alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                 UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            Washington, D.C.  20549

                                   FORM 10-K/A


(Mark One)

[X]      ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
         EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

         For the fiscal year ended June 29, 1996

                                       OR

[ ]      TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
         EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 0-22144

                              INBRAND CORPORATION

            Georgia                                          58-1113677
-------------------------------                        ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of                           (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                         Identification Number)


  1169 Canton Road, Marietta, Georgia                              30066
----------------------------------------                      ----------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                         (Zip Code)

                                 (770) 422-3036
              ----------------------------------------------------
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

  Title of each class                 Name of each exchange on which registered
-----------------------               -----------------------------------------
Common stock, par value                         Nasdaq National Market
     $.10 per share

       Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                     Yes  X                No 
                         ---                  ---

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K.[ X ]

As of September 25, 1996, there were 7,840,097 shares of the Registrant's
Common Stock outstanding and the aggregate market value of such stock held by
non-affiliates of the Registrant was $231,282,861 (based upon the $29.50 per
share closing price on that date as reported by the Nasdaq National Market).
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO ANNUAL REPORT OF

LANDRYS RESTAURANTS, INC.

I, Rick H. Liem, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Landrys Restaurants, Inc.;
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 29,
2008



/s/ Rick H. Liem Rick H. Liem Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 20

- 11790

____________________
WILLIE THOMAS,
Petitioner

- Appellant,

versus SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondents

- Appellees.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 0:18

- cv

- 62348

- PCH

_________ ___________ USCA11 Case: 20-11790 Date Filed: 09/20/2022 Page: 1 of 32 Opinion of the Court 20

- 11790

Before R OSENBAUM , J ILL P RYOR , and E D C ARNES , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM : After hearing oral argument in this case, we order ed a limited remand for the district court to make fact findings relevant to the issue of whether permitting the petitioner to amend his habeas petition again would be futile. We asked the court to make credibility and fact findings about whether, if the st ate court had notmade an incorrect statement about the effect of his prior convictions, the petitioner would have changed his mind and decided to testify at trial. He wanted to amend his habeas petition to include a claim that he would have done that.
Th e district court held an evidentiary hearing at which the petitioner testified

. After considering the evidence, the court determined that the p etitioner had already made a “ firm decision not to testify in the trial ” before the state court made its erroneo us
statement about his prior convictions. The court found that the petitioner’s contrary testimony at the evidentiary hearing was not credible. His responses to questions were “ vague, evasive, and confusing, ” and they were “ inconsistent with the trial tr anscript and [his] post

- trial filings. ” In assessing credibility, the court took into consideration the petitioner’s extensive criminal history and his eleven prior felony convictions

. Based on its findings , the court concluded that allowing the petition er to amend his habeas petition another time would be futile. USCA11 Case: 20-11790 Date Filed: 09/20/2022 Page: 2 of 320

- 11790 Opinion of the Court 3

The district court found the necessary facts and made entirely reasonable credibility determinations to support its conclusion that another amendment would be futile

. Our review is limited to clear error, and “ r eview for clear error is deferential
, ” United States v. Robertson, 493 F.3d 1322, 1330 (11th Cir. 2007)

. “[W] e will not disturb a district court ’ s findings unless we are left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed .” United States v. Ghertler , 605 F.3d 1256, 1267 (11th Cir. 2010) (quotation marks omitted); accord, e.g.
, United States v. Monzo , 852 F.3d 1343, 1345 (11t h Cir. 2017)

. There is no error, much less clear error
, in the district court’s findings.
The district court’s judgment denying the petitioner leave to amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition is AFFIRMED. USCA11 Case: 20-11790 Date Filed: 09/20/2022 Page: 3 of 3
#### Samuel Gebson, Respondent, *v.*Jo White, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

May 28, 1959.

*Chester A. Lessler*for appellant.

*Beit, Beit é Altman (David Altman*of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

In this action for salary and breach of contract by a salesman against his employer, the plaintiff’s testimony is not only contrary to experience but it contradicts itself and the examination before trial. Certain inconsistencies were sought to be explained by suggestive questions on redirect examination and resulted in incredible claims. We do not seek to explain how the jury arrived at a verdict giving credit to every part of this testimony. But it cannot be allowed to stand.

In taking the action we do, we are well aware of the credit to be given to a determination of a disputed issue by the designated trier of the facts. However that credit does not amount to an obligation to accept the result regardless of the character of the testimony. It is the law today as it has been during the entire period that we have enjoyed rules of procedure that an appeal is allowable from a verdict which is against the weight of credible evidence. Blind acceptance of verdicts would nullify these statutory provisions. A verdict based on evidence fairly susceptible of two different conclusions must be accepted without regard to which conclusion would appeal to the appellate Bench. But every appellate court with jurisdiction to pass on the weight of evidence has a duty to examine that evidence. An error in regard to the facts is just as amenable to correction as one in regard to the law and it is a breach of duty to avoid it. It would, of course, lighten the task of the appellate Judge if verdicts were declared inviolate and the weight of the evidence relegated to the limbo inhibited by empty phrases. However until the Legislature so enacts, we must, within our limitations seek to obtain a result correct not only in form but in fact.

