alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 3987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01091]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

United States Mint


Pricing for Liberty & Britannia Products

AGENCY: United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Mint is setting prices for the Liberty & 
Britannia Products.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
24YA.................  Liberty & Britannia 24K     Per grid.
                        High Relief Gold Proof
                        Coin.
24YB.................  Liberty & Britannia Silver  $89.00.
                        Proof Medal.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann Bailey, Sales and Marketing, 
United States Mint, 801 9th Street NW, Washington, DC 20220; or call 
202-354-7500.
    Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112, & 9701.

Eric Anderson,
Executive Secretary, United States Mint.
[FR Doc. 2024-01091 Filed 1-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-37-P
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew L. Graham, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Trimeris, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 30, 2009
|By:                  |  | /s/ Andrew L. Graham   
|                     |  | Andrew L. Graham       
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In
connection with the Annual Report of Trimol Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for
the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.

|               |                                                                  
|-------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|               | /s/ Yuri Benenson                                                
|               |                                                          
|               | Yuri Benenson
    Chief Executive Officer 
    TRIMOL GROUP, INC.
|               |                                                                  
|April 14, 2005 |                                                                  

|38
|--
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

203) IV-C-170 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:21:02 AM Sheet 203 of 232 
P.2 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENC 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

FEB 1 a 1991 

A-87-11 

tW-C-ITo 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND FIADIATION 

Mr. Scott York 

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 

400 Seventh Street, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. York: 

If " !". I. 

»JJG - I 1991 

/ *. i XJ' •> 

Glenn Passavant asked me to provide you with a package 

of documents per your request, to aid in your assessment of 

onboard refueling emissions control safety. I have enclosed 

the following: 

• The proposed rule for improved evaporative emissions 

control, dated January 19, 1990. 

• A workshop notice describing some proposed changes to 

the improved evaporative emissions control test 

procedure, dated December 3, 1990. 

• The proposed requirements for improved evaporative 

emissions controls being considered by the State of 

California, dated August 9, 1990. An updated version, 

containing only minor changes and additions, is expected 

to be finalized by the end of February. 

• An EPA memorandum describing the phenomena of running 

loss emissions, dated September 8, 1988. 

• Running Loss Test Program Preliminary Results, dated 

November, 1989. 

• SAE Technical Papers 900503 and 902115, which discuss 

reduction of exhaust emissions using heated catalytic 

converters. 
P.3 

V 

Please feel free to contact me at FTS 374-8588 if you 

have any questions or require any additional information. 

Sincerely, 

Dan Barba, Mechanical Engineer 

Standards Development and Support Branch 

Enclosures
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-09-00293-CR

WILLIAM YORK APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 4 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

A jury convicted Appellant William York of theft of property under $1,500 

after having been previously convicted of theft two or more times. See Tex. 

Penal Code Ann. § 31.03(e)(4)(D) (Vernon 2003). The jury assessed his 

punishment at one year and 364 days’ confinement, and the trial court sentenced 

him accordingly.

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

York’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as 

counsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel’s brief and motion meet 

the requirements of Anders v. California2by presenting a professional evaluation 

of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. This 

court afforded York the opportunity to file a brief on his own behalf, and he has 

filed one. The State has also filed a brief.

As the reviewing court, we must conduct an independent evaluation of the 

record to determine whether counsel is correct in determining that the appeal is 

frivolous. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); 

Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 923 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only 

then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, York’s pro se brief, 

and the State’s brief. We agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous 

and without merit; we find nothing in the record that arguably might support an 

appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s 

judgment.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

 

2

386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).
3

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 6, 2011
E
. BENJAMI N NELSO N NEBRASKA rMRv

T 

# pcT-osT

- aaf/

- 013 1 

# lanit dState s Senat

e 72 0 HAR TSENAT E OFFIC E BUILDIN G WASHINGTON , D C 2051 0 (202 ) 224-655 1 FAX:(202)228-001 2 www.bennelson.senate.go v

Novembe r

28,201 1

Mr
. Denni s J
. Devan y Chief , Essentia l Ai r

Servic e Division Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s Unite dState s Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D C 20590-000 1 Dea r Mr
. Devany : I amplease dt o hav e th e opportunity t o writ e t o yo u regardin g proposal s you r offic e ha s receive d for Essentia l Ai r

Servic e a t th e Siou x Gateway Airport
. I a mconfiden t

that you r offic e wil l carefull y conside r

th e opinion s that

local leader s hav e articulate dregardin g whic hcarrie r wil l provid e servic e at

Siou x Gateway Airport
. I understan dyo u hav e alread y receive dletter s fro mloca l leader s expressin g thei r preferenc e for ho w th e Essentia l Ai r

Servic e contrac t

shoul db e fulfilled
. I t

i s importan t

t o b e mindfu l o f

thei r preferenc e becaus e loca l official s ar e closes t t o citizen s the y serve . A s such , the y are i n th e bes t positio n t o judg e th e need s o f thei r community
. Federa l governmen t agencie s shoul db e sensitiv e whe n listenin g t o thes e need s an drespon daccordingl y t o ensur e tha t federal service s ar e meetin g th e need s o f

th e targete dpopulation
. Whe n thi s happens , th e interest s o f resident s i n th e geographi c are aserve db y th e Siou x Gateway Airport wil l b e allocate di n away that i s beneficial t o thos e usin g th e service. I feel tha t th e contrac t

proposa l provide s th e lon g termviability neede dt o bes t serv e th e communitie s o f

Siou x City , lA ; SouthSiou x City NE ; Nort hSiou x Cit y SD , Dakot aDunes S D an dth e surroundin g communitie s collectivel y referre dt o a s Siouxland
. Th e Essentia l Ai r

Servic e progra mi s importan t t o man y resident s an dbusinesse s i n Siouxland
. Thank yo u fo r you r tim e an dcarefu l consideratio n o f th e Essentia l Ai r

Servic e contrac t

for th e Siou x Gateway Airport
. Sincerely ,
E
. Benjami n Nelso n Unite dState s Senato r

44 0 NORT H 8T H STREE T SUIT E 12 0 LINCOLN , N E 6850 8 (402 ) 441-460 0 FAX : (402)476-875 3 FIEL D REPRESENTATIV E POS TOFFIC E BO X 210 5 KEARNEY , N E 6884 8 (308)293-581 8 FIEL D REPRESENTATIV E POS TOFFIC E BO X 147 2 ScOTTSBLUFF , N E 6936 3 (308)631-761 4 1181 9 MIRACL E HILL S DRIV E SUIT E 20 5 OMAHA , N E 6815 4 (402)391-341 1 FAX : (402 ) 391-472 5
Order entered December 10, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01453-CV

IN THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF B.J

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MED-18-80461

ORDER

This accelerated appeal from an order to administer psychoactive medication was filed 

November 26, 2018. The clerk’s record has been filed; the reporter’s record has not. 

Accordingly, we ORDER court reporter Charletta Breed to file the record no later than 

December 20, 2018. We further ORDER appellant’s brief filed within ten days of the filing of 

the reporter’s record and appellee’s brief filed within ten days of the filing of appellant’s brief.

Because of the nature of this appeal, we caution that extension requests will be disfavored.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Breed and the 

parties.

 

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-75870), Form S-8 (No. 333-05645) and on Form S-8
(No. 333-52955) of PetroCorp Incorporated of our report dated March 9, 2001,
relating to the audited financial statements, which appear in this Annual
Report of PetroCorp Incorporated on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2000.

                                          PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma

March 26, 2001
EXHIBIT
32





SECTION
1350


CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the Annual Report of True Product ID, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Wilson W. Hendricks
III and Michael J. Antonoplos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and








(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








Date:  October
14, 2008





By:   /s/
Michael J. Antonoplos


Michael J. Antonoplos


Secretary and Director and current
Chief


Accounting Officer





By:   /s/
Wilson W. Hendricks III


Wilson W. Hendricks III


Former Chief Executive Officer
and


Chief Accounting Officer (March –
October


2008)
# L_2006368EN.01S00301.xml

| 23.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 368/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 368/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

From 1 January 2007, the structure of the Official Journal will be modified in the direction of a clearer classification of the acts published which preserves, nevertheless, essential continuity.

The new structure, with examples illustrating its use in the classification of acts, can be consulted on the EUR-Lex site on the following address:

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm

---
Original

No. LD-97-008

#### Roberge’s Case

August 30, 1999

*Griffith & Associates, PLLC,*of Wilton *(John P. Griffith*on the brief and orally), for the committee on professional conduct.

*Shaines & McEachern, P.A.,*of Portsmouth *(Paul McEachern*on the brief and orally), for the respondent, Carolyn Roberge.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (committee) petitioned this court for a six-month suspension of the respondent, Carolyn Roberge. This court referred the matter to a Judicial Referee *(Temple,*J.). After a hearing, the referee recommended that the petition against the respondent be dismissed. The committee objects to the referee’s recommendation. We agree with the referee and dismiss the petition.

*139In professional conduct matters, although we defer to the referee’s factual findings if supported by the record, see *Wehringer’s Case,*130 N.H. 707, 716, 547 A.2d 252, 257 (1988), we retain the ultimate authority to determine whether, on the facts found, a violation of the rules governing attorney conduct has occurred and, if so, the appropriate sanction. *See Wood’s Case,*137 N.H. 698, 701, 634 A.2d 1340, 1342 (1993).

The record in this case supports the findings of the referee that the respondent was acting in an individual capacity rather than in a lawyer-client relationship and that she did not engage in any intentional misrepresentation which would subject an attorney to discipline when acting in a personal capacity. We uphold the referee’s determination that no violation of New Hampshire Rule of Professional Conduct (Rule) 3.4 occurred in this case.

The referee’s finding, by clear and convincing evidence, that the respondent, under the unique circumstances of this case, did not violate Rule 8.4(c) by recording a telephone conversation is also supported in the record. Therefore, we adopt the referee’s findings and dismiss the petition.

*Petition dismissed.*

THAYER, HORTON, and BRODERICK, JJ., did not sit; BATCHELDER, J., retired, participated by special assignment under RSA 490:3; all who participated concurred.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7114

WARREN MATTHEW GIDDINGS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE; MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND; FOX NEWS STAFF; ROCKVILLE MARYLAND , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Stephanie A. Gallagher , District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 01360

- SAG )

Submitted : January 20, 2022 Decided: January 25, 2022

Before WILKINSON , DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.
Warren Matthew Giddings, Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7114 Doc: 16 Filed: 01/25/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Warren Matthew Giddings seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to comply with the court’s prior order directing him to amend his complaint

. This court may exercise jurisdiction only

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541,
545

- 46 (1949). “[D]ismissals without prejudice generally are not appealable unl ess the grounds for dismissal clearly indicate that no amendment in the complaint could cure the defects in the plaintiff ’ s case.” Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC , 959 F.3d 605, 610 (4th Cir. 2020) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied , 141 S. Ct. 1376 (2021). Because the district court dismissed Giddings ’ complaint without prejudice and Giddings could possibly cure the pleading deficiencies identified by the court by filing an amended complaint, the court’s order is neither a final order nor an appeal able interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand to the district court with instructions to allow Giddings to amend the complaint

. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED

* In his informal brief and notice of appeal, Giddings claims that he never received the district court’s order directing him to amend his complaint. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7114 Doc: 16 Filed: 01/25/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Schedule to Exhibit 10.34
                              Suburban Lodges, Inc.

A security  agreement in favor of Finova Realty Capital Inc. with  substantially
the same terms as Exhibit 10.26 to the Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended  December 31, 1999 for the  following  group of properties is not
being separately filed:

 PROPERTY NAME                          ADDRESS                CITY, STATE

Group 6

Suburban Lodge - Hazlewood           9067 Dunn Road            Hazelwood, MO
Suburban Lodge - St. Charles         1769 Fairlane Dr.         St. Charles, MO
Suburban Lodge - East Indianapolis   2301 Post Dr.             Indianapolis, IN
Suburban Lodge - Newport News        12015 Jefferson Ave.      Newport News, VA
Suburban Lodge - Jackson, Miss.      5731 I-55 N               Jackson, MS
I am Jane Hovde from Haverford, PA and represent Delco Action Seniors 

Affiliated with the Pennsylvania Alliance for Retired Americans. As 

grandmothers and grandfathers we are profoundly concerned with the 

future welfare of our grandchildren and great grandchildren. We 

believe the vast majority of the world's scientists when they tell us that 

we are already experiencing serious consequences from climate change 

and that industrial carbon emissions affect the pace and scope of that 

change. Carbon pollution also produces an increase in respiratory and 

asthma-related conditions. 

We, therefore, support wholeheartedly the EPA's current proposals for 

limiting carbon emissions. They are both reasonable and long overdue. 

If implemented they will help greatly to ensure that our descendants 

and the world's descendants will live in a healthier and more stable 

world. 

Living as we do in Pennsylvania we are sensitive to those who worry 

about the economic impact of the proposed regulations. We believe, 

however, that new jobs in a growing environmental industry of 

conservation and alternative fuels will more than offset losses due to 

any of the EPA's regulations. 

In our view the EPA carbon emission proposals are critically important 

and should be implemented with all possible speed. 

Jane Hovde 

Haverford, PA 

janehovde@gmail.com