# SUPPORTING STATEMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources

1. Identification of the Information Collection

1(a) Title of the Information Collection

NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources (40 CFR part 63,

Subpart JJJJJJ)

1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract

This supporting statement addresses information collection activities that will be imposed

by the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial,

Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources, at 40 CFR part 63 subpart JJJJJ (Area

Boilers NESHAP).

The Area Boilers NESHAP fulfills the requirements of section 112 of the Clean Air Act

(CAA), which requires the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to promulgate

national emission standards for industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers.

The information collection activities in this information collection request (ICR) include

initial and annual stack tests, fuel analyses, operating parameter monitoring, biennial tune-ups,

one-time energy audits, one-time and periodic reports, and maintenance of records. Varying

levels of requirements apply to each subcate gory. The Area Boilers NESHAP contains six

subcategories: existing boilers designed to burn biomass, coal, or liquid fuels and new boilers

designed to burn biomass, coal, or liquid fuels. The information collection activities will enable

EPA to determine initial and continuous compliance with emission standards for regulated

pollutants, and ensure that facilities conduct proper planning, operation, and unit maintenance.

Records and reports required by the NESHAP for industrial, commercial, and

institutional boilers area sources are necessary to enable EPA to identify sources subject to the

standards and to ensure that the standards are being achieved. Records and reports must be

maintained at the facility and/or submitted to EPA. All reports are sent to the delegated state or

local authority. In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are sent directly

to the EPA regional office.

Approximately 182,671 existing boilers at 91,336 facilities are anticipated to be subject

to the regulation, and an additional 6,779 new boilers at 3,390 facilities are expected to become

subject to the standard in the next three years. The cost of this ICR will be $215 million per year

in annualized capital and start-up and O&M costs and 3.6 million burden hours (rounded) per

# 2 year during the first three years after the rule is promulgated.

The burden to the “Affected Public” for each boiler subcategory may be found in Tables

1.A-8.C in Attachment A. The burden to the “F ederal Government” is attributed entirely to

work performed by federal employees or governme nt contractors; this burden may be found in

Tables 9.A-9.C of Attachment B.

2. Need for and Use of the Collection

2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection

Section 112(d) of the CAA requires us to establish NESHAP for both major and area

sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) that are listed for regulation under CAA section

112(c). A major source emits or has the potential to emit 10 tons per year (tpy) or more of any

single HAP or 25 tpy or more of any combination of HAP. An area source is a HAP-emitting

stationary source that is not a major source. Mercury (Hg) and polycyclic organic matter (POM)

are the 112(c)(6) pollutants listed for the industrial, commercial and institutional area source

boiler source category.

CAA section 112(k)(3)(B) calls for EPA to identify at least 30 HAP which, as the result

of emissions from area sources, pose the greatest threat to public health in the largest number of

urban areas. EPA implemented this provision in 1999 in the Integrated Urban Air Toxics

Strategy (Strategy), (64 FR 38715, July 19, 1999). Specifically, in the Strategy, EPA identified

30 HAP that pose the greatest potential health threat in urban areas, and these HAP are referred

to as the “30 urban HAP.” CAA section 112(c)(3) requires EPA to list sufficient categories or

subcategories of area sources to ensure that area sources representing 90 percent of the emissions

of the 30 urban HAP are subject to regulation.

Under CAA section 112(d)(5), we may elect to promulgate standards or requirements for

area sources "which provide for the use of generally available control technologies or

management practices (“GACT”) by such sources to reduce emissions of hazardous air

pollutants." Additional information on GACT is found in the Senate report on the legislation

(Senate Report Number 101-228, December 20, 1989), which describes GACT as:

. . . methods, practices and techniques which are commercially available and

appropriate for application by the sources in the category considering economic

impacts and the technical capabilities of the firms to operate and maintain the

emissions control systems.

Consistent with the legislative history, we can consider costs and economic impacts in

determining GACT, which is particularly important when developing regulations for source

categories that may have many small businesses such as these.

In the Administrator's judgment, pollutant emissions from industrial, commercial, and

institutional boilers at area sources of HAP cause or contribute to air pollution that may

# 3 reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, NESHAP are being

proposed for this source category at 40 CFR part 63, subpart JJJJJJ. The NESHAP will propose

MACT floor control for Hg from existing and new coal-fired boilers and carbon monoxide (CO)

MACT floor control, as a surrogate to POM, fo r existing and new coal, biomass, and liquid fuel

boilers. In addition, this NESHAP will propose GAC T level of control for filterable particulate

matter (PM) from new units, based on the technologies identified in the New Source

Performance Standards for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters

(40 CFR part 60, subparts Db, Dc).

2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data

The information will be used by EPA to: (1) Identify new, modified, reconstructed and

existing sources subject to the Area Boilers NESHAP; (2) ensure that the Area Boilers NESHAP

is being properly applied; (3) ensure that the Boilers Area Source NESHAP is being complied

with; (4) ensure, on a continuous basis, that the operating parameters established during the

initial performance test are not exceeded.

In addition, records and reports are necessary to enable EPA to identify facilities that

may not be in compliance with the Area Boilers NESHAP. Based on reported information, EPA

will decide which facilities should be inspected and what records or units should be inspected at

the facilities. The records that facilities mainta in will indicate to EPA whether facility personnel

are properly operating and maintaining the boiler and associated control equipment.

3. Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria

The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under (40 CFR part 63, subpart

JJJJJJ).

3(a) Nonduplication

If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directly to the

appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directly to the delegated

state or local agency. If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to

implement the Federal standards, a copy of the report submitted to the state or local agency can

be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, no

duplication exists.

3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB

A public notice of this collection was provided in the notice of proposed rulemaking for

the Boilers Area Source NESHAP.

3(c) Consultations

# 4 The burden estimates were based on Agency experience from similar notification,

recordkeeping, and reporting requirements from the vacated NESHAP for Boilers and Process

Heaters at Major Sources (40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART DDDDD). Additionally, some limited

recordkeeping and reporting requirements were made using estimates from other area source

rules that sought to reduce recordkeeping and reporting burden.

The estimated burden for reports related to energy audits were estimated based on

comparable audit programs that exist for smaller commercial and institutional entities at two

utilities: Pacific Gas and Electric, and CenterPoint Energy. These audits were estimated to

consist of a brief pre-screening activity over the phone, a 2 to 4 hour site visit for the audit, and

an additional 2 to 4 hours for follow-up calculations and preparation of a report summarizing

recommendations and findings from the audit. Since energy audits at industrial facilities tend to

require additional time to assess, an alternative estimate for industrial energy audits was

provided by Port Townsend Paper Corporati on during the 2009 Small Business Regulatory

Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) panel for this proposed rulemaking.

The public will also be provided with the opportunity to review and comment on the

proposed Area Boilers NESHAP and this ICR during the comment period.

3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection

For sources with applicable emission limits, the Area Boilers NESHAP provides the

option of demonstrating compliance through initial and periodic fuel analysis (for sources that

burn fuels with pollutant contents lower than the emission limits) or through initial and annual

stack testing. If a source can demonstrate that the fuel(s) burned in the boiler has a pollutant

content that is less than the applicable emission limit, then the Area Boilers NESHAP requires

that the source conduct initial fuel analyses, periodic fuel analysis, and initial and semiannual

reporting.

For small sources (i.e., boilers with heat input capacity of less than 10 million Btu per

hour (mmBtu/h) that demonstrate compliance through biennial tune-ups, the Area Boilers

NESHAP requires that the source maintain records of the tune-up including notes on the

inspection of the burner, flame pattern, air-to-fuel ratio, and the measured CO concentrations

before and after the tune-up was completed. These reports do not need to be submitted unless

requested by the Administrator. The EPA chos e a biennial recordkeeping frequency to be

consistent with the frequency of each tune-up.

If a source demonstrates compliance with an emission limit, during the initial stack tests

(for PM or Hg), or performance tests (for CO), the owner or operator must establish maximum or

minimum values for each applicable operating parameter. Thereafter, the owner or operator

must, in some cases, conduct annual tests for filterable PM, Hg, and CO and must always

continuously monitor the operating parameters of control devices installed to reduce emissions

# 5 of PM, CO, or Hg. The activities associated with setting these site-specific operating limits

include monitoring of the parameters during the performance test, reviewing and averaging the

monitoring data, and, if necessary, calculating average values for fuel pollutant content. The

annual performance testing, where applicable, will ensure, on an ongoing basis, that the air

pollution control device is operating properly and its performance has not deteriorated. Sources

that demonstrate compliance through performance testing must continuously monitor control

device operating parameters and conduct periodic fuel analyses, and complete initial and

semiannual reporting. The EPA chose the frequency of these activities to provide an adequate

margin of assurance that affected facilities will not operate for extended periods in violation of

the regulations.

Although continuous monitoring of operating parameters cannot provide a direct

measurement of emissions, it is less expensive than continuous emission monitoring systems

(CEMS) and the collected information can ensure that the boiler and associated air pollution

control equipment are operated properly on a continuous basis. For larger boilers, those greater

than 100 mmBtu/hr, CO CEMS are more cost effective and are required to be installed under the

proposed rule. This information assures EPA and the public that the reductions envisioned by

the Area Boilers NESHAP are being achieved. Less frequent monitoring would not ensure

continuous compliance. The semiannual reporting requirement allows submission of required

information and data on established operating parameters so that any potential problems can be

identified in a timely fashion.

3(e) General Guidelines

These reporting or recordkeeping requirement s do not violate any of the regulations

promulgated by OMB under 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5.

The Area Boilers NESHAP requires the respondents to maintain all records, including

reports and notifications for at least five years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as

applied to the standards. EPA believes that the five year records retention requirement is

consistent with the Part 70 permit program and the five year statute of limitations on which the

permit program is based. The retention of records for five years allows EPA to establish the

compliance history of a source, to identify any pattern of non-compliance and to determine the

appropriate level of enforcement action. EPA has found that the most flagrant violators have

violations extending beyond five years. In add ition, EPA would be prevented from pursuing the

violators due to the destruction or nonexistence of essential records.

3(f) Confidentiality

Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made

will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2,

subpart B - Confidentiality of Business Information (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1,

1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR

# 6 17674, March 23, 1979).

3(g) Sensitive Questions

The reporting or recordkeeping requirements in the standard do not include sensitive

questions.

4. The Respondents and the Information Requested

4(a) Respondents/NAICS Codes

The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are owners or operators

of new or existing industrial, commercial, or institutional boilers. The Area Boilers NESHAP

affects any industry, federal, state, local, or tr ibal government, or any institution (e.g., university)

using a boiler as defined in the regulation. This includes, but is not limited to, the following

North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes listed in Table 1 below.

Table 1: NAICS Categories for Various Affected Sources

Standard NAICS Codes NAICS Codes

321 Wood product

manufacturing.

311 Food manufacturing.

327 Nonmetallic mineral product

manufacturing.

422 Wholesale trade, nondurable

goods.

531 Real estate.

611 Educational services.

813 Religious, grant making,

civic, professional, and

similar organizations.

92 Public administration.

722 Food services and drinking

places. Any area source facility using

a boiler as defined in the

proposed rule.

62 Health care and social

assistance.

# 7 _ Based on the distribution of facilities in the boiler inspector inventory for thirteen states,

the EPA estimates that 49% of units are located in the private sector and 51 % of units are

located in the public sector.

4(b) Information Requested

(i) Data Items

In this ICR, all the data that is recorded or reported is required by 40 CFR part 63,

Subpart JJJJJJ.

In Attachment B, tables 1.A-C, 2.A-C, 3.A-C, 4.A-C, 5.A-C, 6.A -C, 7.A-C, and 8.A-C

present a summary of the testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements of the

Area Boilers NESHAP for each affected subcategory.

(ii) Respondent Activities

The respondent activities required by the Area Boilers NESHAP are provided under the

first column of tables 1.A-8.C. All respondent burden items are included in tables 1.A-8.C.

(iii) Summary of Requirements

The information collection activities in this ICR include initial and annual stack tests,

fuel analyses, one-time energy audits, biennial tune-ups, control device operating parameter

monitoring, continuous emission monitoring for CO at units equal to or greater than 100

mmBtu/hr, preparation of a startup, shutdown, malfunction plan (SSMP), preparation of a sitespecific monitoring plan and a site-specific fuel monitoring plan, one-time and periodic reports,

and the maintenance of records.

For sources that can demonstrate compliance through fuel analysis, the regulation

requires an initial fuel analysis and periodic fuel analyses every five years. Sources must

conduct additional fuel analyses if they burn a new type of fuel.

For sources that are required to perform an energy audit, the regulation requires an initial

report to be submitted to document the energy audit, detail the ways to improve efficiency, list

the cost and benefits of specific improvements, and the time frame for recouping those

investments.

For sources that can demonstrate compliance through biennial tune-ups, the regulation

requires the source to keep records of the tune-up. These records shall include the

concentrations of CO (ppmvd), percent oxygen (dry basis) before and after the tune-up

# 8 adjustments, and a description of any corrective actions taken as part of the tune-up.

For existing sources, an initial and annual performance test must be completed for Hg at

coal units and CO for coal, biomass and liquid units with applicable emission limits. For new

units, an initial and annual performance test must be completed for Hg at coal units and PM and

CO for coal, biomass and liquid units with applicable emission limits. During the initial

performance test, the owner or operator must establish maximum or minimum values for each

operating parameter. Thereafter, the owner or operator must, in some cases, conduct annual

stack tests for PM, CO, and Hg, and must continuously monitor the control device operating

parameters. Following the initial performance test, the owner or operator must submit a report

that documents the performance test results and the values for their required operating

parameters.

A semiannual report is required that documents the values for the operating parameters;

any deviation; the results of any annual stack tests; the results of any fuel analysis and emissions

calculations; fuel usage, and if no deviation occurred, a statement that no deviations occurred.

As specified in the Area Boilers NESHAP, owners or operators of boilers keep records of

certain parameters and information for a period of five years. Owners or operators must

maintain records of the initial performance test, audits, tune-ups, annual stack tests, fuel

analyses, and any subsequent stack tests or fuel analyses. Owners or operators must also

maintain records of the monitoring data for the operating parameters and daily fuel usage.

Owners or operators must also maintain records for boiler malfunctions and any

deviations from the operating parameters. Records must also be maintained of all monitoring

device calibration data.

5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and

Information Management

5(a) Agency Activities

A list of agency activities is provided in section 6(c) and in tables 9A-C (see Attachment B).

5(b) Collection Methodology and Management

Data obtained during periodic visits by EPA personnel, from records maintained by the

respondents, and from information provided in initial notifications and semiannual reports will

be tabulated and published for internal EPA use in compliance and enforcement programs. The

Area Boilers NESHAP allows records to be retained in hardcopy or electronic format to allow

flexibility and minimize burden.

Information contained in the reports is entered into the AFS which is operated and

# 9 maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance. AFS is EPA’s database for the collection,

maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and

government-owned facilities. EPA uses the AFS for tracking air pollution compliance and

enforcement by local and state regulatory agenci es, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters.

EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data.

The records required by this regulation must be retained by the owner/operator for five

years.

5(c) Small Entity Flexibility

The EPA expects the Area Boilers NESHAP to adversely affect small entities. In

developing the regulation, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business according to Small

Business Administration size standards by the NAICS category of the owning entity. The small

business size standard for manufacturing sectors in the expected industries potentially affected

by this rule is less than 500 employees. For trade sectors, the size standard is less than 100

employees; (2) A small organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise that is independently

owned and operated and is not dominant in its field. For non-profit and service industries the

small business size range for potentially affected sources is based on total sales of the entity,

which range from sales less than $10 to $50 million dollars; (3) A small governmental

jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town, school district or special district with a

population of less than 50,000.

The EPA has determined that there are approximately 182,671 existing affected sources

at 91,336 facilities. Of these affected units, the EPA has reduced testing, monitoring,

recordkeeping and reporting requirements for 169,403 units with design heat capacities less than

10 mmBtu/hr because the Agency found it is impracticable to enforce the emission standards for

these small units due to technical or economic limitations. Instead of requiring small sources to

conduct and submit stack test reports, the proposed rule requires small units to comply with the

rule by conducting a biennial tune-up and preparing a summary report of the procedures

followed during the tune-up. Based on the definiti on for sectors potentially affected by this rule,

EPA computed the overall share of small entities to the overall number of affected entities. The

overall share of small entities from manufacturing, trading, service, not-for-profit, and state,

local, and tribal governments is estimated to be 97 percent, or 177,191 existing units subject to

recordkeeping and reporting requirements. By reducing the requirements for small sources, the

EPA has substantially reduced the burden on small entities. Further, EPA is not requiring

MACT floor control for mercury from biomass and liquid units. This reduces the compliance,

testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements on nearly all units. Mercury

control testing and monitoring will be required at 573 large coal-fired boilers out of the 182,671

total boilers, but will be achieving 95 percent reduction of the estimated mercury emissions from

the entire source category. By not requiring MACT control for mercury from biomass and

liquid-fired units we are providing flexibility to over 99 percent of affected units, including the

small entities.

# 10 The Area Boilers NESHAP does not contain any provisions reserved exclusively for the

benefit of small entities. However, the regulation does contain several provisions that reduce the

impact on all regulated entities, which include small entities. For instance, operating parameter

monitoring is required instead of CEMS for units less than 100 mmBtu/hr. Additionally, the

alternative work practice standards provide for enhanced compliance flexibility and reduced

recordkeeping and reporting requirements for affected sources with small boilers.

5(d) Collection Schedule

Information collected includes the following one-time-only activities: reading the

regulation, initial performance tests (for PM, H g, and CO for units with applicable emission

limits), initial fuel analyses, setting of operating parameter values, report following initial stack

tests (includes operating parameter values), development of a SSMP, development of a sitespecific monitoring plan and fuel analysis plan, and conducting an energy audit. Compliance is

not required until year 3 for existing facilities. In order to ensure compliance by the compliance

date, EPA assumed that half of the exis ting facilities will conduct necessary compliance

activities such as energy audits in year 2 and the other half will conduct such activities in year 3.

Year 1 for new and existing sources includes the one-time activity of reading the

regulation and submitting the initial notification that the source is subject to the regulation. The

burden associated with this activity is estimated on a facility basis. The database of sources used

in the development of the Area Boilers NESHAP indicates that each affected facility has, on

average, two boilers. This is a conservative estimate of recordkeeping and reporting burden, as

EPA knows that some of the affected facilities have more than two sources and will be able to

benefit from consolidated reporting. During year 1, new sources would also submit a one-time

notification of compliance status.

Also in year 1, new facilities will begin activities to comply with the subpart such as

conducting performance tests, setting operating limits, developing a site-specific monitoring plan

and fuel analysis plan, installing and operating applicable monitoring equipment, and submitting

the notification of compliance status. New facilities will also submit semiannual compliance

reports and begin keeping records of all compliance activities.

In year 2, the new sources from year 1 will conduct annual performance tests, if

applicable, and submit semiannual compliance reports, and the new sources in year 2 will

conduct initial performance tests and fuel analyses, and submit all initial notifications and

semiannual compliance reports. Also in year 2, half of the existing affected sources will conduct

an energy audit, boiler tune-up, and initial performance tests, as applicable to each subcategory.

In year 3, the new sources from year 1 and from year 2 will conduct annual performance

tests, if applicable, and will submit semiannual compliance reports. The new sources from year 3

# 11 will conduct initial performance tests, fuel analyses, and submit all initial notifications and

semiannual compliance reports. Also in year 3, the remaining half of existing affected sources

will conduct an energy audit, initial compliance tests, and tune-ups. For all existing sources for

which an energy audit is required, the report from the energy audit and/or tune-up, and the initial

notification of compliance status will be submitted.

In year 1, new sources will begin keeping records of data such as operating limits, fuel

usage, and any reports submitted to EPA. In year 2, the new sources from years 1 and 2 will

keep records of such data. In year 3, all new and existing affected facilities that are subject to

recordkeeping requirements will keep records of such data.

6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection

Tables 1.A-8.A document the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping

and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this ICR. The

individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the

concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Where appropriate, specific tasks and

major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are

mandatory.

The Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a

collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.

6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden

The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these

recordkeeping and reporting requirements is estimated to be $551 million, including $336

million in labor costs and $215 million in non-labor capital/start-up and operation and

maintenance (O&M) costs. The average annual recordkeeping hours shown in Tables 1.A-8.C is

868,165. The average annual reporting requirement hours shown in Tables 1.A-8.C is 2.7

million. These hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the

development of the regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program,

and any comments received.

6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs

(i) Estimating Labor Costs

This ICR uses the following labor rates:

Managerial $114.49 ($54.52 + 110%)

Technical $98.20 ($46.76 + 110%)

# 12 Clerical $48.53 ($23.11 + 110%)

These rates are from the United States Depart ment of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,

September 2009, Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group. The rates are

from column 1, Total compensation. The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account

for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.

(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs

The type of industry costs associated with the information collection activities in the

subject standard(s) are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR and the costs

associated with continuous monitoring devices, hi ring third party contractors to perform stack

tests, energy audits, and/or boiler tune-ups. The capital/startup costs are one time costs when a

facility becomes subject to the regulation. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the

ongoing costs to maintain the monitor(s), conduct subsequent tests or tune-ups, and other costs

such as photocopying and postage.

(iii) Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs

Costs associated with O&M include the annual operation and maintenance costs

associated with the continuous parameter monitoring equipment, initial and annual stack and

performance testing and/or fuel analysis, and certified energy audits and/or tune-ups. Below is

the estimated total annualized capital and startup costs and O&M costs for the affected units for

the first 3 years after promulgation.

The total capital/startup costs for this ICR are $337.7 million for the three years

following promulgation. This is the total of column D in the table below. This reflects the initial

costs to purchase monitoring equipment.

The total annualized capital/startup and O&M costs for this ICR are $644.6 million, or an

average of $215 million per year. These are recordkeeping costs. This reflects the capital

recovery of purchasing the monitoring equipment, costs to operate the monitoring equipment,

and fees paid to third parties to conduct initial and annual stack testing, biennial tune-ups, and

one-time energy audits at facilities with large boilers.

# 13 Table 2: Capital/Start-up vs. O&M Costs

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)

Boiler Type Number of

Respondents

(facilities) Total Annualized

Capital/Startup and

O&M over 3 years Total

Capital/Startup Cost

over 3 years Average Annual O&M

and Annualized

Capital/Startup Costs per

year

Existing

Large Solid

Units 4,039 $ 57,986,012 $ 15,934,200 $ 19,328,671

New Large

Solid Units 60 $ 5,490,000 $ 8,240,400 $ 1,830,000

Existing

Small Solid

Units 10,629 $ 23,683,640 $ - $ 7,894,547

New Small

Solid Units 295 $ 14,229,600 $ 12,714,500 $ 4,743,200

Existing

Large

Liquid Units 9,229 $ 86,021,694 $ 22,526,000 $ 28,673,898

New Large

Liquid Units 487 $ 20,642,400 $ 20,154,600 $ 6,880,800

Existing

Small

Liquid Units 158,774 $ 176,875,350 $ - $ 58,958,450

New Small

Liquid Units 5,937 $ 259,674,000 $ 258,096,600 $ 86,558,000

TOTAL 189,450 $ 644,602,696 $ 337,666,300 $ 214,867,565



# 6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost

The only costs to the Agency are those costs associated with analysis of the reported

information. EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program includes activities such as the

examination of records maintained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of

emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information.

The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be

$37.6 million.

This cost is based on the average hourly labor rate as follows:

Managerial $62.27 (GS-13, Step 5, $38.92 + 60%)

Technical $46.21 (GS-12, Step 1, $28.88 + 60%)

# 14 Clerical $25.01 (GS-6, Step 3, $15.63 + 60%)

These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2010 General Schedule,

which excludes locality rates of pay. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for

the benefit packages available to government employees.

6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs

The total number of respondents is referred to as the respondent universe. The

respondent universe for this ICR is based on the EPA’s database of industrial, commercial, and

institutional boilers at area source facilities. For a description of how EPA estimated the number

of affected sources, see memorandum entitled “Development of Model Units for the Area Source

Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air

Pollutants.”

Based on data available from state boiler inspector databases, the EPA estimates there are

approximately 21.97 million existing boilers at area source facilities nationwide. Further, the

EPA estimates the Area Boilers NESHAP to affect approximately 182,671 of these units. The

remaining boilers at area sources of HAP are gas-fired boilers and not covered under the

proposed rulemaking. The industry burden for existing units is based on these 182,671 units.

An additional 6,779 solid and liquid fuel boilers at area source facilities are expected to

be constructed in the 3 years after promulgation of this rule, or 2,260 new boilers per year.

The respondent universe is 189,450 units, which is the total of all existing and new units

through the first three years after promulgations of this rule. Many of these units have reduced

reporting requirements (i.e., biennial records and reports to the Administrator upon request). A

table showing the estimated number of sources for each category is shown below.

Table 3: Number of Responses for New and Existing Units

(A) (B) (C) (D)*

Boiler Type Number of

Respondents

(facilities) Total Number

Responses for 3-year

Period Average Annual

Number of Responses

Existing

Large Solid

Units 2,020 10,100 3,367

New Large

Solid Units 30 240 80

Existing

Small Solid 5,315 13,288 4,429

# 15 Units

New Small

Solid Units 148 1,182 394

Existing

Large Liquid

Units 4,615 23,075 7,692

New Large

Liquid Units 244 1,950 650

Existing

Small Liquid

Units 79,387 198,468 66,156

New Small

Liquid Units 2,969 23,756 7,919

* Some responses are one-time only requirements and do not occur each year. Initial one-time requirements are

included in the annual average for this intial 3-year ICR period.



# 6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables

The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the

Agency are shown in Tables 1.A-8.C and 9.A-9.C in Appendix A and B respectively, and

summarized below.

(i) Respondent Tally

A breakdown for each of the collection, reporting, and recordkeeping activities required

by the Area Boilers NESHAP is presented in tables 1.A-8.C. The estimate of total annual hours

requested from the respondents is based on the assumptions outlined in section 6(d) of this

supporting statement. The EPA estimates the respondent burden by totaling the hours for the

first 3 years after the implementation of the Area Boilers NESHAP for technical, managerial,

and clerical staff at the facility, and for the labor hours of the contractors doing the performance

testing. This total is divided by three to arrive at the average annualized burden (see ICRAS

summary table 10). A similar approach is taken for estimating average annual labor and nonlabor costs. For the first 3 years after the implementation of the Area Boilers NESHAP, EPA

estimates that industry would expend 3.6 million hours annually at a cost of $551 million per

year to meet the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements. Excluding labor costs,

the annualized capital/startup and O&M is expected to be $215 million. The annualized

capital/startup and O&M costs for the respondents includes the cost of monitoring equipment,

and cost to hire third parties to conduct audits, testing, and tune-ups. These testing, monitoring,

audit, and tune-up costs are also included in the total control cost impacts estimated for the Area

Boilers NESHAP such that adding these burden estimates to the total cost of the regulation

would overestimate the total costs incurred by affected sources.

# 16 Table 4: Annual Average Burden for all Affected Boilers

Total Recordkeeping and Reporting Costs

Number of

Responses Annual Burden Hours Annualized Capital/Start-up

and O&M

Year 1 98,117 4,899,304 $ 34,089,400

Year 2 9,040 1,467,635 $ 264,809,555

Year 3 164,901 4,349,439 $ 345,703,741

Overall Average Annual

Estimates 90,686 3,572,126 $ 214,867,565



# (ii) The Agency Tally

The bottom line agency burden hours and costs, presented in table 5 below and in

Attachments 9A-9C, are calculated by totaling the hours per year for technical, managerial, and

clerical staff, and by totaling the cost column. The table summarizes the agency burden for each

of the first 3 years and calculates the average annual burden by dividing the 3-year total by three.

The estimated average annual burden over the first 3 years for the agency is 767,400 hours at a

cost of $37.6 million (including travel expenses for observing stack tests) per year.

Table 5: Annual Average Burden for the Federal Government

AGENCY Burden Hours Costs (labor + travel)

Year 1 707,354 $ 33,394,953

Year 2 479,994 $ 25,410,475

Year 3 1,114,861 $ 54,022,261

Total 2,302,208 $ 112,827,689

Annual Average 767,403 $ 37,609,230

_ 

# 6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden

This is the initial estimation of burden for this ICR, therefore, this section does not apply.

6(g) Burden Statement

The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information

is estimated to average 39.4 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial

resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information

to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop,

acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and

# 17 verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing

information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and

requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data

sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose

the information.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a

collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control

Numbers for EPA regulations are listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided

burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the

use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under

Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0790. An el ectronic version of the public docket is

available at http://www.regulations.gov/ which may be used to obtain a copy of the draft

collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the

contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available

electronically. When in the system, select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified

in this document. The documents are also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and

Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West,

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public

Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal

holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone

number for the docket center is (202) 566-1927. Also, you can send comments to the Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW,

Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer fo r EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID

Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0790 in any correspondence.

Part B of the Supporting Statement

This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this

information.ICRAS SUMMARYAnnual BurdenHoursNumber of Respondents(Facilities)Number ofResponsesAnnualized Capital/Start-upand O&MAnnual Burden HoursNumber ofResponsesAnnual BurdenHoursAnnualized Capital/Startup and O&MYear 14,671,83092,46798,11734,089,400227,473Year 198,1174,899,30434,089,400$Year 2932,9102,2609,040264,809,555534,725Year 29,0401,467,635264,809,555$Year 32,507,14194,729164,901345,703,7411,842,297Year 3164,9014,349,439345,703,741$Overall Average Annual Estimates2,703,96163,15290,686214,867,565868,165Overall Average Annual Estimates90,6863,572,126214,867,565$Avg. Cost per Response2,369$Avg. Burden Hours per Response29.829.5733ALL SECTORSPrivate SectorPublic SectorPaperwork Preamble SUMMARY- Industry3-year totalannual averageannual averageannual averageTotal HOURS10,716,3773,572,1261,750,3421,821,784TOTAL COSTS (non-labor)644,602,696$214,867,565$105,285,107$109,582,458$Total LABOR COSTS1,009,448,122$336,482,707$164,876,527$171,606,181$TOTAL LABOR AND NON-Labor COSTS1,654,050,818$551,350,273$270,161,634$281,188,639$Small Entity Respondents per year30,01631,241Total Respondents per year30,94432,207AGENCY BurdenHoursCosts (labor + travel)Year 1707,35433,394,953$Year 2479,99425,410,475$Year 31,114,86154,022,261$Total2,302,208112,827,689$Annual Average767,40337,609,230$ReportingRecordkeepingTotal Recordkeeping and Reporting CostsBurden Item(A) RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B) CertifiedEnergy AuditCost perOccurrence(C) StackTesting andFuel AnalysisCost PerOccurrence(D) OtherNon-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(E) Number ofOccurrences PerRespondent PerYear\(F) TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year(A X E)(G) Number ofRespondents PerYear(H)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (F XG)(I)ClericalHours perYear @$48.53 (H X0.1)(J)Management Hours perYear @$114.49 (HX .05)(K) Total LaborCosts Per Year(L) Total Non-LaborCapital Costs(M) Total Non-LaborAnnual Costs(N) TotalNumber ofResponses perYear (E X G) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements 40 $0 $0 $0 1 40 2,020 80,780 8,078 4,039 $8,787,046 $0 $0 aB. Required Activities1. Conduct Energy Audita) Industria20$18,292$0$01200000$0$0$0b, c, db) Commercial20$854$0$01200000$0$0$0b, c, d2. Initial Stack Test and Report (for Hg)12$0$5,000 $01120000$0$0$0c3. Initial Performance Test and Report (for CO)12$0$6,000 $01120000$0$0$0c,h4. Annual Stack Test and Report (for Hg)12$0$5,000 $01120000$0$0$0c5. Annual Performance Test and Report (for CO)12$0$6,000 $01120000$0$0$0c,h6. Initial Fuel Analysis for Mercury Conten5$0$200 $0150000$0$0$0g7. Monthly Fuel Analysis for Mercury Content5$0$200 $012600000$0$0$0c,g8. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoring plan (all)40$0$0$01400000$0$0$0cCO (only sources greater than 100 mmBtu/hr)a) initia10$0$0 $160,900 1100000$0$0$0c,fb) annua10$0$0 $53,600 1100000$0$0$0cBag Leak Detection System Operation(all sources that have fabric filters)a) initia10$0$0 $25,500 1100000$0$0$0cb) annua10$0$0 $9,700 1100000$0$0$0cC. Create InformationnaD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparation1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject2$0$0$0122,020 4,039 404 202 $439,352$0$02,020 a2) Notification of Compliance Status8$0$0$0180000$0$0$00c3) Initial Report on results of Energy Audit5$0$0$0150000$0$0$00 b, c, d4) Semi-annual Compliance Report20$0$0$02400000$0$0$00aReporting Subtotal84,819 8,482 4,241 9,226,399002,020 i4. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read InstructionsIncluded in 3aB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record System naeD. Record Information1) Records of Operating Parameter Values 20 $0 $0 $0 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 c2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction15$0$0$01150000$0$0$00c3) Records of Stack Tests2$0$0$0120000$0$0$00c4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations2$0$0$0120000$0$0$00c5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted2$0$0$0240000$0$0$00c6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use0.5$0$0$01260000$0$0$00 c,gE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaRecordkeeping Subtotal0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 iTotals84,819 8,482 4,241 $9,226,399 $0 $0 2,020a Number of respondents based on number of existing large solid fuel boilers which includes biomass and coal units greater than 10 mmBtu/hr (assumption of 2 units per facility).e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required.g Existing large solid units are expected to determine compliance through stack testing and not fuel analysish Only units between 10 and 100 mmBtu/hr are expected to perform stack testing for CO. Units greater than 100 mmBtu/hr will be equipped with a continuous CO monitori The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotalf Only the number of new large solid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrations.Table 1.A. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers - Year 1, Existing Large Solid Fuel Unitsd Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. Cost depends on whether the source is industrial or commercial. It is assumed that 10%will be industrial and 90% will be commercial sources. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals.b Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from the audit professional.c Since existing units have three years after the publication date of the final rule to submit initial notification of compliance status, conduct compliance activities, or meet recordkeeping or reporting requirements, no burden is assumed in year 1.Burden Item(A) RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B) CertifiedEnergy AuditCost perOccurrence(C) StackTesting and FueAnalysis CostPer Occurrence(D) OtherNon-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(E) Number ofOccurrences PerRespondent PerYear\(F) TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year(A X E)(G) Number ofRespondents PerYear(H)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (F XG)(I)ClericalHours perYear @$48.53 (H X0.1)(J)Management Hours perYear @$114.49 (HX .05)(K) Total LaborCosts Per Year(L) Total NonLabor CapitalCosts(M) Total NonLabor AnnualCosts(N) TotalNumber ofResponses perYear (E X G) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements40$0$0$01400000$0$0$0aB. Required Activities1. Conduct Energy Audita) Industrial20$18,292$0$01202024,040 404 202 $439,461$0$3,694,984b, c, db) Commercial20$854$0$01201,818 36,360 3,636 1,818 $3,955,150$0$1,552,572b, c, d2. Initial Stack Test and Report (for Hg)12$0$5,000 $01122873,444 344 172 $374,630$0$1,435,000c3. Initial Performance Test and Report (for CO)12$0$6,000 $01121,996 23,952 2,395 1,198 $2,605,439$0$11,976,000c,h4. Annual Stack Test and Report (for Hg)12$0$5,000 $01120000$0$0$0c5. Annual Performance Test and Report (for CO)12$0$6,000 $01120000$0$0$0c,h6. Initial Fuel Analysis for Mercury Content5$0$200 $0150000$0$1$0g7. Monthly Fuel Analysis for Mercury Content5$0$200 $012600000$0$0$0c,g8. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoring plan (all)40$0$0$01401,010 40,400 4,040 2,020 $4,394,611$0$0cCO (only sources greater than 100 mmBtu/hr)a) initial10$0$0 $160,900 11024240 24 12 $26,107 $3,861,600 $3,861,600c,fb) annual10$0$0 $53,600 11024240 24 12 $26,107$0$1,286,400cBag Leak Detection System Operation(all sources that have fabric filters)a) initial10$0$0 $25,500 1101611,610 161 81 $175,132 $4,105,500 $4,105,500cb) annual10$0$0 $9,700 1101611,610 161 81 $175,132$0$1,561,700cC. Create InformationnaD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparation1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject2$0$0$0120000$0$0$00 a2) Notification of Compliance Status8$0$0$0180000$0$0$00 c3) Initial Report on results of Energy Audit5$0$0$0150000$0$0$00 b, c, d4) Semi-annual Compliance Report20$0$0$02400000$0$0$00 cReporting Subtotal67,796 6,780 3,390 7,374,679118,658,5560i4. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read InstructionsIncluded in 3aB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaeD. Record Information1) Records of Operating Parameter Values20$0$0$01200000$0$0$00 c2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction15$0$0$01150000$0$0$00 c3) Records of Stack Tests2$0$0$0120000$0$0$00 c4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations2$0$0$0120000$0$0$00 c5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted2$0$0$0240000$0$0$00 c6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use0.5$0$0$01260000$0$0$00 c,gE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaRecordkeeping Subtotal44,100 4,410 2,205 $4,797,088 $7,967,100 $10,815,2000iTotals111,896 11,190 5,595 $12,171,767 $7,967,101 $29,473,7560a The burden on existing sources to read and understand rule requirements, and submit an initial notification were assumed to all occur in year 1.e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required.g Existing large solid units are expected to determine compliance through stack testing and not fuel analysish Only units between 10 and 100 mmBtu/hr are expected to perform stack testing for CO. Units greater than 100 mmBtu/hr will be equipped with a continuous CO monitori The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotalj Only coal boilers are subject to numerical mercury limits and are required to test for mercury.f Only the number of new large solid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrations.Table 1.B. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers - Year 2, Existing Large Solid Fuel Unitsd Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. Cost depends on whether the source is industrial or commercial. It is assumed that 10%will be industrial and 90% will be commercial sources. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals.b Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from the audit professional.c Since existing units have three years after the publication date of the final rule to submit initial notification of compliance status, conduct compliance activities, or meet recordkeeping or reporting requirements, it is assumed that half the affected units will conduct an audit, testingand monitoring plan development in year 2 and half will conduct them in year 3 in order to be in compliance by the third year after promulgation. Initial Notification of Compliance Reports and recordkeeping requirements will not begin until year 3 of this ICR.Burden Item(A) RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B) CertifiedEnergy AuditCost perOccurrence(C) StackTesting and FueAnalysis CostPer Occurrence(D) OtherNon-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(E) Number ofOccurrences PerRespondent PerYear\(F) TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year(A X E)(G) Number ofRespondents PerYear(H)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (F XG)(I)ClericalHours perYear @$48.53 (H X0.1)(J)Management Hours perYear @$114.49 (HX .05)(K) Total LaborCosts Per Year(L) Total NonLabor CapitalCosts(M) Total NonLabor AnnualCosts(N) TotalNumber ofResponses perYear (E X G) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements40$0$0$01400000$0$0$0aB. Required Activities1. Conduct Energy Audita) Industrial20$18,292$0$01202024,040 404 202 $439,461$0$3,694,984b, c, db) Commercial20$854$0$01201,818 36,360 3,636 1,818 $3,955,150$0$1,552,572b, c, d2. Initial Stack Test and Report (for Hg)12$0$5,000 $01122873,444 344 172 $374,630$0$1,435,000c, j3. Initial Performance Test and Report (for CO)12$0$6,000 $01121,996 23,952 2,395 1,198 $2,605,439$0$11,976,000c,h4. Annual Stack Test and Report (for Hg)12$0$5,000 $01122873,444 344 172 $374,630$0$1,435,000c, j5. Annual Performance Test and Report (for CO)12$0$6,000 $01121,996 23,952 2,395 1,198 $2,605,439$0$11,976,000c,h6. Initial Fuel Analysis for Mercury Content5$0$200 $0150000$0$1$0g7. Monthly Fuel Analysis for Mercury Content5$0$200 $012600000$0$0$0c,g8. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoring plan (all)40$0$01401,010 40,400 4,040 2,020 $4,394,611$0$0cCO (only sources greater than 100 mmBtu/hr)a) initial10$0$0 $160,900 11024240 24 12 $26,107 $3,861,600 $3,861,600c,fb) annual10$0$0 $53,600 11024240 24 12 $26,107$0$1,286,400cBag Leak Detection System Operation(all sources that have fabric filters)a) initial10$0$0 $25,500 1101611,610 161 81 $175,132 $4,105,500 $4,105,500cb) annual10$0$0 $9,700 1103223,220 322 161 $350,264$0$3,123,400cC. Create InformationnaD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparation1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject2$0$0$0120000$0$0$00a2) Notification of Compliance Status8$0$0$0182,020 16,160 1,616 808 $1,757,844$0$02,020 c3) Initial Report on results of Energy Audit5$0$0$0152,020 10,100 1,010 505 $1,098,653$0$02,020 b,c,d4) Semi-annual Compliance Report20$0$0$02402,020 80,800 8,080 4,040 $8,789,222$0$04,040 cReporting Subtotal202,252 20,225 10,113 22,000,467132,069,556 8,080 i4. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read InstructionsIncluded in 3aB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaeD. Record Information1) Records of Operating Parameter Values20$0$0$01204,039 80,780 8,078 4,039 $8,787,046$0$04,039 c2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction15$0$0$01154,039 60,585 6,059 3,029 $6,590,285$0$04,039 c3) Records of Stack Tests2$0$0$0124,039 8,078 808 404 $878,705$0$04,039 c4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations2$0$0$0124,039 8,078 808 404 $878,705$0$04,039 c5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted2$0$0$0242,020 8,080 808 404 $878,922$0$04,040 c6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use0.5$0$0$01264,039 24,234 2,423 1,212 $2,636,114$0$048,468 c,gE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaRecordkeeping Subtotal235,545 23,555 11,777 $25,621,996 $7,967,100 $12,376,900 68,664 iTotals437,797 43,780 21,890 $47,622,463 $7,967,101 $44,446,456 76,744a The burden on existing sources to read and understand rule requirements, and submit an initial notification were assumed to all occur in year 1.e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required.g Existing large solid units are expected to determine compliance through stack testing and not fuel analysish Only units between 10 and 100 mmBtu/hr are expected to perform stack testing for CO. Units greater than 100 mmBtu/hr will be equipped with a continuous CO monitori The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotalj Only coal boilers are subject to numerical mercury limits and are required to test for mercury.f Only the number of new large solid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrations.Table 1.C. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers - Year 3, Existing Large Solid Fuel Unitsd Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. Cost depends on whether the source is industrial or commercial. It is assumed that 10%be industrial and 90% will be commercial sources. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals.b Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from the audit professional.c Since existing units have three years after the publication date of the final rule to submit initial notification of compliance status, conduct compliance activities, or meet recordkeeping or reporting requirements, it is assumed that half the affected units will conduct an audit, testingand monitoring plan development in year 2 and half will conduct them in year 3 in order to be in compliance by the third year after promulgation. Initial Notification of Compliance Reports and recordkeeping requirements will not begin until year 3 of this ICR.Burden Item(A) RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B) CertifiedEnergy AuditCost perOccurrence(C) StackTesting andFuel AnalysisCost PerOccurrence(D) OtherNon-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(E) Number ofOccurrencesPer RespondentPer Year\(F) TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year(A X E)(G) Number ofRespondentsPer Year(H)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (F XG)(I)ClericalHours perYear @$48.53 (HX 0.1)(J)Management Hours perYear @$114.49 (HX .05)(K) Total LaborCosts Per Year(L) Total NonLabor CapitalCosts(M) Total NonLabor AnnualCosts(N) TotalNumber ofResponses perYear (E X G) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements 40 $0 $0 $0 1 40 4,615 184,600 18,460 9,230 $20,080,327 $0 $0 aB. Required Activities1. Conduct Energy Audita) Industrial 20 $18,292 $0 $0 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 b, c, db) Commercial 20 $854 $0 $0 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 b, c, d2. Initial Performance Test and Report (for CO) 12 $0 $6,000 $0 1 12 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 c,h3. Annual Performance Test and Report (for CO) 12 $0 $6,000 $0 1 12 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 c,h4. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoring plan (all) 40 $0 $0 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 cCO (only sources greater than 100 mmBtu/hr)a) initial 10 $0 $0 $160,900 1 10 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 c,fb) annual10$0$0 $53,600 1100000$0$0$0cC. Create InformationnaD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparation1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject2$0$0$0124,615 9,230 923 462 $1,004,016$0$04,615 a2) Notification of Compliance Status8$0$0$0180000$0$0$00c3) Initial Report on results of Energy Audit5$0$0$0150000$0$0$00c4) Semi-annual Compliance Report20$0$0$02400000$0$0$00aReporting Subtotal193,830 19,383 9,692 21,084,343004,615 i4. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read InstructionsIncluded in 3aB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaeD. Record Information1) Records of Operating Parameter Values20$0$0$01200000$0$0$00c2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction15$0$0$01150000$0$0$00c3) Records of Stack Tests2$0$0$0120000$0$0$00 c,g4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations2$0$0$0120000$0$0$00c5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted2$0$0$0240000$0$0$00c6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use0.5$0$0$01260000$0$0$00cE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaRecordkeeping Subtotal000$0$0$00iTotals193,830 19,383 9,692 $21,084,343$0$04,615a Number of respondents based on number of existing large liquid fuel boilers which includes biomass and coal units greater than 10 mmBtu/hr (assumption of 2 units per facility).e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required.g Existing large liquid units are expected to determine compliance through fuel analysis instead of stack testingh Only units greater than 100 mmBtu/hr will be equipped with a continuous CO monitori The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotalf Only the number of existing large liquid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrations.Table 2.A. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers - Year 1, Existing Large Liquid Fuel Unitsd Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. Cost depends on whether the source is industrial or commercial. It is assumed that 10%will be industrial and 90% will be commercial sources. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals.b Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from the audit professional.c Since existing units have three years after the publication date of the final rule to submit initial notification of compliance status, conduct compliance activities, or meet recordkeeping or reporting requirements, no burden is assumed in year 1.Burden Item(A) RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B) CertifiedEnergy AuditCost perOccurrence(C) StackTesting andFuel AnalysisCost PerOccurrence(D) OtherNon-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(E) Number ofOccurrencesPer RespondentPer Year\(F) TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year(A X E)(G) Number ofRespondentsPer Year(H)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (F XG)(I)ClericalHours perYear @$48.53 (HX 0.1)(J)Management Hours perYear @$114.49 (HX .05)(K) Total LaborCosts Per Year(L) Total NonLabor CapitalCosts(M) Total NonLabor AnnualCosts(N) Total Numberof Responses perYear (E X G) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements 40 $0 $0 $0 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 aB. Required Activities1. Conduct Energy Audita) Industrial 20 $18,292 $0 $0 1 20 462 9,230 923 462 $1,004,016 $0 $8,441,758 b, c, db) Commercial 20 $854 $0 $0 1 20 4,154 83,070 8,307 4,154 $9,036,147 $0 $3,547,089 b, c, d2. Initial Performance Test and Report (for CO) 12 $0 $6,000 $0 1 12 4,545 54,540 5,454 2,727 $5,932,725 $0 $27,270,000 c,h3. Annual Performance Test and Report (for CO) 12 $0 $6,000 $0 1 12 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 c,h4. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoring plan (all) 40 $0 $0 1 40 2,307 92,280 9,228 4,614 $10,037,988 $0 $0 cCO (only sources greater than 100 mmBtu/hr)a) initial 10 $0 $0 $160,900 1 10 70 700 70 35 $76,144 $11,263,000 $11,263,000 c,fb) annual10$0$0 $53,600 11070700 70 35 $76,144$0$3,752,000cC. Create InformationnaD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparation1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject2$0$0$0120000$0$0$00a2) Notification of Compliance Status8$0$0$0180000$0$0$00c3) Initial Report on results of Energy Audit5$0$0$0150000$0$0$00c4) Semi-annual Compliance Report20$0$0$02400000$0$0$00aReporting Subtotal146,840 14,684 7,342 15,972,888039,258,8470i4. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read InstructionsIncluded in 3aB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaeD. Record Information1) Records of Operating Parameter Values20$0$0$01200000$0$0$00c2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction15$0$0$01150000$0$0$00c3) Records of Stack Tests2$0$0$0120000$0$0$00c,g4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations2$0$0$0120000$0$0$00c5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted2$0$0$0240000$0$0$00c6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use0.5$0$0$01260000$0$0$00cE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaRecordkeeping Subtotal93,680 9,368 4,684 $10,190,276 $11,263,000 $15,015,0000iTotals240,520 24,052 12,026 $26,163,164 $11,263,000 $54,273,8470a The burden on existing sources to read and understand rule requirements, and submit an initial notification were assumed to all occur in year 1.e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required.g Existing large liquid units are expected to determine compliance with the mercury limit through fuel analysis not stack testingh Only units between 10 and 100 mmBtu/hr are expected to perform stack testing for CO. Units greater than 100 mmBtu/hr will be equipped with a continuous CO monitori The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotalf Only the number of new large liquid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrations.Table 2.B. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers - Year 2, Existing Large Liquid Fuel Unitsd Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. Cost depends on whether the source is industrial or commercial. It is assumed that 10%will be industrial and 90% will be commercial sources. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals.b Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from the audit professional.c Since existing units have three years after the publication date of the final rule to submit initial notification of compliance status, conduct compliance activities, or meet recordkeeping or reporting requirements, it is assumed that half the affected units will conduct anaudit, testing and monitoring plan development in year 2 and half will conduct them in year 3 in order to be in compliance by the third year after promulgation. Initial Notification of Compliance Reports and recordkeeping requirements will not begin until year 3 of this ICR.Burden Item(A) RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B) CertifiedEnergy AuditCost perOccurrence(C) StackTesting andFuel AnalysisCost PerOccurrence(D) OtherNon-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(E) Number ofOccurrencesPer RespondentPer Year\(F) TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year(A X E)(G) Number ofRespondentsPer Year(H)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (F XG)(I)ClericalHours perYear @$48.53 (HX 0.1)(J)Management Hours perYear @$114.49 (HX .05)(K) Total LaborCosts Per Year(L) Total NonLabor CapitalCosts(M) Total NonLabor AnnualCosts(N) Total Numberof Responses perYear (E X G) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements 40 $0 $0 $0 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 aB. Required Activities1. Conduct Energy Audita) Industrial 20 $18,292 $0 $0 1 20 462 9,230 923 462 $1,004,016 $0 $8,441,758 b, c, db) Commerical 20 $854 $0 $0 1 20 4,154 83,070 8,307 4,154 $9,036,147 $0 $3,547,089 b, c, d2. Initial Performance Test and Report (for CO) 12 $0 $6,000 $0 1 12 4,545 54,540 5,454 2,727 $5,932,725 $0 $27,270,000 c,h3. Annual Performance Test and Report (for CO) 12 $0 $6,000 $0 1 12 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 c,h4. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoring plan (all) 40 $0 $0 1 40 2,307 92,280 9,228 4,614 $10,037,988 $0 $0 cCO (only sources greater than 100 mmBtu/hr)a) initial 10 $0 $0 $160,900 1 10 70 700 70 35 $76,144 $11,263,000 $11,263,000 c,fb) annual10$0$0 $53,600 11070700 70 35 $76,144$0$3,752,000cC. Create InformationnaD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparation1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject2$0$0$0120000$0$0$00a2) Notification of Compliance Status8$0$0$0184,615 36,920 3,692 1,846 $4,016,065$0$04,615 c3) Initial Report on results of Energy Audit5$0$0$0154,615 23,075 2,308 1,154 $2,510,041$0$04,615 c4) Semi-annual Compliance Report20$0$0$02404,615 184,600 18,460 9,230 $20,080,327 $0$09,230 aReporting Subtotal391,435 39,144 19,572 42,579,321039,258,847 18,460 i4. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read InstructionsIncluded in 3aB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaeD. Record Information1) Records of Operating Parameter Values20$0$0$01209,229 184,580 18,458 9,229 $20,078,151 $0$09,229 c2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction15$0$0$01159,229 138,435 13,844 6,922 $15,058,613 $0$09,229 c3) Records of Stack Tests2$0$0$0129,229 18,458 1,846 923 $2,007,815$0$09,229 c,g4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations2$0$0$0129,229 18,458 1,846 923 $2,007,815$0$09,229 c5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted2$0$0$0244,615 18,460 1,846 923 $2,008,033$0$09,230 c6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use0.5$0$0$01269,229 55,374 5,537 2,769 $6,023,445$0$0110,748 cE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaRecordkeeping Subtotal527,445 52,745 26,372 $57,374,148 $11,263,000 $15,015,000 156,894 iTotals918,880 91,888 45,944 $99,953,469 $11,263,000 $54,273,847 175,354a The burden on existing sources to read and understand rule requirements, and submit an initial notification were assumed to all occur in year 1.e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required.g Existing large liquid units are expected to determine compliance with the mercury limit through fuel analysis not stack testingh Only units between 10 and 100 mmBtu/hr are expected to perform stack testing for CO. Units greater than 100 mmBtu/hr will be equipped with a continous CO monitori The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotalf Only the number of new large liquid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrations.Table 2.C. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers - Year 3, Existing Large Liquid Fuel Unitsd Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. Cost depends on whether the source is industrial or commerical. It is assumed that 10%will be industrial and 90% will be commerical sources. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals.b Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from the audit professional.c Since existing units have three years after the publication date of the final rule to submit initial notification of compliance status, conduct compliance activities, or meet recordkeeping or reporting requirements, it is assumed that half the affected units will conduct anaudit, testing and monitoring plan development in year 2 and half will conduct them in year 3 in order to be in compliance by the third year after promulgation. Initial Notification of Compliance Reports and recordkeeping requirements will not begin until year 3 of this ICR.Burden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B)StackTesting andFuel AnalysisCost PerOccurrence(C)Non-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(D)Number ofOccurrencesPerRespondentPer Year(E)TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year (AX D)(F)Number ofRespondentsPer Year(G)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (FX G)(H)ClericalHoursper Year@$48.53(H X 0.1)(I)ManagementHoursper Year@$114.49(H X .05)(J)Total LaborCosts Per Year(K)Total NonLabor CapitalCost(L)Total NonLabor AnnualCost(M) TotalNumber ofResponses perYear (D X F) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements40$0$014010 400 40 20 $43,511$0$0a, bB. Required Activities1. Initial Stack Test and Report (for PM)12 $8,000 $0112448 5 2 $5,221 $32,000 $0b, c2. Initial Stack Test and Report (for Hg)12 $5,000 $011200 0 0$0$0$0b, c, j3. Initial Performance Test and Report (for CO)12 $6,000 $0112448 5 2 $5,221 $24,000 $0b, d4. Annual Stack Test and Report (for PM)12 $8,000 $011200 0 0$0$0$0e5. Annual Stack Test and Report (for Hg)12 $5,000 $011200 0 0$0$0$0b, c, j6. Annual Performance Test and Report (for CO)12 $6,000 $011200 0 0$0$0$0d, e7. Initial Fuel Analysis for Mercury Content5 $200 $01500 0 0$0$0$0b, c8. Monthly Fuel Analysis for Mercury Content5 $200 $0126000 0 0$0$0$0c, e9. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoring plan (all)40$0$014010 400 40 20 $43,511$0$0fOpacitya) initial10$0 $43,100 110440 4 2 $4,351 $172,400 $172,400hb) annual10$0 $14,700 110440 4 2 $4,351$0 $58,800hCO (only sources greater than 100 mmBtu/hr)a) initial10$0 $160,900 11016 160 16 8 $17,404 $2,574,400 $2,574,400gb) annual10$0 $53,600 11016 160 16 8 $17,404$0 $857,600gBag Leak Detection System Operation(all sources that have fabric filters)a) initial10$0 $25,500 11000 0 0$0$0$0hb) annual10$0 $9,700 11000 0 0$0$0$0hC. Create InformationnaD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparation1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject2$0$0121020 2 1 $2,176$0$010 a, b2) Notification of Initial Stack Test8$0$0181080 8 4 $8,702$0$010 a, b3) Report Established Values for Site-specificOperating Parameters (all)see 3.E.64) Notification of Compliance Status40$0$014010 400 40 20 $43,511$0$010 a, b5) Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction Plan40$0$014010 400 40 20 $43,511$0$010 a, b6) Semi-annual Compliance Report20$0$024010 400 40 20 $43,511$0$020aReporting Subtotal1,796 180 90 $195,364 $56,000 $060i4. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read Instructionssee 3.AB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record System naD. Record Information1) Records of Operating Parameter Values20$0$012020 400 40 20 $43,511$0$020a2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction15$0$011520 300 30 15 $32,633$0$020a3) Records of Stack Tests2$0$0122040 4 2 $4,351$0$020a4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations2$0$0121632 3 2 $3,481$0$016g5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted2$0$0242080 8 4 $8,702$0$040a6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use0.5$0$012620 120 12 6 $13,053$0$0240 aE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaSubtotal Recordkeeping1,772 177 89 $192,754 $2,746,800 $3,663,200 356 iTotals3,568 357 178 $388,118 $2,802,800 $3,663,200 416b A one-time requirement.i The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotalj Only coal boilers are subject to numerical mercury limits and are required to test for mercury. No new large coal units are projected.Table 3.A. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsh All new coal units greater than 10 mmBtu/hr are expected to install fabric filters and equipped with bag leak detection (BLD) systems instead of opacity monitors. Since biomass units are expected to meet PM limits with an ESP, an opacity monitor is required instead of a BLD.There are no new large coal units projected to be installed.d All new large solid fuel units must conduct an initial test for CO, see note a for the derivation of the number of units per year.e No annual test and reporting burden is shown in year 1 as this is the same year as the initial test and report.for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters - Year 1, New Large Solid Fuel Unitsc This NESHAP provides a compliance option to conduct a fuel analysis once every five years, if a unit burns the same kind of fuel, or re-conduct a fuel analysis if a unit changes fuel type. All projected large solid fuel units expected to comply through stack testing instead of thefuel testing compliance option, see note a for the derivation of the number of units per year. Only units less than 30 mmBtu/hr that are not subject to PM limits under the NSPS (40 CFR part 60 subparts Db, Dc) will incur additional testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reportingcosts under this rule.a The total number of new large solid fuel boilers estimated in the first 3 years of this rule is 60. In order to calculate a per year estimate of the number of boilers required to meet these rule requirements, the number of projected boilers is divided by 3, or 20 boilers per year.Assuming 2 unit per facility, 10 new facilities will be subject per year.g Only the number of new large solid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrations.f If you demonstrate compliance with any applicable emission limit through stack testing, you must develop a site-specific monitoring plan. All new large solid fuel units are expected to develop this plan.Burden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B)Stack Testingand FuelAnalysis CostPerOccurrence(C)Non-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(D)Number ofOccurrencesPerRespondentPer Year(E)TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year (A XD)(F)Number ofRespondentsPer Year(G)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (FX G)(H)ClericalHoursper Year@$48.53(H X 0.1)(I)ManagementHoursper Year@$114.49(H X .05)(J)Total LaborCosts Per Year(K)Total NonLabor CapitalCost(L)Total NonLabor AnnualCost(M) TotalNumber ofResponses perYear (D X F) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements40$0$014010 400 40 20 $43,511$0$0a, bB. Required Activities1. Initial Stack Test and Report (for PM)12 $8,000 $0112448 5 2 $5,221 $32,000 $0b, c2. Initial Stack Test and Report (for Hg)12 $5,000 $011200 0 0$0$0$0b, c, j3. Initial Performance Test and Report (for CO)12 $6,000 $0112448 5 2 $5,221 $24,000 $0b, d4. Annual Stack Test and Report (for PM)12 $8,000 $0112448 5 2 $5,221 $32,000 $32,000e5. Annual Stack Test and Report (for Hg)12 $5,000 $011200 0 0$0$0$0b, c, j6. Annual Performance Test and Report (for CO) 12 $6,000 $0112448 5 2 $5,221 $24,000 $24,000d, e7. Initial Fuel Analysis for Mercury Content5$200 $01500 0 0$0$0$0b, c8. Monthly Fuel Analysis for Mercury Content5$200 $0126000 0 0$0$0$0c, e9. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoring plan (all)40$0$014010 400 40 20 $43,511$0$0fOpacitya) initial10$0 $43,100 110440 4 2 $4,351 $172,400 $172,400hb) annual10$0 $14,700 110440 4 2 $4,351$0 $58,800hCO (only sources greater than 100 mmBtu/hr)a) initial10$0 $160,900 11016 160 16 8 $17,404 $2,574,400 $2,574,400gb) annual10$0 $53,600 11032 320 32 16 $34,809$0 $1,715,200gBag Leak Detection System Operation(all sources that have fabric filters)a) initial10$0 $25,500 11000 0 0$0$0$0hb) annual10$0 $9,700 11000 0 0$0$0$0hC. Create InformationnaD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparation1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject2$0$0121020 2 1 $2,176$0$010 a, b2) Notification of Initial Stack Test8$0$0181080 8 4 $8,702$0$010 a, b3) Report Established Values for Site-specificOperating Parameters (all)see 3.E.64) Notification of Compliance Status40$0$014010 400 40 20 $43,511$0$010 a, b5) Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction Plan40$0$014010 400 40 20 $43,511$0$010 a, b6) Semi-annual Compliance Report20$0$024020 800 80 40 $87,022$0$040aReporting Subtotal2,292 229 115 $249,318 $112,000 $56,000 80i4. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read Instructionssee 3.AB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaD. Record Information1) Records of Operating Parameter Values20$0$012040 800 80 40 $87,022$0$040a2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction15$0$011540 600 60 30 $65,267$0$040a3) Records of Stack Tests2$0$0124080 8 4 $8,702$0$040a4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations2$0$0123264 6 3 $6,962$0$032g5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted2$0$02440 160 16 8 $17,404$0$080a6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use0.5$0$012640 240 24 12 $26,107$0$0480 aE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaSubtotal Recordkeeping2,904 290 145 $315,890 $2,746,800 $4,520,800 712 iTotals5,196 520 260 $565,208 $2,858,800 $4,576,800 792b A one-time requirement.g Only the number of new large solid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrationsi The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotalj Only coal boilers are subject to numerical mercury limits and are required to test for mercury. No new large coal units are projected.Table 3.B. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsh All new coal units greater than 10 mmBtu/hr are expected to install fabric filters and equipped with bag leak detection (BLD) systems instead of opacity monitors. Since biomass units are expected to meet PM limits with an ESP, an opacity monitor is required instead of a BLD.There are no new large coal units projected to be installed.f If you demonstrate compliance with any applicable emission limit through stack testing, you must develop a site-specific monitoring plan. All new large solid fuel units are expected to develop this plan.for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters - Year 2, New Large Solid Fuel Unitsc This NESHAP provides a compliance option to conduct a fuel analysis once every five years, if a unit burns the same kind of fuel, or re-conduct a fuel analysis if a unit changes fuel type. All projected large solid fuel units expected to comply through stack testing instead of thefuel testing compliance option, see note a for the derivation of the number of units per year. Only units less than 30 mmBtu/hr that are not subject to PM limits under the NSPS (40 CFR part 60 subparts Db, Dc) will incur additional testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reportingcosts under this rule.a The total number of new large solid fuel boilers estimated in the first 3 years of this rule is 60. In order to calculate a per year estimate of the number of boilers required to meet these rule requirements, the number of projected boilers is divided by 3, or 20 boilers per year.Assuming 2 unit per facility, 10 new facilities will be subject per year.d All new large solid fuel units must conduct an initial test for CO, see note a for the derivation of the number of units per year.e Subsequent annual testing in year 2 are based on the number of sources that had an initial test in year 1 of this ICR. Subsequent semi-annual compliance reporting and recordkeeping requirements are based on the number of new sources in years 1 and 2 of this ICR.Burden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B)StackTesting andFuelAnalysisCost PerOccurrence(C)Non-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(D)Number ofOccurrencesPerRespondentPer Year(E)TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year (AX D)(F)Number ofRespondentsPer Year(G)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (FX G)(H)ClericalHoursper Year@$48.53(H X 0.1)(I)ManagementHoursper Year@$114.49(H X .05)(J)Total LaborCosts Per Year(K)Total NonLabor CapitalCost(L)Total NonLabor AnnualCost(M) TotalNumber ofResponsesper Year (D XF) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements40$0$014010 400 40 20 $43,511$0$0a, bB. Required Activities1. Initial Stack Test and Report (for PM)12 $8,000 $0112448 5 2 $5,221 $32,000 $0b, c2. Initial Stack Test and Report (for Hg)12 $5,000 $011200 0 0$0$0$0b, c, j3. Initial Performance Test and Report (for CO) 12 $6,000 $0112448 5 2 $5,221 $24,000 $0b, d4. Annual Stack Test and Report (for PM)12 $8,000 $0112896 10 5 $10,443 $64,000 $64,000e5. Annual Stack Test and Report (for Hg)12 $5,000 $011200 0 0$0$0$0b, c, j6. Annual Performance Test and Report (for CO) 12 $6,000 $0112896 10 5 $10,443 $48,000 $48,000d, e7. Initial Fuel Analysis for Mercury Content5 $200 $01500 0 0$0$0$0b, c8. Monthly Fuel Analysis for Mercury Content5 $200 $0126000 0 0$0$0$0c, e9. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoring plan (all)40$0$014010 400 40 20 $43,511$0$0fOpacitya) initial 10 $0 $43,100 1 10 4 40 4 2 $4,351 $172,400 $172,400 hb) annual 10 $0 $14,700 1 10 4 40 4 2 $4,351 $0 $58,800 hCO (only sources greater than 100 mmBtu/hr)a) initial 10 $0 $160,900 1 10 16 160 16 8 $17,404 $2,574,400 $2,574,400 gb) annual 10 $0 $53,600 1 10 48 480 48 24 $52,213 $0 $2,572,800 gBag Leak Detection System Operation(all sources that have fabric filters)a) initial 10 $0 $25,500 1 10 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 hb) annual 10 $0 $9,700 1 10 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 hC. Create Information naD. Gather Information naE. Report Preparation1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject 2 $0 $0 1 2 10 20 2 1 $2,176 $0 $0 10 a, b2) Notification of Initial Stack Test 8 $0 $0 1 8 10 80 8 4 $8,702 $0 $0 10 a, b3) Report Established Values for Site-specificOperating Parameters (all) see 3.E.64) Notification of Compliance Status 40 $0 $0 1 40 10 400 40 20 $43,511 $0 $0 10 a, b5) Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction Plan 40 $0 $0 1 40 10 400 40 20 $43,511 $0 $0 10 a, b6) Semi-annual Compliance Report 20 $0 $0 2 40 30 1,200 120 60 $130,533 $0 $0 60 aReporting Subtotal2,788 279 139 $303,272 $168,000 $112,000 100 i4. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read Instructions see 3.AB. Implement Activities naC. Develop Record System naD. Record Information1) Records of Operating Parameter Values 20 $0 $0 1 20 60 1,200 120 60 $130,533 $0 $0 60 a2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction 15 $0 $0 1 15 60 900 90 45 $97,900 $0 $0 60 a3) Records of Stack Tests 2 $0 $0 1 2 60 120 12 6 $13,053 $0 $0 60 a4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations 2 $0 $0 1 2 49 98 10 5 $10,660 $0 $0 49 g5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted 2 $0 $0 2 4 60 240 24 12 $26,107 $0 $0 120 a6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use 0.5 $0 $0 12 6 60 360 36 18 $39,160 $0 $0 720 aE. Personnel Training naF. Time for Audits naSubtotal Recordkeeping4,038 404 202 $439,244 $2,746,800 $5,378,400 1,069 iTotals6,826 683 341 $742,515 $2,914,800 $5,490,400 1,169b A one-time requirement.g Only the number of new large solid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrationsi The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotalj Only coal boilers are subject to numerical mercury limits and are required to test for mercury. No new large coal units are projected.Table 3.C. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsh All new coal units greater than 10 mmBtu/hr are expected to install fabric filters and equipped with bag leak detection (BLD) systems instead of opacity monitors. Since biomass units are expected to meet PM limits with an ESP, an opacity monitor is required instead of a BLD.There are no new large coal units projected to be installed.f If you demonstrate compliance with any applicable emission limit through stack testing, you must develop a site-specific monitoring plan. All new large solid fuel units are expected to develop this plan.for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters - Year 3, New Large Solid Fuel Unitsc This NESHAP provides a compliance option to conduct a fuel analysis once every five years, if a unit burns the same kind of fuel, or re-conduct a fuel analysis if a unit changes fuel type. All projected large solid fuel units expected to comply through stack testing instead ofthe fuel testing compliance option, see note a for the derivation of the number of units per year. Only units less than 30 mmBtu/hr that are not subject to PM limits under the NSPS (40 CFR part 60 subparts Db, Dc) will incur additional testing, monitoring, recordkeeping andreporting costs under this rule.a The total number of new large solid fuel boilers estimated in the first 3 years of this rule is 60. In order to calculate a per year estimate of the number of boilers required to meet these rule requirements, the number of projected boilers is divided by 3, or 20 boilers per year.Assuming 2 unit per facility, 10 new facilities will be subject per year.d All new large solid fuel units must conduct an initial test for CO, see note a for the derivation of the number of units per year.e Subsequent annual testing in year 3 are based on the number of sources that had an initial test in year 1 and 2 of this ICR. Subsequent semi-annual compliance reporting and recordkeeping requirements are based on the number of new sources in years 1-3 of this ICR.Burden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B)Stack Testingand FuelAnalysisCost PerOccurrence(C)Non-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(D)Number ofOccurrencesPerRespondentPer Year(E)TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year (AX D)(F)Number ofRespondentsPer Year(G)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (FX G)(H)ClericalHoursper Year@$48.53(H X 0.1)(I)ManagementHoursper Year@$114.49(H X .05)(J)Total LaborCosts Per Year(K)Total NonLabor CapitalCost(L)Total NonLabor AnnualCost(M) TotalNumber ofResponses perYear (D X F) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements40$0$014081 3,240 324 162 $352,439 $0$0a, bB. Required Activities1. Initial Stack Test and Report (for PM12 $8,000 $0112162 1,944 194 97 $211,463 $1,296,000 $0b,c2. Initial Performance Test and Report (for CO12 $6,000 $0112162 1,944 194 97 $211,463 $972,000 $0b, d3. Annual Stack Test and Report (for PM12 $8,000 $011200 0 0$0$0$0e4. Annual Performance Test and Report (for CO 12 $6,000 $011200 0 0$0$0$0d, e5. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoring plan (all40$0$014081 3,240 324 162 $352,439 $0$0fOpacitya) initia10$0 $43,100 110147 1,470 147 74 $159,903 $6,335,700 $6,335,700hb) annua10$0 $14,700 110147 1,470 147 74 $159,903 $0 $2,160,900hCO (only sources greater than 100 mmBtu/hra) initia10$0 $160,900 11000 0 0$0$0$0gb) annua10$0 $53,600 11000 0 0$0$0$0gBag Leak Detection System Operation(all sources that have fabric filters)a) initia10$0 $25,500 11015 150 15 8 $16,317 $382,500 $382,500hb) annua10$0 $9,700 11015 150 15 8 $16,317$0 $145,500hC. Create InformationnaD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparation1) Initial Notification that Source is Subjec2$0$01281 162 16 8 $17,622$0$081 a, b2) Notification of Initial Stack Test8$0$01881 648 65 32 $70,488$0$081 a, b3) Report Established Values for Site-specificOperating Parameters (all)see 3.E.64) Notification of Compliance Status40$0$014081 3,240 324 162 $352,439 $0$081 a, b5) Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction Plan40$0$014081 3,240 324 162 $352,439 $0$081 a, b6) Semi-annual Compliance Report20$0$024081 3,240 324 162 $352,439 $0$0162 aReporting Subtotal17,658 1,766 883 $1,920,793 $2,268,000 $0486 i4. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read Instructionssee 3.AB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaD. Record Information1) Records of Operating Parameter Values20$0$0120162 3,240 324 162 $352,439 $0$0162 a2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction15$0$0115162 2,430 243 122 $264,329 $0$0162 a3) Records of Stack Tests2$0$012162 324 32 16 $35,244$0$0162 a4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations2$0$012162 324 32 16 $35,244$0$0162 g5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted2$0$02481 324 32 16 $35,244$0$0162 a6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use0.5$0$0126162 972 97 49 $105,732 $0$01,944 aE. Personnel Trainingna.F. Time for AuditsnaSubtotal Recordkeeping14,094 1,409 705 $1,533,110 $6,718,200 $9,024,600 2,754 iTotals31,752 3,175 1,588 $3,453,903 $8,986,200 $9,024,600 3,240b A one-time requirement.i The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotalTable 4.A. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsh All new units greater than 10 mmBtu/hr are expected to install fabric filters and equipped with bag leak detection systems instead of opacity monitorsd All new large liquid fuel units must conduct an initial test for CO, see note a for the derivation of the number of units per year.e No annual test and reporting burden is shown in year 1 as this is the same year as the initial test and report.for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters - Year 1, New Large Liquid Fuel Unitsc This NESHAP provides a compliance option to conduct a fuel analysis once every five years, if a unit burns the same kind of fuel, or re-conduct a fuel analysis if a unit changes fuel type. All projected large liquid fuel units are expected to comply with mercury limits throughthe fuel testing compliance option instead of stack testing, see note a for the derivation of the number of units per year.a The total number of new large liquid fuel boilers estimated in the first 3 years of this rule is 487. In order to calculate a per year estimate of the number of boilers required to meet these rule requirements, the number of projected boilers is divided by 3, or 162.3 rounded to162 boilers per year. 162 boilers will be accounted for in year 1 and 2 and 163 in year 3. Assuming 2 unit per facility, 81 new facilities will be subject in year 1 and 2 and 82 facilities in year 3.g Only the number of new large liquid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrations. The is expected to be 0 new boilers under the category.f If you demonstrate compliance with any applicable emission limit through stack testing, you must develop a site-specific monitoring plan. All new large solid fuel units are expected to develop this plan.Burden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B)Stack Testingand FuelAnalysisCost PerOccurrence(C)Non-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(D)Number ofOccurrencesPerRespondentPer Year(E)TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year (AX D)(F)Number ofRespondentsPer Year(G)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (FX G)(H)ClericalHoursper Year@$48.53(H X 0.1)(I)ManagementHoursper Year@$114.49(H X .05)(J)Total LaborCosts Per Year(K)Total NonLabor CapitalCost(L) TotalNon-LaborAnnual Cost(M) TotalNumber ofResponses perYear (D X F) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements40$0$014081 3,240 324 162 $352,439 $0$0a, bB. Required Activities1. Initial Stack Test and Report (for PM12 $8,000 $0112162 1,944 194 97 $211,463 $1,296,000 $0b,c2. Initial Performance Test and Report (for CO12 $6,000 $0112162 1,944 194 97 $211,463 $972,000$0b, d3. Annual Stack Test and Report (for PM12 $8,000 $0112162 1,944 194 97 $211,463 $1,296,000 $1,296,000e4. Annual Performance Test and Report (for CO 12 $6,000 $0112162 1,944 194 97 $211,463 $972,000 $972,000d, e5. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoring plan (all40$0$014081 3,240 324 162 $352,439 $0$0fOpacitya) initia10$0 $43,100 110147 1,470 147 74 $159,903 $6,335,700 $6,335,700hb) annua10$0 $14,700 110294 2,940 294 147 $319,806 $0 $4,321,800hCO (only sources greater than 100 mmBtu/hra) initia10$0 $160,900 11000 0 0$0$0$0gb) annua10$0 $53,600 11000 0 0$0$0$0gBag Leak Detection System Operation(all sources that have fabric filters)a) initia10$0 $25,500 11015 150 15 8 $16,317 $382,500 $382,500hb) annua10$0 $9,700 11030 300 30 15 $32,633$0$291,000hC. Create InformationnaD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparation1) Initial Notification that Source is Subjec2$0$01281 162 16 8 $17,622$0$081 a, b2) Notification of Initial Stack Test8$0$01881 648 65 32 $70,488$0$081 a, b3) Report Established Values for Site-specificOperating Parameters (all)see 3.E.64) Notification of Compliance Status40$0$014081 3,240 324 162 $352,439 $0$081 a, b5) Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction Plan40$0$014081 3,240 324 162 $352,439 $0$081 a, b6) Semi-annual Compliance Report20$0$0240162 6,480 648 324 $704,878 $0$0324 aReporting Subtotal24,786 2,479 1,239 $2,696,159 $4,536,000 $2,268,000 648 i4. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read Instructionssee 3.AB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaD. Record Information1) Records of Operating Parameter Values20$0$0120324 6,480 648 324 $704,878 $0$0324 a2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction15$0$0115324 4,860 486 243 $528,659 $0$0324 a3) Records of Stack Tests2$0$012324 648 65 32 $70,488$0$0324 a4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations2$0$012324 648 65 32 $70,488$0$0324 g5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted2$0$024243 972 97 49 $105,732 $0$0486 a6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use0.5$0$0126324 1,944 194 97 $211,463 $0$03,888 aE. Personnel Trainingna.F. Time for AuditsnaSubtotal Recordkeeping23,652 2,365 1,183 $2,572,805 $6,718,200 $11,331,000 5,670 iTotals48,438 4,844 2,422 $5,268,965 $11,254,200 $13,599,000 6,318b A one-time requirement.g Only the number of new large solid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrationsi The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotalTable 4.B. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsf If you demonstrate compliance with any applicable emission limit through stack testing, you must develop a site-specific monitoring plan. All new large solid fuel units are expected to develop this plan.h All new units greater than 10 mmBtu/hr are expected to install fabric filters and equipped with bag leak detection systems instead of opacity monitorsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters - Year 2, New Large Liquid Fuel Unitsc This NESHAP provides a compliance option to conduct a fuel analysis once every five years, if a unit burns the same kind of fuel, or re-conduct a fuel analysis if a unit changes fuel type. All projected large solid fuel units expected to comply through stack testing instead of thefuel testing compliance option, see note a for the derivation of the number of units per year.a The total number of new large liquid fuel boilers estimated in the first 3 years of this rule is 487. In order to calculate a per year estimate of the number of boilers required to meet these rule requirements, the number of projected boilers is divided by 3, or 162.3 rounded to 162boilers per year. 162 boilers will be accounted for in year 1 and 2 and 163 in year 3. Assuming 2 unit per facility, 81 new facilities will be subject in year 1 and 2 and 82 facilities in year 3.d All new large solid fuel units must conduct an initial test for CO, see note a for the derivation of the number of units per year.e Subsequent annual testing in year 2 are based on the number of sources that had an initial test in year 1 of this ICR. Subsequent semi-annual compliance reporting and recordkeeping requirements are based on the number of new sources in years 1 and 2 of this ICR. Sincefuel analysis is only required once every five years, no burden is assigned in year 2.Burden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B)StackTesting andFuel AnalysisCost PerOccurrence(C)Non-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(D)Number ofOccurrencesPerRespondentPer Year(E)TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year (AX D)(F)Number ofRespondentsPer Year(G)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (FX G)(H)ClericalHoursper Year@$48.53(H X 0.1)(I)ManagementHoursper Year@$114.49(H X .05)(J)Total LaborCosts Per Year(K) TotalNon-Labor CapitalCost(L)Total NonLabor AnnualCost(M) TotalNumber ofResponses perYear (D X F) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studies na3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements 40 $0 $0 1 40 82 3,280 328 164 $356,790 $0 $0 a, bB. Required Activities1. Initial Stack Test and Report (for PM) 12 $8,000 $0 1 12 163 1,956 196 98 $212,769 $1,304,000 $0 b, c2. Initial Performance Test and Report (for CO) 12 $6,000 $0 1 12 163 1,956 196 98 $212,769 $978,000 $0 b, d3. Annual Stack Test and Report (for PM) 12 $8,000 $0 1 12 324 3,888 389 194 $422,927 $2,592,000 $2,592,000 e4. Annual Performance Test and Report (for CO) 12 $6,000 $0 1 12 324 3,888 389 194 $422,927 $1,944,000 $1,944,000 d, e5. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoring plan (all) 40 $0 $0 1 40 82 3,280 328 164 $356,790 $0 $0fOpacitya) initial 10 $0 $43,100 1 10 147 1,470 147 74 $159,903 $6,335,700 $6,335,700 hb) annual 10 $0 $14,700 1 10 441 4,410 441 221 $479,709 $0 $6,482,700 hCO (only sources greater than 100 mmBtu/hr)a) initial 10 $0 $160,900 1 10 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 gb) annual 10 $0 $53,600 1 10 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 gBag Leak Detection System Operation(all sources that have fabric filters)a) initial 10 $0 $25,500 1 10 15 150 15 8 $16,317 $382,500 $382,500 hb) annual 10 $0 $9,700 1 10 45 450 45 23 $48,950 $0 $436,500 hC. Create Information naD. Gather Information naE. Report Preparation1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject 2 $0 $0 1 2 82 164 16 8 $17,840 $0 $0 82 a, b2) Notification of Initial Stack Test 8 $0 $0 1 8 82 656 66 33 $71,358 $0 $0 82 a, b3) Report Established Values for Site-specificOperating Parameters (all) see 3.E.64) Notification of Compliance Status 40 $0 $0 1 40 82 3,280 328 164 $356,790 $0 $0 82 a, b5) Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction Plan 40 $0 $0 1 40 82 3,280 328 164 $356,790 $0 $0 82 a, b6) Semi-annual Compliance Report20$0$0240244 9,760 976 488 $1,061,668$0$0488 aReporting Subtotal32,108 3,211 1,605 $3,492,628 $6,818,000 $4,536,000 816 i4. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read Instructions see 3.AB. Implement Activities naC. Develop Record System naD. Record Information1) Records of Operating Parameter Values 20 $0 $0 1 20 487 9,740 974 487 $1,059,493 $0 $0 487 a2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction 15 $0 $0 1 15 487 7,305 731 365 $794,620 $0 $0 487 a3) Records of Stack Tests 2 $0 $0 1 2 487 974 97 49 $105,949 $0 $0 487 a4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations 2 $0 $0 1 2 487 974 97 49 $105,949 $0 $0 487 g5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted 2 $0 $0 2 4 487 1,948 195 97 $211,899 $0 $0 974 a6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use 0.5 $0 $0 12 6 487 2,922 292 146 $317,848 $0 $0 5,844 aE. Personnel Training na .F. Time for Audits naSubtotal Recordkeeping33,623 3,362 1,681 $3,657,426 $6,718,200 $13,637,400 8,766 iTotals65,731 6,573 3,287 $7,150,054 $13,536,200 $18,173,400 9,582b A one-time requirement.Table 4.C. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters - Year 3, New Large Liquid Fuel Unitsc This NESHAP provides a compliance option to conduct a fuel analysis once every five years, if a unit burns the same kind of fuel, or re-conduct a fuel analysis if a unit changes fuel type. All projected large solid fuel units expected to comply through stack testing instead of thefuel testing compliance option, see note a for the derivation of the number of units per year.a The total number of new large liquid fuel boilers estimated in the first 3 years of this rule is 487. In order to calculate a per year estimate of the number of boilers required to meet these rule requirements, the number of projected boilers is divided by 3, or 162.3 rounded to 162boilers per year. 162 boilers will be accounted for in year 1 and 2 and 163 in year 3. Assuming 2 unit per facility, 81 new facilities will be subject in year 1 and 2 and 82 facilities in year 3.d All new large solid fuel units must conduct an initial test for CO, see note a for the derivation of the number of units per year.e Subsequent annual testing in year 3 are based on the number of sources that had an initial test in year 1 and 2 of this ICR. Subsequent semi-annual compliance reporting and recordkeeping requirements are based on the number of new sources in years 1-3 of this ICR. Sincefuel analysis is only required once every five years, no burden is assigned in year 2.Table 4.C. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters - Year 3, New Large Liquid Fuel Unitsg Only the number of new large solid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrationsi The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotalf If you demonstrate compliance with any applicable emission limit through stack testing, you must develop a site-specific monitoring plan. All new large solid fuel units are expected to develop this plan.h All new units greater than 10 mmBtu/hr are expected to install fabric filters and equipped with bag leak detection systems instead of opacity monitorsBurden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B) CertifiedEnergy AuditCost perOccurrence(C) Annual TuneUp Cost perOccurrence(D) Other NonLabor CostsPerOccurrence(E) Number ofOccurrences PerRespondent PerYear\(F) TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year(A X E)(G) Number ofRespondents PerYear(H)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (F XG)(I)ClericalHours perYear @$48.53 (HX 0.1)(J)ManagementHours perYear @$114.49 (H X.05)(K) Total LaborCosts Per Year(L) Total NonLabor CapitalCosts(M) Total NonLabor AnnualCosts(N) TotalNumber ofResponsesper Year (E XG) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand RuleRequirements40 $0 $0 $0 1 40 5,315 212,600 21,260 10,630 $23,126,097 $0 $0 aB. Required Activities1. Conduct Energy Audita) Industrial 20 $18,292 $0 $0 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 b, c, db) Commercial 20 $854 $0 $0 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 b, c, d2. Biennial Tune-Up12 $0 $2,228 $0 0.5 6 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 cC. Create InformationnaD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparation1) Initial Notification that Source isSubject2 $0 $0 $0 1 2 5,315 10,630 1,063 532 $1,156,305 $0 $0 5,315 a2) Notification of Compliance Status8 $0 $0 $0 1 8 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 c3) Biennial Compliance Report5 $0 $0 $0 0.5 2.5 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 cReporting Subtotal223,230 22,323 11,162 24,282,401 0 0 5,3154. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read InstructionsIncluded in 3aB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaeD. Record Information1) Records of All Notifications andCompliance Reports Submitted2 $0 $0 $0 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 c2) Records of Startup, Shutdown,Malfunction15 $0 $0 $0 1 15 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 c3) Records of Biennial Tune-Up0.5 $0 $0 $0 0.5 0.25 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 cE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaRecordkeepingSubtotal000 $0 $0 $0 0Totals223,230 22,323 11,162 $24,282,401 $0$05,315a Number of respondents based on number of existing small solid fuel boilers which includes biomass and coal units less than 10 mmBtu/hr (assumption of 2 units per facility).e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required.d Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. Cost depends on whether the source is industrial orcommercial. It is assumed that 10% will be industrial and 90% will be commercial sources. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals. Audits are required for facilities with large units only.b Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from the audiprofessional. Audits are required for facilities with large units only.c Since existing units have three years after the publication date of the final rule to submit initial notification of compliance status, conduct compliance activities, or meet recordkeeping or reporting requirements, no burden is assumed in year 1.Table 5.A. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers - Year 1, Existing Small Solid Fuel UnitsBurden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B) CertifiedEnergy AuditCost perOccurrence(C) Annual TuneUp Cost perOccurrence(D) Other NonLabor CostsPerOccurrence(E) Number ofOccurrences PerRespondent PerYear\(F) TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year(A X E)(G) Number ofRespondents PerYear(H)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (F XG)(I)ClericalHours perYear @$48.53 (HX 0.1)(J)ManagementHours perYear @$114.49 (H X.05)(K) Total LaborCosts Per Year(L) Total NonLabor CapitalCosts(M) Total NonLabor AnnualCosts(N) TotalNumber ofResponsesper Year (E XG) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand RuleRequirements40 $0 $0 $0 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 aB. Required Activities1. Conduct Energy Audita) Industrial 20 $18,292 $0 $0 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 b, c, db) Commercial 20 $854 $0 $0 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 b, c, d2. Biennial Tune-Up12 $0 $2,228 $0 0.5 6 5,315 31,890 3,189 1,595 $3,468,914 $0 $11,841,820 cC. Create InformationnaD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparation1) Initial Notification that Source isSubject2 $0 $0 $0 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 a2) Notification of Compliance Status8 $0 $0 $0 1 8 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 c3) Biennial Compliance Report5 $0 $0 $0 0.5 2.5 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 cReporting Subtotal31,890 3,189 1,595 3,468,914 0 11,841,820 04. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read InstructionsIncluded in 3aB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaeD. Record Information1) Records of All Notifications andCompliance Reports Submitted2 $0 $0 $0 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 c2) Records of Startup, Shutdown,Malfunction15 $0 $0 $0 1 15 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 c3) Records of Biennial Tune-Up0.5 $0 $0 $0 0.5 0.25 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 cE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaRecordkeepingSubtotal000 $0 $0 $0 0Totals31,890 3,189 1,595 $3,468,914 $0 $11,841,820 0a The burden on existing sources to read and understand rule requirements, and submit an initial notification were assumed to all occur in year 1e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required.d Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. Cost depends on whether the source is industrial or commercial.It is assumed that 10% will be industrial and 90% will be commercial sources. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals. Audits are required for facilities with large units only.Table 5.B. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers - Year 2, Existing Small Solid Fuel Unitsb Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from the auditprofessional. Audits are required for facilities with large units only.c Since existing units have three years after the publication date of the final rule to submit initial notification of compliance status, conduct compliance activities, or meet recordkeeping or reporting requirements, it is assumed that half the affected units willconduct an audit, testing and monitoring plan development in year 2 and half will conduct them in year 3 in order to be in compliance by the third year after promulgation. Initial Notification of Compliance Reports and recordkeeping requirements will notbegin until year 3 of this ICR.Burden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B) CertifiedEnergy AuditCost perOccurrence(C) AnnualTune-Up Costper Occurrence(D) Other NonLabor CostsPerOccurrence(E) Number ofOccurrences PerRespondent PerYear\(F) TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year(A X E)(G) Number ofRespondentsPer Year(H)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (F XG)(I)ClericalHours perYear @$48.53 (HX 0.1)(J)ManagementHours perYear @$114.49 (HX .05)(K) Total LaborCosts Per Year(L) Total NonLabor CapitalCosts(M) Total NonLabor AnnualCosts(N) TotalNumber ofResponsesper Year (E XG) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand RuleRequirements40 $0 $0 $0 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 aB. Required Activities1. Conduct Energy Audita) Industrial 20 $18,292 $0 $0 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 b, c, db) Commercial 20 $854 $0 $0 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 b, c, d2. Biennial Tune-Up12 $0 $2,228 $0 0.5 6 5,315 31,890 3,189 1,595 $3,468,914 $0 $11,841,820 cC. Create InformationnaD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparation1) Initial Notification that Source isSubject2 $0 $0 $0 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 a2) Notification of Compliance Status8 $0 $0 $0 1 8 5,315 42,520 4,252 2,126 $4,625,219 $0 $0 5,315 c3) Biennial Compliance Report5 $0 $0 $0 0.5 2.5 5,315 13,288 1,329 664 $1,445,381 $0 $0 2,658 cReporting Subtotal87,698 8,770 4,385 9,539,515 0 11,841,820 7,9734. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read InstructionsIncluded in 3aB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaeD. Record Information1) Records of All Notifications andCompliance Reports Submitted2 $0 $0 $0 1 2 10,629 21,258 2,126 1,063 $2,312,392 $0 $0 10,629 c2) Records of Startup, Shutdown,Malfunction15 $0 $0 $0 1 15 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 c,f3) Records of Biennial Tune-Up0.5 $0 $0 $0 0.5 0.25 10,629 2,657 266 133 $289,049 $0 $0 5,315 cE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaRecordkeepingSubtotal23,915 2,392 1,196 $2,601,441 $0$015,944Totals111,613 11,161 5,581 $12,140,956 $0 $11,841,820 23,916a The burden on existing sources to read and understand rule requirements, and submit an initial notification were assumed to all occur in year1.e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required.f Small units are not required to keep records on start-up shutdown and malfunction.d Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. Cost depends on whether the source is industrial orcommercial. It is assumed that 10% will be industrial and 90% will be commercial sources. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals. Audits are required for facilities with large units only.Table 5.C. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers - Year 3, Existing Small Solid Fuel Unitsb Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from theaudit professional. Audits are required for facilities with large units only.c Since existing units have three years after the publication date of the final rule to submit initial notification of compliance status, conduct compliance activities, or meet recordkeeping or reporting requirements, it is assumed that half the affected units willconduct an audit, testing and monitoring plan development in year 2 and half will conduct them in year 3 in order to be in compliance by the third year after promulgation. Initial Notification of Compliance Reports and recordkeeping requirements will notbegin until year 3 of this ICR.Burden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B) CertifiedEnergy AuditCost perOccurrence(C) AnnualTune-Up Costper Occurrence(D) Other NonLabor CostsPerOccurrence(E) Number ofOccurrences PerRespondent PerYear\(F) TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year(A X E)(G) Number ofRespondentsPer Year(H) TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (F XG)(I)ClericalHours perYear @$48.53 (H X0.1)(J)ManagementHours perYear @$114.49 (HX .05)(K) Total LaborCosts Per Year(L) Total NonLabor CapitalCosts(M) Total NonLabor AnnualCosts(N) TotalNumber ofResponsesper Year (E XG) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand RuleRequirements40 $0 $0 $0 1 40 79,387 3,175,480 317,548 158,774 $345,420,776 $0 $0 aB. Required Activities1. Conduct Energy Audita) Industrial 20 $18,292 $0 $0 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 b, c, db) Commercial 20 $854 $0 $0 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 b, c, d2. Biennial Tune-Up12 $0 $2,228 $0 0.5 6 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 cC. Create InformationnaD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparation1) Initial Notification that Source isSubject2 $0 $0 $0 1 2 79,387 158,774 15,877 7,939 $17,271,039 $0 $0 79,387 a2) Notification of Compliance Status8 $0 $0 $0 1 8 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 c3) Biennial Compliance Report5 $0 $0 $0 0.5 2.5 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 cReporting Subtotal3,334,254 333,425 166,713 362,691,814 0 0 79,3874. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read InstructionsIncluded in 3aB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaeD. Record Information1) Records of All Notifications andCompliance Reports Submitted2 $0 $0 $0 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 c2) Records of Startup, Shutdown,Malfunction15 $0 $0 $0 1 15 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 c3) Records of Biennial Tune-Up0.5 $0 $0 $0 0.5 0.25 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 cE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaRecordkeepingSubtotal000 $0 $0 $0 0Totals3,334,254 333,425 166,713 $362,691,814 $0$079,387a Number of respondents based on number of existing small liquid fuel boilers which includes biomass and coal units less than 10 mmBtu/hr (assumption of 2 units per facility).e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required.d Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. Cost depends on whether the source is industrial or commercial. Itis assumed that 10% will be industrial and 90% will be commercial sources. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals. Audits are required for facilities with large units only.Table 6.A. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers - Year 1, Existing Small Liquid Fuel Unitsb Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from the auditprofessional. Audits are required for facilities with large units only.c Since existing units have three years after the publication date of the final rule to submit initial notification of compliance status, conduct compliance activities, or meet recordkeeping or reporting requirements, no burden is assumed in year 1.Burden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B) CertifiedEnergy AuditCost perOccurrence(C)Annual TuneUp Cost perOccurrence(D) Other NonLabor CostsPerOccurrence(E) Number ofOccurrences PerRespondent PerYear\(F) TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year(A X E)(G) Number ofRespondents PerYear(H)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (F XG)(I)ClericalHours perYear @$48.53(H X0.1)(J)ManagementHours perYear @$114.49(H X.05)(K) Total LaborCosts Per Year(L)Total Non-LaborCapital Costs(M) Total NonLabor Annual Costs(N) TotalNumber ofResponsesper Year (E XG) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. ReportingRequirementsA. Read and Understand RuleRequirements40 $0 $0 $0 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 aB. Required Activities1. Conduct EnergyAudita)Industria20$18,292$0$01200000$0$0$0b, c, db)Commercia20$854$0$01200000$0$0$0b, c, d2. Biennial Tune-Up12$0$2,228$00.5639,694 238,164 23,816 11,908 $25,906,885$0$88,438,232cC. Create InformationnaD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparation1)Initial Notification that Source isSubject2 $0 $0 $0 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 a2) Notification of Compliance Status8 $0 $0 $0 1 8 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 c3)Biennial Compliance Report5 $0 $0 $0 0.5 2.5 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 cReporting Subtotal238,164 23,816 11,908 25,906,885 0 88,438,232 04. RecordkeepingRequirementsA. Read InstructionsIncluded in 3aB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaeD. Record Information1) Records of All Notifications andCompliance Reports Submitted2 $0 $0 $0 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 c2)Records of Startup, Shutdown,Malfunction15 $0 $0 $0 1 15 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 c3)Records of Biennial Tune-Up0.5 $0 $0 $0 0.5 0.25 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 cE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaRecordkeeping Subtotal0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0Totals238,164 23,816 11,908 $25,906,885 $0 $88,438,232 0a The burden on existing sources to read and understand rule requirements, and submit an initial notification were assumed to all occur in year 1.e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required.d Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. Cost depends on whether the source is industrial or commercial. It isassumed that 10% will be industrial and 90% will be commercial sources. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals. Audits are required for facilities with large units only.Table 6.B. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers - Year 2, Existing Small Liquid Fuel Unitsb Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from the auditprofessional. Audits are required for facilities with large units only.c Since existing units have three years after the publication date of the final rule to submit initial notification of compliance status, conduct compliance activities, or meet recordkeeping or reporting requirements, it is assumed that half the affected units willconduct an audit, testing and monitoring plan development in year 2 and half will conduct them in year 3 in order to be in compliance by the third year after promulgation. Initial Notification of Compliance Reports and recordkeeping requirements will not beginuntil year 3 of this ICR.Burden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B) CertifiedEnergy AuditCost perOccurrence(C) AnnualTune-Up Costper Occurrence(D) Other NonLabor CostsPerOccurrence(E) Number ofOccurrences PerRespondent PerYear\(F) TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year(A X E)(G) Number ofRespondentsPer Year(H)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (F XG)(I)ClericalHours perYear @$48.53 (HX 0.1)(J)ManagementHours perYear @$114.49 (H X.05)(K) Total LaborCosts Per Year(L) Total NonLabor CapitalCosts(M) Total NonLabor AnnualCosts(N) TotalNumber ofResponsesper Year (E XG) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand RuleRequirements40 $0 $0 $0 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 aB. Required Activities1. Conduct Energy Audita) Industrial 20 $18,292 $0 $0 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 b, c, db) Commercial 20 $854 $0 $0 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 b, c, d2. Biennial Tune-Up12 $0 $2,228 $0 0.5 6 39,694 238,161 23,816 11,908 $25,906,558 $0 $88,437,118 cC. Create InformationnaD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparation1) Initial Notification that Source isSubject2 $0 $0 $0 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 a2) Notification of Compliance Status8 $0 $0 $0 1 8 79,387 635,096 63,510 31,755 $69,084,155 $0 $0 79,387 c3) Biennial Compliance Report5 $0 $0 $0 0.5 2.5 79,387 198,468 19,847 9,923 $21,588,798 $0 $0 39,694 cReporting Subtotal1,071,725 107,172 53,586 116,579,512 0 88,437,118 119,0814. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read InstructionsIncluded in 3aB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaeD. Record Information1) Records of All Notifications andCompliance Reports Submitted2 $0 $0 $0 1 2 158,774 317,548 31,755 15,877 $34,542,078 $0 $0 158,774 c2) Records of Startup, Shutdown,Malfunction15 $0 $0 $0 1 15 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0 c, f3) Records of Biennial Tune-Up0.5 $0 $0 $0 0.5 0.25 158,774 39,694 3,969 1,985 $4,317,760 $0 $0 79,387 cE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaRecordkeepingSubtotal357,242 35,724 17,862 $38,859,837$0$0 238,161Totals1,428,966 142,897 71,448 $155,439,349$0 $88,437,118 357,242a The burden on existing sources to read and understand rule requirements, and submit an initial notification were assumed to all occur in year1.e Assumes facility must already maintain records on boiler insurance and/or maintenance schedule. No new record system would be required.f Small units are not required to keep records on start-up shutdown and malfunction.d Cost per occurrence for energy audit professionals including an phone screening to discuss the facility prior to a visit, a 2 to 4 hour site visit, and an additional 2-4 hours to prepare a follow-up report on recommendations and findings. Cost depends on whether the source is industrial or commercial. Itis assumed that 10% will be industrial and 90% will be commercial sources. These site visits are assumed to be conducted by certified energy professionals. Audits are required for facilities with large units only.Table 6.C. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers - Year 3, Existing Small Liquid Fuel Unitsb Cost includes taking an inventory of facility equipment including age, operating schedules, square feet of the facility and other details necessary for preparing for the audit pre-screening, attending the energy audit, and reviewing audit report from the auditprofessional. Audits are required for facilities with large units only.c Since existing units have three years after the publication date of the final rule to submit initial notification of compliance status, conduct compliance activities, or meet recordkeeping or reporting requirements, it is assumed that half the affected units willconduct an audit, testing and monitoring plan development in year 2 and half will conduct them in year 3 in order to be in compliance by the third year after promulgation. Initial Notification of Compliance Reports and recordkeeping requirements will not beginuntil year 3 of this ICR.Burden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B)Stack Testand FuelAnalysis CostPerOccurrence(C)Non-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(D)Number ofOccurrencesPerRespondentPer Year(E)TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year (A XD)(F)Number ofRespondentsPer Year(G)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (FX G)(H)ClericalHoursper Year@$48.53(H X 0.1)(I)ManagementHoursper Year@$114.49(H X .05)(K) TotalLabor Costs PerYear(L)Total Non-LaborCapital Costs(M)Total Non-LaborAnnual Cost(N) TotalNumber ofResponses perYear (D X F) Footnotes1. Applications na2. Surveys and Studies na3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements40$0$014049 1,960 196 98 $213,204$0$0a, bB. Required Activities1. Initial Stack Test and Report (for PM)12 $8,000 $011298 1,176 118 59 $127,922 $784,000$0d2. Initial Stack Test and Report (for Hg)12 $5,000 $011298 1,176 118 59 $127,922 $490,000$0d3. Initial Performance Test and Report (for CO)12 $6,000 $011298 1,176 118 59 $127,922 $588,000$0d4. Annual Stack Test and Report (for PM)12 $8,000 $011200 0 0$0$0$0c,d5. Annual Stack Test and Report (for Hg)12 $5,000 $011200 0 0$0$0$0c,d6. Annual Performance Test and Report (for CO)12 $6,000 $011200 0 0$0$0$0c,d7. Initial Fuel Analysis for Mercury Content5$200 $01500 0 0$0$0$0d8. Annual Fuel Analysis for Mercury Content5$200 $01500 0 0$0$0$0c,d9. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoring plan (all)40$0$014049 1,960 196 98 $213,204$0$0cOpacitya) initial10$0 $43,100 11098 980 98 49 $106,602 $4,223,800 $4,223,800c,fb) annual10$0 $14,700 11098 980 98 49 $106,602$0 $1,440,600c,fCO (only sources greater than 100 mmBtu/hr)a) initial10$0 $160,900 11000 0 0$0$0$0eb) annual10$0 $53,600 11000 0 0$0$0$0eBag Leak Detection System Operation(all sources that have fabric filters)a) initial10$0 $25,500 11000 0 0$0$0$0fb) annual10$0 $9,700 11000 0 0$0$0$0fD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparationna1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject2$0$0124998 10 5 $10,660$0$049a, b2) Notification of Initial Stack Test8$0$01849 392 39 20 $42,641$0$049e3) Report Established Values for Site-specificOperating Parameters (all)see 3.E.64) Notification of Initial Compliance Status40$0$014049 1,960 196 98 $213,204$0$049a, b5) Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction Plan20$0$012049 980 98 49 $106,602$0$049a, d6) Semi-Annual Compliance Report20$0$024049 1,960 196 98 $213,204$0$098Reporting Subtotal10,878 1,088 544 $1,183,282 $1,862,000 $0294i4. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read Instructionssee 3.AB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaD. Record Information1) Records of Operating Parameter Values20$0$012098 1,960 196 98 $213,204$0$098a2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction15$0$011598 1,470 147 74 $159,903$0$098a3) Records of Stack Tests2$0$01298 196 20 10 $21,320$0$098a4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations2$0$01298 196 20 10 $21,320$0$098e,a5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted2$0$02498 392 39 20 $42,641$0$0196a6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use0.5$0$012698 588 59 29 $63,961$0$01,176dE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaRecordkeeping Subtotal8,722 872 436 $948,757 $4,223,800 $5,664,400 1,764iTotals19,600 1,960 980 $2,132,039 $6,085,800 $5,664,400 2,058b A one-time requirement.e Only the new large solid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrations.f It assumed that only new large solid fuel units will install fabric filters and utilize bag leak detection monitoring systems. New small units will use opacity monitoringg The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotald This NESHAP provides a compliance option for mercury from coal to conduct a fuel analysis once every five years, if a unit burns the same kind of fuel, or re-conduct a fuel analysis if a unit changes fuel type. All projected large solid fuel units expected to comply through stacktesting instead of the fuel testing compliance option, see note a for the derivation of the number of units per year.Table 7.A. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters - Year 1, New Small Solid Fuel Unitsc No annual test and reporting burden is shown in year 1 as this is the same year as the initial test and report.a The total number of new small solid fuel boilers estimated in the first 3 years of this rule is 295. In order to calculate a per year estimate of the number of boilers required to meet these rule requirements, the number of projected boilers is divided by 3, or 98.3 rounded to 98boilers per year. 98 boilers will be accounted for in year 1 and 2 and 94 in year 3. Assuming 2 unit per facility, 49 new facilities will be subject in year 1 and 2 and 50 facilities in year 3.Burden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B)Stack Testand FuelAnalysis CostPerOccurrence(C)Non-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(D)Number ofOccurrencesPerRespondentPer Year(E)TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year(A XD)(F)Number ofRespondentsPer Year(G)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (FX G)(H)ClericalHoursper Year@$48.53(H X 0.1)(I)ManagementHoursper Year@$114.49(H X .05)(K) TotalLabor Costs PerYear(L) TotalNon-Labor CapitalCosts(M) TotalNon-Labor AnnualCost(N) TotalNumber ofResponses perYear (D X F) Footnotes1. Applications na2. Surveys and Studiesna3. ReportingRequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements40 $0 $0 1 40 49 1,960 196 98 $213,204 $0 $0 a, bB. Required Activities1. Initial Stack Test and Report(for PM)12 $8,000 $011298 1,176 118 59 $127,922 $784,000$0d2. Initial Stack Test and Report(for Hg)12 $5,000 $011298 1,176 118 59 $127,922 $490,000$0d3. Initial Performance Test and Report(for CO)12 $6,000 $011298 1,176 118 59 $127,922 $588,000$0d4. Annual Stack Test and Report(for PM)12 $8,000 $011298 1,176 118 59 $127,922$0$784,000c,d5. Annual Stack Test and Report(for Hg)12 $5,000 $011298 1,176 118 59 $127,922$0$490,000c,d6. Annual Performance Test and Report(for CO)12 $6,000 $011298 1,176 118 59 $127,922$0$588,000c,d7. Initial Fuel Analysis for MercuryContent5 $200 $01500 0 0$0$0$0d8. Annual Fuel Analysis for MercuryContent5 $200 $01500 0 0$0$0$0c,d9. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoringplan(all)40$0$014049 1,960 196 98 $213,204$0$0cOpacitya)initia10$0 $43,100 11098 980 98 49 $106,602 $4,223,800 $4,223,800c,fb)annual10$0 $14,700 110196 1,960 196 98 $213,204$0$2,881,200c,fCO(onlysourcesgreater than 100 mmBtu/hr)a)initia10$0 $160,900 11000 0 0$0$0$0eb)annual10$0 $53,600 11000 0 0$0$0$0eBagLeak Detection System Operation(all sources that have fabric filters)a)initia10$0 $25,500 11000 0 0$0$0$0fb)annual10$0 $9,700 11000 0 0$0$0$0fD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparationna1)Initial Notification that Source is Subject2$0$0124998 10 5 $10,660$0$049a, b2)Notification of Initial Stack Test8$0$01849 392 39 20 $42,641$0$049e3)Report Established Values for Site-specificOperating Parameters (all)see 3.E.64)Notification of Initial Compliance Status40$0$014049 1,960 196 98 $213,204$0$049a, b5)Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction Plan20$0$012049 980 98 49 $106,602$0$049a, d6)Semi-Annual Compliance Report20$0$024098 3,920 392 196 $426,408$0$0196Reporting Subtotal16,366 1,637 818 $1,780,253 $1,862,000 $1,862,000 392g4. RecordkeepingRequirementsA. Read Instructionssee 3.AB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaD. Record Information1)Records of OperatingParameter Values20$0$0120196 3,920 392 196 $426,408$0$0196a2)Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction15$0$0115196 2,940 294 147 $319,806$0$0196a3)Records of Stack Tests2$0$012196 392 39 20 $42,641$0$0196a4)Records of MonitoringDevice Calibrations2$0$012196 392 39 20 $42,641$0$0196 e,a5)Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted2$0$02498 392 39 20 $42,641$0$0196a6)Records of MonthlyFuel Use0.5$0$0126196 1,176 118 59 $127,922$0$02,352 dE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaRecordkeeping Subtotal14,112 1,411 706 $1,535,068 $4,223,800 $7,105,000 3,332gTotals30,478 3,048 1,524 $3,315,321 $6,085,800 $8,967,000 3,724b A one-time requirement.e Only the new large solid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrations.f It assumed that only new large solid fuel units will install fabric filters and utilize bag leak detection monitoring systems. New small units will use opacity monitoringg The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotald This NESHAP provides a compliance option for mercury from coal to conduct a fuel analysis once every five years, if a unit burns the same kind of fuel, or re-conduct a fuel analysis if a unit changes fuel type. All projected large solid fuel units expected to comply through stack testinginstead of the fuel testing compliance option, see note a for the derivation of the number of units per year.Table 7.B. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters - Year 2, New Small Solid Fuel Unitsc Subsequent annual testing in year 2 are based on the number of sources that had an initial test in year 1 of this ICR. Subsequent semi-annual compliance reporting and recordkeeping requirements are based on the number of new sources in years 1 and 2 of this ICR.a The total number of new small solid fuel boilers estimated in the first 3 years of this rule is 295. In order to calculate a per year estimate of the number of boilers required to meet these rule requirements, the number of projected boilers is divided by 3, or 98.3 rounded to 98 boilers peryear. 98 boilers will be accounted for in year 1 and 2 and 94 in year 3. Assuming 2 unit per facility, 49 new facilities will be subject in year 1 and 2 and 50 facilities in year 3.Burden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B)Stack Testand FuelAnalysis CostPerOccurrence(C)Non-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(D)Number ofOccurrencesPerRespondentPer Year(E)TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year(A XD)(F)Number ofRespondentsPer Year(G)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (FX G)(H)ClericalHoursper Year@$48.53(H X 0.1)(I)ManagementHoursper Year@$114.49(H X .05)(K) TotalLabor Costs PerYear(L) TotalNon-Labor CapitalCosts(M) TotalNon-Labor AnnualCost(N) TotalNumber ofResponses perYear (D X F) Footnotes1. Applications na2. Surveys and Studiesna3. ReportingRequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements40 $0 $0 1 40 50 2,000 200 100 $217,555 $0 $0 a, bB. Required Activities1. Initial Stack Test and Report(for PM)12 $8,000 $011299 1,188 119 59 $129,228 $792,000$0d2. Initial Stack Test and Report(for Hg)12 $5,000 $011299 1,188 119 59 $129,228 $495,000$0d3. Initial Performance Test and Report(for CO)12 $6,000 $011299 1,188 119 59 $129,228 $594,000$0d4. Annual Stack Test and Report(for PM)12 $8,000 $0112196 2,352 235 118 $255,845$0$1,568,000c,d5. Annual Stack Test and Report(for Hg)12 $5,000 $0112196 2,352 235 118 $255,845$0$980,000c,d6. Annual Performance Test and Report(for CO)12 $6,000 $0112196 2,352 235 118 $255,845$0$1,176,000c,d7. Initial Fuel Analysis for MercuryContent5 $200 $01500 0 0$0$0$0d8. Annual Fuel Analysis for MercuryContent5 $200 $01500 0 0$0$0$0c,d9. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoringplan(all)40$0$014050 2,000 200 100 $217,555$0$0cOpacitya)initia10$0 $43,100 11099 990 99 50 $107,690 $4,266,900 $4,266,900c,fb)annual10$0 $14,700 110294 2,940 294 147 $319,806$0$4,321,800c,fCO(onlysourcesgreater than 100 mmBtu/hr)a)initia10$0 $160,900 11000 0 0$0$0$0eb)annual10$0 $53,600 11000 0 0$0$0$0eBagLeak Detection System Operation(all sources that have fabric filters)a)initia10$0 $25,500 11000 0 0$0$0$0fb)annual10$0 $9,700 11000 0 0$0$0$0fD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparationna1)Initial Notification that Source is Subject2$0$01250 100 10 5 $10,878$0$050a, b2)Notification of Initial Stack Test8$0$01850 400 40 20 $43,511$0$050e3)Report Established Values for Site-specificOperating Parameters (all)see 3.E.64)Notification of Initial Compliance Status40$0$014050 2,000 200 100 $217,555$0$050a, b5)Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction Plan20$0$012050 1,000 100 50 $108,778$0$050a, d6)Semi-Annual Compliance Report20$0$0240148 5,920 592 296 $643,963$0$0296Reporting Subtotal22,040 2,204 1,102 $2,397,456 $1,881,000 $3,724,000 496g4. RecordkeepingRequirementsA. Read Instructionssee 3.AB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaD. Record Information1)Records of OperatingParameter Values20$0$0120295 5,900 590 295 $641,787$0$0295a2)Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction15$0$0115295 4,425 443 221 $481,340$0$0295a3)Records of Stack Tests2$0$012295 590 59 30 $64,179$0$0295a4)Records of MonitoringDevice Calibrations2$0$012295 590 59 30 $64,179$0$0295 e,a5)Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted2$0$024295 1,180 118 59 $128,357$0$0590a6)Records of MonthlyFuel Use0.5$0$0126295 1,770 177 89 $192,536$0$03,540 dE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaRecordkeeping Subtotal20,385 2,039 1,019 $2,217,429 $4,266,900 $8,588,700 5,310gTotals42,425 4,243 2,121 $4,614,885 $6,147,900 $12,312,700 5,806b A one-time requirement.e Only the new large solid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrations.f It assumed that only new large solid fuel units will install fabric filters and utilize bag leak detection monitoring systems. New small units will use opacity monitoringg The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotald This NESHAP provides a compliance option for mercury from coal to conduct a fuel analysis once every five years, if a unit burns the same kind of fuel, or re-conduct a fuel analysis if a unit changes fuel type. All projected large solid fuel units expected to comply through stack testinginstead of the fuel testing compliance option, see note a for the derivation of the number of units per year.Table 7.C. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters - Year 3, New Small Solid Fuel Unitsc Subsequent annual testing in year 3 are based on the number of sources that had an initial test in year 1 and 2 of this ICR. Subsequent semi-annual compliance reporting and recordkeeping requirements are based on the number of new sources in years 1-3 of this ICR.a The total number of new small solid fuel boilers estimated in the first 3 years of this rule is 295. In order to calculate a per year estimate of the number of boilers required to meet these rule requirements, the number of projected boilers is divided by 3, or 98.3 rounded to 98 boilers peryear. 98 boilers will be accounted for in year 1 and 2 and 94 in year 3. Assuming 2 unit per facility, 49 new facilities will be subject in year 1 and 2 and 50 facilities in year 3.Burden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B)Stack Testand FuelAnalysisCost PerOccurrence(C)Non-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(D)Number ofOccurrencesPerRespondentPer Year(E)TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year (AX D)(F)Number ofRespondentsPer Year(G)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (FX G)(H)ClericalHoursper Year@$48.53(H X 0.1)(I)ManagementHoursper Year@$114.49(H X .05)(K) TotalLabor Costs PerYear(L) TotalNon-Labor CapitalCosts(M) TotalNon-Labor AnnualCost(N) TotalNumber ofResponses perYear (D X F) Footnotes1. Applicationsna2. Surveys and Studiesna3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements40$0$0140990 39,600 3,960 1,980 $4,307,589$0$0a, bB. Required Activities1. Initial Stack Test and Report (for PM12 $8,000 $0112 1,979 23,748 2,375 1,187 $2,583,248 $15,832,000$0d2. Initial Performance Test and Report (for CO12 $6,000 $0112 1,979 23,748 2,375 1,187 $2,583,248 $11,874,000$0d3. Annual Stack Test and Report (for PM12 $8,000 $011200 0 0$0$0$0c,d4. Annual Performance Test and Report (for CO 12 $6,000 $011200 0 0$0$0$0c,d5. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoring plan (all40$0$0140990 39,600 3,960 1,980 $4,307,589$0$0cOpacitya) initia10$0 $43,100 110 1,947 19,470 1,947 974 $2,117,898 $83,915,700 $83,915,700c,fb) annua10$0 $14,700 110 1,947 19,470 1,947 974 $2,117,898$0$28,620,900c,fCO (only sources greater than 100 mmBtu/hra) initia10$0 $160,900 11000 0 0$0$0$0eb) annua10$0 $53,600 11000 0 0$0$0$0eBag Leak Detection System Operation(all sources that have fabric filters)a) initia10$0 $25,500 11083 830 83 42 $90,285 $2,116,500 $2,116,500fb) annua10$0 $9,700 11083 830 83 42 $90,285$0$805,100fD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparationna1) Initial Notification that Source is Subjec2$0$012990 1,980 198 99 $215,379$0$0990 a, b2) Notification of Initial Stack Test8$0$018990 7,920 792 396 $861,518$0$0990e3) Report Established Values for Site-specificOperating Parameters (all)see 3.E.64) Notification of Initial Compliance Status40$0$0140990 39,600 3,960 1,980 $4,307,589$0$0990 a, b5) Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction Plan20$0$0120990 19,800 1,980 990 $2,153,795$0$0990 a, d6) Semi-Annual Compliance Report20$0$0240990 39,600 3,960 1,980 $4,307,589$0$01,980Reporting Subtotal195,996 19,600 9,800 $21,319,955 $27,706,000$05,940 g4. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read Instructionssee 3.AB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaD. Record Information1) Records of Operating Parameter Values20$0$0120 1,979 39,580 3,958 1,979 $4,305,413$0$01,979 a2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction15$0$0115 1,979 29,685 2,969 1,484 $3,229,060$0$01,979 a3) Records of Stack Tests2$0$0121,979 3,958 396 198 $430,541$0$01,979 a4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations2$0$0121,979 3,958 396 198 $430,541$0$01,979 e,a5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted2$0$024990 3,960 396 198 $430,759$0$01,980 a6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use0.5$0$01261,979 11,874 1,187 594 $1,291,624$0$023,748 dE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaRecordkeeping Subtotal173,215 17,322 8,661 $18,841,895 $86,032,200 $115,458,200 33,644 gTotals369,211 36,921 18,461 $40,161,850 $113,738,200 $115,458,200 39,584b A one-time requirement.e Only the new large liquid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrations.f It assumed that only new large solid fuel units will install fabric filters and utilize bag leak detection monitoring systems. New small units will use opacity monitoringg The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotald Liquid units are not subject to a numerical limit for mercury and do not need to conduct mercury testing.Table 8.A. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters - Year 1, New Small Liquid Fuel Unitsc No annual test and reporting burden is shown in year 1 as this is the same year as the initial test and report.a The total number of new small solid fuel boilers estimated in the first 3years of this rule is 5,937. In order to calculate a peryear estimate of the number of boilers required to meet these rule requirements, the number of projected boilers is divided by3, or 1,979 boilers peryear. Assuming2unit per facility, 990 new facilities will be subject in year 1 and 2 and 989 facilities in year 3.Burden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B)Stack Testand FuelAnalysisCost PerOccurrence(C)Non-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(D)Number ofOccurrencesPerRespondentPer Year(E)TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year (AX D)(F)Number ofRespondentsPer Year(G)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (FX G)(H)ClericalHoursper Year@$48.53(H X 0.1)(I)ManagementHoursper Year@$114.49(H X .05)(K)Total LaborCosts Per Year(L) TotalNon-Labor CapitalCosts(M)Total Non-LaborAnnual Cost(N) TotalNumber ofResponses perYear (D X F) Footnotes1. Applications na2. Surveys and Studies na3. Reporting RequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements 40 $0 $0 1 40 990 39,600 3,960 1,980 $4,307,589 $0 $0 a, bB. Required Activities1. Initial Stack Test and Report (for PM) 12 $8,000 $0 1 12 1,979 23,748 2,375 1,187 $2,583,248 $15,832,000 $0 d2. Initial Performance Test and Report (for CO) 12 $6,000 $0 1 12 1,979 23,748 2,375 1,187 $2,583,248 $11,874,000 $0 d3. Annual Stack Test and Report (for PM) 12 $8,000 $0 1 12 1,979 23,748 2,375 1,187 $2,583,248 $0 $15,832,000 c,d4. Annual Performance Test and Report (for CO) 12 $6,000 $0 1 12 1,979 23,748 2,375 1,187 $2,583,248 $0 $11,874,000 c,d5. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoring plan (all) 40 $0 $0 1 40 990 39,600 3,960 1,980 $4,307,589 $0 $0 cOpacitya) initial 10 $0 $43,100 1 10 1,947 19,470 1,947 974 $2,117,898 $83,915,700 $83,915,700 c,fb) annual10$0 $14,700 110 3,894 38,940 3,894 1,947 $4,235,796$0$57,241,800c,fCO (only sources greater than 100 mmBtu/hr)a) initial 10 $0 $160,900 1 10 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 eb) annual 10 $0 $53,600 1 10 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 eBag Leak Detection System Operation(all sources that have fabric filters)a) initial 10 $0 $25,500 1 10 83 830 83 42 $90,285 $2,116,500 $2,116,500fb) annual10$0 $9,700 110166 1,660 166 83 $180,571$0$1,610,200fD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparationna1) Initial Notification that Source is Subject2$0$012990 1,980 198 99 $215,379$0$0990 a, b2) Notification of Initial Stack Test8$0$018990 7,920 792 396 $861,518$0$0990e3) Report Established Values for Site-specificOperating Parameters (all)see 3.E.64) Notification of Initial Compliance Status40$0$0140990 39,600 3,960 1,980 $4,307,589$0$0990 a, b5) Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction Plan20$0$0120990 19,800 1,980 990 $2,153,795$0$0990 a, d6) Semi-Annual Compliance Report20$0$0240 1,980 79,200 7,920 3,960 $8,615,178$0$03,960Reporting Subtotal283,092 28,309 14,155 $30,794,040 $27,706,000 $27,706,000 7,920 g4. Recordkeeping RequirementsA. Read Instructions see 3.AB. Implement Activities naC. Develop Record System naD. Record Information1) Records of Operating Parameter Values 20 $0 $0 1 20 3,958 79,160 7,916 3,958 $8,610,827 $0 $0 3,958 a2) Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction 15 $0 $0 1 15 3,958 59,370 5,937 2,969 $6,458,120 $0 $0 3,958 a3) Records of Stack Tests 2 $0 $0 1 2 3,958 7,916 792 396 $861,083 $0 $0 3,958 a4) Records of Monitoring Device Calibrations 2 $0 $0 1 2 3,958 7,916 792 396 $861,083 $0 $0 3,958 e,a5) Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted 2 $0 $0 2 4 1,980 7,920 792 396 $861,518 $0 $0 3,960 a6) Records of Monthly Fuel Use 0.5 $0 $0 12 6 3,958 23,748 2,375 1,187 $2,583,248 $0 $0 47,496 dE. Personnel Training naF. Time for Audits naRecordkeeping Subtotal286,530 28,653 14,327 $31,168,017 $86,032,200 $144,884,200 67,288 gTotals569,622 56,962 28,481 $61,962,057 $113,738,200 $172,590,200 75,208b A one-time requirement.Table 8.B. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters - Year 2, New Small Liquid Fuel Unitsa The total number of new small solid fuel boilers estimated in the first 3 years of this rule is 5,937. In order to calculate a per year estimate of the number of boilers required to meet these rule requirements, the number of projected boilers is divided by 3, or 1,979 boilers per year.Assuming 2 unit per facility, 990 new facilities will be subject in year 1 and 2 and 989 facilities in year 3.c Subsequent annual testing in year 2 are based on the number of sources that had an initial test in year 1 of this ICR. Subsequent semi-annual compliance reporting and recordkeeping requirements are based on the number of new sources in years 1 and 2 of this ICR.e Only the new large liquid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrations.f It assumed that only new large solid fuel units will install fabric filters and utilize bag leak detection monitoring systems. New small units will use opacity monitoringg The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotald Liquid units are not subject to a numerical limit for mercury and do not need to conduct mercury testing.Burden Item(A)RespondentHours perOccurrence(Technicalhours)(B)Stack Testand FuelAnalysis CostPerOccurrence(C)Non-LaborCosts PerOccurrence(D)Number ofOccurrencesPerRespondentPer Year(E)TechnicalHours perRespondentPer Year(A XD)(F)Number ofRespondentsPer Year(G)TechnicalHours perYear @$98.20 (FX G)(H)ClericalHours perYear @$48.53(HX 0.1)(I)ManagementHoursper Year@$114.49(H X .05)(K)TotalLabor Costs PerYear(L) TotalNon-Labor CapitalCosts(M) TotalNon-Labor AnnualCost(N) TotalNumber ofResponses perYear (D X F) Footnotes1. Applications na2. Surveys and Studiesna3. ReportingRequirementsA. Read and Understand Rule Requirements40 $0 $0 1 40 989 39,560 3,956 1,978 $4,303,238 $0 $0 a, bB. Required Activities1. Initial Stack Test and Report(for PM)12 $8,000 $0112 1,979 23,748 2,375 1,187 $2,583,248 $15,832,000$0d2. Initial Performance Test and Report(for CO)12 $6,000 $0112 1,979 23,748 2,375 1,187 $2,583,248 $11,874,000$0d3. Annual Stack Test and Report(for PM)12 $8,000 $0112 3,958 47,496 4,750 2,375 $5,166,496$0$31,664,000c,d4. Annual Performance Test and Report(for CO)12 $6,000 $0112 3,958 47,496 4,750 2,375 $5,166,496$0$23,748,000c,d5. Continuous Parameter MonitoringEstablish Site-specific monitoringplan(all)40$0$0140989 39,560 3,956 1,978 $4,303,238$0$0cOpacitya)initia10$0 $43,100 110 1,947 19,470 1,947 974 $2,117,898 $83,915,700 $83,915,700c,fb)annual10$0 $14,700 110 5,841 58,410 5,841 2,921 $6,353,694$0$85,862,700c,fCO(onlysourcesgreater than 100 mmBtu/hr)a)initia10$0 $160,900 11000 0 0$0$0$0eb)annual10$0 $53,600 11000 0 0$0$0$0eBag Leak Detection System Operation(all sources that have fabric filters)a)initia10$0 $25,500 11083 830 83 42 $90,285 $2,116,500 $2,116,500fb)annual10$0 $9,700 110249 2,490 249 125 $270,856$0$2,415,300fD. Gather InformationnaE. Report Preparationna1)Initial Notification that Source is Subject2$0$012989 1,978 198 99 $215,162$0$0989 a, b2)Notification of Initial Stack Test8$0$018989 7,912 791 396 $860,648$0$0989e3)Report Established Values for Site-specificOperating Parameters (all)see 3.E.64)Notification of Initial Compliance Status40$0$0140989 39,560 3,956 1,978 $4,303,238$0$0989 a, b5)Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction Plan20$0$0120989 19,780 1,978 989 $2,151,619$0$0989 a, d6)Semi-Annual Compliance Report20$0$0240 2,970 118,800 11,880 5,940 $12,922,767$0$05,940Reporting Subtotal370,078 37,008 18,504 $40,256,160 $27,706,000 $55,412,000 9,896g4. RecordkeepingRequirementsA. Read Instructionssee 3.AB. Implement ActivitiesnaC. Develop Record SystemnaD. Record Information1)Records of OperatingParameter Values20$0$0120 5,937 118,740 11,874 5,937 $12,916,240$0$05,937 a2)Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction15$0$0115 5,937 89,055 8,906 4,453 $9,687,180$0$05,937 a3)Records of Stack Tests2$0$0125,937 11,874 1,187 594 $1,291,624$0$05,937 a4)Records of MonitoringDevice Calibrations2$0$0125,937 11,874 1,187 594 $1,291,624$0$05,937 e,a5)Records of All Compliance Reports Submitted2$0$0242,970 11,880 1,188 594 $1,292,277$0$05,940 a6)Records of MonthlyFuel Use0.5$0$01265,937 35,622 3,562 1,781 $3,874,872$0$071,244 dE. Personnel TrainingnaF. Time for AuditsnaRecordkeeping Subtotal399,805 39,981 19,990 $43,489,788 $86,032,200 $174,310,200 100,932gTotals769,883 76,988 38,494 $83,745,948 $113,738,200 $229,722,200 110,828b A one-time requirement.e Only the new large liquid fuel units with a rated heat input capacity of 100 mmBtu/hr or greater are subject to continuous monitoring requirements and records of monitoring device calibrations.f It assumed that only new large solid fuel units will install fabric filters and utilize bag leak detection monitoring systems. New small units will use opacity monitoringg The burdens for monitoring are included in the recordkeeping subtotald Liquid units are not subject to a numerical limit for mercury and do not need to conduct mercury testing.Table 8.C. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for the National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters - Year 3, New Small Liquid Fuel Unitsc Subsequent annual testing in year 3 are based on the number of sources that had an initial test in year 1 and 2 of this ICR. Subsequent semi-annual compliance reporting and recordkeeping requirements are based on the number of new sources in years 1-3 of this ICR.a The total number of new small solid fuel boilers estimated in the first 3 years of this rule is 5,937. In order to calculate a per year estimate of the number of boilers required to meet these rule requirements, the number of projected boilers is divided by 3, or 1,979 boilers per year.Assuming 2 unit per facility, 990 new facilities will be subject in year 1 and 2 and 989 facilities in year 3.Burden ItemEPA hoursperoccurrence(A)Number ofoccurrencesper year (B)EPA hours peroccurrence peryear (C=AxB)Technicalhours peryear (D=C)Mangmthours peryear(E=Dx0.05)Clericalhours peryear(F=Dx0.1) (H) Costs, $L Footnotes1. Read and understand rule requirements40 60 2,400 2,400 120 240 $124,379a2.2 92,467 184,933 184,933 9,247 18,493 $9,584,060b3. Required activitiesA. Observe initial stack/performance test40 917 36,672 36,672 1,834 3,667 $1,900,508cB. Observe repeat performance test40 458 18,336 18,336 917 1,834 $950,254dC. Review operating parameters2 7,818 15,636 15,636 782 1,564 $810,328eD. Review continuous parameter monitoring2 2,260 4,520 4,520 226 452 $234,247f4 Excess Emissions Enforcement Activities and Inspections24 458 0 0 0 0 $0g5 Notification requirementsA.2 92,467 184,933 184,933 9,247 18,493 $9,584,060bB.20 7,818 156,360 156,360 7,818 15,636 $8,103,279eC. Review notification of compliance status2 1,130 2,260 2,260 113 226 $117,123b6. Reporting requirements0 0 0 0 $0A. Review semiannual compliance report4 2,260 9,040 9,040 452 904 $468,493hB. Review biennial compliance report4 0 0 0 0 0 $0iC. Review initial report on results of energy audit2 0 0 0 0 0 $0j7. Travel Expenses for Tests Attended$1,518,221kTOTAL BURDEN AND COST (SALARY)615,090 30,755 61,509$33,394,953TOTAL ANNUAL HOURS707,354a Number of occurrences is the number of states where affected sources will exist and each EPA Region (50 states + 10 EPA regions = 60 respondents).d Number of occurrences is based on the assumption that of the units that test in year 1, 10% will have to retest and EPA personnel will observe all these retests.e Number of occurrences is based on the number of units that will test and set/submit operating limits in year 1 (in year 1 only new boilers in new large and small solid and liquid subcategories).f Number of occurrences begins in year 3 for existing units and in year 1 for new units and is based on the number of units maintaining records of control device parameters.g Number of occurrences is based on the assumption that of the new units in year 1 that test, 10% of them will have exceedances and need enforcement.i Number of occurrences is the number of units in year 1 that will submit these biennial compliance reports (existing small solid and liquid subcategories).j Energy audits only occur at existing facilities with large units.Table 9.A. Annual Federal Government Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reportingfor the Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Source NESHAP Subpart JJJJJJ- Year 1 - First Year After Promulgationb Number of occurrences is based on the total number of affected facilities in year 1 that are required to submit initial notifications stated they are subject to the standard (all new boilers in the large and small solid andliquid subcategories, plus all existing large and small solid and liquid subcategories). For initial notifications of compliance status, the number of occurrences is based on all new boilers in the large and small solid andliquid subcategories, existing large and small solid and liquid units have until year 3 to submit this notification.k Total cost is based on the number of trips taken by EPA to observe performance tests in year 1 (4.A. & 4.B.) multiplied by $1104 per trip. The source for hotel and meals/incidental costs is based on FY' 10 per diemrates, averaged across all locations in the United States. Airfares are estimated based on experience from other rulemakings. See:http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?contentId=17943&contentType=GSA_BASICL These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2010 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packagesavailable to government employees. These rates can be obtained from the OPM web site, http//www.opm.gov/oca/payrates/index/htm.3 days * ($110 hotel + $58 meals/incidentals) + ($600 roundtrip) = $1104 per tripEnter and update information into agency recordkeepingsystemReview notification of initial performance tests and reviewtest planReview initial notification that sources are subject to thestandardc Number of occurrences is based on the assumption that EPA personnel will observe 20% of the initial performance tests that occur in year 1 (in year 1 only boilers in new large and small solid and liquid subcategoriestest).h Number of occurrences is the number of projected new units in years 1, 2, and 3 that will submit these semi-annual compliance reports (new units in the large and small solid and liquid subcategories) as well asexisting large solid and liquid units that will begin to submit compliance reports in year 3.Burden ItemEPA hoursperoccurrence(A)Number ofoccurrencesper year (B)EPA hours peroccurrence peryear (C=AxB)Technicalhours peryear (D=C)Mangmthours peryear(E=Dx0.05)Clericalhours peryear(F=Dx0.1) (H) Costs, $L Footnotes1. Read and understand rule requirements40 0 0 0 0 0 $0a2.2 2,260 4,520 4,520 226 452 $234,247b3. Required activitiesA. Observe initial stack/performance test40 2,282 91,296 91,296 4,565 9,130 $4,731,370cB. Observe repeat performance test40 1,141 45,648 45,648 2,282 4,565 $2,365,685dC. Review operating parameters2 11,412 22,824 22,824 1,141 2,282 $1,182,842eD. Review continuous parameter monitoring2 4,519 9,038 9,038 452 904 $468,390f4 Excess Emissions Enforcement Activities and Inspections24 1,141 0 0 0 0 $0g5 Notification requirementsA.2 2,260 4,520 4,520 226 452 $234,247bB.20 11,412 228,240 228,240 11,412 22,824 $11,828,424eC. Review notification of compliance status2 1,130 2,260 2,260 113 226 $117,123b6. Reporting requirements0 0 0 0 $0A. Review semiannual compliance report4 2,260 9,040 9,040 452 904 $468,493hB. Review biennial compliance report4 0 0 0 0 0 $0iC. Review initial report on results of energy audit2 0 0 0 0 0 $0j7. Travel Expenses for Tests Attended$3,779,654kTOTAL BURDEN AND COST (SALARY)417,386 20,869 41,739$25,410,475TOTAL ANNUAL HOURS479,994a Number of occurrences is the number of states where affected sources will exist and each EPA Region (50 states + 10 EPA regions = 60 respondents).d Number of occurrences is based on the assumption that of the units that test in year 1, 10% will have to retest and EPA personnel will observe all these retests.e Number of occurrences is based on the number of units that will test and set/submit operating limits in year 1 (in year 1 only new boilers in new large and small solid and liquid subcategories).f Number of occurrences begins in year 3 for existing units and in year 1 for new units and is based on the number of units maintaining records of control device parameters.g Number of occurrences is based on the assumption that of the new units in year 1 that test, 10% of them will have exceedances and need enforcement.i Number of occurrences is the number of units in year 2 that will submit these biennial compliance reports (existing small solid and liquid subcategories).j Energy audits only occur at existing facilities with large units.Table 9.B. Annual Federal Government Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reportingfor the Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Source NESHAP Subpart JJJJJJ- Year 2 - Second Year After Promulgation3 days * ($110 hotel + $58 meals/incidentals) + ($600 roundtrip) = $1104 per tripEnter and update information into agency recordkeepingReview initial notification that sources are subject to thestandardReview notification of initial performance tests andreview test planp jy ,,p p (gq g )existing large solid and liquid units that will begin to submit compliance reports in year 3.b Number of occurrences is based on the total number of affected facilities in year 1 that are required to submit initial notifications stated they are subject to the standard (all new boilers in the large and small solidand liquid subcategories, plus all existing large and small solid and liquid subcategories). For initial notifications of compliance status, the number of occurrences is based on all new boilers in the large and smallsolid and liquid subcategories, existing large and small solid and liquid units have until year 3 to submit this notification.c Number of occurrences is based on the assumption that EPA personnel will observe 20% of the initial performance tests that occur in year 1 (in year 1 only boilers in new large and small solid and liquidsubcategories test).Burden ItemEPA hoursperoccurrence(A)Number ofoccurrencesper year (B)EPA hours peroccurrence peryear (C=AxB)Technicalhours peryear (D=C)Mangmthours peryear(E=Dx0.05)Clericalhours peryear(F=Dx0.1) (H) Costs, $k Footnotes1. Read and understand rule requirements40 0 0 0 0 0 $0a2.2 2,262 4,524 4,524 226 452 $234,454b3. Required activitiesA. Observe initial stack/performance test40 2,283 91,336 91,336 4,567 9,134 $4,733,443cB. Observe repeat performance test40 1,142 45,668 45,668 2,283 4,567 $2,366,721dC. Review operating parameters2 11,417 22,834 22,834 1,142 2,283 $1,183,361eD. Review continuous parameter monitoring2 10,819 21,638 21,638 1,082 2,164 $1,121,379f4 Excess Emissions Enforcement Activities and Inspections24 1,142 0 0 0 0 $0g5 Notification requirementsA.2 2,262 4,524 4,524 226 452 $234,454bB.20 11,417 228,340 228,340 11,417 22,834 $11,833,606eC. Review notification of compliance status2 92,468 184,936 184,936 9,247 18,494 $9,584,216b6. Reporting requirements0 0 0 0 $0A. Review semiannual compliance report4 3,392 13,568 13,568 678 1,357 $703,155hB. Review biennial compliance report4 84,702 338,806 338,806 16,940 33,881 $17,558,452iC. Review initial report on results of energy audit2 6,635 13,270 13,270 664 1,327 $687,711j7. Travel Expenses for Tests Attended$3,781,310kTOTAL BURDEN AND COST (SALARY)969,444 48,472 96,944$54,022,261TOTAL ANNUAL HOURS1,114,861a Number of occurrences is zero, as this burden was a one time requirement and it was assigned to year 1.d Number of occurrences is based on the assumption that of the units that test in year 3, 10% will have to retest and EPA personnel will observe all these retests.e Number of occurrences is based on the number of units that will test and set/submit operating limits in year 3 (in year 3 only boilers in new large and small solid and liquid and half of existing large solid and liquid subcatg Number of occurrences is based on the assumption that of the new units in year 3 that test, 10% of them will have exceedances and need enforcement.i Number of occurrences is the number of units in year 3 that will submit these biennial compliance reports (existing small solid and liquid subcategories).Table 9.C. Annual Federal Government Burden and Cost of Recordkeeping and Reportingfor the Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Source NESHAP Subpart JJJJJJ- Year 3 - Third Year After Promulgation3 days * ($110 hotel + $58 meals/incidentals) + ($600 roundtrip) = $1104 per tripReview notification of initial performance tests and review testplanReview initial notification that sources are subject to thestandardEnter and update information into agency recordkeeping systemb Number of occurrences is based on the total number of affected facilities in year 3 that are required to submit initial notifications (all new boilers in the large and small solid and liquid subcategories).f Number of occurrences begins in year 3 for existing units and in year 1 for new units and is based on the number of units maintaining records of control device parameters.c Number of occurrences is based on the assumption that EPA personnel will observe 20% of the initial performance tests that occur in year 3 (in year 3 only boilers in new large and small solid and liquid subcategoriestest).h Number of occurrences is the number of projected new units in years 1, 2, and 3 that will submit these semi-annual compliance reports (new units in the large and small solid and liquid subcategories) as well asexisting large solid and liquid units that will begin to submit compliance reports in year 3.j Energy audits only occur at existing facilities with large units.L These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2010 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packagesavailable to government employees. These rates can be obtained from the OPM web site, http//www.opm.gov/oca/payrates/index/htm.k Total cost is based on the number of trips taken by EPA to observe performance tests in year 1 (4.A. & 4.B.) multiplied by $1104 per trip. The source for hotel and meals/incidental costs is based on FY' 10 per diemrates, averaged across all locations in the United States. Airfares are estimated based on experience from other rulemakings. See:http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?contentId=17943&contentType=GSA_BASIC