alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert L. Barber, appellant, *v.*The West Jersey Title and Guaranty Company, respondent.

In case due notice of the final hearing of a cause in the court of chancery was given, and the cause was accordingly heard, but one of the parties did not appear and was not represented at the hearing, and the decree was made in his absence, he cannot appeal from such decree to this court.

On appeal from an order advised by Yiee-Chancellor Pitney, whose opinion is reported in *West Jersey Title Co.*v. *Barber, 4 Dick. Ch. Rep. 474.*

*Mr. David J. Pancoast,*for the appellant.

*Mr. Thomas E. French*and *Mr. Samuel H. Gh'ey,*for the respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

The questions principally discussed on this appeal — whether the complainant has a right to inspect and make copies of the public files and records in the office of the clerk of Camden county when that is not necessary for the conduct of any particular transaction which it has in hand, but is only convenient to prepare it for the prompt consummation of such business as *288may afterwards come to it, and whether a bill in equity is the appropriate means of enforcing its right in the premises — are questions which, in our opinion, are not free from difficulty; but, upon the case as it stands, we are not required to decide them, for this appeal is not properly before the court.

The record shows that due notice of the final hearing in the court of chancery was given to the solicitor of the defendant and that the cause was accordingly heard, but that the defendant did not appear and was not represented at the hearing, and the decree was made in his absence.

In *Townsend*v. *Smith, 1 Beas. 350,*this court decided that, from a decree thus rendered, the absent party could not take au appeal, but, if dissatisfied, must apply to the'chancellor for a rehearing.

This objection to the appeal is presented in the brief of counsel for the respondent, and therefore cannot be disregarded. Consequently, the appeal must be dismissed.

*For dismissed*— The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Magie, Reed, Bogert, Brown,. Krueger — 10.

*Contra*— None.
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.44 N 77.04 W Meters AGL
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 2, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D24

- 0395 Lower Tribunal No. 23

- 157867 SP

________________ 

### Kaiya Pineiro , Appellant,

vs. 

### Oscar Arano, et al. , Appellee s

.

An Appeal from the C ounty Court for Miami

- Dade County, Michael G. Barket , Judge. Kaiya Pineiro, in proper person

. Oscar Arano and Moraima Arano , in proper person s

.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and EMAS and BOKOR , JJ.
PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ( “ Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude
that the trial court ’ s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. ” ).
#### JOSEPH COFONE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. CARMELA COFONE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Argued October 25, 1948

Decided November 1, 1948.

*Mr. Samuel Levin*argued the cause for -the defendant-appellant *(Mr. Jack L. Holstein,*attorney).

*59
      *Mr. Robert D. Grosman*argued the cause and with *Mr. •Charles M. Grosman*filed a .brief for the petitioner-respondent.

Pee Cubiam.

We concur in the result. The evidence supports the finding that there was a wilful and continued desertion of the respondent by the appellant, and the decree therefore is affirmed.

*For affirmance:*Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Hbher, Waoheneeld, Burling and Ackerson—6.

*For reversal:*None.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Benjamin, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cohen, J.), rendered November 10, 1989, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (2 counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree under Indictment No. 6099/ 87, upon a jury verdict, and from two judgments of the same court, also rendered November 10, 1989, convicting him of *841robbery in the first degree (two counts), under Indictment No. 6108/87, and robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 7983/87, respectively, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt under Indictment No. 6099/87 beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded the evidence, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

Finally, the defendant’s contention that the sentences are excessive is without merit *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Kooper, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Ex-10.1



 






EXHIBIT 10.1




April 11, 2005 Amendment to the Comprehensive Equity

Compensation Plan for Directors and Employees (the “Plan”)




     1. Section 6(d) of the Plan is hereby amended to remove the last sentence of such section.
Accordingly, after this amendment, Section 6(d) of the Plan shall read as follows:



“(d) The Committee shall determine the time or times at which an Option may be
exercised in whole or in part, and the method or methods by which, and the form or
forms, including, without limitation, cash, Shares, other Awards, or other property,
or any combination thereof, having a Fair Market Value on the exercise date equal to
the relevant exercise price, in which payment of the exercise price with respect
thereto may be made or deemed to have been made.”



     2. Other than the above amendment, the Plan remains in full force and effect unamended hereby.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	LSB BANCSHARES, INC.
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Monaco Coach Corporation on Form S-8 (File No's. 33-76372 and 333-64691) of our
report dated January 22, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Monaco Coach Corporation as of
January 3, 1998 and January 2, 1999, and for the years ended December 28, 1996,
January 3, 1998 and January 2, 1999, which is included in this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




Eugene, Oregon
March 31, 1999
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4851 

AN ACT 

To establish the Kennedy-King National Commemorative Site 

in the State of Indiana, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4851 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kennedy–King Na3 tional Commemorative Site Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 In this Act: 

6 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

7 the Secretary of the Interior. 

8 (2) SITE.—The term ‘‘Site’’ means the Ken9 nedy-King National Commemorative Site as des10 ignated by section 3(a). 

11 (3) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 

12 of Indiana. 

13 SEC. 3. NATIONAL COMMEMORATIVE SITE. 

14 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Landmark for Peace Memo15 rial in Martin Luther King, Jr. Park in Indianapolis, in 

16 the State, is hereby designated as the Kennedy-King Na17 tional Commemorative Site. 

18 (b) AFRICAN AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS NETWORK.— 

19 The Site shall be part of the African American Civil 

20 Rights Network established under Public Law 115–104. 

21 (c) ADMINISTRATION.— 

22 (1) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—The Sec23 retary may enter into cooperative agreements with 

24 appropriate public or private entities for interpreta25 tive and educational purposes related to the Site. 
3 

•HR 4851 EH

1 (2) EFFECT OF DESIGNATION.—The Site shall 

2 not be a unit of the National Park System. 

3 (3) LIMITATIONS.—Nothing in this Act— 

4 (A) authorizes the Secretary to interfere 

5 with the rights of any person with respect to 

6 private property or any local zoning ordinance 

7 or land use plan of the State or any political 

8 subdivision thereof; or 

9 (B) authorizes the Secretary to acquire 

10 land or interests in land through condemnation 

11 or otherwise. 

12 (d) SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.—The Secretary 

13 shall conduct a special resource study of the Site to evalu14 ate the national significance of the Site and determine the 

15 suitability and feasibility of designating the Site as a unit 

16 of the National Park System. The Secretary shall also 

17 consider other alternatives for preservation, protection, 

18 and interpretation of the Site by Federal, State, or local 

19 government entities, or private and non-profit groups. The 

20 study shall be conducted in accordance with section 

21 100507 of title 54, United States Code. Not later than 

22 3 years after the date on which funds are made available 

23 to conduct the study, the Secretary shall submit a report 
4 

•HR 4851 EH

1 to Congress that describes the results of the study and 

2 any recommendations of the Secretary. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 19, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4851 

AN ACT 

To establish the Kennedy-King National Comother purposes. memorative Site in the State of Indiana, and for
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN
THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-KSB/A2 FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     OCT-01-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                  59,750
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                        2,359,857
<ALLOWANCES>                           147,001
<INVENTORY>                         10,005,057
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    17,066,204
<PP&E>                               8,597,239
<DEPRECIATION>                       5,131,746
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      37,014,921
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               21,490,095
<BONDS>                              1,235,754
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                         12,883,048
<COMMON>                                   801
<OTHER-SE>                           1,405,224
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        37,014,921
<SALES>                             35,147,333
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    35,147,333
<CGS>                               16,665,203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       16,665,203
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     644,233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      1,117,068
<INCOME-TAX>                          (210,433)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  1,327,501
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                         1,327,501
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .00
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. McMennamin, President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/    MICHAEL J. MCMENNAMINMichael J. McMennamin (chief executive officer)May 14, 2004
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. M IC H A E L J. M A K I, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 12- 30367 D . C. N o . 3 : 1 1 - c r - 0 5 4 8 8 - RBL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea lfr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on R ona l d B . L e i ght on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r24, 2013 ** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , N . R . S M IT H , an dC H R IS T E N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M i chae lJ. M aki appeal s f rom the di stri ctcourt ’ s j ud gm entand chal l enges h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n an d4 8 - m o n th s e n te n c e f o rc o n s p ir a c yto d is tr ib u te c ontr ol l e d s ubs t anc e s , i n vi ol a t i on of 21 U . S . C . §§ 841( a ) ( 1) , ( b) ( 1) ( C ) and 846; and d i stribu t i on of a c on trol l ed subst ance , i n v i ol at i on of 21 U . S . C . § 8 41 (a )( 1), 

# FI LED OC T 03 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 30367 2 ( b) ( 1) ( C ) . P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ), M aki ’ s c ou nsel h a s f ile dab r ie f

s ta tin g th a t th e r e ar e n o g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f , a lo n g w ith am o tio n to w i thd raw as coun se lof re cord. W e have provi ded M aki the op po rtun i ty t o fi l e a pro se s up pl em ent albri ef . N o p ro se supp l em ent albri ef or answ er i ng bri ef

has b e e n f ile d . O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o ar g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f a s to M ak i’s c o n v ic tio n . W e a c c o r d in g lya f

f irm M ak i’s c o n v ic tio n . M aki w ai ved the ri gh tt o app ea lhi s s ent ence . B ec ause the re cord di sc l oses n o ar g u ab le issu e a s to th e v alid ity o f th e s en ten cin g w aiv er , w e d ism iss M ak i’ s ap p e a l a s to h is s e n te n c e . Se e U ni te d States v . W

at s on , 5 8 2 F .3 d9 7 4 , 9 8 6 - 8 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D. A F F IR M E D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
# C_2010024EN.01007601.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/76

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 10 November 2009 — N v European Parliament

(Case F-93/08) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Reports - Staff report - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Statement of reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Definition of targets to be achieved)

2010/C 24/140

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: N (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: K. Zejdová, R. Ignătescu and S. Seyr, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the applicant’s staff report for the period from 1 January 2007 to 30 April 2007.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders N to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders N to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009, p. 75.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 9 (Friday, January 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 2230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00558]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; PA20-186, Midcareer Investigator 
Award in Patient-Oriented Research (Parent K24 Independent Clinical 
Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: January 24, 2024.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F40, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Robert C. Unfer, Ph.D,. Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F40, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-5035, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#62170c0407101001220c0b0a4c050d14"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e792898182959584a7898e8fc9808891">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 9, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-00558 Filed 1-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Financial Data Schedule represents Consolidated Marcus Cable Company, L.P.
and Subsidiaries as reflected in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1997.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>   0000910629
<NAME>  MARCUS CABLE COMPANY, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,607
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,839
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,904)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,647
<PP&E>                                         933,935
<DEPRECIATION>                               (227,309)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,750,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          137,042
<BONDS>                                      1,533,645
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,750,468
<SALES>                                        473,701
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               479,315
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  437,337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             151,207
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (109,229)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (109,229)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (109,229)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009,(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Larry E. Buffington                                  |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Larry Buffington,  President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| May 20, 2009                                        |   |

 

----