6560-50-P
**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52**  **[EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0082] Revisions to the California SIP, Ventura & Eastern Kern Air**  **Pollution Control Districts; Permit Exemptions**
**AGENCY:** Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
**ACTION:** Final rule.

**SUMMARY:** The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve revisions to the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) and Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District (EKAPCD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions clarify, update, and revise exemptions from New Source Review (NSR) permitting requirements, for various air pollution sources.

**DATE:** These rules will be effective on [ **Insert date 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register**  ].

**ADDRESSES:** EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2015- 0082 for this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-3901. While all documents in the docket are listed at http://www.regulations.gov , some information may be publicly2 available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi-volume reports), and some may not be available in either location (e.g., confidential business information (CBI)). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** section.
**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:** Lawrence Maurin, EPA Region IX, (415) 972-3943, Maurin.Lawrence@epa.gov

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:** Throughout this document, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to EPA. Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses III. EPA Action IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

**I. Proposed Action**  On April 14, 2015 (80 FR 19932), EPA proposed to approve the following rules into the California SIP. Table 1 lists the rules addressed by this proposal, including the dates they were revised by the local air agency and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).3

Table 1 - Submitted Rules Local Agency Rule # Rule Title Revision Date Submittal Date VCAPCD 23 Exemptions from Permit 11/12/13 05/13/14 EKAPCD 202 Permit Exemptions 01/13/11 06/21/11 We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they complied with the relevant Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements. Our proposed action contains more information on the rules and our evaluation. **II. Public Comments and EPA Responses** EPA’s proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments.

**III. EPA Action**  No comments were submitted. Therefore, as authorized in Section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving these rules into the California SIP.

**IV. Incorporation by Reference**  In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District and Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these4 documents available electronically through www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the

**ADDRESSES** section of this preamble for more information).

**V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews**  Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: • is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);5 • does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4); • does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on6 tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the **Federal Register**

. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the **Federal Register** . This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by [ **Insert date 60 days after date of publication in the Federal Register**  ]. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.7 This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)). **List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52** Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Incorporation by reference, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

____June 16, 2015.____ ____//signed by//___ Dated: Alexis Strauss, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.8 Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: **PART 52 APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS.** 1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
**AUTHORITY:** 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F – California 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(391) (i)(A)( 2 )and(c)(441)(i)(C)( 3 ) to read as follows: §52.220 Identification of plan.

* * * * * (c) * * * (391) * * * (i) * * * (A) * * * ( 2 ) Rule 202, “Permit Exemptions,” amended on January 13, 2011.

* * * * * (441) * * * (i) * * * (C) * * * ( 3 ) Rule 23, “Exemptions from Permit,” revised on November 12, 2013.

* * * * *