alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Beatrice ADAMS et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The CITY OF McALESTER, a municipal corporation, Defendant in Error.

No. 36604.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 19, 1955.

*727Hulsey & Hulsey, W. J. Hulsey, Lena Hulsey, McAlester, for plaintiffs in error.

Walter J. Arnote, City Atty, McAlester, for defendant in error.

WILLLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice.

By this action, three property owners, as plaintiffs, seek to enjoin the City of McAlester, as defendant, from proceeding further in the improvement of a certain city street therein and from issuing special improvement bonds and from levying special improvement tax assessments against -plaintiffs’ property to pay for the same. Defendant moved to dismiss the action on the ground it was res judicata and also because barred by the statute of limitations. The .trial court sustained the motion and dismissed the action and plaintiffs .app.eal. . , . ,

The record- reveals that plaintiffs here were also parties .plaintiff in the case of Riedt v. City of McAlester, Okl., 262 P.2d 152, .decided by... this court on October 13, 1953. The subject matter of that case was the same as the subject matter of the case at bar. The only differences between the Riedt case and the case at bar are that 14 of the parties plaintiff in the Riedt case did not join in the case at bar and that the Riedt case was filed on October 17, 1951, whereas the case at bar was filed on March 11, 1954.

Plaintiffs assert that the Riedt case is not res judicata because the judgment therein was on a question of limitation only and not on the merits. It is true that the' Riedt case was held to be barred by the statute of limitations because not-filed within the 15 day period provided by 11 O.S.1951 §§ 85 and 86, but just what comfort plaintiffs derive from such fact we are unable to perceive. It appears obvious that if the petition filed in the Riedt case on October 17, 1951, was barred by limitations, certainly a petition alleging the same cause of action filed by the same .parties against the same defendant some two and one-half years later would likewise be barred by limitations.

We deem no further discussion of the merits of the case necessary.

Judgment affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WELCH, CORN, DAVISON, HALLEY and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur.
# C_2010179EN.01005701.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/57

---

Order of the General Court of 11 May 2010 — Shetland Islands Council v Commission

(Case T-43/08) (1)

(2010/C 179/97)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4851 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                        March 22, 2018.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
4851) entitled ``An Act to establish the Kennedy-King National 
Commemorative Site in the State of Indiana, and for other purposes.'', 
do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            In section 3, strike subsection (d).

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 4851

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
Per capita market income is a measure of an area's total 

personal income, less transfer payments, divided by the 

resident population of the area. The percent of the U.S. 

average is computed by dividing the county per capita 

market income by the national average and multiplying by 

100. The map uses critical breaks such as the national 

average to organize the data into groups of common values.

Map Created: March 2015

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2013

Relative Per Capita Market Income Rates in Appalachia, 2013

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

28.9% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.9%

100.0% - 118.8%

Percent of the U.S. Average 

U.S. average = $37,127

Appalachian average = $27,979

(Critical Breaks Classification)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H6073-H6074]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS

  (Mr. KUCINICH asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, in 1992, the Food and Drug Administration 
decided that genetically modified organisms were the functional 
equivalent of conventional foods.
  They arrived at this decision without testing GMOs for allergenicity, 
toxicity, antibiotic resistance, and functional characteristics. As a 
result, hundreds of millions of acres of GMO crops were planted in 
America without the knowledge or consent of the American people, no 
safety testing, no long-term health studies.
  The FDA has received over a million comments from citizens demanding 
labeling of GMOs. Ninety percent of Americans agree.
  Why no labeling? I'll give you one reason. The influence and the 
corruption of the political process by Monsanto. Monsanto has been a 
prime mover in GMO technology, a multimillion dollar GMO lobby here and 
a major political contributor. There is a chance that Monsanto's grip 
will be

[[Page H6074]]

broken in California, where a GMO labeling initiative is on the ballot. 
Here in Congress my legislation, H.R. 3553, will provide for a national 
labeling bill.
  Americans have a right to know if their food is genetically 
engineered. It's time for labeling. It's time for people to know how 
their food is being produced.

                          ____________________
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Verdisys, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, John OKeefe, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|\s\ John OKeefe            
|----------------------------
|                            
|John OKeefe                
|Chief Financial Officer     
|Principal Accounting Officer
|                            
|May 24, 2004                

---
##### 



PHILADELPHIA INSURANCE COMPANIES
STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHT GRANT AGREEMENT
 THIS STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHT
   W I T N E S S E T H
 Grant
  Vesting Date
    
    Percent VestedFebruary 7, 2011
    
    100%




---



##### 



Legends
 Delivery of Shares
 - 2 -




---



##### 



Employment . Nothing in the Plan or in this Agreement shall confer upon
the Grantee any right to be continued as an employee of the Company or interfere in any way with
the right of the Company to remove the Grantee as an employee at any time for any cause.
 Binding Effect
 The Plan
  PHILADELPHIA CONSOLIDATED HOLDINGS CORP.By:
    
    James J. Maguire, Jr.ACKNOWLEDGEDSean S. SweeneyGRANTEE
 - 3 -
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Ian McKinnon and Isaac Moss, of Cheetah Oil & Gas Ltd., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Cheetah Oil & Gas Ltd. for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cheetah Oil & Gas Ltd. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated:  April 16, 2007

/s/ Ian McKinnon

Ian McKinnon, President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Isaac Moss

Isaac Moss

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cheetah Oil & Gas Ltd. and will be retained by Cheetah Oil & Gas Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

CW1094440.1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Green
Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 26, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence J. Blanford, as the
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

Date: November 25, 2009



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    LAWRENCE J.
BLANFORD          
|Lawrence J. Blanford*                
|President and Chief Executive Officer



|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and will be retained by Green
Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 46 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.46

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 
             study of Fort Ontario in the State of New York.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Fort Ontario Study Act''.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
    In this Act:
        (1) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of 
    the Interior.
        (2) Study area.--The term ``study area'' means Fort Ontario in 
    Oswego, New York.
SEC. 3. FORT ONTARIO SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a special resource 
study of the study area.
    (b) Contents.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall--
        (1) evaluate the national significance of the study area;
        (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of designating 
    the study area as a unit of the National Park System;
        (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, protection, 
    and interpretation of the study area by the Federal Government, 
    State or local government entities, or private and nonprofit 
    organizations;
        (4) consult with interested Federal agencies, State or local 
    governmental entities, private and nonprofit organizations, or any 
    other interested individuals; and
        (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal acquisition, 
    development, interpretation, operation, and maintenance associated 
    with the alternatives.
    (c) Applicable Law.--The study required under subsection (a) shall 
be conducted in accordance with section 100507 of title 54, United 
States Code.
    (d) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds 
are first made available to carry out the study under subsection (a), 
the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate a report that describes--
        (1) the results of the study; and
        (2) any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1609]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               COMMEMORATING TAIWAN'S COMMITMENT TO PEACE

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. DAVID RIVERA

                               of florida

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. RIVERA. Mr. Speaker, as a member of the House Foreign Affairs 
Committee, I rise today to draw attention to the increasing conflict in 
the East China Sea and to reiterate the necessity to remain involved in 
the region given the growing security threats and challenges to U.S. 
interests.
  In light of the latest controversies in the East China Sea and the 
Diaoyutai Islands, President Ma Ying-jeou of the Republic of China 
(Taiwan) proposed the East China Sea Peace Initiative in August 2012, 
which calls on the People's Republic of China, Japan, and Taiwan to 
resolve the Diaoyutai dispute peacefully.
  With respect to the Diaoyutai issue, the government of Taiwan has 
consistently affirmed its position of ``safeguarding sovereignty, 
shelving disputes, pursuing peace and reciprocity, and promoting joint 
exploration and development.''
  The Diaoyutai Islands are located in the East China Sea, which is an 
important air and sea transportation hub in the western Pacific, and 
therefore have clear significance for security and peace in the Asia-
Pacific region.
  In order to foster regional peace and stability, economic prosperity 
and the sustainable development of the marine environment, as well as 
to seek out a path to coexistence and mutual prosperity, the government 
of Taiwan proposes the East China Sea Peace Initiative and calls on all 
parties concerned to:
  1. Refrain from taking any antagonistic actions;
  2. Shelve controversies and not abandon dialogue;
  3. Observe international law and resolve disputes through peaceful 
means;
  4. Seek consensus on a code of conduct in the East China Sea;
  5. Establish a mechanism for cooperation on exploring and developing 
resources in the East China Sea.
  I believe we must stand with Taiwan, an ally that shares our values 
of freedom and democracy. I commend the peace initiative proposed by 
President Ma and recognize Taiwan government's efforts in promoting 
peace and stability in East Asia.

                          ____________________
```
A college completion rate is the percentage of persons ages 25 

and over with a bachelor’s degree or more. The map uses natural 

breaks in the distribution to organize the data into groups of 

common values. 

College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2011–2015

(County Rates)

Map Created: August 2017

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2011–2015

0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

5.1% - 14.3%

14.4% - 20.9%

21.0% - 31.3%

31.4% - 50.8%

U.S. average = 29.8%

Appalachian average = 22.6%

Completion Rate

(Natural Breaks Classification)
Exhibit 15.1














April 30, 2013





The Board of Directors and Shareholders


MCG Capital Corporation





We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-137565 and Form S-8 No. 333-167494) pertaining to the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation and the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Non- Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation of our report dated April 30, 2013 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements and schedules of MCG Capital Corporation included in its Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2013 .








/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
**Exhibit 10.20**
AETRIUM EXECUTIVE OFFICER PROFIT SHARING PROGRAM
     In 2004, our Compensation Committee authorized an Executive Officer Profit Sharing Program.The Executive Officer Profit Sharing Program is a cash-based quarterly incentive program designedto focus our executive officers’ attention on achieving quarterly profitability. Under theExecutive Officer Profit Sharing Program, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to award upto an aggregate of 10% of our pre-tax income (before such awards) for the quarter as cash bonusesto our executive officers based upon our profitability and cash flow for the quarter. TheCompensation Committee then determines individual executive bonuses after evaluating eachindividual executive’s contributions to the success of our operations for the quarter.
Exhibit 15.1














July 30, 2013





The Board of Directors and Shareholders


MCG Capital Corporation





We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-137565 and Form S-8 No. 333-167494) pertaining to the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation and the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Non- Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation of our report dated July 30, 2013 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements and schedules of MCG Capital Corporation that are included in its Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 .








/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
exh10-48.htm










Exhibit 10.48


 


Certification No.: 1657120


 


Utility Model Patent Certification


 


(Translation)


 







 


Name of the Utility Model:  Assembled Toy Plug-in Bricks


 


Inventor: Lin, Wei


 


Patent No.: ZL 2009 2 0292981.6


 


Application Date: December 16, 2009


 


Patent Owner: Lin, Wei


 


Date of Authorization Proclamation: January 12, 2011


 


This new utility model has been reviewed by our bureau staff in accordance with the Patent Law of the People’s Republic of China. We have decided to grant the patent right to this model, issue this certification and register for the Patent Registration Records. The patent right shall become effective from the date of authorization proclamation.


 


The term of this patent is 10 years, starting from the application date. The patent owner shall pay for the annual patent fee according to the Patent Law and Implementing Rules. The annual patent fee shall be paid by December 16 of each calendar year. In the circumstance that the annual payment is not made by the due date, the patent right shall be terminated on the due date of the outstanding annual fee.


 


The patent certification describes the legal status of the patent right upon registration. The transfer, pledge, inefficacy, termination, recovery, and the changes about the name, nationality, address of the patent owner shall be updated with the Patent Registration Record.


 







 


Director of the Bureau: Tian, Lipu


 


State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of China (Stamp)


 







 


January 12, 2011
EXHIBIT 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Annual Report of Canadian Zinc Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Kearney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: April 30, 2015
By:
/s/  John F. KearneyJohn F. Kearney

President and Chief Executive Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.