alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

The following certification accompanies the issuer’squarterly report on Form 10-QSB and is not filed, as provided in Release 33-8212.  34-47551 dated May 13,2003.

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPALEXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying quarterly reporton Form 10-QSB of Coast Bancorp for the quarter ended June 30, 2005,I, Jack C. Wauchope, Chief Executive Officer of Coast Bancorp, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  that:

 

(1)                                  such quarterly report on Form 10-QSB ofCoast Bancorp for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in such quarterlyreport on Form 10-QSB of Coast Bancorp for the quarter ended June 30,2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Coast Bancorp.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Coast Bancorp and will be retained byCoast Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

 

Dated:  August 12,2005

 

 
|   | /s/ Jack C. Wauchope          |   |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   | Jack C. Wauchope              |
|   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6278]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. MARKEY:
       H.R. 6531.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article 1, Section 8
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
25, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-25-1999
<CASH>                                              72
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   114208
<ALLOWANCES>                                      4105
<INVENTORY>                                     120705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                241208
<PP&E>                                           87370
<DEPRECIATION>                                   36771
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  334009
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            78685
<BONDS>                                         100000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    334009
<SALES>                                        1084633
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1084633
<CGS>                                           830990
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   830990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                215286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1724
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               23302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  13331
<INCOME-TAX>                                      5743
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               7588
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      7588
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.91


</TABLE>
Does the Ingredient Material Satisfy the Legitimacy Criteria?

Has the Ingredient 

Material Been 

Discarded in the 

First Instance (i.e. 

disposed, 

abandoned, thrown 

away)?

Is the 

ingredient 

material 

managed as 

a valuable 

commodity

?

Does the 

ingredient 

material provide a 

useful 

contribution to 

the production or 

manufacturing 

process?

Does use of the 

ingredient material 

result in products that 

do not contain 

contaminants 

significantly higher in 

concentration than 

found in products that 

are manufactured with 

traditional ingredients?

Ingredient 

Material is 

a Waste

Ingredient 

Material is 

Not a 

Waste

YES

NO

NO TO ONE YES TO ALL

Has the Material 

Been Sufficiently 

Processed?

NO

YES

Flow Chart for Determining Whether Non-Hazardous Secondary 

Materials Used as Ingredients In Combustion Units are Solid 

Wastes

Ingredient 

Material is a 

Waste

Is the 

ingredient 

material 

used to 

produce a 

valuable 

product or 

intermediate

?
PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 92-5246

MADELYN TORRES,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.

Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge.

(CR-91-30-G)

Argued: January 30, 1996

Decided: March 4, 1996

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL,

MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, WILKINS, NIEMEYER, HAMILTON,

LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and

PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by published per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

ARGUED: John Randolph Riley, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney,

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Robert H.

Edmunds, Jr., United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed by an evenly-divided

vote of the en banc court.

AFFIRMED

 2
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of NEXHORIZON COMMUNICATIONS,  INC. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Daniel M. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 18, 2008



By:       /s/ Daniel M. Smith
         -----------------------------
         Daniel M. Smith
         Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with this Annual Report of UnionBanCal Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David I. Matson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Date:
March 6, 2009

By:

/s/ DAVID I. MATSON David I. Matson Chief Financial Officer


---
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             776
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,825
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     78,683
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               158,866
<PP&E>                                          29,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 226,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,406
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           146
<OTHER-SE>                                     171,402
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   226,164
<SALES>                                        208,304
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               237,292
<CGS>                                          106,778
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  202,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                22,981
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (665)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,072
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,805
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,267
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,267
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.33
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. Nat HENDERSON, County Attorney of Haskell County, Oklahoma, Plaintiff in Error, v. The MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK OF FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS, Defendant in Error.

No. 36199.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Nov. 16, 1954.

Cody Bain, County Atty., Stigler, for plaintiff in error.

Alpheus Vamer, Poteau, for defendant in error.

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

This action was commenced by the State of Oklahoma, ex rel., Nat Henderson, County Attorney of Haskell County, Oklahoma, to recover taxes and penalty against defendant Merchants National Bank of Fort Smith, Arkansas. The final order of the trial court was entered May 21, 1953, when the trial court overruled the motion for new trial.

The appeal was filed in this Court September 22, 1953. A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason the case was not filed within three months from the order overruling the motion for new trial and there was no order of the trial court entered extending the time for appeal. The motion to dismiss must be sustained. In Roof v. Fechtel, Okl., 258 P.2d 890, we said:

> “Where the petition in *error*with record or case made is not filed within three months after the judgment or final order made in the case and *773there has been no order of the trial court extending the time for appeal as provided by 12 O.S.1951 § 972, the appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.”

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification by Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   /s/ William D. HumesName:
    
    William D. HumesTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ WILLIAM A. PRIDDY, JR.William A. Priddy, Jr.Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Vice President
of Administration and SecretaryMay 27, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0001011451
<NAME> MECHANICAL DYNAMICS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          20,570
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,019
<ALLOWANCES>                                       175
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,663
<PP&E>                                           3,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,460
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              167
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,583
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,812
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,383
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,039
<INCOME-TAX>                                       968
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,071
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,071
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
        

</TABLE>
# UAS Flight Permission Form

In signing this form, I am giving Northeast Iowa Community College permission to operate

their UAS at less than 500 feet from property in which I am responsible for or affiliated with, for

the purpose of collecting aerial imagery and video.

Name:

Title:

Basis of Authority to Grant Permission:

Location:

Date of Operation:

Signature ___

_______________________________________________

Date __________________________

NICC Representative Receiving Permission

_______________________________________________________________
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 99-40322

Summary Calendar

__________________

RAYMOND PETER GODAIRE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ADJETEY LOMO,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(G-96-CV-475)

_________________________________________________________________

December 15, 1999

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Raymond Peter Godaire, (TDCJ # 613522), appeals the district

court’s dismissal, as frivolous, of his civil rights complaint. He

contends that the court erred by dismissing his complaint on the

basis that it would not ultimately be successful. 

We review the dismissal of an action as frivolous for abuse of

discretion. Booker v. Koonce, 2 F.3d 114, 115 (5th Cir. 1993). It

is inappropriate to dismiss a claim because its realistic chance of

ultimate success is slight; on the other hand, dismissal because

the claim has no realistic chance of success is proper. Id. at 114,

115-16 & n.9. Although he maintains that the record was not
- 2 -

sufficiently developed to permit dismissing the complaint as

frivolous, Godaire was allowed to develop his claims by providing

specific responses to the magistrate judge’s questionnaire. See

Eason v. Thaler, 14 F.3d 8, 9-10 (5th Cir. 1994). 

For his claim to be successful, Godaire was required to

establish that Dr. Lomo was either personally involved in the

constitutional deprivation or that Dr. Lomo’s acts were causally

connected to the deprivation alleged. See Woods v. Edwards, 51

F.3d 577, 583 (5th Cir. 1995). Godaire failed to make such a

showing. Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its

discretion.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Barry White, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of LIVE GLOBAL BID,
INC.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during  the  period in which  this  quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our  conclusions   about  the
          effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 23, 2004
/s/ Barry White
------------------------
By: Barry White, CEO
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1474

To provide new authority for probation and pretrial services officers, and

for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 13, 1995

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide new authority for probation and pretrial services

officers, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NEW AUTHORITY FOR PROBATION AND PRE4 TRIAL SERVICES OFFICERS.

5 (a) PROBATION OFFICERS.—Section 3603 of title 18,

6 United States Code, is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph

8 (8)(B);

9 (2) by redesignating paragraph (9) as para10 graph (10); and
2

•S 1474 IS

1 (3) by inserting after paragraph (8) the follow2 ing new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(9) if approved by the district court, be au4 thorized to carry firearms under such rules and reg5 ulations as the Director of the Administrative Office

6 of the United States Courts may prescribe; and’’.

7 (b) PRETRIAL SERVICES OFFICERS.—Section 3154

8 of title 18, United States Code, is amended—

9 (1) by redesignating paragraph (13) as para10 graph (14); and

11 (2) by inserting after paragraph (12) the fol12 lowing new paragraph:

13 ‘‘(13) As approved by the district court, carry

14 firearms under such rules and regulations as the Di15 rector of the Administrative Office of the United

16 States Courts may prescribe.’’.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 10.2

FIRST AMENDMENT
TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED REGULATIONS
OF
RADIO AUSTIN MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.

The undersigned members of Radio Austin Management, L.L.C. (hereinafter
referred to as the Company) hereby amend the Amended and Restated Regulations
of the Company (the Regulations) as follows:

Section 1. The exact text of Article VI, Section 6.1 of the Regulations
now reads as follows:

Dissolution. The Company shall be dissolved upon the occurrence of any of
the following:

(a) The unanimous consent in writing of the Members.

(b) The winding up and liquidation of the Company.

(c) The sale of all of the outstanding membership interests of the
Company, unless within ninety (90) days after such event the purchasers owning
a majority-in-interest (within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Section
301.7701-2(b)) give their written consent to continue the business of the
Company on the same terms and conditions provided in these Regulations by
forming a new limited liability company on terms identical to those set forth
in these Regulations.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, no Member shall
voluntarily withdraw from the Company, except following a transfer of such
Members entire interest in the Company in accordance with Section 7.1.

Section 2. In all other respects, the Regulations shall remain in full
force and effect.

This First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Regulations is effective
as of August 31, 2003.

EMMIS OPERATING COMPANYBy:Printed:Its:SINCLAIR TELECABLE, INCBy:Printed:Its: