alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_______________

FORM 10-K/A

	 

[X]	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED) 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001

Commission File No. 1-12362

LIFEPOINT, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		 33-0539168

(State or other jurisdiction of	(IRS Employer

Incorporation organization)	I.D. Number)

1205 South Dupont Street

Ontario, California	 	 91761

(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number including area code:

(909) 418-3000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act:

Effective April 19, 2000, Common Stock, $.001 par value

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.001 par value

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes[X] No[ ].

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K. [ ]

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $118,188,476 (based on the closing price of Registrant's Common Stock on the American Stock Exchange at June 19, 2001, or $3.75 per share). This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As of June 19, 2001, there were 31,516,927 shares of the registrant's Common Stock and 75,000 shares of the Preferred Stock outstanding.

 

 

 

 

LIFEPOINT, INC.

FORM 10 K/A

Fiscal Year End 03/31/01

EXPLANATORY NOTE TO AMENDMENT #2

 

 

 

This amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001 has been filed to amend Exhibit 10(p) "Copy of Exclusive Distribution Agreement between LifePoint, Inc. and CMI, Inc." to include the attached schedules. Portions of the schedules have been omitted and confidential treatment has been requested by the Securities Exchange Commission. All such omitted material has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to rule 24b-2 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
# C_2009090EN.01002601.xml

| 18.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/26

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 March 2009 — Piccoli v OHIM (Shape of a sea shell)

(Case T-8/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark - Shape of a seashell - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Lack of distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94)

2009/C 90/41

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: G. M. Piccoli Srl (Alzano Lombardo, Italy) (represented by: S. Giudici and S. Caselli, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 September 2007 (Case R 530/2007-1) concerning an application to register as a Community trade mark a three-dimensional sign consisting of the shape of a sea shell.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders G. M. Piccoli Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders G. M. Piccoli Srl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         654,932
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,533,593
<ALLOWANCES>                                   135,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,007,468
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,401,347
<PP&E>                                       5,867,713
<DEPRECIATION>                                 928,511
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,088,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,530,342
<BONDS>                                      6,632,381
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,704
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,821,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,088,609
<SALES>                                     23,901,102
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,901,102
<CGS>                                       15,363,522
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,363,522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,573,438
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                36,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             561,342
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                366,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            366,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   366,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.B

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Canadian Zinc Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Danesh K. Varma, Chief Financial Officer of Canadian Zinc Corporation hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



1.

The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.

The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



Date: June 30, 2005



/s/ Danesh K. Varma

Chief Financial Officer
# C_2009220EN.01001702.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/17

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland (United Kingdom) lodged on 16 October 2008 — Seaport Investments Ltd v Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland

(Case C-454/08)

2009/C 220/30

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Seaport Investments Ltd

Applicant:

Defendant: Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland

Defendant:

By order of 20 May 2009, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) declared the reference for a preliminary ruling inadmissible.

---
#### STATE ex rel. COMMISSIONERS OF LAND OFFICE v. BRIGHT.

No. 35652.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Dec. 22, 1953.

*726R. H. Dunn, R. D. Mahan, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

J. A. Rinehart, Rinehart & Rinehart, El Reno, for defendant in error.

JOHNSON, Vice Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by the Commissioners of the Land Office of the State of Oklahoma from an adverse ruling upon its motion for judgment on the pleadings in its suit to collect an alleged balance due from defendant on a rental contract between it and the defendant.

It alleged that it leased defendant certain real property for the year of 1940, at a rental of $250, payable $125 upon execution of the lease, and $125 on the first day of July, 1940. A copy of the lease was attached to its petition as a part thereof. The lease was made subject to the right of the Commission to sell the property therein described at any time, and that upon such sale prior to the expiration of the lease, the lease should thereupon expire.

Defendant answered by general denial and, inter alia, alleged that the property covered by the lease was sold to defendant on June 25, 1940; that under the terms of the lease it expired upon date of sale and he, therefore, did not owe any further rentals.

Plaintiff replied by denying generally the allegations of defendant, and alleged that the defendant purchased the said property involved upon the terms and conditions of the notice of sale, made and published according to law; that the notice provided among other things, that each tract will be sold subject to the right of the present lessee to harvest all crops growing thereon, and the State reserved the right to collect all rentals to be due from such lessee on account of crops then growing on the premises.

Plaintiff then filed its motion for judgment on the pleadings, which was overruled as to plaintiff, and judgment rendered on the pleadings for defendant, resulting in this appeal.

The rights of the parties under the lease must be determined from the provisions of the lease. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Price, 86 Okl. 105, 206 P. 1033. Under the lease the plaintiff could sell or not as it chose and in this case it was alleged by defendant that plaintiff did sell the *727property on June 25, 1940, to defendant, which stands admitted by plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. When the lessee purchased the fee, the lease under its terms expired and likewise the relationship of landlord and tenant. Such purchase operated as a merger of the term of the lease, and as a consequence, the convenant in the lease to pay rent was extinguished. Id. 32 Am.Jur., Landlord and Tenant, § 829, et seq. and pocket parts; 19 Amjur., Estates, § 135 and 136.

Judgment affirmed.

HALLEY, C. J. and CORN, DAVISON, O’NEAL, JJ., concur.

ARNOLD, J., concurs in conclusion.

WELCH, WILLIAMS and BLACKBIRD, JJ., dissent.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 8 (Thursday, January 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1924-1925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00400]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2020-N-0026]


Issuance of Priority Review Voucher; Rare Pediatric Disease 
Product

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
issuance of a priority review voucher to the sponsor of a rare 
pediatric disease product application. The Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act)

[[Page 1925]]

authorizes FDA to award priority review vouchers to sponsors of 
approved rare pediatric disease product applications that meet certain 
criteria. FDA is required to publish notice of the award of the 
priority review voucher. FDA has determined that FILSUVEZ (birch 
triterpenes), manufactured by Amryt Pharmaceuticals, meets the criteria 
for a priority review voucher.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathryn Lee, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-1394.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is announcing the issuance of a priority 
review voucher to the sponsor of an approved rare pediatric disease 
product application. Under section 529 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 
360ff), FDA will award priority review vouchers to sponsors of approved 
rare pediatric disease product applications that meet certain criteria. 
FDA has determined that FILSUVEZ (birch triterpenes), manufactured by 
Amryt Pharmaceuticals, meets the criteria for a priority review 
voucher. FILSUVEZ (birch triterpenes) gel is indicated for the 
treatment of wounds associated with dystrophic and junctional 
epidermolysis bullosa in adult and pediatric patients 6 months of age 
and older.
    For further information about the Rare Pediatric Disease Priority 
Review Voucher Program and for a link to the full text of section 529 
of the FD&C Act, go to http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DevelopingProductsforRareDiseasesConditions/RarePediatricDiseasePriorityVoucherProgram/default.htm. For further 
information about FILSUVEZ (birch triterpenes), go to the ``Drugs@FDA'' 
website at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/.

    Dated: January 8, 2024.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-00400 Filed 1-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 21

                          Sheffield Steel Corporation
                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       State of
Name of Subsidiary                   Incorporation  D/B/A
------------------                   -------------  -----
<S>                                  <C>            <C>
Sand Springs Railroad Company        Oklahoma       Sand Springs Railroad Company

Sheffield Steel Corporation-
Oklahoma City                        Delaware       Sheffield Steel Corporation-Oklahoma City

Waddell's Rebar Fabricators, Inc.    Missouri       Waddell's Rebar Fabricators, Inc.

Wellington Industries, Inc.          Oklahoma       Wellington Industries, Inc.
</TABLE>
Table of Contents

Exhibit 4.15

[THE COCA-COLA COMPANY LETTERHEAD]

June 2, 2008

Coca-Cola FEMSA de Panamá, S.A. 
República de Panamá

Dear Sirs:

In regards to the Bottler Agreement in force and effect since November 1, 1994 (the Agreement) entered into between you and The Coca-Cola Company (the Company), we inform you that a new bottler agreement is in the final
  stages of discussion and approval among the parties, which we estimate will be executed towards the middle of September 2008, hereby the Agreement is temporarily extended from March 31, 2008 until:

September 30, 2008

With the exception of said extension, all the terms and conditions of the Agreement will continue to be fully valid until the expiration of the additional term, and once the extension expires, the Bottler will no longer have the right to claim a
  tacit renewal of the aforementioned Agreement.





