alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, theundersigned Chief Financial Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Young Ham                       |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| Young Ham, Chief  Financial Officer |
| August 30, 2005                |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MM2 Group, Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Mark
Meller, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.


                                              Date: November 14, 2005



                                              By /s/ Mark Meller
                                              -----------------------
                                              Mark Meller
                                              President, Chief Executive Officer
                                              and Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6061]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. ELLISON:
        H.R. 6411.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 1,3 and 18.
```
# C_2008272EN.01003602.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/36

---

Action brought on 12 August 2008 — Musumeci v Commission

(Case T-322/08)

(2008/C 272/70)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Antonio Musumeci (Bagnara Calabra, Italy) (represented by: A. Maiorana, A. De Matteis and A. De Francesco, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Commission Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 of 12 June 2008, published in OJ L 155 of 13 June 2008. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Commission Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 of 12 June 2008, published in OJ L 155 of 13 June 2008.

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those relied on in Case T-313/08 Veromar di Tudisco Alfio & Salvatore S.n.c v Commission.

Veromar di Tudisco Alfio & Salvatore S.n.c

Commission

---
UAS Flight Permission Form

In signing this form, I am giving Northeast Iowa Community College permission to operate

their UAS at less than 500 feet from property in which I am responsible for or affiliated with, for 

the purpose of collecting aerial imagery and video.

Name:

Title:

Basis of Authority to Grant Permission:

Location:

Date of Operation:

Signature __________________________________________________

Date __________________________

NICC Representative Receiving Permission

_______________________________________________________________
SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AND
                          NON-COMPETITION AND AGREEMENT



      This Seventh Amendment is made on the 28th day of February 2005, by and
between GEORGE R. JENSEN, JR. ("Jensen"), and USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a
Pennsylvania corporation ("USA").

                                   Background

      USA and Jensen entered into an Employment And Non-Competition Agreement
dated November 20, 1997, a First Amendment thereto dated June 17, 1999, a Second
Amendment thereto dated February 22, 2000, a Third Amendment thereto dated
January 16, 2002, a Fourth Amendment thereto dated April 15, 2002, a Fifth
Amendment thereto dated July 16, 2003, and a Sixth Amendment thereto dated
February 4, 2004 (collectively, the "Agreement"). As more fully set forth
herein, the parties desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects.

                                    Agreement

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants set forth herein, and
intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:

      1. Amendment. The date "June 30, 2005" appearing in the first and second
sentences of subparagraph (a) of Section 1. Employment. of the Agreement is
hereby deleted and the date "June 30, 2007" is hereby substituted in its place.

      2. Modification. Except as otherwise specifically set forth in Paragraph
1, the Agreement shall not be amended or modified in any respect whatsoever and
shall continue in full force and effect.

<PAGE>

      3. Capitalized Terms. Except as specifically provided otherwise herein,
all capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in
the Agreement.

      4. Effective Time. The amendment to the Agreement made in Paragraph 1
hereof shall be effective from and after February 3, 2005.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Seventh
Amendment on the day and year first above written.







                                         /S/ George R. Jensen, Jr.
                                         --------------------------------
                                         GEORGE R. JENSEN, JR.


                                         USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.



                                         By: /S/ Stephen P. Herbert
                                             ----------------------
                                             Stephen P. Herbert,
                                             President
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies (the “Company”),hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ John Kang                                               |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| John Kang, Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer |
| November 30, 2005                                      |

 

----
ni 

Mr. Denrii:. DeVany and Mr. Scott Faulk 

Es~tial Air Service Division. X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis, Room 6401 

Department Transportation 

400 7th St., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: EAS Docket #DOT ~OST -1996·1903 

Dear Mr. DeVany and Mr. Faulk: 

October 11,2012 

lfJ!Z !2 1: 33 

lam writing in support of Orant County's and the Town Silver City's decision 

support Great Lakes Airlines in their bid to continue :.ervice through the U.S. Department 

Transportation's Essential Air $ervice (BAS) .Program. Creat Lakes. Airlines woutd provide two 

roun\1 trips day between Phoenix: and Silver City using twin engine, pressurized aircraft. 

EAS remains vital to Crant County's current needs md future gto'Wth, and air service to a major 

hub like Phoenix will help to f4rther boost the county's social and economic health. 

Thank you for your consideration of lliant County's and Silver City's preference for their 

next EAS service. provider. Should you .have any questions., please do not hesitate to contact me 

or my Field Representative, Dara Parkcer, at575-523-6561 or 

d4U'a _pll'ker@bingaman.senate~aov. 

Sincerely. 

Jeff 

United 

Bingaman 

States 

~ Senator 

Cc: Jon Paul Saari, County Manager, Crant County 

James Marshall~ Mayor~ Town of Silver City 

JBildp
EXPERT CONSENT
 The undersigned hereby consents to (i) the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled “Prairie Creek Property Northwest Territories, Canada Technical Report for Canadian Zinc Corporation” with an effective date of June 15, 2012 and other mineral resource and reserve information pertaining to the Prairie Creek Property in the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) for the year ended December 31, 2012 of Canadian Zinc Corporation (the “Company”) and in the Management Discussion & Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2012 of the Company, and (ii) the use of the name, AMC Mining Consultants Ltd., in the AIF, the MD&A and the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012 and any amendments thereto incorporating by reference the Company’s AIF, MD&A and the Annual Report on Form 40-F.
 Dated this 19th day of March, 2013.
 AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.
 /s/ AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.
  1
#### Dana M. Messina, Appellant, v Margaret A. Messina, Respondent.

— In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.), dated January 30, 1991, which granted the defen*867dant’s application pursuant to Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-108, to disqualify the law firm of Slater, Vanderpool & Breakstone, and David Vanderpool, from representing the plaintiff in the action.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the motion is denied.

The defendant wife moved to disqualify the plaintiff’s attorney and his law firm, Slater, Vanderpool & Breakstone, on the ground that the predecessor firm of Mr. Vanderpool served as the parties’ “family attorney” during the marriage. Specifically, the wife alleged that Mr. Vanderpool represented her and her husband in the purchase of the marital residence in 1984, and she implies that the predecessor firm provided representation in other unspecified matters as well. However, the record only demonstrates the single representation for the purchase of the marital residence in 1984.

There is no dispute between the parties that the marital residence is property of the marriage. Additionally, Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (4) requires financial disclosure by the parties in a matrimonial action, and the wife has not alleged any actual misuse by the husband’s counsel of any confidences related to the subject matter of the matrimonial action *(see, Cardinale v Golinello,*43 NY2d 288, 295-296). Under these circumstances, when weighing the right of a party “to freedom from apprehension” *(Cardinale v Golinello, supra,*at 296), as against the other party’s right to the free choice of counsel *(see, Matter of Abrams [Anonymous],*62 NY2d 183), we find that the representation in the routine purchase of the marital residence some six years prior to the present action is an insufficient ground on which to rest the disqualification of the husband’s counsel *(see, Lucci v Lucci,*150 AD2d 650). Eiber, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.02
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Theresa D. Becks, Chief Financial Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc., the general partner ofCampbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P. (the “Fund”), do hereby certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Fund; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.    By: /s/ Theresa D. Becks      Theresa D. Becks Chief Financial Officer March 29, 2005
E 3
# C_2009032EN.01004302.xml

| 7.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/43

---

Action brought on 14 November 2008 — Ryanair/Commission

(Case T-500/08)

(2009/C 32/84)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ryanair Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, I. Metaxas-Maragkidis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare in accordance with Articles 230 and 231 EC that the Commission's implied decision refusing access to the documents for which access was requested by the applicant in an application dated 25 June 2008 is void and that the Commission's decision of 31 October 2008 refusing access to the same documents is non-existent; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare in accordance with Articles 230 and 231 EC that the Commission's implied decision refusing access to the documents for which access was requested by the applicant in an application dated 25 June 2008 is void and that the Commission's decision of 31 October 2008 refusing access to the same documents is non-existent;

| — | alternatively, declare in accordance with Articles 230 and 231 EC that the Commission's decision of 31 October 2008 refusing access to the documents for which access was requested by the applicant in an application dated 25 June 2008 is void; |
| --- | --- |

—

alternatively, declare in accordance with Articles 230 and 231 EC that the Commission's decision of 31 October 2008 refusing access to the documents for which access was requested by the applicant in an application dated 25 June 2008 is void;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings; and |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings; and

| — | take such further action as the Court may deem appropriate. |
| --- | --- |

—

take such further action as the Court may deem appropriate.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By means of this application the applicant seeks annulment of the Commission implied decision rejecting the applicant's request, pursuant to Regulation No 1049/2001 (1), of the access to documents relating to State aid procedures concerning the presumed State aid granted through an agreement with the operator of Tampere-Pirkkala airport. The said decision was followed by the express decision of 31 October 2008. The annulment of the express decision is alternatively sought by the applicant in the present case.

1

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicant are identical to those relied on in Case T-494/08 Ryanair v Commission.

Ryanair

Commission

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
    OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
    2002
    Form 10-Q
    May 13,
    2009

/s/  Jeffrey
    T.
    HansonDate

Jeffrey T. HansonPresidentGrubb & Ellis Realty Investors, LLC,
    the Manager of NNN 2002 Value Fund, LLC(principal executive officer)   Form 10-Q
UAV SPECS – DJI PHANTOM 2 VISION

Aircraft

SUPPORTED BATTERY - DJI 5200mAh LiPo Battery

WEIGHT (BATTERY & PROPELLERS INCLUDED) - 1242g

HOVER ACCURACY (READY TO FLY)- Vertical: 0.8m; Horizontal: 2.5m

MAX YAW ANGULAR VELOCITY - 200°/s

MAX TILTABLE ANGLE - 35°

MAX ASCENT / DESCENT SPEED - Ascent: 6m/s; Descent: 2m/s

MAX FLIGHT SPEED - 15m/s (Not Recommended)

DIAGONAL MOTOR-MOTOR DISTANCE - 350mm

Gimbal 

WORKING CURRENT - Static : 750mA; Dynamic : 900mA

CONTROL ACCURACY - ±0.03°

CONTROLLABLE RANGE - Pitch : -90°-0°

MAXIMUM ANGULAR SPEED - Pitch : 90°/s

Camera 

OPERATING ENVIRONMENT TEMPERATURE - 0Ԩ-40Ԩ

SENSOR SIZE - 1/2.3"

EFFECTIVE PIXELS - 14 Megapixels

RESOLUTION - 4384×3288

HD RECORDING - 1080p30 & 720p

RECORDING FOV - 110° / 85°

Remote 

Control 

OPERATING FREQUENCY - 5.728 GHz-5.85 GHz

COMMUNICATION DISTANCE (OPEN AREA) - CE Compliance: 400m; FCC 

Compliance: 800m

RECEIVER SENSITIVITY (1%PER) -93dBm

TRANSMITTER POWER - CE Compliance: 25mW; FCC Compliance: 100mW

WORKING VOLTAGE - 120 mA@3.7V

BUILT-IN LIPO BATTERY WORKING CURRENT/CAPACITY 3.7V, 2000mAh
UAV SPECS – DJI PHANTOM 2 VISION

Range 

Extender 

OPERATING FREQUENCY 2412-2462MHz

COMMUNICATION DISTANCE (OPEN AREA) 500-700m

TRANSMITTER POWER 20dBm

POWER CONSUMPTION 2W
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies(the “Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 3) of the Company for the quarter endedJune 30, 2005, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Ricardo A. Salas                                     |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Ricardo A. Salas, President and Chief Executive  Officer |
| July 20, 2006                                            |

 

----
From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: David Orlin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/27/2011 05:09 PM

Subject: Re: A couple small suggested edits soon



### Thanks Heidi. We are going to modify the first paragraph of the UMRA section to add the "(adjusted for

inflation)" language at the end of the second sentence, move that phrase to the end of the second

sentence in the second paragraph, so that it reads the same as the sentence in the first paragraph, and

accept the other edit in the fourth sentence in the second paragraph. I hope this addresses the concern.

Let me know if this works for you.
#### James K. WALKER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 11610.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Oct. 28, 1939.

Alpha N. Brown, of Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

Maurice M. Milligan, U. S. Atty., and Richard K. Phelps, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Kansas City, Mo.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court docketed and dismissed under Rule 37 of this Court. Defendant ordered to surrender to custody, etc.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The J. Jill Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|                                                                                                                                          |  |                                                                                                                               
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/GORDON R. COOKEGordon R. Cooke
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer) |  | /s/OLGA L. CONLEYOlga L. Conley
Executive Vice President /
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
|Date: March 10, 2004                                                                                                                      |  | Date: March 10, 2004                                                                                                          

---

QuickLinks