alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM

To : File

From : Mark Schuknecht Subject : RMA Meeting with Ac ting Director ORCR

Date : November 10, 2010

Rubber Manufacturers Associ ation (RMA) meeting with Suzanne Rudzinski Acting Director ORCR; Nov. 10, 2010.

Michael Blumenthal, representing RMA, made six points during the meeting:

1. Described the value of the RCC Scrap Tire Workgroup in fostering recycling and eliminating dangerous tire piles. He requested continued EPA support for the Workgroup. He explained the need fo r continued travel funding to enable States and Regions to meet annuall y. Highly supportive of Scrap Tire Workgroup.

2. Encouraged work on EPA website on Scrap Tires.

3. Encouraged EPA to assist and encourag e participation of tribal scrap tire

programs.

4. Inquired of EPA plans for the Border Project continued support and requested EPA plans.

5. Expressed concern for potential advers e impact of Definition of Solid Waste (Whole Tires) & 112/129 Rulemaking on TDF Market place.

6. Inquired as to whether ORCR wishes to continue working with the IRC on IMR activities. In this context, he mentioned two specific activities:

A. Does ORCR plan an RCC meeting in March as has been done in previous years? (Margaret responded that nothing is presently scheduled.)

B. FHWA has asked the IRC to arra nge a 2-day IMR workshop in Austin, TX, in November 2011. FHWA plans to f und travel for State DIT officials to attend the workshop. Michael asked wh ether ORCR would like to participate in the workshop in any way. He requested ORCR response by December.

7. Mentioned their concern about th e proposed rule regarding non-hazardous secondary materials as it impact scrap tires.No ORCR responses were provided at the meeting.

EPA asked clarifying questions regarding th e current management of scrap tires.

Attendees:

Micheal Blumenthal RMA Suzanne Rudzinski, EPA ORCR Margaret Guerriero, EPA ORCR Tab Tesnau, EPA, ORCR Truett Degeare, EPA, ORCR Kinbery Cochran, EPA ORCR Mark Schuknecht , EPA ORCR
EXHIBIT 32








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Li-ion Motors Corp. (the “Company”)  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),  I, Stacey Fling,  Chief  Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the  Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the Company.




December 15, 2011
/s/ Stacey FlingStacey FlingChief Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial Officer
#### HELEN SOBOL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHELSEA HOTEL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Argued September 27, 1948

Decided October 11, 1948.

*Mr. Max L. Rosenstein*argued the cause for the plaintiff-.appellant.

*Mr. Mamñce Y. Cole*argued the cause for the defendant-respondent *(Messrs. Cole & Cole,*attorneys).

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order of the former Supreme Court at the Atlantic County Circuit, opening *e,n*
      *14interlocutory judgment entered against the defendant by default, and permitting it to appear and defend upon terms.

An appeal, however, lies only from a final judgment. The order thus sought to be reviewed does not fall within the category of a final judgment and is, therefore, not appealable. *R. S.*2:27-349. *Vide Farmland Dairies v. Van Tol,*132 *N. J. L.*298, aff’d 133 *Id.*313; *Matthews v. Public Servive Interstate, etc., Co.,*130 *Id.*495; *Chavers v. McCall,*127 *Id.*595; *Kople v. Zalon,*122 *Id.*422; *Jacquin v. Appelgate,*128 *Id.*598; *Gaffney v. Illiwgsworth,*90 *Id.*490.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed, with costs.

*For dismissal of appeal:*Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, and Ackerson—7,

*Opposed:*None.
#### ADDIE LONG ROBINSON, COMPLAINANT-APPELLANT, v. WALTER F. HODGE, ADMINISTRATOR C. T. A. OF THE ESTATE OF AGNES GRACE WILLIAMS, DECEASED, AND INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Argued January 17, 1949

Decided February 7, 1949.

*Mr. Robert S. Hartgrove*argued the cause for complainant-appellant.

*Mr. Edward J. Madden*argued the cause for defendants-respondents *(Mr. Louis E. Saunders,*attorney).

Per Curiam.

The appeal is from an order of the Court of Chancery allowing respondents a counsel fee of $500. for serv*358ices rendered in the Court of Errors and Appeals on an appeal from a decree in Chancery which terminated in favor of respondent. The order recites that “through mere inadvertence” the application was not addressed to the Court of Errors and Appeals.

The case is not of the class in which counsel fees are allowable for services rendered on the appeal to the Court of Errors and Appeals. The object of the bill was to have a judgment recovered by complainant imposed as a lien upon lands of the decedent, Agnes Grace Williams, and a receiver appointed to collect rents. The bill was dismissed. The litigation did not concern a fund in court. *Nobile v. Bartletta, 112 N.*J. *Eq.*304*(E. & A. 1932).*

The order is reversed.

*For reversal:*'Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Heher, Waci-ieneeld, Burling and Ackerson—6.

*For affirmance:*None.
#### ALEXANDER v. STATE.

No. A-11834.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Feb. 11, 1953.

Amos T. Hall, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., and Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

POWELL, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiff in error, George Alexander, was charged in the district court of Pawnee County with the crime of “Shooting at another person with intent to kill such another person.” The information charged that a .12 gauge shot gun was used and that the charge struck one Robert Thompson in the body, face and head, all in violation of Section 652 of Title 21 O.S.A.1941. The jury returned a verdict of guilty, but left the punishment to be fixed by the trial court. This was on February 18, 1952. On February 19., 1952, the court entered judgment in accordance with the verdict, but fixing the punishment at confinement of three .years in the State Penitentiary. The court could, of course, have assessed a maximum sentence of ten years in the penitentiary, as provided by the statute above referred to. The court on the same day overruled a motion for new trial interposed by counsel for the defendant.

Under provision of Section 1054 of Title 22. O.S.1951, the charge being a felony, *853the person charged and found' guilty was, in order to have the appeal considered by this court, required to perfect his appeal within a period of six months from the date of entry of judgment. The six months expired on August 19, 1952. The case-, made and petition in error were not filed in this court until August 22, 1952. No brief has ever been filed. The Attorney General has called these facts to the attention of this court by way of motion to dismiss appeal.

The record having been carefully examined by this court, and it affirmatively disclosing that the attempted appeal was not perfected within six months from the date of the entry of the judgment complained of, this court has no jurisdiction to consider the appeal. The statutory provisions are mandatory. We have no discretion in the matter. McAdams v. State. 17 Okl.Cr. 740, 192 P. 428; Fleetwood v. State, 16 Okl.Cr. 675, 181 P. 157; Elam v. State, 70 Okl.Cr. 194, 105 P.2d 432; Johnson v. State, 70 Okl.Cr. 322, 106 P.2d 128; Higgins v. State, 61 Okl.Cr. 39, 65 P.2d 546.

It is, therefore, ordered that the purported appeal be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with directions to cause its judgment and sentence to be carried into execution.

JONES and BRETT, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.23


EXPERT CONSENT
 I, Charles Dearin, do hereby consent to (i) the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report Messina Minerals Inc.: Tulks South Property, Central Newfoundland,Canada" dated August 2007 and other technical information pertaining to the Tulks South Property in the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) for the year ended December 31, 2013 of Canadian Zinc Corporation (the “Company”) and (ii) the use of my name in the AIF and the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto incorporating by reference the Company’s AIF.
 Dated this 20thday of March, 2014.
 /s/ Charles Dearin
 Name: Charles Dearin
H. R. 4646 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1900 Corporate 

Drive in Birmingham, Alabama, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Thomas E. Rivers, Jr. 

Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL THOMAS E. RIVERS, JR. POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1900 Corporate Drive in Birmingham, Alabama, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Thomas 

E. Rivers, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Lance Corporal Thomas E. Rivers, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Advisory Council, January 10, 2024, 08:30 a.m. to January 11, 2024, 04:30 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center Drive, C Wing 6th Floor Conf. Room F&G, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 19, 2023, 88 FR 64448.                

This meeting is being amended to reflect the change in time on the second day of the meeting, January 11, 2024 from 04:30 p.m. to 12:00 p.m., and to add the conference room to the meeting location Building 31, 6th Floor Conference Room F&G. The meeting is partially closed to the public.

      ( print page 88933)    
Dated: December 20, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-28389 Filed 12-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Huntington Preferred Capital,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael J. McMennamin, President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.




                                           /s/ Michael J. McMennamin
                                           -------------------------------------
                                               Michael J. McMennamin, President
                                               (chief executive officer)
                                               November 13, 2003


        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

     <ARTICLE>                         7
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Earnings at December 31, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                    0000910110
<NAME>                                   Penn-America Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                             1000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 Dec-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         105,598
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        26,956
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                          0
<EQUITIES>                                   25,238
<MORTGAGE>                                   0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               158,789
<CASH>                                       24,077
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           18,766
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       8,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               230,504
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              88,937
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          34,253
<POLICY-OTHER>                               0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     99
<OTHER-SE>                                   100,531
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 230,504
<PREMIUMS>                                   89,493
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          10,783
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           18
<OTHER-INCOME>                               0
<BENEFITS>                                   55,733
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  25,452
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         6,389
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              12,523
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,642
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,881
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.90
<RESERVE-OPEN>                               0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                          0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                            0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                           0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                              0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                      0
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOHNNIE ELIJAH and EDNA ELIJAH , Appellant s ,

v.

