alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1998
<CASH>                                          28,794
<SECURITIES>                                    92,712
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,820
<ALLOWANCES>                                       418
<INVENTORY>                                     20,495
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,518
<PP&E>                                          90,220
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,321
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 326,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,417
<BONDS>                                        115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       124,412
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   326,290
<SALES>                                        262,988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               262,988
<CGS>                                          109,656
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               117,076
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,976
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,567
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,652
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,915
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,915
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57
        

</TABLE>
# Wyoming - Appalachian Regional Commission

- The Natural Capital Investment Fund: A Path To Success In 2016, the Natural Capital Investment Fund (NCIFund) partnered with the Hatfield McCoy Trail Authority and Southern West Virginia Community and Technical College (Southern) to drive recreational tourism development in the coalfields of southern West Virginia. Through ARC POWER funding, the partners launched a revolving loan fund dedicated to financing and providing business technical assistance [&#8230;]The post The Natural Capital Investment Fund: A Path To Success appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- SWEEP: Training West Virginia’s Entrepreneurs “About 80% of West Virginia businesses have 20 or less employees,” said Alyssa Keedy, the Advanced Career Education Coordinator at the West Virginia Department of Education (WVDE). Why is that the case? One reason is a disconnect between West Virginia workers and the skills needed by local employers. With many young West Virginians either leaving [&#8230;]The post SWEEP: Training West Virginia&#8217;s Entrepreneurs appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Region I–Planning and Development Council Executive Director Jason Roberts Email j&#97;&#115;&#x6f;&#x6e;&#x72;&#x6f;b&#101;&#114;&#116;&#x73;&#x40;&#x72;eg&#105;&#111;&#x6e;&#x6f;&#x6e;ep&#100;&#99;&#x2e;&#x6f;&#x72;gThe post Region I–Planning and Development Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4555 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4555

To authorize the participation in overseas interagency counterterrorism 
 task forces of personnel of the Department of Homeland Security, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 5, 2017

 Mr. Rutherford (for himself, Mr. Higgins of Louisiana, Mr. Gallagher, 
Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Garrett, Mr. McCaul, and Mr. Katko) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                                Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the participation in overseas interagency counterterrorism 
 task forces of personnel of the Department of Homeland Security, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``DHS Interagency Counterterrorism 
Task Force Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. OVERSEAS INTERAGENCY COUNTERTERRORISM TASK FORCE PARTICIPATION.

    Section 102 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 112) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsections:
    ``(h) Coordination With Other Federal Departments and Agencies 
Overseas.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to assign 
        Department personnel to participate in overseas interagency 
        counterterrorism task forces to--
                    ``(A) facilitate the sharing of counterterrorism 
                information; and
                    ``(B) combat the threat of terrorism and associated 
                risks to the United States stemming from overseas 
                sources of conflict or terrorism,
        as determined by the Secretary.
            ``(2) Personnel.--In carrying out this subsection, the 
        Secretary may assign personnel from any component of the 
        Department the Secretary determines necessary to participate in 
        the overseas counterterrorism task forces referred to in 
        paragraph (1).''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 28, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                          16,404
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      857
<ALLOWANCES>                                       299
<INVENTORY>                                     15,464
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,601
<PP&E>                                          43,864
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,128
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,057
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,669
<BONDS>                                            971
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,776
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,057
<SALES>                                        192,493
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               192,493
<CGS>                                          130,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  130,957
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                66,092
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   252
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 904
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,460)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (977)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,483)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,483)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.35)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.35)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Restatement reflected herein is the result of adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share".
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Collierville Subsection 8** 

**- 304(16).**  **Permits and Fees**

**- Reporting Requirements.** 

(a) Except as provided below, each permitted stationary air pollution source must submit to the Department an annual report that establishes the amount
of actual emissions of ea ch regulated pollutant, including carbon monoxide, for that source. This report will be for the emissions of that source that occurred during the calendar year starting in 1991 and continuing for succeeding years thereafter. The Department may request, a nd the air pollution source shall provide, additional information on the emissions data submitted when the Department determines, the data previously provided is inadequate to establish the actual type or amount of emissions from the source subject to fees

.

(b) Not including air toxics as they are defined in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 and the amendments thereto, if the source emits fewer than twenty five (25) tons of actual emissions of pollutant during a year, it may at its option, use as the ac tual emissions figure, its permitted pollutant levels where available and known. If the source is a "major source" under the air toxics provisions of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 it too must calculate its actual emission of regulated pollutants. Failure to provide, on a timely basis, any additional information requested shall be considered failure to pay the fees.

8

- 304(16), p. 1
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1562]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

        IN HONOR OF CLEVELAND CITY COUNCILMAN KENNETH L. JOHNSON

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 19, 2012

  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in honor of Councilman 
Kenneth L. Johnson, who has been serving Ward 4 on the Cleveland City 
Council since 1980.
  Councilman Johnson has served Cleveland with a focus on enriching 
Cleveland youth through recreational and academic programs. He is 
responsible for starting free overnight summer and winter camping trips 
where youth from the city have the opportunity to experience different 
environments. Johnson has always been an outspoken believer in quality 
recreational activities for young people to help them learn important 
lifelong leadership and social skills.
  Along with working for the Cleveland youth, Councilman Johnson has 
supported bringing new jobs to Cleveland through development and 
investment in the community. He has strived to give those seeking work 
new opportunities by starting computer training programs across the 
city. He also began a volunteer street cleaning, tree cutting, and 
overall beautification program for senior citizens and disabled 
residents in his ward.
  Councilman Johnson has been the only Council Member in Cleveland 
history to have a building named after him while still holding office. 
The Kenneth L. Johnson Recreation Center was dedicated in October 2001 
and has established an area for young people to gather and develop in a 
healthy environment.
  Mr. Speaker and colleagues, please join me in honoring the hard work 
and dedication Councilman Kenneth L. Johnson has shown serving the 
Cleveland community.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 No. 333-42533 and
No. 333-86001 (pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan and the 1998 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated), and Forms S-3 No. 333-33710,
No. 333-51250 and No. 333-53538 of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated February 21, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

| |  | Ernst & Young LLP
| |  | -----------------

Palo
Alto, California
March 27, 2002

---

QuickLinks
1

Farquharson, Chenise

From: Morgan, Ruthw

Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 4:23 PM

To: Muellerleile, Caryn; Jutras, Nathaniel; Brown, Stephanie N.; Adams, Darryl

Cc: Shaw, Betsy; Eagles, Tom; Goffman, Joseph; Saltman, Tamara; Mcquilkin, Wendy; 

Morgan, Ruthw; Jordan, Deborah; Cyran, Carissa; Stewart, Lori; Knapp, Kristien; McCoy, 

Britney; Millett, John; Dennis, Allison; Drinkard, Andrea; Hamilton, Sabrina; Faulkner, 

Martha; Matthews, Barbara; Owens, Nicole; Pritchard, Eileen; Farquharson, Chenise; 

Lemon, Mollie; Friedman, Kristina; Morris, Stephanie; Free, Laura; Brooks, Patricia

Subject: SAN 5873: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Proposed New Listings of Substitutes; 

Change of Listing Status and Reinterpretation of Unacceptability for Closed Cell Foam 

Products under the Significant New Alternatives Policy Program; and Revision of Cl

Attachments: 5873 SNAP Status Change Rule2 - Transmittal Memo to OP_CLEAN.docx; 5873 Signed 

Routing Slip 2016-01-22-163046.pdf; 5873 Action Memo Signed 

2016-01-22-162943.pdf

To Office of Policy for review and submittal to OMB. 

01/20/2016 SAN#: 5873 CMS Control #:

 

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Proposed New Listings of 

Substitutes; Change of Listing Status and Reinterpretation of 

Unacceptability for Closed Cell Foam Products under the 

Significant New Alternatives Policy Program; and Revision of 

Clean Air Act Section 608's Venting Prohibition for Propane 

Tier: 3 RIN#:2060-AN33 OAQPS 

OP/Caryn Muellerleile, OP/Darryl Adams, OP/Nathaniel Jutras, OP/StephanieN Brown, OAR Correspondence Unit, OAR 

Reg Processing Team, OAP File 

NPRM is ready for OMB 

Comments: 60 day Expedited OMB review requested. 

OAP Reg Contact: Mollie Lemon - 202 343-9859 

OAP Mgmt. Level Reviewer: Kristina Friedman - 202 343-9281 

Return to: Ruth Morgan 

 564-1326, 6358 AR North
## Explanation of 3 year 99 th 

## Percentile Design Value for the Musser Park site in

Muscatine, I A as Calculate d with Zero Value Substitution for Flagged Data by

Region 7 (for the 3 year periods 2008

- 2010 and 2009

- 2011)

Design Value calculation with zeros substituted for flagged data.

If zeros are substituted for flagged data, then together with the valid data (data containing 75% of daily

hourly average data), you have X valid data points, one for each day of the year of complete data . These

X values are then arranged in order from least to greatest. To find the 99 th percentile value of this

annual data set

, you use the following equation:

In the case of 365 days of valid data (i.e., days with 75% complete data for the day)

0.99 (# of days with valid dat a in a particular year ) + 1

0.99 (365) + 1

361.35 + 1 At this point

, values to the right of the decimal are truncated

362 The value in the 362 nd position (when arranged from lowest to highest) is the 99 th percentile

value for that specific year (when there 365 days of valid data)

.

In t he case of years 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011 the 99 th percentile values are as follows;

2008 = 203.2 ppb

2009 = 0.0 ppb

2010 = 133.6 ppb

2011 = 247.9 ppb

3 year design value calculation with zero substitution for flags

– 2008 through 2010

(2008 99 th % + 2009 99 th % + 2010 99 th %) / 3

(203.2 + 0.0 + 133.6) / 3

(336.8) / 3

112.266667 As the standard is set at a whole number (75) you round to the whole number using the

tenths position. 0.4 and below rounds down , 0.5 and above rounds up.

112 ppb

112 ppb is the 2008

- 2010 99 th Percentile Design Value.

3 year design value calculation with zero substitution for flags

– 2009 through 2011

(2009 99 th % + 2010 99 th % + 2011 99 th %) / 3

(0.0 + 133.6 + 247.9) / 3

(381.5) / 3

127.166666 As the standard is set at a whole number (75) you round to the whole number using the

tenths position. 0.4 and below rounds down, 0.5 and above rounds up.

127 ppb

127 ppb is the 2009

- 2011 99 th Percentile Design Value

Please see attached spreadsheets for more details (2009 data is 0

. 0 for the entire year).
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6305

LARRY COCHRAN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DR. JEAN LINDZAU; DR. AMY ROSENTHAL; DR. CARL REID , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. ( 5:15

- ct

- 03139

- D )

Submitted : July 27, 2017 Decided: July 31, 2017

Before AGEE and FLOYD , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Larry Cochran, Appellant Pro Se. Lucian P. Sbarra, HEDRICK GARDNER KINCHELOE & GAROFALO, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; G. Norman Acker, III, Rudy E. Renfer, Ass istant United States Attorneys, Christina Ann Kelley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Larry Cochran appeals the district court’s o rder denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis trict court. Cochran v. Lindzau , No. 3:15

- ct

- 03139

- D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 21, 2017) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional pr ocess.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-11596

Summary Calendar

JAMES L. ROSS,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

THE CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS,

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:17-CV-570

Before SMITH, WIENER, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant James L. Ross appeals the district court’s dismissal 

with prejudice of his lawsuit against Defendant-Appellee the City of Dallas, 

Texas, alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. §1983 and 18 U.S.C. §1964. Ross’s 

claims arose from the City’s foreclosure of property occupied but not owned or 

leased by Ross.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 28, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-11596 Document: 00515014693 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/28/2019
No. 18-11596

2

We have reviewed the record, the parties’ briefs, and the record 

excerpts for this appeal, and we have considered the November 14, 2018 

Memorandum Opinion and Order of the district court which sets out in detail 

the relevant facts and history of this almost decade-old litigation. As a result 

of our review, we are satisfied that the district court ruled correctly in 

determining that Ross take nothing against the City of Dallas and that this 

case be dismissed with prejudice. For essentially the reasons thus set forth 

by the district court, its Judgment of even date with its opinion is

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 18-11596 Document: 00515014693 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/28/2019
Exhibit 32.1





WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350





Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Thomas SteippThomas Steipp, President and Chief Executive OfficerMay 16, 2011
## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. 73,265 

### EX PARTE WESLEYJOSEPH HOGAN, Applicant
ONAPPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FROM COLLIN COUNTY 

### The opinion was delivered per curiam.
OPINION This is a post-conviction application for a writ ofhabeas corpus filed pursuant to Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. Applicant was convicted oftheft. Punishment was assessed at 

### twenty years imprisonment. This conviction was affirmed, Hogan v. State. No. 05-94-01055- CR (Tex. App.— Dallas, delivered August 31, 1995, no pet.). 

### Applicant contends, inter alia, that hewas denied anopportunity to file apro se 

### petition for discretionary review because his appellate attorney did not timely advise him as to his right topursue discretionary. The trial court has entered findings offact that Applicant was

### not timely advised of his right to pursue apro se petition for discretionary review. In Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997), we held that for counsel to render effective assistance on appeal, he, or she, must notify the client the case has been affirmed and that the client can pursue discretionary review on his own. Applicant is entitled to relief. The proper remedy in a case like this is to return Applicant to the point at which he can file a petition for discretionary review. He may then follow the proper procedures in order that a meaningful petition for discretionary review may be filed. For purposes ofthe Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure, all time limits shall be calculated as ifthe Court ofAppeals' decision had been rendered on the day the mandate of this Court in this cause issues. We hold that should Applicant desire to seek discretionary 

### review, he must take affirmative steps to see that his petition is filed in the Court ofAppeals within thirty days after the mandate of this Court has issued. 

### Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminal Justice, Institutional and Pardons and Paroles Divisions.
PER CURIAM
DELIVERED: December 16, 1998 DO NOT PUBLISH 

### Holland, J., not participating. ATrue Copy 

## T?oyC.Bennett, Jr., Clerk CourtTotCriminalAppeals^Texas By*( Deputy
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000805

28-DEC-2015

09:19 AM