1882 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 8 / Thursday, January 11, 2024 / Notices 

1See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-toLength Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany: 

Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 

Value, 82 FR 16360 (April 4, 2017) (Final 

Determination). 

2See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-toLength Plate from Austria, Belgium, France, the 

Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Japan, the 

Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for 

France, the Federal Republic of Germany, the 

Republic of Korea and Taiwan, and Antidumping 

Duty Orders, 82 FR 24096 (May 25, 2017) 

(Amended Final Determination). 

3See AG der Dillinger Hu ̈ ttenwerke v. United 

States, 399 F. Supp. 3d 1247 (CIT 2019) (Dillinger 

Germany I). 

4See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Court Remand, Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel 

Cut-to-Length Plate from Germany, Court No. 17– 

00158, Slip Op. 19–87 (CIT July 16, 2019), dated 

October 8, 2019, available at https://access.trade.

gov/resources/remands/index.html. 

5See AG der Dillinger Hu ̈ ttenwerke v. United 

States, 534 F. Supp. 3d 1403 (CIT 2021) (Dillinger 

Germany II). 

6See Memorandum and Order, ECF No. 121 

(August 18, 2021). 

7See AG der Dillinger Hu ̈ ttenwerke v. United 

States, 592 F. Supp. 3d 1344 (CIT 2022) (Dillinger 

Germany III). 

• Securitas Critical Infrastructure 

Services, Inc.; Herndon, VA 

• Shift5; Rosslyn, VA 

• SI2 Technologies; North Billerica, MA 

• Siemens Government Technologies, 

Inc.; Reston, VA 

• Sierra Nevada Corporation; Sparks, 

NV 

• SkyThread Corporation; Irvine, CA 

• Slingshot Aerospace, Inc.; Austin, TX 

• Solvay; Alpharetta, GA 

• Spartronics LLC; Williamsport, PA 

• Special Aerospace Services, LLC; 

Boulder, CO 

• Spirit AeroSystems; Wichita, KS 

• Spright; Gilbert, AZ 

• Stratolaunch LLC; Mojave, CA 

• Supernal LLC; Washington, DC 

• SupplyOn North America, Inc.; Greer, 

SC 

• Synergetic Technologies Group, Inc.; 

La Verne, CA 

• Tata Consultancy Services; Edison, NJ 

• Textron Inc.; Providence, RI 

• The Aerospace Corporation, Civil 

Systems Group; El Segundo, CA 

• The Boeing Company; Chicago, IL 

• The Haskell Company; Jacksonville, 

FL 

• The Lundquist Group LLC; New York, 

NY 

• The Padina Group, Inc.; Lancaster, PA 

• Therm, Incorporated; Ithaca, NY 

• TransDigm Group, Inc.; Cleveland, 

OH 

• Tribus Aerospace Corporation; 

Poway, CA 

• TriMas Aerospace; Irvine, CA 

• Triumph Group, Inc.; Berwyn, PA 

• True Anomaly; Centennial, CO 

• TTM Technologies Inc.; Santa Ana, 

CA 

• Umbra Lab, Inc.; Santa Barbara, CA 

• Unitech Composites Inc.; Hayden, ID 

• United Launch Alliance; Centennial, 

CO 

• Ursa Major Technologies, Inc.; 

Berthoud, CO 

• Verify, Inc.; Costa Mesa, CA 

• VIASAT, INC.; Carlsbad, CA 

• Virgin Galactic, LLC; Las Cruces, NM 

• Weldaloy Specialty Forgings; Warren, 

MI 

• Westinghouse Electric Company LLC; 

Cranberry Township, PA 

• Wisk Aero LLC; Mountain View, CA 

• Woodward, Inc.; Fort Collins, CO 

• World View Enterprises, Inc.; Tucson, 

AZ 

Dated: January 5, 2024. 

Joseph Flynn, 

Director, Office of Trade and Economic 

Analysis, International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

[FR Doc. 2024–00367 Filed 1–10–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–428–844] 

Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-toLength Plate From the Federal 

Republic of Germany: Notice of Court 

Decision Not in Harmony With the 

Amended Final Determination of 

Antidumping Investigation; Notice of 

Second Amended Final Determination 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 21, 2023, the 

U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) 

issued its final judgment in AG der 

Dillinger Hu ̈ ttenwerke v. United States, 

Court No. 17–00158, sustaining the U.S. 

Department of Commerce’s (Commerce) 

fourth final results of redetermination 

pertaining to the antidumping duty (AD) 

investigation of certain carbon and alloy 

steel cut-to-length plate (CTL plate) 

from the Federal Republic of Germany 

(Germany) covering the period April 1, 

2015, through March 31, 2016. 

Commerce is notifying the public that 

the CIT’s final judgment is not in 

harmony with Commerce’s amended 

final determination and Commerce is 

amending the amended final 

determination with respect to the 

dumping margins assigned to AG Der 

Dillinger Hu ̈ttenwerke (Dillinger) and 

all other producers and exporters of 

subject merchandise. 

DATES: Applicable December 31, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Adam Simons, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6172. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 4, 2017, Commerce 

published its final determination in the 

AD investigation of CTL plate from 

Germany.1 After correcting ministerial 

errors in the Final Determination, on 

May 25, 2017, Commerce published the 

Amended Final Determination, 

calculating estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins of: 5.52 percent for 

Dillinger; 22.90 percent for Ilsenburger 

Grobblech GmbH, Salzgitter 

Mannesmann Grobblech GmbH, 

Salzgitter Flachstahl GmbH, and 

Salzgitter Mannesmann International 

GmbH (collectively, Salzgitter); and 

21.04 percent for all other producers 

and exporters.2 In this same notice, 

Commerce published its AD order on 

CTL plate from Germany. 

Dillinger and Salzgitter appealed 

Commerce’s Amended Final 

Determination. On July 16, 2019, the 

CIT remanded to Commerce to 

reconsider its application of partial 

adverse facts available (AFA) to certain 

downstream home market sales reported 

by Dillinger.3 Pursuant to Dillinger 

Germany I, Commerce reconsidered 

how it applied partial AFA to these 

sales.4

On August 18, 2021, in Dillinger 

Germany II, the CIT remanded to 

Commerce to consider its reallocation of 

costs between prime and non-prime 

steel plate for Dillinger, among other 

Dillinger cost issues, as well as the 

application of a partial AFA 

methodology to certain downstream 

home market sales reported by 

Salzgitter.5 In parallel with Dillinger 

Germany II, the CIT issued a separate 

memorandum and order sustaining 

Commerce’s rejection of Dillinger’s 

proposed quality code for sour service 

pressure vessel plate and staying 

Dillinger’s challenge to Commerce’s 

rejection of the proposed quality code 

for sour service petroleum transport 

plate pending the outcome of the cost 

issues on remand.6

On September 23, 2022, in Dillinger 

Germany III, the CIT remanded to 

Commerce to again reconsider its 

selection of the facts otherwise available 

for determining the cost of production 

of Dillinger’s non-prime products.7 On 

June 23, 2023, in Dillinger Germany IV, 

the CIT sustained Commerce’s 

determination to assign the ‘‘likely 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 8 / Thursday, January 11, 2024 / Notices 1883 

8See AG der Dillinger Hu ̈ ttenwerke v. United 

States, Court No. 17–00158, Slip Op. 23–94 (CIT 

2023) (Dillinger Germany IV). 9See Dillinger Germany IV, Court No. 17–00158, 

Slip Op. 23–94 at 4 and 25; see also Bohler Bleche 

GMBH & Co. KG v. United States, 324 F. Supp. 3d 

1344 (CIT 2018) (Bohler). 10See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Court Remand; Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel 

Cut-to-Length Plate from Germany, Court No. 17– 

00158, Slip Op. 23–94 (CIT June 23, 2023), dated 

September 6, 2023, available at https://

access.trade.gov/resources/remands/index.html. 

11See AG Der Dillinger Hu ̈ ttenwerke, v. United 

States, Court No. 17–00158, Slip Op. 23–187 (CIT 

2023). 

12See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Court Remand; Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel 

Cut-to-Length Plate from Germany, Court No. 17– 

00158, Slip. Op. 21–101 (CIT August 18, 2021), 

dated January 19, 2022 (Second Remand 

Redetermination), available at https://

access.trade.gov/resources/remands/index.html. As 

a result of this redetermination, Commerce 

reinstated the dumping margin for Salzgitter of 

22.90 percent calculated in the Amended Final 

Determination. 

13See Dillinger Germany III. 

14See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 

(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). 

15See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers 

Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 

2010) (Diamond Sawblades). 

1 ‘‘Tails’’ in this context means the tail fan, which 

includes the telson and the uropods. 

selling price’’ recorded Dillinger’s books 

and records as the cost of production for 

non-prime plate and the application of 

partial AFA to Salzgittter.8 However, the 

CIT remanded Commerce’s modelmatch methodology, related specifically 

to Commerce’s rejection of Dillinger’s 

proposed quality code for sour service 

petroleum transport plate, for further 

explanation or, if appropriate, 

reconsideration in light of Commerce’s 

approach in Bohler.9

In its final results of redetermination, 

issued on September 6, 2023, Commerce 

reconsidered its rejection of Dillinger’s 

proposed quality code for sour service 

petroleum transport plate and included 

this quality code in the control numbers 

used in Dillinger’s margin 

calculations.10 As a result of this 

change, Dillinger’s final estimated 

weighted-average dumping margin 

became 4.99 percent. The CIT sustained 

Commerce’s final results of 

redetermination.11 While this revision 

to Dillinger’s margin did not affect the 

calculation of the all-others rate, 

Commerce revised the all-others rate to 

be 20.99 percent in the Second Remand 

Redetermination.12 The CIT sustained 

this aspect of Commerce’s 

redetermination.13

Timken Notice 

In its decision in Timken,14 as 

clarified by Diamond Sawblades,15 the 

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal 

Circuit held that, pursuant to section 

516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act), Commerce must 

publish a notice of court decision that 

is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a Commerce 

determination and must suspend 

liquidation of entries pending a 

‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s 

December 21, 2023, judgment 

constitutes a final decision of the CIT 

that is not in harmony with Commerce’s 

Amended Final Determination. Thus, 

this notice is published in fulfillment of 

the publication requirements of Timken. 

Amended Final Determination 

Because there is now a final court 

judgment, Commerce is amending its 

Amended Final Determination with 

respect to Dillinger and all other 

producers and/or exporters as follows: 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

AG Der Dillinger Hu ̈ttenwerke .... 4.99 

All Others .................................... 20.99 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Because Dillinger has a superseding 

cash deposit rate, i.e., there have been 

final results published in a subsequent 

administrative review, we will not issue 

revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP). 

This notice will not affect the current 

cash deposit rate. For all other 

producers and exporters, Commerce 

will issue revised cash deposit 

instructions to CBP. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 516A(c) and 

(e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: January 5, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2024–00398 Filed 1–10–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–802, A–533–840, A–570–893, A–549– 

822] 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From the People’s Republic of China, 

India, Thailand, and the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam: Continuation of 

Antidumping Duty Orders; Correction 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; correction. 

SUMMARY: In the Federal Register of July 

5, 2023, the U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) published a 

notice of continuation of the 

antidumping duty (AD) orders on 

certain frozen warmwater shrimp from 

the People’s Republic of China (China), 

India, Thailand, and the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam). This 

notice contained an incorrect scope of 

the orders. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew Hart, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1058. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction 

In the Federal Register of July 5, 

2023, in FR Doc 2023–14181, on page 

42915 in the first and second columns, 

correct the scope of the orders to state: 

‘‘The scope of the orders includes 

certain frozen warmwater shrimp and 

prawns, whether wild caught (ocean 

harvested) or farm raised (produced by 

aquaculture), head on or head off, shell 

on or peeled, tail on or tail off,1

deveined or not deveined, cooked or 

raw, or otherwise processed in frozen 

form. 

The frozen warmwater shrimp and 

prawn products included in the scope of 

the orders, regardless of definitions in 

the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS), are products 

which are processed from warmwater 

shrimp and prawns through freezing 

and which are sold in any count size. 

The products described above may be 

processed from any species of 

warmwater shrimp and prawns. 

Warmwater shrimp and prawns are 

generally classified in, but are not 

limited to, the Penaeidae family. Some 

examples of the farmed and wild-caught 

warmwater species include, but are not 

limited to, white-leg shrimp (Penaeus 

vannemei), banana prawn (Penaeus 

merguiensis), fleshy prawn (Penaeus 

chinensis), giant river prawn 

(Macrobrachium rosenbergii), giant tiger 

prawn (Penaeus monodon), redspotted 

shrimp (Penaeus brasiliensis), southern 

brown shrimp (Penaeus subtilis), 

southern pink shrimp (Penaeus 

notialis), southern rough shrimp 

(Trachypenaeus curvirostris), southern 

white shrimp (Penaeus schmitti), blue 

shrimp (Penaeus stylirostris), western 

white shrimp (Penaeus occidentalis), 

and Indian white prawn (Penaeus 

indicus). 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1