alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Counties in Bold Contain Distressed Areas

County Economic Status and Number of Distressed Areas in 

Appalachian North Carolina, Fiscal Year 2021

County Status

Economic

Areas

Distressed

Number of

Alexander Transitional

Alleghany At-Risk 2

Ashe Transitional 2

Avery Transitional

Buncombe Competitive

Burke Transitional 4

Caldwell Transitional 3

Cherokee At-Risk

Clay At-Risk

Davie Transitional

Forsyth Transitional 28

Graham At-Risk 1

Haywood Transitional 1

Henderson Transitional

Jackson At-Risk

McDowell Transitional

Macon Transitional 2

Madison Transitional 1

Mitchell Transitional

Polk Transitional

Rutherford At-Risk 2

Stokes Transitional

Surry Transitional 2

Swain Transitional 1

Transylvania Transitional 1

Watauga At-Risk 1

Wilkes Transitional 5

Yadkin Transitional 1

Yancey Transitional 1

Appalachian Regional Commission, June 2020
Distressed Areas in Appalachian North Carolina, 

Fiscal Year 2021

County

Census Tract 

ID Number County

Census Tract 

ID Number

Alleghany 9501

Alleghany 9502

Ashe 9703

Ashe 9705

Burke 201

Burke 212.01

Burke 213.02

Burke 214

Caldwell 301

Caldwell 302

Caldwell 303

Forsyth 3.01

Forsyth 3.02

Forsyth 4

Forsyth 5

Forsyth 6

Forsyth 7

Forsyth 8.01

Forsyth 8.02

Forsyth 9

Forsyth 10

Forsyth 14

Forsyth 15

Forsyth 16.02

Forsyth 17

Forsyth 18

Forsyth 19.01

Forsyth 19.02

Forsyth 20.01

Forsyth 20.02

Forsyth 27.01

Forsyth 27.02

Forsyth 27.03

Forsyth 29.03

Forsyth 34.03

Forsyth 34.04

Forsyth 35

Forsyth 37.01

Forsyth 39.03

Graham 9203

Haywood 9209

Macon 9702

Macon 9703.01

Madison 102

Rutherford 9608

Rutherford 9609

Surry 9304

Surry 9310.03

Swain 9603.01

Transylvania 9601

Watauga 9205

Wilkes 9602

Wilkes 9603

Wilkes 9606

Wilkes 9607

Wilkes 9608.01

Yadkin 503

Yancey 9601.02

Appalachian Regional Commission, June 2020
WILKES

SWAIN

ASHE SURRY

BURKE

MACON

STOKES

BUNCOMBE

HAYWOOD

JACKSON

MADISON

DAVIE

YADKIN

POLK

CALDWELL

FORSYTH

CLAY

CHEROKEE

RUTHERFORD

YANCEY

AVERY

MCDOWELL

GRAHAM

WATAUGA

HENDERSON

TRANSYLVANIA

ALLEGHANY

MITCHELL

ALEXANDER

0 25 50

Miles

Levels of

Economic Status

Distressed County

At-Risk County

Transitional County

Competitive County

Attainment County

County Economic Status in Appalachian North Carolina,

Fiscal Year 2021
WILKES

SURRY

SWAIN

BURKE

ASHE

MACON

STOKES

BUNCOMBE

JACKSON

HAYWOOD

CALDWELL

FORSYTH

POLK

RUTHERFORD

MADISON

YADKIN

CLAY

CHEROKEE

DAVIE

MCDOWELL

AVERY

YANCEY

GRAHAM

WATAUGA

HENDERSON

TRANSYLVANIA

MITCHELL

ALEXANDER

ALLEGHANY

N C 

County Economic Status and Distressed Areas in

Appalachian North Carolina, Fiscal Year 2021

S C G A 

T N 

V A 

Levels of 

Economic Status

Distressed County

At-Risk County

Distressed Area

Transitional County

Distressed Area

Competitive County

Attainment County

0 15 30

Miles
On-board Circulation and Seating Subcommittee Call (#11)

12/11/2014

U.S. Access Board: Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee

1. Introductions

1. Approval of the Agenda

2. Next Meeting

3. Review and discuss the photo document provided by Ken Shiotani

4. Refer to the photo documents provided by Long Island RR of the C3, M3 and M7 

commuter cars for discussion on clear space at entrances (6b) and handholds (6c)

5. Review and discuss revisions to matrix

a. note 6b. 

b. note 6c

c. note 22

6. Next Step(s):

a. Draft report to the full committee: Volunteers?

