alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### KERR, Adm’x, v. UNITED COLLECTION SERVICE et al.

No. 35704.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

March 2, 1954.

*612W. R. Kerr, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Merrill S. Bernard, Tulsa, for defendants in error.

JOHNSON, Vice Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s petition filed in a subsequent and separate action which alleged that plaintiff’s deceased was a constable and earned fees as such in a large number of cases which were filed for numerous defendants by defendant Bernard as lawyer; that Bernard and the other defendants constituted a collection agency which received the accounts on which these original suits were predicated with the agreement between defendants and those to whom such accounts were due, that the former would hold the latter harmless as to all costs involved in collecting such accounts; that a large number of such cases so filed resulted in plaintiff’s earning fees which were due and totaling a large sum of money as such costs or fees, concluding with a prayer for recovery of earned fees against defendants in the separate and subsequent action.

The demurrer was properly sustained. The petition did not state a cause of action. There is no common-law rule that permits recovery of expenses of litigation. If any such right exists it must be statutory. One entitled to recover statutory taxable cost (including constable fees) must do so in the original action, and not by a subsequent suit. Stone-Easter, Inc., v. City of Seattle, 121 Wash. 520, 209 P. 687, 215 P. 56. For other cases see 5th Dec. Dig., Costs, page 850.

Affirmed.

HADLEY, C. J., and CORN, DAVI-SON, O’NEAL and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur.

WILLIAMS, J., dissents.
# C_2009044EN.01007502.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/75

---

Action brought on 12 November 2008 — N v Parliament

(Case F-93/08)

(2009/C 44/134)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: N (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the applicant's periodical report for the period from 1 January 2007 to 30 April 2007.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 4 March 2008, which adversely affects the applicant inasmuch as it definitively confirms and approves his periodical report for the period from 1 January 2007 to 30 April 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 4 March 2008, which adversely affects the applicant inasmuch as it definitively confirms and approves his periodical report for the period from 1 January 2007 to 30 April 2007;

| — | Annul the report at issue; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the report at issue;

| — | Annul the decision of the President of Parliament of 25 September 2008 rejecting the applicant's complaint seeking annulment of the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the President of Parliament of 25 September 2008 rejecting the applicant's complaint seeking annulment of the contested decision;

| — | Order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  318,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,400
<INVENTORY>                                    305,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               692,900
<PP&E>                                         452,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 153,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,156,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          523,600
<BONDS>                                         80,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                     344,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,156,500
<SALES>                                      2,163,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,163,900
<CGS>                                        1,669,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,669,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               436,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21
        

</TABLE>
**AMENDED GUARANTY**

 

For value received, Beard Technologies, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation whose address is Enterprise Plaza, Suite 320, 5600 North May Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112, guarantees payment of principal and interest of that certain Fourth Amended and Restated Promissory Note executed on July 26, 2006, but effective for all purposes as of October 7, 2005.  This Guaranty supersedes and replaces our previous Guarantees dated September 29, 2005, February 7, 2006, March 22, 2006 and May 1, 2006. 

 

| Dated:  July 26, 2006 | BEARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
|-----------------------|--------------------------|

 

 

|   | By   | /s/Herb Mee, Jr. |
|--------|----------------|------------------|

|   | Herb Mee, Jr., Vice President |
|--------|-------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 446 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 136
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 446

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2017

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 12737, the Commission may, at the request of the licensee for 
the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good 
faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of that section 
and the Commission's procedures under that section, extend the time 
period during which the licensee is required to commence the 
construction of the project for up to 3 consecutive 2-year periods from 
the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued by the 
Commission.
    (b) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the period required for 
commencement of construction of the project described in subsection (a) 
has expired prior to the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Commission may reinstate the license for the project effective as of 
the date of its expiration and the first extension authorized under 
subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of such expiration.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 136

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 446

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 13, 2017

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
# C_2010011EN.01002502.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/25

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 November 2009 — Michail v Commission

(Case T-50/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff case - Officials - Staff Report - Career Development Report - 2004 Assessment period - Duty of the Civil Service Tribunal to state reasons)

2010/C 11/49

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Christos Michail (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Meïdanis, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and K. Herrmann, Agents, and E. Bourtzalas, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 22 November 2007 in Case F-34/06 Michail v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking the setting aside of that judgment.

Michail

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Christos Michail to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission of the European Communities in the context of the present instance. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Christos Michail to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission of the European Communities in the context of the present instance.

---

(1)  OJ C 128, 24.5.2008.

1

---
EPA-R06-OAR-2010-0190-0113

http://zhi-craft.jobs.net/

Cached version : 

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:fdR9jLzvvbwJ:zhicraft.jobs.net/+zhi-craft&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

new website is at: http://www.zhi.com/employment/

This website provided a list of job openings with a major nonunion construction firm, 

indicating that most jobs (e.g. pipe fitting) offered only 40 hrs of work per week at the 

time we examined the site.
#### The WELFARE FEDERATION ACT COMMITTEE OF 1000, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Vella RHODES, Defendant in Error.

No. 36361.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

March 1, 1955.

Rehearing Denied March 29, 1955.

Charles Hill Johns, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Earl E. James, George Miller, Sr., Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

CORN, Justice.

This appeal involves the identical question decided in Welfare Federation Act Committee of 1000 v. Richardson (Tinsley), Okl., 281 P.2d 428. The conclusions therein reached are applicable and controlling here.

Judgment affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., WILLIAMS,' V. C. J., and ARNOLD, HALLEY, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 29, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 22, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage*                    ®                     *Contract 153 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-138, CP2024-144.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-28740 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
12 JANUARY 2014

Twelfth Court of Appeals

1517 W Front St Ste 354

Tyler TX 75702-7854

Re: Larry Smith v. State

 12-13-00033-CR

Please find enclosed a copy of the letter sent to Mr. Smith regarding his right to file a PDR along 

with a copy of the certified return receipt showing the mailing of the same. 

Sincerely,

/s/Austin Reeve Jackson

ACCEPTED

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

1/12/2015 1:38:02 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/12/2015 1:38:02 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk

6 JANUARY 2015

Larry Joe Smith

Inmate: 01835904

Duncan Unit

1502 S 1st St

Diboll TX 75941-9668

By Certified Mail

Re: Appeal

Mr. Smith: 

Please find enclosed a copy of the opinion issued by the Twelfth Court of Appeals in your case. 

Because we waived the right to appeal and asked that this appeal be dismissed, the Court has 

done so. 

You do have the right to file a pro se Petition for Discretionary Review in the Court of Criminal 

Appeals should you desire to do so. If you decide to pursue that option you must file your 

petition prior to the expiration of thirty days from the date of the court’s opinion. 

As always, should you have any questions I will be happy to assist in any way that I can.

Sincerely,

Austin Reeve Jackson
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Blast Energy Services,
      Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John
      O’Keefe, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      June 2, 2006




By:
            /s/
                John O’KeefeJohn
                O’KeefeCo-Chief
                Executive OfficerChief
                Financial OfficerPrincipal
                Accounting Officer
#### In the Matter of HOME PAINT & GLASS COMPANY, a Michigan Corporation, Alleged Bankrupt. John C. MEISSNER, Brookfield Studios, an Illinois Corporation, and Detroit Glass Dealers’ Association, an Unincorporated Voluntary Association, Appellants, v. HOME PAINT & GLASS COMPANY, a Michigan Corporation, and Hartwell Johnson, Receiver of Home Paint & Glass Company, Appellees.

No. 8415.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 9, 1939.

Beckenstein, Wisok, & Maguire and Frazer & Popkin, all of Detroit, Mich., for appellants.

Norman J. Miller, of Detroit, Mich., for appellees.

