### DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

14 CFR Chs. I-III

23 CFR Chs. I-III

33 CFR Chs. I and IV

46 CFR Chs. I-III

48 CFR Ch. 12

49 CFR Subtitle A, Chs. I-VI, and Chs. X-XII

OST Docket 99-5129

Department Regulatory Agenda; Semiannual Summary

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.

ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda.

SUMMARY: The Regulatory Agenda is a semiannual summary of all current and

projected rulemakings, reviews of existing regulations, and completed actions of the

Department. The intent of the Agenda is to provide the public with information about the

Dep a rtment of Transportation’s regulatory activity planned for the next 12 months. It is

### 2 expected that this information will enable the public to be more aware of and allow it to

more effectively participate in the Department’s regulatory activity. The public is also

invited to submit comments on any aspect of this Agenda.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

General

You should direct all comments and inquiries on the Agenda in general to Kathryn

Sinniger, Assistant General Counsel for Regulation and Enforcement, Department of

Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; (202) 366-4723.

Specific

You should direct all comments and inquiries on particular items in the Agenda to the

individual listed for the regulation or the general rulemaking contact person for the

operating administration in appendix B. Individuals who use a telecommunications

device for the deaf (TDD) may call (202) 755-7687.

Table of Contents

Supplementary Information:

Background

Significant/Priority Rulemakings

Explanation of Information on the Agenda

Request for Comments

### 3 Purpose

Appendix A—Instructions for Obtaining Copies of Regulatory Documents

Appendix B—General Rulemaking Contact Persons

Appendix C—Public Rulemaking Dockets

Appendix D—Review Plans for Section 610 and Other Requirements

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Improvement of our regulations is a prime goal of the Department of Transportation

(Department or DOT). Our regulations should be clear, simple, timely, fair, reasonable,

and necessary. They should not be issued without appropriate involvement of the public;

once issued, they should be periodically reviewed and revised, as needed, to assure that

they continue to meet the needs for which they originally were designed. To view

additional information about the Department of Transportation's regulatory activities

online, go to http://www.dot.gov/regulations. Among other things, this website provides a

report, updated monthly, on the status of the DOT significant rulemakings listed in the

semiannual regulatory agenda.

To help the Department achieve these goals and in accordance with Executive Order

(EO) 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review,” (58 FR 51735; Oct. 4, 1993) and the

Department’s Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; Feb. 26, 1979), the

Department prepares a semiannual regulatory agenda. It summarizes all current and

projected rulemaking, reviews of existing regulations, and completed actions of the

Department. These are matters on which action has begun or is projected during the

### 4 succeeding 12 months or such longer period as may be anticipated or for which action

has been completed since the last Agenda.

The Agendas are based on reports submitted by the offices initiating the rulemaking

and are reviewed by the Department Regulations Council.

The Internet is the basic means for disseminating the Unified Agenda. The complete

Unified Agenda is available online at www.reginfo.gov, in a format that offers users a

greatly enhanced ability to obtain information from the Agenda database.

Because publication in the Federal Register is mandated for the regulatory flexibility

agendas required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 602), DOT’s printed Agenda

entries include only:

1. The agency’s Agenda preamble;

2. Rules that are in the agency’s regulatory flexibility agenda, in accordance with the

Regulatory Flexibility Act, because they are likely to have a significant economic impact

on a substantial number of small entities; and

3. Any rules that the agency has identified for periodic review under section 610 of the

Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Printing of these entries is limited to fields that contain information required by the

Regulatory Flexibility Act’s Agenda requirements. These elements are: Sequence

Number; Title; Section 610 Review, if applicable; Legal Authority; Abstract; Timetable;

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required; Agency Contact; and Regulation Identifier

Number (RIN). Additional information (for detailed list see section heading “Explanation

### 5 of Information on the Agenda”) on these entries is available in the Unified Agenda

published on the Internet.

Significant/Priority Rulemakings

The Agenda covers all rules and regulations of the Department. We have classified

rules as a DOT agency priority in the Agenda if they are, essentially, very costly,

beneficial, controversial, or of substantial public interest under our Regulatory Policies

and Procedures. All DOT agency priority rulemaking documents are subject to review by

the Secretary of Transportation. If the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) decides

a rule is subject to its review under Executive Order 12866, we have classified it as

significant in the Agenda.

Explanation of Information on the Agenda

An Office of Management and Budget memorandum, dated August 7, 2013, requires

the format for this Agenda.

First, the Agenda is divided by initiating offices. Then, the Agenda is divided into five

categories: (1) Prerule stage, (2) proposed rule stage, (3) final rule stage, (4) long-term

actions, and (5) completed actions. For each entry, the Agenda provides the following

information: (1) its “significance”; (2) a short, descriptive title; (3) its legal basis; (4) the

related regulatory citation in the Code of Federal Regulations; (5) any legal deadline and,

if so, for what action (e.g., NPRM, final rule); (6) an abstract; (7) a timetable, including the

earliest expected date for a decision on whether to take the action; (8) whether the

rulemaking will affect small entities and/or levels of Government and, if so, which

### 6 categories; (9) whether a Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) analysis is required (for rules

that would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities);

(10) a listing of any analyses an office will prepare or has prepared for the action (with

minor exceptions, DOT requires an economic analysis for all its rulemakings); (11) an

agency contact office or official who can provide further information; (12) a Regulation

Identifier Number (RIN) assigned to identify an individual rulemaking in the Agenda and

facilitate tracing further action on the issue; (13) whether the action is subject to the

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act; (14) whether the action is subject to the Energy Act;

and (15) whether the action is major under the congressional review provisions of the

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. If there is information that does

not fit in the other categories, it will be included under a separate heading entitled

“Additional Information.” One such example of this is the letters “SB,” “IC,” “SLT.” These

refer to information used as part of our required reports on Retrospective Review of DOT

rulemakings. A “Y” or an “N,” for yes and no, respectively, follow the letters to indicate

whether or not a particular rulemaking would have effects on: small businesses (SB);

information collections (IC); or State, local, or tribal (SLT) governments.

For nonsignificant regulations issued routinely and frequently as a part of an

established body of technical requirements (such as the Federal Aviation Administration’s

Airspace Rules), to keep those requirements operationally current, we only include the

general category of the regulations, the identity of a contact office or official, and an

indication of the expected number of regulations; we do not list individual regulations.

In the “Timetable” column, we use abbreviations to indicate the particular documents

being considered. ANPRM stands for Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, SNPRM

for Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, and NPRM for Notice of Proposed

### 7 Rulemaking. Listing a future date in this column does not mean we have made a

decision to issue a document; it is the earliest date on which we expect to make a

decision on whether to issue it. In addition, these dates are based on current schedules.

Information received subsequent to the issuance of this Agenda could result in a decision

not to take regulatory action or in changes to proposed publication dates. For example,

the need for further evaluation could result in a later publication date; evidence of a

greater need for the regulation could result in an earlier publication date.

Finally, a dot ( ● ) preceding an entry indicates that the entry appears in the Agenda for the

first time.

Request for Comments

General

Our agenda is intended primarily for the use of the public. Since its inception, we

have made modifications and refinements that we believe provide the public with more

helpful information, as well as make the Agenda easier to use. We would like you, the

public, to make suggestions or comments on how the Agenda could be further improved.

Reviews

We also seek your suggestions on which of our existing regulations you believe need

to be reviewed to determine whether they should be revised or revoked. We particularly

draw your attention to the Department’s review plan in appendix D. In response to

Executive Order 13563 "Retrospective Review and Analysis of Existing Rules," we have

### 8 prepared a retrospective review plan providing more detail on the process we use to

conduct reviews of existing rules, including changes in response to Executive Order

13563. We provided the public opportunities to comment at www.regulations.gov and

Idea Scale on both our process and any existing DOT rules the public thought needed

review. The plan and the results of our review can be found at

http://www.dot.gov/regulations and http://www.dot.gov/mission/open/open-government.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Department is especially interested in obtaining information on requirements that

have a “significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities” and,

therefore, must be reviewed under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. If you have any

suggested regulations, please submit them to us, along with your explanation of why they

should be reviewed.

In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, comments are specifically invited on

regulations that we have targeted for review under section 610 of the Act. The phrase

(sec. 610 Review) appears at the end of the title for these reviews. Please see appendix

D for the Department’s section 610 review plans.

Consultation with State, Local, and Tribal Governments

Executive Orders 13132 and 13175 require us to develop an accountable process to

ensure “meaningful and timely input” by State, local, and tribal officials in the

development of regulatory policies that have federalism or tribal implications. These

policies are defined in the Executive Orders to include regulations that have “substantial

### 9 direct effects” on States or Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal

Government and them, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the

Federal Government and various levels of Government or Indian tribes. Therefore, we

encourage State and local Governments or Indian tribes to provide us with information

about how the Department’s rulemakings impact them.

Purpose

The Department is publishing this regulatory Agenda in the Federal Register to share

with interested members of the public the Department’s preliminary expectations

regarding its future regulatory actions. This should enable the public to be more aware of

the Department’s regulatory activity and should result in more effective public

participation. This publication in the Federal Register does not impose any binding

obligation on the Department or any of the offices within the Department with regard to

any specific item on the Agenda. Regulatory action, in addition to the items listed, is not

precluded.

DATED:

NAME: Anthony Foxx,

Secretary of Transportation.

Appendix A—Instructions for Obtaining Copies of Regulatory Documents

To obtain a copy of a specific regulatory document in the Agenda, you should

communicate directly with the contact person listed with the regulation at the address

### 10 below. We note that most, if not all, such documents, including the Semiannual

Regulatory Agenda, are available through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. See

appendix C for more information.

(Name of contact person), (Name of the DOT agency), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,

Washington, DC 20590. (For the Federal Aviation Administration, substitute the following

address: Office of Rulemaking, ARM-1, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington,

DC 20591).

Appendix B—General Rulemaking Contact Persons

The following is a list of persons who can be contacted within the Department for

general information concerning the rulemaking process within the various operating

administrations.

FAA—Mark Bury, Chief Counsel, International Law, Legislation and Regulations Division,

800 Independence Avenue SW., Room 915A, Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)

267-3110.

FHWA—Jennifer Outhouse, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,

Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-0761.

FMCSA

— Steven J. LaFreniere, Regulatory Ombudsman, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,

Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-0596.

### 11 NHTSA—Steve Wood, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,

Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-2992.

FRA—Kathryn Shelton, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room

W31-214, Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 493-6063.

FTA—Richard Wong, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room E56-

308, Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-0675.

SLSDC

— Carrie Mann Lavigne, Chief Counsel, 180 Andrews Street, Massena, NY

13662; telephone (315) 764-3200.

PHMSA—Patricia Burke, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,

Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-4400.

MARAD—Christine Gurland, Office of Chief Counsel, Maritime Administration, 1200 New

Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-5157.

RITA—Robert Monniere, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,

Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-5498.

OST—Kathryn Sinniger, Office of Regulation and Enforcement, 1200 New Jersey

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-4723.

Appendix C—Public Rulemaking Dockets

### 12 All comments via the Internet are submitted through the Federal Docket Management

System (FDMS) at the following address: http://www.regulations.gov. The FDMS allows

the public to search, view, download, and comment on all Federal agency rulemaking

documents in one central online system. The above referenced Internet address also

allows the public to sign up to receive notification when certain documents are placed in

the dockets.

The public also may review regulatory dockets at, or deliver comments on proposed

rulemakings to, the Dockets Office at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140,

Washington, DC 20590, 1-800-647-5527. Working Hours: 9-5.

Appendix D—Review Plans for Section 610 and Other Requirements

Part I

– The Plan

General

The Department of Transportation has long recognized the importance of regularly

reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether they need to be revised or

revoked. Our 1979 Regulatory Policies and Procedures require such reviews. We also

have responsibilities under Executive Order 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review,”

and section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act to conduct such reviews. This includes

the use of plain language techniques in new rules and considering its use in existing rules

when we have the opportunity and resources to permit its use. We are committed to

continuing our reviews of existing rules and, if needed, will initiate rulemaking actions

based on these reviews.

### 13 In accordance with Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory

Review,’’ issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department has added other

elements to its review plan. The Department has decided to improve its plan by adding

special oversight processes within the Department; encouraging effective and timely

reviews, including providing additional guidance on particular problems that warrant

review; and expanding opportunities for public participation. These new actions are in

addition to the other steps described in this appendix.

Section 610 Review Plan

Section 610 requires that we conduct reviews of rules that: (1) Have been published

within the last 10 years, and (2) have a “significant economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities” (SEIOSNOSE). It also requires that we publish in the Federal

Register each year a list of any such rules that we will review during the next year. The

Office of the Secretary and each of the Department’s Operating Administrations have a

10-year review plan. These reviews comply with section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility

Act.

Changes to the Review Plan

Some reviews may be conducted earlier than scheduled. For example, to the extent

resources permit, the plain language reviews will be conducted more quickly. Other

events, such as accidents, may result in the need to conduct earlier reviews of some

rules. Other factors may also result in the need to make changes; for example, we may

make changes in response to public comment on this plan or in response to a

presidentially-mandated review. If there is any change to the review plan, we will note

### 14 the change in the following Agenda. For any section 610 review, we will provide the

required notice prior to the review.

Part II

— The Review Process

The Analysis

Generally, the agencies have divided their rules into 10 different groups and plan to

analyze one group each year. For purposes of these reviews, a year will coincide with

the fall-to-fall schedule for publication of the Agenda. Thus, Year 1 (2008) begins in the

fall of 2008 and ends in the fall of 2009; Year 2 (2009) begins in the fall of 2009 and ends

in the fall of 2010, and so on. We request public comment on the timing of the reviews.

For example, is there a reason for scheduling an analysis and review for a particular rule

earlier than we have? Any comments concerning the plan or particular analyses should

be submitted to the regulatory contacts listed in Appendix B, General Rulemaking

Contact Persons.

Section 610 Review

The agency will analyze each of the rules in a given year’s group to determine

whether any rule has a SEIOSNOSE and, thus, requires review in accordance with

section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The level of analysis will, of course, depend

on the nature of the rule and its applicability. Publication of agencies’ section 610

analyses listed each fall in this Agenda provides the public with notice and an opportunity

to comment consistent with the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We

### 15 request that public comments be submitted to us early in the analysis year concerning

the small entity impact of the rules to help us in making our determinations.

In each fall Agenda, the agency will publish the results of the analyses it has

completed during the previous year. For rules that had a negative finding on

SEIOSNOSE, we will give a short explanation (e.g., “these rules only establish petition

processes that have no cost impact” or “these rules do not apply to any small entities”).

For parts, subparts, or other discrete sections of rules that do have a SEIOSNOSE, we

will announce that we will be conducting a formal section 610 review during the following

12 months. At this stage, we will add an entry to the Agenda in the prerulemaking

section describing the review in more detail. We also will seek public comment on how

best to lessen the impact of these rules and provide a name or docket to which public

comments can be submitted. In some cases, the section 610 review may be part of

another unrelated review of the rule. In such a case, we plan to clearly indicate which

parts of the review are being conducted under section 610.

Other Reviews

The agency will also examine the specified rules to determine whether any other

reasons exist for revising or revoking the rule or for rewriting the rule in plain language.

In each fall Agenda, the agency will also publish information on the results of the

examinations completed during the previous year.

Part III

— List of Pending Section 610 Reviews

The Agenda identifies the pending DOT section 610 Reviews by inserting “(Section

610 Review),” after the title for the specific entry. For further information on the pending

### 16 reviews, see the Agenda entries at www.reginfo.gov. For example, to obtain a list of all

entries that is in section 610 Reviews under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, a user would

select the desired responses on the search screen (by selecting “advanced search”) and,

in effect, generate the desired “index” of reviews.

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS

Year Regulations To Be Reviewed Analysis

Year Review

Year

1 49 CFR parts 91 through 99 and

14 CFR parts 200 through 212 2008 2009

2 48 CFR parts 1201 through 1253 and new parts and

subparts 2009 2010

3 14 CFR parts 213 through 232
2010 2011

4 14 CFR parts 234 through 254 2011 2012

5 14 CFR parts 255 through 298 and 49 CFR part 40 2012 2013

6 14 CFR parts 300 through 373 2013 2014

7 14 CFR parts 374 through 398 2014 2015

8 14 CFR part 399 and 49 CFR parts 1 through 11 2015 2016

9 49 CFR parts 17 through 28 2016 2017

10 49 CFR parts 29 through 39 and parts 41 through 89 2017 2018

### 17 Year 1 (fall 2008) List of rules with ongoing analysis

49 CFR part 91—International Air Transportation Fair Competitive Practices

49 CFR part 92—Recovering Debts to the United States by Salary Offset

49 CFR part 98—Enforcement of Restrictions on Post-Employment Activities

49 CFR part 99—Employee Responsibilities and Conduct

14 CFR part 200—Definitions and Instructions

14 CFR part 201

—

Air Carrier Authority Under Subtitle VII of Title 49 of the United States

Code [Amended]

14 CFR part 203

—

Waiver of Warsaw Convention Liability Limits and Defenses

14 CFR part 204

— Data to Support Fitness Determinations

14 CFR part 205

—

Aircraft Accident Liability Insurance

14 CFR part 206

—

Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity: Special

Authorizations and Exemptions

14 CFR part 207

—

Charter Trips by U.S. Scheduled Air Carriers

14 CFR part 208—Charter Trips by U.S. Charter Air Carriers

14 CFR part 211—Applications for Permits to Foreign Air Carriers

14 CFR part 212—Charter Rules for U.S. and Foreign Direct Air Carriers

Year 3 (fall 2010) List of rules with ongoing analysis

14 CFR part 213—Terms, Conditions, and Limitations of Foreign Air Carrier Permits

14 CFR part 214—Terms, Conditions, and Limitations of Foreign Air Carrier Permits

Authorizing Charter Transportation Only

14 CFR part 215—Use and Change of Names of Air Carriers, Foreign Air Carriers, and

Commuter Air Carriers

14 CFR part 216—Comingling of Blind Sector Traffic by Foreign Air Carriers

### 18 14 CFR part 217—Reporting Traffic Statistics by Foreign Air Carriers in Civilian

Scheduled, Charter, and Nonscheduled Services

14 CFR part 218—Lease by Foreign Air Carrier or Other Foreign Person of Aircraft With

Crew

14 CFR part 221—Tariffs

14 CFR part 222—Intermodal Cargo Services by Foreign Air Carriers

14 CFR part 223—Free and Reduced-Rate Transportation

14 CFR part 232—Transportation of Mail, Review of Orders of Postmaster General

Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules with ongoing analysis

14 CFR part 240—Inspection of Accounts and Property

14 CFR part 241—Uniform System of Accounts and Reports for Large Certificated Air

Carriers

14 CFR part 243—Passenger Manifest Information

14 CFR part 247—Direct Airport-to-Airport Mileage Records

14 CFR part 248—Submission of Audit Reports

14 CFR part 249—Preservation of Air Carrier Records

Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rules with ongoing analysis

14 CFR part 255—Airline Computer Reservations Systems

14 CFR part 256—[Reserved]

14 CFR part 271—Guidelines for Subsidizing Air Carriers Providing Essential Air Transportation

14 CFR part 272—Essential Air Service to the Freely Associated States

14 CFR part 291—Cargo Operations in Interstate Air Transportation

14 CFR part 292—International Cargo Transportation

### 19 14 CFR part 293—International Passenger Transportation

14 CFR part 294—Canadian Charter Air Taxi Operators

14 CFR part 296—Indirect Air Transportation of Property

14 CFR part 297—Foreign Air Freight Forwarders and Foreign Cooperative Shippers
Associations

14 CFR part 298—Exemptions for Air Taxi and Commuter Air Carrier Operations

Year 6 (2013) List of rules that will be analyzed during the next year

14 CFR part 300—Rules of Conduct in Dot Proceedings Under This Chapter

14 CFR part 302—Rules of Practice in Proceedings

14 CFR part 303—Review of Air Carrier Agreements

14 CFR part 305—Rules of Practice in Informal Nonpublic Investigations

14 CFR part 313—Implementation of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act

14 CFR part 323—Terminations, Suspensions, and Reductions of Service

14 CFR part 325—Essential Air Service Procedures

14 CFR part 330—Procedures For Compensation of Air Carriers

14 CFR part 372—Overseas Military Personnel Charters

Federal Aviation Administration

Section 610 Review Plan

The FAA has elected to use the two-step, two-year process used by most DOT modes

in past plans. As such, the FAA has divided its rules into 10 groups as displayed in the

table below. During the first year (the “analysis year ”), all rules published during the

previous 10 years within a 10 percent block of the regulations will be analyzed to identify

### 20 those with a SEIOSNOSE. During the second year (the “review year ”), each rule

identified in the analysis year as having a SEIONOSE will be reviewed in accordance

with Section 610 (b) to determine if it should be continued without change or changed to

minimize impact on small entities. Results of those reviews will be published in the DOT

Semiannual Regulatory Agenda.

.

Year Regulations To Be Reviewed Analysis

Year Review

Year

1 14 CFR parts 119 through 129 and parts 150 through

156 2008 2009

2 14 CFR parts 133 through 139 and parts 157 through

169 2009 2010

3 14 CFR parts 141 through 147 and parts 170 through

187 2010 2011

4 14 CFR parts 189 through 198 and parts 1 through 16 2011 2012

5 14 CFR parts 17 through 33 2012 2013

6 14 CFR parts 34 through 39 and parts 400 through 405 2013 2014

7 14 CFR parts 43 through 49 and parts 406 through 415 2014 2015

8 14 CFR parts 60 through 77 2015 2016

9 14 CFR parts 91 through 105 2016 2017

10 14 CFR parts 417 through 460 2017 2018

### 21 Year 6 (2013) List of rules analyzed and summary of results

14 CFR Part 34—Fuel Venting and Exhaust Emission Requirements for Turbine Engine

Powered Airplanes

• Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no

SEISNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. FAA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

14 CFR Part 35—Airworthiness Standards: Propellers

• Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no

SEISNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. FAA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

14 CFR Part 36—Noise Standards: Aircraft Type and Airworthiness Certification

• Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no

SEISNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. FAA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

14 CFR Part 39—Airworthiness Directives

### 22 • Section 610: No amendments to the codified text of this part were promulgated

during the period of review, thus there is no SEISNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed.

14 CFR Part 400—Basis and Scope

• Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no

SEISNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. FAA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

14 CFR Part 401—Organization and Definitions

• Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no

SEISNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. FAA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

14 CFR Part 404—Regulations and Licensing Requirements

• Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no

SEISNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. FAA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

### 23 14 CFR Part 405—Investigations and Enforcement

• Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no

SEISNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. FAA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

Year 7 (2014) List of rules that will be analyzed during the next year

14 CFR part 43—Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, Rebuilding, and Alteration

14 CFR part 45—Identification and Registration Marking

14 CFR part 47—Aircraft Registration

14 CFR part 49—Recording of Aircraft Titles and Security Documents

14 CFR part 406—Investigations, Enforcement, and Administrative Review

14 CFR part 413—License Application Procedures

14 CFR part 414—Safety Approvals

14 CFR part 415—Launch License

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS

Year Regulations To Be Reviewed Analysis

Year Review

Year

1 None 2008 2009

2 23 CFR parts 1 to 260 2009 2010

3 23 CFR parts 420 to 470 2010 2011

### 24 4 23 CFR part 500 2011 2012

5 23 CFR parts 620 to 637 2012 2013

6 23 CFR parts 645 to 669 2013 2014

7 23 CFR parts 710 to 924 2014 2015

8 23 CFR parts 940 to 973 2015 2016

9 23 CFR parts 1200 to 1252 2016 2017

10 New parts and subparts 2017 2018

Federal-Aid Highway Program

The FHWA has adopted regulations in title 23 of the CFR, chapter I, related to the

Federal-Aid Highway Program. These regulations implement and carry out the

provisions of Federal law relating to the administration of Federal aid for highways. The

primary law authorizing Federal aid for highways is chapter I of title 23 of the U.S.C.

section 145 of title 23 expressly provides for a federally assisted State program. For this

reason, the regulations adopted by the FHWA in title 23 of the CFR primarily relate to the

requirements that States must meet to receive Federal funds for the construction and

other work related to highways. Because the regulations in title 23 primarily relate to

States, which are not defined as small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the

FHWA believes that its regulations in title 23 do not have a significant economic impact

on a substantial number of small entities. The FHWA solicits public comment on this

preliminary conclusion.

### 25 Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rules analyzed and a summary of results

23 CFR part 620—Engineering

• Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. FHWA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

23 CFR part 625—Design Standards for Highways

• Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected.

• General: These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FHWA’s

plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. The

FHWA will update Section 625.4 (Standards, Policies, and Standard Specifications) to

reflect the most current information.

23 CFR part 626—Pavement Policy

• Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. FHWA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

23 CFR part 627—Value Engineering

• Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected.

• General: These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FHWA’s

plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. These

regulations are being updated to incorporate changes made to this part by MAP-21.

### 26 23 CFR part 630—Preconstruction Procedures

• Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. FHWA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

23 CFR part 633—Required Contract Provisions

• Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. FHWA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

23 CFR part 635—Construction and Maintenance

• Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. FHWA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

23 CFR part 636—Design-Build Contracting

• Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected.

• General: These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FHWA’s

plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. These

regulations are being updated at 23 CFR 636.209 to allow proposers to submit technical

and price proposals based on their preapproved alternative technical concepts without

### 27 submitting a base proposal to encourage a wider use of alternative technical concepts in

design-build project delivery.

23 CFR part 637—Construction Inspection and Approval

• Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. FHWA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

Year 6 (fall 2013) List of rules that will be analyzed during the next year

23 CFR part 645—Utilities

23 CFR part 646—Railroads

23 CFR part 650—Bridges, structures, and hydraulics

23 CFR part 652—Pedestrian and bicycle accommodations and projects

23 CFR part 655—Traffic Operations

23 CFR part 656—Carpool and vanpool projects

23 CFR part 657—Certification of size and weight enforcement

23 CFR part 658—Truck size and weight, route designations—length, width, and weight
limitations

23 CFR part 660—Special programs (Direct Federal)

23 CFR part 661—Indian Reservation Road Bridge Program

23 CFR part 667—[Reserved]

23 CFR part 668—Emergency relief program

23 CFR part 669—Enforcement of heavy vehicle use tax

### 28 FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION

SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS

Year Regulations To Be Reviewed Analysis Year Review Year

1 49 CFR part 372, subpart A 2008 2009

2 49 CFR part 386 2009 2010

3 49 CFR parts 325 and 390 (General) 2010 2011

4 49 CFR parts 390 (Small PassengerCarrying Vehicles), 391 to 393 and 396

to 399 2011 2012

5 49 CFR part 387 2012 2013

6 49 CFR parts 356, 367, 369 to 371,

372 (subparts B and C) 2013 2014

7 49 CFR parts 373, 374, 376, and 379 2014 2015

8 49 CFR parts 360, 365, 366, and 368 2015 2016

9 49 CFR parts 377, 378 2016 2017

10 49 CFR part 395 2017 2018

Year 3 (Fall 2010) List of Rules with Ongoing Analysis

49 CFR part 325—Compliance with Interstate Motor Carrier Noise Emission

49 CFR part 390—Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, General

Year 4 (Fall 2011) List of Rules with Ongoing Analysis

49 CFR part 390—Definition of Commercial Motor Vehicle (CMV) – Requirements for

Operators of Small Passenger-Carrying CMVs.

### 29 • This rule was moved up from Year 4 as a result of the Department’s Retrospective

Regulatory Review.

49 CFR part 391—Driver Qualifications

49 CFR part 392—Driving of Commercial Motor Vehicles

49 CFR part 393—Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation

49 CFR part 396—Inspection, Repair and Maintenance of Commercial Motor Vehicles

49 CFR part 397—Transportation of Hazardous Materials; Driving and Parking Rules

49 CFR part 398—Transportation of Migrant Workers

49 CFR part 399—Employee Safety and Health Standards

Year 5 (Fall 2012) List of Rule(s) With Ongoing Analysis

49 CFR part 387—Minimum Levels of Financial Responsibility for Motor Carriers

Year 6 (Fall 2013) List of Rule(s) that will be Analyzed this Year

49 CFR part 356—Motor Carrier Routing Regulations

49 CFR part 367—Standards for Registration with States

49 CFR part 369—Reports of Motor Carriers

49 CFR part 370—Principles and Practices for the investigation and voluntary disposition

of loss and damage claims and processing salvage

49 CFR part 371—Brokers of Property

49 CFR part 372 (subparts B and C)—Exemptions, Commercial Zones and Terminal

Areas

NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION

SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS

### 30 Year Regulations To Be Reviewed Analysis

Year Review

Year

1 49 CFR parts 571.223 through 571.500, and parts

575 and 579 2008 2009

2 23 CFR parts 1200 through 1300 2009 2010

3 49 CFR parts 501 through 526 and 571.213 2010 2011

4 49 CFR parts 571.131, 571.217, 571.220, 571.221,

and 571.222 2011 2012

5 49 CFR parts 571.101 through 571.110, and

571.135, 571.138, and 571.139 2012 2013

6 49 CFR parts 529 through 578, except parts 571

and 575 2013 2014

7 49 CFR parts 571.111 through 571.129 and parts

580 through 588 2014 2015

8 49 CFR parts 571.201 through 571.212 2015 2016

9 49 CFR parts 571.214 through 571.219, except

571.217 2016 2017

10 49 CFR parts 591 through 595 and new parts and

subparts 2017 2018

Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rules analyzed and a summary of the results

49 CFR part 571.101—Controls and Displays

• Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.

### 31 • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. NHTSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

49 CFR part 571.102—Transmission Shift Position Sequence, Starter Interlock, and

Transmission Braking Effect

• Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. NHTSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

49 CFR part 571.103—Windshield Defrosting and Defogging Systems

• Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. NHTSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

49 CFR part 571.104—Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems

• Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. NHTSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

49 CFR part 571.105—Hydraulic and Electric Brake Systems

• Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.

### 32 • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. NHTSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

49 CFR part 571.106—Brake Hoses

• Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. NHTSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

49 CFR part 571.108—Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment

• Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. NHTSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

49 CFR part 571.109—New Pneumatic and Certain Specialty Tires

• Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. NHTSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

49 CFR part 571.110—Tire Selection and Rims and Motor Home/Recreation Vehicle

Trailer Load Carrying Capacity Information for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536

Kilograms (10,000 Pounds) or Less

• Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.

### 33 • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. NHTSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

49 CFR part 571.135—Light Vehicle Brake Systems

• Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. NHTSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

49 CFR part 571.138—Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems

• Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. NHTSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

49 CFR part 571.139—New Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light Vehicles

• Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. NHTSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for

substantial revision.

Year 6 (fall 2013) List of rules that will be analyzed during the next year

49 CFR part 529—Manufacturers of Multistage Automobiles

49 CFR part 531—Passenger Automobile Average Fuel Economy Standards

### 34 49 CFR part 533—Light Truck Fuel Economy Standards

49 CFR part 534—Rights and Responsibilities of Manufacturers in the Context of

Changes in Corporate Relationships

49 CFR part 535— Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Program

49 CFR part 536—Transfer and Trading of Fuel Economy Credits

49 CFR part 537—Automotive Fuel Economy Reports

49 CFR part 538—Manufacturing Incentives for Alternative Fuel Vehicles

49 CFR part 541—New Pneumatic and Certain Specialty Tires

49 CFR part 542—Procedures for Selecting Light Duty Truck Lines to be Covered by the

Theft Prevention Standard

49 CFR part 543—Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard

49 CFR part 544—Insurer Reporting Requirements

49 CFR part 545—Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard Phase-in and SmallVolume Line Reporting Requirements

49 CFR part 551—Procedural Rules

49 CFR part 552—Petitions for Rulemaking, Defect, and Noncompliance Orders

49 CFR part 553—Rulemaking Procedures

49 CFR part 554—Standards Enforcement and Defects Investigation

49 CFR part 555—Temporary Exemption from Motor Vehicle Safety and Bumper

Standards

49 CFR part 556—Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance

49 CFR part 557—Petitions for Hearings on Notification and Remedy of Defects

49 CFR part 563—Event Data Recorders

49 CFR part 564—Replaceable Light Source and Sealed Beam Headlamp Information

49 CFR part 565—Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) Requirements

49 CFR part 566—Manufacturer Identification

### 35 49 CFR part 567—Certification

49 CFR part 568—Vehicles Manufactured in Two or More Stages-All Incomplete,

Intermediate and Final-Stage Manufacturers of Vehicles Manufactured in Two or More

Stages

49 CFR part 569—Regrooved Tires

49 CFR part 570—Vehicle In Use Inspection Standards

49 CFR part 572—Anthropomorphic Test Devices

49 CFR part 573—Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports

49 CFR part 574—Tire Identification and Recordkeeping

49 CFR part 576—Record Retention

49 CFR part 577—Defect and Noncompliance Notification

49 CFR part 578—Civil and Criminal Penalties

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION

SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS

Year Regulations To Be Reviewed Analysis

Year Review

Year

1 49 CFR parts 200 and 201 2008 2009

2 49 CFR parts 207, 209, 211, 215, 238, and 256 2009 2010

3 49 CFR parts 210, 212, 214, 217, and 268 2010 2011

4 49 CFR part 219 2011 2012

5 49 CFR parts 218, 221, 241, and 244 2012 2013

6 49 CFR parts 216, 228, and 229 2013 2014

### 36 7 49 CFR parts 223 and 233 2014 2015

8 49 CFR parts 224, 225, 231, and 234 2015 2016

9 49 CFR parts 222, 227, 235, 236, 250, 260, and 266 2016 2017

10 49 CFR parts 213, 220, 230, 232, 239, 240, and 265 2017 2018

Year 5 (Fall 2012) List of rules analyzed and a summary of results

49 CFR part 218—Railroad Operating Practices

• Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.

• General: The rule prescribes minimum requirements for railroad operating rules and

practices. No changes are needed. FRA’s plain language review of this rule indicates no

need for substantial revision.

49 CFR part 221—Rear End Marking Device – Passenger, Commuter, and Freight Trains

• Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.

• General: Since the rule prescribes minimum requirements for railroads to equip the

rear car of passenger, commuter and freight trains with highly visible markers it will

provide safety and security not only for railroad employees but also for the general public.

No changes are needed. FRA’s plain language review of this rule indicates no need for

substantial revision.

49 CFR part 241—United States Locational Requirement for Dispatching of United States

Rail Operations

• Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.

### 37 • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. FRA’s plain language review of this rule indicates no need for

substantial revision.

49 CFR part 244—Regulations on Safety Integration Plans Governing Railroad

Consolidations, Mergers and Acquisitions of Control

• Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.

• General: No changes are needed. FRA’s plain language review of this rule indicates

no need for substantial revision.

Year 6 (Fall 2013) List of rule(s) that will be analyzed during next year

49 CFR part 216—Special Notice and Emergency Order Procedures: Railroad Track,

Locomotive, and Equipment

49 CFR part 228—Hours of Service of Railroad Employees; Recordkeeping and

Reporting; Sleeping Quarters

49 CFR part 229—Railroad Locomotive Safety Standards

FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS

Year Regulations To Be Reviewed Analysis

Year Review

Year

1 49 CFR parts 604, 605, and 633 2008 2009

### 38 2 49 CFR parts 661 and 665 2009 2010

3 49 CFR part 633 2010 2011

4 49 CFR parts 609 and 611 2011 2012

5 49 CFR parts 613 and 614 2012 2013

6 49 CFR part 622 2013 2014

7 49 CFR part 630 2014 2015

8 49 CFR part 639 2015 2016

9 49 CFR parts 659 and 663 2016 2017

10 49 CFR part 665 2017 2018

Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules analyzed and summary of results

49 CFR part 609—Transportation for Elderly and Handicapped Persons

• Section 610: The agency has determined that the rule does not have a significant

effect on a substantial number of small entities.

• General: This rule was promulgated to enact the statutory requirements of sections

49 U.S.C. 5307(d) and 5308(b) to establish requirements for determining the maximum

fare that can assessed for the transportation of elderly persons and persons with

disabilities during a public transportation’s period of off-peak hours. Recently, Congress

enacted the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st 

### Century Act (MAP-21), Public Law

11 2 -141, (2012). The underlying purpose for the rule was unchanged by Map-21;

however, the reference to maximum fares in section 5308(b) was repealed long ago and

MAP-21 amended 49 U.S.C. section 5307. Therefore, in Fiscal Year 2014, FTA plans to

issue a rulemaking to implement technical corrections to the authority and applicability

sections of 49 CFR part 609.

### 39 49 CFR part 611—Major Capital Investment Projects

• Section 610: The agency has determined that the rule does not have a significant

effect on a substantial number of small entities. FTA recently revised the rule and

evaluated the likely effects of the final rule on small entities and requested public

comment during the rulemaking process. FTA determined that the rule does not have a

significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because small

entities do not generally undertake the development of major capital projects. There

were no public comments submitted on this issue during the rulemaking process.

• General: FTA revised part 611 via a final rule in January 2013, in order to implement

recent MAP-21 amendments to 49 U.S.C. section 5309( see 78 Fed. Reg. 1992). The

“New Starts” and “Small Starts” programs authorized by section 5309 are FTA’s primary

capital funding programs for new or extended transit systems. Part 611 of the Code of

Federal Regulations outlines the process by which FTA rates and evaluates grants

proposals for these programs. With the revised rule, FTA has significantly streamlined its

evaluation process for both programs.

Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rule(s) analyzed and summary of results

49 CFR part 613—Planning Assistance and Standards

• Section 610: The Agency has determined that the rule does not have a significant

effect on a substantial number of small entities because it is only applicable to States and

metropolitan planning organizations which are not included in the definition of small entity

as set forth in 5 U.S.C. 601.

• General: The rule was promulgated to govern the development of metropolitan

transportation plans and programs for urbanized areas, State transportation plans and

programs, and the congestion management process. Recently, Congress amended the

### 40 planning statutes when it enacted the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act

(MAP-21), Public Law 112-141, (2012). In Fiscal Year 2014, FTA will undertake a joint

notice of proposed rulemaking with FHWA in order to revise the regulations consistent

with current statutory requirements. In doing so, FHWA and FTA will propose

establishing a performance-based approach to transportation decisionmaking.

49 CFR part 614—Transportation Infrastructure Management

• Section 610: The Agency has determined that the rule does not have a significant

effect on a substantial number of small entities as it only cross-references 23 CFR part

500, a FHWA regulation which is applicable to States.

• General: No changes are needed at this time. However, FTA will continue to work

with FHWA to assess whether or not technology will warrant revisions to the regulation.

Year 6: List of rules that will be analyzed during the next year

49 CFR part 622—Environmental Impact and Related Procedures

MARITIME ADMINISTRATION

SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS

Year Regulations To Be Reviewed Analysis Year Review Year

1 46 CFR parts 201 through 205 2008 2009

2 46 CFR parts 221 through 232 2009 2010

3 46 CFR parts 249 through 296 2010 2011

### 41 4 46 CFR parts 221, 298, 308,

and 309 2011 2012

5 46 CFR parts 307 through 309 2012 2013

6 46 CFR part 310 2013 2014

7 46 CFR parts 315 through 340 2014 2015

8 46 CFR parts 345 through 381 2015 2016

9 46 CFR parts 382 through 389 2016 2017

10 46 CFR parts 390 through 393 2017 2018

Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules with ongoing analysis

46 CFR part 381—Cargo Preference—U.S.-Flag Vessels

46 CFR part 383—Cargo Preference—Compromise, Assessment, Mitigation, Settlement

& Collection of Civil Penalties

46 CFR part 221—Foreign Transfer Regulations

46 CFR part 249—Approval of Underwriters for Marine Hull Insurance

46 CFR part 272—Requirements and Procedures for Conducting Condition Surveys and

Administering Maintenance and Repair Subsidy

46 CFR part 287—Establishment of Construction Reserve Funds

46 CFR part 295—Maritime Security Program (MSP)

46 CFR part 296—Maritime Security Program (MSP)

Year 5 (2012) List of rules with ongoing analysis

46 CFR part 307—Mandatory Position Report System for Vessels

46 CFR part 308—War Risk Insurance

46 CFR part 309—War Risk Ship Valuation

### 42 Year 6 (2013) List of rules that will be analyzed during the next year

46 CFR part 310—Merchant Marine Training

PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION (PHMSA)

SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS

Year Regulations To Be Reviewed Analysis

Year Review

Year

1 49 CFR part 178 2008 2009

2 49 CFR parts 178 through 180 2009 2010

3 49 CFR parts 172 and 175 2010 2011

4 49 CFR part 171, sections 171.15 and 171.16 2011 2012

5 49 CFR parts 106, 107, 171, 190, and 195 2012 2013

6 49 CFR parts 174, 177, 191, and 192 2013 2014

7 49 CFR parts 176 and 199 2014 2015

8 49 CFR parts 172 through 178 2015 2016

9 49 CFR parts 172, 173, 174, 176, 177, and 193 2016 2017

10 49 CFR parts 173 and 194 2017 2018

Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rules analyzed and a summary of results

49 CFR part 106—Rulemaking Procedures;

49 CFR part 107—Hazardous Materials Program Procedures; and

49 CFR part 171—General Information, Regulations, and Definitions

### 43 • Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. On May 9, 2013 (78 FR 27169) PHMSA

published the intent to review and analyze regulations in its Unified Agenda and

Regulatory Plan to identify requirements which may have a significant impact on a

substantial number of small entities. Specifically, PHMSA provided an initial review and

requested comments on the impact of the rules in 49 CFR parts 106, 107, and 171 on

small businesses. In addition, PHMSA asked the following questions of small

businesses:

1. How and to what degree these rules affect you;

2. Any complaints or comments you may have concerning the covered rules;

3. The complexity of the covered rules;

4. The extent to which the rules overlap, duplicate or conflict with other Federal

rules, and to the extent feasible, with State and local Government rules; and

5. The extent of the economic impact on you and why you believe the economic

impact is significant.”

Two comments were received in response to the notice (notice and comments are

available for review at: http://www.regulations.gov; under Docket No. PHMSA-2013-

0027). The comments did not directly relate to the rules under review or the impacts

those rules on small businesses. Based on PHMSA’s initial review of these rules and

evaluation of the comments received, the Agency has determined that the rules do not

have a significant effect on a substantial number of small entities.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. PHMSA’s plain language review of this rule indicates no need for

substantial revision.

49 CFR part 190—Pipeline Safety Programs and Rulemaking Procedures

### 44 • Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. Based on regulated entities, PHMSA found

that the majority of operators are not small businesses. Therefore, though some small

entities may be affected the economic impact on small entities will not be significant.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. PHMSA’s plain language review indicates no need for substantial

revision.

49 CFR part 195—Transportation of Hazardous Liquids by Pipeline

• Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. Based on regulated entities, PHMSA found

that the majority of operators are not small businesses. Therefore, though some small

entities may be affected the economic impact on small entities will not be significant.

• General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose

the least burden. PHMSA’s plain language review indicates no need for substantial

revision.

Year 6 (fall 2013) List of rules that will be analyzed during the next year

49 CFR part 174—Carriage by Rail

49 CFR part 177—Carriage by Public Highway

49 CFR part 191—Transportation of Natural and Other Gas by Pipeline; Annual Reports,

Incident Reports, and Safety Related Condition Reports

49 CFR part 192— Transportation of Natural and Other Gas by Pipeline: Minimum

Federal Safety Standards

RESEARCH AND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION (RITA)

SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS

### 45 Year Regulations To Be Reviewed Analysis

Year Review

Year

1 14 CFR part 241, form 41 2008 2009

2 14 CFR part 241, schedule T-100, and part 217 2009 2010

3 14 CFR part 298 2010 2011

4 14 CFR part 241, section 19-7 2011 2012

5 14 CFR part 291 2012 2013

6 14 CFR part 234 2013 2014

7 14 CFR part 249 2014 2015

8 14 CFR part 248 2015 2016

9 14 CFR part 250 2016 2017

10 14 CFR part 374a, ICAO 2017 2018

Year 1 (fall 2008) List of rules with ongoing analysis

14 CFR part 241—Uniform System of Accounts and Reports for Large Certificated Air

Carriers, Form 41

Year 3 (fall 2010) List of rules with ongoing analysis

14 CFR part 298, subpart f—Exemptions for Air Taxi and Commuter Air Carrier

Operations—Reporting Requirements

Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules with ongoing analysis

14 CFR part 241, section 19-7—Passenger Origin-Destination Survey

### 46 Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rules with ongoing analysis

14 CFR part 291—Cargo Operations in Interstate Air Transportation

Year 6 (fall 2013) List of rules that will be analyzed during the next year

14 CFR Part 234—Airline Service Quality Performance Reports

SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS

Year Regulations To Be Reviewed Analysis

Year Review

Year

1 33 CFR parts 401 through 403 2008 2009

Year 1 (fall 2008) List of rules with ongoing analysis

33 CFR part 401—Seaway Regulations and Rules

33 CFR part 402—Tariff of Tolls

33 CFR part 403—Rules of Procedure of the Joint Tolls Review BoardThe 220 Regulatory Agendas

Office of the Secretary - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Enhanced Consumer Protections for Charter Air Transportation 2105-AD66

Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections III 2105-AE11

Carrier-Supplied Medical Oxygen, Accessible In-Flight Entertainment Systems, Service Animals, and Accessible Lavatories on Single-Aisle Aircraft 2105-AE12

Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs: Revision of Substance Abuse Professional Credential Requirement 2105-AE24

Office of the Secretary - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Protection of Sensitive Security Information 2105-AD59

Accessibility of Airports 2105-AD91

Smoking of Electronic Cigarettes On Commercial Aircraft 2105-AE06

Incidents Involving Death, Loss, or Injury of Animals 2105-AE07

Transportation for Individuals With Disabilities: Reasonable Modification 2105-AE15

Miscellaneous Amendments; Transportation for Individuals with Disabilities (RRR) 2105-AE25

Office of the Secretary - Long-term Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE Program Improvements, Phase 2) (RRR) 2105-AE08

Transportation for Individuals with Disabilities: Passenger Vessel Accessibility Standards 2105-AE23

Office of the Secretary - Completed Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Use of the Seat-Strapping Method for Carrying a Wheelchair on an Aircraft 2105-AD87

Accessibility of Carrier Websites and Ticket Kiosks 2105-AD96

Advisory Committees (RRR) 2105-AE22

Federal Aviation Administration - PreRule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Drug and Alcohol Testing of Certain Maintenance Provider Employees Located Outside of the United States 2120-AK09

Federal Aviation Administration - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Airspace Actions 2120-AA66

Air Carrier Contract Maintenance Requirements 2120-AJ33

Airport Safety Management System 2120-AJ38

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) 2120-AJ60

Flight Crewmember Mentoring, Leadership, and Professional Development (HR 5900) 2120-AJ87Slot Management and Transparency for LaGuardia Airport, John F. Kennedy International Airport, and Newark Liberty International Airport 2120-AJ89

Effective Tether System (Tether Rule) (RRR) 2120-AJ90

Enhanced Flight Vision System (EFVS) (RRR) 2120-AJ94

Exiting Icing 2120-AJ95

Public Risk Criteria for Launch and Reentry (Risk Rule) 2120-AK06

Flight Simulation Training Device (FSTD) Qualification Standards for Extended Envelope and Adverse Weather Event Training 2120-AK08

Harmonization of Airworthiness Standards-Gust and Maneuver Load Requirements 2120-AK12

Harmonization of Airworthiness Standards--Miscellaneous Structures Requirements 2120-AK13

Disclosure of Seat Dimensions to Facilitate the Use of Child Restraint Systems on Aircraft (FAA Reauthorization) 2120-AK17

Production and Airworthiness Certification II 2120-AK20

Prohibition of Tail End Ferry in Part 121 (Reauthorization) 2120-AK22

Fuel Tank and System Lightning Protection (RRR) 2120-AK24

Part 61 and 91 Recommended Rule Changes (Retrospective Regulatory Review) 2120-AK28

Harmonization of Airworthiness Standards Fire Extinguishers and Class B and F Cargo Compartments 2120-AK29

Requirements for Protection of Fuel Tanks from Flame Propagation through Fuel Vent Lines 2120-AK30

Flammability Requirements for Transport Category Airplanes 2120-AK34

Federal Aviation Administration - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Airworthiness Directives 2120-AA64

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures 2120-AA65

Prohibition on Personal Use of Electronic Devices on the Flight Deck (Personal Use of PEDs) 2120-AJ17

Supercooled Large Droplet Icing Conditions 2120-AJ34

Student Pilot Application Requirements (Formerly Photo Requirements for Pilot Certificates) 2120-AJ42

Air Ambulance and Commercial Helicopter Operations; Safety Initiatives and Miscellaneous Amendments 2120-AJ53

Flight and Duty Time Limitations and Rest Requirements 2120-AJ58

Repair Stations 2120-AJ61

Safety Management Systems for Part 121 Certificate Holders 2120-AJ86

Stage 3 Helicopter Noise Certification Standards 2120-AJ96

Minimum Altitudes for Use of Autopilots (RRR) 2120-AK11

Flight Data Recorder Airplane Parameter Specification Omission and Correction 2120-AK27

SFAR 106 Amendment to Add Chart Sequal Technologys eQuinox and Vbox Trooper Portable Oxygen System (POC) (Use of Additional Portable Oxygen Concentrator Devices on Board Aircraft) 2120-AK35

Requirements for Chemical Oxygen Generators Installed on Transport Category Airplanes (Chemical Oxygen Standards) 2120-AK36

Federal Aviation Administration - Long-term Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Part 95 Instrument Flight Rules 2120-AA63

Prohibition Against Certain Flights Within the Territory and Airspace of Afghanistan 2120-AJ69

Requirement for Wildlife Assessments at Certificated Airports 2120-AJ71

Regulation Of Flight Operations Conducted By Alaska Guide Pilots 2120-AJ78

Air Carrier Maintenance Training Program 2120-AJ79

System Safety Assessment 2120-AJ99

Prohibition of Tail -End Ferry in Part 135 (FAA Reauthorization) 2120-AK26

Pilot Records Database (HR 5900) 2120-AK31

Acceptance Criteria for Portable Oxygen Concentrators Used Onboard Aircraft (RRR) 2120-AK32

Pilot Biometric Certificates (FAA Reauthorization) 2120-AK33

Federal Aviation Administration - Completed ActionTitle Regulation
Identifier
Number

Qualification, Service, and Use of Crewmembers and Aircraft Dispatchers 2120-AJ00

Pilot Certification and Qualification Requirements (Formerly First Officer Qualification Requirements) (HR 5900) 2120-AJ67

Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings (RRR) 2120-AJ97

Combined Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs for Operators Conducting Commercial Air Tours (RRR) 2120-AK01

Exhaust Emissions Standards for New Aircraft Gas Turbine Engines and Identification Plate for Aircraft Engines (NOx Emissions Rule Update) 2120-AK15

Certified Flight Instructor Flight Reviews, Recent Pilot in Command Experience, Airmen Online Services 2120-AK23

Terminating Operations of Jets of Weights At or Less Than 75,000 lbs. and Not Stage 3 Noise Compliant (Reauthorization) 2120-AK25

Federal Highway Administration - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

National Tunnel Inspection Standards (MAP-21) 2125-AF24

National Goals and Performance Management Measures (MAP-21) 2125-AF49

Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program (MAP-21) 2125-AF50

Statewide and Nonmetropolitan Transportation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation Planning (MAP-21) 2125-AF52

National Goals and Performance Management Measures (MAP-21) 2125-AF53

National Goals and Performance Management Measures (MAP-21) 2125-AF54

National Bridge Inspection Standards (MAP-21) 2125-AF55

Highway Safety Improvement Program (MAP-21) 2125-AF56

Risk-Based Asset Management Plan (MAP-21) 2125-AF57

Design Build Alternative Technical Concepts 2125-AF58

Additional Categorical Exclusions under NEPA (MAP-21) 2125-AF59

Construction Manager, General Contractor (MAP-21) 2125-AF61

Acquisition of Right -of-Way (RRR; MAP-21) 2125-AF62

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (MAP-21) 2125-AF63

Value Engineering 2125-AF64

Federal Highway Administration - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service Contracts (RRR) 2125-AF44

Environmental Impact and Related Procedures (MAP-21) 2125-AF48

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Carrier Safety Fitness Determination 2126-AB11

Commercial Driver's License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse (MAP-21) 2126-AB18

Electronic Logging Devices and Hours of Service Supporting Documents (MAP-21) 2126-AB20

Lease and Interchange of Vehicles; Motor Carriers of Passengers 2126-AB44

Inspection, Repair, and Maintenance; Driver-Vehicle Inspection Report (RRR) 2126-AB46

MAP-21 Enhancements to the Unified Registration System (MAP-21) 2126-AB56

Prohibition of Coercion (MAP-21) 2126-AB57

Definition of Tank Vehicle with Respect to Commercial Driver's License Holders 2126-AB61

Heavy Vehicle Speed Limiters 2126-AB63

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration - Final Rule

Title Regulation
IdentifierNumber

Patterns of Safety Violations by Motor Carrier Management (MAP-21) 2126-AB42

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration - Long-term Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Qualifications of Drivers; Diabetes Standard 2126-AA95

Minimum Training Requirements for Entry Level Commercial Motor Vehicle Operations (MAP-21) 2126-AB06

New Entrant Safety Assurance Process: Implementation of Section 210(b) of the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act
of 1999 2126-AB17

Medical Examiner's Certification Integration (MAP-21) 2126-AB40

Electronic Signatures (E-Signatures) (RRR) 2126-AB47

Elimination of Redundant Maintenance Rule (RRR) 2126-AB49

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration - Completed Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Unified Registration System 2126-AA22

Highway-Rail Grade Crossing; Safe Clearance 2126-AB04

Amendments to Implement Certain Provisions of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act;
Final Rule 2126-AB60

Incorporation by Reference of Out-of-Service Criteria 2126-AB62

General Technical, Organizational, and Conforming Amendments to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations 2126-AB64

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Alternative Fuel Vehicle Badging and Fuel Compartment Labels on Alternative Fuel Usage 2127-AK75

Tire Fuel Efficiency Consumer Information--Part 2 2127-AK76

Heavy Vehicle Speed Limiters 2127-AK92

Establish Side Impact Performance Requirements for Child Restraint Systems (MAP-21) 2127-AK95

Motorcoach Rollover Structural Integrity (MAP-21) 2127-AK96

FMVSS No. 218 and Enforcement Policy Concerning Novelty Helmets 2127-AL01

Q3s 3-year-old Side Impact Dummy (MAP-21 2127-AL04

Amend FMVSS No. 210 to Incorporate the Use of a New Force Application Device (RRR) 2127-AL05

Importation of Motor Vehicles Not Originally Manufactured to Comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards 2127-AL06

Amendment to Part 543; Technical Performance Requirements for Immobilizer Devices 2127-AL08

Amend Definition of 3-Wheeled Vehicles 2127-AL15

Upgrade of LATCH Usability Requirements (MAP-21) 2127-AL20

New FMVSS, Lamps and Reflective Devices for Agricultural Equipment (MAP-21) 2127-AL28

Part 575 Vehicle Defect Reporting Requirements 2127-AL33

Rear Seat Belt Reminder System 2127-AL37

FMVSS No. 571.108 License Plate Mounting Angle 2127-AL41

Registered Importers of Vehicles Not Originally Manufactured to Conform to the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards 2127-AL43

Regulatory Update of Transfer and Sanction Programs 2127-AL45

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Require Installation of Seat Belts on Motorcoaches, FMVSS No. 208 (MAP-21) 2127-AK56

Electronic Stability Control Systems for Heavy Vehicles (MAP-21) 2127-AK97

Response to Petitions for Reconsideration (Part 2)--Designated Seating Position and Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages 2127-AL13Make Inoperative Exemptions, Vehicle Modifications to Accommodate People With Disabilities, From FMVSS No. 226 2127-AL17

Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108, "Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment" 2127-AL27

Petitions for Reconsideration of 10-Year-Old Dummy Into FMVSS No. 213 2127-AL35

Organization and Delegation of Duties 2127-AL46

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration - Long-term Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

FMVSS No. 124, Accelerator Control Systems Upgrade 2127-AK18

Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 111, Rearview Mirrors 2127-AK43

Mandatory Event Data Recorder Requirements 2127-AK86

FMVSS 114, Theft Protection and Rollaway Prevention, Keyless Ignition Systems 2127-AK88

Sound for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles 2127-AK93

Pedestrian Safety Global Technical Regulation (RRR) 2127-AK98

Part 571 FMVSS No. 205, Glazing Materials, GTR (RRR) 2127-AL03

Consumer Information on Fuel Economy, Emissions, and Alternative Fuel Usage 2127-AL12

Rapid Tire Deflation Test in FMVSS No. 110 (RRR) 2127-AL24

Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety Programs (MAP-21) 2127-AL30

Direct Final Rulemaking Procedures 2127-AL32

Upgrade FMVSS No. 213 for Improved Child Occupant Protection 2127-AL34

Advanced Glazing and Anti-Ejection Countermeasures 2127-AL36

MAP-21 Civil Penalties Interpretation 2127-AL38

Electronic Disclosure of Odometer Requirements 2127-AL39

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration - Completed Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Early Warning Reporting and Foreign Defect Reporting Regulation (MAP-21) 2127-AK72

Corrections and Minor Revisions to the MY 2014-2018 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles 2127-AL31

Ejection Mitigation Reconsideration 2127-AL40

Theft Prevention – 2014 Light Duty Truck Lines and Exempted Vehicle Lines 2127-AL42

Federal Railroad Administration - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Critical Incident Stress Plan; "Critical Incident" Definition 2130-AC00

Alcohol and Controlled Substance Testing for Maintenance-of-Way Employees 2130-AC10

Risk Reduction Program 2130-AC11

Passenger Train Door Operation and Door Safety Requirements 2130-AC34

Qualification and Certification of Locomotive Engineers; Miscellaneous Revisions (RRR) 2130-AC40

Hours of Service Recordkeeping; Electronic Recordkeeping Amendments (RRR) 2130-AC41

Use of Locomotive Horns at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings; Miscellaneous Revisions 2130-AC42

Safety Glazing Standards; Miscellaneous Revisions (RRR) 2130-AC43

Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program Application Requirements 2130-AC45

Passenger Equipment Safety Standards; Standards for Alternative Compliance and High-Speed Trainsets 2130-AC46

Federal Railroad Administration - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Roadway Worker Protection; Miscellaneous Revisions 2130-AB89

Training Standards for Railroad Employees 2130-AC06Emergency Escape Breathing Apparatus 2130-AC14

Passenger Train Emergency Systems; Doors, Emergency Lighting, Emergency Signage and Markings for Egress and Access, and Low-Location Emergency Exit Path Marking; Miscellaneous Amendments 2130-AC22

National Highway-Rail Crossing Inventory Reporting Requirements 2130-AC26

Track Safety Standards: Improving Rail Integrity 2130-AC28

Railroad System Safety Program 2130-AC31

Positive Train Control Systems: De Minimis Exception, Yard Movements, En Route Failures; Miscellaneous Grade Crossing/Signal and Train Control Amendments (RRR) 2130-AC32

Revisions to Passenger Train Emergency Preparedness Regulations (Part 239) 2130-AC33

Roadway Worker Protection; Adjacent-Track On-Track Safety--Response to Petitions for Reconsideration 2130-AC37

Revisions to Signal System Reporting Requirements (RRR) 2130-AC44

Federal Transit Administration - PreRule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Transit Asset Management 2132-AB07

National and Public Transportation Safety Plans (MAP-21) and Transit Asset Management 2132-AB20

Federal Transit Administration - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Private Sector Participation 2132-AB06

Statewide and Nonmetropolitan Transportation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation Planning (MAP-21) 2132-AB10

Bus Testing: Pass/Fail and Safety Criteria (MAP-21) 2132-AB11

Additional Categorical Exclusions Under NEPA (MAP-21) 2132-AB14

Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program 2132-AB15

Buy America: Amendments (MAP-21) 2132-AB16

Core Capacity Projects (MAP-21) 2132-AB17

New and Small Start Projects (MAP-21) 2132-AB18

State Safety Oversight (MAP-21) 2132-AB19

Federal Transit Administration - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Environmental Impact and Related Procedures (MAP-21) 2132-AB05

Public Transportation Emergency Relief Program (MAP-21) 2132-AB13

Maritime Administration - PreRule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

National Shipping Authority, Ship Manager Citizenship 2133-AB87

Maritime Administration - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Marine Highway Corridor Expansion 2133-AB84

American Fisheries Act 2133-AB86

Maritime Administration - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Maritime Security Program Extension 2133-AB85Maritime Administration - Long-term Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Regulations To Be Followed by All Departments, Agencies and Shippers Having Responsibility To Provide a Preference for U.S.-Flag Vessels in the Shipment of Cargoes on Ocean Vessels 2133-AB74

Maritime Administration - Completed Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Cruise Vessel Security and Safety Act of 2010 2133-AB83

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - PreRule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Hazardous Materials: Rail Petitions and Recommendations to Improve the Safety of Railroad Tank Car Transportation (RRR) 2137-AE91

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Hazardous Materials: Bulk Loading and Unloading Operations 2137-AE37

Hazardous Materials: Adoption of American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section XII and the Nat'l Board Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors Code 2137-AE58

Pipeline Safety: Safety of On-Shore Liquid Hazardous Pipelines 2137-AE66

Pipeline Safety: Excess Flow Valves In Applications Other Than Single-Family Residences in Gas Distribution Systems 2137-AE71

Pipeline Safety: Gas Transmission (RRR) 2137-AE72

Hazardous Materials: Miscellaneous Pressure Vessel Requirements (DOT Spec Cylinders) (RRR) 2137-AE80

Hazardous Materials: Reverse Logistics (RRR) 2137-AE81

Pipeline Safety: Periodic Updates of Regulatory References to Technical Standards and Miscellaneous Amendments (RRR) 2137-AE85

Hazardous Materials: Requirements for the Safe Transportation of Bulk Explosives (RRR) 2137-AE86

Pipeline Safety: Issues related to the use of Plastic Pipe in Gas Pipeline Industry 2137-AE93

Pipeline Safety: Operator Qualification, Cost Recovery and other Pipeline Safety Proposed Changes (RRR) 2137-AE94

Hazardous Materials: Failure to Pay Provision (MAP-21) 2137-AE97

Hazardous Materials: Special Permit Standard Operating Procedures and Evaluation 2137-AE99

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Hazardous Materials: Compatibility with the Regulations of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (RRR) 2137-AE38

Pipeline Safety: Enforcement of State Excavation Damage Laws 2137-AE43

Hazardous Materials: Revisions to Requirements for the Transportation of Lithium Batteries 2137-AE44

Hazardous Materials: Safety Requirements for External Product Piping on Cargo Tanks Transporting Flammable Liquids (Wetlines) 2137-AE53

Pipeline Safety: Miscellaneous Amendments to the Pipeline Safety Regulations 2137-AE59

Hazardous Materials: Incorporation of Certain Special Permits and Competent Authorities into the HMR (RRR) 2137-AE82

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - Long-term Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Hazardous Materials: Incorporation of Special Permits Into the Hazardous Materials Regulations (MAP-21) 2137-AF00

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - Completed ActionTitle Regulation
Identifier
Number

Hazardous Materials: Approval and Communication Requirements for the Safe Transportation of Air Bag Inflators, Air Bag Modules, and Seat-Belt Pretensioners (RRR) 2137-AE62

Hazardous Materials: Highway -Rail Grade Crossing; Safe Clearance 2137-AE69

Hazardous Materials: Revision of Requirements for Fireworks Approvals (RRR) 2137-AE70

Pipeline Safety: Pipeline Safety Enforcement and Regulatory Procedures 2137-AE92

Hazardous Materials: Resumption of Transportation (MAP-21) 2137-AE98

Hazardous Materials: Corrections and Response to Appeals (HM-215K, HM-215L, HM-218G and HM-219) 2137-AF01

Hazardous Materials: Penalty Guidelines 2137-AF02

Hazardous Materials: Minor Editorial Corrections and Clarifications 2137-AF03

Research and Innovative Technologies Administration - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Reporting Ancillary Airline Passenger Revenues 2139-AA13

Department of Transportation (DOT) Office of the Secretary ( OST ) RIN: 2105-AD66

View Related Documents

Title: Enhanced Consumer Protections for Charter Air Transportation

Abstract: The U.S. Department of Transportation (Department) is seeking comment on the following proposals to strengthen the legal protections provided to consumers for charter air transportation: (1) enumerating certain prohibited unfair and deceptive practices by air taxis registered with the Department under 14 CFR part 298 and, as recommended by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), requiring air taxis that sell charter air transportation, but rely on others to perform that air transportation, to disclose, among other things, at the time an air charter contract is arranged and anytime thereafter if such information changes, the name of the direct air carrier actually operating that service and any other name in which that direct air carrier holds itself out to the public; (2) creating a new class of indirect air carriers (i.e., air charter brokers) to provide single entity charter air transportation of passengers aboard large and small aircraft, establishing required disclosures for air charter brokers to give to their customers, and enumerating certain prohibited unfair and deceptive practices by air charter brokers; (3) codifying the exemption authority granted in 1983 to the class of indirect air carriers that provide air ambulance services and establishing required disclosures by such carriers to the public; and (4) making clear and codifying that the air services performed under contract with the Federal Government are in common carriage.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 298 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 329; 49 USC 401, 411, and 417; 49 USC 106(g), 447 and 451 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 01/26/2007 72 FR 3773

ANPRM Comment Period End 03/27/2007

NPRM 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Blane A Workie Attorney Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-9342
TDD Phone: 202 755-7687
FAX: 202 366-7152
E -Mail: blane.workie@ost.dot.govDepartment of Transportation (DOT) Office of the Secretary ( OST ) RIN: 2105-AE11

View Related Documents

Title: Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections III

Abstract: This rulemaking would address the following issues: (1) whether the Department should require a marketing carrier to provide assistance to its code-share partner when a flight operated by the code-share partner experiences a lengthy tarmacdelay; (2) whether the Department should enhance disclosure requirements on code-share operations, including requiring ontime performance data, reporting of certain data code-share operations, and codifying the statutory amendment of 49 U.S.C.41712(c) regarding website schedule disclosure of code-share operations; (3) whether the Department should expand the ontime performance "reporting carrier" pool to include smaller carriers; (4) whether the Department should require travel agents to adopt minimum customer service standards in relation to the sale of air transportation; (5) whether the Department should require ticket agents to disclose the carriers whose tickets they sell or do not sell and information regarding any incentive payments they receive in connection with the sale of air transportation; (6) whether the Department should require ticket agents to disclose any preferential display of individual fares or carriers in the ticket agent ́s internet displays; (7) whether the Department should require additional or special disclosures regarding certain substantial fees, e.g., oversize or overweight baggage fees; (8) whether the Department should prohibit post-purchase price increase for all services and products not purchased with the ticket or whether it is sufficient to prohibit post-purchase prices increases for baggage charges that traditionally have been included in the ticket price; and (9) whether the Department should require that ancillary fees be displayed through all sale channels.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 244; 14 CFR 250; 14 CFR 253; 14 CFR 259; 14 CFR 399 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 41712; 49 USC 40101;49 USC 41702 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: On April 25, 2011, the Department of Transportation published in the Federal Register a final rule on Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections (76 Fed. Reg. 23110). Among other requirements, the rule contains several requirements for U.S. and foreign air carriers, ticket agents, and other sellers of air transportation to disclose to consumers the cost of certain ancillary services. The rule requires disclosure through various methods. One issue the rulemaking requested comment on was whether the Department should require information regarding the cost of airline ancillary services to be displayed through Global Distribution Systems in order to enhance transparency of such fees to consumers. Because the Department lacked critical information on the issue, the Department deferred the issue to this rulemaking. This rulemaking will deal with that issue as well as several other airline consumer protection proposals.

Legal Basis: The Department has authority and responsibility under 49 U.S.C. section 41712, in concert with 49 U.S.C. 40101 and 49 U.S.C. section 41702, to protect consumers from unfair and deceptive practices and to ensure safe and adequate service in air transportation.

Alternatives: One alternative would be to take no regulatory action. Also, various regulatory alternatives will be developed and the public will be afforded an opportunity to provide comments when the Department publishes the proposed rule in the Federal Register.

Costs and Benefits: Preliminary Estimates: $ 67 million in costs over 10 years at 7% discount rate. Preliminary Estimates: $125 million in benefits over 10 years at 7% discount rate.

Risks: The risk of not taking regulatory action would be the continuation of a system where passengers cannot determine the
true cost of their air travel.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Additional Information: Related Final Rule issued on April 25, 2011 (76 FR 23110, RIN 2105-AD92).

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2105- AD72; Related to 2105- AD92 Agency Contact: Blane A WorkieAttorney Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-9342
TDD Phone: 202 755-7687
FAX: 202 366-7152
E -Mail: blane.workie@ost.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Office of the Secretary ( OST ) RIN: 2105-AE12

View Related Documents

Title: Carrier-Supplied Medical Oxygen, Accessible In-Flight Entertainment Systems, Service Animals, and Accessible Lavatories on Single-Aisle Aircraft

Abstract: This is the second of two supplemental notices of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to follow-up on air travel accessibility issues discussed in the preamble of the 2008 final Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA) rule but deferred for final decisionto a later rulemaking. (The first SNPRM is RIN 2105-AD96.) This rulemaking action would consider (1) whether there are safetyrelated reasons for excluding service animals other than dogs that may be specific to foreign carriers; (2) whether carriers should be required to supply in-flight medical oxygen for a fee to passengers who require it to access air transportation; (3) whether providing accessible in-flight entertainment to passengers with disabilities is technically and economically feasible; (4) whether certain changes should be made to provisions allowing carriers to require medical documentation and 48 hours advance notice from users of emotional support and psychiatric service animals; and (5) whether carriers should be required to report to the Department annually the number of requests for wheelchair assistance they receive. The rulemaking would also seek public comment on the feasibility of requiring accessible lavatories on certain single-aisle aircraft, expanding the applicability of certain required seating accommodations, and clarifications of certain requirements pertaining to the carriage of
service animals.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 382 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 41702; 49 USC 41712; 49 USC 47105 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rulemaking action would examine whether the Department should require carriers to provide in-flight medical oxygen, captioning on in-flight entertainment (IFE) systems, and accessible lavatories on single-aisle aircraft to provide individuals with disabilities greater access to air travel. Currently, few airlines make in-flight medical oxygen available to passengers and as a result individuals who are dependent on medical oxygen but cannot use portable oxygen concentrators are having difficulty traveling by air. Also, passengers who are deaf or hard-of-hearing have strongly advocated for captioning of IFE systems, arguing that the in-flight entertainment that is available to other passengers should also be available to them. Lavatories on single-aisle aircraft have also become a matter of interest to the Department as more and more single-aisle aircraft are used for longer flights and the absence of accessible lavatories makes travel difficult for passengers with disabilities. This rulemaking action will also address whether to amend the existing regulation which allows airlines to require users of psychiatric and emotional support service animals provide documentation and advance notice of their planned travel with a service animal. An advocacy group representing users of psychiatric service dogs has filed a petition for rulemaking stating that the notice and medical documentation requirements stigmatize and discriminate against people with mental disabilities, and asking that it be repealed.

Legal Basis: This legal basis for the proposed rule is the Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA), which prohibits discrimination in airline service on the basis of disability.

Alternatives: Regulatory alternatives will be developed and the public will be afforded an opportunity to provide comments when the Department publishes the proposed rule in the Federal Register.

Costs and Benefits: Estimates of costs and benefits are under development.

Risks: N/A

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Supplemental NPRM 06/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: NoSmall Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Split From 2105- AD96 Agency Contact: Blane A Workie Attorney Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-9342
TDD Phone: 202 755-7687
FAX: 202 366-7152
E -Mail: blane.workie@ost.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Office of the Secretary ( OST ) RIN: 2105-AE24

View Related Documents

Title: Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs: Revision of Substance Abuse Professional Credential Requirement

Abstract: This rulemaking would add drug and alcohol counselors certified by the National Association of Forensic Counselors (NAFC), specifically the Master Addictions Counselor (MAC), Certified Chemical Dependency Counselor (CCDC), and Certified Additions Specialist (CFAS), to the list of credentialed professionals eligible to serve as substance abuse professionals (SAPs) under subpart O of 49 CFR part 40. The intended effect of this proposed rule is to expand the list of credentials in 49 CFR part 40.281 to include the MAC, CCDC, and CFAS certified by the NAFC as an acceptable credential to become a SAP in the Department of Transportation's (DOT) drug and alcohol testing program.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 40 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 102, 301, 322, 5331, 20140, 31306, and 45101 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Anne Bechdolt Attorney Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-4723
E-Mail: anne.bechdolt@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Office of the Secretary ( OST ) RIN: 2105-AD59

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Sensitive Security Information

Abstract: This rulemaking would finalize a May 2004 interim final rule and respond to any comments received on that action. This is a joint rulemaking between DOT and the Transportation Security Administration. A final rule was originally scheduled for
10/31/06.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final RuleMajor: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 15; 49 CFR 1520 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 46 USC 70102 to 70106; 49 USC 114; 49 USC 44913 to 44914; 49 USC 44942; 49 USC 44901 to 44907; 49 USC 5103; 49 USC 46105; 49 USC 44916 to 44918; 49 USC 44935 to 44936 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 05/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Mohsin Syed Attorney Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-9609
E-Mail: mohsin.syed@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Office of the Secretary ( OST ) RIN: 2105-AD91

View Related Documents

Title: Accessibility of Airports

Abstract: This rulemaking would include new provisions related to service animal relief areas and closed captioning of televisions and audio-visual displays for airports that mirror the new requirements applicable to airlines set forth in the amended 14 CFR part 382. It would also reorganize the provision in 49 CFR part 27 regarding lifts used to transfer disabled passengers
to and from the tarmac.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 27 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/29/2011 76 FR 60426

NPRM Comment Period End 11/28/2011

Final Rule 05/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Blane A Workie Attorney Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-9342
TDD Phone: 202 755-7687
FAX: 202 366-7152
E -Mail: blane.workie@ost.dot.govDepartment of Transportation (DOT) Office of the Secretary ( OST ) RIN: 2105-AE06

View Related Documents

Title: Smoking of Electronic Cigarettes On Commercial Aircraft

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the general regulatory language in 14 CFR part 252 to explicitly ban the smoking of electronic cigarettes on air carrier and foreign air carrier flights in scheduled intrastate, interstate, and foreign air transportation.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 252 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: PL 101–164; 49 USC 40102; 49 USC 40109; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 41701; 49 USC 41702; 49 USC 41706, as amended by sec 708 of PL 106–181; 49 USC 41711; 49 USC 46301 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/15/2011 76 FR 57008

NPRM Comment Period End 11/14/2011

Final Rule 05/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Blane A Workie Attorney Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-9342
TDD Phone: 202 755-7687
FAX: 202 366-7152
E -Mail: blane.workie@ost.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Office of the Secretary ( OST ) RIN: 2105-AE07

View Related Documents

Title: Incidents Involving Death, Loss, or Injury of Animals

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the existing reporting requirements in 14 CFR 234.13 concerning the loss, injury, or death of an animal during air transport. Under the existing rule, "animal" means any warm or cold blooded animal which, at the time of transportation, is being kept as a pet in a family household in the United States. This rulemaking would expand the definition of animal to also include all cats and dogs transported by an air carrier, regardless of whether or not it is a kept as apet in a family household. In addition, the existing rule applies to air carrier that account for 1% or more of domestic scheduledservice passenger revenues. The rulemaking would expand this to all US carriers that operate scheduled service with at least one aircraft with a design capacity of more than 60 seats.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 234.13 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 41721 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/29/2012 77 FR 38747

NPRM Comment Period End 08/28/2012

NPRM Comment Period Extended 09/04/2012 77 FR 53779

Final Rule 06/00/2014Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2105- AD48; Related to 2120- AH55; Related to 2120- AH69 Agency Contact: Blane A Workie Attorney Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-9342
TDD Phone: 202 755-7687
FAX: 202 366-7152
E -Mail: blane.workie@ost.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Office of the Secretary ( OST ) RIN: 2105-AE15

View Related Documents

Title: Transportation for Individuals With Disabilities: Reasonable Modification

Abstract: This action would continue a rulemaking initiated under RIN 2105-AD54. It would add to the Department ́s ADA regulations a requirement, parallel to that in other DOT and Department of Justice ADA rules, that regulated entities reasonably modify policies and practices where necessary to ensure nondiscriminatory transportation services for individuals with disabilities, except where doing so would fundamentally alter the service.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 27; 49 CFR 37 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 12101 to 12235; 49 USC 322 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 04/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Jill Laptosky Attorney Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-4723
E-Mail: jill.laptosky@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Office of the Secretary ( OST ) RIN: 2105-AE25

View Related Documents

Title: Miscellaneous Amendments; Transportation for Individuals with Disabilities (RRR)

Abstract: This final rule amends the guidance found in both appendix D to part 37 and the Appendix to part 38 by removing obsolete and inconsistent language. Specifically, guidance language found in the appendix to part 38 concerning public address systems has become outdated. In addition, a final rule published on May 21, 1996, which amended portions of 49 CFR part 37 concerning equivalent facilitation determinations, inadvertently failed to update language found in appendix D to that part.Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 37; 49 CFR 38 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Additional Information: SB - No; IC - No; SLT - No.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Jill Laptosky Attorney Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-4723
E-Mail: jill.laptosky@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Office of the Secretary ( OST ) RIN: 2105-AE08

View Related Documents

Title: Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE Program Improvements, Phase 2) (RRR)

Abstract: This NPRM would propose changes to the DBE rule in such areas as application and personal net worth forms, transit vehicle manufacturers, and certification standards and procedures.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 23; 49 CFR 26 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 47107; 42 USC 2000d; 49 USC 322; EO 12138; 23 USC 324; 49 USC 47107, 49 USC 47113; 49 USC 1615; 49 USC 47123; 42 USC 2000d et seq; PL 105–178, sec 1101(b),112 stat 107, 113 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined

Additional Information: SB - Y IC - N SLT - Y This item covers both OST items on the August RRR plan. The rule is expected to streamline and clarify regulations, which should ease compliance burdens, but there are no current quantified benefits.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: JoAnne Robinson Attorney Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-6984
E-Mail: joanne.robinson@dot.govDepartment of Transportation (DOT) Office of the Secretary ( OST ) RIN: 2105-AE23

View Related Documents

Title: Transportation for Individuals with Disabilities: Passenger Vessel Accessibility Standards

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the Department ́s rules implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by adopting as its standards revised accessibility guidelines proposed by the Access Board with regard to passenger vessels. The Americans with Disabilities Act requires that our standards be consistent with the minimum guidelines set by the Access Board.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 39 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 12149 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 3014- AA11 Agency Contact: Jill Laptosky Attorney Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-4723
E-Mail: jill.laptosky@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Office of the Secretary ( OST ) RIN: 2105-AD87

View Related Documents

Title: Use of the Seat-Strapping Method for Carrying a Wheelchair on an Aircraft

Abstract: This rulemaking would address whether carriers should be allowed to utilize the seat-strapping method to stow a passenger ́s wheelchair in the aircraft cabin.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 382 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 41705 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/03/2011 76 FR 32107

NPRM Comment Period End 08/02/2011

Final Rule 11/12/2013 78 FR 67918

Final Action Effective 01/13/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Blane A WorkieAttorney Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-9342
TDD Phone: 202 755-7687
FAX: 202 366-7152
E -Mail: blane.workie@ost.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Office of the Secretary ( OST ) RIN: 2105-AD96

View Related Documents

Title: Accessibility of Carrier Websites and Ticket Kiosks

Abstract: This is the first of two rulemakings to follow-up on air travel accessibility issues discussed in the preamble of the 2008 final Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA) rule but deferred for final decision to a later rulemaking. (The second rulemaking is RIN 2105-AE12.) This rulemaking action would consider disability-based accessibility requirements for Web sites and automated
kiosks used for air travel.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 382 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 41702; 49 USC 47105; 49 USC 41712 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rulemaking proposes to provide greater accommodations for individuals with disabilities in accessing automated kiosks at U.S. airports and websites operated by U.S. and foreign air carriers and their ticket agents. Automated kiosks are widely used by U.S. and foreign air carriers at airports to provide customer services (e.g., boarding pass and bag tag printing). Also, today's passengers increasingly rely on air travel websites for information about airline services, making reservations, and obtaining discounted airfares. Currently, neither airlines nor airports are required to make airport kiosks accessible to passengers with disabilities. Also, not all air travel information and services available to the public on websites are accessible to people with disabilities. Only DOT can protect air travelers with disabilities as States are preempted from regulating in these areas and no private right of action exists for airline consumers to enforce the Air Carrier Access Act.

Legal Basis: The legal basis for the proposed rule is the Air Carrier Access Act which prohibits discrimination in airline service on the basis of disability, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 which requires accessibility in airport terminal
facilities that receive Federal financial assistance.

Alternatives: Since May 2008, the Department has attempted to address the problem of inaccessible websites by requiring U.S. and foreign air carriers to make discounted, web-based fares and amenities available to passengers who self-identify as being unable to use an airline's inaccessible website due to their disability. The Department has also tried to address the problem of inaccessible kiosks by requiring U.S. and foreign air carriers to make equivalent service available to passengers with a disability who cannot readily use a carrier's automated kiosk due to their disability. Disability advocacy groups have repeatedly expressed opposition to these interim solutions as they do not enable them to independently access and use
airlines' websites or kiosks.

Costs and Benefits: Preliminary estimates show that the present value of net benefits of the requirement to ensure the accessibility of automated airport kiosks to be $113 million over the 10-year period from 2013 through 2022, using a 7 percent discount rate. With respect to the proposed requirements to ensure air travel website accessibility, our preliminary regulatory evaluation estimates the expected present value of net benefits at $123 million over the period from 2013 through 2022, using the 7 percent discount rate.

Risks: N/A

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

SNPRM: Extension of Comment Period & Clarification of Proposed
Rule 11/21/2011 76 FR 71914

SNPRM Comment Period End 11/25/2011
Supplemental NPRM 11/26/2011 76 FR 59307

SNPRM: Extended Comment Period End 01/09/2012

Final Rule 11/12/2013 78 FR 67882

Final Rule Effective 11/12/2013Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2105- AE12 Agency Contact: Blane A Workie Attorney Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-9342
TDD Phone: 202 755-7687
FAX: 202 366-7152
E -Mail: blane.workie@ost.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Office of the Secretary ( OST ) RIN: 2105-AE22

View Related Documents

Title: Advisory Committees (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would remove DOT ́s advisory committee regulations at 49 CFR part 95. Part 95 has substantively remained unchanged since its early amendment in 1968. It has since been made obsolete by other laws, regulations, and agency procedures.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 95 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 5 USC, app 2
Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 08/08/2013 78 FR 48334

Final Rule Effective 08/08/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Jill Laptosky Attorney Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-4723
E-Mail: jill.laptosky@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK09

View Related Documents

Title: Drug and Alcohol Testing of Certain Maintenance Provider Employees Located Outside of the United States

Abstract: This rulemaking is required by the FAA Modernization and Reauthorization Act of 2012. It would require controlled substance testing of some employees working in repair stations located outside the United States. The intended effect is to increase participation by companies outside of the United States in testing of employees who perform safety critical functions and testing standards similar to those used in the repair stations located in the United States. This action is necessary to increase the level of safety of the flying public.Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 145 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 14 CFR; 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44707; 49 USC 44709; 49
USC 44717 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory NPRM 02/14/2013

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: As a project identified under congressional mandate, the intended effect of this rulemaking would be to promote drug and alcohol testing standardization within the global aviation community in an effort to reach an increased level of safety for the flying public, around the world.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 12/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business;
Governmental Jurisdictions Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Vicky Dunne Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202 267-8522
E-Mail: vicky.dunne@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AA66

View Related Documents

Title: Airspace Actions

Abstract: This rulemaking would ensure the safe and efficient use of the National Airspace System and accommodate Department of Defense operations. Rulemaking airspace actions are used to designate, modify, or revoke airways, routes, terminal airspace, and special use airspace (SUA) within the United States and its territories. The vast majority of airspace actions are routine and frequent. 10/00/2013--10/00/2014

Priority: Routine and Frequent Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 71; 14 CFR 73 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40103; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40120; EO 10854 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Actions Will Continue Through 10/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: NoEnergy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Gary Norek Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202 267-9239
E-Mail: gary.a.norek@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ33

View Related Documents

Title: Air Carrier Contract Maintenance Requirements

Abstract: This rulemaking would establish requirements for carriers to include specific guidance in their maintenance manuals to ensure that all outsourced maintenance is performed in accordance with a carriers’ own maintenance program.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 121; 14 CFR 135 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 1153; 49 USC 40101 to 40103; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 41721; 49 USC 44105; 49 USC 44106; 49 USC 44111; 49 USC 44701 to 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC 44901; 49 USC 44903; 49 USC 44904; 49 USC 44906; 49 USC 44912; 49 USC 44914; 49 USC 44936; 49 USC 44938; 49 USC 45101 to 45105; 49 USC 46103; 49 USC

46105 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Any person performing maintenance for an air carrier must follow the carrier's maintenance program as outlined in its maintenance manual. However, maintenance manuals are often geared for in-house maintenance and do not contain sufficient instructions for contract providers. This rulemaking is part of the FAA's effort, in response to DOT Inspector General's report, to maintain aviation safety by ensuring proper guidance and training for contract providers, and oversight of that maintenance by both air carriers and the FAA.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/13/2012 77 FR 67584

NPRM Comment Period End 02/11/2013

Comment Period Extended 02/12/2013 78 FR 9865

Comment Period Extension End 03/13/2013
Analyzing Comments 11/00/2013

Additional Information: This proposed rule would assist the FAA in its oversight responsibilities and ensure consistency between contract and in-house air carrier maintenance. Over 10 years, the cost to par 121 and part 135 air carriers and the FAA would be approximately $2.4 million ($1.6 million, present value at 7%). The FAA believes these benefits have value exceeding the costs.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Debra Catron Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 950 L'Enfant Plaza North, SE, Washington, DC 20024 Washington , DC 20024
Phone: 202-385- 6446
E-Mail: debra.j.catron@faa.govDepartment of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ38

View Related Documents

Title: Airport Safety Management System

Abstract: This rulemaking would require airport operators to institute a safety management system at their airports. This action is necessary to improve safety through conformance with best practices in risk management and promote international harmonization with ICAO standards. The rule is intended to facilitate integration of formal risk management processes within the airport ́s day-to-day operations.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 139 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 44706 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final rule 11/05/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: In 2001, ICAO adopted a standard in Annex 14 that all member States establish SMS requirements for airport operators. The FAA supports conformity of U.S. aviation safety regulations with ICAO standards and recommended practices. The Agency intends to meet the intent of the ICAO standard in a way that complements existing airport safety regulations in 14 CFR part 139.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/07/2010 75 FR 62008

NPRM Comment Period Extended 12/10/2010 75 FR 76928

NPRM Comment Period End 01/05/2011

End of Extended Comment Period 03/07/2011

Second Extension of Comment Period 03/07/2011 76 FR 12300

End of Second Extended Comment Period 07/05/2011
Supplemental NPRM 04/00/2014

Additional Information: Benefits: $143 million/Costs $150 -226 million. This information is preliminary and subject to significant changes in the final rule that will change the cost and benefit calculations.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2120- AJ15 Agency Contact: Michael Brown Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202 267-7653
E-Mail: michael.w.brown@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ60

View Related DocumentsTitle: Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS)

Abstract: This rulemaking would adopt specific rules for the operation of small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS) in the national airspace system. These changes would address the classification of small unmanned aircraft, certification of their pilots and visual observers, registration, approval of operations, and operational limits in order to increase the safety and efficiency of the national airspace system. The rulemaking would result in regular collection of safety data from the user community and aid the FAA in assessing effectiveness of regulations to expand sUAS access to the national airspace system.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 91 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 44701; PL 112-95 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Public Law 112 -95, section 332(b) requires issuance of final rule 18 months after integration plan is submitted to Congress. Integration plan due Feb. 14, 2013. 08/14/2014

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The FAA is proposing to amend its regulations to adopt specific rules for the operation of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) in the National Airspace System (NAS). These changes would address the classification of sUAS, certification of sUAS pilots and visual observers, registration of sUAS, approval of sUAS operations, and sUAS operational limits. The NPRM also proposes regulations for all sUAS, including operating standards for model aircraft and low performance (e.g., toy) operations, to increase safety and efficiency of the NAS. The FAA and sUAS community lack sufficient formal safety data regarding unmanned operations to support granting traditional, routine access to the NAS. This proposed rule would result in the regular collection of safety data from the user community and help the FAA develop new regulations and expand sUAS access to the NAS.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2014

Additional Information: Total estimated costs are $168.7M PV. Total estimated benefits are 342.8M PV (based on May 4, 2012 reg eval draft).