7. Action Items

8. Assignments

9. Deadlines

[Attachments]
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                       LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF BELDEN INC.

<TABLE>
<S>                                      <C>
Belden Inc.                              (Incorporated in Delaware)

Belden Wire & Cable Company              (Incorporated in Delaware)

Belden Technologies, Inc.                (Incorporated in Delaware)

Belden Insurance Company                 (Incorporated in Vermont)

Belden International, Inc.               (Incorporated in Delaware)

Belden Holdings, Inc.                    (Incorporated in Delaware)

Belden Communications Company            (Incorporated in Delaware)

Belden Communications Holding, Inc.      (Incorporated in Delaware)

Belden Europe B.V.                       (Incorporated in The Netherlands)

Belden Wire & Cable B.V.                 (Incorporated in The Netherlands)

Belden International Holdings B.V.       (Incorporated in The Netherlands)

Belden Europe B.V. & Belden Wire &       (German Civil Code Partnership)
Cable B.V. Finance GbR

Belden Deutschland GmbH                  (Incorporated in Germany)

Belden Electronics GmbH                  (Incorporated in Germany)

Belden-EIW GmbH & Co. KG                 (German Limited Partnership)

Belden Netherlands B.V.                  (Incorporated in The Netherlands)

Belden Australia Pty Ltd.                (Incorporated in Australia)

Belden Superannuation Pty. Ltd.          (Incorporated in Australia)

Belden Foreign Sales Corporation         (Incorporated in Barbados)

Belden-Duna Kabel Kft.                   (Incorporated in Hungary)

Belden Electronics Argentina S.A.        (Incorporated in Argentina)

Belden (Canada) Inc.                     (Incorporated in Canada)

Belden (Canada) Finco Limited
Partnership                              (Canadian Limited Partnership)

Belden Electronics S.a.r.l.              (Incorporated in France)

Belden (UK) Finco Limited Partnership    (United Kingdom Limited Partnership)
</TABLE>

                                                                               1
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<S>                                      <C>
Belden (Bermuda) Finance Ltd.            (Incorporated in Bermuda)

Belden UK Limited                        (Incorporated in the United Kingdom)

Belden Electronics, S.A. de C.V.         (Incorporated in Mexico)

Belden Brasil Comercial Ltda.            (Incorporated in Brazil)

Belden -Dorfler GmbH                     (Incorporated in Austria)
</TABLE>

                                                                               2
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4960 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 511 East Walnut Street in Columbia, Missouri, as the ‘‘Spc. Sterling William Wyatt Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4960 EH

1 SECTION 1. SPC. STERLING WILLIAM WYATT POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 511 East Walnut Street in Co5 lumbia, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Spc. Sterling William Wyatt Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Spc. Sterling William 

11 Wyatt Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4960 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postliam Wyatt Post Office Building’’. Columbia, Missouri, as the ‘‘Spc. Sterling Wil- al Service located at 511 East Walnut Street in
# C_2008285EN.01005502.xml

| 8.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/55

---

Action brought on 6 August 2008 — Visser-Fornt Raya v Europol

(Case F-67/08)

(2008/C 285/99)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Maria Teresa Visser-Fornt Raya (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: P. Casparis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of 4 October 2007 by which Europol informed the applicant that there was no possibility of offering her a permanent post

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 4 October 2007 by which the defendant informed the applicant that there was no possibility of offering her a permanent post, the decision of 29 April 2008 rejecting the complaint against the earlier decision and the decision of 12 June 2008, which follows on from that of 4 October 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 4 October 2007 by which the defendant informed the applicant that there was no possibility of offering her a permanent post, the decision of 29 April 2008 rejecting the complaint against the earlier decision and the decision of 12 June 2008, which follows on from that of 4 October 2007;

| — | Order Europol to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order Europol to pay the costs.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00194-CV

IN RE JOHN EVAN JOHNSON RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that the petition should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DELIVERED: May 25, 2012

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
# C_2008158EN.01001902.xml

| 21.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/19

---

Action brought on 17 April 2008 — Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll v OHIM — Redrock Construction (REDROCK)

(Case T-146/08)

(2008/C 158/32)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll GmbH & Co. OHG (Gladbeck, Germany) (represented by: S. Beckmann, Rechstanwältin)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Redrock Construction s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the defendant's decision of 18 February 2008 in Case R 506/2007-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the defendant's decision of 18 February 2008 in Case R 506/2007-4;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Redrock Construction s.r.o

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘REDROCK’ for goods and services in classes 1, 2, 17, 19, 36 and 37 (application No 3 866 365).

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: German word mark ‘Rock’ for goods and services in classes 1, 6-8, 17, 19, 37 and 42 (No 302 29 274); the opposition concerns registration in all classes with the exception of class 36.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition allowed and application refused in part.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Contested decision annulled and opposition rejected.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), as there is a likelihood of confusion, or at least a likelihood of association, between the opposing marks.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
Exhibit 10.20
 EXECUTIVE OFFICER W/O EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 ULTRATECH, INC.  GRANT AGREEMENT
 WITNESSETH
 RECITALS
   NOW, THEREFORE
 Grant of Option .
 Option Term .
 Limited Transferability .




---



##### 



Dates of Exercise .
   Cessation of Service .
   earlier
  2




---



##### 



Service
 Employee
  3




---



##### 



permanently disabled permanent disability
 subsidiary
 parent
 involuntary termination
 Employment agreement
 Corporate Transaction .
     4




---



##### 



provided
  5




---



##### 



Adjustment in Option Shares .
 Privilege of Stock Ownership .
 Manner of Exercising Option .
       6




---



##### 



Governing Law .
  7




---



##### 



Compliance with Laws and Regulations .
 Successors and Assigns .
 Liability of Corporation .
   Employment/Service At Will .
 Notices .
 Construction .
  8




---



##### 



Additional Terms Applicable to an Incentive Stock Option .
     9




---



##### 



Additional Terms Applicable to a Non-Statutory Stock Option .
 Leave of Absence
      10




---



##### 



11




---



##### 



EXHIBIT I
 NOTICE OF EXERCISE OF STOCK OPTION
   
 OptioneeAddress:Print name in exact manner it is to appear on the stock certificate:Address to which certificate is to be sent, if different from address above:Social Security Number:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1568-E1569]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 CELEBRATING THE 101ST ANNIVERSARY OF DOUBLE TEN DAY FOR THE PEOPLE OF 
                                 TAIWAN

                                 ______
                                 

                       HON. MADELEINE Z. BORDALLO

                                of guam

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 19, 2012

  Ms. BORDALLO. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to congratulate the people of 
Taiwan on the upcoming celebration of the 101st anniversary of ``Double 
Ten Day.'' Double Ten Day traces its roots to the Wuchang Uprising that 
occurred on October 10, 1911. The Wuchang Uprising signaled the end of 
the Qing Dynasty and the start of a democratic movement that we 
continue to celebrate and recognize. Double Ten Day is a celebration of 
the birth of democracy and the Republic of China.
  I want to especially recognize the people of Taiwan on this important 
occasion. The strength of the relationship between the people of Taiwan 
and the people of the United States is strong and this is evidenced by 
the expansion of the U.S. visa waiver program to include Taiwan. 
Inclusion of Taiwan in the U.S. visa waiver program is a significant 
development in the relationship between both countries. This 
announcement will help to expand business opportunities as well as 
deepen our mutual appreciation for each other's unique cultures. 
Exchange of our cultures is clearly evidenced on Guam, which is home to 
many people of Chinese ancestry. Guam continues to benefit from their 
cultural contributions to our community and the promotion of trade and 
economic opportunities. I congratulate the people of Taiwan on the 
101st anniversary of Double Ten Day. We celebrate this historic 
occasion with them and we honor their friendship with the American 
people.

[[Page E1569]]

                          ____________________
```
Frankly
Inc.


333
Bryant Street, Suite 240


San
Francisco, CA 94107


 


December
20, 2016


 


Mr.
Pat LaPlatney


Raycom
Media, Inc.


RSA
Tower


201
Monroe Street, 20th Floor


Montgomery,
AL 36104


 


Re: Frankly
Credit Agreement


 


Dear
Pat,


 


Reference
is made to the Credit Agreement between Raycom Media, Inc. (“Raycom”) and Frankly Inc. (“Frankly”) dated
August 31, 2016 (the “Credit Agreement”). Section 4.3.2.3 of the Credit Agreement requires mandatory payment to Raycom
of the net proceeds received by Frankly from any “issuances of debt or equity.” Sections 4.3.2.4 and 4.3.2.5 of the
Credit Agreement provide for mandatory repayment to Raycom of specific amounts, based upon the amount of capital raised in connection
with a NASDAQ listing. Frankly anticipates (a) closing a private placement of equity in December of 2016, (b) closing a revolving
credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank in December of 2016, and (c) making a US public offering of equity on or about the date
that its pending S-1 Registration Statement and NASDAQ listing application become effective. Raycom and Frankly agree that the
proceeds received by Frankly from the financings listed in (a) and (b) above (and (c) above to the extent that the amount raised
is less than US$8 million) will not be subject to Section 4.3.2.3 of the Credit Agreement, provided that nothing herein will modify
the operation of Sections 4.3.2.4 and 4.3.2.5 of the Credit Agreement.


 


Reference
is also made to the Share Purchase Agreement between Raycom and Frankly dated August 31, 2017 (“the Share Purchase Agreement”).
At the time the Share Purchase Agreement was entered, Frankly’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) consisted of
four members. Section 4.2.1 of the Share Purchase Agreement required Frankly to enlarge the Board to seven members within 90 days
following the Closing Date of the Share Purchase Agreement, subject to shareholder approval. On October 3, 2016, the Board was
enlarged to five members. The parties agree that the 90 day period set forth in Section 4.2.1 of the Share Purchase Agreement
for enlargement of the Board to seven members is hereby deleted and the Frankly will, subject to shareholder approval, cause the
Board to be enlarged to seven members by the earlier of (a) 45 days following the effective date of Frankly’s pending S-1
Registration Statement, or (b) April 15, 2017.


 


If
the foregoing is acceptable, please return a signed copy to us at your earliest convenience.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	Frankly
    Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Steve     Chung
	 	Name:
    	Steve
    Chung
	 	Title:
    	Chief
    Financial Officer


 


Accepted
and Agreed:


 


Raycom
Media, Inc.


 


	By:	/s/
    Pat LaPlatney	 
	Name:
    	Pat
    LaPlatney	 
	Title:
    	Chief
    Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Forms S-3 (No. 333-49271, No. 333-49271-01 and No. 333-78127) and
Forms S-8 (No. 333-39794, No. 333-29643 and No. 333-29647) of Philadelphia
Consolidated Holding Corp. of our reports dated February 8, 2002 relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules, which
appear in this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, PA
March 25, 2002
A poverty rate is the ratio of the persons below the poverty level 

to the total number of persons for whom poverty status has been 

determined. The map uses natural breaks in the distribution to 

organize the data into groups of common values. 

Map Created: July 2018

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2012–2016

Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016

(County Rates)

0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

28.6% - 42.5%

21.3% - 28.5%

15.7% - 21.2%

6.4% - 15.6%

Poverty Rate

(Natural Breaks Classification)

U.S. average = 15.1%

Appalachian average = 16.7%
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Behavioral and Social Research on Immigration and Aging.                    

*Date:*                         March 7-8, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Carmen Moten, Ph.D., M.P.H.,  Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7703,                         *cmoten@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 28, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-28955 Filed 1-3-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Thomas P. Scheer et al., Respondents, v Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Appellant.

— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court was without power to compel defendant to participate in the appraisal procedure contained in the fire insurance policy it issued to plaintiffs *641(see, *Happy Hank Auction Co. v American Eagle Fire Ins. Co.,*1 NY2d 534, 538; *Matter of Delmar Box Co. [Aetna Ins. Co.],*309 NY 60, 63-67; *Syracuse Sav. Bank v Yorkshire Ins. Co.,*301 NY 403, 410-411). Plaintiffs’ reliance on Insurance Law § 3404 (g) is misplaced. That statute became effective on March 23, 1990, after the dates of the parties’ contract and plaintiffs’ loss. Because that statute purports to create a substantive right and because its language indicates a prospective application only, Insurance Law § 3404 (g) has no application here *(see, Matter of Deutsch v Catherwood,*31 NY2d 487, 489-490; *see also, Matter of Thomas v Bethlehem Steel Corp.,*63 NY2d 150, 154; *Waddey v Waddey,*290 NY 251, 254; McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes § 52). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hayes, J.— Declaratory Judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Den-man, Green and Lowery, JJ.