alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Honorable Ray LaHood, Secretary

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

RE: DOT-OST-2012-0083

Dear Secretary Lahood:

Please accept this letter of support for the application of Volaris to operate scheduled passenger service 

between Denver International Airport (“DEN”) and Mexico City’s Benito Juárez International Airport.

Vail Resorts is the premier operator of mountain resorts in the Western United States. In Colorado, we 

own and operate the Vail, Beaver Creek, Keystone and Breckenridge ski resorts. Mexico is one of the 

top international markets for those resorts, with strong visitation numbers throughout the winter, and 

an increasing number in the summer. Continued growth from the Mexican market can only occur with 

added airline capacity and the proposed service from Volaris gives us that opportunity.

Currently, we do not have year round nonstop service from Mexico City. This lack of consistent air 

service has prevented us from attracting more Mexican guests to our resorts. Volaris will help increase 

demand and awareness in the Mexican market and generate new revenue for our Colorado resorts and 

hotels.

Thank you for your consideration. We urge you to approve Volaris’ application to fly MEX-DEN.

Regards,

Bob Stinchcomb

Vice President of Business Development

Vail Resorts Inc.

bobst@vailresorts.com
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40333 Conference Calendar

__________________
ELLIS BURRELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus B. TORRES, Sergeant; S. DELGADO, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-94-CV-555

- - - - - - - - - - (October 19, 1995) Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ellis Burrell's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal from the magistrate judge's order denying his application for appointment of counsel in the district court is DENIED. The order of the magistrate judge is not appealable to this court.
See Trufant v. Autocon, Inc. , 729 F.2d 308, 309 (5th Cir. 1984). Burrell also seeks to appeal the denial of pauper status in the district court. However, review is not available because noNo. 95-40333 -2- order has been entered in the district court denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis in that court. On appeal Burrell can present no legal points arguable on their merits, and the appeal is frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). For this reason, the motions to supplement the record on appeal and to appoint counsel on appeal are also DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is
DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2. We caution Burrell that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Burrell is further cautioned to review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2013 - 1067 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM164AD

84 - 24 - 53 --- 5/11/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
Dear Administrator Jackson, 

Honey bees and other insect pollinators are dying off at unprecedented rates and pesticides are a clear 

causal factor. This cannot be allowed to continue, and you can do something about it. 

Your agency is considering an Emergency Citizen Petition right now that seeks suspension of the insecticide 

clothianidin, the petition filed with you on March 20 by 25 beekeepers and four consumer and 

environmental groups (EPA-HQ-OPP-20 12-0334). Applied to over a hundred million acres across the 

country, clothianidin has recently been confirmed as a highly toxic pesticide to which honey bees are 

exposed at potentially lethal rates throughout the corn planting season. Because clothianidin is persistent 

and systemic, bees and other pollinators also face ongoing sub-lethal exposures throughout the course of the 

year in a variety of other settings. 

Immediately at stake are the livelihoods of beekeepers upon whose daily work we rely to pollinate 

America's vital crops. Equally important, and more profound, is the fact that pollinators are keystone, 

indicator species - as they go, so goes the environment, and with it, us. 

Ms. Jackson, you can make the difference. Please recognize this is an emergency and suspend clothianidin's 

registration until your agency ensures compliance with the condition it imposed nine years ago. EPA said 

then that the registrant for clothianidin, Bayer Crop Science, had to provide an acceptable field study 

showing it would have not have unreasonable adverse effects on pollinators, yet Bayer has never produced a 

single scientifically valid field study supporting clothianidin's safety for pollinators. To date, your agency 

has let down the nation in allowing an unsafe and untested chemical to be released to market. But EPA has 

before it a very clear opportunity to take decisive action. 

The ongoing threat to America's honey bees is an emergency and an imminent hazard. Period. Americans 

are counting on you to make this right. 