Before HICKS and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On reading and filing the stipulation of the above named alleged bankrupt, appellants and appellees herein, that this cause be dismissed without costs to any of the parties hereto, and the court being fully advised in the premises, now, therefore, on motion of Beckenstein, Wisok & Maguire, attorneys for appellants, it is ordered that the appeal taken in this cause and all proceedings based thereon 'be and the same hereby is docketed and dismissed without costs to, any of the parties thereto.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-20261

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN ANTONIO ESCOBAR

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:06-CR-89-2

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Juan Antonio Escobar has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Escobar has filed a response. Our independent review of

the record, counsel’s brief, and Escobar’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-20261

2

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Escobar’s motion for the appointment of

substitute counsel is DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-102550) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-98231, No. 333-102554, No. 333-09727, No. 333-39181, No. 333-45731, No. 333-60993, No. 333-72527, No. 333-87511,No. 333-30164, No. 333-41088, and No. 333-68102) of Captiva Software Corporation (formerly ActionPoint, Inc.) of our report dated March 20, 2003 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in thisForm 10-K. 

 

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

San Diego, CA 

March 27, 2003
#### William J. McMAHON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 11198.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

March 15, 1939.

Roy W. Rucker and James Daleo, both of Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

Maurice M. Milligan, U. S. Atty., and Randall Wilson, Sam C. Blair, Thomas A. Costolow, and Richard K. Phelps, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Kansas City, Mo.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and sentence vacated, etc., and cause remanded with full power and authority in District Court to permit appellant to change his pleas, etc., on motion of appellant and consent of counsel for appellee.
# C_2011311EN.01003702.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2011 — Ruiz de la Prada de Sentmenat v OHIM — Quant (AGATHA RUIZ DE LA PRADA)

(Case T-522/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark AGATHA RUIZ DE LA PRADA - Earlier Community figurative mark representing a black and white flower - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2011/C 311/66

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Agatha Ruiz de la Prada de Sentmenat (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: R. Bercovitz Álvarez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Mary Quant Ltd (Birmingham, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Arnold and C. Hicks, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Mary Quant Ltd (Birmingham, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Arnold and C. Hicks, lawyers)

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 September 2008 (Case R 1523/2007-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Mary Quant Ltd and Agatha Ruiz de la Prada de Sentmenat.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Agatha Ruiz de la Prada de Sentmenat to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Agatha Ruiz de la Prada de Sentmenat to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 7.2.2009.

1

---
PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION

 

Exhibit 10.15

PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION




2000 STOCK OPTION PLAN




OPTION CERTIFICATE




This Certificate, when executed by a duly authorized officer of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (the "Company"), describes an Option to purchase shares of the Common Stock of the Company under the terms of the 2000 Stock Option Plan, as adopted by the Company's Board of Directors and approved by the Company's stockholders (as the same may from time to time be amended, the "Plan"), granted to the Optionee named herein.




1.

Optionee:  «FIRST»  «LAST»




2.

Number of shares of Common Stock subject to Option:  «NUMBER»




3.

Option Price Per Share:  «PRICE»




4.

Date of Grant:  «GRANT DATE»




5.

Expiration Date of Option:  «TEN YEARS FROM DATE OF GRANT »










6.

This Option is:

______________  An Incentive Stock Option




______________  A Non-Qualified Stock Option




7.

Does Optionee have the right to tender shares of the Common Stock in

payment of all or a portion of the Option Price?




Yes

______X________

No

__________________




This Option is subject to, and governed by, all of the terms of the Plan, including the provisions with respect to acceleration and early termination.  Terms defined in the Plan are used in this Certificate as so defined.




This option shall vest and become exercisable in four equal cumulative annual installments, commencing on the first anniversary of the Date of Grant.




This Certificate is not a security and does not represent the Option described herein.  Certain terms of the Option, including the exercise price and the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Option, may change as provided in the Plan or as a result of a partial exercise of the Option.  The actual exercise price and number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Option are as reflected on the books and records of the Company on the relevant date.  Neither this Certificate nor the Option represented hereby are assignable or transferable by the Optionee except as otherwise permitted under the Plan.




PHILLIPS-VAN HEUSEN CORPORATION










BY:

_____________________________________________

CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER