alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1651]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                RECOGNIZING THE RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. ADAM SMITH

                             of washington

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I rise to honor the Renton 
Housing Authority and congratulate them on the successes of the Sunset 
Area Community Revitalization Program. The commitment of all who work 
with the Renton Housing Authority has been instrumental in providing 
quality, affordable, and safe housing options for low-income 
individuals and families.
  The Renton Housing Authority was established in 1941 to provide 
middle and low-income workers affordable housing near the Boeing B-29 
and PACAR Sherman Tank manufacturing lines. In 1959, the Renton Housing 
Authority constructed Sunset Terrace.
  The Sunset Area Community Revitalization Program is focused on the 
redevelopment of the Sunset Terrace public housing project. This effort 
is an important community enhancement that will help all residents of 
Renton, Washington have a safe place to call home.
  The Sunset Area Community Revitalization Program will also receive a 
2012 VISION 2040 Award from the Puget Sound Regional Council. This 
award is given to projects that are finding solutions to the Puget 
Sound region's expected growth, specifically projects that promote the 
well-being of our communities and economic vitality.
  Mr. Speaker, it is with great honor that I recognize the valuable 
contributions of the Renton Housing Authority. The organization's 
dedication to helping people in our communities is laudable.

                          ____________________
```
exv4w1






Exhibit 4.1








	COMMON STOCK COMMON STOCK SEE REVERSE FOR
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CLJSIP
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE, OF
CERES, INC
transferable in person or by attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This
certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.
WITNESS the facsimile signatures of the Corporation’s duly authorized officers.
Dated:





 









 






     The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,
shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or
regulations:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	TEN COM

	 	—
	 	as tenants in common
	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT —      
               
Custodian       
                
	TEN ENT

	 	—
	 	as tenants by the entireties
	 	    
    
    
(Cust)       
            
      
(Minor)      
	JT TEN

	 	—
	 	as joint tenants with right
	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors    
       
	 

	 	 	 	of survivorship and not as
	 	Act        
               
      
          
         
   
	 

	 	 	 	tenants in common
	 	       
       
       
       
       
   (State)






Additional
abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.


For value received,
                                                             hereby sell, assign and transfer unto



PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

          IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE





 

 



      



PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE


      





      


      
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
     Shares
of the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint            
             
               
             
            
        
              
            
             
             
             
             
             
             
          Attorney
to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of
substitution in the premises.



Dated   
             
            
             




	 	 	 	 	 

	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	NOTICE:
	 	THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH
THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION
OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.






SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED:




	 	 	 

	 


	 	 
	THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS,
SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE
MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-16.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 01671

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

01671\01671_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

x 01671\01671_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

01671\01671_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

01671\01671_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 01671\01671_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01671\01671_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01671\01671_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01671\01671_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01671\01671_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01671\Follow up\01671 A5-3 & D3-1 WB diagram.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01671\Follow up\01671 Email.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 01671\Follow up\01671 review ques 2011-02-07.doc Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 01671\Follow up\01671 review ques.doc Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 01671\Follow up\EPA Rockport FollowUp.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

01671\Supporting Documentation\01671_AEP ELGs ICR submittal letter 10-13-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01671\Supporting Documentation\01671_AEP RK 01671 A2-3 EIS 1981.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01671\Supporting Documentation\01671_AEP RK 01671 A5-2 Map-1 aerial.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01671\Supporting Documentation\01671_AEP RK 01671 A5-2 Map-2 topo.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01671\Supporting Documentation\01671_AEP RK 01671 A5-3 & D3-1 Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01671\Supporting Documentation\AEP RK 01671 A5-2 Map-3 NPDES Topo Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000910468
<NAME> FLOORING AMERICA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-05-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-05-2000
<CASH>                                          45,612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,031
<INVENTORY>                                     47,480
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               165,795
<PP&E>                                          89,575
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 342,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          213,996
<BONDS>                                        145,596
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   342,549
<SALES>                                        762,808
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               762,808
<CGS>                                          481,241
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  325,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,635
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,263
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (63,926)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,611
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (65,537)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  5,009
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (70,546)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.70)


</TABLE>
_____________

No. 96-1672MN

_____________

John Edward Palmer, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Minnesota.

*

Frank W. Wood, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

_____________

Submitted: October 23, 1996

 Filed: October 30, 1996

_____________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

John Edward Palmer was convicted of selling more than 200 dosage

units of LSD to a cooperating witness. See Minn. Stat. § 152.021, subd.

1(3) (1992). After the Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed Palmer's

conviction, State v. Palmer, 507 N.W.2d 865 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993), Palmer

filed this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas relief. The district court

denied Palmer's petition, and we affirm. 

Palmer contends the Minnesota drug statute is unconstitutionally

vague because the statute does not contain a comprehensible standard of

criminal conduct. Although "dosage units" is not defined in the statute,

the term is commonly understood as the amount of an ingredient taken at one

time. We thus reject Palmer's effort "to inject doubt [about] the meaning

of words where no doubt would be felt by the normal reader." United States

v. Powell, 423 U.S. 87, 93 (1975). In our view, "a
-2-

reasonably ascertainable standard of conduct is mandated; it is for

[Palmer] to insure that his actions do not fall outside the legal limits."

Id. at 92; see United States v. McKinney, 79 F.3d 105, 108 (8th Cir. 1996).

The Minnesota Court of Appeals aptly observed that the number of dosage

units may be established through witness testimony, and in Palmer's case,

the testimony from the cooperating witness and a state chemist showed that

Palmer sold more than 900 doses of LSD. Palmer, 507 N.W.2d at 868-69.

"[T]he law is full of instances [like Palmer's] where a man's fate depends

on his estimating rightly, that is, as the jury [later] estimates it, some

matter of degree." Nash v. United States, 229 U.S. 373, 377 (1913). 

Turning to Palmer's other contentions, Palmer's sufficiency of the

evidence arguments are simply without merit. Gibson v. Bowersox, 78 F.3d

372, 374 (8th Cir. 1996) (standard of review). Likewise, we reject

Palmer's contention the trial court improperly admitted his tape recorded

conversations with the cooperating witness because the admission of the

tape recordings did not deny Palmer a fair trial. Rainer v. Dep't of

Corrections, 914 F.2d 1067, 1072 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S.

1099 (1991). 

We affirm the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

Post focus assessment based on releases in Test Data Review Engineering Report 

Draft Revision 1, dated 04/19/2011. 

Chemical ID: P-10-0588 Reviewer: Flessner/SS 

 

 

Results Table: Dose, Concentration, and Days Exceeded Results Summary

Exposure Scenario1 Water Landfill Stack Air Fugitive Air

Drinking Water Fish Ingestion

ADR LADD ADR LADD 7Q104

CC = 1

PDM 

Days 

Exceede

d

LADD ADR LADD ADR LADD

Release 

activity(ies)2; 

exposure 

calculation(s)3 

mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day μg/l # Days mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day

USE: Max ADR

USE: Max LADD

1 Exposure scenario titles consist of release activity followed by exposure calculation abbreviation.

2 Release activities are from engineering report's Manufacturing (Mfg), Processing (Proc) and Use release 

activity labels.Multiple release activities are combined in one exposure scenario if their releases occur at 

same location.

3 Exposure calculations are Acute Dose Rate (ADR), Lifetime Average Daily Dose (LADD), and 

Probabilistic Dilution Model (PDM). There may be one, two, or all three exposure calculations per exposure 

scenario.CC is the aquatic concentration of concern.

4 This column displays concentration values for the 7Q10 streamflow, which is defined as the average daily 

streamflow of the seven consecutive days of lowest flow within a ten year period.

Remarks: 

Results Table: Exposure Based (XB)/Persistent (P2B2) Criteria

Parameter Exp Based Persistent Exceedance Value

Drinking (Surface) Water Dose (mg/kg/day) NA No 

Fish Ingestion Dose (mg/kg/day) NA No

Inhalation Dose (mg/kg/day) NA No 

Groundwater Dose (mg/kg/day) NA No

Surface Water Release After Treatment (kg/yr) NA No 

Total Release After Treatment (kg/yr) NA No

Consumer Use? No 

Fate test recommendations?: (default is NA)

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 7
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-10-0588 Assessor: Flessner/SS

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#:1 Number of Release Sites 

Release Activity: : Max ADR

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL

Non-sludge/Sludge 

STACK FUGITIVE

Total Releases:

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Non-sludge/Sludge

Release Days/yr:

Per Site Release:

(kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day)

Remarks: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 7
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-10-0588

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 7
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 7
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-10-0588 Assessor: Flessner/SS

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#:2 Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity: : Max LADD

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL

Non-sludge/Sludge 

STACK FUGITIVE

Total Releases:

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Non-sludge/Sludge

Release Days/yr:

Per Site Release:

(kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day)

Remarks: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 7
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-10-0588

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 7
 Stack Parameter Data Fugitive Parameter Data

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 7
##### 



Exhibit 10.3
 CKE Restaurants, Inc.
 Amendment No. 2  To  Employment Agreement
 Amendment Company Employee
 RECITALS:
 Agreement
  AGREEMENT
 Other Compensation and Fringe Benefits
 Definitions
 Counterparts
 Terms and Conditions of Agreement
 [Signature Page Follows]




---



##### 



/s/Noah J. GriggsNoah J. GriggsCKE Restaurants, Inc.By:
    /s/Andrew F. PuzderAndrew F. PuzderPresident and Chief Executive Officer 2
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00206-CV

Holt Texas, Ltd.

v.

Eustacio Rubio d/b/a Delata Aggregate & Landscaping Materials

On Appeal from the

139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C-1839-18-C

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal 

are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 12, 2020
Counties in Bold Contain Distressed Areas

County Economic Status and Number of Distressed Areas in 

Appalachian Mississippi, Fiscal Year 2020

County Status

Economic

Areas

Distressed

Number of

Alcorn Transitional 2

Benton Distressed

Calhoun At-Risk 2

Chickasaw At-Risk 2

Choctaw At-Risk 1

Clay Distressed

Itawamba Transitional 2

Kemper Distressed

Lee Transitional 3

Lowndes At-Risk 5

Marshall At-Risk 2

Monroe At-Risk 2

Montgomery Distressed

Noxubee Distressed

Oktibbeha At-Risk 1

Panola At-Risk 2

Pontotoc Transitional

Prentiss At-Risk 2

Tippah At-Risk 3

Tishomingo At-Risk 1

Union Transitional 2

Webster At-Risk 1

Winston Distressed

Yalobusha At-Risk 2

Appalachian Regional Commission, June 2019
Distressed Areas in Appalachian Mississippi, 

Fiscal Year 2020

County

Census Tract 

ID Number

Alcorn 9505

Alcorn 9506

Calhoun 9504

Calhoun 9505

Chickasaw 9501

Chickasaw 9503

Choctaw 9503

Itawamba 9501

Itawamba 9504

Lee 9506.02

Lee 9507

Lee 9510.02

Lowndes 6

Lowndes 7

Lowndes 8

Lowndes 9

Lowndes 11

Marshall 9504.01

Marshall 9505

Monroe 9504

Monroe 9508

Oktibbeha 9503

Panola 9501

Panola 9502

Prentiss 9503

Prentiss 9505

Tippah 9501

Tippah 9502

Tippah 9503

Tishomingo 9502

Union 9501

Union 9502

Webster 9503

Yalobusha 9501

Yalobusha 9502

Appalachian Regional Commission, June 2019
LEE

KEMPER

PANOLA

MONROE

CLAY

NOXUBEE

MARSHALL TIPPAH

WINSTON

UNION

CALHOUN

ITAWAMBA

LOWNDES

BENTON ALCORN

PONTOTOC

WEBSTER

CHICKASAW

PRENTISS

CHOCTAW

YALOBUSHA

OKTIBBEHA

TISHOMINGO

MONTGOMERY

0 25 50

Miles

Levels of 

Economic Status

Distressed County

At-Risk County

Transitional County

Competitive County

Attainment County

County Economic Status in Appalachian Mississippi,

Fiscal Year 2020
LEE

MONROE

PANOLA

KEMPER

CLAY

MARSHALL

WINSTON NOXUBEE

UNION

CALHOUN

TIPPAH

ALCORN

LOWNDES

BENTON

PONTOTOC

ITAWAMBA

PRENTISS

WEBSTER

CHOCTAW

YALOBUSHA

CHICKASAW

OKTIBBEHA

TISHOMINGO

MONTGOMERY

County Economic Status and Distressed Areas in

Appalachian Mississippi, Fiscal Year 2020

Levels of 

Economic Status

Distressed County

At-Risk County

Distressed Area

Transitional County

Distressed Area

Competitive County

Attainment County

0 15 30

Miles

M S 

A L
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SIN Holdings, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Steve S. Sinohui, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and  result of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Steve S. Sinohui
Steve S. Sinohui, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 7, 2007
aaxiv8kex102_1112012.htm


 


EXHIBIT 10.2


 


 


Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC


 







1840 Gateway Drive, Suite 200


Foster City, CA 94404







January 9, 2012







Accelerated Acquisitions XIV, Inc.


1840 Gateway Drive, Suite 200


Foster City, CA 94404







Re:           Tender of shares for cancellation







Gentlemen:







By this letter, the undersigned tenders for cancellation 3,500,000 of the 5,000,000 shares of common stock par value $0.0001 of Accelerated Acquisitions, XIV, Inc. (the “Company”) which it holds.  Following the cancellation of such shares, Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC will hold a total of 1,500,000 of the Company’s Common Shares.







Sincerely,







ACCELERATED VENTURE PARTNERS, LLC












By:       /s/ Timothy Neher


    Timothy Neher, Managing Member
#### Application of John SMITH, Jr., for Writ of Mandamus.

No. A-12975.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Dec. 7, 1960.

John Smith, Jr., pro se.

Raymond W. Graham, Tulsa Co. Dist. Judge, Tulsa, respondent, pro se.

*1047BRETT, Judge.

This is an original proceeding herein by-John Smith, Jr., an inmate of the penitentiary, seeking a writ of mandamus for case-■made for an appeal. It appears in a response by the District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, that the request was denied for the following reasons to wit:

(1) The judgment and sentence was entered upon petitioner’s plea of guilty and his request for casemade was frovolous.

(2) The petitioner does not state petition•er is without friends or relatives who could finance said appeal;

(3) The petitioner does not state his •counsel is unable to prepare the casemade from memory. The petition is defective in all the foregoing respects; under these conditions the writ must be denied. Application of Mennelli, Okl.Cr., 332 P.2d 38.

It is apparent this petition is wholly without merit and the Writ of Mandamus for casemade is denied.

POWELL, P. J., and NIX, J., concur.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report for the period ending September
13, 2003, of Roadway Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
D. Staley, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Roadway
Corporation and will be retained by Roadway Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

October 27, 2003                                   /s/ James D. Staley
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   James D. Staley
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    /s/ H.K. DESAIH.K. DesaiChief Executive Officer/s/ DOUGLAS D. NAYLORDouglas D. NaylorInterim Chief Financial Officer