### 39259 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.

(4) You may also review copies of the service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: http://www.archives.gov/federal

_register/ code

_ of

_ federal

_regulations/ ibr

_locations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 17,
2011. Kalene C. Yanamura, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–16057 Filed 7–5–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**

**[Docket No. FAA–2011–0116; Airspace Docket No. 11–ANE–1]** 

**Establishment of Class E Airspace; Brunswick, ME** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Final rule; correction.

**SUMMARY :**  This action corrects the effective date of a final rule that was published in the Federal Register on June 22, 2011, that establishes Class E airspace at Brunswick Executive Airport, Brunswick, ME.

**DATES :**  The effective date is moved from 0901 UTC, August 25, 2011, to 0901 UTC, July 28, 2011.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  John Fornito, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404)
305–6364.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  History

Federal Register Docket No. FAA– 2011–0116, Airspace Docket No. 11– ANE–1, published on June 22, 2011 (76 FR 36285), establishes Class E airspace at Brunswick Executive Airport, Brunswick, ME. This action will move up the effective date of this rulemaking, as the new approach procedures are to be published July 28, 2011. The original August 25, 2011, effective date was an oversight by the FAA. The FAA has determined good cause exists to have an effective date less than 30 days after the publication of this final rule because of the financial hardship the airport and its employees would incur with a delay of this magnitude.

The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. It, therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority.

This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part, A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority as it establishes Class E airspace at Brunswick Executive Airport, Brunswick, ME.

Correction to Final Rule

In final rule FR Doc 2011–15305, on page 36285 in the Federal Register of June 22, 2011 (76 FR 36285), make the following correction:

On page 36285, in the third column, in the **DATES** section, remove the date August 28, 2011, and replace with the date July 25, 2011.

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 1963 Comp., p. 389.

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 28,

2011. Rebecca B. MacPherson, Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2011–16783 Filed 7–5–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 91**

**[Docket No. FAA–2001–11133; Amendment No. 91–323]** 

**Manual Requirements**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

**ACTION :**  Final rule; technical amendment.

**SUMMARY :**  The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is making a minor technical change to a final rule published in the Federal Register on July 27, 2004. This final rule established new requirements for the certification,operation, and maintenance of lightsport aircraft under several regulations. In the final rule, the FAA inadvertently did not change an affected regulatory reference in one section. The FAA is issuing this technical amendment to correct that oversight.

**DATES :**  Effective Dates: This rule becomes effective on August 5, 2011.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Kim Barnette, Flight Standards Service, Aircraft Maintenance Division, AFS– 300, Federal Aviation Administration, 950 L’Enfant Plaza North, SW., Washington, DC 20024; telephone (202)385–6403; facsimile (202) 385–6474; email Kim.A.Barnette@faa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The FAA published a final rule entitled ‘‘Certification of Aircraft and Airmen for the Operation of Light-Sport Aircraft,’’ in the Federal Register on July 27, 2004 (69 FR 44772). That final rule established new requirements for the certification, operation, and maintenance of light-sport aircraft. That final rule also redesignated the concluding text of § 43.9(a) as § 43.9(d) but did not revise a cross-reference in § 91.417(a)(2)(vi) to reflect the redesignation of that text. This technical amendment will correct § 91.417(a)(2)(vi) to reference the redesignated text in § 43.9(d). List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 91

Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Accordingly, Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 91 is amended as follows:

The Amendment

**PART 91—GENERAL OPERATING AND FLIGHT RULES** 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 91 continues to read as follows:


### 39260 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 6, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 1155, 40103, 40113, 40120, 44101, 44111, 44701, 44709, 44711, 44712, 44715, 44716, 44717, 44722, 46306, 46315, 46316, 46504, 46506–46507, 47122, 47508, 47528–47531, articles 12 and 29 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation (61 Stat.1180).

■ 2. Amend § 91.417 by revising paragraph (a)(2)(vi) to read as follows:

**§ 91.417 Maintenance records.**

(a) * * * (2) * * * (vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each major alteration to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors, propellers, and appliances.

