alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA

California Environmental Protection Agency

STAFF REPORT: INITIAL STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR RULEMAKING

PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE LARGE CONFINED ANIMAL FACILITY DEFINITION

Release Date: May 6, 2005 Scheduled for Consideration: June 23-24, 2005

### size range such as engines over50 horsepower. In both these cases, the criteria for

determining ifthe source is regulated are based on the size ofthe process, and not specificallythe emissions. Also, the San Joaquin ValleyAPCD, when adopting Rule 4550, based the animal feeding operation sizes on capturing more than 70 percent ofthe animal populations (SJV2004a). Dueto manyfactors, the headcount based approach,.which addresses the majority ofthe livestock emissions, is the most beneficial, reasonable, and effective method fordefining large confined animal facilities. One otherconsideration in establishing proposed facilitysize cuts was whetherthe natural break points resulted in equitabletreatment between the different livestock categories. As Table 24 shows, the proposed thresholds generally result in similar amounts ofemissions from the differenttypes oflivestockfacilities, based on current emission estimates. Table24. Livestock Facility Emissions at Proposed Size Cuts

Livestock ROG ROG Category Head (tons/year) Head (tons/year) Dairy 1,000 milking cows 7.2 2,000 milking cows 14.4 Beef Feedlots 2,500 6.9 5,000 13.8 Other Cattle Operations 7,500 8.0 15,000 15.9 Chickens

-- Broilers 650,000 8.1 1,300,000 16.1 Chickens

-- Egg Layers 500,000 6.2 1,000,000 12.4 Turkeys 100,000 3.2 200,000 6.4 Swine 3,000 6.9 6,000 13.8 Sheep 15,000 7.2 30,000 14.4 Goats 15,000 7.2 30,000 14.4 Horses 2,500 8.4 5,000 16.8 Ducks 650,000 8.1 1,300,000 16.2 Notes: The base emission factor (FE) fordairy, beef, and othercattle operations is 12.8 lbs/head/year. The emissionsforthese categories are scaled based on manure outputofvarious animal classes and the animal composition in the SJV. The layer, turkey, and duck FE are scaled based on the recently released broiler FE. Other EFs arefrom theARB emission estimation methodology (ARB 2004a). Nnn~iff~inmpnf Areas Attainment Areas



### 33
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies(the “Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004,(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Tony Chung                        |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Tony Chung, Vice President of Finance |
| December 27, 2004                     |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Kentucky Electric Steel, Inc.'s condensed financial statements as of and 
for the twelve month period ended September 26, 1998 included in this 
Company's annual report on Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such condensed financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000910394
<NAME>              KENTUCKY ELECTRIC STEEL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
<CURRENCY>          U.S. DOLLARS
        
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>       	        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          SEP-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>             SEP-27-1997           
<PERIOD-END>               SEP-26-1998           
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                      1  
<CASH>                             150      
<SECURITIES>                         0  
<RECEIVABLES>                   12,497      
<ALLOWANCES>                       460   
<INVENTORY>                     20,363   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                38,404
<PP&E>                          49,567
<DEPRECIATION>                  14,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  80,251
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           24,251
<BONDS>                         20,000 
<COMMON>                            50
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0 
<OTHER-SE>                      35,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    80,251
<SALES>                        109,456
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               109,456
<CGS>                           97,720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   97,720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               2,395
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  2,410 
<INCOME-TAX>                       916 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              1,494 
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0 
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                     1,494 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      .32 
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .32 

</TABLE>
#### PORTLAND FEMINIST WOMEN’S HEALTH CLINIC, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; Amy Aycrigg; Geri Craig, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ADVOCATES FOR LIFE, INC., an Oregon nonprofit corporation; et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 91-35512.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 19, 1993.

Before: BEEZER, NOONAN and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed in this case on September 20,1993 is hereby ordered recalled and withdrawn. Submission of this case is also again ordered deferred pending a decision by this court in *National Abortions Federation, et al., v. Operation Rescue, et al.,*No. 90-55199.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                       CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of
Verdisys, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Andrew Wilson, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                             /s/ ANDREW WILSON
                             ------------------------------------
                             Name:   Andrew Wilson
                             Title:  Principal Accounting Officer
                             Date:   November 20, 2003

A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Verdisys, Inc. and will be retained by Verdisys, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4992 

To amend the Clean Air Act to direct permitting authorities to notify municipalities within 30 miles of a source of certain permit applications and 

proposed permits, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2018 

Ms. ESTY of Connecticut (for herself and Mr. LANCE) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Clean Air Act to direct permitting authorities 

to notify municipalities within 30 miles of a source of 

certain permit applications and proposed permits, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Notify Officials, 

5 Towns, Individuals, and Cities of Electric Generating Fa6 cilities Act of 2017’’ or the ‘‘NOTICE Act of 2017’’. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4992 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLEAN AIR ACT AMENDMENT. 

2 (a) AMENDMENT.—Section 505(a)(2) of the Clean 

3 Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7661d(a)(2)) is amended to read as 

4 follows: 

5 ‘‘(2) The permitting authority shall notify— 

6 ‘‘(A) all States— 

7 ‘‘(i) whose air quality may be affected and 

8 that are contiguous to the State in which the 

9 emission originates, or 

10 ‘‘(ii) that are within 50 miles of the source, 

11 and 

12 ‘‘(B) all municipalities that are within 30 miles 

13 of the source, 

14 of each permit application (and any application for a per15 mit modification or renewal) or proposed permit forwarded 

16 to the Administrator under this section, and shall provide 

17 an opportunity for such States and municipalities to sub18 mit written recommendations respecting the issuance of 

19 the permit and its terms and conditions. If any part of 

20 those recommendations are not accepted by the permitting 

21 authority, such authority shall notify the State or munici22 pality submitting the recommendations and the Adminis23 trator in writing of its failure to accept those recommenda24 tions and the reasons therefor.’’. 

25 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4992 IH

1 (1) The heading of section 505 of the Clean Air 

2 Act (42 U.S.C. 7661d) is amended by striking ‘‘NO3 TIFICATION TO ADMINISTRATOR AND CONTIG4 UOUS STATES’’ and inserting ‘‘NOTIFICATION TO

5 ADMINISTRATOR, CONTIGUOUS STATES, AND

6 CERTAIN MUNICIPALITIES’’. 

7 (2) The item relating to section 505 in the table 

8 of contents of title V of the Clean Air Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 7661 et seq.) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘Sec. 505. Notification to Administrator, contiguous States, and certain municipalities.’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Madison BancShares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert B. McGivney, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |              |  |  |  |     |  |                                                         
|----- |  | ------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|      |  |              |  | 
|Date: |  | May 11, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert B. McGivney                                  
|      |  |              |  |  |  |     |  |                                                         
|      |  |              |  |  |  |     |  | Robert B. McGivney, President andChief Executive Officer
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 494 

AN ACT 

To expand the boundary of Fort Frederica National 

Monument in the State of Georgia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 494 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fort Frederica Na3 tional Monument Boundary Expansion Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FORT FREDERICA NATIONAL MONUMENT, GEORGIA. 

5 (a) MAXIMUM ACREAGE.—The first section of the 

6 Act of May 26, 1936 (16 U.S.C. 433g), is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘two hundred and fifty acres’’ and inserting ‘‘305 

8 acres’’. 

9 (b) BOUNDARY EXPANSION.— 

10 (1) IN GENERAL.—The boundary of the Fort 

11 Frederica National Monument in the State of Geor12 gia is modified to include the land generally depicted 

13 as ‘‘Proposed Acquisition Areas’’ on the map enti14 tled ‘‘Fort Frederica National Monument Proposed 

15 Boundary Expansion’’, numbered 369/132,469, and 

16 dated April 2016. 

17 (2) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map described 

18 in paragraph (1) shall be on file and available for 

19 public inspection in the appropriate offices of the 

20 National Park Service. 

21 (3) ACQUISITION OF LAND.—The Secretary of 

22 the Interior may acquire the land and interests in 

23 land described in paragraph (1) by donation or pur24 chase with donated or appropriated funds from will25 ing sellers only. 
3 

•HR 494 EH

1 (4) WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER.—No non2 Federal property may be included in the Fort Fred3 erica National Monument without the written con4 sent of the owner. 

5 (5) NO USE OF CONDEMNATION OR EMINENT

6 DOMAIN.—The Secretary of the Interior may not ac7 quire by condemnation or eminent domain any land 

8 or interests in land under this Act or for the pur9 poses of this Act. 

10 (6) NO BUFFER ZONE CREATED.—Nothing in 

11 this Act, the establishment of the Fort Frederica 

12 National Monument, or the management plan for 

13 the Fort Frederica National Monument shall be con14 strued to create buffer zones outside of the Monu15 ment. That activities or uses can be seen, heard, or 

16 detected from areas within the Fort Frederica Na17 tional Monument shall not preclude, limit, control, 

18 regulate, or determine the conduct or management 

19 of activities or uses outside of the Monument. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 6, 

2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 494 

AN ACT 

To expand the boundary of Fort Frederica National 

purposes. Monument in the State of Georgia, and for other
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to



Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the
Report) of MCG Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bryan J. Mitchell, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify,
to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    BRYAN J. MITCHELLName: Bryan J. MitchellDate: November 4, 2005
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, John Kang, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Liquidmetal Technologies;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)   designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)  evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 daysprior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)   presented in this quarterlyreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)   all significant deficienciesin the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialdata and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknessesin internal controls; and

 

b)  any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether ornot there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factorsthat could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of ourmost recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard tosignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Date: May  13, 2005 | /s/ John  Kang                                   |   |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                | John Kang                                        |
|                | Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                | (Principal  Executive Officer)                   |

 

1

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 10, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1569-1570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00336]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator and Foreign 
Utility Company Status

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nova Power, LLC........................................       EG24-1-000
Crow Creek Solar, LLC..................................       EG24-2-000
Inertia Energy Storage, LLC............................       EG24-3-000
Torrecillas Energy Storage, LLC........................       EG24-4-000
Ben Milam Solar 1 LLC..................................       EG24-5-000
Ben Milam Solar 3 LLC..................................       EG24-6-000
Salt Creek Township Solar, LLC.........................       EG24-7-000
BCD 2024 Fund 1 Lessee, LLC............................       EG24-8-000
South Cheyenne Solar, LLC..............................       EG24-9-000
Sunlight Storage II, LLC...............................      EG24-10-000
Willowbrook Solar I, LLC...............................      EG24-11-000
Cedar Creek Wind, LLC..................................      EG24-12-000
St. Gall Energy Storage I, LLC.........................      EG24-13-000
Silver Peak Energy, LLC................................      EG24-14-000
Wild Springs Solar, LLC................................      EG24-15-000
Skysol, LLC............................................      EG24-16-000
Beaumont ESS, LLC......................................      EG24-17-000
Placerita ESS, LLC.....................................      EG24-18-000
Poblano Energy Storage, LLC............................      EG24-19-000

[[Page 1570]]

 
Century Oak Wind Project, LLC..........................      EG24-20-000
Black Walnut Energy Storage, LLC.......................      EG24-21-000
CPV Stagecoach Solar, LLC..............................      EG24-22-000
Faraday Interconnection LLC............................      EG24-23-000
Faraday Solar B LLC....................................      EG24-24-000
Condor Energy Storage, LLC.............................      EG24-25-000
Babbitt Ranch Energy Center, LLC.......................      EG24-26-000
Windpark Duben S[uuml]d GmbH & Co. KG..................       FC24-1-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of December 2023, the status of 
the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign 
Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's 
regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a) (2022).

    Dated: January 4, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-00336 Filed 1-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
**Order of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 22 April 2009 – Bundesverband Deutscher Milchviehhalter and Others
v Council**

**(Case T-217/08)**

Action for annulment – Regulation (EC) No 248/2008 – Milk quota scheme – Increase in national milk quotas – Applicants not individually concerned –Inadmissible

1.                     *Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them –**Regulation modifying**national quotas for milk – Measure of general scope – Action by milk producers – Applicants not individually concerned**– Inadmissibility (Art. 230, fourth para., EC; Council Regulation No 248/2008) (see paras 29, 33-40, 46)*

2.                     *European Communities – Judicial review of the legality of the acts of the institutions – Measures of general scope (Arts 230,
fourth para., EC, 234 EC, 235 EC, 241 EC and 288, second para., EC) (see paras 50-52)*

3.                     *Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Action brought by a
trade association set up to protect and represent its members – Admissibility – Conditions (Art. 230, fourth para., EC) (see
para. 55)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 248/2008 of 17 March 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards the national quotas for milk (OJ 2008 L 76, p. 6). |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The action is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | The Bundesverband Deutscher Milchviehhalter eV, Romuald Schaber, Stefan Mann and Walter Peters are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | The Commission is ordered to bear its own costs. |