alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BARCLAYS OFFICIAL CALIFORNIA CODE OF

REGULATIONS

TITLE 13. MOTOR VEHICLES

DIVISION 3. AIR RESOURCES BOARD

CHAPTER 5. STANDARDS FOR MOTOR

VEHICLE FUELS

ARTICLE 1. STANDARDS FOR GASOLINE

SUBARTICLE 2. STANDARDS FOR GASOLINE

SOLD BEGINNING MARCH 1, 1996

This database is current through 12/26/08, Register

2008, No. 52

§ 2263.7. Multiple Notification Requirements.

Where a producer or importer is subject to multiple notification requirements pursuant to sections

2264(a)(2)(A), 2265.1 (applicable only to producers and

importers that produce gasoline), 2265.5 (applicable

only to producers and importers that produce gasoline),

2264.2(a)(2), 2264.2(b)(2), 2265(a)(2), 2266(c) or

2266.5(b), the producer or importer shall combine the

notifications to the extent practicable.

<General Materials (GM) - References, Annotations, or

Tables>

Note: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013,

43013.1, 43018 and 43101, Health and Safety Code;

and Western Oil and Gas Ass'n. v. Orange County Air

Pollution Control District, 14 Cal.3d 411, 121 Cal. Rptr.

249 (1975). Reference: Sections 39000, 39001, 39002,

39003, 39010, 39500, 39515, 39516, 41511, 43000,

43013, 43013.1, 43016, 43018 and 43101, Health and

Safety Code; and Western Oil and Gas Ass'n. v. Orange

County Air Pollution Control District, 14 Cal.3d 411,

121 Cal. Rptr. 249 (1975).

HISTORY

1. New section filed 2-28-96; operative 2-28-96 pursuant to Government Code

section 11343.4(d) (Register 96, No. 9).

2. Amendment of Note filed 8-3-2000; operative 9-2-2000 (Register 2000, No.

31).

3. Amendment filed 8-29-2008; operative 8-29-2008 pursuant to Government

Code section 11343.4 (Register 2008, No. 35).

13 CCR § 2263.7, 13 CA ADC § 2263.7

13 CA ADC § 2263.7

END OF DOCUMENT

13 CA ADC § 2263.7 Page 1

13 CCR § 2263.7

Cal. Admin. Code tit. 13, § 2263.7

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
ex10-42.htm


EX 10.42


 


Fourth Amendment


To


Change of Control and Severance Benefits Agreement


 


This Fourth Amendment (the “Fourth Amendment”) to Change of Control and Severance Benefits Agreement is made this 10h day of March, 2011, by and between ImageWare Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on the one hand, and David Harding, Vice President of Engineering and Chief Technical Officer, on the other hand (the “Executive”).  


                    


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into a Change of Control and Severance Benefits Agreement dated as of May 21, 2007 which was then  subsequently amended on September 27, 2008 and again on April 6, 2009 and again on December 10, 2009   (the “Severance Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Executive continues to perform valuable services for the Company and the Company desires to assure itself of the continuing services of Executive; and


 


WHEREAS, in consideration of the foregoing and in order to amend the terms of the Agreement and to provide for the continued services of the Executive in accordance with the present intent of the Company and the Executive.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in further consideration of the mutual covenants contained in the Severance Agreement, the parties do hereby agree that the Severance Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


 


Section “2. Term of Agreement”  strike the language “continue until December 31, 2010” and replace it with “continue until December 31, 2011”.


 


 


 



	/s/ ImageWare Systems, Inc.	 	/s/ David Harding	 
	ImageWare Systems, Inc.	 	David Harding
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-60528

Conference Calendar

 

JAMES PACE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ROBERT CULPEPPER, DR.; DAVID CARLSON, DR.;

CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY;

JAMES V. ANDERSON, Commissioner of the 

Mississippi Department of Corrections,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:00-CV-77

--------------------

April 10, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Pace, Mississippi prisoner #72176, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for

failure to state a claim and as legally frivolous under 28 U.S.C.

§§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) & (ii). In his complaint, Pace alleged that

the appellees denied him proper medical treatment and medication

for his back problems. He also asserted that he was placed in
No. 01-60528

-2-

work assignments that were contrary to his medical classification.

We find that Pace’s claims are legally frivolous, and we

affirm the district court’s judgment on this ground. See Neitzke

v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989). Pace’s contentions amount

to a mere disagreement with the course of his treatment which is

not cognizable in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. At most, Pace’s

allegations amount to assertions of medical malpractice or

negligence, rather than an Eighth Amendment denial of medical

care. See Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). 

We also reject Pace’s claim regarding his work assignments. 

Jackson v. Cain, 864 F.2d 1235, 1246 (5th Cir. 1989).

Pace avers that the magistrate judge was biased and that his

consent to proceed before the magistrate judge was not knowing

and voluntary. Pace has failed to establish that he was denied

an impartial tribunal. See Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S.

540, 555-56 (1994). We also conclude that Pace’s consent to

proceed before the magistrate judge was knowing and voluntary. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1); Mendes Jr. Int’l Co. v. M/V SOKAI

MARU, 978 F.2d 920, 924 (5th Cir. 1992). 

The district court’s dismissal of Pace’s complaint as

frivolous counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). Pace

is warned that he has one strike and that if he accumulates two

more, he will not be able to bring a civil action or an appeal

proceeding in forma pauperis unless he is under imminent danger

of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

AFFIRMED; STRIKE WARNING ISSUED. 
No. 01-60528

-3-
Final Notes July 9, 2010

Steam Study Data Review Notes

Dissolved Hexavalent Chromium EPA Method 218.6 (1994)

Ion chromatography

1. If the laboratory judges that the influent samples contained sulfate and chloride 

concentrations that were high enough to cause column overload, the affected samples 

should be diluted by the laboratory (218.6/4.1.3). If reported, note if the laboratory 

diluted samples to prevent column overload.

2. Samples should be adjusted to room temperature prior to analysis (218.6/11.1).

3. A rinse blank should be used to flush the system between all solution changes and 

suitable rinse times should be determined and used to prevent memory interferences

(200.8/4.1.5). If reported, indicate how many rinse blanks were run and state any 

contamination noted. 

4. For aqueous samples, a field blank should be prepared and analyzed at each sample point 

during one of the four days of sample collection. If the analyte concentration was greater 

than the MDL, indicate the concentration.

5. **Both masses 52 and 53 should be analyzed and mass 52 used to determine the 

concentration of Cr(VI) in the samples (200.8/11.4.4/Table 4).

6. Results should be corrected based on Cr(VI) contamination found in the LRB. Indicate 

whether the laboratory automatically made these corrections. 

7. *If the analyte concentration in a sample was less than 5 times the analyte concentration 

in the laboratory/method blank, the result should be reported as a nondetect. List all 

affected samples.

8. *If the analyte concentration in a sample was less than 10 times but greater than 5 times 

the analyte concentration in the laboratory/method blank, the result should reported as an 

estimated value. List all affected samples.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5710]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. HANNA:
       H.R. 6324.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 18
       To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for 
     carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other 
     Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the 
     United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with thisAnnual Report of UnionBanCal Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, David I. Matson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:  March 1, 2006

 

 
|   | By:                     | /s/ David I. Matson |   |
|--------|-------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|   | David I. Matson         |                |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |                |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cooper Industries, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Kirk S. Hachigian, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Kirk S. HachigianKirk S. Hachigian
Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Operating Officer
 May 9, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5076 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5076

 To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to extend the examination 
           cycle for certain insured depository institutions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 20, 2018

  Ms. Tenney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to extend the examination 
           cycle for certain insured depository institutions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Bank Exam Cycle Improvement 
Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. EXAMINATION CYCLE.

    Section 10(d) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 
1820(d)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4)(A), by striking ``$1,000,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$3,000,000,000''; and
            (2) in paragraph (10), by striking ``$1,000,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$3,000,000,000''. 
                                 <all>
```
# Lee - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Three Rivers Planning and Development District Executive Director Vernon R. Kelley III Email &#x76;&#x72;&#x6b;&#x40;&#116;&#114;pdd&#x2e;&#x63;&#x6f;&#x6d;The post Three Rivers Planning and Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,611,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,084,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,404,000
<INVENTORY>                                     49,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,108,000
<PP&E>                                       1,168,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 630,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,828,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,161,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,615,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,828,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,670,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,765,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,420,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             6,320,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,387,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,222,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (308,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (13,914,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (463,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (14,377,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.34)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of City Network, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Yun-Yi Tseng,  Chief
Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies,  in  all  material  respects,  with  the
          requirements  of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange
          Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                           /s/ Yun-Yi Tseng
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Yun-Yi Tseng
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           August 21, 2006


THIS  CERTIFICATION  IS MADE  SOLELY FOR  PURPOSES  OF 18 U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
SUBJECT  TO THE  KNOWLEDGE  STANDARD  CONTAINED  THEREIN,  AND NOT FOR ANY OTHER
PURPOSE.

A SIGNED  ORIGINAL  OF THIS  WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED  BY SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE
COMPANY AND  FURNISHED TO THE  SECURITIES  AND EXCHANGE  COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF
UPON REQUEST.  THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE "FILED" AS PART
OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB THAT IT ACCOMPANIES.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1455 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1455

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade for the vessel MOVIN ON, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 1995

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade for the vessel MOVIN ON, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VESSEL DOCUMENTATION.

    Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, 
chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App. 289), and sections 12106 through 12108 of 
title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue 
a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel MOVIN ON, United 
States official number 585100.
                                 <all>
```
January 17, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FELIX D. ZAVALA, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00962-CR V.

NO. 14-11-00963-CR

NO. 14-11-00964-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4952 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a study 

and submit a report on the effects of the inclusion of quality increases 

in the determination of blended benchmark amounts under part C of 

the Medicare program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2018 

Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. KIND) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 

and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

conduct a study and submit a report on the effects 

of the inclusion of quality increases in the determination 

of blended benchmark amounts under part C of the 

Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4952 IH

1 SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF BLENDED BENCHMARK 

2 AMOUNT STUDY. 

3 (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con4 gress that the inclusion of quality increases in the deter5 mination of blended benchmark amounts under section 

6 1853(n)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w– 

7 23(n)(4)) undermines the goal of delivering high-quality 

8 care under the Medicare program under title XVIII of 

9 such Act. 

10 (b) STUDY AND REPORT.—Not later than one year 

11 after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary 

12 of Health and Human Services, in consultation with rel13 evant stakeholders, shall conduct a study and submit to 

14 Congress a report on the effects of the inclusion of quality 

15 percentage increases under section 1853(n)(5) of such Act 

16 in the determination of blended benchmark amounts under 

17 section 1853(n)(4) of such Act. Such study and report 

18 shall include an analysis of the following: 

19 (1) The authority of the Secretary to remove 

20 such increases from the determination of such 

21 amounts. 

22 (2) The effects of including such increases in 

23 the determination of such amounts on Medicare Ad24 vantage organizations (including the effects on any 

25 contracts entered into by such organizations). 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4952 IH

1 (3) The financial impact of including such in2 creases in the determination of such amounts by 

3 county. 

4 (4) The effects of including such increases in 

5 the determination of such amounts on individuals 

6 enrolled in a plan under part C of title XVIII of 

7 such Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                     SIXTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


          THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT, made as of the 1st day of March, 2000, by and
between MECHANICAL DYNAMICS, INC., a Michigan corporation (the "Company"),
having offices located at 2301 Commonwealth Blvd., Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105,
and ROBERT R. RYAN, of Brighton, Michigan ("Employee"), for the purpose of
amending that certain Employment Agreement between the Company and Employee
dated as of April 1, 1994, and amended by agreements dated as of March 1, 1995,
as of March 1, 1996, as of March 1, 1997, as of March 1, 1998, and as of March
1, 1999 (collectively, the "Employment Agreement").


          WITNESSETH:

          WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to extend the Employment
Agreement for an additional one-year period.

          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual
covenants contained herein and in the Employment Agreement, the parties hereto
agree as follows:

          A. Section 2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to extend
the term of said Agreement through March 31, 2002.

          B. Except as expressly modified herein, the Employment Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Sixth
Amendment as of the day and year first above written.

WITNESS:                                                COMPANY

                                                 MECHANICAL DYNAMICS, INC.


/s/ Linda K. Moore                              By: /s/ Michael E. Korybalski
-------------------------------               ----------------------------------
                                                    Michael E. Korybalski,
                                                    Chief Executive Officer


                                                           EMPLOYEE


/s/ Linda K. Moore                                  /s/ Robert R. Ryan
-------------------------------               ----------------------------------
                                                    Robert R. Ryan