alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PROMISSORY NOTE

|I ____________________, A FULLY ACCREDITED INVESTOR UNDER THE      
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|DEFINITION OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AGREE TO LEND VERDISYS,    
|INC. THE SUM OF $____________. THE TERM OF THE LOAN IS FOR ONE YEAR
|FROM THE DATE OF EXECUTION AND THE INTEREST RATE IS 8% SIMPLE      
|INTEREST. THE LOAN ALSO ENTITLES THE LENDER TO A ____% WARRANT     
|COVERAGE, WHICH PROVIDES THEM THE RIGHT TO PURCHASE                
|                                                                   
|COMMON SHARES AT A PRICE OF $_____ PER SHARE AT ANY TIME WITHIN    
|THE TERM OF THIS NOTE. A SEPARATE WARRANT AGREEMENT WILL BE        
|ISSUED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE LOAN.                               
|                                                                   
|THE NOTE MAY BE REPAID AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO ONE YEAR FROM THE      
|DATE OF EXECUTION AT THE OPTION OF THE COMPANY.                    
|                                                                   
|THE PARTIES HERETO EXPRESSLY WAIVE DEMAND, PRESENTMENT FOR         
|PAYMENT, NOTICE OF NONPAYMENT, PROTEST AND NOTICE OF PROTEST.      
|LENDER ASSERTS THAT THEY A FULLY KNOWLEDGABLE OF THE               
|COMPANYS BUSINESS AND HAVE READ ALL AND ANY ASSOCIATED SEC        
|FILINGS, INCLUDING RISK FACTORS.                                   
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|SIGNED                                                             
|                                                                   
|LENDER                                                             
|                                                                   
|DATE                                                               
|                                                                   

---
# Public Outreach - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Keegan Povlsen The post Keegan Povlsen appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Kevin Kilbride The post Kevin Kilbride appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Chris Hodes The post Chris Hodes appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-20-00159-CV

IN RE ROSENBLATT LAW FIRM PC, Brettonwoods Properties LLC, and James D. 

Rosenblatt, Relators

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 6, 2020

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On March 12, 2020, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relators also filed a 

motion for stay of the underlying proceedings pending final resolution of the petition for writ of 

mandamus, which this court granted on March 31, 2020. The real parties in interest filed a 

response. After considering the petition, the response, and the record, this court concludes relators 

are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The stay imposed on March 31, 2020 is lifted. 

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019CI15282, styled Michael H. Schlatter and Jacquelyn R. Schlatter, 

Individually and As Trustees of The Schlatter Family Trust v. Rosenblatt Law Firm PC, Brettonwoods Properties LLC, 

and James D. Rosenblatt, pending in the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Cynthia 

Marie Chapa presiding.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1596-E1597]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  RECOGNIZING THE 90TH ANNIVERSARY OF BISHOP GUILFOYLE CATHOLIC HIGH 
                    SCHOOL IN ALTOONA, PENNSYLVANIA

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. BILL SHUSTER

                            of pennsylvania

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Mr. SHUSTER. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize the 90th 
anniversary of Bishop Guilfoyle Catholic High School in Altoona, 
Pennsylvania.
  Bishop Guilfoyle has been dedicated to the education and development 
of Altoona's youth for nearly a century, and its commitment to 
excellence has helped the school to become a tremendously influential 
institution in our community. The school places a great emphasis on 
instilling a culture of goodness, discipline, and knowledge in its 
students, as evidenced by its valued presence in the Altoona area.
  In 1922, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Altoona and Johnstown 
established Bishop

[[Page E1597]]

Guilfoyle Catholic High School, under its original name of Altoona 
Catholic High School. After the sudden death of Bishop Richard T. 
Guilfoyle in 1957, the school was renamed to honor his compassion for 
the Altoona Catholic students, and his enthusiasm for sports.
  Since its establishment, the school has seen nearly 11,000 of its 
students receive diplomas, many of them matriculating to higher 
education. With this outstanding production, the school has had a 
profound importance in its students' lives, and has helped each of them 
to thrive in our community and beyond.
  Bishop Guilfoyle has achieved numerous accolades, and has developed a 
prestigious academic reputation across the 12 Catholic parishes that it 
serves. The school has continued to add state-of-the-art facilities, 
and has implemented a rigorous academic curriculum, which holds its 
students to the highest of standards, both within the classroom and in 
the community.
  Mr. Speaker, Bishop Guilfoyle's commitment to the education of our 
district's youth has not gone unnoticed. Its faculty's passion for 
cultivating the necessary values to succeed as productive, 
compassionate citizens has earned the school an exemplary reputation in 
Pennsylvania's 9th district. The many proud alumni that are spread 
throughout the world are a testament to the school's celebrated 
achievements and storied tradition as a first-class instructional 
institution.
  As Congressman of the 9th District, I wish Bishop Guilfoyle Catholic 
High School all the best on what is sure to be another productive, 
successful 90 years of education and development.

                          ____________________
```
#### WESTERN FARMERS ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, a Corporation of Anadarko, Oklahoma, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. P. DUNNAM, and Doris Dunnam, Defendants in Error.

No. 36490.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Sept. 27, 1955.

H. C. Ivester, Sayre, Plarry C. Hicks, Hollis, for plaintiff in error.

Oden & Oden, Ryan Kerr, Yates & Braddock, Altus, for defendants in error.

DAVISON, Justice.

Except for the amount of the verdict and judgment and the identity of the land involved and of the defendants, the *733instant case presents generally the same issues as were in cause number 36485, Western Farmers Electric Cooperative v. Yates, 288 P.2d 723. However, the case at bar does not involve exceptional damage to an isolated field as did the Yates case, supra, and consequentially the verdict was materially less. The testimony of the different witnesses as to the amount of damage varied widely, ranging from amounts considerably below the amount'of the judgment to amounts considerably above the same. The clear weight of the evidence, however, amply supported the verdict of the jury and the judgment of the court based thereon.

The same reasoning and rules of law being here controlling, the opinion in said cause number 36485 is adopted as the opinion herein.

Judgment affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and WELCH, CORN, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.

HALLEY, J., dissents.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4851 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 20, 2018 

Received 

AN ACT 

To establish the Kennedy-King National Commemorative Site 

in the State of Indiana, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4851 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kennedy–King Na3 tional Commemorative Site Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 In this Act: 

6 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

7 the Secretary of the Interior. 

8 (2) SITE.—The term ‘‘Site’’ means the Ken9 nedy-King National Commemorative Site as des10 ignated by section 3(a). 

11 (3) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 

12 of Indiana. 

13 SEC. 3. NATIONAL COMMEMORATIVE SITE. 

14 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Landmark for Peace Memo15 rial in Martin Luther King, Jr. Park in Indianapolis, in 

16 the State, is hereby designated as the Kennedy-King Na17 tional Commemorative Site. 

18 (b) AFRICAN AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS NETWORK.— 

19 The Site shall be part of the African American Civil 

20 Rights Network established under Public Law 115–104. 

21 (c) ADMINISTRATION.— 

22 (1) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—The Sec23 retary may enter into cooperative agreements with 

24 appropriate public or private entities for interpreta25 tive and educational purposes related to the Site. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4851 RDS 

1 (2) EFFECT OF DESIGNATION.—The Site shall 

2 not be a unit of the National Park System. 

3 (3) LIMITATIONS.—Nothing in this Act— 

4 (A) authorizes the Secretary to interfere 

5 with the rights of any person with respect to 

6 private property or any local zoning ordinance 

7 or land use plan of the State or any political 

8 subdivision thereof; or 

9 (B) authorizes the Secretary to acquire 

10 land or interests in land through condemnation 

11 or otherwise. 

12 (d) SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.—The Secretary 

13 shall conduct a special resource study of the Site to evalu14 ate the national significance of the Site and determine the 

15 suitability and feasibility of designating the Site as a unit 

16 of the National Park System. The Secretary shall also 

17 consider other alternatives for preservation, protection, 

18 and interpretation of the Site by Federal, State, or local 

19 government entities, or private and non-profit groups. The 

20 study shall be conducted in accordance with section 

21 100507 of title 54, United States Code. Not later than 

22 3 years after the date on which funds are made available 

23 to conduct the study, the Secretary shall submit a report 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 4851 RDS 

1 to Congress that describes the results of the study and 

2 any recommendations of the Secretary. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 19, 

2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1




                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


Our report on the consolidated financial statements of Philadelphia Consolidated
Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries is included on page 24 of this Form 10-K. In
connection with our audits of such financial statements, we have also audited
the related financial statement schedules listed in the index on page 23 of this
Form 10-K.

In our opinion, the financial statement schedules referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information required to be
included therein.



COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


2400 Eleven Penn Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 6, 1998
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies(the “Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ John  Kang                                              |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| John Kang,  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 12,  2005                                            |

 

----
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 0546 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 -NM - 050 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR - M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1514]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             RECOGNIZING THE WORK OF REVEREND RALPH CARNEY

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. ADAM SMITH

                             of washington

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 13, 2012

  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I rise to honor the life and 
work of Reverend Ralph Carney. Since 1999, Father Ralph Carney has 
served as the Catholic Chaplain at Madigan Medical Center in Washington 
State, conducting mass and ministering to both patients and staff. His 
passing is a great loss to the community at Joint Base Lewis-McChord.
  Rev. Carney was born in 1923. During World War II, he was a sailor 
along the South American coast and during his career, would serve in 
the Navy, Air Force, and Army.
  Following World War II, Father Carney became ordained as a Catholic 
priest. Rev. Carney went on to serve as a chaplain for the Air Force 
and Army. In 1964, Rev. Carney went to Vietnam to work with combat 
soldiers. Upon his retirement from the Army, he began working at 
Western State Hospital and after he was a priest at St. John Bosco 
Catholic Church in Lakewood, WA.
  Rev. Carney began working at Madigan Army Medical Center in 1999 and 
continued his work there until his passing on August 26, 2012 at age 
89. He was deeply passionate about serving those who serve our country. 
Never being one to slow down, Rev. Carney continued his work up until 
his last days.
  Mr. Speaker, it is with great honor that I celebrate the life of 
Father Carney. His service to our country and the men and women who 
serve to defend it will not be forgotten.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly reportof Lawson Software, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert G. Barbieri, ExecutiveVice President and Chief Financial and Performance Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ ROBERT  G. BARBIERI                        |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert G. Barbieri                             |
|   | *Executive  Vice President*                    |
|   | *and  Chief Financial and Performance Officer* |
|   |                                           |
|   | April 6, 2005                                  |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND
AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000910639
<NAME> FARADAY FINANCIAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,546
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,792)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (110)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (110)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (110)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1






                         Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Belden Inc. of our report dated January 20, 1999, included in the 1998 Annual
Report to Shareholders of Belden Inc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8) pertaining to the Belden Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (No.
33-66830), the Belden Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (No. 33-83154), the Belden
Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Plan (No.333-11071), and the Belden Inc.
Long-Term Incentive Plan (No. 333-74923) of our report dated January 20, 1999,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Belden Inc.
incorporated herein by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1998.

                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 26, 1999
1 The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-3699

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Ramon T. Morales, also known as * Munchies, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 6, 2006 Filed: October 23, 2006

___________ Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Ramon Morales pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of firearms and to possessing a firearm with an obliterated serial number in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), (k), and 2. Af ter this court vacated his original sentence and remanded for resentencing under United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), the district court 1 resentenced him to concurrent prison terms of 64 months on the first count and 60 months on the second count, to be follo wed by concurrent te rms of two years of-2- supervised release. On appeal, counsel ha s moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the district court erred in applying U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) (4-level enhancement for us ing or possessing any firearm or ammunition in connection withanother felony offense). Specifically, counsel argues that the enhancement is erroneous because it is based on a prior conviction that was unrelated to the instan t offense and the firearms involved. We reject counsel’s argument and affirm. We review de novo the district court’s legal conclusions concerning the application of section 2K2.1( b)(5), and we review the underlying factual findings for clear error. See United States v. Anderson , 339 F.3d 720, 724 (8th Cir. 2003) (standard of review). It is undisputedthat Morales has a prior conviction for aggravated discharge of a firearm, and thus the district court properly concluded that he used “any firearm . . . in connection with anothe r felony offense”; we have expressly held that section 2K2.1(b)(5) app lies for other felony offenses that occurred distinct from the offense of conviction and that “the firearm used in another felony need not be the same firearm involved in the offense of conviction.” See United States v. Davis , 360 F.3d 901, 902-04 (8th Cir. 2004). After our review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________