alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
157 Short Street, Bishop, California 93514 

Tel: (760) 872-8211 Fax: (760) 872-6109 E-mail: farm@gbuapcd.org 

CMP-A 

Revised: December 19, 2008 

Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District 

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PLAN APPLICATION 

GENERAL INFORMATION

A Conservation Management Practices (CMP) plan is a requirement for all agricultural operation sites as specified in 

Section 5.0 of District Rule 502. The goal of this CMP plan is to reduce sources of PM10 emissions from agricultural 

operations. Attach CMP-A, B, C and all other applicable CMP Supplemental Application Forms to this sheet. By 

signing below, the applicant agrees to implement all Conservation Management Practices checked on the attached 

sheets. A fee of (call the District to get the current fees quoted) is due with submittal of this plan to cover the 

District’s cost of plan processing and field inspection for the first year. 

Name of Facility: 

Facility Location: 

Total Farm Acreage: 

Mailing Address: 

City/State/Zip code: 

Phone: Fax: 

Other (Cell): E-mail: 

Person Responsible: Title: 

Signature: Date: 

Please list the following information for the persons responsible for: 

Plan Preparation: Plan Implementation: 

 Same as Person Responsible Above? Same as Person Responsible Above? 

Name: Name: 

Title: Title: 

Address: Address: 

City/State/Zip code: City/State/Zip code: 

Phone: Phone: 

Fax: Fax: 

Other (Cell): Other (Cell): 

FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY 

 This CMP plan application has been verified to contain all supporting information required by the APCO to evaluate the 

application. CMP-A, B and C attached. All other appropriate CMPs attached. Fee paid. Date: ______

Reviewer: Initials: ____________ Date: 

APCO approval: Date: 

CMP

A
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION   1.
	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of 1stConstitution Bancorp;2.
	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
	The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5.
	The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ ROBERT F. MANGANO
FEB f 0 2015 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

DOT Docket Management Facility; 

1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20229 

U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection 

United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Office of Air and Marine (OAM) is 

requesting the renewal of Exemption No. 10300 under docket number FAA-2011-0688. In a 

letter dated January 14, 2013, this office requested an exemption to 14 CFR §91.209(a) (1) and 

(b), during operations of the Predator-B/MQ-9 Unmanned Aircraft in the National Airspace 

System. Additionally this office requested that a summary of the petition not be published in the 

Federal Register due to the potential security-sensitivity of the exemption, which the FAA also 

granted. If the FAA approves the renewal of exemption No. 10300, this office is requesting 

again that it not be published in the Federal Register. 

Justification for this renewal request remains the same as the original request dated May 23, 

2011. CBP has evidence that entities engaging in illicit activity along the borders are actively 

surveilling the night skies for the presence of the Predator "B", which is clearly visible due to the 

anti-collision lights and position lights. Additionally, evidence exists that Night Vision devices 

are also being used to detect the Predator "B". 

The point of contact for this renewal is Joseph Pavero, Domain Operations and Integration. He 

can be reached at 202-325-3957 and joseph.pavero@dhs.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Richard Booth 

Director 

Domain Operations and Integration 

U.S. Customs & Border Protection 

Office of Air and Marine
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) of MCG
Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Steven F. Tunney Sr., the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ STEVEN F. TUNNEY SR.Name:

Steven F. Tunney Sr.Title:

Chief Executive OfficerDate

May 4, 2010
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION I, Joseph M. Reardon, certify that:  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of 1stConstitution Bancorp;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 14, 2005JOSEPH M. REARDONName:
Joseph M. ReardonTitle:
Senior Vice President and Treasurer
# C_2008064EN.01005701.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/57

---

Action brought on 2 January 2008 — Piccoli v OHIM (Representation of a shell)

(Case T-8/08)

(2008/C 64/91)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: G.M. Piccoli Srl (Alzano Lombardo, Italy) (represented by S. Giudici, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul or vary the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 28 September 2007, notified on 23 October 2007, to allow the registration of Community three-dimensional trade mark No 4522892 consisting in the stylised shape of a (scallop) shell, also to distinguish ‘brioches, brioches filled with creams or custards, jams, chocolate or honey’; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul or vary the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 28 September 2007, notified on 23 October 2007, to allow the registration of Community three-dimensional trade mark No 4522892 consisting in the stylised shape of a (scallop) shell, also to distinguish ‘brioches, brioches filled with creams or custards, jams, chocolate or honey’;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Three-dimensional mark representing a shell from four different perspectives (Registration Application No 4.522.892 for goods in Class 30).

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application for registration in respect of ‘preparations made from cereals, pastry, confectionery and ices’.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 4 and 7(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, as well as misconstruction of a number of provisions of Directive 89/104/EEC to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks. It is asserted, in that regard, that both Article 2 of Directive 89/104/EEC and Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 acknowledge, expressly and unambiguously, the intrinsic distinctiveness, not only of the packaging of goods, but also of the very shape of those goods.

Pleas in law:

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1651]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. MARTIN HEINRICH

                             of new mexico

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. HEINRICH. Mr. Speaker, on September 14, 2012, I unfortunately 
missed four votes, which included rollcall Nos. 581, 582, 583 and 584.
  If I had been present, I would have voted ``yes'' on rollcall vote 
581.
  If I had been present, I would have voted ``yes'' on rollcall vote 
582.
  If I had been present, I would have voted ``yes'' on rollcall vote 
583.
  If I had been present, I would have voted ``no'' on rollcall vote 
584.

                          ____________________
```
**THE ,~TJITOIRNEY**  

### GENE-L Q,P TEXAS

Mr. Allen c. Wilson County.Attorney Jrenaell

county Boeme, Texas

way a~confaliseloner,~f one precinct

a&mIpt a+ dversde~ the &ephe+of a'commls+%e~ of *h&r preclnctP'~

. '. Art&l.e.b32 of Ver&~s~Pemd Code oithe State.ofTexq reads as mllgw6:
%o oificerof t&3 Stati & any o~ic~~~of'~ dlstdt., cowty,'clty,precinct., whnol district

or othe&m@clpal'pr?b~ dlvi6len

or this atate;or any officer or member of any @i&e, district,

ccuqty,cits;r

.qchool dlstrld~'or

ojiher..mugcQal,

. . board~or.ju&e ef+uay courti;-by~ee?&wty of -. anygene~or 6p@.allawofthls State,eraayniember tithe. &egislature,

&al& appoint,

or v&z for, or conilnw$be appointment -of

any office,

position,

c$e&shlp, emplowt or.$utq, of any person related

within the secosd,$eg+eby affinity or with+. ~th&thlrddegreebyc oneanguinityto the person go a;ppolntlng or 80 votlgg,or to aqy ethermember of any'mchbqd, the Legi6l&nre, or court of which @cb pe~eoi160 ~~ppo+t&gor oot&g msy'bea mmber,'mhen the salary, fees, '~r'campensati~ of-qch appointee

Is tqbe paid for, directly or lqdlre~$~~~qut

pi or from pqbllcM-or fees of officeof anykInd 0~ @artwter what6oever.~"Mr. AI&Q c. wflson, APrU 6, 1939,pase 2 (0~556)

for a coqrmlsslaner

to employ

anyonerelated

withinthe problblted degree to another

memberof the Co1md66loners' Court,to perform

any labor,

work ?r service,

for the court. Llkewlse, it is a VioLetion

of t& statute

for a' comlesionerto employ6 relative, wlthinthe prohibiteddegree, of another combsloner of the 66~16 Camla6loner6'

Court,to repair

mscMnery for the. comty, wheu said Labor 16 to be paid for out of the appruprlatlan made by the Co6missloners'

Court. Wetrustthatthe foregolng snswel6

your inquiry,

we are VerYtniLyooUr~ --oft By /a/ Frad c. camaler 'FreaC. c%naler AMlhUlt
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1



                   THE MAXIM GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


          COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS)

                 PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE (a)

                    FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 1997,

                   THE TEN MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 1996,

                      AND THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1995

                (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE INFORMATION)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                         1997     1996       1995
                                                                        -------  -------    -------

<S>                                                                     <C>      <C>        <C>
PRIMARY:
 Net earnings (loss) applicable to common and common equivalent shares  $ 2,145  $(4,245)   $ 9,642
                                                                        =======  =======    =======

SHARES:
 Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                    13,468   13,301     12,734
 Shares issuable from assumed exercise of options and warrants              469      N/A(b)     567
                                                                        -------  -------    -------
 Weighted average number of common shares and common share
  equivalents assuming average market price for period                   13,937   13,301     13,301
                                                                        =======  =======    =======

PRIMARY EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE          $   .15  $  (.32)   $  0.72
                                                                        =======  =======    =======

FULLY DILUTED:
 Net earnings (loss) applicable to common and common equivalent shares  $ 2,145  $(4,245)   $ 9,642
                                                                        =======  =======    =======

SHARES:
 Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                    13,468   13,301     12,734
 Shares issuable from assumed exercise of options and warrants              669      N/A(b)     593
                                                                        -------  -------    -------
 Weighted average number of common shares and common share
  equivalents at higher of ending or average market price for period    $14,137   13,301     13,327
                                                                        =======  =======    =======

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE    $   .15  $  (.32)   $  0.72
                                                                        =======  =======    =======
</TABLE>

             (a)  Common equivalent shares represent stock options granted 
                  to key employees and directors and redeemable common
                  stock purchase warrants.

             (b)  Common equivalent shares are antidilutive for the ten 
                  months ended January 31, 1996.
<PAGE>

                     32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CEO

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund IV,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, George S. Springsteen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ George S. Springsteen
-------------------------
George S. Springsteen
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5158 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5158

 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to request nominations for 
  and make determinations regarding roads to be designated under the 
        national scenic byways program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2018

    Mr. Cicilline (for himself and Mr. Poe of Texas) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to request nominations for 
  and make determinations regarding roads to be designated under the 
        national scenic byways program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL SCENIC BYWAYS PROGRAM.

    (a) Request for Nominations.--Not later than 90 days after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall make 
available on the appropriate website of the Department of 
Transportation and cause to be published in the Federal Register a 
request for nominations with respect to roads to be designated under 
the national scenic byways program.
    (b) Designation Determinations.--During the 30-day period beginning 
on the date that is 1 year after the date on which a request for 
nominations is made available and published pursuant to subsection (a), 
the Secretary shall make available on the appropriate website of the 
Department of Transportation and cause to be published in the Federal 
Register a list specifying the roads, nominated pursuant to such 
request, to be designated under the national scenic byways program.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF J.A.G., 

A MINOR CHILD.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-08-00267-CV

Appeal from the

388th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 91-13155)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is a motion by Appellants Maria Esther Mora and The El Paso

County Domestic Relations Office to dismiss this appeal pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(2). 

The parties represent that neither Appellants desire to pursue the appeal. Appellants have

complied with the requirements of Rule 42.1(a)(2). Having considered the motion, we are of the

opinion that it should be granted. The appeal is dismissed. Costs will be taxed against

Appellants. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(d).

November 6, 2008

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.