alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 3 November 2006         

establishing the sites for the Visa Information System during the development phase

(notified under document number C(2006) 5161)

(Only the Czech, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic)

(2006/752/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 2004/512/EC of 8 June 2004 establishing the Visa Information System (VIS) (1), and in particular Article 3 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1.   During the development of the system, the central unit of the VIS shall be located in Strasbourg (France).

2.   During the development of the system the back up central unit shall be located in Sankt Johann in Pongau (Austria).

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden.

Done at Brussels, 3 November 2006.

For the Commission

Franco FRATTINI            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 213, 15.6.2004, p. 5.

(2)OJ L 131, 1.6.2000, p. 43.

(3)OJ L 64, 7.3.2002, p. 20.

(4)OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p. 36.

(5)OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p. 31.

(6)OJ L 370, 17.12.2004, p. 78.

(7)OJ L 328, 13.12.2001, p. 4.

----
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT AGREEMENT dated the 24th day of January 2005, to a Share
Purchase Agreement dated the 23rd day of December, 2004,

BETWEEN:

                  BRIAN V. SHIPSTON AND
                  THOMAS GOODFELLOW

                  (called the "Vendors")

                  AND

                  THINKPATH INC.

                  (called the "Purchaser")

WHEREAS the above-noted parties (the "Parties") have executed a Share Purchase
Agreement dated the 23rd day of December, 2004 (the "Agreement");

AND WHEREAS the Agreement specifies a Closing Date of January 17, 2005;

AND WHEREAS the Parties have mutually agreed to establish a specific Closing
Date herein, as set forth below;

NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that in consideration of the mutual
covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. The Parties agree that the Closing Date shall be the 17th day of January,
2005.

2. The Parties agree that the Agreement shall be amended to the extent necessary
to reflect the new Closing Date set forth above.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals as
at the first date written above.




                                                  BRIAN V. SHIPSTON
-----------------------------------               ------------------------------
Witness                                           Brian V. Shipston



                                                  THOMAS GOODFELLOW
-----------------------------------               ------------------------------
Witness                                           Thomas Goodfellow


                                                  THINKPATH INC.
                                                   per.

                                                  DECLAN FRENCH
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Declan French
                                                  I have the authority to bind
                                                  the corporation.




                                      -15-
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8) pertaining to the Belden Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(No.33-66830), the Belden Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (No. 33-83154,
No.333-74923, and No. 333-51088), the Belden Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock
Plan (No. 333-11071), and the Belden U.K. Employee Share Ownership Plan
(No.333-75350) of our report dated January 30, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Belden Inc. included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 12, 2003
Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consentto the use in this Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement of our reports dated May 7, 2007relating to the consolidated financial statements of NNN Realty Advisors, Inc. and subsidiaries andOctober 18, 2006 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Triple Net Properties Realty,Inc. and subsidiary appearing in the Proxy/Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement andto the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Prospectus./s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
16644 Roscoe Boulevard Van Nuys, CA 91406

Ph: 818.902.0229 Fax: 818.902.9278

www.helinet.com

To Whom It May Concern:

Helinet Aviation Services is the sole transporta tion provider to the major organ transplant programs in the Los Angeles area. Whether they travel by car, one of our helicopters or a jet, they make one call to us and we make all of the arrangements.

When our teams travel by jet, we almost exclus ively use Chrysler Aviation. Their understanding of

the critical nature of our missions has been a tremendous asset to our company and also, I believe, to the community at large.

In 2010 we sent the teams we work with to 215 di fferent donors by jet. Many of those trips involved more than one team (heart, liver, kidney, etc.), which amounted to around 300 jet trips for organ
procurements.

Occasionally, we have to transport our teams a ve ry long distance. Anywhere near or east of the Mississippi River is what we would consider a critical distance. The reason we consider it critical is that if any delay happens at the donor hospital, we ar e now in a situation where the flight crew may not be able to depart because they would run out of dut y time before the end of the return flight. If this happens and the crew cannot depart, it not only endanger s the life of the recipient waiting for the organ, but it may also render an otherwise viable organ useless.

It is my understanding that Chrysler Aviation is applying for a limited exemption to extend the duty

limit to 16 hours when certain conditions are me t. I have read and reviewed the conditions under which Chrysler is asking to extend duty time limits and I believe that under those conditions that their operations could still be conducted safely. I think it would be a rare occurrence that this exemption would need to be used, but I believe that having it as an option would be a great benefit to the public.

Sincerely,

Al Sousa Operations Manager Helinet Aviation Services, LLC
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

The Board of Directors 

Trimeris, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-44145, No. 333-64064, No. 333-66401, No. 333-74304,No. 333-90377, No. 333-107508, No. 333-129600, No. 333-138807, No. 333-147430, and 333-147431) on Forms S-8 of Trimeris, Inc. of our report dated March 12, 2009, except with respect to the adoption of FASB ASC Topic808, *Collaborative Arrangements*, (as discussed in adoption of new accounting standards of note 1 and paragraph 8 of note 8 to the December 31, 2009 financial statements), as to which the date is as of March 16, 2010, with respect tothe balance sheet of Trimeris, Inc. as of December 31, 2008, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, which appears in the December 31,2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Trimeris, Inc. 

 

As discussed inadoption of new accounting standards of note 1 and in paragraph 8 of note 8 to the December 31, 2009 financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 808, *Collaborative Arrangements*, as of January 1, 2009and, accordingly, adjusted the previously issued statements of operations for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2008. 

 

KPMG LLP 

Raleigh, North Carolina 

 

March 12, 2009, except with respect to the adoption of FASB ASC Topic 808, *Collaborative Arrangements*, (as discussed in adoption of new accounting standards of note 1 and paragraph 8 of note 8 to the December 31, 2009financial statements), as to which the date is as of March 16, 2010
EXHIBIT
      23.2





CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
      S-8 File No. 333-13801) of Century Casinos, Inc. of our report dated March
      1,
      2004, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
      31, 2003 with respect to the financial statements of Century Casinos Africa
      (Proprietary) Limited.








/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers, Inc


*Registered
      Accountants and
      Auditors*


*Chartered
      Accountants (SA)*






Cape
      Town, South Africa


March
      8,
      2006
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1414/2006

of 26 September 2006         

opening a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of maize held by the Hungarian intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Hungarian intervention agency shall open a standing invitation to tender for the sale on the Community market of 200 000 tonnes of maize held by it.

Article 2

The sale provided for in Article 1 shall take place in accordance with Regulation (EEC) No 2131/93.

However, notwithstanding that Regulation:

Article 3

Notwithstanding Article 13(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 2131/93 the tender security is set at EUR 10 per tonne.

Article 4

1.   The first partial invitation to tender shall expire at 15.00 (Brussels time) on 27 September 2006.

The closing dates for the submission of tenders for subsequent partial invitations to tender shall be each Wednesday at 15.00 (Brussels time).

The closing date for the submission of tenders for the last partial invitation to tender shall be 18 October 2006 at 15.00 (Brussels time).

2.   Tenders must be lodged with the Hungarian intervention agency at the following address:

Article 5

The Hungarian intervention agency shall send the Commission the tenders received, no later than two hours after expiry of the time limit for submitting tenders. This notification shall be made by e-mail, using the form in the Annex hereto.

Article 6

Under the procedure laid down in Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003, the Commission shall set the minimum selling price or decide not to award any quantities. In the event that tenders are submitted for the same lot and for a quantity larger than that available, the Commission may fix this price separately for each lot.

Where tenders are offering the minimum sale price, the Commission may fix an award coefficient for the quantities offered at the same time as it fixes the minimum sale price.

Article 7

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 September 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 191, 31.7.1993, p. 76. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 749/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 10).

----

ANNEX

Standing invitation to tender for the resale of 200 000  tonnes of maize held by the Hungarian intervention agency

Form (*1)

(Regulation (EC) No 1414/2006)

----

(*1)  To be sent to DG AGRI (D2)

----
CORRECTED OPINION 

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8368

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

DAVID ZEBROWSKI, a/k/a Dog, a/k/a David Stewart, a/k/a Lewis 

Brady, a/k/a Mad Dog, a/k/a Eric Conrad Smith, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief 

District Judge. (3:96-cr-00041-JRS-3) 

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 30, 2009 

Corrected Opinion Filed: August 28, 2009 

Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

David Zebrowski, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 David Zebrowski appeals a district court order 

granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c) (2006). Under the amendments to the Guidelines, 

Zebrowski’s total offense level was 39. His amended range of 

imprisonment was 292 to 365 months’ imprisonment. On October 

15, 2008, the court granted Zebrowski’s motion and lowered his 

original 360-month sentence to 336 months’ imprisonment. In 

response, Zebrowski filed a timely notice of appeal and a motion 

for reconsideration. While the appeal was pending, the district 

court granted the motion for reconsideration and lowered 

Zebrowski’s sentence to 294 months’ imprisonment. Because the 

court granted the motion for reconsideration and ordered a new 

sentence, the appeal from the October 15, 2008 order is moot. 

 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23(a)


Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8, File No: 333-50389, pertaining to the Financial Consultation
Agreement dated as of January 19, 1998 and the Registration Statement on
Form S-8, File No: 333-62733, pertaining to the LifePoint, Inc. 1997 Stock
Option Plan, of our report dated May 23, 2000, with respect to the financial
statements of LifePoint, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K SB)
for the year ended March 31, 2000.

Ernst & Young LLP

Riverside, California
June 23, 2000
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frank Ruiz, Appellant, v Arthur Leonardo, as Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Berke, J.), entered November 23, 1990 in Washington County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner’s only contention on appeal is that his due process rights were violated because the determination that he violated the conditions of his parole was not made within the 90-day period of Executive Law § 259-i (3) (f) (i). However, the statute does not require that a decision be rendered within the 90-day period, only that the hearing be held within said 90 days. As petitioner’s final revocation hearing was held within 90 days of his probable cause determination, a fact which petitioner admits, there has been compliance with the statute *(see, People ex rel. Haskins v Waters,*87 AD2d 657). In addition, petitioner’s notification of the revocation decision within two weeks of the hearing satisfied the "[a]s soon as practicable” standard of 9 NYCRR 8005.20 (f) *(see, People ex rel. White v Dillon,*81 AD2d 1037, *affd*55 NY2d 672; *cf., People ex rel. Knowles v Smith,*54 NY2d 259).

Casey, J. P., Weiss, Yesawich Jr., Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

WASHINGTON , D.C . • I n^rr ^ 

# ''om m

Notic e of Sky Wes t Airlines , Inc . O f inten t t o terminat e servic e a t Oxnard , C A Pursuan t t o Titl e 4 9 o f

th e U.S . Code , Sectio n 4173 4

NOTIC E O FSKYWES T AIRLINES , INC . T O TERMINAT E SCHEDULE D AI RSERVIC E

A T OXNARD , CALIFORNI A Pursuan t t o Titl e 4 9 o f

th e U.S . Code , Sectio n 41734 , SkyWes t Airlines , Inc . hereb y serve s it s notic e of inten t t o terminat e th e schedule dai r servic e it i s providin g a

t Oxnard , California . I n accordanc e with Sectio n 41734 , SkyWes t Airlines , Inc . supplie s th e followin g information : 1 . Identificatio n o f

Carrie r SkyWes t Airlines , Inc . 44 4 South Rive r

Roa d St . George , U T 8479 0 Communication s wit

h respec t t o thi s documen t

shoul db e directe dto : Eri c Christense n V P Plannin g an dCorporat e Secretar y SkyWes t Airlines , Inc . 44 4 South Rive r

Roa d St . George , U T 8479 0 Telephone : (435 ) 634-334 51 . SkyWes t Airline s provide s schedule dpassenge r ai r servic e a t Oxnard , California . SkyWes t Airline s flight s are operate da s Unite dExpres s pursuan t t o acode-sharin g agreemen t

wit h Unite dAirlines . 2 . At th e tim e of

thi s filin g notice , SkyWes t Airline s serve s Oxnar dwith thre e dail y roun d tri p flight s to/fro mLo s Angeles , CA . Al l servic e i s provide dwith th e 30-sea t Embrae r EMB-12 0 Brasili aaircraft . 3 . Oxnar dha s Essentia l Ai r Servic e Communit y designation , bu t i s withi n 10 0 mile s of Burbank , CA , amediu mhu b a s determine db y th e DOT , an dtherefor e i s not eligibl e for subsidize dai r

service . 4 . Th e effectiv e dat e o f

thi s notic e i s Februar y 19 , 201 0 an dth e las t day o f servic e i s schedule dfor

Jun e 8 , 2010 . Respectfull y submitted ,

Eri c D . Christense n V P Plannin g an dCorporat e Secretary SkyWes t Airlines , Inc . St . George , Utah February 19 , 201 0CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E

I hereb y certif

y that I hav e cause dacop y o f

th e foregoin g notic e of

terminatio n t o b e serve do n February 19 , 201 0 t o eac h of th e persons name dbelow . Denni s Devan y (vi ae-mail ) Chief , EA S an dDomesti c Analysi s U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 40 0 7" ^ Street , S W Washington , D C 2000 7 Th e Honorabl e Dr . Thoma s E . Holde n

Mayo r City o f Oxnar d 30 5 W . Thir dStree t Oxnard , C A 9303 0 Th e Honorabl e Bil l Fulto n

Mayo r Cit y o f Ventura 50 1 Pol l St . Ventura, C A 9300 1 Tod dMcName e Airport Manage r 288 9 W . Fift

h Stree t Oxnard , C A 9303 0
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6232]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. HONDA:
       H.R. 6447.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution of the United 
     States.
```
##### 



Exhibit 99.3

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MeriStar
Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P., MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp.,
MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. II and MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp.
III (the Issuers) for the three months ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald
D. Olinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Issuers, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | 1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m
or 78o(d)); and      
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuers.

Date: May 15, 2003

| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Donald D. OlingerDonald D. Olinger
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P.
MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp.
MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. II
MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. III

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Issuers and will be retained by the Issuers and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23.2
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes