alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12300]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Klimt Landscapes” at the Neue Galerie New York, in New York, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2024-00101 Filed 1-5-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4954 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4954

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require members of the Armed 
 Forces to receive additional training under the Transition Assistance 
                    Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2018

 Mrs. Murphy of Florida (for herself, Mr. Bergman, Ms. Sinema, and Mr. 
 Curbelo of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to require members of the Armed 
 Forces to receive additional training under the Transition Assistance 
                    Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Better Access to Technical Training, 
Learning, and Entrepreneurship for Servicemembers Act'' or the ``BATTLE 
for Servicemembers Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRED TRAINING; WAIVERS.

    Section 1144(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``Opportunities'';
            (2) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by inserting ``and subject to paragraph (2)'' 
                after ``section'';
                    (B) by striking ``the Secretary of Defense'' and 
                all that follows through ``shall permit''; and
                    (C) by striking ``to elect to'' and inserting 
                ``shall''; and
            (3) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following 
        new paragraph:
    ``(2) The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland 
Security shall, under regulations such Secretaries shall prescribe, 
waive the additional training under paragraph (1) for:
            ``(A) Such groups or classifications of members as the 
        Secretaries determine, after consultation with the Secretary of 
        Labor and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, for whom 
        participation is not and would not be of assistance to such 
        members based on the articulable justification of the 
        Secretaries that there is extraordinarily high reason to 
        believe the exempted members are unlikely to face major 
        readjustment, health care, employment, or other challenges 
        associated with transition to civilian life.
            ``(B) A member possessing specialized skills who, due to 
        unavoidable circumstances, is needed to support the imminent 
        deployment of a unit.
            ``(C) A member who elects in writing not to receive such 
        additional training.''.
                                 <all>
```
9606 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2024 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

20 CFR Chs. I, IV, V, VI, VII, and IX 

29 CFR Subtitle A and Chs. II, IV, V, 

XVII, and XXV 

30 CFR Ch. I 

41 CFR Ch. 60 

48 CFR Ch. 29 

Semiannual Agenda of Regulations 

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Labor. 

ACTION: Semiannual Regulatory Agenda. 

SUMMARY: The internet has become the 

means for disseminating the entirety of 

the Department of Labor’s semiannual 

regulatory agenda. However, the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act requires 

publication of a regulatory flexibility 

agenda in the Federal Register. This 

Federal Register Notice contains the 

regulatory flexibility agenda. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Albert T. Herrera, Director, Office of 

Regulatory and Programmatic Policy, 

Office of the Assistant Secretary for 

Policy, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 

Constitution Avenue NW, Room S– 

2312, Washington, DC 20210; (202) 693– 

5959. 

Note: Information pertaining to a specific 

regulation can be obtained from the agency 

contact listed for that particular regulation. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Executive 

Order 12866 requires the semiannual 

publication of an agenda of regulations 

that contains a listing of all the 

regulations the Department of Labor 

expects to have under active 

consideration for promulgation, 

proposal, or review during the coming 

one-year period. The entirety of the 

Department’s semiannual agenda is 

available online at www.reginfo.gov. 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 602) requires DOL to publish in 

the Federal Register a regulatory 

flexibility agenda. The Department’s 

Regulatory Flexibility Agenda, 

published with this notice, includes 

only those rules on its semiannual 

agenda that are likely to have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities; 

and those rules identified for periodic 

review in keeping with the requirements 

of section 610 of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. Thus, the regulatory 

flexibility agenda is a subset of the 

Department’s semiannual regulatory 

agenda. The Department’s Regulatory 

Flexibility Agenda does not include 

section 610 items at this time. 

All interested members of the public 

are invited and encouraged to let 

departmental officials know how our 

regulatory efforts can be improved and 

are invited to participate in and 

comment on the review or development 

of the regulations listed on the 

Department’s agenda. 

Julie A. Su, 

Acting Secretary of Labor. 

[FR Doc. 2024–00455 Filed 2–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS12
Order filed November 30 , 202 1



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________ No s . 11

- 2 1

- 00 145

- C R & 11

- 21

- 00200

- CR

__________ DANIEL RAY GARCIA , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 106th District Court Gaines County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 19

- 5086 & 16

- 4669

O R D E R
Before th is court is a pro se motion related to the clerk’s records and the reporter’s records that were filed in these causes. We note that Appellant filed the
motion in each cause on November 1, 2021 , before most of the records were even
due to be filed in this court. The records filed in this court have now been provided

to Appellant by the district clerk and the court reporter. Therefore, Appellant’s motion is moot in this regard.2 Appellant also complains of omissions from the clerk’s record in Cause
No. 11

- 21

- 00200

- CR (trial court cause no. 16

- 4669). Appellant asserts that the
dis trict clerk is required “ to send all documents

. ” Appellant is incorrect. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that, u nless otherwise specifically designated by a party, a clerk’s record in a criminal appeal shall , if applicable,
include the fol lowing documents : the indictment or information, any special plea or defense motion that was presented to the court and overruled, any written waiver or stipulation, any plea documents, the court’s docket sheet, the jury charge and verdict, findings of fac t and conclusions of law, the judgment or order that is being appealed, a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, post

- judgment motions and any rulings thereon, the notice of appeal, a ny bill of exception, the certification of Appellant’s righ t of appeal, and any request for the preparation of the reporter’s
record and the clerk’s record. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 34.5(a). Here, t he clerk of the district court certified that “all of the documents specified by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(a) and all other documents timely request ed by a party to this proceeding under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(b) ” were included in the clerk’s record. Appellant did not file a designation of record with the trial court clerk identifying specific , ad ditional items
to be included in the clerk’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5(a)(13), ( b )

. Furthermore, w e note that some of the omissions about which Appellant complains
in his motion , such as police statements and witness statements, were likely not even
filed with the district clerk. Based on our review of the clerk’s record, it does not appear that the clerk’s record is defective or inaccurate; therefore, we deny Appellant’s reques t to supplement or correct the record. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P

. 34.5(c), (d).3 Next, Appellant complains about the form of the reporter’s record and the color of the district clerk’s file stamp. These complaints are without merit. Accordingly, w e deny Appella nt’s motion in part and dismiss the motion in part as moot.

PER CURIAM

November 30 , 202 1 Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trott er, J., and Williams, J.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.59

                      SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION FOR DIRECTORS
                           OF R. G. BARRY CORPORATION

      Directors who are employees of R. G. Barry Corporation ("R. G. Barry")
receive no additional compensation for their service as a director. Each
director of R. G. Barry who is not an employee of R. G. Barry (a "Non-Employee
Director") receives $17,000 annually for services as a director. In addition,
each Non-Employee Director receives $1,000 for each regular meeting and $500 for
each telephonic meeting of the Board of Directors attended. All members of
standing committees of the Board receive a fee of $500 for each committee
meeting attended that occurs on the same day as a Board meeting, a fee of $1,000
for attending a committee meeting that does not occur on the same day as a Board
meeting and a fee of $500 for participating in a telephonic meeting of a
committee. Chairs of Board committees may receive additional fees for serving in
that capacity; however, none of the Board committee chairs are currently
receiving additional fees.

      Each Non-Employee Director has previously been granted a non-qualified
stock option to purchase 6,250 common shares with an exercise price equal to the
fair market value of the common shares on the grant date. These options have
terms of ten years and become exercisable six months after the grant date. All
options held by current Non-Employee Directors, other than Mr. Lauer, were
granted pursuant to the R. G. Barry Corporation Stock Option Plan for
No-Employee Directors which terminated on May 16, 2001. Mr. Lauer's
non-qualified stock option was granted under the R. G. Barry Corporation 2002
Stock Incentive Plan (the "2002 Plan"). On March 7, 2005, each Non-Employee
Director was granted an additional non-qualified stock option to purchase 10,000
common shares at an exercise price of $3.80, the fair market value of the
Company's common shares on the grant date. These options have terms of five
years and become exercisable in three equal annual installments beginning March
7, 2006. All of these options were granted under the 2002 Plan.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Blast Energy Services, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David M. Adams, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating
Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 11, 2005



By:

/s/ David M. AdamsDavid M. AdamsCo - Chief Executive OfficerChief Operating OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer
# C_2009032EN.01004201.xml

| 7.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/42

---

Action brought on 14 November 2008 — Ryanair/Commission

(Case T-497/08)

(2009/C 32/81)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ryanair Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, I. Metaxas-Maragkidis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare in accordance with Articles 230 and 231 EC that the Commission's implied decision refusing access to the documents for which access was requested by the applicant in an application dated 25 June 2008 is void; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare in accordance with Articles 230 and 231 EC that the Commission's implied decision refusing access to the documents for which access was requested by the applicant in an application dated 25 June 2008 is void;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings; and |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings; and

| — | take such further action as the Court may deem appropriate. |
| --- | --- |

—

take such further action as the Court may deem appropriate.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By means of this application the applicant seeks annulment of the Commission implied decision rejecting the applicant's request, pursuant to Regulation No 1049/2001 (1), of the access to documents relating to State aid procedures concerning the presumed State aid granted through an agreement with the operator of Frankfurt Hahn airport.

1

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicant are similar to those relied on in Case T-494/08 Ryanair v Commission.

Ryanair

Commission

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43.

1

---
Map Created: March 2012

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2009

Relative Per Capita Income Rates in Appalachia, 2009

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

Per capita income is a measure of the total personal income of 

an area divided by the resident population of the area. The 

percent of the U.S. average is computed by dividing the county 

per capita income by the national average and multiplying by 

100. The map uses critical breaks such as the national average 

to organize the data into groups of common values.

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

39.1% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.9%

100.0% - 117.1%

Percent of the U.S. Average 

U.S. average = $39,635

Appalachian average = $32,426

(Critical Breaks Classification)
Summary of Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 Strategic Hotel Capital, Inc. 
 Director Compensation 
  

							
	 	  	Cash

	  	RSUs


	 Annual Retainer
	  	$	25,000	  	 	 
	 Annual Award
	  	 	 	  	$	40,000
			
	 Chairman of the Board
	  	$	20,000	  	 	 
	 Chairman of the Audit Committee
	  	$	12,000	  	 	 
	 Chairman of Nominating/Governance Committee
	  	$	8,000	  	 	 
	 Chairman of Compensation Committee
	  	$	8,000	  	 	 
			
	 Board Meeting Fee ($1,500/meeting)
	  	$	1,500	  	 	 
	 Committee Meeting Fee ($1,500/meeting)
	  	$	1,500	  	 	 

  

 3
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6162]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1210
                              WSU SALUTES

  (Mr. BISHOP of Utah asked and was given permission to address the 
House for 1 minute.)
  Mr. BISHOP of Utah. Mr. Speaker, Weber State University is honoring 
people, and I wish to mention four individuals who are being honored by 
the university.
  State Representative Gage Froerer and State Senator Scott Jenkins 
will be receiving the Shurtliff Award for contributions to education. 
Both of them have done much for their particular communities, as well 
as Weber State and their outreach campus in Davis County.
  Receiving the prestigious President's Award will be Nolan Karras, a 
cum laude graduate from Weber State who also served as speaker of the 
house in Utah and was instrumental in Weber State attaining the status 
of university level.
  In addition to that, he has benefited the community as well as the 
education system in Utah ever since by being on the board of regents in 
Utah.
  The second nominee will also be one who has been called one of the 
brightest minds in Utah politics, Spencer Stokes, a 1995 graduate from 
Weber State who has done much in his community as the commissioner as 
well as an advocate, and who's also, I have to admit, gone over to the 
dark side and is a staffer for the Senate right now as the chief of 
staff for a Utah Senator, but we will forgive him for that.
  These four individuals have done much for the community, done much 
for their common county, Weber County, and the State of Utah, and are 
really deserving, very deserving of these honors they are being given 
by Weber State University today, and I wish to honor them as well.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 13.A

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Canadian Zinc Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I,  John F. Kearney, President and Chief Executive Officer of Canadian Zinc Corporation hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



1.

The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.

The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



Date: June 30, 2005



/s/ John F. Kearney

President and Chief Executive Officer
# Metcalfe - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Barren River Area Development District Executive Director Eric Sexton Email &#101;r&#105;c&#46;s&#x65;x&#x74;o&#x6e;&#64;&#x62;r&#x61;d&#x64;&#46;&#x6f;r&#x67;The post Barren River Area Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6163]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1220
                              GUN CONTROL

  (Mr. BISHOP of New York asked and was given permission to address the 
House for 1 minute.)
  Mr. BISHOP of New York. Mr. Speaker, I rise to commemorate the tragic 
passing of Neil Godleski, nephew of my friend and constituent, Suzanne 
Murphy of Southampton, New York.
  Neil was a rising senior at Catholic University. He was fatally shot 
on August 22, 2010, while riding his bicycle home from a restaurant 
where he worked as a waiter. He was 31 years old and had returned to 
college with plans to pursue a career in science. His assailant was a 
16-year-old boy who shot him six times with a .38 caliber handgun and 
then robbed him.
  Suzanne's family has been wrenched with grief over the sudden end of 
this young man's life. While no vigil or memorial could ever begin to 
take away the pain of this loss, Suzanne has found a way to channel her 
grief and focus her energy. She has become an advocate for gun control.
  When roughly 100,000 Americans are killed or wounded each year, 
reasonable people can agree that we can achieve evenhanded policies 
that protect Americans from senseless gun violence that do not infringe 
on any American's right to possess a firearm.
  Mr. Speaker, I applaud Suzanne's efforts to reach out and bring 
awareness to the problem of gun safety. We must not let her nephew 
become just another chilling statistic in the battle to make our 
community safer, leaving another family struggling to get past the pain 
and the loss.

                          ____________________
```