alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 105 (Tuesday, June 2, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 31342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13414]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 435

[EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0598; FRL-9928- 58-OW]
RIN 2040-AF35

Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Oil and Gas 
Extraction Point Source Category; Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule, extension of the public-comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received requests 
for an extension of the period for providing comments on the proposed 
rule entitled ``Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the 
Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category,'' published in the 
Federal Register on April 7, 2015. EPA extends the comment period in 
order to provide the public additional time to submit comments and 
supporting information.

DATES: Comments: The public comment period for the proposed rule 
published April 7, 2015, (80 FR 18557, is being extended to July 17, 
2015.

ADDRESSES: Comments: Written comments on the proposed rule may be 
submitted to the EPA electronically, by mail, by facsimile or through 
hand delivery/courier. Please refer to the proposal (80 FR 18557) for 
the addresses and detailed instructions.
    Docket. Publically available documents relevant to this action are 
available for public inspection either electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Water Docket in the EPA 
Docket Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., 
Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone 
number for the Public Reading Room is 202-566-1744, and the telephone 
number for the Water Docket is 202-566-2426. The EPA has established 
the official public docket No. EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0598.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Biddle, Engineering and Analysis 
Division (4303T), Office of Water, Environmental Protection Agency, 
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone: 202-
566-0350; email: biddle.lisa@epa.gov.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 435

    Environmental protection, Pretreatment, Waste treatment and 
disposal, Water pollution control, Unconventional oil and gas 
extraction.

    Dated: May 21, 2015.
Kenneth J. Kopocis,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Water.
[FR Doc. 2015-13414 Filed 6-1-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**

 

R-Vision Holdings LLC, aDelaware Limited Liability Company.

 

R-Vision, Inc., anIndiana Corporation.

 

R-Vision Motorized, LLC,an Indiana Limited Liability Company.

 

Roadmaster LLC, anIndiana Limited Liability Company.

 

Bison Manufacturing, LLC,an Indiana Limited Liability Company.

 

Signature MotorcoachResorts, Inc., a Delaware Corporation.

 

Outdoor Resorts of LasVegas, Inc., a Nevada Corporation.

 

Naples Motorcoach Resort, Inc.,a Florida Corporation.

 

Outdoor ResortsMotorcoach Country Club, Inc., a California Corporation.

 

La Quinta MotorcoachResort, Inc., a California Corporation.

 

Port of the IslesMotorcoach Resort, Inc., a Florida Corporation.

 

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1646]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

       RECOGNIZING THE SERVICE OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA'S CODY TAYLOR

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. JEFF MILLER

                               of florida

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. MILLER of Florida. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize Cody 
Taylor, on the occasion of his retirement after thirty-six years of 
service as Clerk of Court for Holmes County, Florida. For more than 
three decades, Mr. Taylor served the citizens of Northwest Florida with 
distinction and unwavering commitment to public service.
  A native of Northwest Florida, Mr. Taylor attended Poplar Spring High 
School in Graceville. There, he helped lead the basketball team to two 
state championships. He received a basketball scholarship to Chipola 
Junior College and to the University of West Florida, where he 
graduated with a bachelor's degree in Political Science and a master's 
degree in Public Administration. In 1976, Mr. Taylor was elected Holmes 
County Clerk. He has served in this capacity with the utmost respect 
and integrity. His tireless work ethic and dedication to the citizens 
of Holmes County for the last thirty-six years did not go unnoticed. In 
2007, Mr. Taylor was named the ``Clerk of the Year'' by the Florida 
Association of Court Clerks and Comptrollers.
  Mr. Taylor's commitment to the Northwest Florida community extends 
well beyond his role as Holmes County Clerk of Court. He is an active 
member of the Holmes County Chamber of Commerce and a devoted member of 
the First Baptist Church. Mr. Taylor served in the Florida Army 
National Guard and as a member of the Bonifay Kiwanis Club and West 
Florida Regional Planning Council. For twenty years, he served as a 
member of the Bonifay Little League Association and as a basketball 
official for the Florida High School Athletic Association. He was also 
the President and Board Member of the Holmes County Fair Association, 
President and co-founder of Holmes Healthcare, and Vice President of 
the Florida Future Farmers of America.
  In addition to his service to the community, Mr. Taylor is also a 
loving and committed husband, father and grandfather. He and his wife 
Brenda, also a Northwest Florida native, have four children, Zachary, 
Whit, Lucas, and Hilary; and eleven grandchildren, Jordan, Jacob, 
Jackson, Kodie, Campbell, Graham, Gwynneth, Eli, Taylor, Brighton, and 
Georgia. I know Mr. Taylor looks forward to spending more time with 
them following his retirement.
  Mr. Speaker, on behalf of the United States Congress, I thank Cody 
Taylor for his dedication to our community, and I congratulate him on 
his retirement. My wife, Vicki and I wish him and his family all the 
best.

                          ____________________
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0477

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

JOHN HILL,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Ray J. Dayton, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 28 2024

08/28/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0477
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,862
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,196
<ALLOWANCES>                                       191
<INVENTORY>                                      2,290
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,470
<PP&E>                                         291,269
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 321,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,013
<BONDS>                                         97,891
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           157
<OTHER-SE>                                     211,604
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   321,082
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,912
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,392
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,740
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,695
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,045
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,045
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 13 (Friday, January 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 3700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00947]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 43 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-168, CP2024-174.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-00947 Filed 1-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

February 14, 2006

Before

Hon. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge

Hon. Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge

Hon. Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ] Appeals from the United Plaintiff-Appellee, ] States District Court for ] the Northern District of Nos. 04-1176, 04-1231 ] Illinois, Eastern and 04-2009 v. ] Division. ] ZACHARY JENKINS, KEVIN REED ] No. 02 CR 236 and ANTOINE HILL, ] Defendants-Appellants. ] Elaine E. Bucklo, Judge.

O R D E R

We ordered a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Paladino , 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005), to determine whether the district court would have imposed the same sentences on Kevin Reed, Antoine Hill and Zachary Jenkins had it understood that the Sentencing Guidelines were advisory. In an order dated December 15, 2005, the district judge determined that she “would not have imposed a sentence of 360 months imprisonment on either Kevin Reed or Antoine Hill.” In a separate order issued the following day, the district judge concluded that she would have imposed the same sentence on Zachary Jenkins, finding that “[t]he Guideline sentence reasonably takes into account his role as a supplier of drugs, his background, the need for deterrence and punishment and the other factors required to be considered under 18 U.S.C. sec. 3553.” UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53Nos. 04-1176, 04-1231 and 04-2009 Page 2

The parties were invited to file simultaneous memoranda addressing the appropriate disposition of these appeals in light of the district court’s determinations. Everyone except Kevin Reed responded.

The government suggests that the sentences of Reed and Hill should be vacated and their cases remanded to the district court for resentencing as that court has requested, and Hill concurs. We agree that this disposition is appropriate.

Jenkins argues that the district judge’s explanation as to his sentence is inadequate under United States v. Cunningham , 429 F.3d 673 (7th Cir. 2005), which precludes affirming a district court’s sentence when the record does not provide adequate assurance that the judge has given meaningful consideration to the § 3553(a) factors. The government, on the other hand, claims that the district judge properly responded to our order. We agree that the district judge’s response to our limited remand was terse, and that a fuller explanation would have been desirable. But as we said in United States v. Brock , No. 03-2279, slip op. at 14 (7th Cir. January 9, 2006), “Although it is preferable that a district court give a thorough explanation of its consideration of [the § 3553(a)] factors in its order on remand, this is not mandated.” We are satisfied here that the district court adequately considered Jenkins’ arguments and the relevant § 3553(a) factors from our review of the record and see no reason why Jenkins’ sentence would be deemed unreasonable in post- Bookerpractice. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the sentences of Reed and Hill are VACATED and their cases are REMANDED to the district court for resentencing, and that the sentence of Jenkins is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1507 Referred in House (RFH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1507

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

            December 27 (legislative day, December 22), 1995

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide for the extension of the Parole Commission to oversee cases 
   of prisoners sentenced under prior law, to reduce the size of the 
               Parole Commission, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PAROLE COMMISSION.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of section 235(b)(1) of the 
Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (98 Stat. 2032) as it related to chapter 
311 of title 18, United States Code, and the Parole Commission, each 
reference in such section to ``ten years'' or ``ten-year period'' shall 
be deemed to be a reference to ``fifteen years'' or ``fifteen-year 
period'', respectively.
    (b) Powers and Duties of Parole Commission.--Notwithstanding 
section 4203 of title 18, United States Code, the United States Parole 
Commission may perform its functions with any quorum of Commissioners, 
or Commissioner, as the Commission may prescribe by regulation.

SEC. 3. REPEAL.

    Section 235(b)(2) of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (98 Stat. 
2032) is repealed.

            Passed the Senate December 22, 1995.

