alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MM2 Group, Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Mark
Meller, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.


                                        Date: February 20, 2007

                                        By /s/ Mark Meller
                                        --------------------------
                                        Mark Meller
                                        President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                            D&E Communications, Inc.

                           Subsidiaries of the Company
                             as of December 31, 2000
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following is a listing of all subsidiaries of the Registrant, the state of
incorporation of each, and the names under which subsidiaries do business.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          State of                     Doing Business
       Subsidiary                      Incorporation                   Under Name of
       ----------                      -------------                   -------------
<S>                                    <C>                      <C>
Denver and Ephrata Telephone
     and Telegraph Company             Pennsylvania             D&E Telephone Company

D&E Networks, Inc.                     Pennsylvania             D&E Networks, Inc.
                                                                D&E Telephone and Data
               .                                                       Systems, Inc.,
                                                                CompuSpirit, Inc.,
                                                                Alternate Solutions, Inc.
                                                                D&E Telestore,
                                                                D&E Computer Networking
                                                                       Services

D&E Wireless, Inc.                     Pennsylvania             D&E Wireless, Inc.

D&E Investments, Inc.                  Nevada                   D&E Investments, Inc.

PCS Licenses, Inc.                     Nevada                   PCS Licenses, Inc.

D&E Systems, Inc.                      Delaware                 D&E Systems, Inc.
                                                                D&E Communications
                                                                D&E Long Distance
</TABLE>
3DR Aero-M Specifications

Autopilot: 3DR Pixhawk V2.4.5

Firmware: ArduPlane 3.1.1

GPS: 3DR u-blox GPS with Compass (LEA-6H module, 5 Hz update)

Telemetry radio: 3DR Radio v2 (915 mHz or 433 mHz)

Motors: Tiger Motor AT2820-7 830 kV

Frame: Fixed wing

Propellers: Gemfan 11x7

Battery: 4S 6000 mAh 35C lithium polymer

Aircraft weight (with battery): 6.8 lbs (3 kg)

Aircraft dimensions: 74 in (188 cm) wingspan, 51 in (129 cm) length

Case dimensions: 60.75 in x 14.5 in x 15.5 in (154 cm x 37 cm x 39 cm)

Payload capacity: 1.1 lbs (500 g)

Radio range: .6 miles* (1 km)

Flight time: 40 min*

Maximum operational wind speed: 25 mph (11 m/s)

Landing accuracy: 6.5 ft latitude x 131 ft longitude (2 m x 40 m)

Recommended flight speed: 33 mph (15 m/s)

Camera: Canon SX260 12.1 megapixel

Camera software: 3DR EAI 1.0

Area coverage (single flight): 250 acres* (1 km2)

Orthomosaic accuracy: 3-16 ft (1-5 m)

Ground sampling distance: 2 inches per pixel* (5 cm per pixel)

Image processing software: Pix4Dmapper LT 3DR Edition (Windows only)

*Figures reflect estimated values at ideal operating conditions. Environmental conditions 

can affect flight time, range, area coverage, and ground sampling distance.

v3
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**The Board of Directors
### Scott Clark Special Assistant Office of Lieutenant Governor Mead Treadwell

240 Main Street , Room 301 Juneau , Alaska 99801 PHONE: 907.465.4081
EX-10.14






Prepared by:



Jody L. Spencer, Esq.


Rogers & Hardin LLP


2700 International Tower


229 Peachtree Street, N.E.


Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1601



After recording, please return to:



Fidelity National Title Insurance Company


990 Hammond Drive, Suite 550


Atlanta, Georgia 30328


Attn: Ms. Cheryl Clark



LIMITED WARRANTY DEED




THIS INDENTURE, made and entered into as of the 10th day of January, 2012, by and between
McGEE ROAD ASSOCIATES, L.P., a Georgia limited partnership, whose address is 20 Mansell Court East,
Suite 200, Roswell, Georgia 30076 (hereinafter referred to as “Grantor”), and G&E HC REIT II
SNELLVILLE SNF, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, whose address is c/o Grubb & Ellis
Healthcare REIT II, Inc., 1551 North Tustin Avenue, Suite 300, Santa Ana, California 92705, Attn:
Danny Prosky, President and COO (hereinafter referred to as “Grantee”) (the words “Grantor” and
“Grantee” to include their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns where
the context requires or permits);



W I T N E S S E T H, THAT:




GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good
and valuable consideration, in hand paid at and before the sealing and delivery of these presents,
the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold, aliened, conveyed and
confirmed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, convey and confirm unto said
Grantee, all that tract or parcel of land lying and being located in Gwinnett County, Georgia, and
being more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference (hereinafter referred to as the “Property”).



TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Property, with all and singular the rights, members and appurtenances
thereof, to the same being, belonging, or in anywise appertaining, only to the proper use, benefit
and behoof of the said Grantee forever in FEE SIMPLE, subject to those matters listed on
Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.



AND THE SAID GRANTOR will warrant and forever defend the right and title to the Property unto
Grantee against the claims of all persons and entities whomsoever claiming by, through or under
Grantor.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed and sealed this Limited Warranty Deed on the day and
year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	Signed, sealed and delivered in

the presence of:

	 	McGEE ROAD ASSOCIATES, L.P., a

Georgia limited partnership
	 	



	/s/ Philip M. Rees

	 	By:/s/ James J. Andrews
	 	[SEAL]
	 

	 	 
	 	 
	Unofficial Witness

	 	James J. Andrews, President
	 	

	/s/ Janet C. Guy

	 	

	 	

	 

	 	

	 	

	Notary Public

	 	

	 	

	My commission expires:

	 	

	 	

	4/1/14

	 	

	 	

	 

	 	

	 	







[NOTARIAL SEAL]



787484
EXHIBIT 5.1
  
 Re:
    
    Registration Statement on Form S-8for Offering of 500,000 Shares of Common Stock
       Very truly yours,/s/ Dorsey & Whitney LLPDORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
To: Brenda Robeson Program Analyst 1110 Butler Rd. Suite i Greenville, SC 29607 864.641.7780

Federal Aviation Administration From:

Brenda, Mike Henderson CEO SkyBridge Holdings LLC 111 0 W Butler Road Greenville, SC, 29607
The aircraft we propose to use for the operations described in our 

### 333 Exemption request (FAA-2015-2718 ) is as follows: Model: Weights:

Dimensions:

Avionics:
Source: Max Weight: OEW MaxPL Span Wing area Length Autopilot/Control System Ground Station Design Manufacturer



# :;;; **;v ~**  Mike Henderson 864 430 0722

www. SkyBridgeUAS.com contact @ skybridgeu as .com SkyBridge SB-1
55 lbs 24 lbs 25 lbs 

### 13.3 ft 18 sq 

### ft 

### 6.6 ft Piccolo II (mil-spec, DGPS enabled) Piccolo Full Featured SkyBridge Research (Henderson) UASUSA/SkyBridge
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000376 04-AUG-2016 08:08 AM
Final report 

Final Report 

Acute Inhalation Toxicity Study of 

MTDID 800 and in Rats 

Study Director: 

Study Toxicologist: 

Testiug Facility: 

Sponsor: 

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT 

This report contains the unpublished results of research sponsored by 3M. These results may not be 

published, either wholly or in part, or reviewed or quoted in any other publication without the prior 

authorization of 3M. 

Page I of 7
Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-3 (File No. 33-85896) and Form S-8 (File No. 33-78592 and No. 333-
69913), of D&E Communications, Inc. of our reports dated February 26, 1999, on
our audits of the consolidated financial statements of D&E Communications, Inc.
and the financial statements of D&E/Omnipoint Wireless Joint Venture, L.P.
included in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 24, 1999
II

Calendar No. 391

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1474

To provide new authority for probation and pretrial services officers, and

for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 13, 1995

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

MAY 2, 1996

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

A BILL

To provide new authority for probation and pretrial services

officers, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NEW AUTHORITY FOR PROBATION AND PRE4 TRIAL SERVICES OFFICERS.

5 (a) PROBATION OFFICERS.—Section 3603 of title 18,

6 United States Code, is amended—
2

S 1474 RS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph

2 (8)(B);

3 (2) by redesignating paragraph (9) as para4 graph (10); and

5 (3) by inserting after paragraph (8) the follow6 ing new paragraph:

7 ‘‘(9) if approved by the district court, be au8 thorized to carry firearms under such rules and reg9 ulations as the Director of the Administrative Office

10 of the United States Courts may prescribe; and’’.

11 (b) PRETRIAL SERVICES OFFICERS.—Section 3154

12 of title 18, United States Code, is amended—

13 (1) by redesignating paragraph (13) as para14 graph (14); and

15 (2) by inserting after paragraph (12) the fol16 lowing new paragraph:

17 ‘‘(13) As approved by the district court, carry

18 firearms under such rules and regulations as the Di19 rector of the Administrative Office of the United

20 States Courts may prescribe.’’.

Calendar No. 391

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1474

A BILL

To provide new authority for probation and pretrial

services officers, and for other purposes.

