alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23

- 0128 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KURTTIS WARREN COPYAK,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER**
Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellant is given an extension of time until September 3, 2024, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 5 2024

08/05/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0128
## A D9- /& 06/7$ d Aartfl)J>/&/>£ 't$~~oo%y $7%?gri}t RECEIVED JUL - 6 2015


# ££/?/£?/&££ 0Pj0fiA&i&/cydil/tfp a£,//c/, #&j&n/h/jgj *&&***&/* &>/S, COURTOFCRWAUPPEALS JUL I0 2i;i5 Abel Acosta, Clerk CAROL ANNE HARLEY CLERK OF THE COURT NINTH COURT OF APPEALS

COURTHFOBIMINAI APPEALS JUL 09 2015
#### Burgess, Executor, *v.*Cleary et al., Appellants.

*567Argued September 27, 1943.

Before Keller, P. J., Baldrige, Rhodes, Hirt, Kenworthey and Reno, JJ. (Stadtfeld, J. absent).

*Herman Toll,*for appellants.

*John F. Burgess,*for appellee.

November 10, 1943 :

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This appeal is from a judgment entered by the learned court helow against the defendants on the pleadings in an ejectment case.

John P. Boyle died testate December 3, 1940. He named in his will John P. Burgess as executor and trustee, and title to him passed thereunder to the premises in dispute known as No. 4136 Manayunk Avenue, Philadelphia. Defendants in their answer averred that they obtained possession of these premises in October 1933 from Boyle under a verbal lease providing for a rental of $50.00 per month, and that they would receive a credit for lodging and boarding Boyle, leaving a net cash balance due monthly of $15.34, and that this rental arrangement continued until Boyle’s death.

Defendants averred also that the premises are not now being used entirely by them, a portion being vacant, that the part they occupy has a rental value of *568$15.00 per month and that they offered to pay plaintiff that amount which has been declined. Of course the defendants were not entitled to a credit for Boyle’s lodging and boarding after his death. It is not alleged that they entered into a new lease, so that the only lease that remains in effect is the original one providing for payment of $50.00 per month which defendants do not contend has been paid. The defense that the lessees offered payment of the rent cannot prevail.

The second defense is that the plaintiff failed to comply with O.P.A. Regulations.

The defendants as tenants recognize that the legal title to the premises is in plaintiff, but claim the right of possession under the original lease until they can secure living quarters relying upon Maximum Rent Regulation No. 28, relating to restrictions of removal of tenants, as provided by part 1388.1806, 1942 Federal Register pages 4913, 4915; that plaintiff as required thereby should have notified the O.P.A. Office of the Philadelphia area of his instituting this action.

The regulations referred to provide in part that “So long as the tenant continues to pay rent to which the landlord is entitled, no tenant shall be removed from any housing accommodations by action to evict, or to recover possession by exclusion from possession or otherwise.”

It is apparent that the facts averred by defendants do not bring this case within the O.P.A. Regulations as the defendants failed to pay the rent in accordance with the lease so that notice was not required to the Federal Agency. 

The appellants argue also that the Plaintiff’s Declara*569tion was insufficient to support the judgment. We find no merit in that contention. The pleadings in this ejectment case warranted the entering of judgment for the plaintiffs and the court below acted within its authority in doing so. *Jennings v. Maley,*261 Pa. 485, 104 A. 731.

Judgment affirmed.
#### A. N. CAMPBELL et al. v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 9151.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 2, 1939.

Robertson, Castle & Anthony, of Honolulu, T. H., for appellants.

I. M. Stainback, U. S. Atty., and J. Frank McLaughlin, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Honolulu, T. H., and Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty. Gen.

Before GARRECHT and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered judgment of District Court herein reversed on authority of Blatt v. United States, 305 U.S. 267, 59 S.Ct. 186, 83 L.Ed. 167, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court in this cause issued forthwith.
Exhibit 32.3

Certification of Chief Accounting Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007(the Report) of MCG Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John C. Wellons, the Chief Accounting Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    JOHN C. WELLONSName: John C. WellonsDate: July 31, 2007
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. BLUFF CITY LIME AND CEMENT COMPANY.

No. 430 Orig.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

April 7, 1939.

Robert B. Watts, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Green, Verlie & Hoagland, of Alton, Ill., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent ordered to cease and desist from doing certain things and to take certain affirmative action, on petition for enforcement of order of Labor Board.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7731** 

ANTONIO MARTINELLE RANDOLPH , Plaintiff

- Appell ant ,

v. L. FUERTES ROSARIO, HS A

- MLP; JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden; G. LINK, Physicians Assistant , Defendant s - Appell ee s .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort
. Richard M

. Gergel , District Judge. ( 9:09

- cv - 03166

- RMG )

Submitted : April 28, 2011 Decided: May 3, 2011

Before DAVI S , KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit J udges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Antonio Martinelle Randolph , Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in t his circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antonio Martinelle Randolph appeals the district
court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and d ismissing without prejudice Randolph’s 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (200 6 ) complaint for failure to exhaust administrati ve remedies . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Randolph v. R o sario , No. 9:09

- cv - 03166

- RMG (D.S.C. Dec. 1, 2010) . We deny Randolph’s motion for stay and dispens e with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

ELIZABETH COLTON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) Civil Case No. 09-1772 (RJL) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

FINAL JUDGMENT 

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 

~ ~ day of September, 2010, hereby 

ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for 

Summary Judgment [#l3] is GRANTED; and it is further 

ORDERED that plaintiffs Rule 56(f) Motion for Discovery [#19] is DENIED AS 

MOOT; and it is further 

ORDERED that the above-captioned case be DISMISSED with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED. 

United States District Judge 

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
                           EXHIBIT 27
                                
                    FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
            (in thousands except per share amounts)
       
<S>                                                    <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
   <PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1997
   <CASH>                                                    $1,361
   <SECURITIES>                                                   0
   <RECEIVABLES>                                                  0
   <ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
   <INVENTORY>                                                    0
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           2,416
   <PP&E>                                                   432,071
   <DEPRECIATION>                                             8,985
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           433,903
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     15,839
   <BONDS>                                                   68,539
   <COMMON>                                                     452
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
   <PREFERRED>                                                    0
   <OTHER-SE>                                               345,974
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             433,903
   <SALES>                                                        0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          46,666
   <CGS>                                                          0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          18,882
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         7,918
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                                           31,291
   <INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       31,291
   <DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
   <CHANGES>                                                      0
   <NET-INCOME>                                              31,291
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                               2.21
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                               1.94
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6233]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. ELLISON:
       H.R. 6460.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 4
```
#### Kenny *v.*Fuld, Appellant, et al. Hope *v.*Fuld, Appellant.

Argued September 29, 1943.

Before Keller, P. J., Baldrige, Stadteeld, Rhodes, Hirt and Kenworthey, JJ. (Reno, J., absent).

*Michael A. Foley,*for appellant.

*Maurice Freedman,*with him *James F. Masterson*and *G. Fred DiBona,*for appellees.

*422October 29, 1943:

Per Curiam,

These appeals result from a head-on collision between two automobiles. The plaintiff, Hope, was driving his car eastwardly on Cheltenham Avenue, Philadelphia, about one o’clock in the morning, and claimed that he was struck head-on by the defendant’s car, driven by him, and coming rapidly from the east on the wrong side of the street. The plaintiff, Kenny, was a guest or passenger in Hope’s car, and the latter was brought in as an additional defendant in Kenny’s action. The collision took place between street intersections. The testimony raised questions of fact as to the negligence of the defendant and the contributory negligence of the plaintiff, Hope, which were for the jury to decide. They decided them in favor of the respective plaintiffs, and against the defendant, who appealed from the judgments entered on the verdicts.

The matters chiefly relied on by appellant’s counsel in his oral argument in this court were not included among the reasons for a new trial filed in the court below, although they were peculiarly within the discretion of that court, nor were they specified in the assignments of error filed in this court.

The evidence in the record does not warrant a reversal of the findings of the jury.

The judgments are severally affirmed.
Exhibit 4.1
Form of Common Stock Certificate


              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
                              CHINA AUTOPARTS, INC.
                      AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE 26,060,607 SHARES

20,000,000 COMMON SHARES            6,060,607 SERIES A PREFERRED SHARES
PAR VALUE $.0001 EACH               PAR VALUE $.0001 EACH


This certifies that  ________________ is the owner of _______________ fully paid
and  non-assessable  shares  of the  Common  Shares  of  CHINA  AUTOPARTS,  INC.
transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by duly  authorized  Attorney  upon  surrender of this  Certificate  properly
endorsed.

In Witness  Whereof,  the said  Corporation  has caused this  Certificate  to be
signed by its duly  authorized  officers  and to be sealed  with the Seal of the
Corporation

                                  this _________ day of _________ A.D.______

Secretary - Treasure                                    President
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blast Energy Services, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John MacDonald,
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May
11, 2009





By:
            /s/
      John MacDonaldJohn
      MacDonaldChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Accounting Officer)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00540

- CV

Levi and Michelle MCKENZIE

, Appellants

v.

COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK

, Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 05

- 21843

- CV

The Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee, Community National Bank, recover its costs of this appeal from appellants, Levi and Michelle McKenzie.

SIGNED June 10, 2015.

_____________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)


Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of the
undersigned  officers of Wien Group, Inc., a New York corporation (the Company),
do hereby  certify with respect to the  Quarterly  Report of the Company on Form
10-QSB for the quarter  ended March 31,  2005,  as filed with the  Securities  &
Exchange Commission (the 10-QSB Report) that:

(1)      the 10-QSB  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of sections
         13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,

(2)      the information  contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: May 12, 2005                       /s/ Stephen S. Wien
                                          -----------------------------
                                          STEPHEN S. WIEN
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          & Chief Financial Officer
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5148 

To release certain wilderness study areas in the State of Montana. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2018 

Mr. GIANFORTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To release certain wilderness study areas in the State of 

Montana. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Public Use 

5 of Public Lands Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RELEASE OF CERTAIN WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS 

7 IN THE STATE OF MONTANA. 

8 (a) FINDING.—Congress finds that, for the purposes 

9 of section 3(a) of the Montana Wilderness Study Act of 

10 1977 (Public Law 95–150; 91 Stat. 1244), the land in 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5148 IH

1 the State of Montana described in subsection (c) has been 

2 adequately studied for wilderness designation. 

3 (b) RELEASE.—The land described in subsection (c) 

4 is no longer subject to section 3(a) of the Montana Wilder5 ness Study Act of 1977 (Public Law 95–150; 91 Stat. 

6 1244). 

7 (c) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in 

8 subsections (a) and (b) is— 

9 (1) the approximately 151,000 acres of land 

10 comprising the West Pioneer Wilderness Study Area; 

11 (2) the approximately 32,500 acres of land 

12 within the Blue Joint Wilderness Study Area not 

13 recommended for wilderness classification in the 

14 record of decision prepared by the Forest Service en15 titled ‘‘Bitterroot National Forest Plan’’ and dated 

16 September 1987; 

17 (3) the approximately 94,000 acres of land 

18 comprising the Sapphire Wilderness Study Area; 

19 (4) the approximately 81,000 acres of land 

20 comprising the Middle Fork Judith Wilderness 

21 Study Area; and 

22 (5) the approximately 91,000 acres of land 

23 comprising the Big Snowies Wilderness Study Area. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

### nomwahleY. 2. sexton, say 1, xmih Page2

l Each officer nsmtl in thLs Chapter shall first 0uC of the current fees of his offic0 pay 

### or be psi.&the amount alloved him mdcr tic provisions of Article 3883, together with the salaries of his assistants and deputies, and authorlefxlexpenses under Article 38;5D,and the amount neoes55x-y to cover costs af praim on cfhtever fiurety bond ploybe roquire& by lar;. Lf the current feco cf such office colleoted in 

### any year tc more than the mount needed to pay the mounts above qcclfieG, same shall bc &XIIIed cxccssfeos, arat&allbcdiapo~ed~f in the manner 

### aerfahafter proribed.

*At the ololme of each Ronth of h5s telmre 

### ot 0mOO eachOfflOOr-05 here&n who ie cam

### peacratedoa a foe baelo shall makeas part of the report ROTreq@red by llu, ou lfaniaed pad molp st8tdaoat 

### of all the sotusl an&neoesecy oxpeREecIRourred by him 5ll the oon&lot of ILIE omae, srtobas 8fationery, sttmp~ felephon* praniraps on 0mOi8w bOnas#tnaladiog the 

## cost of suretyhondsforhisDeputlstz, pmaius~onriTe, **bar&%x-y,** 

### theft, robbe~insursnceprotootl.mgpubl&a fun&, trawling expenses sod Other aeeeossrg eqemsea * l 

### l

EfeThe smountof such espeneee,together vith the xmtouat of salaries psid to Aseisfante, Deputies and 

### Clerks shall he pa&dout of the fees efuaed 

### by such 0ffiaer.a
The Statutes are silent as to the rate per mile to 

### be allowed the County 

### Attorney ta bc deducted frmi the 8x0868 fees 

### ot orrice, cmroute to ;inafrom the Justioe Preaincte nit&In the aounty In the oo@uc.f 

### ofhlsoffzloe though the statWe Qee stipulate that he is cntifzod to Ed 1 aotudl snd neeosemyHomrableL Pa Sexton, May b ISm, Page3

expenses 2x1the con&et of his office. Therefore, it 5s our opinion that Ileis entitled t.41 actual expenses Inourm?ilby bin In the necessary wnduct of his office,and should be relmburscd for traveling expenses, if such frmd is available frou his excess 

### fees of off&e. 

## ver?r trulyyours ATlWUlM GEtiElUU01~TEXAS
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 (the “Report”) of MCG Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Beverly Ja ne Alley, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:


|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/ BEVERLY JANE ALLEYName:Beverly Jane AlleyTitle:Interim Chief Financial OfficerDateApril 28, 2014
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       Consent of Independent Accountants



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
33-83688 on Form S-3 and in  Registration  Statement No. 33-13601 on Form S-8 of
Century Casinos,  Inc. of our report dated February 28, 1997,  appearing in this
Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB  of  Century  Casinos,  Inc.  for the year  ended
December 31, 1996.





DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Denver, Colorado
February 28, 1997