alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29753-29754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11578]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 29754]]

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), announcement is made of an Agency for 
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) 
meeting on ``Estimating the Costs of Supporting Primary Care Practice 
Transformation (R03)''.

DATES: July 11-12, 2013 (Open on July 11 from 8:00 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. 
and closed for the remainder of the meeting).

ADDRESSES: Hyatt Regency Hotel Bethesda, One Metro Center, Bethesda, MD 
20814.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of 
members, agenda or minutes of the non-confidential portions of this 
meeting should contact: Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management 
Officer, Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority 
Populations, AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Room 2038, Rockville, Maryland 
20850, Telephone: (301) 427-1554.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as priorities 
dictate.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Special Emphasis Panel is a group of 
experts in fields related to health care research who are invited by 
the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), and agree to be 
available, to conduct on an as needed basis, scientific reviews of 
applications for AHRQ support. Individual members of the Panel do not 
attend regularly-scheduled meetings and do not serve for fixed terms or 
a long period of time. Rather, they are asked to participate in 
particular review meetings which require their type of expertise.
    Substantial segments of the SEP meeting referenced above will be 
closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in 5 
U.S.C. App. 2, section 10(d), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(6). Grant applications for ``AHRQ RESEARCH SERVICE AWARDS 
(NRSA) INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH TRAINING GRANTS (T32) Special Emphasis 
Award'' are to be reviewed and discussed at this meeting. The grant 
applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Dated: May 8, 2013.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
AHRQ Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-11578 Filed 5-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT FO R THE STATE OF MONTANA
No. DA 21-0200 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. TIMOTHY GALE MUNYAN, Defendant and Appellant.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Moti on to Withdraw as Counsel of Rec ord, and with good cause appearing therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defe ndant and Appellant in this matte r, Timothy Gale Munyan, shall file a response to this motion withi n thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The response must be served upon all counsel of record, including the Attorney General, the County Attorney, and the Ap pellate Defender’s Office.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Cl erk of this Court shall give n otice of this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to Defendant an d Appellant Timothy Gale Muyan. at that p erson’s last known address.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 14 2022

03/14/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0200
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00049]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 01/01-0414]


Ironwood Mezzanine Fund II LP; Surrender of License of Small 
Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under section 309 of the Small Business 
Investment Act of 1958, as amended, and 13 CFR 107.1900 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations to function as a small business investment company 
under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 01/01-0414 
issued to Ironwood Mezzanine Fund II LP, said license is hereby 
declared null and void.

Bailey G. DeVries,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, United 
States Small Business Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024-00049 Filed 1-4-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### Swanie FITZGERALD, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12099.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

April 20, 1955.

Percy Hughes, Hobart, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

POWELL, Judge.

The plaintiff in error, Swanie Fitzgerald, was charged in the county court of Kiowa County by information with the crime of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, was found guilty and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50. Such conviction, under Laws 1953, p. 191, § 1, 47 O.S.A. § 93, makes it mandatory for the Commissioner of Public Safety of Oklahoma to revoke the driver’s license of all persons so convicted, for a period of twelve months, and apparently for such reason an appeal has been perfected to this court.

No brief has been filed on behalf of appellant, and no appearance was made at the time the case was set for oral argument. Rule 9 of this court, 22 O.S.A. c. 18, Appendix, provides:

> “When no counsel appears and no briefs are filed, the Court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court, and the exceptions taken thereto, ' and the judgment and sentence, and if no prejudicial error appears will affirm the judgment.”

Under Rule 6, it is in part provided':

> “In misdemeanor cases where no ' brief is filed by plaintiff in error within thirty days after filing his petition in error, and no extension of time to file brief is granted, the Court may sum- ' marily submit the cause without notice to counsel for plaintiff in error, for decision and without placing the case on the docket for oral argument, as provided under Rule 9.”