MAY 2, 1996

Reported without amendment
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5092 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5092

 To conduct or support further comprehensive research for the creation 
                   of a universal influenza vaccine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2018

 Ms. DeLauro introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To conduct or support further comprehensive research for the creation 
                   of a universal influenza vaccine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flu Vaccine Act''.

SEC. 2. RESEARCH FOR THE CREATION OF A UNIVERSAL INFLUENZA VACCINE.

    (a) In General.--The Director of the National Institute of Allergy 
and Infectious Diseases shall conduct or support comprehensive research 
for the creation of a universal influenza vaccine.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--To carry out this section, 
there are authorized to be appropriated $200,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2019 through 2023.
                                 <all>
```
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): February 19, 2008
 TRANS1 INC.
  Delaware
    
    001-33744
    
    33-0909022(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identificationincorporation)
    
    
    
    No.)
 411 Landmark Drive

Wilmington, NC 28412-6303
 (910) 332-1700
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425).
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 7.01 Regulation FD DisclosureSignatures    Table of Contents  
 Item 7.01
    
    Regulation FD Disclosure.




---



##### Table of Contents



Signatures
  TRANS1 INC.February 20, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Michael LuetkemeyerMichael LuetkemeyerChief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7710

ROBERT EARL MARTIN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,

Chief District Judge. (5:13-hc-02244-D)

Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Earl Martin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Earl Martin, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 

(2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Martin v. United States, No. 5:13-hc-02244-

D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

                  Certification Pursuant to
                   18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                   as Adopted Pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


          In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Myoffiz, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Chang, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant
to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



                              By   /s/  Michael Chang
                              ---------------------------
                              Michael Chang
                              Chief Financial Officer

January 14, 2004
#### Robert E. DUNNAM, Plaintiff In Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant In Error.

No. A-12146.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

April 13, 1955.

Appeal from the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Tulsa; Max F. Feld-ner, Judge.

The plaintiff in error, Robert E. Dunnam, defendant below, was convicted for the offense of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, on a public highway in the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma; punishment fixed at $150 fine, and he appeals. Affirmed.

John Cochran, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen.,' Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

BRETT, Judge.

Robert E. Dunnam was charged, by information; in the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Tulsa, State of Oklahoma, with the offense of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, on a public highway in the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, to wit: in the 1500 block on East Fourth Street, fin said City, County, and State. He was tried, convicted, and his punishment fixed at $150, which fine, judgment, and sentence was entered accordingly, from which this appeal has been perfected.

No brief has been filed in this case, and no appearance made at the time said cause was set for hearing of oral argument, on April 6, 1955, at which time no briefs had been filed, and no appearance was made, and said cause was submitted upon the record. Where the defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, and where no brief is filed, no appearance is made for oral argument, this court will examine the record, including the information, evidence, instructions, judgment, and sentence, and if no error prejudicial to the rights of the defendant is apparent, will affirm the' judgment; Smith v. State, *7.0*Okl.Cr. 81, 104 P.2d 1009; Walker v. State, 60 Okl.Cr. 302, 64 P.2d 935; Owens v. State, 60 Okl. *779Cr. 324, 64 P.2d 1234; Whitlow v. State, 85 Okl.Cr. 2, 184 P.2d 253. It has been repeatedly held this court will examine the record for jurisdictional error only, and where no such fundamental error appears, the judgment will be affirmed.

We have carefully examined the record herein, find that the information and evidence is sufficient to support the conviction, and the judgment and sentence are regular, and that no prejudicial error appears in the record herein presented. He being tried by the court without a jury, no instructions are involved.

The judgment and sentence herein imposed is therefore accordingly affirmed.

JONES, P. J., and POWELL, J., concur.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,614

EX PARTE EARL THOMPSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1091097 IN THE 263rd DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of stalking and

sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.

Thompson v. State, No. 14-08-00481-CR (Tex. Crim. App.–Houston [14 Dist.], delivered May 19, th

2009). 

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to advise him of his right to file petition for discretionary review pro se.
2

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court

has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to advise him of his

right to petition for discretionary review pro se. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. 

Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is

entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of

the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-08-00481-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case

No. 1091097 from the 263rd Judicial District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall file his

petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s

mandate issues.

Delivered: August 24, 2011

Do not publish
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 1st Constitution Bancorp (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the
Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge: (1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ ROBERT F. MANGANO      /s/ JOSEPH M. REARDON
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC, S/B/M/T

CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE

CORPORATION,

Respondent

v.

LUNDES GARRETT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 77 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of July, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.