alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0105. JESSE R. WALKER, et al. v. DIRECT PROPERTIES, LLC.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following

an adverse ruling, Defendant Jesse Walker appealed the magistrate court’s decision

to the superior court. The superior court ruled in favor of Direct Properties, LLC, and

Walker filed a motion for new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict. On

October 9, 2014, the trial court denied Walker’s motion. On October 20, 2014,

Walker filed this application for discretionary appeal seeking review of the trial

court’s order. We lack jurisdiction.

Generally, an application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days

of entry of the order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). But the underlying

subject matter of an appeal controls over the relief sought in determining the proper

appellate procedure. See Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 467-468 (448 SE2d 192)

(1994). The underlying subject matter of this discretionary application is a

dispossessory judgment. OCGA § 44-7-56, which governs dispossessory actions,

requires that an appeal from a dispossessory ruling be filed within seven days of the

date judgment was entered. Walker filed his application 11 days after entry of the

order he seeks to appeal. The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and

this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. 

See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989).

 Because Walker’s application is untimely, this Court lacks jurisdiction over

this application, which is hereby DISMISSED.

November 17, 2014
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/17/2014
# UAV SPECS

– DJI PHANTOM 2 VISION

Aircraft

SUPPORTED BATTERY - DJI 5200mAh LiPo Battery

WEIGHT (BATTERY & PROPELLERS INCLUDED) - 1242g

HOVER ACCURACY (READY TO FLY) - Vertical: 0.8m; Horizontal: 2.5m

MAX YAW ANGULAR VELOCITY - 200°/s

MAX TILTABLE ANGLE - 35°

MAX ASCENT / DESCENT SPEED - Ascent: 6m/s; Descent: 2m/s

MAX FLIGHT SPEED - 15m/s (Not Recommended)

DIAGONAL MOTOR-MOTOR DISTANCE - 350mm



## Gimbal WORKING CURRENT - Static : 750mA; Dynamic : 900mA

CONTROL ACCURACY - ±0.03°

CONTROLLABLE RANGE - Pitch : -90°

- 0°

MAXIMUM ANGULAR SPEED - Pitch : 90°/s



## Camera OPERATING ENVIRONMENT TEMPERATURE - 0 Ԩ -40 Ԩ

SENSOR SIZE - 1/2.3"

EFFECTIVE PIXELS - 14 Megapixels

RESOLUTION - 4384×3288

HD RECORDING - 1080p30 & 720p

RECORDING FOV - 110° / 85°



## Remote Control OPERATING FREQUENCY - 5.728 GHz

- 5.85 GHz

COMMUNICATION DISTANCE (OPEN AREA) - CE Compliance: 400m; FCC Compliance: 800m

RECEIVER SENSITIVITY (1%PER) -93dBm

TRANSMITTER POWER - CE Compliance: 25mW; FCC Compliance: 100mW

WORKING VOLTAGE - 120 mA@3.7V

BUILT-IN LIPO BATTERY WORKING CURRENT/CAPACITY 3.7V, 2000mAh

# UAV SPECS

– DJI PHANTOM 2 VISION

Range Extender OPERATING FREQUENCY 2412-2462MHz

COMMUNICATION DISTANCE (OPEN AREA) 500-700m

TRANSMITTER POWER 20dBm

POWER CONSUMPTION 2W
parl_ex104.htm


EXHIBIT 10.4


 


 


Via Hand Delivered







June 27, 2011







Mr. Frederick E. Purches


175 East 62nd Street


Apt #17A


New York, NY 10065


 


Reference:  Contract Matters







Dear Fred:







On November 8, 2010 you signed an Employment Agreement with Parlux Fragrances, Inc (“the Employment Agreement”), which was set to expire eleven months later, but not later than November 8, 2011. On May 18, 2011, you signed an Amendment to the Employment Agreement which extended the expiration date of the Employment Agreement to March 31, 2012.







