alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8Nos. 333-122551, 333-112448, 333-103228, 333-92572,333-83954, 333-81396, 333-43952, 333-33338, 333-93653,333-85161, 333-51117, 333-33197, and 333-06301)pertaining to the 1998 Supplemental Stock Option/ Stock Issuance Plan, 1993Stock Option/ Stock Issuance Plan, and Employee Stock Purchase Plan ofUltratech, Inc. of our reports dated March 3, 2006, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements and schedule of Ultratech, Inc.,Ultratech, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting of Ultratech, Inc, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|                       | /s/ ERNST &  YOUNG LLP |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------|
| Palo Alto, California |                            |
| March 3, 2006    |                            |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Blast
Energy Services, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John OKeefe, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 14, 2005



By:

/s/    JOHN OKEEFEJohn OKeefeCo-Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial OfficerPrincipal Accounting Officer
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00246

- CV

In the Matter of C.P. §

§

§

§ From County Court at Law No. 1

o f Wichita County (38693

- LR

- D )

Oct ober 2 3

, 2014

P er C uriam



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the

trial court is reversed

, and we remand the case to the trial court for further

proceedings consistent with this opinion.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 12, 2021

NO. 03-20-00402-CV

Mainthia Technologies, Inc. and Hemant Mainthia, Appellants

v.

Recruiting Force, LLC d/b/a Recruit Veterans, on behalf of itself and derivatively on 

behalf of RVMTI, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 425TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on July 21, 2020. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s interlocutory order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s interlocutory

order. The appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the 

court below.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4928 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that the United States 

district court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive jurisdiction 

over actions arising under the immigration laws, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2018 

Mr. BRAT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that 

the United States district court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive jurisdiction over actions arising under the immigration laws, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JURISDICTION OVER CASES ARISING UNDER 

4 THE IMMIGRATION LAWS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 85 of title 28, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4928 IH

1 ‘‘§ 1370. Jurisdiction over cases arising under the im2 migration laws 

3 ‘‘(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 

4 district court for the District of Columbia shall have exclu5 sive jurisdiction over— 

6 ‘‘(1) any case arising under the immigration 

7 laws (as such term is defined in section 101 of the 

8 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et 

9 seq.)); or 

10 ‘‘(2) any claim brought by any foreign national 

11 challenging an order of removal from the United 

12 States or any other action authorized under the Im13 migration and Nationality Act.’’. 

14 (b) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at 

15 the beginning of chapter 84 of title 28, United States 

16 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘1370. Jurisdiction over cases arising under the immigration laws.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Order entered July 9, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01752-CV

STUTZ ROAD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., Appellants

V.

WEEKLEY HOMES, L.P. D/B/A DAVID WEEKLEY HOMES, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-10-01696-B

ORDER

We GRANT the July 2, 2014 third motion of appellant Len-Mac Development Corp. for 

an extension of time to file a brief. We ORDER the brief tendered to this Court by Len-Mac 

Development Corp. on July 8, 2014 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4856 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4856

  To direct the Joint Committee on the Library to obtain a statue of 
      Shirley Chisholm for placement in the United States Capitol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2018

  Ms. Clarke of New York (for herself, Ms. Adams, Ms. Barragan, Mrs. 
  Beatty, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Ms. Blunt Rochester, Mr. 
 Brown of Maryland, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Courtney, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Danny K. 
Davis of Illinois, Mrs. Dingell, Mr. Espaillat, Mr. Evans, Ms. DeGette, 
   Mr. Al Green of Texas, Mr. Hastings, Mr. Higgins of New York, Ms. 
  Jackson Lee, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. Jeffries, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. 
 Kelly of Illinois, Mrs. Lawrence, Mr. Lawson of Florida, Ms. Lee, Mr. 
 Lewis of Georgia, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Ms. McCollum, 
   Mr. McEachin, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Meeks, Ms. Meng, Mr. Nadler, Mrs. 
    Napolitano, Ms. Norton, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Payne, Mr. Pocan, Mr. 
  Richmond, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Rush, Ms. Sanchez, Mr. Serrano, Ms. 
Sewell of Alabama, Mr. Smith of Washington, Ms. Velazquez, Mrs. Watson 
     Coleman, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Ms. Hanabusa, Ms. Judy Chu of 
California, Mr. Clay, Mr. Veasey, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Crist, and 
    Mr. Carson of Indiana) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Joint Committee on the Library to obtain a statue of 
      Shirley Chisholm for placement in the United States Capitol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLACEMENT OF STATUE OF SHIRLEY CHISHOLM IN UNITED STATES 
              CAPITOL.

    (a) Obtaining Statue.--Not later than 5 years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Joint Committee on the Library shall enter 
into an agreement to obtain a statue of Shirley Chisholm, under such 
terms and conditions as the Joint Committee considers appropriate 
consistent with applicable law. The Joint Committee may authorize the 
Architect of the Capitol to enter into the agreement and related 
contracts required under this subsection on its behalf, under such 
terms and conditions as the Joint Committee may require.
    (b) Placement.--The Joint Committee on the Library shall place the 
statue obtained under subsection (a) in a suitable permanent location 
in the United States Capitol.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this Act, and 
any amounts so appropriated shall remain available until expended.
                                 <all>
```
Find more data on this and other topics at arc.gov/chartbook

HOUSEHOLD INCOME HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY SUBREGION

POVERTY RATE POVERTY RATE BY SUBREGION

Appalachia’s median household 

income is 

Appalachia’s median household 

income is lowest in Central 

Appalachia and highest in 

Southern Appalachia.

Appalachia's poverty rate 

decreased 

both overall

and in each 

of the 

Appalachian 

subregions. 

of the U.S. figure.

$49,747

APPALACHIA

$60,293

U.S.

-0.2pp

-0.5pp

-0.3pp

-2.3pp

-1.8pp

82.5% 

14.1%

U.S.

15.8%

APPALACHIA 

Although the Region’s poverty 

rate declined 1.2 percentage 

points since 2009–2013, 

Appalachia’s poverty rate remains

higher than the U.S. average.

pp=percentage points





 



 



 



 



 

IN APPALACHIA

INCOME & POVERTY

DATA SNAPSHOT

Use The Appalachian Region: A Data Overview from the 2014–2018 American Community Survey—also known as the 

Chartbook—to discover more about income and poverty in Appalachia. Authored by the Population Reference Bureau with the 

Appalachian Regional Commission, the Chartbook features data on income, employment, education, and other indicators at 

the regional, subregional, state, and county levels, and examines data change over recent years to show trends. The Chartbook 

draws on data collected before the COVID-19 crisis to provide benchmarking for when new information becomes available.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Colony RIH Holdings, Inc. and Resorts
International Hotel and Casino, Inc. (collectively, the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Francis X.
McCarthy, Senior Vice President Finance/CFO and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ FRANCIS X. MCCARTHY              
|Francis X. McCarthy                  
|Executive Vice President -Finance/CFO
|                                     
|August 14, 2006                      



35
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies (the “Company”),hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A(Amendment No. 1) of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,2004, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Ricardo A. Salas                       |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Ricardo A. Salas, Chief  Executive Officer |
| July 20, 2006                         |

 

----
### Docket No: FAA

- 2015

- 3629 Docket No: 2015

- NM

- 011

- AD



## FA A M C A I A D W O R KSHEET ( C O N T I NU E D )

. C on t acts. W ith w h o m o u tside t he F A A h a s th i s prop os al been di s cu s sed?

Organ i zat i on P erson C ont a cted D ate R e s pon s e

N at i o n a l B u s ine s s Air c r af t As s o ci at i o n E li C ott i 1 / 22 / 1 5

Re g i o n a l Airline As s o ci at i o n 1 / 22 / 1 5

Air c r af t O w ners & P il ot s A s s o ci at i o n R o bert Ha ck m a n 1 / 22 / 1 5

Airlines fo r A m e r ica R o bert I r e l a nd 1 / 22 / 1 5
**Exhibit23.2**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.333-41905 and No. 333-68636) of National R.V. Holdings, Inc. of our reportdated October 6, 2005, except for the restatement discussed in the second andsixth paragraphs of Note 2 (not presented herein) to the consolidated financialstatements appearing under Item 8 of the Company’s 2004 Annual Report on Form10-K/A, as to which the date is March 21, 2006 relating to the financialstatements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 
| /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| Orange County,  California      |
| March 28, 2006                  |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               6
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (337)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,714
<PP&E>                                             971
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (829)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,282
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,730
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,453)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,282
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,388
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (637)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   898
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 342
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,532)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        39
