alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 29, 1997 AND
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
29, 1997 CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 29, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000910721
<NAME> DM MANAGEMENT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             383
<SECURITIES>                                     3,846
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,379
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,941
<PP&E>                                           7,081
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,841
<BONDS>                                          4,311
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,950
<SALES>                                         24,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,543
<CGS>                                           10,852
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,762
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,833
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  61
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    887
<INCOME-TAX>                                       346
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                541
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       541
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.4
 SECURITY AGREEMENT
(Pledge of Limited Liability Company Interest)
 
 RECITALS
 
 
        Pledgors Representations and Warranties
 1




---



##### 



Covenants of Pledgor
 General Covenants
    Covenants with Regard to Membership Interest
  2




---



##### 



Defaults; Remedies
 Events of Default
     Remedies
 Security Restrictions
      Remedies Non-Exclusive
 Further Documentation
 3




---



##### 



Termination of Agreement
 Liability and Indemnification
 Notices
    Other Remedies
 Waiver
 Attorneys Fees
 Binding Upon Successors
 Headings
 Governing Law
 Amendment
 Severability
 4




---



##### 



Counterparts
  PLEDGOR:
    APARTMENT ASSETS, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability companyBy:Name:Its: SECURED PARTY:
    SECURED PRINCIPAL, LLC
a Delaware limited liability companyBy:Name:Its: 5
****
 ****
 **EXHIBIT
31.1**
 ****
 **RULE
13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**
 I, **Wray
Thompson** , certify
that:
  1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Leather Factory,
Inc.;
  2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
  4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) *[language
intentionally omitted SEC Rel. 33-8238]* for the
registrant and have:
  (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b) *[Left
blank intentionally SEC Rel. No. 33-8238]* ;
  (c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
  (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.
  
 Date:  March 30,
2005
 /s/
      Wray ThompsonWray
      ThompsonPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5039 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5039

  To designate the National Airmail Museum at Smith Air Field in Fort 
                            Wayne, Indiana.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2018

   Mr. Banks of Indiana (for himself and Mr. Rokita) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the National Airmail Museum at Smith Air Field in Fort 
                            Wayne, Indiana.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Airmail Museum Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) in 1930, commercial airmail carriers began operations 
        at Smith Field in Fort Wayne, Indiana;
            (2) the United States lacks a national museum dedicated to 
        airmail; and
            (3) the airmail hangar at Smith Field in Fort Wayne, 
        Indiana--
                    (A) will educate the public on the role of airmail 
                in aviation history; and
                    (B) honor the role of the hangar in the history of 
                the Nation's airmail service.

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION.

    (a) In General.--The airmail museum located at the Smith Field in 
Fort Wayne, Indiana, is designated as the ``National Airmail Museum''.
    (b) Effect of Designation.--The national museum designated by this 
section is not a unit of the National Park System and the designation 
of the National Airmail Museum shall not require or permit Federal 
funds to be expended for any purpose related to that national memorial.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002I, Kevin R. Ruark, Chief Executive Officer of Family Home Health Services Inc. (the “registrant”),have executed this certification for furnishing to the Securities and Exchange Commission inconnection with the filing with the Commission of the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”). Ihereby certify that, to my knowledge:          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations  of the registrant as of and for the end ofthat period.     July 10, 2006 /s/ Kevin R. Ruark     Kevin R. Ruark    Chief Executive Officer
March 10 , 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF M .C.R. AND F.D.R., CH ILDREN

,

NO. 14

- 14

- 00560

- CV

________________________________ Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on April 11, 2014. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal. We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Williams, Renee (OST) l^SCtJET T)6T- Ci5T-f^^t- ^^7t^ 

Subject: FW: (no subject) '.^. i L "- '.u'-'ivjvl 

From: HITECCHEM@aol.com [mailto:HITECCHEM@aol.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 5:36 AM 

To: Little, Cynthia M (DOT) 

Subject: (no subject) 

As a resident of Chisana it is very important to us to have air service for the following reasons. 

1. The only way we can get to our house. 

2.To bring in food ,gas and tools. 

3. Medical supplies. 

4.As we are mature adults possible medical flights out. 

If we can be any assistance please contact us. Please let us know how this turns out. 

Yours Truly 

Buddy & Lynda Mice 

Carey Hice 

Hitec Chemicals, Inc.
### NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wniteb $)tates QCourtof§ppeaIs for toejfeberaI QCircuit

WYETH AND 

### CORDIS CORPORATION, 

### Plaintiffs/ Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants,
v. 

### ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ABBOTT CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., MEDTRONIC INC., MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC., AND 

### MEDTRONIC USA, INC., 

### Defendants/ Counterclaimants-Appellees, AND 

### BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AND 

### BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC., 

### Defendants/ CounterclaimantsAppellees. 2012-1223, -1224 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in case nos. 08-CV-0230 and 08- CV-1021, Judge Joel A. Pisano.WYETH v. ABBOTT LABS 2



### ONMOTION
Before RADER, 

### Chief Judge. 

### ORDER Wyeth and Cordis Corporation ("Appellants") have filed two motions: 1) a motion for leave to file an extended reply briefnot to exceed 11,000 words; and 2) a motion for leave to file an extended reply brief not to exceed 9,000 words. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Scimed Inc. oppose the first motion and consent to the second motion. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motions are granted to the extent that Appellants may file a replybriefnot to exceed 9,000 words. 

## HOV 14 

## 2m2 Date

cc: David T. Pritikin, Esq.

s25 EdwardA. Mas, II, Esq. Matthew M. Wolf, Esq. Samuel F. Baxter, Esq. FOR THE COURT /s/Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk fiLED
. COlIIT.Of APPEALS rOo**UJ.~**FEDERALr,mCIlIT



## NOV 14ZUff JANHORBAlV 

# a.en<
EXHIBIT
32





SECTION
1350


CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the Annual Report of True Product ID, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Wilson W. Hendricks
III and Michael J. Antonoplos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and








(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








Date:  October
14, 2008





By:   /s/
Michael J. Antonoplos


Michael J. Antonoplos


Secretary and Director and current
Chief


Accounting Officer





By:   /s/
Wilson W. Hendricks III


Wilson W. Hendricks III


Former Chief Executive Officer
and


Chief Accounting Officer (March –
October


2008)
Exhibit 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nexstar Finance, L.L.C.
and Nexstar Finance, Inc. (together, the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|Dated:  November 14, 2003 |  | /s/    PERRY A. SOOK                                               
|------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                          |  | Perry A. Sook                                                      
|                          |  | President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 99.5
 ENVIRONMENTAL INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
(Mezzanine Loan)
 
 RECITALS
 
    AGREEMENT
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1. Definition
    1




---



##### 



2. Representations and Warranties; Compliance With Law .
 3. Indemnification .
 2




---



##### 



4. Remedial Work .
 5. Operations and Maintenance Plan .
     6. Permitted Contests .
 3




---



##### 



7. Subrogation of Indemnity Rights .
 8. Independent Obligations; Survival .
 9. Payment and Interest .
 10. Attorneys Fees and Legal Expenses .
 11. Time of Essence .
 12. Miscellaneous .
 13. Partners Assets
 4




---



##### 



MEMBER:
    APARTMENT ASSETS, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability companyBy:Name:Its: BORROWER: 5




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
  6
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6278]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas:
       H.R. 6523.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 1
```
EXHIBIT 24.1

POWER
OF ATTORNEY

KNOW
ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of UnionBanCal Corporation and the several undersigned officers and directors whose signatures appear below, hereby makes, constitutes and
appoints David I. Matson, David A. Anderson and Morris W. Hirsch and each of them acting individually, its, his and her true and lawful attorneys with power to act without any other and with full
power of substitution, to prepare, execute, deliver and file in its, his and her name and on its, his and her behalf, and in each of the undersigned officer's and director's capacity or capacities as
shown below, an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and all exhibits thereto and all documents in support thereof or supplemental thereto, and
any and all amendments or supplements to the foregoing, hereby ratifying and confirming all acts and things which said attorneys or attorney might do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, UnionBanCal Corporation has caused this power of attorney to be signed on its behalf, and each of the undersigned officers and directors, in the capacity or
capacities noted, has hereunto set his or her hand as of the date indicated below.

UNIONBANCAL CORPORATIONBy:

/s/ MASAAKI TANAKA Name:    Masaaki Tanaka
Title:       President and Chief Executive

Dated:

2/27/09


Signature

Title/s/ AIDA M. ALVAREZ Aida M. Alvarez

Director

3/2/09/s/ DAVID R. ANDREWS David R. Andrews

Director

3/2/09/s/ NICHOLAS B. BINKLEY Nicholas B. Binkley

Director

3/2/09/s/ L. DALE CRANDALL L. Dale Crandall

Director

3/3/09/s/ MURRAY H. DASHE Murray H. Dashe

Director

3/2/09/s/ RICHARD D. FARMAN Richard D. Farman

Director

3/2/09


---



Signature

Title/s/ PHILIP B. FLYNN Philip B. Flynn

Director

2/27/09/s/ CHRISTINE GARVEY Christine Garvey

Director

3/3/09/s/ MICHAEL J. GILLFILLAN Michael J. Gillfillan

Director

3/2/09/s/ MOHAN S. GYANI Mohan S. Gyani

Director

3/3/09/s/ YOSHIAKI KAWAMATA Yoshiaki Kawamata

Director

3/2/09/s/ NOBUO KUROYANAGI Nobuo Kuroyanagi

Director

3/2/09/s/ MARY S. METZ Mary S. Metz

Director

2/28/09/s/ J. FERNANDO NIEBLA J. Fernando Niebla

Director

3/2/09/s/ KYOTA OMORI Kyota Omori

Director

3/2/09/s/ BARBARA L. RAMBO Barbara L. Rambo

Director

3/2/09/s/ MASAAKI TANAKA Masaaki Tanaka

Director

2/27/09/s/ DEAN A. YOOST Dean A. Yoost

Director

3/1/09


---
<PAGE>

                     32.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund IV,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kimberly A. Springsteen, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Kimberly A. Springsteen
---------------------------

Kimberly A. Springsteen
Principal Financial Officer
November 15, 2004
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 47171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18971]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Global Positioning System Adjacent Band Compatibility Assessment 
Workshop

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology, 
Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to inform the public that the 
U.S. Department of Transportation will host a workshop to discuss 
implementation of a Global Positioning System (GPS) Adjacent Band 
Compatibility Assessment. Discussion at this workshop will focus on the 
various implementation steps of the GPS Adjacent Band Compatibility 
Assessment, including development of GPS receiver use cases, 
identification of representative GPS receivers, and development of a 
test and analysis program. In particular, emphasis will be placed on 
the information needed from GPS receiver and antenna manufacturers, and 
the logistics of procuring and handling that information to safeguard 
manufacturer proprietary data. This workshop is open to the general 
public by registration only. For those who would like to attend the 
workshop in person or via WebEx, we request that you register no later 
than September 4, 2014. Please send the registration information to 
stephen.mackey@dot.gov providing:

 Name
 Organization
 Telephone number
 Mailing and email addresses
 Attendance method (WebEx or on site)
 Country of citizenship

DATES: Date/Time: September 18, 2014 10 a.m.-5 p.m. (Eastern Daylight 
Time).
    Location: U.S. Department of Transportation, John A. Volpe National 
Transportation Systems Center, 55 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02142.
    Identification will be required at the entrance of Volpe Center 
facility (Passport, state ID, or Federal ID).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen M. Mackey, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, 
RVT-75, Cambridge, MA 02142, Stephen.Mackey@dot.gov, Telephone: 617-
494-2753.

Gregory D. Winfree,
Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology.
[FR Doc. 2014-18971 Filed 8-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
Order filed August 14, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00506-CV

CRYSTAL R. DAVIS, Appellant

V.

LITTLE NELL APARTMENTS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1047273

ORDER

On July 16, 2014, appellant, who is appearing pro se, filed a timely motion 

in this court challenging the trial court’s July 8, 2014, ruling sustaining a contest to 

her affidavit of indigence. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j)(1), (2). When a motion to 

review the trial court’s ruling on indigence is filed, the trial court clerk and the 

court reporter must prepare, certify, and file the record of the hearing on the 

contest to the claim of indigence within three days after the motion is filed. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j)(3). The county clerk prepared a clerk’s record, but no 

reporter’s record of the hearing has been filed. 
Under the unambiguous language of Rule 20.1(j), if the appellate court does 

not deny a motion under Rule 20.1(j) within 10 days after the motion is filed, this 

motion is granted by operation of law. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j)(4). Even if the trial 

court clerk and the court reporter prepare, certify, and file the hearing record within 

three days after the motion is filed, the appellate court has less than a week to 

review the record and rule on the merits of the motion. If the court reporter does

not file the hearing record within 10 days after the filing of the motion, as in this 

case, this court has no ability to review the merits of the motion, and the motion is 

granted by operation of law regardless of whether the motion has merit. Tex. R. 

App. P. 20.1(j)(4). This new rule places a heavy burden on the trial court clerk and 

the court reporter to act expeditiously in preparing, certifying, and filing the 

hearing record. If they fail to do so, then under the applicable procedure, this court 

has no ability to review the merits of the motion. 

More than 10 days have passed since the motion was filed and appellant’s 

motion was granted by operation of law. Accordingly, appellant may proceed on 

appeal without the advance payment of costs. 

Therefore, we ORDER the Harris County Clerk and the official court 

reporter, Karen S. Bernhardt, to prepare, certify, and file the appellate record 

without the advance payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(k). The record will 

be due in this court 30 days from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM