alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Exhibit 12.1
|------------



|Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of  Title 18, United States Code)
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections  (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each  of the undersigned officers of
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A. de C.V., a foreign  corporation (the Company), does
hereby certify, to such officers knowledge,  that:
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|The Annual Report on form 20-F
      for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the Form 20-F) of the
      Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form
      20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated: June 27, 2003 |  | /s/Carlos Salazar Lomelin   
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|                     |  | Carlos Salazar Lomelin      
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer     
|                     |  |                             
|Dated: June 27, 2003 |  | /s/ Hector Trevino Gutierrez
|                     |  | Hector Trevino Gutierrez    
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer     



|A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coca-Cola  FEMSA,
S.A. de C.V. and will be retained by Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A. de C.V. and furnished to the
Securities and  Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JULIAN VALDEZ-ARAGON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-10475

D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00089-GMN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 17, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Julian Valdez-Aragon appeals from the 108-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)(viii). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

JUL 27 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-10475

Valdez-Aragon contends that the district court failed to appreciate its

discretion to vary downward from the Guidelines range based on the 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) sentencing factors. This contention is unpersuasive. See United States v.

Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 996 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc) (rejecting claim of error where

the district judge “gave no indication that he felt bound by the Guidelines range or

bound to treat the Guidelines sentence as presumptively reasonable”).

Valdez-Aragon also contends that his sentence is substantively

unreasonable. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the section 3553(a)

sentencing factors, the sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United

States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).

AFFIRMED.
#### Andy R. BEASLEY, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12034.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Oct. 6, 1954.

Hegel Branch, Duncan, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

JONES, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction sustained by Andy R. Beasley in the County Court of Stephens County wherein he was sentenced to serve 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $50 and costs upon a plea of guilty to the charge of illegal possession of intoxicating liquors.

No motion to withdraw the plea of guilty was made either before or after sentence was pronounced and counsel has wholly failed to point out any legal cause that would justify an appellate court in interfering with the judgment and sentence.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment and sentence of the County Court of Stephens County be and the same is hereby affirmed.

POWELL, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KIM DAVID MARCH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 128 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Published Opinion and Order of the Superior Court at No. 530 MDA 2016, at 154 A.3d 803 (Pa. Super. 2017) entered on January 26, 2017, reversing and remanding the Order Entered of the Berks County Court of

Common Pleas at No. CP

- 06

- CR

0005650

- 2015 entered on March 3,

2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED . The Superior Court’s order is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED

to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of this Court’s decision in

Commonwealth v. Myers , __ A.3d __, 7 EAP 2016, 2017 WL 3045867 (Pa. July 19,

2017) and the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Birchfield v. North Dakota

, __

U.S. __, 136 S.Ct. 2160 (2016).
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Mark Meller, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.





                                            Date: November 19, 2008



                                            By /s/ Mark Meller
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Mark Meller
                                            President, Chief Executive Officer
                                            and Principal Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1580]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. BARBARA LEE

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Ms. LEE of California. Mr. Speaker, I was not present for rollcall 
votes 585-586. Had I been able to vote, I would have voted ``yes'' on 
585 and ``no'' on 586.

                          ____________________
```
# Asthma

2009 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Data

Next Table

Age (years) 15-34

Characteristic† All ages Total Children

Age <18 Adults

Age 18+ 0 - 4 5 -

14 15 - 34 15 -

19 20 - 24 25 - 34 35 -

64 65+ Total: 39,930 10,196 29,734 1,668 6,534 12,471 3,124 3,732 5 ,615 14,972 4,284 Male 18,521 6,210 12,311 1,062 4,019 6,002 1,692 1,798 2 ,512 5,792 1,646 Female 21,409 3,986 17,423 607 2,515 6,469 1,433 1,934 3 ,103 9,180 2,638

White Non-Hispanic: 26,091 5,056 21,035 675 3,143 8,192 1, 925 2,529 3,738 10,689 3,392 Male 11,711 3,076 8,636 445 1,951 3,861 989 1,247 1,625 4 ,143 1,311 Female 14,379 1,980 12,399 231 1,192 4,331 936 1,282 2,1 13 6,546 2,080

Black Non-Hispanic: 5,974 2,300 3,675 479 1,435 1,875 604 5 00 772 1,882 304 Male 2,860 1,327 1,533 232 881 908 334 170 404 743 95 Female 3,114 973 2,141 246 553 967 269 329 368 1,139 208

Other Non-Hispanic: 2,589 789 1,800 118 553 842 195* 278 369 819 258 Male 1,339 541 798 94 356 463 133* 142* 188 326 99* Female 1,250 248 1,002 24* 197 378 62* 135* 181 493 159

Hispanic: 5,276 2,051 3,225 396 1,404 1,563 401 426 736 1,582 331 Male 2,610 1,266 1,344 290 830 769 235 239 295 580 140 Female 2,666 785 1,881 106 573 794 165 187 441 1,002 191 Table 1-1 Lifetime Asthma Population Estimates -- in thousand s by Age, United States: National Health Interview Su rvey, 2009 

## Page 1 of 1 CDC

- Asthma

- Table 1

- 1

- Lifetime Asthma Population Estimates in thousands b y Age,

...

10/22/2012 http://www.cdc.gov/asthma/nhis/09/table1

- 1.htm
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Colony RIH Holdings, Inc. and Resorts International Hotel and Casino, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph P. Weis, Senior Vice President Finance/CFO and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|/S/    JOSEPH P. WEIS                                            
|                                                                 
|Joseph P. Weis                                                   
|Senior Vice President Finance/CFO and Principal Financial Officer



August 13, 2003
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6235]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             H O U S E  O F  R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S

Vol. 158

WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2012

No. 129
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 4

- 0 0 455

- C V

Style: Phillippe Tanguy, 13500 Air Express, LLC and 13500 Air Express, LP

v William G. West, as Chapter 7 Trustee of Richard Davis, Debtor

Date motion filed * : April 13 , 201 5

Type of motion: Motion to Strike Purported Appearance of Receiver Eva Engelhart as a

Party to Appeal for Lack of Standing; Motion to Disqualify Receiver

Due to Bias

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of prior extensions: Current Due date:

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

 T he Court will not grant ad ditional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of

____________________________________________ Date: April 30, 2015
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6235]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 PRAYER

  The Chaplain, the Reverend Patrick J. Conroy, offered the following 
prayer:
  God of all Creation, we give You thanks for giving us another day.
  On this day, the people's House concludes its business. Members 
return to their congressional districts. An election to determine those 
who would serve this Nation as Members of Congress lies before us all.
  There are many energies which divide this House. There are many 
voices throughout our Nation vying for the attention of any who would 
listen.
  Please bless our Nation and those who leave this Chamber for the 
oncoming and ongoing campaign. Grant that there be more light than 
heat, more charity than enmity, more graciousness than ugliness, more 
wisdom than ignorance. Our great Nation has perdured for over two 
centuries, with many fits and starts, but many triumphs as well.
  In the weeks that come, may Your grace descend upon all citizens 
engaged in the affairs of our time. May we be mindful of needs beyond 
our own and united in a commitment to work together for a better future 
for these United States.
  Bless us this day and every day, and may all that is done be for Your 
greater honor and glory.
  Amen.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

                    In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Colony RIH Holdings, Inc. and Resorts International Hotel and Casino, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Audrey Oswell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                    1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                    2.     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ AUDREY OSWELL                                       |
|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                         |
| **Audrey Oswell President and Chief Executive Officer** |

 

 

November 14,2002
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7367

NATHANIEL HAMPTON JONES, a/k/a Nathaniel Hampton, a/k/a Nathaniel Jones, a/k/a Nathaniel H.

Jones,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM DAVIS, Warden of Lee Correctional Institution; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General

of the State of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-97-2299-2-13AJ)

Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 18, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel Hampton Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Jones v. Davis, No. CA-97-2299-2-13AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 3,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.3.6

 

BIO-REFERENCE LABORATORIES

 

AMENDMENT NO. 6

 

TO

 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

WITH SAM SINGER

 

AMENDMENT NO. 6 dated as of October , 2009 to an AGREEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT dated as of May 1, 1997 between Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the “Company”) and Sam Singer, its Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (the “Employee”); as amended on November 1, 2002 (Amendment No. 1); on January 7, 2004 (Amendment No. 2); on December 18, 2007 (Amendment No. 3); on March 4, 2008 (Amendment No. 4); and on September 18, 2008 (Amendment No. 5); (the original Agreement of Employment and the Five Amendments collectively referred to as the “Employment Agreement”);

 

WITNESSETH:

 

WHEREAS the parties previously executed the Employment Agreement providing for the employment by the Company of the Employee as its Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and

 

WHEREAS the Employment Agreement is currently due to expire on October 31, 2010 and would be automatically extended at the end of each Company fiscal year for an additional one year term unless the Company elected on a timely basis not to extend the term, but the Employee has the right to terminate the Employment Agreement effective on January 1 of any calendar year commencing January 1, 2010 on not less than 90 days prior written notice; and

 

1











 

WHEREAS the parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement to fix the Expiration Date as herein set forth:

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein and intended to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:

 

A.            “Term of Employment”. The “Expiration Date” of the Employment Agreement shall be the close of business on March 15, 2011.

 

B.            “2. Renewal”. This Section is deleted in its entirety so that the Expiration Date set forth in A above is no longer subject to renewal and the Employee no longer has the right to terminate the Employment Agreement. The Employment Agreement shall expire at the close of business on March 15, 2011.

 

C.            Other Provisions. Except for the above changes, the parties hereto hereby reaffirm each provision of the Employment Agreement as of the date hereof.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have each duly executed this Amendment No. 6 to the Employment Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

 

	
 
    	
COMPANY:
    
	
 
    	
Bio-Reference   Laboratories, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By   
    	
/s/   Marc Grodman M.D.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Marc   Grodman M.D.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
President
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Duly   Authorized
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
EMPLOYEE:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
/s/   Sam Singer
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Sam   Singer
    


 

2
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5863]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following 
communication from the Speaker:

                                               Washington, DC,

                                               September 12, 2012.
       I hereby appoint the Honorable Ann Marie Buerkle to act as 
     Speaker pro tempore on this day.
                                                  John A. Boehner,
     Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                          ____________________
```
Order entered September 5, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00099
- CV
WILLIAM DREXEL AND S ANDY DREXEL, Appellant s V. TOLL BROTHERS, INC. AND TOLL DALLAS TX LLC, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296
- 03255
- 2012



### O RDER Before the Court is appellees’ September 4, 2018 second unopposed motion for extension
of time to file brief

. We GRANT the m otion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than October 9, 2018. We caution appellees that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
#### Lazarus’s Appeal.

Mr. Justice Paxson

delivered the opinion of the courtj January 22d 1877.

The decree of the court below having been reversed upon the appeal of William Moss *et al., ante*264, it becomes unnecessary to discuss the case upon this appeal.

The appeal is dismissed at the costs of the appellant.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of APP Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard J. Tajak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 12, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ RICHARD J. TAJAK   
|                   |  |  |  | Richard J. Tajak       
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification
will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6000]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. BACA:
       H.R. 6395.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution.
```