alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4689 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau 

of Reclamation within the Northport Irrigation District 

in the State of Nebraska. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4689 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. EARLY REPAYMENT OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 213 of 

3 the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390mm), 

4 any landowner within the Northport Irrigation District in 

5 the State of Nebraska (referred to in this section as the 

6 ‘‘District’’) may repay, at any time, the construction costs 

7 of project facilities allocated to the landowner’s land with8 in the District. 

9 (b) APPLICABILITY OF FULL-COST PRICING LIMITA10 TIONS.—On discharge, in full, of the obligation for repay11 ment of all construction costs described in subsection (a) 

12 that are allocated to all land the landowner owns in the 

13 District in question, the parcels of land shall not be sub14 ject to the ownership and full-cost pricing limitations 

15 under Federal reclamation law (the Act of June 17, 1902, 

16 32 Stat. 388, chapter 1093), and Acts supplemental to 

17 and amendatory of that Act (43 U.S.C. 371 et seq.), in18 cluding the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (13 U.S.C. 

19 390aa et seq.). 

20 (c) CERTIFICATION.—On request of a landowner that 

21 has repaid, in full, the construction costs described in sub22 section (a), the Secretary of the Interior shall provide to 

23 the landowner a certificate described in section 213(b)(1) 

24 of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 

25 390mm(b)(1)). 

26 (d) EFFECT.—Nothing in this section— 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4689 RFS 

1 (1) modifies any contractual rights under, or 

2 amends or reopens, the reclamation contract between 

3 the District and the United States; or 

4 (2) modifies any rights, obligations, or relation5 ships between the District and landowners in the 

6 District under Nebraska State law. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 12, 

2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
•)cPAiiTMEMT OF 

" :^ANSPORTATiON 

/'•;:r<FTOFf;RATiON3 

SERVED DECEMBER 12, 2011 -' ' ^'^^ ' ^ ^ '^ ^^ 

m u . JiJii *.-.t,!..iini.» • iJT»Hfa 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10SW0006 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSFAA-2010-0532 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On April 30, 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration (-'Complainant") filed a 

Complaint. On June 2, 2010, America Airlines, Inc. ("Respondent") filed its Answer. 

On December 8, 2011, Respondent filed a Withdrawal of Request for Hearing, citing its 

petition seeking bankruptcy..protection under the U.S. Code. .;:- " 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

aUomey may withdraw a complaint or parly may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing having been 

read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing be and is hereby 

granted; and 
2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachments - Service List 

"V 
FAA Docket No. CP1()SW0006 

(Civil Penahy Action) 

CORRECTED 

SERVICE LfST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk. AGC-430 

WilbiirWright Building—Suite 2WI000' 

ONE COPY 

Evan P. Singer, Respondent's Counsel 

JONES DAY 

2727 North HarAvood Street 

Dallas, TX 75201-1515 

TEL 214-969-5021 

FAX: 214-969-5100 

Francis C. Heil, Esq. 

American Airlines. Inc. 

1101 17^^ Street, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20036 

TEL: 202-496-5642 

FAX: 202-496-5100 

Yolanda Ayala Bernal, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Safety Enforcement Branch 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E3 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meaeham Blvd., Room 663 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

TEL: 817-222-5070 

FAX: 817-222-5945 or 5092 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative IM^' Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For ser\'ice in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Wasliington, 

DC 20591; Attenuon: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                             ALLIED HOLDINGS, INC.
                        160 Clairemont Avenue, Suite 200
                               Decatur, GA 30030

               LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T

March 27, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: Arthur Andersen LLP ("AA")

The purpose of this letter is to address the requirements of the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC") with respect to issuers that include accountant's
reports from AA issued after March 14, 2002 in filings with the SEC.

In connection with the audit of the consolidated financial statements of Allied
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2001 and for
the year then ended, AA has issued a report of independent public accountants to
the shareholders and directors of the Company dated February 25, 2002, except
with respect to the matter discussed in the fourth paragraph of Note 4, as to
which the date is March 27, 2002 (the "Report"). The Report is included in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2001.

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, the Company has
received the following written representations from AA:

         "We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Allied
         Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and for the
         year then ended and have issued our report thereon dated February 25,
         2002, except with respect to the matter discussed in the fourth
         paragraph of Note 4, as to which the date is March 27, 2002. We
         represent that this audit was subject to our quality control system for
         the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable
         assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
         professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of
         Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit, availability of
         national office consultation, and availability of personnel at foreign
         affiliates of Arthur Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the
         audit."

                                 ALLIED HOLDINGS, INC.


