alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5005 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5005

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 
study to determine the suitability and feasibility of establishing the 
birthplace of James Weldon Johnson in Jacksonville, Florida, as a unit 
                      of the National Park System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY OF JAMES WELDON JOHNSON BIRTHPLACE.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a special 
resource study to determine the suitability and feasibility of 
establishing the birthplace of James Weldon Johnson located at Adams & 
Lee Street in Jacksonville, Florida, as a unit of the National Park 
System.
    (b) Study Requirements.--The Secretary shall conduct the study in 
accordance with section 100507 of title 54, United States Code.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds 
are made available to carry out this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 
the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report 
that describes--
            (1) the results of the study; and
            (2) any recommendations of the Secretary.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5005

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 
study to determine the suitability and feasibility of establishing the 
birthplace of James Weldon Johnson in Jacksonville, Florida, as a unit 
                      of the National Park System.
```
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark A.
Herpich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Mark A.
    HerpichMark
      A. HerpichChief
      Financial OfficerNovember
      12, 2009
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 21, 2014.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 21, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0037. AMY KNIGHT ROBINSON v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

24415
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Larry E. Buffington                                  |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Larry Buffington,  President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 19, 2008                                     |

 

----
#### In the Matter of Habeas Corpus of Vera Sue WILLIAMS, a Minor. Cora WILLIAMS, Plaintiff in Error, v. Harold Lloyd WILLIAMS and Alice LaDean Williams, Defendants in Error.

No. 36236.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

March 29, 1955.

F. C. Swindell, Raymond Thomas, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Tom Durham, Tulsa, for defendants in error.

CORN, Justice.

Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered against her in the trial court, and on April 19, 1954, she filed her brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendants in error have filed no brief and have offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances as stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okl. 273, 274, 21 P.2d 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon *743which to sustain the action of the trial court, but this court may reverse and remand the cause with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded with directions to vacate the judgment entered for the plaintiffs below and to grant a new trial.

JOHNSON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and WELCH, HALLEY, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4989 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 18, 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

AN ACT 

To require the Department of State to establish a policy 

regarding the use of location-tracking consumer devices 

by employees at diplomatic and consular facilities, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4989 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Diplomats 

3 from Surveillance Through Consumer Devices Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SECURE UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC AND CON5 SULAR FACILITIES AGAINST CYBERSURVEIL6 LANCE. 

7 (a) POLICY ON LOCATION-TRACKING CONSUMER DE8 VICES.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the en9 actment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall establish 

10 a policy on the use of location-tracking consumer devices, 

11 including GPS-enabled devices, at United States diplo12 matic and consular facilities by United States Government 

13 employees, contractors, locally employed staff and mem14 bers of other agencies deployed to or stationed at such 

15 facilities. 

16 (b) SECURITY BRIEFING.—Existing and new employ17 ees at United States diplomatic and consular facilities, in18 cluding contractors, locally employed staff, and members 

19 of other agencies deployed to or stationed at such facili20 ties, shall, as a part of the security briefings provided to 

21 such employees, be informed of the policy described in sub22 section (a) and given instructions on the use of location23 tracking consumer devices both on and off the premises 

24 of such facilities. 

25 (c) COORDINATION.—The Secretary of State may co26 ordinate with the heads of any other agencies whose emVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:57 Jul 18, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4989.RFS H4989

daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4989 RFS

1 ployees are deployed to or stationed at United States dip2 lomatic and consular facilities in the formulation of the 

3 policy described in subsection (a) and the dissemination 

4 of such policy pursuant to subsection (b). 

5 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after the for6 mulation of the policy described in subsection (a), the Sec7 retary of State shall submit to the Committee on Foreign 

8 Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Com9 mittee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on the 

10 details of such policy. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5106 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require issuers to disclose 

in an annual report any substantial financial relationship with any manufacturer or dealer of firearms or ammunition. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2018 

Mr. MEEKS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require 

issuers to disclose in an annual report any substantial 

financial relationship with any manufacturer or dealer 

of firearms or ammunition. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Investor Choice 

5 Against Gun Proliferation Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5106 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL RELA2 TIONSHIP WITH ANY MANUFACTURER OR 

3 DEALER OF FIREARMS OR AMMUNITION. 

4 Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

5 (15 U.S.C. 78m) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(s) DISCLOSURE OF SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL RE8 LATIONSHIP WITH MANUFACTURER OR DEALER OF FIRE9 ARMS OR AMMUNITION.—Each issuer required to file an 

10 annual or quarterly report under subsection (a) shall an11 nually disclose in such a report any substantial financial 

12 relationship such issuer has with any manufacturer or 

13 dealer of firearms or ammunition.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6476]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   RECOGNITION OF THE MINORITY LEADER

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Republican leader is 
recognized.

                          ____________________
```
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1575/2006

of 19 October 2006         

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the import of maize issued in Regulation (EC) No 1421/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 13 October to 19 October 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the reduction in the duty on imported maize issued in Regulation (EC) No 1421/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 October 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 October 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 269, 28.9.2006, p. 6.

(3)OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1558/2005 (OJ L 249, 24.9.2005, p. 6).

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40791

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SERGIO GUZMAN-VALDEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:05-CR-353-ALL

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sergio Guzman-Valdez pleaded guilty and was convicted of importation of

cocaine. The district court sentenced him to 70 months of imprisonment, three

years of supervised release, and a $100 special assessment.

Guzman-Valdez argues that he was wrongly denied a downward

adjustment for his minor or minimal role in the offense. The advisory

Sentencing Guidelines provide for a reduction in the base offense level of a

“minor” or a “minimal” participant. U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. To merit a reduction

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 19, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-40791

2

under § 3B1.2, the defendant must have been “substantially less culpable” than

the average participant. § 3B1.2, comment. (n.3(A)). The role of a defendant in

the offense is a factual determination that we review for clear error. United

States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193, 203 (5th Cir. 2005). 

The presentence report(PSR) indicates that Guzman-Valdez’s car crossed

into Mexico nine times in just over two months. On one of these occasions

Guzman-Valdez was found to have $1450 hidden in the air vent of his car. The

PSR also indicates that Guzman-Valdez had a history of unemployment. 

Guzman-Valdez has not shown that his participation in the offense was

“peripheral to the advancement of the illicit activity” or that it was not “critical

to the offense,” given that he directly transported a sizable load of cocaine and

was found with a large sum of money concealed in his car’s air vent on a prior

occasion. Villanueva, 408 F.3d at 204; United States v. Tremelling, 43 F.3d 148,

153 (5th Cir. 1995). Guzman-Valdez has not demonstrated that the district

court’s denial of a role adjustment was clearly erroneous.

AFFIRMED.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5085 

To repeal the section of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation 

Act of 2012 that requires the Federal Communications Commission to 

reallocate and auction the T-Band spectrum. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2018 

Mr. ENGEL (for himself, Mr. ZELDIN, and Mr. KING of New York) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

A BILL 

To repeal the section of the Middle Class Tax Relief and 

Job Creation Act of 2012 that requires the Federal 

Communications Commission to reallocate and auction 

the T-Band spectrum. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Don’t Break Up the 

5 T-Band Act of 2018’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5085 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT TO REALLOCATE AND 

2 AUCTION T-BAND SPECTRUM. 

3 (a) REPEAL.—Section 6103 of the Middle Class Tax 

4 Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (47 U.S.C. 1413) 

5 is repealed. 

6 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

7 in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by striking the 

8 item relating to section 6103. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-94,792-04
EX P ARTE ROBERT NICHOLAS SIMMONS, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION F OR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 17F C -3271-H(1) IN THE 347TH DISTRICT COURT

F R OM NUECES COUNTY
Per curiam . S L A U G

H T E R , J., f

iled a concurring opinion. K E L L E R , P .J., dissented. O P I N I O N Applicant was convicted o f i n t ox ication manslaug hter and sentenced to fifteen y ears’ imprisonment. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Simmons v. State , 672 S.W
. 3d 821 (Tex
. App.—Corpus Christi 2023). Applicant filed this a pplication for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk f orwarded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant c o n t e n d s that a p pellate counsel failed to advise h im of his rig ht to file a pro se petition f or discretionary review. B a sed on the record, we have d etermined that appellate counsel’s performance was deficient and that Ap p l i c a n t would have timely filed a petition for discretionary review but for counsel’s deficient performance.2

Relief is g ranted. Ex parte W ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex
. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow , 180 S.W .3d 135 (Tex
. Crim. Ap p . 2005). Applicant may file an out-of-time petition f or discretionary review of the judg ment of the T h i rt e e nth Court of Appeals in cause number 13-22- 00322-CR. Should Applicant decide to file a petition for discretionary review, h e must file it with this Court within thirty

day s from the date of this Court’s mandate. C o p i e s o f t

h i s o p i n i o n shall b e sent to the Tex as Department o f Criminal J ustice–Correcti o n a l I nstitutions Division and the B oard of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: SEPTEMB E R 4, 2024 Do not publish
***Exhibit 32***

1ST CONSTITUTION BANCORP CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of 1st Constitution Bancorp (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Robert F. Mangano, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Joseph M. Reardon,as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

August 12, 2003

| /s/ ROBERT F. MANGANO                                                                                                             |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                   |   |
| **Robert F. Mangano  President and Chief Executive Officer 1st Constitution Bancorp**                                             |   |
|                                                                                                                              |   |
| /s/ JOSEPH M. REARDON                                                                                                             |   |
|                                                                                                                                   |   |
| **Joseph M. Reardon  Senior Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  1st Constitution Bancorp** |   |
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

October 5, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00473

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.W.C., A CHILD

, From the County Court, Jim Wells County, Texas Trial Court No. 11

- 06

- 50160

- CV Honorable David A. Sanchez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellee ’ s motion to dismiss appeal for want of prosecution is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the sai d court on this 5th day of October, 201 8

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### Hugh STEWART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-6682

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 15, 1994.

Darryl W. Hunt, Beth H. Gerwin, Clark & James, Birmingham, AL, for plaintiff-appellant.

Claude Harris, U.S. Atty., Linda S. Trippe, Asst. U.S. Atty., Birmingham, AL, for defendant-appellee.

Before HATCHETT, COX and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:

Hugh Stewart appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming the denial of his application for disability benefits and supplemental security income pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). Specifically, Stewart alleges that substantial evidence did not support the Secretary of Health and Human Service’s determination that he was not entitled to disability benefits. The Secretary contends that because Stewart did not file a brief with the district court or specify any grounds in his petition for judicial review, he waived his right to do so on appeal. Alternatively, the Secretary asserts that the administrative record reveals that substantial evidence supported her finding that Stewart is not entitled to disability benefits.

As a general principle, this court will not address an argument that has not been raised in the district court. *Baumann v. Savers Fed. Sav. & Loan*Assoc., 934 F.2d 1506, 1510 (11th Cir.1991). “Judicial economy is served and prejudice is avoided by binding the parties to the facts presented and the theories argued below.” *Bliss v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S.,*620 F.2d 65, 70 (5th Cir.1980); *also see Singleton v. Wulff,*428 U.S. 106, 120, 96 S.Ct. 2868, 2877, 49 L.Ed.2d 826 (1976) (“It is the general rule that a federal appellate court does not consider an issue not passed on below”). Although this court may hear an issue not raised in the lower court when the proper resolution is beyond any doubt, issues involv*116ing the resolution of factual questions can never be beyond doubt. *In re Daikin Miami Overseas,*868 F.2d 1201, 1207 (11th Cir.1989). We can ascertain no reason to deviate from this policy in the present case. Because Stewart did not present any of his assertions in the district court, we decline to consider them on appeal. *Commercial Credit Business Loans, Inc. v. St. Louis Terminal Field Warehouse Co.,*514 F.2d 75, 77 (5th Cir.1975).

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ John Kang                                               |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| John Kang, Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 30, 2005                                        |

 

----