alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## V E N D O R 

## P R O F I L E

Note: Information is from vendor, however specifications may have
changed. Contact vendor for updates. Water Treatment Catalog and Decision Tool



### E c o s p h e r e T e c h n o l o g i e s , I n c

.

Contact Information

Company Name: Ecosphere Technologies, Inc.

Profile: Ecosphere is a water engineering and services company that offers three water treatment options for shale gas producers:

Ozonix EcosFracTM , a process that is used prior to fracturing to remove bacteria to help reduce scaling and corrosion; Ozonix

EcosBrineTM , a mobile water recycling unit that treats flowback water for removal of heavy metals, organics and cations ; and an optional reverse osmosis system

. To date, Ecosphere has conducted a pilot program with Devon Energy Corporation in the Barnett Shale, Newf ield Exploration Mid

- Continent

, Inc

. in the

Woodford Shale and Southwestern Energy in the Fayetteville

shale

. Address: 3515 S.E. Lionel Terrace, Stuart, FL 34997

Phone: 772

- 287

- 4846

Website: http://www.ecospheretech.com/



### Treatment Technology

Category: Membrane and Microbe Removal

Subcategory: Reverse Osmosis /UV & Ozonation

Technology Name: Ozonix TM

Surface Footprint Approximately 380 ft 2

Process Description: Initial water treatment steps of the Ozonix process involves placing raw water into storage tanks to allow solids to settle, and then passing the water through a cartage filtration system to further reduce TSS. Scale inhibitors are then applied to reduce

s caling. Next, super

- saturated ozonated water is flash mixed with

the influent and d ual

- frequency ultrasonic transducers initiate the dissolved gas flotation of oils and suspended solids and the conversion of ozone to hydroxyl radicals. Nano

- cavitation

bubb les imploded to provide the liquid

- gas interface that is instantaneously heated to approximately 900 o F, which in turn

oxidi zes all known organic compounds. Ultrasonic cavitation cleaves larger particles into smaller particles for faster removal by flotation. The last step of the Ozonix process, if required, separates brine from fresh water by using RO technology

. Feedwater TDS/ % Water Recovery 20,000

– 30,000 mg/L, approximately 50%

- 70% water recovery

## V E N D O R 

## P R O F I L E

Note: Information is from vendor, however specifications may have
changed. Contact vendor for updates. Water Treatment Catalog and Decision Tool % Waste Stream:

Feed Capacity: EcoFrac TM

, 120 barrels per minute; EcosBrine TM

, 300 BBls per

hour , Ozonix (to include RO), 100 gpm.

Costs: EcosFracTM (pre

- treatment) : $0.60 to $0.75 per bbl;

EcosBrineTM : approximately $2.00 per bbl

Ozonix TM Process to include RO: $3.50

- $4.00 per bbl
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **4 -**  **65 60** 

CLINTON R. POWELL , Plaintiff

- Appell ant ,

v. DANA Y. KINSLEY, GRCC Law Library Supervisor; RONALD ABERNATHY, GRCC Food Operations Manager; BENJAMIN WRIGHT, GRCC Lead Warden; JIMMY EVERETTE, GRCC Administrative Staff Specialist , Defendant s - Appell ees .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Rebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 2 :1 2

- c v - 0 0372

- RBS

- DEM )

Submitted : July 24, 2014 Decided: July 29, 2014

Before FLOYD and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Clinton R. Powell , Appellant Pro Se

. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, Lara Kate Jacobs Todd, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia ; Daniel James Kelly, MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP, Boston, Massachusetts , for Appellee s .
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Clint on R. Powell appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Powell v. Kinsley , No. 2:12

- cv - 00372

- RBS

- DEM (E.D. Va.
Mar. 27, 2014) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to



Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the
Report) of MCG Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bryan J. Mitchell, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    BRYAN J. MITCHELLName: Bryan J. MitchellDate: August 4, 2005
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
**AUSTIN**

Honorable 7. G. Garza County Attorney Brooks'County Pelfurr~aa, Texas
Dear sir:

nthe above statly aonaldered by
art, as follows: exglanatioa of naythat our town dtherefore the or the upkeep oi the other tiscellaneous riattcrs; 

### etrairicii3

somewhat heavy ed at tlzes at the particular 0218above rcentioned, ths State partmnt has ayrsod to turnlsh 0likzhts provided that the oounty will pay for the li&t bill.”

pagee 563,Iie quote from Texaa Jurlspruaenoe, Volrnne ll,

564, 665, and566, as hollows: nCounties, bein aomgonent parts of the state, have nopozers or duties exoept those which are olcarly set 

### r0rthanddefined in the conaitution and statutes. Thestatutes have olearlpHonorable .y. G. Garza, Fage 2

defined the powers, presprlbed the dut1eo andlmpased the llabillties of the 

### o&missioners* oourts, the medium through whloh the dlrrerent oounties act, and from those statutes must come all ths authority vested in the oounties.

“The arants of powers to suoh governmental agenoles as counties, townships and sohool distrlots are generally more strlot$.y construed than are those to inoorporated munloipalitiee. The oonuaiasioners* court Is not vested with any general polioe power.

. ...*Coxmlssloners* courts are courts oi linited jurlsdlctloa, in that their authority extends only to matters psrtalning to the general welfare or their respective counties and that their powers are only those expressly 

### or lmpliedly 

### oonferred upon themby law,

- that Is, bythe ooastitution aad statutes or the state.w The exclusive jurlsdlotloa over State highways is placea in the State Rlghv:ay Commission by Art'lole 6673, Revised Civil Statutes of TexEs, whloh reads in part as **r0uw:**

_ *Artlole. 6673. Control of, Highways.

“The oomz~lsslon Is authorized to take over andmaintain various State highways in TBXRB,andthe counties 

### through whioh said highways pass shall be free iron any cost, 

### expense or super

### vision of suoh highways.” * * * After a.oareful andexhauetlve study or your question, re have been unable to rind any authority, expressed or Implied, whioh wouLdauthorize the County Com

### laissloaers of Brooks County, 

### Texas, to 

### RPPrOPriRte money to pay the light **bill** .that would be laourred 

### bymaiataia-

### 771

Iioaorable‘a. G. Garza, Fag93

in3 and'upkeeping two eleotrio trafrio lighta at tws Intereeotlons or two state hlghxaye lntersectlng la the heart of Palfurrias.

Therefore, you are respectfully advised that it 

### is the aplnloa of this 

### department that the Oounty Coaimissioaers’ Coui’t of Brooks County, Texm, does aot have.the authority, 

### expressed or implied, to expend the oounty fund6 Sor the purQo8e about ?rhiOhyou inquire.

TsYstlng.that the foregoing satisfaotorlly answers yopr 

### iaquirp, we 

### reada **Yours**very truly ATTORNEY

GErUiRAL

OFTXCAS

D. Burle DaYis Asslstaat

,ATTORURY

GRN?ClUL

OBTRXE3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; NINDS R35 Overflow Meeting.                    

*Date:*                         January 19, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         DeAnna Lynn Adkins, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NINDS/NIH NSC, 6001 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852, 301-496-9223,                         *deanna.adkins@nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

Dated: January 11, 2024.

Lauren A. Fleck, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-00794 Filed 1-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5098 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the notification to Congress of the hospitalization of combat-wounded members of the Armed 

Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2018 

Mr. SWALWELL of California (for himself and Ms. STEFANIK) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the 

notification to Congress of the hospitalization of combatwounded members of the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expanding Wounded 

5 in Action Notification Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5098 IH

1 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT TO THE NOTIFICATION TO OF HOS2 PITALIZATION OF COMBAT-WOUNDED MEM3 BERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

4 Section 1074l(a) of title 10, United States Code, is 

5 amended by striking ‘‘admitted to a military treatment fa6 cility within the United States’’ and inserting ‘‘admitted 

7 to any military treatment facility’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2



I, J. William Holden III, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, as amended, of
Mirant Americas Generation, LLC;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this amended quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this amended quarterly report; and

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this amended quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended
quarterly report.

                                          By:   /s/ J. WILLIAM HOLDEN III
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                   J. William Holden III
                                            Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial
                                                           Officer
                                                       and Treasurer
                                               (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: August 27, 2003
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6257]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           STAND UP FOR COAL

  (Mr. STUTZMAN asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mr. STUTZMAN. Mr. Speaker, I rise today on behalf of the men and 
women who have worked tirelessly to make Indiana the best place to do 
business in the Midwest.
  Coal produces the electricity that powers everything from 
manufacturing mainstays to small business startups. Mr. Speaker, coal-
fired electric power plants provided 83 percent of Indiana's net 
electricity generation in 2011.
  Rising energy prices are squeezing small businesses, entrepreneurs, 
and families. Unfortunately, President Obama's EPA has waged a war on 
coal. Unelected bureaucrats have proposed a series of sweeping 
regulations that would destroy jobs and decrease domestic energy 
production. As a result of Washington's overregulation, the Energy 
Information Administration expects the pace of coal-fired power plant 
shutdowns to increase fourfold in the next 5 years.
  Today we have an opportunity to stand up for the American coal 
industry and the families and businesses that rely on the electricity 
it provides. We can ensure that regulations are sensible and not 
overbearing. We can make sure that coal keeps lighting homes, stores 
and factories in Indiana.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Federal Register: September 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 183)]
[Notices]               
[Page 57828]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22se10-121]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

 
Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments; 
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: NAS Data 
Release Request

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA 
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information 
collection. The information enables the FAA to evaluate the validity of 
the user's request for National Airspace (NAS) data from FAA systems 
and equipment.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by November 22, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Scott on (202) 267-9895, or by 
e-mail at: Carla.Scott@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0668.
    Title: NAS Data Release Request.
    Form Numbers: FAA Form 1200-5.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: This data collection is the genesis for granting 
approval to release filtered NAS data. The information provided sets 
the criteria for the FAA Data Release Request Committee (DRRC) to 
approve or disapprove individual requests for NAS data. The information 
submitted by the requestor determines the requestor's eligibility to 
use FAA NAS data. The agency currently uses the collected information 
to determine suitability for procuring NAS data for use in various 
evaluations.
    Respondents: Approximately 15 data requestors.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 3 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 45 hours.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Carla 
Scott, Room 712, Federal Aviation Administration, IT Enterprises 
Business Services Division, AES-200, 800 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20591.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of 
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the 
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the 
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d) 
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of 
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include 
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information 
collection.

    Issued in Washington, DC on September 15, 2010.
Carla Scott,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business 
Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2010-23636 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<PAGE>

                     32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CEO
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund IV,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, George S. Springsteen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley ACT of 2002, that, to the best of knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ George S. Springsteen
-------------------------

George S. Springsteen
Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2004
#### BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY v. BANKERS INV. CO.

No. 36434.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 15, 1954.

Granville Scanland, County Atty., Nathan S. Sherman, Asst. County Atty., Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Washington & Thompson, Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

O’NEAL, Justice.

On December 1, 1953, the order overruling the motion for new trial was entered. Time in which to appeal expired thereafter on March 1, 1954. No order was entered by the trial court extending this time. The case-made was filed April 12, 1954.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason the appeal was not lodged in this court within the three months provided by 12 O.S. 1951 § 972. The motion must be sustained. In East Side Baptist Church v. Morgan, 204 Okl. 685, 233 P.2d 957, 958, it is stated:

> “Where the petition in error is not filed in this court until after the expiration of three months from the date of the final judgment complained of and no order is made by the trial court extending the time, this court has no-jurisdiction over the subject matter, and the appeal will be dismissed.”

See, also, Prusa v. Dolezal, 207 Okl. 373, 249 P.2d 1015, and Evans v. Wilcox, 208 Okl. 76, 253 P.2d 566.

Appeal dismissed.
Attachment 18

AMES Study Sanitized
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 23-5024 September Term, 2022

1:22-cv-03742-UNA

Filed On: April 10, 2023

Patrick O. Christian,

Appellant

v.

United States of America, et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Pillard and Childs, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit

Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s January 4, 2023 and

January 19, 2023 orders be affirmed. The district court correctly concluded that

appellant’s complaint, which lacked an arguable basis either in law or in fact, was

frivolous. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); see also 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (providing that “the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the

court determines that . . . the action or appeal . . . is frivolous or malicious”). And the

district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for post-judgment

relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See, e.g., Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d

661, 668 (D.C. Cir. 2004).
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 23-5024 September Term, 2022

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Michael C. McGrail 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.4 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his
capacity as an officer of Emmis Operating Company (the Company), that, to his
knowledge:  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period
ended November 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Date: May 14, 2004 /s/
    
    WALTER Z. BERGERWalter Z. BergerExecutive Vice President, Treasurer and ChiefFinancial Officer
 11