alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5116 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5116

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the jurisdiction 
 of courts of the United States and of the States over certain foreign 
                   entities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2018

 Mr. Conaway introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the jurisdiction 
 of courts of the United States and of the States over certain foreign 
                   entities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping Foreign Businesses 
Sanctuary Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. JURISDICTION OVER CERTAIN FOREIGN ENTITIES.

    Section 1605 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an entity is not 
immune from the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States or of 
the States if the entity--
            ``(1) is incorporated in a foreign state in which state-
        owned or state-controlled entities commonly engage in 
        commercial activity; and
            ``(2) conducts commercial activity in the United States.''.

SEC. 3. COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY OF AFFILIATE ENTITIES.

    Section 1603(d) of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``A''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) For purposes of this chapter, a commercial activity 
        of an agency or instrumentality of a foreign state, or of an 
        entity described in section 1605(e), shall be attributable to 
        any corporate affiliate of the agency, instrumentality, or 
        entity that--
                    ``(A) directly or indirectly owns a majority of 
                shares of the agency, instrumentality, or entity; and
                    ``(B) is also an agency or instrumentality of a 
                foreign state, or an entity described in section 
                1605(e).''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 4.8

()

November 11, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:      MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P.            Commission
File No. 333-63768

Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Item 601 (b) (4) (iii) of Regulation S-K
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P. (the
Company) hereby agrees to furnish copies of certain
long-term debt instruments to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon the request of the Commission, and, in
accordance with such regulation, such instruments are not
being filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003.

Very truly yours,

MERISTAR HOSPITALITY OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

By:
    
    MERISTAR HOSPITALITY CORPORATION,
Its General PartnerBy:
    
    /s/Jerome J. KraisingerJerome J. Kraisinger
Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel






---

MeriStar Hospitality
Corporation4501 North Fairfax Drive Suite
500  Arlington, VA 22203  703/812-7200  Fax 703/812-7255
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 13 (Friday, January 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 3711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00971]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing a removal of an aircraft currently 
included on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons 
List (SDN List).

DATES: See Supplementary Information section for applicable date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Bradley T. Smith, Director, 
tel.: 202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-
622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; 
Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or the 
Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-
622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available on OFAC's website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Action(s)

    A. On January 8, 2024, OFAC removed from the SDN List the aircraft 
listed below, which was subject to prohibitions imposed pursuant to 
Executive Order 14024 of April 15, 2021, ``Blocking Property With 
Respect To Specified Harmful Foreign Activities of the Government of 
the Russian Federation,'' 86 FR 20249, 3 CFR, 2021 Comp., p. 542 (Apr. 
15, 2021) (E.O. 14024).
    1. 9H-OKO; Aircraft Manufacture Date 2018; Aircraft Model G650; 
Aircraft Manufacturer's Serial Number (MSN) 6356; Aircraft Tail Number 
9H-OKO (aircraft) [RUSSIA-EO14024] (Linked To: EMPEROR AVIATION LTD).

    Dated: January 12, 2024.
Bradley T. Smith,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the 
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2024-00971 Filed 1-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 15

To provide that professional baseball teams and leagues composed of such

teams shall be subject to the antitrust laws.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. MOYNIHAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide that professional baseball teams and leagues composed of such teams shall be subject to the antitrust

laws.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Pastime Pres5 ervation Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress finds that—

8 (1) the business of organized professional base9 ball is in, or affects, interstate commerce; and
2

•S 15 IS

1 (2) the antitrust laws should be amended to re2 verse the result of the decisions of the Supreme

3 Court of the United States in Federal Baseball Club

4 of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Profes5 sional Baseball Clubs, 259 U.S. 200 (1922), Toolson

6 v. New York Yankees, Inc., 346 U.S. 356 (1953),

7 and Flood v. Kuhn, 407 U.S. 258 (1972), which ex8 empted baseball from coverage under the antitrust

9 laws.

10 SEC. 3. APPLICATION OF ANTITRUST LAWS TO PROFES11 SIONAL BASEBALL.

12 The Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.) is amended

13 by adding at the end the following new section:

14 ‘‘SEC. 27. (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in

15 Public Law 87–331 (15 U.S.C. 291 et seq.) (commonly

16 known as the ‘Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961’), the

17 antitrust laws shall apply to the business of organized pro18 fessional baseball.

19 ‘‘(b) APPLICATION OF SECTION.—This section—

20 (1) shall apply to any agreement that is in ef21 fect on or after the date of enactment of this section

22 and to conduct engaged in after that date in further23 ance of that agreement or in furtherance of any

24 other object; but
3

•S 15 IS

1 (2) shall not apply to conduct engaged in before

2 that date.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 23.1




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
-----------------------------


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-85380,  33-88010, 33-90240 of Wickes Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our
report dated March 27, 2003, except for Note 10 as to which the date is April 4,
2003,  and Notes 2, 20 and 21, as to which the date is November  17, 2003 (which
report  expresses  an  unqualified   opinion  and  includes  three   explanatory
paragraphs  relating to: the Company's  adoption of new  Statements of Financial
Accounting Standards;  the Company's ability to continue as a going concern; and
the restatement of the consolidated  financial  statements for each of the three
years in the period ended December 28, 2002),  appearing in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A of Wickes Inc.  and  subsidiaries  for the year ended  December  28,
2002.



Chicago, Illinois
November 17, 2003
Exhibit 32.1





GLOBAL
DIGITAL SOLUTIONS, INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Global Digital
Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the
date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.
 The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
 The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





By:
 /s/ William Delgado


William
Delgado


Principal Executive
Officer


Date:
June 18, 2019
#### TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC., an Iowa Corporation; United States Cellular Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Appellants, v. AMCELL F ATLANTIC CITY, INC., a New Jersey Corporation; Comcast Cellular Communications, Inc.

No. 94-7021.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

April 22, 1994.

Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge; WILLIAMS and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the court’s order to show cause, filed February 3, 1994; appellants’ response thereto; appellees’ reply to the response; appellants’ motion for leave to file a reply thereto, and the lodged reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a reply to appellees’ reply be granted. The Clerk is directed to file the lodged document. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged. Appellants’ notice of appeal was due, pursuant to Fed. R.App.P. 4(a)(1), on January 19, 1994, 30 days after December 20, 1993, the date of entry of the district court’s order dismissing the action. Because the courthouse, including the district court clerk’s office, was closed on January 19 and 20 due to inclement weather, we conclude that the clerk’s office was “inaccessible” on those dates, and that the notice of appeal was timely filed on January 21, 1994, the date on which the courthouse and clerk’s office reopened. *See*Fed.

*502R.Civ.P. 6(a); Fed.R.App.P. 26(a). We reject appellees’ contention that the clerk’s office was not “inaccessible” because it was physically possible to file papers in the district court’s 24-hour “drop box.” *Cf. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Gridiron Steel Co.,*382 U.S. 32, 33, 86 S.Ct. 152, 153, 15 L.Ed.2d 26 (1965) (per curiam) (notice of appeal due on Saturday timely filed on following Monday, notwithstanding possibility of filing under local order requiring district court to be open for business on Saturday mornings); *Reyes-Cardona v. J.C. Penney Co.,*690 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1982) (per curiam) (Puerto Rican legal holiday excluded under Rule 6(a) from time for filing Rule 59(e) motion, even though district court clerk’s office open on that day); *Prudential Oil & Minerals Co. v. Hamlin,*261 F.2d 626, 627 (10th Cir.1958) (per cu-riam) (Utah state holiday excluded under Rule 6(a), where clerk’s office, although technically open, “locked and unattended”). Appellees’ position is plainly inconsistent with the “considerations of liberality and leniency which find expression in Rule 6(a).” *Union Nat. Bank v. Lamb,*337 U.S. 38, 41, 69 S.Ct. 911, 913, 93 L.Ed. 1190 (1949).

The Clerk is directed to process this appeal in the normal course.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund IV,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
George S. Springsteen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


George S. Springsteen
-----------------------
George S. Springsteen
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      13,934,415
<SECURITIES>                                 4,347,084
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,526,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                   169,664
<INVENTORY>                                  2,894,210
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,920,470
<PP&E>                                       5,626,768
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,889,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,108,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,421,434
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       145,659
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,541,386
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,108,479
<SALES>                                     17,013,735
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,467,099
<CGS>                                        6,111,774
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,755,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               183,394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,155,147)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   149,069
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,304,216)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,304,216)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.65)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Michael A. Ernst, Chief Financial Officer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Prentiss Properties Trust; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 12, 2004
Telephone Log

Date: November 17, 2010

Call between Margaret Sheppard, EPA and Mary Koban, DuPont Fluoroproducts

Re: Unique Fittings for HFO-1234yf

Mary Koban contacted Margaret Sheppard in response to a suggestion from Dr. Chris 

Seeton to address any potential concerns from EPA about unique service fittings for 

HFO-1234yf. Ms. Sheppard explained that existing EPA regulations under SNAP 

require unique service fittings. Typically, EPA will list unique fittings for the high side 

and low side service ports, for large size professional containers for servicing (e.g., 30 lb 

cylinders), and for small can taps, typically used for do-it-yourself servicing. Ms. Koban 

explained that SAE and DuPont have done considerable work to ensure there are 

workable, unique fittings. DuPont is doing its own testing and plans to share that 

information and make it available to anyone interested. Mary Koban also explained that 

work for the fittings for 30 lb cylinders and for other professional service containers will 

be based on the dimensions for the fittings for the low-side service port. She suggested 

that EPA consult with the chair of the SAE committee addressing the SAE J 639 standard. 

Ms. Koban suggested that ideally, a final SNAP rule would reference the unique fittings 

in SAE J 639.
---

---

# Exhibit 10.3

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Elbit Vision Systems Ltd.
(the Company) on Form F-3 (File No. 333-134591), Form F-3 (File No.
333-114153) and on Form S-8 (File No.333-12456) of our report dated May 21, 2006, relating
to the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ Brightman Almagor & Co.
Brightman Almagor & Co.
A Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Tel-Aviv, Israel
June 28, 2006



---

---
United floorplan

Figure 1: Floorplan 
Details of fwd lounge

There is only one area where the conditions called out for firm handhold can not be 

completely met 

This area is the forward lounge (see below, Figure 2). 

Figure 2 

Explanation of Figure 2: 

There are two red lines shown in the figure. 

The inboard line indicates the center of the 65" circle. 

The outboard line indicates the upper end of valance panel which is installed 

throughout the whole cabin. 

The upper end of the valance panel provides firm handhold and has a height of appr. 

1613 mm [~63,5"] and a distance from the inner side of the fuselage of appr. 409 mm 

[~16,1"]; (please see below, Figure 3). 
Figure 3 

For a 5%ile female it might be hard to reach the firm handhold while standing next to 

the fold-out table. 

The 5%ile female has to bend slightly outboard to grap the upper end of the valance 

panel (the firm handhold device). 

Persons with the height of a 5%ile female should also be able to steady themselves 

on interior components with a height less than 33" (e.g. table on left hand side) and 

persons larger than a 5%ile female are able to grap the firm handhold with less 

bending. Persons with the height of a 95%ile male will not have any problems to 

reach the firm handhold device at all.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 27, 1999 AND FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 27, 1999 CONTAINED IN
THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 27, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1999
<CASH>                                             773
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      31503
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 52427
<PP&E>                                           48927
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  107607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            28839
<BONDS>                                          23139
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                       55531
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    107607
<SALES>                                          64719
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 64719
<CGS>                                            44701
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    44701
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 17422
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 412
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2184
<INCOME-TAX>                                       874
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1310
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1310
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>