            Attest:

                                             KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
**Exhibit
        32**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 1st Constitution
        Bancorp (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the “Report”),
        each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
 
 (1)           The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/
                    ROBERT F.
                    MANGANOName:
                    Robert F.
                    ManganoTitle: 
                     President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: 
                  August 13, 2007
  /s/
                      JOSEPH M.
                      REARDONName: 
                      Joseph M. ReardonTitle:    Senior
                      Vice President and TreasurerDate:  
                    August 13, 2007
----

EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY DECISION         

No 303/05/COL

of 30 November 2005         

amending for the fifty-first time the Procedural and Substantive Rules in the Field of State Aid

THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY (1),

HAVING REGARD TO the Agreement on the European Economic Area (2), in particular to Articles 61 to 63 and Protocol 26 thereof,

HAVING REGARD TO the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice (3), in particular to Article 24 and Article 5(2)(b) thereof and Article 1 in Part I of Protocol 3 thereof,

WHEREAS under Article 24 of the Surveillance and Court Agreement, the Authority shall give effect to the provisions of the EEA Agreement concerning State aid,

WHEREAS under Article 5(2)(b) of the Surveillance and Court Agreement the Authority shall issue notices or guidelines on matters dealt with in the EEA Agreement, if that Agreement or the Surveillance and Court Agreement expressly so provides or if the Authority considers it necessary,

RECALLING the Procedural and Substantive Rules in the Field of State Aid (4) adopted on 19 January 1994 by the Authority (5),

WHEREAS, on the 9 November 2005, the Commission of the European Communities (6) adopted a prolongation of the Community framework for State aid for research and development (7) until 31 December 2006,

WHEREAS this prolongation is also of relevance for the European Economic Area,

WHEREAS the rules corresponding to the Community framework for State aid for research and development are taken into Chapter 14 of the State Aid Guidelines,

WHEREAS, Chapter 14 of the State Aid Guidelines expires on 31 December 2005,

WHEREAS a uniform application of the EEA State aid rules is to be ensured throughout the European Economic Area,

WHEREAS according to point II under the heading ‘GENERAL’ at the end of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement, the Authority is to adopt, after consultation with the European Commission, acts corresponding to those adopted by the European Commission,

HAVING consulted the European Commission,

RECALLING that the Authority has consulted the EFTA States in letters to Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway dated 9 November 2005 on the subject,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2005.

For the EFTA Surveillance Authority

Einar M. BULL            

President

Kurt JÄGER            

College Member

----

(1)  Hereinafter referred to as the ‘Authority’.

(2)  Hereinafter referred to as the ‘EEA Agreement’.

(3)  Hereinafter referred to as the ‘Surveillance and Court Agreement’.

(4)  Hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Aid Guidelines’.

(5)  Initially published in OJ L 231, 3.9.1994, and in the EEA Supplement No 32, 3.9.1994, as last amended by Decision of 30.11.2005.

(6)  Hereinafter referred to as the ‘EC Commission’.

(7)  Community framework for aid for research and development, published in the OJ C 45, 17.2.1996, p. 5.

----
Exhibit 24.2

UnionBanCal Corporation
March 9, 2011


WHEREAS,officers of UnionBanCal Corporation (the "Corporation") have made presentations to the Audit & Finance Committee and the Board of
Directors regarding the Corporation's financial results for the year ended December 31, 2010; and

WHEREAS,the Audit & Finance Committee has had an opportunity to review and comment on such results; and

WHEREAS, based on the Audit & Finance Committee's discussion with management and the independent auditors and the Audit & Finance
Committee's review of the representation of management and the report of the independent auditors to the Audit & Finance Committee, the Audit & Finance Committee recommended that the
Board of Directors include the audited consolidated financial statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEDthat the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission;

FURTHER RESOLVEDthat the President and Chief Executive Officer, the Vice Chairmen and such other officers of the Corporation as they shall designate in
writing, be, and they hereby are, authorized and empowered on behalf of the Corporation to execute the Form 10-K, in substantially the form submitted to the Board, and file it with
the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and with such other governmental agencies or instrumentalities as such officers deem necessary or
desirable, and to prepare, execute, deliver and file any amendment or amendments to the Form 10-K, as they may deem necessary or appropriate, provided, however, that prior to
filing, all proposed significant changes to the draft Form 10-K, which was presented to the Board, shall be reviewed with the Chair of the Audit & Finance Committee, who
shall determine if the substantive nature of the changes warrant further discussion with the full Audit & Finance Committee; and

FURTHER RESOLVEDthat John F. Woods, David A. Anderson and Morris W. Hirsch, be, and each of them with full power to act without the other hereby is,
authorized and empowered to prepare, execute, deliver and file the Form 10-K and any amendment or amendments thereto on behalf of and as attorneys for the Corporation and on behalf
of and as attorneys for any of the following: the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer, the principal accounting officer, and any other officer of the Corporation.

I
certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Board of Directors of UnionBanCal Corporation at the Regular Meeting of said Board held on March 9, 2011.

I
further certify that the foregoing resolution now stands on the records of the books of the Corporation and has not been modified, repealed or set aside in any manner whatsoever and is
now in full force and effect.

Dated:
March 9, 2011

/s/ MARY A. HELVEY Mary A. Helvey Secretary


---