Instructions for filling the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data fro

fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not 

supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in t

if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. Constituents of concern are: Car

Monoxide, Formaldehyde, Methane, Speciated Volatile Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs), Speciated Semi

HAPs, Sulfer Dioxide, Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, Hydrogen Cyanide, Nitrogen Oxides, Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), 

Suspended Solids (TSS). You must complete 3 separate sampling events for each of the requested constituents. 

spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled b

separate copies of this spreadsheet. Fields shaded in yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in light gree

populated using drop-down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically po

from the Boiler Information worksheet. Please Do Not modify the structure of this spreadsheet by adding or su

rows, columns, cells. Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: 

[FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information wo

2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family requred for this analysis. 

spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission 

results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constiuent or co

family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter bot

Hg+2, or if the Ontario-Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg0, HgP, and Hg

Specieated Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi-Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

provided in the Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results f

General instructions follow for these worksheets:

Boiler Operation Information

1. Please determine which units of measure (acfm or dscfm) were used for Exhaust Flow Rate and which units o

(deg C or deg F) were used for Exhaust Temperature. Fill these units of measure into the Units of Measure field.

2. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of the 3 sample testing periods in the Sample 

2, and Sample 3 fields.

3. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

Fuel Information

1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop-downs in the Fuel Type Selection 

You may enter up to 4 fuel types. Then, enter the input rate of each fuel in the Sample 1, Sample 2, and Sample 

If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of 
If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of 

2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided.

3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate.

4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information fie

Emission Data

1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each of the 3 samples in two different units of measure

others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds p

BTU) and ppmvd @ 7% O2 (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to prov

2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used 

Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010).

3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information fie
nformation about emission data from fossil 

ses where the test methods are not currently 

nly be used if the method is not in the ERT or 

T. Constituents of concern are: Carbon 

ants (HAPs), Speciated Semi-Volatile Organic 

Oxides, Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), and Total 

each of the requested constituents. This 

multiple boilers should be handled by using 

All cells that are shaded in light green are 

in gray, as they are automatically populated 

 of this spreadsheet by adding or subtracting 

wing naming convention: 

misTestMethods.xls).

boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet. 

ent family requred for this analysis. On each 

fuel input information, and emission test 

d depending on the constiuent or constituent 

Mercury requires that you enter both Hg0 and 

, and Hg+2. However, both the 

orksheets allow you to use a drop-down 

ord each HAP that you have results for. 

xhaust Flow Rate and which units of measure 

ure into the Units of Measure field.

mple testing periods in the Sample 1, Sample 

er Supporting Information field.

downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. 

he Sample 1, Sample 2, and Sample 3 fields. 

samples, then enter an input rate of zero. 
samples, then enter an input rate of zero. 

he Other Supporting Information field.

es in two different units of measure, while 

f measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million 

nt oxygen)), you are required to provide both.

mple given in the Test Method Used field. 

ethod (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010).

he Other Supporting Information field.
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

8223 Springerville Generating Station 3
Control Device Configuraton

Listed (by boiler) in Question 16 (page 17) of the questionnaire
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

8223 Springerville Generating Station 3

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

Date of Testing

Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr)

Basis (Wet/Dry)

Exhaust Steam % Moisture

Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm)

Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection

Fuel Input Rate

Sample 1

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 2

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 3

bituminous

Emission Test Results

CO Emission Rate 

Sample 1 

(lb/MMBtu)

CO Emission Rate 

Sample 1 

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

CO Emission Rate 

Sample 2 

(lb/MMBtu)
Unit of Measure

Other Supporting 

Information

1000 lb/hr

MMBtu/hr

N/A

%

Unit of Measure

Fuel Flow 

Measurement 

Method

Other Supporting 

Information

lb/hour Other Facility DMS

CO Emission Rate 

Sample 2 

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

CO Emission Rate 

Sample 3 

(lb/MMBtu)

CO Emission Rate 

Sample 3 

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

Test Method Used 

(ex. U.S. EPA

Method 10A)

Other Supporting 

Information
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

8223 Springerville Generating Station 3

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2

Date of Testing 2/27/2010 2/27/2010

Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) 3857.366667 3846.966667

Basis (Wet/Dry) Wet Wet

Exhaust Steam % Moisture

Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) 829805.4 829502.7944

Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F) 201.2 200.8666667

Fuel Type Selection

Fuel Input Rate

Sample 1

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 2

subbituminous 448770 450152.2

Emission Test Results

Methane Emission Rate 

Sample 1

 (lb/MMBtu)

Methane Emission Rate 

Sample 1

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

2.2769E-05 3.7264E-02
Sample 3 Unit of Measure

Other Supporting 

Information

2/27/2010

1000 lb/hr No data available

3822.533333 MMBtu/hr Facility process data

Wet N/A

% No data available

834323.25 dscfm Calculated from Facility DMS

200.5333333 deg F Facility process data

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 3 Unit of Measure

Fuel Flow Measurement 

Method

Other Supporting 

Information

449310.0333 lb/hour Other Facility DMS

Methane Emission Rate 

Sample 2 

(lb/MMBtu)

Methane Emission Rate 

Sample 2 

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

Methane Emission Rate 

Sample 3 

(lb/MMBtu)

Methane Emission Rate 

Sample 3 

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

8.9566E-06 1.4658E-02 8.9722E-06 1.4684E-02
Test Method Used

(ex. U.S. EPA

Method 18)

Other Supporting 

Information

U.S. EPA Method 18 0.04,0.01,0.01,ADL,Zero gas standards were analyzed with results ranging from 0.010 to 0.013 ppmv an
ging from 0.010 to 0.013 ppmv and average run concentrations ranged from 0.014 to 0.058 ppmv. The analyte may not actually be present 
y not actually be present in the samples.
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

8223 Springerville Generating Station 3

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2

Date of Testing 2/27/2010 2/27/2010

Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) 3757.533333 3776.9

Basis (Wet/Dry) Wet Wet

Exhaust Steam % Moisture

Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) 824381.85 829622.3833

Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F) 201.2 202.7

Fuel Type Selection

Fuel Input Rate

Sample 1

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 2

subbituminous 446408.9 451014.4333

Emission Test Results

Total Vapor Phase 

Mercury Emission Rate 

Sample 1

 (lb/MMBtu)

Total Vapor Phase 

Mercury Emission Rate 

Sample 2 

(lb/MMBtu)

2.97039E-06 3.16442E-06
Sample 3 Unit of Measure

Other Supporting 

Information

2/27/2010

1000 lb/hr No data available

3729.3 MMBtu/hr Facility process data

Wet N/A

% No data available

822114.7667 dscfm Calculated from Facility DMS

203.6333333 deg F Facility process data

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 3 Unit of Measure

Fuel Flow Measurement 

Method

Other Supporting 

Information

448160 lb/hour Other Facility DMS

Total Vapor Phase 

Mercury Emission Rate 

Sample 3 

(lb/MMBtu)

Test Method Used

(ex. U.S. EPA Method 

30B)

Other Supporting 

Information

3.17897E-06 U.S. EPA Method 30B 147.45,194.2,187.15,ADL,
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

8223 Springerville Generating Station 3

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2

Date of Testing

Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr)

Basis (Wet/Dry)

Exhaust Steam % Moisture

Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm)

Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection

Fuel Input Rate

Sample 1

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 2

Emission Test Results Constituent

Consitutent Emission Rate 

Sample 1

 (%)

O2

CO2
Sample 3 Unit of Measure

Other Supporting 

Information

1000 lb/hr

MMBtu/hr

N/A

%

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 3 Unit of Measure

Fuel Flow 

Measurement Method

Other Supporting 

Information

Consitutent Emission Rate 

Sample 2 

(%)

Consitutent Emission Rate 

Sample 3 

(%)

Test Method Used

(ex. U.S. EPA Method 

3B)

Other Supporting 

Information
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

8223 Springerville Generating Station 3

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2

Date of Testing 5/10/2010 5/10/2010

Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) 3914.783333 3796.361538

Basis (Wet/Dry) Wet Wet

Exhaust Steam % Moisture

Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) 845461.2 828792.3

Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F) 205.9 207.4

Fuel Type Selection

Fuel Input Rate

Sample 1

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 2

subbituminous 445770.8417 433096.4154

Emission Test Results

Hydroden Cyanide 

Emission Rate Sample 1

 (lb/MMBtu)

Hydroden Cyanide 

Emission Rate Sample 1

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

1.1587E-03 1.1240
Sample 3 Unit of Measure

Other Supporting 

Information

5/10/2010

1000 lb/hr No data available

3834.2 MMBtu/hr Facility process data

Wet N/A

% No data available

838967.7 dscfm Calculated from Facility DMS

207.3 Facility process data

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 3 Unit of Measure

Fuel Flow Measurement 

Method

441976.9154 lb/hour Other

Hydroden Cyanide 

Emission Rate Sample 2 

(lb/MMBtu)

Hydroden Cyanide 

Emission Rate Sample 2 

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

Hydroden Cyanide 

Emission Rate Sample 3 

(lb/MMBtu)

1.4645E-03 1.4206 7.6275E-04
Other Supporting 

Information

Facility DMS

Hydroden Cyanide 

Emission Rate Sample 3 

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

Test Method Used

(ex. U.S. EPA

Method 18)

Other Supporting 

Information

0.7399 U.S. EPA Method 320 1.0989,1.343,0.6944,ADL
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

8223 Springerville Generating Station 3

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2

Date of Testing 5/10/2010 5/10/2010

Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) 3914.783333 3796.361538

Basis (Wet/Dry) Wet Wet

Exhaust Steam % Moisture

Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) 845461.2 828792.3

Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F) 205.9 207.4

Fuel Type Selection

Fuel Input Rate

Sample 1

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 2

subbituminous 445770.8417 433096.4154

Emission Test Results

Hydroden Chloride 

Emission Rate Sample 1

 (lb/MMBtu)

Hydroden Chloride 

Emission Rate Sample 1

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

8.5788E-04 0.6156
Sample 3 Unit of Measure

Other Supporting 

Information

5/10/2010

1000 lb/hr No data available

3834.2 MMBtu/hr Facility process data

Wet N/A

% No data available

838967.7 dscfm Calculated from Facility DMS

207.3 Facility process data

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 3 Unit of Measure

Fuel Flow Measurement 

Method

441976.9154 lb/hour Other

Hydroden Chloride 

Emission Rate Sample 2 

(lb/MMBtu)

Hydroden Chloride 

Emission Rate Sample 2 

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

Hydroden Chloride 

Emission Rate Sample 3 

(lb/MMBtu)

2.9482E-05 0.0212 3.0566E-05
Other Supporting 

Information

Facility DMS

Hydroden Chloride 

Emission Rate Sample 3 

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

Test Method Used

(ex. U.S. EPA

Method 18)

Other Supporting 

Information

0.0219 U.S. EPA Method 320 0.602,[<0.02],0.021,DLL
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

8223 Springerville Generating Station 3

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2

Date of Testing 5/10/2010 5/10/2010

Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) 3914.783333 3796.361538

Basis (Wet/Dry) Wet Wet

Exhaust Steam % Moisture

Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm) 845461.2 828792.3

Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F) 205.9 207.4

Fuel Type Selection

Fuel Input Rate

Sample 1

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 2

subbituminous 445770.8417 433096.4154

Emission Test Results

Hydroden Floride 

Emission Rate Sample 1

 (lb/MMBtu)

Hydroden Floride 

Emission Rate Sample 1

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

0.00017522 0.229463695
Sample 3 Unit of Measure

Other Supporting 

Information

5/10/2010

1000 lb/hr No data available

3834.2 MMBtu/hr Facility process data

Wet N/A

% No data available

838967.7 dscfm Calculated from Facility DMS

207.3 Facility process data

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 3 Unit of Measure

Fuel Flow Measurement 

Method

441976.9154 lb/hour Other

Hydroden Floride 

Emission Rate Sample 2 

(lb/MMBtu)

Hydroden Floride 

Emission Rate Sample 2 

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

Hydroden Floride 

Emission Rate Sample 3 

(lb/MMBtu)

0.0002044 0.267676152 0.000242905
Other Supporting 

Information

Facility DMS

Hydroden Floride 

Emission Rate Sample 3 

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

Test Method Used

(ex. U.S. EPA

Method 18)

Other Supporting 

Information

0.318102323 U.S. EPA Method 320 0.2243,0.2531,0.2986,ADL
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

8223 Springerville Generating Station 3

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2

Date of Testing

Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr)

Basis (Wet/Dry)

Exhaust Steam % Moisture

Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm)

Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection

Fuel Input Rate

Sample 1

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 2

Emission Test Results Constituent

Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate 

Sample 1 

(lb/MMBtu)

NO

NO2
Sample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr

MMBtu/hr

N/A

%

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Method

Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate 

Sample 1

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate 

Sample 2 

(lb/MMBtu)

Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate 

Sample 2

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)
Other Supporting Information

Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate 

Sample 3 

(lb/MMBtu)

Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate 

Sample 3

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

Test Method Used

(ex. U.S. EPA Method 7)
Other Supporting 

Information
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

8223 Springerville Generating Station 3

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2

Date of Testing

Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr)

Basis (Wet/Dry)

Exhaust Steam % Moisture

Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm)

Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection

Fuel Input Rate

Sample 1

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 2

Emission Test Results Constituent

Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rate 

Sample 1 

(lb/MMBtu)

SO2
Sample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr

MMBtu/hr

N/A

%

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Method

Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rate 

Sample 1

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rate 

Sample 2 

(lb/MMBtu)

Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rate 

Sample 2

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)
Other Supporting Information

Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rate 

Sample 3 

(lb/MMBtu)

Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rate 

Sample 3

(ppmvd @ 7% O2)

Test Method Used

(ex. U.S. EPA Method 7)
Other Supporting 

Information
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

8223 Springerville Generating Station 3

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2

Date of Testing

Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr)

Basis (Wet/Dry)

Exhaust Steam % Moisture

Exhaust Flow Rate (acfm or dscfm)

Exhaust Temperature (deg C or deg F)

Fuel Type Selection

Fuel Input Rate

Sample 1

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 2

Emission Test Results Constituent

Constituent Emission 

Rate Sample 1 

(mg solids/liter)

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)

Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
Sample 3 Unit of Measure

1000 lb/hr

MMBtu/hr

N/A

%

Fuel Input Rate 

Sample 3 Unit of Measure

Constituent Emission Rate 

Sample 2 

(mg solids/liter)

Constituent Emission Rate 

Sample 3 

(mg solids/liter)
Other Supporting Information

Fuel Flow Measurement Method

Test Method Used

(ex. Standard Test Method for Filterable and Nonfilterable Matter in Water ASTM 

D5907)
Other Supporting 

Information

Other Supporting 

Information