alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23


                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
The Beard Company:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
33-87110, 33-98482, and 333-06757) on Form S-8 of The Beard Company of our
report dated April 22, 1997, relating to the balance sheet of North American
Brine Resources (a 40% owned joint venture of The Beard Company) as of December
31, 1996, and the related statements of operations, Partners' equity and cash
flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 1996,
annual report on Form 10-K/A of The Beard Company.


   
                                                KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
    

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
September 9, 1997

<PAGE>   2
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                   AND REPORT ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
The Beard Company:

The audits referred to in our report dated March 19, 1997, included financial
statement Schedule II for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1996, included in the annual report Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 1996. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this
financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such
financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
33-87110, 33-98482, and 333-06757) on Form S-8 of The Beard Company of our
report dated March 19, 1997, relating to the balance sheets of The Beard 
Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, which report appears in
the December 31, 1996, annual report on Form 10-K/A of The Beard Company.



                                                KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
September 9, 1997
#### SIMMONS v. STATE.

No. A-11964.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

June 16, 1954.

Wise & Ivester, Sayre,’for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.1

BRETT, Judge.

Plaintiff in error V. A. Simmons, defendant below, was charged by information in the county court of Beckham county, Oklahoma, with the offense Of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors, Title 37 O.S. 1951 § 31. A jury was waived, the case' tried to the court, and the defendant found guilty and his punishment' set at a fine of $100 and costs and 30' days in jail. Judgment and sentence was entered accordingly, from which this appeal was taken.

The principal contention advanced by the defendant is that the trial court erred in not sustaining his motion to suppress the evidence. He contends there was an inaccurate description of the house to be searched, that the number on the house was 210 West 'Noble, Sayre, Oklahoma. The sheriff testified that he drove past the Simmons home before he procured the search warrant to verify the number and the number on the hoúse was definitely 211 West Noble at the time the search -yas made. There was some evidence to the effect that the naught on the house had been retouched with green paint to make it appear 210 West Noble. The property was further described as the residence of V. A. Simmons, a white frame house- with an unattached double garage. No other house of such description was in the vicinity of the Simmons residence. We are of the opinion there ■ was sufficient' evidence to warrant the trial court in overruling the motion to suppress. In Peterson v. State, 76 Okl.Cr. 46, 133 P.2d 914, it was held:

> “In hearing on motion to suppress evidence, court’s finding on disputed question of fact as to whether search warrant sufficiently described defendant’s premises will be sustained where there is competent evidence in record to support finding.” . . ■

The defendant further' contends that the search warrant was'- not served. *458This question was not raised in the trial of the case. The return on the warrant introduced by counsel for the defendant recited that the warrant had been served. No evidence was offered to impeach the same. In this connection it has been held that the law presumes the legality and regularity of all proceedings and accused who is charged with a violation of the prohibitory laws and raises the question of the invalidity of the search and seizure of contraband must assume the burden to introduce evidence to show the invalidity of the search. Pierce v. State, Okl.Cr., 253 P.2d 194. The defendant herein offered no evidence to the effect that the warrant had not been served. For all the above and foregoing reasons the judgment and sentence herein are accordingly affirmed.

POWELL, P. J., and TONES, J., concur.
<PAGE> 1
<TABLE>
                                                     Exhibit 12

                                               PM HOLDINGS CORPORATION


(Dollars in Thousands)


                                           Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
<CAPTION>
                                            Predecessor Company                    Consolidated Holdings
                                      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Eight Months  Four Months
                                        Year Ended     Ended        Ended         Year Ended    Year Ended    Year Ended
                                       December 31,  August 31,   December 31,   December 31,  December 31,  December 31,
                                           1992        1993          1993           1994          1995          1996
                                      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                    <C>          <C>          <C>           <C>            <C>           <C>
Income (loss) from continuing
  operations before income taxes and
  cumulative effect of changes in
  accounting principles                $  28,430    $  24,766    $    8,697    $    4,678     $   (2,746)     $ (13,441)

Fixed Charges                             10,919        4,250        12,143        41,239         45,606         44,763
                                      ...................................................................................
Earnings                               $  39,349    $  29,016    $   20,840    $   45,917     $   42,860      $  31,322
                                      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges          3.60         6.83          1.72          1.11            .94            .70
                                      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

For the year ended December 31, 1996 earnings  are insufficient to cover
fixed charges by $13,441.



For purposes of computing these ratios and amounts, earnings consisted of
income from continuing operations before income taxes and fixed charges.
Fixed charges consist of interest expense on debt, amortization of financing
costs and the portion (approximately one-third) of rental expense that
management believes is representative of the interest component of rental
expense.


                                    106
----

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August 22, 2011  | By:    | /s/ John MacDonald             |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                                   |   | John MacDonald                 |
|                                   |   | Chief Financial Officer        |
|                                   |   | (Principal Accounting Officer) |
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20259 Conference Calendar

EDWARD ROY NEWSOME, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN JOSEPH SUTTER, Attorney, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CV-4556

-------------------- August 20, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Edward Roy Newsome, Texas state prisoner #437698, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In the complaint, Newsome alleged claims of legal malpractice and breach of contract against an attorney, John Joseph Sutter, retained by him to litigate a personal injury claim. Newsome does not challenge the district court’s determination that both he and Sutter were domiciled inNo. 02-20259 -2- the same state. Because Newsome has established neither diversity of citizenship nor a federal claim, the district court did not err in dismissing the suit for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332. Newsome’s motion entitled “Motion for Freedom of Information Act” is DENIED. AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF CLIFFORD C. WENDEHACK, DECEASED.

See same case below: 1 N. J. Super. 203; 63 A. 2nd 710.

*Mr. Ward J. Herbert*and *Messrs. McCarter, English & Studer*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. Gross, Blumberg, Mehlar & Goldberger*and *Mr. Leo Yanoff*for the respondents.

April 25, 1949.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                       QUARTERLY CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher Greenwood, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of San Jose
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c.   presented in this quarterly report the conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. As he registrant's certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on the most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6. As the registrant's certifying officer, I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of the most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
6th day of August 2003.

/s/ Christopher Greenwood
------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |             
|---------------------- |  | ------------
|NetManage Subsidiaries |  | Exhibit 21.1
|December 31, 2003      |  |             
|                       |  |             

|1. | Wall Data Incorporated
|-- | ----------------------

|2. | Wall Data International, Inc.
|-- | -----------------------------

|3. | FTP Software, Inc.
|-- | ------------------

|4. | Network Software Associates, Inc.
|-- | ---------------------------------

|5. | NetSoft, Inc.
|-- | -------------

|6. | N.Y. NetManage (Yerushalayim) Ltd.
|-- | ----------------------------------

|7. | NetManage, Ltd.
|-- | ---------------

|8. | NetManage Italia SRL
|-- | --------------------

|9. | NetManage Japan K.K.
|-- | --------------------

|10. | NetManage UK Limited
|--- | --------------------

|11. | NetManage Canada Inc.
|--- | ---------------------

|12. | NetManage Iberia, S.L.
|--- | ----------------------

|13. | NetManage SARL
|--- | --------------

|14. | Simware, Ltd.
|--- | -------------

|15. | Simware GmbH
|--- | ------------

|16. | NetSoft Benelux BVBA
|--- | --------------------

|17. | FTP Software GmbH
|--- | -----------------

|18. | FTP Software Limited
|--- | --------------------

|19. | Wall Data (UK), Ltd.
|--- | --------------------

|20. | Wall Data, Ltd.
|--- | ---------------

|21. | Expert Edge Computer Systems, Ltd.
|--- | ----------------------------------

|22. | Radisson, Ltd.
|--- | --------------

|23. | Wall Data Holding GmbH
|--- | ----------------------

|24. | NetManage Software GmbH
|--- | -----------------------

|25. | NetManage Mexico SA de CV
|--- | -------------------------

|26. | NetManage do Brasil Limitada
|--- | ----------------------------
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4794 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit unborn children 

to be account beneficiaries of section 529 education savings accounts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2018 

Mrs. NOEM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

unborn children to be account beneficiaries of section 

529 education savings accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Investing for Tomor5 row Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4794 IH

1 SEC. 2. UNBORN CHILDREN PERMITTED TO BE ACCOUNT 

2 BENEFICIARIES OF SECTION 529 EDUCATION 

3 SAVINGS ACCOUNTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 529(e) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(6) TREATMENT OF UNBORN CHILDREN.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Nothing shall prevent 

9 an unborn child from being treated as a des10 ignated beneficiary or an individual under this 

11 section. 

12 ‘‘(B) UNBORN CHILD.—For purposes of 

13 this paragraph— 

14 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘unborn 

15 child’ means a child in utero. 

16 ‘‘(ii) CHILD IN UTERO.—The term 

17 ‘child in utero’ means a member of the 

18 species homo sapiens, at any stage of de19 velopment, who is carried in the womb.’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 this section shall apply to contributions made after the 

22 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Health Equity and Cost AD/ADRD.                    

*Date:*                         March 5, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Carmen Moten, Ph.D., M.P.H.,  Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7703,                         *cmoten@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 28, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-28956 Filed 1-3-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 21



Subsidiaries of Bedford Property Investors, Inc.





|                                              |  |                      
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Subsidiary Name                               |  | State of Organization
|                                              |  |                      
|1.  Bedford Laguna Hills Square SPE, Inc.     |  | Arizona              
|2.  Bedford Petaluma SPE, Inc.                |  | Arizona              
|3.  Bedford Village Green SPE, Inc.           |  | Arizona              
|4.  Bedford Philips Business Center SPE, Inc. |  | Arizona              
|5.  Bedford Phoenix Tech Center SPE, Inc.     |  | Arizona              
|6.  Bedford Rio Salado SPE, Inc.              |  | Arizona              
|7.  Bedford Federal Way II LLC                |  | California           
|8.  Bedford Towne Centre Plaza LLC            |  | California           
|9.  Bedford Waterpark LLC                     |  | California           
|10.  Time Square Services, Inc.               |  | Maryland
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/27 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 27 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
#### C. R. ROSEMAN, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 7938.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 11, 1939.

H. G. Burnham, of Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner.

Samuel O. Clark, Jr., and Sewell Key, both of Washington, D. C, for respondent.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel; on consideration whereof, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals be and the same is affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Board filed May 26, 1937.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6000]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. MORAN:
       H.R. 6402.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       This legislation is authorized by Article 1, Section 8, 
     Clause 1, which grants Congress, authority regarding Defence 
     [sic] and general Welfare of the United States.
```
**EXHIBIT
      13.A**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Canadian Zinc Corporation
      for
      the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission, I, John F. Kearney, President and Chief Executive Officer of
      Canadian Zinc Corporation hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that





1.
            The
                annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the registrant.





Date:
      May
      28, 2007





*/s/
      John F. Kearney*


President
      and Chief Executive Officer
# Pulaski - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Lake Cumberland Area Development District, Inc. Executive Director Waylon Wright Email &#119;&#97;&#x79;&#x6c;&#111;&#110;&#x40;&#x6c;&#99;&#97;&#x64;&#x64;&#46;&#111;&#x72;&#x67;The post Lake Cumberland Area Development District, Inc. appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.