alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                           State  or  Country
Name                                        of  Incorporation

Century  Casinos  Management,  Inc.               Delaware
Century  Casinos  -  Nevada,  Inc.                  Nevada
Century  Management  und  Beteiligungs  GmbH       Austria
Century  Casinos  Cripple  Creek,  Inc.           Colorado
WMCK  Acquisition  Corp.                          Delaware
WMCK  Venture  Corp.                              Delaware
Century  Casinos  Africa  (Pty)  Limited        South  Africa
Century  Casinos  Caledon  (Pty)  Limited       South  Africa
Century  Casinos  West  Rand  (Pty)  Limited    South  Africa
Rhino  Resort  Limited                          South  Africa

                                        1
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Patrick Soon-Shiong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 9, 2006 |  | /s/ PATRICK SOON-SHIONG
|                       |  | Patrick Soon-Shiong    
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to
be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1409

SHIRWA ALI GAAS,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: November 19, 2021 Decided: January 4, 2022

Before MOTZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marc Sequinót, SEGUINÓT & ASSOCIATES, PC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Petitioner. Brian 

Boynton, Assistant Attorney General, Sabatino F. Leo, Assistant Director, Margot L. 

Carter, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shirwa Ali Gaas, a native and citizen of Somalia, petitions for review of an order of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the immigration 

judge’s (IJ) decision denying his application for a waiver of inadmissibility under 

Immigration and Nationality Act § 212(h), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h)(1). The Board affirmed the 

IJ’s finding that Gaas did not establish that his removal would cause an exceptional and 

extremely unusual hardship under 8 C.F.R. § 1212.7(d). The Board also affirmed the IJ’s 

alternate finding that Gaas was ineligible for a waiver of inadmissibility as a matter of 

discretion. We dismiss the petition for review. 

Gaas asserts that 8 C.F.R. § 1212.7(d) does not apply to a waiver of inadmissibility 

under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h)(1)(A). We need not decide that question. Gaas does not 

challenge the Board’s alternate dispositive finding that his application for a waiver would 

be denied as a matter of discretion and has abandoned that claim. See Suarez-Valenzuela v. 

Holder, 714 F.3d 241, 248-49 (4th Cir. 2013) (failure to raise claim in opening brief 

triggers abandonment of that claim, citing Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9)); see also Boggala v. 

Sessions, 866 F.3d 563, 570 (4th Cir. 2018) (declining to review application of § 1212.7(d) 

because Boggala did not challenge the discretionary denial of relief). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
We have pr eviously overr uled the co u rt re p o rter’ s late cha lleng e to the trial c ourt’s 1 d e t e r m i n at i o no f

i n d i g e n c y. 

### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-05-00292- CV Alejandro P ere z and Bob bie P ere z, Appellants

v. Em bree C onstruction Gr oup, I nc., Appellee
F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY , 51ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. A-01- 1086 -C, H ONO RAB LE THO MAS J. GO SSETT, JUDGE PRESI DING

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Be cause this appeal has prese nted ong oing problems in se curinga complete rec ord, we will abate this appea l. Appellants have filed a motion to supplement the cle rk’s re cord a nd court 1 repor ter’s rec ord, by which they asser t they have e x amined the r ecor d filed to date a nd it does not comply with their designation. SeeTex. R. App. P . 34.5(c) , .6. After approximately

thirty day s, we have r ece ived no re sponse to this mot ion. We gr ant the m o t i o nand dire ct that the re cord be2

supplemented in accorda

nce with appellants’ motion. We abate the appe al until March 1, 2006, at wh ic h ti me the a

pp e a l is re ins tate d. Ap pe lla nts ’ b ri e f i s d

ue thi rt y da y s f ro m th e re ins tate me nt.

__________________________________________ W. Kenneth L aw, Chief Justice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces B . A. Smith and Pury ear Abated Filed: De cembe r 22, 2005
Exhibit 23.1
 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50324

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HENRY VILLANUEVA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:08-CR-232-6

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Henry Villanueva

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Villanueva has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50324 Document: 00513882952 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
No. 16-50324

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-50324 Document: 00513882952 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
**Exhibit 10.22****Digene Corporation Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy**          Under the current Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy of Digene Corporation (“Digene”),each non-employee director is entitled to receive: **•** an annual retainer fee of $10,000 and an additional annual retainer of $5,000 for theAudit Committee Chair and $2,500 for the Compensation Committee Chair;  **•** a fee of $2,500 for each of the first six Board meetings attended in person, and $2,000for each additional Board meeting attended in person in each fiscal year and $1,000 foreach in-person Board meeting attended by conference telephone. In the event there arefewer than six meetings of the Board in a fiscal year, the minimum annual Board meeting feeis $15,000, less $2,500 for each Board meeting not attended in person;  **•** a fee of $1,000 for each telephonic Board meeting lasting longer than thirty minutes;  **•** a fee of $1,000 for each Audit or Compensation Committee meeting attended in personother than those committee meetings held in conjunction with in-person Board meetings;  **•** a fee of $500 for each telephonic Audit or Compensation Committee meeting lasting longerthan thirty minutes;  **•** a fee of $500 for each Nominating and Corporate Governance or Compliance Committeemeeting attended in person other than those committee meetings held in conjunction within-person Board meetings;  **•** a fee of $250 for each telephonic Nominating and Corporate Governance or ComplianceCommittee meeting lasting longer than thirty minutes;  **•** an initial grant of options to purchase 20,000 shares of Digene common stock upon firstjoining the Board and an annual grant, to each non-employee director who will continue toserve as a director after the annual meeting of Digene stockholders, of options to purchase10,000 shares of Digene common stock as an automatic grant under Digene’s Amended andRestated Directors’ Stock Option Plan; and  **•** reimbursement for all reasonable travel expenses incurred in connection with Board ofDirectors’ meetings and meetings of committees of the Board of Directors.          As disclosed in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Digene on August 3, 2005, Digene’sBoard of Directors has approved a revised non-employee director compensation policy. The revisedpolicy will be effective immediately following Digene’s 2005 annual stockholders meeting, which isscheduled to be held on October 26, 2005. Certain of the changes to the policy are subject tostockholder approval of amendments to Digene’s Amended and Restated Directors’ Stock Option Plan atthe 2005 annual stockholders meeting.
## - R eg ul ato r y Eva luati o n

Docke t N o . 

### FAA

# 2ot S"=-ltiM- 07'g

- AS\ 

### Directorate Identifie r : -AD ' I..1.J ( [
. FO il m a k e clwnges to th e valu es in th e wb l e h e/ow , yo u 

### nwsl e ns u r e th e t o t a ls update a c:cv rd ingly. (/ 

### th ey do n ot, d ick (o r T a b

) int o a nd th en o u t of th e c:lum g e d ce ll. Es tim a t ed Costs: Action Costs p e r P r odu c t (e
. g. , aircraft, e ng ine, (e
. g . , In s pection , propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labo r Parts C o s t T ota l C osts Number of Tota l Co s t replac e me nt) (i nclude cost (labo r + 

# u.s. for U
. S
. Fl eet Do n o t includ e on condit i o n cos t s h e r e access , testi n g , ( @ $85/h parts) Reg is t ere d a n d cl ose-up) our) P r od u cts 

