alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of APP Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas H. Silberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 4, 2008 |  | /S/ Thomas H. Silberg  
|                     |  | Thomas H. Silberg      
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification
will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         CALLISTO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

FORM 10-QSB/A FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the Principal Financial Officer of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in
connection with the Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
2003 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-QSB").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-QSB/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: December 1, 2003




                                        /s/ Bernard F. Denoyer
                                        -------------------
                                        Bernard F. Denoyer
                                        Principal Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 21, 2018

a1217 

# Order

Clerk December 21, 2018

157763

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 157763

COA: 342361

Grand Traverse CC: 2017

- 012676

- FC

DEANDRE MARCUS JONES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 26, 2018 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

No. 84374 JILL MARS ON, Appellant,

vs. SAMUEL MARSON, 

# FILED Respondent. 

### APR 2 9 2022 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK4.1PREME COURT OEM l igf e CLER " Vr

ORDER DISMISSING APPPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order denying appellant's motion to enforce or show cause regarding contempt for respondent's alleged failure to pay alimony. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Dixie Grossman, Judge.

Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. SeeNRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order regarding the failure to pay alimony. Further, a contempt order is not independently appealable. See Pengilly v.Rancho Santa Fe Homeowners Ass'ri. 116 Nev. 646, 649, 5 P.3d 569, 671

(2000). This court lacks jurisdiction and therefore

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Silver 

## • J. Cadish 

# Pickm Pickering

cc: Hon. Dixie Grossman, District Judge Jill Marson Allison W. Joffee Washoe District Court Clerk

2
United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Electronic Docket Index for 

[EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0064] 

Revision of Air Quality Implementation Plan; California; 

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District; 

Stationary Source Permits 

Docket Index 

Category/ Item Number

I. SIP Submittal Documents

ß SIP submittal letter from CARB, dated September 26, 2012 I-A 

ß Rule 214 amended on August 23, 2012 I-B 

ß Rule 217 adopted on August 23, 2012 I-C 

ß SMAQMD, Final Staff Report, Rules 214 and 217, July 23, 2012 I-D 

II. Federal Register Notices 

ß 50 FR 25417 (June19,1985) Final SIP approval of Rule 202 II-A 

ß 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992) General Preamble for Title I – 1990 Amendments II-B 

ß 75 FR 24409 (May 5, 2010) EPA’s reclassification of the Sacramento Metro Air Basin II-C 

ß 76 FR 28942 (May 19, 2011) NPRM Rules 203 and 214 II-D 

ß 76 FR 43183 (July 20, 2011) NFRM Rules 203 and 214 II-E 

III. Other Relevant Documents

ß Technical Support Document for SMAQMD Rules 214 & 217, dated January 23, 2013 III-A 

ß Technical Support Document for SMAQMD Rules 214 & 203, dated May 6, 2011 III-B 

ß SMAQMD Rule 214 – Federal New Source Review, adopted October 28, 2010 III-C 

IV. EPA Rulemaking Documents 

ß Federal Register Notice of Proposed Rulemaking dated February 14, 2013 (78 FR xxx) 

ß Reserved FR NFRM 

Notes:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1








               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS






The Board of Directors
Ledger Capital Corp.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the subject registration statement
(No. 33-80-700) on Form S-8 of Ledger Capital Corp. of our report dated August
3, 2001, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of
Ledger Capital Corp. and subsidiary as of June 30, 2001 and 2000, and the
related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2001, which report
appears in the June 30, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Ledger Capital Corp.


                                                                  /s/  KPMG LLP



Milwaukee, Wisconsin
September 12, 2001
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Form S-8 No. 333-14933, Form S-8 No. 333-40899, Form S-8 No. 333-47782, FormS-8 No. 333-70196, Form S-8 No. 333-74852 and S-8No. 333-101509) pertaining to the Digene Corporation Omnibus Plan, the Digene Corporation Directors’Stock Option Plan, the Digene Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan, and theDigene Corporation Amended and Restated 1999 Incentive Plan and in theRegistration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-91461, Form S-3 No. 333-83038, FormS-3 No. 333-83540 and Form S-3 No. 333-100555) of our report dated August 15,2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofDigene Corporation included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended June 30, 2003.           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP  
McLean, Virginia
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies(the “Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ John Kang                      |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|
| John Kang, Chief Executive Officer |
| December 17, 2004                  |

 

1

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2745

MARVIN CRIGGER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED MINE WORKERS HEALTH &

RETIREMENT FUNDS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge.

(CA-98-79)

Submitted: April 30, 1999 Decided: May 21, 1999

Before WILKINS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John M. Lamie, BROWNING, LAMIE & SHARP, P.C., Abingdon, Virginia,

for Appellant. Glenda S. Finch, Deputy General Counsel,

Christopher F. Clarke, Assistant General Counsel, UMWA HEALTH &

RETIREMENT FUNDS, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Marvin Crigger appeals the district court’s order

granting the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment in this action

arising under Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security

Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001-1168 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)

(“ERISA”). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Crigger v. Trustees UMWA, No.

CA-98-79 (W.D. Va. Oct. 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BETHANN ZAMPERINI,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 170 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of December, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the quarterly report of First National Energy Corporation (the "Registrant"), on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date, I, Gregory Sheller, as Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





FIRST NATIONAL ENERGY CORPORATIONDated: June  9, 2011
By:
/s/ Gregory ShellerGregory Sheller

Chief Executive Officer





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001011451
<NAME> MECHANICAL DYNAMICS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          16,843
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,154
<ALLOWANCES>                                       261
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,609
<PP&E>                                           7,225
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,551
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,175
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,332
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,247
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,575
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    272
<INCOME-TAX>                                       479
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (217)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (217)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6558]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   ADJOURNMENT UNTIL 12 NOON TOMORROW

  Mr. MERKLEY. If there is no further business to come before the 
Senate, I ask unanimous consent it adjourn under the previous order.
  There being no objection, the Senate, at 8:21 p.m., adjourned until 
Friday, September 21, 2012, at 12 noon.

                          ____________________
```
##### 



Exhibit 31.1  Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 302)
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Playlogic Entertainment, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and to the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
fulfilling the equivalent function):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  By: /s/ Willem M. SmitWillem M. SmitChief Executive Officer,President and Director
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-29010]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 5, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 27, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 161 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-149, CP2024-155.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-29010 Filed 1-4-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALEX CENICEROS

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 22

- 00156

- C R

Appeal from the

171st Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20170D03795 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgments. We therefore affirm the judgments of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO O RDERED THIS 2 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
T he a t t a c he d d o c u me n t s i n c l u de a ll c omm un i c a t i o n s r e l a t e d t o t h e

i n t e r a g en c y r e v i e w

. C o mm e n t s f ro m O M B

, r e s p on s e s a n d r e v i s i o n s t o

do c u me n t s b a s e d o n t h i s r e v i e w a r e i n c l ud e d

.
#### W. G. WHITTINGTON, Petitioner, v. TIDAL OIL COMPANY, now Tidewater Oil Company, and the State Industrial Commission of the State of Oklahoma, Respondents.

No. 36665.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Feb. 1, 1955.

W. G. Whittington, Miami, pro se.

Harry D. Page, Tulsa, and Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondents.

WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice.

W. G. Whittington, claimant, brought this proceeding to review an order of the State Industrial Commission denying him an award in a proceeding wherein he sought a further award against the employer, Tidal Oil Company, (now Tide Water Oil Company) on the ground of a change of condition. The petition to review states that it seeks to review an order dated October 3, 1923. It was filed October 5, 1954.

Answer in the nature of a motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason the proceeding was not commenced within 30 days after October 3, 1923. The motion to dismiss must be sustained. No record of the proceedings before the trial commissioner or the Commission en banc has been presented to this Court. This court has many times held that a proceeding to review an order or award of the State Industrial Commission not commenced within the statutory period set out in 85 O.S.1951 § 29 will be dismissed for the reason this Court is without jurisdiction of such proceeding. Oklahoma R. Co. v. State Industrial Commission, 147 Okl. 129, 295 P. 216; Adams v. Loffland Bros., 202 Okl. 496, 215 P.2d 826.

At the time the order was made the statute provided for the commencement of proceedings within thirty days. Since the proceeding was not commenced within the time allowed by law the motion to dismiss must be sustained and the proceeding dismissed.

It is so ordered.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
             August 14, 2008
    
    /s/ Jeffrey T. HansonDate
    
    Jeffrey T. HansonPresident
Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors, LLC,
the Manager of NNN 2002 Value Fund, LLC(principal executive officer)