alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6278]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. HUELSKAMP:
       H.R. 6518.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       This legislation is introduced under the authority of 
     Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 and the Tenth Amendment to the 
     United States Constitution. This bill restores the proper 
     balance of power between the federal and state governments as 
     intended under the Tenth Amendment to the United States 
     Constitution by devolving the responsibility of providing 
     food assistance for low income citizens to the states. It 
     reinforces the founding constitutional principle that state 
     governments are properly situated with attending to their 
     citizens' health, safety, and general welfare.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1586]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     CONGRATULATING ANNETTE STASSI

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. RODNEY ALEXANDER

                              of louisiana

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. Speaker, it is with great pride that I rise today 
to congratulate Annette Stassi for being selected Queen Evangeline of 
the International Acadian Festival in Iberville Parish. Annette is a 
17-year-old senior at St. John High School in Plaquemine, La.
  The International Acadian Festival is sponsored by the Knights of 
Columbus, Council #970 of Plaquemine, which is the third oldest Council 
in Louisiana.
  It is always outstanding to see the diligence with which the young 
students of Louisiana work to give back and better their communities. I 
have the highest confidence that Annette will succeed in whatever 
endeavors she pursues.
  I ask my colleagues to join me in passing good wishes to Annette 
Stassi, her family, and the entire International Acadian Festival. 
Annette is truly deserving of this recognition.

                          ____________________
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Gyanendra Patra v. Clare Schoene and Adam E. Hampton

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00277

- CV

Trial court case number: 20

- DCV

- 271333

Trial court: 400 th District Court of Fort Bend County

After appellant Gyanendra Patra filed his appellant’s brief on June 22, 2022,

a ppell ee Clare Schoen e’s brief was initially due on July 22, 2022. Schoene did not file an appellee’s brief by that deadline

. Accordingly, o n October 6, 2022, Schoene was notified that the time for filing her brief had passed, and that failure to file a brief, or motion to

exten d the time to file a brief, by October 17, 2022 may result in the Court setting the appeal for submission without an appellee’s brief.

On October 14, 2022, Schoene filed her “First Motion to Extend Time to File Appellee’s Brief.” In her motion, Schoene requests that the deadline to file her appellee’s brief be extended to November 14, 2022. Schoene states that the extension is requested because her counsel “did not see the notice” advising the parties that appellant had filed his brief on June 22, 2022

, after he was notified multiple times that his appellant’s brief was late and he requested several extensions of the deadline to file his appellant’s brief

. The motion states that counsel for Schoene attempted to confer with counsel for appellant, but at the time of filing the motion, counsel “had not received a response.” See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.1(a)(5).

Schoene’s motion to extend time to file her appellee’s brief is grant ed

. Schoene’s

a ppell ee ’s brief must be filed with this Court on or before November 14 , 2022. N o further
extensions will be considered , and the failure to file a brief by November 14, 2022 will result in the appeal being set for submission without an appellee’s brief

.It i s so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ April Farris

 Acting individually

Date: November 3, 2022
Exhibit 23.1



                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  33-76498)  pertaining to the 1991 Stock Option Plan and Director  Stock
Option Plan of IVI  Publishing,  Inc. of our report  dated  February  12,  1998,
except  for Note 2 as to which the date is April 13, 1998, with  respect  to the
financial statements and schedule of IVI Publishing, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                                      /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 13, 1998
IB 

Union Calendar No. 854 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5025 

[Report No. 115–1104] 

To amend the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Convention Implementation Act to limit the imposition of penalties against a person fishing 

on a United States flag fishing vessel in certain areas of the Pacific 

Ocean based on a report by an observer on such a vessel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2018 

Mrs. RADEWAGEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

DECEMBER 21, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5025 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Convention Implementation Act to limit the imposition of penalties against a person fishing on a United States flag 

fishing vessel in certain areas of the Pacific Ocean based 

on a report by an observer on such a vessel. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5025 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON ENFORCEMENT BASED ON OB4 SERVER REPORTS. 

5 Section 507 of the Western and Central Pacific Fish6 eries Convention Implementation Act (16 U.S.C. 6906) is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION ON ENFORCEMENT BASED ON OB9 SERVER REPORTS.—No person fishing on a United States 

10 flag fishing vessel in the Convention Area shall be subject 

11 to any penalty under this Act or any other law or regula12 tion applicable to such vessels based on a report by an 

13 observer on such a vessel, unless— 

14 ‘‘(1) the observer report is provided to the cap15 tain and the owner of the vessel within 60 days after 

16 the end of the fishing trip; and 

17 ‘‘(2) any enforcement action based on such re18 port is brought within one year after the end of the 

19 fishing trip.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 854 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5025 

[Report No. 115–1104] 

A BILL 

To amend the Western and Central Pacific Fishan observer on such a vessel. areas of the Pacific Ocean based on a report by on a United States flag fishing vessel in certain imposition of penalties against a person fishing eries Convention Implementation Act to limit the 

DECEMBER 21, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5027 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5027

 To amend chapter 77 of title 18, United States Code, to clarify that 
  using drugs or illegal substances to cause a person to engage in a 
  commercial sex act constitutes coercion and using drugs or illegal 
   substances to provide or obtain the labor or services of a person 
                       constitutes forced labor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2018

 Mr. Ratcliffe (for himself and Miss Rice of New York) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend chapter 77 of title 18, United States Code, to clarify that 
  using drugs or illegal substances to cause a person to engage in a 
  commercial sex act constitutes coercion and using drugs or illegal 
   substances to provide or obtain the labor or services of a person 
                       constitutes forced labor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Rights of Those Exploited 
by Coercive Trafficking Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. USE OF DRUGS OR ILLEGAL SUBSTANCES FOR TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS.

    (a) Forced Labor.--Section 1589(a) of title 18, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (4), by striking the comma at the end and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following:
            ``(5) by means of supplying, furnishing, or providing any 
        drug or illegal substance to a person in order to exploit the 
        addiction of the person or cause the person to become addicted 
        to the drug or illegal substance,''.
    (b) Sex Trafficking.--Section 1591(e)(2) of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) supplying, furnishing, or providing any drug 
                or illegal substance to a person in order to exploit 
                the addiction of the person or cause the person to 
                become addicted to the drug or illegal substance 
                (unless the defendant engaged in the conduct as a 
                direct result of being a victim of an offense under 
                this chapter).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bruce Holmes, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 3.)

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Same Memorandum as in *People v Holmes*([appeal No. 2] 175 AD2d 651 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Cayuga County Court, Corning, J. — Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the form 10-QSB of Health Discovery Corporation for
the quarter ended March 31, 2004, I, Robert S. Braswell IV, Chief Administrative
Officer of Direct Wireless, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that;

Such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended, March 31, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and the information contained in such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended, fairly
presents at March 31, 2004, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of Health Discovery Corporation.

/s/ Robert S. Braswell IV
-------------------------
Robert S. Braswell IV
Chief Administrative Officer
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00131-CV

AARON BENBOW

v.

MOHAMMAD AL-BARNAWI

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-CV-61909-5

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal 

are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 12, 2021
ex10-05.htm










Exhibit 10.05


FIRST AMENDMENT TO


PAXTON ENERGY, INC.


SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT


John T. Reed


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT is made as of the 23rd day of December, 2011 between Paxton Energy, Inc., a Nevada corporation with its principal office located at 295 Highway 50, Suite 2, Lake Village Professional Building, Stateline, NV 89449 (Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1148 Zephyr Cove, NV89448-1148) (the “Company”), and John T. Reed, whose address is 858 Old Quarry Road, Larkspur, CA 94918-2218 (the “Subscriber”).


