alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Thomas H. DAVIDSON, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 94-3013.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 13, 1994.

Thomas H. Davidson, Jr., submitted pro se.

Brian M. Reimer, U.S. Postal Service, of Washington, DC, submitted for respondent. Steven L. Schooner, David M. Cohen and Jeanne E. Davidson, Attys., Dept, of Justice of Washington, DC, represented respondent.

Before NIES,* NEWMAN, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

*

 Circuit Judge Helen W. Nies vacated the position of Chief Judge on March 17, 1994.

ORDER

NIES, Circuit Judges.

Thomas H. Davidson, Jr., appeals the affirmance of his removal from the United States Postal Service for unsatisfactory attendance and failure to adhere to the required work schedule. Before the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), Mr. Davidson asserted a claim of discrimination. In *Williams v. Department of the Army,*715 F.2d 1485 (Fed.Cir.1983), this court held that it had no jurisdiction over the merits of a mixed case, *i.e.,*one involving an adverse *224action and a claim of discrimination. However, a case which was presented to the MSPB as a mixed case will be heard by this court if the petitioner files an explicit waiver of the claim of discrimination. The government argues that simply by appealing to this court, Mr. Davidson has waived his discrimination claim. We disagree. As held in *Daniels v. United States Postal Service,*726 F.2d 723, 724 (Fed.Cir.1984), a waiver of a claim of discrimination must be by an express written statement.

Mr. Davidson filed no statement that he waived his claim of discrimination on the merits. Inappropriately, the waiver he filed indicates he seeks review of the MSPB’s dismissal of his case for lack of jurisdiction or untimeliness, issues not involved at this stage of the proceedings.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

Petitioner file with the court within 15 days of the date hereof either (1) a request for this court to proceed which must be accompanied by the appropriate waiver, or (2) a request for transfer to a particular United States district court.

In the absence of a timely response, the appeal is subject to dismissal for lack of prosecution.
#### Deshawn GREEN, Debby Venturella, and Diana P. Bertollt, on behalf of themselves and all others situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Eloise ANDERSON, individually and in her official capacity as Director, California Department of Social Services; California Department of Social Services; and Thomas Hayes, Director, California Department of Finance, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 93-15306.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 13, 1994.

Decided April 29, 1994.

Amended June 13, 1994.

Theodore Garelis, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, CA, for defendants-appellants.

*96Mark D. Rosenbaum, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before: GOODWIN, NORRIS, and O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

We AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. *Green v. Anderson,*811 F.Supp. 516 (E.D.Cal.1993). This panel will retain jurisdiction over the case.

This Court’s Order, filed April 29, 1994, is hereby corrected by inserting the words “the preliminary injunction” between “AFFIRM” and “for.”

The April 29, 1994 Order is redesignated ORDER FOR PUBLICATION.
© Florida Climate Center, Florida State University

Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies

2035 E. Paul Dirac Dr., 223 RM Johnson Bldg., Tallahassee, FL 32306-2840

Phone: (850) 644-3417, Fax: (850) 644-5092

Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Copyright | Disclaimer

About Topics Products & Services Climate Data Access Tools Affiliates

Home Products & Services Data 1981-2010 Normals Venice

Venice

Station: Venice

County: Sarasota

COOP ID Number: 089176

1981-2010 Temperature Normals

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual

Max 71.5 73.4 76.7 80.7 86.1 89.1 90.6 90.7 89.2 84.7 78.9 73.7 82.1

Mean 61.4 63.6 67.2 71.1 76.8 80.9 82.3 82.6 81.0 75.6 69.3 64.0 73.0

Min 51.3 53.9 57.7 61.5 67.5 72.8 74.0 74.6 72.8 66.6 59.6 54.4 63.9

1981-2010 Precipitation Normals

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual

Total 2.44 2.24 3.81 2.48 2.27 75.0 7.32 7.78 6.93 3.57 1.80 2.34 50.48

1981-2010 Degree Days

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual

HDD 166 101 53 11 <0.5 0 0 0 <0.5 4 33 119 488

CDD 55 64 121 194 366 478 536 547 480 334 161 89 3426

Venice - Florida Climate Center http://climatecenter.fsu.edu/products-services/data/1981-2010-normals/venice

1 of 1 5/14/2012 12:21 PM
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7872
GREGORY H. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusLIEUTENANT STONE; M. J. MCDADE, Superintendent; ODIS TEMPLE, Superintendent, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 95-7876
GREGORY H. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W. E. MCMICHAEL; MR. KARASOW; MR. CRUTCHFELD; FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN, JR.; LYNN PHILLIPS; RICKIE ROBINSON; RANDALL LEE; KENNETH WHITEHEAD; C. E. JONES; ALONZO WIGGINS; GUARD SLEDGE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94-406-CT-5-BO, CA-94-490-5-CT)23 Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory H. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, Jane Ray Garvey, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appel lant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Stone , No. CA-94-406-CT-5-BO; Jones v. McMichael , No. CA-94-490-5-CT (E.D.N.C. Nov. 13 and 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, March 06, 2024, 10:00 a.m. to March 06, 2024, 04:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 07, 2023, 88 FR 77326.                

This meeting notice is amended to change the date from 3/06/2024 to 3/05/2024. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: January 9, 2024.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-00626 Filed 1-12-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4993 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4993

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to authorize the designation 
                    of additional taxable vaccines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2018

  Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. Higgins of New York) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to authorize the designation 
                    of additional taxable vaccines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Vaccine Access Improvement Act of 
2018''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF DESIGNATION OF ADDITIONAL TAXABLE VACCINES.

    (a) In General.--Section 4132(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) by adding at the end of paragraph (1) the following new 
        subparagraph:
                    ``(Q) Any other vaccine designated by the Secretary 
                of Health and Human Services for purposes of this 
                subchapter.''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Effective date of designations.--Any designation made 
        under paragraph (1)(Q) shall apply to sales and uses on or 
        after the date of such designation. In the case of the sale of 
        a vaccine before the date of the designation of such vaccine 
        under such paragraph for which delivery is made on or after 
        such date, the delivery date shall be treated as the sale 
        date.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to vaccines designated after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 11, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 11, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19I0201. WILLIAM JOE PAGE v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

19M0119 19M0118
Docket Number: FAA - 2011 - 0995
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

The following certification accompanies the issuer’squarterly report on Form 10-QSB and is not filed, as provided in Release33-8212.  34-47551 dated May 13, 2003.

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPALFINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the accompanying quarterly reporton Form 10-QSB of Coast Bancorp for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, I,Berta F. Olson, Chief Financial Officer of Coast Bancorp, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           suchquarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Coast Bancorp for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           theinformation contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Coast Bancorpfor the quarter ended September 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Coast Bancorp.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Coast Bancorp and will be retained by CoastBancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

Dated:  November 14, 2005

 
|   | /s/  Karan Pohl                |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   | Karan  C. Pohl                 |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer       |
|   | (Principal  Financial Officer) |

----
1 15A NCAC 02D .0408 is amended with changes as published in 24:04 NCR 162 as follows: 

2 

3 15A NCAC 02D .0408 LEAD 

4 The ambient air quality standard for lead and its compounds, measured as elemental lead by a reference method based on 

5 Appendix G of 40 CFR Part 50 or by an equivalent method established under 40 CFR Part 53, is 1.5 0.15 micrograms per 

6 cubic meter, maximum arithmetic mean over a calendar quarter [based on a rolling three month period with a maximum (not7 to-be-exceeded) form, evaluated over a three year period.] meter. The standard is met when the maximum arithmetic three 

8 month mean concentration for a three year period, as determined in accordance with Appendix R of 40 CFR Part 50, is less 

9 than or equal to 0.15 micrograms per cubic meter.

10 

11 History Note: Authority G.S. 143-215.3(a)(1); 143-215.107(a)(3); 

12 Eff. June 1, 1980; 

13 Amended Eff. January 1, 2010; July 1, 1984.
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D2024

- 0617 L.T. Case No. 2023

- 32465 -CICI

_____________________________ A LAN M ILLER M C C ARTY , Appella nt,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County. Karen A. Foxman, Judge. Alan McCarty, Graceville, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach , for Appellee.
August 2 0 , 20 24 P ER C URIAM
. A FFIRMED
. H ARRIS , J AY , and M AC I VER JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1324]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    OUR UNCONSCIONABLE NATIONAL DEBT

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. MIKE COFFMAN

                              of colorado

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, July 25, 2012

  Mr. COFFMAN of Colorado. Mr. Speaker, on January 20, 2009, the day 
President Obama took office, the national debt was 
$10,626,877,048,913.08.
  Today, it is $15,882,491,122,065.69. We've added 
$5,255,614,073,152.61 to our debt in just over 3 years. This is debt 
our Nation, our economy, and our children could have avoided with a 
balanced budget amendment.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT
31.4
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, Ray
Sienko, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Century Casinos, Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date:
April 15, 2005
 
 ________________________________
 Ray
Sienko
 Chief
Accounting Officer
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   Exhibit 21

                                                                                                         State of
     List of Subsidiaries                                                                              Incorporation


<S>                                                                                                       <C>   
Harris Chemical North America, Inc.                                                                       Delaware
     GSL Corporation                                                                                      Delaware
       IMC Kalium Ogden Corp. (formerly, Great Salt Lake Minerals Corporation)                            Delaware
                  GSL Agricultural-Industrial Trading, Inc.                                               Delaware
                  GSL Solar Consultants & Advisors, Inc.                                                  Delaware
                  Weber Canal Water Company                                                               Utah
       NAMSCO Inc.                                                                                        Delaware
                  IMC Salt Inc. (formerly, North American Salt Company)                                   Delaware
                  Carey Salt Company                                                                      Delaware
                  Lake Crystal Salt Company                                                               Utah
                  The Hutchinson & Northern Railway Company                                               Kansas
                  Sifto Canada, Inc.                                                                      Canada
                  Timberlea Chemical Company                                                              Delaware
       IMC Chemicals Inc. (formerly, North American Chemical Company)                                    Delaware
                  Searles Domestic Water Company                                                          California
                  Searles Valley Residences, Inc.                                                         California
                  Trona Railway Company                                                                   California
                  North American Terminals, Inc.                                                          California
                  Harris International Export Company                                                     Guam
                  North American Carbonate Company                                                        Delaware
                  North American Bicarbonate Company                                                      Delaware
                  Oldexaer, Inc.                                                                          Delaware
                  White River Nahcolite Minerals Ltd. Liability Company                                   Colorado
                  WRNM Holdings, Inc.                                                                     Delaware
</TABLE>





<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.14





SECOND AMENDMENT TO PLACEMENT AGENCY AGREEMENT





THIS AMENDMENT is made as of this 18th day of MAY, 2011 (this “Amendment”) by and between Trident Partners, Ltd. (“Trident”), and Blast Energy Services, Inc. (the “Company”).





WITNESSETH:





WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into that certain placement agency agreement, dated November 15, 2010, as amended on November 19, 2010 (the “Original Agreement”);





WHEREAS, in connection with the Original Agreement, Trident introduced an investor (“XXXXXX”) to the Company and XXXXXX invested $2,522,111 (the “Original Financing”) with respect to the Company’s operations of a specific oil well;





WHEREAS, in lieu of their fee owed with respect to the Original Financing, Trident has agreed to accept warrants to purchase common stock of the Company;





NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which all of the parties hereto hereby acknowledge, the parties hereto agree as follows (capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings as in the Original Agreement):





1.  Article 3, Section (c) of the Original Agreement shall be deleted and replaced, in its entirety, with the following:





“(c)           In the event of the Lenders and/or Investors taking a net revenue interest in the well being for a defined period of time TP would receive a net revenue interest equivalent to 10% of the Lender’s and/or Investor’s interest; provided, however, that solely with respect to the Original Financing and the funds received by the Company from XXXXXX, Trident agrees to accept 400,000 2-year warrants to purchase common stock of the Company, with each warrant carrying an exercise price of $0.01.  In the event that XXXXXX and the Company determine that XXXXXX will invest more funds as a means of supplementing the Original Financing, then Trident shall receive an additional number of warrants determined on a pro rata basis by dividing (i) the amount of Original Financing by (ii) the amount of the supplemental financing, and multiplying that number by 400,000.”





2.  All other fees paid to Trident with respect to any other investments in the Company including, but not limited to, additional financing by XXXXXX in addition to the Original Financing, shall be on the same terms and conditions as contained in the Original Agreement.





3.  All other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement are unmodified and remain in full force and effect.





4.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which when taken together shall constitute an original.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.





Trident Partners, Ltd.

Blast Energy Services, Inc.By:
/s/ Edward Flynn

By:
/s/ Michael L. PetersonEdward Flynn

Michael L. Peterson