This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains documents other than rules or

proposed rules that are applicable to the

public. Notices of hearings and investigations,

committee meetings, agency decisions and

rulings, delegations of authority, filing of

petitions and applications and agency

statements of organization and functions are

examples of documents appearing in this

section.

Notices Federal Register

899 

Vol. 89, No. 5 

Monday, January 8, 2024 

1See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe 

from the Sultanate of Oman, Pakistan, and the 

United Arab Emirates: Amended Final Affirmative 

Antidumping Duty Determination and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 91906 (December 

19, 2016) (Order). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review and Join Annual 

Inquiry Service List, 87 FR 73752, (December 1, 

2022). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

7060 (February 2, 2023). 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Selection of Respondents 

for Individual Examination,’’ dated March 14, 2023, 

Continued 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–41–2023] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 277—Western 

Maricopa County, Arizona; Withdrawal 

of Application for Expansion (New 

Magnet Site) Under Alternative Site 

Framework 

Notice is hereby given of the 

withdrawal of the application submitted 

by the Greater Maricopa Foreign Trade 

Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 277, 

requesting authority to expand its zone 

under the alternative site framework to 

include a new magnet site in El Mirage, 

Arizona. The application was docketed 

on June 26, 2023 (88 FR 42290, June 30, 

2023). The withdrawal was requested by 

the grantee on January 2, 2024, 

following notification pursuant to 15 

CFR 400.33(e)(1) of the examiner’s 

preliminary recommendation not to 

approve the application. 

Dated: January 2, 2024. 

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2024–00088 Filed 1–5–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[Application No. 05–2A001] 

Export Trade Certificate of Review 

ACTION: Notice of relinquishment of the 

Export Trade Certificate of Review for 

Central America Poultry Export Quota, 

Inc. (‘‘CA–PEQ’’), Application No. 05– 

2A001. 

SUMMARY: The Secretary of Commerce, 

through the Office of Trade and 

Economic Analysis (‘‘OTEA’’) of the 

International Trade Administration, has 

received notice of the relinquishing of 

an Export Trade Certificate of Review 

(‘‘Certificate’’). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joseph Flynn, Director, OTEA, 

International Trade Administration, 

(202) 482–5131 (this is not a toll-free 

number) or email at etca@trade.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of 

the Export Trading Company Act of 

1982 (15 U.S.C. 4011–21) authorizes the 

Secretary of Commerce to issue Export 

Trade Certificates of Review. An Export 

Trade Certificate of Review protects the 

holder and the members identified in 

the Certificate from State and Federal 

government antitrust actions and from 

private treble damage antitrust actions 

for the export conduct specified in the 

Certificate and carried out in 

compliance with its terms and 

conditions. The regulations 

implementing Title III are found at 15 

CFR part 325. Pursuant to 15 CFR 

325.15, a Certificate holder may 

relinquish a Certificate at any time 

through written notice to the Secretary. 

The Certificate will cease to be effective 

on the day the Secretary receives the 

notice. 

Summary of Action 

On December 5, 2023, CA–PEQ 

relinquished its Certificate (Application 

No. 05–2A001) pursuant to 15 CFR 

325.15. This publication serves as 

public notice that the Certificate was 

relinquished and ceased to be effective 

on December 5, 2023. 

Dated: January 3, 2024. 

Joseph Flynn, 

Director, Office of Trade and Economic 

Analysis, International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

[FR Doc. 2024–00140 Filed 1–5–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–520–807] 

Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel 

Pipe From the United Arab Emirates: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2021– 

2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

determines that producers/exporters of 

circular welded carbon-quality steel 

pipe (CWP) from the United Arab 

Emirates (UAE) subject to this 

administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value (NV) during the period of review 

(POR), December 1, 2021, through 

November 30, 2022. We invite 

interested parties to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable January 8, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rebecca Janz or Sofia Pedrelli, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office II, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–2972 or (202) 482–4301, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 19, 2016, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

antidumping duty order on CWP from 

the UAE.1 On December 1, 2022, 

Commerce published in the Federal 

Register a notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

Order.2 On February 2, 2023, based on 

timely requests for review, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an 

administrative review of the Order with 

respect to seven companies.3 On March 

14, 2023, Commerce selected Conares 

Metal Supply Limited (Conares) and 

Universal Tube and Plastic Industries, 

Ltd./THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC/ 

KHK Scaffolding and Formwork LLC 

(collectively, Universal) for individual 

examination as mandatory respondents 

in this administrative review.4 On April 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
900 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 5 / Monday, January 8, 2024 / Notices 

at 2. Commerce previously determined that 

Universal is a single entity consisting of the 

following three producers/exporters of subject 

merchandise: Universal Tube and Plastic Industries, 

Ltd.; KHK Scaffolding and Formwork LLC; and 

Universal Tube and Pipe Industries LLC. See 

Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the 

United Arab Emirates: Final Determination of Sales 

at Less Than Fair Value, 81 FR 75030 (October 28, 

2016), and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. Additionally, we previously 

determined that THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC 

is the successor-in-interest to Universal Tube and 

Pipe Industries LLC. See Circular Welded CarbonQuality Steel Pipe from the United Arab Emirates: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2016–2017, 84 FR 44845 (August 27, 2019). 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated August 3, 2023. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022: Circular 

Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the United 

Arab Emirates,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum). 

7For more information regarding the calculation 

of this margin, see Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin for NonSelected Companies for the Preliminary Results,’’ 

dated concurrently with this notice. As the 

weighting factor, we relied on the publicly ranged 

sales data reported in the quantity and value charts 

submitted by Conares and Universal. 

8See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

9See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

10See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative 

Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 

88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (APO and 

Final Service Rule). 

11See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

12We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an 

argument that Commerce would normally address 

in a comment of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

3, 2023, Commerce extended the 

preliminary results of this review until 

December 29, 2023.5

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the Order 

are CWP from the UAE. A full 

description of the scope of Order is 

contained in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.6

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) 

and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). Export price and 

constructed export price are calculated 

in accordance with section 772 of the 

Act. NV is calculated in accordance 

with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying these 

preliminary results, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is made available to the 

public via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is available at 

https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not address the establishment of a 

rate to be applied to companies not 

selected for examination when 

Commerce limits its examination in an 

administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in a 

market economy investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the rate for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely on the 

basis of facts available. In this 

administrative review, we preliminarily 

calculated weighted-average dumping 

margins for the mandatory respondents, 

Conares and Universal, that are not zero, 

de minimis, or based entirely on total 

facts available. Accordingly, Commerce 

is preliminarily assigning to the 

companies not individually examined, 

listed in the chart below, a margin of 

1.06 percent which is the weightedaverage of Conares’ and Universal’s 

calculated weighted-average dumping 

margins.7

Preliminary Results of Review 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that the following estimated weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period December 1, 2021, through 

November 30, 2022: 

Exporter/producer 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Conares Metal Supply Limited .................................................................................................................................................... 0.96 

Universal Tube and Plastic Industries, Ltd; THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC; KHK Scaffolding and Framework LLC ........ 1.09 

Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies 

Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes Ind., L.L.C ........................................................................................................................................ 1.06 

K.D. Industries Inc ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1.06 

TSI Metal Industries L.L.C ........................................................................................................................................................... 1.06 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed to parties within five days 

after public announcement of the 

preliminary results.8 Interested parties 

may submit case briefs or other written 

comments to Commerce no later than 30 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice.9 Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues 

raised in the case briefs, may be filed 

not later than five days after the date for 

filing case briefs.10 Interested parties 

who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs 

in this proceeding must submit: (1) a 

table of contents listing each issue; and 

(2) a table of authorities.11

As provided under 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 

proceedings we have encouraged 

interested parties to provide an 

executive summary of their brief that 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes. In this 

administrative review, we instead 

request that interested parties provide at 

the beginning of their briefs a public, 

executive summary for each issue raised 

in their briefs.12 Further, we request that 

interested parties limit their executive 

summary of each issue to no more than 

450 words, not including citations. We 

intend to use the executive summaries 

as the basis of the comment summaries 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 5 / Monday, January 8, 2024 / Notices 901 

13See APO and Final Service Rule. 

14See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 

(February 14, 2012). 

15 Id., 77 FR at 8102–03; see also 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2). 

16See Order; see also Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

17See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

18See Order. 

19See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; and 19 CFR 

351.213(h). 

included in the issues and decision 

memorandum that will accompany the 

final determination in this investigation. 

We request that interested parties 

include footnotes for relevant citations 

in the executive summary of each issue. 

Note that Commerce has amended 

certain of its requirements pertaining to 

the service of documents in 19 CFR 

351.303(f).13

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS. Hearing requests should 

contain: (1) the party’s name, address, 

and telephone number; (2) the number 

of participants; and (3) a list of issues to 

be discussed. Oral presentations at the 

hearing will be limited to issues raised 

in the briefs. An electronically filed 

hearing request must be received 

successfully in its entirety by 

Commerce’s electronic records system, 

ACCESS, by 5 p.m. eastern time within 

30 days after the date of publication of 

this notice. If a request for a hearing is 

made, Commerce intends to hold the 

hearing at a time and date to be 

determined. Parties should confirm by 

telephone the date, time, and location of 

the hearing two days before the 

scheduled date. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of the final results 

of this administrative review, Commerce 

shall determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise covered 

by this review. 

If a respondent’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is not zero or de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in 

the final results of this review, we 

intend to calculate an importer-specific 

assessment rate based on the ratio of the 

total amount of dumping calculated for 

each importer’s examined sales to the 

total entered value of those same sales 

in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).14 If the respondent has 

not reported entered values, we will 

calculate a per-unit assessment rate for 

each importer by dividing the total 

amount of dumping calculated for the 

examined sales made to that importer by 

the total quantity associated with those 

sales. To determine whether an 

importer-specific, per-unit assessment 

rate is de minimis, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we also will 

calculate an importer-specific ad 

valorem ratio based on estimated 

entered values. If either of the 

respondents’ weighted average dumping 

margin or an importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis in 

the final results of review, we intend to 

instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties.15

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by each 

individually examined respondent for 

which the producer did not know that 

the merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate (5.95 percent) if there is no 

rate for the intermediate company(ies) 

involved in the transaction.16

For the companies identified above 

that were not selected for individual 

examination, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate entries at the rate established 

after the completion of the final results 

of this review. 

The final results of this administrative 

review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by this 

review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.17

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for the companies 

listed above will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

review, except if the rate is less than 

0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis 

within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

merchandise exported by companies not 

covered in this review but covered in a 

prior segment of this proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published in the 

completed segment for the most recent 

period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review, a prior review, 

or the original less-than-fair-value 

(LTFV) investigation, but the producer 

is, then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established in the completed 

segment for the most recent period for 

the producer of the merchandise; and 

(4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 5.95 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the LTFV investigation.18

These cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Final Results of Review 

Unless the deadline is otherwise 

extended, Commerce intends to issue 

the final results of this administrative 

review, including the results of its 

analysis of issues raised by interested 

parties in the written comments, within 

120 days after the date of publication of 

these preliminary results in the Federal 

Register.19

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: December 29, 2023. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
902 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 5 / Monday, January 8, 2024 / Notices 

1See Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from 

Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 88 FR 20481 

(April 6, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order; 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from United 

Kingdom, Taiwan, and South Korea, 64 FR 40555 

(July 27, 1999) (Order). 

3The domestic interested parties are Outokumpu 

Stainless USA, LLC and North American Stainless 

(hereinafter, domestic interested parties). 

4See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Case 

Brief Submitted on Behalf of Domestic Interested 

Parties,’’ dated May 8, 2023; See CME’s Letter, 

‘‘CME Reply Brief in Support of Commerce’s 

Preliminary Results,’’ dated May 15, 2023. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Fourth Extension of 

Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated December 12, 2023; 

see also Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated July 27, 2023; and Memorandum, 

‘‘Second Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

October 26, 2023; and Memorandum, ‘‘Third 

Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

November 29, 2023. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2020– 

2021 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in 

Coils from Taiwan,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ 

dated October 7, 2022. 

8See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 20482. 

9See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian 

Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 

(May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal 

from the Russian Federation: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 

56989 (September 17, 2010). 

10See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 2. 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

V. Currency Conversion 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–00083 Filed 1–5–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–831] 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils 

From Taiwan: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Final Determination of No 

Shipments; 2021–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

the producers/exporters subject to this 

administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR), 

July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022. 

Additionally, Commerce determines 

that four companies for which we 

initiated a review had no shipments 

during the POR. 

DATES: Applicable January 8, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rebecca Janz, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2972. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 6, 2023, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

Preliminary Results of the 2021–2022 

administrative review 1 of the 

antidumping duty order on Stainless 

Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from 

Taiwan.2 In May 2023, domestic 

interested parties 3 and CME 

Acquisitions (CME), an importer of the 

subject merchandise, submitted case 

and rebuttal briefs.4 On December 12, 

2023, Commerce extended the time 

period for issuing the final results of 

this review until December 29, 2023.5

For a complete description of the events 

that occurred since the Preliminary 

Results, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.6 Commerce conducted 

this administrative review in 

accordance with section 751 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

This review covers 61 producers and/ 

or exporters of the subject merchandise. 

Commerce selected two companies, 

Lien Kuo Metal Industries Co., Ltd. 

(Lien Kuo) and S More Steel Materials 

Co., Ltd. (S More) for individual 

examination.7 Four companies, Yieh 

Mau Corporation (Yieh Mau), Yuen 

Chang Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. (Yuen 

Chang), and Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., 

Ltd. (Yieh Phui), and Yieh United Steel 

Corporation (YUSCO) reported having 

no shipments during the POR, see 

‘‘Determination of No Shipments’’ 

section below. The remaining producers 

and/or exporters not selected for 

individual examination are listed in the 

‘‘Final Results of the Review’’ section of 

this notice. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the Order 

is certain stainless steel sheet and strip 

in coils from Taiwan. A complete 

description of the scope of the Order is 

contained in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this 

administrative review are addressed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

and are listed in the appendix to this 

notice. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

preliminarily determined that Yieh Mau 

Corporation (Yieh Mau), Yieh Phui 

Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh Phui), Yuen 

Chang Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. (Yuen 

Chang), and Yieh United Steel 

Corporation (YUSCO) made no 

shipments of subject merchandise into 

the United States during the POR.8 We 

received no comments from interested 

parties regarding our preliminary 

determination and do not have any 

information on the record to contradict 

this determination. Therefore, we 

continue to find that Yieh Mau, Yieh 

Phui, Yuen Chang, and YUSCO made no 

shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR. Accordingly, consistent 

with Commerce’s practice, we intend to 

instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to liquidate any 

existing entries of subject merchandise 

produced by Yieh Mau, Yieh Phui, 

Yuen Chang, or YUSCO, but exported 

by other parties, at the rate for the 

intermediate reseller, if available, or at 

the all-others rate.9

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding the Preliminary 

Results, we revised the weighted 

average margin assigned to the 

respondents not selected for individual 

examination.10 For detailed 

information, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Rate for Non-Selected Respondents 

For the rate assigned to companies not 

selected for individual examination in 

an administrative review, generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1