Si erely, 

Randy Ham son 

405 1 Wagner St 

Eugene, OR 97402

I4N^72M

OFFICE OF TME

^XECUTıvE sEcRETARIAT
---

Exhibit 32.2

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Paul Chung, Chief Financial Officer and a
director of Geocom Resources Inc. (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Geocom Resources
      Inc. for the interim period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Geocom Resources Inc.                                                                               

Dated: December 7, 2007

|/s/ Paul Chung                                                       | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Paul Chung                                                           | 
|Chief Financial Officer and Director                                 | 
|(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer) | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Geocom Resources
Inc. and will be retained by Geocom Resources Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENTTS
OF OPERATIONS, BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       75,855
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      2,518
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          35,517
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  10,331
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 124,221
<COMMON>                                         1,214
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       39,374
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             14,774
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  55,362
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,446
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            20,907
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      917
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  45,589
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  124,221
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       73,955
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           (1,616)
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      68,196
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      66,580
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          5,759
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                            (16,225)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                (10,466)
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       (1,779)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,606)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         65
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                 (11,606)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         2,392
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          15,443
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.57)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Prentiss Properties Trust on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-38079, 333-49295,
333-49433, 333-60785, 333-65735, 333-65793, 333-72681, 333-80735 and 333-86797)
and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-20329 and 333-79623) of our reports dated (i)
February 9, 2000 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of
Prentiss Properties Trust and (ii) February 9, 2000 on our audit of the
financial statement schedule of Prentiss Properties Trust, which reports are
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to
our firm under the caption "Selected Financial and Operating Data."



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 17, 2000
Exhibit 99.1
   
 For Further Information, Contact:Chris A. Karkenny      or
    
    Michael E. PolgardyChief Financial Officer
    
    Treasurer949.639.4990
    
    949.639.435726220 Enterprise CourtLake Forest, California 92630Tel  949.639.2000
 APRIA HEALTHCARE GROUP INC. NOTIFIES THE NYSE OF SCHEDULED CLOSING DATE




---



##### 



About Apria Healthcare Group Inc.
  About The Blackstone Group
 www.blackstone.com
 Forward-Looking Statements




---



#####
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Sheffield Steel
Corporation (the Company) for the year ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies, except as disclosed in the Form 12b-25 file on or about the date hereof with respect to the Report, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: July 15, 2005



By:

/s/    James P. NolanJames P. NolanPresident and Chief Executive Officer




Date: July 15, 2005



By:

/s/    Stephen R. JohnsonStephen R. JohnsonVice President and Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2046
NATHANIEL GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LINQ INDUSTRIAL FABRICS, INCORPORATED; JORGE M. IGNARRA; MOSES SAMPSON; RALEIGH CREEL; TERRY HUGHES; SHARON POAPS; ROM REDDY; GEORGE MILLNER; SAM PARKER, JR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-96-2493-2-23-AJ) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 16, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathaniel Green, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Dennis Carrouth, JamesHenry Fowles, III, ELLZEY & BROOKS, L.L.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days withinwhich to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).The district court entered its order on April 29, 1997; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on August 4, 1997, which is beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leavesthis court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the Company) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James W. Morozzi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    JAMES W. MOROZZIName:

James W. MorozziTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

March 13, 2008
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-927

LT Case No. 2022-CF-569

_____________________________

CHARLES JASON DARNELL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County.

Jason Nimeth, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Natalie R. Gossett, 

Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marissa V. 

Giles, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

October 24, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, JAY, and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00146-CR

EX PARTE GARY DON TAYLOR

----------

FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. C-371-009717-1201358-A

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant is attempting to appeal from the court of criminal appeals’s 2013 

denial of his postconviction application for writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code 

Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West 2015). Appellant has not responded to this 

court’s May 14, 2015 letter questioning our jurisdiction over such an attempted 

appeal, nor have we found any authority allowing such an appeal. See, e.g., id.

§ 5 (“After conviction the procedure outlined in this Act shall be exclusive and any 

other proceeding shall be void and of no force and effect in discharging the 

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

prisoner.”); Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1991) (orig. proceeding) (holding that court of appeals usurped court of 

criminal appeals’s exclusive authority to grant habeas relief from final felony 

conviction); cf. Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d 115, 

117–18 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding) (contrasting court of appeals’s 

authority to rule on matters potentially related to forthcoming, but not pending, 

11.07 application with the court of criminal appeals’s exclusive jurisdiction to 

grant postconviction relief). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: July 30, 2015
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTEE
             April 15, 2009
    
    By /s/ Gary T. Wescombe
    
    Chairman of the TrusteesDate
    
    Gary T. Wescombe
#### Pinkey Sloan, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion filed Oct. 26, 1915.

