alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.51

 

URANIUM RESOURCES, INC.

AND

DONALD C. EWIGLEBEN

AMENDMENT #1

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

January 2, 2012

 

This Amendment #1 to Employment Agreement (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of January 2, 2012 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Uranium Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation (hereafter “Company”), and Donald C. Ewigleben (hereafter “Executive”).

 

RECITALS

 

A.                                   The Company and Executive have heretofore entered into an employment agreement dated September 3, 2009 (the “Original Agreement”).

 

B.                                     The Company and Executive desire to amend the Original Agreement in certain respects and to evidence that amendment by entering into this Amendment effective on the Effective Date.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree that effective on the Effective Date, the Original Agreement is amended as follows:

 

1.                                       Section 3(b) is hereby amended by deleting $350,000 and substituting in its place $400,000.

 

2.                                       Section 3(c) is hereby amended by deleting 60% and substituting in its place 100% and deleting 40% and substituting in is place 50%.

 

3.                                       Section 3(d) is hereby amended by deleting in the second sentence thereof the word “this” before Agreement and inserting in its place “the Original.”

 

4.                                       Section 3(e) is hereby amended by deleting from the first sentence thereof the words “from the date of this Agreement” and substituting in their place “September 3, 2009” and inserting the word “original” before and the words “of $350,000 per year” after the words “Base Salary.”

 

5.                                       Section 7(a) (3) is hereby amended by deleting 60% and substituting in its place 100%.

 

6.                                       Section 7(c) (2) is hereby amended by inserting the words “Two year’s” before the word “Bonus.”

 











 

7.                                       Except as amended hereby, the terms of the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Executive and the Company have executed this Amendment to be effective for all purposes as of the Effective Date.

 

 

	
 
    	
EXECUTIVE:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/ Donald C. Ewigleben
    
	
 
    	
Donald C.   Ewigleben
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
URANIUM   RESOURCES, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Paul K. Willmott
    
	
 
    	
Paul K. Willmott, Executive Chairman
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Gammacan International Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Dan J. Gelvan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


Date:  May 9, 2005                                      By: /s/ DAN J. GELVAN
                                                           ------------------
                                                        Dan J. Gelvan
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
|   | (3) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                February 9, 2007 | By:*/s/ CHAIME ORLEV*                  |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                  | ChaimeOrlev                            |
|                                  | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
# 2015 - Appalachian Regional Commission

- High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties.The post High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties. The post College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average.The post Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties.The post Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties. The post High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties.The post College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average.The post Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
================================================================================


                                  Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tari Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15
         (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
         material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
         of the Company.



Date:  June 17, 2004

                                               /s/ Theodore Tsagkaris
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Theodore Tsagkaris
                                               President, C.E.O. and Director
                                               (Principal Executive Officer)
#### HUMPHREYS v. DAY.

No. 35263.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Jan. 10, 1953.

Rehearing Denied March 24, 1953.

Martin L. Frerichs, Okemah, Leon C. Phillips, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Clyde F. Ross, Okemah, for defendant in error.

BINGAMAN, Justice.

This action was brought by C. R. Hum-phreys against J. H. Day to compel the specific performance of a contract to sell and convey 400 acres of land, possession of which had been delivered to the plaintiff. By cross petition defendant sought to recover possession of the property and damages. From the judgment for the defendant, plaintiff appeals.

By written escrow agreement the defendant agreed to sell the land in question to the plaintiff for a consideration of $14,-000. $500 of the purchase price was deposited in escrow with the deed conveying the property. The escrow contract provided for delivery and examination of abstracts of title and on approval of title provided plaintiff should pay to the escrow bank the further sum of $6,500 in cash and deliver to the “escrow holder a real estate mortgage covering the herein described real esate and promissory note for $7,000, which note shall bear interest at 6 percent per an-num from date thereof, and shall be secured by a real estate mortgage, according to the terms and conditions thereof.” The written escrow agreement appears to be full and complete in every respect except it contains no provision fixing the due date of the $7,-000 promissory note. The trial court permitted the plaintiff to offer parol evidence as to the due date of this note. Plaintiff’s evidence consisted of his own testimony that the $7,000 was to mature in annual installments of $1,000 on October 1st, of each year, beginning on October 1st, after the *997execution of such note and mortgage. The defendant’s testimony directly contradicted the testimony of the plaintiff in that he testified there was no agreement as to the due date of the mortgage.

The plaintiff tendered performance of the agreement in accordance with his version of the maturity date of the mortgage which tender was refused by the defendant.

To entitle the plaintiff to specific performance he must establish that the agreement was definite and certain as to the maturity date or dates of the note in question. Bordner v. Gordon, 94 Okl. 165, 221 P. 50.

The evidence of the parties being sharply in conflict it was for the trial court to determine the credibility of the witnesses and the weight and value to be given their testimony. McAfee v. Harden, 180 Okl. 546, 71 P.2d 463.

 The judgment of the trial court is not clearly against the weight of the evidence and should not be disturbed on appeal. Payne v. Wade, 190 Okl. 222, 122 P.2d 144.

Affirmed.

HALLEY, V. C. J., and CORN, JOHNSON and O’NEAL, JJ., concur.

WELCH and DAVISON, JJ., dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      9
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>           JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                  1599
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                 14668
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>            27325
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       0
<LOANS>                               113957
<ALLOWANCE>                             3521
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        172253
<DEPOSITS>                            128596
<SHORT-TERM>                             128
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                     6566
<LONG-TERM>                            29149
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                3147
<OTHER-SE>                              4667
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>        172253
<INTEREST-LOAN>                        11861
<INTEREST-INVEST>                        955
<INTEREST-OTHER>                        1278
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                       14094
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                      7467
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      2263
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   4364
<LOAN-LOSSES>                          (138)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                         0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         6878
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          287
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>               287
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                             625
<EPS-BASIC>                              0.2
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.2
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                          2.48
<LOANS-NON>                             4188
<LOANS-PAST>                             796
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                          77
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                        3049
<CHARGE-OFFS>                            338
<RECOVERIES>                              53
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                       3521
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                    3521
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                        0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                  500



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6278]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. ISRAEL:
       H.R. 6522.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8 and the 16th Amendment of the United 
     States Constitution
```
<PAGE>   1



                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.13.2

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 2
                                       TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Amendment No. 2" ) is
made and entered into by and between A.J. Nassar ("Executive") and The Maxim
Group, Inc. (the "Company") effective as of the 1st day of January, 1998.

         WHEREAS, Executive and the Company are parties to that certain
Employment Agreement, dated June 4, 1997 (the "Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, Executive and the Company previously amended the Agreement
pursuant to that certain Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated as of
September 25, 1997 ("Amendment No.
1"), and wish to further amend the Agreement as set forth below;

         NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual premises and
representations contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree
to amend the Agreement as follows:

         1. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have
the meaning as set forth in the Agreement.

         2. Section 4.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended, effective as of the
date hereof, by deleting Section 4.1 in its entirety and substituting in lieu
thereof the following new Section 4.1:

                  4.1 Base Salary. During the Term of Employment, Executive
           shall be paid an annual base salary (hereinafter "Base Salary"),
           which shall be paid in equal installments in accordance with the
           Company's normal pay practices, but not less frequently then monthly.
           Executive's Base Salary shall be $600,000. The Board of Directors of
           the Company shall review Executive's Base Salary for the subsequent
           one-year period.

         3. Except as expressly amended in Amendment No. 1 and this Amendment
No. 2, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 2 as
of the date first written above.


                                    "COMPANY"

                                    THE MAXIM GROUP, INC.


                                    By: /s/ M.B. Seretean
                                        -------------------------------
                                        M. B. Seretean

                                    Title:   Chairman

                                    "EXECUTIVE"


                                    By: /s/ A.J. Nassar
                                        -------------------------------
                                        A.J. Nassar
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen UnitedStatesCourthouse

 Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street

 Chicago, Illinois 60604

Office of the Clerk

Phone: (312) 435-5850

www.ca7.uscourts.gov

ORDER

February 23, 2016

 By the Court:

No. 15-2672

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

OTHIENO O. LUCAS, 

Defendant - Appellant

Originating Case Information:

District Court No: 2:06-cr-20028-JES-DGB-1

Central District of Illinois

District Judge James E. Shadid

Upon consideration of the MOTION FOR APPEAL DISPOSITION TO BE FILED

UNDER SEAL filed on February 22, 2016, by the pro se appellant,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The clerk of this court shall maintain

under seal the nonprecedential disposition issued by this court on February 3, 2016.

form name: c7_Order_BTC(form ID: 178)
#### Clara ALEXANDER, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12063.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Oct. 13, 1954.

*722Elmore A. Page, Tulsa, for plaintiff in. error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

POWELL, Presiding Judge.

Mrs. Clara Alexander was charged by an information filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Tulsa County with the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, was tried before a jury, found guilty, and her punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for 30 days.

Petition in error and case made were filed in this court on the 25th day of February, 1954, and under Rule 6 of this court, 22 O.S;A. c. IS, Appendix, a brief was due to be filed not later than March 25th, unless extension of time should be granted. Rule 6 further provides:

> ' “In- misdemeanor cases where no brief is filed by plaintiff in error within' thirty days after filing his petition in error, and no extension of time to-file brief is grantedj the Court may summarily submit the cause without notice to the counsel for plaintiff in error, for decision and without placing the case on the docket for oral argument as provided under Rule 9.”

The above rule was not invoked. It should have been. The case was placed on the docket, in order, for oral argumént on September 29, 1954. , No one appeared. We have nevertheless carefully read the petition in error and the record presented.' We discover no tenable defense. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. See Section 47, Chapter 15, SL.1953, p. 56; Tit. 20 O.S.A. §47.

JONES and BRETT, *JJ.,*concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4574 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4574

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2018

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
       at 108 West Schick Road in Bloomingdale, Illinois, as the 
        ``Bloomingdale Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BLOOMINGDALE VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 108 West Schick Road in Bloomingdale, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Bloomingdale Veterans Memorial Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Bloomingdale Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subscription (a) and (b) of section
1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Vialta, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Form 10-Q)
of the Company fully complies with the financial requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. Dated: May 16, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Didier PietriDidier PietriPresident & Chief Executive Officer