alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1646]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE CREATION OF THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRADE 
                             REPRESENTATIVE

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. DAVE CAMP

                              of michigan

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. CAMP. Mr. Speaker, fifty years ago this October, Congress 
directed the President to appoint a Special Representative for Trade 
Negotiations to lead the Administration's efforts to expand global 
trade. As a result, for the past 50 years, the U.S. Trade 
Representative has led the Executive Branch in aggressively opening 
markets to American-made goods and services and promoting economic 
growth and job creation through trade. USTR's leadership has 
contributed in significant ways to the tremendous economic growth that 
the United States enjoyed over the past 50 years and firmly established 
our global economic leadership.
  Across Administrations, USTR has maintained an admirable bipartisan 
and close working relationship with Congress. I've always said that the 
very best people become the U.S. Trade Representative. The 50-year 
history of USTR demonstrates that the men and women who have served as 
the U.S. Trade Representative are strategic thinkers and tough 
negotiators--the kind of intelligent, can-do people who have 
demonstrated their ability to advance our trade agenda. And the 
dedicated USTR employees who serve with them also exhibit that 
intellectual rigor and high caliber. I'm proud of all that they have 
accomplished in opening markets and enforcing our rights under our 
trade agreements.
  USTR is uniquely nimble, lean, and effective. In a world that has 
changed dramatically over the past 50 years, USTR's small size, 
independence, and direct access to the President have been critical to 
its success. With these attributes intact, I am confident that USTR 
will continue to fulfill its mission effectively and commendably for 
the next 50 years.

                          ____________________
```
4. P. Written Comments Received During the 15-day
Comment Period.CSPA Comments on the 15-Day Notice August 25, 2008 Page 2 of 3

CSPA believes that it is critic ally important for ARB to clearly identify which products are subject to California’s very stringent VOC limits. Precise and unambiguous regulatory provisions benefit both ARB a nd the regulated entities.

Thus, CSPA supports the ARB’s decision to with draw the original proposed definition. In written comments CSPA filed on June 23, the A ssociation presents pr agmatic recommendations for producing clear demarcations for the products that ARB considers to be subject to the applicable VOC limits. CSPA commits to cont inue working cooperatively with ARB staff and

the other stakeholders to devel op a regulatory language that rem oves any potential ambiguity as to whether the ARB’s regulatory provis ions apply to specific products.

2. CSPA Supports ARB’s Action to Clarify the Definition of the Term “Floor Maintenance

Product .” 4

The modification to the definition for this produc t category removes any potential ambiguity as to applicable regulatory limits. During the past 20 years, ARB staff has done a commendable job developing a comprehensive set of precise definiti ons to ensure that no product is inadvertently subject to more than one VOC limit or more th an one set of regulations. In this case, the modification makes it unambiguously clear that the Floor Maintenance Product category is subject to provisions of the Consumer Products Regulation. CSPA strongl y believes that this type of clarity is necessary for companies to fully comply with ARB’s comprehensive regulatory requirements.

3. CSPA Supports ARB’s Action Clarifying the Applicability of the Regulatory Limit for the “Motor Vehicle Wash” Product Category

.

The modification to the Motor Vehicle Wash Product category in th e Table of Standards 5
unambiguously conveys ARB’s intent that the stringent new VOC limit applies only to the nonaerosol form of this particular product category. CSPA strongly believes th at this modification is both reasonable and necessary; accordingly, we support the ARB’s action on this issue.

Conclusion

CSPA thoroughly reviewed the Board Resolution a nd Modified Text issued subsequent to the

June 26 th Board Hearing and believes that it is consistent with the Board instructions to staff at the Hearing. Therefore, CSPA supports all of the modifica tions released for 15-day public

comment.

CSPA appreciates the opportunity to comment on these important proposed regulatory changes to the California Consumer Products Regulatio n. CSPA commends the ARB staff’s exemplary

efforts to ensure that all inte rested parties had an opportunity to participate in this open and transparent public effort to de velop amendments to California’ s very comprehensive Consumer

4 Cal. Code Regs. Title 17, Subchapt er 8.5, Article 4, § 94508(a)(58).

5 Id . at § 94509(a).
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 27, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00426-CR

JARVIS QUASHAWN WINDER, Appellant 

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 268th District Court 

Fort Bend County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 16-DCR-073124 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Appellant Jarvis Quashawn Winder appeals his conviction for aggravated 

robbery. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirement of 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of 

the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 

High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). 
2

 A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised 

of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford 

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant’s request, the 

record was provided to him. On October 3, 2018, appellant filed a pro se response 

to counsel’s brief. 

 We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s 

response, and agree with counsel that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without 

merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief 

would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. We are not to address the merits 

of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined 

there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 

827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 

 Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. 

 PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Hassan. 

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Author: Abt Associates Inc.

Date Created:

Date Modified: 5/26/2011

Purpose: This file contains the Producer Price Index for the chemical product manufacturing industry.

File Contents:

Worksheet Contents

Tables Contains time-scale PPI data for the chemical manufacturing industry from the Bureau of Labor Statistics; used to index 1998 

revenue data to 2007 data in the Facility Data file
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Industry:

Product:

Base Date:

Years:

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual

1998 134.1 134.2 134.0 133.9 134.3 134.7 135.1 134.9 136.0 135.0 134.9 134.9 134.7

1999 134.9 134.7 134.8 134.6 134.7 134.8 134.8 135.0 134.8 134.9 135.1 135.1 134.8

2000 135.3 135.1 135.2 135.1 135.4 136.2 135.8 135.8 135.9 136.2 136.6 137.5 135.8

2001 137.1 137.8 137.8 137.8 137.9 137.9 137.8 138.2 138.7 138.1 138.2 138.0 138.0

2002 138.4 138.2 138.6 138.5 138.7 139.4 139.4 139.3 139.4 139.4 139.6 139.9 139.1

2003 140.5 140.7 140.9 141.2 141.0 141.1 141.8 141.9 142.5 142.8 143.0 143.1 141.7

2004 143.6 144.3 144.4 145.4 145.6 145.5 146.6 147.8 149.9 150.5 151.3 151.8 147.2

2005 159.2 159.7 160.0 160.3 160.5 161.1 161.0 160.9 161.7 164.4 166.0 168.5 161.9

2006 168.8 170.6 170.2 171.3 171.7 171.2 172.9 173.2 174.2 174.1 175.8 176.7 172.6

2007 176.5 178.7 178.8 178.1 178.0 177.8 178.7 179.7 181.0 182.5 183.3 184.4 179.8

2008 190.3 192.1 192.2 194.0 196.9 199.2 204.0 206.6 207.7 211.9 211.2 211.1 201.4

2009 211.1 207.6 207.6 207.2 207.5 207.9 208.1 208.2 207.3 207.1 207.2 207.4 208.1

2010 207.1 208.0 206.3

198506

1998 to 2010

Producer Price Index Industry Data

Original Data Value

PCU325998325998

Other miscellaneous chemical product mfg.

Other miscellaneous chemical product mfg.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 6, 2010 (02:13:49 PM)
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to



Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the
Report) of MCG Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bryan J. Mitchell, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify,
to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    BRYAN J. MITCHELLName:  Bryan J. Mitchell Date:    August 8, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4840 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4840

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2018

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 567 East Franklin Street in Oviedo, Florida, as the ``Sergeant First 
           Class Alwyn Crendall Cashe Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT FIRST CLASS ALWYN CRENDALL CASHE POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 567 East Franklin Street in Oviedo, Florida, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant First Class Alwyn Crendall Cashe Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
First Class Alwyn Crendall Cashe Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6058]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION REFERRED

  A joint resolution of the Senate of the following title was taken 
from the Speaker's table and, under the rule, referred as follows:

       S.J. Res. 44. Joint resolution granting the consent of 
     Congress to the State and Province Emergency Management 
     Assistance Memorandum of Understanding; to the Committee on 
     Foreign Affairs.

                          ____________________
```
#### Norma R. FALIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services; Larry Jackson, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Social Services, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-2386.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued May 5, 1992.

Decided Sept. 30, 1993.

Martin Douglas Wegbreit, Client Centered Legal Services of Southwest Virginia, Inc., Castlewood, VA, argued, for appellant.

William Markley Reinhart, Asst. Regional Counsel, Office of the Gen. Counsel, Dept, of Health & Human Services, Philadelphia, PA, argued (Eileen Bradley, Chief Counsel, Region III, Michael Leonard, Supervisory Asst. Regional Counsel, Office of the Gen. Counsel, Dept, of Health & Human Services, Philadelphia, PA, Debra J. Prillaman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Richmond, VA, on brief), for Federal appellee.

Pamela M. Reed, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, argued (Mary Sue Terry, Atty. Gen. of Va., on brief), for State appellee.

Before WIDENER, Circuit Judge, SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge, and KAUFMAN, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

We have considered. the record in this case, the briefs of the parties and oral argument and are of opinion that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed.

Accordingly, we affirm on the well-reasoned opinion of the district court. *Falin v. Sullivan,*776 F.Supp. 1097 (E.D.Va.1991).

*AFFIRMED.*
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. KOCH BUTCHER SUPPLY CO.

No. 439 Orig.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

June 5, 1939.

Robert B. Watts, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Robert E. Rosenwald, of Kansas City, Mo, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent ordered to cease and desist from doing certain things and to take certain affirmative action, etc., on petition for «enforcement of order of Labor Board.
[Cite as State v. King, 2013-Ohio-775.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

BUTLER COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, : 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2012-04-071 

: D E C I S I O N

 - vs - 3/4/2013 

: 

 

BRYANT M. KING, : 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. CR2011-08-1286 

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 315 

High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011,for plaintiff-appellee 

Robert L. Raper, 6900 Houston Road, Suite 9, Florence, KY 41042, for defendant-appellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of 

the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the 

Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel, oral 

argument having been waived. 

{¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Bryant M. King, has filed a brief with this court 
Butler CA2012-04-071

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that 

a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the 

trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be 

predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 

744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to 

determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant 

on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief 

and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that 

it is wholly frivolous. 

S. POWELL, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6861

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL DEMONTE JONES, a/k/a Mike Jones,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (5:08-cr-00396-FL-1)

Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: November 4, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Demonte Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Demonte Jones appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) to 

reduce sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Jones, No. 

5:08-cr-00396-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. May 23, 2014). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick L.
Alexander, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Patrick L.
    AlexanderPatrick
      L. AlexanderChief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      11, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED SCHED. CONTAINS SUMMARY FINAN. INFO. EXTRACTED FROM THE CO.'S
CONSOLIDATED BAL. SHEET AT DEC. 27, 1997 AND FROM THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPS. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 27, 1997 CONTAINED IN THE CO.'S ANNUAL REPORT
ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DEC. 27, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINAN. STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                           19260
<SECURITIES>                                      3890
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      20579
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 56728
<PP&E>                                           18191
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   75381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            23893
<BONDS>                                           8346
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                       43081
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     75381
<SALES>                                         135533
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                135533
<CGS>                                            86711
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    86711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 42433
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (3)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6392
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2493
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3899
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3899
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1993-A,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         25,624
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  135,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               161,452
<PP&E>                                         4,141,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,014,414)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,288,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,502
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,280,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,288,079
<SALES>                                        598,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               598,770
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  300,211<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                218,820
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            218,820
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   218,820
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>