alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: To: Subject: Date: Joe Richards EAS (OST) DOT-OST- 1 997-2706 EAS se rvice from DEN to VE L Friday, August 23 , 2013 1 : 09 :46 PM

=:11~~-::~~. ~~"

-- " '_~ ' ;:~~ - : ": =-" ' ="""

__ "-~ .r~~ ;"' "~~~=~ , :n

_" ' ~=~""' ' '''=-~~·=== .•• ~

__ '''''' ! I : :L~'~'' ' ' '''''' " "" i';'''~n~·~ " ' ' '' '
- ~ ~ ~''o'~

. ~ ~ t,',J

. :.. • ! : -'

. ~ ; : , ,---., i '-:-. : !

..... • To whom it may Concern, My Name is Joe Richards, I represent Bart Haslem, owner of Apex Aviation that is just starting up at the Vernal Airport as new FBO. We have invested a great deal of money in to a new building and hanger, with very nice pilot lounges and a huge hanger for airplanes to get out of the weather during to long cold winters here in Vernal. We are requesting that Great Lakes be given to Contract again, mainly because we see the great service they provide to our oil field community. We also see the benefit of having Great Lakes continue three flights a day to and from Vernal to Denver. I my self, Joe, have flown for the airlines, and I really do see a problem with the EMB-120 in coming to Vernal during the summer month, yes, they may complete the flight so they get paid, but they will be greatly restricted on the weight they can take with them, meaning less people get to go, just look at West Yellowstone. I do believe that having Great Lakes going to Denver would serve our community better, having more options in Denver than Salt Lake. Since Salt lake is mainly a Delta hub, and others just have fly though stops, and after about 2pm, that airport have very few departures. Where as Denver has so many opti ons right now, with SouthWest, United, Delta, AirTran, Great Lakes and many other Regional airlines to many cities. Thank you for considering our input to the matter, Sincerely, Joe Richards Manager Bart Haslem, Owner Apex Aviation, Vernal, UT

Joe Richards 435-770-9592
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1           
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                              38,099
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,143,009
<ALLOWANCES>                                       549,455  
<INVENTORY>                                      1,381,215  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,359,931  
<PP&E>                                           3,194,969  
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,269,913  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,495,285  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,195,267  
<BONDS>                                                  0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0  
<PREFERRED>                                              0  
<COMMON>                                             2,735  
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,618,082  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,495,285  
<SALES>                                         16,120,617  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,120,617  
<CGS>                                           12,324,745  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,200,308  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    (9,847) 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  52,348  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,446,937) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,446,937) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0  
<CHANGES>                                                0  
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,446,937) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.63) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.63) 
                                                

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6071]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          MORNING-HOUR DEBATE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the order of the House of 
January 17, 2012, the Chair will now recognize Members from lists 
submitted by the majority and minority leaders for morning-hour debate.
  The Chair will alternate recognition between the parties, with each 
party limited to 1 hour and each Member other than the majority and 
minority leaders and the minority whip limited to 5 minutes each, but 
in no event shall debate continue beyond 1:50 p.m.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 21




         Subsidiaries of Talley Manufacturing and Technology, Inc.




The following are the subsidiaries of the Registrant, as of December 31,
1995:


                                          Percentage
                                           of Voting  Jurisdiction
                                          Securities       of
                                            Owned     Incorporation
                                          ----------  -------------
 
 1.     Amcan Specialty Steels, Inc.         100%     New Jersey

 2.     Dimetrics, Inc.                      100%     Delaware 

 3.     Electrodynamics, Inc.                100%     Arizona 

 4.     John J. McMullen Associates, Inc.    100%     Delaware

 5.     Porcelain Products Co.               100%     Delaware

 6.     Rowe Industries, Inc.                100%     Delaware

 7.     Talley Canada, Inc.                  100%     Canada    

 8.     Talley Defense Systems, Inc.         100%     Delaware

 9.     Talley Metals Technology, Inc.       100%     Delaware

10.     Talley Technology, Inc.              100%     Delaware

11.     Universal Propulsion Company, Inc.   100%     Delaware

12.     Waterbury Companies, Inc.            100%     Delaware











Each of the above subsidiaries is included in the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements.  Several inactive or minor corporations are not
included above because all of them, when taken in the aggregate, do not
constitute a significant subsidiary.
Table of Contents

Exhibit 4.10

[THE COCA-COLA COMPANY LETTERHEAD]

June 2, 2008

Embotelladora Central, S.A. 
República de Guatemala

Dear Sirs:

In regards to the Bottler Agreement in force and effect since March 18, 2000 (the Agreement) entered into between you and The Coca-Cola Company (the Company), we inform you that a new bottler agreement is in the final stages
of discussion and approval among the parties, which we estimate will be executed towards the middle of September 2008, hereby the Agreement is temporarily extended from March 31, 2008 until:

September 30, 2008

With the exception of said extension, all the terms and conditions of the Agreement will continue to be fully valid until the expiration of said additional term, and once the extension expires, the Bottler will no longer have the right to claim a
tacit renewal of the aforementioned Agreement.



| |                          
| | -------------------------
| | Sincerely,               
| |                          
| | THE COCA-COLA COMPANY    
| |                          
| |                          
| | /s/                      
| |                          
| | Authorized Representative

Accepted by: 
EMBOTELLADORA CENTRAL, S.A.

|                          | 
|------------------------- | 
|/s/                       | 
|                          | 
|Authorized Representative | 

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-95,315-01

EX PARTE MICHAEL EARL TRANSUE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. C-2-W012377-1540729-A IN THE 

CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 FROM TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to thirty years’

imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Transue v. State, No. 02-22-

00155-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth August 10, 2023). Applicant filed this application for a writ of

habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. SeeTEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely file a petition for discretionary

review after his direct appeal had been affirmed, although counsel had informed Applicant he would

do so. Based on the record, the trial court has determined that Applicant would have timely filed a

petition for discretionary review but for counsel’s deficient performance. 
2

Relief is granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow,

180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Applicant may file an out-of-time petition for

discretionary review of the judgment of the Second Court of Appeals in cause number 02-22-00155-

CR. Should Applicant decide to file a petition for discretionary review, he must file it with this

Court within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: January 10, 2024

Do not publish
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statement (Form F-3, No. 333-187275) of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., Comercializadora La Pureza de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., Servicios
Integrados Inmuebles del Golfo, S. de R.L. de C.V., Refrescos Victoria del Centro, S. de R.L. de C.V., Yoli de Acapulco, S de R.L. de C.V., Grupo Embotellador Cimsa, S. de R.L. de C.V. and Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V., of our reports dated
April 15, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Coca-Cola
FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. included in its Annual Report on Form 20-F, for the year ended December 31, 2015.



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|Mancera, S.C. A member
practice of Ernst & Young Global
|                                                       
|/s/ Adan Aranda Suarez                                 
|Adan Aranda Suarez                                     

Mexico City, Mexico

April 15, 2016
EXHIBIT
99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



The undersigned, Ronald Suttill, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aviva Petroleum Inc. (the Company), has executed this certification
in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the Report).



The undersigned hereby certifies that to the knowledge of the undersigned:



1.    The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
25th day of March, 2003.





| |  | /s/    Ronald SuttillRonald Suttill President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4617 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a temporary 

moratorium on the medical device excise tax. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 12, 2017 

Mr. PAULSEN (for himself, Mrs. WALORSKI, and Mr. KUSTOFF of Tennessee) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for a temporary moratorium on the medical device excise 

tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON MEDICAL DE4 VICE EXCISE TAX. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 4191 of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘2017’’ and inserting ‘‘2022’’. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4617 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to sales after December 31, 2017. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6161]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 PRAYER

  Rabbi Steven Weil, Orthodox Union, New York, New York, offered the 
following prayer:
  Master of the Universe, today we stand before You in this hallowed 
Hall, grateful for the freedoms we have been granted here, grateful for 
the men and women in this room who You imbued with wisdom and blessed 
with the courage to make the difficult decisions that will impact the 
destiny of all humanity.
  Allow the Members of Congress to be Your partners in making a more 
perfect world, and grant them the insight and the vision to always be 
mindful of the responsibilities they bear. We implore You to guide and 
strengthen them so that they can do what must be done to save the world 
from those who wish to perpetrate terrorism and evil.
  Dear God, enable them to do what must be done to plant the seeds for 
a brighter and more prosperous economic future. Dear God, support them 
in providing our children with a strong education to meet the 
challenges of tomorrow. Thank You for giving us such wonderful 
shepherds and allowing us to be their cherished flock.
  Amen.

                          ____________________
```
_


              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULES



The Board of Directors
Penn-America Group, Inc.


We consent to the use of our report dated January 17, 2003 in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of  Penn-America  Group,  Inc. Our audit also included the financial
statement  schedules  of  Penn-America  Group,  Inc.  listed in Item 15(a) as of
December  31,  2002  and  for the  year  then  ended.  These  schedules  are the
responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audit.

In our  opinion,  the  financial  statement  schedules  referred to above,  when
considered  in  relation  to the basic  financial  statements  taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-82728 and Form S-3 No. 333-33474) of Penn-America Group and its
subsidiaries  of this report and our report dated January 17, 2003, with respect
to  the  consolidated   financial   statements  of  Penn-America   Group,  Inc.,
incorporated  by  reference  in this Annual  Report (Form 10-K) for the year end
December 31, 2002.

/s/ Ernst & Young

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 28, 2003
# C_2010346EN.01001102.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Établissements Rimbaud SA v Directeur général des impôts, Directeur des services fiscaux d’Aix-en-Provence

(Case C-72/09) (1)

1

(Direct taxation - Free movement of capital - Legal persons established in a non-member State belonging to the European Economic Area - Ownership of immovable property located in a Member State - Tax on the market value of that property - Refusal of exemption - Combating tax evasion - Assessment in the light of the EEA Agreement)

2010/C 346/18

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Établissements Rimbaud SA

Applicant:

Defendants: Directeur général des impôts, Directeur des services fiscaux d’Aix-en-Provence

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour de cassation (Court of Cassation) (France) — Interpretation of Article 40 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (OJ 1994 L 1, p. 3) of 2 May 1992 — Tax on the commercial value of immoveable property situated in France — Exemption for legal persons established in France or in a State within the European Economic Area conditional on France having concluded with that State a convention on administrative assistance for the purposes of combating tax evasion and avoidance or on the fact that, under a treaty containing a clause prohibiting discrimination, those legal persons are not to be taxed more heavily than companies established in France — Refusal of tax exemption to a company established in Liechtenstein

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 40 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 does not preclude national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which exempts from the tax on the market value of immovable property located in a Member State of the European Union companies which have their seat in that Member State and which, in respect of a company which has its seat in a country belonging to the European Economic Area which is not a Member State of the European Union, makes that exemption conditional either on the existence of a convention on administrative assistance between the Member State and the non-member State for the purposes of combating tax evasion and avoidance or on the fact that, pursuant to a treaty containing a clause prohibiting discrimination on grounds of nationality, those legal persons must not be taxed more heavily than companies established in that Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 1.5.2009, p. 12.

1

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4770 

To amend the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 to permanently 

extend the moratorium on leasing in certain areas of the Gulf of Mexico. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2018 

Mr. FRANCIS ROONEY of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 

to permanently extend the moratorium on leasing in certain areas of the Gulf of Mexico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting and Secur5 ing Florida’s Coastline Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF MORATORIUM ON 

7 LEASING IN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE GULF 

8 OF MEXICO. 

9 Section 104(a) of the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security 

10 Act of 2006 (43 U.S.C. 1331 note) is amended by striking 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4770 IH

1 ‘‘Effective during’’ and all that follows through ‘‘the Sec2 retary’’ and inserting ‘‘The Secretary’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1554]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             40TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND

                                  _____
                                 

                          HON. BETTY McCOLLUM

                              of minnesota

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 19, 2012

  Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the Trust for Public 
Land on the occasion of its 40th anniversary.
  In 1972 a group of conservation-minded business professionals took 
the message of the first Earth Day to heart and saw a unique 
opportunity to meet the challenge of increasing encroachment on green 
space and natural areas. Using business sector strategies, this group 
of finance experts, real estate professionals and attorneys formed a 
trust to pool their talents and knowledge to conserve and expand the 
natural environment for the health and enjoyment of the public. The 
Trust for Public Lands was born.
  Initially the Trust for Public Land focused conservation efforts on 
urban and suburban areas. As success grew, the focus expanded to 
include working in rural areas. As a result of this hard work and 
innovation more than 4,250 park and conservation projects throughout 
the country have been completed, often by fostering public-private 
partnerships.
  During the past four decades, the Trust for Public Lands has 
developed expertise beyond the development of land trusts, to advising 
and assisting communities in the passage of conservation focused ballot 
measures, using GIS technology to better map and identify conservation 
opportunities, and combating climate change. The Trust for Public Land 
has developed a legacy of providing legal and philanthropic resources 
for community-driven conservation initiatives in Minnesota and across 
the country.
  The Trust for Public Land is an invaluable resource to Minnesota and 
communities in my congressional district through its unique approach to 
conservation. The work of the dedicated Trust for Public Land staff and 
volunteers has played a major role in protecting many of the 
spectacular parks, natural spaces, and protected watersheds which make 
our state great. I am proud to commend the Trust for Public Land on 40 
years of accomplishments and wish them much success in the years to 
come.
  Mr. Speaker, in honor of the 40th anniversary of the Trust for Public 
Land, I am pleased to submit this statement for the Congressional 
Record.

                          ____________________
```