alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark Meller, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.


                                       Date: February 17, 2009

                                       By /s/ Mark Meller
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Mark Meller
                                       President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Principal Accounting Officer
#### Arthur E. OELAND, Administrator of the Estate of Edward L. Boedeker, deceased, Appellant, (Plaintiff below), v. NEUMAN TRANSIT COMPANY and Kenneth Boyer, Appellees, (Defendants below). Arthur E. OELAND, Administrator of the Estate of Bernard Fuller, deceased, Appellant, (Plaintiff below), v. NEUMAN TRANSIT COMPANY and Kenneth Boyer, Appellees, (Defendants below).

Nos. 2977, 2978.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Jan. 16, 1962.

*968Robert R. Rose, Jr., Casper, for appellant.

Edward E. Murane, of Murane, Bost-yñck & McDaniel, Casper, for appellees.

' Before BLUME, C. J., and PARKER, HARNSBERGER, and McINTYRE, JJ.

'PER CURIAM.

In petitioning for rehearing appellees challenge the accuracy of statements appearing in bur original opinion giving •summary of testimony by the only surviving ' eyewitness of the accident.

Under such circumstances we meticulously reexamined the criticized statements of the opinion and carefully compared them with the witness’ testimony as it appears in the record. By doing so we not only find the summarized statements in the opinion to be completely accurate and justified, but that the testimonies relied upon were not taken out of the context of the line of examination in which they were given nor were they assumptions unauthorized by statements of the witness.

Complaint is also made that the province of the jury has been invaded as to the credibility of the surviving witness and the rule requiring acceptance of the testimony most favorable to the prevailing party has been violated. Both these matters were considered in the opinion and held to be subject to an exception where the testimony was contrary to physical facts.

The final contention of the rehearing petition is that the alleged error of giving an instruction was considered where no objections were made or dictated into the record prior to reading the instructions to the jury contrary to Rule 51, Wjmming Rules of Civil Procedure, which in part provides:

> “ * * * All instructions given by the court shall be in writing, numbered and signed by the judge and then submitted to the parties, who may make objections thereto before they are given to the jury stating distinctly the grounds of objection. Only the grounds so specified shall be entitled to consideration on motion for a new trial or on appeal. * * * ”

This provision was intended to insure that the trial judge was informed of the nature and grounds of the objection offered so as to more properly rule upon the same. Where, as is true in this case, the record shows a motion was made to allow an oral objection made to the instruction prior to its submission to' the jury and the court by its order allowed the objection to the questioned instruction, it *969seems obvious that the trial court deemed itself sufficiently advised of the nature and grounds of the objection. Where the spirit of the rule has been observed, its letter may be waived.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

Denied.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Kay L. Toolson, CEO of Monaco Coach Corporation,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that the Annual Report of Monaco Coach Corporation on Form 10-K for theyear ended January 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Annual Report of Monaco Coach Corporation on Form 10-K fairlypresents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Monaco Coach Corporation.

 
|           | By:    | /s/  Kay L. Toolson |   |
|----------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|           |   | Kay L. Toolson           |
| March 16, 2004 |   | Chief Executive Officer  |

 

I, P. Martin Daley, CFO of Monaco Coach Corporation,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that the Annual Report of Monaco Coach Corporation on Form 10-K for theyear ended January 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Annual Report of Monaco Coach Corporation on Form 10-K fairlypresents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Monaco Coach Corporation.

 
|           | By:    | /s/  P. Martin Daley |   |
|----------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
| March 16, 2004 |   | P. Martin Daley           |
|           |   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1613-E1614]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

CONGRATULATING MS. DIANE SCHRIER FOR COMPLETING THE NATIONAL GALLERY OF 
                     ART'S SUMMER TEACHER INSTITUTE

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. DANIEL WEBSTER

                               of florida

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. WEBSTER. Mr. Speaker, it is my pleasure to recognize Ms. Diane 
Schrier of Ocala, Florida, a teacher at Fort King Middle School, upon 
her completion of the National Gallery of Art's Annual Summer Teacher 
Institute. During the National Gallery's six-day seminar, Ms. Schrier 
intensively studied the foundation of twentieth-century art by 
examining the pioneering artists of French impressionism and post-
impressionism.
  In order for participants to be accepted in to the Gallery's Teacher 
Institute seminar, they must first complete a rigorous application 
process. Ms. Schrier was one of only forty-five teachers from across 
the nation chosen to participate in this year's National Gallery of 
Art's Teacher Institute. From this seminar, teachers are able to return 
to their schools and students with new tools and ideas that will 
enhance education curriculum of all grade levels and subjects. The 
students of Central Florida are blessed to have such a dedicated 
educator as Ms. Schrier.
  On behalf of the citizens of Central Florida, I am pleased to 
recognize and congratulate Ms. Diane Schrier on her acceptance to and 
successful completion of the National Gallery of Art's Annual Summer 
Teacher Institute. May her dedication to our nation's educational 
institutions and students inspire others to follow in her footsteps.

[[Page E1614]]

                          ____________________
```
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4890 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

9801 Apollo Drive in Upper Marlboro, Maryland, as the ‘‘Wayne K. 

Curry Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2018 

Mr. BROWN of Maryland (for himself, Mr. HOYER, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. DELANEY, and Mr. 

RASKIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 9801 Apollo Drive in Upper Marlboro, Maryland, as the ‘‘Wayne K. Curry Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WAYNE K. CURRY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 9801 Apollo Drive in Upper 

6 Marlboro, Maryland, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Wayne K. Curry Post Office Building’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4890 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Wayne K. Curry Post 

5 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4722 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 464
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4722

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2018

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             June 14, 2018

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 111 Market Street in Saugerties, New York, as the ``Maurice D. 
                    Hinchey Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAURICE D. HINCHEY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 111 Market Street in Saugerties, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Maurice D. Hinchey Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Maurice D. 
Hinchey Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 464

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4722

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 111 Market Street in Saugerties, New York, as the ``Maurice D. 
                    Hinchey Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 14, 2018

                       Reported without amendment
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 5 (Monday, January 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00101]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12300]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Klimt Landscapes'' 
Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Klimt Landscapes'' at the Neue 
Galerie New York, in New York, New York, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural 
significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display 
within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. 
I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published 
in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ccbfa9afb8a5a3a2fef8f9f58cbfb8adb8a9e2aba3ba"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="37445254435e58590503020e77444356435219505841">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-00101 Filed 1-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-21-00366-CV

Vonda L. COLLIER,

Appellant

v.

Hayward COLLIER,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CV04756

Honorable J. Frank Davis, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF PROSECUTION. It is ORDERED that no costs shall be assessed against appellant in 

relation to this appeal because she qualifies as indigent under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

20.

SIGNED March 9, 2022.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO     SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Pictures Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Avery Pack, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: May 17, 2004

| /s/ Avery Pack                                                                             |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                            |
| Avery Pack           Principal Executive Officer and           Principal Financial Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4960 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 600
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4960

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2018

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           September 28, 2018

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 511 East Walnut Street in Columbia, Missouri, as the ``Spc. Sterling 
                 William Wyatt Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPC. STERLING WILLIAM WYATT POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 511 East Walnut Street in Columbia, Missouri, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Spc. Sterling William Wyatt Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Spc. 
Sterling William Wyatt Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 600

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4960

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 511 East Walnut Street in Columbia, Missouri, as the ``Spc. Sterling 
                 William Wyatt Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 28, 2018

                       Reported without amendment
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of GammaCan International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick Schnegelsberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


|Date: February 14, 2008 | By: | /s/ PATRICK SCHNEGELSBERG
|----------------------- | --- | -------------------------
|                        |     | Patrick Schnegelsberg    
|                        |     | Chief Executive Officer  

---
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly report of Gammacan International Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dan
J. Gelvan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

Date:  February 9, 2005                                  By: /s/ DAN J. GELVAN
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Dan J. Gelvan
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 23- 503 LT Case No. 2018

- CF

- 012187

_____________________________ R EGINALD D
. D AVIS , Appe llant,

v. S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_______ ______________________ 3.850 a ppeal from the Circuit Court f or Duval County

. Me re dith C harbula , J udge

. Re ginald D

. D avis , East P alatka , pro s e . Ashley M oody, A ttorney G e neral , an d Zachary L awton , Assi stant Attorney G eneral, Tallahassee , for A ppellee. October 31, 2023
P ER C URIAM
. A FFIRMED . W ALLIS , E ISNAUGLE , and B OATWRIGHT , JJ., concur .2 _____________________________ N ot final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
Table of Contents

Exhibit 4.18

[THE COCA-COLA COMPANY LETTERHEAD]

January 1, 2007

Industria Nacional de Gaseosas, S.A. 
Republica de Colombia

Dear Sirs:

In regards to the Bottler Agreement in force and effect since July 1, 1999 (the Agreement) entered into between you and The Coca-Cola Company (the Company), we inform you that a new bottler agreement is in the final stages of
discussion and approval among the parties, which we estimate will be executed towards the middle of June 2007, hereby the Agreement is temporarily extended from January 1, 2007 until:

June 30, 2007

With the exception of said extension, all the terms and conditions of the Agreement will continue to be fully valid and up until the expiration of said additional term, said Agreement will expire and the Bottler will no longer have the right to
claim a tacit renewal of the aforementioned.





| |  |                                                         
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Sincerely,                                              
| |  |                                                         
| |  | THE COCA-COLA COMPANY                                   
| |  |                                                         
| |  |                                                         
| |  |                                                         
| |  | __/s/___________________
      Authorized Representative

Accepted by:
INDUSTRIA NACIONAL DE 
GASEOSAS, S.A.

__/s/___________________ Authorized Representative

---