alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No.333-08189 and No. 333-62659) pertaining to the AirNet Systems, Inc. Amended and Restated 1996Incentive Stock Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-116827) pertaining to theAirNet Systems, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated March 3, 2007, except for Note 4as to which the date is March 29, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andfinancial statement schedule of AirNet Systems, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) forthe year ended December 31, 2006. /s/ Ernst & Young LLPColumbus, OhioMarch 29, 2007
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 154

To prohibit the expenditure of appropriated funds on the Advanced Neutron

Source.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 5, 1995

Mr. BUMPERS (for himself, Mr. BRADLEY, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. HARKIN, Mr.

KOHL, Mr. SIMON, and Mr. WELLSTONE) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations

A BILL

To prohibit the expenditure of appropriated funds on the

Advanced Neutron Source.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Advanced Neutron

5 Source Termination Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF THE ADVANCED NEUTRON

7 SOURCE.

8 (a) PROHIBITION.—Effective 90 days after the date

9 of enactment of this section, no appropriated funds shall
2

S 154 IS

1 be available for the planning, construction and operation

2 of the Advanced Neutron Source.

3 (b) UNEXPENDED FUNDS.—Any funds appropriated

4 for the advanced Neutron Source that remain unexpended

5 and unobligated 90 days after the date of enactment of

6 this section shall be credited to the general revenues of

7 the United States Treasury.

Æ
EXHIBIT 31


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert S. Braswell IV, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Health Discovery
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

<PAGE>

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 14, 2004

/s/ Robert S. Braswell IV
-------------------------
Robert S. Braswell IV
Chief Administrative Officer
#### Carl MALONEY, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12202.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Nov. 16, *1955.*

A. W. Mauldin, Duncan, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

JONES, Presiding Judge.

Carl Maloney appealed from a conviction sustained in the District Court of Stephens County wherein he was sentenced to pay a fine of $1,000 in conformity to the verdict of a jury finding him guilty of driving an automobile on a highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, 3⁄8 subsequent offense.

No appearance has been made for the accused and no brief has been filed. The proceedings appear to be regular and the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction.

Affirmed.

BRETT and POWELL, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF REAL ESTATE INCOME PARTNERS III AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         860,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,313,000
<PP&E>                                      30,113,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,426,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          475,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,951,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,426,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,856,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,019,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               610,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,227,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,227,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    /s/    H.K. DesaiH.K. DesaiChief Executive Officer /s/    Anthony J. MassettiAnthony J. MassettiChief Financial Officer
ex10x2.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 


 



LOAN AGREEMENT












SERVICE TEAM INC


7121 Engineer Road


San Diego, California 92111


(855) 830-8111     FAX (858) 429--7665












August 25, 2011







N O T E


 


    This Agreement made on the 25th day of August, 2011, between Hallmark Venture Group, Inc. and Service Team Inc.


 


    Hallmark Venture Group, Inc. agrees to loan monies to Service Team Inc. from time to time on an open account basis.  The money advances will be at no interest and may be repaid from time to time as funds from the company are available.









 









	 	 
Hallmark Venture Group, Inc.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Robert L. Cashman	 
	 	 	Robert L. Cashman, President	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 










 




	 	 
 
Service Team Inc.



	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Carlos Arreola	 
	 	 	Carlos Arreola, President
#### Adeline Colla-Negri, Plaintiff, *v.*Ottorino Colla-Negri, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

September 25, 1959.

*497
      *Stull & Stull (Richard Stull*of counsel), for plaintiff.

*Guido Coen*for defendant.

Charles A. Loreto, J.

Motion to confirm a Referee’s report is denied.

The court construes paragraph “Fifth” of the separation agreement dated April 12,1956, as violative of section 51 of the Domestic Relations Law. An agreement which arbitrarily permits the husband to determine the measure of support which he shall provide for his wife is void. In *Tirrell*v. *Tirrell*(232 N. Y. 224, 229) it was said: “ The manner in which the wife is to be supported by the husband in a discharge of the obligation imposed upon him is not dependent upon any whim or caprice on his part, neither is he permitted to arbitrarily determine the measure of support which he shall provide for his wife. To clothe a husband with such discretion might easily result in a wife becoming a public charge, while a husband might continue to live in luxury. The law is not only more stringent but more merciful and requires that the measure of support shall be commensurate with the manner in which the parties have lived and a consideration of the ability of the husband to furnish means of support.” (See, also, *Haas*v. *Haas,*298 N. Y. 69; *Kyff*v. *Kyff,*286 N. Y. 71, 74; *Rubinfeld*v. *Rubinfeld,*264 App. Div. 888; *Leeds*v. *Leeds,*265 App. Div. 189; *Kramer*v. *Kramer,*248 App. Div. 781.)

The excision of paragraph “ Fifth ” does not vitiate the entire agreement since other provisions of the agreement which provide for support of the plaintiff are valid and enforcible. They are separable and divisible from the condemned provisions and do not relieve the defendant of or diminish his obligations to provide continuing support to the plaintiff (see *Leeds*v. *Leeds,*284 App. Div. 869, affd. 308 N. Y. 991; *Rubinfeld*v. *Rubinfeld,*264 App. Div. 888, supra; *Schiff*v. *Schiff,*270 App. Div. 845; *Matter of Brenner,*44 N. Y. S. 2d 447, affd. 268 App. Div. 1001; *Hoops*v. *Hoops,*266 App. Div. 512; 6 Williston, Contracts [Rev. ed.], § 1779).

It appears from the record that the Referee suspended the hearing to enable him to determine the validity of the agreement and that he would continue the hearing to a conclusion should he hold the agreement valid. The matter is remitted to him to take proof on the other referred matters and to submit a further report thereof expeditiously. The determination of the motion in the main will be held in abeyance until the coming in of the Referee’s further report.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**OF MAX RE CAPITAL LTD.**

 

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies thequarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 of Max Re Capital Ltd. (the “Issuer”). 

 

I, Keith S. Hynes, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer certify that: 

 

(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 

 

(ii) the information contained in theForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest. 

 

Dated: October 31, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1

D&E Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 of D&E Communications, Inc. (the Company) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James W. Morozzi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    JAMES W. MOROZZIName:

James W. MorozziTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

March 14, 2007
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
 Quiksilver, Inc.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
    
    001-14229
(Commission File Number)
    
    33-0199426
(IRS Employer Identification Number)15202 Graham Street, Huntington Beach, CA
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    92649
(Zip Code)
 (714) 889-2200
 
    o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain OfficersItem 9.01 Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESINDEX TO EXHIBITSExhibit 10.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 5.02
    
    Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors;
Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers
     
 Item 9.01
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits
  Exhibit No.
    
    Exhibit Title or Description10.1
    
    Form of Restricted Stock Agreement
 2




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  Dated:  October 22, 2007
    Quiksilver, Inc. 
(Registrant)By:
    /s/ Charles S. ExonCharles S. ExonExecutive Vice-President, Business & Legal
Affairs, Secretary and General Counsel 3




---



##### Table of Contents



INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 Exhibit No.
    
    Exhibit Title or Description10.1
    
    Form of Restricted Stock Agreement
 4
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
   ENDOLOGIX, INC.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    000-28440
(Commission File Number)
    
    68-0328265
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)11 Studebaker, Irvine, CA
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    92618
(Zip Code)
  
   o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.SIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXEXHIBIT 99.1EXHIBIT 99.2    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
    
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  Exhibit Number
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release dated July 24, 2008.99.2
    
    Transcript of Conference Call held on July 24, 2008.




---



##### Table of Contents



ENDOLOGIX, INC.July 28, 2008
    /s/ Robert J. KristRobert J. KristChief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit Number
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release dated July 24, 2008.99.2
    
    Transcript of Conference Call held on July 24, 2008.
VIRGINIA:

 In the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court 

Building in the City of Richmond on Friday, the 14th day of 

November, 1997. 

Thomas Franklin Hohman, Appellant, 

 against Record No. 970464 

 Court of Appeals No. 0815-95-4 

Commonwealth of Virginia, Appellee. 

 Upon an appeal from a judgment rendered by the 

Court of Appeals of Virginia on the 31st day of 

December, 1996. 

 Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and argument of 

counsel, the Court is of opinion that there is no error in the 

judgment appealed from. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in 

the memorandum opinion of the Court of Appeals, dated December 31, 

1996, the judgment is affirmed. The appellant shall pay to the 

Commonwealth of Virginia thirty dollars damages. 

 It is ordered that the Circuit Court of Stafford County allow 

counsel for the appellant a fee of $625 for services rendered the 

appellant on this appeal, in addition to counsel's costs and 

necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses. 

 The Commonwealth shall recover of the appellant the amount 

paid court-appointed counsel to represent him in this proceeding, 

counsel's costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses, and 

the fees and costs to be assessed by the clerk of this Court and 

the clerk of the court below. 

 Justice Koontz took no part in the consideration of this 

case. 
________________________ 

JUSTICE KEENAN, with whom JUSTICE LACY joins, dissenting: 

 I would hold that the language of Code § 19.2-237 is 

unambiguous and prohibits a trial court from enforcing a jail 

sentence in a misdemeanor case in which the defendant has failed 

to appear and plead. The manifest purpose of this provision is to 

permit the court to hear and dispose of misdemeanor cases without 

impairing any defendant's liberty interests. 

 If the trial court wishes to retain the discretion to impose 

a jail sentence on an absent defendant charged with a misdemeanor, 

the court may issue a capias for the defendant's arrest and have 

him brought before the court to enter a plea to the charge and be 

tried. In the present case, the trial court erred because it 

imposed a jail sentence on the defendant when he had not appeared 

for trial, had not entered a plea to the charge, and had not 

waived his right to trial by jury. The imposition of this 

sentence violated the clear statutory mandate that when a court 

tries an absent defendant charged with a misdemeanor "in the same 

manner as if [the defendant] had appeared, plead not guilty and 

waived trial by jury, . . . the court shall not in any such case 

enforce a jail sentence." Code 

§ 19.2-237. Therefore, I would reverse the trial court's judgment 

and remand the case for imposition of a sentence that conforms 

with this statutory restriction. 

 This order shall be certified to the Court of Appeals of 

Virginia and to the Circuit Court of Stafford County and shall be 
published in the Virginia Reports. 

 A Copy, 

 Teste: 

 David B. Beach, Clerk 

Costs due the Commonwealth 

 by appellant in Supreme 

 Court of Virginia: 

 Attorneys' fees: $925.00 plus their costs and expenses 

Teste: 

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000910468
<NAME> THE MAXIM GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                          89,901
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,974
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,384
<INVENTORY>                                     58,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               220,347
<PP&E>                                          83,504
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 388,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          225,912
<BONDS>                                        116,343
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                     160,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   388,768
<SALES>                                        664,426
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               664,426
<CGS>                                          457,339
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  220,748
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,023)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,801
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,831)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,656)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,175)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    377
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,552)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.10)<F1><F2>
<FN>
<F1>Includes non-recurring charges of $23,713
<F2>Includes gain on sale of Image of $24,863
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Trimol Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.





/s/ Jack BravermanJack BravermanChief Financial OfficerTRIMOL GROUP, INC.





April 3, 2011





[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Trimol Group Inc. and will be retained by Trimol Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]