alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(July 15, 1991)

#### Leyla Akgul, Respondent, v Aboulkerim Akgul, Appellant.

— In an action for divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Modugno, J.H.O.), entered July 11, 1989, as (1) awarded ownership of the marital premises to the plaintiff wife pursuant to the terms of an agreement dated December 24, 1980, and (2) directed him to pay $200 per week in child support.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant husband contends that the parties’ December *19524, 1980, agreement was a contract to dissolve the marriage and void pursuant to General Obligations Law § 5-311. He also contends that the agreement is unconscionable and should not be enforced. We disagree.

An agreement does not fall within the proscription of General Obligations Law § 5-311 unless it contains an express provision requiring the dissolution of the marriage *(see, Taft v Taft,*156 AD2d 444, 445). Here, the agreement established certain rights and contingencies in the event that the wife elected to resume her divorce action, and succeeded on her claim. However, the primary purpose of the agreement was to accomplish a reconciliation between the parties while their respective actions for divorce were held in abeyance and they attempted to resolve their marital problems. There is no express provision requiring either party to seek dissolution of the marriage.

We also find that the terms of the agreement were fair and reasonable at the time it was made, and that it was not unconscionable at the time of entry of the final judgment of divorce *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [3]). Although the wife was awarded sole ownership of the marital home, we note that she waived her claim to any interest in the husband’s business and did not seek an award of maintenance. The husband was represented by counsel during the negotiation of the agreement and received benefits pursuant to its terms for more than six years prior to raising any objection to its validity. Under the circumstances, the husband must be deemed to have ratified the agreement and is precluded from attempting to set it aside *(see, Beutel v Beutel,*55 NY2d 957; *Greenfield v Greenfield,*147 AD2d 440).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Lawrence, J. P., Eiber, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Sadie Rottenberg, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

August 31, 1959.

*Fink d Pavia (Donald J. Siskind*of counsel), for Manuel N. Manfield, petitioner.

*Harry Lewis*for Nathan Rottenberg, respondent.

Joseph A. Cox, S.

This application to revoke letters of administration issued to the decedent’s husband is made on the ground that the decedent was not domiciled in New York County and on the further ground that the husband failed to support the decedent and is deprived of a distributive share of her estate by operation of section 87 of the Decedent Estate Law. The *203evidence clearly established that the intestate was a resident of this county at the time she entered a hospital, that thereafter she was removed from this county solely for the purpose of medical treatment and care and that during such period she did not possess sufficient mental capacity to effectuate a change of domicile. The court holds that the intestate was a resident of New York County at her death *(Matter of Ferris,*286 App. Div. 631).

The evidence further established that during the entire period of the decedent’s illness the respondent failed to provide support for her, that, except for a minor contribution to the hospital bill, he avoided his marital obligations in this respect and during the decedent’s illness which culminated in her death he neglected to provide support for her. It was further established that the respondent’s disclaimer of financial ability to support his wife was grossly false. Accordingly, it is held that the conduct of the respondent deprived him of a distributive share of the estate and the letters of administration issued to him are revoked.

Submit decree, on notice, revoking letters of administration and directing the filing of an account within 30 days from the date of the decree.
Exhibit 99.21


EXPERT CONSENT
 We do hereby consent to (i) the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate on the Lemarchant Deposit, South Tally Pond VMS Project, Central Newfoundland,Canada" dated March 2, 2012 (the “Report”) and the resource estimation information pertaining to the Report disclosed in the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) for the year ended December 31, 2013 of Canadian Zinc Corporation (the “Company”) and (ii) the use of our name in the AIF and the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto incorporating by reference the Company’s AIF.
 Dated this 20thday of March, 2014.
   Giroux Consultants Ltd.
 /s/ Giroux Consultants Ltd.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 of
Belden & Blake Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:
November 18, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Mark A. HouserMark A. Houser, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman
of the Board of Directors and Director
Exhibit 99.2


                             KERR-McGEE CORPORATION

                                Kerr-McGee Center

                          Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73125


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


I, Robert M. Wohleber,  the Chief  Financial  Officer of Kerr-McGee  Corporation
(the "Issuer"),  in compliance with 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, hereby certify in connection
with the Issuer's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period that ended June
30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the "Report")
that:

      *  the Report fully complies  with  the requirements  of  Section 13(a) or
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      *  information  contained in  the Report  fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition  and  results  of  operations of  the
         Issuer.




                                                  /s/ Robert M. Wohleber
                                                  ----------------------
                                                  Robert M. Wohleber
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  August 9, 2002
# C_2009069EN.01003802.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/38

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 December 2008 — Canon Communications v OHIM — Messe Düsseldorf (MEDTEC)

(Case T-262/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2009/C 69/88)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Canon Communications LLC (Los Angeles, United States) (represented by: M. Mak and E. Zietse, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Montalto, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Messe Düsseldorf GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 April 2008 (Case R 817/2005-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Messe Düsseldorf GmbH and Canon Communications LLC.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to rule on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to rule on the action.

| 2. | The applicant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 30.8.2008.

1

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4565 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to furnish headstones or markers to private cemeteries for graves 

of certain veterans of World War I. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2017 

Mr. TIPTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to furnish headstones or markers to private cemeteries for graves of certain veterans 

of World War I. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUESTS BY PRIVATE CEMETERIES FOR 

4 HEADSTONES OR MARKERS FOR GRAVES OF 

5 CERTAIN VETERANS OF WORLD WAR I. 

6 Section 2306(d) of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following new para8 graph: 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4565 IH

1 ‘‘(6)(A) If the Secretary is unable to identify any next 

2 of kin of a deceased individual described in subparagraph 

3 (B), a private cemetery may request the Secretary to fur4 nish— 

5 ‘‘(i) a headstone or marker for the grave of the 

6 deceased individual pursuant to paragraph (1); or 

7 ‘‘(ii) a medallion or other device to signify the 

8 deceased individual’s status as a veteran pursuant to 

9 paragraph (4). 

10 ‘‘(B) A deceased individual described in this subpara11 graph is an individual who— 

12 ‘‘(i) served in the Armed Forces during World 

13 War I; and 

14 ‘‘(ii) is eligible for a headstone or marker fur15 nished under paragraph (1) (or would be so eligible 

16 but for the date of the death of the individual).’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Exhibit 23.1

 

We consent to the reference to our firm as “Experts” in the registration statement (Form S-8 No. 333-125698) dated June 10, 2005 pertaining to the 2005 Stock Option Plan of Cheetah Oil & Gas Ltd., and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated March 31, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Cheetah Oil & Gas Ltd., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

 
|   | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |  
Vancouver, Canada  

Chartered Accountants

April 18, 2006

 

 

 

  |
|--------|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 23


Independent Auditors' Consent and Report on Schedules



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Penn-America Group, Inc.:


Under date of January 22, 1999, we reported on the  consolidated  balance sheets
of Penn-America  Group, Inc., and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997,
and the related  consolidated  statements of earnings,  stockholders equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period  ended  December 31,
1998, as contained in the 1998 annual report to stockholders. These consolidated
financial statements and our report thereon are incorporated by reference in the
annual report on Form 10-K for the year 1998.  In connection  with our audits of
the  aforementioned  consolidated  financial  statements,  we also  audited  the
related consolidated financial statement schedules as listed in the accompanying
index.  These  financial  statement  schedules  are  the  responsibility  of the
Company's  management.  Our  responsibility  is to  express  an opinion on these
financial statement schedules based on our audits.

In our opinion, such financial statement schedules,  when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated  financial  statements taken as whole, present fairly,
in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
33-82728)  on Form S-8 of  Penn-America  Group,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries  of our
reports dated January 22, 1999,  relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of
Penn-America  Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and
the related consolidated  statements of earnings,  stockholders equity, and cash
flows and the related consolidated financial statement schedules for each of the
years in the  three-year  period  ended  December 31,  1998,  which  reports are
incorporated by reference in or appear in the December 31, 1998 annual report on
Form 10-K of Penn-America Group, Inc.

