alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008142EN.01001902.xml

| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/19

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 (Commercial Court No 1), Spain lodged on 9 April 2008 — Finn Mejnertsen v Betina Mandal Barsoe

(Case C-148/08)

(2008/C 142/31)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 (Commercial Court No 1), Spain

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Finn Mejnertsen

Applicant:

Defendant: Betina Mandal Barsoe

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | For the purposes of Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty of European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, should Denmark be considered to be a Member State within the meaning of Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 (1) on insolvency proceedings? |
| --- | --- |

1.

For the purposes of Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty of European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, should Denmark be considered to be a Member State within the meaning of Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 (1) on insolvency proceedings?

1

| 2. | Does the fact that that Regulation is subject to that Protocol mean that that Regulation does not form part of the body of Community law in that country? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the fact that that Regulation is subject to that Protocol mean that that Regulation does not form part of the body of Community law in that country?

| 3. | Does the fact that Regulation No 1346/2000 is not binding on and is not applicable in Denmark mean that other Member States are not to apply that Regulation in respect of the recognition and enforcement of judicial declarations of insolvency handed down in that country, or, on the other hand, that other Member States are obliged, unless they have made derogations, to apply that Regulation when the judicial declaration of insolvency is handed down in Denmark and is presented for recognition and enforcement in other Member States, in particular, in Spain? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does the fact that Regulation No 1346/2000 is not binding on and is not applicable in Denmark mean that other Member States are not to apply that Regulation in respect of the recognition and enforcement of judicial declarations of insolvency handed down in that country, or, on the other hand, that other Member States are obliged, unless they have made derogations, to apply that Regulation when the judicial declaration of insolvency is handed down in Denmark and is presented for recognition and enforcement in other Member States, in particular, in Spain?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of the Council, of 29 May 2000 (OJ L 160, p. 1).

1

---
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 1stConstitution Bancorp
(the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                                      
|----------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|ROBERT F. MANGANO
|Name:             |  | Robert F. Mangano                    
|Title:            |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:             |  | August 11, 2004                      
|                 
|JOSEPH M. REARDON
|Name:             |  | Joseph M. Reardon                    
|Title:            |  | Senior Vice President and Treasurer  
|Date:             |  | August 11, 2004
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4925 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 11, 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT 

To require the Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration to implement certain recommendations for management and collection of railroad safety data. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4925 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FRA Safety Data Im3 provement Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND COL5 LECTION OF RAILROAD SAFETY DATA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Federal 

7 Railroad Administration shall develop a plan, and a 

8 timeline to carry out such plan, to implement the rec9 ommendations from the Inspector General Report No. 

10 ST2017045 of the Department of Transportation, issued 

11 on May 3, 2017, to the greatest extent possible, to improve 

12 the Federal Railroad Administration’s management and 

13 collection of railroad safety data. 

14 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.— 

15 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days 

16 after date of enactment of this Act, the Adminis17 trator shall submit the plan and timeline developed 

18 under subsection (a) to the Committee on Transpor19 tation and Infrastructure of the House of Represent20 atives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

21 and Transportation of the Senate. 

22 (2) REPORT.—The Administrator shall report 

23 annually to the committees on the implementation of 

24 such plan until implementation is complete. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4925 RFS

1 SEC. 3. NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED. 

2 No additional funds are authorized to carry out the 

3 requirements of this Act. Such requirements shall be car4 ried out using amounts otherwise authorized. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 10, 2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 21-272

COREY ALAN RUBIN and DON 

HAUTH,

Plaintiffs/Appellees,

-vsBRENT E. HUGHES and GRACE 

HUGHES, husband and wife, 

Defendants/Appellants.

ORDER GRANTING 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

OPENING BRIEF

Appellants Brent E. Hughes and Grace Hughes having filed an Unopposed 

Motion for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief, and good cause appearing 

therefor;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellants’ Opening Brief shall be filed on 

or before September 29, 2021. 

DATED this ______ day of August, 2021.

______________________________

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 18 2021

08/18/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0272
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6868

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT FREDRICK COBBS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District

Judge. (CR-95-3, CA-97-107-4)

Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 14, 1997

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcia Gail Shein, LAW OFFICE OF MARCIA G. SHEIN, P.C., Atlanta,

Georgia, for Appellant. Deborah Ann Ausburn, Assistant United

States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Cobb, Nos. CR-95-3; CA-97-107-4 (W.D.N.C.

May 16, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION OF OFFICER PER SECTION 906


EX-32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Timeline, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles R. Osenbaugh, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ Charles R. Osenbaugh
Date:  June 26, 2006
 Charles R. Osenbaugh,
 President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6473]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  ADJOURNMENT UNTIL 9:30 A.M. TOMORROW

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, if there is no further business to come 
before the Senate, I ask unanimous consent that it adjourn under the 
previous order.
  There being no objection, the Senate, at 7:25 p.m., adjourned until 
Thursday, September 20, 2012, at 9:30 a.m.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Lawson Software, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, HarryDebes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ HARRY DEBES                                     |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Harry  Debes*President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|   |                                                |
|   | October 10,  2005                              |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 30, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-41291 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARRICK HILLARD, also known as Pie, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:01-CR-33-1

-------------------- Before JOLLY, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Arrick Hillard appeals his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. Hillard argues that the magistrate judge committed reversible error at the rearraignment proceedings by failing to 1) inform him that he had the right to plead not guilty or to persist in his not-guilty plea, 2) advise him of the effects of supervised release, and 3) fully explain the nature of the conspiracy charge. HillardNo. 02-41291 -2- also contends that the magistrate judge erred in delegating and permitting the Government to conduct certain F ED . R. C RIM . P. 11 admonishments, and he asserts that there was an insufficient factual basis for his plea. Hillard argues that the magistrate judge’s flawed compliance with the requirements of F ED . R. C RIM . P. 11 renders his guilty plea involuntarily made. Hillard further asserts that his case should be remanded to the district court for disposition of his outstanding pro se motion to withdraw his guilty plea, which Hillard filed subsequent to his rearraignment and prior to his sentencing. We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and hold that the magistrate judge’s alleged F ED . R. C RIM . P. 11 errors/omissions do not rise to the level of plain error.
See United States v. Vonn , 122 S. Ct. 1043, 1046 (2002); United States v. Reyes , 300 F.3d 555, 558 (5th Cir. 2002); United States v. Marek , 238 F.3d 310, 315 (5th Cir.)(en banc), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 813 (2001); United States v. Cuevas-Andrade , 232 F.3d 440, 444 (5th Cir. 2000). Because Hillard was represented by counsel during the criminal proceedings, his pro se letter to withdraw his guilty plea was an unauthorized motion that the district court was permitted to ignore. See United States v. Ogbonna , 184 F.3d 447, 449 & n.1 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Early , 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994).
AFFIRMED.
#### Robert S. LEE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 11546.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Oct. 9, 1939.

Warren C. Lee, of Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant.

Maurice M. Milligan, U. S. Atty., and Randall Wilson, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Kansas City, Mo.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed without costs to either party in this court on motion of appellant.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28863]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP24-262-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreements 
Update (Pioneer Jan 2024) to be effective 1/1/2024.
    Filed Date: 12/22/23.
    Accession Number: 20231222-5287.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/24.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is 
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#77382727371112051459101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b3fce3e3f3d5d6c1d09dd4dcc5">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 26, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-28863 Filed 1-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

August 17, 2012

MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with the National Automobile Deal ers Association to discuss the EPA/NHTSA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Greenho use Gas and CAFE Standards for Model Year 2017-2025 Light-Duty Vehicles

FROM: William Charmley, US EPA

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799

This memo documents a meeting held on January 3, 20 12 between representatives of the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA), and EPA to discuss the EPA/NHTSA Joint Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Greenhouse Gas an d CAFE Standards for Model Year 2017- 2025 Light-Duty Vehicles. This meeting took place in Washington, D.C., and a number of EPA representatives participated by video conference.

The meeting attendees included from NADA: Andy Koblenz, VP and General Counsel Dave Regan, VP of the Legislative Affairs Group Doug Greenhaus, Director of Environment, Health and Safety, Regulatory Affairs Group.

Representatives for EPA included Margo Oge, Chet Fr ance, and Bill Charmley.

During this meeting NADA expressed their concerns w ith a number of elements of the NPRM, in particular the long-time frame over which the pr oposed standards would take effect (model years 2017-2025) and that the NPRM was initiated in a short period of time after the 2012-2016 rulemaking was finalized. NADA expressed support f or a single national program, and they expressed support for the continuation of the footp rint-based attribute for the standards. NADA stated that they would submit additional details in their written comments on the proposal, and they noted that NADA had formally requested an exte nsion of the public comment period for the proposal. NADA also stated that they would partici pate in each of the public hearings scheduled for the proposal.
---

---

EXHIBIT 12.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Elbit Vision Systems Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Gal,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the           Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|July 15, 2007 |  | /s/ David GalDavid GalChief Executive Officer
|------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



---

---
Attachment I:

Partner Annual Assessment Form

–

Cost Savings

- Revenue
HOULIHAN'S RESTAURANTS, INC.
                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                December 30, 199


Houlihan's of Union Station, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Houlihan's of Farmingdale, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Darryl's of St. Louis County, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Darryl's of Kissimmee, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Darryl's of Overland Park, Inc., a Kansas corporation

Sam Wilson's/Kansas, Inc., a Kansas corporation

S & H Beverage Co., Inc., a Texas corporation

Houlihan's/Maryland, Inc., a Maryland corporation

Houlihan's/Milwaukee, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation

Houlihan's/Bergen County, Inc., a New Jersey corporation

Houlihan's/San Francisco, Inc., a California corporation

Houlihan's of Indianapolis, Inc., an Indiana corporation

Houlihan's of California, Inc., a California corporation

G/R Texas Enterprises, Inc., a Texas corporation

Restaurant Supply, Inc., a Missouri corporation

Red Steer, Inc., a Missouri corporation
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.10




EXPERT CONSENT
 I, J. Morton Shannon, do hereby consent to (i) the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled “Prairie Creek Property Northwest Territories, Canada Technical Report for Canadian Zinc Corporation” with an effective date of June 15, 2012 and other mineral resource and reserve information pertaining to the Prairie Creek Property in the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) for the year ended December 31, 2013 of Canadian Zinc Corporation (the “Company”) and (ii) the use of my name in the AIF, and the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto incorporating by reference the Company’s AIF.
 Dated this 20thday of March, 2014.
 /s/ J. Morton Shannon
 Name: J. Morton Shannon, P. Geo.
##### 



Exhibit 99.3
 
 Contacts:
    
    Commerce Energy Group, Inc.Linda AmesCorporate Communications714-259-2539lames@CommerceEnergy.comPondelWilkinson Inc.Robert Jaffe/Angie Chen310-279-5980rjaffe@pondel.com / achen@pondel.com
 Commerce Energy Names Interim Chief Financial Officer
 COSTA MESA, CA July 27, 2007




---



##### 



About Commerce Energy Group, Inc.
  www.CommerceEnergy.com
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bernard, Allan & Edwards, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the "Report"),
I, Michael McLaughlin, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18  U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.

/s/    Michael McLaughlin
Michael McLaughlin
President
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)

August 12, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version
of this written statement has been  provided to the Company and will be
retained  by the  Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.