alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5070 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5070

To restore certain exceptions to the United States Grain Standards Act, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 20, 2018

 Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois (for himself and Mrs. Bustos) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To restore certain exceptions to the United States Grain Standards Act, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Grain Inspection Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTORING CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO UNITED STATES GRAIN STANDARDS 
              ACT.

    (a) In General.--Grain handling facilities described in subsection 
(b) may, before September 30, 2020, restore a prior agreement with an 
official agency designated under the rule entitled ``Exceptions to 
Geographic Areas for Official Agencies Under the USGSA'' published by 
the Department of Agriculture in the Federal Register on April 18, 2003 
(68 Fed. Reg. 19139), if--
            (1) such grain handling facility and official agency agree 
        to restore such prior agreement; and
            (2) such grain handling facility notifies the Secretary of 
        Agriculture of--
                    (A) the agreement described in paragraph (1); and
                    (B) the effective date of such agreement.
    (b) Eligible Grain Handling Facilities.--Subsection (a) shall apply 
with respect to grain handling facilities that were--
            (1) granted exceptions pursuant to the rule specified in 
        subsection (a); and
            (2) had such exceptions revoked on or after April 14, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1527]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

       RECOGNIZING THE DISTINGUISHED CAREER OF BARBARA TACHOVSKY

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. JIM GERLACH

                            of pennsylvania

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 14, 2012

  Mr. GERLACH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to congratulate Barbara 
Tachovsky on her retirement as President of Paoli Hospital after 26 
years of service to the Hospital and in the field of healthcare.
   Under President Tachovsky's leadership, Paoli Hospital earned 
accreditation as the only Level II Trauma Center in Chester County, 
which alleviated the need for victims of traumatic injury to be 
transported further away for emergency treatment and saved countless 
lives. Additionally, Paoli Hospital was recognized four times as a Top 
100 Hospital by Thomson Reuters and as a Best Regional Hospital in five 
specialties by US News and World Report. During her tenure, Paoli also 
received the Premier Award for Quality two years in a row, as well as 
numerous certifications for providing outstanding care and achieving 
operational efficiency.
   Mr. Speaker, in light of her years of exemplary service to her 
community and a litany of sterling accomplishments too long to record, 
I ask that my colleagues join me today in recognizing Barbara Tachovsky 
for her invaluable contributions to the quality of life of the citizens 
of Chester County, Pennsylvania and the surrounding region.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 10.24
 ARRIS GROUP, INC.
2008 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 Restricted Stock Grant
 
 
 Grant of Restricted Stock
 Restrictions
 No Shareholder Rights
 Vesting Exhibit A Exhibit A




---



##### 



Securities Law Restrictions
   Stock Power
 2




---



##### 



Additional Restrictions
 Custody of Certificates
 Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement
     3




---



##### 



Agreement to Terms of the Plan and Agreement
 Fractional Shares
 Change in Capital Structure
 Notice
 If to the Company:
    
    ARRIS Group, Inc.3871 Lakefield DriveSuwanee, Georgia 30024Attn: SecretaryIf to the Participant:
    
    The address of the Participant as it
appears in the employment records of the Company
 No Right to Continued Employment
 Impact on Other Plans and Arrangements
 4




---



##### 



Binding Effect
 Conflicts
 Governing Law
 Tax Consequences and Section 409A
 Withholding Obligations
 Amendment or Termination
 Definitions
 Affiliate ,
 Cause
 5




---



##### 



Change in Control
 Code
 Competing Business
 Disabled
  COMPANY:ARRIS GROUP, INC.By:
 6




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A  Vesting Provisions
 Exhibit A both
 I. General Vesting
 Service-Based Vesting
 o
 Percentage of Shares That Vest
    
    Vesting Date__%
    
    , 20____%
    
    , 20____%
    
    , 20____%
    
    , 20__
 Performance-Based Vesting
 o
  II. Accelerated Vesting
 Accelerated Vesting on Death
 o
 Accelerated Vesting on Disability
 o




---



##### 



Accelerated Vesting on Change in Control
 o
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 1064

DORA L. ADKINS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICE COMPANY, INC. , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Michael Stefan Nachmanoff , District Judge. ( 1:22

- cv - 01009

- MSN

- IDD )

Submitted : April 20, 2023 Decided: April 25, 2023

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Dora L. Adkins , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1064 Doc: 20 Filed: 04/25/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM : Dora L. Adkins appea ls the district court’s order denying her motion for leave to file a complaint and application to proceed on that complaint in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Adkins’ motions
for leave to am end her informal opening brief and affirm the district court’s order.
Adkins v. Am. Express Travel Related Serv. Co., LLC , No. 1:22

- cv - 01009

- MSN

- IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 17, 2022). We deny Adkins’ motions to vacate and remand, for leave to replace, to amend he r motion to vacate and remand, for leave to amend the motion to vacate and remand, for leave to amend the motion to vacate and remand and to moot all other motions, for leave to withdraw , and to expedite the motion for leave to vacate and remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1064 Doc: 20 Filed: 04/25/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDDIE PAREDES-PEREZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-71408

Agency No. A071-813-458

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 9, 2016

San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge and SCHROEDER and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Eddie Paredes-Perez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions

for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying

Paredes-Perez’s motion to reopen his 1992 removal proceedings. The BIA denied

the motion as untimely. The motion was filed years after the expiration of the 90-

day filing period, and petitioner does not contend that any of the exceptions to that

FILED

FEB 22 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
limitation apply. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i); 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2(c)(2)–(3),

1003.23(b)(4). 

Paredes-Perez contends that the underlying criminal conviction on which the

deportation was based is now unsound because the conviction has been expunged

under California’s state rehabilitative procedures, and also, because a 2007

decision of this court invalidated the conviction. See Paredes-Perez v. Keisler, 252

F. App’x 132 (9th Cir. 2007). Neither contention has merit. 

Petitioner has never shown that the expungement vitiated the immigration

consequences of the conviction within the meaning of Lujan-Armendariz v. INS,

222 F.3d 728, 749–50 (9th Cir. 2000), overruled in part by Nunez-Reyes v. Holder,

646 F.3d 684 (9th Cir. 2011). This court’s 2007 decision held only that in a

subsequent removal proceeding, the agency had not relied on appropriate

documentation to establish the conviction. It did not vitiate the conviction itself. 

Petitioner has not provided any plausible justification either for reopening, or for

his delay. 

The BIA correctly ruled that the motion to reopen was untimely. 

Petition for review is DENIED.

2
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6151]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. COURTNEY:
       H.R. 6440.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, section 8, Clause 1 and Article IV, section 3, 
     Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States grants 
     Congress the authority to enact this bill.
```
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

MSHC The Waterton at Cowhorn Creek, 

LLC, Appellant

No. 06-12-00056-CV v.

Donna Miller, Individually and as 

Representative of the Estate of Nellie Mae 

Jackson, Appellee

Appeal from the 5th District Court of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

11C0131-005). Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice 

Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in part of the order 

of the court below. Therefore, we reverse the order of the trial court only to the extent it denied 

dismissal of Miller’s direct liability claims against The Waterton, and we render judgment 

dismissing those claims. In accordance with our opinion and except to the specific extent we 

reverse the order of the trial court, we sustain the trial court’s rulings relative to The Waterton’s 

motion to dismiss.

We further order that the costs of this appeal be equally split between Appellant and 

Appellee.

RENDERED DECEMBER 14, 2012

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 17

- 00055

- CV

IN RE MEDFINMANAGER, LLC and Joel Clapick

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 8, 2017

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On February 2, 2017

, R elator s filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has

considered R elators ’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that R elator s are not

entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

.

R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015CI16271, pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar C ounty,

Texas, the Honorable Laura Salinas presiding.
(4910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATiON NCURRENCilS

ROIJrING SYMIO:)L

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products lis

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl)

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Department of Transportation

It has been determined that due to an intermittent communication between

AMS [Air Management System] controlJer cards and both Secondary

Power Distribution Assemblies (SPDAs) the message "RECIRC''''SMK

DEI FAIL" is displayed in the Engine Indication and Crew/Alerting

System (EICAS), This communication failure could result in loss of

automatic activation of engine inlet ice protection system when in ice

condition. In this situation the caution messages "A-I Eng 1 Fail" and "AI Eng 2 Fail" will be displayed and if the flight crews do not follow the

associated procedures ice may accrete in the engines inlet and cause a dual

engine shut down.

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe TE

S~I()-rtl

(DOT).

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Mo

RlN 212O-AA64

O~71f

[Docket No. FAA-2010-*****; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-055-AD;

1";);.4-'0 01-D4

Amendment 39-*****; AD 2010-**-**]

ERJ 170 and Model ERJ 190 Airplanes

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

. condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

• • • • • • •
EXHIBIT
31.4
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, Ray
Sienko, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Century Casinos,
Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date: May
27, 2005
 
 /s/ Ray
Sienko
 ________________________________
 Ray
Sienko
 Chief
Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4989 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4989

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To require the Department of State to establish a policy regarding the 
 use of location-tracking consumer devices by employees at diplomatic 
            and consular facilities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Diplomats from 
Surveillance Through Consumer Devices Act''.

SEC. 2. SECURE UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR FACILITIES AGAINST 
              CYBERSURVEILLANCE.

    (a) Policy on Location-Tracking Consumer Devices.--Not later than 
60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
State shall establish a policy on the use of location-tracking consumer 
devices, including GPS-enabled devices, at United States diplomatic and 
consular facilities by United States Government employees, contractors, 
locally employed staff and members of other agencies deployed to or 
stationed at such facilities.
    (b) Security Briefing.--Existing and new employees at United States 
diplomatic and consular facilities, including contractors, locally 
employed staff, and members of other agencies deployed to or stationed 
at such facilities, shall, as a part of the security briefings provided 
to such employees, be informed of the policy described in subsection 
(a) and given instructions on the use of location-tracking consumer 
devices both on and off the premises of such facilities.
    (c) Coordination.--The Secretary of State may coordinate with the 
heads of any other agencies whose employees are deployed to or 
stationed at United States diplomatic and consular facilities in the 
formulation of the policy described in subsection (a) and the 
dissemination of such policy pursuant to subsection (b).
    (d) Report.--Not later than 30 days after the formulation of the 
policy described in subsection (a), the Secretary of State shall submit 
to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on the 
details of such policy.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4989

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To require the Department of State to establish a policy regarding the 
 use of location-tracking consumer devices by employees at diplomatic 
            and consular facilities, and for other purposes.
```
**Exhibit 15.1****Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**To the Board of Directors and
II 

Calendar No. 399 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4910 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2018 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide outer 

burial receptacles for remains buried in National Parks, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Cemetery 

5 Benefit Correction Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROVISION OF OUTER BURIAL RECEPTACLES FOR 

7 REMAINS BURIED IN NATIONAL PARKS. 

8 Section 2306(e) of title 38, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (1)— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4910 PCS 

1 (A) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ before ‘‘The Sec2 retary of Veterans’’; 

3 (B) in subparagraph (A), as designated by 

4 subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, by striking 

5 ‘‘The Secretary of the Army’’ and inserting the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(B) The Secretary of the Army’’; and 

8 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

9 subparagraph: 

10 ‘‘(C) The Secretary of the Interior shall provide an 

11 outer burial receptacle for each such a grave in an open 

12 national cemetery administered by the National Park 

13 Service.’’; 

14 (2) in paragraph (2)— 

15 (A) by striking ‘‘or in the Arlington Na16 tional Cemetery’’ and inserting ‘‘, in the Arling17 ton National Cemetery, or in a national ceme18 tery administered by the National Park Serv19 ice’’; and 

20 (B) by striking ‘‘or Secretary of the Army’’ 

21 and inserting ‘‘, the Secretary of the Army, or 

22 the Secretary of the Interior’’; 

23 (3) in paragraph (3)(B)(ii), by striking ‘‘or, 

24 with respect to Arlington National Cemetery, the 

25 Secretary of the Army’’ and inserting ‘‘or the SecVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:41 May 08, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4910.PCS H4910

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4910 PCS 

1 retary of the Army with respect to Arlington Na2 tional Cemetery or the Secretary of the Interior with 

3 respect to a national cemetery administered by the 

4 National Park Service’’; and 

5 (4) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘or, with re6 spect to Arlington National Cemetery, the Secretary 

7 of the Army’’ and inserting ‘‘or the Secretary of the 

8 Army with respect to Arlington National Cemetery 

9 or the Secretary of the Interior with respect to a na10 tional cemetery administered by the National Park 

11 Service’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 399 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4910 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide 

National Parks, and for other purposes. outer burial receptacles for remains buried in 

MAY 8, 2018 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS