alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6536-S6537]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   TRIBUTE TO MOIRA McCARTHY STANFORD

 Mr. BROWN of Massachusetts. Mr. President, today I wish to 
recognize Ms. Moira McCarthy Stanford, who has contributed enormously 
and tirelessly to the cause of fighting diabetes.
  Moira's support for diabetes research stems from her personal journey 
learning about diabetes. Her daughter, Lauren, was diagnosed with type 
1 diabetes shortly after her sixth birthday. Type 1 diabetes is a 
chronic disorder that occurs when the pancreas does not produce enough 
insulin to properly control the body's sugar levels. We can all agree 
that navigating through diabetes management for both parents and 
children is extremely difficult, and with no cure for this disease, 
Moira's advocacy for research is essential.
  Now, you may be familiar with the ongoing clinical trials for an 
artificial pancreas, which will dramatically improve the quality of 
life for individuals living with diabetes. This device has the 
potential to improve diabetes control by automatically providing the 
amount of insulin an individual needs to maintain healthy glucose 
levels. I am encouraged by these developments, which Moira has strongly 
supported. Her daughter Lauren will participate in these trials, and I 
am impressed that she is following in her mother's footsteps to help 
others living with diabetes.
  I would also like to mention that Moira will be riding in this year's 
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation's Ride to Cure Diabetes. She will 
be bicycling 105 miles through Death Valley to raise money for the 
foundation. An avid cycler myself, I understand the dedication required 
to train for this type event. I am also impressed that she is the 
second highest fundraiser in the Nation for this race. Moira has worked 
tirelessly for the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, JDRF. She has 
served as president of the JDRF and was named JDRF International 
Volunteer of the Year in 2007.
  I would like to thank Moira McCarthy Stanford for her tremendous work

[[Page S6537]]

on behalf of the diabetes community and the JDRF. I know that her 
family, her daughter, Lauren, and the people of Massachusetts are 
extremely proud of her advocacy and service.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.5

                         EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION

         This EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION (hereinafter referred to as this
"AGREEMENT EXTENSION"), is entered into effective the 8th day of April, 2005, by
and between The Franklin Savings and Loan Company, a savings and loan
association incorporated under the laws of the State of Ohio (hereinafter
referred to as the "EMPLOYER") and John P. Owens, an individual (hereinafter
referred to as the "EMPLOYEE");

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, the EMPLOYEE is currently employed as the Vice President of
the EMPLOYER; and

         WHEREAS, the EMPLOYER and the EMPLOYEE are parties to an employment
agreement dated December 20, 2004 (the "EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT"); and

         WHEREAS, Section 1 of the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT provides that the Board
of Directors of the EMPLOYER may extend the term of the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT for
a one-year term beyond the then effective expiration date, provided the Board
has determined that the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT should be extended; and

         WHEREAS, as a result of the skill, knowledge, performance and
experience of the EMPLOYEE, the Board of Directors of the EMPLOYER has
determined that the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT should be extended for an additional
one-year term; and

         WHEREAS, the EMPLOYEE desires to continue to serve as the Vice
President of the EMPLOYER and consents to the extension of the EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants
herein contained, the EMPLOYER and the EMPLOYEE hereby agree as follows:

         1. Extension of Term of Employment Agreement. The term of the
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is extended for a one year period and shall end on December
20, 2008 (the "EXTENDED TERM").

         2. Effect of Prior Agreements. All of the terms and conditions of the
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT shall remain in full force and effect during the EXTENDED
TERM.


<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the EMPLOYER has caused this AGREEMENT EXTENSION to
be executed by its duly authorized officer, and the EMPLOYEE has consented to
and signed this AGREEMENT EXTENSION, each as of the day and year first above
written.


                                           EMPLOYER:

Attest:                                    THE FRANKLIN SAVINGS AND LOAN COMPANY


/s/ Gretchen J. Schmidt                    By:  /s/ Thomas H. Siemers
---------------------------                     -----------------------------
Gretchen J. Schmidt                        Name:  Thomas H. Siemers
---------------------------                      ----------------------------
                                           Title:  President
                                                  ---------------------------


                                           EMPLOYEE:
Attest:


/s/ Gretchen J. Schmidt                    /s/ John P. Owens
---------------------------                ----------------------------------
Gretchen J. Schmidt                        John P. Owens
---------------------------
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas P. Reed, Vice President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Thomas P. ReedThomas P. Reed(chief financial officer)August 12, 2004
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 14

- 00008

- CV

TFHSP SERIES L.L.C., SERIES N 6 AND

THE STIRRUP IRON 6048 LAND TRUST, Appellant s

V.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ET AL., Appellee s

On Appeal from the 342nd District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 342

- 0265740

- 13

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

The appellants

, TFHSP Series L.L.C., Series N 6

, and The Stirrup Iron 6048 Land Trust

,

have filed a n agreed motion to dismiss the pending ap peal in this matter. 1 The appellants

represent that the parties have reached a full and final settlement and that they no longer desire to

prosecute this appeal.

The appellants’ motion is granted, and the appeal is dismiss ed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a)(1).

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: June 4, 2014

Date Decided: June 5, 2014

1 Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals in Fort Worth, this case was transferred to this Court by the

Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 73.001 (West

2013). We are unaware of any conflic t between precedent of the Second Court of Appeals and that of this Court on

any relevant issue. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 41.3.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-11032

Summary Calendar

 

ARTHUR F. WEPPNER,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

U.S. PAROLE COMM’N,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(4:95-CV-546-A)

- - - - - - - - - -

July 1, 1996

Before JOHNSON, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Arthur F. Weppner appeals the denial of his petition for

habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Weppner

contends: that mandatory releasees are different from parolees

for purposes of revocation of “street time”; that the Parole

Commission may not forfeit “street time” earned by a mandatory

releasee; that the Parole Commission impermissibly lengthened his

sentence in violation of Article III of the Constitution when it
No. 95-11032

- 2 -

forfeited his “street time”; and that his Missouri carelessdriving offense was not the type of offense on which the Parole

Commission could base the revocation of “street time.”

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties

and we find no reversible error regarding whether the Parole

Commission could forfeit a mandatory releasee’s “street time.” 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment on those contentions

essentially for the reasons provided by the district court. See

Weppner v. USPC, No. 4:95-CV-546-A (N.D. Tex. Sep. 28, 1995).

We review Weppner’s contentions, raised for the first time

on appeal, that the Parole Commission violated Article III and

that his offense was not the type allowing for forfeiture of his

“street time” for plain error. See Highlands Ins. Co. v.

National Union Fire Ins. Co., 27 F.3d 1027, 1032 (5th Cir. 1994),

cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 903 (1995). The Commission did not

extend Weppner’s sentence; rather, the Commission forfeited his

street time, as it was entitled to do. Munguia v. USPC, 871 F.2d

517, 521 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 856 (1989). 

Weppner’s admission that his careless-driving offense carried a

maximum 90-day jail term dooms his contention that his offense

was not of the type allowing for forfeiture. The statutory

scheme contemplates forfeiture of street time for any offense

punishable by imprisonment. Id.

AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of the City of Glen Cove, Petitioner. Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities et al., Respondents.

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, dated August 30, 1989, which, after a hearing, *244upheld the plan of Nassau Association for the Help of Retarded Children to establish a community residence for retarded and developmentally disabled persons at a proposed site in Glen Cove and rejected alternate sites proposed by the City of Glen Cove.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs to the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities.

The Commissioner used the proper standard when he found that the alternative sites suggested by the municipality, which had previously been rejected by the sponsoring agency, were not superior to the site proposed by the sponsoring agency *(see, Matter of City of Glen Cove v Surles,*157 AD2d 657; *Matter of Town of Brookhaven v Katz,*143 AD2d 1023; *Town of Ramapo v Webb,*137 AD2d 518; *Matter of Town of Oyster Bay v Webb,*111 AD2d 760). The record contains substantial evidence to support the Commissioner’s determination that the alternative sites were not superior to the proposed site *(see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176). The evidence did not establish that the community residential facility would substantially alter the character and nature of the neighborhood *(see,*Mental Hygiene Law § 41.34 [c] [5]; *Matter of Town of Hempstead v Commissioner of State of N. Y. Off. of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities,*121 AD2d 388; *Town of Hempstead v Commissioner, State of N. Y. Off. of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities,*89 AD2d 850). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Filed 9/13/18 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2018 ND 207

In the Interest of I.N., a child

Ashley Lil, L.S.W., Cass County 

Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

I.N., child; John Doe, father, Respondents

and

T.N., mother, Respondent and Appellant 

No. 20180291

Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Susan J. Solheim, Judicial Referee.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Pam H. Ormand, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.

Jay R. Greenwood, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant, appeared on brief.  No appearance at oral argument.

Interest of I.N.

No. 20180291

Per Curiam.

[¶1]T.N. appealed from a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights to I.N. The juvenile court found I.N. is deprived, the conditions and causes of the deprivation are likely to continue, and I.N. has suffered or will probably suffer serious physical, mental, or emotional harm. On appeal, T.N. argues there was not clear and convincing evidence to support a termination of her parental rights. We conclude the juvenile court’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen
#### BREWER v. STATE.

No. A-11755.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

April 29, 1953.

*1118Orval Grim, Sayre, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., and Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

JONES, Judge.,

The defendant, Clyde Brewer, was charged by an information filed in the County Court of Beckham County with the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. A jury was waived, the defendant was tried,, found guilty, and sentenced to serve 30 days in the county jail and pay a fine of $150.

The same questions are presented by this appeal as were considered by the court in the case against this identical individual which was decided April 1, 1953. Brewer v. State, Okl.Cr.App., 255 P.2d 954. The attack was made upon the affidavit for the- search warrant and also it was contended that the warrant described premises occupied by more than one family and was therefore la blanket search warrant. The affidavits which formed the basis for the issuance of the search warrants in Brewer v. State, supra, and in this case were identical and our opinion in the above case will control the disposition of this case. Furthermore, the contention that the premises described in the warrant covered the family dwellings of more than one family was based upon substantially the same evidence that was introduced in Brewer v. State, supra. In that case we held that the trial court’s finding on a disputed question- of fact at a hearing on a motion to suppress evidence will be sustained where there was' competent evidence in the record to support the court’s finding.

We find no substantial errors in this record and in accordance with the opinion in the Brewer v. State case cited above, the judgment and sentence of the County Court of Beckham County is affirmed.

POWELL, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
32.2
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund
IV, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Kimberly A. Springsteen-Abbott, Chief Financial Officer of the general
partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/
      Kimberly A. Springsteen-AbbottKimberly
      A. Springsteen-AbbottChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      15, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4792 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4792

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to expand access to 
 capital for small businesses affected by hurricanes or other natural 
                   disasters, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Access to Capital 
After a Natural Disaster Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANDING ACCESS TO CAPITAL FOR SMALL BUSINESSES IMPACTED BY A 
              NATURAL DISASTER.

    Section 4 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78d) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (j)(4)(C), by striking ``minority-owned 
        and women-owned small businesses'' and inserting ``minority-
        owned small businesses, women-owned small businesses, and small 
        businesses affected by hurricanes or other natural disasters''; 
        and
            (2) in subsection (j)(6)(B)(iii), by striking ``minority-
        owned and women-owned small businesses'' and inserting 
        ``minority-owned small businesses, women-owned small 
        businesses, and small businesses affected by hurricanes or 
        other natural disasters''.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 29, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4792

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to expand access to 
 capital for small businesses affected by hurricanes or other natural 
                   disasters, and for other purposes.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MM2 Group, Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Mark
Meller, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.



                                              Date: February 15, 2008


                                              By /s/ Mark Meller
                                              ---------------------
                                              Mark Meller
                                              President, Chief Executive Officer
                                              and Principal Accounting Officer
ex10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 





 


December 27, 2011


 


Recycool, Inc.


931 13th Ave. SE


Forest Lake, MN 55025







RE: Payment of Audit Fees; Amendment No. 1 to Asset Purchase Agreement


 


Dear Kurt, Marty, and Dennis:


 


This letter (“Letter”) confirms our agreement to amend and supplement the Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated December 16, 2011 by and among Recycool, Inc. (“Seller”), Marty Rosauer, Kurt Rosauer, Dennis Scott (Marty Rosauer, Kurt Rosauer, and Dennis Scott collectively known as “Selling Principals”), GlyEco Acquisition Corp #1 (“Buyer”), and GlyEco, Inc. (“Parent Company”) (all entities and individuals collectively referred to as “Parties”).   All terms not defined herein shall have the meanings in the Agreement.







Seller agrees to promptly pay prior to Closing $ 8,153.35 (the “Audit Fee”) to Jorgensen & Co (the “Auditor”), representing the balance due per the Auditor’s statement of December 12, 2011 of the cost to audit Seller’s 2009 and 2010 financials.  In consideration of Seller’s payment of the Audit Fee, Parent Company will issue an additional 8,153 Shares in aggregate, distributed among the Selling Principals pro-rata in accordance with the manner Shares are issued among the Selling Principals under the terms of the Agreement.  The Auditor’s report shall be the property of the Buyer at Closing.


 


All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged.


 


 




	
“SELLER”

	
“BUYER”


	
RECYCOOL, INC. a Minnesota corporation

	
   GLYECO ACQUISITION CORP. #1, an Arizona corporation


	  	  
	  	  
	
By: /s/ Marty Rosauer                 

	
By: /s/ John d’Arc Lorenz                            


	
Name: Marty Rosauer

	
John d’Arc Lorenz, II, Chairman and CEO


	
Title: President

	  
	
Dated: January 2, 2012

	  
	  	  
	  	  
	
“SELLING PRINCIPALS”

	
“PARENT COMPANY”


	  	
GLYECO, INC., a Nevada corporation


	  	  
	
/s/ Kurt Rosauer                          

	  
	
KURT ROSAUER, an individual

	
By: /s/ John d’Arc Lorenz                               


	
Dated: January 2, 2012

	
   John d’Arc Lorenz, II, Chairman and CEO


	  	  
	  	  
	
/s/ Marty Rosauer                        

	  
	
MARTY ROSAUER, an individual

	  
	
Dated: January 2, 2012

	  
	  	  
	  	  
	
/s/ Dennis Scott                           

	  
	
DENNIS SCOTT, an individual

	  
	
Dated: January 2, 2012