alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4946 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4946

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  1075 North Tustin Street in Orange, California, as the ``Specialist 
                     Trevor A. Win'E Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SPECIALIST TREVOR A. WIN'E POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1075 North Tustin Street in Orange, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Specialist Trevor A. Win'E Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Trevor A. Win'E Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Industry and Security

The Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee (SITAC) will meet on Tuesday, January 30, 2024, 9:30 a.m., (Pacific standard time) at the SPIE Photonics West 2023, at the InterContinental Hotel San Francisco, 888 Howard Street, in the Fremont Room (Level 5), San Francisco, CA 94103. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable to sensors and instrumentation equipment and technology. The purpose of the meeting is to have Committee members and U.S. Government representatives mutually review updated technical data and policy-driving information that has been gathered.

## Agenda

### Open Session

1. Welcome and Introductions

2. Remarks from the Bureau of Industry and Security Management

3. Industry Presentations

4. New Business

                    To join the conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at                     *Yvette.Springer@bis.doc.gov*                     no later than January 23, 2024.                

A limited number of seats will be available during the public session of the meeting.

Reservations are not accepted. To the extent that time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. The public may submit written statements at any time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to the Committee members, the Committee suggests that the materials be forwarded before the meeting to Ms. Springer.

For more information contact Ms. Springer via email.

Yvette Springer,

Committee Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2024-00422 Filed 1-10-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P
Exhibit 32.1
          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Y-Tel  International,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Steve
Lipman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

           1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of
                operations of the Company.

Dated: August 15, 2005


/s/ Steve Lipman
-----------------
Steve Lipman, President and CEO


                                     32.1-1
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1592]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   HONORING CITY MANAGER MARIA DADIAN

                                  _____
                                 

                         HON. LINDA T. SANCHEZ

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Ms. LINDA T. SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to 
recognize Maria Dadian and her 18 years of public service to the people 
of Southern California.
  Maria's devotion to public service is long-standing. In 1975, Maria 
began her career in municipal government working for the City of South 
El Monte. She later accepted the position of Parks and Recreation 
Director with the City of Hawaiian Gardens, and after four years was 
promoted to Assistant to the City Administrator. Following her 11 years 
of continuous service to Hawaiian Gardens, she was named interim 
Executive Director of the Coalition for Youth Development, the city's 
newly established non-profit organization. During her municipal career 
she has been contracted by both public entities and private businesses 
to organize and implement public safety and recreation programs.
  Since joining the City of Artesia management team in 1994, Maria has 
worked tirelessly to ensure Artesia remains safe for its residents and 
economically vibrant for its business community. During her time as 
Assistant City Manager, Maria oversaw the City's Public Safety 
programs, Capital Projects, Community Development projects, and grant 
program. On top of that, Maria also steered Artesia's Parks and 
Recreation and Public Works departments. On November 20, 2000, she was 
appointed City Manager, and redoubled her efforts to serve the citizens 
and businesses of Artesia.
  Over the years, Maria never stopped working to improve Artesia 
through redevelopment, encouraging private sector investment, and 
diversifying and expanding Artesia's economic base. As a result, 
Artesia flourished under Maria's tenure. This includes an historic 
district renovation and restoration project, as well as numerous 
projects devoted to public infrastructure and facilities, downtown 
revitalization, and developmental and housing assistance. In short, 
Artesia has seen a renaissance with Maria as City Manager.
  I commend Maria Dadian for her many years of outstanding public 
service and dedication to the City of Artesia and the community. We 
need more public servants like Maria Dadian. Artesia would not be the 
community it is today without her.

                          ____________________
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 9 (Friday, January 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 2237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00543]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[245A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]


Indian Gaming; Approval by Operation of Law of Amendment to Class 
III Tribal-State Gaming Compact (Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians & 
State of California)

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes the approval by operation of law of an 
amendment to the Tribal-State Gaming Compact between the Ewiiaapaayp 
Band of Kumeyaay Indians and the State of California governing Class 
III gaming for the Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians in the State of 
California.

DATES: The Amendment takes effect on January 12, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, 25 
U.S.C. 2701 et seq., (IGRA) provides the Secretary of the Interior 
(Secretary) with 45 days to review and approve or disapprove the 
Tribal-State compact governing the conduct of Class III gaming activity 
on the Tribe's Indian lands. See 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(8). If the Secretary 
does not approve or disapprove a Tribal-State compact within the 45 
days, IGRA provides the Tribal-State compact is considered to have been 
approved by the Secretary but only to the extent the compact is 
consistent with IGRA. See 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)(C). The IGRA also 
requires the Secretary of the Interior to publish in the Federal 
Register notice of the approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose 
of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. See 25 
U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)(D). The Department's regulations at 25 CFR 293.4 
require all compacts and amendments to be reviewed and approved by the 
Secretary prior to taking effect. The Secretary took no action on the 
Compact amendment between the Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians and 
the State of California, within the 45-day statutory review period. 
Therefore, the Compact amendment is considered to have been approved, 
but only to the extent it is consistent with IGRA. See 25 U.S.C. 
2710(d)(8)(C).

Bryan Newland,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2024-00543 Filed 1-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
**Order of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2009 – infeurope v Commission**

**(Case T-176/08)**

Action for declaration of failure to act, for annulment and for damages – Public service contracts – Call for tenders concerning the maintenance of OHIM’s computer systems – Administrative appeal before the Commission – Implied Commission decision to dismiss – New claims – Connection between the action for a declaration of failure to act and the action for damages – Manifest inadmissibility

1.                     *Actions for failure to act – Failure to act – Definition – Administrative action against a measure of the President of the
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market in the context of the awarding of public contracts – Implied rejection decision
by the Commission – Not included – Action for failure to act inadmissible (Art. 232 EC; Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 118)
(see paras 36-40)*

2.                     *Procedure – Subject-matter of the dispute – Alteration once proceedings have been started (Rules of Procedure of the Court
of First Instance, Art. 48(2)) (see para. 42)*

3.                     *Actions for damages – Autonomy in relation to action for annulment and action for failure to act – Manifest inadmissibility
of actions for annulment and for failure to act – Compensation claim closely linked to the action for a declaration of failure
to act – Inadmissibility (Art. 288, second para., EC) (see paras 46-48)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | First, application for a declaration that the Commission failed to act in that it unlawfully failed to annul the decision to award framework contracts under the tendering procedure AO/042/05 of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) for software maintenance relating to OHIM core business systems on trade marks and designs, and to terminate the specific contracts concluded under those framework contracts and, in the alternative, application for annulment of the alleged implied decision of the Commission to dismiss the applicant’s administrative appeal of 2 December 2007 in the context of that tendering procedure and, secondly, application for compensation for the harm allegedly suffered as a result of the alleged unlawful omissions on the part of the Commission. |

**Operative part**

1.     The action is dismissed.

2.     infeurope is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission.

3.     It is not necessary to rule on the application to intervene submitted by European Dynamics SA.

4.     infeurope, the Commission and European Dynamics are ordered to bear their own costs in connection with the application to
intervene.
### EPA APPROVED IDAHO STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO THE HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Idaho Code containing the General Laws of Idaho Annotated, Title 39, Chapter 44, “Hazardous Waste Management”, published by the Michie Company, Law Publishers in 2002

.

State Citation Description Page 39-4402 Legislative findings and purposes. 2
39-4403 (except 39-4403(6)&(14)) Definitions (except for “Gate ton” and “PCB”) 3-5

39-4408(1)-(3) Unauthorized treatment, st orage, release, use or disposal of hazardous waste prohibited. 8

39-4409(1) (except fourth and fifth sentences) Permit required for hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal facilities. 8

39-4409(2), first sentence Interim status granted by RCRA or a permit issued by the U.S. EPA prior to the date that the State program is authorized. 8-9

39-4409(4) (except first sentence) Permit review every 5 years. 9

39-4409(5) Corrective action required for permits issued after effective date of this provision. 9

39-4409(6) Permit may be revoked. 10 39-4409(7) Department may issue a variance from the requirements of the rules and regulations. 10

39-4409(8) Department may issue a research, development, and demonstration permit. 10

39-4411(2) Reporting requirements for generators, transporters, and owners and operators of treatment, storage and disposal facilities. 13

39-4411(4) Generator required to submit an annual written report to the Department. 13

39-4411(5) Operator of hazardous wast e disposal facility required to submit an annual report to the Department. 13

39-4423 (except 39-4423(3)(a)&(b)) Disposal of restricted hazardous wastes prohibited. 22

39-4424 Disposal of manifested waste. 23

### EPA APPROVED IDAHO STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO THE HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Idaho Code containing the General Laws of Idaho Annotated, Title 39, Chapter 58, “Hazardous Waste Facility Siting”, published by the Michie Company, Law Publishers in 2002

.

State Citation Description Page 39-5802 Legislative intent. 86-87
39-5803 Definitions 87-88 39-5808 Requirement of a site li cense for a commercial hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility, or any on-site disposal facility. 91

39-5811 Siting license not require d for hazardous waste disposal, treatment, or storage facility in existence on July 1, 1985; siting license required for expansion, enlargement, or alteration of such facilities. 91

39-5813(1) Information requirements for the application. 93 39-5818(2) Opportunity for the regulated community to designate information as confidential. 97
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN E. ERICKSON and SHELLEY A.

ERICKSON,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 and

SHELLEY’S TOTAL BODY WORKS

DAY SPA/SHELLEY’S SUNTAN

PARLOR, a sole proprietorship,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

LONG BEACH MORTGAGE CO; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-35313

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-01423-MJP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Marsha J. Pechman, Chief Judge, Presiding

FILED

MAY 29 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

2 11-35313

Submitted May 15, 2012** 

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

John E. and Shelley A. Erickson appeal pro se from the district court’s

summary judgment in their action arising from their home loan. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Olsen v. Idaho State Bd.

of Med., 363 F.3d 916, 922 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for the reasons stated

in its order entered on March 2, 2011. 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the Ericksons’

motion for reconsideration because the Ericksons failed to show grounds

warranting reconsideration. See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cnty., Or. v.

ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of

review and grounds for reconsideration).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the Ericksons’

motions for recusal. See United States v. Studley, 783 F.2d 934, 939-40 (9th Cir.

1986) (setting forth standard of review and noting that a litigant’s threats to sue a

judge are not grounds for recusal).
3 11-35313

The Ericksons’ remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, nor arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).

The Ericksons’ motion to file an oversized reply brief is granted, and the

Clerk is directed to file the reply brief received on October 28, 2011. To the extent

the Ericksons’ filings seek to supplement the record with documents that were not

presented to the district court, the request is denied.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.11

                                     1998
                          INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
                                        



Purpose
-------

This plan is designed to reward key members of DM Management for their
contribution toward the attainment of the company's financial goals in 1998.


Participation
-------------

This plan is restricted to key management personnel whose decisions have a
measurable impact on the financial goals of the company.  Participation in the
plan and assignment of bonus percentages is made either by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors in the case of executive officers or by the
President of the company in the case of everyone else.   The Compensation
Committee and the President may also award additional bonuses at their
discretion.


Eligibility to Receive Bonus Payment
------------------------------------

Bonus plan participants will be eligible to receive their bonus payment if the
company meets or exceeds its planned earnings goals for the performance period.
The planned earnings goal is defined as operating income (i.e. earnings before
interest and taxes) as set forth in the company's financial plan.


Calculation of Bonus Payment
----------------------------

To determine the amount of bonus to be paid to an individual, simply multiply
the individuals bonus percentage by the individuals base salary earnings for the
performance period.


Performance Period
------------------

This plan pertains to the fiscal year ending December 26, 1998.  For measurement
purposes the fiscal year will be divided into two seasonal performance periods:
        .  spring  December 28, 1997 to June 27, 1998
        .  fall  June 28, 1998 to December 26, 1998


Payments
--------

Bonus payments will be made as soon as possible after the close of the
performance period (i.e. season).
<PAGE>
 
Page 2
1998 Incentive Compensation Plan



Example
-------

Assume:  Base annual salary of $50,000 and a bonus percentage of 10%

Case 1:  The company meets the financial plan for both seasons:
 
                    Base Salary          Bonus %         Bonus
                    -----------          -------         ------
     Spring             $25,000             10%          $2,500
     Fall               $25,000             10%          $2,500
                        -------                          ------
 
     Fiscal 1998        $50,000                          $5,000
                        -------                          ------
 
Case 2:   The company meets the spring financial plan but not the fall
          financial plan:
 
                    Base Salary          Bonus %         Bonus
                    -----------          -------         ------
     Spring             $25,000             10%          $2,500
     Fall               $25,000             --               --
                        -------                          ------

     Fiscal 1998        $50,000                          $2,500
                        -------                          ------
Page 1 of 1 

United States Environmental Protection OMB Approval 2070-174 

Agency Washington, D.C. 20460 

REQUIREMENTS STATUS AND REGISTRANT'S RESPONSE 

. Please read carefully the attached instructions and supply the information requested on this form. 

2. Case# and Name 3. Date and Type of DCI and Number 

4058 Iron salts 

Chemical# and Name 050507 

Ferrous sulfate monohydrate 

e 

nt Protection Data Requirements (Conventional 

nt toxicity, Tier 1 (seeding emergence) (1 ,3 ,4) 

nt toxicity, Tier 1 (vegetative vigor) (5 ,6 ,7 ,8) 

mistry Data Requirements (Conventional 

orption 

d Aquatic Nontarget Organisms Data 

 (Conventional Chemical) 

te contact toxicity (2) 

p 

R Progress 

0 Reports T 0 

L 1 2 3 

N 

N 

N N 

6. Use 

Pattern 

c c c 

c 

00-MMM-YYYY 

GENERIC 

10 # GDCI-050507-NNNNN 

7. Test 

Substance 

TEP 

TEP 

PAl; TGAI 

TGAI 

8. Time 

Frame 

(Months) 

12 12 

8 

12 

nts made on this form and all attachments are true, accurate, and complete. I acknowledge that any 11. Date 

y be punishable by fine, imprisonment or both under applicable law 

 Representative 

13. Phone Number 

9. Registrant 

Response 
United States Environmental Protection 

Agency Washington, D.C. 20460 

FOOTNOTES AND KEY DEFINITIONS FOR GUIDELINE REQUIREMENTS 

Case# and Name: 4058 Iron salts 

DCI Number: GDCI-050507-NNNNN 

Technical Grade of the Active Ingredient; TEP =Typical End Use Product [TEP]; TGAI =Technical Grade Active Ingredient [TGAI] 

eferenced in column two (5. Study File) of the REQUIREMENTS STATUS AND REGISTRANT'S RESPONSE form.] 

ential uses. 

Page 1 of 1 

red to support all outdoor end-use product uses including turf. Data are generally not required to support end use products in the form of a gas, a highly volatile 

or a highly corrosive material. 

sticide treatments such as bait boxes and pheromone traps unless adverse effects reports are received by the Agency. 

ide uses except for known phytotoxicants such as herbicides, desiccants. defoliants, and plant growth regulators. 

ntial uses. 

ticide treatments such as bait boxes and pheromone traps unless adverse effects reports are received by the Agency. 

ide uses except for known phytotoxicants such as herbicides, desiccants, defoliants, and plant growth regulators. 

nular formulations. May be requested on a case-by-case basis.