IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

JOHN CARR, No. 60318 

Appellant, 

vs. 

GUSTAVO PARED ES; AND KAYLA D. 

PAREDES, 

Respondents. 

JOHN CARR, No. 61301 

Appellant, 

vs. 

GUSTAVO PAREDES; AND KAYLA D. 

PAREDES, 

Respondents. 

JOHN CARR, No. 68518 v"- 

Appellant, 

vs. 

GUSTAVO PARED ES; AND KAYLA D. 

PAREDES, 

Respondents. 

FILED 

APR 1 3 2016 

TRACE K. LINDEMAN 

COURT nly:LERI<DIFFIRC 

On February 10, 2014, this court entered a non - dispositional 

order in Docket Nos. 60318 and 61301, remanding the matter to the 

district court to make specific findings with regard to a motion for a new 

trial based on attorney misconduct. The order contemplated that the court 

would consider the other issues raised on appeal, as well as the amended 

order regarding the denial of the motion for a new trial, once the amended 

order was entered. Despite the non -dispositional nature of the order, the 

remittitur issued on March 7, 2014, due to a clerical error. On July 30, 

2015, appellant filed a notice of appeal from the amended order entered 

upon remand as well as an order challenged in the original appeal. That 

appeal was docketed separately as Docket No. 68518. 

ORDER 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 
It is so ORDERED. 

01...artra , C. J. 

ost10:43.4r4Thit 

We direct the clerk to recall the remittitur in Docket Nos. 

60318 and 61301 and reinstate those consolidated appeals. The clerk 

shall also administratively close the appeal in Docket No. 68518 and 

transfer to Docket Nos. 60318 and 61301 all documents filed in Docket No. 

68518. 

Respondent has filed a motion to strike portions of the opening 

brief filed in Docket No. 68518. Having considered the motion, opposition, 

and reply, we grant the motion to the following extent. The clerk shall 

strike the opening brief filed on December 30, 2015, in Docket No. 68518. 

Appellant shall have 20 days from the date of this order to file and serve 

an amended opening brief that is identical to the opening brief filed on 

November 1, 2012, in Docket Nos. 60318 and 61301 with the following 

exceptions. Appellant may alter the citations to correspond with the page 

numbers in the appendix filed on December 30, 2015, in Docket No. 68518, 

and may include additional factual and procedural history and argument 

solely insofar as they relate to the amended district court order denying 

the motion for a new trial. Should appellant wish to present supplemental 

authorities not included in the original opening brief, he may advise the 

court of such authorities by filing a notice of supplemental authorities as 

provided in NRAP 31(e). Respondents may file an amended answering 

brief within 20 days of service of appellant's amended opening brief. 

Thereafter, appellant shall have 20 days to file and serve an amended 

reply brief. The amended answering and reply briefs are subject to the 

same restrictions discussed above with respect to the amended opening 

brief. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 
gi,..alENZEISEVEIEEM ZEMKE 

cc: Hon. Kerry Louise Earley, District Judge 

Phillip Aurbach, Settlement Judge 

Keating Law Group 

Pyatt Silvestri 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

3