alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 2929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00943]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m. EST, Monday, January 22, 2024.

PLACE: CFTC Headquarters Conference Center, Three Lafayette Centre, 
1155 21st Street NW, Washington, DC.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission 
(``Commission'' or ``CFTC'') will hold this meeting to consider the 
following matters:
    <bullet> Notice of Proposed Order and Request for Comment on an 
Application for a Capital Comparability Determination Submitted on 
behalf of Nonbank Swap Dealers subject to Capital and Financial 
Reporting Requirements of the United Kingdom and Regulated by the 
United Kingdom Prudential Regulation Authority;
    <bullet> LCH SA Request for Exemption from Regulation 1.49(d)(3) to 
Hold Customer Funds at the Banque de France; and
    <bullet> Proposed Rule: Requirements for Designated Contract 
Markets and Swap Execution Facilities Regarding Governance and the 
Mitigation of Conflicts of Interest Impacting Market Regulation 
Functions.
    The agenda for this meeting will be available to the public and 
posted on the Commission's website at https://www.cftc.gov. Members of 
the public are free to attend the meeting in person, or have the option 
to listen by phone or view a live stream. Instructions for listening to 
the meeting by phone and connecting to the live video stream will be 
posted on the Commission's website.
    In the event that the time, date, or place of this meeting changes, 
an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, or place 
of the meeting, will be posted on the Commission's website.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Christopher Kirkpatrick, Secretary 
of the Commission, 202-418-5964.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

    Dated: January 12, 2024.
Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-00943 Filed 1-12-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
chatching_ex43.htm


EXHIBIT 4.3


 


ChatChing Inc.







Employee/Consultant Benefit Plan







Amendment to plan dated December 15, 2011







 


Section 12 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read:







12. Amendment of the Plan. The Board of Directors may at any time modify or amend the Plan in any respect; provided, however, any such amendments may not adversely affect then-existing interests or expectations of then-existing Consultants or other participants.  The Board  will give reasonable notice of any such modification or amendment to Qualified Consultants through the Site. The Plan may only be modified in writing as set forth in this Section.  In order to assure any such amendments not adversely affect then-existing interests or expectations of then-existing Consultants or other participants, the Board of Director’s power to amend the Plan is limited as follows:  No amendment to the Plan will be applied retrospectively to any then-existing Consultants or other participants under the Plan prior to the date of the adoption of an Amendment, except as such amendment may be necessary to clarify any ambiguous terms or conditions of the Plan and then only in a way that does not adversely affect then-existing interests or expectations of then-existing Consultants or other participants.  This provision may not be altered by further amendment by the Board.
# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

March 20, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00064

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.R.E.T. , et al children,

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar Co unty, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 02260 Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating appellant’s parental rights. The reporter’s record for this appeal was due to be filed on February 17, 2015. On February 26, 2015, this Court issued an order requiring the reporter’s record be filed on or before March 9. On February 27, 2015 the court report er , Kayleen Rivera

, filed a second notice of late reco rd seeking a 30

- day extension. Ms. Rivera was given another extension to March 13, 2015. Ms. Rivera fil ed the first volume of the reporter’s record on March 6, 2015. At this time, the full reporter’s record still has not been filed.

It is therefore ORDERED that Ms. Rivera file all remaining volumes of the reporter’s record in this court no later than March 27, 2015

. If the full reporter’s record is not received by such date, an order may issue directing Ms. Rivera to appear and show cause why she should not be held in contempt for failing to file the record.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justic e

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of March, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk o f Court
GILA 

### RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 1,2005 TO: Natural Resources StandingCommittee FROM: Patricia Mariella, ExecutiveDirector, DEQ 

### RE: Proposal for a TwoHour Work Session on the TIP or Presentations at NRC Meetings

Thank you for persevering with us through the final stages in the completion of the Tribal Implementation Plan for Air Quality (TIP). We have made presentationson the TIP in two districts, focusingon the openburning issues. The discussionshave been substantial and complicated. Part ofthe challenge seemsto be that many district residents would like to limit burning in residential areas, but they are very concerned about fire danger from weeds. They are particularly concerned because there do not seemto be any practical alternativesto burning weeds at this time. In this situation, it may not make sense to move forward now with any additional regulatoryrequirementsuntil alternativesways to get rid of weeds are in place. In addition, there are a few otherparts ofthe TIP that we have not been ableto specifically go over with you, particularly in the 'area source' sections. At the NRC meeting before the DEQ went out for public comment on the TIP, several Committee members suggested that we try to have 

### a smaller scale work sessiondwing the public comment period, The DEQ Air Team would be glad to work with you to set up 

### a shorterwork session. But we would also be willing to go over materials duringyour regular meetings in June. The Public Hearing on the TIP is scheduled for June 22 in District 4. The Public Comment period ends July 1,2005. Ifyou feel it makes senseto have a work session, would it be possibleto have a two hour work session onJune 23 or 24 (Thursday or Friday)? Are there other dates that work better? Or would it be more efficient to 

### try to go over issues duringthe regular NRC meetings? We would like to talk about these options at your upcoming meeting.Page 1of 

### 1

Janet 

### Travis From: "Patricia Mariella" <Patricia.MarieIla@gric.nsn.us> To: "Daniel Blair (E-mail)" <air@gilanet.net,: "janet travis (E-mail)" <jtravis@gilanet.net>; "Leroy Williams (E-mail)" <williams@gilanet.net>; "Margaret Cook (E-mail)" <Margaret.Cook@gric.nsn.us>; "Russell Betsuie (E-mail)" <Rbetsuie@gilanet.net>; 'Willard Antone (E-mail)" <wantone3@gilanet.net> Sent: Thursday, June 16,2005 3: 19 PM Subject: TIP packageto Patrick McMullenof John McCain's staff Team, For the administrative record, Annie sent a package to Patrick McMullen of John McCain's staff ofthe TIP notebook (Clean Air for Good Health). I also sent him information on JATAP (blueprint outline, joint proposal from last year) because he was very interested in teh project when 

### I talked with him last month. 

### I also senthim our air quality monitoring brochure, our GRIC DEQ latest brochure. Thanks Pat Mariella
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Proxy
Statement/Prospectus constituting part of this Registration Statement on Form
S-4 of Nellcor Puritan Bennett Incorporated of our report dated July 31, 1996,
which appears on page 47 of the Nellcor Puritan Bennett Incorporated 1996 Annual
Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated by reference in its Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended July 7, 1996. We also consent to the reference
to us under the heading "Experts" in such Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
 
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
 
San Francisco, California
October 23, 1996
#### Dwayne MAYNARD; Tajuana Maynard, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WESTPORT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant & Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and Bridgette Harris-Smith; Smith & Jefferson, LLC, Third Party Defendants.

No. 02-1956.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 23, 2003.

Decided Feb. 10, 2003.

*668Stewart A. Sutton, Law Office of Stewart A. Sutton, L.L.C., Germantown, Maryland, for Appellants. Bryan G. Schumann, R. J., Smyk, Bollinger, Ruberry & Garvey, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Dwayne and Tajuana Maynard appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion for summary judgment, granting Westport Insurance Corporation’s cross motion for summary judgment, and declaring that Westport is not obligated to indemnify their former counsel, Bridgette Harris-Smith, for a $272,000 default judgment entered against her in favor of the Maynards for her legal malpractice in a bankruptcy proceeding.

This Court reviews de novo a district court’s order granting summary judgment and views the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. *Scheduled Airlines Traffic Offices, Inc. v. Objective, Inc.,*180 F.3d 583, 590-91 (4th Cir.1999). Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). We conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment and declaratory relief for the reason stated in its comprehensive opinion and orders and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Maynard v. Westport Ins. Corp.,*No. CA-01-232-DKC (D.Md. July 3 and Aug. 15, 2002).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

      ( print page 4358)    

# FEDERAL CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

Publishing in the FR of 1/22/24.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

Wednesday, January 24, 2024, at 10:00 a.m.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

The Open Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, January 24, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. has been changed to Wednesday, January 24, 2024 at 9:15 a.m.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: January 19, 2024.

Vanessa A. Countryman, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-01346 Filed 1-19-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000376

04-AUG-2016

08:08 AM
Page 1 of 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 21 - 272 COREY ALAN RUBIN and DON HAUTH, Plaintiff s/Appellees,

- vs BRENT E. HUGHES and GRACE HUGHES, husband and wife,

Defendants/Appellants . **ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED**  **MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE**  **OPENING BRIEF** Appellants Brent E. Hughes and Grace Hughes having filed an Unopposed Motion fo r Extension of T ime to File Opening Brief, and good cause appearing therefor; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellan ts ’ Opening Brief shall be filed on or before Septe mber 29, 2021 . DATED this ______ day of August, 20 21 .

_ _____________________________

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court August 18 2021

08/18/2021
Case Number: DA 21-0272
----

----

I Besluiten op grond van het EG- en het Euratom-Verdrag waarvan publicatie verplicht is

VERORDENINGEN

----

VERORDENING (EG) Nr. 5/2007 VAN DE COMMISSIE

van 5 januari 2007

tot vaststelling van forfaitaire invoerwaarden voor de bepaling van de invoerprijzen van bepaalde soorten groenten en fruit

DE COMMISSIE VAN DE EUROPESE GEMEENSCHAPPEN,

Gelet op het Verdrag tot oprichting van de Europese Gemeenschap,

Gelet op Verordening (EG) nr. 3223/94 van de Commissie van 21 december 1994 houdende uitvoeringsbepalingen van de invoerregeling voor groenten en fruit (1), en met name op artikel 4, lid 1,

Overwegende hetgeen volgt:

HEEFT DE VOLGENDE VERORDENING VASTGESTELD:

Artikel 1

De in artikel 4 van Verordening (EG) nr. 3223/94 bedoelde forfaitaire invoerwaarden worden vastgesteld zoals aangegeven in de tabel in de bijlage bij deze verordening.

Artikel 2

Deze verordening treedt in werking op 6 januari 2007.

Deze verordening is verbindend in al haar onderdelen en is rechtstreeks toepasselijk in elke lidstaat.

Gedaan te Brussel, 5 januari 2007.

Voor de Commissie

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Directeur-generaal Landbouw en plattelandsontwikkeling

----

(1)PB L 337 van 24.12.1994, blz. 66. Verordening laatstelijk gewijzigd bij Verordening (EG) nr. 386/2005 (PB L 62 van 9.3.2005, blz. 3).

----

BIJLAGE

bij de verordening van de Commissie van 5 januari 2007 tot vaststelling van forfaitaire invoerwaarden voor de bepaling van de invoerprijzen van bepaalde soorten groenten en fruit

----

(1)  Landennomenclatuur vastgesteld bij Verordening (EG) nr. 1833/2006 van de Commissie (PB L 354 van 14.12.2006, blz. 19). De code „ZZ” staat voor „andere oorsprong”.

----
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of
Mission Broadcasting, Inc., hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 28, 2003



|
|
|
|
|



The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 of
D&E Communications, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James W. Morozzi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    JAMES W.
MOROZZIName:

James W. MorozziTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

March 12, 2009
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not prece dent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

1 Loza v. Apfel , 219 F.3d 378, 394 (5th Cir. 2000).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50474

Summary Calendar

BILL E WRIGHT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

A-99-CV-808-AA

January 2, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Bill E. Wright appeals from the district court’ s judgment

affirming the denial of his application for disabil ity insurance

benefits. In order to be eligible, Wright must demonstrate that

the onset of a qualifying medical impairment was on or before

December 31, 1990, the date he was last insured. 12 Id. at 389.

3 Bowling v. Shalala

, 36 F.3d 431, 435 (5th Cir. 1994) (quoting Harrell v.

Bowen , 862 F.2d 471, 475 (5th Cir. 1988)).

2 Our review of the record shows that the ALJ’s decision that

Wright did not suffer a qualifying medical impairment as of

D ecember 31, 1990 is supported by substantial evidence on the

record as a whole and was reached through the application of proper

legal standards. 2 While Wright contends that the ALJ erred by not

applying the full five-step sequent ial analysis for determining

whether a claimant is disabled, this contention is without merit.

The ALJ found that Wright did not have a “severe impairment,” and

therefore did not satisfy step two of the five-step analysis, which

is dispositive as to the question of whether Wright was disabled.

“A finding that a claimant is disabled or not disabled at any point

in the five-step process is conclusive and terminates the

Secretary’s analysis.” 3

AFFIRMED.
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Application of

JET AVIATION FLIGHT SERVICES, INC.

for a certificate of public convenience and necessity under

49 U.S.C. 41102 to engage in foreign charter air 

transportation

DOCKET DOT-OST-2014-

0098

SUPPLEMENT NO. 2

TO APPLICATION OF

JET AVIATION FLIGHT SERVICES, INC.

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

Valerie Fattoross

Sales Contracts Administrator

JET AVIATION FLIGHT SERVICES, 

INC.

112 Charles Lindbergh Drive

Teterboro, New Jersey 07608

Phone: (201) 462-4066

Fax: (201) 462-4033

David C. Agee

Amanda E. Tummons

HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP

901 St. Louis Street, Suite 1800

Springfield, MO 65806

Phone: (417) 268-4000

Fax: (417) 268-4040

david.agee@huschblackwell.com

amanda.tummons@huschblackwell.com

Charles D. Nottingham

CHARLES D. NOTTINGHAM PLC

1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Suite 300

Washington, D.C. 20006

Phone: (202) 461-2229

Fax: (202) 580-6559

chip@chipnottingham.com

Counsel for Jet Aviation Flight Services, 

Inc.

March 10, 2015

SPH-2136284-1
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Application of

JET AVIATION FLIGHT SERVICES, INC.

for a certificate of public convenience and necessity under

49 U.S.C. 41102 to engage in foreign charter air 

transportation

DOCKET DOT-OST-2014-

0098

SUPPLEMENT NO. 2

TO APPLICATION OF

JET AVIATION FLIGHT SERVICES, INC.

On June 6, 2014, Jet Aviation Flight Services, Inc. (“JAFS”) submitted an 

application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing foreign

charter air transportation pursuant to section 41102 of Title 49 of the United States Code 

(“the Statute”). On July 31, 2014, the Department sent JAFS a letter requesting 

additional and/or clarifying information (the “Request”) and JAFS responded to such 

Request on August 29, 2014. Since such response was filed, there has been a change in 

management at JAFS. Accordingly, JAFS submitted additional information in support of 

its application in Docket DOT-OST-2014-0097 and such information is incorporated 

herein by reference pursuant to § 201.3 of the Department’s Regulations.

WHEREFORE, JAFS respectfully requests that the Department promptly grant a 

final order and certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing it to provide 

foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail.

SPH-2136284-1
10
10
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet of Adams Outdoor Advertising, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and the related
Statements of Operations and Cash Flows and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001011976
<NAME> ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                        40
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      40
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                         (60)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        40
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>