alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Map Created: March 2014

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2011

Per Capita Market Income Rates in Appalachia, 2011

(County Rates)

Per capita market income is a measure of an area's total 

personal income, less transfer payments, divided by the resident 

population of the area. The map uses natural breaks in the 

distribution to organize the data into groups of common values. 

0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

$10,128 - $18,526

$18,527 - $23,606

$23,607 - $29,740

$29,741 - $41,280

Per Capita Market Income

U.S. average = $34,894

Appalachian average = $26,356

(Natural Breaks Classification)
#### Florida East Coast Railway Company, a Corporation, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. Nils Johnson, *Defendant in Error.*

Opinion filed Nov. 23, 1915.

The statutes changing the rule of evidence as to the burden of proof and making contributory negligence a partial defence, confined to railroad companies, are applicable only to injuries caused by the running of locomotives or cars or other machinery by employees or servants engaged in that service, and will not be extended to apply to injuries done in the baggage room by improperly piling up trunks.

Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Duval County; Geo. Cooper Gibbs, Judge.

Judgment reversed.

*Joim E.*and *Julian, Hartridge,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*423
      *R..P. Daniel, Jr.,*and *Luden, H. Boggs,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This is the second appearance here of this case, see Johnson v. Florida East Coast R. Co., 66 Fla. 415, 63 South. Rep. 713, where we sustained a demurrer to a plea interposed by the railway company.

The action is based upon an alleged negligence of the defendant company, in so carelessly piling up the trunks on its platform as to cause one to fall upon the plaintiff while he was there rightfully as a passenger looking for his own baggage.

The only assignments of error we deem necessary to discuss are based upon the court’s submitting to the jury the statutory presumption against the railway company, and making contributory negligence of the plaintiff but a partial defense. That these assignments are well taken, we think, is settled by our opinion in Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. McCormick, 59 Fla. 121, 52 South. Rep. 712.

We there held that these discriminatory statutes must 'be confined strictly to the operation of the railroad, in so far as it differs from other businesses in the particular dangers involved. We refused there to apply the statutes to an injury caused by a defective floor in the waiting room, and must also refuse to' apply the statutes to an injury done on the baggage platform.

It is not altogether clear what the statute means *in*changing the ordinary burden of proof so as to make the harsher rule applicable to all “damage done by any person in the employ or service of such company/’ but in view of the constitutional limitations upon legislation, we are of the opinion that we must apply the maxim *nosdtur a sociis*and construe the words with reference to what *424precedes, and therefore hold that the employment or service mentioned is confined to that of running the locomotives, cars or similar machinery.

We find no such variance between pleading and proof as to call for comment.

The judgment is reversed.

Taylor, C. J., and Shackleford, Cockrell, Whitfield and Ellis, JJ., concur.
Order entered August 4, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00187-CR

BRENDAN POTTER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-82314-2020

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s August 2, 2022 motion for access to the 

appellate record. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellate counsel Hugh 

Alexander Fuller to provide appellant with paper copies of the clerk’s and 

reporter’s records in the above case. We further ORDER appellate counsel to 

provide this Court, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, with written 

verification that the record has been sent to appellant.

Appellant’s pro se response is due by October 7, 2022.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Tom 

Nowak, Presiding Judge, 366th Judicial District Court; Hugh Alexander Fuller; 

and the Collin County District Attorney’s Office.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to 

Brendan Potter, TDCJ# 02393447, John Middleton Unit, 13055 FM 3522, Abilene, 

TX 79601.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 10.12





                           Memorandum of Understanding



This  memorandum  of  understanding  dated  March 15,  2004 is the result of the
meetings  held in  February  and March  2004  between  Geely in China and Global
Electric.  Both  English  and  Chinese  versions  of this  memorandum  are to be
considered upon agreement

Global  Electric had purchased  three models of scooters and  motorbikes and one
model of an All-Terrain Vehicle (ATV), totaling 10 vehicles with an intention of
purchasing 10 more units.

Global  Electric  will convert  these  vehicles  into  electric  versions.  Upon
successful conversion, Geely will manufacture these models as 'gliders', without
engine and exhaust for ease of conversion, at a pre-agreed price.

Geely will also work towards a comprehensive joint venture agreement in a format
agreed upon by both companies and details acceptable to both pasties.

/s/ Holly Roseberry                                  /s/ Carlos Zhu
-----------------------                     ---------------------------
Holly Roseberry                             Carlos Zhu
President                                   Vice General manager
Global Electric                             Shanghai Geely Metop International
                                            Trade Co., Ltd.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IVI Communications, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: February 14, 2005            /s/ Charles Roodenburg
                                   ----------------------
                                   Charles Roodenburg, Chief Financial Officer
#### Hugo PRINCZ, Appellee, v. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, Appellant.

Nos. 92-7247, 93-7006.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

April 14, 1993.

Before: WALD and RUTH BADER GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellee’s motion to dismiss, the opposition thereto, appel-lee’s motion to .exceed page limitations and the reply to the opposition to the motion to dismiss; appellant’s emergency motion for stay, the opposition thereto and appellee’s cross-motion for summary affirmance, and the reply; it is

ORDERED that the appellee’s unopposed motion to exceed page limitations be granted. The Clerk is directed to file the lodged document. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s motion to dismiss be denied. A district court’s denial of a foreign state’s motion to dismiss on grounds of sovereign immunity is immediately appealable. *See Foremost-McKesson v. Islamic Republic of Iran,*905 F.2d 438, 443 (D.C.Cir.1990). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellant’s emergency motion for stay of all proceedings in the district court be denied as unnecessary. Because an appeal ‘ properly pursued from the district court’s • order divests the district court of control over those aspects of the case on appeal, *see Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.,*459 U.S. 56, 58, 103 S.Ct. 400, 402, 74 L.Ed.2d 225 (1982) *(per curiam)*(“The filing of a notice of appeal is an event of jurisdictional significance — it confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.”); *Apostol v. Gallion,*870 F.2d 1335 (7th Cir.1989) (appeal from denial .of claims of qualified immunity divested district court of jurisdiction), exclusive jurisdiction to resolve the threshold issue this case presents vests in this court, and the district court may not proceed to trial until the appeal is resolved. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s cross-motion for summary affirmance be denied. The merits of the parties’ positions are not so clear as to warrant summary action. *See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley,*819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) *(per curiam); Walker v. Washington,*627 F.2d 541, *2545 (D.C.Cir.) *(per curiam), cert. denied,*449 U.S. 994, 101 S.Ct. 532, 66 L.Ed.2d 292 (1980).
BASE SALARIES OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY



 Exhibit 10.28 
  
 BASE SALARIES OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY 
  
 As of April 4, 2005, the following are the base salaries (on an annual basis) of the executive officers of BJ’s
Wholesale Club, Inc.: 
  

				
	 Name and Title

	  	Base Salary


	 Michael T. Wedge
 President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	800,000
		
	 Herbert J. Zarkin
 Chairman of the Board
	  	$	525,000
		
	 Frank D. Forward
 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	395,000
		
	 Edward F. Giles
 Executive Vice President, Club Operations
	  	$	350,000
		
	 Karen Stout
 Executive Vice President, Merchandising
	  	$	375,000
		
	 Kellye L. Walker
 Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
	  	$	225,000
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. ALONSO GRADO, a/k/a Lonsie, Defendant

- Appellant. No. 20

- 2009 (D.C. No. 2:18

- CR

- 01254

- RB

- 1) (D. N.M.)

_________________________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

_________________________________ Before TYMKOVICH , Chief Judge, BACHARACH and CARSON , Circuit Judges.

_________________________________ Alonso Grado pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, distribution of methamphetamine, and use of a communication facility to further the commission of a drug t rafficking crime. He was sentenced to serve 180 months in prison. Although his plea agreement contained a waiver of his appellate rights, he filed a notice of appeal. The government has moved to enforce the appeal waiver in the plea agreement pursuant t o United States v. Hahn , 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam).

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1

. F ILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### August 3, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court2 Under Hahn , we consider “(1) whether the disputed appeal falls within the scope of the waiver of appellate rights; (2) whether the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his appellate rights; and (3) whether enforcing the waiver would result in a miscarriage of justice.” Id . at 1325 . The government asserts that all of the Hahn conditions have been satisfied because: (1) Mr. Grado’s appeal is within the scope of the appe al waiver; (2) he knowingly and voluntarily waived his appellate rights; and (3) enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice. In response to the government’s motion, Mr. Grado concedes his appeal waiver is enforceable under the stan dard set forth in Hahn . Based on this concession and our independent review of the record, we grant the government’s motion to enforce the appeal waiver and dismiss the appeal. This dismissal does not affect
Mr. Grado’s right to pursue post

- conviction re lief on the grounds permitted in his plea agreement.

Entered for the Court Per Curiam
#### McLEAN-ARKANSAS LUMBER COMPANY, a Corporation, and Fred Zorn, Appellants, v. Fred CLOUD.

No. 11603.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Oct. 16, 1939.

Bradley & Patten, Of Little Rock, Ark., for appellants.

Donham & Fulk, of Little Rode, Ark., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal, 28 F.Supp. 623, docketed and dismissed at costs of appellant, per stipulation of parties and certificate of clerk of District Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1993-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         61,187
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  52,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,638
<PP&E>                                         6,038,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,903,066)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,248,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,074
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,243,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,248,652
<SALES>                                        174,374
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               175,727
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  97,854<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,080)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,080)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,080)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0

<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation and
amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and interest expense.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. §1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Lawson Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 29, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert G. Barbieri, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | /s/ROBERT G. BARBIERIRobert G. Barbieri Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | April 12, 2004                                                                              

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Lawson Software, Inc. and will be retained by Lawson Software, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.25
                                                                 Lease Agreement
Party A: Liu Gui Zhi

Party B: Beijing China Cardinal Real Estate Consulting Ltd,

Both Parties entered into this agreement based on friendly consultation.

1. Party A leases the room, 8B,8th Floor, Century Golden Resources Business
Center to Party B during the period from Jun 1, 2004 to Dec. 31, 2005.

2. The rent is 3.5 Yuan/m2/day, namely,14,000yuan per month. Total area is
133.45 m2. Party A should pay the rent of 266,000 yuan of 19 months before May.
31, 2005.

3. Heating fees, water fees, electricity fees, communication fees, CATV fees are
the responsibility of Party B.

4. Party B guarantees not to destroy the equipment of the room. Party B can't
sublease to any third party. Party B can't make hold to change the structure of
the room and change the use of the room. If it is necessary to change, then must
obtain Party A's permission. If not, Party A has right to ask 1000 yuan.

5. Party B guarantees to only perform legally permissible work on the premises.

6. In the rent period, both parties couldn't ending this agreement ad arbitrium.
If Party A want to take back the room, must inform Party B in written advance
one month. If party B want to ending this agreement, must apply to Party A in
written advance one month.

7. This contract is executed in duplicate with each party holding one copy. This
contract is effective upon execution by both parties.

/S/ LIU GUI ZHI           /s/ BEIJING CHINA CARDINAL REAL ESTATE CONSULTING LTD.
Party A                   Party B


May, 30, 2004
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**

 

Royale Coach by Monaco, Inc., anIndiana Corporation.

 

MCC Acquisition Corporation, aDelaware Corporation.

 

Harney County Operations, Inc., anOregon Corporation.

 

Outdoor Resorts of Las Vegas, Inc., aNevada Corporation.

 

Outdoor Resorts of Naples, Inc., aFlorida Corporation.

 

Outdoor Resorts Motorcoach CountryClub, Inc., a California Corporation.

 

R-Vision Holdings LLC, a DelawareLimited Liability Company.

 

R-Vision, Inc., an IndianaCorporation.

 

R-Vision Motorized, LLC, an IndianaLimited Liability Company

 

Roadmaster LLC, an Indiana LimitedLiability Company.

 

Bison Manufacturing, LLC, an IndianaLimited Liability Company.

 

----
Wyoming Nitrate Contribution to Lostwood Worst

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total LOST1 2002 plan02c36k PN3 24 WY 0.0405042 4.58E-05 0.02745 0.0018125 0.0084167 0.0782292 Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Worst) to Nitrat e at Lostwood = 0.08 divided by 2.8, or 3% Best

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total LOST1 2002 plan02c36k PN3 23 WY 0.0104783 3.04E-05 0.0070913 0.0006435 0.0029739 0.0212174 Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Best) to Nitrate at Lostwood = 0.02 divided by 1, or 2%
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 10, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 1636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00269]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE


Notice Regarding Board of Directors Meetings

AGENCY: United States Institute of Peace (USIP) and Endowment of the 
United States Institute of Peace.

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: USIP announces the next meeting of the Board of Directors.

DATES: Friday, January 19, 2024 (9 a.m.-12:30 p.m.).
    The next meeting of the Board of Directors will be held April 19, 
2024.

ADDRESSES: 2301 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20037.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Corinne Graff, 202-429-7895, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e98a8e9b888f8fa99c9a8099c7869b8e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1c7f7b6e7d7a7a5c696f756c32736e7b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Open Session--Portions may be closed 
pursuant to subsection (c) of section 552b of title 5, United States 
Code, as provided in subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States 
Institute of Peace Act, Public Law 98-525.
    Authority: 22 U.S.C. 4605(h)(3).

    Dated: January 4, 2023.
Rebecca Fernandes,
Director of Accounting.
[FR Doc. 2024-00269 Filed 1-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2810-03-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# San Joaquin Valley**~** 

# rr AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

# HEALTHYAlrR LIVINGm

September 13, 2011 Mr. Mike Guzzetta, Manager Rule Evaluations Section CaliforniaAir Resources Board P.O. Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 95812 Dear Mr. Guzzetta: Attached is the Rule Action Packagefor Rule 4566 (Organic Material Composting Operations), which was adopted bythe San Joaquin ValleyAir Pollution Control District Governing Board on August 18, 2011. We request thatthe California Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit Rule 4566 and the appropriate documentationtothe United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. Included with this Rule Action Package are the following attachments: 1. ARB SIP Completeness Checklist 2. ARB APCD/AQMD Rule Evaluation Form 3. Clean Copy of Rule 4566 4. Referenced Rules 5. Evidence of Public Hearing 6. Governing Board Resolution 7. Governing Board Memo 8. Staff Reportwith appendices, including Public Comments and District Responses. The Rule Action Package is being transmitted bye-mailto ARB staff. Ifyou have any questions, please contact Koshoua Thao at (559) 230-5822 or bye-mail at koshoua.thao@valleyair.org

. The Districtthanks you and your stafffor your assistance.

# <~ Director ofStrategies and Incentives Attachments Seyed Sadredin Executive Director/Air Pollution Control Officer

Northern Region Central Region [Main Office) Southern Region 4800 Enterprise Way 1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue 34946 Flyover Court Modesto. CA 95356·8718 Fresno. CA 93726·0244 Bakersfield. CA 93308·9725 Tel: 1209) 557·6400 FAX: [209) 557·6475. Tel: [559) 230·6000 FAX: 1559) 230·6061 Tel: 661·392·5500 FAX: 661·392·5585 www.valleyair.org www.healthyairliving.com Printedonrecycledpaper.