alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4854 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2018 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 

2000 to provide additional resources to State and local 

prosecutors, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


Sspencer on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4854 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice Served Act 

3 of 2018’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROSECUTION OF DNA COLD CASES. 

5 (a) DEBBIE SMITH DNA BACKLOG GRANT PRO6 GRAM.—Section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimi7 nation Act of 2000 (34 U.S.C. 40701) is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the 

9 following: 

10 ‘‘(9) To increase the capacity of State and local 

11 prosecution offices to address the backlog of violent 

12 crime cases in which suspects have been identified 

13 through DNA evidence.’’; and 

14 (2) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the 

15 following: 

16 ‘‘(5) ALLOCATION OF GRANT AWARDS FOR

17 PROSECUTORS.—For each fiscal year, not less than 

18 5 percent, but not more than 7 percent, of the grant 

19 amounts distributed under paragraph (1) shall, if 

20 sufficient applications to justify such amounts are 

21 received by the Attorney General, be awarded for 

22 purposes described in subsection (a)(9), provided 

23 that none of the funds required to be distributed 

24 under this paragraph shall decrease or otherwise 

25 limit the availability of funds required to be awarded 


Sspencer on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4854 RDS

1 to States or units of local government under para2 graph (3).’’. 

3 (b) PROSECUTION OF COLD CASES.—Of the amounts 

4 made available to the Attorney General for a DNA Anal5 ysis and capacity enhancement program and for other 

6 local, State, and Federal forensic activities for the purpose 

7 described in section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimi8 nation Act of 2000 (34 U.S.C. 40701) under the heading 

9 ‘‘STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE’’ 

10 under the heading ‘‘OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS’’ 

11 under the heading ‘‘DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE’’ in 

12 fiscal years 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, not less than 

13 5 percent, but not more than 7 percent, of such amounts 

14 shall be provided for grants for prosecutors to increase 

15 the capacity of State and local prosecution offices to ad16 dress cold cases involving violent crime, where suspects 

17 have been identified through DNA evidence. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 15, 2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


Sspencer on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# TIME AND DATE: 

10:00 a.m., Thursday, January 18, 2024.

# PLACE: 

Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7B, 1775 Duke Street (All visitors must use Diagonal Road Entrance), Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Board Briefing, NCUA's 2024-2026 Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility Strategic Plan.

2. NCUA's 2024 Annual Performance Plan.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2024-00830 Filed 1-12-24; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
# C_2008171EN.01003902.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/39

---

Appeal brought on 24 April 2008 by R against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 19 February 2008 in Case F-49/07, R v Commission

(Case T-156/08 P)

(2008/C 171/75)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: R (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by Y. Minatchy, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

| — | Annul the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union of 19 February 2008 in Case F-49/07; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union of 19 February 2008 in Case F-49/07;

| — | Grant the application for annulment and damages made by the applicant at first instance; |
| --- | --- |

—

Grant the application for annulment and damages made by the applicant at first instance;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In the present appeal, the applicant is seeking the annulment of the order of the Civil Service Tribunal (‘the Tribunal’) dismissing as inadmissible the action in which he applied, first, for the annulment of his entire probationary period and all the measures produced in that connection, including the end of probationary period report, and, second, for damages by way of compensation for the loss allegedly suffered.

In support of his appeal, the applicant relies, first, on a denial of due process inasmuch as the Tribunal did not take account of certain factors and documents submitted by the applicant and, second, on an erroneous interpretation of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal and the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities. The applicant also relies on manifest errors in the assessment of the facts.

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6675** 

JAKE HENDRIX , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; DIRECTOR MICHAEL MOORE , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. J. Michelle Childs , District Judge. ( 4:14

- cv - 00971

- JMC )

Submitted : July 23, 2015 Decided: July 28, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Jake Hendrix , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Jake Hendrix seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order
d enying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012) . The magistrate judge
recommended that relief be denied and advised Hendrix that failure
to fil e timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the
recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge ’ s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
of th e substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474
U.S. 140 (1985). Hendrix has waived appellate review by failin g to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny Hendrix’s motion to appoint counsel, deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are a dequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

**CERTIFICATION**

Inconnection with the periodic report of American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Nicole S.Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

|   | (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.  |

 

| Date:  August 13, 2003 | /s/ NICOLE S. WILLIAMS                         |   |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        |                                                |   |
|                        | **Nicole S. Williams Chief Financial Officer** |   |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of WVS Financial Corp. (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the
Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ David J. BursicDavid J. BursicPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: September 14, 2010



|      |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|----- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Note: |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be retained
by WVS Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of Report (date of earliest event reported): February 6, 2009
 ALLIANCE BANCSHARES CALIFORNIA
 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 California
    
    000-33455
    
    91-2124567(State or Other Jurisdiction 
of Incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 100 Corporate Pointe
Culver City, CA 90230
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 (310) 410-9281
(Registrants Telephone Number)
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 1.03
    
    Bankruptcy or Receivership.
   http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/alliance.html
 Item 8.01.
    
    Other Events.
  pari
passu pari passu
 2




---



##### 



February 12, 2009
    ALLIANCE BANCSHARES CALIFORNIABy:
    /s/ Daniel L. EricksonDaniel L. EricksonExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer 3
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-151 

LT Case No. 2022-SC-000520

_____________________________

ALICE SANFORD, 

Appellant,

v.

GOLDEN PAVERS, LLC C/O

CYNTIA TEIXEIRA SANTOS, 

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the County Court for Duval County. 

Gary Flower, Judge. 

Alice L. Sanford, Orange Park, pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellee. 

December 19, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

EDWARDS, C.J., WALLIS, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur. 
2 

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7127

PHILLIP E. BOOSE, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

D. DREW, Warden, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District 

Judge. (4:08-cv-01954-CMC) 

Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 29, 2008 

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Phillip E. Boose, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Phillip E. Boose, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and denying relief without prejudice on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Boose v. Drew, No. 4:08-

cv-01954-CMC (D.S.C. June 20, 2008). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5112 

To reduce, from 21 years of age to 18 years of age, the minimum age 

at which a person may obtain a handgun from a Federal firearms licensee. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2018 

Mr. MASSIE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To reduce, from 21 years of age to 18 years of age, the 

minimum age at which a person may obtain a handgun 

from a Federal firearms licensee. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Second Amendment 

5 For Every Registrable Voter Act’’ or the ‘‘SAFER Voter 

6 Act.’’ 

7 SEC. 2. MINIMUM AGE FOR OBTAINING A HANDGUN FROM 

8 A FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSEE. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 922(b)(1) of title 18, 

10 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘, and, if the 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5112 IH

1 firearm, or ammunition is other than a shotgun or rifle, 

2 or ammunition for a shotgun or rifle, to any individual 

3 who the licensee knows or has reasonable cause to believe 

4 is less than twenty-one years of age’’. 

5 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 922(c)(1) 

6 of such title is amended by striking ‘‘, in the case of any 

7 firearm other than a shotgun or a rifle, I am twenty-one 

8 years or more of age, or that, in the case of a shotgun 

9 or a rifle,’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
S.C. DHEC Avenal Comments: Docket # EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0438

Alan Hancock to: R9AirPermits, Shirley Rivera 04/12/2011 11:03 AM

Cc:

rcorey, "Elizabeth Basil", "James Little", "Myra C. Reece", "Renee 

Shealy", "Rhonda Banks Thompson", Beverly Banister, Gerardo 

Rios, Gregg Worley, Dave.Warner

History: This message has been forwarded.

1 attachment

SCDHEC_Avenal_Comments_20110412 20110412.pdf

Ms. Rivera,

Please find attached comments from the South Carolina Department of Health and 

Environmental Control (DHEC) Bureau of Air Quality on the March 2011 

Supplemental Statement of Basis for the Avenal Energy Project. 

Thank you. 

Alan M. Hancock

Regulation and SIP Management Section

Bureau of Air Quality

SC DHEC

2600 Bull St

Columbia, SC 29201

ph: (803) 898-4139

fax: (803) 898-4117

hancocam@dhec.sc.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Clive Read, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree; the jury was unable to reach a verdict with respect to an unrelated charge of murder in the second degree and the court, at defendant’s request, accepted a partial verdict. Defendant argues that the court erred in denying his pretrial motion to sever the murder count from the other two counts, arguing that proof of the assault would not be admissible on the murder charge. We disagree. Although no gun was recovered, the firearms examiner testified that the same gun was used in both incidents, several witnesses testified that defendant had been seen with a gun from which the bullet casings could have come, and the individuals involved were members of the same drug ring. Under these circumstances, we find that proof of the assault was probative on the contested issue of identity of the perpetrator of the murder *(see, People v Luke,*155 AD2d 890, *lv denied*75 NY2d 870).

We do not find defendant’s sentence to be harsh and excessive. Defendant’s two remaining contentions on appeal are unpreserved for our review and we decline to reach them in the interest of justice. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J. — Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick L. Alexander, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|November 14, 2002 |  |    
|----------------- |  | ---
|                  |  | By:

---

QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3582-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-3582-EM), dated August 30, 2022, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued December 18, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this emergency is closed effective November 28, 2022. 

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-00229 Filed 1-8-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Sam Azad 

·City Manager 

Mark Lovin 

Director of Aviation 

May 7, 2015 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer 

PUEBLO 

Chief, Essential Air Service & Domestic Analysis Division, X-53 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer; 

Pueblo Memorial Airport 

3120 I Bryan Circle, Ste. 200 

Pueblo, CO 81001 

Phone (719) 553-2760 

Fax (719) 553-2761 

Thank you for your response to our offer of2.5%, $44,411, for service years 2015-2016, Docket DOT-OST1999-6589, for Great Lakes Airlines to provide essential air service at Pueblo Memorial Airport, and in 

compliance with provisions of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and Reform Act of 

2012" (Public Law No. 112-95). 

As you may be aware, the City of Pueblo is an economically distressed community qualifying for reduced grant 

requirements for Airport Improvement Program grants. Specifically, the traditional grant match is 10%. 

However, in the case of the City of Pueblo that requirement is 5%. In addition, a review of relevant data 

indicates a median household income of $34,633, which is 47.7% of the average income of $66,215 statewide. 

Additionally, the unemployment rate in the City of Pueblo is 7.5% compared to the Colorado comparative nine 

city average of 5.62%. 

As a result of these statistics and in response to the counter offer, the City of Pueblo is prepared to contribute to 

the awarded airline subsidy 5% ofthe requested $1,776,448 assistance, or $88,822 for service years 2015-

2016. 

Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

SamAzad 

City Manager 

City of Pueblo