alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I,Michael A. Schneider, President and Chief Executive Officer of Affinity Group, Inc.,a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify as follows:

 

1.                                       This statement isprovided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,2008 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

2.                                       The PeriodicReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.                                       The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the datesand for the periods indicated therein.

 

 
| Date:  June 5, 2009 |                                   |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                     |                                   |
|                     |                                   |
|                     | /s/  Michael A. Schneider              |
|                     |                                   |
|                     | Michael  A. Schneider                  |
|                     | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

NO. DA 22-0034

LUSTRE OIL COMPANY LLC, and EREHWON OIL & GAS, LLC a Montana Professional Corporation,

Appellants,

-vsANADARKO MINERALS, INC. and A&S MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CO. LLC,

Appellees

ORDER GRANTING APPELLANTS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

Pursuant to unopposed moti on, and good cause appearing;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant s are granted an additional thirty

(30) days from April 1, 2022, up to and including May 1, 2022, to file their

opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court March 21 2022

03/21/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0034
## IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________



### m 00-20940

_______________



### W. S UE 

### L

EFALL 

### ,
Plaintiff, 

### W. S UE 

### L

EFALL 

### , Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS



### B OARD OF 

### R EGENTS OF 

### T EXAS 

### S OUTHERN 

### U NIVERSITY 

### ;

W ILLARD 

### L. J ACKSON 

### , IN H IS O FFICIAL C APACITY AS C HAIRMAN OF THE B OARD OF R EGENTS

OF T EXAS S OUTHERN U NIVERSITY ; 

### J AMES 

### M. D OUGLAS 

### , IN H IS O FFICIAL C APACITY AS P RESIDENT OF T EXAS S OUTHERN U NIVERSITY AND I NDIVIDUALLY ; 

### H AROLD 

### O DOM 

### , INDIVIDUALLY 

### ; E DWARD 

### G ANTT 

### , INDIVIDUALLY 

### ; AND 

### K ENNETH 

### W. J ACKSON 

### , INDIVIDUALLY 

### ,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (H-98-CV-2824)

_________________________

June 8, 20012

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

W. Sue Lefall sued the Board of Regents of Texas Southern University and cer t ain of its

o fficials for sex discrimination under title VII and for deprivati o n o f substantive and procedural due pro cess under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court entered summary judgme nt in favor of defendants, and Lefall appeals only under § 1983.

We have reviewed the briefs and applicable law and pertinent portions of the re cord and have heard the arguments of counsel. We conclude that Lefall has made no showing of any actions that colorably amount to a co nstitutional violation. Plainly, defendants took no action that can fairly be described as arbitrary and capricious, even assuming that the parties

were bound by the 1985 staff manual that permitted disciplinary action onl y for just cause. Moreover, Lefall received all process she was due to ensure her an oppportuni ty to vindicate her rights. Absent a valid constitutional claim, there is no need to visit the is sue o f qualified immunit y.

AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C I R

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that t his opinion should not be published and is not precedent except un der the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 99.2

**AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL PARTNERS, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the periodic report of American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Nicole S. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

|                    | (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                          |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|                    | (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the datesand for the periods indicated. |
|                    |                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| Date: November 13, 2002 | /s/ NICOLE S. WILLIAMS                                                                                                                                                                                   |   |
|                    |                                                                                                                                                                                                          |   |
|                    | **Nicole S. Williams Chief Financial Officer**                                                                                                                                                           |   |
|                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  |  |
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1402/2006

of 22 September 2006         

establishing a prohibition of fishing for anglerfish in ICES zone IV (Norwegian waters) by vessels flying the flag of the Netherlands

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy (1), and in particular Article 26(4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to common fisheries policy (2), and in particular Article 21(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2006 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.

Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. It shall be prohibited to retain on board, tranship or land such stock caught by those vessels after that date.

Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 September 2006.

For the Commission

Jörgen HOLMQUIST            

Director-General for Fisheries and Maritime Affairs

----

(1)OJ L 358, 31.12.2002, p. 59.

(2)OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 768/2005 (OJ L 128, 21.5.2005, p. 1).

(3)OJ L 16, 20.1.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1262/2006 (OJ L 230, 24.8.2006, p. 4).

----

ANNEX

----
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

GUILLERMO MOJARRO, Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

______________________

2013

- 3109

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection
Board in No. SF0353110827 -I- 1.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

G UILLERMO M OJARRO

, of Upland, California, pro se.

G REGG P ARIS Y ATES , Trial Attorney, Commercial Lit igation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for respondent. With him
on the brief were S TUART F. D ELERY , Acting Assistant
Attor ney General, J EANNE E. D AVIDSON , Director, and
K IRK T. M ANDARDT , Assistant Director.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it isO RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (R ADER

, Chief Judge, M OORE

, and
W ALLACH

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

October 15, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk
<Page>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.23

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                                SERVICE AGREEMENT

     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO SERVICE AGREEMENT (this "First Amendment") dated
this 1st day of December 2007 by and between Lincoln Benefit Life Company
("LBL") and Allstate Assignment Company ("AAC").

                                    RECITALS

     WHEREAS, LBL and AAC entered into that certain Service Agreement, dated
as of June 25, 2001 (the "Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, LBL and AAC desire to make certain amendments to the Agreement
as more particularly described herein.

                                    AGREEMENT

     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration and for the mutual
covenants set forth below, the parties hereto, intending legally to be bound,
hereby agree as follows:

     1.   LBL and AAC hereby agree to delete Article II. FEES FOR SERVICE of the
          Agreement and replace it with the following:

          II.  FEES FOR SERVICE

          AAC agrees to pay LBL $5000 per month for providing services performed
          by LBL under the terms of this agreement. AAC will remit a payment by
          the fifth workday of each month to LBL.

     2.   Unless expressly modified by this First Amendment, the terms and
          conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and
          effect.

     3.   This First Amendment shall be binding on the parties hereto, including
          their successors and assigns.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment
as of the day and year first set forth above.


LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

By:   /s/ Steven C. Verney
   ---------------------------
Name:    Steven C. Verney
     -------------------------
Title:   Treasurer
      ------------------------

<Page>

ALLSTATE ASSIGNMENT COMPANY


By:   /s/ Samuel H. Pilch
   -----------------------------------------
Name:    Samuel H. Pilch
     ---------------------------------------
Title:   Group Vice President and Controller
      --------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 8 (Thursday, January 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 1928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00370]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Neurological Sciences Training Initial Review 
Group; Neurological Sciences Training 3 Study Section.
    Date: February 5-6, 2024.
    Time: 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: New Orleans Marriott, 555 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA 
70130.
    Contact Person: Lataisia Cherie Jones, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NINDS/NIH, 6001 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852, 
301-496-9223, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eb878a9f8a8298828ac58184858e98ab858283c58c849d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aac6cbdecbc3d9c3cb84c0c5c4cfd9eac4c3c284cdc5dc">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: January 5, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-00370 Filed 1-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
ex10_5.htm










TWENTIETH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

















This Twentieth Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of November 18, 2011, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Employer") and John Hildebrandt ("Executive").












Recitals








	
A)  

	
On June 1, 2001 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive.













	
B)  

	
Said Employment Agreement has been amended on nineteen prior occasions;













	
C)  

	
Employer and Executive now desire to further amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow:

















Agreement







1. Section 2.1 of the Agreement which provides:








	
2.1  

	
Salary.  For Executive’s services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $256,020 during each year of the Employment Term.  Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer’s normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine.







 

 


is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2012, to provide as follows:








	
2.1  

	
Salary.  For Executive’s services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $310,000 during each year of the Employment Term.  Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer’s normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine.













	
2.  

	
All other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain unaltered and fully effective.

















Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.






















EXECUTIVE                                                                                     EMPLOYER


PRICESMART, INC.







John Hildebrandt                                                                           By:           







______________________                                                       Name:         Jose Luis Laparte                                







                            Its:           CEO and President
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6277]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. BURGESS:
       H.R. 6482.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Congress has the authority under Article I, Section 9, 
     Clause 7, ``No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in 
     Consequence of Appropriations made by Law.'' It is within 
     Congress' power to regulate the appropriation of money from 
     the Treasury and this bill is directly related to this 
     authority to ensure cost saving calculations are taken into 
     account into the budgeting and appropriation of such funds.
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARIO ANTONIO RAMON,

Appellant,

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00237-CR

Appeal from the

290th Judicial District Court

of Bexar County, Texas

Cause No. 2021CR5632

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2024.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of Aviva Petroleum Inc.


                                 Place of
Company                          Incorporation
-------                          -------------
Aviva Operating Company          Nevada
Aviva America, Inc.              Delaware
Neo Energy, Inc.                 Texas
Aviva Delaware Inc.              Delaware
Aviva Overseas Inc.              Delaware
Garnet Resources Corporation     Delaware
Garnet Pakistan Corporation      Delaware
Garnet Spain Corporation         Delaware
Garnet Turkey Corporation        Delaware
Garnet PNG Corporation           Delaware
Argosy Energy Incorporated       Delaware
Argosy Energy International      Utah limited partnership
Argosy Petroleum Company, SA     Colombia, South America
Garnet Resources Canada Ltd.     British Columbia
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2014-0585 Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-248-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

2.0 $ 170.00 $ 170.00 2 $ 340.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 340

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

5.0 $ 425.00 $ 425.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4985 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4985

To restore an opportunity for tribal economic development on terms that 
              are equal and fair, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2018

    Mr. Babin (for himself, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. Gosar, and Mr. 
   LaMalfa) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To restore an opportunity for tribal economic development on terms that 
              are equal and fair, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-
Coushatta Tribes of Texas Equal and Fair Opportunity Settlement Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    The Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribes of 
Texas Restoration Act (Public Law 100-89; 101 Stat. 666) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 301. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    ``Nothing in this Act shall be construed to preclude or limit the 
applicability of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et 
seq.).''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6121]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      PERMISSION FOR MEMBER TO BE ADDED AS COSPONSOR OF H.R. 2994

  Ms. BONAMICI. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to be added as a 
cosponsor to H.R. 2994, the Marine and Hydrokinetic Renewable Energy 
Promotion Act. The original sponsor is no longer in Congress.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentlewoman from Oregon?
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________
```