alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.25
 ARRIS GROUP, INC.
2008 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 Restricted Stock Unit Grant
 
 
 Grant of Restricted Stock Units
 Restrictions
 No Shareholder Rights
 Vesting Exhibit A Exhibit
A
 Conversion




---



##### 



Securities Law Restrictions
   Additional Restrictions
 2




---



##### 



Delivery of Certificates
 Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Grant
    Agreement to Terms of the Plan and Grant
 Fractional Shares
 3




---



##### 



Change in Capital Structure
 Notice
 If to the Company:
    
    ARRIS Group, Inc.3871 Lakefield DriveSuwanee, Georgia 30024Attn: SecretaryIf to the Participant:
    
    The address of the Participant as it
appears in the employment records of the Company
 No Right to Continued Employment
 Impact on Other Plans and Arrangements
 Binding Effect
 Conflicts
 Governing Law
 Tax Consequences and Section 409A
 4




---



##### 



Withholding Obligations
 Amendment or Termination
 Definitions
 Affiliate ,
 Cause
 Change in Control
 5




---



##### 



Code
 Competing Business
 Disabled
  COMPANY:ARRIS GROUP, INC.By:
 6




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A  Vesting Provisions
 Exhibit A both
 I. General Vesting
 Service-Based Vesting
 o
 Percentage of Shares That Vest
    
    Vesting Date___%
    
    __, 20_____%
    
    __, 20_____%
    
    __, 20_____%
    
    __, 20__
 II. Accelerated Vesting
 Accelerated Vesting on Death
 o
 Accelerated Vesting on Disability
 o
 Accelerated Vesting on Change in Control
 o
 7
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his
capacity as an officer of Emmis Communications Corporation (the "Company"),
that, to his knowledge:

(1)      the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
         November 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  January 14, 2003


                                            /s/ JEFFREY H. SMULYAN
                                            Jeffrey H. Smulyan
                                            Chairman of the Board, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 21.1****SUBSIDIARIES OF QLOGIC CORPORATION**QLGC Limited (d/b/a QLogic Ireland) (Ireland)QLogic Hong Kong Limited (Hong Kong)QLogic International Ltd. (Bermuda)QLogic Luxembourg S.a.r.l. (Luxembourg)QLogic México, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Mexico)QLogic Roseville, Inc. (California)QLogic Storage Network Infrastructure (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (China)QLogic Switch Products, Inc. (Minnesota)QLogic System Interconnect Group, Inc. (Delaware)QLogic (UK) Limited (United Kingdom)SilverStorm Technologies, Inc. (Delaware)
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark A. Herpich,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Mark A. HerpichMark
      A. HerpichChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      14, 2010
<PAGE>   1




                                                              EXHIBIT 23.1
                                    CONSENT

              Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-14933) pertaining to the Digene Diagnostics, Inc. 1990 Stock
Option Plan, the Digene Diagnostics, Inc. 1991-A Stock Option Plan, the Digene
Diagnostics, Inc. 1991-B Stock Option Plan, the Digene Corporation Omnibus
Plan, and the Digene Corporation Directors' Stock Option Plan of our report
dated August 15, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Digene Corporation included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 1997, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.


Vienna, Virginia
September 26, 1997                                       /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
#### Leslie Lon SCOTT, Plaintiff in Error, v. F. C. HANSEN, doing business as American Plumbing and Heating Company, Defendant in Error.

No. 36301.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Jan. 25, 1955.

Gerald O’Brien, C. R. Nixon and Lewis J. Bicking, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Ownby & Warren, Tulsa, for defendant in error.

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

This is an appeal by petition in error with case-made attached. The case-made was settled by the trial judge on December 21, 1953. The record discloses that there was no notice of settlement of the case-made. A motion to dismiss has been filed for this reason. The motion must be sustained. In Rutter v. Dunlap, 195 Okl. 88, 155 P.2d 529, we stated:

> “A case-made settled and signed without notice' to the opposing party of the time and place of settling and signing the same, and without the appearance of such party or parties, and without their waiver of such notice, is a nullity and confers no jurisdiction on this court to decide any questions thereunder.”

There was no waiver of any. description of notice of settlement and under the above holding this court is without jurisdiction to consider the alleged errors presented in the case-made.

Appeal dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-10474 Conference Calendar

DON BENNY ANDERSON, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus L. E. FLEMING, Warden FMC-Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CV-00219

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Don Benny Anderson (federal prisoner # 06260-026) filed a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 wherein he sought to challenge his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy, interstate transportation to commit arson, and damaging a building with an explosive device. Concluding that Anderson was required to proceed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 rather than 28 U.S.C. § 2241, the district court summarily dismissed the petition.No. 03-10474 -2- Anderson has failed to satisfy the requirements for filing a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. See Reyes-Requena v. United States , 243 F.3d 893, 900-04 (5th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1** **Certification    pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,** **As    adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act    of 2002**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the    undersigned officers of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International    hereby certifies, to the best of such officer’s knowledge,    that:     1. The Registrant’s quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the    “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934, as amended, and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of Registrant as of and for the periods presented in    the Report. /s/  Timothy    C. Tyson    Timothy C. Tyson    President and Chief Executive Officer     Date: January 30, 2007 /s/  Bary    G. Bailey    Bary G. Bailey    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     Date: January 30, 2007     A signed original of this written statement required by    Section 906 has been provided to Valeant Pharmaceuticals    International and will be furnished to the Securities and    Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of 1st Constitution Bancorp
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Joseph M. Reardon, Vice President and Treasurer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Joseph M. Reardon
---------------------
Joseph M. Reardon
Vice President and Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer
August 9, 2002

                                                                              26
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1688/2006

of 15 November 2006         

derogating from Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002 as regards certain import licences issued for tranche No 4 of subquota III of the tariff quotas for imports of common wheat of a quality other than high quality

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Notwithstanding Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002, the period of validity of import licences issued for imports of common wheat of a quality other than high quality (CN code 1001 90 99) under subquota III (serial number 09.4125) referred to in Article 3 of that Regulation between 1 October 2006 and 16 November 2006, bearing in Section 8 ‘Ukraine’ as the country of origin, may be extended until 31 December 2006 at the request of licence holders. To this end, the authority which issued the licence concerned shall cancel the licence and replace it with a new licence valid until 31 December 2006 or shall extend the validity of the original licence until 31 December 2006.

Article 2

Notwithstanding Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002, the import licences referred to in Article 1 of this Regulation may be used for the import of common wheat originating in all third countries, with the exception of the United States and Canada.

Article 3

1.   Section 44 of customs declarations for imports carried out under import licences as referred to in Article 1 shall contain the following entry:

                     ‘Import under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1688/2006’.

2.   Member States shall send the Commission, electronically and by 15 February 2007, the following information:

Article 4

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 November 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 358, 31.12.2002, p. 88. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 971/2006 (OJ L 176, 30.6.2006, p. 51).

----
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ July 6, 2016

ERRATUM

______________________

Appeal No. 20 16

- 1308

______________________

AMGEN INC., AMGEN MANUFACTURING LIMITED, Plaintiffs

- Appellees

v.

APOTEX INC., APOTEX CORP., Defendants

- Appellants

______________________

Decided: July 5, 2016 P recedential Opinion

______________________ The following change has been made :

On p age 5, line 22 of the opinion , change “ short

- hand ” to “shorthand .”
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40640 Conference Calendar

RAYMOND W. YOUNG et al., Plaintiffs, RAYMOND W. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

R. WATKINS; L. BENDER, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:95-CV-380

- - - - - - - - - - June 16, 1998 Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Raymond Young, Texas prisoner # 536364, appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit without prejudice based upon his failure to comply with an order of the court. Young has failed to brief the only issue arguably on appeal, that is, whether the district court erred in dismissing hisNo. 97-40640 -2- complaint based upon his failure to comply with the court’s order. Young has presented nothing for this court to review. His appeal is frivolous and is therefore DISMISSED. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We warn Young that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Young is cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1645/2006

of 7 November 2006         

amending the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 8 November 2006         

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 of 28 June 1996 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 as regards import duties in the cereals sector (2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annexes I and II to Regulation (EC) No 1626/2006 are hereby replaced by Annexes I and II to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 8 November 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 November 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 270, 29.9.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 161, 29.6.1996, p. 125. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1110/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 12).

(3)OJ L 302, 1.11.2006, p. 7.

----

ANNEX I

Import duties for the products covered by Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 applicable from 8 November 2006

----

(1)  For goods arriving in the Community via the Atlantic Ocean or via the Suez Canal (Article 2(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96), the importer may benefit from a reduction in the duty of:

(2)  The importer may benefit from a flat-rate reduction of EUR 24/t, where the conditions laid down in Article 2(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 are met.

----

ANNEX II

Factors for calculating duties

(2.11.2006-6.11.2006)

1.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:

2.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:
Freight/cost: Gulf of Mexico–Rotterdam: 22,69 EUR/t; Great Lakes–Rotterdam: 31,13 EUR/t.

3.   

----

(*1)  A discount of 10 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*2)  A discount of 30 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*3)  Premium of 14 EUR/t incorporated (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

----
Draft V4.1 TSD Bill Maxwell to: Cortney_Higgins 03/04/2011 04:35 PM Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Marc Houyoux

Cortney --

Attached are the draft V4.1 TSD and its appendix.

Thanks.

Appendices 2005v4.1 Platform Modeled Emissions DRAFT 04mar2011.pdf 2005v4.1 Platform Modeled Emissions TSD DRAFT_04mar2011b.pdf

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Patrick L. Alexander, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

                (1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

              (2) The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Patrick L. Alexander |
|---------------------------|
| Patrick  L. Alexander     |
| Chief  Executive Officer  |
| November 15, 2004         |

 

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1589]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               RECOGNIZING MASTER SERGEANT MICHAEL HUNTER

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. ADAM SMITH

                             of washington

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I rise to honor Master Sergeant 
Michael S. Hunter of the 1st Special Forces Group from Joint Base 
Lewis-McChord, Washington, who has received the Silver Star and the 
Bronze Star with Valor. These medals were awarded by Major General 
Jeffrey Buchanan, I Corps Deputy Commanding General on September 12, 
2012.
  Master Sergeant Hunter performed many heroic acts during his 
deployment to Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. He 
helped execute a joint raid with 28 Afghan commandos and three other 
American special operators. Master Sergeant Hunter put himself in 
danger to protect others and led the way for the U.S. and Afghan 
special operators. In June 2010, he delivered medical assistance to two 
injured soldiers during a long 16 hour firefight.
  His courageous actions earned him the Silver Star and Bronze Star 
with Valor. The Silver Star is the Nation's third highest medal for 
combat valor and ranked fifth in military awards. Master Sergeant 
Hunter's award is also the highest for combat valor that is not unique 
to a specific service branch.
  Mr. Speaker, it is with great honor that I recognize Master Sergeant 
Hunter for receiving the Silver Star and the Bronze Star. I ask my 
colleagues to join me in expressing our great appreciation for his 
dedication to protect and serve our country.

                          ____________________
```
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: April7, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASIDNGTON, DC 

Docket No. FAA-2015-3319 

STONE MOTORS, INC. 

AND/OR DAVID STONE 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2014SW700157 

Respondent 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

'' 

On March 11,2016, a Notice of Assignment ofPrpceeding was filed, which assigned this 

proceeding to the undersigned Judge. · 

On April6, 2016, the Respondent filed its Withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing, stating 

"that the parties have reached a settlement agreement resolving all issues in this matter" 

After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, 

statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; · 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:. 

1. Pursuant to 14 C.F .R. § 13.215, the Respondent has withdrawn its Request for Hearing, 

and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List · 
Docket No. FAA-2015-3319 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

Mr. James Archier 

Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Enforcement Division, Southwest Team . 

10101 Hillwood Parkway 

Fort Worth, TX 76177 

TEL: 817-222-5074 

FAX: 817-222-5945 

Mr. Cary G. Rochelle 

Respondent's Counsel 

2224 St. Michael Dr. 

Texarkana, TX 75503 

TEL: 903-794-2224 

FAX: 903-792-2380 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

ONE COPY 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1634/2006

of 6 November 2006         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 7 November 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 November 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 6 November 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----