alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 285TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on July 15, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise

or reverse your judgment between

Art Reyna, Appellant

V.

Irene Baldridge and Kathy Hill, Appellee

No. 04-14-00740-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2014-CI-03985

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order

is AFFIRMED. We tax costs of this appeal against Appellant Art Reyna.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on September 23, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-14-00740-CV

Art Reyna

v.

Irene Baldridge and Kathy Hill

(NO. 2014-CI-03985 IN 285TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

CLERK'S RECORD

FILING

INDIGENT

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51

FEE

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$191.00

$100.00

$25.00

$20.00

$50.00

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

FLOYD CONTRERAS

EDWARD CANO

DARBY RILEY

FLOYD CONTRERAS

RONALD PRICE

FLOYD S CONTRERAS

FLOYD S CONTRERAS

FLOYD S CONTRERAS

FLOYD S CONTRERAS

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this September 23, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
Map Created: March 2014

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2011

Relative Per Capita Income Rates in Appalachia, 2011

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

Per capita income is a measure of the total personal income of 

an area divided by the resident population of the area. The 

percent of the U.S. average is computed by dividing the county 

per capita income by the national average and multiplying by 

100. The map uses critical breaks such as the national average 

to organize the data into groups of common values.

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

46.4% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.9%

100.0% - 118.5%

Percent of the U.S. Average 

U.S. average = $42,298

Appalachian average = $34,688

(Critical Breaks Classification)
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certifications**

 

I, Kay L. Toolson, certifythat:

 

1.             I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K of Monaco Coach Corporation;

 

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.                                       Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.                                       The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)              designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)              disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)              all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Dated: |   | March 16, 2004 |                    | /s/: Kay L. Toolson |
|--------|--------|----------------|-------------------------|---------------------|
|   |   |           | Kay L. Toolson          |
|   |   |           | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
F iled : August 24 , 20 1 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 1 1

- 6214 ( 5:10

- hc

- 02206

- D )

CALVIN B. NELSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

JONATHAN MINER,
Respondent

- Appellee.

O R D E R

The C ourt amends its o pinion filed August 2 , 201 1 , as

follows:

On the cover sheet caption , the name of “JONATHAN

MINER” is substituted for the name of “WILLIAM SCISM” as
Appellee.

For the Court

– By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11** 
**- 6214** 

CALVIN B. NELSON ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

JONATHAN MINER , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:10

- hc

- 02206

- D )

Submitted : July 28, 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Calvin B. Nelson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Calvin B. Nelson, a District of Columbia offender , seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief
without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2241 ( West 200 6 & Supp.

201 1 ) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit
justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability
will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denia l of a
constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the
district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies
this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitut ional
claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38
(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural
grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive
procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a
debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack ,
529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record

and conclude that Nelson has not made the requisite showing.

Acc ordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny leave
to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argume nt would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Order entered December 20 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00422
- CR NOLAN LAVON JOHNSON, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194 th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 14
- 48249
- M



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s December 19, 2016 second motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief. We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER appellant’s brief file d within seven days from the date of this order. If appellant’s brief is not filed within seven days from the
date of this order , this appeal will be abated for the trial court to ma ke findings in accordance with Rule of Appellant P rocedure 38.8.

/s/ ADA B ROWN JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5535]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     DON'T FORGET THE LITTLE PEOPLE

  (Ms. HOCHUL asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Ms. HOCHUL. Madam Speaker, ``Don't forget the little people.'' That's 
what a gentleman said as he grabbed my hand and looked into my eyes at 
the Sanborn Farm Museum French toast breakfast on Saturday morning. 
``Don't forget the little people.''
  Who are these little people? I'll tell you right now, these are 
millions of moms and dads sitting at their dinner table tonight trying 
to cover their worried expression from their kids as they look over 
their family finances, wondering whether Congress is going to step up 
to the plate and give them the tax break they so desperately deserve.
  Only in Washington will people tell you you need to address our 
growing out-of-control deficit by spending a trillion dollars on tax 
breaks for millionaires and billionaires. And not just that. That puts 
us into further debt with the Chinese. I've got a problem with that.
  It seems simple to me. If we want to cut our deficit, we cut 
spending, and we also ask those who benefited from tax breaks for the 
last decade to pay their fair share.
  Like many of us, I'm with the little people and I'm with the middle 
people. Let's vote for a middle class tax cut today.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 STATE/COUNTRY OFNAME
    
    INCORPORATIONAsyst Technologies Europe Ltd.
    
    
    U.K.Asyst Technologies GmbH
    
    GermanyAsyst Technologies Far East Pte. Ltd.
    
    SingaporeAsyst Technologies Taiwan Ltd.
    
    
    R.O.C.Asyst Technologies Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
    
    MalaysiaSMIF Equipment Tianjin Co. Ltd.
    
    
    P.R.C.Asyst Korea, Ltd.
    
    KoreaAsyst Technologies Japan Holding Co., Inc.
    
    JapanAsyst Technologies Japan, Inc.
    
    Japan
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1594]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         HONORING NANCY OSBORNE

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. DEVIN NUNES

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Mr. NUNES. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor Nancy Osborne, an 
important public figure in the Central Valley news industry, on the 
occasion of her retirement.
  Ms. Osborne graduated from Las Cruces High School in New Mexico and 
attended New Mexico State University for 3 years.
  Following a five year break from her education, she returned to 
college in the valley at Fresno State University. She graduated in 1976 
with a BA in Speech Communications and began work on a Master's degree.
  After a year of graduate study, she accepted a reporting job at 
ABC30. As one of only a handful of women in the local broadcast 
industry, Nancy became a role model for many young women.
  In the fall of 1977, Nancy joined the anchor team at KFSN-TV. In 
1980, she produced and anchored the valley's first locally produced 
news magazine show while continuing to co-anchor Action News.
  In 1996, Nancy joined the Action News Management Team. While 
continuing her coverage of the valley's political scene and issues 
involving children and families, she was named Executive Producer--
Special Projects. With this new assignment, she helped shape Action 
News around the clock.
  In January 2004, after a short hiatus, Nancy returned to reporting 
full time, once again adding her experience and expertise to the 
expanding daily Action News coverage while continuing to co-anchor 
Action News Live at Five. She also wrote a popular blog, ``The Red, 
White, and True'', which focused on stories about the Central Valley's 
military personnel and families.
  In 2005, Nancy was inducted into the prestigious Silver Circle by the 
Northern California chapter of the National Academy of Television Arts 
and Sciences for her commitment of over 25 years to the Fresno 
television market and broadcast news industry.
  Nancy has reported on countless stories and events important to the 
people of Central California and she has given her time and effort to 
numerous non-profits and charities over the decades. Please join me in 
congratulating Ms. Osborne on her ``award-winning and trailblazing 
television career,'' as she retires from ABC30 Action News.

                          ____________________
```
Per capita market income is a measure of an area's total 

personal income, less transfer payments, divided by the 

resident population of the area. The percent of the U.S. 

average is computed by dividing the county per capita 

market income by the national average and multiplying by 

100. The map uses critical breaks such as the national 

average to organize the data into groups of common values.

Map Created: March 2012

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2009

Relative Per Capita Market Income Rates in Appalachia, 2009

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

26.6% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.9%

100.0% - 115.3%

Percent of the U.S. Average 

U.S. average = $32,691

Appalachian average = $24,553

(Critical Breaks Classification)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6445]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        TRIBUTE TO PETER J. FOS

 Mr.VITTER. Mr. President, today I wish to recognize Dr. Peter 
J. Fos. In January, Dr. Fos was named the sixth leader and first 
president of the University of New Orleans. A New Orleans native and 
graduate of UNO, Dr. Fos received his degree in biological sciences and 
a doctor of dental surgery from LSU Health Sciences Center. He also 
earned his masters of public health and doctor of philosophy in health 
care decision analysis from Tulane University.
  Prior to being selected as president, Dr. Fos served as a professor 
and program director of health policy and systems management at LSU 
Health Sciences Center where he oversaw curriculum development and 
assessment and student and faculty professional development.
  He also served as provost and executive vice president for 3 years at 
the University of Texas at Tyler and spent 4 years as dean of the 
College of Health at the University of Southern Mississippi. Dr. Fos 
has also held positions at the Mississippi State Department of Health, 
the University of Nevada, Las Vegas School of Dental Medicine, Tulane 
University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, and Tulane 
University Department of Health Systems Management.
  In addition to increasing enrollment under new admissions standards, 
Dr. Fos also has both short and long-term goals which include improving 
communication both on and off campus and reconnecting UNO to the local 
business community.
  At a time when Louisiana's higher education system is being asked to 
do more with less, it is important that those tasked with guiding our 
universities into the future do so in ways that will not compromise the 
educational value provided to Louisiana's students. With his long 
career educating our youth, I am pleased for Dr. Fos that he has been 
selected to lead UNO, and I congratulate him on this great 
honor.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Annual Report of Canadian Zinc Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Martin Rip, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:









(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and









(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 13, 2010
By:
/s/  Martin RipMartin Rip

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.







1
20-F











Exhibit 10.1  




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-10008 and
No. 333-13770), and Form F-3/A (No. 333-116044) of our report dated March 30, 2005, with
respect to the financial statements of BluePhoenix Solutions Ltd. included in this annual
report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004. 



			

/s/ Ziv Haft
——————————————

Ziv Haft

Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
BDO Member Firm






Tel-Aviv, Israel 
March 30,
2005
**Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 8 April 2008 – Cyprus v Commission**

**(Joined Cases T-54/08 R, T-87/08 R, T-88/08 R and T-91/08 R to T-93/08 R)**

Applications for interim relief – Procurement notices for contracts to encourage economic development in the northern part of Cyprus – Applications for suspension of operation of the notices – No urgency

1.                     *Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Prima
facie case – Urgency – Cumulative nature – Balancing of all the interests involved (Arts 242 EC and 243 EC; Rules of Procedure
of the Court of First Instance, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 21-22)*

2.                     *Applications for interim measures – Conditions of admissibility – Admissibility of main application – Irrelevance – Limits
(Arts 242 EC and 243 EC; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 104(1)) (see paras 50-51)*

3.                     *Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Serious
and irreparable damage – Damage capable of being relied on by a Member State (Arts 242 EC and 243 EC; Rules of Procedure of
the Court Instance, Art. 104(2)) (see para. 53)*

4.                     *Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Serious
and irreparable damage – Contested measure infringing a superior rule of law – Condition not automatically fulfilled – Burden
of proof (Arts 242 EC and 243 EC; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 58-59)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for suspension of the operation of a number of procurement notices issued by the Commission for the encouragement of economic development in the northern part of Cyprus, in the fields of energy, the environment, agriculture, telecommunications, education and crop management and irrigation. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Joins Cases T-54/08 R, T-87/08 R, T-88/08 R and T-91/08 R to T‐93/08 R for the purposes of this order; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Dismisses the applications for interim relief; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Reserves the costs. |
Jusfl 1 u f ::::,/ 

5440 South Lakeshore Drive, Suite 102, Tempe, Arizona, 85283 

May 29,2015 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

REF: DOT/FAA Amendment to Current Exemption #11404 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 ("Reform 

Act") and 14 CFR Part 11, Just 1 UAV, ("Petitioner"), for the purpose of creating a UAV 

educational and pilot training program, hereby applies for an exemption from Federal Aviation 

Regulations ("F ARs") identified below, to allow commercial operation of small unmanned aerial 

systems ("sUAS") so long as such operations are conducted within an under the conditions 

outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333.1 

We are requesting an amendment to our existing granted exemption #11404. Just 1 

UAV's original exemption was granted for the use of the Dn Phantom 2 Vision Plus. Since that 

time Just 1 UAV has become a certified Dn dealer. We would like the ability to conduct flight 

training and education for all current and future Dn UAV models weighting Jess than 55lbs. We 

therefore request an amendment to our current exemption #11404. 

Respectfully, 

..)'6 rj-;:J {/;~ ~ /! 

Gary North 

CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER 

Just 1 UAV LLC 

gnorth@Just1UAV.com 

www.JustlUAV.com 

Office: 480.459.5922 

Direct: 916.749.9120