alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.12.1



                    SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (hereinafter called
"Amendment") made and entered into as of the 30th day of July, 1997, by and
among IMAGE INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter called the
"Company"), H. STAN PADGETT, a resident of Georgia (hereinafter called
"Employee") and THE MAXIM GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter
called "Maxim").

                              W I T N E S S E T H
                              - - - - - - - - - -

     WHEREAS, Employee and Company entered into an Employment Agreement dated
July 30, 1993, as amended (the "Agreement"), which the parties wish to hereby
amend;

     NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises, the mutual
covenants contained herein and other good and valuable considerations the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do
hereby agree as follows:

     1.   Amendments.  From and after the date hereof, the Agreement is hereby
amended by deleting from Section 6 of the Agreement the words "for a period of
five (5) years thereafter" and substituting in lieu thereof the words "until
July 30, 2000".

     2.   Continued Effect.  Except as hereby amended, the Agreement shall be
unchanged and shall remain in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set forth their hands and
seals, effective as of the date first above written.



                                   /s/ H. Stan Padgett
                                   ----------------------------------------
                                   H. STAN PADGETT



                                   IMAGE INDUSTRIES, INC.


                                   By: /s/ Larry M. Miller
                                      -------------------------------------
                                   Name:   Larry M. Miller
                                        -----------------------------------
                                   Title:  Chairman of the Board
                                         ----------------------------------



                                   THE MAXIM GROUP, INC.


                                   By: /s/ A.J. Nassar
                                      -------------------------------------
                                   Name:   A.J. Nassar
                                        -----------------------------------
                                   Title:  President
                                         ----------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4726 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4726

 To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
  to add Rhode Island to the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 21, 2017

 Mr. Langevin (for himself and Mr. Cicilline) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
  to add Rhode Island to the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rhode Island Fishermen's Fairness 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ADDITION OF RHODE ISLAND TO THE MID-ATLANTIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT 
              COUNCIL.

    Section 302(a)(1)(B) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation 
and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1852(a)(1)(B)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``Rhode Island,'' after ``States of'';
            (2) by inserting ``Rhode Island,'' after ``except North 
        Carolina,'';
            (3) by striking ``21'' and inserting ``23''; and
            (4) by striking ``13'' and inserting ``14''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                               EXHIBIT 10.2.18


     The following lists the material differences between the Percentage Lease
filed as Exhibit 10.2.1 and Exhibit 10.2.18 and is being filed pursuant to
Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               Annual
 Exhibit       Percentage Lease                                                Base            Percentage Rent
 Number           Description                                                  Rent               Formula         
 -------       ----------------                                                ------      -------------------------
 <S>           <C>                                                             <C>         <C>
 10.2.18       Lease Agreement dated as of August 13, 1996 by and between      $270,000    24% of room revenue up to
               Sunstone Hotel Investors, L.P., as lessor, and Sunstone                     $1,125,000, plus 60% of room revenue
               Hotel Properties, Inc., as lessee, for the Days Inn Hotel                   in excess of $1,125,000, plus 5% of
               located in Price, Utah                                                      Food and Beverage Revenue, if any,
                                                                                           plus 100% of sublease and concession
                                                                                           revenue and other net revenues
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4913 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 598
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4913

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 2018

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                           September 28, 2018

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 816 East Salisbury Parkway in Salisbury, Maryland, as the ``Sgt. 
             Maj. Wardell B. Turner Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SGT. MAJ. WARDELL B. TURNER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 816 East Salisbury Parkway in Salisbury, Maryland, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Sgt. Maj. Wardell B. Turner Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sgt. Maj. 
Wardell B. Turner Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 598

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4913

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 816 East Salisbury Parkway in Salisbury, Maryland, as the ``Sgt. 
             Maj. Wardell B. Turner Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 28, 2018

                       Reported without amendment
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1621]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 TAIWAN

