alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4855 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4855

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to provide an incentive for 
   households participating in the supplemental nutrition assistance 
 program to purchase certain nutritious fruits and vegetables that are 
                       beneficial to good health.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2018

 Mr. Cartwright (for himself, Mr. Pocan, Ms. DeLauro, Ms. Pingree, Ms. 
  Moore, Mr. Cicilline, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, Mr. Cardenas, Ms. 
Slaughter, Mr. Takano, Ms. Kaptur, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Ms. 
  Sewell of Alabama, Mr. Polis, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Ms. 
Wilson of Florida, Ms. Norton, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Amodei, Mr. 
Soto, Ms. Clarke of New York, Ms. Shea-Porter, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, 
  and Mr. Lawson of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to provide an incentive for 
   households participating in the supplemental nutrition assistance 
 program to purchase certain nutritious fruits and vegetables that are 
                       beneficial to good health.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SNAP Healthy Incentives Act of 
2018''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Definition.--Section 3 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 
U.S.C. 2012) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (k) by inserting ``, unless the context 
        specifies otherwise,'' after ``means'';
            (2) by redesignating subsections (u) and (v) as subsections 
        (v) and (w), respectively; and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (t) the following:
    ``(u) `Supplemental fruits and vegetables' means those fruits and 
vegetables containing nutrients that promote the health of the 
population served by the supplemental nutrition assistance program, as 
determined by the Secretary by rule.''.
    (b) Increase in Value of Allotment.--Section 8 of the Food and 
Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2017) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
    ``(g) Increase in Value of Allotment.--The value of an allotment, 
determined under this section without regard to this subsection and 
issued to a household for a month, shall be increased by 30 percent of 
the cost of supplemental fruits and vegetables purchased by such 
household during such month, but not to exceed an aggregate monthly 
amount determined by the Secretary on the basis of household size.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on 
October 1, 2018.
                                 <all>
```
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T I n r e : J A M ES BY RO N H O LCO M B, J A M ES BY RO N H O LCO M B, R e s p o n d e n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 35796 D. C. No s . 2 : 0 7 - r d - 0 0 0 1 - RS L; 3: 10- m c - 05020 ME MOR AN DU M * A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on R obe rtS . L a s ni k, C hi e f J udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry17, 2012 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T A L L M A N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jam es B yr on H ol com b app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ctcourt ’ s order i m pos i ng r e c i pr oc a l di s c i pl i ne on hi m ba s e d on H ol c om b’ s s us pe ns i on f r om the pr a c t i c e of

l a w bythe W a s hi ngt on S upr e m e C ourt . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w f ora n abus e of

di s c r e t i on, In re C orri net , 645 F . 3d



# FI LED JAN 25 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 35796 2 1 1 4 1 , 1 1 4 5 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 1 1 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtdi d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n i m po si ng re ci procal di s c i pl i ne a ga i ns tH ol c om b be c aus e he f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h byc l e a ra nd c onvi nc i ng e vi de nc e tha the w a s de pr i ve d of due pr oc e s s ; tha tthe r e w a s i ns uf f i c i e ntpr oof

of the m i sc on du ctthatre sul t ed i n h i s s t i pu l at ed suspensi on fr om the st at e bar ; or that g r a v e in ju s tic e w o u ldr e s u lt f

r o m th e im p o s itio n o f

r e c ip r o c a l d is c ip lin e . See In re Kram er , 28 2 F . 3d72 1, 72 4 (9th C i r. 20 02 ) ( l i st i ng l i m i t ed grou nd s f or an att orney s ubj e c tt o di s c i pl i ne bya nothe rc ourtt o a voi d af e de r a l c ourt ’ s i m pos i t i on of r e c ip r o c a l d is c ip lin e , an ds e ttin g f o rth a tto rn e y ’s b u r d e n ) ; s e e al s o I n r e R os e nthal , 854 F . 2d 1187, 1188 ( 9th C i r . 1988) ( pe rc ur i a m ) ( s t a t e c ourtdi s c i pl i na ryf i ndi ngs ar e e nt i t l ed t o a pres um pt i on of corr ec tness abse nta s ho w i ng of error) . H ol com b’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s, i ncl ud i ng tho se concerni ng re ci procal d is c ip lin e b e in g b a rr e db yr e s ju d ic a tao rc o lla te r a l e s to p p e l, a r e u n p e r s u a s iv e . AF F I RME D.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Colony RIH Holdings, Inc. and Resorts International Hotel and Casino, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark B. Lefever, Senior Vice President Finance/CFO and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MARK B. LEFEVER                                              
|Mark B. Lefever                                                  
|Senior Vice President Finance/CFO and Principal Financial Officer
|                                                                 
|August 11, 2005
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel CARVAJAL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-7451

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 17, 1993.

Miguel Carvajal, pro se.

Peggy Ronca, Paula C. Offenhauser, Asst. U.S. Attys., Ronald G. Woods, U.S. Atty., Houston, TX, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Miguel Carvajal appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for grand jury transcripts. His appeal is frivolous. *See*5th Cir.Loc.R. 42.2.

Carvajal provides no jurisdictional basis for his motion to inspect the grand jury minutes. The judgment convicting Carva-jal has been entered. He did not directly appeal that judgment. The merits of his § 2255 motion have also been addressed by the district court and dismissed when the district court denied his motion. Because the cause was terminated, the district court lacked jurisdiction to grant his motion requesting grand jury transcripts. *See, e.g., First Nationwide Bank v. Summer House Joint Venture,*902 F.2d 1197, 1199 (5th Cir.1990).

More important, Carvajal did not allege in his § 2255 motion, nor does he now specifically allege, any irregularity in the grand jury proceedings. It is well established that this Court need not consider arguments on appeal that were not raised before the district court in a § 2255 petition. *See United States v. Cates,*952 F.2d 149, 152 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 2319, 119 L.Ed.2d 238 (1992). Grand jury proceedings are normally secret; Carvajal cannot now conduct a fishing expedition to see if he can find something in the grand jury minutes that might support further relief under § 2255. *See United States v. Short,*671 F.2d 178, 183-187 (6th Cir.), *cert. denied,*457 U.S. 1119, 102 S.Ct. 2932, 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982).

The appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          29,914
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  470,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           3,229
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,197
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 526,113
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          172,018
<BONDS>                                        260,638
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,660
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   526,113
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,819
<CGS>                                            8,302
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,873
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   143
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,501
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,496
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,005
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,005
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 164 (Friday, August 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52512-52513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20625]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List Proposed Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed additions to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to add products and a service to 
the Procurement List that will be furnished by nonprofit agencies 
employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

DATES: Comments Must be Received on Or Before: 9/23/2013.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 10800, Arlington, Virginia, 
22202-4149.

For Further Information or to Submit Comments Contact: Barry S. 
Lineback, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email 
CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503 (a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Additions

    If the Committee approves the proposed additions, the entities of 
the Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to 
procure the products and service listed below from nonprofit agencies 
employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    The following products and service are proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List for production by the nonprofit agencies listed:

Products

NSN: MR 10635--Serving Platter, Heavy Duty, Raised Surface, Fall 
Themed, White
NSN: MR 382--Duct Tape, Holiday Themed, Assorted Colors
NSN: MR 377--Socks, Holiday

[[Page 52513]]

NPA: Winston-Salem Industries for the Blind, Inc., Winston-Salem, NC
Contracting Activity: Defense Commissary Agency, Fort Lee, VA
Coverage: C-List for the requirements of military commissaries and 
exchanges as aggregated by the Defense Commissary Agency.

Service

Service Type/Location: Janitorial Service, US Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge, 6550 
Gateway Road, Commerce City, CO.
NPA: North Metro Community Services for Developmentally Disabled, 
Westminster, CO
Contracting Activity: Dept of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Contracting and General Services DIV, Denver, CO

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013-20625 Filed 8-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
1

Parker, Joshua (FAA)

From: Parker, Joshua (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 2:48 PM

To: 'neilinman@icloud.com'

Subject: Request for Information Inman Endeavor (FAA-2015-4872)

Dear Mr. Inman: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-4872). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

By letter posted to the public docket on October 23, 2015, you, on behalf of Inman Endeavors, petitioned the 

FAA for an exemption seeking relief from part 21, §§ 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 61.3 (d)(2)(iii), 91.7(a) and 

(b), 91.9(b)(2), 91.103, 91.109, 91.119 (b) and (c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a) and (b), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). Additionally, 

the petition requested relief to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) at night utilizing night-vision goggles and 

high resolution IR capabilities. 

Your letter of petition states, in part, “The use of night-vision goggles in conjunction with a high resolution IR 

camera mounted on a UAS will enable the PIC to maintain visual line of sight on the aircraft and surrounding 

hazards at night.” However, a safety case is required for nighttime operations by Order 8900.1, Volume 16, 

Chapter 5, Section 3, Paragraph 16-5-3-7(I). The required components of a safety case and safety case format 

may be found in Order 8900.1, Volume 16, Chapter 7, Section 1, Paragraph 16-7-1-3.You must include a safety 

case or specific operating procedures on how you plan to use that technology to maintain an equivalent level of 

safety at night. Examples include, but are not limited to, crew qualifications and responsibilities, safety 

mitigations to avoid a collision at night, aircraft lighting systems, emergency procedures, dark adaptation to 

night flight, supplemental illumination for filming area and/or the control station, or procedures to ensure the 

illumination does not degrade the dark adaptation of the pilot or visual observer. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your 

information is submitted, please save your tracking number and submit your tracking number along with the 

information submitted to the docket, and any proprietary information electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by February 10, 2016. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999. 

