### Instructions for filling in the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate runs or sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in green are populated using drop

- down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet. 2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg Hg +2 

### , or if the Ontario

- Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg 0

### , HgP, and Hg Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi

-Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions follow for these worksheets:

Boiler Operation Information

1. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of test run/sample. 2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

Fuel Information

1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop

- downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero. 2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided. 3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate. 4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

Emission Data

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and ppmvd @ 7% O 2 

### (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please also enter these data.

### This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. Fields shaded in down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet.

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg 0 

### and , HgP, and Hg +2 

### . However, both the Speciated Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

- down provided in the Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions

2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples,

4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and

(parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please alsoEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

55479 WYGEN I 3Control Device ConfiguratonEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 55479 WYGEN I 3

1 7/15/2010 8:27 7/15/2010 2 7/15/2010 10:48 7/15/2010 3 7/15/2010 13:13 7/15/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DLL) 10:27 0.66 Wet U.S. EPA Method 320 ADL 12:48 0.14 Wet U.S. EPA Method 320 ADL 15:13 0.76 Wet U.S. EPA Method 320 ADL Test End Time Formaldehyde Emission Test ResultsTest Method

Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2 0.00076 0.66 730.1620572 1041 0.00016 0.14 733.7365655 1043.6 0.00086 0.75 733.1462925 1062.5 Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input

(mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure 17.2 15.3 4.2 206128 177 3022.743692 subbituminous ton/day 18.1 15.6 4.2 205181 183 3021.933523 subbituminous ton/day 16.2 15.5 4.1 207216 187 3021.123353 subbituminous ton/day Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas

CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%)Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Other Other Other Fuel #2 Fuel #3Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Other Supporting Information Fuel #4EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 55479 WYGEN I 3

1 6/30/2010 6:44 2 6/30/2010 12:36 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Me asured Value (μg/dscm) Basis (Wet or Dry)

6/30/2010 8:44 5.68 Dry 6/30/2010 14:36 5.87 Dry

Test End Time Test End Date Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsPlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DLL) Test Method

Comments (lb/mmBtu)

U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 4.26E-06 781 U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 4.38E-06 800 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsFuel Input Rate

1056.6 15.1 15.5 3.8 238050 184 2990.4 1079.9 17.3 15.7 3.7 223103 186 2988 Flue Gas Moisture (%) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate
subbituminous

ton/day Other subbituminous

ton/day Other Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #3 Fuel #4QA /QC Documentation

Trap ID Section 1

Mass (ng) Section 2

Mass (ng) Total

Mass (ng) Initial

Spike (ng) Total NonSpike (ng)
18546 199.1 0.6 199.7 100 99.7 18557 219.5 0.8 220.3 100 120.3 Other Supporting InformationSample

Volume (dscm) Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough

(%) Breaktrough

Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Trap ID

0.020174 0.00% 0.301356102 4.94200456 FGS01576 0.019669 2.50% 0.364464692 6.116223499 FGS01806 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ≤ 20% of field recovery test ≤10% of Section 1 Hg

ma ss for Hg conc. >1
μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section Trap #1Section 1

Mass Section 2

Mass Total

Mass Initial

Spike Total NonSpike Sample

Volume Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit
112.5 0.5 113 0 113 0.02032 0.00% 110.7 0.5 111.2 0 111.2 0.019745 2.90%
≤ 20% of field recovery test Trap #2Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Ab s. diff. RD (%) Limit C rec

0.444444444 5.561023622 0.619019 5.89372 104.7 0.451671183 5.63180552 0.484418 4.123398 109.2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ≥ 10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1 μg/dscm: or
≤ 20% RD or ≤ 0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff. for Hg conc. ≤1 ≤10% of Section 1 Hg mass for Hg conc. >1
μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section 1 for Hg conc. ≤1 Me asured Spike Recovery ( R ) Paired Trap Agreement (RD)R (%) by

Run Ravg(%) Limit

104.7 109.2 Average Recovery

, between 85 and 115% Me asured Spike Recovery ( R )

106.95EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

55479 WYGEN I 3

1 6/30/2010 9:43 6/30/2010 2 6/30/2010 15:35 6/30/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used
10:43 0.059 Dry U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033) 16:35 0.049 Dry U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033) Hydrogen Cyanide Emission Test Results Test End TimeData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DLL) Test Method

Comments BDL 0.00005 781 1082.1 15.1 15.5 BDL 0.000041 800 1089.1 17.3 15.7 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate 3.8 238050 184 2988 subbituminous ton/day Other 3.7 223.103 186 2990.4 subbituminous ton/day Other Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

55479 WYGEN I 3

1 6/30/2010 9:43 6/30/2010 2 6/30/2010 15:35 6/30/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used
15:35 0.158 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26 16:35 0.114 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26 Test End Time Hydrogen Chloride Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DLL) Test Method

Comments BDL 0.000179 781 1082.1 15.1 15.5 BDL 0.000128 800 1089.1 17.3 15.7 Hydrogen Chloride Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate 3.8 238050 184 2988 subbituminous ton/day Other 3.7 223103 186 2990.4 subbituminous ton/day Other Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas O 2(%)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

55479 WYGEN I 3

1 6/30/2010 9:43 6/30/2010 2 6/30/2010 15:35 6/30/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used
15:35 0.717 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26 16:35 0.519 Dry U.S. EPA Method 26 Hydrogen Flouride Emission Test Results Test End TimeData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DLL) Test Method

Comments BDL 0.000447 781 1082.1 15.1 BDL 0.000321 800 1089.1 17.3 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Hydrogen Flouride Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method 15.5 3.8 238050 184 2988 subbituminous ton/day Other 15.7 3.7 223103 186 2990.4 subbituminous ton/day Other Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm)Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 55479 WYGEN I 3

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeTotal Dissolved Solids (mg solids/liter) Total Suspended Solids (mg solids/liter) Test End Time Test End DateTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DLL) Constisuent Emission Test ResultsTest Method Comments Fuel Input Rate Flue Gas Temperat ure (F) Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input

(mmBtu/hr)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #3 Fuel #4Other Supporting Information