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business;
Governmental Jurisdictions Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Stephen A Glowacki Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202-385- 4898
E-Mail: stephen.a.glowacki@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ87

View Related Documents

Title: Flight Crewmember Mentoring, Leadership, and Professional Development (HR 5900)

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the regulations for air carrier training programs under part 121. The action is necessary to ensure that air carriers establish or modify training programs that address mentoring, leadership, and professional development of flight crewmembers in part 121 operations. The amendments are intended to contribute significantly to airline safety by reducing aviation accidents and respond to the mandate in Public Law 111-216.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed RuleMajor: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 121 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 44701(a)(5); PL 111-216, sec 206 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory NPRM 07/29/2011

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The FAA proposes to amend its regulations pertaining to part 121 air carrier training programs. This proposal would require air carriers to: (1) establish flightcrew member mentoring programs for new-hire pilots and pilots upgrading or transitioning to a pilot in command position; (2) establish a professional development steering committee; (3) establish or modify pilot indoctrination training to accommodate substantially different levels and types of flight experience; (4) establish or modify initial second-in-command upgrade training to include leadership and command training and instruction on compliance with the sterile cockpit rule; and (5) include leadership and command training in pilots’ recurrent training. This proposal would also establish minimum qualification requirements for Directors of Safety and assign to that position responsibility for the flightcrew member mentoring programs. The proposed amendments would ensure that pilots have the resources and skills necessary to act as leaders and exercise command in the cockpit.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2120- AJ00 Agency Contact: Deke Abbott Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202 267-8266
E-Mail: deke.abbott@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ89

View Related Documents

Title: Slot Management and Transparency for LaGuardia Airport, John F. Kennedy International Airport, and Newark Liberty International Airport

Abstract: This rulemaking would replace the current temporary orders limiting scheduled operations at LaGuardia Airport, John F. Kennedy International Airport, and Newark Liberty International Airport with a more permanent rule to address the issues of congestion and delay at the New York area ́s three major commercial airports, while also promoting fair access and competition. The rulemaking would help ensure that congestion and delays are managed by limiting scheduled and unscheduled operations. The rulemaking would also establish a secondary market for U.S. and foreign air carriers to buy, sell, trade, and lease slots amongst each other at each of the three airports. This would allow carriers serving or seeking to serve the New York area airports to exchange slots as their business models and strategic goals require.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 93 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40103; 49 USC 40106; 49 USC 40109; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 44502; 49 USC 44514; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44719; 49 USC 46301 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:Statement of Need: This rulemaking would replace the current temporary orders limiting scheduled operations at LaGuardia Airport, John F. Kennedy International Airport, and Newark Liberty International Airport with a more permanent rule to address the issues of congestion and delay at the New York area’s three major commercial airports, while also promoting fair access and competition. The rulemaking would help ensure that congestion and delays are managed by limiting scheduled and unscheduled operations. The rulemaking would also establish a secondary market for U.S. and foreign air carriers to buy, sell, trade, and lease slots amongst each other at each of the three airports. This would allow carriers serving or seeking to serve the New York area airports to exchange slots as their business models and strategic goals require.

Legal Basis: This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart I, sections 40101, 40103, 40105, and 41712. The Secretary of Transportation (Secretary) is the head of the DOT and has broad oversight of significant FAA decisions. See 49 U.S.C. 102 and 106. In addition, under 49 U.S.C. 41712, the Secretary has the authority to investigate and prohibit unfair and deceptive practices and unfair methods of competition in air transportation or the sale of air transportation. The FAA has broad authority under 49 U.S.C. 40103 to regulate the use of the navigable airspace of the United States. This section authorizes the FAA to develop plans and policy for the use of navigable airspace and to assign the use the FAA deems necessary for safe and efficient utilization. It further directs the FAA to prescribe air traffic rules and regulations governing the efficient utilization of navigable airspace. Not only is the FAA required to ensure the efficient use of navigable airspace, but it must do so in a manner that does not effectively shut out potential operators at the airport and in a manner that acknowledges competitive market forces. These authorities empower the DOT to ensure the efficient utilization of airspace by limiting the number of scheduled and unscheduled aircraft operations at JFK, EWR, and LGA, while balancing between promoting competition and recognizing historical investments in the airport and the need to provide continuity. They also authorize the DOT to investigate the transfer of slots and to limit or prohibit anticompetitive transfers.

Alternatives: The FAA considered two alternatives. The first alternative was to simply extend the existing orders. This alternative was rejected because the FAA wanted to increase competition by making slots available to more operators. The FAA believes these operators are likely to be small entities. The second alternative was to remove the existing orders. This alternative results in unacceptable delay costs from the increase in operations.

Costs and Benefits: Total benefits and costs are estimated at $74,696,596 ($65,242,900 Present Value at 7 percent) for benefits and $53,056,768 ($46,341,836 Present Value at 7 percent) for costs. This is a preliminary estimate that is subject to change based on further review and analysis.

Risks: There are no risks for this rulemaking.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Additional Information: This rulemaking is associated with an RRR action.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Molly W Smith

Federal Aviation Administration Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202 267-3344
E-Mail: molly.w.smith@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ90

View Related Documents

Title: Effective Tether System (Tether Rule) (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would exclude tethered launches from the licensing requirements of 14 CFR chapter III. This rulemaking is necessary to maintain public safety for these launches by providing launch vehicle operators with clear and simple criteria for a safe tethered launch. For tethered launches that satisfy the design and operational criteria, the FAA would not require a license, permit, or waiver. This action is intended to impose no additional requirements on operators, but provides an alternative to conducting a tethered launches.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: NoCFR Citation: 14 CFR 400; 14 CFR 401 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 44701 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Tethered launches are test launches, involving vehicles restrained by a tether attached to a crane or fork lift, that prevent the vehicle from hitting the ground. In 2008, the FAA determined that some of these launches meet the applicability criteria of 14 CFR chapter III, section 400.2, and that operators must apply for a license, permit, or waiver. That year, the FAA granted 5 such waivers, and the agency now seeks an approach to tethered launches that would maintain public safety and be less burdensome on launch operators and the FAA.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/23/2012 77 FR 50956

NPRM Comment Period End 10/22/2012
Supplemental NPRM 05/00/2014

Additional Information: SB: Y; IC: N; SLT: N Cost and Benefits: This action will likely result in cost savings for the FAA and cost savings or minimal impact for launch operators. This action would relieve operators from the process and financial burdens of applying for waivers, licenses, and permits. It could save the FAA time and resources required to analyze these applications. The rulemaking would impose no additional requirements on operators, but provides an alternative to conducting the tethered launch under Chapter III. Tethered launches that use toxic propellants would not be eligible for exclusion. Status: FAA drafting
SNPRM.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Shirley McBride Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington , DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202-267- 7470
E-Mail: shirley.mcbride@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ94

View Related Documents

Title: Enhanced Flight Vision System (EFVS) (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would permit operators to use an EFVS in lieu of natural vision to continue descending from 100 feet height above runway touchdown zone elevation to the runway and land on certain straight-in instrument approach procedures under instrument flight rules. This action would also permit certain operators using EFVS-equipped aircraft to dispatch, release, or takeoff under instrument flight rules (IFR), and to initiate and continue an approach when the destination airport weather is below authorized visibility minimums for the runway of intended landing. Pilot training, recent flight experience, and proficiency would be required for operators who use EFVS in lieu of natural vision to descend below decision altitude, decision height, or minimum descent altitude. The FAA believes that an EFVS can provide operational and safety benefits during Category II and Category III approach operations. The rulemaking would enable expanded EFVS operations, which would increase access and efficiency in low visibility conditions, and potentially result in fewer missed approaches and delayed take-offs.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 1; 14 CFR 121; 14 CFR 125; 14 CFR 135; 14 CFR 61; 14 CFR 91 (To search for a specific CFR, visit

the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 1155; 49 USC 40103; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40119; 49 USC 40120; 49 USC 41706; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44111; 49 USC 44701 to 44703; 49 USC 44704; 49 USC 44705; 49 USC 44707; 49 USC 44709 to 44711; 49 USC 44712; 49 USC 44713; 49 USC 44715; 49 USC 44716; 49 USC 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC45101 to 45105; 49 USC 45102; 49 USC 45103; 49 USC 45301; 49 USC 45302; 49 USC 46105; 49 USC 46306; 49 USC 46315; 49 USC 46316; 49 USC 46504; 49 USC 46506; 49 USC 46507; 49 USC 47122; 49 USC 47508; 49 USC 47528 to

47531 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Under current regulations, the EFVS can only be used for operational benefit in that portion of the visual segment of an approach that extends from decision Altitude (DA) Decision Height (DH) or Minimum Descent Altitude (MDA) down to 100 feet above the runway touchdown zone elevation or runway threshold elevation. The proposed rule would permit operators to use EFVS below 100 feet to touchdown and rollout. Additionally, the proposed rule would also permit certain operators using EFVS-equipped aircraft to dispatch, release, or takeoff under instrument flight rules (IFR), and to initiate and continue an approach when the destination airport weather is below authorized visibility minimums for the runway of intended landed. The proposed rule would also accommodate the installation and approval of an EFVS and other vision systems, such as enhanced vision system, synthetic vision system, and combined vision system using a transparent display surface (e.g., a head-up-display (HUD) or the equivalent).

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/11/2013 78 FR 34935

NPRM Comment Period Extended 09/06/2013 78 FR 54790

NPRM Comment Period End 09/09/2013

NPRM Extended Comment Period End 10/15/2013
Analyzing Comments 01/00/2014

Additional Information: SB: N IC: N SLT: N

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2120- AH78 Agency Contact: Terry King Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 470 L'Enfant Plaza, SW, Washington, DC 20024 Washington , DC 20024
Phone: 202-385- 4588
FAX: 202-385- 4653
E-Mail: Terry.king@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ95

View Related Documents

Title: Exiting Icing

Abstract: This rulemaking would establish standards for when flightcrews need to take action to exit icing conditions. If adopted, this rulemaking would apply to aircraft with a maximum takeoff weight of less than 60,000 pounds. This rulemaking is based on recommendations from an Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee working group after reviewing certain accidents and incidents. The intended affect of this action is to avoid similar accidents and incidents in the future. This rulemaking replaces RIN 2120-AJ74, for which an NPRM had originally been scheduled for 11/02/2011. This rulemaking has expanded the scope of RIN 2120-AJ74 to include requirements for design approval holders.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 121 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40119; 49 USC 41706; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44705; 49 USC 44709; 49 USC 44710; 49 USC 44711; 49 USC 44713; 49 USC 44716; 49 USC 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC 46105Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This proposal is needed to respond to recommendations from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) (A-96-56) and the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC), and to improve the level of safety for certain airplanes when operated in icing conditions.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/00/2014

Additional Information: Includes Retrospective Review under Executive Order 13563

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2120- AJ74 Agency Contact: Robert Hettman

ANM- 112, Transport Airplane Directorate Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98057 Renton , WA 98057
Phone: 425-227- 2683
E-Mail: robert.hettman@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK06

View Related Documents

Title: Public Risk Criteria for Launch and Reentry (Risk Rule)

Abstract: This rulemaking would revise the requirements to: 1) establish quantitative public risk acceptability criteria that treat launch and reentry separately; 2) define the scope of launch and reentry mission for the purposes of quantitative risk analyses (QRA); and 3) apply QRA requirements, including uncertainty analysis, equally to all types of launch and reentry vehicles. These revisions would update the current requirements and are consistent with current practices at the Federal ranges.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 417; 14 CFR 431; 14 CFR 435 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 51 USC 50901 to 50923 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The FAA currently requires a launch operator to establish/implement ship and aircraft "hazard areas that provide an equivalent level of safety to that provided by [ship and] aircraft hazard areas implemented for launch from a Federal launch range." Section 417.107(b)(3)&(4). This regulatory text incorporates by reference the level of safety that was provided by hazard areas for launches from a Federal launch range at the time that the final rule was issued. The lowest level of safety that satisfies these criteria is a probability of impact (Pi) limit of 1E-6. This rule proposes to simplify the regulatory requirements in section 417.107(b)(3) and (4) by deleting the reference to an "equivalent level of safety" and simply stating that the pertinent criteria for establishing hazard areas is Pi = 1E-6.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Rene Rey Licensing and Safety Division, Office of Commercial Space Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 385-4805

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK08

View Related Documents

Title: Flight Simulation Training Device (FSTD) Qualification Standards for Extended Envelope and Adverse Weather Event Training

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend evaluation qualifications for simulators to ensure the simulators are technically capable of performing new flight training tasks as identified in the Airline Safety and Federal Aviation Administration Extension Act of 2010 (PL 111-216) and that are included in a separate rulemaking (2120-AJ00). By ensuring the simulators provide an accurate and realistic simulation, this rulemaking would allow for training on the following tasks: (1) full/aerodynamic stall, and (2) upset recognition and recovery, as identified in PL 111-216. Furthermore, this rulemaking would improve the minimum FSTD evaluation requirements for gusting crosswinds (takeoff/landing), engine and airframe icing, and bounced landing recovery methods in response to NTSB and Aviation Rulemaking Committee recommendations. The intended effect is to ensure an adequate level of simulator fidelity.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 44701; PL 111-216 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Many existing FSTDs used by air carriers to conduct training may not adequately represent the simulated aircraft to a degree necessary for successful completion of required training tasks. Additionally, the FAA evaluated several recent air carrier accidents and determined that low FSTD fidelity or the lack of ability for an FTSD to adequately conduct certain training tasks may have been a contributing factor in these accidents. A potential lack of simulator fidelity could contribute to inappropriate or incomplete training on new training tasks that will be required by the Crewmember and Dispatcher Training rulemaking , which could lead to an associated and unnecessary safety risk.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.govRelated RINs: Related to 2120-AJ00 Agency Contact: Larry McDonald Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration PO Box 20636, Atlanta, GA 30320 Atlanta , GA 30320
Phone: 404-474- 5620
E-Mail: larry.e.mcdonald@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK12

View Related Documents

Title: Harmonization of Airworthiness Standards-Gust and Maneuver Load Requirements

Abstract: This rulemaking would revise the manufacturing design requirements for transport category aircraft; specifically, the design criteria for calculating gust and maneuver loads, as well as engine failure loads. The revisions would allow for the determination of the appropriate gust loads during the design phase of the aircraft to account for the effects of new flight control systems, and the increased weights and sizes of modern aircraft and engines. These requirements would be consistent with current requirements already imposed on manufacturers seeking aircraft certification through EASA. These revisions are further supported by FAA ́s Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee, which was tasked with reviewing and suggesting areas to eliminate differences between EASA and FAA transport category aircraft certification standards. Thus, this rulemaking would benefit manufacturers who would only need to consider one single set of certification requirements in designing transport category aircraft.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 25 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44704 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rulemaking would update loads requirements used for structural design of the airplane. This rulemaking would revise the pitch maneuver design loads criteria; revise the gust and turbulence design loads criteria; revise the application of gust loads to engine mounts, high lift devices, and other control surfaces; add a “round-the-clock” discrete gust criterion and a multi-axis discrete gust criterion for airplanes equipped with wing-mounted engines; revise the engine torque loads criteria; add an engine failure dynamic load condition; revise the ground gust design loads criteria; revise the criteria used to establish the rough air design speed; and require the establishment of a rough air Mach number.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/28/2013 78 FR 31851

Correction 06/24/2013 78 FR 37722

Correction 07/15/2013 78 FR 42480

NPRM Comment Period End 08/26/2013
Analyzing Comments 12/00/2013

Additional Information: No costs are associated with this action because all manufacturers of transport category airplanes, certified under part 25, are expected to continue their current practice of compliances under both part 25 and EASA's CS-25. Since this rule simply adopts the same requirements as CS-25, FAA estimates that manufacturers would not incur additional costs resulting from this action. They may receive cost savings because they will not have to build and certificate transport category airplanes to two different certification standards.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.govAgency Contact: Todd Martin Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave, SW, Renton, WA 98057 Renton , WA 98057
Phone: 425 227-1178
FAX: 425 227-1232
E -Mail: todd.martin@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK13

View Related Documents

Title: Harmonization of Airworthiness Standards--Miscellaneous Structures Requirements

Abstract: This rulemaking would harmonize regulatory differences, where appropriate and justified, between the airworthiness standards of the FAA and European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) by revising the structural test requirements necessarywhen analysis has not been found reliable; clarifying the quality control, inspection, and testing requirements for critical and noncritical castings; adding control system requirements that consider structural deflection and vibration loads; expanding the fuel tank structural and system requirements regarding emergency landing conditions and landing gear failure conditions; adding a requirement that engine mount failure due to overload must not cause hazardous fuel spillage; and revising the inertial forces requirements for cargo compartments by removing the exclusion of compartments located below or forward of all occupants in the airplane. This action is based on recommendations from the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC). The intended effect is for future certificated transport airplanes to meet one single set of requirements.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 25 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 14 USC 106(g); 14 USC 40113; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44704 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rulemaking is needed because of differences between the regulations of the FAA and foreign certification authorities increase the cost and complexity of certification without contributing significantly to safety. This rulemaking results from an agreement between the European Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA), the predecessor to EASA, and the FAA to harmonize certain existing rules, which would benefit manufacturers who would only need to consider one single set of certification requirements. Wording is also simplified to clarify the rules and prevent misinterpretation.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/01/2013 78 FR 13835

NPRM Comment Period End 05/30/2013
Analyzing Comments 12/00/2013

Additional Information: No costs are associated with this proposed rule because all manufacturers of transport category airplanes, certified under part 25, are expected to continue their current practice of compliance under both part 25 and EASA’s CS-25. Since this rule simply adopts the same requirements as CS-25, FAA estimates that manufacturers would not incur additional costs resulting from this rule. They may in fact receive cost-savings because they will not have to build and certificate transport category airplanes to two different authorities’ certification specifications, paperwork requirements, and rules.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Todd Martin Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration1601 Lind Ave, SW, Renton, WA 98057 Renton , WA 98057
Phone: 425 227-1178
FAX: 425 227-1232
E -Mail: todd.martin@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK17

View Related Documents

Title: Disclosure of Seat Dimensions to Facilitate the Use of Child Restraint Systems on Aircraft (FAA Reauthorization)

Abstract: This rulemaking would require each air carrier operating under part 121 to post on the Internet website of the air carrier the maximum dimensions of a child restraint system that can be used on each aircraft operated by the air carrier. Section 412 of PL 112-95 directs the FAA to initiate a rulemaking not later than 1 year after the date of enactment (February 14, 2013).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 121 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40119; 49 USC 41706; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44705; 49 USC 44709 to 44711; 49 USC 44713; 49 USC 44716; 49 USC 44717; 49 USC 44722; PL 112-95 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory Initiation date 02/14/2013

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-95) was enacted on February 14, 2012. Section 412 of the Act, Disclosure of Seat Dimensions to Facilitate the Use of Child Safety Seats on Aircraft, requires the FAA "...to require each air carrier operating under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, to post on the Internet website of the air carrier the maximum dimensions of a child safety seat that can be used on each aircraft operated by the air carrier to enable passengers to determine which child safety seats can be used on those aircraft." Section 412 directs the FAA to initiate a rulemaking not later than 1 year after the date of enactment (February 14, 2013).

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/00/2014

Additional Information: The economic impact of this regulation is undetermined at this time.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Catherine Burnett Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202-493- 5575
E-Mail: catherine.burnett@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK20

View Related Documents

Title: Production and Airworthiness Certification IIAbstract: This rulemaking would revise requirements for certificating aeronautical products and articles. These changes are intended to address deficiencies in oversight of supplier facilities; allow manufacture of certain airframe components by engine manufacturers; add a requirement that an accountable person be named for certain production approval holders; and add a minor change to marking requirements for certain wood propellers. This rulemaking replaces RIN 2120-AK04.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 21 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7572; 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40105; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44704; 49 USC 44707; 49 USC 44709; 49 USC 44711; 49 USC 44713; 49 USC 44715; 49 USC 45303 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The production approval holder (PAH) and the PAH supplier structure have changed to a point where suppliers are currently manufacturing larger and more critical components than ever before. For example, wings and fuselage of an aircraft are being manufactured by PAHs. In addition, sub-tier suppliers, which are suppliers that contract to other suppliers, are also manufacturing increasingly critical structures and components. This rulemaking would clarify the regulations by stating that the PAH is responsible for its suppliers throughout its supply chain.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2014

Additional Information:

.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2120- AJ44; Previously Reported as

2120- AK04 Agency Contact: Priscilla Steward Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 950 L'Enfant Plaza North, SW, Washington, DC 20024 Washington , DC 20024
Phone: 202 000-0000 Agency Contact: Judine Slaughter Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202 493-4698
E-Mail: judine.slaughter@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK22

View Related Documents

Title: Prohibition of Tail End Ferry in Part 121 (Reauthorization)

Abstract: This rulemaking would require a flightcrew member who accepts an additional assignment for flying under part 91 from the air carrier or from any other air carrier conducting operations under part 121 or 135 of such title, to apply the period of the additional assignment toward any limitation applicable to the flightcrew member relating to duty periods or flight times. This rule is necessary as it will make part 121 flight, duty, and rest limits applicable to tail-end ferries that follow an all-cargo flight.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 119; 14 CFR 121 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40119; 49 USC 41706; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44705; 49 USC 44709 to 44711; 49 USC 44713; 49 USC 44716; 49 USC 44717 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory Initiation date 08/14/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Section 345 of the FAA Modernization and reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112-95, directs the FAA to initiate a rulemaking "to require a flight crewmember who is employed by an air carrier conducting operations under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, and who accepts an additional assignment for flying under part 91 of such title * * * to apply the period of the additional assignment * * * toward any limitation applicable to the flight crewmember relating to duty periods or flight times under part 121." In addition, the National Transportation Safety Board has recommended that the FAA revise its regulations to "prohibit air carriers from assigning flightcrews to flights conducted under 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 91 unless the flightcrews meet the flight and duty time limitations of 14 CFR part 121 or other appropriate regulations."

Legal Basis: Section 345 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Duty Periods and Flight Time Limitations Applicable to Flight Crewmembers, directs the FAA to initiate a rulemaking proceeding that requires a flight crewmember who is employed by an air carrier conducting operations under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, and who accepts an additional assignment for flying under part 91 of such title from the air carrier or from any other air carrier conducting operations under part 121 or 135 of such title, to apply the period of the additional assignment (regardless of whether the assignment is performed by the flight crewmember before or after an assignment to fly under art 121 of such title) toward any limitation applicable to the flight crewmember relating to duty periods or flight times under part 121 of such title.

Alternatives: There are no alternatives.

Costs and Benefits: The estimated benefit of this rule will be near zero because there have been no ferry flight accidents associated with fatigue in the past 10 years. However, the accident rate over the past 20 years has indicated that ferry flights have contributed to those accidents. The costs could be substantial because this rule will impose part 121 flight duty and rest limits on flights that are not currently subject to flight duty and rest limits.

Risks: There are no risks.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Dale Roberts Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202 267-5749
E-Mail: dale.roberts@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK24

View Related Documents

Title: Fuel Tank and System Lightning Protection (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would remove the requirement covering lightning ignition sources for fuel tank ignition prevention. It would also re-state the intention to prevent catastrophic fuel tank vapor ignition due to lightning in the broader fuel system lighting protection requirements. This action is necessary because of the impracticality of controlling structural lightning ignition sources, which has resulted in a series of exemptions. This action would be cost-relieving as it would remove the need to comply with a specific requirement that has provided little or no safety benefits.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 25 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44704 Legal Deadline: NoneRegulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The Large Airplane Fuel System Lightning Protection Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) has concluded that, in the context of lightning protection, compliance with section 25.981 for fuel tank systems provides little or no reliability or safety benefits and is not cost effective. The ARC also reported that fuel tank systems design features intended for compliance have had adverse effects. This rulemaking project would remove prevention of lightning ignition sources from section 25.981(a)(3), and relocate a new broader requirement in the existing section 25.954 that allows applicants to consider both controlling ignition sources and fuel tank flammability. We will rewrite section 25.954 to expand and clarify its objective and to modify it to meet current knowledge about lightning and state-of-the-art airplane design. To preserve the future integrity of lightning protection features of airplanes certificated under the amended rules, we will create a new section in part 25 appendix H specific to airworthiness of fuel tank and system lightning protection features.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/00/2014

Additional Information: This is a relieving rulemaking project, so no significant costs are anticipated. Based on historical numbers of related exemptions and type certification applications, we estimate that we would not have to process 40 exemptions over the next 20 years.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Massoud Sadeghi
Aircraft Certification Service Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave, SW , Renton, WA 98055-4056 Renton , WA 98055-4056
Phone: 425 227-2117

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK28

View Related Documents

Title: Part 61 and 91 Recommended Rule Changes (Retrospective Regulatory Review)

Abstract: This rulemaking would relieve burdens on pilots seeking to obtain aeronautical experience for certification and recently by promoting increased use of aviation training devices which have proven an effective, safe, and affordable means of obtaining pilot experience. The rulemaking also addresses changing technologies by accommodating the use of electronic logbooks and providing an alternative that permits pilots to train in technologically advanced airplanes in place of older complex single engine airplanes. Additionally, the rulemaking broadens the opportunities for military instructors to obtain civilian ratings based on military experience, expands opportunities for logging pilot time, and removes a burden on sport pilot instructors by permitting them to serve as safety pilots. Finally, this rulemaking corrects several unintended burdens resulting from a 2009 final rule and codifies several exemptions.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 141; 14 CFR 61; 14 CFR 91 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 1155; 49 USC 40103; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40120; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44111; 49 USC 44701 to 44704; 49 USC 44707; 49 USC 44709 to 44712; 49 USC 44715 to 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC 45102; 49 USC 45103; 49 USC 45301; 49 USC 45302; 49 USC 46306; 49 USC 46315; 49 USC 46316; 49 USC 46504; 49 USC 46506-46507; 49 USC 47122; 49 USC 47528-47531; 49 USC 47508; Article 12 of Convention on ICA; Article 29 of
Convention on ICA Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:Statement of Need: The purpose of this project is to make regulatory text changes to parts 61, 91, and 141, primarily to provide clarity to the existing regulations, maintain standards that are consistent with changes in technology, and reduce burden on the agency and industry where feasible without impacting safety. The rule changes are a cumulative result of information received from the aviation industry, internal feedback from FAA personnel, and requests for legal interpretations. Additionally, some of the changes in the language of the rule are necessary to clarify requirements that lack sufficient details for compliance.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/00/2014

Additional Information: SB: N, IC: N, SLT: N Anticipated Costs/Benefits: The costs and benefits related to this action have not been determined at this time. However, this is a nonsignificant regulatory action whose benefits will be great enough to outweigh any costs. Progress Update: FAA is drafting NPRM.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Marcel Bernard Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 55 M Street, SE, Washington, DC 20003 Washington , DC 20003
Phone: 202 385-9616
E-Mail: marcel.bernard@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK29

View Related Documents

Title: Harmonization of Airworthiness Standards Fire Extinguishers and Class B and F Cargo Compartments

Abstract: This rulemaking would harmonize several part 25 fire extinguisher and cargo compartment requirements with those in the EASA Certification Specifications for Large Aeroplanes (CS-25). It would limit the size of an existing cargo compartment, add a new definition for a class of cargo compartments without size limitation, update associated fire extinguisher requirements, and propose cargo liner and floor panel requirements and their material testing criteria for the narrow cargo compartments. This action would benefit manufacturers who would only need to consider one single set of certification requirements.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 25 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rulemaking is needed because of differences between the regulations of the FAA and foreign certification authorities increase the cost and complexity of certification without contributing significantly to safety. This rulemaking results from an agreement between the European Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA), the predecessor to EASA, and the FAA to harmonize certain existing rules, which would benefit manufacturers who would only need to consider one single set of certification requirements. Regulatory wording is also simplified to clarify the rules and prevent misinterpretation.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Additional Information: This rulemaking is generally minimal cost.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Mahinder Wahi Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave, SW, Renton, WA 98057 Renton , WA 98057
Phone: 425-227- 1262
E-Mail: mahinder.wahi@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK30

View Related Documents

Title: Requirements for Protection of Fuel Tanks from Flame Propagation through Fuel Vent Lines

Abstract: This rulemaking would modify the airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes to require fuel tank designs that prevent a fuel tank explosion caused by flame propagation through the vent system from a post-crash ground fire or from lightning strikes. Preventing a fuel tank explosion following an accident provides additional time for the safe evacuation of

passengers.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 121; 14 CFR 25; 14 CFR 26 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40119; 49 USC 41706; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44704; 49 USC 44705; 49 USC 44709 to 44711; 49 USC 44713; 49 USC 44716; 49 USC 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC 46105 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rulemaking would modify the airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes to require fuel tank designs that prevent a fuel tank explosion caused by flame propagation through the vent system from a post-crash ground fire or from lightning strikes. Preventing a fuel tank explosion following an accident provides additional time for the safe evacuation of passengers.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Mike Dostert
Federal Aviation Administration Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue SW , Renton, WA 98055-4056 Renton , WA 98055-4056
Phone: 425-227- 2132
FAX: 425-227-1320E-Mail: mike.dostert@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK34

View Related Documents

Title: Flammability Requirements for Transport Category Airplanes

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the regulations on compartment interior fire protection to eliminate unnecessary testing, improve safety in inaccessible areas, and present the requirements as performance standards on the basis of threat. These changes are necessary as the current requirements result in unnecessary testing, are lacking in the areas most vulnerable to in-flight fire, and lack standardization. These changes will improve safety and reduce costs.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 25 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44704 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: These changes are necessary as the current requirements result in unnecessary testing, are lacking in the areas most vulnerable to in-fligh fire, and lack standardization. These changes will improve safety and reduce costs.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/00/2014

Additional Information: The rule would make the Agency’s regulatory program more effective and less burdensome; provide quantifiable monetary savings, and quantifiable reductions in burdens associated with certification documentation. It would also modify and streamline regulations in light of available data including the rise of new technologies.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Jeff Gardlin

Federal Aviation Administration Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave, SW, Renton, WA 98055-4056 Renton , WA 98055-4056
Phone: 425 227-2136
E-Mail: jeff.gardlin@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AA64

View Related Documents

Title: Airworthiness Directives

Abstract: This rule would provide for the issuance of Airworthiness Directives (AD ́s) as needed to address any unsafe condition in a type certificated product, if that unsafe condition is likely to exist or develop in products of the same type design. Airworthiness Directives are legally enforceable rules that apply to the following type certificated products: aircraft, aircraft engines, propellers, and appliances. Part 39 of CFR title 14 requires each operator of a product affected by an AD to comply with the terms of the AD, to continue to operate that product. The AD may mandate operational limitations, maintenance, or alterations for the affected product. The vast majority of routine and frequent ADs are nonsignificant. Total actions expected--550. 10/00/2013--10/00/2014.

Priority: Routine and Frequent Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 39 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 44701 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Actions Will Continue Through 10/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: David Hempe
Aircraft Certification Service Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202-267- 3394
E-Mail: david.hempe@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AA65

View Related Documents

Title: Standard Instrument Approach Procedures

Abstract: This rule would provide for instrument descent to airports in the United States. Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) are a nonsignificant body of regulations that are complex and technical in nature and require routine and frequent rulemaking to maintain efficiency. The FAA issues, revises, and cancels SIAPs by adopting amendments that are incorporated into 14 CFR part 97. Contemporaneously with publication in the Federal Register, the SIAPs are made available to the Aeronautical Charting and Cartography Office in the FAA and other publishers of aeronautical charts, where they are published as approach procedure charts or "approach plates." These charts are made available to the members of the aviation community for use by pilots in making instrument approaches. Total actions expected--3300. 10/00/2013--10/00/2014.

Priority: Routine and Frequent Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 97 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 40103; 49 USC 40106; 49 USC 40113 to 40114; 49 USC 40120; 49 USC 44502; 49 USC 44514; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44719; 49 USC 44721 to 44722; 49 USC 106(g) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Actions Will Continue Through 10/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Gary Powell Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 470 L'Enfant Plaza, SW, Washington, DC 20024 Washington , DC 20024
Phone: 202-385- 4589
E-Mail: gary.l.powell@faa.govDepartment of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ17

View Related Documents

Title: Prohibition on Personal Use of Electronic Devices on the Flight Deck (Personal Use of PEDs)

Abstract: This rulemaking will prohibit flight crewmembers in part 121 operations from using a wireless communications device or laptop computer for personal use while at their duty station while the aircraft is being operated. This rulemaking will also clarify that this prohibition does not apply to the use of wireless communications devices for a purpose directly related to operation of the aircraft. The action is necessary to mitigate distractions in the cockpit, increase situational awareness, and reinforce sterile cockpit procedures, as recommended by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). Additionally, this action is necessary to conform with the requirements of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-95, sec. 307).

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 121 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40119; 49 USC 41706; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44705; 49 USC 44709 to 44711; 49 USC 44713; 49 USC 44716; 49 USC 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC

46105 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory NPRM 11/16/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: High-profile aviation incidents involving a breakdown of sterile cockpit discipline prompted Congress to address the issue in the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. The FAA also received a recommendation (A-10-30) from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) to require all part 121, 135, and 91K operators to incorporate explicit guidance to pilots, including checklist reminders as appropriate, prohibiting the use of personal portable electronic devices on the flight deck.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/15/2013 78 FR 2912

NPRM Comment Period End 03/18/2013

Final Rule 01/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Nancy L Claussen

Federal Aviation Administration Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202-267- 8166
E-Mail: nancy.claussen@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ34

View Related Documents

Title: Supercooled Large Droplet Icing Conditions

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the airworthiness standards applicable to certain transport category airplanes certificated for flight in icing conditions and the icing airworthiness standards applicable to certain aircraft engines. Therulemaking would improve safety by addressing supercooled large drop icing conditions for transport category airplanes most affected by supercooled large drop icing conditions, mixed phase and ice crystal conditions for all transport category airplanes, and supercooled large drop, mixed phase, and ice crystal icing conditions for all turbine engines. This rulemaking is the result of information gathered from a review of icing accidents and incidents.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 23; 14 CFR 25 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44704 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule 11/29/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This proposal is needed to respond to recommendations from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) (A-96-54 and A-96-56) and the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC), and to improve the safety of transport category airplanes operating in supercooled large drop (SLD), mixed phase, and ice crystal icing conditions.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/29/2010 75 FR 37311

Comment Period Extended 08/16/2010 75 FR 49865

NPRM Comment Period End 08/30/2010

End of Extended Comment Period 09/29/2010

Final Rule 06/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Robert Hettman

ANM- 112, Transport Airplane Directorate Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98057 Renton , WA 98057
Phone: 425-227- 2683
E-Mail: robert.hettman@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ42

View Related Documents

Title: Student Pilot Application Requirements (Formerly Photo Requirements for Pilot Certificates)

Abstract: This rulemaking would require digital photos on all pilot certificates. This action is necessary to update regulations about pilot plastic certificates. The intended effect of this action is to meet requirements of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act. Since the close of the comment period, FAA reauthorization was passed. Section 321 of Public Law 112-95 imposes additional requirements for the issuance of improved pilot certificates. The FAA is currently evaluating this rulemaking in light of these requirements.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 61 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 45301; 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 44701 to 44703; 49 USC 44707; 49 USC 44709 to44711; 49 USC 45102; 49 USC 45103; 49 USC 45302; PL 108-458, secs 4012 and 4022 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory NPRM 06/17/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This action would require all pilots, including student pilots, to obtain and carry a pilot certificate with a photo in order to exercise the privileges of the pilot certificate. Additionally, the rule would modify the process by which pilots, including student pilots, apply for a pilot certificate and modifies the fee structure related to obtaining, renewing, or replacing pilot certificates. Student pilot certificates would also have the same duration as other pilot certificates. This action includes a 5- year implementation schedule for the new pilot certificates with photo. This rule would fulfill section 4022 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act, which requires the FAA to issue improved pilot certificates that (1) are resistant to tampering, altering, or counterfeiting; (2) include a photograph of the individual to whom the certificate is issued; and (3) are capable of accommodating a digital photograph, a biometric identifier, or any other unique identifier the FAA Administrator considers necessary.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/19/2010 75 FR 70871

NPRM Comment Period End 02/17/2011

Final Rule 06/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Bradley Palmer Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington , DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202-385- 9617
E-Mail: bradley.palmer@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ53

View Related Documents

Title: Air Ambulance and Commercial Helicopter Operations; Safety Initiatives and Miscellaneous Amendments

Abstract: This rulemaking would change equipment and operating requirements for commercial helicopter operations, including many specifically for helicopter air ambulance operations. This rulemaking is necessary to increase crew, passenger, and patient safety. The intended effect is to implement National Transportation Safety Board, Aviation Rulemaking Committee, and internal

FAA recommendations.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 1; 14 CFR 135; 14 CFR 91; 14 CFR 120 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 1155; 49 USC 40101 to 40103; 49 USC 40120; 49 USC 41706; 49 USC 41721; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44106; 49 USC 44111; 49 USC 46306; 49 USC 46315; 49 USC 46316; 49 USC 46504; 49 USC 46506; 49 USC 46507; 49 USC 47122; 49 USC 47508; 49 USC 47528 to 47531; 49 USC 44701 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory 49 USC 44730(b), as enacted under PL 112-95, sec. 306(b) (Feb. 14, 2012) 06/01/2012

Regulatory Plan:Statement of Need: Since 2002, there has been an increase in fatal helicopter air ambulance accidents. The FAA has undertaken initiatives to address common factors that contribute to helicopter air ambulance accidents including issuing notices, handbook bulletins, operations specifications, and advisory circulars (ACs). This rule would codify many of those initiatives, as well as several NTSB and Part 125/135 Aviation Rulemaking Committee recommendations. This rule would also satisfy the rulemaking requirements for helicopter air ambulance operations in PL 1112-95, section 306.

Legal Basis: This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in 49 U.S.C. 44701(a)(4), which requires the Administrator to promulgate regulations in the interest of safety for the maximum hours or periods of service of airmen and other employees of air carriers, and 49 U.S.C. 44701(a)(5), which requires the Administrator to promulgate regulations and minimum standards for other practices, methods, and procedures necessary for safety in air commerce and national security.

Alternatives: Alternative One: The alternative would exclude the HTAWS (Helicopter Terrain Awareness and Warning System) unit from this proposal. Although the ratio of annualized cost to annual revenue would decrease from a range of between 1.80 percent and 1.87 percent to a range of between 1.61 percent and 1.68 percent would also be a reduction in safety. The HTAWS is an outstanding tool for situational awareness in all aspects of flying including day, night, and instrument meteorological conditions. Therefore the FAA believes that this equipment is a significant enhancement for safety. Alternative Two: The alternative would increase the requirement of certificate holders from 10 to 15 helicopters or more that are engaged in helicopter air ambulance operations to have an Operations Control Center. The FAA believes that operators with 10 or more helicopters engaged in air ambulance operations would cover 83 percent of the total population of the air ambulance fleet in the U.S. The FAA believes that operators with 15 or more helicopters would decrease the coverage of the population to 78 percent. Furthermore, complexity issues arise and considerably increase with operators of more than 10 helicopters. All alternatives above are not considered to be acceptable by the FAA in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603(c).

Costs and Benefits: The FAA estimated the rule would cost $309 million ($242 million 7 percent present value) over 10 years. The benefits were estimated to be $1030 million ($725 million 7 percent present value) over 10 years. This is a preliminary estimate that is subject to change based on further review and analysis.

Risks: Helicopter air ambulance operations have several characteristics that make them unique, including that they are not limited to airport locations for picking up and dropping off patients, but may pick up a person at a road side accident scene and transport him or her directly to a hospital. Helicopter air ambulance operations are also often time-sensitive. A helicopter air ambulance flight may be crucial to getting a donor organ or critically ill or injured patient to a medical facility as efficiently as possible. Additionally, patients generally are not able to choose the helicopter air ambulance company that provides them with transportation. Despite the fact that there are unique aspects to helicopter air ambulance operations, they remain, at their core, air transportation. Accordingly the FAA has the responsibility for ensuring the safety of these operations.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/12/2010 75 FR 62640

NPRM Comment Period End 01/10/2011

Final Rule 12/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Gregory French Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202-493- 5474
FAX: 202-267- 5094
E-Mail: gregory.french@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ58

View Related Documents

Title: Flight and Duty Time Limitations and Rest Requirements

Abstract: The purpose of this action is to correct an error in the final regulatory evaluation used to support a January 4, 2012 final rule. FAA will seek comments on a draft supplemental regulatory evaluation before issuing a final correction. The rule amended existing flight, duty, and rest regulations applicable to certificate holders conducting passenger-carrying operations and their flightcrew members operating under 14 CFR part 121. The rule eliminated distinctions between domestic, flag, and supplemental operations. Also, the rule provided different requirements based on the time of day, whether an individual is acclimated to a new time zone, and the likelihood of being able to sleep under different circumstances. This rule improved aviation safety by providing applicable persons with the opportunity for sufficient rest.Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 121; 14 CFR 117 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40119; 49 USC 41706; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44705; 49 USC 44705; 49 USC 44709; 49 USC 44710; 49 USC 44711; 49 USC 44712; 49 USC 44713; 49 USC 44715; 49 USC 44716; 49 USC 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC 45101; 49 USC 45102; 49 USC 45103; 49 USC 45104; 49 USC 45105; 49 USC 46105 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule 08/01/2011

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The FAA recognizes that the effects of pilot fatigue are universal, and the profiles of different types of operations are similar enough that the same fatigue mitigations should be applied across all types of operations. In June 2009, the FAA established the Flight and Duty Time Limitations and Rest Requirements Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) whose membership includes labor, industry, and FAA representatives. The ARC reviewed current approaches to mitigating fatigue and in September 2009 made recommendations to the Associate Administrator for Aviation Safety on how to address this issue in FAA regulations. The ARC considered- • An approach to fatigue that consolidates and replaces existing regulatory requirements; • Current fatigue science, data, and information; • How current international standards address fatigue; and • The use of Fatigue Risk Management Systems. Based on ARC recommendations, the FAA is developing new regulations on crewmember flight, duty and rest requirements.

Legal Basis: The FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety is found in title 49 of the United States Code. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in 49 U.S.C. 44701(a)(5), which requires the Administrator to promulgate regulations and minimum standards for other practices, methods, and procedures necessary for safety in air commerce and national security.

Alternatives: The FAA is currently reviewing alternatives to rulemaking.

Costs and Benefits: The proposed rule is designated as "significant regulatory action" as designated in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. In addition, the proposed rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. Quantifiable costs and benefits to be determined.

Risks: The FAA will review specific risks associated with this rulemaking.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/14/2010 75 FR 55852

NPRM Comment Period End 11/15/2010

Final Rule 01/04/2012 77 FR 330

Correction 05/16/2012 77 FR 28763
Notice of Availability of Initial Supplemental Regulatory Impact 12/12/2012 77 FR 73911

Correction 02/06/2013 78 FR 8361

Comment Period End 02/11/2013

Correction 02/15/2013 78 FR 11090

Clarification 03/05/2013 78 FR 14166
Final Regulatory Supplemental Regulatory Impact Analysis 04/00/2014

Final Rule Correction of Effective Date 04/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2120- AF63; Related to 2120- AI93 Agency Contact: Dale Roberts Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202 267-5749
E-Mail: dale.roberts@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ61

View Related DocumentsTitle: Repair Stations

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the repair station regulations to add criteria whereby the FAA could deny an application for a new repair station certificate if the applicant or certain associated key individuals had materially contributed to the circumstances that caused a previous repair station certificate revocation action. The amendment responds to a National Transportation Safety Board recommendation that the FAA should have a mechanism similar to the one it has for air carriers whereby an application for an operating certificate could be denied if the applicant or certain key management personnel had materially contributed to a prior certificate revocation. The rule would also add a new section prohibiting fraudulent or intentionally false entries in any application, record, or report made under the repair station rules, and provides that making the fraudulent or intentionally false entry is grounds for suspending or revoking any certificate, approval, or authorization issued by the FAA to the person who made the entry. This amendment is necessary because the repair station rules do not presently have a prohibition against fraudulent or intentionally false entries as do other parts of the FAA ́s regulations. Both of these changes would enhance safety because they would reduce the number of individuals in the repair station industry who commit intentional and serious violations of the regulations or who demonstrate they are otherwise unqualified to hold repair stations certificates. Additionally, the rule adopts several administrative changes to clarify the intent of the current rule and correct minor

errors.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 145 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 44701 to 44702; 49 USC 44707; 49 USC 44709; 49 USC 44717 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final rule 03/19/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/21/2012 77 FR 30054

NPRM Comment Period Extended 08/17/2012 77 FR 49740

Comment Period End 08/20/2012

Comment Period Extended 11/19/2012

Final Rule 12/00/2013

Additional Information: FAA estimates this action to be minimal costs.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: John J Goodwin Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 950 L'Enfant Plaza North, SW, Washington, DC 20024 Washington , DC 20024
Phone: 202 385-6417
E-Mail: john.j.goodwin@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ86

View Related Documents

Title: Safety Management Systems for Part 121 Certificate Holders

Abstract: This rulemaking would require each certificate holder operating under 14 CFR part 121 to develop and implement a safety management system (SMS) to improve the safety of its aviation related activities. A safety management system is acomprehensive, process-oriented approach to managing safety throughout an organization. An SMS includes an organizationwide safety policy; formal methods for identifying hazards, controlling, and continually assessing risk and safety performance; and promotion of a safety culture. SMS stresses not only compliance with technical standards, but increased emphasis on the overall safety performance of the organization. This rulemaking is required under Public Law 111-216, sec. 215.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 121; 14 CFR 5 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40119; 49 USC 41706; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44705; 49 USC 44709 to 44711; 49 USC 44713; 49 USC 44716; 49 USC 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC46105; PL 111-216, sec 215 Legal Deadline: Congress passed Public Law 111-216 that instructs FAA to conduct a rulemaking to require all part 121 air carriers to implement a Safety Management System (SMS). This Act further states that FAA shall consider at a minimum each of the following as part of the SMS rulemaking: (1) An Aviation Safety Action Program (ASAP); (2) a Flight Operations Quality Assurance Program (FOQA); (3) a Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA); and (4) an Advance Qualifications Program.

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory NPRM 10/29/2010

Other Statutory Final Rule 07/30/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This final rule requires each air carrier operating under 14 CFR part 121 to develop and implement asafety management system (SMS) to improve the safety of its aviation-related activities. SMS is a comprehensive, processoriented approach to managing safety throughout an organization. SMS includes an organization-wide safety policy; formal methods for identifying hazards, controlling, and continually assessing risk and safety performance; and promotion of a safety culture. SMS stresses not only compliance with technical standards, but also increased emphasis on the overall safety performance of the organization.

Legal Basis: The Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) authority to issue rules on aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in 49 U.S.C. 44701(a)(5), which requires the Administrator to promulgate regulations and minimum standards for other practices, methods, and procedures necessary for safety in air commerce and national security. In addition, the Airline Safety and Federal Aviation Administration Extension Act of 2010 (the Act), Public Law 111-216, sec. 215 (August 1, 2010), required the FAA to conduct rulemaking to "require all 14 CFR part 121 air carriers to implement a safety management system." The Act required the FAA to issue this final rule within 24 months of the passing of the Act (July 30, 2012).

Alternatives: To relieve the burden of this rule on small entities, the FAA considered extending the timeframe for development of SMS implementation plans. However, the FAA ultimately concluded that one year for the development and approval of implementation plans is appropriate. In making this determination, the FAA considered longer and shorter terms. However, it settled on one year based on information from the SMS Pilot Project, which showed that an average of one year was sufficient to develop and approve an implementation plan. As part of its analysis, the FAA noted that pilot project participants ultimately had differing levels of SMS implementation. However, because all pilot project participants had initially developed (and received FAA validation on) an implementation plan that provided for full SMS implementation, the FAA was able to use this data to estimate how long it would take a certificate holder to develop such a plan and get the plan approved by the FAA.

Costs and Benefits: The FAA estimates the total benefits to be $447.9 million ($263.1 million present value) and total costs to be $211.8 million ($144.9 million present value), with benefits exceeding costs.

Risks: While the commercial air carrier accident rate in the United States has decreased substantially over the past 10 years, the FAA has identified a recent trend involving hazards that were revealed during accident investigations. The FAA's Office of Accident Investigation and Prevention identified 128 accidents involving part 121 air carriers from fiscal year (FY) 2001 through FY 2010 for which identified causal factors could have been mitigated if air carriers had implemented an SMS to identify hazards in their operations and developed methods to control the risk. This type of approach allows air carriers to anticipate and mitigate the likely causes of potential accidents. This is a significant improvement over current "reactive" safety action emphasis, which focuses on discovering and mitigating the cause of an accident only after that accident has occurred. In order to bring about this change in accident mitigation, as well as the other reasons discussed throughout this document, the FAA is requiring part 121 air carriers to develop and implement an SMS. SMS is a comprehensive, process-oriented approach to managing safety throughout an organization, and stresses not only compliance with technical standards, but increased emphasis on the overall safety performance of the organization. The potential reduction of risks would be averted causalities,aircraft damage, and accident investigation costs by identifying safety issues and spotting trends before they result in a nearmiss, incident, or accident.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/05/2010 75 FR 68224

NPRM Comment Period Extended 01/31/2011 76 FR 5296

NPRM Comment Period End 02/03/2011

Comment Period Extended 03/07/2011

Final Rule 03/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Split From 2120- AJ15 Agency Contact: Scott VanBuren Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591Phone: 202 494-8417
E-Mail: scott.vanburen@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ96

View Related Documents

Title: Stage 3 Helicopter Noise Certification Standards

Abstract: This rulemaking would adopt noise standards for helicopters. This noise standard would ensure that the latest available noise reduction technology is incorporated into new helicopter designs. The noise standard would apply to any applicant seeking to noise certify a new helicopter type design on and after the effective date of the final rule. It is intended to provide uniform noise certification standards for stage 3 helicopters certificated in the U.S. and for helicopters that meet the ICAO annex 16 Helicopter chapter 8 and chapter 11 noise standards adopted on June 29, 2001.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 36 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 4321; 42 USC 7572; 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40105; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44704; 49 USC 44709; 49 USC 44711; 49 USC 44715; 49 USC 45303 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final rule 03/19/2014

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Although ICAO adopted increased noise stringency standards for helicopters in 2002, the United States has yet to adopt these standards into part 36. There has been heightened public awareness of helicopter noise in the United States, and the FAA has determined that the public would benefit from adoption of these more stringent standards. The FAA’s adoption of these more stringent certification standards into part 36, including the limits in Appendices H and J, also satisfies the goal of harmonizing U.S. regulations with international standards.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/18/2012 77 FR 57524

NPRM Comment Period End 11/19/2012

Final Rule 01/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Sandy Liu
Office of Environment and Energy Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, sw, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202 493-4864

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK11

View Related DocumentsTitle: Minimum Altitudes for Use of Autopilots (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking will modify the way pilots operate an aircraft ́s autopilot capabilities during flight. This action is necessary because evolving aircraft technologies have outpaced current FAA ́s operational guidance for use of autopilots. The intended effect of this rulemaking is to allow movement of aircraft in safer and more efficient flight patterns, resulting in operator efficiency, while smoothly incorporating ever-increasing related technological changes.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 121; 14 CFR 125; 14 CFR 135 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40119; 49 USC 41706; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44705; 49 USC 44709; 49 USC 44710; 49 USC 44711; 49 USC 44711; 49 USC 44712; 49 USC 44713; 49 USC 44715; 49 USC 44716; 49 USC 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC 45101 to 45105; 49 USC 46105 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rulemaking supports the FAA’s Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen). NextGen requires an almost seamless integration of many systems and technologies to increase the level of safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of aircraft traveling across our National Airspace System (NAS). To support such objective, this final rule will accommodate current and future technological advances directly related to the use of autopilots for transport category airplanes. By aligning autopilots operational rules with new autopilot certification standards, updated in 2006, FAA will directly support the seamless implementation of NextGen technologies into the NAS.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/04/2012 77 FR 71735

NPRM Comment Period End 02/04/2013

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Additional Information: SB: N, IC: N, SLT: N Anticipated costs/benefits: This rulemaking would allow operators the option to operate as they currently do or pursue the proposed lower minimum use heights based on their aircraft certification. Status: FAA drafting FR.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2120- AE15; Related to 2120- AF19 Agency Contact: Kel Christianson Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 470 L'Enfant Plaza, SW, Washington, DC 20024 Washington , DC 20024
Phone: 202-385- 4702
E-Mail: kel.christianson@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK27

View Related Documents

Title: Flight Data Recorder Airplane Parameter Specification Omission and Correction

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the operating regulations for flight data recorders by correcting errors in recording rates in three different appendices. These errors create requirements that could not be met by certain aircraft without extensive modification, which was not intended when the requirements were adopted. The corrected recording rates mirror what was discussed in the preamble to the final rule when the applicable flight data recorder parameter requirements were adopted; however, the requirements were accidentally omitted from the current publication of the regulatory text.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final RuleMajor: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 121; 14 CFR 125; 14 CFR 91 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 1155; 49 USC 40103; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40119; 49 USC 40120; 49 USC 41706; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44111; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44704; 49 USC 44705; 49 USC 44709 to 44711; 49 USC 44712; 49 USC 44713; 49 USC 44715 to 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC 46105; 49 USC 46306; 49 USC 46315; 49 USC 46316; 49 USC 46504; 49 USC 46506; 49 USC 46506 to 46507; 49 USC 47122; 49 USC 47508; 49 USC 47528 to 47531; 61 STAT 1180 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: These errors create requirements that could not be met by certain aircraft without extensive modification, which was not intended when the requirements were adopted. Currently, they can only be addressed through the exemption process. None of these changes will require action by aircraft owners, operators, or manufacturers as the affected aircraft already comply with the requirements of the originally adopted rules and the corrections adopted here. Since these requirements were intended in the original rules, there is no impact on safety. The correction of these errors and omissions will prevent future confusion and require less contact between the FAA and regulated entities who must comply with the regulations.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 07/03/2013 78 FR 39968

Comment Period End 08/02/2013

Final Rule Effective 09/03/2013
Disposition of Comments 12/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Chris Parfitt Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 950 L'Enfant Plaza North, SW, Washington, DC 20024 Washington , DC 20024
Phone: 202-385- 6398
E-Mail: chris.parfitt@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK35

View Related Documents

Title: SFAR 106 Amendment to Add Chart Sequal Technologys eQuinox and Vbox Trooper Portable Oxygen System (POC) (Use of Additional Portable Oxygen Concentrator Devices on Board Aircraft)

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend SFAR 106 to allow the addition of two new models of Portable Oxygen Concentrators (POCs). This amendment, combined with the approval of aircraft operators, is necessary to properly add these new POC models to the existing list of POC options and to expand the number of options available for the traveling public in need of oxygen therapy.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 121 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC sec 44701
Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: POCs briefly store a small quantity of oxygen until the POC either 1) senses the user's inhalation or dispenses the oxygen (pulse technology), or 2) delivers the oxygen in a continous flow to the user. Most POCs are not considered hazardous materials by the Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety Administration (PHMSA). They do not requirethe same level of special handling as compressed oxygen and are safe for use on aircraft provided certain conditions for their

use are met.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2120- AK18; Related to 2120- AK32 Agency Contact: Denise K Deaderick

Air Transportation Division Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202 267-8166
E-Mail: dk.deaderick@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK36

View Related Documents

Title: Requirements for Chemical Oxygen Generators Installed on Transport Category Airplanes (Chemical Oxygen Standards)

Abstract: This rulemaking would introduce type certification requirements for chemical oxygen generator (COG) installations installed on transport category airplanes. This action is necessary to address potential security vulnerabilities with COGs and provide performance-based options for acceptable installations. The intended effect would increase the level of security and safety for future transport airplane designs. The RIN 2120-AK14 inadvertently closed as a completed action for the rulemaking
initiated under RIN 2120-AK21. RIN 2120-AK14 will continue under this new RIN.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 25 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44704; ... Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory 07/11/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/09/2013 78 FR 1765

NPRM Comment Period End 03/11/2013

Final Rule 12/00/2013

Additional Information: This action would impose minimal costs because it only applies to new type certificated airplanes, which would allow the manufacturer the maximum flexibility in designing the most cost-effective emerging oxygen system.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Related RINs: Previously Reported as 2120 -AK14 Agency Contact: Jeff Gardlin

Federal Aviation Administration Department of TransportationFederal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave, SW, Renton, WA 98055-4056 Renton , WA 98055-4056
Phone: 425 227-2136
E-Mail: jeff.gardlin@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AA63

View Related Documents

Title: Part 95 Instrument Flight Rules

Abstract: This is a nonsignificant body of regulations that prescribes altitudes governing the operation of aircraft under Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) on Air Traffic System (ATS) routes or other direct routes that have a designated Minimum Enroute Altitude (MEA). In addition, it designates mountainous areas and changeover points as they relate to route altitudes. These regulations are an established body of technical requirements that are issued routinely and frequently to maintain operational efficiency. Total actions expected--270. 10/00/2013--10/00/2014.

Priority: Routine and Frequent Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 95 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 40120; 49 USC 44502; 49 USC 44514; 49 USC 44719; 49 USC 44721; 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40103; 49 USC 40106; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40114 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Actions will continue through 10/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Gary Powell Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 470 L'Enfant Plaza, SW, Washington, DC 20024 Washington , DC 20024
Phone: 202-385- 4589
E-Mail: gary.l.powell@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ69

View Related Documents

Title: Prohibition Against Certain Flights Within the Territory and Airspace of Afghanistan

Abstract: This rulemaking would prohibit flight operations below flight level (FL) 160 within the territory and airspace of Afghanistan by all U.S. air carriers; U.S. commercial operators; persons exercising the privileges of a U.S. airman certificate, except if the flight is on behalf of a foreign air carrier; and operators of U.S.-registered aircraft, except when such operators are foreign air carriers. The FAA finds this action necessary to prevent a potential hazard to persons and aircraft engaged in such flight operations.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 91 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 1155; 49 USC 44704; 49 USC 44716; 49 USC 46507; 49 USC 47528 to 47531; 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 1155; 49 USC 40103; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40120; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44111; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44704; 49 USC 44709; 49 USC 44711; 49 USC 44712; 49 USC 44715; 49 USC 44716; 49 USC 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC 46306; 49 USC 46315; 49 USC 46316; 49 USC 46504; 49 USC 46506; 49 USC 46507; 49 USC 47122; 49 USC 47508; 49 USC 47528; 49 USC 47529; 49 USC 47530; 49 USC 47531 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory NPRM 06/10/2011Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This action prohibits flight operations below flight level (FL) 160 within the territory and airspace of Afghanistan with limited exceptions by all U.S. air carriers, U.S. commercial operators, persons exercising the privileges of an airman certificate issued by the FAA (except such persons operating U.S.-registered aircraft for a foreign air carrier), and operators of U.S.-registered aircraft (except where the operator of such aircraft is a foreign air carrier) (hereinafter "applicable persons"). The FAA finds this action necessary to prevent a potential hazard to persons and aircraft engaged in such flight operations. The final rule will permit certain flight operations by applicable persons to operate below FL160, subject to FAA
authorization.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Undetermined

NPRM 05/26/2010 75 FR 29466

NPRM Comment Period End 06/10/2010

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Deke Abbott Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202 267-8266
E-Mail: deke.abbott@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ71

View Related Documents

Title: Requirement for Wildlife Assessments at Certificated Airports

Abstract: This rulemaking would require a Wildlife Hazard Assessment (scientific evaluation of wildlife populations and their attractants) for certificated airports. This rulemaking would also require periodic completion of a wildlife hazard assessment, or continuous wildlife monitoring as an alternative to the assessment, and clarify requirements for those conducting an assessment. This rulemaking is intended to decrease direct hazards (animals striking aircraft) and indirect hazards (animal burrowing and nesting in or near aircraft or aircraft operations areas).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 139 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 44704; 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 44701 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This action would require each certificate holder to complete a Wildlife Hazard Assessment (WHA). It also would require periodic completion of a WHA, provide an option for continuous wildlife monitoring as an alternative to a periodic WHA, and clarify the requirements for airport wildlife biologists conducting a WHA. This action would improve safety at airports through proactive identification and mitigation of wildlife hazards.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Undetermined

Additional Information: This rulemaking is on hold indefinitely.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: John Weller
Office of Airport Safety & Standards - Airport Safety & Operations Division Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202-267- 3778
E-Mail: john.weller@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ78

View Related Documents

Title: Regulation Of Flight Operations Conducted By Alaska Guide Pilots

Abstract: The rulemaking would establish regulations concerning Alaska guide pilot operations. The rulemaking would implement Congressional legislation and establish additional safety requirements for the conduct of these operations. The intended effect of this rulemaking is to enhance the level of safety for persons and property transported in Alaska guide pilot operations. In addition, the rulemaking would add a general provision applicable to pilots operating under the general operating and flight rules concerning falsification, reproduction, and alteration of applications, logbooks, reports, or records.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 119; 14 CFR 91 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 1153; 49 USC 1155; 49 USC 40101 to 40103; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40120; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44105 to 44016; 49 USC 44111; 49 USC 44701 to 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC 44901; 49 USC 44903 to 44904; 49 USC 44906; 49 USC 44912; 49 USC 44914; 49 USC 44936; 49 USC 44938; 49 USC 46103; 49 USC 46105; 49 USC 46306; 49 USC 46315 to 46316; 49 USC 46504; 49 USC 46506 to 46507; 49 USC 47122; 49 USC 47508; 49 USC 47528 to 47531; Articles 12 and 29 of 61 Stat 1180; sec 732 of PL 106-181 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Undetermined

Additional Information: Compliance costs not applicable

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Jeff Smith Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20785 Washington , DC 20785
Phone: 202 385-9615
E-Mail: jeffrey.smith@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ79View Related Documents

Title: Air Carrier Maintenance Training Program

Abstract: This rulemaking would require FAA approval of maintenance training programs of air carriers that operate aircraft type certificated for a passenger seating configuration of 10 seats or more (excluding any pilot seat). The intent of this rulemaking is to reduce the number of accidents and incidents caused by human error, improper maintenance, inspection, or repair practices.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 121; 14 CFR 135 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40119; 49 USC 41706; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44705; 49 USC 44709 to 47111; 49 USC 44713; 49 USC 44715; 49 USC 44716; 49 USC 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC 46105 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule 09/26/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This proposed rulemaking addresses air carrier maintenance requirements. The current regulations do not reflect changes in aircraft structure, components and systems, as well as changes in maintenance practices since the rules were first issued 68 years ago. In recent years the use of repair stations is becoming an integral and fundamental part of air carriers' operations. Because of the contractual relations between air carrier and contracted maintenance, there are not always specific requirements and training requirements for outsourced maintenance that exists at air carriers' facilities. This proposed rule would require FAA approved training requirements in a number of areas (e.g., air craft type, required inspection item, human factors) and such training is documented and revisions are submitted to FAA for review and approval.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Undetermined

Additional Information: This rulemaking is on hold indefinitely. The FAA expects the proposed required training would have mitigated 35 past accidents. The estimated value of mitigating these 35 past accidents was $141 million ($92 million present value) over 10 years. The costs to part 121 and part 135 air carriers would be approximately $135 million ($97 million present value).

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: John J Hiles Flight Standards Service Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 950 L'Enfant Plaza North, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202-385- 6421
E-Mail: john.j.hiles@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ99

View Related Documents

Title: System Safety Assessment

Abstract: This rulemaking would standardize regulations and guidance for conducting airplane-level safety assessments of various critical systems installed on transport category airplanes. Current differences happened over time as system safety rulesand policies were developed independently. This rulemaking would adopt Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee recommendations and harmonize with the European Aviation Safety Agency CS-25.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 35 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44704 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This project is needed to establish standardized criteria and guidance for conducting airplane level safety assessments of critical systems. Currently, there are differences in interpreting and applying criteria for airplane level safety assessments. These differences accumulated over time, as system safety rules/policies were developed independently (e.g., FAA’s approach to the fuel tank system regulation, or the various recommendations submitted by several harmonization working groups formed under the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) Transport Airplane and Engine Issues Group (TAEIG)).

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Undetermined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Linh Le Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave, SW, Renton, WA 98057 Renton , WA 98057
Phone: 425 227-1105
E-Mail: linh.le@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK26

View Related Documents

Title: Prohibition of Tail-End Ferry in Part 135 (FAA Reauthorization)

Abstract: This rulemaking would require a flightcrew member who is employed by an air carrier conducting operations under part 135, and who accepts an additional assignment for flying under part 91 from the air carrier or from any other air carrier conducting operations under part 121 or 135, to apply the period of the additional assignment toward any limitation applicable to the flightcrew member relating to duty periods or flight times under part 135. This rulemaking is mandated by section 345(b) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112-95 (Feb. 14, 2012).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 119; 14 CFR 135 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 1153; 49 USC 40101; 49 USC 40102; 49 USC 40103; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 41706; 49 USC 44105; 49 USC 44106; 49 USC 44111; 49 USC 44701 to 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC 44901; 49 USC 44903; 49 USC 44904; 49 USC 44906; 49 USC 44912; 49 USC 44914; 49 USC 44936; 49 USC 44938; 49 USC 45101 to 45105; 49 USC 46103 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Part 135 certificate holders often have to reposition their aircraft at the conclusion of the day's revenueflights to another airport for various reasons. Since these operations occur at the conclusion of the flightcrew member's duty day they are commonly referred to as a "tail-end ferry." Just like any positioning flight, a tail-end ferry is a nonrevenue flight. Under current part 119 and part 135 regulations, the flight time, duty, and rest requirements of part 135 do not apply to the tail-end ferry segment(s) that follow revenue operations and those segments are instead operated entirely under part 91. However, the flight time associated with the tail-end ferry must be recorded as other commercial flying. A ferry flight that is not conducted at the end of a flightcrew member's duty period is not a tail-end ferry, and as such, it is subject to the flight, duty, and rest rules that apply to the other flights in that flightcrew member's duty period. Flightcrew members conducting part 135 operations are limited to a maximum daily limit of 16 hours of duty for commuter (scheduled) operations and 14 hours of duty for on-demand (unscheduled) operations. A tail-end ferry has the potential to increase the flightcrew member's duty day; thus, increasing the fatigue risk and degrading the flightcrew member's performance and potentially increasing errors. Additionally, the tail-end ferry increases the flightcrew member's daily flight times, which is a time-on-task issue that contributes to potential fatigue-related errors. Section 345(b) of Public Law 112-95 directs the FAA to initiate a rulemaking "to require a flight crewmember who is employed by an air carrier conducting operations under part 135 of title 14, [CFR], and who accepts an additional assignment for flying under part 91 of such title. . to apply the period of the additional assignment . . . toward any limitation applicable to the flight crewmember relating to duty periods or flight times under part 135."

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Undetermined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Dale Roberts Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202 267-5749
E-Mail: dale.roberts@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK31

View Related Documents

Title: Pilot Records Database (HR 5900)

Abstract: This rulemaking would implement a Pilot Records Database as required by Public Law 111-216 (Aug. 1, 2010). Section 203 amends the Pilot Records Improvement Act by requiring the FAA to create a pilot records database that contains various types of pilot records. These records would be provided by the FAA, air carriers, and other persons who employ pilots. The FAA must maintain these records until it receives notice that a pilot is deceased. Air carriers would use this database to perform a record check on a pilot prior to making a hiring decision.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 118; 14 CFR 121; 14 CFR 125; 14 CFR 135; 14 CFR 91 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 1155; 49 USC 40103; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40119; 49 USC 40120; 49 USC 41706; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44111; 49 USC 44701 to 44705; 49 USC 44709 to 44713; 49 USC 44715 to 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC 45101 to 45105; 49 USC 46105; 49 USC 46306; 49 USC 46315; 49 USC 46316; 49 USC 46504; 49 USC 46507; 49 USC 47122; 49 USC 47508; 49 USC 47528 to 47531 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rule implements a Pilot Records Database as required by Public Law 111-216. Section 203 of Public Law 111-216 amends the Pilot Records Improvement Act (PRIA) by requiring the FAA to create a pilot records database that contains various types of pilot records. These records would be provided by the FAA, air carriers, and other persons who employ pilots. The FAA must maintain these records until it receives notice that a pilot is deceased. Air carriers would use thisdatabase to perform a record check on a pilot prior to making a hiring decision.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2015

Additional Information: Costs and benefits are not yet determined.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Jack O'Hare Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 6500 S. MacArthur Blvd, Oklahoma City, OK 73169 Oklahoma City , OK 73169
Phone: 405-954- 9808
E-Mail: jack.o'hare@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK32

View Related Documents

Title: Acceptance Criteria for Portable Oxygen Concentrators Used Onboard Aircraft (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would establish acceptance criteria for portable oxygen concentrators to be used by passengers onboard aircraft. This rulemaking would apply only to any portable oxygen concentrators not already listed for use onboard aircraft whose manufacturers wish them to be able to be used onboard aircraft. The use of previously-listed portable oxygen concentrators would not be affected by this rule. Previously, the FAA would examine each portable oxygen concentrator to determine its suitability for use onboard aircraft. This rulemaking would relieve burdens for passengers who would no longer be required to obtain a statement from their physician regarding the use of the portable oxygen concentrator. It would also relieve burdens for domestic, flag, supplemental, commuter, on-demand, and fractional owner operators that would no longer be required to specifically have their flightcrew members notified of the use of such portable oxygen concentrators onboard aircraft. Finally, it would relieve burdens for portable oxygen concentrator manufacturers who would no longer be required to have their portable oxygen concentrators specifically considered by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration and the FAA before those portable oxygen concentrators could be permitted to be used onboard aircraft.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 1; 14 CFR 11; 14 CFR 121; 14 CFR 125; 14 CFR 135; 14 CFR 91 (To search for a specific CFR, visit

the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(f); 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 1155; 49 USC 40103; 49 USC 40105; 49 USC 40109; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40119; 49 USC 40120; 49 USC 41706; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44110; 49 USC 44111; 49 USC 44502; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44704; 49 USC 44705; 49 USC 44709 to 44713; 49 USC 44715 to 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC 45101 to 45105; 49 USC 46102; 49 USC 46105; 49 USC 46306; 49 USC 46315; 49 USC 46316; 49 USC 46504; 49 USC 46506; 49 USC 46507; 49 USC 47122; 49 USC 47508; 49 USC 47528 to 47531; 61 Stat 1180 - Articles 12 and

29 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rulemaking would establish new acceptance criteria to continue to permit portable oxygen concentrators (POCs) to be used by passengers onboard aircraft. The FAA has permitted the use of POCs onboard aircraft through Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 106—Rules for use of portable oxygen concentrator systems on board aircraft. This rule would establish acceptance criteria that any POCs not already listed for use onboard aircraft whose manufacturers wish them to be able to be used onboard aircraft would be required to meet to be used onboard aircraft. Under the rulemaking, and similar to requirements found in SFAR No. 106, manufacturers would need to ensure a POC meets certain criteria. Four of the criteria in this rulemaking are identical to, or have the same effect as, existing requirements contained in SFAR No. 106.Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2014

Additional Information: SB: N; IC: Y; SLT: N Costs/benefits: This rule relieves regulatory burdens for manufacturers of POCs and passengers who use these devices while traveling. It also reduces burdens for part 119 certificate holders conducting operations under parts 121, 125, and 135. Progress: This rule is being developed by FAA.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Denise K Deaderick

Air Transportation Division Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202 267-8166
E-Mail: dk.deaderick@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK33

View Related Documents

Title: Pilot Biometric Certificates (FAA Reauthorization)

Abstract: This rulemaking would require the issuance of pilot certificates that are resistant to tampering, alteration, and counterfeiting. The certificates would include a photograph of the individual to whom the certificate is issued and will be a smart card that is able to accommodate biometric identifiers. Certificates would also be compliant with Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 201 (FIPS-201) or Personal Identity Verification-Interoperability (PIV-I) standards for processing through security checkpoints into airport sterile areas. Under section 321 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-95), the FAA is required to begin issuing new certificates no later than November 10, 2012.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 183; 14 CFR 187; 14 CFR 61 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 31 USC 9701; 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 106(l)(6); 49 USC 40104; 49 USC 40105; 49 USC 40109; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40114; 49 USC 44701 to 44703; 49 USC 44707; 49 USC 44709 to 44711; 49 USC 45102; 49 USC 45103; 49 USC 45301 to 45303; 49 USC 45305 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rule addresses the requirement of Public Law 112-95, the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, section 321. The FAA is mandated to issue improved pilot certificates consistent with certain requirements to pilots applying for or holding a student, recreational, sport, private, commercial, and airline transport pilot certificate. The certificates must be resistant to tampering, alteration, and counterfeiting; include a photograph of the individual to whom the certificate is issued for identification purposes, and be a smart card which is able to accommodate iris and fingerprint biometric identifiers. Additionally, the improved pilot certificates must be compliant with Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 201 (FIPS-201-1) or Personal Identity Verification–Interoperability Standards (PIV-I) for processing through security checkpoints into airport sterile areas.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Undetermined

Additional Information: There are no known safety benefits with expected costs likely in the hundreds of millions.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Bradley Palmer Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington , DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202-385- 9617
E-Mail: bradley.palmer@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ00

View Related Documents

Title: Qualification, Service, and Use of Crewmembers and Aircraft Dispatchers

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the regulations for crewmember and dispatcher training programs in domestic, flag, and supplemental operations. The rulemaking would enhance traditional training programs by requiring the use of flight simulation training devices for flight crewmembers and including additional training requirements in areas that are critical to safety. The rulemaking would also reorganize and revise the qualification and training requirements. The changes are intended to contribute significantly to reducing aviation accidents.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 119; 14 CFR 121; 14 CFR 135; 14 CFR 142; 14 CFR 65 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); PL 111-216, sec 208; PL 111-216, sec 209; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40119; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44705; 49 USC 44709 to 44711; 49 USC 44713; 49 USC 44716; 49 USC 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC 44901; 49 USC 44903; 49 USC 44904; 49 USC 44912; 49 USC 46105 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final rule 01/19/2013

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rule is necessary to address NTSB recommendations and requirements in the Airline Safety and Federal Aviation Administration Extension Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-216). The primary purpose of this final rule is to ensure that safety-critical training and evaluation is provided for crewmembers by establishing new requirements for part 121 commercial air carrier training programs. The changes seek to make a significant contribution to the FAA's accident reduction goal by directly addressing the safety goals from two recent FAA "Call to Action" initiatives including improvement of runway safety by requiring training in critical runway safety issues.

Legal Basis: The FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety is found in title 49 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), which vests final authority in the Administrator for carrying out all functions, powers, and duties of the administration relating to the promulgation of regulations and rules, and 44701(a)(5), which requires the Administrator to promulgate regulations and minimum standards for other practices, methods, and procedures necessary for safety in air commerce and national security. Also, Public Law 111-216 specifically required the FAA to conduct rulemaking to ensure that all flightcrew members receive ground training and flight training in recognizing and avoiding stalls, recovering from stalls, and recognizing and avoiding upset of an aircraft, as well as the proper techniques to recover from upset. Public Law 111-216 also directed the FAA to require air carriers to develop remedial training programs for flightcrew members who have demonstrated performance deficiencies or experienced failures in the training environment. In addition, Public Law 111-216 directed the FAA to issue a final rule with respect to the notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Register on January 12, 2009 (74 FR 1280).

Alternatives: There are no alternatives to this final rule that will address certain safety-critical provisions, which 1) enhance pilot training for rare but high risk scenarios, 2) provide the greatest safety benefit, and 3) require time to implement.Costs and Benefits: From 2013 to 2028, the FAA estimates the base case costs to air carriers for complying with the provisions of this final rule are $313.9 million in constant 2012 dollars. The present value of the base case is $149.8 million when discounted at a 7 percent annual rate and $226.1 million when discounted at 3 percent. The total estimated benefit of the final rule over the analysis period is $689 million in 2012 dollars. This stream of benefits has a present value of $317 million when discounted at 7 percent and $488 million when discounted at 3 percent. This information is a preliminary estimate that is subject to change based on further review and analysis.

Risks: This rule is necessary to address NTSB recommendations as well as requirements in Public Law 111-216. If this rule does not move forward, the risk is that crewmembers will not be provided with safety-critical training.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/12/2009 74 FR 1280
Proposed rule; notice of public meeting 03/12/2009 74 FR 10689

NPRM Comment Period Extended 04/20/2009 74 FR 17910

Comment Period End 05/12/2009

Extended Comment Period End 08/10/2009
Supplemental NPRM 05/20/2011 76 FR 29336

Comment Period Extended 06/23/2011 76 FR 36888

Comment Period End 07/19/2011

Comment Period End 09/19/2011

Final Rule 11/12/2013 78 FR 67800

Additional Information: For general questions, contact Nancy Lauck Claussen, Air Transportation Division (AFS-200), Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267- 8166; email nancy.l.claussen@faa.gov.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2120- AJ87; Related to 2120- AK08 Agency Contact: Nancy L Claussen

Federal Aviation Administration Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202-267- 8166
E-Mail: nancy.claussen@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ67

View Related Documents

Title: Pilot Certification and Qualification Requirements (Formerly First Officer Qualification Requirements) (HR 5900)

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the eligibility and qualification requirements for pilots engaged in part 121 air carrier operations. Additionally, it would modify the requirements for an airline transport pilot certificate. These actions are necessary because recent airline accidents and incidents have brought considerable attention to the experience level and training of air carrier flight crews. This rulemaking is a result of requirements in PL 111-216.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 121; 14 CFR 61; 14 CFR 135; 14 CFR 141; 14 CFR 142 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 35301 to 45302; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40119; 49 USC 41706; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44701(a)(5); 49 USC 44701 to 44703; 49 USC 44705; 49 USC 44707; 49 USC 44709 to 44711; 49 USC 44713; 49 USC 44716; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC 45102 to 45103; 49 USC 46105; 49 USC 44717; PL 111-216 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory NPRM 01/28/2011

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: These regulations require all pilots serving in part 121 operations to hold an Airline Transport Pilot (ATP)certificate and a type rating in the aircraft flown. The regulations also modify the ATP certificate requirements to require applicants to have 50 hours of aeronautical experience in class of aircraft and to complete academic and training in a flight simulator training device (FSTD) on multicrew operations and difficult operational conditions (e.g. adverse weather, high altitude). The regulations also require a pilot to have 1,000 hours of air carrier experience before serving as a pilot in command (PIC) in part 121 operations and establishes a restricted privileges ATP certificate that permits a pilot to serve as second in command (SIC) in part 121 operations.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 02/08/2010 75 FR 6164

ANPRM Comment Period End 04/09/2010

NPRM 02/29/2012 77 FR 12374

NPRM Comment Period End 04/30/2012

Final Rule 07/15/2013 78 FR 42324

Final Rule Effective 07/15/2013

Correction 07/25/2013 78 FR 44873

Correction 07/26/2013 78 FR 45055

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business; Organizations Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Barbara Adams Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202-267- 8166
E-Mail: barbara.adams@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AJ97

View Related Documents

Title: Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings (RRR)

Abstract: This action would update, simplify, and streamline rules of practice and procedure for filing and adjudicating complaints against federally-assisted airports. It would improve efficiency by enabling parties to file submissions with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) electronically, and by incorporating modern business practices into how the FAA handles complaints. This rulemaking is necessary to reflect changes in applicable laws and regulations, and to apply lessons learned since the existing rules were implemented in 1996. The intended effects of this action are to improve the efficiency of the complaint and investigation processes, and clarify process requirements for persons involved in complaint proceedings. Small businesses, including general aviation operators and aviation service businesses such as fixed-base operators (FBOs), charter providers, and aircraft management companies, who are often involved in complaints, would benefit from this rule because it would decrease time spent and volume of paper documents needed to process complaints by allowing parties to file electronically.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 16 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 1110; 49 USC 1111; 49 USC 1115; 49 USC 1116; 49 USC 1718(a); 49 USC 1718(b); 49 USC 1719; 49 USC 1723; 49 USC 1726; 49 USC 1727; 49 USC 322; 49 USC 40103(e); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40116; 49 USC 44502(b); 49 USC 46101; 49 USC 46104; 49 USC 46110; 49 USC 47104; 49 USC 47106(e); 49 USC 47107; 49 USC 47108; 49 USC 47111(d); 49 USC 47122; 49 USC 47123; 49 USC 47124; 49 USC 47125; 49 USC 47151; 49 USC 47152; 49 USC 47153; 49 USC 48103 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final rule 10/07/2013Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The intended effect of this action is to streamline and clarify the FAA's rules of practice for addressing complaints of noncompliance made against airports that receive Federal assistance. These revised procedures will affect all parties to such complaints filed with the FAA after the effective date of the rule. The revised procedures will improve the FAA's ability to administer fair and efficient proceedings, and therefore benefit those parties filing and responding to Part 16 complaints.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/05/2012 77 FR 13027

Correction 04/04/2012 77 FR 20319

Comment Period End 05/04/2012

NPRM Comment Period Reopened 05/17/2012 77 FR 29444

Comment Period End 06/07/2012

Final Rule 09/12/2013 78 FR 56135

Final Rule Effective 11/12/2013

Additional Information: SB: Y, IC: N, SLT: Y Anticipated costs/benefits: The rulemaking adds no costs. Small businesses, including general aviation operators and aviation service businesses such as fixed base operators (FBOs), charter providers, and aircraft management companies, who are often involved in complaints, would benefit from this rule because it would decrease time spent and volume of paper documents needed to process complaints by allowing parties to file electronically. A new option allowing a respondent to file a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment would potentially reduce the length of the proceedings. Because the rule does not involve widespread, mandated information collection/record keeping, it does not have ICR implications. Progress status: The final rule is in FAA coordination.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Jessie DiGregory Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202 267-3414
E-Mail: jessie.digregory@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK01

View Related Documents

Title: Combined Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs for Operators Conducting Commercial Air Tours (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would allow air carrier operators and commuter or on-demand operators that also conduct commercial air tour operations to combine the drug and alcohol testing required for each operation into one testing program. The current rule requires those operators to conduct separate testing programs for their commercial air tour operations. This results in an unnecessary duplication of effort. The intended effect of this rulemaking is to decrease operating costs by eliminating the requirement for duplicate programs while maintaining the level of safety intended by existing rules. This rulemaking would also clarify existing instructions within the rule, would correct a typographical error, and would remove language describing a practice that has been discontinued.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 120; 14 CFR 91 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40101 to 40103; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 41721; 49 USC 44106; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44702; 49 USC 44703; 49 USC 44709; 49 USC 44710; 49 USC 44711; 49 USC 45101 to 45105; 49 USC 46105; 49 USC

46306 Legal Deadline:Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final rule 12/31/2013

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Some part 121 air carriers and part 135 commuter and on-demand operators also conduct commercial air tours. Part 121 and part 135 each contain requirements for drug and alcohol testing. Until 2007, an operator’s drug and alcohol testing program covered its commercial air tour operations. In 2007, the National Air Tour Safety Standards rule (72 FR 6884, February 13, 2007) established a separate subpart in part 91 to govern commercial air tour operators. That rule required drug and alcohol testing for commercial air tour operations that was separate from, and in addition to, the testing required by part 121 and part 135. This final rule gives part 121 and part 135 operators with commercial air tour operations the option of administering one drug and alcohol testing program that will cover both operations. The intent of this action is to lessen the administrative burden on such operators. The FAA solicited comments through a notice of proposed rulemaking. The FAA received four comments, all of which supported the rule as proposed.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/02/2012 77 FR 39194

NPRM Comment Period End 08/31/2012

Final Rule 07/15/2013 78 FR 41999

Final Rule Effective 09/13/2013

Additional Information: SB: N, IC: N, SLT: N Anticipated Costs/Benefits: Currently, part 121 operators or part 135 operators who also conduct air tour operations must have separate drug and alcohol testing programs for the air tour operations and their other (part 121 or part 135) operations. The intended effect of this rulemaking is to decrease this duplicative drug and alcohol testing by eliminating the requirement for two testing programs while maintaining the level of safety required by the current drug and alcohol testing regulations. This may reduce operators' costs by allowing them to eliminate one testing program and its associated costs. This final rule will also reduce the FAA's costs by reducing the number of drug and alcohol testing programs that the FAA will have to inspect. Project Status: The final rule published 07/15/2013. The effective date is September 13, 2013.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Margo Banks Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202 267-8442
E-Mail: margo.d.banks@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK15

View Related Documents

Title: Exhaust Emissions Standards for New Aircraft Gas Turbine Engines and Identification Plate for Aircraft Engines (NOx Emissions Rule Update)

Abstract: This rulemaking would revise the nitrous oxide (NOx) emission standards for fuel venting and exhaust emission requirements for turbine-engine powered airplanes; amend Identification and Registration Marking for aircraft engines; add compliance flexibilities and other regulatory requirements for aircraft turbofan or turbojet engines with rated thrust greater than 26.7 kN, and incorporate certain requirements for aircraft gas turbine engines subject to exhaust emission standards. This rulemaking is necessary to conform with new EPA requirements and harmonize with ICAO standards.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 34; 14 CFR 45 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40103; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40114; 49 USC 44109 Legal Deadline: NoneRegulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This action amends the emission standards for turbine engine powered airplanes to incorporate the standards published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in a final rule on June 18, 2012. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.)(the CAA) requires the FAA to issue regulations to ensure compliance with the aircraft emission standards promulgated by the EPA. This action will amend 14 CFR to include the same emissions standards as promulgated by the EPA, and ensure the aircraft engines are properly identified.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 12/31/2012 77 FR 76842

Final Rule Effective 12/31/2012

Comment Period End 03/01/2013

Final Rule;Technical Amendment 10/23/2013 78 FR 63015
Final Rule; Disposition of Comments 10/23/2013 78 FR 63017

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Aimee Fisher Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20571 Washington , DC 20571
Phone: 202-267- 7705
E-Mail: aimee.fisher@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK23

View Related Documents

Title: Certified Flight Instructor Flight Reviews, Recent Pilot in Command Experience, Airmen Online Services

Abstract: This rulemaking would permit an airman who passes a practical test for issuance of a flight instructor certificate, a practical test for the addition of a rating to a flight instructor certificate, a practical test for renewal of a flight instructor certificate, or a practical test for the reinstatement of a flight instructor certificate to meet the 24-calendar month flight review requirements. This rule also clarifies that the generally applicable recent flight experience requirements do not apply to a pilot in command who is employed by a commuter or on-demand operator if the pilot in command is in compliance with the specific pilot in command qualifications and recent experience requirements for that commuter or on-demand operator. Finally, this rule would permit replacement airman and medical certificates to be requested online, or by any other method acceptable to the Administrator. These changes would relieve regulatory burdens and clarify existing regulations.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 61 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 44701 to 44703; 49 USC 44707; 49 USC 44709 to 44711; 49 USC 45102; 49 USC 45103 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rulemaking relieves burdens and clarifies existing regulations with the following amendments: (1) A flight review provides a regular assessment of pilot skills and aeronautical knowledge and a practical test evaluates pilot skills and aeronautical knowledge. Passing a practical test and successfully completing a flight review, within the same 24-calendar month period, is a redundant evaluation of an airman's proficiency. This rule eliminates the need for an airman that passes a flight instructor practical test to successfully complete a flight review within 24-calendar months by including the flight instructorpractical test as an exception in section 61.56(d). (2) This rulemaking also clarifies the exceptions to the recent flight experience requirements to act as pilot in command. Section 61.57 sets forth the recent flight experience requirements to act as pilot. When the FAA first proposed this exception to the recent flight experience requirements, it stated that the intention was to provide relief from "essentially redundant recency requirements" for part 121 and part 135 operators and their pilots in command. The FAA did not intend to exclude pilots employed by a certificated operator under part 121 or 135. This clarification is needed to relieve undue burdens to unintentionally excluded pilots employed by a certificated operator under part 121 or 135. (3) Finally, this amendment recognizes that Airmen Online Services may be used by pilots to request a replacement airman certificate for a lost or stolen certificate or obtain a document that provides temporary authority to exercise the privileges of an
airman certificate.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Rule 09/16/2013 78 FR 56822

Direct Final Rule Comment Period End 10/16/2013

Confirmation of Direct Final Rule Effective Date 11/05/2013 78 FR 66261

Direct Final Rule Effective 11/15/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: William Shergalis Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 55 M Street, SE, Washington, DC 20003 Washington , DC 20003
Phone: 202 385-9617
E-Mail: william.shergalis@faa.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) RIN: 2120-AK25

View Related Documents

Title: Terminating Operations of Jets of Weights At or Less Than 75,000 lbs. and Not Stage 3 Noise Compliant (Reauthorization)

Abstract: This rulemaking adopts the following statutory language, “[A]fter December 31, 2015, a person may not operate a civil subsonic jet airplane with a maximum weight of 75,000 pounds or less, and for which an airworthiness certificate (other than an experimental certificate) has been issued, to or from an airport in the United States unless the Secretary of Transportation finds that the aircraft complies with [S]tage 3 noise levels.”

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 91; 14 CFR 91 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 106(g); 49 USC 1155; 49 USC 40103; 49 USC 40113; 49 USC 40120; 49 USC 44101; 49 USC 44111; 49 USC 44701; 49 USC 44704; 49 USC 44709; 49 USC 44711; 49 USC 44712; 49 USC 44715; 49 USC 44716; 49 USC 44717; 49 USC 44722; 49 USC 46306; 49 USC 46315; 49 USC 46316; 49 USC 46504; 49 USC 46506; 49 USC 46507; 49 USC 47122; 49 USC 47508; 49 USC 47528 to 47531; 49 USC 47534 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final rule 12/31/2015

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The prohibition in 49 USC 47534 does not require the FAA to take any action. However, the FAA routinely incorporates these kinds of operational prohibitions into the regulations of 14 CFR so that operators have reference to all of the applicable noise requirements in one place. Similarly, when Congress allows the prohibition to be waived under certain circumstances, maintaining a list of those circumstances in 14 CFR and the means by which waivers may be requested is convenient for both affected operators and the FAA. Similar provisions were incorporated in part 91 following the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990, which limited operations of jets over 75,000 pounds (see 14 CR 91.853 and 91.858).Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 07/02/2013 78 FR 39576

Comment Period End 08/01/2013

Final Rule Effective 09/03/2013
Final Rule; Disposition of Comments 09/20/2013 78 FR 57790

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2120- AJ76; Related to 2120- AJ96 Agency Contact: Sandy Liu
Office of Environment and Energy Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave, sw, Washington, DC 20591 Washington , DC 20591
Phone: 202 493-4864

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) RIN: 2125-AF24

View Related Documents

Title: National Tunnel Inspection Standards (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would revise 23 CFR part 650--Bridges, Structures, and Hydraulics, by adding the National Tunnel Inspection Standards (NTIS) under subpart E. We anticipate that the NTIS may be modeled after the existing National Bridge Inspection Standards and may include requirements for, among other things, inspection procedures, the qualifications and training of inspectors, and a National Tunnel Inventory. The FHWA has changed the stage from a final rule to a SNPRM because MAP-21 broadened FHWA ́s authority to include all highway tunnels. In addition, it made a number of changes to the NBIS, upon which this rulemaking is based. In order to conform the two processes and to reassess the cost benefit analysis of this rulemaking, a supplemental NPRM is being pursued.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 650 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 1111, MAP- 21 (PL 112-141); 23 USC 116; 49 CFR 1.48(b) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory section 1111, MAP -21 (Pub. L. 112-141) 10/01/2015

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The purpose of this supplemental NPRM is to solicit comments concerning the establishment of the National Tunnel Inspection Standards (NTIS) for all highway tunnels and notify the public of changes required by section 1111 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) (Pub. L. 112-141). Routine and thorough inspections of our Nation's tunnels are necessary to maintain safe tunnel operation and prevent structural, geotechnical, and functional failures. In addition, data on the condition and operation of our Nation's tunnels is necessary in order for tunnel owners to make informed investment decisions as part of an asset management program for maintenance and repair of their tunnels. Recognizing that the safety and security of our Nation's tunnels are of paramount importance, and building on the recommendations of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), State DOTs, the Department of Transportation Inspector General (IG), the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and many research projects, FHWA has developed the NTIS.

Legal Basis: Section 1111 of MAP -21 requires the Secretary of Transportation to establish and maintain inspection standards for the proper inspection and evaluation of all highway tunnels for safety and serviceability.Alternatives: N/A

Costs and Benefits: Preliminary estimates show that the total aggregate annual cost increase estimate for the three tunnel owners not currently inspecting at the proposed interval is between $188,000 (low) and $2.8 million (high). The one-day closure of the Hampton Roads Bridge resulted in over $5 million in costs. The overall economic impact of the Central Artery Tunnel collapse was at least $142 million. If the NTIS were to prevent an incident of a similar magnitude, the benefits of this rule would justify its costs as both of these sums are much greater than the estimated $188,000 - $2.8 million aggregate cost increase to inspect tunnels more frequently. In addition, the annual benefit from just one fatality prevented could be as high as $420,000 per year. When comparing the economic impact of one-day tunnel closures and the likely reductions in fatalities and non-fatal injuries to the additional costs associated with 3 tunnel owners inspecting their tunnel facilities more frequently, the benefits of the rule clearly justify its costs.

Risks: N/A

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 11/18/2008 73 FR 68365

ANPRM Comment Period End 02/17/2009

NPRM 07/22/2010 75 FR 42643

NPRM Comment Period End 09/20/2010
Supplemental NPRM 07/30/2013 78 FR 46118

Second NPRM Comment Period End 09/30/2013 78 FR 46118
Analyzing Comments 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Jesus Rohena Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-4593
E-Mail: jesus.rohena@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) RIN: 2125-AF49

View Related Documents

Title: National Goals and Performance Management Measures (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would create national performance management measures and standards to be used by the States to meet the national transportation goals identified in section 1203 of MAP-21. This rulemaking would also establish the process to be used by States to set performance targets that reflect their performance measures. The FHWA anticipates publishing up to three separate rulemakings to address the different areas covered by this section. This rulemaking, the first, will cover safety.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 23 USC 150 Legal Deadline: Section 1203 of MAP -21 requires the Secretary to promulgate a rulemaking within 18 months after the date of

enactment.

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory NPRM 04/01/2014

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) transforms the Federal-aid highway program by establishing new requirements for performance management to ensure the most efficient investment of Federal transportation funds. Performance management refocuses attention on national transportation goals, increases the accountability and transparency of the Federal-aid highway program, and improves project decisionmaking through performance-based planning and programming. This rulemaking is the first of three that would propose the establishment of performance measures for State DOTs and MPOs to use to carry out Federal-aid highway programs and to assess performance in each of the 12 areas mandated by MAP-21. This rulemaking would establish performance measures to carry out the Highway Safety Improvement Program and to assess serious injuries and fatalities, both in number and expressed as a rate, on all public roads. In addition, this rulemaking would establish the process for State DOTs and MPOs to use to establishand report safety targets, and the process that FHWA will use to assess progress State DOTs have made in achieving safety targets.

Legal Basis: Section 1203 of MAP -21 requires the Secretary of Transportation to establish performance measures and standards through a rulemaking to assess performance in 12 areas.

Alternatives: N/A

Costs and Benefits: Preliminary estimates show that the total costs for a 10-year period is $66,695,260 (undiscounted), $53,873,609 (7 percent discount rate), and $60,504,205 (3 percent discount rate). The DOT performed a break-even analysis that estimates the number of fatalities and incapacitating injuries the rule would need to prevent for the benefits of the rule to justify the costs. Preliminary estimates show that the proposed rule would need to prevent approximately 7 fatalities over 10 years, or less than one avoided fatality per year nationwide, to outweigh the anticipated costs of the proposed rule. When the break-even analysis uses incapacitating injuries as the reduction metric, preliminary estimates show that the proposed rule must be responsible for reducing approximately 153 incapacitating injuries over 10 years, or approximately 15 per year, to outweigh the anticipated costs of the proposed rule. In other words, the proposed rule must result in approximately 7 fewer fatalities, which is equivalent to approximately 153 fewer incapacitating injuries, over 10 years, for the proposed rule to be cost-beneficial.

Risks: N/A

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Francine Shaw-Whitson Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8028
E-Mail: Francine.Shaw-whitson@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) RIN: 2125-AF50

View Related Documents

Title: Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program (MAP-21)

Abstract: MAP-21 amends section 327 of title 23 U.S.C. to make the Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program a permanent option for all States, adds multimodal projects, authorizes the use of Federal funds for related legal fees, and limits the renewable option to a period of five years. This rulemaking will amend 23 CFR part 773 to conform with MAP-21. This is a joint rulemaking with FTA and FRA.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 773 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 23 USC 327, sec 1113 of MAP-21 (PL 112-141) Legal Deadline: Section 1313(c)(2) modifies 23 USC 327(c) to require the Secretary promulgate a rulemaking within 270 days
from the date of enactment.

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory MAP-21 section 1313 requires the Secretary to amend its regulations at 23 CFR 773 to reflect the changes made therein. 06/28/2013

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Carol Braegelmann Department of TransportationFederal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 1701
E-Mail: carol.braegelmann@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) RIN: 2125-AF52

View Related Documents

Title: Statewide and Nonmetropolitan Transportation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation Planning (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would propose amendments to the regulation 23 CFR part 450 and 49 CFR part 613 under which the FHWA and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) respectively administer the Metropolitan Transportation Planning program authorized by 23 USC 134 and 49 USC section 5303 and the Statewide Non-Metropolitan Transportation Planning program authorized by 23 USC 135 and 49 USC 5304. Sections 1201 and 1202 of MAP-21 replace 23 USC 134 and 135, to require a continuing, comprehensive, and coordinated transportation planning and programming process in metropolitan areas, nonmetropolitan areas, and Statewide.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 450; 23 CFR 500; 49 CFR 613 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 1201, 1202, 1310, and 1320, PL 112-141 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Harlan Miller Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 0847
E-Mail: Harlan.Miller@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) RIN: 2125-AF53

View Related Documents

Title: National Goals and Performance Management Measures (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would create national performance management measures and standards to be used by the States to meet the national transportation goals identified in section 1203 of MAP-21. This rulemaking would also establish the process to be used by States to set performance targets that reflect their performance measures. The FHWA anticipates issuing up to three rulemakings in this area. This rulemaking, number two, will cover the bridges and pavement.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 1203 PL 112 -141; 49 CFR 1.85 Legal Deadline: Section 1203 of MAP -21 requires the Secretary to promulgate a rulemaking within 18 months after the date of

enactment.

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory NPRM 04/01/2014

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) transforms the Federal-aid highwayprogram by establishing new requirements for performance management to ensure the most efficient investment of Federal transportation funds. Performance management refocuses attention on national transportation goals, increases the accountability and transparency of the Federal-aid highway program, and improves project decisionmaking through performance-based planning and programming. This rulemaking is the second of three that would propose the establishment of performance measures for State DOTs and MPOs to use to carry out Federal-aid highway programs and to assess performance in each of the 12 areas mandated by MAP-21. This rulemaking would establish performance measures for State DOTs to use to carry out the National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) and to assess: condition of pavements on the National Highways System (NHS) (excluding the Interstate System), condition of pavements on the Interstate System, and condition of bridges on the NHS. This rulemaking would also propose: the definitions that will be applicable to the new 23 CFR 490; the process to be used by State DOTs and MPOs to establish performance targets that reflect the measures proposed in this rulemaking; a methodology to be used to assess State DOTs compliance with the target achievement provision specified under 23 U.S.C. 119(e)(7); and the process to be followed by State DOTs to report on progress towards the achievement of pavement and bridge condition-related performance targets.

Legal Basis: Section 1203 of MAP -21 requires the Secretary of Transportation to establish performance measures and standards through a rulemaking to assess performance in 12 areas.

Alternatives: N/A

Costs and Benefits: Not Yet Determined

Risks: N/A

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Francine Shaw-Whitson Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8028
E-Mail: Francine.Shaw-whitson@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) RIN: 2125-AF54

View Related Documents

Title: National Goals and Performance Management Measures (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would create national performance management measures and standards to be used by the States to meet the national transportation goals identified in section 1203 of MAP-21. This rulemaking would also establish the process to be used by States to set performance targets that reflect their performance measures. The FHWA anticipates issuing up to three rulemakings in this area. This rulemaking covers Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) and Freight issues.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 1203, PL 112 -141; 49 FR 1.85. Legal Deadline: Section 1203 of MAP -21 requires the Secretary to promulgate a rulemaking within 18 months after the date of

enactment.

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory NPRM 04/01/2014

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) transforms the Federal-aid highway program by establishing new requirements for performance management to ensure the most efficient investment of Federal transportation funds. Performance management refocuses attention on national transportation goals, increases the accountability and transparency of the Federal-aid highway program, and improves project decisionmaking through performance-based planning and programming. This rulemaking is the third of three that would propose the establishment of performance measures for State DOTs and MPOs to use to carry out Federal-aid highway programs and to assess performance in each of the 12 areas mandated by MAP-21. This rulemaking would establish performance measures for StateDOTs to use in the areas of Congestion Reduction, Congestion mitigation and air quality improvement program (CMAQ), Freight, and Performance of Interstate/Non-Interstate National Highway System.

Legal Basis: Section 1203 of MAP -21 requires the Secretary of Transportation to establish performance measures and standards through a rulemaking to assess performance in 12 areas.

Alternatives: N/A

Costs and Benefits: Not Yet Determined

Risks: N/A

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Francine Shaw-Whitson Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8028
E-Mail: Francine.Shaw-whitson@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) RIN: 2125-AF55

View Related Documents

Title: National Bridge Inspection Standards (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would update 23 CFR part 650, subpart C, National Bridge Inspection Standards, to incorporate changes made by section 1111 of MAP-21. This rulemaking would also update this subpart to provide clarification of the requirements related to complex structures, critical findings, and inspection intervals.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 650 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 1111, PL 112 -141; 49 CFR 1.85 Legal Deadline: MAP-21 requires the Secretary of Transportation to update inspection standards not later than 3 years after
the date of enactment.

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule 10/01/2015

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Gary Moss Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 4654
E-Mail: Gary.Moss@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) RIN: 2125-AF56View Related Documents

Title: Highway Safety Improvement Program (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would update 23 CFR 924 to incorporate changes made by MAP-21. Specifically, MAP-21 removed the requirement for States to prepare a Transparency Report, removed the High Risk Rural Roads set-aside, and removed the 10 percent flexibility provision for States to use safety funding in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148(e). MAP-21 also adds data system and improvement requirements, State Strategic Highway Safety Plan update requirements, special rules, and State performance targets.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 924 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 1112, PL 112 -141; 49 CFR 1.85 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Karen Scurry Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 840 Bear Tavern Road, Suite 202, West Trenton, NJ 08628 West Trenton , NJ 08628
Phone: 609-637- 4207
E-Mail: Karen.Scurry@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) RIN: 2125-AF57

View Related Documents

Title: Risk-Based Asset Management Plan (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would establish a process for the development of a State risk-based asset management plan in accordance with section 1106 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). This rulemaking would define a process for developing asset management plans that lead to a strategic program of projects that would make progress toward achievement of the States ́ targets for asset condition and performance of the National Highway System in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 150(d) and support the progress toward the achievement of the national goals identified in 23 U.S.C. 150(b). This rulemaking would also define the minimum standards for States to use in developing and operating highway bridge and pavement management systems required under 23 U.S.C. 150(c)(3)(A)(i).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 515 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 1106 of MAP -21, 23 USC 150 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory NPRM 04/01/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Steve Gaj Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-1559

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) RIN: 2125-AF58

View Related Documents

Title: Design Build Alternative Technical Concepts

Abstract: The FHWA proposes to revise its regulatory provisions in 23 CFR 636 to encourage wider use of alternative technical concepts in design-build project delivery. Specifically, 23 CFR 636.209(b) will be revised to allow proposers to submit technical and price proposals based on their preapproved alternate technical concepts without submitting a base proposal. The current policy requires allows the use of supplemental alternative technical concept proposals but not as a substitute for base proposals that respond to the Request for Proposal solicitation requirements.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 636 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/01/2013 78 FR 46546

NPRM Comment Period End 09/30/2013 78 FR 46546
Analyzing Comments 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Jill Laptosky Regulation and Enforcement Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-1562
E-Mail: jill.laptosky@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) RIN: 2125-AF59

View Related Documents

Title: Additional Categorical Exclusions under NEPA (MAP-21)

Abstract: Under MAP-21, section 1318, the Department of Transportation was mandated to survey categorical exclusions (CE) use on transportation projects since 2005, and to solicit requests from transit agencies and State departments of transportation for new CEs. This rulemaking pertains to the new categorical exclusions; FHWA and FTA are proposing to add CEs to its environmental regulations (23 CFR 771) in order to comply with MAP-21, as well as to improve the efficiency of the environmental review process. The additional CEs make the least intensive form of review available for those actions that typically do not have the potential for significant environmental effects, and, therefore, do not merit additional analysis and documentation associated with an environmental assessment (EA) or an environmental impact statement (EIS). This provision also allows for the transfer of some existing CEs from subsection (d) of 23 CFR 771.117 to subsection (c) of that section.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 771 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 1318 PL 112 -141 (126 Stat 405) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date
MAP-21 section 1318 requires the publication of an NPRM within 120NPRM Statutory days of the effective date of MAP-21. 01/29/2013

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/19/2013 78 FR 57587

NPRM Comment Period End 11/18/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Duplicate of 2132- AB14 Related Agencies: Joint: FTA Agency Contact: Owen Lindauer Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 2655
E-Mail: Owen.Lindauer@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) RIN: 2125-AF61

View Related Documents

Title: Construction Manager, General Contractor (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would update FHWA regulations to reflect statutory language in section 1303 of MAP-21 allowing two-phase contracting to a construction manager or general contractor for preconstruction and construction services.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Sec 1303 PL 112 -141 (126 Stat 405) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Gerald Yakowenko Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 1562
E-Mail: gerald.yakowenko@fhwa.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) RIN: 2125-AF62

View Related Documents

Title: Acquisition of Right-of-Way (RRR; MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would update 23 CFR 710 to conform with MAP-21. Section 1302 of MAP-21 amends 23 U.S.C. 108 to provide States with new flexibility for reimbursements of costs of State-funded acquisitions of interests in real property incurred before completion of the NEPA environmental review process for the entire project. MAP-21 also allows the Secretary to authorize a State to use Federal funds for early acquisition of a real property interest if certain conditions are met, including completion of the NEPA environmental review process for the acquisition only.Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 710 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 1302 PL 112 -141 (126 Stat 405) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Arnold Feldman Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 2028
E-Mail: Arnold.Feldman@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) RIN: 2125-AF63

View Related Documents

Title: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would implement section 1113(b)(6) of MAP-21. That section requires priority use of Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program funds in areas that are designated nonattainment or maintenance for fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards under the Clean Air Act. That section did not specify the values to be applied to determine the weighted population. This rulemaking would establish the appropriate weighting factor for determining the weighted population of a PM 2.5 nonattainment area.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 23 USC 149; 49 CFR 1.85 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Cecilia Ho Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 9862
E-Mail: Cecilia.Ho@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) RIN: 2125-AF64

View Related Documents

Title: Value Engineering

Abstract: This rulemaking will update 23 CFR part 627 to implement the changes made by section 1503 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). The general intent and requirements of the Value Engineering (VE) regulationwill remain the same. Specific changes to the regulation include: specifying that a VE analysis is required for each project on the National Highway System (NHS) with an estimated total project cost of $50 million or more that utilizes Federal-aid highway funding; specifying that a VE analysis is required for each bridge project on the NHS with an estimated total project cost of $40 million or more that utilizes Federal-aid highway funding; removing the VE analysis requirement for bridges off the NHS; clarifying that a VE analysis is no longer required for projects delivered using the design build method of construction; and clarifying when a VE analysis should be conducted on projects delivered using the Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) method of contracting.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 627 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 23 USC 106; sec 1503 of MAP-21 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/29/2013 78 FR 53380

NPRM Comment Period End 10/28/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Jon Obenberger Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 2221
E-Mail: jon.obenberger@fhwa.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) RIN: 2125-AF44

View Related Documents

Title: Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service Contracts (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would revise and update regulations governing the procurement, management, and administration of engineering and design related services directly related to a highway construction project and reimbursed with Federal-aid highway program funding. To comply with statutory amendments, this rulemaking would remove all references to alternative or equivalent procedures contained in the existing regulations. This rulemaking proposes to revise existing small purchase procurement procedures to reflect an increase in the Federal threshold. This rulemaking would also address certain findings and recommendations contained in a 2008 Government Accountability Office regarding increased State DOT reliance on consultants and a 2009 DOT Office of the Inspector General audit regarding consultant indirect costs. This rulemaking would clarify existing Federal requirements in support of enhancing consistency with other Federal laws and applicable regulations and addressing evolutions in industry practices to improve the procurement, management, and administration of consultant services.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 172 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 23 USC 106, 112, 114(a), 302, 315, and 402; 40 USC 1101; 49 CFR 1.48(b) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/04/2012 77 FR 53802

Comment Period End 11/05/2012

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Additional Information: SB - No; IC - No; SLT - No. Actual or Target Completion Date - An NPRM was published on 9/4/12 at 77 FR 53902. Progress Updates and Anticipated Accomplishments - An NPRM has been published. Anticipated savings in costs and/or information collection burdens, together with any anticipated changes in benefits - The proposed changes to part 172 will provide additional clarification, guidance, and flexibility to stakeholders implementing these regulations. As these proposed amendments are required by changes in authorizing legislation, other applicable regulations, and industry practices, the FHWA anticipates that the economic impact of this rulemaking would be minimal. Notes - None.Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Scott Wolf Department of Transportation

Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 1332
E-Mail: scott.wolf@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA ) RIN: 2125-AF48

View Related Documents

Title: Environmental Impact and Related Procedures (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would change FTA and FHWA joint procedures that implement NEPA. It would add two new categorical exclusions under 23 CFR 771.117(c) for actions eligible for assistance under title 23, within an existing operational right-of-way and actions with limited Federal assistance as described in section 1316 and 1317 of MAP-21, respectively.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 771; 49 CFR 622 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 1316 and 1317 of MAP-21 (PL 112-141) Legal Deadline: MAP-21 requires the secretary to promulgate regulations within 150 days of the date of enactment for section

1316.

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory NPRM 02/28/2013

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/28/2013 78 FR 13609

NPRM Comment Period End 04/29/2013 78 FR 13609

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Merge with 2132- AB05 Related Agencies: Joint: FTA Agency Contact: Kreig Larson Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-2056
E-Mail: kreig.larson@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB11

View Related Documents

Title: Carrier Safety Fitness Determination

Abstract: FMCSA proposes to amend the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) to adopt revised methodologies that would result in a safety fitness determination (SFD). The proposed methodologies would determine when a motor carrier is not fit to operate commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in or affecting interstate commerce based on (1) the carrier’s performance in relation to five of the Agency’s Behavioral Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories (BASICs); (2) an investigation; or (3) a combination of on-road safety data and investigation information. The intended effect of this action is to reduce crashes caused by CMV drivers and motor carriers, resulting in death, injuries, and property damage on U.S. highways, by more effectively using FMCSA data and resources to identify unfit motor carriers and to remove them from the Nation’s roadways.Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 385 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 4009 of TEA -21 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Because of the time and expense associated with the onsite compliance review, only a small fraction of carriers (approximately 12,000) receive a safety fitness determination each year. Since the current safety fitness determination process is based exclusively on the results of an onsite compliance review, the great majority of carriers subject to FMCSA jurisdiction do not receive a timely determination of their safety fitness. The proposed methodology for determining motor carrier safety fitness should correct the deficiencies of the current process. In correcting these deficiencies, FMCSA has made a concerted effort to develop a "transparent" method for the Safety Fitness Determination (SFD) that would allow each motor carrier to understand fully how FMCSA established that carrier's specific SFD.

Legal Basis: This rule is based primarily on the authority of 49 U.S.C. 31144, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to "determine whether an owner or operator is fit to operate a commercial motor vehicle" and to "maintain by regulation a procedure for determining the safety fitness of an owner or operator." This statute was first enacted as part of the Motor Carrier Safety Act of 1984, section 215, Public Law 98-554, 98 Stat. 2844 (Oct. 30, 1984). The proposed rule also relies on the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 31133, which gives the Secretary "broad administrative powers to assist in the implementation" of the provisions of the Motor Carrier Safety Act now found in chapter 311 of title 49, U.S.C. These powers include, among others, authority to conduct inspections and investigations, compile statistics, require production of records and property, prescribe recordkeeping and reporting requirements, and to perform other acts considered appropriate. These powers are used to obtain the data used by the Safety Management System and by the proposed new methodology for safety fitness determinations. Under 49 CFR 1.73(g), the Secretary has delegated the authority to carry out the functions in subchapters I, III, and IV of chapter 311, title 49, U.S.C., to the FMCSA Administrator. Sections 31133 and 31144 are part of subchapter III of chapter 311.

Alternatives: The Agency has been considering several alternatives.

Costs and Benefits: The Agency is continuing to review the estimated costs and benefits of the proposed rule.

Risks: A risk of incorrectly identifying a compliant carrier as non-compliant—and consequently subjecting the carrier to unnecessary expenses—has been analyzed and has been found to be negligible under the process being proposed.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business; Organizations Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: David Miller Regulatory Development Division Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 5370
E-Mail: fmcsaregs@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB18

View Related Documents

Title: Commercial Driver's License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would create a central database for verified positive controlled substances and alcohol test results for commercial driver ́s license (CDL) holders and refusals by such drivers to submit to testing. This rulemaking would require employers of CDL holders and service agents to report positive test results and refusals to test into the Clearinghouse. Prospective employers, acting on an application for a CDL driver position with the applicant ́s written consent to access the Clearinghouse, would query the Clearinghouse to determine if any specific information about the driver applicant is in the Clearinghouse before allowing the applicant to be hired and to drive CMVs. This rulemaking is intended to increase highway safety by ensuring CDL holders, who have tested positive or have refused to submit to testing, have completed the U.S. DOT ́s return-to-duty process before driving CMVs in interstate or intrastate commerce. It is also intended to ensure that employers aremeeting their drug and alcohol testing responsibilities. Additionally, provisions in this rulemaking would also be responsive to requirements of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act. MAP-21 requires creation of the Clearinghouse by 10/1/14.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 382 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 31306 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rulemaking would improve the safety of the Nation's highways by ensuring that employers know when drivers test positive for drugs and/or alcohol and are not qualified to drive. It would also ensure that drivers who have tested positive and have not completed the return to duty process are not driving and ensure that all employers are meeting their drug and alcohol testing responsibilities.

Legal Basis: Section 32402 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)) (Pub.L. 112-141, 126 stat. 405) directs the Secretary of Transportation to establish a national clearinghouse for controlled substance and alcohol test results of commercial motor vehicle operators. In addition, FMCSA has general authority to promulgate safety standards, including those governing drivers' use of drugs or alcohol while operating a CMV. The Motor Carrier Safety Act of 1984 Public Law 98-554 (the 1984 Act) provides authority to regulate drivers, motor carriers, and vehicle equipment and requires the Secretary of Transportation to prescribe minimum safety standards for CMVs, including: (1) CMVs are maintained, equipped loaded, and operated safely; (2) the responsibilities imposed on CMV operators do not impair their ability to operate the vehicles safely; (30 the physical condition of CMV operators is adequate to enable them to operate the vehicles safely; and (40 CMV operation does not have a deleterious effect on physical condition of the operators (49 USC 31136(a)).

Alternatives: To be determined.

Costs and Benefits: The Agency estimates $187 million in annual benefits from increased crash reduction from the rule. This is against an estimated $155 million in total annual costs for employers to complete the annual and pre-employment queries and to designate C/TPAs, for SAPs to input information from drivers undergoing the return-to-duty process, for various entities to report and notify positive tests and to register and become familiar with the rule, for drivers to consent to release of records, and for FMCSA to maintain and operate the Clearinghouse, and for drivers to go through the return-to-duty process. Total net benefits of the rule thus are $32 million annually.

Risks: A risk of not knowing when a driver has not completed the "return to duty" process and enabling job-hopping within the industry.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Additional Information: MAP-21 included provisions for a Drug and Alcohol Test Clearinghouse that affect this rulemaking.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Deborah Snider Chief, Commercial Enforcement (MC-ECC) Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-0916
E-Mail: deborah.snider@fmcsa.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB20

View Related Documents

Title: Electronic Logging Devices and Hours of Service Supporting Documents (MAP-21)

Abstract: This SNPRM would establish: (1) minimum performance and design standards for hours-of-service (HOS) electronic logging devices (ELDs); (2) requirements for the mandatory use of these devices by drivers currently required to prepare HOS records of duty status (RODS); (3) requirements concerning HOS supporting documents; and (4) measures to address concernsabout harassment resulting from the mandatory use of ELDs. This rulemaking supplements the Agency’s February 1, 2011, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and addresses issues raised by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in its 2011 decision vacating the Agency’s April 5, 2010, final rule concerning ELDs as well as subsequent statutory developments. The proposed requirements for ELDs would improve compliance with the HOS rules.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 350; 49 CFR 385; 49 CFR 396; 49 CFR 395 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 31502; 31136(a); Pub. L 103.311; 49 USC 31137(a) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial NPRM published. 01/31/2011

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) proposes amendments to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) to establish: (1) minimum performance and design standards for hours-of-service (HOS) electronic logging devices (ELDs); (2) requirements for the mandatory use of these devices by drivers currently required to prepare HOS records of duty status (RODS); (3) requirements concerning HOS supporting documents; and (4) measures to address concerns about harassment resulting from the mandatory use of ELDs. This rulemaking supplements the Agency's February 1, 2011, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and addresses issues raised by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in its 2011 decision vacating the Agency's April 5, 2010, final rule concerning ELDs as well as subsequent statutory developments. The proposed requirements for ELDs would improve compliance with the HOS rules.

Legal Basis: Section 113 of the Hazardous Materials Transportation Authorization Act of 1994, Public Law 103-311, 108 Stat. 1673, 16776-1677, August 26, 1994, (HMTAA) requires the Secretary to prescribe regulations to improve compliance by CMV drivers and motor carriers with HOS requirements and the effectiveness and efficiency of Federal and State enforcement officers reviewing such compliance. Specifically, the Act addresses requirements for supporting documents. Section 32301(b) of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Enhancement Act, enacted as part of MAP-21 (Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 786-788 (July 6, 2012)), mandated that the Secretary adopt regulations requiring that CMVs involved in interstate commerce, operated by drivers who are required to keep RODS, be equipped with ELDs.

Alternatives: FMCSA is considering several alternatives to the proposal, including alternate populations.

Costs and Benefits: FMCSA has not yet fully assessed the costs and benefits that might be associated with this SNPRM. The 2011 NPRM estimated total costs and benefits. At a 7 percent discount, the total estimated cost over 10 years was $1,984 million, and the total estimated benefit over 10 years was $2,699 million.

Risks: FMCSA has not yet fully assessed the risks that might be associated with this activity.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/01/2011 76 FR 5537

NPRM Comment Period End 02/28/2011

Comment Period Extended 03/10/2011 76 FR 13121

Extended Comment Period End 05/23/2011
Supplemental NPRM 12/00/2013

Additional Information: The Agency previously published an NPRM on this subject under RIN 2126-AA76, "Hours of Service of Drivers; Supporting Documents" (63 FR 19457, Apr. 20, 1998) and an SNPRM, "Hours of Service of Drivers: Supporting Documents" (69 FR 63997, Nov. 3, 2004). The Agency withdrew the SNPRM on October 25, 2007, 72 FR 60614. The previous proceeding can be found in docket No. FMCSA-1998-3706.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2126- AA89; Related to 2126- AA76 Agency Contact: Deborah M Freund
Senior Transportation Specialist Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-5370
E-Mail: deborah.freund@dot.govDepartment of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB44

View Related Documents

Title: Lease and Interchange of Vehicles; Motor Carriers of Passengers

Abstract: The rulemaking would adopt regulations governing the lease and interchange of passenger vehicles to: (1) identify the motor carrier operating a bus or motorcoach and responsible for compliance with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations; (2) ensure that a lessor surrenders control of the vehicle for the full term of the lease or temporary exchange of vehicles and drivers; and (3) require motor carriers subject to a prohibition on operating in interstate commerce to notify FMCSA in writing before leasing or otherwise transferring control of their vehicles to other carriers.. This action is necessary to ensure that unsafe passenger carriers cannot evade FMCSA oversight and enforcement by operating under the authority of another carrier that exercises no actual control over those operations. This action will ensure that FMCSA, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), and our State partners are able to identify motor carriers transporting passengers in interstate commerce and correctly assign responsibility for regulatory violations during inspections, compliance investigations, and crash studies. It also provides the general public with the means to identify the responsible motor carrier at the time of transportation. While detailed lease and interchange regulations for cargo-carrying vehicles have been in effect since 1950, this rulemaking for passenger-carrying CMVs would focus entirely on operational safety.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 376; 49 CFR 390 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 31502; 49 USC 13301; 49 USC 31136 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/20/2013 78 FR 57822

NPRM Comment Period End 11/19/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business; Organizations Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: David Miller Regulatory Development Division Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 5370
E-Mail: fmcsaregs@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB46

View Related Documents

Title: Inspection, Repair, and Maintenance; Driver-Vehicle Inspection Report (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would rescind the requirement that commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers operating in interstate commerce submit, and motor carriers retain, driver-vehicle inspection reports when the driver has neither found nor been made aware of any vehicle defects or deficiencies. Specifically, this rulemaking would remove a significant information collection burden without adversely impacting safety. This rulemaking responds in part to the President ́s January 2012 Regulatory
Review and Reform initiative.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 396 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 31502(b) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/07/2013 78 FR 48125

NPRM Comment Period End 10/00/2014

Additional Information: SB - Y, IC - Y; SLT - N Costs/Benefits - This rule is expected to reduce paperwork costs by $1.7 billion annually.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Sean Gallagher
MC- PRR Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-3740
E-Mail: sean.gallagher@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB56

View Related Documents

Title: MAP-21 Enhancements to the Unified Registration System (MAP-21)

Abstract: In accordance with section 32106 of MAP-21, which removed a cap of $300 for registration, this rule would establish a new registration fee and incorporate other registration provisions of MAP-21.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 390 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: PL 112-141, 126 Stat 777 July 6, 2012 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions; Organizations Federalism: Undetermined

Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2126- AA22 Agency Contact: Genevieve Sapir Management Analyst Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Office of Policy (MC-CCR), 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-7056
E-Mail: genevieve.sapir@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB57

View Related Documents

Title: Prohibition of Coercion (MAP-21)Abstract: Section 32911 of MAP-21 amended 49 U.S.C. section 31136(a) to require that regulations governing commercial motor vehicle safety "ensure ... an operator of a commercial motor vehicle is not coerced by a motor carrier, shipper, receiver, or transportation intermediary to operate a commercial vehicle in violation of a regulation promulgated under 49 U.S.C. section 31136 or chapters 51 or 313 of title 49, U.S.C." The agency projects publication of this rulemaking action in early 2014. However, in rules where coercion would need to be considered, the Agency would cross reference its regulation on coercion.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 386; 49 CFR 390 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 32911 of MAP -21 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Charles Medalen Attorney Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 400 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-1354

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB61

View Related Documents

Title: Definition of Tank Vehicle with Respect to Commercial Driver's License Holders

Abstract: This rule would revise the definition of “tank vehicle” with respect to the applicability of the requirement for certain commercial driver’s license (CDL) holders to obtain an endorsement to operate tank vehicles. On May 9, 2011, FMCSA published the “Commercial Driver’s License Testing and Commercial Learner’s Permit Standards” final rule. As a result of the rulemaking, FMCSA received numerous petitions regarding the definition of a “tank vehicle” found in 49 CFR 383.5. The new definition of “tank vehicle” became effective on July 11, 2011, and required additional drivers to secure tank vehicle endorsements on their commercial learners’ permits (CLPs) and CDLs. This rulemaking responds to those petitions by seeking public comment on a proposed revision of the definition and the impacts this revised definition would have on the industry.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 383 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986; Motor Carrier Act of 1935; Motor Carrier Safety Act of 1984; Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for U; Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century; 49 USC 31136; 49 USC 31302; 49 USC 31305; 49 USC 31308; 49 USC 31309; 49 USC 31502 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/26/2013 78 FR 59328

NPRM Comment Period End 11/25/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2126- AB02 Agency Contact: Sean Gallagher
MC- PRR Department of TransportationFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-3740
E-Mail: sean.gallagher@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB63

View Related Documents

Title: Heavy Vehicle Speed Limiters

Abstract: This joint rulemaking with NHTSA would respond to petitions from ATA and Roadsafe America to require the installation of speed limiting devices on heavy trucks. In response to the petitions, NHTSA requested public comment on the subject and received thousands of comments supporting the petitioner ́s request. This rulemaking would consider a new Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard that would require the installation of speed limiting devices on heavy trucks. We believe this rule would have minimal cost, as all heavy trucks already have these devices installed, although some vehicles do not have the limit set. This rule would decrease the estimated 1,115 fatal crashes annually involving vehicles with a GVWR of over 11,793.4 kg (26,000 lbs) on roads with posted speed limits of 55 mph or above.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571, 393 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111, 30115, 30116, 30117, 322, and delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Related Agencies: Joint : NHTSA Agency Contact: Brian Routhier Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-1225
E-Mail: brian.routhier@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB42

View Related Documents

Title: Patterns of Safety Violations by Motor Carrier Management (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend FMCSA ́s regulations to enable the Agency to prevent interstate transportation by motor carriers that employ officers who have shown unusual and repeated disregard for safety compliance. The rulemaking would define conduct that constitutes a pattern or practice of avoiding compliance or otherwise concealing noncompliance with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations. These revisions would implement certain provisions of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) and are designed to enhance the safety of commercial motor vehicle (CMV) operations on our nation ́s highways.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 385 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 31136 (a) and 31502(b) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory Final Rule 08/10/2006Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/13/2012 77 FR 67613

NPRM Comment Period End 01/14/2013

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Sean Gallagher
MC- PRR Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-3740
E-Mail: sean.gallagher@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AA95

View Related Documents

Title: Qualifications of Drivers; Diabetes Standard

Abstract: This rulemaking action would amend FMCSA ́s medical qualification standards to allow drivers with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus to operate commercial motor vehicles in interstate commerce, without seeking an exemption from the FMCSRs. This action is required by Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient, Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 391 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: PL 109-59 (2005), sec 4129 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory Initiate change 11/10/2005

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 03/17/2006 71 FR 13801

ANPRM Comment Period End 06/15/2006

NPRM 11/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket No. FMCSA- 2005-23151

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Elaine Papp Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-0421
E-Mail: elaine.papp@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB06

View Related DocumentsTitle: Minimum Training Requirements for Entry Level Commercial Motor Vehicle Operations (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would require behind-the-wheel and classroom training for persons who must hold a commercial driver ́s license to operate commercial motor vehicles. This action is in response to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ́s December 2005 decision remanding the May 21, 2004, Final Rule, "Minimum Training Requirements for Entry-Level Commercial Motor Vehicle Operators" to the Agency for further consideration. The rulemaking will consider the effectiveness of CMV driver training in reducing crashes, the appropriate types and levels of training that should be mandated, and related costs. Additionally, provisions in this rulemaking would also be responsive to requirements of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act. MAP-21 requires a final rule by October 1, 2013.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 380; 49 CFR 383; 49 CFR 384 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 31136; 49 CFR 1.73; 49 USC 31502 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory MAP-21 to issue final rule within 12 months of enactment 10/01/2013

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This action is in response to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ́s December 2005 decision remanding the May 21, 2004, Final Rule, "Minimum Training Requirements for Entry-Level Commercial Motor Vehicle Operators" to FMCSA for further consideration. The 2004 Final Rule was based on section 4007(a) of ISTEA, which directed DOT to undertake rulemaking on the need to require training of all entry-level drivers of commercial motor vehicles. The primary issue identified by the D.C. Circuit was the 2004 rule's failure to mandate any form of behind-the-wheel training.

Legal Basis: Section 4007(a) of ISTEA (Pub. L. 102-240, December 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 1914, 2151) directed the Secretary of Transportation to undertake rulemaking on the need to require training of all entry-level drivers of "commercial motor vehicles." The Agency published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking on this subject on June 21, 1993 (58 FR 33874), an NPRM on August 15, 2003 (68 FR 48863), and a final rule on May 21, 2004 (69 FR 29384). Three parties petitioned the D.C. Circuit for review of the 2004 rule. The court held that FMCSA had failed to consider important aspects of an adequate entry-level training program and remanded the rule to the Agency for further consideration (Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety v. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 429 F.3d 1136 (D.C. Cir. 2005)). The primary issue identified by the D.C. Circuit was the 2004 rule's failure to mandate any form of behind-the-wheel training.

Alternatives: The December 26, 2007, NPRM regarding entry-level driver training (72 FR 73226) discussed a wide variety of alternatives, such as the length of training to be provided, where the training must be obtained, etc. The NPRM asked 13 questions for comment regarding these alternatives.

Costs and Benefits: The NPRM for this rulemaking proposed a 3-year delay in implementation. Costs and benefits were projected for the delayed implementation period. Estimated annual costs ranged from $168 to $335 million. The "break even"point in cost/benefit was determined to be 8.5 fatal or 226 non-fatal crashes at the $168 million level, and 17 fatal or 452 nonfatal crashes at the $335 million level.

Risks: Although the D.C. Circuit's remand of the 2004 final rule on this topic clearly indicated the need to mandate behindthe-wheel training, FMCSA acknowledged in the NPRM that there are no reliable research studies or data that demonstrate the effect formal training would have in reducing crashes caused by a commercial motor vehicle driver. There is substantial opposition to the proposed rule due to costs to the industry absent any proof of effectiveness in reducing crashes.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule

NPRM 12/26/2007 72 FR 73226

NPRM Comment Period Extended 03/24/2008 73 FR 15471

NPRM Comment Period End 03/25/2008

NPRM Comment Period Extension End 05/23/2008

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2126- AA09 Agency Contact: Thomas Yager
Driver and Carrier Operations Division Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-4325E-Mail: tom.yager@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB17

View Related Documents

Title: New Entrant Safety Assurance Process: Implementation of Section 210(b) of the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act
of 1999

Abstract: This rulemaking would consider methods for ensuring a new applicant carrier is knowledgeable about the applicable safety requirements before being granted New Entrant authority. The agency is considering whether to implement a proficiency examination as part of its revised New Entrant Safety Assurance Process as well as other alternatives. This rulemaking responds to issues raised in a petition from Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety regarding new entrant applicant knowledge.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 385 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 113 Stat 1748 (1999); 49 USC 31144; PL 106-159, sec 210 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined

ANPRM 08/25/2009 74 FR 42833

ANPRM Comment Period End 10/26/2009

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2126- AA59 Agency Contact: Valerie Height Management Analyst Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Office of Policy (MC-PRR), 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-0901
E-Mail: valerie.height@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB40

View Related Documents

Title: Medical Examiner's Certification Integration (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would build upon the National Registry (2126-AA97) and Medical Certification (2126-AA10) final rules. This rulemaking would (1) require certified medical examiners (MEs) performing physical examinations on drivers of commercial motor vehicles (CMV) to use a newly developed Medical Examination Report (MER) Form; (2) require MEs to use a prescribed form for the medical examiner ́s certificate; (3) require MEs to report results of all completed commercial drivers ́ physical examinations (including the results of examinations where the driver was found not to be qualified) to FMCSA by close of business on the day of the examination; (4) transmit information from the Medical Examiner ́s Certificate electronically from the National Registry system to the State Driver Licensing Agencies (SDLAs);(5) transmit to the SDLAs information about Medical Examiner ́s Certificates that have been invalidated because a subsequent examination has found that the driver is not physically qualified; and (6) require the Agency to transmit medical variance information for such drivers electronically to the
SDLAs.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 383; 49 CFR 384; 49 CFR 390 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 31146; 49 USC 31149; 49 USC 31317 Legal Deadline: NoneTimetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined

NPRM 05/10/2013 78 FR 27343

NPRM Comment Period End 07/09/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Elaine Papp Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-0421
E-Mail: elaine.papp@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB47

View Related Documents

Title: Electronic Signatures (E-Signatures) (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would incorporate the principles of FMCSA ́s regulatory guidance concerning e-signatures by amending various sections of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) to enable the use of e-signatures in support of electronic recordkeeping. This would provide significant paperwork reductions and be less burdensome to the motor carrier industry than the paper records the Agency currently requires.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 390; 49 CFR 391; 49 CFR 395; 49 CFR 396; 49 CFR 379 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 31136; 49 USC 31502 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined

Additional Information: SB - Y; IC - Y, SLT - N Target date TBD

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Alan W Strasser
Office of Chief Counsel Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Room 8201, 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-0286
E-Mail: alan.strasser@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB49

View Related Documents

Title: Elimination of Redundant Maintenance Rule (RRR)

Abstract: The FMCSA would amend the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations to eliminate redundant inspection, repair, and maintenance requirements. Specifically, the FMCSA would amend the regulations to include within 49 CFR 396.3,concerning general maintenance rules, requirements that vehicles be properly lubricated and free of oil and grease leaks. Currently, the requirements addressing oil and grease leaks, and lubrication, are covered in a separate section. The Agency believes combining the requirements in a single section of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations would improve the clarity of the safety regulations and eliminate a redundancy in the maintenance rules.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 396.3 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 31136; 49 USC 31502 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined

Additional Information: SB - Y, IC - N, SLT - N Costs/Benefits - consolidating the regulations will have minimal benefit. Target

Date TBD.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Mike Huntley Chief, Vehicle and Roadside Operations Division Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-9209
E-Mail: michael.huntley@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AA22

View Related Documents

Title: Unified Registration System

Abstract: This rule would establish a new Unified Registration System (URS) to replace four legacy systems in support of FMCSA ́s safety and commercial oversight responsibilities. It would require all entities subject to FMCSA jurisdiction to comply with a new URS registration and biennial update requirement, disclose the cumulative registration information collected by URS, and provide a cross-reference to all regulatory requirements necessary to obtain permanent registration. It implements statutory provisions in the ICC Termination Act and SAFTEA-LU. URS would serve as a clearinghouse and depository of information on, and identification of, motor carriers, brokers, freight forwarders, and others required to register with the Department of Transportation.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 385; 49 CFR 360; 49 CFR 392; 49 CFR 365; 49 CFR 366; 49 CFR 368; 49 CFR 387; 49 CFR 390 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: PL 104-88; 109 Stat. 803, 888 (1995); 49 USC 13908; PL 109-159, sec 4304 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule (ICC Act) 01/01/1998

Other Statutory Final Rule (SAFETEA -LU) 08/10/2006

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: As a result of the ICC Termination Act of 1995 [Pub. L. 104-88, December 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 888] (ICCTA), Congress terminated the Interstate Commerce Commission and transferred its functions concerning licensing and financial responsibility requirements to DOT. Congress mandated that the Agency consider unifying the four current systems with a single, on-line Federal system.

Legal Basis: The ICCTA created a new 49 U.S.C. 13908 directing "[t]he Secretary, in cooperation with the States, and after notice and opportunity for public comment," . . . to "issue regulations to replace the current DOT identification number system, the single State registration system under section 14504, the registration system contained in this chapter, and the financialresponsibility information system under section 13906 with a single, on-line, Federal system."

Alternatives: FMCSA considered several alternatives to the proposal discussed here, in an effort to minimize the potential new filing burden on small entities which comprise 80 percent of motor carriers. For instance, we considered exempting existing carriers from certain new filing requirements (via a grandfather clause), with the view that it would minimize the compliance costs of this proposal. However, while reducing compliance costs (and thereby improving filing efficiency), it would also reduce, not enhance, the fairness of the motor carrier registration process relative to the status quo by placing higher burdens on new entrants than existing carriers. As such, it would act as a barrier to entry to small new entrants to the benefit of existing carriers. Conversely, we also considered exempting new entrants from these requirements, but dismissed this on the grounds that it too would reduce the fairness of the registration process. Additionally, either option would reduce safety relative to the proposal discussed here. The agency also considered removing the process agent designation filing requirement on the grounds that it was the most costly of the initiatives in this proposal. However, the agency dismissed this option because FMCSA division administrators felt that this particular filing requirement had the best potential to increase industry safety by improving the productivity of the agency's safety investigators (thereby allowing them to initiate additional compliance reviews). Additionally, the process agent designation filing requirement also enhances the fairness of the agency's registration process.

Costs and Benefits: The regulatory evaluation for the NPRM is in the docket.

Risks: The proposed rule is intended to streamline the registration process and ensure that FMCSA can more efficiently track CMVs and ensure their safe operation. The Unified Registration System imposes no operational responsibilities on drivers. Therefore, the proposed regulation would not impair a driver's ability to operate vehicles safely; would not impact the physical condition of drivers; and would not have a deleterious effect on the physical condition of drivers, in accordance with the statutory mandate of 49 U.S.C. 31136 (a).

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 08/26/1996 61 FR 43816

ANPRM Comment Period End 10/25/1996

NPRM 05/19/2005 70 FR 28990

NPRM Comment Period End 08/17/2005
Supplemental NPRM 10/26/2011 76 FR 66506

Comment Period End 12/27/2011

Final Rule 08/23/2013 78 FR 52608

Final Rule Effective 10/23/2015

Additional Information: Docket No. FMCSA- 97-2349.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2126- AB56; Related to 2126- AB21 Agency Contact: Genevieve Sapir Management Analyst Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Office of Policy (MC-CCR), 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-7056
E-Mail: genevieve.sapir@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB04

View Related Documents

Title: Highway-Rail Grade Crossing; Safe Clearance

Abstract: PHMSA and FMCSA amend the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) and Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSR), respectively, to prohibit a driver of a commercial motor vehicle or of a motor vehicle transporting certain hazardous materials or certain agents or toxins (hereafter collectively referenced as "regulated motor vehicle") from entering onto a highway–rail grade crossing unless there is sufficient space to drive completely through the grade crossing without stopping. This action is in response to section 112 of the Hazardous Materials Transportation Authorization Act of 1994 and section 32509 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act of 2012. The intent of this rulemaking is to reduce highway-rail grade crossing crashes.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed ActionMajor: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 392; 49 CFR 177 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Hazardous Materials Transportation Authorization Act of 1994 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule 02/16/1995

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/28/2011 76 FR 5120

NPRM Comment Period End 03/29/2011

NPRM Comment Period Reopened 03/30/2011 76 FR 17615
NPRM Re-opened Comment Period End 04/29/2011

Final Rule 09/25/2013 78 FR 58915

Final Rule Effective 10/25/2013

Additional Information: Docket FMCSA-2005 -25660 and docket PHMSA-2010-0319 (HM-255) as well as PHMSA RIN #
2137-AE69.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2126- AA18; Related to 2137- AE69 Agency Contact: Thomas Yager
Driver and Carrier Operations Division Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-4325
E-Mail: tom.yager@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB60

View Related Documents

Title: Amendments to Implement Certain Provisions of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act; Final

Rule

Abstract: The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) adopts as final regulation certain provisions required by the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act. The rule is a nondiscretionary ministerial action that can be taken without issuing a notice of proposed rulemaking and receiving public comment, in accordance with an exception available to Federal agencies under the Administrative Procedure Act.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 386 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 10/01/2013 78 FR 60226

Final Rule Effective 10/01/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Sean Gallagher
MC- PRR Department of TransportationFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-3740
E-Mail: sean.gallagher@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB62

View Related Documents

Title: Incorporation by Reference of Out-of-Service Criteria

Abstract: The final rule will update an existing incorporation by reference to adopt the new edition (October 1, 2013) of the "North American Standard Out-of-Service Criteria and Level VI Inspection Procedures and Out-of-Service Criteria for Commercial Highway Vehicles Transporting Transuranics and Highway Route Controlled Quantities of Radioactive Materials ad defined in 49 CFR part 173.403.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 385.4 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 5 USC 553 Administrative Procedure Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 09/13/2013 78 FR 56618

Final Rule Effective 09/13/2013

Additional Information: Includes Retrospective Review under E.O. 13563. SB - N IC - N SLT - N 1. Actual or Target Completion Date – TBD. 2. Anticipated savings in costs and/or information collection burdens, together with any anticipated changes in benefits (please quantify, to the extent feasible, and also specify baseline, time horizon, and affected groups) - The final rule will not change current cost or burdens. 3. Progress updates and anticipated accomplishments – To be determined 4.
Notes - None

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Brian Routhier Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-1225
E-Mail: brian.routhier@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) RIN: 2126-AB64

View Related Documents

Title: General Technical, Organizational, and Conforming Amendments to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations

Abstract: This final rule makes technical corrections throughout title 49 CFR subtitle B, chapter III. The Agency is making minor editorial changes to correct errors and omissions, ensure conformity with Office of the Federal Register style, and improve clarity. This rule does not make any substantive changes to the affected parts of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 325; 49 CFR 350; 49 CFR 355; 49 CFR 365; 49 CFR 369; 49 CFR 370; 49 CFR 372; 49 CFR 375; 49 CFR 376; 49 CFR 380; 49 CFR 381; 49 CFR 382; 49 CFR 383; 49 CFR 384; 49 CFR 385; 49 CFR 386; 49 CFR 387; 49 CFR 389; 49 CFR 390; 49 CFR 391; 49 CFR 395; 49 CFR 396; 49 CFR 397; 49 CFR 393 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 13101; 49 USC 31101; 49 USC 31301; 49 USC 31501 Legal Deadline: NoneTimetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 09/24/2013 78 FR 58470

Final Rule Effective 09/24/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Valerie Height Management Analyst Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Office of Policy (MC-PRR), 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-0901
E-Mail: valerie.height@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AK75

View Related Documents

Title: Alternative Fuel Vehicle Badging and Fuel Compartment Labels on Alternative Fuel Usage

Abstract: This rulemaking would respond to requirements of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), title 1, subtitle A, section 105, as it amends 49 USC section 32908, to implement Consumer Information and Consumer Education programs related to fuel economy, GHG, other emissions, and alternative fuels. EISA directs the Secretary of Transportation to label vehicles with a permanent and prominent display that an automobile is capable of operating on alternative fuels, and to include in the owner ́s manual for vehicles capable of operating on alternative fuels information that describes that capability and the benefits of using alternative fuels, including the renewable nature and environmental benefits of using alternative fuels. Additionally, EISA requires a label to be attached to the fuel compartment of vehicles capable of operating on alternative fuels, with the form of alternative fuel stated on the label. EISA, signed into Law on December 19, 2007, requires that the Secretary
issue a final rule not later than 42 months after the date of the enactment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 575 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 32908; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final rule 06/19/2011

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2127- AK73 Agency Contact: Gregory Powell Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 5206
E-Mail: gregory.powell@dot.govDepartment of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AK76

View Related Documents

Title: Tire Fuel Efficiency Consumer Information--Part 2

Abstract: This rulemaking would respond to requirements of the Energy Independence & Security Act of 2007 to establish a national tire fuel efficiency consumer information program for replacement tires designed for use on motor vehicles. On March 30, 2010, NHTSA published a final rule specifying the test procedures to be used to rate the performance of replacement passenger car tires for this new program (75 FR 15893). This rulemaking would address how this information would be made

available to consumers.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 575 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 32304 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Supplemental NPRM 04/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2127- AK83 Agency Contact: Mary Versailles
Office of Planning and Consumer Standards Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 2057
E-Mail: mary.versailles@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AK92

View Related Documents

Title: Heavy Vehicle Speed Limiters

Abstract: This rulemaking would respond to petitions from ATA and Roadsafe America to require the installation of speed limiting devices on heavy trucks. In response to the petitions, NHTSA requested public comment on the subject and received thousands of comments supporting the petitioner ́s request. This rulemaking would consider a new Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard that would require the installation of speed limiting devices on heavy trucks. Preliminary agency estimates indicate that this rule would decrease the estimated 1,115 fatal crashes annually involving vehicles with a GVWR of over 11,793.4 kg (26,000 lbs) on roads with posted speed limits of 55 mph or above.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30116; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: NoEnergy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Markus Price Safety Engineer Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 0098
E-Mail: markus.price@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AK95

View Related Documents

Title: Establish Side Impact Performance Requirements for Child Restraint Systems (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would include side impact performance requirements, a side impact test procedure, and the use of a new side impact dummy in FMVSS No. 213, Child Restraint Systems, to evaluate the performance of child restraint systems in side impacts. It is estimated that the costs and benefits of this rulemaking will be minimal. This rulemaking would be responsive to requirements of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.213 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule 10/01/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Cristina Echemendia Safety Standards Engineer Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 6345
E-Mail: cristina.echemendia@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AK96

View Related Documents

Title: Motorcoach Rollover Structural Integrity (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would promulgate a new FMVSS for rollover structural integrity requirements for motorcoaches. In August 2007, NHTSA published a motorcoach safety plan identifying four specific priority items: seat belts on motorcoaches, rollover structural integrity, emergency evacuation, and fire safety. The DOT published a comprehensive motorcoach safety action plan in November 2009 that reiterated NHTSA ́s motorcoach safety priorities. This rulemaking also addresses six recommendations issued by the NTSB on motorcoach roof strength and structural integrity and is responsive to requirements of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act.Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Publish Final Rule 10/01/2014

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Over the ten- year period between 2000 and 2009, there were 45 fatal motorcoach crashes resulting in 134 fatalities. During this period, on average, 13 fatalities have occurred annually to occupants of motorcoaches in crash and rollover events, with about 2 of these fatalities being drivers and 11 being passengers. However, while motorcoach transportation overall is safe, when serious crashes of this vehicle type do occur, they can cause a significant number of fatal or serious injuries during a single event, particularly when occupants are ejected. This action is consistent with our detailed plans for improving motorcoach passenger protection, laid out in NHTSA's Approach to Motorcoach Safety 2007 and the Department of Transportation 2009 Motorcoach Action Plan (Docket No. NHTSA-2007-28793), as well as the Agency's Vehicle Safety and Fuel Economy Rulemaking and Research Priority Plan 2011-2013 (Docket No. NHTSA-2009-0108), and is responsive to six recommendations issued by the National Transportation Safety Board. In addition, this action would fulfill a statutory provision of the Motorcoach Enhanced Safety Act of 2012 (incorporated and passed as part of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Action) for establishing motorcoach roof strength and crush resistance requirements, to the extent warranted under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act.

Legal Basis: Section 30111, title 49 of the U.S.C., states that the Secretary shall prescribe motor vehicle safety standards.

Alternatives: NHTSA is examining existing regulations as alternatives to this proposal. FMVSS No. 216 "Roof crush resistance," FMVSS No. 220, "School bus rollover protection," and UN ECE R.66 are among the existing regulations that the agency is considering. The agency is considering these alternatives in light of their ability to ensure occupant protection during a rollover crash as well as additional safety issues such as opening of egress portals, failure of seat and luggage rack anchorages, detachment of windows from their mounting.

Costs and Benefits: The net impact ranges from a net benefit of $9.5 million to $19.4 million if seat belt usage is 15 percent. If the seat belt usage rate is 84 percent, the estimated net impact ranges from a net benefit of $4.7 million to $13.1 million.

Risks: The Agency believes that there are no significant risks associated with this rulemaking, and that only beneficial
outcomes will occur.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Shashi Kuppa Chief, Special Vehicles and Systems Division Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 3827
FAX: 202-493- 7002
E-Mail: shashi.kuppa@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL01

View Related Documents

Title: FMVSS No. 218 and Enforcement Policy Concerning Novelty Helmets

Abstract: This rulemaking would clarify which helmets are motor vehicle equipment subject to the minimum requirements of FMVSS No. 218. In addition, this rulemaking would employ certain criteria to more readily identify helmets that do not comply. The rulemaking would provide an alternative compliance process to provide manufacturers employing innovative technologies with an opportunity to establish compliance with FMVSS No. 218 if their products do not meet the aforementioned criteria. This rulemaking would be responsive to requirements of MAP-21 legislation.Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.218 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30102; 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Shashi Kuppa Chief, Special Vehicles and Systems Division Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 3827
FAX: 202-493- 7002
E-Mail: shashi.kuppa@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL04

View Related Documents

Title: Q3s 3-year-old Side Impact Dummy (MAP-21

Abstract: This rulemaking would apply to a new anthropomorphic test device to be specified in title 49, part 572 of the CFR. The new device is a crash test dummy that represents a 3-year-old-child. The dummy, known as the Q3s, was developed to evaluate injuries to children in side impact crashes. If adopted into part 572, NHTSA would be able to propose the new dummy  ́s use in future side impact upgrades of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 213, Child restraint systems. This rulemaking would be responsive to requirements of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 572 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Publish Final Rule 10/01/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2127- AK95 Agency Contact: Peter Martin Safety Standards Engineer Department of TransportationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 5668
E-Mail: peter.martin@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL05

View Related Documents

Title: Amend FMVSS No. 210 to Incorporate the Use of a New Force Application Device (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 210, seat belt assembly anchorages, to replace the existing body blocks for testing the strength of seat belts with a new Force Application Device and associated positioning procedure. Because the device is easier to use than the current body blocks, this rulemaking would simplify the compliance test of the standard and make NHTSA ́s evaluation of seat belt anchorage strength more effective. We estimate the one-time cost of purchasing a set of these devices (approximately $40,000) would be offset by the continual labor cost savings in setting up the devices for testing. NHTSA ́s testing has demonstrated that the proposed force application devices do not appear to affect the stringency of the standard.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.210 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30102; 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/30/2012 77 FR 19155

NPRM Comment Period End 05/29/2012
Supplemental NPRM 04/00/2014

Additional Information: SB: Y IC: N SLT: N We anticipate that this rule will reduce testing costs compared to current standard. This rule will also reduce NHTSA compliance costs and industry testing costs annually starting with the effective date. We estimate the cost of each of the two sizes of the Force Application Device to be approximately $8,000 each. Assuming a vehicle manufacturer or testing facility purchases a set of two FAD1s and three FAD2s, the principal cost associated with this NPRM is the one-time purchase cost of the set, totaling $40,000. The FADs require significantly less effort, time and personnel to install in the test vehicle. Thus, we believe there would be associated cost savings which could off-set the purchase cost of the FADs.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Carla Rush Safety Standards Engineer Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 4583
E-Mail: carla.cuentas@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL06

View Related Documents

Title: Importation of Motor Vehicles Not Originally Manufactured to Comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards

Abstract: This rulemaking would set forth a draft new interpretation, and related proposed amendments to an existing regulation, concerning the statutes and regulations governing the importation of motor vehicles. It addresses motor vehicles (innew or used condition) that were originally manufactured as completed vehicles outside the United States but did not comply with and were not certified to applicable United States motor vehicle and motor vehicle equipment standards as so manufactured, and subsequently were partially disassembled and in total or in part offered for entry into the United States as motor vehicle equipment, instead of as a motor vehicle.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 591 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30141 to 30147; 49 USC 322a Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: William Shakely Attorney- Advisor Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 1723
E-Mail: william.shakely@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL08

View Related Documents

Title: Amendment to Part 543; Technical Performance Requirements for Immobilizer Devices

Abstract: This rulemaking would make a technical amendment to 49 CFR part 543 by adding optional technical performance requirements for immobilizer devices that would allow manufacturers of passenger motor vehicles to obtain an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the vehicle theft prevention standard for passenger motor vehicle lines that have, as standard equipment, an immobilization device that meets the added requirements.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 543 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 33101; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Hisham Mohamed Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-0307
E-Mail: hisham.mohamed@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT)National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL15

View Related Documents

Title: Amend Definition of 3-Wheeled Vehicles

Abstract: This rulemaking would change the regulatory definition of motorcycle to exclude three-wheeled vehicles that are configured like passenger cars. Under the existing regulatory definition of motorcycle in part 571.3, three-wheeled motor vehicles are classified as motorcycles. This is appropriate for motorcycles with sidecars, trikes, and other three-wheeled vehicles that are based on a motorcycle-like configuration. However, other three-wheeled vehicles have passenger-car characteristics such as fully enclosed cabins, hinged doors with roll-up windows, steering wheels, and side-by-side seating. Because these car-like vehicles ride on three wheels instead of four, they are not required to meet Federal safety standards for passenger cars (although they are subject to motorcycle safety standards.) Various car-like three-wheeled vehicle models have been imported into the U.S. and have been available for sale to the public. NHTSA believes consumers who purchase these vehicles are likely to assume that these vehicles have the same safety features and crash protection as passenger cars certified to federal safety
standards.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.3 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Mike Pyne
Office of Crash Avoidance Standards Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 4931
E-Mail: mike.pyne@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL20

View Related Documents

Title: Upgrade of LATCH Usability Requirements (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend FMVSS No. 225, Child restraint anchorage systems, to improve the ease of use for lower anchorages and tether in all rear seating positions in accordance with the "Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act" (MAP-21), Public Law 112-141, address comments on LATCH usability received in response to the LATCH public meeting held on February 8, 2007, and standardize features of LATCH for enabling simple and standardized consumer messaging to
facilitate increased LATCH use and correct child seat installation.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.225 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory Initiate Rulemaking 10/01/2013

Other Statutory Publish Final Rule 10/01/2015

Timetable:

Action Date FR CiteNPRM 09/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Cristina Echemendia Safety Standards Engineer Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 6345
E-Mail: cristina.echemendia@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL28

View Related Documents

Title: New FMVSS, Lamps and Reflective Devices for Agricultural Equipment (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would revise regulations in order to meet the requirements of the Congressional directive provided through the MAP-21 Act, subtitle F, section 31601, Rulemaking on Visibility of Agricultural Equipment. This is a statutory mandate. The costs and benefits have not yet been determined. The purpose of this rule would be to improve the daytime and nighttime visibility of agricultural equipment that may be operated on a public road. Agricultural equipment has the meaning given the term "agricultural field equipment" in the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE) Standard 390.4: "Agricultural tractors, self-propelled machines, implements, and combinations thereof designed primarily for agricultural field operations." The rule would establish minimum lighting and marking standards for applicable agricultural equipment according to the directive in MAP-21. According to section 31505 of the Motor Vehicle and Highway Safety Improvement Act of 2012, if the Secretary determines that any deadline for issuing a final rule under this act cannot be met, a new deadline may be established and a letter must be submitted to Congress explaining why the deadline cannot be met.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: PL 112-141; sec 31601; 126 Stat 775-776 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule 10/01/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: David Hines General Engineer Office of Crash Avoidance Standards Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 2720
E-Mail: dhines@nhtsa.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL33View Related Documents

Title: Part 575 Vehicle Defect Reporting Requirements

Abstract: This rulemaking would require passenger motor vehicle manufacturers (a) to affix, in the glove compartment or in another readily accessible location on the vehicle, a sticker, decal, or other device that provides, in simple and understandable language, information about how to submit a safety-related motor vehicle defect complaint to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; "(b) to prominently print the information described in subparagraph (A) within the owner ́s manual; and"(c) to not place such information on the label required under section 3 of the Automobile Information Disclosure Act (15 U.S.C. 1232). These requirements will apply to passenger motor vehicles manufactured in any model year beginning more than 1 year after the date on which a final rule is published.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 575 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 33101; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: MAP-21 requires a final rule or Letter to Congress by July 6, 2013.

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule or Letter to Congress 07/06/2013

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Hisham Mohamed Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-0307
E-Mail: hisham.mohamed@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL37

View Related Documents

Title: Rear Seat Belt Reminder System

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208, Occupant Crash Protection, to require automobile manufacturers to install a seat belt reminder system for the front passenger and rear designated seating positions in passenger vehicles. The seat belt reminder system is intended to increase belt usage and thereby improve the crash protection of vehicle occupants who would otherwise have been unbelted. This rulemaking would respond in part to a petition for rulemaking submitted by Public Citizen and Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, as well as to requirements in MAP-21.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.208 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30101; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory Initiate 10/01/2014

Other Statutory Final Rule 10/01/2015

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.govAgency Contact: Carla Rush Safety Standards Engineer Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 4583
E-Mail: carla.cuentas@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL41

View Related Documents

Title: FMVSS No. 571.108 License Plate Mounting Angle

Abstract: This rulemaking would harmonize the license plate mounting angle requirements for motorcycles with European regulatory requirements in response to a petition from the Motorcycle Industrial Council (MIC). MIC claimed that changing the license plate mounting angle would not adversely affect safety or law enforcement. MIC stated that by allowing a 30 degree upward angle, the license plate lamp can be physically located closer to the plate, retaining the incident angle and providing the same amount of illumination. In response to this petition, this rulemaking would amend the Federal motor vehicle safety standard (FMVSS) on lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment to allow the licenses plate mounting surface on motorcycles to be at an angle of up to 30 degrees beyond vertical. The agency believes that this rulemaking action would result in minor benefits resulting from cost saving associated with increased design flexibility. Because the agency does not believe that benefits from this rulemaking action would rise to the level that the action would be economically significant, the agency does not anticipate conducting a separate economic analysis for this rulemaking.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.108 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 301 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/03/2013 78 FR 54209

NPRM Comment Period End 11/04/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Markus Price Safety Engineer Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 0098
E-Mail: markus.price@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL43

View Related Documents

Title: Registered Importers of Vehicles Not Originally Manufactured to Conform to the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend NHTSA ́s regulations that pertain to the importation by registered importers (RIs) of motor vehicles that were not originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety, bumper, and theft prevention standards. The amendments would require RIs to certify to NHTSA, as appropriate, that an imported vehicle either is not required to comply with the parts marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard or that the vehicle complies with those requirements as manufactured, or as modified prior to importation. The amendment would replace text that was inadvertently omitted when the regulations were last revised.Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 592 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30141 to 30147; 49 USC 322 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Coleman R Sachs Chief, Import and Certification Division, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 3151
FAX: 202-366- 1024
E-Mail: coleman.sachs@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL45

View Related Documents

Title: Regulatory Update of Transfer and Sanction Programs

Abstract: This rulemaking would update the Federal regulations to reflect the new legislative requirements of the section 154 and 164 programs and make minor clarifications reflecting longstanding interpretations of the statutes and regulations. On July 6, 2012, the President signed into law the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), Public Law 112-141. MAP-21 includes specific provisions related to 23 U.S.C. sections 154 and 164. These provisions were first established as part of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) in 1998 to encourage States to enact Open Container laws (23 U.S.C. section 154) and Repeat Intoxicated Driver laws (23 U.S.C. section 164), also referred to as Repeat Offender laws, meeting minimum Federal standards. States that fail to meet the requirements of these provisions are penalized by the reservation of apportioned Federal-aid funds. A State may elect to use the reserved funds for alcohol-impaired driving programs (transfer to the State ́s section 402 apportionment) or to conduct Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) eligible activities (release to the State Department of Transportation). MAP-21 amended the procedures for reservation and use of apportioned Federal-aid funds for both programs. In addition, MAP-21 amended one of the minimum requirements States must meet under the section 164 program.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 1270; 23 CFR 1275 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 23 USC 154; 23 USC 164; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Matthew Weisman Trial Attorney Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366-5934FAX: 202-366-3820
E-Mail: matthew.weisman@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AK56

View Related Documents

Title: Require Installation of Seat Belts on Motorcoaches, FMVSS No. 208 (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would require the installation of lap/shoulder belts in newly-manufactured motorcoaches. Specifically, this rulemaking would establish a new definition for motorcoaches in 49 CFR part 571.3. It would also amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208, Occupant Crash Protection, to require the installation of lap/shoulder belts at all driver and passenger seating positions. It would also require the installation of lap/shoulder belts at driver seating positions of large school buses in FMVSS No. 208. This rulemaking responds, in part, to recommendations made by the National Transportation Safety Board for improving bus safety and to a newly enacted statutory mandate in MAP-21 to require seat belts

in certain buses.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.208; 49 CFR 571.3 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule 10/01/2013

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Over the ten- year period between 1999 and 2008, there were 54 fatal motorcoach crashes resulting in 186 fatalities. During this period, on average, 16 fatalities have occurred annually to occupants of motorcoaches in crash and rollover events, with about 2 of these fatalities being drivers and 14 being passengers. However, while motorcoach transportation overall is safe, when serious crashes of this vehicle type do occur, they can cause a significant number of fatal or serious injuries during a single event, particularly when occupants are ejected. This action is responsive to four recommendations issued by the National Transportation Safety Board.

Legal Basis: Section 30111, title 49 of the USC, states that the Secretary shall prescribe motor vehicle safety standards.

Alternatives: In addition to the proposed installation of lap/shoulder belts in all passenger seating positions on motorcoaches, the Agency is also pursuing improvements to motorcoach rollover structural integrity, fire safety, electronic stability control, and emergency egress to improve occupant protection. Our detailed plans for improving motorcoach passenger protection can be found in NHTSA's Approach to Motorcoach Safety 2007 and the Department of Transportation 2009 Motorcoach Action Plan (Docket No. NHTSA-2007-28793), as well as the agency's Vehicle Safety and Fuel Economy Rulemaking and Research Priority Plan 2011-2013 (Docket No. NHTSA-2009-0108). The Agency also alternatively evaluated proposing the installation of lap belts in all passenger seating positions on motorcoaches, and is seeking comments on the issue of retrofitting older
motorcoaches with seat belts.

Costs and Benefits: The anticipated total costs are expected to be $25.8 million for the 2,000 new motorcoaches producedeach year, plus added fuel costs. The Agency estimates the proposal has the potential to save 1-8 fatalities and 144–794 nonfatal injuries annually assuming a range of seat belt use between 15 and 83 percent. The cost per equivalent life saved at a seven percent discount rate is estimated to range from $1.8 to $9.9 million, based on an assumed seat belt use rate between 83 percent and 15 percent, respectively.

Risks: The agency believes there are no substantial risks to this rulemaking, and that only beneficial outcomes will occur as the industry moves to reduce injuries of motorcoach occupants.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/18/2010 75 FR 50958

NPRM Comment Period End 10/18/2010

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.govAgency Contact: Shashi Kuppa Chief, Special Vehicles and Systems Division Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 3827
FAX: 202-493- 7002
E-Mail: shashi.kuppa@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AK97

View Related Documents

Title: Electronic Stability Control Systems for Heavy Vehicles (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would promulgate a new Federal standard that would require stability control systems on truck tractors and motorcoaches that address both rollover and loss of control crashes. Rollover and loss of control crashes involving heavy vehicles is a serious safety issue that is responsible for 304 fatalities and 2,738 injuries annually. They are also a major cause of traffic tie-ups, resulting in millions of dollars of lost productivity and excess energy consumption each year. Suppliers and truck and motorcoach manufacturers have developed stability control technology for heavy vehicles to mitigate these types of crashes. Based on the technology unit costs and affected vehicles, we estimate technology costs would be $55 to 107 million, annually. However, the costs savings from reducing travel delay and property damage would produce net benefits of$128 - $372 million. This rulemaking is responsive to requirements of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP21) Act.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule 10/01/2014

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Rollover and loss of control crashes involving combination truck tractors and large buses is a serious safety issue that is responsible for 268 fatalities and 3000 injuries annually. They are also a major cause of traffic tie-ups, resulting in millions of dollars of lost productivity and excess energy consumption each year. This action is consistent with our detailed plans for improving motorcoach passenger protection, laid out in NHTSA's Approach to Motorcoach Safety 2007 and the Department of Transportation 2009 Motorcoach Action Plan (Docket No. NHTSA-2007-28793), as well as the agency's Vehicle Safety and Fuel Economy Rulemaking and Research Priority Plan 2011-2013 (Docket No. NHTSA-2009-0108), and is responsive to three recommendations issued by the National Transportation Safety Board.

Legal Basis: Section 30111, title 49 of the U.S.C., states that the Secretary shall prescribe motor vehicle safety standards.

Alternatives: The Agency considered two regulatory alternatives. First, we considered requiring truck tractors and large buses to be equipped with roll stability control (RSC) systems. The second alternative considered was requiring trailers to be equipped with RSC systems. When compared to the proposal, these alternatives provide fewer benefits because they are less effective at preventing rollover crashes and much less effective at preventing loss-of-control crashes.

Costs and Benefits: According to the NPRM, the anticipated total costs are expected to be $113.6 million for the 150,000 truck tractors and 2,200 large buses produced in 2012. The agency estimates the proposal has the potential to save 49- 60 fatalities, 649- 858 injuries, and 1,807- 2,329 crashes annually. The net cost per equivalent life saved at a 7 percent discount rate is estimated to range from $2.0- $2.6 million, and for a 3 percent discount rate is $1.5- $2.0 million. The net benefits are $155- $222 million at a 7 percent discount rate and $228- $310 million at a 3 percent discount rate.

Risks: The Agency believes that there are no significant risks associated with this rulemaking, and that only beneficial
outcomes will occur.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/23/2012 77 FR 30766

NPRM Comment Period End 08/21/2012

Final Rule 07/00/2014Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: George Soodoo Chief, Vehicle Safety Dynamics Division (NVS-122) Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 2720
FAX: 202-366- 4329
E-Mail: george.soodoo@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL13

View Related Documents

Title: Response to Petitions for Reconsideration (Part 2)--Designated Seating Position and Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages

Abstract: This rulemaking would respond to remaining issues regarding petitions for reconsideration received in response to a final rule. On October 8, 2008, NHTSA published a final rule amending the definition of the term, "designated seating position," as used in the Federal motor vehicle safety standards, to more clearly indicate which areas within the interior of a vehicle meet that definition. The final rule also established a calculation procedure for determining the number of designated seating positions at a seat location based upon seating surface width for passenger cars, buses, and light trucks and multipurpose passenger vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) less than 4,536 kilograms (kg) (10,000 pounds (lbs.)). On December 23, 2009 (74 FR 68185), a partial final rule responding to petitions for reconsideration was published that allowed one additional year of lead time so that vehicle manufacturers would need to start complying with the final rule on September 1, 2011. This final rule would address the remaining petitions for reconsideration and requests for interpretation of the October 2008 final rule. These include changes to the adopted definition of a DSP, the seating surface measuring procedure, countermeasure definition, and the DSP calculation. It would also address technical corrections, similitude with draft SAE J1100:2009, consumer information labels for non-DSPs, and petitions on preemption.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.3 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2127- AI94; Related to 2127- AK65 Agency Contact: Shashi Kuppa Chief, Special Vehicles and Systems Division Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 3827
FAX: 202-493- 7002
E-Mail: shashi.kuppa@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT)National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL17

View Related Documents

Title: Make Inoperative Exemptions, Vehicle Modifications to Accommodate People With Disabilities, From FMVSS No. 226

Abstract: This rulemaking would respond to a petition from Bruno Independent Living Aids to amend 49 CFR part 595, subpart C, Make Inoperative Exemptions, Vehicle Modifications to Accommodate People With Disabilities. Bruno is requesting that the Agency include a new exemption relating to the Federal motor vehicle safety standard for ejection mitigation that would allow them to modify vehicles without taking the vehicle out of compliance to facilitate the mobility of physically disabled drivers and passengers. This request is similar to others already granted by the agency.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.226; 49 CFR 595; 49 CFR 571.3 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority 49 CFR

1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/26/2012 77 FR 65352

NPRM Comment Period End 12/26/2012

Final Rule 07/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2127- AI94; Related to 2127- AK65 Agency Contact: Christopher Wiacek Safety Standards Engineer Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 4801
FAX: 202-493- 2739
E-Mail: chris.wiacek@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL27

View Related Documents

Title: Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108, "Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment"

Abstract: This rulemaking would restore the side marker lamp requirements for vehicles that are over 80 inches wide, and also less than 30 feet in overall length, to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated Equipment. The requirements were modified when the Agency published a final rule reorganizing the standard on December 4, 2007. A 1980 final rule created a relaxed requirement for vehicles that are less than 30 feet in overall length, so that dual wheeled pickup trucks that share components with regular pickup trucks did not have to meet separate requirements. This relaxed requirement was inadvertently omitted when the rule was reorganized in 2007, so this rulemaking would restore the 1980 language.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.108 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/04/2012 77 FR 71752NPRM Comment Period End 01/03/2013

Final Rule 12/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Markus Price Safety Engineer Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 0098
E-Mail: markus.price@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL35

View Related Documents

Title: Petitions for Reconsideration of 10-Year-Old Dummy Into FMVSS No. 213

Abstract: This rulemaking would respond to the petitions for reconsideration of the February 27, 2012 final rule. Most of the comments were regarding the new label requirement for child restraint with internal harness specifying the maximum child weight for lower anchorage usage to attach the child restraint to the vehicle seat.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.213 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30101; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 01/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2127- AL10 Agency Contact: Cristina Echemendia Safety Standards Engineer Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 6345
E-Mail: cristina.echemendia@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL46

View Related Documents

Title: Organization and Delegation of Duties

Abstract: This rulemaking would make one update and one procedural change to 49 CFR part 501, the chapter of the Code of Federal Regulations that sets forth the organization of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and delegations of authority from the NHTSA Administrator to other Departmental officials including the Deputy Administrator, Chief Counsel, and Senior Associate Administrators. This rule is ministerial in nature and relates only to Agency management, organization, procedure, and practice. As this rule would not have a substantive impact on the public, the Agency does not expect to receive significant comments on the substance of the rule.Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 501 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 105; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Dana Sade Attorney- Advisor Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 1834
E-Mail: dana.sade@nhtsa.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AK18

View Related Documents

Title: FMVSS No. 124, Accelerator Control Systems Upgrade

Abstract: The Agency is considering several revisions to FMVSS no. 124. First, we are considering revisions to the test procedures for vehicles with electronically controlled throttles as well as electric vehicles and hybrid vehicles. These test procedures are the product of several workshops and public meetings. We anticipate that all vehicles would be able to meet them because it would not involve changes to the existing basic requirements of the standard. Second, we are considering adding a new requirement for a brake-throttle override system on light vehicles. Under certain conditions, this would require that the braking system override the throttle control in the event of a conflict. All vehicle manufacturers are in the process of equipping all of their U.S. vehicles with such technology, if they have not done so already. We anticipate that this new requirement would accommodate the current and planned override technologies.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.124 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 301 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/16/2012 77 FR 22638

NPRM Comment Period End 06/15/2012

Final Rule 12/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Mike Pyne
Office of Crash Avoidance Standards Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 4931E-Mail: mike.pyne@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AK43

View Related Documents

Title: Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 111, Rearview Mirrors

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend Federal Motor Vehicle Standard No. 111; Rearview Mirrors, to reflect requirements contained in the Cameron Gulbransen Kids Transportation Safety Act of 2007. The Act requires that NHTSA expand the required field of view to enable the driver of a motor vehicle to detect areas behind the motor vehicle to reduce death and injury resulting from backing incidents, particularly incidents involving small children and disabled persons. According to the Act, such a standard may be met by the provision of additional mirrors, sensors, cameras, or other technology to expand the driver ́s field
of view.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.111 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Initiate rulemaking 02/28/2009

Other Statutory Final Rule 02/28/2011

Other Statutory FR per Letter to Congress 12/31/2011

Other Statutory FR per 2nd Letter to Congress 02/29/2012

Other Statutory FR per 3nd Letter to Congress 12/31/2012

Other Statutory Final Rule 01/02/2013

Other Statutory FR per 4th Letter to Congress 01/02/2015

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Vehicles that are backing up have a potential to create a danger to pedestrians and pedicyclists. NHTSA estimates that backover crashes involving light vehicles account for an estimated 228 fatalities and 17,000 injuries annually. In analyzing the data further, we found that many of these incidents occur off public roadways, in areas such as driveways and parking lots, and that they involve parents (or caregivers) accidentally backing over children. We have also found that children represent approximately 44 percent of the fatalities, which we believe to be unique to this safety problem.

Legal Basis: Section 3011, Title 49 of the U.S.C., states that the Secretary shall prescribe motor vehicle safety standards.

Alternatives: NHTSA is evaluating additional mirrors, sensors, cameras, and other technology to address this safety problem.

Costs and Benefits: Costs: 1.9 to 2.7 Billion Benefit: 95 to 112 Fatalities

Risks: The agency believes there are no substantial risks to this rulemaking.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 03/04/2009 74 FR 9477

ANPRM Comment Period End 05/04/2009

NPRM 12/07/2010 75 FR 76185

NPRM Comment Period End 02/07/2011

NPRM Comment Period Reopened 03/02/2011 76 FR 11417

NPRM Comment Period Reopened End 04/18/2011

Final Action 01/00/2015

Additional Information: The comment entitled 'Safety on Garbage Trucks' found in DOT's August 2011 Retrospective Regulatory Review Plan has been considered as part of this rulemaking. In considering several factors, the Agency has proposed to limit the scope of this rulemaking to light vehicles. The monetized costs outweigh the monetized benefits and therefore the net impact is a cost of between $677M and $1,048M. SB: N, IC: N, SLT: N

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Markus Price Safety Engineer Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 0098
E-Mail: markus.price@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AK86

View Related Documents

Title: Mandatory Event Data Recorder Requirements

Abstract: This rulemaking would establish a new Federal motor vehicle safety standard to mandate the installation of Event Data Recorders (EDR) in light vehicles. The standard would incorporate the current 49 CFR part 563, which established the current reporting requirement of voluntarily installed EDRs in light vehicles. Part 563 presently requires vehicle manufacturers who are voluntarily installing EDRs to be in compliance with the regulation by September 1, 2012. This rulemaking would not affect the 2012 compliance date for voluntarily-installed EDRs. Furthermore, this rulemaking would not modify any of the part 563 data elements, data capture and format requirements, data retrieval specifications, or data survivability and crash test requirements. Moreover, this rulemaking to mandate EDRs across the entire light vehicle fleet could contribute to advancements in vehicle designs, and advanced restraint and other safety countermeasures. The estimated total incremental costs associated with this rulemaking would be $24.4 million (2009 dollars), which is measured from a baseline of 91.6 percent EDR installation to 100 percent installation, assuming the sale of 15.5 million light vehicles per year.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 563 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rulemaking would establish a new Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard to mandate the installation of Event Data Recorders (EDRs) in light vehicles. The standard would incorporate current 49 CFR part 563, which established the current reporting requirement of voluntarily installed EDRs in light vehicles. Part 563 presently requires vehicle manufacturers who are voluntarily installing EDRs to be in compliance with the regulation by September 1, 2012. This proposal does not affect the 2012 compliance date for voluntarily-installed EDRs. Furthermore, this proposal does not modify any of the part 563 data elements, data capture and format requirements, data retrieval specifications, or data survivability and crash test requirements. It simply makes them required for light vehicles produced after September 1, 2014. • Why is this action necessary? To improve the agency efforts in understanding the performance of safety systems in crashes and aid the agency's investigations into vehicle defects. • What is the intended effect of this action? To assure that all light vehicles are equipped with an EDR that complies with 49 CFR part 563.

Legal Basis: Section 30111, title 49 of the U.S.C., states that the Secretary shall prescribe motor vehicle safety standards.

Alternatives: The agency considered the regulatory alternative of mandating event data recorder (EDR) requirements in part 563 instead of creating a new Federal motor vehicle safety standard. In comparing this alternative regulation to the proposed standard, the agency reasoned that creation of a new Federal motor vehicle safety standard was preferable to ensure that the Agency could more readily enforce the nonvoluntary aspects of the proposal. In this way the Agency would have expanded access to the Safety Act's enforcement authority.

Costs and Benefits: The vehicle cost for an EDR is estimated to be $20 per vehicle. The estimated total incremental costs associated with this proposal would be $24.4 million (2009 dollars), which is measured from a baseline of 91.6 percent EDR installation to 100 percent installation, assuming the sales of 15.5 million light vehicles per year. This cost reflects the need for technology improvements, as well as assembly costs, compliance costs, and paperwork maintenance costs for those 1.2 million vehicles that do not have EDRs. Technological improvements account for the majority of these costs. We do not expect this rule to be economically significant under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. However, we do expect it to be significant from a public interest perspective.

Risks: The Agency believes there are no substantial risks to this rulemaking, and that only beneficial outcomes will occur as the industry moves to equip all light vehicles with an EDR that complies with 49 CFR part 563.

Timetable:

Action Date FR CiteNext Action Undetermined

NPRM 12/13/2012 77 FR 74144

NPRM Comment Period End 02/11/2013

Additional Information: The comment entitled "Open Data for Safety & Innovation in Cars" found in DOT's August 2011 Retrospective Regulatory Review Plan has been considered as part of this rulemaking. SB: N IC: N SLT: N

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2127- AI72; Related to 2127- AK12 Agency Contact: Christopher Wiacek Safety Standards Engineer Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 4801
FAX: 202-493- 2739
E-Mail: chris.wiacek@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AK88

View Related Documents

Title: FMVSS 114, Theft Protection and Rollaway Prevention, Keyless Ignition Systems

Abstract: FMVSS No. 114, Theft protection and rollaway prevention, has provisions that govern the operation of ignition systems in vehicles. This rulemaking would address emerging safety concerns that NHTSA has identified using consumer compliance data regarding keyless ignition controls that are not directly addressed by this standard. The concerns are drivers who are unable to shut down the propulsion system of their vehicle in the event of any on-road emergency; drivers who shut off the propulsion system without putting their vehicle in park and walk away from the vehicle, leaving it prone to roll away; and drivers who do put their vehicle in park, but inadvertently leave the propulsion system active increasing the risk of carbon monoxide poisoning in a closed environment. We anticipate that these new requirements would have little or no anticipated cost as they are based on a new Society of Automotive Engineers Recommended Practice J2948-20110. We believe that manufacturers already intend to follow that Practice voluntarily. The benefits for these new provisions would be reduced consumer confusion with these new controls and reduced potential risk of death or injury. However, because these systems are not widespread in current vehicles, their benefits cannot yet be readily quantified.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.114 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/12/2011 76 FR 77183

NPRM Comment Period End 03/12/2012

NPRM Comment Period Extended 03/15/2012 77 FR 15351

NPRM Extended Comment Period End 03/22/2012

Final Rule 02/00/2015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: John Finneran Chief, Vehicle Controls and Adapted Vehicle Division Department of TransportationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-5559
E-Mail: john.finneran@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AK93

View Related Documents

Title: Sound for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles

Abstract: This rulemaking would respond to The Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Act of 2010, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to study and establish a motor vehicle safety standard that provides for a means of alerting blind and other pedestrians of motor vehicle operation for hybrid and electric vehicles. The PRIA contains an estimate of 2800 fewer injured pedestrians and pedalcyclists (35 equivalent lives saved) at a total estimated cost of $23.5M at the 3 percent discount rate and $22.9M at the 7 percent discount rate should the requirements of the NPRM be made final.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49
CFR 1.50 Legal Deadline: Legislation requires the Secretary of Transportation to initiate rulemaking by July 2012 and issue a final rule not later than January 2014.

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory Initiate rulemaking 07/05/2012

Other Statutory Final Rule 01/03/2014

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Act of 2010, signed into law on January 4, 2011, directs the Secretary to study and establish a motor vehicle safety standard that provides for a means of alerting blind and other pedestrians of motor vehicle operation. The Agency's proposed safety standard, issued January 14, 2013, will require hybrid and electric passenger cars, light trucks and vans (LTVs), medium and heavy duty trucks, buses, low speed vehicles (LSVs),and motorcycles to meet specified sound requirements as required by the Act. This standard will ensure that blind, visuallyimpaired, and other pedestrians are able to detect and recognize nearby hybrid and electric vehicles. The proposal estimated that 2,800 total injured pedestrians are expected to be avoided due to this proposal representing 35 equivalent lives saved.

Legal Basis: Section 30111, title 49 of the USC, states that the Secretary shall prescribe motor vehicle safety standards.

Alternatives: The Agency considered and sought public comment on alternatives including: (1) taking no action; (2) requiring alert sounds based on recordings of internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles; (3) specifying acoustic requirements for synthetic sounds that would closely resemble sounds produced by ICE vehicles; (4) setting requirements for alert sounds that possess aspects of both sounds produced by ICE vehicles and acoustic elements that contribute to detectability; and (5) using psychoacoustic principals to develop requirements for alert sounds that would have enhanced detectability but would not necessarily have a reference to sounds produced by ICE vehicles.

Costs and Benefits: In 2010 dollars at a 7 percent discount rate, the total costs are estimated to be $24.4M and monetized benefits at $134.1M, with net benefits estimated at $109.7M.

Risks: The Agency believes that there are no significant risks associated with this rulemaking, and that only beneficial
outcomes will occur.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/14/2013 78 FR 2797

NPRM Comment Period End 03/15/2013

Final Rule 04/00/2015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.govAgency Contact: Marisol Medri Safety Engineer Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 6987
E-Mail: marisol.medri@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AK98

View Related Documents

Title: Pedestrian Safety Global Technical Regulation (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would provide requirements to protect pedestrian heads and legs when impacted by the front end of vehicles. NHTSA initiated this rulemaking following the establishment of the Global Technical Regulation (GTR) by the UNECE ́s World Forum for the Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) in November 2008 and plans to base the new FMVSS
based on the GTR.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined

Additional Information: Before NHTSA can propose a pedestrian standard based on the GTR, additional research is needed to address technical issues related to the test procedure and test devices. SB: Y IC: N SLT: N

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Peter Martin Safety Standards Engineer Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 5668
E-Mail: peter.martin@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL03

View Related Documents

Title: Part 571 FMVSS No. 205, Glazing Materials, GTR (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would enhance FMVSS No. 205 by adopting a Global Technical Regulation (GTR), which contains updated performance tests for glazing materials that are composed of glass, laminated glass, or glass faced with plastic compared to what is currently in FMVSS No. 205. The tests in the GTR would allow manufacturers to achieve efficiencies in the certification process while not degrading safety or imposing new burdens.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.205 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined

NPRM 06/21/2012 77 FR 37478

NPRM Comment Period End 08/20/2012

Additional Information: SB: Y IC: N SLT: N Those manufacturers only testing to the current FMVSS 205 (ANSI Z26.1) and not ECE Regulation 43 would experience increased testing costs of between $1,900 and $2,100. Those manufacturers currently testing to both standards would experience a net savings. Because we do not know how many manufacturers are testing to multiple glazing standards, we cannot directly estimate the overall economic impact of the proposal. However, we do not believe that the economic impacts of this proposal would be greater than $0.009 to $0.01 per vehicle for a new make and model based on the possible increase in testing costs of $1,900 to $2,100 divided by an average vehicle design lifetime sales of 210,000

units.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: John Finneran Chief, Vehicle Controls and Adapted Vehicle Division Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-5559
E-Mail: john.finneran@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL12

View Related Documents

Title: Consumer Information on Fuel Economy, Emissions, and Alternative Fuel Usage

Abstract: This rulemaking would, as required by the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) and promulgated under 49 USC section 32908 (g), develop and implement a consumer information campaign to: (1) improve understanding of automobile performance related to fuel economy, greenhouse gas emissions, and other pollutant emissions; (2) inform consumers of the benefits of using alternative fuels and the location of alternative fueling stations; (3) and increase awareness of automotive thermal management technologies. This rulemaking is the third, and final, phase of consumer information initiatives required by EISA. The first phase promulgated new Fuel Economy and Environment labels for new automobiles, and was finalized in May 2011 (2127-AK73). The second phase (2127-AK75), currently being developed, addresses EISA requirements to: affix a permanent and prominent display that identifies new automobiles that are capable of operating on alternative fuels; attach a label to the fuel tank filler compartment of alternative fuel vehicles; and include in the owner ́s manual for vehicles capable of operating on alternative fuels information describing the benefits of using alternative fuels, including their
renewable nature and environmental benefits.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: None (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 32908; Delegation of Authority 49 CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory 06/16/2011

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: NoSmall Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2127- AK73; Related to 2127- AK75 Agency Contact: James Tamm Fuel Economy Division Chief Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 0515
E-Mail: james.tamm@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL24

View Related Documents

Title: Rapid Tire Deflation Test in FMVSS No. 110 (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would clarify the rapid tire deflation test included in FMVSS No. 110, Tire Selection and Rims for Motor Vehicles. After a recent review of the standard by the Agency, we have tentatively concluded that the rapid tire deflation test is unclear as currently stated with respect to testing of towed vehicles.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.110 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30111; 49 USC 30115; 49 USC 30117; 49 USC 30166; 49 USC 322; delegation of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined

NPRM 03/13/2013 78 FR 15920

NPRM Comment Period End 05/13/2013

Additional Information: SB: Y IC: N SLT: N This rule would not impose any costs upon manufacturers and may result in cost savings. This rule would relieve light trailer manufacturers of the burden, and the associated costs, associated with the rim retention requirement.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: George Soodoo Chief, Vehicle Safety Dynamics Division (NVS-122) Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 2720
FAX: 202-366- 4329
E-Mail: george.soodoo@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL30

View Related Documents

Title: Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety Programs (MAP-21)

Abstract: MAP-21 amended NHTSA ́s highway safety grant program (23 U.S.C. 402) and consolidated other grant programs into a single grant program, the national priority safety program grants (23 U.S.C. 405). MAP-21 requires NHTSA to award grants pursuant to rulemaking and to establish requirements for the graduated driver licensing (GDL) grant in accordance withthe notice and comment provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act. In order to meet the statutory rulemaking requirements and to award all grants in a timely manner in fiscal years 2013 and 2014, NHTSA proceeded with an expedited rulemaking by taking a two-pronged approach. First, on, October 5, 2012, NHTSA issued a non-significant notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for the minimum requirements for the GDL grant (RIN 2127-AL29). NHTSA then incorporated the GDL provisions, including addressing comments in response to the NPRM, into the Interim Final Rule for all of the grants.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 1200 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 23 USC 402; 23 USC 405; PL 112-141 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined

Interim Final Rule 01/23/2013 78 FR 4985

Interim Final Rule Effective 01/23/2013

Interim Final Rule Comment Period End 04/23/2013

Interim Comment Period Reopened 07/02/2013 78 FR 39589

Interim Final Rule Comment Period Extended End 09/30/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Jin Kim Attorney- Adivsor Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 5248
FAX: 202-366- 3820
E-Mail: jin.kim@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL32

View Related Documents

Title: Direct Final Rulemaking Procedures

Abstract: This rulemaking would establish direct final rulemaking procedures for use with regulatory changes on which no adverse comment is expected. Under these procedures, NHTSA would make regulatory changes that become effective a specified number of days after the date of publication in the Federal Register, unless NHTSA receives written adverse comment(s) or written notice of intent to submit adverse comment(s) by the date specified in the direct final rule. These new procedures would expedite the promulgation of routine and noncontroversial rules by reducing the time and resources necessary to develop, review, clear and publish separate proposed and final rules. NHTSA would not use direct final rule procedures for complex or controversial issues.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 563 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 1657; 49 USC 30103; 49 USC 30122; 49 USC 30124-25; 49 USC 30127; 49 USC 30146; 49 USC 30162; 49 USC 322; 49 USC 32303; 49 USC 32502; 49 USC 32504-05; 49 USC 32705; 49 USC 32901-02; 49 USC 33102-03; 49 USC 33107; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule

NPRM 03/26/2013 78 FR 18285

NPRM Comment Period End 05/28/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: NoSmall Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Lily Smith Attorney- Advisor Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 2992
E-Mail: lily.smith@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL34

View Related Documents

Title: Upgrade FMVSS No. 213 for Improved Child Occupant Protection

Abstract: In accordance with section 31501(b) of MAP-21, this rulemaking would upgrade FMVSS No. 213 seat assembly and test parameters. NHTSA is considering updates to the standard seat geometry, seat cushion stiffness, and seat belt assembly that better replicate real world conditions. In addition, revision to the frontal crash sled pulse is being considered to be more representative of crash pulses of the current vehicle fleet. Prior to MAP-21, the Agency had expressed its intention of examining potential upgrades to the frontal sled test in FMVSS No. 213 in its 2009-2011 Priority Plan (76FR17808 Docket NHTSA-2009- 0108).

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.213 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30101; PL 112-141, sec 31501; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: MAP-21 requires a final rule by October 1, 2016.

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory NPRM 10/01/2014

Other Statutory Final Rule 10/01/2016

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Cristina Echemendia Safety Standards Engineer Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 6345
E-Mail: cristina.echemendia@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL36

View Related Documents

Title: Advanced Glazing and Anti-Ejection Countermeasures

Abstract: In accordance with section 32703(b)(2) of MAP-21, this rulemaking would require motorcoach advanced glazing and anti-ejection safety countermeasures. NHTSA is considering portal improvements, such as advanced glazing, to prevent partial and complete ejection of motorcoach passengers, including children. In prescribing such standards, NHTSA will consider the impact of such standards on the use of motorcoach portals as a means of emergency egress. In 2007, NHTSA published its Approach to Motorcoach Safety describing the agency ́s comprehensive strategy to improve motorcoach safety. NHTSA ́s approach to motorcoach safety included four priority areas: reducing the risk of passenger ejection by requiring seat belts,improving rollover structural integrity, enhancing emergency evacuation, and upgrading fire safety. The U.S. Department of Transportation ́s (DOT) Motor Coach Safety Action Plan, issued in 2009 and updated in 2012, reasserted NHTSA ́s 2007 plan to reduce the risk of motorcoach passenger ejection by implementing new test procedures and more stringent window retention performance requirements for passenger ejection mitigation.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.205 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30101; PL 112-141, sec 32703; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: Subtitle G of MAP -21 titled "Motorcoach Enhanced Safety Act of 2012," includes section 32703(b)(2) which directs the Secretary of Transportation to prescribe regulations that address anti-ejection safety countermeasures, including advanced glazing within two years of the enactment of MAP-21, if such a standard meets the requirements and considerations set forth in subsections (a) and (b) of section 30111 of title 49, United States Code.

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule or Letter to Congress 10/01/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Check Kam Safety Standards Engineer Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 0247
E-Mail: check.kam@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL38

View Related Documents

Title: MAP-21 Civil Penalties Interpretation

Abstract: This rulemaking would provide interpretation for the added civil penalties factors pursuant to requirements in MAP21.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 578 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30101; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule or Letter to Congress. 10/01/2013

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Marie Choi Trial Attorney Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-1738

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL39

View Related Documents

Title: Electronic Disclosure of Odometer Requirements

Abstract: Pursuant to MAP- 21, this rulemaking would permit any written disclosures or notices and matters related to odometer information produced for the transfer of a vehicle to be provided electronically.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30101; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule 01/06/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Otto Matheke Attorney Advisor Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-5253

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AK72

View Related Documents

Title: Early Warning Reporting and Foreign Defect Reporting Regulation (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would make amendments to the early warning reporting (EWR) rule established pursuant to the Transportation Recall Enhancement, Accountability, and Documentation (TREAD) Act, as well as amendments to the regulations governing motor vehicle and equipment recalls. As to the changes to the EWR rule, this rulemaking would require that new safety equipment be added to the list of components for which manufacturers must provide early warning reporting. This rulemaking would add requirements that light vehicle manufacturers specify the vehicle type and the fuel or propulsion system type (like hybrids) in their quarterly EWR submissions. It would also add new component categories of electronic stability control for light vehicles, buses, emergency vehicles, and medium-heavy vehicle manufacturers; and forward collision avoidance, lane departure prevention, and back over prevention for light vehicle manufacturers. In addition to the EWR proposals, this rulemaking would require motor vehicle manufacturers to submit their annual list of substantially similar vehicles via the Internet. As for amendments to the safety recalls regulations, this rulemaking would impose various enhancements to garner information, in many cases electronically, that are expected to help expedite the agency’s review, processing, and distribution of information to the public related to a safety recall, as well as expedite the manufacturer’s information on a recall to affected owners and better inform consumers of whether their personal vehicles are affected by a safety recall. This rulemaking would be responsive to requirements of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 579 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30166 (m) (5) Legal Deadline:Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Publish Final Rule 10/01/2013

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/10/2012 77 FR 55605

NPRM Comment Period End 11/09/2012

Final Rule 08/20/2013 78 FR 51381

Final Rule Effective 10/21/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Christina Morgan Chief, Early Warning Reporting Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 4238
E-Mail: tina.morgan@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL31

View Related Documents

Title: Corrections and Minor Revisions to the MY 2014-2018 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency
Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles

Abstract: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) developed the first-ever program to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and fuel consumption in the heavy-duty highway vehicle sector. This broad sector--ranging from large pickups to sleeper-cab tractors--together represent the second largest contributor to oil consumption and GHG emissions from the mobile source sector, after light-duty passenger cars and trucks. The final rule was published in the Federal Register on September 15, 2011 (76 FR 57106). NHTSA is issuing this rulemaking to revise portions of the regulations in 49 CFR part 535 to correct technical errors and gaps identified in the promulgated MY 2014-2018 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles final

rule.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 523; 49 CFR 535 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 32902; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Rule 06/17/2013 78 FR 36369

Partial Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule; Direct Final Rule 08/16/2013 78 FR 49963

Direct Final Rule Effective Date 08/16/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2127- AK74 Agency Contact: James Tamm Fuel Economy Division Chief Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590Phone: 202-493-0515
E-Mail: james.tamm@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL40

View Related Documents

Title: Ejection Mitigation Reconsideration

Abstract: This rulemaking would respond to petitions for reconsideration of the January 19, 2011 final rule establishing FMVSS No. 226, Ejection Mitigation. The petitions pertained to detailed test procedure issues (i.e., clarification to the minimum allowable distance between targets, test procedure accuracy, vehicle test attitude, head skin cleaning specifications, etc.), exemption requests (i.e., grab-handles, rows with structural dividers, school buses, etc.) and to the lead time and phase-in schedule. The final rule will make minor modifications and clarifications to the standard in response to these issues.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571.226 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 30101; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 09/09/2013 78 FR 55137

Final Action Effective 10/09/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2127- AK23 Agency Contact: Louis Molino Safety Standards Engineer Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 1833
FAX: 202-366- 4329
E-Mail: louis.molino@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) RIN: 2127-AL42

View Related Documents

Title: Theft Prevention – 2014 Light Duty Truck Lines and Exempted Vehicle Lines

Abstract: This rulemaking would update the regulation to amend Appendix A to list the likely high-theft light duty truck lines that are subject to the parts-marking requirements of the theft prevention standard and to amend Appendix A-1 to include vehicle lines that are exempted from the parts-marking requirements beginning with model year 2014.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 541; 49 CFR 542; 49 CFR 543 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 33101- 06; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 07/23/2013 78 FR 44030

Final Action Effective 07/23/2013Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Rosalind Proctor Division Chief, Consumer Standards Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 0846
FAX: 202-493- 2290
E-Mail: rosalind.proctor@nhtsa.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC00

View Related Documents

Title: Critical Incident Stress Plan; "Critical Incident" Definition

Abstract: This rulemaking would seek to define the term "critical incident." This rulemaking would also seek to define program elements appropriate for the rail environment for certain railroad ́s critical incident response programs, so that appropriate action is taken when a railroad employee is involved in or directly witnesses a critical incident.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 217 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: PL 110-432, Div, sec 410(c) Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Rulemaking required by section 410(a) and (c) of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC10

View Related Documents

Title: Alcohol and Controlled Substance Testing for Maintenance-of-Way EmployeesAbstract: This rulemaking would revise the Federal Railroad Administration ́s (FRA) alcohol and drug regulations to cover all employees of railroads, railroad contractors, and subcontractors who perform maintenance-of-way activities. FRA's alcohol and drug regulations (49 CFR part 219) contain certain prohibitions on the use and possession of alcohol and drugs. The regulations also contain requirements for post-accident toxicological (PAT) testing, random testing, reasonable cause testing, reasonable suspicion testing, co-worker and voluntary referral policies, pre-employment drug testing, and reporting. Currently, the regulations only apply to covered employees (defined as employees assigned to perform covered service subject to the Hours of Service Act, 49 CFR chapter 211). In response to a statutory mandate, the proposed rulemaking would expand coverage of part 219 to employees who perform maintenance-of-way (MOW) activities. This rulemaking would also make other miscellaneous updates to 14 CFR part 219.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 226 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: PL 220-432, Div A, 122 Stat 4848 et seq; Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008; sec 412 (uncodified) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule 10/16/2010

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC11

View Related Documents

Title: Risk Reduction Program

Abstract: This rulemaking would consider appropriate contents for Risk Reduction Programs and how they should be implemented and reviewed by FRA.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 237 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: PL 110-432, Div A, 122 Stat 4848 et seq; Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008; sec 103, 49 USC 20156 "Railroad Safety Risk Reduction Program" Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule 10/16/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Rulemaking required by section 103 of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 12/08/2010 75 FR 76345

ANPRM Comment Period End 02/07/2011

NPRM 04/00/2014

Additional Information: SB - N, IC - N, SLT - N A comment on this rulemaking was received during the RRR process. Following publication of an ANPRM, hearings were held on July 19, 2011 (Chicago, IL) and July 21, 2011 (Washington, DC).

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC34

View Related Documents

Title: Passenger Train Door Operation and Door Safety Requirements

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the passenger equipment safety standards to enhance safety standards as they relate to passenger door securement while a passenger train is in service based on research and experiences of FRA safety inspectors. Specifically, FRA would incorporate by reference APTA standard: "APTA SS-M-18-10 Standard for Powered Exterior Side Door System Design for New Passenger Cars."

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 238 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 28 USC 2461, note; 49 CFR 1.49; 49 USC 20103; 49 USC 20107; 49 USC 20133; 49 USC 20141; 49 USC 20302 to 20303; 49 USC 20306; 49 USC 20701 to 20702; 49 USC 21301 to 21302; 49 USC 21304 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC40

View Related DocumentsTitle: Qualification and Certification of Locomotive Engineers; Miscellaneous Revisions (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would make conforming revisions to part 240 "Qualification and certification of locomotive engineers" consistent with part 242 "Qualification and Certification of Conductors." The promulgation of the conductor certification regulation highlighted areas in the regulation governing locomotive engineer certification that may require conforming changes. Such changes could include amending the program submission process, adding 49 CFR 218, subpart F violations as revocable offenses, handling engineer and conductor petitions for review with a single FRA board, and revising filing requirements for petitions to the Locomotive Engineer Review Board.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 240 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 28 USC 2461, note; 49 CFR 1.49; 49 USC 20103; 49 USC 20107; 49 USC 20135; 49 USC 21301; 49 USC 21304; 49 USC 21311 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC41

View Related Documents

Title: Hours of Service Recordkeeping; Electronic Recordkeeping Amendments (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would propose to provide simplified recordkeeping requirements to allow Class III and commuter railroads to utilize electronic recordkeeping. It would propose to permit railroads without electronic recordkeeping systems to manage reports of excess service internally without submitting them to the FRA, as currently required. The rule would not require the use of electronic recordkeeping, would be better tailored to small operations, and is expected to decrease the burden hours spent on recordkeeping.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 228 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 20103; 49 USC 20107; 49 USC 21101-21109 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC42

View Related Documents

Title: Use of Locomotive Horns at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings; Miscellaneous Revisions

Abstract: This rulemaking would make miscellaneous revisions to the existing regulations to address pedestrian crossings and alternatives to train horns in unique situations.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 222 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 20153 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC43

View Related Documents

Title: Safety Glazing Standards; Miscellaneous Revisions (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would propose to eliminate the requirement to stencil the interior wall of a locomotive, passenger car, or caboose which has compliant FRA glazing (section 223.17), update FRA ́s interpretation of "historical or antiquated equipment[,]" add a definition of the term to the rule text, and generally update the part to remove passed compliance dates.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 223 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 20103; 49 USC 20701 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: FRA's retrospective review required by EO 13579 and DOT's Paperwork Reduction Act Initiative identified the glazing safety standards as an existing regulation that could be modified to reduce the economic burden on the rail industry without having an impact on safety. This rule is needed to implement those modifications. This rule would reduce the paperwork burden on the rail industry by removing a locomotive cab stenciling requirement. This rule would also reduce the economic burden on the rail industry by clarifying the existing glazing standards related to historical and antiquated equipment. The clarification would reduce the number of waiver requests related to historical and antiquated equipment.

Legal Basis:Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC45

View Related Documents

Title: Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program Application Requirements

Abstract: This rulemaking would govern the application requirements for the Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program. The revisions are prompted by enactment of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, which converted the Surface Transportation Project Delivery Pilot Program into a permanent program, allowed any State to apply for the Program, expanded the scope of the Secretary's responsibilities that may be assigned and assumed under the Program, and created a renewal process for Program participation. This is a joint rulemaking with FHWA and FTA.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 773; 49 CFR 42 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 1313 of Map 21 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule 06/28/2013

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/30/2013 78 FR 53712

NPRM Comment Period End 10/29/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC46View Related Documents

Title: Passenger Equipment Safety Standards; Standards for Alternative Compliance and High-Speed Trainsets

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend 49 CFR part 238 to update existing safety standards for passenger rail equipment. Specifically, the proposed rulemaking would add standards for alternative compliance with requirements for Tier I passenger equipment, increase the maximum authorized speed for Tier II passenger equipment, and add requirements for a new Tier III category of passenger equipment.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 238 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 20103 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: State

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AB89

View Related Documents

Title: Roadway Worker Protection; Miscellaneous Revisions

Abstract: This rulemaking would revise FRA ́s Roadway Worker Protection regulations in 49 CFR part 214, to further advance the on-track safety of railroad employees and contractors engaged in maintenance-of-way activities throughout the general railroad system of transportation, including clarification of existing regulations. In doing so, FRA will review existing technical bulletins and a safety advisory dealing with on-track safety to consider implications, and as appropriate, consider enhancements to the existing regulations.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 214 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 28 USC 2461; 49 CFR 1.49; 49 USC 20103; 49 USC 20107; 49 USC 21301; 49 USC 21304 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/20/2012 77 FR 50324

NPRM Comment Period End 10/19/2012

Final Rule 06/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2130- AA86 Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of TransportationFederal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC06

View Related Documents

Title: Training Standards for Railroad Employees

Abstract: This rulemaking would (1) establish minimum training standards for each class or craft of safety-related employee and equivalent railroad contractor and subcontractor employee by requiring railroads, contractors, and subcontractors to qualify and document the proficiency of such employees on their knowledge and ability to comply with Federal railroad safety laws and regulations and railroad rules and procedures intended to implement those laws and regulations, etc.; (2) require submission of the training and qualification programs for FRA approval; and (3) establish a minimum training curriculum and ongoing training criteria, testing, and skills evaluation measures.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 243 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: PL 110 thru 432, Div A, 122 Stat 4848 et seq; Railroad Safety Improvement Act of 2008; sec 401 (49 USC 20162) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule 10/16/2009

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rulemaking is needed to establish minimum training standards for all safety-related railroad employees, as required by the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (RSIA). FRA believes the final rule will reduce rail-related accidents and incidents primarily through the implementation or augmentation of hands-on training components. With OSHA's encouragement, FRA has agreed to issue this regulation addressing training and qualification requirements for operators of railroad roadway maintenance machines that can hoist, lower, and horizontally move a suspended load. OSHA's requirements, if enforced, would have an unintended detrimental impact on interstate railroad operations.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/07/2012 77 FR 6412

NPRM Comment Period End 04/09/2012

Final Rule 04/00/2014

Additional Information: With respect to the RFA Analysis, please note the following: Businesses: Affected businesses include any employer of a safety-related railroad employee, including railroads and any contractor to a railroad. For profit training organizations and learning institutions that train safety-related railroad employees would also be affected. Organizations: Associations and other organizations that voluntarily develop model training programs for their members may also be affected. Governmental Jurisdictions: This category is only affected to the extent that a State or local jurisdiction is the owner or operator of a passenger or commuter railroad, and none of the impacted governmental jurisdictions are considered to be small entities.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions; Organizations Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of TransportationFederal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC14

View Related Documents

Title: Emergency Escape Breathing Apparatus

Abstract: This rulemaking would prescribe regulations that require railroads to provide specified emergency escape breathing apparatus for all crew members in locomotive cabs on freight trains carrying poison-inhalation-hazard hazardous material and provide training in its use.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 229 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: PL No. 110- 432, Div A, 122 Stat 4848 et seq; Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008; sec 413 49 USC 20166 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule 04/16/2010

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Rulemaking required by section 413 of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/05/2010 75 FR 61386

NPRM Comment Period End 12/06/2010

Final Rule 09/00/2014

Additional Information: SB - N, IC - N, SLT - N A comment on this rulemaking was received during the RRR process.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC22

View Related Documents

Title: Passenger Train Emergency Systems; Doors, Emergency Lighting, Emergency Signage and Markings for Egress and Access, and Low-Location Emergency Exit Path Marking; Miscellaneous Amendments

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the passenger equipment safety standards to enhance standards for passenger trainemergency systems and would clarify the passenger train emergency preparedness standards. Specifically, FRA would incorporate by reference three APTA emergency system standards: “Standard for Emergency Lighting System Design forPassenger Cars,” “Standard for Emergency Signage for Egress/Access of Passenger Rail Equipment,” and “Standard for LowLocation Exit Path Marking.” Miscellaneous amendments to FRA’s existing regulations would include: (1) clarifying that new passenger cars must have at least two exterior side doors, one on each side; (2) requiring removable panels/windows in vestibule doors for new passenger cars; (3) consolidating various door requirements into one section for easier reference; and (4) revising part 239 to explicitly address train crew participation in debrief and critique sessions.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 238; 49 CFR 239 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 28 USC 241, note; 49 CFR 1.49; 49 USC 20103, 20107, 20133, 20141, 20302-20303, 20306, 20701-20702; 49 USC 21301-21302, 21304 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rule is needed to enhance and establish new regulatory requirements for emergency systems on passenger trains. Existing regulatory requirements do not reflect advancements in both technology and in industry standards that more fully address current passenger safety needs. A review of these needs and related NTSB safety recommendations has identified specific regulatory requirements that could be beneficial to the safety of passenger rail service, such as emergency lighting systems in all passenger rail cars.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/03/2012 77 FR 154

NPRM Comment Period End 03/05/2012

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC26

View Related Documents

Title: National Highway-Rail Crossing Inventory Reporting Requirements

Abstract: This rulemaking would require railroads to provide and periodically update information about the characteristics of public, private, and pathway crossings over which they operate. This rulemaking is being prompted by section 204 of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 222 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 20160 Legal Deadline: NoneTimetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/18/2012 77 FR 64077

NPRM Comment Period End 12/17/2012

Final Rule 02/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC28

View Related Documents

Title: Track Safety Standards: Improving Rail Integrity

Abstract: This rulemaking would prescribe specific requirements for effective rail inspection frequencies, rail flaw remedial actions, minimum operator qualifications, and requirements for rail inspection records. In addition, it would remove the regulatory requirements concerning joint bar fracture reporting. Section 403(c) of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 mandates that FRA promulgate regulations addressing rail flaw detection inspections.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 213 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 28 USC 2461, note; 49 CFR 1.49; 49 USC 20102 to 20114; 49 USC 20142; sec 403, Div A; PL 110-432, 122
Stat 4885 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory Final Rule 10/18/2010

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/19/2012 77 FR 64249

Comment Period End 12/17/2012

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Additional Information: SB - N, IC - N, SLT - N This rulemaking will address a comment on DOT's Retrospective Regulatory

Review.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT)Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC31

View Related Documents

Title: Railroad System Safety Program

Abstract: This rulemaking would improve passenger railroad safety through structured, proactive processes and procedures developed by passenger railroad operators. It would require passenger railroads to establish a System Safety Program that would systematically evaluate and manage risks in order to reduce the number and rates of railroad accidents, incidents, injuries and fatalities. This rulemaking was bifurcated from 2130-AC11.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 270 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 20103; 49 USC 20107; 49 USC 20133; 49 USC 21301 to 21302; 49 USC 21304; 49 USC 21311; 28 USC 2461, note; 49 CFR 1.49 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final Rule 10/16/2012

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Rulemaking required by section 103 of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/07/2012 77 FR 55372

NPRM Comment Period End 11/06/2012

NPRM Comment Period Reopened 11/26/2012 77 FR 70409

Comment Period End 12/07/2012

Final Rule 07/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC32

View Related Documents

Title: Positive Train Control Systems: De Minimis Exception, Yard Movements, En Route Failures; Miscellaneous Grade Crossing/Signal and Train Control Amendments (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would revise Positive Train Control regulations by defining the de minimis exception and en route failures, proposing exceptions relating to yard movements that may not be considered on the main line system, and amending regulations governing grade crossing and signal and train control systems. The rulemaking is in response to a petition for rulemaking from the Association of American Railroads.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: NoCFR Citation: 49 CFR 234; 49 CFR 236 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 20102 and 20103; 28 USC 2461, note; 49 CFR 1.49; 49 USC 20107; 49 USC 20133; 49 USC 20141; 49 USC 20157; 49 USC 20301 to 20303; 49 USC 20306; 49 USC 21301 and 21302; 49 USC 21304 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The regulation is needed to reduce burdens associated with implementation of the Positive Train Control (PTC) provision (at 49 U.S.C. section 20157) of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (RSIA) (Div. A of Pub. L. 110-432, 122 Stat. 4907). The regulation responds to a petition for rulemaking that was referenced in a March 2, 2012 settlement agreement with the Association of American Railroads (AAR), resolving the litigation brought by AAR concerning FRA's first and
second PTC final rules.

Legal Basis: The regulation is authorized by the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, 49 U.S.C. section 20157, as well as pre-existing signal inspection statutes, 49 U.S.C. section 20501 et seq.

Alternatives: Without this regulation, the current regulations will require PTC installation on track segments and on

locomotives at more substantial cost.

Costs and Benefits: This proposed rule has been evaluated in accordance with existing policies and procedures, and determined to be significant under Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 13563 and DOT policies and procedures. See 44 FR 11,034 (Feb. 26, 1979). The benefit-cost analysis considered the track segments and locomotives that would no longer require PTC implementation, as well as the forgone safety benefits from the lack of PTC systems on those track segments or locomotives. For the 20-year period analyzed, the estimated quantified cost that would be imposed totals with a present value, discounted at 7 percent, of $360 thousand. Over the same 20-year period, this analysis finds a present value, discounted at 7 percent, of $32.5 million in benefits would be accrued. The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires an agency to review regulations to assess their impact on small entities. An agency must conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis unless it determines and certifies that a rule is not expected to have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. section 605(b), FRA certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant negative impact
on a substantial number of small entities.

Risks: The risk category addressed by the proposed rule is generally that of safety involving accidents that occur due to improper train operations, i.e., train-to-train collisions, overspeed derailments, and incursions into roadway worker limits. The proposed rule is intended to align the requirements of the PTC regulations more closely with those areas of greatest risk. The track segments excluded from PTC implementation as a result of the proposed rule have a relatively lower risk than other segments, and the requirements of the expanded exception to cover these track segments further reduces the likelihood of a PTC-preventable accident. Accordingly, FRA believes that the proposed rule will have a minimal impact on safety.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/11/2012 77 FR 73589

NPRM Comment Period Extended 01/28/2013 78 FR 5767

NPRM Comment Period End 02/11/2013

Comment Period End 03/11/2013

Final Rule 02/00/2014

Additional Information: SB - N SLT - N IC - N

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC33

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Passenger Train Emergency Preparedness Regulations (Part 239)Abstract: The rulemaking would propose a series of unrelated revisions to 49 CFR part 239. These proposed revisions would: (1) create a definition for emergency response communication centers to ensure that railroad personnel who coordinate first responders receive control center employee training provided by part 239; (2) require railroads develop procedures to promote the safe evacuation of disabled passengers; (3) make the FRA emergency preparedness plan approval process more efficient; and (4) create new testing and inspection requirements for railroads covered by part 239. These revisions are based on a recommendation made to FRA by the Railroad Safety Advisory Committee.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 239 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 20103; 49 USC 20107; 49 USC 20133; 49 USC 20141; 49 USC 20302 to 20303; 49 USC 20306; 49 USC 20701 to 20702; 49 USC 21301 to 21302; 49 USC 21304; 28 USC 2461, note; 49 CFR 1.49 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Members of the Railroad Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC) Passenger Safety Working Group expressed confusion regarding existing part 239 requirements on passenger train emergency preparedness (e-prep). Current regulations required the railroad's control center to carry out emergency notification activities that were not suitable given that they were carrying out other important duties during a train emergency. After reviewing the issues, the RSAC recommended that the requirements include all personnel that participate in emergency preparedness under part 239 and relieve irrelevant personnel from them. While the proposed regulation differs slightly from the consensus language, the need for this NPRM is backed by the RSAC process and the proposed changes would improve passenger train emergency preparedness by clarifying training and testing requirements, streamlining the approval of e-prep plans, and clarifying that railroads must include procedures in their e-prep plans addressing the safe evacuation of persons with disabilities during emergency situations as well as full-scale stimulations of emergency situations.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/27/2012 77 FR 38248

NPRM Comment Period End 08/27/2012

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC37

View Related Documents

Title: Roadway Worker Protection; Adjacent-Track On-Track Safety--Response to Petitions for Reconsideration

Abstract: This rulemaking would respond to petitions for reconsideration of the final rule published on November 30, 2011. This Final Rule will make amendments to the original Adjacent-Track On-Track Safety Final Rule.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 214 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )Legal Authority: 49 USC 20103 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 02/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2130- AB96 Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton Trial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration ( FRA ) RIN: 2130-AC44

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Signal System Reporting Requirements (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would propose the elimination of the requirement to submit a signal system report every 5 years. FRA believes that the information contained in such reports is available to FRA through other sources and the need for a separate and somewhat duplicative report every 5 years is unnecessary.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 233 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 20503 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rulemaking is needed to eliminate the paperwork burden associated the Signal System Five-Year Report, see 49 CFR 233.9, which FRA has determined to be unnecessary. Railroads frequently make modifications to their signal systems, and the information received in the Signal System Five-Year Report is normally out-of-date by the time FRA receives the report. Moreover, FRA can get similar, more up-to-date data from the railroads through other means. For these reasons, FRA has initiated this rulemaking (in accordance with EO 13610) in order to reduce an unjustified regulatory burden

and cost.

Legal Basis:

Alternatives:

Costs and Benefits:

Risks:

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/19/2013 78 FR 36738

NPRM Comment Period End 08/19/2013

Final Rule 03/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn SheltonTrial Attorney Department of Transportation
Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-493- 6063
E-Mail: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Transit Administration ( FTA ) RIN: 2132-AB07

View Related Documents

Title: Transit Asset Management

Abstract: This ANPRM has been consolidated with the ANPRM for the National and Public Transportation Agency Safety Plans. See 2132-AB20. This rule would establish a system for Transit Asset Management (TAM) for all operators of public transportation, for all modes of transportation throughout the United States. This national system will be based on the term  ́State of Good Repair, ́ to be developed through rulemaking, which will generate accurate data about the condition of the transit agencies ́ assets, and performance measures for improving the conditions of those assets.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5326(d) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Secretary must issue rule to implement the Transit Asset Management System by October 1, 2013.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 10/03/2013 78 FR 61251

ANPRM Comment Period End 01/02/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Merge with 2132- AB20 Agency Contact: Scott Biehl
Senior Chief Counsel Department of Transportation
Federal Transit Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-0826
E-Mail: scott.biehl@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Transit Administration ( FTA ) RIN: 2132-AB20

View Related Documents

Title: National and Public Transportation Safety Plans (MAP-21) and Transit Asset Management

Abstract: This is a joint ANPRM for certain requirments of the Public Transportation Safety Program and the of the National Tranist Asset Management System. SAFETY This rule, mandated by MAP-21, will create and implement a National Public Transportation Safety Plan that will include: (1) safety performance criteria for all modes of public transportation; (2) the definition of State of Good Repair established under separate rulemaking; (3) minimum safety performance standards for public transportation vehicles used in revenue operations that do not apply to vehicles regulated by another Federal agency; and (4) a public transportation safety certification training program. This rule will also establish requirements for each 5307 and 5311 recipient in developing and implementing individual agency safety plans. This rule will ultimately be broken into three separate rulemakings for the National Plan and the Agency Plans, and the training certification program. TRANSIT ASSET
MANAGEMENT See 2132-AB07Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5326 and 5329 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act ("MAP-21," effective Oct. 1, 2012) placed substantial new obligations upon the Department, FTA, and its recipients. Among those changes was a new Federal public transportation safety program for the DOT, public transportation agency safety plans by local transit agencies, and the creation of transit asset management systems and plans at the national and local levels.

Legal Basis: Title 49 US Code, sections 5326 (Transit Asset Management) and 5329 (Safety).

Alternatives: N/A

Costs and Benefits: The costs and benefits of these rulemakings are unknown at this time, as the prospective shape and direction of the regulatory obligations are undetermined. FTA will estimate the costs and benefits of these rulemakings at the notice of proposed rulemaking stage.

Risks: Regulated parties could raise the traditional concerns about unfunded Federal mandates and lack of transparency. But many of the safety costs will be covered by or eligible for Federal grants, and by issuing an ANPRM prior to a proposed rule, FTA hopes to enlist the involvement of affected stakeholders prior to publication of the NPRM.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 10/03/2013 78 FR 61251

ANPRM Comment Period End 01/02/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2132- AB07 Agency Contact: Scott Biehl
Senior Chief Counsel Department of Transportation
Federal Transit Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-0826
E-Mail: scott.biehl@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Transit Administration ( FTA ) RIN: 2132-AB06

View Related Documents

Title: Private Sector Participation

Abstract: This rulemaking will develop procedures to address the impediments to the private sector’s participation in public transportation capital projects through public private partnerships (P3s) and private investment. It will also include procedures to ensure the protection of the public interest and public investment in public transportation projects involving private participants.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 20012(b)(5) of MAP -21; 49 USC 5315 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory The Secretary shall issue a rule including procedures and approaches regarding private sector participation in public transportation projects 10/01/2013

Timetable:

Action Date FR CiteNPRM 07/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Jayme Blakesley Attorney- Advisor Department of Transportation
Federal Transit Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-0304
E-Mail: jayme.blakesley@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Transit Administration ( FTA ) RIN: 2132-AB10

View Related Documents

Title: Statewide and Nonmetropolitan Transportation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation Planning (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would propose amendments 49 CFR part 613 and 23 CFR part 450 under which the FTA and the FHWA respectively administer the Metropolitan Transportation Planning program and the Statewide Non-Metropolitan Transportation Planning program. MAP-21 requires a continuing, comprehensive, and coordinated transportation planning and programming process in metropolitan areas, nonmetropolitan areas, and Statewide.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 450; 23 CFR 500; 49 CFR 613 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 1201, 1202, 1310, and 1320, PL 112-141 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2125- AF52 Agency Contact: Dana Nifosi Department of Transportation
Federal Transit Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 4000
E-Mail: dana.nifosi@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Transit Administration ( FTA ) RIN: 2132-AB11

View Related Documents

Title: Bus Testing: Pass/Fail and Safety Criteria (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend FTA ́s Bus Testing regulation (49 CFR part 665) to implement 49 USC section 5318, as amended by MAP-21, specifically, to establish a pass/fail standard and minimum safety performance standards pursuant to 49 USC 5329(b).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 665 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5318Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory 10/01/2014 10/01/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Bruce Walker Attorney- Advisor Department of Transportation
Federal Transit Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-4011
FAX: 202 366-3809
E -Mail: bruce.walker@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Transit Administration ( FTA ) RIN: 2132-AB14

View Related Documents

Title: Additional Categorical Exclusions Under NEPA (MAP-21)

Abstract: Under MAP-21, section 1318, the Department of Transportation was mandated to survey categorical exclusions (CE) use on transportation projects since 2005, and to solicit requests from transit agencies and State departments of transportation for new CEs. This rulemaking pertains to the new categorical exclusions; FTA is proposing to add CEs to its environmental regulations (23 CFR 771) in order to comply with MAP-21, as well as to improve the efficiency of the environmental review process. The additional CEs make the least intensive form of review available for those actions that typically do not have the potential for significant environmental effects, and, therefore, do not merit additional analysis and documentation associated with an environmental assessment (EA) or an environmental impact statement (EIS).

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 771; 49 CFR 622 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 1318 of MAP -21 (PL 112-141) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory Statutory deadline within MAP-21 for NPRM. 01/29/2013

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/19/2013 78 FR 57587

NPRM Comment Period End 11/18/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Dana Nifosi Deputy Chief Counsel Department of Transportation
Federal Transit Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-4000
E-Mail: dana.nifosi@dot.govDepartment of Transportation (DOT) Federal Transit Administration ( FTA ) RIN: 2132-AB15

View Related Documents

Title: Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program

Abstract: This rulemaking will implement changes to the Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program (23 U.S.C. 327) established by SAFETEA-LU, which originally enabled the Secretary of Transportation to assign NEPA responsibilities for highway projects to five specific States. Section 1313 of MAP-21 made several key modifications to this program, including: removing the "pilot" designation and making the program permanent; extending eligibility to all States; allowing assignment of NEPA responsibilities for transit, railroad, and multimodal projects in addition to highway projects; and providing transit agencies the option to request opting out of the program. MAP-21 requires that the Secretary of Transportation amend the regulation that establishes application requirements of a State requesting to participate in the program. A joint rulemaking effort between FTA, FHW, and FRA to amend the existing regulation at 23 CFR 773 would satisfy these requirements of MAP-21.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 773 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 23 USC 327, sec 1313 of MAP-21 (PL 112-141) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Statutory deadline in 23 USC 327 06/27/2013

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/30/2013 78 FR 53712

NPRM Comment Period End 10/29/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2125- AF50 Agency Contact: Dana Nifosi Deputy Chief Counsel Department of Transportation
Federal Transit Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-4000
E-Mail: dana.nifosi@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Transit Administration ( FTA ) RIN: 2132-AB16

View Related Documents

Title: Buy America: Amendments (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend 49 CFR part 661 to incorporate changes to the waiver process made by MAP-21 and to make other conforming updates and amendments.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 661 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5323(j) and (m) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: NoEnergy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Dana Nifosi Deputy Chief Counsel Department of Transportation
Federal Transit Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-4000
E-Mail: dana.nifosi@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Transit Administration ( FTA ) RIN: 2132-AB17

View Related Documents

Title: Core Capacity Projects (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would establish the steps in the process and the evaluation criteria for a new category of eligible capital investment projects created by MAP-21 called "core capacity projects." Core capacity projects are improvements to existing transit lines that are currently at capacity or will be in 5 years. The proposed projects must increase capacity in the corridor by at least 10 percent.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5309 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Dana Nifosi Deputy Chief Counsel Department of Transportation
Federal Transit Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-4000
E-Mail: dana.nifosi@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Transit Administration ( FTA ) RIN: 2132-AB18

View Related Documents

Title: New and Small Start Projects (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would establish the steps in the process for New and Small Starts projects. The final rule published in January 2013 made final most of the MAP-21 evaluation criteria, except for the congestion relief criterion. This new rulemaking would build on that work by establishing the requirements for advancing through the steps in the process and outlining the congestion relief criterion that will be used by FTA.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 611 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5309 Legal Deadline: NoneRegulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (“MAP-21,” effective Oct. 1, 2012) made a number of changes to the project development process for New and Small Starts projects authorized by 49 U.S.C. 5309, and created a new discretionary program for Core Capacity Improvement (“CCI”) projects. This rulemaking will carry out the new CCI program and the changes to the project development process for New and Small Starts as required by MAP-21.

Legal Basis: 49 U.S.C. 5309(g)(6) requires the Secretary to issue regulations setting the evaluation and rating process for the New Starts, Small Starts, and Core Capacity Improvement programs and the projects that seek discretionary Federal financial assistance under those programs.

Alternatives: N/A

Costs and Benefits: On average, Congress appropriates approximately $2 billion per year for the discretionary programs under 49 U.S.C. 5309, and FTA oversees more than $10 billion in Section 5309 funds that have been committed to New and Small Starts projects. The costs and benefits of this rulemaking will be assessed during the development of the NPRM, but they are likely to be similar to those identified in the preamble to the final rule for the previous rulemaking on New and Small Starts, issued on January 9. 2013, at 78 FR 1992-2037.

Risks: This rulemaking will modify the framework whereby FTA administers the competitive, discretionary Federal grant-in-aid programs under 49 U.S.C. 5309. This rulemaking will not regulate any entities other than the State and local agencies that apply for the discretionary funds. As such, this rulemaking poses no risks for the regulated communities other than the risks inherent in pursuing Federal-aid grant funds in competition with other applicants.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Dana Nifosi Department of Transportation
Federal Transit Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 4000
E-Mail: dana.nifosi@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Transit Administration ( FTA ) RIN: 2132-AB19

View Related Documents

Title: State Safety Oversight (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking will set standards for State Safety Oversight of rail transit systems and criteria for award of FTA grant funds to help the States develop and carry out their oversight programs.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 659 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: PL 112-141, sec 20021 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (“MAP-21,” effective Oct. 1, 2012) made substantial changes to the program for State safety oversight of rail fixed guideway public transportation systems, and created a new program of Federal financial assistance to the States for the purpose of conducting their oversight of rail transit system safety. This rulemaking will flesh out the statutory changes to the program and set the process for making grants of Federal funding to the States.

Legal Basis: 49 U.S.C. 5329(e)(9) requires the Secretary to issue regulations to carry out the State safety oversight program for rail fixed guideway public transportation systems.

Alternatives: N/A

Costs and Benefits: This rulemaking is not anticipated to add significant costs or benefits to the State Safety Oversight rulesthat have been in place since 1995. The costs and benefits will be assessed during the development of the NPRM, but it's critical to note that State Safety Oversight of rail transit systems will no longer be an unfunded mandate; for the first time, under MAP-21, Federal funding will be available to the States to assist them in conducting their oversight, and this rulemaking will set the process for making the FTA grants to the States.

Risks: This rulemaking will not regulate any entities other than States that have rail fixed guideway public transportation systems and the State Safety Oversight Agencies that conduct oversight of those rail transit systems. The Federal funding for State Safety Oversight will be apportioned by formula, based on the statutory criteria set forth in 49 U.S.C. 5329(e)(6)(B)(i), thus, this rulemaking poses no risks for the regulated communities other than the risks inherent in conducting the oversight of the safety of the rail transit systems for which they are responsible.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Scott Biehl
Senior Chief Counsel Department of Transportation
Federal Transit Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-0826
E-Mail: scott.biehl@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Transit Administration ( FTA ) RIN: 2132-AB05

View Related Documents

Title: Environmental Impact and Related Procedures (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would change FTA and FHWA joint procedures that implement NEPA. This action would add two new categorical exclusions under 23 CFR 771.117(c) for actions eligible for assistance under 23 USC, within an existing operational right-of-way and actions with limited Federal assistance as described in section 1316 and 1317 of MAP-21, respectively.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 23 CFR 771; 49 CFR 622 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 1316 and 1317 of MAP-21 (PL 112-141) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory NPRM 02/28/2013

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/28/2013 78 FR 13609

NPRM Comment Period End 04/29/2013

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Merge with 2125- AF48 Agency Contact: Dana Nifosi Deputy Chief Counsel Department of Transportation
Federal Transit Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-4000E-Mail: dana.nifosi@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Transit Administration ( FTA ) RIN: 2132-AB13

View Related Documents

Title: Public Transportation Emergency Relief Program (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would implement 49 U.S.C. 5324, as amended by MAP-21, the public transportation emergency relief program. The rulemaking would establish eligible activities and ineligible activities, processes, and procedures for applying for grants.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 602 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5324; 49 USC 5334 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final 12/31/2013

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Interim Final Rule 03/29/2013 78 FR 19136

Interim Final Rule Effective 03/29/2013

Interim Final Rule Comment Period End 05/28/2013

Final Rule 02/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Bonnie Graves Attorney- Advisor Department of Transportation
Federal Transit Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-4011
E-Mail: bonnie.graves@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Maritime Administration ( MARAD ) RIN: 2133-AB87

View Related Documents

Title: National Shipping Authority, Ship Manager Citizenship

Abstract: The Agency is considering whether to revise its longstanding citizenship requirements for Ready Reserve Fleet and National Defense Reserve Fleet Ship Managers and General Agents. MARAD ́s current regulation requires that ship managers meet the highest citizenship standard (referred to as Section 2 Citizenship) at every tier of ownership. The criteria are over 50 years old. It has been 20 years since we last queried the public on this issue. Our decision then was to leave the requirement unchanged. We are seeking to ensure whether the citizenship criteria are relevant and current with US maritime commerce today.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 46 CFR 315 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 46 USC 121; 46 USC 50501 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 01/00/2014Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Christine Gurland Department of Transportation
Maritime Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-5157
E-Mail: christine.gurland@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Maritime Administration ( MARAD ) RIN: 2133-AB84

View Related Documents

Title: Marine Highway Corridor Expansion

Abstract: This rulemaking would broaden the definition of short sea transportation to include transportation services that promote short sea transportation. Pursuant to section 405, of the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2012. The new definition allows for the expansion of Marine Highway Corridors to include Hawaii.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 46 CFR 393 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: sec 405 Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2012, PL 112-213 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Mitch Hudson Attorney Department of Transportation
Maritime Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-9373
E-Mail: mitch.hudson@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Maritime Administration ( MARAD ) RIN: 2133-AB86

View Related Documents

Title: American Fisheries Act

Abstract: This rulemaking would implement statutorily mandated updates of section 607 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010 to make certain large replacement fishing industry vessels and non-harvesting/non-processing fish tender vessels eligible for a fishery endorsement. With the addition of section 307 in the Transportation Act of 2012, this rulemaking will also ensure that certain large vessels are prohibited from operating in the ground fishery.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 46 CFR 356 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 46 USC 12113(d); sec 602 of PL 111-281. Legal Deadline: NoneTimetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Mitch Hudson Attorney Department of Transportation
Maritime Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-9373
E-Mail: mitch.hudson@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Maritime Administration ( MARAD ) RIN: 2133-AB85

View Related Documents

Title: Maritime Security Program Extension

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend 46 CFR part 296 to conform to the technical changes made to 46 U.S.C. chapter 531 pursuant to section 3508 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2013. It would allow for the extension of the Maritime Security Program by updating 46 CFR part 296, the current MSP implementing regulations.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 46 CFR 296 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 46 USC ch 531; sec 3508 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2013 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Mitch Hudson Attorney Department of Transportation
Maritime Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-9373
E-Mail: mitch.hudson@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Maritime Administration ( MARAD ) RIN: 2133-AB74

View Related Documents

Title: Regulations To Be Followed by All Departments, Agencies and Shippers Having Responsibility To Provide a Preference for U.S.-Flag Vessels in the Shipment of Cargoes on Ocean Vessels

Abstract: This rulemaking would update and clarify the Cargo Preference rules that have not been revised substantially since

1971.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: NoCFR Citation: 46 CFR 381 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 CFR 1.66; 46 app USC 1101; 46 app USC 1241; 46 USC 2302 (e)(1); PL 91-469 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: On September 4, 2009, the USDA, MARAD, and USAID entered into a MOU regarding the proper implementation of the Cargo Preference Act. The MOU establishes procedures and standards by which owners and operators of oceangoing cargo ships may seek to designate each of their vessels as either a dry bulk carrier or a dry cargo liner, according to specified service-based criteria. With the help of OMB, these agencies are in the process of negotiating updates to the comprehensive cargo preference rule, which has not been significantly changed since 1971.

Legal Basis: The Cargo Preference Act requires that Federal agencies take necessary and practicable steps to ensure that privately owned U.S. flag vessels transport at least 50 percent of the gross tonnage of cargo sponsored under Federal programs to the extent such vessels are available at fair and reasonable rates for commercial vessels of the U.S., in a manner that will ensure a fair and reasonable participation of commercial vessels of the U.S. in those cargoes by geographic areas. 46 U.S.C. 55305(b). An additional 25 percent of gross tonnage of certain food assistance programs is to be transported in accordance with the requirements of 46 U.S.C. 55314.

Alternatives: TBD

Costs and Benefits: TBD

Risks: TBD

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Next Action Undetermined

Additional Information: SB no, IC unknown, SLT no, Cost/benefits unknown, Notes: draft sent to OMB 12/16/11

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business;
Governmental Jurisdictions Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2133- AB75 Agency Contact: Christine Gurland Department of Transportation
Maritime Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-5157
E-Mail: christine.gurland@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Maritime Administration ( MARAD ) RIN: 2133-AB83

View Related Documents

Title: Cruise Vessel Security and Safety Act of 2010

Abstract: The Cruise Vessel Security and Safety Act of 2010 imposes new security and safety requirements on cruise ships that carry at least 250 passengers and call on a port in the United States, except as part of a coastwise voyage. Pursuant to the Act, the Maritime Administration may certify organizations that offer training and certification. MARAD is developing policy guidance consistent with DOT administrative practices to establish a training provider certification program.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: The Cruise Vessel Security and Safety Act of 2010 (PL 111-207, 124 Stat 2243) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Terminated 08/19/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: NoSmall Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Christine Gurland Department of Transportation
Maritime Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-5157
E-Mail: christine.gurland@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE91

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Rail Petitions and Recommendations to Improve the Safety of Railroad Tank Car Transportation (RRR)

Abstract: PHMSA is considering amendments that would enhance safety and revise and clarify the HMR applicable to the transportation of hazardous materials by rail. This action responds to petitions for rulemaking submitted by the regulated community and NTSB recommendations that are associated with the petitions. Specifically, these amendments would identify elements of non-conformity that do not require a movement approval from the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA); correct an unsafe condition associated with pressure relief valves (PRV) on rail cars transporting carbon dioxide, refrigerated liquid; revise outdated regulations applicable to the repair and maintenance of DOT Specification 110, DOT Specification 106, and ICC 27 tank car tanks (ton tanks); except ruptured discs from removal if the inspection itself damages, changes, or alters the intended operation of the device; and enhance the standards for DOT Specification 111 tank cars used to transport Packing Group I and

II hazardous materials.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 173; 49 CFR 174; 49 CFR 178; 49 CFR 179 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This ANPRM is a crucial step by DOT in considering how to reduce the risks related to the transportation of hazardous materials by rail. Preventing tank car incidents and minimizing the consequences when an incident does occur are not only DOT priorities, but are also shared by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), industry, and the general public. These same groups also question the survivability of general service tank cars built to the current regulatory requirements. To this end, PHMSA will consider regulatory amendments to enhance the standards for tank cars, most notably, DOT Specification 111 tank cars used to transport certain hazardous materials and explore additional operational requirements to enhance the safe transportation of hazardous materials by rail.

Legal Basis: The authority of 49 U.S.C. 5103(b), which authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to “prescribe regulations for the safe transportation, including security, of hazardous materials in intrastate, interstate, and foreign commerce.”

Alternatives: PHMSA and FRA are committed to a comprehensive approach to addressing the risk and consequences of derailments involving hazardous materials by addressing not only survivability of rail car designs, but the operational practices of rail carriers. Obtaining information and comments in an ANPRM will provide the greatest opportunity for public participation in the development of regulatory amendments, and promote greater exchange of information and perspectives among the various stakeholders to promote future regulatory action on these issues.

Costs and Benefits: Given that we are in the ANPRM stage of this action, we are still determining the best path forward. As such, the costs and benefits have not yet been fully quantified. The ANPRM requests comments on both the path forward and the economic impacts.

Risks: DOT conducted research on long-standing safety concerns regarding the survivability of the DOT Specification 111 tank cars designed to current HMR requirements and used for the transportation of flammable liquids. The research found that special consideration is necessary for the transportation of flammable liquids in DOT Specification 111 tank cars, especially when a train is configured as a unit train. Through the research, DOT identified and ranked several enhancements to the current specification that would increase tank car survivability. The highest ranked options are low cost and the most effective at preventing loss of containment and catastrophic failure of a DOT Specification 111 tank car during a derailment.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 09/06/2013 78 FR 54849ANPRM Comment Period End 11/05/2013

ANPRM Comment Period Extended 11/05/2013 78 FR 66326

ANPRM Extended Comment Period End 12/05/2013
ANPRM Analyzing Comments 12/00/2013

Additional Information: HM-251; SB -Y; IC-Y; SLT-N; This ANPRM will provide the greatest opportunity for public participation in the development of regulatory amendments, and promote greater exchange of information and perspectives among the various stakeholders. This additional step will lead to more focused and well-developed proposals that reflect the views of all regulated entities. Comments received will be used in our evaluation and development of future regulatory action on these

issues.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Ben Supko Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553
E-Mail: ben.supko@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE37

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Bulk Loading and Unloading Operations

Abstract: This regulatory action is being withdrawn and replaced with a guidance document that will address safe loading and unloading practices. In addition to guidance, PHMSA plans to conduct research to evaluate the safety impacts of human factors on loading and unloading operations.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 177; 49 CFR 172 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/11/2011 76 FR 13313

NPRM Comment Period End 05/10/2011

Comment Period Extended to June 9, 2011 05/11/2011 76 FR 27300

NPRM Comment Period Extended 05/11/2011 76 FR 27300

NPRM Comment Period End 06/09/2011 76 FR 13313
Closing of Extension of Comment Period 06/09/2011

Comment Period Extended 06/09/2011 76 FR 27300

To Be Withdrawn 03/00/2014

Additional Information: HM-247

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Ben Supko Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553E-Mail: ben.supko@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE58

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Adoption of American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code
Section XII and the Nat'l Board Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors Code

Abstract: PHMSA is considering amending the HMR to revise existing requirements applicable to the design, construction and certification of cargo tank motor vehicles and cryogenic portable tanks and to reference the standards in the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section XII. The rule would also consider revising the continuing qualification and maintenance requirements for cargo tank motor vehicles and portable tanks to reference the National Board Boiler and Pressure Inspectors' National Board Inspection Code. We would solicit comments to identify gaps or inconsistencies between current requirements and the consensus standards which would be considered for adoption into the HMR. The rule would also solicit information on the potential costs and burdens that would be associated with compliance with these consensus standards. This rulemaking would address two petitions for rulemaking to incorporate the above referenced consensus standards for transport tanks.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 171; 49 CFR 178; 49 CFR 180 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 12/23/2010 75 FR 80765
ANPRM Comment period extended to 05/23/2011 03/01/2011 76 FR 11191

ANPRM Comment Period End 03/23/2011

ANPRM Extended Comment Period End 05/23/2011

NPRM 11/00/2013

Additional Information: HM-241

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Lisa Winter O'Donnell Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553
E-Mail: lisa.o'donnell@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE66

View Related Documents

Title: Pipeline Safety: Safety of On-Shore Liquid Hazardous Pipelines

Abstract: This rulemaking would address effective procedures that hazardous liquid operators can use to improve the protection of High Consequence Areas (HCA) and other vulnerable areas along their hazardous liquid onshore pipelines. PHMSA is considering whether changes are needed to the regulations covering hazardous liquid onshore pipelines, whether other areas should be included as HCAs for integrity management (IM) protections, what the repair timeframes should be for areas outside the HCAs that are assessed as part of the IM program, whether leak detection standards are necessary, valve spacing requirements are needed on new construction or existing pipelines, and PHMSA should extend regulation to certain pipelines currently exempt from regulation. The Agency would also address the public safety and environmental aspects any new requirements, as well as the cost implications and regulatory burden.Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 195 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 60101 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rulemaking would respond to the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-90), which includes several provisions and mandates that are relevant to the 49 CFR including section 195.452 (hazardous liquid integrity management). The rule also would respond to several NTSB recommendations, a GAO recommendation, public safety community input, research and technology advancements, and reviews of recent incident and accident reports to refine and improvement of existing hazardous liquid regulations. This action would better protect the public, property, and the environment by ensuring that additional pipelines are subject to regulation, thus increasing the detection and
remediation.

Legal Basis: Congress established the current framework for regulating the safety of hazardous liquid pipelines in the Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety Act (HLPSA) of 1979 (P.L. 96-129). Like its predecessor, the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968 (P.L. 90-481), the HLPSA provided the Secretary of Transportation (Secretary) with the authority to prescribe minimum Federal safety standards for hazardous liquid pipeline facilities. That authority, as amended in subsequent reauthorizations, is currently codified in the Pipeline Safety Laws (49 U.S.C. §§ 60101 et seq.).This action would respond to the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-90), which requires that the Secretary of Transportation to study and submit to Congress reports on various topics related to hazardous liquid transportation by pipeline and to amend the current pipeline safety statutes through the rulemaking process after submission of these reports. The mandates which this rule responds to are found in Section 5(IM), Section 8 (leak detection), Section 21 (Gathering Lines), Section 29 (seismicity) and Section 14 (bio fuels).

Alternatives: PHMSA considered various alternatives for each of the eight proposals of this NPRM. The alternative considered for all proposals was "no action or status quo" in addition to other various appropriate alternatives. Other alternatives reviewed included establishing different requirements for the large and small operators; creating a "Monitored" category; application of the existing IM repair criteria to anomalous conditions discovered outside of HCAs, use of a tiered, risk-based approach for repairing anomalous conditions discovered outside of HCAs, require ILI assessment for all pipelines and a rigid structured data integration program. Special consideration was given to alternatives that lessened regulatory burdens and provided operator flexibility in performance of a requirement.

Costs and Benefits: PHMSA cannot estimate costs or benefits precisely, but based on the information, the present value of costs and benefits over a 20-year period is approximately $56 million and $98 million, respectively at 7 percent. Thus, net benefits are approximately $46 million ($102 million - $56 million) over 20 years.

Risks: This rulemaking would provide increased safety for the regulated entities and reduce pipeline safety risks.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 10/18/2010 75 FR 63774

ANPRM Comment Period Extended 01/04/2011 76 FR 303

ANPRM Comment Period End 01/18/2011

ANPRM Extended Comment Period End 02/18/2011

NPRM 04/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: John A Gale Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 0434
E-Mail: john.gale@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE71

View Related DocumentsTitle: Pipeline Safety: Excess Flow Valves In Applications Other Than Single-Family Residences in Gas Distribution Systems

Abstract: This rulemaking would require excess flow valves (EFVs) be installed in all new and renewed gas service lines, for structures other than single family dwellings, when the operating conditions are compatible with readily available valves. These changes would be in response to NTSB and PHMSA investigations of current EFV installation practices. The intended effect of the rule is to increase the level of safety for structures other than single family dwellings currently subject to Federal pipeline safety regulation.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 192 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 60101 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 11/25/2011 76 FR 72666

Comment Period Extended 02/03/2012 77 FR 5472

ANPRM Comment Period End 02/18/2012

NPRM 05/00/2014

Additional Information: DOT Docket #: PHMSA -2011-0009

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions; Organizations Federalism: No

Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Mike Israni General Engineer Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 4571
E-Mail: mike.israni@rpsa.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE72

View Related Documents

Title: Pipeline Safety: Gas Transmission (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking action would enhance safety, revise and clarify the pipeline safety regulations applicable to the transmission and gathering of natural gas by pipeline. This rulemaking would address the implementation of integrity management principles for gas transmission pipelines in and out of High Consequence Areas (HCAs). In addition, PHMSA would also address the repair criteria for both HCA and non-HCA areas, corrosion control requirements, MAOP exceedance reporting and expanding requirements for integrity management.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 192 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 60101 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: PHMSA will be reviewing the definition of an HCA ( including the concept of a potential impact radius), the repair criteria for both HCA and non-HCA areas, requiring the use of automatic and remote controlled shut off valves, valve spacing, and whether applying the integrity management program requirements to additional areas would mitigate the need for class location requirements. This rulemaking is in direct response to Congressional mandates in the 2011 Pipeline Reauthorization Act, specifically; section 4 (e) Gas IM plus 6 months), section 5(IM), 8 (leak detection), 23 (b)(2)(exceedance of MAOP); section 29 (seismicity). Congress has requested PHMSA to review the existing regulations for gas transmission by pipeline and strengthen them through more clarity and expansion of of IM for gas pipelines. The goal of this rule is to improve gas transmission pipeline safety.Legal Basis: This action would respond to the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011 (P.L. 112- 90), which requires that the Secretary of Transportation to study and submit to Congress reports on various topics related to transmission of natural gas by pipeline and to amend the current pipeline safety statutes through the rulemaking process after submission of these reports. The mandates which this rule responds to are found in section 4 (e) (Gas IM) , section 5 (IM), section 23 (b)(2)(exceedance of MAOP) and section 29 (seismicity).

Alternatives: Alternative analyzed included no change and extention of the compliance deadlines associated with the major cost of the requirement area; namely, development and implementation of management of change processes that apply to all gas transmission pipelines beyond that which already applies to beyond IMP- and control center-related processes.

Costs and Benefits: PHMSA does not expect the proposed rule to adversely affect the economy or any sector of the economy in terms of productivity and employment, the environment, public health, safety, or State, local, or tribal government. PHMSA has also determined, as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities in the United States. Additionally, PHMSA determined that the rule would not impose annual expenditures on State, local, or tribal governments in excess of $152 million, and thus does not require an Unfunded Mandates Reform Act analysis. However, the rule would impose annual expenditure on private sector in excess of $152 million and is therefore economically significant.

Risks: This proposed rule will strengthen current pipeline regulations and lower the safety risk of all regulated entities.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 08/25/2011 76 FR 5308

ANPRM Comment Period Extended 11/16/2011 76 FR 70953

ANPRM Comment Period End 12/02/2011

End of Extended Comment Period 01/20/2012

NPRM 07/00/2014

Additional Information: SB- Y IC- N SLT-N;

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Cameron H Satterthwaite Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-8553
E-Mail: cameron.satterthwaite@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE80

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Miscellaneous Pressure Vessel Requirements (DOT Spec Cylinders) (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would revise certain requirements of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) applicable to the manufacture, maintenance, and use of DOT specification cylinders. These revisions clarify certain important safety requirements, incorporate industry consensus standards and, where appropriate, decrease the regulatory burden without compromising the safe transportation of compressed gases in commerce. This rulemaking responds to eleven petitions for rulemaking, incorporates two special permits into the HMR and addresses the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Recommendation I-93-1. Among other provisions, PHMSA would provide requirements for the transport of fire suppression systems, clarify cylinder specification and requalification requirements, and adopt new and update current incorporations by reference of industry consensus standards issued by the Compressed Gas Association.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 171; 49 CFR 172; 49 CFR 173; 49 CFR 178; 49 CFR 180 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 to 5128 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 05/29/2012 77 FR 31551

ANPRM Comment Period End 08/27/2012

NPRM 03/00/2014

Additional Information: HM-234; SB - Y, SLT - N, IC - N; PHMSA anticipates that this NPRM will generally reduce burdens for most stakeholders and eliminate the need to apply for special permits, as three special permits may be incorporated and lower paperwork burden. Other benefits include simplifying hazard communication requirements and increased filling density for certain gases leading to potentially fewer vehicle trips. A future rulemaking may result in a decrease in the annual burden and
costs under certain OMB Control Numbers.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kevin Leary Transportation Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-8553
E-Mail: kevin.leary@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE81

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Reverse Logistics (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would address changes to the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) that are applicable to reverse logistics based on petitions received by PHMSA. The issue of reverse logistics involves the transportation of hazardous materials that have been damaged or returned from the retailer to a return center. Specifically, the rulemaking would establish a regulatory definition of "reverse logistics" and outline the responsibilities of those that offer hazardous materials returned by
retail customers.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 173; 49 CFR 171; 49 CFR 178 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 07/05/2012 77 FR 39662

ANPRM Comment Period End 10/03/2012

NPRM 05/00/2014

Additional Information: HM-253; SB - Y, SLT - N, IC - N; The NPRM aims to identify ways to reduce the burden on the regulated community when returning retail products that pose a low hazard in transportation. These actions possibly include the return of damaged retail products from the consumer back to the distribution facility. Further, this action is in support of governmental efforts to provide regulatory relief to the regulated community while enhancing existing safety.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Steven Andrews Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553E-Mail: steven.andrews@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE85

View Related Documents

Title: Pipeline Safety: Periodic Updates of Regulatory References to Technical Standards and Miscellaneous Amendments (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the pipeline safety regulations to incorporate by reference all or parts of new, updated, or reaffirmed editions of voluntary consensus standards. The use of voluntary consensus standards allows pipeline operators to use the most current industry technologies, materials, and management practices available in today ́s market. It also would make non-substantive edits and clarify regulatory language in certain provisions. These amendments to the pipeline safety regulations would not require pipeline operators to undertake any significant new pipeline safety initiatives.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 192; 49 CFR 193; 49 CFR 195 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 60101 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/16/2013 78 FR 49996

NPRM Comment Period End 10/15/2013

Additional Information: SB - N SLT - N IC - N

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Mike Israni General Engineer Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 4571
E-Mail: mike.israni@rpsa.dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE86

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Requirements for the Safe Transportation of Bulk Explosives (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) by establishing standards for the safe transportation of bulk explosives. This rulemaking would be responsive to two petitions for rulemaking submitted by industry representatives, requesting this action. Developing requirements for the HMR should provide greater access to the regulatory flexibility currently only offered by special permit and competent authorities. The HMR would authorize the transportation of certain explosives, ammonium nitrate, ammonium nitrate emulsions, and other specific hazardous materials in bulk packagings, which are not otherwise authorized under the HMR. These hazardous materials are used in blasting operations on specialized vehicles, multi-purpose bulk trucks (MBTs). (MBTs are used as mobile work platforms to create blends of explosives that are unique for each blast site.)

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 171; 49 CFR 172; 49 CFR 173; 49 CFR 177; 49 CFR 177 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 et seq Legal Deadline: NoneTimetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2014

Additional Information: HM-233D; SB - N, SLT - N, IC - N; This NPRM is responsive to two petitions for rulemaking submitted by industry representatives, requesting action. Developing requirements for the HMR would provide wider access to the regulatory flexibility currently only offered by special permit and competent authorities. This rulemaking is expected to result in a decrease of $10.6 million in the annual burden and cost to multiple OMB Control Numbers (2137-0014 and 2137-0051) due to decreased paperwork burdens.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Matthew Nickels Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553
E-Mail: matthew.nickels@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE93

View Related Documents

Title: Pipeline Safety: Issues related to the use of Plastic Pipe in Gas Pipeline Industry

Abstract: This rulemaking would address a number of issues related to the use of plastic pipe in the gas pipeline industry. These issues include composite pipe petitions, plastic issues on gas lines, authorized use of PA12 at higher pressures, 50 year markings, increasing design factor from 0.32 to 0.40 for polyethylene pipe, characterization of "plastic pipe" to "non-metallic pipe," leak repair revisions, incorporation by reference certain ANSI standards and enhanced tracking and traceability of lines.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 192; 49 CFR 195 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 60101 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Governmental
Jurisdictions Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Cameron H Satterthwaite Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-8553
E-Mail: cameron.satterthwaite@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE94

View Related DocumentsTitle: Pipeline Safety: Operator Qualification, Cost Recovery and other Pipeline Safety Proposed Changes (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would address miscellaneous issues that have been raised because of the reauthorization of the pipeline safety program in 2012 and petitions for rulemaking from many affected stakeholders. Some of the issues that this rulemaking would address include: renewal process for special permits, cost recovery for design reviews, and incident reporting.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 192; 49 CFR 195 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 60101 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Additional Information: SB-Y IC- N SLT-N;

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Governmental
Jurisdictions Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: John A Gale Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 0434
E-Mail: john.gale@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE97

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Failure to Pay Provision (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would respond to the enactment of Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21). MAP21 provides that PHMSA prohibit a person from conducting regulated hazardous material operations if the person fails to pay a civil penalty. The regulations must: (1) set forth procedures to require a person who is delinquent in paying civil penalties to cease any regulated activity until payment has been made or an acceptable payment plan has been arranged; and (2) ensures that the person is notified in writing and is given an opportunity to respond before the person is required to cease the activity.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 107 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 to 5108 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/24/2013 78 FR 58501

NPRM Comment Period End 11/25/2013

Additional Information: HM-258A

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Ben Supko Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of TransportationPipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553
E-Mail: ben.supko@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE99

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Special Permit Standard Operating Procedures and Evaluation

Abstract: This rulemaking is in response to the enactment of MAP 21. MAP 21 requires PHMSA to issue regulations that establish (1) standard operating procedures to support administration of the special permit and approval programs; and (2) objective criteria to support the evaluation of special permit and approval applications.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 107 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 to 5108 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2014

Additional Information: HM-233E

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Ben Supko Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553
E-Mail: ben.supko@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE38

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Compatibility with the Regulations of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the HMR requirements for the transportation of Class 7 (radioactive materials) based on recent changes contained in the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) regulations. This rulemaking would more fully align the HMR with the international standards and would update, clarify, correct and provide relief of certain regulatory requirements applicable to the transportation of radioactive materials.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 172; 49 CFR 173; 49 CFR 174; 49 CFR 175; 49 CFR 176; 49 CFR 177; 49 CFR 178; 49 CFR 171 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/12/2011 76 FR 50332NPRM Comment Period End 11/10/2011

Final Rule 02/00/2014

Additional Information: HM-250; SB - Y, IC - N, SLT - N; PHMSA initiated this rulemaking to harmonize with NRC and reduce regulatory burden. NRC's NPRM published May 16, 2013. PHMSA has coordinated with NRC to develop the final rule. Annualized cost estimate ranging from $161K-487K over a 5-year period at a 3 percent discount rate. This rulemaking may result in a decrease in the annual burden and costs of OMB Control Number 2137-0034 due to reductions in the shipping paper requirements for excepted quantizes of RAM shipments.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Steve Webb Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553
E-Mail: steven.webb@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE43

View Related Documents

Title: Pipeline Safety: Enforcement of State Excavation Damage Laws

Abstract: The PIPES Act provides PHMSA with the authority to enforce excavation damage laws in those States that have inadequate enforcement. This rulemaking would consider standards for excavators and operators to follow when conducting excavation in a vicinity of a pipeline and the administrative procedures to be used for enforcement proceedings.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 190 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 60101 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 10/29/2009 74 FR 55797

ANPRM Comment Period End 12/14/2009

NPRM Comment Period Extended 03/30/2012 77 FR 31827

NPRM 04/02/2012 77 FR 19800

NPRM Comment Period End 07/09/2012

Final Rule 03/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Tewabe Asebe Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 5523
E-Mail: tewabe.asebe@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE44View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Revisions to Requirements for the Transportation of Lithium Batteries

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the Hazardous Materials Regulations to comprehensively address the safe transportation of lithium cells and batteries. The intent of the rulemaking is to strengthen the current regulatory framework by imposing more effective safeguards, including design testing to address risks related to internal short circuits, and enhanced packaging, hazard communication, and operational measures for various types and sizes of lithium batteries in specific transportation contexts. The rulemaking would respond to several recommendations issued by the National Transportation Safety Board.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 171; 49 CFR 172; 49 CFR 173; 49 CFR 175 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/11/2010 75 FR 1302

NPRM Comment Period End 03/12/2010

Notice 04/11/2012 77 FR 21714

Comment Period End 05/11/2012
NPRM; Request for Additional Comments 01/07/2013 78 FR 1119

Comment Period End 03/08/2013

Final Rule 12/00/2013

Additional Information: HM-224F

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kevin Leary Transportation Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-8553
E-Mail: kevin.leary@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE53

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Safety Requirements for External Product Piping on Cargo Tanks Transporting Flammable Liquids (Wetlines)

Abstract: The rulemaking would amend the Hazardous Materials Regulations to prohibit flammable liquids from being transported in unprotected product piping on existing and newly manufactured DOT specification cargo tank motor vehicles.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 173 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 to 5128, 44701; 49 CFR 1.45, 1.53 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/27/2011 76 FR 4847

NPRM Comment Period Extended 03/17/2011 76 FR 14643

NPRM Comment Period End 03/28/2011

End of Extension of Comment Period 04/27/2011Final Rule 09/00/2014

Additional Information: HM-213D

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Business Federalism: No Energy Affected: Yes

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Dirk Der Kinderen Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553
E-Mail: Dirk.DerKinderen@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE59

View Related Documents

Title: Pipeline Safety: Miscellaneous Amendments to the Pipeline Safety Regulations

Abstract: This rulemaking would make minor changes to various provisions in the pipeline safety regulations to help clarify them by making editorial corrections, correcting inconsistent regulatory language, and responding to several petitions for rulemaking, such as providing for an updated standard. The primary intended effect of this rule is to enhance the accuracy and reduce misunderstandings of the regulations. The amendments contained in this rule are non-substantive changes.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 191; 49 CFR 192; 49 CFR 195 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 60137 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/29/2011 76 FR 73570

NPRM Comment Period End 02/03/2012

Comment Period Extended 02/03/2012 77 FR 5472

Final Rule 08/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: John A Gale Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 0434
E-Mail: john.gale@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE82

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Incorporation of Certain Special Permits and Competent Authorities into the HMR (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) to incorporate provisions contained in certain widely used or longstanding special permits and competent authorities that have established safety records.Incorporating such provisions into the HMR is intended to provide wider access to the regulatory flexibility offered in the special permits and competent authorities. The adoption of the provisions would eliminate the need for numerous application andrenewal requests. The special permits proposed to be added to the regulations here would allow the transportation of "Selfheating" solid, organic n.o.s. (spent bleaching earth) in sift-proof bulk packaging; would allow the use of regulated medical waste shipping names and markings that differ from those prescribed in the HMR; would allow for the transportation of Class 9 solid coal pitch compounds in non-specification open top or closed-top sift-proof metal cans or fiber drums; and would allow for the transportation of self-inflating lifesaving appliances that contain non-specification steel cylinders when being transported between a vessel and an authorized facility for servicing. This rulemaking action would facilitate commerce activity and reduce paperwork burdens while maintaining an appropriate level of safety. Incorporation of these provisions would reduce the compliance burden and cost on both industry and government.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 107; 49 CFR 172; 49 CFR 173; 49 CFR 178; 49 CFR 175 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/22/2012 77 FR 64450

NPRM Comment Period End 12/21/2012

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Additional Information: HM-233C; SB - N, SLT - N, IC - N; This final rule will incorporate over 20 special permits and competent authority approvals into regulations. It will provide an economic benefit to the hazardous materials transportation industry as a whole while maintaining an appropriate level of safety. We estimate that this final rule will reduce the paperwork burden identified under OMB Control No. 2137-0051 by $4,682 per year. PHMSA will also have nominal savings since it will no longer need to process, review, and maintain these special permits and CA approvals.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Steven Andrews Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553
E-Mail: steven.andrews@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AF00

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Incorporation of Special Permits Into the Hazardous Materials Regulations (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking addresses Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21), in which the Act requires an initial review and analysis of special permits that have been in continuous effect for a 10-year period to determine which ones may be converted into the hazmat regulations. MAP-21 also requires the issuance of regulations to incorporate into the hazmat regulations any special permits identified in the initial review and analysis that PHMSA determines are appropriate for incorporation based on the review factors, which this rule proposes. Factors the rule considers: (1) the safety record of hazmat transported under the special permit; (2) the application of a special permit; (3) the suitability of provisions in the special permit for incorporation into the hazmat regulations; and (4) rulemaking activity in related areas. This rulemaking is the first in a series of rulemakings to incorporate aged Special Permits.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 172; 49 CFR 173; 49 CFR 174; 49 CFR 175; 49 CFR 176; 49 CFR 177; 49 CFR 178; 49 CFR 179; 49
CFR 180 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 to 5128 Legal Deadline:Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory This rulemaking is required by section 33012(b) of MAP-21, and must be codified into the 49 CFR by 10/1/2015 10/01/2015

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2014

Additional Information: HM-233F

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Glenn Foster Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553
E-Mail: Glenn.Foster@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE62

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Approval and Communication Requirements for the Safe Transportation of Air Bag Inflators, Air Bag Modules, and Seat-Belt Pretensioners (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking revises the Hazardous Materials Regulations applicable to air bag inflators, air bag modules, and seat-belt pretensioners. This rulemaking incorporates into the regulations the provisions of certain special permits with proven safety records. The rulemaking also revises the current approval and documentation requirements for a material appropriately classified as a UN3268 air bag inflator, air bag module, or seat-belt pretensioner. These revisions reduce the regulatory burden on the automotive industry while maintaining the current level of safety.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 172; 49 CFR 173 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 to 5128 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/26/2012 77 FR 17394

NPRM Comment Period End 05/25/2012

Final Rule 07/30/2013 78 FR 45880

Final Rule Effective 08/29/2013

Additional Information: HM-254; SB - Y, IC - Y, SLT - N; PHMSA initiated this rulemaking to reduce the burden on industry from applying for special permits for practices with an established safety record. This final rule should provide savings of at least $1.14 million annually to the automotive industry and the Government. Some of the savings derive from: 1) a decrease of $18,000.00 in the annual burden and costs under OMB Control Number 2137-0051 due to incorporating provisions contained in certain widely-used or longstanding special permits that have an established safety record, 2) a decrease of $11,385.00 in the annual burden and cost to OMB Control Number 2137-0557 due to the larger cost savings of reducing the number of approvals required by testers of air bags and air bag modules, and 3) a decrease of approximately $890,000 in the annual burden and cost to shippers no longer being required to put the EX numbers on shipping papers for air bag modules.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Matthew Nickels Transportation Regulations SpecialistDepartment of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553
E-Mail: matthew.nickels@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE69

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Highway-Rail Grade Crossing; Safe Clearance

Abstract: PHMSA and FMCSA would amend the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) and Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSR) to prohibit a motor vehicle driver from entering onto a highway-rail grade crossing unless there is sufficient space to drive completely through the grade crossing without stopping. This action is in response to Section 112 of the Hazardous Materials Transportation Authorization Act of 1994 and the intent of this rulemaking is to reduce highway-rail grade crossing crashes.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 177; 49 CFR 392 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101; 49 USC 5103 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/28/2011 76 FR 5120

NPRM Comment Period End 03/29/2011

NPRM Comment Period Reopened 03/30/2011 76 FR 17615

NPRM Comment Period Reopened End 04/29/2011

Final Rule 09/25/2013 78 FR 58915

Final Rule Effective 10/25/2013

Additional Information: HM-255; FMCSA Docket #: FMCSA-2006-25660; FMCSA RIN #: 2126-AB04

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Previously Reported as 2126 -AB04 Agency Contact: Ben Supko Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553
E-Mail: ben.supko@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE70

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Revision of Requirements for Fireworks Approvals (RRR)

Abstract: This rulemaking amends the HMR by revising and clarifying requirements for the examination, testing, certification,and transportation of certain Division 1.4G consumer fireworks (UN0336 Fireworks). Further, this rulemaking establishes DOTapproved fireworks certification agencies that provide an alternative to the approval process for Division 1.4G consumer fireworks. PHMSA also revises the procedural regulations pertaining to certification agencies. These actions clarify regulations with respect to PHMSA’s fireworks approval process and provide regulatory flexibility in seeking authorization for the transportation of Division 1.4G consumer fireworks.Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 171; 49 CFR 107; 49 CFR 171; 49 CFR 172; 49 CFR 173 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5103 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/30/2012 77 FR 52636

NPRM Comment Period End 10/29/2012

Final Rule 07/16/2013 78 FR 42457

Final Rule Effective 08/15/2013

Additional Information: HM-257; SB -Y, IC-Y, SLT-N PHMSA estimates total annual benefits of this final rule will be between approximately $14.5 million and $26.5 million, and total annual costs will be between $4 million and $7 million, resulting in total annual net benefits of between $11 million and $19 million. PHMSA identified this initiative through an internal review.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Robert Benedict Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553
E-Mail: robert.benedict@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE92

View Related Documents

Title: Pipeline Safety: Pipeline Safety Enforcement and Regulatory Procedures

Abstract: The "Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011" created a number of regulatory mandates, some of which directly implicate the pipeline enforcement and regulatory procedures outlined in 49 CFR part 190. This rulemaking would comply with statutory mandates related to part 190 through amendment. Specifically, this rule would update and clarify the purpose of part 190, clarify certain enforcement issues including but not limited to procedures for hearings, special permit condition violations, incorporation of new civil penalties, and procedures for adoption of rules. This rule would also include certain amendments that conform current regulatory language to actual practice or correct errors and omissions.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 190 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 60101 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/13/2012 77 FR 48112

NPRM Comment Period End 09/12/2012

Final Rule 09/25/2013 78 FR 58897

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Vanessa Allen Sutherland Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202 366-9106
E-Mail: vanessa.sutherland@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AE98

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Resumption of Transportation (MAP-21)

Abstract: This rulemaking would respond to the enactment of Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21). MAP21 requires regulations that address: (1) the safe and expeditious resumption of transportation of perishable hazardous material, including radio-pharmaceuticals and other medical products, that may require timely delivery due to life-threatening situations; (2) the means by which non-compliant packages are placed out-of-service or the resumption of transportation of compliant packages; (3) appropriate training and equipment for inspectors; and (4) the proper closure of packagings in accordance with the hazmat regulations.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 109 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 to 5108 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/22/2013 78 FR 30258

NPRM Comment Period End 07/22/2013

Final Rule 10/02/2013 78 FR 60755

Final Rule Effective 11/01/2013

Additional Information: HM-258B

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Ben Supko Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553
E-Mail: ben.supko@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AF01

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Corrections and Response to Appeals (HM-215K, HM-215L, HM-218G and HM-219)

Abstract: PHMSA recently published final rules under Docket numbers: (1) PHMSA-2009-0126 (HM-215K) [January 7, 2013; 78 FR 1101]; (2) PHMSA-2012-0027 (HM-215L) [January 7, 2013; 78 FR 987]; (3) PHMSA-2011-0142 (HM-219) [March 7, 2013; 78 FR 14702]; and (4) PHMSA-2011-0138 (HM-218G) [March 11, 2013; 78 FR 15303]. This final rule responds to appeals submitted by persons affected by those final rules. In addition, this final rule amends certain requirements by making editorial corrections to changes made by the final rules.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 171; 49 CFR 172; 49 CFR 173; 49 CFR 175; 49 CFR 178; 49 CFR 180 (To search for a specific CFR,

visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 to 5128 Legal Deadline: NoneTimetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 10/31/2013 78 FR 65454

Final Rule Effective 10/31/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2137- AE83; Related to 2137- AE87; Related to 2137- AE78; Related to 2137- AE79 Agency Contact: Aaron Wiener Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553
E-Mail: Aaron.Wiener@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AF02

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Penalty Guidelines

Abstract: In this final rule, PHMSA is publishing an updated statement of policy, revising appendix A to part 107, subpart D, including the List of Frequently Cited Violations in part II of the guidelines, as well as part III and IV, which provide additional factors that affect penalty amounts. Revisions to part II include modifications to individual baseline assessments, additional frequently cited violations not previously included in the guidelines, and replacing penalty ranges with assigned penalties based on safety risks such as packing group, where appropriate. The revisions to parts III and IV of the guidelines clarify the criteria PHMSA considers when determining a civil penalty amount that appropriately reflects the risk posed by a violation, the culpability of the respondent, and any aggravating or mitigating factors.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 107 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 to 5108 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule Effective 10/01/2013

Final Rule 10/02/2013 78 FR 60726

Additional Information: HM-258C

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Ben Supko Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553
E-Mail: ben.supko@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT)Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ( PHMSA ) RIN: 2137-AF03

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Materials: Minor Editorial Corrections and Clarifications

Abstract: This final rule corrects editorial errors, makes minor regulatory changes and, in response to requests for clarification, improves the clarity of certain provisions in the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR parts 171-180). The intended effect of this rule is to enhance the accuracy and reduce misunderstandings of the regulations. The amendments contained in this rule are non-substantive changes and do not impose new requirements.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 171; 49 CFR 172; 49 CFR 173; 49 CFR 175; 49 CFR 178 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 5101 to 5128 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule Effective 10/01/2013

Final Rule 10/02/2013 78 FR 60745

Additional Information: HM-244F

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Neal Suchak Transportation Regulations Specialist Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 8553
E-Mail: neal.suchak@dot.gov

Department of Transportation (DOT) Research and Innovative Technologies Administration ( RITA ) RIN: 2139-AA13

View Related Documents

Title: Reporting Ancillary Airline Passenger Revenues

Abstract: This rulemaking would collect more detailed revenue information regarding airline imposed fees from those air carriers meeting the definition of "large certificated air carriers." Many air carriers have adopted fees for such services as checked baggage, carry-on baggage, meals, on-board entertainment, internet connections, pillows, blankets, early boarding, canceling or changing reservations, unaccompanied minors, pet transportation, etc. The rulemaking would also change the way the Department computes mishandled baggage rates from mishandled baggage reports per domestic enplanement to mishandled bags per checked bags.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 14 CFR 234; 14 CFR 241 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 49 USC 329; 41708 and 41709 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/15/2011 76 FR 41726

NPRM Comment Period End 09/13/2011

NPRM Comment Period End 09/13/2011
Public Meeting 05/17/2012 77 FR 25105

Final Rule 07/00/2014Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Marianne Seguin Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technologies Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 Washington , DC 20590
Phone: 202-366- 1457
E-Mail: marianne.seguin@dot.gov