CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM – Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District

Rule No(s): 1151 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: June 19, 2012

Rule Title(s): Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations

Date Submitted to ARB: July 10, 2012

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): July 20, 1999

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Sheri Haggard Phone Number: (760) 245-1661 x1864 E-mail Address: shaggard@mdaqmd.ca.gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Rule 1151 was proposed for amendment to modify the coat ing categories and VOC limits in accordance with the

applicable California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) S uggested Control Measure for Automotive Refinishing

Coatings (SCM) and the Air Toxic Control Measure for Emissions of Hexavalent Chromium and Cadmium from

Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coatings (ATCM) (Title 17 CCR, section 93112), as well as the federal

requirements of National Emission Standards for Haza rdous Air Pollutants: Paint Stripping and Miscellaneous

Surface Coating Operations at Area Sources (Subpart HHHHHH), and all applicable Control Techniques

Guidelines (CTGs) and Alternative Control Technologies (ACTs). This amendment also ensured that the most

readily available, feasible and cost-effective local c ontrol measures for Particulate Matter (PM) are being

implemented for sources subject to this rule as pursuant to the provisions of former Health & Safety Code

§39614(d)..

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):chromium, lead, manganese,

nickel, and cadmium, hexavalent chromium, methylene chloride.

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, w ill result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach referenc e(s) for emission factor(s)

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showi ng how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP fo r this Source Category: No change.

Inventory Year Used to Calcul ate Changes in Emissions: N/A Area Affected: Entire District.

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) : No change.CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SI P for the Control Measure: No change.

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any):

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed):

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 T PY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 65

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0 %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) :

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) C of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achievi ng Emission Reductions are:

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): (C)(1),(2),(3), and (7) Work Practice Standards in Secti on(s): (C)(4), (5), (6), (7), and (8)

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): (E) and (F) Reporting Requirements in Section(s):5/1/2002 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 3

(Electronic Format)

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: N/A