alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Biomarkers of Cognitive Decline.                    

*Date:*                         March 27, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Gianina Ramona Dumitrescu, Ph.D., MPH, Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, Suite 2N300, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 28092, 301-827-0696,                         *dumitrescurg@.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 4, 2024.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-00291 Filed 1-9-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# Menifee - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Gateway Area Development District Executive Director Joshua Farrow Email &#x6a;&#x6f;&#x73;&#x68;&#x75;&#x61;&#x2e;&#x66;&#x61;&#x72;&#x72;&#x6f;&#x77;&#x40;&#107;&#121;&#46;&#103;&#111;&#118;The post Gateway Area Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Biobehavioral and Behavioral Sciences Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         March 19, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Chi-Tso Chiu, Ph.D., Scientific Review Branch (SRB), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development, NIH, DHHS, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Rm. 2127B, Bethesda, MD 20817, (301) 435-7486,                         *chiuc@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 3, 2024.

Lauren A. Fleck, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-00113 Filed 1-5-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-74646) pertaining to the Checkmate Electronics, Inc. Employee
Incentive Stock Option Plan and the Checkmate Electronics, Inc. 1993 Stock
Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-93520) pertaining
to the Checkmate Electronics, Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan, the Checkmate
Electronics, Inc. 1994 Directors Stock Option Plan, and the Checkmate
Electronics, Inc. Non-Incentive Stock Option Agreement of our report dated
February 6, 1997, with respect to the financial statements of Checkmate
Electronics, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1996.



                                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 25, 1997
H. R. 4910 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide outer burial receptacles for 

remains buried in National Parks, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Cemetery Benefit 

Correction Act’’. 

SEC. 2. PROVISION OF OUTER BURIAL RECEPTACLES FOR REMAINS 

BURIED IN NATIONAL PARKS. 

Section 2306(e) of title 38, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ before ‘‘The Secretary of Veterans’’; 

(B) in subparagraph (A), as designated by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, by striking ‘‘The Secretary 

of the Army’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(B) The Secretary of the Army’’; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(C) The Secretary of the Interior shall provide an outer burial 

receptacle for each such a grave in an open national cemetery 

administered by the National Park Service.’’; 

(2) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘or in the Arlington National Cemetery’’ 

and inserting ‘‘, in the Arlington National Cemetery, or 

in a national cemetery administered by the National Park 

Service’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘or Secretary of the Army’’ and inserting 

‘‘, the Secretary of the Army, or the Secretary of the 

Interior’’; 

(3) in paragraph (3)(B)(ii), by striking ‘‘or, with respect 

to Arlington National Cemetery, the Secretary of the Army’’ 

and inserting ‘‘or the Secretary of the Army with respect to 

Arlington National Cemetery or the Secretary of the Interior 

with respect to a national cemetery administered by the 

National Park Service’’; and 

(4) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘or, with respect to 

Arlington National Cemetery, the Secretary of the Army’’ and 

inserting ‘‘or the Secretary of the Army with respect to 

Arlington National Cemetery or the Secretary of the Interior 
H. R. 4910—2 

with respect to a national cemetery administered by the 

National Park Service’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
----

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May 17, 2010  | By:    | /s/ John MacDonald             |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                                |   | John MacDonald                 |
|                                |   | Chief Financial Officer        |
|                                |   | (Principal Accounting Officer) |
#### SMOLEY v. NEW JERSEY ZINC CO.

No. 6975.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Aug. 4, 1939.

*315. ,. ,, -t t Addison C Ely of Westfield, N. J. (Nelson Littell and Albert C. Johnston, both of New York Qty, of counsel), for appel ant.

Wm. H. Davis, Charles W. Riley, James B. Christie and W. Peters Blanc, all of New York City, for appellee.

Before BIGGS and MARIS, Circuit Judges.

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissing a suit in equity.

The plaintiff averred in his bill that in 1928 he invented an entirely new method of separating zinc from cadmium and lead by means of a rectifying column and the use of a continuous process of fractional distillation and rectification; that this method had been used in the refining of petroleum but had never been applied to metals; that he divulged his idea to employees of the defendant who wrongfully appropriated it; that foreign and domestic patents thereon were issued to defendant’s employees and assigned to the defendant. He seeks a decree declaring the defendant a trustee ex maleficio of these patents and enjoining their exploitation by the defend

. The defendant denied that the plaintiff made any disclosure to its employees and averred as an additional defense that the basic idea of the application of the principies of rectification to metals was not novel at the time of the alleged disclosure by the plaintiff.

The trial court in its opinion pointed out that the testimony as to the alleged disclosures by the plaintiff was conflicting and it found that the plaintiff’s alleged disclosure was insufficient to enable the defendant to appropriate and practice his idea. As we have frequently stated, the findings of a tribunal charged with the duty of determining the facts are not to be disturbed if supported by substantial evidence. Canfield v. Blaw-Knox Co., 3 Cir., 98 F.2d 805; Frank *v.*Atwood, 3 Cir., 75 F.2d 918; Gill v. Benjamin Franklin Realty & Holding Co., *3*Cir., 43 F.2d 337; Wald v. Longacre, 3 *Cir., 34*F.2d 25; Hazelwood Brewing Co. v. United States, 3 Cir., 3 F.2d 721

The evidence also fully supports the finding of the District Court that at the time °i the alleged disclosure the plaintiff’s idea was not novel. Consequently, even if he had succeeded in convincing the triai CQUrt ^ he had disclosed his idea t0 thc dcfendant>s empioyeeS; he stm failed to sustain the burden upon him of proving that the idea was novel. This it was necessary for him to do in order to impose an implied agreement upon the defendant to refrain from its use.

The decree of the court below is affirmed.
# C_2008107EN.01003702.xml

| 26.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/37

---

Action brought on 20 February 2008 — KUKA Roboter v OHIM (colour mark orange)

(Case T-97/08)

(2008/C 107/63)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: KUKA Roboter GmbH (Augsburg, Germany) (represented by A. Kohn, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 14 December 2007 in Case R 1572/2007-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 14 December 2007 in Case R 1572/2007-4;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The contourless colour mark orange for goods in Class 7 (Application No 4 607 801)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

| — | Infringement of Article 28 EC as the contested decision constitutes a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on imports |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 28 EC as the contested decision constitutes a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on imports

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), as the mark applied for has distinctive character |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), as the mark applied for has distinctive character

1

| — | Infringement of Articles 73 and 74 of Regulation No 40/94 as there is no or an insufficient statement of reasons for the contested decision and the facts have not been examined sufficiently |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 73 and 74 of Regulation No 40/94 as there is no or an insufficient statement of reasons for the contested decision and the facts have not been examined sufficiently

| — | Misuse of powers as the defendant took extraneous considerations into account in its statement of reasons for the contested decision in respect of the requirement of availability. |
| --- | --- |

—

Misuse of powers as the defendant took extraneous considerations into account in its statement of reasons for the contested decision in respect of the requirement of availability.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-20100 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. HECTOR ESPARZA ALVAREZ, also known as Hector Esparza, also known as Hecleto Perales Esparza, also known as Hector Alvarez Esparza, also known as Hector Esparza-Alvarez, also known as Alverez Hector Esparza, also known as Lionel Sauceda, also known as Hector Alverez Esparza, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-602-1
Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal P u b lic Defender appointed to represent Hector Esparza Alvarez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Esparza Alvarez has filed a response, in which he requests appointment of cou n s e l , and a supplemental response, which we have U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Octob er 21 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-20100 Document: 00511640278 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011No. 10-20100

considered. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portio n s of the record reflected therein, as well as Esparza Alvarez’s response. We concur with counsel’s a s s e s s m e nt th at th e a p peal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

c o u n s e l i s e xc u s e d f

r o m further responsibilities herein, Esparza Alvarez ’ s m o ti o n to supplement his response is GRANTED, his motions for app o intment of counsel and for judicial notice are DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 10-20100 Document: 00511640278 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
# FILED August 17, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE ED FRAZIER, ) C/A NO. 03A01-9804-CV-00128 ) Plaintiff-A ppellant, ) COCK E CIRC UIT ) v. ) HON. REX HENRY OGLE, ) JUDGE COCKE COUNTY BEER BOARD, ) WILLIAM HAL CUTSHAW, AND ) JOHNNIE ARTHUR ST YLES, ) d/b/a AMOCO EXPRESS, ) AFFIRMED ) AND Defendants-Appellees. ) REMANDED

JOHN B. BU NNE LL, Ne wport, fo r Plaintiff-A ppellant. CLYDE A. DUNN , Newport, for Defendants-Appellees.

O P I N I

O N Franks, J.
Plaintiff filed his comp laint as “Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Granting Package and Beer Sales License” on June 16, 1997,and charged “that defenda nt Cocke County Be er Board improper ly granted a pa ckage be er permit to defendants . . .on or about October 7, 1996, in Newport, Cocke County,Tennessee, contrary to Te nnessee C ode An notated §5 7-5-105(b )(1).” Resp onding to a Motion to Dismiss, the Trial Judge held:

The petition for

certiorar i filed by the plainti

ff was not filed withi

n the sixty day time period prescribed by T.C.A. § 27-9-102 , and, further , it appearing to the Cou rt that the perm itees no long er have a b eer permit issued by Cocke County , Tennessee, but, to the contrar

y, have a beer permit is sued f rom the City of N ewpo rt, the issu es are re ndered moot. Acco rdingly, the comp laint is dis missed
. . . . The Be er Board ’s actions are judicially review ed by a statutory w rit of certiorari,2

which is “the sole remedy and exclusi ve method of review of any act ion or order. .. .” T.C.A. § 57-5-108 and 109 . The proc edure for th is right of rev iew is estab lished in T.C.A. §27-9-101 et seq., and T.C.A. §27-9-102 provide s in pertine nt part that petitioner

“shall, wit

hin sixty (60) days fr

om the entry of t

he order or judgment,

file a petition of certio rari in the Chan cery Cou rt . . . .”

The com plaint show s on its face th at the petition w as not filed w ithin sixty days of the Board’s order, and as we said in Thandiwe v. Traughber , 909 S.W.2d 802, 804 (Tenn . App. 1994):

The time limits

apply to bot

h the common law and statutor y writs of certiora ri. Fairbanks Corp. , 566 S.W .2d at 886. T he failure to f ile within the st

atutory t ime limits r

esults in t

he Board’s decision be

coming final, and on ce the decis ion has be come fin al, the Chan cery Court is deprived o f jurisdiction; Wheeler v . City of Me mphis , 685 S .W.2d 4, 6 (Tenn. A pp. 1984 ); Fairhaven Corp. v. Tenn. Health Fac. Com’n. , 566 S.W.2d at 887. We affirm the judgment of the Tr ial Court in hol

ding that it

did not have jurisdict ion in this c ase because the pet ition was not t

imely fil ed, pursuant t

o statute. The judgment of the Trial Court is affir

med with the cost of t

he appeal assessed to plaintiff,and the cause remanded.

__________________________ Herschel P. Franks, J. CONCUR:

___________________________ Don T. McM urray, J.

___________________________ Charles D. Susano, Jr., J.
EXHIBIT 32.02***CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER***     I, Theresa D. Becks, the Chief Financial Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc. as generalpartner, of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P., certify that (i) the Form 10K for the yearended December 31, 2005 of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P. fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) theinformation contained in the Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2005 fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Campbell StrategicAllocation Fund, L.P.         CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P.    By: Campbell & Company, Inc., general partner           By: /s/ Theresa D. Becks Theresa D. Becks      Chief Financial Officer      March 31, 2006  
E 5
1845-0084 v4 – Affected Public – For-Profit Institutions 11/7/2014

The regulations in 686.4 require an institution that ceases to participate or becomes ineligible to 

participate in the TEACH Grant program during an award year to report to the Department of 

Education within 45 days after the effective date of the loss of eligibility. The report must 

include the name of each TEACH Grant eligible student, the amount of the TEACH Grant funds 

paid to each student for that award year, and the amount of TEACH Grant funds due each 

eligible student through the end of the payment period. Also, the institution must provide an 

accounting of all TEACH Grant expenditures for that award year to the date of termination.

 # of # of Total

Respondents Responses hours

Business or other for-profits 1 1 9

The regulations in 686.11 establish that in addition to meeting the student eligibility

requirements, in order to receive a TEACH Grant the applicant must submit the designated 

application, sign a TEACH Grant agreement to serve (this burden is captured under OMB

Control Number 1845-0083), and enroll in a TEACH Grant eligible institution. In addition, the 

grant recipient must either maintain a cumulative grade point average of 3.25 on a 4.0 scale 

during each payment period or score above the 75th percentile on at least one of the battery of 

nationally- normed standardized test.

 # of # of Total

Respondents Responses hours

Business or other for-profits 10 2,090 128

The regulations in 686.32 require an institution to provide initial, subsequent, and exit counseling 

to each TEACH Grant recipient and maintain documentation substantiating the counseling 

requirements. 

 # of # of Total

Respondents Responses hours

Business or other for-profits 10 10 138

The regulations in 686.34 require the institution to promptly provide written notification to a 

student requesting repayment of any overpayment that the institution does not have responsibility 

to repay. The regulations also require that the institution refer the student to the Department if 

the student does not take positive action to promptly resolve the TEACH Grant overpayment.

 # of # of Total

Respondents Responses hours

Business or other for-profits 10 10 3

TOTALS

Responses 2,111

Respondents 10

Burden Hours 278