alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1993-A, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         4,081
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               146,281
<PP&E>                                         4,012,931
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,714,203)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,445,009
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,962
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,434,047
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,445,009
<SALES>                                        539,371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               539,439
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  917,783<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (457,624)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (457,624)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (457,624)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
DISMISSED; Opinion Filed May 21, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00321-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.T., G.M. AND C.M., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 439th Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1-17-0922

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Osborne, and Nowell

Opinion by Justice Myers

This appeal follows the trial court’s order terminating Mother and Father’s parental rights 

to their children. The appeal was filed by the paternal grandfather, who asserted in the notice of 

appeal that he had intervened in the underlying suit. After reviewing the clerk’s record and finding 

nothing that reflected paternal grandfather had intervened, we directed him to file a letter brief 

addressing how he had standing to appeal the trial court’s termination order. See State v. Naylor, 

466 S.W.3d 783, 787 (Tex. 2015) (“appellate standing is typically afforded ‘only to parties of 

record’”) (quoting Gunn v. Cavanaugh, 391 S.W.2d 723, 724-25 (Tex. 1965)); Johnston v. Crook, 

93 S.W.3d 263, 268 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, pet. denied) (“[A]n intervenor is a 

party for purposes of appeal only if (1) she timely files a [plea of intervention], and (2) the trial 

court does not strike the pleading before the entry of final judgment.”). We explained that an 

appellate court generally has no jurisdiction over an appeal filed by an appellant who lacks 

standing and cautioned him that failure to comply by April 15, 2019 could result in dismissal of 
–2–

the appeal. See Naylor, 466 S.W.3d at 787 (“[A]n appeal filed by an improper party must be 

dismissed.”); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a),(c). To date, however, he has not responded.

Because the record does not reflect paternal grandfather intervened, he lacks standing to 

challenge the order of termination and we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. See Naylor, 466

S.W.3d at 787. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id.; see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

190321F.P05

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF T.T., G.M. AND 

C.M., CHILDREN

No. 05-19-00321-CV 

On Appeal from the 439th Judicial District 

Court, Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1-17-0922.

Opinion delivered by Justice Myers, 

Justices Osborne and Nowell participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered this 21st day of May, 2019.
Counties in Bold Contain Distressed Areas

County Economic Status and Number of Distressed Areas in 

Appalachian North Carolina, Fiscal Year 2020

County Status

Economic

Areas

Distressed

Number of

Alexander Transitional

Alleghany At-Risk 1

Ashe Transitional 3

Avery Transitional

Buncombe Transitional 5

Burke Transitional 5

Caldwell Transitional 2

Cherokee At-Risk

Clay At-Risk

Davie Transitional

Forsyth Transitional 30

Graham Distressed

Haywood Transitional 1

Henderson Transitional 2

Jackson At-Risk

McDowell At-Risk

Macon Transitional 1

Madison Transitional 1

Mitchell Transitional

Polk Transitional

Rutherford At-Risk 4

Stokes Transitional 1

Surry Transitional 2

Swain At-Risk

Transylvania Transitional

Watauga At-Risk 1

Wilkes Transitional 5

Yadkin Transitional 1

Yancey At-Risk 1

Appalachian Regional Commission, June 2019
Distressed Areas in Appalachian North Carolina, 

Fiscal Year 2020

County

Census Tract 

ID Number County

Census Tract 

ID Number

Alleghany 9502

Ashe 9702

Ashe 9703

Ashe 9705

Buncombe 2

Buncombe 9

Buncombe 13

Buncombe 15

Buncombe 25.06

Burke 201

Burke 212.01

Burke 212.03

Burke 213.02

Burke 214

Caldwell 301

Caldwell 302

Forsyth 2

Forsyth 3.01

Forsyth 3.02

Forsyth 4

Forsyth 5

Forsyth 6

Forsyth 7

Forsyth 8.01

Forsyth 8.02

Forsyth 9

Forsyth 10

Forsyth 14

Forsyth 15

Forsyth 16.01

Forsyth 16.02

Forsyth 17

Forsyth 18

Forsyth 19.01

Forsyth 19.02

Forsyth 20.01

Forsyth 20.02

Forsyth 27.01

Forsyth 27.02

Forsyth 27.03

Forsyth 34.03

Forsyth 34.04

Forsyth 35

Forsyth 37.01

Forsyth 38.05

Forsyth 39.03

Haywood 9209

Henderson 9312

Henderson 9314

Macon 9703.01

Madison 102

Rutherford 9608

Rutherford 9610

Rutherford 9611.01

Rutherford 9611.02

Stokes 703

Surry 9304

Surry 9310.03

Watauga 9205

Wilkes 9602

Wilkes 9603

Wilkes 9606

Wilkes 9607

Wilkes 9608.01

Yadkin 503

Yancey 9601.02

Appalachian Regional Commission, June 2019
WILKES

SWAIN

ASHE SURRY

BURKE

MACON

STOKES

BUNCOMBE HAYWOOD

JACKSON

MADISON

DAVIE

YADKIN

POLK

CALDWELL

FORSYTH

CLAY

CHEROKEE

RUTHERFORD

YANCEY

AVERY

MCDOWELL

GRAHAM

WATAUGA

HENDERSON

TRANSYLVANIA

ALLEGHANY

MITCHELL

ALEXANDER

0 25 50

Miles

Levels of 

Economic Status

Distressed County

At-Risk County

Transitional County

Competitive County

Attainment County

County Economic Status in Appalachian North Carolina, 

Fiscal Year 2020
WILKES

SURRY

SWAIN

BURKE

ASHE

MACON

STOKES

BUNCOMBE

JACKSON

HAYWOOD

CALDWELL

FORSYTH

POLK

RUTHERFORD

MADISON

YADKIN

CLAY

CHEROKEE

DAVIE

MCDOWELL

AVERY

YANCEY

GRAHAM

WATAUGA

HENDERSON

TRANSYLVANIA

MITCHELL

ALEXANDER

ALLEGHANY

N C 

County Economic Status and Distressed Areas in

Appalachian North Carolina, Fiscal Year 2020

S C G A 

T N 

V A 

Levels of 

Economic Status

Distressed County

At-Risk County

Distressed Area

Transitional County

Distressed Area

Competitive County

Attainment County

0 15 30

Miles
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

The following certificationaccompanies the issuer’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB and is not filed, asprovided in Release 33-8212. 34-47551 dated May 13, 2003.

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theaccompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Coast Bancorp for the quarterended June 30, 2003, I, Thomas J. Sherman, Chief Financial Officer ofCoast Bancorp, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  such quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CoastBancorp for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in such quarterlyreport on Form 10-QSB of Coast Bancorp for the quarter ended June 30,2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Coast Bancorp.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coast Bancorpand will be retained by Coast Bancorp and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated:  August 11, 2003 |                           |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                              |                           |
|                              |                           |
|                              | /s/  Thomas J. Sherman         |   |
|                              | Thomas  J. Sherman             |
|                              | Chief  Financial Officer       |
|                              | (Principal  Financial Officer) |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars               
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              JUN-30-1999          
<PERIOD-START>                 JUL-01-1998    
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1998    
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1    
<CASH>                                7,198   
<SECURITIES>                              0    
<RECEIVABLES>                             0    
<ALLOWANCES>                              0    
<INVENTORY>                               0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    166,218    
<PP&E>                              417,539   
<DEPRECIATION>                      238,318   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    2,930,978   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               518,411         
<BONDS>                                   0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             4,916,152   
<PREFERRED>                               0   
<COMMON>                         16,484,998   
<OTHER-SE>                        1,763,665   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      2,930,978         
<SALES>                                   0   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0   
<CGS>                                     0   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  714,982   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (2,695,200)   
<INCOME-TAX>                              0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (2,695,200)   
<DISCONTINUED>                            0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0   
<CHANGES>                                 0   
<NET-INCOME>                     (2,695,200)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (1.03)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (1.03)  
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Penn-America Group, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Jon S. Saltzman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Joseph F. Morris, Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Jon S. Saltzman                  
|Jon S. Saltzman                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer



March
11, 2004



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Joseph F. Morris                                        
|Joseph F. Morris                                            
|Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



March
11, 2004
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Walter Z. Berger, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the periodended November 30, 2003 of Emmis Communications Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2004   /s/ WALTER Z. BERGER Walter Z. Berger Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
5
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 28, 2015

NO. 03-15-00336-CV

Randy Jennings, Appellant

v.

Wells Fargo Bank, N .A., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on April 13, 2015. Having reviewed the 

record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this 

appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1592-E1593]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

ON THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE CREATION OF THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRADE 
                             REPRESENTATIVE

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. DAVE CAMP

                              of michigan

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Mr. CAMP. Mr. Speaker, fifty years ago this October, Congress 
directed the President to appoint a Special Representative for Trade 
Negotiations to lead the Administration's efforts to expand global 
trade. As a result, for the past 50 years, the U.S. Trade 
Representative has led the Executive Branch in aggressively opening 
markets to American-made goods and services and promoting economic 
growth and job creation through trade. USTR's leadership has 
contributed in significant ways to the tremendous economic growth that 
the United States enjoyed over the past 50 years and firmly established 
our global economic leadership.
  Across Administrations, USTR has maintained an admirable bipartisan 
and close working relationship with Congress. I've always said that the 
very best people become the U.S. Trade Representative. The 50-year 
history of USTR demonstrates that the men and women who have served as 
the U.S. Trade Representative are strategic thinkers and tough 
negotiators--the kind of intelligent, can-do people who have 
demonstrated their ability to advance our trade agenda. And the 
dedicated USTR employees who serve with them also exhibit that 
intellectual rigor and high caliber. I'm proud of all that they have 
accomplished in opening markets and enforcing our rights under our 
trade agreements.
  USTR is uniquely nimble, lean, and effective. In a world that has 
changed dramatically over the past 50 years, USTR's small size,

[[Page E1593]]

independence, and direct access to the President have been critical to 
its success. With these attributes intact, I am confident that USTR 
will continue to fulfill its mission effectively and commendably for 
the next 50 years.
  Today, I honor USTR on its 50th anniversary, the 16 men and women who 
have served as the U.S. Trade Representative, and the thousands who 
have proudly served under them. I wish USTR the best for another 50 
years.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF MAX CAPITAL GROUP LTD.

This certification is
provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 of Max Capital Group Ltd. (the
Issuer).

I, Joseph W. Roberts, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer, certify that:

(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Issuer.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: May 7, 2008



/s/ Joseph W. RobertsName:

Joseph W. RobertsTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
650 Town Center Drive, 20th Floor
Costa Mesa, California 92626-1925
Tel: (714) 540-1235 Fax: (714) 755-8290
www.lw.com(LATHAM WATKINS LLP)
    
    FIRM / AFFILIATE OFFICESBarcelona
Brussels
Chicago
Frankfurt
Hamburg
Hong Kong
London
Los Angeles
Madrid
Milan
Moscow
Munich
    
    New Jersey
New York
Northern Virginia
Orange County
Paris
San Diego
San Francisco
Shanghai
Silicon Valley
Singapore
Tokyo
Washington, D.C.File No. 043493-0004
  
 Re:
    
    Registration Statement on Form S-3; 19,704,032 shares of common stock, par
value $0.025 per share
  Company Exchange Shares Common Stock Shares Act Commission Registration Statement Prospectus
 DGCL




---



##### 



June 24, 2008
Page 2
 
 Restated Certificate Amendment
 Certificate of Incorporation
   Very truly yours,/s/ Latham & Watkins LLP
#### The Pennsylvania Railroad Company et al., appellants, *v.*The National Docks &c. Railway Company, respondent.

On appeal from an order advised by Vice-Chancellor Van Fleet, whose opinion is reported in *National Books Railway Co.*v. *Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 7 Bick. Ch. Rep. 58.*

*Mr. James B. Vredenburgh*and *Mr. Joseph D. Bedle,*for the appellants.

*Mr. Charles L. Corbin*and *Mr. John R. Emery,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

Order affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

*For affirmance*— The Chief-Justice, Abbett, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Mague, Reed, Van Syokel, Bogert, Brown, Krueger, Sims, Smith — 14.

*For reversal*— None.