alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 


TRANSITION AGREEMENT


 


This TRANSITION AGREEMENT
(this “Agreement”) is entered into as of                             ,
2005 by and between BECKMAN COULTER, INC.,
a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and JOHN
P. WAREHAM, (“Mr. Wareham”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Mr. Wareham
is currently employed by and is the Chairman of the Board of Directors (the “Chairman”)
of the Company;


 


WHEREAS, Mr. Wareham
has stepped down as Chief Executive Officer of the Company as of February 21,
2005 and has indicated a desire to remain as Chairman of the Board until his
retirement from the Board April 7, 2005 (“Board Retirement Date”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company
desires to have the continued benefit of Mr. Wareham’s knowledge and expertise
through June 30, 2005, the date Mr. Wareham will retire from the Company (“Company
Retirement Date) and Mr. Wareham desires to provide such services as the
Company may reasonably require during such period of time from February 21,
2005 through the Company Retirement Date said period herein referred to as the “Transition
Period;”


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements set forth below, the
parties hereby agree as follows:


 


Compensation During the Transition Period.


 


(a)                                  Base
Salary and Bonus.  As compensation
for the performance by Mr. Wareham of his duties during the Transition Period,
the Company shall pay Mr. Wareham a base salary of $31,000 per each two-week
pay period and a prorated cash bonus for 2005 at previous target based on a
June 30, 2005 Company Retirement Date. 
Said prorated cash bonus to be paid six months after the Company
Retirement Date.  The Supplemental
Pension Plan will be amended to include the prorated cash bonus in the “final
average earnings” for Pension Plan benefits calculations.


 


(b)                                 Other
Benefits.  During the Transition
Period, Mr. Wareham shall be entitled to continue to participate in all
executive/employee benefits (including qualified and non-qualified pension
plans, and 401(k)), welfare, 2005 income tax preparation reimbursement,
vacation and other plans, practices, policies and programs and fringe benefits
in accordance with their terms.


 


	
   

  	
  BECKMAN COULTER, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
      /s/ Betty Woods

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  4/7/05

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ John P. Wareham

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  John P. Wareham

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  4/7/05

  	
   

  
					



 


1
Draft Agenda Nov. 8 Meeting of the Medium Voltage Transformer Negotiated Rulemaking Working Group

9:00 – 9:15 Welcome and Introductions

9:15 - 9:45 Overview of analysis and changes made in analysis in response to comments (clarifying questions/comments only)

9:45 – 10:00 Poles and Pads (EC 1) – Closure on whether there is need for new EC for DL 2 (round tanks) 10:00 – 11:00 Presentation of Proposals (Focus on EC 1,2) 11:00 - 11:30 Break; Caucuses 11:30 – 12:30 Presentation of Proposals on Liquid Immersed (cont’d) 12:30 – 1:30 Lunch 1:30 – 3:00 Discussion of proposals on Liquid Immersed (EC 1,2) 3:00 - 3:15 Break 3:15 - 4: 30 Presentation and Discussion of MVDT Proposals 4:30 - 5:00 Plan for treating sp ecial cases: vaults, networks, etc. 5:00 – 6:00 Wrap and plan for preparing for last meeting 6:00 Adjourn
##### 



Exhibit 32.1  Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the
Company.
 /s/ Willem M. SmitWillem M. SmitChief Executive OfficerPresident and DirectorDate: November 20, 2006
The Honorable William G. Cambridge, Chief Judge, United States District

1

Court for the District of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2320

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United

States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska

Daniel G. Erlewine, *

* {UNPUBLISHED}

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: October 1, 1997

 Filed: October 16,

1997

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, and McMILLIAN and

BEAM, 

Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Daniel G. Erlewine appeals from the final judgment

entered in the District Court for the District of

1

Nebraska after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to

distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine,

in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 846. The

district court sentenced Erlewine to 360 months
-2-

imprisonment and 10 years supervised release. Erlewine

challenges his sentence, and we affirm.
-3-

For reversal, Erlewine argues the district court

erred in applying a four-level role-in-the-offense

enhancement for being an organizer or leader of criminal

activity involving five or more participants, pursuant to

U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.1(a) (1995). At

sentencing, Erlewine argued he was just a dealer and did

not exercise control over any of his customers. A

government witness, however, testified that Erlewine had

received kilogram-sized quantities of cocaine, which he

divided for distribution to nine different people; that

Erlewine set the prices for the cocaine he supplied and

expected a fifty percent profit on each kilogram he sold;

and that the amount of cocaine Erlewine fronted depended

on how quickly his customers returned the sales proceeds.

Based on this testimony, we conclude that the

district court did not clearly err in determining

Erlewine was an organizer or leader pursuant to

Guidelines § 3B1.1(a). See United States v. Johnson, 47

F.3d 272, 277 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review; no

clear error in applying Guidelines § 3B1.1(a) enhancement

where defendant was, inter alia, instrumental in

receiving, paying for, and organizing for distribution

large quantities of cocaine); U.S. Sentencing Guidelines

Manual § 3B1.1(a) application note 4 (1995) (court should

consider, among other things, defendant&s decision-making

authority and degree of participation in planning

offense, whether defendant recruited accomplices, whether

defendant claimed greater profit from crime, and

defendant&s control and authority over others).

A true copy.
-4-

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 492 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 492

 To ensure that any authority of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund to 
borrow amounts from the Treasury is used only to pay mortgage insurance 
                                claims.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2017

 Mr. Capuano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure that any authority of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund to 
borrow amounts from the Treasury is used only to pay mortgage insurance 
                                claims.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``End Unnecessary Borrowing Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF BORROWING AUTHORITY.

    Paragraph (2) of section 205(f) of the National Housing Act (12 
U.S.C. 1711(f)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(2)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
            ``(B) Subparagraph (A) may not be construed to authorize or 
        require the Secretary to borrow any amounts to comply with the 
        capital ratio requirement under such subparagraph.
            ``(C) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 
        authority of the Secretary under this Act or otherwise to 
        borrow amounts from the Treasury of the United States for the 
        Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund may be used only to the extent 
        necessary to pay claims on mortgage insurance that is an 
        obligation of such Fund.''.
                                 <all>
```
U . S . Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation

Dear Mr. Sgalitzer: Assostant Secretary 

### JUN 18 

## 2014 1 200 New Jersey Ave .• S E Washongton. DC 20590

Thank yo u for yo ur e-mail to Secretary Foxx regarding the application of No rweg i an Air Inte rnational Limited (NA I) for authority to conduct U . S. services. I am responding on behalf of the Secretary. G iven that a number of interes ted partie s hav e filed re s p o n sive pl eadi n gs to NA I' s application and thi s matter i s currently pending before th e Departm ent , I am s ure yo u und e rstand that I canno t comment on the merit s ofNAI's ap plication . I assure you , however, that we w ill give fu ll and careful cons ideration to a ll of the p leadings filed on t h e record before we reach a determinat ion in this matt e r. As is o ur standard pr ac tic e , I am placing a copy of your e-mail and my response in Docket DOT
OST-20 1 3 -0 204, as a co nt act o ut side the reco rd of thi s case. You may track the progress ofthis case and view the pub li cly ava il ab le documents fil e d in th e docket by access in g the Federa l D oc ket Managemen t System at www. r eg ul a tion s.gov a nd searc hin g for Do cket DOT-OST
- 20 1 3 -0 204. I hope this inf ormati o n is helpfu l.



### 510-140612-001 Sincere ly yo ur s,

Ass istant Sec retary fo r A v iat i on and Internatio n a l Affairs

### Valaitis, Ada 

# (osn From: Sent: To: Subject: Secretary Foxx, Nick Sgalitzer < sgalitzern@gmail.com> Thursday , June 12, 2014 5 : 13 AM Anthony Foxx (OSD Please Deny Norwegian International Airlines
Regarding the DOT making a mistake of epic and irreversible proportions by approving Norwegian International Airlines foreign air carrier permit application. The sham airline is skirting several labor & safety rules and offers consumers a small benifit of perhaps lower Trans Atlantic airfare. The negative aspects are too numerous to mention . The most devastating of which include the continued threat to our Airlines, labor law violations & safety . Our airlines are a huge part of our economy and represent millions of good jobs in this country . Not supporting the sham of Norwegian International Airlines is what's best for our economy, safety & jobs! Respectfully, N i cholas Sgalitzer

1 

# s 10-140612-001 

## •
### SERVED: June 10, 2014 US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

IN THE MATTER OF MARTINAIRE AVIATION, LLC FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0040

ORDER ON RESPONDENT'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE Martinaire Aviation (hereinafter "Respondent") has filed Motions in Limine dated May 14, 2014. The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Agency") has filed a Response. Respondent thereafter filed a Rebuttal. The matters will be considered during deliberations onthe issues under consideration.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative LawJudge Attachment

- Service List !. -c >**~"** _};:;

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence_Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1 

### ONE COPY Michael L. 

### Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel 

### Michael L. 

### Dworkin and Associates Law Offices 465 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, CA 94104-1808 TEL: 415-421-2500 FAX: 415-421-2560 James Archier, Complainant's Counsel 

### Agency Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Southwest Region Federal Aviation Administration 2601 Meacham Blvd., Suite 6E Fort Worth, TX 76137 TEL: 817-222-5074 FAX: 817-222-5092 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) · Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0040 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5633]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Will the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. 
Wittman) come forward and lead the House in the Pledge of Allegiance.
  Mr. WITTMAN led the Pledge of Allegiance as follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of 
     America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation 
     under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

                          ____________________
```
AFS-13-239-E

March 25, 2013

 Exemption No. 10727

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0182

Ms. Heather Doyon

Parent of Max Doyon

5960 S. Bryan

White Lake, MI 48383

Dear Ms. Doyon:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated February 18, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Max Doyon for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Max to exceed the 

specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by 

AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States 

(U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Max.
2

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using 

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security 

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the 

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by 

persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the

situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Max Doyon exemption from 

14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating 

under part 121 while Max is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from

14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Max to exceed the specified 

weight limit for an FAA-approved CRS during use of that CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Max’s parents or a 

caregiver accompanying him. Max Doyon may only occupy a passenger seat with no 

passenger seated behind him. In addition, Max’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this 

exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours 

before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Deputy Director, Flight Standards

 Service

Enclosure
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RODERICK MULLINS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2565

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed January 4, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Polk County; William D. Sites, 

Judge.

Roderick Mullins, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 2005); Bizzell v. State, 

912 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Enriquez v. State, 885 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 

2004). 

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               EMPLOYMENT LETTER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                          Private & Confidential

Parties

The following entities will be party to the Contract:

a.    General Components Inc, a Cayman Island registered company (referred to
      herein as the "GCI"):

b.    Mr Simon Mu ("Mr Mu").

Offered Position

GCI has the pleasure of offering Mr. Mu the position of CEO -- GCI. Mr. Mu will
report to the Board of Directors.

Compensation

Monthly after tax(s) salary of USD 10,000 ( USD Ten Thousand Only), will be
paid to Mr. Mu for the services he renders.

Annual performance bonus is 10% of audited after-tax operating profit of China
Operation (referred herein as "ATP") calculated under International Accounting
Standards_ The bonus will be granted on pro-rata basis if either Party
terminates the contract during the financial year.

Profit Sharing Scheme:

10% of ATP will be shared among the approved management team of not more than 6
individuals including the Mr Mu, CEO of GCI. Mr Mu entitles to not more than 30%
of the total approved annual performance bonus.

Company Car

Mr Mu entitles to the provision of company car.

Termination

Either party should serve the other a three-month's notice to termination the
employment contract during the first sir months' of services and six months'
notice from the seventh month onwards.


<PAGE>

Other Conditions

Management Service Contracts. Mr. Mu would be expected to sign management
agreements setting out their respective duties, certain performance goals, and
providing for protection of GCI in areas of non-competition and non-solicitation
of employees.


                                    Sincerely,

                                    /s/ Dan Lee
                                    ---------------------------------
                                    Dan Lee
                                    on behalf General Components Inc.


A G R E E D


/s/ Simon Mu
---------------------------------
Simon Mu
Date:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 11, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 170 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents                           ( print page 1952)                        are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-160, CP2024-166.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-00380 Filed 1-10-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark A. Herpich, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Mark A. Herpich     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
| Mark A. Herpich         |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| August 13, 2004         |

 

----