## I HSpeetiorr r.o--'**~** ' I 

# - 148 I 

## In stalla ti on

# ~r; ". {I• I 

### $ 1 00, 0 00. • I 

## ' • it**~** I I 

### 38 fsU**~** II i t•J 

# . ') "II 

# . ' 

# .. ; \ II 'I; I I I !I <



### ., II (\I I I til ' !' •**'~'** 

### ,, l '-· " II t1 'I 

### r: Ill' \tit 

### ' .II 1, iJ•I I'P • j 1'! l 0• 1 II Oil 

### •l' I• 

# " I) (JIJ ' 'I l: IJ 

### ., 

## ' 11\li () I •I' )II I) II! ., 'II) •, f' i}li I 

# . 

# .. ' ''I •, 

## ,, 

# .,,, '• I II ') lj();l 

### ' 

# ''·"' ' li lli' {illil '1', 

# ,, 

# ,, , ' 

# . I ,.,



### ., 

# "
T he known number 

## of product s 

### in complianc e : 

### 0 T o tal Co sts of c o mplianc e f o r 

### U.S
. fle e t : S4, 7 72 , 2 J O Cos t s co vere d u nder 

### warranty (if/mown ) $
On -C o n diti o n C os t s :

# ~ Action Wo rk- h o urs L ab or cos t Pa rt s Cos t Cost p er Produc t (e.g., I n s p ec tion , (include access , (@$85/ho u r) tes t ing, a n d closerep l acement) up) ' 'l f:t. 

# ..: I 1'(1



### ''" 

### '• \ lo ;, 

### S p ecial cons i deratio n s f or E co nom ic A n a l ys is (Use this field to e xplain anything in t he Estima ted 

### Costs table that**wa~** assumed or might n ot b e 

### obvio us. Thisfield can also be us e d to explain warranty cos t s):

### Executive Order 12866: 

### Could the AD be co n s id ered a "s ignificant regulatory



# ac **ti "?~**  YES* 

# D NO 

# IZl *Ex planation: DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is 

### the AD significant?



# ~ YES * 

# D

**NO~** 

### *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

### Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a s ub stantial number of s m all entities? Expla in for either a Yes or No



# answe **.~**

**·** YESD

**NO~** 

### Ex planation: Intrastate Aviation 

### in Alaska: 

### This AD 

### could affect intrasta te aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate to includ e specific requirements for aircraft operated in A la ska where aviation might be the on l y mode of transportation? 

## @ , YES*0

**NO~** 

### *Explanation:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      19,694,420
<SECURITIES>                                									0		
<RECEIVABLES>                                			60,083
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,754,503
<PP&E>                                     112,205,300
<DEPRECIATION>                             (12,289,925)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             121,518,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,973,904
<BONDS>                                     39,896,598
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,943,820
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               121,518,386
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,895,254
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,808,391
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,352,767
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,734,096
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,734,096
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,734,096
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amended Registration Statement on Form S-3 ofLocal.com Corporation of our report dated March 7, 2008, appearing in the Annual Report on Form10-K of Local.com Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007 and to the reference to us underthe heading “Experts” in the Prospectus, which is part of this Amended Registration Statement.                                                                    /s/ HASKELL & WHITE LLP     Irvine, California
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Myoffiz, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jaren Chan Eng Ann, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By   /s/  Jaren Chan Eng Ann

Jaren Chan Eng Ann

Chief Executive Officer





March 17, 2004
EXHIBIT 11
 US DIAGNOSTIC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                YEAR ENDED              YEAR ENDED
                                                                   1996                   1995
                                                                ----------              ---------

                                                             (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:
<S>                                                              <C>                     <C>
Primary Weighted Average Shares of Common Stock
and Common Stock Equivalents Outstanding                           13,576                  4,996
                                                                 ========                =======

Net Income (Loss)                                                $ (6,331)               $ 3,331
                                                                 ========                =======

Earnings (Loss) Per Share - Primary                              $   (.47)               $   .67
                                                                 ========                =======

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE: (1)

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                                13,576                  4,996
Dilutive Effect of Assumed Warrant Conversions                     10,886                  6,765
                                                                 --------                -------

Fully Diluted  Weighted  Average Shares of Common Stock
and Common Stock Equivalents Outstanding                           24,462                 11,761
                                                                 ========                =======

Net Income (Loss)                                                $ (6,331)               $ 3,331

Adjustments to Net Income for Interest Savings                      2,837                  3,682
                                                                 --------                -------

Adjusted Net Income (Loss)                                       $ (3,494)               $ 7,013
                                                                 ========                =======

Earnings (Loss) Per Share - Fully Diluted                        $   (.14)               $   .60
                                                                 ========                =======
<FN>
----------
(1)  This calculation is submitted for 1996 in accordance with Regulation S-K
     Item 601(b)(11) although it is contrary to paragraph 40 of APB Opinion No.
     15 because it produces an anti-dilutive result.
</FN>
</TABLE>
FOR DOCKET;Fw: Tailoring rule step 3 - Technical Support Documents for 

review

Juan Santiago to: Pam Long 02/24/2012 02:02 PM

From: Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Pam Long/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

----- Forwarded by Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/24/2012 02:02 PM -----

From: Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Frey, Nathan J." <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>, "Ghorbi, Darian" 

<Darian_E_Ghorbi@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Anna Wood/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>, 

Pam Long/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, MichaelS Brooks/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lynn 

Hutchinson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/16/2012 09:30 AM

Subject: Tailoring rule step 3 - Technical Support Documents for review

Good morning Darian and Nathan,

Per your office's request, attached are the 2 technical support documents presenting the step 3 

rulemaking thresholds and emissions coverage analysis. In addition, I will be forwarding you the 

regulatory text that will be included in the docket for your review around lunch time today.

Please don't hesitate to contact me if there are any questions.

Thanks!

Juan E. Santiago

(919) 541-1084

TS3 Threshold Analysis TSD Draft Clean.docx

Step 3 Burden TSD Clean Draft.docx
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

# ~~~~~--t""''JRECE

# IVED
IN THE MATTER OF CEBU AIR, INC. d/b/a Cebu Pacific Air, Inc. DOCKET NO. FAA 2014-0414 (Civil Penalty Action) 

## SEP 262014 

## HEARING DOCKET

NOTICE TO WITHDRAW REQUEST FORHEARING

HON. RICHARD C. GOODWIN U.S. Administrative Law)udge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (El1-310) Washington, D.C. 20590 Attn: PatriciaMatthews (Richard.Goodwin@dot.gov) Respondent CEBU AIR, INC. (trading as Cebu Pacific Air/Cebu Pacific), through its undersigned President and ChiefExecutive Officer, hereby gives notice to withdraw its request for hearing pursuant to, and in accordance with 14 C.P.R. § 13.215 1

.

1 14 C.F.R. § 13.215 Withdrawal ofcomplaint or request for hearing. At any time before or during hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint or a party may withdraw a request for**~,earing** withopt.the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws 'the'request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative judge shall dismiss the proceedings undefthis subp.8.rt with prbjudice. 1RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. Pasay City, Philippines, for Washington, D.C., United States ofAmerica, 12 September 2014.

LAN 

### President/C ief E cutive Officer CEBU AI , INC (Cebu Pacific) Airline Operations Center Domestic Road, Pasay City, Philippines 1301 Attn: Anne Romadine P. Tieng (Ap.Tieng@cebupacificair.com) Tel: +632-854-0226
Copy Furnished: FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 CAREY TERASAKI 

### Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Connsel, APW-7.1 Federal Aviation Administration Western-Pacific Region POBox92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 Tel: 310-725-7108 Fax: 310-725-6816 RICK FELLER 

### President, U-Freight America, Inc. 320 Corey Way San Francisco, CA 94080 Tel: 650-583-6527 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

FRANK NELLOM,

Petitioner

v.

JOSEPH T. MOLIERI, GAIL L. FAIRMAN, HUGH J. BURNS, JR., LAWRENCE S. KRASNER,JOSHUA D. SHAPIRO, AND
MAX BAER,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 194 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of February, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Digene Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Charles M. Fleischman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 that, to my knowledge:

1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



| | /s/ Charles M. FleischmanCharles M. Fleischman
Chief Financial Officer
September 30, 2002
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------