alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                       CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with this Quarterly Report of Verdisys, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Andrew Wilson, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                            /s/ ANDREW WILSON
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:   Andrew Wilson
                                            Title:  Principal Accounting Officer
                                            Date:   November 19, 2003

A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Verdisys, Inc. and will be retained by Verdisys, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas P. Dulanski, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed, in accordance with the following Memorandum: The Cattaraugus County District Attorney’s Office and Sheriff’s Department are not "victims” within the meaning of Penal Law § 60.27 (1); therefore, the court erred by ordering defendant to make restitution to these agencies of the expenses incurred in extraditing defendant from California to face felony charges. The court does not have authority to sentence defendant to reimburse a law enforcement agency for public monies expended as part of its law enforcement operating costs *(see, People v Rowe,*152 AD2d 907, *affd for reasons stated at App Div*75 NY2d 948; *People v Pfaudler,*164 AD2d 873; *People v Purcell,*161 AD2d 812). That portion of the sentence must be vacated. In light of this determination, it is not necessary to address defendant’s remaining argument. (Appeal from Judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Kelly, J. — Bail Jumping, 2nd Degree.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4908 

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to provide assistance to schools 

to replace drinking water fountains that may contain lead, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 30, 2018 

Mr. RUSH (for himself, Mr. PALLONE, and Mrs. BUSTOS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to provide assistance 

to schools to replace drinking water fountains that may 

contain lead, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DRINKING WATER FOUNTAIN REPLACEMENT 

4 FOR SCHOOLS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part F of the Safe Drinking 

6 Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–21 et seq.) is amended by add7 ing at the end the following: 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4908 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 1465. DRINKING WATER FOUNTAIN REPLACEMENT 

2 FOR SCHOOLS. 

3 ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 180 days 

4 after the date of enactment of this section, the Adminis5 trator shall establish a grant program to provide assist6 ance to local educational agencies for the replacement of 

7 drinking water fountains manufactured prior to 1988. 

8 ‘‘(b) USE OF FUNDS.—Funds awarded under the 

9 grant program— 

10 ‘‘(1) shall be used to pay the costs of replace11 ment of drinking water fountains in schools; and 

12 ‘‘(2) may be used to pay the costs of monitoring 

13 and reporting of lead levels in the drinking water of 

14 schools of a local educational agency receiving such 

15 funds, as determined appropriate by the Adminis16 trator. 

17 ‘‘(c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

18 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

19 not more than $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 

20 through 2023.’’. 

21 (b) DEFINITIONS.—Section 1461 of the Safe Drink22 ing Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–21) is amended— 

23 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

24 (A) by inserting ‘‘or drinking water foun25 tain’’ after ‘‘drinking water cooler’’ each place 

26 it appears; and 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4908 IH

1 (B) by inserting ‘‘or fountain’’ after ‘‘the 

2 cooler’’; and 

3 (2) in paragraph (5), by inserting ‘‘or drinking 

4 water fountain’’ after ‘‘water cooler’’ each place it 

5 appears. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
#### Harvey TERRY, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12115.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

March 9, 1955.

Frank Thomas, Ardmore, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

JONES, Presiding Judge.

Harvey Terry was charged by ail information filed in the County Court of Love County with driving an automobile on the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, was tried, cofiyicted and sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and has appealed.

No brief has been filed on behalf of the accused and no appearance was made *193for him at the time the case-was assigned for oral argument. - Rule. 9 of the Criminal Court of Appeals, 22 O.S.A. c. 18, Appendix, provides:.' ' ■

> “When no counsel appears and ho briefs are filed, -the Court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court, and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and if no prejudicial error appears will affirm the judgment.”

The appeal was by transcript with petition in error attached. The questions presented in the petition in error were only questions which could be determined by the examination of a casemade. Since'the evidence is not before us, we have no way of considering the. assignments presented in the petition in error.

The judgment and sentence of the County Court of Love County is affirmed.

POWELL and BRETT, JJ., concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00007-CR

Jackie Smith, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-2005-300093, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Jackie Smith seeks to appeal from judgments of conviction for aggravated sexual

assault and indecency with a child by exposure. The trial court has certified that Smith waived the

right of appeal. The appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d

615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Patterson and Puryear

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: January 26, 2006

Do Not Publish
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4694 

To provide for the compensation of Federal employees furloughed during 

a Government shutdown. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 20, 2017 

Mr. BEYER (for himself, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. DESAULNIER, Mr. 

POCAN, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Ms. NORTON, Mrs. COMSTOCK, Mr. 

KILMER, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. PERLMUTTER, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Mr. 

CONNOLLY, Mr. CICILLINE, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Ms. MENG, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. BROWN of Maryland, Mr. HOYER, Mr. RASKIN, 

Mr. DELANEY, Mr. GARAMENDI, and Mr. LYNCH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide for the compensation of Federal employees 

furloughed during a Government shutdown. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Ret5 roactive Pay Fairness Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4694 IH

1 SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES FUR2 LOUGHED DURING A GOVERNMENT SHUT3 DOWN. 

4 Federal employees furloughed as a result of any lapse 

5 in appropriations that begins on or about December 22, 

6 2017, shall be compensated at their standard rate of com7 pensation, for the period of such lapse in appropriations, 

8 as soon as practicable after such lapse in appropriations 

9 ends. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1648]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               NATIONAL PULMONARY FIBROSIS AWARENESS WEEK

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. ERIK PAULSEN

                              of minnesota

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. PAULSEN. Mr. Speaker, today, nearly 200,000 Americans suffer from 
Pulmonary Fibrosis, and an estimated 40,000 lose their battle to this 
disease each year. One death every 13 minutes.
  Sadly, more than two-thirds of those living with Pulmonary Fibrosis 
will die within five years. And to top it all off there is no known 
cause and no known cure for this debilitating disease.
  Next week is ``World Pulmonary Fibrosis Awareness Week'' and an 
opportunity to raise awareness for H.R. 2505 the ``Pulmonary Fibrosis 
Research Enhancement Act.'' This legislation which I authored will 
establish a much needed national patient registry, encourage future 
research at the National Institute of Health, and create a national 
action plan to help us better understand this deadly disease.
  This is an important first step forward in the fight to find a cure 
for pulmonary fibrosis and deliver hope to thousands of Americans 
living with this disease. I urge my colleagues to join me and co-
sponsor H.R. 2505.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>   1

                           PAIRGAIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                   EXHIBIT 23.1--INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-72792 and 33-96080 on Form S-8 and No. 333-23067 on Form S-3, as amended, of
PairGain Technologies, Inc. of our report dated January 29, 1998, appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PairGain Technologies, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 1997.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Costa Mesa, California
March 27, 1998

                                      E-2
Exhibit 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Stephens, certify that:

1.   I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10  QSB  of  San  Jose
     International, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the  period  covered by this
     quarterly report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
     procedures  (as  defined in Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and I have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during  the  period in which  this  quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c)   presented in this report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
          the disclosure  controls and procedures  based on our evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of directors  (or
     persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6.   I have  indicated  in this  report  whether or not there  were  significant
     changes in internal  controls or in other factors that could  significantly
     affect  internal  controls  subsequent  to  the  date  of our  most  recent
     evaluation,  including any  corrective  actions with regard to  significant
     deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: July 23, 2004


By: /s/ David Stephens
   --------------------------
   David Stephens
   President and CEO
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of American Pharmaceutical Partners,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Nicole S. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



|                   
|-------------------
|Date:  May 13, 2003
|                   



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON uncz

—-cz

STATE OF WASHINGTON, )

DIVISION ONE

LJ -.

Respondent, )

No. 73762-7-1

IS c/j' r".r

v. )

UNPUBLISHED OPINION sr

ZC """

MICHAEL MARKNSEN,

Appellant.

i FILED: December 19, 2016

Dwyer, J. —As the parties predicted, the Supreme Court's opinion in

State v. Case, No. 92293-4 (Wash. Dec. 8, 2016),

http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/922934.pdf, is dispositive ofthe claim of

error raised in this appeal. The Case decision mandates affirmance of the trial

court's judgment. We so order.