Although there were no other changes as a result of the amendment, this letter will serve as a confirmation that the monthly termination payments of $42,000 originally due to you through November 8, 2011 if terminated prior to November 8, 2011 under section 2 of the Employment Agreement, will be continued through March 31, 2012 in the capacity of Consultant if you are terminated anytime before March 31, 2012.







Should the Board nominate and the shareholders reelect you to the Board to serve until the following annual meeting in October 2012, the Company will continue to engage you, or your affiliate, Cosmix, Inc at a rate of $15,000 per month from April 1, 2012 until the October 2012 annual meeting.







All other terms and conditions outlined in the agreement will be extended through March 31, 2012.







I want to thank you for your dedicated service, contributions and continuing efforts towards the success of the Company.












Sincerely,







/s/ Frank A. Buttacavoli







Frank A. Buttacavoli, Executive Vice President & COO







CC:    Wendy Lizardo, PHR Human Resources Director
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 16028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05800]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8231]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
the Democratic Republic of Congo

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L. 112-74) (``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the 
national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of 
Section 7031(b)(1-2) of the Act with respect to the Democratic Republic 
of Congo and I hereby waive this restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 24, 2012.
Thomas R. Nides,
Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources.
[FR Doc. 2013-05800 Filed 3-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4859 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4859

  To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to allow certain payments 
    made by public service employees to qualify for public service 
                   repayment, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2018

Mr. Foster (for himself, Mr. Meeks, Ms. Judy Chu of California, and Mr. 
   Swalwell of California) introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to allow certain payments 
    made by public service employees to qualify for public service 
                   repayment, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Service Loan Forgiveness 
Inclusion Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. QUALIFYING PAYMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 455(m) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(A) by inserting ``subject to paragraph 
        (5),'' before ``has made''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) First 60 monthly payments.--
                    ``(A) In general.--For the purpose of meeting the 
                requirement under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), 
                the first 60 monthly payments may be payments under a 
                repayment plan under subsection (d)(1) or (g).
                    ``(B) Applicability.--This paragraph shall apply to 
                borrowers who on or after the date of the enactment of 
                this paragraph have made less than 120 monthly payments 
                under paragraph (1)(A).''.
    (b) Notification to Borrowers.--Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Education shall--
            (1) inform each borrower of a loan made under part D of 
        title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087a 
        et seq.) of--
                    (A) paragraph (5) of section 455(m) of the Higher 
                Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)), as amended 
                by this Act; and
                    (B) the effect of such paragraph on loan 
                cancellation under such section 455(m) (20 U.S.C. 
                1087e(m)); and
            (2) provide information to such borrowers on how to change 
        repayment plans.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1557]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  HONORING THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF 
                      ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 332

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. ZOE LOFGREN

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 19, 2012

  Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California. Mr. Speaker, I rise with my fellow 
Congress members Anna Eshoo and Mike Honda to honor the 100th 
Anniversary of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 
Local 332.
  For over a century, the International Brotherhood of Electrical 
Workers Local 332 has worked to ensure the safety and well-being of its 
members.
  Established on August 25, 1912, with only fourteen members, it has 
grown today to include 2,700 men and women striving for the highest 
level of excellence in their trade. Their concern for safety, and 
pursuit for high quality education, led to the creation of one of the 
top electrical training facilities in the United States.
  In fact, these skilled workers have been instrumental in building 
Silicon Valley into the globally renowned location it is today. Members 
of the Local 332 have participated in nearly every major construction 
project in Santa Clara County in the last 100 years; from field-pumps 
and canneries of the early 20th century, to the high tech companies 
that drive Silicon Valley's economy today.
  Just as these tradesmen helped build our homes, schools, hospitals, 
and civic facilities, they also have helped shape our community and 
grow our economy.
  Indeed, Local 332's members contributions extend beyond the workplace 
to building a better community. Its members are active volunteers and 
generous supporters of numerous community and non-profit organizations.
  Their civic work has improved the opportunities and lives of not only 
their own members, but also countless people in Santa Clara County.
  Along with myself, Representatives Anna Eshoo and Mike Honda also 
wish to congratulate the International Brotherhood of Electrical 
Workers on its 100 year anniversary, and commend them for their work on 
behalf of workers' rights, craftsmanship, and their commitment to 
community in Silicon Valley.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
John J. Coughlan, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lawson Software, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: January 8, 2004                                                      |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ JOHN J. COUGHLANJohn J. Coughlan President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 

41

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Health Discovery Corporation formerly
Direct Wireless Communications Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, I,
Stephen D. Barnhill, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of Health Discovery
Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that; such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended, March 31, 20054, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in such Form 10-QSB for the
Quarter ended, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of Health Discovery Corporation.


/s/ Stephen D. Barnhill, M.D.
----------------------------
Stephen D. Barnhill, M.D.
Chief Executive Officer


                                       16
================================================================================

Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the amended  Quarterly  Report of Hybrid  Technologies,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Holly Roseberry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge:  (1) The Report fully  complies
with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

                                           /s/ Holly Roseberry
                                           ---------------------
                                           Holly Roseberry
                                           Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                           Financial Officer

June 13, 2006
# C_2011103EN.01002001.xml

| 2.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2011 — UEFA v Commission

(Case T-55/08) (1)

1

(Television broadcasting - Article 3a of Directive 89/552/EEC - Measures taken by the United Kingdom concerning events of major importance to United Kingdom society - European Football Championship - Decision declaring the measures compatible with Community law - Statement of reasons - Articles 49 EC and 86 EC - Right to property)

2011/C 103/34

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) (Nyon, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Bell, K. Learoyd, Solicitors, D. Anderson QC and B. Keane, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Benyon and E. Montaguti, Agents, assisted by J. Flynn QC and M. Lester, Barrister)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: C. Pochet, Agent, assisted by J. Stuyck, lawyer); United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented initially by: S. Behzadi-Spencer and V. Jackson, and subsequently by S. Behzadi-Spencer and L. Seeboruth, Agents, assisted by T. de la Mare and B. Kennelly, Barristers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2007/730/EC of 16 October 2007 on the compatibility with Community law of measures taken by the United Kingdom pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (OJ 2007 L 295, p. 12).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 107, 26.4.2008.

1

---
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bernard, Allan & Edwards, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the "Report"),
I, Michael McLaughlin, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18  U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.

/s/ Michael McLaughlin
Michael McLaughlin
President
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)

November 12, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version
of this written statement has been  provided to the Company and will be
retained  by the  Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEXAS ELPASO, TEXAS

I N THE I NTEREST OF J.A.G., A MI NOR CHI L D. § § § § § § No . 0 8- 08 -0 02 67 -C V

Appea l from the 388th J udicial District Court of El Pa so County , T e xas (TC# 91-13155)

M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION Pe nd ingbe fo re the Court is a mot ion by Ap pe lla nts Ma ri a Es the r M or a

and Th e El Pa so County Domestic Relations Off

ice to dismiss thi s appea l pursuant to T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(a) (2). The pa rties re prese nt that neither Appe llants desire to pursue the appe al. Appellants have complied with the re quirements of Rule 42.1( a)( 2). Having c onsidered the motion, we are of the op ini on that it sh ou ld b e g ra

nte d. Th e a

pp e a l is dis mis se d. Cos ts w ill be ta xed a g a ins t Appellants. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(d).

November

6, 2008 DAVI D WEL L I NGTON CHEW, C hief Just ice B e f o r e C h e w , C
. J. , M c C l u r e , a n d C ar r , JJ.
Exhibit 32.2




                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


         The  undersigned   executive   officer  of  WVS  Financial  Corp.  (the
"Registrant")  hereby certifies that the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained
therein fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.




                                                /s/ Keith A. Simpson
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Keith A. Simpson
                                                Vice-President and
                                                Chief Accounting Officer


Date: September 25, 2006


Note:   A signed original  of this written statement  required by Section 906 of
        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will
        be  retained  by WVS Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
        Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.