alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of WVS Financial Corp. (the
Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ David J. BursicDavid J. BursicPresident andChief Executive Officer




Date: September 18, 2012



|      |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|----- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Note: |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be retained by WVS Financial Corp.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### WILTON REALTY CORPORATION, Debt- or, and Equitable Trust Company, as Trustee, Intervenor, Appellants, v. Paul E. WEADOCK, as Examiner, Securities And Exchange Commission, Bondholders’ Protective Committee of “The Wilton” Building Bond Issue, Michigan Public Trust Commission, Appellees.

Nos. 8230, 8231.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 6, 1939.

Affirming order 30 F.Supp. 486.

Lewis Daniels and George E. Brand, both of Detroit, Mich., for appellants.

Paul Weadock, of Detroit, Mich., Joseph L. Weiner and Robert H. Winn, both of Washington, D. C., C. J. Odenweller, Jr., of Chicago, Ill., and Noble T. Lawson and Irving Small, both of Detroit, Mich., for appellees.

Before ALLEN, HAMILTON, and ARANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and argument of counsel, and it appearing there was no clear mistake or abuse of judicial discretion in the orders appealed from, entered December 6, 1938, rejecting the plan of reorganization as proposed by the debtor corporation under section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act as amended, 11 U.S.C.A. § 207, (Price v. Spokane Silver & Lead Company, 8 Cir., 97 F.2d 237; In re Youtie, 3 *1023Cir., 44 F.2d 56; In re Granville & Winthrop Bldg. Corporation, 7 Cir., 87 F.2d 101; Wayne United Gas Company v. Owens-Illinois Glass Company et al., 4 Cir., 91 F.2d 827), and it further appearing that the sua sponte order of the court making the Securities & Exchange Commission a party to these proceedings pursuant to the provisions of the Act of June 22, 1938, Public Act No. 696, chap. 10, Sec. 208 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended, 11 U.S.C.A. § 608, and the appointment of Paul E. Weadock, Examiner, pursuant to the Act of June 22, 1938, chap. 575, 52 Stat. 890, 11 U.S.C.A. § 568, has not resulted in injury to the debtor (Bache v. Louisiana Oil Refining Corporation, 5 Cir., 97 F.2d 445; In re 620 Church Street Corporation, 299 U.S. 24, 27, 57 S.Ct. 88, 81 L.Ed. 16), it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the order appealed from be and it is in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 125 (Monday, September 17, 2012)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D870]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
  No committee meetings were held.
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT PRENTISS JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D21-3556 February 16, 2024 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Melissa M. Polo, Judge. Rachael E. Reese and Olivia M. Goodman of O'Brien Hatfield Reese, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James A. Hellickson, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and BLACK, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior publication.
**Exhibit 32.(a).****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald R. Kimble, President of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.            /s/ Donald R. Kimble           Donald R. Kimble      (chief executive officer)      November 13, 2006
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6861** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. MICHAEL DEMONTE JONES, a/k/a Mike Jones , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:08

- cr - 00396

- FL

- 1 )

Submitted : October 21, 2014 Decided: November 4, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Michael Demonte Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in t his circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Dem onte Jones appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) to reduce sentence . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reason s stated by the district court. United States v. Jones , No. 5:08

- cr - 00396

- FL

- 1 (E.D.N.C. May 23, 2014) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
# C_2019423EN.01002001.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/20

---

Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2019 — (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against QR

(Case C-467/19 PPU) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Directive (EU) 2016/343 - Article 7(4) - Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings - Right to remain silent and right not to incriminate oneself - Agreement between the prosecutor and the offender - Approval of such an agreement by the court - Condition - Consent of the other accused persons - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Not applicable)

(2019/C 423/25)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad

Criminal proceedings against

QR

interveners: Spetsializirana prokuratura, YM, ZK, HD

Operative part of the order

Article 7(4) of Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings must be interpreted as meaning that it does not govern the issue of whether or not the approval, by a court, of an agreement on the imposition of a negotiated sentence, such as the agreement at issue in the main proceedings, concluded between a person accused, on the basis of his alleged membership of a criminal group, and the prosecutor, may be rendered subject to the condition that the other persons accused, on the basis of their membership of that criminal group, must give their consent to the conclusion of that agreement.

---

(1)  OJ C 280, 19.8.2019.

---
#### Rayford MORRIS, Plaintiff in Error, v. Paul WISE, Defendant in Error.

No. 36618.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Oct. 18, 1955.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 21, 1956.

*552Paul 'Pugh, Francis G. Morgan, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff'in error.

Grigsby, Foliart & Hunt, Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

CORN, Justice.

This is a companion case to Morris v. Wise, Okl., 293 P.2d 547 and the allegations of the petition in each case are identical with the exception of certain items of damage. The syllabus in the former case is adopted as the syllabus in this case, and the judgment is affirmed.

WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and DAVISON, HALLEY, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.

JOHNSON, C. J., dissents.
================================================================================


                                  Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tari Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.       The  Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a)
         or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.



Date:  March 13, 2007

/s/ Theodore Tsagkaris

------------------------------
Theodore Tsagkaris
President, C.E.O. and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Oscar H. HENTSCHEL, Liquidating Trustee, etc., Appellant, v. FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND.

No. 11379.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

June 6, 1939.

Erwin F. Vetter and George T. Priest, both of St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

Herbert E. Barnard and A. Lyon Anderson, both of St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed with prejudice, at costs of appellee, but without taxation of attorney’s docket fee, per stipulation of parties. <
Eyaletler Arası Ticarete Konu Hayvanlar için Federal Koyun ve 

Keçi Resmi Tanımlanması Karar Ağacı 

Tanımlama kuralları, ilgili hayvan eyaletler arası ticarete ilk girdiğinde, söz gelimi hayvanlar pazarlarda, satış 

yerlerinde, sergi yerlerinde, ya da eyaletler arası ticaretin gerçekleştiği diğer mahallerde indirildiğinde; hayvanlar 

bir Eyalet sınırından geçirildiğinde; hayvanlar Eyalet dışındaki bir alıcıya satıldığında; ya da eyaletler arası ticaretle 

uğraşan kişiler hayvanları iktisap ettiklerinde uygulanır. Hayvanların ikamet Eyaletinde veya alıcı Eyalette ek 

gereklilikler uygulanıyor olabilir.

1 Yalnızca her iki tesisin de aynı kişiye ait olduğu veya aynı kişi tarafından kiralandığı ve başka bir sürüden kimliği tespit edilemeyen diğer hayvanlarla karışmadığı 

durumlarda geçerlidir. 

2 Onaylı bir pazar, tanımlanmamış karışık kaynaklı sağlam hayvanları tanımlamak ve kısıtsız olarak satmak üzere kabul edemez. Bu tür hayvanlar kesimle 

kısıtlanmış olarak satılmalıdır. Mevzuat uyarınca, 18 aylık ya da daha büyük olan hayvanların kabul edilebilmesi için hayvan pazarlarının da bir uygunluk 

sözleşmesi imzalamış olması gerekmektedir. 

3 Kesim kanallarında olmayıp da Eyalet içi bir pazara giden resmi ve ferdi olarak tanımlanmış hayvanlar için hayvan sahibi/taşımacı beyanına gerek yoktur.

BURADAN BAŞLAYIN

Evet Hayır

Evet

Evet

Evet

Evet

Evet

Evet

Hayır

Hayır

Hayır

Hayır

Hayır

Hayır

Hayvanlar cinsel 

bakımdan sağlam mı?

Hayvanlar kesim 

kanallarında mı?

Hayvanlar 18 aylıktan küçük 

mü (hem tek hem de karışık 

kaynaklı olanlar dahil)?

Hayvanlar sevk ve idare veya 

otlatma amacıyla1 federal 

makamlarca onaylanmış2 bir 

pazara mı taşınıyor?

Hayvanlar tek bir 

kaynaktan mı geliyor?

Resmi hayvan 

kimliği ve hayvan 

sahibi/taşımacı 

beyanı gereklidir.

Resmi hayvan kimliği ve 

Eyaletler Arası Veteriner Muayene 

Sertifikası yerine grup kimlik numarasını 

içeren bir hayvan sahibi/taşımacı beyanı3

kullanılabilir.

Resmi hayvan 

kimliği ve 

Eyaletlerarası Veteriner 

Muayene Sertifikası 

gereklidir.

Resmi hayvan kimliği gereklidir 

(hayvan sahibi/taşımacı beyanı 

veya Eyaletlerarası Veteriner 

Muayene Sertifikası gerekli 

değildir).

Hayvanlar 18 aylıktan 

küçük mü?

Gereklilikler yok.

Hayvanlar Eyalet 

sınırları geçiyor mu?
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1613]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     HONORING AARON RILEY BRADSHAW

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. SAM GRAVES

                              of missouri

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. GRAVES of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I proudly pause to recognize 
Aaron Riley Bradshaw. Aaron is a very special young man who has 
exemplified the finest qualities of citizenship and leadership by 
taking an active part in the Boy Scouts of America, Troop 271, and 
earning the most prestigious award of Eagle Scout.
  Aaron has been very active with his troop, participating in many 
scout activities. Over the many years Aaron has been involved with 
scouting, he has not only earned numerous merit badges, but also the 
respect of his family, peers, and community. Most notably, Aaron has 
refused to see his autism as a handicap, but rather as an opportunity 
to grow and thrive as an individual. His journey to the rank of Eagle 
Scout has been an inspiration for his friends, fellow scouts and 
especially his family, all of whom are extremely proud of what he has 
accomplished as an Eagle Scout.
  Mr. Speaker, I proudly ask you to join me in commending Aaron Riley 
Bradshaw for his accomplishments with the Boy Scouts of America and for 
his efforts put forth in achieving the highest distinction of Eagle 
Scout.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6278]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. McCLINTOCK:
       H.R. 6532.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 (the 
     Property Clause), which confers on Congress the power to 
     dispose of property belonging to the United States.
```
#### Habeas Corpus of Willie NEAL, Jr., Petitioner.

No. A-12357.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

May 2, 1956.

*571Paul & Montgomery, Durant, for petitioner.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., James Garrett, Asst. Atty. Gen., W. H. Parker, County Atty., Atoka County, Atoka, fot respondent.

BRETT, Judge.

This is an original petition in habeas corpus brought by petitioner, Willie Neal, Jr., for the purpose of being admitted to bail for the charge of the murder of Freddie Fisher now pending in the District Court of Atoka County, Oklahoma.

The verified petition alleges that the petitioner is being unlawfully restrained of his liberty in the County Jail of Atoka County, Oklahoma, where he is awaiting trial on an information pending in the aforesaid court in the aforesaid county and state. He alleges that proof of guilt of the said crime allegedly committed on March 11, 1956, is not evident nor the presumption thereof great. It appears that he was denied bail at the preliminary hearing before the Honorable Gilbert W. Dan-ey, Judge of the County Court, sitting as the examining magistrate on a habeas corpus proceeding.

A transcript of those proceedings was offered in evidence. Thereafter, the defendant was sworn and orally testified in his own behalf. It will not be necessary to set out the evidence in detail, nor to comment on the weight of the evidence. It has been repeatedly held that right to bail in capital cases is absolute unless proof is evident, or presumption great that the defendant is guilty as charged, and in case of conviction he would probably receive life imprisonment or death. It appears such may be the situation, herein. Ex parte Christenberry, 82 Okl.Cr. 378, 170 P.2d 871; Ex parte Lee, 91 Okl.Cr. 426, 219 P.2d 638; Ex parte O’Quinn, 95 Okl.Cr. 430, 247 P.2d 537. We are further of the opinion, under the circumstances, that reasonable bond would be in the sum of Thirty Thousand Dollars.

It is therefore ordered that the petitioner be admitted to bail in the sum of Thirty Thousand Dollars to be approved by the District Court Clerk of Atoka County, Oklahoma, and when said bond is given and approved by the District Court Clerk that the petitioner be released to await trial and the further order of the said court.

POWELL, J., concurs.

JONES, P. J., not participating.
Counties in Bold Contain Distressed Areas

County Economic Status and Number of Distressed Areas in 

Appalachian Georgia, Fiscal Year 2021

County Status

Economic

Areas

Distressed

Number of

County Status

Economic

Areas

Distressed

Number of

Banks Transitional

Barrow Transitional 1

Bartow Transitional 1

Carroll Transitional 2

Catoosa Transitional

Chattooga At-Risk 2

Cherokee Competitive

Dade Transitional

Dawson Competitive

Douglas Transitional

Elbert At-Risk 2

Fannin Transitional

Floyd Transitional 7

Forsyth Attainment

Franklin At-Risk 2

Gilmer Transitional 1

Gordon Transitional 4

Gwinnett Transitional 10

Habersham Transitional 1

Hall Transitional 4

Haralson Transitional

Hart Transitional 1

Heard Transitional

Jackson Transitional

Lumpkin Transitional

Madison Transitional

Murray At-Risk

Paulding Transitional

Pickens Transitional

Polk At-Risk 2

Rabun Transitional 1

Stephens Transitional 1

Towns At-Risk

Union Transitional

Walker Transitional 4

White Transitional

Whitfield Transitional 5

Appalachian Regional Commission, June 2020
Distressed Areas in Appalachian Georgia, 

Fiscal Year 2021

County

Census Tract 

ID Number County

Census Tract 

ID Number

Barrow 1802.03

Bartow 9608.02

Carroll 9105.01

Carroll 9105.02

Chattooga 103

Chattooga 105

Elbert 1

Elbert 4

Floyd 5

Floyd 6

Floyd 11

Floyd 12

Floyd 13

Floyd 16

Floyd 21

Franklin 8901.01

Franklin 8904

Gilmer 804

Gordon 9702

Gordon 9703

Gordon 9704

Gordon 9706

Gwinnett 503.19

Gwinnett 504.17

Gwinnett 504.18

Gwinnett 504.21

Gwinnett 504.22

Gwinnett 504.24

Gwinnett 505.22

Gwinnett 505.24

Gwinnett 505.37

Gwinnett 505.41

Habersham 6.02

Hall 7.01

Hall 8

Hall 10.03

Hall 11.01

Hart 9604

Polk 104

Polk 105

Rabun 9702.02

Stephens 9703.01

Walker 201

Walker 202

Walker 203.01

Walker 207

Whitfield 4

Whitfield 5.02

Whitfield 10

Whitfield 11

Whitfield 13

Appalachian Regional Commission, June 2020
HALL FLOYD

POLK

GILMER

BARTOW

RABUN

WALKER

FANNIN

CARROLL

UNION

ELBERT

HART

HEARD

GWINNETT

MURRAY

GORDON

CHEROKEE

WHITE

JACKSON

BANKS

LUMPKIN

DADE

PAULDING

MADISON

WHITFIELD

FRANKLIN

PICKENS

FORSYTH

HARALSON

CHATTOOGA

DAWSON

TOWNS

DOUGLAS

BARROW

STEPHENS

CATOOSA

HABERSHAM

0 25 50

Miles

Levels of

Economic Status

Distressed County

At-Risk County

Transitional County

Competitive County

Attainment County

County Economic Status in Appalachian Georgia,

Fiscal Year 2021
HALL

FLOYD

CARROLL

POLK

BARTOW

GILMER

WALKER

ELBERT

HART

FANNIN

RABUN

UNION

MURRAY

GWINNETT

HEARD

GORDON

CHEROKEE

WHITE

JACKSON

BANKS

PAULDING

WHITFIELD

MADISON

LUMPKIN

FRANKLIN

FORSYTH

DADE

HARALSON

CHATTOOGA

PICKENS

DAWSON

TOWNS

DOUGLAS

HABERSHAM

BARROW

CATOOSA

STEPHENS

County Economic Status and Distressed Areas in

Appalachian Georgia, Fiscal Year 2021

G A

0 15 30

Miles

Levels of

Economic Status

Distressed County

At-Risk County

Distressed Area

Transitional County

Distressed Area

Competitive County

Attainment County

T N N C

S C
Modification of Security Agreement



 Exhibit 10-4 
 MODIFICATION OF SECURITY AGREEMENT 
 This
Modification of BB&T Security Agreement, made this 4th
day of January, 2012, by and between SOUTHEAST POWER CORPORATION, a Florida corporation (“Debtor”) and BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation (“Secured Party”). 

RECITALS 

1. Debtor and Secured Party entered into that certain BB&T Security Agreement dated February 22, 2011 (“Security
Agreement”). 
 2. Security Agreement was entered into in connection with a certain Promissory Note dated February 22,
2011 (including all extensions, renewals modifications, and substitutions thereof) in the original principal amount of Six Million Nine Hundred Forty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($6,940,000.00) made in favor of Secured Party by Southeast Power
Corporation as Borrower, and other loan documents related thereto, (the “Southeast Note”). 
 3. The Goldfield
Corporation has executed a Renewal Promissory Note dated December 30, 2011 in the original amount of $3,000,000.00 in favor of Secured Party (the “Goldfield Note”). 

4. Debtor desires to secure and collateralize the Goldfield Note under the Security Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, for the sum of $10.00 and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and are
expressly incorporated herein. 
 2. Cross-Collateralization. Debtor hereby agrees, stipulates and acknowledges that the
term “obligations” as defined in Section 1.2 of the Security Agreement shall include (in addition to the liabilities under the Southeast Note), all of the obligations and liabilities under the Goldfield Note to the same and full
extent as the Southeast Note. Debtor further agrees and stipulates that the collateral and security interests granted in the Security Agreement shall secure the indebtedness evidenced by the Goldfield Note and the Southeast Note. 

3. Miscellaneous. Except as expressly modified herein, all other terms and provisions of the Security Agreement remain in full
force and effect, and Debtor reaffirms, confirms and acknowledges that all terms and provisions of the Security Agreement as modified herein remain valid and effective. 







 The parties have signed this Modification of Security Agreement under seal as of the date
and year first written above. 
  

									
	WITNESSES:	 		 	SOUTHEAST POWER CORPORATION, a Florida corporation
			
	 /s/ Barry Forbes
	 		 	
	Print Name:	 	 Barry Forbes
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Stephen R. Wherry

		 		 		 		 	Stephen R. Wherry, Treasurer
	 /s/ John W. Davis III
	 		 		 	
	Print Name:	 	 John W. Davis III
	 		 		 	


  
 2