alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1552 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1552

 To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to prevent the canceling 
of annuities to certain divorced spouses of workers whose widows elect 
                     to receive lump sum payments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 1996

  Mr. Daschle introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to prevent the canceling 
of annuities to certain divorced spouses of workers whose widows elect 
                     to receive lump sum payments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Railroad Retirement Amendment Act of 
1996''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF DIVORCED SPOUSES.

    (a) In General.--Section 6(c) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 
1974 is amended--
            (1) in the last sentence of paragraph (1), by inserting 
        ``(other than to a survivor in the circumstances described in 
        paragraph (3))'' after ``no further benefits shall be paid''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Notwithstanding the last sentence of paragraph (1), 
        benefits shall be paid to a survivor who--
                    ``(A) is a divorced wife; and
                    ``(B) through administrative error received 
                benefits otherwise precluded by the making of a lump 
                sum payment under this section to a widow;
        if that divorced wife makes an election to repay to the Board 
        the lump sum payment. The Board may withhold up to 10 percent 
        of each benefit amount paid after the date of the enactment of 
        this paragraph toward such reimbursement. The Board may waive 
        such repayment to the extent the Board determines it would 
        cause an unjust financial hardship for the beneficiary.''.
    (b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by this section 
shall apply with respect to any benefits paid before the date of 
enactment of this Act as well as to benefits payable on or after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                                                                      Exhibit 27

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        $  5,811
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,110
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,819
<PP&E>                                         129,289
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,401
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 217,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,459
<BONDS>                                        126,216
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           226
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   217,742
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,602
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               143,860
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,062
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11,942)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,149)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,793)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,598
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,195)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.36)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000910675
<NAME> COMMERCIAL ASSETS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            4664
<SECURITIES>                                     12502
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 19213
<PP&E>                                           65602
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1329)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1945
<BONDS>                                          20442
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           104
<OTHER-SE>                                       73977
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     97083
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  6599
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1682
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2524
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2524
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2524
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MeriStar
Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P., MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp.,
MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. II and MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp.
III (the Issuers) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we,
Paul W. Whetsell, Chief Executive Officer, and Donald D. Olinger, Chief
Financial Officer, of the Issuers, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m
or 78o(d)); and      
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuers.

Date:      August
12, 2003



| |  | /s/  PAUL W. WHETSELL
Chief Executive Officer
      MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P.
      MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp.
      MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. II
      MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. III
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | /s/  DONALD D. OLINGER
Donald D. Olinger 
      Chief Financial Officer
      MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P.
      MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp.
      MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. II
      MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. III
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

33
1

The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern

District of Iowa. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1780

___________

Allen Huenefeld, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Northern

v. * District of Iowa.

*

Michael Carr; Bill Elam, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: September 20, 2010

Filed: October 5, 2010

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Iowa inmate Allen Huenefeld appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of

summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having conducted careful de novo

review of the record, see Mack v. Dillon, 594 F.3d 620, 622 (8th Cir. 2010) (per

curiam) (standard of review), we agree with the district court that summary judgment

was warranted. Further, Huenefeld did not make the required showing below that

summary judgment was premature; and his complaints on appeal regarding the
-2-

effectiveness of his appointed counsel are not a basis for reversal, see Taylor v.

Dickel, 293 F.3d 427, 431 (8th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

______________________________
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-113642, 333-62733 and 333-50910) and on Forms S-3 (File
Nos. 333-109391, 333-65536, 333-74172 and 333-96939) of LifePoint, Inc. and in
the related Prospectus of our report dated June 27, 2003, with respect to the
financial statements of LifePoint, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2004.


                                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                       ---------------------

Orange County, California
June 24, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1514 Referred in House (RFH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1514

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 4, 1996

             Referred to the Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the obligation and expenditure of appropriated funds for a 
 2.4 percent increase in pay and allowances and a 5.2 percent increase 
   for basic allowance for quarters for the members of the uniformed 
                               services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That notwithstanding the Executive order of the President, or any other 
provision of law, funds appropriated by Public Law 104-61 for purposes 
set forth in section 601 of H.R. 1530, the Conference Report 
accompanying the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
1996, House Report No. 104-406, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First 
Session, as passed by the House of Representatives on December 15, 1995 
and by the Senate on December 19, 1995, may be obligated and expended 
for such purposes in accordance with such section: Provided, That 
authorities provided under this section shall expire on April 2, 1996.

            Passed the Senate December 30, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
August14,2012TheHonorableJaredBlumenfeldRegionalAdministratorU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyRE:EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0021,FRICc:RepresentativePaulGosarArizonaCongressionalDistrict1DearMr.Blumenfeld:TheproposedrulingrelatedtoRegionalHazewilldevastateourregion.NavajoandApachecountiesaretwoofthepoorestcountiesintheUnitedStates,andtheChollaandCoronadopowerplantsofferourcitizenssomeofthebest-payingjobsinthisregion.Ourschools,ourinfrastructure,andamyriadofsmallbusinessesbenefitfromthepresenceofthesefacilitiesinourregion.Bothplantshaveinvestedmillionsintechnologytoscrubtheiremissionsandcomplywithstateandfederalregulatoryrequirements.ThesecostshavebeenpassedontocustomersintheregionandacrosstheSouthwest.Nowyouragencyisproposingtoimposemuchmorestringentstandardsinashorterperiodthanoriginallyplannedfor.Itisdifficulttoconveywhatthehumancostofyouragency’sactionsisboundtobe.Skyrocketingelectricalpowerrates,depopulationofourregion,shrinkingopportunities,andeconomicmiserywillresult.Iurgeyoutotakeintoconsiderationthatanadmirableresult—pristinevistasinnationalparks—willonlybeminimallyimprovedbyshuttingdownourcoal-firedpowerplants.Buttheconsequencesofthisproposalwillcausemuchsufferinginaregionwhichisalreadydisadvantaged.Sincerely,AnnHilliard8245WindwardDriveShowLow,AZ85901928-812-0977
May 2, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOSE ANGEL MORENO , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00807

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , and that this decision be certified below for observance.
Deny Writ and Opinion Filed September 18, 2013 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01184-CV 

IN RE JAMES M. FISHER II, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 255th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-09-22733 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Myers 

Opinion by Justice FitzGerald 

Relator contends the trial judge erred in awarding real party in interest interim attorney’s 

fees. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. 

Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief 

requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) 

(orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator=s petition for writ of mandamus and LIFT

the stay imposed by our order of August 29, 2013. 

131184F.P05 

KERRY P. FITZGERALD 

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF MAX RE CAPITAL LTD.**

 

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies thequarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 of Max Re Capital Ltd. (the “Issuer”). 

 

I, Robert J. Cooney, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that: 

 

(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or78o(d)); and 

 

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version ofthis written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

Dated: August 1, 2005
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Gary S. Jacob, certify that:

1)    I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

2)    Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3)    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4)    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



5)    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);



Date: August 14, 2009

/s/ GARY S. JACOB Gary S. Jacob Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 28, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1180

Lower Tribunal No. 19-31079

________________

Grand Bay Residences Condominium Association, Inc., etc., et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

Key Bay Club, LLLP, etc., et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade 

County, Reemberto Diaz, Judge.

Rasco, Klock, Perez & Nieto, P.L., and Ramon E. Rasco and Juan 

Carlos Antorcha and Paul C. Savage, for appellants.

Shubin & Bass, P.A., and John K. Shubin and Juan J. Farach and 

Alannah L. Shubrick, for appellee Key Bay Club, LLLP.

Before SCALES, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 24.2

UnionBanCal Corporation
March 3, 2009


WHEREAS,officers of UnionBanCal Corporation (the "Corporation") have made presentations to the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors regarding the
Corporation's financial results for the year ended December 31, 2008; and

WHEREAS,the Audit Committee has had an opportunity to review and comment on such results; and

WHEREAS, based on the Audit Committee's discussion with management and the independent auditors and the Audit Committee's review of the representation
of management and the report of the independent auditors to the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee recommended that the Board of Directors include the audited consolidated financial statements in
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEDthat the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission;

FURTHER RESOLVEDthat the President and Chief Executive Officer, the Vice Chairmen and such other officers of the Corporation as they shall designate in
writing, be, and they hereby are, authorized and empowered on behalf of the Corporation to execute the Form 10-K, in substantially the form submitted to the Board, and file it with
the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and with such other governmental agencies or instrumentalities as such officers deem necessary or
desirable, and to prepare, execute, deliver and file any amendment or amendments to the Form 10-K, as they may deem necessary or appropriate, provided, however, that prior to
filing, all proposed significant changes to the draft Form 10-K, which was presented to the Board, shall be reviewed with the Chair of the Audit Committee, who shall determine if
the substantive nature of the changes warrant further discussion with the full Audit Committee; and

FURTHER RESOLVEDthat David I. Matson, David A. Anderson and Morris W. Hirsch, be, and each of them with full power to act without the other hereby is,
authorized and empowered to prepare, execute, deliver and file the Form 10-K and any amendment or amendments thereto on behalf of and as attorneys for the Corporation and on behalf
of and as attorneys for any of the following: the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer, the principal accounting officer, and any other officer of the Corporation.

I certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Board of Directors of UnionBanCal Corporation at a Meeting of said Board held on March 3, 2009.

I
further certify that the foregoing resolution now stands on the records of the books of the Corporation and has not been modified, repealed or set aside in any manner whatsoever and is
now in full force and effect.

Dated:
March 3, 2009

/s/ MORRIS W. HIRSCH Morris W. Hirsch Secretary


---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-41110

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DIOGENES ASCENCIO-LEMUS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:10-CR-426-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Diogenes AscencioLemus has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ascencio-Lemus has not filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 16, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-41110 Document: 00511573857 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2011
No. 10-41110

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-41110 Document: 00511573857 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2011