alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****Certifications for Form 10-Q**I, Daniel L. Erickson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Alliance Bancshares California;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a—15(e) and15d—15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         Date: August 10, 2007 Name:  /s/ Daniel L. Erickson   Title:      Executive Vice President
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.61


                       SECOND AMENDMENT TO FOURTH AMENDED
                           AND RESTATED LOAN AGREEMENT


     This Second Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated
as of December 29, 2000, by and between Citizens Bank of Massachusetts (herein
"BANK"), and The J. Jill Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, formerly DM
Management Company (herein "BORROWER").

                                   WITNESSETH:

     WHEREAS, BANK and BORROWER are parties to that certain Fourth Amended and
Restated Loan Agreement made as of August 7, 2000, as affected by First
Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of September
22, 2000 by and between BANK and BORROWER (collectively, the "Loan Agreement");
and

     WHEREAS, BORROWER and the BANK wish to amend the Loan Agreement as more
particularly hereafter set forth. Capitalized terms used herein without
definition shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Loan Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements herein
contained, the parties hereby agree that the Loan Agreement is hereby amended as
follows:

     1. Section 11.15 of the Loan Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety
        and the following is substituted therefor:

                    "11.15 Without obtaining the BANK'S prior written consent,
               the BORROWER shall not permit capital expenditures (net of tenant
               allowances) for the twelve (12) month period ending December 31,
               2000 to exceed Twenty Million Dollars ($20,000,000)."

        This Amendment shall take effect as of the date first above written.

        Except as hereby amended, the Loan Agreement is hereby ratified,
confirmed and republished.



<PAGE>


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals as of
the date first above written.

Witness:                               THE J. JILL GROUP, INC.

/s/ DAVID ANDREWS                      By: /s/ PETER J. TULP
-----------------------                    -------------------------------------
                                       Name: Peter J. Tulp
                                             -----------------------------------
                                       Title: CORPORATE CONTROLLER/VP FINANCE
                                              ----------------------------------


Witness:                               CITIZENS BANK OF MASSACHUSETTS

/s/ MARYALICE TROTTIER                 By: /s/ LORI B. LEETH SVP
----------------------                     -------------------------------------
                                           Lori B. Leeth, Senior Vice President
Exhibit 32.3

Certification of Chief Accounting Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010(the Report) of MCG Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Linda A. Nimmons, the Chief Accounting Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ LINDA A. NIMMONSName:

Linda A. NimmonsTitle:

Chief Accounting OfficerDate

November 2, 2010
#### Norman Leo REID, Petitioner, v. Robert R. RAINES, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Respondent.

No. A-13077.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Jan. 24, 1962.

*669Norman Leo Reid, petitioner, pro se.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Lewis A. Wallace, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The record before us reflects defendant was confined in the Oklahoma State Penitentiary on the 17th day of February, 1961, and is now restrained of his liberty by reason of a judgment and sentence made and entered on the same date, where defendant plead guilty to the crime of armed robbery, and sentenced to a term of 10 years in the Oklahoma State Penitentiary.

Petitioner seeks by way of writ of habeas corpus his release from the penitentiary upon the sole grounds that he was insane at the time of his plea and could not have been responsible for his plea or acceptance of the judgment and sentence.

 In the opinion of this court this does not constitute a matter that is to be raised in a habeas corpus proceeding.

The court said in the case of Hanger v. Raines, Okl.Cr., 357 P.2d 251:

> “A habeas corpus proceedings is not available to review the question of whether one detained under a sentence entered upon a plea of guilty in a prosecution for the crime of indecent acts toward a minor child under the age of 14 years after former conviction of a felony, was insane at the time of the commission of the offense.

> “The question of insanity at the time of the commission of an offense as a defense to a criminal prosecution therefore, must be raised at the trial and determined by the jury upon the evidence relevant thereto.”

The question raised by petitioner should have been raised at the time of judgment and sentence or by ^notion to set aside the judgment and sentence or by direct appeal, not by habeas corpus.

The writ is therefore denied.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5002 

To expand the unique research initiatives authority of the National Institutes 

of Health. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2018 

Mrs. DINGELL (for herself and Mr. UPTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To expand the unique research initiatives authority of the 

National Institutes of Health. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Advancing Cutting 

5 Edge Research Act’’ or the ‘‘ACE Research Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. UNIQUE RESEARCH INITIATIVES. 

7 Section 402(n)(1) of the Public Health Service Act 

8 (42 U.S.C. 282(n)(1)) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5002 IH

1 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period 

2 and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(C) high impact cutting-edge research 

5 that fosters scientific creativity and increases 

6 fundamental biological understanding leading to 

7 the prevention, diagnosis, or treatment of dis8 eases and disorders, or research urgently re9 quired to respond to a public health threat.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 503 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 503

  To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for an additional 
        judge for the district of Idaho, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2017

 Mr. Labrador introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for an additional 
        judge for the district of Idaho, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Responding to Idaho's Judicial 
Emergency Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. FINDING.

    The Congress finds that a judicial emergency (as such term is used 
by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts) exists within 
the district of Idaho and is resulting in a significant delay in the 
administration of justice for the citizens of Idaho.

SEC. 3. ADDITIONAL JUDGE AUTHORIZED.

    (a) In General.--The President shall appoint, by and with the 
advice and consent of the Senate 1 additional district judge for the 
district of Idaho.
    (b) Tables Conformed.--In order that the table contained in section 
133 of title 28, United States Code, will, with respect to each 
judicial district, reflect the change in the total number of permanent 
district judgeships authorized under subsection (a), such table is 
amended in the item relating to the district of Idaho by striking ``2'' 
and inserting ``3''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1642]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    WORLD ALZHEIMER'S AWARENESS DAY

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. PETER J. ROSKAM

                              of illinois

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. ROSKAM. Mr. Speaker, I would like to express my support for the 
ongoing efforts of this body and the American people to conquer the 
devastating disease of Alzheimer's. Alzheimer's is one of the top 10 
causes of death in America, and the only one without a way to prevent, 
cure, or even slow its progression. While death rates from diseases 
such as stroke, heart disease, and breast cancer have fallen since the 
year 2000, deaths from Alzheimer's have increased by 66 percent.
  Alzheimer's disease affects over 5 million Americans who are cared 
for by more than 15 million caregivers. These caregivers shoulder the 
heavy burden of caring for their loved ones and forgoing paid positions 
while watching the disease progress without the possibility of a cure.
  I have several constituents who have been impacted by this disease 
but two stand out for me personally. Cathy and her daughter Grace have 
been tireless advocates for their cause. Cathy's husband was diagnosed 
with early onset Alzheimer's and she has seen the effects up close. 
Each year they have taken time out of their schedules to travel to DC 
and as well as my district office to update me on her husband's 
condition and express their hopes that we can get closer to curing this 
awful disease. Grace has even taken her advocacy to the Roll Call Forum 
to speak on her mother and father's behalf. This is why I support the 
National Alzheimer's Plan.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
       
<S>                                                           
                                                    <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                                            3-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
   <PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1998
   <CASH>                                                  $1,286
   <SECURITIES>                                                 0
   <RECEIVABLES>                                                0
   <ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
   <INVENTORY>                                                  0
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         2,426
   <PP&E>                                                 599,981
   <DEPRECIATION>                                          18,523
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         598,324
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   19,053
   <BONDS>                                                227,559
   <COMMON>                                                   453
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
   <PREFERRED>                                                  0
   <OTHER-SE>                                             347,136
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           598,324
   <SALES>                                                      0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        73,674
   <CGS>                                                        0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                                0
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        30,897
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      11,164
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                                         31,496
   <INCOME-TAX>                                                 0 
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     31,496
   <DISCONTINUED>                                               0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
   <CHANGES>                                                    0
   <NET-INCOME>                                            31,496
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                             1.39
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                             1.38
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                              ARM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
                                515 WEST MARKET STREET
                              LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY 40202


                                                  December 4, 1997

Mr. David E. Ferguson
ARM Financial Group, Inc.
515 West Market Street
Louisville, Kentucky 40202

Dear David:

          This letter amendment (this "AMENDMENT") sets forth our mutual
understanding concerning an amendment to your Employment Agreement with ARM
Financial Group, Inc. (the "COMPANY") dated as of July 1, 1996 (the "EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT").

          1.   Section 5.1.1 is hereby amended by inserting the words "the
     penultimate sentence of this Section 5.1.1 and" after the word "of" in the
     first line of Section 5.1.1.

          2.   Section 5.1.1 is hereby further amended by inserting the
     following as the penultimate sentence in such Section 5.1.1:

          "In the event the Executive terminates his employment hereunder
          pursuant to Section 5.4(iv) or (v), the payments described in the
          first sentence of this Section 5.1.1 shall be reduced by an amount
          equal to the payments received by the Executive as a Sale Bonus under
          the Company's Sale Bonus Plan."

          3.   The parenthetical contained in the second line of Section 5.4 is
     amended in its entirety to read as follows: "(without the Executive's prior
     written consent in the case of clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) below)".

          4.   Section 5.4 is further hereby amended by inserting a new
     subsection (ii) to read as follows and to renumber the subsections that
     follow accordingly:

               "(ii) a material diminution of the authority, responsibilities or
          positions of the Executive with the Company;"



<PAGE>

                                          2

          5.   This Amendment shall be governed in accordance with the laws of
     the State of New York.

          6.   Except as modified hereby, the Employment Agreement remains in
     full force and effect.

          Please evidence your agreement with this Amendment by executing the
acknowledgment set forth below.

                                        ARM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

                                        /s/ Frank V. Sica
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Name:
                                        Title:

ACKNOWLEDGED AND
AGREED AS OF THE DATE
FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN

/s/ David E. Ferguson
----------------------------
David E. Ferguson
EXHIBIT 31.2
 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
              /s/ James R. TalevichJames R. TalevichChief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 73760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30755]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7699]

In the Matter of the Designation of Imad Fa'iz Mughniyah also 
Known as Imad Fayiz Mughniyah as a Specially Designated Global 
Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    In accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as 
amended (``the Order''), I hereby determine that the individual known 
as Imad Fa'iz Mughniyah, also known as Imad Fayiz Mughniyah, no longer 
meets the criteria for designation under the Order, and therefore I 
hereby revoke the designation of the aforementioned individual as a 
Specially Designated Global Terrorist pursuant to section 1(b) of the 
Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: October 24, 2011.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-30755 Filed 11-28-11; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
#### Gordon POST et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. KINGDOM HALL OF JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES et al., Defendants in Error.

No. 36625.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 3, 1955.

*529Melville F. Boddie, Oklahoma City, for plaintiffs in error.

John Connolly, Oklahoma . City, for defendants in error.

WELCH, Justice.

■ This action was commenced'by plaintiffs to enjoin defendants from building a church. The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiffs’ amended petition and entered a judgment of dismissal and plaintiffs have appealed. Meanwhile it is made to appear that the church has been constructed and is now being occupied and used by the defendants.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason the question has 'become moot. The motion must be sustained. Drummond v. City of Ada, 86 Okl. 32, 206 P. 200, and Christensen v. Quality Oil Co., 205 Okl. 212, 236 P.2d 673.

 In Christensen v. Quality Oil Co. supra, it is said:

> “A court will not entertain an action to enjoin a party from doing that which he has already done.

> “When the question presented by an appeal has become moot, the appeal will be dismissed.”

Appeal dismissed.

JOHNSON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and CORN, DAVISON, HALLEY, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.
Appendix C

PICTURES FROM THE SAMPLING EPISODE
C-1

Figure C-1. Sampler Working Inside a “Cleanbox”
C-2

Figure C-2. Sample Tap and Tubing at the Influent to the FGD Wastewater Treatment 

System
C-3

Figure C-3. Sample Collection Set Up at the Pump-Off Station
C-4

Figure C-4. Composite Sample Collection Set Up at the Effluent from the FGD Wastewater 

Treatment System
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.18

March 18, 2005

Mr. Hugh Sawyer
President
Allied Automotive
160 Clairemont Avenue
Suite 600
Decatur, Georgia  30030

Dear Mr. Sawyer:

Referencing your meeting with Brad Ross and Mike O'Donnell, this will confirm
our fuel surcharge agreement for the period of January 2, 2005 to January 1,
2006, and only for that one-year period; GM will waive the application of the
[XXXXX] limit on the amount to be paid as a fuel allowance under the terms of
the Contract for Motor Transportation dated as of January 2, 2004 between
General Motors Corporation and Allied Automotive Group, Inc.

Regards,

/s/ Pernell Weatherabee

Pernell Weatherabee, Manager
Vehicle Logistics Operations

----------------------------

[XXXX]  Represents material deleted per the Company's request for Confidential
        Treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934, as amended.