alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 478 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 478

     To require the imposition of sanctions against Iran's Islamic 
           Revolutionary Guard Corps, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2017

Mr. Poe of Texas (for himself and Mr. Sherman) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To require the imposition of sanctions against Iran's Islamic 
           Revolutionary Guard Corps, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``IRGC Terrorist Sanctions Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. SANCTIONS AND REPORT BY PRESIDENT.

    (a) Sanctions.--The President shall, not later than 30 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, designate Iran's Islamic 
Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist entity under section 1(b) of 
Executive Order 13224 of September 24, 2001, and impose sanctions 
against Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps under section 1(b) of 
Executive Order 13224 of September 24, 2001, or under any other 
provision of law, as applicable.
    (b) Report.--
            (1) In general.--The President shall submit to Congress a 
        report that contains the results of the imposition of sanctions 
        under subsection (a).
            (2) Form.--The report under paragraph (1) should be 
        submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified 
        annex.
                                 <all>
```
5 of 5: Coal Acid Gas & Pet Coke Floor Spreadsheets RobertJ Wayland to: Cortney_Higgins
11/21/2011 03:51 PM
Cc: Bill Maxwell

Petcoke_Floor_analysis_111811.xlsx

Coal_Acid_Gases_Floor analysis_111811.xlsx
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                          2,175,604
<SECURITIES>                                    1,038,496
<RECEIVABLES>                                     197,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                        65,712
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                3,987,949
<PP&E>                                         22,732,692
<DEPRECIATION>                                  4,394,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 34,683,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,306,849
<BONDS>                                        12,229,106
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          158,619
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,989,132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   34,683,706
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               19,458,852
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   8,273,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                8,847,550
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,023,906
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,050,889
<INCOME-TAX>                                      123,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,927,889
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,927,889
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.13
        



</TABLE>
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1658/2006

of 9 November 2006         

amending the rates of refunds applicable to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the market in the sugar sector (1), and in particular Article 33(2)(a) and (4) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of refund fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1433/2006 are hereby altered as shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 November 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 November 2006.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 270, 29.9.2006, p. 58.

----

ANNEX

Rates of refunds applicable from 10 November 2006 to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty (1)

----

(1)  The rates set out in this Annex are not applicable to exports to Bulgaria, with effect from 1 October 2004, to Romania with effect from 1 December 2005, and to the goods listed in Tables I and II to Protocol No 2 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 exported to the Swiss Confederation or to the Principality of Liechtenstein with effect from 1 February 2005.

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Patrick Soon-Shiong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as
of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                              
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2007 |  | /S/ PATRICK SOON-SHIONG, M.D.
|                     |  | Patrick Soon-Shiong, M.D.    
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer      

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification
will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

      CERTIFICATION BY BRUCE L. CLELAND, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PURSUANT
           TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Bruce Cleland, the Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company,
Inc., as general partner of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P., certify
that (i) the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 of Campbell
Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P. fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P.

                                 CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P.
                                 By: Campbell & Company, Inc., general partner

                                 By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland
                                    -------------------------------
                                     Bruce L. Cleland
                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                     March 28, 2003


                                      E 2
##### 



CURRENT COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
 Base Salary
 K. S. Hachigian  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
    
    $
    1,000,000T. A. Klebe  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
    
    $
    500,000P. M. Isabella  Executive Vice President, Cooper Connection
    
    $
    420,000D. R. Sheil  Senior Vice President, Human Resources and
Chief Administrative Officer
    
    $
    388,500G. L. Gawronski  Vice President, International Operations
    
    $
    300,000
#### Willie T. EDWARDS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Dustin Wade Molbert, on behalf of the Estate and on behalf of the Survivor, Willie T. Edwards, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OKALOOSA COUNTY, Defendant, Larry Gilbert, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Okaloosa County and Leon Blackshear, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-2476.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 21, 1994.

Randall C. Berg, Jr., Peter M. Siegel, Florida Justice Institute, Inc., Miami, FL, for plaintiff-appellant.

Julius F. Parker, Jr., Tallahassee, FL, for defendants-appellees.

Before COX and BIRCH, Circuit Judges, and SMITH *, Senior Circuit Judge.

*

 Honorable Edward S. Smith, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.

PER CURIAM:

The panel opinion is reported at 5 F.3d 1431 (11th Cir.1993). The panel opinion is modified in the following respects.

(1) The panel deletes the term “two-year” from the fourth paragraph of the opinion on page 1432; and

(2) The panel deletes the paragraph of the opinion appearing on page 1434 which begins “The Florida statute of limitations ...” and substitutes in its stead the. following paragraph:

> The Florida statute of limitations for Edwards’s pendent wrongful death claim against Sheriff Gilbert expired on October 11, 1990, four years after Molbert’s death. *See*Fla.Stat. ch. 768.28(12) (Supp.1992); *Beard v. Hambrick,*396 So.2d 708, 712 (Fla.1981). Thus, the statute had run while Edwards’s case was in federal court. This case had been pending over four years when the district court granted summary judgment and dismissed the pendent wrongful death claim, but nothing in the record suggests that Edwards caused this delay.

The petition for rehearing is denied.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  NEWPORT CORPORATION
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Nevada(State or other
jurisdiction of 
incorporation)
    
    000-01649(Commission File Number)
    
    94-0849175(IRS Employer Identification No.)1791 Deere Avenue, Irvine, California(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    92606(Zip Code)
 (949) 863-3144  (Registrants telephone number, including area code)
 Not Applicable  (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
   o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 2.05  Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.
   Range ofExpected ChargesEmployee termination costs
    
    $
    1,800,000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    3,000,000Facility, manufacturing transfer and other costs
    
    
    2,100,000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    4,000,000Asset write-offs (non-cash)
    
    
    1,600,000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,000,000Total Expected Charges in 2008
    
    $
    5,500,000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    9,000,000
   Item 7.01  Regulation FD Disclosure.
   Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures




---



##### 



Item 9.01  Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (d) Exhibits.
 Exhibit Number
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press release issued by the Registrant dated September 2,
2008 (furnished pursuant to Item 7.01 and not deemed
filed).
 SIGNATURES
  NEWPORT CORPORATIONDate: September 8, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Jeffrey B. CoyneJeffrey B. CoyneSenior Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary




---



##### 



Exhibit Index
 Exhibit Number
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press release issued by the Registrant dated September 2,
2008 (furnished pursuant to Item 7.01 and not deemed
filed).
1 

### Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Dwight Mallory <Dmallory@resoluteenergy.com>

Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 2:00 PM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Cc: Patrick Flynn

Subject: MCU Gas Analysis and Blower Capacity

Attachments: MCU Plant flare blower infor.pdf; removed.txt

Shaheerah,

Per our discussion this afternoon regarding Resolute’s comments to the draft PSD permit, attached are 2014 gas

analyses representative of gas combusted in the MCU Main Flare. Also attached is documentation of the existing, fixed

‐ speed, air

‐ assist blower capacity of 4,346 CFM.

Dwight E. Mallory

Environmental/Regulatory Manager

Resolute Energy Corporation

1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2800

Denver, CO 80203

Direct: 303-573-4886 X 1165

This e

‐ mail message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential,

privileged, and proprietary information of Resolute Energy Corporation. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or

distribution may be prohibited under law. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply E

‐

mail of any erroneous transmission, and destroy the original E

‐ mail, any attachments, and all copies of the original

message. Thank you.
Exhibit 10.5 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

        ThisEMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is effective as of March 1, 2003, by andbetween **EMMIS OPERATING COMPANY**, an Indiana corporation (“Employer” or“Emmis”), and **RANDALL D. BONGARTEN**, a New York resident(“Executive”). 

RECITALS

        WHEREAS,Employer and its subsidiaries are engaged in the ownership and operation of certain radioand television stations, magazines, and related operations; and
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 1stConstitution Bancorp
(the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                                      
|----------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                 
|ROBERT F. MANGANO
|                 
|Name:             |  | Robert F. Mangano                    
|Title:            |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:             |  | May 13, 2004                         



|                  |  |                                    
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|                 
|JOSEPH M. REARDON
|                 
|Name:             |  | Joseph M. Reardon                  
|Title:            |  | Senior Vice President and Treasurer
|Date:             |  | May 13, 2004
No. 99-50671 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-50671 Summary Calendar

JUNIOR EARL ROBERTSON, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BERNEY KESZLER, Dr. Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No.SA-98-CV-295-JWP

-------------------- April 10, 2000 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Dr. Berney Keszler appeals the denial of his motion for summary judgment in which he asserted qualified immunity from the claims of a Texas inmate, Junior Robertson, for the denial of adequate medical care and for retaliation. This court has jurisdiction to review whether the issues of fact identified by the district court are material. Colston v. Barnhart , 146 F.3d 282, 284 (5th Cir.), denying petition for rehearing en banc , cert. denied , 119 S. Ct. 618 (1998).No. 99-50671 -2- The district court determined that genuine issues of material fact existed whether Dr. Keszler denied Robertson medical care between April 22 and May 5, 1997, and whether Dr. Keszler retaliated against Robertson because Robertson complained about Dr. Keszler. Our review of the record confirms that material issues of fact do exist. See Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 839-41 (1994); Estelle v. Gamble , 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976); McDonald v. Steward , 132 F.3d 225, 231 (5th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, the district court’s denial of Dr. Keszler’s motion for summary judgment is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.4

                               AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                 ARM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. 1997 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

     WHEREAS, ARM Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
has adopted the ARM Financial Group, Inc. 1997 Equity Incentive Plan (the
"Plan"; terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings ascribed to
them as set forth in the Plan);

     WHEREAS, Section 17 of the Plan permits the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors of the Company to amend the Plan at any time and from time to
time in whole or in part; and

     WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee desires to amend the Plan in the manner
set forth below.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

     1.   Paragraph (a) under the definition of "CHANGE IN CONTROL" in Section 2
of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting reference to "20%" and substituting in
its place "51%".

     2.   Except as set forth herein, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed
in all respects.

                                          
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 1 to the ARM Financial Group, Inc.
1997 Equity Incentive Plan has been executed as of the 22nd day of February,
1999.


                                   ARM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.


                                   By:  
                                          ----------------------------------
                                   Name:  Martin H. Ruby
                                   Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

ATTESTED TO:


By: 
       ---------------------------------
Name:  Patricia L. Tackett
Title: Secretary
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with this Annual Report of UnionBanCal Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Masaaki Tanaka, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Dated:
March 10, 2010

By:

/s/ MASAAKI TANAKA Masaaki Tanaka Chief Executive Officer


---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 492 

To ensure that any authority of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund to 

borrow amounts from the Treasury is used only to pay mortgage insurance claims. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2017 

Mr. CAPUANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To ensure that any authority of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund to borrow amounts from the Treasury is 

used only to pay mortgage insurance claims. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘End Unnecessary Bor5 rowing Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF BORROWING AUTHORITY. 

7 Paragraph (2) of section 205(f) of the National 

8 Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1711(f)(2)) is amended— 

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(2)’’; and 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 492 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub2 paragraphs: 

3 ‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A) may not be construed 

4 to authorize or require the Secretary to borrow any 

5 amounts to comply with the capital ratio require6 ment under such subparagraph. 

7 ‘‘(C) Notwithstanding any other provision of 

8 law, any authority of the Secretary under this Act 

9 or otherwise to borrow amounts from the Treasury 

10 of the United States for the Mutual Mortgage Insur11 ance Fund may be used only to the extent necessary 

12 to pay claims on mortgage insurance that is an obli13 gation of such Fund.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23.1





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Nos.
333-03040, 333-67581, 333-67581-01,  333-67581-02,  333-67581-03,  333-67581-04,
333-72979, 333-67579, 333-109304, 333-109304-01,  333-109304-02,  333-109304-03,
and  333-109981  on  Form  S-3  and  Registration   Statements  Nos.  333-03042,
333-03044,  333-27987,  333-95497,  333-103009,  and  333-109941  on Form S-8 of
UnionBanCal  Corporation of our report dated January 21, 2004 (February 19, 2004
as to Note 26) (which report  expresses an  unqualified  opinion and includes an
explanatory  paragraph for previously  recognized  goodwill and other intangible
assets), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of UnionBanCal Corporation
for the year ended December 31, 2003.


/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


San Francisco, California
March 12, 2004