*731The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

Hofstadtbr, J.

(dissenting). I dissent and vote to affirm.

The conclusion as to the facts is not for us but was for the trial court. The record of a trial is not a mere deposition to be evaluated *de novo.*It is a usurpation of power to choose to do so in rejecting the result achieved by the trial court; for it is not within the appellate court’s competency to choose between possible results. Indeed, it is incumbent on it to exercise its province to the utmost stretch to sustain a judgment, not to disturb it — to avoid “ the monstrous penalty of a new trial ” (1 Wigmore, Evidence [3d ed.], § 21, p. 395).

Concur — Steuer, J. P., and Hecht, J.; Hofstadtbr, J., dissents in memorandum.
ALABAMA

MIDDLE SCHOOL

Mary Gautey

Alexis Jones

Gabriel Wallen

HIGH SCHOOL

Abigail Regan

GEORGIA

MIDDLE SCHOOL

Kiera Byers

HIGH SCHOOL

Emily Gunderson, teacher

KENTUCKY

MIDDLE SCHOOL

Kaden Gillum

Realena Souder

Kaylee Wilson

HIGH SCHOOL

Hannah Allen

Zoe Castle

Lucas Epperson

Asa O’Neal

Brynna Ryle, teacher

Jonathan Stephens, 

 teacher

Carla Taylor, teacher

MARYLAND

MIDDLE SCHOOL

Nathaniel Argabrite

Rebekah O’Rourke

Ella Valentine

HIGH SCHOOL

Emilia Germain

Logan Hine

Serena Lewis

Joshua Taylor

MISSISSIPPI

MIDDLE SCHOOL

Braxton Colvin

Cherish Harris

HIGH SCHOOL

India Fears

Alex Jones

NORTH CAROLINA

MIDDLE SCHOOL

Isabelle Gladson

Lauren Gottlieb

Chloelynn Little

HIGH SCHOOL

Garren Bryant

William Coffey

Jimmy Galloway

Ethan Hurley

Piper Seagle

Jasmine Swirski

Greta Waitz

NEW YORK

MIDDLE SCHOOL

Caragen Gaiser

Logan Green

Stacey Tirado-Torres

HIGH SCHOOL

Jacob Fay

Jace Gardner

Jessy Gardner

Abigail Shaffer

Miranda Carman, teacher

Audrey Hamilton, teacher

OHIO

MIDDLE SCHOOL

Randall Dunkin

Wesley Loch

Kari McCaslih

HIGH SCHOOL

Carson Bartolic

Alexander Davies

Abigail Pendell

Randall Dunkin, teacher

Brian Lewis, teacher

Michele Verdi, teacher

PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE SCHOOL

Evan Higham

Zachary Jordan

Joshua Wang

HIGH SCHOOL

Carina Beebe

Maximilian Krier

Conor Mauro

Jordan McCord-Wolbert

James Hemminger, teacher

Francis Kovscek, teacher

SOUTH CAROLINA

MIDDLE SCHOOL

Conor Fennell

Benjamin Luines

Donovan Sarlo

HIGH SCHOOL

Rebecca Cazarin

Chelsey Johnson, teacher

TENNESSEE

MIDDLE SCHOOL

Selena Ashley

Ava McCollum-Beaves

Joshua Sherrill

HIGH SCHOOL

Zoe Leger

Alyssa McGinnis

Brendan Miller

Alexis Steelman

Isaac Sulfridge

Isabella Winegar

Dawson Wright

Mary Bass, teacher

Barbara Waters, teacher

VIRGINIA

MIDDLE SCHOOL

Abigail Contreras

Rodney Hayden

David Howes

HIGH SCHOOL

Bradley Marion

Stephanie Weisberger

Nghia Nguyen, teacher

WEST VIRGINIA

MIDDLE SCHOOL

Trista Honaker

Mackenzie McNeil

Shelby Pauley

HIGH SCHOOL

Gianna Muto

Alexa Pace

Mia Sutton

Jessica Cutlip, teacher

Brandon Gerwig, teacher

Appalachian Regional Commission, June 2020

PARTICIPANTS

LEARN MORE: arc.gov/summerstem
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Krupp Government Income Trust (the
"Trust") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2001 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert A. Barrows, Chief Accounting Officer of the Trust, certify, pursuant
to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Trust as of December 31, 2001 (the last date of
               the period covered by the Report).


 /s/ Robert A. Barrows
------------------------
Robert A. Barrows,
Chief Accounting Officer
# FY 2007 - Appalachian Regional Commission

- County Economic Status in Appalachia, FY 2007 This map shows ARC’s economic classification of the 410 counties in the Appalachian Region for FY 2007 (October 1, 2006 through September 30, 2007).The post County Economic Status in Appalachia, FY 2007 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Table of Contents 





Exhibit 4.12 




March 17, 2005






Panamco Colombia, S.A.

Republic of Colombia





Ladies and Gentlemen:




In regards to the
Bottler Agreement (“the Agreement”) among you and The Coca-Cola Company (the “Company”),
we are writing to inform you that a new bottler agreement is in the final stages of
discussion and approval among the parties, which we estimate will be executed
towards the end of April 2005, at present the Agreement is temporarily extended from
March 1, 2005 until  




April 30, 2005




With the exception of
said  extension,  all the terms and  conditions of the Agreement will continue to be
fully valid and up until the expiration of said  additional  term, said Agreement will
expire and the Company will no longer have the right to claim a tacit renewal of the
aforementioned.








	 	Sincerely,
	 
	 
	 	THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
	 
	 	By:	 /S/
_____________________ 
	 	 	Name:
	 	 	Title: Vice President












Accepted by:
Panamco
Colombia, S.A.


By:   __/s/_________________

Attorney in fact
# C_2010301EN.01002601.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — KUKA Roboter v OHIM (Shade of orange)

(Case T-97/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a shade of orange - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 301/41

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: KUKA Roboter GmbH (Augsburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Kohn and B. Hannemann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Pethke, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 December 2007 (Case R 1572/2007-4), concerning an application for registration of a shade of orange as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders KUKA Roboter GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders KUKA Roboter GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 107, 26.4.2008.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6151]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. ROYCE:
       H.R. 6431.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article 1, Section 8, clause 3, which provides Congress the 
     power to ``regulate commerce with foreign Nations among the 
     several States.''
```
# C_2008183EN.01001702.xml

| 19.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/17

---

Action brought on 4 June 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-245/08)

(2008/C 183/35)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Andrade and H. Støvlbæk, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2006/100/EC (1) of 20 November 2006 adapting certain Directives in the field of freedom of movement of persons, by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania, or, in any event, by not informing the Commission thereof, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2006/100/EC (1) of 20 November 2006 adapting certain Directives in the field of freedom of movement of persons, by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania, or, in any event, by not informing the Commission thereof, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of the directive expired on 1 January 2007.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 363, p. 141.

1

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1828** 

WELLELA HIRPASSA, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Brook T. Genet and for the use of R.B., a minor , and B.B., a minor , Plaintiff

– Appe llant ,

v.
PRINCE GEORGE’ S COUNTY GOVERNMENT; DELVON MONTUE, Cpl; TROY WALLACE, Cpl; LOUIS WILLIAMS, Cpl; THOMAS HAMMILL, Cpl; ASMOREM BERHE; ADRIEN LYLE ROBINSON , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Dist rict of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Roger W. Titus , District Judge. ( 8:09

- cv - 02631

- RWT )

Submitted : December 14, 2010 Decided: December 30 , 2010

Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Wellel a Hirpassa, Appellant Pro Se. Tonia Yvetta Belton

- Gofreed, Associate County Attorney, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Wellela Hirpassa appeals the district court ’ s ord er granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants on Hirpassa’s complaint . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hirpassa v. Prince George ’s County

Gov’t , No. 8:09

- cv - 02631

- RWT (D. Md. July 9, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (the “Report”) of MCG Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, B. Hagen Saville, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:


|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/    B. HAGEN SAVILLEName:B. Hagen SavilleTitle:Chief Executive OfficerDateApril 30, 2013
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6047]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               IT IS TIME TO PUT GOVERNING OVER POLITICS

  (Mr. WITTMAN asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. WITTMAN. Mr. Speaker, I rise today with disappointment. I'm 
disappointed that this Nation's leaders have once again kicked the can 
down the road instead of making tough and important decisions on our 
Nation's spending.
  Yesterday, the House passed a continuing resolution without my vote 
to simply continue to fund government into the 2013 fiscal year at 
current levels as catastrophic cuts loom on the horizon set to hit in 
January of 2013. Sequestration, as these cuts are known, threaten our 
national security. An estimated 200,000 jobs in Virginia will be lost, 
jobs that support our warfighters and their mission around the world.
  Mr. Speaker, we have 16 days to the beginning of a new fiscal year, 
yet Congress has delayed tough decisions again. These delays are 
unconscionable. These delays are unacceptable. Congress should stay in 
Washington and stop ignoring the reality of these looming cuts.
  It is time to put governing over politics.

                          ____________________
```
# Giles - Appalachian Regional Commission

- New River Valley Planning District Commission Executive Director Kevin Byrd Email &#x6e;&#114;v&#x70;&#x64;&#99;&#64;&#x6e;&#x72;&#118;p&#x64;&#99;&#46;&#x6f;&#x72;&#103;The post New River Valley Planning District Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.