alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1482]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                CONSTITUTION DAY 2012 CELEBRATION--MIAMI

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN

                               of florida

                    in the house of representatives

                      Tuesday, September 11, 2012

  Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN. Mr. Speaker, next week, Monday, September 17th is 
Constitution Day.
  This day marks the 225th anniversary of the adoption of the United 
States Constitution by our Founding Fathers.
  On that day in 1787 the members of the Constitutional Convention of 
Philadelphia reached a watershed moment, collectively adopting the 
Constitution that embodies the ideals of a new nation and a free 
people.
  Over the course of this upcoming week, Americans from all walks of 
life will gather to commemorate this sacred document by collectively 
reading the Constitution in Constitution Day events nationwide.
  Tomorrow, at 5:30 p.m. at the Miami History Museum on West Flagler 
Street, local law firm Higer, Lichter & Givner, in conjunction with 
History Miami, will host students, veterans, business and community 
leaders, and all who wish to join, as they gather together to read and 
honor the Constitution.
  This is a wonderful tradition, and I strongly encourage everyone to 
take part in this important event.

                          ____________________
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3427

_____________________________

JAZZMYN JONES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County.

Gregory S. Parker, Judge.

February 23, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and RAY and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Kevin P. Steiger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
================================================================================

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 32.2

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Whistler  Investments,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended October 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Mehboob Charania, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge:  (1) The Report fully  complies
with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

                                                /s/ Mehboob Charania
                                                ---------------------
                                                 Mehboob Charania
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

December 15, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

BRANDON M. CARRIGAN,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 19, 2019

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID Nos. 1109008434 &

§ 1503000827 (N)

§

§

 Submitted: May 13, 2019

 Decided: July 19, 2019

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s 

motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the Superior Court’s

order, dated December 13, 2018, adopting the Commissioner’s report and 

recommendation, dated August 21, 2018, and summarily dismissing the second 

motion for postconviction relief should be affirmed.

1

 Carrigan was not convicted 

after trial, he did not satisfy the requirements of Superior Court Criminal Rule 

61(d)(2),

2

and his claims were meritless. The Superior Court did not err in denying 

 

1

State v. Carrigan, 2018 WL 6601174 (Del. Super. Ct. Dec. 13, 2018).

2 Del. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(d)(2) (providing that a second or subsequent Rule 61 motion “shall 

be summarily dismissed, unless the movant was convicted after a trial and the motion” pleads with 

particularity new evidence creating a strong inference that the movant was actually innocent or a 

new rule of constitutional law made retroactive to cases on collateral review).
2

Carrigan’s motion for appointment of counsel and in summarily dismissing the 

postconviction motion. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is 

GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5


                           EXHIBIT 27
                                
                    FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
            (in thousands except per share amounts)
       
<S>                                                 <C>
                                
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                    $1,361
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           2,416
<PP&E>                                                   432,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                             8,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           433,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     15,839
<BONDS>                                                   68,539
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                     452
<OTHER-SE>                                               345,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             433,903
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          46,666
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          18,882
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         7,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           31,291
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       31,291
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                              31,291
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               2.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               1.94
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6476]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under the previous order, the 
leadership time is reserved.

                          ____________________
```
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 487 

To prohibit the Central Intelligence Agency from using an unmanned aerial 

vehicle to carry out a weapons strike or other deliberately lethal action 

and to transfer the authority to conduct such strikes or lethal action 

to the Department of Defense. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2017 

Mr. BURGESS (for himself and Mr. AMASH) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, 

and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Central Intelligence Agency from using an 

unmanned aerial vehicle to carry out a weapons strike 

or other deliberately lethal action and to transfer the 

authority to conduct such strikes or lethal action to 

the Department of Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 487 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE 

2 AGENCY OPERATION OF UNMANNED AERIAL 

3 VEHICLE STRIKES AND TRANSFER OF AU4 THORITY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, no officer or employee of, or contractor or 

7 detailee to, the Central Intelligence Agency shall use an 

8 unmanned aerial vehicle to carry out a weapons strike or 

9 other lethal action. 

10 (b) TRANSFER TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.— 

11 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the President 

12 shall transfer to the Department of Defense all authority 

13 to use an unmanned aerial vehicle to carry out a weapons 

14 strike or other lethal action. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10474

Conference Calendar

 

DON BENNY ANDERSON,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

L. E. FLEMING, Warden FMC-Fort Worth,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:03-CV-00219

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Don Benny Anderson (federal prisoner # 06260-026) filed a

petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 wherein he sought to

challenge his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy, interstate

transportation to commit arson, and damaging a building with an

explosive device. Concluding that Anderson was required to

proceed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 rather than 28 U.S.C. § 2241, the

district court summarily dismissed the petition. 
No. 03-10474

-2-

Anderson has failed to satisfy the requirements for filing a

28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. See Reyes-Requena v. United States,

243 F.3d 893, 900-04 (5th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, the judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Docket No: FAA

- 2015

- 8469 Dir ID: 2014

- NM

- 105

- AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 5/21/14

Regional Airline Association 5/21/14

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 5/21/14

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 5/21/14
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of San Jose International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher Greenwood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of May 2003.

/s/ Christopher Greenwood
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6441]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      NATIONAL PREPAREDNESS MONTH

 Mr. BEGICH. Mr. President, I wish to proclaim September 2012 
as Alaska Preparedness Month. No one can predict when or where the next 
crisis will be, and as a state that is particularly vulnerable to 
natural disasters and human-caused emergencies, it is essential that 
Alaskans be prepared to respond to any crisis that may arise.
  The American public remains largely uninformed on and unprepared for 
possible disasters and other life-threatening emergencies in their 
communities. Since government agencies and disaster organizations 
cannot bear sole responsibility for preparing and responding to 
disasters, it is important for all to plan ahead.
  National Preparedness Month is a nationwide effort led by the 
American Red Cross to raise awareness about the importance of planning 
for all types of emergencies. Held each September, National 
Preparedness Month aims to encourage American households to learn more 
about preparedness and to create a family disaster plan.
  It is my hope that by proclaiming September 2012 as Alaska 
Preparedness Month, Alaskans will be inspired to make sure they are 
well-equipped to deal with any and all possible crises in the 
future.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4656 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4656

 To extend a prohibition relating to permits for discharges incidental 
              to the normal operation of certain vessels.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 14, 2017

    Ms. Herrera Beutler (for herself and Mr. Kilmer) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend a prohibition relating to permits for discharges incidental 
              to the normal operation of certain vessels.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fishing and Small Vessel Relief 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS.

    Section 2(a) of Public Law 110-299 (33 U.S.C. 1342 note) is amended 
by striking ``December 18, 2017'' and inserting ``December 18, 2020''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0655 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER PAUL MCKEEN,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 13 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 8 2023

08/08/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0655
**Order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 16 December 2008 – Italy v EESC and Commission**

**(Case T-117/08)**

Procedural issue – Objection of inadmissibility – Partial inadmissibility of the action – Acts not imputable to the Commission

1.                     *Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Identification of the subject-matter of the dispute
– Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based (Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance,
Art. 44(1)(c)) (see paras 14-15)*

2.                     *Actions for annulment – Action brought against a vacancy notice emanating from the Economic and Social Committee and not from
the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) – Act imputable exclusively to that Committee – Action brought against the
Committee and the Commission – Partial inadmissibility (Art. 230 EC) (see paras 17-21)*

**Re:**

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ANNULMENT of Vacancy Notice No 73/07 concerning the post of Secretary-General (grade A\* 16) to the EESC, published in the | Official Journal of the European Union | on 28 December 2007 (OJ 2007 C 316 A, p. 1), and the corrigendum to that notice published in the | Official Journal of the European Union | on 30 January 2008 (OJ 2008 C 25 A, p. 21). |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The application is dismissed as inadmissible in so far as it is directed against the Commission. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | The Italian Republic is ordered to pay, in addition to the costs it incurred in the context of the present action in so far as it is directed against the Commission, the costs incurred by the Commission. |
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1543-E1544]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

THE CLAIMS LICENSING ADVANCEMENT FOR INTERSTATE MATTERS ACT (CLAIM) ACT

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. STEPHEN LEE FINCHER

                              of tennessee

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 14, 2012

  Mr. FINCHER. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to introduce a bill I believe 
will help consumers save millions of dollars in insurance costs and 
create more jobs. I am proud to introduce the Claims Licensing 
Advancement for Interstate Matters Act, known as the CLAIM Act.

[[Page E1544]]

  Under current law, independent claims adjusters face a hodgepodge of 
inconsistent state regulations that only serve to delay the prompt 
adjustment of claims for natural disasters, car accident victims, and 
other tragedies in life. The CLAIM Act would provide specific relief 
during a natural disaster. In areas designated by the President of the 
United States as a ``Disaster Area,'' independent claims adjusters who 
meet certain criteria would be eligible to adjust claims for losses 
notwithstanding the state the adjuster is licensed.
  Every independent claims adjuster must take a license examination in 
each state in which they work. This requires adjusters to take time off 
from their job and travel to each state in which they seek a license. 
This is a costly burden on the claims adjusters, the companies that 
employ them, and ultimately, the consumer. Sadly, it is the consumer 
who currently pays for these costs in higher premiums.
  Today, it is my pleasure to introduce a bill that would end this 
costly burden. The CLAIM Act would lead to a process that would provide 
independent claims adjusters licensing reciprocity so their home-state 
license is valid in any other state. To be clear the CLAIM Act does not 
create a new federal law and does not ``federalize'' the insurance 
industry. The CLAIM Act respects states' rights to continue to regulate 
their individual insurance industries. Rather, the CLAIM Act would urge 
the National Association of Insurance Commissioners to adopt a model 
licensing standard for state regulation for independent claims 
adjusters that each individual State would adopt. The CLAIM Act would 
make sure that each state keeps its independence to adopt rules as they 
see fit and recognizes that State insurance regulators are best 
situated to address insurance licensing standards.
  The goal of this bill is to streamline the claims adjustment process 
so that individual claims adjusters can respond in the fastest possible 
and most cost-effective manner possible. I look forward to further 
discussing the issues of reciprocity and the CLAIM Act as we move 
forward in the Committee process.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  Exhibit 10.8.2

                               THIRD AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment"), made and
     entered into as of January 31, 1998, by and among Detroit Diesel
     Corporation, a Delaware corporation, as assignee of Penske Transportation,
     Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Employer"), and A. Gordon Clark (the
     "Employee").

     WHEREAS, Employer and Employee mutually executed an Employment Agreement
     dated as of February 1, 1989, as amended by a First Amendment dated as of
     January 31, 1992 and a Second Amendment dated as of January 31, 1995 (the
     "Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, it is the desire of the parties hereto to further amend the
     Agreement as provided herein.

     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, receipt and
     sufficiency whereof are hereby acknowledged, it is agreed by and between
     the parties hereto as follows:

Section 1 of the Agreement is further amended to delete the last sentence and to
     add the following sentence in substitution for the last sentence:

"The term of this Agreement shall be extended for one year commencing on
     February 1, 1998 and ending on January 31, 1999 and will thereafter be
     automatically renewed on an annual basis unless either the Employee or the
     Employer notifies the other of their election to terminate this Agreement
     at least 30 days prior to the end of any extended term."

Section 6(c) of the Agreement is amended to delete "December 31, 1992" and add
     the following in its place:

"one year from the date of termination".

Except as expressly modified herein, the Agreement shall continue in full force
     and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment
     effective as of the date first above written.

DETROIT DIESEL CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF PENSKE TRANSPORTATION, INC. 
     ("Employer")



By:
   ------------------------------------------

Title:
      ---------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------
A. Gordon Clark ("Employee")



                                       64
Find more data on this and other topics at www.arc.gov/chartbook

POPULATION CHANGE BY SUBREGION

MINORITY POPULATION

POPULATION GROWTH

POPULATION CHANGE

MINORITY POPULATION BY GROUP





	











 









	






 




 



 






	






 

Proximity to major 

research universities

“Retirement Destination” 

designations

Diversied 

economies

9.7% 5.1% 3.8%

African Americans Hispanics/Latinos Other

Up from 9.2%

in 2010

Up from 4.2%

in 2010

Up from 3.0%

in 2010





	 


	





18.6% 39.3%

APPALACHIA U.S.

 Up from 16.4% in 2010 Up from 36.2% in 2010

-2.7%

-2.2%

-0.9%

+5.7%

+3.3%




				




	

	




	
















 ­ 




	 



­