REQUEST FOR REDESIGNATION AND 

MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR OZONE 

ATTAINMENT IN THE INDIANA 

PORTION OF THE CINCINNATIHAMILTON, OH-KY-IN 8-HOUR OZONE 

NONATTAINMENT AREA 

Dearborn County, Indiana 

(Lawrenceburg Township) 

Developed By: 

The Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

November 2009 
This page intentionally left blank
i 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1 

1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 2 

1.2 Geographical Description of Indiana's Portion of the Nonattainment Area ............................................. 2 

1.3 Status of Air Quality .................................................................................................................................. 3 

2.0 REQUIREMENTS FOR REDESIGNATION ......................................................... 3 

2.1 General ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 

2.2 Ozone Monitoring............. .................................................................................................................... 3 

2.3 Emission Inventory .................................................................................................................................... 4 

2.4 Modeling Demonstration ........................................................................................................................... 4 

2.5 Controls and Regulations .......................................................................................................................... 4 

2.6 Corrective Actions for Potential Future Violations of the Standard .......................................................... 5 

3.0 OZONE MONITORING ........................................................................................... 5 

3.1 Ozone Monitoring Network ...................................................................................................................... 5 

3.2 Ambient Ozone Monitoring Data .............................................................................................................. 7 

3.3 Quality Assurance ..................................................................................................................................... 9 

3.4 Continued Monitoring ............................................................................................................................. 10 

4.0 EMISSION INVENTORY ....................................................................................... 10 

4.1 Emission Trends ...................................................................................................................................... 10 

4.2 Base Year Inventory ................................................................................................................................ 17 

4.3 Emission Projections ............................................................................................................................... 18 

4.4 Demonstration of Maintenance ............................................................................................................... 23 

4.5 Permanent and Enforceable Emissions Reductions ................................................................................. 23 

4.6 Provisions for Future Updates ................................................................................................................. 24 

5.0 TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY BUDGETS ............................................. 24 

5.1 On-Road Emission Estimates .................................................................................................................. 24 

5.2 Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 24 

5.3 Emission Estimates .................................................................................................................................. 25 
ii 

6.0 CONTROL MEASURES AND REGULATIONS ................................................. 27 

6.1 Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) ............................................................................... 27 

6.2 Implementation of Past SIP Revisions .................................................................................................... 27 

6.3 Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Rule ................................................................................................................... 27 

6.4 Measures B eyond Clean Air Act Requirements ..................................................................................... 28 

6.5 Controls to Remain in Effect ................................................................................................................... 29 

6.6 New Source Review Provisions .............................................................................................................. 30

7.0 MODELING and METEOROLOGY ..................................................................... 30 

7.1 Summary of Modeling Results ................................................................................................................ 30 

7.2 U.S. EPA Modeling Analysis for HDE Final Rulemaking ...................................................................... 30 

7.3 U.S. EPA Modeling for Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), 2005 ........................................................... 31

7.4 LADCO's Round 5 and Round 6 Modeling for 8-Hour Ozone Standard ................................................ 32 

7.5 Summary of Existing Modeling Results .................................................................................................. 33 

7.6 Temperature Analysis for the Cincinnati, Ohio Area .............................................................................. 34 

7.7 Summary of Meteorological Conditions ................................................................................................. 37 

8.0 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ...................................................................................... 38 

8.1 Commitment to Revise Plan .................................................................................................................... 38 

8.2 Commitment for Contingency Measures ................................................................................................. 38 

8.3 Contingency Measures ............................................................................................................................ 39 

9.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .................................................................................... 40 

10.0 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................... 40
iii 

FIGURES 

3.1 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area ........................................................................... 6 

TABLES 

3.1 Monitoring Data for Kentucky’s Portion of the Nonattainment Area (Annual 4th High and Design 

Values in ppm) ............................................................................................................................................... 7 

3.2 Monitoring Data for Ohio’s Portion of the Nonattainment Area (Annual 4th High and Design Values in 

ppm) ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 

4.1 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2020 Projected NOx and VOC Emission Estimates, All 

Anthropogenic Sources in Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County (Tons Per Summer Day) .............. 22 

4.2 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2020 Projected NOx and VOC Emissions Estimates, All 

Anthropogenic Sources in the Entire Nonattainment Area (Tons Per Summer Day) ................................... 22 

5.1 Emission Estimates for On-Road Mobile Sources for the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Ozone 

Nonattainment Area ...................................................................................................................................... 25 

5.3 Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets (MVEB) for the Ohio and Indiana Portions of the CincinnatiHamilton, OH-KY-IN Ozone Nonattainment Area ...................................................................................... 25 

6.1 Trends in EGU Ozone Season NOx Emissions Statewide in Indiana ..................................................... 28 

7.1 Modeling Results: U.S. EPA HDE Rulemaking for the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN 

Nonattainment Area ...................................................................................................................................... 31 

7.2 Modeling Results From U.S. EPA for the Clean Air Interstate Rule ..................................................... 32 

7.3 Application of Round 5 RRFs (with CAIR) to Most Current Base-Year Design Values ...................... 33 

7.4 Application of Round 6 RRFs (without CAIR) to Most Current Base-Year Design Values ................. 33 

7.5 Analysis of Maximum Temperatures for the Cincinnati, Ohio Area ..................................................... 35 

7.6 Comparison of Days with 90° F and 8-hour Ozone Exceedance Days 1998-2008 ............................... 36 
iv 

GRAPHS 

3.1 2007-2009 Design Values for the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area ..................... 8 

3.2 Design Value Trends in the Cincinnati-Hamiton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area, 2004-2009 ............ 9 

4.1 NOx Point Source Emissions, Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana, 2005 and 2008 ... 11 

4.2 VOC Point Source Emissions, Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana, 2005 and 2008 . 11 

4.3 NOx Point Source Emissions, Entire Nonattainment Area, 2005 and 2008 ............................................ 12 

4.4 VOC Point Source Emissions, Entire Nonattainment Area, 2005 and 2008 .......................................... 12 

4.5 NOx Emissions from Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana Electric Generating Unit 

American Electric Power-Tanners Creek Generating Station, 1999-2008 ................................................... 14 

4.6 NOx Emissions from Entire Nonattainment Area Electric Generating Units, 1999-2008 ..................... 14 

4.7 NOx Emissions Trends, 2005 and 2008, All Anthropogenic Sources in Lawrenceburg Township, 

Dearborn County .......................................................................................................................................... 15 

4.8 VOC Emissions Trends, 2005 and 2008, All Anthropogenic Sources in Lawrenceburg Township, 

Dearborn County .......................................................................................................................................... 16 

4.9 NOx Emissions Trends, 2005 and 2008, All Anthropogenic Sources-Entire Nonattainment Area ....... 16 

4.10 VOC Emissions Trends, 2005 and 2008, All Anthropogenic Sources-Entire Nonattainment Area .... 17 

4.11 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected NOx Emissions for Lawrenceburg 

Township, Dearborn County ........................................................................................................................ 19 

4.12 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions for Lawrenceburg 

Township, Dearborn County ........................................................................................................................ 20 

4.13 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected NOx Emissions for Entire 

Nonattainment Area ...................................................................................................................................... 20 

4.14 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions for Entire 

Nonattainment Area ...................................................................................................................................... 21 

4.15 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected NOx Emissions for Lawrenceburg 

Township, Dearborn County Indiana and, Kentucky and Ohio .................................................................... 21 

4.16 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected NOx Emissions for Lawrenceburg 

Township, Dearborn County Indiana and, Kentucky and Ohio .................................................................... 22 

7.1 Actual Design Values for Cincinnati From 1996 Through 2008 ............................................................ 33

7.2 Comparison of Days with 90° F and 8-hour Ozone Exceedance Days .................................................. 37 
v 

APPENDICES 

A Air Quality System (AQS) Monitor Data Values for Cincinnati-Hamilton OHKY-IN Nonattainment Area (2004-2009) 

B Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), Point Source 

Emissions, 2005 and 2008, for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County 

Indiana and Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

C Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), All Emission 

Sources, 2005 and 2008, for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 

and Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

D Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Emissions from Electric Generating Units, Lawrenceburg 

Township, Dearborn County, Indiana and Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN 

Nonattainment Area 

E 2008 Base Year Emissions Inventory and 2015 and 2020 Projected Emissions 

Inventory for Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), 

All Emission Sources for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 

and Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

F Mobile Source Input/Output Calculation Files 

G Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM)-Area Source 

Inventory Standard Operating Procedure 

H Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO) Emission Estimates 

Technical Support Document 

I Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO) Round 5 Modeling Technical 

Support Document (Round 5 Photochemical Modeling Based on “Base M” 

Emissions Inventory, Revised Version of “Base K”) 
vi 

This page intentionally left blank
1

REQUEST FOR REDESIGNATION AND 

MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR OZONE ATTAINMENT 

IN THE INDIANA PORTION OF THE 

CINCINNATI-HAMILTON OH-KY-IN 

8-HOUR OZONE NONATTAINMENT AREA 

DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA (LAWRENCEBURG TOWNSHIP) 

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This document supports Indiana’s request that the Indiana portion (Lawrenceburg Township in 

Dearborn County, Indiana) of the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN area be redesignated from 

nonattainment to attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. In addition, the States of 

Kentucky and Ohio also intend to submit requests for their portions of the Cincinnati-Hamilton 

OH-KY-IN basic ozone nonattainment area to be redesignated from nonattainment to attainment 

for the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). The Cincinnati-Hamilton 

OH-KY-IN area has recorded three (3) years of complete, quality-assured ambient air quality 

monitoring data for the years 2007 through 2009, demonstrating attainment of the 8-hour ozone 

standard. 

Indiana’s request is based on Section 107(d)(3)(D) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), which states: 

The Governor of any State may, on the Governor’s own motion, submit to the 

Administrator a revised designation of any area or portion thereof within the State. 

Within 18 months of receipt of a complete State redesignation submittal, the 

Administrator shall approve or deny such redesignation. The submission of a 

redesignation by a Governor shall not affect the effectiveness or enforceability of the 

applicable implementation plan for the State. 

Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA establishes specific requirements to be met in order for an area 

(or portion of an area) to be considered for redesignation as follows: 

The Administrator may not promulgate a redesignation of a nonattainment area (or 

portion thereof) to attainment unless-- 

(i) the Administrator determines that the area has attained the national 

ambient air quality standard;

(ii) the Administrator has fully approved the applicable implementation plan 

for the area under section 110(k);

(iii) the Administrator determines that the improvement in air quality is due to 

permanent and enforceable reductions in emissions resulting from 

implementation of the applicable implementation plan and applicable 

Federal air pollutant control regulations and other permanent and 

enforceable reductions;
2

(iv) the Administrator has fully approved a maintenance plan for the area as 

meeting the requirements of section 175A; and

(v) the state containing such area has met all requirements applicable to the 

area under section 110 and part D. 

This document addresses each of these requirements, and provides additional information to 

support continued compliance with the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. 

1.1 Background

The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires areas designated nonattainment for the NAAQS for ozone to 

develop State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to expeditiously attain and maintain the standard. In 

1997, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) revised the air quality 

standards for ozone, replacing the 1979 1-hour standard with an 8-hour ozone standard set at 

0.08 parts per million (ppm). The standard was challenged legally and upheld by the U.S. 

Supreme Court in February of 2001. The U.S. EPA designated areas under the 8-hour ozone 

standard on April 15, 2004 as attainment, nonattainment or unclassifiable. 

The U.S. EPA designated Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County, Indiana as a portion of 

the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area (40 CFR 81.315) and classified the area 

“basic” under Subpart 1 of Part D of the CAA. The specific counties and partial counties that 

comprise the nonattainment area, as defined in 40 CFR 81.315, 40 CFR 81.318 and 40 CFR 

81.336, include Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County, Indiana; Boone, Campbell and 

Kenton counties, Kentucky; and Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton and Warren counties, Ohio. 

This designation subjected the area to the new 8-hour ozone requirements, including 

development of a plan to reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen 

oxides (NOx) and a demonstration that the area will meet the federal 8-hour air quality standard 

for ozone by June 15, 2010. 

1.2 Geographical Description of Indiana’s Portion of the Entire Nonattainment Area

Following is a brief description of the Cincinnati basic nonattainment area. 

Lawrenceburg Township, located in Dearborn County in southeast Indiana, Boone, Campbell 

and Kenton counties located in north central Kentucky and Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton 

and Warren counties located in southwestern Ohio are part of the Cincinnati metropolitan 

statistical area. This area is surrounded by the Indiana counties of Franklin, Ohio, Ripley, 

Switzerland and Union, the Kentucky counties of Bracken, Gallatin, Grant and Pendleton and the 

Ohio counties of Brown, Fayette, Greene, Highland, Montgomery and Preble. The Ohio River 

flows along the borders of Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio and the area lies within the Ohio River 

Valley. The Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Basic Nonattainment Area is depicted in Figure 

3.1. 

The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), on behalf of the State of 

Indiana, is requesting redesignation of Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana. The 

Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection (KDEP) is responsible for Boone, Campbell 
3

and Kenton counties in Kentucky. The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) is 

responsible for Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton and Warren counties in Ohio. KDEP and 

Ohio EPA are requesting redesignation of their portions of the nonattainment area from U.S. 

EPA Regions IV and V, concurrently. 

1.3 Status of Air Quality

Ozone monitoring data for the most recent three (3) years, 2007 through 2009, demonstrates that 

air quality has met the NAAQS for ozone throughout the nonattainment area, including 

Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County. This fact, accompanied by the permanent and 

enforceable decreases in emission levels discussed in Section 4.0, justifies a redesignation to 

attainment for Indiana’s portion of the nonattainment area based on Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the 

CAA. 

2.0 REQUIREMENTS FOR REDESIGNATION

2.1 General

Section 110 and Part D of the CAA list a number of requirements that must be met by 

nonattainment areas prior to consideration for redesignation to attainment. In addition, U.S. EPA 

has published detailed guidance in a document entitled Procedures for Processing Requests to 

Redesignate Areas to Attainment, issued September 4, 1992, to Regional Air Directors. This 

document is hereafter referred to as “Redesignation Guidance”. This Request for Redesignation 

and Maintenance Plan is based on the Redesignation Guidance, supplemented with additional 

guidance received from staff of the Criteria Pollutant Section of U.S. EPA Region V. The 

specific requirements for redesignation are listed below. 

2.2 Ozone Monitoring CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(i) 

1) A demonstration that the NAAQS for ozone, as published in 40 CFR 50.4, has 

been attained. Ozone monitoring data must show that violations of the ambient 

standard are no longer occurring. 

2) Ambient monitoring data quality assured in accordance with 40 CFR 58.10, have 

been recorded in the U.S. EPA Air Quality System (AQS) database, and made 

available for public view. 

3) A showing that the three-year average of the fourth highest values, based on data 

from all monitoring sites in the area or its affected downwind environs, are below 

85 parts per billion (ppb). This showing must rely on three (3) complete, 

consecutive calendar years of quality assured data. 

4) A commitment that, once redesignated, the state will continue to operate an 

appropriate monitoring network to verify the maintenance of the attainment 

status. 
4

2.3 Emission Inventory CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(iii) 

1) A comprehensive emissions inventory of the precursors of ozone completed for 

the base year. 

2) A projection of the emissions inventory to a year at least 10 years following 

redesignation. 

3) A demonstration that the projected level of emissions is sufficient to maintain the 

ozone standard. 

4) A demonstration that improvement in air quality between the year violations 

occurred and attainment was achieved is based on permanent and enforceable 

emission reductions and not on temporary adverse economic conditions or 

unusually favorable meteorology. 

5) Provisions for future annual updates of the inventory to enable tracking of the 

emission levels including an annual emission statement from major sources. 

2.4 Modeling Demonstration 

While no modeling is required for redesignating ozone nonattainment areas, IDEM has 

incorporated photochemical modeling information as part of this document to further 

support its request for Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County, Indiana, to be 

redesignated to attainment. 

2.5 Controls and Regulations CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(ii) & CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(v) 

1) A U.S. EPA approved SIP control strategy that includes Reasonably Available 

Control Technology (RACT) requirements for existing stationary sources covered 

by Control Technology Guidelines (CTG) and non-CTG RACT for all major 

sources. 

2) Evidence that control measures required in past ozone SIP revisions have been 

fully implemented. 

3) Acceptable provisions to provide for new source review. 

4) Assurances that existing controls will remain in effect after redesignation, unless 

the state demonstrates through photochemical modeling that the standard can be 

maintained without one or more controls. 

5) If appropriate, a commitment to adopt a requirement that all transportation plans 

conform with and are consistent with the SIP. 
5

2.6 Corrective Actions for Potential Future Violations of the Standard

1) A commitment to submit a revised plan eight (8) years after redesignation. 

2) A commitment to expeditiously enact and implement additional contingency 

control measures in response to exceeding specified predetermined levels 

(triggers) or in the event that future violations of the ambient standards occur. 

3) A list of potential contingency measures that would be implemented in such an 

event. 

4) A list of VOC and NOx sources potentially subject to future controls. 

3.0 OZONE MONITORING 

3.1 Ozone Monitoring Network

There are currently eleven (11) monitors measuring ozone concentrations in the CincinnatiHamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area. Three monitors are located in Kentucky and eight 

monitors are located in Ohio. Indiana does not have any ozone monitors located in 

Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County. A listing of the sites along with their annual 

fourth highest readings from 2007 through 2009 are shown in Table 3.1 and Table 3.2 and were 

retrieved from U.S. EPA’s Air Quality System (AQS) database. The locations of the monitoring 

sites for this nonattainment area are shown on Figure 3.1. Monitoring data is draft at this time 

and will be updated once it has been finalized. 
6

Figure 3.1 

Map of the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area

39-017-1004

39-061-0006

39-061-0010

21-117-0007 21-037-3002

39-017-0004

39-165-0007

39-025-0022

39-061-0040

39-027-1002

21-015-0003

BOONE

GRANT

MASON

PENDLETON

OWEN

BRACKEN

KENTON

LEWIS

CAMPBELL

GALLATIN

CARROLL

ROBERTSON HENRY HARRISON FLEMING

Butler

Brown

Clinton

Highland

Warren

Greene

Clermont

Adams

Preble

Hamilton

Fayette

Montgomery

Madison

Clark

Dearborn

Franklin

Union

Ohio

Wayne

Switzerland

Fayette

Ripley

Legend

Ozone Monitor

Interstate Higways

US Highways

Indiana Counties in Attainment

Ohio Counties in Attainment

Kentucky Counties in Attainment

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area

0 20 40 10 Miles

0 25 50 12.5 Kilometers

10/28/09
7

3.2 Ambient Ozone Monitoring Data

The following information is taken from U.S. EPA's "Guideline on Data Handling Conventions 

for the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)," EPA-454/R-98-017, 

December 1998. 

U.S. EPA requires three (3) complete years of ozone monitoring data to demonstrate attainment 

at a monitoring site. The 8-hour primary and secondary ozone ambient air quality standards are 

met at an ambient air quality monitoring site when the three-year average of the annual fourthhighest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration is less than or equal to 0.08 parts per 

million (ppm). When this occurs, the site is deemed to be in attainment. Three (3) significant 

digits must be carried out in the computations. Because the third decimal digit, in ppm, is 

rounded, 0.084 ppm is the largest concentration that is less than or equal to 0.08 ppm. Therefore, 

for the purposes of this request, the 8-hour standard is considered to be 0.085 ppm. Values 

below 0.085 ppm meet the standard, values equal to or greater than 0.085 ppm exceed the 

standard. These data handling procedures are applied on an individual basis at each monitor in 

the area. An area complies with the 8-hour ozone NAAQS only if every monitoring site in the 

area meets the NAAQS. An individual site's three-year average of the annual fourth highest 

daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration is also called the site's design value. The air 

quality design value for the area is the highest design value among all sites in the area. Table 3.1 

outlines the draft annual fourth high values and three-year design values for 2004 through 2009 

for the three active monitoring sites in Kentucky’s portion of the nonattainment area. Table 3.2 

outlines the draft annual fourth high values and three-year design values for 2004 through 2009 

for the eight active monitoring sites within Ohio’s portion of the nonattainment area. None of 

the eleven monitors within the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area has a 2007 

through 2009 design value greater than 0.082 ppm. The 2009 monitoring data is draft at this 

time and will be updated once it has been quality assured. 

DRAFT 

Table 3.1 

Monitoring Data for Kentucky’s Portion of the Nonattainment Area 

(Annual 4th High and Design Values in ppm) 

County Site ID 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2004-

2006 

2005-

2007 

2006-

2008 

2007-

2009 

Boone 21-015-0003 0.070 0.082 0.071 0.078 0.064 0.064 0.074 0.077 0.071 0.069 

Campbell 21-037-3002 0.086 0.075 0.068 0.076 

Kenton 21-117-0007 0.073 0.084 0.075 0.085 0.073 0.074 0.077 0.081 0.078 0.077 

Red text indicates values are ≥ 0.085 ppm 
8

DRAFT 

Table 3.2 

Monitoring Data for Ohio’s Portion of Nonattainment Area 

(Annual 4th High and Design Values in ppm) 

County Site ID 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2004-

2006 

2005-

2007 

2006-

2008 

2007-

2009 

Butler 39-017-0004 0.075 0.086 0.079 0.091 0.071 0.073 0.080 0.085 0.080 0.078 

Butler 39-017-1004 0.076 0.088 0.076 0.091 0.079 0.076 0.080 0.085 0.082 0.082 

Clermont 39-025-0022 0.076 0.083 0.077 0.086 0.071 0.069 0.079 0.082 0.078 0.075 

Clinton 39-027-1002 0.078 0.083 0.081 0.082 0.076 0.070 0.081 0.082 0.080 0.076 

Hamilton 39-061-0006 0.076 0.089 0.081 0.089 0.086 0.072 0.082 0.086 0.085 0.082 

Hamilton 39-061-0010 0.075 0.085 0.081 0.086 0.077 0.065 0.080 0.084 0.081 0.076 

Hamilton 39-061-0040 0.076 0.087 0.078 0.086 0.080 0.074 0.080 0.084 0.081 0.080 

Warren 39-165-0007 0.081 0.092 0.086 0.088 0.082 0.077 0.086 0.089 0.085 0.082 

Red text indicates values are ≥ 0.085 ppm 

Graph 3.1 below visually demonstrates the draft design values for this nonattainment area. The 

highest design value within the nonattainment area is 0.082 ppm. The draft design values 

calculated for the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area demonstrate that the 

NAAQS for ozone has been attained. 

DRAFT 

Graph 3.1 2007-2009 Design Values for the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN 

Nonattainment Area 

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

0.080

0.090

KY 338, KY Highland

Heights, KY

Covington,

KY

Hamilton, OH Middletow n,

OH

Batavia, OH Wilmington,

OH

Cincinnati,

OH-Grooms

Rd.

Cleves, OH Cincinnati,

OH-WM.

How ard Taft

Rd.

Lebanon, OH

21-015-0003 21-037-3002 21-117-0007 39-017-0004 39-017-1004 39-025-0022 39-027-1002 39-061-0006 39-061-0010 39-061-0040 39-165-0007

Parts per Million

2007-2009 8-Hour Ozone Standard
9

Graph 3.2 illustrates the design value trends for the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN 

nonattainment area. 

DRAFT 

Graph 3.2 Design Value Trends in the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Nonattainment 

Area, 2004-2009 

0.060

0.065

0.070

0.075

0.080

0.085

0.090

0.095

04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09

Parts per Million

21-015-0003 KY 338, KY

21-037-3002 Highland Heights, KY

21-117-0007 Covington, KY

39-017-0004 Hamilton, OH

39-017-1004 Middletow n, OH

39-025-0022 Batavia, OH

39-027-1002 Wilmington, OH

39-061-0006 Cincinnati, OH-Grooms Rd.

39-061-0010 Cleves, OH

39-061-0040 Cincinnati, OH-WM. How ard Taft

Rd.

39-165-0007 Lebanon, OH

8-Hour Ozone Standard

The above draft graph shows the trend in design values for the region over the past several years. 

A comprehensive list of the individual sites' design values over this period is in Appendix A. 

The area's design values have recently trended downward as emissions have declined due to 

programs such as the Acid Rain program and cleaner automobiles and fuels both regionally and 

locally. U.S. EPA’s rule to control nitrogen oxides from specific source categories (40 CFR 

Parts 51, 72, 75 and 96, published on October 17, 1998 and referred to as the “NOx SIP Call”) 

has significantly reduced emissions from large electric generating units (EGUs), industrial 

boilers and cement kilns. Indiana's NOx Rule was approved on June 6, 2001 (326 IAC 10-3 and 

10-4). The SIP submittals of other Midwest states were approved in this timeframe as well. An 

analysis of meteorological conditions and monitoring values is in Section 7.0 and supports the 

conclusion that attainment of the standard as of 2009 is not the result of unusually favorable 

meteorological conditions. It is expected that this downward trend will continue as the above 

programs continue. 

3.3 Quality Assurance

Ohio and Kentucky have quality assured all data shown in Appendix A in accordance with 40 

CFR 58.10 and the Quality Assurance Manual. Ohio and Kentucky have recorded the data in the 

AQS database and, thus, the data are available to the public. 
10

3.4 Continued Monitoring

Ohio and Kentucky have committed to continue monitoring ozone levels at the sites indicated in 

Table 3.1 and Appendix A. IDEM will consult with Ohio, Kentucky and the U.S. EPA Region 

IV and V staff prior to making changes to the existing monitoring network, should changes 

become necessary in the future. Ohio and Kentucky will continue to quality assure the 

monitoring data to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 58. Updates to the IDEM website1

 will 

provide real time availability of the data and knowledge of any exceedances at these monitors. 

Ohio and Kentucky will enter all data into AQS in a timely manner in accordance with federal 

guidelines. 

4.0 EMISSION INVENTORY 

U.S. EPA’s Redesignation Guidance requires the submittal of a comprehensive inventory of 

ozone precursor emissions (VOC and NOx) representative of the year when the area achieves 

attainment of the ozone air quality standard. Indiana must also demonstrate that the 

improvement in air quality between the year that violations occurred and the year that attainment 

was achieved is based on permanent and enforceable emission reductions. Other requirements 

related to the emissions inventory include a projection of the emission inventory to a year at least 

ten (10) years following redesignation, a demonstration that the projected level of emissions is 

sufficient to maintain the ozone standard and a commitment to provide future updates of the 

inventory to enable tracking of emission levels during the ten (10) year maintenance period. The 

following subsections address each of these requirements. 

4.1 Emission Trends

Point Sources

Graphs 4.1 and 4.2 show the trend within Indiana’s portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KYIN nonattainment area, in point source emissions of NOx and VOC, respectively, that generally 

correspond to the years of monitored values referenced in this plan. The point source data is 

taken from Indiana's annual emissions reporting program. Graphs and data tables of emissions 

from each point source in Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana are available in 

Appendix B. Although the Indiana data shows a slight increase in the point source emissions for 

NOx and VOC, the emissions within Indiana’s portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN 

nonattainment area are insignificant compared to the point source emissions within the entire 

nonattainment area, as can be seen in Graphs 4.15 and 4.16. Graphs 4.3 and 4.4 show the trend 

of point source emissions within the entire Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area. 

Although the emissions trend within the entire Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment 

area for NOx shows a slight increase in point source emissions, overall anthropogenic emissions 

for NOx and VOC are trending downward, as can be seen in Graphs 4.9 and 4.10. 

 

1 http://www.in.gov/idem/4670.htm
11

Graph 4.1 NOx Point Source Emissions, Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, 

Indiana, 2005 and 2008 

30.00

30.20

30.40

30.60

30.80

31.00

2005 2008

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

NOx

Graph 4.2 VOC Point Source Emissions, Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, 

Indiana, 2005 and 2008 

-

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

2005 2008 Year

Tons Per Summer Day

VOC
12

Graph 4.3 NOx Point Source Emissions, Entire Nonattainment Area, 2005 and 2008 

30.00

50.00

70.00

90.00

110.00

130.00

150.00

170.00

190.00

2005 2008

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

NOx

Graph 4.4 VOC Point Source Emissions, Entire Nonattainment Area, 2005 and 2008 

-

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

16.00

2005 2008

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

VOC
13

EGU Sources

Graph 4.5 shows the trend in NOx emissions from the American Electric Power (AEP)-Tanners 

Creek Generating Station in Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana. Graph 4.6 

depicts the trends in NOx emissions from EGUs for the entire nonattainment area. While ozone 

and its precursors are also transported into this region from outside areas, this information does 

provide some indication of the impact that the EGUs located in the nonattainment area may have 

on the entire nonattainment area. The emissions are decreasing substantially in response to 

national programs affecting all EGUs, such as the Acid Rain program and the NOx SIP Call. 

Other sectors of the inventory also impact ozone formation, but large regional sources such as 

EGUs have a substantial impact on the formation of ozone. Graphs and data tables of emissions 

from each EGU source are available in Appendix D. 

These data were taken from U.S. EPA's Clean Air Markets database2. Data are available sooner 

for these units than other point sources in the inventory because of the NOx SIP Call budget and 

trading requirements. Information from 2003 is significant because some EGUs started 

operation of their NOx SIP Call controls in order to generate Early Reduction Credits for their 

future year NOx budgets. The first season of the NOx SIP Call budget period began May 31, 

2004. 

As part of the NOx SIP Call, the states were required to adopt into their rules a budget for all 

large EGUs. Indiana’s budget is found in Indiana’s rules at 326 IAC 10-4. The budget 

represents a statewide cap on NOx emissions. Although each unit is allocated emissions based 

upon historic heat input, utilities can meet this budget by over-controlling certain units or 

purchasing credits from the market to account for overages at other units. To summarize, NOx

emissions have dramatically decreased over the years as represented on these graphs. These 

emissions, capped by the state rule, should remain at least this low through the maintenance 

period covered by this request. 

 

2

 http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/
14

Graph 4.5 NOx Emissions from Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 

Electric Generating Unit American Electric Power-Tanners Creek Generating Station, 

1999-2008 

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

1999200020012002200320042005200620072008

Year

Tons per Year

NOx

Graph 4.6 NOx Emissions from Entire Nonattainment Area Electric Generating 

Units, 1999-2008 

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

1999200020012002200320042005200620072008

Year

Tons per Year

NOx
15

All Anthropogenic Sources

Periodic inventories, which include emissions from all sectors (mobile, area, nonroad and point 

sources) were prepared for 2005 and will be prepared soon for 2008. The 2008 point source data 

for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana is taken from Indiana’s annual 

emissions reporting program. All other emission sources were extrapolated from Indiana’s 2005 

periodic inventory submitted to U.S. EPA. Graphs 4.7 and 4.8 show the trends for the total 

emissions for NOx and VOC for all anthropogenic source categories within Dearborn County, 

and Graphs 4.9 and 4.10 show the trends for the entire nonattainment area, which also roughly 

follow the years of monitored air quality trends discussed in Section 3.0. Although Indiana’s 

portion of the nonattainment area shows an increase in VOC, overall anthropogenic emissions in 

the entire nonattainment area have decreased as can be seen in Graph 4.10. Graphs and data 

tables of emissions from each source category are available in Appendix C. IDEM received 

emissions information for the Ohio and Kentucky portions of the nonattainment area for the 

years 2005, 2008, 2015 and 2020 from the Ohio EPA and Kentucky Division for Air Quality. 

Graph 4.7 NOx Emissions Trends, 2005 and 2008, All Anthropogenic Sources in 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County 

31.00

32.00

33.00

34.00

35.00

2005 2008

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

NOx
16

Graph 4.8 VOC Emissions Trends, 2005 and 2008, All Anthropogenic Sources in 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County 

6.90

7.00

7.10

7.20

7.30

7.40

7.50

7.60

2005 2008

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

VOC

Graph 4.9 NOx Emissions Trends, 2005 and 2008, All Anthropogenic Sources-Entire 

Nonattainment Area 

200.00

250.00

300.00

350.00

400.00

2005 2008 Year

Tons Per Summer Day

NOx
17

Graph 4.10 VOC Emissions Trends, 2005 and 2008, All Anthropogenic Sources-Entire 

Nonattainment Area 

170.00

175.00

180.00

185.00

190.00

195.00

200.00

205.00

210.00

215.00

220.00

2005 2008

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

VOC

4.2 Base Year Inventory

IDEM prepared a comprehensive inventory for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, 

including area, mobile, nonroad and point sources for precursors of ozone (VOC and NOx) for 

the base year 2008. 

• Area sources were extrapolated from the Indiana 2005 periodic inventory submitted to U.S. 

EPA. 

• Mobile source emissions were calculated from MOBILE6.2 produced emission factors and 

data extracted from the region’s travel-demand model. Several adjustments were made to the 

travel demand model and calculation methodology since 1996. As a result, since the 1996, 

1999 and 2002 emission inventories were prepared with slightly different methodology, they 

do not provide a true comparison with the 2004 through 2020 estimates. The fluctuations 

referenced in the data, particularly 1996 through 2002 NOx emissions, are due to changes in 

the calculation methodology, not necessarily actual mobile source emissions. 

• Point source information was compiled from IDEM’s 2008 annual emissions statement 

database and the 2008 U.S. EPA Air Markets acid rain database3

. 

• Biogenic emissions are not included in these summaries. 

• Nonroad emissions for 2008 were extrapolated from the 2005 National Emissions Inventory 

(NEI). To address concerns about the accuracy of some of the categories in U.S. EPA’s 

nonroad emissions model, the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO), 

 

3 http://camddataandmaps.epa.gov/gdm/
18

contracted with two (2) companies to review the base data and make recommendations. One 

of the contractors also estimated emissions for two (2) categories not included in U.S. EPA’s 

nonroad model and reviewed model inputs for another. Emissions were estimated for 

commercial marine vessels and railroads. Recreational motorboat population and spatial 

surrogates (used to assign emissions to each county) were significantly updated. The 

populations for the construction equipment category were reviewed and updated based upon 

surveys completed in the Midwest and the temporal allocation for agricultural sources was 

also updated by the other contractor. A new nonroad estimation model was provided by U.S. 

EPA for the 2002 analysis. The 1996 and 1999 nonroad emission estimates were generated 

by a previous U.S. EPA model, and thus, cannot provide a true comparison. The fluctuations 

referenced in the data could be due to changes in the model and methodology and do not 

necessarily reflect changes in emissions. 

IDEM received emissions information for the Ohio and Kentucky portions of the nonattainment 

area for the years 2005, 2008, 2015 and 2020 from the Ohio EPA and Kentucky Division for Air 

Quality. This inventory was prepared using similar methodologies. 

Appendices B, C and E contain data tables and graphs of all these emissions. 

4.3 Emission Projections

In consultation with the U.S. EPA and other stakeholders, IDEM selected the year 2020 as the 

maintenance year for this redesignation request. This document contains projected NOx and 

VOC emissions inventories for 20154 and 20205. 

IDEM, with assistance from LADCO, prepared NOx and VOC emission projections for 2015 and 

2020 for Indiana’s portion of the nonattainment area. IDEM received emissions information for 

Ohio and Kentucky portions of the nonattainment area for the years 2005, 2008, 2015 and 2020 

from the Ohio EPA and Kentucky Division for Air Quality. 

The detailed NOx and VOC inventory information for the entire nonattainment area for 2015 and 

2020 is in Appendix E. NOx and VOC emission trends are an important gauge for continued 

compliance with the ozone standard. Therefore, IDEM performed an initial comparison of the 

NOx and VOC inventories for the base year (2008), interim year (2015) and maintenance year 

(2020) for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County. Graphs 4.11 and 4.12 visually compare 

the 2008 (base year) estimated NOx and VOC emissions with the 2015 and 2020 projected 

emissions for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, and Graphs 4.13 and 4.14 visually 

compare the 2008 (base year) estimated NOx and VOC emissions with the 2015 and 2020 

projected emissions for the entire nonattainment area. Graphs 4.15 and 4.16 visually compare 

the 2008 (base year) estimated NOx and VOC emissions with the 2015 and 2020 projected 

emissions for Lawrenceburg Township to the Kentucky and Ohio portions of the nonattainment 

area. Mobile source emission inventories are described in Section 5.0. In addition to LADCO’s 

 

4

 In Section 4.3 all emissions projections for area, non-road, and point/EGU emission projections for the year 2015 

are based on 2009 emission estimates. 

5

 In Section 4.3 all emission projections for area, non-road, and point/EGU emission projections for the year 2020 

are based on 2018 emission estimates. 
19

estimates, NOx emissions were projected based on the statewide EGU NOx budgets from the 

Indiana NOx rule. Although Indiana’s portion of the nonattainment area shows a slight increase 

in emissions from 2015 to 2020 for both NOx and VOC, overall anthropogenic emissions in the 

entire nonattainment area have decreased as can be seen in Graph 4.13 and Graph 4.14 

Graph 4.11 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected NOx Emissions for 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County 

31.40

31.60

31.80

32.00

32.20

32.40

32.60

32.80

33.00

33.20

2008 2015 2020

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

NOX
20

Graph 4.12 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions 

for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County 

6.50

6.60

6.70

6.80

6.90

7.00

7.10

7.20

7.30

7.40

7.50

7.60

2008 2015 2020

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

VOC

Graph 4.13 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected NOx Emissions for 

the Entire Nonattainment Area 

270.00

280.00

290.00

300.00

310.00

320.00

330.00

340.00

350.00

2008 2015 2020

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

NOX
21

Graph 4.14 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions 

for the Entire Nonattainment Area 

-

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

140.00

160.00

180.00

200.00

2008 2015 2020

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

VOC

Graph 4.15 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected NOx Emissions for 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County Indiana and Kentucky and Ohio 

-

50.00

100.00

150.00

200.00

250.00

2008 2015 2020

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

Lawrenceburg Township, IN Kentucky Ohio
22

Graph 4.16 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions 

for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County Indiana and Kentucky and Ohio 

-

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

140.00

160.00

2008 2015 2020 Year

Tons Per Summer Day

Lawrenceburg Township, IN Kentucky Ohio

Table 4.1 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2020 Projected NOx and VOC Emission 

Estimates, All Anthropogenic Sources in Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, 

Indiana (Tons per Summer Day) 

 

 2008 2020 Change % Decrease 

NOX 33.09 32.56 -0.53 1.60% 

VOC 7.49 6.96 -0.53 7.07% 

Table 4.2 Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2020 Projected NOx and VOC Emission 

Estimates, All Anthropogenic Sources in the Entire Nonattainment Area (Tons Per 

Summer Day) 

 

 2008 2020 Change % Decrease 

NOX 344.32 297.25 -47.07 13.67% 

VOC 187.66 137.14 -50.52 26.92% 

VOC emissions within Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County are projected to decline by 

7.07% between 2008 and 2020 and by 26.92% in the entire nonattainment area. NOx emissions 

within Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County are projected to decline by 1.60% between 

2008 and 2020 and by 13.67% in the entire nonattainment area. Emission reduction benefits 
23

from U.S. EPA rules covering the NOx SIP Call, Tier 2 Motor Vehicle Emissions Standards and 

Gasoline Sulfur Control Requirements6

, Heavy-Duty Highway Engine Rule7 and Nonroad 

Diesel Engine Rule8 are factored into the changes. Further, due to implementation of the NOx

SIP Call across the eastern United States, NOx and ozone levels entering this area will decrease. 

4.4 Demonstration of Maintenance

Ambient air quality data from all monitoring sites indicate that air quality in the entire 

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area met the NAAQS for ozone in 2009. U.S. 

EPA’s Redesignation Guidance (pg. 9) states, “A state may generally demonstrate maintenance 

of the NAAQS by either showing that future emissions of a pollutant or its precursors will not 

exceed the level of the attainment inventory, or by modeling to show that the future mix of 

sources and emissions rates will not cause a violation of the NAAQS.” Emissions projections 

outlined in Section 4.0 of this document clearly illustrate that VOC and NOx emissions in 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County and the entire nonattainment area will continue to 

decline between 2008 (base year) and 2020. Section 7.0 further discusses the implications of 

these emissions trends and provides an analysis to support these conclusions. Therefore, air 

quality should meet the ozone NAAQS through the projected years of 2015 and 2020. 

In Indiana, major point sources in all counties are required to submit air emissions information 

once every three (3) years or annually if the VOC potential to emit is greater than 250 tons per 

year or the NOx potential to emit is greater than 2,500 tons per year, in accordance with Indiana’s 

Emission Statement Rule at 326 IAC 2-6. IDEM prepares a new periodic inventory for all ozone 

precursor emission sectors every three (3) years. These ozone precursor inventories will be 

prepared for 2011, 2014 and 2017, as necessary, to comply with the inventory reporting 

requirements established in the CAA. Emissions information will be compared to the 2008 base 

year and the 2020 projected maintenance year inventories to assess emission trends, as 

necessary, to assure continued compliance with the ozone standard. 

4.5 Permanent and Enforceable Emissions Reductions

Permanent and enforceable reductions of VOCs and NOx have resulted in attainment of the 8-

hour ozone standard. Some of these reductions were due to the application of Reasonably 

Available Control Technology (RACT) rules and some were due to the application of tighter 

federal standards on new vehicles. In addition, Title IV of the Clean Air Act and the NOx SIP 

Call required the reduction of NOx from utility sources. Section 6.0 identifies the emission 

control measures specific to Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, as well as the 

implementation status of each measure. 

 

6 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2000/February/Day-10/a19a.htm

7 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1997/October/Day-21/a27494.htm

8 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1998/October/Day-23/a24836.htm
24

4.6 Provisions for Future Updates 

As required by Section 175A(b) of the CAA, Indiana commits to submit to the Administrator, 

eight (8) years after redesignation, an additional revision of this SIP. The revision will contain 

Indiana's plan for maintaining the national primary ozone air quality standard for ten (10) years 

beyond the first ten (10) year period after redesignation. 

5.0 MOBILE SOURCE EMISSION BUDGETS

U.S. EPA requirements outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e) (4) stipulate that mobile source emissions 

budgets for VOC and NOx be established as part of a State Implementation Plan (SIP). The 

mobile source emissions budgets are necessary to demonstrate conformance of transportation 

plans and improvement programs with the SIP. The following is a summary of the detailed 

mobile input and output calculation files located in Appendix F. 

5.1 On-Road Emission Estimates

The Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments (OKI) is the Metropolitan 

Planning Organization (MPO) for the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN area which includes 

Dearborn County in Indiana; Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton, and Warren Counties in Ohio; 

as well as, Boone, Campbell and Kenton Counties in Kentucky. This organization maintains a 

travel demand forecasting model that is used to simulate the traffic in the area and to predict 

what traffic would be in future years given growth expectations. The model is used mostly to 

identify where travel capacity will be needed and to determine the infrastructure requirements 

necessary to meet that need. It is also used to support the calculation of mobile source 

emissions. The travel demand forecasting model is used to predict the total daily vehicle miles 

traveled (VMT) and the U.S. EPA software program referred to as MOBILE6.2 is used to 

produce emission factors to calculate the emissions per mile. The product of these two outputs, 

once combined, is the total amount of pollution emitted by on-road vehicles for the particular 

analyzed area. 

5.2 Overview 

Broadly described, MOBILE6.2 is used to generate “emission factors”, which are the average 

emissions per mile (grams/mile) for ozone precursors: NOx and VOC. There are numerous 

variables that can affect the emission factors. The vehicle-fleet (vehicles on the road) age and 

the vehicle types have a major affect on the emission factors. The facility-type the vehicles are 

traveling on (MOBILE6.2 facility-types are Freeway, Arterial, Local and Ramp) and the vehicle 

speeds also affect the emission factor values. Meteorological factors such as air temperature and 

humidity affect the emission factors, as does fuel type, such as low RVP gasoline. These data 

are estimated using the best available data to generate emission factors for the appropriate ozone 

precursors, NOx and VOC. After emission factors are generated, the emission factor(s) must be 

multiplied by the VMT to determine the quantity of vehicle-related emissions. This information 

derives from the travel demand model (TDM). 
25

It should be noted that each year analyzed will have different emission factors, volumes, speeds 

and likely some additional links. MOBILE6.2 input and output files can all be found in 

Appendix F. 

5.3 Emission Estimations

Table 5.1 outlines the on-road emission estimates for the entire nonattainment area for the years 

2005, 2008 (Attainment Year), 2015 (Interim Year) and 2020 (Horizon Year). The following 

emission estimates are based on the actual TDM network runs for the years 2005, 2008, 2015 

and 2020. 

Table 5.1 

Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources 

for the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Ozone Nonattainment Area 

Cincinnati-Hamilton OHKY-IN NA Area 2005 2008 2015 2020 

VOC (tons/day) 69.43 55.47 35.35 32.14 

NOx (tons/day) 136.73 113.45 51.04 38.17 

Lawrenceburg Township 

(Dearborn County Indiana) 

subtotal 

 

VOC (tons/day) 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.42 

NOx (tons/day) 1.44 1.14 0.60 0.42 

Lawrenceburg Township 

subtotal % 

VOC (tons/day) 1.44 1.35 1.41 1.31 

NOx (tons/day) 1.05 1.00 1.18 1.10 

Table 5.2 contains the 2015 and 2020 regional motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Ohio and 

Indiana portions of the nonattainment area. 

Table 5.2 

Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets (MVEB) for the 

Ohio and Indiana Portions of the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-Ky-IN Ozone Nonattainment 

Area 

2015 2020 

VOC (tons/day) 31.73 28.82 

NOx (tons/day) 49.00 34.39 

This document creates an Interim Year Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets (MVEB) for 2015 and 

a Horizon Year MVEB for 2020 for the Ohio and Indiana portions of the nonattainment area. 
26

These budgets are based on the 2008 on-road emission inventory used to support photochemical 

modeling for the same year, and has incorporated a fifteen (15) percent safety margin as 

described below. 

Initial Base M (2005) CAMx modeling results indicated a worst case future design value in the 

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area of 83 ppb. In an effort to accommodate 

future variations in TDMs and vehicle miles traveled forecast when no change to the network is 

planned, Indiana consulted with the interagency consultation group, including U.S. EPA – 

Region 5, to determine a reasonable approach to address this variation. Based on this discussion, 

a fifteen (15) percent safety margin was approved and has been added to the MVEB for the Ohio 

and Indiana portions of this nonattainment area. 

A fifteen (15) percent safety margin is appropriate because; 1) there is an acknowledged 

potential variation in VMT forecast and potential estimated mobile source emissions due to 

expected modifications to TDM and mobile emissions models; and 2) the total decrease in 

emissions from all sources is sufficient to accommodate this fifteen (15) percent allocation of 

safety margin to mobile sources while still continuing to maintain total emissions in the 

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN area well below the 2008 attainment level of emissions. This 

fifteen (15) percent safety margin was calculated by adding a straight-line fifteen (15) percent to 

the mobile source emission estimates for the years 2015 and 2020. Safety margin, as defined by 

the conformity rule, looks at the total emissions from all sources in the nonattainment area. The 

actual allocation is less than fifteen (15) percent of the total emission reduction from all sources 

as can be seen from Tables 4.1 and 4.2. 

In summary, for all three states combined, the mobile budget safety margin allocation translates 

into: 

• An allocation of 6.14 tons/day for VOC and 9.39 tons/day for NOx for 2015; and 

• An allocation of 6.76 tons/day for VOC and 9.49 tons/day for NOx for 2020. 

40 CFR 93.101 defines safety margin as the amount by which the total projected emissions from 

all sources of a given pollutant area less than the total emissions that would satisfy the applicable 

requirement for reasonable further progress, attainment, or maintenance. When compared to the 

overall safety margin as defined by 40 CFR 93.101, it is evident this allocation to mobile sources 

is significantly below the total safety margin for all sources in the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KYIN area as detailed in Tables 4.1 and 4.2. 

While Indiana believes that this is sufficient to support the requested increase, Indiana and its 

partners will be conducting additional air quality modeling which will include the adjusted onroad mobile emissions as well as any additional corrections and modifications that may be 

necessary due to the constant review and evaluation of the model inputs. 

Appendix F of this document provides a detailed description of how the above budgets were 

established and also documents the consultation and coordination process among the effected 

environmental and transportation planning agencies in establishing the budgets. 
27

6.0 CONTROL MEASURES AND REGULATIONS 

This section provides specific information on the control measures implemented in 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, including CAA requirements and additional state or 

local measures implemented beyond CAA requirements. 

6.1 Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT)

As required by Section 172 of the CAA, in the mid-1990s, Indiana promulgated rules requiring 

RACT for emissions of VOCs. There were no specific rules required by the CAA such as RACT 

for existing sources beyond statewide rules. Statewide RACT rules have applied to all new 

sources locating in Indiana since that time. The Indiana rules are found in 326 IAC 8. The 

following is a listing of applicable rules: 

326 IAC 8-1 Best Available Control Technology-New Facilities 

326 IAC 8-2 Surface Coating Emission Limitations 

326 IAC 8-3 Solvent Degreasing Operations 

326 IAC 8-4 Petroleum Sources 

326 IAC 8-5 Miscellaneous Operations 

326 IAC 8-6 Organic Solvent Emission Limitations 

Additional rules specifically applicable to Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County are 

summarized in Section 6.4. 

6.2 Implementation of Past SIP Revisions

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County was not required to develop an Attainment 

Demonstration SIP for the 1-hour NAAQS. The area was designated nonattainment for 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS in April 2004. Indiana previously submitted an Attainment Demonstration for 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County on June 13, 2007, but the area has now attained the 

standard. Emissions of VOCs are regulated by applicable statewide provisions of 326 IAC 8. 

6.3 Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Rule

The U.S. EPA NOx SIP Call required twenty-two states to adopt rules that would result in 

significant emission reductions from large EGUs, industrial boilers and cement kilns in the 

eastern United States. Indiana adopted this rule in 2001. Beginning in 2004, this rule accounts 

for a reduction of approximately thirty-one percent (31%) of all NOx emissions statewide 

compared to the previous uncontrolled years. 

Twenty-one other states have also adopted these rules. The result is that significant reductions 

have occurred regionally and upwind within the nonattainment area because of the number of 

affected units within the region. Graphs 4.5 and 4.6 show that emissions covered by this 

program have been trending downward since 1999. Table 6.1, compiled from data taken from 

the U.S. EPA Clean Air Markets website, quantifies the gradual NOx reductions that have 

occurred in Indiana as a result of Title IV (Acid Rain) of the CAA and the NOx SIP Call Rule. 
28

Further, U.S. EPA more recently published Phase II of the NOx SIP Call that established a 

budget for large (greater than 1 ton per day emissions) stationary internal combustion engines. 

This rule decreases emissions statewide from natural gas compressor stations by 4,263 tons 

during the ozone season. The Indiana Phase II NOx SIP Call rule became effective February 26, 

2006 and implementation began in 2007. 

TABLE 6.1 Trends in EGU Ozone Season NOx Emissions Statewide in Indiana 

Statewide Indiana NOx Emissions from EGUs 

Year NOx Emissions (Tons per Year) 

1999 347,216.5 

2000 334,522.1 

2001 315,419.7 

2002 281,146.1 

2003 260,980.0 

2004 224,311.3 

2005 207,981.6 

2006 202,728.0 

2007 196,553.1 

2008 196,134.5 

Budget 2009-2014 108,935.0 

6.4 Measures Beyond Clean Air Act Requirements

 

Reductions in ozone precursor emissions have occurred, or are anticipated to occur, as a result of 

local and federal control programs. These additional control measures include: 

Tier 2 Emission Standards for Vehicles and Gasoline Sulfur Standards9

In February 2000, U.S. EPA finalized a federal rule to significantly reduce emissions 

from light-duty trucks, including SUVs to meet an average standard of 0.07 grams of 

NOx per mile. Implementation began in 2004 and was completed in 2007. The Tier 2 

standards also cover passenger vehicles over 8,500 pounds gross vehicle weight rating 

(large pickup trucks and SUVs), which are not covered by the current Tier 1 standards. 

For these vehicles, the standards were phased in beginning in 2008, with full compliance 

in 2009. The new standards require vehicles to be 77% to 95% cleaner than those on the 

road prior to the new standards. The standards also reduced the sulfur content of gasoline 

to 30 ppm beginning in January 2006. 

Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines10

In July 2000, U.S. EPA issued a final rule for Heavy Duty Highway Engines, a program 

that includes low-sulfur diesel fuel standards that took effect in 2004. A second phase of 

standards and testing procedures took effect in 2007 that reduced highway diesel fuel 

 

9 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2000/February/Day-10/a19a.htm

10http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1997/October/Day-21/a27494.htm 
29

sulfur content to 15 ppm. The total program is expected to achieve a 95% reduction in 

NOx from diesel trucks and buses, a large sector of the mobile sources NOx inventory. 

Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule11

In May 2004, U.S. EPA issued the Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule. This rule applies to 

diesel engines used in industries such as construction, agriculture and mining. It also 

contains a cleaner fuel standard similar to the highway diesel program. The new 

standards will cut emissions from nonroad diesel engines by over ninety percent (90%). 

Nonroad diesel equipment, as described in this rule, currently accounts for forty-seven 

percent (47%) of diesel particulate matter (PM) and twenty-five percent (25%) of 

nitrogen oxides (NOx) from mobile sources nationwide. Sulfur levels will be reduced in 

nonroad diesel fuel by ninety-nine percent (99%) from current levels, from approximately 

three thousand (3,000) parts per million (ppm) now to (fifteen) 15 ppm in 2015. New 

engine standards take effect, based on engine horsepower, starting in 2008. 

Together, these rules will substantially reduce local and regional sources of ozone precursors. 

The modeling analyses discussed in Section 7.0 include these rules and show the ozone 

concentrations expected to result from their implementation. 

Local Reductions

Several permanent and enforceable reductions in emissions from local point sources have 

occurred beyond Clean Air Act Requirements. 

The American Electric Power (AEP) -Tanner’s Creek Generating Station power plant, located in 

Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County, is covered by a consent decree and several, but 

not all, electric generating units will have to apply controls. Currently, the power plant is 

controlled by low NOx burner technology (dry bottom only) and overfire air. AEP-Tanner’s 

Creek Generating Station will be installing selective non-catalytic reduction systems on three of 

its four electric generating units, with operation to begin in early 2010. This will achieve an 

additional 30% reduction in NOx. The reductions from facilities like the AEP-Tanners Creek 

power plant will help improve air quality in the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment 

area. 

6.5 Controls to Remain in Effect

Indiana commits to maintaining the aforementioned control measures after redesignation. 

Indiana commits that any changes to its rules or emission limits applicable to VOC and/or NOx

sources, as required for maintenance of the ozone standard in Lawrenceburg Township, 

Dearborn County, will be submitted to U.S. EPA for approval as a SIP revision. 

Indiana, through IDEM’s Office of Air Quality (OAQ) and the Office of Legal Counsel has the 

legal authority and necessary resources to actively enforce any violations of its rules or permit 

provisions. After redesignation, it intends to continue enforcing all rules that relate to the 

emission of ozone precursors in Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County. 

 

11 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1998/October/Day-23/a24836.htm
30

6.6 New Source Review Provisions

Indiana has a long standing and fully implemented New Source Review (NSR) program that is 

outlined in 326 IAC 2. The rule includes the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) 

permitting program in 326 IAC 2-2. Indiana's PSD program was conditionally approved on 

March 3, 2003 (68 FR 9892) and received final approval on May 20, 2004 (69 FR 29071) by 

U.S. EPA as part of the SIP. 

Any facility that is not listed in the 2005 emission inventory, or for the closing of which credit 

was taken in demonstrating attainment, will not be allowed to construct, reopen, modify, or 

reconstruct without meeting all applicable permit rule requirements. The review process will be 

identical to that used for new sources. Once the area is redesignated, Indiana will implement 

NSR for major sources through the PSD program, which requires an air quality analysis to 

evaluate whether the new source will threaten the NAAQS. 

7.0 MODELING AND METEOROLOGY 

7.1 Summary of Modeling Results for National Emission Control Strategies in Final Rulemakings

Although U.S. EPA’s Redesignation Guidance does not require modeling for ozone 

nonattainment areas seeking redesignation, extensive modeling has been performed covering the 

Cincinnati, Ohio region to determine the effect of national emission control strategies on ozone 

levels. These modeling analyses determined that the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN 8-hour 

ozone nonattainment area is significantly impacted by ozone and ozone precursor transport and 

regional NOx reductions have helped the area attain the 8-hour standard. These results show that 

even in the absence of the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), the area will continue to attain the 

standard. Modeling results with or without CAIR do not differ significantly because the 

summertime CAIR program is essentially the same as the NOx SIP Call, which was already 

included in the modeling analysis. 

7.2 U.S. EPA Modeling Analysis for HDE Final Rulemaking

U.S. EPA conducted modeling for Tier II vehicles and low-sulfur fuels. This analysis was 

performed in 2000 to support final rulemaking for the Heavy Duty Engine (HDE) and Vehicle 

Standards and Highway Diesel Fuel and its expected impact on ozone levels. “Technical 

Support Document for the Heavy Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards and Highway Diesel Fuel 

Sulfur Control Requirements: Air Quality Modeling Analyses” (EPA420-R-00-028) was 

referenced for support of this ozone redesignation for the Cincinnati nonattainment area. Base 

year emissions from 1996 were modeled for three ozone episodes: June 12-24, 1995; July 5-15, 

1995; and August 7-21, 1995. Results of this modeling show that ozone impacts from these fuel 

emission control measures, as well as the NOx SIP Call, would be substantial in the CincinnatiHamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area. Relative Response Factors (RRF) were calculated for 

each monitor in the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area for future years 2007 

and 2020. IDEM has applied these RRFs to the most recent three-year (2007-2009) design 

values. The resulting future year design values for 2007 and 2020 were calculated and are 
31

shown below in Table 7.1. The 2007 modeled future year design values for all monitors in the 

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area are in attainment of the 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS of 0.08 ppm. 

Table 7.1 

Modeling Results: U.S. EPA HDE Rulemaking for the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN 

Nonattainment Area

Monitor ID Monitor Name County 

Design 

Value 

2006-

2008 

Modeled 

Relative 

Response 

Factor (RRFs) 

Future 

Design 

Value 

Modeled 

 Relative 

Response 

Factor (RRFs) 

Future 

Design 

Value 

 2007 Base 2007 2020 Base 2020

390170004 Cincinnati CMSA Butler 0.080 0.8957 0.072 0.8710 0.074 

390171004 Cincinnati CMSA Butler 0.082 0.8816 0.072 0.8507 0.069 

390250020 Cincinnati CMSA Clermont 0.078 0.8834 0.069 0.8600 0.068 

390271002 Cincinnati CMSA Clinton 0.080 0.8560 0.068 0.8191 0.067 

390610006 Cincinnati CMSA Hamilton 0.085 0.8949 0.076 0.8771 0.074 

390610010 Cincinnati CMSA Hamilton 0.081 0.8826 0.071 0.8749 0.071 

390610037 Cincinnati CMSA Hamilton 0.081 0.9095 0.074 0.8969 0.073 

391650006 Cincinnati CMSA Warren 0.085 0.8851 0.075 0.8576 0.063 

210150003 Cincinnati CMSA- KY Boone 0.071 0.8478 0.060 0.8205 0.071 

210371001 Cincinnati CMSA- KY Campbell 0.081 0.8804 0.073 0.8804 0.067 

211170007 Cincinnati CMSA- KY Kenton 0.078 0.8940 0.069 0.8787 0.074 

7.3 U.S. EPA Modeling for Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), 2005

On March 10, 2005, the U.S. EPA finalized CAIR. NOx emissions from power plants will be cut 

by 1.7 million tons by 2009 and emissions will be reduced by 1.3 million tons in 2015 in 28 

eastern states and the District of Columbia. Compared to a 2003 baseline, Indiana will reduce 

NOx emissions by 113,000 tons by 2009 and 149,000 tons by 2015. To support this rulemaking, 

U.S. EPA first conducted a base case future year modeling run to show future year 

concentrations resulting from existing emissions controls and then conducted future year 

modeling with emission reductions attributed to CAIR. Results in Table 7.2 show what the base 

case modeled results without CAIR (base) and with CAIR’s emission reductions included. The 

modeling was based on 1999 – 2003 (1999-2001, 2000-2002 and 2001-2003) design values. 

Future year modeling was conducted, including the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN 

nonattainment area, and the future year design values for 2010 and 2015 were evaluated for 

attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Results of the base case future year modeling and 

future year modeling with CAIR show that the area will attain the 8-hour ozone NAAQS in 2010 

under both scenarios with modeled concentrations below 0.085 ppm and modeled concentrations 

decreasing further by 2015. On December 23, 2008, CAIR was remanded without vacatur by the 

D.C. Circuit Court. 
32

Table 7.2 

Modeling Results from U.S. EPA for the Clean Air Interstate Rule

County MSA/CMSA 

Design Value 

(ppm) 

Future Design Value 

(ppm) 

Future Design Value 

(ppm) 

 1999-2003 2010 Base 2010 CAIR 2015 Base 2015 CAIR 

Butler Cincinnati, OH – KY 0.0890 0.0782 0.0780 0.0752 0.0736 

Clermont Cincinnati, OH – KY 0.0900 0.0781 0.0780 0.0751 0.0725 

Clinton Cincinnati, OH – KY 0.0957 0.0817 0.0814 0.0774 0.0757 

Hamilton Cincinnati, OH - KY 0.0893 0.0788 0.0786 0.0758 0.0743 

Warren Cincinnati, OH – KY 0.0920 0.0802 0.0800 0.0766 0.0751 

Boone Cincinnati, OH – KY 0.0853 0.0731 0.0731 0.0710 0.0680 

Campbell Cincinnati, OH – KY 0.0925 0.0816 0.0815 0.0788 0.0768 

Kenton Cincinnati, OH – KY 0.0863 0.0757 0.0756 0.0733 0.0713 

7.4 LADCO’s Round 5 and Round 6 Modeling for 8-Hour Ozone Standard

LADCO recently performed updated Comprehensive Air Quality Model (CAMx) modeling for 

ozone, referred to as “Round 5 and Round 6”, which used the most recent emissions inventories 

and model updates. This modeling was performed to support attainment demonstrations for the 

five-state LADCO region. The photochemical model used by LADCO and Indiana for the 8-

hour ozone standard analysis is CAMx, Version 4.5, developed by Environ. This model has 

been accepted by U.S. EPA as an approved air quality model for regulatory analysis and 

attainment demonstrations. Requirements of 40 CFR 51.112 as well as the “Guidance on the 

Use of Models and Other Analyses in Attainment Demonstrations for the 8-Hour Ozone 

NAAQS” (EPA-454/R-05-002, Oct. 2005) are satisfied with the use of CAMx for attainment 

demonstrations. Meteorology from 2005, as well as 2005 base year emissions, were used to 

conduct the modeling. The ozone modeling metrics for bias, error, fractional bias, and fractional 

error met U.S. EPA modeling guidance performance criteria. The base-year design value for 

attainment purposes was calculated from the periods 2003 - 2005, 2004 - 2006 and 2005 - 2007. 

Round 5 modeling included several scenarios for attaining the ozone NAAQS. One scenario 

included the implementation of "on-the-books" controls for future years such as U.S. EPA motor 

vehicle and fuel standards with the inclusion of CAIR. Round 6 modeling included the 

implementation of "on-the-books" controls, similar to the Round 5 modeling except without the 

inclusion of CAIR. The future years modeled were 2009, 2012 and 2018. Modeling results, in 

Table 7.3 and 7.4 below, show ozone concentrations in the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN 

nonattainment area below the 8-hour ozone standard in 2009. 
33

Table 7.3 

Application of Round 5 RRFs (with CAIR) to Most Current Base-Year Design Values

 2009 2012 2018 

Monitor ID Site 

2003-2007 

Base DV 

2009 

RRF 

Future 

DV 

2012 

RRF 

Future 

DV 

2018 

RRF 

Future 

DV 

390170004 Butler Co. - OH 0.0833 0.947 0.078 0.922 0.076 0.851 0.070 

390171004 Butler Co. - OH 0.0823 0.95 0.078 0.925 0.076 0.853 0.070 

390250022 Clermont Co. - OH 0.0810 0.962 0.077 0.941 0.076 0.877 0.071 

390271002 Clinton Co. - OH 0.0823 0.941 0.077 0.910 0.074 0.830 0.068 

390610006 Hamilton Co. - OH 0.0847 0.967 0.081 0.948 0.080 0.881 0.074 

390610010 Hamilton Co. - OH 0.0820 0.955 0.078 0.934 0.076 0.878 0.071 

390610040 Hamilton Co. - OH 0.0817 0.975 0.079 0.958 0.078 0.900 0.073 

391650007 Warren Co. - OH 0.0877 0.947 0.083 0.921 0.080 0.846 0.074 

210150003 Boone Co. - KY 0.0753 0.949 0.071 0.919 0.069 0.856 0.064 

210370003 Campbell Co. – KY 0.0853 0.978 0.083 0.962 0.082 0.906 0.077 

211170007 Kenton Co. - KY 0.0783 0.965 0.075 0.949 0.074 0.898 0.070 

Table 7.4 

Application of Round 6 RRFs (without CAIR) to Most Current Base-Year Design Values

 2009 2012 2018 

Monitor ID Site 

2003-2007 

Base DV 

2009 

RRF 

Future 

DV 

2012 

RRF 

Future 

DV 

2018 

RRF 

Future 

DV 

390170004 Butler Co. - OH 0.0833 0.947 0.0789 0.925 0.0771 0.868 0.0723 

390171004 Butler Co. - OH 0.0823 0.948 0.0781 0.927 0.0763 0.868 0.0715 

390250022 Clermont Co. - OH 0.0810 0.955 0.0774 0.939 0.0761 0.893 0.0723 

390271002 Clinton Co. - OH 0.0823 0.94 0.0774 0.913 0.0752 0.849 0.0699 

390610006 Hamilton Co. - OH 0.0847 0.962 0.0814 0.947 0.0802 0.898 0.0760 

390610010 Hamilton Co. - OH 0.0820 0.953 0.0781 0.935 0.0767 0.892 0.0731 

390610040 Hamilton Co. - OH 0.0817 0.964 0.0787 0.952 0.0777 0.912 0.0742 

391650007 Warren Co. - OH 0.0877 0.944 0.0828 0.92 0.0807 0.857 0.0751 

210150003 Boone Co. - KY 0.0753 0.945 0.0712 0.925 0.0697 0.878 0.0661 

210370003 Campbell Co. – KY 0.0853 0.968 0.0829 0.957 0.0817 0.920 0.0785 

211170007 Kenton Co. - KY 0.0783 0.961 0.0753 0.948 0.0743 0.912 0.0714 

7.5 Summary of Existing Modeling Results

U.S. EPA and LADCO modeling shows that existing national emission control measures have 

brought counties in the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area into attainment of 

the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Rulemakings to be implemented in the next several years will 

provide even greater assurance that air quality will continue to meet the standard into the future. 

Modeling support for the NOx SIP Call, Heavy Duty Engine and Highway Diesel Fuel, and Tier 

II/Low Sulfur Fuel and CAIR has shown future year design values for counties in the CincinnatiHamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area will attain the ozone standard with modeled future year 

design values below 0.085 ppm. Review of the design values of the ozone monitors in the 

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area show an overall decline in ozone 

concentrations, as indicated by the trend line for the ozone monitor (390610006) in Hamilton 

County, Ohio with the highest design value for 2006-2008. 
34

Graph 7.1 

Actual Design Values for Cincinnati Nonattainment Area from 1996 through 2008 

0.06

0.065

0.07

0.075

0.08

0.085

0.09

0.095

0.1

0.105

0.11

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

390170004

390171004

390250020

390250022

390271002

390610006

390610010

390610037

390610040

391650002

391650006

391650007

210150003

210371001

210373002

210370003

211170007

Linear (390610006)

On December 23, 2008, CAIR was remanded without vacatur by the D.C. Circuit Court. U.S. 

EPA has modeled base case future years with existing emission controls only and shown that 

counties in the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area will attain the 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS without proposed additional national emission control strategies. The application of the 

most current relative response factors from LADCO’s Round 5 and Round 6 modeling 

demonstrates that the area will continue to attain the standard into the future with or without 

implementation of CAIR. Future national and local emission control strategies will ensure that 

each county’s attainment will be maintained with an increasing margin of safety over time. 

7.6 Temperature Analysis for the Cincinnati, Ohio Area

Meteorological conditions are one of the most important factors that influence ozone 

development and transport. A temperature analysis was conducted to determine how the 

temperatures during the ozone conducive months of April, May, June, July, August, September 

and October compare to normal temperatures for the Cincinnati area for the years 1971 through 

2000. Temperature information was taken from the National Weather Service Station at 

Cincinnati Municipal Airport Lunken Field. Normal maximum temperatures from 1971-2000 

for the Cincinnati area are as follows: 

 May – 74.8o F 

 June – 82.7o

 F 

 July – 86.7o

 F 

 August – 85.1o

 F 

 September – 78.7o

 F 

 May - September – 81.6o

 F 
35

Monthly maximum temperatures for the previous 10 years (1999 – 2008) during the summer 

months are compared to normal summer month temperatures in Table 7.5. Overall, the 

temperatures during the 1999, 2002, 2003, 2005 and 2007 summer months of May, June, July, 

August and September were 1% to 6% above normal while temperatures during the 2000, 2001, 

2004, 2006 and 2008 summer months were at normal to 3% lower than the normal temperatures. 

Table 7.5 shows the average temperatures in the Cincinnati area for each of the past ten years 

and the percent difference from normal for each year. 

Table 7.5 

Analysis of Maximum Temperatures for the Cincinnati, Ohio Area 

(Percent Change from Maximum Temperature (oF) Normals (1971 – 2000)) 

Normal 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 

Max Max % Max % Max % Max % Max % 

May 74.8 75.7 +1 75.6 +1 75.1 0 70.5 -6 70.5 -6 

June 82.7 83.6 +1 81.2 -2 80.1 -3 83.1 0 83.1 0 

July 86.7 89.9 +4 81.9 -6 83.9 -3 89.0 +3 89.0 +3 

August 85.1 83.9 -1 81.4 -4 83.8 -2 88.0 +3 88.0 +3 

September 78.7 81.9 +4 74.9 -5 74.5 -5 82.8 +5 82.8 +5 

AVE 81.6 83 +2 79.0 -3 79.5 -3 82.7 +1 82.7 +1 

 Normal 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 

 Max Max % Max % Max % Max % Max % 

May 74.8 76.5 +2 71.6 -4 71.9 -4 79.9 +7 71.1 -5 

June 82.7 80.4 -3 85.3 +3 80.1 -3 85.6 +4 83.8 +1 

July 86.7 82.3 -5 86.5 0 86.7 0 85.8 -1 84.9 -2 

August 85.1 80.2 -6 87.5 +3 87 +2 93.6 +10 85.4 0 

September 78.7 79 0 81.6 +4 73.1 -7 85.7 +9 82.4 +5 

AVE. 81.6 79.7 -2 82.5 +1 79.8 -2 86.1 +6 81.5 0 

The number of days with temperatures of 90o F and higher were collected from the National 

Weather Service Station at Cincinnati Municipal Airport Lunken Field and compared to the 

average number of days from 1998 through 2008 as well as the number of 8-hour ozone 

exceedance days. Table 7.6 shows this comparison of 8-hour ozone exceedance days and 

number of 90o

 F temperature days while Graph 7.2 shows the correlation graphically. 
36

Table 7.6 

Comparison of Days with 90o

 F and 8-Hour Ozone Exceedance Days 1998- 2008 

 Number of Days with Temperatures of 90o F and higher

Site County Ave. 90o F Days 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 

Cincinnati, OH Hamilton Co. 21.2 15 33 4 9 37 

Number of 8-Hour Exceedance Days at Cincinnati Nonattainment area ozone monitors 

Monitor County 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 

390170004 Butler Co 18 28 9 17 29 

390171004 Butler Co 33 37 10 16 33 

390250020 Clermont Co 30 42 15 N/O N/O 

390250022 Clermont Co N/O N/O N/O 14 28 

390271002 Clinton Co 35 45 17 24 35 

390610006 Hamilton Co 21 22 6 13 33 

390610010 Hamilton Co 22 15 6 8 24 

390610040 Hamilton Co N/O 24 10 13 29 

391650006 Warren Co 33 34 11 14 33 

391650007 Warren Co N/O N/O N/O N/O N/O

210150003 Boone Co 18 22 6 9 21 

210371001 Campbell Co 22 21 N/O N/O N/O

210373002 Campbell Co N/O N/O N/O N/O N/O

210370003 Campbell Co N/O N/O 12 19 38 

211170007 Kenton Co 22 28 9 12 32 

Number of Days with Temperatures of 90o F and higher 

Site County Ave. 90o F Days 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 

Cincinnati, OH Hamilton Co. 21.2 5 4 30 25 39 32 

Number of 8-Hour Exceedance Days at Cincinnati Nonattainment area ozone monitors 

Monitor County 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 

390170004 Butler Co 17 3 22 11 20 1 

390171004 Butler Co 17 5 24 4 27 7 

390250020 Clermont Co N/O N/O N/O N/O N/O N/O 

390250022 Clermont Co 8 4 16 7 17 0 

390271002 Clinton Co 16 6 23 10 21 4 

390610006 Hamilton Co 18 4 22 9 33 12 

390610010 Hamilton Co 12 3 19 10 23 7 

390610040 Hamilton Co 10 4 20 8 15 7 

391650006 Warren Co 2 N/O N/O N/O N/O N/O 

391650007 Warren Co 18 10 24 12 32 11 

210150003 Boone Co 5 1 8 0 6 0 

210371001 Campbell Co N/O N/O N/O N/O N/O N/O 

210373002 Campbell Co N/O N/O N/O N/O 19 2 

210370003 Campbell Co 8 5 23 N/O N/O N/O 

211170007 Kenton Co 8 2 12 3 12 2 

 N/O – Not Operational 
37

Graph 7.2 

Comparison of Days with 90o

 F and 8-Hour Ozone Exceedance Days 

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Year

Number of Days

90o F Days

390170004

390171004

390250020

390250022

390271002

390610006

390610010

390610037

390610040

391650006

391650007

210150003

210371001

210373002

210370003

211170007

As can be seen, a greater number of ozone exceedance days per year correlate with a greater 

number of 90o F days per year. The effects of national control measures appear to have an 

impact on the number of ozone exceedance days per year. This is evident in that 2005 had a 

greater number of days with temperatures of 90o F or more but the number of 8-hour exceedance 

days was lower. While other meteorological factors may have influenced this result to some 

degree, it appears that the lower emissions helped to keep the number of 8-hour ozone 

exceedance days lower during the ozone-conducive conditions of 2005. In 2007, there were 39 

days of 90o F or more and three monitors with the number of 8-hour ozone exceedance days over 

25. In 2002 there were 37 days of 90o

 F or more and nine monitors with the number of 8-hour 

ozone exceedance days over 25. There were similar meteorological conditions in 2002 and 2007 

and less monitors had days over the 8-hour ozone standard in 2007, indicating that emission 

reductions are decreasing ozone concentrations in the area. 

7.7 Summary of Meteorological Conditions

The analysis of the departure from normal of the maximum temperatures during the summer 

months shows variation as illustrated in Table 7.6 and Graph 7.2. The analysis shows that 15 or 

more days with temperatures of 90o

 F and higher occurred in 1998, 1999, 2002, 2005, 2006, 

2007 and 2008. The number of 8-hour ozone exceedance days for those years shows a greater 

correlation to the number of higher temperature days. However, the years with a lesser number 

of 90o F days still yielded 8-hour ozone exceedance days. For example, 2000 and 2001 had 

fewer than the normal amount of 90o F days; however, there were still a significant number of 8-

hour ozone exceedances for those years. In comparison, 2004 was a cooler year, but due to 

national emission reduction measures in effect, there were fewer ozone exceedances. Lower 

ozone values correspond to lowered local and regional ozone precursor emissions despite ozone 
38

conducive conditions. The 8-hour ozone standard, expressed as a 4th high ozone value averaged 

over 3 years, accounts for variations in temperature. Despite such variations, ozone values in the 

Cincinnati nonattainment area have steadily decreased since 1998. 

8.0 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 

8.1 Commitment to Revise Plan

As noted in Section 4.6 above, Indiana commits to review its Maintenance Plan eight (8) years 

after redesignation, as required by Section 175A of the CAA. 

8.2 Commitment for Contingency Measures

Indiana hereby commits to adopt and expeditiously implement necessary corrective actions in the 

following circumstances: 

Warning Level Response: 

A Warning Level Response shall be prompted whenever an annual (1-year) fourth high 

monitored value of 0.089 ppm occurs in a single ozone season, or a two (2)-year average 

fourth high monitored value of 0.085 ppm or greater occurs within the maintenance area. 

A Warning Level Response will consist of a study to determine whether the ozone value 

indicates a trend toward higher ozone values or whether emissions appear to be 

increasing. The study will evaluate whether the trend, if any, is likely to continue and, if 

so, the control measures necessary to reverse the trend taking into consideration ease and 

timing for implementation, as well as economic and social considerations. 

Implementation of necessary controls in response to a Warning Level Response trigger 

will take place as expeditiously as possible, but in no event later than twelve (12) months 

from the conclusion of the most recent ozone season (September 30). Should it be 

determined through the Warning Level study that action is necessary to reverse the noted 

trend, the procedures for control selection and implementation outlined under “Action 

Level Response” shall be followed. 

Action Level Response

An Action Level Response shall be prompted whenever a violation of the standard (three 

(3)-year average fourth high monitored value of 0.085 ppm or greater) occurs within the 

maintenance area. In the event that the Action Level is triggered and is not found to be 

due to an exceptional event, malfunction, or noncompliance with a permit condition or 

rule requirement, IDEM will determine additional control measures needed to assure 

future attainment of the NAAQS for ozone. In this case, measures that can be 

implemented in a short time will be selected and be in place within eighteen (18) months 

from the close of the ozone season that prompted the Action Level. 
39

Control Measure Selection and Implementation

Adoption of any additional control measures is subject to the necessary administrative 

and legal process. This process will include publication of notices, an opportunity for 

public hearing and other measures required by Indiana law for rulemaking by state 

environmental boards. 

If a new measure/control is already promulgated and scheduled to be implemented at the 

federal or state level, and that measure/control is determined to be sufficient to address 

the upward trend in air quality, additional local measures may be unnecessary. 

Furthermore, Indiana will submit to U.S. EPA an analysis to demonstrate the proposed 

measures are adequate to return the area to attainment. 

8.3 Contingency Measures

Contingency measures to be considered will be selected from a comprehensive list of measures 

deemed appropriate and effective at the time the selection is made. Listed below are example 

measures that may be considered. The selection of measures will be based upon costeffectiveness, emission reduction potential, economic and social considerations, or other factors 

that IDEM and U.S. EPA deem appropriate. IDEM will solicit input from interested and affected 

persons in the maintenance area prior to selecting appropriate contingency measures. All of the 

listed contingency measures are potentially effective or proven methods of obtaining significant 

reductions of ozone precursor emissions. Because it is not possible at this time to determine 

what control measure will be appropriate at an unspecified time in the future, the list of 

contingency measures outlined below is not comprehensive. Indiana anticipates that if 

contingency measures should ever be necessary, it is unlikely that a significant number (i.e., all 

those listed below) will be required. 

1. Installation of a vehicle emissions testing program 

2. Asphalt paving (lower VOC formulation) 

3. Diesel exhaust retrofits 

4. Traffic flow improvements 

5. Idle reduction programs 

6. Portable fuel container regulation (statewide) 

7. Park and ride facilities 

8. Rideshare/carpool program 

9. VOC cap/trade program for major stationary sources 

10. Commercial/consumer solvents (statewide) 

11. NOx Reasonably Available Control Technology 

No contingency measure shall be implemented without providing the opportunity for full public 

participation during which the relative costs and benefits of individual measures, at the time they 

are under consideration, can be fully evaluated. 
40

9.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 

This section will be completed upon conclusion of the public participation process. 

10.0 CONCLUSIONS 

Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County, Indiana, along with the remaining portion of the 

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN nonattainment area, has attained the NAAQS standard for 

ozone. This petition demonstrates that Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County has 

complied with the applicable provisions of the CAA regarding redesignation of ozone 

nonattainment areas. IDEM has prepared a Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan that 

meets the requirement of Section 110(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act. 

Indiana has performed an analysis that shows the air quality improvements are due to permanent 

and enforceable measures and that significant regional NOx reductions will ensure continued 

compliance (maintenance) with the standard. Additionally, Indiana has ensured that all CAA 

requirements necessary to support redesignation have been met. 

In addition to the corrective actions (should they be necessary) outlined in this submittal, Indiana 

continues to participate in the regional air quality planning efforts sponsored by LADCO. The 

current goal of the planning process is to establish a regional control strategy that provides for 

attainment of the ozone and fine particle standards throughout the states of Illinois, Indiana, 

Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin. Along with the other LADCO states, Indiana is developing 

local and statewide emission control measures, where photochemical modeling and culpability 

analyses demonstrate a clear need and cost effectiveness analyses justify the implementation of 

such measures. These actions will provide for an even greater margin of safety for the 

Cincinnati, Ohio area and ensure continued maintenance well into the future. 

Based on this presentation, Indiana’s portion of the nonattainment area (Lawrenceburg Township 

in Dearborn County) meets the requirements for redesignation under Section 107(d)(3) of the 

CAA and U.S. EPA guidance. Furthermore, because this area is subject to transport, additional 

regional NOx and VOC reductions will ensure continued compliance (maintenance) with the 

standards and provide an increased margin of safety. 

Consistent with the authority granted to the U.S. EPA under Section 107(d)(3) of the CAA, 

Indiana requests that Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County be redesignated to attainment 

simultaneously with U.S. EPA approval of the Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan 

provisions contained herein.
APPENDIX A 

Air Quality System (AQS) Monitor Data Values 

for Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN 

Nonattainment Area (2004-2009) 
This page left intentionally blank.
A - 1 

DRAFT 

AQS Monitoring Data for Kentucky’s portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton 

OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

KENTUCKY 

8-HOUR Ozone (44201) 

(PARTS PER MILLION) 

 VALID NUM 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH DAY 

 DAYS DAYS MAX MAX MAX MAX 

MAX 

> 

SITE 

ID POC PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH %OBS MEAS REQ 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR 0.075 CERT 

21-015-0003 1 584 Not in a city Boone 

KY 338 & LOWER 

RIVER ROAD 2004 53 100 245 245 0.077 0.071 0.07 0.07 1 Y 

21-015-0003 1 584 Not in a city Boone 

KY 338 & LOWER 

RIVER ROAD 2005 0 95 233 245 0.082 0.082 0.082 0.082 8 Y 

21-015-0003 1 584 Not in a city Boone 

KY 338 & LOWER 

RIVER ROAD 2006 87 100 244 245 0.072 0.072 0.072 0.071 0 

21-015-0003 1 584 Not in a city Boone 

KY 338 & LOWER 

RIVER ROAD 2007 87 100 245 245 0.081 0.079 0.078 0.078 6 

21-015-0003 1 584 Not in a city Boone 

KY 338 & LOWER 

RIVER ROAD 2008 87 98 241 245 0.065 0.064 0.064 0.064 0 Y 

21-015-0003 1 584 Not in a city Boone 

KY 338 & LOWER 

RIVER ROAD 2009 87 23 57 245 0.063 0.059 0.059 0.059 0 

21-037-3002 1 584 

Highland 

Heights Campbell 

524A John Hill 

Road 2007 87 100 123 123 0.095 0.092 0.088 0.086 19 

21-037-3002 1 584 

Highland 

Heights Campbell 

524A John Hill 

Road 2008 87 99 242 245 0.084 0.083 0.075 0.075 2 Y 

21-037-3002 1 584 

Highland 

Heights Campbell 

524A John Hill 

Road 2009 87 25 61 245 0.062 0.058 0.056 0.055 0 

21-117-0007 1 584 Covington Kenton 

1401 DIXIE HWY, 

UNIVERSITY 

COLLEGE 2004 53 95 232 245 0.081 0.076 0.075 0.073 2 

21-117-0007 1 584 Covington Kenton 

1401 DIXIE HWY, 

UNIVERSITY 

COLLEGE 2005 0 99 242 245 0.091 0.088 0.087 0.084 12 Y 

21-117-0007 1 584 Covington Kenton 

1401 DIXIE HWY, 

UNIVERSITY 

COLLEGE 2006 87 97 238 245 0.082 0.081 0.079 0.075 3 

21-117-0007 1 584 Covington Kenton 

1401 DIXIE HWY, 

UNIVERSITY 

COLLEGE 2007 87 100 244 245 0.093 0.089 0.085 0.085 12 

21-117-0007 1 584 Covington Kenton 

1401 DIXIE HWY, 

UNIVERSITY 

COLLEGE 2008 87 99 242 245 0.08 0.077 0.074 0.073 2 Y 

21-117-0007 1 584 Covington Kenton 

1401 DIXIE HWY, 

UNIVERSITY 

COLLEGE 2009 87 25 61 245 0.068 0.06 0.056 0.055 0 
A - 2 

DRAFT 

AQS Monitoring Data for Ohio’s portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton OHKY-IN Nonattainment Area 

OHIO 

8-HOUR Ozone 

(44201) (PARTS PER MILLION) VALID NUM 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH DAY 

 DAYS DAYS MAX MAX MAX MAX 

MAX 

> 

SITE ID POC PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH %OBS MEAS REQ 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR 0.075 CERT 

39-017-0004 1 1259 Hamilton Butler SCHULER AND BENDER 2004 87 100 214 214 0.09 0.081 0.078 0.075 3 Y 

39-017-0004 1 1259 Hamilton Butler SCHULER AND BENDER 2005 87 100 213 214 0.098 0.098 0.088 0.086 22 Y 

39-017-0004 1 1259 Hamilton Butler SCHULER AND BENDER 2006 87 99 212 214 0.087 0.082 0.082 0.079 11 Y 

39-017-0004 1 1259 Hamilton Butler SCHULER AND BENDER 2007 87 100 214 214 0.097 0.096 0.091 0.091 20 

39-017-0004 1 1259 Hamilton Butler SCHULER AND BENDER 2008 87 99 211 214 0.089 0.075 0.072 0.071 1 Y 

39-017-0004 1 1259 Hamilton Butler SCHULER AND BENDER 2009 87 41 88 214 0.079 0.078 0.074 0.073 2 

39-017-1004 3 1259 Middletown Butler HOOK FIELD AIRPORT 2004 56 100 213 214 0.087 0.079 0.078 0.076 5 Y 

39-017-1004 3 1259 Middletown Butler HOOK FIELD AIRPORT 2005 56 100 213 214 0.106 0.091 0.089 0.088 24 Y 

39-017-1004 3 1259 Middletown Butler HOOK FIELD AIRPORT 2006 87 100 213 214 0.085 0.084 0.077 0.076 4 Y 

39-017-1004 3 1259 Middletown Butler HOOK FIELD AIRPORT 2007 87 100 214 214 0.104 0.097 0.095 0.091 27 

39-017-1004 3 1259 Middletown Butler HOOK FIELD AIRPORT 2008 0 96 205 214 0.091 0.087 0.082 0.079 7 Y 

39-017-1004 3 1259 Middletown Butler HOOK FIELD AIRPORT 2009 87 43 91 214 0.078 0.076 0.076 0.076 4 

39-025-0022 1 1259 Batavia Clermont 2400 CLERMONT CNTR. 2004 0 99 212 214 0.082 0.077 0.076 0.076 4 Y 

39-025-0022 1 1259 Batavia Clermont 2400 CLERMONT CNTR 2005 87 99 211 214 0.089 0.087 0.083 0.083 16 Y 

39-025-0022 1 1259 Batavia Clermont 2400 CLERMONT CNTR. 2006 87 99 212 214 0.087 0.081 0.077 0.077 7 Y 

39-025-0022 1 1259 Batavia Clermont 2400 CLERMONT CNTR. 2007 0 98 209 214 0.093 0.092 0.09 0.086 17 

39-025-0022 1 1259 Batavia Clermont 2400 CLERMONT CNTR. 2008 87 97 207 214 0.072 0.071 0.071 0.071 0 Y 

39-025-0022 1 1259 Batavia Clermont 2400 CLERMONT CNTR 2009 87 42 90 214 0.071 0.071 0.069 0.069 0 

39-027-1002 1 810 Wilmington Clinton 62 LAUREL DR. 2004 47 100 214 214 0.087 0.081 0.081 0.078 6 Y 

39-027-1002 1 810 Wilmington Clinton 62 LAUREL DR. 2005 47 100 213 214 0.097 0.095 0.093 0.083 23 Y 

39-027-1002 1 810 Wilmington Clinton 62 LAUREL DR. 2006 47 100 214 214 0.09 0.085 0.084 0.081 10 Y 

39-027-1002 1 810 Wilmington Clinton 62 LAUREL DR. 2007 47 99 212 214 0.091 0.089 0.085 0.082 21 

39-027-1002 1 810 Wilmington Clinton 62 LAUREL DR. 2008 47 96 206 214 0.087 0.08 0.077 0.076 4 Y 

39-027-1002 1 810 Wilmington Clinton 62 LAUREL DR. 2009 47 40 86 214 0.073 0.072 0.071 0.07 0 

39-061-0006 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 11590 GROOMS RD 2004 0 98 210 214 0.084 0.078 0.076 0.076 4 Y 

39-061-0006 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 11590 GROOMS RD 2005 87 100 214 214 0.101 0.095 0.095 0.089 22 Y 

39-061-0006 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 11590 GROOMS RD 2006 87 100 213 214 0.084 0.084 0.082 0.081 9 Y 

39-061-0006 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 11590 GROOMS RD 2007 87 96 206 214 0.1 0.092 0.091 0.089 33 

39-061-0006 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 11590 GROOMS RD 2008 87 97 208 214 0.093 0.089 0.087 0.086 12 Y 

39-061-0006 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 11590 GROOMS RD 2009 87 43 91 214 0.08 0.076 0.075 0.072 2 

39-061-0010 1 1259 Cleves Hamilton 6950 RIPPLE RD. 2004 19 100 214 214 0.085 0.084 0.077 0.075 3 Y 

39-061-0010 1 1259 Cleves Hamilton 6950 RIPPLE RD. 2005 19 100 214 214 0.113 0.093 0.087 0.085 19 Y 

39-061-0010 1 1259 Cleves Hamilton 6950 RIPPLE RD. 2006 0 100 213 214 0.098 0.092 0.082 0.081 10 Y 

39-061-0010 1 1259 Cleves Hamilton 6950 RIPPLE RD. 2007 87 99 212 214 0.093 0.091 0.088 0.086 23 

39-061-0010 1 1259 Cleves Hamilton 6950 RIPPLE RD. 2008 87 96 205 214 0.085 0.079 0.078 0.077 7 Y 

39-061-0010 1 1259 Cleves Hamilton 6950 RIPPLE RD. 2009 87 25 53 214 0.065 0.065 0.064 0.059 0 

39-061-0040 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 250 WM. HOWARD TAFT 2004 56 100 213 214 0.078 0.078 0.077 0.076 4 Y 

39-061-0040 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 250 WM. HOWARD TAFT 2005 0 98 209 214 0.095 0.091 0.09 0.087 20 Y 

39-061-0040 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 250 WM. HOWARD TAFT 2006 87 99 212 214 0.089 0.08 0.079 0.078 8 Y 

39-061-0040 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 250 WM. HOWARD TAFT 2007 0 99 212 214 0.097 0.093 0.088 0.086 15 

39-061-0040 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 250 WM. HOWARD TAFT 2008 87 100 213 214 0.086 0.083 0.081 0.08 7 Y 

39-061-0040 1 1259 Cincinnati Hamilton 250 WM. HOWARD TAFT 2009 87 43 91 214 0.077 0.076 0.074 0.074 2 

39-165-0007 1 1259 Lebanon Warren 416 SOUTHEAST ST. 2004 56 100 213 214 0.087 0.085 0.083 0.081 10 Y 

39-165-0007 1 1259 Lebanon Warren 416 SOUTHEAST ST. 2005 0 98 210 214 0.101 0.101 0.096 0.092 24 Y 

39-165-0007 1 1259 Lebanon Warren 416 SOUTHEAST ST. 2006 87 100 214 214 0.092 0.09 0.088 0.086 12 Y 

39-165-0007 1 1259 Lebanon Warren 416 SOUTHEAST ST. 2007 87 100 214 214 0.103 0.089 0.088 0.088 32 

39-165-0007 1 1259 Lebanon Warren 416 SOUTHEAST ST. 2008 0 95 204 214 0.092 0.087 0.084 0.082 11 Y 

39-165-0007 1 1259 Lebanon Warren 416 SOUTHEAST ST. 2009 87 43 91 214 0.08 0.08 0.078 0.077 4 
A - 3 

DRAFT 

AQS Monitoring Data for Entire Nonattainment Area 

State County Site ID Site Name 

Three Year Design Values (ppm) 

04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09 

Kentucky Boone 21-015-0003 KY 338 0.074 0.077 0.071 0.067 

Kentucky Campbell 31-037-3002 Highland Heights 0.072 

Kentucky Kenton 21-117-0007 Covington 0.077 0.081 0.078 0.071 

Ohio Butler 39-017-0004 Hamilton 0.080 0.085 0.080 0.078 

Ohio Butler 39-017-1004 Middletown 0.080 0.085 0.082 0.082 

Ohio Clermont 39-025-0022 Batavia 0.079 0.082 0.078 0.075 

Ohio Clinton 39-027-1002 Wilmington 0.081 0.082 0.080 0.076 

Ohio Hamilton 39-061-0006 Cincinnati-Grooms Rd 0.082 0.086 0.085 0.082 

Ohio Hamilton 39-061-0010 Cleves 0.080 0.084 0.081 0.074 

Ohio Hamilton 39-061-0040 Cincinnati-Wm. Howard Taft 0.080 0.084 0.081 0.080 

Ohio Warren 39-165-0007 Lebanon 0.086 0.089 0.085 0.082 

Value greater than or equal to 0.085 ppm

State County Site ID Site Name 

4th High Values (ppm) 

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 

Kentucky Boone 21-015-0003 KY 338 0.070 0.082 0.071 0.078 0.064 0.059 

Kentucky Campbell 21-037-3002 Highland Heights 0.086 0.075 0.055 

Kentucky Kenton 21-117-0007 Covington 0.073 0.084 0.075 0.085 0.073 0.055 

Ohio Butler 39-017-0004 Hamilton 0.075 0.086 0.079 0.091 0.071 0.073 

Ohio Butler 39-017-1004 Middletown 0.076 0.088 0.076 0.091 0.079 0.076 

Ohio Clermont 39-025-0022 Batavia 0.076 0.083 0.077 0.086 0.071 0.069 

Ohio Clinton 39-027-1002 Wilmington 0.078 0.083 0.081 0.082 0.076 0.070 

Ohio Hamilton 39-061-0006 Cincinnati-Grooms Rd 0.076 0.089 0.081 0.089 0.086 0.072 

Ohio Hamilton 39-061-0010 Cleves 0.075 0.085 0.081 0.086 0.077 0.059 

Ohio Hamilton 39-061-0040 Cincinnati-Wm. Howard Taft 0.076 0.087 0.078 0.086 0.080 0.074 

Ohio Warren 39-165-0007 Lebanon 0.081 0.092 0.086 0.088 0.082 0.077 

Value greater than or equal to 0.085 ppm 
A - 4 

DRAFT 

2007-2009 Design Values for the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN 

Nonattainment Area 

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

0.080

0.090

KY 338, KY Highland

Heights, KY

Covington,

KY

Hamilton, OH Middletow n,

OH

Batavia, OH Wilmington,

OH

Cincinnati,

OH-Grooms

Rd.

