alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Fred A. CARDINAL and Gloria M. Cardinal, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-1588.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued May 5, 1994.

Decided June 15, 1994.

*49Michael A. Stevenson (argued and briefed), Mark J. Hotz, United Autoworkers GM Legal Services Plan, Pontiac, MI, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Francis L. Zebot, Asst. U.S. Atty., Office of the U.S. Atty., Detroit, MI, Michael W. Davis, Gary R. Allen, Acting Chief (briefed), Richard Farber, David English Carmack (briefed), William S. Estabrook (argued), John A. Nolet, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Appellate Section Tax Div., Washington, DC, for defendant-appellant.

Before: JONES, RYAN, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.

RYAN, Circuit Judge.

What is the proper measure of a taxpayer’s interest in real property purchased under a land contract for purposes of assessing the value of a federal tax lien? The district court held that the taxpayers’ interest in the real property was limited to the amount the taxpayer had paid under the contract, 817 F.Supp. 647. We disagree and reverse.

Federal law governs the priority of a tax lien relative to other claims to property. *Aquilino v. United States,*363 U.S. 509, 513-14, 80 S.Ct. 1277, 1280-81, 4 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1960). However, state law generally determines what constitutes a property interest to which a federal tax lien may attach. *United States v. Brosnan,*363 U.S. 237, 240, 80 S.Ct. 1108, 1110-11, 4 L.Ed.2d 1192 (1960); *Vereyken v. Annie’s Place, Inc.,*964 F.2d 593, 594 (6th Cir.1992); *United States v. Big Value Supermarkets, Inc.,*898 F.2d 493, 496 (6th Cir.1990). Michigan recognizes a vendee’s equitable interest under a land contract for the purchase of real property as an interest to which a federal tax lien may attach. *Vereyken,*964 F.2d at 594. Under Michigan law, a vendee under a land contract takes equitable title to the land, while the vendor holds legal title and an equitable lien on the land in the amount of the unpaid purchase price. *Barker v. Klingler,*302 Mich. 282, 4 N.W.2d 596, 599 (1942). The tax lien attaches to whatever equity interest the taxpayer has in the property. The value of the equity interest depends on the fair market value of the property, *cf. Big Value Supermarkets,*898 F.2d at 497, and is measured by reducing the fair market value of the property by the amount due on the land contract and any liens superior to the federal tax lien, *e.g.,*local tax liens.1

Therefore, we REVERSE and REMAND the case to the district court to make factual findings on the fair market value of the property in 1988, and to recompute the federal tax lien in light of our conclusion that the vendee’s equitable interest is determined by reducing the fair market value of the real property by the amount of the vendor’s lien and any other liens superior to the federal tax lien.

1

. Local tax liens have priority over federal tax liens. I.R.C. § 6323(b)(6); Mich. Stat. Ann. § 7.104.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4960 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

511 East Walnut Street in Columbia, Missouri, as the ‘‘Spc. Sterling 

William Wyatt Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2018 

Mrs. HARTZLER (for herself, Mr. CLAY, Mrs. WAGNER, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, 

Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. GRAVES of Missouri, Mr. LONG, and Mr. SMITH of 

Missouri) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 511 East Walnut Street in Columbia, Missouri, as the ‘‘Spc. Sterling William Wyatt Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPC. STERLING WILLIAM WYATT POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 511 East Walnut Street in CoVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:05 Feb 10, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4960.IH H4960

dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4960 IH

1 lumbia, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Spc. Sterling William Wyatt Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Spc. Sterling William 

7 Wyatt Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANPSORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

In the Matter of: 

REGENT AEROSPACE 

CORPORATION 

) 

) 

) Docket No. F AA-2013-0852 (FAA Case 

) No.2010GL110030) 

) 

) 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL 

The Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA''), pursuant to a settlement 

agreement, hereby withdraws its August 11, 2015 "Complainant's Notice of Appeal" that 

appealed the Administrative Law Judge's initial decision, dated July 27, 2015, in the 

above-referenced case. 

Respectfully submitted, 

J n C. Stuart, J . 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Email: mike.stuart@faa.gov 

Phone: (202) 267-9958 

Fax: (202) 267-5106 

Dated: October 23,2015 

RECEIVED 

OCT 2 3 2015 

HEARING DOCKET 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have sent on this date, as described below, the FAA's 

Notice of Withdrawal of Appeal in In the matter of Regent Aerospace Corporation, FAA 

Docket No. FAA-2013-0852 (Case No. 2010GL!l0030) 

Original and one copy - by personal delivery and fax: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Suite 2Wl000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Fax: (202) 493-5142 

Copy- by certified mail, return receipt requested and by email: 

Jeffrey Clement, Esq. 

