alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Koyo Victorien WAWA; Emma Gouhounou Wawa, Petitioners, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 02-1636.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 4, 2002.

Decided Jan. 24, 2003.

Randall L. Johnson, Johnson & Associates, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioners. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Christopher C. Fuller, Senior Litigation, Brenda M. O’Malley, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department Of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Koyo Victorien Wawa and Emma Gouh-ounou Wawa seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) decision and order denying their motion for reconsideration of its previous denial of their motion to reopen immigration proceedings. *151Our review of the record discloses that the Board properly denied the motion for reconsideration and that this petition is without merit. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. *See Wawa v. INS,*Nos. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ]; [ AXX-XXX-XXX ] (B.I.A. May 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Tiao-Tsan Lai and Yun-Yi Tseng hereby jointly certify as
follows:

     (a)  They are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer,
          respectively, of City Network, Inc. (the "Company");

     (b)  To the best of their knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
          10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") complies
          in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (c)  To the best of their knowledge, based upon a review of the Report, the
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company for the period certified.



Date: January 27, 2006                    By: /s/ Tiao-Tsan Lai
                                              -----------------------------
                                              Tiao-Tsan Lai
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)




Date: January 27, 2006                    By: /s/ Yun-Yi Tseng
                                              -----------------------------
                                              Yun-Yi Tseng
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statements of
SUSA Partnership,  L.P. (the  "Partnership")  on Forms S-3 (File Nos.  333-3344,
333-21991  and  333-44641),  of (1) our report  dated  February 3, 1999,  on our
audits  of  the  consolidated  financial  statements  of the  Partnership  as of
December  31, 1998 and 1997 and for each of the three years in the period  ended
December  31,  1998,   which  report  is   incorporated   by  reference  in  the
Partnership's  1998 Form 10-K and (2) our report dated  February 3, 1999, on the
financial  statement  schedule of the Partnership as of December 31, 1998, which
report is incorporated by reference in the Partnership's 1998 Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Baltimore, Maryland
March 31, 1999
#### Danny MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RED ONION STATE PRISON; Commonwealth of Virginia, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-7900.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 2003.

Decided Feb. 13, 2003.

Danny Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Ap-pellees.

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Danny Mitchell seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on September 11, 2002. The notice of appeal was filed on December 6, 2002. Because Mitchell failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7862

KHAYR ROOKS,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

EDDIE L. PEARSON, Warden at Sussex I State Prison,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:13-cv-00543-CMH-TRJ)

Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 19, 2015

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Khayr Rooks, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Stallard, Assistant 

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Khayr Rooks seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Rooks has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                            D&E Communications, Inc.

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                             as of December 31, 2001

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following is a listing of all subsidiaries of the Registrant, the state of
incorporation of each, and the names under which subsidiaries do business.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         State of                   Doing Business
       Subsidiary                      Incorporation                Under Name of
       ----------                      -------------                -------------
<S>                                    <C>                      <C>
Denver and Ephrata Telephone
     and Telegraph Company             Pennsylvania             D&E Telephone Company

D&E Networks, Inc.                     Pennsylvania             D&E Networks, Inc.
                                                                D&E Telestore
                                                                D&E Computer Networking
                                                                     Services

D&E Wireless, Inc.                     Pennsylvania             D&E Wireless, Inc.

D&E Investments, Inc.                  Nevada                   D&E Investments, Inc.

PCS Licenses, Inc.                     Nevada                   PCS Licenses, Inc.

D&E Systems, Inc.                      Delaware                 D&E Systems, Inc.
                                                                D&E Communications
                                                                D&E Long Distance

D&E Management Services, Inc.          Nevada                   D&E Management Services, Inc.

D&E Ventures, Inc.                     Pennsylvania             D&E Ventures, Inc.

D&E Acquisition Corp.                  Pennsylvania             D&E Acquisition Corp.

AFFILIATES

D&E/Omnipoint Wireless
    Joint Venture, L.P.                Delaware

EuroTel, L.L.C.                        Nebraska

PenneCom B.V.                          Netherlands

Pilicka Telephone                      Poland

EuroTel II, L.L.C.                     Nebraska

PenneCom I C.V.                        Netherlands

PenneCom II C.V.                       Netherlands
</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00127

- CR

EX PARTE Leonardo NUNCIO

From the County Court a t Law No

. 1, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017 CVJ 002365

- C1

Honorable Hugo Martinez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED April 10, 2019.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6164]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              FISCAL CLIFF

  (Mrs. DAVIS of California asked and was given permission to address 
the House for 1 minute.)
  Mrs. DAVIS of California. Mr. Speaker, last week the San Diego 
Chamber of Commerce sent its largest ever delegation of community and 
business leaders to Washington. They came because they know Washington 
can help them spur the economy, innovate, and employ local workers if 
we can all get on the same page.
  What grand request did they have for this Congress to help make 
progress happen? Well, just that we do our job: that we roll up our 
sleeves, work together across party lines, and find a sensible, not an 
arbitrary, balance of cuts and spending.
  Yes, Mr. Speaker, this country is facing some hard choices, and, yes, 
there is division in this Chamber, but we do not need to add to the 
serious challenges facing American businesses and families by sitting 
on the sidelines watching a completely manmade disaster explode upon 
our economy.
  Let's work together to come to decisions now. The American economy 
should not be facing a fiscal cliff; it should be receiving a fiscal 
roadmap. By actually doing our jobs, we can make the jobs of our 
hardworking constituents a little easier.
  Our job is not done, Mr. Speaker. Cancel the congressional recess.

                          ____________________
```
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-2564

___________

Debry Allyn La Near, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Missouri.

Frances R. Slay, Mayor for the *

City of St. Louis; Board of Police * [UNPUBLISHED]

Commissioners of the City of St. *

Louis; Christopher Goodson, Col.; *

JoAnn Freeman-Morrow, Col.; *

Michael J. Quinn, Col.; Julius *

Hunter, Col.; Amy Fiala, Sgt. *

(Sprout) Metropolitan Police Dept. *

for the City of St. Louis; John *

Gregory Stempf, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: October 2, 2009

Filed: October 28, 2009

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1

The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

-2-

Debry Allyn La Near appeals the district court1

 orders concluding that certain

claims in her civil action were time-barred under a five-year statute of limitations, and

denying her motions for appointed counsel. After carefully reviewing the record and

considering La Near’s arguments, we find no basis for reversal. See Phillips v. Jasper

County Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir. 2006) (denial of motion for appointed

counsel is reviewed for abuse of discretion); Eichenwald v. Small, 321 F.3d 733, 736

(8th Cir. 2003) (district court’s application of state’s statute of limitations is reviewed

de novo).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mission Broadcasting,
Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 9, 2005



/s/ DAVID S. SMITHDavid S. Smith President and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)




The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. The foregoing certification will
not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



26
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies(the “Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 3) of the Company for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2005, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Young  Ham                      |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| Young Ham,  Chief Financial Officer |
| August 4,  2006                     |

 

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6278]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. GIBSON:
        H.R. 6514.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the Constitution gives 
     Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign Nations, 
     and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.
```
EXHIBIT 10.3
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
COOPER INDUSTRIES, LTD.
AMENDED AND RESTATED
DIRECTORS STOCK PLAN
(November 4, 2008 Restatement)
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 RESOLVED,
 1.
    
    The following sentence shall be added at the end of Section 5.1 of the Stock
Plan:Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan, no Deferral Election may be made
with respect to any Stock Award with a Grant Date after January 2, 2009.2.
    
    Section 6.1 of the Stock Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as
follows:Each Restricted Stock Unit represents the right to receive one share of Common Stock
upon the Participant ceasing to serve on the Board for any reason (Restricted Stock
Unit). A Participant cannot exchange his or her Restricted Stock Units for shares of
Common Stock prior to such Participant ceasing to serve on the Board. The Company
shall maintain on behalf of each Participant an account and credit to the account any
Restricted Stock Units granted to such Participant. Restricted Stock Units shall
remain unvested while a Participant continues to serve on the Board. When a
Participant ceases his or her service on the Board for any reason, all unvested
Restricted Stock Units shall immediately vest as of the date of the Participants
Separation from Service.
  By:
    
    /s/ James P. Williams

James P. WilliamsSenior Vice PresidentHuman Resources
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 13 December 2006         

amending Decision 92/452/EEC as regards certain embryo collection and production teams in Canada, New Zealand and the United States of America

(notified under document number C(2006) 6441)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/925/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 89/556/EEC of 25 September 1989 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in and importation from third countries of embryos of domestic animals of the bovine species (1), and in particular Article 8(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 92/452/EEC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 302, 19.10.1989, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Commission Decision 2006/60/EC (OJ L 31, 3.2.2006, p. 24).

(2)OJ L 250, 29.8.1992, p. 40. Decision as last amended by Decision 2006/706/EC (OJ L 291, 21.10.2006, p. 40).

----

ANNEX

The Annex to Decision 92/452/EEC is amended as follows:

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 13 (Friday, January 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 3700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00931]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail, USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] & 
Parcel Select Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 8, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail, USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] & Parcel 
Select Contract 3 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available 
at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-161, CP2024-167.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-00931 Filed 1-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 99-2352

IN RE: CARL E. BAYLIS,

Debtor,

CONSTANCE B. RUTANEN; ELLA QUEVILLON, BY AND FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT

S. QUEVILLON; THERESA J. ALEXANDER,

Plaintiffs, Appellees,

v.

CARL E. BAYLIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE

ANTONIA QUEVILLON TRUST,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Nathaniel M. Gorton, U.S. District Judge]

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on July 6, 2000, is amended

as follows:

Page 5, line 15: “fulfilling” should be replaced with “breaching”.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date
of report (Date of earliest event reported): February 11, 2009
 Shopoff Properties Trust, Inc.
 
  Maryland
 
 333-139042
    
    20-5882165(Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)
 8951 Research Drive, Irvine, California
    
    92618(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (877) 874-7348
 
 Not applicable
 
 see
 o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---





TABLE OF CONTENTS




|                                                                                                                |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|5.02 (b) Departure of Directors or Principal Officers, Election of Directors, Appointment of Principal Officers
|SIGNATURE                                                                                                      



---



##### Table of Contents






5.02 (b)
Departure of Directors or Principal Officers, Election of Directors,
Appointment of Principal Officers




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURE
  SHOPOFF PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.Date:
February 17, 2009By:
    
    /s/ William A. Shopoff

William A. ShopoffPresident, Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors