alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4569 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To require counterterrorism information sharing 

coordination, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4569 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Counterterrorism In3 formation Sharing Improvement Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. COUNTERTERRORISM INFORMATION SHARING CO5 ORDINATION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President, acting though the 

7 Secretary of Homeland Security, shall ensure that, for 

8 counterterrorism purposes, the Department of the Home9 land Security has access to biographic and biometric data 

10 collected by the United States Government on individuals 

11 associated with a terrorist organization. 

12 (b) COORDINATION.—The President shall direct the 

13 heads of relevant Federal departments and agencies to co14 ordinate with the Secretary of Homeland Security to mini15 mize and overcome any administrative, technical, capacity, 

16 or classification challenges to carrying out subsection (a). 

17 (c) PROTECTIONS.—The Secretary of Homeland Se18 curity shall ensure that all relevant laws, rules, and proce19 dures, including the section 552(a) of title 5, United 

20 States Code (commonly referred to as the ‘‘Privacy Act’’ 

21 or the ‘‘Privacy Act of 1974’’), regarding classification lev22 els and civil rights and civil liberties are followed while 

23 seeking to carry out subsection (a). 

24 (d) REPORT TO CONGRESS.— 

25 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after 

26 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4569 RFS

1 of Homeland Security shall, consistent with the pro2 tection of classified information, submit to the Com3 mittee on Homeland Security of the House of Rep4 resentatives and the Committee on Homeland Secu5 rity and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report 

6 on the implementation of this section. 

7 (2) CONTENTS.—The report required under 

8 paragraph (1) shall include a description of how the 

9 data referred to in subsection (a) is utilized for De10 partment of Homeland Security screening and vet11 ting purposes and any challenges associated with in12 corporating such data into departmental screening 

13 and vetting systems. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 9, 

2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
#### Sidney Goodman, Respondent, *v.*Irwin Krakower, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

June 4, 1959.

*Herman Itskowitz*and *I. Louis Friedman*for appellant.

*Clarence S. Barasch*for respondent.

*554
      *Per Curiam.*

While the plaintiff’s claim, thht'liis letter of March 25, 1957 confirmed an agreement on all the essential terms of the proposed lease then reached between him, acting on behalf of the proposed lessee, and the defendant, is strongly-discredited by the letter itself, nevertheless triable issues are present.

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Hecht and Aurelio, JJ.

Order affirmed, etc.
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (No. 333-29641, No. 333-65321, No. 333-78937, No. 333-70116, No. 333-123255, No. 333-135237, No. 333-141567 and No. 333-150929) of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. of our report dated December 11,
2008 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|/s/ PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP         
|Boston, Massachusetts December 11,
2008
#### VAN OSDOL v. STATE.

No. A-11992.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

June 23, 1954.

Bruce B. Potter, Blackwell, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Lewis A. Wallace, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

BRETT, Judge.

The plaintiff in error, Francis Oliver Van Osdol, defendant below, was charged by information in the county court of Alfalfa county, Oklahoma, with unlawfully, wil-fully and wrongfully operating a motor vehicle upon and over the highways of Alfalfa county from a point or unknown place to a place on U. S. Highway 64 approximately one-half mile east of the city of Jet in the aforesaid county, while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. He was tried by a jury, convicted, the jury being unable to agree on the punishment left the punishment to be assessed by the trial judge who thereupon fixed the punishment at 30 days in the county jail and a fine of $500 and costs; judgment and sentence was entered accordingly, from which this appeal has been taken.

We have carefully considered the excellent brief filed by counsel for the defendant. We feel this is a case where it is unnecessary to recite the evidence or the law but that in order to speed up the disposition of the many cases pending on appeal, the case should properly be disposed of by a memorandum opinion, as authorized by the Legislature. 20 O.S.1951 § 47, as amended 1953. Nichols v. State, Okl.Cr., 264 P.2d 366.

The judgment and sentence of the county court of Alfalfa county is accordingly affirmed.

POWELL, P. J., and JONES, J., concur.
CORRECTED OPINION UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6907

CLARENCE T. FOX, JR.; GERALDINE C. FOX, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; HARLEY G. LAPPIN; JIM RALPH; STEPHEN M. DEWALT; LAURENE SHARPE, Case Manager; GRETCHEN ROBINSON; PHILLIP CLARK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-04-152-5-H) Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 20, 2004 Corrected Opinion Filed: November 4, 2004 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence T. Fox, Jr., Geraldine C. Fox, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Geraldine and Clarence Fox appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their civil rights suit as frivolous and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, as to Clarence Fox, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons , No. CA-04-152-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 31 & May 27, 2004). As to Geraldine Fox, we agree that her claim is frivolous for the reasons stated by the district court; however, we affirm the dismissal of her claim as modified to reflect that the dismissal should have been under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2000). We deny Geraldine Fox’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ONHEALTH NETWORK COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                               U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1
<CASH>                                         2,119
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    765
<ALLOWANCES>                                     256
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,037
<PP&E>                                         1,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                   774
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,195
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         132
<OTHER-SE>                                      (433)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,894
<SALES>                                          919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,522
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              12,787
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (755)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (11,185)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (11,185)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (11,185)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (1.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.14)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2





Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Wild Oats Markets, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 28, 2002, as amended by
Form 10-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Edward F. Dunlap, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                            
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained
    in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Edward
    F. Dunlap
    Edward F. Dunlap
    Chief Financial Officer | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|April 28, 2003                                                            | 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Wild Oats Markets, Inc. and will be retained by Wild Oats Markets, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULES



The Board of Directors
Penn-America Group, Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Penn-America Group, Inc. of our report dated January 19, 2001, included in
the 2000 Annual Report to Shareholders of Penn-America Group, Inc. Our audit
also included the financial statement schedules of Penn-America Group, Inc.
listed in Item 14(a) as of December 31, 2000 and for the year then ended. These
schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion based on our audit.

In our opinion, the financial statement schedules referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 No. 33-82728 and Form S-3 No. 333-33474) of Penn-America Group and its
subsidiaries of this report and our report dated January 19, 2001, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Penn-America Group, Inc.,
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year end
December 31, 2000.


                                       /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 28, 2001


<PAGE>


              Independent Auditors' Consent and Report on Schedules


The Board of Directors
Penn-America Group, Inc.:

The audit referred to in our report dated January 22, 1999 includes the related
financial statement schedules as of December 31, 1998, and for the year then
ended, included in the annual report on Form 10-K. These financial statement
schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statement schedules based on our
audit. In our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
33-82728) on Form S-8 and Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-33474) of
Penn-America Group, Inc. of our reports dated January 22, 1999, relating to the
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows of
Penn-America Group, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1998,
and all related schedules, which reports appear in the December 31, 2000 annual
report on Form 10-K of Penn-America Group, Inc.

                                   /s/KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 28, 2001
# C_2009282EN.01004601.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/46

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 October 2009 — Bank Melli Iran v Council

(Case T-390/08) (1)

1

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran to prevent nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Actions for annulment - Judicial review - Misuse of powers - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Right to property - Rights of defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Obligation to state reasons - Competence of the Community)

2009/C 282/87

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bank Melli Iran (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: L. Defalque, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop, E. Finnegan and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: V. Jackson, Agent, assisted by S. Lee, Barrister); French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, L. Butel and E. Belliard, Agents); and Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Aalto and E. Cujo, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of paragraph 4 of Table B of the Annex to Council Decision 2008/475/EC of 23 June 2008 implementing Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2008 L 163, p. 29) in so far as it relates to Bank Melli Iran and its branches.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Melli Bank to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Melli Bank to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

| 3. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the French Republic and the Commission of the European Union to bear their own costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the French Republic and the Commission of the European Union to bear their own costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 272, 25.10.2008.

1

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4763 

To require the pursuit of technologies to remove space debris. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2018 

Ms. MENG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To require the pursuit of technologies to remove space debris. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Space Debris Removal 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ORBITAL DEBRIS REMOVAL TECHNOLOGIES. 

7 Section 31501 of title 51, United States Code, is 

8 amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘§ 31501. Orbital debris 

10 ‘‘The Administrator, in conjunction with the heads 

11 of other Federal agencies, shall take steps to develop or 

12 acquire technologies and policies that will enable the AdVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:53 Jan 12, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4763.IH H4763

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4763 IH

1 ministration to decrease the risks associated with and re2 move orbital debris.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1995 AND
AS OF MARCH 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000919602
<NAME> FARADAY FINANCIAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,216
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,352)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,225)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,225)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,225)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21 to Buckhead America Corporation
                          December 31, 1997 Form 10-KSB


                          BUCKHEAD AMERICA CORPORATION
                            (A Delaware Corporation)

                              SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
                             As of December 31, 1997


                              DELAWARE CORPORATIONS

                               BLM Virginia, Inc.
                                 BLM Prime, Inc.
                            CHI - Sandy Springs, Inc.
                           BAC Hotel Management, Inc.
                              BLM EB Orlando, Inc.
                                  BLM EB, Inc.
                            BLM EB Miami, Inc. BLM EB
                                  Daytona, Inc.
                                   BLM-F, Inc.
                                  BLM-RH, Inc.
                                  BLM-RF, Inc.
                              BAC Franchising Inc.


                                TEXAS CORPORTION

                         Country Hearth Inns/Texas, Inc.


                               GEORGIA CORPORATION

                       Country Hearth Inns - Dalton, Inc.

                                OHIO CORPORATIONS

                          The Lodge Keeper Group, Inc.
                 Integrated Motel Management Group of Ohio, Inc.
                                  HOMANCO, Inc.
                             LKG Development I, Inc.