                                 By: /s/ Daniel H. Popky
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Daniel H. Popky
                                     Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
                                     Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
                                     Officer)
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4738 

To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to provide complaint and 

burden of proof requirements for certain actions for breach of fiduciary 

duty. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2018 

Mr. EMMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to provide 

complaint and burden of proof requirements for certain 

actions for breach of fiduciary duty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mutual Fund Litiga5 tion Reform Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4738 IH

1 SEC. 2. COMPLAINT AND BURDEN OF PROOF REQUIRE2 MENTS FOR CERTAIN ACTIONS FOR BREACH 

3 OF FIDUCIARY DUTY. 

4 Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 

5 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–35(b)) is amended by adding at the 

6 end the following: 

7 ‘‘(7) In any such action brought by a security 

8 holder of a registered investment company on behalf 

9 of such company— 

10 ‘‘(A) the complaint shall state with par11 ticularity all facts establishing a breach of fidu12 ciary duty, and, if an allegation of any such 

13 facts is based on information and belief, the 

14 complaint shall state with particularity all facts 

15 on which that belief is formed; and 

16 ‘‘(B) such security holder shall have the 

17 burden of proving a breach of fiduciary duty by 

18 clear and convincing evidence.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4811 

To provide for grants from the Attorney General to local education agencies 

to purchase and install devices that would allow for the immediate 

notification of appropriate officials in case of emergency, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 17, 2018 

Mr. BOST (for himself and Mr. SCHNEIDER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, 

and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for grants from the Attorney General to local 

education agencies to purchase and install devices that 

would allow for the immediate notification of appropriate 

officials in case of emergency, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing Our Schools 

5 Act of 2018’’. 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4811 IH

1 SEC. 2. PILOT PROGRAM. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—For each of fiscal years 2019 

3 through 2022, the Attorney General may make a grant 

4 to a local education agency to acquire and install a device 

5 that allows for immediate notification of emergency re6 sponse personnel, law enforcement, or other appropriate 

7 officials (as determined by the local education agency) in 

8 the case of an emergency, including a health emergency, 

9 reports of an assailant armed with a weapon, an act of 

10 terrorism, a natural disaster, or other similar emergency, 

11 as determined by the local education agency. 

12 (b) APPLICATION.—An application for a grant under 

13 this section shall be submitted at such time, in such man14 ner, and containing such information as the Attorney Gen15 eral may require. 

16 (c) MATCHING REQUIREMENT.—The portion of the 

17 costs of a device acquired and installed pursuant to this 

18 section that is provided by a grant under subsection (a) 

19 may not exceed 75 percent. 

20 (d) MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF GRANT.—A grant under 

21 this section may not be in an amount greater than 

22 $200,000 for fiscal year. 

23 (e) TERM OF GRANT.—A grant under this section 

24 shall be for a term of one fiscal year. 

Æ 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 14, 2012

jam 

# Order

June 14, 2012

145276 (16)

ROBERT KENNETH BURKOWSKI,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 145276
COA: 309033 ANDREW LEONE,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive f ees is considered and it
is DENIED because MCL 600.2 963 requires that a prisone r pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $89.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned
with this order. Failure to comply with this orde r shall result in the appeal not being
filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $286.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full.
The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
Exhibit 31.2

RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION



I,
Timothy G. Robinson certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Medifast, Inc.;
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date: April 30, 2015



|/s/    Timothy G. Robinson | 
|-------------------------- | 
|Timothy G. Robinson        | 
|Chief Financial Officer    |
#### Orville Franklin FREEMAN, Petitioner, v. Robert R. RAINES, Warden Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Respondent.

No. A-13128.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Jan. 10, 1962.

Orville Franklin Freeman, McAlester, pro se.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Lewis A. Wallace, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

BUSSEY, Judge.

This is an application for writ of habeas corpus by Orville Franklin Freeman, an inmate of the State Penitentiary at McAles-ter, Oklahoma. Petitioner, during the January term (1960) of the Superior Court of Okmulgee County, entered a plea of guilty to a charge of robbery for which he received a sentence of ten years in the State Penitentiary at McAlester.

Petitioner’s sole contention is that he was denied his constitutional right to a court appointed counsel and further alleges that he was destitute of funds and without means to employ counsel of his own choice and that he never received any advice from the court concerning court appointed counsel and that petitioner did not waive his constitutional right to such counsel.

We observe that the petitioner’s petition is unverified. In Binkley v. Raines, 370 P.2d 575, this court speaking through the person of John A. Brett held that: “Where the petitioner makes an unverified statement of a matter, which is in conflict with the records of the trial court, the court records are binding on the Court of Criminal Appeals.” It is shown upon the face of the judgment and sentence that petitioner was personally present and that he waived court appointed counsel in open court. Furthermore, it is shown by a copy of the court clerk’s minutes attached to petitioner’s petition as an exhibit that at the time of arraignment he was advised of his constitutional rights.

For the reasons above set out, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

NIX, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
# Health and Substance Abuse - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Lauren Wood The post Lauren Wood appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# Washington - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Mount Rogers Planning District Commission Executive Director Aaron Sizemore Email as&#105;&#122;&#101;&#x6d;&#x6f;&#x72;&#x65;&#x40;mr&#112;&#100;&#99;&#x2e;&#x6f;&#x72;&#x67;The post Mount Rogers Planning District Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2008301EN.01004301.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/43

---

Action brought on 2 September 2008 — Federcoopesca and Others v Commission

(Case T-366/08)

(2008/C 301/73)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Federazione Nazionale delle Cooperative della Pesca (Federcoopesca) (Rome, Italy); Pappalardo (Cetara, Italy); Pescatori La Tonnara (Cetara, Italy); Fedemar (Cetara, Italy); I Ciclopi di Tudisco Matteo (Catania, Italy); Testa (Catania, Italy); Pescatori San Pietro Apostolo, Camplone (Pescara, Italy), and Pesca (Pescara, Italy) (represented by: P. Cavatola, V. Cannizzaro and G. Micucci, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul Commission Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 of 12 June 2008 establishing emergency measures as regards purse seiners fishing for bluefin tuna in the Atlantic Ocean, east of longitude 45° W, and in the Mediterranean Sea; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 of 12 June 2008 establishing emergency measures as regards purse seiners fishing for bluefin tuna in the Atlantic Ocean, east of longitude 45° W, and in the Mediterranean Sea;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and principal arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-305/08 Italian Republic v Commission and Case T-313/08 Veromar di Tudisco Alfio & Salvatore snc v Commission.

Italian Republic

Commission

Veromar di Tudisco Alfio & Salvatore snc

Commission

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6336]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      MEASURES READ THE FIRST TIME

  The following bill was read the first time:

       H.R. 5949. An act to extend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 
     for five years.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1575]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   CONGRATULATIONS TO KAYLA HARRISON

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. JOHN A. BOEHNER

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Mr. BOEHNER. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to congratulate and recognize 
a native of my district, Ms. Kayla Harrison, on winning the gold medal 
at the 2012 Olympic Games in London.
  Kayla made Olympic history by becoming the first American to win a 
gold medal in judo. Her years of dedication and hard work have clearly 
paid off. She has been committed to achieving excellence which can be 
seen by her many accomplishments. Kayla won the Junior World 
Championships in 2008, was runner-up at the 2009 Junior World 
Championships, and in 2010 won the Senior World Championships. These 
results require a consistent effort day in and out.
  On behalf of the United States Congress, I proudly salute Ms. Kayla 
Harrison, on her Olympic victory. She worked incredibly hard to win an 
Olympic gold medal and will forever be remembered as the first American 
to win gold in judo.

                          ____________________
```
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 1, 2011

t0525 

# Order

June 1, 2011

142483

AMANDA JEAN ODOM, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 142483 COA: 293021 Wayne CC: 05-503671-NI CITY OF DETROIT and WAYNE COUNTY, Defendants, and

CHRISTINE KELLY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the December 14, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

M ARILYN 

### K ELLY 

### and H ATHAWAY 

### , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Exhibit 10.6.1

AMENDMENT TO

GREEN MOUNTAIN COFFEE ROASTERS, INC.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan

This Amendment to the Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan is made and entered into by Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. (the Company).

WHEREAS, the Company established the Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the Plan) effective as
of January 1, 2000; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan at
any time, subject to the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and other applicable law.

NOW THEREFORE, by adoption of this
amendment, the Company hereby amends the Plan, effective January 1, 2009, as follows:



| | 1. | Question B.4(b) of the ESOP Adoption Agreement is revised effective to include all employees of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and its subsidiaries such as
Keurig, Incorporated; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The Plans vesting schedule for Participants shall be as follows:
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------



|                          |  |                 |  
|------------------------- |  | --------------- | -
|Year(s) of Service        |  | Percent Vesting |  
|Less than 1 year -        |  | 0               | %
|1 but less than 2 years - |  | 25              | %
|2 but less than 3 years - |  | 50              | %
|3 but less than 4 years - |  | 75              | %
|4 or more years -         |  | 100             | %

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment as of January 1,
2009.



|                     |  |  |  |                                      |  |                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------
|                     |  |  |  | GREEN MOUNTAIN COFFEE ROASTERS, INC.
|                     |  |  | 
|/s/ Valerie Jennings |  |  |  | By:                                  |  | /s/ Kathryn Brooks   
|Witness              |  |  |  |                                      |  | Duly Authorized Agent