alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
9722 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda 

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS 

BOARD 

29 CFR Parts 101 to 103 

Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory 

and Deregulatory Actions 

AGENCY: National Labor Relations 

Board. 

ACTION: Semiannual Regulatory Agenda. 

SUMMARY: The following agenda of the 

National Labor Relations Board is 

published in accordance with Executive 

Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and 

Review,’’ and the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as 

amended by the Small Business 

Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. 

The complete Unified Agenda is 

available online at www.reginfo.gov. 

Publication in the Federal Register is 

mandated only for regulatory flexibility 

agendas required under the RFA. 

Because the RFA does not require 

regulatory flexibility agendas for the 

regulations proposed and issued by the 

Board, the Board’s agenda appears only 

on the internet at www.reginfo.gov. 

The Board’s agenda refers to 

www.regulations.gov, the Government 

website at which members of the public 

can find, review, and comment on 

Federal rulemakings that are published 

in the Federal Register and open for 

comment. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

further information concerning the 

regulatory actions listed in the agenda, 

contact Farah Z. Qureshi, Deputy 

Executive Secretary, National Labor 

Relations Board, 1015 Half Street SE, 

Washington, DC 20570; telephone 202– 

273–1949, TTY/TDD 1–800–315–6572; 

email Farah.Qureshi@nlrb.gov. 

Farah Z. Qureshi, 

Deputy Executive Secretary. 

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD—COMPLETED ACTIONS

Sequence No. Title Regulation 

Identifier No. 

603 .................... Joint Employer ................................................................................................................................................. 3142–AA21 

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS 

BOARD (NLRB) 

Completed Actions 

603. Joint Employer [3142–AA21] 

Legal Authority: 29 U.S.C. 156 

Abstract: The National Labor 

Relations Board will engage in 

rulemaking on the standard for 

determining whether two employers, as 

defined in section 2(2) of the National 

Labor Relations Act (Act), are a joint 

employer under the Act. 

Completed: 

Reason Date FR Cite 

Final Rule ............ 10/27/23 88 FR 73946 

Final Rule Effective.12/26/23 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 

Required: Yes. 

Agency Contact: Farah 

Qureshi,Phone: 202 273–1949,Email: 

farah.qureshi@nlrb.gov. 

Roxanne Rothschild,Phone: 202 273– 

2917,Email: roxanne.rothschild@

nlrb.gov. 

RIN: 3142–AA21 

[FR Doc. 2024–00467 Filed 2–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7545–01–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS24

I I
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              22,594
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      586,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (24,421)
<INVENTORY>                                        587,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,213,219
<PP&E>                                           1,548,279
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,360,882)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,549,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,975,791
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        11,973,048 
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,127,290 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,549,093 
<SALES>                                          4,450,019 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,450,019 
<CGS>                                            2,054,012 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,054,012 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,331,895 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  94,028 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (22,338)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        27,167 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (49,505)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (49,505)      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.00
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1577]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

         RECOGNIZING ED BERGH ON THE OCCASION OF HIS RETIREMENT

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. ADAM SMITH

                             of washington

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I rise to honor Ed Bergh on his 
retirement from Yelm High School after 38 years of teaching. The 
Washington State Legislature has also named Mr. Bergh the Washington 
Civic Educator of the Year.
  Mr. Bergh studied political science at Western Washington University 
and soon after graduation, he became a Social Studies teacher. Today, 
Mr. Bergh teaches World Problems, History, and American Government.
  In addition to his passion for educating young people, Mr. Bergh 
loves learning more about the subjects he teaches. He looks for ways to 
increase his knowledge and apply that learning to the classroom. Mr. 
Bergh does not simply lecture his students, he engages them in 
discussion and helps them think critically before reaching conclusions.
  In addition to teaching, Mr. Bergh enjoys learning and writing about 
his hometown, Yelm, Washington. He created the Yelm History Project, a 
virtual database for the history of Yelm, the Web site of which he and 
his students regularly update.
  Mr. Speaker, it is with great honor that I recognize the career of Ed 
Bergh. His dedication to teaching is an inspiration and has undoubtedly 
helped countless students who have gone on to accomplish great things.

                          ____________________
```
# FY 2018 - Appalachian Regional Commission

- County Economic Status in Appalachia, FY 2018 This map shows ARC’s economic classification of the 420 counties in the Appalachian Region for FY 2018 (October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018).The post County Economic Status in Appalachia, FY 2018 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2011030EN.01003501.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 December 2010 — Commission v Commune de Valbonne

(Case T-238/08) (1)

1

(Arbitration clause - Research and training contract relating to a mutual education project between the city of Valbonne (France) and the province of Ascoli Piceno (Italy) - Application for reimbursement of advance payments)

2011/C 30/61

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: initially, L. Escobar Guerrero, and subsequently, F. Dintilhac and A. Sauka, agents, and E. Bouttier, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commune de Valbonne (France) (represented by: B. Rapp-Jung, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action based on an arbitration clause in accordance with Article 238 EC seeking an order that the Commune de Valbonne reimburse advance payments made by the European Commission, together with late-payment interest, in connection with Contract Valaspi MM 1027 of 29 December 1997.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 30.8.2008.

1

---
H. R. 4854 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To amend the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 to provide additional 

resources to State and local prosecutors, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice Served Act of 2018’’. 

SEC. 2. PROSECUTION OF DNA COLD CASES. 

(a) DEBBIE SMITH DNA BACKLOG GRANT PROGRAM.—Section 

2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (34 U.S.C. 

40701) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(9) To increase the capacity of State and local prosecution 

offices to address the backlog of violent crime cases in which 

suspects have been identified through DNA evidence.’’; and 

(2) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(5) ALLOCATION OF GRANT AWARDS FOR PROSECUTORS.— 

For each fiscal year, not less than 5 percent, but not more 

than 7 percent, of the grant amounts distributed under paragraph (1) shall, if sufficient applications to justify such amounts 

are received by the Attorney General, be awarded for purposes 

described in subsection (a)(9), provided that none of the funds 

required to be distributed under this paragraph shall decrease 

or otherwise limit the availability of funds required to be 

awarded to States or units of local government under paragraph 

(3).’’. 

(b) PROSECUTION OF COLD CASES.—Of the amounts made available to the Attorney General for a DNA Analysis and capacity 

enhancement program and for other local, State, and Federal 

forensic activities for the purpose described in section 2 of the 

DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (34 U.S.C. 40701) 

under the heading ‘‘STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE’’ under the heading ‘‘OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS’’ under 

the heading ‘‘DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE’’ in fiscal years 2019, 

2020, 2021, and 2022, not less than 5 percent, but not more than 

7 percent, of such amounts shall be provided for grants for prosecutors to increase the capacity of State and local prosecution offices 
H. R. 4854—2 

to address cold cases involving violent crime, where suspects have 

been identified through DNA evidence. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Before the U.S. Department of Transportation 

Federal Aviation Administration 

In the matter of 

M&RHELICOPTER 

DECEIVED 

FEB 2 3 2011 

I EARING DOCKET 

Docket No. CPlOSOOOll 

FAA Case No. 2009SO950434 

Chief Judge Ronnie A. Yoder 

COMPLAINANT'S RESPONSE TO M & R HELICOPTERS' 

MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT - INADEQUATE METHODS • ''£ \ra 

OF COMPLIANCE AND NOTIFICATION and MOTION FOR MOIOE ^: 3 § 

DEFINITE STATEMENT - INADEQUATE DISCLOSURE AND o ':ogH^ 

INTERPRETATION OF REGULATIONS V ^ 5 ^ 

Complainant files this response to Respondent M & R Helicopters' (Respondent-^ 

Motion for More Definite Statement - Inadequate Methods of Compliance and 

Notification and Motion for More Definite Statement - Inadequate Disclosure and 

Interpretation of Regulations. Respondent's arguments are repetitive and were addressed 

in Complainant's Response to Respondent's Motion to Quash. Strike, or Dismiss 

Complaint filed on December 10, 2010. 

WHEREFORE, Complainant respectfully requests that the Chief Administrative 

Law Judge refer to Complainant's prior response and deny Respondent's Motion for 

More Definite Statement - Inadequate Methods of Compliance and Notification and 

Motion for More Definite Statement - Inadequate Disclosure and Interpretation of 

Regulations. 

Respectfiilly submitted, 

Peter J. Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

dMAjb^^T7YB4:M t > 
Laura Ponto 

Attorney 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Phone: (202)267-9863 

Facsimile: (202)267-5106 

Date: February 18, 2011 
Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that on this date I have placed in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid, 

certified return-receipt, a copy of Motion for More Definite Statement - Inadequate 

Methods of Compliance and Notification and Motion for More Definite Statement -

Inadequate Disclosure and Interpretation of Regulations In the Matter ofM & R 

Helicopters, Docket No. CPlOSOOOl 10, FAA Case no. 2009SO950434, addressed to: 

Dr. Michael B. Selig 

President 

M & R Helicopters, LLC 

2045 Westgate Dr., Suite 205 

Bethlehem, PA 18017 

In addition, I hereby certify that on this date I have sent by the U.S. mail, postage 

prepaid, certified return-receipt and facsimile one copy of the foregoing document to: 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Facsimile: 202-366-7536 

In addition, I hereby certify that on this date I have sent by the U.S. mail, postage 

prepaid, certified return-receipt, the original and one copy of the foregoing document to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Dated: February 18, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,204,103
<SECURITIES>                                 6,970,297
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,639,736
<ALLOWANCES>                                   187,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,869,751
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,094,183
<PP&E>                                       6,850,633
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,718,682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,552,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,759,962
<BONDS>                                        363,391
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,318
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,252,239
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,552,223
<SALES>                                     35,103,831
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,103,831
<CGS>                                       20,571,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,571,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                80,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,619
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,008,152
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,453,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,555,152
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,555,152
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 No. 333-42533,
No. 333-86001, and No. 333-100011 (pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan and the 1998 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, and the 2002 Stock Option
Plan), and Forms S-3 No. 333-33710, No. 333-51250 and No. 333-53538 of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated February 24, 2003 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.



Palo
Alto, California
March 27, 2003

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Robert G. Barbieri, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lawson Software, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: January 8, 2004                                                                         |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ ROBERT G. BARBIERIRobert G. Barbieri Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 

42

---

QuickLinks
KentuckyUnbridledSpirit.com An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/D

STEVEN L. BESHEAR 

GOVERNOR

LEONARD K. PETERS 

SECRETARY

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CABINET 

DEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

DIVISION OF WATER 

200 FAIR OAKS LANE 

FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY 40601 

www.kentucky.gov 

 

July 6, 2012 

James Giattina, Director 

Water Protection Division 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 4 

Atlanta Federal Center 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

 RE: Vessel General Permit 

 Small Vessel General Permit 

 Kentucky Section 401 Certification 

Dear Mr. Giattina: 

The Kentucky Division of Water has reviewed the draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination 

System (NPDES) Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General Permit for the purpose of providing State 

certification in accordance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). These general permits 

authorize incidental vessel discharges into the waters of the Commonwealth of Kentucky during normal 

operation. 

Pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA, the Commonwealth of Kentucky certifies it has reasonable 

assurances that applicable water quality standards under Kentucky Administrative Regulations Title 401, 

Chapter 10, established pursuant to Sections 208(e), 301, 302, 303, 306, and 307 of the CWA, will not be 

violated by the above referenced general permits. The Kentucky Division of Water hereby certifies as 

written the NPDES Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General Permit. Please contact me if you have 

any questions by calling (502) 564-3410. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 Sandra Gruzesky, Director 

 Kentucky Division of Water 

BJS: SG
#### Robert E. Bills et al., Plaintiffs, v. Marvic Construction Co., Inc., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

November 2, 1959.

*Michael Marcantonio*for plaintiffs.

*Conforti, Seward, Raphael & Kourides*for Great East Neck Estates, Inc., defendant.

Mario Pittoni, J.

The plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is *denied.*

The moving papers do not contain any answer although the plaintiffs’ affidavit states that the defendant, Great East Neck Estates, Inc. has answered. There is nothing to show that the defendant, Marvic Construction Co., Inc., has answered. It filed no affidavit in opposition although copies of the motion papers herein were served upon it.

The motion must be denied as to defendant Marvic Construction Co., Inc., because a motion for summary judgment can be granted only after an answer has been interposed.

*557In respect to the defendant, Great East Neck Estates, Inc., there is no proof of the escrow agreement except the plaintiffs ’ affidavit. The defendant’s affidavit states categorically that there was an escrow agreement, but sets forth facts explaining the delivery of the $600 to Great East Neck Estates, Inc., which may, if proved, defeat its liability. Thus, because the court does not have the answer before it, and since the affidavits raise issues of fact, summary judgment cannot be granted. *(Curry*v. *MacKensie,*239 N. Y. 267.)

Motion denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of GammaCan International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick Schnegelsberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                  |   |      |
|-----------------------|--------|-----------|
| Date: August 14, 2008 |   | By:  |  /s/                            Patrick Schnegelsberg |
|                  |   |      |  |
|                  |   |      | Patrick SchnegelsbergChief Executive Officer |

 

 

----