Sincerely, 

Joshua	Parker	

Program	Analyst	

Office	of	Rulemaking		

800	Independence	Ave	SW.,	Suite	812	

Washington,	DC		20591	

Joshua.parker@faa.gov
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-2564

___________ Debry Allyn La Near, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. Frances R. Slay, Mayor for the * City of St. Louis; Board of Police * [UNPUBLISHED] Commissioners of the City of St. * Louis; Christopher Goodson, Col.; * JoAnn Freeman-Morrow, Col.; * Michael J. Quinn, Col.; Julius * Hunter, Col.; Amy Fiala, Sgt. * (Sprout) Metropolitan Police Dept. * for the City of St. Louis; John * Gregory Stempf, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 2, 2009 Filed: October 28, 2009

___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -2- Debry Allyn La Near appeals the district court 1 orders concluding that certain claims in her civil action were time-barred under a five-year statute of limitations, and denying her motions for appointed counsel. After carefully reviewing the record and considering La Near’s arguments, we find no basis for reversal. See Phillips v. Jasper County Jail , 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir. 2006) (denial of motion for appointed counsel is reviewed fo r abuse of discretion); Eichenwald v. Small , 321 F.3d 733, 736 (8th Cir. 2003) (district court’s application of state’s statute of limitations is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Exhibit 3.48
     Registered Office.
 Other Offices.
   Time and Place of Meetings.
 Annual Meetings.
 Special Meetings.
 Notice.




---



##### 



Quorum.
 Voting.
 Method of Voting.
 Action Without Meeting.
 2




---



##### 



Responsibilities.
 Number: Term.
 Vacancies: Increases.
 Place of meetings.
 Regular Meetings.
 3




---



##### 



Special Meetings.
 Quorum: Majority Vote.
 Minutes.
 Committees.
 Committee Minutes.
 Action Without Meeting.
 4




---



##### 



Method.
 Waiver.
   Number.
 Appointed Officers.
 Removal.
 Compensation.
 5




---



##### 



Duties.
         Checks.
 6




---



##### 



Fiscal Year.
 Telephone and Similar Meetings.
 Distributions and Share Dividends.
 Amendment of Bylaws.
 7
THE STATE OF TEXAS 

### M A N D A T E

TO THE 187TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on July 29, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise

or reverse your judgment between

Raymond Zapata, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04

- 15

- 00385

- CR and Tr. Ct. No. 2014CR6346

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:



## In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is

DISMISSED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on September 28, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
Exhibit 10.20 - Letter Agreement relating to the Brookdale Tax Matters Agreement.



Exhibit
10.20




Provident
Senior Living Trust

600
College Road East, Suite 3400

Princeton,
NJ 08540




March 28,
2005




Fortress
Brookdale Acquisition LLC

c/o
Fortress Investment Group LLC

1251
Avenue of the Americas, 16th
Floor

New York,
New York 10020

Attention:
Mr. Randal A. Nardone




Brookdale
Living Communities, Inc.

330 North
Wabash Avenue, Suite 1400

Chicago,
Illinois 60611

Attention:
General Counsel




Ladies
and Gentlemen:




Reference
is made to that certain Tax Matters Agreement dated as of June 18, 2004 (the
“Tax
Agreement”), by
and among Fortress Brookdale Acquisition LLC (“Seller”),
Provident Senior Living Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust
(“Acquiror”), and
Brookdale Living Communities, Inc., formerly known as BLC Senior Holdings, Inc.
(“Indemnitor”).





The
parties hereto hereby agree that the first sentence of Section 3(g) of the Tax
Agreement is hereby deleted. 




Except as
expressly provided herein, (i) the Tax Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect, and (ii) no party hereto makes any amendment, alteration or modification
of the Tax Agreement nor does any party hereto waive any provision of the Tax
Agreement or any right that it may have thereunder.










PROVIDENT
SENIOR LIVING TRUST

 




	
      By:
	/s/ Darryl W. Copeland,
Jr.



Darryl W.
Copeland, Jr.

Chief
Executive Officer 


 




















 



Fortress
Brookdale Acquisition LLC

Brookdale
Living Communities, Inc.

March 28,
2005

Page
2







 

Acknowledged and agreed as of 



the date
first written above:




FORTRESS
BROOKDALE ACQUISITION LLC

 




	
      By:
	/s/ William B.
Doniger



Name:
William B. Doniger

Title:
Vice President




BROOKDALE
LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC.

 




	
      By:
	/s/ R. Stanley
Young





Name: R.
Stanley Young

Title:
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

Copies
to:




Skadden
Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP

Four
Times Square

New York,
New York 10036

Attention: Joseph A.
Coco, Esq.

Facsimile: (212)
735-2000




Sidley
Austin Brown & Wood LLP

787
Seventh Avenue

New York,
New York 10019

Attention: Robert L.
Golub, Esq.

Facsimile: (212)
839-5599




Winston
& Strawn LLP

35 West
Wacker Drive

Chicago,
Illinois 60601

Attention: Brendan
P. Head, Esq.

Facsimile: (312)
558-5700