alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, William M. Scharninghausen, Chief Financial Officer of Vialta, Inc., certifythat:
1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vialta, Inc. (the“registrant”);
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
          (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
          (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
          (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
          (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: November 13, 2003 /s/ William M. Scharninghausen    William M. Scharninghausen  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.2

Form of Series A Preferred Stock Certificate


              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                              CHINA AUTOPARTS, INC.
                      AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE 26,060,607 SHARES

20,000,000 COMMON SHARES            6,060,607 SERIES A PREFERRED SHARES
PAR VALUE $.0001 EACH               PAR VALUE $.0001 EACH


This certifies that  ________________ is the owner of _______________ fully paid
and  non-assessable  shares of the Series A Preferred Shares of CHINA AUTOPARTS,
INC.  transferable  only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in
person  or by duly  authorized  Attorney  upon  surrender  of  this  Certificate
properly endorsed.

In Witness  Whereof,  the said  Corporation  has caused this  Certificate  to be
signed by its duly  authorized  officers  and to be sealed  with the Seal of the
Corporation

                                  this _________ day of _________ A.D.______

Secretary - Treasure                                    President
May 24, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

PRESBYTERY OF NEW COVENANT, INC., Appellant

NO. 14-15-00178-CV V.

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF HOUSTON, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard the parties’ joint motion to vacate the judgment 

signed by the court below on February 20, 2015. Having considered the motion 

and found it meritorious, we order the judgment VACATED AND REMAND the 

cause to the trial court for proceedings in accordance with this Court's opinion. 

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Unassociated Document


 





		
355 Madison Ave


Morristown, NJ 07960


P: (973) 538-1194


F: (973) 538-1196


 


www.boomerangsystems.com


We Make Real Estate TM









 


 


 


 









September 21, 2011

















Dear Investor:

















You hereby loan to the Company $200,000.  You agree that upon the finalization of the documents related to the private placement by the Company of convertible notes and warrants that you will convert the loan into an equivalent amount of convertible note and warrants being issued in such private placement as if you had invested the amount of loan in the private placement.  Please acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing.


 


 




	Sincerely,	 	 	Agreed and Accepted:	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
/s/Joseph R. Bellantoni 

	 	 	
/s/ John Steinbach

	 
	
Joseph R. Bellantoni 

	 	 	
John Steinbach

	 
	
CFO, Boomerang Systems, Inc 

	 	 	
Pres., Atlantic & Madison of NJ Corp
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **1 -**  **7253**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DONALD WARDRICK , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Peter J. Messitte , Senior District Judge. ( 1:9 5

- cr - 00 294

- PJM

- 1; 8:99

- cv - 3381

- PJM )

Submitted : May 31, 2012 Decided: June 5, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Donald Wardrick , Appellant Pro Se. David Ira Salem , Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Donald Wardrick seeks to appeal the distri ct court’s order treating his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct a clerical error as a successive 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2011 ) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certi ficate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2006)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wardrick has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument b ecause the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Larry E. Buffington                                  |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Larry Buffington,  President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 19, 2009                                     |

 

----
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies(the “Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Tony  Chung                 |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Tony Chung, Vice President of Finance |   |
| December 17, 2004                     |   |

 

1

----
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |                                  |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|  /s/ ROBERT F. MANGANO  |                                  |
|  Name:                  | Robert F. Mangano                     |   |
|  Title:                      | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|  Date:                       | November  15, 2010          |   |
|                              |                                  |

|                        |                                |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| /s/ JOSEPH M. REARDON  |                                |
|  Name:            | Joseph M. Reardon                   |   |
|  Title:                | Senior Vice President and Treasurer |   |
| Date:                       | November  15, 2010        |   |

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1  Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Willem M. SmitWillem M. SmitChief Executive OfficerPresident and Director
IB 

Union Calendar No. 532 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5044 

[Report No. 115–689] 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the treatment of certain 

surviving spouses under the contracting goals and preferences of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2018 

Mr. CHABOT (for himself and Mr. BERGMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

MAY 18, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5044 RH

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the treatment of certain surviving spouses under the contracting 

goals and preferences of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5044 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Service-Disabled Vet5 erans Small Business Continuation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT REGARDING TREATMENT 

7 OF CERTAIN SURVIVING SPOUSES UNDER 

8 CONTRACTING GOALS AND PREFERENCES OF 

9 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

10 Effective on the date specified in subsection (e) of 

11 section 1832 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

12 for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 

13 2660), section 8127(k)(3) of title 38, United States Code, 

14 as amended by such section 1832, is further amended by 

15 inserting after the period at the end the following new sen16 tence: ‘‘A surviving spouse of such a veteran who is not 

