alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT JUNE 30, 1998 FOR THE
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000909125
<NAME>              MOLINE REAL ESTATE
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,866
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                       168
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,689
<PP&E>                                          25,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,966
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            65
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,421
<SALES>                                         31,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,153
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,924
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,456
<INCOME-TAX>                                       265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,191
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Otto SAINSBURY v. BUSINESS MEN’S ASSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA.

No. 1987.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Oct. 24, 1939.

Badger, Rich & Rich, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for cross-appellant.

Bagley, Judd, Ray & Nebeker, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for cross-appellee.

Before LEWIS, PHILLIPS, and BRATTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Cross-appeal dismissed' on application of cross-appellant, pursuant to stipulation.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6228]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      SENATE ENROLLED BILLS SIGNED

  The Speaker announced his signature to enrolled bills of the Senate 
of the following titles.

       S. 3245. An act to extend by 3 years the authorization of 
     the EB-5 Regional Center Program, the E-Verify Program, the 
     Special Immigrant Nonminister Religious Worker Program, and 
     the Conrad State 30 J-1 Visa Waiver Program.
       S. 3552. An act to reauthorize the Federal Insecticide, 
     Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.

                          ____________________
```
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4875 

To provide for the compensation of Federal contractor employees that may 

be placed on unpaid leave as a result of the Federal Government shutdown, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2018 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide for the compensation of Federal contractor employees that may be placed on unpaid leave as a result 

of the Federal Government shutdown, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Low-Wage Federal 

5 Contractor Employee Back Pay Act of 2018’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4875 IH

1 SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FURLOUGHED FEDERAL CON2 TRACTOR EMPLOYEES. 

3 Title VII of Division E of the Consolidated Appro4 priations Act, 2017 (Public Law 115–31) is amended by 

5 adding at the end the following new section: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 750. If a Federal contractor that provides re7 tail, food, custodial, or security services to the Federal 

8 Government places the employees of such contractor on 

9 unpaid leave as a result of any lapse in appropriations 

10 which begins in fiscal year 2018, the Government shall 

11 provide compensation to such employees at their standard 

12 rate of compensation for the period of such lapse.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.4


              DESCRIPTION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN


         The compensation payable to MediaBay's "Independent Auditors" under the
Nasdaq Marketplace Rules (or the rules of the principal exchange on which
MediaBay's common stock is listed, if the common stock is not listed on Nasdaq)
is as follows:

         1. $2,000 per month for serving as a member of the Board of  Directors,
payable on the first calendar day of each month, commencing May 1, 2005.

         2. $1,000 per month for serving as Audit Committee Chairman, payable on
the first calendar of each month, commencing May 1, 2005.

         3.  $2,500  per month for  serving  as Lead  Independent  Director  (as
designated by the Board of Directors), payable on the first calendar day of each
month,  commencing May 1, 2005.  Richard Berman has been designated by the Board
of Directors as Lead Independent Director.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
26, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1998
<CASH>                                              65
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,393
<INVENTORY>                                    103,716
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               210,311
<PP&E>                                          79,144
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 292,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,175
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   292,750
<SALES>                                        910,272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               910,272
<CGS>                                          693,956
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  693,956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               191,201
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,915
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    568
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,019
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (451)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (451)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 131486 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 131486 COA: 266477 Ottawa CC: 03-027409-FH CARLOS ENRIQUE PEREZ-BECERRA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 7, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing en titlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5002 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5002

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2018

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To expand the unique research initiatives authority of the National 
                         Institutes of Health.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Advancing Cutting Edge Research 
Act'' or the ``ACE Research Act''.

SEC. 2. UNIQUE RESEARCH INITIATIVES.

    Section 402(n)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
282(n)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or'';
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) high impact cutting-edge research that 
                fosters scientific creativity and increases fundamental 
                biological understanding leading to the prevention, 
                diagnosis, or treatment of diseases and disorders, or 
                research urgently required to respond to a public 
                health threat.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>
                                                              Exhibit 10.14

                               AMENDMENT AGREEMENT

        AMENDMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of January 1, 1997, by and between
ENAMELON, INC., a Delaware corporation, having Its principal place of business
at 15 Kimball Avenue, Yonkers New York 10704 (the "Company"), and D. BROOKS
COLE, residing at 36 Cherry Tree Lane, Orchard Park, New York 14127 (the
"Employee").

        The Company and the Employee are parties to an Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement, dated June 1, 1995 (the "Employment Agreement") and have
agreed to amend the Employment Agreement as herein provided. Capitalized terms
used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Employment Agreement unless
otherwise defined herein.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
herein set forth, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as
follows:

         I . Section 4(f) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its
entirely and the following new Section 4(f) is hereby inserted in lieu thereof

                       (f)     Until the earlier of (i) the termination of this
                  Agreement, (ii) the Employee's relocation to a permanent
                  residence

                  that is located within 100 miles of the Company's principal
                  office facility (presently located at 758 Route 18, East
                  Brunswick, New Jersey), or (iii) June 1, 1997, the Company
                  shall reimburse the Employee for rent on any temporary
                  residence maintained by the Employee within 100 miles of the
                  Company's principal office facility. In addition, the Company
                  shall pay the Employee $10,000 to cover relocation expenses
                  upon his permanent relocation within 100 miles of the
                  Company's principal office facility.

        2. The terms "this Agreement," "hereof," "hereunder" and words of like
meaning appearing in the Employment Agreement shall mean and refer to the
Employment Agreement as amended hereby.

        3. Except as otherwise amended by this Amendment Agreement, the
Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and the Company and
the Employee each hereby reaffirm each of their respective agreements, covenants
and obligations set forth therein.


              IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the panics hereto have executed this Amendment
Agreement as of the date above written.

                                                 ENAMELON, INC.

                                                 By: /s/ Steven R. Fox
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Steven R. Fox, Chairman

                                                     /s/ D. Brooks Cole
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     D. Brooks Cole
#### Grace B. CLARK, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 11196.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

March 15, 1939.

Roy W. Rucker and James Daleo, both of Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

Maurice M. Milligan, U. S. Atty., and Randall Wilson, Sam C. Blair, Thomas A. Costolow, and Richard K. Phelps, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Kansas City, Mo.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and sentence vacated, etc., and cause remanded with full power and authority in District Court to permit appellant to change his pleas, etc., on motion of appellant and consent of counsel for appellee.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1568]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               HONORING COLBY COLLEGE ON ITS BICENTENNIAL

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. MICHAEL H. MICHAUD

                                of maine

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 19, 2012

  Mr. MICHAUD. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to congratulate Colby College 
as it prepares to celebrate its bicentennial in 2013.
  Nearly 200 years ago, residents of Kennebec County raised over $4,000 
to secure land for a locally-based theological institution. The 
petition establishing what was then the Maine Literary and Theological 
Institution was formally adopted by the Massachusetts Legislature on 
February 27, 1813, making it the 33rd chartered college in the country. 
Today, Colby College enrolls over 1,800 students from 46 states and 76 
countries. As one of the finest liberal arts colleges in the country, 
its graduates have gone on to become international business leaders, 
critically acclaimed writers, noted statesmen, and even members of my 
Congressional staff.
  Throughout its history, Colby College has fostered a culture of 
social justice at its very core. In 1833, students launched the first 
college-based anti-slavery society. In 1871, Colby College became the 
first all-male college in New England to admit women, the first of whom 
was Mary Caffrey Low, valedictorian of the Class of 1875 and one of the 
five founding members of the Sigma Kappa sorority. In 1985, students 
successfully protested for College divestment in South Africa in 
protest of apartheid. More recently, Colby has made ever increasing 
strides to attract students with diverse cultural and economic 
backgrounds, to reduce the college's carbon footprint, and to develop 
new partnerships with the community.
  The College will kick off its bicentennial celebration this October. 
Special lectures, panel discussions, and festivities will be held 
throughout the year both on campus, as well as in downtown Waterville. 
I am pleased to have the opportunity to join the community's 
celebration of Colby, and I look forward to watching the College 
continue its growth during the years to come.
  Mr. Speaker, please join me again in congratulating the students, 
alumni, faculty, staff, and friends of Colby College as they celebrate 
their bicentennial.

                          ____________________
```
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4934 

To prohibit assistance to the Government of Pakistan, and to require the 

Department of State and the United States Agency for International 

Development to transfer amounts to the Highway Trust Fund equivalent 

to historic levels of assistance to Pakistan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2018 

Mr. SANFORD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit assistance to the Government of Pakistan, and 

to require the Department of State and the United 

States Agency for International Development to transfer 

amounts to the Highway Trust Fund equivalent to historic levels of assistance to Pakistan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON ASSISTANCE TO PAKISTAN. 

4 No amounts appropriated or otherwise made avail5 able to the Department of State or the United States 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4934 IH

1 Agency for International Development may be made avail2 able as assistance to the Government of Pakistan. 

3 SEC. 2. REQUIRED TRANSFERS TO THE HIGHWAY TRUST 

4 FUND. 

5 (a) DEPARTMENT OF STATE.—Upon receipt of ap6 propriations for the balance of fiscal year 2018, the Sec7 retary of State shall transfer $1,280,000,000 to the High8 way Trust Fund. 

9 (b) UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL

10 DEVELOPMENT.—Upon receipt of appropriations for the 

11 balance of fiscal year 2018, the Administrator of the 

12 United States Agency for International Development shall 

13 transfer $852,000,000 to the Highway Trust Fund. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
10.1


 


SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF 2004 MICP


 


On April 5, 2005, the Board
of Directors of Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc. (the “Company”),
approved the 2004 Management Incentive Compensation Plan (“MICP”) payments, and
the 2005 base salary for each executive officer of the Company who is expected
to be a named executive officer in the Company’s proxy statement for the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 7, 2005 (excluding the President and
Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Max Lukens, the expected named executive officers
are referred to herein as the “Expected Named Executives”).  For Fiscal 2004, the target incentive for
annual incentive compensation for the Expected Named Executives was fifty
percent (50%) of their respective base salary, with an over-achievement
opportunity up to a maximum of one hundred percent (100%) of their respective
base salary.  In approving the MICP
payments, the Board of Directors considered a financial measurement, the
Company’s return on net capital employed, along with several subjective factors.  The 2004 MICP payments and the 2005 base
salaries for the Expected Named Executive Officers are set forth below.


 


	
  Expected Named Executive
  Officer

  	
   

  	
  2004 MICP Payment

  Approved

  	
   

  	
  2005 Base Salary

  	
   

  
	
  Max Lukens

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  0

  	
  *

  	
  $

  	
  750,000

  	
  *

  
	
  Carl B. King

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  305,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  325,000

  	
   

  
	
  Dennis M. Dellinger

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  270,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  290,000

  	
   

  
	
  John B. Simmons

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  260,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  300,000

  	
   

  
	
  Don K. Kyle

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  240,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  270,000

  	
   

  



 










*
The base salary and the bonus for Max Lukens, President and Chief Executive
Officer, are described in his employment agreement filed with the Commission as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended May 1, 2004.


 


1
# C_2008313EN.01005903.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/59

---

Action brought on 10 October 2008 — Gheysens v Council

(Case F-83/08)

(2008/C 313/109)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Johan Gheysens (Mechelen, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Council fixing the conditions of the applicant's recruitment in so far as it limits the duration of the contract to two years and classifies him in function group III, grade 11, step 1 and a declaration that Article 88 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants is illegal in so far as it authorises successive contracts for a fixed period subject to an overall limit of three years.

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that Article 88 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants is illegal in so far as it authorises successive contracts for a fixed period subject to an overall limit of three years; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that Article 88 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants is illegal in so far as it authorises successive contracts for a fixed period subject to an overall limit of three years;

| — | Annul the decision of the Council fixing the conditions of the applicant's recruitment in so far as it limits the duration of his contract to two years and classifies him in function group III, grade 11, step 1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Council fixing the conditions of the applicant's recruitment in so far as it limits the duration of his contract to two years and classifies him in function group III, grade 11, step 1;

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---