902 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 5 / Monday, January 8, 2024 / Notices 

1See Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from 

Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 88 FR 20481 

(April 6, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order; 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from United 

Kingdom, Taiwan, and South Korea, 64 FR 40555 

(July 27, 1999) (Order). 

3The domestic interested parties are Outokumpu 

Stainless USA, LLC and North American Stainless 

(hereinafter, domestic interested parties). 

4See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Case 

Brief Submitted on Behalf of Domestic Interested 

Parties,’’ dated May 8, 2023; See CME’s Letter, 

‘‘CME Reply Brief in Support of Commerce’s 

Preliminary Results,’’ dated May 15, 2023. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Fourth Extension of 

Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated December 12, 2023; 

see also Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated July 27, 2023; and Memorandum, 

‘‘Second Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

October 26, 2023; and Memorandum, ‘‘Third 

Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

November 29, 2023. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2020– 

2021 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in 

Coils from Taiwan,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ 

dated October 7, 2022. 

8See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 20482. 

9See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian 

Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 

(May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal 

from the Russian Federation: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 

56989 (September 17, 2010). 

10See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 2. 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

V. Currency Conversion 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–00083 Filed 1–5–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–831] 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils 

From Taiwan: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Final Determination of No 

Shipments; 2021–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

the producers/exporters subject to this 

administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR), 

July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022. 

Additionally, Commerce determines 

that four companies for which we 

initiated a review had no shipments 

during the POR. 

DATES: Applicable January 8, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rebecca Janz, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2972. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 6, 2023, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

Preliminary Results of the 2021–2022 

administrative review 1 of the 

antidumping duty order on Stainless 

Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from 

Taiwan.2 In May 2023, domestic 

interested parties 3 and CME 

Acquisitions (CME), an importer of the 

subject merchandise, submitted case 

and rebuttal briefs.4 On December 12, 

2023, Commerce extended the time 

period for issuing the final results of 

this review until December 29, 2023.5

For a complete description of the events 

that occurred since the Preliminary 

Results, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.6 Commerce conducted 

this administrative review in 

accordance with section 751 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

This review covers 61 producers and/ 

or exporters of the subject merchandise. 

Commerce selected two companies, 

Lien Kuo Metal Industries Co., Ltd. 

(Lien Kuo) and S More Steel Materials 

Co., Ltd. (S More) for individual 

examination.7 Four companies, Yieh 

Mau Corporation (Yieh Mau), Yuen 

Chang Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. (Yuen 

Chang), and Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., 

Ltd. (Yieh Phui), and Yieh United Steel 

Corporation (YUSCO) reported having 

no shipments during the POR, see 

‘‘Determination of No Shipments’’ 

section below. The remaining producers 

and/or exporters not selected for 

individual examination are listed in the 

‘‘Final Results of the Review’’ section of 

this notice. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the Order 

is certain stainless steel sheet and strip 

in coils from Taiwan. A complete 

description of the scope of the Order is 

contained in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this 

administrative review are addressed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

and are listed in the appendix to this 

notice. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

preliminarily determined that Yieh Mau 

Corporation (Yieh Mau), Yieh Phui 

Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh Phui), Yuen 

Chang Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. (Yuen 

Chang), and Yieh United Steel 

Corporation (YUSCO) made no 

shipments of subject merchandise into 

the United States during the POR.8 We 

received no comments from interested 

parties regarding our preliminary 

determination and do not have any 

information on the record to contradict 

this determination. Therefore, we 

continue to find that Yieh Mau, Yieh 

Phui, Yuen Chang, and YUSCO made no 

shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR. Accordingly, consistent 

with Commerce’s practice, we intend to 

instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to liquidate any 

existing entries of subject merchandise 

produced by Yieh Mau, Yieh Phui, 

Yuen Chang, or YUSCO, but exported 

by other parties, at the rate for the 

intermediate reseller, if available, or at 

the all-others rate.9

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding the Preliminary 

Results, we revised the weighted 

average margin assigned to the 

respondents not selected for individual 

examination.10 For detailed 

information, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Rate for Non-Selected Respondents 

For the rate assigned to companies not 

selected for individual examination in 

an administrative review, generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 5 / Monday, January 8, 2024 / Notices 903 

11See Appendix II for a full list of companies not 

individually examined in this review. 12See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 13See Order. 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ Under section 

735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, if the estimated 

dumping margins established for all 

exporters and producers individually 

investigated are zero or de minimis 

margins, or are determined entirely 

under section 776, the administering 

authority may use any reasonable 

method to establish the estimated allothers rate for exporters and producers 

not individually investigated, including 

averaging the dumping margins 

determined for the exporters and 

producers individually investigated. 

For the final results of this 

administrative review, we continue to 

base the weighted-average dumping 

margins for Lien Kuo and S More the 

mandatory respondents in this review, 

entirely on facts otherwise available 

with adverse inferences (AFA). 

However, while we preliminarily found 

that it was not appropriate to assign this 

rate to the non-selected companies 

under review, for these final results of 

review, we find that the mandatory 

respondents’ AFA rate is reasonably 

reflective of non-selected companies’ 

potential dumping margins during the 

POR. Therefore, we are assigning a 

margin of 21.10 percent to the 

companies not individually examined 

(see Appendix II for a full list of these 

companies). For further discussion, see 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Final Results of Review 

As a result of this review, we 

determine that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period July 1, 2021, through June 30, 

2022: 11

Exporter and/or producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Lien Kuo Metal Industries Co., 

Ltd ........................................... 21.10 

S More Steel Materials Co., Ltd 21.10 

Companies Not Individually Examined .................................... 21.10 

Disclosure 

Normally, Commerce discloses to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed in connection with the final 

results within five days of any public 

announcement or, if there is no public 

announcement, within five days of the 

date of publication of the notice of the 

final results in the Federal Register, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

However, because Commerce applied 

total AFA to the mandatory respondents 

in this administrative review, and the 

applied AFA rate is based on a rate 

calculated for a respondent in a prior 

segment of this proceeding, there are no 

calculations to disclose. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. For the 

companies that were not selected for 

individual examination, we will instruct 

CBP to assess antidumping duties at the 

assessment rate assigned to the 

companies, based on the methodology 

described in the ‘‘Rate for Non-Selected 

Companies’’ section, above. The final 

results of this review shall be the basis 

for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise 

covered by the final results of this 

review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.12

As indicated above, for Yieh Mau, 

Yieh Phui, Yuen Chang, and YUSCO, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate any 

existing entries of merchandise 

produced by these companies, but 

exported by other parties, at the rate for 

the intermediate reseller, if available, or 

at the all-others rate. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Upon publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register, the following cash 

deposit requirements will be effective 

for all shipments of the subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of this administrative review, as 

provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the 

companies subject to this review will be 

equal to the weighted-average dumping 

margin established in the final results of 

this review; (2) for merchandise 

exported by producers or exporters not 

covered in this review but covered in a 

prior completed segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published in the completed segment for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

LTFV investigation, but the producer 

has been covered in a prior completed 

segment of this proceeding, then the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established in the completed segment 

for the most recent period for the 

producer of the merchandise; and (4) 

the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 12.61 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the LTFV investigation 

for this proceeding.13 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of doubled antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
904 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 5 / Monday, January 8, 2024 / Notices 

14Stainless steel sheet and strip in coils produced 

and exported by Tung Mung Development Co., Ltd. 

were excluded from the Order, effective October 16, 

2002. See Notice of Amended Final Determination 

in Accordance with Court Decision of the 

Antidumping Duty Investigation of Stainless Steel 

Sheet and Strip in Coils from Taiwan, 69 FR 67311, 

67312 (November 17, 2004). Accordingly, the rate 

assigned for Tung Mung Development Co., Ltd. in 

this review is only for where the company was the 

producer or exporter of subject merchandise but not 

both. 

Dated: December 29, 2023. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Application of Facts Available 

with an Adverse Inference 

Comment 2: Rate Assigned to the NonSelected Companies 

VI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

List of Companies Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

1. Broad International Resources Ltd. 

2. Chain Chon Industrial Co., Ltd. 

3. Cheng Feng Plastic Co., Ltd. 

4. Chia Far Industrial Factory Co., Ltd. 

5. Chien Shing Stainless Co. 

6. China Steel Corporation 

7. Chung Hung Steel Corp 

8. Chyang Dah Stainless Co., Ltd. 

9. Dah Shi Metal Industrial Co., Ltd. 

10. Da-Tsai Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. 

11. DB Schenker (HK) Ltd. Taiwan Branch. 

12. DHV Technical Information Co., Ltd. 

13. Froch Enterprises Co., Ltd. 

14. Gang Jou Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

15. Genn Hann Stainless Steel Enterprise Co., 

Ltd. 

16. Goang Jau Shing Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

17. Goldioceans International Co., Ltd. 

18. Gotosteel Ltd. 

19. Grace Alloy Corp. 

20. Hung Shuh Enterprises Co., Ltd. 

21. Hwang Dah Steel Inc. 

22. Jie Jin Stainless Steel Industry Co., Ltd. 

23. JJSE Co., Ltd. 

24. KNS Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

25. Lancer Ent. Co., Ltd. 

26. Lien Chy Laminated Metal Co., Ltd. 

27. Lih Chan Steel Co., Ltd. 

28. Lung An Stainless Steel Ind. Co., Ltd. 

29. Master United Corp. 

30. Maytun International Corp. 

31. NKS Steel Ind. Ltd. 

32. PFP Taiwan Co., Ltd. 

33. Po Chwen Metal. 

34. Prime Rocks Co., Ltd. 

35. Shih Yuan Stainless Steel Enterprise Co., 

Ltd. 

36. Silineal Enterprises Co., Ltd. 

37. Stanch Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. 

38. Ta Chen Stainless Pipe Co., Ltd. 

39. Tah Lee Special Steel Co., Ltd. 

40. Taiwan Nippon Steel Stainless. 

41. Tang Eng Iron Works. 

42. Teng Yao Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd. 

43. Tibest International Inc. 

44. Ton Yi Industrial Corp 

45. Tsai See Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

46. Tung Mung Development Co., Ltd.14

47. Vasteel Enterprises Co., Ltd. 

48. Vulcan Industrial Corporation. 

49. Wuu Jing Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

50. Yc Inox Co., Ltd. 

51. Yes Stainless International Co., Ltd. 

52. Yieh Trading Corp. 

53. Yu Ting Industries Co., Ltd. 

54. Yue Seng Industrial Co., Ltd. 

55. Yung Fa Steel & Iron Industry Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2024–00086 Filed 1–5–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

Review and Approval; Comment 

Request; NIST Associates Information 

System (NAIS) 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology (NIST), Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of information collection, 

request for comment. 

SUMMARY: The Department of 

Commerce, in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA), invites the general public and 

other Federal agencies to comment on 

proposed, and continuing information 

collections, which helps us assess the 

impact of our information collection 

requirements and minimize the public’s 

reporting burden. The purpose of this 

notice is to allow for 60 days of public 

comment preceding submission of the 

collection to OMB. 

DATES: To ensure consideration, 

comments regarding this proposed 

information collection must be received 

on or before March 8, 2024. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit written comments by 

mail to Maureen O’Reilly, Management 

Analyst, NIST to PRAcomments@

doc.gov. Please reference OMB Control 

Number 0693–0067 in the subject line of 

your comments. Do not submit 

Confidential Business Information or 

otherwise sensitive or protected 

information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information or 

specific questions related to collection 

activities should be directed to Xinyun 

(Cindy) Gong, IT Specialist, DOC/NIST/ 

TPO 100 Bureau Dr., Gaithersburg, MD 

20899, Mailstop 2200, 301–975–4313, 

cindy.gong@nist.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Abstract 

NIST Associates (NA) will include 

guest researchers, research associates, 

contractors, and other non-NIST 

employees that require access to NIST 

campuses or NIST resources. The NIST 

Associates Information System (NAIS) 

information collection instrument(s) are 

completed by the incoming NAs. The 

NAs will be requested to provide 

personal identifying data including 

home address, date and place of birth, 

gender, passport number, Issuing 

Country, Passport Expiration date, 

employer name and address, and basic 

security information, and provide CV/ 

Resume and Passport ID page along with 

other pertinent data information. The 

data provided by the collection 

instruments will be inputted into NAIS, 

which automatically populates the 

appropriate forms, and is routed 

through the approval process. NIST’s 

Office of Security receives security 

forms through the NAIS process and is 

able to allow preliminary access to NAs 

to the NIST campuses or resources. The 

data collected will also be the basis for 

further security investigations as 

necessary. 

II. Method of Collection 

The information is collected in paper 

format. 

III. Data 

OMB Control Number: 0693–0067. 

Form Number(s): None. 

Type of Review: Revision of a current 

information collection. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

4,000. 

Estimated Time per Response: 35–40 

minutes. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 2,083. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost to 

Public: $0. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. 

IV. Request for Comments 

We are soliciting public comments to 

permit the Department/Bureau to: (a) 

Evaluate whether the proposed 

information collection is necessary for 

the proper functions of the Department, 

including whether the information will 

have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the 

accuracy of our estimate of the time and 

cost burden for this proposed collection, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; (c) 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1