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,571)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.72)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (the “Report”) of MCG Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Beverly Jane Alley, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:


|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/ BEVERLY JANE ALLEYName:Beverly Jane AlleyTitle:Chief Financial OfficerDateJuly 28, 2015
<PAGE>


                              ARM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
                                515 WEST MARKET STREET
                              LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY 40202


                                                       December 4, 1997

Mr. John R. Lindholm
ARM Financial Group, Inc.
515 West Market Street
Louisville, Kentucky 40202

Dear John:

          This letter amendment (this "AMENDMENT") sets forth our mutual
understanding concerning an amendment to your Employment Agreement with ARM
Financial Group, Inc. (the "COMPANY") dated as of July 1, 1996 (the "EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT").

          1. Section 5.1.1 is hereby amended by inserting the words "the
     penultimate sentence of this Section 5.1.1 and" after the word "of" in
     the first line of Section 5.1.1.

          2.   Section 5.1.1 is hereby further amended by inserting the
     following as the penultimate sentence in such Section 5.1.1:

          "In the event the Executive terminates his employment hereunder
          pursuant to Section 5.4(iv) or (v), the payments described in the
          first sentence of this Section 5.1.1 shall be reduced by an amount
          equal to the payments received by the Executive as a Sale Bonus under
          the Company's Sale Bonus Plan."

          3.   The parenthetical contained in the second line of Section 5.4 is
     amended in its entirety to read as follows: "(without the Executive's prior
     written consent in the case of clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) below)".

          4.   Section 5.4 is further hereby amended by inserting a new
     subsection (ii) to read as follows and to renumber the subsections that
     follow accordingly:

          "(ii) a material diminution of the authority, responsibilities or
     positions of the Executive with the Company;"


<PAGE>

                                          2

          5.   This Amendment shall be governed in accordance with the laws of
     the State of New York.

          6.   Except as modified hereby, the Employment Agreement remains in
     full force and effect.

          Please evidence your agreement with this Amendment by executing the
acknowledgment set forth below.

                                        ARM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

                                        /s/ Frank V. Sica
                                        -------------------------
                                        Name:
                                        Title:

ACKNOWLEDGED AND
AGREED AS OF THE DATE
FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN


/s/ John R. Lindholm
---------------------
John R. Lindholm
ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber)

9 September 2008

Case T-144/08

**Luigi Marcuccio**

**v**

**Commission of the European Communities**

(Civil service – Social security – Refusal of the application for reimbursement of 100% of certain medical expenses incurred by the applicant)

**Application:**first, for annulment of the decision refusing the applicant’s claim for reimbursement of 100% of certain medical expenses
and, secondly, for an order that the Commission pay him EUR 89.56 by way of additional reimbursement of medical expenses or
as compensation for loss.

**Held:**The action is dismissed as inadmissible. Each party is to bear its own costs.

**Summary**

*Officials – Social security – Sickness insurance – Medical expenses – Serious illness – Reimbursement at 100% – Conditions*

*(Staff Regulations, Art. 72(1); Rules on Sickness Insurance, Art. 28 and Annex I, Section IV* *)*

The reimbursement of medical expenses at 100% under Article 72(1) of the Staff Regulations presupposes that the illness concerned
is regarded as one of the illnesses expressly referred to in that provision, or that the appointing authority recognises the
illness as being of a comparable seriousness to the illnesses referred to in that provision. To that end, it is manifestly
for the official concerned to state which is the illness in question and to produce supporting documents. Under Article 28
of the Rules on Sickness Insurance for Officials of the European Communities applications for reimbursement of expenses must
be accompanied by original supporting documents, and according to Section IV of Annex I to those Rules applications to have
an illness recognised as of a comparable seriousness to the four illnesses referred to in Article 72(1) of the Staff Regulations
must be accompanied by a report from the doctor treating the official concerned.

Where an application does not contain any new factor justifying the reimbursement at 100% of the medical expenses incurred
by the official in question, the administration’s silence following that application does not in any way alter his legal situation
resulting from the implied decision rejecting an earlier application in which he made that claim known to the administration,
and therefore does not constitute an act adversely affecting him within the meaning of Articles 90 and 91 of the Staff Regulations.

(see paras 30, 32, 34)