alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COOPER INDUSTRIES, LTD.
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
    
    
    Year Ended December 31,2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Interest Expense
    
    $
    50,500
    
    
    $
    38,100
    
    
    $
    51,000
    
    
    $
    51,500
    
    
    $
    64,800
    
    
    $
    68,100
    
    
    $
    74,100Estimated Interest Portion of
Rent Expense
    
    
    11,230
    
    
    
    8,944
    
    
    
    12,132
    
    
    
    10,168
    
    
    
    10,583
    
    
    
    11,666
    
    
    
    12,183Fixed Charges
    
    $
    61,730
    
    
    $
    47,044
    
    
    $
    63,132
    
    
    $
    61,668
    
    
    $
    75,383
    
    
    $
    79,766
    
    
    $
    86,283Income From Continuing
Operations Before Income Taxes
    
    $
    668,200
    
    
    $
    608,900
    
    
    $
    826,200
    
    
    $
    647,700
    
    
    $
    495,000
    
    
    $
    428,500
    
    
    $
    346,500Add: Fixed Charges
    
    
    61,730
    
    
    
    47,044
    
    
    
    63,132
    
    
    
    61,668
    
    
    
    75,383
    
    
    
    79,766
    
    
    
    86,283Less: Equity in (Earnings)/Losses
of
Less Than 50% Owned Companies
    
    
    2,825
    
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    (265
    )
    
    
    (724
    )
    
    
    (1,328
    )
    
    
    (2,903
    )
    
    
    (2,534
    )Earnings Before Fixed Charges
    
    $
    732,755
    
    
    $
    655,947
    
    
    $
    889,067
    
    
    $
    708,644
    
    
    $
    569,055
    
    
    $
    505,363
    
    
    $
    430,249Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    11.9
    x
    
    
    13.9
    x
    
    
    14.1
    x
    
    
    11.5
    x
    
    
    7.5
    x
    
    
    6.3
    x
    
    
    5.0
    x
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF MAX RE CAPITAL LTD.**

 

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies thequarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 of Max Re Capital Ltd. (the “Issuer”). 

 

I, Robert J. Cooney, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that: 

 

(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 

 

(ii) the information contained in theForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest. 

 

Dated: October 31, 2005
**Exhibit32.2**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with thisAnnual Report of UnionBanCal Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, David I. Matson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

(1)                 The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                 The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: March 1, 2007 |     |                       |
|---------------------|----------|----------------------------|
|                |     |                       |
| By:                 |     | /s/ DAVID I.  MATSON       |
|                |     | David I. Matson            |
|                | * * | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IVI Communications, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date: February 14, 2005                    /s/ Nyhl Henson
                                           -------------------------
                                           Nyhl Henson, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.2







[ENERSYS LETTERHEAD]






 



 










JOHN D. CRAIG 



Chairman, President & CEO






 






 



 







	


April 13, 2005











 



Mr. Michael T. Philion



529 Briarwood Drive



Elverson PA  19607







Dear Mike:






With reference to your employment agreement (the "Employment Agreement") with EnerSys Delaware Inc., f/k/a Yuasa, Inc., (the "Company"), dated November 9, 2000, pursuant to which you are currently employed as Executive Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, we confirm that your salary as set forth in Section 3 of the Employment Agreement is increased to $344,000.00, effective as of April 1, 2005.






Except as expressly set forth in the letter, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.






	


ENERSYS DELAWARE INC.







 

	


By:
	


/s/ John D. Craig
	

	 	


John D. Craig



Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
# Socieoeconomic Analysis - Appalachian Regional Commission

- ARC Releases New Data Revealing Appalachia’s Economic Improvements, Key Vulnerabilities Compared to the Rest of the U.S. Economy Region sees increased income, reduced poverty rates, and boosts in educational attainment and broadband access, but still lags behind both the U.S. and non-Appalachian rural areas.&#160;&#160; WASHINGTON, DC, June 26, 2024—New data released today by the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) in the 14th annual update of The Appalachian Region: A Data Overview from the 2018-2022 [&#8230;]The post ARC Releases New Data Revealing Appalachia’s Economic Improvements, Key Vulnerabilities Compared to the Rest of the U.S. Economy appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- ARC Releases New Data Showing Improving Trends and Economic Vulnerabilities Prior to COVID-19 &#8220;The Chartbook” features more than 300,000 data points on Appalachia’s economy, income, employment, education, and other indicators to serve as future baseline for COVID-19 analysis. WASHINGTON, D.C., June 10, 2021—Data from the 11th annual update of The Appalachian Region: A Data Overview from the 2015–2019 American Community Survey, released today, indicate that Appalachia was improving [&#8230;]The post ARC Releases New Data Showing Improving Trends and Economic Vulnerabilities Prior to COVID-19 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Research Finds That Appalachia’s Diseases of Despair Mortality Rates Continue at Disproportionately Higher Rates in Comparison to Rest of Nation For Women, Disease of Despair Mortality&#160;Rates&#160; in&#160;Appalachia&#160; Over 45 Percent Higher Than Rest of Country&#160; Washington, D.C., November, 19, 2020 &#8212;  Appalachian Diseases of Despair, a new report from the Appalachian Regional Commission finds that despite overall declining mortality rates from diseases of despair (overdose, suicide, and liver disease) between 2017-2018, the Region’s diseases of despair mortality [&#8230;]The post Research Finds That Appalachia’s Diseases of Despair Mortality Rates Continue at Disproportionately Higher Rates in Comparison to Rest of Nation appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- ARC Releases The Appalachian Region: A Data Overview from 2013–2017 ARC released The Appalachian Region: A Data Overview from the 2013–2017 American Community Survey, also known as "The Chartbook." Drawing from the American Community Survey and comparable Census Population Estimates, the report contains over 300,000 data points about Appalachia’s demographics, income, employment, as well as education, computer access, housing, and transportation and other indicators—all presented at the regional, subregional, state, and county level with comparisons to the rest of the nation. The Chartbook also examines data change over recent years to show trends.The post ARC Releases The Appalachian Region: A Data Overview from 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          184497
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    60034
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                245531
<PP&E>                                         9470823
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2100693
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7741938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4672
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     7159756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7741938
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                733469
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   338967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 394502
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             394502
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    394502
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     8.22
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-65-2023]

      ( print page 90164)    
Grand Design RV, LLC submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board (the Board) for its facilities in Middlebury, Indiana, within FTZ 125. The notification conforming to the requirements of the Board's regulations (15 CFR 400.22) was received on December 19, 2023.

                    Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ production activity would be limited to the specific foreign-status materials/components and specific finished product described in the submitted notification (summarized below) and subsequently authorized by the Board. The benefits that may stem from conducting production activity under FTZ procedures are explained in the background section of the Board's website—accessible via                     *www.trade.gov/​ftz.*

The proposed finished product is diesel motorhomes (duty rate is 2.5%).

The proposed foreign-status materials and components are cab chassis and van chassis (duty rate ranges from 4.0% to 25.0%). The request indicates that certain materials/components are subject to duties under section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (section 301), depending on the country of origin. The applicable section 301 decisions require subject merchandise to be admitted to FTZs in privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41).

                    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary and sent to:                     *ftz@trade.gov.*                     The closing period for their receipt is February 7, 2024.                

A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection in the “Online FTZ Information System” section of the Board's website.

                    For further information, contact Juanita Chen at                     *juanita.chen@trade.gov.*

Dated: December 22, 2023.

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-28779 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Herman Jessie CAROTHERS, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12320.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

June 27, 1956.

Hughes & Hughes, Hobart, for plaintiff in error.

. Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Lewis A. Wallace, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

*547BRETT, Judge.

Plaintiff in error, Herman Jessie Caroth-ers, defendant below, was charged by information in the County Court of Tillman County, Oklahoma, with the offense of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, the offense allegedly being committed in the said county and state on the twenty-third day of October, 1955. He was tried by a jury, convicted, his punishment fixed at a fine of $1 and thirty days in the county jail. Judgment and sentence were entered accordingly from which this appeal has been perfected.

The defendant presents but two propositions. The first is that the trial court permitted the defendant to be interrogated on cross-examination relative to former convictions in the police court for. being drunk and reckless driving on prior occasions. This contention has been adversely decided to the defendant on a number of occasions among them being Wheatley v. State, 77 Okl.Cr. 122, 139 P.2d 809, wherein it was held:

> “County attorney may not inquire of defendant on cross-examination as to petty convictions in municipal court where the same do not constitute offenses under the state law.

> “County attorney may inquire of defendant on cross-examination, for the purpose of affecting his credibility, as to his convictions in police court for violation of municipal ordinances prohibiting the possession or sale of intoxicating liquors as the same constitute offenses under the state law and are crimes within contemplation of statute. 12 O.S.1941 § 381.”

Chambless v. State, 90 Okl.Cr. 423, 214 P.2d 947; Farley v. State, 93 Okl.Cr. 192, 226 P.2d 1002; Hathcox v. State, 94 Okl.Cr. 110, 230 P.2d 927.

.Next, the defendant contends that the ocurt made improper remarks to the jury amounting to-a comment on the evidence. An examination of the record discloses that this contention is without substantial merit. But, in any event, the record discloses that no objection was interposed and no exception saved to the remarks by the court and that the question is raised on appeal for the first time. Such objection to alleged error must be made in sufficient, time to permit the trial court to rule thereon before action is taken and before the trial is ended. Johnson v. State, 1 Okl.Cr. 321, 97 P. 1059. Witzel v. State, 89 Okl.Cr. 142, 205 P.2d 1173, holds:

> “Alleged errors occurring during the progress of a trial, and not properly raised and presented in the court below, will not be considered on appeal.”

The appellate court in criminal cases cannot consider questions that were not raised in the trial court as authorized by statute, 22 O.S.1951 § 512, unless the errors assigned raise a jurisdictional question. Jennings v. State, 92 Okl.Cr. 347, 223 P.2d 562. The error complained of is not jurisdictional.

The judgment and sentence is accordingly affirmed.

POWELL, J., concurs.
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5044 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the treatment of certain surviving spouses under the contracting 

goals and preferences of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5044 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Service-Disabled Vet3 erans Small Business Continuation Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT REGARDING TREATMENT 

5 OF CERTAIN SURVIVING SPOUSES UNDER 

6 CONTRACTING GOALS AND PREFERENCES OF 

7 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

8 Effective on the date specified in subsection (e) of 

9 section 1832 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

10 for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 

11 2660), section 8127(k)(3) of title 38, United States Code, 

12 as amended by such section 1832, is further amended by 

13 inserting after the period at the end the following new sen14 tence: ‘‘A surviving spouse of such a veteran who is not 

15 covered by subparagraph (C)(i) of such section by reason 

16 of the disability rating of the veteran being less than 100 

17 percent shall be treated as being so covered during the 

18 period beginning on the date of the death of the veteran 

19 and ending on the date that is 3 years after such death, 

20 the date on which the surviving spouse remarries, or the 

21 date on which the surviving spouse relinquishes an owner-
3 

•HR 5044 EH

1 ship interest in the small business concern, whichever oc2 curs first.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5044 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify 

partment of Veterans Affairs. the contracting goals and preferences of the Dethe treatment of certain surviving spouses under
EXHIBIT 10.13

UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION  PERFORMANCE SHARE AGREEMENT

This Agreement is made as of January 1, 2008, (the "Award Date"), between UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION (the "Company" or "UNBC") and
 ("Participant").

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS,
the Company has adopted the 1997 UnionBanCal Corporation Performance Share Plan, as amended and restated (the "Plan") authorizing the grant of Target Awards of Performance
Shares to eligible individuals in connection with the performance of services for the Company and its Subsidiaries (as defined in the Plan). The Plan, including the definition of terms, is
incorporated in this Agreement by reference and made a part of it. In the event of any conflict among the provisions of the Plan document and this Agreement, the Plan document shall prevail; and

WHEREAS,
the Company regards Participant as a valuable contributor to the Company, and has determined that it would be to the advantage and interest of the Company and its shareholders
to grant to Participant the Target Award of Performance Shares provided for in this Agreement, subject to performance against certain criteria, as an inducement to remain in the service of the company
and as an incentive for increased efforts during such service;

NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, and the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties to this Agreement hereby agree as follows:

UNBC %ile
Ranking vs. Peer
Banks

Multiple of
Target Award
Earned3 75th %ile

2X50th %ile

1X25th %ile

.25X< 25th %ile

0X




1

---



2

---





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Performance Share Agreement as of the date first above written. The Participant also hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy
of the 1997 UnionBanCal Corporation Performance Share Plan, as amended and restated.

|UnionBanCal Corporation |                                       | 
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------- | 
|By                      | Paul Fearer, Executive Vice President | 
|                        |                                       | 
|                        |                                       | 
|                        |                                       | 

3

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 99.1
 
 
 For Immediate Release
    
    Contact:Thomas A. Pitler
Neurogen Corp.
203-315-3046tpitler@nrgn.com
 NEUROGEN CORPORATION RECEIVES NOTIFICATION FROM NASDAQ
 Branford, CT, August 27, 2008 
 ,
  About Neurogen
 Safe Harbor Statement  This press release contains forward-looking statements that are subject to the safe harbors created
under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking
statements include statements that refer to the Companys intentions to take actions required to
regain compliance with the listing standards of The Nasdaq Global Market, the form, timing and
effect of any such actions, and the Companys ability to regain compliance. Readers are cautioned
that actual events that occur could differ materially from those expressed in or contemplated by
the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual events to differ include, but are
not limited to, events and developments affecting the Companys per share stock price that may
affect its ability to achieve the minimum bid price requirement, the Companys ability to regain
compliance with the minimum bid price listing requirement, the Companys ability to continue to
meet the other Nasdaq listing requirements, which could result in the delisting of the Companys
common stock even if it achieved compliance with the minimum bid price requirement, the Companys
ability to successfully appeal a delisting determination by Nasdaq, and the Companys ability to
transfer its listing to The Nasdaq Capital Market. In addition, please refer to the risk factors
contained in the Companys SEC filings available at www.sec.gov, including without limitation, the
Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and Neurogens quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. Readers are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made.
Neurogen undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements for any
reason.
 ###