alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11/15/2013

Requesting Approval to Use New Technology for Handling 

Regulated Garbage

Anyone wishing to use new technology in the handling of regulated garbage 

must send a signed letter requesting approval of the new technology to the 

APHIS Administrator at the following address:

Administrator

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

c/o AQI VMO Director

USDA-APHIS-PPQ Field Operations 

2150 Centre Ave Bldg B

Fort Collins, CO 80526

Alternatively, a signed letter requesting approval to use new technology on 

regulated garbage may be sent to the APHIS Administrator by email at the 

following address:

ppq.ops.regulated.garbage@aphis.usda.gov

In the letter, in addition to the actual request, include the following 

information:

1. A complete and accurate description of the new technology.

2. A detailed description of the equipment including information regarding 

the equipment’s ability to generate recording data to support the 

effectiveness of the equipment in mitigating for foreign plant and animal 

pests and diseases.

3. Scientific evidence that the equipment is capable of preventing the 

introduction and dissemination of foreign animal and plant pests and 

diseases via regulated garbage.

4. Scientific literature supporting the new technology as capable of 

eliminating foreign animal disease agents and plant pests in regulated 

garbage and preventing the introduction and dissemination of foreign 

animal and plant pests and diseases via regulated garbage.
**Exhibit24.1**

 

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

 

 

 

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESEPRESENTS, that AFFINITY GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),and each of the undersigned directors of the Company, hereby constitutes andappoints Stephen Adams, Michael Schneider and Thomas F. Wolfe, and each of them(with full power to each of them to act alone), its/his true and lawfulattorney-in-fact and agent, for it/him and on its/his behalf in its/his name,place and stead, in any and all capacities to sign, execute, affix its/his sealthereto and file the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2004 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,including any amendment or amendments thereto, with all exhibits and any alldocuments required to be filed with respect thereto with any regulatoryauthority.

 

There is hereby granted tosaid attorneys, and each of the, full power and authority to do and performeach and every act and thing, requisite and necessary to be done in respect ofthe foregoing as fully as it/he or itself/himself might or could do ifpersonally present, thereby ratifying and confirming all that saidattorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to bedone by virtue hereof.

 

This Power of Attorney maybe executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original,but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrumentand any of the undersigned directors may execute this Power of Attorney bysigning any such counterpart.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AFFINITYGROUP HOLDING, INC. has caused this Power of Attorney to be executed in itsname by its President and Chief Executive Officer as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2005.

 
|   |   |   | AFFINITY  GROUP, INC. |
|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------|
|   |   |   |                  |   |
|   |   |   |                  |   |
|   |   |   | By:                   | /s/  Michael A. Schneider |
|   |   |   |                  | Michael A. Schneider,  President and |
|   |   |   |                  | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----

 

The undersigned directors of AFFINITY GROUP,INC., a Delaware corporation, have hereunto set their hands as of the 28thday of February 2005.

 

 

 

 

 
| /s/ Stephen Adams        |   | /s/ Joe B. McAdams    |
|--------------------------|--------|-----------------------|
| Stephen Adams            |   | Joe B. McAdams        |
|                     |   |                  |
| /s/ Michael A. Schneider |   | /s/ David B. Garvin   |
| Michael A. Schneider     |   | David B. Garvin       |
|                     |   |                  |
| /s/ Wayne Boysen         |   | /s/ David Frith-Smith |
| Wayne Boysen             |   | David Frith-Smith     |
|                     |   |                  |
| /s/ John Ehlert          |   | /s/ George Parker     |
| John Ehlert              |   | George Parker         |
|                     |   |                  |
| /s/ Mark J. Boggess      |   |                  |
| Mark J. Boggess          |   |                  |

 

 

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended  Quarterly Report of Whistler  Investments,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Holly Roseberry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge:  (1) The Report fully  complies
with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

                                                /s/ Holly Roseberry
                                                ---------------------
                                                Holly Roseberry
                                                Chief Executive Officer

  July 28, 2004
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4801 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to appoint a representative from 

the Department of Transportation to the board of trustees of the Gateway Program Development Corporation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2018 

Mr. GOTTHEIMER (for himself and Mr. KING of New York) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to appoint a 

representative from the Department of Transportation 

to the board of trustees of the Gateway Program Development Corporation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Get on Board to Fix 

5 the Tunnel Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT OF REPRESENTATIVE. 

7 Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 

8 of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall appoint 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4801 IH

1 a representative of the Department of Transportation to 

2 the board of trustees of the Gateway Program Develop3 ment Corporation. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
Map Created: October 2009.

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1990 Census, STF3A.

College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 1990

(County Rates)

A college completion rate is the percentage of adults, 25 years 

and over, completing 4 years of college or more. The map uses 

natural breaks in the distribution to organize the data into groups 

of common values. 

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

3.7% - 9.7% 

9.8% - 15.1% 

15.2% - 24.1% 

24.2% - 41.7% 

Completion Rate 

U.S. average = 20.3%

Appalachian average = 14.2%

(Natural Breaks Classification)
#### MARSHALL v. STATE.

No. A-11877.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Dec. 10, 1953.

O. C. Lassiter, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lewis J. Bick-ing, *County*Atty., Tulsa *County,*Tulsa, for defendant in error.

POWELL, Presiding Judge.

Here the defendant was charged in the court of common pleas of Tulsa County with the unlawful possession of one-half pint of intoxicating liquor, with the intention to sell.

The possession of such quantity of liquor would not have been unlawful if for the personal use of the accused. Tit. 37 O.S. 1951 § 82; Thomas v. State, 70 Okl.Cr. 404, 106 P.2d 836. On trial the State would have -been required to produce competent evidence tending to show such intent. But the accused entered a plea of guilty, and was by the Court fined $75, and costs, and sentenced to serve thirty days in the county jail. Appeal has been perfected to this court, but brief in support of the petition in error has not been filed.

We find no error in the record, and the case is affirmed.

JONES and BRETT, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1394

ROBERT E. GREEN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE; BALTIMOREPOLICE DEPARTMENT; SOD DECOY SQUAD; CARL STAMBAUGH, Officer, and other members of the SOD Decoy Squad, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-00- 711-MJG) Submitted: May 31, 2000 Decided: June 20, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert E. Green, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. William Rowe Phelan, Jr., OFFICE OF THE CITY SOLICITOR, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Robert E. Green, Sr. appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court but modify the court’s order toprovide that the dismissal of Green’s complaint is without prejudice. See Green v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore , No. CA00-711-MJG (D. Md. Mar. 21 & 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 07

- 17

- 00200

- CV

Endoscopy GP, LLC and

Amarillo Endoscopy Center, L.P.

Appellant s

v.

AmeriPride Services, Inc.

Appellee §

§

§

§ From the County Court at Law No

. 2

of Potter County

July 17, 2017

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated July 1 7 , 2017, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be set aside and this cause be

remanded to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement

of the parties.

It is further ordered that all costs on appeal should be taxed against the parties

incurring them.

It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that inasmuch as the judgment of the

trial court be set aside at the parties’ request, no motion for r ehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

. It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 2628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00635]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Initial Review Group; Training and Workforce Development 
Study Section--C Training and Workforce Development Study Section C 
(TWD-C)--Review of B2B, B2D and IRACDA.
    Date: February 22, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of 
General Medical Sciences, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Sonia Ivette Ortiz-Miranda, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of 
General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center 
Drive, MSC 6200 Bethesda, Maryland 20892, 301-402-9448, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dcafb3b2b5bdf2b3aea8b5a6f1b1b5aebdb2b8bd9cb2b5b4f2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4d7cbcacdc58acbd6d0cdde89c9cdd6c5cac0c5e4cacdcc8ac3cbd2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.859, 
Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 9, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-00635 Filed 1-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)


Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of the
undersigned  officers of Wien Group, Inc., a New York corporation (the Company),
do hereby  certify with respect to the  Quarterly  Report of the Company on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended  September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities &
Exchange Commission (the 10-QSB Report) that:

(1)      the 10-QSB  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of sections
         13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,

(2)      the information  contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: November 12, 2004                       /S/ STEPHEN S. WIEN
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               STEPHEN S. WIEN,
                                               Chief Executive Officer &
                                               Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING

AND
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR 15D-14(B)

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Legend Oil and Gas, Ltd. (the Company) for the three months ended
June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marshall Diamond-Goldberg, as principal executive officer of the Company, and I, James Vandeberg, as principal accounting and
financial officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                           |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------
|/s/ Marshall Diamond-Goldberg              |  |  |  | Date: August 12, 2011
|Marshall Diamond-Goldberg                  |  |  |  |                      
|Principal Executive Officer                |  |  |  |                      
|                                           |  | 
|/s/ James Vandeberg                        |  |  |  | Date: August 12, 2011
|James Vandeberg                            |  |  |  |                      
|Principal Accounting and Financial Officer |  |  |  |                      

The certifications filed under this Exhibit 32.1 are not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Legend Oil and Gas, Ltd. under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or
after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language contained in any such filing, except to the extent that Legend Oil and Gas, Ltd. specifically incorporates it by reference.
##### 



EXHIBIT 8.1
 
 
    
 Triad Automobile Receivables Trust 2007-B
  Depositor Triad Class A-1 Notes Class A-2a Notes Class A-2b Notes, Class A-3a Notes Class A-3b Notes, Class A-4a Notes Class A-4b Notes, Notes Trust Indenture Indenture Trustee Certificate Original Trust
Agreement Trust Agreement Owner Trustee
 Issuance
Date




---



##### 



Commission Act
 Prospectus Supplement Base Prospectus
   Sale and Servicing Agreement
   Transaction Documents




---



##### 



Code IRS




---



##### 



Very truly yours,/s/ Kirkland & Ellis LLPKIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000910632
<NAME>                        ICON Cash Flow Partners L.P. Six

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            125,260
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  18,939,197
<ALLOWANCES>                                      281,062
<INVENTORY>                                         7,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                      0
<PP&E>                                         19,100,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,967,204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 44,487,621
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                                0
<BONDS>                                        23,379,315
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                     17,884,454
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   44,487,621
<SALES>                                         5,993,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                6,162,370
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                3,476,847
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   52,997
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,164,887
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      467,639
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        1.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1.22
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6675

JAKE HENDRIX,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; DIRECTOR MICHAEL MOORE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. 

(4:14-cv-00971-JMC)

Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 28, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jake Hendrix, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jake Hendrix seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge 

recommended that relief be denied and advised Hendrix that failure 

to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive 

appellate review of a district court order based upon the 

recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate 

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review 

of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been 

warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 

766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 

U.S. 140 (1985). Hendrix has waived appellate review by failing 

to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. 

Accordingly, we deny Hendrix’s motion to appoint counsel, deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED