alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,  for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, in his capacity as an officer of the BFA Liquidation  Trust (the "TRUST"),
that, to his knowledge:

     (a) the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ended June
         30, 2005 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the
         "REPORT"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b) the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Trust.

Date: August 12, 2005              By:    /s/ Clifton R. Jessup, Jr.
                                          --------------------------
                                   Name:  Clifton R. Jessup, Jr.
                                   Title: Liquidating Trustee

Date: August 12, 2005              By:    /s/ Mark A. Roberts
                                          -------------------
                                   Name:  Mark A. Roberts
                                   Title: Assistant to the Liquidating Trustee

This certification is not deemed to be "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise  subject to the liability of that
section.  This  certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.


                                      -20-
11th Conference on Air Quality 

Modeling

EPA RTP, NC Campus – August 12-13, 2015

Public Hearing

Public Presentations
11th Conference on Air Quality Modeling

• Wednesday Public Presentation Session Logistics

– The Conference is a Public Hearing for a proposed 

rulemaking.

• All presentations are officially part of the record and will be submitted to 

the proposed rulemaking Docket (ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0310).

• Everyone speaking today must identify themselves and their affiliation.

• All dialog is being transcribed and will also be submitted to the Docket.

• There will not be any Q&A during or following any presentation.

• Anyone not requesting a reserved spot to present will have an 

opportunity on Thursday to provide oral comments.

• Comments can be submitted to the Docket through October 27, 2015.

– Wednesday afternoon’s schedule is very full!

• There are 15 requested public presentations this afternoon.

• All presentation spots are 15 minutes in length.

• Speakers, please be respectful of the set time schedule.

08/12/2015 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 233 (Thursday, December 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 72055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28522]

[[Page 72055]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments; 
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Aviation 
Insurance

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA 
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information 
collection. The requested information is included in air carriers 
applications for insurance when insurance is not available from private 
sources.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by February 2, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Kathy 
DePaepe, Room 126B, Federal Aviation Administration, ASP-110, 6500 S. 
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of 
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the 
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the 
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d) 
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of 
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include 
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information 
collection.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy DePaepe at (405) 954-9362, or by 
email at: Kathy.DePaepe@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0514.
    Title: Aviation Insurance.
    Form Numbers: There are no FAA forms associated with this 
collection.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The information submitted by applicants for insurance 
under Chapter 443 of Title 49 U.S.C. is used by the FAA to identify the 
eligibility of parties to be insured, the amount of coverage required, 
and insurance premiums. Without collection of this information, the FAA 
would not be able to issue required insurance.
    Respondents: Approximately 61 applicants.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 4 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 616 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 1, 2014.
Albert R. Spence,
FAA Assistant Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises 
Business Services Division, ASP-110.
[FR Doc. 2014-28522 Filed 12-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies(the “Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 3) of the Company for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2005, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Ricardo  A. Salas                                    |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Ricardo A.  Salas, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 4,  2006                                          |

 

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H6164-H6165]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      REMOVAL OF REPRESENTATIVE McNERNEY AS COSPONSOR OF H.R. 5864

  Ms. SLAUGHTER. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to remove 
Representative McNerney of California as a cosponsor of H.R. 5864, the 
Invasive Fish and Wildlife Prevention Act.

[[Page H6165]]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Womack). Is there objection to the 
request of the gentlewoman from New York?
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1533]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            FISA AMENDMENTS ACT REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2012

                                 ______
                                 

                               speech of

                         HON. CHRIS VAN HOLLEN

                              of maryland

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 12, 2012

  Mr. VAN HOLLEN. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the FISA 
Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2012. Clearly, we must work to ensure 
that our intelligence and law enforcement communities continue to have 
the tools they need to protect American citizens. It is critically 
important, however, that in our effort to defend the liberties we 
cherish, we not enact measures that erode the very freedoms we seek to 
protect.
  This legislation, in its current form, still contains flaws which 
fail to ensure robust oversight of this program. Specifically, some of 
the amendments offered by my colleagues on the Judiciary and 
Intelligence Committees to increase transparency and shorten the sunset 
should have been included in the final bill. Unfortunately, we are 
considering this legislation under a closed rule, and no amendments can 
be offered to the full House.
  We must work to reauthorize this program in a balanced way that 
provides our experts with the authority they need to protect Americans 
while upholding the values enshrined in our Constitution. I look 
forward to working with our colleagues in the Senate to reform these 
provisions so that we don't need to make the false choice between 
security and freedom.

