alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
4.   Continued Validity of the Employment Agreement. Except as amended and supersededby this Amendment, the Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect, will continue tobind the parties hereto, and will continue to govern the terms and conditions of the Executive’scontinued employment with the Company. To the extent that the terms of this Amendment conflict orare inconsistent with the terms of the Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment willgovern.     5.   Entire Agreement. This Amendment and the Employment Agreement, to the extent notamended and superseded by this Amendment, constitute the entire agreement between the partieshereto respecting the employment of the Executive with the Company (the “Entire Agreement”). Therebeing no representations, warranties, or commitments between the parties hereto except as set forthin the Entire Agreement, the Entire Agreement replaces and supersedes any other employmentagreement or arrangement, oral or written, between the Executive and the Company or any of itsAffiliates or predecessors.     6.   Amendment Effective Date. This Amendment will become binding once both partieshereto have executed this Amendment. Once executed, this Amendment will be effective as of theAmendment Effective Date.     7.   Governing Law. This Amendment, the rights and obligations of the parties hereto,and any claims or disputes relating thereto, will be governed by and construed in accordance withthe laws of the State of California (but not including the choice of law rules thereof).     8.   Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each ofwhich shall be deemed to be an original, and all such counterparts when taken together shallconstitute one and the same original.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Amendment, or have caused thisAmendment to be duly executed on their behalf, as of the day and year first written above.      CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC.
### SERVED : JANUAR Y 24,201 2 •..: f V^Mt^J T O f ••..'•oKr i OiiTRAnOiN';

-

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , DC I N TH E MATTERO F SK Y KING , INC . F A A DOCKE T No . CP11SOOOO O (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) FDMSNo . FAA-20M-067 0 

### ORDE RT O RESPONDEN T T O SHO W CAUS E Th e Federal Aviatio n Administratio n ("Complainant" ) o n January 18 , 2012 , filed aMotio n to Compe l ("Motion") . Th e Motio n aver s tha t Complainant' s "Firs t

Request s fo r Discovery " o f

Novembe r

1 , 2011 , response s to whic h were du e o n or abou t December 1 , 2011 , has , eve n afte

r Complainant' s extensio n o f it s deadlin e to Januar

y 5 , 2012 , ye

t to generat e an

y response . WHEREFORE , i

t i s ORDERE D a s follows : 1 . O n o r before Februar

y 10 , 2012 , Responden t

shal l file arespons e to thi s Order statin g wh

y the relie f

requeste di

n Complainant' s Motio n shoul dnot b e granted ; 2 . On o r

before Februar

y 10 , 2012 , Responden t

shal l full y andcompletel y answe r each o f Cotnplainant' s discovery requests ; and 3 . Absent

ful l an dcomplet e response s to Orderin g paragraph s lan d2 , Responden t

ma y b e sanctione dincluding , but no t limite dto , allegation s i

n the Complain t

ma y b e deeme dadmitted ; Responden t ma y b e preclude dfro mintroducin g any evidenc e a t th e hearin g othe r

tha n hi s own testimony ; hi s Reques t

fo r Hearin g may b e dismissed ; and/o r aDefault Judgmen t ma y b e entere dagains t

Responden t

i n th e ful l amount o f th e fine requeste db y the Complainan t i n it s Complaint .

U.S . Administraljv c La

w Judg e Attachmen t

^ Servic e Lis tFDM S No . EAA-20II-067 0 (Civi l Penall y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2WIOO0 '

ON E COP Y Stephe n A . Badger , V P Fligh t Operation s an dDirecto r o f Safet y an dSecurit y Sk y King , Inc . 360 0 Powe r

In n Road , Suit e H Sacramento , C A 9582 6 TEL : 916-454-240 0 FAX : 916-737-896 0 Geral dA . Ellis , Complainam' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Souther n Region , ASO- 7 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 2063 6 Atlanta , G A 3032 0 TEL : 404-305-520 0 FAX ; 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Adminislraliv e Lo w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Dcpartmei U o f

Tratispoiiauo n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6 Fa x

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier , ii.s

e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Adrninislralion . 80

0 Independence Avenue . S.W.' . Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2WI00U . Washington . D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk . AGC-430 .
ex10-1.htm









EXHIBIT 10.1


 







4 Tri Harbor Court


Port Washington, NY 11050


Tel: (516) 627 6000


Fax: (516) 627 6093


 



	

www.aceto.com

	Albert L. Eilender
	 	Chairman & Chief Executive Officer





 




 



	
January 10, 2012


	  
	  
	
By Hand Delivery


	
Mr. Douglas A. Roth


	
c/o Aceto Corporation


	
4 Tri Harbor Court


	
Port Washington, NY 11050


	  
	
Dear Mr. Roth,







 


Pursuant to Section 1 of the employment agreement between you and Aceto Corporation (“Aceto”), dated as of March 24, 2009 (the “Employment Agreement”), this letter shall serve as notice under the Employment Agreement that the Employment Period (as defined in the Employment Agreement) will not be extended.  This notice is effective as of the date hereof and, unless terminated sooner, the Employment Period will expire at midnight on March 23, 2012.







The Employment Agreement will continue to govern your employment with Aceto until the end of the Employment Period. You are not entitled to any payments or benefits under the Employment Agreement solely as a result of Aceto’s delivery of this notice.  Nothing in the foregoing paragraph shall be construed as affecting (i) any other right you or Aceto may have under any other provision of the Employment Agreement, including, without limitation, your or Aceto’s ability to terminate the Employment Agreement and your employment thereunder, or (ii) your obligations under Section 6 (“Confidential Information”) and Section 7 (“Non-Compete; Non-Solicitation”) of the Employment Agreement, which will survive the expiration of the Employment Period and remain in full force and effect.







Enclosed is a copy of the Aceto Corporation Severance Policy (the “Severance Policy”).  The Severance Policy will succeed the Employment Agreement and, if then in effect, will generally apply in the event of your termination of employment with Aceto following the expiration of the Employment Agreement.  In addition, the Company in the near future intends to enter into a new severance agreement with you that will provide you with enhanced severance protections following a change in control of the Company that are similar to the change in control protections currently provided under Section 5 of the Employment Agreement.  You will receive additional information about this new severance agreement in the coming weeks.


 

 



	
ACETO CORPORATION

	 
	
 

	 
	  	 
	
/s/ Albert L. Eilender

	 
	
By: Albert L. Eilender

	 
	
Title: Chairman & CEO

	 
	  	 
	
Enclosures
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5111 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5111

 To amend title 40, United States Code, to provide certain purchasing 
authority for recipients or subrecipients of grants under chapter 53 of 
             title 49 of such Code, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2018

 Mr. Cartwright (for himself and Mr. Russell) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 40, United States Code, to provide certain purchasing 
authority for recipients or subrecipients of grants under chapter 53 of 
             title 49 of such Code, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transit Bus Procurement Act''.

SEC. 2. PURCHASING AUTHORITY.

    Section 502 of title 40, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(f) Use of Supply Schedules for the Purchase of Buses.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Administrator shall provide access 
        to sources of supply for buses to recipients or subrecipients 
        of Federal assistance under chapter 53 of title 49, United 
        States Code, to obtain buses for use in public transportation.
            ``(2) Department of transportation.--The Secretary of 
        Transportation shall restrict access to sources of supply of 
        the General Services Administration to obtain buses to 
        recipients or subrecipients described in paragraph (1) in areas 
        with a population of less than 200,000 and to recipients or 
        subrecipients in areas with a population of 200,000 or more 
        with 100 or fewer buses in fixed route service during peak 
        service hours.''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.
 Dated: August 10, 2007
    By:
    /s/ ANDRE M. HILLIOUAndre M. HilliouChief Executive Officer CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.
 Dated: August 10, 2007
    By:
    /s/   MARK MILLERMark MillerChief Financial Officer
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 95

_____________________________
D IANA C OSTARAKIS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Marianne L. Aho , Judge

. April 24, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J.
, and R OBERTS and O STERHAUS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 W. Charles Fletcher of Law Office of W. Charles Fletcher, Jacksonville
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for A ppellee.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): March 25, 2008
 
 PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
  California
(State or Other Jurisdiction 
of Incorporation)
    
    0-21296
(Commission File Number)
    
    95-3759463
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
  3450 East Miraloma Avenue 
Anaheim, CA
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    92806-2101
(Zip Code)
 (714) 414-4000
Registrants telephone number, including area code
 
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01
    
    Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
  DiscretionaryNamed Executive Officer
    
    Title
    

Bonus AmountThomas M. Kennedy
    
    Division President, PacSun
    
    $
    68,200Michael L. Henry
    
    Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
and Secretary
    
    $
    18,000
  -2-




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Dated: March 31, 2008
    Pacific Sunwear of California,
Inc./s/ MICHAEL L. HENRYMichael L. HenrySenior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary -3-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN LEON WILLIAMS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 111 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of September, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal and Application for Exceptional Jurisdiction and Extraordinary Relief are

DENIED

.
### SAT Report PMN Number: S-11-0010 SAT Date: 6/24/2011 Print Date: 10/3/2011
Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 1

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 3 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: Yes Ecotox: Routes of exposure : Health: Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: LUNG OVERLOAD; ONCO Summary of Assessment : Fate : Fate Summary: S-11-0010 FATE: S < 0.001 mg/L at 25 C (E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong PBT Potential: P3B1*CEB FATE:
Health : Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes ( p che m ). Concern for lung toxicity if inhaled based on lung overload for poorly soluble particulates and based on submitted test data; and oncogenicity as a material. Test Data: (-) Salmonella with and without activation; (-) E. coli with and without activation; rat oral LD50 >16 g/kg; rabbit dermal LD50 >16 g/kg; rat inhalation LC0 = 5.19 mg/L; no skin irritation in rabbits; mild to moderate eye irritation in rabbits; no skin sensitization in guinea pigs using the Magnusson-Kligman assay; rat 90-day inhalation LOEC = 0.45 mg/m3, lung toxicity; rat 90-day inhalation LOEC = 0.74 mg/m3, lung toxicity
Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments
fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value * daphnid

_ chronic value * algal

_ chronic value * Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value

_ Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on insoluble complexes; SAR chemical class = ; MW100,000; p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) * N ES
SARs
SAR Class Ecotox Factors Comments: SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 3 , 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00144

- CR

AURELIO COLIN VERA , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 412th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 50798

- 1

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This appeal is from a judgment signed January 10, 2014 . The appeal was assigned to the First Court of Appeals; however, the Harris County District Clerk subsequently, and erroneously, assigned this cause to this court. By letter dated Ma rch 19 , 20 14 , the Harris County District Clerk advised this court of its error. Because this cause was erroneously assigned to this court, the appeal in this court is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices McCally , Busby and Donovan.
Do Not Publish

— T ex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No
. FAA- Directorate Identifier: - AD



### f

l y o u makl? c hanges 

### to the ' ' alues in the table below. 

### you IIIIlS! 

### ens ure the total s upd a re a ccor d i

ngl y. 

### f/' the y do not, click (or 

### Tah) into 

### aud then out <)[th e 

### changed cell. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e
. g., aircraft, engine, (e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work

-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement ) (include cost (labor+ 

# u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include on- access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered condition costs here and close

-up) our) Products Inspection (up to) 0.5 ' •II I : ;0 510 l! l!l' .. llli (I , ' 1) ·' 

## ·'·'' l_,,ll!f 0 •ll () I •It ! I \I'I ll Ill) ('I)• (1 IHI ·1110 ('lit) II t'H I .I (; (Jt 'I {J llJ t) lj I t)il ;t (.;II) t HI! 'I

HI 

### ' u ()lt II 1\i • iJO 1, \s{l (1 d) I I ;IIIH I) ') fr! H) 

## oon ,I I 

# " ti i ill () !l!J ll J 11 (i i l I Oil (J If)



# . d lit ' ! 'l) .) lll I) IJI J l) 11.1 !l.ih " diJ (, I{J ' Ill• (JI (; {) tl I) (>U {) \J{; \1.•." l The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for 

### U.S

. fleet: $21,675 Cos ts covered under warranty 

## (if known) $0
O n-Condition Costs:

# ~ Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour)

replacement) testing, and closeup) R e-Identify (up to) 1.0 '• X. tltl $1 ,..;('I Remove and 9.0 

# " $ 19 ,700 Replace (up t o) "- till 

## -
( I
I' < [II 

### Special considerations for Economic Analys is (Use thisfield to explain anything in the Estim ated Cos ts table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

# ~ YES* 

# D NO 

### [gl *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? : - YES* 

# D NO 

# IZI *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No

# answer.**'** YES 

# D NO 

### [gl Explanation: 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

- YES* 

# D NO 

### [gl *Explanation:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1457 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1457

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
     coastwise trade for the vessel SHOGUN, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 1995

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
     coastwise trade for the vessel SHOGUN, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VESSEL DOCUMENTATION.

    Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, 
chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App. 289), and sections 12106 through 12108 of 
title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue 
a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel SHOGUN, United States 
official number 577839.
                                 <all>
```
# 2016 - Appalachian Regional Commission

- High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties.The post High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties. The post College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties.The post Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average.The post Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Per Capita Income Rates in Appalachia, 2016 This map shows the per capita income rate in each of the ARC counties. The post Per Capita Income Rates in Appalachia, 2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative Per Capita Income Rates in Appalachia, 2016 This map shows the per capita income rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative Per Capita Income Rates in Appalachia, 2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Per Capita Market Income Rates in Appalachia, 2016 This map shows the per capita market income rate in each of the ARC counties. The post Per Capita Market Income Rates in Appalachia, 2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative Per Capita Market Income Rates in Appalachia, 2016 This map shows the per capita market income rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative Per Capita Market Income Rates in Appalachia, 2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.