alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1538]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

CONGRATULATIONS TO YORKTOWN HIGH SCHOOL FOR BEING NAMED A NATIONAL BLUE 
                             RIBBON SCHOOL

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. MIKE PENCE

                               of indiana

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 14, 2012

  Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, I rise to recognize an exemplary school in 
Indiana's Sixth Congressional District. Yorktown High School in 
Yorktown, Indiana, has been named a National Blue Ribbon School by the 
U.S. Department of Education. Yorktown High School earned this 
recognition for its excellence in education, showcased through its 
high-performing students as measured by state assessments or 
nationally-normed tests.
   Yorktown High School has been a staple of the community, serving 
students in grades 9-12 for more than 100 years with a dedication to 
core beliefs, including that curriculum and instruction will be 
research or evidence-based with student achievement being measured to 
ensure continuous progress. Also, it holds fast to the core belief that 
school leaders will expect and support ongoing improvement of teaching 
and student performance and that students will learn and perform best 
when stakeholders maintain high expectations. Not only does Yorktown 
High School boast a graduation rate of 95 percent, but in 2011, seniors 
at Yorktown High School passed AP exams at a rate of 30 percent, 
compared to the national average for public schools of 18.1 percent.
   I want to congratulate Yorktown High School students, administrators 
and teachers for earning this prestigious award. You have made not just 
Yorktown, but the entire Hoosier state proud.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Tiao Tsan Lai and Hsin Nan Lin hereby jointly certify as
follows:

      (a)   They are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
            Officer, respectively, of City Network, Inc. (the "Company");

      (b)   To the best of their knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on
            Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2004 (the "Report")
            complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section
            13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (c)   To the best of their knowledge, based upon a review of the Report,
            the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company for the period certified.


    Date: July 20, 2004       By: /s/ Tiao Tsan Lai
                                  ------------------------------------
                                  Tiao Tsan Lai
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  (Principal Executive Officer)

    Date: July 20, 2004

                              By: /s/ Hsin Nan Lin
                                  ------------------------------------
                                  Hsin Nan Lin
                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                  (Principal Financial Officer)


                                      -21-
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 13, 2023 No. 04-23-00044-CR IN RE Jose Javier GONZALEZ VILLEDA Original Mandamus Proceeding 

### O R D E R Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice On January 12, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion to stay pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. This court believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(b). Respondent and real party in interest may file a response to the petition in this court no later than February 2, 2023. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. Relator’s emergency motion for temporary stay is GRANTED IN PART as follows: 1. All pretrial settings requiring relator’s in-person appearance are STAYED pending further order from this court. Pretrial settings that do not require relator’s in-person appearance may proceed. 2. The January 23, 2023 trial setting is STAYED pending further order from this court.

It is so ORDERED on January 13, 2023. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1595]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    OUR UNCONSCIONABLE NATIONAL DEBT

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. MIKE COFFMAN

                              of colorado

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Mr. COFFMAN of Colorado. Mr. Speaker, on January 20, 2009, the day 
President Obama took office; the national debt was 
$10,626,877,048,913.08.
  Today, it is $16,012,971,761,294.54. We've added 
$5,386,094,712,381.46 to our debt in 3.5 years. This is $5.4 trillion 
in debt our nation, our economy, and our children could have avoided 
with a balanced budget amendment.

                          ____________________
```
Table of Contents

Exhibit 8.1

SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

The table below sets forth all of our direct and indirect significant subsidiaries and the percentage of equity of each subsidiary we owned directly or indirectly as of December 31, 2006:

|                                                         |  |  |  |                 |  |           
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------- |  | ----------
|                                                         |  |  |  | Jurisdiction of |  | Percentage
|Name of Company                                          |  |  |  | Incorporation   |  | Owned     
|Propimex, S.A. de C.V.                                   |  |  |  | Mexico          |  | 100.00%   
|Corporación Interamericana de Bebidas, S.A. de C.V       |  |  |  | Mexico          |  | 100.00%   
|Panamco México, S.A. de C.V.                             |  |  |  | Mexico          |  | 99.24%    
|Kristine Oversease, S.A. de C.V. (holding company of     |  |  |  |                 |  |           
|Brazilian operations)                                    |  |  |  | Mexico          |  | 83.11%    
|Industria Nacional de Gaseosas, S.A. (holding company of |  |  |  |                
|our Colombian operations)                                |  |  |  | Colombia        |  | 97.66%    

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID SPF Macaque Breeding Colonies.                    

*Date:*                         February 7, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G53, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Konrad Krzewski, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities,  National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G53, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-747-7526,                         *konrad.krzewski@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 3, 2024.

Lauren A. Fleck, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-00201 Filed 1-8-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.15

                                         As of March 26, 1997

Carson Pirie Scott & Co.
331 West Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203
Attention: Board of Directors

Charles J. Hansen
Vice President, General Counsel,
 and Secretary
331 West Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203

     I agree (1) to waive the terms of Section 6(b), second sentence, clause
(ii), with respect to all stock options granted to me by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors on March 26, 1997 under the 1993 Carson
Pirie Scott & Co. Stock Incentive Plan (the "Options") and (2) that the vesting
of the Options shall be governed exclusively by the terms of the stock option
agreement covering the Options. I understand that this letter waiver is a
material inducement to the Compensation Committee to grant the Options. This
letter waiver applies only to the Options and not to any previous or subsequent
grant of stock options and does not affect any other term of the Employment
Agreement dated as of March 25, 1996 between Carson Pirie Scott & Co. and me,
including without limitation Section 12(d) of that agreement.

                                              Sincerely

                                              /s/ Michael R. MacDonald

                                              Michael R MacDonald
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4984 

To amend the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy 

Act of 1977 to allow for 1890 institutions to carry over an increased 

percentage of extension funding received during the previous fiscal year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2018 

Ms. ADAMS (for herself, Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, and Mr. LUETKEMEYER) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the National Agricultural Research, Extension, 

and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 to allow for 1890 

institutions to carry over an increased percentage of extension funding received during the previous fiscal year. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Carryover Equity Act’’. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4984 IH

1 SEC. 2. ALLOWING 1890 INSTITUTIONS TO CARRY OVER AN 

2 INCREASED PERCENTAGE OF EXTENSION 

3 FUNDING. 

4 Paragraph (4) of section 1444(a) of the National Ag5 ricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act 

6 of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 3221(a)) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘No more than’’ and inserting 

8 the following: ‘‘For fiscal years ending on or before 

9 September 30, 2018, no more than’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new sen11 tence: ‘‘For fiscal years beginning on or after Octo12 ber 1, 2018, the limitation specified in the preceding 

13 sentence shall not apply and 100 percent of such 

14 funds may be carried forward to the succeeding fis15 cal year.’’. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
EX-10.11



 





Exhibit 10.11




Computer Associates International, Inc.

Restricted Stock Award Certificate




	 	 	 	 	 
	

Name of Participant

	 	

EmplID
	 	 






	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Grant Number

	 	 	Option	 
	 	Total Number of Restricted Stock Awards Granted

	 	 	**Total Granted**	 
	 	Grant Date

	 	 	Grant Date	 
	 	Stock Price on Grant Date

	 	 	Price	 
	 




This Certificate confirms the grant under the Computer Associates International, Inc. 2002
Incentive Plan, amended and restated effective as of March 31, 2004 (the “Plan”), to the
above-named participant of the amount of Restricted Stock set forth above. This Certificate
merely evidences such grant, and does not constitute property of any nature or type or confer any
additional rights. This grant is subject in all respects to the applicable terms of the Plan,
which are incorporated by reference in this Certificate. A copy of the Plan may be obtained at no
cost by contacting the Corporate Treasurer.



This Restricted Stock award will vest in equal (or approximately equal) installments on each of
the grant date, the first anniversary of the grant date and the second anniversary of the grant
date of this award. Shares of Restricted Stock that are included in this award may not be
transferred by the participant prior to vesting and shall be forfeited by the participant upon the
participant’s Termination of Employment, as defined in the Plan, prior to vesting for any reason
other than death or Disability, as defined in the Plan.



Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, this Restricted Stock grant shall be subject to the
applicable terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement entered into by and between Computer
Associates International, Inc. and the participant, dated as of [___], which are
incorporated herein by reference.



The Company may satisfy any federal income tax withholding obligations that arise in connection
with the vesting of the Restricted Stock (or in connection with an election by the participant
under section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, 1986, as amended, with respect to the Restricted
Stock) by withholding shares of Restricted Stock that are part of this award having a Fair Market
Value, as defined in the Plan, on the date the shares of Restricted Stock first become taxable
equal to the minimum statutory withholding obligation with respect to such taxable shares.




	 	 	 	 	 
	By
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	

	 	 
	

	 	John A. Swainson                    	 	 
	

	 	President and CEO
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

July 8, 2020

Order 

Clerk

July 8, 2020

160846(25)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 160846

v COA: 350364

Wayne CC: 15-006895-FC

CHRISTOPHER REMINGTON LAWRENCE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to file an amended 

application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The amended application will be accepted 

for filing if submitted on or before August 3, 2020.
----

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November 15, 2010  | By:    | /s/ John MacDonald             |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                                     |   | John MacDonald                 |
|                                     |   | Chief Financial Officer        |
|                                     |   | (Principal Accounting Officer) |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Ireland, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Putnam County (Braatz, J.), rendered December 6, 1939, as amended December 7, 1989, convicting him of driving while under the influence of alcohol *140(Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]; § 1193 [1] [c]) and failure to keep to the right (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1120 [a]), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Putnam County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The trial court properly permitted the People to call as a rebuttal witness the Town Justice who arraigned the defendant one hour after his arrest. The witness’s testimony served to contradict the defendant’s claim that, while he had refused the request of the arresting officers to submit to sobriety tests, he had offered to do so in the presence of the Judge. Moreover, the Justice’s opinion as to the defendant’s sobriety was properly received to rebut the defendant’s testimony that he had not consumed alcoholic beverages on the date in question. The defense advanced a theory that the arrest was the result of a personal vendetta by the local police department, and thereby attempted to undermine the veracity of the arresting officers’ opinions as to the defendant’s intoxication elicited on the People’s case-in-chief. Accordingly, the rebuttal testimony of the Town Justice was highly relevant to this issue and was properly admitted. Even if this testimony were not technically of a rebuttal nature, the court properly exercised the discretion afforded it by CPL 260.30 (7) to allow the presentation of evidence which is more properly a part of the direct case in the interest of justice *(see, People v Harris,*57 NY2d 335, 345-346, *cert denied*460 US 1047).

We find no merit to the defendant’s claim that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel.

Finally, the sentencing court appropriately exercised its discretion in imposing a sentence of probation and a four-month period of incarceration. The sentencing record reveals that the court thoughtfully considered the principal objectives of punishment and the relevant sentencing guidelines in imposing sentence. The court also endeavored to achieve a sensitive balance between the defendant’s circumstances, which included a background of three convictions for alcohol-related driving offenses within two years, with society’s interests, in imposing the custodial portion of the sentence and in otherwise tailoring the conditions of probation to enable the defendant to overcome his alcohol abuse *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Moreover, the record does not support the defendant’s claim that his sentence was enhanced because of his status as a lawyer and public official. Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4840 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

567 East Franklin Street in Oviedo, Florida, as the ‘‘Sergeant First 

Class Alwyn Crendall Cashe Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2018 

Mrs. MURPHY of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 567 East Franklin Street in Oviedo, Florida, 

as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class Alwyn Crendall Cashe Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SERGEANT FIRST CLASS ALWYN CRENDALL 

4 CASHE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 567 East Franklin Street in 

7 Oviedo, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4840 IH

1 ‘‘Sergeant First Class Alwyn Crendall Cashe Post Office 

2 Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant First Class 

7 Alwyn Crendall Cashe Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS