alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6074]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            FOUR STRAIGHT YEARS OF TRILLION DOLLARS DEFICITS

  (Ms. FOXX asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, the President has burdened the Nation with 4 
straight years of trillion dollar deficits and has added more than $5 
trillion to our national defense. His failed policies have done nothing 
but make our economy worse. Now he wants to turn our debt crisis into a 
defense crisis. The President's own Secretary of Defense has said the 
looming half-trillion dollars in defense cuts would ``hollow out the 
force and inflict severe damage to our national defense.''
  So far the President has refused to offer any alternatives whatever. 
House Republicans remain committed to slashing spending and reducing 
the deficit but not by arbitrarily cutting funding that supports our 
troops and their families. That's why we passed specific, commonsense 
reforms to replace these dangerous cuts.
  It's time for the President to help us rescue our Nation's defenders 
from these imminent cuts before they take effect and our national 
security is further compromised.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1648]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

    IN RECOGNITION OF THE DEDICATED SERVICE OF CHARLES W. CARPENTER

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. MICHAEL C. BURGESS

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. BURGESS. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor Charles W. Carpenter, 
the president of the Denton Chamber of Commerce for the past 30 years.
  Mr. Carpenter graduated from Baylor University in 1975, with a 
Bachelor's of Arts in communications. His personal and professional 
background in communications and his exceptional administrative skills 
have benefited him as he continues in his dedicated service in leading 
the Chamber and its staff.
  He has been recognized for his contributions and continuous 
leadership to the city of Denton through numerous awards. He was the 
2011 recipient of the Boy Scouts Distinguished Citizens Award and was 
commemorated in front of 20 past chairs of the chamber board for his 
positive influence through the chamber to the Denton community. In June 
2010, he received the Marvin Hurley Lifetime Achievement Award by the 
Texas Chamber of Commerce Executives Association.
  Continually, Mr. Carpenter demonstrates his true passion to influence 
constructive change in the community of Denton. He is a founding member 
and supporter of the Denton Chamber 101 Club, which funds the Shop 
Denton Chamber First program. He is also an alumni member of Leadership 
Denton, as well as an appointed member of the board of directors of the 
Denton Economic Development Partnership.
  Mr. Carpenter and the other members of the Denton Chamber of Commerce 
have made it a priority to connect local businesses with one another in 
order to help the business community of Denton flourish. Also, it is 
the only chamber in the DFW Metroplex and surrounding area that houses 
a full-service Small Business Development Center. Under his direction, 
the Denton Chamber remains a consistent and trustworthy organization 
for local business. For over 35 years, it has continued to be one of 
only 250 chambers in the nation to have accomplished and sustained 
accreditation through the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
  It is my pleasure to recognize the president of Denton Chamber of 
Commerce, Charles Carpenter, and his 30 years of service to the 
community. I am privileged to represent the City of Denton in the U.S. 
House of Representatives.

                          ____________________
```
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of

the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders

and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions

of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 9/26/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

United States of America,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Luwayne Coy Tindall,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 96-8004

(D. Ct. No. 95CR 52J)

(D. Wyo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before, TACHA, BALDOCK and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This appeal is from an order of the district court sentencing appellant to

ninety-seven months imprisonment after appellant’s plea of guilty to one count of

Aggravated Sexual Abuse of a Child in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 1153. 
- 2 -

On appeal appellant objects to the length of the sentence imposed. Appellant’s

counsel has filed a brief and requested leave to withdraw as counsel pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

A defendant’s right to appeal a sentence imposed by a federal court is

governed by 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). Under that section, a sentence within the

Sentencing Guidelines may not be appealed unless imposed in violation of law or

as a result of an incorrect application of the Guidelines. 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(1)-

(2); United States v. Havens, 910 F.2d 703, 706-07 (10th Cir. 1990), cert. denied,

498 U.S. 1030 (1991); United States v. Richardson, 901 F.2d 867, 870 (10th Cir.

1990); United States v. Davis, 900 F.2d 1524, 1530 (10th Cir. 1990), cert. denied,

498 U.S. 856 (1990). 

In this case, appellant’s sentence was not imposed in violation of law. The

sentence was at the low end of the applicable sentencing range. Appellant’s

sentence also was not imposed as a result of an incorrect application of the

guidelines. Appellant was given opportunity to object to the criminal history

computation in appellant’s presentence report, and the district court reduced the

range within which appellant was to be sentenced. Appellant has pointed to no

error in calculating the sentence imposed. As we have previously concluded,

section 3742(a) does not allow an appeal “‘because of a claim that a particular

sentence is draconian.’” Richardson, 901 F.2d at 870 (quoting United States v.
- 3 -

Guerrero, 894 F.2d 261, 267 (7th Cir. 1990)). We therefore dismiss the appeal

for lack of jurisdiction. See United States v. Garcia, 919 F.2d 1478, 1482 (10th

Cir. 1990) (dismissing appeal of sentence within proper guideline range for lack

of jurisdiction). 

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT,

Deanell Reece Tacha

Circuit Judge
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4941 

To amend the Animal Welfare Act to protect common household pets from 

harmful confinement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2018 

Mr. MARINO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Animal Welfare Act to protect common 

household pets from harmful confinement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep Our Pets Safe 

5 Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON HARMFUL CONFINEMENT OF 

7 COMMON HOUSEHOLD PETS. 

8 The Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.) is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following new section: 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4941 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 30. PROHIBITION ON HARMFUL CONFINEMENT OF 

2 COMMON HOUSEHOLD PETS. 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for any per4 son to knowingly confine a common household pet in a 

5 motor vehicle or other enclosed space if such confinement 

6 could harm or kill such common household pet through— 

7 ‘‘(1) exposure to excessive heat or cold; 

8 ‘‘(2) lack of ventilation; or 

9 ‘‘(3) lack of water. 

10 ‘‘(b) DEFINITION OF COMMON HOUSEHOLD PET.— 

11 In this section, the term ‘common household pet’ means 

12 a domesticated animal that is traditionally kept in the 

13 home for pleasure rather than for commercial purposes, 

14 including a dog, cat, bird, rodent, rabbit, fish, or turtle. 

15 ‘‘(c) PENALTY.—Whoever violates subsection (a) 

16 shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, impris17 oned not more than 1 year, or both, for each violation.’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Order entered June 25, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00006 - CR No. 05 - 15 - 0000 7 - CR No. 05 - 15 - 0000 8 - CR No. 05 - 15 - 0000 9 - CR

GARY WAYNE BARNES SR ., Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F80 - 16530 - J; F81 - 01027 - J; F81 - 01105 - J; F81 - 02518 - J 

### O RDER We GRANT Official Court Reporter Kimberly Xavier’s June 23, 2015 request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s r ecord. The reporter’s record shall be due FIFTEEN DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
NOTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ROYAL J. O'BRIEN,

Appellant

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Appellee

______________________

2022

- 2140

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021

- 00015.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

M ARK L. L ORBIECKI

, Williams Kastner PLLC, Seattle,

WA, argued for appellant.

J OSEPH A. M ICALLEF

, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington,

DC, argued for appellee.

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED : Case: 22-2140 Document: 35 Page: 1 Filed: 11/13/2023P ER C URIAM (D YK

, R EYNA

, and S TARK

, Circuit

Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

November 13, 2023

Date Case: 22-2140 Document: 35 Page: 2 Filed: 11/13/2023
----

----

II Rättsakter vilkas publicering inte är obligatorisk

Kommissionen

----

KOMMISSIONENS BESLUT

av den 19 juli 2006

om antagande, enligt rådets direktiv 92/43/EEG, av en förteckning över områden av gemenskapsintresse i den mediterrana biogeografiska regionen

[delgivet med nr K(2006) 3261]

(2006/613/EG)

EUROPEISKA GEMENSKAPERNAS KOMMISSION HAR ANTAGIT DETTA BESLUT

med beaktande av fördraget om upprättandet av Europeiska gemenskapen,

med beaktande av rådets direktiv 92/43/EEG av den 21 maj 1992 om bevarande av livsmiljöer samt vilda djur och växter (1), särskilt artikel 4.2 tredje stycket, och

av följande skäl:

HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE.

Artikel 1

Förteckningen i bilaga 1 till detta beslut skall utgöra den preliminära förteckningen över områden av gemenskapsintresse i den mediterrana biogeografiska regionen i enlighet med artikel 4.2 tredje stycket i direktiv 92/43/EEG.

Förteckningen skall mot bakgrund av ytterligare förslag från medlemsstaterna ses över i enlighet med artikel 4 i direktiv 92/43/EEG, för vissa livsmiljötyper och arter som anges i bilagorna 2 och 3 till detta beslut.

Artikel 2

Detta beslut riktar sig till medlemsstaterna.

Utfärdat i Bryssel den 19 juli 2006.

På kommissionens vägnar

Stavros DIMAS

Ledamot av kommissionen

----

(1)EGT L 206, 22.7.1992, s. 7. Direktivet senast ändrat genom Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EG) nr 1882/2003 (EUT L 284, 31.10.2003, s. 1).

(2)EGT L 107, 24.4.1997, s. 1.

(3)  Dom av den 11 september 2001 i mål C-71/99.

----

BILAGA 1

Preliminär förteckning över områden av gemenskapsintresse i den mediterrana biogeografiska regionen

Områden av gemenskapsintresse (SCI) identifieras genom de uppgifter som har lämnats i Natura 2000-formuläret, bland annat en karta över området. Uppgifterna har lämnats av de behöriga nationella myndigheterna i enlighet med artikel 4.1 andra stycket i direktivet (utom för de livsmiljötyper och arter som anges i bilaga 2 till detta beslut).

Nedanstående tabell omfattar följande information:

All information i nedanstående gemenskapsförteckning grundas på de uppgifter som Spanien, Frankrike, Grekland, Italien, Portugal och Förenade kungariket föreslagit, överlämnat och bekräftat.

----

BILAGA 2

Förteckning över livsmiljötyper och arter för vilka kommissionen inte kan dra slutsatsen att nätet är fullständigt

----

BILAGA 3

Förteckning över livsmiljötyper och arter för vilka det krävs ytterligare klargöranden för den marina miljön

Förteckning över livsmiljötyper och arter som är föremål för en vetenskaplig granskning

----
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 19

- 00475

- CR

IN RE BYRRONE WATSON

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this original proceeding Byrrone Watson seeks mandamus relief against the

Brazos County Clerk and the Brazos County Director of Collections. A court of appeals

has no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a county clerk or the director of

collections except to protect or enfo rce its jurisdiction. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 22.221

(West 2004). We dismiss Watson’s writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

JOHN E. NEILL

JusticeIn Re Watson Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Dismissed

Opinion d elivered and filed January 8, 2020

Do not publish

[OT06]
**Exhibit 32.1** **Certification    of Chief Executive Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant    to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the    undersigned officer of Triple Net Properties, LLC, the Manager    of NNN 2002 Value Fund, LLC (the “Company”) hereby    certifies, to his knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006    (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company. /s/  Scott    D. Peters    Scott D. Peters*Chief Executive Officer*    Triple Net Properties, LLC    the Manager of NNN 2002 Value Fund, LLC*(principal executive officer)* Date:    March 14, 2007         The foregoing certification is being furnished with the    Company’s    Form 10-K    for the period ended December 31, 2006 pursuant to    18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for    purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference    into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the    date hereof, regardless of any general information language in    such filing.
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE Section 1350

     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 of Lincoln Benefit Life
Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lincoln
Benefit Life Company.


Date:  March 24, 2004


                                                 /s/ Casey J. Sylla
                                                 ------------------
                                                 Casey J. Sylla
                                                 Chairman of the Board and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

                                                 /s/ Steven E. Shebik
                                                 --------------------
                                                 Steven E. Shebik
                                                 Senior Vice President and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
# C_2008272EN.01004101.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/41

---

Action brought on 19 August 2008 — Hess Group v OHIM — Coloma Navarro (COLOMÉ)

(Case T-341/08)

(2008/C 272/81)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Hess Group AG (Berna, Switzerland) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, A. Castán Pérez-Gómez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: José Félix Coloma Navarro (Badajoz, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the action against the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 May 2008 lodged in time and in the required form and, via the appropriate procedure, order the annulment of that decision and order expressly that OHIM pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the action against the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 May 2008 lodged in time and in the required form and, via the appropriate procedure, order the annulment of that decision and order expressly that OHIM pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Word mark ‘COLOMÉ’ for goods in Class 33 (wines) (Application for Registration No 2.140.283).

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant.

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: D. José Félix Coloma Navarro.

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity:

Trade mark right of applicant for the declaration: Spanish figurative marks ‘COLOMA’ for goods in Class 33 (wines).

Trade mark right of applicant for the declaration:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Application for declaration of invalidity upheld.

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark.

Pleas in law:

---
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Chief Judge Fitzpatrick, Judge Bumgardner and Senior Judge Hodges 

SUSAN ELAINE MANOLA 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* 

v. Record No. 2367-03-4 PER CURIAM 

 JUNE 29, 2004 

FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Kathleen G. Walsh, on brief), for appellant. 

 (Michael N. Salveson; Hunton & Williams, LLP, on brief), for 

appellee. 

 Susan Elaine Manola (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Commission finding that she failed to prove the medical treatment rendered by Dr. Stephen M. 

Levin from November 2000 through July 16, 2001, constituted reasonable and necessary medical 

attention within the meaning of the Workers’ Compensation Act. We have reviewed the record 

and the commission’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Manola v. Fairfax (County of) School 

Board, VWC File No. 199-88-11 (Aug. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument and 

summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code 

§ 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.1

Affirmed.

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

1

 Because we summarily affirm the commission’s decision, we will assume, without 

deciding, that claimant timely filed her notice of appeal.
Exhibit 33.2**MANAGEMENT’S ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE**Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is responsiblefor assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation ABpromulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.Management has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122 (d) of Regulation AB areapplicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period as follows:Platform: Publicly-issued (*i*.*e*., transaction-level reporting initially requiredunder the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) automobile loan or lease-backedsecurities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, for whichthe Company provides the following servicing functions (the “Platform”): trustee and payingagent services.Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), tothe extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performedby the Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for the followingcriteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi),1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management hasdetermined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to thePlatform (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the “Period”).With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management provides thefollowing assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria: **•** The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance withthe Applicable Servicing Criteria.  **•** The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable ServicingCriteria. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by theSecurities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.  **•** Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, withthe Applicable Servicing Criteria.KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect tomanagement’s assertion of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for thePeriod.      **CITIBANK, N.A.**