alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Q of MeriStar Hospitality
Operating Partnership, L.P. (the Registrant) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the
capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 5, 2005 |  | /s/ Donald D. Olinger                           
|                     |  | Donald D. Olinger                               
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer                         
|                     |  | MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P.
|                     |  | MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp.              
|                     |  | MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. II           
|                     |  | MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. III
#### EMMA M. AMES, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. SHEFFIELD FARMS COMPANY, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, LICENSED TO DO BUSINESS IN NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT.

Argued September 27, 1948

Decided October 11, 1948.

*12*Mr. Perry E. Belfatto*argued the cause for the prosecutor-appellant.

*Mr. Isidor Kalisch*argued the cause for the respondent *(Mr. Henry M. Grosman*on the brief, *Messrs. Kalisch & Kalisch,*attorneys).

Per Curiam.

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case wherein payment is sought under the act for the death of petitioner-appellant’s decedent due to cardiac failure.

In the Bureau judgment was entered in favor of appellant. On appeal to the Essex Pleas that judgment was reversed and the petition dismissed. On certiorari the former Supreme Court affirmed. This appeal is from that judgment.

A recital of the facts, which admittedly were not in dispute, will serve no useful purpose.

A review of the medical testimony demonstrates that it preponderated heavily in favor of respondent. There is a presumption that any death from heart disease is the result of natural causes. “The law places the burden of proof on the petitioner for compensation; and it is not sustained unless the evidence preponderates in favor of the tendered hypothesis. That must be a rational inference, i. e., based upon a preponderance of probabilities according to the common experience of mankind. It is required to be a probable or more probable hypothesis with reference to the possibility of other hypotheses”. *Lohndorf v. Peper Bros. Paint Co.,*134 *N. J. L.*156*(Sup. Ct. 1946)*aff’d 135 *N. J. L.*352*(E. & A.*1947. J The appellant did not meet the test thus laid down.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is accordingly affirmed.

*For affirmance:*Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling and Ackerson—7.

*For reversal:*None.
Exhibit
99.1





Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Nexstar Finance, L.L.C. and Nexstar Finance, Inc. (together, the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended March 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Dated: May 15, 2003 |  | /S/    PERRY A. SOOK                                               
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | Perry A. Sook                                                      
|                    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1449

DERRICK HUGH DEHANEY,

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A24-359-931)

Submitted: February 11, 1997 Decided: March 25, 1997

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Kantor, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Frank W.

Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, William J. Howard, Vernon Benet

Miles, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT

OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Derrick Dehaney petitions for review of a final order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his application for a

waiver of inadmissibility. Dehaney does not dispute that he was

properly found deportable based on his violation of controlled

substance laws. He challenges only the findings of the Board and

the Immigration Judge that he was not entitled to a waiver of

deportability.

Section 440(a) of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death

Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Sat. 1214,

which amends section 106(a)(10) of the Immigration and Nationalty

Act (INA), provides that final orders of deportability based on

the alien's violation of controlled substance laws are no longer

subject to judicial review. See Kolster v. INS, 101 F.3d 785, 789-

90 (1st Cir. 1996); Salazar-Haro v. INS, 95 F.3d 309, 310-11 (3d

Cir. 1996) (citing additional cases). Accordingly, we dismiss this

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Marine Amazon Construction Company ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W919QA-11-C-0076 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60658 

Mr. Shiraqa Raoufi 

President 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ Julie A. Glascott, JA 

Trial Attorney 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE STEMPLER 

ON THE GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 

STATEMENT OF FACTS FOR PURPOSES OF THE MOTION 

On 1July2016, appellant filed a notice of appeal with the Board, seeking payment 

under the contract. The appeal was docketed as ASBCA No. 60658. On 4 August 2016, 

the government moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, alleging that 

appellant did not submit a claim to the contracting officer prior to filing the appeal. The 

government's motion provided appellant with the address of the contracting officer if 

appellant wished to file a claim. In a 9 September 2016 email to the Board, appellant 

stated, in part, that "[ w ]e are agree with your office for motion, and also please let the 

contracting officer maker her decision." 

By order dated 14 September 2016, the Board directed appellant to clarify whether 

it concurred with the government's motion and that it desired to submit a claim to the 

contracting officer. In an email dated 22 September 2016, appellant responded that it had 

submitted a certified claim to the contracting officer on 19 July 2016 but did not receive a 

decision. The Board treated this correspondence as a notice of appeal from the 

contracting officer's failure to issue a final decision on appellant's alleged 19 July claim, 

and docketed the appeal as ASBCA No. 60814 on 26 September 2016. 

The Board's jurisdiction under the Contract Disputes Act is dependent upon the 

contractor's submission of a proper claim to the contracting officer for a final decision. 

41U.S.C.§7103(a); CCIE & Co., ASBCA Nos. 58355, 59008, 14-1BCAii35,700 

at 17 4,816. Appellant has conceded that it did not submit a claim to the contracting 
officer prior to filing this appeal. Thus, the Board lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the 

appeal. This appeal is dismissed without prejudice to the prosecution of ASBCA 

No. 60814. 

Dated: 4 October 2016 

I concur 

1fVL 

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

ive Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60658, Appeal of Marine Amazon 

Construction Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 08-1880

IN RE: GRAND JURY

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on May 11, 2009, is amended

as follows:

On p. 23, footnote 9, line 7: Replace "Answer is

directly." with "Answer it directly."
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H6235-H6236]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              LET'S STAY IN WASHINGTON AND FINISH THE JOB

  (Mr. WITTMAN asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. WITTMAN. Mr. Speaker, Americans continue to look for work, to put 
food on the table, and to ensure their

[[Page H6236]]

children have proper school supplies as fall comes into full swing. Yet 
the House is set to leave Washington today with many items on its to-do 
list.
  While Congress finishes up the work to pass a budget to fund the 
Federal Government, catastrophic cuts loom on the horizon, set to hit 
in January of 2013. Leaving these cuts unresolved is unconscionable. 
Not only is this the wrong message to send to the American people, it's 
simply not the right thing to do. Our all-volunteer force is at war, 
and these cuts threaten our national security. Furthermore, they 
threaten over 200,000 jobs in Virginia.
  Nine days remain before the new fiscal year begins. Congress should 
do the right thing and stay in Washington instead of ignoring the 
reality and delaying tough decisions. It's time to put governing over 
politics. Let's stay in Washington and finish the job that we were 
elected and expected to do.

                          ____________________
```
VI

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1515

For the relief of Benjamin M. Banfro.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 3, 1996

Mr. CRAIG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Benjamin M. Banfro.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

4 In the administration of the Immigration and Nation5 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Benjamin M. Banfro

6 shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admit7 ted to the United States for permanent residence as of

8 the date of the enactment of this Act upon payment of

9 the required visa fees.

10 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

11 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Ben12 jamin M. Banfro as provided in this Act, the Secretary
2

S 1515 IS

1 of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by one

2 number during the current fiscal year the total number

3 of immigrant visas available to natives of the country of

4 the alien’s birth under subsection (a) of section 203 of

5 the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153).

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. §1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Lawson Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John J. Coughlan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | /s/ JOHN J. COUGHLANJohn J. Coughlan President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | January 8, 2004                                                           
| |  |                                                                           

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Lawson Software, Inc. and will be retained by Lawson Software, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

43

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6277]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Ms. BONAMICI:
       H.R. 6483.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 3
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1508 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1508

        To assure that all Federal employees work and are paid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 22, 1995

  Mr. Dole (for himself, Mr. Warner, and Mr. Stevens) introduced the 
following bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, 
                               and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To assure that all Federal employees work and are paid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALL FEDERAL EMPLOYEES DEEMED TO BE ESSENTIAL EMPLOYEES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1342 of title 31, United States Code, is 
amended for the period December 15, 1995, through February 1, 1996--
            (1) by inserting after the first sentence ``All officers 
        and employees of the United States Government or the District 
        of Columbia government shall be deemed to be performing 
        services relating to emergencies involving the safety of human 
        life or the protection of property.''; and
            (2) by striking out the last sentence.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5053 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5053

    To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to support innovative 
                        technology partnerships.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2018

 Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to support innovative 
                        technology partnerships.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Coding Technology Improvements 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SUPPORT OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIPS.

    Section 744(c) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1138c(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) Support of innovative technology partnerships, 
        through grants to encourage increased innovation in higher 
        education programs that are offered through partnerships 
        between institutions of higher education and nontraditional 
        providers not traditionally eligible to participate in title IV 
        programs, and that are approved by a quality assurance entity 
        (which meets the requirements for such an entity described in 
        the notice published in the Federal Register by the Department 
        of Education on October 15, 2015 (80 Fed. Reg. 62047 et seq.)), 
        including programs on coding, high-technology software, or 
        computer science. Such grants may be used to assist in 
        assessing whether such partnerships--
                    ``(A) increase access to innovative and effective 
                educational programs, particularly for students from 
                low-income backgrounds;
                    ``(B) assess quality assurance processes 
                appropriate for the nontraditional providers and 
                programs described in this paragraph; and
                    ``(C) identify ways to protect students and 
                taxpayers from risk, including lack of employment or 
                increase of personal debt.''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    August 14, 2007
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Courtney A. BrowerDate
    
    
    
    
    
    Courtney A. BrowerChief Accounting Officer(principal accounting officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

November 12, 2003

Cooper Industries, Ltd.
600 Travis, Suite 5800
Houston, Texas 77002-1001

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of Cooper Industries, Ltd. (the "Company") and/or Cooper Industries,
Inc., as applicable, and in each related Prospectus of the use of our name and
the reference to an analysis, with which our firm assisted, concerning the
contingent liability exposure of the Company for certain asbestos-related
claims, under "Part I; Item 1. Financial Statements; Note 12. Asbestos
Liabilities", and under "Part II - Other Information; Item 1. Legal Proceedings"
included in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003.

No. 2-33-14542      Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc.
                    1989 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

No. 333-02847       Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc.
                    Amended and Restated Directors Stock Plan

No. 333-64400       Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc.
                    Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan

No. 333-24237       Form S-3D Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc.
                    Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

No. 333-101451      Form S-3D Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Ltd.
                    Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

No. 333-51439       Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc.
                    Director's Retainer Fee Stock Plan

No. 333-51441       Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc.
                    Amended and Restated Management Annual Incentive Plan

No. 333-37580       Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper (UK) Employee
                    Share Purchase Plan

No. 333-75475       Form S-3 Registration Statement for a shelf registration to
                    issue up to $500 million of debt securities

No. 333-99581       Form S-3 Registration Statement for a shelf registration to
                    issue a guarantee of up to $500 million of debt securities

Sincerely,

/s/ Charles E. Bates, Ph.D.

Charles E. Bates, Ph.D.
President and Senior Partner
Bates White, LLC
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARIO ANTONIO RAMON

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00237

- CR

Appeal from the

290th Judicial District Court

of Bexar County , Texas

Cause No. 2021CR5632

J U D G M E N T

T he Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance

.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 10 TH DAY OF APRIL 2024.

G INA M. PALAFOX

, Justice

Before Alley , C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2


I, Jaren Chan, CEO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Myoffiz,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant is made known to us by others within the Corporation,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.






   January 14, 2004               /s/    Jaren Chan
                                  -------------------------
                                  Jaren Chan
                                  Chief Executive Officer