2644 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 16, 2024 / Notices 

Bear Point (By-5, now known as 

Strickland Point) and an unknown site 

in St. Andrews Bay. The four 

unassociated funerary objects are four 

potsherds (Catalog A55/Index 149; 

Catalog A56/Index 150). The one sacred 

object is a large shell dipper (Catalog 

A57/Index 151). 

On January 25, 1955, after receiving 

Congressional authorization, the 

Smithsonian Institution officially 

transferred one lot of ‘‘Archaeological 

Specimens (duplicate) (Educational 

study collections),’’ to Colgate 

University’s Sociology and 

Anthropology Professor John Longyear 

III, Curator of the LMA (previously the 

Anthropology Museum). The five 

cultural items from Bear Point Mound 

were accessioned into the LMA 

collection at this time. 

Cultural Affiliation 

The cultural items in this notice are 

connected to one or more identifiable 

earlier groups, tribes, peoples, or 

cultures. There is a relationship of 

shared group identity between the 

identifiable earlier groups, tribes, 

peoples, or cultures and one or more 

Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian 

organizations. The following types of 

information were used to reasonably 

trace the relationship: archeological 

information, geographical information, 

historical information, and expert 

opinion. 

Determinations 

Pursuant to NAGPRA and its 

implementing regulations, and after 

consultation with the appropriate 

Indian Tribes and Native Hawaiian 

organizations, the LMA has determined 

that: 

• The four cultural items described 

above are reasonably believed to have 

been placed with or near individual 

human remains at the time of death or 

later as part of the death rite or 

ceremony and are believed, by a 

preponderance of the evidence, to have 

been removed from a specific burial site 

of a Native American individual. 

• The one cultural item described 

above is a specific ceremonial object 

needed by traditional Native American 

religious leaders for the practice of 

traditional Native American religions by 

their present-day adherents. 

• There is a relationship of shared 

group identity that can be reasonably 

traced between the cultural items and 

the Seminole Tribe of Florida and The 

Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma. 

Requests for Repatriation 

Additional, written requests for 

repatriation of the cultural items in this 

notice must be sent to the Responsible 

Official identified in ADDRESSES. 

Requests for repatriation may be 

submitted by any lineal descendant, 

Indian Tribe, or Native Hawaiian 

organization not identified in this notice 

who shows, by a preponderance of the 

evidence, that the requestor is a lineal 

descendant or a culturally affiliated 

Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian 

organization. 

Repatriation of the cultural items in 

this notice to a requestor may occur on 

or after February 15, 2024. If competing 

requests for repatriation are received, 

the LMA must determine the most 

appropriate requestor prior to 

repatriation. Requests for joint 

repatriation of the cultural items are 

considered a single request and not 

competing requests. The LMA is 

responsible for sending a copy of this 

notice to the Indian Tribes and Native 

Hawaiian organizations identified in 

this notice. 

Authority: Native American Graves 

Protection and Repatriation Act, 25 

U.S.C. 3003, and the implementing 

regulations, 43 CFR 10.8, 10.10, and 

10.14. 

Dated: January 9, 2024. 

Melanie O’Brien, 

Manager, National NAGPRA Program. 

[FR Doc. 2024–00608 Filed 1–12–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1386] 

Certain Self-Balancing Electric 

Skateboards and Components 

Thereof; Notice of Institution of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

December 5, 2023, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on 

behalf of Future Motion, Inc. of Santa 

Cruz, California. The complaint alleges 

violations of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain self-balancing electric 

skateboards and components thereof by 

reason of the infringement of certain 

claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,400,505 

(‘‘the ’505 patent’’). The complaint 

further alleges that an industry in the 

United States exists as required by the 

applicable Federal Statute. The 

complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

general exclusion order, or in the 

alternative a limited exclusion order, 

and cease and desist orders. A motion 

for temporary relief filed concurrently 

with the complaint requests that the 

Commission issue a temporary 

exclusion order prohibiting the 

importation into and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain self-balancing electric 

skateboards and components thereof 

during the course of the Commission’s 

investigation. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2023). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

January 9, 2024, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 1, 

2, 4–6, 8–10, 13–15, and 17–19 of the 

’505 patent, and whether an industry in 

the United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337; 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 16, 2024 / Notices 2645 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘one-wheeled, selfbalancing electric skateboards that move 

in response to a rider’s weight 

distribution on the board’’; 

(3) Pursuant to section 210.58 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.58, the motion 

for temporary relief under subsection (e) 

of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

which was filed with the complaint, is 

provisionally accepted and referred to 

the presiding administrative law judge 

for investigation; 

(4) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: 

Future Motion, Inc., 1201 Shaffer Road, 

Santa Cruz, California 95060 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Floatwheel, 5th Tech Rd Industry 

Complex, Building 06 F27 15, Guilin 

City, GuangXi Province 546008, China 

Changzhou Smilo Motors Co., Ltd., 

Guzhuang, Benniu Town, Xinbei 

District, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, 

China 

Changzhou Gaea Technology Co., Ltd., 

Changxin Industrial Park, No. 218, 

Taishan Road, Xinbei District, 

Changzhou, Jiangsu, China 

Shanghai Loyal Industry Co., Ltd., d/b/ 

a ‘‘SoverSky’’, Room 204–192, 500 

Chuansha Road, Shanghai, China 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(5) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 9, 2024. 

Katherine Hiner, 

Supervisory Attorney. 

[FR Doc. 2024–00614 Filed 1–12–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1334] 

Certain Raised Garden Beds and 

Components Thereof; Notice of a 

Commission Determination To Review 

in Part a Final Initial Determination 

Finding a Violation of Section 337; 

Request for Written Submissions on 

Remedy, the Public Interest, and 

Bonding 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has 

determined to review in part a final 

initial determination on violation of 

section 337 (the ‘‘Final ID’’) issued by 

the presiding administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’) finding a violation of section 

337 by reason of misappropriation of 

trade secrets and unfair competition 

based on false advertising under the 

Lanham Act. The Commission requests 

written submissions from the parties, 

interested government agencies, and 

other interested persons on the issues of 

remedy, the public interest, and 

bonding, under the schedule set forth 

below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Edward S. Jou, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3316. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on October 19, 2022, based on an 

amended complaint (the ‘‘Complaint’’) 

filed by Vego Garden, Inc. of Houston, 

Texas (the ‘‘Complainant’’ or ‘‘Vego 

Garden’’). 87 FR 63527–28 (Oct. 19, 

2022). The Complaint alleges violations 

of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based upon 

the importation into the United States, 

and in the sale of, certain raised garden 

beds and components thereof by reason 

of misappropriation of trade secrets and 

unfair competition, the threat or effect 

of which is to destroy or substantially 

injure a domestic industry. Id. at 63527. 

The Commission’s notice of 

investigation named five respondents, 

see id., and the name of one of the 

respondents was corrected pursuant to 

an amended complaint. See 88 FR 

2637–38 (Jan. 17, 2023) (amending 

complaint and notice of investigation). 

The five named respondents, as 

amended, are: Huizhou Green Giant 

Technology Co., Ltd. (‘‘Green Giant’’) of 

Guangdong, China; Utopban 

International Trading Co., Ltd. d/b/a 

Vegega (‘‘Utopban International’’) of 

Rosemead, California; Utopban Limited 

(‘‘Utopban’’) of Hong Kong, China; 

Forever Garden of El Monte, California; 

and VegHerb, LLC d/b/a Frame It All 

(‘‘VegHerb’’) of Cary, North Carolina. 

See id. at 2638. The Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is also a 

party in this investigation. Id. 

The investigation was terminated as 

to Utopban International based on 

withdrawal of the complaint’s 

allegations. Order No. 9 (Jan. 30, 2023), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Feb. 27, 

2023). The investigation was terminated 

as to Forever Garden and VegHerb based 

on settlement agreements. Order No. 11 

(Feb. 23, 2023) (VegHerb) and Order No. 

12 (Feb. 23, 2023) (Forever Garden), 

both unreviewed by Comm’n Notice 

(Mar. 23, 2023). 

An evidentiary hearing was held on 

May 22–25, 2023, and the ALJ issued 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1