We have cárefuly examined the tesr timony of the witnesses as disclosed by the record, and the instructions of the court, and do not find error. There was ample evidence to support the charge contained in the information that the defendant while intoxicated drove a 1950 Chevrolet automobile upon certain streets of Hobart. The defendant produced a number of witnesses *209to show that in their opinion he was not intoxicated a short time before the arrest, or from his movements viewed from a distance at the time of his arrest that he did not act as an intoxicated person. The defendant did not testify. A fact question was presented, and it was within the province of the jury to settle the issue. Landon v. State, 82 Okl.Cr. 336, 166 P.2d 781; Coats v. State, 90 Okl.Cr. 217, 212 P.2d 141, 214 P.2d 455.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

JONES, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

A poverty rate is the ratio of the persons below the poverty level 

to the total number of persons for whom poverty status has been 

determined.The percent of the U.S. average is computed by 

dividing the county poverty rate by the national average and 

multiplying by 100. The map uses critical breaks such as the 

national average to organize the data into groups of common 

values. 

Map Created: March 2015

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2009–2013

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

150.0% - 263.9%

100.1% - 149.9% 

75.1% - 100.0% 

49.5% - 75.0%

Percent of the U.S. Average 

(Critical Breaks Classification) 

U.S. average = 15.4%

Appalachian average = 17.0%
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Nicole S. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 10, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ NICOLE S. WILLIAMS 
|                   |  |  |  | Nicole S. Williams     
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



34
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4927 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4927

   To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of 
 district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2018

   Mr. Brat introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of 
 district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY OF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS TO 
              PROVIDE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 85 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1370. Limitation on authority to provide injunctive relief
    ``(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no United States 
district court shall issue any order providing for injunctive relief, 
except in the case of such an order that is applicable only to--
            ``(1) the parties to the case before such district court; 
        or
            ``(2) in the Federal district in which the order is 
        issued.''.
    (b) Table of Sections.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 84 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following:

``1370. Limitation on authority to provide injunctive relief.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Josephine M. POWELL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 74-1252.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 4, 1976.

Gerald J. Moberg, Moses Lake, Wash., for defendant-appellant.

James B. Crum, Asst. U.S. Atty., Spokane, Wash., for plaintiff-appellee.

*

 The Honorable Manuel Real, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

*372OPINION ON REMAND

Before MERRILL and ELY, Circuit Judges, and REAL,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

This case returns on remand by the United States Supreme Court in *United States v. Powell,*423 U.S. 87, 96 S.Ct. 316, 46 L.Ed.2d 228, after reversal of this Court’s opinion which is found at 501 F.2d 1136.

With the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 1715 now being settled the remand required this Court to consider the remaining contentions of this appeal. They raise no substantial question that would require reversal of the conviction.

Only one merits any mention. Appellant claims the introduction of welfare records evidently privileged by state law requires reversal.

Rule 16 Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure defines the admissibility of evidence in federal criminal trials. Privileges are circumscribed by this pertinent language of Rule 26:

> “. . Competency and privileges of witnesses shall be governed, except when an act of Congress or these rules otherwise provide, by the principles of the common law as they may be interpreted by the courts of the United States in the light of reason and experience.”

We need not decide whether under federal common law the information contained in the welfare records should be held to be privileged. *See Carr v. Monroe Manufacturing Company,*431 F.2d 384 (5th Cir. 1970). No such information was introduced against appellant. The records were introduced for the solé purpose of providing an exemplar of appellant’s handwriting. Privilege would not extend to such matter.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                                   TO
                                  RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                                   OF
                                  GREAT SALT LAKE MINERALS CORPORATION


         The undersigned  officers,  Marschall I. Smith and Rose Marie Williams,
Vice President and Assistant  Secretary,  and Secretary,  respectively  of Great
Salt Lake Minerals  Corporation,  a corporation organized and existing under the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"),  do hereby
certify that:

1.   Article  FIRST  of  the  Restated   Certificate  of  Incorporation  of  the
     Corporation is hereby amended in its entirety as follows:

               "FIRST:   The name of the corporation is IMC Kalium Ogden Corp."

2.   This Certificate of Amendment was duly adopted by unanimous  consent of the
     directors and sole voting  stockholder of the Corporation  according to the
     provisions of Sections 141(f),  229 and 242 of the General  Corporation Law
     of the State of Delaware.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned  have hereunto  subscribed their names
this 18th day of June, 1998.

                                                GREAT SALT LAKE MINERALS
                                                CORPORATION

     [seal]
                                                By:   /s/ Marschall I. Smith
                                                          Marschall I. Smith
                                                          Vice President and
                                                          Assistant Secretary

     Attest:


      /s/ Rose Marie Williams
     Rose Marie Williams
     Secretary


<PAGE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-102550) and the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (No. 333-98231, No. 333-102554, No. 333-09727, No. 333-39181, No. 333-45731, No. 333-60993, No. 333-72527, No. 333-87511, No. 333-30164, No. 333-41088, and No. 333-68102) of Captiva Software Corporation (formerlyActionPoint, Inc.) of our report dated February 27, 2004 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

San Diego, California 

March 12, 2004
#### AMERICAN MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. SPRINGFIELD WAGON & TRAILER COMPANY.

No. 11427.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

March 11, 1939.

William S. Hogsett, Ralph E. Murray, and Hale Houts, all of Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

William D. Tatlow, of Springfield, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed at costs of appellant, but without taxation of statutory attorney’s docket fee in favor of appellee, per stipulation of parties.
****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Pictures Corp. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I Avery Pack, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18  U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|        |        |                                       |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| By:    |   | /s/ Avery Pack                             |   |
|        |        |                                            |   |
|        |        | Avery Pack         Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |   |                                       |   |
| Date:  |   | October 28, 2002                           |   |
|   |   |                                            |   |
Exhibit 12

                Bedford Property Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends
                       and Limited Partner Distributions
                          (in thousands, except ratios)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Year Ended December 31,
                                                      -----------------------

                                             2001      2000      1999      1998      1997
                                             ----      ----      ----      ----      ----
<S>                                         <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Net income (1)                              $34,950   $68,307   $38,659   $29,695   $30,752

Fixed charges - interest and amortization
   of loan fees (1)                          22,538    24,765    18,939    11,164     7,918

Fixed charges - interest capitalized          1,303     1,964     2,148     2,177       627
                                            -------  --------   -------  --------  --------

Net income including fixed charges (1)       58,791    95,036    59,746    43,036    39,297

Preferred dividends and limited partner
     distributions                              142       136       128       117     3,608
                                            -------   -------   -------   -------   -------

Net income including fixed charges,
     preferred dividends and limited
     partner distributions (1)              $58,933   $95,172   $59,874   $43,153   $42,905
                                            =======   =======   =======   =======   =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
     including preferred dividends and
     limited partner distributions (1)         2.46      3.54      2.82      3.21      3.53
                                            =======   =======   =======   =======   =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
     excluding preferred dividends and
     limited partner distributions (1)         2.47      3.56      2.84      3.23      5.02
                                            =======   =======   =======   =======   =======
</TABLE>

(1) Restated, see Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.


                                       F34
<PAGE>   1
                           PAIRGAIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                   EXHIBIT 23.1--INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-72792 and 33-96080 on Form S-8 and No. 333-23067 on Form S-3, as amended, of
PairGain Technologies, Inc. of our report dated January 26, 1999, appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PairGain Technologies, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 1998.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Costa Mesa, California
March 29, 1999
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 09, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 09, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0229. IN THE INTEREST OF: W. R., J. R., H. R. AND A. R., CHILDREN

(MOTHER) .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

09112DF
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1993-A,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,139
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  37,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               38,532
<PP&E>                                         4,268,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,653,433)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,653,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          195,257
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,458,716
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,653,973
<SALES>                                        142,919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               143,058
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  639,019<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (566,934)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (566,934)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (566,934)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>