alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| EXHIBIT 21                                     |
|------------------------------------------------|
| SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT                 |
| Name                                           | State or Country of Incorporation |
|                                           |   |
| 1214741 Alberta Ltd.                           | Canada |
| Casinos Poland Ltd. (1)                        | Poland |
| CC Tollgate LLC                                | Delaware |
| Century Casinos Cripple Creek, Inc.            | Colorado |
| Century Casinos Europe GmbH                    | Austria |
| Century Casinos Management, Inc.               | Delaware |
| Century Casinos Tollgate, Inc.                 | Delaware |
| Century Resorts Alberta, Inc.                  | Canada |
| Century Resorts International Ltd.             | Mauritius |
| Century Resorts Ltd.                           | Mauritius |
| Century Casinos Poland Sp. z o.o.              | Poland |
| Century Calgary Properties Inc.  (2) | Canada |
| Century Casino Calgary Inc. (2)                | Canada |
| WMCK-Acquisition Corp.                         | Delaware |
| WMCK-Venture Corp.                             | Delaware |

| (1)   | The Registrant owns 33.3% of the outstanding shares of Casinos Poland Ltd. and accounts for this investment under the equity method. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | Acquired January 13, 2010. |
|-----------------|----------------------------|
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5050 

To direct the Attorney General, in enforcing the provisions of the Controlled 

Substances Act relating to marijuana, to focus on certain enforcement 

priorities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2018 

Mr. CORREA (for himself, Mr. GAETZ, and Mr. BLUMENAUER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To direct the Attorney General, in enforcing the provisions 

of the Controlled Substances Act relating to marijuana, 

to focus on certain enforcement priorities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sensible Enforcement 

5 of Cannabis Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MARIJUANA ENFORCEMENT PRIORITIES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—In enforcing the provisions of the 

8 Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) relating 

9 to the cultivation, manufacture, distribution, possession, 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5050 IH

1 or use of marijuana, the Attorney General of the United 

2 States shall not prosecute for any conduct that— 

3 (1) concerns marihuana for medicinal or rec4 reational use; and 

5 (2) is authorized by the laws of the State in6 volved. 

7 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) does not apply with 

8 respect to prosecution for prevention of the following: 

9 (1) Distribution of marijuana to minors. 

10 (2) Revenue from the sale of marijuana from 

11 going to criminal enterprises, gangs, and cartels. 

12 (3) Diversion of marijuana from States where it 

13 is legal under State law in some form to other 

14 States. 

15 (4) State-authorized marijuana activity from 

16 being used as a cover or pretext for the trafficking 

17 of other illegal drugs or other illegal activity. 

18 (5) Violence and the use of firearms in the cul19 tivation and distribution of marijuana. 

20 (6) Drugged driving and the exacerbation of 

21 other adverse public health consequences associated 

22 with marijuana use. 

23 (7) The growing of marijuana on public lands 

24 and the attendant public safety and environmental 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5050 IH

1 dangers posed by marijuana production on public 

2 lands. 

3 (8) Marijuana possession or use on Federal 

4 property. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-12549

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHN DAVID MELTON, 

a.k.a. David Melton,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

D.C. Docket No. 4:20-cr-00081-RSB-BKE-4

USCA11 Case: 23-12549 Document: 21-1 Date Filed: 02/20/2024 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 23-12549

____________________

Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

John David Melton appeals from the district court’s order 

denying his motion to dismiss the indictment based on challenges 

to a standing order regarding grand jury procedures utilized during 

the COVID-19 pandemic. In his motion, Melton argued that the 

standing order violated his Fifth Amendment right to a grand jury 

and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6 because it did not ensure 

grand jury secrecy, improperly permitted videoconferencing, and 

resulted in less than a quorum of the grand jurors being present in 

the same room. The government moves to dismiss this appeal for 

lack of jurisdiction, arguing that the district court’s order is not appealable under the collateral order doctrine.

We conclude that the district court’s order is neither final 

nor immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The order is not 

final because Melton has yet to be convicted or sentenced. See 

Flanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259, 263 (1984). And it is not appealable under the collateral order doctrine because it does not involve a right not to be tried, which means it can be effectively reviewed on appeal from a final judgment. See United States v. Shalhoub, 855 F.3d 1255, 1260 (11th Cir. 2017); Midland Asphalt Corp. v. 

United States, 489 U.S. 794, 800, 802 (1989) (stating that, to be effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment, an order 

USCA11 Case: 23-12549 Document: 21-1 Date Filed: 02/20/2024 Page: 2 of 3
23-12549 Opinion of the Court 3

must deprive a defendant not of the right not to be convicted, but 

of the right “not to be tried at all”).

To the extent Melton argued that the standing order failed 

to ensure grand jury secrecy, that alleged violation does not implicate a right not to be tried because it is not “a defect so fundamental 

that it causes the grand jury no longer to be a grand jury, or the 

indictment no longer to be an indictment.” See Midland Asphalt 

Corp., 489 U.S. at 802. Additionally, we recently held that to the 

extent the same standing order at issue here violated Rule 6, that 

violation is not a “fundamental error” that “change[s] the basic nature of [the] grand jury or fatally infect[s] [the] indictment.” See 

United States v. Graham, 80 F.4th 1314, 1317-18 (11th Cir. 2023). 

The district court’s order is therefore not appealable at this 

time, under the collateral order doctrine or otherwise. The government’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this appeal is 

DISMISSED.

USCA11 Case: 23-12549 Document: 21-1 Date Filed: 02/20/2024 Page: 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called the Optional Peg Rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This rate is a weighted average cost of money to the Government for maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. This rate will be 4.88 percent for the January-March quarter of FY 2024.

Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.921(b), the maximum legal interest rate for any Third Party Lender's commercial loan which funds any portion of the cost of a 504 project (see 13 CFR 120.801) shall be 6% over the Prime rate or, if that exceeds the maximum interest rate permitted by the constitution or laws of a given State, the maximum interest rate will be the rate permitted by the constitution or laws of the given State.

David Parrish,

Chief, Secondary Market Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-28804 Filed 12-29-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41060 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. DERRICK DEWAYNE JARVIS Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:07-CR-54-ALL Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Derrick Dewayne Jarvis has moved for leave to withdrawand has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jarvis has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D August 20, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund IV, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kimberly A. Springsteen-Abbott, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/Kimberly A. Springsteen-AbbottKimberly A. Springsteen-AbbottChief Executive OfficerNovember 15, 2010
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1
 Joel P. Moskowitz
    
    Phil Bourdillon/Gene HellerChief Executive Officer
    
    Silverman Heller Associates(714) 549-0421, x8261
    
    (310) 208-2550
 CERADYNE, INC. RECEIVES ORDER FOR
LIGHTWEIGHT HEMTT (Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck)
PROTOTYPE ARMOR KIT
   www.ceradyne.com
----

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August 16, 2010  | By:    | /s/ John MacDonald             |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                                   |   | John MacDonald                 |
|                                   |   | Chief Financial Officer        |
|                                   |   | (Principal Accounting Officer) |
[Logo] COLE+REED P.C.

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

 

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (no.33-87110, 33-98482, 333-06757 and 333-85936) on Form S-8 of The Beard Company our report dated April 17, 2007, relating to the balance sheets of The Beard Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related statements of operations, shareholders' equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, which report appears in the December 31, 2006, annual report on Form 10-K of The Beard Company.

 

|   | /s/ COLE & REED P.C. |
|--------|--------------------------|

 

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

April 17, 2007
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

I, Michael A. Schneider, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of Affinity Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), hereby certify as follows:

 

1.                                    Thisstatement is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with theCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,2009 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

2.                                    The PeriodicReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.                                    Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof the dates and for the periods indicated therein.

 

 

Date:  March 31, 2010

 

 
|   | /s/ Michael A. Schneider               |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                   |
|   | Michael A. Schneider                   |
|   | President and Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 23.1




                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-10571) of our report dated February 10, 1997, on
our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Harborside Healthcare
Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 1996 and 1995,
and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                    /S/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Boston, Massachusetts
March 28, 1997
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, John Hiner, President and Chief Executive Officer of Geocom Resources Inc., and Paul Chung, Chief Financial Officer of Geocom Resources Inc., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Geocom Resources Inc. for the interim period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Geocom Resources Inc.                                                                      |

Dated:  May 16, 2005
| /s/ John Hiner |
|----------------|

John Hiner

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
| /s/ Paul Chung |
|----------------|

Paul Chung

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1203

JAMES P. MIXON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHERYL T. MIXON; RUTH N. MURPHY; FRED MURPHY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-97-136-2, CA-97-137-2)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James P. Mixon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

complaints as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mixon v. Mixon, Nos.

CA-97-136-2; CA-97-137-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 4, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                     
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         303,845
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,271
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               755,684
<PP&E>                                         384,568      
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 807,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          404,914
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       486,887
<OTHER-SE>                                     (84,303)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   807,498
<SALES>                                         14,178
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,178
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,936
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (35,758)   
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (35,758)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (35,758)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.22)
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 8, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51675 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE MANUEL OCHOA-FLORES Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1223-ALL Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Manuel Ochoa-Flores raises arguments that areforeclosed by Almendarez-Torresv. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and thejudgment ofthe district court is AFFIRMED.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We have issued our reports dated March 15, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Century Casinos, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Century Casinos, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-132510, effective March 17, 2006 and File No. 333-13801, effective October 9, 1996).




/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP





Denver, Colorado


March 15, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1064

DORA L. ADKINS, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICE COMPANY, INC., 

Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Michael Stefan Nachmanoff, District Judge. (1:22-cv-01009-MSN-IDD) 

Submitted: April 20, 2023 Decided: April 25, 2023

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Dora L. Adkins, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1064 Doc: 20 Filed: 04/25/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Dora L. Adkins appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for leave to 

file a complaint and application to proceed on that complaint in forma pauperis. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Adkins’ motions 

for leave to amend her informal opening brief and affirm the district court’s order. 

Adkins v. Am. Express Travel Related Serv. Co., LLC, No. 1:22-cv-01009-MSN-IDD 

(E.D. Va. Oct. 17, 2022). We deny Adkins’ motions to vacate and remand, for leave to 

replace, to amend her motion to vacate and remand, for leave to amend the motion to vacate 

and remand, for leave to amend the motion to vacate and remand and to moot all other 

motions, for leave to withdraw, and to expedite the motion for leave to vacate and remand. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1064 Doc: 20 Filed: 04/25/2023 Pg: 2 of 2