Hoff Law Group 

Suite 330 

13 5 S. LaSalle Street 

Chicago Illinois 60603-4134 

Email: jfc@aviationattomey.com 

Dated: October 2Ul5
Exhibit 32.3

Certification of Chief Accounting Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010(the Report) of MCG
Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Linda A. Nimmons, the Chief Accounting Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ LINDA A. NIMMONSName:

Linda A. NimmonsTitle:

Chief Accounting OfficerDate

May 4, 2010
#### Mabel GREENLEAF, Guardian of George McIntosh, a Minor, Plaintiff in Error, v. Pauline GREENLEAF et al., Defendants in Error.

No. 36586.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Oct. 11, 1955.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 17, 1956.

Application for Leave to File Second Petition for Rehearing Denied Feb. 21, 1956.

Hulsey & Hulsey, McAlester, for plaintiff in error.

Porter & Porter, Muskogee, Milam M„ King, Checotah, for defendants in error.

CORN, Justice.

This case involves the question whether George McIntosh, a minor grandson of the deceased Taylor Greenleaf, is a legitimate child of Rosa a deceased daughter of said decedent Taylor Greenleaf, and David McIntosh father of said George McIntosh, and entitled to inherit the interest of his mother by right of representation, or whether he is an illegitimate child of Rosa, deceased, and is thereby precluded from inheriting by right of representation under the laws of descent and distribution of this State.

The guardian, in her brief, cites as follows :

> “10 O.S.1951 § 1: All children born in wedlock are presumed to be legitimate.”

> “10 O.S.1951 § 3: The presumption of legitimacy can be disputed only by the husband or wife or the descendent of one or both of them. Illegitimacy in such a case may be proved like any other fact.”

The guardian then contends that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to try the legitimacy of the minor, George McIntosh, for the reason no one, having statutory authority, put his legitimacy at issue.

The above statute provides “all children born in wedlock are presumed to be legitimate.” From an examination of the record we do not find any evidence to establish that the minor, George McIntosh, was born in wedlock, but to the contrary the evidence discloses that his mother was-living with her father when he was born, she was never married to David McIntosh, and had never lived with him, which overcomes the presumption of legitimacy.

*317Under the above facts the trial court' held, in part, as follows:

> “The court finds that George McIntosh is an illegitimate child of Rose Greenleaf and1 one David McIntosh, and concludes, as a matter of law that he is precluded from inheriting by right of representation, any part of his grandfather’s estate. * * * ”

' The judgment of the trial court is not contrary to the clear weight of the evidence, but is amply supported thereby. Judgment affirmed.

WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and DAVISON, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.

WELCH, J., dissents.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1487-E1488]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         MAJOR DONALD HOLLEDER

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. JACK KINGSTON

                               of georgia

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 12, 2012

  Mr. KINGSTON. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize the life and 
accomplishments of Donald Holleder, Major, United States Army.
  Donald Holleder was born on August 3, 1934, in Buffalo, New York. He 
was an outstanding high school athlete, and was sought

[[Page E1488]]

after by some of America's most prestigious universities. But Donald 
Holleder chose to attend the United States Military Academy at West 
Point, even forgoing a National Football League draft selection by the 
New York Giants in 1956 to serve as an officer in the Army.
  Don Holleder was, by nature, a selfless man who subordinated himself 
to the greater good of the team, whether that team was on the football 
field or the field of battle. He was the embodiment of a true leader, 
willing to endure personal sacrifice so that others could succeed, even 
at risk to his own personal safety.
  Major Holleder's actions in Vietnam on the morning of October 17th, 
1967 at the Battle of Ong Thanh were unparalleled in their bravery. 
According to eyewitness accounts documented in the Army's 
recommendation for award, his actions to save wounded soldiers under 
enemy fire were above and beyond the call of duty. After several 
requests to be permitted to assist his men, the Brigade Commander 
relented and gave his approval. Having voluntarily gone outside the 
perimeter, armed with only a .45 caliber pistol and advised of the 
peril he faced, he ran several times into no-man's land, risking his 
own life to save others. Stabilizing a rapidly deteriorating situation 
and reestablishing command, this Brigade staff officer saved many lives 
before he was mortally wounded.
  On April 27th, 2012, Major Donald Holleder was posthumously awarded 
the Distinguished Service Cross in recognition of his sacrifice. His 
actions were indeed so notable and involved risk of life so 
extraordinary that he clearly deserves to be set apart from his 
comrades, exemplifying the timeless values of courage and sacrifice 
that this award is intended to honor.

                          ____________________
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 9606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00455]



[[Page 9605]]

Vol. 89

Friday,

No. 28

February 9, 2024

Part XII





 Department of Labor





-----------------------------------------------------------------------





Semiannual Regulatory Agenda

Federal Register / Vol. 89 , No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2024 / UA: 
Reg Flex Agenda

[[Page 9606]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary

20 CFR Chs. I, IV, V, VI, VII, and IX

29 CFR Subtitle A and Chs. II, IV, V, XVII, and XXV

30 CFR Ch. I

41 CFR Ch. 60

48 CFR Ch. 29


Semiannual Agenda of Regulations

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Labor.

ACTION: Semiannual Regulatory Agenda.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The internet has become the means for disseminating the 
entirety of the Department of Labor's semiannual regulatory agenda. 
However, the Regulatory Flexibility Act requires publication of a 
regulatory flexibility agenda in the Federal Register. This Federal 
Register Notice contains the regulatory flexibility agenda.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Albert T. Herrera, Director, Office of 
Regulatory and Programmatic Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary 
for Policy, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Room 
S-2312, Washington, DC 20210; (202) 693-5959.

    Note:  Information pertaining to a specific regulation can be 
obtained from the agency contact listed for that particular 
regulation.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Executive Order 12866 requires the 
semiannual publication of an agenda of regulations that contains a 
listing of all the regulations the Department of Labor expects to have 
under active consideration for promulgation, proposal, or review during 
the coming one-year period. The entirety of the Department's semiannual 
agenda is available online at www.reginfo.gov.
    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 602) requires DOL to 
publish in the Federal Register a regulatory flexibility agenda. The 
Department's Regulatory Flexibility Agenda, published with this notice, 
includes only those rules on its semiannual agenda that are likely to 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities; and those rules identified for periodic review in keeping 
with the requirements of section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 
Thus, the regulatory flexibility agenda is a subset of the Department's 
semiannual regulatory agenda. The Department's Regulatory Flexibility 
Agenda does not include section 610 items at this time.
    All interested members of the public are invited and encouraged to 
let departmental officials know how our regulatory efforts can be 
improved and are invited to participate in and comment on the review or 
development of the regulations listed on the Department's agenda.

Julie A. Su,
Acting Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2024-00455 Filed 2-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
exv10w35w3



 






Exhibit 10.35.3




PROMISSORY NOTE




	 	 	 
	$3,500,000

	 	Date: March 31, 2005






     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS
PUERTO RICO INC. (the “Lender”) at its office located at 300 Somerset Corporate Blvd., Bridgewater,
New Jersey 08807, the sum of THREE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($3,500,000), payable as
follows:



     The unpaid balance of this Note will bear interest from the date of its execution until full
payment at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum and shall be payable in two (2) equal
installments of ONE MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,750,500); the first of these
installments shall be made on July 29, 2005 and the second these installments shall be made on
December 30, 2005.



     The entire unpaid balance of this Note shall immediately become due and payable without demand
or notice of any kind (a) if any installment is not paid within the ten (10) day grace period or if
any other sum owed under this Note or any other obligation to the Lender is not paid when due, or
(b) if the undersigned shall admit in writing its inability to pay its debts or makes an assignment
for the benefit of creditors, or if a receiver is appointed for any property of the undersigned, or
if any petition is filed by or against the undersigned under any provisions of any law relating to
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or relief of debtors, or (c) upon the failure in business,
dissolution or termination of existence of the undersigned.



     In the event of default in payment of this Note, Inyx, Inc. shall supply Lender all Sanofi
Aventis products (under any current Manufacturing and Supply Agreement between the parties) free of
charge until payment under this Note is duly satisfied.



     The undersigned agrees to satisfy all of the Lender’s costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees
incurred in the judicial or extra-judicial collection of this Note.



     The undersigned hereby waives protest and agrees that the Lender may extend the time of
payment, or release any collateral held, with or without notice, to the undersigned. After such an
occurrence, all the undersigned will remain liable as if it had expressly consented to such
extension or release.



     This Note is subject to and shall be construed under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico.



 









 





-2-




     The undersigned acknowledges receipt of a true and exact copy of this Note.



     EXECUTED in San Juan, Puerto Rico, on the date first set forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	INYX, INC.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	By:
	 	/s/ JACK KACHKAR
	

	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	JACK KACHKAR
	

	 	 	 	Chairman & CEO






Affidavit No. 603




     Acknowledged and subscribed to before me in San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 31st day of
March 2005, by Jack Kachkar, who is of legal age, married, property owner, resident of Key
Biscayne, Florida, as Chairman & CEO of Inyx, Inc.



	 	 	 
	
	 	/s/ Doira Diaz Rivera


	
	 	Doira Diaz Rivera

	
	 	Notary
Public
**MotorDriverType Notes** 

Direct Drive Belt Driven Shaded-Pole
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          67,989
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,334
<INVENTORY>                                    119,970
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               273,676
<PP&E>                                         237,611
<DEPRECIATION>                               (113,954)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 628,335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          295,126
<BONDS>                                        274,992
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   628,335
<SALES>                                        996,164
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               996,164
<CGS>                                          340,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  933,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,507
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,504
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,915
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,589
<DISCONTINUED>                                (13,967)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (12,183)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,561)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of  A J&J PHARMA CORPORATION,
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Kevin Ericksteen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Kevin Ericksteen


Kevin
      Ericksteen


Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




Date: July
      23, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent 

 v. 

ANTONIO MARSELIS JONES, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 38 MM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 20th day of March, 2015, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.