CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM – Page 1 

(Electronic Format) 

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District

Rule No(s): 1151 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: June 19, 2012

Rule Title(s): Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations

Date Submitted to ARB: July 10, 2012

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): July 20, 1999

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No (If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Sheri Haggard Phone Number: (760) 245-1661 x1864 E-mail Address: shaggard@mdaqmd.ca.gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule 

Rule 1151 was proposed for amendment to modify the coating categories and VOC limits in accordance with the 

applicable California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) Suggested Control Measure for Automotive Refinishing 

Coatings (SCM) and the Air Toxic Control Measure for Emissions of Hexavalent Chromium and Cadmium from 

Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coatings (ATCM) (Title 17 CCR, section 93112), as well as the federal 

requirements of National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Paint Stripping and Miscellaneous 

Surface Coating Operations at Area Sources (Subpart HHHHHH), and all applicable Control Techniques 

Guidelines (CTGs) and Alternative Control Technologies (ACTs). This amendment also ensured that the most 

readily available, feasible and cost-effective local control measures for Particulate Matter (PM) are being 

implemented for sources subject to this rule as pursuant to the provisions of former Health & Safety Code 

§39614(d)..

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2 

 (CO) PM TAC (name):chromium, lead, manganese, 

nickel, and cadmium, hexavalent chromium, methylene chloride.

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission factor(s) 

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined. 

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A 

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: No change.

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: N/A Area Affected: Entire District.

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible): 

No change.
 

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2 

(Electronic Format) 

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: No change.

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): 

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): 

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and 

planning. 

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split 

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 65

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100% 

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0% 

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as 

necessary): 

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No 

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) C of the Rule. 

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: 

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains: 

Emission Limits in Section(s): (C)(1),(2),(3), and (7) Work Practice Standards in Section(s): (C)(4), (5), (6), (7), and (8)

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): (E) and (F) Reporting Requirements in Section(s): 
 

5/1/2002 

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 3 

(Electronic Format) 

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

 No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment 

Discussion: N/A