alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
output_FacilityList

FacilityID met_stationrural_urbanmax_dist model_dist radials circles overlap_dist acute hours

01033NEI8522 3000 30 Y

01033NEI8522b 3000 30 Y

01115NEIALT$4622 3000 30 Y

05059NEIART$10783 3000 30 Y

05115NEI3AR05115JW 3000 30 Y

13077NEI8066 3000 30 Y

13133NEI8093 3000 30 Y

17031NEI3IL17031Ale 3000 30 Y

18003NEIIN00286 3000 30 Y

18089NEI3IN18089Jup 3000 30 Y

18093NEI3IN18093Rec 3000 30 Y

18113NEIIN567 3000 30 Y

18169NEI3IN18169Ale 3000 30 Y

18173NEI32661 3500 30 Y

19163NEI12240 3000 30 Y

19163NEI2IA01-089 3000 30 Y

21009NEIKY0090065 3000 30 Y

21031NEIKY2103100 3000 30 Y

21091NEI11360 3000 30 Y

21091NEI11362 3000 30 Y

21101NEI11365 3000 30 Y

21141NEIKY2114100 3000 30 Y

21151NEI3KY21151Nov 3000 30 Y

21227NEIKY22700135 3000 30 Y

26023NEI3MI26023Ale 3000 30 Y

26023NEIMIN5957 3000 30 Y

29009NEI18317 3000 30 Y

29143NEI34464 5000 30 Y

29510NEI3MO29510JW 3000 30 Y

34007NEI3NJ34007Alu 3000 30 Y

36075NEI3NY36075Nov 3000 30 Y

36089NEI39458 3000 30 Y

36103NEI3AL01123Cre 3000 30 Y

39157NEI3OH39157Ale 3000 30 Y

39157NEIOHT$6308 3000 30 Y

42071NEI3PA42071Alu 3000 30 Y

42107NEIPA23-2083 3000 30 Y

45015NEI3SC45015JW 3000 30 Y

45015NEI41217 3000 30 Y

46135NEI790 3000 30 Y

47009NEI10933 3000 30 Y

47009NEI10933b 3000 30 Y

47159NEI3TN47159Wil 3000 30 Y

48029NEI7212 3000 30 Y

48037NEI3TX48067Alu 3000 30 Y

48331NEI6464 6000 30 Y

53007NEI42328 3000 30 Y

53073NEIWA19906 3000 30 Y

54035NEIWV0043 3000 30 Y

55039NEI43018 3000 30 Y

55117NEI3WI55001JL 3000 30 Y

Page 1
output_FacilityList

55117NEIWI4600412 3000 30 Y

Page 2
output_FacilityList

elev multiplier ring1 depdeplphase pdeppdepl vdepvdeplAll_rcpts user_rcpt bldg_dw urban_pop fastall

Y 1 Y Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y Y

Y 1 Y Y

Y 1 Y Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y Y

Y 1 750 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y Y

Y 1 Y Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 500 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y Y

Y 1 Y Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y Y

Y 1 Y Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 800 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y

Y 1 Y

Page 3
output_FacilityList

Y 1 Y

Page 4
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts v. Texas BLC, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00554

- CV

Trial court case number: D

- 1

- GN

- 17

- 002768

Trial court: 250th District Court of Travis County

The motion for en banc reconsideration is denied

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Peter Kelly

____  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Rada ck, and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, Goodman, Hightower,

Landau, Countiss, and Adams.

Date: ___ December 8, 2020

____
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 28, 1997 AND
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 28,
1997 CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 28, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000910721
<NAME> DM MANAGEMENT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,388
<SECURITIES>                                     3,872
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,279
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,936
<PP&E>                                           7,033
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,132
<BONDS>                                          4,446
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,995
<SALES>                                         57,428
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,428
<CGS>                                           25,415
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,870
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  68
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,862
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,116
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,746
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,746
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6808

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus TERRY LEE ROSEBORO, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:00-cr-00014-ALL; 5:06-cv-00055) Submitted: July 25, 2006 Decided: August 3, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry Lee Roseboro, Appellant Pro Se. C. Nicks Williams, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Terry Lee Roseboro seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his 18 U.S.C. § 3661 (2000) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Roseboro has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we construe Roseboro’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims- 3 - based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255 (2000). Roseboro’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
        1350**
 
 In
        connection with the Form 10-QSB of Health Discovery Corporation formerly
        Direct
        Wireless Communications Inc. for the Quarter ended September 30, 2005, as
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
        I, Robert S. Braswell IV, Chief Financial Officer of Health Discovery
        Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
        to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Health
                  Discovery Corporation.
 
 
 Date:
        November 14, 2005
 
 
 /s/
        Robert S. Braswell IV
 Robert
        S.
        Braswell IV
 Chief
        Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1634]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         HONORING ROBERT BERNER

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. LYNN C. WOOLSEY

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Ms. WOOLSEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor Robert Berner, who 
will be retiring after 28 years as Executive Director of the Marin 
Agricultural Land Trust (MALT) in Marin County, CA. Bob's inspiring 
leadership has resulted in the protection of countless family farms and 
ranches and the preservation of thousands of acres of farmland in Marin 
County. Today, largely through his guidance, MALT is recognized as a 
national leader in agricultural land preservation.
  Prior to MALT, Bob was Executive Director of The Foundation for San 
Francisco's Architectural Heritage and Vice-President of Finance at The 
Nature Conservancy. He is a founding member and current co-chair of the 
California Council of Land Trusts and a member of the steering 
committee of the Bay Area Open Space Council. He holds a law degree 
from Duke University and an MBA from the Wharton School at the 
University of Pennsylvania.
  MALT was founded in the 1970s by a unique alliance of 
environmentalists and ranchers who realized that development proposals 
for Marin County would destroy cherished farmland and beautiful open 
space. Bob took the reins at a time when much of the economic focus in 
the region and the nation had been on non-agricultural development. He 
proved that it is possible to foster growth and economic opportunity in 
agriculture. Thanks to his efforts, Marin is and will continue to be, 
home to renowned dairy, meat, and organic produce which are served in 
the Bay Area and beyond.
  Mr. Speaker, Robert Berner's diligent work has helped establish an 
effective national model for agricultural land preservation, enabled 
countless Marin County farms to thrive, and provided consumers with 
organic, local produce, dairy, and meat. Please join me in honoring his 
distinguished career.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1512-E1513]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

IN HONOR OF THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE MONTEREY COUNTY FREE LIBRARIES

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. SAM FARR

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 13, 2012

  Mr. FARR. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the 100th anniversary of 
the Monterey County Free Libraries. Author and broadcaster Studs Terkel 
once said, ``All you need in life is truth and beauty and you can find 
both at the Public Library.'' Well, for the last century, Monterey 
County's library system has offered up beauty and truth in abundance.
  On August 6, 1912, the Monterey County Board of Supervisors 
established the Monterey County Free Libraries. On September 2, 1913 
Miss Anne Hadden started as the first County Librarian. In her first 
six months she opened five branches. By 1923 she and others had 
established branches in 105 locations. Some were simple reading rooms 
housed in private residences, schools, and stores; the Big Sur branch 
was located in the Post Office. In those early days Miss Hadden used 
every means at her disposal to distribute books to the far corners of 
the county: by train, by car, and even on foot. Indeed, a photograph of 
Anne Hadden delivering books by burro has become an iconic image of the 
whole library system.
  Today, the Free Libraries still function under the authority of the 
Monterey County Board of Supervisors. The County Librarian operates 
seventeen branch libraries, two bookmobiles, a library-by-mail program, 
and also maintains collections in schools. Books for all ages and 
interests in regular and large print, books on tape, CD's, DVD's and 
videos, magazines, electronic resources and materials in English, 
Spanish, Korean and Vietnamese are available to the community. The 
libraries also maintain ten homework centers and a literacy program. 
All together they provide services to 220,000 people over 3,250 square 
miles.
  Mr. Speaker, I congratulate the Free Libraries on their 100th 
anniversary and know that I speak for the whole House in saluting them 
on this joyous occasion.

[[Page E1513]]

                          ____________________
```
SERVED: JANUARY 24,2012 

•..:f V^Mt^J T Of 

••..'•oKri OiiTRAnOiN';-

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKY KING, INC. 

FA A DOCKET No. CP11SOOOOO 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMSNo. FAA-20M-0670 

ORDER TO RESPONDENT TO SHOW CAUSE 

The Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") on January 18, 2012, filed 

a Motion to Compel ("Motion"). The Motion avers that Complainant's "First Requests 

for Discovery" of November 1, 2011, responses to which were due on or about December 

1, 2011, has, even after Complainant's extension of its deadline to January 5, 2012, yet to 

generate any response. 

WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. On or before February 10, 2012, Respondent shall file a response to this 

Order stating why the relief requested in Complainant's Motion should not 

be granted; 

2. On or before February 10, 2012, Respondent shall fully and completely 

answer each of Cotnplainant's discovery requests; and 

3. Absent full and complete responses to Ordering paragraphs land 2, 

Respondent may be sanctioned including, but not limited to, allegations in 

the Complaint may be deemed admitted; Respondent may be precluded 
from introducing any evidence at the hearing other than his own 

testimony; his Request for Hearing may be dismissed; and/or a Default 

Judgment may be entered against Respondent in the full amount of the 

fine requested by the Complainant in its Complaint. 

U.S. Administraljvc Law Judge 

Attachment ^ Service List 
FDMS No. EAA-20II-0670 

(Civil Penally Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WIOO0' 

ONE COPY 

Stephen A. Badger, VP Flight Operations and Director 

of Safety and Security 

Sky King, Inc. 

3600 Power Inn Road, Suite H 

Sacramento, CA 95826 

TEL: 916-454-2400 

FAX: 916-737-8960 

Gerald A. Ellis, Complainam's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southern Region, ASO-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX; 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, 

Adminislralive Low Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. DcpartmeiU of Tratispoiiauon 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 Fax 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, ii.se the following address: Federal 

Aviation Adrninislralion. 800 Independence Avenue. S.W.'. Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI00U. Washington. 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk. AGC-430.
Certificate of Formation of Carrizo (Niobrara) LLC



 Exhibit 4.12 
 State of Delaware 
 Secretary of State 

Division of Corporations 
 Delivered 05:56 PM 06/27/2011 
 FILED 05:37 PM 06/27/2011 

SRV 110767038 – 5002940 FILE 
 CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION 
 OF 

CARRIZO (NIOBRARA) LLC 
 This Certificate of Formation of Carrizo (Niobrara) LLC (the “Company”) is being executed and filed by the undersigned authorized person for the purpose of forming a limited liability company
under the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act. 
 Article One 

The name of the Company is Carrizo (Niobrara) LLC. 
 Article Two 
 The address of the registered office of the Company in the
State of Delaware is 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware 19801, and the Company’s registered agent at that address is The Corporation Trust Company. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Formation this 27th day of June, 2011. 

 

			
	By:	 	/s/ Marcus Bolinder
		 	 Marcus Bolinder
 Authorized
Person
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Qaurterly Report of Feel Golf
Co., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lee Miller, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial
Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78 m or 78o (d));
      and2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Feel Golf
      Co., Inc.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  FEEL GOLF
CO., INC.
 /s/ 
      Lee MillerLee
      Miller


Chief
      Executive OfficerChief
      Financial Officer






Date: August
18, 2009
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-50123

Conference Calendar

__________________

EUGENE SPENCER, JR.,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHARLES T. CONAWAY ET AL.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-95-CV-967

- - - - - - - - - -

June 25, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eugene Spencer, Jr., Texas inmate #245350, appeals the

district court's dismissal, with prejudice, of his civil rights

complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record, the

district court's opinion, and appellant's brief and discern no

reversible error.

"[C]ivil tort actions are not appropriate vehicles for

challenging the validity of outstanding criminal judgments." 
No. 96-50123

-2-

Heck v. Humphrey, 114 S. Ct. 2364, 2372 (1994). In order to

recover damages for harm caused by actions whose unlawfulness

would render a conviction or sentence invalid, the "plaintiff

must prove that the conviction or sentence has been reversed on

direct appeal, expunged by executive order, declared invalid by a

state tribunal authorized to make such determination, or called

into question by a federal court's issuance of a writ of habeas

corpus." Id. Spencer's claims call into question the validity

of his conviction and sentence and may not be considered in a

civil rights action under the rule in Heck because Spencer has

not demonstrated that his conviction and sentence have been

invalidated.

This appeal is frivolous and therefore is DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Spencer than any additional

frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of

sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Spencer is further cautioned to

review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously

decided by this court.

APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 13, 2021

NO. 03

- 16

- 00041

- CV

John J. Gorman IV, Appellant

v.

Westech Capital Corp., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN , TR IANA, AND KELLY

DISMISSED ON J OINT MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order s igned by the tr i a l court on January 7, 2016

. The

p arties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion , the

Court agrees that the motion should be granted . Therefore, the Court grants the motion and

dismiss es the appea l

. A ppellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and

in the court below.
Letter from KPMG, LLP



 EXHIBIT 4.1 
  

April 11, 2005 
  
 Securities and Exchange Commission 
 Washington, D.C. 20549 
  
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
  
 We were previously principal accountants for Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. (the Company) under the date of April 4, 2005, we reported on the consolidated financial
statements of the Company as of and for the years ended January 3, 2005 and December 29, 2003, and management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of January 3, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of January 3, 2005. On April 5, 2005, our appointment as principal accountants was terminated. We have read the Company’s statements included under Item 4.01 of its Form 8-K dated April 5, 2005, and we agree with such
statements, except that we are not in a position to agree or disagree with any of the statements made under Item 4.01(b). 
  
 Very truly yours, 
  
 /s/ KPMG LLP