alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1616-E1617]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   PROHIBITING USE OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN FUNDS FOR PARTY 
                              CONVENTIONS

                                 ______
                                 

                               speech of

                          HON. BETTY McCOLLUM

                              of minnesota

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 19, 2012

  Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to H.R. 5912. This is 
a misguided bill that repeals public financing of our national 
political conventions and allows moneyed special-interests to complete 
their corporate buyout of America's electoral process.
  Public financing of both Democratic and Republican conventions, 
created in 1976 following the Watergate scandal, was designed to 
establish a safeguard against corruption in the political system by 
reducing the emphasis on fundraising in presidential campaigns and 
diminishing the influence of wealthy special interests. In recent 
years, the need to modernize the system for today's campaign 
environment has become evident, but the system remains as critical as 
ever to the integrity of our democracy--especially in the wake of the 
Supreme Court's Citizens United vs. FEC ruling.
  The disastrous Citizens United decision that unleashed nearly a 
billion dollars of corporate funding into the Presidential race has 
demonstrated how essential it is to restore and uphold the integrity of 
our elections. Passage of H.R. 5912 would only serve to further 
undermine this integrity by enabling secretive Super PACs and 
billionaires to take full control of our political conventions, a 
critical component of America's electoral process. Furthermore, public 
financing plays a vital role in helping state and local governments 
offset the costs associated with hosting national political 
conventions. These costs may include property taxes, parking 
accommodations, and local law enforcement funding. H.R. 5912 is unfair 
to the municipalities that have the honor of hosting these important 
national events.
  The financing system for political conventions must be repaired, not 
repealed, to better serve the interests of the American people and 
protect against corruption.
  I urge my colleagues to oppose this legislation.

[[Page E1617]]

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1593]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   IN REMEMBRANCE OF MRS. RUTH COYNE

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in honor of Mrs. Ruth Coyne, 
the former ``first lady'' of Brooklyn, Ohio.
  Ruth was the wife of John M. Coyne, the former mayor of Brooklyn. She 
attended Rhodes High School and met John at a dance at Our Lady of Good 
Council. They were married at Old Pete's Wayside Inn on November 30, 
1940. John went on to serve as mayor for an astounding 52 years, from 
1947 to 1999. Ruth provided support for her husband throughout the 
years and came to be loved by the community. The couple was married for 
72 years.
  Ruth is remembered fondly by everyone she encountered. Councilwoman 
Kathleen Pucci has said that, ``She exemplified grace, dignity and 
style. She genuinely cared about our community and its residents.''
  In addition to her role as ``first lady'', Ruth was a loving citizen 
and mother. She was the mother of four, grandmother of nine, and great-
grandmother of fifteen. She always put her family first.
  Mr. Speaker and colleagues, please join me in memory of Mrs. Ruth 
Coyne, a woman who spent her long life working for others, and who will 
be greatly missed by her family and the City of Brooklyn.

                          ____________________
```
#### Carrol Richard OLSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David R. McKUNE and Robert Stephan, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 93-3144.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Nov. 16, 1993.

Carrol Richard Olson, pro se.

Before MOORE, ANDERSON, and TACHA, Circuit Judges.

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner, Carrol Richard Olson, appeals the dismissal of his petition for writ of habe-as corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court dismissed the petition for failure to exhaust state remedies for nine of the more than twenty claims. On appeal, petitioner argues that all claims raised in the petition have been exhausted in state court. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.1

“[A] state prisoner bringing a federal ha-beas corpus action bears the burden of showing that he has exhausted available state remedies_” *Miranda v. Cooper,*967 F.2d 392, 398 (10th Cir.) (citing *Clonce v. Presley,*640 F.2d 271, 273 (10th Cir.1981)), *cert. denied,*- U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 347, 121 L.Ed.2d 262 (1992). Petitioner has not met that burden. Without specifying how each claim has been exhausted, petitioner simply states in his petition that he has exhausted all state remedies in state court. Petitioner makes the same blanket representation in response to respondents’ nonexhaustion defense and, again in his appellate brief. From our review of the record it appears that Olson may have exhausted six of the nine claims which the district court identified as unexhausted. At least three claims, however, do not appear to have been exhausted. Therefore the district court properly dismissed the petition. *See Rose v. Lundy,*455 U.S. 509, 522, 102 S.Ct. 1198, 1205, 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982).

*96We GRANT petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and his application for a certificate of probable cause. The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas is AFFIRMED.

1

. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Gammacan International Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Tovi Ben Zeev, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

Date:  February 11, 2005                                By: /s/ TOVI BEN ZEEV
                                                           ---------------------
                                                        Tovi Ben Zeev
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6639
PAUL H. NOE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. R. L. MCFADDEN; PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden; WADE NOBLES; S. HAYWOOD; KIM WHITE; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COE; NURSE CHAPMAN; DOCTOR PHILIP; COUNSELOR FORD; LIEUTENANT DODSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the U nited States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03139-D) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 11, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul H. Noe, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Paul H. Noe seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing some, but not all, of his claims raised in his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Noe seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Lisa Gopalakrishnan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 10, 2007 |  |  |  | /S/ LISA GOPALAKRISHNAN
|                   |  |  |  | Lisa Gopalakrishnan    
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification
will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 501 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 501

To require increased reporting regarding certain surgeries scheduled at 
medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2017

  Mrs. Dingell (for herself and Mr. Walberg) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require increased reporting regarding certain surgeries scheduled at 
medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VA Transparency Enhancement Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) Reports From Directors of Medical Facilities of the Department 
of Veterans Affairs.--Not later than 30 days after the end of each 
calendar quarter, each director of a medical facility of the Department 
of Veterans Affairs shall submit to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs a 
report regarding the following:
            (1) With respect to surgical infections--
                    (A) the number of patients who contracted an 
                infection as a result of a surgery performed at such 
                medical facility during the previous quarter; and
                    (B) a brief summary of each such case of infection.
            (2) With respect to cancelled or transferred surgeries--
                    (A) the number of surgeries scheduled to be 
                performed at the medical facility during the previous 
                quarter that were cancelled or transferred to another 
                medical facility;
                    (B) the reason each such surgery was cancelled or 
                transferred; and
                    (C) the number of additional days each such patient 
                had to wait for surgery because of cancellation or 
                transfer.
    (b) Reports From the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.--Not later than 
60 days after the end of each calendar quarter, the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs shall--
            (1) submit to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the 
        House of Representatives and the Senate the reports under 
        subsection (a) and a summary of such reports; and
            (2) publish on the website of the Department the summary 
        under paragraph (1) and the reports under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6242]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   RECOGNITION OF THE MINORITY LEADER

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Republican leader is 
recognized.

                          ____________________
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the ***

District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ERIC EVERETT MILLS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10244

D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00249-KJDCWH-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Kent J. Dawson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 18, 2013** 

San Francisco, California

Before: GRABER and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and TUNHEIM, District ***

Judge. 

 

Defendant Eric Everett Mills appeals from the district court’s imposition of a

sentence of 97 months’ imprisonment following his guilty plea for receipt of child

FILED

MAY 16 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2) & (b), and for possession of

child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). We affirm.

1. We review for plain error Defendant’s procedural objections to the

district court’s decision to vacate the possession conviction. See United States v.

Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010) ("Where, as here, a

defendant failed to object on the ground that the district court erred procedurally in

explaining and applying the [18 U.S.C.] § 3553(a) factors, we review only for plain

error."). The decision as to which conviction to vacate under United States v.

Davenport, 519 F.3d 940 (9th Cir. 2008), lies within the district court’s discretion. 

See United States v. Hector, 577 F.3d 1099, 1103–04 (9th Cir. 2009).

2. Defendant argues that the district court did not consider the § 3553(a)

factors. "Trial judges are presumed to know the law and to apply it in making their

decisions." Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639, 653 (1990), overruled on other

grounds by Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 609 (2002). Nothing in the record here

overcomes that presumption.

3. Nor did the district court commit plain error by failing to explain how the

§ 3553(a) factors applied. See Olano v. United States, 507 U.S. 725, 734 (1993)

(holding that, to constitute "plain" error, an error must be "obvious" or "clear").

Although district courts must consider the § 3553(a) factors, United States v.
3

Maier, 646 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 601 (2011), we have

never held that a district court must explain the specific application of those factors

apart from its explanation concerning the choice of an appropriate sentence. The

district court’s explanation here was careful and thorough.

4. The sentence at the low end of the Guidelines range is not substantively

unreasonable in this case. See generally United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984 (9th

Cir. 2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          90,854
<SECURITIES>                                    64,197
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,084
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,324
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               222,864
<PP&E>                                          25,714
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 244,281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,344
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                     199,903
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   244,281
<SALES>                                        136,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               137,118
<CGS>                                           69,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,978
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (2,835)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,612
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,518
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,094
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,094
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







The Board of Directors

Bedford Property Investors, Inc.:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-23687, 333-33643, 333-33795, 333-108908 and 333-112144) and the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 033-52375, 333-18215, 333-70681, 333-74707 and 333-115468) of Bedford Property Investors, Inc. of our report dated February 10, 2003, relating to the statements of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows of Bedford Property Investors, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002, and the 2002 information in Footnote A to the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Bedford Property Investors, Inc.



/s/ KPMG LLP



San Francisco, California

March 11, 2005
Exhibit 32.3

Certification of Chief Accounting Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007(the Report) of MCG Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John C. Wellons, the Chief Accounting Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    JOHN C. WELLONSName: John C. WellonsDate: April 30, 2007
From: "Higgins, Cortney" [Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]
Sent: 03/15/2011 08:58 PM AST To: Robertj Wayland Cc: Mary Johnson; Karen Thundiyil; Charlotte Bertrand Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EPA's EGU MACT Rule

Mar10_2011_Handout1.pdf Mar10_2011_Handout2.pdf

Hi Bob, Consistent with our EO, the handouts from this meeting are attached.

Regards,
Cortney

When: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:00 PM-1:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
Where: 10103 NEOB

Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustments.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Hewitt Strange, Podesta Group has requested this meeting.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





This 14th
day of August, 2008.











/s/ Stephen D.
      Barnhill, M.D.Stephen
      D. Barnhill, M.D.Chief
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial
  Officer