alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JORGE A. SEGOVIANO,

APPELLANT,

V.

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00190-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5

MARIA D. GUERRA,

APPELLEE.

§

§

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2015-CCV-00386)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and his sureties, if an, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2017.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

Hughes, J., Not Participating
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 27, 2016

a0919

Order 

Clerk

September 27, 2016

149145 & (57)

TAYLOR MADISON, a minor, by her

next friend LATRESE DICKENS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 149145

COA: 312880

Wayne CC: 12-003944-AV

AAA OF MICHIGAN,

Defendant-Appellee.

____________________________________/

By order of February 4, 2015, the application for leave to appeal the March 13, 

2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in

Hodge v State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins Co (Docket No. 149043). On order of the 

Court, the case having been decided on June 6, 2016, ___ Mich ___ (2016), the 

application and motion for peremptory reversal are considered. In light of our opinion in 

Hodge, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE 

the judgment of the Court of Appeals, REINSTATE the November 3, 2011 judgment 

entered in the 36th District Court, and REMAND this case to the district court for further 

proceedings.
A B

**Denominator Pump Configuration**  **25,50,75,100 % of BEP flow &**  **Equal Weighting** **75,100,110 %**

**of BEP flow & Equal**  **Weighting** Pump + DOE Min Eff Motor (Bare Pump) 39.05 48.83 Pump + Higher Eff Motor 38.4448.11 Pump + Higher Eff Motor + VFD 21.3643.07 Pump + DOE Min Eff Motor 1.040 1.300 Pump + Motor 1.024 1.281 Pump + Motor + Control 0.569 1.147 Pump + Min Eff Motor 0.819 1.025 Pump + Motor 0.807 1.009 Pump + Motor + Control 0.4480.904 Bare Pump 0.795 0.686 Pump + Motor 0.795 0.686 Pump + Motor + Control 0.339 0.585 Bare Pump 0.863 0.744 Pump + Motor 0.863 0.744 Pump + Motor + Control 0.3680.634
Hydro Power 1.691 1.248 Minimum Pump Efficiency 0.917 0.681 Market Average Efficiency 0.995 0.739

Bare Pump Pump + Motor Pump + Motor + Control Efficiency Minimum Pump Efficiency

Denom at each load point Market Average Pump Efficiency **Weighting**

No Denom

Hydraulic Power

Reference Shaft Power**Denominator Needs:**

Between 0 and 1 Communicate relative pump performance **Next Meeting (4/29 + 30)** Normalized weights instead of equal weighting Denominator discussion Metric Nomenclature Engineering and LCC Assumptions and Results **Send out in advance** Sales weighted efficiency values Incremental costs Pump PER Calculator with potential standard levels Up to date slides and spreadsheet
EXHIBIT 11.1

<TABLE>
                   NETCOM ON-LINE COMMUNICATION SERVICES, INC.
                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<CAPTION>
                                                                                  Year ended
                                                                                 December 31,
                                                             -------------------------------------------------
                                                                   1996              1995               1994
                                                             --------------     --------------    ------------

<S>                                                             <C>             <C>               <C>
Net income (loss) ........................................      (44,265,000)    $  (14,064,000)   $   (100,000)
                                                             ==============     ==============    ============

Computation of weighted average
    common and common equivalent
    shares outstanding:
        Common stock .....................................       11,498,000          8,350,000       3,606,000
        Options ..........................................                -                  -               -
        Option shares related to
            SAB No. 55, 64, and 83 .......................                -                  -         671,000
        Convertible preferred shares
            related to SAB No. 55, 64,
            and 83 .......................................                -                  -       1,650,000
Total weighted average common
    and common equivalent shares
    outstanding ..........................................       11,498,000          8,350,000       5,927,000
                                                             --------------     --------------    ------------
Net income (loss) per share ..............................   $        (3.85)    $        (1.68)   $      (0.02)
                                                             ==============     ==============    ============

For each of the three years presented above, there is no difference between
primary and fully diluted earnings per share.
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5710]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. PAUL:
        H.R. 6342.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       This legislation is authorized by Article I, Section 8 of 
     The Constitution:
       ``To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for 
     carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other 
     Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the 
     United States.''
       This includes the power to require federal the Food and 
     Drug Administration (FDA) to allow terminally-ill patients to 
     use non-approved drugs when the patient's physician certifies 
     they have no other options and the patient executes written 
     informed consent that they are aware of any potential risks 
     give small business a grace period to correct any violations 
     of federal regulations before imposing job-destroying fines 
     and other sanctions on the business.
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of President and Chief Operating Officer**

 

**Pursuant to**

 

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended **September 30, 2003** (the“Report”) of **MCG Capital Corporation** (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, **Steven F. Tunney**, the President and Chief Operating Officer of the Registrant,hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theRegistrant.
EXHIBIT 31

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


<PAGE>

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                         302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Ted Kozub, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Bio-American Capital
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  February 23, 2004


/s/ Ted Kozub
-----------------------
Ted Kozub,
President, CEO, & CFO
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D825]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    COMMITTEE MEETINGS FOR TUESDAY,

                             AUGUST 7, 2012

        (Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated)

                                 Senate

  No meetings/hearings scheduled.

                                 House

  No hearings are scheduled.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andrew A. Greenafage, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Wexner, J.), imposed April 18,1990.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed *(see, People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1; *see also, People v Moisset,*76 NY2d 909). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Kunzeman, Harwood and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Order entered September 5, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00099-CV

WILLIAM DREXEL AND SANDY DREXEL, Appellants

V.

TOLL BROTHERS, INC. AND TOLL DALLAS TX LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-03255-2012

ORDER

Before the Court is appellees’ September 4, 2018 second unopposed motion for extension 

of time to file brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than 

October 9, 2018. We caution appellees that further extension requests will be disfavored. 

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
Order entered September 8, 2020

In The



### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01544

- CR

BRANDY NICHOLE CROWE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Cr iminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16

- 34211

- X

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s September 3, 2020 second motion to extend

the t im e to fil e its brief

. The State tendered its brief with the motion. We GRANT

the mo tion and ORDER the State’s brief filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
# C_2008183EN.01001202.xml

| 19.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Roma (Italy) lodged on 25 April 2008 — Pontina Ambiente Srl v Regione Lazio

(Case C-172/08)

(2008/C 183/23)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Roma

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pontina Ambiente Srl

Applicant:

Defendant: Regione Lazio

Defendant:

Question referred

Is Article 3(26) and (31) of Law No 549/95 incompatible with Articles 12, 14, 43 and 46 of the EEC Treaty and with Directives 35/2000/EC (1) and 31/1999/EC (2), with reference in particular to the principles laid down in the preamble to Directive 35/2000/EC and Article 10 of Directive 31/1999/EC, according to which, in particular, the Member States are required to prevent situations of inequality throughout the Community market by adopting provisions to combat late payments in order to prohibit abuse of freedom of contract to the disadvantage of the creditor where the principal purpose of a contract is to procure the debtor additional liquidity at the expense of the creditor and by making provision for compensation for the loss suffered by the creditor in the event of late payment by the debtor?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 2000 L 200, p. 35.

1

(2)  OJ 1999 L 182, p. 1.

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 8 (Thursday, January 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 1975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00388]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12303]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Hidden Faces: Covered 
Portraits of the Renaissance'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Hidden Faces: Covered Portraits 
of the Renaissance'' at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New 
York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their 
temporary exhibition or display within the United States as 
aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4e3d2b2d3a2721207c7a7b770e3d3a2f3a2b60292138"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="73001610071a1c1d4147464a3300071207165d141c05">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-00388 Filed 1-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, theundersigned Chief Financial Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008,(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Gerald Morrow                       |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Gerald Morrow, Chief  Financial Officer |
| May 15, 2008                       |

 

37

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6476]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                MEASURE PLACED ON THE CALENDAR--S. 3576

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, S. 3576 is at the desk and due for a second 
reading.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will read the bill by 
title for a second time.
  The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:

       A bill (S. 3576) to provide limitations on United States 
     assistance, and for other purposes.

  Mr. REID. I would object to any further proceedings with respect to 
this bill at this time.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Objection having been heard, the 
bill will be placed on the calendar.

                          ____________________
```
!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

GEORGIA

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

TENNESSEE

KENTUCKY

OHIO PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

VIRGINIA

NEW YORK

WEST

VIRGINIA

Appalachian Regional Commission, 2016

Data source: U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration

Coal Production by

County, 2015

(Thousand Short Tons)

!( 10,000 - 25,224

!( 5,000 - 9,999

!( 500 - 4,999

!( 4 - 499

0 50 100

Miles
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4730-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Alaska (FEMA-4730-DR), dated August 23, 2023, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on December 14, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Brian F. Schiller, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Lance E. Davis as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-00241 Filed 1-8-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00422-CV

FOUNTAIN OAKS TOWN CENTER, 

LLC AND JEFFREY A. RATTIKIN

APPELLANTS

V.

DR. MARTIN MCGONAGLE AND 

WIFE MARY E. MCGONAGLE

APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered “Appellants' Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” 

It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss 

the appeals of appellants Fountain Oaks Town Center, LLC and Jeffrey A. 

Rattikin. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Costs of the appeals shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: February 17, 2011