alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 18, 2009 

d0311 

Order 

 

March 18, 2009 

137709 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137709 

 COA: 287052 

Barry CC: 07-000064-FC 

RICHARD WILLIAM MEXICO, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 25, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-50123 Conference Calendar

__________________ EUGENE SPENCER, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus CHARLES T. CONAWAY ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-95-CV-967
- - - - - - - - - - June 25, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Eugene Spencer, Jr., Texas inmate #245350, appeals the district court's dismissal, with prejudice, of his civil rights complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record, the district court's opinion, and appellant's brief and discern no reversible error. "[C]ivil tort actions are not appropriate vehicles for challenging the validity of outstanding criminal judgments."No. 96-50123 -2- Heck v. Humphrey , 114 S. Ct. 2364, 2372 (1994). In order to recover damages for harm caused by actions whose unlawfulness would render a conviction or sentence invalid, the "plaintiff must prove that the conviction or sentence has been reversed on direct appeal, expunged by executive order, declared invalid by a state tribunal authorized to make such determination, or called into question by a federal court's issuance of a writ of habeas corpus." Id. Spencer's claims call into question the validity of his conviction and sentence and may not be considered in a civil rights action under the rule in Heckbecause Spencer has not demonstrated that his conviction and sentence have been invalidated. This appeal is frivolous and therefore is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Spencer than any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Spencer is further cautioned to review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court. APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
             By:
    
    /s/ Anthony J. MassettiAnthony J. MassettiChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 The
        undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly
        Report on Form 10 QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies
        with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of
        1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of
        the Company.
 
 This
        15th
        day of May, 2007.


/s/
              Daniel R. FurthDaniel
              R. FurthPrincipal
              Financial Officer
U.S. Departmentofthe Interior Bureau of Land Management El Centro Field Ofice 1661 South 4th St El Centro, CA 92243 

## May 2003 

# Imperial 

# Sand Dunes RecreationArea Management Plan

# Chapter 

# I

Introduction

This Recreation Area Management Plan (RAMP)provides direction and guidance to
manage the land and resourcesof the Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area (ISDRA). It

was written after considering the informationin the accompanying Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and will be consideredin writing the Record of Decision. The RAMP implements the Preferred Alternative in the EIS. TheRecord ofDecision will explain the consideration and rationale used by the State Director in making his decision to select and implement the preferred alternative.

The ISDRA, located in eastern Imperial County in Southern California, offers outstanding opportunities for OW recreation within the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) California Desert Conservation Area. The approximately 159,072-acre ISDRA contains the largest mass of sand dunes in California, covering an area more than 40 miles long and averaging 5 miles in width. Map 1 illustrates the regional location ofthe ISDRA.

The ISDRA is considered a world-class OW area and it represents one of the most popular OW areas in the western United States. It is a well-known area to local residents and the thousands who visit each year fiom the southwestern United States and beyond. The ISDRA is the most heavily and intensivelyused OHV recreation area in the California Desert District with over 1.4 million OW visitors per year. In addition,the ISDRAisrecognized for its fiequent use as a backdrop for commercials and movies because of itsunique beauty and landscape. The ISDRA is also recognized for providing unique habitat for several endemic and sensitive plant, insect, and animal species and habitats.

Currently, as a result ofa negotiated settlement agreementbetween the BLM and a coalition of environmental and off-road groups, several areas ofthe ISDRA are temporarily closed in order to protect various species. This RAMP is written using the "current condition" as the management ofthe ISDRAprior to the temporary closure.

The overwhelming popularity and regional importance ofthe ISDRA to visitors, recreational enthusiasts, and others require careful management to protect itsrecreational, natural, and cultural resources.As the designated steward of the ISDRA, the BLM is charged with the responsibility to oversee and manage this ecologicallycomplex and beautiful public treasure. The RAMP was developed as a tool for long-range planning and management oversight ofthese important resources. The RAMP emphasizes recreational use while providing for natural and cultural resource conservation and enhancement.
CSPA	Aerosol	Products	Division	Atmospheric	Policy	Committee

CSPA Member Critical Uses 

of HFC-134a Propellants in Aerosol Products

For Flammability Control and Regulatory Compliance

April 2014

Aerosol Fire Extinguishers

Component Freeze

Dusters (Non-Flammable)

Electrical Solvent Cleaners/Degreasers

Electrical Lubricants

Mold Releases

Party Streamers

Portable Safety Horns (Marine & Industrial)

Refrigeration System Flush (Specialty Degreaser)

Smoke Detector Testers

Tire Inflators/Sealant

Tissue Freezes

Total Release Insecticide Foggers

Defense Sprays

Organic-Use Pesticides
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

38 39 40



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 05/26 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Blast Energy
Services, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John OKeefe, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 11, 2005



By:

/s/ John OKeefeJohn OKeefeCo-Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial
OfficerPrincipal Accounting Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 11596 Summary Calendar

JAMES L. ROSS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. THE CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS,

Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17

- CV

- 570

Before SMITH, WIENER, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Plaintiff

- Appellant James L. Ross appeals the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his lawsuit against Defendant

- Appellee the City of Dallas,
Texas , alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. §1983 and 18 U.S.C. §1964 . Ross’s claims arose from the City’s foreclosure of property occupied but not owned o r leased by Ross.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined t hat this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 28, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-11596 Document: 00515014693 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/28/2019No. 18

- 11596

2 We have reviewed the record, the parties’ briefs, and the record excerpts for this appeal, and we have considered the November 14, 2018 Memorandum Opinion and Order of the district court which sets out in detail the relevant facts and his tory of this almost decade

- old litigation. As a result of our review, we are satisfied that the district court ruled correctly in determining that Ross take nothing against the City of Dallas and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. For essentiall y the reasons thus set forth by the district court, its Judgment of even date with its opinion is

AFFIRMED. Case: 18-11596 Document: 00515014693 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/28/2019
P. 1


# OAR Box 1865 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



## Document

Number: 

# 30 ) IV-E-1 8 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 12/3/20089:15:27

AM Sheet 30of 105P. 2 

# A-83-2 7 IV-E-1 8

CONTAC TREPOR T Dat e Februar y6 , 198 7 Originato rDavi d Whit e CONTAC TBY : TELEPHON E ffl MEETIN G • Othe r NAME , TITL E & ORGANIZATIO N Ar t Hall , Morgantow n ETC , DO E ADDRES S & TELEPHON E NUMBE R (304 ) 291-418 5 PURPOS E O R SUBJEC

T(Giv e project numbe ri fappropriate ) FB C Cos t Analyse s


### SUMMAR Y

1 . MET C ha s conducte dtw o FB C cos t studie s 1 nth e pas t year : 1 ) b y EG& G t o evaluat e th e accurac y o f tw o existin g FB C algorithm s relativ e t o reporte dprojec t cost s base donpublishe dliteratur e (limite dt o bubblin g beds),an d2 ) b y Stearns-Catalyti c whic hcompare dbubblin g an d circulatin g FB C costs . 2 . Th e EG& Gstud

y o f algorith

m accurac y

wa s Inconclusiv e du e t o lac k o f adequat e costin g dat a 1 nth e availabl e literatur e fo r compariso nt o th e mode l estimate s (model s wer e COSTEA M an dINCEPT) . H e wil l sen da copy o f thei r report . 3 . Th e Stearn s stud y (no t ye t released ) conclude dtha t a t uni t size s > 100,00 0 lbs/hr , capita l cost s fo r bubblin g an dcirculatin g bed s ar e roughl y equal . Belo

w 50,00 0 lb/hr , bubblin g bed s ar e lowe r capita l costs . However , du e t o highe r combustio nefficienc y an dlimeston e utilization , operatin g cost s fo r circulatin g bed s ar e expecte dt o b e lower .

C O

at ACTIO N

Distribution :
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT (21)



                    SUBSIDIARIES OF PROFESSIONALS GROUP, INC.



ProNational Insurance Company, a stock, property and casualty insurer
incorporated under the laws of the State of Michigan.

ProNational Insurance Agency, Inc., an inactive insurance agency incorporated
under the laws of the State of Michigan.

Professionals Group Services Corporation, a business corporation incorporated
under the laws of the State of Michigan that administers certain benefit plans
for ProNational employees.

Professionals National Insurance Company, Ltd., a business corporation
incorporated under the laws of the Islands of Bermuda.

American Insurance Management Corporation, a business corporation incorporated
under the laws of the State of Indiana that serves as the attorney-in-fact for
American Medical Insurance Exchange, an inactive Indiana interinsurance
reciprocal exchange.

MedAdvantage, Inc., a business corporation incorporated under the laws of the
State of Florida that provides credentialing verification services for medical
service providers.



                  SUBSIDIARIES OF PRONATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY



PICOM Claims Services Corporation, a business corporation incorporated under the
laws of the State of Michigan that provides claims processing services to
nonaffiliated professional liability companies.

Physicians Protective Plan, Inc., an insurance agency incorporated under the
laws in the State of Florida.

ProNational Casualty Company, a stock, property and casualty insurer
incorporated under the laws of the State of Illinois.

MEEMIC Holdings, Inc., a business corporation incorporated under the laws of the
State of Michigan that serves as an insurance holding company. MEEMIC Holdings
owns MEEMIC Insurance Company, a stock, property and casualty insurer
incorporated under the laws of the State of Michigan.
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06

- 14

- 00102

- CV

Johnny E. Webb, III

v.

Alex Rodriguez, et al.

(No. DC

- 14

- 09393 IN 95TH DISTRI CT COURT OF DALLAS C OUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE MOTION FEE MOTION FEE CLE RK'S RECORD REPORTER'S RECORD FILING FEE PAID TO C OURT THAT TRANSFERRED CASE $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $527.00 $348.00 $195.00 E

- PAID

E

- PAID
E

- PAID
PAID
PAID
E

- PAID LASHAWN A WILLIAMS

SUZY LANGLEY SUZY LANGLEY MELVIN HOUSTON JOHNNY WEBB LASHAWN A WILLIAMS

B alance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the Sixth District of Texas, this August 20, 2015

.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___

____________________ ____ Deputy
EXHIBIT
      99.1





**Report
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





We
      have reviewed the accompanying consolidated financial statements of microHelix,
      Inc. (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2004 and 2003, and for the three months
      then ended. These interim consolidated financial statements are the
      responsibility of the Company's management.





We
      conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the Public
      Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim
      consolidated financial statements consists principally of applying analytical
      procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
      accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
      in
      accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which
      is
      the expression of an opinion regarding the consolidated financial statements
      taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.





Based
      on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be
      made to the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements for them
      to
      be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
      States of America.





As
      indicated in Note 1, certain conditions indicate that the Company may be unable
      to continue as a going concern. The accompanying interim financial information
      does not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
      uncertainty.





/s/
      Stonefield Josephson, Inc.


February
      7, 2005







8
# -State 

# of-- 

# NorthDakota Office of the Governor 

### Jack Dalrymple Governor

U.S. EPAAdministrator c/o Mr. James Martin Regional Administrator 

### (8-RA) U.S. EPA, Region 

### 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 March 7, 2013

Re: North Dakota State Implementation Plan Revision DearMr. Martin: Itis my pleasure to submit to the Environmental Protection Agency revisions to the North Dakota State Implementation Plan. Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the proposed revisions which address Conflict ofInterestrequirements and an alternative monitoring plan for the Milton R. Young Station. We request your approval for these revisions to the State Implementation PEm. Ifyou have any questions to these revisions, please feel free to contactTerry O'Clair, Director, Division of

### Air Quality ofthe North Dakota Department ofHealth at (701)328-5188. Sincerely,

# Kn~ Governor Enc: C: L. David Glatt, Chief, Environmental Health Section Terry O'Clair, Director, Division of

### Air Quality 37:68:56

600 E BoulevardAve. • Bismarck, ND 58505-0001 • Phone: 701.328.2200 • Fax: 701.328.2205 • www.governor.nd.gov
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
  CERTIFICATION
    OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
    2002
    Form 10-K
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e))
                March 11, 2008Date

/s/  Scott
    D. PetersScott
    D. PetersChief Executive OfficerGrubb & Ellis Realty Investors, LLC
    the Manager of NNN 2002 Value Fund, LLC(principal executive officer)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1635]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 VOTE NO ON H.R. 3409, THE REPUBLICAN ANTI-HEALTH ANTI-ENVIRONMENT BILL

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. JIM McDERMOTT

                             of washington

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. McDERMOTT. Mr. Speaker, I've got to hand it to my Republican 
colleagues. When they commit to something, they really commit. This 
Republican House has the worst environmental record in Congress's 
history. We've taken over 300 votes against the environment. And here 
we are again. On our last day to get any real work done, Republicans 
are voting to kill the environment.
  Instead of dealing with important issues like taxes or jobs, 
Republicans are actually trying to repeal auto emissions standards that 
will save Americans $1 per gallon at the pump--standards the auto 
industry wants and that consumers are happy with.
  Instead of helping Americans find jobs, or helping the millions of 
homeowners facing foreclosure, Republicans are gutting clean air and 
clean water standards.
  Instead of doing something to actually help America be a healthier 
place to live and work, Republicans are doing everything in their power 
to spoil it.
   My Republican colleagues are saying regulations are killing the coal 
industry. The truth is that coal isn't selling in America--it just 
can't compete with cleaner, cheaper natural gas. The free market that 
my Republican colleagues worship is working. And the coal industry 
knows it.
  Since coal is being beat here in the U.S. market by cleaner, 
healthier forms for energy, the coal industry has put plans in motion 
to ship our American coal to China. The industry will make millions in 
profits selling our coal, mined from our public lands, to go overseas. 
Trains full of coal will obstruct commerce, especially in the 
northwest, and endanger public health, all at the expense of the 
American taxpayer.
  Make no mistake, today's bill isn't about saving the coal industry. 
The coal industry is doing that already, they're finding other markets. 
This bill is nothing more than a political ploy that puts industry and 
ideology over less expensive energy, public health, and our 
environment, and I urge my colleagues to vote no on this bill.

                          ____________________
```
##### 



Exhibit 32
  Written
    Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
    Pursuant
    to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    Form 10-K
exhibit10_1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


IMPERIUM ADVISERS, LLC


515 Madison Avenue


New York, NY 10022







January 9, 2012







Integrated BioPharma, Inc.


225 Long Avenue


Hillside, NJ 07205







Re:  Extension of Forbearance Agreement







Ladies and Gentlemen:







Reference is made to the Forbearance Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2011 (as amended, the “Forbearance Agreement”), by and between Integrated BioPharma, Inc. (the “Company”) and Imperium Advisers, LLC, in its capacity as collateral agent (in such “Collateral Agent”) for itself and the Investors referred to therein.  Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this letter shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Forbearance Agreement.







In consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is hereby acknowledged, confirmed an agreed that all references in the Forbearance Agreement to “December 31, 2011” are hereby amended to mean “January 12, 2012”.







Furthermore, any interest payments which are due and payable to the Collateral Agent by the Company on or after the date of this letter through January 12, 2012 pursuant to terms of the 8% Senior Secured Notes of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. shall accrue and be due and payable on January 13, 2012.







Except as expressly modified pursuant hereto, no other changes or modifications to the Forbearance Agreement are intended or implied, and in all other respects, the Forbearance Agreement is hereby specifically ratified, restated and confirmed by the parties hereto as of the date hereof.







The effectiveness of this letter agreement shall be subject to the receipt by Collateral Agent of an original (or electronic copy) of this letter agreement duly executed and delivered by the Company.













	  	
Very truly yours,


	  	  
	  	
IMPERIUM ADVISERS, LLC,


	  	
As Collateral Agent on behalf of Investors


	  	  
	  	
By:  /s/ John Michaelson


	  	
Name:  John Michaelson


	  	
Title:  Manager












ACKNOWLEDGED, ACCEPTED AND AGREED:







INTEGRATED BIOPHARMA, INC.







By:  /s/ E. Gerald Kay


Name:  E. Gerald Kay


Title:  CEO
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No’s.33-76372, 333-64691, 333-69044 and 333-103381) of Monaco Coach Corporation ofour report dated March 15, 2006 relating to the financial statements,management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,which appears in this Form 10-K.

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |
| Portland, Oregon               |
| March 15, 2006                 |

** **

----