alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008272EN.01004302.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/43

---

Action brought on 22 August 2008 — Papierfabrik Hamburger-Spremberg v Commission

(Case T-350/08)

(2008/C 272/86)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Papierfabrik Hamburger-Spremberg GmbH & Co. KG (Spremberg, Germany) (represented by: S. Polster, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested Commission Decision C(2008) 1107 final of 2 April 2008 in State aid case N 582/2007 — Germany, according to which the regional aid in favour of Propapier PM 2 GmbH & Co. KG is compatible with the EC Treaty; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested Commission Decision C(2008) 1107 final of 2 April 2008 in State aid case N 582/2007 — Germany, according to which the regional aid in favour of Propapier PM 2 GmbH & Co. KG is compatible with the EC Treaty;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the applicant's costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the applicant's costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant contests Commission Decision C(2008) 1107 final of 2 April 2008, by which the Commission declared that the regional aid which the Federal Republic of Germany approved for Propapier PM 2 is compatible with the EC Treaty.

The applicant relies on the following three pleas in law in support of its action.

First, the applicant alleges that, by not opening the formal investigation procedure, the Commission infringed Article 88(2) EC, Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 (1) and paragraph 68 et seq. of the Guidelines on national regional aid for 2007-2013 (2).

1

et seq

2

By its second plea in law the applicant complains that the obligation to provide reasons was infringed in relation to the nature of the regional aid Guidelines as the exclusive basis for the decision; it also complains of infringements in relation to the need to take into account the market for recycled fibre as the upstream market for corrugated case material and regarding the assessment of the competitive position on those markets and on the downstream corrugated board market of the recipient of State aid Propapier PM 2.

Finally the applicant claims with reference to the distortion of competition associated with the investment project affecting a total of three product markets that the regional aid approved for Propapier PM 2 is incompatible with the common market.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (OJ 1999 L 83, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ 2006 C 54, p. 13.

2

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intelligent Living Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mark B. Lucky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.       The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

May 20, 2014

 

By: /s/ Mark B. Lucky

Mark B. Lucky,

Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23.3 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

 

We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 33-85896) and Form S-8 (File No. 33-78592, File No. 333-69913, File No. 333-79445, File No. 333-37912, File No. 333-62078, File No. 333-76488, and File No.333-79503) of D&E Communications, Inc. of our report dated March 1, 2005, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Pilicka Telefonia Sp. z o.o. which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

 

/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers Sp. z o.o. 

 

 

Warsaw, Poland 

March 1, 2005
nonorable Thoms A; Khcat

County fdtoroep Llbcrty Cwnty LLborty-, ‘T0:ccls Dear i%rrr.

Your two lsttora oplntono.uponr-. With rofcrcnoo to your first quontion quoted

ahow, YSbartp County o~omtoo wxlcr tbc ~encltel read laa of this. st.nte, end WI hew beon un~blo to S:;13 any&?tatutory authority sM.ob would alloii tho cox~Js3ionora bf Liberty County oxpusos whil.c tr~vo1i.n~ .out of the county on officialbWinox~. Thio dc3ar’;mPsnth&s rqcitMadly hold **UgOA ii**  **AU&al*** **Of CU~StbAU**  **ShilW f.0**  the **QUQotiGXI** premntcd by you th6t in the cfbnorico OS f vclid statute, the Cozdsioners~ Court hna no authority to allow hny ou!! or noncy to itu mozbors .for O’AFQ~OC~

In this cioltncction, WO em enrio~ing’horcw~th for your laforz5M.on co&w of o~Lniow3 fioe. C-752 end Q-1926*

.

.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
reports (and all references to our Firm) included in or made part of this
registration statement.
 
                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Orange County, California
November 13, 1996
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Consortium for Economic Research on AD_ADRD Research.                    

*Date:*                         April 2, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Joshua Jin-Hyouk Park, Ph.D.,  Scientific Review Officer,  Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg. Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-6208,                         *joshua.park4@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 12, 2024.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-00956 Filed 1-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
~D ST41~

9i ~ 0 ?:q( PRO~~ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 October 15, 2014
Red Mesa Chapter, Navajo Nation Reservation P.O. Box 422 Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 ATTN: Minne John Subject: Requestto retain public documents at the Red Mesa Chapter for public inspection Dear Ms. John: The purpose ofthis letter is to requestthatthe Red Mesa Chapterofthe Navajo Nation Reservation retain the enclosed documents atthe Red Mesa Chapter House for at least sixty (60) days forpublic inspection. These documents are the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency’s preliminary decision forthe proposed Clean AirAct Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration amendment permit forthe McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation nearthe city of Aneth, San Juan County, Utah. These documents are currently available for public comment. Please contact me at (415) 947-4156 or kelly.shtheerah(~epa.gov ifyou have any questions.

Shaheerah Kelly, Environmental Engineer Permits Office Air Division
Enclosures
09/20/2010 09:52 4252271007 ANM7 PAGE 02/03 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

B 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

15 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

38 

39 

40 

41 

42 

43 

44 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

Scott R. Morria 

FAA Office of Regional Counsel 

1601 Lind Ave., SW 

Renton, Washington 98057 

Telephone: 425/227-1417 

Facsimile: 425/227-1007 

DEPARTMENT OF 

' WNSPORWION 

" ;KEr OPERATIONS 

2m SE? 2Lj p |: 58 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

In the Matter of 

Peter Simons 

FAA DOCKET NUMBER CP10NM0004 

DMS No. FAA-2giO=Q534 

MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE 

,TUDGE GOODWIN 

TO: Administrative Law Judge: 

Complainant, through his undersigned counsel, pursuant to Rules of Practice 13,218(a) and FRE 

201, hereby moves that the AU take judicial notice of the following: 

1. The Administrator's published sanction guidelines for hazardous material violations in FAA 

Order 2150.3B, Appendix C, especially Figure C-1 (the sanction matrix), 

2. 49 C.F.R. § 172.101 (Table); specifically concerning Petroleum gases, liquefied (also known as 

Liquefied Petroleum Gas), Class 2.1, UNI075, including Column 9a 

DATED this 20th day of September 2010. 

COTT R, MORRIS 

FAA Attorney 
09/20/2010 09:52 4252271007 ANM7 PAGE 03/03 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Motion to Take .Tudicial Notice has been served via 

Facsimile and Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested this date, to the following: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Rm El 2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

T: 202.366.2139 

F: 202.366.7536 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

F: 202.493.5020 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Motion to Take Judicial Notice has been served via 

Regular and Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested this date, to the following: 

Peter Simons 

2216 N. Farragut Avenue 

Colorado, Spring, CO 80907 

Dated this 20th day of September, 2010, 

Dana Stephenson 

Office of Regional Counsel (ANM-7) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Ave. SW 

Renton,WA 98057 

(425)227-2164
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 27, 2015

NO. 03-14-00563-CR

Tarsha Yvonne Wiley, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of adjudication signed by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of adjudication but that there was clerical error requiring correction. 

Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment of adjudication to reflect that appellant’s 

“Plea to the Motion to Adjudicate” was “Not True” and to reflect that the trial court found that 

appellant violated the terms and conditions of supervision as alleged in paragraphs A through J 

of the State’s motion to adjudicate. The Court affirms the judgment of adjudication as modified. 

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.4
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Principal Financial Officer)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 of AirNet Systems, Inc.; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
 Dated:  April 29, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Ray L. DruseikisRay L. DruseikisVice President of Finance and Controller; Interim Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) 28
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 The
        undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly
        Report on Form 10 QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies
        with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of
        1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of
        the Company.
 
 This
        15th
        day of May, 2007.


/s/
              Stephen D. Barnhill, M.D.Stephen
              D. Barnhill, M.D.Chief
                Executive Officer and Chairman
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1084

CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, DOUGLAS C. RINER, Defendant - Appellant, versus ESTATE OF KAREN DENISE LANE RINER; ROBERT VARNER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-65-1-JPJ) Submitted: June 30, 2005 Decided: July 29, 2005 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas C. Riner, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Worth McAfee, MCAFEE LAW FIRM, P.C., Norton, Virginia, for Appellees. Deborah Wood Dobbins, Robin J. Kegley, GILMER, SADLER, INGRAM, SUTHERLAND & HUTTON, Pulaski, Virginia, for Plaintiff. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Douglas C. Riner appeals the district court’s order awarding summary judgment to defendant and denying his motion to stay the proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. SeeConnecticut General Life Ins. Co. v. Riner , No. CA-00-65-1-JPJ (W.D. Va. Jan 4. 2005). We deny Riner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court as moot because he paid the filing fee. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, MarkA. Herpich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

                (1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

              (2) The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 
|  /s/ Mark A. Herpich |
|---------------------------|
| Mark  A. Herpich          |
| Chief  Financial Officer  |
| November  9, 2007         |
|                      |

 

 

 

31

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 3.1

                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                            VINEYARD NATIONAL BANCORP


                                        I

                  The name of this Corporation is VINEYARD NATIONAL BANCORP.

                                       II

                  The purpose of this Corporation is to engage in any lawful act
or activity for which a corporation may be organized under the General
Corporation Law of California, other than the banking business, the trust
company business, or the practice of a profession permitted to be incorporated
by the California Corporations Code.

                                       III

                  The name and address in the State of California of this
Corporation's initial agent for service of process is: David A. Buxbaum, 414
Yale Avenue, Claremont, CA 91711.

                                       IV

                  This Corporation is authorized to issue only one class of
shares of stock and the total number of shares which this Corporation is
authorized to issue is Fifteen Million (15,000,000).

                                        V

                  The liability of the directors of the corporation for monetary
damages shall be eliminated to the fullest extent permissible under California
law.

Dated: May 13, 1988


                                                     /s/ DAVID A. BUXBAUM
                                                     ___________________________
                                                     DAVID A. BUXBAUM
                                                     Incorporator

                  I hereby declare that I am the person who executed the
foregoing Articles of Incorporation, which execution is my act and deed.


                                                     /s/ DAVID A. BUXBAUM
                                                     ___________________________
                                                     DAVID A. BUXBAUM
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1709

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to adjust the maximum

hour exemption for agricultural employees, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 25, 1996

Mr. CRAIG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to adjust

the maximum hour exemption for agricultural employees,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS

4 ACT OF 1938.

5 Section 13(b)(12) of the Fair Labor Standards Act

6 of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(b)(12)) is amended by inserting

7 after ‘‘water’’ the following: ‘‘, at least 75 percent of which

8 is ultimately delivered’’.

Æ
#### Russell AIKEN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CITY OF MEMPHIS, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 92-6154, 92-6159.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 3, 1994.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this ease en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

> The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dresser, Inc. (Dresser) for the period ended
June 30, 2005 (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Dresser as of the dates and for the periods presented in such Report.



Dated: December 20, 2005



/s/    PATRICK M.
MURRAYPatrick M. Murray Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board