alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Evonne Capers, Plaintiff-Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Grote Street Apartments, LP, Omni New York LLC, Reliant Realty Service Inc., Defendants-Respondents.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Verna L. Saunders, J.), entered on or about November 5, 2015, after trial, in favor of defendants dismissing the action.</p><p>Per Curiam. </p><p>Judgment (Verna L. Saunders, J.), entered on or about November 5, 2015, affirmed, without costs.</p><p>A judgment rendered in the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court will be sustained on appeal unless it is shown that "substantial justice has not been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (CCA 1807; <i>see Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125 [2000], <i>lv dismissed </i>95 NY2d 898 [2000]). Applying that limited standard of review here, we find no basis to substitute our judgment for that of the trial court in dismissing plaintiff's negligence and related claims after a full trial. The record permits a finding that defendants caused no compensable loss or damage to plaintiff's personalty in connection with defendants' installation of a new door to plaintiff's apartment.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: October 19, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from IVP
Technology Corporation's balance sheet as of December 31, 2000 and statement of
operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2000, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<NAME>  IVP Technology Corporation
<CIK>   0001011601
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,424
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,876
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,748
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          447,295
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,111
<OTHER-SE>                                   (477,658)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,748
<SALES>                                         40,002
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,002
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (2,470,015)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,430,013)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,430,013)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,430,013)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)





</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 15

January 14, 2004

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Emmis Communications Corporation and Subsidiaries

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-83890, 333-14657, 333-42878, 333-71904 and 333-92318) of
Emmis Communications Corporation and the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-62172) of Emmis Communications
Corporation and Emmis Operating Company (collectively, Emmis) of our report
dated January 5, 2003 relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim
financial statements of Emmis Communications Corporation and Emmis Operating
Company that are included in Emmis Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November
30, 2003. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is
not part of the registration statement prepared or certified by accountants
within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933. It should
be noted that we have not performed any procedures subsequent to January 5,
2003.

Very truly yours,

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Exhibit 23.1



               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-91000, 333-03721, and 333-11775) of NETCOM On-Line
Communication Services, Inc. of our report dated February 5, 1997, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of NETCOM On-Line communication
Services, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended
December 31, 1996.


                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Jose, California
March 27, 1997
A FS

- 16

- 9610

- E

April 18 , 2016

Exemption No. 8676 E

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2005

- 22250

Mr. Alan Bobo

Vice President/Director of Operations

NetJets Aviation, Inc.

4111 Bridgeway Avenue

Col umbus, OH 43219

Dear Mr. Bobo :

This letter is to inform you that we have g ranted your petition to extend Exemption

No. 8676 , as amended . It expl ains the basis for our decision, describes its effect , and lists the

conditions and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated January 25

, 2016

, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA)

on behalf of NetJets Aviation, Inc. ( NetJets) for an extension of Exemption No. 8676 , as amended. That exemption from § 91.205(b ) (12) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations

allo ws NetJets to operate over water and beyond power

- off gliding distance from shore

without at least one pyrotechnic signaling device

.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reason s relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register beca use the requested extension of the exe mption would not set a

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to NetJets.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8676 , as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore,

under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113

, and 44701, which the FAA Administrator

has delegat ed to me, I grant NetJets Aviation, Inc. (NetJets) an exemption from 14 CFR

§ 91.205(b)(12) to the extent necessary to allow NetJets to operate over water and beyond

power

- off gliding distance from shore without at least one pyrotechnic signaling device

, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Each flight operated und er this exemption must be conducted in compliance with

§§ 121.125(a)(1), (2), (c) and (d); 121.127(a)(1), (2), and (b); 121.597(a), (b), and (c);

and 121.689(a), (b), and (c).

2. Each flight operated under part 135 must be conducted in accordance with NetJet s ’s

operations specifications.

3. Each flight operated under part 91K must be conducted in accordance with NetJets ’s

management specifications.

4. Prior to conducting operations under this exemption, NetJets must obtain amended

operations specifications and man agement specifications listing this exemption.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8676 , as amended, to

September 3 0 , 201 8

, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S . Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO § 906
OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§ 1350)


The undersigned, as the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Allied Holdings, Inc., certifies that,
to the best of his knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, which
accompanies this certification fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Allied
Holdings, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.
The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§ 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other
purpose.

This 13th day of April, 2004.



| |                                          
| | -----------------------------------------
| | /s/ HUGH E. SAWYER                       
| | Hugh E. Sawyer                           
| | President and Chief Executive
    Officer

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Allied Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Allied
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The information in this Exhibit 32.1 shall
not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it
be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth
by specific reference in such filing.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134747 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134747 COA: 267263 Saginaw CC: 05-025682-FC QUENTON JAUNE LL DEBERRY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 24, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0317 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2008

Clerk
|Exhibit 8.1
|-----------



|SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES
|------------------------



|The table below
sets forth all of our direct and indirect significant  subsidiaries and the percentage of
equity of each subsidiary we owned directly  or indirectly as of December 31, 2002.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Name of Company                                                  |  | Percentage
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------
| |                                                                  |  |           
| | Propimex, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation                    |  | 99.99%    
| | Inmuebles del Golfo, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation         |  | 99.99%    
| | Refrescos y Aguas Minerales, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation |  | 99.99%    
| | Coca-Cola FEMSA de Buenos Aires S.A., an Argentine corporation   |  | 99.99%    
| |                                                                  |  |
Sam Azad ·City Manager Mark Lovin Director of Aviation

May 7, 2015

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer 

# PUEBLO

Chief, Essential Air Service & Domestic Analysis Division, X-53 United States Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Schlemmer; Pueblo Memorial Airport 3120I Bryan Circle, Ste. 200 Pueblo, CO 81001 Phone (719) 553-2760

Fax (719) 553-2761

Thankyou for your response to our offer of2.5%, $44,411, for service years 2015-2016, Docket DOT-OST1999-6589, for Great Lakes Airlines to provide essential air service at Pueblo Memorial Airport, and in compliance with provisions ofthe Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and Reform Act of 2012" (Public LawNo. 112-95). As you may be aware, the City ofPueblo is an economically distressed community qualifying for reduced grant requirements for Airport Improvement Program grants. Specifically, the traditional grant match is 10%. However, in the case ofthe City ofPueblo that requirement is 5%. In addition, a review ofrelevant data indicates a median household income of$34,633, which is 47.7% ofthe average income of$66,215 statewide. Additionally, the unemploymentrate in the City ofPueblo is 7.5% compared to the Colorado comparative nine city average of5.62%. As a result ofthese statistics and in response to the counter offer, the City ofPueblo is prepared to contribute to the awarded airline subsidy 5% oftherequested $1,776,448 assistance, or $88,822 for service years 2015- 2016.
Thank you.

Sincerely,
SamAzad City Manager City ofPueblo
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 6, 2009
 ENDOCARE, INC.
  Delaware
    
    001-15063
    
    33-0618093(State or Other Jurisdiction of
    
    (Commission
    
    (I.R.S. EmployerIncorporation)
    
    File Number)
    
    Identification Number)
 201 Technology Drive
Irvine, California 92618
 (949) 450-5400
 N/A
 see
 o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain OfficersSIGNATURES    Table of Contents  
 Item 5.02
    
    Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of
Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  ENDOCARE, INC.April 7, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Michael R. RodriguezMichael R. RodriguezSenior Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 2, 2015

No. 04

- 15

- 00613

- CV

IN RE Lawrence SHIPLEY III

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

On September 30, 2015, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus with a motion for

emergency stay and temporary relief. This court is of the opinion that a serious question

concerning the mandamus relief sought re quires further consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in interest may file a response to the petition in

this court no later than October 23, 2015

. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 5 2.4.

Relator’s request for emergency and temporary relief is GRANTED IN PART. The

enforcement of the trial court’s temporary order, announced September 16, 2015, obligating

relator to pay interim attorney’s fees to counsel for real party in interest is TE MPORARILY

STAYED pending further order of this court.

It is so ORDERED on October 2, 2015

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

______________________________ ___

Keith E. Hottle , Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2012

- CI

- 13421 , styled In the Interest of L.N.S., A Minor Child , pending

in the 166th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Stephani A. Walsh presiding.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-14933 and Form S-8 No. 333-40899) pertaining to the Digene
Diagnostics, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan, the Digene Diagnostics, Inc. 1991-A
Stock Option Plan, the Digene Diagnostics, Inc. 1991-B Stock Option Plan, the
Digene Corporation Omnibus Plan, the Digene Corporation Directors' Stock Option
Plan, and the Digene Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan of our reports dated
August 20, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Digene Corporation included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended June 30, 1999, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Washington, DC
September 27, 1999
### 02/21/2013 18:00 FAX 2024935142 FAA

### Law Offices
411 Aviation Way, Suite 245 Frederick, MD 21701 JOHNS. YODICE HONALD D. GO!.DEN KATHLEEN A. YODICI: Offir;e: (301} 695-2300 FAX: (301} 695-2151 www.yodice.com
TAL60T M. MARTINT MICHAEL A. YODICE PARALFGAL .£ebruary 15, 2013 . _ The Honorable Judge

### J.E. Sullivan 

### U.S. Administrative 

### Law Judge Office of Hearings, M-20 

### U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, 

### DC 20590 Re: In the Matter of Clifford Press, Docket No. FAA-201 1-1006 DearJudge Sullivan:**~** OMS 

### @001/001

RAYMOND C. SPECIALE LEONARD**CERUZZI~** ELIZABETH M. CANDF.LARIO•• OF COUN5CL

l' :• TCA&DC; ,(1 UNLY; -·PA&I.l(



### c::: ( •. :·

I am in receipt of your Notice of Pre-Hearing Status Conference, such conference to be held at 10:00 on Thursday, February 21, 2013. I am scheduled to be out oftown during the week of February 19111 at a legal conference, but I will make myself available by cell phona forthe conference, or I may make a member of myfirm available on a land-line, if you prefer. I apologize for any inconvenience this maycause.

# s~~:~**J)j;~~ c..-~·---** **oun~=~ord** Press 

### cc: FAA Hearing Docket (original) 

### Judith Vaughan, FAA Attorney 

# RECEIVED FEB

# 2 12013 

# HEARING DOCKET
PlNAL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AIR QUALITY CONTROL DISTRICT 

### 4jh :. ..i~i., POST OFFICE BOX 987, FLORENCE, ARIZONA 

### 85232- t. L~L~~~,-;J

I 

## r\ i, 

# Vu4 

# r

, * 

## fs/[/ld

Donald 

### P. Gabrielson Tel: 

### (520) 866-6926 

## 4810. Director Fax: 

### (520) 866-6967 

## 44

Notice of 

### Public Hearing

Pertaining to Revisionsto 

### Pinal County Air Quality Rules

In response to the mandate of A.R.S. 511-877 as amended by Section 16 of Laws 2007, Chapter292 ("Senate Bill 1552")the District proposes that the Board of Supervisors consider proposed revisions to the Pinal County Air Quality Control District Code of Regulations. Those mandates require stabilization of d~sturbed surfaces at vacant lots, including noticeto the owner and,where necessary,a right of entry bythe county in order to stabilize the offending area along with a corresponding right of recoupment against the owner in favor of the county. The affected area rncludes that portion of Pinal County lyingwithin the Phoenix Planning Area PMI0 nonattainment area, namely the Apache Junction Township, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian ("TIN R8E"). The Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 9.30 a.m. on June 18,2008, to consider the proposed revis~ons to the Air Quality Code of Regulations. The public hearing will be held inthe Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, 31 North Pinal St. Building A, Florence,Arizona. Copies of the proposed revisions are on-line In the May 16, 2008 edition of the Arizona Administrative Register, which is available on-line at www.azsos.gov. The proposal may also be inspected at the Pinal County Air Quality offices, at the address set forth below.Thosewishing further information regardrngany aspect ofthis proposal may contact Scott DiBiase, Planning Manager, Pinal CountyAir Quality, 31 North Pinal Street, Florence, 

## AZ.85232, or by calling 520-866-6929.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1536 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1536

   To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit Federal firearms 
  licensees to conduct firearms business with other such licensees at 
                        out-of-State gun shows.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 1996

 Mr. Thompson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit Federal firearms 
  licensees to conduct firearms business with other such licensees at 
                        out-of-State gun shows.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY OF FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSEES TO CONDUCT FIREARMS 
              BUSINESS WITH OTHER SUCH LICENSEES AT OUT-OF-STATE GUN 
              SHOWS.

    Section 923(j) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after the first sentence the following: ``Notwithstanding the 
preceding sentence, a licensee may conduct firearms business with 
another licensee at such a gun show or event without regard to whether 
the gun show or event is located in the State specified on the license 
of either licensee.''.
                                 <all>
```