alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 30 September 2009 – Ivanov v Commission**

**(Case T-166/08)**

Non-contractual liability – Local administrative and technical staff – Rejection of application – Jurisdiction of the Court – Annulment action time-barred – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Act of the European Ombudsman – Action partially inadmissible and partially manifestly devoid of any legal basis

1.                     *Actions for damages – Subject-matter – Claim for compensation in respect of damage for which the Community liable – Exclusive
jurisdiction of the Community judicature (Art. 288, second para., EC) (see para. 41)*

2.                     *Actions for damages – Independent of actions for annulment – Action seeking the withdrawal of an individual decision which
has become definitive – Inadmissibility (Art. 235 EC) (see paras 51-52)*

3.                     *Non-contractual liability – Conditions (Art. 288, second para., EC) (see paras 70-72)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION for compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicant following the Commission’s decision refusing to recruit him as a local administrative and technical assistant at the Commission delegation in Sofia (Bulgaria). |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The action is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Mr Vladimir Ivanov is ordered to pay the costs. |
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6538]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        REMEMBERING HENRY MOORE

 Mr. CASEY. Mr. President, today I rise to honor and remember 
Henry L. Moore for his exceptional service to his community, 
Commonwealth, an country.
  Born April 8, 1921 in Ocilla, GA, the son of Andrew and Eliza Moore, 
Henry entered the armed services on September 22, 1942. Though 
originally from the Peach State, Henry spent his adult life living in 
Pennsylvania.
  Henry was a man of service, a man of science, and a man of faith. 
Today I wish to honor him as such.
  As a man of service, Henry distinguished himself as one of the 
Tuskegee Airmen who so faithfully served our country during one of its 
darkest hours. Drafted in 1942, Henry graduated from the only class of 
African-American airplane mechanics at Lincoln Airbase in Nebraska in 
June 1943. After graduation he was assigned to the ground crew of the 
Fifteenth Air Force 332nd Fighter group. By 1944 Henry had become a 
crew chief working on B-25 bombers in the Mediterranean theater.
  The Tuskegee Airmen hold a special place in American history, and 
Henry never forgot his part in it. Throughout the rest of his life, he 
remained active in the Tuskegee Airmen Inc., a nonprofit organization 
dedicated to honoring the accomplishments of African Americans in the 
U.S. Army Air Corps during WWII and introducing young people across the 
Nation to the world of aviation and science through local and national 
programs. At the time of his passing, Henry was serving his second term 
as the national parliamentarian of that organization.
  As a man of science, Henry graduated from West Virginia State College 
with a bachelor of science in physics and electrical engineering and 
later with a master of science from Temple University. Following 
graduation, Henry began a career physics and electronic engineering 
until retiring from government service after 26 years.
  Henry loved science, and, following his retirement, he continued to 
pass this passion on by teaching science and math, first at Roosevelt 
Middle School and then later at Abraham Lincoln High School in the 
Philadelphia school district.
  As a man of faith, Henry was very active in his church. Always 
involved, Henry served on a number of boards and was president of both 
the deacons and trustees. His love of music intertwined with his church 
life as he sang in the choir and on special occasions played his 
trumpet.
  As Henry's family and friends mourn his loss, I pray that they will 
be comforted by the knowledge that this great Nation will never forget 
the service and sacrifice of Henry L. Moore. May he rest in 
peace.

                          ____________________
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 5, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.                           ( print page 816)                        3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 28, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 163 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-151, CP2024-157.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-29012 Filed 1-4-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
FILED01 MAY 10 PM 3:36SECRETARY OF STATETALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
 
 ,
 Name
  Purpose
  Agent
  Existence
  Address




---



##### 



Capital Stock
  Preemptive Rights, Cumulative Voting
  Directors
  Name
    
    AddressRoy W. Lassiter
    
    493 E. Semoran Blvd.Casselberry, FL 32707George P. Daniels
    
    493 E. Semoran Blvd.Casselberry, FL 32707Stephen T. Rumsey
    
    493 E. Semoran Blvd.Casselberry, FL 32707
 Incorporator
  2




---



##### 



Officers
  Office
    
    Name and AddressPresident
    
    Roy W. LassiterVice President-Secretary
    
    George P. DanielsVice President-Treasurer
    
    Stephen T. Rumsey
 Indemnification
   3




---



##### 



,
 /s/ Stephen T. RumseySTEPHEN T. RUMSEYIncorporator  /s/ Mary Louise WaltonNOTARY PUBLIC  STATE OF FLORIDAMARY LOUISE WALTONPRINTED NAME OF NOTARY; COMMISSIONNUMBER AND EXPIRATION OF COMMISSION (SEAL)
    
    MARY LOUISE WALTONNotary Public, State of FloridaPersonally known to me þ or o
    
    
    My Comm. Exp. Apr. 23, 2002Produced the following identification:
    

    
    Comm. No. CC 713181
 4




---



##### 



FILED01 MAY 10 PM 3:36SECRETARY OF STATETALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
 CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION  REGISTERED AGENT
     
  NOT
  
 SIGNATURE
    /s/ Roy W. LassiterROY W. LASSITERTITLE PresidentDATE  May 3, 2001  SIGNATURE
    /s/ George DanielsGEORGE DANIELSDATE  05/3/01
REGISTERED AGENT FILING FEE: $35.00
Per capita market income is a measure of an area's total 

personal income, less transfer payments, divided by the 

resident population of the area. The percent of the U.S. 

average is computed by dividing the county per capita 

market income by the national average and multiplying by 

100. The map uses critical breaks such as the national 

average to organize the data into groups of common values.

Map Created: August 2017

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2015

Relative Per Capita Market Income Rates in Appalachia, 2015

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

25.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.9%

100.0% - 125.8%

Percent of the U.S. Average

U.S. average = $39,778

Appalachian average = $29,282

(Critical Breaks Classification)
exh10-45.htm


 










Exhibit 10.45


 


Management Termination Agreement


 







 


Re: Management Consulting Services Agreement dated July 1, 2007 among Transax International Limited (the “Company”), Transax Limited, and Carlingford Investments Limited (the “Management Agreement”)


 


The undersigned hereby confirms and agrees that the above referenced Management Agreement has not been assigned by the undersigned and is hereby terminated.  Further, the undersigned confirms and agrees that no amounts are owed to the undersigned under the Management Agreement and waives any rights it may have to any compensation payable to the undersigned under such agreement.


 







 


Carlingford Investments Limited


 







 


Sign: /s/ Stephen Walters


 


Title: Principle


 


Name: Stephen Walters


 


Date: December 30, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                       177
<INVENTORY>                                     34,015
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,972
<PP&E>                                          20,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,419
<BONDS>                                          7,272
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            62
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,470
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,050
<SALES>                                        137,101
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               137,101
<CGS>                                          118,643
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,643
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 357
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,010
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,405
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,605
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,605
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.24
        

</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4959 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that the temporary 

refundable portion of the child tax credit is not less than the payroll 

taxes paid by the taxpayer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2018 

Mr. BUDD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure 

that the temporary refundable portion of the child tax 

credit is not less than the payroll taxes paid by the 

taxpayer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Working Families Re5 lief Act of 2018’’. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4959 IH

1 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY REFUNDABLE PORTION OF CHILD TAX 

2 CREDIT NOT LESS THAN PAYROLL TAXES 

3 PAID BY TAXPAYER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 24(h)(5)(A) of the Inter5 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d)(1)(A) 

7 shall be applied without regard to paragraph 

8 (4) of this subsection and the amount deter9 mined under subsection (d)(1)(A) shall not ex10 ceed the greater of— 

11 ‘‘(i) $1,400, or 

12 ‘‘(ii) the excess of— 

13 ‘‘(I) the taxpayer’s social security 

14 taxes (as defined in subsection (d)(2)) 

15 for the taxable year, over 

16 ‘‘(II) the credit allowed under 

17 section 32 for the taxable year.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

20 December 31, 2017. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
1

The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the

Southern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3699

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

Ramon T. Morales, also known as *

Munchies, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: October 6, 2006 

 Filed: October 23, 2006

___________

Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Ramon Morales pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of firearms and

to possessing a firearm with an obliterated serial number in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§§ 922(g)(1), (k), and 2. After this court vacated his original sentence and remanded

for resentencing under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), the district

court1

 resentenced him to concurrent prison terms of 64 months on the first count and

60 months on the second count, to be followed by concurrent terms of two years of
-2-

supervised release. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief

under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the district court erred

in applying U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) (4-level enhancement for using or possessing any

firearm or ammunition in connection with another felony offense). Specifically,

counsel argues that the enhancement is erroneous because it is based on a prior

conviction that was unrelated to the instant offense and the firearms involved. We

reject counsel’s argument and affirm.

We review de novo the district court’s legal conclusions concerning the

application of section 2K2.1(b)(5), and we review the underlying factual findings for

clear error. See United States v. Anderson, 339 F.3d 720, 724 (8th Cir. 2003)

(standard of review). It is undisputed that Morales has a prior conviction for

aggravated discharge of a firearm, and thus the district court properly concluded that

he used “any firearm . . . in connection with another felony offense”; we have

expressly held that section 2K2.1(b)(5) applies for other felony offenses that occurred

distinct from the offense of conviction and that “the firearm used in another felony

need not be the same firearm involved in the offense of conviction.” See United

States v. Davis, 360 F.3d 901, 902-04 (8th Cir. 2004).

After our review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80

(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to

withdraw, and we affirm. 

______________________________
Amendment to the Advisory Agreement dated January 1, 2012



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO THE ADVISORY AGREEMENT 
 This
AMENDMENT dated as of the 1st day of January 2012 to the ADVISORY AGREEMENT made as of the 30th day of April, 2007, among CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC (formerly Demeter Management Corporation), a Delaware limited liability company (the “Trading Manager”), MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY WNT I,
LLC (formerly Morgan Stanley Managed Futures WCM I, LLC), a Delaware limited liability company (the “Trading Company”) and WINTON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED, a United Kingdom company (the “Trading Advisor”). 

W I T N E S S E T H: 

WHEREAS, the Trading Manager, the Trading Company and the Trading Advisor wish to amend the Advisory Agreement dated as of April 30,
2007 to increase the amount of leverage used to manage the Trading Company’s assets and reflect a change in the Trading Advisor’s management fee compensation (from 2% per year to 1.5% per year). 

NOW, therefore, the parties agree as follows: 
 1. The first sentence of Section 2(f) shall be deleted and replaced by the following: 
 In performing services to the Trading Company, the Trading Advisor shall utilize its Diversified Trading Program (the “Trading Program”), as described in the Disclosure Document, and as modified
from time to time; provided, however, that the Trading Manager and the Trading Company agree that amount of leverage applied to the assets of the Trading Company allocated to the Trading Advisor by the Trading Manager shall be up to
(but not in excess of) 1.5 times the assets of the Trading Company allocated to the Trading Advisor by the Trading Manager (the “Trading Level”), unless otherwise agreed by the parties hereto in writing. The Trading Advisor shall trade the
Trading Company’s assets on the basis of the Trading Level. 
 2. The first sentence of Section 5(a)(i) shall be
deleted and replaced by the following: 
 The Trading Company shall pay the Trading Advisor a monthly
management fee equal to 1/12 of *% (a *% annual rate) of the Assets (as defined in Section 2(a) hereof) of the Trading Company allocated to the Trading Advisor as of the first day of each month (the “Management Fee”).* 

 

	*	This information has been redacted in accordance with the Order Granting Confidential Treatment Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, dated January 14, 2009,
File No. 000-53113 - CF#21688, and the Order Granting Confidential Treatment Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, dated January 14, 2009, File No. 000-53114- CF#21687. 








 3. In all other respects the Advisory Agreement remains unchanged and of full force and
effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed for and on behalf of the undersigned as of the day and year
first above written. 
  

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By	 	 
		 	 Walter Davis

President

	
	MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY WNT I, LLC
		
	By:	 	 Ceres Managed Futures LLC

(Trading Manager)

		
	By	 	 
		 	 Walter Davis

President

	
	WINTON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED
		
	By	 	 
		 	 Martin Hunt
 Director,
Winton Capital Management Limited




  
 -2 -
VENDOR PROFILE

Note: Information is from vendor, however specifications may have 

changed. Contact vendor for updates.

Water Treatment Catalog and Decision Tool

Ecosphere Technologies, Inc.

Contact Information

Company Name: Ecosphere Technologies, Inc.

Profile: Ecosphere is a water engineering and services company that 

offers three water treatment options for shale gas producers: 

Ozonix EcosFracTM, a process that is used prior to fracturing to 

remove bacteria to help reduce scaling and corrosion; Ozonix

EcosBrineTM, a mobile water recycling unit that treats flowback 

water for removal of heavy metals, organics and cations; and an 

optional reverse osmosis system. To date, Ecosphere has 

conducted a pilot program with Devon Energy Corporation in the 

Barnett Shale, Newfield Exploration Mid-Continent, Inc. in the 

Woodford Shale and Southwestern Energy in the Fayetteville 

shale. 

Address: 3515 S.E. Lionel Terrace, Stuart, FL 34997

Phone: 772-287-4846

Website: http://www.ecospheretech.com/

Treatment Technology

Category: Membrane and Microbe Removal

Subcategory: Reverse Osmosis/UV & Ozonation

Technology Name: OzonixTM

Surface Footprint Approximately 380 ft2

Process 

Description:

Initial water treatment steps of the Ozonix process involves 

placing raw water into storage tanks to allow solids to settle, and 

then passing the water through a cartage filtration system to 

further reduce TSS. Scale inhibitors are then applied to reduce 

scaling. Next, super-saturated ozonated water is flash mixed with 

the influent and dual-frequency ultrasonic transducers initiate the 

dissolved gas flotation of oils and suspended solids and the 

conversion of ozone to hydroxyl radicals. Nano-cavitation 

bubbles imploded to provide the liquid-gas interface that is 

instantaneously heated to approximately 900oF, which in turn 

oxidizes all known organic compounds. Ultrasonic cavitation 

cleaves larger particles into smaller particles for faster removal 

by flotation. The last step of the Ozonix process, if required, 

separates brine from fresh water by using RO technology.

Feedwater TDS/

% Water Recovery 20,000 – 30,000 mg/L, approximately 50%-70% water recovery 
VENDOR PROFILE

Note: Information is from vendor, however specifications may have 

changed. Contact vendor for updates.

Water Treatment Catalog and Decision Tool

% Waste Stream:

Feed Capacity: EcoFracTM

, 120 barrels per minute; EcosBrineTM, 300 BBls per 

hour, Ozonix (to include RO), 100 gpm.

Costs:

EcosFracTM (pre-treatment) : $0.60 to $0.75 per bbl; 

EcosBrineTM : approximately $2.00 per bbl

OzonixTM Process to include RO: $3.50 - $4.00 per bbl