alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Peter Wanner, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of First NationalPower Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2006;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. The registrant's other certifying offering officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the"Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committeeof registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisquarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 23, 2006

 

***/s/ Peter Wanner           ***

Peter Wanner

Chief Financial Officer
May 7, 2014 SecretaryAnthony Foxx U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 

### RE: Docket DOT-OST-2008-0299 Dear Secretary Foxx, : ---,**~** .·.. § •.,..J

Iwrite to express my concerns with the Department ofTransportation's Tentative Orderto terminate the Essential Air Service (EAS) program in El Centro, California located in Imperial County. I urge you to considerthe negative economic impacts that may occur as a result of the proposed termination ofthe program. The Imperial County Airport has a tremendous track record ofsurpassing the EAS program requirements put forth by the government, as they have dramatically exceeded the enplanement minimum in four ofthe last five fiscal years. Unfortunately, in FY 2013, the Imperial County Airport barely fell belowthe ten enplanementthreshold, by reaching 9.5 enplanements for the first time. As you know, the Essential Air Service was put into place to guarantee that small communities, including those within the Imperial County, continue to be served by certificated air carriers. Overthe last several years, Imperial County has experienced the highest unemployment rate in the nation. Ourfederal government should encourage economic growth, and consider all factors before terminating a much-needed program in the region. As you prepare the Final Order, I urge you to consider the Imperial Valley's track record over the last three fiscal years, and ask that you consider the void that will be left should the Department ofTransportation ultimately decide to terminate the much-needed Essential Air Service program currently in effect atthe Imperial CountyAirport. Thank you for your time and consideration of my request.**~cere**

### I):'. ·"'-.,**~.", ···~** ... David M. Tyler 

## \

1225 W. Main Street El Centro CA 92243 

### I www.tylerins.com 

### I (760) 352-2611 

### I Fax (760) 337-8428 license No. 0226696
#### Kevin FOX, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC., f/k/a Garrett Alresearch Manufacturing Co. of California, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-5587.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Nov. 17, 1993.

Linda Singer Stein, J. Thompson Thornton, Thornton, David, Murray, Richard & Davis, P.A., Miami, FL, for defendant-appellant.

G. William Bissett, Hardy & Bissett, P.A., Miami, FL, Donald T. Norton, co-counsel, Cohen & Cohen, Hollywood, FL, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FAY and BIRCH, Circuit Judges, and DYER, Senior Circuit Judge.

FAY, Circuit Judge:

Following oral argument in this case, we certified the following question of law to the Florida Supreme Court:

> Whether the interpretation of Fla.Stat. § 768.81(3) requires consideration by the jury of a non-party’s comparative fault in order to determine a party’s liability?

*Fox v. Allied-Signal, Inc.,*966 F.2d 626, 628 (11th Cir.1992). That opinion contains a summary of the facts, which need not be repeated here.

The Florida Supreme Court has now answered the certified question in the affirmative. *Allied Signal, Inc. v. Fox,*623 So.2d 1180, 1182 (Fla.1993). We VACATE the district court judgment in this case and REMAND for a retrial in accordance with the Florida law as announced.

VACATED and REMANDED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF MAX CAPITAL GROUP LTD.**

This certification isprovided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 of Max Capital Group Ltd. (the“Issuer”). 

I, W. Marston Becker, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer, certify that: 

(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Issuer. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

Dated: August 6, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME OF MONACO COACH CORPORATION
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 3, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS EITIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                       127
<INVENTORY>                                     45,421
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,432
<PP&E>                                          60,974
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,020
<BONDS>                                         11,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   159,832
<SALES>                                        441,895
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               441,895
<CGS>                                          382,367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  419,268
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,379
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,255
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,819
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,436
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,436
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.39
        

</TABLE>
# The Effects of Gasoline Sulfur Level on Emissions from Tier 2 Vehicles in the In

- Use Fleet
Appendix D Discussion of Univariate and Multivariate Analysis of Variance

Assessment and Standards Division Office of Transportation and Air Quality U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

NOTICE
This technical report does not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or positions. It is intended to present technical analysis of issues using data that are currently available. The purpose in the release of such reports is to facilitate the exchange of technical information and to inform the public of technical developments.

EPA-420-D-13-003 April 2013

### Appendix D. Discussion of univariate and multivariate analysis of **variance**

The univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) uses the ordinary least squares to test the fixed effects. It requires equal time spacing of measurements, and assumes compound symmetry of covariance structure of equal variance and covariance across mileage. The assumptions made
for ANOVA are not true for emission measurements in the current dataset and thus, it may use incorrect standard errors for the comparison of means at different mileage s resulting in Type I error of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true

. i
, ii

The multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) also uses ordinary least squares to test
the fixed effects. I t assumes an unstructured covariance structure, and may result in less powerful test by wasting information inh erent in repeated measures data. iii Furthermore, i t requires regularly spaced time intervals for all vehicles which were not the case in the “sulfur level” data where emissions were measured at different accumulated mileage s. The actual mileage accumulated varied from vehicle t o vehicle for several reasons. The most obvious is the modification to the L procedure during t he test program, where evenly spaced mileage intervals occurring in emission test s were replaced with an alternating mix of on -road and test cell driving

. Besi des this, major adjustment differences also exist due to voided tests, long weekends or holidays necessitating additional re

- preps prior to testing, and occasional errors in reco rding of odometer readings.

Littell, R.C., Henry, R.C., & Ammerman, C.B. (1998). Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J. Anim. Sci. 76:1216

– 1231. ii Templeman, R.J., Douglass, L.W. & Craig, B.A. (2002). NCR

- 170 FASS Mixed Model Workshop 2002 ADSA

ASASCSAS National meetings, Quebec City, QC. 24

– 25. iii SAS Institute, Inc . ( 2002). SAS course notes on Mixed Model Analysis Using SAS System. SAS Institute, Inc.,

Cary, NC.

68 i
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 12/31/96
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           4,278
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,893
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,081
<INVENTORY>                                      2,473
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,342
<PP&E>                                          17,242
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 184,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,786
<BONDS>                                        120,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (79,935)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   184,128
<SALES>                                        138,979
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               139,979
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,574
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   804
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,514
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,225
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,144
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,081
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (6,552)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,471)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                 EXHIBIT (23)(a)



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-34359 and 333-34361) of Professionals Group,
Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2000 relating to the financial statements,
which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated March 14, 2000 relating to the financial statement
schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 24, 2000
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of microHelix, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Terrence A. Rixford, Senior Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer and
Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.




/s/ Terrence A. Rixford
------------------------------------
Terrence A. Rixford
Senior Vice President-Finance,
Chief Financial Officer and Director
November 13, 2002
<PAGE>   1

                                                                EXHIBIT 23.2
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No.
333-13161 of Doubletree Corporation on Form S-3 of our reports dated February
24, 1996, on Red Lion Hotels, Inc. as of and for the ten months ended December
31, 1995, and of Red Lion, a California Limited Partnership, for the seven
months ended July 31, 1995, appearing in the Prospectus, which is a part of such
Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading "Experts"
in such Prospectus.

                                            DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Portland, Oregon
October 14, 1996
Exhibit 10.37








Exhibit
10.37


	 	
      CIT
      Business Credit
	
      T:
      212 536-1200
	 
	 	
      211
      Avenue of the Americas
	 
	 	
      New
      York, NY 10036
	 	 









December
30, 2004







KNOGO
NORTH AMERICA INC.

1881
Lakeland Avenue

Ronkonkoma,
New York 11779




Gentlemen:




Reference
is made to (i) the Financing Agreement between us dated March 22, 2002, as the
same may be amended from time to time (the “Financing Agreement”) and (ii) the
Forbearance Agreement between us dated December 8, 2003, as the same may be
amended from time to time (the “Forbearance Agreement”). Capitalized terms used
herein and defined in the Financing Agreement and/or the Forbearance Agreement
(as defined in the Financing Agreement) shall have the same meanings herein as
specified therein unless otherwise specifically defined herein.




Effectively
immediately, pursuant to mutual understanding and agreement, the Financing
Agreement shall be, and hereby is, amended as follows:




1.  The
expiration date of the Forbearance Agreement shall be extended from December 8,
2004 to June 30, 2005. In addition, the date December 8, 2004 set forth in
Paragraph B of the Forbearance Agreement (which was extended from the original
date of June 25, 2004) with respect to the $20,000 monthly payments on the
Inventory Loan shall be extended to June 30, 2005.




2.  The
definition of Anniversary Date as referred to Section 1 of the Financing
Agreement shall be, and hereby is, deleted in its entirety and replaced by the
following:




 
“Anniversary
Date shall
mean June 30, 2005.”




Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary contained in the Financing Agreement, the Financing
Agreement shall automatically terminate as of the Anniversary Date and all
Obligations under the Financing Agreement shall become immediately due and
payable on the Anniversary Date.




To
compensate us for the use of our in-house legal department and facilities in
documenting this agreement, you agree to pay us a Documentation Fee equal to
$270.00. Said amount shall be due and payable upon the date hereof and may at
our option be charged to your account under the Financing Agreement on the due
date thereof.




No other
change in the terms or provisions of the Financing Agreement or Forbearance
Agreement is intended or implied, and each of such agreements is hereby ratified
and confirmed.

 





















If the
foregoing, is in accordance with your understanding our agreement kindly so
indicate by signing and returning the enclosed copy of this letter. The
Guarantor has signed below to confirm that its guaranty and/or pledge and
security agreements shall continue in full force and effect notwithstanding the
foregoing agreement.





	 	
      Very
      truly yours,

	 	 
	 	
      THE
      CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.

	 	 
	 	
      By:
      /s/
      Kim Nguyen

	 	
      Title:
      Assistant Vice President







Read and
Agreed to:




KNOGO
NORTH AMERICA INC.




By:
/s/
Peter J. Mundy

Title:
Vice President - CFO







Confirmed:




SENTRY
TECHNOLOGY CORP.




By:
/s/
Peter J. Mundy

Title:
Vice President - CFO
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                   MECHANICAL DYNAMICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
            LEGAL ENTITY                     INCORPORATION                    OWNERSHIP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                           <C>                 <C>
Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.                     Michigan, USA

MDI International, Inc.                       Michigan, USA       100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

Mechanical Dynamics Ltd.                      Canada              100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

Mechanical Dynamics FSC, Inc.                 Barbados            100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

Mechanical Dynamics GmbH                      Germany             100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

Mechanical Dynamics SarL                      France              100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

Mechanical Dynamics International, Ltd.       United Kingdom      100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

Mechanical Dynamics Sweden AB                 Sweden              100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

Mechanical Dynamics Italy srl                 Italy               100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

DTI Asia Pte. Ltd.                            Singapore           100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

Mechanical Dynamics Japan K.K.                Japan               66% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.
</TABLE>
##### 



FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 Contact:
    
    Jill Swartz
Triple Net Properties, LLC
1551 N. Tustin Avenue, Suite 300
Santa Ana, California 92705
714-667-8252 ext. 251jswartz@1031nnn.com
    

Accredited LOGO
 TRIPLE NET PROPERTIES ACQUIRES
EASTERN WISCONSIN MEDICAL PORTFOLIO IN WISCONSIN
 
 Santa Ana, Calif., December 28, 2007




---



##### 



FORWARD-LOOKING LANGUAGE
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Pictures Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Avery Pack, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: August 12, 2004

| /s/ Avery Pack                                                                                                                                        |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                       |
| Avery Pack, President        (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) |