| |                          
| | -------------------------
| | Sincerely,               
| |                          
| | THE COCA-COLA COMPANY    
| |                          
| |                          
| | /s/                      
| |                          
| | Authorized Representative





|                                | 
|------------------------------- | 
|Accepted by:                    | 
|COCA-COLA FEMSA DE PANAMÁ, S.A. | 
|                                | 
|                                | 
|                                | 
|/s/                             | 
|                                | 
|Authorized Representative       |
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4923 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4923

 To make exclusive the authority of the Federal Government to regulate 
 the labeling of products made in the United States and introduced in 
        interstate or foreign commerce, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2018

   Mr. Issa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make exclusive the authority of the Federal Government to regulate 
 the labeling of products made in the United States and introduced in 
        interstate or foreign commerce, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reinforcing American-Made Products 
Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSIVITY OF FEDERAL AUTHORITY TO REGULATE LABELING OF 
              PRODUCTS MADE IN THE UNITED STATES AND INTRODUCED IN 
              INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE.

    Section 320933 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act 
of 1994 (15 U.S.C. 45a) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``To the extent'' 
        and inserting the following:
    ``(a) In General.--To the extent'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Effect on State Law.--The provisions of this section shall 
supersede any provisions of the law of any State relating to the extent 
to which a product is introduced, delivered for introduction, sold, 
advertised, or offered for sale in interstate or foreign commerce with 
a `Made in the U.S.A.' or `Made in America' label, or the equivalent 
thereof, in order to represent that such product was in whole or 
substantial part of domestic origin.''; and
            (3) in the third sentence of subsection (a), as designated 
        by paragraph (1), by striking ``Nothing in this section'' and 
        inserting ``Except as provided in subsection (b), nothing in 
        this section''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Paul G. Laird, Chief Executive Officer and I, Les Bates, Chief Financial
Officer of New Frontier Energy, Inc. (the "Company") certify that:

     1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of New Frontier
Energy, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report; and

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report.

Date:  July 11, 2008



/s/ Paul G. Laird
-----------------
Paul G. Laird,
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Les Bates
-------------
Les Bates,
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, James P. Bryce, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (this Amendment No. 1); and

2. Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 30, 2009



/s/ James P. BryceJames P. Bryce Chief Executive Officer
**Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 November 2010 – Spain v Commission**

**(Case T-113/08)**

EAGGF – Guarantee Section – Expenditure excluded from Community financing – Aid for the production of olive oil – Aid for arable crop areas

1.                     *Agriculture – EAGGF – Clearance of accounts – Definitive refusal to accept responsibility for certain expenses – Need for
a prior inter partes procedure (see paras 61, 132)*

2.                     *Agriculture – EAGGF – Clearance of accounts – Communication to Member States of the results of investigations by control services
– Substantive conditions (Council Regulation No 729/70, Art. 5(2)(c); Commission Regulation No 1663/95, Art. 8(1), first para.)
(see paras 62-69)*

3.                     *Agriculture – EAGGF – Clearance of accounts – Disallowance of expenditure arising from irregularities in the application of
the Community rules – Challenge by the Member State concerned – Burden of proof – Allocation between the Commission and the
Member State (see paras 91-92, 96-97)*

4.                     *Agriculture – Common organisation of the markets – Oils and fats – Olive oil (Council Regulations Nos 154/75, 2261/84, Art.
14(3), and 1638/98, Art. 2(1) to (3); Commission Regulation No 2366/98, Art. 8(b)) (see paras 98-100, 103-106)*

5.                     *Agriculture – EAGGF – Clearance of accounts – Disallowance of expenditure arising from irregularities in the application of
the Community rules – Assessment of losses incurred by the Fund – Challenge by the Member State concerned – Burden of proof
(Council Regulation No 729/70) (see paras 108-109)*

6.                     *Agriculture – EAGGF – Clearance of accounts – Limitation of the refusal of financing – Twenty-four month period – Point from
which time starts to run – Communication by the Commission of the results of verifications (Council Regulation No 1258/1999,
Art. 7(4)) (see paras 118-123, 138)*

7.                     *Agriculture – EAGGF – Grant of aids and premiums – Obligation on Member States to organise an efficient system of administrative
controls and spot checks – Unreliable controls – Disallowance by the Fund (Commission Regulation No 2419/2001, Art. 15) (see
para. 152)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2008/68/EC of 20 December 2007 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (OJ 2008 L 18, p. 12), in so far as it relates to certain expenditure incurred by the Kingdom of Spain in the olive oil and arable crop sectors. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |