library and that the problem has been exacerbated by the loss of

their personal word processors.

We have reviewed the record, including the opinion of the

district court, and the appellants’ brief, and find that the

district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the

complaint as frivolous. The appellants’ complaint does not

reflect that their legal positions were prejudiced by their

alleged limited access to the law library or by the loss of their

personal word processors. See Lewis v. Casey, 116 S. Ct. 2174,

2179-80 (1996).

Because the appellants have failed to raise an issue of

arguable merit on appeal, the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th

Cir. R. 42.2.

We caution Harper and Eason that any additional frivolous

appeals filed by either of them will invite the imposition of

sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Harper and Eason are further

cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do

not raise arguments that are frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.1
 Mindspeed Technologies, Inc.
Summary of Director Compensation Arrangements




---



#####
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dresser, Inc. (Dresser) for the period ended March 31,
2005 (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dresser as of the dates and for the periods presented in such Report.



Dated: December 20, 2005



/s/    JAMES A.
NATTIERJames A. Nattier Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       4,914,698
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      91,100,467
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,450,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  8,726,878
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      13,989,481
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        13,998,228
<LOANS>                                     87,855,063
<ALLOWANCE>                                    783,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             124,995,467
<DEPOSITS>                                 112,521,390
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            564,418
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,689,401
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,211,258
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             124,995,467
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,827,602
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,268,177
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               287,124
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             8,382,903
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,813,161
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,813,161
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,569,742
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  309,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (2,117)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,426,609
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,205,248
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,205,248
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   720,085
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.28
<LOANS-NON>                                     24,384
<LOANS-PAST>                                    20,600
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               527,019
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   57,593
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,440
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              783,366
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           783,366
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

WILLIAM C. STUCKEY

v.

SETH RILEY AND BARBARA PIERSON

RILEY

v.

WILLIAM E. STUCKEY, DIANNA P.

STUCKEY, DAWN STUCKEY AND

DIANNA D. STUCKEY

PETITION OF: WILLIAM C. STUCKEY :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 476 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of February, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 24, 2008
 QUESTCOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
  California
(State or Other Jurisdiction 
of Incorporation)
    
    001-14758
(Commission File Number)
    
    33-0476164
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)3260 Whipple Road Union City, California
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    
    
    94587
(Zip Code)
 (510) 400-0700
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the
Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the
Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial ConditionItem 7.01 Regulation FD DisclosureItem 9.01. Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATUREEXHIBIT INDEXEXHIBIT 99.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
   
 Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.
  
 Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. press release dated July 24, 2008.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURE
  Date: July 24, 2008
    
    QUESTCOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.By:
    
    /s/ George StuartGeorge Stuart
Senior Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. press release dated July 24, 2008.
Not For Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3 

# United Stat es Court of Appeals

For the First C ircuit
No. 03-1846 UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, Appellee,

v. WILLIAM A. AIVALIKLES, Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge ]
Before Lynch, Lipez and Howard, Circuit Judges .
William Aivalikles on brief pro se. Karen G. Gr egory , Attorney, Tax Division, Department of Justice, David English Carmack , Attorney, Tax Division, Department of Justice, and Eileen J. O'Connor , Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.

February 24, 2004-2- Per Curiam . William Aivalikles, an attorney acting pro se , appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the government in this tax deficiency case brought under 26 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7403. In response to the government's motion, which was supported with certified assessments for the tax years in question, appellant offered only an aff idavit containing unspecific and unsubstantiated assertions that the assessments overstated the amount of unpaid tax, which he certified as "true to the best of [his] knowledge and belief." The district court properly found the affidavit insufficient to demonstrate any triable issue with regard to the correctness of the tax deficiency assessments. See Perez v. Volvo Car Corp. , 247 F.3d 303, 318 (1st Cir. 2001); Cadle Co. v. Hayes , 116 F.3d 957, 960-61 (1st Cir. 1997).

Affirmed . See 1st Cir. R. 27(c).
August 7

, 2014

Wendy Cleland

- Hamnett

Director

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20460

Dear Director :

This letter serves to provide the answers to the two proposed questions contai ned in your

letter dated 7/23/2014. This letter contains confidential business information (CBI) . This

confidential information is shown in bracketed sections and is underlined

.

Moreover, if the EPA requ ires more time to complete the review process, we request an

extension of an additional 30 days for the EPA to be able to complete their evaluation of

NFC’s requested waiver.

Question # 1 Restated: Specifically addressing NFC’s anticipated revenue from th e contemplated import of Chloranil, and the particular timing provisions under 40 CFR 766.35

for submitting letters of intent, test protocols, and test results after import has commenced,

why does NFC believe that the cost of testing would be economically prohibitive (i.e., would

effectively preclude the contemplated imports)?

Answer to Question #1: [

]Chloranil

August 7 , 2014

Page 2 of 3

Question #2 Restated : Can NFC provide information regarding the starting materials, process

conditions, and reaction conditions used by Jiangyn Yuhua Chemical Co., Ltd., and

Xiangshulxian Yuanda Chemical Co., Ltd., and more specifically, how these materials and

conditions com pare to Clariant Chemical Ltd.’s manufacturer in India?

Answer to Question #2: [

]

[

]

In addition, NFC would like to discuss the MOU. By being a signatory to this document, NFC

feels that it should be able to import Chloranil under the guidelines contained in the MOU and

not to have to conduct the D/F Test Rule Testing.Chloranil

August 7 , 2014

Page 3 of 3

If you have any questions or concerns regarding this information , please contact me at your

earliest conv enience

.

Sincerely,

Phillip McCarter

Vice President

cc: Jay Dickson, Nation Ford Chemical

John Dickson, Nation Ford Chemical

Steve Schmidt, Sun Chemical

Hiroshi Dodohara, US EPA
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 3, 2013

p0327

Order 

April 3, 2013

145995

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145995

COA: 307935

Wayne CC: 01-002954-FH

RYAN MICHAEL JONES,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.