alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1601/2006

of 26 October 2006         

on the issue of rice import licences for applications lodged in the first 10 working days of October 2006 under Regulation (EC) No 327/98

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 327/98 of 10 February 1998 opening and providing for the administration of certain tariff quotas for imports of rice and broken rice (2), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,

Whereas:

Examination of the quantities for which import licence applications for rice have been submitted for the October 2006 tranche shows that licences should be issued for the quantities applied for multiplied, where appropriate, by a reduction percentage, and the final percentage take-up of each quota in 2006 should be communicated,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Import licence applications for the tariff quotas for rice opened by Regulation (EC) No 327/98, submitted in the first 10 working days of October 2006 and notified to the Commission, shall be subject to percentage reduction coefficients as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

2.   The final use of the quotas concerned for 2006, in percentage terms, is set out in the annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 October 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 October 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 247/2006 (OJ L 42, 14.2.2006, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 37, 11.2.1998, p. 5. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 965/2006 (OJ L 176, 30.6.2006, p. 12).

----

ANNEX

Reduction percentages to be applied to quantities applied for under the tranche for October 2006 and quota use for 2006:

----
#### Richard Zow, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

1. The evidence examined shows a question for the jury as to the accused being free from fault in bringing on the difficulty.

2. In defining manslaughter, the court commits no error in first defining murder.

Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Volusia County; Jas. W. Perkins, Judge.

Judgment affirmed.

J. *E. Peacock,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*T. F. West,*Attorney General, and *Glenn Terrell,*Assistant, for the State.

Cockrell, J.

Richard Zow was convicted, of manslaughter, and sentenced to the State’s prison for a term of one year.

While there are forty-one assignments of error, they *may*be reduced as we read the brief for the plaintiff in error, to an attack upon the sufficiency of the evidence and a rather general criticism of the court’s charges.

The homicide is clearly shown, but there is some plausibility for the argument that the State’s evidence tended strongly to' show it was done in self-defense. We have given the evidence close scrutiny upon this phase of the argument, and yet feel the conviction may be affirmed.

There was evidence tending to prove that the person slain was an old negro, who was given to profanity when *215drinking, but was perfectly harmless; that he came to the place where Zow and other negroes were assembled, and scattered his profanity around generally, but impartially; that Zow was told he was harmless, but tried to frighten him and, run him' off; that the drunken old negro ran a short distance, then turned and pulled out a pocket knife, without opening it, whereupon Zow turned, ran a few steps, picked up an axe and split open the old, negro’s head. We think there were questions for the jury as to whether Zow was reasonably free from fault in the inception of the difficulty in. arousing the old drunkard’s ire, who had theretofore used only his tongue as a weapon, and as to whether a less violent assault might not reasonably have been used to avoid serious danger to Zow.

We find no fault with the charges of the court. Manslaughter is defined by a process of elimination and the court properly defined the higher degrees of unlawful homicide to enable the jury to know what constituted manslaughter, and we do not see that the court was needlessly verbose; in fact the charges appear all to have been such as have been frequently used and approved in this jurisdiction. In the absence of specific objection or criticism of the charges, we cannot be expected to analyze them now.

Other assignments are either entirely overlooked in the briefs or so lightly touched upon as to be considered abandoned, and require no comment.

The judgment is affirmed.

Shackleford, Whitfield and Ellis, JJ., concur.

Taylor, C. J., absent on account of illness.
H. R. 4946 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1075 North 

Tustin Street in Orange, California, as the ‘‘Specialist Trevor A. Win’E Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST TREVOR A. WIN’E POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1075 North Tustin Street in Orange, California, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Specialist Trevor A. Win’E 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Specialist Trevor A. Win’E Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, John Hiner, President and Chief Executive Officer of Geocom Resources Inc., and Paul Chung, Chief Financial Officer of Geocom Resources Inc., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Geocom Resources Inc. for the interim period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Geocom Resources Inc. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated:  May 15, 2006

/s/ John Hiner

John Hiner

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Paul Chung

Paul Chung

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5142 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5142

  To amend chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, to establish the 
                        style for amending laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2018

Mr. Amash (for himself, Mr. Meadows, Mr. McClintock, Mr. McKinley, Mr. 
Cramer, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. Massie, Mr. Huffman, Mr. Polis, Mr. Jones, 
 Mr. Moulton, Mr. Messer, Ms. Norton, Mr. Brat, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Norman, 
 and Mr. Khanna) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, to establish the 
                        style for amending laws.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Readable Legislation Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. AMENDING LAWS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 115. Amending laws
    ``No section of an Act shall be revised or amended by mere 
reference to it. Every bill or joint resolution which amends an 
existing section of any Act shall set forth the entire section, showing 
the omissions and insertions proposed by appropriate typographical 
devices.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning 
of chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by adding after 
the item relating to section 114 the following new item:

``115. Amending laws.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by it shall take effect on January 
3, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MM2 Group, Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Mark
Meller, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.


                                            Date: November 20, 2006


                                            By /s/ Mark Meller
                                            ---------------------
                                            Mark Meller
                                            President, Chief Executive Officer
                                            and Principal Accounting Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

The following certification accompanies the issuer’squarterly report on Form 10-QSB and is not filed, as provided in Release33-8212.  34-47551 dated April 21, 2004.

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIALOFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying quarterly reporton Form 10-QSB of Coast Bancorp for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, I, BertaOlson, Chief Financial Officer of Coast Bancorp, hereby certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)           suchquarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Coast Bancorp for the quarter ended March31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           theinformation contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Coast Bancorpfor the quarter ended March 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Coast Bancorp.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Coast Bancorp and will be retained by CoastBancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

Dated:  April21, 2004

 
|   | /s/ Berta Olson                                        |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | BERTA OLSON                                            |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

22

----
# C_2010209EN.01003401.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2010 — Shenzhen Taiden v OHIM — Bosch Security Systems (Communications Equipment)

(Case T-153/08) (1)

1

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing communications equipment - Earlier international design - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - No different overall impression - Informed user - Degree of freedom of the designer - Evidence that the earlier design was made available to the public - Article 4(1), Article 6(1)(b) and (2), Article 7(1) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

2010/C 209/49

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Shenzhen Taiden Industrial Co. Ltd (Shenzhen, Guangdong, China) (represented by: M. Hartmann and M. Helmer, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Bosch Security Systems BV (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Gielen, M. Bom and B. van Hunnik, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 February 2008 (Case R 1437/2006-3) relating to invalidity proceedings between Bosch Security Systems BV and Shenzhen Taiden Industrial Co. Ltd.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Shenzhen Taiden Industrial Co. Ltd to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Bosch Security Systems BV for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Shenzhen Taiden Industrial Co. Ltd to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Bosch Security Systems BV for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

---

(1)  OJ C 158, 21.6.2008.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.1  Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.
 /s/ Willem M. Smit

Willem M. SmitChief Executive OfficerPresident and DirectorDate: December 21, 2006
A college completion rate is the percentage of persons ages 25 

and over with a bachelor’s degree or more. The map uses natural 

breaks in the distribution to organize the data into groups of 

common values. 

College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016

(County Rates)

Map Created: July 2018

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2012–2016

0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

5.2% - 14.6%

14.7% - 21.4%

21.5% - 31.8%

31.9% - 51.6%

U.S. average = 30.3%

Appalachian average = 23.2%

Completion Rate

(Natural Breaks Classification)
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, John Hiner, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Geocom Resources Inc. (the Company) for the interim period ended March 31,
2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 20, 2008

/s/ John HinerJohn HinerPresident and
Director(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Geocom Resources
Inc. and will be retained by Geocom Resources Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Trimeris, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert R. Bonczek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ ROBERT R. BONCZEK  
|Robert R. Bonczek      
|                       
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 10, 2005         



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of WVS Financial Corp. (the
Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ David J. BursicDavid J. BursicPresident and Chief Executive
Officer


Date: September 12, 2011



|Note: | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be retained by WVS
Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|----- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

MSHC The Waterton at Cowhorn Creek, LLC, Appellant

No. 06

- 12

- 00056

- CV v.
Donna Miller, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Nellie Mae Jackson, Appellee Appeal from the 5th District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 11C0131

- 005 ). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in part of t he order

of t he court below. Therefore, we reverse the order of the trial court only to the extent it denied

dismissal of Miller ’ s direct liability claims against The Waterton, and we render judgment dismissing those claims. In accordance with our opinion and except to t he specific extent we
reverse the order of the trial court, we sustain the trial court ’ s rulings relative to The Waterton ’ s
motion to dismiss.

We further order that the costs of this appeal be equally split between Appellant and Appellee

.

RENDERED DECEMBER 14, 2012 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 11, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50281

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE ALBERTO GOMEZ-BARRIENTOS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:06-CR-2212-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Alberto

Gomez-Barrientos raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.