* * * * *

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 29,
2011. Dennis R. Pratte, Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2011–16863 Filed 7–5–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE**

**Bureau of Economic Analysis**

**15 CFR Part 806**

**[Docket No. 110321207–1206–01]**

**RIN 0691–AA78**

**Direct Investment Surveys: Alignment of Regulations With Current Practices** 

**AGENCY :**  Bureau of Economic Analysis, Commerce.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This final rule amends regulations of the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) related to direct investment surveys. Specifically, BEA is eliminating reporting requirements for several direct investment surveys that are no longer necessary because the information is collected on other surveys of direct investment conducted by BEA. The surveys that are eliminated from the regulations are: A survey of foreign direct investment in the U.S. seafood industry, two schedules of expenditures for property, plant, and equipment of U.S. direct investment abroad, and two industry classification questionnaires. In addition, BEA is eliminating the reporting requirements for two surveys of new foreign direct investment in the United States. BEA suspended collection of these surveys in 2009 in order to align its international survey program with available resources. BEA is also making other minor revisions to its regulations to eliminate outdated information. **DATES :**  This final rule will be effective August 5, 2011.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  David H. Galler, Chief, Direct Investment Division (BE–50), Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230; e-mail David.Galler@bea.gov or phone (202) 606–9835.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On April 7, 2011, BEA published a notice of proposed rulemaking to align its regulations for direct investment surveys with current practices. No comments on the proposed rule were received. Thus the proposed rule is adopted without change. This final rule amends 15 CFR Part 806 by revising §§ 806.14, 806.15, and 806.18 to remove the reporting requirements for several direct investment surveys. The surveys

are: BE–13, Initial Report on a Foreign

Person’s Direct or Indirect Acquisition, Establishment, or Purchase of the Operating Assets, of a U.S. Business Enterprise, Including Real Estate BE–14, Report by a U.S. Person Who

Assists or Intervenes in the Acquisition of a U.S. Business Enterprise by, or Who Enters into a Joint Venture With, a Foreign Person BE–21, Survey of Foreign Direct

Investment in U.S. Business Enterprises Engaged in the Processing, Packaging, or Wholesale Distribution of Fish or Seafoods BE–133B, Follow-up Schedule of

Expenditures for Property, Plant, and Equipment of U.S. Direct Investment Abroad BE–133C, Schedule of Expenditures for

Property, Plant, and Equipment of U.S. Direct Investment Abroad BE–507, Industry Classification

Questionnaire BE–607, Industry Classification

Questionnaire BEA is removing the reporting requirements for the BE–13 and the BE– 14 surveys which were suspended in 2009 in order to align its international survey program with available resources. The surveys had been used to collect identification information on the U.S. business being established or acquired and on the new foreign owner, information on the cost of the investment and source of funding, and limited financial and operating data for the newly established or acquired entity. The data had been used to measure the amount of new foreign direct investment in the United States and assess its impact on the U.S. economy. BEA continues to identify newly acquired or established U.S. affiliates of foreign investors and bring them into its international survey program through the BE–12, BE–15, and BE–605 surveys, which are the benchmark, annual, and quarterly surveys of foreign direct investment in the United States, respectively, but they are not separately identified in BEA’s published statistics.

BEA is eliminating the regulations for the BE–21, BE–133B, BE–133C, BE–507, and BE–607 surveys since they have not been conducted in many years and are no longer necessary because the information is collected on other surveys of direct investment conducted by BEA.

In addition, BEA is making other minor revisions to its regulations to eliminate outdated information. These revisions eliminate references to outdated information regarding BE–10 survey forms and inactive OMB control numbers.

Executive Order 12866

This final rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of E.O.
12866.

Executive Order 13132

This final rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications as that term is defined in E.O. 13132. Paperwork Reduction Act

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approvals under the Paperwork Reduction Act for the seven surveys that BEA is eliminating have expired. The information collection approval for the BE–13 and BE–14 (under OMB control number 0608–0035) expired on August 31, 2009; the BE–21 approval (OMB control number 0608–0050) expired September 30, 1983; the BE–133B and BE–133C (OMB control number 0608– 0024) expired December 31, 1994; the BE–507 approval (OMB control number 0608–0032) expired April 30, 1997; and the BE–607 approval (OMB control number 0608–0030) expired on May 31,
1991. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Chief Counsel for Regulation, Department of Commerce, has certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy, Small Business Administration, under the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The factual basis for the certification was published in the proposed rule and is not repeated here. No comments were received regarding the certification or the economic impact of the rule more