alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1The Honorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3479

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* Eastern District of Arkansas

Leon Bell, Jr., *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: February 19, 1999

 Filed: March 26, 1999

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Leon Bell, Jr., appeals from the final judgment entered in the United States

District Court1 for the Eastern District of Arkansas after he pleaded guilty to affecting

commerce by robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951; and to using and carrying a

firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 924(c)(1). The district court sentenced appellant to two consecutive terms of 60

months imprisonment, plus 3 years of supervised release. For reversal appellant
-2-

argues the district court erred in not granting him an acceptance-of-responsibility

reduction under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3E1.1 (1998).

The district court&s decision whether to grant such a reduction “is afforded

great deference and will not be disturbed unless it is clearly erroneous.” United

States v. Evans, 51 F.3d 764, 766 (8th Cir. 1995); see U.S. Sentencing Guidelines

Manual § 3E1.1, comment. (n.5) (1998). After carefully reviewing the record, we

conclude the court did not clearly err in finding Bell had not met his burden of

demonstrating that he had accepted responsibility, given Bell’s vague admission to

the probation officer about his offense conduct and his failure to add anything of

substance when addressing the court at sentencing. See United States v. Mohamed,

161 F.3d 1132, 1136 (8th Cir. 1998) (defendant not entitled to reduction merely

because she pleads guilty), petition for cert. filed, No. 98-8243 (U.S. Feb. 16, 1999);

United States v. Hawkins, 78 F.3d 348, 352 (1996) (voluntarily admitting

involvement in offense does not automatically entitle defendant to reduction), cert.

denied, 117 S. Ct. 126 (1996); United States v. Byrd, 76 F.3d 194, 196-97 (8th Cir.

1996) (discussing burden); cf. United States v. Chevre, 146 F.3d 622, 625 (8th Cir.

1998) (defendant may receive reduction if he demonstrates recognition and

affirmative responsibility for offense and sincere remorse).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5044 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5044

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2018

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the treatment of 
 certain surviving spouses under the contracting goals and preferences 
                 of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Service-Disabled Veterans Small 
Business Continuation Act''.

SEC. 2. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT REGARDING TREATMENT OF CERTAIN SURVIVING 
              SPOUSES UNDER CONTRACTING GOALS AND PREFERENCES OF 
              DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Effective on the date specified in subsection (e) of section 1832 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public 
Law 114-328; 130 Stat. 2660), section 8127(k)(3) of title 38, United 
States Code, as amended by such section 1832, is further amended by 
inserting after the period at the end the following new sentence: ``A 
surviving spouse of such a veteran who is not covered by subparagraph 
(C)(i) of such section by reason of the disability rating of the 
veteran being less than 100 percent shall be treated as being so 
covered during the period beginning on the date of the death of the 
veteran and ending on the date that is 3 years after such death, the 
date on which the surviving spouse remarries, or the date on which the 
surviving spouse relinquishes an

              

 ownership interest in the small business concern, whichever occurs 
first.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6233]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. HUNTER:
        H.R. 6465.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, section 8, clause 4--``to establish laws of 
     naturalization. . .''
```
NO. 07-03-0530-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	JANUARY 12, 2004

	______________________________

	IN THE INTEREST OF K.L., J.H., C.J.L., S.F.L., AND I.J.L., CHILDREN

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 242ND DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;

	NO. B29927-9809; HONORABLE ED SELF, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	ABATEMENT AND REMAND

	Following termination of his parental rights, appellant Chris Lopez filed a pro se “Notice of Desire to Appeal” the trial court’s judgment.  By letter dated December 25, 2003, appellant notified this Court of his request for appointment of an attorney ad litem and to proceed in forma pauperis.  We abate the appeal and remand the cause.

	In Texas there is a statutory right to counsel for indigent persons in parental termination cases.  Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 107.013(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2004); see also In re M.S., 115 S.W.3d 534, 544 (Tex. 2003).  Therefore, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings.  Upon remand the trial court is directed to determine if appellant is indigent and whether an attorney ad litem shall be appointed to represent appellant on appeal.

	Should the trial court determine that appellant is indigent and entitled to an attorney ad litem, the trial court is directed to appoint counsel and provide counsel’s name, address, telephone number, and state bar number in the order appointing counsel.  The order is to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record to be filed with this Court on or before Friday, January 30, 2004.   

	The trial court is directed to hold any hearings it deems necessary to comply with this order.  If the trial court determines that appellant is not indigent or is not entitled to appointed counsel, then such determination shall be made only following an evidentiary hearing.  A reporter’s record of the evidentiary hearing is to be filed with the appellate clerk on or before January 30, 2004.  

	It is so ordered.

							Per Curiam
Exhibit
      32.3








Certification
      of Senior Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







Date:
      March 15, 2007








/s/
      Larry Hannappel


Larry
      Hannappel


Senior
      Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4698 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4698

   To protect the safety of judges by extending the authority of the 
Judicial Conference to redact sensitive information contained in their 
         financial disclosure reports, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2017

 Mr. Jeffries introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To protect the safety of judges by extending the authority of the 
Judicial Conference to redact sensitive information contained in their 
         financial disclosure reports, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Judicial Redaction Authority Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF REDACTION AUTHORITY CONCERNING SENSITIVE SECURITY 
              INFORMATION.

    Section 105(b)(3) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. 
App.) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (E), by striking ``2017'' both places 
        it appears and inserting ``2018''.
                                 <all>
```
In The Matter Of: 

## SERVED: APRIL 9, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

DocketNo. FAA-2013-0291 AIRBORNE MAINTENANCE AND ENGINEERING SERVICES ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2011S0290032 Respondent
ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO COMPLETE FACT WITNESS DEPOSITIONS
OnNovember 7, 2013, an Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures was filed. Among otherthings, this Order set a deadline ofApril 18, 2014, for the parties to finish taking depositions offact witnesses. On March 11, 2014, the Respondent filed a Motionto Compel Production. On March 18, 2014, the FAA filed a Motion to Compel. On March 21, 2014, the FAA filed a Response in Oppositionto Motionto Compel. On March 26, 2014, the Respondent filed Respondent's Opposition to Complainant's Motion to Compel Production and Reply to Complainant's Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Compel. OnApril3, 2014, the FAA filed a second Motion to Compel. On April 7, 2014, the Respondent filed Respondent's Answer to Cpmplainant's Motion to Compel. Laterthat same day, April 7, 2014, the Respondent filed a Motion to Enlarge Time to Complete Fact Witness Depositions ("Motion"). The Respondent's Motion noted thatthe FAA did not object to the requested extension. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §§13.205(a)(6), (8) and 13.213(b), and afterreviewing all relevant caselaw, regulations, statutory authority, and being fully advised;

### IT IS 

### HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Respondent's Motionto Enlarge Time to Complete Fact Witness Depositions is granted. The deadline for the parties to complete fact witness depositions is extended from April18, 2014 to May

### 31,2014. 2. All other litigation dates contained in the November 7, 2014 Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures are re-confirmed. 4. Separate Orders will issue shortly onthe Respondent's March 11,2014Motionto Compel Production, the FAA's March 18,2014 Motionto Compel, andthe FAA'sApril 3, 2014 Motion to Compel.

Attachment: Service List

Page 2 of2

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL

Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 ORIGINAL & ONE COPY



### Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001



### Mr. Christopher R. 

### Stevenson Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration ONE COPY



### Office ofthe Regional Counsel, Southern Region P. 

### 0. Box20636 Atlanta, GA 30320 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223
. Mr. Robert P. Silverberg Respondent's Counsel Silverberg, Goldman & 

### Bikoff, LLP GeorgetownPlace, Suite 120 1101 30th St., N.W. Washington, DC 20007 TEL: 202-944-3300 FAX: 202-944-3306 Judge J.E. Sullivan U.S. AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0291 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expeditedcourier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 IndependenceAvenue, S.W., Wilbur WrightBuilding-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
once_ex42.htm


EXHIBIT 4.2


 





 




  





1











  






 






 




  





2











  








 






 




  





3











  







 





 




  





4











  










 






 




  





5











  







 





 




  





6











  









 





 


 


7
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4836 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4836

 To provide an exemption to noncontiguous States for certain essential 
                       air service requirements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2018

   Ms. Gabbard (for herself, Mr. Young of Alaska, and Ms. Hanabusa) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide an exemption to noncontiguous States for certain essential 
                       air service requirements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) as noncontiguous States, Alaska and Hawaii are burdened 
        with unique transportation challenges without viable 
        alternatives;
            (2) communities in Alaska and Hawaii are reliant on air 
        transportation, making it an essential lifeline for conducting 
        business, receiving healthcare, and obtaining an education;
            (3) the people of Alaska and Hawaii historically have been 
        exempt from essential air service eligibility requirements 
        under subchapter II of chapter 417 of title 49, United States 
        Code, due to the necessity of air transportation; and
            (4) proposed changes to the essential air service program 
        must consider this historical exemption for Alaska and Hawaii 
        and recognize their reliance on air transportation.

SEC. 2. EAS EXEMPTION FOR NONCONTIGUOUS STATES.

    The matter under the heading ``Department of Transportation--Office 
of the Secretary--Payments to Air Carriers'' in title I of the 
Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development, and Related Agencies 
Appropriations Act, 2017 (division K of Public Law 115-31) is amended 
by inserting ``, excluding a community located in a noncontiguous 
State,'' after ``small hub airport''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of: 

GEORGE B. DITTER 

 

 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 2242 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

Board File No. C2-15-908 

(Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery 

County, Criminal Division, No. CP-46-CR0008215-2015) 

Attorney Registration No. 23199

(Montgomery County) 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

 AND NOW, this 12th day of February, 2016, the Joint Petition to Temporarily 

Suspend an Attorney is granted, George B. Ditter is placed on temporary suspension,

see Pa.R.D.E. 214(d)(5), and he shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217. 

 Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this 

matter.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 21, 2008
 QLOGIC CORPORATION
  Delaware
    
    0-23298
    
    33-0537669(State of incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)
 26650 Aliso Viejo Parkway, Aliso Viejo, California
    
    92656(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (949) 389-6000
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial ConditionItem 9.01 Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXEX-99.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition
   Discussion of Non-GAAP Financial Measures




---



##### Table of Contents



Stock-based compensation.
 Amortization of purchased intangible assets
 Acquisition-related stock-based compensation
 Special charges
 Impairment of marketable securities.




---



##### Table of Contents



Income taxes.




---



##### Table of Contents



Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
  99.1
    
    Press Release*, dated October 21, 2008, reporting the financial results of
QLogic Corporation for its fiscal second quarter ended September 28, 2008.
 
 *
    
    The press release is being furnished pursuant to
Item 9.01, and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  QLOGIC CORPORATIONOctober 21, 2008
    /s/ Simon BiddiscombeSimon BiddiscombeSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description of Document99.1
    
    Press Release, dated October 21, 2008, reporting the financial
results of QLogic Corporation for its fiscal second quarter ended
September 28, 2008.
ex10_7.htm










TWENTY-THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT












This Twenty-Third Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of November 18, 2011, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Employer") and Thomas Martin ("Executive").












Recitals








	
A)  

	
On March 31, 1998 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive.













	
B)  

	
Said Employment Agreement has been amended on twenty-two prior occasions;













	
C)  

	
Employer and Executive now desire to amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow:












Agreement







1.           Section 2.1 of the Agreement which provides:







2.1           Salary.  For Executive's services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $265,200 during each year of the Employment Term.  Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer's normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine.


 

 


is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2012, to provide as follows:







2.1           Salary.  For Executive's services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $350,000 during each year of the Employment Term.  Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer's normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine.













	
2.

	
All other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain unaltered and fully effective.












 







Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.














EXECUTIVE                                                                                                EMPLOYER


PRICESMART, INC.







Thomas Martin                                                                           By:           




______________________                                                            Name:        Jose Luis Laparte 







Its:           CEO and President
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Lawson Software, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Robert G. Barbieri, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ ROBERT G. BARBIERI                                                                     |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert  G. Barbieri*Executive Vice President  and Chief Financial and Performance Officer* |
|   |                                                                                       |
|   | October 8,  2004                                                                      |

 

----