alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Edghill Leo FRANCIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph BROOKS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-6704.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 16, 2003.

Decided Feb. 3, 2003.

Edghill Leo Francis, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*192PER CURIAM.

Edghill Leo Francis seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition as a motion arising under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and dismissing it without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and agree with the district court that the claims Francis seeks to raise cannot be pursued under § 2241. Because Francis has previously filed a motion seeking relief under § 2255, *see United States v. Francis,*No. 99-6042, 1999 WL 147849 (4th Cir. Mar.18, 1999) (unpublished), however, he must seek authorization from this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) prior to filing a successive motion under § 2255. Because Francis has not received this authorization, the district court properly dismissed his motion without prejudice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Principal Financial Officer)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 of AirNet Systems, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    [Reserved];c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 Dated:  March 31, 2006
    By:
    /s/ Gary W. QualmannGary W. Qualmann,Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 10.45























April 12, 2011





Via Email:                Jeffrey Miles, attorney for Global Renaissance Entertainment Group (jsm1001@aol.com)


Arthur Wylie (arthurwylie@gmail.com); Dale Godboldo (dalegodboldo@gmail.com)





Dear Jeffrey, Arthur & Dale,





Following my discussion last Sunday evening with Dale Godboldo, it appears unlikely that Global Renaissance Entertainment Group, Inc. ("GREG") will be able to deliver the Closing documents to Global Entertainment Holdings, Inc. ("GBHL") required under the terms of our Share Exchange Agreement, dated July 1, 2010 (the "Share Agreement") by this Thursday, April 14, 2011, in time for filing our annual report with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).





As of this date, GBHL has not received the certificate representing GBHL's equity interest in GREG, nor any of the additional Closing documents listed under Section 6.1(a) of the Share Agreement. As discussed, these Closing documents have been outstanding for over six months and GBHL's audit team needs copies of these Closing documents, as well as properly prepared financial statements (in compliance with GAAP), in order for our auditor to book the underlying transaction of the Share Agreement for our audited financial statements that must be filed on April 15, 2011.  If our auditor doesn’t receive these items, it could hold up our audit, which could result in us losing our status as a Bulletin Board trading company. However, if you can comply with our auditor’s request and deliver all of the foregoing items, the balance of this letter will become moot.





Accordingly, GBHL and GREG hereby mutually agree to render the Share Agreement void, ab initio, and of no force or effect whatsoever, thereby returning the parties to their respective positions immediately prior to executing the Share Agreement. Please return the GBHL share certificate issued to GREG last July, 2010, as it must be canceled and disclosed as such in our upcoming SEC filings.  Furthermore, although it pains us, we must ask that you refrain from discussing the former association represented in the Share Agreement and the related Joint Venture Agreement.





Please acknowledge your receipt of this letter and indicated your agreement with the foregoing terms by signing and returning a copy of this letter to the undersigned by this Thursday, April 14, 2011. We look forward to discussing to continuation of our relationship in the near future at a time when GREG has completed its financial statements.





Regards,


Global Entertainment Holdings, Inc.








By:  /s/ Gary Rasmussen


Gary Rasmussen, CEO





cc: Stanley Weiner, CFO





Agreed to this 14th day of April, 2011, and effective as of July 1, 2010:





Global Renaissance Entertainment Group, Inc.








By:  /s/ Arthur Wylie


Arthur Wylie, CEO
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bernard, Allan & Edwards, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the "Report"),
I, Michael McLaughlin, CEO/CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18  U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.

/s/    Michael McLaughlin
Michael McLaughlin
CEO/CFO
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)

January 9, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version
of this written statement has been  provided to the Company and will be
retained  by the  Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001011991
<NAME> SUSA PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,699
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  176,866
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               178,565
<PP&E>                                       1,670,892
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,754,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,766
<BONDS>                                        818,116
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     847,037
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,754,919
<SALES>                                        243,767
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               252,718
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  132,154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,051<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 72,291
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             72,291
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    72,291
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.28
<FN>
<F1>Included in other expenses are minority interest expense and gain (loss) on
exchange of self-storage facilities
</FN>


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

9:30 a.m. EST, Monday, January 22, 2024.

# PLACE:

CFTC Headquarters Conference Center, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW, Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) will hold this meeting to consider the following matters:
      - Notice of Proposed Order and Request for Comment on an Application for a Capital Comparability Determination Submitted on behalf of Nonbank Swap Dealers subject to Capital and Financial Reporting Requirements of the United Kingdom and Regulated by the United Kingdom Prudential Regulation Authority;
      - LCH SA Request for Exemption from Regulation 1.49(d)(3) to Hold Customer Funds at the Banque de France; and
      -  Proposed Rule:                          Requirements for Designated Contract Markets and Swap Execution Facilities Regarding Governance and the Mitigation of Conflicts of Interest Impacting Market Regulation Functions.                    

                        The agenda for this meeting will be available to the public and posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.cftc.gov.*                         Members of the public are free to attend the meeting in person, or have the option to listen by phone or view a live stream. Instructions for listening to the meeting by phone and connecting to the live video stream will be posted on the Commission's website.                    

