alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Qaurterly Report of Feel Golf
Co., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lee Miller, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78 m or 78o (d));
      and2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Feel Golf
      Co., Inc.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  FEEL GOLF
CO., INC.
 /s/ 
      Lee MillerLee
      Miller


Chief
      Executive Officer






Date: May 12,
2009
#### TIGER v. STATE.

No. A-11972.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

May 12, 1954.

*1110Walter Billingsley, Allen G. Nichols, Wewoka, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

JONES, Judge.

The defendant Lewis Tiger was charged by an information filed in the District Court of Seminole County with the crime of manslaughter in the first degree, it being alleged that he effected the death of his wife, Helen Tiger, while engaged in the commission of the misdemeanor of reckless driving; a jury was waived, the defendant was tried, found guilty of the lesser offense of manslaughter in the second degree, and sentenced to pay a fine of $250 and serve a term of six months imprisonment in the county jail, and has appealed.

The only issue presented on appeal is that the judgment and sentence was excessive. The proof of the state showed that one Franklin Reed was driving a truck filled with butane gas, and traveling west on State Highway No. 9. A pickup truck, driven by defendant, ran into the side of the truck carrying the butane with such force that Helen Tiger was- killed. The defendant was driving his truck up a county road and did not slow down or make any effort to avoid a collision with the truck being driven by Reed. The two highway patrolmen and the doctor who was called by the patrolmen to treat the accused for superficial injuries all testified that defendant was drunk. The defendant told the patrolmen that he had drunk “about six pints of beer.”

Pictures of both vehicles were admitted in evidence and they distinctly show that the pickup truck driven by the defendant ran squarely into the side of the butane gas truck.

The defendant, in his own behalf, stated ■that he had just drunk two bottles of beer. He admitted seeing the truck before he arrived at the intersection but claimed he was unable to stop the pickup he was driving, so he turned west down the highway “and the truck ran into me.” However, a few minutes before he had stated on direct examination, “I run into a truck.”

The proof of the state clearly showed that the defendant was guilty of reckless driving in violation of the provisions of the statute. 47 O.S.1951 § 121.3, Paragraphs (a) and (j).

The trial court would have been fully justified in finding the defendant guilty of manslaughter in the first degree, which would have carried a minimum punishment of four years in the penitentiary. He certainly has no cause to complain of the sentence which was meted out to him.

The judgment and sentence of the District Court of Seminole County is affirmed.

POWELL, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur..
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6476]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, this month I join more than 52 million 
Latinos in Nevada and across the country to celebrate Hispanic Heritage 
Month.
  Each year Hispanic Heritage Month is an opportunity to honor the 
contributions of a population that is so important to our national 
identity--a community that has contributed to our country's progress 
for centuries.
  We see those contributions in every facet of our society: on the 
battlefield and in the boardroom, in the courtroom and the classroom, 
at the art gallery and in the recording studio, and on the playing 
field. In Nevada Hispanic influence is evident in the name of our 
State--Nevada, snowcapped Las Vegas, and the meadows.
  Today, more than one-quarter of Nevada's population is Hispanic. 
Nationwide, Latinos are expected to make up 60 percent of the 
population growth in the coming decades. To ensure our country thrives, 
we need to make sure its Hispanic population thrives as well.
  That is why President Obama and Democrats in Congress have fought for 
the policies that are making the Hispanic community stronger and more 
prosperous. Despite opposition, we have made progress on economic and 
educational issues that are important to Latinos and to all Americans. 
The Recovery Act, which included tax cuts for working families and 
improvements in unemployment insurance, kept more than 2 million 
Hispanics out of poverty.
  Unlike Governor Romney, we know Americans who access the employment 
benefits they have earned while working are not ``victims'' who are 
unwilling to take ``personal responsibility'' for their lives. 
``Victims'' is Mitt Romney's word; ``personal responsibility'' are his 
words.
  Democrats secured tax credits for more than 8 million Hispanic 
children and their families. Mitt Romney, on the other hand, believes 
tax credits for working parents struggling to make ends meet are a hand 
out, not a hand up.
  Democrats fought to give small business loans to almost 9,000 
Hispanic-owned businesses. Under a Romney administration, loans for 
small businesses would be a thing of the past--one more remnant of the 
dependency culture he loathes.
  Mitt Romney was caught on tape telling wealthy donors he would be 
winning this election if he was Latino. That is what he said. But we 
know Mitt Romney's problem isn't that he is not Hispanic; his problem 
is that he opposes the commonsense policies that are good for Hispanic 
families.
  Republicans have been paying lipservice to concerned Hispanic 
families in the months leading up to election day. Democrats are 
helping Hispanic families tackle the challenges they face every day.
  To us, Hispanic Heritage Month isn't just about recognizing the 
incredible contributions Hispanic Americans make to our Nation; it is 
also about building a brighter future for Hispanic Americans in our 
Nation.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Purina Mills, LLC (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 27, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Daniel Knutson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                     By:  /s/ Daniel Knutson
                                        -------------------------------
                                            Daniel Knutson
                                            Senior Vice President
                                            and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, asamended (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Ricardo A. Salas                                    |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Ricardo A. Salas, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| March 16, 2006                                          |

 

----
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1453/2006

of 29 September 2006         

fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(a), (b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003, excluding malt, exported in the natural state, shall be as set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 October 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 September 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 29 September 2006 fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal

----
Kranem Corporation: Exhibit 10.2 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






EXTENSION OF ASSIGNMENT OF NOTE AGREEMENT

THIS Extension (the “Extension”) of Assignment of
Note Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”), which was
signed on or about April 21, 2011, is effective as of May 6, 2011 (the
“Effective Date”), by and between Xalted Holding Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), Kranem Corporation, a Colorado corporation
(the “Assignee”), Imprenord, ME (“Imprenord”), Empire Capital
Partners, L.P. (“Empire”) and Peter Richards (“Mr. Richards,”
together with Imprenord and Empire, the “Assignors” and individually an
“Assignor”). The Company, the Assignee and the Assignors are sometimes
hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Parties” and individually as
a “Party.” Words not defined herein shall have the same as set forth in
the Assignment 

WHEREAS, the Parties signed the Agreement on or about
April 21, 2011;

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to extend the effective date
of the Agreement from May 6, 2011 until the SEA is effective; 

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Parties agree to extend the Effective Date of the
Agreement from May 6, 2011 until the SEA is effective.

2. The Parties agree and acknowledge that all other provisions
of the Agreement shall remain in efftec.

3. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the
laws of the State of Delaware as applied to agreements among Delaware residents
entered into and to be performed entirely within Delaware.

4. The Parties agree to execute such further instruments and to
take such further action as may reasonably be necessary to carry out the intent
of this Agreement. 

5. This Agreement shall be binding upon the transferee,
successors, assigns and legal representatives of the Parties hereto.

6. This Agreement may be signed by facsimile and executed in
counterparts with the same force and effect as if each of the signatories had
executed the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed
this Agreement as the Effective Date.

	THE COMPANY: 	THE ASSIGNEE: 
	  	  
	By: /s/ Ajay Batheja	By: /s/ Ajay Batheja
	Name: Ajay Batheja	Name: Ajay
      Batheja
	Date Signed: ____________	Date Signed: ___________


1 of 2





	IMPRENORD: 	EMPIRE: 
	  	  
	Signature: /s/ Jeetendra Chauhan 	Signature: /s/ Peter J. Richards 
	Name: Jeetendra Chauhan 	Name: Peter J. Richards 
	Title: Treasurer 	Title: Managing Partner 
	Date Signed: July 18, 2011 	Date Signed: July 14, 2011 
	  	  
	MR. RICHARDS 	  
	  	  
	Signature: /s/ Peter J. Richards 	  
	Name: Peter J. Richards 	  
	Date Signed: July 14, 2011 	  


2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUZ ELENA CATALAN,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 70004

Agency No. A070

- 962

- 154

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 17, 2020 * *

Before: TROTT, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Luz Elena Catalan

, a native and citizen of Guatemala

, petitions for review of

the Board of Immi gration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her third motion to

reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 19 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 15

- 70004

discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Cano

- Merida v. INS , 311 F.3d 960,

964 (9th Cir. 2002). We deny the petiti on for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in concluding that Catalan failed to

establish a prima facie case for the relief she sought and that s he failed to establish

that she qualified for the exception to the filing deadline and numerical limit ation

for motions to reopen by introducing previously unavailable, material evidence. 8

U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(A), (C)(ii); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi v. Holder

,

597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010); see also Catalan v. Holder , 535 F. App’x 562

(9t h Cir. 2013) (denying Catalan’s previous petition for review). For example, as

the BIA noted, Catalan did not introduce evidence showing that her father’s death

in 2007 or the result of the 2011 Guatemalan presidential election would lead to

her facing persecution or torture , and the declaration she submitted in support of

her motion to reopen does not reflect any threats made against her personally in

2008

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 23.3Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consentto the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts”and to the use of our report dated January 10, 2007, withrespect to the combined financial statements of Sunset Healthcareincluded in Amendment No. 3 tothe Registration Statement (Form S-1) and related Prospectus of Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. forthe registration of its common stock.                                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP         Orange County, California
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, John Hiner, President and Chief Executive Officer of Geocom Resources Inc., and Paul Chung, Chief Financial Officer of Geocom Resources Inc., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Geocom Resources Inc. for the interim period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Geocom Resources Inc. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated:  December 21, 2005

/s/ John Hiner

John Hiner

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Paul Chung

Paul Chung

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 23.2Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” and to the useof our report dated August 8, 2007, with respect to the balance sheet ofPeplin, Inc. included in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (Form S-1 No. 333-145266)and related Prospectus of Peplin, Inc. expected to be filed on or about September 28, 2007./s/ Ernst & Young
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/01 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-56971, 333-81383, 333-73098, 333-85572, 333-109877 and333-109879) of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International of our report dated March 15, 2006, except forthe restatement described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements and the matterdescribed in the penultimate paragraph of Management’s Report on Internal Control Over FinancialReporting, as to which the date is January 22, 2007, relating to the consolidated financialstatements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingwhich appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31 , 2005. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Mark Miller, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10 — QSB of Full House Resorts, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer’s most recent quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Dated: August 10, 2007 By:  /s/  MARK MILLER    Mark Miller    Chief Financial Officer