                                 ______
                                 

                              HON. TED POE

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. POE of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I rise to recognize an important 
upcoming date--October 10, 2012--which marks more than 100 years since 
the founding of the Republic of China (Taiwan). The United States and 
Taiwan share a common vision of democracy and liberty. It is important 
that we take a moment and recognize the successes of this great friend 
and ally. Often through struggle, Taiwan has used the last 101 years to 
bring peace and prosperity to its people. A beacon of democracy in the 
Asia-Pacific region, President Ma and the people of Taiwan should be 
commended for living in peace and for implementing pro-growth policies 
that have led to economic prosperity. They are a model for the region 
and the world. We are fortunate to call Taiwan a friend and ally.
  I also would like to congratulate Ambassador Jason Yuan, 
Representative of the ROC (Taiwan) to the United States, on his new 
post as Secretary-General of the National Security Council of Taiwan. I 
cherish the friendship with Ambassador Yuan and wish Ambassador and 
Madame Yuan the very best.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

I, Jack R. Lazar, the chief financial officer of Atheros Communications, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,:



|(i) | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2007                      
|                                          
|/s/ Jack R. Lazar                         
|Jack R. Lazar                             
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)
Rec o rd of Di sc u ss io n D ocke t No. FAA- Direct o rate Id e ntifi e r : -AD



### With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e . , Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

O RGAN I ZAT I ON P E R SON CONTACTE D DAT E TOP I CS DISCUSSED 

### Boeing Miles No mura 

### 1111 /2013 Co ncur.

Oth e r / Additional Inf ormat ion:



### 9
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 2, 2015

No. 04-15-00464-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.A.R., A.S.N., C.G.N. AND J.A.G., CHILDREN,

From the 63rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 30,953

Honorable Enrique Fernandez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due on September 28, 2015. Appellant seeks a 30-day 

extension in this appeal from an order terminating appellant’s parental rights. Because this is an 

accelerate appeal, this Court may not grant a 30-day extension of time. 

It is ORDERED the motion is GRANTED in part. Appellant must file the brief on or 

before October 12, 2015. In light of the delay in getting the reporter’s record filed in this case, 

NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE ALLOWED.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of October, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 Certification
of Chairman of the Board and Co - Chief Executive Officer
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2  for the period ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 
 
 Date: May
27, 2005
 
 /s/ Erwin
Haitzmann _________________
 Erwin
Haitzmann
 Chairman
of the Board and Co - Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., or the Company, does hereby certify, to

The Annual Report on form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015, or Form 20-F, of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 15, 2016 |  |  |  | /s/ John Anthony Santa Maria Otazua                    
|                     |  |  |  | John Anthony Santa Maria Otazua
Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  | 
|Date: April 15, 2016 |  |  |  | /s/ Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez                           
|                     |  |  |  | Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6233]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Ms. BROWN of Florida:
       H.R. 6455.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article 1, section 8 of the United States Constitution, 
     this bill is authorized by Congress' power to provide for the 
     common Defense and general Welfare of the United States.
```
The Honorable Elsijane T. Roy, United States District Judge for the Eastern

1

District of Arkansas. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-2651

___________

Paul M. McDonald, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United

States

v. * District Court for the 

* Eastern District of

Arkansas.

St. Louis Southwestern Railroad, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: August 5, 1997

 Filed: August 18,

1997

___________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Paul M. McDonald appeals the district court&s orders 1

granting summary judgment to St. Louis Southwestern

Railroad and denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

60 (b) motion in this employment discrimination action.

After de novo review we conclude the district court&s

grant of summary judgment was correct. See 8th Cir. R.

47B. 
-2-
-3-

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district

court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6232]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. COSTELLO:
       H.R. 6450.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article one
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6000]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. POLIS:
       H.R. 6394.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, section 8, clause 1 (relating to the general 
     welfare of the United States); and Article I, section 8, 
     clause 3 (relating to the power to regulate interstate 
     commerce).
```
#### Wisecarver, Assignee of Hook, *versus*Kincaid *et al.,*Executors of Rinehart.

1. In order to deprive a plaintiff of the benefit of the Statute of Limitations in a case of set-off, the defendant must give notice of his intention to set off his claim before the six years have terminated; otherwise the statute runs till the time the set-óff is given in evidence.

2'. The plea of payment is not of itself such notice of a set-off as will stop the running of the statute, but the defendant must either plead the setioff or give notice of it as special matter.

3. Where, in assumpsit, the defendant pleaded payment, and some months later (on October 6th 1875) added a plea of set-off: *Held,*that the plea of payment did .not stop the running of the Statute of Limitations, but that the statute was a bar to all items of the account offered by the defendant of an earlier date tiran October 6th 1869.

November 15th 1876.

Before Agnew, C. J., Sharswood, Gordon, Paxson and Woodward, JJ. Williams and Merche, JJ., absent.

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of *Greene*county: Of October and November Term 1876, No. 183.

Assumpsit by Kincaid and another, executors of Rinehart, against 'Hook. On May 11th 1875 the defendant pleaded, among other things, payment. Afterwards, on October 6th, he added a plea of set-off. At the trial he offered in evidence under this plea an account of items running from 1860 to 1871. The court below (A. E. Will-son, P. J.) refused to admit items of an earlier date than October 6th 1869, and so charged the jury. After a verdict for the plaintiff, in which a set-off was allowed the defendant for items later than October 6th 1869, and judgment thereon, Wisecarver, who had become the assignee of Hook, took this writ of error, assigning for error the charge of the court.

*J. C. Lazear*and *A. A. Purman,*for the plaintiff in error.—

The defendant below could have given his account in evidence by way of a set-off under the plea of payment, under the Defalcation Act of 1705, and that plea stopped the running of the statute. The plea of set-off was unnecessary: Balsbagh *v.*Frazer, 7 Harr. 551; Calvin *v.*McClure, 17 S. & R. 385; Coulter *v.*Repplier, 3 Harr. 212.

In Gilmore *v.*Reed, 26 P. F. Smith 462, there had been no plea of payment, as here.

*Black, Wyly & Buchanan,*for the defendants in error.

The judgment of this court was entered November 24th 1876,

Per Curiam.

The principles stated in the case of Gilmore *v.*Reed, 26 P. F. Smith 462, rule this case. By the statute a set-off may be given in evidence under the plea of payment merely. But it is not *101a logical conclusion thence that the Statute of Limitations, as affecting the set-off, may be avoided at any period of time after the bringing of the action, at the election of the defendant. In order to deprive the plaintiff of the benefit of the statute, he, defendant, must give notice of his intention to use the set-off, before the six years have terminated, otherwise they run on until the time the set-off is given in evidence. He must therefore either plead the set-off or give notice of it as special matter in due season.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4774 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4774

To prohibit oil and gas leasing on the outer Continental Shelf off the 
                         coast of New England.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2018

 Mr. Cicilline (for himself, Mr. Capuano, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, 
   Ms. DeLauro, Ms. Esty of Connecticut, Mr. Himes, Mr. Keating, Mr. 
   Kennedy, Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire, Mr. Langevin, Mr. Larson of 
   Connecticut, Mr. Lynch, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Moulton, Mr. Neal, Ms. 
  Pingree, Ms. Shea-Porter, Ms. Tsongas, Mr. Welch, and Mr. Poliquin) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit oil and gas leasing on the outer Continental Shelf off the 
                         coast of New England.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New England Coastal Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL 
              SHELF OFF THE COAST OF NEW ENGLAND.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(q) Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in Certain Areas of the 
Outer Continental Shelf.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
section or any other law, the Secretary may not issue a lease for the 
exploration, development, or production of oil or natural gas in any 
area of the outer Continental Shelf off the coast of the State of 
Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, or Connecticut.''.
                                 <all>
```