 


Subscriber wishes to increase the amount of his subscription under the Subscription Agreement made as of December 19, 2011 (“the Subscription Agreement”); thus the parties hereby amend the Subscription Agreement so the initial paragraph reads as follows:


 


Subscriber hereby subscribes for and agrees to purchase from the Company an unregistered (restricted) Convertible Unsecured Note in the amount of $12,000.00 along with a Common Stock Purchase Warrant (together, the “Securities”) on the terms set forth in the form of the Convertible Unsecured Note and Common Stock Purchase Warrant provided to Subscriber. Funds in such amount will be wired to the Company per instructions to be provided or will be represented by a check delivered to the Company.


 


The reference on page 2 to the Amount of Investment shall be changed to $12,000.00.


 


All other provisions including the Accredited Investor Questionnaire remain in effect and are confirmed.


 



	  	
Subscriber:


	  	  
	  	
    /s/ John T Reed


	
 

	
John T. Reed






















This First Amendment to Subscription Agreement is agreed to and accepted as of December 23, 2011.


 



	
 

	
PAXTON ENERGY, INC.


	  	  
	
 

	
By: /s/ JAMES E. BURDEN


	  	  
	
 

	
Name: James E Burden


	
 

	
Title:  EVP & Sec’ty
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1618]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      HONORING THE MILITARY SERVICE OF CHARLES ``CHARLIE'' MICHAEL

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. MIKE QUIGLEY

                              of illinois

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. QUIGLEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the long and 
distinguished career of Charles ``Charlie'' Michael. For over 40 years, 
Charlie has served as a soldier in the United States Army, as a 
contractor at the Department of Defense, and as a civilian in the 
Department of the Army.
  Charlie began his career in the United States Army as military 
policeman in 1968, serving in Okinawa, Vietnam, and Washington, DC. 
After separating from active duty in 1972, Charlie attended Lycoming 
College in Williamsport, PA, and earned a Bachelor's Degree in 
psychology. Following graduation from Lycoming, Charlie began working 
as a Family Court Hearing and Enforcement Officer. During that time, he 
also enlisted in the Army Reserve.
  In 1981, Charlie entered the Army Active Guard Reserve Program as an 
executive officer, and held other posts throughout the 1980s. In 1998, 
Charlie retired from the Army Budget Office as the Army Reserve Liaison 
at the rank of Major.
  After retiring from active duty, Charlie became a contractor and 
supported the Army Reserve Operations Division until 2003. Later, he 
became Deputy Division Chief for the Programming and Resource Division 
where he spearheaded significant improvements in readiness levels for 
Army units and individuals.
  I first met Charlie when he arrived in my office in 2009 as an Army 
Fellow. During his time with us, Charlie worked on legislation 
important to veterans like H.R. 4279, which would allow veterans to 
receive educational assistance on an accelerated basis if they met 
certain criteria. Charlie's most important contribution to this office, 
though, may well be the delicious Coca-Cola Cake that he loved to make 
and that we all loved to enjoy.
  As he retires from his long and distinguished career, I am certain 
that Charlie looks forward to moving to South Carolina with his wife 
Diane, and spending more time with his family including his son Brian, 
his daughter Christine, and his grandchildren Kaitlyn, Paige, and 
Samantha.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask my colleagues to join me in recognizing Mr. 
Charles ``Charlie'' Michael and his service to this country in so many 
different capacities. It was an honor to have him work in my office. 
His tireless commitment and dedication to public service and the Armed 
Forces will be missed, and I wish him the best of luck in his future 
endeavors.

                          ____________________
```
1

Aetos Group Inc.

Tony Sauerbrey

5103 Rainflower Cir N

League City TX 77573

Oct 30, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Petition for Amendment to 333 Exemption 11209, Docket number FAA-2014-0629

Dear Sir or Madam:

Aetos Group received FAA Exemption No.11209 on March 13, 2015 authorizing Aetos Group

under section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to operate the Aeryon Sky

Ranger and Aeryon Scout sUAS, for aerial inspections of various infrastructure and equipment.

In this present petition for an amendment to Exemption No. 11209, Aetos Group seeks to

operate two additional sUAS for the same purposes.

Aetos Group seeks to operate the D130 X8 made by Foxtech. The D130 X8 is an electric multirotor sUAS capable of hovering flight with vertical takeoff and landing. The aircraft has a

maximum takeoff weight of 36 pounds and a flight time of 30 minutes. It has an advanced and

proven command and control system with many redundant safety features including the ability

to fly with an inoperative motor. We have attached the Flight Operation Manual on the D130 X8

for more detail.

Additionally, Aetos Group seeks to operate the Iris made by 3DRobotics. The Iris is a small

multi-rotor aircraft weighing under 3 pounds that is also capable of hovering flight with vertical

takeoff and landing. The Iris has a proven track record with advanced safety features and

extensive product support. The aircraft utilizes a small GoPro type camera to collect video and

still imagery. More detailed information on the aircraft is contained in the attached Flight

Operation Manual.
2

Other than the addition of these aircraft, there will be no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public safety that were the basis for the initial grant of exemption.

We trust that we have provided all of the necessary background and information needed to

approve this request. Please contact me if you require any additional information or clarification

Best regards,

Tony Sauerbrey

Vice President

Aetos Group Inc.
#### Herbert HEARD, Petitioner, v. Honorable Sam SULLIVAN, Judge of the District Court of Bryan County, Oklahoma, Respondent.

No. 36767.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Feb. 23, 1955.

Paul & Montgomery, Durant, for petitioner.

Wallace W. Gates, County Atty., Bryan County, Durant, for respondent.

WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice.

This is an original proceeding for a writ of mandamus to require respondent, Hon. Sam Sullivan, Judge of the District Court of Bryan County, Oklahoma, to certify his disqualification in two cases now pending in his court.

The same parties, the same question, and virtually the same factual situation were before this court in Case No. 35,415, styled *709State ex rel. Heard v. Sullivan, Judge, decided Feb. 12, 1952, the opinion therein being reported in 206 Okl. 43, 240 P.2d 1109. The only material difference between that case and the one at bar is that the cited case involved respondent’s refusal to disqualify as trial judge in the ouster proceedings pending against petitioner, whereas the present case involves respondent’s refusal to disqualify in two criminal cases pending against petitioner.

It is suggested that this court has no jurisdiction to issue the writ requested because the cases in which respondent’s disqualification is here sought are criminal cases and by specific statute, 20 O.S. 1951 § 40, the Criminal Court of Appeals has exclusive appellate jurisdiction in criminal cases. Jurisdiction to issue the writ in question, however, is not a matter of appellate jurisdiction, statutory or otherwise. It bears no relation to mere appellate jurisdiction but is a matter of constitutional original jurisdiction exclusively in this court. Sec. 2, Article VII, of the Constitution of this state provides, that the appellate jurisdiction of this court shall extend to all civil cases at law and in equity and that the original jurisdiction of this court shall extend to a general superintending control over all inferior courts and all commissions and boards created by law. The grant of general superintending control over inferi- or courts is in the nature of original jurisdiction, and is separate and distinct from and in addition to the general appellate jurisdiction of this court. In paragraph 3 of the syllabus in State ex rel. Freeling v. Kight, 49 Okl. 202, 152 P. 362, we said:

> “By section 2, art. 7, of the Constitution (section 187, Williams’ Ann. Const.), the Supreme Court is given jurisdiction to exercise a general superintending control over all inferior courts and all commissions and boards created by law, and this jurisdiction is a separate and distinct grant from its appellate jurisdiction.”

Such original jurisdiction must necessarily include the issuance of the writ herein sought.

 On the authority of the case of State ex rel. Heard v. Sullivan, supra, the writ herein sought is granted and the syllabus in that case and the 3rd paragraph in the syllabus of State v. Kight, supra, are hereby adopted as paragraphs 1 and 2, respectively of the syllabus herein.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WELCH, CORN, DAVISON, ARNOLD, HALLEY and JACKSON, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blast Energy Services, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Peterson,
Interim President and CEO and Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
August 14, 2009
  By:
              /s/
      Michael PetersonMichael
      PetersonInterim
      President and CEO(Principal
      Executive
Officer)