alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
October 2, 2015

Mr. Zachary Brown

426 NE Fargo Street

Portland

, OR 97212

Dear Mr. Brown :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your exemption request filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2800 on July 8, 2015

, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any ad ditional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please no te that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/ s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
EXHIBIT 23.1


                               KYLE L. TINGLE, CPA








To Whom It May Concern:                                       October 1, 2002


The firm of Kyle L. Tingle,  CPA, LLC consents to the inclusion of his report of
September 18, 2002 accompanying the audited  financial  statements of Investment
Agents,  Inc., as at August 31, 2002, in the Form 10QSB with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission.

Very truly yours,


/s/ KYLE L. TINGLE
________________________
Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC
















                    P.O. Box 50141, Henderson, Nevada 89016
                   Phone: (702) 434-8452, Fax: (702) 436-4218
                         e-mail: Ktingle@worldnet.att
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Huntington Preferred
Capital, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending March 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Michael J. McMennamin, President of the Company (principal
executive officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                           /s/ Michael J. McMennamin
                                          ------------------------------------
                                             Michael J. McMennamin
                                             President
                                             (principal executive officer)
                                             August 19, 2002
**Exhibit32.2**

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies,Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September30, 2006, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Young Ham                      |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|
| Young Ham, Chief Financial Officer |
| November 14, 2006                  |

 

1

----
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

The subsidiaries of Allied Holdings, Inc. and the place of incorporation or
organization are as follows:

Allied Holdings, Inc. - Georgia
Allied Automotive Group, Inc. - Georgia
Allied Industries Incorporated - Georgia
Haul Risk Management Services, Inc. - Georgia
Link Information Systems, Inc. - Georgia
Allied Southwoods, Inc. - Georgia
Axis Group, Inc. - Georgia -
Allied Systems Ltd. (L.P.) - Georgia
A H Industries, Inc. - Canada
Inter Mobile, Inc. - Georgia
Legion Transportation, Inc. - Georgia
Automotive Transport Services, Inc. - Georgia
Auto Haulaway Company - Canada
Haul Insurance Limited - Cayman Islands
Allied ACS, Inc. - Florida
Axis International, Inc. - Georgia
Axis Truck Leasing, Inc. - Georgia
Axis North America, Inc. - Georgia
Kar-Tainer International Ltd. - Bermuda
Kar-Tainer International, Inc. - Florida
Kar-Tainer International (Pty) Ltd. - South Africa
Canadian Acquisition Corp. - Georgia
RC Management Corp. - Delaware
Allied Freight Broker, Inc. - Virginia
QAT, Inc. - Florida
OSHCO, Inc. - Florida
Terminal Service Co. - Washington
F.J. Boutell Driveway Co., Inc. - Michigan
RMX, Inc. - Delaware
Transport Support, Inc - Delaware.
Commercial Carriers, Inc. - Michigan
B&C, Inc. - Michigan


                                       24
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF KPMG LLP







The Board of Directors

Bedford Property Investors, Inc.:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-23687, 333-33643, 333-33795, 333-108908 and 333-112144) and the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 033-52375, 333-18215, 333-70681 and 333-74707) of Bedford Property Investors, Inc. of our report dated February 10, 2003, relating to the balance sheet of Bedford Property Investors, Inc. as of December 31, 2002, and the related statements of income, stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2002, and the 2002 and 2001 information in footnote (A) to the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Bedford Property Investors, Inc.





KPMG LLP





San Francisco, California

March 12, 2004
#### The WELFARE FEDERATION ACT COMMITTEE OF 1000, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Norma RING, Defendant in Error.

No. 36362.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

March 1, 1955.

Rehearing Denied March 29, 1955.

Charles Hill Johns, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Earl E. James, George Miller, Sr., Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

CORN, Justice.

This appeal involves the identical question decided in Welfare Federation Act Committee of 1000 v. Richardson (Tinsley), Okl., 281 P.2d 428. The conclusions therein reached are applicable and controlling here.

Judgment affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J, and ARNOLD, HALLEY, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 21




         Subsidiaries of Talley Manufacturing and Technology, Inc.




The following are the subsidiaries of the Registrant, as of December 31,
1996:


                                            Percentage
                                             of Voting   Jurisdiction
                                            Securities        of
                                              Owned      Incorporation
                                            ----------   -------------

 1.     Amcan Specialty Steels, Inc.           100%      New Jersey

 2.     Dimetrics, Inc.                        100%      Delaware 

 3.     Electrodynamics, Inc.                  100%      Arizona 

 4.     John J. McMullen Associates, Inc.      100%      Delaware

 5.     Porcelain Products Co.                 100%      Delaware

 6.     Rowe Industries, Inc.                  100%      Delaware

 7.     Talley Canada, Inc.                    100%      Canada    

 8.     Talley Defense Systems, Inc.           100%      Delaware

 9.     Talley Metals Technology, Inc.         100%      Delaware

10.     Talley Technology, Inc.                100%      Delaware

11.     Universal Propulsion Company, Inc.     100%      Delaware

12.     Waterbury Companies, Inc.              100%      Delaware





Each of the above subsidiaries is included in the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements.  Several inactive or minor corporations are not
included above because all of them, when taken in the aggregate, do not
constitute a significant subsidiary.





<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1587]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. MIKE THOMPSON

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Mr. THOMPSON of California. Mr. Speaker, on September 19, 2012, I 
missed rollcall vote No. 585. Had I been present, I would have voted in 
the following manner:
  Rollcall No. 585, ``aye.''

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Annual Report of Canadian
Zinc Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Kearney, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: October 3, 2016 | By: | /s/ John F. Kearney                                                                              
|--------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |     |                                                                                                  
|                      |     | John F.
                                    Kearney
        President and Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
null

56.015385
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1628]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  IN HONOR OF THE CITY OF INDEPENDENCE

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in honor of the City of 
Independence, Ohio, an exemplary community within Northeast Ohio.
  Independence was first organized as a township in 1814. Its first 
resident, Ichabod Lord Skinner, settled in the area in 1818. Not until 
1827, with the opening on the Ohio and Erie Canal, did the township 
become accessible to trade and more settlers. Independence grew quickly 
in the subsequent century, reaching the status of village in 1914. It 
became the City of Independence in 1960.
  Known as the ``Heart of Cuyahoga County,'' Independence is one of 
Northeast Ohio's most desirable cities for families to work and raise 
their families. It is also home to the Cleveland Cavalier's training 
facility.
  Today, the City of Independence is home to approximately 7,000 
residents who are led by Mayor Gregory Kurtz. There are seven members 
on the City Council: Anthony Togliatti, Patricia Wisnieski, Jim Crooks, 
Jim Riley, Carl Asseff, Tom Naduzzi and Peter Nelson.
  Mr. Speaker and colleagues, please join me in honoring the City of 
Independence and all of its residents.

                          ____________________
```
#### Donald F. SUMP, Appellant (Plaintiff below), v. CITY OF SHERIDAN, Wyoming, a Municipal Corporation, Appellee (Defendant below).

No. 2963.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Feb. 21, 1961.

*1009E. E. Lonabaugh of Lonabaugh & Lona-baugh, Sheridan, for appellant.

Bruce P. Badley, City Atty., and R. G. Diefenderfer, Sheridan, for appellee.

Before BLUME, C. J., and PARKER and HARNSBERGER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioning for rehearing, appellant insists he is entitled to be heard because (a) this court based its opinion upon the trial court’s having dismissed the complaint rather than having given a summary judgment; (b) this court held that appealing from the judgment was an election to stand upon the complaint; and (c) plaintiff was. denied opportunity to present affidavits in accordance with Rule 12(b), Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure.

The first two of these criticisms are without merit because the judgment simply decreed “that Plaintiff’s Complaint be and the same is hereby dismissed.” Thus, by its plain, certain and unambiguous language it did nothing but dismiss the complaint. It was not in any sense a summary judgment.

The failure of appellant to ask leave to amend the complaint and his appealing from that judgment was clearly an election to stand upon the dismissed complaint.

The opinion sufficiently pointed out the inapplicability of that portion of Rule 12(b), Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure, which specifies under what circumstances plaintiff should be given time within which to file opposing affidavits, and we see no reason to further amplify upon that question.

Rehearing Denied.
# C_2008301EN.01005401.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/54

---

Action brought on 24 September 2008 — El Fatmi v Council

(Case T-409/08)

(2008/C 301/90)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: El Fatmi (Vught, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Pulles)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 to be inapplicable and/or declare Council Decision 2008/583/EC of 15 July 2008 to be void, in so far as they apply to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 to be inapplicable and/or declare Council Decision 2008/583/EC of 15 July 2008 to be void, in so far as they apply to the applicant;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant asks the Court to declare Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 (1) to be inapplicable to him and Council Decision 2008/583/EC (2) to be void, in so far as it applies to the applicant.

1

2

First, the applicant submits that the Council acted contrary to the requirements of Article 5 EC. The Council had no power, since there is no connection to third countries or to the common market.

Second, Articles 60, 301 and 308 EC do not confer any power to adopt the contested regulation.

Third, the Council acted contrary to Article 1(3) of Common Position 2001/931 of 27 December 2001 (3) and infringed essential procedural requirements and principles of Community law, including the duty to state reasons. According to the applicant, the national decisions on which the Council also relies are not decisions adopted by a competent authority within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the Common Position or are decisions that have been annulled on appeal to the national courts.

3

Fourth, the Council has infringed the applicant's fundamental rights and in particular the right to respect for private and family life, the right to effective judicial protection and the right to property.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001of 27 December 2001on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (OJ 2001 L 344, p. 70).

1

(2)  Council Decision of 15 July 2008 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2007/868/EC (OJ 2008 L 188, p. 21).

2

(3)  Council Common Position of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (OJ 2001 L 344, p. 93).

3

---
#### Angelo NIGRO, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 11525.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 1939.

Charles S. Walden and Michael A. O’Donnell, both of Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

Maurice M. Milligan, U. S. Atty., and Richard K. Phelps, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Kansas City, Mo.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed, per dismissal by appellant, without .costs to either party in this court. Defendant ordered to surrender to custody, etc.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.1.5


                                 AMENDMENT NO. 4

                EASYLINK SERVICES CORPORATION 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN

         The Plan named above gives the Employer the right to amend it at any
time. According to that right, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of June
15, 2004:

         1. By amending Section 3.01 (Employer Contributions) to revise the
penultimate paragraph thereof to read as follows:

         "The Employer shall make all Matching Contributions to the Trustee in
         the form of Qualifying Employer Securities."

         2. By amending Section 4.01 (Investment and Timing of Contributions) to
revise clause (b) thereof to read as follows:

         "Matching Contributions shall be invested in Qualifying Employer
         Securities."

         3. By amending Section 4.01A (Investment in Qualifying Employer
Securities) to revise the first sentence thereof to read as follows:

         "All of the Participant's Account resulting from Matching Contributions
         shall be invested in Qualifying Employer Securities."

         This amendment is made an integral part of the aforesaid Plan and is
controlling over the terms of said Plan with respect to the particular items
addressed expressly herein. All other provisions of the Plan remain unchanged
and controlling.

         Unless otherwise stated on any page of this amendment, eligibility for
benefits and the amount of any benefits payable to or on behalf of an individual
who is an Inactive Participant on the effective date stated above, shall be
determined according to the provisions of the aforesaid Plan as in effect on the
day before he became an Inactive Participant.

         Signing this amendment, the Employer, as plan sponsor, has made the
decision to adopt this plan amendment. The Employer is acting in reliance on its
own discretion and on the legal and tax advice of its own advisors, and not that
of any member of the Principal Financial Group or any representative of a member
company of the Principal Financial Group.



         Signed this 15th day of June, 2004.


                                             EasyLink Services Corporation

                                             By: /s/ Thomas Murawski
                                                 -------------------
                                             Name: Thomas Murawski
                                             Title: President & CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND
AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000910639
<NAME> FARADAY FINANCIAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,436
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,682)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (166)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (166)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (166)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>