alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ ROBERT F. MANGANO                             |                                                          |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:                                                                                                                                                                | Robert F. Mangano                                             |   |
| Title:                                                                                                                                                                                   | President and Chief Executive Officer     |
| Date:                                                                                                                                                                                    | August 13, 2009                                               |

| /s/ JOSEPH M. REARDON                                 |                                |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:                                                                                                                                                                                        | Joseph M. Reardon                   |   |
| Title:                                                                                                                                                                                                           | Senior Vice President and Treasurer |   |
| Date:                                                                                                                                                                                                            | August 13, 2009                     |   |

----
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies(the “Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Ricardo Salas                                    |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Ricardo Salas, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| May 10, 2006                                         |

 

1

----
---

---

Exhibit 10.2

Consent of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-12456) pertaining to 2000
stock option plan and in the registration statements (Form F-3 No. 333-134591 and
No. 333-114153) of Elbit Vision Systems Ltd., of our report dated July 8, 2005, with
respect to the financial statements of Yuravision Co., Ltd., included in this Annual
Report (Form 20-F) of Elbit Vision Systems Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ Ernst & Young Hang Young,
Ernst & Young Han Young
Seoul, Korea
June 28, 2006



---

---
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1557/2006

of 18 October 2006         

laying down detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 1952/2005 as regards registration of contracts and the communicaiton of data concerning hops

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1952/2005 of 23 November 2005 concerning the common organisation of the market in hops and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 1696/71, (EEC) No 1037/72, (EEC) No 879/73 and (EEC) No 1981/82 (1), and in particular the fourth and fifth indents of Article 17 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Only contracts for hops harvested in the Member State concerned shall be registered under Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1952/2005.

Article 2

The body designated by the Member State in accordance with Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1952/2005 shall register all deliveries made, distinguishing between contracts concluded in advance, referred to in Article 14(2) of that Regulation, and other contracts.

Article 3

Contracts concluded in advance shall be concluded in writing. A copy of each contract concluded in advance shall be communicated by the producer or recognised producer group to the body referred to in Article 2 within one month of its conclusion.

Article 4

The registration of contracts other than those concluded in advance shall be on the basis of a duplicate of the receipted invoice to be sent by the seller to the body referred to in Article 2.

The seller may send such duplicates either as and when deliveries are made or all together, but must in any event send them by 15 March.

Article 5

For each harvest, the Member States shall send the Commission the information detailed in the Annex by electronic means by 15 April of the year following the harvest concerned.

Article 6

Regulations (EEC) Nos 776/73 and 1375/75 are hereby repealed.

Article 7

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 October 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 317, 3.12.2005, p. 29.

(2)OJ L 74, 22.3.1973, p. 14. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1516/77 (OJ L 169, 7.7.1977, p. 12).

(3)OJ L 139, 30.5.1975, p. 27.

----

ANNEX

HOPS: Contracts concluded in advance and harvest statement

Information to be sent to the Commission by 15 April of the year following that of the harvest concerned

----

(1)  Farm-gate price.

(2)  Member States using their national currency must use the conversion rate applicable on 1 January of the year following the harvest.

----
157 Short Street, Bishop, California 93514 Tel: (760) 872-8211 Fax: (760) 872-6109 E-mail: farm@gbuapcd.org

CMP-A
Revised: December 19, 2008 

### Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District


### CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT P RACTICES PLAN APPLICATION

G ENERAL 

### I NFORMATION
A Conservation Management Practices (CMP) plan is a require ment for all agricultural operation sites as specified in Section 5.0 of District Rule 502. The goal of this CMP plan is to reduce sources of PM 10 emissions from agricultural operations. Attach CMP-A, B, C and all other applicable CMP Supplemental Application Forms to this sheet. By signing below, the applicant agrees to implement all C onservation Management Practices checked on the attached

sheets. A fee of ( call the District to get the current fees quoted) is due with submittal of this plan to cover the District’s cost of plan processing and field inspection for the first year.

Name of Facility:

Facility Location:

Total Farm Acreage:

Mailing Address:

City/State/Zip code:

Phone: Fax:

Other (Cell): E-mail:

Person Responsible: Title:

Signature: Date:

Please list the following information for the persons responsible for:
Plan Preparation: Plan Implementation:

Same as Person Responsible Above? Same as Person Responsible Above?

Name: Name:

Title: Title:

Address: Address:

City/State/Zip code: City/State/Zip code:

Phone: Phone:

Fax: Fax:

Other (Cell): Other (Cell):

FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY

This CMP plan application has been verified to contain all supporting information required by the APCO to evaluate the application. CMP-A, B and C attached. All other appropriate CMPs attached. Fee paid. Date:

______

Reviewer: Initials: ____________ Date:

APCO approval: Date: CMP

A
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF MAX CAPITAL GROUP LTD.**

This certification isprovided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 of Max Capital Group Ltd.(the “Issuer”). 

I, W. Marston Becker, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that: 

(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Issuer. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

Dated: November 6, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6029

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MYRON B. AULL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, Senior District

Judge. (CR-99-543, CA-02-2054, CA-02-2055)

Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 22, 2003

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Myron B. Aull, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Myron B. Aull seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An appeal may

not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Aull has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
ex10-1.htm



Exhibit 10.1


 



STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING


(COIL TUBING CLEANER)










Coil Tubing Technology, Inc. (CTT) is a manufacturer and provider of coiled tubing tools and equipment to the oilfield well service industry and oil companies.







Hammelmann Corporation (Hammelmann) is a leader in the industry of industrial nozzles and high-pressure pump systems.







Hammelmann manufactures a “Coil Tubing Cleaner” for surface cleaning of coil tubing.







CTT is the developer of a method that is provided in conjunction with the Hammelmann Cleaner that filters and containerizes waste.







Hammelmann Corporation agrees to provide CTT the Coil Tubing Cleaner and CTT agrees to market, field test and report performance to Hammelmann. The financial agreement for revenues is that, of 50/50 split between CTT and Hammelmann.







CTT will pay Hammelmann all customary repair charges of the cleaner provided to CTT within five (5) days of return of the cleaner to Hammelmann. (This allows CTT to invoice the customary charges to the customers).







This agreement will remain in effect until agreement is terminated with sixty (60) day written notice from either party.







CTT will provide a monthly royalty report (Exhibit “A” attached) by the 15th of every month following closing of billing of prior month to Hammelmann Corporation, Dayton, Ohio.










This agreement is in effect 01/01/07 and will continue until termination is notified in written communication:




















	  	  
	
IF TO:

	
Hammelman Corporation


	  	
600 Progress Road


	  	
Dayton, Ohio 45449


	  	  
	  	  
	
IF TO:

	
Coil Tubing Technology, Inc.


	  	
19511 Wied Rd., Ste. E


	  	
Spring, Texas 77388















  





  











  
























	
Hammelmann Corporation

	
Coil Tubing Technology, Inc.


	
Mike Goecke

	
Jerry Swinford


	
/s/ Mike Goecke
**Exhibit 10.62**

**FIRST AMENDMENT TO**

**VICE CHAIRMAN AGREEMENT**

FIRST AMENDMENT, dated as of May 19, 2005 (the “First Amendment”) to the Vice Chairman Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as ofApril 25, 2001, between NICHOLAS L. RIBIS (“Ribis”) and COLONY RIH ACQUISITIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). 

WITNESSETH: 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend Section 2.01 of the Agreement as more fully setforth herein. 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and inconsideration of the agreements herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

1. Defined Terms. Unless otherwise defined herein,capitalized terms in this First Amendment have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. 

2. Amendment. Section 2.01 ofthe Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 

“2.01 Subject to and effective upon consummation ofthe RIH Acquisition, the Company hereby engages Ribis, and Ribis hereby agrees to provide services to the Company for the period commencing on the date of consummation of the RIH Acquisition (the “Effective Date”) and terminating onJune 1, 2006 (as the same may be extended as set forth below, the “Term”), unless extended by mutual written agreement of the parties; provided, that the period of employment shall automatically be extended for successive one(1) year periods if neither party has provided six (6) months prior written notice to the other of its intention to have this Agreement lapse at the expiration of the Term; and provided further, that the Term shall be subject to earliertermination in accordance with Articles III, IV and V below.” 

3. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed and governedby the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to conflicts of laws principles thereof which might refer such interpretations to the laws of a different state or jurisdiction. 

4. Full Force and Effect of Agreement. Except as specifically amended herein, all other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force andeffect in accordance with its terms. All references in the Agreement to “this Agreement” shall be deemed to refer to the Agreement as amended by this First Amendment. 

5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts (including by facsimile), each of which shall be deemed an original, but all ofwhich shall constitute the same instrument. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to be executed as of the datefirst above written. 

 

RESORTS INTERNATIONAL HOTEL

AND CASINO, INC.(f/k/a Colony RIH

Acquisitions, Inc.)
By: 
/s/ Thomas J. Barrack, Jr.
Name: Thomas J. Barrack, Jr.Title: Chairman of the Board 
/s/ Nicholas L. Ribis
 Nicholas L. Ribis
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09210**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 09210\09210_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09210\09210_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 09210\09210_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09210\09210_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09210\09210_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09210\09210_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09210\09210_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09210\09210_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

09210\Certification Statement Plant ID 09210.pdf Plant certification statement x 09210\Follow-up and resubmittals\Copy of Part C.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up x 09210\Follow-up and resubmittals\email response_(2 7 2011) Richard Montgomery - Logan Generating Plant Updated Information.pdf Draft Questions for Follow Up x 09210\Follow-up and resubmittals\Originals replaced\09210_Part A_originals.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up x 09210\Follow-up and resubmittals\Originals replaced\09210_Part B_original.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up x 09210\Follow-up and resubmittals\Originals replaced\09210_Part C_original.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up x 09210\Follow-up and resubmittals\Originals replaced\09210_Part D_orginal.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up x 09210\Follow-up and resubmittals\Part A resubmit.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up x 09210\Follow-up and resubmittals\Part D resubmittal .xls Draft Questions for Follow Up x 09210\Follow-up and resubmittals\Part_B_resubmit.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up x 09210\Supplemental Documents\09210_10134 Aerial Exhibit Plan[1].pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09210\Supplemental Documents\09210_Land Use Map[1].pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 09210\Supplemental Documents\09210_Logan's Fly Ash System[1].pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09210\Supplemental Documents\09210_Water Balance Wastewater[1].pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09210\Supplemental Documents\Resubmittals not converted\Part A resubmit.xlsm Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09210\Supplemental Documents\Resubmittals not converted\Part C.xlsm Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09210\Supplemental Documents\Resubmittals not converted\Part D resubmit.xlsm Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09210\Supplemental Documents\Resubmittals not converted\Part_B_resubmit.xlsm Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in theSteam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
EXHIBIT 32





<PAGE>


19




      In connection with the Annual Report of ONTV, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Daniel M. Fasano, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of her knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


                              By  /s/ Daniel M. Fasano
                                  --------------------------------------
                                  Daniel M. Fasano, Chief Executive and
                                  Principal Financial Officer

October 12, 2004
EXHIBIT
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
      undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly
      Report on Form 10 QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Company.





This
      15th
      day of May, 2006.











/s/
      Daniel R. Furth


Daniel
      R.
      Furth


Principal
      Financial Officer
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEXAS ELPASO, TEXAS

I N RE: ERI C FL ORES,
Relator. § § § § § § No . 0 8- 08 -0 02 78 -C R

AN ORI GI

NAL PROCEEDI

NG I N MANDA MUS

MEMORAN DUM OP INION ON P ETIT ION F OR WRIT OF M ANDAM US Re lato r , E r ic F lo r e s , h a s f il e d a pro se pe tit ion

fo r wri t of

mand amus a sk ingthi s Co ur t to
or de r t he Ho n. Al ma

Tr e jo, Judg e of

the El Pa so Cr im in al Co urt a t L aw N o. 1, to a llo w h im t o pres ent, “non-frivolous leg al claims in his writ of habe as cor pus to challeng e his illeg al confine ment.” In order to obtain relief thr oug h a writ of m andamus, a relator must establish: (1) no other adequate re medy

at law is available and (2) that the act he se eks to compel is ministerial. Dicke ns v. Court of Appeals For Second Supre me J udicial Dist. of T

exas , 727 S.W .2d 542, 548 (Tex.Crim.Ap p . 1 9 8 7 )
. A na c t i s mi n is te r ia l i f it d o e s n o t i n v o lv e th e e xe r c is e o f an y d is c r etion. Sta t e ex re l. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Distri ct , 34 S.W .3d 924, 927 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001). Howe ver, a

so-ca lled discret i o nary

function may

become minist eria l when the f acts a nd circ umstances dictate but one rational decision. B u n tion v . Harmon , 827 S.W .2d 945, 948 n.2 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992). Ba sed upon the pe tition and lim ited rec ord provided to us, Flores ha s not established that he does not have adequate re medies at lawor that the a cts he se ek s t o compel we re ministerial. SeeT EX .R.A PP . P
. 5 2
. 7. There fore , Flore s has fa iled to demonstrate he is entitled to the relief he has

reque sted. Acc ording ly , we de ny mandamus re lief.
October 16, 2008 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, J ustice B e f o r e C h e w , C
. J. , M c C l ur e , a n d C ar r , JJ. (Do Not Publish)