Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 11673 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by May 6, 2016. Filing a petition 

for reconsideration by the Administrator 

of this final rule does not affect the 

finality of this action for the purposes of 

judicial review nor does it extend the 

time within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. Parties with objections to this 

direct final rule are encouraged to file a 

comment in response to the parallel 

notice of proposed rulemaking for this 

action published in the proposed rules 

section of today’s Federal Register, 

rather than file an immediate petition 

for judicial review of this direct final 

rule, so that EPA can withdraw this 

direct final rule and address the 

comment in the proposed rulemaking. 

This action may not be challenged later 

in proceedings to enforce its 

requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen 

dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: February 22, 2016. 

Robert A. Kaplan, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 2. Section 52.726 is amended by 

adding paragraph (pp) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.726 Control strategy: Ozone. 

* * * * * 

(pp) On September 3, 2014, Illinois 

submitted 2011 volatile organic 

compounds and oxides of nitrogen 

emission inventories for the Illinois 

portions of the Chicago-Naperville, 

Illinois-Indiana-Wisconsin and St. 

Louis, Missouri-Illinois nonattainment 

areas for the 2008 ozone national 

ambient air quality standard as a 

revision of the Illinois state 

implementation plan. The emission 

inventories are approved as a revision of 

the state’s implementation plan. 

[FR Doc. 2016–04879 Filed 3–4–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2014–0860; FRL 9943–31– 

Region 5] 

Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; Base 

Year Emission Inventories for the 2008 

8-Hour Ozone Standard 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving a State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 

submitted by the Wisconsin Department 

of Natural Resources (WDNR) on 

November 14, 2014, to address emission 

inventory requirements for the 

Sheboygan nonattainment area 

(Sheboygan area) and the Wisconsin 

portion (Kenosha area) of the ChicagoNaperville, Illinois-Indiana-Wisconsin 

(Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI) 

nonattainment area under the 2008 

ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard (NAAQS or standard). The 

Clean Air Act (CAA) requires emission 

inventories for all ozone nonattainment 

areas. The emission inventories 

contained in Wisconsin’s November 14, 

2014, submission meet this CAA 

requirement. 

DATES: This direct final rule is effective 

on May 6, 2016, unless the EPA receives 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

11674 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

1Biogenic emissions are produced by living 

organisms and are typically not included in the 

base year emission inventories, but are considered 

in ozone modeling analyses, which must consider 

all emissions in a modeled area. 

2The highest ozone concentrations are typically 

monitored during the summer months and, in 

Wisconsin, ozone standard exceedances are 

typically monitored during the months of July 

through September. 

adverse comments by April 6, 2016. If 

adverse comments are received by EPA, 

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 

the direct final rule in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2014–0860 at http://

www.regulations.gov or via email to 

Aburano.Douglas@epa.gov. For 

comments submitted at Regulations.gov, 

follow the online instructions for 

submitting comments. Once submitted, 

comments cannot be edited or removed 

from Regulations.gov. For either manner 

of submission, EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. EPA will generally not consider 

comments or comment contents located 

outside of the primary submission (i.e. 

on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing 

system). For additional submission 

methods, please contact the person 

identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the 

full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Edward Doty, Attainment Planning and 

Maintenance Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 

60604, (312) 886–6057, Doty.Edward@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

the EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION section is arranged as 

follows: 

I. The 2008 Ozone NAAQS and Emission 

Inventory Requirements 

II. Wisconsin’s Emission Inventories 

A. Base Year 

B. How did the State develop the emission 

inventories? 

III. EPA’s Evaluation 

A. Did the State adequately document the 

derivation of the emission estimates? 

B. Did the State quality assure the emission 

estimates? 

C. Did the State provide for public review 

of the requested SIP revision? 

