alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- 440 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 305 Nebraska Reports

REVEIZ v . EL-KASABY Cite as 305 Neb. 440

Elena Reveiz, appellant, v. Bassel El-Kasaby, appellee. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed April 3, 2020. No. S-19-278. Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: J Russell Derr , Judge. Affirmed. Denise E. Frost, of Johnson & Mock, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant. Cathy S. Trent-Vilim, and, on brief, Stacy L. Morris and Kate Geyer Johnson, of Lamson, Dugan & Murray, L.L.P., for appellee.
Heavican , C.J., Miller

- Lerman , Cassel , Stacy, Funke , and Freudenberg , JJ. Per Curiam

. The February 19, 2019, order of the Douglas County District Court is affirmed by an equally divided court. Affirmed. Papik , J., not participating. Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 04/10/2020 08:07 AM CDT
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Learning, Memory and Decision Neuroscience.                    

*Date:*                         January 17, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Roger Janz, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-8515,                         *janzr2@csr.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 27, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-28953 Filed 1-3-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
----

| Name                                                                            | State                or Country of Incorporation |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                            |                                             |
| Century                Casinos Management, Inc.                                 | Delaware                                         |
| Century                Casinos - Nevada, Inc.                                   | Nevada                                           |
| Century                Casinos Europe GmbH                                      | Austria                                          |
| Century                Casinos Cripple Creek, Inc.                              | Colorado                                         |
| WMCK-Acquisition                Corp.                                           | Delaware                                         |
| WMCK-Venture                Corp.                                               | Delaware                                         |
| Blue                Bells Country Club (Pty) Limited                            | South                Africa                      |
| Blue                Crane Signature Golf Estate (Pty) Limited                   | South                Africa                      |
| Century                Casinos Africa (Pty) Limited                             | South                Africa                      |
| Century                Casinos Caledon (Pty) Limited                            | South                Africa                      |
| Century                Casinos West Rand (Pty) Limited                          | South                Africa                      |
| Celebrations                Accommodation Food Service Management (Pty) Limited | South                Africa                      |
| Rhino                Resort Limited                                             | South                Africa                      |
| Century                Resorts Limited                                          | Mauritius                                        |
| Century                Resorts International Limited                            | Mauritius                                        |
| Century                Resorts Alberta, Inc.                                    | Canada                                           |
| Century                Casinos Tollgate, Inc.                                   | Delaware                                         |
| CC                Tollgate LLC                                                  | Delaware                                         |
| Century                Casinos Iowa, Inc.                                       | Iowa                                             |

----
EXHIBIT 24
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
  Signature
    
    Title
    
    Date/s/ Raouf Y. Halim

Raouf Y. Halim
    
    Director and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
    
    December 10, 2008/s/ Dwight W. Decker

Dwight W. Decker
    
    Chairman
of the Board of Directors
    
    December 12, 2008/s/ Donald H. Gips

Donald H. Gips
    
    Director
    
    December 12, 2008/s/ Michael T. Hayashi

Michael T. Hayashi
    
    Director
    
    December 12, 2008/s/ Ming Louie

Ming Louie
    
    Director
    
    December 12, 2008/s/ Thomas A. Madden

Thomas A. Madden
    
    Director
    
    December 13, 2008/s/ Jerre L. Stead

Jerre L. Stead
    
    Director
    
    December 10, 2008/s/ BRET W. JOHNSEN

Bret W. Johnsen
    
    Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
    
    December 10, 2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6803

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

FREDDY S. CAMPBELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Robert C. Chambers,

District Judge. (2:05-cr-00120-1)

Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: September 17, 2008

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Freddy S. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant

United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Freddy S. Campbell appeals the district court’s order

denying his motions to review the Government’s refusal to move for

a sentence reduction based on substantial assistance and for an

evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Campbell, No. 2:05-cr-00120-1

(S.D.W. Va. Apr. 10, 2008). We deny Campbell’s motion for a

transcript at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Sommer et al. *v.*Blacka, Appellant.

Argued October 1, 1943.

Before Keller, P. J., Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Rhodes, Hirt and Kenworthey, JJ. (Reno, J., absent).

*644*Raymond A. White, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Hyman Zuckerman,*with him *Hirschwald, Goff & Rubin,*for appellees.

December 9, 1948:

Opinion by

Kenworthey, J.,

Defendant in this right-angle collision case appeals from the refusal of his motion for judgment n.o.v. made on the ground plaintiff1 was contributorily negligent as a matter of law.

The intersection of Germantown and Hunting Park Avenues, where this accident occurred, is controlled by a traffic light. Germantown Avenue is 30 feet wide, Hunting Park 60 feet with 20 feet sidewalks. Both are two-way streets.

The evidence and inferences favorable to plaintiff disclose that on November 2, 1940, at 3:30 a.mv he was driving his Dodge Sedan south on the west side of Germantown Avenue. It was raining and the streets were wet. At the house line he noticed the traffic light change from amber to green. When he reached the north curb line of Hunting Park Avenue, proceeding at a rate of 15 miles per hour, he looked to his left [east] and saw nothing for a distance of some 50 to 60 feet. His vision was obstructed beyond that point by an incline or hump in Hunting Park Avenue occasioned by a railroad right-of-way beneath the street. Without looking to his left again, he continued to cross the intersection. Just as he reached the center of Hunting Park Avenue, defendant, driving west in the north cartway of Hunting Park Avenue, passed the red light and ran into the left rear of plaintiff’s car. Plaintiff *645did not see defendant approaching until the collision.

Blind reliance on a favorable traffic signal is fatal to recovery. *Byrne v. Schultz,*306 Pa. 427, 160 A. 125; *Galliano v. East Penn Electric Co.,*303 Pa. 498, 154 A. 805. But to look and to see nothing of danger is not blind reliance. *Graff v. Scott Bros., Inc.,*315 Pa. 262, 266, 172 A. 659. A motorist need not anticipate that after he is committed to the crossing another will travel 50 to 60 feet to the intersection, pass a red light and run into him. *Harris v. Moran,*121 Pa. Superior Ct. 16, 182 A. 660. Moreover, since plaintiff was crossing a two-way street, he had a duty to look to his right as he approached the middle *(Freedman v. Ziccardi,*151 Pa. Superior Ct. 159, 30 A. (2d) 172); even without the additional protection of the signal the failure to continue to look to the left, having looked at the curb line, is not contributory negligence as matter of law. *Lewis v. Hermann,*112 Pa. Superior Ct. 338, 342, 171 A. 109; *Lockhead v. Nierenberg,*143 Pa. Superior Ct. 507, 511, 18 A. (2d) 472.

Plaintiff’s contributory negligence was clearly for the jury.

Judgments affirmed.

1

 Joined with the individual plaintiff was the Casualty Co. which insured him for damages to his automobile.
Exhibit 10.37

[LETTERHEAD OF ROCHE PHARMACEUTICALS]

Dr. Dani Bolognesi

Trimeris, Inc.

3500 Paramount Parkway

Morrisville, NC 27560

U.S.A.

Basel, 13 March 2007

Re: Roche/Trimeris Research Agreement dated
January 1, 2000 (as amended)

Dear Dani:

Roche elects
to Opt Out pursuant to Article 5 of the Third Amendment to the Research Agreement and Accord. Accordingly, the rights and obligations set forth in Article 5(a) through (e) are activated. In addition, Trimeris will have the right to develop and
commercialize TRI-1144 as it chooses. Trimeris will pay to Roche a royalty of one percent (1%) of Net Sales of all products containing TRI-1144 in every country in which Trimeris owns an unexpired patent that claims the making, using, selling,
offering for sale, or importing of TRI-1144, up to an aggregated total on royalties set at twenty-four million dollars (US$24,000,000).

Pursuant to
Paragraph 5 of the Third Amendment to the Research Agreement and Accord, Roche retains its right to develop up to five (5) Penzberg peptides subject to Trimeris right to co-develop any such peptide accepted by Roche into development
before December 31, 2008.

Roche and Trimeris will share all costs associated with the TRI-1144 joint research program for 2007, through the date of
execution of this letter.

This letter is being provided in duplicate originals. If Trimeris agrees with the above paragraph, please sign and return one
original.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|Best regards,                                    
|                                                 
|/s/ William M. Burns                             
|William M. Burns                                 
|                                                 
|Agreed and Accepted:                             
|                                                 
|Trimeris, Inc.                                   
|                                                 
|/s/ Dani P. Bolognesi                            
|Dani P. Bolognesi, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-04-011-CV

CHARLES DEAN STILLEY	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 43RD DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Charles Dean Stilley is attempting to appeal the trial court’s October 15, 2003 “Agreed Final Judgment of Forfeiture.”  His motion for new trial was due November 14, 2003, but was not filed until November 17, 2003. Stilley filed a notice of appeal on January 13, 2004.  Because the motion for new trial was not timely filed, the notice of appeal was due November 14, 2003, and was not timely filed.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1.

	On March 18, 2004, we notified Appellant that his notice of appeal was untimely and that we would dismiss this case for want of jurisdiction unless Appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court on or before March 29, 2004, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.  Appellant requested an extension of the deadline for responding to our jurisdictional letter, which we granted and gave him until April 12, 2004, to respond.  Appellant still did not file a response.

	The timely filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional in this court, and absent a timely filed notice or extension request, we must dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b), 26.3, 42.3(a); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997).  Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

							PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DELIVERED: May 6, 2004
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Lawson Software, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, RobertG. Barbieri, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ ROBERT G. BARBIERI                                                                     |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert  G. Barbieri*Executive Vice President  and Chief Financial and Performance Officer* |
|   |                                                                                       |
|   | October 10,  2005                                                                     |

 

----
|Exhibit 8.1
|-----------



|SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES
|------------------------



|The table below
sets forth all of our direct and  indirect  significant  subsidiaries  and the percentage
of equity of each  subsidiary we owned directly  or indirectly as of December 31, 2003:
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Name of Company                                                                             | Percentage
      Owned
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------
| | Propimex, S.A.
      de C.V., a Mexican corporation                                         | 99.99%                
| | Inmuebles del Golfo,
      S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation                              | 99.99%                
| | Corporación
      Interamericana de Bebidas, S.A. de C.V., 
          a Mexican corporation | 99.97%                
| | Panamco México,
      S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation                                   | 98.14%                
| | Panamco Bajío,
      S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation                                    | 93.37%                



| |  | 
| |  | 



---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1


                    COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA LOSS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                For the Period October 1,       Six months
                                                1995 (date of inception)          Ended
                                                  to December 31, 1995         June 30, 1996
                                                -------------------------      -------------
<S>                                             <C>                            <C>
Net loss                                               $ (208,986)               $ (773,768)

Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding           5,175,000                 5,175,000

Pro forma net loss per share                           $     (.04)               $     (.15)
</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2  Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Wilbert Knol

Wilbert KnolInterim Chief Financial OfficerDate: December 21, 2006
EXHIBIT 23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-125740, 333-116969,333-71328, and 333-100233 on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement Nos. 333-111573, 333-109096,333-80384, 333-21493 and 333-62929 on Form S-3 of I-Flow Corporation of our reports dated March 17,2008, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of I-Flow Corporation(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating tothe Company’s adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes*in2007) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of I-Flow Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPDELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPCosta Mesa, California
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1604]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

GARTH PATTERSON--FRIEND OF THE FISHERMEN, FRIEND OF MASSACHUSETTS, AND 
                            MY GREAT FRIEND

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. BARNEY FRANK

                            of massachusetts

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts. Mr. Speaker, I have never had to learn 
more about an issue in my life than when I learned in 1992 that the 
City of New Bedford and its fishing industry was included in the new 
Congressional district that I have proudly represented. New Bedford is 
one of the most successful fishing ports in the county, and in fact for 
the 12th consecutive year New Bedford had the highest-valued catch of 
any port in the United States. Fishing is not only a vital part of the 
economy of the region, but an integral component of its culture and 
social makeup. I could not represent the needs of such a unique 
community without a talented staff, and I am honored that my longtime 
aide, Garth Patterson, is the recipient of the 2012 Friend of the 
Fisherman Award recognizing his exemplary work.
  He received this award from the fishing community of New Bedford 
because of the high quality of the work he has done to provide the kind 
of first-rate public service and advocacy that is so essential to the 
continued survival of the fishing industry. In some cases, our advocacy 
can be uncomplicated, but there are also cases where mastering a very 
complex body of data is essential if we are to do our job right. Garth 
provided me with an extraordinary degree of technical expertise, 
practical knowledge, political savvy, and an ability to understand all 
viewpoints and articulate his own. He has been an enormous asset not 
only to me, but also to those concerned with the survival of the 
fishing industry.
  Mr. Speaker, I join the fishermen in thanking Garth. He is a tireless 
advocate for the community, and his nearly quarter century of public 
service is the quintessential model of how constituent relations should 
be conducted. I am proud that he is receiving this award, proud of his 
hard work for the people of Massachusetts, and proud to call him my 
friend.

                          ____________________
```