The sole remaining question regards costs on appeal. This question was

fully briefed by the parties (it was raised in the brief of appellant, addressed in the

brief of respondent, and discussed in appellant's reply brief) and we granted oral

argument on the issue. After full consideration of the question, "we now choose

to exercise ourdiscretion and direct the clerk ofthe court not to award appellate

costs even though the State has substantially prevailed." In re Pers. Restraint of

Flippo, No. 92616-6 (Wash. Dec. 8, 2016), at 8,

http://www.courts.wa.aov/opinions/pdf/926166.pdf.
No. 73762-7-1/2

Affirmed.

We corfcur:

i

^r/

Skii^a&^jy^
# C_2010051EN.01003102.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 January 2010 — De Fays v Commission

(Case T-355/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Cross-appeal - Staff case - Officials - Leave - Sick leave - Unauthorised absence established following a medical examination - Deduction from annual leave entitlement - Loss of the benefit of remuneration)

2010/C 51/60

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Chantal De Fays (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Moyse and A. Salerno, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 June 2008 in Case F-97/07 De Fays v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking to have that judgment set aside.

De Fays

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal and the cross appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal and the cross appeal;

| 2. | Orders Chantal De Fays to pay the costs of the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Chantal De Fays to pay the costs of the appeal;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the cross appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the cross appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 8.11.2008.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 1117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00238]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4702-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]


Kentucky; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4702-DR), dated April 10, 2023, 
and related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on December 15, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, E. Craig Levy, 
Sr., of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of John E. Brogan as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-00238 Filed 1-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS MARIE PALAFOX-REYES,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-70924

Agency No. A070-735-665

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 13, 2012

Pasadena, California

Before: PREGERSON, HAWKINS, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Carlos Marie Palafox-Reyes (“Palafox”), a native and citizen of

Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s order of removal. We have

FILED

MAR 16 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
1

 Because Palafox is removable as an alien convicted of an aggravated

felony “crime of violence” under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F), we decline to address

the alternative grounds for removal relied upon by the BIA.

2

jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny Palafox’s petition for

review. We address his arguments in turn.

1. The documents submitted by the Department of Homeland Security

during Palafox’s removal proceedings established that: (1) Palafox was convicted

of first-degree burglary, in violation of California Penal Code § 459, and (2)

Palafox received a term of imprisonment of at least one year for his first-degree

burglary conviction. Accordingly, the BIA did not err in finding that Palafox was

removable as an alien convicted of an aggravated felony “crime of violence” under

8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F). See Kwong v. Holder, No. 04-72167, --- F.3d ----, 2011

WL 6061513, at *5 (9th Cir. Dec. 7, 2011); Lopez-Cardona v. Holder, 662 F.3d

1110, 1112 (9th Cir. 2011).1

2. Palafox argues that the term “alien” in the Immigration and Nationality

Act does not apply to him because he considers himself to be a “national” of the

United States. Palafox’s argument is foreclosed by our precedents. See Theagene

v. Gonzales, 411 F.3d 1107, 1112 (9th Cir. 2005); Reyes-Alcaraz v. Ashcroft, 363

F.3d 937 (9th Cir. 2004).

PETITION DENIED.
Exhibit 21.1


                                   SUBSIDIARIES OF MCC



Listed below are the names of certain subsidiaries, at least 50% owned, dir
of December 31, 1996.  Indented subsidiaries are direct subsidiaries of the
indented.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Percentage
                                                   Owned by          State of
                                                    Parent           Formation
<S>                                               <C>                <C>
Marcus Cable Company, L.P. (Registrant):             100.0%          Delaware

     Marcus Cable Capital Corporation                100.0%          Delaware

     Marcus Cable Capital Corporation III             99.0%          Delaware

     Marcus Fiberlink, L.L.C.                         99.8%          Delaware

     Marcus Cable Operating Company, L.P.            100.0%          Delaware

          Marcus Cable Capital Corporation II         99.8%          Delaware

          Marcus Cable Associates, L.P.               99.6%          Delaware

          Marcus Cable Partners, L.P.                100.0%          Delaware

               Marcus Cable, Inc.                    100.0%          Delaware

          Marcus Cable of Alabama, Inc. (1)           99.0%          Delaware

          Marcus Cable of Alabama, L.P.               99.9%          Delaware

          Marcus Cable of Delaware and Maryland, L.P. 99.9%          Delaware

<FN>
(1)  Marcus Cable of Alabama, Inc. holds 1% general partner interest in Marcus 
     Cable of Alabama, L.P.
</FN>
</TABLE>