1. The State may not impeach its own witness who gives no adverse testimony by reading excerpts from his testimony on a former hearing.

2. Where the question for the jury is the lawfulness of the homicide, the court should not assume in his charge that it was unlawful.

Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Orange County; Jas. W. Perkins, Judge.

Judgment reversed.

*Dickenson & Dickenson*and *Davis & Giles,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*T. F. West,*Attorney General, and *C. O. 'Andrews,*Assistant, for the State.

Cockrell, J.

Sloan was convicted of manslaughter, and, takes writ of error.

We find two substantial errors committed on the trial of this case.

The State was permitted over objections to ask its own witness, if on a former hearing he had not testified that Pinkey had it in for the deceased. The witness had testified negatively that he knew of no trouble existing between the accused and the deceased, and the State did not bring itself within the rule, as laid down in Adams *217v. State, 34 Fla. 185, 15 South. Rep. 905, for the impeachment of its own witness. The evidence was not admitted for the purpose of refreshing the memory of the witness, conceding the question elicited competent testimony, seeing that all that was adduced was the fact that the witness had on a former trial given certain testimony, and it was not even attempted to prove on this trial the truth or falsity of that testimony. It was neither a predicate for impeachment nor direct evidence, and should not have been admitted.

Other evidence of a similar character was admitted that was also objectionable, but it may well be doubted if it had any material influence upon the verdict.

The homicide was admitted and the sole question for the jury was the question of its lawfulness under the circumstances. The court therefore erred in its thirteenth instruction in the characterization of the homicide as unlawful. The use of the adjective unlawful, may have been an oversight, but such oversights should not occur. This case is readily distinguished from Presley v. State, 63 Fla. 37, 57 South. Rep. 605. There the court characterized the act committed as an “offense,” and no error was found; but the question there presented was whether the accused committed the act, and the instruction did not therefore intimate that the court thought the accused guilty of the crime charged.

For these errors the judgment is reversed.

Shackleford, Whitfield and Ellis, JJ., concur.

Taylor, C. J., absent on account of illness.
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.44




 


AMENDMENT TO LEASE







This Third Amendment to the Lease (the “Third Amendment”), made and effective this 1st day of October, 2011, between SB&G Properties, LC (“Landlord”) and Boomerang Sub, Inc. (“Tenant”), modifies and amends the monthly paid and accrued rent and term of this lease.







In consideration of the mutual promises and agreements exchanged, Lender and Borrower agree as follows:








	
  

	
1.

	
Current Accrued Rent Balance.  As of August 31, 2011, the amount of the accrued rent owed to Landlord  is  $206,045.













	 	
2.  

	
Monthly Rent.  The monthly rent shall remain $21,717.50













	 	
3.  

	
Monthly Paid Rent.  The monthly paid rent shall remain $7,000.







 









	 	
4.  

	
Monthly Accrued Rent. The monthly accrued rent shall remain $14,717.50.













	 	
5.  

	
Term.  The term for this amendment shall be and continue on a month-to-month basis from the last executed amendment.












Nothing in this Third Amendment shall be understood or construed to be a satisfaction or release in whole or in part of the lease.







In Witness Whereof, Lender and Borrower have executed this Agreement.








	
/s/ Gene Mulvihill

	  	
/s/ Joseph Bellantoni


	
SB&G Properties, LLC

	  	
Boomerang Sub, Inc.


	
Name: Gene Mulvihill

	  	
Joseph Bellantoni


	
Title:  Managing Member

	  	
   Chief Financial Officer







 




	
MULTISTATE LOAN MODIFICATION AGREEMENT (To a Fixed Interest Rate)—Single Family—Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT

	
Form 5161


	
3/04

	
(page  of 1 pages)