Cleves, OH Cincinnati,

OH-WM.

How ard Taft

Rd.

Lebanon, OH

21-015-0003 21-037-3002 21-117-0007 39-017-0004 39-017-1004 39-025-0022 39-027-1002 39-061-0006 39-061-0010 39-061-0040 39-165-0007

Parts per Million

2007-2009 8-Hour Ozone Standard

DRAFT 

Design Value Trends in the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area, 

2004-2009 

0.060

0.065

0.070

0.075

0.080

0.085

0.090

0.095

04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09

Parts per Million

21-015-0003 KY 338, KY

21-037-3002 Highland Heights, KY

21-117-0007 Covington, KY

39-017-0004 Hamilton, OH

39-017-1004 Middletow n, OH

39-025-0022 Batavia, OH

39-027-1002 Wilmington, OH

39-061-0006 Cincinnati, OH-Grooms Rd.

39-061-0010 Cleves, OH

39-061-0040 Cincinnati, OH-WM. How ard Taft

Rd.

39-165-0007 Lebanon, OH

8-Hour Ozone Standard
APPENDIX B 

Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Volatile Organic 

Compounds (VOC) Point Source Emissions, 2005 

and 2008, for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn 

County Indiana and Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, 

OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 
This page left intentionally blank.
B-1 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 

Point Source Emission Totals 

(Tons per Day) 

Year NOx VOC 

2005 30.40 3.24 

2008 30.55 3.58 

2005 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 

Point Source Emission Totals (EGU vs Non EGU) 

(Tons per Day)

EGU-NOx NON EGU-NOx EGU-VOC NON-EGU-VOC 

Lawrenceburg Township, 

Dearborn County, Indiana 25.31 5.09 0.33 2.91 

Total NOx 30.40 Total VOC 3.24 

2005 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 

Point Source Inventory 

(Tons per Day) 

Facility Name NOX VOC 

Aurora Casket Company Inc. 0.01 1.25 

American Electric Power-Tanners Creek 25.31 0.32 

Pernod Ricard USA 1.34 1.33 

Anchor Glass Container Corporation 1.29 0.05 

Texas Gas Transmission-Dillsboro 1.81 0.07 

Aurora Casket Company-Vanguard Plant 0.00 0.20 

Trans Agg, Inc. DBA Gibbco, Inc. 0.00 0.01 

PSEG Lawrenceburg Energy Company, Inc. 0.64 0.01 

Total 30.40 3.24 
B-2

2008 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 

Point Source Emission Totals (EGU vs Non EGU) 

(Tons per Day)

EGU-NOx NON EGU-NOx EGU-VOC NON-EGU-VOC 

Lawrenceburg Township, 

Dearborn County, Indiana 27.34 3.21 0.35 3.23 

Total NOx 30.55 Total VOC 3.58 

2008 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 

Point Source Inventory 

(Tons per Day) 

Facility Name NOX VOC 

Aurora Casket Company Inc. 0.01 1.23 

American Electric Power-Tanners Creek 27.34 0.35 

Pernod Ricard USA 1.16 1.92 

Anchor Glass Container Corporation 0.85 0.02 

Texas Gas Transmission-Dillsboro 0.86 0.03 

Aurora Casket Company-Vanguard Plant 0.02 0.03 

Trans Agg, Inc. DBA Gibbco, Inc. 0.00 0.00 

PSEG Lawrenceburg Energy Company, Inc. 0.31 0.00 

Total 30.55 3.58 
B-3

NOx Point Source Emissions, Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, 

Indiana, 2005-2008 

30.00

30.20

30.40

30.60

30.80

31.00

2005 2008

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

NOx

VOC Point Source Emissions, Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana, 

2005-2008 

-

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

2005 2008 Year

Tons Per Summer Day

VOC
B-4

This page left intentionally blank
B-5

Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

Point Source Emission Totals 

(Tons per Day) 

Year NOx VOC 

2005 138.03 15.13 

2008 147.14 14.79 

2005 

Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

Point Source Emission Totals (EGU vs Non EGU) 

(Tons per Day)

EGU-NOx NON EGU-NOx EGU-VOC NON-EGU-VOC 

Lawrenceburg Township, 

Dearborn County, Indiana 25.31 5.09 0.33 2.91 

Boone County, Kentucky 23.80 0.14 0.17 2.40 

Campbell County, Kentucky 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 

Kenton County, Kentucky 0.00 0.04 0.00 1.20 

Butler County, Ohio 3.88 12.03 0.03 3.64 

Clermont County, Ohio 42.96 0.15 0.49 0.24 

Clinton County, Ohio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Hamilton County, Ohio 15.23 6.72 0.28 2.66 

Warren County, Ohio 0.00 2.68 0.00 0.53 

Total NOx 138.03 Total VOC 15.13 

2008 

Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

Point Source Emission Totals (EGU vs Non EGU) 

(Tons per Day)

EGU-NOx NON EGU-NOx EGU-VOC NON-EGU-VOC 

Lawrenceburg Township, 

Dearborn County, Indiana 27.34 3.21 0.35 3.23 

Boone County, Kentucky 23.15 0.12 0.17 2.64 

Campbell County, Kentucky 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.28 

Kenton County, Kentucky 0.00 0.03 0.00 1.17 

Butler County, Ohio 1.34 10.53 0.02 2.77 

Clermont County, Ohio 44.65 0.18 0.20 0.09 

Clinton County, Ohio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Hamilton County, Ohio 27.26 6.17 0.20 2.85 

Warren County, Ohio 0.00 3.14 0.00 0.82 

Total NOx 147.14 Total VOC 14.79 
B-6

 NOx Point Source Emissions, Entire Nonattainment Area, 2005-2008 

30.00

50.00

70.00

90.00

110.00

130.00

150.00

170.00

190.00

2005 2008

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

NOx

 VOC Point Source Emissions, Entire Nonattainment Area, 2005-2008 

-

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

16.00

2005 2008

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

VOC
APPENDIX C 

Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Volatile Organic 

Compounds (VOC) All Emission Sources, 2005 

and 2008, for Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn 

County, Indiana and Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, 

OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 
This page left intentionally blank. 
C-1 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 

All Anthropogenic Source Emission Totals 

(Tons per Day) 

Year NOx VOC 

2005 33.36 7.13 

2008 33.09 7.49 

NOx Emissions Trends, 2005-2008, All Anthropogenic Sources in Lawrenceburg 

Township, Dearborn County 

31.00

32.00

33.00

34.00

35.00

2005 2008

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

NOx

 

2005 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 

All Anthropogenic Sources 

(Tons per Day) 

 AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL 

NOX 0.26 1.26 1.44 30.40 33.36

VOC 2.07 0.82 1.00 3.24 7.13

 

2008 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 

All Anthropogenic Sources 

(Tons per Day) 

 AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL 

NOX 0.26 1.14 1.14 30.55 33.09

VOC 2.42 0.74 0.75 3.58 7.49
C-2 

VOC Emissions Trends, 2005-2008, All Anthropogenic Sources in Lawrenceburg 

Township, Dearborn County 

6.90

7.00

7.10

7.20

7.30

7.40

7.50

7.60

2005 2008

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

VOC
C-3 

Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

All Anthropogenic Source Emission Totals 

(Tons per Day) 

Year NOx VOC 

2005 

2008 

NOx Emissions Trends, 2005-2008, All Anthropogenic Sources-Entire 

Nonattainment Area 

200.00

250.00

300.00

350.00

400.00

2005 2008 Year

Tons Per Summer Day

NOx

 

2005 

Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

All Anthropogenic Sources 

(Tons per Day) 

 AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL 

NOX 

VOC 

 

2008 

Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

All Anthropogenic Sources 

(Tons per Day) 

 AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL 

NOX 

VOC 
C-4 

VOC Emissions Trends, 2005-2008, All Anthropogenic Sources-Entire 

Nonattainment Area 

170.00

175.00

180.00

185.00

190.00

195.00

200.00

205.00

210.00

215.00

220.00

2005 2008

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

VOC
C-5 

2005 

Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

All Anthropogenic Sources 

(Tons per Day) 

State County Sector NOX VOC 

Indiana Dearborn County AREA 0.26 2.07

Indiana Dearborn County NONROAD 1.26 0.82

Indiana Dearborn County ONROAD 1.44 1.00

Indiana Dearborn County EGU 25.31 0.33

Indiana Dearborn County POINT 5.09 2.91

Kentucky Boone County AREA 4.99 8.13

Kentucky Boone County NONROAD 12.96 1.71

Kentucky Boone County ONROAD 10.27 4.33

Kentucky Boone County EGU 23.80 0.17

Kentucky Boone County POINT 0.14 2.40

Kentucky Campbell County AREA 1.41 4.77

Kentucky Campbell County NONROAD 6.33 1.76

Kentucky Campbell County ONROAD 5.98 2.52

Kentucky Campbell County EGU 0.00 0.00

Kentucky Campbell County POINT 0.00 0.25

Kentucky Kenton County AREA 4.17 8.53

Kentucky Kenton County NONROAD 8.43 2.33

Kentucky Kenton County ONROAD 10.39 4.32

Kentucky Kenton County EGU 0.00 0.00

Kentucky Kenton County POINT 0.04 1.20

Ohio Butler County AREA 2.15 11.96

Ohio Butler County NONROAD 10.25 6.88

Ohio Butler County ONROAD 18.80 9.94

Ohio Butler County EGU 3.88 0.03

Ohio Butler County POINT 12.03 3.64

Ohio Clermont County AREA 1.65 6.98

Ohio Clermont County NONROAD 5.03 4.33

Ohio Clermont County ONROAD 13.04 6.86

Ohio Clermont County EGU 42.96 0.49

Ohio Clermont County POINT 0.15 0.24

Ohio Clinton County AREA 0.42 3.24

Ohio Clinton County NONROAD 2.26 1.77

Ohio Clinton County ONROAD 5.07 3.02

Ohio Clinton County EGU 0.00 0.00

Ohio Clinton County POINT 0.00 0.00

Ohio Hamilton County AREA 5.19 33.04

Ohio Hamilton County NONROAD 20.57 17.45

Ohio Hamilton County ONROAD 56.51 29.47

Ohio Hamilton County EGU 15.23 0.28

Ohio Hamilton County POINT 6.72 2.66

Ohio Warren County AREA 1.15 8.40

Ohio Warren County NONROAD 6.10 4.79

Ohio Warren County ONROAD 15.15 7.97

Ohio Warren County EGU 0.00 0.00

Ohio Warren County POINT 2.68 0.53
C-6 

2008 

Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

All Anthropogenic Sources 

(Tons per Day) 

State County Sector NOX VOC 

Indiana Dearborn County AREA 0.26 2.42

Indiana Dearborn County NONROAD 1.14 0.74

Indiana Dearborn County ONROAD 1.14 0.75

Indiana Dearborn County EGU 27.34 0.35

Indiana Dearborn County POINT 3.21 3.23

Kentucky Boone County AREA 5.02 8.41

Kentucky Boone County NONROAD 11.02 5.07

Kentucky Boone County ONROAD 8.53 4.00

Kentucky Boone County EGU 23.15 0.17

Kentucky Boone County POINT 0.12 2.64

Kentucky Campbell County AREA 1.32 4.34

Kentucky Campbell County NONROAD 5.34 1.51

Kentucky Campbell County ONROAD 4.88 2.29

Kentucky Campbell County EGU 0.00 0.00

Kentucky Campbell County POINT 0.02 0.28

Kentucky Kenton County AREA 4.06 7.88

Kentucky Kenton County NONROAD 7.33 1.95

Kentucky Kenton County ONROAD 8.37 3.85

Kentucky Kenton County EGU 0.00 0.00

Kentucky Kenton County POINT 0.03 1.17

Ohio Butler County AREA 2.18 10.31

Ohio Butler County NONROAD 8.89 5.68

Ohio Butler County ONROAD 16.05 7.87

Ohio Butler County EGU 1.34 0.02

Ohio Butler County POINT 10.53 2.77

Ohio Clermont County AREA 1.67 6.05

Ohio Clermont County NONROAD 4.22 3.68

Ohio Clermont County ONROAD 11.05 5.42

Ohio Clermont County EGU 44.65 0.20

Ohio Clermont County POINT 0.18 0.09

Ohio Clinton County AREA 0.43 2.85

Ohio Clinton County NONROAD 2.01 1.65

Ohio Clinton County ONROAD 3.87 2.33

Ohio Clinton County EGU 0.00 0.00

Ohio Clinton County POINT 0.00 0.00

Ohio Hamilton County AREA 5.27 28.80

Ohio Hamilton County NONROAD 17.21 14.66

Ohio Hamilton County ONROAD 46.80 22.70

Ohio Hamilton County EGU 27.26 0.20

Ohio Hamilton County POINT 6.17 2.85

Ohio Warren County AREA 1.17 7.30

Ohio Warren County NONROAD 5.19 4.10

Ohio Warren County ONROAD 12.76 6.26

Ohio Warren County EGU 0.00 0.00

Ohio Warren County POINT 3.14 0.82
APPENDIX D 

Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Emissions from Electric 

Generating Units, Lawrenceburg Township, 

Dearborn County, Indiana and Entire CincinnatiHamilton OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 
This page left intentionally blank.
D-1

 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, 

Indiana NOx Emissions from EGUs 

Year Total NOx Emissions, tons / year 

1999 33,807.1 

2000 32,657.1 

2001 25,774.7 

2002 17,533.8 

2003 13,416.7 

2004 12,552.8 

2005 7,961.3 

2006 8,041.6 

2007 8,739.2 

2008 7,429.2 

NOx Emissions from Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana Electric 

Generating Unit American Electric Power-Tanners Creek Generating Station, 1999-

2008 

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

1999200020012002200320042005200620072008

Year

Tons per Year

NOx
D-2

 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana NOx Emissions 

Facility Year NOx Emissions, tons / year 

American Electric Power (AEP)- 

Tanners Creek Generating Station 1999 33,807.1 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 2000 32,657.1 

American Electric Power (AEP) -

Tanners Creek Generating Station 2001 25,774.7 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 2002 17,533.8 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 2003 13,416.7 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 2004 12,552.8 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 2005 7,961.3 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 2006 8,041.6 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 2007 8,739.2 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 2008 7,429.2 
D-3

NOx Emissions from EGUs-Entire Cincinnnati-Hamilton OHKY-IN Nonattainment Area 

Year Total NOx Emissions, tons / year 

1999 115,477.8 

2000 107,227.9 

2001 90,347.2 

2002 80,808.6 

2003 73,084.4 

2004 65,491.6 

2005 55,492.4 

2006 52,004.5 

2007 50,979.6 

2008 48,464.0 

NOx Emissions from Entire Nonattainment Area Electric Generating 

Units, 1999-2008 

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

1999200020012002200320042005200620072008

Year

Tons per Year

NOx
D-4

 

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment 

Area NOxEmissions from EGUs 

1999 

State Facility NOx Emissions, tons / year 

Indiana 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 33,807.1 

Kentucky East Bend 10,113.8 

Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 26,429.1 

Ohio 

William H Zimmer Generating 

Station 22,792.3 

Ohio 

Walter C Beckjord Generating 

Station 22,091.4 

Ohio Woodsdale 244.1 

Total 115,477.8 

 

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment 

Area NOxEmissions from EGUs 

2000 

State Facility NOx Emissions, tons / year 

Indiana 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 32,657.1 

Kentucky East Bend 8,671.0 

Ohio Madison Generating Station 15.1 

Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 25,518.8 

Ohio 

William H Zimmer Generating 

Station 18,682.3 

Ohio 

Walter C Beckjord Generating 

Station 21,408.7 

Ohio Woodsdale 274.9 

Total 107,227.9 

 

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment 

Area NOxEmissions from EGUs 

2001 

State Facility NOx Emissions, tons / year 

Indiana 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 25,774.7 

Kentucky East Bend 8,161.5 

Ohio Madison Generating Station 32.0 

Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 18,598.8 

Ohio 

William H Zimmer Generating 

Station 20,886.3 

Ohio 

Walter C Beckjord Generating 

Station 16,743.0 

Ohio Woodsdale 150.9 

Total 90,347.2 
D-5

 

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment 

Area NOxEmissions from EGUs 

2002 

State Facility NOx Emissions, tons / year 

Indiana 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 17,533.8 

Kentucky East Bend 5,454.9 

Ohio Madison Generating Station 48.7 

Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 17,941.5 

Ohio 

William H Zimmer Generating 

Station 20,965.6 

Ohio 

Walter C Beckjord Generating 

Station 18,736.8 

Ohio Woodsdale 127.3 

Total 80,808.6 

 

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment 

Area NOxEmissions from EGUs 

2003 

State Facility NOx Emissions, tons / year 

Indiana 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 13,416.7 

Kentucky East Bend 7,056.0 

Ohio Madison Generating Station 51.7 

Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 15,593.7 

Ohio 

William H Zimmer Generating 

Station 20,174.0 

Ohio 

Walter C Beckjord Generating 

Station 16,727.9 

Ohio Woodsdale 64.4 

Total 73,084.4 

 

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment 

Area NOxEmissions from EGUs 

2004 

State Facility NOx Emissions, tons / year 

Indiana 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 12,552.8 

Kentucky East Bend 6,187.2 

Ohio Madison Generating Station 14.0 

Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 17,102.2 

Ohio 

William H Zimmer Generating 

Station 14,692.7 

Ohio 

Walter C Beckjord Generating 

Station 14.914.2 

Ohio Woodsdale 28.5 

Total 65,491.6 
D-6

 

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment 

Area NOxEmissions from EGUs 

2005 

State Facility NOx Emissions, tons / year 

Indiana 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 7,961.3 

Kentucky East Bend 3,952.2 

Ohio Madison Generating Station 91.5 

Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 15,264.6 

Ohio 

William H Zimmer Generating 

Station 15,153.0 

Ohio 

Walter C Beckjord Generating 

Station 13,012.8 

Ohio Woodsdale 57.0 

Total 55,492.4 

 

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment 

Area NOxEmissions from EGUs 

2006 

State Facility NOx Emissions, tons / year 

Indiana 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 8,041.6 

Kentucky East Bend 5,399.7 

Ohio Madison Generating Station 38.4 

Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 12,797.9 

Ohio 

William H Zimmer Generating 

Station 13,851.3 

Ohio 

Walter C Beckjord Generating 

Station 11,830.2 

Ohio Woodsdale 45.4 

Total 52,004.5 

 

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment 

Area NOxEmissions from EGUs 

2007 

State Facility NOx Emissions, tons / year 

Indiana 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 8,739.2 

Kentucky East Bend 5,563.0 

Ohio Madison Generating Station 44.3 

Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 9,754.6 

Ohio 

William H Zimmer Generating 

Station 13,736.6 

Ohio 

Walter C Beckjord Generating 

Station 13,031.8 

Ohio Woodsdale 110.1 

Total 50,979.6 
D-7

 

Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Entire Nonattainment 

Area NOxEmissions from EGUs 

2008 

State Facility NOx Emissions, tons / year 

Indiana 

American Electric Power (AEP)-

Tanners Creek Generating Station 7,429.2 

Kentucky East Bend 4,492.4 

Ohio Madison Generating Station 16.1 

Ohio Miami Fort Generating Station 12,371.7 

Ohio 

William H Zimmer Generating 

Station 16,531.1 

Ohio 

Walter C Beckjord Generating 

Station 7,549.0 

Ohio Woodsdale 74.5 

Total 48,464.0 
APPENDIX E 

2008 Base Year Emissions Inventory and 2015 and 

2020 Projected Emissions Inventory for Nitrogen 

Oxides (NOx) and Volatile Organic Compounds 

(VOC) All Emission Sources for Lawrenceburg 

Township, Dearborn County, Indiana and Entire 

Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment 

Area 
This page left intentionally blank.
E-1 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 

All Anthropogenic Source Emission Totals 

(Tons per Day) 

Year NOx VOC 

2008 33.09 7.49 

2015 32.07 6.86 

2020 32.56 6.96 

 

2008 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 

All Anthropogenic Sources 

(Tons per Day) 

 AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL 

NOX 0.26 1.14 1.14 30.55 33.09

VOC 2.42 0.74 0.75 3.58 7.49

 

2015 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 

All Anthropogenic Sources 

(Tons per Day) 

 AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL 

NOX 0.27 0.78 0.60 30.42 32.07

VOC 1.79 0.62 0.50 3.95 6.86

 

2020 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County, Indiana 

All Anthropogenic Sources 

(Tons per Day) 

 AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL 

NOX 0.27 0.65 0.42 31.22 32.56

VOC 1.79 0.60 0.42 4.15 6.96
E-2

Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected NOx Emissions for 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County 

31.40

31.60

31.80

32.00

32.20

32.40

32.60

32.80

33.00

33.20

2008 2015 2020

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

NOX

Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions for 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County

6.50

6.60

6.70

6.80

6.90

7.00

7.10

7.20

7.30

7.40

7.50

7.60

2008 2015 2020

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

VOC
E-3

Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

All Anthropogenic Source Emission Totals 

(Tons per Day) 

Year NOx VOC 

2008 344.32 187.66 

2015 313.96 161.30 

2020 297.25 137.14 

 

2008 

Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

All Anthropogenic Sources 

(Tons per Day) 

 AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL 

NOX 21.38 62.35 113.45 147.14 344.32

VOC 78.36 39.04 55.47 14.79 187.66

 

2015 

Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

All Anthropogenic Sources 

(Tons per Day) 

 AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL 

NOX 21.38 45.73 54.01 192.84 313.96

VOC 74.69 33.65 35.35 17.61 161.30

 

2020 

Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

All Anthropogenic Sources 

(Tons per Day) 

 AREA NONROAD ONROAD POINT GRAND TOTAL 

NOX 21.38 39.27 38.17 198.43 297.25

VOC 54.52 32.09 32.13 18.59 137.14
E-4

Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected NOx Emissions for the 

Entire Nonattainment Area

270.00

280.00

290.00

300.00

310.00

320.00

330.00

340.00

350.00

2008 2015 2020

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

NOX

Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions for the 

Entire Nonattainment Area

-

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

140.00

160.00

180.00

200.00

2008 2015 2020

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

VOC
E-5

Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected NOx Emissions for 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County Indiana, and Kentucky and Ohio

-

50.00

100.00

150.00

200.00

250.00

2008 2015 2020

Year

Tons Per Summer Day

Lawrenceburg Township, IN Kentucky Ohio

Comparison of 2008 Emissions and 2015 and 2020 Projected VOC Emissions for 

Lawrenceburg Township, Dearborn County Indiana, and Kentucky and Ohio

-

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

140.00

160.00

2008 2015 2020 Year

Tons Per Summer Day

Lawrenceburg Township, IN Kentucky Ohio
E-6

2008 

Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

All Anthropogenic Sources 

(Tons per Day) 

State County Sector NOX VOC 

Indiana Dearborn County AREA 0.26 2.42

Indiana Dearborn County NONROAD 1.14 0.74

Indiana Dearborn County ONROAD 1.14 0.75

Indiana Dearborn County EGU 27.34 0.35

Indiana Dearborn County POINT 3.21 3.23

Kentucky Boone County AREA 5.02 8.41

Kentucky Boone County NONROAD 11.02 5.07

Kentucky Boone County ONROAD 8.53 4.00

Kentucky Boone County EGU 23.15 0.17

Kentucky Boone County POINT 0.12 2.64

Kentucky Campbell County AREA 1.32 4.34

Kentucky Campbell County NONROAD 5.34 1.51

Kentucky Campbell County ONROAD 4.88 2.29

Kentucky Campbell County EGU 0.00 0.00

Kentucky Campbell County POINT 0.02 0.28

Kentucky Kenton County AREA 4.06 7.88

Kentucky Kenton County NONROAD 7.33 1.95

Kentucky Kenton County ONROAD 8.37 3.85

Kentucky Kenton County EGU 0.00 0.00

Kentucky Kenton County POINT 0.03 1.17

Ohio Butler County AREA 2.18 10.31

Ohio Butler County NONROAD 8.89 5.68

Ohio Butler County ONROAD 16.05 7.87

Ohio Butler County EGU 1.34 0.02

Ohio Butler County POINT 10.53 2.77

Ohio Clermont County AREA 1.67 6.05

Ohio Clermont County NONROAD 4.22 3.68

Ohio Clermont County ONROAD 11.05 5.42

Ohio Clermont County EGU 44.65 0.20

Ohio Clermont County POINT 0.18 0.09

Ohio Clinton County AREA 0.43 2.85

Ohio Clinton County NONROAD 2.01 1.65

Ohio Clinton County ONROAD 3.87 2.33

Ohio Clinton County EGU 0.00 0.00

Ohio Clinton County POINT 0.00 0.00

Ohio Hamilton County AREA 5.27 28.80

Ohio Hamilton County NONROAD 17.21 14.66

Ohio Hamilton County ONROAD 46.80 22.70

Ohio Hamilton County EGU 27.26 0.20

Ohio Hamilton County POINT 6.17 2.85

Ohio Warren County AREA 1.17 7.30

Ohio Warren County NONROAD 5.19 4.10

Ohio Warren County ONROAD 12.76 6.26

Ohio Warren County EGU 0.00 0.00

Ohio Warren County POINT 3.14 0.82
E-7

2015 

Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

All Anthropogenic Sources 

(Tons per Day) 

State County Sector NOX VOC 

Indiana Dearborn County AREA 0.27 1.79

Indiana Dearborn County NONROAD 0.78 0.62

Indiana Dearborn County ONROAD 0.60 0.50

Indiana Dearborn County EGU 25.30 0.44

Indiana Dearborn County POINT 5.12 3.51

Kentucky Boone County AREA 5.03 8.50

Kentucky Boone County NONROAD 9.77 4.55

Kentucky Boone County ONROAD 4.63 3.17

Kentucky Boone County EGU 24.97 0.18

Kentucky Boone County POINT 0.11 2.86

Kentucky Campbell County AREA 1.30 4.20

Kentucky Campbell County NONROAD 4.57 1.29

Kentucky Campbell County ONROAD 2.54 1.74

Kentucky Campbell County EGU 0.00 0.00

Kentucky Campbell County POINT 0.02 0.30

Kentucky Kenton County AREA 4.02 7.66

Kentucky Kenton County NONROAD 6.15 1.76

Kentucky Kenton County ONROAD 4.23 2.85

Kentucky Kenton County EGU 0.00 0.00

Kentucky Kenton County POINT 0.03 1.31

Ohio Butler County AREA 2.19 9.76

Ohio Butler County NONROAD 5.91 4.95

Ohio Butler County ONROAD 7.55 4.87

Ohio Butler County EGU 2.86 0.02

Ohio Butler County POINT 11.98 4.25

Ohio Clermont County AREA 1.67 5.74

Ohio Clermont County NONROAD 2.76 3.13

Ohio Clermont County ONROAD 5.10 3.29

Ohio Clermont County EGU 83.88 0.63

Ohio Clermont County POINT 0.16 0.26

Ohio Clinton County AREA 0.43 2.72

Ohio Clinton County NONROAD 1.39 1.26

Ohio Clinton County ONROAD 2.02 1.47

Ohio Clinton County EGU 0.00 0.00

Ohio Clinton County POINT 0.00 0.00

Ohio Hamilton County AREA 5.30 27.38

Ohio Hamilton County NONROAD 11.18 12.70

Ohio Hamilton County ONROAD 21.11 13.44

Ohio Hamilton County EGU 28.32 0.31

Ohio Hamilton County POINT 7.39 2.97

Ohio Warren County AREA 1.17 6.94

Ohio Warren County NONROAD 3.22 3.39

Ohio Warren County ONROAD 6.23 4.02

Ohio Warren County EGU 0.00 0.00

Ohio Warren County POINT 2.70 0.57
E-8

2020 

Entire Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Nonattainment Area 

All Anthropogenic Sources 

(Tons per Day) 

State County Sector NOX VOC 

Indiana Dearborn County AREA 0.27 1.79

Indiana Dearborn County NONROAD 0.65 0.60

Indiana Dearborn County ONROAD 0.42 0.42

Indiana Dearborn County EGU 26.03 0.46

Indiana Dearborn County POINT 5.19 3.69

Kentucky Boone County AREA 5.03 8.50

Kentucky Boone County NONROAD 9.48 4.36

Kentucky Boone County ONROAD 3.45 2.96

Kentucky Boone County EGU 26.35 0.19

Kentucky Boone County POINT 0.12 3.01

Kentucky Campbell County AREA 1.30 4.20

Kentucky Campbell County NONROAD 4.34 1.22

Kentucky Campbell County ONROAD 1.81 1.55

Kentucky Campbell County EGU 0.00 0.00

Kentucky Campbell County POINT 0.03 0.31

Kentucky Kenton County AREA 4.02 7.66

Kentucky Kenton County NONROAD 5.75 1.73

Kentucky Kenton County ONROAD 3.01 2.56

Kentucky Kenton County EGU 0.00 0.00

Kentucky Kenton County POINT 0.03 1.42

Ohio Butler County AREA 2.19 9.76

Ohio Butler County NONROAD 4.64 4.80

Ohio Butler County ONROAD 5.37 4.50

Ohio Butler County EGU 2.95 0.02

Ohio Butler County POINT 11.91 4.56

Ohio Clermont County AREA 1.67 5.74

Ohio Clermont County NONROAD 2.17 2.96

Ohio Clermont County ONROAD 3.63 3.04

Ohio Clermont County EGU 86.27 0.66

Ohio Clermont County POINT 0.16 0.27

Ohio Clinton County AREA 0.43 2.72

Ohio Clinton County NONROAD 1.13 1.08

Ohio Clinton County ONROAD 1.41 1.22

Ohio Clinton County EGU 0.00 0.00

Ohio Clinton County POINT 0.00 0.00

Ohio Hamilton County AREA 5.30 27.38

Ohio Hamilton County NONROAD 8.73 12.19

Ohio Hamilton County ONROAD 14.44 12.00

Ohio Hamilton County EGU 29.13 0.31

Ohio Hamilton County POINT 7.56 3.12

Ohio Warren County AREA 1.17 6.94

Ohio Warren County NONROAD 2.38 3.15

Ohio Warren County ONROAD 4.63 3.88

Ohio Warren County EGU 0.00 0.00

Ohio Warren County POINT 2.70 0.57
APPENDIX F 

Mobile Source Input/Output Calculation Files 
F - 1 

This page left intentionally blank. 
MOBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS INVENTORY FOR THE 

CINCINNATI OZONE NONATTAINMENT AREA 

Includes a portion of Dearborn County Indiana, the counties of Boone, Campbell, Kenton 

in Kentucky, and the counties of Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton, and Warren in 

Ohio. Emission Estimates for the Year 2005, 2008, 2015 and 2020 developed in support 

of the Ozone SIP 

OCTOBER 2009 

Revised 

Prepared for the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, the Kentucky 

Division for Air Quality and the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency by 

OKI Regional Council of Governments

Acknowledgments 

Title Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for Cincinnati Ozone 

Nonattainment Area 

Abstract This report documents the methodology and results from the 

development of the mobile source emission inventory for 

ozone precursors in the Cincinnati ozone nonattainment area. 

The nonattainment area includes a portion of Dearborn County 

Indiana, Boone, Campbell and Kenton counties in Kentucky, 

and Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton and Warren counties 

in Ohio. The ozone precursors include volatile organic 

compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx). The new 

2005, 2008, 2015, and 2020 inventory, as provided in this 

report, includes the benefits of low RVP fuel in Butler, 

Clermont, Hamilton and Warren counties. It is expected that 

the 2008 inventory, plus an additional safety margin, will be 

established as the revised 8-hour ozone motor vehicle 

emissions budgets for the Cincinnati nonattainment area. 

Date October 2009 

Agency Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments 

 Mark Policinski, Executive Director 

 

Project Manager Robert Koehler, P.E., Deputy Director 

Project Staff Andrew J. Reser, AICP, Principal Author 

 Harikishan Perugu 

 

 

The preparation of this document was financed cooperatively by the Federal Highway 

Administration, the Federal Transit Administration, the Commonwealth of Kentucky 

Transportation Cabinet, the Ohio Department of Transportation, and the units of local and 

county government in the OKI region. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed 

in this document are those of the OKI Regional Council of Governments and are not 

necessarily those of the U.S. Department of Transportation. This report does not 

constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. 

Table of Contents 

Page

1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 

 Figure 1-Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area ..............................................................2 

2. Mobile Source Emission Forecast Process .......................................................................3 

3. Mobile Source Emission Inventory ..................................................................................7 

Table 1-Mobile Source Emissions Inventory by State/County for the Cincinnati 

Ozone Nonattainment Area...............................................................................................7 

Table 1-Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Indiana and Ohio Portions of 

the Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area .......................................................................8 

Table 2-Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Kentucky Portion of the 

Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area .............................................................................8 

Appendix A – MOBILE6.2 Input/Output Files for the Indiana Portion of the 

Nonattainment Area 

Appendix B – MOBILE6.2 Input/Output Files for the Kentucky Portion of the 

Nonattainment Area 

Appendix C – MOBILE6.2 Input/Output Files for the Ohio Portion of the 

Nonattainment Area 

Appendix D – Air Quality Impact Summary for the OKI Portion of the 

Nonattainment Area and Emissions by State/County 

Appendix E – Clinton County Air Quality Analysis 
 

 

 

 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

1 

1. INTRODUCTION 

At the request of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, the Kentucky 

Division for Air Quality, and the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, the OhioKentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments (OKI) has prepared this mobile 

source emissions inventory of ozone precursor pollutants. Pursuant to provisions of the 

CAAA of 1990, U.S. EPA designated a nine county area in the Cincinnati area as a basic 

nonattainment area for ozone under the eight-hour ozone standard in April 2004. The 

Cincinnati ozone nonattainment area includes Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn 

County Indiana, the Kentucky counties of Boone, Campbell and Kenton, and the Ohio 

counties of Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton and Warren (Figure 1). Ozone is formed 

through chemical reactions induced when sunlight reacts with volatile organic 

compounds (VOCs; principally hydrocarbons) and nitrogen oxides (NOX). VOCs and 

NOX occur from incomplete combustion of fossil fuels. Transportation-related sources 

are a major contributor of these pollutants. Since heat speeds the reactions, ozone levels 

are typically highest during hot summer days. 

 

The OKI Regional Council of Governments, as the Metropolitan Planning Organization 

(MPO), consists of Dearborn, Boone, Campbell, Kenton, Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and 

Warren counties. The cities of Franklin and Carlisle in Warren County are part of the 

Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission (MVRPC) planning area. Emissions for 

this portion of Warren County have been included in the inventory. Clinton County is 

outside of the OKI region, but is part of the ozone nonattainment area. The Ohio 

Department of Transportation (ODOT) is the lead planning agency for Clinton County. 

The Clinton County emissions analysis has been prepared by ODOT and has been 

included in this emissions inventory. 

OKI, as the MPO, is responsible for transportation planning and air quality/transportation 

conformity. Transportation conformity is a mechanism to ensure that federal funding and 

approval are given to those transportation activities that are consistent with the air quality 

goals of the State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio. The 

SIPs include an inventory of projected emissions from vehicles. The projected inventory 

is also known as the emissions budget. This budget establishes a maximum allowable 

limit on future emissions from vehicles (mobile sources). OKI’s transportation plans and 

programs must be shown to be in conformity with all SIP provisions. The conformity 

process is a quantitative analysis, using U.S.EPA’s vehicle emissions software (currently 

MOBILE), demonstrating that forecasted regional vehicle emissions do not exceed the 

established budget. 

This report documents the process for developing the mobile emissions inventory for the 

Cincinnati ozone nonattainment area. Section 2 details the process and procedures used 

and Section 3 describes the transportation network. Section 4 provides the mobile 

emissions inventory. 






HHHHiiiigggghhhhllllaaaannnndddd

BBBBrrrraaaccckkkkeeeennnn

PPPPeeeennnnddddlllleeeettttoooonnnn

aattttiiiinnnn

BBBBoooooooonnnneeee

KKKKeeeennnnttttoooonnnn

CCCCaaaammmmppppbbbbeeeellllllll

HHHHaaaammmmiiiillllttttoooonnnn

FFFFaaaayyyyeeeetttttttteeee

GGGGrrrreeeeeeeennnneeee

CCCiinncciinnnnaattii Cincinnati Cincinnati Cincinnati CCiinncciinnnnaattii Ciinncciinnnnaattii

Greenfield

Manchester

Bethel

Washington Court House

GGGGrrrraaaannnntttt

AAAAddddaaaammmssss

BBBBrrrroooowwwwnnnn

BBBBuuuuttttlllleeeerrrr

CCCClllleeeerrrrmmmmoooonnnntttt

CCCClllliiiinnnnttttoooonnnn

WWWWaaaarrrrrrrreeeennnn

Oxford

Wilmington

Hamilton

Blanchester

Hillsboro

Georgetown

Ripley

nnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area

Dearborn Co (part)

Lawrenceburg Township

Boone CoCampbell CoKenton CoButler CoClermont CoClinton CoHamilton CoWarren Co

daries and locations are for illustrative purposes only. This is not a regulatory document.
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

3 

2. MOBILE SOURCE EMISSION FORECAST PROCESS 

OKI Travel Demand Model 

Transportation system performance was estimated using the OKI Travel Demand Model 

Version 7.6. The OKI Travel Demand Model is composed of TRANPLAN programs, 

CUBE Voyager programs and a series of FORTRAN programs written by OKI. It is a 

state of the practice model that uses the standard 4 phase sequential modeling approach of 

trip generation, distribution, modal choice and assignment. The model uses demographic 

and land use data and capacity and free-flow speed characteristics for each roadway 

segment in the network to produce a “loaded” highway network with forecasted traffic 

volumes with revised speeds based on specified speed/capacity relationships. 

Travel analysis zones are the basic geographic unit for estimating travel in the OKI 

model. The OKI region is subdivided into 1608 traffic analysis zones to permit detail as 

well as manageability. A variety of socioeconomic data items are used in the OKI 

transportation planning process. These data are used primarily to forecast future travel 

patterns by serving as independent variables in OKI trip generation equations. The 

following categories of planning data are utilized:

• Population (household and group quarter) 

• Households 

• Household vehicles 

• Employment (by employment category and zone of work) 

• Labor force participation (by zone of residence) 

• Area type 

The principal data requirements of the OKI travel demand forecasting model are 

population and employment. From these variables, other characteristics including 

households, labor force, and personal vehicles may be derived. OKI utilizes both base 

year (2005) and future year data (2010, 2020 and 2030) in the planning process. Other 

years are interpolated as needed. Planning data are maintained at the Traffic Analysis 

Zone (TAZ) level, and originate in the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Base 

year 2005 and future year data for each variable are developed through various methods. 

More detailed explanation of base year and future year data generation for each of the 

above-mentioned categories of planning data follows. All of the variables represent the 

latest OKI planning assumptions. 

Population 

Base and Future Year Data: Population data for base year 2005 and future years 2010, 

2020 and 2030 originate with the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Utilizing 

ArcView GIS, population data at the zonal level for 2000 was derived from the area 

proportion allocation of block level population. 

As a tri-state regional planning agency, OKI uses county level projections as prepared by 

the respective state data centers (Ohio Department of Development Office of Strategic 

Research, Kentucky State Data Center and Indiana Business Research Center) as control 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

4 

totals. The most current projections (years 2005 to 2030) were released by the Ohio and 

Indiana state data centers in 2003 and the Kentucky State Data Center in 2004. 

Population projections at the zonal level are calculated by multiplying household size by 

the projected zonal households. Household size is factored so that, in each county, the 

sum of the zonal populations equals the control total. 

Households 

Base Year Data: Household data for base year 2005 originates with the 2000 Census of 

Population and Housing. Utilizing the geographic information system ArcMap, 

household data at the zonal level for 2000 was derived from the area proportion 

allocation of block level households. Year 2000 household data was updated to 2005 with 

residential building permits issued between January 2000 and December 2004. The 

residential building locations were geocoded in ArcMap, then aggregated to the TAZs. 

The housing unit totals for each TAZ were converted to households by applying a 

vacancy rate, an adjustment for permitted but unbuilt units, and subtracting demolitions 

(where data was available). These households were then added to the year Census 2000 

zonal household total to arrive at 2005 households for each TAZ. 

Future Year Data: The preparation of household projections was accomplished by 

calculating the number of households for a projected county population using ratios of 

householders to total population by age specific cohorts derived from the 2000 Census 

for each analysis year. Disaggregation to TAZs was determined by historical trends, 

existing and future land use, topography, flood plain information, availability of land, 

local knowledge and other factors. 

Household Vehicles 

Base and Future Year Data: Base and future year household vehicle data were obtained 

from the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. The 2000 Census is the only source of 

household vehicle data available at the block group level. Average vehicles per 

household were calculated for block groups then applied to the TAZs associated with 

each block group. The 2005, 2010, 2020 and 2030 vehicles per household level was held 

at the 2000 level based on the fact that, since 2002, the number of vehicles per household 

has exceeded the number of drivers per household. 

Labor Force 

Base and Future Year Data: The OKI labor force is a function of the population as 

determined by a labor force participation ratio (the number of employed persons in the 

labor force per persons 16 and over). Household data for base year 2005 originates with 

the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Utilizing the geographic information system 

ArcMap, household data at the zonal level for 2000 was derived from the area proportion 

allocation of block group level employed labor force. The labor force projections for 

2005, 2010, 2020 and 2030 were based on the most recent projections of national labor 

force participation rates by age and sex cohorts from the U.S. Department of Labor, 

Bureau of Labor Statistics for each of those years. These rates were then applied to the 

projected county age/sex cohorts and adjusted to eliminate the unemployed to arrive at a 

county employed labor force control total. Employed labor force at the zonal level is 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

5 

calculated by multiplying the labor force participation rate by the zonal population. The 

labor force participation rate is adjusted so that, in each county, the sum of the zonal 

labor force counts equals the control total. 

Employment 

Base Year Data: Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW or ES202) data 

for 2005 was utilized as the primary tool to calculate employment at the zonal level. 

Individual business records containing physical location, number of employees and SIC 

code were geocoded through ArcMap and aggregated to the TAZ level. This data set was 

supplemented by other sources of data to complete the commuting employment picture in 

the OKI region. Each zone’s employment was divided according to the SIC code into 

three classes (retail, office, industrial) based upon the potential for generating trips. 

Future Year Data: For future year employment projection, calculation was first made of 

the employment at the regional level. At the regional level, employment is a calculation 

of the region’s employed labor force minus workers who live in the region but commute 

out to work, plus workers who live outside the region but commute in to work. The 

regional total was disaggregated first to the county level based on historic trends and 

expected changes in the county’s share of the region’s employment and then to the TAZ 

level. Disaggregation to TAZs was determined by historical trends, existing and future 

land use, topography, flood plain information, availability of land, local knowledge and 

other factors. 

Area Type 

Base and Future Year Data: For each analysis year, each TAZ is assigned an area type 

designation as CBD, Urban, Suburban or Rural based on population and employment 

densities. 

Model Calibration

OKI’s Travel Demand Model has been validated to observed traffic volumes for the 

model base year 2005. The modeling network encompasses the entire ozone 

nonattainment area with the exception of Clinton County, Ohio. The modeling network 

also includes Greene, Miami and Montgomery counties in Ohio and the remainder of 

Dearborn County Indiana. The difference between estimated vehicle miles traveled 

(VMT) and 2005 observed VMT is less than 1%. A highway screenline analysis 

compares the screenline observed and simulated traffic volume discrepancies with the 

ODOT standard of maximum desirable deviation. The comparison shows that the model 

performs at a satisfactory level and all the errors were under the ODOT curve. Further 

information can be found in OKI’s 2007 report, “OKI/MVRPC Travel Demand Model 

Methodology/ Validation Report”. For the calibration, OKI used over 3000 traffic counts 

collected through 2006 by the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT), the Kentucky 

Transportation Cabinet, many county and local governments, transportation engineering 

consultants, and OKI. These traffic counts cover nearly 50% percent of the links in the 

OKI portion of the modeling network. The methodology provides consistency with past 

emission inventory and conformity analysis work performed by OKI. 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

6 

Local Inputs and Post-Model Processing

OKI incorporates a variety of sources of local data to both improve and confirm the 

accuracy of VMT, as well as other travel-related parameters. Free flow speeds used on 

the highway and transit networks are based on travel time studies performed locally. The 

OKI post-processing program, IMPACT, uses the loaded highway network to generate 

VMT by hour, VMT by speed distribution and VMT by facility type. These tables are 

then included as input into MOBILE6.2. Two separate sets of VMT tables are generated: 

one for the four Ohio counties plus Dearborn County Indiana, and a second for the three 

Kentucky counties. The VMT by hour tables utilize hourly traffic distribution and 

directional split factors for different roadway types as developed by OKI. The main 

source of the data was the permanent traffic counting stations located throughout the OKI 

region for the years of 1998-2002. This data was supplemented with data collected at 

coverage count stations (locations with counts taken on only one-two days). The stations 

were classified by area type: urban and rural, and functional classification: freeway, 

arterial and collector. Speeds representing various “loaded” conditions (with traffic 

volumes) are estimated using techniques from the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual. This 

permits the estimation of speeds as conditions vary from hour to hour on the different 

facility types throughout the region. The IMPACT program performs the appropriate 

summation by area and roadway type as well as regional totals. OKI has also developed 

seasonal conversion factors to adjust traffic volumes to summer conditions. The factors 

were derived from local data collected at permanent traffic counting stations during 1994-

1997 utilizing the average daily traffic monthly conversion factors for June, July and 

August. Further information on OKI’s IMPACT program is documented in the report, 

“Travel Demand Model Summary Reporting and Impact Summary Reporting: 

OKI/MVRPC Travel Demand Model User’s Guide”, OKI 2003. 

Emission Factor Model

OKI’s conformity assessment utilized U.S.EPA’s emissions model MOBILE6.2 to 

develop emission factors for VOC’s, NOX and PM2.5. The MOBILE6.2 input file 

contains local parameters, developed through consultation with ODOT and OEPA, for 

temperature, fuel programs and fuel characteristics. The local parameters are combined 

with the VMT tables from the OKI Travel Demand Model to produce one set of emission 

factors measured in grams per mile for the appropriate calendar year (from 1952 to 

2050). These emission factors are then multiplied by VMT. The methodologies 

incorporated into MOBILE6.2 for estimating emissions are based on methods and 

research conducted by U.S.EPA. OKI’s development of MOBILE6.2 input values were 

guided by the U.S.EPA’s document “Technical Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6 for 

Emission Inventory Preparation”, January 2002. MOBILE6.2 inputs and outputs are 

included in the appendices. 

 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

7 

3. MOBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS INVENTORY 

Table 1. Mobile Source Emissions by State/County for the Cincinnati Ozone Nonattainment Area 

(tons per day) 

State 2005 2008 2015 2020

Dearborn NonAttainment Portion 

VOC 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.42

NOx 1.44 1.14 0.60 0.42

Kentucky 

Boone 

VOC 4.33 4.00 3.17 2.96

CO 47.20 44.46 37.41 38.21

NOx 10.27 8.53 4.63 3.45

Campbell 

VOC 2.52 2.29 1.74 1.55

CO 27.50 25.52 20.39 19.97

NOx 5.98 4.88 2.54 1.81

Kenton 

VOC 4.32 3.85 2.85 2.56

CO 47.19 42.76 33.68 32.97

NOx 10.39 8.37 4.23 3.01

OKI KY Total 

VOC 11.17 10.14 7.76 7.07

CO 121.89 112.74 91.48 91.14

NOx 26.64 21.78 11.40 8.27

Ohio 

Butler 

VOC 9.94 7.87 4.87 4.50

NOx 18.88 16.05 7.55 5.37

Clermont 

VOC 6.86 5.42 3.29 3.04

NOx 13.04 11.05 5.10 3.63

Hamilton 

VOC 29.47 22.70 13.44 12.00

NOx 56.51 46.80 21.11 14.44

Warren 

VOC 7.97 6.26 4.02 3.88

NOx 15.15 12.76 6.23 4.63

OKI OH Total 

VOC 54.24 42.25 25.62 23.42

NOx 103.58 86.66 39.99 28.07

 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

8 

Table 1 Cont. 

Clinton, OH 

VOC 3.02 2.33 1.47 1.22

NOx 5.07 3.87 2.02 1.41

OH VOC Total 57.26 44.58 27.09 24.64

OH NOx Total 108.65 90.53 42.01 29.48

NonAttainment Area Total 

VOC 69.43 55.47 35.35 32.13

NOx 136.73 113.45 54.01 38.17

The mobile source VOC and NOx emissions inventory for all counties in the 

nonattainment area is provided in Table 1. Table 2 shows the mobile source inventory 

for the combined Indiana and Ohio portions of the Cincinnati ozone nonattainment area. 

Table 3 is the mobile source emissions inventory for the Kentucky portion of the 

nonattainment area. At the discretion of the Indiana Department of Environmental 

Management, the Kentucky Division for Air Quality and the Ohio EPA, an additional 

safety margin may be added to the 2008 inventory for the purpose of establishing a motor 

vehicle emission budget (MVEB). The addition of this safety margin would not interfere 

with the SIPs purpose. In the absence of an additional safety margin, the 2008 inventory, 

as presented below, will serve as the (MVEB) for transportation conformity. 

Table 2 

Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Indiana and Ohio Portions of the Cincinnati Ozone 

Nonattainment Area (tons per day) 

 2005 2008 MVEB 2015 2020

VOC 58.26 45.33 27.59 25.06

NOx 110.09 91.67 42.61 29.90

 

Table 3 

Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Kentucky Portion of the Cincinnati Ozone 

Nonattainment Area (tons per day) 

 2005 2008 MVEB 2015 2020

VOC 11.17 10.14 7.76 7.07

NOx 26.64 21.78 11.40 8.27

 

 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

9 

APPENDIX A

MOBILE6.2 Input/Output Files for Indiana Portion of

Nonattainment Area 

 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

10 

VMT By Hour (INHVMT.D), all analysis years

VMT BY HOUR 

 0.0478 0.0719 0.0796 0.0666 0.0563 0.0532 

 0.0545 0.0543 0.0515 0.0523 0.0560 0.0565 

 0.0504 0.0377 0.0266 0.0209 0.0197 0.0171 

 0.0142 0.0156 0.0188 0.0224 0.0251 0.0310

2005 VMT by Speed Bin (INSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 

1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0115 0.0098 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9787

1 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0047 0.0053 0.0085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9814

1 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0044 0.0049 0.0079 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9828

1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0093 0.0079 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9829

1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0090 0.0077 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9833

1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0096 0.0082 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9822

1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0093 0.0079 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9827

1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0090 0.0076 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9834

1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0086 0.0073 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9841

1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0083 0.0070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9847

1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0080 0.0068 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9852

1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0067 0.0057 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9876

1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0066 0.0056 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9878

1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0079 0.0067 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9853

1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0080 0.0068 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9852

1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0076 0.0065 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9859

1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0085 0.0073 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9842

1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0075 0.0063 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9862

1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0088 0.0075 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9837

1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0098 0.0083 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9819

1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0094 0.0080 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9827

1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0098 0.0083 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9818

1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0100 0.0085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9815

1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0104 0.0089 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9807

2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1622 0.0097 0.1308 0.0417 0.0908 0.5647 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1713 0.0099 0.1305 0.0452 0.0877 0.5553 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1783 0.0101 0.1313 0.0453 0.0886 0.5464 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2060 0.0103 0.1221 0.0379 0.0894 0.5343 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2128 0.0104 0.1212 0.0375 0.0893 0.5288 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2008 0.0101 0.1206 0.0375 0.0880 0.5430 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2200 0.0104 0.1172 0.0360 0.0876 0.5288 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2243 0.0106 0.1184 0.0363 0.0886 0.5217 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2208 0.0106 0.1200 0.0369 0.0892 0.5226 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2360 0.0108 0.1176 0.0358 0.0891 0.5108 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2240 0.0107 0.1216 0.0374 0.0904 0.5159 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2072 0.0105 0.1266 0.0394 0.0918 0.5244 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2062 0.0108 0.1324 0.0414 0.0950 0.5141 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1941 0.0107 0.1370 0.0433 0.0967 0.5182 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2127 0.0109 0.1325 0.0414 0.0956 0.5069 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2142 0.0109 0.1304 0.0406 0.0945 0.5094 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2076 0.0106 0.1272 0.0396 0.0922 0.5228 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2327 0.0110 0.1233 0.0378 0.0920 0.5032 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2009 0.0097 0.1118 0.0345 0.0832 0.5600 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1925 0.0096 0.1137 0.0353 0.0836 0.5652 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2259 0.0108 0.1228 0.0378 0.0913 0.5114 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1941 0.0104 0.1305 0.0410 0.0931 0.5308 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1926 0.0105 0.1339 0.0422 0.0949 0.5258 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1856 0.0103 0.1314 0.0415 0.0929 0.5383 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2005 VMT by Facility (INFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 

 1 0.236 0.530 0.229 0.005 

 0.258 0.508 0.229 0.005 

 0.261 0.500 0.234 0.005 

 0.260 0.487 0.248 0.005 

 0.259 0.484 0.253 0.004 

 0.256 0.495 0.244 0.005 

 0.252 0.486 0.257 0.004 

 0.252 0.482 0.262 0.004 

 0.260 0.478 0.258 0.004 

 0.263 0.467 0.266 0.004 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

11 

 0.267 0.470 0.259 0.004 

 0.301 0.457 0.238 0.004 

 0.290 0.461 0.246 0.004 

 0.255 0.489 0.252 0.004 

 0.247 0.484 0.266 0.004 

 0.260 0.476 0.261 0.004 

 0.257 0.485 0.254 0.004 

 0.274 0.458 0.264 0.004 

 0.296 0.475 0.225 0.005 

 0.279 0.490 0.225 0.005 

 0.248 0.480 0.268 0.004 

 0.239 0.504 0.252 0.004 

 0.228 0.510 0.258 0.004 

 0.230 0.516 0.249 0.005 

... 

Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel 

transit buses 

 26 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

2005 MOBILE6.2 Input File (INSCN.IN) 

* Mobile6 file for Dearborn County, IN 

* created 6/7/06, ajr,pre 2006 

******************* Header Section ************************ 

MOBILE6 INPUT FILE : 

POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO 

PARTICULATES : 

* PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE 

REPORT FILE : in.rpt 

DATABASE OUTPUT : 

WITH FIELDNAMES : 

DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22 

DAILY OUTPUT : 

EMISSIONS TABLE : inemiss.tb1 

RUN DATA 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

12 

******************* Run Section *************************** 

VMT BY HOUR : INHVMT.D 

SPEED VMT : INSVMT.D 

VMT BY FACILITY : INFVMT.D 

*REG DIST : INREG.D 

EXPRESS HC AS VOC : 

EXPAND BUS EFS : 

******************* Summer Scenario Section ********************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : Indiana Emissions - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2005 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

SEASON : 1 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 61.0 95.0 

ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY : 75.0 

FUEL PROGRAM : 1 

FUEL RVP : 9.0 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 313.00 

******************* Annual Scenario Section ********************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : Indiana Emissions - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2005 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 

FUEL PROGRAM : 1 

FUEL RVP : 9.0 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 318.00 

******************* End of Run **************************** 

END OF RUN 

2005 MOBILE6.2 Output Report (IN.RPT) 

*************************************************************************** 

* MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * 

* Input file: INSCN.IN (file 1, run 1). * 

*************************************************************************** 

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: INHVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external 

* data file: INSVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: INFVMT.D 

 Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors 

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Indiana Emissions - CY20xx 

* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Basic Emissiion Rates 

* from the external data file PMNH3BER.D 

* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Sulfur Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMNH3SDR.D 

 Calendar Year: 2005 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 61.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 95.0 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi 

 Weathered RVP: 8.5 psi 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 92. ppm 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

13 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: No 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.4158 0.3387 0.1165 0.0360 0.0006 0.0019 0.0849 0.0057 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 1.421 1.461 2.332 1.684 2.335 0.626 0.870 0.620 3.37 1.516 

 Composite CO : 12.72 15.11 20.39 16.46 22.20 1.741 1.521 3.691 20.98 14.019 

 Composite NOX : 0.948 1.148 1.483 1.234 4.207 1.485 1.544 12.551 1.20 2.183 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0009 0.0016 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 9.702 0.586 0.842 

 Composite CO : 137.29 4.535 3.219 

 Composite NOX : 8.274 15.786 13.826 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Indiana Emissions - CY20xx 

* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 Calendar Year: 2005 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi 

 Weathered RVP: 9.0 psi 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 92. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: No 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.4158 0.3387 0.1165 0.0360 0.0006 0.0019 0.0849 0.0057 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 1.148 1.297 2.093 1.501 1.786 0.626 0.870 0.620 2.22 1.292 

 Composite CO : 15.35 18.58 24.01 19.97 20.81 1.741 1.521 3.691 17.79 16.641 

 Composite NOX : 0.924 1.190 1.544 1.281 4.334 1.485 1.544 12.551 1.41 2.200 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0009 0.0016 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 7.662 0.586 0.842 

 Composite CO : 118.47 4.535 3.219 

 Composite NOX : 8.782 15.786 13.826 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2008 VMT by Speed bin (INSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 

1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0132 0.0090 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9779

1 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0047 0.0068 0.0078 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9807

1 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0044 0.0063 0.0072 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9821

1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0106 0.0072 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9822

1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0103 0.0070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9827

1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0110 0.0075 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9815

1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0107 0.0073 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9820

1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0103 0.0070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9827

1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0098 0.0067 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9835

1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0095 0.0064 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9841

1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0092 0.0062 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9846

1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0077 0.0052 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9871

1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0076 0.0052 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9873

1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0091 0.0062 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9848

1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0092 0.0062 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9846
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

14 

1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0087 0.0059 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9853

1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0098 0.0067 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9836

1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0086 0.0058 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9856

1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0101 0.0069 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9831

1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0112 0.0076 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9812

1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0107 0.0073 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9820

1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0112 0.0076 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9811

1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0115 0.0078 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9807

1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0119 0.0081 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9799

2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1745 0.0083 0.1008 0.0469 0.0340 0.6355 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1844 0.0088 0.1002 0.0507 0.0299 0.6260 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1909 0.0091 0.0999 0.0506 0.0299 0.6195 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2202 0.0105 0.0909 0.0427 0.0319 0.6037 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2268 0.0108 0.0896 0.0421 0.0316 0.5991 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2140 0.0102 0.0896 0.0421 0.0314 0.6126 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2339 0.0111 0.0858 0.0404 0.0306 0.5981 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2380 0.0113 0.0864 0.0407 0.0308 0.5928 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2343 0.0112 0.0878 0.0414 0.0312 0.5941 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2505 0.0119 0.0852 0.0403 0.0307 0.5813 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2374 0.0113 0.0890 0.0419 0.0315 0.5889 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2191 0.0104 0.0936 0.0439 0.0324 0.6006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2180 0.0104 0.0983 0.0460 0.0336 0.5936 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2056 0.0098 0.1029 0.0480 0.0347 0.5990 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2249 0.0107 0.0981 0.0460 0.0337 0.5865 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2265 0.0108 0.0964 0.0452 0.0332 0.5880 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2206 0.0105 0.0945 0.0443 0.0327 0.5974 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2472 0.0118 0.0901 0.0425 0.0320 0.5764 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2152 0.0103 0.0829 0.0390 0.0297 0.6229 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2069 0.0099 0.0852 0.0400 0.0303 0.6278 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2422 0.0115 0.0908 0.0428 0.0322 0.5805 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2073 0.0099 0.0983 0.0460 0.0337 0.6049 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2054 0.0098 0.1010 0.0472 0.0343 0.6024 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1980 0.0094 0.0993 0.0464 0.0338 0.6131 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2008 VMT by Facility Type (INFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 

 1 0.244 0.539 0.211 0.006 

 0.267 0.516 0.212 0.005 

 0.269 0.510 0.216 0.005 

 0.268 0.495 0.233 0.005 

 0.266 0.492 0.237 0.005 

 0.262 0.504 0.229 0.005 

 0.258 0.494 0.242 0.005 

 0.257 0.492 0.247 0.005 

 0.266 0.488 0.242 0.004 

 0.269 0.475 0.252 0.004 

 0.273 0.480 0.243 0.004 

 0.307 0.468 0.221 0.004 

 0.295 0.473 0.228 0.004 

 0.261 0.503 0.233 0.004 

 0.252 0.497 0.247 0.004 

 0.265 0.489 0.243 0.004 

 0.263 0.495 0.237 0.004 

 0.280 0.467 0.249 0.004 

 0.304 0.479 0.212 0.005 

 0.288 0.494 0.212 0.006 

 0.256 0.486 0.253 0.005 

 0.246 0.514 0.235 0.005 

 0.234 0.522 0.239 0.005 

 0.237 0.527 0.231 0.005 

... 

Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel 

transit buses 

 26 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

15 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

2008 MOBILE6.2 Input File (INSCN.IN) 

* Mobile6 file for Dearborn County, IN 

* created 4/9/07, ajr post em62in.06c 

******************* Header Section ************************ 

MOBILE6 INPUT FILE : 

POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO 

PARTICULATES : 

* PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE 

REPORT FILE : in.rpt 

DATABASE OUTPUT : 

WITH FIELDNAMES : 

DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22 

DAILY OUTPUT : 

EMISSIONS TABLE : inemiss.tb1 

RUN DATA 

******************* Run Section *************************** 

VMT BY HOUR : INHVMT.D 

SPEED VMT : INSVMT.D 

VMT BY FACILITY : INFVMT.D 

EXPAND BUS EFS : 

REBUILD EFFECTS : 0.10 

******************* Summer Scenario Section ********************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : Indiana Emissions - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2008 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

SEASON : 1 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 62.0 91.3 

FUEL PROGRAM : 1 

FUEL RVP : 9.0 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

16 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 

******************* Annual Scenario Section ********************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : Indiana Emissions - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2008 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 

FUEL PROGRAM : 1 

FUEL RVP : 9.0 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 

******************* End of Run **************************** 

END OF RUN 

 

2008 MOBILE6.2 Output Report (IN.RPT) 

*************************************************************************** 

* MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * 

* Input file: INSCN.IN (file 1, run 1). * 

*************************************************************************** 

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: INHVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external 

* data file: INSVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: INFVMT.D 

 Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors 

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Indiana Emissions - CY20xx 

* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUILD FRACTION IS 0.10. 

* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Basic Emissiion Rates 

* from the external data file PMNH3BER.D 

* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Sulfur Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMNH3SDR.D 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 

 Calendar Year: 2008 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 62.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 91.3 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi 

 Weathered RVP: 8.6 psi 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

17 

 Reformulated Gas: No 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All 

Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----

- 

 VMT Distribution: 0.3728 0.3705 0.1273 0.0359 0.0004 0.0019 0.0857 0.0055 

1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 1.026 1.055 1.747 1.232 1.634 0.311 0.595 0.504 2.98 

1.115 

 Composite CO : 9.67 11.41 15.71 12.51 15.69 1.215 1.028 2.758 19.79 

10.745 

 Composite NOX : 0.686 0.860 1.238 0.957 2.909 0.776 1.065 9.881 1.23 

1.692 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0002 0.0009 0.0017 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 7.973 0.374 0.726 

 Composite CO : 104.18 3.451 2.765 

 Composite NOX : 7.683 13.272 11.989 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Indiana Emissions - CY20xx 

* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 

 Calendar Year: 2008 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi 

 Weathered RVP: 9.0 psi 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: No 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All 

Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----

- 

 VMT Distribution: 0.3728 0.3705 0.1273 0.0359 0.0004 0.0019 0.0857 0.0055 

1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.876 0.968 1.598 1.129 1.299 0.311 0.595 0.504 2.18 

0.992 

 Composite CO : 12.16 14.76 19.91 16.08 15.68 1.215 1.028 2.758 17.64 

13.440 

 Composite NOX : 0.675 0.901 1.302 1.003 3.017 0.776 1.065 9.881 1.42 

1.716 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

18 

 VMT Mix: 0.0002 0.0009 0.0017 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 6.524 0.374 0.726 

 Composite CO : 98.89 3.451 2.765 

 Composite NOX : 8.570 13.272 11.989 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2015 VMT by Speed Bin (INSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 

1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0135 0.0089 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9777

1 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0096 0.0022 0.0077 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9805

1 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0089 0.0020 0.0072 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9820

1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0043 0.0066 0.0071 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9820

1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0105 0.0069 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9825

1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0112 0.0074 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9814

1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0109 0.0072 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9819

1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0105 0.0069 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9826

1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0101 0.0066 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9833

1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0097 0.0064 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9839

1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0094 0.0062 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9845

1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0078 0.0052 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9870

1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0077 0.0051 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9872

1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0093 0.0061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9846

1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0094 0.0062 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9844

1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0089 0.0059 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9852

1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0100 0.0066 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9834

1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0087 0.0058 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9855

1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0103 0.0068 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9829

1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0114 0.0075 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9810

1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0110 0.0072 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9818

1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0115 0.0076 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9809

1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0117 0.0077 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9805

1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0122 0.0080 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9797

2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1735 0.0086 0.0897 0.0635 0.0801 0.5846 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1832 0.0087 0.0914 0.0654 0.0766 0.5746 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1907 0.0089 0.0937 0.0675 0.0905 0.5487 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2194 0.0090 0.0844 0.0591 0.0774 0.5508 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2266 0.0091 0.0838 0.0568 0.0790 0.5448 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2138 0.0088 0.0832 0.0568 0.0778 0.5596 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2339 0.0090 0.0811 0.0544 0.0775 0.5440 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2386 0.0091 0.0821 0.0549 0.0784 0.5369 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2350 0.0092 0.0831 0.0559 0.0789 0.5380 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2508 0.0093 0.0816 0.0541 0.0789 0.5252 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2385 0.0093 0.0843 0.0567 0.0800 0.5313 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2211 0.0092 0.0875 0.0599 0.0812 0.5411 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2206 0.0095 0.0915 0.0631 0.0841 0.5313 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2080 0.0095 0.0946 0.0660 0.0855 0.5364 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2275 0.0096 0.0917 0.0630 0.0846 0.5237 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2289 0.0095 0.0903 0.0618 0.0837 0.5259 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2216 0.0092 0.0879 0.0602 0.0816 0.5395 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2479 0.0095 0.0856 0.0573 0.0816 0.5181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2131 0.0084 0.0771 0.0520 0.0734 0.5759 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2044 0.0084 0.0783 0.0534 0.0738 0.5818 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2406 0.0094 0.0851 0.0572 0.0809 0.5268 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2075 0.0092 0.0900 0.0624 0.0823 0.5486 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2062 0.0093 0.0924 0.0643 0.0839 0.5439 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1984 0.0090 0.0905 0.0632 0.0821 0.5568 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2015 VMT by Facility Type (INFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 

 1 0.248 0.545 0.201 0.006 

 0.270 0.522 0.202 0.005 

 0.274 0.514 0.208 0.005 

 0.272 0.499 0.225 0.005 

 0.271 0.495 0.230 0.005 

 0.267 0.507 0.221 0.005 

 0.263 0.496 0.236 0.005 

 0.262 0.493 0.240 0.005 

 0.271 0.489 0.236 0.005 

 0.274 0.477 0.245 0.004 

 0.278 0.480 0.237 0.004 

 0.314 0.467 0.215 0.004 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

19 

 0.303 0.472 0.221 0.004 

 0.268 0.503 0.226 0.004 

 0.258 0.497 0.241 0.004 

 0.272 0.488 0.236 0.004 

 0.269 0.497 0.230 0.005 

 0.285 0.468 0.242 0.004 

 0.307 0.483 0.204 0.005 

 0.290 0.500 0.204 0.006 

 0.259 0.491 0.245 0.005 

 0.251 0.518 0.227 0.005 

 0.239 0.525 0.231 0.005 

 0.242 0.530 0.223 0.005 

... 

Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel 

transit buses 

 26 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

2015 MOBILE6.2 Input File (INSCN.IN) 

* Mobile6 file for Dearborn County, IN 

* created 4/9/07, ajr post em62in.06c 

******************* Header Section ************************ 

MOBILE6 INPUT FILE : 

POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO 

PARTICULATES : 

* PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE 

REPORT FILE : in.rpt 

DATABASE OUTPUT : 

WITH FIELDNAMES : 

DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22 

DAILY OUTPUT : 

EMISSIONS TABLE : inemiss.tb1 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

20 

RUN DATA 

******************* Run Section *************************** 

VMT BY HOUR : INHVMT.D 

SPEED VMT : INSVMT.D 

VMT BY FACILITY : INFVMT.D 

EXPAND BUS EFS : 

REBUILD EFFECTS : 0.10 

******************* Summer Scenario Section ********************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : Indiana Emissions - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2015 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

SEASON : 1 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 62.0 91.3 

FUEL PROGRAM : 1 

FUEL RVP : 9.0 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 

******************* Annual Scenario Section ********************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : Indiana Emissions - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2015 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 

FUEL PROGRAM : 1 

FUEL RVP : 9.0 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 

******************* End of Run **************************** 

END OF RUN 

 

2015 MOBILE6.2 Output File (IN.RPT)

*************************************************************************** 

* MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * 

* Input file: INSCN.IN (file 1, run 1). * 

*************************************************************************** 

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: INHVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external 

* data file: INSVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: INFVMT.D 

 Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors 

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Indiana Emissions - CY20xx 

* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

21 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 

 HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUILD FRACTION IS 0.10. 

* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Basic Emissiion Rates 

* from the external data file PMNH3BER.D 

* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Sulfur Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMNH3SDR.D 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 

 Calendar Year: 2015 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 62.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 91.3 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi 

 Weathered RVP: 8.6 psi 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: No 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All 

Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----

- 

 VMT Distribution: 0.3031 0.4218 0.1449 0.0360 0.0003 0.0021 0.0866 0.0053 

1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.544 0.634 1.127 0.760 0.858 0.106 0.324 0.337 2.97 

0.672 

 Composite CO : 7.05 8.04 10.87 8.76 9.92 0.799 0.641 0.941 19.78 

7.645 

 Composite NOX : 0.369 0.475 0.835 0.567 1.086 0.173 0.474 3.747 1.23 

0.804 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 2.719 0.269 0.513 

 Composite CO : 18.47 1.573 1.485 

 Composite NOX : 3.970 6.114 7.085 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Indiana Emissions - CY20xx 

* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

22 

 Calendar Year: 2015 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi 

 Weathered RVP: 9.0 psi 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: No 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All 

Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----

- 

 VMT Distribution: 0.3031 0.4218 0.1449 0.0360 0.0003 0.0021 0.0866 0.0053 

1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.480 0.594 1.045 0.709 0.680 0.106 0.324 0.337 2.17 

0.613 

 Composite CO : 9.61 10.58 13.92 11.44 10.16 0.799 0.641 0.941 17.63 

9.935 

 Composite NOX : 0.358 0.494 0.873 0.591 1.114 0.173 0.474 3.747 1.43 

0.817 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 2.104 0.269 0.513 

 Composite CO : 18.91 1.573 1.485 

 Composite NOX : 4.073 6.114 7.085 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2020 VMT by Speed Bin (INSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 

1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0053 0.0082 0.0086 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9779

1 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0046 0.0050 0.0021 0.0075 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9807

1 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0043 0.0046 0.0020 0.0070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9822

1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0043 0.0066 0.0069 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9822

1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0105 0.0068 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9827

1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0112 0.0072 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9816

1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0109 0.0070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9821

1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0105 0.0067 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9827

1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0101 0.0064 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9835

1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0097 0.0062 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9841

1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0094 0.0060 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9846

1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0078 0.0050 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9872

1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0077 0.0050 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9873

1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0093 0.0059 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9848

1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0094 0.0060 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9846

1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0089 0.0057 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9854

1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0100 0.0064 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9836

1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0087 0.0056 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9857

1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0103 0.0066 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9831

1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0114 0.0073 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9812

1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0109 0.0070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9820

1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0115 0.0074 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9812

1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0117 0.0075 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9808

1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0122 0.0078 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9800

2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1833 0.0076 0.0842 0.0679 0.0777 0.5793 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1934 0.0095 0.0864 0.0688 0.0965 0.5455 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2013 0.0096 0.0869 0.0724 0.1084 0.5214 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2313 0.0078 0.0790 0.0689 0.0870 0.5259 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2388 0.0079 0.0785 0.0605 0.0763 0.5380 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2255 0.0077 0.0780 0.0606 0.0752 0.5531 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2465 0.0078 0.0760 0.0580 0.0748 0.5370 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2514 0.0079 0.0768 0.0585 0.0833 0.5220 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2476 0.0080 0.0778 0.0595 0.0762 0.5310 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2641 0.0081 0.0764 0.0576 0.0760 0.5179 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2513 0.0081 0.0789 0.0604 0.0772 0.5242 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2332 0.0081 0.0820 0.0639 0.0824 0.5305 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2327 0.0083 0.0858 0.0673 0.0813 0.5246 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2195 0.0083 0.0887 0.0705 0.0828 0.5301 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2399 0.0084 0.0859 0.0671 0.0818 0.5169 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2413 0.0083 0.0846 0.0659 0.0809 0.5190 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

23 

2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2336 0.0081 0.0823 0.0642 0.0788 0.5329 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2610 0.0083 0.0801 0.0611 0.0786 0.5110 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2247 0.0073 0.0722 0.0555 0.0709 0.5693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2155 0.0073 0.0734 0.0569 0.0713 0.5755 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2533 0.0081 0.0796 0.0609 0.0779 0.5200 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2189 0.0080 0.0844 0.0666 0.0796 0.5425 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2175 0.0082 0.0866 0.0686 0.0812 0.5378 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2094 0.0080 0.0849 0.0674 0.0795 0.5508 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2020 VMT by Facility Type (INFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 

 1 0.251 0.541 0.202 0.006 

 0.273 0.518 0.204 0.005 

 0.277 0.509 0.209 0.005 

 0.274 0.493 0.227 0.005 

 0.273 0.489 0.233 0.005 

 0.270 0.502 0.224 0.005 

 0.266 0.490 0.239 0.005 

 0.265 0.487 0.244 0.005 

 0.274 0.483 0.239 0.005 

 0.276 0.471 0.249 0.004 

 0.281 0.475 0.240 0.004 

 0.317 0.461 0.218 0.004 

 0.306 0.467 0.224 0.004 

 0.270 0.498 0.227 0.004 

 0.261 0.491 0.243 0.004 

 0.274 0.482 0.239 0.004 

 0.271 0.492 0.233 0.005 

 0.288 0.462 0.245 0.004 

 0.310 0.478 0.207 0.005 

 0.293 0.495 0.206 0.006 

 0.261 0.485 0.248 0.005 

 0.253 0.513 0.229 0.005 

 0.242 0.521 0.233 0.005 

 0.244 0.526 0.225 0.005 

... 

Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel 

transit buses 

 26 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.010 0.949 0.035 0.002 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

24 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

 0.003 0.963 0.030 0.004 

2020 MOBILE6.2 Input File (INSCN.IN) 

* Mobile6 file for Dearborn County, IN 

* created 4/9/07, ajr post em62in.06c 

******************* Header Section ************************ 

MOBILE6 INPUT FILE : 

POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO 

PARTICULATES : 

* PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE 

REPORT FILE : in.rpt 

DATABASE OUTPUT : 

WITH FIELDNAMES : 

DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22 

DAILY OUTPUT : 

EMISSIONS TABLE : inemiss.tb1 

RUN DATA 

******************* Run Section *************************** 

VMT BY HOUR : INHVMT.D 

SPEED VMT : INSVMT.D 

VMT BY FACILITY : INFVMT.D 

EXPAND BUS EFS : 

REBUILD EFFECTS : 0.10 

******************* Summer Scenario Section ********************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : Indiana Emissions - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2020 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

SEASON : 1 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 62.0 91.3 

FUEL PROGRAM : 1 

FUEL RVP : 9.0 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 

******************* Annual Scenario Section ********************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : Indiana Emissions - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2020 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 

FUEL PROGRAM : 1 

FUEL RVP : 9.0 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 

******************* End of Run **************************** 

END OF RUN 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

25 

 

2020 MOBILE6.2 Output File (IN.RPT)

*************************************************************************** 

* MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * 

* Input file: INSCN.IN (file 1, run 1). * 

*************************************************************************** 

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: INHVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external 

* data file: INSVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: INFVMT.D 

 Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors 

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Indiana Emissions - CY20xx 

* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 1. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 

 HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUILD FRACTION IS 0.10. 

* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Basic Emissiion Rates 

* from the external data file PMNH3BER.D 

* Reading Ammonia (NH3) Sulfur Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMNH3SDR.D 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 

 Calendar Year: 2020 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 62.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 91.3 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi 

 Weathered RVP: 8.6 psi 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: No 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.2788 0.4388 0.1507 0.0365 0.0003 0.0022 0.0876 0.0051 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.420 0.513 0.824 0.593 0.611 0.069 0.224 0.300 2.97 0.531 

 Composite CO : 6.40 7.27 9.44 7.82 9.61 0.709 0.514 0.551 19.90 6.896 

 Composite NOX : 0.269 0.372 0.656 0.445 0.583 0.071 0.296 1.931 1.23 0.534 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 1.573 0.256 0.434 

 Composite CO : 17.72 0.734 1.006 

 Composite NOX : 2.132 2.704 4.692 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Indiana Emissions - CY20xx 

* File 1, Run 1, Scenario 2. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

26 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 

 Calendar Year: 2020 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi 

 Weathered RVP: 9.0 psi 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: No 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.2788 0.4388 0.1507 0.0365 0.0003 0.0022 0.0876 0.0051 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.375 0.489 0.788 0.566 0.488 0.069 0.224 0.300 2.18 0.494 

 Composite CO : 8.95 9.49 11.97 10.13 9.83 0.709 0.514 0.551 17.73 8.966 

 Composite NOX : 0.257 0.383 0.681 0.459 0.599 0.071 0.296 1.931 1.43 0.541 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 1.258 0.256 0.434 

 Composite CO : 18.14 0.734 1.006 

 Composite NOX : 2.187 2.704 4.692 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

27 

APPENDIX B

MOBILE6.2 Input/Output Files for Kentucky Portion of 

Nonattainment Area 

 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

28 

VMT By Hour (KYHVMT.D), all analysis years

VMT BY HOUR 

 0.0478 0.0719 0.0796 0.0666 0.0563 0.0532 

 0.0545 0.0543 0.0515 0.0523 0.0560 0.0565 

 0.0504 0.0377 0.0266 0.0209 0.0197 0.0171 

 0.0142 0.0156 0.0188 0.0224 0.0251 0.0310 

2005 VMT by Speed Bin (KYSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 

1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0052 0.0000 0.0011 0.0222 0.0279 0.0462 0.0454 0.0566 0.1746 0.6208

1 2 0.0006 0.0040 0.0017 0.0039 0.0000 0.0010 0.0055 0.0151 0.0228 0.0433 0.0401 0.0807 0.1605 0.6206

1 3 0.0048 0.0000 0.0015 0.0039 0.0006 0.0027 0.0078 0.0146 0.0224 0.0811 0.0687 0.1074 0.0805 0.6041

1 4 0.0054 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0019 0.0101 0.0176 0.0249 0.0493 0.0371 0.0832 0.1618 0.6081

1 5 0.0058 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0107 0.0152 0.0282 0.0469 0.0484 0.0585 0.1751 0.6105

1 6 0.0060 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0071 0.0196 0.0291 0.0461 0.0510 0.0589 0.1744 0.6070

1 7 0.0064 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0008 0.0000 0.0122 0.0174 0.0295 0.0515 0.0479 0.0597 0.1736 0.6009

1 8 0.0064 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0008 0.0000 0.0122 0.0173 0.0294 0.0535 0.0447 0.0600 0.1749 0.6010

1 9 0.0060 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0095 0.0172 0.0290 0.0450 0.0500 0.0594 0.1764 0.6067

1 10 0.0059 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0092 0.0167 0.0282 0.0443 0.0487 0.0593 0.1778 0.6092

1 11 0.0057 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0000 0.0108 0.0153 0.0261 0.0482 0.0424 0.0615 0.1858 0.6036

1 12 0.0054 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0000 0.0102 0.0145 0.0246 0.0496 0.0400 0.0602 0.1852 0.6095

1 13 0.0000 0.0052 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0047 0.0188 0.0249 0.0397 0.0478 0.0578 0.1796 0.6214

1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0053 0.0006 0.0229 0.0263 0.0379 0.0502 0.0584 0.1803 0.6180

1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0247 0.0333 0.0364 0.0525 0.0594 0.1812 0.6127

1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0237 0.0319 0.0361 0.0503 0.0591 0.1826 0.6163

1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0214 0.0289 0.0346 0.0459 0.0587 0.1870 0.6234

1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0190 0.0255 0.0331 0.0405 0.0584 0.1918 0.6318

1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0195 0.0261 0.0357 0.0421 0.0575 0.1875 0.6315

1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0205 0.0276 0.0375 0.0448 0.0573 0.1839 0.6285

1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0214 0.0288 0.0379 0.0465 0.0575 0.1824 0.6256

1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0242 0.0326 0.0393 0.0525 0.0580 0.1775 0.6159

1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0254 0.0342 0.0391 0.0549 0.0585 0.1764 0.6114

1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0323 0.0295 0.0398 0.0571 0.0586 0.1744 0.6083

2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1120 0.1106 0.1128 0.2411 0.1801 0.2150 0.0283 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1200 0.1265 0.1351 0.2175 0.1662 0.2073 0.0275 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 3 0.0000 0.0023 0.0021 0.1299 0.1238 0.1504 0.2073 0.1546 0.2008 0.0289 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0026 0.1266 0.1284 0.1293 0.2077 0.1753 0.2002 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0024 0.1170 0.1230 0.1168 0.2200 0.1815 0.2085 0.0307 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1136 0.1149 0.1132 0.2227 0.1869 0.2170 0.0316 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0025 0.1155 0.1226 0.1149 0.2160 0.1874 0.2090 0.0319 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0028 0.1204 0.1198 0.1134 0.2163 0.1907 0.2046 0.0320 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1167 0.1183 0.1101 0.2230 0.1888 0.2113 0.0318 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1221 0.1252 0.1118 0.2182 0.1850 0.2064 0.0313 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0028 0.1163 0.1256 0.1145 0.2168 0.1858 0.2067 0.0316 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0029 0.1098 0.1164 0.1141 0.2211 0.1909 0.2125 0.0323 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1129 0.1080 0.1087 0.2337 0.1894 0.2161 0.0312 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1106 0.1085 0.1006 0.2426 0.1932 0.2143 0.0302 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1139 0.1111 0.0913 0.2455 0.1952 0.2124 0.0306 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1129 0.1100 0.0892 0.2449 0.1977 0.2141 0.0311 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1144 0.1115 0.0906 0.2447 0.1945 0.2136 0.0306 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1228 0.1189 0.0878 0.2444 0.1900 0.2061 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1120 0.1087 0.0836 0.2418 0.2008 0.2211 0.0320 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1140 0.1109 0.0881 0.2425 0.1947 0.2188 0.0310 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1328 0.1288 0.0955 0.2455 0.1736 0.1963 0.0275 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1174 0.1148 0.0985 0.2462 0.1846 0.2096 0.0290 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1165 0.1142 0.1001 0.2468 0.1843 0.2093 0.0289 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1123 0.1101 0.1004 0.2437 0.1893 0.2145 0.0297 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2005 VMT by Facility (KYFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 

 1 0.467 0.332 0.154 0.047 

 0.490 0.313 0.154 0.044 

 0.498 0.313 0.144 0.045 

 0.474 0.328 0.149 0.048 

 0.458 0.342 0.150 0.051 

 0.455 0.349 0.144 0.052 

 0.441 0.357 0.148 0.054 

 0.443 0.356 0.147 0.054 

 0.457 0.346 0.144 0.052 

 0.461 0.340 0.148 0.051 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

29 

 0.474 0.334 0.141 0.050 

 0.497 0.325 0.129 0.049 

 0.497 0.321 0.134 0.047 

 0.482 0.328 0.142 0.048 

 0.471 0.335 0.145 0.049 

 0.486 0.327 0.139 0.048 

 0.510 0.309 0.135 0.046 

 0.539 0.286 0.133 0.042 

 0.547 0.290 0.119 0.044 

 0.525 0.301 0.129 0.045 

 0.482 0.310 0.164 0.043 

 0.462 0.334 0.156 0.048 

 0.448 0.343 0.160 0.049 

 0.444 0.350 0.155 0.051 

... 

Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel 

transit buses 

 26 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 

 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 

 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 

 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 

 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

2005 MOBILE6.2 Input File (KYSCN.IN)

* Mobile6 file for Boone, Campbell and Kenton counties 

* pre 2006 analysis years, includes annual scenario 

* created 10/12/05,AJR 

 

************************ Header Section ***************** 

MOBILE6 INPUT FILE : 

POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO 

PARTICULATES : 

* PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE 

REPORT FILE : KY.RPT 

DATABASE OUTPUT : 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

30 

WITH FIELDNAMES : 

DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 

DAILY OUTPUT : 

EMISSIONS TABLE : kyemiss.tb1 

RUN DATA 

************************ Run Section ******************* 

> post 1999, KY counties of Boone, Campbell and Kenton 

*REG DIST : KYREG.D 

VMT BY HOUR : KYHVMT.D 

SPEED VMT : KYSVMT.D 

VMT BY FACILITY : KYFVMT.D 

EXPRESS HC AS VOC : 

I/M PROGRAM : 1 1999 2005 2 T/O IDLE 

I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1968 2005 

I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 22211111 1 

I/M STRINGENCY : 1 20.0 

I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 99.0 

I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 18.0 10.0 

I/M PROGRAM : 2 1999 2005 2 T/O FP & GC 

I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1981 2005 

I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 

I/M STRINGENCY : 2 20.0 

I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 99.0 

I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 18.0 10.0 

ANTI-TAMP PROGR : 

99 75 50 22222 22211111 1 12 099. 22222222 

STAGE II REFUELING : 

99 2 86. 86. 

EXPAND BUS EFS : 

********************* Summer Scenario Section **************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2005 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

FUEL RVP : 7.8 

FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 66.0 89.0 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 323 

********************* Annual Scenario Section ***************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2005 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

FUEL RVP : 9.0 

FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 324 

*********************************** END OF RUN ***************** 

END OF RUN 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

31 

2005 MOBILE6.2 Output Report (KY.RPT) 

*************************************************************************** 

* MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * 

* Input file: KYSCN.IN (file 2, run 1). * 

*************************************************************************** 

* post 1999, KY counties of Boone, Campbell and Kenton 

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: KYHVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external 

* data file: KYSVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: KYFVMT.D 

 Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors 

 M601 Comment: 

 User has enabled STAGE II REFUELING.

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx 

* File 2, Run 1, Scenario 1. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

*** I/M credits for Tech1&2 vehicles were read from the following external 

 data file: TECH12.D 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 Calendar Year: 2005 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 66.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 89.0 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 90. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: Yes 

 Evap I/M Program: Yes 

 ATP Program: Yes 

 Reformulated Gas: Yes 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All 

Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----

- 

 VMT Distribution: 0.4158 0.3387 0.1165 0.0360 0.0006 0.0019 0.0849 0.0057 

1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.871 0.901 1.428 1.035 1.244 0.575 0.796 0.536 2.19 

0.938 

 Composite CO : 10.18 11.84 15.33 12.73 14.37 1.611 1.408 3.205 15.87 

10.912 

 Composite NOX : 0.920 1.099 1.415 1.180 4.396 1.537 1.599 13.396 1.31 

2.226 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0009 0.0016 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 6.036 0.578 0.727 

 Composite CO : 98.01 4.483 2.790 

 Composite NOX : 8.754 16.461 14.355 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx 

* File 2, Run 1, Scenario 2. 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

32 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 Calendar Year: 2005 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 90. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: Yes 

 Evap I/M Program: Yes 

 ATP Program: Yes 

 Reformulated Gas: Yes 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All 

Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----

- 

 VMT Distribution: 0.4158 0.3387 0.1165 0.0360 0.0006 0.0019 0.0849 0.0057 

1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.864 0.941 1.520 1.089 1.154 0.575 0.796 0.536 2.08 

0.956 

 Composite CO : 13.44 16.12 19.94 17.10 14.60 1.611 1.408 3.205 14.58 

14.257 

 Composite NOX : 0.931 1.166 1.506 1.253 4.517 1.537 1.599 13.396 1.52 

2.269 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0009 0.0016 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 5.574 0.578 0.727 

 Composite CO : 90.66 4.483 2.790 

 Composite NOX : 9.196 16.461 14.355 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2008 VMT by Speed bin (KYSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 

1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0014 0.0034 0.0213 0.0225 0.0599 0.0156 0.0469 0.0285 0.8004

1 2 0.0000 0.0010 0.0033 0.0003 0.0004 0.0027 0.0040 0.0175 0.0153 0.0639 0.0092 0.0770 0.0609 0.7445

1 3 0.0000 0.0036 0.0005 0.0011 0.0020 0.0033 0.0057 0.0347 0.0215 0.0679 0.0706 0.0701 0.0428 0.6760

1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0014 0.0018 0.0055 0.0078 0.0148 0.0197 0.0670 0.0053 0.0765 0.0620 0.7384

1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0037 0.0064 0.0192 0.0222 0.0702 0.0066 0.0462 0.0288 0.7960

1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0035 0.0060 0.0208 0.0231 0.0677 0.0099 0.0460 0.0288 0.7936

1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0012 0.0038 0.0085 0.0180 0.0244 0.0727 0.0063 0.0456 0.0288 0.7900

1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0011 0.0038 0.0089 0.0175 0.0243 0.0720 0.0063 0.0455 0.0290 0.7910

1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0038 0.0057 0.0199 0.0202 0.0729 0.0068 0.0458 0.0291 0.7951

1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0037 0.0053 0.0197 0.0196 0.0719 0.0066 0.0458 0.0293 0.7974

1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0010 0.0035 0.0071 0.0166 0.0213 0.0687 0.0055 0.0519 0.0526 0.7711

1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0010 0.0034 0.0067 0.0158 0.0194 0.0695 0.0052 0.0766 0.0465 0.7553

1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0020 0.0044 0.0190 0.0181 0.0648 0.0108 0.0465 0.0491 0.7853

1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0015 0.0006 0.0232 0.0190 0.0575 0.0188 0.0462 0.0295 0.8037

1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0015 0.0000 0.0249 0.0201 0.0570 0.0195 0.0457 0.0298 0.8016

1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0015 0.0000 0.0240 0.0192 0.0564 0.0186 0.0458 0.0299 0.8045

1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0015 0.0000 0.0221 0.0173 0.0546 0.0171 0.0459 0.0305 0.8110

1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0015 0.0000 0.0200 0.0152 0.0527 0.0149 0.0460 0.0311 0.8186

1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0015 0.0000 0.0204 0.0156 0.0545 0.0159 0.0464 0.0304 0.8153

1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0015 0.0000 0.0213 0.0165 0.0560 0.0172 0.0465 0.0298 0.8111

1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0015 0.0000 0.0220 0.0172 0.0567 0.0177 0.0465 0.0297 0.8087

1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0014 0.0000 0.0244 0.0197 0.0586 0.0201 0.0463 0.0291 0.8003
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

33 

1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0014 0.0000 0.0255 0.0207 0.0590 0.0210 0.0461 0.0290 0.7973

1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0014 0.0000 0.0263 0.0215 0.0598 0.0219 0.0461 0.0287 0.7942

2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1888 0.0882 0.0726 0.2034 0.1932 0.2201 0.0338 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1976 0.1003 0.0869 0.1939 0.1737 0.2146 0.0330 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 3 0.0000 0.0001 0.0007 0.2011 0.1046 0.0965 0.1906 0.1654 0.2085 0.0325 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 4 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002 0.2043 0.1007 0.0869 0.1903 0.1806 0.2031 0.0338 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.1975 0.0969 0.0737 0.1908 0.1986 0.2084 0.0341 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.1896 0.0890 0.0733 0.1934 0.2034 0.2162 0.0350 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 7 0.0000 0.0001 0.0001 0.1949 0.0958 0.0755 0.1919 0.1997 0.2074 0.0349 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 8 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002 0.1948 0.0963 0.0766 0.1916 0.1989 0.2067 0.0347 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.1943 0.0916 0.0719 0.1920 0.2034 0.2121 0.0346 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.2017 0.0989 0.0691 0.1892 0.2000 0.2070 0.0340 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 11 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.1963 0.0965 0.0760 0.1940 0.1974 0.2055 0.0342 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 12 0.0000 0.0001 0.0003 0.1862 0.0881 0.0800 0.1976 0.2013 0.2116 0.0348 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1893 0.0886 0.0691 0.2003 0.2015 0.2174 0.0338 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1891 0.0883 0.0638 0.2032 0.2055 0.2168 0.0333 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1940 0.0906 0.0600 0.2008 0.2076 0.2137 0.0333 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1927 0.0900 0.0588 0.2001 0.2097 0.2151 0.0337 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1942 0.0907 0.0593 0.2001 0.2068 0.2151 0.0338 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2053 0.0958 0.0570 0.1973 0.2042 0.2074 0.0330 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1904 0.0889 0.0549 0.1973 0.2110 0.2218 0.0358 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1924 0.0898 0.0575 0.1986 0.2058 0.2204 0.0354 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2170 0.1013 0.0608 0.1982 0.1914 0.1994 0.0318 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1973 0.0921 0.0639 0.2025 0.1985 0.2126 0.0331 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1963 0.0917 0.0650 0.2034 0.1983 0.2125 0.0328 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1907 0.0890 0.0641 0.2035 0.2017 0.2173 0.0337 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2008 VMT by Facility Type (KYFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 

 1 0.462 0.337 0.170 0.030 

 0.482 0.321 0.170 0.028 

 0.494 0.317 0.161 0.029 

 0.469 0.330 0.170 0.031 

 0.454 0.341 0.173 0.032 

 0.455 0.345 0.166 0.034 

 0.440 0.353 0.172 0.035 

 0.443 0.351 0.172 0.034 

 0.457 0.342 0.168 0.033 

 0.458 0.337 0.173 0.032 

 0.473 0.331 0.164 0.032 

 0.499 0.320 0.149 0.032 

 0.498 0.318 0.154 0.030 

 0.481 0.327 0.161 0.030 

 0.469 0.333 0.167 0.031 

 0.485 0.324 0.160 0.031 

 0.508 0.308 0.155 0.029 

 0.533 0.287 0.153 0.027 

 0.546 0.288 0.138 0.028 

 0.521 0.301 0.148 0.029 

 0.469 0.318 0.186 0.027 

 0.457 0.337 0.176 0.030 

 0.443 0.346 0.180 0.031 

 0.442 0.351 0.175 0.032 

... 

Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel 

transit buses 

 26 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 

 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 

 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

34 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 

 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 

 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 

2008 MOBILE6.2 Input File (KYSCN.IN) 

* Mobile6 file for Boone, Campbell and Kenton counties 

* post 2005 analysis years, includes annual scenario 

* created 4/9/07,AJR, post 2005 

************************ Header Section ***************** 

MOBILE6 INPUT FILE : 

POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO 

PARTICULATES : 

* PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE 

REPORT FILE : KY.RPT 

DATABASE OUTPUT : 

WITH FIELDNAMES : 

DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22 

DAILY OUTPUT : 

EMISSIONS TABLE : kyemiss.tb1 

RUN DATA 

************************ Run Section ******************* 

VMT BY HOUR : KYHVMT.D 

SPEED VMT : KYSVMT.D 

VMT BY FACILITY : KYFVMT.D 

STAGE II REFUELING : 

99 2 86. 86. 

EXPAND BUS EFS : 

REBUILD EFFECTS : 0.30 

********************* Summer Scenario Section **************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2008 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

FUEL RVP : 7.8 

FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 61.0 95.0 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

35 

********************* Annual Scenario Section ***************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2008 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

FUEL RVP : 9.0 

FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 

*********************************** END OF RUN ***************** 

END OF RUN 

2008 MOBILE6.2 Output Report (KY.RPT) 

*************************************************************************** 

* MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * 

* Input file: KYSCN.IN (file 2, run 1). * 

*************************************************************************** 

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: KYHVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external 

* data file: KYSVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: KYFVMT.D 

 Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors 

 M601 Comment: 

 User has enabled STAGE II REFUELING.

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx 

* File 2, Run 1, Scenario 1. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUILD FRACTION IS 0.30. 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 

 Calendar Year: 2008 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 61.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 95.0 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: Yes 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.3728 0.3705 0.1273 0.0359 0.0004 0.0019 0.0857 0.0055 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.765 0.795 1.288 0.921 1.044 0.291 0.556 0.456 2.32 0.834 

 Composite CO : 9.18 10.54 14.15 11.47 12.43 1.153 0.977 2.537 18.01 9.895 

 Composite NOX : 0.695 0.874 1.254 0.971 3.039 0.825 1.132 10.682 1.30 1.776 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0002 0.0009 0.0017 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 5.712 0.383 0.654 

 Composite CO : 87.14 3.588 2.539 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

36 

 Composite NOX : 7.927 14.073 12.793 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx 

* File 2, Run 1, Scenario 2. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 

 Calendar Year: 2008 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: Yes 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.3728 0.3705 0.1273 0.0359 0.0004 0.0019 0.0857 0.0055 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.734 0.799 1.302 0.928 0.923 0.291 0.556 0.456 2.11 0.821 

 Composite CO : 11.88 14.19 18.70 15.34 12.85 1.153 0.977 2.537 15.32 12.832 

 Composite NOX : 0.687 0.914 1.318 1.017 3.135 0.825 1.132 10.682 1.53 1.801 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0002 0.0009 0.0017 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 4.970 0.383 0.654 

 Composite CO : 80.26 3.588 2.539 

 Composite NOX : 8.913 14.073 12.793 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

2015 VMT by Speed Bin (KYSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 

1 1 0.0000 0.0005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 0.0181 0.0280 0.0690 0.0389 0.0448 0.1520 0.6475

1 2 0.0005 0.0000 0.0033 0.0000 0.0006 0.0005 0.0068 0.0259 0.0336 0.0733 0.0566 0.0927 0.0599 0.6463

1 3 0.0005 0.0002 0.0083 0.0247 0.0007 0.0070 0.0320 0.0356 0.0194 0.1146 0.0389 0.0565 0.0235 0.6380

1 4 0.0006 0.0000 0.0002 0.0007 0.0011 0.0014 0.0159 0.0325 0.0247 0.0783 0.0606 0.0898 0.0605 0.6336

1 5 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0008 0.0007 0.0081 0.0155 0.0232 0.0821 0.0384 0.0687 0.1246 0.6369

1 6 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0008 0.0004 0.0089 0.0154 0.0247 0.0833 0.0347 0.0735 0.1242 0.6334

1 7 0.0007 0.0000 0.0000 0.0012 0.0000 0.0022 0.0088 0.0166 0.0243 0.0877 0.0340 0.0735 0.1237 0.6272

1 8 0.0007 0.0000 0.0003 0.0009 0.0004 0.0024 0.0082 0.0169 0.0239 0.0869 0.0335 0.0740 0.1246 0.6273

1 9 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0011 0.0002 0.0087 0.0155 0.0246 0.0815 0.0346 0.0743 0.1257 0.6332

1 10 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0011 0.0007 0.0079 0.0150 0.0239 0.0799 0.0385 0.0698 0.1267 0.6357

1 11 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 0.0000 0.0020 0.0078 0.0147 0.0264 0.1042 0.0300 0.0906 0.0837 0.6390

1 12 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 0.0000 0.0018 0.0074 0.0187 0.0438 0.0803 0.0565 0.0693 0.0857 0.6349

1 13 0.0005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0055 0.0138 0.0230 0.0681 0.0665 0.0507 0.1231 0.6480

1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0005 0.0187 0.0246 0.0656 0.0416 0.0463 0.1572 0.6448

1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0202 0.0259 0.0654 0.0435 0.0468 0.1581 0.6395

1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0194 0.0254 0.0640 0.0417 0.0470 0.1594 0.6432

1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0176 0.0230 0.0599 0.0381 0.0475 0.1633 0.6507

1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0155 0.0204 0.0556 0.0336 0.0481 0.1675 0.6594

1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0159 0.0208 0.0587 0.0349 0.0471 0.1636 0.6589

1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0168 0.0220 0.0616 0.0371 0.0465 0.1604 0.6557

1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0175 0.0229 0.0631 0.0385 0.0463 0.1590 0.6527

1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0198 0.0259 0.0677 0.0434 0.0458 0.1547 0.6426

1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0208 0.0272 0.0689 0.0455 0.0458 0.1538 0.6380

1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0000 0.0216 0.0276 0.0706 0.0472 0.0455 0.1520 0.6348

2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3682 0.0762 0.0569 0.1521 0.1330 0.1717 0.0418 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3865 0.0820 0.0769 0.1311 0.1185 0.1651 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 3 0.0000 0.0001 0.0053 0.3753 0.0895 0.0806 0.1377 0.1062 0.1641 0.0410 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0014 0.3846 0.0847 0.0696 0.1381 0.1146 0.1659 0.0409 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.3783 0.0803 0.0611 0.1400 0.1283 0.1703 0.0416 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3632 0.0759 0.0597 0.1433 0.1355 0.1788 0.0436 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

37 

2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3704 0.0796 0.0613 0.1406 0.1300 0.1751 0.0430 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3721 0.0789 0.0610 0.1428 0.1273 0.1752 0.0427 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3700 0.0774 0.0586 0.1422 0.1345 0.1748 0.0425 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.3838 0.0804 0.0577 0.1380 0.1302 0.1687 0.0411 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3743 0.0793 0.0635 0.1393 0.1283 0.1733 0.0419 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3559 0.0752 0.0640 0.1458 0.1339 0.1815 0.0437 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3625 0.0738 0.0556 0.1463 0.1418 0.1781 0.0419 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3637 0.0745 0.0503 0.1517 0.1426 0.1760 0.0411 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3709 0.0754 0.0458 0.1510 0.1427 0.1736 0.0407 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3682 0.0747 0.0449 0.1505 0.1448 0.1754 0.0413 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3720 0.0755 0.0455 0.1503 0.1421 0.1733 0.0414 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3905 0.0786 0.0439 0.1473 0.1360 0.1644 0.0392 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3655 0.0738 0.0424 0.1480 0.1473 0.1783 0.0446 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3706 0.0751 0.0444 0.1488 0.1424 0.1748 0.0439 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4133 0.0833 0.0469 0.1470 0.1218 0.1514 0.0364 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3796 0.0775 0.0489 0.1520 0.1343 0.1677 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3778 0.0774 0.0496 0.1529 0.1344 0.1682 0.0397 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3678 0.0754 0.0490 0.1532 0.1393 0.1738 0.0415 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2015 VMT by Facility Type (KYFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 

 1 0.376 0.309 0.285 0.030 

 0.395 0.292 0.286 0.028 

 0.404 0.295 0.272 0.029 

 0.379 0.304 0.286 0.030 

 0.364 0.316 0.288 0.032 

 0.365 0.325 0.277 0.033 

 0.350 0.329 0.287 0.034 

 0.352 0.329 0.286 0.034 

 0.365 0.321 0.281 0.033 

 0.365 0.313 0.290 0.032 

 0.380 0.312 0.276 0.032 

 0.406 0.309 0.253 0.032 

 0.405 0.304 0.260 0.031 

 0.390 0.309 0.271 0.031 

 0.377 0.312 0.279 0.031 

 0.393 0.307 0.270 0.031 

 0.415 0.293 0.263 0.029 

 0.438 0.271 0.264 0.027 

 0.453 0.279 0.239 0.029 

 0.430 0.287 0.254 0.029 

 0.378 0.283 0.313 0.027 

 0.368 0.309 0.293 0.030 

 0.355 0.316 0.299 0.031 

 0.354 0.324 0.290 0.032 

... 

Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel 

transit buses 

 26 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 

 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 

 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 

 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 

 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

38 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

2015 MOBILE6.2 Input File (KYSCN.IN) 

* Mobile6 file for Boone, Campbell and Kenton counties 

* post 2005 analysis years, includes annual scenario 

* created 4/9/07,AJR, post 2005 

************************ Header Section ***************** 

MOBILE6 INPUT FILE : 

POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO 

PARTICULATES : 

* PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE 

REPORT FILE : KY.RPT 

DATABASE OUTPUT : 

WITH FIELDNAMES : 

DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22 

DAILY OUTPUT : 

EMISSIONS TABLE : kyemiss.tb1 

RUN DATA 

************************ Run Section ******************* 

VMT BY HOUR : KYHVMT.D 

SPEED VMT : KYSVMT.D 

VMT BY FACILITY : KYFVMT.D 

STAGE II REFUELING : 

99 2 86. 86. 

EXPAND BUS EFS : 

REBUILD EFFECTS : 0.30 

********************* Summer Scenario Section **************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2015 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

FUEL RVP : 7.8 

FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 61.0 95.0 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 

********************* Annual Scenario Section ***************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2015 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

FUEL RVP : 9.0 

FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

39 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 

*********************************** END OF RUN ***************** 

END OF RUN 

2015 MOBILE6.2 Output File (KY.RPT)

*************************************************************************** 

* MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * 

* Input file: KYSCN.IN (file 2, run 1). * 

*************************************************************************** 

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: KYHVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external 

* data file: KYSVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: KYFVMT.D 

 Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors 

 M601 Comment: 

 User has enabled STAGE II REFUELING.

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx 

* File 2, Run 1, Scenario 1. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 

 HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUILD FRACTION IS 0.30. 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 

 Calendar Year: 2015 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 61.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 95.0 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: Yes 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.3031 0.4218 0.1449 0.0360 0.0003 0.0021 0.0866 0.0053 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.446 0.530 0.927 0.632 0.616 0.110 0.337 0.357 2.42 0.560 

 Composite CO : 6.52 7.37 9.89 8.01 9.07 0.838 0.671 1.014 18.78 7.031 

 Composite NOX : 0.377 0.481 0.845 0.574 1.082 0.177 0.486 3.843 1.21 0.819 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 1.831 0.306 0.543 

 Composite CO : 16.29 1.871 1.597 

 Composite NOX : 3.958 6.649 7.289 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx 

* File 2, Run 1, Scenario 2. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

40 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 

 Calendar Year: 2015 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: Yes 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.3031 0.4218 0.1449 0.0360 0.0003 0.0021 0.0866 0.0053 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.437 0.532 0.929 0.634 0.558 0.110 0.337 0.357 2.20 0.555 

 Composite CO : 9.30 10.17 13.27 10.96 9.91 0.838 0.671 1.014 15.96 9.561 

 Composite NOX : 0.362 0.499 0.880 0.596 1.102 0.177 0.486 3.843 1.42 0.829 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 1.643 0.306 0.543 

 Composite CO : 17.81 1.871 1.597 

 Composite NOX : 4.030 6.649 7.289 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

2020 VMT by Speed Bin (KYSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 

1 1 0.0002 0.0004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0017 0.0173 0.0276 0.0712 0.0390 0.0446 0.1441 0.6540

1 2 0.0005 0.0000 0.0033 0.0000 0.0009 0.0013 0.0204 0.0242 0.0204 0.0976 0.0425 0.0996 0.0358 0.6535

1 3 0.0005 0.0004 0.0307 0.0019 0.0067 0.0263 0.0190 0.0234 0.0552 0.0868 0.0338 0.0475 0.0480 0.6197

1 4 0.0006 0.0002 0.0013 0.0002 0.0022 0.0062 0.0205 0.0243 0.0216 0.1068 0.0491 0.0905 0.0361 0.6405

1 5 0.0007 0.0000 0.0003 0.0008 0.0008 0.0020 0.0074 0.0147 0.0247 0.0845 0.0450 0.0623 0.1139 0.6431

1 6 0.0007 0.0000 0.0003 0.0002 0.0014 0.0011 0.0083 0.0145 0.0239 0.0883 0.0323 0.0716 0.1178 0.6395

1 7 0.0007 0.0003 0.0003 0.0013 0.0011 0.0027 0.0098 0.0134 0.0248 0.0901 0.0333 0.0717 0.1174 0.6332

1 8 0.0007 0.0003 0.0003 0.0014 0.0015 0.0029 0.0100 0.0135 0.0236 0.0900 0.0459 0.0629 0.1139 0.6333

1 9 0.0007 0.0000 0.0003 0.0002 0.0014 0.0015 0.0079 0.0148 0.0235 0.0865 0.0367 0.0679 0.1193 0.6393

1 10 0.0007 0.0000 0.0003 0.0002 0.0013 0.0020 0.0072 0.0144 0.0228 0.0848 0.0453 0.0634 0.1158 0.6419

1 11 0.0006 0.0002 0.0002 0.0013 0.0008 0.0024 0.0084 0.0121 0.0360 0.0956 0.0344 0.0905 0.0825 0.6348

1 12 0.0006 0.0002 0.0002 0.0012 0.0007 0.0022 0.0126 0.0334 0.0226 0.0850 0.0500 0.1131 0.0362 0.6417

1 13 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0000 0.0016 0.0057 0.0141 0.0205 0.0898 0.0457 0.0723 0.0949 0.6545

1 14 0.0000 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0009 0.0181 0.0244 0.0679 0.0416 0.0461 0.1492 0.6512

1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0198 0.0259 0.0679 0.0435 0.0466 0.1500 0.6457

1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0196 0.0248 0.0664 0.0417 0.0467 0.1513 0.6495

1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0172 0.0231 0.0621 0.0381 0.0473 0.1550 0.6573

1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0152 0.0204 0.0576 0.0336 0.0479 0.1592 0.6662

1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0157 0.0209 0.0607 0.0349 0.0469 0.1554 0.6657

1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0165 0.0220 0.0636 0.0370 0.0462 0.1522 0.6624

1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0172 0.0230 0.0652 0.0384 0.0461 0.1509 0.6593

1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0197 0.0258 0.0700 0.0433 0.0455 0.1466 0.6490

1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0209 0.0266 0.0713 0.0454 0.0456 0.1458 0.6443

1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0212 0.0276 0.0731 0.0471 0.0453 0.1441 0.6410

2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4825 0.0614 0.0493 0.1235 0.1068 0.1415 0.0350 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0032 0.4979 0.0675 0.0631 0.1076 0.0929 0.1344 0.0333 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 3 0.0000 0.0021 0.0032 0.4922 0.0724 0.0735 0.1081 0.0812 0.1329 0.0344 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0027 0.4998 0.0712 0.0587 0.1109 0.0913 0.1311 0.0342 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4950 0.0651 0.0516 0.1137 0.1001 0.1396 0.0349 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.4783 0.0628 0.0494 0.1182 0.1080 0.1465 0.0369 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4878 0.0651 0.0522 0.1172 0.1003 0.1412 0.0362 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 8 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.4881 0.0651 0.0521 0.1195 0.0978 0.1413 0.0360 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.4864 0.0639 0.0482 0.1164 0.1056 0.1436 0.0359 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.5004 0.0657 0.0489 0.1114 0.1014 0.1378 0.0344 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4920 0.0645 0.0530 0.1164 0.0992 0.1396 0.0353 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4717 0.0633 0.0524 0.1233 0.1047 0.1475 0.0371 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4774 0.0607 0.0493 0.1191 0.1118 0.1463 0.0354 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

41 

2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4784 0.0601 0.0420 0.1250 0.1147 0.1451 0.0347 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4864 0.0606 0.0378 0.1240 0.1143 0.1426 0.0343 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4837 0.0601 0.0371 0.1238 0.1161 0.1442 0.0349 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4876 0.0606 0.0375 0.1234 0.1138 0.1423 0.0348 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.5074 0.0625 0.0359 0.1198 0.1079 0.1338 0.0327 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4810 0.0594 0.0351 0.1216 0.1183 0.1469 0.0376 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4862 0.0603 0.0367 0.1222 0.1141 0.1438 0.0369 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.5307 0.0654 0.0378 0.1184 0.0956 0.1220 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4953 0.0620 0.0402 0.1246 0.1071 0.1373 0.0334 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4933 0.0619 0.0409 0.1255 0.1073 0.1379 0.0332 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4827 0.0607 0.0405 0.1263 0.1117 0.1431 0.0349 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2020 VMT by Facility Type (KYFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 

 1 0.331 0.277 0.366 0.026 

 0.347 0.261 0.368 0.024 

 0.357 0.265 0.353 0.025 

 0.332 0.271 0.370 0.026 

 0.319 0.281 0.373 0.027 

 0.322 0.290 0.360 0.029 

 0.307 0.293 0.371 0.029 

 0.308 0.292 0.370 0.029 

 0.321 0.286 0.364 0.028 

 0.320 0.278 0.375 0.027 

 0.335 0.279 0.359 0.028 

 0.361 0.279 0.332 0.028 

 0.359 0.274 0.340 0.027 

 0.344 0.278 0.352 0.027 

 0.332 0.279 0.362 0.027 

 0.347 0.275 0.351 0.027 

 0.367 0.264 0.343 0.026 

 0.387 0.244 0.346 0.023 

 0.405 0.253 0.316 0.026 

 0.382 0.259 0.334 0.026 

 0.327 0.249 0.401 0.023 

 0.322 0.275 0.377 0.026 

 0.310 0.281 0.383 0.026 

 0.310 0.288 0.374 0.028 

... 

Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel 

transit buses 

 2 0.331 0.277 0.366 0.026 

 0.347 0.261 0.368 0.024 

 0.357 0.265 0.353 0.025 

 0.332 0.271 0.370 0.026 

 0.319 0.281 0.373 0.027 

 0.322 0.290 0.360 0.029 

 0.307 0.293 0.371 0.029 

 0.308 0.292 0.370 0.029 

 0.321 0.286 0.364 0.028 

 0.320 0.278 0.375 0.027 

 0.335 0.279 0.359 0.028 

 0.361 0.279 0.332 0.028 

 0.359 0.274 0.340 0.027 

 0.344 0.278 0.352 0.027 

 0.332 0.279 0.362 0.027 

 0.347 0.275 0.351 0.027 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

42 

 0.367 0.264 0.343 0.026 

 0.387 0.244 0.346 0.023 

 0.405 0.253 0.316 0.026 

 0.382 0.259 0.334 0.026 

 0.327 0.249 0.401 0.023 

 0.322 0.275 0.377 0.026 

 0.310 0.281 0.383 0.026 

 0.310 0.288 0.374 0.028 

2020 MOBILE6.2 Input File (KYSCN.IN) 

* Mobile6 file for Boone, Campbell and Kenton counties 

* post 2005 analysis years, includes annual scenario 

* created 4/9/07,AJR, post 2005 

************************ Header Section ***************** 

MOBILE6 INPUT FILE : 

POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO 

PARTICULATES : 

* PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE 

REPORT FILE : KY.RPT 

DATABASE OUTPUT : 

WITH FIELDNAMES : 

DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22 

DAILY OUTPUT : 

EMISSIONS TABLE : kyemiss.tb1 

RUN DATA 

************************ Run Section ******************* 

VMT BY HOUR : KYHVMT.D 

SPEED VMT : KYSVMT.D 

VMT BY FACILITY : KYFVMT.D 

STAGE II REFUELING : 

99 2 86. 86. 

EXPAND BUS EFS : 

REBUILD EFFECTS : 0.30 

********************* Summer Scenario Section **************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2020 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

FUEL RVP : 7.8 

FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 61.0 95.0 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 

********************* Annual Scenario Section ***************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2020 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

FUEL RVP : 9.0 

FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

43 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 

*********************************** END OF RUN ***************** 

END OF RUN 

2020 MOBILE6.2 Output File (KY.RPT)

*************************************************************************** 

* MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * 

* Input file: KYSCN.IN (file 2, run 1). * 

*************************************************************************** 

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: KYHVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external 

* data file: KYSVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: KYFVMT.D 

 Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors 

 M601 Comment: 

 User has enabled STAGE II REFUELING.

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx 

* File 2, Run 1, Scenario 1. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 

 HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUILD FRACTION IS 0.30. 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 

 Calendar Year: 2020 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 61.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 95.0 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: Yes 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.2788 0.4388 0.1507 0.0365 0.0003 0.0022 0.0876 0.0051 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.357 0.448 0.715 0.516 0.461 0.076 0.245 0.344 2.51 0.464 

 Composite CO : 5.89 6.65 8.60 7.15 9.61 0.789 0.570 0.645 19.77 6.366 

 Composite NOX : 0.277 0.377 0.663 0.450 0.567 0.072 0.303 1.954 1.17 0.541 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.989 0.308 0.497 

 Composite CO : 17.32 0.930 1.177 

 Composite NOX : 2.073 2.990 4.807 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* KY EMISSIONS - CY20xx 

* File 2, Run 1, Scenario 2. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

44 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 

 Calendar Year: 2020 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: Yes 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.2788 0.4388 0.1507 0.0365 0.0003 0.0022 0.0876 0.0051 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.353 0.452 0.728 0.523 0.425 0.076 0.245 0.344 2.29 0.465 

 Composite CO : 8.64 9.11 11.43 9.70 10.51 0.789 0.570 0.645 16.77 8.658 

 Composite NOX : 0.258 0.385 0.683 0.461 0.577 0.072 0.303 1.954 1.37 0.544 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.925 0.308 0.497 

 Composite CO : 18.93 0.930 1.177 

 Composite NOX : 2.110 2.990 4.807 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

45 

APPENDIX C

MOBILE6.2 Input/Output Files for the OKI’s Ohio Portion of 

Nonattainment Area 

 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

46 

VMT By Hour (OHHVMT.D), all analysis years

VMT BY HOUR 

 0.0478 0.0719 0.0796 0.0666 0.0563 0.0532 

 0.0545 0.0543 0.0515 0.0523 0.0560 0.0565 

 0.0504 0.0377 0.0266 0.0209 0.0197 0.0171 

 0.0142 0.0156 0.0188 0.0224 0.0251 0.0310 

2005 VMT by Speed Bin (OHSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 

1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0245 0.0260 0.0457 0.0369 0.0977 0.0216 0.7471

1 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0078 0.0159 0.0228 0.0486 0.0272 0.0987 0.0226 0.7556

1 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0005 0.0032 0.0028 0.0114 0.0156 0.0236 0.0401 0.0477 0.1113 0.0925 0.6510

1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0011 0.0036 0.0104 0.0160 0.0278 0.0461 0.0267 0.0984 0.0262 0.7431

1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0014 0.0114 0.0169 0.0305 0.0519 0.0281 0.0984 0.0207 0.7404

1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0011 0.0106 0.0192 0.0294 0.0551 0.0293 0.0981 0.0206 0.7365

1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0005 0.0039 0.0117 0.0176 0.0328 0.0552 0.0288 0.0979 0.0205 0.7308

1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0009 0.0039 0.0124 0.0173 0.0320 0.0538 0.0285 0.0980 0.0205 0.7323

1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0011 0.0119 0.0175 0.0303 0.0524 0.0287 0.0983 0.0207 0.7389

1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0011 0.0116 0.0170 0.0299 0.0505 0.0281 0.0985 0.0208 0.7425

1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0004 0.0034 0.0103 0.0154 0.0288 0.0487 0.0264 0.0991 0.0208 0.7465

1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0004 0.0034 0.0098 0.0146 0.0277 0.0463 0.0255 0.0994 0.0225 0.7501

1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0059 0.0199 0.0247 0.0465 0.0272 0.0991 0.0215 0.7551

1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0251 0.0260 0.0408 0.0355 0.0982 0.0218 0.7525

1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0257 0.0278 0.0411 0.0370 0.0980 0.0217 0.7487

1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0246 0.0267 0.0395 0.0359 0.0982 0.0218 0.7533

1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0221 0.0239 0.0371 0.0336 0.0984 0.0221 0.7628

1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0194 0.0210 0.0331 0.0306 0.0988 0.0225 0.7745

1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0201 0.0217 0.0356 0.0318 0.0986 0.0223 0.7700

1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0213 0.0231 0.0383 0.0334 0.0983 0.0221 0.7636

1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0223 0.0241 0.0391 0.0342 0.0983 0.0220 0.7600

1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0254 0.0275 0.0433 0.0375 0.0978 0.0216 0.7469

1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0266 0.0289 0.0448 0.0387 0.0977 0.0214 0.7419

1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0277 0.0300 0.0465 0.0399 0.0975 0.0213 0.7371

2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1578 0.0620 0.0730 0.2765 0.1939 0.2275 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 2 0.0000 0.0001 0.0003 0.1663 0.0714 0.1040 0.2602 0.1730 0.2158 0.0090 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 3 0.0000 0.0003 0.0015 0.1669 0.0822 0.1318 0.2418 0.1612 0.2066 0.0078 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 4 0.0000 0.0001 0.0007 0.1686 0.0757 0.1149 0.2628 0.1640 0.2046 0.0087 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1644 0.0669 0.0913 0.2843 0.1791 0.2046 0.0092 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1562 0.0624 0.0792 0.2941 0.1881 0.2104 0.0096 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1608 0.0669 0.0953 0.2868 0.1795 0.2012 0.0095 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1612 0.0679 0.0984 0.2857 0.1780 0.1997 0.0089 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.1606 0.0644 0.0840 0.2924 0.1866 0.2027 0.0094 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1679 0.0681 0.0894 0.2873 0.1807 0.1974 0.0091 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1627 0.0679 0.0981 0.2850 0.1779 0.1989 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.1531 0.0636 0.0912 0.2932 0.1845 0.2046 0.0096 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1567 0.0616 0.0752 0.2945 0.1960 0.2068 0.0092 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1572 0.0614 0.0694 0.2877 0.2041 0.2111 0.0091 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1613 0.0628 0.0682 0.2897 0.2043 0.2046 0.0090 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1598 0.0622 0.0672 0.2905 0.2064 0.2047 0.0091 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1614 0.0628 0.0678 0.2880 0.2032 0.2075 0.0092 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1722 0.0668 0.0686 0.2881 0.1972 0.1983 0.0088 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1568 0.0609 0.0645 0.2871 0.2074 0.2135 0.0099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1593 0.0619 0.0662 0.2840 0.2024 0.2165 0.0098 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1847 0.0717 0.0727 0.2813 0.1822 0.1991 0.0083 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1653 0.0645 0.0708 0.2833 0.1952 0.2120 0.0089 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1645 0.0642 0.0713 0.2837 0.1955 0.2119 0.0089 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1587 0.0620 0.0697 0.2843 0.2002 0.2159 0.0092 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2005 VMT by Facility (OHFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 

 1 0.341 0.451 0.181 0.027 

 0.360 0.432 0.184 0.025 

 0.372 0.428 0.174 0.026 

 0.351 0.440 0.182 0.028 

 0.336 0.452 0.183 0.030 

 0.335 0.460 0.174 0.031 

 0.323 0.466 0.180 0.032 

 0.326 0.463 0.179 0.032 

 0.339 0.454 0.177 0.031 

 0.341 0.446 0.183 0.030 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

47 

 0.355 0.441 0.174 0.030 

 0.375 0.435 0.160 0.030 

 0.376 0.430 0.165 0.029 

 0.362 0.438 0.172 0.028 

 0.354 0.441 0.176 0.029 

 0.368 0.433 0.170 0.029 

 0.392 0.415 0.166 0.027 

 0.420 0.388 0.167 0.025 

 0.425 0.398 0.150 0.027 

 0.400 0.413 0.160 0.027 

 0.357 0.418 0.200 0.025 

 0.340 0.446 0.186 0.028 

 0.328 0.454 0.190 0.028 

 0.325 0.462 0.184 0.029 

... 

Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel 

transit buses 

 26 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 

 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 

 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 

 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 

 0.196 0.753 0.024 0.027 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

 0.038 0.920 0.028 0.014 

2005 Vehicle Age Distribution File (OHREG.D), all analysis years

REG DIST 

* OHREG.D 

* This file contains the Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren 

* vehicle age distribution for LDV,LDT1,LDT2,LDT3, 

* and LDT4 vehicles from ODOT/OEPA 2004 VIN decoding project. 

* MOBILE6 default distributions are used for the remaining 

* vehicle classes. 

* 

* LDV 

 1 0.0286 0.0381 0.0426 0.0379 0.0991 0.1052 

 0.0903 0.0968 0.0763 0.0745 0.0590 0.0502 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

48 

 0.0414 0.0335 0.0304 0.0232 0.0182 0.0128 

 0.0102 0.0066 0.0048 0.0023 0.0013 0.0009 0.0158

* LDT1 

 2 0.0278 0.0371 0.0412 0.0210 0.0450 0.0478 

 0.0564 0.0525 0.0865 0.0706 0.0922 0.0696 

 0.0503 0.0587 0.0469 0.0439 0.0418 0.0360 

 0.0280 0.0143 0.0074 0.0038 0.0044 0.0028 0.014 

* LDT2 

 3 0.0345 0.0460 0.0511 0.0478 0.1204 0.1327 

 0.1232 0.1125 0.0802 0.0690 0.0550 0.0412 

 0.0269 0.0164 0.0120 0.0080 0.0095 0.0026 

 0.0029 0.0016 0.0016 0.0006 0.0005 0.0005 0.0033

* LDT3 

 4 0.0287 0.0383 0.0424 0.0398 0.1031 0.1525 

 0.0769 0.0740 0.0677 0.0768 0.0578 0.0461 

 0.0317 0.0221 0.0252 0.0249 0.0219 0.0136 

 0.0124 0.0083 0.0068 0.0030 0.0021 0.0008 0.0231

* LDT4 

 5 0.0386 0.0514 0.0569 0.0489 0.1129 0.2054 

 0.1223 0.1113 0.0698 0.0629 0.0500 0.0078 

 0.0133 0.0043 0.0046 0.0037 0.0039 0.0030 

 0.0030 0.0021 0.0018 0.0005 0.0002 0.0000 0.0214

2005 MOBILE6.2 Input File (OH.SCN)

* Mobile6 file for Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren counties, 

* OBD program initiated on 1/5/04 

* created 05/30/06 by ajr, new OEPA inputs for ozone, pre 2006 

******************* Header Section ************************ 

MOBILE6 INPUT FILE : 

POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO 

PARTICULATES : 

* PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE 

REPORT FILE : OH.RPT 

DATABASE OUTPUT : 

WITH FIELDNAMES : 

DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22 

DAILY OUTPUT : 

EMISSIONS TABLE : ohemiss.tb1 

 

RUN DATA 

******************* Run Section *************************** 

VMT BY HOUR : OHHVMT.D 

SPEED VMT : OHSVMT.D 

VMT BY FACILITY : OHFVMT.D 

REG DIST : OHREG.D 

FUEL RVP : 9.0 

EXPRESS HC AS VOC : 

* ANTI-TAMPERING PROGRAM 

ANTI-TAMP PROG : 

96 78 50 22222 21111111 1 12 098. 12111112 

 

* I/M PROGRAM(S) 

* OBD 

I/M PROGRAM : 1 2004 2005 2 T/O OBD I/M 

I/M MODEL YEARS : 1 1996 2050 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

49 

I/M VEHICLES : 1 22222 21111111 1 

I/M STRINGENCY : 1 30.0 

I/M COMPLIANCE : 1 98.0 

I/M WAIVER RATES : 1 1.0 1.0 

I/M EXEMPTION AGE : 1 25 

I/M GRACE PERIOD : 1 2 

 

* EVAP OBD with no post '07 HDGV 

I/M PROGRAM : 2 2004 2005 2 T/O EVAP OBD & GC 

I/M MODEL YEARS : 2 1996 2007 

I/M VEHICLES : 2 22222 11111111 1 

I/M COMPLIANCE : 2 98.0 

I/M WAIVER RATES : 2 1.0 1.0 

I/M EXEMPTION AGE : 2 25 

I/M GRACE PERIOD : 2 2 

 

* ASM 2525 

I/M PROGRAM : 4 2001 2005 2 T/O ASM 2525 PHASE-IN 

I/M MODEL YEARS : 4 1982 1995 

I/M VEHICLES : 4 22222 21111111 1 

I/M STRINGENCY : 4 30.0 

I/M COMPLIANCE : 4 98.0 

I/M WAIVER RATES : 4 1.0 1.0 

I/M EXEMPTION AGE : 4 25 

I/M GRACE PERIOD : 4 2 

 

* IDLE 

I/M PROGRAM : 5 1998 2000 2 T/O IDLE 

I/M MODEL YEARS : 5 1973 1996 

I/M VEHICLES : 5 22222 21111111 1 

I/M STRINGENCY : 5 30.0 

I/M COMPLIANCE : 5 98.0 

I/M WAIVER RATES : 5 1.0 1.0 

I/M EXEMPTION AGE : 5 25 

I/M GRACE PERIOD : 5 2 

 

* IM 240 

I/M PROGRAM : 6 1996 1997 2 T/O IM240 

I/M MODEL YEARS : 6 1971 1994 

I/M VEHICLES : 6 22222 21111111 1 

I/M STRINGENCY : 6 30.0 

I/M COMPLIANCE : 6 98.0 

I/M WAIVER RATES : 6 1.0 1.0 

I/M EXEMPTION AGE : 6 25 

I/M CUTPOINTs : 6 CUTPOINT.D 

I/M GRACE PERIOD : 6 2 

 

* GC 

I/M PROGRAM : 7 1996 2005 2 T/O GC 

I/M MODEL YEARS : 7 1982 1995 

I/M VEHICLES : 7 22222 21111111 1 

I/M COMPLIANCE : 7 98.0 

I/M WAIVER RATES : 7 1.0 1.0 

I/M EXEMPTION AGE : 7 25 

I/M GRACE PERIOD : 7 2 

FUEL PROGRAM : 1 

OXYGENATED FUELS : .000 .420 .000 .036 2 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

50 

STAGE II REFUELING : 

93 3 86. 86. 

EXPAND BUS EFS : 

******************* Summer Scenario Section *************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : Ohio Emissions - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2005 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

SEASON : 1 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 61.0 95.0 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 317.00 

******************* Annual Scenario Section *************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : Ohio Emissions - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2005 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 317.00 

******************* End of Run **************************** 

END OF RUN 

 

2005 MOBILE6.2 Output Report (OH.RPT) 

*************************************************************************** 

* MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * 

* Input file: OHSCN.IN (file 3, run 1). * 

*************************************************************************** 

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: OHHVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external 

* data file: OHSVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: OHFVMT.D 

 Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors 

* Reading Registration Distributions from the following external 

* data file: OHREG.D 

* Reading ASM I/M Test Credits from ASMDATA.D 

* Reading non-default I/M CUTPOINTS from the following external 

* data file: CUTPOINT.D 

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

 M601 Comment: 

 User has enabled STAGE II REFUELING.

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Ohio Emissions - CY20xx 

* File 3, Run 1, Scenario 1. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

*** I/M credits for Tech1&2 vehicles were read from the following external 

 data file: TECH12.D 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 Calendar Year: 2005 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 61.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 95.0 (F) 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

51 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi 

 Weathered RVP: 8.9 psi 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 92. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: Yes 

 Evap I/M Program: Yes 

 ATP Program: Yes 

 Reformulated Gas: No 

 Ether Blend Market Share: 0.000 Alcohol Blend Market Share: 0.420 

 Ether Blend Oxygen Content: 0.000 Alcohol Blend Oxygen Content: 0.036 

 Alcohol Blend RVP Waiver: Yes 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.4050 0.3396 0.1270 0.0359 0.0006 0.0019 0.0845 0.0057 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 1.251 1.047 1.216 1.093 1.894 0.644 0.657 0.579 3.53 1.155 

 Composite CO : 12.48 13.44 15.01 13.87 18.13 1.751 1.132 3.410 17.88 12.568 

 Composite NOX : 0.915 1.164 1.494 1.254 4.265 1.606 1.480 12.715 1.23 2.194 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0009 0.0016 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 8.840 0.583 0.787 

 Composite CO : 114.81 4.539 2.970 

 Composite NOX : 8.411 16.545 13.772 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Ohio Emissions - CY20xx 

* File 3, Run 1, Scenario 2. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 Calendar Year: 2005 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi 

 Weathered RVP: 9.5 psi 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 92. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: Yes 

 Evap I/M Program: Yes 

 ATP Program: Yes 

 Reformulated Gas: No 

 Ether Blend Market Share: 0.000 Alcohol Blend Market Share: 0.420 

 Ether Blend Oxygen Content: 0.000 Alcohol Blend Oxygen Content: 0.036 

 Alcohol Blend RVP Waiver: Yes 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.4050 0.3396 0.1270 0.0359 0.0006 0.0019 0.0845 0.0057 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.994 0.913 1.096 0.963 1.414 0.644 0.657 0.579 2.15 0.965 

 Composite CO : 13.81 16.00 17.13 16.31 16.88 1.751 1.132 3.410 15.23 14.185 

 Composite NOX : 0.892 1.205 1.546 1.298 4.367 1.606 1.480 12.715 1.45 2.210 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0003 0.0009 0.0016 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 6.768 0.583 0.787 

 Composite CO : 99.19 4.539 2.970 

 Composite NOX : 8.902 16.545 13.772 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2008 VMT by Speed bin (OHSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 

1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0009 0.0170 0.0245 0.0392 0.0435 0.0977 0.0165 0.7606

1 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0000 0.0012 0.0063 0.0104 0.0223 0.0401 0.0340 0.0993 0.0282 0.7579

1 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0008 0.0019 0.0021 0.0026 0.0075 0.0099 0.0233 0.0378 0.0426 0.1159 0.0909 0.6648

1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 0.0021 0.0028 0.0079 0.0105 0.0250 0.0373 0.0337 0.0979 0.0282 0.7536

1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0021 0.0081 0.0127 0.0269 0.0418 0.0349 0.0981 0.0161 0.7588

1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0022 0.0082 0.0126 0.0285 0.0434 0.0362 0.0975 0.0165 0.7550

1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0021 0.0024 0.0100 0.0121 0.0307 0.0413 0.0367 0.0979 0.0160 0.7508
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

52 

1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0005 0.0022 0.0024 0.0102 0.0117 0.0310 0.0398 0.0356 0.0976 0.0160 0.7529

1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.0024 0.0079 0.0129 0.0281 0.0415 0.0342 0.0976 0.0161 0.7589

1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.0024 0.0079 0.0125 0.0271 0.0405 0.0330 0.0974 0.0162 0.7627

1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0017 0.0022 0.0088 0.0105 0.0269 0.0373 0.0318 0.0979 0.0191 0.7637

1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0017 0.0021 0.0084 0.0099 0.0259 0.0360 0.0300 0.0990 0.0260 0.7608

1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0062 0.0120 0.0252 0.0373 0.0299 0.0981 0.0165 0.7746

1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0005 0.0170 0.0249 0.0343 0.0378 0.0969 0.0169 0.7717

1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0183 0.0260 0.0332 0.0398 0.0963 0.0169 0.7695

1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0176 0.0249 0.0322 0.0381 0.0962 0.0170 0.7740

1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0158 0.0224 0.0308 0.0358 0.0952 0.0172 0.7827

1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0139 0.0197 0.0281 0.0312 0.0946 0.0175 0.7949

1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0144 0.0203 0.0302 0.0343 0.0955 0.0173 0.7879

1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0153 0.0216 0.0322 0.0375 0.0961 0.0171 0.7802

1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0160 0.0225 0.0327 0.0383 0.0964 0.0170 0.7771

1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0182 0.0257 0.0353 0.0428 0.0971 0.0167 0.7642

1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0191 0.0270 0.0361 0.0443 0.0971 0.0166 0.7598

1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0198 0.0280 0.0372 0.0463 0.0974 0.0165 0.7547

2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2542 0.0514 0.0702 0.2335 0.1911 0.1904 0.0091 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 2 0.0001 0.0001 0.0004 0.2669 0.0666 0.1030 0.2050 0.1671 0.1821 0.0088 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 3 0.0001 0.0004 0.0029 0.2676 0.0786 0.1230 0.1961 0.1486 0.1736 0.0091 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 4 0.0000 0.0001 0.0007 0.2734 0.0676 0.1091 0.2127 0.1617 0.1652 0.0094 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.2685 0.0580 0.0845 0.2334 0.1818 0.1639 0.0099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2570 0.0536 0.0767 0.2417 0.1915 0.1692 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.2648 0.0578 0.0871 0.2399 0.1785 0.1616 0.0101 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.2656 0.0588 0.0893 0.2392 0.1771 0.1596 0.0102 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2642 0.0561 0.0787 0.2402 0.1894 0.1611 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.2747 0.0590 0.0818 0.2351 0.1837 0.1556 0.0100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.2673 0.0591 0.0898 0.2373 0.1770 0.1593 0.0100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2537 0.0550 0.0864 0.2455 0.1838 0.1652 0.0104 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2577 0.0527 0.0716 0.2418 0.2005 0.1656 0.0101 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2570 0.0520 0.0636 0.2413 0.2055 0.1706 0.0098 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2642 0.0534 0.0618 0.2415 0.2062 0.1630 0.0099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2625 0.0531 0.0609 0.2417 0.2090 0.1626 0.0101 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2640 0.0534 0.0613 0.2404 0.2048 0.1662 0.0099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2796 0.0566 0.0610 0.2394 0.1974 0.1565 0.0096 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2581 0.0522 0.0580 0.2389 0.2104 0.1720 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2603 0.0526 0.0596 0.2377 0.2036 0.1762 0.0100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2941 0.0595 0.0641 0.2359 0.1782 0.1596 0.0086 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2672 0.0540 0.0641 0.2387 0.1940 0.1726 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2660 0.0538 0.0648 0.2392 0.1943 0.1726 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2582 0.0522 0.0637 0.2396 0.2003 0.1764 0.0096 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2008 VMT by Facility Type (OHFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 

 1 0.322 0.427 0.234 0.017 

 0.339 0.409 0.236 0.016 

 0.353 0.404 0.226 0.017 

 0.332 0.412 0.238 0.018 

 0.319 0.422 0.239 0.019 

 0.320 0.431 0.229 0.020 

 0.308 0.434 0.238 0.020 

 0.311 0.431 0.237 0.020 

 0.324 0.424 0.233 0.020 

 0.325 0.415 0.241 0.019 

 0.339 0.412 0.230 0.019 

 0.361 0.407 0.213 0.019 

 0.360 0.403 0.218 0.018 

 0.345 0.411 0.225 0.018 

 0.337 0.413 0.232 0.019 

 0.352 0.405 0.225 0.019 

 0.373 0.391 0.219 0.018 

 0.398 0.365 0.220 0.016 

 0.407 0.376 0.200 0.017 

 0.381 0.390 0.211 0.017 

 0.334 0.392 0.259 0.016 

 0.321 0.419 0.242 0.018 

 0.309 0.426 0.246 0.018 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

53 

 0.308 0.434 0.239 0.019 

... 

Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel 

transit buses 

 26 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 

 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 

 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 

 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 

 0.215 0.733 0.032 0.019 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 0.029 0.927 0.037 0.007 

 

2008 MOBILE6.2 Input File (OHSCN.IN) 

* Mobile6 input file for Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren counties, 

* low RVP beginning summer 2008 

* created 4/9/07 by ajr, includes annual scenario,low RVP,post 2007 

******************* Header Section ************************ 

MOBILE6 INPUT FILE : 

POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO 

PARTICULATES : 

* PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE 

REPORT FILE : oh.rpt 

DATABASE OUTPUT : 

WITH FIELDNAMES : 

DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22 

DAILY OUTPUT : 

EMISSIONS TABLE : ohemiss.tb1 

 

RUN DATA 

******************* Run Section *************************** 

VMT BY HOUR : OHHVMT.D 

SPEED VMT : OHSVMT.D 

VMT BY FACILITY : OHFVMT.D 

REG DIST : OHREG.D 

FUEL PROGRAM : 1 

OXYGENATED FUELS : .000 .420 .000 .036 2 

STAGE II REFUELING : 

93 3 86. 86. 

EXPAND BUS EFS : 

REBUILD EFFECTS : 0.10 

******************* Summer Scenario Section *************** 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

54 

SCENARIO RECORD : Ohio Emissions - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2008 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

FUEL RVP : 7.8 

SEASON : 1 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 62.0 91.3 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV 

PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 

******************* Annual Scenario Section *************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : Ohio Emissions - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2008 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

FUEL RVP : 9.0 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV 

PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 

******************* End of Run **************************** 

END OF RUN 

2008 MOBILE6.2 Output Report (OH.RPT) 

*************************************************************************** 

* MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * 

* Input file: OHSCN.IN (file 3, run 1). * 

*************************************************************************** 

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: OHHVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external 

* data file: OHSVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: OHFVMT.D 

 Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors 

* Reading Registration Distributions from the following external 

* data file: OHREG.D 

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

 M601 Comment: 

 User has enabled STAGE II REFUELING.

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Ohio Emissions - CY20xx 

* File 3, Run 1, Scenario 1. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUILD FRACTION IS 0.10. 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 

 Calendar Year: 2008 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 62.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 91.3 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi 

 Weathered RVP: 8.0 psi 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: No 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

55 

 Ether Blend Market Share: 0.000 Alcohol Blend Market Share: 0.420 

 Ether Blend Oxygen Content: 0.000 Alcohol Blend Oxygen Content: 0.036 

 Alcohol Blend RVP Waiver: Yes 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.3623 0.3705 0.1385 0.0357 0.0004 0.0020 0.0851 0.0055 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.923 0.802 1.007 0.858 1.312 0.344 0.566 0.516 2.74 0.878 

 Composite CO : 9.49 10.52 12.46 11.05 14.02 1.351 0.961 2.825 18.05 9.905 

 Composite NOX : 0.741 0.965 1.408 1.085 2.929 0.875 1.174 10.042 1.22 1.790 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0002 0.0009 0.0017 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 7.094 0.399 0.742 

 Composite CO : 94.69 3.770 2.830 

 Composite NOX : 7.696 14.196 12.082 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Ohio Emissions - CY20xx 

* File 3, Run 1, Scenario 2. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 

 Calendar Year: 2008 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi 

 Weathered RVP: 9.5 psi 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: No 

 Ether Blend Market Share: 0.000 Alcohol Blend Market Share: 0.420 

 Ether Blend Oxygen Content: 0.000 Alcohol Blend Oxygen Content: 0.036 

 Alcohol Blend RVP Waiver: Yes 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.3623 0.3705 0.1385 0.0357 0.0004 0.0020 0.0851 0.0055 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.880 0.817 1.051 0.881 1.177 0.344 0.566 0.516 2.21 0.866 

 Composite CO : 12.77 14.60 16.75 15.18 14.75 1.351 0.961 2.825 16.12 13.214 

 Composite NOX : 0.736 1.018 1.487 1.146 2.981 0.875 1.174 10.042 1.42 1.822 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0002 0.0009 0.0017 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 6.413 0.399 0.742 

 Composite CO : 91.20 3.770 2.830 

 Composite NOX : 8.489 14.196 12.082 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2015 VMT by Speed Bin (OHSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 

1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 0.0166 0.0177 0.0522 0.0350 0.1026 0.0217 0.7531

1 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0014 0.0060 0.0104 0.0153 0.0512 0.0329 0.0986 0.0326 0.7514

1 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0005 0.0015 0.0021 0.0023 0.0097 0.0118 0.0280 0.0446 0.0425 0.1089 0.0504 0.6978

1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0012 0.0010 0.0031 0.0084 0.0118 0.0171 0.0469 0.0333 0.0990 0.0334 0.7449

1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0009 0.0012 0.0074 0.0141 0.0185 0.0523 0.0352 0.0982 0.0227 0.7494

1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0016 0.0076 0.0142 0.0199 0.0541 0.0359 0.0982 0.0216 0.7466

1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0013 0.0020 0.0103 0.0146 0.0197 0.0533 0.0363 0.0983 0.0215 0.7422

1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0017 0.0022 0.0104 0.0140 0.0196 0.0521 0.0357 0.0984 0.0216 0.7440

1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0014 0.0074 0.0149 0.0191 0.0515 0.0354 0.0983 0.0217 0.7498

1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0014 0.0074 0.0143 0.0186 0.0498 0.0347 0.0983 0.0228 0.7523

1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.0011 0.0017 0.0090 0.0128 0.0173 0.0465 0.0336 0.0983 0.0230 0.7562

1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.0011 0.0021 0.0084 0.0120 0.0165 0.0444 0.0325 0.0995 0.0326 0.7506
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

56 

1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0055 0.0122 0.0174 0.0453 0.0329 0.0985 0.0232 0.7643

1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0170 0.0178 0.0429 0.0340 0.1035 0.0221 0.7620

1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0185 0.0186 0.0430 0.0352 0.1035 0.0221 0.7591

1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0177 0.0179 0.0412 0.0341 0.1035 0.0222 0.7633

1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0159 0.0160 0.0394 0.0320 0.1032 0.0225 0.7710

1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0140 0.0141 0.0346 0.0292 0.1032 0.0229 0.7820

1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0144 0.0145 0.0385 0.0303 0.1030 0.0226 0.7766

1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0153 0.0154 0.0422 0.0319 0.1029 0.0224 0.7699

1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0160 0.0161 0.0428 0.0327 0.1031 0.0223 0.7671

1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0183 0.0184 0.0473 0.0357 0.1031 0.0219 0.7553

1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0192 0.0193 0.0487 0.0369 0.1032 0.0218 0.7510

1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0199 0.0201 0.0508 0.0381 0.1031 0.0216 0.7464

2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2312 0.0536 0.0672 0.2361 0.1827 0.2125 0.0167 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 2 0.0000 0.0003 0.0007 0.2425 0.0638 0.0960 0.2145 0.1665 0.1997 0.0159 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 3 0.0000 0.0010 0.0020 0.2432 0.0746 0.1140 0.2082 0.1479 0.1937 0.0153 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 4 0.0000 0.0005 0.0006 0.2465 0.0686 0.1025 0.2170 0.1588 0.1885 0.0170 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.2407 0.0592 0.0853 0.2334 0.1750 0.1887 0.0173 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.2299 0.0541 0.0771 0.2416 0.1843 0.1951 0.0179 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.2363 0.0594 0.0881 0.2359 0.1754 0.1866 0.0179 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.2369 0.0602 0.0901 0.2368 0.1726 0.1850 0.0179 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.2359 0.0561 0.0798 0.2408 0.1817 0.1876 0.0178 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.2454 0.0596 0.0838 0.2355 0.1760 0.1820 0.0174 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 11 0.0000 0.0001 0.0004 0.2388 0.0603 0.0908 0.2336 0.1739 0.1845 0.0176 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.2263 0.0561 0.0867 0.2408 0.1809 0.1909 0.0181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2302 0.0536 0.0726 0.2435 0.1904 0.1922 0.0175 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2307 0.0529 0.0627 0.2460 0.1936 0.1970 0.0171 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2364 0.0540 0.0612 0.2468 0.1938 0.1905 0.0171 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2345 0.0536 0.0605 0.2475 0.1959 0.1907 0.0174 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2365 0.0540 0.0609 0.2453 0.1927 0.1933 0.0173 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2508 0.0571 0.0611 0.2438 0.1865 0.1840 0.0167 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2305 0.0525 0.0580 0.2445 0.1969 0.1994 0.0182 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2337 0.0533 0.0595 0.2420 0.1919 0.2018 0.0178 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2672 0.0608 0.0643 0.2373 0.1717 0.1831 0.0155 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2415 0.0553 0.0634 0.2416 0.1849 0.1968 0.0166 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2404 0.0551 0.0639 0.2421 0.1852 0.1968 0.0165 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2327 0.0534 0.0627 0.2431 0.1900 0.2010 0.0170 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2015 VMT by Facility Type (OHFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 

 1 0.328 0.428 0.225 0.019 

 0.346 0.409 0.228 0.018 

 0.359 0.406 0.217 0.019 

 0.337 0.416 0.227 0.020 

 0.323 0.427 0.229 0.021 

 0.323 0.436 0.219 0.022 

 0.311 0.440 0.227 0.022 

 0.314 0.438 0.226 0.022 

 0.327 0.430 0.222 0.022 

 0.328 0.421 0.230 0.021 

 0.342 0.418 0.219 0.021 

 0.363 0.414 0.202 0.021 

 0.364 0.408 0.208 0.020 

 0.350 0.415 0.215 0.020 

 0.341 0.418 0.221 0.021 

 0.356 0.410 0.214 0.020 

 0.378 0.394 0.208 0.019 

 0.404 0.368 0.210 0.018 

 0.412 0.380 0.190 0.019 

 0.386 0.393 0.202 0.019 

 0.341 0.393 0.249 0.018 

 0.327 0.421 0.232 0.019 

 0.315 0.429 0.236 0.020 

 0.312 0.438 0.229 0.021 

... 

Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel 

transit buses 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

57 

 26 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 

 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 

 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 

 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 

 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

2015 MOBILE6.2 Input File (OHSCN.IN) 

* Mobile6 input file for Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren 

counties, 

* low RVP beginning summer 2008 

* created 4/9/07 by ajr, includes annual scenario,low RVP,post 2007 

******************* Header Section ************************ 

MOBILE6 INPUT FILE : 

POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO 

PARTICULATES : 

* PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE 

REPORT FILE : oh.rpt 

DATABASE OUTPUT : 

WITH FIELDNAMES : 

DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22 

DAILY OUTPUT : 

EMISSIONS TABLE : ohemiss.tb1 

 

RUN DATA 

******************* Run Section *************************** 

VMT BY HOUR : OHHVMT.D 

SPEED VMT : OHSVMT.D 

VMT BY FACILITY : OHFVMT.D 

REG DIST : OHREG.D 

FUEL PROGRAM : 1 

OXYGENATED FUELS : .000 .420 .000 .036 2 

STAGE II REFUELING : 

93 3 86. 86. 

EXPAND BUS EFS : 

REBUILD EFFECTS : 0.10 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

58 

******************* Summer Scenario Section *************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : Ohio Emissions - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2015 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

FUEL RVP : 7.8 

SEASON : 1 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 62.0 91.3 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 

******************* Annual Scenario Section *************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : Ohio Emissions - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2015 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

FUEL RVP : 9.0 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV 

PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 

******************* End of Run **************************** 

END OF RUN 

2015 MOBILE6.2 Output File (OH.RPT)

*************************************************************************** 

* MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * 

* Input file: OHSCN.IN (file 3, run 1). * 

*************************************************************************** 

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: OHHVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external 

* data file: OHSVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: OHFVMT.D 

 Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors 

* Reading Registration Distributions from the following external 

* data file: OHREG.D 

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

 M601 Comment: 

 User has enabled STAGE II REFUELING.

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Ohio Emissions - CY20xx 

* File 3, Run 1, Scenario 1. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 

 HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUILD FRACTION IS 0.10. 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 

 Calendar Year: 2015 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 62.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 91.3 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

59 

 Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi 

 Weathered RVP: 8.0 psi 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: No 

 Ether Blend Market Share: 0.000 Alcohol Blend Market Share: 0.420 

 Ether Blend Oxygen Content: 0.000 Alcohol Blend Oxygen Content: 0.036 

 Alcohol Blend RVP Waiver: Yes 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.2935 0.4202 0.1571 0.0357 0.0003 0.0023 0.0858 0.0052 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.491 0.462 0.588 0.496 0.674 0.112 0.213 0.340 2.71 0.498 

 Composite CO : 6.84 7.42 8.25 7.65 8.93 0.820 0.479 0.951 17.80 6.917 

 Composite NOX : 0.379 0.455 0.622 0.500 1.098 0.173 0.308 3.792 1.23 0.772 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0009 0.0019 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 2.023 0.284 0.518 

 Composite CO : 16.22 1.696 1.499 

 Composite NOX : 4.015 6.477 7.115 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Ohio Emissions - CY20xx 

* File 3, Run 1, Scenario 2. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 

 Calendar Year: 2015 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi 

 Weathered RVP: 9.5 psi 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: No 

 Ether Blend Market Share: 0.000 Alcohol Blend Market Share: 0.420 

 Ether Blend Oxygen Content: 0.000 Alcohol Blend Oxygen Content: 0.036 

 Alcohol Blend RVP Waiver: Yes 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.2935 0.4202 0.1571 0.0357 0.0003 0.0023 0.0858 0.0052 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.483 0.483 0.616 0.519 0.605 0.112 0.213 0.340 2.18 0.504 

 Composite CO : 10.09 10.46 11.35 10.70 9.79 0.820 0.479 0.951 15.90 9.654 

 Composite NOX : 0.373 0.476 0.651 0.523 1.104 0.173 0.308 3.792 1.43 0.784 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0009 0.0019 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 1.794 0.284 0.518 

 Composite CO : 17.78 1.696 1.499 

 Composite NOX : 4.036 6.477 7.115 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2020 VMT by Speed Bin (OHSVMT.D)

SPEED VMT 

1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 0.0164 0.0170 0.0526 0.0353 0.1036 0.0214 0.7526

1 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.0001 0.0005 0.0008 0.0062 0.0106 0.0166 0.0490 0.0342 0.0987 0.0469 0.7362

1 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 0.0019 0.0018 0.0038 0.0103 0.0195 0.0277 0.0554 0.0287 0.1103 0.0632 0.6766

1 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0013 0.0016 0.0032 0.0081 0.0121 0.0164 0.0478 0.0326 0.1078 0.0460 0.7230
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

60 

1 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0009 0.0016 0.0086 0.0128 0.0188 0.0511 0.0352 0.0993 0.0223 0.7493

1 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0006 0.0011 0.0085 0.0132 0.0202 0.0530 0.0364 0.0992 0.0213 0.7465

1 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0008 0.0013 0.0031 0.0091 0.0149 0.0190 0.0535 0.0355 0.0994 0.0221 0.7413

1 8 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 0.0014 0.0037 0.0096 0.0140 0.0187 0.0518 0.0350 0.0994 0.0222 0.7431

1 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0008 0.0018 0.0085 0.0129 0.0198 0.0501 0.0356 0.0994 0.0224 0.7488

1 10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0017 0.0082 0.0125 0.0192 0.0487 0.0348 0.0994 0.0225 0.7522

1 11 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0011 0.0028 0.0080 0.0131 0.0167 0.0466 0.0330 0.1003 0.0293 0.7485

1 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0007 0.0012 0.0025 0.0078 0.0123 0.0166 0.0437 0.0319 0.1006 0.0406 0.7422

1 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0008 0.0058 0.0117 0.0168 0.0451 0.0332 0.0996 0.0228 0.7642

1 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0009 0.0164 0.0173 0.0435 0.0339 0.1045 0.0218 0.7618

1 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0181 0.0181 0.0431 0.0355 0.1045 0.0217 0.7590

1 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0173 0.0173 0.0413 0.0344 0.1045 0.0219 0.7632

1 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0156 0.0156 0.0395 0.0324 0.1041 0.0222 0.7707

1 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0137 0.0137 0.0348 0.0296 0.1042 0.0225 0.7816

1 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0141 0.0141 0.0387 0.0307 0.1040 0.0223 0.7761

1 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0150 0.0149 0.0425 0.0322 0.1039 0.0220 0.7694

1 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0157 0.0156 0.0430 0.0330 0.1040 0.0219 0.7667

1 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0179 0.0178 0.0476 0.0360 0.1041 0.0215 0.7550

1 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0188 0.0187 0.0489 0.0372 0.1041 0.0214 0.7508

1 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0195 0.0195 0.0511 0.0383 0.1041 0.0213 0.7462

2 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2688 0.0500 0.0658 0.2243 0.1692 0.2056 0.0162 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 2 0.0001 0.0004 0.0006 0.2824 0.0622 0.0970 0.1974 0.1545 0.1910 0.0145 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 3 0.0001 0.0010 0.0032 0.2832 0.0763 0.1114 0.1912 0.1380 0.1821 0.0134 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 4 0.0000 0.0006 0.0011 0.2864 0.0669 0.1044 0.2008 0.1441 0.1799 0.0158 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 5 0.0000 0.0001 0.0005 0.2800 0.0563 0.0875 0.2159 0.1609 0.1819 0.0168 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0.2681 0.0522 0.0785 0.2248 0.1703 0.1885 0.0174 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 7 0.0000 0.0001 0.0006 0.2754 0.0573 0.0907 0.2186 0.1593 0.1806 0.0174 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 8 0.0000 0.0002 0.0005 0.2765 0.0580 0.0922 0.2189 0.1584 0.1780 0.0174 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 9 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.2747 0.0542 0.0818 0.2228 0.1682 0.1808 0.0173 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 10 0.0000 0.0001 0.0005 0.2853 0.0572 0.0854 0.2166 0.1631 0.1750 0.0168 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 11 0.0000 0.0001 0.0006 0.2783 0.0577 0.0923 0.2179 0.1576 0.1785 0.0171 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 12 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004 0.2643 0.0540 0.0880 0.2274 0.1638 0.1844 0.0176 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 13 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2684 0.0500 0.0730 0.2302 0.1753 0.1861 0.0170 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 14 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2686 0.0493 0.0605 0.2334 0.1809 0.1908 0.0166 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 15 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2752 0.0503 0.0588 0.2339 0.1810 0.1843 0.0166 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 16 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2731 0.0499 0.0580 0.2346 0.1830 0.1846 0.0169 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 17 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2753 0.0503 0.0584 0.2324 0.1799 0.1870 0.0168 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 18 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2911 0.0530 0.0584 0.2303 0.1736 0.1774 0.0161 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 19 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2688 0.0490 0.0557 0.2318 0.1841 0.1930 0.0177 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 20 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2721 0.0497 0.0571 0.2293 0.1793 0.1952 0.0173 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 21 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3086 0.0562 0.0612 0.2237 0.1594 0.1759 0.0150 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 22 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2804 0.0514 0.0608 0.2289 0.1724 0.1901 0.0161 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 23 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2792 0.0512 0.0613 0.2294 0.1728 0.1902 0.0160 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2 24 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2707 0.0497 0.0603 0.2307 0.1775 0.1946 0.0166 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2020 VMT by Facility Type (OHFVMT.D)

VMT BY FACILITY 

 1 0.319 0.414 0.249 0.018 

 0.336 0.395 0.252 0.017 

 0.349 0.393 0.241 0.018 

 0.328 0.401 0.253 0.019 

 0.314 0.412 0.254 0.020 

 0.315 0.421 0.244 0.021 

 0.303 0.424 0.252 0.021 

 0.306 0.422 0.251 0.021 

 0.318 0.414 0.247 0.021 

 0.319 0.405 0.256 0.020 

 0.333 0.403 0.244 0.020 

 0.355 0.400 0.225 0.020 

 0.354 0.395 0.232 0.019 

 0.340 0.402 0.239 0.019 

 0.331 0.403 0.246 0.019 

 0.346 0.396 0.238 0.019 

 0.368 0.381 0.232 0.018 

 0.393 0.355 0.235 0.017 

 0.402 0.368 0.212 0.018 

 0.376 0.380 0.225 0.018 

 0.330 0.377 0.276 0.017 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

61 

 0.317 0.406 0.258 0.018 

 0.305 0.414 0.262 0.019 

 0.304 0.423 0.254 0.020 

... 

Identical distribution for all veh. types with the exception of diesel 

transit buses 

 26 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 

 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 

 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 

 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 

 0.179 0.747 0.054 0.020 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

 0.024 0.925 0.042 0.009 

2020 MOBILE6.2 Input File (OHSCN.IN) 

* Mobile6 input file for Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren counties, 

* low RVP beginning summer 2008 

* created 4/9/07 by ajr, includes annual scenario,low RVP,post 2007 

******************* Header Section ************************ 

MOBILE6 INPUT FILE : 

POLLUTANTS : HC NOx CO 

PARTICULATES : 

* PARTICULATES REPORTED IN *.PM FILE 

REPORT FILE : oh.rpt 

DATABASE OUTPUT : 

WITH FIELDNAMES : 

DATABASE EMISSIONS : 2211 1111 22 

DAILY OUTPUT : 

EMISSIONS TABLE : ohemiss.tb1 

 

RUN DATA 

******************* Run Section *************************** 

VMT BY HOUR : OHHVMT.D 

SPEED VMT : OHSVMT.D 

VMT BY FACILITY : OHFVMT.D 

REG DIST : OHREG.D 

FUEL PROGRAM : 1 

OXYGENATED FUELS : .000 .420 .000 .036 2 

STAGE II REFUELING : 

93 3 86. 86. 

EXPAND BUS EFS : 

REBUILD EFFECTS : 0.10 

******************* Summer Scenario Section *************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : Ohio Emissions - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2020 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

FUEL RVP : 7.8 

SEASON : 1 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 62.0 91.3 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 

******************* Annual Scenario Section *************** 

SCENARIO RECORD : Ohio Emissions - CY20xx 

CALENDAR YEAR : 2020 

EVALUATION MONTH : 7 

FUEL RVP : 9.0 

MIN/MAX TEMP : 47.0 64.0 

PARTICLE SIZE : 2.5 

PARTICULATE EF : PMGZML.CSV PMGDR1.CSV PMGDR2.CSV PMDZML.CSV PMDDR1.CSV PMDDR2.CSV 

DIESEL SULFUR : 43 

******************* End of Run **************************** 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

62 

END OF RUN 

2020 MOBILE6.2 Output File (OH.RPT)

*************************************************************************** 

* MOBILE6.2.03 (24-Sep-2003) * 

* Input file: OHSCN.IN (file 3, run 1). * 

*************************************************************************** 

* Reading Hourly VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: OHHVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly, Roadway, and Speed VMT dist. from the following external 

* data file: OHSVMT.D 

* Reading Hourly Roadway VMT distribution from the following external 

* data file: OHFVMT.D 

 Reading User Supplied ROADWAY VMT Factors 

* Reading Registration Distributions from the following external 

* data file: OHREG.D 

 M616 Comment: 

 User has supplied post-1999 sulfur levels. 

 M601 Comment: 

 User has enabled STAGE II REFUELING.

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Ohio Emissions - CY20xx 

* File 3, Run 1, Scenario 1. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 

 HDDV DEFEAT DEVICE EFFECTS ARE PRESENT. THE REBUILD FRACTION IS 0.10. 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 

 Calendar Year: 2020 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 62.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 91.3 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Nominal Fuel RVP: 7.8 psi 

 Weathered RVP: 8.0 psi 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: No 

 Ether Blend Market Share: 0.000 Alcohol Blend Market Share: 0.420 

 Ether Blend Oxygen Content: 0.000 Alcohol Blend Oxygen Content: 0.036 

 Alcohol Blend RVP Waiver: Yes 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.2697 0.4367 0.1632 0.0361 0.0002 0.0024 0.0866 0.0051 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.406 0.411 0.498 0.435 0.483 0.071 0.150 0.311 2.74 0.429 

 Composite CO : 6.26 6.92 7.62 7.11 8.96 0.738 0.426 0.572 18.16 6.420 

 Composite NOX : 0.282 0.365 0.489 0.399 0.586 0.066 0.188 1.946 1.22 0.512 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 1.010 0.275 0.449 

 Composite CO : 16.27 0.806 1.044 

 Composite NOX : 2.141 2.876 4.709 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Ohio Emissions - CY20xx 

* File 3, Run 1, Scenario 2. 

* # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

* Reading PM Gas Carbon ZML Levels 

* from the external data file PMGZML.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR1 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR1.CSV 

* Reading PM Gas Carbon DR2 Levels 

* from the external data file PMGDR2.CSV 

* Reading PM Diesel Zero Mile Levels 

* from the external data file PMDZML.CSV 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

63 

* Reading the First PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR1.CSV 

* Reading the Second PM Deterioration Rates 

* from the external data file PMDDR2.CSV 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class HDGV8b 

 M 48 Warning: 

 there are no sales for vehicle class LDDT12 

 M111 Warning: 

 The input dIesel sulfur level of 43.0 ppm exceeds 

 the 2007 HDD Rule diesel sulfur limit of 15 ppm. 

 Calendar Year: 2020 

 Month: July 

 Altitude: Low 

 Minimum Temperature: 47.0 (F) 

 Maximum Temperature: 64.0 (F) 

 Absolute Humidity: 75. grains/lb 

 Nominal Fuel RVP: 9.0 psi 

 Weathered RVP: 9.5 psi 

 Fuel Sulfur Content: 30. ppm 

 Exhaust I/M Program: No 

 Evap I/M Program: No 

 ATP Program: No 

 Reformulated Gas: No 

 Ether Blend Market Share: 0.000 Alcohol Blend Market Share: 0.420 

 Ether Blend Oxygen Content: 0.000 Alcohol Blend Oxygen Content: 0.036 

 Alcohol Blend RVP Waiver: Yes 

 Vehicle Type: LDGV LDGT12 LDGT34 LDGT HDGV LDDV LDDT HDDV MC All Veh 

 GVWR: <6000 >6000 (All) 

 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Distribution: 0.2697 0.4367 0.1632 0.0361 0.0002 0.0024 0.0866 0.0051 1.0000 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.401 0.431 0.523 0.456 0.439 0.071 0.150 0.311 2.22 0.436 

 Composite CO : 9.45 9.73 10.46 9.93 9.83 0.738 0.426 0.572 16.22 8.991 

 Composite NOX : 0.271 0.378 0.506 0.413 0.589 0.066 0.188 1.946 1.41 0.518 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Veh. Type: GasBUS URBAN SCHOOL 

 ------ ------ ------ 

 VMT Mix: 0.0001 0.0010 0.0019 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Composite Emission Factors (g/mi): 

 Composite VOC : 0.939 0.275 0.449 

 Composite CO : 17.83 0.806 1.044 

 Composite NOX : 2.152 2.876 4.709 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

64 

 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

65 

APPENDIX D

Air Quality Impact Summary for the OKI Portion of the 

Nonattainment Area and Emissions by State/County 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

66 

 

2005 Output Report (R7803)

 DAILY AIR QUALITY IMPACT FOR OKI REGION SUMMARY 10-OCT-08

 County or Network Network Vehicle VOC CO NOX PM Summer 

 Township Road Miles Lane Miles Miles (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) VMT 

==================================================================================================================== 

Boone County 233.66 613.11 3900873. 4.304 46.921 10.214 0.176 4162762. 

Butler County 580.75 1441.60 7421978. 9.898 102.823 18.802 0.332 7774168. 

Campbell County 198.42 509.82 2276611. 2.511 27.384 5.958 0.103 2428092. 

Clermont County 427.95 983.82 5051723. 6.824 69.986 12.963 0.226 5359970. 

Dearborn County 147.07 348.94 1323712. 2.360 20.456 3.399 0.060 1412377. 

Hamilton County 1061.67 3076.64 21783578. 29.404 301.786 55.854 0.975 23094892. 

Kenton County 239.03 592.36 3908394. 4.304 47.012 10.214 0.176 4162693. 

Warren County 397.32 979.42 5853879. 7.935 81.099 15.074 0.262 6232673. 

Montgomery Cnty 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Greene County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Miami County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Clark County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Preble County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Clinton County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Lawrenceburg Twp 25.15 69.78 575202. 0.997 8.889 1.435 0.026 596322. 

 State 

==================================================================================================================== 

IN Not AQ Region 147.07 348.94 1323712. 2.360 20.456 3.399 0.060 1412377. 

KY - OKI Only 671.11 1715.29 10085878. 11.119 121.317 26.386 0.455 10753546. 

OH - OKI Only 2467.69 6481.48 40111160. 54.061 555.693 102.692 1.795 42461700. 

OH - MVRPC Only 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

OH - Other 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

IN NonAttainment 25.15 69.78 575202. 0.997 8.889 1.435 0.026 596322. 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Region 3311.01 8615.49 52095952. 68.536 706.355 133.912 2.335 55223952. 

OKI OH+IN AQ Reg 2492.84 6551.26 40686360. 55.057 564.582 104.127 1.821 43058024. 

 Intra-Zonal VMT 

==================================================================================================================== 

Boone County 23244. 0.024 0.280 0.057 0.001 

Butler County 30308. 0.039 0.420 0.073 0.001 

Campbell County 9606. 0.010 0.116 0.024 0.000 

Clermont County 31608. 0.040 0.438 0.076 0.001 

Dearborn County 16428. 0.027 0.254 0.040 0.001 

Hamilton County 46049. 0.059 0.638 0.111 0.002 

Kenton County 11183. 0.012 0.135 0.027 0.001 

Warren County 30337. 0.039 0.420 0.073 0.001 

Montgomery Cnty 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Greene County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Miami County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Clark County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Preble County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Clinton County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Lawrenceburg Twp 3439. 0.004 0.048 0.008 0.000 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Total Intra-Zonal 202202. 0.253 2.747 0.490 0.009 

OKI OH+IN AQ Region IZ 141741. 0.180 1.964 0.343 0.006 

* Note: VMT reflects yearly average daily VMT. Emissions for CO are based on yearly average daily VMT.

 Emissions for VOC and NOX include a factor to represent summer travel. 

 

 Transit VMT 

==================================================================================================================== 

IN Not AQ Region 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

KY - OKI Only 8166. 0.005 0.040 0.148 0.005 

OH - OKI Only 29825. 0.009 0.149 0.544 0.019 

OH - MVRPC Only 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

OH - Other 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

IN NonAttainment 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Total Transit 37992. 0.014 0.190 0.692 0.024 

OKI OH+IN AQ Region 29825. 0.009 0.149 0.544 0.019 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Grand Totals 

==================================================================================================================== 

IN Not AQ Region 1340140. 2.388 20.710 3.438 0.060 

KY - OKI Only 10138077. 11.170 121.887 26.643 0.462 

OH - OKI Only 40279288. 54.246 557.758 103.571 1.820 

OH - MVRPC Only 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

OH - Other 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

IN NonAttainment 578641. 1.001 8.936 1.443 0.026 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Grand Total 52133944. 68.550 706.544 134.604 2.360 

OKI OH+IN AQ Region 40857928. 55.247 566.695 105.014 1.846 

==================================================================================================================== 

==================================================================================================================== 

* Note: VMT reflects yearly average daily VMT. Emissions for CO are based on yearly average daily VMT.

 Emissions for VOC and NOX include a factor to represent summer travel. 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

67 

2008 Output Report (R7803)

 DAILY AIR QUALITY IMPACT FOR OKI REGION SUMMARY 30-SEP-09

 County or Network Network Vehicle VOC CO NOX PM Summer 

 Township Road Miles Lane Miles Miles (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) VMT 

==================================================================================================================== 

Boone County 236.45 639.31 4051620. 3.981 44.192 8.478 0.138 4330563. 

Butler County 567.07 1473.35 7714861. 7.842 84.234 15.988 0.260 8102730. 

Campbell County 191.02 506.98 2329601. 2.285 25.410 4.865 0.079 2485233. 

Clermont County 416.74 972.04 5230069. 5.388 57.104 10.985 0.176 5567110. 

Dearborn County 144.53 342.91 1334278. 1.749 15.804 2.655 0.045 1423366. 

Hamilton County 1019.54 3042.53 22044516. 22.649 240.691 46.174 0.744 23401434. 

Kenton County 223.19 587.32 3904860. 3.838 42.592 8.173 0.133 4174555. 

Warren County 387.13 987.90 6025856. 6.226 65.793 12.693 0.203 6432735. 

Montgomery Cnty 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Greene County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Miami County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Clark County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Preble County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Clinton County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Lawrenceburg Twp 24.16 68.73 584186. 0.749 6.919 1.137 0.020 609631. 

 State 

==================================================================================================================== 

IN Not AQ Region 144.53 342.91 1334278. 1.749 15.804 2.655 0.045 1423366. 

KY - OKI Only 650.65 1733.61 10286081. 10.104 112.194 21.516 0.349 10990352. 

OH - OKI Only 2390.48 6475.82 41015308. 42.104 447.821 85.839 1.383 43504008. 

OH - MVRPC Only 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

OH - Other 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

IN NonAttainment 24.16 68.73 584186. 0.749 6.919 1.137 0.020 609631. 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Region 3209.81 8621.07 53219848. 54.707 582.738 111.147 1.798 56527368. 

OKI OH+IN AQ Reg 2414.64 6544.55 41599492. 42.854 454.740 86.976 1.403 44113640. 

 Intra-Zonal VMT 

==================================================================================================================== 

Boone County 24964. 0.023 0.272 0.049 0.001 

Butler County 30824. 0.030 0.337 0.061 0.001 

Campbell County 9941. 0.009 0.108 0.019 0.000 

Clermont County 32420. 0.031 0.354 0.064 0.001 

Dearborn County 16853. 0.021 0.200 0.031 0.001 

Hamilton County 46026. 0.045 0.503 0.091 0.002 

Kenton County 11097. 0.010 0.121 0.022 0.000 

Warren County 31482. 0.030 0.344 0.062 0.001 

Montgomery Cnty 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Greene County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Miami County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Clark County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Preble County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Clinton County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Lawrenceburg Twp 3396. 0.003 0.037 0.007 0.000 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Total Intra-Zonal 207003. 0.203 2.275 0.406 0.007 

OKI OH+IN AQ Region IZ 144148. 0.140 1.574 0.284 0.005 

* Note: VMT reflects yearly average daily VMT. Emissions for CO are based on yearly average daily VMT.

 Emissions for VOC and NOX include a factor to represent summer travel. 

 

 Transit VMT 

==================================================================================================================== 

IN Not AQ Region 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

KY - OKI Only 11375. 0.005 0.045 0.176 0.004 

OH - OKI Only 33961. 0.007 0.141 0.531 0.011 

OH - MVRPC Only 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

OH - Other 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

IN NonAttainment 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Total Transit 45336. 0.011 0.186 0.708 0.014 

OKI OH+IN AQ Region 33961. 0.007 0.141 0.531 0.011 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Grand Totals 

==================================================================================================================== 

IN Not AQ Region 1351131. 1.770 16.003 2.686 0.046 

KY - OKI Only 10343458. 10.151 112.741 21.782 0.354 

OH - OKI Only 41190020. 42.247 449.499 86.648 1.399 

OH - MVRPC Only 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

OH - Other 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

IN NonAttainment 587582. 0.753 6.956 1.144 0.020 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Grand Total 53265184. 54.718 582.924 111.855 1.812 

OKI OH+IN AQ Region 41777604. 43.000 456.455 87.792 1.419 

==================================================================================================================== 

==================================================================================================================== 

* Note: VMT reflects yearly average daily VMT. Emissions for CO are based on yearly average daily VMT.

 Emissions for VOC and NOX include a factor to represent summer travel. 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

68 

2015 Output Report (R7803)

 DAILY AIR QUALITY IMPACT FOR OKI REGION SUMMARY 15-SEP-09

 County or Network Network Vehicle VOC CO NOX PM Summer 

 Township Road Miles Lane Miles Miles (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) VMT 

==================================================================================================================== 

Boone County 243.53 743.15 4798837. 3.152 37.193 4.609 0.092 5105800. 

Butler County 586.21 1539.89 8425674. 4.851 64.243 7.520 0.160 8836953. 

Campbell County 197.16 550.67 2620037. 1.728 20.306 2.527 0.050 2798785. 

Clermont County 424.04 989.87 5618901. 3.272 42.842 5.072 0.107 5960298. 

Dearborn County 152.37 367.83 1488387. 1.177 12.543 1.408 0.028 1588928. 

Hamilton County 1041.80 3193.63 23005940. 13.411 175.413 20.789 0.436 24429772. 

Kenton County 232.28 631.62 4330736. 2.841 33.565 4.154 0.083 4601830. 

Warren County 393.28 1024.31 6849283. 4.000 52.224 6.201 0.130 7286355. 

Montgomery Cnty 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Greene County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Miami County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Clark County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Preble County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Clinton County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Lawrenceburg Twp 24.82 70.88 644037. 0.496 5.427 0.594 0.012 670198. 

 State 

==================================================================================================================== 

IN Not AQ Region 152.37 367.83 1488387. 1.177 12.543 1.408 0.028 1588928. 

KY - OKI Only 672.96 1925.44 11749610. 7.720 91.063 11.291 0.224 12506415. 

OH - OKI Only 2445.33 6747.70 43899792. 25.534 334.722 39.582 0.832 46513372. 

OH - MVRPC Only 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

OH - Other 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

IN NonAttainment 24.82 70.88 644037. 0.496 5.427 0.594 0.012 670198. 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Region 3295.48 9111.85 57781832. 34.927 443.756 52.875 1.097 61278912. 

OKI OH+IN AQ Reg 2470.15 6818.58 44543828. 26.030 340.149 40.176 0.845 47183568. 

 Intra-Zonal VMT 

==================================================================================================================== 

Boone County 27656. 0.017 0.214 0.025 0.001 

Butler County 32853. 0.018 0.250 0.028 0.001 

Campbell County 11141. 0.007 0.086 0.010 0.000 

Clermont County 35240. 0.019 0.269 0.030 0.001 

Dearborn County 18309. 0.014 0.154 0.016 0.000 

Hamilton County 46800. 0.026 0.357 0.040 0.001 

Kenton County 12048. 0.007 0.093 0.011 0.000 

Warren County 37749. 0.021 0.288 0.032 0.001 

Montgomery Cnty 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Greene County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Miami County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Clark County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Preble County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Clinton County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Lawrenceburg Twp 3434. 0.002 0.026 0.003 0.000 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Total Intra-Zonal 225230. 0.131 1.738 0.195 0.004 

OKI OH+IN AQ Region IZ 156076. 0.086 1.190 0.133 0.003 

* Note: VMT reflects yearly average daily VMT. Emissions for CO are based on yearly average daily VMT.

 Emissions for VOC and NOX include a factor to represent summer travel. 

 

 Transit VMT 

==================================================================================================================== 

IN Not AQ Region 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

KY - OKI Only 9160. 0.003 0.019 0.067 0.001 

OH - OKI Only 39966. 0.006 0.075 0.285 0.004 

OH - MVRPC Only 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

OH - Other 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

IN NonAttainment 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Total Transit 49127. 0.009 0.094 0.352 0.005 

OKI OH+IN AQ Region 39966. 0.006 0.075 0.285 0.004 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Grand Totals 

==================================================================================================================== 

IN Not AQ Region 1506696. 1.191 12.697 1.424 0.029 

KY - OKI Only 11809615. 7.755 91.476 11.404 0.226 

OH - OKI Only 44092400. 25.623 335.960 39.997 0.839 

OH - MVRPC Only 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

OH - Other 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

IN NonAttainment 647471. 0.498 5.454 0.597 0.012 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Grand Total 57830960. 34.936 443.849 53.227 1.102 

OKI OH+IN AQ Region 44739872. 26.122 341.414 40.594 0.852 

==================================================================================================================== 

==================================================================================================================== 

* Note: VMT reflects yearly average daily VMT. Emissions for CO are based on yearly average daily VMT.

 Emissions for VOC and NOX include a factor to represent summer travel. 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

69 

2020 Output Report (R7803)

 DAILY AIR QUALITY IMPACT FOR OKI REGION SUMMARY 16-SEP-09

 County or Network Network Vehicle VOC CO NOX PM Summer 

 Township Road Miles Lane Miles Miles (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) (Tons/Day) VMT 

==================================================================================================================== 

Boone County 243.53 743.15 5412408. 2.945 37.981 3.434 0.085 5757894. 

Butler County 586.21 1539.89 9042376. 4.486 63.991 5.354 0.143 9485722. 

Campbell County 197.16 550.67 2833751. 1.548 19.885 1.805 0.045 3027410. 

Clermont County 424.04 989.87 6030235. 3.025 42.675 3.611 0.095 6397591. 

Dearborn County 152.37 367.83 1640862. 1.026 12.473 1.031 0.026 1752277. 

Hamilton County 1041.80 3193.63 23837298. 11.974 168.692 14.290 0.376 25320182. 

Kenton County 232.28 631.62 4683779. 2.545 32.868 2.967 0.074 4976098. 

Warren County 393.28 1024.31 7672745. 3.862 54.299 4.609 0.121 8165845. 

Montgomery Cnty 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Greene County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Miami County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Clark County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Preble County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Clinton County 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

Lawrenceburg Twp 24.82 70.88 683890. 0.417 5.199 0.419 0.011 712313. 

 State 

==================================================================================================================== 

IN Not AQ Region 152.37 367.83 1640862. 1.026 12.473 1.031 0.026 1752277. 

KY - OKI Only 672.96 1925.44 12929937. 7.039 90.733 8.207 0.204 13761400. 

OH - OKI Only 2445.33 6747.70 46582656. 23.346 329.658 27.863 0.734 49369340. 

OH - MVRPC Only 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

OH - Other 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 

IN NonAttainment 24.82 70.88 683890. 0.417 5.199 0.419 0.011 712313. 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Region 3295.48 9111.85 61837348. 31.827 438.063 37.521 0.975 65595328. 

OKI OH+IN AQ Reg 2470.15 6818.58 47266544. 23.763 334.856 28.283 0.745 50081652. 

 Intra-Zonal VMT 

==================================================================================================================== 

Boone County 32337. 0.017 0.227 0.019 0.001 

Butler County 35277. 0.017 0.250 0.020 0.001 

Campbell County 11864. 0.006 0.083 0.007 0.000 

Clermont County 36963. 0.017 0.262 0.021 0.001 

Dearborn County 19281. 0.011 0.147 0.011 0.000 

Hamilton County 47824. 0.023 0.338 0.027 0.001 

Kenton County 12926. 0.007 0.091 0.008 0.000 

Warren County 43391. 0.021 0.307 0.024 0.001 

Montgomery Cnty 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Greene County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Miami County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Clark County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Preble County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Clinton County 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Lawrenceburg Twp 3610. 0.002 0.026 0.002 0.000 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Total Intra-Zonal 243473. 0.120 1.730 0.140 0.004 

OKI OH+IN AQ Region IZ 167065. 0.079 1.182 0.094 0.003 

* Note: VMT reflects yearly average daily VMT. Emissions for CO are based on yearly average daily VMT.