ADAMS TRANSPORT, INC.
, Appellee

.

No

. 4D2 2

- 945

[ August 17, 2023 ]

Appeal from the C ircuit Court for the Seven teent h Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Keathan B. Frink

, Judge ; L.T. Case No. CACE20007326

.

Brian J. Lee of Morgan & Morgan, Jacksonville

, for appellant s

.

Steven Mitchel, Marie Baez Lorenzo, William Xanttopoulos, and Lianet Rodriguez Quindemil of Mintzer, Sarowitz, Zeris, Ledva & Meyers, LLP, Miami, for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

K LINGENSMITH
, C.J., G ROSS and C IKLIN
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
L/f-'L'7 <A/·~ rli£________ 

:t e ,\ Cr !A\\ EER t)F C O /v\M ERCr 

January 5, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany, Chief 

Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

The Manistee Area Chamber of Commerce vigorously supports the application of Manistee Blacker 

Airport Authority for participation in the Alternate Essential Air Service Pilot Program. 

The Manistee Area Chamber of Commerce represents nearly 500 businesses in and around Manistee 

County and exists to advance and support the interests of those businesses and the thousands of 

individuals they collectively employ. Commercial air service at Manistee County Blacker Airport 

provides area businesses a vital link to the national transportation system and that link is critical for the 

area's present and future economic development. 

Manistee's business community is diverse, including manufacturing, healthcare and tourism as leading 

industries. These industries depend on reliable, affordable air transportation with the type of aircraft 

that people will use. The Manistee County Blacker Airport has seen tremendous growth during the past 

year. We view that growth as evidence that the Manistee business community requires viable air 

transportation to support its continued economic development. The Chamber is confident that the 

decision of the Manistee Blacker Airport Authority to pursue air service to Chicago with a 30 seat 

commuter aircraft best meets the needs of area businesses. 

We view the proposed participation in the Alternate Essential Air Service Pilot Program as an 

appropriate use of federal funding in an effort to facilitate air transportation in the Manistee area and 

also believe this will improve the standard Essential Air Service program. We urge your thoughtful 

consideration and approval of the Alternate Essential Air Service proposal put forth by the Manistee 

Blacker Airport Authority. 

;;;~?~OJ Melissa Reed 

Executive Director 

II Cypress Street 

Manistee, MI 4966o 

Phone 231·723·2575 Fax 231723-1515 

www.manisteechamber.com
Order entered August 8, 2017 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00734-CV 

IN RE CHARLES DOUGLAS MITCHELL, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 330th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-25173 

ORDER 

Before Justices Francis, Brown, and Whitehill 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we CONDITIONALLY GRANT the petition 

for writ of mandamus. We ORDER the trial court to make written rulings within fifteen (15) 

days of the date of this opinion vacating the April 12, 2017 new trial order and vacating the 

associate judge’s May 31, 2017 interim orders. We further ORDER the trial court to file with 

this Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, a certified copy of its order(s) issued 

in compliance with this order and with the Court’s opinion of this date. Should the trial court fail 

to comply with this order, the writ will issue. 

We LIFT this Court’s July 11, 2017 stay to the extent that the trial court may issue the 

order(s) necessary to comply with this order and with the Court’s opinion of this date. 
We ORDER the real party in interest Lauren Patrice Hixson to bear the costs, if any, of 

this original proceeding. 

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL 

 JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 119 (Tuesday, August 7, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5720]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              ADJOURNMENT

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Without objection, pursuant to Senate 
Concurrent Resolution 59, 112th Congress, the House stands adjourned 
until 2 p.m. on Monday, September 10, 2012.
  There was no objection.
  Accordingly (at 10 o'clock and 5 minutes a.m.), the House adjourned 
until Monday, September 10, 2012, at 2 p.m.

                          ____________________
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

9:30 a.m. on Friday, January 5, 2024.

# PLACE:

The meeting was held via video conference on the internet.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

The Special Review Committee of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met to consider matters related to the Corporation's corporate activities within its authority to act on behalf of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. In calling the meeting, the Special Review Committee determined, by the unanimous vote of Director Jonathan P. McKernan and Director Michael J. Hsu (Acting Comptroller of the Currency), that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters which were to be the subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2) and (c)(4) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (c)(4)).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be directed to Debra A. Decker, Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.

Dated: January 5, 2024.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

James P. Sheesley,

Assistant Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-00333 Filed 1-5-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P