alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1592]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 HONORING CHAIRMAN STANLEY CROOKS, SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

                                  _____
                                 

                          HON. BETTY McCOLLUM

                              of minnesota

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Speaker, I would like to take this opportunity to 
honor the life of Chairman Stanley Crooks of the Shakopee Mdewakanton 
Sioux Community. With the passing of Chairman Crooks on Saturday, 
August 25, the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community, Minnesota and 
America lost a transformative and highly respected leader.
  Chairman Crooks lived his life serving our nation, the residents of 
Minnesota and the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community. A proud veteran 
of the United States Navy, Chairman Crooks was first elected chairman 
of the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community in 1992. During his decades 
of leadership, he earned national renown for his eloquent and effective 
defense of tribal sovereignty.
  Chairman Crooks never missed an opportunity to reach out to less 
fortunate communities or to speak out on their behalf. He touched lives 
in a way that provided hope, opportunity, and dignity to Native 
American families and communities in need. He was a visionary and a 
proud leader, and his mentorship inspired a generation that will 
continue his work for Indian country. Those who knew him well share a 
tremendous appreciation, respect and fondness for him. I am grateful 
that he was always ready to lend a hand and to share with me his 
experience and wisdom regarding tribal issues.
  Mr. Speaker, the entire Congressional delegation from Minnesota 
extends our deepest sympathies to Chairman Crooks' family, including 
Cheryl, his wife of 48 years, as well as the entire Shakopee 
Mdewakanton Sioux Community, and all who encountered his generosity and 
profound spirit. Please join us in honoring the life of this great 
leader.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6446]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           MESSAGE FROM THE HOUSE RECEIVED DURING ADJOURNMENT

  Under the authority of the order of the Senate of January 5, 2011, 
the Secretary of the Senate, on September 14, 2012, during the 
adjournment of the Senate, received a message from the House of 
Representatives announcing that the House has passed the following 
bills, without amendment:

       S. 3245. An act to extend by 3 years the authorization of 
     the EB-5 Regional Center Program, the E-Verify Program, the 
     Special Immigrant Nonminister Religious Worker Program, and 
     the Conrad State 30 J-1 Visa Waiver Program.
       S. 3552. An act to reauthorize the Federal Insecticide, 
     Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.

                          Enrolled Bill Signed

  Under the authority of the order of the Senate of January 5, 2011, 
the following enrolled bill, previously signed by the Speaker of the 
House, was signed on September 14, 2012, during the adjournment of the 
Senate, by the President pro tempore (Mr. Inouye).

       H.R. 6336. An act to direct the Joint Committee on the 
     Library to accept a statue depicting Frederick Douglass from 
     the District of Columbia and to provide for the permanent 
     display of the statue in Emancipation Hall of the United 
     States Capitol.

