alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 507 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 507

  To require zero-based budgeting for departments and agencies of the 
                              Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2017

   Mr. Ross introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require zero-based budgeting for departments and agencies of the 
                              Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Zero-based Budgeting Ensures 
Responsible Oversight (ZERO) Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. ZERO-BASED BUDGETING.

    Section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i)(1) The President shall submit with materials related to each 
budget transmitted under subsection (a) on or after January 1, 2019, a 
budget for each department and agency which contains the following 
information:
            ``(A) A description of each activity for which the 
        department or agency receives an appropriation in the current 
        fiscal year or for which the department or agency requests an 
        appropriation for the budget year.
            ``(B) The legal basis for each activity.
            ``(C) For each activity, three alternative funding levels 
        for the budget year, and a summary of the priorities that would 
        be accomplished within each level, and the additional 
        increments of value that would be added by the higher funding 
        levels. At least two of these funding levels shall be below the 
        funding level for the current fiscal year.
            ``(D) For each activity, one or more measures of its cost 
        efficiency and effectiveness.
    ``(2) As soon as practicable, the Director of the Office of 
Management and Budget shall publish guidelines to carry out this 
subsection. The guidelines shall require that the baseline budget of 
each department or agency is assumed to be zero and each proposed 
expenditure shall be justified as if it were a new expenditure.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 8.1

SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

The table below sets forth all of our direct and
indirect significant subsidiaries and the percentage of equity of each subsidiary we owned directly or indirectly as of December 31, 2012:



|                                                                              |  |                              |           |  |                 |  |       |             |  |                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | --------- |  | --------------- |  | ----- | ----------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Name of Company                                                               |  | Jurisdiction ofIncorporation |           |  | PercentageOwned |  |       | Description
|Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V.                                                  |  |                              | Mexico    |  |                 |  | 100.0 | %           |  | Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.             
|                                                                              |  |                              |          
|Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V.(1)                 |  |                              | Mexico    |  |                 |  | 100.0 | %           |  | Holding company of manufacturers and distributors of beverages.
|                                                                              |  |                              |          
|Spal Industria Brasileira de Bebidas, S.A.                                    |  |                              | Brazil    |  |                 |  | 98.2  | %           |  | Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.             
|                                                                              |  |                              |          
|Coca-Cola FEMSA de Venezuela S.A. (formerly, Panamco Venezuela, S.A. de C.V.) |  |                              | Venezuela |  |                 |  | 100.0 | %           |  | Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.             
|                                                                              |  |                              |          
|Industria Nacional de Gaseosas, S.A.                                          |  |                              | Colombia  |  |                 |  | 100.0 | %           |  | Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.             



|(1) | On September 24, 2012, Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S.A. de C.V. was converted into Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V. (a
limited liability company).
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Exh. 8.1-1
EXHIBIT 99.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Geocom Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John E. Hiner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

  

/s/ John E. Hiner

___________________________

John E. Hiner

Chief Executive Officer

May 20, 2002
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6808

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TERRY LEE ROSEBORO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (5:00-cr-00014-ALL; 5:06-cv-00055)

Submitted: July 25, 2006 Decided: August 3, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Lee Roseboro, Appellant Pro Se. C. Nicks Williams, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Terry Lee Roseboro seeks to appeal the district court’s

order treating his 18 U.S.C. § 3661 (2000) and Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and

dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369

(4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Roseboro has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Roseboro’s notice of appeal and

informal brief as an application to file a second or successive

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Winestock, 340

F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to

file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims
- 3 -

based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously

unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on

collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously

discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to

establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for

constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the

movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255

(2000). Roseboro’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria.

Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255

motion. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the amended Quarterly  Report of Whistler Investments, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mehboob Charania, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant  to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with
the  requirements  of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) The information contained  in the Report fairly  presents, in  all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

                                                 /s/ Mehboob Charania
                                                ---------------------
                                                 Mehboob Charania
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

October 5, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the quarterly report of First National Energy Corporation (the "Registrant"), on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date, I, Gregory Sheller, as Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Date: October 31, 2012
By:
/s/ Gregory ShellerName: Gregory ShellerTitle:





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Whistler  Investments,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mehboob
Charania, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002,  that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                                 /s/ Mehboob Charania
                                                ---------------------
                                                 Mehboob Charania
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

September 13, 2004
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350
  1.
    
    The periodic report containing financial statements to which this certificate is an
exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
 2.
    
    The information contained in the periodic report to which this certificate is an
exhibit fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
   By:
    /s/ JEFFREY S. CARBIENERJeffrey S. CarbienerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1593-E1594]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            NATIONAL DAY FOR THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA ON TAIWAN

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. DAN BURTON

                               of indiana

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Mr. BURTON of Indiana. Mr. Speaker, on October 3, 2012, the Taipei 
Economic and Cultural Representative Office, located in Washington, DC, 
will be celebrating the 101st National Day of the Republic of China on 
Taiwan at the beautiful Twin Oaks Estate. I rise today in advance of 
this celebration to offer my continued praise and support of the U.S.-
Taiwanese relationship and to acknowledge the good work of Jason Yuan, 
who after serving four years as Taiwan's Washington Representative is 
returning to Taiwan to continue his distinguished career by serving as 
Secretary General of the National Security Council. Mr. Yuan has worked 
tirelessly to further the mutually beneficial relationship between the 
United States and Taiwan.
  As the people of the Republic of China on Taiwan celebrate the 101st 
anniversary of their nation's founding, I congratulate them on their 
National Day and would like to commend

[[Page E1594]]

them for more than 100 years of progress. As a good friend and ally of 
the United States, the Republic of China on Taiwan remains a peaceful 
and prosperous democracy, and is a model for nations around the world.
  I would like to take a moment and recognize the 23 million citizens 
of Taiwan for their commitment to peace. As a symbol of this 
commitment, the Republic of China on Taiwan recently melted down 
artillery shells and used the metal to construct a ``Peace Bell.'' 
President Ma Ying-jeou also proposed a peace initiative in the hope of 
easing the recent tensions in the East China Sea. The initiative calls 
on all parties concerned to show restraint, shelve controversies and 
settle disputes in a peaceful manner. It also urges all parties 
concerned to strive for a consensus on a code of conduct in the East 
China Sea, and to establish a mechanism for cooperation on exploring 
and developing resources in the region. We celebrate these efforts to 
maintain good relations with other countries, and the United States is 
proud to call the Republic of China on Taiwan a partner in peace.
  In closing, I hope my colleagues will join me in thanking Ambassador 
Yuan for his service along with President Ma, Vice President Wu, and 
the people of the Republic of China on Taiwan for their continued 
commitment to peace and democracy on this anniversary of their National 
Day. Although I am retiring from the United States House of 
Representatives, please be assured that my support, commitment and 
friendship to Taiwan will remain strong, and will never die.

                          ____________________
```
Essential Air Service at 

ATKA, ALASKA 

NIKOLSKI, ALASKA 

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq. 

March 30, 2012 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 ih Street S.W., Room 6401 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Sirs, 

Enclosed find Grant Aviation, Inc.'s proposal to provide Essential Air Service between Dutch Harbor, 

Alaska and the villages of Atka and Nikolski, Alaska for the period July1, 2012 through June 30, 2014. 

Our proposal is to provide three direct, nonstop flights per week between Dutch Harbor and Atka, and 

two direct, nonstop flights per week between Dutch harbor and Nikolski. 

The Aircraft to be utilized for this proposed service is a Beech Kingair B-200, a 9 seat, twin turbine 

engine, pressurized aircraft fully equipped for IFR flight. 

We look forward to working with you to provide this service. Please contact me at 907 529-6999 if you 

have further questions. 

Cost data follows. 

Sincerely, 

R. Bruce McGlasson, President, Grant Aviation, Inc. 

'"'i. --·, ""'\ 

-. 'u 
. . 

Atka 

Nikolski 

Revenue 

Atka + Nikolski EAS Proposal Summary 

Weekly Round Trips 

Annual Flights @ 100% completion 

Per flight Block Time 

Annual Block Hours 

Distance DUT- AKB (stat miles) 

Annual 0/W Passengers expected 

OW fare 

Annual maillbs expected 

Current mail rate I lb 

Annual Freight lbs expected 

Current Freight rates I lb 

Weekly Round Trips 

Annual Flights@ 100% completion 

Per flight Block Time 

Annual Block Hours 

Distance DUT- IKO 

Annual 0/W Passengers expected 

OW fare 

Annual maillbs expected 

Current mail rate I lb 

Annual Freight lbs expected 

Current Freight rates I lb 

Total Annual Block Hours 

Passenger Fares 

Mail Revenue 

Freight Revenue 

Total Revenue 

Direct Expense (Base) 

Fuel/oil ($/gallon) 

3 

156 

3.00 

468.00 

339 

511 

$ 267.00 

99,740 

$ 1.8491 

25,000 

$ 1.91 

2 

104 

1.25 

130.00 

116 

132 

$ 148.00 

20,020 

$ 0.9926 

25,000 

$ 0.65 

598.00 

Base 

$ 7.50 
. . 

Aircraft lease expense (monthly lease) 

Maintenance (engine&prop +labor+parts I block hr) 

Pilot labor, all inclusive @250iday + 30.00iflthour + tax&beni 

Aviation Insurance annual hull and liability 

Total Direct Expense 

Indirect Expense 

Hanger lease I month 

Ticketing & ground service I per turn 

Freight & mail Handling I lb Orig & Dest +post office transport 

Pilot housing+utility I month 

Total Indirect Expense 

Sum of direct and indirect costs 

Burden@ 17.2% 

Profit @ 5.0% 

Total Annual Economic cost 

Startup costs, first year only 

$ 15,000.00 

$ 532.00 

$ 250.00 

$ 4,000.00 

$ 300.00 

$ 0.18 

$ 1,800.00 

17.2% 

5.0% 
. ' 

Annual Revenue 

$ 155,973.00 

$ 204,301.09 

$ 64,000.00 

$ 424,274.09 

Annual Expense 

65,780 $ 345,345.00 
12 $ 

598 $ 

598 $ 

$ 

$ 

12 $ 

520 $ 

169,760 $ 

12 

180,000.00 

318,136.00 

126,660.40 

50,895.00 

1,021,036.40 

48,000.00 

156,000.00 

30,556.80 

21,600.00 

256,156.80 

1,277,193.20 

219,677.23 

1,496,870.43 

74,843.52 

1,571,713.95 

26,500.00
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**S an Antonio, Texas** 

December 31, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00791

- CV

Michael Thomas PAUL

, Appellant

v.

GREG ABBOT ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2001

- CI

- 16843

Honora ble Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

O n November 18, 2014, we issued an order explaining that the document appellant filed purporting to be a notice of appeal was defective and directing appellant to file a notice of appeal that complied with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.1(d) no later than thirty days from the date of our order. On December 15, 2014, appellant filed a notice of appeal that complies with Rule 25.1(d). See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.1(d).

On December 3, 2014, the trial court signed an order sustaining a contest to appellant’s

a ffidavit of indigence. To date, neither the clerk’s record nor the reporter’s record for this appeal

have been filed in this court. 1 We, therefore, ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court within ten days of the date of this order that the fe e for the clerk’s record has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the fee for the clerk’s record

. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

1 Only a limited clerk’s record and reporter’s record pertaining to the contest have been filed in this court.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 31st day of December, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF MAX RE CAPITAL LTD.



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 of Max Re Capital Ltd. (the Issuer).



I, Keith S. Hynes, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer certify that:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Dated: November 3, 2003



/s/ Keith S. HynesName: Keith S. Hynes
EXHIBIT 23.2

                         CONSENT OF MOORE STEVENS, P.C.

     As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the use
of our report dated February 20, 1996, included in this Form 10-K, into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statements, File Nos. 333-45879,
333-16901, 333-05395, 333-13033, and 333-13035.

     On July 1, 1996, the firm of Mortenson and Associates, P.C. changed its
name to Moore Stephens, P.C.

                                             MOORE STEPHENS, P.C.

                                             Certified Public Accounts

Cranford, New Jersey
April 13, 1998