AGREEHEHT

EXHIBIT

IJ:7EH5i

,.

THIS AGREEMEHT, entered into this -Jq"'" day of January,

1983, by and between the CITY OF SANTA MONICA, a municipal

corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and MESTRE GREVE

ASSOCIATES whose address is 200 Newport Center Drive, Newport

Beach, California, 92660, (hereinafter referren to

"Contractor"), is mane with reference to the following:

R E CIT A L S:

A. The City is a municipal corporation duly organized and

validly existing under the laws of the State of California with

the power to carryon its business as it is now being conducted

under the Statutes of the State of California and the Charter of

the City.

B. Contractor has presented a Proposal to the City for

services to measure, forecast, and analyze aircraft noise

at the Santa Monica Airport (hereinafter referred to as

"Proposal").

C. City ann Contractor desire to enter into an agreement

for performance of services set forth in Proposal upon the terms

and conditions herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the

undersigned parties as follows:

1. TERM AND TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.

1

as
The tern of this Agreement shall commence on the day

. I,

of January, ~983, and shall terminate on the first day of January,

1984, unless terminated earlier as set forth herein.

In the event Contractor hereto fails or refuses to perform

any of the provisions hereof at the time and in the manner

required hereunder, Contractor shall be deemed in default in the

perfornance of this Agreement. If such default is not cured

within a period of seven (7) days after receipt by Contractor from

City of written notice of default, specifying the nature of such

default and the steps necessary to cure such default, City may

terminate the agreenent forthwith by giving to the Contractor

written notice thereof.

Trois Agreement may be terminated by City, without cause,

upon thirty (30) days written notice.

2. SERVI CES TO BE PERFORr1ED BY CONTRACTOR.

Contractor shall perform each and every service set forth in

the Consolidated Scope of Work, which is attached hereto as

Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference.

The total compensation under this Agreement shall not exceed

the sum of Twenty One Thousand Dollars ($21,000).

3. COMPENSATIONS.

Contractor shall be compensated for services performed

pursuant to this Agreement in the amounts and in the manner set

forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. The total compensation

under this agreement shall not exceed Twenty-One Thousand Dollars

(S21,OOO), exclusive of direct non-salary expenses.

2
4. NOTICES.

All ~~tices, demands, requests or approvals to be given

unne~ this Agreement, shall be given in writing and conclusively

shall be dee~ed served when delivered personally or on the second

business day after the deposit thereof in the United States Mail,

postage prepaid, registered, or certified, addressed as

hereinafter provided.

All notices, demands, requests, or approvals frOM Contractor

to City shall be addressed to City at:

3
••

04

Santa r10nica City Hall

1685 Main Street

Santa Monica, California 90401

Attention: City Manager

All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from City to

Contractor. s~all be addressed to Contractor at:

MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES

200 Newport Center Drive

Newport Beach, California 92660

5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.

Both parties hereto in the performance of this Agreement

will be acting in an independent capacity and not as agents,

employees, partners, or joint venturers of one another.

Neither the City nor its officers or employees shall have

any control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's

e~?loyees, except as herein set forth.

6. INTEGRA~ED CONTRACTS.

This Agreement represents the full and complete

understanding of every kind of nature whatsoever between the

parties hereto and all preliminary negotiations and agreements of

whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal agreement

or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions hereof.

Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only by

written execution signed by both City and Contractor.

7. COS~ OF LITIGATION.

4
If any legal action is necessary to enforce any provision

hereof or "for danages by reason of an alleged breach of any

provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be

entitled to receive from the losing party all costs and expenses

and such anount as the court may adjudge to be reasonable

attorneys' fees for the costs incurren by the prevailing party in

such action or proceeding.

13.

Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless

servants, boards and commissions, officers, agen , and

against any and all loss, damages,

claims, costs and expenses, including

reasonable fees, regardless of or outcome of

any such claim or to

the services or work cond Agreement.

Contractor shall and save harmless the

City, its Council, and commissions, officers,

agents and employees from all claims and

losses whatsoever, includi fees, accruing

or resulting to all persons, or corporations

furnishing or work, services, equipment or

supplies in with services or or

performed to this Agreement and of such

work, and from any and all claims

including reasonable attorneys' fees,

any person, firm or corporation for damage, injury

death arising out of Contractor's operations.

5
9. PROHIBITION AGAINST TRANSFER.

Con tr'actor' shall not assign, sublease, hypothecate, or

01

transfer this Agreement or any interest therein directly or

indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise without the prior

written consent of the City; any attempt to do so without said

consent shall be null and void, and any assignee, sublessee,

hypothecate or transferee shall acquire no right or interest by

reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any

of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Contractor, or of

the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate

member or cotenant if Contractor if a partnership or joint

venturer or syndicate or cotenancy, which shall result in changing

the control of Contractor, shall be construed as an assignment of

this Agreement. Control means fifty (50) percent or more of the

voting power of the corporation.

10. cnUNTERPARTS.

This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each

of which is an original, and all of which together constitute one

and the same document.

11. PERMITS AND LICENSES.

Contractor shall obtain and maintain during the ter~ of this

agreement, all appropriate licenses, permits, and certificates

that may be required in connection with the provision of services

hereunder.

6
I· ••

Such licenses, permits, and certificates shall be obtained

without add1tional expense to the City •

••

12. KAIVERS.

A waiver by the City or any breach of any term, covenant, or

co~dition contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of

any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or

condition contained herein whether of the same or a different

character.

7
HJ WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement

"

to be executen the day and year first above written.

~

APPROVED AS TO FOR~:

CITY OF SANTA MOnICA,

a municipal corporation

CONTRACTOR:

8
CONSOLIDATED SCOPE OF WORK

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

CNEl CONTOURS AND NOISE ORDINANCE PROPOSALS

MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES

,

~

TASK 1.0 NOISE MEASUREMENTS

Noise measurements will be made in the immediate community around Santa

Monica Airport. These measurements will consist of noise measurements

designed for the calibration of the INM computer program for generating noise

contours around airports. A representative sample of aircraft flyover noise

data will be collected at 4 locations. These data will consist of the

maximum noise level, Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEl), time of day,

aircraft type, and description of flight path. All measurements will be made

with a Digital Acoustics Portable Noise Monitor calibrated with a certified

sound level calibrator. Five work days have been allocated for this task.

In addition, two 24 hour CNEl measurements will be made in the community.

TASK 2.0 DEVELOP CNEl CONTOURS

Task 2.1 .:. Define Base Case Operational Conditions. Prior to

conducting the noise assessment, the base case operational

conditions to which all potenttal alternatives will be compared

to, must be defined. In conjunction with the City staff, airport

manager, and consulting team, the base case operational conditions

will be defined and all pertinent data collected. This will

specify the conditions that exist at the airport today, or planned

for some other specified time for which the City would like to

compare alternatives. The definition of the base case conditions

must be directed by City staff. Operational data that will be

collected include:

- total number of operations

- aircraft mix

-. fl ight tracks

- day/evening/night split of operations

- noise abatement procedures

- airport operational limits for aircraft

specific flight profiles

Task 2.2 Model Base Case Condition The operational

assumptions defined in Task 1 will be computer modeled to

determi ne the CNEl noi se contours for base case condit ions. The

computer modeling will utilize the Federal Aviation

Administration's (FAA) latest version (3.0) of the Integrated

Noise Model (INM). Noise measurement data, if available for Santa

Monica Airport, will be incorporated into the modeling effort for

calibration and validation of the noise input data. This will be

accomplished in order to increase the accuracy and confidence

level of the noise contours. The product of this task will be

noise contours for 65,60,55 and 50 CNEL noise level.

-1- 1/17/83
Task 2.3 ~ Develop Alternative Operational Scenarios In this

task, various operational alternative scenarios for the airport

liwill be developed. The noise contours generated for base case

cenditions and the City's various land use plans for the airport

environs will play an integral role in the selection of the

alternatives. City staff will be included in the process of

developing the alternatives while coordinating with the Master

Planning process. Up to nine scenarios will be defined for

analysis. They may include:

- variations total number of operations

- aircraft mix modifications

- day/evening/night distribution

- flight track modifications

- increased grade on approach

- runway threshold

- airport restrictions

- specific noise abatement procedures

Task 2.4 - Model Alternative Scenarios In this task the

alternatives developed in Task 3 will be computer modeled to

determine the CNEl noise contours for each of these alternatives.

Noise contours will be generated for the 65, 60. 55 and 50 (if 50

CNEl is technically feasible to define) CNEl noise level for each

alternative. The effect of the scenario on the noise environment

will be quantified in terms of acres of land within each contour.

Task 2.5 - Select and Model an Optimum Alternative Based upon

me- tne- analysis of~he prevTOus tasks, an operational scenario

that presents the optimum picture will be defined and modeled.

City staff will make the selection of the final alternative to be

modeled here. This scenario will in all probability derived from

combining one or more of the alternatives analyzed previously.

This scenario will represent the noise environment that will exist

given the land use constraints and the goals and policies of the

City of Santa Monica.

Task 2.6 ~ Prepare Report The report will contain a description

of operational assumptions, modeling methodology and a discussion

of the effect of each alternative on the noise environment.

TASK 3.0 DRAFT NOISE ORDINANCE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

Information developed from the CNEl contours. work done for the City of Santa

Monica by Dr. Karl Kryter C'Guidel ines for the Assessment of the Impacts of ~'5:> I-I"I-~~:::

;1·J'?-s3 Aircraft and Street Traffic Noise in Residential Areas," September 15, 1982),ftV\,\\~';),D

,\d~e().Federal Publications, and other sources will be used to develop a new noise

·--7'ordinance for the airport. We will provide technical assistance in the

development and drafting of this ordinance including evaluating the impacts

-2- 1/17/83
/

of the ordinance and implementation of the ordinance. While we cannot

provide any legal assistance, the noise ordinance must be based on

technically complete and accurate concepts.

" TASK 4.0 EHVIRONMENTAl DOCUMENTATION

The adoption of a revised noise ordinance for the City of Santa Monica will

require environmental review by the City. 'For the purposes of this proposal

it has been assumed that an EIR will be prepared for this action. Mestre

Greve Associates will prepare the necessary EIR and assist the City in

meeting the processing requirements of CEQA. As per the requirements of CEQA

it has been assumed that this will be "tccused EIRII which will address the

impacts of the noise ordinance on noise and the aviation system. Economic

impact analysis is beyond our capabilities and is not included in this

proposal.

TASK 5.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS

Mestre Greve Associates will provide support at public hearings on the noise

ordinance and environmental documentation. The following number of public

hearings have been budgeted:

Noise Ordinance:

Airport Commission - 2

City Council - 2 ..~,

EIR:

City Council - 1

Additional hearings will be billed to the City at the hourly

rate of $40/hour.

-3- , 11 '7 Is:t~
" .

COST

Costs for the work proposed here has been estimated assuming close

coordination between City staff and ourselves. We have also budgeted time

for outsi~e consultants to assist 1n meeting CEQA requirements and to analyze

aviation sy~tem impacts. The costs are detailed below.

ITEM COST

-------------------------------------- Noise Measurments $3200

Develop CNEl Contours $7800

Ordinance Technical Assistance $2000

Environmental Impact Report $5000

Public Hearings $1600

Supplies and Materials

$19600

$ 500

Subtotal:

Total: $20100

TIME SCHEDULE

The time schedule for completion of this program is dependent on the

completion of certain tasks of the Master Plan as well as coordination with

the City Attorney's office. Based on the schedule for the Master Plan. the

following schedule 1s proposed:

TASK COMPLETION DATE

. 1.0

2.1,

2.3,

2.5,

Noise Measurements February 15

2.2 Existing Contours March 31 (see note 1)

2.4 Alternative Contours April 30

2.6 Final Contour, Report 2 weeks after selection of Master Plan

Concept alternative

August 1 } Est imated, schedul e to be coordi nated

Sept ember 1 City Attorney and Master Plan St udy.

=~----------------

3.0 Draft Noise Ordinance

4.0 EIR

with

TERMS

All work done under this program will be billed to the City of santa

Monica on a monthly basis for work completed during the month. Invoices will

identify work completed for which billing has been submitted. Terms for

payment are 30 days net.
AGREEMENT

,,

THIS iGREEMENT, entered into this

Ie":'

. ,I day of January,

1983, by and between the CITY OF SANTA MONICA, a municipal

corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and CH2M HILL

CALIFORNIA, INC., whose address is 1301 Dove Street, Newport

Reach, California, 92660, (hereinafter referred to as

"Contractor"), is mane with reference to the following:

R E CIT A L S:

A. The City is a municipal corporation duly organized and

validly existing under the laws of the State of California with

the power to carryon its business as it is now being conducted

under the Statutes of the State of California and the Charter of

the City.

B. Contractor has presented a Proposal to the City for

services to prepare a master plan for the Santa Monica Airport

(hereinafter referred to as "Proposal").

C. City and Contractor desire to enter into an agreement

for performance of services set forth in Proposal upon the terms

and conditions herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the

undersigned parties as follows:

1. TERM AND TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.

The term of this I

~

Agreement shall commence on the -/ day

of January, 1983, and shall terminate on the first day of January,

1
1984, unless terninate~ earlier as set forth herein, or extended

by written ~utual agreement •

••

This Agreement may be terminated by either party by seven

(7) days written notice in the event of substantial failure to

p~rfor~ in accordance with the terms hereof by one party through

no fault of the other party. If terminated when a Task Order or

portion thereof is in effect due to the fault of others than the

Contractor, the Contractor shall he paid for services performed to

the date of termination, including reimbursements then due, plus

termi nal expense as establ ished in each Task Order agreement. If

no Task Orner is in effect at the time of such termination, then

no termination expense shall apply. If ~he termination is nue to

the fault of the Contractor, the City is not ohligaten to pay any

fees or ex~enses set forth in Paraqraph 3 hereof which

specifically involve the item of fault.

This Agreement may be terminated by City, without cause,

upon thirty (30) days written notice. In this event, termination

expenses shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of the

preceding paragraph.

2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORHED BY COfJTRACTOR.

Contractor shall perforM each ann every service which it is

requested to perform by written Task Order as given to it by the

City. Each Task Order or portion thereof shall outline the scope

of services to be performed, delineate any special conditions,

state the amount of fee authorized, describe the fee basis, state

the time of completion, and outline the output requested. Upon

2
executLor; o~ each Task Order or portion thereof, it sha 11 he

in=o~porate~,herein by this reference .

•• Contractor shall hegin the work for services lister. in the

':"as}: On3er(s) ir.L"1e~iatelyupon receipt of a written Notice to

Procee~ issue"l ry the City.

I~ is understoo~ that Contractor is under contract to the

Cit.y projects involving the Santa Monica Airport ann

shall n~t accept any work or assignnents from any tenant on t~e

Sa:-;~c:; ~;or.ica~.irport f.uring the tern of this Agreenent_.

3. CO!:re'SATIm,s.

ContT~ctor shall be compensate, for services perforMe~

purs~ant t~ this Agreement on the basis ~escrihec1 in each Tas~

Order. 7~e total conpensation unner this contract shall not

excee~ t~e ~u~ of Fifty-Six Thousan~ Three Hundre~ Dollars

($56,38C), exclusive of f.irect non-salary expenses oS nefine~

herein.

A. For a~visory anr. planning services, the City shall pay

the C~ntractor a lunp sum fee, or a fee in accoraance ~ith

Sche:4ule A, attached, which is the Employee Classification and

Rate Schec1ule which will he revisen on an annual basis and

providej to City accordingly, ann direct non-salary expenses at

actual cost, as estahlishea for each project.

B. For engineering services, the City shall pay the

Contractor a fee as prescribed in the American Society of Civi1

Engineers r-1anualNo , 45 "A Gui de for the Engagement of Engineering

Services", unless the City ana Contractor mutually agree upon

another fee hasis.

3
..

C. Any amount over the estimated cost of services as set

forth in a Task Order or project or work beyond the scope of each

.\

project will be negotiated and agreed upon between the Contractor

and the City in writing and a separate Task Order attachment

prepared prior to the beginning of actual work.

D. The Contractor's direct non-salary expenses are defined

as the costs incurred on or directly for the project, other than

payroll costs. Such direct non-salary expenses shall be computed

on the basis of actual purchase for items obtained from commercial

sources and on the basis of usual commercial charges for items

provided by the Contractor. Direct non-salary expenses shall

includ~, but not be limited to, necessary transportation costs,

meals and lodging; laboratory tests and analyses: computer

services; magnetic card typewriter service; telephone; postage:

shipping; printing; hinding; and ~ultilith charges.

~. The City shall pay for the services performed by the

Contractor as the work progresses, based upon work completed.

Invoices shall be submitted by the 10th of each calendar month by

Contractor. Payment shall be due and payable within 30 days after

receipt.

F. No deduction shall be made from the Contractor's fee on

account of penalty, liquidated damages, or other sums withheld

from payment to any other party.

4. NOTICES.

All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given

under this Agreement, shall be given in writing and conclusively

shall be deemed served when delivered personally or on the second

4
business day after the deposit thereof in the United States Mail,

postage p~epaid, registered,

hereinafter provided.

All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from Contractor

or certified, addressed as

to City shall be addressed to City at:

5
Santa Monica City Hall

,~ 1685 Main Street

Santa Monica, California 90401

Attention: City Manager

All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from City to

Contra~tor s~al1 be annressed to Contractor at:

CH2M HILL

1301 Dove Street

Newport Beach, California 92660

5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.

Both parties hereto in the performance of this Agreement

will he acting in an in~ependent capacity and not as agents,

employees, partners, or joint venturers of one another.

Neither the City nor its officers or employees shall have

any control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's

employees, except as herein set forth.

no permitted or required approval by the City of personnel,

costs, scheaules, documents or services of the Contractor shall be

construed as making the City responsible for the manner in which

the Contractor performs its services or for any negligence, errors

or omissions of the Contractor. Such approvals are intended only

to give the City the right to satisfy itself with the quality of

work performed by the Contractor.

6. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES

The Contractor's services will be

generally accepted professional

furnished in accordance

with engineering practice and

6
principles and technical standards. The Contractor makes no other

warranty ei~her expressed or implied.

7. INTEGRATED CONTRACT.

This Agreement represents the full and complete

understanding of every kind of nature whatsoever between the

parties hereto and all preliminary negotiations and agreements of

whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal agreement

or i~pliea covenant shall be held to vary the provisions hereof.

Any Mo~ification of this Agreement will be effective only by

written execution signed by both City and Contractor~

8. COS~ OF LITIGATION.

If any legal action is necessary to enforce any provision

hereof or for danages by reason of an alleged breach of any

provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be

entitled to receive from the losing party all costs and expenses

and such amount as the court may adjudge to be reasonable

attorneys' fees for the costs incurred by the prevailing party in

such action or proceeding. ~ _.

~ - ;.j 'C_"

9. HOLD HAR~1LESS.

Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its

.... -r" ../

Council, servant~ boards and commissigns, officers, agents~ and

employees from and ~gainst any and~ loss, damages, liability,

", ~

-, .~

claims, suits, costs '·,.and ..• expenses, whatsoever, including

<,

reasonable attorneys'-~ees, regardless of the merit or outcome of

<,

any such claim -or suit, arising fr~ .... or in any manner connected to

the services or work conducted pursuant~to, this Agreement.

7
/

Contractor shall indemnify, defend and save harmless the

City, its '\Council, servants, boards and commissions, officers,

~

agent5 ann employees from ann against any and all claims and

lOS5e~ whatsoever, including reasonable attorneys' fees, accruing

or resulting to any and all persons, firms or corporations

furnishing or supplying work, services, materials, equipment or

supplies in connection with services or work conducted or

perfornea pursuant to this Agreement and arising out of such

activities or work, and from any and all claims and losses

whatsoever, including reasonable attorneys' fees, accruing or

resulting to any person, firm or corporation for damage, injury or

death arising out of Contractor's operations.

10. PROHIBITION AGAINST TRANSFER.

Contractor shall not assign, sublease, hypothecate, or

transfer this Agreement or any interest therein directly or

indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise without the prior

written consent of the City; any attempt to do so without said

consent ~hall be null and void, and any assignee, sublessee,

hypothecate or transferee shall acquire no right or interest by

reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any

of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Contractor, or of

the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate

member or cotenant if Contractor if a partnership or joint

venturer or syndicate or cotenancy, which shall result in changing

the control of Contractor, shall be construed as an assignment of

8
this Agreement. Control means fifty (50) percent or more of the

voting power of the corporation.

,\

•• It is understood by the City and the Contractor that the FAA

or other state or Federal agencies are not a party to this

Agreement and will not be responsible for associated costs except

as should be agreed upon by the City and the agency under a grant

agreement.

11. COur;':'ERPARTS.

This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each

of which is an original, and all of which together constitute one

an~ the same document.

12. PER~nTS AND LICENSES.

Contractor shall obtain and maintain during the term of this

agreement, all appropriate licenses, permits, and certificates

that may be required for the provision of services hereunder.

Such licenses, permits, and certificates shall be obtained

without additional expense to the City.

13. WAIVERS.

A waiver by either party of any breach of any term,

covenant, or condition contained herein shall not be deemed to be

a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term,

covenant, or condition contained herein whether of the same or a

different character.

9
ITJ WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement

to be execu~ed the day and year first above written.

"

CITY OF SANTA MONICA,

a municipal corporation

APPROVED AS TO FOR~l:

A

/; .

A ~, ....-v /.' /'

// - /'? . .: / ./-" ,/

By,-i~/-

I

~c;;:.N~ ALSCHULER, JR.

I / ty Manager

iL'"

ROBER? ~j. MYERS

City Attorney

conTRACTOR:

10
~ASK ORDER no. 1

SCQP!: OF SFRVICr:S

II

'"'}-,' •'.•1 S Tas~: 1 to the Professio~al Services Agree~~~t

, 19E2, between the City of Santa Monica,

--------

!:c •

c~":ed

here ina fter c a lIEd'. CLIEn,:" ar.c. CP.2~1HIL:"

CI I!:C., he r e Lna ft e r called COI:SUI::')I.r,:, •

- --O~,·_" .••.•.~ ..•..;- _ ;-\~ ~.l. /'1 ,

t~;.:::?::;·.~,the CL!I:!:':' CE'sires to use the se rv ice s of the CO:~-

in ccr.necticn with the preparation o~ a

\"'::'C't=E" (:~ t:':: co~~s:·:::';\.~~':' as per Sectio;; ~~, A:-ticle 2 cf tl)c:

Ac;::."r.:e!""?il t f or the fo :!.lm:i!".g r>roj ect .

!~o~: '.:':::::i\T:?Or:r:, that in con side r a t Lon of the r'utu:.l cove ne nts

E~~ Acreernents herein containe~, the pn.rties ~o rnutual1~'

ao r s c c~ folloh'S:

acc~rt~ a~c a~rees to perform the elements of this PP.O~EC'.:'.

B. SCOP[ 0: \x'p.r

c~-,r!:!7':' desires to have a master plan of the Santa 110nica

Air~0:--t pr epe r ed by COI~St:L':::'ANT, and to have CONStJL7ArJ'.:'

c cnduc t r(?C'!u~ar \'lQ:(king rne:.~ting~ during the course of the

study fa::- 't!-:e benefit of CLIE!i':' C\nd its invitees, arid to

cancuct three (3) public Meetings for the benefit of the

ge~eral public for this stUdy.
7hjs ~as~~r plan stud" is to follow the suggested outline

:C~ me st er plans as ~i'"e'1 in Advisor:' Cd r cu lz r 150/5070-6,

\;i~.~~ a spe cif Lc ou t Line aE; given be1e v•• I,

••

PHA~:r 'T' - ,\":P.PO:R':' p.:S0.t·:p:::!~r:!·':'f:

':'....c s Ph ase 0: :.hf> studv i!='cor.c erned \-:ith the co1-

lectio~ 0: r.atn, th~ preparation of. forec2sts, co~pnriS0~ ~~ the forecasts with th~ existin~ capacity, ar.~

.~~ ~i~~u~sion o~ the role of. the Airport with the con-

(:c-.t::: c-?'"elo;::-c( in t.h is Pha se , Exis"::ir.9d at.a, c:rcwinos

2~~ reports will be used to the fullest e~t~nt

p0ssible.

F.i~tcrica1, curre~t, anc forecast statistics will be

~~~~ere~ e~ n~iatior datc:, socioeconomic statistics and

0t~er rele~a~t su~jects necessary to establish P

fcc::'",cationfor fcrecastLnc aviatior: ect iv.it v ,

In:or~ation, data, and drawings on the ph~sical aspects

o~ th~ Airport ~iJl be gathered, inc1udin~ propertv

lines, Leese lines, utiLities, easements, and the phy s>

ical fentures of thf' field. Data pertaining to soil

corditions and drainage will be gatheref for use in

making cost estimates for improvements. Information,

dctc, and dra~ings will be gathered on surrounding land

uses including land use, zoning, and general environmental considerations. Data on noise contours are

being developed by others, but will be incorporated

into the data base for this study.
:n a~dition, data will be assembled on property owners~ip, gra~t agree~ents, lease agreeme~ts, City rules

a~( r~~ulatio~s that a::ect the Airport, court ru:~n~s,

and. " ot:-'f";!" r-eCJulator~'or contractual ob liqations .

FC'Y(:castS 0: aviatiori ac'tivit.v at Santa l~o:li ca p.i rpo.r t

~ill be ~Eveloped fer the years 1987, 199:, 20C2, and

:~15. 7he in~ividual ite~s to be in('Juded in the foreo ~ircraft Operations, ir.cludin~ Local and

Itinerar.t Opera'tions

o Instru~ent Operations

C! 11:;.:: 0: the Ba sed Air-craft Fleet

!~ t~c event that the role of the Airport is to includ~

COT'1!"':l1~E:r opera":ions, the" an estir'latewill be made 0:

thE- potentia 1 Jeve1 0: activi ty for these operations,

inclufing: nunber of operations, number of passengers,

an~ type of aircra~t. These forecasts will be for

unconstrained growth. Unconstrained forecasts also

serve to point out the existence of any need to

constr-ain growth so that the Airport does not adversely

impact the environment or grow beyond the capacity of

the field nor compromise safe operational factors.

Where constraints are introduced into forecasts, the

resultant forecasts will be given.
The fr~cr.asts developed in Task 2 will he trar.slntee

. ,\ . .

l~t~ ca~Rclty rC~Ulrene~ts for the keY elerne~ts o~ the

~Rsig~. These will thE~ be cc~pare~ with thp existing

c~p?~ity o~ the 2ir~ort nne a~y short~alls or ove~ages

':ill he noted. For the Santa Monica Airport, the key

open; ti ons V t:" -. r unway capacity

2\'ailalJJc

If approp~iate: comr..uterpassengers vs. terninal space available and cor.tTTJuter passengerF.

vs. auto parking space_available

'.:'he t.heoret IcaI capacity 0: the runway sy sten ,.,i11 be

calcul;:;tcGusing the Fk; guidelines and planning

nanuale an~ will be Axpressed in terms of pea~ hour

c~~~city a~c annual capacity.

To> ~~. 4 - Fac iIitv Rcouirer'ent Deternina tion

The cc~parison c: the constrained demand ,~~. existing

cap~cities a~ the Airport will serve to identify the

short~A!ls OY overages that nay exist. In this Task a

listjn~ will be developed showing the facility requireme~ts which will be incorporated into the actual field

pla~ning. Included in this listing will be these elernents:

o Runway length and width
o Runway lighting and light aids

o Navigational aids

••

o Taxiway width(s) applicable to this design

o Number of tie downs required, based on aircraft mix

o Number of T-hangars required

o Number of maintenance hangars

o Number of FBO leaseholds to accommodate

demand

o Size of clear zones'

o If appropriate: size of commuter terminal

and number of commuter parking spaces needed ~

At this point, it is recommended that the first general

public meeting be held to present to the public the data

gathere d, the forecasts that have been made. Public

comments will be noted.

Up to this point, the role of the Airport will have been the

subject of informal discussions in the working meetings and

with City staff. The role of the Airport should be

formalized at this point. The environmental assessment, and

the actual planning of the Airport will be affected by this
decision, hence the importance of finalizing this element

before proceeding with the alternatives.

I' 04

Task 5 - Environmental Study

This task will utilize the noise contours developed by

others. These contours, representing levels of noise

annoyance for the expected aircraft mix and number of

operations, will be used to assess the impact of

operations, will be used to assess the impact of

aviation activities upon the Airport and surrounding

areas. From this ana~ysis, various mitigation measures

can be suggested which may influence the design or the

operation of the Airport.

Based upon a preliminary assessment of the development

alternatives, it is not expected that significant

adverse impacts will be realized; however, should some

negative or adverse impacts be identified during this

task, the task will identify and recomnend appropriate

research and analysis to be undertaken in order to prepare an EIR/EIS. This master plan study does not

contemplate the preparation of a full EIR/EIS, nor has

one been included in the budget.

Task 6 - Concept Alternatives

Based upon the information and data that has been developed in prior tasks, plus an assessment of the comments

from the first public meeting, a design concept for the

airport will be prepared. This conceptual drawing will

not be prepared to the detail of an Airport Layout Plan,

but will have sufficient detail to adequately develop the

ideas and concepts for the various facilities and types

of aircraft to be accommodated.

Following the second public meeting a revised conceptual

drawing will be prepared. Upon approval of this concept,

the study will proceed to the next tasks.
f02. J C' 'inC]the cornoletion of Task 6, it is recommended that

~~~ saco~{ p~hlic rnee~i~g be held to present the ,-arious

r0~cep~ alternA~ives to the public an~ obtain their reMarks

t' a;>r cor..,ents.

t

\..·

ni s in th~ s~u~~', th~ s8canc major ~eriEion must

h,.. J ,_ ~a~e resarding w~i~h o~ the concept alternatives is to be

2~0n~e~. AJ,thouc~ nc n~~'conc~pt drawin~s will be rna~~, tte

n: the concepts can be incorporatec

': .. "'-- .. : -.

~hiE chase 0: a Mester planning stud~' iF concer~e~ wit~

the rrorer selectien 0: a site for a new airrort. It

if'not appr opriate for this s~~c:- a!1~ hAE not been

i~cludeQ in the scope of w~rk.

F~~sp III hegins the sec~nd part c: the Moster plan

s~ucy. In th~~ phase the material prepared in P~cse I

will be documented in report forMat, the official

2irp~Tt plAn~ will be drawn, and the economics of

i~r~e~entins the pla~ will be determined. The draV'ings

pre?ar0.c in this pha~e will be based on an approved or

ade~~ed design from Task 6 "Concept Alternatiues."

Task 7 - Airc0rt . Lavout Plan Se~

The o~ficial Airport Layout Plan for the Santa Honica

Airport will be prepared on a suitable base drawing or

map to a scale that allows thp maximum amount of detail

to be shown.
Alsc inclu~e~ in the set will be the rlr~wings listed in

~u~se~ue~t tas~s. The Airport Layout Plan will shot'

curre~~ a~~ phase~ ~evelopment, a~ well as such features

.~

as:

04

o R:.:n\lC",', tax iwav s, apron s, fieLd lig~ting,

ex tende d r unway safety areas, clear zones,

n~vinational aid~, field marking, buildings,

roads, pa~king lots, fences, maior drainage

~a~i!ities, segmented cir~le, wind indicat0rs, airport beacon, etc.

ditches, stee~ slop~s, D0wer lines, towers,

etc. )

o Areas reserve~ fer present a~d futu~e

aviation develop~ent

~ rUElin? fccilitie~ anc bulk storaqe areas

c Aircra:-t storage a~eas and ha~gars

o Airport D0undaries, City boundaries, etc.

o Azimuth of runwav and north po int.s \:1th mag-

+- . • +-' !"'1'?_lC varla_~on

o Pertinent dimensional data, including clearance~ ?r.d limitation lines.
The La~~ Cse Plan will provide guidan~e for the utili-

,I

zation o~ lanf w~thin the preRe~t boun~~rieE o~ the

Airport. Thns~ ro~tio~s not re~uired for a~iatio~

usage "ill be identified, and those portions on the

ulti~Ate Airport will be subdivided into appror~iate

cla~si~ic?tions, such as:

Aircr~~t Operat,ional Area

o ";'·':2t:'on C07'J".ercial

Aviation noncor.'lr::ercial, ana such other are2E

('IS appropriate

Th0~~ Do~tiQn~ o! the Airport not required for ~viation

purposes \-:i17 have the restrictions or liT:1itations

identi~':~f w~ic~ will keep the property co~patihle with

t~e AirrG~~ o~e~~tio~~. ~hese restrictions or linit~-

ticns will be i~ a~~ition to those prepared in T~sk 10.

This t~sk provides the same inforMation as the "Terminal Area Plan" listed in the Advisory Circular. The

~rawing is an enlarger.'lentof the tie down areas, the

FDO areas, r.angar arens, and such facilities as r.'light

lie within these area~. This drawing provides greater

detail of these areas and usually provides more dimensional data than are pcssible to show on the Airport

Layout Plan.
~ask 10 - Hp-iqht Li~it Plan

?hi s r.r;:n,inc;is provideci in Iieu of the Ai:-p0rt Acces s

pi~n called for in the Advisory Circular. The Airport

•• Acces~ Plar sinplv shows the various routes an~ streets

provid.ino access tc the Ai rpor t , ~his date? 'vJiIIh;::

incorporatea into tr,E'Airport: Layout Plan.

The Height Limi t Plan shows the FAR Part 7: .irnacLn ar-:

sur~aces sup~:-inp~~e~ over a vici~ity map. These

fur:aces include::

o Transitional Surf~ces

o Approach Surfaces

G Horizontal Surface

o Conical Surfacp-s

r~ch 0: these ~a!" its ow~ ur.ique slope and controls the

hei9~t tc ~hich object~ nav bs huilt without irnparing

t~p op~ratia~al safety of the Airport. It is this

~Tawins ~hich i~ frequentlv incorporated intc rnunicipaJ

crdinancp-s governing the height of structures in the

vicin~t" of the airport.

~~iE part of the master plan provides inforMation

essential to the inple~entation of the plan. Data on

the phasing of improvements, the revenu~ and expenses

that can be expected, the capital improvement costs,

etc., are developed. Recommendations on the various

rates, fees, and charges will be prepared, and various

finapcing rnethoc.swill be discussed.
:ask 11 - Sch~~ule o~ ProDosed D~veloorne~t

?hir t?sk ~ill pre~are a schedule showing the aD~=oximatEI' yea!" i:1wh ich ve riou s .impr overnerrts shou ld b~ conpleted. T~~~ sche~vlc ~ill take into consi~P!"~ti0:1 the

t~=C')'etvear 0: :;(,15 a:1C aLlow sufficierrt tine to

r easonabLy arior t ize an" Lnve strnerrts made en t!-:e

l,j r pcr t .

~~r v~ri0u~ i~provG~e~ts conte~plated for the Santa

!;c~:'::':-r-. Airpo:-t \;iJl he eva Luated , and

orGpr-o:-magnituce cost estimates will be mac~. 7h€sEcost esti~ates will be focused on the a~i~ti0~ portion

o~ the property, si~ce the ultiMate developMent and

costs ?,s!"ociatec.":ith improvement o~ the nonav Iat ior,

~!"~n~rty will be thp responsibility 0: the

o:-cf.:.izr:!tioc: (s) unde rtat. ine that c1e':elopT:1ent.1,11 cost

P.~·::'!'la-:.es ,\'i:~ be in terr;s 0:: 1983 doLlare ,

?h~s tas~ has b~en su~~i"ided into three eleMe~ts.

Elener.~ 1. Rate Structure Methodology. There are

!"everal ways to establish the various rates, fees,

ane cha!"ges on an airport. These will be discussed and a recommendation made on the

methodology which seems most appropriate for Santa

Monica Airport. To SOMe degree, this delves into

the philosophy behind certain methodologies and

why t.hey mayor may not be appropriate for this

situation.
r~e~e~t 2. Estinate Revenues. An estimate will

be mc~~ 0: all the revenu~s that can be generated

o~ the aviation part of the field. This

I' ~ necessaril~ rentlires that the variou~ rates, fees,

a~~ charges at other Southern Cal~fornia air~0rts

h~ a5semble( ~or cornp~rative purposes, and

B?propriate rates, fees, and charges established

~0T Santa Monica Airp0rt. Revenues fro~ other

(nonaviation) sources will be estimated based on

t~0 best data available. Where contractR or

c~Tee~e~ts establish rates, fees, or chars,-;.into

tte future, thesA wi:: be used under the

n~sur~tion ttet no chang~~ will be negotiRte~.

Ele~ent 3. Estimate Costs. The cost to operat~

ane maintain the airport \lill be estimated. These

costs will he base0 on historical eata, or hest

estimates fro~ comparable f2cilities, if necesA!tpr all the estin~tes ha~e been made, the net result

~i:l be given in tabular form so that the City will

ha~e a lO-"ear projection available.

7his task will discuss the various ways that the

i~~rovements to the Airport can be financed. AMong

those that are typically considered are:

o Federel aid

o State aid

o Airport-generated revenues

o Loans from the City

o Development by private enterprise
rp~n co~~lction of the last tasks, the final report will b~

prer~~ed in draft for~. It is typical at this point that

th~ th~rc, and finnl, public neeting be heIr. to present the

co~r!e~e Airoort develornent progra~ to the public. Co~-

~en~s c~fered bv t~0 nuhlic which are felt to ~ave S0~0

~~rit, or could im~0c~ o~ the oDer?tion 0: the Airport, are

t"~ic~ll\' Lnc Lude d in an ac:denduT:"or appendix to the report

S0 tha,: thp." can be considered when detailer engineering or

arc~itectur?l ~ork is undertaken.

':"':;:'s S'::r:"T"'" 0: l}crr: ~o:!.loh·sthe outline established by t.hrFiJ:. ':'r:(' :ssu~s a:-,c corice rns di scussed in the narrative

"E:or>:: 0: \;orr:"preser-t cc' tel the City Council on

Decer.,:;'2~- 1~, 1982, \-:illbe add ressed in this stuc:: program.

And tc that end, the "Scope of Work" is incorporated into

ttis Task Or~er bv referc:,ce.

t.c r':0::' t:-I':'S project \·.-i1: corrnerice after hoth parties have

siqnc~ th~s Task Or~~r No. I aT"c shall procee~ for about

~in~ (S) ~onths nt ~hich ti~c the drawings ane letter

re~nrts shall be delivered to the CLIENT~ unless it is

nutu=l~y eqreed that the tine of ccmpletion shall be

~h~ f:'r~t public neeting, following Tasy. 4, shall be held

prior to ray 1, 1983. The second public meeting, following

C1.1 Lfl-lL~f- ISTask 6, shall be held prior to JUIY ~, 1983. The third

public meEtina, fol1o~ina Task 14, shall be held prior to

~, 1~83. In th; event circumstances beyond control

of CONSULTAIJT indicate that one or more of these meeting

dates cannot be met, Cm;SULTA!JT shall request, in writing, a
revised date for the n~eting(s) and shall indicate why the

reGUGst i£ ne:cessar\'.

D.

The F~~ for this p~o~ect shall be a time anc materials fee

with a n0t-to-excee~ linit in accordance with Article 2,

Sectio:1 p.. of the AGREE~':!:!~'::'. ';he labor rates shall he the

currerrt Lebo r r et es published by CONSVL':'Af·J';, and the total

~e0 ~0~ this PRO~~C7 shall not exceed 560,000 unless it is

~ut~~ll~' ~q~eed that another F~E is appropriate as evidenced

by an ;~'r:!::)::!:::'::" to this Tas}: Order No.1.

':'he current labor rates are appe ndr-d to the AGREE:!·1L:17':' anr; to

th~s ~ASK ORD~R.

r. P.r:POR':'S Arm DRAt';I!~GS

~he end procucts fo~ PHASE: I shall he a letter report

ccve~in9 the material developed in this Phase, plus three

(3) full sizo copies of the drav.i no s in Tas}: 6 "Concept

Alt.ernatives. "

The ene products for PEASE II ~lil:be a written report

covRring all the tODic~ discu~sed in the tasks above (and as

di~rU~E'~d in the "Sc'Joe of H()rk" presented to the City

Council). The report will contain reduced-size copies of

the draw~ngs prepared during the course of the studv. In

afcition, three (3) full-size copies of each of the drawings

~ill be furnished to the City, plus five (5) copies for use

by the FAA. Forty (40). copies of tl1e report wi 11 be

furnished to CLIENT.
F. J.1r:r::ITJGS

D~Y"':r.gthe cour se of this studv , C0!1SULT11rJ".:' will conduct

w0rkin~lpeetings approximately once monthl~' for the purpose

o~ bringing inteY"e~te~ parties up to date, 0.iscussing issues

c;::ccorrcep t s , making recommendations, etc. C!"'IE~:':' \ViII be vrespo~sible for na~ing the persons to attend these \Vorking

ne etincs, and cor;Sl:L'I'AHT \-lillMail notices to these narne d

persons in advance of each working meeting. CLIEr:,:, may, if

it ~o d~sires, ope~ these working meetings to puhlic attendRj1re~ h~~ever, public participation in working meetings is

Three (3) open public meetings will be coriduc t.ed by Cm;SULTA~~ i~ a place to be provided by CLIENT. These public

~e~~ings ~ill be for the purpose of presenting to the

~eneral public such data and/or drawing~ as have been

d~~e!npec to that time, and to provide the general puhlic an

c~rortu~it~· to co~~ent on the data a~flor drawing~ and

co~ce?~s. ':'hi~is not an adversary proceeding, and debate

on the pro9raM is not included or encouraged.
n: \;rTm:SS \~p.rFTOF, thc C!,IE!":':' and the CO!]SU:"'!'A~7':' h e r e to

II

have nade a:1C ex e cu t ed this Tasy. Order No. 1 t(j th~ PP0fTS-

••

SrO!;;.L SER\'JCrS ,h(~P.::~!~E~:':' the d av and ve ar first. b"21c'.1

C:\~IF()R~:r!'

,"

By._ .- ---_...:...-_-~--.;.-:.---- .>~:." "--

c'

Bv -:

--------------

,/

-J,

Title

'\

D2. -::e~ .p••.. i-'~:...L.'__._'__~.-J,--'---=-----

j

1'1I'if3

I

, -

I

Date

LAPr/J0
SCJ-fI:DUL1:A

F~~lo'·ee CIa s si fication and Ra te Schec5ule

Classification

Rate

Per Hour

95.75

84.75

72.25

64.50

57.75

50.50

45.50

41. 50

I:S

E4

£3

£2

El

53.50

45.50

39.50

33.25

28.75

'1'3

~l

Clerical 16.00

\':0rc Processing 25.50