alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofNational RV Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Bradley C. Albrechtsen, Chief Executive Officerand President of the Company, and Thomas J. Martini, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Bradley C. Albrechtsen |                      | /s/ Thomas J. Martini |   |
|----------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Bradley C. Albrechtsen     | Thomas J. Martini         |
| Chief Executive Officer    | Chief Financial Officer   |
| and President              | (Principal Accounting and |
| October 5, 2005            | Financial  Officer)       |
|                       | October 5, 2005           |

 

1

----
Exhibit
32.1








Certification
of Co Chief Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)







In
connection with the Annual Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.







Date:  March
17, 2008







/s/
Erwin Haitzmann


Erwin
Haitzmann


Co Chief
Executive Officer
# FY 2019 - Appalachian Regional Commission

- County Economic Status in Appalachia, FY 2019 This map shows ARC’s economic classification of the 420 counties in the Appalachian Region for FY 2019 (October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2019). The post County Economic Status in Appalachia, FY 2019 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 15, 2018

No. 04-18-00669-CV

Sandra Ann ZARATE,

Appellant

v.

Sergio Rene ZARATE,

Appellee

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 04-10-20415-MCVAJA

Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The court reporter has filed a notice of late record stating appellant has not requested and 

arranged to pay for the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(b)(1) (“At or before the time 

for perfecting the appeal, the appellant must request in writing that the official reporter prepare 

the reporter’s record.”); id. R. 35.3(b)(2), (3) (providing the court reporter is not required to file a 

reporter’s record unless the appellant has requested the reporter’s record and “the party 

responsible for paying for the preparation of the reporter’s record has paid the reporter’s fee, or 

has made satisfactory arrangements with the reporter to pay the fee, or is entitled to appeal 

without paying the fee.”). 

We order appellant to provide written proof to this court by October 25, 2018 that (1) the 

reporter’s record has been properly requested, and (2) either paid or arranged to pay the 

reporter’s fee or is entitled to the record without prepayment of the reporter’s fee. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 20.1, 34.6(b)(1), 35.3(b). If appellant fails to provide such proof by the date ordered, 

appellant’s brief will be due thirty days after the clerk’s record is filed, and the court will only 

consider those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record 

for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of October, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1465 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 267
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1465

                      To extend au pair programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 11, 1995

    Mr. Helms (for himself, Mr. Dodd, and Mr. Kerry) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Foreign Relations

                           December 12, 1995

                Reported by Mr. Helms without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                      To extend au pair programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AU PAIR PROGRAMS.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 8 of the Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship Act of 
1990 (Public Law 101-454) is repealed.
    (b) Authority for Au Pair Programs.--The Director of the United 
States Information Agency is authorized to continue to administer an au 
pair program, operating on a world-wide basis, through fiscal year 
1999.
    (c) Report.--Not later than October 1, 1998, the Director of the 
United States Information Agency shall submit a report regarding the 
continued extension of au pair programs to the Committee on Foreign 
Relations of the Senate and the Committee on International Relations of 
the House of Representatives. This report shall specifically detail the 
compliance of all au pair organizations with regulations governing au 
pair programs as published on February 15, 1995.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 267

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1465

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

                      To extend au pair programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 12, 1995

                       Reported without amendment
```
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForms S-8 No. 333-42533, No. 333-86001, No. 333-62734and No. 333-100011 (pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan and the1998 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, and the 2002 Stock OptionPlan), and Forms S-3 No. 333-33710, No. 333-51250, No. 333-53538,No. 333-112513 and No. 115281 of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ofour report dated February 20, 2004 with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. as of December 31,2003 and for the two years then ended included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A)for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ ERNST& YOUNG LLP

PaloAlto, California

April 14, 2005

----
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MAX RE CAPITAL LTD.



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 of Max Re Capital Ltd. (the Issuer).



I, Robert J. Cooney, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that:



| | (i) |  | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Dated: August 4, 2003



/s/ Robert J. CooneyName: Robert J. Cooney
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1557]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 TRIBUTE TO THREE OLYMPIC MEDALISTS KESHIA BAKER, NATALIE COUGHLIN AND 
                             HEATHER PETRI

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. JOHN GARAMENDI

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 19, 2012

  Mr. GARAMENDI. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to congratulate three local 
heroes from the 10th District of California, Keshia Baker, Natalie 
Coughlin and Heather Petri. At the 2012 London Olympic Games Keshia won 
the gold medal in the Women's 4x400m relay, Natalie won the Bronze in 
the Women's 4x100m freestyle swimming relay and Heather won gold as 
part of the Women's Water Polo team. These three inspiring women having 
assured places on the storied list of Olympians from our district, and 
have become role models of our community.
  Keshia was a first time Olympian in London but you wouldn't know by 
the way she carried herself. Keshia graduated from Fairfield High in 
2006 whereupon she attended the University of Oregon. In between 
setting athletic records at Oregon, Keisha started her own non-profit 
supporting young disadvantaged student athletes as well as graduating 
with Honors in Psychology.
  Natalie is an Olympic veteran and a national household name who has 
performed at an amazing level as a member of the US Women's swimming 
team since 2004. Winning her 12th medal at the London games, Natalie 
has tied two others as the most highly decorated female Olympians in 
American history. As a lifelong resident of Vallejo and a graduate of 
my alma mater CAL, Natalie is and will continue to be an inspiration 
within our community.
  Heather, a four-time Olympic veteran, has competed at a winning level 
for the past 12 years. Due in no small part to her excellent leadership 
and tenacity, the US Women's Water Polo Team earned gold in London. 
This was her fourth Olympic medal. Even at a young age Heather was an 
exceptional athlete; a founding member of her high school team, and a 
highly decorated college athlete from CAL, her success has been no 
surprise to our community.
  Olympians are more than just exceptional athletes, they are 
exceptional Americans. Their ability to hurdle any obstacle, to apply 
hard work, dedication and perseverance to their goals embodies the best 
of the American spirit and the American people; they are role models to 
us all and ambassadors for America and we thank them.

                          ____________________
```
Order entered June 18, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00032-CV

E-SYSTEMS CORPORATION, RONALD FINLAYSON, AND DAVID ZISSKIND,

Appellants

V.

LIQUID CAPITAL EXCHANGE, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-16142

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s June 15, 2018 unopposed motion for second extension of 

time to file brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than July 23, 

2018. We caution appellee that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
#### SAUTBINE v. PIERCE.

No. 35832.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Feb. 9, 1954.

Kennedy & Kennedy, Oklahoma *City,*for plaintiff in error.

CORN, Justice.

Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered in favor of defendant in the trial court and on April 18, 1953 plaintiff in error filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allega*1007tions of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances as stated by this court in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okl. 583, 99 P.2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause will be reversed and remanded, with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded with directions to vacate the judgment entered for defendant in the trial court and to grant a new trial.

HALLEY, C. J., JOHNSON, V. C. J., and WELCH, DAVISON, O’NEAL, WILLIAMS and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur.
Registered Office.
 Other Offices.
   Time and Place of Meetings
 Annual Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Notice




---



##### 



Quorum
 Voting
 Method of Voting
 Action Without Meeting
 2




---



##### 



Responsibilities
 Number; Term
 Vacancies; Increases
 Place of meetings
 3




---



##### 



Regular Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Quorum; Majority Vote
 Minutes
 Committees
 Committee Minutes
 Action Without Meeting
 4




---



##### 



Method
 Waiver
   Number
 5




---



##### 



Appointed Officers
 Removal
 Compensation
 Duties
       6




---



##### 



Checks
 Fiscal Year
 Telephone and Similar Meetings
 Distributions and Share Dividends
 Amendment of Bylaws
 7
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4952 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4952

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a study 
    and submit a report on the effects of the inclusion of quality 
increases in the determination of blended benchmark amounts under part 
                       C of the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Seniors Access to Quality 
Benefits Act''.

SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF BLENDED BENCHMARK AMOUNT STUDY.

    (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the 
inclusion of quality increases in the determination of blended 
benchmark amounts under section 1853(n)(4) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395w-23(n)(4)) undermines the goal of delivering high-
quality care under the Medicare program under title XVIII of such Act.
    (b) Study and Report.--Not later than one year after the date of 
enactment of this section, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, 
in consultation with relevant stakeholders, shall conduct a study and 
submit to Congress a report on the effects of the inclusion of quality 
percentage increases under section 1853(n)(5) of such Act in the 
determination of blended benchmark amounts under section 1853(n)(4) of 
such Act. Such study and report shall include an analysis of the 
following:
            (1) The authority of the Secretary to remove such increases 
        from the determination of such amounts.
            (2) The effects of including such increases in the 
        determination of such amounts on Medicare Advantage 
        organizations (including the effects on any contracts entered 
        into by such organizations).
            (3) The financial impact of including such increases in the 
        determination of such amounts by county.
            (4) The effects of including such increases in the 
        determination of such amounts on individuals enrolled in a plan 
        under part C of title XVIII of such Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4952

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a study 
    and submit a report on the effects of the inclusion of quality 
increases in the determination of blended benchmark amounts under part 
                       C of the Medicare program.
```
#### WILBUR NAUMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CENTRAL & LAFAYETTE REALTY COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Argued November 22, 1948

Decided November 29, 1948.

*Mr. Harry Green*argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant *(Messrs. Mints & Herships,*attorneys).

*Mr. George F. Lahey, Jr.,*argued the cause for the defendant-respondent.

Per Curiam.

The judgment will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Burling in the court below.

*For affirmance:*Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Oliphant, Waoiieneeld and Ackerson—4.

*For reversal:*Justice ITeher—1.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105·3901

OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR May 21, 20lO Benjamin H. Grumbles, Director Arizona Department ofEnvironmental Quality 1110 W. Washington St. Phoenix, AZ 85007 RE: PMIO National Ambient Air Quality Standard in Phoenix Request for Concurrence for Treatment as "Exceptional Events" DearMr. Grumbles: This letter responds to the Arizona Department ofEnvironmental Quality (ADEQ) submittals refarding exceedances ofthePMIO National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) at the W. 43 f Ave. monitor inPhoenix on the following days in 2008: March 14, April 30, May 21, and June 4. ADEQ has requested that EPA exclude these exceedances from consideration when determining whether the Phoenix area is on track to comply with the PM10 NAAQS bythe end of2010. Ourresponse to ADEQ'srequest is governed bythe "Treatment ofData Influenced by Exceptional Events" rule (72 FR 13560, March 22,2007). After careful consideration ofthe informationprovided, wehave decided to disapprove ADEQ's request to treat these exceedances as due to exceptional events. The basis for our decision is set forth inthe enclosed technical support document. Ifyou have any questions orwish to discuss this matter further, please have your staff contact Deborah Jordan, Director oftheAir Division at (415) 947-8715.

Enclosures
cc: Dennis Smith, Executive Director, Maricopa Association ofGovernments Max Porter, Acting Director, Air Quality, Department, Maricopa County Philip McNeely, Environmental Programs Manager, City ofPhoenix IraDomsky, Acting Air QualityDivision Director, ADEQ
Printed on Recycled Paper
**32.2
      SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**





CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund
      IV, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Kimberly A. Springsteen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of  my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/Kimberly
                A.
                SpringsteenKimberly
                A. SpringsteenPrincipal Financial
                OfficerMay
                15, 2007
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 12, 2013

t0409 

# Order

April 12, 2013

143342 (100)

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF LYON,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 143342

COA: 294074

Oakland CC: 2007

- 083871

- CC

McDONALD’S USA, L.L.C.,

Defendant,

and

MILFORD ROAD EAST DEVELOPMENT

ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.,

Intervening Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration is considered, and it is

DENIED. We reaffirm the principle stated more than 100 years ago in Peoples v Evening

News Ass’n , 51 Mich 11, 21 (1883), that “rehearing will not be ordered on the ground

merel y that a change of members of the bench has either taken place, or is about to

occur.” The same is true for reconsideration. Likewise, we elect to apply MCR

2.119(F)(3) to these cases, which states, “[A] motion for rehearing or reconsideration

which mere ly presents the same issues ruled on by the court, either expressly or by

reasonable implication, will not be granted.” MCR 2.119(F)(3). Instead, the moving

party must demonstrate “a palpable error by which the court and the parties have been

misled and show that a different disposition of the motion must result from correction of

the error.” Id . In this case, the moving party has failed to satisfy either of these

requirements and has, therefore, failed to demonstrate grounds for reconsideration.

Fu rther, the Court has published for comment proposed amendments of MCR

7.313(E) and MCR 7.313(F) to incorporate into the Court’s rules the standards set forth

in MCR 2.119(F)(3) with regard to motions for rehearing and reconsideration. The

publication orde r that contains the proposed rule changes is attached.