alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Regional Administrator Region 9, Arizona, California 

Environmental Protection 75 Hawthorne Street Hawaii, Nevada, Guam 

Agency San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 American Samoa, 

Northern Marianas Islands 

For Immediate Release: February 11, 2011

Contact: Margot Perez-Sullivan, (415) 947-4149, perezsullivan.margot@epa.gov

EPA’s new proposal to Four Corners Power Plant cuts more NOx emissions, protects 

health, saves jobs 

Arizona Public Service lauded for saving Native American jobs, environment 

 

SAN FRANCISCO – Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced a 

supplemental proposal to reduce emissions from the Four Corners Power Plant. The new 

proposal will reduce nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from approximately 45,000 tons per year 

to 5,800 tons per year, 3,200 tons less than EPA’s initial proposal. The proposal will also work to 

protect public health in the area by ensuring residents have cleaner air with fewer harmful 

pollutants. 

Today’s action follows EPA’s initial October proposal to require pollution controls at the Four 

Corners Power Plant. In response to that proposal, Arizona Public Service put forward an 

alternative requiring plant operators to install Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) on two of the 

five coal-fired boilers and shut down the three older ones. SCR is the most stringent pollution 

control technology available for this type of facility. 

“The new proposal controls emissions better, while costing less and preserving jobs”, said Jared 

Blumenfeld, EPA’s Regional Administrator for the Pacific Southwest. “This plant is the nation’s 

largest source of nitrogen oxides. By reducing its emissions by 87% - rather than our initial 

proposal of 80% - we will all be able to see the results and breathe cleaner, healthier air.” 

Four Corners Power Plant and the Navajo Mine which supplies its coal, employ roughly 1000 

people, 75% of whom are Native American. Both facilities have pledged “No Layoffs” if Units 

1-3 are closed. 

Today’s proposal would reduce visibility impact from Four Corners Power Plant by an average 

72% at the national parks and wilderness areas. Every year over 280 million people visit our 

nation’s most treasured parks and wilderness areas. Yet, many visitors aren’t able to see the 

spectacular vistas because of the veil of white or brown haze that hangs in the air, reducing 

visibility and dulling the natural beauty. 

EPA is requesting comment on today’s proposal in addition to the October 2010 proposal by 

May 2, 2011. Members of the public in the Four Corners area will have four opportunities to 

attend open houses and public hearings during the week of March 28, 2011. For additional 

information on the proposed rulemaking and opportunities to provide input, please go to: 

http://www.epa.gov/region9/air/navajo/
Exhibit 99.1
 
 PRESS RELEASE  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 Contacts:
 Media:
    
    Janice McDill
    
    Matthew Sherman / Andi SalasGrubb & Ellis
    
    Joele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher312.698.6707
    
    212.355.4449janice.mcdill@grubb-ellis.com
    
    msherman@joelefrank.com / asalas@joelefrank.comInvestors:
    
    Laurie Connell / Amy BilbijaMacKenzie Partners, Inc.212.378.7071 / 650.798.5206lconnell@mackenziepartners.com / abilbija@mackenziepartners.com
 Grubb & Ellis Stockholders Re-Elect Board of Directors Nominees at 2008 Annual Meeting
 Inspector of Elections Preliminary Report Confirms that All of Dissidents Candidates and
Bylaw Proposals Were Defeated
 SANTA ANA, Calif. (Dec. 10, 2008)




---



##### 



2  2  2  12/10/08  Grubb & Ellis Stockholders Re-Elect Board of Directors Nominees at 2008 Annual Meeting
  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
    
    FORManagementHarold H. Greene
    
    
    28,486,574Devin I. Murphy
    
    
    32,839,367D. Fleet Wallace
    
    
    28,482,376OppositionAnthony W. Thompson
    
    
    19,884,716Harold A. Ellis, Jr.
    
    
    25,624,199Stuart A. Tanz
    
    
    25,624,414
  About Grubb & Ellis
  www.grubb-ellis.com
 Forward-Looking Statements
  ###
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IVI Communications, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: August 21, 2006              /s/ Charles Roodenburg
                                   ----------------------
                                   Charles Roodenburg, Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1581]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. KEVIN BRADY

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Mr. BRADY of Texas. Mr. Speaker, on rollcall No. 586, I was 
unavoidably detained and could not be present for last night's rollcall 
vote on H.R. 5912, a bill that would amend the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 to prohibit the use of public funds for political party 
conventions and provide for the return of any previously-distributed 
funds for deficit reduction. I am a strong supporter of this 
legislation. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yes.''

                          ____________________
```
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4923 

To make exclusive the authority of the Federal Government to regulate 

the labeling of products made in the United States and introduced 

in interstate or foreign commerce, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2018 

Mr. ISSA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To make exclusive the authority of the Federal Government 

to regulate the labeling of products made in the United 

States and introduced in interstate or foreign commerce, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reinforcing American5 Made Products Act of 2017’’. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4923 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSIVITY OF FEDERAL AUTHORITY TO REGU2 LATE LABELING OF PRODUCTS MADE IN THE 

3 UNITED STATES AND INTRODUCED IN INTER4 STATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE. 

5 Section 320933 of the Violent Crime Control and 

6 Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (15 U.S.C. 45a) is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘To the ex9 tent’’ and inserting the following: 

10 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—To the extent’’; 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(b) EFFECT ON STATE LAW.—The provisions of 

13 this section shall supersede any provisions of the law of 

14 any State relating to the extent to which a product is in15 troduced, delivered for introduction, sold, advertised, or 

16 offered for sale in interstate or foreign commerce with a 

17 ‘Made in the U.S.A.’ or ‘Made in America’ label, or the 

18 equivalent thereof, in order to represent that such product 

19 was in whole or substantial part of domestic origin.’’; and 

20 (3) in the third sentence of subsection (a), as 

21 designated by paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Nothing 

22 in this section’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as provided in 

23 subsection (b), nothing in this section’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
WSWC Member Issues and Questions

General Questions and Comments

(1) Does EPA agree that the proposal will not affect (neither expanding nor 

retracting) the geographic scope of where tribes are eligible for treatment as a 

state?

(2) How would EPA determine whether such activities fall under state or tribal 

jurisdiction? How would EPA address potential conflicts or differences of opinion 

regarding the extent of tribal jurisdiction over such activities?

(3) I also expect that you may get some questions on the potential impacts to states 

if more tribes receive TAS authority, including the possibility that some tribes may 

enact standards that are more stringent that state standards. I would expect that 

these questions would fall along the lines of what EPA would do to address this 

type of situation when reviewing TAS proposals.

(4) Would this proposal only apply to landed tribes?

(5) How would the proposal apply to trust lands? Would it apply to allotments?

(6) How would the proposal define “reservation?” 

(7) Will the approval mechanism for tribal water quality standards be the same as 

the mechanism for state water quality standards?

Specific State Comments and Questions: 

(1) South Dakota:

We believe this proposal has the potential to have significant impacts in our 

state and anticipate our Attorney General’s Office will work together with 

other state Attorneys General on a response should a rule be proposed. 

If a state is delegated or has an EPA approved environmental program, we 

are required to provide an Attorney General’s Statement documenting we 

have adequate authority to carry out the program. We believe it is 
reasonable for EPA to require and to review information on a tribe’s legal 

authority as part of this process.

It also appears that EPA wants to eliminate the requirement to seek 

comments on EPA’s factual findings concerning inherent tribal authority for 

treatment as a state from appropriate governmental entities and local 

parties. We would also not support this change to the process.

In addition, EPA’s proposal is directly contrary to the requirements 

established by U.S. Supreme Court decisions concerning the assertion of 

tribal jurisdiction over non-members and non-Indians.

(2) Oklahoma: 

Oklahoma has noted that it has 39 tribes that do not have reservations, which 

Congress recognized when it established a special requirement that no TAS approvals 

can be granted without a cooperative agreement with the state. Its question is as 

follows: 

How would the proposal affect the rather unique situation we have with 

regard to the additional requirements passed by Congress for tribes seeking 

TAS in Oklahoma?
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1617-E1618]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 IN HONOR OF THE BUCKS-MONT CHAPTER OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE 
                          REMODELING INDUSTRY

                                 ______
                                 

                      HON. MICHAEL G. FITZPATRICK

                            of pennsylvania

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. FITZPATRICK. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize the Bucks-
Mont Chapter of the National Association of the Remodeling Industry for 
their service to the local community.
  For twenty years, this chapter of NAIR has worked tirelessly to 
educate and grow successful business while improving the homes of 
families who need it most.
  Over the last decade the men and women of the Bucks-Mont NAIR have 
put in over 7,334 volunteer man hours. These volunteers have donated 
their time, as well as the necessary tools and materials for worthwhile 
causes such as Habitat for Humanity, the New Beginnings Community 
Church, and the Vietnam Veteran Project.
  Throughout its twenty year history, this chapter has showed a 
continued commitment to serving others who are in need and I am 
confident that they will continue to do so for years to come.

[[Page E1618]]

                          ____________________
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
      ( print page 1579)    
*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Gut-Brain Interactions (Parkinson's Disease).                    

*Date:*                         April 19, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Maria E. Davila-Bloom, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 7017, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-7637,                         *davila-bloomm@extra.niddk.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 4, 2024. 

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-00293 Filed 1-9-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6393]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The majority leader is recognized.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 3.1

                                  AMENDMENT OF
                          ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
                     FEDERAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION

CORPORATE NAME:   FEDERAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION

This  amendment  shall be  effective  on the day it is filed with the  Minnesota
Secretary of State.

The  following  amendments to articles  regulating  the above  corporation  were
adopted:

          Subsection 1.1 of ARTICLE 1 (NAME) is amended to read as follows:

          1.1  The   name  of  the   corporation   shall   be   AMERICAN   DREAM
               ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

          Subsection 3.1 of ARTICLE 3 (CAPITAL  STOCK) is amended to read in its
          entirety as follows:

          3.1  Authorized  Shares.  The  aggregate  number  of  shares  that the
               corporation  has  authority  to  issue,  shall be  Fifty  Million
               (50,000,000)  shares of common  stock  with a par value of $.0001
               per share.



This amendment has been approved  pursuant to Minnesota  Statues Chapter 302A. I
certify that I am  authorized to execute this  amendment  and I further  certify
that I understand that by signing this amendment,  I am subject to the penalties
of perjury as set forth in Section  609.48 as if I signed this  amendment  under
oath.


                                         ------------------------------------
                                             Dirk W. Peschar
                                             President


Name and telephone number of contact person:       Michael T. Cronin, Esq.
                                                  (727) 461-1818
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1642]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     IN RECOGNITION OF BARRY BROWN

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. MICHAEL C. BURGESS

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. BURGESS. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor Barry Brown. Barry 
served as my chief of staff when I was elected into the House of 
Representatives in 2002 and recently transitioned into his new role 
with the Alpine Group here in D.C. During the ten years Barry served as 
chief of staff in my office, I always appreciated his dedication and 
loyalty to the staff, constituents, and to me.
  After receiving his Bachelor of Arts from Texas Tech University, 
Barry began his career as a legislative assistant for the House 
Agriculture Committee Chairman, Larry Combest. Barry later became the 
legislative director to Representative Kevin Brady and the chief of 
staff to Representative Kay Granger. While on Capitol Hill, he also 
served Representative Dick Armey and Senator Phil Gramm. Before working 
for my office, Barry was also the Vice President with the Alpine Group.
  As a fifth-generation Texan, Barry participates on the National Board 
of Directors for the Red Raider Club and is a third generation member 
of the Texas State Society. Barry is also the assistant treasurer of 
the Vestry of St. Patrick's Episcopal Church.
  As you can see Barry is very active in the community and has a 
passion for Texas and for politics. While Barry can boast many 
legislative and political achievements, I know he will say his greatest 
success is being a husband and father. Barry is married to Jennifer 
Brown who is the chief of staff for Representative Lamar Smith. 
Together, they have a son, Leighton, and a daughter, Gipson.
  I want to express my appreciation and best wishes to Barry as 
furthers his career with the Alpine Group. He will be dearly missed and 
always warmly welcomed in my office.

                          ____________________
```
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5044 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the treatment of certain surviving spouses under the contracting 

goals and preferences of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5044 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Service-Disabled Vet3 erans Small Business Continuation Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT REGARDING TREATMENT 

5 OF CERTAIN SURVIVING SPOUSES UNDER 

6 CONTRACTING GOALS AND PREFERENCES OF 

7 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

8 Effective on the date specified in subsection (e) of 

9 section 1832 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

10 for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 

11 2660), section 8127(k)(3) of title 38, United States Code, 

12 as amended by such section 1832, is further amended by 

13 inserting after the period at the end the following new sen14 tence: ‘‘A surviving spouse of such a veteran who is not 

15 covered by subparagraph (C)(i) of such section by reason 

16 of the disability rating of the veteran being less than 100 

17 percent shall be treated as being so covered during the 

18 period beginning on the date of the death of the veteran 

19 and ending on the date that is 3 years after such death, 

20 the date on which the surviving spouse remarries, or the 

21 date on which the surviving spouse relinquishes an 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5044 RFS 

1 ownership interest in the small business concern, which2 ever occurs first.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS