alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 58140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23056]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS12-17]

Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104 (b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: FDIC--550 17th Street NW., Room MB-5085, Washington, DC 
20429.
    Date: September 27, 2012.
    Time: 1:30 p.m.
    Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered

Summary Agenda

    August 8, 2012 minutes--Open Session.
    (No substantive discussion of the above items is anticipated. These 
matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the ASC 
requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.)

Discussion Agenda

Appraisal Foundation FY13 Grant Proposal
ASC FY13 Operating Plan
ASC FY13 Proposed Budget
Appraisal Foundation June 2012 Grant Reimbursement Request
ASC Policy for Monitoring Appraisal Requirements

How To Attend and Observe an ASC meeting

    Email your name, organization and contact information to 
meetings@asc.gov.
    You may also send a written request via U.S. Mail, fax or 
commercial carrier to the Executive Director of the ASC, 1401 H Street 
NW., Ste 760, Washington, DC 20005. The fax number is 202-289-4101. 
Your request must be received no later than 4:30 p.m., ET, on the 
Monday prior to the meeting. Attendees must have a valid government-
issued photo ID and must agree to submit to reasonable security 
measures. The meeting space is intended to accommodate public 
attendees. However, if the space will not accommodate all requests, the 
ASC may refuse attendance on that reasonable basis. The use of any 
video or audio tape recording device, photographing device, or any 
other electronic or mechanical device designed for similar purposes is 
prohibited at ASC meetings.

    Dated: September 14, 2012.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-23056 Filed 9-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
# C_2009069EN.01005304.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/53

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 3 February 2009 — Comtec Translations v Commission

(Case T-239/08) (1)

1

(2009/C 69/118)

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 15.8.2008.

1

---
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 99-11263

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

KATHERINE FURLEY,

also known as Katherine

Hackleman,

Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee,

TIM DEAN, Individually and

as next friend on behalf of

James Randolph Dean,

Movant-Appellant,

versus

ALEDO INDEPENDENT 

SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:99-CV-416-A

May 23, 2000

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
* Pursuant to 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

-2-

PER CURIAM:*

Katherine Furley appeals the district court’s dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit for failure to state a

claim. The district court did not err in dismissing Furley’s suit. See Doe v. Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist., 168 F.3d

806, 819-22 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. granted, 120 S. Ct. 494 (1999). The district court also did not abuse its

discretion in denying her motion to amend her complaint, as her claims were foreclosed by Doe and thus were

futile. See Leffall v. Dallas Indep. Sch. Dist., 28 F.3d 521, 524 (5th Cir. 1994). Because Furley’s suit was

dismissed, the district court also did not err in denying as moot Tim Dean’s motion to intervene in the suit. See

Flory v. United States, 79 F.3d 24, 26 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
# C_2009233EN.01001602.xml

| 26.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/16

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 July 2009 — Hoo Hing v OHIM — Tresplain Investments (Golden Elephant Brand)

(Case T-300/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Article 63(4) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 65(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Act which upheld the applicant’s claims in their entirety - Inadmissibility)

2009/C 233/29

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hoo Hing Holdings Ltd (Romford, Essex, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Edenborough, barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Novais Gonçalves, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Tresplain Investments Ltd (Tsing Yi, Hong Kong) (represented by: D. McFarland, barrister)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 May 2008 (case R 889/2007-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Hoo Hing Holdings Ltd and Tresplain Investments Ltd.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Hoo Hing Holdings Ltd is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Hoo Hing Holdings Ltd is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.9.2008.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 25, 2013

s0617

Order 

Clerk

June 25, 2013

146578

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146578

COA: 312784

Kent CC: 08-013299-FC

BOBBY ALLEN WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 28, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
02/21/2013 18:00 FAX 2024935142 FAA 

Law Offices 

411 Aviation Way, Suite 245 

Frederick, MD 21701 

JOHNS. YODICE 

HONALD D. GO!.DEN 

KATHLEEN A. YODICI: 

Offir;e: (301} 695-2300 FAX: (301} 695-2151 

www.yodice.com 

TAL60T M. MARTINT 

MICHAEL A. YODICE 

PARALFGAL 

.£ebruary 15, 2013 . _ 

The Honorable Judge J.E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: In the Matter of Clifford Press, Docket No. FAA-201 1-1006 

Dear Judge Sullivan: 

~ OMS @001/001 

RAYMOND C. SPECIALE 

LEONARD CERUZZI~ 

ELIZABETH M. CANDF.LARIO •• 

OF COUN5CL 

l' :• 

TCA&DC; ,(1 UNLY; 

-·PA&I.l( 

c::: ( •. :· 

I am in receipt of your Notice of Pre-Hearing Status Conference, such conference to be held at 10:00 on 

Thursday, February 21, 2013. I am scheduled to be out of town during the week of February 19111 at a 

legal conference, but I will make myself available by cell phona for the conference, or I may make a 

member of my firm available on a land-line, if you prefer. 

I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. 

s~~:~ J)j;~~ c..-~·--- oun~=~ord Press 

cc: FAA Hearing Docket (original) 

Judith Vaughan, FAA Attorney 

RECEIVED 

FEB 2 1 2013 

HEARING DOCKET
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5710]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. ISRAEL:
       H.R. 6332.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 of the United States 
     Constitution.
```
LARRY LEGEL, CPA

Practice Concentrating in
Taxation and Securities

800 W. Cypress Creek Road, Suite 470
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309

Tel: (954) 493-8900
Fax: (954) 493-8300
e-mail: legelcpa@bellsouth.net

ACCOUNTANT'S REVIEW REPORT

Shareholders
Bernard, Allan & Edwards, Inc.
Leesburg, FL


I have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Bernard, Allan & Edwards, Inc. as of and for the periods ending
September 30, 2003 and 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, and shareholders'equity and cash flows
for three months ending September 30, 2003 and 2004 in
accordance with standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  All information included in these
financial statements is the representation of the management of
Bernard, Allan & Edwards, Inc.

A review consists principally of inquiries of company personnel and
analytical procedures applied to financial data. It is substantially
less in scope than an audit in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards, the objective of which is the expression of an
opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, I do not express such an opinion.

Based on my review, I am not aware of any material modifications
that should be made to the accompanying financial statements in
order for them to be in conformity with Accounting Principles
Generally Accepted in the United States.




/s/Larry Legel, CPA

November 11, 2004
Ft Lauderdale, FL
EXHIBIT 23.1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6153]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following 
communication from the Speaker:

                                               Washington, DC,

                                               September 20, 2012.
       I hereby appoint the Honorable Jeff Flake to act as Speaker 
     pro tempore on this day.
                                                  John A. Boehner,
     Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                          ____________________
```
October 2, 2015

Ms. Jayme Evans

Owner

Evans Above Imaging

6400NE Highway, Suite G

PMB 350

Vancouver, WA 98665

Dear Ms. Evans:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

part 21; §§ 45.23(b), 61.23(a) and (b), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.103(b), 

91.109, 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your June 10, 2015, exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2889, 

but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
|   | (1)    |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|   | (2)    |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|   Date: August 14,      2009 |   |                                                       |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                   |   | /s/      Marcel Noordeloos                                 |   |   |
|                                   |   | Marcel      NoordeloosInterim      Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4998 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure health insurance 

coverage continuity for former foster youth. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2018 

Ms. BASS (for herself, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Ms. CLARKE of 

New York, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure 

health insurance coverage continuity for former foster youth. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Insurance for 

5 Former Foster Youth Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4998 IH

1 SEC. 2. COVERAGE CONTINUITY FOR FORMER FOSTER 

2 CARE CHILDREN UP TO AGE 26. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(IX) of 

4 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 1396a(a)(10)(A)(i)(IX)) is amended— 

6 (1) in item (bb)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘are not described in or en8 rolled under’’ and inserting ‘‘are not described 

9 in and are not enrolled under’’; and 

10 (B) by striking the semicolon at the end 

11 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; 

12 (2) in item (cc), by striking ‘‘responsibility of 

13 the State’’ and all that follows through 

14 ‘‘475(8)(B)(iii); and’’ and inserting ‘‘responsibility 

15 of a State on the date of attaining 18 years of age 

16 (or such higher age as such State has elected under 

17 section 475(8)(B)(iii)), or who were in such care on 

18 the date of attaining 14 years of age but subse19 quently left such care to enter into a legal guardian20 ship with a kinship caregiver (without regard to 

21 whether kinship guardianship payments are being 

22 made on behalf of the child under this part)’’; and 

23 (3) by striking item (dd). 

24 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

25 this section shall take effect on the date of enactment of 

26 this Act. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4998 IH

1 SEC. 3. OUTREACH EFFORTS FOR ENROLLMENT OF 

2 FORMER FOSTER CHILDREN. 

3 Section 1902(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

4 1396a(a)) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (82), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and 

6 inserting a semicolon; 

7 (2) in paragraph (83), by striking the period at 

8 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

9 (3) by inserting after paragraph (83) the fol10 lowing new paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(84) not later than January 1, 2019, establish 

12 an outreach and enrollment program, in coordination 

13 with the State agency responsible for administering 

14 the State plan under part E of title IV and any 

15 other appropriate or interested agencies, designed to 

16 increase the enrollment of individuals who are eligi17 ble for medical assistance under the State plan 

18 under paragraph (10)(A)(i)(IX) in accordance with 

19 best practices established by the Secretary.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
# Emissions Defect Information Report (EDIR Number: 2011.02.11.02) Manufacturer: Hyundai Motor Company A description of the defect. Some Hyundai Santa Fe 2.4L vehicles equipped with 2.4 liter engines have experienced a malfunction indicator light (MIL) illumination with a diagnostic trouble code PO441 set, indicating evaporative emission system incorrect purge flow. This is due to improper programming of the PCM threshold for a malfunction. To correct this problem, l l yundai will reprogram the PCM as necessary. 3. A description of vehicles potentially affected by the defect.

Make Model Model Year Test Group HyundaiSanta Fe 2.4L 2010 AHYXT02.4CW5 2011 BHYXT02.4CW5 4. The number of vehicles known or estimated to have the defect. Unscreened claims of the affected vehicles are listed below for reference.

Model Year Test Group d nscreene U Unscreened

U Sales Volume Claims Claim Rate 2010AI IYXT02.4CW5 63 0.17 % 36,714

t HYXT02.4CW5 0 0.00 % 16,637 2011 The address of the involved plant: Montgomery & Georgia Plant, USA An evaluation of the emissions and driveability impact of the defect. As this is a "false MIL" condition, this issue does not affect vehicle emission performance or driveability. 6. Available emissions data which relate to the defect. No specific test data is available. 7. An indication of any anticipated manufacturer follow-up. Iyundai will publish a Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) to provide repair information to yundai dealers for this condition, and will reprogram affected power-train control units.

2011-02-17 05:11 / This document is the intellectual propeily of HATC1. You may not copy or distribute it without written permission. Violation of this rule will subject you to criminal and civil liability.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.15

                         RTI International Metals, Inc.
                     Board of Directors Compensation Program
                            Effective January 1, 2004


o    Target compensation of $60,000. Paid 50% in restricted stock and 50% in
     cash. No fees for regular board or committee meetings.

o    Premiums for committee chairs:

         - Audit - $10,000
         - Other - $ 5,000

o    Meeting fees for extraordinarily frequent Board meetings (required to
     consider transactions or other special circumstances, as determined by the
     Chairman): $1,000 per meeting. (Note: Usage of this feature is expected to
     be extremely infrequent.)

o    Committee chair fees. The cash portion of target compensation and special
     meeting fees are payable in cash quarterly.

o    Restricted stock will be awarded at beginning of a plan year (commencing
     with annual shareholders' meeting) and vest at end of plan year. Partial
     vesting for directors who leave before their term is up will be at
     discretion of HR Committee of Board.

o    Restricted stock will be held in custody by RTI until restriction is
     terminated and then a certificate, free of all restrictions, shall be
     issued in the Grantee's name (or a trust as he or she shall designate).
     Grantee shall be entitled to vote the restricted stock.



Expected share ownership of 10,000 shares to be reached within three years after
joining the Board or adoption of plan.



Adopted by the Board of Directors:  January 30, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT (10)(aa)

                           J. Alexander's Corporation
                             2005 Executive Salaries

The base salaries of the persons who are anticipated to constitute the Company's
named executive officers for 2005 were approved effective January 1, 2005, as
follows:

<TABLE>
<S>                     <C>
Lonnie J. Stout II      $340,000
R. Gregory Lewis        $171,600
J. Michael Moore        $137,000
Mark A. Parkey          $132,700
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Nicole S. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



|Date: November 13, 2003 |  | /s/ Nicole S. Williams 
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | Nicole S. Williams     
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Docket No: FAA-2015-3629 Docket No: 2015-NM-011-AD

FAA MCAI AD WORKSHEET (CONTINUED)

. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 1/22/15

Regional Airline Association 1/22/15

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 1/22/15

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 1/22/15
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick L.Alexander, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.
|  /s/ Patrick L. Alexander |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|

Patrick L. Alexander

Chief Executive Officer

May 11, 2007

1

----