ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-0AR-2010-0150-201009(a); FRL- ]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans: Tennessee; Visibility Impairment

Prevention for Feder,al Class I Areas; Removal of Federally Promulgated Provisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct fmal action to rescind the federally promulgated

provisions regarding visibility in 40 CFR 52.2234 of the Tennessee State Implementation

Plan (SIP). EPA approved Tennessee's visibility rules addressing new source review

(NSR) on July 18, 1996, and a plan addressing monitoring and reporting of visibility on

July 2, 1997. EPA's approval of these rules neglected to remove the previous federally

promulgated provisions from the Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) contained in 40 CFR

52.2234. EPA is correcting this omission in this rulemaking.

DATES: This rule is effective on [Insert date 60 days from date of publication in the

Federal Register] without further notice, unless EPA receives relevant adverse comment

by [Insert date 30 days from date of publication in the Federal Registerl. If EPA receives

such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing

the public that this rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ill No. EPA-R04-0AR2010-0150, by one of the following methods:

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.

2. E-mail: benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov.

. 3. Fax: (404) 562-9019.

4. Mail: "EPA-R04-0AR-201O-0150," Regulatory Development Section, Air

Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Taxies Management Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia

30303-8960.

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory Development

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4,61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia

30303-8960. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal

hours of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday

through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal holidays.

Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. "EPA-R04-0AR-2010-0150."

EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without

change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, induding any

personal information provided, unless the comment includes infonnation claimed to be

Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is

restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or e-mail, information

that you consider to beiCBI or otherwise protected. The www.regulations.gov Web site

2
is an "anonymous access" system, which means EPA will not know your identity or

contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your e-mail

address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed

in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic

comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in

the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot

read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification,

EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of

special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For

additional information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage

at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.

Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov

index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, Le., CBI

or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material,

such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available

only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either

electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Regulatory Development

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4,61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia

30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the person listed in the

.FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection.

3
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to

4:30, excluding federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nacosta C. Ward, Regulatory

Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW,

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Ms. Ward may be reached by phone at (404) 562-9140 or

by electronic mail address ward.nacosta@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Background for Today's Action

II. Final Action

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background for Today's Action

On February 9, 1993, and December 19, 1994, the State of Tennessee submitted

provisions constituting its plan to address visibility impairment in Federal Class I areas.

EPA approved these submittals on July 2, 1997 (62 FR 35681). On January 17, 1995, the

State of Tennessee also submitted rules for addressing visibility in its NSR program.

EPA fully approved this submittal on July 18,1996 (61 FR 35387).

The aforementioned submittals provide the necessary revisions to Tennessee's

plan for visibility impairment prevention for Class I. areas, and satisfied EPA's

4
requirements as set forth in 40 CFR 51.300 through 51.304 and 51.306. These visibility

provisions were submitted to EPA in order to satisfy the second part of the Settlement

Agreement with the Environmental Defense Fund. et al., EnvironmentaL Defense Fund v.

Thomas, number C826850 RPA, and are described at 49 FR 20647 on May 16, 1984.

The schedule for submittal and promulgation of these visibility provisions was

renegotiated and subsequently extended by a court order on September 9, 1986.

The second part of the Settlement Agreement required EPA to propose and

promulgate Federal Visibility SIPs. addressing the general visibility plan provisions

including implementation control strategies (40 CFR 51.302), integral vista protection

(40 CFR 51.302 through 51.307). and long-term strategies (40 CFR 51.306) for those

states whose SIPs EPA had determined to be inadequate with respect to the above

provisions (see January 23. 1986. notice of deficiency (51 FR 3046) and March 12, 1987,

notice proposing FIPs for deficient State SIPs (52 FR 7803)). However. as provided in

the renegotiated Settlement Agreement, a state could avoid the promulgation of said

provisions if they submitted a visibility SIP by August 31, 1987. The State of Tennessee

did not submit a plan by August 31. 1987, and as a result EPA promulgated Pan 2

provisions for Tennessee in a FIP to satisfy the Settlement Agreement on November 24,

1987.

Subsequently, the State ofTennessee provided SIP revisions on February 9, 1993,

December 19, 1994, and January 17. 1995, with the intent to replace the EPApromulgated provisions (or FIP) that was put in place. The EPA actions on July 18, 1996

and July 2. 1997, fully approved these Tennessee SIP revisions but inadvertently did not

5
remove the federally-promulgated provisions in 40 CFR 52.2234. Today's action

corrects that oversight.

II. Final Action

EPA is taking direct final action to correct an omission related to the visibility

requirements for Tennessee. Specifically, EPA is removing the previous federally

promulgated provisions in 40 CFR 52.2234 for visibility for Tennessee because the State

later submitted, and EPA approved, revisions covering visibility requirements for

Tennessee. EPA is approving the aforementioned ·changes to the Tennessee SIP because

they are consistent with the CAA and Agency requirements. EPA is publishing this rule

without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and

anticipates no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal

Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the

proposal to approve the SIP revision should adverse comments be filed..This rule will be

effective [Insert date 60 days from the date of publication) without further notice unless

the Agency receives adverse comments by [Insert date 30 days from date of publicationl.

If EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document withdrawing

the fmal rule and informing the public that the rule will not take effect. All public

comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Parties interested in

commenting should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is

advised that this rule will be effective on [Insert date 60 days from date of publication]

and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule.

6
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP

submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal

regulations. 42 U.S.c. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,

EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean

Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal

requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state

law. For that reason, this action:

• is not a "significant regulatory action" subject to review by the Office of

Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,

1993);

• does not impose aninfonnation collection burden under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.c. 3501 et seq.);

• is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of

small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.c. 601 et seq.);

• does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small

governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Refonn Act of 1995

(Public Law 104-4);

• does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64

FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

• is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks

subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);

7
• is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR

28355, May 22, 2001);

• is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology

Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.c. 272 note) because application

of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and

• does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate,

disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and

legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,

February 16, 1994).

In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order

13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in

Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial

direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.c. 801 et seq., as added by the Small

Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a

rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which

includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller

General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other .

required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the'

Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal

Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal

Register. This action is not a "major rule" as defmed by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

8
Under section 307(b)( 1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this

action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by

[FEDERAL REGISTER OFFICE: insert date 60 days from date of publication of this

document in the Federal Register]. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the

Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes

ofjudicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review

may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness ofsuch rule or action. Parties with

objections to this direct fmal rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the

parallel notice of proposed rulemakipg for this action published in the proposed rules

section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial

review of this direct fmal rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct fmal rule and address

the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in

proceedings to enforce its requirements~ (See section 307(b)(2)).

9
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations,

Incorporation by reference, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, Volatile organic compounds, Sulfur dioxide.

APR - 1 2010 Dated: _

y

Acting Regional Administrator.

Region 4.

10
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52-[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart RR - Tennessee

2. Section 52.2234 is being amended to read as follows:

§52.2234 [Reserved]

11