                          ____________________
```
BARCLAYS OFFICIAL CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 13. MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION 3. AIR RESOURCES BOARD CHAPTER 5. STANDARDS FOR MOTOR

VEHICLE FUELS ARTICLE 1. STANDARDS FOR GASOLINE SUBARTICLE 2. STANDARDS FOR GASOLINE SOLD BEGINNING MARCH 1, 1996 This database is current through 12/26/08, Register

2008, No. 52 § 2263.7. Multiple Notification Requirements.Where a producer or importer is subject to multiple notification requirements pursuant to sections 2264(a)(2)(A), 2265.1 (applicable only to producers and importers that produce gasoline), 2265.5 (applicable only to producers and importers that produce gasoline), 2264.2(a)(2), 2264.2(b)(2), 2265(a)(2), 2266(c) or 2266.5(b), the producer or importer shall combine the notifications to the extent practicable.

<General Materials (GM) - References, Annotations, or

Tables> Note: Authority cited: Sections 39600 , 39601 , 43013 , 43013.1 , 43018 and 43101, Health and Safety Code ; and Western Oil and Gas Ass'n. v. Orange County Air Pollution Control District, 14 Cal.3d 411, 121 Cal. Rptr. 249 (1975) . Reference: Sections 39000 , 39001 , 39002 , 39003 , 39010 , 39500 , 39515 , 39516 , 41511 , 43000 , 43013 , 43013.1 , 43016 , 43018 and 43101, Health and Safety Code ; and Western Oil and Gas Ass'n. v. Orange County Air Pollution Control District, 14 Cal.3d 411, 121 Cal. Rptr. 249 (1975)

.

HISTORY

1. New section filed 2-28-96; operative 2-28-96 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4 (d) (Register 96, No. 9).

2. Amendment of Note filed 8-3-2000; operative 9-2-2000 (Register 2000, No. 31).

3. Amendment filed 8-29-2008; operative 8-29-2008 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4 (Register 2008, No. 35).
13 CCR § 2263.7, 13 CA ADC § 2263.7
13 CA ADC § 2263.7 END OF DOCUMENT 13 CA ADC § 2263.7 Page 1 13 CCR § 2263.7 Cal. Admin. Code tit. 13 , § 2263.7

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
```
      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
                                
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit
                                
                                



No. 97-2092

                          UNITED STATES,

                            Appellee,

                                v.

                      URIAS BARRETO RIVERA,

                      Defendant, Appellant.



           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                 FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

        [Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge]



                              Before

                      Torruella, Chief Judge,
                 Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge,
                   and Stahl, Circuit Judge.
                                
                                


     Edgardo Perez Gutierrez on brief for appellant.
     Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Jose A. Quiles-
Espinosa, Senior Litigation Counsel, and Camille Velez-Rive,
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.






MAY 27, 1998


                                
                                
  Per Curiam.  Upon careful consideration of the briefs and
record presented for this appeal, we conclude that the sentence
imposed upon revocation of supervised release was within the
district court's authority under 18 U.S.C. � 3583(e)(3) and was not
inconsistent with U.S.S.G. � 7B1.4.  See United States v. O'Neil,
11 F.3d 292, 301 n.11 (1st Cir. 1993).  In our view, the district
court adequately explained the reasons for the sentence.
  Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7110

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DALE LEWIS GIBSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District

Judge. (CR-98-249-4, CA-01-77-1)

Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 16, 2001

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dale Lewis Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, United

States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Dale Lewis Gibson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Gibson’s

motion to hold this appeal in abeyance pending the district court’s

action on his motion for a certificate of appealability, deny a

certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Gibson, Nos.

CR-98-249-4; CA-01-77-1 (W.D.N.C. May 15, 2001). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 10.39**

 

**AGREEMENT EXTENDING TERM OF**

**PHANTOM STOCK AGREEMENT**

 

THIS AGREEMENT EXTENDING TERM OF PHANTOM STOCK AGREEMENT(the “Extension Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the 31st day of December, 2009 by and between AffinityGroup, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“AGI”) and [                         ](the “Executive”);

 

# **WITNESSETH**

# ** **

WHEREAS, AGI and Executive are parties to that certainPhantom Stock Agreement dated as of January 1, 2007 (the “Agreement”); and

 

WHEREAS, AGI wishes to extend the term of the Agreement andExecutive is willing to have the term extended and to continue Executive’sduties with AGI on the terms set forth in this Extension Agreement;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of themutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration,AGI and Executive hereby agree as follows:

 

1.         The term ofthe Agreement shall be extended and shall continue until such time as AGI andthe Executive have entered into an amended agreement or a replacement agreementon terms that are mutually acceptable to AGI and the Executive.

 

2.         ThisExtension Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of whichshall be deemed to be an original without the production of the others, but allof which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

 

3.         ThisExtension Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties withrespect to the subject matter hereof and may not be varied, modified or amendedexcept by a writing signed by the parties to be charged.  The making, execution and delivery of thisExtension Agreement by the parties hereto have been induced by norepresentations, statements, warranties or agreements of the other except thoseherein expressed.

 

4.         Except asotherwise specifically modified or amended hereby, all of the terms of theAgreement shall remain in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the individual party has hereunto sethis hand and the corporate party has caused these presents to be executed by aproper officer thereunto duly authorized all as of the day and year first abovewritten.

 
|   | AFFINITY GROUP, INC. |
|--------|----------------------|
|   |                 |
|   | By:                  |   |   |
|   |                 | Its: |   |   |
|   |                 |
|   |                 |
|   |                 |   |
|   |                 |   [“Executive”] |
|        |                      |  |  |  |

 

121

----
Appendix A to Subpart F of Part 43O-Compliance Statement and Certification Report 

Compliance Statement 

Product: External power supply 

Manufacturer's or Private Labeler's Name and Address: 

Name: Ten Pao Electronics (Huizhou) Co., Ltd. 

Address: Dong Jiang Industrial Area, Shui Kou Town, Huizhou City, Guangdong Province. P.R.China 

This compliance statement and all certification reports submitted are in accordance with 10 CFR Part 430 

(Energy or Water Conservation Program for Consumer Products) and the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, 

as amended. The compliance statement is signed by a responsible official of the above named company. The 

basic model(s) listed in certification reports comply with the applicable energy conservation standard or water 

(in the case of faucets, showerheads, water closets, and urinals) conservation standard. All testing on which 

the certification reports are based was conducted in conformance with applicable test requirements prescribed 

in 10 CFR part 430 subpart B. All information reported in the certification report(s) is true, accurate, and 

complete. The company is aware of the penalties associated with violations of the Act, the regulations ' 

thereunder, and is also aware of the provisions contained in 18 U.S.C. 1001 , which prohibits knowingly making 

false statements to the Federal Government. 

Name of Company Official: __ "zh",a ... nuy"u",nz",h.!>a!!.n!ljg __ 

Signature:. ______________ _ 

Title: Manager 

z,y.z~ 

Firm or Organization: Ten Pao Electronics (Huizhou) Co., Ltd. 

Address: Dong Jiang Industrial Area, Shui Kou Town, Huizhou City, Guangdong Province, P.R.China 

Telephone Number: 0752-2312899 

Facsimile Number: 0752-2313888 

Date: 2010.04.13 

Certification Report 

Date: 2009.04.24 

Product Type: External power supply 

Product Class: CLASS A 

Manufacturer: Ten Pao Electronics (Huizhou) Co. Ltd. 

For Existing Model 

Provide specific product information including, for each basic model, the manufacturer's model numbers and 

the information required in §430.62(a)(4)(i) through (a)(4)(xvii». 

Item Average active No load mode power Nameplate Output Output 

Model No 

No mode efficiency ('!o) consumption (W) power (W) rating 

6Vdc 

1 SOO2CU0600030 63.06 0.12 1.8 

300mA
**Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 11 April 2008 – Cyprus v Commission**

**(Case T-119/08 R)**

Application for interim relief – Procurement notice for a contract to encourage economic development in the northern part of Cyprus – Application for suspension of operation of the notice – No urgency

Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Urgency – Arguments substantially the same as those submitted in an earlier case – Reference to the grounds for the previous decision – No urgency (Arts 242 EC and 243 EC; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 6-7)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for suspension of the operation of a procurement notice issued by the Commission for the encouragement of economic development in the northern part of Cyprus in the field of livestock rearing. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the application for interim relief; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Reserves the costs. |
Order entered September 11, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01079-CR

No. 05-12-01080-CR

KEITH BRONSHA PAUL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-41122-Y, F10-42448-Y

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

The appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
#### WEST KENTUCKY COAL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL BITUMINOUS COAL COMMISSION, and Its Successor, Harold L. Ickes, Secretary of the Department of the Interior of the United States, Respondents.

No. 8380.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 11, 1939.

Maurice K. Gordon, of Madisonville, Ky., and James G, Wheeler, of Paducah, Ky., for appellant.

Robert L. Stern, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., and Abe Fortas, Gen. Counsel, Bituminous Coal Division, Department of the Interior, and Harold; Leventhal, Bituminous Coal Division, Department of the Interior, both of Washington, D. C., for respondents.

Before HICKS and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on this the 11th day of October, 1939, and it appearing to the court that a stipulation between the West Kentucky Coal Company, petitioner, and Harold L. Ickes, Secretary of the Department of the Interior of the United States, and Howard A. Gray, Director of the Bituminous Coal Division of the Department of the Interior of the United States, as successors to the National Bituminous Coal Commission, respondents, has been entered into, and filed in this proceeding, by their attorneys of record, agreeing to the dismissal of the petition for review filed herein, it is therefore ordered, .adjudged, and decreed by the court that the petition for review herein be dismissed at petitioner’s cost for the reasons stated in the stipulation.
# C_2008236EN.01001202.xml

| 13.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/12

---

Action brought on 17 July 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland

(Case C-328/08)

(2008/C 236/20)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: U. Wölker and I. Koskinen, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Finland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/35/CE (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage and, in any event, by failing to communicate such measures to the Commission, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/35/CE (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage and, in any event, by failing to communicate such measures to the Commission, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for implementation of the directive expired on 30 April 2007.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 143, p. 56.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1621]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  DISAPPROVING RULE RELATING TO WAIVER AND EXPENDITURE AUTHORITY WITH 
     RESPECT TO THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES PROGRAM

                                 ______
                                 

                               speech of

                            HON. JOHN LEWIS

                               of georgia

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Mr. LEWIS of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I would like to be crystal clear 
in my opposition to this terrible bill.
  Instead of focusing on creating jobs or our nation's budget problems, 
this Congress is literally wasting time and resources. We are 
responding to an accusation that President Bush's advisor on welfare 
policy and a former Ways and Means Committee staffer said is just not 
true.
  In 2005, 29 Republican governors including Mitt Romney requested 
increased waiver authority. The bipartisan National Governor's 
Association repeatedly asked for this same flexibility.
  Let me be crystal clear--no one ever asked for or has been granted 
the ability to waive the TANF work requirement. There is a generation 
of Americans who watched their parents pull themselves up from poverty 
through education, work training, and child care support and become 
proud providers. They support the work requirements in TANF; in fact we 
all do. It works, and no one is trying to change that.
  Not only is rhetoric around this bill pants-on-fire-false, but it is 
also another attempt to attack practically every possible bipartisan, 
pragmatic solution offered by this administration.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge every American watching this debate to check the 
facts, and I urge every one of my colleagues to oppose this bill. Let's 
do the people's work and stop wasting time.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 504 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 504

To amend title 36, United States Code, to require that the POW/MIA flag 
    be displayed on all days that the flag of the United States is 
                 displayed on certain Federal property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2017

  Mr. Lance introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 36, United States Code, to require that the POW/MIA flag 
    be displayed on all days that the flag of the United States is 
                 displayed on certain Federal property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DAYS ON WHICH THE POW/MIA FLAG IS DISPLAYED ON CERTAIN 
              FEDERAL PROPERTY.

    Section 902 of title 36, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following 
        new subsection:
    ``(c) Days for Flag Display.--For the purposes of this section, 
POW/MIA flag display days are all days on which the flag of the United 
States is displayed.'';
            (2) in subsection (d)(1) by striking ``Capitol'' and 
        inserting ``U.S. Capitol'';
            (3) in subsection (d)(2) by striking ``White House'' and 
        inserting ``U.S. White House''; and
            (4) in subsection (e) by striking ``Capitol'' each place it 
        appears and inserting ``U.S. Capitol''.
                                 <all>
```