CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: SCAQMD

Rule No(s): 1114 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: 5/3/2013

Rule Title(s): Petroleum Refinery Coking Operations

Date Submitted to ARB: 6/19/2013

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): N/A

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Naveen Berry Phone Number: 909.396.2363 E-mail Address: nberry@aqmd.gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

The proposed rule will estab lish a depressurization limit of less than two pounds per sq uare inch gauge (psig)

pressure prior to venting a coke drum to atmosphere and includes options for alternative compliance schedules

for facilities not able to meet the rule compliance timeli ne, depending on the number of delayed coking units they

operate. The proposed rule also includes deadlines fo r permit applications and installation of monitoring

equipment and downtime notification provisions, record keeping provisions and exemptions from certain

Regulation IV requirements.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, w ill result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach referenc e(s) for emission factor(s)

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for th is Source Category: No prior commitment

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Em issions: 2010 Area Affected: SCAB

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) : VOC emission reductions are expected beginning November 1, 2013, achieving 129, tons per year in January 1, 2019,

when Rule 1114 will be fully implemented.CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: 0.01 tpd

Emissions Reduction Commitment in t he SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): 0.73 tpd VOC

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): 0.35 tpd VOC

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: None

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0%

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 6 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : BP*, Carson, Chevron Products Co ., El Segundo, ExxonMobil, Torrance; Phillips 66, Carson; Tesoro Corp.,

Wilmington; Valero Energy, Wilmington, all located in Los Angeles County.

* Acquired by Tesoro Corp. as of 6/1/2013

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Sectio n(s) of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emi ssion Reductions are: Work Practice Standards

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): N/A Wo rk Practice Standards in Section(s): (c)

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): (f) Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: The net effect on air quality from the implementat ion of Rule 1114 is a projected 0.35 tpd reduction in VOC

emissions from the estimated 0.73 tpd baseline inventory.