alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Docket No.: 231107-0263]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, Department of Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of public availability.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with section 743 of Division C of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), the Department of Commerce (DOC) is publishing this notice to advise the public of the availability of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Service Contract Inventory data, a report that analyzes DOC's FY 2021 Service Contract Inventory and a plan for the analysis of FY 2022 Service Contract Inventory.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The Department of Commerce's FY 2021 Service Contract Inventory is included in the government-wide inventory available at:                         *https://www.acquisition.gov/​service-contract-inventory,*                         which can be filtered to display the FY 2021 inventory for each agency. In addition to the link to access DOC's FY 2021 service contract inventory, the FY 2021 Analysis Report and Plan for analyzing the FY 2022 data is on the Office of Acquisition Management homepage at the following link:                         *https://www.commerce.gov/​oam/​resources/​service-contract-inventory.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         Questions regarding the service contract inventory should be directed to Virna Winters, Executive Director, Acquisition Policy, Oversight and Workforce at 202-482-4248 or                         *vwinters@doc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The service contract inventory provides information on service contract actions over $150,000 made in FY 2021. The information is organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed throughout the agency. The inventory has been developed in accordance with guidance on service contract inventories issued on November 5, 2010, by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) and FAR 4.17.

Olivia J. Bradley,

Senior Procurement Executive and Director for Acquisition Management.

[FR Doc. 2024-00889 Filed 1-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Registered Office.
 Other Offices.
   Time and Place of Meetings
 Annual Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Notice




---



##### 



Quorum
 Voting
 Method of Voting
 Action Without Meeting
 2




---



##### 



Responsibilities.
 Number; Term
 Vacancies; Increases
 Place of meetings
 3




---



##### 



Regular Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Quorum; Majority Vote
 Minutes.
 Committees
 Committee Minutes
 Action Without Meeting
 4




---



##### 



Method
 Waiver.
   Number
 5




---



##### 



Appointed Officers
 Removal
 Compensation
 Duties
       6




---



##### 



Checks
 Fiscal Year
 Telephone and Similar Meetings
 Distributions and Share Dividends
 Amendment of Bylaws
 7
Exhibit 99.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

# SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Emmis Communications
Corporation (the Company), that, to his knowledge:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31,
          2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: July 15, 2003

| | /s/ WALTER Z. BERGER
Walter Z. Berger
Executive Vice President, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

                           ARM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
                            515 WEST MARKET STREET
                          LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY 40202

                                                              March 20, 1998

Mr. John R. Lindholm
ARM Financial Group, Inc.
515 West Market Street
Louisville, Kentucky 40202

Dear John:

     This letter amendment (this "AMENDMENT") sets forth our mutual
understanding concerning an amendment to your Employment Agreement with
ARM Financial Group, Inc. (the "COMPANY") dated as of July 1, 1996, as
amended December 4, 1997 (the "EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT").

          1.  Section 5.1.1 is hereby amended by deleting the words "the
     penultimate sentence of this Section 5.1.1 and" in the first line of
     Section 5.1.1.

          2.  Section 5.1.1 is hereby further amended by deleting the
     penultimate sentence in such Section 5.1.1.

          3.  This Amendment shall be governed in accordance with the laws of
     the State of New York.

          4.  Except as modified hereby, the Employment Agreement remains in
     full force and effect.


<PAGE>



                                      2

     Please evidence your agreement with this Amendment by executing the
acknowledgment set forth below.

                                                  ARM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

                                                  /s/ Martin H. Ruby
                                                  -------------------------
                                                  Name:
                                                  Title:

ACKNOWLEDGED AND
AGREED AS OF THE DATE
FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN

 /s/ John R. Lindholm
---------------------
     John R. Lindholm
Exhibit
32.2








Certification
of President and Co Chief Executive Officer








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)







In
connection with the Annual Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








Date:  March
17, 2008







/s/ Peter Hoetzinger


Peter
Hoetzinger


President
and Co Chief Executive Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 15, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00592

- CV

NORTH EAST INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT and Texas Commissioner of

Education

, Appellant s

v.

Dehann RIOU,

Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CI09958

The Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The a ppellee ’ s unopposed motion for access to sealed records is granted.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of February, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Hybrid  Technologies,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Holly
Roseberry,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge:  (1) The Report fully  complies
with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

                                       /s/ Holly Roseberry
                                       ---------------------
                                       Holly Roseberry
                                       Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                       Financial Officer

June 14, 2006
<PAGE>

                     32.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund IV,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kimberly A. Springsteen, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Kimberly A. Springsteen
---------------------------
Kimberly A. Springsteen
Principal Financial Officer
August 13, 2004
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 20 October 2006         

amending Decision 92/452/EEC as regards certain embryo collection and production teams in the United States of America

(notified under document number C(2006) 4907)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/706/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 89/556/EEC of 25 September 1989 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in and importation from third countries of embryos of domestic animals of the bovine species (1), and in particular Article 8(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 92/452/EEC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 October 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 302, 19.10.1989, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Commission Decision 2006/60/EC (OJ L 31, 3.2.2006, p. 24).

(2)OJ L 250, 29.8.1992, p. 40. Decision as last amended by Decision 2006/614/EC (OJ L 252, 15.9.2006, p. 25).

----

ANNEX

The Annex to Decision 92/452/EEC is amended as follows:

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF MAX CAPITAL GROUP LTD.**

This certification isprovided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 of Max Capital Group Ltd. (the“Issuer”). 

I, W. Marston Becker, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that: 

(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Issuer. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

Dated: May 8, 2007 

 

 

42
1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , No. 17

- 30187

Plaintiff

- Appell ee , D.C. No. CR 16

- 14

- H

- CCL
v.
DOMINICK JAMES HOWARD , MEMORANDUM *

Defendant

- Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Charles C. Lovell , District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 8 , 2019 ** Seattle, Washington
Before: IKUTA and CHRISTEN , Circuit Judges, and FREUDENTHAL , *** District Judge

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Nancy D. Freudenthal, United States District Judge for the District of Wyoming, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

FEB 13 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

Defendant Dominick James Howard appeals his 120

- month sentence following his guilty plea for one count of possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B)

. We have juri sd iction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm

. On appeal, Howar d challenges the district court’s finding that Mont. Code Ann. § 45

- 5

- 502 subjected him to the mandatory minimum penalty of ten years pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(b)(2)

. We review de novo whether prior convictions support statutory mandatory

- minimum enhancements. United States v.
Sullivan , 797 F.3d 623, 635 (9th Cir. 2015) ( citation omitted ). The district court
did not err in applying the sentencing enhancement. United S tates v. Sinerius , 504
F.3d 737 , 741

- 42 (9th Cir. 2007) (finding Mont. Code Ann. § 45

- 5

- 502 qualified as a prior conviction for sexual abus e)

. Howard claims Sinerius should be reconsidered, but this panel has no power to overrule circuit precedent

. Miller v. Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 900 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (holding that circuit precedent may be overturned only en banc, subject to exceptions not applicable here).
The district court did not err in altering its oral pronouncement at sentencing by imp osing restitution in the written judgment. “ [W] ithin 14 days after sentencing, the court may correct a sentence that resulted from

. . . clear error.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). Howard’s restitution was mandatory. 1 8 U.S.C. §3

2259(b)(4). The district court was authorized to correct the clear error in its oral
pronouncement.
AFFIRMED
.
##### 



Exhibit 10.3
 
  
 
 Grant of Restricted Stock
 Restrictions
 No Shareholder Rights
 Vesting Exhibit
A Exhibit A
 Securities Law Restrictions




---



##### 



Stock Power
 Additional Restrictions
 Custody of Certificates
 Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement
   2




---



##### 



Agreement to Terms of the Plan and Agreement
 Fractional Shares
 Change in Capital Structure
 Notice
 If to the Company:
    
    ARRIS Group, Inc.3871 Lakefield DriveSuwanee, Georgia 30024Attn: Larry Margolis, Executive Vice PresidentIf to the Participant:
 No Right to Continued Employment
 Impact on Other Plans and Arrangements
 Binding Effect
 Conflicts
 Governing Law
 3




---



##### 



Tax Consequences and Section 409A
 Withholding Obligations
 Amendment or Termination
 Definitions
 Affiliate ,
 Code
 Competing Business
 Disabled
  COMPANY:ARRIS GROUP, INC.By:Name:Title:PARTICIPANT:Participant
 4




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A  Vesting Provisions
 Exhibit A
 I. General Vesting
 Service-Based Vesting
 [thirty-three] [33] [first and second] [thirty-four] [34] [third]
 Performance and Service-Based Vesting
  Percentage of Shares
    
    CumulativeVesting Date
    
    Performance Target
    
    Vested
    
    Performance Target
 II. Accelerated Vesting
 Accelerated Vesting on Death
  Accelerated Vesting on Disability
  5




---



##### 



Accelerated Vesting On Retirement
  6
September 14, 2016

 Exemption No. 11062C

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0352

Mr. Daniel Tartre

Astraeus Aerial Cinema Systems

16255 Ventura Blvd., Suite 625 

Encino, CA 91436 

Dear Mr. Tartre:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 

11062B. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions and 

limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated August 15, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Astraeus Aerial Cinema Systems (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an 

extension to your current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) 

and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform closed-set motion 

picture and television filming1

. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner.

1 You also requested to increase the maximum payload of the V.3CS multirotor UAS to 80 (eighty) pounds, and 

to allow UAS operations using augmented visual line of sight. At this time, the FAA is unable to authorize the 

increased payload for the V.3CS multirotor UAS and UAS operations using augmented visual line of sight until a 

further assessment is completed. When the FAA completes its review, we will proceed accordingly and no 

further action will be required by the petitioner. 

 
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 11062,

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113 and 44701, delegated to me by the 

Administrator, the operator is granted an extension to its exemption. 

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 11062 remain in effect. The 

termination date has been updated. 

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

This exemption terminates on September 30, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
Specifications Avery International Super X- X4/X8 Multirotor Platforms

Super X Multirotor Aircraft SpecificationsThe Patriot X4 and X8 is the most versatile heavy lift multicopter on the planet wi th fixed

hinge mounted booms with threaded fasteners this frame minimizes vibration by 60%

even in temperatures below -10F and upwards of 120F. The ease of taking a large

multicopter and transporting can not be any easier.



### Frame FoldedFrame Extended

Side ProfileThis frame is designed to be used and configured in either and X4 Quad Configuration

and or OctoX8 configuration. It is also been tested with ALL flight controllers c urrently

on the market our primary flight controllers are the DJI A2 Professional, PiX Hawk, DJI

Naza V2, UTC Piccolo Multirotor. This airframe is also designed to carry a nd integrated

parachute deployment system incase of a failsafe condition. Designed in Ame rica this is

one of the premier multirotors of 2015.Radio Specifications

### Attaching the Mooring System

1. The VikingUAS Mooring tether line needs to be fastened as close to the center of

the aerial vehicles CG in order to keep the line from making contact with the

propellers of the multi-rotor if using a balloon place as close to the center at the

bottom of the balloon or blimp.

2. If you do not have pre-drilled 1/8” hole in your aircraft you will need to drill one

for the 4-40 screw attachment to anchor the aluminum stand-off.

3. Once tether is attached and line is spooled out we recommend you to practice at

low level to get a feel for the tether on your aircraft. Each platform reacts

differently with the line which can easily be dialed in through the gains in yo ur

flight control software you can do this manually through the Skylark Radio follow

the instructions on sub-trim adjustment. The key is that your’re comfortable with

the flight characteristics to safely operate the platform. If at any t ime you do not

feel comfortable disconnect tether and seize flight operations immediate ly.

4. Operation above 149 feet AGL must comply with CFR 14 Part 101.13 (a) (1) (3) (4) and

(b) Part 101

. 17 (a) & (b).

5. Operation will be conducted with a minimum 150 foot Safety Perimeter where

nonparticipating personnel and property will not be allowed in t o the operational area.