17 covered by subparagraph (C)(i) of such section by reason 

18 of the disability rating of the veteran being less than 100 

19 percent shall be treated as being so covered during the 

20 period beginning on the date of the death of the veteran 

21 and ending on the date that is three years after such 

22 death, the date on which the surviving spouse remarries, 

23 or the date on which the surviving spouse relinquishes an 

24 ownership interest in the small business concern, which25 ever occurs first.’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 532 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5044 

[Report No. 115–689] 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify 

partment of Veterans Affairs. the contracting goals and preferences of the Dethe treatment of certain surviving spouses under 

MAY 18, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
#### ROBERT L. CLINE, ET ALS., COMPLAINANTS-APPELLANTS, v. BENJAMIN KURZWEIL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Argued February 7, 1949

Decided February 21, 1949.

*Mr. George H. Rosenstein*argued the cause for the complainants-appellants.

*Mr. Julius B. Cohen*argued the cause for the defendant-respondent.

Per Curiam.

The decree will be -affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice Chancellor Jayne in the former Court of Chancery.

*For affirmance:*Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Heher, Wacheneeld, Burling, and Ackerson—6.

*For reversal:*None.
32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund IV, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kimberly A. Springsteen-Abbott, Chief Executive Officer of the general partner
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Kimberly A. Springsteen-AbbottKimberly A. Springsteen-AbbottChief Executive OfficerAugust 13, 2009
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark A. Herpich,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Mark A. Herpich     |
|-------------------------|
| Mark A. Herpich         |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| August 3, 2006          |

 

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

### **CERTIFICATION**

### ** **

I, John Kang, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c) presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a) all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether ornot there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factorsthat could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of ourmost recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard tosignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Date: August 30,  2005 | /s/ John Kang                                    |   |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        | John Kang                                        |
|                        | Chairman, President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|                        | (Principal Executive  Officer)                   |

 

----
#### Application of Hubert BALES, for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

No. A-12270.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Feb. 21, 1956.

Hubert Bales, pro se.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

*592POWELL, Judge.

Petitioner alleges that he is confined in the State Penitentiary at McAlester by reason of a judgment entered in the district court of Tulsa County on January 5, 1955, wherein he was tried before the court without a jury and sentenced to serve a term of ten years imprisonment for the alleged crime of second degree burglary, second offense.

Petitioner seeks his release by way of a writ of habeas corpus based on two propositions:

(1) That he was deprived of his right to appeal by reason of the failure of his counsel to perfect his appeal after he had been paid money to obtain a record of the proceedings, and after counsel had agreed to perfect an appeal.

(2) That his conviction was in violation of Art. II, § 7, Const.Okla., O.S.1951, in that the evidence on which his conviction was based was obtained by an illegal search.

As we have so often pointed out, the function of the Criminal Court of Appeals in a habeas corpus proceeding is not to determine the guilt or innocence of petitioner of crime for which he was sentenced, but .only to determine whether he is restrained of his liberty by due process of law, and whether the court which rendered judgment imposing sentence was without jurisdiction. Winchester v. Waters, 97 Okl.Cr. 337, 263 P.2d 535. Also that the burden of establishing the allegations of the petition in habeas corpus is on the petitioner, and that habeas corpus can not be substituted for an appeal. Ex parte Giles, 97 Okl.Cr. 292, 262 P.2d 909.

Defendant was represented at trial by an attorney of his own choosing, one with long experience in the trial and appeal of criminal cases. And while no proof has been presented of negligent or improper representation, if such should be the fact, still such would not be a ground for a reversal of the conviction of the petitioner. If such were the rule, there would be no end of claims by persons convicted of crime.

Where an attorney, if such should be a fact, takes money from a client and does not use it for the purpose agreed, the client has a remedy against his attorney, but not in the manner herein sought.

The writ must be and is denied.

JONES, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 7, 2008
    /s/ Heath B. ClarkeHeath B. ClarkeChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Douglas S. NormanDouglas S. NormanChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DEVONTE ALLEN

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 0846

[ December 28, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County; Hon. Scott Suskauer, Judge; L.T. Case No.

502021CF005727A.

Devonte Allen, Pahokee, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L

. Melear,

Senior Assistant Attorney General , W est Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ERBER

, L EVINE and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.