alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LitFunding Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Morton Reed, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Morton Reed                                              |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Morton Reed                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | November 21, 2005                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1615

THEODORE M. JUDY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY BOARD OF GOVERNORS, a

Public Entity,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

FIDELITY NATIONAL COLLECTIONS, Division of

Fidelity Properties, Incorporated; WEST

VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INCORPORATED, a

West Virginia Corporation and a Functional

Operation Unit of West Virginia University

Board of Governors, a Public Entity,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-02-156-1)

Submitted: November 30, 2004 Decided: December 29, 2004

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
- 2 -

John R. Goodwin, Las Vegas, Nevada, for Appellant. William S.

Adams, MACCORKLE, LAVENDER, CASEY & SWEENEY, P.L.L.C., Morgantown,

West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Theodore M. Judy appeals the district court’s orders

granting summary judgment to the West Virginia University Board of

Governors and denying his motion for reconsideration in his civil

action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Judy v. Fid. Nat’l Collections, No. CA-02-156-1 (N.D.W.

Va. Nov. 7, 2003 & Apr. 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.4
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Walter Z. Berger, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the periodended August 31, 2003 of Emmis Operating Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2004   /s/ WALTER Z. BERGER Walter Z. Berger Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
7
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                         OF TITLE 18 UNITED STATES CODE

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of CITGO Petroleum Corporation (the "Registrant"), does
hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

         The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2003 of the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

Dated: March 27, 2004                            /s/    Luis E. Marin
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Name:  Luis E. Marin
                                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer
IB 

Union Calendar No. 505 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5076 

[Report No. 115–657] 

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to extend the examination 

cycle for certain insured depository institutions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 20, 2018 

Ms. TENNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

APRIL 26, 2018 

Additional sponsors: Mr. CRIST and Mr. SHERMAN

APRIL 26, 2018 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Insert the part printed in italic] 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5076 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to extend the 

examination cycle for certain insured depository institutions. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5076 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Bank Exam 

5 Cycle Improvement Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXAMINATION CYCLE. 

7 Section 10(d) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act 

8 (12 U.S.C. 1820(d)) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (4)(A), by striking 

10 ‘‘$1,000,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$3,000,000,000’’; 

11 and 

12 (2) in paragraph (10), by striking 

13 ‘‘$1,000,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$3,000,000,000’’. 

14 SEC. 3. GAO STUDY AND REPORT. 

15 Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of 

16 this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall 

17 submit a report to the Congress on the effect of extending 

18 the examination cycle for qualifying institutions pursuant 

19 to section 2 of this Act on the ability of agencies to effec20 tively supervise and protect the safety and soundness of 

21 qualifying institutions. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 505 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5076 

[Report No. 115–657] 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to expository institutions. tend the examination cycle for certain insured deAPRIL 26, 2018 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: May 13, 2011
/s/ NANCIE J. SMITHNancie J. SmithPresident and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. The foregoing certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
#### Stefen Emira HARRIS, Ras, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA; Charles M. Condon, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 02-7633.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 16, 2003.

Decided Jan. 24, 2003.

Stefen Emira Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Creighton Waters, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Stefen Emira Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on September 12, 2002. The notice of appeal was filed on October 17, 2002. Because Harris failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Edward ELLERBE, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Edward Ellerbe, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 02-7604, 02-7889.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 2003.

Decided Feb. 12, 2003.

James Edward Ellerbe, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Ellerbe appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a court order, denying his supplemental motion for a court order, denying his second supplemental motion for a court order, and denying his motion for a downward *693departure. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the orders of the district court. *See United States v. Ellerbe,*No. CR-97-100 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2002; filed Nov. 5, 2002 *&*entered Nov. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P. AS OF AND FOR THE 12 
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          45,378
<SECURITIES>                                   175,026
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               220,404
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 220,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,694
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     212,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   220,404
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,234
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,011
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,011
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,011
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   181.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   181.48
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard HENSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-5605.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 31, 2003.

Before MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT and LAY,* Circuit Judges.

*

The Honorable Donald P. Lay, United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

*ORDER*

Richard Henson appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence. The parties have expressly waived oral argument pursuant to Rule 34(j)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit, and we agree that oral argument is not necessary. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Henson pleaded guilty to charges of possession with the intent to distribute and distribution of marijuana and methamphetamine, violations of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He was sentenced to 45 months of imprisonment to be followed by three years of supervised release.

On appeal, Henson challenges his sentence, contending that the district court should have granted him a downward departure in offense level — pursuant to USSG § 5K2.13 — because his mental capacity was diminished. Both parties have waived oral argument in their briefs.

Henson’s contention that the district court should have granted him a downward departure is not cognizable in the circumstances presented in this case. A district court’s discretionary decision not to depart downward from the guidelines range ordinarily is not appealable. *United States v. Byrd,*53 F.3d 144, 145 (6th Cir.1995). An appeal may be taken, however, when the district court believed that it lacked the authority to depart downward as a matter of law. *United States v. Landers,*39 F.3d 643, 649 (6th Cir.1994). To determine whether the court believed that it lacked authority to deviate from the guidelines, we examine the transcript of the sentencing hearing. *United States v. Ebolum,*72 F.3d 35, 37 (6th Cir.1995). Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals that the district court did not mistakenly believe that it lacked the authority *353to grant the requested departure: it merely found that a departure was not appropriate in the light of the particular circumstances of the case. This issue is unappealable. *United States v. Buchanan,*207 F.3d 344, 355, 2000 WL 183881 (6th Cir.2000).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
# C_2008092EN.01003001.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/30

---

Action brought on 21 January 2008 — Laboratórios Wellcome de Portugal v OHIM — Serono Genetics Institute (FAMOXIN)

(Case T-26/08)

(2008/C 92/62)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Laboratórios Wellcome de Portugal Lda (Algés, Portugal) (represented by: R. Gilbey, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Serono Genetics Institute SA (Evry, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal OHIM dated 20 November 2007 (Case R 10/2007-1) and declare the request for invalidation brought by the appellant well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal OHIM dated 20 November 2007 (Case R 10/2007-1) and declare the request for invalidation brought by the appellant well founded;

| — | annul all cost orders made against the appellant by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market and order the latter to bear the costs of the appellant. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul all cost orders made against the appellant by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market and order the latter to bear the costs of the appellant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The word mark ‘FAMOXIN’ for goods and services in class 5 — Community trade mark No 2 491 298

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Serono Genetics Institute SA

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: The national word mark ‘LANOXIN’ for goods in class 5

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the request for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 52 and 56(2) and (3) of Council Regulation No 40/94, as the Board of Appeal found the earlier trade mark to be used for ‘pharmaceutical preparations with digoxin for cardiovascular illnesses’ and not ‘pharmaceutical preparations with digoxin’ and as it assessed the relevant public, the level of attentiveness of the different parts of the relevant public and the similarity of the conflicting trade marks and goods incorrectly.

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June30, 2010



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Erwin Haitzmann       
|Erwin Haitzmann           
|Co Chief Executive Officer