alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1602-E1603]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  RECOGNITION OF TAIWAN'S NATIONAL DAY

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. TIM RYAN

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Mr. RYAN of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, in celebration of Taiwan's National 
Day on October

[[Page E1603]]

10th, I believe it fitting to call to mind one of the basic elements of 
the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) that has long guided America's worldwide 
relationships.
  The TRA states in SEC 2(b)(4)

       ``. . . to consider any effort to determine the future of 
     Taiwan by other than peaceful means, including by boycotts or 
     embargoes, a threat to the peace and security of the Western 
     Pacific area and of grave concern to the United States;''

  The Taiwan Relations Act is monumental in the unique impact it has 
had in maintaining the Peace in the Pacific and our relationship with 
the nations of the Region.
  Congratulations to Taiwan during this exciting time in your country's 
history and for helping to maintain peace in Southeast Asia.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 23.1 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement  on Form  S-8 (No.  333-41905  and No.  333-68636)  of  National  R.V.
Holdings,  Inc. of our report dated  February 1, 2002,  except for Note 5, as to
which the date is March 26,  2002,  relating  to the  financial  statements  and
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Irvine, California
March 29, 2002
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

 AIR AND RADIATION

August 19, 2015

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Files on DVD for EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0827-DRAFT-0837

FROM: Christine Brunner

Assessment and Standards Division

Office of Transportation and Air Quality

TO: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and 

Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles - Phase 2 - Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0827

The enclosed DVD contains the following file associated with docket item EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0827-

DRAFT-0837:

GEM_P2V1.1 Power User Release.zip

The “zip” file contains these folders and files:

1) GEM phase II

2) REVS_Common

3) Memo to Docket -GEM new release (GEM P2v1_1).docx

4) readme.txt
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4928 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4928

   To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that the United 
States district court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive 
 jurisdiction over actions arising under the immigration laws, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2018

   Mr. Brat introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that the United 
States district court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive 
 jurisdiction over actions arising under the immigration laws, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JURISDICTION OVER CASES ARISING UNDER THE IMMIGRATION LAWS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 85 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1370. Jurisdiction over cases arising under the immigration laws
    ``(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the district 
court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive jurisdiction 
over--
            ``(1) any case arising under the immigration laws (as such 
        term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and 
        Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.)); or
            ``(2) any claim brought by any foreign national challenging 
        an order of removal from the United States or any other action 
        authorized under the Immigration and Nationality Act.''.
    (b) Table of Sections.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 84 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following:

``1370. Jurisdiction over cases arising under the immigration laws.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4694 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4694

To provide for the compensation of Federal employees furloughed during 
                         a Government shutdown.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2017

 Mr. Beyer (for himself, Mr. Wittman, Mr. Serrano, Mr. DeSaulnier, Mr. 
   Pocan, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Ms. Norton, Mrs. Comstock, Mr. 
 Kilmer, Ms. Barragan, Mr. Perlmutter, Ms. Shea-Porter, Mr. Connolly, 
 Mr. Cicilline, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Scott of 
 Virginia, Ms. Meng, Mr. Lowenthal, Ms. Pingree, Mr. Takano, Mr. Brown 
of Maryland, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Delaney, Mr. Garamendi, and Mr. 
    Lynch) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the compensation of Federal employees furloughed during 
                         a Government shutdown.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Employee Retroactive Pay 
Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES FURLOUGHED DURING A 
              GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN.

    Federal employees furloughed as a result of any lapse in 
appropriations that begins on or about December 22, 2017, shall be 
compensated at their standard rate of compensation, for the period of 
such lapse in appropriations, as soon as practicable after such lapse 
in appropriations ends.
                                 <all>
```
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 30, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-01372-CR

No. 05-14-01373-CR

LADARIUS DEWAYNE BASCOM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F14-75292-T, F14-75299-T

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O’Neill, Lang-Miers, and Brown

Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers

Ladarius Dewayne Bascom pleaded guilty to two offenses of aggravated robbery with a 

deadly weapon. Pursuant to plea agreements, the trial court sentenced appellant to eight years’ 

imprisonment on each case. Appellant waived his right to appeal as part of the plea agreements.

See Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 219–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The trial court certified 

that the cases involved plea bargains and appellant has no right to appeal and that appellant 

waived his right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2005). We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

141372F.U05

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

LADARIUS DEWAYNE BASCOM, 

Appellant

No. 05-14-01372-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-75292-T.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, 

Justices O’Neill and Brown participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 30th day of October, 2014.
–3–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

LADARIUS DEWAYNE BASCOM, 

Appellant

No. 05-14-01373-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-75299-T.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, 

Justices O’Neill and Brown participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 30th day of October, 2014.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Verdisys, Inc., now
      known as Blast Energy Services, Inc., (the “Company”) for the period ended March
      31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, John O’Keefe, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
      Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      June 2, 2006




By:
            /s/
                John O’KeefeJohn
                O’KeefeCo-Chief
                Executive OfficerChief
                Financial OfficerPrincipal
                Accounting Officer
# C_2009167EN.01001102.xml

| 18.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/11

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 23 April 2009 — New Europe v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-383/08) (1)

1

(Formal inadmissibility of the application - Name of the applicant - Legal person governed by private law - Authority - Manifest inadmissibility - Intervention)

2009/C 167/23

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: New Europe (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A.-M. Alamanou, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission decision taken in the form of a letter of 2 July 2008 refusing to inform the applicant of the names of the companies and persons cited in the documents disclosed by the Commission relating to the ‘Eximo’ case,

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application is dismissed as being inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as being inadmissible.

| 2. | The applicant shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall bear its own costs.

| 3. | There is no need to rule on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the European Data Protection Supervisor. |
| --- | --- |

3.

There is no need to rule on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the European Data Protection Supervisor.

---

(1)  OJ C 301 of 22.11.2008.

1

---
Exhibit 13.1 CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B d e C.V.  (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: The Annual Report on form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results from operations of the Company. Date: April 25, 2012

   /s/ Carlos Salazar LomelínCarlos Salazar Lomelín Chief Executive OfficerDate: April 25, 2012

   /s/ Héctor Treviño GutiérrezHéctor Treviño GutiérrezChief Financial Officer
 FDO NOT DELETE.  NEEDED FOR PAGE NUMBERING      Exh. 13.1-1


---
exh10-50.htm


 










Exhibit 10.50


 


Certification No.: 1315842







Design Patent Certification


(Translation)







Name of the Design:  Toy (Bricks)


Designer: Lin, Wei


Patent No.: ZL 2009 3 0680023.1


Application Date: December 12th 2009


Patent Owner: Lin, Wei







Date of Authorization Proclamation: August 18, 2010







This design has been reviewed by our bureau staff in accordance with the Patent Law of the People’s Republic of China. We have decided to grant the patent right to this design, issue this certification and register for the Patent Registration Records. The patent right shall become effective from the date of authorization proclamation.







The term of this patent is 10 years, starting from the application date. The patent owner shall pay for the annual patent fee according to the Patent Law and Implementing Rules. The annual patent fee shall be paid by December 12 of each calendar year. In the circumstance that the annual payment is not made by the due date, the patent right shall be terminated on the due date of the outstanding annual fee.







The patent certification describes the legal status of the patent right upon registration. The transfer, pledge, inefficacy, termination, recovery, and the changes about the name, nationality, address of the patent owner shall be updated with the Patent Registration Record.







Director of the Bureau: Tian, Lipu


State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of China (Stamp)







August 18, 2010
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. 

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

JOSEPH HALL,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10211

D.C. No. 2:06-cr-00310-HDM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Peggy A. Leen, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted March 8, 2011***

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Joseph Hall appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his Federal

Rule of Criminal Procedure section 41(e) motion for the return of seized currency. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

MAR 15 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10211

Hall contends that the government failed to comply with the due process

notice requirement because it failed to ensure that he was personally served with

the notice of the pending forfeiture proceedings. The record reflects that, by

delivering a certified-mail notice of pending administrative forfeiture proceedings

addressed to Hall at the detention center where he was incarcerated and receiving a

receipt confirming delivery, the government complied with the due process notice

requirements for property seizure. See Dusenbery v. United States, 534 U.S. 161,

168-71 (2002). 

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS AMENDED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 30, 1996 AND
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
30, 1996 CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED MARCH 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000910721
<NAME> DM MANAGEMENT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-25-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             166
<SECURITIES>                                     3,884
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,401
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,556
<PP&E>                                           6,859
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,380
<BONDS>                                          5,448
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,955
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,826
<SALES>                                         68,996
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,996
<CGS>                                           41,113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 251
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (929)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (93)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (836)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (836)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40926

Summary Calendar

JULIUS WARNER MARACALIN

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

MARVIN D MORRISON, Warden

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:03-CV-631

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Julius Warner Maracalin, federal prisoner # 02617-095, appeals from the

district court’s denial of his motion for relief pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)

from the denial of his petition for 28 U.S.C. § 2241 relief, a denial of relief that

we affirmed. Maracalin v. Morrison, 185 F. App’x 430, 431 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 127 S. Ct. 312 (2006).

The denial of Maracalin’s Rule 60(b) motion was not an abuse of discretion.

See Seven Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi, 635 F.2d 396, 402 (5th Cir. 1981). We held

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 19, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-40926

2

that Maracalin could not pursue relief pursuant to § 2241 on the contentions on

which he sought a ruling in the Rule 60(b) motion. Maracalin, 185 F. App’x at

431. Because Maracalin cannot obtain relief in a § 2241 proceeding, the merits

of his underlying contentions need not be addressed.

Maracalin’s appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Maracalin is warned that any future attempts to evade the requirements for

filing a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, however styled, may result in the

imposition of sanctions against him.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Exhibit 32.3

Certification of Chief Accounting Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011(the Report) of
MCG Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Linda A. Nimmons, the Chief Accounting Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ LINDA A. NIMMONSName:

Linda A. NimmonsTitle:

Chief Accounting OfficerDate

November 3, 2011
<PAGE>

                              EXHIBIT NUMBER 13(1)

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                WITH RESPECT TO THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F/A
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003
                          OF CHINA ENTERPRISES LIMITED

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of China Enterprises Limited, a Bermuda company (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge, that:

      (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: December 12, 2005

                                                      /s/ Dr. Yap, Allan
                                                      ------------------
                                                       DR. YAP, ALLAN
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

      The certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed
as part of the Form 20-F/A or as a separate disclosure document of the Company
or the certifying officer.