alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Counties in Bold Contain Distressed Areas

County Economic Status and Number of Distressed Areas in 

Appalachian New York, Fiscal Year 2021

County Status

Economic

Areas

Distressed

Number of

Allegany At-Risk 1

Broome Transitional 13

Cattaraugus Transitional 3

Chautauqua Transitional 6

Chemung Transitional 5

Chenango Transitional 1

Cortland Transitional 1

Delaware Transitional

Otsego Transitional 1

Schoharie Transitional

Schuyler Transitional

Steuben Transitional 2

Tioga Transitional

Tompkins Transitional 2

Appalachian Regional Commission, June 2020
Distressed Areas in Appalachian New York, 

Fiscal Year 2021

County

Census Tract 

ID Number

Allegany 9506

Broome 1

Broome 2

Broome 4

Broome 5

Broome 6

Broome 7

Broome 11

Broome 13

Broome 17

Broome 18

Broome 135

Broome 139

Broome 140

Cattaraugus 9400

Cattaraugus 9403

Cattaraugus 9617

Chautauqua 301

Chautauqua 302

Chautauqua 303

Chautauqua 305

Chautauqua 306

Chautauqua 354

Chemung 1

Chemung 2

Chemung 6

Chemung 7

Chemung 10

Chenango 9704

Cortland 9709

Otsego 5911

Steuben 9608

Steuben 9609

Tompkins 2

Tompkins 4

Appalachian Regional Commission, June 2020
STEUBEN

DELAWARE

OTSEGO

CATTARAUGUS ALLEGANY

TIOGA

BROOME

CHAUTAUQUA

CHENANGO

SCHOHARIE

TOMPKINS

CORTLAND

CHEMUNG

SCHUYLER

County Economic Status in Appalachian New York,

Fiscal Year 2021

0 25 50

Miles

Levels of

Economic Status

Distressed County

At-Risk County

Transitional County

Competitive County

Attainment County
STEUBEN

DELAWARE

OTSEGO

CATTARAUGUS ALLEGANY

TIOGA

BROOME

CHAUTAUQUA

CHENANGO

SCHOHARIE

TOMPKINS

CORTLAND

CHEMUNG

SCHUYLER

County Economic Status and Distressed Areas in

Appalachian New York, Fiscal Year 2021

N Y

P A

Levels of

Economic Status

Distressed County

At-Risk County

Distressed Area

Transitional County

Distressed Area

Competitive County

Attainment County

0 15 30

Miles
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1405-E1406]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           CONGRATULATING BARRY HUTCHINSON ON HIS RETIREMENT

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. GERALD E. CONNOLLY

                              of virginia

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to congratulate 
and honor Barry Hutchinson on his retirement from the Department of 
Defense after more than 40 years of dedicated and distinguished service 
to our country and to our men and women in uniform.
   Mr. Hutchinson began his career as a stock handler at the Andrews 
Air Force Base Commissary in Camp Springs, Maryland, in 1972. 
Throughout his years of service, he developed expertise in a wide 
variety of areas, including supply management, logistics, program 
management, and information operations. For the past 34 years, Mr. 
Hutchinson worked for the Defense Logistics Agency at Fort Belvoir, 
Virginia, where he provided exemplary leadership serving the 
Information Operations Directorate and retires as the Staff Director 
for IT Business, Licensing, and Performance Management.
   Mr. Hutchinson certainly embodies the commitment and caliber of our 
federal employees. While he will be missed in the Defense Logistics 
Agency we will continue to benefit from the expertise and work ethic he 
has imparted in his coworkers.
   Throughout his distinguished career, Mr. Hutchinson relied upon the 
support of his family. He will enjoy his well-deserved retirement with 
his wife, Joanne, daughters Krista and Kerri, grandchildren, Ashley, 
Jonathon, and Hannah, and grand dog, Cutter. He will continue serving 
his community, relying on his degree in Theology while teaching 
Christianity 101 at his local church. I ask my colleagues to join me in 
congratulating Barry Hutchinson for 40 years of honorable and valuable 
service to our nation, thanking him for his many contributions and the 
sacrifices he and his family have made, and wishing them well in all of 
their future endeavors.

[[Page E1406]]

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit  99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Colony RIH Holdings, Inc. and Resorts
International Hotel and Casino, Inc. (the "Companies") on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas J Barrack, Jr., President and
Treasurer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Thomas J. Barrack, Jr.

Thomas J. Barrack, Jr.
President and Treasurer
August 14, 2002
# C_2008223EN.01005805.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/58

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 16 June 2008 — Cyprus v Commission

(Case T-88/08) (1)

1

(2008/C 223/106)

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 7.6.2008.

1

---
Attachment 18

AMES Study

Sanitized
EXHIBIT 13.B

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Canadian Zinc Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Danesh K. Varma, Chief Financial Officer of Canadian Zinc Corporation hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



1.

The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.

The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





Date: June 30, 2006



/s/ Danesh K. Varma

Chief Financial Officer
Map Created: July 2018

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2016

Relative Per Capita Income Rates in Appalachia, 2016

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

Per capita income is a measure of the total personal income of 

an area divided by the resident population of the area. The 

percent of the U.S. average is computed by dividing the county 

per capita income by the national average and multiplying by 

100. The map uses critical breaks such as the national average 

to organize the data into groups of common values.

0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

41.3% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.9%

100.0% - 118.5%

Percent of the U.S. Average

U.S. average = $49,246

Appalachian average = $39,338

(Critical Breaks Classification)
#### MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS R. CO. v. STATE.

No. 35674.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Jan. 12, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 9, 1954.

*643Wayne R. Howell, St. Louis, 'Mo., 'G. H. Penland, Dallas, Tex., Dan M. Welch, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

James G. Welch, L. D. Thomas, Jr., Montford Johnson, Oklahoma City, for Corporation Commission.

Wilson & Wilson, Fredrick, for appel-lee.

JOHNSON, Vice Chief Justice.

This case is here, on appeal from an order of the Corporation Commission of Oklahoma refusing permission and authority to appellant, and denying it the right to discontinue operation in Oklahoma of its passenger trains Nos. 53 and 54 between the Texas-Oklahoma State line and the City of Woodward, Oklahoma, and substituting mixed train service in lieu thereof.

The factual situation herein is substantially the same as in the recent case of St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. State, Okl., 262 P.2d 168, wherein we reversed the order of the Commission because not supported by substantial evidence reasonably tending to sustain the order. The order herein is reversed on authority of that case and the syllabus of that case is adopted as the syllabus of this case, and the cause is remanded with directions to enter an order granting the application upon the terms sought.

HALLEY, C. J., and WELCH, CORN, DAVISON, and WILLIAMS, JJ„ concur.

WELCH, Justice

(concurring specially).

I concur, but only because I regard the prior decisions in St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. State, 204 Okl. 432, 230 P.2d 709, and the same parties, in Okl., 262 P.2d 168, as binding on this court and controlling upon the issues involved in this case, and thus requiring that we reverse here.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 4

- NM

- 001

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                        Certification of CEO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hanover Compressor Company
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Chad C.
Deaton, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

   /s/  Chad C. Deaton
-------------------------------------
Name:   Chad C. Deaton
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
Date:   March 31, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hanover Compressor Company and will be retained by Hanover
Compressor Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to (S)906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of (S)18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
EXHIBIT 32.1



EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Craig H. Barratt, the chief executive officer of Atheros Communications, Inc. (the
Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,:



|(i) | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 13, 2004



|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Craig H. Barratt                                                                
|Craig H. Barratt Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)
#### In the matter of James R. McINTYRE, Bankrupt. UNION JOINT STOCK LAND BANK OF DETROIT, Mich., Appellant, v. James R. McINTYRE, Bankrupt, Appellee.

No. 7082.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Oct. 13, 1939.

Edwin B. Goldsmith, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and A. G. Masters, of Detroit, Mich., for appellant.

Charles E. Harrington, of Kittanning, Pa., for appellee.

Before BIGGS, MARIS, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The order of the court below, 23 F.Supp. 342, is affirmed.
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO       SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Pictures Corp. (the    "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2003 as filed    with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,    Avery Pack, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as    adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 20, 2003
| /s/ Avery Pack                                                                                 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                |
| Avery Pack             Principal Executive Officer and             Principal Financial Officer |
Executive Officer Summary Compensation Sheet



 EXHIBIT 10.17 
  
 CASH COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
  
 The following are the annual salaries and annual bonus/commission arrangements of our named executive officers as of February 28, 2005.

  

									
	 Name

	  	 Position

	  	Salary

	  	Bonus/Commission @ Target

	  	Target Annual Earnings


	 Anthony Bettencourt
	  	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	  	$500,000	  	$175,000 Bonus	  	$675,000
	 Michael D. Mooney
	  	Senior Vice President, North American Sales and Business Development	  	$275,000	  	$175,000 Commission	  	$450,000
	 Sunil D. Nagdev
	  	Senior Vice President, Professional Services and Technical Support	  	$250,000	  	$100,000 Commission	  	$350,000
	 Hugo Sluimer
	  	Senior Vice President, International Sales and European Operations	  	*€232,000	  	*€ 218,000 Commission	  	*€450,000
	 Steven R. Springsteel
	  	Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial Officer	  	$360,000	  	$72,000 Bonus	  	$432,000



	*	Euro exchange rate as of March 31, 2005 was $ 1.2916 per €1. 

  
 Verity has adopted bonus plan whereby 25% of the annual target is earned on a quarterly basis based upon Company performance criteria determined and approved by its Board
of Directors. Payout for this bonus is done on an annual basis (typically within 90 days after May 31st), and payout
for earned bonus amounts are made only to employees of record on the date of the payout. 
  
 Verity’s Commission plan is based on annual sales quotas established at the beginning of the fiscal year and is earned and paid on a monthly basis. 
  
 Verity also pays insurance premiums paid on behalf of such executive officer for life insurance coverage in excess of a base amount of
$50,000 in coverage, other than Mr. Sluimer, in the amount of $240 per year. Named executive officers also receive stock options under Verity’s stock option plans, and participate in Verity’s Executive Health Program. 
  
 In addition to these named executive officers, we have three other executive officers who
receive base salaries and bonuses in amounts commensurate to their position and role with the Company.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 5, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 29, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 164 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-152, CP2024-158.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-29013 Filed 1-4-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 99.15


EXPERT CONSENT
 The undersigned hereby consents to (i) the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled “Prairie Creek Property Northwest Territories, Canada Technical Report for Canadian Zinc Corporation” with an effective date of June 15, 2012 and other capital cost estimate information pertaining to the Prairie Creek Property in the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) for the year ended December 31, 2013 of Canadian Zinc Corporation (the “Company”) and in the Management Discussion & Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2013 of the Company (the “MD&A”), and (ii) the use of the name, SNC-Lavalin Inc., in the AIF, the MD&A and the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto incorporating by reference the Company’s AIF and MD&A.
 Dated this 20thday of March, 2014.
 SNC-Lavalin Inc.
 /s/ SNC-Lavalin Inc.
#### MICHIGAN BUMPER CORPORATION and Michigan Bumper Corporation’s Creditors’ Committee, Appellants, v. CREDITORS OF WOLVERINE BUMPER AND SPECIALTY COMPANY, Appellees.

No. 8300.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 10, 1939.

Warner, Norcross & Judd, of Grand Rapids, Mich., Milburn & Semmes, of Detroit, Mich., and Joseph Shulsky, of Grand Rapids, Mich., for appellants.

Fred P. Geib, of Grand Rapids, Mich., for appellees.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ARANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript, briefs and argument of counsel, and it appearing that there is no reversible error on the record, it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order entered on January 31, 1939, and herein appealed from; be and the same is in all things affirmed.
# Coosa - Appalachian Regional Commission

- East Alabama Regional Planning and Development Commission Executive Director Lori Hodge Sokol Email &#x6c;&#x6f;&#x72;&#x69;&#x2e;&#x73;&#111;&#107;&#111;&#108;&#64;ear&#x70;&#x64;&#x63;&#x2e;&#x6f;&#x72;&#103;The post East Alabama Regional Planning and Development Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of NEXHORIZON COMMUNICATIONS,  INC. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Calvin D. Smiley,  Sr.,  Chief  Executive  Officer and President of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 18, 2008



By:       /s/ Calvin D. Smiley, Sr.
         -----------------------------
         Calvin D. Smiley, Sr.
         Chief Executive Officer
         and President
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4651 

To provide that the final rule of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 

titled ‘‘Home Mortgage Disclosure (Regulation C)’’ shall have no force 

or effect. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2017 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. POSEY, Mr. HARRIS, and Mr. SCHWEIKERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To provide that the final rule of the Bureau of Consumer 

Financial Protection titled ‘‘Home Mortgage Disclosure 

(Regulation C)’’ shall have no force or effect. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Let Lenders Lend 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HOME MORTGAGE DISCLOSURE RULE. 

7 The final rule issued by the Bureau of Consumer Fi8 nancial Protection titled ‘‘Home Mortgage Disclosure 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4651 IH

1 (Regulation C)’’ (October 28, 2015; 80 Fed. Reg. 66128) 

2 shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS