alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                           ARM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
                            515 WEST MARKET STREET
                          LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY 40202

                                                              March 20, 1998

Mr. Martin H. Ruby
ARM Financial Group, Inc.
515 West Market Street
Louisville, Kentucky 40202

Dear Marty:

     This letter amendment (this "AMENDMENT") sets forth our mutual
understanding concerning an amendment to your Employment Agreement with
ARM Financial Group, Inc. (the "COMPANY") dated as of July 1, 1996, as
amended December 4, 1997 (the "EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT").

          1.  Section 5.1.1 is hereby amended by deleting the words "the
     penultimate sentence of this Section 5.1.1 and" in the first line of
     Section 5.1.1.

          2.  Section 5.1.1 is hereby further amended by deleting the
     penultimate sentence in such Section 5.1.1.

          3.  This Amendment shall be governed in accordance with the laws of
     the State of New York.

          4.  Except as modified hereby, the Employment Agreement remains in
     full force and effect.



<PAGE>

                                      2

     Please evidence your agreement with this Amendment by executing the
acknowledgment set forth below.

                                                  ARM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

                                                  /s/ Colin F. Raymond
                                                  --------------------
                                                  Name:
                                                  Title:

ACKNOWLEDGED AND
AGREED AS OF THE DATE
FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN

 /s/ Martin H. Ruby
---------------------
     Martin H. Ruby
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 12

                 SHEFFIELD STEEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                         (In thousands, except ratios)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                        Years Ended April 30,
                                                 --------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   2001             2000          1999          1998           1997
                                                 --------         -------        -------       -------        -------
<S>                                              <C>              <C>            <C>           <C>            <C>
Fixed charges, as defined:
    Interest on long-term debt                   $ 16,919         $15,167        $14,599       $12,300        $11,769
    Amortization of debt issue costs                  500             485            456           383            368
                                                 --------         -------        -------       -------        -------

          Total fixed charges                    $ 17,419         $15,652        $15,055       $12,683        $12,137
                                                 ========         =======        =======       =======        =======

Earnings, as defined:
    Income (loss) before income taxes
      and extraordinary item                     $(17,406)        $   193        $ 1,496       $ 1,302        $(3,509)

    Fixed charges (as shown above)                 17,419          15,652         15,055        12,683         12,137
                                                 --------         -------        -------       -------        -------

          Earnings available for fixed           $     13         $15,845        $16,551       $13,985        $ 8,628
           charges                               ========         =======        =======       =======        =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges[a]                   -           1.01x          1.10x         1.10x              -
                                                 ========         =======        =======       =======        =======
</TABLE>

[a] Ratio of earnings to fixed charges is defined as income before income taxes
    and extraordinary item plus amortization of debt issuance cost and interest
    expense divided by the sum of interest expense plus amortization of debt
    issuance costs. Earnings of approximately ($17,406) in fiscal 2001 and
    ($3,509) in fiscal 1997 were insufficient to cover fixed charges.

                                      52
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CARLOS MARIE PALAFOX-REYES, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 09-70924 Agency No. A070-735-665
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted February 13, 2012 Pasadena, California Before: PREGERSON, HAWKINS, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Carlos Marie Palafox-Reyes (“ Palafox”), a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Bo ard of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration J udge’s order of removal. We have 

# FILED
MAR 16 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS1 Because Palafox is removable as an alien convicted of an aggravated felony “crime of violence” under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F), we decline to address the alternative grounds for removal relied upon by the BIA. 2 jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny Palafox’s petition for review. We address his arguments in turn. 1. The documents submitted by the Department of Homeland Security during Palafox’s removal proceedings esta blished that: (1) Palafox was convicted of first-degree burglary, in violation of California Penal Code § 459, and (2) Palafox received a term of imprisonment of at least one year for his first-degree burglary conviction. Accordingly, the BI A did not err in finding that Palafox was removable as an alien convicted of an aggravated felony “crime of violence” under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F). See Kwong v. Holder , No. 04-72167, --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 6061513, at *5 (9th Cir. Dec. 7, 2011); Lopez-Cardona v. Holder , 662 F.3d 1110, 1112 (9th Cir. 2011). 1 2. Palafox argues that the term “alien” in the Immigration and Nationality Act does not apply to him because he consid ers himself to be a “national” of the United States. Palafox’s argument is foreclosed by our precedents. See Theagene v. Gonzales , 411 F.3d 1107, 1112 (9th Cir. 2005); Reyes-Alcaraz v. Ashcroft , 363 F.3d 937 (9th Cir. 2004). PETITION DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MAX CAPITAL GROUP LTD.

This certification is
provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 of Max Capital Group Ltd.
(the Issuer).

I, W. Marston Becker, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer, certify that:

(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Issuer.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: November 4, 2008



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       |  | /s/ W. Marston Becker  
|Name:  |  | W. Marston Becker      
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer



41
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 13, 2021

NO. 03-16-00041-CV

John J. Gorman IV, Appellant

v.

Westech Capital Corp., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND KELLY

DISMISSED ON JOINT MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on January 7, 2016. The

parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the 

Court agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and 

dismisses the appeal. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and 

in the court below.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1443

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 102 South

McLean, Lincoln, Illinois, as the ‘‘Edward Madigan Post Office Building’’, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 4, 1995

Mr. SIMON (for himself and Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Government

Affairs

A BILL

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 102 South McLean, Lincoln, Illinois, as the ‘‘Edward

Madigan Post Office Building’’, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF EDWARD MADIGAN POST OF4 FICE BUILDING.

5 The United States Post Office building located at 102

6 South McLean, Lincoln, Illinois, shall be known and des7 ignated as the ‘‘Edward Madigan Post Office Building’’.
2

•S 1443 IS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States Post Office building referred to in section 1 shall

5 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Edward Madigan Post

6 Office Building’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4808 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4808

            To promote transparency in health care pricing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2018

Mr. Perlmutter (for himself and Mr. Gallagher) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To promote transparency in health care pricing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transparent Health Care Pricing Act 
of 2018''.

SEC. 2. TRANSPARENCY IN ALL HEALTH CARE PRICING.

    (a) In General.--Any and all individuals or business entities, 
including hospitals, physicians, nurses, pharmacies, pharmaceutical 
manufacturers, dentists, and any other health care related providers or 
suppliers that offer or furnish health care related items, products, 
services, or procedures (as defined by the Secretary of Health and 
Human Services) for sale to the public shall publicly disclose, on a 
continuous basis, all prices for such items, products, services, or 
procedures in accordance with this section.
    (b) Manner of Disclosure.--The disclosure required under subsection 
(a) shall--
            (1) be made in an open and conspicuous manner;
            (2) be made available at the point of purchase, in print, 
        and on the Internet; and
            (3) include all wholesale, retail, subsidized, discounted, 
        or other such prices the individuals or business entities 
        described in such subsection accept as payment in full for 
        items, products, services, or procedures such individuals or 
        business entities furnish to individual consumers.
    (c) Penalties.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services may 
investigate any and all individuals or business entities that fail to 
comply with the requirements of this section and may impose on such 
individuals or business entities civil fines, or other civil penalties, 
as determined appropriate by the Secretary.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of  Consolidated  Pictures Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John Conroy,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

           1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section  13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           2.  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and   result   of
               operations of the Company.

Dated: November 15, 2004


/s/ John Conroy
------------------------------------
John Conroy, Chief Financial Officer

































                                Exhibit 32.2 - 1
Table of Contents


Exhibit 8.1 SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES The table below sets forth all of our direct and indirect significant subsidiaries and the percentage of equity of each subsidiary we owned directly or indirectly as of December 31, 2009: Jurisdiction of
     
     PercentageName of Company
     
     Incorporation
     
     Owned
     
     DescriptionPropimex, S.A. de C.V.
     
     Mexico
     
     100.00%
     
     Manufacturer of bottles and distributor of bottled beverages.ControladoraInteramericana deBebidas, S.A. de C.V
     
     Mexico
     
     100.00%
     
     Holding company of manufacturers and distributors of beverages.Spal Industria Brasileirade Bebidas, S.A.
     
     Brazil
     
     97.71%
     
     Manufacturer of cans and related products for bottling beverages.Coca-Cola FEMSA deVenezuela S.A.
     
     Venezuela
     
     100.00%
     
     Manufacturer of bottles and related products for bottling beverages.(formerly PanamcoVenezuela, S.A. deC.V.)
  Exh. 8.1-1


---
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18-723V 

Filed: April 3, 2019

UNPUBLISHED

BETHANNE HULL, 

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Tetanus Diphtheria 

acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Justine Elizabeth Walters, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On May 22, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine 

Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of receiving a Tetanus diphtheria acellular pertussis 

(“Tdap”) vaccine on May 22, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special 

Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

 

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This 

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine 

Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the 

disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned 

agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from 

public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in 

accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management 

and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
On April 1, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. 

Specifically, respondent concluded that petitioner’s claim is consistent with a SIRVA as 

defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that petitioner 

has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. Id. at 4.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

 Chief Special Master
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 23-5252 September Term, 2023

1:23-cv-02548-BAH

Filed On: February 16, 2024

Russell Terry,

Appellant

v.

Federal Bureau of Investigation and Bureau

of Consular Affairs,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Katsas, Rao, and Garcia, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s September 12, 2023 order

dismissing appellant’s complaint be affirmed. The district court did not err in concluding

that appellant’s claims were “so attenuated and unsubstantial as to be absolutely

devoid of merit.” Ord v. Dist. of Columbia, 587 F.3d 1136, 1144 (D.C. Cir. 2009)

(quoting Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528, 536 (1974)). And while appellant has not

demonstrated that the district court erred by construing his filing as a complaint and

opening the case, a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction is without prejudice. See Havens v.

Mabus, 759 F.3d 91, 98 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (citing Semtek Int’l Inc. v. Lockheed Martin

Corp., 531 U.S. 497, 505 (2001)).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 23-5252 September Term, 2023

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 27, 2017

No. 04-17-00370-CR

Juan Guzman ZUNIGA JR.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006CR5239

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On May 8, 2017, appellant filed a notice of appeal with the trial court clerk in trial court 

cause No. 2006CR5239. This court assigned appeal number 04-17-00296-CR to the May 8, 

2017 notice of appeal. On May 25, 2017, appellant filed a second notice of appeal with the trial 

court clerk in trial court cause No.2006CR5239. This court inadvertently assigned a second 

appeal number, 04-17-00370-CR, to the May 25, 2017 notice of appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the clerk of this court administratively close appeal 

number 04-17-00296-CR. Appeal number 04-17-00370-CR will be retained on the docket as the 

appeal from trial court cause number 2006CR5239.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of July, 2017.
___________________________________

Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
EXHIBIT 23.1


                                           [Deloitte & Touche logo appears here]


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


     We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements
Nos.  33-3-3040,  333-67581,   333-67581-01,   333-67581-02,   333-67581-03  and
333-67581-04 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements Nos. 33-3-3042,  33-3-3044,
333-27987 and  333-95497 on Form S-8 of  UnionBanCal  Corporation  of our report
dated  January  16,  2002,  appearing  in this  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K of
UnionBanCal Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2001.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


San Francisco, California
March 12, 2002
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 1st Constitution Bancorp (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ ROBERT F. MANGANO              
| Name:  | Robert F. Mangano                |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
| Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:  | May 10, 2007                     |
|        |                                       |  |  |

 

 

/s/ JOSEPH M. REARDON                
| Name:  | Joseph M. Reardon    |
|--------|---------------------------|
| Title: | Senior Vice President and |
|   | Treasurer            |
| Date:  | May 10, 2007         |
|        |                           |  |  |  |

 

 

 

 

 

 

----