                          ____________________
```
#### JOHN H. TEMPLE, ET AL., COMPLAINANTS-APPELLANTS, v. CLINTON TRUST COMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Decided March 14, 1949.

*569Per Curiam.

A counsel fee will be allowed to Hannoch & Lassar, counsel for Pascal & Beckclman, Inc., and for William Beckelman, individually and as class representative, in the amount of twelve hundred fifty dollars, and to Herrigel, Linda-bury & Herrigel, counsel for Markley Opdyke, individually and as class representative, in the sum of seven hundred fifty dollars together with costs and expenses; said counsel fees to be paid from and charged pro rata against the amounts payable by Fidelity Union Trust Company to the common stockholders of Clinton Trust Company under the terms of the offer dated November 19, 1947, made by Fidelity Union Trust Company for the purchase of the assets of Clinton Trust Company.

*For gran ling motion:*Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Heher, Wacheneeld, Burling and Ackerson—6.

*Opposed:*None.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                       CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of
Verdisys, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Dan Williams, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                            /s/ DAN WILLIAMS
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:    Dan Williams
                                            Title:   Principal Executive Officer
                                            Date:    November 18, 2003

A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Verdisys, Inc. and will be retained by Verdisys, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF AVIVA PETROLEUM INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             690
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        602
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,298
<PP&E>                                          61,642
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,873
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,927
<BONDS>                                          7,210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,574
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,174
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,445
<SALES>                                          9,726
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,726
<CGS>                                           10,302
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,953
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 658
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (22,575)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (93)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (22,482)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22,482)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.71)   
        

</TABLE>
#### PERRY v. WATERS.

No. A-11908.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

April 29, 1953.

Clarence Perry, pro se.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., and Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

JONES, Judge.

This is an original action in habeas corpus instituted by the petitioner Clarence Perry for the purpose of securing his release from confinement in the penitentiary.

The verified petition alleges that petitioner is restrained by reason of a commitment issued by virtue of a judgment and sentence pronounced by the District Court of Tillman County in case No. 1821 in said county, wherein the petitioner was sentenced to serve a term of 10 years imprisonment in the penitentiary upon a plea of guilty to the crime of manslaughter on January 5, 1953.

The Attorney General has filed a demurrer to the petition. The petition was evidently prepared by an inmate of the penitentiary and is very poorly worded. It is difficult for us to understand just exactly the complaint which the petitioner is making but apparently his principal complaint is that the .judgment and sentence was excessive under the facts. This is a question that may not be inquired into on habeas corpus but is a question which may be considered on an appeal from a conviction.

On habeas corpus this court limits its inquiry to matters which are jurisdictional in their nature and will not lie to correct errors of law occurring at a trial. Since the petition alleges that the judgment and sentence was rendered on January 5, 1953, the petitioner has six months from that date in which to complete his appeal to this court from said judgment. 22 O.S. 1951 § 1054. On an appeal the matters about which complaint is made could be presented and determined by this court.

The petition is denied.

POWELL, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
# C_2009055EN.01002801.xml

| 7.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/28

---

Action brought on 8 December 2008 — Tuzzi fashion v OHIM — El Corte Inglés (Emidio Tucci)

(Case T-535/08)

(2009/C 55/52)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Tuzzi fashion GmbH (Fulda, Germany) (represented by: R. Kunze and G. Würtenberger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 September 2008 in case R 1561/2007-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 September 2008 in case R 1561/2007-2; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘Emidio Tucci’, for goods in class 25

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: German trade mark registration No 1 078 843 of the word mark ‘TUZZI’ for goods in class 25; International trade mark registration No 496 835 with effect in Austria, France, the Benelux countries and Poland of the word mark ‘TUZZI’ for goods in class 25; Company name ‘TUZZI FASHION GMBH’ used in the course of trade in Germany for clothing.

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1) and (4) of Council Regulation 40/94 as the Board of Appeal wrongly assessed the likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned; Infringement of Article 73 of Council Regulation 40/94 as the Board of Appeal failed to address in a comprehensive manner the arguments put forward by the applicant and to objectively state the reasons on which its decision has been based; Infringement of Article 74 of Council Regulation 40/94 as the Board of Appeal failed to restrict itself in its examination to the facts, evidence and arguments put forward by the parties; Infringement of Article 79 of Council Regulation 40/94 since in its assessment of the defence of abuse of rights raised by the applicant the Board of Appeal failed to take into account general principles of procedural law recognized in the Member States.

Pleas in law:

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6062]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              DISCHARGE PETITIONS--ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS

  The following Members' names were withdrawn from the following 
discharge petition:

       Petition 5 by Mr. BRALEY on House Resolution 739: Scott R. 
     Tipton, Renee L. Ellmers.
```
**Exhibit32.2**

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.1350, I, the undersigned Vice President of Finance of Liquidmetal Technologies,Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,2007, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Won Chung                        |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Won Chung, Vice President of Finance |
| August 14, 2007                      |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Belden Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard K. Reece, Vice
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                 material respects, the financial condition and results of
                 operations of the Company.

/s/Richard K. Reece
-------------------
Richard K. Reece
Vice President, Finance and
    Chief Financial Officer
March 11, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Order entered June 18, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00032
- CV
E
- SYSTEMS CORPORATIO N, RONALD FINLAYSON, AND DAVID ZISSKIND, Appellant s V. LIQUID CAPITAL EXCHANGE, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 16
- 16142



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s June 15, 2018 unopposed motion for second extension of
time to file brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than July 23, 2018. We caution appellee that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03524
THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.