alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 10.1.4

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 4
                             1993 STOCK OPTION PLAN

                              THE MAXIM GROUP, INC.


        WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of The Maxim Group, Inc. (the "Company")
has previously adopted, and the shareholders of the Company have approved, the
1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended (the "Plan") pursuant to which options to
purchase stock of the Company may be issued to eligible directors, officers and
key employees of the Company; and

        WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company deems it desirable to
amend the Plan so as to increase the number of shares available for issuance
pursuant to the exercise of options granted under the Plan;

        NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended upon the terms, and subject to the
conditions, set forth herein:

                                    ARTICLE I

                                AMENDMENT TO PLAN

        1.1 Section 4 of the Plan shall be amended by deleting the second
sentence thereof in its entirety and substituting the following sentence
therefor:

                         "The maximum number of shares which shall be reserved
                         and made available for sale under the Plan shall be
                         4,000,000."


                                   ARTICLE II

                           EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT

        2.1 The amendment effected hereby shall be effective for options granted
under the Plan on or after the date this amendment is approved by the Board of
Directors of the Company, but subject to approval of a majority of the shares of
Common Stock of the Company entitled to vote thereon represented in person and
by proxy at a meeting of shareholders. In the event shareholder approval of
adoption of this amendment is not obtained within twelve months of the date this
amendment is approved by the Board of Directors of the Company, then any option
granted in the intervening period shall be void.
# C_2008272EN.01003601.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/36

---

Action brought on 12 August 2008 — Cimino v Commission

(Case T-321/08)

(2008/C 272/69)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Riccardo Cimino (Castelsardo, Italy) (represented by: A. Maiorana, A. De Matteis and A. De Francesco, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Commission Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 of 12 June 2008, published in OJ L 155 of 13 June 2008. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Commission Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 of 12 June 2008, published in OJ L 155 of 13 June 2008.

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those relied on in Case T-313/08 Veromar di Tudisco Alfio & Salvatore S.n.c v Commission.

Veromar di Tudisco Alfio & Salvatore S.n.c

Commission

---
Exhibit 13.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B d e C.V. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: The Annual Report on form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results from operations of the Company. Date: June 17, 2011

   /s/ Carlos Salazar LomelínCarlos Salazar LomelínChief Executive OfficerDate: June 17, 2011

   /s/ Héctor Treviño GutiérrezHéctor Treviño GutiérrezChief Financial Officer


---
# C_2008197EN.01003201.xml

| 2.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/32

---

Action brought on 4 June 2008 — Amertranseuro International Holdings and Others v Commission

(Case T-212/08)

(2008/C 197/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Amertranseuro International Holdings Ltd (London, United Kingdom), Trans Euro Ltd (London, United Kingdom) and Team Relocations Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: L. Gyselen, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Article 2(i) of the Commission Decision of 11 March in Case COMP/38.543 — International removal services, in so far as it holds the applicants jointly and severally liable for Team Relocations NV's alleged infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA in the period of January 1997 to September 2003; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Article 2(i) of the Commission Decision of 11 March in Case COMP/38.543 — International removal services, in so far as it holds the applicants jointly and severally liable for Team Relocations NV's alleged infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA in the period of January 1997 to September 2003;

| — | in the alternative, annul Article 2(i) of this Commission decision in so far as it does not effectively limit the joint and several liability of Amertranseuro Ltd to the amount of EUR 1,3 million; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Article 2(i) of this Commission decision in so far as it does not effectively limit the joint and several liability of Amertranseuro Ltd to the amount of EUR 1,3 million;

| — | order the costs of the proceedings to be borne by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the costs of the proceedings to be borne by the Commission.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants seek partial annulment, pursuant to Article 230 EC, of Commission Decision C(2008) 926 final of 11 March (Case COMP/38.543 — International removal services) (‘the contested decision’), relating to a proceeding under Article 81(1) EC and Article 53(1) EEA. More specifically, the applicants seek the annulment of Article 2(i) of the contested decision in so far as it holds them jointly and severally liable for the alleged participation of Team Relocations NV (‘TRNV’) in the infringement described in Article 1 of the contested decision.

The applicants put forward two pleas in law in support of their claims:

First, they submit that the Commission erred by holding all three of them liable in spite of the fact that they were neither aware, nor could have been aware of TRNV's involvement in the alleged infringement. Second, the applicants claim that the Commission misused its powers by imposing a fine which they are unable to pay.

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 No. 333-42533 and No. 333-86001 (pertaining to the 1993
Stock Option Plan, the 1995 Stock Option Plan, and the 1998 Stock Option Plan,
as amended and restated), and Forms S-3 No. 333-33710, No. 333-51250 and No.
333-53538 of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated February 20, 2001,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Titan Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2000.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Palo Alto, California
March 30, 2001
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00917-CR

IN RE Larry Montoya CANTU

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 2, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On December 23, 2010, relator Larry Montoya Cantu filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus. Relator asserts he filed a writ of habeas corpus in the trial court in which he 

complains he has never been “personally magistrated.” To the extent relator seeks a writ from 

this court ordering that relator be released, the writ is denied. To the extent relator’s complaint is 

that the trial court has failed to rule on his writ of habeas corpus, counsel has been appointed to 

represent relator in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court for which he is currently 

confined. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State, 

240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. 

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-CR-9404, styled State of Texas v. Larry Montoya Cantu, pending in 

the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Melissa Skinner presiding. However, at the 

time the petition was filed, the Honorable Sharon Macrae was the presiding judge of the 290th Judicial District 

Court, Bexar County, Texas.
04-10-00917-CR

-2-

App. 1995). A trial court has no legal duty to rule on pro se motions or petitions filed with 

regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by counsel. See Robinson, 

240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to rule 

on relator’s pro se motions filed in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court. 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
#### DAWSON v. STATE.

No. A-11883.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Feb. 10, 1954.

Percy Hughes, Hobart, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

JONES, Judge.

The defendant Felix Dawson was charged in the County Court of Kiowa County with the offense of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor and was tried to a jury, who found the defendant guilty and assessed his punishment at 30 days imprisonment in the county jail and a fine of $100. From a sentence in conformity to the verdict, the defendant hás appealed.

There have been no briefs filed on behalf of the defendant and no appearance was made on behalf of the defendant at the time the case was set for oral argument.

In Johnson v. State, 70 Okl.Cr. 430, 107 P.2d 365, it is stated:

> “Where no briefs are filed and no appearance for oral argument. made, this court will examine the record and the evidence, and if it is sufficient to sustain the verdict, and no fundamental error appears', the judgment will be: affirmed.”

See also, Ferguson v. State, 71 Okl.Cr. 50, 107 P.2d 808; Bruner v. State, 69 Okl.Cr. 317, 102 P.2d 945; Thompson v. State, 73 Okl.Cr. 243, 119 P.2d 873.

We have carefully examined .the record. E. O. Peters, Sheriff of. Kiowa County, testified that he searched the premises of- Felix Dawson and found 72 pints of assorted intoxicating liquors, consisting *1008of whiskey and gin.' "The defendant offered evidence to disprove his possession,'hut this presented an issue for determination of the jury. We have found no error in the record and it is apparent that the appeal is wholly without merit.'

The judgment and sentence of the County .Court of Kiowa County is affirmed.

POWELL, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1527]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        STOLEN VALOR ACT OF 2012

                                 ______
                                 

                               speech of

                        HON. MICHAEL H. MICHAUD

                                of maine

                    in the house of representatives

                      Tuesday, September 11, 2012

  Mr. MICHAUD. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize yesterday's 
passage in the House of H.R. 1775, the Stolen Valor Act.
  I, unfortunately, was not able to vote on passage of this important 
bill because of a commitment back in my district. I joined with New 
Balance associates at the factory in Norridgewock, Maine to press U.S. 
Trade Representative Ron Kirk on the importance of preserving current 
footwear tariffs, which are threatened by the Trans-Pacific 
Partnership, a multinational free trade agreement that is currently 
being negotiated. I truly appreciated Ambassador Kirk's visit and the 
opportunity to join him and New Balance's highly skilled workers, but I 
regret that this prevented me from helping to pass H.R. 1775, the 
Stolen Valor Act.
  Had I been able to be present for the vote, I would have vote for the 
Stolen Valor Act. This Act appropriately creates penalties for 
individuals who benefit from lying about military decorations or 
medals. Our service members and veterans make an unparalleled 
commitment to our nation. They earn military honors through their 
sacrifices, and I am pleased that the Stolen Valor Act has passed the 
House to better protect the interests of those who have served our 
country.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 11


                               WVS Financial Corp.
                 Statement Re Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Three Months Ended           Twelve Months Ended
                                               June 30,                      June 30,
                                         1997           1996            1997           1996
                                      -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------
<S>                                   <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Weighted average common shares
  outstanding .....................     1,743,286      1,736,505      1,738,563      1,736,426

Average unearned ESOP shares ......       (47,697)       (59,809)       (53,665)       (62,745)
Common stock equivalents
  (stock options) .................        66,100         62,562         67,318         58,667
                                      -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------
Weighted average common shares
  and common stock equivalents
  used to calculate primary
  earnings per share ..............     1,761,689      1,739,258      1,752,216      1,732,348

Additional common stock equivalents
  (stock options) used to calculate
  fully diluted earnings per share          1,776             69          2,226          2,119
                                      -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------