IV. Final Action 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. The 2008 Ozone NAAQS and 

Emission Inventory Requirements 

On March 12, 2008, EPA promulgated 

a revised 8-hour ozone NAAQS of 0.075 

parts per million (ppm). See 73 FR 

16436 (March 27, 2008). The Sheboygan 

and Kenosha areas were designated as 

marginal nonattainment areas for the 

2008 ozone NAAQS. See 77 FR 30088 

(May 21, 2012) and 77 FR 34221 (June 

11, 2012). The Sheboygan area is 

Sheboygan County. The Kenosha area is 

the portion of Kenosha County bounded 

by the Illinois/Wisconsin border 

(Kenosha County border) on the south, 

Lake Michigan on the east, the Kenosha 

County/Racine County border on the 

north, and the Interstate 94 (I–94) 

corridor (including all of the I–94 

corridor) on the west. Both of these 

areas are classified as marginal 

nonattainment for the 2008 ozone 

standard. 

CAA sections 172(c)(3) and 182(a)(1), 

42 U.S.C. 7502(c)(3) and 7511a(a)(1), 

require states to develop and submit, as 

SIP revisions, emission inventories for 

all areas designated as nonattainment 

for the ozone NAAQS. An emission 

inventory for ozone is an estimation of 

actual emissions of air pollutants that 

contribute to the formation of ozone in 

an area. Ozone is a gas that is formed 

by the reaction of Volatile Organic 

Compounds (VOC) and Oxides of 

Nitrogen (NOX) in the atmosphere in the 

presence of sunlight. VOC and NOX are 

referred to as ozone precursors. 

Therefore, an emission inventory for 

ozone focuses on the emissions of VOC 

and NOX. VOC is emitted by many types 

of pollution sources, including power 

plants, industrial sources, on-road and 

off-road mobile sources, smaller 

stationary sources, collectively referred 

to as area sources, and biogenic 

sources.1 NOX is primarily emitted by 

combustion sources, both stationary and 

mobile. 

The emission inventories provide 

emissions data for a variety of air 

quality planning tasks, including 

establishing baseline emission levels for 

anthropogenic (manmade) emissions 

associated with ozone standard 

violations, calculating emission 

reduction targets needed to attain the 

NAAQS and achieving reasonable 

further progress toward attainment of 

the ozone standard (not required in the 

areas considered here), determining 

emission inputs for ozone air quality 

modeling analyses, and tracking 

emissions over time to determine 

progress toward achieving air quality 

and emission reduction goals. As stated 

above, the CAA requires the states to 

submit emission inventories for areas 

designated as nonattainment for ozone. 

For the 2008 ozone NAAQS, EPA has 

recommended that states submit typical 

summer day emission estimates for 2011 

(78 FR 34178, 34190, June 6, 2013). 

However, EPA also allows states to 

submit base year emissions for other 

years during a recent ozone standard 

violation period. States are required to 

submit estimates of VOC and NOX

emissions for four general classes of 

anthropogenic sources: Stationary point 

sources; area sources; on-road mobile 

sources; and off-road mobile sources. 

The base year emission inventories must 

be submitted for ozone nonattainment 

within two years after EPA designates 

nonattainment areas for a new ozone 

standard. 

II. Wisconsin’s Emission Inventories 

Tables 1 and 2 summarize the 2011 

VOC and NOX emissions in the 

Wisconsin ozone nonattainment areas 

for a typical summer day.2

TABLE 1—SHEBOYGAN COUNTY 2011 EMISSION INVENTORY

[Tons per day] 

Source type VOC NOX

Point ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2.63 11.73 

Area ......................................................................................................................................................................... 7.35 1.35 

On-Road Mobile ....................................................................................................................................................... 2.49 5.18 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 11675 

TABLE 1—SHEBOYGAN COUNTY 2011 EMISSION INVENTORY—Continued 

[Tons per day] 

Source type VOC NOX

Off-Road Mobile ....................................................................................................................................................... 4.36 3.26 

Totals ................................................................................................................................................................ 16.83 21.52 

TABLE 2—KENOSHA AREA 2011 EMISSION INVENTORY

[Tons per day] 

Source type VOC NOX

Point ......................................................................................................................................................................... 0.70 8.80 

Area ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4.78 1.09 

On-Road Mobile ....................................................................................................................................................... 2.14 4.67 

Off-Road Mobile ....................................................................................................................................................... 2.42 2.33 

Totals ................................................................................................................................................................ 10.04 16.89 

A. Base Year 

WDNR chose 2011 as the base year for 

these emission inventories, as 

recommended by EPA. 

B. How did the State develop the 

emission inventories? 

The point source NOX and VOC 

emissions were derived from facilityreported emissions for 2011. Wisconsin 

requires major source facilities to report 

emissions annually. WDNR used 

seasonal process-level source activity 

information contained in the annual 

emission reports along with emission 

control information to calculate both the 

summer day emissions and the annual 

emissions for each facility. The source 

location and emissions data contained 

in the facility emission reports were 

used to determine the emissions specific 

to the Sheboygan and Kenosha areas. 

The 2011 area source emissions were 

derived using the 2011 National 

Emissions Inventory (NEI), version 2, 

emission estimates for Sheboygan and 

Kenosha Counties. The area source 

emissions data have been derived for 

each appropriate Source Classification 

Code (SCC) covered by the NEI for 

Sheboygan and Kenosha Counties. The 

WDNR used various source surrogate 

data, such as population, land use data, 

and employment source sector or SCC, 

to allocate the area source emissions to 

the nonattainment portion of Kenosha 

County. The emission inventory 

documentation contained in Appendix 

5 of Wisconsin’s submittal includes 

documentation explaining how the 

emissions were derived for each area 

source type. 

On-road mobile source emissions 

were determined using EPA’s Motor 

Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES), 

version MOVES2010b, Vehicle Miles 

Traveled (VMT) and other vehicle classspecific data supplied by the 

Southeastern Wisconsin Regional 

Planning Commission (SEWRPC), the 

Bay-Lake Regional Planning 

Commission (BLRPC), the metropolitan 

planning organizations that cover the 

two ozone nonattainment areas, and the 

Wisconsin Department of 

Transportation. 

Non-road mobile source emissions 

were derived by dividing the various 

area source types into two groups: (1) 

Commercial marine vessels, aircraft, and 

railroads (collectively referred to as 

MAR); and (2) all other non-road source 

types. For the aircraft and railroad 

components of the MAR, the WDNR 

relied on the emissions for these source 

types contained in EPA’s 2011 NEI, 

version 1. For commercial marine vessel 

emissions, the WDNR used emissions 

derived by the Lake Michigan Air 

Directors Consortium (LADCO), but 

used the county-specific commercial 

marine vessel emissions in the 2011 NEI 

to allocate the LADCO-supplied 

commercial marine vessel emissions to 

the Sheboygan and Kenosha ozone 

nonattainment areas. For the non-MAR 

area source emissions, the WDNR used 

the National Mobile Inventory Model 

(NMIM) to generate annual and summer 

day NOX and VOC emissions for each 

non-road mobile source type. 

To quality assure (QA) and quality 

check (QC) the emission estimates, the 

WDNR developed a quality assurance 

plan. This plan was applied for each 

source category and source type to 

ensure accuracy, completeness, 

comparability, and representativeness of 

the estimated emissions. One of the 

major quality assurance procedures 

employed was the comparison of the 

calculated emissions to emissions data 

contained in the 2011 NEI. 

III. EPA’s Evaluation 

EPA has reviewed Wisconsin’s 

November 14, 2014, requested SIP 

revision for consistency with CAA and 

EPA emission inventory requirements. 

In particular, EPA has reviewed the 

techniques used by the WDNR to derive 

and quality assure the emission 

estimates. EPA has also determined 

whether Wisconsin has provided the 

public with the opportunity to review 

and comment on the development of the 

emission estimates and whether the 

State has addressed all public 

comments. 

A. Did the State adequately document 

the derivation of the emission 

estimates? 

The State documented the general 

procedures used to estimate the 

emissions for each of the major source 

types. The documentation of the 

emission estimation procedures is 

adequate for us to determine that 

Wisconsin followed acceptable 

procedures to estimate the emissions. 

B. Did the State quality assure the 

emission estimates? 

As noted above, WDNR developed a 

quality assurance plan and followed this 

plan during various phases of the 

emissions estimation and 

documentation process to QA and QC 

the emissions for completeness and 

accuracy. The quality assurance 

procedures have been determined to be 

adequate and acceptable. We conclude 

that Wisconsin has developed 

inventories of VOC and NOX emissions 

that are comprehensive and complete. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

11676 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

C. Did the State provide for public 

review of the requested SIP revision? 

WDNR notified the public of the 

opportunity for comment both in 

newspapers and on the WDNR Web site. 

A public hearing was held on 

September 25, 2014, and WDNR 

provided for the review of written 

comments received outside of the public 

hearing. The only comments received 

were those from EPA, and WDNR 

addressed those comments through 

revisions reflected in the final emission 

inventories and associated 

documentation. 

IV. Final Action 

We are approving a Wisconsin SIP 

revision submitted to address the ozonerelated emission inventory requirements 

for the Sheboygan and Kenosha areas for 

the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The emission 

inventories we are approving into the 

SIP are specified in Tables 1 and 2 

above. We are approving the emission 

inventories because they contain 

comprehensive, accurate, and current 

inventories of actual emissions for all 

relevant VOC and NOX sources in 

accordance with CAA sections 172(c)(3) 

and 182(a) and because Wisconsin 

adopted the emission inventories after 

providing for reasonable public notice 

and a public hearing. 

We are publishing this action without 

prior proposal because we view this as 

a noncontroversial amendment and 

anticipate no adverse comments. 

However, in the proposed rules section 

of this Federal Register publication, we 

are publishing a separate document that 

will serve as the proposal to approve the 

state plan if relevant adverse written 

comments are filed. This rule is 

effective on May 6, 2016 without further 

notice unless we receive relevant 

adverse written comments by April 6, 

2016. If we receive such comments, we 

will withdraw this action before the 

effective date by publishing a 

subsequent document withdrawing the 

final action. All public comments 

received will then be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on the 

proposed action. EPA will not institute 

a second comment period. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this action 

should do so at this time. Please note 

that if EPA receives adverse comment 

on an amendment, paragraph, or section 

of this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. If we do not receive 

any comments, this action will be 

effective May 6, 2016. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by May 6, 2016. Filing a petition 

for reconsideration by the Administrator 

of this final rule does not affect the 

finality of this action for the purposes of 

judicial review nor does it extend the 

time within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and it shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. Parties with objections to this 

direct final rule are encouraged to file a 

comment in response to the parallel 

notice of proposed rulemaking for this 

action published in the proposed rules 

section of today’s Federal Register, 

rather than file an immediate petition 

for judicial review of this direct final 

rule, so that EPA can withdraw this 

direct final rule and address the 

comment in the proposed rulemaking. 

This action may not be challenged later 

in proceedings to enforce its 

requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen 

dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: February 22, 2016. 

Robert A. Kaplan, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 11677 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 2. Section 52.2585 is amended by 

adding paragraph (dd) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.2585 Control strategy: Ozone. 

* * * * * 

(dd) On November 14, 2014, 

Wisconsin submitted 2011 volatile 

organic compounds and oxides of 

nitrogen emission inventories for the 

Sheboygan County and Wisconsin 

portion (Kenosha area) of the ChicagoNaperville, Illinois-Indiana-Wisconsin 

nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone 

national ambient air quality standard as 

a revision of the Wisconsin state 

implementation plan. The documented 

emission inventories are approved as a 

revision of the State’s implementation 

plan. 

[FR Doc. 2016–04897 Filed 3–4–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES