2258 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices 

document all outputs, outcomes, and 

impacts they can find in their document 

reviews. These will be aligned with the 

list of required outputs, outcomes, and 

impacts that NSF must report to 

Congress (e.g., number and 

demographics of teachers, number and 

demographics of students served by the 

grant). 

Produce grantee profile memos for 

grantee verification. After the 

researchers complete the document 

review forms for each funded RPP grant 

to the best of their ability, the 

information will be summarized in a 

memo to be shared with each grantee for 

their review and to gather any missing 

information. PIs will be asked to 

provide any missing information, 

focused on known outputs, outcomes, 

and impacts up to at least 5 years after 

funding was received. After they have 

had time to review the form and gather 

the missing information, each PI will be 

invited to participate in 30–60 minute 

interview conducted via 

videoconferencing. The interview will 

be conducted by a member of the 

research team, with the purpose of 

confirming the outputs, outcomes, and 

impacts in the document review form, 

and following up with any remaining 

questions about the impact of the grant 

on preK–12 computer science education 

in the education systems that were 

served by the grant. 

Finalize grantee-provided data and 

identify additional primary data 

collections. Any additional information 

provided by grantees will be added to 

the review document forms to finalize 

existing grantee data and to determine 

what additional data are needed to 

address research questions, the most 

appropriate method for collecting that 

information (e.g., surveys, interviews, 

focus groups), and from whom (e.g., 

district or school administration, 

teachers). Because this evaluation 

project involves providing NSF with 

insights about other relevant outcomes 

and impacts they may not have 

anticipated for this evaluation, the 

information collected from grantees’ 

completion of the document review 

form and their interviews will be used 

to identify those additional outcomes 

and impacts. 

Use of the Information 

Much of the data needed for this 

collection will come from a review of 

the Annual Reports, Final Reports, 

Evaluation Reports, and Project 

Outcome Reports that grantees are 

required to submit to NSF. After a 

systematic review of all grantee 

documents for the 73 funded grants, 

necessary information will be extracted 

from the documents and reviewed by 

grantee PIs, following the steps outlined 

in the abstract. 

ESTIMATE OF PUBLIC BURDEN

Collection title Number of respondents Annual number of responses/respondent Annual hour 

burden 

Verification of Document Review Form 

Information by RPP Grantees.

73 grantee PIs ......................................... 2 (1 hour for document review and up to 

1 hour for follow-up call).

146 

Respondents 

The respondents are the Principal 

Investigator and/or program evaluator of 

each grant. They will be asked to review 

their grantee-specific memo, determine 

whether their data are accurately 

represented, and provide any additional 

available information during a 30–60- 

minute call. 

Estimates of Annualized Cost to 

Respondents for the Hour Burdens 

The overall annualized cost to the 

respondents is estimated to be 

$8,085.48. The following table shows 

the annualized estimate of costs to PIs/ 

designee respondents, who are generally 

university research faculty members. 

This estimated hourly rate is based on 

the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ 

Occupational Employment and Wage 

Statistics from May 2022, for 

‘‘Education Administrators, 

Postsecondary.’’ According to these 

estimates, the mean hourly wage for a 

postsecondary education administrator 

was $55.38. 

Respondent type Number of 

respondents 

Burden hours 

per 

respondent 

Average 

hourly rate 

Estimated 

annual cost 

Grantees/PIs .................................................................................................... 73 2 $55.38 $8,085.48 

Total .......................................................................................................... 73 ........................ ........................ 8,085.48 

Source: https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes119033.htm. 

Estimated Number of Responses per 

Report 

Data collection involves all 73 

grantees for the funded CSforAll RPP 

grants in the 2017, 2018, and 2019 

cohorts. 

Dated: January 9, 2024. 

Suzanne H. Plimpton, 

Reports Clearance Officer, National Science 

Foundation. 

[FR Doc. 2024–00593 Filed 1–11–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. MC2024–161 and CP2024–167] 

New Postal Products 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recent Postal Service filing for the 

Commission’s consideration concerning 

a negotiated service agreement. This 

notice informs the public of the filing, 

invites public comment, and takes other 

administrative steps. 

DATES: Comments are due: January 17, 

2024. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http://

www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit 

comments electronically should contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section by 

telephone for advice on filing 

alternatives. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 

202–789–6820. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2024 / Notices 2259 

1See Docket No. RM2018–3, Order Adopting 

Final Rules Relating to Non-Public Information, 

June 27, 2018, Attachment A at 19–22 (Order No. 

4679). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Docketed Proceeding(s) 

I. Introduction 

The Commission gives notice that the 

Postal Service filed request(s) for the 

Commission to consider matters related 

to negotiated service agreement(s). The 

request(s) may propose the addition or 

removal of a negotiated service 

agreement from the Market Dominant or 

the Competitive product list, or the 

modification of an existing product 

currently appearing on the Market 

Dominant or the Competitive product 

list. 

Section II identifies the docket 

number(s) associated with each Postal 

Service request, the title of each Postal 

Service request, the request’s acceptance 

date, and the authority cited by the 

Postal Service for each request. For each 

request, the Commission appoints an 

officer of the Commission to represent 

the interests of the general public in the 

proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505 

(Public Representative). Section II also 

establishes comment deadline(s) 

pertaining to each request. 

The public portions of the Postal 

Service’s request(s) can be accessed via 

the Commission’s website (http://

www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of 

the Postal Service’s request(s), if any, 

can be accessed through compliance 

with the requirements of 39 CFR 

3011.301.1

The Commission invites comments on 

whether the Postal Service’s request(s) 

in the captioned docket(s) are consistent 

with the policies of title 39. For 

request(s) that the Postal Service states 

concern Market Dominant product(s), 

applicable statutory and regulatory 

requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39 

U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3030, and 39 

CFR part 3040, subpart B. For request(s) 

that the Postal Service states concern 

Competitive product(s), applicable 

statutory and regulatory requirements 

include 39 U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633, 

39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3035, and 

39 CFR part 3040, subpart B. Comment 

deadline(s) for each request appear in 

section II. 

II. Docketed Proceeding(s) 

1. Docket No(s).: MC2024–161 and 

CP2024–167; Filing Title: USPS Request 

to Add Priority Mail, USPS Ground 

Advantage, & Parcel Select Contract 3 to 

Competitive Product List and Notice of 

Filing Materials Under Seal; Filing 

Acceptance Date: January 8, 2024; Filing 

Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 

3040.130 through 3040.135, and 39 CFR 

3035.105; Public Representative: 

Kenneth R. Moeller; Comments Due: 

January 17, 2024. 

This Notice will be published in the 

Federal Register. 

Jennie L. Jbara, 

Alternate Certifying Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2024–00587 Filed 1–11–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P 

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request 

In accordance with the requirement of 

section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 which provides 

opportunity for public comment on new 

or revised data collections, the Railroad 

Retirement Board (RRB) will publish 

periodic summaries of proposed data 

collections. 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed information collection is 

necessary for the proper performance of 

the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information has practical 

utility; (b) the accuracy of the RRB’s 

estimate of the burden of the collection 

of the information; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and (d) 

ways to minimize the burden related to 

the collection of information on 

respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

1. Title and purpose of information 

collection: RUIA Investigations and 

Continuing Entitlement; OMB 3220– 

0025. 

Under Section 1(k) of the Railroad 

Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA) 

(45 U.S.C. 231), unemployment and 

sickness benefits are not payable for any 

day remuneration is payable or accrues 

to the claimant. Also, Section 4(a–1) of 

the RUIA provides that unemployment 

or sickness benefits are not payable for 

any day the claimant receives the same 

benefits under any law other than the 

RUIA. Under Railroad Retirement Board 

(RRB) regulation 20 CFR 322.4(a), a 

claimant’s certification, or statement on 

an RRB-provided claim form, that he or 

she did not work on any day claimed 

and did not receive income such as 

vacation pay or pay for time lost, shall 

constitute sufficient evidence unless 

there is conflicting evidence. Further, 

under 20 CFR 322.4(b), when there is a 

question raised as to whether or not 

remuneration is payable or has accrued 

to a claimant with respect to a claimed 

day(s), an investigation shall be made 

with a view to obtaining information 

sufficient for a finding. The RRB utilizes 

the following three forms to obtain 

information from railroad employers, 

nonrailroad employers, and claimants, 

that is needed to determine whether a 

claimed day(s) of unemployment or 

sickness were improperly or 

fraudulently claimed: Form ID–5i, 

Request for Employment Information; 

Form ID–5R (SUP), Report of Employees 

Paid RUIA Benefits for Every Day in 

Month Reported as Month of Creditable 

Service; and Form UI–48, Statement 

Regarding Benefits Claimed for Days 

Worked. Completion is voluntary. One 

response is requested of each 

respondent. 

To qualify for unemployment or 

sickness benefits payable under section 

2 of the Railroad Unemployment 

Insurance Act (RUIA), a railroad 

employee must have certain qualifying 

earnings in the applicable base year. In 

addition, to qualify for extended or 

accelerated benefits under Section 2 of 

the RUIA, a railroad employee who has 

exhausted his or her rights to normal 

benefits must have at least 10 years of 

railroad service (under certain 

conditions, military service may be 

credited as months of railroad service). 

Accelerated benefits are unemployment 

or sickness benefits that are payable to 

a railroad employee before the regular 

July 1 beginning date of a benefit year 

if an employee has 10 or more years of 

service and is not qualified for benefits 

in the current benefit year. 

During the RUIA claims review 

process, the RRB may determine that 

unemployment or sickness benefits 

cannot be awarded because RRB records 

show insufficient qualifying service 

and/or compensation. When this occurs, 

the RRB allows the claimant the 

opportunity to provide additional 

information if they believe that the RRB 

service and compensation records are 

incorrect. 

Depending on the circumstances, the 

RRB provides the following forms to 

obtain information needed to determine 

if a claimant has sufficient service or 

compensation to qualify for 

unemployment or sickness benefits. 

Form UI–9, Statement of Employment 

and Wages; Form UI–44, Claim for 

Credit for Military Service; Form ID–4U, 

Advising of Service/Earnings 

Requirements for Unemployment 

Benefits; and Form ID–4X, Advising of 

Service/Earnings Requirements for 

Sickness Benefits. Completion of these 

forms is required to obtain or retain a 

benefit. One response is required of 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES