alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ex parte JEFFERSON.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 24, 1939.

*472Thomas Jefferson, in pro. per.

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner, Thomas Jefferson, now incarcerated in the Washington State Prison at Walla Walla, Washington, petitions for a writ of habeas corpus and for leave to proceed on the application in forma pauperis. The application is entitled in the Circuit Court of the United States in and for the Ninth Circuit. It is addressed “To the Honorable Senior Judge of the above titled Court,” and prays that a writ of habeas corpus be granted directed to the Superintendent of the Washington State Prison commanding him “to produce the person of the Petitioner before the District Court of the United States, Eastern District of Washington, Southern Division, presided over by any judge other than the Hon. Stanley Webster, at a time and a place to be specified therein, there to do and receive what shall then be said concerning the said Thomas Jefferson, together with the time and the cause of his detention, and said writ, and that the said Thomas Jefferson be granted his release, in conformity with law and justice.” Immediately under the title of the petition is the statement, “Application to the above titled court, under the authority of Sec. 463, Title 28, Par. A. U.S.C.” This section and subsection provide in part, “A circuit judge shall have the same power to grant writs of habeas corpus within his circuit that a district judge has within his district.” 28 U.S.C.A. § 463(a). In view of the fact that the Circuit Court of Appeals has no authority to grant a writ of habeas corpus except in aid of its appellate jurisdiction and that no such limitation is imposed upon a circuit judge (De Maurez v. Swope, 9 Cir., 100 F.2d 530), I assume that a fair construction of the petition is that it is addressed to the Senior Circuit Judge and not the Court.

The petitioner alleges that he is imprisoned in pursuance of a judgment and sentence of a Superior Court of the State of Washington for an alleged violation of the laws of the state. Pie alleges that he was deprived of his right to appeal to the state Supreme Court because of the conduct of the officers of the state; that he has applied to the courts of the State of Washington for a writ of habeas corpus and that application was denied by the Supreme Court of the state. Subsequently, he applied to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington and that application was denied. Assuming that the appellant has exhausted his remedies in the state courts, as he alleges, it does not follow that a United States District Judge or a United States Circuit Judge should entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The application should be made- to the Supreme Court of the United States unless there are exceptional circumstances which justify or require the issuance of a writ by the lower federal court judges. Ex parte Penney, 9 Cir., 103 F.2d 27; Ex parte Melendez, 9 Cir., 98 F.2d 791.

Petition denied.
|   | (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|   | (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|   Date: June 24, 2010 |   |                                             |   |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                            |   | /s/ Marcel Noordeloos                            |   |   |
|                            |   | Marcel NoordeloosInterim Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME OF ARM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC'S FORM 10K FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         5,812,330
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      31,745
<MORTGAGE>                                      14,554
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               5,287,014
<CASH>                                         525,316
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         125,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,786,264
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              6,600,498
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 38,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     75,000
<COMMON>                                           237
<OTHER-SE>                                     135,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,786,264
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            480,423
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (1,874)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  21,581
<BENEFITS>                                     380,738
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     12,593
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            39,367
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,880
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,066
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,814
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,814
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.53
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4617 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4617

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a temporary 
              moratorium on the medical device excise tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 12, 2017

Mr. Paulsen (for himself, Mrs. Walorski, and Mr. Kustoff of Tennessee) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a temporary 
              moratorium on the medical device excise tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON MEDICAL DEVICE EXCISE TAX.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 4191 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``2017'' and inserting 
``2022''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to sales after December 31, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.13  


 
 

IHS INC.
  2004 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN    
    
    2004 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD    
    


        Unless defined in this Restricted Stock Award (this "Award Document"), capitalized terms will have the same
meanings ascribed to them in the IHS Inc. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as may be amended from time to time, the "Plan"). 


        Pursuant
to Section 8 of the Plan, you have been granted restricted Shares on the following terms and subject to the provisions of the Plan, which is incorporated by reference. In
the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Plan and this Award Document, the provisions of the Plan will prevail. 



	Participant:	 	Charles Picasso
	
Total Number of Shares Granted:	
 	

240,000 Shares
	
Fair Market Value per Share:	
 	

$9.12 per Share
	
Total Fair Market Value of Award:	
 	

$2,066,400
	
Grant Date:	
 	

December 23, 2004
	
Vesting Schedule:	
 	

25% will vest on October 15, 2006, another 25% will vest on October 15, 2007 and the last 50% will vest on October 15, 2008; provided, however, that in the event of a Change in Control,
this Award shall vest in full and be free of restrictions, and you will participate in the acquisition to the extent of and in the same manner as all other stockholders of the Company; and provided further that in the event of your death or termination of employment due to your Disability (as defined in Exhibit A attached), this Award shall vest in full and be free of restrictions.





        By
your signature and the signature of the Company's representative below, you and the Company agree that these Shares are granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of the
Plan and the terms and conditions set forth in the attached as Exhibit A. 



	RECIPIENT	 	IHS INC.
	
/s/  CHARLES A. PICASSO      
	
 	

By:	

/s/  S. AUXER      

	Charles A. Picasso

Print Name	 	Title: Senior Vice President IHC Inc.













QuickLinks


IHS INC. 2004 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN 2004 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD
FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY (FTIR)

–

An Agilent Cary 630 Fourier Transform infrared spectrometer equipped with a deuterated triglycine sulfate

detector (DTGS) w as employed for qualitative analysis. Spectra were collected from 4000 to 650 cm -1

using attenuated total reflectance (ATR) with 16 scans and a resolution of 4 cm -1

.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4925 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4925

To require the Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration to 
  implement certain recommendations for management and collection of 
                         railroad safety data.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2018

Mr. Gottheimer (for himself and Mr. Mitchell) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration to 
  implement certain recommendations for management and collection of 
                         railroad safety data.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FRA Safety Data Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND COLLECTION OF RAILROAD 
              SAFETY DATA.

    (a) In General.--The Administrator of the Federal Railroad 
Administration shall develop a plan, and a timeline to carry out such 
plan, to implement the recommendations from the Inspector General 
Report No. ST2017045 of the Department of Transportation, issued on May 
3, 2017, to the greatest extent possible, to improve the Federal 
Railroad Administration's management and collection of railroad safety 
data.
    (b) Implementation.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit the plan 
        and timeline developed under subsection (a) to the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
        Transportation of the Senate.
            (2) Report.--The Administrator shall report annually to the 
        committees on the implementation of such plan until 
        implementation is complete.

SEC. 3. NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED.

    No additional funds are authorized to carry out the requirements of 
this Act. Such requirements shall be carried out using amounts 
otherwise authorized.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


      The   undersigned   executive   officer  of  WVS  Financial   Corp.   (the
"Registrant")  hereby certifies that the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained
therein fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.


                                                        /s/ Keith A. Simpson
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Keith A. Simpson
                                                        Vice-President and
                                                        Chief Accounting Officer


Date: September 23, 2005


Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has been provided to WVS Financial  Corp.  and will be
      retained by WVS  Financial  Corp.  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick L. Alexander,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Patrick L.  Alexander |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |
| Patrick L.  Alexander     |
| Chief Executive  Officer  |
| August 4,  2005      |

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Chief Judge F itzpatrick, Judge Bumgardner and Senior Judge Hodges

SUSAN ELAINE MANOLA MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2367-03-4 PER CURIAM JUNE 29, 2004 FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Kathleen G. Walsh, on brief), for appellant. (Michael N. Salveson; Hunton & Williams, LLP, on brief), for appellee.

Susan Elaine Manola (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that she failed to prove the medical treatment rendered by Dr. Stephen M. Levin from November 2000 through July 16, 2001, c onstituted reasonable and necessary medical attention within the meaning of the Workers’ Co mpensation Act. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Manola v. Fairfax (County of) School

Board , VWC File No. 199-88-11 (Aug. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument woul d not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 1

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.

1 Because we summarily affirm the comm ission’s decision, we will assume, without deciding, that claimant timely filed her notice of appeal.
Exhibit 31.2

                                CFO Certification
               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I, Michael S. McDevitt, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Medifast, Inc.;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
     the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
     over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: March 15, 2006


/s/ Michael S. McDevitt
-----------------------------
Michael S. McDevitt
President, Chief Financial Officer


                                       26
Exhibit 2.9





AGREEMENT




THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into as of this 25th day of September, 2009 by and between P. Jan Cannon (“CANNON”) and The Beard Company (“BEARD”), collectively hereafter referred to as the “PARTIES”.




WHEREAS, BEARD has advanced funds in the amount of $441,108.62 to CANNON to enable CANNON to meet Geohedral LLC’s 2009 Round #1Cash Call with the understanding that CANNON would then immediately assign the Membership Units acquired thereby to BEARD; and




WHEREAS, CANNON has assigned Certificate No. 117 to BEARD effective as of this date; and




WHEREAS, it was further agreed between the PARTIES that CANNON would assign his $441,108.62 capital account in Geohedral LLC to BEARD in full satisfaction of the funds advanced to him by BEARD in connection with the transaction and is fully relieved of any liabilities therefore.




NOW THEREFORE, BE IT AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES that a copy of this Agreement shall be furnished to Geohedral LLC so that a proper accounting of the transaction can be made in Geohedral’s records.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have executed this Agreement effective as of the above date.





CANNON:





/s/  P. Jan Cannon


P. Jan Cannon





BEARD:





THE BEARD COMPANY





By  /s/  Herb Mee, Jr.


Herb Mee, Jr., President
### IN THE S UP REME COURT OF TENNESS EE AT JAC KSON N ove m be r 9, 200 5 S es sio n STATE OF TENNESS EE v . DAVID IVY A ut om at ic A pp ea l f

ro m t he C ou rt

of C ri m in al A pp ea ls Cr im inal Court

for Sh elby C ounty N o. 01- 1238 8 Jos ep h B. D ail ey , Ju dg e

N o. W2 003- 0078 6- SC -D D T- D D - F ile d F eb ru ar y 28 , 200 6

AD OLPHO A. B I RCH , JR., J., c on c ur ri ng in p art

a nddis se nti ng in p art . I concur in the conclusion of the m aj o ri t y t h at I vy ’s convictions should be af firmed. As to the s entenc e of de ath, howeve r, I respe ctfully

dissent. I

continue to adhe re to my view that the c omp arativ e pr op ortio na lity re vie w p ro toc ol c ur

re ntl y e mbr a c e d b y

thema jority is i na de qu a te to sh ie ld d e fe nd a nts fr om the arb itr ary a nd dis pr op ortio nate imp os iti on of thede a th p e na lty . Se e State v. Reid , 1 6 4 S
. W
. 3 d2 8 6 , 3 2 3 -3 2 5 (T en n . 2 0 0 5 )( Bi rc h , J
. , co n cu rr i n g an dd i s s en t i n g), an dca s es cited there in. Accor dingly , I

respe ctfully

dissent from that portion of the majority opinion a ffirming the imposit ion of the death penalty in this case.

___________________________________

AD OLPHO A. B I RCH , JR.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6278]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. GRIMM:
        H.R. 6515.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 1
```