alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nicholas Hatzipavlou, Appellant.

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Danaher, Jr., J.), rendered May 29, 1990, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

Initially, we note that defendant’s challenge to the adequacy of his court-appointed interpreter was not preserved for review insofar as he failed to object or express any dissatisfaction at trial *(see, People v Duenas,*120 AD2d 978). In any event, there is nothing in the record to indicate that the interpreter was unable to, or that he failed to, properly translate for defendant *(see, supra).*Defendant’s contention that the People failed to establish a chain of custody for the introduction into evidence of the weapon allegedly in defendant’s possession is equally unavailing. The testimony of the officers involved sufficiently established a chain of custody *(see, People v Joy,*107 AD2d 938) and we also note that defendant’s counsel subsequently affirmatively stated that he had no objection to the weapon’s introduction into evidence *(see, People v Hurd,*160 AD2d 199, *lv denied*76 NY2d 789). As to defendant’s remaining contentions, they have been considered *970and found either to be unpreserved for review or rejected as lacking in merit.

Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Levine and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009(the
Report) of MCG Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stephen J. Bacica, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify,
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ STEPHEN J. BACICAName:

Stephen J. BacicaTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate

November 4, 2009
(OCTOBER 1, 2019–SEPTEMBER 30, 2020)

KENTUCKY STATE PROFILE | FISCAL YEAR 2020

65 PROJECTS

$42.3M TOTAL ARC 

INVESTMENT

$121.5M ADDITIONAL PRIVATE

INVESTMENTS

LEVERAGED

FISCAL YEAR 2020 INVESTMENT SNAPSHOT

ADDITIONAL PRIORITIES

invested to leverage natural and

$2.1M

cultural assets and cultivate

leadership and community capacity

in Appalachian Kentucky

FISCAL YEAR 2020 INVESTMENT PRIORITIES

2,300 JOBS CREATED 

OR RETAINED

3,500 STUDENTS AND 

WORKERS TRAINED 

AND EDUCATED

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

$27.9M

invested in Kentucky’s critical 

infrastructure development, including 

broadband, transportation, and 

water/wastewater systems

READY WORKFORCE

invested to increase the education, 

$8.2M

knowledge, skills, and health of 

Kentucky’s Appalachian residents 

to work and succeed

ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES

invested in entrepreneurial strategies 

$4.2M

to strengthen the economy in 

Appalachian Kentucky

APPALACHIAN REGIONAL COMMISSION | LEARN MORE: ARC.GOV/KENTUCKY

FY 2020 COUNTY ECONOMIC STATUS IN KENTUCKY

Levels of

Economic Status

Distressed County

At-Risk County

Transitional County

Competitive County

Attainment County
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of LiquidmetalTechnologies (the “Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,2004, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/   Tony Chung                 |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Tony Chung, Vice President of Finance |
| December 20, 2004                |

 

----
EXHIBIT
31.3
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, Larry
Hannappel, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Century Casinos, Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date:
April 15, 2005
 
 
 ________________________________
 Larry
Hannappel
 Senior
Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
Filed 10/3/16 P. v. Neuman CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.111.5.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ALAN R USSELL NEUMAN,

Defendant and Appellant. 2d Crim. No. B2 75620

(Super. Ct. No. 2014032494 )

( Ventura County)

Alan Russell Neuman appeals his conviction by plea for failure to register

as a sex offender after an address change (Pen. Code, § 290 .013, subd. (a) ) 1 and

admission that he suffered a prior strike conviction ( §§ 667, subds. (c)(1) & (e)(1);

1170.12 , subds. (a)(1) & (c)(1) )

. The trial court granted a Romero motion ( People v.

Superior Court ( Romero ) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497) to strike the prior strike conviction,

suspended imposition of sentence, and granted appellant 36 months probation with 164

days county jail.

We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel’s

examination of the record, counsel filed an opening br ief in which no issues were raised.

On August 15, 2016 , we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally

submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. We have received no response

from appellant.

1 All statutory references are to the Penal Code.2 We have reviewed the ent ire record a nd are satisfied that appellant’ s

attorney has fully complied with h is responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist.

( People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443 .) The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

YEGAN, J.

We concur :

GILBERT, P. J.

PERREN, J.Henry J. Walsh, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director, Richard B. Lennon, Staff

Attorney, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance by Respondent.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1116-1117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00232]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3600-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Louisiana (FEMA-3600-EM), dated September 27, 2023, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued November 30, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an emergency declaration for 
the

[[Page 1117]]

State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following area 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
event declared an emergency by the President in his declaration of 
September 27, 2023.

    St. Mary Parish for emergency protective measures, including 
direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program 
limited to temporary measures that address reduced water treatment 
capability due to saltwater intrusion resulting from low water 
levels of the Mississippi River for no more than 135 days from the 
date of declaration.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-00232 Filed 1-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. 7871.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 9, 1939.

Samuel O. Clark, Jr., J. P. Wenchel, Sewall Key, Leslie H. Rushbrook, J. Louis Monarch, and Arnold Raum, all of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Paul E. Shorb, of Washington, D. C., and John Thomas Smith, of New York City, for respondent.

Before HICKS and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This matter came on to be heard on the motion and the stipulation of the respective parties hereto by their counsel to enter an order vacating the judgment of the United States Board of Tax Appeals and to remand the cause with instructions to the United States Board of Tax Appeals *996to enter a judgment showing an additional deficiency in- tax, inclusive of interest, due from General Motors Corporation for the calendar year 1926 in the sum of $3,500,-000.

Upon due consideration of the said motion and stipulation it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the United States Board of Tax Appeals be, and the same is hereby vacated, in so far as it affects the year 1926, with instructions to the United States Board of Tax Appeals to enter a judgment showing an additional deficiency in tax, inclusive of interest, due from General Motors Corporation, for the calendar year 1926, in the sum of $3,500,000.

It is further ordered by this court that a certified copy of this order be forthwith transmitted to the United States Board of Tax Appeals.
Exhibit 10.2



                                --------------

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

                                --------------



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-73898 and 333-12208) of Terra Networks, S.A. of
our report dated February 15, 2005, relating to the financial statements of
Terra Networks Espana, S.A.U., which appears in this Form 20-F.


April 14, 2005




BDO Audiberia Auditores,S.L.
#### Harwood Rosser and Augustus Fitch, Jr., *Appellants,*v. J. R. Goodwin and Vetter Goodwin, his wife, *Appellees.*

Decision filed July 13, 1915.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Duval County; D. A> Simmons, Judge.

*152Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted to the court at a former term thereof, upon the transcript of the record of the decrees aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decrees; it is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decrees of the Circuit Court be and the same 'are hereby affirmed; it is further ordered by the court that the appellees do have and recover of and from the appellants their costs by them in this behalf expended, 'which costs are taxed at the sum of $......, all of which is ordered to be certified to the court below.
#### Lester H. JETT et al., Appellants, v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 11539.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

July 11, 1939.

C. H. O. Leimbrock, of Marshall, Mo., for appellants.

Gardner Smith, of Kansas City, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal docketed and dismissed with costs, on motion of appellee and certificate of clerk of United States District Court.
Exhibit 31.01**CERTIFICATION**I, Bruce L. Cleland, Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc., the general partner ofCampbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P. (the “Fund”), do hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Fund; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland          Bruce L. Cleland    Chief Executive Officer    March 31, 2006  
E 2
EXHIBIT 10.2


                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the use of this Annual Report (Form 20-F) of Frisco Bay Industries
Ltd. of our report dated May 11, 2001 with respect to the Company's consolidated
financial statements for the year ended January 31, 2001.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) pertaining to the Frisco Bay Industries Ltd. Stock Incentive Plan of Frisco
Bay Industries Ltd. of our report dated May 11, 2001, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Frisco Bay Industries Ltd
included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended January 31, 2001.


                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

                                        Chartered Accountants

Montreal Canada,
July 5, 2002
#### MAJORS et al. v. DENNIS.

No. 36161.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 25, 1954.

*768Champion & Champion, Ardmore, for plaintiffs in error.

George & George, Ardmore, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment was entered for plaintiff in an action on a contract and thereafter on February 26, 1953, the assigned judge overruled a motion for new trial and ■extended the time in which to make and serve a case-made for 60 days. This order was entered under the power of his assignment and was valid. Thereafter on April .23, 1953, and on June 16, 1953, the assigned judge éntered two orders1 extending the time in which to make and serve case-made. These orders were issued after the date of the assignment had expired and were therefore void. Shoumake v. Mantooth, 203 Okl. 168, 219 P.2d 202.

The time in which to make and ■serve case-made after the 15 days allowed by statute can only.be authorized by:a valid order and the consent of the parties to’ an. -extension is of no effect without such valid order. Horner v. Christy, 4 Okl. 553, 46 P. 561; Bettis v. Cargile, 23 Okl. 301, 100 P. 436; McCoy v. McCoy, 27 Okl. 371, 112 P. 1040; J. W. Ripey & Son v. Art Wall Paper Mill, 27 Okl. 600, 112 P. 1119.

Defendants argue that by reason of 20 O.S.1953 Supp. § 103.1 an assigned judge is now authorized to enter orders of extension and that this enactment should be construed retroactively. Regardless of the effect of this act it could not apply to the facts involved in this case for the reason that the judge was not within the district when the orders were signed.

Appeal dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theAnnual Report of National RV Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,Bradley C. Albrechtsen, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,and Thomas J. Martini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

**(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and**

**(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.**
| /s/ Bradley C. Albrechtsen |   | /s/ Thomas J. Martini     |
|----------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
| Bradley C. Albrechtsen     |   | Thomas J. Martini         |
| Chief Executive Officer    |   | Chief Financial Officer   |
| And President              |   | (Principal Accounting and |
| March 29, 2007             |   | Financial Officer)        |
|                       |   | March 29, 2007            |

 

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7940
KENNETH B. HAMILTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES B. HUNT, JR.; FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN, JR.; D. G. LUTHER, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-95-958-5-BO) Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 7, 1996 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth B. Hamilton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hamilton v. Hunt , No. CA-95-958-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED