alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 1409

SHIRWA ALI GAAS , Petitioner ,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : November 19, 2021 Decided: January 4, 2022

Before MOTZ and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Marc Sequinót , SEGUINÓT & ASSOCIATES, PC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Petitioner. Brian Boynton, Assistant Attorney General, Sabatino F. Leo, Assistant Director, Margot L. Carter, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DE PARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Shirwa Ali Gaas, a native and citizen of Somalia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (B oard) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s (IJ) decision denying his application for a waiver of inadmissibility under Immigration and Nationality Act § 212(h), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h)(1). The Board affirmed the IJ’s finding that Gaas did not est ablish that his removal would cause an exceptional and extremely unusual hardship under 8 C.F.R. § 1212.7(d). The Board also affirmed the IJ’s alternate finding that Gaas was ineligible for a waiver of inadmissibility as a matter of
discretion. We dismis s the petition for review. Gaas asserts that 8 C.F.R. § 1212.7(d) does not apply to a waiver of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h)(1) (A) . We need not decide that question. Gaas does not challenge the Board’s alternate dispositive finding that his application for a waiver would
be denied as a matter of discretion and has abandoned that claim. See Suarez

- Valenzuela v. Holder , 714 F.3d 241, 248

- 49 (4th Cir. 2013) (failure to raise claim in opening brief triggers abandonment of that claim, citing Fed . R. App. P. 28(a)(9)); see also Boggala v.
Sessions , 866 F.3d 563 , 570 (4th Cir. 2018) (declining to review application of § 1212.7(d) because Boggala did not challenge the discretionary denial of relief). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5029 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5029

 To amend the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching 
Policy Act of 1977 to require the specialty crops committee to make an 
 additional recommendation regarding agricultural technology, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2018

   Mr. Soto introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching 
Policy Act of 1977 to require the specialty crops committee to make an 
 additional recommendation regarding agricultural technology, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATION OF SPECIALTY CROPS COMMITTEE 
              REGARDING USE OF AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY.

    (a) In General.--Section 1408A(c)(2) of the Food and Agriculture 
Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 3123a(c)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (G), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (H), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(I) increase the use of agricultural technology, 
                including sensor and imaging technology.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to reports submitted on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 8 (Thursday, January 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 1925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00401]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2020-N-0026]


Issuance of Priority Review Voucher; Rare Pediatric Disease 
Product

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
issuance of a priority review voucher to the sponsor of a rare 
pediatric disease product application. The Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) authorizes FDA to award priority review 
vouchers to sponsors of approved rare pediatric disease product 
applications that meet certain criteria. FDA is required to publish 
notice of the award of the priority review voucher. FDA has determined 
that ADZYNMA (ADAMTS13, recombinant-krhn), manufactured by Takeda 
Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., meets the criteria for a priority review 
voucher.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myrna Hanna, Center for Biologics 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-
402-7911.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is announcing the issuance of a priority 
review voucher to the sponsor of an approved rare pediatric disease 
product application. Under section 529 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 
360ff), FDA will award priority review vouchers to sponsors of approved 
rare pediatric disease product applications that meet certain criteria. 
FDA has determined that ADZYNMA (ADAMTS13, recombinant-krhn), 
manufactured by Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., meets the criteria 
for a priority review voucher.
    ADZYNMA (ADAMTS13, recombinant-krhn) is indicated for prophylactic 
or on-demand enzyme replacement therapy in adult and pediatric patients 
with congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.
    For further information about the Rare Pediatric Disease Priority 
Review Voucher Program and for a link to the full text of section 529 
of the FD&C Act, go to https://www.fda.gov/industry/developing-products-rare-diseases-conditions/rare-pediatric-disease-rpd-designation-and-voucher-programs. For further information about ADZYNMA 
(ADAMTS13, recombinant-krhn), go to the Center for Biologics Evaluation 
and Research's Approved Blood Products website at https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/adzynma.

    Dated: January 8, 2024.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-00401 Filed 1-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 41355 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v. YAIR PARROQUIN-LUNA,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:16 -CR- 122 -1

Before JOLLY, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Yair Parroquin

- Luna pled guilty without a written plea agreement to possession with intent to distribute 920.9 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A) . The district court sentenced
him to 80 months in prison and five years of supervised release. On appeal, he argues that the factual basis for his guilty plea was inadequate because the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fif h Circuit 

### FILED April 13, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-41355 Document: 00513951675 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/13/2017No. 16- 41355

2 G overnment did not prove that he knew the type and quantity of the drugs involved in the offense

. As Parroquin

- Luna concedes, his argument is foreclosed by United States
v. Betancourt , 586 F.3d 303, 308

– 09 (5th Cir. 2009) . It held that FloresFigueroa v. United States , 556 U.S. 646 (2009) , did not overturn United States v. G amez-Gonzalez , 319 F.3d 695 (5th Cir. 2003) , and that the Government is not required to prove knowledge of the drug type and quantity as an element of a Section 841 offense. See United States v. Gil-Cruz , 808 F.3d 274, 278 (5th Cir. 2015) (relying on Betancourt to reject as foreclosed a similar challenge to a drug conspiracy conviction). Accordingly, Parroquin -Luna ’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. Case: 16-41355 Document: 00513951675 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/13/2017
**Exhibit32.1**

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies,Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,2007, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Larry E. Buffington                                  |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Larry Buffington, President and Chief Executive  Officer |
| May 15, 2007                                             |

 

----
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4961 

To provide for the compensation of Federal employees furloughed during 

a Government shutdown. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2018 

Mr. BEYER (for himself, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. 

DESAULNIER, Mr. POCAN, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Ms. NORTON, 

Mrs. COMSTOCK, Mr. KILMER, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. PERLMUTTER, Ms. 

SHEA-PORTER, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. CICILLINE, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Ms. MENG, Mr. 

LOWENTHAL, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. BROWN of Maryland, Mr. 

HOYER, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. DELANEY, Mr. LYNCH, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. 

PAYNE, Mr. VEASEY, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. BEN RAY LUJA ́N

of New Mexico, Mr. COLE, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Ms. LEE, Mr. YARMUTH, Mr. WELCH, Mr. COOPER, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. LANGEVIN, 

Ms. MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico, Mrs. LOWEY, Mrs. 

BUSTOS, Ms. MOORE, Mr. SOTO, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. CLAY, Ms. 

ESHOO, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. MCEACHIN, Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE

of Pennsylvania, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. FOSTER, Mr. O’HALLERAN, Mrs. 

WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. COHEN, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. 

ADAMS, Mr. VISCLOSKY, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. DANNY

K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Ms. HANABUSA, Ms. STEFANIK, 

Mr. VELA, Mr. MICHAEL F. DOYLE of Pennsylvania, Ms. PLASKETT, Mr. 

GRIFFITH, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. LAWSON of Florida, Mr. MCNERNEY, Ms. ESTY of Connecticut, Mr. EVANS, Mr. PALLONE, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. COSTA, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Mr. 

PANETTA, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. SIRES, Mr. JONES, Mr. 

CORREA, Mr. CRIST, Ms. BORDALLO, Mrs. DEMINGS, and Ms. SLAUGHTER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4961 IH

A BILL 

To provide for the compensation of Federal employees 

furloughed during a Government shutdown. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Ret5 roactive Pay Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES FUR7 LOUGHED DURING A GOVERNMENT SHUT8 DOWN. 

9 Federal employees furloughed as a result of any lapse 

10 in appropriations that begins on or about February 8, 

11 2018, shall be compensated at their standard rate of com12 pensation, for the period of such lapse in appropriations, 

13 as soon as practicable after such lapse in appropriations 

14 ends. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
##### Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT  Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) December 10, 2008
 GRUBB & ELLIS COMPANY
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    1-8122
    
    94-1424307(State or other 
jurisdiction of 
formation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 1551 North Tustin Avenue, Suite 300, Santa Ana, California 92705
 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code (714) 667-8252
 Not Applicable
 (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 8.01 Other Events.Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.SIGNATURESEXHIBIT 99.1Exhibit 99.2    Table of Contents  
 Item 8.01 Other Events.
  
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (d)
    
    The following is filed as an Exhibit to this Current Report on Form 8-K:
 99.1
    
    Press Release issued by Grubb & Ellis Company on December 10, 2008.99.2
    
    Press Release issued by Grubb & Ellis Company on December 10, 2008.




---



##### Table of Contents



GRUBB & ELLIS COMPANYBy:
    /s/ Richard W. PehlkeRichard W. PehlkeChief Financial Officer and
Executive Vice President
Opinion filed November 13, 2008 

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________

No. 11-07-00350-CR

__________

 PHILLIP MICHAEL JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

 STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 35th District Court

 Brown County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR18825

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The jury convicted Phillip Michael Johnson of aggravated robbery and assessed his

punishment at confinement for twenty-seven years. We affirm.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The motion is supported

by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the record and applicable

law and states that he has concluded that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel has provided appellant

with a copy of the brief and advised appellant of his right to review the record and file a response

to counsel’s brief. A response has not been filed. Court-appointed counsel has complied with the
2

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2008); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); High v. State, 573

S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); and Eaden v. State, 161 S.W.3d 173

(Tex. App.—Eastland 2005, no pet.).

Following the procedures outlined in Anders, we have independently reviewed the record,

and we agree that the appeal is without merit. We note that counsel has the responsibility to advise

appellant that he may file a petition for discretionary review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Likewise, this court advises appellant

that he may file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 66. Black v. State,

217 S.W.3d 687 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2007, no pet.). 

The motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

November 13, 2008

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1470/2006

of 4 October 2006         

providing for the rejection of applications for export licences in relation to certain processed products and cereal-based compound feedingstuffs

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1342/2003 of 28 July 2003 laying down special detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences for cereals and rice (2), and in particular Article 8(1) thereof,

Whereas:

The quantity covered by applications for advance fixing of refunds on potato starch and maize-based products is of great importance and could give rise to speculation. It has therefore been decided to reject all applications for export licences of such products made on 2, 3 and 4 October 2006,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In accordance with Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1342/2003, applications for export licences with advance fixing of refunds for products falling within CN codes 1102 20 10, 1102 20 90, 1103 13 10, 1103 13 90, 1104 23 10, 1108 12 00, 1108 13 00, 1702 30 51, 1702 30 91, 1702 30 99, 1702 40 90 and 1702 90 50 made on 2, 3 and 4 October 2006 shall be rejected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 5 October 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 October 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 189, 29.7.2003, p. 12. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1263/2006 (OJ L 230, 24.8.2006, p. 6).

----
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5022 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5022

  To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to authorize funding for the 
         voluntary public access and habitat incentive program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2018

 Mr. Marshall (for himself, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, Mrs. Bustos, 
and Mrs. Dingell) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                      the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to authorize funding for the 
         voluntary public access and habitat incentive program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Voluntary Public Access Improvement 
Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. VOLUNTARY PUBLIC ACCESS AND HABITAT INCENTIVE PROGRAM.

    Section 1240R(f)(1) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 
3839bb-5(f)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``practicable, $50,000,000'' and inserting 
        the following: ``practicable--
                    ``(A) $50,000,000'';
            (2) in subparagraph (A) (as so designated), by striking 
        ``2012 and $40,000,000'' and inserting the following: ``2012;
                    ``(B) $40,000,000''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (B) (as so designated), by striking the 
        period at the end and inserting the following: ``; and
                    ``(C) $150,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 
                2019 through 2023.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2011030EN.01005803.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/58

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 23 November 2010 — Bartha v Commission

(Case F-50/08) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Open competition - Failure to include the applicant on the reserve list - Balanced representation of women and men on competition selection boards)

2011/C 30/109

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gábor Bartha (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Homoki, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission (represented by: J. Currall, V. Bottka and A. Sipos, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of EPSO’s decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list for competition EPSO/AD/56/06.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision 23 January 2008, by which the selection board of competition EPSO/AD/56/06 dismissed Mr Bartha’s application for reconsideration of the decision of that selection board rejecting the applicant's candidature; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision 23 January 2008, by which the selection board of competition EPSO/AD/56/06 dismissed Mr Bartha’s application for reconsideration of the decision of that selection board rejecting the applicant's candidature;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear all of the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear all of the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 15.8.2008, p. 73.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6534]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            NATIONAL DAY FOR THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA ON TAIWAN

  Mr. MENENDEZ. Mr. President, I rise today to honor the people and 
leaders of Taiwan on their National Day on October 10. This is a day 
for celebration, a special day that recognizes the founding of the 
country 101 years ago.
  I would like to highlight the economic success of Taiwan over the 
last century--a success that has rightly been called a ``miracle'' and 
resulted in a strong and dynamic economy. The United States and Taiwan 
have a long history of mutual trade and friendship that has promoted 
economic prosperity on both sides of the Pacific. I am particularly 
pleased that the U.S.-Taiwan bilateral relationship has become even 
stronger in recent years.
  I also would like to take this opportunity to congratulate Ambassador 
Jason Yuan, Representative of the ROC (Taiwan) to the United States, on 
his new post as Secretary-General of the National Security Council of 
Taiwan. I cherish the friendship with Ambassador Yuan and wish 
Ambassador and Madame Yuan the very best of luck in the future.
  I urge my colleagues to join me in congratulating the people of 
Taiwan on their success and thanking them for their continued efforts 
to work with the United States to foster a strong economic growth and 
cooperation. On this day of National Celebration, the people of both 
the United States and Taiwan have much to celebrate.

                          ____________________
```