alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, C. Baker Cunningham, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Belden Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annualreport is being prepared;
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) thatoccurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s boardof directors:
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
April 26, 2004                                                 /s/ C. BAKER CUNNINGHAM   C. Baker Cunningham   Chairman of the Board, President andChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Trimeris, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dani P. Bolognesi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DANI P. BOLOGNESI  
|Dani P. Bolognesi      
|                       
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 16, 2007         



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 10.1

AMENDMENT TO

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

In accordance with
Section 20(b) of the Atheros Communications, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the Plan), the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective on October 22, 2008:

1. Section 11(a) of the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan is hereby amended and restated to read in full as follows:

(a) Adjustments. In the event of a subdivision of the outstanding Stock, a declaration of a dividend payable in Shares, a declaration of a dividend payable in a
form other than Shares in an amount that has a material effect on the price of Shares, a combination or consolidation of the outstanding Stock (by reclassification or otherwise) into a lesser number of Shares, a recapitalization, a spin-off or a
similar occurrence, the Committee shall equitably and proportionally adjust as necessary:



|(i) | The number of Options, SARs, Restricted Shares and Stock Units available for future Awards under Section 5;
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The limitations set forth in Sections 5(a) and (b);
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------



|(iii) | The number of NSOs to be granted to Outside Directors under Section 4(b);
|----- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The number of Shares covered by each outstanding Option and SAR;
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------



|(v) | The Exercise Price under each outstanding Option and SAR; or
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------



|(vi) | The number of Stock Units included in any prior Award which has not yet been settled.
|---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Except as provided in this Section 11, a Participant shall have no rights by reason of any issue by the Company of stock of any class or securities convertible into stock of any class, any subdivision or
consolidation of shares of stock of any class, the payment of any stock dividend or any other increase or decrease in the number of shares of stock of any class.

To record the amendment of the Plan, Atheros Communications, Inc. has executed this document this 22nd day of October, 2008.



ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.By:

/s/ Bruce P. JohnsonTitle:

Assistant Secretary
exv4w15



 




EXHIBIT 4.15




BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FINANCE CORPORATION




OFFER TO EXCHANGE




$1,500,000,000 principal amount of its 4.125% Senior
Notes Due 2010




unconditionally guaranteed by Berkshire Hathaway Inc., which
have been registered




under the Securities Act of 1933, for any and all
4.125% Senior Notes Due 2010,




unconditionally guaranteed by Berkshire Hathaway Inc.




Instructions from Beneficial Owner



     
The undersigned acknowledge(s) receipt of your letter and the
enclosed Prospectus and the related Letter of Transmittal in
connection with the offer by the Company to exchange the
Exchange Notes for Outstanding Notes.



     
This will instruct you to tender the principal amount of
Outstanding Notes indicated below held by you for the account of
the undersigned, upon the terms and subject to the conditions
set forth in the Prospectus and the related Letter of
Transmittal.



     
The undersigned represents that (i) the Exchange Notes
acquired pursuant to the Exchange Offer are being obtained in
the ordinary course of the undersigned’s business,
(ii) the undersigned is not engaging, does not intend to
engage, and has no arrangement or understanding with any person
to participate in the distribution of such Exchange Notes,
(iii) the undersigned is not an “affiliate,” as
defined under Rule 405 of the Securities Act, of the
Company and (iv) the undersigned is not acting on behalf of
any person or entity that could not truthfully make these
statements. If the undersigned is a broker-dealer, it
acknowledges that it will deliver a copy of the Prospectus in
connection with any resale of the Exchange Notes.






		
	 	
    Sign Here
	 
	 	
     

	 	
    Signatures(s)











 





Securities which are to be tendered:




Tender all of the Outstanding Notes




Aggregate Principal Amount*




o     Outstanding
Notes 






 





Name(s) (Please Print)




 





Address




 





Zip Code




 





Area Code and Telephone No.




Dated:  
 ,
2005







 







		
	* 	
    Unless otherwise indicated, it will be assumed that all of the
    Outstanding Notes listed are to be tendered.



2
# Garrard - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Bluegrass Area Development District Executive Director David Duttlinger Email &#x64;&#x64;&#x75;&#x74;&#x74;&#x6c;&#x69;&#x6e;&#x67;&#x65;&#x72;&#x40;&#x62;&#x67;&#x61;&#x64;&#x64;&#x2e;&#x6f;&#x72;&#x67;The post Bluegrass Area Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7940

KENNETH B. HAMILTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES B. HUNT, JR.; FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN, JR.;

D. G. LUTHER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-95-958-5-BO)

Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 7, 1996

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth B. Hamilton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Hamilton v. Hunt, No. CA-95-958-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 17,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Find more data on this and other topics at arc.gov/chartbook

of Appalachian households have 

access to a computer device. 

The U.S. average is 88.8%. 

84.2%

of Appalachian households 

have access to a 

smartphone, but 

only 51.1% have 

subscriptions to a

cellular data plan.

69.0% 

of Appalachian 

households have 

a broadband 

subscription. The 

U.S. rate is 80.4%. 

75.1% Broadband 

subscriptions 

are highest in 

Northern 

and Southern 

Appalachia 

and lowest in 

Central Appalachia.

67.0%

76.6%

73.5%

76.6%

74.0%

COMPUTER ACCESS SMARTPHONE ACCESS

BROADBAND SUBSCRIPTIONS BROADBAND SUBSCRIPTIONS BY SUBREGION

Use The Appalachian Region: A Data Overview from the 2014–2018 American Community Survey—also known as the 

Chartbook—to discover more about income and poverty in Appalachia. Authored by the Population Reference Bureau with the 

Appalachian Regional Commission, the Chartbook features data on income, employment, education, and other indicators at 

the regional, subregional, state, and county levels, and examines data change over recent years to show trends. The Chartbook 

draws on data collected before the COVID-19 crisis to provide benchmarking for when new information becomes available. 

IN APPALACHIA

COMPUTER & 

BROADBAND ACCESS

DATA SNAPSHOT
EXHIBIT 31


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert S. Braswell IV, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Direct
Wireless Communications Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
         that material information relating to the registrant,
         including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
         by others within those entities, particularly during the
         period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
         the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation
         Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
         the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
         based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
         internal controls which could adversely affect the
         registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
         financial data and have identified for the registrant's
         auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in
         the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: November 14, 2003

/s/ Robert S. Braswell IV

Robert S. Braswell IV
Chief Administrative Officer
# C_2008064EN.01005302.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/53

---

Action brought on 8 January 2008 — Buczek Automotive v Commission

(Case T-1/08)

(2008/C 64/85)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Buczek Automotive sp. z o.o. (Sosnowiec, Poland) (represented by: T. Gackowski, legal adviser)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare invalid Articles 1, 3(1) and 3(3) of the Commission decision of 23 October 2007 in Case No C 23/2006 (ex NN 35/2006) concerning State aid granted by Poland to the steel producer Grupa Technologie Buczek; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare invalid Articles 1, 3(1) and 3(3) of the Commission decision of 23 October 2007 in Case No C 23/2006 (ex NN 35/2006) concerning State aid granted by Poland to the steel producer Grupa Technologie Buczek;

| — | in the alternative, declare invalid Articles 1, 3(1) and 3(3) of the Commission decision of 23 October 2007 in Case No C 23/2006 (ex NN 35/2006) concerning State aid granted by Poland to the steel producer Grupa Technologie Buczek in so far as the Commission orders recovery of PLN 7 183 528 from the company Buczek Automotive sp. z o.o.; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, declare invalid Articles 1, 3(1) and 3(3) of the Commission decision of 23 October 2007 in Case No C 23/2006 (ex NN 35/2006) concerning State aid granted by Poland to the steel producer Grupa Technologie Buczek in so far as the Commission orders recovery of PLN 7 183 528 from the company Buczek Automotive sp. z o.o.;

| — | declare invalid Articles 4 and 5 of the Commission decision of 23 October 2007 in Case No C 23/2006 (ex NN 35/2006) concerning State aid granted by Poland to the steel producer Grupa Technologie Buczek in so far as those provisions concern the effecting of recovery from Buczek Automotive sp. z o.o.; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare invalid Articles 4 and 5 of the Commission decision of 23 October 2007 in Case No C 23/2006 (ex NN 35/2006) concerning State aid granted by Poland to the steel producer Grupa Technologie Buczek in so far as those provisions concern the effecting of recovery from Buczek Automotive sp. z o.o.;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the form of order which it seeks, the applicant puts forward pleas in law which overlap with those raised by the applicant in Case T-440/07 Huta Buczek v Commission
   (1).

Huta Buczek

Commission

1

---

(1)  OJ 2008 C 22, p. 50.

1

---
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 15

- 0272 USE 2: Industrial Composites and Tooling Application (20%) unknown site(s) Number of Sites/ Location: 8 Days/yr: 30 Basis: Subm: 20% in resin raw material, 30 exposure days/yr (assume same as operating days). 40+ end use sites sites (per 5/ 1/2015 CDX info; assume 20% for this use, or 8 sites). Process Description: Unload pails/ drums (liquid, 20% PMN)

- > resin impregnation system and closed dye with reinforcement fibers

- > Prepegnation operation

- > Molded and Cured (PMN destroyed)

- > Finished article (subm, Chem Rpt) ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.
Water or Incineration or Landfill High End: 2. 4E+0 kg/site

- day over 30 days/yr from 8 sites or 7.1E+1 kg/site

- yr from 8 sites or 5.7E+2 kg/yr

- all sites to: Uncertain (Off

- site drum reclaimer most likely; if water, industrial waste water treatment expected prior to release) from: Cleaning Liquid Residuals from Drums Used to Transport the Raw Material basis: EPA/OPPT Drum Residual Model, CEB standard 3% residual. Submission does not estimate releases from container cleaning for the use operation. Water or Incineration or Landfill Conservative: 7.9E

- 1 kg/site

- day over 30 days/yr from 8 sites or 2.4E+1 kg/site

- yr from 8 sites or 1.9E+2 kg/yr

- all sites to: Uncertain (water seems unlikely for this use) from: Equipment Cleaning Losses of Liquids from a Single, Large Vessel basis: EPA/ OPPT Single Vessel Residual Model, CEB standard 1% residual. Submission does not estimate releases from equipment cleaning for the use operation. CEB assesses releases using standard model to uncertain media.
RELEASE TOTAL 7.6E+2 kg/yr

- all sites
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K/A of
Sheffield Steel Corporation (the Company) for the year ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies, except as disclosed in the Report, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: July 29, 2005



By:

/s/    James P. NolanJames P. NolanPresident and Chief Executive Officer




Date: July 29, 2005



By:

/s/    Stephen R. JohnsonStephen R. JohnsonVice President and Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Oddis Dunn v. Park Harbor Improvement Ass ociatio n
, Inc

. and Its

Commercial Members

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00010

- CV

Trial court case number: 2020

- 06897

Trial court: 234th District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw and appellant is in agreement with his counsel’s withdrawal. Accordingly, we grant the motion to withdraw.

Before counsel withdrew, counsel had filed appellant’s brief. Appellant has asked that we permit him to proceed pro se. Appellant has also filed a motion to strike the brief filed by counsel because appellant tendered a pro se appellant’s brief. We grant the motion to strike and strike the appellant’s brief filed on July 2, 2021. Because the Court has granted the motion to withdraw, appellant may proceed pro se. As construed to be a motion to permit appellant to proceed pro se,

the motion to reconsider is also granted

.
The Court has revie wed appellant’s pro se brief and has determined that it does not comply with the Rule 38.1 requirements. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1. Appellant’s pro se brief fails to include the following:

(1) an index of authorities, see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1(c);

(2) a statement of the case supported by record references, see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1(d);

(3) a statement regarding oral argument, see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1(e);

(4) citations to the record in the statement of facts, see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1(g);

(5) a summary of the argument, see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1( h);

(6) argument containing both citations to the record and to authorities, see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1(i); and

(7) a prayer for relief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1(j).

We strike appellant’s brief filed on August 3, 2021, and order appellant to file a brief correcting the deficiencies listed and in compliance with Rule 38.1 on or before September 23,

2021 . Appellee’s brief will be due 30 days after appellant files a corrected brief

.It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

_____

/s/ Richard Hightower

____  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ August 26, 2021

____