alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4850 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4850

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to alter the deadlines by 
 which an application for asylum must be made, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2018

  Mr. Francis Rooney of Florida (for himself, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. 
 Brooks of Alabama, Mr. Farenthold, Mr. DesJarlais, Mr. Budd, and Mr. 
   Norman) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to alter the deadlines by 
 which an application for asylum must be made, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Asylum Protection Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. DATES OF APPLICATIONS FOR ASYLUM.

    Section 208(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1158(a)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``1 year'' and inserting ``30 days''; and
            (2) by adding before the period at the end the following: 
        ``, except that, in the case of an alien who arrives at a 
        designated port of arrival, that alien shall be required to 
        commence an application at the time of arrival''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1643]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                ROBERT E. LEE HIGH SCHOOL INTERACT CLUB

                                 ______
                                 

                              HON. TED POE

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. POE of Texas. Mr. Speaker, today, I want to recognize the 
important contributions that the Robert E. Lee High School Interact 
Club has made to the Baytown, Texas community. For over 50 years, the 
club has proudly served our community. This is quite an accomplishment 
in and of itself, but in the last year alone, the club has completed 
over 900 hours of community service.
  Sponsored by the Baytown Rotary, the club's community service 
projects last year included the annual cancer fundraiser, Relay for 
Life; campus clean up events; hosting a Red Ribbon Week, and serving 
meals at the Baytown Thanksgiving community dinner. The club also held 
a Trick-or-Treat for Hunger event where it collected 1,587 canned goods 
to donate to our community.
  With a motto of ``service above self'', the club's members are 
learning many important life lessons: how to be selfless; how to be a 
leader; how to be a person of integrity; how to respect others and how 
to help someone during a difficult time. The members may be young in 
age--only teenagers--but they are putting these life lessons into 
action and making important contributions to the Baytown community.
  The Baytown community has been enriched by the members of the Robert 
E. Lee Interact Club and will continue to be as the students put 
service above self for the next 50 years. And that's just the way it 
is.

                          ____________________
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130938 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130938 

 COA: 268376 

Kalamazoo CC: 04-001546-FH 

JAMES EDWARD ANDERSON, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 3, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0724 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 31, 2006 

 Clerk
Exhibit 99.1
 (QUIKSILVER LOGO)
    
    Company Contact:
    
    Bruce Thomas
Vice President, Investor Relations
Quiksilver, Inc.
+1 (714) 889-2200
 - Quiksilver, Inc. Receives Binding Offer for Rossignol -  - Company to Focus on Core Apparel and Footwear Brands Quiksilver, Roxy and DC -
- Net Proceeds to be Used to Repay Indebtedness -
       About Quiksilver:




---



##### 



Quiksilver, Inc. Receives Binding Offer for Rossignol
 About Chartreuse & Mont Blanc:
   NOTE:
    
    For further information about Quiksilver, Inc., you are invited to take a look at our world atwww.quiksilver.com,
www.roxy.com,www.dcshoecousa.com,www.quiksilveredition.com,www.hawkclothing.com.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hybrid Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Holly
Roseberry, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                        /s/ Holly Roseberry
                                        ----------------------
                                        Holly Roseberry
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer

June 19, 2007


                                       24
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 8 (Thursday, January 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 1951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00387]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 11, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 42 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-159, CP2024-165.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-00387 Filed 1-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
A poverty rate is the ratio of the persons below the poverty level 

to the total number of persons for whom poverty status has been 

determined. The map uses natural breaks in the distribution to 

organize the data into groups of common values. 

Map Created: March 2013

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2007–2011

Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2007–2011

(County Rates)

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

26.5% - 42.1%

19.6% - 26.4%

14.5% - 19.5%

4.2% - 14.4%

Poverty Rate 

(Natural Breaks Classification) 

U.S. average = 14.3%

Appalachian average = 16.1%
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blast Energy Services, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John O’Keefe,
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
August 12, 2008




By:
            /s/
      John O’KeefeJohn
      O’KeefeChief
      Executive OfficerPrincipal
      Executive Officer
Form 8-K - 01/09/12 Executive Compensation (Ex. 10.1) (W0388121).DOC








Exhibit 10.1




Wausau Paper Corp.

2012 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan







A portion of each individual officer’s grant, referred to below as the “Retention Award,” will vest upon meeting certain criteria relating to continued employment with the Company.  The remaining portion of the grant, referred to below as the “Performance Incentive,” will vest upon meeting both performance and continued employment criteria.  The maximum potential award for the CEO, chief financial officer, and each of the other executive officers with segment operating responsibility is described in the “Total Opportunity” column below.




							
	 
	Performance Units Granted


	 
	Retention

Award*

	Maximum

Performance Incentive**

	Total

Opportunity


	 
	 
	 
	 

	CEO

	19,096

	 
	171,857

	 
	190,953

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Executive Vice President, Finance***

	0

	 
	0

	 
	0

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Senior Vice President, Tissue

	6,593

	 
	50,541

	 
	57,134

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Senior Vice President, Paper

	5,852

	 
	44,865

	 
	50,717

	 






      *The Retention Award is a grant of performance units equal to a specified percentage of base salary, which vests and is converted to a right to receive common stock (or, in the Compensation Committee’s discretion, cash with an equivalent value) based on continuous employment with the Company (in the same position or in a position with greater authority) through January 3, 2014.

   **The Performance Incentive is a grant of performance units equal to a specified percentage of base salary.  These performance units may vest and be converted to a right to receive common stock (or, in the Compensation Committee’s discretion, cash with an equivalent value) based on (1) continuous employment with the Company (in the same position or in a position with greater authority) through January 3, 2014; and (2) the Company’s achieving levels of Return on Capital Employed (“ROCE”) ranging from 5% ROCE to 14% ROCE for the year ended December 31, 2012.  For purposes of this plan, ROCE is determined by adjusting for extraordinary items, which may include, for example, facility closure charges, one-time expenses associated with certain major capital projects, or other similar items.  ROCE is calculated after incentive compensation expenses have been included.  No shares of common stock or cash will be awarded if earnings are at the bottom of the targeted range of ROCE, and the number of shares of common stock or cash awarded will increase on a pro rata basis to the maximum potential award if ROCE is at the top of the targeted range.

***On December 19, 2011, Scott P. Doescher, Executive Vice President, Finance, notified the Company that he intended to resign effective February 28, 2012.  As a result, annual equity incentive awards under the 2012 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan were not issued to Mr. Doescher.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4853 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4853

        To require FERC to examine certain hydropower licences.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2018

    Mr. Babin (for himself, Mr. Weber of Texas, and Mr. Higgins of 
  Louisiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To require FERC to examine certain hydropower licences.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Commonsense Flood Prevention Act''.

SEC. 2. EXAMINATION OF LICENSES FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS LOCATED IN 
              DISASTER AREAS.

    Not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall examine each license 
issued by the Commission under part I of the Federal Power Act for the 
following projects:
            (1) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 
        2305.
            (2) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 
        12362.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# TIME AND DATE: 

10 a.m., Thursday, January 11, 2024.

# PLACE: 

                        You may observe this meeting in person at 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, or virtually. If you would like to observe, at least 24 hours in advance, visit                         *FCA.gov*, select “Newsroom,” then select “Events.” From there, access the linked “Instructions for board meeting visitors” and complete the described registration process.                    

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The following matters will be considered:

    - Approval of Minutes for December 14, 2023
    - Office of Inspector General Year-in-Review Report

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

If you need more information or assistance for accessibility reasons, or have questions, contact Ashley Waldron, Secretary to the Board. Telephone: 703-883-4009. TTY: 703-883-4056.

Ashley Waldron,

Secretary to the Board. 

[FR Doc. 2024-00017 Filed 1-2-24; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
# C_2010221EN.01000901.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság (Republic of Hungary)) — Nawras Bolbol v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal

(Case C-31/09) (1)

1

(Directive 2004/83/EC - Minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees - Stateless person of Palestinian origin who has not sought protection or assistance from the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) - Application for refugee status - Refusal based on a failure to meet the conditions laid down in Article 1A of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, signed in Geneva on 28 July 1951 - Right of that stateless person to be recognised as a refugee on the basis of the second sentence of Article 12(1)(a) of Directive 2004/83)

2010/C 221/13

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Fővárosi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Nawras Bolbol

Applicant:

Defendant: Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Fövárosi Bíróság (Hungary) — Interpretation of Article 12(1)(a) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted (OJ 2004 L 304, p. 12) — Stateless person of Palestinian origin who has not availed herself of the protection and assistance of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), whose application seeking the grant of refugee status has been refused on the ground of failure to meet the conditions laid down in Article 1A of the Geneva Convention — Right of that stateless person to be granted refugee status on the basis of the second sentence of Article 12(1)(a) of Directive 2004/83/EC

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

For the purposes of the first sentence of Article 12(1)(a) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, a person receives protection or assistance from an agency of the United Nations other than the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, when that person has actually availed himself of that protection or assistance.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 04.04.2009.

1

---
#### Michael AKINS; Betty Akins, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ronald J. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellee, American Nuclear Insurers, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-16163.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 7, 1994.

Before: GOODWIN, O’SCANNLAIN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

On February 3, 1994, this court issued an opinion that affirmed the district court’s decision to abstain from hearing this case because of a pending state case. *Akins v. Rodriguez,*15 F.3d 883 (9th Cir.1994). On February 25, 1994, we stayed the mandate pending a sua sponte call for en banc reconsideration to determine whether our opinion conflicts with *Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.,*12 F.3d 908 (9th Cir.1993).

On May 12, 1994, the parties filed a stipulation for dismissal of the entire action with prejudice. Accordingly, this ease is DISMISSED pursuant to the stipulation of the parties.

This court’s opinion filed on February 3, 1994, is VACATED and the case is REMANDED with instructions to the district court to VACATE its judgment. *See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.,*340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. PD-0347-20 & PD-0348-20

RICHARD LEE PERCIVILL, JR., Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

GREGG COUNTY

YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which SLAUGHTER, J., joined.

DISSENTING OPINION

For the reasons set out in my dissenting opinion in Dulin v. State, ___ S.W.3d ___, 

Nos. PD-0856-19 & PD-1857-19, 2021 WL 1202400 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 31, 2021), I 

respectfully dissent to the Court’s disposition of the State’s petition for discretionary 

review.

FILED: May 12, 2021

DO NOT PUBLISH
#### Paula Casey, as Administratrix of the Estate of Dawn M. Bologna, Deceased, Respondent, v FDR Entertainment Co., Inc., Doing Business as Bar 231, et al., Appellants.

— In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for violations of the Dram Shop Act (General Obligations Law § 11-101), the defendants FDR Entertainment Co., Inc., doing business as Bar 231 and Valhav Ltd., doing business as Chaplin separately appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Saladino, J.), dated October 13, 1989, which denied their respective motions to dismiss the complaint insofar as it is asserted against each of them, and granted the plaintiff's cross motion to amend the caption.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

This action was brought by Paula Casey, as administratrix of the estate of her decedent daughter. The complaint alleged that on January 18, 1986, the plaintiff’s decedent, who was 19 years old at the time, was involved in an automobile accident, as the result of which she died. The complaint asserted causes of action against the manufacturer of the automobile which the decedent was driving, the driver of a car with which the decedent’s car collided, and the appellants. The causes of action asserted against the appellants alleged that they violated the Dram Shop Act (General Obligations Law § 11-101) in that they unlawfully served alcohol to the decedent.

The appellants moved to dismiss the complaint insofar as it is asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff could not, under the Dram Shop Act, maintain an action against them in her capacity as administratrix of her daughter’s estate *(see, Marsico v Southland Corp.,*148 AD2d 503; *Matala*
      *97
      *vage v Sadler,*77 AD2d 39). However, the plaintiff cross-moved for leave to amend the caption to reflect her name as the individual plaintiff. The court granted her cross motion and denied the appellants’ motions.

We find that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in allowing the plaintiff to amend the caption. The appellants were aware of the specific allegations against them and thus were not prejudiced *(see, Edenwald Contr. Co. v City of New York,*60 NY2d 957). Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.