In the event that the time, date, or place of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, or place of the meeting, will be posted on the Commission's website.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Christopher Kirkpatrick, Secretary of the Commission, 202-418-5964.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

Dated: January 12, 2024.

Christopher Kirkpatrick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2024-00943 Filed 1-12-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1959/2006

of 21 December 2006         

fixing the refunds applicable to cereal and rice sector products supplied as Community and national food aid

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1) and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (2) and in particular Article 14(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For Community and national food aid operations under international agreements or other supplementary programmes, and other Community free supply measures, the refunds applicable to cereals and rice sector products shall be as set out in the Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 December 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 797/2006 (OJ L 144, 31.5.2006, p. 1).

(3)OJ L 288, 25.10.1974, p. 1.

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 21 December 2006 fixing the refunds applicable to cereal and rice sector products supplied as Comunity and national food aid

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-50342

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE SALAZAR-GUZMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-00-CR-715-ALL

--------------------

October 29, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Salazar-Guzman appeals the 41-month term of

imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction of

being found in the United States after removal in violation of

8 U.S.C. § 1326. Salazar-Guzman contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)

and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues

that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his

increased sentence was an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment. 

Salazar-Guzman notes that he pleaded guilty to an indictment
No. 01-50342 

-2-

which recited only facts and elements supporting a charge of

simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and argues that his

sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which

may be imposed for that offense. Salazar-Guzman acknowledges

that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision

in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but

seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of

the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). SalazarGuzman’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

 AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RESTORATIONS UNLIMTED, LLC, a/a/o KATHLEEN REED,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA FAMILY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-133

[April 29, 2021]

Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Paige Gillman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2019-AP-000064 

and 50-2015-CC-012510.

Scott G. Millard and Kevin Vorhis of the Cohen Law Group, P.A., 

Maitland, for appellant.

Mihaela Cabulea and Anthony J. Russo of Butler Weihmuller Katz 

Craig, LLP; and Nicholas J. Reising, Jr. of Loughren, Doyle and Reising, 

P.A., Fort Lauderdale for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1567/2006

of 19 October 2006         

fixing the export refunds on syrups and certain other sugar products exported without further processing

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the market in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Export refunds as provided for in Article 32 of Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 shall be granted on the products and for the amounts set out in the Annex to this Regulation subject to the conditions provided for in paragraph 2 of this Article.

2.   To be eligible for a refund under paragraph 1 products must meet the relevant requirements laid down in Articles 3 and 4 of Regulation (EC) No 951/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 October 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 October 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 178, 1.7.2006, p. 24.

----

ANNEX

Export refunds on syrups and certain other sugar products exported without further processing applicable from 20 October 2006 (1)

----

(1)  The amounts set out in this Annex are not applicable with effect from 1 February 2005 pursuant to Council Decision 2005/45/EC of 22 December 2004 concerning the conclusion and application of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 as regards the provisions applicable to processed agricultural products (OJ L 23, 26.1.2005, p. 17).

(1)  The basic amount is not applicable to the product defined under point 2 of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3513/92 (OJ L 355, 5.12.1992, p. 12).

----
July 31, 2014 Testimony on#EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0602

JohnJoseph Dziak, Ph.D. 110 East Foster Avenue, Apt. 314 State College, PA 16801 dziakj1@grnail.com

Hello, I'mDr. John Dziak. I am a statistician helping with social scienceresearch at Penn State. I am here to express my personal support for the EPA's proposed carbonemission limitations. Last yearI had the amazing opportunityto visit my dear, beautiful sponsored childrenFridah and Emily and their families, intheirvillage Marimanti in the Tharaka District of Kenya. Tharaka is a hot, dry land, almost desert, with a few people and their goats and chickens, and thorny plants. But the people were mostlykind and good. One dirt-poor farmer offered a beautiful goat as a present for his visitors, and I had to apologize for being unable to take it. In recent years Tharaka has been experiencing unusually severe droughts inwhich people were going hungry because could not grow enough food. Scientists predict that climatechange will make Africa even hotter and morevulnerable to deadly droughts. Ifelt badthat ifwe do not change, we will hurt their land andpeople. I spoke about this with a holy priest who helps look afterthe children. He saidhe was also worried about climate change but that I should not feel too bad because Iwould do something ifI could. This is my small attempt not to let them down. I am also worried about the beautiful wildlife such as rhinoceros and giraffe which I saw onthat trip. In past times, wildlife could sometimes adapt to weather changes by moving to more fertile areas. But now there are human cities, farms and roads intheirway, and both humans and animals will increasingly suffer from conflict. As Americans, wereally want to make the world better, not worse. Making the way weproduce our energy cleanerwill be a big help towards this. Thankyou very much!
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of NEXHORIZON COMMUNICATIONS,  INC. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,  2008,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Daniel
M. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 18, 2008



By:       /s/ Daniel M. Smith
         -----------------------------
         Daniel M. Smith
         Chief Financial Officer