alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF MAX RE CAPITAL LTD.**

 

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies thequarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 of Max Re Capital Ltd. (the “Issuer”). 

 

I, Robert J. Cooney, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that: 

 

(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or78o(d)); and 

 

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version ofthis written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

Dated: May 2, 2005
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 31, 2018 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01109-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF R.E. AND F.A.E., CHILDREN 

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-06294 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

The notice of appeal filed by Father recites he is challenging the trial court’s June 26, 2018 

final judgment. Because nothing before the Court reflects a final judgment was signed on that date 

or any other date, we questioned our jurisdiction over the appeal and requested briefing from the 

parties. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (subject to mostly 

statutory exceptions, appeal may only be taken from final judgment); see also Martinez v. Humble 

Sand & Gravel, Inc., 875 S.W.2d 311, 313 (Tex. 1994) (per curiam) (appellate timetable runs from 

date final order or judgment is signed). Father complied; Mother did not respond. 

In his jurisdictional brief, Father explains he filed the appeal out of concern that a 

memorandum ruling signed by the trial court June 26th could be construed as a final judgment.1

 

 1

 Father asserts a February 7, 2018 memorandum ruling is the final judgment and the June 26th judgment is void because it was signed outside 

the trial court’s plenary power. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(d),(e). 
 –2– 

That ruling followed a bench trial, granted the parties a divorce, and described the court’s findings. 

However, it required preparation of an order and cautioned that the case would be dismissed if an 

order was not presented to the court for signature by a specific day. It is not a final judgment.2 

See Greene v. State, 324 S.W.3d 276, 281-82 (Tex. App.—Austin 2010, no pet.) (letter to parties 

describing court’s findings and asking party to prepare judgment insufficient to serve as appealable 

order). 

Because nothing before us reflects a final judgment has been signed, we dismiss the appeal 

for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195. 

181109F.P05 

 

 2

 For the same reason, the February 7th ruling is not a final judgment. 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

IN THE INTEREST OF R.E. AND F.A.E., 

CHILDREN 

No. 05-18-01109-CV 

 On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-06294. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Evans and Brown participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

 We ORDER appellee Maria Imelda Enriquez Torres recover her costs, if any, of this 

appeal from appellant Armando Enriquez. 

Judgment entered December 31, 2018.
Amendment #14 to Master Services Agreement



 Exhibit 10.11.16 

AMENDMENT #14 
 TO 
 SYNACOR MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT 

This Amendment (“Amendment”) effective July 25, 2011 (“Amendment Effective Date”) is between Synacor, Inc.
(“Synacor”) and Embarq Management Company, (“Embarq”) under which the parties hereto mutually agree to modify and amend the Synacor Master Services Agreement, MSA No. MSAX063015TPS, dated December 4,
2006 including the contract orders, exhibits, schedules and amendments thereto (the “Agreement”). All terms defined herein shall be applicable solely to this Amendment. Any capitalized terms used herein, which are defined in the
Agreement and not otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. 
 In consideration of the premises and
mutual covenants herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	1.0	Modification of Notice Period: The parties hereby agree that notwithstanding the required notice period set forth in Section 6.1 of the Agreement, either
party shall have until September 1, 2011 to provide the other written notice of its intent not to renew the Agreement. If no notice is received by either party on or before September 1, 2011, the Agreement will automatically renew in
accordance with its Section 6.1. 

  

	2.0	Scope of Amendment: This Amendment supersedes all proposals, oral or written, all negotiations, conversations, or discussions between or among parties relating
to the subject matter of this Amendment and all past dealing or industry custom. This Amendment shall be integrated in and form part of the Agreement upon execution. All terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged except as
expressly modified in this Amendment; and the terms of the Agreement, as modified by this Amendment, are hereby ratified and confirmed. Where the terms of the Agreement conflict with those of this Amendment, however, the terms of this Amendment
shall control. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date. 

 

									
	SYNACOR, INC.	 		 	Embarq Management Company
					
	By:	 	 /s/ George G. Chamoun
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Robert W. Smith II

					
	Name:	 	 George G. Chamoun
	 		 	Name:	 	 Robert W. Smith II

					
	Title:	 	 EVP
	 		 	Title:	 	 Manager - Sourcing
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Casey J. Sylla, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Lincoln Benefit Life Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 13, 2006

                                                     /s/ Casey J. Sylla
                                                     ------------------
                                                     Casey J. Sylla
                                                     Chairman of the Board and
                                                     President
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/07 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1583-E1584]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             SUPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF THE GEORGIA AQUARIUM

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. TOM PRICE

                               of georgia

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Mr. PRICE of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, today I rise to honor the 
wonderful work being done by the Georgia Aquarium, which is located in 
the heart of downtown Atlanta. With more than 10 million gallons of 
water, the Georgia Aquarium is the world's largest with more aquatic 
life than any other aquarium, and six distinct galleries that portray 
diverse aquatic habitats, ranging from arctic to tropical waters. Since 
opening its doors in 2005, Georgia Aquarium has established itself as a 
leader in aquatic animal conservation and research. The results of this 
research are shared with the global zoological community for the 
enhancement of animals everywhere, thus showcasing Georgia as a global 
center of animal study.
  Currently, Georgia Aquarium is one of only six accredited facilities 
in North America that is capable of providing care for beluga whales, a

[[Page E1584]]

species which is presently listed by the International Union for the 
Conservation of Nature as ``near-threatened'' in its indigenous Arctic 
and sub-Arctic environment. In June 2012, the aquarium applied for a 
permit to import 18 beluga whales to the United States with the purpose 
of conducting research which must be done in human care, for the 
continued edification of aquarium guests, and to secure the 
sustainability of the population in North American zoological parks and 
aquariums. Applying this important research can help the scientific 
community better understand the growing problems beluga whales face in 
their natural habitats. This application is corroborated by a five-year 
research study, authenticated by the International Union for the 
Conservation of Nature, validating that the acquisition of beluga 
whales will have no damaging impact to the beluga population of origin.
  Mr. Speaker, the extraordinary work the Georgia Aquarium has done in 
pursuing research and educating citizens is highly commendable. The 
aquarium's recent efforts to study beluga whales will undoubtedly 
improve our scientific understanding of this threatened species. 
Therefore, I enthusiastically support Georgia Aquarium in its endeavor 
to increase the North American beluga population to help to maintain a 
sustainable population of whales in human care in certified facilities.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Tony Chung, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LiquidmetalTechnologies;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 daysprior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c) presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the designor operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated inthis quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Date: December 27, 2004 | /s/ Tony Chung                                |   |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         | Tony Chung                                    |
|                         | Vice President of Finance                     |
|                         | (Principal Financial and Accounting  Officer) |

 

1

----
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 of Lincoln Benefit Life
Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Lincoln
Benefit Life Company.

March 18, 2009

                                                 /s/ FREDERICK F. CRIPE
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Frederick F. Cripe
                                                 Chairman of the Board and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

                                                 /s/ JOHN C. PINTOZZI
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 John C. Pintozzi
                                                 Senior Vice President and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Blast Energy Services,
      Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
      M. Adams, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Principal
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      May
      15, 2006





By:
            /s/
                David M. AdamsDavid
                M. AdamsCo-Chief
                Executive OfficerChief
                Operating OfficerPrincipal
                Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.54

[US Diagnostic Logo]                                              Joseph A. Paul
                                                                 President & CEO



Sent via facsimile 215-230-1845
July 19, 1999

Mr. Rich Miller
DVI financial Services, Inc.
500 Hyde Park
Doylestown, Pennsylvania 18901

Dear Rich:

In connection with our discussions, we are requesting DVI's approval for the
following Item in connection with the filing of our 10Q for the period ended
June 30, 1999.

Both US Diagnostic Inc. ("USD") and DVI agree that any further documentation
necessary to accomplish the matter outlined herein will be followed up on
expeditiously under separate cover. The following item is being requested by
USD:

1.  DVI hereby agrees to amend the outstanding twenty-five million dollar note,
    dated December 21, 1998, to extend the maturity date from June 21, 2000
    until July 1, 2001.

If you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to give me a
call otherwise, please execute a copy of this letter where indicated
acknowledging your approval to the above.

Very truly yours,

US DIAGNOSTIC INC.

By: /s/ JOSEPH A. PAUL
    ------------------------------
    Joseph A. Paul
    President & Chief Executive Officer

ACKNOWLEDGED & AGREED TO
This ___ day of __________, 1999

By: /s/ RICHARD E. MILLER
    ------------------------------
Printed Name: Richard E. Miller
              --------------------
Title: President
      ----------------------------
DVI Financial Services, Inc.





              777 South Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

D.G., FATHER OF D.L. , A CHILD

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 18

- 1049

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND

FAMILIES

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 15, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Stasia Warren, Judge.

Ryan Thomas Truskoski, of Ryan Thomas Truskoski, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Ward L. Metz g er, Appellate Counsel, Children’s Legal Services, Department of Children and Families, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

Thomasina Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Appellate Counsel, Guardian ad Litem Program, Tallahassee

, f or Guardian ad

Litem.2

PER CURIAM.

D.G. appeals the order terminating his parental rights to D.L. We affirm. The

record supports the trial court’s findings that the Department of Children and Families

(“DCF ”) proved, by clear and convincing evidence, a ground for termination pursuant to

section 39.806(1)(d)(3), Florida Statutes (2017). 1 Because DCF was required to prove

only one statutory ground for termination, we do not need to address whether the trial

c ourt correctly relied on other grounds for termination. 2 See § 39.802(4)(a), Fla. Stat.

(2017); S.D . v. Dep’t of Child. & Fam

. Serv s. , 80 So. 3d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., and TORPY and EVANDER

, JJ., concur.

1 Section 39.806(1)(d)(3) provides that grounds for termination of parental rights may be established where the court determines by clear and convincing evidence “ that continuing the parental relationship with the incarcerated parent would be harmful to the child and, for this reason, that termination of parental rights of an incarcerated parent is

in the best interest of the child.”

2 We recognize that DCF conce ded that some of the statutory grounds relied upon by the trial court for termination were not supported by the evidence.