# REQUEST FOR REDESIGNATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR OZONE ATTAINMENT IN THE INDIANAPORTION OF THE CINCINNATIHAMILTON, OH-KY-IN 8-HOUR OZONE NONATTAINMENT AREA

Dearborn County, Indiana (Lawrenceburg Township)

Developed By: The Indiana Department of Environmental Management

November 2009

## This page intentionally left blank

### i TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Back ground

................................................................................................................ ............................... 2
1.2 Geographical Description of Indiana's Portion of the Nona ttainment Area ............................................. 2

1.3 Status of Air Qua lity

..................................................................................................... ............................. 3



### 2.0 REQUIREMENTS FOR REDESIGNATION ......................................................... 3

2.1 General ................................................................................................................... ................................... 3
2.2 Ozone Monitoring............. ..................................................................................................... ............... 3
2.3 Emission Inventory ........................................................................................................ ............................ 4
2.4 Modeling De monstration .................................................................................................... ....................... 4
2.5 Controls and Regulations .................................................................................................. ........................ 4

2.6 Corrective Actions for Potential Fu ture Violations of the Standard ........................................................ .. 5



### 3.0 OZONE MONITORING ........................................................................................... 5

3.1 Ozone Monitoring Network .................................................................................................. .................... 5
3.2 Ambient Ozone Monitoring Data ............................................................................................. ................. 7
3.3 Quality Assurance ......................................................................................................... ............................ 9

3.4 Continued Monito ring

...................................................................................................... ....................... 10



### 4.0 EMISSION INVENTORY ....................................................................................... 10

4.1 Emission Trends ........................................................................................................... ........................... 10
4.2 Base Year Inventory ....................................................................................................... ......................... 17

4.3 Emission Pr ojections ...................................................................................................... ......................... 18

4.4 Demonstration of Maintenance .............................................................................................. ................. 23

4.5 Permanent and Enforcea ble Emissions Reductions ............................................................................ ..... 23

4.6 Provisions for Future Updates ............................................................................................. .................... 24



### 5.0 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY BUDGETS ............................................. 24

5.1 On-Road Emi ssion Estimates ................................................................................................ .................. 24

5.2 Overview .................................................................................................................. ............................... 24

5.3 Emission Estimates ........................................................................................................ .......................... 25

### ii 6.0 CONTROL MEASURES AND REGULATIONS ................................................. 27

6.1 Reasonably Available Cont rol Technology (RACT) ............................................................................ ... 27
6.2 Implementation of Past SIP Re visions ...................................................................................... .............. 27
6.3 Nitrogen Oxides (NO
x ) Rule ................................................................................................................... 27
6.4 Measures B eyond Clean Air Act Requirements ............................................................................... ...... 28

6.5 Controls to Remain in Effect .............................................................................................. ..................... 29

6.6 New Source Review Provisions .............................................................................................. ................ 30



### 7.0 MODELING and METEOROLOGY ..................................................................... 30

7.1 Summary of Mo deling Results ............................................................................................... ................. 30
7.2 U.S. EPA Modeling Analysis for HDE Final Rulemaking ...................................................................... 30
7.3 U.S. EPA Modeling for Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), 2005 ........................................................... 31

7.4 LADCO's Round 5 and Round 6 Modeli ng for 8-Hour Ozone Standard ................................................ 32
7.5 Summary of Existin g Modeling Results ...................................................................................... ............ 33
7.6 Temperature Analysis for the Cincinnati, Ohio Area ........................................................................ ...... 34
7.7 Summary of Meteor ological Conditions ...................................................................................... ........... 37



### 8.0 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ...................................................................................... 38

8.1 Commitment to Revise Plan ................................................................................................. ................... 38

8.2 Commitment for Con tingency M easures ....................................................................................... .......... 38
8.3 Contingency Measures ...................................................................................................... ...................... 39



### 9.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .................................................................................... 40

10.0 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................... 40

### iii FIGURES

3.1 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH- KY-IN Nonattainment Area ......................................................................... .. 6



### TABLES

3.1 Monitoring Data for Kentucky’s Portion of the Nonattainment Area (Annual 4 th High and Design Values in ppm) ................................................................................................................ ............................... 7
3.2 Monitoring Data for Ohio’s Portion of the Nonattainment Area (Annual 4 th High and Design Values in ppm) .......................................................................................................................... ..................................... 8
4.1 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2020 Projected NO
x and VOC Emission Estimates, All Anthropogenic Sources in Lawren ceburg Township, Dearborn Coun ty (Tons Per Summer Day) .............. 22
4.2 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2020 Projected NO
x and VOC Emissions Estimates, All Anthropogenic Sources in the Entire Nonatta inment Area (Tons Per Summer Day) ................................... 22

5.1 Emission Estimates for On-Road Mobile Sources for the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Ozone Nonattainment Area ............................................................................................................ .......................... 25
5.3 Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets (MVEB) for the Ohio and Indiana Portions of the CincinnatiHamilton, OH-KY-IN Ozone Nonattainment Area ................................................................................... ... 25

6.1 Trends in EGU Ozone Season NO
x Emissions Statewid e in Indiana ..................................................... 28
7.1 Modeling Results: U.S. EPA HDE Rulemaking for the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area ............................................................................................................ .......................... 31
7.2 Modeling Results From U.S. EPA fo r the Clean Air Inte rstate Ru le ..................................................... 32
7.3 Application of Round 5 RRFs (with CAIR) to Most Current Base-Year Design Values ...................... 33
7.4 Application of Round 6 RRFs (without CAIR) to Most Current Base-Year Design Values ................. 33
7.5 Analysis of Maximum Temperatures for the Cincinnati, Ohio Area ..................................................... 35
7.6 Comparison of Days with 90° F and 8- hour Ozone Exceedance Days 1998-2008 ............................... 36

### iv GRAPHS

3.1 2007-2009 Design Values for the Cincinna ti-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area ..................... 8
3.2 Design Value Trends in the Cincinnati-Hamiton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area, 2004-2009 ............ 9

4.1 NO x Point Source Emissions, Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana, 2005 and 2008 ... 11
4.2 VOC Point Source Emissions, Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana, 2005 and 2008 . 11

4.3 NO x Point Source Emissions, Entire Nona ttainment Area, 200 5 and 20 08 ............................................ 12

4.4 VOC Point Source Emissions, Entire Nonattainment Area, 2005 and 20 08 .......................................... 12

4.5 NO x Emissions from Lawrenceburg Township, Dear born County, Indiana Electric Generating Unit American Electric Power-Tanners Cree k Generating Stati on, 1999-200 8 ................................................... 14

4.6 NO x Emissions from Entire Nonattainment Ar ea Electric Generating Units, 1999- 2008 ..................... 14

4.7 NO x Emissions Trends, 2005 and 2008, All Anthropogenic Sources in Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County ............................................................................................................... ........................... 15
4.8 VOC Emissions Trends, 2005 and 2008, All Anthropogenic Sources in Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County ............................................................................................................... ........................... 16

4.9 NO x Emissions Trends, 2005 and 2 008, All Anthropogenic Sources-En tire Nonattainment Area ....... 16

4.10 VOC Emissions Trends, 2005 and 2008, All An thropogenic Sources-Entire Nonattainment Area .... 17
4.11 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected NO
x Emissions for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County ..................................................................................................... ................... 19
4.12 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County ..................................................................................................... ................... 20
4.13 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected NO
x Emissions for Entire Nonattainment Area ............................................................................................................ .......................... 20
4.14 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions for Entire Nonattainment Area ............................................................................................................ .......................... 21
4.15 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected NO
x Emissions for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County Indian a and, Kentucky and Ohio .................................................................... 2 1
4.16 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected NO
x Emissions for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County Indian a and, Kentucky and Ohio .................................................................... 2 2
7.1 Actual Design Values for Cincinnati From 1996 Through 2008 ............................................................ 33
7.2 Comparison of Days with 90° F an d 8-hour Ozone Exc eedance Days .................................................. 37

### v APPENDICES

A Air Quality System (AQS) Monitor Da ta Values for Cincinnati-Hamilton OHKY-IN Nonattainment Area (2004-2009)

B Nitrogen Oxides (NO x 

### ) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), Point Source Emissions, 2005 and 2008, for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County Indiana and Entire Cincinnati-Ham ilton OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area

C Nitrogen Oxides (NO x 

### ) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), All Emission Sources, 2005 and 2008, for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana and Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area

D Nitrogen Oxides (NO x 

### ) Emissions from Electric Ge nerating Units, Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana and Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area

E 2008 Base Year Emissions Inventory and 2015 and 2020 Projected Emissions Inventory for Nitrogen Oxides (NO x 

### ) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), All Emission Sources for Lawrencebur g Township, Dearborn County, Indiana and Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area

F Mobile Source Input/Output Calculation Files

G Indiana Department of Environmen tal Management (IDEM)-Area Source Inventory Standard Operating Procedure

H Lake Michigan Air Directors Cons ortium (LADCO) Emission Estimates Technical Support Document

I Lake Michigan Air Directors Consor tium (LADCO) Round 5 Modeling Technical Support Document (Round 5 Photochemical Modeling Based on “Base M” Emissions Inventory, Revised Version of “Base K”)

### vi 

## This page intentionally left blank

### 1 REQUEST FOR REDESIGNATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR OZONE ATTAINMENT IN THE INDIANA PORTION OF THE CINCINNATI-HAMILTON OH-KY-IN 8-HOUR OZONE NONATTAINMENT AREA

DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA (LAWRENCEBURG TOWNSHIP)

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This document supports Indiana’s request that the Indi ana portion (Lawren ceburg Township in Dearborn County, Indiana) of the Cincinnati-H amilton OH-KY-IN area be redesignated from nonattainment to attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. In addition, the States of Kentucky and Ohio also intend to submit requests for their porti ons of the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN basic ozone nonattainment area to be redesignated from nonattainment to attainment for the 8-hour ozone national ambient air qual ity standard (NAAQS). The Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN area has recorded three (3) years of complete, qualit y-assured ambient air quality monitoring data for the years 2007 through 2009, dem onstrating attainment of the 8-hour ozone standard.

Indiana’s request is based on Section 107(d)(3)( D) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), which states:

The Governor of any State may, on the Governor’s own motion, submit to the Administrator a revised designa tion of any area or portion th ereof within the State. Within 18 months of receipt of a complete State redesignation submittal, the Administrator shall approve or deny such redesignation. The submission of a redesignation by a Governor shall not affect the effectiveness or enforceability of the applicable implementation plan for the State.

Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA establishes specif ic requirements to be met in order for an area (or portion of an area) to be consid ered for redesignation as follows:

The Administrator may not promulgate a re designation of a nonattainment area (or portion thereof) to attainment unless--

(i) the Administrator determines that the area has attained the national ambient air quality standard; (ii) the Administrator has fully approved the applicable implementation plan for the area under section 110(k); (iii) the Administrator determines that the improvement in air quality is due to permanent and enforceable reductio ns in emissions resulting from implementation of the applicable implementation plan and applicable Federal air pollutant control regu lations and other permanent and enforceable reductions;

### 2 (iv) the Administrator has fully approved a maintenance plan for the area as meeting the requirements of section 175A; and (v) the state containing such area has met all requirements applicable to the area under section 110 and part D.

This document addresses each of these requireme nts, and provides additional information to support continued compliance with the 1997 8-hour ozone standard.

1.1 Background

The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires areas designat ed nonattainment for the NAAQS for ozone to develop State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to expedi tiously attain and maintain the standard. In 1997, the United States Environmen tal Protection Agency (U.S. EP A) revised the air quality standards for ozone, replacing the 1979 1-hour standard with an 8-hour ozone standard set at 0.08 parts per million (ppm). The standard was challenged legally and upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in February of 2001. The U.S. EPA designated areas under the 8-hour ozone standard on April 15, 2004 as attainme nt, nonattainment or unclassifiable.

The U.S. EPA designated Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County, Indiana as a portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area (40 CFR 81.315) and classified the area “basic” under Subpart 1 of Part D of the CAA. The specific counties an d partial counties that comprise the nonattainment area, as de fined in 40 CFR 81.315, 40 CFR 81.318 and 40 CFR 81.336, include Lawrenceburg Township in Dear born County, Indiana; Boone, Campbell and Kenton counties, Kentucky; and Butler, Clermont , Clinton, Hamilton and Warren counties, Ohio. This designation subjected th e area to the new 8-hour oz one requirements, including development of a plan to reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NO x 

### ) and a demonstration that the area will meet the federal 8-hour air quality standard for ozone by June 15, 2010.

1.2 Geographical Description of Indiana’s Po rtion of the Entire Nonattainment Area

Following is a brief description of the Cincinnati basic nonattainment area.

Lawrenceburg Township, located in Dearborn C ounty in southeast Indiana, Boone, Campbell and Kenton counties located in north central Ke ntucky and Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton and Warren counties located in southwestern Ohio are part of the Cincinnati metropolitan statistical area. This area is surrounded by the Indiana counties of Franklin, Ohio, Ripley, Switzerland and Union, the Kentucky counties of Bracken, Gallatin, Gran t and Pendleton and the Ohio counties of Brown, Fayette, Greene, Highl and, Montgomery and Preble. The Ohio River flows along the borders of Indian a, Kentucky and Ohio and the ar ea lies within the Ohio River Valley. The Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Basic Nonattainment Area is depicted in Figure 3.1.

The Indiana Department of Environmental Mana gement (IDEM), on behalf of the State of Indiana, is requesting redesigna tion of Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana. The Kentucky Department for Environmental Protecti on (KDEP) is responsible for Boone, Campbell

### 3 and Kenton counties in Kentucky. The Ohio Envi ronmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) is responsible for Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Ham ilton and Warren counties in Ohio. KDEP and Ohio EPA are requesting redesignation of thei r portions of the nonattainment area from U.S. EPA Regions IV and V, concurrently.

1.3 Status of Air Quality

Ozone monitoring data for the most recent three (3) years, 2007 through 2009, demonstrates that air quality has met the NAAQS for ozone thr oughout the nonattainme nt area, including Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County. This fact, accompanied by the permanent and enforceable decreases in emission levels discu ssed in Section 4.0, justifies a redesignation to attainment for Indiana’s portion of the nonattainment area based on Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA.

2.0 REQUIREMENTS FOR REDESIGNATION

2.1 General

Section 110 and Part D of the CAA list a num ber of requirements that must be met by nonattainment areas prior to consideration for rede signation to attainment. In addition, U.S. EPA has published detailed guidance in a document entitled Procedures for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to Attainment , issued September 4, 1992, to Re gional Air Directors. This document is hereafter referred to as “Redesigna tion Guidance”. This Request for Redesignation and Maintenance Plan is based on the Redesi gnation Guidance, supplemented with additional guidance received from staff of the Criteria Pollutant Section of U.S. EPA Region V. The specific requirements for redesignation are listed below.

2.2 Ozone Monitoring CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(i)

1) A demonstration that the NAAQS for ozone, as published in 40 CFR 50.4, has been attained. Ozone monitoring data must show that violations of the ambient standard are no longer occurring.

2) Ambient monitoring data quality assure d in accordance with 40 CFR 58.10, have been recorded in the U.S. EPA Air Quality System (AQS) database, and made available for public view.

3) A showing that the three-year average of the fourth highest values, based on data from all monitoring sites in the area or its affected downwind environs, are below 85 parts per billion (ppb). This show ing must rely on three (3) complete, consecutive calendar years of quality assured data.

4) A commitment that, once redesignated, the state will continue to operate an appropriate monitoring network to verify the maintenance of the attainment

status.

### 4 2.3 Emission Inventory CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(iii)

1) A comprehensive emissions inventory of the precursors of ozone completed for the base year.

2) A projection of the emissions inventor y to a year at le ast 10 years following redesignation.

3) A demonstration that the pr ojected level of emissions is sufficient to maintain the ozone standard.

4) A demonstration that improvement in air quality between th e year violations occurred and attainment was achieved is based on permanent and enforceable emission reductions and not on tempor ary adverse economic conditions or unusually favorable meteorology.

5) Provisions for future annual updates of the inventory to enable tracking of the emission levels including an annual em ission statement from major sources.

2.4 Modeling Demonstration

While no modeling is required for redesigna ting ozone nonattainment areas, IDEM has incorporated photochemical modeling informati on as part of this document to further support its request for Lawrenceburg Townsh ip in Dearborn County, Indiana, to be redesignated to attainment.

2.5 Controls and Regulations CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(i i) & CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(v)

1) A U.S. EPA approved SIP control stra tegy that includes R easonably Available Control Technology (RACT) requirements fo r existing stationary sources covered by Control Technology Guidelines (CTG ) and non-CTG RACT for all major

sources.

2) Evidence that control measures required in past ozone SIP revisions have been fully implemented.

3) Acceptable provisions to pr ovide for new source review.

4) Assurances that existing controls will remain in effect after redesignation, unless the state demonstrates through photochemical modeling that the standard can be maintained without one or more controls.

5) If appropriate, a commitment to adopt a requirement that all transportation plans conform with and are cons istent with the SIP.

### 5 2.6 Corrective Actions for Potential Fu ture Violations of the Standard

1) A commitment to submit a revised pl an eight (8) years after redesignation.

2) A commitment to expeditiously enact and implement additional contingency control measures in response to excee ding specified predetermined levels (triggers) or in the event that future vi olations of the ambient standards occur.

3) A list of potential contingency measures that would be implemented in such an

event.

4) A list of VOC and NO x 

### sources potentially subject to future controls.

3.0 OZONE MONITORING

3.1 Ozone Monitoring Network

There are currently eleven (11) monitors meas uring ozone concentratio ns in the CincinnatiHamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area. Three monitors are located in Kentucky and eight monitors are located in Ohio. Indiana doe s not have any ozone monitors located in Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County. A listing of the sites al ong with their annual fourth highest readings from 2007 through 2009 ar e shown in Table 3.1 and Table 3.2 and were retrieved from U.S. EPA’s Air Quality System (A QS) database. The locations of the monitoring sites for this nonattainment area are shown on Figure 3.1. Monitoring data is draft at this time and will be updated once it has been finalized.

### 6 Figure 3.1 Map of the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area

39-017-1004

39-061-0006

39-061-0010

21-117-0007 21-037-3002 39-017-0004 39-165-0007

39-025-0022

39-061-0040 39-027-1002

21-015-0003 BOONE

GRANT MASON PENDLETON

OWEN BRACKEN KENTON

LEWIS CAMPBELL

GALLATIN

CARROLL

ROBERTSON HARRISON HENRY FLEMING Butler

Brown Clinton

Highland Warren Greene

Clermont

Adams Preble

Hamilton Fayette Montgomery Madison Clark

Dearborn Franklin Union

Ohio Wayne

Switzerland Fayette

Ripley



# Legend

Ozone Monitor
Interstate Higways
US Highways

Indiana Counties in Attainment

Ohio Counties in Attainment
Kentucky Counties in Attainment

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 0 20 40 10 Miles

0 25 50 12.5 Kilometers

10/28/09

### 7 3.2 Ambient Ozone Monitoring Data

The following information is taken from U.S. EPA's "Guideline on Data Handling Conventions for the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard ( NAAQS)," EPA-454/R-98-017, December 1998.

U.S. EPA requires three (3) comple te years of ozone monitoring da ta to demonstrate attainment at a monitoring site. The 8-hour primary and se condary ozone ambient ai r quality standards are met at an ambient air quality monitoring site wh en the three-year averag e of the annual fourthhighest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration is le ss than or equal to 0.08 parts per million (ppm). When this occurs, the site is deemed to be in attainment. Three (3) significant digits must be carried out in the computations. Because the third decimal digit, in ppm, is rounded, 0.084 ppm is the largest con centration that is less than or equal to 0.08 ppm. Therefore, for the purposes of this request, the 8-hour standa rd is considered to be 0.085 ppm. Values below 0.085 ppm meet the standard, values equa l to or greater than 0.085 ppm exceed the standard. These data handling procedures are ap plied on an individual ba sis at each monitor in the area. An area complies with the 8-hour oz one NAAQS only if every monitoring site in the area meets the NAAQS. An individual site's th ree-year average of th e annual fourth highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration is also called the site's design value. The air quality design value for the area is the highest design va lue among all sites in the area. Table 3.1 outlines the draft annual fourth high values and three-year design values for 2004 through 2009 for the three active monitoring sites in Kentuc ky’s portion of the nonattainment area. Table 3.2 outlines the draft annual fourth high values and three-year design values for 2004 through 2009 for the eight active monitoring sites within Ohio ’s portion of the nonattainment area. None of the eleven monitors within the Cincinna ti-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area has a 2007 through 2009 design value greater than 0.082 ppm. The 2009 monitoring data is draft at this time and will be updated once it has been quality assured.

DRAFT Table 3.1 Monitoring Data for Kentucky’s Portion of the Nonattainment Area (Annual 4 th 

### High and Design Values in ppm)

County Site ID 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2004- 2006 2005- 2007 2006- 2008 2007- 2009 Boone 21-015-0003 0.070 0.082 0.071 0.078 0.064 0.064 0.074 0.077 0.071 0.069 Campbell 21-037-3002 0.086 0.075 0.068 0.076

Kenton 21-117-0007 0.073 0.084 0.075 0.085 0.073 0.074 0.077 0.081 0.078 0.077
Red text indicates values are ≥ 0.085 ppm

### 8 DRAFT Table 3.2 Monitoring Data for Ohio’s Portion of Nonattainment Area (Annual 4 th 

### High and Design Values in ppm)

County Site ID 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2004- 2006 2005- 2007 2006- 2008 2007- 2009 Butler 39-017-0004 0.075 0.086 0.079 0.091 0.071 0.073 0.080 0.085 0.080 0.078 Butler 39-017-1004 0.076 0.088 0.076 0.091 0.079 0.076 0.080 0.085 0.082 0.082 Clermont 39-025-0022 0.076 0.083 0.077 0.086 0.071 0.069 0.079 0.082 0.078 0.075 Clinton 39-027-1002 0.078 0.083 0.081 0.082 0.076 0.070 0.081 0.082 0.080 0.076 Hamilton 39-061-0006 0.076 0.089 0.081 0.089 0.086 0.072 0.082 0.086 0.085 0.082 Hamilton 39-061-0010 0.075 0.085 0.081 0.086 0.077 0.065 0.080 0.084 0.081 0.076 Hamilton 39-061-0040 0.076 0.087 0.078 0.086 0.080 0.074 0.080 0.084 0.081 0.080 Warren 39-165-0007 0.081 0.092 0.086 0.088 0.082 0.077 0.086 0.089 0.085 0.082
Red text indicates values are ≥ 0.085 ppm



### Graph 3.1 below visually demonstrates the draft de sign values for this nonattainment area. The highest design value within the nonattainment area is 0.082 ppm. The draft design values calculated for the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area de monstrate that the NAAQS for ozone has been attained.

DRAFT Graph 3.1 2007-2009 Design Values for th e Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area

0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040 0.050 0.060 0.070 0.080 0.090

KY 338, KY Highland Heights, KY Covington,
KY Hamilton, OH Middletow n, OH Batavia, OH Wilmington, OH Cincinnati, OH-Grooms
Rd. Cleves, OH Cincinnati, OH-WM. How ard Taft
Rd. Lebanon, OH

21-015-0003 21-037-3002 21-117-0007 39-017-0004 39-017-1004 39-025-0022 39-027-1002 39-061-0006 39-061-0010 39-061-0040 39-165-0007Parts per Million

2007-2009 8-Hour Ozone Standard

### 9 Graph 3.2 illustrates the design value tre nds for the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area.

DRAFT

Graph 3.2 Design Value Trends in the Ci ncinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area, 2004-2009

0.060 0.065 0.070 0.075 0.080 0.085 0.090 0.095

04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09Parts per Million 21-015-0003 KY 338, KY

21-037-3002 Highland Heights, KY

21-117-0007 Covington, KY

39-017-0004 Hamilton, OH

39-017-1004 Middletow n, OH

39-025-0022 Batavia, OH

39-027-1002 Wilmington, OH

39-061-0006 Cincinnati, OH-Grooms Rd.

39-061-0010 Cleves, OH

39-061-0040 Cincinnati, OH-WM. How ard Taft Rd.
39-165-0007 Lebanon, OH

8-Hour Ozone Standard



### The above draft graph shows the tren d in design values for the region over the past several years. A comprehensive list of the indivi dual sites' design values over th is period is in Appendix A. The area's design values have recently trended downward as emissions have declined due to programs such as the Acid Rain program and cl eaner automobiles and fuels both regionally and locally. U.S. EPA’s rule to c ontrol nitrogen oxides from spec ific source categories (40 CFR Parts 51, 72, 75 and 96, published on October 17, 1998 and referred to as the “NO x 

### SIP Call”) has significantly reduced emissions from larg e electric generating units (EGUs), industrial boilers and cement kilns. Indiana's NO x 

### Rule was approved on June 6, 2001 (326 IAC 10-3 and 10-4). The SIP submittals of other Midwest states were approved in this timeframe as well. An analysis of meteorological conditions and monitoring values is in Section 7.0 and supports the conclusion that attainment of the standard as of 2009 is not the result of unusually favorable meteorological conditions. It is expected that this downward trend will continue as the above programs continue.

3.3 Quality Assurance

Ohio and Kentucky have quality assured all da ta shown in Appendix A in accordance with 40 CFR 58.10 and the Quality Assurance Manual. Ohio and Kentucky have recorded the data in the AQS database and, thus, the data are available to the public.

### 10 3.4 Continued Monitoring

Ohio and Kentucky have committed to continue mon itoring ozone levels at the sites indicated in Table 3.1 and Appendix A. IDEM will consult with Ohio, Kentucky and the U.S. EPA Region IV and V staff prior to making changes to the existing monitoring network, should changes become necessary in the future. Ohio and Kentucky will continue to quality assure the monitoring data to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 58. Updates to the IDEM website 1 

### will provide real time availability of the data and knowledge of any exceedances at these monitors. Ohio and Kentucky will enter a ll data into AQS in a timely manner in accordance with federal guidelines.

4.0 EMISSION INVENTORY

U.S. EPA’s Redesignation Guidance requires the submittal of a comprehensive inventory of ozone precursor emissions (VOC and NO x 

### ) representative of the year when the area achieves attainment of the ozone air qua lity standard. Indiana must also demonstrate that the improvement in air quality between the year that violations occurred and the year that attainment was achieved is based on permanent and enforcea ble emission reductions. Other requirements related to the emissions inventory include a projection of the emissi on inventory to a year at least ten (10) years following redesignation, a demonstra tion that the projected level of emissions is sufficient to maintain the ozone standard and a commitment to provide future updates of the inventory to enable tracking of emission levels during the ten (10) year maintenance period. The following subsections address each of these requirements.

4.1 Emission Trends

Point Sources Graphs 4.1 and 4.2 show the trend within Indi ana’s portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KYIN nonattainment area, in poi nt source emissions of NO x 

### and VOC, respectively, that generally correspond to the years of monitored values refere nced in this plan. The point source data is taken from Indiana's annual emissions reporting pr ogram. Graphs and data tables of emissions from each point source in Lawrenceburg Townsh ip, Dearborn County, Indiana are available in Appendix B. Although the Indiana data shows a sli ght increase in the poi nt source emissions for NO x 

### and VOC, the emissions within Indiana’ s portion of the Cinci nnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area are insignificant compared to the point source emission s within the entire nonattainment area, as can be seen in Graphs 4.15 and 4.16. Graphs 4.3 and 4.4 show the trend of point source emissions with in the entire Cincin nati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area. Although the emissions trend within the enti re Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area for NO x 

### shows a slight increase in point source emissions, overall anthropogenic emissions for NO x 

### and VOC are trending downward, as ca n be seen in Graphs 4.9 and 4.10.

1 http://www.in.gov/idem/4670.htm

### 11 Graph 4.1 NO x 

### Point Source Emissions, Lawren ceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana, 2005 and 2008

30.00 30.20 30.40 30.60 30.80 31.00

2005 2008



### YearTons Per Summer Day



### NOx



### Graph 4.2 VOC Point Source Emissions, La wrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana, 2005 and 2008

- 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00

2005 2008 

### YearTons Per Summer Day



### VOC

### 12 Graph 4.3 NO x 

### Point Source Emissions, Entire Nonattainment Area, 2005 and 2008

30.00 50.00 70.00 90.00 110.00 130.00 150.00 170.00 190.00

2005 2008


### YearTons Per Summer Day



### NOx



### Graph 4.4 VOC Point Source Emissions, Entire Nonattainment Area, 2005 and 2008

- 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00

2005 2008 

### YearTons Per Summer Day



### VOC

### 13 EGU Sources Graph 4.5 shows the trend in NO x 

### emissions from the American Electric Power (AEP)-Tanners Creek Generating Station in Lawrenceburg Town ship, Dearborn County, Indiana. Graph 4.6 depicts the trends in NO x 

### emissions from EGUs for the entire nonattainment area. While ozone and its precursors are also transported into this region from outside areas, this information does provide some indication of the impact that the EGUs located in the nonattainment area may have on the entire nonattainment area. The emissions are decreasing substantially in response to national programs affecting all EGUs, such as the Acid Rain program and the NO x 

### SIP Call. Other sectors of the inventory also impact ozone formation, but large regional sources such as EGUs have a substantial impact on the formation of ozone. Graphs and data tables of emissions from each EGU source are available in Appendix D.

These data were taken from U.S. EPA's Clean Air Markets database 2

. 

### Data are available sooner for these units than other point source s in the inventory because of the NO x 

### SIP Call budget and trading requirements. Information from 2003 is significant because some EGUs started operation of their NO x 

### SIP Call controls in order to gene rate Early Reduction Credits for their future year NO x 

### budgets. The first season of the NO x 

### SIP Call budget period began May 31, 2004.

As part of the NO x 

### SIP Call, the states were required to adopt into their rules a budget for all large EGUs. Indiana’s budget is found in Indiana’s rules at 326 IAC 10-4. The budget represents a statewide cap on NO x 

### emissions. Although each unit is allocated emissions based upon historic heat input, utilities can meet th is budget by over-controlling certain units or purchasing credits from the market to account fo r overages at other units . To summarize, NO x 

### emissions have dramatically decreased over the years as represented on these graphs. These emissions, capped by the state rule, should remain at least this low through the maintenance period covered by this request.

2 http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/

### 14 Graph 4.5 NO x 

### Emissions from Lawrenceburg Town ship, Dearborn County, Indiana Electric Generating Unit American Electric Power-Tanners Creek Generating Station, 1999-2008

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,0001999200020012002200320042005200620072008

YearTons per Year

NOx



### Graph 4.6 NO x 

### Emissions from Entire Nonattainment Area Electric Generating Units, 1999-2008

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,0001999200020012002200320042005200620072008



### YearTons per Year



### NOx

### 15 All Anthropogenic Sources Periodic inventories, which include emissions fr om all sectors (mobile, area, nonroad and point sources) were prepared for 2005 and will be prep ared soon for 2008. The 2008 point source data for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana is taken from Indiana’s annual emissions reporting program. All other emission sources were extrapolated from Indiana’s 2005 periodic inventory submitted to U.S. EPA. Graphs 4.7 and 4.8 show the trends for the total emissions for NO x 

### and VOC for all anthropogenic sour ce categories within Dearborn County, and Graphs 4.9 and 4.10 show the trends for the entire nonattainment area, which also roughly follow the years of monitored air quality trends discussed in Section 3.0. Although Indiana’s portion of the nonattainment area shows an increa se in VOC, overall anthropogenic emissions in the entire nonattainment area have decreased as can be seen in Graph 4.10. Graphs and data tables of emissions from each source category are available in Appendix C. IDEM received emissions information for the Ohio and Kentucky portions of the nonattainment area for the years 2005, 2008, 2015 and 2020 from the Ohio EPA and Kentucky Division for Air Quality.

Graph 4.7 NO x 

### Emissions Trends, 2005 and 2008, All Anthropogenic Sources in Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County

31.00 32.00 33.00 34.00 35.00

2005 2008 

### YearTons Per Summer Day



### NOx

### 16 Graph 4.8 VOC Emissions Trends, 2005 and 2008, All Anthropogenic Sources in Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County

6.90 7.00 7.10 7.20 7.30 7.40 7.50 7.60

2005 2008 YearTons Per Summer Day



### VOC



### Graph 4.9 NO x 

### Emissions Trends, 2005 and 2008, All Anthropogenic Sources-Entire Nonattainment Area

200.00 250.00 300.00 350.00 400.00

2005 2008 

### YearTons Per Summer Day



### NOx

### 17 Graph 4.10 VOC Emissions Trends, 2005 and 2008, All Anthropogenic Sources-Entire Nonattainment Area

170.00 175.00 180.00 185.00 190.00 195.00 200.00 205.00 210.00 215.00 220.00



### 2005 2008 YearTons Per Summer Day



### VOC



### 4.2 Base Year Inventory

IDEM prepared a comprehensive inventory for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, including area, mobile, nonroad and point s ources for precursors of ozone (VOC and NO x 

### ) for the base year 2008.

• Area sources were extrapolated from the Indi ana 2005 periodic inventory submitted to U.S. EPA.

• Mobile source emissions were calculated fr om MOBILE6.2 produced emission factors and data extracted from the region’s travel-demand model. Several adjustments were made to the travel demand model and calculation methodol ogy since 1996. As a result, since the 1996, 1999 and 2002 emission inventories were prepared with slightly different methodology, they do not provide a true comparison with the 2004 through 2020 estimates. The fluctuations referenced in the data, pa rticularly 1996 through 2002 NO x 

### emissions, are due to changes in the calculation methodology, not necessarily actual mobile source emissions.

• Point source information was compiled from IDEM’s 2008 annual emissions statement database and the 2008 U.S. EPA Ai r Markets acid rain database 3



### .

• Biogenic emissions are not included in these summaries.

• Nonroad emissions for 2008 were extrapolat ed from the 2005 National Emissions Inventory (NEI). To address concerns about the accuracy of some of the categories in U.S. EPA’s nonroad emissions model, the Lake Mich igan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO),

3 http://camddataandmaps.epa.gov/gdm/

### 18 contracted with two (2) companies to review the base data and make recommendations. One of the contractors also estimated emissions for two (2) categories not included in U.S. EPA’s nonroad model and reviewed model inputs for another. Emissions were estimated for commercial marine vessels and railroads. Recreational motorboat population and spatial surrogates (used to assign emissions to each county) were significantly updated. The populations for the construction equipment cat egory were reviewed and updated based upon surveys completed in the Midwest and the tem poral allocation for agricultural sources was also updated by the other contra ctor. A new nonroad estimati on model was provided by U.S. EPA for the 2002 analysis. The 1996 and 1999 nonroad emission estimates were generated by a previous U.S. EPA model, and thus, cannot provide a true comparison. The fluctuations referenced in the data could be due to changes in the model and methodology and do not necessarily reflect changes in emissions.

IDEM received emissions information for the Ohio and Kentucky portions of the nonattainment area for the years 2005, 2008, 2015 and 2020 from the Ohio EPA and Kentucky Division for Air Quality. This inventory was prepar ed using similar methodologies.

Appendices B, C and E contain data tables and graphs of all these emissions.

4.3 Emission Projections

In consultation with the U.S. EPA and other stak eholders, IDEM selected the year 2020 as the maintenance year for this redesignation re quest. This document contains projected NO x 

### and VOC emissions inventories for 2015 4 

### and 2020 5.



### IDEM, with assistance from LADCO, prepared NO x 

### and VOC emission projections for 2015 and 2020 for Indiana’s portion of the nonattainment ar ea. IDEM received emissions information for Ohio and Kentucky portions of the nonattainment area for the years 2005, 2008, 2015 and 2020 from the Ohio EPA and Kentucky Division for Air Quality.

The detailed NO x 

### and VOC inventory information for th e entire nonattainment area for 2015 and 2020 is in Appendix E. NO x 

### and VOC emission trends are an important gauge for continued compliance with the ozone standard. Therefore, IDEM performed an initial comparison of the NO x 

### and VOC inventories for the base year (2008), interim year (2015) and maintenance year (2020) for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn C ounty. Graphs 4.11 and 4.12 visually compare the 2008 (base year) estimated NO x 

### and VOC emissions with the 2015 and 2020 projected emissions for Lawrenceburg Township, Dear born County, and Graphs 4.13 and 4.14 visually compare the 2008 (base year) estimated NO x 

### and VOC emissions with the 2015 and 2020 projected emissions for the entire nonattainme nt area. Graphs 4.15 and 4.16 visually compare the 2008 (base year) estimated NO x 

### and VOC emissions with the 2015 and 2020 projected emissions for Lawrenceburg Township to the Ke ntucky and Ohio portions of the nonattainment area. Mobile source emission inventories are de scribed in Section 5.0. In addition to LADCO’s

4 In Section 4.3 all emissions projections for area, non-road, and point/EGU emission projections for the year 2015 are based on 2009 emission estimates.

5 In Section 4.3 all emission projections for area, non-road, and point/EGU emission projections for the year 2020 are based on 2018 emission estimates.

### 19 estimates, NO x 

### emissions were projected based on the statewide EGU NO x 

### budgets from the Indiana NO x 

### rule. Although Indiana’s portion of the nonattainment area shows a slight increase in emissions from 2015 to 2020 for both NO x 

### and VOC, overall anthropogenic emissions in the entire nonattainment area have decreased as can be seen in Graph 4.13 and Graph 4.14

Graph 4.11 Comparison of 2008 Emis sions and 2015 and 2020 Projected NO x 

### Emissions for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County

31.40 31.60 31.80 32.00 32.20 32.40 32.60 32.80 33.00 33.20

2008 2015 2020 

### YearTons Per Summer Day

NOX

### 20 Graph 4.12 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County

6.50 6.60 6.70 6.80 6.90 7.00 7.10 7.20 7.30 7.40 7.50 7.60

2008 2015 2020 YearTons Per Summer Day

VOC



### Graph 4.13 Comparison of 2008 Emis sions and 2015 and 2020 Projected NO x 

### Emissions for the Entire Nonattainment Area

270.00 280.00 290.00 300.00 310.00 320.00 330.00 340.00 350.00

2008 2015 2020 YearTons Per Summer Day

NOX

### 21 Graph 4.14 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions for the Entire Nonattainment Area

- 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 160.00 180.00 200.00

2008 2015 2020 YearTons Per Summer Day

VOC



### Graph 4.15 Comparison of 2008 Emis sions and 2015 and 2020 Projected NO x 

### Emissions for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn Count y Indiana and Kentucky and Ohio

- 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00

2008 2015 2020 YearTons Per Summer Day

Lawrenceburg Township, IN Kentucky Ohio

### 22 Graph 4.16 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County Indiana and Kentucky and Ohio

- 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 160.00

2008 2015 2020 YearTons Per Summer Day

Lawrenceburg Township, IN Kentucky Ohio



### Table 4.1 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2020 Projected NO x 

### and VOC Emission Estimates, All Anthropogenic Sources in Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana (Tons per Summer Day)

2008 2020 Change % Decrease NO X 33.09 32.56 -0.53 1.60% VOC 7.49 6.96 -0.53 7.07%



### Table 4.2 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2020 Projected NO x 

### and VOC Emission

Estimates, All Anthropogenic Sources in the Entire Nonattainment Area (Tons Per Summer Day)

2008 2020 Change % Decrease NO X 344.32 297.25 -47.07 13.67% VOC 187.66 137.14 -50.52 26.92%



### VOC emissions within Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County are projected to decline by 7.07% between 2008 and 2020 and by 26.92% in the entire nonattainment area. NO x 

### emissions within Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn Count y are projected to decline by 1.60% between 2008 and 2020 and by 13.67% in the entire nonattai nment area. Emission reduction benefits

### 23 from U.S. EPA rules covering the NO x 

### SIP Call, Tier 2 Motor Vehicle Emissions Standards and Gasoline Sulfur Control Requirements 6 

### , Heavy-Duty Highway Engine Rule 7 

### and Nonroad Diesel Engine Rule 8 

### are factored into the changes. Fu rther, due to implementation of the NO x 

### SIP Call across the eastern United States, NO x 

### and ozone levels entering th is area will decrease.

4.4 Demonstration of Maintenance

Ambient air quality data from all monitoring si tes indicate that air quality in the entire Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment ar ea met the NAAQS for ozone in 2009. U.S. EPA’s Redesignation Guidance (pg. 9) states, “A state may generally demonstrate maintenance of the NAAQS by either showing that future emi ssions of a pollutant or its precursors will not exceed the level of the attainment inventory, or by modeling to show that the future mix of sources and emissions rates will not cause a violation of the NAAQS.” Emissions projections outlined in Section 4.0 of this documen t clearly illustrate that VOC and NO x 

### emissions in Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County and the entire nonattainment area will continue to decline between 2008 (base year) and 2020. Section 7.0 further disc usses the implications of these emissions trends and provi des an analysis to support thes e conclusions. Therefore, air quality should meet the ozone NAAQS through the projected years of 2015 and 2020.

In Indiana, major point sources in all counties are required to submit air emissions information once every three (3) years or annually if the VOC potential to emit is greater than 250 tons per year or the NO x 

### potential to emit is greater than 2,500 tons per year, in accordance with Indiana’s Emission Statement Rule at 326 IAC 2-6. IDEM pr epares a new periodic inventory for all ozone precursor emission sectors every three (3) years. These ozone precursor inventories will be prepared for 2011, 2014 and 2017, as necessary, to comply with the inventory reporting requirements established in the CAA. Emissions information will be compared to the 2008 base year and the 2020 projected maintenance year inventories to assess emission trends, as necessary, to assure continued co mpliance with the ozone standard.

4.5 Permanent and Enforceable Emissions Reductions

Permanent and enforceable reductions of VOCs and NO x 

### have resulted in attainment of the 8- hour ozone standard. Some of these reductions were due to the application of Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) rules and some were due to the application of tighter federal standards on new vehicles. In additi on, Title IV of the Clean Air Act and the NO x 

### SIP Call required the reduction of NO x 

### from utility sources. Section 6.0 identifies the emission control measures specific to Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, as well as the implementation status of each measure.

6 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2000/February/Day-10/a19a.htm 7 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR /1997/October/Day-21/a27494.htm 8 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1998/October/Day-23/a24836.htm

### 24 4.6 Provisions for Future Updates

As required by Section 175A(b) of the CAA, Indi ana commits to submit to the Administrator, eight (8) years after redesignation, an additional revision of this SIP. The revision will contain Indiana's plan for maintaining the national primar y ozone air quality standa rd for ten (10) years beyond the first ten (10) year period after redesignation.

5.0 MOBILE SOURCE EMISSION BUDGETS

U.S. EPA requirements outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e) (4) stipulate that mobile source emissions budgets for VOC and NO x 

### be established as part of a Stat e Implementation Plan (SIP). The mobile source emissions budgets are necessary to demonstrate conformance of transportation plans and improvement programs with the SIP. The following is a summary of the detailed mobile input and output calculati on files located in Appendix F.

5.1 On-Road Emission Estimates

The Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments (OKI) is the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Cinci nnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN area which includes Dearborn County in Indiana; Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton, and Warren Counties in Ohio; as well as, Boone, Campbell and Kenton Counties in Kentucky. This organization maintains a travel demand forecasting model that is used to simulate the traffic in the area and to predict what traffic would be in future years given growth expectations. The model is used mostly to identify where travel capacity will be needed a nd to determine the infrastructure requirements necessary to meet that need. It is also used to su pport the calculation of mobile source emissions. The travel demand forecasting model is used to predict the total daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and the U.S. EPA software program referred to as MOBILE6.2 is used to produce emission factors to calculate the emission s per mile. The product of these two outputs, once combined, is the total amount of pollution emitted by on-road vehicles for the particular analyzed area.

5.2 Overview

Broadly described, MOBILE6.2 is used to genera te “emission factors”, which are the average emissions per mile (grams/mile) for ozone precursors: NO x 

### and VOC. There are numerous variables that can affect the emission factors. The vehicle-fleet (vehicles on the road) age and the vehicle types have a major a ffect on the emission factors. Th e facility-type the vehicles are traveling on (MOBILE6.2 facility-t ypes are Freeway, Arterial, Lo cal and Ramp) and the vehicle speeds also affect the emission factor values. Me teorological factors such as air temperature and humidity affect the emission factors, as does fuel type, such as low RVP gasoline. These data are estimated using the best available data to generate emission factor s for the appropriate ozone precursors, NO x 

### and VOC. After emission factors are ge nerated, the emission factor(s) must be multiplied by the VMT to determine the quantity of vehicle-related emissions. This information derives from the travel demand model (TDM).

### 25 It should be noted that each year analyzed w ill have different emission factors, volumes, speeds and likely some additional links. MOBILE6.2 i nput and output files can all be found in Appendix F.

5.3 Emission Estimations

Table 5.1 outlines the on-road emission estimates for the entire nonattainment area for the years 2005, 2008 (Attainment Year), 2015 (Interim Year) and 2020 (Horizon Year). The following emission estimates are based on the actual TDM network runs for the years 2005, 2008, 2015 and 2020. Table 5.1 Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources for the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Ozone Nonattainment Area

Cincinnati-Hamilton OHKY-IN NA Area 2005 2008 2015 2020 VOC (tons/day) 69.43 55.47 35.35 32.14

NO x 

### (tons/day) 136.73 113.45 51.04 38.17 Lawrenceburg Township (Dearborn County Indiana) subtotal VOC (tons/day) 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.42

NO x 

### (tons/day) 1.44 1.14 0.60 0.42

Lawrenceburg Township subtotal %
VOC (tons/day) 1.44 1.35 1.41 1.31

NO x 

### (tons/day) 1.05 1.00 1.18 1.10

Table 5.2 contains the 2015 and 2020 regional moto r vehicle emissions budgets for the Ohio and Indiana portions of the nonattainment area.

Table 5.2 Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets (MVEB) for the Ohio and Indiana Portions of the Cincinna ti-Hamilton OH-Ky-IN Ozone Nonattainment Area

2015 2020 VOC (tons/day) 31.73 28.82 NO x 

### (tons/day) 49.00 34.39

This document creates an Interim Year Moto r Vehicle Emission Budgets (MVEB) for 2015 and a Horizon Year MVEB for 2020 for the Ohio and Indiana portions of th e nonattainment area.

### 26 These budgets are based on the 2008 on-road emi ssion inventory used to support photochemical modeling for the same year, and has incorporated a fifteen (15) percent safety margin as described below.

Initial Base M (2005) CAMx mode ling results indicated a worst ca se future design value in the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nona ttainment area of 83 ppb. In an effort to accommodate future variations in TDMs and vehicle miles travel ed forecast when no change to the network is planned, Indiana consulted with the interage ncy consultation group, including U.S. EPA – Region 5, to determine a reasonable approach to address this vari ation. Based on this discussion, a fifteen (15) percent safety margin was approve d and has been added to the MVEB for the Ohio and Indiana portions of this nonattainment area.

A fifteen (15) percent safety margin is appr opriate because; 1) ther e is an acknowledged potential variation in VMT forecast and potentia l estimated mobile source emissions due to expected modifications to TDM and mobile emi ssions models; and 2) the total decrease in emissions from all sources is sufficient to acco mmodate this fifteen (15) percent allocation of safety margin to mobile sources while still continuing to maintain total emissions in the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN area well below the 2008 attainment level of emissions. This fifteen (15) percent safety margin was calculated by adding a straight-line fi fteen (15) percent to the mobile source emission estimates for the years 2015 and 2020. Safety margin, as defined by the conformity rule, looks at the total emissions from all sources in the nonattainment area. The actual allocation is less than fi fteen (15) percent of the total emission reduction from all sources as can be seen from Tables 4.1 and 4.2.

In summary, for all three states combined, the mobile budget safety margin allocation translates into:

• An allocation of 6.14 tons/day for VOC and 9.39 tons/day for NO x 

### for 2015; and

• An allocation of 6.76 tons/day for VOC and 9.49 tons/day for NO x 

### for 2020.

40 CFR 93.101 defines safety margin as the amount by which the total projected emissions from all sources of a given pollutant area less than the total emissions that would satisfy the applicable requirement for reasonable further progress, attain ment, or maintenance. When compared to the overall safety margin as defined by 40 CFR 93.101, it is evident this alloca tion to mobile sourcesis significantly below the total safety margin for all sources in the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KYIN area as detailed in Tables 4.1 and 4.2.

While Indiana believes that this is sufficient to support the requested in crease, Indiana and its partners will be conducting additional air quality modeling which will include the adjusted onroad mobile emissions as well as any additiona l corrections and modifications that may be necessary due to the constant review and evaluation of the model inputs.

Appendix F of this document provides a detailed description of how the above budgets were established and also documents the consultation and coordina tion process among the effected environmental and transportation planning agencies in establishing the budgets.

### 27 6.0 CONTROL MEASURES AND REGULATIONS

This section provides specif ic information on the control measures implemented in Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, includi ng CAA requirements and additional state or local measures implemented beyond CAA requirements.

6.1 Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT)

As required by Section 172 of the CAA, in th e mid-1990s, Indiana promulgated rules requiring RACT for emissions of VOCs. There were no sp ecific rules required by the CAA such as RACT for existing sources beyond statew ide rules. Statewide RACT ru les have applied to all new sources locating in Indiana since that time. The Indiana rules are found in 326 IAC 8. The following is a listing of applicable rules:

326 IAC 8-1 Best Available C ontrol Technology-New Facilities 326 IAC 8-2 Surface Coating Emission Limitations 326 IAC 8-3 Solvent Degreasing Operations 326 IAC 8-4 Petroleum Sources 326 IAC 8-5 Miscellaneous Operations 326 IAC 8-6 Organic Solvent Emission Limitations

Additional rules specifically applicable to Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County are summarized in Section 6.4.

6.2 Implementation of Past SIP Revisions

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County was not required to develop an Attainment Demonstration SIP for the 1-hour NAAQS. Th e area was designated nonattainment for 8-hour ozone NAAQS in April 2004. Indiana previously submitted an Attainment Demonstration for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County on June 13, 2007, but the area has now attained the standard. Emissions of VOCs are regulated by a pplicable statewide provisions of 326 IAC 8.

6.3 Nitrogen Oxides (NO x 

### ) Rule

The U.S. EPA NO x 

### SIP Call required twenty-two states to adopt rules that would result in significant emission reductions from large EGUs, industrial boilers and cement kilns in the eastern United States. Indiana adopted this rule in 2001. Beginning in 2004, this rule accounts for a reduction of approximately thirty-one percent (31%) of all NO x 

### emissions statewide compared to the previous uncontrolled years.

Twenty-one other states have also adopted these rules. The result is that significant reductions have occurred regionally and upwind within the nonattainment area because of the number of affected units within the region. Graphs 4.5 and 4.6 show that emissions covered by this program have been trending downward since 1999. Table 6.1, compiled from data taken from the U.S. EPA Clean Air Markets website, quantifies the gradual NO x 

### reductions that have occurred in Indiana as a result of Titl e IV (Acid Rain) of the CAA and the NO x 

### SIP Call Rule.

### 28 Further, U.S. EPA more recently published Phase II of the NO x 

### SIP Call that established a budget for large (greater than 1 ton per day emissi ons) stationary internal combustion engines. This rule decreases emissions statewide from natural gas compressor stations by 4,263 tons during the ozone season. The Indiana Phase II NO x 

### SIP Call rule became effective February 26, 2006 and implementation began in 2007.

TABLE 6.1 Trends in EGU Ozone Season NO x 

### Emissions Statewide in Indiana

Statewide Indiana NO x 

### Emissions from EGUs Year NOx Emissions (Tons per Year) 1999 347,216.5 2000 334,522.1 2001 315,419.7 2002 281,146.1 2003 260,980.0 2004 224,311.3 2005 207,981.6 2006 202,728.0 2007 196,553.1 2008 196,134.5 Budget 2009-2014 108,935.0

6.4 Measures Beyond Clean Air Act Requirements

Reductions in ozone precursor emissi ons have occurred, or are anticipa ted to occur, as a result of local and federal control programs. Th ese additional control measures include:

Tier 2 Emission Standards for Vehicl es and Gasoline Sulfur Standards 9 

### In February 2000, U.S. EPA finalized a federa l rule to significan tly reduce emissions from light-duty trucks, including SUVs to m eet an average standard of 0.07 grams of NO x 

### per mile. Implementation began in 2004 and was completed in 2007. The Tier 2 standards also cover passenger vehicles over 8,500 pounds gross ve hicle weight rating (large pickup trucks and SUVs), which are no t covered by the current Tier 1 standards. For these vehicles, the standards were pha sed in beginning in 2008, with full compliance in 2009. The new standards require vehicles to be 77% to 95% clea ner than those on the road prior to the new standards. The standard s also reduced the sulf ur content of gasoline to 30 ppm beginning in January 2006.

Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines 10 

### In July 2000, U.S. EPA issued a final rule for Heavy Duty Highway Engines, a program that includes low-sulfur diesel fuel standards that took eff ect in 2004. A second phase of standards and testing procedur es took effect in 2007 that reduced highway diesel fuel

9 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR /2000/February/Day-10/a19a.htm 10 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR /1997/October/Day-21/a27494.htm

### 29 sulfur content to 15 ppm. The total program is expected to achieve a 95% reduction in NO x 

### from diesel trucks and buses, a la rge sector of the mobile sources NO x 

### inventory.

Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule 11 

### In May 2004, U.S. EPA issued the Clean Air N onroad Diesel Rule. This rule applies to diesel engines used in industries such as construction, agriculture and mining. It also contains a cleaner fuel standard similar to the highway diesel program. The new standards will cut emissions from nonroad dies el engines by over ninety percent (90%). Nonroad diesel equipment, as described in this rule, currently accounts for forty-seven percent (47%) of diesel pa rticulate matter (PM) and tw enty-five percent (25%) of nitrogen oxides (NO x 

### ) from mobile sources nationwide. Sulfur levels will be reduced in nonroad diesel fuel by ninety-nine percent (99% ) from current levels, from approximately three thousand (3,000) parts per million (ppm ) now to (fifteen) 15 ppm in 2015. New engine standards take effect, based on engine horsepower, starting in 2008.

Together, these rules will substantially reduce lo cal and regional sources of ozone precursors. The modeling analyses discussed in Section 7.0 include these rules and show the ozone concentrations expected to re sult from their implementation.

Local Reductions Several permanent and enforceable reductions in emissions from local point sources have occurred beyond Clean Air Act Requirements.

The American Electric Power (AEP) -Tanner’s Creek Generating Station power plant, located in Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County, is covered by a consent decree and several, but not all, electric generating units will have to apply controls. Currently, the power plant is controlled by low NO x 

### burner technology (dry bottom only) and overfire air. AEP-Tanner’s Creek Generating Station will be installing selec tive non-catalytic reduction systems on three of its four electric generating units, with operation to begin in early 2010. This will achieve an additional 30% reduction in NO x. 

### The reductions from facili ties like the AEP-Tanners Creek power plant will help improve air quality in the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment

area.

6.5 Controls to Remain in Effect

Indiana commits to maintaining the aforemen tioned control measures after redesignation. Indiana commits that any changes to its rules or emission limits applicable to VOC and/or NO x 

### sources, as required for maintenance of the ozone standard in Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, will be submitted to U.S. EPA for approval as a SIP revision.

Indiana, through IDEM’s Office of Air Quality (OAQ) and the O ffice of Legal Counsel has the legal authority and necessary resources to activel y enforce any violations of its rules or permit provisions. After redesignation, it intends to continue enforcing all rules that relate to the emission of ozone precursors in Lawren ceburg Township, Dearborn County.

11 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR /1998/October/Day-23/a24836.htm

### 30 6.6 New Source Review Provisions

Indiana has a long standing and fully implemente d New Source Review (NSR) program that is outlined in 326 IAC 2. The rule includes the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting program in 326 IAC 2-2. Indiana's PSD program was conditionally approved on March 3, 2003 (68 FR 9892) and received final approval on May 20, 2004 (69 FR 29071) by U.S. EPA as part of the SIP.

Any facility that is not listed in the 2005 emission inventory, or for the closing of which credit was taken in demonstrating attainment, will not be allowed to construct, reopen, modify, or reconstruct without meeting all ap plicable permit rule requirements. The review process will be identical to that used for new sources. Once the area is redesignated, Indiana will implement NSR for major sources through the PSD program, wh ich requires an air quality analysis to evaluate whether the new sour ce will threaten the NAAQS.

7.0 MODELING AND METEOROLOGY

7.1 Summary of Modeling Results for National Emi ssion Control Strategies in Final Rulemakings

Although U.S. EPA’s Redesignation Guidance does not require modeling for ozone nonattainment areas seeking redesignation, extens ive modeling has been performed covering the Cincinnati, Ohio region to determine the effect of national emission cont rol strategies on ozone levels. These modeling analyses determined that the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN 8-hour ozone nonattainment area is significantly impact ed by ozone and ozone precursor transport and regional NO x 

### reductions have helped the area attain the 8-hour standar d. These results show that even in the absence of the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), the area will continue to attain the standard. Modeling results w ith or without CAIR do not di ffer significantly because the summertime CAIR program is essentially the same as the NO x 

### SIP Call, which was already included in the modeling analysis.

7.2 U.S. EPA Modeling Analysis for HDE Final Rulemaking

U.S. EPA conducted modeling for Tier II vehicles and low-sulfur fuels. This analysis was performed in 2000 to support final rulemaking fo r the Heavy Duty Engine (HDE) and Vehicle Standards and Highway Diesel Fu el and its expected impact on ozone levels. “Technical Support Document for the Heavy Duty Engine an d Vehicle Standards and Highway Diesel Fuel Sulfur Control Requirements: Air Qual ity Modeling Analyses ” (EPA420-R-00-028) was referenced for support of this ozone redesignatio n for the Cincinnati nonattainment area. Base year emissions from 1996 were modeled for th ree ozone episodes: June 12-24, 1995; July 5-15, 1995; and August 7-21, 1995. Results of this modeli ng show that ozone impacts from these fuel emission control measures, as well as the NO x 

### SIP Call, would be substa ntial in the CincinnatiHamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area. Relative Response Factors (RRF) were calculated for each monitor in the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY -IN nonattainment area for future years 2007 and 2020. IDEM has applied these RRFs to th e most recent three-year (2007-2009) design values. The resulting future year design va lues for 2007 and 2020 were calculated and are

### 31 shown below in Table 7.1. The 2007 modeled future year design values for all monitors in the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nona ttainment area are in atta inment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS of 0.08 ppm.

Table 7.1 Modeling Results: U.S. EPA HDE Rulemaking for the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area

Monitor ID Monitor Name County Design Value 2006- 2008 Modeled Relative Response Factor (RRFs) Future Design Value Modeled Relative Response Factor (RRFs) Future Design Value

2007 Base 2007 2020 Base 2020

390170004 Cincinnati CMSA Butler 0. 080 0.8957 0.072 0.8710 0.074 390171004 Cincinnati CMSA Butler 0. 082 0.8816 0.072 0.8507 0.069 390250020 Cincinnati CMSA Clermont 0.078 0.8834 0.069 0.8600 0.068 390271002 Cincinnati CMSA Clinton 0. 080 0.8560 0.068 0.8191 0.067 390610006 Cincinnati CMSA Hamilton 0. 085 0.8949 0.076 0.8771 0.074 390610010 Cincinnati CMSA Hamilton 0. 081 0.8826 0.071 0.8749 0.071 390610037 Cincinnati CMSA Hamilton 0. 081 0.9095 0.074 0.8969 0.073 391650006 Cincinnati CMSA Warren 0. 085 0.8851 0.075 0.8576 0.063 210150003 Cincinnati CMSA- KY Boone 0. 071 0.8478 0.060 0.8205 0.071 210371001 Cincinnati CMSA- KY Campbell 0.081 0.8804 0.073 0.8804 0.067 211170007 Cincinnati CMSA- KY Kenton 0. 078 0.8940 0.069 0.8787 0.074



### 7.3 U.S. EPA Modeling for Clean Ai r Interstate Rule (CAIR), 2005

On March 10, 2005, the U.S. EPA finalized CAIR. NO x 

### emissions from power plants will be cut by 1.7 million tons by 2009 and emissions will be reduced by 1.3 million tons in 2015 in 28 eastern states and the District of Columbia. Compared to a 2003 baseline, Indiana will reduce NO x 

### emissions by 113,000 tons by 2009 and 149,000 tons by 2015. To support this rulemaking, U.S. EPA first conducted a base case future year modeling run to show future year concentrations resulting from existing emissions controls and then conducted future year modeling with emission reductions a ttributed to CAIR. Results in Table 7.2 show what the base case modeled results without CAIR (base) and with CAIR’s emission reductions included. The modeling was based on 1999 – 2003 (1999-2001, 2000-2002 and 2001-2003) design values. Future year modeling was conducted, incl uding the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area, and the future year desi gn values for 2010 and 2015 were evaluated for attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Results of the base case future year modeling and future year modeling with CAIR show that th e area will attain the 8-hour ozone NAAQS in 2010 under both scenarios with modele d concentrations below 0.085 ppm and modeled concentrations decreasing further by 2015. On December 23, 2008, CAIR was remanded without vacatur by the D.C. Circuit Court.

### 32 Table 7.2 Modeling Results from U.S. EPA fo r the Clean Air Interstate Rule

County MSA/CMSA Design Value (ppm) Future Design Value (ppm) Future Design Value (ppm) 1999-2003 2010 Base 2010 CAIR 2015 Base 2015 CAIR Butler Cincinnati, OH – KY 0.0890 0.0782 0.0780 0.0752 0.0736 Clermont Cincinnati, OH – KY 0.0900 0.0781 0.0780 0.0751 0.0725 Clinton Cincinnati, OH – KY 0.0957 0.0817 0.0814 0.0774 0.0757 Hamilton Cincinnati, OH - KY 0.0893 0.0788 0.0786 0.0758 0.0743 Warren Cincinnati, OH – KY 0.0920 0.0802 0.0800 0.0766 0.0751 Boone Cincinnati, OH – KY 0.0853 0.0731 0.0731 0.0710 0.0680 Campbell Cincinnati, OH – KY 0.0925 0.0816 0.0815 0.0788 0.0768

Kenton Cincinnati, OH – KY 0.0863 0.0757 0.0756 0.0733 0.0713



### 7.4 LADCO’s Round 5 and Round 6 Mode ling for 8-Hour Ozone Standard

LADCO recently performed updated Comprehensiv e Air Quality Model (CAMx) modeling for ozone, referred to as “Round 5 and Round 6”, whic h used the most recent emissions inventories and model updates. This modeling was performe d to support attainment demonstrations for the five-state LADCO region. The photochemical model used by LADCO and Indiana for the 8- hour ozone standard analysis is CAMx, Versi on 4.5, developed by Environ. This model has been accepted by U.S. EPA as an approved air quality model for regulatory analysis and attainment demonstrations. Requirements of 40 CFR 51.112 as well as the “Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses in Attain ment Demonstrations for the 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS” (EPA-454/R-05-002, Oct. 2005) are satisfied with the use of CAMx for attainment demonstrations. Meteorology from 2005, as well as 2005 base year emissions, were used to conduct the modeling. The ozone m odeling metrics for bias, error, fractional bias, and fractional error met U.S. EPA modeling gu idance performance criteria. The base-year design value for attainment purposes was calculated from the periods 2003 - 2005, 2004 - 2006 and 2005 - 2007.

Round 5 modeling included several scenarios fo r attaining the ozone NAAQS. One scenario included the implementation of "on-the-books" contro ls for future years such as U.S. EPA motor vehicle and fuel standards with the inclus ion of CAIR. Round 6 modeling included the implementation of "on-the-books" controls, sim ilar to the Round 5 mode ling except without the inclusion of CAIR. The futu re years modeled were 2009, 2012 and 2018. Modeling results, in Table 7.3 and 7.4 below, show ozone concentr ations in the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area below the 8-hour ozone standard in 2009.

### 33 Table 7.3 Application of Round 5 RRFs (with CAIR) to Most Current Base-Year Design Values

2009 2012 2018

Monitor ID Site 2003-2007 Base DV 2009 RRF Future DV 2012 RRF Future DV 2018 RRF Future DV 390170004 Butler Co. - OH 0.0833 0.947 0.078 0.922 0.076 0.851 0.070
390171004 Butler Co. - OH 0.0823 0.95 0.078 0.925 0.076 0.853 0.070
390250022 Clermont Co. - OH 0.0810 0.962 0.077 0.941 0.076 0.877 0.071
390271002 Clinton Co. - OH 0.0823 0.941 0.077 0.910 0.074 0.830 0.068
390610006 Hamilton Co. - OH 0.0847 0.967 0.081 0.948 0.080 0.881 0.074
390610010 Hamilton Co. - OH 0.0820 0.955 0.078 0.934 0.076 0.878 0.071
390610040 Hamilton Co. - OH 0.0817 0.975 0.079 0.958 0.078 0.900 0.073
391650007 Warren Co. - OH 0.0877 0.947 0.083 0.921 0.080 0.846 0.074
210150003 Boone Co. - KY 0.0753 0.949 0.071 0.919 0.069 0.856 0.064 210370003 Campbell Co. – KY 0.0853 0.978 0.083 0.962 0.082 0.906 0.077
211170007 Kenton Co. - KY 0.0783 0.965 0.075 0.949 0.074 0.898 0.070



### Table 7.4 Application of Round 6 RRFs (without CAIR) to Most Current Base-Year Design Values

2009 2012 2018

Monitor ID Site 2003-2007 Base DV 2009 RRF Future DV 2012 RRF Future DV 2018 RRF Future DV 390170004 Butler Co. - OH 0.0833 0.947 0.0789 0.925 0.0771 0.868 0.0723
390171004 Butler Co. - OH 0.0823 0.948 0.0781 0.927 0.0763 0.868 0.0715
390250022 Clermont Co. - OH 0.0810 0.955 0.0774 0.939 0.0761 0.893 0.0723
390271002 Clinton Co. - OH 0.0823 0.94 0.0774 0.913 0.0752 0.849 0.0699
390610006 Hamilton Co. - OH 0.0847 0.962 0.0814 0.947 0.0802 0.898 0.0760
390610010 Hamilton Co. - OH 0.0820 0.953 0.0781 0.935 0.0767 0.892 0.0731
390610040 Hamilton Co. - OH 0.0817 0.964 0.0787 0.952 0.0777 0.912 0.0742
391650007 Warren Co. - OH 0.0877 0.944 0.0828 0.92 0.0807 0.857 0.0751
210150003 Boone Co. - KY 0.0753 0.945 0.0712 0.925 0.0697 0.878 0.0661 210370003 Campbell Co. – KY 0.0853 0.968 0.0829 0.957 0.0817 0.920 0.0785
211170007 Kenton Co. - KY 0.0783 0.961 0.0753 0.948 0.0743 0.912 0.0714



### 7.5 Summary of Existing Modeling Results

U.S. EPA and LADCO modeling sh ows that existing national emi ssion control measures have brought counties in the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area into attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Rulemakings to be implemented in the next several years will provide even greater assurance that air quality will co ntinue to meet the standard into the future. Modeling support for the NO x 

### SIP Call, Heavy Duty Engine a nd Highway Diesel Fuel, and Tier II/Low Sulfur Fuel and CAIR has shown future y ear design values for counties in the CincinnatiHamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area will attain the ozone standard with modeled future year design values below 0.085 ppm. Review of the design values of the ozone monitors in the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area show an overall decline in ozone concentrations, as indicated by the trend lin e for the ozone monitor (390610006) in Hamilton County, Ohio with the highest design value for 2006-2008.

### 34 Graph 7.1 Actual Design Values for Cincinnati Nonattainment Area from 1996 through 2008

0.06 0.065 0.07 0.075 0.08 0.085 0.09 0.095

0.1 0.105 0.11

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 390170004

390171004

390250020

390250022

390271002

390610006

390610010

390610037

390610040

391650002

391650006

391650007

210150003

210371001

210373002

210370003

211170007 Linear (390610006)



### On December 23, 2008, CAIR was remanded wit hout vacatur by the D.C. Circuit Court. U.S. EPA has modeled base case future years with ex isting emission controls only and shown that counties in the Cincinnati-Ham ilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area will attain the 8-hour ozone NAAQS without proposed additional national emission control strategi es. The application of the most current relative res ponse factors from LADCO’s Round 5 and Round 6 modeling demonstrates that the area will continue to attain the standard into the future with or without implementation of CAIR. Future national and loca l emission control strate gies will ensure that each county’s attainment will be maintained with an increasing margin of safety over time.

7.6 Temperature Analysis for the Cincinnati, Ohio Area

Meteorological conditions are one of the most important factors that influence ozone development and transport. A temperature an alysis was conducted to determine how the temperatures during the ozone c onducive months of April, May, June, July, August, September and October compare to normal temperatures fo r the Cincinnati area for the years 1971 through 2000. Temperature information was taken from the National Weather Service Station at Cincinnati Municipal Airport Lunken Field. Normal maximu m temperatures from 1971-2000 for the Cincinnati area are as follows:

May – 74.8 o 

### F June – 82.7 o 

### F July – 86.7 o 

### F August – 85.1 o 

### F September – 78.7 o 

### F May - September – 81.6 o 

### F

### 35 Monthly maximum temperatures for the prev ious 10 years (1999 – 2008) during the summer months are compared to norma l summer month temperatures in Table 7.5. Overall, the temperatures during the 1999, 2002, 2003, 2005 and 2007 summer months of May, June, July, August and September were 1% to 6% above normal while temperatures during the 2000, 2001, 2004, 2006 and 2008 summer months were at normal to 3% lower than the normal temperatures. Table 7.5 shows the average temperatures in the Cincinnati area for each of the past ten years and the percent difference from normal for each year.

Table 7.5 Analysis of Maximum Temperatures for the Cincinnati, Ohio Area (Percent Change from Maximum Temperature ( o 

### F) Normals (1971 – 2000))

Normal 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Max Max % Max % Max % Max % Max % May 74.8 75.7 +1 75.6 +1 75.1 0 70.5 -6 70.5 -6
June 82.7 83.6 +1 81.2 -2 80.1 -3 83.1 0 83.1 0 July 86.7 89.9 +4 81.9 -6 83.9 -3 89.0 +3 89.0 +3 August 85.1 83.9 -1 81.4 -4 83.8 -2 88.0 +3 88.0 +3 September 78.7 81.9 +4 74.9 -5 74.5 -5 82.8 +5 82.8 +5
AVE 81.6 83 +2 79.0 -3 79.5 -3 82.7 +1 82.7 +1

Normal 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Max Max % Max % Max % Max % Max % May 74.8 76.5 +2 71.6 -4 71.9 -4 79.9 +7 71.1 -5 June 82.7 80.4 -3 85.3 +3 80.1 -3 85.6 +4 83.8 +1 July 86.7 82.3 -5 86.5 0 86.7 0 85.8 -1 84.9 -2 August 85.1 80.2 -6 87.5 +3 87 +2 93.6 +10 85.4 0 September 78.7 79 0 81.6 +4 73.1 -7 85.7 +9 82.4 +5 AVE. 81.6 79.7 -2 82.5 +1 79.8 -2 86.1 +6 81.5 0



### The number of days with temperatures of 90 o 

### F and higher were collected from the National Weather Service Station at Cinc innati Municipal Airport Lunken Field and compared to the average number of days from 1998 through 200 8 as well as the number of 8-hour ozone exceedance days. Table 7.6 shows this compar ison of 8-hour ozone exceedance days and number of 90 o 

### F temperature days while Graph 7. 2 shows the correlation graphically.

### 36 Table 7.6 Comparison of Days with 90 o 

### F and 8-Hour Ozone Exceedance Days 1998- 2008 Number of Days with Temperatures of 90 o F and higher

Site County Ave. 90 o F Days 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Cincinnati, OH Hamilton Co. 21.2 15 33 4 9 37 Number of 8-Hour Exceedance Days at Cinc innati Nonattainment area ozone monitors

Monitor County 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

390170004 Butler Co 18 28 9 17 29 390171004 Butler Co 33 37 10 16 33 390250020 Clermont Co 30 42 15 N/O N/O 390250022 Clermont Co N/O N/O N/O 14 28 390271002 Clinton Co 35 45 17 24 35 390610006 Hamilton Co 21 22 6 13 33 390610010 Hamilton Co 22 15 6 8 24 390610040 Hamilton Co N/O 24 10 13 29 391650006 Warren Co 33 34 11 14 33 391650007 Warren Co N/O N/O N/O N/O N/O 210150003 Boone Co 18 22 6 9 21 210371001 Campbell Co 22 21 N/O N/O N/O 210373002 Campbell Co N/O N/O N/O N/O N/O 210370003 Campbell Co N/O N/O 12 19 38 211170007 Kenton Co 22 28 9 12 32

Number of Days with Temperatures of 90 o F and higher

Site County Ave. 90 o F Days 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Cincinnati, OH Hamilton Co. 21.2 5 4 30 25 39 32

Number of 8-Hour Exceedance Days at Cinc innati Nonattainment area ozone monitors

Monitor County 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

390170004 Butler Co 17 3 22 11 20 1 390171004 Butler Co 17 5 24 4 27 7 390250020 Clermont Co N/O N/O N/O N/O N/O N/O 390250022 Clermont Co 8 4 16 7 17 0 390271002 Clinton Co 16 6 23 10 21 4 390610006 Hamilton Co 18 4 22 9 33 12 390610010 Hamilton Co 12 3 19 10 23 7 390610040 Hamilton Co 10 4 20 8 15 7 391650006 Warren Co 2 N/O N/O N/O N/O N/O 391650007 Warren Co 18 10 24 12 32 11 210150003 Boone Co 5 1 8 0 6 0 210371001 Campbell Co N/O N/O N/O N/O N/O N/O 210373002 Campbell Co N/O N/O N/O N/O 19 2 210370003 Campbell Co 8 5 23 N/O N/O N/O 211170007 Kenton Co 8 2 12 3 12 2 N/O – Not Operational

### 37 Graph 7.2 Comparison of Days with 90 o 

### F and 8-Hour Ozone Exceedance Days

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

YearNumber of Days 90o F Days

390170004

390171004

390250020

390250022

390271002

390610006

390610010

390610037

390610040

391650006

391650007

210150003

210371001

210373002

210370003

211170007



### As can be seen, a greater number of ozone excee dance days per year correlate with a greater number of 90 o 

### F days per year. The effects of nationa l control measures appear to have an impact on the number of ozone exceedance days pe r year. This is evident in that 2005 had a greater number of days with temperatures of 90 o 

### F or more but the number of 8-hour exceedance days was lower. While other me teorological factors may have infl uenced this result to some degree, it appears that the lower emissions helped to k eep the number of 8-hour ozone exceedance days lower during the ozone-conduciv e conditions of 2005. In 2007, there were 39 days of 90 o 

### F or more and three monitors with the number of 8-hour ozone exceedance days over 25. In 2002 there were 37 days of 90 o 

### F or more and nine monitors with the number of 8-hour ozone exceedance days over 25. There were si milar meteorological conditions in 2002 and 2007 and less monitors had days over the 8-hour oz one standard in 2007, indicating that emission reductions are decreasing ozone concentrations in the area.

7.7 Summary of Meteorological Conditions

The analysis of the departure from normal of the maximum temperatur es during the summer months shows variation as illustrated in Table 7.6 and Graph 7.2. The analysis shows that 15 or more days with temperatures of 90 o 

### F and higher occurred in 1998, 1999, 2002, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. The number of 8-hour ozone exceedance days for those years shows a greater correlation to the number of higher temperature da ys. However, the years with a lesser number of 90 o 

### F days still yielded 8-hour ozone exceedance days. For example, 2000 and 2001 had fewer than the normal amount of 90 o 

### F days; however, there were st ill a significant number of 8- hour ozone exceedances for those years. In co mparison, 2004 was a cooler year, but due to national emission reduction measures in effect , there were fewer ozone exceedances. Lower ozone values correspond to lowered local and re gional ozone precursor em issions despite ozone

### 38 conducive conditions. The 8-hour ozone standard, e xpressed as a 4th high ozone value averaged over 3 years, accounts for variations in temperature. Despite such variations, ozone values in the Cincinnati nonattainment area ha ve steadily decreased since 1998.

8.0 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

8.1 Commitment to Revise Plan

As noted in Section 4.6 above, Indiana commits to review its Maintenanc e Plan eight (8) years after redesignation, as require d by Section 175A of the CAA.

8.2 Commitment for Contingency Measures

Indiana hereby commits to adopt and expeditiously implement necessary corrective actions in the following circumstances:

Warning Level Response: A Warning Level Response shall be prompted whenever an annual (1-year) fourth high monitored value of 0.089 ppm occurs in a sing le ozone season, or a two (2)-year average fourth high monitored value of 0.085 ppm or great er occurs within the maintenance area. A Warning Level Response will consist of a study to determine whether the ozone value indicates a trend toward hi gher ozone values or whether emissions appear to be increasing. The study will evaluate whether the trend, if any, is likely to continue and, if so, the control measures necessary to revers e the trend taking into consideration ease and timing for implementation, as well as economic and social considerations. Implementation of necessary controls in re sponse to a Warning Level Response trigger will take place as expeditiously as possible, bu t in no event later than twelve (12) months from the conclusion of the most recent ozone season (September 30). Should it be determined through the Warning Level study that action is necessary to reverse the noted trend, the procedures for control selecti on and implementation outlined under “Action Level Response” shall be followed.

Action Level Response An Action Level Response shall be prompted wh enever a violation of the standard (three (3)-year average fourth high monitored value of 0.085 ppm or greater) occurs within the maintenance area. In the event that the Acti on Level is triggered and is not found to be due to an exceptional event, malfunction, or noncompliance with a permit condition or rule requirement, IDEM will determine additional control measures needed to assure future attainment of the NAAQS for ozone. In this case, measures that can be implemented in a short time will be selected and be in place within eighteen (18) months from the close of the ozone season that prompted the Action Level.

### 39 Control Measure Selection and Implementation Adoption of any additional control measures is subject to the necessary administrative and legal process. This process will include publication of notices, an opportunity for public hearing and other measures require d by Indiana law for rulemaking by state environmental boards.

If a new measure/control is al ready promulgated and scheduled to be implemented at the federal or state level, and that measure/contro l is determined to be sufficient to address the upward trend in air quality, additional local measures may be unnecessary. Furthermore, Indiana will submit to U.S. EP A an analysis to demonstrate the proposed measures are adequate to re turn the area to attainment.

8.3 Contingency Measures

Contingency measures to be considered will be se lected from a comprehensive list of measures deemed appropriate and effective at the time the selection is made. Listed below are example

measures that may be considered. The selec tion of measures w ill be based upon costeffectiveness, emission reduction po tential, economic and social c onsiderations, or other factors that IDEM and U.S. EPA deem a ppropriate. IDEM will solicit input from interested and affected persons in the maintenance area prior to selecting appropriate c ontingency measures. All of the listed contingency measures are potentially effect ive or proven methods of obtaining significant reductions of ozone precursor emissions. Because it is not possible at this time to determine what control measure will be a ppropriate at an unspecified ti me in the future, the list of contingency measures outlined below is not comprehensive. Indiana anticipates that if contingency measures should ever be necessary, it is unlikely th at a significant number (i.e., all those listed below) will be required.

1. Installation of a vehicle emissions testing program 2. Asphalt paving (lower VOC formulation) 3. Diesel exhaust retrofits 4. Traffic flow improvements 5. Idle reduction programs 6. Portable fuel containe r regulation (statewide) 7. Park and ride facilities 8. Rideshare/carpool program 9. VOC cap/trade program for ma jor stationary sources 10. Commercial/consumer solvents (statewide) 11. NO x 

### Reasonably Availabl e Control Technology

No contingency measure shall be implemented w ithout providing the opportunity for full public participation during which the relative costs and be nefits of individual meas ures, at the time they are under consideration, can be fully evaluated.

### 40 9.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

This section will be completed upon conclusi on of the public participation process.

10.0 CONCLUSIONS

Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County, Indian a, along with the rema ining portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment ar ea, has attained the NAAQS standard for ozone. This petition demonstrates that La wrenceburg Township in Dearborn County has complied with the applicable provisions of the CAA regarding redesignation of ozone nonattainment areas. IDEM has prepared a Re designation Request and Maintenance Plan that meets the requirement of Section 11 0(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act.

Indiana has performed an analysis that shows the air quality imp rovements are due to permanent and enforceable measures and that significant regional NO x 

### reductions will ensure continued compliance (maintenance) with the standard. Additionally, Indiana has ensured that all CAA requirements necessary to support redesignation have been met.

In addition to the corrective actions (should they be necessary) outlined in this submittal, Indiana continues to participate in the regional air quality planning e fforts sponsored by LADCO. The current goal of the planning process is to establis h a regional control strategy that provides for attainment of the ozone and fine particle sta ndards throughout the states of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin. Along with th e other LADCO states, Indiana is developing local and statewide emission control measures , where photochemical modeling and culpability analyses demonstrate a clear need and cost effectiveness analyses justify the implementation of such measures. These actions will provide fo r an even greater margin of safety for the Cincinnati, Ohio area and ensure conti nued maintenance well into the future.

Based on this presentation, Indi ana’s portion of the nonattainmen t area (Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County) meets the requirements for redesignatio n under Section 107(d)(3) of the CAA and U.S. EPA guidance. Furthermore, because this area is subject to transport, additional regional NO x 

### and VOC reductions will ensure conti nued compliance (maintenance) with the standards and provide an in creased margin of safety.

Consistent with the authority granted to the U.S. EPA under Section 107(d)(3) of the CAA, Indiana requests that Lawrence burg Township in Dearborn County be redesignated to attainment simultaneously with U.S. EPA approval of th e Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan provisions contained herein.

# APPENDIX A

Air Quality System (AQS) Monitor Data Values for Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area (2004-2009)

### This page left intentionally blank.

### A - 1 

## DRAFT AQS Monitoring Data for Kentucky’s portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area

KENTUCKY

8-HOUR Ozone (44201)

(PARTS PER MILLION)

VALID NUM 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH DAY

DAYS DAYS MAX MAX MAX MAX MAX

> SITE ID POC PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH %OBS MEAS REQ 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR 0.075 CERT

21-015-0003 1 584 Not in a city Boone KY 338 & LOWER RIVER ROAD 2004 53 100 245 245 0.077 0.071 0.07 0.07 1 Y

21-015-0003 1 584 Not in a city Boone KY 338 & LOWER RIVER ROAD 2005 0 95 233 245 0.082 0.082 0.082 0.082 8 Y

21-015-0003 1 584 Not in a city Boone KY 338 & LOWER RIVER ROAD 2006 87 100 244 245 0.072 0.072 0.072 0.071 0

21-015-0003 1 584 Not in a city Boone KY 338 & LOWER RIVER ROAD 2007 87 100 245 245 0.081 0.079 0.078 0.078 6

21-015-0003 1 584 Not in a city Boone KY 338 & LOWER RIVER ROAD 2008 87 98 241 245 0.065 0.064 0.064 0.064 0 Y

21-015-0003 1 584 Not in a city Boone KY 338 & LOWER RIVER ROAD 2009 87 23 57 245 0.063 0.059 0.059 0.059 0

21-037-3002 1 584 Highland Heights Campbell 524A John Hill Road 2007 87 100 123 123 0.095 0.092 0.088 0.086 19

21-037-3002 1 584 Highland Heights Campbell 524A John Hill Road 2008 87 99 242 245 0.084 0.083 0.075 0.075 2 Y

21-037-3002 1 584 Highland Heights Campbell 524A John Hill Road 2009 87 25 61 245 0.062 0.058 0.056 0.055 0

21-117-0007 1 584 Covington Kenton 1401 DIXIE HWY, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE 2004 53 95 232 245 0.081 0.076 0.075 0.073 2

21-117-0007 1 584 Covington Kenton 1401 DIXIE HWY, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE 2005 0 99 242 245 0.091 0.088 0.087 0.084 12 Y

21-117-0007 1 584 Covington Kenton 1401 DIXIE HWY, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE 2006 87 97 238 245 0.082 0.081 0.079 0.075 3

21-117-0007 1 584 Covington Kenton 1401 DIXIE HWY, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE 2007 87 100 244 245 0.093 0.089 0.085 0.085 12

21-117-0007 1 584 Covington Kenton 1401 DIXIE HWY, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE 2008 87 99 242 245 0.08 0.077 0.074 0.073 2 Y

21-117-0007 1 584 Covington Kenton 1401 DIXIE HWY, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE 2009 87 25 61 245 0.068 0.06 0.056 0.055 0

### A - 2 

## DRAFTAQS Monitoring Data for Ohio’s portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton OHKY-IN Nonattainment Area

OHIO 8-HOUR Ozone (44201) (PARTS PER MILLION) VALID NUM 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH DAY

DAYS DAYS MAX MAX MAX MAX MAX

>

SITE ID POC PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH %O BS MEAS REQ 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR 0.075 CERT

39-017-0004 1 1259 Hamilton Butler SCHULER AND BENDER 2004 87 100 214 214 0.09 0.081 0.078 0.075 3 Y

39-017-0004 1 1259 Hamilton Butler SCHULER AND BENDER 2005 87 100 213 214 0.098 0.098 0.088 0.086 22 Y

39-017-0004 1 1259 Hamilton Butler SCHULER AND BENDER 2006 87 99 212 214 0.087 0.082 0.082 0.079 11 Y

39-017-0004 1 1259 Hamilton Butler SCHULER AND BENDER 2007 87 100 214 214 0.097 0.096 0.091 0.091 20

39-017-0004 1 1259 Hamilton Butler SCHULER AND BENDER 2008 87 99 211 214 0.089 0.075 0.072 0.071 1 Y

39-017-0004 1 1259 Hamilton Butler SCHULER AND BENDER 2009 87 41 88 214 0.079 0.078 0.074 0.073 2

39-017-1004 3 1259 Middletown Butler HOOK FIELD AIRPORT 2004 56 100 213 214 0.087 0.079 0.078 0.076 5 Y

39-017-1004 3 1259 Middletown Butler HOOK FIELD AIRPORT 2005 56 100 213 214 0.106 0.091 0.089 0.088 24 Y

39-017-1004 3 1259 Middletown Butler HOOK FIELD AIRPORT 2006 87 100 213 214 0.085 0.084 0.077 0.076 4 Y

39-017-1004 3 1259 Middletown Butler HOOK FIELD AIRPORT 2007 87 100 214 214 0.104 0.097 0.095 0.091 27

39-017-1004 3 1259 Middletown Butler HOOK FIELD AIRPORT 2008 0 96 205 214 0.091 0.087 0.082 0.079 7 Y

39-017-1004 3 1259 Middletown Butler HOOK FIELD AIRPORT 2009 87 43 91 214 0.078 0.076 0.076 0.076 4

39-025-0022 1 1259 Batavia Clermont 2400 CLERMONT CNTR. 2004 0 99 212 214 0.082 0.077 0.076 0.076 4 Y

39-025-0022 1 1259 Batavia Clermont 2400 CLERMONT CNTR 2005 87 99 211 214 0.089 0.087 0.083 0.083 16 Y

39-025-0022 1 1259 Batavia Clermont 2400 CLERMONT CNTR. 2006 87 99 212 214 0.087 0.081 0.077 0.077 7 Y

39-025-0022 1 1259 Batavia Clermont 2400 CLERMONT CNTR. 2007 0 98 209 214 0.093 0.092 0.09 0.086 17

39-025-0022 1 1259 Batavia Clermont 2400 CLERMONT CNTR. 2008 87 97 207 214 0.072 0.071 0.071 0.071 0 Y

39-025-0022 1 1259 Batavia Clermont 2400 CLERMONT CNTR 2009 87 42 90 214 0.071 0.071 0.069 0.069 0

39-027-1002 1 810 Wilmington Clinton 62 LAUREL DR. 2004 47 100 214 214 0.087 0.081 0.081 0.078 6 Y

39-027-1002 1 810 Wilmington Clinton 62 LAUREL DR. 2005 47 100 213 214 0.097 0.095 0.093 0.083 23 Y

39-027-1002 1 810 Wilmington Clinton 62 LAUREL DR. 2006 47 100 214 214 0.09 0.085 0.084 0.081 10 Y

39-027-1002 1 810 Wilmington Clinton 62 LAUREL DR. 2007 47 99 212 214 0.091 0.089 0.085 0.082 21

39-027-1002 1 810 Wilmington Clinton 62 LAUREL DR. 2008 47 96 206 214 0.087 0.08 0.077 0.076 4 Y

39-027-1002 1 810 Wilmington Clinton 62 LAUREL DR. 2009 47 40 86 214 0.073 0.072 0.071 0.07 0

39-061-0006 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 11590 GROOMS RD 2004 0 98 210 214 0.084 0.078 0.076 0.076 4 Y

39-061-0006 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 11590 GROOMS RD 2005 87 100 214 214 0.101 0.095 0.095 0.089 22 Y

39-061-0006 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 11590 GROOMS RD 2006 87 100 213 214 0.084 0.084 0.082 0.081 9 Y

39-061-0006 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 11590 GR OOMS RD 2007 87 96 206 214 0.1 0.092 0.091 0.089 33

39-061-0006 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 11590 GROOMS RD 2008 87 97 208 214 0.093 0.089 0.087 0.086 12 Y

39-061-0006 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 11590 GR OOMS RD 2009 87 43 91 214 0.08 0.076 0.075 0.072 2

39-061-0010 1 1259 Cleves Hamilton 6950 RIPPLE RD. 2004 19 100 214 214 0.085 0.084 0.077 0.075 3 Y

39-061-0010 1 1259 Cleves Hamilton 6950 RIPPLE RD. 2005 19 100 214 214 0.113 0.093 0.087 0.085 19 Y

39-061-0010 1 1259 Cleves Hamilton 6950 RIPPLE RD. 2006 0 100 213 214 0.098 0.092 0.082 0.081 10 Y

39-061-0010 1 1259 Cleves Hamilton 6950 RIPPLE RD. 2007 87 99 212 214 0.093 0.091 0.088 0.086 23

39-061-0010 1 1259 Cleves Hamilton 6950 RIPPLE RD. 2008 87 96 205 214 0.085 0.079 0.078 0.077 7 Y

39-061-0010 1 1259 Cleves Hamilton 6950 RIPPLE RD. 2009 87 25 53 214 0.065 0.065 0.064 0.059 0

39-061-0040 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 250 WM. HOWARD TAFT 2004 56 100 213 214 0.078 0.078 0.077 0.076 4 Y

39-061-0040 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 250 WM. HOWARD TAFT 2005 0 98 209 214 0.095 0.091 0.09 0.087 20 Y

39-061-0040 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 250 WM. HOWARD TAFT 2006 87 99 212 214 0.089 0.08 0.079 0.078 8 Y

39-061-0040 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 250 WM. HOWARD TAFT 2007 0 99 212 214 0.097 0.093 0.088 0.086 15

39-061-0040 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 250 WM. HOWARD TAFT 2008 87 100 213 214 0.086 0.083 0.081 0.08 7 Y

39-061-0040 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 250 WM. HOWARD TAFT 2009 87 43 91 214 0.077 0.076 0.074 0.074 2

39-165-0007 1 1259 Lebanon Warren 416 SOUTHEAST ST. 2004 56 100 213 214 0.087 0.085 0.083 0.081 10 Y

39-165-0007 1 1259 Lebanon Warren 416 SOUTHEAST ST. 2005 0 98 210 214 0.101 0.101 0.096 0.092 24 Y

39-165-0007 1 1259 Lebanon Warren 416 SOUTHEAST ST. 2006 87 100 214 214 0.092 0.09 0.088 0.086 12 Y

39-165-0007 1 1259 Lebanon Warren 416 SOUTHEAST ST. 2007 87 100 214 214 0.103 0.089 0.088 0.088 32

39-165-0007 1 1259 Lebanon Warren 416 SOUTHEAST ST. 2008 0 95 204 214 0.092 0.087 0.084 0.082 11 Y

39-165-0007 1 1259 Lebanon Warren 416 SOUTHEAST ST. 2009 87 43 91 214 0.08 0.08 0.078 0.077 4

### A - 3 

## DRAFT AQS Monitoring Data for Entire Nonattainment Area

State County Site ID Site Name Three Year Design Values (ppm)
04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09 Kentucky Boone 21-015-0003 KY 338 0.074 0.077 0.071 0.067 Kentucky Campbell 31-037-3002 Highland Heights 0.072 Kentucky Kenton 21-117-0007 Covington 0.077 0.081 0.078 0.071
Ohio Butler 39-017-0004 Hamilton 0.080 0.085 0.080 0.078
Ohio Butler 39-017-1004 Middletown 0.080 0.085 0.082 0.082
Ohio Clermont 39-025-0022 Batavia 0.079 0.082 0.078 0.075 Ohio Clinton 39-027-1002 Wilmington 0.081 0.082 0.080 0.076
Ohio Hamilton 39-061-0006 Cincinnati-Grooms Rd 0.082 0.086 0.085 0.082
Ohio Hamilton 39-061-0010 Cleves 0.080 0.084 0.081 0.074
Ohio Hamilton 39-061-0040 Cincinnati-Wm. Howard Taft 0.080 0.084 0.081 0.080
Ohio Warren 39-165-0007 Lebanon 0.086 0.089 0.085 0.082 Value greater than or equal to 0.085 ppm State County Site ID Site Name 4 th High Values (ppm)
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Kentucky Boone 21-015-0003 KY 338 0.070 0.082 0.071 0.078 0.064 0.059 Kentucky Campbell 21-037-3002 Highland Heights 0.086 0.075 0.055 Kentucky Kenton 21-117-0007 Covington 0.073 0.084 0.075 0.085 0.073 0.055
Ohio Butler 39-017-0004 Hamilton 0.075 0.086 0.079 0.091 0.071 0.073
Ohio Butler 39-017-1004 Middletown 0.076 0.088 0.076 0.091 0.079 0.076
Ohio Clermont 39-025-0022 Batavia 0.076 0.083 0.077 0.086 0.071 0.069 Ohio Clinton 39-027-1002 Wilmington 0.078 0.083 0.081 0.082 0.076 0.070
Ohio Hamilton 39-061-0006 Cincinnati-Grooms Rd 0.076 0.089 0.081 0.089 0.086 0.072
Ohio Hamilton 39-061-0010 Cleves 0.075 0.085 0.081 0.086 0.077 0.059
Ohio Hamilton 39-061-0040 Cincinnati-Wm. Howard Taft 0.076 0.087 0.078 0.086 0.080 0.074
Ohio Warren 39-165-0007 Lebanon 0.081 0.092 0.086 0.088 0.082 0.077 Value greater than or equal to 0.085 ppm

### A - 4 DRAFT 2007-2009 Design Values for the Ci ncinnati-Hamilto n OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area

0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040 0.050 0.060 0.070 0.080 0.090

KY 338, KY Highland Heights, KY Covington,
KY Hamilton, OH Middletow n, OH Batavia, OH Wilmington, OH Cincinnati, OH-Grooms
Rd. Cleves, OH Cincinnati, OH-WM.
How ard Taft
Rd. Lebanon, OH

21-015-0003 21-037-3002 21-117-0007 39-017-0004 39-017-1004 39-025-0022 39-027-1002 39-061-0006 39-061-0010 39-061-0040 39-165-0007Parts per Million

2007-2009 8-Hour Ozone Standard



### DRAFT Design Value Trends in the Cincinnati -Hamilton OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area, 2004-2009

0.060 0.065 0.070 0.075 0.080 0.085 0.090 0.095

04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09Parts per Million 21-015-0003 KY 338, KY

21-037-3002 Highland Heights, KY

21-117-0007 Covington, KY

39-017-0004 Hamilton, OH

39-017-1004 Middletow n, OH

39-025-0022 Batavia, OH

39-027-1002 Wilmington, OH

39-061-0006 Cincinnati, OH-Grooms Rd.

39-061-0010 Cleves, OH

39-061-0040 Cincinnati, OH-WM. How ard Taft Rd.
39-165-0007 Lebanon, OH

8-Hour Ozone Standard

# APPENDIX B

Nitrogen Oxides (NO x 

# ) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Point Source Emissions, 2005 and 2008, for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County Indiana and Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area

### This page left intentionally blank.

### B-1 Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana Point Source Emission Totals (Tons per Day)
Year NO x VOC

2005 30.40 3.24 2008 30.55 3.58

2005 Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana Point Source Emission Totals (EGU vs Non EGU) (Tons per Day) EGU-NOx NON EGU-NOx EGU-VOC NON-EGU-VOC Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 25.31 5.09 0.33 2.91

Total NOx 30.40 Total VOC 3.24

2005 Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana Point Source Inventory (Tons per Day) Facility Name NOX VOC Aurora Casket Company Inc. 0.01 1.25 American Electric Power-Tanners Creek 25.31 0.32 Pernod Ricard USA 1.34 1.33 Anchor Glass Container Corporation 1.29 0.05 Texas Gas Transmission- Dillsboro 1. 81 0.07 Aurora Casket Company-Vanguard Plant 0.00 0.20 Trans Agg, Inc. DBA Gibbco, Inc. 0.00 0.01 PSEG Lawrenceburg Energy Co mpany, Inc. 0.64 0.01
Total 30.40 3.24

### B-2 2008 Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana Point Source Emission Totals (EGU vs Non EGU) (Tons per Day) EGU-NOx NON EGU-NOx EGU-VOC NON-EGU-VOC Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 27.34 3.21 0.35 3.23

Total NOx 30.55 Total VOC 3.58

2008 Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana Point Source Inventory (Tons per Day) Facility Name NOX VOC Aurora Casket Company Inc. 0.01 1.23 American Electric Power-Tanners Creek 27.34 0.35 Pernod Ricard USA 1.16 1.92 Anchor Glass Container Corporation 0.85 0.02 Texas Gas Transmission- Dillsboro 0. 86 0.03 Aurora Casket Company-Vanguard Plant 0.02 0.03 Trans Agg, Inc. DBA Gibbco, Inc. 0.00 0.00 PSEG Lawrenceburg Energy Co mpany, Inc. 0.31 0.00
Total 30.55 3.58

### B-3 NO x 

### Point Source Emissions, Lawren ceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana, 2005-2008

30.00 30.20 30.40 30.60 30.80 31.00

2005 2008



### YearTons Per Summer Day



### NOx



### VOC Point Source Emissions, Lawrencebur g Township, Dearborn County, Indiana, 2005-2008

- 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00

2005 2008 

### YearTons Per Summer Day



### VOC

### B-4 This page left intentionally blank

### B-5 Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area Point Source Emission Totals (Tons per Day)
Year NO x VOC

2005 138.03 15.13 2008 147.14 14.79

2005 Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area Point Source Emission Totals (EGU vs Non EGU) (Tons per Day) EGU-NOx NON EGU-NOx EGU-VOC NON-EGU-VOC Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 25.31 5.09 0.33 2.91
Boone County, Kentucky 23. 80 0.14 0.17 2.40 Campbell County, Kentucky 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 Kenton County, Kentucky 0.00 0.04 0.00 1.20 Butler County, Ohio 3.88 12.03 0.03 3.64 Clermont County, Ohio 42.96 0.15 0.49 0.24 Clinton County, Ohio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hamilton County, Ohio 15.23 6.72 0.28 2.66 Warren County, Ohio 0.00 2.68 0.00 0.53 Total NOx 138.03 Total VOC 15.13

2008 Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area Point Source Emission Totals (EGU vs Non EGU) (Tons per Day) EGU-NOx NON EGU-NOx EGU-VOC NON-EGU-VOC Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 27.34 3.21 0.35 3.23
Boone County, Kentucky 23. 15 0.12 0.17 2.64 Campbell County, Kentucky 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.28 Kenton County, Kentucky 0.00 0.03 0.00 1.17 Butler County, Ohio 1.34 10.53 0.02 2.77 Clermont County, Ohio 44.65 0.18 0.20 0.09 Clinton County, Ohio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hamilton County, Ohio 27.26 6.17 0.20 2.85 Warren County, Ohio 0.00 3.14 0.00 0.82 Total NOx 147.14 Total VOC 14.79

### B-6 NO x 

### Point Source Emissions, En tire Nonattainment Area, 2005-2008

30.00 50.00 70.00 90.00 110.00 130.00 150.00 170.00 190.00

2005 2008


### YearTons Per Summer Day



### NOx



### VOC Point Source Emissions, Entire Nonattainment Area, 2005-2008

- 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00

2005 2008 

### YearTons Per Summer Day



### VOC

# APPENDIX C

Nitrogen Oxides (NO x 

# ) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) All Emission Sources, 2005 and 2008, for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana and Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area

### This page left intentionally blank.

### C-1 Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana All Anthropogenic Source Emission Totals (Tons per Day) Year NOx VOC

2005 33.36 7.13
2008 33.09 7.49



### NO x 

### Emissions Trends, 2005-2008, All Anthropogenic Sources in Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County

31.00 32.00 33.00 34.00 35.00

2005 2008 

### YearTons Per Summer Day



### NOx 2005 Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana All Anthropogenic Sources (Tons per Day)

AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL
NOX 0.26 1.26 1.44 30.40 33.36 VOC 2.07 0.82 1.00 3.24 7.13

2008 Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana All Anthropogenic Sources (Tons per Day)

AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL
NOX 0.26 1.14 1.14 30.55 33.09 VOC 2.42 0.74 0.75 3.58 7.49

### C-2 VOC Emissions Trends, 2005-2008, All Anthropogenic Sources in Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County

6.90 7.00 7.10 7.20 7.30 7.40 7.50 7.60

2005 2008 YearTons Per Summer Day



### VOC

### C-3 Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area All Anthropogenic Source Emission Totals (Tons per Day) Year NOx VOC

2005
2008



### NO x 

### Emissions Trends, 2005-2008, All Anthropogenic Sources-Entire Nonattainment Area

200.00 250.00 300.00 350.00 400.00

2005 2008 

### YearTons Per Summer Day



### NOx 2005 Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area All Anthropogenic Sources (Tons per Day)

AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL
NOX
VOC

2008 Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area All Anthropogenic Sources (Tons per Day)

AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL
NOX
VOC

### C-4 VOC Emissions Trends, 2005-2008, All Anthropogenic Sources-Entire Nonattainment Area

170.00 175.00 180.00 185.00 190.00 195.00 200.00 205.00 210.00 215.00 220.00



### 2005 2008 YearTons Per Summer Day



### VOC

### C-5 2005 Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area All Anthropogenic Sources (Tons per Day) State County Sector NOX VOC
Indiana Dearborn County AREA 0.26 2.07 Indiana Dearborn County NONROAD 1.26 0.82 Indiana Dearborn County ONROAD 1.44 1.00 Indiana Dearborn County EGU 25.31 0.33 Indiana Dearborn County POINT 5.09 2.91 Kentucky Boone County AREA 4.99 8.13 Kentucky Boone County NONROAD 12.96 1.71 Kentucky Boone County ONROAD 10.27 4.33 Kentucky Boone County EGU 23.80 0.17 Kentucky Boone County POINT 0.14 2.40 Kentucky Campbell County AREA 1.41 4.77 Kentucky Campbell County NONROAD 6.33 1.76 Kentucky Campbell County ONROAD 5.98 2.52 Kentucky Campbell County EGU 0.00 0.00 Kentucky Campbell County POINT 0.00 0.25 Kentucky Kenton County AREA 4.17 8.53 Kentucky Kenton County NONROAD 8.43 2.33 Kentucky Kenton County ONROAD 10.39 4.32 Kentucky Kenton County EGU 0.00 0.00 Kentucky Kenton County POINT 0.04 1.20

Ohio Butler County AREA 2.15 11.96 Ohio Butler County NONROAD 10.25 6.88 Ohio Butler County ONROAD 18.80 9.94 Ohio Butler County EGU 3.88 0.03 Ohio Butler County POINT 12.03 3.64 Ohio Clermont County AREA 1.65 6.98 Ohio Clermont County NONROAD 5.03 4.33 Ohio Clermont County ONROAD 13.04 6.86 Ohio Clermont County EGU 42.96 0.49 Ohio Clermont County POINT 0.15 0.24 Ohio Clinton County AREA 0.42 3.24 Ohio Clinton County NONROAD 2.26 1.77 Ohio Clinton County ONROAD 5.07 3.02 Ohio Clinton County EGU 0.00 0.00 Ohio Clinton County POINT 0.00 0.00 Ohio Hamilton County AREA 5.19 33.04 Ohio Hamilton County NONROAD 20.57 17.45 Ohio Hamilton County ONROAD 56.51 29.47 Ohio Hamilton County EGU 15.23 0.28 Ohio Hamilton County POINT 6.72 2.66 Ohio Warren County AREA 1.15 8.40 Ohio Warren County NONROAD 6.10 4.79 Ohio Warren County ONROAD 15.15 7.97 Ohio Warren County EGU 0.00 0.00 Ohio Warren County POINT 2.68 0.53

### C-6 2008 Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area All Anthropogenic Sources (Tons per Day) State County Sector NOX VOC
Indiana Dearborn County AREA 0.26 2.42 Indiana Dearborn County NONROAD 1.14 0.74 Indiana Dearborn County ONROAD 1.14 0.75 Indiana Dearborn County EGU 27.34 0.35 Indiana Dearborn County POINT 3.21 3.23 Kentucky Boone County AREA 5.02 8.41 Kentucky Boone County NONROAD 11.02 5.07 Kentucky Boone County ONROAD 8.53 4.00 Kentucky Boone County EGU 23.15 0.17 Kentucky Boone County POINT 0.12 2.64 Kentucky Campbell County AREA 1.32 4.34 Kentucky Campbell County NONROAD 5.34 1.51 Kentucky Campbell County ONROAD 4.88 2.29 Kentucky Campbell County EGU 0.00 0.00 Kentucky Campbell County POINT 0.02 0.28 Kentucky Kenton County AREA 4.06 7.88 Kentucky Kenton County NONROAD 7.33 1.95 Kentucky Kenton County ONROAD 8.37 3.85 Kentucky Kenton County EGU 0.00 0.00 Kentucky Kenton County POINT 0.03 1.17

Ohio Butler County AREA 2.18 10.31 Ohio Butler County NONROAD 8.89 5.68 Ohio Butler County ONROAD 16.05 7.87 Ohio Butler County EGU 1.34 0.02 Ohio Butler County POINT 10.53 2.77 Ohio Clermont County AREA 1.67 6.05 Ohio Clermont County NONROAD 4.22 3.68 Ohio Clermont County ONROAD 11.05 5.42 Ohio Clermont County EGU 44.65 0.20 Ohio Clermont County POINT 0.18 0.09 Ohio Clinton County AREA 0.43 2.85 Ohio Clinton County NONROAD 2.01 1.65 Ohio Clinton County ONROAD 3.87 2.33 Ohio Clinton County EGU 0.00 0.00 Ohio Clinton County POINT 0.00 0.00 Ohio Hamilton County AREA 5.27 28.80 Ohio Hamilton County NONROAD 17.21 14.66 Ohio Hamilton County ONROAD 46.80 22.70 Ohio Hamilton County EGU 27.26 0.20 Ohio Hamilton County POINT 6.17 2.85 Ohio Warren County AREA 1.17 7.30 Ohio Warren County NONROAD 5.19 4.10 Ohio Warren County ONROAD 12.76 6.26 Ohio Warren County EGU 0.00 0.00 Ohio Warren County POINT 3.14 0.82

# APPENDIX D

Nitrogen Oxides (NO x 

# ) Emissions from Electric Generating Units, Lawrenceburg Township,Dearborn County, Indiana and Entire CincinnatiHamilton OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area

### This page left intentionally blank.

### D-1 Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana NO x 

### Emissions from EGUs

Year Total NO x 

### Emissions, tons / year 1999 33,807.1 2000 32,657.1 2001 25,774.7 2002 17,533.8 2003 13,416.7 2004 12,552.8 2005 7,961.3 2006 8,041.6 2007 8,739.2 2008 7,429.2

NO x 

### Emissions from Lawrenceburg Townsh ip, Dearborn County, Indiana Electric Generating Unit American El ectric Power-Tanners Creek Generating Station, 1999- 2008

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,0001999200020012002200320042005200620072008

YearTons per Year

NOx

### D-2 Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana NOx Emissions

Facility Year NO x Emissions, tons / year American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 1999 33,807.1 American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 2000 32,657.1 American Electric Power (AEP) - Tanners Creek Generating Station 2001 25,774.7 American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 2002 17,533.8 American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 2003 13,416.7 American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 2004 12,552.8 American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 2005 7,961.3 American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 2006 8,041.6 American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 2007 8,739.2 American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 2008 7,429.2

### D-3 NO x 

### Emissions from EGUs-Ent ire Cincinnnati-Hamilton OHKY-IN Nonattainment Area

Year Total NO x 

### Emissions, tons / year 1999 115,477.8 2000 107,227.9 2001 90,347.2 2002 80,808.6 2003 73,084.4 2004 65,491.6 2005 55,492.4 2006 52,004.5 2007 50,979.6 2008 48,464.0

NO x 

### Emissions from Entire Nonattainment Area Electric Generating Units, 1999-2008

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,0001999200020012002200320042005200620072008



### YearTons per Year



### NOx

### D-4 Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment Area NOx Emissions from EGUs 1999

State Facility NO x Emissions, tons / year

Indiana American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 33,807.1 Kentucky East Bend 10,113.8

Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 26,429.1

Ohio William H Zimmer Generating Station 22,792.3

Ohio Walter C Beckjord Generating Station 22,091.4

Ohio Woodsdale 244.1 Total 115,477.8

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment Area NOx Emissions from EGUs 2000

State Facility NO x Emissions, tons / year

Indiana American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 32,657.1 Kentucky East Bend 8,671.0

Ohio Madison Generating Station 15.1 Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 25,518.8

Ohio William H Zimmer Generating Station 18,682.3

Ohio Walter C Beckjord Generating Station 21,408.7

Ohio Woodsdale 274.9 Total 107,227.9

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment Area NOx Emissions from EGUs 2001

State Facility NO x Emissions, tons / year

Indiana American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 25,774.7 Kentucky East Bend 8,161.5

Ohio Madison Generating Station 32.0 Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 18,598.8

Ohio William H Zimmer Generating Station 20,886.3

Ohio Walter C Beckjord Generating Station 16,743.0

Ohio Woodsdale 150.9 Total 90,347.2

### D-5 Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment Area NOx Emissions from EGUs 2002

State Facility NO x Emissions, tons / year

Indiana American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 17,533.8 Kentucky East Bend 5,454.9

Ohio Madison Generating Station 48.7 Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 17,941.5

Ohio William H Zimmer Generating Station 20,965.6

Ohio Walter C Beckjord Generating Station 18,736.8

Ohio Woodsdale 127.3 Total 80,808.6

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment Area NOx Emissions from EGUs 2003

State Facility NO x Emissions, tons / year

Indiana American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 13,416.7 Kentucky East Bend 7,056.0

Ohio Madison Generating Station 51.7 Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 15,593.7

Ohio William H Zimmer Generating Station 20,174.0

Ohio Walter C Beckjord Generating Station 16,727.9

Ohio Woodsdale 64.4 Total 73,084.4

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment Area NOx Emissions from EGUs 2004

State Facility NO x Emissions, tons / year

Indiana American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 12,552.8 Kentucky East Bend 6,187.2

Ohio Madison Generating Station 14.0 Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 17,102.2

Ohio William H Zimmer Generating Station 14,692.7

Ohio Walter C Beckjord Generating Station 14.914.2

Ohio Woodsdale 28.5 Total 65,491.6

### D-6 Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment Area NOx Emissions from EGUs 2005

State Facility NO x Emissions, tons / year

Indiana American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 7,961.3 Kentucky East Bend 3,952.2

Ohio Madison Generating Station 91.5 Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 15,264.6

Ohio William H Zimmer Generating Station 15,153.0

Ohio Walter C Beckjord Generating Station 13,012.8

Ohio Woodsdale 57.0 Total 55,492.4

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment Area NOx Emissions from EGUs 2006

State Facility NO x Emissions, tons / year

Indiana American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 8,041.6 Kentucky East Bend 5,399.7

Ohio Madison Generating Station 38.4 Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 12,797.9

Ohio William H Zimmer Generating Station 13,851.3

Ohio Walter C Beckjord Generating Station 11,830.2

Ohio Woodsdale 45.4 Total 52,004.5

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment Area NOx Emissions from EGUs 2007

State Facility NO x Emissions, tons / year

Indiana American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 8,739.2 Kentucky East Bend 5,563.0

Ohio Madison Generating Station 44.3 Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 9,754.6

Ohio William H Zimmer Generating Station 13,736.6

Ohio Walter C Beckjord Generating Station 13,031.8

Ohio Woodsdale 110.1 Total 50,979.6

### D-7 Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment Area NOx Emissions from EGUs 2008

State Facility NO x Emissions, tons / year

Indiana American Electric Power (AEP)- Tanners Creek Generating Station 7,429.2 Kentucky East Bend 4,492.4

Ohio Madison Generating Station 16.1 Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 12,371.7

Ohio William H Zimmer Generating Station 16,531.1

Ohio Walter C Beckjord Generating Station 7,549.0

Ohio Woodsdale 74.5 Total 48,464.0

# APPENDIX E

2008 Base Year Emissions Inventory and 2015 and 2020 Projected Emissions Inventory for Nitrogen Oxides (NO x 

# ) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) All Emission Sources for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana and Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area

### This page left intentionally blank.

### E-1 Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana All Anthropogenic Source Emission Totals (Tons per Day) Year NOx VOC

2008 33.09 7.49
2015 32.07 6.86
2020 32.56 6.96

2008 Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana All Anthropogenic Sources (Tons per Day)

AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL
NOX 0.26 1.14 1.14 30.55 33.09 VOC 2.42 0.74 0.75 3.58 7.49

2015 Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana All Anthropogenic Sources (Tons per Day)

AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL
NOX 0.27 0.78 0.60 30.42 32.07 VOC 1.79 0.62 0.50 3.95 6.86

2020 Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana All Anthropogenic Sources (Tons per Day)

AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL
NOX 0.27 0.65 0.42 31.22 32.56 VOC 1.79 0.60 0.42 4.15 6.96

### E-2 Comparison of 2008 Emission s and 2015 and 2020 Projected NO x 

### Emissions for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County

31.40 31.60 31.80 32.00 32.20 32.40 32.60 32.80 33.00 33.20

2008 2015 2020 

### YearTons Per Summer Day

NOX



### Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County

6.50 6.60 6.70 6.80 6.90 7.00 7.10 7.20 7.30 7.40 7.50 7.60

2008 2015 2020 YearTons Per Summer Day

VOC

### E-3 Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area All Anthropogenic Source Emission Totals (Tons per Day) Year NOx VOC

2008 344.32 187.66
2015 313.96 161.30
2020 297.25 137.14

2008 Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area All Anthropogenic Sources (Tons per Day)

AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL
NOX 21.38 62.35 113.45 147.14 344.32 VOC 78.36 39.04 55.47 14.79 187.66

2015 Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area All Anthropogenic Sources (Tons per Day)

AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL
NOX 21.38 45.73 54.01 192.84 313.96 VOC 74.69 33.65 35.35 17.61 161.30

2020 Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area All Anthropogenic Sources (Tons per Day)

AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL
NOX 21.38 39.27 38.17 198.43 297.25 VOC 54.52 32.09 32.13 18.59 137.14

### E-4 Comparison of 2008 Emission s and 2015 and 2020 Projected NO x 

### Emissions for the Entire Nonattainment Area

270.00 280.00 290.00 300.00 310.00 320.00 330.00 340.00 350.00

2008 2015 2020 YearTons Per Summer Day

NOX



### Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 a nd 2020 Projected VOC Emissions for the Entire Nonattainment Area

- 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 160.00 180.00 200.00

2008 2015 2020 YearTons Per Summer Day

VOC

### E-5 Comparison of 2008 Emission s and 2015 and 2020 Projected NO x 

### Emissions for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County Indiana, and Kentucky and Ohio

- 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00

2008 2015 2020 YearTons Per Summer Day

Lawrenceburg Township, IN Kentucky Ohio



### Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions for

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County Indiana, and Kentucky and Ohio

- 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 160.00

2008 2015 2020 YearTons Per Summer Day

Lawrenceburg Township, IN Kentucky Ohio

### E-6 2008 Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area All Anthropogenic Sources (Tons per Day) State County Sector NOX VOC
Indiana Dearborn County AREA 0.26 2.42 Indiana Dearborn County NONROAD 1.14 0.74 Indiana Dearborn County ONROAD 1.14 0.75 Indiana Dearborn County EGU 27.34 0.35 Indiana Dearborn County POINT 3.21 3.23 Kentucky Boone County AREA 5.02 8.41 Kentucky Boone County NONROAD 11.02 5.07 Kentucky Boone County ONROAD 8.53 4.00 Kentucky Boone County EGU 23.15 0.17 Kentucky Boone County POINT 0.12 2.64 Kentucky Campbell County AREA 1.32 4.34 Kentucky Campbell County NONROAD 5.34 1.51 Kentucky Campbell County ONROAD 4.88 2.29 Kentucky Campbell County EGU 0.00 0.00 Kentucky Campbell County POINT 0.02 0.28 Kentucky Kenton County AREA 4.06 7.88 Kentucky Kenton County NONROAD 7.33 1.95 Kentucky Kenton County ONROAD 8.37 3.85 Kentucky Kenton County EGU 0.00 0.00 Kentucky Kenton County POINT 0.03 1.17

Ohio Butler County AREA 2.18 10.31 Ohio Butler County NONROAD 8.89 5.68 Ohio Butler County ONROAD 16.05 7.87 Ohio Butler County EGU 1.34 0.02 Ohio Butler County POINT 10.53 2.77 Ohio Clermont County AREA 1.67 6.05 Ohio Clermont County NONROAD 4.22 3.68 Ohio Clermont County ONROAD 11.05 5.42 Ohio Clermont County EGU 44.65 0.20 Ohio Clermont County POINT 0.18 0.09 Ohio Clinton County AREA 0.43 2.85 Ohio Clinton County NONROAD 2.01 1.65 Ohio Clinton County ONROAD 3.87 2.33 Ohio Clinton County EGU 0.00 0.00 Ohio Clinton County POINT 0.00 0.00 Ohio Hamilton County AREA 5.27 28.80 Ohio Hamilton County NONROAD 17.21 14.66 Ohio Hamilton County ONROAD 46.80 22.70 Ohio Hamilton County EGU 27.26 0.20 Ohio Hamilton County POINT 6.17 2.85 Ohio Warren County AREA 1.17 7.30 Ohio Warren County NONROAD 5.19 4.10 Ohio Warren County ONROAD 12.76 6.26 Ohio Warren County EGU 0.00 0.00 Ohio Warren County POINT 3.14 0.82

### E-7 2015 Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area All Anthropogenic Sources (Tons per Day) State County Sector NOX VOC
Indiana Dearborn County AREA 0.27 1.79 Indiana Dearborn County NONROAD 0.78 0.62 Indiana Dearborn County ONROAD 0.60 0.50 Indiana Dearborn County EGU 25.30 0.44 Indiana Dearborn County POINT 5.12 3.51 Kentucky Boone County AREA 5.03 8.50 Kentucky Boone County NONROAD 9.77 4.55 Kentucky Boone County ONROAD 4.63 3.17 Kentucky Boone County EGU 24.97 0.18 Kentucky Boone County POINT 0.11 2.86 Kentucky Campbell County AREA 1.30 4.20 Kentucky Campbell County NONROAD 4.57 1.29 Kentucky Campbell County ONROAD 2.54 1.74 Kentucky Campbell County EGU 0.00 0.00 Kentucky Campbell County POINT 0.02 0.30 Kentucky Kenton County AREA 4.02 7.66 Kentucky Kenton County NONROAD 6.15 1.76 Kentucky Kenton County ONROAD 4.23 2.85 Kentucky Kenton County EGU 0.00 0.00 Kentucky Kenton County POINT 0.03 1.31

Ohio Butler County AREA 2.19 9.76 Ohio Butler County NONROAD 5.91 4.95 Ohio Butler County ONROAD 7.55 4.87 Ohio Butler County EGU 2.86 0.02 Ohio Butler County POINT 11.98 4.25 Ohio Clermont County AREA 1.67 5.74 Ohio Clermont County NONROAD 2.76 3.13 Ohio Clermont County ONROAD 5.10 3.29 Ohio Clermont County EGU 83.88 0.63 Ohio Clermont County POINT 0.16 0.26 Ohio Clinton County AREA 0.43 2.72 Ohio Clinton County NONROAD 1.39 1.26 Ohio Clinton County ONROAD 2.02 1.47 Ohio Clinton County EGU 0.00 0.00 Ohio Clinton County POINT 0.00 0.00 Ohio Hamilton County AREA 5.30 27.38 Ohio Hamilton County NONROAD 11.18 12.70 Ohio Hamilton County ONROAD 21.11 13.44 Ohio Hamilton County EGU 28.32 0.31 Ohio Hamilton County POINT 7.39 2.97 Ohio Warren County AREA 1.17 6.94 Ohio Warren County NONROAD 3.22 3.39 Ohio Warren County ONROAD 6.23 4.02 Ohio Warren County EGU 0.00 0.00 Ohio Warren County POINT 2.70 0.57

### E-8 2020 Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area All Anthropogenic Sources (Tons per Day) State County Sector NOX VOC
Indiana Dearborn County AREA 0.27 1.79 Indiana Dearborn County NONROAD 0.65 0.60 Indiana Dearborn County ONROAD 0.42 0.42 Indiana Dearborn County EGU 26.03 0.46 Indiana Dearborn County POINT 5.19 3.69 Kentucky Boone County AREA 5.03 8.50 Kentucky Boone County NONROAD 9.48 4.36 Kentucky Boone County ONROAD 3.45 2.96 Kentucky Boone County EGU 26.35 0.19 Kentucky Boone County POINT 0.12 3.01 Kentucky Campbell County AREA 1.30 4.20 Kentucky Campbell County NONROAD 4.34 1.22 Kentucky Campbell County ONROAD 1.81 1.55 Kentucky Campbell County EGU 0.00 0.00 Kentucky Campbell County POINT 0.03 0.31 Kentucky Kenton County AREA 4.02 7.66 Kentucky Kenton County NONROAD 5.75 1.73 Kentucky Kenton County ONROAD 3.01 2.56 Kentucky Kenton County EGU 0.00 0.00 Kentucky Kenton County POINT 0.03 1.42

Ohio Butler County AREA 2.19 9.76 Ohio Butler County NONROAD 4.64 4.80 Ohio Butler County ONROAD 5.37 4.50 Ohio Butler County EGU 2.95 0.02 Ohio Butler County POINT 11.91 4.56 Ohio Clermont County AREA 1.67 5.74 Ohio Clermont County NONROAD 2.17 2.96 Ohio Clermont County ONROAD 3.63 3.04 Ohio Clermont County EGU 86.27 0.66 Ohio Clermont County POINT 0.16 0.27 Ohio Clinton County AREA 0.43 2.72 Ohio Clinton County NONROAD 1.13 1.08 Ohio Clinton County ONROAD 1.41 1.22 Ohio Clinton County EGU 0.00 0.00 Ohio Clinton County POINT 0.00 0.00 Ohio Hamilton County AREA 5.30 27.38 Ohio Hamilton County NONROAD 8.73 12.19 Ohio Hamilton County ONROAD 14.44 12.00 Ohio Hamilton County EGU 29.13 0.31 Ohio Hamilton County POINT 7.56 3.12 Ohio Warren County AREA 1.17 6.94 Ohio Warren County NONROAD 2.38 3.15 Ohio Warren County ONROAD 4.63 3.88 Ohio Warren County EGU 0.00 0.00 Ohio Warren County POINT 2.70 0.57

# APPENDIX F

Mobile Source Input/Output Calculation Files

### F - 1 This page left intentionally blank.

## MOBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS INVENTORY FOR THE CINCINNATI OZONE NONATTAINMENT AREA Includes a portion of Dearborn County Indiana, the counties of Boone, Campbell, Kenton in Kentucky, and the counties of Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton, and Warren in Ohio. Emission Estimates for the Year 2005, 2008, 2015 and 2020 developed in support of the Ozone SIP



## OCTOBER 2009 Revised

Prepared for the Indiana Department of Environmenta l Management, the Kentucky Division for Air Quality and the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency by

OKI Regional Council of Governments

## Acknowledgments

Title Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for Cincinnati O zone Nonattainment Area

Abstract This report documents the methodology and results f rom the development of the mobile source emission inventory for ozone precursors in the Cincinnati ozone nonattainm ent area. The nonattainment area includes a portion of Dearbo rn County Indiana, Boone, Campbell and Kenton counties in Ken tucky, and Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton and Warren counties in Ohio. The ozone precursors include volatile org anic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NO x 

### ). The new 2005, 2008, 2015, and 2020 inventory, as provided i n this report, includes the benefits of low RVP fuel in Bu tler, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren counties. It is expe cted that the 2008 inventory, plus an additional safety margi n, will be established as the revised 8-hour ozone motor vehic le emissions budgets for the Cincinnati nonattainment area.

Date October 2009

Agency Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governme nts Mark Policinski, Executive Director

Project Manager Robert Koehler, P.E., Deputy Director

Project Staff

Andrew J. Reser, AICP, Principal Author Harikishan Perugu

The preparation of this document was financed coope ratively by the Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Transit Administration, the Commonwealth of Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, the Ohio Department of Tran sportation, and the units of local and county government in the OKI region. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this document are those of the OKI Regional Coun cil of Governments and are not necessarily those of the U.S. Department of Transpo rtation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation

.

### Table of Contents

Page

1. Introduction ..................................

................................................... ................................ 1 Figure 1-Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area .....

................................................... ......2 2. Mobile Source Emission Forecast Process ........

................................................... ............3 3. Mobile Source Emission Inventory ...............

................................................... ................7 Table 1-Mobile Source Emissions Inventory by State/ County for the Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area...........................

................................................... .................7 Table 1-Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the I ndiana and Ohio Portions of the Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area ...........

................................................... .........8 Table 2-Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the K entucky Portion of the Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area ...............

................................................... ...........8

Appendix A – MOBILE6.2 Input/Output Files for the I ndiana Portion of the Nonattainment Area Appendix B – MOBILE6.2 Input/Output Files for the K entucky Portion of the Nonattainment Area Appendix C – MOBILE6.2 Input/Output Files for the O hio Portion of the Nonattainment Area Appendix D – Air Quality Impact Summary for the OKI Portion of the Nonattainment Area and Emissions by State/County Appendix E – Clinton County Air Quality AnalysisMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 1

1. INTRODUCTION

At the request of the Indiana Department of Environ mental Management, the Kentucky Division for Air Quality, and the Ohio Environmenta l Protection Agency, the OhioKentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments (O KI) has prepared this mobile source emissions inventory of ozone precursor pollu tants. Pursuant to provisions of the CAAA of 1990, U.S. EPA designated a nine county are a in the Cincinnati area as a basic nonattainment area for ozone under the eight-hour o zone standard in April 2004. The Cincinnati ozone nonattainment area includes Lawren ceburg Township in Dearborn County Indiana, the Kentucky counties of Boone, Cam pbell and Kenton, and the Ohio counties of Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton and Warren (Figure 1). Ozone is formed through chemical reactions induced when sunlight re acts with volatile organic compounds (VOCs; principally hydrocarbons) and nitr ogen oxides (NO X 

### ). VOCs and NO X 

### occur from incomplete combustion of fossil fuels. Transportation-related sources are a major contributor of these pollutants. Since heat speeds the reactions, ozone levels are typically highest during hot summer days.

The OKI Regional Council of Governments, as the Met ropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), consists of Dearborn, Boone, Campbell, Kento n, Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren counties

. The cities of Franklin and Carlisle in Warren Count y are part of the Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission (MVRPC) p lanning area. Emissions for this portion of Warren County have been included in the inventory. Clinton County is outside of the OKI region, but is part of the ozone nonattainment area. The Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) is the lead pla nning agency for Clinton County. The Clinton County emissions analysis has been prep ared by ODOT and has been included in this emissions inventory.

OKI, as the MPO, is responsible for transportation planning and air quality/transportation conformity. Transportation conformity is a mechanis m to ensure that federal funding and approval are given to those transportation activiti es that are consistent with the air quality goals of the State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio. The SIPs include an inventory of projected emissions fr om vehicles. The projected inventory is also known as the emissions budget. This budget establishes a maximum allowable limit on future emissions from vehicles (mobile sou rces). OKI’s transportation plans and programs must be shown to be in conformity with all SIP provisions. The conformity process is a quantitative analysis, using U.S.EPA’s vehicle emissions software (currently MOBILE), demonstrating that forecasted regional veh icle emissions do not exceed the established budget.

This report documents the process for developing th e mobile emissions inventory for the Cincinnati ozone nonattainment area. Section 2 de tails the process and procedures used and Section 3 describes the transportation network. Section 4 provides the mobile emissions inventory.HighlandHighlandHighlandHighlandBrkenacBrkenBrackenBrackenPendletonPendletonPendletonPendletonCarrollCarrollCarrollCarrollGallatinGallatinGallatinGallatinSwitzerlandSwitzerlandSwitzerlandSwitzerlandOhioOhioOhioOhioBooneBooneBooneBooneKentonKentonKentonKentonCampbellCampbellCampbellCampbellHamiltonHamiltonHamiltonHamiltonFayetteFayetteFayetteFayetteGreeneGreeneGreeneGreeneFayetteFayetteFayetteFayetteCincinnatiCincinnatiCincinnatiCincinnatiCincinnatiCincinnatiCincinnatiCincinnatiCincinnatiGreenfieldManchesterBethelWashingtonCourtHouseConnersvilleDearbornDearbornDearbornDearbornFranklinFranklinFranklinFranklinRipleyRipleyRipleyRipleyUnoniUnonUnoniUnonGrantGrantGrantGrantAdamsAdasmAdamsAdasBrownBrownBrownBrownButlerButlerButlerButlerClermontClermontClermontClermontClintonClintonClintonClintonWarrenWarrenWarrenWarrenOxfordWilmingtonHamiltonBlanchesterHillsboroGeorgetownRipleyCincinnati-Hamilton,OH-KY-IN8-hourOzoneNonattainmentAreaDearbornCo(part)LawrenceburgTownshipBooneCoCampbellCoKentonCoButlerCoClermontCoClintonCoHamiltonCoWarrenCoBoundariesandlocationsareforillustrativepurposesonly.Thisisnotaregulatorydocument.Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 3

2. MOBILE SOURCE EMISSION FORECAST PROCESS

OKI Travel Demand Model Transportation system performance was estimated usi ng the OKI Travel Demand Model Version 7.6. The OKI Travel Demand Model is compos ed of TRANPLAN programs, CUBE Voyager programs and a series of FORTRAN progr ams written by OKI. It is a state of the practice model that uses the standard 4 phase sequential modeling approach of trip generation, distribution, modal choice and ass ignment. The model uses demographic and land use data and capacity and free-flow speed characteristics for each roadway segment in the network to produce a “loaded” highwa y network with forecasted traffic volumes with revised speeds based on specified spee d/capacity relationships.

Travel analysis zones are the basic geographic unit for estimating travel in the OKI model. The OKI region is subdivided into 1608 traff ic analysis zones to permit detail as well as manageability. A variety of socioeconomic data items are used in the OKI transportation planning process. These data are use d primarily to forecast future travel patterns by serving as independent variables in OKI trip generation equations. The following categories of planning data are utilized:

• Population (household and group quarter)

• Households

• Household vehicles

• Employment (by employment category and zone of work )

• Labor force participation (by zone of residence)

• Area type

The principal data requirements of the OKI travel d emand forecasting model are population and employment. From these variables, ot her characteristics including households, labor force, and personal vehicles may be derived. OKI utilizes both base year (2005) and future year data (2010, 2020 and 20 30) in the planning process. Other years are interpolated as needed. Planning data ar e maintained at the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) level, and originate in the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Base year 2005 and future year data for each variable ar e developed through various methods. More detailed explanation of base year and future y ear data generation for each of the above-mentioned categories of planning data follows . All of the variables represent the latest OKI planning assumptions.

Population Base and Future Year Data: Population data for bas e year 2005 and future years 2010, 2020 and 2030 originate with the 2000 Census of Pop ulation and Housing. Utilizing ArcView GIS, population data at the zonal level for 2000 was derived from the area proportion allocation of block level population.

As a tri-state regional planning agency, OKI uses c ounty level projections as prepared by the respective state data centers (Ohio Department of Development Office of Strategic Research, Kentucky State Data Center and Indiana Bu siness Research Center) as controlMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 4

totals. The most current projections (years 2005 t o 2030) were released by the Ohio and Indiana state data centers in 2003 and the Kentucky State Data Center in 2004. Population projections at the zonal level are calcu lated by multiplying household size by the projected zonal households. Household size is f actored so that, in each county, the sum of the zonal populations equals the control tot al.

Households Base Year Data: Household data for base year 2005 originates with the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Utilizing the geographic in formation system ArcMap, household data at the zonal level for 2000 was deri ved from the area proportion allocation of block level households. Year 2000 hou sehold data was updated to 2005 with residential building permits issued between January 2000 and December 2004. The residential building locations were geocoded in Arc Map, then aggregated to the TAZs. The housing unit totals for each TAZ were converted to households by applying a vacancy rate, an adjustment for permitted but unbui lt units, and subtracting demolitions (where data was available). These households were t hen added to the year Census 2000 zonal household total to arrive at 2005 households for each TAZ.

Future Year Data: The preparation of household proj ections was accomplished by calculating the number of households for a projecte d county population using ratios of householders to total population by age specific co horts derived from the 2000 Census for each analysis year. Disaggregation to TAZs was determined by historical trends, existing and future land use, topography, flood pla in information, availability of land, local knowledge and other factors.

Household Vehicles Base and Future Year Data: Base and future year ho usehold vehicle data were obtained from the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. The 2000 Census is the only source of household vehicle data available at the block group level. Average vehicles per household were calculated for block groups then app lied to the TAZs associated with each block group. The 2005, 2010, 2020 and 2030 veh icles per household level was held at the 2000 level based on the fact that, since 200 2, the number of vehicles per household has exceeded the number of drivers per household.

Labor Force Base and Future Year Data: The OKI labor force is a function of the population as determined by a labor force participation ratio (th e number of employed persons in the labor force per persons 16 and over). Household dat a for base year 2005 originates with the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Utilizin g the geographic information system ArcMap, household data at the zonal level for 2000 was derived from the area proportion allocation of block group level employed labor forc e. The labor force projections for 2005, 2010, 2020 and 2030 were based on the most re cent projections of national labor force participation rates by age and sex cohorts fr om the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for each of those years. These rates were then applied to the projected county age/sex cohorts and adjusted to el iminate the unemployed to arrive at a county employed labor force control total. Employe d labor force at the zonal level isMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 5

calculated by multiplying the labor force participa tion rate by the zonal population. The labor force participation rate is adjusted so that, in each county, the sum of the zonal labor force counts equals the control total.

Employment Base Year Data: Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW or ES202) data for 2005 was utilized as the primary tool to calcul ate employment at the zonal level. Individual business records containing physical loc ation, number of employees and SIC code were geocoded through ArcMap and aggregated to the TAZ level. This data set was supplemented by other sources of data to complete t he commuting employment picture in the OKI region. Each zone’s employment was divided according to the SIC code into three classes (retail, office, industrial) based up on the potential for generating trips.

Future Year Data: For future year employment proje ction, calculation was first made of the employment at the regional level. At the region al level, employment is a calculation of the region’s employed labor force minus workers who live in the region but commute out to work, plus workers who live outside the regi on but commute in to work. The regional total was disaggregated first to the count y level based on historic trends and expected changes in the county’s share of the regio n’s employment and then to the TAZ level. Disaggregation to TAZs was determined by his torical trends, existing and future land use, topography, flood plain information, avai lability of land, local knowledge and other factors.

Area Type Base and Future Year Data: For each analysis year, each TAZ is assigned an area type designation as CBD, Urban, Suburban or Rural based on population and employment densities.

Model Calibration OKI’s Travel Demand Model has been validated to obs erved traffic volumes for the model base year 2005. The modeling network encompa sses the entire ozone nonattainment area with the exception of Clinton Co unty, Ohio. The modeling network also includes Greene, Miami and Montgomery counties in Ohio and the remainder of Dearborn County Indiana. The difference between e stimated vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and 2005 observed VMT is less than 1%. A hig hway screenline analysis compares the screenline observed and simulated traf fic volume discrepancies with the ODOT standard of maximum desirable deviation. The comparison shows that the model performs at a satisfactory level and all the errors were under the ODOT curve. Further information can be found in OKI’s 2007 report, “ OKI/MVRPC Travel Demand Model Methodology/ Validation Report ”. For the calibration, OKI used over 3000 traffic counts collected through 2006 by the Ohio Department of Tr ansportation (ODOT), the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, many county and local gover nments, transportation engineering consultants, and OKI. These traffic counts cover n early 50% percent of the links in the OKI portion of the modeling network. The methodolo gy provides consistency with past emission inventory and conformity analysis work per formed by OKI.Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 6

Local Inputs and Post-Model Processing OKI incorporates a variety of sources of local data to both improve and confirm the accuracy of VMT, as well as other travel-related pa rameters. Free flow speeds used on the highway and transit networks are based on trave l time studies performed locally. The OKI post-processing program, IMPACT, uses the loade d highway network to generate VMT by hour, VMT by speed distribution and VMT by f acility type. These tables are then included as input into MOBILE6.2. Two separat e sets of VMT tables are generated: one for the four Ohio counties plus Dearborn County Indiana, and a second for the three Kentucky counties. The VMT by hour tables utilize hourly traffic distribution and directional split factors for different roadway typ es as developed by OKI. The main source of the data was the permanent traffic counti ng stations located throughout the OKI region for the years of 1998-2002. This data was s upplemented with data collected at coverage count stations (locations with counts take n on only one-two days). The stations were classified by area type: urban and rural, and functional classification: freeway, arterial and collector. Speeds representing various “loaded” conditions (with traffic volumes) are estimated using techniques from the 19 97 Highway Capacity Manual. This permits the estimation of speeds as conditions vary from hour to hour on the different facility types throughout the region. The IMPACT p rogram performs the appropriate summation by area and roadway type as well as regio nal totals. OKI has also developed seasonal conversion factors to adjust traffic volum es to summer conditions. The factors were derived from local data collected at permanent traffic counting stations during 1994- 1997 utilizing the average daily traffic monthly co nversion factors for June, July and August. Further information on OKI’s IMPACT progra m is documented in the report, “Travel Demand Model Summary Reporting and Impact S ummary Reporting: OKI/MVRPC Travel Demand Model User’s Guide”, OKI 20 03.

Emission Factor Model OKI’s conformity assessment utilized U.S.EPA’s emis sions model MOBILE6.2 to develop emission factors for VOC’s, NO X 

### and PM2.5. The MOBILE6.2 input file contains local parameters, developed through consul tation with ODOT and OEPA, for temperature, fuel programs and fuel characteristics . The local parameters are combined with the VMT tables from the OKI Travel Demand Mode l to produce one set of emission factors measured in grams per mile for the appropri ate calendar year (from 1952 to 2050). These emission factors are then multiplied by VMT. The methodologies incorporated into MOBILE6.2 for estimating emission s are based on methods and research conducted by U.S.EPA. OKI’s development o f MOBILE6.2 input values were guided by the U.S.EPA’s document “Technical Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6 for Emission Inventory Preparation”, January 2002 . MOBILE6.2 inputs and outputs are included in the appendices.Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 7

3. MOBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS INVENTORY

Table 1. Mobile Source Emissions by State/County fo r the Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area (tons per day)
State 2005 2008 2015 2020 Dearborn NonAttainment Portion VOC 

### 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.42
NOx 

### 1.44 1.14 0.60 0.42 Kentucky
Boone VOC 

### 4.33 4.00 3.17 2.96
CO 

### 47.20 44.46 37.41 38.21
NOx 

### 10.27 8.53 4.63 3.45 Campbell
VOC 

### 2.52 2.29 1.74 1.55
CO 

### 27.50 25.52 20.39 19.97
NOx 

### 5.98 4.88 2.54 1.81
Kenton VOC 

### 4.32 3.85 2.8 5 2.5 6
CO 

### 47.19 42.76 33.68 32.97
NOx 

### 10.39 8.37 4.23 3.01
OKI KY Total VOC 

### 11.17 10.14 7 .7 6 7.0 7
CO 

### 121.89 112.74 91.48 91.14
NOx 

### 26.64 21.78 11.40 8.27
Ohio
Butler VOC 

### 9.94 7.87 4.87 4.50
NOx 

### 18.88 16.05 7.55 5.37
Clermont VOC 

### 6.86 5.42 3.29 3.04
NOx 

### 13.04 11.05 5.10 3.63
Hamilton VOC 

### 29.47 22.70 13.44 12.00
NOx 

### 56.51 46.80 21.11 14.44
Warren VOC 

### 7.97 6.26 4.02 3.88
NOx 

### 15.15 12.76 6.23 4.63
OKI OH Total

VOC 

### 54.24 42.25 25.62 23.42
NOx 

### 103. 58 86.66 39.99 28.0 7Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 8

Table 1 Cont. Clinton, OH VOC 

### 3.02 2.33 1.47 1.22
NOx 

### 5.07 3.87 2.02 1.41
OH VOC Total 

### 57.26 44.58 27.09 24.64
OH NOx Total 

### 108.65 90.53 42.01 29.48
NonAttainment Area Total VOC 

### 69.43 55.47 35.3 5 32.1 3
NOx 

### 136.73 113.45 54.01 38.17



### The mobile source VOC and NO x 

### emissions inventory for all counties in the nonattainment area is provided in Table 1. Table 2 shows the mobile source inventory for the combined Indiana and Ohio portions of the C incinnati ozone nonattainment area. Table 3 is the mobile source emissions inventory fo r the Kentucky portion of the nonattainment area. At the discretion of the India na Department of Environmental Management, the Kentucky Division for Air Quality a nd the Ohio EPA, an additional safety margin may be added to the 2008 inventory fo r the purpose of establishing a motor vehicle emission budget (MVEB). The addition of th is safety margin would not interfere with the SIPs purpose. In the absence of an additi onal safety margin, the 2008 inventory, as presented below, will serve as the (MVEB) for tr ansportation conformity.

Table 2 Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Indiana a nd Ohio Portions of the Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area (tons per day)
2005 2008 MVEB 2015 2020 VOC 58.26 45.33 27.59 25.06 NOx 110.09 91.67 42.61 29.90

Table 3 Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Kentucky Portion of the Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area (tons per day)
2005 2008 MVEB 2015 2020 VOC 11.17 10.14 7.7 6 7.0 7 NOx 26.64 21.78 11.40 8.27Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 9 

# APPENDIX A

MOBILE6.2 Input/Output Files for Indiana Portion of

Nonattainment AreaMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 10

VMT By Hour (INHVMT.D), all analysis years

VMT BY HOUR 0.0478 0.0719 0.0796 0.0666 0.0563 0.0532 0.0545 0.0543 0.0515 0.0523 0.0560 0.0565 0.0504 0.0377 0.0266 0.0209 0.0197 0.0171 0.0142 0.0156 0.0188 0.0224 0.0251 0.0310



### 2005 VMT by Speed Bin (INSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0115 0.0098 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9787 1 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 47 0.0053 0.0085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9814 1 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 44 0.0049 0.0079 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9828 1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0093 0.0079 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9829 1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0090 0.0077 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9833 1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0096 0.0082 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9822 1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0093 0.0079 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9827 1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0090 0.0076 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9834 1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0086 0.0073 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9841 1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0083 0.0070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9847 1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0080 0.0068 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9852 1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0067 0.0057 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9876 1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0066 0.0056 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9878 1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0079 0.0067 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9853 1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0080 0.0068 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9852 1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0076 0.0065 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9859 1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0085 0.0073 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9842 1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0075 0.0063 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9862 1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0088 0.0075 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9837 1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0098 0.0083 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9819 1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0094 0.0080 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9827 1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0098 0.0083 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9818 1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0100 0.0085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9815 1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0104 0.0089 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9807 2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1622 0.0097 0.1308 0.04 17 0.0908 0.5647 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1713 0.0099 0.1305 0.04 52 0.0877 0.5553 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1783 0.0101 0.1313 0.04 53 0.0886 0.5464 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2060 0.0103 0.1221 0.03 79 0.0894 0.5343 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2128 0.0104 0.1212 0.03 75 0.0893 0.5288 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2008 0.0101 0.1206 0.03 75 0.0880 0.5430 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2200 0.0104 0.1172 0.03 60 0.0876 0.5288 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2243 0.0106 0.1184 0.03 63 0.0886 0.5217 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2208 0.0106 0.1200 0.03 69 0.0892 0.5226 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2360 0.0108 0.1176 0.03 58 0.0891 0.5108 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2240 0.0107 0.1216 0.03 74 0.0904 0.5159 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2072 0.0105 0.1266 0.03 94 0.0918 0.5244 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2062 0.0108 0.1324 0.04 14 0.0950 0.5141 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1941 0.0107 0.1370 0.04 33 0.0967 0.5182 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2127 0.0109 0.1325 0.04 14 0.0956 0.5069 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2142 0.0109 0.1304 0.04 06 0.0945 0.5094 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2076 0.0106 0.1272 0.03 96 0.0922 0.5228 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2327 0.0110 0.1233 0.03 78 0.0920 0.5032 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2009 0.0097 0.1118 0.03 45 0.0832 0.5600 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1925 0.0096 0.1137 0.03 53 0.0836 0.5652 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2259 0.0108 0.1228 0.03 78 0.0913 0.5114 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1941 0.0104 0.1305 0.04 10 0.0931 0.5308 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1926 0.0105 0.1339 0.04 22 0.0949 0.5258 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1856 0.0103 0.1314 0.04 15 0.0929 0.5383 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000



### 2005 VMT by Facility (INFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 1 0.236 0.530 0.229 0.005 0.258 0.508 0.229 0.005 0.261 0.500 0.234 0.005 0.260 0.487 0.248 0.005 0.259 0.484 0.253 0.004 0.256 0.495 0.244 0.005 0.252 0.486 0.257 0.004 0.252 0.482 0.262 0.004 0.260 0.478 0.258 0.004 0.263 0.467 0.266 0.004Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 11

0.267 0.470 0.259 0.004 0.301 0.457 0.238 0.004 0.290 0.461 0.246 0.004 0.255 0.489 0.252 0.004 0.247 0.484 0.266 0.004 0.260 0.476 0.261 0.004 0.257 0.485 0.254 0.004 0.274 0.458 0.264 0.004 0.296 0.475 0.225 0.005 0.279 0.490 0.225 0.005 0.248 0.480 0.268 0.004 0.239 0.504 0.252 0.004 0.228 0.510 0.258 0.004 0.230 0.516 0.249 0.005

... Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel transit buses 

### 26 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004



### 2005 MOBILE6.2 Input File (INSCN.IN)
* Mobile6 file for Dearborn County, IN * created 6/7/06, ajr,pre 2006 ******************* Header Section ************** ********** MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :
POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO
PARTICULATES : * PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE REPORT FILE : in.rpt
DATABASE OUTPUT :
WITH FIELDNAMES : DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22
DAILY OUTPUT : EMISSIONS TABLE : inemiss.tb1

RUN DATAMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 12 ******************* Run Section ***************** **********
VMT BY HOUR : INHVMT.D
SPEED VMT : INSVMT.D
VMT BY FACILITY : INFVMT.D *REG DIST : INREG.D
EXPRESS HC AS VOC :
EXPAND BUS EFS : ******************* Summer Scenario Section ***** ***************** SCENARIO RECORD : Indiana Emissions - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2005 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 SEASON : 1 MIN/MAX TEMP : 61.0 95.0 ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY : 75.0 FUEL PROGRAM : 1 FUEL RVP : 9.0 PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 313.00 ******************* Annual Scenario Section ***** ***************** SCENARIO RECORD : Indiana Emissions - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2005 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 FUEL PROGRAM : 1 FUEL RVP : 9.0 PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 318.00 ******************* End of Run ****************** **********
END OF RUN



### 2005 MOBILE6.2 Output Report (IN.RPT)

*************************************************** ************************ * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: INSCN.IN (file 1, run 1). *

*************************************************** ************************

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the followin g external * data file: INHVMT.D

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external * data file: INSVMT.D

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external * data file: INFVMT.D

Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Indiana Emissions - CY20xx * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels.

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b

* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Basic Emissiion Rates * from the external data file PMNH3BER.D

* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Sulfur Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMNH3SDR.D

Calendar Year: 2005 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 61.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 95.0 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 92. ppmMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 13 Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.4158 0.3387 0.1165 0.0360 0.0006 0.0019 0.0849 0.0057 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 1.421 1.461 2.332 1.684 2.335 0.626 0.870 0.620 3.37 1.516 Composite CO : 12.72 15.11 20.39 16.46 22.20 1.741 1.521 3.691 20.98 14.019 Composite NOX : 0.948 1.148 1.483 1.234 4.207 1.485 1.544 12.551 1.20 2.183

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0009 0.0016

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 9.702 0.586 0.842 Composite CO : 137.29 4.535 3.219 Composite NOX : 8.274 15.786 13.826

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Indiana Emissions - CY20xx * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels.

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b

Calendar Year: 2005 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 9.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 92. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.4158 0.3387 0.1165 0.0360 0.0006 0.0019 0.0849 0.0057 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 1.148 1.297 2.093 1.501 1.786 0.626 0.870 0.620 2.22 1.292 Composite CO : 15.35 18.58 24.01 19.97 20.81 1.741 1.521 3.691 17.79 16.641 Composite NOX : 0.924 1.190 1.544 1.281 4.334 1.485 1.544 12.551 1.41 2.200

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0009 0.0016

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 7.662 0.586 0.842 Composite CO : 118.47 4.535 3.219 Composite NOX : 8.782 15.786 13.826

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- 

### 2008 VMT by Speed bin (INSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0132 0.0090 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9779 1 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 47 0.0068 0.0078 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9807 1 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 44 0.0063 0.0072 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9821 1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0106 0.0072 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9822 1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0103 0.0070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9827 1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0110 0.0075 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9815 1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0107 0.0073 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9820 1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0103 0.0070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9827 1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0098 0.0067 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9835 1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0095 0.0064 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9841 1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0092 0.0062 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9846 1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0077 0.0052 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9871 1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0076 0.0052 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9873 1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0091 0.0062 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9848 1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0092 0.0062 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9846Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 14 1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0087 0.0059 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9853 1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0098 0.0067 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9836 1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0086 0.0058 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9856 1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0101 0.0069 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9831 1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0112 0.0076 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9812 1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0107 0.0073 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9820 1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0112 0.0076 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9811 1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0115 0.0078 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9807 1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0119 0.0081 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9799 2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1745 0.0083 0.1008 0.04 69 0.0340 0.6355 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1844 0.0088 0.1002 0.05 07 0.0299 0.6260 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1909 0.0091 0.0999 0.05 06 0.0299 0.6195 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2202 0.0105 0.0909 0.04 27 0.0319 0.6037 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2268 0.0108 0.0896 0.04 21 0.0316 0.5991 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2140 0.0102 0.0896 0.04 21 0.0314 0.6126 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2339 0.0111 0.0858 0.04 04 0.0306 0.5981 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2380 0.0113 0.0864 0.04 07 0.0308 0.5928 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2343 0.0112 0.0878 0.04 14 0.0312 0.5941 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2505 0.0119 0.0852 0.04 03 0.0307 0.5813 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2374 0.0113 0.0890 0.04 19 0.0315 0.5889 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2191 0.0104 0.0936 0.04 39 0.0324 0.6006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2180 0.0104 0.0983 0.04 60 0.0336 0.5936 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2056 0.0098 0.1029 0.04 80 0.0347 0.5990 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2249 0.0107 0.0981 0.04 60 0.0337 0.5865 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2265 0.0108 0.0964 0.04 52 0.0332 0.5880 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2206 0.0105 0.0945 0.04 43 0.0327 0.5974 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2472 0.0118 0.0901 0.04 25 0.0320 0.5764 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2152 0.0103 0.0829 0.03 90 0.0297 0.6229 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2069 0.0099 0.0852 0.04 00 0.0303 0.6278 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2422 0.0115 0.0908 0.04 28 0.0322 0.5805 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2073 0.0099 0.0983 0.04 60 0.0337 0.6049 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2054 0.0098 0.1010 0.04 72 0.0343 0.6024 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1980 0.0094 0.0993 0.04 64 0.0338 0.6131 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000



### 2008 VMT by Facility Type (INFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 1 0.244 0.539 0.211 0.006 0.267 0.516 0.212 0.005 0.269 0.510 0.216 0.005 0.268 0.495 0.233 0.005 0.266 0.492 0.237 0.005 0.262 0.504 0.229 0.005 0.258 0.494 0.242 0.005 0.257 0.492 0.247 0.005 0.266 0.488 0.242 0.004 0.269 0.475 0.252 0.004 0.273 0.480 0.243 0.004 0.307 0.468 0.221 0.004 0.295 0.473 0.228 0.004 0.261 0.503 0.233 0.004 0.252 0.497 0.247 0.004 0.265 0.489 0.243 0.004 0.263 0.495 0.237 0.004 0.280 0.467 0.249 0.004 0.304 0.479 0.212 0.005 0.288 0.494 0.212 0.006 0.256 0.486 0.253 0.005 0.246 0.514 0.235 0.005 0.234 0.522 0.239 0.005 0.237 0.527 0.231 0.005

... Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel transit buses 

### 26 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 15

0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004



### 2008 MOBILE6.2 Input File (INSCN.IN) * Mobile6 file for Dearborn County, IN * created 4/9/07, ajr post em62in.06c ******************* Header Section ************** ********** MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :
POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO
PARTICULATES : * PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE REPORT FILE : in.rpt
DATABASE OUTPUT :
WITH FIELDNAMES : DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22
DAILY OUTPUT : EMISSIONS TABLE : inemiss.tb1

RUN DATA ******************* Run Section ***************** **********
VMT BY HOUR : INHVMT.D
SPEED VMT : INSVMT.D
VMT BY FACILITY : INFVMT.D
EXPAND BUS EFS : REBUILD EFFECTS : 0.10 ******************* Summer Scenario Section ***** ***************** SCENARIO RECORD : Indiana Emissions - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2008
EVALUATION MONTH : 7 SEASON : 1

M IN/MAX TEMP : 62.0 91.3 FUEL PROGRAM : 1 FUEL RVP : 9.0 PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSVMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 16

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 ******************* Annual Scenario Section ***** ***************** SCENARIO RECORD : Indiana Emissions - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2008
EVALUATION MONTH : 7 MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 FUEL PROGRAM : 1 FUEL RVP : 9.0 PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 43 ******************* End of Run ****************** ***** *****
END OF RUN



### 2008 MOBILE6.2 Output Report (IN.RPT)

*************************************************** ************************ * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: INSCN.IN (file 1, run 1). *

*************************************************** ************************

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the followin g external * data file: INHVMT.D

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external * data file: INSVMT.D

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external * data file: INFVMT.D

Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Indiana Emissions - CY20xx * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels.

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b
HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUIL D FRACTION IS 0.10.

* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Basic Emissiion Rates * from the external data file PMNH3BER.D

* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Sulfur Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMNH3SDR.D M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.

Calendar Year: 2008 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 62.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 91.3 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.6 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: NoMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 17 Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----

- VMT Distribution: 0.3728 0.3705 0.1273 0.0359 0.0004 0.0019 0.0857 0.0055 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- -----------------

- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 1.026 1.055 1.747 1.232 1.634 0.311 0.595 0.504 2.98 1.115 Composite CO : 9.67 11.41 15.71 12.51 15.69 1.215 1.028 2.758 19.79 10.745 Composite NOX : 0.686 0.860 1.238 0.957 2.909 0.776 1.065 9.881 1.23 1.692

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- -----------------

- Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0002 0.0009 0.0017

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 7.973 0.374 0.726 Composite CO : 104.18 3.451 2.765 Composite NOX : 7.683 13.272 11.989

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Indiana Emissions - CY20xx * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels.

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.

Calendar Year: 2008 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 9.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----

- VMT Distribution: 0.3728 0.3705 0.1273 0.0359 0.0004 0.0019 0.0857 0.0055 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- -----------------

- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.876 0.968 1.598 1.129 1.299 0.311 0.595 0.504 2.18 0.992 Composite CO : 12.16 14.76 19.91 16.08 15.68 1.215 1.028 2.758 17.64 13.440 Composite NOX : 0.675 0.901 1.302 1.003 3.017 0.776 1.065 9.881 1.42 1.716

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- -----------------

- Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 18 VMT Mix: 0.0002 0.0009 0.0017

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 6.524 0.374 0.726 Composite CO : 98.89 3.451 2.765 Composite NOX : 8.570 13.272 11.989

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- 

### 2015 VMT by Speed Bin (INSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0135 0.0089 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9777 1 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 96 0.0022 0.0077 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9805 1 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 89 0.0020 0.0072 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9820 1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 43 0.0066 0.0071 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9820 1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0105 0.0069 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9825 1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0112 0.0074 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9814 1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0109 0.0072 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9819 1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0105 0.0069 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9826 1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0101 0.0066 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9833 1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0097 0.0064 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9839 1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0094 0.0062 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9845 1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0078 0.0052 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9870 1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0077 0.0051 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9872 1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0093 0.0061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9846 1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0094 0.0062 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9844 1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0089 0.0059 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9852 1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0100 0.0066 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9834 1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0087 0.0058 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9855 1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0103 0.0068 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9829 1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0114 0.0075 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9810 1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0110 0.0072 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9818 1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0115 0.0076 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9809 1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0117 0.0077 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9805 1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0122 0.0080 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9797 2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1735 0.0086 0.0897 0.06 35 0.0801 0.5846 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1832 0.0087 0.0914 0.06 54 0.0766 0.5746 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1907 0.0089 0.0937 0.06 75 0.0905 0.5487 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2194 0.0090 0.0844 0.05 91 0.0774 0.5508 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2266 0.0091 0.0838 0.05 68 0.0790 0.5448 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2138 0.0088 0.0832 0.05 68 0.0778 0.5596 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2339 0.0090 0.0811 0.05 44 0.0775 0.5440 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2386 0.0091 0.0821 0.05 49 0.0784 0.5369 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2350 0.0092 0.0831 0.05 59 0.0789 0.5380 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2508 0.0093 0.0816 0.05 41 0.0789 0.5252 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2385 0.0093 0.0843 0.05 67 0.0800 0.5313 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2211 0.0092 0.0875 0.05 99 0.0812 0.5411 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2206 0.0095 0.0915 0.06 31 0.0841 0.5313 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2080 0.0095 0.0946 0.06 60 0.0855 0.5364 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2275 0.0096 0.0917 0.06 30 0.0846 0.5237 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2289 0.0095 0.0903 0.06 18 0.0837 0.5259 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2216 0.0092 0.0879 0.06 02 0.0816 0.5395 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2479 0.0095 0.0856 0.05 73 0.0816 0.5181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2131 0.0084 0.0771 0.05 20 0.0734 0.5759 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2044 0.0084 0.0783 0.05 34 0.0738 0.5818 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2406 0.0094 0.0851 0.05 72 0.0809 0.5268 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2075 0.0092 0.0900 0.06 24 0.0823 0.5486 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2062 0.0093 0.0924 0.06 43 0.0839 0.5439 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1984 0.0090 0.0905 0.06 32 0.0821 0.5568 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000



### 2015 VMT by Facility Type (INFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 1 0.248 0.545 0.201 0.006 0.270 0.522 0.202 0.005 0.274 0.514 0.208 0.005 0.272 0.499 0.225 0.005 0.271 0.495 0.230 0.005 0.267 0.507 0.221 0.005 0.263 0.496 0.236 0.005 0.262 0.493 0.240 0.005 0.271 0.489 0.236 0.005 0.274 0.477 0.245 0.004 0.278 0.480 0.237 0.004 0.314 0.467 0.215 0.004Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 19

0.303 0.472 0.221 0.004 0.268 0.503 0.226 0.004 0.258 0.497 0.241 0.004 0.272 0.488 0.236 0.004 0.269 0.497 0.230 0.005 0.285 0.468 0.242 0.004 0.307 0.483 0.204 0.005 0.290 0.500 0.204 0.006 0.259 0.491 0.245 0.005 0.251 0.518 0.227 0.005 0.239 0.525 0.231 0.005 0.242 0.530 0.223 0.005

... Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel transit buses 

### 26 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004



### 2015 MOBILE6.2 Input File (INSCN.IN) * Mobile6 file for Dearborn County, IN * created 4/9/07, ajr post em62in.06c ******************* Header Section ************** ********** MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :
POLLU TANTS : HC NOx CO
PARTICULATES : * PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE REPORT FILE : in.rpt
DATABASE OUTPUT :
WITH FIELDNAMES : DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22
DAILY OUTPUT : EMISSIONS TABLE : inemiss.tb1Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 20

RUN DATA ******************* Run Section ***************** ******** **
VMT BY HOUR : INHVMT.D
SPEED VMT : INSVMT.D
VMT BY FACILITY : INF VMT.D
EXPAND BUS EFS : REBUILD EFFECTS : 0.10 ******************* Summer Scenario Section ***** ***************** SCENARIO RECORD : Indiana Emissions - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2015 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 SEASON : 1 MIN/MAX TEMP : 62.0 91.3 FUEL PROGRAM : 1 FUEL RVP : 9.0 PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 43 ******************* Annual Scenario Section ***** ***************** SCENARIO RECORD : Indiana Emissions - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2015 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 FUEL PROGRAM : 1 FUEL RVP : 9.0 PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 43 ******************* End of Run ****************** **********
END OF RUN



### 2015 MOBILE6.2 Output File (IN.RPT)

*************************************************** ************************ * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: INSCN.IN (file 1, run 1). *

*************************************************** ************************

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the followin g external * data file: INHVMT.D

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external * data file: INSVMT.D

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external * data file: INFVMT.D

Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Indiana Emissions - CY20xx * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels.

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSVMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 21 * Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12
HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUIL D FRACTION IS 0.10.

* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Basic Emissiion Rates * from the external data file PMNH3BER.D

* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Sulfur Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMNH3SDR.D M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.

Calendar Year: 2015 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 62.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 91.3 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.6 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----

- VMT Distribution: 0.3031 0.4218 0.1449 0.0360 0.0003 0.0021 0.0866 0.0053 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- -----------------

- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.544 0.634 1.127 0.760 0.858 0.106 0.324 0.337 2.97 0.672 Composite CO : 7.05 8.04 10.87 8.76 9.92 0.799 0.641 0.941 19.78 7.645 Composite NOX : 0.369 0.475 0.835 0.567 1.086 0.173 0.474 3.747 1.23 0.804

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- -----------------

- Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 2.719 0.269 0.513 Composite CO : 18.47 1.573 1.485 Composite NOX : 3.970 6.114 7.085

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Indiana Emissions - CY20xx * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels.

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 22 Calendar Year: 2015 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 9.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----

- VMT Distribution: 0.3031 0.4218 0.1449 0.0360 0.0003 0.0021 0.0866 0.0053 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- -----------------

- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.480 0.594 1.045 0.709 0.680 0.106 0.324 0.337 2.17 0.613 Composite CO : 9.61 10.58 13.92 11.44 10.16 0.799 0.641 0.941 17.63 9.935 Composite NOX : 0.358 0.494 0.873 0.591 1.114 0.173 0.474 3.747 1.43 0.817

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- -----------------

- Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 2.104 0.269 0.513 Composite CO : 18.91 1.573 1.485 Composite NOX : 4.073 6.114 7.085

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- 

### 2020 VMT by Speed Bin (INSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 53 0.0082 0.0086 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9779 1 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0046 0.00 50 0.0021 0.0075 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9807 1 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0043 0.00 46 0.0020 0.0070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9822 1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 43 0.0066 0.0069 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9822 1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0105 0.0068 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9827 1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0112 0.0072 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9816 1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0109 0.0070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9821 1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0105 0.0067 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9827 1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0101 0.0064 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9835 1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0097 0.0062 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9841 1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0094 0.0060 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9846 1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0078 0.0050 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9872 1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0077 0.0050 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9873 1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0093 0.0059 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9848 1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0094 0.0060 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9846 1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0089 0.0057 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9854 1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0100 0.0064 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9836 1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0087 0.0056 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9857 1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0103 0.0066 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9831 1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0114 0.0073 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9812 1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0109 0.0070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9820 1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0115 0.0074 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9812 1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0117 0.0075 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9808 1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0122 0.0078 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9800 2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1833 0.0076 0.0842 0.06 79 0.0777 0.5793 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1934 0.0095 0.0864 0.06 88 0.0965 0.5455 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2013 0.0096 0.0869 0.07 24 0.1084 0.5214 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2313 0.0078 0.0790 0.06 89 0.0870 0.5259 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2388 0.0079 0.0785 0.06 05 0.0763 0.5380 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2255 0.0077 0.0780 0.06 06 0.0752 0.5531 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2465 0.0078 0.0760 0.05 80 0.0748 0.5370 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2514 0.0079 0.0768 0.05 85 0.0833 0.5220 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2476 0.0080 0.0778 0.05 95 0.0762 0.5310 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2641 0.0081 0.0764 0.05 76 0.0760 0.5179 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2513 0.0081 0.0789 0.06 04 0.0772 0.5242 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2332 0.0081 0.0820 0.06 39 0.0824 0.5305 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2327 0.0083 0.0858 0.06 73 0.0813 0.5246 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2195 0.0083 0.0887 0.07 05 0.0828 0.5301 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2399 0.0084 0.0859 0.06 71 0.0818 0.5169 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2413 0.0083 0.0846 0.06 59 0.0809 0.5190 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 23 2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2336 0.0081 0.0823 0.06 42 0.0788 0.5329 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2610 0.0083 0.0801 0.06 11 0.0786 0.5110 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2247 0.0073 0.0722 0.05 55 0.0709 0.5693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2155 0.0073 0.0734 0.05 69 0.0713 0.5755 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2533 0.0081 0.0796 0.06 09 0.0779 0.5200 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2189 0.0080 0.0844 0.06 66 0.0796 0.5425 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2175 0.0082 0.0866 0.06 86 0.0812 0.5378 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2094 0.0080 0.0849 0.06 74 0.0795 0.5508 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000



### 2020 VMT by Facility Type (INFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 1 0.251 0.541 0.202 0.006 0.273 0.518 0.204 0.005 0.277 0.509 0.209 0.005 0.274 0.493 0.227 0.005 0.273 0.489 0.233 0.005 0.270 0.502 0.224 0.005 0.266 0.490 0.239 0.005 0.265 0.487 0.244 0.005 0.274 0.483 0.239 0.005 0.276 0.471 0.249 0.004 0.281 0.475 0.240 0.004 0.317 0.461 0.218 0.004 0.306 0.467 0.224 0.004 0.270 0.498 0.227 0.004 0.261 0.491 0.243 0.004 0.274 0.482 0.239 0.004 0.271 0.492 0.233 0.005 0.288 0.462 0.245 0.004 0.310 0.478 0.207 0.005 0.293 0.495 0.206 0.006 0.261 0.485 0.248 0.005 0.253 0.513 0.229 0.005 0.242 0.521 0.233 0.005 0.244 0.526 0.225 0.005

... Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel transit buses 

### 26 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 24

0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004



### 2020 MOBILE6.2 Input File (INSCN.IN) * Mobile6 file for Dearborn County, IN * created 4/9/07, ajr post em62in.06c ******************* Header Section ************** ********** MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :
POLLU TANTS : HC NOx CO
PARTICULATES : * PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE REPORT FILE : in.rpt
DATABASE OUTPUT :
WITH FIELDNAMES : DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22
DAILY OUTPUT : EMISSIONS TABLE : inemiss.tb1

RUN DATA ******************* Run Section ***************** ******** **
VMT BY HOUR : INHVMT.D
SPEED VMT : INSVMT.D
VMT BY FACILITY : INF VMT.D EXPAND BUS EFS : REBUILD EFFECTS : 0.10 ******************* Summer Scenario Section ***** ***************** SCENARIO RECORD : Indiana Emissions - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2020 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 SEASON : 1 MIN/MAX TEMP : 62.0 91.3 FUEL PROGRAM : 1 FUEL RVP : 9.0 PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 43 ******************* Annual Scenario Section ***** ***************** SCENARIO RECORD : Indiana Emissions - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2020 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 FUEL PROGRAM : 1 FUEL RVP : 9.0 PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 43 ******************* End of Run ****************** **********
END OF RUNMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 25

2020 MOBILE6.2 Output File (IN.RPT)

*************************************************** ************************ * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: INSCN.IN (file 1, run 1). *

*************************************************** ************************

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the followin g external * data file: INHVMT.D

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external * data file: INSVMT.D

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external * data file: INFVMT.D

Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Indiana Emissions - CY20xx * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels.

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12
HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUIL D FRACTION IS 0.10.

* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Basic Emissiion Rates * from the external data file PMNH3BER.D

* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Sulfur Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMNH3SDR.D M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.

Calendar Year: 2020 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 62.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 91.3 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.6 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.2788 0.4388 0.1507 0.0365 0.0003 0.0022 0.0876 0.0051 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.420 0.513 0.824 0.593 0.611 0.069 0.224 0.300 2.97 0.531 Composite CO : 6.40 7.27 9.44 7.82 9.61 0.709 0.514 0.551 19.90 6.896 Composite NOX : 0.269 0.372 0.656 0.445 0.583 0.071 0.296 1.931 1.23 0.534

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 1.573 0.256 0.434 Composite CO : 17.72 0.734 1.006 Composite NOX : 2.132 2.704 4.692

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Indiana Emissions - CY20xx * File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels.

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSVMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 26 * Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.

Calendar Year: 2020 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 9.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: No

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.2788 0.4388 0.1507 0.0365 0.0003 0.0022 0.0876 0.0051 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.375 0.489 0.788 0.566 0.488 0.069 0.224 0.300 2.18 0.494 Composite CO : 8.95 9.49 11.97 10.13 9.83 0.709 0.514 0.551 17.73 8.966 Composite NOX : 0.257 0.383 0.681 0.459 0.599 0.071 0.296 1.931 1.43 0.541

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 1.258 0.256 0.434 Composite CO : 18.14 0.734 1.006 Composite NOX : 2.187 2.704 4.692

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 27 

# APPENDIX B

MOBILE6.2 Input/Output Files for Kentucky Portion o f

Nonattainment AreaMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 28

VMT By Hour (KYHVMT.D), all analysis years

VMT BY HOUR 0.0478 0.0719 0.0796 0.0666 0.0563 0.0532 0.0545 0.0543 0.0515 0.0523 0.0560 0.0565 0.0504 0.0377 0.0266 0.0209 0.0197 0.0171 0.0142 0.0156 0.0188 0.0224 0.0251 0.0310



### 2005 VMT by Speed Bin (KYSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0052 0.0000 0.00 11 0.0222 0.0279 0.0462 0.0454 0.0566 0.1746 0.6208 1 2 0.0006 0.0040 0.0017 0.0039 0.0000 0.0010 0.00 55 0.0151 0.0228 0.0433 0.0401 0.0807 0.1605 0.6206 1 3 0.0048 0.0000 0.0015 0.0039 0.0006 0.0027 0.00 78 0.0146 0.0224 0.0811 0.0687 0.1074 0.0805 0.6041 1 4 0.0054 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0019 0.01 01 0.0176 0.0249 0.0493 0.0371 0.0832 0.1618 0.6081 1 5 0.0058 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.01 07 0.0152 0.0282 0.0469 0.0484 0.0585 0.1751 0.6105 1 6 0.0060 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.00 71 0.0196 0.0291 0.0461 0.0510 0.0589 0.1744 0.6070 1 7 0.0064 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0008 0.0000 0.01 22 0.0174 0.0295 0.0515 0.0479 0.0597 0.1736 0.6009 1 8 0.0064 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0008 0.0000 0.01 22 0.0173 0.0294 0.0535 0.0447 0.0600 0.1749 0.6010 1 9 0.0060 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.00 95 0.0172 0.0290 0.0450 0.0500 0.0594 0.1764 0.6067 1 10 0.0059 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.00 92 0.0167 0.0282 0.0443 0.0487 0.0593 0.1778 0.6092 1 11 0.0057 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0000 0.01 08 0.0153 0.0261 0.0482 0.0424 0.0615 0.1858 0.6036 1 12 0.0054 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0000 0.01 02 0.0145 0.0246 0.0496 0.0400 0.0602 0.1852 0.6095 1 13 0.0000 0.0052 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 47 0.0188 0.0249 0.0397 0.0478 0.0578 0.1796 0.6214 1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0053 0.00 06 0.0229 0.0263 0.0379 0.0502 0.0584 0.1803 0.6180 1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0247 0.0333 0.0364 0.0525 0.0594 0.1812 0.6127 1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0237 0.0319 0.0361 0.0503 0.0591 0.1826 0.6163 1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0214 0.0289 0.0346 0.0459 0.0587 0.1870 0.6234 1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0190 0.0255 0.0331 0.0405 0.0584 0.1918 0.6318 1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0195 0.0261 0.0357 0.0421 0.0575 0.1875 0.6315 1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0205 0.0276 0.0375 0.0448 0.0573 0.1839 0.6285 1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0214 0.0288 0.0379 0.0465 0.0575 0.1824 0.6256 1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0242 0.0326 0.0393 0.0525 0.0580 0.1775 0.6159 1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0254 0.0342 0.0391 0.0549 0.0585 0.1764 0.6114 1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0323 0.0295 0.0398 0.0571 0.0586 0.1744 0.6083 2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1120 0.1106 0.1128 0.24 11 0.1801 0.2150 0.0283 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1200 0.1265 0.1351 0.21 75 0.1662 0.2073 0.0275 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 3 0.0000 0.0023 0.0021 0.1299 0.1238 0.1504 0.20 73 0.1546 0.2008 0.0289 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0026 0.1266 0.1284 0.1293 0.20 77 0.1753 0.2002 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0024 0.1170 0.1230 0.1168 0.22 00 0.1815 0.2085 0.0307 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1136 0.1149 0.1132 0.22 27 0.1869 0.2170 0.0316 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0025 0.1155 0.1226 0.1149 0.21 60 0.1874 0.2090 0.0319 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0028 0.1204 0.1198 0.1134 0.21 63 0.1907 0.2046 0.0320 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1167 0.1183 0.1101 0.22 30 0.1888 0.2113 0.0318 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1221 0.1252 0.1118 0.21 82 0.1850 0.2064 0.0313 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0028 0.1163 0.1256 0.1145 0.21 68 0.1858 0.2067 0.0316 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0029 0.1098 0.1164 0.1141 0.22 11 0.1909 0.2125 0.0323 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1129 0.1080 0.1087 0.23 37 0.1894 0.2161 0.0312 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1106 0.1085 0.1006 0.24 26 0.1932 0.2143 0.0302 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1139 0.1111 0.0913 0.24 55 0.1952 0.2124 0.0306 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1129 0.1100 0.0892 0.24 49 0.1977 0.2141 0.0311 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1144 0.1115 0.0906 0.24 47 0.1945 0.2136 0.0306 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1228 0.1189 0.0878 0.24 44 0.1900 0.2061 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1120 0.1087 0.0836 0.24 18 0.2008 0.2211 0.0320 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1140 0.1109 0.0881 0.24 25 0.1947 0.2188 0.0310 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1328 0.1288 0.0955 0.24 55 0.1736 0.1963 0.0275 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1174 0.1148 0.0985 0.24 62 0.1846 0.2096 0.0290 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1165 0.1142 0.1001 0.24 68 0.1843 0.2093 0.0289 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1123 0.1101 0.1004 0.24 37 0.1893 0.2145 0.0297 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000



### 2005 VMT by Facility (KYFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 1 0.467 0.332 0.154 0.047 0.490 0.313 0.154 0.044 0.498 0.313 0.144 0.045 0.474 0.328 0.149 0.048 0.458 0.342 0.150 0.051 0.455 0.349 0.144 0.052 0.441 0.357 0.148 0.054 0.443 0.356 0.147 0.054 0.457 0.346 0.144 0.052 0.461 0.340 0.148 0.051Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 29

0.474 0.334 0.141 0.050 0.497 0.325 0.129 0.049 0.497 0.321 0.134 0.047 0.482 0.328 0.142 0.048 0.471 0.335 0.145 0.049 0.486 0.327 0.139 0.048 0.510 0.309 0.135 0.046 0.539 0.286 0.133 0.042 0.547 0.290 0.119 0.044 0.525 0.301 0.129 0.045 0.482 0.310 0.164 0.043 0.462 0.334 0.156 0.048 0.448 0.343 0.160 0.049 0.444 0.350 0.155 0.051

... Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel transit buses 

### 26 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014



### 2005 MOBILE6.2 Input File (KYSCN.IN) * Mobile6 file for Boone, Campbell and Kenton count ies * pre 2006 analys is years, includes annual scenario * created 10/12/05,AJR

************************ Header Section *********** ****** MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :
POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO
PARTICULATES : * PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE
REPORT FILE : KY.RPT
DATABASE OUTPUT :Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 30

WITH FIELDNAMES : DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111
DAILY OUTPUT : EMISSIONS TABLE : kyemis s.tb1
RUN DATA ************************ Run Section ************** ***** > post 1999, KY counties of Boone, Campbell and Ken ton *REG DIST : KYREG.D
VMT BY HOUR : KYHVMT.D
SPEED VMT : KYSVMT.D
VMT BY FACILITY : KYFVMT.D
EXPRESS HC AS VOC : I/M PROGRAM : 1 1999 2005 2 T/O IDLE I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1968 2005 I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 22211111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 1 20.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 99.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 18.0 10.0 I/M PROGRAM : 2 1999 2005 2 T/O FP & GC I/M MODEL Y EARS : 2 1981 2005 I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 2 20.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 99.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 18.0 10.0
ANTI-TAMP PROGR : 99 75 50 22222 22211111 1 12 099. 22222222
STAGE II REFUELING : 99 2 86. 86.
EXPAND BUS EFS : ********************* Summer Scenario Section ***** ***********
SCENARIO RECORD : KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2005 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

F UEL RVP : 7.8 FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 MIN/MAX TEMP : 66.0 89.0 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 323 ********************* Annual Scenario Section ***** ************
SCENARIO RECORD : KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2005 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 FUEL RVP : 9.0 FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 324 *********************************** END OF RUN   ** *** ********
END OF RUNMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 31

2005 MOBILE6.2 Output Report (KY.RPT)

*************************************************** ************************ * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: KYSCN.IN (file 2, run 1). *

*************************************************** ************************ * post 1999, KY counties of Boone, Campbell and Ken ton

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the followin g external * data file: KYHVMT.D

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external * data file: KYSVMT.D

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external * data file: KYFVMT.D

Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors M601 Comment: User has enabled STAGE II REFUELING.

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels.

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV *** I/M credits for Tech1&2 vehicles were read from the following external data file: TECH12.D M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b

Calendar Year: 2005 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 66.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 89.0 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Fuel Sulfur Content: 90. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: Yes

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----

- VMT Distribution: 0.4158 0.3387 0.1165 0.0360 0.0006 0.0019 0.0849 0.0057 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- -----------------

- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.871 0.901 1.428 1.035 1.244 0.575 0.796 0.536 2.19 0.938 Composite CO : 10.18 11.84 15.33 12.73 14.37 1.611 1.408 3.205 15.87 10.912 Composite NOX : 0.920 1.099 1.415 1.180 4.396 1.537 1.599 13.396 1.31 2.226

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- -----------------

- Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0009 0.0016

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 6.036 0.578 0.727 Composite CO : 98.01 4.483 2.790 Composite NOX : 8.754 16.461 14.355

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 2.Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 32 * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels.

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b

Calendar Year: 2005 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Fuel Sulfur Content: 90. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: Yes

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----

- VMT Distribution: 0.4158 0.3387 0.1165 0.0360 0.0006 0.0019 0.0849 0.0057 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- -----------------

- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.864 0.941 1.520 1.089 1.154 0.575 0.796 0.536 2.08 0.956 Composite CO : 13.44 16.12 19.94 17.10 14.60 1.611 1.408 3.205 14.58 14.257 Composite NOX : 0.931 1.166 1.506 1.253 4.517 1.537 1.599 13.396 1.52 2.269

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- -----------------

- Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0009 0.0016

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 5.574 0.578 0.727 Composite CO : 90.66 4.483 2.790 Composite NOX : 9.196 16.461 14.355

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- 

### 2008 VMT by Speed bin (KYSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0014 0.00 34 0.0213 0.0225 0.0599 0.0156 0.0469 0.0285 0.8004 1 2 0.0000 0.0010 0.0033 0.0003 0.0004 0.0027 0.00 40 0.0175 0.0153 0.0639 0.0092 0.0770 0.0609 0.7445 1 3 0.0000 0.0036 0.0005 0.0011 0.0020 0.0033 0.00 57 0.0347 0.0215 0.0679 0.0706 0.0701 0.0428 0.6760 1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0014 0.0018 0.0055 0.00 78 0.0148 0.0197 0.0670 0.0053 0.0765 0.0620 0.7384 1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0037 0.00 64 0.0192 0.0222 0.0702 0.0066 0.0462 0.0288 0.7960 1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0035 0.00 60 0.0208 0.0231 0.0677 0.0099 0.0460 0.0288 0.7936 1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0012 0.0038 0.00 85 0.0180 0.0244 0.0727 0.0063 0.0456 0.0288 0.7900 1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0011 0.0038 0.00 89 0.0175 0.0243 0.0720 0.0063 0.0455 0.0290 0.7910 1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0038 0.00 57 0.0199 0.0202 0.0729 0.0068 0.0458 0.0291 0.7951 1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0037 0.00 53 0.0197 0.0196 0.0719 0.0066 0.0458 0.0293 0.7974 1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0010 0.0035 0.00 71 0.0166 0.0213 0.0687 0.0055 0.0519 0.0526 0.7711 1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0010 0.0034 0.00 67 0.0158 0.0194 0.0695 0.0052 0.0766 0.0465 0.7553 1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0020 0.00 44 0.0190 0.0181 0.0648 0.0108 0.0465 0.0491 0.7853 1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0015 0.00 06 0.0232 0.0190 0.0575 0.0188 0.0462 0.0295 0.8037 1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0015 0.00 00 0.0249 0.0201 0.0570 0.0195 0.0457 0.0298 0.8016 1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0015 0.00 00 0.0240 0.0192 0.0564 0.0186 0.0458 0.0299 0.8045 1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0015 0.00 00 0.0221 0.0173 0.0546 0.0171 0.0459 0.0305 0.8110 1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0015 0.00 00 0.0200 0.0152 0.0527 0.0149 0.0460 0.0311 0.8186 1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0015 0.00 00 0.0204 0.0156 0.0545 0.0159 0.0464 0.0304 0.8153 1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0015 0.00 00 0.0213 0.0165 0.0560 0.0172 0.0465 0.0298 0.8111 1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0015 0.00 00 0.0220 0.0172 0.0567 0.0177 0.0465 0.0297 0.8087 1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0014 0.00 00 0.0244 0.0197 0.0586 0.0201 0.0463 0.0291 0.8003Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 33 1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0014 0.00 00 0.0255 0.0207 0.0590 0.0210 0.0461 0.0290 0.7973 1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0014 0.00 00 0.0263 0.0215 0.0598 0.0219 0.0461 0.0287 0.7942 2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1888 0.0882 0.0726 0.20 34 0.1932 0.2201 0.0338 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1976 0.1003 0.0869 0.19 39 0.1737 0.2146 0.0330 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 3 0.0000 0.0001 0.0007 0.2011 0.1046 0.0965 0.19 06 0.1654 0.2085 0.0325 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 4 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002 0.2043 0.1007 0.0869 0.19 03 0.1806 0.2031 0.0338 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.1975 0.0969 0.0737 0.19 08 0.1986 0.2084 0.0341 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.1896 0.0890 0.0733 0.19 34 0.2034 0.2162 0.0350 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 7 0.0000 0.0001 0.0001 0.1949 0.0958 0.0755 0.19 19 0.1997 0.2074 0.0349 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 8 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002 0.1948 0.0963 0.0766 0.19 16 0.1989 0.2067 0.0347 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.1943 0.0916 0.0719 0.19 20 0.2034 0.2121 0.0346 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.2017 0.0989 0.0691 0.18 92 0.2000 0.2070 0.0340 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 11 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.1963 0.0965 0.0760 0.19 40 0.1974 0.2055 0.0342 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 12 0.0000 0.0001 0.0003 0.1862 0.0881 0.0800 0.19 76 0.2013 0.2116 0.0348 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1893 0.0886 0.0691 0.20 03 0.2015 0.2174 0.0338 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1891 0.0883 0.0638 0.20 32 0.2055 0.2168 0.0333 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1940 0.0906 0.0600 0.20 08 0.2076 0.2137 0.0333 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1927 0.0900 0.0588 0.20 01 0.2097 0.2151 0.0337 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1942 0.0907 0.0593 0.20 01 0.2068 0.2151 0.0338 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2053 0.0958 0.0570 0.19 73 0.2042 0.2074 0.0330 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1904 0.0889 0.0549 0.19 73 0.2110 0.2218 0.0358 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1924 0.0898 0.0575 0.19 86 0.2058 0.2204 0.0354 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2170 0.1013 0.0608 0.19 82 0.1914 0.1994 0.0318 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1973 0.0921 0.0639 0.20 25 0.1985 0.2126 0.0331 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1963 0.0917 0.0650 0.20 34 0.1983 0.2125 0.0328 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1907 0.0890 0.0641 0.20 35 0.2017 0.2173 0.0337 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000



### 2008 VMT by Facility Type (KYFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 1 0.462 0.337 0.170 0.030 0.482 0.321 0.170 0.028 0.494 0.317 0.161 0.029 0.469 0.330 0.170 0.031 0.454 0.341 0.173 0.032 0.455 0.345 0.166 0.034 0.440 0.353 0.172 0.035 0.443 0.351 0.172 0.034 0.457 0.342 0.168 0.033 0.458 0.337 0.173 0.032 0.473 0.331 0.164 0.032 0.499 0.320 0.149 0.032 0.498 0.318 0.154 0.030 0.481 0.327 0.161 0.030 0.469 0.333 0.167 0.031 0.485 0.324 0.160 0.031 0.508 0.308 0.155 0.029 0.533 0.287 0.153 0.027 0.546 0.288 0.138 0.028 0.521 0.301 0.148 0.029 0.469 0.318 0.186 0.027 0.457 0.337 0.176 0.030 0.443 0.346 0.180 0.031 0.442 0.351 0.175 0.032

... Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel transit buses 

### 26 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 34

0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007



### 2008 MOBILE6.2 Input File (KYSCN.IN) * Mobile6 file for Boone, Campbell and Kenton count ies * post 2005 analysis years, includes annual scenari o * created 4/9/07,AJR, post 2005 ************************ Header Section *********** ****** MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :
POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO
PARTICULATES : * PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE
REPORT FILE : KY.RPT
DATABASE OUTPUT :
WITH FIELDNAMES : DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22
DAILY OUTPUT : EMISSIONS TABLE : kyemiss.tb1

RUN DATA ************************ Run Section ************** *****
VMT BY HOUR : KYHVMT.D
SPEED VMT : KYSVMT.D
VMT BY FACILITY : KYFVMT .D STAGE II REFUELING : 99 2 86. 86.
EXPAND BUS EFS : REBUILD EFFECTS : 0.30 ********************* Summer Scenario Section ***** *** ********
SCENARIO RECORD : KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2008 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 FUEL RVP : 7.8 FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 MIN/MAX TEMP : 61.0 95.0 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV
DIESEL SULFUR : 43Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 35

********************* Annual Scenario Section ***** ************ SCENARIO RECORD : KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2008 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 FUEL RVP : 9.0
FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 43 *********************************** END OF RUN   ** ***********
END OF RUN



### 2008 MOBILE6.2 Output Report (KY.RPT)

*************************************************** ************************ * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: KYSCN.IN (file 2, run 1). *

*************************************************** ************************

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the followin g external * data file: KYHVMT.D

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external * data file: KYSVMT.D

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external * data file: KYFVMT.D

Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors M601 Comment: User has enabled STAGE II REFUELING.

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels.

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b
HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUIL D FRACTION IS 0.30. M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.

Calendar Year: 2008 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 61.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 95.0 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: Yes

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3728 0.3705 0.1273 0.0359 0.0004 0.0019 0.0857 0.0055 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.765 0.795 1.288 0.921 1.044 0.291 0.556 0.456 2.32 0.834 Composite CO : 9.18 10.54 14.15 11.47 12.43 1.153 0.977 2.537 18.01 9.895 Composite NOX : 0.695 0.874 1.254 0.971 3.039 0.825 1.132 10.682 1.30 1.776

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0002 0.0009 0.0017

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 5.712 0.383 0.654 Composite CO : 87.14 3.588 2.539Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 36 Composite NOX : 7.927 14.073 12.793

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels.

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.

Calendar Year: 2008 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: Yes

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3728 0.3705 0.1273 0.0359 0.0004 0.0019 0.0857 0.0055 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.734 0.799 1.302 0.928 0.923 0.291 0.556 0.456 2.11 0.821 Composite CO : 11.88 14.19 18.70 15.34 12.85 1.153 0.977 2.537 15.32 12.832 Composite NOX : 0.687 0.914 1.318 1.017 3.135 0.825 1.132 10.682 1.53 1.801

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0002 0.0009 0.0017

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 4.970 0.383 0.654 Composite CO : 80.26 3.588 2.539 Composite NOX : 8.913 14.073 12.793

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- 

### 2015 VMT by Speed Bin (KYSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 1 1 0.0000 0.0005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 10 0.0181 0.0280 0.0690 0.0389 0.0448 0.1520 0.6475 1 2 0.0005 0.0000 0.0033 0.0000 0.0006 0.0005 0.00 68 0.0259 0.0336 0.0733 0.0566 0.0927 0.0599 0.6463 1 3 0.0005 0.0002 0.0083 0.0247 0.0007 0.0070 0.03 20 0.0356 0.0194 0.1146 0.0389 0.0565 0.0235 0.6380 1 4 0.0006 0.0000 0.0002 0.0007 0.0011 0.0014 0.01 59 0.0325 0.0247 0.0783 0.0606 0.0898 0.0605 0.6336 1 5 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0008 0.0007 0.00 81 0.0155 0.0232 0.0821 0.0384 0.0687 0.1246 0.6369 1 6 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0008 0.0004 0.00 89 0.0154 0.0247 0.0833 0.0347 0.0735 0.1242 0.6334 1 7 0.0007 0.0000 0.0000 0.0012 0.0000 0.0022 0.00 88 0.0166 0.0243 0.0877 0.0340 0.0735 0.1237 0.6272 1 8 0.0007 0.0000 0.0003 0.0009 0.0004 0.0024 0.00 82 0.0169 0.0239 0.0869 0.0335 0.0740 0.1246 0.6273 1 9 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0011 0.0002 0.00 87 0.0155 0.0246 0.0815 0.0346 0.0743 0.1257 0.6332 1 10 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0011 0.0007 0.00 79 0.0150 0.0239 0.0799 0.0385 0.0698 0.1267 0.6357 1 11 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 0.0000 0.0020 0.00 78 0.0147 0.0264 0.1042 0.0300 0.0906 0.0837 0.6390 1 12 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 0.0000 0.0018 0.00 74 0.0187 0.0438 0.0803 0.0565 0.0693 0.0857 0.6349 1 13 0.0005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.00 55 0.0138 0.0230 0.0681 0.0665 0.0507 0.1231 0.6480 1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 05 0.0187 0.0246 0.0656 0.0416 0.0463 0.1572 0.6448 1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 06 0.0202 0.0259 0.0654 0.0435 0.0468 0.1581 0.6395 1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0194 0.0254 0.0640 0.0417 0.0470 0.1594 0.6432 1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0176 0.0230 0.0599 0.0381 0.0475 0.1633 0.6507 1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0155 0.0204 0.0556 0.0336 0.0481 0.1675 0.6594 1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0159 0.0208 0.0587 0.0349 0.0471 0.1636 0.6589 1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0168 0.0220 0.0616 0.0371 0.0465 0.1604 0.6557 1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0175 0.0229 0.0631 0.0385 0.0463 0.1590 0.6527 1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0198 0.0259 0.0677 0.0434 0.0458 0.1547 0.6426 1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0208 0.0272 0.0689 0.0455 0.0458 0.1538 0.6380 1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.00 00 0.0216 0.0276 0.0706 0.0472 0.0455 0.1520 0.6348 2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3682 0.0762 0.0569 0.15 21 0.1330 0.1717 0.0418 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3865 0.0820 0.0769 0.13 11 0.1185 0.1651 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 3 0.0000 0.0001 0.0053 0.3753 0.0895 0.0806 0.13 77 0.1062 0.1641 0.0410 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0014 0.3846 0.0847 0.0696 0.13 81 0.1146 0.1659 0.0409 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.3783 0.0803 0.0611 0.14 00 0.1283 0.1703 0.0416 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3632 0.0759 0.0597 0.14 33 0.1355 0.1788 0.0436 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 37 2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3704 0.0796 0.0613 0.14 06 0.1300 0.1751 0.0430 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3721 0.0789 0.0610 0.14 28 0.1273 0.1752 0.0427 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3700 0.0774 0.0586 0.14 22 0.1345 0.1748 0.0425 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.3838 0.0804 0.0577 0.13 80 0.1302 0.1687 0.0411 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3743 0.0793 0.0635 0.13 93 0.1283 0.1733 0.0419 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3559 0.0752 0.0640 0.14 58 0.1339 0.1815 0.0437 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3625 0.0738 0.0556 0.14 63 0.1418 0.1781 0.0419 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3637 0.0745 0.0503 0.15 17 0.1426 0.1760 0.0411 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3709 0.0754 0.0458 0.15 10 0.1427 0.1736 0.0407 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3682 0.0747 0.0449 0.15 05 0.1448 0.1754 0.0413 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3720 0.0755 0.0455 0.15 03 0.1421 0.1733 0.0414 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3905 0.0786 0.0439 0.14 73 0.1360 0.1644 0.0392 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3655 0.0738 0.0424 0.14 80 0.1473 0.1783 0.0446 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3706 0.0751 0.0444 0.14 88 0.1424 0.1748 0.0439 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4133 0.0833 0.0469 0.14 70 0.1218 0.1514 0.0364 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3796 0.0775 0.0489 0.15 20 0.1343 0.1677 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3778 0.0774 0.0496 0.15 29 0.1344 0.1682 0.0397 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3678 0.0754 0.0490 0.15 32 0.1393 0.1738 0.0415 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000



### 2015 VMT by Facility Type (KYFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 1 0.376 0.309 0.285 0.030 0.395 0.292 0.286 0.028 0.404 0.295 0.272 0.029 0.379 0.304 0.286 0.030 0.364 0.316 0.288 0.032 0.365 0.325 0.277 0.033 0.350 0.329 0.287 0.034 0.352 0.329 0.286 0.034 0.365 0.321 0.281 0.033 0.365 0.313 0.290 0.032 0.380 0.312 0.276 0.032 0.406 0.309 0.253 0.032 0.405 0.304 0.260 0.031 0.390 0.309 0.271 0.031 0.377 0.312 0.279 0.031 0.393 0.307 0.270 0.031 0.415 0.293 0.263 0.029 0.438 0.271 0.264 0.027 0.453 0.279 0.239 0.029 0.430 0.287 0.254 0.029 0.378 0.283 0.313 0.027 0.368 0.309 0.293 0.030 0.355 0.316 0.299 0.031 0.354 0.324 0.290 0.032

... Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel transit buses 

### 26 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 38

0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009



### 2015 MOBILE6.2 Input File (KYSCN.IN) * Mobile6 file for Boone, Campbell and Kenton count ies * post 2005 analysis years, includes a nnual scenario * created 4/9/07,AJR, post 2005 ************************ Header Section *********** ******
MOB ILE6 INPUT FILE :
POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO
PARTICULATES : * PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE
REPORT FILE : KY.RPT
DATABASE OUTPUT :
WITH FIELDNAMES : DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22
DAILY OUTPUT : EMISSIONS TABLE : kyemiss.tb1

RUN DATA ************************ Run Section ************** *****
VMT BY HOUR : KYHVMT.D
SPEED VMT : K YSVMT.D
VMT BY FACILITY : KYFVMT.D
STAGE II REFUELING : 99 2 86. 86.
EXPAND BUS EFS : REBUILD EFFECTS : 0.30 ********************* Summer Scenario Section ***** ***********
SCENARIO RECORD : KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2015 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 FUEL RVP : 7.8 FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 MIN/MAX TEMP : 61.0 95.0 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 43 ********************* Annual Scenario Section ***** ************
SCENARIO RECORD : KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2015 EVALUATION MONTH : 7
FUEL RVP : 9.0 FUEL PROGRAM : 2 NMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 39

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 43 *********************************** END OF RUN   ** ***********
END OF RUN



### 2015 MOBILE6.2 Output File (KY.RPT)

*************************************************** ************************ * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: KYSCN.IN (file 2, run 1). *

*************************************************** ************************

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the followin g external * data file: KYHVMT.D

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external * data file: KYSVMT.D

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external * data file: KYFVMT.D

Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors M601 Comment: User has enabled STAGE II REFUELING.

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels.

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12
HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUIL D FRACTION IS 0.30. M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.

Calendar Year: 2015 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 61.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 95.0 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: Yes

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3031 0.4218 0.1449 0.0360 0.0003 0.0021 0.0866 0.0053 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.446 0.530 0.927 0.632 0.616 0.110 0.337 0.357 2.42 0.560 Composite CO : 6.52 7.37 9.89 8.01 9.07 0.838 0.671 1.014 18.78 7.031 Composite NOX : 0.377 0.481 0.845 0.574 1.082 0.177 0.486 3.843 1.21 0.819

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 1.831 0.306 0.543 Composite CO : 16.29 1.871 1.597 Composite NOX : 3.958 6.649 7.289

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels.

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSVMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 40 * Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.

Calendar Year: 2015 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: Yes

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3031 0.4218 0.1449 0.0360 0.0003 0.0021 0.0866 0.0053 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.437 0.532 0.929 0.634 0.558 0.110 0.337 0.357 2.20 0.555 Composite CO : 9.30 10.17 13.27 10.96 9.91 0.838 0.671 1.014 15.96 9.561 Composite NOX : 0.362 0.499 0.880 0.596 1.102 0.177 0.486 3.843 1.42 0.829

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 1.643 0.306 0.543 Composite CO : 17.81 1.871 1.597 Composite NOX : 4.030 6.649 7.289

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- 

### 2020 VMT by Speed Bin (KYSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 1 1 0.0002 0.0004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 17 0.0173 0.0276 0.0712 0.0390 0.0446 0.1441 0.6540 1 2 0.0005 0.0000 0.0033 0.0000 0.0009 0.0013 0.02 04 0.0242 0.0204 0.0976 0.0425 0.0996 0.0358 0.6535 1 3 0.0005 0.0004 0.0307 0.0019 0.0067 0.0263 0.01 90 0.0234 0.0552 0.0868 0.0338 0.0475 0.0480 0.6197 1 4 0.0006 0.0002 0.0013 0.0002 0.0022 0.0062 0.02 05 0.0243 0.0216 0.1068 0.0491 0.0905 0.0361 0.6405 1 5 0.0007 0.0000 0.0003 0.0008 0.0008 0.0020 0.00 74 0.0147 0.0247 0.0845 0.0450 0.0623 0.1139 0.6431 1 6 0.0007 0.0000 0.0003 0.0002 0.0014 0.0011 0.00 83 0.0145 0.0239 0.0883 0.0323 0.0716 0.1178 0.6395 1 7 0.0007 0.0003 0.0003 0.0013 0.0011 0.0027 0.00 98 0.0134 0.0248 0.0901 0.0333 0.0717 0.1174 0.6332 1 8 0.0007 0.0003 0.0003 0.0014 0.0015 0.0029 0.01 00 0.0135 0.0236 0.0900 0.0459 0.0629 0.1139 0.6333 1 9 0.0007 0.0000 0.0003 0.0002 0.0014 0.0015 0.00 79 0.0148 0.0235 0.0865 0.0367 0.0679 0.1193 0.6393 1 10 0.0007 0.0000 0.0003 0.0002 0.0013 0.0020 0.00 72 0.0144 0.0228 0.0848 0.0453 0.0634 0.1158 0.6419 1 11 0.0006 0.0002 0.0002 0.0013 0.0008 0.0024 0.00 84 0.0121 0.0360 0.0956 0.0344 0.0905 0.0825 0.6348 1 12 0.0006 0.0002 0.0002 0.0012 0.0007 0.0022 0.01 26 0.0334 0.0226 0.0850 0.0500 0.1131 0.0362 0.6417 1 13 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0000 0.0016 0.00 57 0.0141 0.0205 0.0898 0.0457 0.0723 0.0949 0.6545 1 14 0.0000 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 09 0.0181 0.0244 0.0679 0.0416 0.0461 0.1492 0.6512 1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0198 0.0259 0.0679 0.0435 0.0466 0.1500 0.6457 1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0196 0.0248 0.0664 0.0417 0.0467 0.1513 0.6495 1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0172 0.0231 0.0621 0.0381 0.0473 0.1550 0.6573 1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0152 0.0204 0.0576 0.0336 0.0479 0.1592 0.6662 1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0157 0.0209 0.0607 0.0349 0.0469 0.1554 0.6657 1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0165 0.0220 0.0636 0.0370 0.0462 0.1522 0.6624 1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0172 0.0230 0.0652 0.0384 0.0461 0.1509 0.6593 1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0197 0.0258 0.0700 0.0433 0.0455 0.1466 0.6490 1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 02 0.0209 0.0266 0.0713 0.0454 0.0456 0.1458 0.6443 1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0212 0.0276 0.0731 0.0471 0.0453 0.1441 0.6410 2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4825 0.0614 0.0493 0.12 35 0.1068 0.1415 0.0350 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0032 0.4979 0.0675 0.0631 0.10 76 0.0929 0.1344 0.0333 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 3 0.0000 0.0021 0.0032 0.4922 0.0724 0.0735 0.10 81 0.0812 0.1329 0.0344 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0027 0.4998 0.0712 0.0587 0.11 09 0.0913 0.1311 0.0342 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4950 0.0651 0.0516 0.11 37 0.1001 0.1396 0.0349 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.4783 0.0628 0.0494 0.11 82 0.1080 0.1465 0.0369 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4878 0.0651 0.0522 0.11 72 0.1003 0.1412 0.0362 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 8 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.4881 0.0651 0.0521 0.11 95 0.0978 0.1413 0.0360 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.4864 0.0639 0.0482 0.11 64 0.1056 0.1436 0.0359 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.5004 0.0657 0.0489 0.11 14 0.1014 0.1378 0.0344 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4920 0.0645 0.0530 0.11 64 0.0992 0.1396 0.0353 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4717 0.0633 0.0524 0.12 33 0.1047 0.1475 0.0371 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4774 0.0607 0.0493 0.11 91 0.1118 0.1463 0.0354 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 41 2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4784 0.0601 0.0420 0.12 50 0.1147 0.1451 0.0347 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4864 0.0606 0.0378 0.12 40 0.1143 0.1426 0.0343 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4837 0.0601 0.0371 0.12 38 0.1161 0.1442 0.0349 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4876 0.0606 0.0375 0.12 34 0.1138 0.1423 0.0348 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.5074 0.0625 0.0359 0.11 98 0.1079 0.1338 0.0327 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4810 0.0594 0.0351 0.12 16 0.1183 0.1469 0.0376 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4862 0.0603 0.0367 0.12 22 0.1141 0.1438 0.0369 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.5307 0.0654 0.0378 0.11 84 0.0956 0.1220 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4953 0.0620 0.0402 0.12 46 0.1071 0.1373 0.0334 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4933 0.0619 0.0409 0.12 55 0.1073 0.1379 0.0332 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4827 0.0607 0.0405 0.12 63 0.1117 0.1431 0.0349 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000



### 2020 VMT by Facility Type (KYFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 1 0.331 0.277 0.366 0.026 0.347 0.261 0.368 0.024 0.357 0.265 0.353 0.025 0.332 0.271 0.370 0.026 0.319 0.281 0.373 0.027 0.322 0.290 0.360 0.029 0.307 0.293 0.371 0.029 0.308 0.292 0.370 0.029 0.321 0.286 0.364 0.028 0.320 0.278 0.375 0.027 0.335 0.279 0.359 0.028 0.361 0.279 0.332 0.028 0.359 0.274 0.340 0.027 0.344 0.278 0.352 0.027 0.332 0.279 0.362 0.027 0.347 0.275 0.351 0.027 0.367 0.264 0.343 0.026 0.387 0.244 0.346 0.023 0.405 0.253 0.316 0.026 0.382 0.259 0.334 0.026 0.327 0.249 0.401 0.023 0.322 0.275 0.377 0.026 0.310 0.281 0.383 0.026 0.310 0.288 0.374 0.028

... Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel transit buses 

### 2 0.331 0.277 0.366 0.026 0.347 0.261 0.368 0.024 0.357 0.265 0.353 0.025 0.332 0.271 0.370 0.026 0.319 0.281 0.373 0.027 0.322 0.290 0.360 0.029 0.307 0.293 0.371 0.029 0.308 0.292 0.370 0.029 0.321 0.286 0.364 0.028 0.320 0.278 0.375 0.027 0.335 0.279 0.359 0.028 0.361 0.279 0.332 0.028 0.359 0.274 0.340 0.027 0.344 0.278 0.352 0.027 0.332 0.279 0.362 0.027 0.347 0.275 0.351 0.027Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 42

0.367 0.264 0.343 0.026 0.387 0.244 0.346 0.023 0.405 0.253 0.316 0.026 0.382 0.259 0.334 0.026 0.327 0.249 0.401 0.023 0.322 0.275 0.377 0.026 0.310 0.281 0.383 0.026 0.310 0.288 0.374 0.028



### 2020 MOBILE6.2 Input File (KYSCN.IN)
* Mobile6 file for Boone, Campbell and Kenton counties * post 2005 analysis years, includes annual scenari o * created 4/9/07,AJR, post 2005 ************************ Header Section *********** ****** MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :
POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO
PARTICULATES : * PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE
REPORT FILE : KY.RPT
DATABASE OUTPUT :
WITH FIELDNAMES : DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22
DAILY OUTPUT : EMISSIONS TABLE : kyemiss.tb1

RUN DATA

******************* ***** Run Section *******************
VMT BY HOUR : KYHVMT.D
SPEED VMT : KYSVMT.D
VMT BY FACILITY : KYFVMT.D
STAGE II REFUELING : 99 2 86. 86.
EXPAND BUS EFS : REBUILD EFFECTS : 0.30

*********** ********** Summer Scenario Section ****************
SCENARIO RECORD : KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2020 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 FUEL RVP : 7.8 FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N
PARTICLE SIZ E : 2.5 MIN/MAX TEMP : 61.0 95.0 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 43 ********************* Annual Scenario Section ***** *********** *
SCENARIO RECORD : KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2020 EVALUATION MONTH : 7

F UEL RVP : 9.0 FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSVMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 43

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 *********************************** END OF RUN   ** ***********
END OF RUN



### 2020 MOBILE6.2 Output File (KY.RPT)

*************************************************** ************************ * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: KYSCN.IN (file 2, run 1). *

*************************************************** ************************

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the followin g external * data file: KYHVMT.D

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external * data file: KYSVMT.D

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external * data file: KYFVMT.D

Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors M601 Comment: User has enabled STAGE II REFUELING.

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels.

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12
HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUIL D FRACTION IS 0.30. M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.

Calendar Year: 2020 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 61.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 95.0 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: Yes

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.2788 0.4388 0.1507 0.0365 0.0003 0.0022 0.0876 0.0051 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.357 0.448 0.715 0.516 0.461 0.076 0.245 0.344 2.51 0.464 Composite CO : 5.89 6.65 8.60 7.15 9.61 0.789 0.570 0.645 19.77 6.366 Composite NOX : 0.277 0.377 0.663 0.450 0.567 0.072 0.303 1.954 1.17 0.541

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.989 0.308 0.497 Composite CO : 17.32 0.930 1.177 Composite NOX : 2.073 2.990 4.807

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx * File 2, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels.

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSVMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 44 * Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.

Calendar Year: 2020 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: Yes

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.2788 0.4388 0.1507 0.0365 0.0003 0.0022 0.0876 0.0051 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.353 0.452 0.728 0.523 0.425 0.076 0.245 0.344 2.29 0.465 Composite CO : 8.64 9.11 11.43 9.70 10.51 0.789 0.570 0.645 16.77 8.658 Composite NOX : 0.258 0.385 0.683 0.461 0.577 0.072 0.303 1.954 1.37 0.544

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.925 0.308 0.497 Composite CO : 18.93 0.930 1.177 Composite NOX : 2.110 2.990 4.807

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 45 

# APPENDIX C

MOBILE6.2 Input/Output Files for the OKI’s Ohio Por tion of

Nonattainment AreaMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 46

VMT By Hour (OHHVMT.D), all analysis years

VMT BY HOUR 0.0478 0.0719 0.0796 0.0666 0.0563 0.0532 0.0545 0.0543 0.0515 0.0523 0.0560 0.0565 0.0504 0.0377 0.0266 0.0209 0.0197 0.0171 0.0142 0.0156 0.0188 0.0224 0.0251 0.0310



### 2005 VMT by Speed Bin (OHSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 06 0.0245 0.0260 0.0457 0.0369 0.0977 0.0216 0.7471 1 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.00 78 0.0159 0.0228 0.0486 0.0272 0.0987 0.0226 0.7556 1 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0005 0.0032 0.0028 0.01 14 0.0156 0.0236 0.0401 0.0477 0.1113 0.0925 0.6510 1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0011 0.0036 0.01 04 0.0160 0.0278 0.0461 0.0267 0.0984 0.0262 0.7431 1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0014 0.01 14 0.0169 0.0305 0.0519 0.0281 0.0984 0.0207 0.7404 1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0011 0.01 06 0.0192 0.0294 0.0551 0.0293 0.0981 0.0206 0.7365 1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0005 0.0039 0.01 17 0.0176 0.0328 0.0552 0.0288 0.0979 0.0205 0.7308 1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0009 0.0039 0.01 24 0.0173 0.0320 0.0538 0.0285 0.0980 0.0205 0.7323 1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0011 0.01 19 0.0175 0.0303 0.0524 0.0287 0.0983 0.0207 0.7389 1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0011 0.01 16 0.0170 0.0299 0.0505 0.0281 0.0985 0.0208 0.7425 1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0004 0.0034 0.01 03 0.0154 0.0288 0.0487 0.0264 0.0991 0.0208 0.7465 1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0004 0.0034 0.00 98 0.0146 0.0277 0.0463 0.0255 0.0994 0.0225 0.7501 1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 59 0.0199 0.0247 0.0465 0.0272 0.0991 0.0215 0.7551 1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 01 0.0251 0.0260 0.0408 0.0355 0.0982 0.0218 0.7525 1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0257 0.0278 0.0411 0.0370 0.0980 0.0217 0.7487 1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0246 0.0267 0.0395 0.0359 0.0982 0.0218 0.7533 1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0221 0.0239 0.0371 0.0336 0.0984 0.0221 0.7628 1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0194 0.0210 0.0331 0.0306 0.0988 0.0225 0.7745 1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0201 0.0217 0.0356 0.0318 0.0986 0.0223 0.7700 1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0213 0.0231 0.0383 0.0334 0.0983 0.0221 0.7636 1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0223 0.0241 0.0391 0.0342 0.0983 0.0220 0.7600 1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0254 0.0275 0.0433 0.0375 0.0978 0.0216 0.7469 1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0266 0.0289 0.0448 0.0387 0.0977 0.0214 0.7419 1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0277 0.0300 0.0465 0.0399 0.0975 0.0213 0.7371 2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1578 0.0620 0.0730 0.27 65 0.1939 0.2275 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 2 0.0000 0.0001 0.0003 0.1663 0.0714 0.1040 0.26 02 0.1730 0.2158 0.0090 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 3 0.0000 0.0003 0.0015 0.1669 0.0822 0.1318 0.24 18 0.1612 0.2066 0.0078 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 4 0.0000 0.0001 0.0007 0.1686 0.0757 0.1149 0.26 28 0.1640 0.2046 0.0087 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1644 0.0669 0.0913 0.28 43 0.1791 0.2046 0.0092 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1562 0.0624 0.0792 0.29 41 0.1881 0.2104 0.0096 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1608 0.0669 0.0953 0.28 68 0.1795 0.2012 0.0095 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1612 0.0679 0.0984 0.28 57 0.1780 0.1997 0.0089 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.1606 0.0644 0.0840 0.29 24 0.1866 0.2027 0.0094 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1679 0.0681 0.0894 0.28 73 0.1807 0.1974 0.0091 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1627 0.0679 0.0981 0.28 50 0.1779 0.1989 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.1531 0.0636 0.0912 0.29 32 0.1845 0.2046 0.0096 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1567 0.0616 0.0752 0.29 45 0.1960 0.2068 0.0092 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1572 0.0614 0.0694 0.28 77 0.2041 0.2111 0.0091 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1613 0.0628 0.0682 0.28 97 0.2043 0.2046 0.0090 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1598 0.0622 0.0672 0.29 05 0.2064 0.2047 0.0091 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1614 0.0628 0.0678 0.28 80 0.2032 0.2075 0.0092 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1722 0.0668 0.0686 0.28 81 0.1972 0.1983 0.0088 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1568 0.0609 0.0645 0.28 71 0.2074 0.2135 0.0099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1593 0.0619 0.0662 0.28 40 0.2024 0.2165 0.0098 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1847 0.0717 0.0727 0.28 13 0.1822 0.1991 0.0083 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1653 0.0645 0.0708 0.28 33 0.1952 0.2120 0.0089 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1645 0.0642 0.0713 0.28 37 0.1955 0.2119 0.0089 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1587 0.0620 0.0697 0.28 43 0.2002 0.2159 0.0092 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000



### 2005 VMT by Facility (OHFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 1 0.341 0.451 0.181 0.027 0.360 0.432 0.184 0.025 0.372 0.428 0.174 0.026 0.351 0.440 0.182 0.028 0.336 0.452 0.183 0.030 0.335 0.460 0.174 0.031 0.323 0.466 0.180 0.032 0.326 0.463 0.179 0.032 0.339 0.454 0.177 0.031 0.341 0.446 0.183 0.030Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 47

0.355 0.441 0.174 0.030 0.375 0.435 0.160 0.030 0.376 0.430 0.165 0.029 0.362 0.438 0.172 0.028 0.354 0.441 0.176 0.029 0.368 0.433 0.170 0.029 0.392 0.415 0.166 0.027 0.420 0.388 0.167 0.025 0.425 0.398 0.150 0.027 0.400 0.413 0.160 0.027 0.357 0.418 0.200 0.025 0.340 0.446 0.186 0.028 0.328 0.454 0.190 0.028 0.325 0.462 0.184 0.029

... Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel transit buses 

### 26 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014



### 2005 Vehicle Age Distribution File (OHREG.D), all a nalysis years

REG DIST * OHREG.D * This file contains the Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren * vehicle age distribution for LDV,LDT1,LDT2,LDT3, * and LDT4 vehicles from ODOT/OEPA 2004 VIN decodin g project. * MOBILE6 default distributions are used for the re maining * vehicle classes.
* * LDV 1 0.0286 0.0381 0.0426 0.0379 0.0991 0.1052 0.0903 0.0968 0.0763 0.0745 0.0590 0.0502Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 48

0.0414 0.0335 0.0304 0.0232 0.0182 0.0128 0.0102 0.0066 0.0048 0.0023 0.0013 0.0009 0.0158 * LDT1 2 0.0278 0.0371 0.0412 0.0210 0.0450 0.0478 0.0564 0.0525 0.0865 0.0706 0.0922 0.0696 0.0503 0.0587 0.0469 0.0439 0.0418 0.0360 0.0280 0.0143 0.0074 0.0038 0.0044 0.0028 0.014 * LDT2 3 0.0345 0.0460 0.0511 0.0478 0.1204 0.1327 0.1232 0.1125 0.0802 0.0690 0.0550 0.0412 0.0269 0.0164 0.0120 0.0080 0.0095 0.0026 0.0029 0.0016 0.0016 0.0006 0.0005 0.0005 0.0033 * LDT3 4 0.0287 0.0383 0.0424 0.0398 0.1031 0.1525 0.0769 0.0740 0.0677 0.0768 0.0578 0.0461 0.0317 0.0221 0.0252 0.0249 0.0219 0.0136 0.0124 0.0083 0.0068 0.0030 0.0021 0.0008 0.0231 * LDT4 5 0.0386 0.0514 0.0569 0.0489 0.1129 0.2054 0.1223 0.1113 0.0698 0.0629 0.0500 0.0078 0.0133 0.0043 0.0046 0.0037 0.0039 0.0030 0.0030 0.0021 0.0018 0.0005 0.0002 0.0000 0.0214



### 2005 MOBILE6.2 Input File (OH.SCN) * Mobile6 file for Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and W arren counties, * OBD program initiated on 1/5/04 * created 05/30/06 by ajr, new OEPA inputs for ozon e, pre 2006 ******************* Header Section ************** ********** MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :
POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO
PARTICULATES : * PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE
REPORT FILE : OH.RPT
DATABASE OUTPUT :
WITH FIELDNAMES : DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22
DAILY OUTPUT : EMISSIONS TABLE : ohemiss.tb1

RUN DATA ******************* Run Section ***************** **********
VMT BY HOUR : OHHVMT.D
SPEED VMT : OHSVMT.D
VMT BY FACILITY : OHFVMT.D
REG DIST : OHREG.D FUEL RVP : 9.0
EXPRESS HC AS VOC : * ANTI- TAMPERING PROGRAM
ANTI-TAMP PROG : 96 78 50 22222 21111111 1 12 098. 12111112

* I/M PROGRAM(S) * OBD I/M PROGRAM : 1 2004 2005 2 T/O OBD I/M I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1996 2050Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 49

I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 21111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 1 30.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 98.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 1.0 1.0 I/M EXEMPTION AGE : 1 25 I/M GRACE PERIOD : 1 2

* EVAP OBD with no post '07 HDGV I/M PROGRAM : 2 2004 2005 2 T/O EVAP OBD & G C I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1996 2007 I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 98.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 1.0 1.0 I/M EXEMPTION AGE : 2 25 I/M GRACE PERIOD : 2 2

* ASM 2525 I/M PROGRAM : 4 2001 2005 2 T/O ASM 2525 PHA SE- IN I/M MODEL YEARS : 4 1982 1995 I/M VEHICLES : 4 22222 21111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 4 30.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 4 98.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 4 1.0 1.0 I/M EXEMPTION AGE : 4 25 I/M GRACE PERIOD : 4 2

* IDLE I/M PROGRAM : 5 1998 2000 2 T/O IDLE I/M MODEL YEARS : 5 1973 1996 I/M VEHICLES : 5 22222 21111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 5 30.0 I/M COMPLIANCE : 5 98.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 5 1.0 1.0 I/M EXEMPTION AGE : 5 25 I/M GRACE PERIOD : 5 2

* IM 240 I/M PROGRAM : 6 1996 1997 2 T/O IM240 I/M MODEL YEARS : 6 1971 1994 I/M VEHICLES : 6 22222 21111111 1 I/M STRINGENCY : 6 30.0 I/M COMPLIA NCE : 6 98.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 6 1.0 1.0 I/M EXEMPTION AGE : 6 25 I/M CUTPOINTs : 6 CUTPOINT.D I/M GRACE PERIOD : 6 2

* GC I/M PROGRAM : 7 1996 2005 2 T/O GC I/M MODEL YEARS : 7 1982 1995 I/M VEHICLES : 7 22222 21111111 1 I/M COMPLIANCE : 7 98.0 I/M WAIVER RATES : 7 1.0 1.0 I/M EXEMPTION AGE : 7 25 I/M GRACE PERIOD : 7 2 FUEL PROGRAM : 1 OXYGENATED FUELS : .000 .420 .000 .036 2Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 50

STAGE II REFUELING : 93 3 86. 86.
EXPAND BUS EFS : ******************* Summer Scenario Section ***** ********** SCENARIO RECORD : Ohio Emissions - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2005 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 SEASON : 1 MIN/MAX TEMP : 61.0 95.0 PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV
DIESEL SULFUR : 317.00 ******************* Annual Scenario Section ***** ********** SCENARIO RECORD : Ohio Emissions - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2005 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0
PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 317.00 ******************* End of Run ****************** **********
END OF RUN



### 2005 MOBILE6.2 Output Report (OH.RPT)

*************************************************** ************************ * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: OHSCN.IN (file 3, run 1). *

*************************************************** ************************

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the followin g external * data file: OHHVMT.D

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external * data file: OHSVMT.D

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external * data file: OHFVMT.D

Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors

* Reading Registration Distributions from the follo wing external * data file: OHREG.D

* Reading ASM I/M Test Credits from ASMDATA.D

* Reading non-default I/M CUTPOINTS from the follow ing external * data file: CUTPOINT.D M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels. M601 Comment: User has enabled STAGE II REFUELING.

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Ohio Emissions - CY20xx * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV *** I/M credits for Tech1&2 vehicles were read from the following external data file: TECH12.D M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b

Calendar Year: 2005 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 61.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 95.0 (F)Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 51 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 8.9 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 92. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Ether Blend Market Share: 0.000 Alcohol Bl end Market Share: 0.420 Ether Blend Oxygen Content: 0.000 Alcohol Bl end Oxygen Content: 0.036 Alcohol B lend RVP Waiver: Yes

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.4050 0.3396 0.1270 0.0359 0.0006 0.0019 0.0845 0.0057 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 1.251 1.047 1.216 1.093 1.894 0.644 0.657 0.579 3.53 1.155 Composite CO : 12.48 13.44 15.01 13.87 18.13 1.751 1.132 3.410 17.88 12.568 Composite NOX : 0.915 1.164 1.494 1.254 4.265 1.606 1.480 12.715 1.23 2.194

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0009 0.0016

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 8.840 0.583 0.787 Composite CO : 114.81 4.539 2.970 Composite NOX : 8.411 16.545 13.772

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Ohio Emissions - CY20xx * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b

Calendar Year: 2005 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 9.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 92. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: Yes Evap I/M Program: Yes ATP Program: Yes Reformulated Gas: No

Ether Blend Market Share: 0.000 Alcohol Bl end Market Share: 0.420 Ether Blend Oxygen Content: 0.000 Alcohol Bl end Oxygen Content: 0.036 Alcohol B lend RVP Waiver: Yes

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.4050 0.3396 0.1270 0.0359 0.0006 0.0019 0.0845 0.0057 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.994 0.913 1.096 0.963 1.414 0.644 0.657 0.579 2.15 0.965 Composite CO : 13.81 16.00 17.13 16.31 16.88 1.751 1.132 3.410 15.23 14.185 Composite NOX : 0.892 1.205 1.546 1.298 4.367 1.606 1.480 12.715 1.45 2.210

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0009 0.0016

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 6.768 0.583 0.787 Composite CO : 99.19 4.539 2.970 Composite NOX : 8.902 16.545 13.772

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------



### 2008 VMT by Speed bin (OHSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 09 0.0170 0.0245 0.0392 0.0435 0.0977 0.0165 0.7606 1 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0000 0.0012 0.00 63 0.0104 0.0223 0.0401 0.0340 0.0993 0.0282 0.7579 1 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0008 0.0019 0.0021 0.0026 0.00 75 0.0099 0.0233 0.0378 0.0426 0.1159 0.0909 0.6648 1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 0.0021 0.0028 0.00 79 0.0105 0.0250 0.0373 0.0337 0.0979 0.0282 0.7536 1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0021 0.00 81 0.0127 0.0269 0.0418 0.0349 0.0981 0.0161 0.7588 1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0022 0.00 82 0.0126 0.0285 0.0434 0.0362 0.0975 0.0165 0.7550 1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0021 0.0024 0.01 00 0.0121 0.0307 0.0413 0.0367 0.0979 0.0160 0.7508Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 52 1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0005 0.0022 0.0024 0.01 02 0.0117 0.0310 0.0398 0.0356 0.0976 0.0160 0.7529 1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.0024 0.00 79 0.0129 0.0281 0.0415 0.0342 0.0976 0.0161 0.7589 1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.0024 0.00 79 0.0125 0.0271 0.0405 0.0330 0.0974 0.0162 0.7627 1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0017 0.0022 0.00 88 0.0105 0.0269 0.0373 0.0318 0.0979 0.0191 0.7637 1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0017 0.0021 0.00 84 0.0099 0.0259 0.0360 0.0300 0.0990 0.0260 0.7608 1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.00 62 0.0120 0.0252 0.0373 0.0299 0.0981 0.0165 0.7746 1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 05 0.0170 0.0249 0.0343 0.0378 0.0969 0.0169 0.7717 1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0183 0.0260 0.0332 0.0398 0.0963 0.0169 0.7695 1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0176 0.0249 0.0322 0.0381 0.0962 0.0170 0.7740 1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0158 0.0224 0.0308 0.0358 0.0952 0.0172 0.7827 1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0139 0.0197 0.0281 0.0312 0.0946 0.0175 0.7949 1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0144 0.0203 0.0302 0.0343 0.0955 0.0173 0.7879 1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0153 0.0216 0.0322 0.0375 0.0961 0.0171 0.7802 1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0160 0.0225 0.0327 0.0383 0.0964 0.0170 0.7771 1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0182 0.0257 0.0353 0.0428 0.0971 0.0167 0.7642 1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0191 0.0270 0.0361 0.0443 0.0971 0.0166 0.7598 1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0198 0.0280 0.0372 0.0463 0.0974 0.0165 0.7547 2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2542 0.0514 0.0702 0.23 35 0.1911 0.1904 0.0091 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 2 0.0001 0.0001 0.0004 0.2669 0.0666 0.1030 0.20 50 0.1671 0.1821 0.0088 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 3 0.0001 0.0004 0.0029 0.2676 0.0786 0.1230 0.19 61 0.1486 0.1736 0.0091 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 4 0.0000 0.0001 0.0007 0.2734 0.0676 0.1091 0.21 27 0.1617 0.1652 0.0094 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.2685 0.0580 0.0845 0.23 34 0.1818 0.1639 0.0099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2570 0.0536 0.0767 0.24 17 0.1915 0.1692 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.2648 0.0578 0.0871 0.23 99 0.1785 0.1616 0.0101 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.2656 0.0588 0.0893 0.23 92 0.1771 0.1596 0.0102 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2642 0.0561 0.0787 0.24 02 0.1894 0.1611 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.2747 0.0590 0.0818 0.23 51 0.1837 0.1556 0.0100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.2673 0.0591 0.0898 0.23 73 0.1770 0.1593 0.0100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2537 0.0550 0.0864 0.24 55 0.1838 0.1652 0.0104 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2577 0.0527 0.0716 0.24 18 0.2005 0.1656 0.0101 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2570 0.0520 0.0636 0.24 13 0.2055 0.1706 0.0098 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2642 0.0534 0.0618 0.24 15 0.2062 0.1630 0.0099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2625 0.0531 0.0609 0.24 17 0.2090 0.1626 0.0101 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2640 0.0534 0.0613 0.24 04 0.2048 0.1662 0.0099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2796 0.0566 0.0610 0.23 94 0.1974 0.1565 0.0096 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2581 0.0522 0.0580 0.23 89 0.2104 0.1720 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2603 0.0526 0.0596 0.23 77 0.2036 0.1762 0.0100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2941 0.0595 0.0641 0.23 59 0.1782 0.1596 0.0086 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2672 0.0540 0.0641 0.23 87 0.1940 0.1726 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2660 0.0538 0.0648 0.23 92 0.1943 0.1726 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2582 0.0522 0.0637 0.23 96 0.2003 0.1764 0.0096 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000



### 2008 VMT by Facility Type (OHFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 1 0.322 0.427 0.234 0.017 0.339 0.409 0.236 0.016 0.353 0.404 0.226 0.017 0.332 0.412 0.238 0.018 0.319 0.422 0.239 0.019 0.320 0.431 0.229 0.020 0.308 0.434 0.238 0.020 0.311 0.431 0.237 0.020 0.324 0.424 0.233 0.020 0.325 0.415 0.241 0.019 0.339 0.412 0.230 0.019 0.361 0.407 0.213 0.019 0.360 0.403 0.218 0.018 0.345 0.411 0.225 0.018 0.337 0.413 0.232 0.019 0.352 0.405 0.225 0.019 0.373 0.391 0.219 0.018 0.398 0.365 0.220 0.016 0.407 0.376 0.200 0.017 0.381 0.390 0.211 0.017 0.334 0.392 0.259 0.016 0.321 0.419 0.242 0.018 0.309 0.426 0.246 0.018Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 53

0.308 0.434 0.239 0.019

... Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel transit buses 

### 26 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007



### 2008 MOBILE6.2 Input File (OHSCN.IN) * Mobile6 input file for Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren counties, * low RVP beginning summer 2008 * created 4/9/07 by ajr, includes annual scenario,l ow RVP,post 2007 ******************* Header Section ************** ********** MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :
POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO
PARTICULATES : * PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE REPORT FILE : oh.rpt
DATABASE OUTPUT :
WITH FIELDNAMES : DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22
DAILY OUTPUT : EMISSIONS TABLE : ohemiss.tb1

RUN DATA ******************* Run Section ***************** **********
VMT BY HOUR : OHHVMT.D
SPEED VMT : OHSVMT.D
VMT BY FACILITY : OHFVMT.D
REG DIST : OHREG.D FUEL PROGRAM : 1 OXYGENATED FUELS : .000 .420 .000 .036 2
STAGE II REFUELING : 93 3 86. 86.
EXPAND BUS EFS : REBUILD EFFECTS : 0.10 ******************* Summer Scenario Section ***** **********Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 54 SCENARIO RECORD : Ohio Emissions - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2008 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 FUEL RVP : 7.8 SEASON : 1 MIN/MAX TEMP : 62.0 91.3 PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 43 ******************* Annual Scenario Section ***** ********** SCENARIO RECORD : Ohio Emissions - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2008 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 FUEL RVP : 9.0 MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 43 ******************* End of Run ****************** **********
END OF RUN



### 2008 MOBILE6.2 Output Report (OH.RPT)

*************************************************** ************************ * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: OHSCN.IN (file 3, run 1). *

*************************************************** ************************

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the followin g external * data file: OHHVMT.D

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external * data file: OHSVMT.D

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external * data file: OHFVMT.D

Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors

* Reading Registration Distributions from the follo wing external * data file: OHREG.D M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels. M601 Comment: User has enabled STAGE II REFUELING.

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Ohio Emissions - CY20xx * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b
HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUIL D FRACTION IS 0.10. M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.

Calendar Year: 2008 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 62.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 91.3 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 8.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: NoMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 55 Ether Blend Market Share: 0.000 Alcohol Bl end Market Share: 0.420 Ether Blend Oxygen Content: 0.000 Alcohol Bl end Oxygen Content: 0.036 Alcohol B lend RVP Waiver: Yes

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3623 0.3705 0.1385 0.0357 0.0004 0.0020 0.0851 0.0055 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.923 0.802 1.007 0.858 1.312 0.344 0.566 0.516 2.74 0.878 Composite CO : 9.49 10.52 12.46 11.05 14.02 1.351 0.961 2.825 18.05 9.905 Composite NOX : 0.741 0.965 1.408 1.085 2.929 0.875 1.174 10.042 1.22 1.790

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0002 0.0009 0.0017

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 7.094 0.399 0.742 Composite CO : 94.69 3.770 2.830 Composite NOX : 7.696 14.196 12.082

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Ohio Emissions - CY20xx * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.

Calendar Year: 2008 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 9.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: No

Ether Blend Market Share: 0.000 Alcohol Bl end Market Share: 0.420 Ether Blend Oxygen Content: 0.000 Alcohol Bl end Oxygen Content: 0.036 Alcohol B lend RVP Waiver: Yes

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.3623 0.3705 0.1385 0.0357 0.0004 0.0020 0.0851 0.0055 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.880 0.817 1.051 0.881 1.177 0.344 0.566 0.516 2.21 0.866 Composite CO : 12.77 14.60 16.75 15.18 14.75 1.351 0.961 2.825 16.12 13.214 Composite NOX : 0.736 1.018 1.487 1.146 2.981 0.875 1.174 10.042 1.42 1.822

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0002 0.0009 0.0017

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 6.413 0.399 0.742 Composite CO : 91.20 3.770 2.830 Composite NOX : 8.489 14.196 12.082

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- 

### 2015 VMT by Speed Bin (OHSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 10 0.0166 0.0177 0.0522 0.0350 0.1026 0.0217 0.7531 1 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0014 0.00 60 0.0104 0.0153 0.0512 0.0329 0.0986 0.0326 0.7514 1 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0005 0.0015 0.0021 0.0023 0.00 97 0.0118 0.0280 0.0446 0.0425 0.1089 0.0504 0.6978 1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0012 0.0010 0.0031 0.00 84 0.0118 0.0171 0.0469 0.0333 0.0990 0.0334 0.7449 1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0009 0.0012 0.00 74 0.0141 0.0185 0.0523 0.0352 0.0982 0.0227 0.7494 1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0016 0.00 76 0.0142 0.0199 0.0541 0.0359 0.0982 0.0216 0.7466 1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0013 0.0020 0.01 03 0.0146 0.0197 0.0533 0.0363 0.0983 0.0215 0.7422 1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0017 0.0022 0.01 04 0.0140 0.0196 0.0521 0.0357 0.0984 0.0216 0.7440 1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0014 0.00 74 0.0149 0.0191 0.0515 0.0354 0.0983 0.0217 0.7498 1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0014 0.00 74 0.0143 0.0186 0.0498 0.0347 0.0983 0.0228 0.7523 1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0011 0.0017 0.00 90 0.0128 0.0173 0.0465 0.0336 0.0983 0.0230 0.7562 1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.0011 0.0021 0.00 84 0.0120 0.0165 0.0444 0.0325 0.0995 0.0326 0.7506Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 56 1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.00 55 0.0122 0.0174 0.0453 0.0329 0.0985 0.0232 0.7643 1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 07 0.0170 0.0178 0.0429 0.0340 0.1035 0.0221 0.7620 1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0185 0.0186 0.0430 0.0352 0.1035 0.0221 0.7591 1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0177 0.0179 0.0412 0.0341 0.1035 0.0222 0.7633 1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0159 0.0160 0.0394 0.0320 0.1032 0.0225 0.7710 1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0140 0.0141 0.0346 0.0292 0.1032 0.0229 0.7820 1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0144 0.0145 0.0385 0.0303 0.1030 0.0226 0.7766 1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0153 0.0154 0.0422 0.0319 0.1029 0.0224 0.7699 1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0160 0.0161 0.0428 0.0327 0.1031 0.0223 0.7671 1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0183 0.0184 0.0473 0.0357 0.1031 0.0219 0.7553 1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0192 0.0193 0.0487 0.0369 0.1032 0.0218 0.7510 1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0199 0.0201 0.0508 0.0381 0.1031 0.0216 0.7464 2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2312 0.0536 0.0672 0.23 61 0.1827 0.2125 0.0167 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 2 0.0000 0.0003 0.0007 0.2425 0.0638 0.0960 0.21 45 0.1665 0.1997 0.0159 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 3 0.0000 0.0010 0.0020 0.2432 0.0746 0.1140 0.20 82 0.1479 0.1937 0.0153 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 4 0.0000 0.0005 0.0006 0.2465 0.0686 0.1025 0.21 70 0.1588 0.1885 0.0170 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.2407 0.0592 0.0853 0.23 34 0.1750 0.1887 0.0173 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.2299 0.0541 0.0771 0.24 16 0.1843 0.1951 0.0179 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.2363 0.0594 0.0881 0.23 59 0.1754 0.1866 0.0179 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.2369 0.0602 0.0901 0.23 68 0.1726 0.1850 0.0179 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.2359 0.0561 0.0798 0.24 08 0.1817 0.1876 0.0178 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.2454 0.0596 0.0838 0.23 55 0.1760 0.1820 0.0174 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 11 0.0000 0.0001 0.0004 0.2388 0.0603 0.0908 0.23 36 0.1739 0.1845 0.0176 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.2263 0.0561 0.0867 0.24 08 0.1809 0.1909 0.0181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2302 0.0536 0.0726 0.24 35 0.1904 0.1922 0.0175 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2307 0.0529 0.0627 0.24 60 0.1936 0.1970 0.0171 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2364 0.0540 0.0612 0.24 68 0.1938 0.1905 0.0171 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2345 0.0536 0.0605 0.24 75 0.1959 0.1907 0.0174 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2365 0.0540 0.0609 0.24 53 0.1927 0.1933 0.0173 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2508 0.0571 0.0611 0.24 38 0.1865 0.1840 0.0167 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2305 0.0525 0.0580 0.24 45 0.1969 0.1994 0.0182 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2337 0.0533 0.0595 0.24 20 0.1919 0.2018 0.0178 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2672 0.0608 0.0643 0.23 73 0.1717 0.1831 0.0155 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2415 0.0553 0.0634 0.24 16 0.1849 0.1968 0.0166 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2404 0.0551 0.0639 0.24 21 0.1852 0.1968 0.0165 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2327 0.0534 0.0627 0.24 31 0.1900 0.2010 0.0170 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000



### 2015 VMT by Facility Type (OHFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 1 0.328 0.428 0.225 0.019 0.346 0.409 0.228 0.018 0.359 0.406 0.217 0.019 0.337 0.416 0.227 0.020 0.323 0.427 0.229 0.021 0.323 0.436 0.219 0.022 0.311 0.440 0.227 0.022 0.314 0.438 0.226 0.022 0.327 0.430 0.222 0.022 0.328 0.421 0.230 0.021 0.342 0.418 0.219 0.021 0.363 0.414 0.202 0.021 0.364 0.408 0.208 0.020 0.350 0.415 0.215 0.020 0.341 0.418 0.221 0.021 0.356 0.410 0.214 0.020 0.378 0.394 0.208 0.019 0.404 0.368 0.210 0.018 0.412 0.380 0.190 0.019 0.386 0.393 0.202 0.019 0.341 0.393 0.249 0.018 0.327 0.421 0.232 0.019 0.315 0.429 0.236 0.020 0.312 0.438 0.229 0.021

... Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel transit busesMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 57

26 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009



### 2015 MOBILE6.2 Input File (OHSCN.IN) * Mobile6 input file for Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren counties, * low RVP beginning summer 2008 * created 4/9/07 by ajr, includes annual scenario,l ow RVP,post 2007

************* ****** Header Section ************************ MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :
POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO
PARTICULATES : * PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE REPORT FILE : oh.rpt
DATABASE OUTPUT :
WITH FIELDNAMES : DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22
DAILY OUTPUT : EMISSIONS TABLE : ohemiss.tb1

RUN DATA ******************* Run Section ***************** **********
VMT BY HOUR : OHHVMT.D
SPEED VMT : OHSVMT.D
VMT BY FACILITY : OHFVMT.D
REG DIST : OHREG.D FUEL PROGRAM : 1 OXYGENATED FUELS : .000 .420 .000 .036 2
STAGE II REFUELING : 93 3 86. 86.
EXPAND BUS EFS :
REBUILD EFF ECTS : 0.10Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 58

******************* Summer Scenario Section ***** ********** SCENARIO RECORD : Ohio Emissions - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2015 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 FUEL RVP : 7.8
SEASON : 1 MIN/MAX TEMP : 62.0 91.3 PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 43 ******************* Annual Scenario Section ***** ********** SCENARIO RECORD : Ohio Emissions - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2015

E VALUATION MONTH : 7 FUEL RVP : 9.0 MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 43 ******************* End of Run ****************** **********
END OF RUN



### 2015 MOBILE6.2 Output File (OH.RPT)

*************************************************** ************************ * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: OHSCN.IN (file 3, run 1). *

*************************************************** ************************

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the followin g external * data file: OHHVMT.D

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external * data file: OHSVMT.D

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external * data file: OHFVMT.D

Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors

* Reading Registration Distributions from the follo wing external * data file: OHREG.D M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels. M601 Comment: User has enabled STAGE II REFUELING.

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Ohio Emissions - CY20xx * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12
HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUIL D FRACTION IS 0.10. M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.

Calendar Year: 2015 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 62.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 91.3 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lbMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 59 Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 8.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: No

Ether Blend Market Share: 0.000 Alcohol Bl end Market Share: 0.420 Ether Blend Oxygen Content: 0.000 Alcohol Bl end Oxygen Content: 0.036 Alcohol B lend RVP Waiver: Yes

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.2935 0.4202 0.1571 0.0357 0.0003 0.0023 0.0858 0.0052 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.491 0.462 0.588 0.496 0.674 0.112 0.213 0.340 2.71 0.498 Composite CO : 6.84 7.42 8.25 7.65 8.93 0.820 0.479 0.951 17.80 6.917 Composite NOX : 0.379 0.455 0.622 0.500 1.098 0.173 0.308 3.792 1.23 0.772

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0009 0.0019

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 2.023 0.284 0.518 Composite CO : 16.22 1.696 1.499 Composite NOX : 4.015 6.477 7.115

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Ohio Emissions - CY20xx * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.

Calendar Year: 2015 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 9.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: No

Ether Blend Market Share: 0.000 Alcohol Bl end Market Share: 0.420 Ether Blend Oxygen Content: 0.000 Alcohol Bl end Oxygen Content: 0.036 Alcohol B lend RVP Waiver: Yes

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.2935 0.4202 0.1571 0.0357 0.0003 0.0023 0.0858 0.0052 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.483 0.483 0.616 0.519 0.605 0.112 0.213 0.340 2.18 0.504 Composite CO : 10.09 10.46 11.35 10.70 9.79 0.820 0.479 0.951 15.90 9.654 Composite NOX : 0.373 0.476 0.651 0.523 1.104 0.173 0.308 3.792 1.43 0.784

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0009 0.0019

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 1.794 0.284 0.518 Composite CO : 17.78 1.696 1.499 Composite NOX : 4.036 6.477 7.115

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------



### 2020 VMT by Speed Bin (OHSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 10 0.0164 0.0170 0.0526 0.0353 0.1036 0.0214 0.7526 1 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0001 0.0005 0.0008 0.00 62 0.0106 0.0166 0.0490 0.0342 0.0987 0.0469 0.7362 1 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 0.0019 0.0018 0.0038 0.01 03 0.0195 0.0277 0.0554 0.0287 0.1103 0.0632 0.6766 1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0013 0.0016 0.0032 0.00 81 0.0121 0.0164 0.0478 0.0326 0.1078 0.0460 0.7230Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 60 1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0009 0.0016 0.00 86 0.0128 0.0188 0.0511 0.0352 0.0993 0.0223 0.7493 1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0011 0.00 85 0.0132 0.0202 0.0530 0.0364 0.0992 0.0213 0.7465 1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0008 0.0013 0.0031 0.00 91 0.0149 0.0190 0.0535 0.0355 0.0994 0.0221 0.7413 1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 0.0014 0.0037 0.00 96 0.0140 0.0187 0.0518 0.0350 0.0994 0.0222 0.7431 1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0008 0.0018 0.00 85 0.0129 0.0198 0.0501 0.0356 0.0994 0.0224 0.7488 1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0017 0.00 82 0.0125 0.0192 0.0487 0.0348 0.0994 0.0225 0.7522 1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0011 0.0028 0.00 80 0.0131 0.0167 0.0466 0.0330 0.1003 0.0293 0.7485 1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0012 0.0025 0.00 78 0.0123 0.0166 0.0437 0.0319 0.1006 0.0406 0.7422 1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0008 0.00 58 0.0117 0.0168 0.0451 0.0332 0.0996 0.0228 0.7642 1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 09 0.0164 0.0173 0.0435 0.0339 0.1045 0.0218 0.7618 1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0181 0.0181 0.0431 0.0355 0.1045 0.0217 0.7590 1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0173 0.0173 0.0413 0.0344 0.1045 0.0219 0.7632 1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0156 0.0156 0.0395 0.0324 0.1041 0.0222 0.7707 1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0137 0.0137 0.0348 0.0296 0.1042 0.0225 0.7816 1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0141 0.0141 0.0387 0.0307 0.1040 0.0223 0.7761 1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0150 0.0149 0.0425 0.0322 0.1039 0.0220 0.7694 1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0157 0.0156 0.0430 0.0330 0.1040 0.0219 0.7667 1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0179 0.0178 0.0476 0.0360 0.1041 0.0215 0.7550 1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0188 0.0187 0.0489 0.0372 0.1041 0.0214 0.7508 1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 00 0.0195 0.0195 0.0511 0.0383 0.1041 0.0213 0.7462 2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2688 0.0500 0.0658 0.22 43 0.1692 0.2056 0.0162 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 2 0.0001 0.0004 0.0006 0.2824 0.0622 0.0970 0.19 74 0.1545 0.1910 0.0145 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 3 0.0001 0.0010 0.0032 0.2832 0.0763 0.1114 0.19 12 0.1380 0.1821 0.0134 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 4 0.0000 0.0006 0.0011 0.2864 0.0669 0.1044 0.20 08 0.1441 0.1799 0.0158 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 5 0.0000 0.0001 0.0005 0.2800 0.0563 0.0875 0.21 59 0.1609 0.1819 0.0168 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.2681 0.0522 0.0785 0.22 48 0.1703 0.1885 0.0174 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 7 0.0000 0.0001 0.0006 0.2754 0.0573 0.0907 0.21 86 0.1593 0.1806 0.0174 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 8 0.0000 0.0002 0.0005 0.2765 0.0580 0.0922 0.21 89 0.1584 0.1780 0.0174 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.2747 0.0542 0.0818 0.22 28 0.1682 0.1808 0.0173 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 10 0.0000 0.0001 0.0005 0.2853 0.0572 0.0854 0.21 66 0.1631 0.1750 0.0168 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 11 0.0000 0.0001 0.0006 0.2783 0.0577 0.0923 0.21 79 0.1576 0.1785 0.0171 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.2643 0.0540 0.0880 0.22 74 0.1638 0.1844 0.0176 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2684 0.0500 0.0730 0.23 02 0.1753 0.1861 0.0170 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2686 0.0493 0.0605 0.23 34 0.1809 0.1908 0.0166 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2752 0.0503 0.0588 0.23 39 0.1810 0.1843 0.0166 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2731 0.0499 0.0580 0.23 46 0.1830 0.1846 0.0169 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2753 0.0503 0.0584 0.23 24 0.1799 0.1870 0.0168 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2911 0.0530 0.0584 0.23 03 0.1736 0.1774 0.0161 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2688 0.0490 0.0557 0.23 18 0.1841 0.1930 0.0177 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2721 0.0497 0.0571 0.22 93 0.1793 0.1952 0.0173 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3086 0.0562 0.0612 0.22 37 0.1594 0.1759 0.0150 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2804 0.0514 0.0608 0.22 89 0.1724 0.1901 0.0161 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2792 0.0512 0.0613 0.22 94 0.1728 0.1902 0.0160 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2707 0.0497 0.0603 0.23 07 0.1775 0.1946 0.0166 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000



### 2020 VMT by Facility Type (OHFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 1 0.319 0.414 0.249 0.018 0.336 0.395 0.252 0.017 0.349 0.393 0.241 0.018 0.328 0.401 0.253 0.019 0.314 0.412 0.254 0.020 0.315 0.421 0.244 0.021 0.303 0.424 0.252 0.021 0.306 0.422 0.251 0.021 0.318 0.414 0.247 0.021 0.319 0.405 0.256 0.020 0.333 0.403 0.244 0.020 0.355 0.400 0.225 0.020 0.354 0.395 0.232 0.019 0.340 0.402 0.239 0.019 0.331 0.403 0.246 0.019 0.346 0.396 0.238 0.019 0.368 0.381 0.232 0.018 0.393 0.355 0.235 0.017 0.402 0.368 0.212 0.018 0.376 0.380 0.225 0.018 0.330 0.377 0.276 0.017Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 61

0.317 0.406 0.258 0.018 0.305 0.414 0.262 0.019 0.304 0.423 0.254 0.020

... Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel transit buses 

### 26 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009



### 2020 MOBILE6.2 Input File (OHSCN.IN)

* Mobile6 input file for Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren counties, * low RVP beginning summer 2008 * created 4/9/07 by ajr, includes annual scenario,l ow RVP,post 2007 ******************* Header Section ************** ********** MOBILE6 INPUT FILE :
POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO
PARTICULATES : * PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE REPORT FILE : oh.rpt
DATABASE OUTPUT :
WITH FIELDNAMES : DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22
DAILY OUTPUT : EMISSIONS TABLE : ohemiss.tb1

RUN DATA ******************* Run Section ***************** **********
VMT BY HOUR : OHHVMT.D
SPEED VMT : OHSVMT.D
VMT BY FACILITY : OHFVMT.D
REG DIST : OHREG.D FUEL PROGRAM : 1 OXYGENATED FUELS : .000 .420 .000 .036 2
STAGE II REFUELING : 93 3 86. 86.
EXPAND BUS EFS : REBUILD EFFECTS : 0.10 ******************* Summer Scenario Section ***** ********** SCENARIO RECORD : Ohio Emissions - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2020 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 FUEL RVP : 7.8 SEASON : 1 MIN/MAX TEMP : 62.0 91.3 PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 43 ******************* Annual Scenario Section ***** ********** SCENARIO RECORD : Ohio Emissions - CY20xx CALENDAR YEAR : 2020 EVALUATION MONTH : 7 FUEL RVP : 9.0 MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.C SV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV DIESEL SULFUR : 43 ******************* End of Run ****************** **********Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 62 END OF RUN

2020 MOBILE6.2 Output File (OH.RPT)

*************************************************** ************************ * MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * * Input file: OHSCN.IN (file 3, run 1). *

*************************************************** ************************

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the followin g external * data file: OHHVMT.D

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external * data file: OHSVMT.D

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external * data file: OHFVMT.D

Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors

* Reading Registration Distributions from the follo wing external * data file: OHREG.D M616 Comment: User has supplied post-1999 sulfur l evels. M601 Comment: User has enabled STAGE II REFUELING.

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Ohio Emissions - CY20xx * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 1. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSV

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12
HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUIL D FRACTION IS 0.10. M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.

Calendar Year: 2020 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 62.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 91.3 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi Weathered RVP: 8.0 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: No

Ether Blend Market Share: 0.000 Alcohol Bl end Market Share: 0.420 Ether Blend Oxygen Content: 0.000 Alcohol Bl end Oxygen Content: 0.036 Alcohol B lend RVP Waiver: Yes

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.2697 0.4367 0.1632 0.0361 0.0002 0.0024 0.0866 0.0051 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.406 0.411 0.498 0.435 0.483 0.071 0.150 0.311 2.74 0.429 Composite CO : 6.26 6.92 7.62 7.11 8.96 0.738 0.426 0.572 18.16 6.420 Composite NOX : 0.282 0.365 0.489 0.399 0.586 0.066 0.188 1.946 1.22 0.512

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 1.010 0.275 0.449 Composite CO : 16.27 0.806 1.044 Composite NOX : 2.141 2.876 4.709

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # * Ohio Emissions - CY20xx * File 3, Run 1, Scenario 2. * # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels * from the external data file PMGZML.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels * from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels * from the external data file PMDZML.CSVMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 63 * Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates * from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b M 48 Warning: there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 M111 Warning: The input dIesel sulfur level of 43 .0 ppm exceeds the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limi t of 15 ppm.

Calendar Year: 2020 Month: July Altitude: Low Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi Weathered RVP: 9.5 psi Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm

Exhaust I/M Program: No Evap I/M Program: No ATP Program: No Reformulated Gas: No

Ether Blend Market Share: 0.000 Alcohol Bl end Market Share: 0.420 Ether Blend Oxygen Content: 0.000 Alcohol Bl end Oxygen Content: 0.036 Alcohol B lend RVP Waiver: Yes

Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All)

------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ VMT Distribution: 0.2697 0.4367 0.1632 0.0361 0.0002 0.0024 0.0866 0.0051 1.0000

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.401 0.431 0.523 0.456 0.439 0.071 0.150 0.311 2.22 0.436 Composite CO : 9.45 9.73 10.46 9.93 9.83 0.738 0.426 0.572 16.22 8.991 Composite NOX : 0.271 0.378 0.506 0.413 0.589 0.066 0.188 1.946 1.41 0.518

------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL

------ ------ ------ VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): Composite VOC : 0.939 0.275 0.449 Composite CO : 17.83 0.806 1.044 Composite NOX : 2.152 2.876 4.709

--------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 64Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 65 

# APPENDIX D

Air Quality Impact Summary for the OKI Portion of t he Nonattainment Area and Emissions by State/CountyMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 66

2005 Output Report (R7803)

DAILY AIR QUALITY IMPACT FOR OK I REGION SUMMARY 10-OCT-08

County or Network Network Vehicle VOC CO NOX PM Summer Township Road Miles Lane Miles Miles (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) VMT

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Boone County 233.66 613.11 3900873. 4.304 46.921 10.214 0.176 4162762. Butler County 580.75 1441.60 7421978. 9.898 102.823 18.802 0.332 7774168. Campbell County 198.42 509.82 2276611. 2.511 27.384 5.958 0.103 2428092. Clermont County 427.95 983.82 5051723. 6.824 69.986 12.963 0.226 5359970. Dearborn County 147.07 348.94 1323712. 2.360 20.456 3.399 0.060 1412377. Hamilton County 1061.67 3076.64 21783578. 29.404 301.786 55.854 0.975 23094892. Kenton County 239.03 592.36 3908394. 4.304 47.012 10.214 0.176 4162693. Warren County 397.32 979.42 5853879. 7.935 81.099 15.074 0.262 6232673. Montgomery Cnty 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Greene County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Miami County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Clark County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Preble County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Clinton County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Lawrenceburg Twp 25.15 69.78 575202. 0.997 8.889 1.435 0.026 596322.

State

=================================================== =================================================== ============== IN Not AQ Region 147.07 348.94 1323712. 2.360 20.456 3.399 0.060 1412377. KY - OKI Only 671.11 1715.29 10085878. 11.119 121.317 26.386 0.455 10753546. OH - OKI Only 2467.69 6481.48 40111160. 54.061 555.693 102.692 1.795 42461700. OH - MVRPC Only 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. OH - Other 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. IN NonAttainment 25.15 69.78 575202. 0.997 8.889 1.435 0.026 596322.

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Region 3311.01 8615.49 52095952. 68.536 706.355 133.912 2.335 55223952. OKI OH+IN AQ Reg 2492.84 6551.26 40686360. 55.057 564.582 104.127 1.821 43058024.

Intra-Zonal VMT

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Boone County 23244. 0.024 0.280 0.057 0.001 Butler County 30308. 0.039 0.420 0.073 0.001 Campbell County 9606. 0.010 0.116 0.024 0.000 Clermont County 31608. 0.040 0.438 0.076 0.001 Dearborn County 16428. 0.027 0.254 0.040 0.001 Hamilton County 46049. 0.059 0.638 0.111 0.002 Kenton County 11183. 0.012 0.135 0.027 0.001 Warren County 30337. 0.039 0.420 0.073 0.001 Montgomery Cnty 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Greene County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Miami County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Clark County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Preble County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Clinton County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Lawrenceburg Twp 3439. 0.004 0.048 0.008 0.000

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Total Intra-Zonal 202202. 0.253 2.747 0.490 0.009 OKI OH+IN AQ Region IZ 141741. 0.180 1.964 0.343 0.006

* Note: VMT reflects yearly average daily VMT. Emis sions for CO are based on yearly average daily VMT. Emissions for VOC and NOX include a factor to represent summer travel.

Transit VMT

=================================================== =================================================== ============== IN Not AQ Region 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 KY - OKI Only 8166. 0.005 0.040 0.148 0.005 OH - OKI Only 29825. 0.009 0.149 0.544 0.019 OH - MVRPC Only 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 OH - Other 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 IN NonAttainment 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Total Transit 37992. 0.014 0.190 0.692 0.024 OKI OH+IN AQ Region 29825. 0.009 0.149 0.544 0.019

=================================================== =================================================== ==============

Grand Totals

=================================================== =================================================== ============== IN Not AQ Region 1340140. 2.388 20.710 3.438 0.060 KY - OKI Only 10138077. 11.170 121.887 26.643 0.462 OH - OKI Only 40279288. 54.246 557.758 103.571 1.820 OH - MVRPC Only 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 OH - Other 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 IN NonAttainment 578641. 1.001 8.936 1.443 0.026

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Grand Total 52133944. 68.550 706.544 134.604 2.360 OKI OH+IN AQ Region 40857928. 55.247 566.695 105.014 1.846

=================================================== =================================================== ==============

=================================================== =================================================== ============== * Note: VMT reflects yearly average daily VMT. Emis sions for CO are based on yearly average daily VMT. Emissions for VOC and NOX include a factor to represent summer travel.Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 67

2008 Output Report (R7803)

DAILY AIR QUALITY IMPACT FOR OK I REGION SUMMARY 30-SEP-09

County or Network Network Vehicle VOC CO NOX PM Summer Township Road Miles Lane Miles Miles (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) VMT

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Boone County 236.45 639.31 4051620. 3.981 44.192 8.478 0.138 4330563. Butler County 567.07 1473.35 7714861. 7.842 84.234 15.988 0.260 8102730. Campbell County 191.02 506.98 2329601. 2.285 25.410 4.865 0.079 2485233. Clermont County 416.74 972.04 5230069. 5.388 57.104 10.985 0.176 5567110. Dearborn County 144.53 342.91 1334278. 1.749 15.804 2.655 0.045 1423366. Hamilton County 1019.54 3042.53 22044516. 22.649 240.691 46.174 0.744 23401434. Kenton County 223.19 587.32 3904860. 3.838 42.592 8.173 0.133 4174555. Warren County 387.13 987.90 6025856. 6.226 65.793 12.693 0.203 6432735. Montgomery Cnty 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Greene County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Miami County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Clark County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Preble County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Clinton County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Lawrenceburg Twp 24.16 68.73 584186. 0.749 6.919 1.137 0.020 609631.

State

=================================================== =================================================== ============== IN Not AQ Region 144.53 342.91 1334278. 1.749 15.804 2.655 0.045 1423366. KY - OKI Only 650.65 1733.61 10286081. 10.104 112.194 21.516 0.349 10990352. OH - OKI Only 2390.48 6475.82 41015308. 42.104 447.821 85.839 1.383 43504008. OH - MVRPC Only 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. OH - Other 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. IN NonAttainment 24.16 68.73 584186. 0.749 6.919 1.137 0.020 609631.

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Region 3209.81 8621.07 53219848. 54.707 582.738 111.147 1.798 56527368. OKI OH+IN AQ Reg 2414.64 6544.55 41599492. 42.854 454.740 86.976 1.403 44113640.

Intra-Zonal VMT

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Boone County 24964. 0.023 0.272 0.049 0.001 Butler County 30824. 0.030 0.337 0.061 0.001 Campbell County 9941. 0.009 0.108 0.019 0.000 Clermont County 32420. 0.031 0.354 0.064 0.001 Dearborn County 16853. 0.021 0.200 0.031 0.001 Hamilton County 46026. 0.045 0.503 0.091 0.002 Kenton County 11097. 0.010 0.121 0.022 0.000 Warren County 31482. 0.030 0.344 0.062 0.001 Montgomery Cnty 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Greene County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Miami County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Clark County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Preble County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Clinton County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Lawrenceburg Twp 3396. 0.003 0.037 0.007 0.000

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Total Intra-Zonal 207003. 0.203 2.275 0.406 0.007 OKI OH+IN AQ Region IZ 144148. 0.140 1.574 0.284 0.005

* Note: VMT reflects yearly average daily VMT. Emis sions for CO are based on yearly average daily VMT. Emissions for VOC and NOX include a factor to represent summer travel.

Transit VMT

=================================================== =================================================== ============== IN Not AQ Region 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 KY - OKI Only 11375. 0.005 0.045 0.176 0.004 OH - OKI Only 33961. 0.007 0.141 0.531 0.011 OH - MVRPC Only 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 OH - Other 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 IN NonAttainment 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Total Transit 45336. 0.011 0.186 0.708 0.014 OKI OH+IN AQ Region 33961. 0.007 0.141 0.531 0.011

=================================================== =================================================== ==============

Grand Totals

=================================================== =================================================== ============== IN Not AQ Region 1351131. 1.770 16.003 2.686 0.046 KY - OKI Only 10343458. 10.151 112.741 21.782 0.354 OH - OKI Only 41190020. 42.247 449.499 86.648 1.399 OH - MVRPC Only 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 OH - Other 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 IN NonAttainment 587582. 0.753 6.956 1.144 0.020

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Grand Total 53265184. 54.718 582.924 111.855 1.812 OKI OH+IN AQ Region 41777604. 43.000 456.455 87.792 1.419

=================================================== =================================================== ==============

=================================================== =================================================== ============== * Note: VMT reflects yearly average daily VMT. Emis sions for CO are based on yearly average daily VMT. Emissions for VOC and NOX include a factor to represent summer travel.Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 68

2015 Output Report (R7803)

DAILY AIR QUALITY IMPACT FOR OK I REGION SUMMARY 15-SEP-09

County or Network Network Vehicle VOC CO NOX PM Summer Township Road Miles Lane Miles Miles (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) VMT

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Boone County 243.53 743.15 4798837. 3.152 37.193 4.609 0.092 5105800. Butler County 586.21 1539.89 8425674. 4.851 64.243 7.520 0.160 8836953. Campbell County 197.16 550.67 2620037. 1.728 20.306 2.527 0.050 2798785. Clermont County 424.04 989.87 5618901. 3.272 42.842 5.072 0.107 5960298. Dearborn County 152.37 367.83 1488387. 1.177 12.543 1.408 0.028 1588928. Hamilton County 1041.80 3193.63 23005940. 13.411 175.413 20.789 0.436 24429772. Kenton County 232.28 631.62 4330736. 2.841 33.565 4.154 0.083 4601830. Warren County 393.28 1024.31 6849283. 4.000 52.224 6.201 0.130 7286355. Montgomery Cnty 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Greene County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Miami County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Clark County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Preble County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Clinton County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Lawrenceburg Twp 24.82 70.88 644037. 0.496 5.427 0.594 0.012 670198.

State

=================================================== =================================================== ============== IN Not AQ Region 152.37 367.83 1488387. 1.177 12.543 1.408 0.028 1588928. KY - OKI Only 672.96 1925.44 11749610. 7.720 91.063 11.291 0.224 12506415. OH - OKI Only 2445.33 6747.70 43899792. 25.534 334.722 39.582 0.832 46513372. OH - MVRPC Only 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. OH - Other 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. IN NonAttainment 24.82 70.88 644037. 0.496 5.427 0.594 0.012 670198.

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Region 3295.48 9111.85 57781832. 34.927 443.756 52.875 1.097 61278912. OKI OH+IN AQ Reg 2470.15 6818.58 44543828. 26.030 340.149 40.176 0.845 47183568.

Intra-Zonal VMT

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Boone County 27656. 0.017 0.214 0.025 0.001 Butler County 32853. 0.018 0.250 0.028 0.001 Campbell County 11141. 0.007 0.086 0.010 0.000 Clermont County 35240. 0.019 0.269 0.030 0.001 Dearborn County 18309. 0.014 0.154 0.016 0.000 Hamilton County 46800. 0.026 0.357 0.040 0.001 Kenton County 12048. 0.007 0.093 0.011 0.000 Warren County 37749. 0.021 0.288 0.032 0.001 Montgomery Cnty 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Greene County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Miami County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Clark County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Preble County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Clinton County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Lawrenceburg Twp 3434. 0.002 0.026 0.003 0.000

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Total Intra-Zonal 225230. 0.131 1.738 0.195 0.004 OKI OH+IN AQ Region IZ 156076. 0.086 1.190 0.133 0.003

* Note: VMT reflects yearly average daily VMT. Emis sions for CO are based on yearly average daily VMT. Emissions for VOC and NOX include a factor to represent summer travel.

Transit VMT

=================================================== =================================================== ============== IN Not AQ Region 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 KY - OKI Only 9160. 0.003 0.019 0.067 0.001 OH - OKI Only 39966. 0.006 0.075 0.285 0.004 OH - MVRPC Only 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 OH - Other 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 IN NonAttainment 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Total Transit 49127. 0.009 0.094 0.352 0.005 OKI OH+IN AQ Region 39966. 0.006 0.075 0.285 0.004

=================================================== =================================================== ==============

Grand Totals

=================================================== =================================================== ============== IN Not AQ Region 1506696. 1.191 12.697 1.424 0.029 KY - OKI Only 11809615. 7.755 91.476 11.404 0.226 OH - OKI Only 44092400. 25.623 335.960 39.997 0.839 OH - MVRPC Only 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 OH - Other 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 IN NonAttainment 647471. 0.498 5.454 0.597 0.012

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Grand Total 57830960. 34.936 443.849 53.227 1.102 OKI OH+IN AQ Region 44739872. 26.122 341.414 40.594 0.852

=================================================== =================================================== ==============

=================================================== =================================================== ============== * Note: VMT reflects yearly average daily VMT. Emis sions for CO are based on yearly average daily VMT. Emissions for VOC and NOX include a factor to represent summer travel.Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 69

2020 Output Report (R7803)

DAILY AIR QUALITY IMPACT FOR OK I REGION SUMMARY 16-SEP-09

County or Network Network Vehicle VOC CO NOX PM Summer Township Road Miles Lane Miles Miles (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) VMT

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Boone County 243.53 743.15 5412408. 2.945 37.981 3.434 0.085 5757894. Butler County 586.21 1539.89 9042376. 4.486 63.991 5.354 0.143 9485722. Campbell County 197.16 550.67 2833751. 1.548 19.885 1.805 0.045 3027410. Clermont County 424.04 989.87 6030235. 3.025 42.675 3.611 0.095 6397591. Dearborn County 152.37 367.83 1640862. 1.026 12.473 1.031 0.026 1752277. Hamilton County 1041.80 3193.63 23837298. 11.974 168.692 14.290 0.376 25320182. Kenton County 232.28 631.62 4683779. 2.545 32.868 2.967 0.074 4976098. Warren County 393.28 1024.31 7672745. 3.862 54.299 4.609 0.121 8165845. Montgomery Cnty 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Greene County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Miami County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Clark County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Preble County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Clinton County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. Lawrenceburg Twp 24.82 70.88 683890. 0.417 5.199 0.419 0.011 712313.

State

=================================================== =================================================== ============== IN Not AQ Region 152.37 367.83 1640862. 1.026 12.473 1.031 0.026 1752277. KY - OKI Only 672.96 1925.44 12929937. 7.039 90.733 8.207 0.204 13761400. OH - OKI Only 2445.33 6747.70 46582656. 23.346 329.658 27.863 0.734 49369340. OH - MVRPC Only 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. OH - Other 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. IN NonAttainment 24.82 70.88 683890. 0.417 5.199 0.419 0.011 712313.

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Region 3295.48 9111.85 61837348. 31.827 438.063 37.521 0.975 65595328. OKI OH+IN AQ Reg 2470.15 6818.58 47266544. 23.763 334.856 28.283 0.745 50081652.

Intra-Zonal VMT

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Boone County 32337. 0.017 0.227 0.019 0.001 Butler County 35277. 0.017 0.250 0.020 0.001 Campbell County 11864. 0.006 0.083 0.007 0.000 Clermont County 36963. 0.017 0.262 0.021 0.001 Dearborn County 19281. 0.011 0.147 0.011 0.000 Hamilton County 47824. 0.023 0.338 0.027 0.001 Kenton County 12926. 0.007 0.091 0.008 0.000 Warren County 43391. 0.021 0.307 0.024 0.001 Montgomery Cnty 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Greene County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Miami County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Clark County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Preble County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Clinton County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Lawrenceburg Twp 3610. 0.002 0.026 0.002 0.000

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Total Intra-Zonal 243473. 0.120 1.730 0.140 0.004 OKI OH+IN AQ Region IZ 167065. 0.079 1.182 0.094 0.003

* Note: VMT reflects yearly average daily VMT. Emis sions for CO are based on yearly average daily VMT. Emissions for VOC and NOX include a factor to represent summer travel.

Transit VMT

=================================================== =================================================== ============== IN Not AQ Region 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 KY - OKI Only 9160. 0.003 0.009 0.030 0.000 OH - OKI Only 39966. 0.006 0.036 0.127 0.002 OH - MVRPC Only 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 OH - Other 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 IN NonAttainment 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Total Transit 49127. 0.009 0.045 0.157 0.003 OKI OH+IN AQ Region 39966. 0.006 0.036 0.127 0.002

=================================================== =================================================== ==============

Grand Totals

=================================================== =================================================== ============== IN Not AQ Region 1660143. 1.037 12.620 1.043 0.026 KY - OKI Only 12996224. 7.071 91.144 8.271 0.205 OH - OKI Only 46786076. 23.429 330.850 28.082 0.739 OH - MVRPC Only 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 OH - Other 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 IN NonAttainment 687500. 0.419 5.224 0.421 0.011

=================================================== =================================================== ============== Grand Total 61886476. 31.836 438.107 37.677 0.977 OKI OH+IN AQ Region 47473576. 23.848 336.074 28.504 0.750

=================================================== =================================================== ==============

=================================================== =================================================== ============== * Note: VMT reflects yearly average daily VMT. Emis sions for CO are based on yearly average daily VMT. Emissions for VOC and NOX include a factor to represent summer travel.Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 70Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 71 Appendix E Clinton County Air Quality Analyis (provided by ODO T)

Clinton County OZONE YEAR 2005

VOC NOX FUNCTIONAL HPMS ANNUAL 2005 POLLUTANT 2005 POLLUTANT
CLASSIFICATION 2005 GROWTH 2005 VOC EF BURDEN NOX E F BURDEN VMT FACTOR VMT GM/MI TONS/DAY GM/MI TONS/DAY

RURAL 0 1 INTERSTATE 554,300 1.000 554,300 1.418 0.865 3.15 6 1.924 0 2 PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 0 1.000 0 1.461 0.000 2.452 0.000 0 6 MINOR ARTERIAL 322,000 1.000 322,000 1.461 0.517 2.452 0.868 0 7 MAJOR ARTERIAL 339,140 1.000 339,140 1.552 0.579 2.223 0.829 0 8 MINOR COLLECTOR 5,400 1.000 5,400 1.552 0.009 2.223 0.013 0 9 LOCAL 393,470 1.000 393,470 1.552 0.672 2.223 0.9 62

URBAN 1 1 INTERSTATE 0 1.000 0 1.418 0.000 3.156 0.000 1 2 FREEWAY/EXPRE SSWAY 0 1.000 0 1.418 0.000 3.156 0.000 1 4 PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 140,870 1.000 140,870 1.753 0.272 2.174 0. 337 1 6 MINOR ARTERIAL 21,980 1.000 21,980 1.753 0.042 2. 174 0.053 1 7 COLLECTOR 23,940 1.000 23,940 1.753 0.046 2.175 0 .057 1 9 LOCAL 8,500 1.000 8,500 1.753 0.016 2.269 0.021

2005 TOTAL 1,809,6 00 1,809,6 00 3.019 5.065Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 72 Clinton County OZONE YEAR 2008

VOC NOX FUNCTIONAL HPMS ANNUAL 2008 POLLUTANT 2008 POLLUTANT CLASSIFICATION 2008 GROWTH 2008 VOC EF BURDEN NOX E F BURDEN
VMT FACTOR VMT GM/MI TONS/DAY GM/MI TONS/DAY

RURAL 0 1 INTERSTATE 553,330 1.000 553,330 1.108 0.674 2.41 4 1.469 0 2 PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 0 1.000 0 1.139 0.000 1.899 0.000 0 6 MINOR ARTERIAL 314,550 1.000 314,550 1.139 0.394 1.899 0.657 0 7 MAJOR ARTERIAL 360,620 1.000 360,620 1.204 0.478 1.721 0.683 0 8 MINOR COLLECTOR 5,200 1.000 5,200 1.204 0.007 1.721 0.010 0 9 LOCAL 369,170 1.000 369,170 1.204 0.489 1.721 0.6 99

URBAN 1 1 INTERSTATE 0 1.000 0 1.108 0.000 2.414 0.000 1 2 FREEWAY/EXPRE SSWAY 0 1.000 0 1.108 0.000 2.414 0.000 1 4 PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 134,360 1.000 134,360 1.349 0.199 1.682 0. 249 1 6 MINOR ARTERIAL 22,620 1.000 22,620 1.349 0.034 1. 682 0.042 1 7 COLLECTOR 25,240 1.000 25,240 1.350 0.037 1.684 0 .047 1 9 LOCAL 8,490 1.000 8,490 1.450 0.014 1.757 0.016

2005 TOTAL 1,793,5 80 1,793,5 80 2.326 3.871Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 73 Clinton County OZONE YEAR 2015

VOC NOX FUNCTIONAL HPMS ANNUAL 2015 POLLUTANT 2015 POLLUTANT
CLASSIFICATION 2008 GROWTH 2015 VOC EF BURDEN NOX E F BURDEN VMT FACTOR VMT GM/MI TONS/DAY GM/MI TONS/DAY

RURAL 0 1 INTERSTATE 553,330 1.014 607,786 0.622 0.416 1.07 2 0.717 0 2 PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL* 0 1.013 104,288 0.632 0.073 0.873 0.100 0 6 MINOR ARTERIAL 314,550 1.008 331,901 0.632 0.231 0.873 0.319 0 7 MAJOR ARTERIAL 360,620 1.014 396,110 0.662 0.288 0.799 0.348 0 8 MINOR COLLECTOR 5,200 1.009 5,540 0.662 0.004 0.799 0.005 0 9 LOCAL 369,170 1.012 401,319 0.662 0.292 0.799 0.3 53

URBAN 1 1 INTERSTATE 0 0.000 0 0.622 0.000 1.072 0.000 1 2 FREEWAY/EXPRE SSWAY 0 0.000 0 0.622 0.000 1.072 0.000 1 4 PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 134,360 1.008 142,462 0.735 0.115 0.784 0. 123 1 6 MINOR ARTERIAL 22,620 1.010 24,201 0.735 0.020 0. 784 0.021 1 7 COLLECTOR 25,240 1.009 26,874 0.735 0.022 0.785 0 .023 1 9 LOCAL 8,490 1.009 9,014 0.789 0.008 0.819 0.008

2005 TOTAL 1,793,5 80 2,049,4 96 1.468 2.016Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 74 Clinton County OZONE YEAR 2020

VOC NOX FUNCTIONAL HPMS ANNUAL 2020 POLLUTANT 2020 POLLUTANT
CLASSIFICATION 2008 GROWTH 2020 VOC EF BURDEN NOX E F BURDEN VMT FACTOR VMT GM/MI TONS/DAY GM/MI TONS/DAY

RURAL 0 1 INTERSTATE 553,330 1.014 649,934 0.486 0.347 0.68 7 0.491 0 2 PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL* 0 1.013 111,269 0.493 0.060 0.578 0.071 0 6 MINOR ARTERIAL 314,550 1.008 344,877 0.493 0.187 0.578 0.219 0 7 MAJOR ARTERIAL 360,620 1.014 423,579 0.517 0.241 0.535 0.249 0 8 MINOR COLLECTOR 5,200 1.009 5,797 0.517 0.003 0.535 0.003 0 9 LOCAL 369,170 1.012 425,983 0.517 0.242 0.535 0.2 51

URBAN 1 1 INTERSTATE 0 0.000 0 0.486 0.000 0.687 0.000 1 2 FREEWAY/EXPRE SSWAY 0 0.000 0 0.486 0.000 0.687 0.000 1 4 PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 134,360 1.008 148,547 0.577 0.094 0.527 0. 086 1 6 MINOR ARTERIAL 22,620 1.010 25,398 0.577 0.016 0. 527 0.015 1 7 COLLECTOR 25,240 1.009 28,105 0.578 0.018 0.528 0 .016 1 9 LOCAL 8,490 1.009 9,409 0.622 0.006 0.551 0.006

2005 TOTAL 1,793,5 80 2,172,8 99 1.216 1.407

*VMT due to new facilities estimated with the Ohio Statewide Travel Demand ModelMobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnat i 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area , October 2009 

### 75

# APPENDIX G

Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) – Area Source Inventory Standard Operating Procedure

### This page left intentionally blank.

### Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

# Standard Operating Procedure

Office: Office of Air Quality Branch: Air Programs Branch Section: Technical Support and Modeling Section

Revised: 02/27/2008 Revision Cycle: 2 years Effective date: 02/15/07

Scope of operations This SOP is to identify source categories and develop emissions not calculated in point source inventories. This data is compiled ev ery three years as mandated by EPA.

Scope of applicability This SOP is for the Senior Environmental Manager and the Environmental Manager in the Emissions Group.



### Authorized Signatures I approve and authorize this Standard Operating Procedure:Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1



### Table of Contents Scope of operations ....................................................................................................................................1 Scope of applicability .................................................................................................................................1 Authorized Signatures

............................................................................................................................... .1 1. Overview work flow chart .......................................................................................................................3 2. Definitions ................................................................................................................................................3 3. Roles .........................................................................................................................................................4 Responsibilities: .........................................................................................................................................4 4. Description of equipment, forms, and/or software to be used ...........................................................4 5. Procedure ................................................................................................................................................4 5.1 Procedural Flowchart ....................................................................................................................4 5.2 Procedure .......................................................................................................................................5 6. Standards and checklists .....................................................................................................................24 7. Records Management ...........................................................................................................................24 8. Quality Assurance / Quality Control ...................................................................................................25 9. Continuous Improvement Cycle ..........................................................................................................25 10. References

............................................................................................................................... ............25 11. History of Revisions ...........................................................................................................................25 12. Appendices

............................................................................................................................... ...........25

2Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1



### 1. Overview work flow chart The process described is not part of a larger syst em and does not need an Overview work flow chart.



### 2. Definitions

AP-42 – Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors AP- 42, Fifth Edition, Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sources (January 1995) plus Supplements A – F (Updates 2001 – 2004). AP-42 can be obtained at www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/

.

Area Sources

- A collection of similar emission units within a geographic area that collectively represent individual sources that are small and numerous and ha ve not been inventoried as a specific point, mobile, or biogenic source.

Authorized - Established by official authority and usage; as with a policy, standard operating procedure (SOP), or quality assurance project pl an (QAPP) that is signed and dated.

EIIP (Emission Inventory Improvement Program) - The EIIP is an EPA program established in 1993 to promote the development and use of standard procedures for collecting, calculati ng, storing, reporting, and sharing air emissions date.

Emission Factors - An emission factor is the estimate of the quantity of pollutant released to the atmosphere (because of some operation or activity such as combustion or industrial production) divided by the level of that activity.

Process

- The term “process” used when describing area sources is used to name an operation or activity that produces emissions.

NEI - National Emission Inventory Air Pollutant Emission Trends, U.S. EPA.

Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code

- A Standard Industrial Classification code from the series of codes devised by the United States O ffice of Management and Budget (OMB) to classify establishments according to the type of economic activity in which they engage.

Source Classification Code (SCC)

- Source Classification Code is a process-level code that describes the equipment or operation emitting pollutants.

3Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1



### 3. Roles

Title # of Staff Experience Qualifications Location

Senior Environmental Manager 1 N/A MS ACCESS, Emission Inventories and familiarity with the EIIP Air Programs Branch

Environmental Manager 1 N/A MS ACCESS, Emission Inventories and familiarity with the EIIP Air Programs Branch

Responsibilities:

Senior Environmental Manager Oversees work of the Environmental Manager and ensures that all goals are met. The Senior Environmental Manager also does the final upload to the NEI.

Environmental Manager The Environmental Manager calculates the Area Source Emissions using the EIIP or other EPA guidance as provided. The Environmental Manager is also responsible for updating the SOP for the Emissions Group.



### 4. Description of equipment, forms, and/or software to be used

Equipment, Form, &/or Software Who uses it? Location

AP42 Senior Environmental Manager and Environmental Manager EPA’s website: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/index. html
Emission Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP) Senior Environmental Manager and Environmental Manager EPA’s website: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techrep ort/

National Emission Inventory (NEI) Air Pollutant Emission Trends, U.S. EPA Senior Environmental Manager and Environmental Manager EPA’s website http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/trends/



### 5. Procedure

5.1 Procedural Flowchart The procedural flowchart below titled “Area Source Inventory” is us ed to calculate non-point source inventories. This data is compiled every three years as mandated by EPA. The guidance followed is located in the EIIP. Emissions from area source s are calculated at the county level and consist of individual sources that are small, numerous and that have not been inventoried as specific point, mobile, or biogenic sources according to the EIIP.

YES

NO Identify Categories Is the categor y an Area Source?

Then calculate emissions using the SOP for Receiving Emission Statements or the SOP

for On-Road Mobile Source Inventory Calculate Area Source categories using the EIIP or other EPA guidance as provided Enter data into NEI

4Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1

5.2 Procedure 

### Category 1: Stationary Fuel Combustion

Sub-Category 1.1: Industrial Fuel Combustion

SCC: 2102002000, 210200400, 2102005000, 2102006000, 2102007000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from industrial fuel combustion:

1. Obtain statewide fuel consumption for “Other Indu strial” for the following f uels: coal, distillate oil, natural gas, and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). Us e the Energy Information Administration’s website at http://www.eia.doe.gov/ to find fuel consumption.

Note: As of the date of this SOP, the followin g steps will lead to data for fuel consumption.

a. Go to http://www.eia.doe.gov/ b. Click on link for the various types of fuel consumption c. Click on consumption tab for state totals

2. To avoid double calculating the various fuel comb ustions, subtract reported source totals from the total statewide fuel consumption by querying the to tal process rates for the various SCC codes using the ACCESS data tables at K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stp tl_02.mdb. The remaining number is the area source fuel consumpt ion for the state.

3. To distribute the remaining fuel to the county leve l, calculate the ratio of county to state employment for the manufacturing sector by dividing the numbe r of Manufacturing Employees for each county by the number of manufacturing employees statewide. Use the County Business Patterns website at http://www.census.gov/ to find the number of manufacturing employees for each county.

Note: As of the date of this SOP, the followin g steps will lead to data for Economic Census.

a. Go to http://www.census.gov/ b. Click on Economic Census c. Under 2002 Reports by State, use the down arrow key to select Indiana d. Now, select each of the counties to find the county manufacturing employees e. Use the total of employees for manuf acturing under the paid employees’ column

4. Multiply the ratio calculated above in step 3 by t he area source fuel consumpt ion to distribute the fuel to the county level. The remaining number is the pr ocess rate for each county. Multiply the process rate by the appropriate EPA emission factors for t he various fuels for industrial manufacturing found in AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume 1, Chap ter 1, External Combustion Sources at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/

. Sub-Category 1.2: Commercial/ Institutional Fuel Combustion

SCC: 2103004000, 2103005000, 2103006000, 2103007000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions fr om commercial/institutional fuel combustion:

1. Obtain statewide fuel consumption for “Commercial” for the following fuels: distillate fuel oil, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), natural gas, and residual fuel oil. Use the Energy Information Administration’s website at http://www.eia.doe.gov/ to find fuel consumption.

Note: Use the steps in sub-category 1.1-1 to navigate through the Energy Information Administration’s website.

5Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1
2. To avoid double calculating the various fuel comb ustions, subtract reported source totals from the total statewide fuel consumption by querying the to tal process rates for the various fuels using the SIC codes greater than 49 99 using the ACCESS data tables at K :\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb. These are the SIC codes that identify all t he commercial/institutional area sources.

3. To distribute the remaining fuel to the county leve l, calculate the ratio of county to state employment for the commercial/institutional sector by dividi ng the number of commercial/ institutional employees for each county by the number of commercial/instit utional employees statewide. Use the County Business Patterns website at http://www.census.gov/ to find the number of commercial/institutional employees for each county.

Note: Use the steps in sub-category 1.1-3 to navi gate through the U.S. Census Bureau’s website.

4. Multiply the ratio calculated above in step 3 by t he area source fuel consumpt ion to distribute the fuel to the county level. The remaining number is the process rate for each county. Multiply the process rate by the appropriate EPA emission factors for t he various fuels for commercial/institutional found in AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 1, External Combustion Sources at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/

.

Sub-Category 1.3: Residential Fuel Combustion

SCC: 2104002000, 2104004000, 2104006000, 2104007000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from residential fuel combustion:

1. Obtain statewide fuel consumpti on for “Residential” for the following fuels: coal, distillate oil, natural gas, and liquid petroleum gas. Use the Ener gy Information Administration’s website at http://www.eia.doe.gov/ to find fuel consumption.

Note: Use the steps in sub-category 1.1-1 to navigate through the Energy Information Administration’s website.

2. To distribute residential fuel to the county level, calculate the ratio of county fuel usage to statewide fuel usage using the breakdown of fuels by house hold per county divided by the breakdown of fuels by household per state using the U.S. Census Bureau’s website at http://www.census.gov/

. Note: As of the date of this SOP, the following steps will lead to data for breakdown of fuels by household.

a. Go to http://www.census.gov/ b. On the left hand side click on “American Fact Finder” c. Using the drop down menu, click on Indiana d. Scroll to “Housing Characterist ics” and select “show more” e. On the left hand side, select “chan ge geography (state, county, place...)” f. Using the drop down menu, select county, state, and each county name to obtain housing

information

3. Multiply the ratio calculated abov e in step 3 by the area residential f uel use by state to distribute the fuel to the county level. The remaining number is the process rate for each county for the various fuels. Multiply the process rate by the approp riate EPA emission factors fo r the various fuels for residential found in AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 1 External Combustion Sources at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/

.

6Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1
Sub-Category 1.4: Residential Heating Using Wood

SCC: 2104008001, 2104008002, 2104008003, 2104008004, 2104008010, 2104008030, 2104008050

Follow these steps when calculating emission s from residential heating using wood:

1. Obtain statewide wood consumption for “Residential” using the Energy Information Administration’s website at http://www.eia.doe.gov/ . To convert the statewide wood consumption from cords of wood consumed to tons, multiply the total cords consumed by 1.25.

Note: As of the date of this SOP, the followin g steps will lead to data for wood consumption.

a. Go to http://www.eia.doe.gov/ b. Click on Households, Buildings & Industry c. Under Consumption Summaries, click on “Annual” d. Now, over to the right click on “State Energy” e. Using the drop down menu at the bottom, select “Indiana” f. Under “Consumption” click on the “Residential” document

2. Using the ratio estimates provided by EPA found in the “Documentation For The Final 2002 NONPOINT SECTOR (FEB 06 version) NATION AL EMISSIONS INVENTORY FOR CRITERIA AND HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS” at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/ 2002inventory.html#documentaiton the number calculated above in step 1 is broken out into three categories (fireplac e without inserts, fireplaces with inserts and woodstoves).

3. To distribute to the county level for the three ca tegories above, calculate a ratio of county to state using the statewide total of households and the count y total of households that burn wood found at the U.S. Census Bureau website http://www.census.gov/ . The remaining number is the process rate for each county. Multiply the pr ocess rate by the appropriate EPA em ission factors fo r each of the categories using the EIIP, Volume 3, Ch apter 2, Residential Wood Combustion at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii02_apr2001.pdf

. Note: Use the steps in sub-category 1.3-2 to navigate through the Energy Information Administration’s website.


### Category 2: Industrial Processes

Sub-Category 2.1: Bakeries

SCC: 2302050000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from bakeries:

1. Calculate a per capita consumption factor using the reported weight of yeast–raised product reported under the Bread, Cake, and Frozen Bakery Products from the Economic Census Bureau at http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/ and the U.S. population at the U.S. Census Bureau at http://census,gov/

. Note: As of the date of this SOP, the following steps will lead to data for yeast-raised product.

a. Go to http://www.census.gov b. Under Business & Industry open “Economic Census” c. Now open “Subject Series” d. Under Manufacturing, open the table “Product Summary” e. Use the yeast – raised product under Commercial Bakeries (NAICS code 311812) and Frozen cakes, pies, and other pastries manufacturing (NAICS code 311813)

7Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1

2. Multiply the per capita consumption factor ca lculated above in step 1 by the Indiana population found at the U.S. Census Bureau at http://www.census.gov

. Note: As of the date of this SOP, the foll owing steps will lead to Indiana population data.

a. Go to http://www.census.gov b. Under Population Finder, use the drop down menu to select Indiana

3. To avoid double calculating the amount consumed for the state, subtract the reported process rate for both the straight-dough and sponge-dough by queryi ng the total process rates for the SCC 30203202 (straight-dough) and SCC 30203201 (sponge-do ugh) using the ACC ESS data tables at K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb.

4. Multiply the remaining process rate by the strai ght-dough emission factor of .5 lbs VOC/1,000 pounds baked found in the EIIP, Volume 3, Area Source Me thod Abstracts: Baked Goods at Commercial/Retail Bakeries at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/index.html

. 5. Calculate a per capita factor by dividing the I ndiana population found in step 2 by the remaining process rate. Now multiply the per capita factor by each of the county populations to calculate the VOC emissions for each county.

Note: As of the date of this SOP, the fo llowing steps will lead to county population data.

a. Go to http://www.census.gov b. Under Population Finder, use the drop down menu to select Indiana c. Under “View more results”, select the county table



### Category 3: Solvent Utilization

Sub-Category 3.1: Architectural Coatings

SCC: 2401001000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from architectural coatings:

1. Calculate an emission factor for architectural coating area sources first by adding all the solventbased paints together and all the water based paint s together using the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov . Use Table 1 to select all solvent-based paints and Table 2 to select all water based paints.

Table 1 National Solvent Coating Sales Solvent Type 1,000 gallons Exterior Solvent Type XX Interior Solvent Type XX Architectural Lacquers XX

Architectural Coating N.S.K. XX Total Solvents XX

Table 2 National Water Based Coating Sales Water Type 1,000 gallons Exterior Water Type XX Interior Water Type XX Total Water Type XX

8Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1

Note: As of the date of this SOP, the followin g steps will lead to architectural coating data.

a. Go to http://www.census.gov b. Under Business & Industry, select more c. Now select Current Industrial Reports (CIR) d. Select CIRs by Subject e. Tab down to find the report “Paints and Allied Products”

2. Now multiply the total national number for solvent -based paints by the average solvent-based coating content number (3.87 lbs VOC/gallon) and the total national number for water-based paints by the average water-based coating content number (0. 74 lbs VOC/gal) found in the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 3: Architectural Surface Coating at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/archsfc.pdf

. 3. Add the total solvent-based coatings and the water-based paints together for a total national VOC emission factor from architectural surface coatin g. Then divide this number by the total national population using the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov

. 4. Multiply the number calculated abov e in step 3 by each of the county populations to calculate the total emissions per county.

Note: Use the steps in sub-category 2.1-5 to navigate through the Census Bureau’s website.

Sub-Category 3.2: Automobile Refinishing

SCC: 2401005000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from automobile refinishing:

1. To avoid double calculating, first query the empl oyees from the reported sources using the SIC 7532- Body Repair and Paint Shops using the ACCESS data t ables at K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb. Subtract this number from the coun ty employment for the same SIC using the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov

.
Note: As of the date of this SOP, the foll owing steps will lead to county employment data.

a. Go to http://www.census.gov b. Under Business & Industry, select more c. Now select the County Business Patterns report for county d. Select Indiana e. Select each of the counties to find the number of employees for the corresponding SIC or NAICS code

2. Multiply the emission factor 3, 519 lbs VOC/employee found in the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 13 Auto Body Refinishing at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip /techreport/vol ume03/archsfc.pdf and the county employment found above in step 1 to calcul ate the VOC emissions for each county.

Sub-Category 3.3: Traffic Markings

SCC: 2401008000

Follow these steps when calculating for traffic markings:

1. First calculate the national emissions by finding t he amount of sales for traffic marking paints from the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov and multiply 3.36 lb VOC/gallon the national average VOC content for water and solvent-based paint s from the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 14, Traffic Markings at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii14.pdf

.

9Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1

Note: As of the date of this SOP, the foll owing steps will lead to traffic marking paints.

a. Go to http://www.census.gov b. Under Business & Industry, select more c. Now select Current Industrial Reports (CIR) d. Select CIRs by Subject e. Tab down to find the report “Paints and Allied Products” f. Use the quantity amount in 1000/gallons under “Tra ffic marking paints (all types: shelf goods and

highway department)

2. Allocate the national emissions calculated above in step 1 to the state level by dividing the amount of money spent in Indiana by the money spent nationally on highway maintenance using the category “Total Disbursements” at the Federal Highway Administration’s website http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/po licy/ohim/hs04/htm/sf2.htm

. 3. Calculate the emission factor for Indiana by divi ding the state level emissions by the total number of roadway miles in Indiana, given by contacting the Program Development Division, Highway Statistics, Indiana Department of Transportation or the Office of Air Quality, Technical Support and Modeling Section’s mobile inventory preparer.

4. Multiply the emission factor by the total number of roadway miles in each county using the information supplied from above in step 3.

Sub-Category 3.4: Industrial Surface Coating (employment based emission factor)

SCC: 2401015000, 2401020000, 2401030000, 2401040000, 2401045000, 2401055000, 2401060000, 2401065000, 2401070000, 2401075000, 2401080000

Follow these steps when calculating for industrial surface coating using the employment based emission factor:

1. Calculate an employee based emission factor for t he following SIC’s in the table below running a query to find the point source employment for each of the SIC’s and the reported VOC emissions for each using the ACCESS data tables at K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb.

SCC Description SIC’s

2401015000 Factory Finished Wood 2426-2429,243-245, 2492, 2499

2401020000 Wood Furniture 25

2401030000 Paper Coating 26

2401040000 Metal Cans * 341

2401045000 Metal Coils * 3479

2401055000 Machinery and Equipment 35

2401060000 Appliances * 363

2401065000 Electronic and Other Electrical 3612, 3357

2401070000 New Motor Vehicles ** 3711

2401075000 Other Transportation 37 (not 3711, 373)

2401080000 Marine Coatings 373

10Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1

* Use the National default emission fact or because the reporting sources are low. ** Emissions reported in point source

2. Divide the reported VOC emission s for each of the SIC’s by the re ported employment for each SIC. Use this number for the emission factor.

3. Subtract the number of report ed employees found in step 1 from each of the SIC county totals using the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov . Use the remaining number for the process rate for each of the counties.

Note: Use the steps in sub-category 3.2-1 to navigate through the County Business Patterns.

4. Multiply the process rates above f ound for each of the SIC’s in step 4 by the emission factors found in step 3 to allocate the emissions to each of the counties.

Sub-Category 3.5: Industrial Surface Coating (default emission factor)

SCC: 2401090000, 2401100000, 2401200000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from i ndustrial surface coating using the default emission factor:

1. Calculate industrial surface coat ing emissions using the default emission fa ctor in the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Industrial Surface Coating at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii08.pdf and multiply by the county populations found at the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov

. Note: Use the steps in 2.1-5 to navigate through U.S. Census Bureau’s website.

SCC’s Description Default Emission Factor

24-01-090-000 Miscellaneous Manuf acturing 0.600 lbs VOC/person

24-01-100-000 Industrial Maintena nce Coatings 0.800 lbs VOC/person

24-01-200-000 Other Special Pur pose Coatings 0.800 lbs VOC/person

Sub-Category 3.6: Degreasing

SCC: 2415230000, 2415245000, 2415345000, 2415360000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from degreasing activities:

1. Use the U.S. Census Bureau to find employment numbers for each of the counties for the categories in Table 1 below at http://www.census.gov

. Note: Use the steps in 2.1-5 to navigate through U.S. Census Bureau’s website.

Source Classification Codes and Industries Associated with Degreasing SCC SIC Description
2415230000 36 Electronic and other electronic equipment

25 Furniture and fixtures
33 Primary metal industries
34 Fabricated metal products
35 Industrial machinery and equipment
37 Transportation equipment
38 Instruments and related products

11Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1

39 Miscellaneous manufac turing industries
417 Bus Terminal and Service Facilities
423 Trucking terminal facilities
551 New and used car dealers
552 Used car dealers
554 Gasoline service stations

555 Boat dealers
556 Recreational vehicle dealers 2415245000

753 Automotive repair shops 25 Furniture and fixtures
33 Primary metal industries
34 Fabricated metal products
35 Industrial machinery and equipment
36 Electronic and other electronic equipment
37 Transportation equipment
38 Instruments and related products 2415345000

2415345000 cont. 39 Miscellaneous manufac turing industries 417 Bus Terminal and Service Facilities 423 Trucking terminal facilities 551 New and used car dealers 552 Used car dealers 554 Gasoline service stations 555 Boat dealers 556 Recreational vehicle dealers 2415360000

753 Automotive repair shops

2. Run a query to find reported employment numbers for each of the categories in the table above using the ACCESS data tables at K:\O AQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb.

3. Subtract the reported employment from the U.S Census Bureau’s numbers to find the process rates for each of the counties.

4 Calculate the VOC emissions by mult iplying the default emission factor in the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 6, Solvent Cleaning at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii06fin.pdf and the process rate for each of the counties found in step 3.

Sub-Category 3.7: Dry Cleaners

SCC: 2420010370

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from dry cleaners:

1. Calculate an emission factor by finding the numbe r of employees state wide and county wide for SIC 7216(Laundry and Garment Services) at the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov

. Note: Use the steps in 2.1-5 to navigate through U.S. Census Bureau’s website

2. Take the sum of the employment from the coun ties, multiply by 2000, and divide by the statewide total found in step 1. Use this number for the emission factor.

3. Calculate the process rate by running a query to find the number of reported employees for SIC 7216 using the ACCESS data tables at K:\OAQ_INV\St eptool\Stptl_02.mdb and subtract this number from the county total.

4. Multiply the process rate for each of the counties above by the em ission factor to calculate for VOC emissions.

12Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1
Sub-Category 3.8: Graphic Arts

SCC: 2425000000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from graphic arts activities:

1. Multiply the per capita factor found in the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 7, Graphic Arts at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii07.pdf by the state population from the Census Bureau http://www.census.gov to find the total emissions for the state.

Note: Use the steps in 2.1-2 to navigate th rough the U.S. Census Bureau’s website.

2. Develop an emission factor by subtracting point source emissions from the total emissions and dividing by the state pop ulation found in step 1.

3. Distribute to the counties by multiplying the emission factor by the population for each county.

Note: Use the steps in 2.1-5 to navigate th rough the U.S. Census Bureau’s website.

Sub-Category 3.9: Rubber and Plastics

SCC: 2430000000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from rubber and plastics activities:

1. Run a query to find the total of reported emissi ons and number of reported employees for all SIC’s beginning with 30 using the ACCESS data tabl es at K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb.

2. Calculate the emission factor by dividing the point source emissions by the reported employees.

3. Subtract the reported employment for SIC’s beginning with 30 from total employment for each of the counties.

Note: Use step 3.2-1 to navigate through the County Business Patterns.

4. Multiply the remaining number from above with the emission factor calculated in step 2.

Sub-Category 3.10: Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives

SCC: 2440020000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from industrial adhesives activities:

1. Using the guidance in the Ai r Pollutant Emission Trends at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/trends

, calculate an emission factor by finding the total National Emissions from Industrial Adhesives and divide by the National Manufacturing Employm ent from the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov

. Note: As of the date of this SOP, the following st eps will lead to emission trends data for industrial adhesives.

a. Go to http://www.epa.gov/air /airtrends/aqtrnd03/ b. Select “Appendix A –Data Tables” c. Search for industrial adhesives

Note: As of the date of this SOP, the following steps will lead to National Manufacturing Employment.

a. Go to http://www.census.gov

13Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1

b. Select Economic Census c. Now select “Businesses with paid employees” d. Use the manufacturing number under “paid employees”

2. To avoid double calculating, run a query collecting sources re porting adhesives using the ACCESS data tables at K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb. Subtract the reported employment from the total amount of manufacturing employment. The remaining number is the process rate.

Sub-Category 3.11: Commercial/Consumer Solvents

SCC: 2460100000, 2460200000, 2460400000, 2460500000, 2460600000, 2460800000, 2460900000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from commercial/consumer solvent usage:

1. Using the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 5, Consumer, and Commercial Solvent Use at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii05.pdf , multiply the per capita factors for each of SCC codes by the population for each county from the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov

. Note: Use the steps in 2.1-5 to navigate through the U.S. Census Bureau’s website.

Emission Factors for Commercial/Consumer Solvents

Source Classification Codes Product Category Per Capita Emission Factor (lb VOC/person)

2460100000 Personal Care Products 2.32

2460200000 Household Products 0.79

2460400000 Automotive Aftermarket Products 1.36

2460500000 Coatings and Related Products 0.95

2460600000 Adhesives and Sealants 0.57

2460800000 FIFRA-Regulated Products 1.78

2460900000 Miscellaneous Products 0.07

Sub-Category 3.12: Asphalt Emulsions

SCC: 2461022000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from asphalt emulsions:

1. To calculate the process rate, find the number of barrels of asphalt used for the state found at the State Energy Data website at http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/_seds_updates.html

. 2. Obtain the amount of roadway miles for the st ate and county from the Indiana Department of Transportation’s, Division of Roadway Management Section.

3. Divide the county roadway miles by the state roadw ay miles and multiply by the total asphalt usage for the state found above in step 1.

4. Multiply the process rate by the default emission factor in the E IIP, Volume 3, Chapter 17, Asphalt Paving http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/te chreport/volume03/ iii17_apr2001.pdf

.

14Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1
Sub-Category 3.13: Pesticide Usage

SCC: 2461800000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from pesticide usage:

1. Calculate pesticide usage by using a state spec ific emission factor. Develop the factor using a methodology that includes the retrieval of informat ion of pesticides used, an emission factor for each pesticide used, a calculation about the inert ingredien ts in each pesticide, and an estimate of the amount of crop oil concentrate (an adjuvant used for the application of herbicides) used in the state of Indiana.

2. Find the amount of active ingredients for herbicides and insecticides applied to Indiana fields at the Indiana Agricultural Statistics Service at http://www.usda.gov/nass/pubs/agr02/acro02.htm

. 3. Insert the numbers for both corn and soybeans to the Excel pesticide table found at K:OAQ_INV\Inv\pesticide.

4. Calculate the emission factor by adding the emis sions from crop oil concentrates obtained in the pesticide Excel table, pesticides, and solvent carrie rs and then divide by the total number of acres of corn and soybeans in Indiana found at the National Agricultural Statistics Services, United States Department of Agriculture http://www.nass.usda.gov/QuickStats/

. 5. Multiply the emission factor by the county-specific acreage for both corn and soybeans found at the National Agricultural Statistics Services, United States Department of Agriculture http://www.nass.usda.gov/QuickStats/

. 

### Category 4: Petroleum Marketing

Follow these steps when calculating emissions for bulk terminals:

Sub-Category 4.1: Bulk Terminals

SCC: 2501050120

1. Find the amount of gasoline sold in Indiana at t he Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/po licy/ohim/hs04/htm/mf21.htm

. 2. Find the amount of gasoline sold statewide and by county using, the NAICS code 447-Gasoline Service Station from the U.S. Cens us Bureau’s, Economic Census at http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/data/in/IN000_44.HTM#N447

. 3. Run a query to find the amount of point source reported gasoline using t he ACCESS data tables at K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb and subtract from the amount sold statewide. Use this to allocate to each county.

4. Allocate the amount gasoline sold to each of the counties by dividing the amount of sales in each county by statewide sales and mult iplying by the number of gallons sold statewide found above in step 1.

5. EPA guidance suggests that only 25% of all gas oline consumed goes through bulk plants. To calculate process rate, multiply each county by 25% to estimate the amount of fuel transferred through bulk terminals.

6. Multiply process rate by the emission factors in the table below:

15Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1

Emission Factors

Source Emission Factor (lb VOC/1000) gal Storage Tanks Breathing Loss 5.0

Storage Tank Working Loss - Filling 9.6

Storage Tank Working Loss - Emptying 3.8 Gasoline Loading Racks (Vapor balance controlled) 11.9 (0.3)

Total 30.3

7. Bulk terminals also have controls set forth in the Indiana rule (326 IAC 8-4). This rule says that any source of this type that is new after January 1, 1980 is required to make sure that any transfer between a tank and transport uses a submer ged pipe vapor balance system. Using EPA’s default rule effectiveness, multiply the number in step 2 by the Control Efficiency (CE) 38%, a Rule Effectiveness (RE) of 80%, and a Rule Penetration (RP) of 13%, i.e. process rate X emission factor X (1-(CE x RE x RP)) X 1 ton/2000 lb = VOC tons.

Sub-Category 4.2: Portable Fuel Containers

SCC: 2501011011, 2501011012, 2501011016, 2501012011, 2501012012, 2501012016

Follow these steps when calculating emi ssions for portable fuel containers:

1. Calculate the emissions for Commercial and Residential gas cans by using the method developed by the California Environmental Protection Agency’s docu ment Public Meeting to Consider Approval of California’s Portable Gasoline-Cont ainer Emissions Inventory. Use the excel spreadsheet found at K:\OAQ_INV\Inv\Area Source\Gasoline.zip to calcul ate the emissions for permeation, diurnal, and transport

. Both the Spillage and Vapor losses are esti mated in the nonroad emissions inventory by EPA models.

2. Using the survey results below in Table 1, esti mate the number of fuel containers in the state for residential categories. The calculations are set up in an excel spreadsheet at K:\OAQ_INV\Inv\Area Source\ Gasoline.zip\250101\GasCan s.xls, insert the number of oc cupied housing, from the U.S. Census Bureau’s website at http://www.census.gov/ , in the space marked “households”.

Note: As of the data of this SOP, the following steps will lead to number of households in Indiana.

a. Go to http://www.census.gov/ b. On the left hand side select American Fact finder c. Now select housing d. Under “Occupancy Status”, select occupies housing units e. Now use the drop down menu and select Indiana

Table 1 Residential Survey Results

Percentage of households with at least one gas can 46% Number of gas cans per household 1.8 Percentage of plastic cans/metal cans 76% / 24% Weighted average gas can capacity (gal) 2.34 Percentage of gas cans stored with fuel 70% Weighted average stored fuel volume (% of capacity) 49%

16Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1

Percentage of all gas cans that are plastic and stored open/closed 23% / 53% Percentage of all gas cans that are metal and stored open/closed 11% / 13% Percent of all cans stored open/closed 34% / 66%

3. Using the survey results below in Table 2, esti mate the number of fuel containers for commercial categories for the state. Do this by using the commercial population based on the number of identified businesses in Table 3 and insert into the excel spreadsheet at K:\OAQ_INV\Inv\Area Source\ Gasoline.zip\250101\GasCans.xls.

Table 2 Commercial Survey Results

Percentage of businesses with at least one gas can 80% Number of gas cans per business 6.9 Percentage of plastic cans/metal cans 72% / 28% Weighted average gas can capacity (gal) 3.43 Weighted average stored fuel volume (% of capacity) 49% Percentage of all gas cans that are plastic and stored open/closed 39% / 33% Percentage of all gas cans that are metal and stored open/closed 10% / 18% Percent of all cans stored open/closed 49% / 51%

Table 3 Category NAICS Agricultural 115 Automotive Club and Towing Services 48841
Service Stations 8111
Lawn and Garden Maintenance Services 81141
General Contractors 23
Construction and Rental Yards 5324 Landscaping Services 561730

4. Calculate permeable emissions separately for bot h residential and commercial by using the emission rates given in the California document. Use 1.57g/gal /day for plastic contai ners and 0.6g/gal/day for metal containers. Insert the numbers for both resi dential and commercial into the excel spreadsheet at K:\OAQ_INV\Inv\Area Source\ Gaso line.zip\250101\GasCans.xls.

5. Calculate diurnal emissions by inserting the numbers for both residential and commercial into the excel spreadsheet at K:\OAQ_INV\Inv\Area Source\ Gasoline.zip\250101\GasCans.xls.

6. Calculate transport spillage emissions by inserting the numbers for both residential and commercial into the excel spreadsheet at K:\OAQ_INV\Inv\Area Source\ Gasoline.zip\250101\GasCans.xls

Sub-Category 4.3: Service Station Tank Loading or Tank Truck Unloading (Stage 1)

SCC: 2501060052 (uncontrolled), 2501060053 (controlled)

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from tank loading and unloading

1. Find the amount of gasoline sold in Indiana at the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/po licy/ohim/hs04/htm/mf21.htm

. 2. Find the amount of gasoline sold statewide and county wide by using the NAICS code 447-Gasoline Service Station from the U.S. Cens us Bureau’s, Economic Census at http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/data/in/IN000_44.HTM#N447

.

17Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1

3. Run a query to find the amount of point source reported gasoline using t he ACCESS data tables at K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb and subtract from the amount sold statewide. Use this to allocate to each county.

4. Allocate the amount sold to each of the counties by dividing the amount of sales in each county by statewide sales and multiplying by the number of gallons sold statewide found above in step 1.

5. Find the amount of gasoline tank s from the Underground Storage Tank data files from the Office of Land Quality, Indiana Department of Environmental Management http://www.in.gov/idem/programs/land/ust/ust.html

. 6. Now copy the data into an Excel spreadsheet. Filt er finding the tanks that have only gasoline. Also filter out the tanks that are “permanently out of service”, “suspended per inspection”, and “unregulated”.

7. Using the Petroleum Sources Applicability Rule 326 IAC 8-4-1, filter out the t anks that are located in Clark, Boone, Dearborn, Elkhart, Floyd, Hamilton, Hancock, Harrison, Hendricks, Johnson, Lake, Marion, Morgan, Porter, Saint Joseph, and Shelby counties.

8. To find the amount of balanced tanks in Indiana, use the total of gasoline tanks found in step 7 and divide by the number of tanks that constructed after 1985 through current year. Use the spreadsheet created in step 7 and filter out the t anks that constructed prior to 1985.

9. Now apply the percentage found in step 8 to the amount of gasoline found in each county.

10. Apply the controlled emission factor to only those co unties identified in 326 IAC 8-4, i.e. Boone, Clark, Dearborn, Elkhart, Hamilton, Hancock, Harrison, Hendricks, Johnson, Lake, Marion, Morgan, Porter, Saint Joseph, and Shelby. Use the emission factor s for stage 1 controlled and uncontrolled in the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 11, Gasoline Marketing (Stage 1 and Stage 2) http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii11_apr2001.pdf

.

Sub-Category 4.4: Vehicle Fueling (Stage II) – Vapor Displacement

SCC: 2501060101 (uncontrolled), 2501060102 (controlled)

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from vehicle fueling – Vapor Displacement:

1. Find the amount of gasoline sold in Indiana at t he Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/po licy/ohim/hs04/htm/mf21.htm

. 2. Find the amount of gasoline sold statewi de and by county using the NAICS code 447-Gasoline Service Station from the U.S. Cens us Bureau’s, Economic Census at http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/data/in/IN000_44.HTM#N447

. 3. Allocate the amount sold to each of the counties by dividing the amount of sales in each county by statewide sales and multiplying by the number of gallons sold statewide found above in step 1.

4. Calculate an emission factor using the input file s supplied from the mobile model. Table 1 and Table 2 show examples of how the emission factors fo r January and July for the Southern Counties were calculated. By using these two months, the other months are distributed. Use the average of all months for the emission factor for the Southern counties. Use the same methodology for the Northern counties, Central Countie s, Clark/Floyd, and Lake/Porter.

18Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1

Table 1
January Run for Southern Counties

VTYPE GM_MILE MILES MPG VMT G/GAL Month Factor 1 0.0628 29.4642 23.89 0.463793 0.322719 1 1.01 2 0.1058 35.2923 18.77 0.070491 0.009868 2 1.14 3 0.1058 35.2923 18.77 0.234672 0.109364 3 1.28 4 0.1486 34.0851 14.31 0.071379 0.010834 4 1.41 5 0.1486 34.0851 14.31 0.032825 0.002291 5 1.55 6 0.2152 35.8919 9.88 0.028896 0.001775 6 1.69
7 0.2342 32.3617 9.08 0.001027 2.24E-06 7 1.82 8 0.2465 19.9098 8.63 0.000522 5.8E-07 8 1.69 9 0.2719 27.6093 7.82 0.001164 2.88E-06 9 1.55 10 0.2733 27.4686 7.78 0.002489 1.32E-05 10 1.41 11 0.2972 24.3758 7.15 0.001132 2.72E-06 11 1.28 12 0.3169 23.6257 6.71 0.000004 3.4E-11 12 1.14 25 0.3421 27.2301 6.22 0.000496 5.23E-07 Sum 16.97 0.456873 g/gal Average 1.41 1.007222 lb/E3gal

19Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1

Table 2 July Run for Southern Counties VTYPE GM_MILE MILES MPG VMT G/GAL 1 0.1144 29.1752 23.9 0.456768 0.570447 2 0.1955 34.8826 18.75 0.071404 0.018689 3 0.1955 34.8826 18.75 0.237712 0.207133 4 0.2882 33.944 14.3 0.072838 0.021865 5 0.2882 33.944 14.3 0.033496 0.004624 6 0.4164 35.8288 9.9 0.029201 0.003515
7 0.4529 32.4716 9.1 0.001038 4.44E-06 8 0.4763 19.6757 8.66 0.000509 1.07E-06 9 0.5264 27.4602 7.83 0.00116 5.55E-06 10 0.5283 27.3328 7.8 0.002482 2.54E-05 11 0.5749 24.2458 7.17 0.001122 5.19E-06 12 0.6128 23.3718 6.73 0.000004 6.6E-11 25 0.6629 27.2301 6.22 0.000485 9.7E-07 0.826316 g/gal 1.821697 lb/E3gal

5. Multiply the process rate in step 4 by the emission factor found in the mobile model.

Sub-Category 4.5: Vehicle Fue ling (Stage II) – Spillage

SCC: 2501060103

Follow these steps when calculating emi ssions from vehicle fueling – Spillage:

1. Find the amount of gasoline sold in Indiana at t he Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/po licy/ohim/hs04/htm/mf21.htm

. 2. Find the amount of gasoline sold statewi de and by county using the NAICS code 447-Gasoline Service Station from the U.S. Cens us Bureau’s, Economic Census at http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/data/in/IN000_44.HTM#N447

. 3. Allocate the amount sold to each of the counties by dividing the amount of sales in each county by statewide sales and multiplying by the number of gallons sold statewide found above in step 1.

4. Apply the emission factor 0.7 lb VOC/1000 gallons in AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 5, Petroleum Industry, Transportation, and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch05/final/c05s02.pdf to the process rate found in step 4.

Sub-Category 4.6: Underground Tank Breathing

SCC: 2501060200

Follow these steps when calculating emi ssions from underground tank breathing:

1. Find the amount of gasoline sold in Indiana at t he Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/po licy/ohim/hs04/htm/mf21.htm

. 2. Find the amount of gasoline sold statewi de and by county using the NAICS code 447-Gasoline Service Station from the U.S. Cens us Bureau’s, Economic Census at http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/data/in/IN000_44.HTM#N447

.

20Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1
3. Allocate the amount sold to each of the counties by dividing the amount of sales in each county by statewide sales and multiplying by the number of gallons sold statewide found above in step 1.

4. Apply the emission factor 1.0 lb VOC/1000 gallons in AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 5, Petroleum Industry, Transportation, and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch05/final/c05s02.pdf to the process rate found in step 4.

Sub-Category 4.7: Tank Trucks in Transit

SCC: 2505030120

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from tank trucks in transit:

1. Find the amount of gasoline sold in Indiana at t he Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/po licy/ohim/hs04/htm/mf21.htm

. 2. Find the amount of gasoline sold statewi de and by county using the NAICS code 447-Gasoline Service Station from the U.S. Cens us Bureau’s, Economic Census at http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/data/in/IN000_44.HTM#N447

. 3. Allocate the amount sold to each of the counties by dividing the amount of sales in each county by statewide sales and multiplying by the number of gallons sold statewide found above in step 1.

4. Using the guidance in the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapt er 11, Gasoline Marketing (Stage I and State II) at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii11_apr2001.pdf ), multiply the activity rate 1.25 by the amount sold per county found in step 4.

5. Now multiply the process rate found in step 5 by the emission factor .06 lb VOC/gallon transported using the EIIP guidance above.


### Category 5: Waste Management Practices

Sub-Category 5.1: Solid Waste Incineration

5.1.1: Industrial Solid Waste Incineration

SCC: 2601010000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from industrial solid waste incineration:

1. Find the number of manufacturing employees, NAICS code 31, for each county using the County Business Patterns at the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://censtats.census.gov/c gi-bin/cbpnaic/cbpsel.pl

. Note: Use the steps in 3.2-1 to navi gate through the county business patterns.

2. Multiply the county manufacturing employment by the default fuel-loading factor 420 tons / 1,000 manufacturing employees.

3. Multiply the process rate in step 2 by AP-42, Fi fth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 2-1.12, Solid Waste Disposal at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch02/index.html

.

21Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1

5.1.2: Commercial Solid Waste Incineration

SCC: 2601020000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from commercial solid waste incineration:

1. Find the population for each county at the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov/

. Note: Use steps 2.1-5 to navigate thr ough the U.S. Census Bureau’s website.

2. Next find the default factor of .65lb/person/day from U.S. EPA Municipal Solid Waste Report http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/muncpl/msw99.htm

. 3. Find the percent of co mmercial solid waste from the U.S. EPA Municipal Solid Waste Report above.

4. Now, calculate the process rate for commercial solid waste incineration by multiplying population by the default factor of .65lb/person/day by the percent of commercial solid waste and number of days in a year.

5. Multiply the process rate in step 4 by AP-42, Fi fth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 2-1.12, Solid Waste Disposal at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch02/index.html

.

5.1.3: Residential Solid Waste Incineration

SCC: 2601030000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from residential solid waste incineration:

1. Find the population for each county at the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov/

. Note: Use step 2.1-5 to navigate through the U.S. Census Bureau’s website.

2. Next find the default factor of .65lb/person/day from U.S. EPA Municipal Solid Waste Report http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/muncpl/msw99.htm

. 3. Find the percent of residential solid waste from the U.S. EPA Municipal Solid Waste Report above.

4. Now, calculate the process rate for residentia l solid waste incineration by multiplying population by the default factor of .65lb/person/day by the percent of commercial solid waste and number of days in a year.

5. Multiply the process rate in step 4 by AP-42, Fi fth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 2-1.12, Solid Waste Disposal at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch02/index.html

. Sub-Category 5.2: Residential Open Burning

5.2.1: Leaf and Brush Burning

SCC: 2610000100 and 2610000400

Follow theses step when calculating emissions from leaf and brush burning:

1. Find a per capita factor for l eaf burning and a per capita for brus h burning by using the U.S. EPA’s Solid Waste Report at http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/muncpl/msw99.htm

. 2. Allocate the amount burned by adjusting the per c apita factor for leaves at 25% and for brush at 25%. Of the total waste generated only 28% burns.

22Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1
3. Once all the percentages from above are calculated, multiply the adjusted per capita factor by the rural population for each county from the U.S. Census Bureau at http://www.census.gov/

Note: As of the data of this SOP, the follow ing steps will lead to county rural population.

a. Go to http://www.census.gov/ b. On the left hand side, select American Fact Finder c. Select data sets d. Detailed tables e. County f. Indiana g. All counties

4 Use the table below to adjust the amount of wast e generated to account for the percentage of forest in each county. The percentages come from a doc ument from the United States Department of Agriculture at http://ncrs.fs.fed.us /pubs/rb/rb_nc253b.pdf

.
Percent Forested Acres per County Adjusted for Yard Waste Generated

< 10% 0% generated >= 10%, and < 50% 50% generated

>= 50% 100% generated

5. Now, multiply the amount of leaves and brush by the emission factors found in AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 2, Solid Waste Disposal, Table 2.5-5, and Table 2.5-6 at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch02/final/c02s05.pdf

.

5.2.2: Residential Waste Incineration

SCC: 2610030000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from for residential waste incineration:

1. Find a per capita factor for re sidential waste incinerati on by using the U.S. EPA’ s Solid Waste Report at http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw /muncpl/pubs/mswchar05.pdf

. 2. Using the Solid Waste Report above, subtract the percentage of recycled and composted material from the per capita factor above.

3. Now, subtract the percentages of combustibles i.e. glass, metal, yard trimmings, and other waste.

4. Using a document from EPA, it states that only 28% of waste ge nerated by rural popul ation burns and of that percent, 49% is actually combusted. Using this information multiply the per capita factor by 0.28 and then multiply that number by 0.49 actually burned in rural counties.

5. Once all the percentages are calculated, multiply the adjusted per capita factor by the rural population for each county from the U.S. Census Bureau at http://www.census.gov/

. Note: Use steps 5.2.1-3 to find county rural population.

6. Calculate the amount of residentia l waste by the emission factors in the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 16, Open Burning at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/index.html

. Sub-Category 5.3: Public Owned Treatment Works (POTW’s)

SCC: 2630020000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from POTW’s:

23Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1

1. To calculate the amount of annual flow for public owned treatment works, obtain the amount of monthly flow rate for each county. This is data is supplied by the Office of Water Quality. To calculate for annual flow multiply the monthly flow by the default of 0.16 that represents the amount of industrial flow.

2. Calculate the process rate above by the em ission factors in FIRE 6.25 using the SCC code 2630020000.

Sub-Category 5.4: Treatment, St orage, and Disposal Facilities

SCC: 2640000004

Follow these steps when calculating emissions fr om treatment, storage, and disposal facilities:

1. Obtain a list of treatment facilities and the amount of ignitable waste from each facility from IDEM’s Office of Land Quality.

2. Using the list of facilities from step 1, run a query using the ACCESS data tables at K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb to obtain the amount of ignitable waste reported to IDEM’s Office of Air Quality.

3. Compare the two lists obtained in step 1 and step 2, for each facility subtract any quantity reported to OAQ from the quantity reported to OLQ. Do this in order to avoid double counting quantities reported to both offices. Combine the quantities reported from facilities within the same counties. Use these quantities as the process rate for each county.

4. Multiply the process rate above with th e combined emission factor in the table below:

Emission Source Emission Factor in AP-42 (lb VOC/Ton) Emission Factor Used (lb VOC/Ton) Storage Tank Vent 0.004-0.09 0.09

Spillage (filling) 0.20 0.20 Loading (filling) 0.00024-1.42 1.42 Spillage (emptying) 0.20 0.20 Loading (emptying) 0.00024-1.42 1.42 Combined Emission Factor 3.33



### Category 6: Submit Data to EPA

Submit data in a format that is acceptable to EPA. At the present time the format is the National Emission Inventory (NEI).



### 6. Standards and checklists The Emission Reporting program does not have any chec klist for the Area Source Inventory at this time. The Emission Group does this electronically through an excel spreadsheet that is created when needed.



### 7. Records Management The Area Source Inventory files are kept el ectronically at K:\OAQ_INV\Inv\Area Source.

The Branch Contact for the Air Programs Branch a nd the Section contact for the Technical Support and Modeling Section will keep copies of the SOPs for the Technical Support and Modeling Section to be referenced as needed. An electronic copy will also be available on K:\OAQ_INV\SOPs.

24Area Source Inventory S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

### 8. Quality Assuran ce / Quality Control Comparisons are made against the emissions estimates made by The U.S. EPA in the NEI.


### 9. Continuous Improvement Cycle A periodic review will be completed per updates and changes made to the EIIP.



### 10. References The Area Source Inventory is a requirement of 40 CF R Part 51 Subpart A - Emission Inventory Reporting Requirements.


### 11. History of Revisions

Date Month/day/year Revision Number Description

02/27/2008 1 Revised using new SOP template.



### 12. Appendices None

25

# APPENDIX H

Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO) Emission Estimates Technical Support Document

### F - 1 This page left intentionally blank.

# Regional Air Quality Analyses for

Ozone, PM 2. 5 

# , and Regional Haze:

F inal Technical Support Document

April 25 , 2008

States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsinii 

# Table of Contents

Section

- Title Pa ge

Executive Summary i i i

1

. 0 Introduction 1 1

. 1 SIP Requirements 1 1

. 2 Organization 2 1

. 3 Technical Work: Overview 3

2

. 0 Ambient Data Analyses 4 2

. 1 Ozone 4 2

. 2 PM 2. 5 

### 2 1 2

. 3 Regional Haze 35

3

. 0 Air Quality Model ing 4 6 3

. 1 Selection of Base Year 46 3

. 2 Future Years of Interest 46 3

. 3 Modeling System 4 7 3

. 4 Domain/Grid Resolution 47 3

. 5 Model Inputs: Meteorology 48 3

. 6 Model Inputs: Emissions 51 3

. 7 Base Year Modeling Results 60

4

. 0 Attainment De monstration for Ozone and PM 2.5 

### 7 1 4

. 1 Future Year Modeling Results 71 4

. 2 Supplemental Analyses 82 4

. 3 Weight of Evidence Determination for Ozone 82 4

. 4 Weight of Evidence Determination for PM 2. 5 

### 90

5

. 0 Reasonable Progress Assessment for Regional Haze 9 3 5

. 1 Class I Areas Impacted 93 5

. 2 Future Year Modeling Results 96 5

. 3 Weight of Evidence Determination for Regional Haze 1 04

6

. 0 Summary 1 11

7

. 0 References 1 1 4

Appendix I Ozone and PM 2.5 

### Modeling Results Appendix II Ozone Source Apportio nment Modeling Results Appendix III PM 2.5 

### Source Apportionment Modeling Results Appendix IV Haze Source Apportionment Modeling Resultsiii 

### EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

States in the upper Midwest face a number of air quality challenges. More than 5 0 counties are

cu rrently classified as nonattainment for the 8

- hour ozone standard and 60 for the f ine particle ( PM 2.5 

### ) standard (1997 version s ). A map of these nonattainment areas is provided in the figure below. In addition, visibility impairment due to regional haze is a problem in the larger national parks and wilderness areas (i.e., Class I areas). There are 156 Class I areas in the U.S., including two in northern Michigan

.

Figure i

. Current nonattainment counties for ozone (left) and PM 2. 5 (right )



### T o support the development of State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for ozone, PM 2.5 

### , and regional haze in the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin, technical analyses were conducted by the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO ), its member states, and various contractors

. The analyses include preparation of regional emissions inventories and meteorological data, evaluation and application of regional chemical transport models, and collection and analysis of ambient monitoring data.

M onitoring data were analyzed to produce a conceptual understanding of the air quality problems. Key findings of the analyses include:

Ozone

• Current monitoring data (2005

- 2007) show about 20 sites in violation of the 8

- hour ozone standard of 85 parts per billion (ppb) . Historical ozone data show a steady downward trend over the past 15 years, especially since 2001

- 2003, due likely t o federal and state emission control programs.

• Ozone concentrations are strongly influenced by meteorological con ditions, with more high ozone days and higher ozone levels during summers with above normal temperatures.iv



### • Inter

- and intra

- regional t ransport of ozone and ozone precursors aff ects many portions of the five states , and is the principal cause of nonattainme nt in some areas far from population or industrial centers

.

PM 2.5



### • Current monitoring data (200 5

- 200 7 ) show 3 0 sites in violation of the annual PM 2.5 

### standard of 15 ug/m 3



### . N onattainment sites are characterized by an elevated regional background ( about 12

– 14 ug/m 3 

### ) and a significant local (urban) increment ( about 2

– 3 ug/m 3 

### ). Historical PM 2.5 

### data show a slight downward trend since deployment of the PM 2.5 

### monitoring network in 1999.

• PM 2.5 

### concentrations are also influenced by meteorology , but the re lationship is more complex and less well understood compared to ozone.

• O n an annual average basis, PM 2.5 

### chemical composition consists mostly of sulfate, nitrate, and organic carbon in similar proportions.

Haze

• Current monitoring data (2000

- 2004) show visibility levels in the Class I areas in northern Michigan are on the order of 2 2

– 2 4 deciviews . The goal of EPA’s visibility program is to achieve natural conditions, which is about 12 deciviews for these Class I areas, by the year 2064.

• Visibility im pairment is dominated by sulfate and nitrate.

Air quality models were applied to s upport the regional planning efforts

. Two base years were used in the modeling analyses: 2002 and 2005. B asecase modeling was conducted to evaluate model performance (i.e., assess the model's ability to reproduce observed concentrations ) . This exercise wa s intended to build confidence in the model prior to its use in examining co ntrol strategies. M odel performance for ozone and PM 2.5 

### was found to be generally acceptable.

Future year strategy modeling was conducted to determine whether existing (“on the books”) controls would be sufficient to provide for attainment of the standards for ozone and PM 2.5 

### and if not, then what additional emission reductions would be necessary f or attainment. Based on th e modeling and other supplemental analyses , the following general conclusions can be made:

• E xisting controls are expected to produce significant improvement in ozone and 

### PM 2.5 

### concentrations and visibility levels

.

• The choice of

the base year affects the future year model projections. A key difference between the base years of 2002 and 2005 is meteorology. 2002 was more ozone conducive than 2005. The choice of which base year to use as the basis for the SIP is a policy decisio n (i.e., how much safeguard to incorporate).

• M odeling suggests that mo st sites are expected to meet the current 8

- hour ozone standard by the applicable attainment date, except for sites in western Michigan and, possibly, in eastern Wisconsin a nd northeast ern Ohio.v



### • Modeling suggests that m ost sites a re expected to meet the current PM 2.5 

### standard by the applicable attainment date, except for sites in Detroit, Cleveland, and Granite City

.

T he regiona l modeling for PM 2.5 

### does not include air quality benefit s expected from local controls. States are conducting local

- scale analyses and will us e these results, in conjunction with the regional

- scale modeling, to support their attainment demonstrations for PM 2.5



### .

• These findings of residual nonattainment for ozon e and PM 2.5 

### are supported by current (2005

– 2007) monitoring data which show significant nonattainment in the region (e.g., peak ozone design values on the order of 90

– 93 ppb, and peak PM 2.5 

### d esign values on the order of 16

- 17 ug/m 3 

### ). It is unlikely that sufficient emission reductions will occur in the next couple of years to provide for attainment at all sites.

• Attainment at most sites by the applicable attainment date is dependent on actual future year meteorology (e.g., if the weather conditions a re consistent with [or less severe than] 2005, then attainment is likely) and actual future year emissions (e.g., if the emission reductions associated with the existing controls are achieved, then attainment is likely). I f either of these conditions is n ot met, then attainment may be less likely.

• M ode ling s uggests that the new PM 2.5 

### 24

- hour standard and the new lower ozone standard will not be met at several sites , even by 2018, with existing controls.

• Visibility levels in a few Class I areas in the eas tern U.S. are expected to be greater than

(less improved than) the uniform rate of visibility improvement value s in 2018 based on existing controls , including those in northern Michigan and s ome in the northeastern U.S. Visibility levels in m any other Cla ss I areas in the eastern U.S. are expected to be less than (more improved than) the uniform rate of visibility improvement value s in 2018. These results, along with information on the costs of compliance, time necessary for compliance, energy and non air

quality environmental impacts of compliance, and remaining useful life of existing sources, should be considered by the states in setting reasonable progress goals for regional haze.1 

### Section 1. 0 Introduction

This Technical Support Document summarizes the final air quality analyses conducted by the Lake Michigan Directors Consortium (LADCO) 1 

### and its contractors to support the development of State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for ozone, fine particles ( PM 2.5 

### ), and regional haze in the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin

. The analyses include preparation of regional emissions inventories and meteorological modeling data for two base years (2002 and 2005), evaluation and application of regional chemical transport models, and analysis of ambient monitoring data.

Two aspects of the analyses should be emphasize d. First, a regional , multi

- pollutant approach was taken in addressing ozone, PM 2.5 

### , and haze f or technical reasons (e.g., common ality in precursors, emission sources, atmosphe ric processes, transport influences, and geographic areas of concern), and practical reasons (e.g., more efficient use of program resources). Furthermore, EPA has consistently encouraged multi

- pollutant planning in its rule for the haze program (64 FR 357 19), and its implementation guidance for ozone (70 FR 71663) and PM 2.5 

### (72 FR 20609). Second, a weight

- of

- evidence approach was taken in considering the results of the various analyses (i.e., two sets of modeling results

-- one for a 2002 base year and on e for a 2005 base year

-- and ambient data analyses) in order to provide a more robust assessment of expected future year air quality.

The report is orga nized in the following sections. This I ntroduction p rovides an overview of regulatory requirements and background information on regional planning . Section 2 r eviews the ambient monitoring data and presents a conceptual model of ozone, PM 2.5 

### , and haze for the region . Section 3 d iscusses the air quality modeling analyses, including development of the k ey model inputs (emissions inventory and meteorological data), and basecase model performance evaluation . A modeled a ttainment d emonstration for o zone and PM 2.5 

### is presented in Section 4, along with relevant data analyses considered as part of the weight

- of

- evidence de termination

. Section 5 documents the r easonable p rogress a ssessment for r egional h aze , a long with relevant data analyses considered as part of the weight

- of

- evidence determination . Finally, ke y study findings are reviewed and summarized in Section 6.

1.1 SIP Requirements For ozone, EPA promulgated designations on April 15, 2004 (69 FR 23858, April 30, 2004). In the 5

- state region, m ore than 100 counties were designated as nonattainment

. 2 

### The designations became effective on June 15, 2004. SIPs for ozone we re due no later than three years from the effective date of the nonattainment designations (i.e., by June 2007). The attainment date for ozone varies as a function of nonattainment classification. For the region, the attainment dates a re either June 2007 (marginal nonattainment areas), June 2009 (basic nonattainment areas), or June 2010 (moderate nonattainment areas).

1 A sub

- entity of LADCO, known as the Midwest Regional Planning Organization (MRPO), is responsible for the regional haze activities of the multi

- state organization.

2 Based on more recent air quality data, many counties in Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio were subsequently redesignated as attainment. As of December 31 , 2007, there are 53 counties designated

as n onattainment in the region.2



### For PM 2.5 

### , EPA promulgated designations on December 17, 2004 (70 FR 944, January 5, 2005). In the 5

- state region, 70 c ounties were designated as nonattainment. 3 

### The designations bec a me effective on April 5, 2005. SIPs for PM 2.5 

### are due no later than three years from the effective date of the nonattainment designations (per section 172(b) of the Clean Air Act) (i.e., by A pril 2008) and for haze no later than three years after the date on which the Administrator promulgate d the PM 2.5 

### designations (per the Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2004) (i.e., by December 2007). The applicable attainment date for PM 2.5 

### nonattainment ar eas is five years from the date of the nonattainment designation (i.e., by April 2010).

For haze, the Clean Air Act sets “as a national goal the prevention of any future, and the remedying of any existing, impairment of visibility in Class I ar eas which impairment results from manmade air pollution.” T here are 156 Class I areas, including two in northern Michigan: Isle Royale National Park and Seney National Wildlife Refuge 4



### . EPA’s visibility rule (64 FR 35714, July 1, 1999) require s reasonabl e progress in achieving “natural conditions” by the year 2064. As noted above, the first regional haze SIP wa s due in December 2007 and must address the initial 10

- year implementation period (i.e., reasonable progress by the year 2018). SIP requirements (pursuant to 40 CFR 51.308(d)) include setting reasonable progress goals, determining baseline conditions, determining natural conditions, providing a long

- term control strategy, providing a monitoring strategy (air quality and emissions), and establishing BART emissions limitations and associated compliance schedule.

1.2 Organization LADCO wa s established by the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin in 1989. T he four states and EPA signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) that initiated t he Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS) and identified LADCO as the organization to oversee th e study. Additional MOAs were signed by the States in 1991 (to establish the Lake Michigan Ozone Control Program)

, January 2000 (to broaden LADCO’s responsibilities) , and June 2004 (to update LADCO’s mission and reaffirm the commitment to regional planning). In March 2004, Ohio joined LADCO. LADCO consists of a Board of Directors (i.e., the State Air Directors), a technical staff, and various workgroups. The main p urpose s of LADCO are to provide technical assessments for and assistance to its member states

, and to provide a forum for its member states to discuss regional air quality issues.

MRPO is a similar entity led by the five LADCO States and involves the fe derally recognized tribes in Michigan and Wisconsin

, EPA

, and Federal Land Managers (i.e., National Park Service, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Agency, and U.S. Forest Service )

. In October 2000, the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin signed a n MOA that established the MRPO. An

o perating principles document for M RPO, which describe the roles and responsibilities of states, tribes, federal agencies, and stakeholders, w as issued in March 2001

. M RPO has a similar
purpose as LADCO , but is focus ed on visibility impairment due to regional haze in the Federal Class I areas located inside the borders of the five states, and the impact of emissions from the five states on visibility impairment due to regional haze in the Federal Class I areas located outside the borders of the five states. MRPO works cooperatively with the R egional Planning Organizations (R POs ) representing other parts of the country. The RPOs sponsored several

3 USEPA subsequently adjusted the final designations, which resulted in 63 counties in the region being designate d as nonattainment (70 FR 19844, April 15, 2005)

.

4 Although Rainbow Lake in northern Wisconsin is also a Class I area, the visibility rule does not apply because the Federal Land Manager determined that visibility is not an air quality related value there

.3



### joint projects and, with assistance by EPA, maintain regular contact on technical and policy matters.

1.3 Technical Work: Overview To ensure the reliability and effectiveness of its planning process, LADCO has made data collec tion and analysis a priority. M ore than $ 7 M in RPO grant funds were used for special purpose monitor ing, preparing and improving emissions inventories, and conducting air quality analyses 5 

### . An overview of the technical work is provided below.

Monitoring: Numerous monitoring projects were conducted to supplement on

- going state and local air pollution mo nitoring. These projects include rural monitoring (e.g., comprehensive sampling in the Seney National Wildlife Refuge and in Bondville, IL ) ; urban monitoring (e.g., continuation of the St. Louis Supersite); aloft (aircraft) measurements; regional ammonia monitoring; and organic speciation sampling in Seney, Bondville, and five urban areas.

Emissions: B aseyear emissions inventor ies were prepared for 2002 and 2005 . States provided point source and area source emissions data , and MOBILE6 input files and mob ile source activity data. LADCO and its contractors developed the emissions data for other source categories (e.g., select nonroad sources, ammonia, fires, and biogenics) and processed the data for input into an air quality model. To support control stra tegy modeling, future year inventories were prepared. The future years of interest include 2008 (planning year to address the 2009 attainment year for basic ozone nonattainment ares), 2009 ( planning year to address the 2010 attainment year for P M 2.5 

### and m oderate ozone nonattainment areas ), 2012 ( planning to address a 201 3 alternative attainment date), and 2018 (first milestone year for regional haze).

Air Quality Analyses: The weight

- of

- evidence approach relies on data analysis and modeling. Air quality data analyses were used to provide both a conceptual model (i.e., a qualitative description of the o zone , PM 2.5 

### , and regional haze problems) and supplemental information for the attainment demonstration . Given uncertainties in emissions inventories and mo deling

, especially for PM 2. 5 

### , these data analyses are a necessary part of the overall technical support.

Modeling includes baseyear analyses for 2002 and 2005 to evaluate model performance and future year strategy analyses to assess candidate control stra tegies. The analyses wer e conducted in accordance with EPA’s modeling guidelines ( EPA, 2007a)

. The PM/haze modeling cover s the full calendar year (2002 and 2005 ) for an eastern U.S. 36 km domain, while the ozone modeling focus es on the summer period (200 2 and 2005 ) for a Midwest 12 km subdomain. The same model (CAMx) was used for ozone, PM 2.5 

### , and regional haze

.

5 Since 1999, MRPO has received almost $10M in RPO grant funds from USEPA.4 

### Section 2.0 Ambient Data Analyses

An extensive network of air quality monitors in the 5

- state region provides data for ozone (and its precurs ors)

, PM 2. 5 

### ( both total mass and individual chemical species), and visibility. These data are used to determine attainment/nonattainment designations, support SIP development, and provide air quality information to public (see, for example, www.airnow.gov ).

Analys e s of the data were conducted to produce a conceptual model, which is a qualitative

summar y of the physical, chemical

, and m eteorological processes that control the formation and distribution of pollutants i n a given region. This section reviews the relevant data analyses and describes our understanding of ozone, PM 2.5, 

### and r egional haze with respect to c urrent

co nd i tions

, d ata variability ( spatial, temporal, and chemical)

, i nfluence of meteorology

( includin g t ransport patterns )

, p recursor s ensi tivity, and s ource culpability.

2.1 Ozone In 1979, EPA adopted an ozone standard of 0.12 ppm, averaged over a 1

- hour period. This standard i s attained when the number of days per calendar year with maximum hourly av erage concentrations above 0.12 ppm is equal to or less than 1.0, averaged over a 3

- year period

, which generally reflects a design value (i.e., the 4 th 

### highest daily 1

- hour value over a 3

- year period) less than 0.12 ppm.

In 1997, EPA tightened the ozone s tandard to 0.08 ppm, averaged over an 8

- hour period 6



### . T he standard is attain ed if

the 3

- year average of the 4th

- highest daily maximum 8

- hour average ozone concentrations ( i.e., the design value) measured at each monitor within an area is less than 0.08 pp m (or 85 ppb)

.

Current C onditions : A map of the 8

- hour ozone design values at each monitoring site in the region for the 3

- year period 2005

- 2007 is shown in Figure 1. The “hotter” colors represent higher concentrations , where yellow and orange dots re present sites w ith design values above the standard

. Currently, there are 1 9 sites in violation of the 8

- hour oz one NAAQS in the 5

- state region, including sites in the Lake Michigan area, Detroit, Cleveland, Cincinnati, and Columbus.

Table 1 provides the 4 th



### - highest daily 8

- hour ozone values and the associated design values since 2001 for several high monitoring sites throughout the region.

6 On March 12, 2008 , USEPA further t ighten ed the 8

- hour ozone standard to increase public health protection and prevent environmental damage from ground

- level ozone. USEPA set the primary (health) standard and secondary (welfare) standard at the same level : 0.075 ppm (75 ppb), averaged ove r an 8

- hour period.5 Figure 1

. 8

- h our o zone d esign v alues ( 200 5

- 2007 )Key Sites '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '01-'03 '02-'04 '03-'05 '04-'06 '05-'07

Lake Michigan Area Chiwaukee 99 116 88 78 93 79 85 101 94 86 83 85 Racine 92 111 82 69 95 71 77 95 87 82 78 81 Milwaukee-Bayside 93 99 92 73 93 73 83 94 88 86 79 83 Harrington Beach 102 93 99 72 94 72 84 98 88 88 79 83 Manitowoc 97 83 92 74 95 78 85 90 83 87 82 86 Sheboygan 102 105 93 78 97 83 88 100 92 89 86 89 Kewaunee 90 92 97 73 88 76 85 93 87 86 79 83 Door County 95 95 93 78 101 79 92 94 88 90 86 90 Hammond 90 101 81 67 87 75 77 90 83 78 76 79 Whiting 64 88 81 88 77 85 Michigan City 90 107 82 70 84 75 73 93 86 78 76 77 Ogden Dunes 85 101 77 69 90 70 84 87 82 78 76 81 Holland 92 105 96 79 94 91 94 97 93 89 88 93 Jenison 86 93 91 69 86 83 88 90 84 82 79 85 Muskegon 95 96 94 70 90 90 86 95 86 84 83 88

Indianapolis Area Noblesville 88 101 101 75 87 77 84 96 92 87 79 82 Fortville 89 101 92 72 80 75 81 94 88 81 75 78 Fort B. Harrison 87 100 91 73 80 76 83 92 88 81 76 79

Detroit Area New Haven 95 95 102 81 88 78 93 97 92 90 82 86 Warren 94 92 101 71 89 78 91 95 88 87 79 86 Port Huron 84 100 87 74 88 78 89 90 87 83 80 85

Cleveland Area Ashtabula (Conneaut) 97 103 99 81 93 86 92 99 94 91 86 90 Notre Dame (Geauga) 99 115 97 75 88 70 68 103 95 86 77 75 Eastlake (Lake) 89 104 92 79 97 83 74 95 91 89 86 84 Akron (Summit) 98 103 89 77 89 77 91 96 89 85 81 85

Cincinnati Area Wilmington (Clinton) 93 99 96 78 83 81 82 96 91 85 80 82 Sycamore (Hamilton) 88 100 93 76 89 81 90 93 89 86 82 86 Hamilton (Butler) 83 100 94 75 86 79 91 92 89 85 80 85 Middleton (Butler) 87 98 83 76 88 76 91 89 85 82 80 85 Lebanon ( Warren) 85 98 95 81 92 86 88 92 91 89 86 88

Columbus Area London (Madison) 84 97 90 75 81 76 83 90 87 82 77 80 New Albany (Franklin) 90 103 94 78 92 82 87 95 91 88 84 87 Franklin (Franklin) 83 99 84 73 86 79 79 88 85 81 79 81

Ohio Other Areas Marietta ( Washington) 85 95 80 77 88 81 86 86 84 81 82 85

St. Louis Area W. Alton (MO) 85 99 91 77 89 91 89 91 89 85 85 89 Orchard (MO) 88 98 90 76 92 92 83 92 88 86 86 89 Sunset Hills (MO) 88 98 88 70 89 80 89 91 85 82 79 86 Arnold (MO) 86 93 82 70 92 79 87 87 81 81 80 86 Margaretta (MO) 80 98 90 72 91 76 91 89 86 84 79 86 Maryland Heights (MO) 88 84 94 88 4th High 8-hour Value Design Values Table 1. Ozone Data for Select Sites in 5-State Region7



### Meteorology

and Transport

: Most pollutants exhibit some dependence on meteorological factors, especially wind direction, because that governs which sources are upwind and thus most influential on a given sample. Ozone is even more dependent, since its production is driven by high temperatures and sunligh t

, as well as precursor concentrations (see, for example, Figure 2 )

.

Figure 2. Number of h ot d ays and 8

- h our “ e xceedance” d ays in 5

- state region



### Qualitatively, ozone episodes in the region are associated with hot weather, clear skies (sometimes hazy ), low wind speeds, high solar radiation, and southerly to southwesterly winds. These conditions are often a result of a s low

- moving high pressure system to the east of the region. The relative importance of various meteorological factors is discussed la ter in this section.

Transport of ozone (and its precursors) is a significant factor and occurs on several spatial scales. Regionally, o ver a multi

- day period, somewhat stagnant summertime conditions can lead to the build

- up in ozone and ozone precursor concentrations over a large spatial area

. Th is pollutant air mass can be advected long distances, resulting in elevated ozone levels in locations far downwind. An example of such an episode is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Example of e levated r egional o zone c oncentrations (June 23

– 25, 2005)

Note: hotter colors represent higher concentrations, with orange representing concentrations above the 8

- hour standard8



### Local ly, emissions from urban areas add to the regional background leading to ozone concentration hot spots downwind. Depending on the synoptic wind patterns (and local land

lake breezes), different downwind areas are affected (see, for example, Figure 4).

Figure 4. Examples of r ecent h igh o zone d a ys in the Lake Michigan a rea

Note: hotter colors represent higher concentrations, with orange representing concentrations above the 8

- hour standard



### Aloft (aircraft) measurements in the Lake Michigan area also provide evidence of elevated regional backgro und concentrations and “plumes” from urban areas. For one example summer day (August 20, 2003

– see Figure 5), the incoming background ozone levels were on the order of 80

– 100 ppb and the downwind ozone levels over Lake Michigan were on the order of 100

- 150 ppb (STI, 2004)

.

Figure 5. Aircraft o zone m easurements over Lake Michigan (left) and a long u pwind b oundary (right)

– August 20, 2003 (Note: aircraft measurements reflect instantaneous values)9



### As discussed in Section 4, residual nonattainment is projected in at least one area in the 5

- state region

– i.e., western Michigan. To understand the source regions likely impacting high ozone concentrations in western Michigan and e stimate the impact of these source regions , two s imple transport

- related analyses were performed

. First, back trajectories were constructed using the HYSPLIT model for high ozone days (8

- hour peak > 80 ppb) during the period 2002

- 2006 in western Michigan to characterize general transport patterns. Comp osite trajectory plots for all high ozone days based on data from three sites (Cass County, Holland, and Muskegon) are provided in Figure 6. The plots point back to areas located to the south

- southwest (especially, northeastern Illinois and northwestern I ndiana) as being upwind on these high ozone days.

Figure 6 Back t rajectory a nalysis s howing u pwind a reas a ssociated with h igh o zone
c oncentrations



### Second, to assess the impact from Chicago /NW Indiana , Blanchard (2005 a ) compar ed ozone concentrat ions upwind (Braidwood, IL), within Chicago (ten sites in the City), and downwind (Holland and Muskegon) for days in 1999

– 2002 with southwesterly winds

- i.e., transport towards western Michigan. Figure 7 shows the distribution of daily peak 8

- hour ozon e concentrations by day

- of

- week, with a line connecting the mean values. The difference between day

- of

- week mean values at downwind and upwind sites indicates that Chicago /NW Indiana contribute s about 10

- 15 ppb to downwind ozone levels.10

Figure 7 . Mean day

- of

- week peak 8

- hour ozone concentrations at sites upwind, within, and downwind of Chicago, 1999

– 2002 (southwesterly wind days)



### Based on this information, the following key findings related to transport can be made:

• 

### Ozone transport is a problem af fecting many portions of the eastern U.S. The Lake Michigan area (and other areas in the LADCO region ) both receive high levels of incoming (transported) ozone and ozone precursors from upwind source areas on many hot summer days, and contribute to the hi gh levels of ozone and ozone precursors affecting downwind receptor areas.

• 

### The presence of a large body of water (i.e., Lake Michigan) influences for the formation and transport of ozone in the Lake Michigan area . Depending on large

- scale synoptic winds and local

- scale lake breezes, different parts of the area experience high ozone concentrations. For example, under southerly flow, high ozone can occur in eastern Wisconsin, and under southwesterly flow, high ozone can occur in western Michigan.

• 

### Downwi nd shoreline areas around Lake Michigan are affected by both regional transport of ozone and subregional transport from major cities in the Lake Michigan area

. Counties along the western shore of Michigan (from Benton Harbor to Traverse City, and

even as far north as the Upper Peninsula) are impacted by high levels of incoming (transported) ozone.11



### Data V ariability : Since 1980, considerable progress has been made to meet the previous 1

- hour ozone standard. Fig ure 8 shows the decline in both the 1

- hour a nd 8

- hour design values for the 5

- state LADCO region over the last 25 years.

Figure 8 Oz one d esign v alue t rends in 5

- State r egion



### The trend i s more dramatic for the higher ozone sites in the 5

- state region (see Figure 9 ) . This plot shows a pronoun ced downward trend in the design value since the 2001

- 2003 period , due, in part, to the very low 4 th 

### high values in 2004.

Figure 9. Trend in o zone d esign v alues and 4 th h igh v alues for higher ozone s ites in r egion



### The imp rovement in ozone concentrations is also seen in the decrease in the number of sites measuring nonattainment over the past 15 years in the Lake Michigan area (see Figure 10). 75 85 95 105

'95-'97 '96-'98 '97-'99 '98-'00 '99-'01 '00-'02 '01-'03 '02-'04 '03-'05 '04-'06 '05-'07

65 75 85 95 105 115

'95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 

### Design Values

4 th 

### High Values12 Figure 10 . Ozone d esign v alue m aps for 1995

- 1 997, 2000

- 2002, and 2 00 5

- 200 713



### Given the effect of meteorology on ambient ozone levels, year

- to

- year variations in meteorology can make it difficult to assess trends in ozone air quality. Two approaches were considered to adjust ozone trends for meteorological influences : an air quality

- meteorology statistical m odel developed by EPA (i.e., Cox method), and statistical grouping of meteorological variables performed by LADCO (i.e., Classification and Regression Trees, or CART).

Cox M ethod

: This method uses a statistical m odel to ‘remove’ the annual effect of meteorology on ozone (Cox and Chu, 1993 ). A regression model was fit to the 1997

- 2007 data to relate daily peak 8

- hour ozone concentrations to six daily meteorological variables plus seasonal and annual factors (Kensk i, 2008a) . Meteorological variables included were daily maximum temperature, mid

- day average relative humidity, morning and afternoon wind speed and wind direction. The model is then used to predict 4 th 

### high ozone values. By holding the meteorological e ffects constant, the long term trend can be examined independently of meteorology. Presumably

, any trend reflects changes in emissions of ozone precursors.

Figure 11a shows the meteorologically

- adjusted 4 th 

### high ozone concentrations for several monitor s near major urban areas in the region . The plots indicate a general downward trend since the late 1990s for most cities, indicating that recent emission reductions have had a positive effect in improving ozone air quality.

A similar model was run to e xamine meteorologically adjusted trends in seasonal average ozone. This model incorporates more meteorological variables, including rain and long

- distance transport (direction and distance). Model development was docume nted in Camalier et al., 2007. The seasonal average trend s are shown in Figure 11b. Trends determined by seasonal model for the same set of sites examined above are consistent with those developed by the 4 th 

### high model

.14 Chiwaukee, WI Sheboygan, WI

Cleveland (Ashtabula ), OH Cincinnati (Sycamore) , OH

Detroit (New Haven), MI St. Louis, MO

Indianapolis, IN

Figure 11 a

. Trends in meteorologically adjusted 4 th high 8

- hour ozone concentrations for seven Mid western sites (199 7

– 200 7 )15 Chiwaukee, WI Sheboygan, WI

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 20 40 60 80Seasonal Average Ozone (ppb)

Adjusted for Weather

Unadjusted for Weather

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 20 40 60 80Seasonal Average Ozone (ppb)

Adjusted for Weather

Unadjusted for Weather

Cleveland (Ashtabula), OH Cincinnati (Sycamore) , OH

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 20 40 60 80Seasonal Average Ozone (ppb)

Adjusted for Weather

Unadjusted for Weather

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 20 40 60 80Seasonal Average Ozone (ppb)

Adjusted for Weather

Unadjusted for Weather

Detroit (New Haven), MI St. Louis, MO

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 20 40 60 80Seasonal Average Ozone (ppb)

Adjusted for Weather

Unadjusted for Weather

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 20 40 60 80Seasonal Average Ozone (ppb)

Adjusted for Weather

Unadjusted for Weather

Indianapolis, IN

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 20 40 60 80Seasonal Average Ozone (ppb)

Adjusted for Weather

Unadjusted for Weather Figure 11b

. Trends in seasonal 8

- hour ozone concentrations for seven Mid western sites (199 7

– 200 7 )16



### CART : Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis is another statistical technique which partitions data sets into similar groups (Breiman et al., 1984). CART analysis was performed using data for the period 1995

- 2007 for 22 selected ozone monitors w ith current 8

- h ou r design values close to or above the standard (Kenski, 2008 b )

. T he CART model searches through 60 meteorological variables to determine which are most efficient in predicting ozone. Although the exact sel ection of predictive variables changes from site to site, the most common predictors we re temperature, wind direction, and relative humidity. Only occasionally were upper air variables, transport time or distance, lake breeze, or other variables s ignifica nt. (Note, the o zone and met eorological data for the CART analysis a re the same as used in the EPA/Cox analysis.)

For each monitor, regression trees were developed that classify each summer day (May

September) by its meteorological conditions. Similar d ays are assigned to nodes, which are equivalent to branches of the regression tree. Ozone time series for the higher concentration nodes are plotted for select sites in Fig ure 12 . By grouping days with similar meteorology, the influence of meteorological variability on the trend in ozone concentrations is partially removed; the remaining trend is presumed to be due to trends in precursor emissions or other non

meteorological influences. Trends over the 13

- year period at most sites were found to be declin ing, with the exception of Detroit which showed fairly flat trends. C omparison of the average of the high concentration node values for 2001

- 2003 v. 2005

- 2007 showed an improvement of about 5 ppb across all sites (even Detroit)

. The effect of meteorology was further examined by using an ozone conduciveness index (Kenski, 2008 b ) . This metric reflects the variability from the 1 3

- year average in the number of days in the higher ozone concentration nodes (see Figure 13)

. Examination of these plots indicates :

• 

### 2002 and 2005 w

ere both above normal

, with 2002 tending to be more severe ; and

• 

### 2001

- 2003 and 2005

- 2007 were both above normal, with no clear pattern in which period was more severe (i.e., ozone conduciveness values were similar at most sites, 2001

- 2003 values were higher at a few sites, and 2005

- 2007 values were higher at a few sites)

. Given the similarity in ozone conduciveness between 2001

- 2003 and 2005

- 2007, the improvement in ozone levels noted above is presumed to be due to non

- meteorological fact ors (i.e., emission reductions).

In conclusion, a ll three statistical approaches ( CART and the two nonlinear regression models) show a similar result ; ozone in the urban areas of the LADCO region has declined during the 1997

- 2007 period, even when meteoro logical variability is accounted for. The decreases are present whether seasonal average ozone, peak values (annual 4 th 

### highs), or a subset of high days with similar meteorology are considered . The consistency in results across models is a good indicatio n that these trends reflect impacts of emission control programs

.17 Chiwaukee, WI Sheboygan, WI

Cleveland (Ashtabula), OH Cincinnati (Sycamore) , OH

Detroit (New Haven), MI St. Louis, MO

Indianapolis, IN

Figure 12

. Trends for higher o zone C ART groups (average ozone > 6 5 ppb) for seven Midwestern sites (199 5

– 20 0 7 )

Note: line represents linear best fit18 Figure 13 . Ozone c onduciveness i ndex (and number of high ozone days) f or s even M idwestern site (199 5

– 200 7 )19



### Pr ecursor S ensitivity : O zone i s formed from the reactions of hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides under meteorological conditions that are conducive to such reactions (i.e., warm temperatures and strong sunlight )

. In areas with high VOC/NO x ratios, typical of r ural environments ( with low NO x), ozone tends to be more responsive to reductions in NO x . Conversely, in areas with low VOC/NO x

ratios, typical of urban environments (with h i gh NOx) , ozone tends to be more responsive to VOC reductions.

An analysis of V OC and NO x 

### - limitation was conducted with the ozone MAPPER program, which is based on the Smog Production (SP) algorithm (Blanchard

, et al., 200 3 ) . The “Extent of Reaction” parameter in the SP algorithm provides an indication of VOC and NOx sensitivity:

Extent Range Precursor Sensitivity

< 0 .6 VOC

- sensitive 0. 6

– 0.8 Transitional > 0.8 NOx

- sensitive



### A map of the Extent of Reaction values for high ozone days is provided in Figure 1 4 . As can be
seen, ozone is usually VOC

- l imited in cities and NOx

- limited in rural areas. ( Data from aircraft measurements suggest that ozone is usually NO x 

### - limited over Lake Michigan and away from urban centers on days when ozone in the urban centers is VOC

- limited. ) T he highest ozone days we re found t o be NO x 

### - limite d. This analysis suggests that a NOx reduction strategy would be effective in reducing ozone levels. Examination of day

- of

- week concentrations, however, raises some question about the effectiveness of NOx reductions.

Figure 1 4 . Mean afternoon extent of reaction (1998

– 2002)