alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5078 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5078

 To amend the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 to modify 
 requirements related to mortgage disclosures, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 2018

   Mr. Hill introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 to modify 
 requirements related to mortgage disclosures, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TRID Improvement Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO MORTGAGE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 4(a) of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 
(12 U.S.C. 2603(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``itemize all charges'' and inserting 
        ``itemize all actual charges'';
            (2) by striking ``and all charges imposed upon the seller 
        in connection with the settlement and'' and inserting ``and the 
        seller in connection with the settlement. Such forms''; and
            (3) by inserting after ``or both.'' the following new 
        sentence: ``Charges for any title insurance premium disclosed 
        on such forms shall be equal to the amount charged for each 
        individual title insurance policy, subject to any discounts as 
        required by State regulation or the title company rate 
        filings.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 5.1FORM OFOPINION OF ZUKERMAN GORE & BRANDEIS, LLPSeptember ___, 2007Grubb & Ellis Company
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 87/2006

of 7 July 2006         

amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 23a (Council Directive 92/121/EEC, deleted) of Annex IX to the Agreement:

Article 2

The text of Directive 2005/60/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 July 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*2).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 July 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES            

----

(1)OJ L 245, 7.9.2006, p. 7.

(2)OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p. 15.

(*2)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

----

Joint Declaration by the Contracting Parties

to Decision No 87/2006 incorporating Directive 2005/60/EC into the EEA Agreement

With regard to Directive 2005/60/EC, the Contracting Parties recall that references to legal acts concerning police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters are without prejudice to the understanding that police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (Title VI EU Treaty) fall outside the scope of the EEA Agreement.

Furthermore, with regard to the incorporation of 2005/60/EC into the EEA Agreement, the Contracting Parties recall, and take into account, the Declaration by the Commission, the Joint Declaration by the EEA EFTA States as well as the Joint Declaration by the Contracting Parties as added to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 98/2003 of 11 August 2003.

----
EXHIBIT 31.1
 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
              /s/ Donald M. EarhartDonald M. EarhartChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
## NUMBER 13

- 2 2

- 00 266

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

— 

## EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

EX PARTE DELFINO MOLINA AYALA JR.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 105 th District Court of KIeberg County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

Appellant, Delfino Molina Ayala Jr.

, filed a post

- conviction application for writ of

habeas corpus at the district court, pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal

Procedure. On May 17, 2022 , the trial court issued findings of fact and conclusions of law

and denied the applicati on for writ of habeas corpus. Appellant now seeks to appeal the
order denying habeas corpus relief.

Jurisdiction to grant post

- conviction habeas corpus relief in felony cases rests
exclusively with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. T ex . C ode C rim . P roc

. A nn . art.
11.07, § 5 ; Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth2

Dist. , 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); In re McAfee , 53 S.W.3d 715, 717

– 18 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, w e are without
jurisdiction to grant the requested relief.

The refore, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Furthermore,
appellant’s pending motion requesting an extension to respond to the Court’s defect

notice, is dismissed as moot.

JAIME TIJERINA Justice

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed on the 18th day of August , 202 2

.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 23, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41326 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE ROSENDO GARZA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-2401-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Rosendo Garza appeals his sentence following his guiltyplea conviction for possession with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of methamphetamine. He argues that the district court erred in denying him a minor-role adjustment to his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). Garza asserts that he was a minor participant because he was a courier and had limited knowledge of the conspiracy and drugs transported.2

As Garza did not preserve this issue in the district court, we review for plain error. See United States v. Washington, 480 F.3d 309, 313 (5th Cir. 2007). Pursuant to § 3B1.2 (b), a district court may decrease a defendant’s offense level by two levels if the defendant was a minor participant. An adjustment for a minor role applies to a defendant “who is less culpable that most other participants, but whose role could not be described as minimal.” § 3B1.2, comment. (n.5). The district court did not plainly err in denying Garza a minor-role adjustment. Accordingly, Garza’s sentence is affirmed. Although Garza’s sentence is affirmed, there is a clerical

error in the record. The indictment and plea agreement charged Garza with possession with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of methamphetamine, whereas the judgment reflected that Garza was convicted of possession with intent to distribute more than 50 kilograms of methamphetamine. Accordingly, this matter is remanded to the district court for correction of the clerical error in the judgment pursuant to FED . R. CRIM. P. 36. AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF CLERICAL ERROR IN JUDGMENT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          97,452
<SECURITIES>                                     5,514
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,144
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,439
<PP&E>                                          50,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 280,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,433
<BONDS>                                        127,380
<COMMON>                                             6
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   280,658
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               386,480
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  200,459
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,211
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,527
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                141,283
<INCOME-TAX>                                    51,634
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    537
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    89,112
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    24.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    24.18
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1** **Certification    pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,** **As    adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act    of 2002**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the    undersigned officers of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International    hereby certifies, to the best of such officer’s knowledge,    that:     1. The Registrant’s quarterly report on    Form 10-Q/A    for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the    “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934, as amended, and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of Registrant as of and for the periods presented in    the Report.       /s/  Timothy    C. Tyson    Timothy C. Tyson    President and Chief Executive Officer     Date: January 30, 2007       /s/  Bary    G. Bailey    Bary G. Bailey    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     Date: January 30, 2007     A signed original of this written statement required by    Section 906 has been provided to Valeant Pharmaceuticals    International and will be furnished to the Securities and    Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARQUISE ANTION STANLEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 612 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 10.9


 


SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE BONUS PLAN


 


EFFECTIVE MARCH 1, 2016


 


	INCENTIVE PLAN	COMPONENTS
	Plan Objectives	
        ·     Reward
        performance.

        ·     Encourage
        teamwork.

        ·     Focus
        employees on success factors.

	Participants	
        ·     Employees
        with employment date on or before January 1 and employed on December 31 of the plan year.

        ·     Agents
        at Associate, Partner or Senior Partner level.

        ·     Employees
        on probation status are excluded.

	Performance Period	·     Results from January 1 – December 31.
	Payout Frequency	·     Annually – on or prior to April 15.
	Performance Tracking	·     Monthly report furnished to employees, agents, and board of directors.
	Establishment of Goals	·     Recommendation by senior staff to compensation committee.
	Verification of Goals	·     Reports provided to Board along with financial statement.





	Payout
    Calculation	 Nodak Mutual Group must
increase surplus by the stated amount or no bonus paid.



	 	 
	 	·     Total
    of three goals:	 	Threshold	 	 	Target	 	 	Stretch	 
	 	1.  Combined Ratio	 	 	1.5	%	 	 	3	%	 	 	6	% 
	 	2.  Inforce Policy Growth	 	 	1.0	%	 	 	2	%	 	 	4	%
	 	3.  Return on Equity	 	 	.5	%	 	 	1	%	 	 	2	%






	 	
          

        ·     Target,
        Threshold, and Stretch goals established annually and approved by compensation committee.

         

        ·     Agents

         

        o     Eligibility
        and details are contained in the Agent Recognition Program.

         

        ·     Eligible
        Employees

         

        o     Employees,
        hired on or before January 1, are eligible to receive stated amount for each goal achieved multiplied by their earned salary
        for the calendar year (does not include bonuses or any other compensation).

         

        o     Employees
        hired after January 1 and prior to July 1 of the plan year are eligible to receive 50% of bonus achieved multiplied by
        the earned salary for the calendar year (does not include bonuses or any other compensation).

         

        o     Employees
        hired after July 1 are not eligible until the following year.

         

	Other	·     Board retains discretion on payment of Plan.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,2009, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Larry E. Buffington                             |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Larry Buffington, President and Chief Executive  Officer |   |
| November 23, 2009                                   |   |

 

----
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the use of our report dated May 11, 2001 with respect to the
Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended January 31, 2001
included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) of Frisco Bay Industries Ltd. for the
year ended January 31, 2003.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) pertaining to the Frisco Bay Industries Ltd. Stock Incentive Plan of Frisco
Bay Industries Ltd. of our report dated May 11, 2001 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Frisco Bay Industries Ltd. for
the year ended January 31, 2001 included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for
the year ended January 31, 2003.


                                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Chartered Accountants

Montreal, Canada
June 23, 2003
---

---

EXHIBIT 12.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Elbit Vision Systems Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Yaron Menashe, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|July 15, 2007 |  | /s/ Yaron Menashe
Yaron MenasheChief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
|------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



---

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7755

JOHN A. HAYNES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-2696-3-6BC)

Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 5, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John A. Haynes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Haynes v. South Carolina, No. CA-96-2696-3-6BC (D.S.C.

Nov. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 506 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an additional tool to prevent certain frauds against veterans, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 506 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Crimes 

3 Against Veterans Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL TOOL TO PREVENT CERTAIN FRAUDS 

5 AGAINST VETERANS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 63 of title 18, United 

7 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘§ 1352. Fraud regarding veterans’ benefits 

10 ‘‘(a) Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to exe11 cute, any scheme or artifice to defraud an individual of 

12 veterans’ benefits, or in connection with obtaining vet13 eran’s benefits for that individual, shall be fined under this 

14 title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both. 

15 ‘‘(b) In this section— 

16 ‘‘(1) the term ‘veteran’ has the meaning given 

17 that term in section 101 of title 38; and 

18 ‘‘(2) the term ‘veterans’ benefits’ means any 

19 benefit provided by Federal law for a veteran or a 

20 dependent or survivor of a veteran.’’. 

21 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

22 at the beginning of chapter 63 of title 18, United States 
3 

•HR 506 EH

1 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

2 item: 

‘‘1352. Fraud regarding veterans’ benefits.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 506 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide 

against veterans, and for other purposes. an additional tool to prevent certain frauds
---

---

EXHIBIT 12.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Elbit Vision Systems Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Yaky Yanay, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|June 29, 2006 |  | /S/ YAKY YANAY
Yaky YanayChief Financial Officer
|------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



---

---