alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 89453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28506]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Notice of Meetings

AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Department 
of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice of five AHRQ subcommittee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The subcommittees listed below are part of AHRQ's Health 
Services Research Initial Review Group (IRG) Committee. Grant 
applications are to be reviewed and discussed at these meetings. Each 
subcommittee meeting will be closed to the public.

DATES: See below for dates of meetings:

1. Healthcare Effectiveness and Outcomes Research (HEOR)
    Date: February 7-8, 2024
2. Healthcare Safety and Quality Improvement Research (HSQR)
    Date: February 7-8, 2024
3. Health System and Value Research (HSVR)
    Date: February 13-14, 2024
4. Healthcare Research Training (HCRT)
    Date: February15-16, 19, 2024
5. Healthcare Information Technology Research (HITR)
    Date: February 29-March 1, 2024

ADDRESSES:  Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Virtual 
Review), 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland, 20857.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (to obtain a roster of members, agenda 
or minutes of the non-confidential portions of the meetings.)
    Jenny Griffith, Committee Management Officer, Office of Extramural 
Research Education and Priority Populations, Division of Policy, 
Coordination and Analysis, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 
(AHRQ), 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, Telephone (301) 
427-1557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with section 10 (a)(2) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2), AHRQ announces 
meetings of the above-listed scientific peer review groups, which are 
subcommittees of AHRQ's Health Services Research Initial Review Group 
Committee. The subcommittee meetings will be closed to the public in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 section 
10(d), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6). The grant 
applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Agenda items for these meetings are subject to change as priorities 
dictate.

    Dated: December 20, 2023.
Marquita Cullom,
Associate Director.
[FR Doc. 2023-28506 Filed 12-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-P
Fiscal Year 2006 Six and Twelve Month Bonus Plans for Executives



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 Description of 
 TiVo Inc. Fiscal Year 2006 
 Six and Twelve Month Bonus Plans for Executives. 
  
 Purpose: 
  
 The terms of the TiVo Inc. (the “Company”) Fiscal Year 2006 Six and Twelve Month Bonus Plans for Executives (each the “Six
Month Plan” and “Twelve Month Plan”, and together the “Plans”) have been established to reward the Company’s executives for assisting the Company in achieving its operational goals through exemplary performance. Under
the Plans, cash bonuses, if any, will be based on the achievement of specified corporate goals, as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) and/or the Board of Directors (the
“Board”). 
  
 Determination of Fiscal Year 2006 Bonuses:

  
 Target cash bonuses for executives (excluding the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer) under the Plans for fiscal year 2006 range from 30% to 50% of the recipient’s base salary. The participation in the Plans of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Michael Ramsay, will be prorated for the amount of time
he actually serves as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Ramsay’s fiscal year 2006 target bonus amount for the Plans is set at seventy percent (70%) of his fiscal year 2006 base compensation. Actual bonuses will be based on the
achievement of objective Company performance goals and may be higher or lower than targeted amounts according to a pre-determined formula that will be applied by the Compensation Committee. The objective Company performance goals will be based on
meeting certain goals with respect to the Company’s financial performance, subscription growth, product innovation and distribution, and employee recruitment and retention, as well as other Company performance goals that may be determined by
the Compensation Committee. Under the Six Month Plan, the Company’s executives will be eligible to receive up to half of their full fiscal year 2006 bonuses at the mid-point of the Company’s fiscal year based upon the Compensation
Committee’s assessment of the Company’s progress towards achievement of its pre-determined performance goals for fiscal year 2006. The Board and the Compensation Committee reserve the right to modify these goals, amounts and criteria at
any time.
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8, previously filed by NB&T Financial Group, Inc. on March 23, 1995 and April 19, 2006, of our report dated March 16, 2010 on our audit of the consolidatedfinancial statements of NB&T Financial Group, Inc., as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 which report and financial statements are contained in the Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and 2008. 

 

Cincinnati, Ohio

March 16, 2010 

 

80
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5920]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              ADJOURNMENT

  Mr. GOHMERT. Mr. Speaker, I move that the House do now adjourn.
  The motion was agreed to; accordingly (at 7 o'clock and 29 minutes 
p.m.), under its previous order, the House adjourned until tomorrow, 
Thursday, September 13, 2012, at 10 a.m. for morning-hour debate.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H6160-H6161]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     SEQUESTRATION TRANSPARENCY ACT

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from 
Oregon (Ms. Bonamici) for 5 minutes.
  Ms. BONAMICI. Mr. Speaker, during the month of August, I had held 
several town hall meetings throughout my district in Oregon. In these 
meetings, I've done a summary of the work that we're doing here in 
Congress and then opened the floor for questions from and discussions 
with my constituents.
  Without fail, in every town hall meeting at least one person would 
ask about the partisan rancor and the gridlock that's come to 
characterize Washington. They would ask me: Can you tell us something 
that's bipartisan that you've done, something where you've worked 
together, some achievement that everyone's agreed on.

[[Page H6161]]

  Now, in responding to them, I've often discussed a piece of 
legislation that's very important to the debate on budget priorities 
and the so-called ``fiscal cliff''; that's the Sequestration 
Transparency Act. This bill passed the Budget Committee by voice vote 
and was later approved in the House, with only two in opposition. After 
the Senate passed it with unanimous consent, the President signed it 
into law. So this was truly a bipartisan effort, a statement by almost 
every one of us working together that we're concerned about the impact 
that sequestration might have on our constituents, and an effort to get 
more information about the true harm that that sequestration will 
cause.
  Now, following the administration's recent report detailing those 
cuts that would come under sequestration, I am even more concerned than 
before, and my constituents are concerned. And I know constituents all 
across this country are concerned as well. Mr. Speaker, there is 
bipartisan concern about the impact that sequestration might have, and 
yet we haven't been able to come to a bipartisan consensus to avoid it.
  We've identified a problem; now we must identify a solution. This 
should be a balanced solution, working together, and I look forward to 
working with all of my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to arrive 
at that solution. It's a solution for my district in Oregon, for all of 
the great State, and, importantly, for all of this great Nation.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 8.1

SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

The table below sets forth all of our direct and indirect
significant subsidiaries and the percentage of equity of each subsidiary we owned directly or indirectly as of December 31, 2015:



|                                                                      |  |                              |  |                 |        |  |             |                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | --------------- | ------ |  | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Name of Company                                                       |  | Jurisdiction ofIncorporation |  | PercentageOwned |        |  | Description
|Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V.                                          |  | Mexico                       |  |                 | 100.0% |  |             | Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.             
|                                                                      |  |                              | 
|Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V.            |  | Mexico                       |  |                 | 100.0% |  |             | Holding company of manufacturers and distributors of beverages.
|                                                                      |  |                              | 
|Spal Industria Brasileira de Bebidas, S.A.                            |  | Brazil                       |  |                 | 96.1%  |  |             | Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.             
|                                                                      |  |                              | 
|Distribuidora y Manufacturera del Valle de México, S. de R.L. de C.V. |  | Mexico                       |  |                 | 100.0% |  |             | Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.             
|                                                                      |  |                              | 
|Servicios Refresqueros del Golfo, S. de R.L. de C.V.                  |  | Mexico                       |  |                 | 100.0% |  |             | Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.             
|                                                                      |  |                              | 
|Coca-Cola FEMSA de Argentina, S.A.                                    |  | Argentina                    |  |                 | 100.0% |  |             | Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.
# C_2010051EN.01001201.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 December 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-120/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 1999/31/EC - Landfilling of waste - Concept of ‘underground storage’, of ‘landfill gas’ and ‘eluate’ - Obligation to determine the trigger levels from which it can be considered that the location of the landfill has a significant adverse effect on groundwater quality - Failure to transpose within the prescribed time limit with regard to the Walloon Region)

2010/C 51/18

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. van Beek and J.-B. Laignelot, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by T. Materne, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to transpose fully into Walloon law Article 2(f), (j) and (k) of, and point 4C of Annex III to, Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste (OJ 1999 L 182, p. 1) — Concept of ‘underground storage’, of ‘landfill gas’ and ‘eluate’- Obligation to determine the trigger levels from which it can be considered that the location of the landfill has a significant adverse effect on groundwater quality

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | By failing to ensure the transposition with regard to the Walloon Region of Article 2(f), (j) and (k) of, and point 4C of Annex III to, Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

By failing to ensure the transposition with regard to the Walloon Region of Article 2(f), (j) and (k) of, and point 4C of Annex III to, Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| 2. | The Kingdom of Belgium shall bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Kingdom of Belgium shall bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 141 of 20.06.2009

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1416]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

     IN RECOGNITION OF THE CAPE COD CRANBERRY GROWERS' ASSOCIATION

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. WILLIAM R. KEATING

                            of massachusetts

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Mr. KEATING. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to celebrate the 125th annual 
meeting of the Cape Cod Cranberry Growers' Association, a professional 
organization representing over 330 cranberry growers throughout 
Massachusetts.
   Established in 1888 to standardize the 100 pound barrel, the measure 
with which cranberries are sold, the Cape Cod Cranberry Growers' 
Association, CCCGA, is one of the oldest farmer organizations in the 
country. Since its creation, the CCCGA has stayed true to its original 
goal--to support and promote the interests of Massachusetts cranberry 
growers.
   To execute its mission, the CCCGA's professional staff continuously 
sponsors professional development seminars for growers, assists growers 
in regulatory compliance, provides resources for environmental 
sustainability, and supports community and professional outreach 
activities. Through investments of over $500,000 dollars in studies and 
research efforts to improve the efficiency of cranberry farmers as well 
as to promote environmentally compatible farming techniques, the CCCGA 
promotes the sustainable success of the Massachusetts cranberry grower.
   Cranberries are synonymous with Massachusetts and the significance 
of the Commonwealth's cranberry industry is illustrated by the revenues 
generated in 2012, which exceeded $120 million and the roughly 5,000 
workers employed in the industry. In addition to supporting large, 
commercial enterprises, the Cape Cod Cranberry Growers' Association 
provides assistance to small, family owned and operated businesses. 
Approximately seventy percent of CCCGA businesses are family owned and 
operated, and some have been continuously run by the same family for as 
many as five generations.
   The importance of the resources provided to sustain the success of 
such hard-working growers cannot be overstated. Through its continued 
support, the CCCGA is working to ensure that Massachusetts cranberry 
farmers can adapt to environmental changes, that they survive 
urbanization, and that they continue to experience success and growth 
into the future.
   Mr. Speaker, please join me in celebrating the 125th annual meeting 
of the Cape Cod Cranberry Growers' Association. May the CCCGA continue 
to fulfill its mission and be a strong, viable supporter of 
Massachusetts cranberry growers.

                          ____________________
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

133818 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. STEPHEN E. McALPINE and RONALD Stephen J. Markman, KEITH WHEELER, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 133818 COA: 266428 Oakland CC: 2005-064357-NM DAVID EINSTANDIG an d THAV, GROSS, STEINWAY & BENNETT, P.C., Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4685 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4685

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 515 Hope Street in Bristol, Rhode Island, as the ``First Sergeant P. 
                   Andrew McKenna Jr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2017

 Mr. Cicilline (for himself and Mr. Langevin) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 515 Hope Street in Bristol, Rhode Island, as the ``First Sergeant P. 
                   Andrew McKenna Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIRST SERGEANT P. ANDREW MCKENNA JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 515 Hope Street in Bristol, Rhode Island, shall be known and 
designated as the ``First Sergeant P. Andrew McKenna Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``First 
Sergeant P. Andrew McKenna Jr. Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
### TEX A S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-05-00462- CV M ar ia A lva r ado , App e lla nt

v. J ohn M c Ca r th y d/ b/ a St . Loui s C at hol icChu r c h d/ b/ a St. Loui s Kin g of

FranceCatholic Church, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COU NTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRI CT NO. GN403351 , HONO RABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I NI O N Appellant M ar ia Alvar ado has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal. We gr ant the motion and dismi ss the appea l. T ex. R. App. P . 42. 1(a) .

__________________________________________ D avid P ur year , Justice B efor e C hief Justice L aw, Justices B . A. S mith and P ur year D ismiss ed on Appe llant’s M otion F iled: S eptember 26, 2005
Map Created: March 2014

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2012

Per Capita Income Rates in Appalachia, 2012

(County Rates)

Per capita income is a measure of the total personal income of 

an area divided by the resident population of the area. The map 

uses natural breaks in the distribution to organize the data into 

groups of common values. 

0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

$20,335 - $27,373

$27,374 - $31,506

$31,507 - $36,881

$36,882 - $51,798

Per Capita Income

U.S. average = $43,735

Appalachian average = $35,849

(Natural Breaks Classification)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1511]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   HONORING MR. JAMES FLOYD CLEVELAND

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. RODNEY ALEXANDER

                              of louisiana

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 13, 2012

  Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the life of Mr. 
James Floyd Cleveland, who passed away on July 31 at the age of 88.
  Mr. Cleveland was a truly wonderful example of a man who lived the 
American dream. Born on December 17, 1923, he was a cultivator of corn, 
cotton, soybeans, hogs and cattle on his family farm for over 60 years. 
He was widely known to have the best okra and mustard greens in town. 
Moreover, many deemed him the ``Historian'' for his long life and 
incredible ability to bring oral history to life.
  Having accepted Christ at an early age, Mr. Cleveland was baptized in 
1939 and dedicated much of his time to good works, notably as an active 
member of St. Matthew Benevolent Society and Secretary of the Lily 
Lodge number 5911 in Rapides Station, Louisiana.
  Mr. Cleveland enjoyed 57 years of married life with Bernice Jones. 
Mrs. Cleveland preceded him in death on January 6, 2011, but not a day 
went by that he didn't speak lovingly of seeing her again. Their union 
produced a daughter, Sheila Joyce Bryant, who married Arthur R. Bryant. 
His two granddaughters, Rachel Joyce and Bathsheba Felice were the joys 
of his life.
  As a leader in his community, he strived to make life better for 
others. He rose to the occasion after the 1965 United States Voting 
Rights Act and was instrumental in ensuring African-Americans 
registered and cast their votes for the first time. He was appointed to 
the Rapides Parish Election process and served as Key Custodian from 
1991 to 2006, always going above and beyond in his civic duty.
  We all have much to learn from the life and legacy of Mr. Cleveland, 
who lived a quiet and honorable life as one of the farmers who feeds 
America. To say that Mr. Cleveland left his fingerprint on the world is 
an understatement. He was a friend to many and an example for all who 
had the good fortune to know him.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask my colleagues to join me in paying tribute to the 
late Mr. James Floyd Cleveland.

                          ____________________
```