 Emissions for VOC and NOX include a factor to represent summer travel. 

 

 Transit VMT 

==================================================================================================================== 

IN Not AQ Region 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

KY - OKI Only 9160. 0.003 0.009 0.030 0.000 

OH - OKI Only 39966. 0.006 0.036 0.127 0.002 

OH - MVRPC Only 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

OH - Other 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

IN NonAttainment 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Total Transit 49127. 0.009 0.045 0.157 0.003 

OKI OH+IN AQ Region 39966. 0.006 0.036 0.127 0.002 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Grand Totals 

==================================================================================================================== 

IN Not AQ Region 1660143. 1.037 12.620 1.043 0.026 

KY - OKI Only 12996224. 7.071 91.144 8.271 0.205 

OH - OKI Only 46786076. 23.429 330.850 28.082 0.739 

OH - MVRPC Only 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

OH - Other 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

IN NonAttainment 687500. 0.419 5.224 0.421 0.011 

==================================================================================================================== 

 Grand Total 61886476. 31.836 438.107 37.677 0.977 

OKI OH+IN AQ Region 47473576. 23.848 336.074 28.504 0.750 

==================================================================================================================== 

==================================================================================================================== 

* Note: VMT reflects yearly average daily VMT. Emissions for CO are based on yearly average daily VMT.

 Emissions for VOC and NOX include a factor to represent summer travel. 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

70 

 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

71 

Appendix E 

Clinton County Air Quality Analyis (provided by ODOT) 

 

Clinton County 

OZONE YEAR 2005 

 

 VOC NOX 

 FUNCTIONAL HPMS ANNUAL 2005 POLLUTANT 2005 POLLUTANT 

 CLASSIFICATION 2005 GROWTH 2005 VOC EF BURDEN NOX EF BURDEN 

 VMT FACTOR VMT GM/MI TONS/DAY GM/MI TONS/DAY 

 

 RURAL 

0

1 INTERSTATE 554,300 1.000 554,300 1.418 0.865 3.156 1.924 

0

2 

PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL 0 1.000 0 1.461 0.000 2.452 0.000 

0

6 MINOR ARTERIAL 322,000 1.000 322,000 1.461 0.517 2.452 0.868 

0

7 MAJOR ARTERIAL 339,140 1.000 339,140 1.552 0.579 2.223 0.829 

0

8 

MINOR 

COLLECTOR 5,400 1.000 5,400 1.552 0.009 2.223 0.013

0

9 LOCAL 393,470 1.000 393,470 1.552 0.672 2.223 0.962 

 

 URBAN 

1

1 INTERSTATE 0 1.000 0 1.418 0.000 3.156 0.000 

1

2 

FREEWAY/EXPRE

SSWAY 0 1.000 0 1.418 0.000 3.156 0.000 

1

4 

PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL 140,870 1.000 140,870 1.753 0.272 2.174 0.337 

1

6 MINOR ARTERIAL 21,980 1.000 21,980 1.753 0.042 2.174 0.053 

1

7 COLLECTOR 23,940 1.000 23,940 1.753 0.046 2.175 0.057 

1

9 LOCAL 8,500 1.000 8,500 1.753 0.016 2.269 0.021 

 

 2005 TOTAL 

1,809,6

00 

1,809,6

00 3.019 5.065 

 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

72 

 

Clinton County 

OZONE YEAR 2008 

 

 VOC NOX 

 FUNCTIONAL HPMS ANNUAL 2008 POLLUTANT 2008 POLLUTANT 

 CLASSIFICATION 2008 GROWTH 2008 VOC EF BURDEN NOX EF BURDEN 

 VMT FACTOR VMT GM/MI TONS/DAY GM/MI TONS/DAY 

 

 RURAL 

0

1 INTERSTATE 553,330 1.000 553,330 1.108 0.674 2.414 1.469 

0

2 

PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL 0 1.000 0 1.139 0.000 1.899 0.000 

0

6 MINOR ARTERIAL 314,550 1.000 314,550 1.139 0.394 1.899 0.657 

0

7 MAJOR ARTERIAL 360,620 1.000 360,620 1.204 0.478 1.721 0.683 

0

8 

MINOR 

COLLECTOR 5,200 1.000 5,200 1.204 0.007 1.721 0.010

0

9 LOCAL 369,170 1.000 369,170 1.204 0.489 1.721 0.699 

 

 URBAN 

1

1 INTERSTATE 0 1.000 0 1.108 0.000 2.414 0.000 

1

2 

FREEWAY/EXPRE

SSWAY 0 1.000 0 1.108 0.000 2.414 0.000 

1

4 

PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL 134,360 1.000 134,360 1.349 0.199 1.682 0.249 

1

6 MINOR ARTERIAL 22,620 1.000 22,620 1.349 0.034 1.682 0.042 

1

7 COLLECTOR 25,240 1.000 25,240 1.350 0.037 1.684 0.047 

1

9 LOCAL 8,490 1.000 8,490 1.450 0.014 1.757 0.016 

 

 2005 TOTAL 

1,793,5

80 

1,793,5

80 2.326 3.871 

 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

73 

 

Clinton County 

OZONE YEAR 2015 

 

 VOC NOX 

 FUNCTIONAL HPMS ANNUAL 2015 POLLUTANT 2015 POLLUTANT 

 CLASSIFICATION 2008 GROWTH 2015 VOC EF BURDEN NOX EF BURDEN 

 VMT FACTOR VMT GM/MI TONS/DAY GM/MI TONS/DAY 

 

 RURAL 

0

1 INTERSTATE 553,330 1.014 607,786 0.622 0.416 1.072 0.717 

0

2 

PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL* 0 1.013 104,288 0.632 0.073 0.873 0.100 

0

6 MINOR ARTERIAL 314,550 1.008 331,901 0.632 0.231 0.873 0.319 

0

7 MAJOR ARTERIAL 360,620 1.014 396,110 0.662 0.288 0.799 0.348 

0

8 

MINOR 

COLLECTOR 5,200 1.009 5,540 0.662 0.004 0.799 0.005

0

9 LOCAL 369,170 1.012 401,319 0.662 0.292 0.799 0.353 

 

 URBAN 

1

1 INTERSTATE 0 0.000 0 0.622 0.000 1.072 0.000 

1

2 

FREEWAY/EXPRE

SSWAY 0 0.000 0 0.622 0.000 1.072 0.000 

1

4 

PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL 134,360 1.008 142,462 0.735 0.115 0.784 0.123 

1

6 MINOR ARTERIAL 22,620 1.010 24,201 0.735 0.020 0.784 0.021 

1

7 COLLECTOR 25,240 1.009 26,874 0.735 0.022 0.785 0.023 

1

9 LOCAL 8,490 1.009 9,014 0.789 0.008 0.819 0.008 

 

 2005 TOTAL 

1,793,5

80 

2,049,4

96 1.468 2.016 

 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

74 

 

Clinton County 

OZONE YEAR 2020 

 

 VOC NOX 

 FUNCTIONAL HPMS ANNUAL 2020 POLLUTANT 2020 POLLUTANT 

 CLASSIFICATION 2008 GROWTH 2020 VOC EF BURDEN NOX EF BURDEN 

 VMT FACTOR VMT GM/MI TONS/DAY GM/MI TONS/DAY 

 

 RURAL 

0

1 INTERSTATE 553,330 1.014 649,934 0.486 0.347 0.687 0.491 

0

2 

PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL* 0 1.013 111,269 0.493 0.060 0.578 0.071 

0

6 MINOR ARTERIAL 314,550 1.008 344,877 0.493 0.187 0.578 0.219 

0

7 MAJOR ARTERIAL 360,620 1.014 423,579 0.517 0.241 0.535 0.249 

0

8 

MINOR 

COLLECTOR 5,200 1.009 5,797 0.517 0.003 0.535 0.003

0

9 LOCAL 369,170 1.012 425,983 0.517 0.242 0.535 0.251 

 

 URBAN 

1

1 INTERSTATE 0 0.000 0 0.486 0.000 0.687 0.000 

1

2 

FREEWAY/EXPRE

SSWAY 0 0.000 0 0.486 0.000 0.687 0.000 

1

4 

PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL 134,360 1.008 148,547 0.577 0.094 0.527 0.086 

1

6 MINOR ARTERIAL 22,620 1.010 25,398 0.577 0.016 0.527 0.015 

1

7 COLLECTOR 25,240 1.009 28,105 0.578 0.018 0.528 0.016 

1

9 LOCAL 8,490 1.009 9,409 0.622 0.006 0.551 0.006 

 

 2005 TOTAL 

1,793,5

80 

2,172,8

99 1.216 1.407 

*VMT due to new facilities estimated with the Ohio Statewide Travel Demand 

Model 
Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Cincinnati 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, October 2009 

75 
APPENDIX G 

Indiana Department of Environmental 

Management (IDEM) – Area Source Inventory 

Standard Operating Procedure 
This page left intentionally blank.
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

Standard Operating Procedure 

Office: Office of Air Quality

Branch: Air Programs Branch

Section: Technical Support and Modeling Section

Revised: 02/27/2008 Revision Cycle: 2 years

Effective date: 02/15/07

Scope of operations 

This SOP is to identify source categories and develop emissions not calculated in point source 

inventories. This data is compiled every three years as mandated by EPA. 

Scope of applicability 

This SOP is for the Senior Environmental Manager and the Environmental Manager in the Emissions 

Group. 

Authorized Signatures 

I approve and authorize this Standard Operating Procedure: 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

Table of Contents

Scope of operations....................................................................................................................................1

Scope of applicability .................................................................................................................................1

Authorized Signatures................................................................................................................................1

1. Overview work flow chart.......................................................................................................................3

2. Definitions................................................................................................................................................3

3. Roles.........................................................................................................................................................4

Responsibilities: .........................................................................................................................................4

4. Description of equipment, forms, and/or software to be used...........................................................4

5. Procedure ................................................................................................................................................4

5.1 Procedural Flowchart ....................................................................................................................4

5.2 Procedure .......................................................................................................................................5

6. Standards and checklists.....................................................................................................................24

7. Records Management...........................................................................................................................24

8. Quality Assurance / Quality Control ...................................................................................................25

9. Continuous Improvement Cycle..........................................................................................................25

10. References...........................................................................................................................................25

11. History of Revisions ...........................................................................................................................25

12. Appendices..........................................................................................................................................25

2 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

1. Overview work flow chart 

The process described is not part of a larger system and does not need an Overview work flow chart.

2. Definitions 

AP-42 – Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume I: Stationary Point 

and Area Sources (January 1995) plus Supplements A – F (Updates 2001 – 2004). AP-42 can be 

obtained at www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/.

Area Sources - A collection of similar emission units within a geographic area that collectively represent 

individual sources that are small and numerous and have not been inventoried as a specific point, mobile, 

or biogenic source.

Authorized - Established by official authority and usage; as with a policy, standard operating procedure 

(SOP), or quality assurance project plan (QAPP) that is signed and dated. 

EIIP (Emission Inventory Improvement Program) -The EIIP is an EPA program established in 1993 to 

promote the development and use of standard procedures for collecting, calculating, storing, reporting, 

and sharing air emissions date. 

Emission Factors - An emission factor is the estimate of the quantity of pollutant released to the 

atmosphere (because of some operation or activity such as combustion or industrial production) divided 

by the level of that activity. 

Process - The term “process” used when describing area sources is used to name an operation or 

activity that produces emissions.

NEI - National Emission Inventory Air Pollutant Emission Trends, U.S. EPA.

Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code - A Standard Industrial Classification code from the 

series of codes devised by the United States Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to classify 

establishments according to the type of economic activity in which they engage. 

Source Classification Code (SCC) - Source Classification Code is a process-level code that describes 

the equipment or operation emitting pollutants.

3 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

3. Roles 

Title # of Staff Experience Qualifications Location 

Senior Environmental Manager 1 N/A 

MS ACCESS, Emission 

Inventories and familiarity 

with the EIIP 

Air Programs 

Branch 

Environmental Manager 1 N/A 

MS ACCESS, Emission 

Inventories and familiarity 

with the EIIP 

Air Programs 

Branch 

 Responsibilities: 

Senior Environmental Manager

Oversees work of the Environmental Manager and ensures that all goals are met. The Senior 

Environmental Manager also does the final upload to the NEI. 

Environmental Manager 

The Environmental Manager calculates the Area Source Emissions using the EIIP or other EPA 

guidance as provided. The Environmental Manager is also responsible for updating the SOP for 

the Emissions Group. 

4. Description of equipment, forms, and/or software to be used 

Equipment, Form, &/or Software Who uses it? Location 

AP42 Senior Environmental Manager and 

Environmental Manager 

EPA’s website: 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/index.

html 

Emission Inventory Improvement 

Program (EIIP) 

Senior Environmental Manager and 

Environmental Manager 

EPA’s website: 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techrep

ort/ 

National Emission Inventory (NEI) Air 

Pollutant Emission Trends, U.S. EPA 

Senior Environmental Manager and 

Environmental Manager 

EPA’s website 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/trends/ 

5. Procedure 

5.1 Procedural Flowchart 

The procedural flowchart below titled “Area Source Inventory” is used to calculate non-point source 

inventories. This data is compiled every three years as mandated by EPA. The guidance followed is 

located in the EIIP. Emissions from area sources are calculated at the county level and consist of 

individual sources that are small, numerous and that have not been inventoried as specific point, mobile, 

or biogenic sources according to the EIIP. 

YES

 NO

Identify 

Categories

Is the category

an Area 

Source?

Then calculate emissions using the SOP for 

Receiving Emission Statements or the SOP 

for On-Road Mobile Source Inventory

Calculate Area Source 

categories using the 

EIIP or other EPA 

guidance as provided

Enter data into

NEI 

4 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

5.2 Procedure 

Category 1: Stationary Fuel Combustion 

Sub-Category 1.1: Industrial Fuel Combustion 

SCC: 2102002000, 210200400, 2102005000, 2102006000, 2102007000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from industrial fuel combustion: 

1. Obtain statewide fuel consumption for “Other Industrial” for the following fuels: coal, distillate oil, 

natural gas, and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). Use the Energy Information Administration’s website 

at http://www.eia.doe.gov/ to find fuel consumption. 

Note: As of the date of this SOP, the following steps will lead to data for fuel consumption. 

a. Go to http://www.eia.doe.gov/

b. Click on link for the various types of fuel consumption 

c. Click on consumption tab for state totals 

2. To avoid double calculating the various fuel combustions, subtract reported source totals from the 

total statewide fuel consumption by querying the total process rates for the various SCC codes using 

the ACCESS data tables at K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb. The remaining number is the area 

source fuel consumption for the state. 

3. To distribute the remaining fuel to the county level, calculate the ratio of county to state employment 

for the manufacturing sector by dividing the number of Manufacturing Employees for each county by 

the number of manufacturing employees statewide. Use the County Business Patterns website at 

http://www.census.gov/ to find the number of manufacturing employees for each county. 

Note: As of the date of this SOP, the following steps will lead to data for Economic Census. 

a. Go to http://www.census.gov/

b. Click on Economic Census 

c. Under 2002 Reports by State, use the down arrow key to select Indiana 

d. Now, select each of the counties to find the county manufacturing employees 

e. Use the total of employees for manufacturing under the paid employees’ column 

4. Multiply the ratio calculated above in step 3 by the area source fuel consumption to distribute the fuel 

to the county level. The remaining number is the process rate for each county. Multiply the process 

rate by the appropriate EPA emission factors for the various fuels for industrial manufacturing found 

in AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 1, External Combustion Sources at 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/. 

Sub-Category 1.2: Commercial/Institutional Fuel Combustion 

SCC: 2103004000, 2103005000, 2103006000, 2103007000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from commercial/institutional fuel combustion: 

1. Obtain statewide fuel consumption for “Commercial” for the following fuels: distillate fuel oil, liquefied 

petroleum gas (LPG), natural gas, and residual fuel oil. Use the Energy Information Administration’s 

website at http://www.eia.doe.gov/ to find fuel consumption. 

Note: Use the steps in sub-category 1.1-1 to navigate through the Energy Information 

Administration’s website. 

5 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

2. To avoid double calculating the various fuel combustions, subtract reported source totals from the 

total statewide fuel consumption by querying the total process rates for the various fuels using the 

SIC codes greater than 4999 using the ACCESS data tables at K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb. 

These are the SIC codes that identify all the commercial/institutional area sources. 

3. To distribute the remaining fuel to the county level, calculate the ratio of county to state employment 

for the commercial/institutional sector by dividing the number of commercial/institutional employees 

for each county by the number of commercial/institutional employees statewide. Use the County 

Business Patterns website at http://www.census.gov/ to find the number of commercial/institutional 

employees for each county. 

Note: Use the steps in sub-category 1.1-3 to navigate through the U.S. Census Bureau’s website. 

4. Multiply the ratio calculated above in step 3 by the area source fuel consumption to distribute the fuel 

to the county level. The remaining number is the process rate for each county. Multiply the process 

rate by the appropriate EPA emission factors for the various fuels for commercial/institutional found in 

AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 1, External Combustion Sources at 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/. 

Sub-Category 1.3: Residential Fuel Combustion 

SCC: 2104002000, 2104004000, 2104006000, 2104007000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from residential fuel combustion: 

1. Obtain statewide fuel consumption for “Residential” for the following fuels: coal, distillate oil, natural 

gas, and liquid petroleum gas. Use the Energy Information Administration’s website at 

http://www.eia.doe.gov/ to find fuel consumption. 

Note: Use the steps in sub-category 1.1-1 to navigate through the Energy Information 

Administration’s website. 

2. To distribute residential fuel to the county level, calculate the ratio of county fuel usage to statewide 

fuel usage using the breakdown of fuels by household per county divided by the breakdown of fuels 

by household per state using the U.S. Census Bureau’s website at http://www.census.gov/ . 

Note: As of the date of this SOP, the following steps will lead to data for breakdown of fuels by 

household. 

a. Go to http://www.census.gov/

b. On the left hand side click on “American Fact Finder” 

c. Using the drop down menu, click on Indiana 

d. Scroll to “Housing Characteristics” and select “show more” 

e. On the left hand side, select “change geography (state, county, place...)” 

f. Using the drop down menu, select county, state, and each county name to obtain housing 

information 

3. Multiply the ratio calculated above in step 3 by the area residential fuel use by state to distribute the 

fuel to the county level. The remaining number is the process rate for each county for the various 

fuels. Multiply the process rate by the appropriate EPA emission factors for the various fuels for 

residential found in AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 1 External Combustion Sources at 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/. 

6 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

Sub-Category 1.4: Residential Heating Using Wood 

SCC: 2104008001, 2104008002, 2104008003, 2104008004, 2104008010, 2104008030, 2104008050 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from residential heating using wood: 

1. Obtain statewide wood consumption for “Residential” using the Energy Information Administration’s 

website at http://www.eia.doe.gov/. To convert the statewide wood consumption from cords of wood 

consumed to tons, multiply the total cords consumed by 1.25. 

Note: As of the date of this SOP, the following steps will lead to data for wood consumption. 

a. Go to http://www.eia.doe.gov/

b. Click on Households, Buildings & Industry 

c. Under Consumption Summaries, click on “Annual” 

d. Now, over to the right click on “State Energy” 

e. Using the drop down menu at the bottom, select “Indiana” 

f. Under “Consumption” click on the “Residential” document 

2. Using the ratio estimates provided by EPA found in the “Documentation For The Final 2002 

NONPOINT SECTOR (FEB 06 version) NATIONAL EMISSIONS INVENTORY FOR CRITERIA AND 

HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS” at 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2002inventory.html#documentaiton the number calculated above in 

step 1 is broken out into three categories (fireplace without inserts, fireplaces with inserts and 

woodstoves). 

3. To distribute to the county level for the three categories above, calculate a ratio of county to state 

using the statewide total of households and the county total of households that burn wood found at 

the U.S. Census Bureau website http://www.census.gov/. The remaining number is the process rate 

for each county. Multiply the process rate by the appropriate EPA emission factors for each of the 

categories using the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 2, Residential Wood Combustion at 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii02_apr2001.pdf. 

Note: Use the steps in sub-category 1.3-2 to navigate through the Energy Information 

Administration’s website. 

Category 2: Industrial Processes 

Sub-Category 2.1: Bakeries 

SCC: 2302050000

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from bakeries: 

1. Calculate a per capita consumption factor using the reported weight of yeast–raised product reported 

under the Bread, Cake, and Frozen Bakery Products from the Economic Census Bureau at 

http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/ and the U.S. population at the U.S. Census Bureau at 

http://census,gov/. 

Note: As of the date of this SOP, the following steps will lead to data for yeast-raised product. 

a. Go to http://www.census.gov

b. Under Business & Industry open “Economic Census” 

c. Now open “Subject Series” 

d. Under Manufacturing, open the table “Product Summary” 

e. Use the yeast – raised product under Commercial Bakeries (NAICS code 311812) and Frozen cakes, 

pies, and other pastries manufacturing (NAICS code 311813) 

7 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

2. Multiply the per capita consumption factor calculated above in step 1 by the Indiana population found 

at the U.S. Census Bureau at http://www.census.gov. 

 Note: As of the date of this SOP, the following steps will lead to Indiana population data. 

 a. Go to http://www.census.gov

 b. Under Population Finder, use the drop down menu to select Indiana 

3. To avoid double calculating the amount consumed for the state, subtract the reported process rate for 

both the straight-dough and sponge-dough by querying the total process rates for the SCC 30203202 

(straight-dough) and SCC 30203201 (sponge-dough) using the ACCESS data tables at 

K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb. 

4. Multiply the remaining process rate by the straight-dough emission factor of .5 lbs VOC/1,000 pounds 

baked found in the EIIP, Volume 3, Area Source Method Abstracts: Baked Goods at Commercial/Retail 

Bakeries at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/index.html. 

5. Calculate a per capita factor by dividing the Indiana population found in step 2 by the remaining process 

rate. Now multiply the per capita factor by each of the county populations to calculate the VOC emissions 

for each county. 

 Note: As of the date of this SOP, the following steps will lead to county population data. 

 a. Go to http://www.census.gov

 b. Under Population Finder, use the drop down menu to select Indiana 

 c. Under “View more results”, select the county table 

Category 3: Solvent Utilization 

Sub-Category 3.1: Architectural Coatings 

SCC: 2401001000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from architectural coatings: 

1. Calculate an emission factor for architectural coating area sources first by adding all the solventbased paints together and all the water based paints together using the U.S. Census Bureau’s 

website http://www.census.gov. Use Table 1 to select all solvent-based paints and Table 2 to select 

all water based paints. 

Table 1 

National Solvent Coating Sales 

Solvent Type 1,000 gallons 

Exterior Solvent Type XX 

Interior Solvent Type XX 

Architectural Lacquers XX 

Architectural Coating 

N.S.K. XX 

Total Solvents XX 

Table 2 

National Water Based Coating Sales 

Water Type 1,000 gallons 

Exterior Water Type XX 

Interior Water Type XX 

Total Water Type XX 

8 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

Note: As of the date of this SOP, the following steps will lead to architectural coating data. 

 a. Go to http://www.census.gov

 b. Under Business & Industry, select more 

 c. Now select Current Industrial Reports (CIR) 

 d. Select CIRs by Subject 

 e. Tab down to find the report “Paints and Allied Products” 

2. Now multiply the total national number for solvent-based paints by the average solvent-based coating 

content number (3.87 lbs VOC/gallon) and the total national number for water-based paints by the 

average water-based coating content number (0.74 lbs VOC/gal) found in the EIIP, Volume 3, 

Chapter 3: Architectural Surface Coating at 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/archsfc.pdf. 

3. Add the total solvent-based coatings and the water-based paints together for a total national VOC 

emission factor from architectural surface coating. Then divide this number by the total national 

population using the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov. 

4. Multiply the number calculated above in step 3 by each of the county populations to calculate the total 

emissions per county. 

Note: Use the steps in sub-category 2.1-5 to navigate through the Census Bureau’s website. 

Sub-Category 3.2: Automobile Refinishing 

SCC: 2401005000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from automobile refinishing: 

1. To avoid double calculating, first query the employees from the reported sources using the SIC 7532- 

Body Repair and Paint Shops using the ACCESS data tables at K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb. 

Subtract this number from the county employment for the same SIC using the U.S. Census Bureau’s 

website http://www.census.gov. 

 Note: As of the date of this SOP, the following steps will lead to county employment data. 

 a. Go to http://www.census.gov

 b. Under Business & Industry, select more 

 c. Now select the County Business Patterns report for county 

 d. Select Indiana 

 e. Select each of the counties to find the number of employees for the corresponding SIC or NAICS 

code 

2. Multiply the emission factor 3,519 lbs VOC/employee found in the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 13 Auto 

Body Refinishing at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/archsfc.pdf and the county 

employment found above in step 1 to calculate the VOC emissions for each county. 

Sub-Category 3.3: Traffic Markings 

SCC: 2401008000 

Follow these steps when calculating for traffic markings: 

1. First calculate the national emissions by finding the amount of sales for traffic marking paints from the 

U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov and multiply 3.36 lb VOC/gallon the national 

average VOC content for water and solvent-based paints from the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 14, Traffic 

Markings at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii14.pdf. 

9 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

 Note: As of the date of this SOP, the following steps will lead to traffic marking paints. 

 

 a. Go to http://www.census.gov

 b. Under Business & Industry, select more 

 c. Now select Current Industrial Reports (CIR) 

 d. Select CIRs by Subject 

 e. Tab down to find the report “Paints and Allied Products” 

f. Use the quantity amount in 1000/gallons under “Traffic marking paints (all types: shelf goods and 

highway department) 

2. Allocate the national emissions calculated above in step 1 to the state level by dividing the amount of 

money spent in Indiana by the money spent nationally on highway maintenance using the category “Total 

Disbursements” at the Federal Highway Administration’s website 

http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohim/hs04/htm/sf2.htm. 

3. Calculate the emission factor for Indiana by dividing the state level emissions by the total number of 

roadway miles in Indiana, given by contacting the Program Development Division, Highway Statistics, 

Indiana Department of Transportation or the Office of Air Quality, Technical Support and Modeling 

Section’s mobile inventory preparer. 

4. Multiply the emission factor by the total number of roadway miles in each county using the information 

supplied from above in step 3. 

Sub-Category 3.4: Industrial Surface Coating (employment based emission factor) 

SCC: 2401015000, 2401020000, 2401030000, 2401040000, 2401045000, 2401055000, 2401060000, 

2401065000, 2401070000, 2401075000, 2401080000

Follow these steps when calculating for industrial surface coating using the employment based 

emission factor: 

1. Calculate an employee based emission factor for the following SIC’s in the table below running a query 

to find the point source employment for each of the SIC’s and the reported VOC emissions for each 

using the ACCESS data tables at K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb. 

SCC Description SIC’s 

2401015000 Factory Finished Wood 2426-2429,243-245, 2492, 2499 

2401020000 Wood Furniture 25 

2401030000 Paper Coating 26 

2401040000 Metal Cans * 341 

2401045000 Metal Coils * 3479 

2401055000 Machinery and Equipment 35 

2401060000 Appliances * 363 

2401065000 Electronic and Other Electrical 3612, 3357 

2401070000 New Motor Vehicles ** 3711 

2401075000 Other Transportation 37 (not 3711, 373) 

2401080000 Marine Coatings 373 

10 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

* Use the National default emission factor because the reporting sources are low. 

** Emissions reported in point source 

2. Divide the reported VOC emissions for each of the SIC’s by the reported employment for each SIC. 

Use this number for the emission factor. 

3. Subtract the number of reported employees found in step 1 from each of the SIC county totals using 

the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov. Use the remaining number for the process 

rate for each of the counties. 

 Note: Use the steps in sub-category 3.2-1 to navigate through the County Business Patterns. 

4. Multiply the process rates above found for each of the SIC’s in step 4 by the emission factors found in 

step 3 to allocate the emissions to each of the counties. 

Sub-Category 3.5: Industrial Surface Coating (default emission factor) 

SCC: 2401090000, 2401100000, 2401200000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from industrial surface coating using the default emission 

factor: 

1. Calculate industrial surface coating emissions using the default emission factor in the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 

8, Industrial Surface Coating at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii08.pdf and multiply by 

the county populations found at the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov. 

 Note: Use the steps in 2.1-5 to navigate through U.S. Census Bureau’s website. 

SCC’s Description Default Emission Factor 

24-01-090-000 Miscellaneous Manufacturing 0.600 lbs VOC/person 

24-01-100-000 Industrial Maintenance Coatings 0.800 lbs VOC/person 

24-01-200-000 Other Special Purpose Coatings 0.800 lbs VOC/person 

Sub-Category 3.6: Degreasing 

SCC: 2415230000, 2415245000, 2415345000, 2415360000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from degreasing activities: 

1. Use the U.S. Census Bureau to find employment numbers for each of the counties for the categories 

in Table 1 below at http://www.census.gov. 

Note: Use the steps in 2.1-5 to navigate through U.S. Census Bureau’s website. 

Source Classification Codes and Industries Associated with Degreasing 

SCC SIC Description 

2415230000 36 Electronic and other electronic equipment 

25 Furniture and fixtures 

33 Primary metal industries 

34 Fabricated metal products 

35 Industrial machinery and equipment 

37 Transportation equipment 

38 Instruments and related products 

11 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

39 Miscellaneous manufacturing industries 

417 Bus Terminal and Service Facilities 

423 Trucking terminal facilities 

551 New and used car dealers 

552 Used car dealers 

554 Gasoline service stations 

555 Boat dealers 

556 Recreational vehicle dealers 

2415245000 

753 Automotive repair shops 

25 Furniture and fixtures 

33 Primary metal industries 

34 Fabricated metal products 

35 Industrial machinery and equipment 

36 Electronic and other electronic equipment 

37 Transportation equipment 

38 Instruments and related products 

2415345000 

2415345000 cont. 

39 Miscellaneous manufacturing industries 

417 Bus Terminal and Service Facilities 

423 Trucking terminal facilities 

551 New and used car dealers 

552 Used car dealers 

554 Gasoline service stations 

555 Boat dealers 

556 Recreational vehicle dealers 

2415360000 

753 Automotive repair shops 

2. Run a query to find reported employment numbers for each of the categories in the table above using 

the ACCESS data tables at K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb. 

3. Subtract the reported employment from the U.S Census Bureau’s numbers to find the process rates 

for each of the counties. 

4 Calculate the VOC emissions by multiplying the default emission factor in the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 6, 

Solvent Cleaning at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii06fin.pdf and the process rate 

for each of the counties found in step 3.

Sub-Category 3.7: Dry Cleaners 

SCC: 2420010370 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from dry cleaners:

1. Calculate an emission factor by finding the number of employees state wide and county wide for SIC 

7216(Laundry and Garment Services) at the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov. 

Note: Use the steps in 2.1-5 to navigate through U.S. Census Bureau’s website 

2. Take the sum of the employment from the counties, multiply by 2000, and divide by the statewide 

total found in step 1. Use this number for the emission factor. 

3. Calculate the process rate by running a query to find the number of reported employees for SIC 7216 

using the ACCESS data tables at K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb and subtract this number from 

the county total. 

4. Multiply the process rate for each of the counties above by the emission factor to calculate for VOC 

emissions. 

12 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

Sub-Category 3.8: Graphic Arts 

SCC: 2425000000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from graphic arts activities: 

1. Multiply the per capita factor found in the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 7, Graphic Arts at 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii07.pdf by the state population from the 

Census Bureau http://www.census.gov to find the total emissions for the state. 

 Note: Use the steps in 2.1-2 to navigate through the U.S. Census Bureau’s website. 

2. Develop an emission factor by subtracting point source emissions from the total emissions and 

dividing by the state population found in step 1. 

3. Distribute to the counties by multiplying the emission factor by the population for each county. 

 Note: Use the steps in 2.1-5 to navigate through the U.S. Census Bureau’s website. 

Sub-Category 3.9: Rubber and Plastics 

SCC: 2430000000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from rubber and plastics activities: 

1. Run a query to find the total of reported emissions and number of reported employees for all SIC’s 

beginning with 30 using the ACCESS data tables at K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb. 

2. Calculate the emission factor by dividing the point source emissions by the reported employees. 

3. Subtract the reported employment for SIC’s beginning with 30 from total employment for each of the 

counties. 

 Note: Use step 3.2-1 to navigate through the County Business Patterns. 

4. Multiply the remaining number from above with the emission factor calculated in step 2. 

Sub-Category 3.10: Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives 

SCC: 2440020000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from industrial adhesives activities: 

1. Using the guidance in the Air Pollutant Emission Trends at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/trends, 

calculate an emission factor by finding the total National Emissions from Industrial Adhesives and 

divide by the National Manufacturing Employment from the U.S. Census Bureau’s website 

http://www.census.gov. 

Note: As of the date of this SOP, the following steps will lead to emission trends data for industrial 

adhesives. 

a. Go to http://www.epa.gov/air/airtrends/aqtrnd03/

b. Select “Appendix A –Data Tables” 

c. Search for industrial adhesives 

Note: As of the date of this SOP, the following steps will lead to National Manufacturing Employment. 

a. Go to http://www.census.gov

13 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

b. Select Economic Census 

c. Now select “Businesses with paid employees” 

d. Use the manufacturing number under “paid employees” 

2. To avoid double calculating, run a query collecting sources reporting adhesives using the ACCESS 

data tables at K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb. Subtract the reported employment from the total 

amount of manufacturing employment. The remaining number is the process rate. 

Sub-Category 3.11: Commercial/Consumer Solvents 

SCC: 2460100000, 2460200000, 2460400000, 2460500000, 2460600000, 2460800000, 2460900000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from commercial/consumer solvent usage: 

1. Using the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 5, Consumer, and Commercial Solvent Use at 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii05.pdf, multiply the per capita factors for each of 

SCC codes by the population for each county from the U.S. Census Bureau’s website 

http://www.census.gov. 

 Note: Use the steps in 2.1-5 to navigate through the U.S. Census Bureau’s website. 

Emission Factors for Commercial/Consumer Solvents 

Source Classification Codes Product Category Per Capita Emission Factor 

(lb VOC/person) 

2460100000 Personal Care Products 2.32 

2460200000 Household Products 0.79 

2460400000 Automotive Aftermarket Products 1.36 

2460500000 Coatings and Related Products 0.95 

2460600000 Adhesives and Sealants 0.57 

2460800000 FIFRA-Regulated Products 1.78 

2460900000 Miscellaneous Products 0.07 

Sub-Category 3.12: Asphalt Emulsions 

SCC: 2461022000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from asphalt emulsions: 

1. To calculate the process rate, find the number of barrels of asphalt used for the state found at the 

State Energy Data website at http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/_seds_updates.html. 

2. Obtain the amount of roadway miles for the state and county from the Indiana Department of 

Transportation’s, Division of Roadway Management Section. 

3. Divide the county roadway miles by the state roadway miles and multiply by the total asphalt usage for 

the state found above in step 1. 

4. Multiply the process rate by the default emission factor in the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 17, Asphalt 

Paving http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii17_apr2001.pdf. 

14 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

Sub-Category 3.13: Pesticide Usage 

SCC: 2461800000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from pesticide usage: 

1. Calculate pesticide usage by using a state specific emission factor. Develop the factor using a 

methodology that includes the retrieval of information of pesticides used, an emission factor for each 

pesticide used, a calculation about the inert ingredients in each pesticide, and an estimate of the 

amount of crop oil concentrate (an adjuvant used for the application of herbicides) used in the state of 

Indiana. 

2. Find the amount of active ingredients for herbicides and insecticides applied to Indiana fields at the 

Indiana Agricultural Statistics Service at http://www.usda.gov/nass/pubs/agr02/acro02.htm. 

3. Insert the numbers for both corn and soybeans to the Excel pesticide table found at K:OAQ_INV\Inv\pesticide. 

4. Calculate the emission factor by adding the emissions from crop oil concentrates obtained in the 

pesticide Excel table, pesticides, and solvent carriers and then divide by the total number of acres of 

corn and soybeans in Indiana found at the National Agricultural Statistics Services, United States 

Department of Agriculture http://www.nass.usda.gov/QuickStats/. 

5. Multiply the emission factor by the county-specific acreage for both corn and soybeans found at the 

National Agricultural Statistics Services, United States Department of Agriculture 

http://www.nass.usda.gov/QuickStats/. 

Category 4: Petroleum Marketing 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions for bulk terminals: 

Sub-Category 4.1: Bulk Terminals 

SCC: 2501050120 

1. Find the amount of gasoline sold in Indiana at the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department 

of Transportation http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohim/hs04/htm/mf21.htm. 

2. Find the amount of gasoline sold statewide and by county using, the NAICS code 447-Gasoline 

Service Station from the U.S. Census Bureau’s, Economic Census at 

http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/data/in/IN000_44.HTM#N447. 

3. Run a query to find the amount of point source reported gasoline using the ACCESS data tables at 

K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb and subtract from the amount sold statewide. Use this to 

allocate to each county. 

 

4. Allocate the amount gasoline sold to each of the counties by dividing the amount of sales in each 

county by statewide sales and multiplying by the number of gallons sold statewide found above in 

step 1. 

5. EPA guidance suggests that only 25% of all gasoline consumed goes through bulk plants. To 

calculate process rate, multiply each county by 25% to estimate the amount of fuel transferred 

through bulk terminals. 

6. Multiply process rate by the emission factors in the table below: 

15 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

Emission Factors 

Source Emission Factor 

(lb VOC/1000) gal 

Storage Tanks Breathing Loss 5.0 

Storage Tank Working Loss - Filling 9.6 

Storage Tank Working Loss - Emptying 3.8 

Gasoline Loading Racks 

(Vapor balance controlled) 

11.9 

(0.3) 

Total 30.3 

7. Bulk terminals also have controls set forth in the Indiana rule (326 IAC 8-4). This rule says that any 

source of this type that is new after January 1, 1980 is required to make sure that any transfer 

between a tank and transport uses a submerged pipe vapor balance system. Using EPA’s default 

rule effectiveness, multiply the number in step 2 by the Control Efficiency (CE) 38%, a Rule 

Effectiveness (RE) of 80%, and a Rule Penetration (RP) of 13%, i.e. process rate X emission factor X 

(1-(CE x RE x RP)) X 1 ton/2000 lb = VOC tons. 

Sub-Category 4.2: Portable Fuel Containers 

SCC: 2501011011, 2501011012, 2501011016, 2501012011, 2501012012, 2501012016 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions for portable fuel containers: 

 

1. Calculate the emissions for Commercial and Residential gas cans by using the method developed by 

the California Environmental Protection Agency’s document Public Meeting to Consider Approval of 

California’s Portable Gasoline-Container Emissions Inventory. Use the excel spreadsheet found at 

K:\OAQ_INV\Inv\Area Source\Gasoline.zip to calculate the emissions for permeation, diurnal, and 

transport. Both the Spillage and Vapor losses are estimated in the nonroad emissions inventory by 

EPA models. 

2. Using the survey results below in Table 1, estimate the number of fuel containers in the state for 

residential categories. The calculations are set up in an excel spreadsheet at K:\OAQ_INV\Inv\Area 

Source\ Gasoline.zip\250101\GasCans.xls, insert the number of occupied housing, from the U.S. 

Census Bureau’s website at http://www.census.gov/, in the space marked “households”. 

Note: As of the data of this SOP, the following steps will lead to number of households in Indiana. 

a. Go to http://www.census.gov/

b. On the left hand side select American Fact finder 

c. Now select housing 

d. Under “Occupancy Status”, select occupies housing units 

e. Now use the drop down menu and select Indiana 

Table 1 

Residential Survey Results 

Percentage of households with at least one gas can 46% 

Number of gas cans per household 1.8 

Percentage of plastic cans/metal cans 76% / 24% 

Weighted average gas can capacity (gal) 2.34 

Percentage of gas cans stored with fuel 70% 

Weighted average stored fuel volume (% of capacity) 49% 

16 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

Percentage of all gas cans that are plastic and stored open/closed 23% / 53% 

Percentage of all gas cans that are metal and stored open/closed 11% / 13% 

Percent of all cans stored open/closed 34% / 66% 

3. Using the survey results below in Table 2, estimate the number of fuel containers for commercial 

categories for the state. Do this by using the commercial population based on the number of identified 

businesses in Table 3 and insert into the excel spreadsheet at K:\OAQ_INV\Inv\Area Source\ 

Gasoline.zip\250101\GasCans.xls. 

 

Table 2 

Commercial Survey Results 

Percentage of businesses with at least one gas can 80% 

Number of gas cans per business 6.9 

Percentage of plastic cans/metal cans 72% / 28% 

Weighted average gas can capacity (gal) 3.43 

Weighted average stored fuel volume (% of capacity) 49% 

Percentage of all gas cans that are plastic and stored open/closed 39% / 33% 

Percentage of all gas cans that are metal and stored open/closed 10% / 18% 

Percent of all cans stored open/closed 49% / 51% 

Table 3 

Category NAICS 

Agricultural 115 

Automotive Club and Towing Services 48841 

Service Stations 8111 

Lawn and Garden Maintenance Services 81141 

General Contractors 23 

Construction and Rental Yards 5324 

Landscaping Services 561730 

4. Calculate permeable emissions separately for both residential and commercial by using the emission 

rates given in the California document. Use 1.57g/gal/day for plastic containers and 0.6g/gal/day for 

metal containers. Insert the numbers for both residential and commercial into the excel spreadsheet at 

K:\OAQ_INV\Inv\Area Source\ Gasoline.zip\250101\GasCans.xls. 

5. Calculate diurnal emissions by inserting the numbers for both residential and commercial into the 

excel spreadsheet at K:\OAQ_INV\Inv\Area Source\ Gasoline.zip\250101\GasCans.xls. 

6. Calculate transport spillage emissions by inserting the numbers for both residential and commercial into the 

excel spreadsheet at K:\OAQ_INV\Inv\Area Source\ Gasoline.zip\250101\GasCans.xls 

Sub-Category 4.3: Service Station Tank Loading or Tank Truck Unloading (Stage 1) 

SCC: 2501060052 (uncontrolled), 2501060053 (controlled) 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from tank loading and unloading 

1. Find the amount of gasoline sold in Indiana at the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of 

Transportation http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohim/hs04/htm/mf21.htm. 

2. Find the amount of gasoline sold statewide and county wide by using the NAICS code 447-Gasoline 

Service Station from the U.S. Census Bureau’s, Economic Census at 

http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/data/in/IN000_44.HTM#N447. 

17 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

3. Run a query to find the amount of point source reported gasoline using the ACCESS data tables at 

K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb and subtract from the amount sold statewide. Use this to 

allocate to each county. 

 

4. Allocate the amount sold to each of the counties by dividing the amount of sales in each county by 

statewide sales and multiplying by the number of gallons sold statewide found above in step 1. 

5. Find the amount of gasoline tanks from the Underground Storage Tank data files from the Office of 

Land Quality, Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

http://www.in.gov/idem/programs/land/ust/ust.html. 

6. Now copy the data into an Excel spreadsheet. Filter finding the tanks that have only gasoline. Also 

filter out the tanks that are “permanently out of service”, “suspended per inspection”, and 

“unregulated”. 

7. Using the Petroleum Sources Applicability Rule 326 IAC 8-4-1, filter out the tanks that are located in 

Clark, Boone, Dearborn, Elkhart, Floyd, Hamilton, Hancock, Harrison, Hendricks, Johnson, Lake, 

Marion, Morgan, Porter, Saint Joseph, and Shelby counties. 

8. To find the amount of balanced tanks in Indiana, use the total of gasoline tanks found in step 7 and 

divide by the number of tanks that constructed after 1985 through current year. Use the spreadsheet 

created in step 7 and filter out the tanks that constructed prior to 1985. 

9. Now apply the percentage found in step 8 to the amount of gasoline found in each county. 

10. Apply the controlled emission factor to only those counties identified in 326 IAC 8-4, i.e. Boone, Clark, 

Dearborn, Elkhart, Hamilton, Hancock, Harrison, Hendricks, Johnson, Lake, Marion, Morgan, Porter, 

Saint Joseph, and Shelby. Use the emission factors for stage 1 controlled and uncontrolled in the 

EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 11, Gasoline Marketing (Stage 1 and Stage 2) 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii11_apr2001.pdf. 

Sub-Category 4.4: Vehicle Fueling (Stage II) – Vapor Displacement 

SCC: 2501060101 (uncontrolled), 2501060102 (controlled) 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from vehicle fueling – Vapor Displacement: 

1. Find the amount of gasoline sold in Indiana at the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department 

of Transportation http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohim/hs04/htm/mf21.htm. 

2. Find the amount of gasoline sold statewide and by county using the NAICS code 447-Gasoline 

Service Station from the U.S. Census Bureau’s, Economic Census at 

http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/data/in/IN000_44.HTM#N447. 

3. Allocate the amount sold to each of the counties by dividing the amount of sales in each county by 

statewide sales and multiplying by the number of gallons sold statewide found above in step 1. 

4. Calculate an emission factor using the input files supplied from the mobile model. Table 1 and Table 

2 show examples of how the emission factors for January and July for the Southern Counties were 

calculated. By using these two months, the other months are distributed. Use the average of all 

months for the emission factor for the Southern counties. Use the same methodology for the 

Northern counties, Central Counties, Clark/Floyd, and Lake/Porter. 

18 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

Table 1 

January Run for Southern Counties 

VTYPE GM_MILE MILES MPG VMT G/GAL Month Factor 

1 0.0628 29.4642 23.89 0.463793 0.322719 1 1.01 

2 0.1058 35.2923 18.77 0.070491 0.009868 2 1.14 

3 0.1058 35.2923 18.77 0.234672 0.109364 3 1.28 

4 0.1486 34.0851 14.31 0.071379 0.010834 4 1.41 

5 0.1486 34.0851 14.31 0.032825 0.002291 5 1.55 

6 0.2152 35.8919 9.88 0.028896 0.001775 6 1.69 

7 0.2342 32.3617 9.08 0.001027 2.24E-06 7 1.82 

8 0.2465 19.9098 8.63 0.000522 5.8E-07 8 1.69 

9 0.2719 27.6093 7.82 0.001164 2.88E-06 9 1.55 

10 0.2733 27.4686 7.78 0.002489 1.32E-05 10 1.41 

11 0.2972 24.3758 7.15 0.001132 2.72E-06 11 1.28 

12 0.3169 23.6257 6.71 0.000004 3.4E-11 12 1.14 

25 0.3421 27.2301 6.22 0.000496 5.23E-07 Sum 16.97 

0.456873 g/gal Average 1.41 

1.007222 lb/E3gal 

19 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

Table 2 

July Run for Southern Counties 

VTYPE GM_MILE MILES MPG VMT G/GAL 

1 0.1144 29.1752 23.9 0.456768 0.570447 

2 0.1955 34.8826 18.75 0.071404 0.018689 

3 0.1955 34.8826 18.75 0.237712 0.207133 

4 0.2882 33.944 14.3 0.072838 0.021865 

5 0.2882 33.944 14.3 0.033496 0.004624 

6 0.4164 35.8288 9.9 0.029201 0.003515 

7 0.4529 32.4716 9.1 0.001038 4.44E-06 

8 0.4763 19.6757 8.66 0.000509 1.07E-06 

9 0.5264 27.4602 7.83 0.00116 5.55E-06 

10 0.5283 27.3328 7.8 0.002482 2.54E-05 

11 0.5749 24.2458 7.17 0.001122 5.19E-06 

12 0.6128 23.3718 6.73 0.000004 6.6E-11 

25 0.6629 27.2301 6.22 0.000485 9.7E-07 

0.826316 g/gal 

1.821697 lb/E3gal 

 5. Multiply the process rate in step 4 by the emission factor found in the mobile model. 

Sub-Category 4.5: Vehicle Fueling (Stage II) – Spillage 

SCC: 2501060103 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from vehicle fueling – Spillage: 

1. Find the amount of gasoline sold in Indiana at the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department 

of Transportation http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohim/hs04/htm/mf21.htm. 

2. Find the amount of gasoline sold statewide and by county using the NAICS code 447-Gasoline 

Service Station from the U.S. Census Bureau’s, Economic Census at 

http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/data/in/IN000_44.HTM#N447. 

3. Allocate the amount sold to each of the counties by dividing the amount of sales in each county by 

statewide sales and multiplying by the number of gallons sold statewide found above in step 1. 

4. Apply the emission factor 0.7 lb VOC/1000 gallons in AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 5, 

Petroleum Industry, Transportation, and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch05/final/c05s02.pdf to the process rate found in step 4. 

Sub-Category 4.6: Underground Tank Breathing 

SCC: 2501060200 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from underground tank breathing: 

1. Find the amount of gasoline sold in Indiana at the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department 

of Transportation http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohim/hs04/htm/mf21.htm. 

2. Find the amount of gasoline sold statewide and by county using the NAICS code 447-Gasoline 

Service Station from the U.S. Census Bureau’s, Economic Census at 

http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/data/in/IN000_44.HTM#N447. 

20 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

3. Allocate the amount sold to each of the counties by dividing the amount of sales in each county by 

statewide sales and multiplying by the number of gallons sold statewide found above in step 1. 

4. Apply the emission factor 1.0 lb VOC/1000 gallons in AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 5, 

Petroleum Industry, Transportation, and Marketing of Petroleum Liquids 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch05/final/c05s02.pdf to the process rate found in step 4. 

Sub-Category 4.7: Tank Trucks in Transit 

SCC: 2505030120 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from tank trucks in transit: 

1. Find the amount of gasoline sold in Indiana at the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department 

of Transportation http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohim/hs04/htm/mf21.htm. 

2. Find the amount of gasoline sold statewide and by county using the NAICS code 447-Gasoline 

Service Station from the U.S. Census Bureau’s, Economic Census at 

http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/data/in/IN000_44.HTM#N447. 

3. Allocate the amount sold to each of the counties by dividing the amount of sales in each county by 

statewide sales and multiplying by the number of gallons sold statewide found above in step 1. 

4. Using the guidance in the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 11, Gasoline Marketing (Stage I and State II) at 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii11_apr2001.pdf), multiply the activity rate 1.25 

by the amount sold per county found in step 4. 

5. Now multiply the process rate found in step 5 by the emission factor .06 lb VOC/gallon transported 

using the EIIP guidance above. 

Category 5: Waste Management Practices 

Sub-Category 5.1: Solid Waste Incineration 

5.1.1: Industrial Solid Waste Incineration 

SCC: 2601010000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from industrial solid waste incineration: 

1. Find the number of manufacturing employees, NAICS code 31, for each county using the County Business Patterns 

 at the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://censtats.census.gov/cgi-bin/cbpnaic/cbpsel.pl. 

 Note: Use the steps in 3.2-1 to navigate through the county business patterns. 

2. Multiply the county manufacturing employment by the default fuel-loading factor 420 tons / 1,000 

manufacturing employees. 

3. Multiply the process rate in step 2 by AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 2-1.12, Solid Waste 

Disposal at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch02/index.html. 

21 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

5.1.2: Commercial Solid Waste Incineration 

SCC: 2601020000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from commercial solid waste incineration: 

1. Find the population for each county at the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov/. 

 Note: Use steps 2.1-5 to navigate through the U.S. Census Bureau’s website. 

2. Next find the default factor of .65lb/person/day from U.S. EPA Municipal Solid Waste Report 

http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/muncpl/msw99.htm. 

3. Find the percent of commercial solid waste from the U.S. EPA Municipal Solid Waste Report above. 

4. Now, calculate the process rate for commercial solid waste incineration by multiplying population by 

the default factor of .65lb/person/day by the percent of commercial solid waste and number of days in 

a year. 

5. Multiply the process rate in step 4 by AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 2-1.12, Solid Waste 

Disposal at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch02/index.html. 

5.1.3: Residential Solid Waste Incineration 

SCC: 2601030000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from residential solid waste incineration: 

1. Find the population for each county at the U.S. Census Bureau’s website http://www.census.gov/. 

 Note: Use step 2.1-5 to navigate through the U.S. Census Bureau’s website. 

2. Next find the default factor of .65lb/person/day from U.S. EPA Municipal Solid Waste Report 

http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/muncpl/msw99.htm. 

3. Find the percent of residential solid waste from the U.S. EPA Municipal Solid Waste Report above. 

4. Now, calculate the process rate for residential solid waste incineration by multiplying population by 

the default factor of .65lb/person/day by the percent of commercial solid waste and number of days in 

a year. 

5. Multiply the process rate in step 4 by AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 2-1.12, Solid Waste 

Disposal at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch02/index.html. 

Sub-Category 5.2: Residential Open Burning 

5.2.1: Leaf and Brush Burning 

SCC: 2610000100 and 2610000400 

Follow theses step when calculating emissions from leaf and brush burning: 

1. Find a per capita factor for leaf burning and a per capita for brush burning by using the U.S. EPA’s 

Solid Waste Report at http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/muncpl/msw99.htm. 

2. Allocate the amount burned by adjusting the per capita factor for leaves at 25% and for brush at 25%. 

Of the total waste generated only 28% burns. 

22 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

3. Once all the percentages from above are calculated, multiply the adjusted per capita factor by the rural 

population for each county from the U.S. Census Bureau at http://www.census.gov/

Note: As of the data of this SOP, the following steps will lead to county rural population. 

a. Go to http://www.census.gov/

b. On the left hand side, select American Fact Finder 

c. Select data sets 

d. Detailed tables 

e. County 

f. Indiana 

g. All counties 

4 Use the table below to adjust the amount of waste generated to account for the percentage of forest 

in each county. The percentages come from a document from the United States Department of 

Agriculture at http://ncrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/rb/rb_nc253b.pdf. 

Percent Forested Acres per County Adjusted for Yard Waste Generated 

< 10% 0% generated 

>= 10%, and < 50% 50% generated 

>= 50% 100% generated 

5. Now, multiply the amount of leaves and brush by the emission factors found in AP-42, Fifth Edition, 

Volume 1, Chapter 2, Solid Waste Disposal, Table 2.5-5, and Table 2.5-6 at 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch02/final/c02s05.pdf. 

5.2.2: Residential Waste Incineration 

SCC: 2610030000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from for residential waste incineration: 

1. Find a per capita factor for residential waste incineration by using the U.S. EPA’s Solid Waste Report 

at http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/muncpl/pubs/mswchar05.pdf. 

2. Using the Solid Waste Report above, subtract the percentage of recycled and composted material 

from the per capita factor above. 

3. Now, subtract the percentages of combustibles i.e. glass, metal, yard trimmings, and other waste. 

4. Using a document from EPA, it states that only 28% of waste generated by rural population burns and 

of that percent, 49% is actually combusted. Using this information multiply the per capita factor by 

0.28 and then multiply that number by 0.49 actually burned in rural counties. 

5. Once all the percentages are calculated, multiply the adjusted per capita factor by the rural population 

for each county from the U.S. Census Bureau at http://www.census.gov/. 

 Note: Use steps 5.2.1-3 to find county rural population. 

6. Calculate the amount of residential waste by the emission factors in the EIIP, Volume 3, Chapter 16, 

Open Burning at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/index.html. 

Sub-Category 5.3: Public Owned Treatment Works (POTW’s) 

SCC: 2630020000 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from POTW’s: 

23 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

1. To calculate the amount of annual flow for public owned treatment works, obtain the amount of 

monthly flow rate for each county. This is data is supplied by the Office of Water Quality. To 

calculate for annual flow multiply the monthly flow by the default of 0.16 that represents the amount of 

industrial flow. 

2. Calculate the process rate above by the emission factors in FIRE 6.25 using the SCC code 

2630020000. 

Sub-Category 5.4: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities 

SCC: 2640000004 

Follow these steps when calculating emissions from treatment, storage, and disposal facilities: 

1. Obtain a list of treatment facilities and the amount of ignitable waste from each facility from IDEM’s 

Office of Land Quality. 

2. Using the list of facilities from step 1, run a query using the ACCESS data tables at 

K:\OAQ_INV\Steptool\Stptl_02.mdb to obtain the amount of ignitable waste reported to IDEM’s Office 

of Air Quality. 

3. Compare the two lists obtained in step 1 and step 2, for each facility subtract any quantity reported to 

OAQ from the quantity reported to OLQ. Do this in order to avoid double counting quantities reported 

to both offices. Combine the quantities reported from facilities within the same counties. Use these 

quantities as the process rate for each county. 

4. Multiply the process rate above with the combined emission factor in the table below: 

Emission Source Emission Factor in AP-42 

(lb VOC/Ton) 

Emission Factor Used 

(lb VOC/Ton) 

Storage Tank Vent 0.004-0.09 0.09 

Spillage (filling) 0.20 0.20 

Loading (filling) 0.00024-1.42 1.42 

Spillage (emptying) 0.20 0.20 

Loading (emptying) 0.00024-1.42 1.42 

Combined Emission Factor 3.33 

Category 6: Submit Data to EPA 

Submit data in a format that is acceptable to EPA. At the present time the format is the 

National Emission Inventory (NEI). 

6. Standards and checklists 

The Emission Reporting program does not have any checklist for the Area Source Inventory at this time. 

The Emission Group does this electronically through an excel spreadsheet that is created when needed. 

7. Records Management 

The Area Source Inventory files are kept electronically at K:\OAQ_INV\Inv\Area Source. 

The Branch Contact for the Air Programs Branch and the Section contact for the Technical Support and 

Modeling Section will keep copies of the SOPs for the Technical Support and Modeling Section to be 

referenced as needed. An electronic copy will also be available on K:\OAQ_INV\SOPs. 

24 
Area Source Inventory 

S-006-OAQ-R-MO-08-S-R1 

8. Quality Assurance / Quality Control 

Comparisons are made against the emissions estimates made by The U.S. EPA in the NEI. 

9. Continuous Improvement Cycle 

A periodic review will be completed per updates and changes made to the EIIP. 

10. References 

The Area Source Inventory is a requirement of 40 CFR Part 51 Subpart A - Emission Inventory Reporting 

Requirements. 

11. History of Revisions 

 

Date 

Month/day/year Revision Number Description 

02/27/2008 1 Revised using new SOP template. 

12. Appendices 

None 

25 
APPENDIX H 

Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium 

(LADCO) Emission Estimates Technical Support 

Document 
F - 1 

This page left intentionally blank. 
Regional Air Quality Analyses for

Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze: 

Final Technical Support Document

April 25, 2008

States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin
ii

Table of Contents

Section-Title Page

Executive Summary iii

1.0 Introduction 1

1.1 SIP Requirements 1

1.2 Organization 2

1.3 Technical Work: Overview 3

2.0 Ambient Data Analyses 4

2.1 Ozone 4

2.2 PM2.5 21

2.3 Regional Haze 35

3.0 Air Quality Modeling 46

3.1 Selection of Base Year 46

3.2 Future Years of Interest 46

3.3 Modeling System 47

3.4 Domain/Grid Resolution 47

3.5 Model Inputs: Meteorology 48

3.6 Model Inputs: Emissions 51

3.7 Base Year Modeling Results 60

4.0 Attainment Demonstration for Ozone and PM2.5 71

4.1 Future Year Modeling Results 71

4.2 Supplemental Analyses 82

4.3 Weight of Evidence Determination for Ozone 82

4.4 Weight of Evidence Determination for PM2.5 90

5.0 Reasonable Progress Assessment for Regional Haze 93

5.1 Class I Areas Impacted 93

5.2 Future Year Modeling Results 96

5.3 Weight of Evidence Determination for Regional Haze 104

6.0 Summary 111

7.0 References 114

Appendix I Ozone and PM2.5 Modeling Results

Appendix II Ozone Source Apportionment Modeling Results

Appendix III PM2.5Source Apportionment Modeling Results

Appendix IV Haze Source Apportionment Modeling Results
iii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

States in the upper Midwest face a number of air quality challenges. More than 50 counties are 

currently classified as nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone standard and 60 for the fine particle 

(PM2.5) standard (1997 versions). A map of these nonattainment areas is provided in the figure 

below. In addition, visibility impairment due to regional haze is a problem in the larger national 

parks and wilderness areas (i.e., Class I areas). There are 156 Class I areas in the U.S., 

including two in northern Michigan.

Figure i. Current nonattainment counties for ozone (left) and PM2.5 (right)

To support the development of State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for ozone, PM2.5, and 

regional haze in the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin, technical 

analyses were conducted by the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO), its member 

states, and various contractors. The analyses include preparation of regional emissions 

inventories and meteorological data, evaluation and application of regional chemical transport 

models, and collection and analysis of ambient monitoring data. 

Monitoring data were analyzed to produce a conceptual understanding of the air quality 

problems. Key findings of the analyses include:

Ozone

• Current monitoring data (2005-2007) show about 20 sites in violation of the 8-hour 

ozone standard of 85 parts per billion (ppb). Historical ozone data show a steady 

downward trend over the past 15 years, especially since 2001-2003, due likely to 

federal and state emission control programs.

• Ozone concentrations are strongly influenced by meteorological conditions, with 

more high ozone days and higher ozone levels during summers with above normal 

temperatures.
iv

• Inter- and intra-regional transport of ozone and ozone precursors affects many 

portions of the five states, and is the principal cause of nonattainment in some areas 

far from population or industrial centers. 

PM2.5

• Current monitoring data (2005-2007) show 30 sites in violation of the annual PM2.5

standard of 15 ug/m3. Nonattainment sites are characterized by an elevated 

regional background (about 12 – 14 ug/m3) and a significant local (urban) increment 

(about 2 – 3 ug/m3). Historical PM2.5 data show a slight downward trend since 

deployment of the PM2.5 monitoring network in 1999.

• PM2.5 concentrations are also influenced by meteorology, but the relationship is 

more complex and less well understood compared to ozone.

• On an annual average basis, PM2.5 chemical composition consists mostly of sulfate, 

nitrate, and organic carbon in similar proportions.

Haze

• Current monitoring data (2000-2004) show visibility levels in the Class I areas in 

northern Michigan are on the order of 22 – 24 deciviews. The goal of EPA’s visibility 

program is to achieve natural conditions, which is about 12 deciviews for these 

Class I areas, by the year 2064.

• Visibility impairment is dominated by sulfate and nitrate.

Air quality models were applied to support the regional planning efforts. Two base years were 

used in the modeling analyses: 2002 and 2005. Basecase modeling was conducted to evaluate 

model performance (i.e., assess the model's ability to reproduce observed concentrations). This 

exercise was intended to build confidence in the model prior to its use in examining control 

strategies. Model performance for ozone and PM2.5 was found to be generally acceptable.

Future year strategy modeling was conducted to determine whether existing (“on the books”) 

controls would be sufficient to provide for attainment of the standards for ozone and PM2.5 and if 

not, then what additional emission reductions would be necessary for attainment. Based on the 

modeling and other supplemental analyses, the following general conclusions can be made:

• Existing controls are expected to produce significant improvement in ozone and 

PM2.5 concentrations and visibility levels.

• The choice of the base year affects the future year model projections. A key 

difference between the base years of 2002 and 2005 is meteorology. 2002 was 

more ozone conducive than 2005. The choice of which base year to use as the 

basis for the SIP is a policy decision (i.e., how much safeguard to incorporate).

• Modeling suggests that most sites are expected to meet the current 8-hour ozone 

standard by the applicable attainment date, except for sites in western Michigan 

and, possibly, in eastern Wisconsin and northeastern Ohio.
v

• Modeling suggests that most sites are expected to meet the current PM2.5

standard by the applicable attainment date, except for sites in Detroit, Cleveland, 

and Granite City.

The regional modeling for PM2.5 does not include air quality benefits expected 

from local controls. States are conducting local-scale analyses and will use

these results, in conjunction with the regional-scale modeling, to support their 

attainment demonstrations for PM2.5.

• These findings of residual nonattainment for ozone and PM2.5 are supported by 

current (2005 – 2007) monitoring data which show significant nonattainment in 

the region (e.g., peak ozone design values on the order of 90 – 93 ppb, and peak 

PM2.5 design values on the order of 16 - 17 ug/m3). It is unlikely that sufficient 

emission reductions will occur in the next couple of years to provide for 

attainment at all sites.

• Attainment at most sites by the applicable attainment date is dependent on actual 

future year meteorology (e.g., if the weather conditions are consistent with [or 

less severe than] 2005, then attainment is likely) and actual future year 

emissions (e.g., if the emission reductions associated with the existing controls 

are achieved, then attainment is likely). If either of these conditions is not met, 

then attainment may be less likely.

• Modeling suggests that the new PM2.5 24-hour standard and the new lower 

ozone standard will not be met at several sites, even by 2018, with existing 

controls.

• Visibility levels in a few Class I areas in the eastern U.S. are expected to be 

greater than (less improved than) the uniform rate of visibility improvement 

values in 2018 based on existing controls, including those in northern Michigan 

and some in the northeastern U.S. Visibility levels in many other Class I areas in 

the eastern U.S. are expected to be less than (more improved than) the uniform 

rate of visibility improvement values in 2018. These results, along with 

information on the costs of compliance, time necessary for compliance, energy 

and non air quality environmental impacts of compliance, and remaining useful 

life of existing sources, should be considered by the states in setting reasonable 

progress goals for regional haze.
1

Section 1.0 Introduction

This Technical Support Document summarizes the final air quality analyses conducted by the 

Lake Michigan Directors Consortium (LADCO)1and its contractors to support the development 

of State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for ozone, fine particles (PM2.5 ), and regional haze in the 

States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin. The analyses include preparation of 

regional emissions inventories and meteorological modeling data for two base years (2002 and 

2005), evaluation and application of regional chemical transport models, and analysis of 

ambient monitoring data. 

Two aspects of the analyses should be emphasized. First, a regional, multi-pollutant approach 

was taken in addressing ozone, PM2.5, and haze for technical reasons (e.g., commonality in

precursors, emission sources, atmospheric processes, transport influences, and geographic 

areas of concern), and practical reasons (e.g., more efficient use of program resources). 

Furthermore, EPA has consistently encouraged multi-pollutant planning in its rule for the haze 

program (64 FR 35719), and its implementation guidance for ozone (70 FR 71663) and PM2.5

(72 FR 20609). Second, a weight-of-evidence approach was taken in considering the results of 

the various analyses (i.e., two sets of modeling results -- one for a 2002 base year and one for a 

2005 base year -- and ambient data analyses) in order to provide a more robust assessment of 

expected future year air quality.

The report is organized in the following sections. This Introduction provides an overview of 

regulatory requirements and background information on regional planning. Section 2 reviews 

the ambient monitoring data and presents a conceptual model of ozone, PM2.5, and haze for the 

region. Section 3 discusses the air quality modeling analyses, including development of the key 

model inputs (emissions inventory and meteorological data), and basecase model performance 

evaluation. A modeled attainment demonstration for ozone and PM2.5 is presented in Section 4, 

along with relevant data analyses considered as part of the weight-of-evidence determination. 

Section 5 documents the reasonable progress assessment for regional haze, along with

relevant data analyses considered as part of the weight-of-evidence determination. Finally, key 

study findings are reviewed and summarized in Section 6.

1.1 SIP Requirements

For ozone, EPA promulgated designations on April 15, 2004 (69 FR 23858, April 30, 2004). In 

the 5-state region, more than 100 counties were designated as nonattainment.

2

 The

designations became effective on June 15, 2004. SIPs for ozone were due no later than three 

years from the effective date of the nonattainment designations (i.e., by June 2007). The

attainment date for ozone varies as a function of nonattainment classification. For the region, 

the attainment dates are either June 2007 (marginal nonattainment areas), June 2009 (basic 

nonattainment areas), or June 2010 (moderate nonattainment areas).

 

1

 A sub-entity of LADCO, known as the Midwest Regional Planning Organization (MRPO), is responsible 

for the regional haze activities of the multi-state organization.

2

 Based on more recent air quality data, many counties in Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio were 

subsequently redesignated as attainment. As of December 31, 2007, there are 53 counties designated 

as nonattainment in the region.
2

For PM2.5, EPA promulgated designations on December 17, 2004 (70 FR 944, January 5, 2005). 

In the 5-state region, 70 counties were designated as nonattainment.3 The designations became 

effective on April 5, 2005. SIPs for PM2.5 are due no later than three years from the effective 

date of the nonattainment designations (per section 172(b) of the Clean Air Act) (i.e., by April 

2008) and for haze no later than three years after the date on which the Administrator 

promulgated the PM2.5 designations (per the Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2004) (i.e., by 

December 2007). The applicable attainment date for PM2.5 nonattainment areas is five years 

from the date of the nonattainment designation (i.e., by April 2010). 

For haze, the Clean Air Act sets “as a national goal the prevention of any future, and the 

remedying of any existing, impairment of visibility in Class I areas which impairment results from 

manmade air pollution.” There are 156 Class I areas, including two in northern Michigan: Isle 

Royale National Park and Seney National Wildlife Refuge4. EPA’s visibility rule (64 FR 35714, 

July 1, 1999) requires reasonable progress in achieving “natural conditions” by the year 2064. 

As noted above, the first regional haze SIP was due in December 2007 and must address the 

initial 10-year implementation period (i.e., reasonable progress by the year 2018). SIP 

requirements (pursuant to 40 CFR 51.308(d)) include setting reasonable progress goals, 

determining baseline conditions, determining natural conditions, providing a long-term control 

strategy, providing a monitoring strategy (air quality and emissions), and establishing BART 

emissions limitations and associated compliance schedule. 

1.2 Organization

LADCO was established by the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin in 1989. The 

four states and EPA signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) that initiated the Lake 

Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS) and identified LADCO as the organization to oversee the study. 

Additional MOAs were signed by the States in 1991 (to establish the Lake Michigan Ozone 

Control Program), January 2000 (to broaden LADCO’s responsibilities), and June 2004 (to 

update LADCO’s mission and reaffirm the commitment to regional planning). In March 2004, 

Ohio joined LADCO. LADCO consists of a Board of Directors (i.e., the State Air Directors), a 

technical staff, and various workgroups. The main purposes of LADCO are to provide technical 

assessments for and assistance to its member states, and to provide a forum for its member 

states to discuss regional air quality issues. 

MRPO is a similar entity led by the five LADCO States and involves the federally recognized 

tribes in Michigan and Wisconsin, EPA, and Federal Land Managers (i.e., National Park

Service, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Agency, and U.S. Forest Service). In October 2000, the States of 

Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin signed an MOA that established the MRPO. An 

operating principles document for MRPO, which describe the roles and responsibilities of states, 

tribes, federal agencies, and stakeholders, was issued in March 2001. MRPO has a similar 

purpose as LADCO, but is focused on visibility impairment due to regional haze in the Federal 

Class I areas located inside the borders of the five states, and the impact of emissions from the 

five states on visibility impairment due to regional haze in the Federal Class I areas located

outside the borders of the five states. MRPO works cooperatively with the Regional Planning 

Organizations (RPOs) representing other parts of the country. The RPOs sponsored several

 

3

 USEPA subsequently adjusted the final designations, which resulted in 63 counties in the region being 

designated as nonattainment (70 FR 19844, April 15, 2005).

4

 Although Rainbow Lake in northern Wisconsin is also a Class I area, the visibility rule does not apply

because the Federal Land Manager determined that visibility is not an air quality related value there.
3

joint projects and, with assistance by EPA, maintain regular contact on technical and policy 

matters.

1.3 Technical Work: Overview

To ensure the reliability and effectiveness of its planning process, LADCO has made data 

collection and analysis a priority. More than $7M in RPO grant funds were used for special 

purpose monitoring, preparing and improving emissions inventories, and conducting air quality 

analyses5. An overview of the technical work is provided below.

Monitoring: Numerous monitoring projects were conducted to supplement on-going state and 

local air pollution monitoring. These projects include rural monitoring (e.g., comprehensive 

sampling in the Seney National Wildlife Refuge and in Bondville, IL); urban monitoring (e.g., 

continuation of the St. Louis Supersite); aloft (aircraft) measurements; regional ammonia 

monitoring; and organic speciation sampling in Seney, Bondville, and five urban areas.

Emissions: Baseyear emissions inventories were prepared for 2002 and 2005. States provided 

point source and area source emissions data, and MOBILE6 input files and mobile source 

activity data. LADCO and its contractors developed the emissions data for other source 

categories (e.g., select nonroad sources, ammonia, fires, and biogenics) and processed the 

data for input into an air quality model. To support control strategy modeling, future year 

inventories were prepared. The future years of interest include 2008 (planning year to address 

the 2009 attainment year for basic ozone nonattainment ares), 2009 (planning year to address 

the 2010 attainment year for PM2.5 and moderate ozone nonattainment areas), 2012 (planning

to address a 2013 alternative attainment date), and 2018 (first milestone year for regional haze).

Air Quality Analyses: The weight-of-evidence approach relies on data analysis and modeling. 

Air quality data analyses were used to provide both a conceptual model (i.e., a qualitative 

description of the ozone, PM2.5, and regional haze problems) and supplemental information for 

the attainment demonstration. Given uncertainties in emissions inventories and modeling, 

especially for PM2.5, these data analyses are a necessary part of the overall technical support.

Modeling includes baseyear analyses for 2002 and 2005 to evaluate model performance and 

future year strategy analyses to assess candidate control strategies. The analyses were 

conducted in accordance with EPA’s modeling guidelines (EPA, 2007a). The PM/haze 

modeling covers the full calendar year (2002 and 2005) for an eastern U.S. 36 km domain, while 

the ozone modeling focuses on the summer period (2002 and 2005) for a Midwest 12 km 

subdomain. The same model (CAMx) was used for ozone, PM2.5, and regional haze.

 

5

 Since 1999, MRPO has received almost $10M in RPO grant funds from USEPA.
4

Section 2.0 Ambient Data Analyses

An extensive network of air quality monitors in the 5-state region provides data for ozone (and 

its precursors), PM2.5 (both total mass and individual chemical species), and visibility. These 

data are used to determine attainment/nonattainment designations, support SIP development, 

and provide air quality information to public (see, for example, www.airnow.gov).

Analyses of the data were conducted to produce a conceptual model, which is a qualitative 

summary of the physical, chemical, and meteorological processes that control the formation and 

distribution of pollutants in a given region. This section reviews the relevant data analyses and 

describes our understanding of ozone, PM2.5, and regional haze with respect to current 

conditions, data variability (spatial, temporal, and chemical), influence of meteorology (including 

transport patterns), precursor sensitivity, and source culpability.

2.1 Ozone

In 1979, EPA adopted an ozone standard of 0.12 ppm, averaged over a 1-hour period. This 

standard is attained when the number of days per calendar year with maximum hourly average 

concentrations above 0.12 ppm is equal to or less than 1.0, averaged over a 3-year period, 

which generally reflects a design value (i.e., the 4th highest daily 1-hour value over a 3-year 

period) less than 0.12 ppm.

In 1997, EPA tightened the ozone standard to 0.08 ppm, averaged over an 8-hour period6. The 

standard is attained if the 3-year average of the 4th-highest daily maximum 8-hour average 

ozone concentrations (i.e., the design value) measured at each monitor within an area is less 

than 0.08 ppm (or 85 ppb). 

Current Conditions: A map of the 8-hour ozone design values at each monitoring site in the 

region for the 3-year period 2005-2007 is shown in Figure 1. The “hotter” colors represent 

higher concentrations, where yellow and orange dots represent sites with design values above 

the standard. Currently, there are 19 sites in violation of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the 5-state 

region, including sites in the Lake Michigan area, Detroit, Cleveland, Cincinnati, and Columbus.

Table 1 provides the 4th-highest daily 8-hour ozone values and the associated design values 

since 2001 for several high monitoring sites throughout the region.

 

6

 On March 12, 2008, USEPA further tightened the 8-hour ozone standard to increase public health 

protection and prevent environmental damage from ground-level ozone. USEPA set the primary (health) 

standard and secondary (welfare) standard at the same level: 0.075 ppm (75 ppb), averaged over an 8-

hour period.
5

Figure 1. 8-hour ozone design values (2005-2007)
Key Sites

'01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '01-'03 '02-'04 '03-'05 '04-'06 '05-'07

Lake Michigan Area

Chiwaukee 99 116 88 78 93 79 85 101 94 86 83 85

Racine 92 111 82 69 95 71 77 95 87 82 78 81

Milwaukee-Bayside 93 99 92 73 93 73 83 94 88 86 79 83

Harrington Beach 102 93 99 72 94 72 84 98 88 88 79 83

Manitowoc 97 83 92 74 95 78 85 90 83 87 82 86

Sheboygan 102 105 93 78 97 83 88 100 92 89 86 89

Kewaunee 90 92 97 73 88 76 85 93 87 86 79 83

Door County 95 95 93 78 101 79 92 94 88 90 86 90

Hammond 90 101 81 67 87 75 77 90 83 78 76 79

Whiting 64 88 81 88 77 85

Michigan City 90 107 82 70 84 75 73 93 86 78 76 77

Ogden Dunes 85 101 77 69 90 70 84 87 82 78 76 81

Holland 92 105 96 79 94 91 94 97 93 89 88 93

Jenison 86 93 91 69 86 83 88 90 84 82 79 85

Muskegon 95 96 94 70 90 90 86 95 86 84 83 88

Indianapolis Area

Noblesville 88 101 101 75 87 77 84 96 92 87 79 82

Fortville 89 101 92 72 80 75 81 94 88 81 75 78

Fort B. Harrison 87 100 91 73 80 76 83 92 88 81 76 79

Detroit Area

New Haven 95 95 102 81 88 78 93 97 92 90 82 86

Warren 94 92 101 71 89 78 91 95 88 87 79 86

Port Huron 84 100 87 74 88 78 89 90 87 83 80 85

Cleveland Area

Ashtabula (Conneaut) 97 103 99 81 93 86 92 99 94 91 86 90

Notre Dame (Geauga) 99 115 97 75 88 70 68 103 95 86 77 75

Eastlake (Lake) 89 104 92 79 97 83 74 95 91 89 86 84

Akron (Summit) 98 103 89 77 89 77 91 96 89 85 81 85

Cincinnati Area

Wilmington (Clinton) 93 99 96 78 83 81 82 96 91 85 80 82

Sycamore (Hamilton) 88 100 93 76 89 81 90 93 89 86 82 86

Hamilton (Butler) 83 100 94 75 86 79 91 92 89 85 80 85

Middleton (Butler) 87 98 83 76 88 76 91 89 85 82 80 85

Lebanon (Warren) 85 98 95 81 92 86 88 92 91 89 86 88

Columbus Area

London (Madison) 84 97 90 75 81 76 83 90 87 82 77 80

New Albany (Franklin) 90 103 94 78 92 82 87 95 91 88 84 87

Franklin (Franklin) 83 99 84 73 86 79 79 88 85 81 79 81

Ohio Other Areas

Marietta (Washington) 85 95 80 77 88 81 86 86 84 81 82 85

St. Louis Area

W. Alton (MO) 85 99 91 77 89 91 89 91 89 85 85 89

Orchard (MO) 88 98 90 76 92 92 83 92 88 86 86 89

Sunset Hills (MO) 88 98 88 70 89 80 89 91 85 82 79 86

Arnold (MO) 86 93 82 70 92 79 87 87 81 81 80 86

Margaretta (MO) 80 98 90 72 91 76 91 89 86 84 79 86

Maryland Heights (MO) 88 84 94 88

4th High 8-hour Value Design Values

Table 1. Ozone Data for Select Sites in 5-State Region
7

Meteorology and Transport: Most pollutants exhibit some dependence on meteorological 

factors, especially wind direction, because that governs which sources are upwind and thus 

most influential on a given sample. Ozone is even more dependent, since its production is 

driven by high temperatures and sunlight, as well as precursor concentrations (see, for 

example, Figure 2). 

Figure 2. Number of hot days and 8-hour “exceedance” days in 5-state region

Qualitatively, ozone episodes in the region are associated with hot weather, clear skies 

(sometimes hazy), low wind speeds, high solar radiation, and southerly to southwesterly winds. 

These conditions are often a result of a slow-moving high pressure system to the east of the 

region. The relative importance of various meteorological factors is discussed later in this 

section.

Transport of ozone (and its precursors) is a significant factor and occurs on several spatial 

scales. Regionally, over a multi-day period, somewhat stagnant summertime conditions can 

lead to the build-up in ozone and ozone precursor concentrations over a large spatial area. This

pollutant air mass can be advected long distances, resulting in elevated ozone levels in 

locations far downwind. An example of such an episode is shown in Figure 3. 

Figure 3. Example of elevated regional ozone concentrations (June 23 – 25, 2005)

Note: hotter colors represent higher concentrations, with orange representing concentrations above the 8-

hour standard
8

Locally, emissions from urban areas add to the regional background leading to ozone 

concentration hot spots downwind. Depending on the synoptic wind patterns (and local landlake breezes), different downwind areas are affected (see, for example, Figure 4).

Figure 4. Examples of recent high ozone days in the Lake Michigan area

Note: hotter colors represent higher concentrations, with orange representing concentrations above the 8-

hour standard

Aloft (aircraft) measurements in the Lake Michigan area also provide evidence of elevated 

regional background concentrations and “plumes” from urban areas. For one example summer 

day (August 20, 2003 – see Figure 5), the incoming background ozone levels were on the order 

of 80 – 100 ppb and the downwind ozone levels over Lake Michigan were on the order of 100 -

150 ppb (STI, 2004).

Figure 5. Aircraft ozone measurements over Lake Michigan (left) and along upwind boundary 

(right) – August 20, 2003 (Note: aircraft measurements reflect instantaneous values)
9

As discussed in Section 4, residual nonattainment is projected in at least one area in the 5-state 

region –i.e., western Michigan. To understand the source regions likely impacting high ozone 

concentrations in western Michigan and estimate the impact of these source regions, two simple 

transport-related analyses were performed.

First, back trajectories were constructed using the HYSPLIT model for high ozone days (8-hour 

peak > 80 ppb) during the period 2002-2006 in western Michigan to characterize general

transport patterns. Composite trajectory plots for all high ozone days based on data from three 

sites (Cass County, Holland, and Muskegon) are provided in Figure 6. The plots point back to 

areas located to the south-southwest (especially, northeastern Illinois and northwestern Indiana) 

as being upwind on these high ozone days.

Figure 6 Back trajectory analysis showing upwind areas associated with high ozone

concentrations

Second, to assess the impact from Chicago/NW Indiana, Blanchard (2005a) compared ozone 

concentrations upwind (Braidwood, IL), within Chicago (ten sites in the City), and downwind 

(Holland and Muskegon) for days in 1999 – 2002 with southwesterly winds - i.e., transport 

towards western Michigan. Figure 7 shows the distribution of daily peak 8-hour ozone 

concentrations by day-of-week, with a line connecting the mean values. The difference 

between day-of-week mean values at downwind and upwind sites indicates that Chicago/NW 

Indiana contributes about 10-15 ppb to downwind ozone levels.
10

Figure 7. Mean day-of-week peak 8-hour ozone concentrations at sites upwind, within, and 

downwind of Chicago, 1999 – 2002 (southwesterly wind days)

Based on this information, the following key findings related to transport can be made:

• Ozone transport is a problem affecting many portions of the eastern U.S. The Lake 

Michigan area (and other areas in the LADCO region) both receive high levels of 

incoming (transported) ozone and ozone precursors from upwind source areas on many 

hot summer days, and contribute to the high levels of ozone and ozone precursors 

affecting downwind receptor areas.

• The presence of a large body of water (i.e., Lake Michigan) influences for the formation 

and transport of ozone in the Lake Michigan area. Depending on large-scale synoptic 

winds and local-scale lake breezes, different parts of the area experience high ozone 

concentrations. For example, under southerly flow, high ozone can occur in eastern 

Wisconsin, and under southwesterly flow, high ozone can occur in western Michigan. 

• Downwind shoreline areas around Lake Michigan are affected by both regional transport 

of ozone and subregional transport from major cities in the Lake Michigan area. 

Counties along the western shore of Michigan (from Benton Harbor to Traverse City, and 

even as far north as the Upper Peninsula) are impacted by high levels of incoming 

(transported) ozone.
11

Data Variability: Since 1980, considerable progress has been made to meet the previous 1-

hour ozone standard. Figure 8 shows the decline in both the 1-hour and 8-hour design values 

for the 5-state LADCO region over the last 25 years. 

Figure 8 Ozone design value trends in 5-State region

The trend is more dramatic for the higher ozone sites in the 5-state region (see Figure 9). This 

plot shows a pronounced downward trend in the design value since the 2001-2003 period, due, 

in part, to the very low 4th high values in 2004.

 

Figure 9. Trend in ozone design values and 4th high values for higher ozone sites in region

The improvement in ozone concentrations is also seen in the decrease in the number of sites

measuring nonattainment over the past 15 years in the Lake Michigan area (see Figure 10).

75

85

95

105

'95-'97 '96-'98 '97-'99 '98-'00 '99-'01 '00-'02 '01-'03 '02-'04 '03-'05 '04-'06 '05-'07

65

75

85

95

105

115

'95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07

Design Values

4

th High Values
12

 

Figure 10. Ozone design value maps for 1995-1997, 2000-2002, and 2005-2007
13

Given the effect of meteorology on ambient ozone levels, year-to-year variations in meteorology 

can make it difficult to assess trends in ozone air quality. Two approaches were considered to 

adjust ozone trends for meteorological influences: an air quality-meteorology statistical model 

developed by EPA (i.e., Cox method), and statistical grouping of meteorological variables 

performed by LADCO (i.e., Classification and Regression Trees, or CART).

Cox Method: This method uses a statistical model to ‘remove’ the annual effect of meteorology 

on ozone (Cox and Chu, 1993). A regression model was fit to the 1997-2007 data to relate daily 

peak 8-hour ozone concentrations to six daily meteorological variables plus seasonal and 

annual factors (Kenski, 2008a). Meteorological variables included were daily maximum 

temperature, mid-day average relative humidity, morning and afternoon wind speed and wind 

direction. The model is then used to predict 4th high ozone values. By holding the 

meteorological effects constant, the long term trend can be examined independently of 

meteorology. Presumably, any trend reflects changes in emissions of ozone precursors. 

Figure 11a shows the meteorologically-adjusted 4th high ozone concentrations for several 

monitors near major urban areas in the region. The plots indicate a general downward trend 

since the late 1990s for most cities, indicating that recent emission reductions have had a 

positive effect in improving ozone air quality. 

A similar model was run to examine meteorologically adjusted trends in seasonal average 

ozone. This model incorporates more meteorological variables, including rain and long-distance 

transport (direction and distance). Model development was documented in Camalier et al., 

2007. The seasonal average trends are shown in Figure 11b. Trends determined by seasonal

model for the same set of sites examined above are consistent with those developed by the 4

th

high model.
14

Chiwaukee, WI Sheboygan, WI

Cleveland (Ashtabula), OH Cincinnati (Sycamore), OH

Detroit (New Haven), MI St. Louis, MO

Indianapolis, IN

Figure 11a. Trends in meteorologically 

adjusted 4th high 8-hour ozone 

concentrations for seven Midwestern sites

(1997 – 2007)
15

Chiwaukee, WI Sheboygan, WI

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

20

40

60

80

Seasonal Average Ozone (ppb)

Adjusted for Weather

Unadjusted for Weather

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

20

40

60

80

Seasonal Average Ozone (ppb)

Adjusted for Weather

Unadjusted for Weather

Cleveland (Ashtabula), OH Cincinnati (Sycamore), OH

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

20

40

60

80

Seasonal Average Ozone (ppb)

Adjusted for Weather

Unadjusted for Weather

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

20

40

60

80

Seasonal Average Ozone (ppb)

Adjusted for Weather

Unadjusted for Weather

Detroit (New Haven), MI St. Louis, MO

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

20

40

60

80

Seasonal Average Ozone (ppb)

Adjusted for Weather

Unadjusted for Weather

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

20

40

60

80

Seasonal Average Ozone (ppb)

Adjusted for Weather

Unadjusted for Weather

Indianapolis, IN

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

20

40

60

80

Seasonal Average Ozone (ppb)

Adjusted for Weather

Unadjusted for Weather

Figure 11b. Trends in seasonal 8-hour ozone 

concentrations for seven Midwestern sites

(1997 – 2007)
16

CART: Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis is another statistical technique 

which partitions data sets into similar groups (Breiman et al., 1984). CART analysis was 

performed using data for the period 1995-2007 for 22 selected ozone monitors with current 8-

hour design values close to or above the standard (Kenski, 2008b). The CART model searches 

through 60 meteorological variables to determine which are most efficient in predicting ozone. 

Although the exact selection of predictive variables changes from site to site, the most common 

predictors were temperature, wind direction, and relative humidity. Only occasionally were

upper air variables, transport time or distance, lake breeze, or other variables significant. (Note, 

the ozone and meteorological data for the CART analysis are the same as used in the EPA/Cox 

analysis.)

For each monitor, regression trees were developed that classify each summer day (MaySeptember) by its meteorological conditions. Similar days are assigned to nodes, which are 

equivalent to branches of the regression tree. Ozone time series for the higher concentration

nodes are plotted for select sites in Figure 12. By grouping days with similar meteorology, the 

influence of meteorological variability on the trend in ozone concentrations is partially removed; 

the remaining trend is presumed to be due to trends in precursor emissions or other nonmeteorological influences. Trends over the 13-year period at most sites were found to be 

declining, with the exception of Detroit which showed fairly flat trends. Comparison of the 

average of the high concentration node values for 2001-2003 v. 2005-2007 showed an 

improvement of about 5 ppb across all sites (even Detroit).

The effect of meteorology was further examined by using an ozone conduciveness index

(Kenski, 2008b). This metric reflects the variability from the 13-year average in the number of 

days in the higher ozone concentration nodes (see Figure 13). Examination of these plots 

indicates:

• 2002 and 2005 were both above normal, with 2002 tending to be more severe; and

• 2001-2003 and 2005-2007 were both above normal, with no clear pattern in which 

period was more severe (i.e., ozone conduciveness values were similar at most sites, 

2001-2003 values were higher at a few sites, and 2005-2007 values were higher at a 

few sites).

Given the similarity in ozone conduciveness between 2001-2003 and 2005-2007, the 

improvement in ozone levels noted above is presumed to be due to non-meteorological factors 

(i.e., emission reductions).

In conclusion, all three statistical approaches (CART and the two nonlinear regression models) 

show a similar result; ozone in the urban areas of the LADCO region has declined during the 

1997-2007 period, even when meteorological variability is accounted for. The decreases are 

present whether seasonal average ozone, peak values (annual 4th highs), or a subset of high 

days with similar meteorology are considered. The consistency in results across models is a 

good indication that these trends reflect impacts of emission control programs.
17

Chiwaukee, WI Sheboygan, WI

Cleveland (Ashtabula), OH Cincinnati (Sycamore), OH

Detroit (New Haven), MI St. Louis, MO

Indianapolis, IN

Figure 12. Trends for higher ozone CART 

groups (average ozone > 65 ppb) for seven 

Midwestern sites (1995 – 2007)

Note: line represents linear best fit
18

Figure 13. Ozone conduciveness index (and 

number of high ozone days) for seven 

Midwestern site (1995 – 2007)
19

Precursor Sensitivity: Ozone is formed from the reactions of hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides 

under meteorological conditions that are conducive to such reactions (i.e., warm temperatures 

and strong sunlight). In areas with high VOC/NOx ratios, typical of rural environments (with low 

NOx), ozone tends to be more responsive to reductions in NOx. Conversely, in areas with low 

VOC/NOx ratios, typical of urban environments (with high NOx), ozone tends to be more 

responsive to VOC reductions. 

An analysis of VOC and NOx-limitation was conducted with the ozone MAPPER program, which 

is based on the Smog Production (SP) algorithm (Blanchard, et al., 2003). The “Extent of 

Reaction” parameter in the SP algorithm provides an indication of VOC and NOx sensitivity:

Extent Range Precursor Sensitivity

< 0.6 VOC-sensitive

0.6 – 0.8 Transitional

> 0.8 NOx-sensitive

A map of the Extent of Reaction values for high ozone days is provided in Figure 14. As can be 

seen, ozone is usually VOC-limited in cities and NOx-limited in rural areas. (Data from aircraft 

measurements suggest that ozone is usually NOx-limited over Lake Michigan and away from 

urban centers on days when ozone in the urban centers is VOC-limited.) The highest ozone 

days were found to be NOx-limited. This analysis suggests that a NOx reduction strategy would 

be effective in reducing ozone levels. Examination of day-of-week concentrations, however,

raises some question about the effectiveness of NOx reductions.

Figure 14. Mean afternoon extent of reaction (1998 – 2002)