Weighted  average common shares and
  common stock  equivalents
  used to calculate
  fully diluted earnings
  per share .......................     1,763,465      1,739,327      1,754,442      1,734,467
                                      ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========

Net income ........................   $   882,559    $   775,674    $ 2,958,878    $ 3,576,646
                                      ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========

Earnings per share:
  Primary .........................   $      0.50    $      0.45    $      1.69    $      2.06
  Fully diluted ...................   $      0.50    $      0.45    $      1.69    $      2.06
                                      ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========
</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Houston Progressive Radiology Associates, PLLC, Rodolfo L. Garcia 

and Brandon C. Stroh v. Stephen B. Lee, M.D.. P.A. a Texas 

Professional Association , Dean Paul Chauvin, Jr., M.D., P.A., a Texas 

Professional Association, and Michael Nguyen, M.D.

Appellate case number: 01-14-00467-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-12279

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

On June 30, 2014, counsel for appellant Houston Progressive Radiology Associates, 

PLLC filed an Unopposed Motion to Substitute Counsel. A motion to substitute counsel must be 

delivered to Houston Progressive Radiology Associates, PLLC “in person or mailed—both by 

certified and by first-class mail” in order to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

6.5(b), (d). The motion does not indicate that it was delivered to Houston Progressive Radiology 

Associates, PLLC in person or by mail. The motion is DENIED, without prejudice to refiling.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 22, 2014
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4605 

To repeal restrictions on the export and import of natural gas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2017 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio (for himself, Mr. LATTA, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. FLORES, 

Mr. CUELLAR, and Mr. RYAN of Ohio) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To repeal restrictions on the export and import of natural 

gas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Unlocking Our Domes5 tic LNG Potential Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IMPORT AND EXPORT OF NATURAL GAS. 

7 Section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) 

8 is amended— 

9 (1) by striking subsections (a) through (c); 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4605 IH

1 (2) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as 

2 subsections (a) and (b), respectively; 

3 (3) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub4 section (c), and moving such subsection after sub5 section (b), as so redesignated; 

6 (4) in subsection (a), as so redesignated, by 

7 amending paragraph (1) to read as follows: ‘‘(1) The 

8 Commission shall have the exclusive authority to ap9 prove or deny an application for the siting, construc10 tion, expansion, or operation of a facility to export 

11 natural gas from the United States to a foreign 

12 country or import natural gas from a foreign coun13 try, including an LNG terminal. Except as specifi14 cally provided in this Act, nothing in this Act is in15 tended to affect otherwise applicable law related to 

16 any Federal agency’s authorities or responsibilities 

17 related to facilities to import or export natural gas, 

18 including LNG terminals.’’; and 

19 (5) by adding at the end the following new sub20 section: 

21 ‘‘(d) Nothing in this Act limits the authority of the 

22 President under the Constitution, the International Emer23 gency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the 

24 National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), part 

25 B of title II of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4605 IH

1 (42 U.S.C. 6271 et seq.), the Trading With the Enemy 

2 Act (50 U.S.C. App. 1 et seq.), or any other provision 

3 of law that imposes sanctions on a foreign person or for4 eign government (including any provision of law that pro5 hibits or restricts United States persons from engaging 

6 in a transaction with a sanctioned person or government), 

7 including a foreign government that is designated as a 

8 state sponsor of terrorism, to prohibit imports or ex9 ports.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


         The  undersigned   executive   officer  of  WVS  Financial  Corp.  (the
"Registrant")  hereby certifies that the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained
therein fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.




                                                /s/ Keith A. Simpson
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Keith A. Simpson
                                                Vice-President and
                                                Chief Accounting Officer


Date: September 29, 2008


Note:    A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 of
         the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has been provided to WVS Financial  Corp.  and
         will be retained by WVS Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities
         and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 !
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 "
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 #
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 $
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 %
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 &
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 '
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 (
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 )
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 !
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 "
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 #
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 $
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 %
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 &
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 '
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 (
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 ! )
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 ! 
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 ! !
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 ! "
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 ! #
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 ! $
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 ! %
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 ! &
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 ! '
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 ! (
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 " )
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 " 
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 " !
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 " "
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 " #
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 " $
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 " %
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 " &
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 " '
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 " (
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 # )
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 # 
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 # !
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 # "
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 # #
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 # $
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 # %
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 # &
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 # '
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 # (
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 $ )
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 $ 

2 3 ) 45 ,3 2 3' 6 ' 3 7 ) 689 3 & , : 3 ,& '& ' ; : 3 ,&
 ! "# # % & ' ( ) * + % ) ,-. / + 0 1 1 $ !

9 3. 8- <3 = > ? > = = @ A @ B B C = D E 1# >% F C B C B G G >B ? D A C H @