                            /S/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 25, 1999
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel; NIMHD Support for Conferences and Scientific Meetings (R13).                    

*Date:*                         February 13, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, NIMHD DEM II, Suite 800, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jingsheng Tuo, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Extramural Research Administration, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451-5953,                         *jingsheng.tuo@nih.gov*.                    

Dated: January 4, 2024.

Victoria E. Townsend, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-00211 Filed 1-8-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### NEW MEXICO POTASH AND CHEMICAL COMPANY, Inc., v. INDEPENDENT POTASH AND CHEMICAL COMPANY et al.

No. 1933.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Nov. 10, 1939.

Caswell S. Neal, of Carlsbad, N. M., Tom W. Neal, of Santa Fe, N. M., Jethro S. Vaught and George R. Craig, both of Albuquerque, N. M., for appellant.

Stagner & Reese, of Carlsbad, N. M., for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, BRATTON, and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed at the costs of appellant, for the reason that the order appealed from is not a final appealable order.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5922]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  REPORTED BILL SEQUENTIALLY REFERRED

  Under clause 2 of rule XII, bills and reports were delivered to the 
Clerk for printing, and bills referred as follows:

       Mr. KING of New York: Committee on Homeland Security. H.R. 
     2356. A bill to enhance homeland security by improving 
     efforts to prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover 
     from an attack with a weapon of mass destruction, and for 
     other purposes; with an amendment (Rept. 112-665, Pt. 1); 
     referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 
     for a period ending not later than November 30, 2012, for 
     consideration of such provision of the bill and amendment as 
     fall within the jurisdiction of that committee pursuant to 
     clause 1(p), rule X.

                          ____________________
```
H. R. 46 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study 

of Fort Ontario in the State of New York. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fort Ontario Study Act’’. 

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

In this Act: 

(1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary 

of the Interior. 

(2) STUDY AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ means Fort 

Ontario in Oswego, New York. 

SEC. 3. FORT ONTARIO SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a special resource 

study of the study area. 

(b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under subsection (a), 

the Secretary shall— 

(1) evaluate the national significance of the study area; 

(2) determine the suitability and feasibility of designating 

the study area as a unit of the National Park System; 

(3) consider other alternatives for preservation, protection, 

and interpretation of the study area by the Federal Government, State or local government entities, or private and nonprofit organizations; 

(4) consult with interested Federal agencies, State or local 

governmental entities, private and nonprofit organizations, or 

any other interested individuals; and 

(5) identify cost estimates for any Federal acquisition, 

development, interpretation, operation, and maintenance associated with the alternatives. 

(c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under subsection (a) 

shall be conducted in accordance with section 100507 of title 54, 

United States Code. 

(d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date on which 

funds are first made available to carry out the study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural 

Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report that 

describes— 
H. R. 46—2 

(1) the results of the study; and 

(2) any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# C_2009044EN.01003901.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/39

---

Action brought on 22 December 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-575/08)

(2009/C 44/66)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Peere and P. Dejmek, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that in failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies (1) the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that in failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies (1) the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for the transposition of Directive 2005/56/EC expired on 14 December 2007. At the date of filing of the present action, the defendant had not adopted all the necessary implementing measures or, in any event, had not yet communicated those measures to the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 310, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6061]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. POSEY:
        H.R. 6423.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6074]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1410
                ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Womack). Pursuant to clause 8 of rule 
XX, the Chair will postpone further proceedings today on motions to 
suspend the rules on which a recorded vote or the yeas and nays are 
ordered, or on which the vote incurs objection under clause 6 of rule 
XX.
  Record votes on postponed questions will be taken later.

                          ____________________
```