alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Support Documents for 

Significant New Use Rule (SNURs) on 

Premanufacture Notices (PMNs) 

P-03-529, P-03-530, and P-03-531

EPA Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0577 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 30
Index

A-001 Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report for 

PMNs P-03-529, P-03-530, and P-03-531 

A-002 Initial Review Engineering Report for 

PMNs P-03-529, P-03-530, and P-03-531 

A-003 Initial Review Exposure Report for 

PMNs P-03-529, P-03-530, and P-03-531 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 30
A-001 

Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report

for PMNs P-03-529, P-03-530, and P-03-531 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 30
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 30
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 30
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 30
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 30
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 30
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 30
A-002 

Initial Review Engineering Report

for PMNs P-03-529, P-03-530, and P-03-531 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 30
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 30
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 30
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 30
EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 30
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 30
EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 30
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 30
A-003 

Initial Review Exposure Report

for PMNs P-03-529, P-03-530, and P-03-531 

EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 30
EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 30
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 20 of 30
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 21 of 30
EPA SANITIZED Page 22 of 30
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 23 of 30
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 24 of 30
 EPA SANITIZED Page 25 of 30
EPA SANITIZED Page 26 of 30
EPA SANITIZED Page 27 of 30
EPA SANITIZED Page 28 of 30
EPA SANITIZED Page 29 of 30
EPA SANITIZED Page 30 of 30
Note between Deseado and Fellows Energy



 Exhibit 10.16 
  
 NOTE 
  
 September 24, 2004 
  
         Fellows Energy Ltd. promises to pay $625,000 plus interest at 8% to the order of Deseado, LLC on demand. 
  
 /s/ George S. Young 
  
 George S. Young 
 Chief Executive Officer 
 Fellows Energy, Ltd.
## SERVED: December 20, 2012

InThe Matter Of: ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2011-1005 COASTAL AIR ) TRANSPORT, INC. 

### ) ) Case No. 2010-S0-700037 Respondent )


### NOTICE OF HEARING LOCATION On July 31, 2012, an Order Setting Litigation Dates and

### Pro~edures was flied, which notedthat the location ofthe Hearing wouldbe provided by separateNotice to the parties. PLEASE TAKENOTICE that the Hearing in this case, set to begin onJanuary 29,2013, at 9:30 a.m., will be held at the following location: U.S. District Court, District ofthe Virgin Islands Almeric 

### L. Christian Federal Building and Courthouse 3013 Estate GoldenRock, Suite 219 3rd Floor, Courtroom# 2 Christiansted, St. Croix, VI 00820 The courthouse opens to the public at 8:00a.m. Atlantic Standard Time (AST). The Hearing begins at 9:30a.m. AST. Please allowtime to pass through security. Cameras, including

. . cellulartelephones incorporating cameras, are not allowed in federal courthouses.

Attachment

- Service List

### FDMS No. FAA-2011-1005 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL and FAX ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite2W10001



### Ms,. Rashawn Rich George, Esq. 

### Complainant,s Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 Southern Region Federal Aviati9nAdministration P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta GA 30320 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 Mr. Michael Foster, President 

### Respondent Coastal AirTransport, Inc. P.O. Box 3985 Christiansted, St. Croix, VI 00822 TEL & 

### FAX: 340-773-6862 The Honorable J.E. Sullivan U. S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 

### ONE COPY

1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 · TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright**Building~Suite** 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. G. M. POTEET, Guardian of Parker M. Graham.

No. 11580.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Sept. 5, 1939.

Clinton R. Barry, U. S. Atty., and John E. Harris, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Fort Smith, Ark.

Roy Gean, of Fort Smith, Ark., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal docketed and dismissed without costs to either party in this court, on motion of appellant and consent of appellee.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 21.1
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF BELDEN INC.


Belden Inc.                                 (Incorporated in Delaware)

Belden Wire & Cable Company                 (Incorporated in Delaware)

Belden Technologies, Inc.                   (Incorporated in Delaware)

Belden International, Inc.                  (Incorporated in Delaware)

Belden Holdings, Inc.                       (Incorporated in Delaware)

Cable Systems Holding Company               (Incorporated in Delaware)

Belden Communications Company               (Incorporated in Delaware)

Belden Communications Holding, Inc.         (Incorporated in Delaware)

Belden Europe B.V.                          (Incorporated in The Netherlands)

Belden Wire & Cable B.V.                    (Incorporated in The Netherlands)

Belden International Holdings B.V.          (Incorporated in The Netherlands)

Belden Europe B.V. & Belden Wire &          (German Civil Code Partnership)
Cable B.V. Finance GbR

Belden Deutschland GmbH                     (Incorporated in Germany)

Belden Electronics GmbH                     (Incorporated in Germany)

Belden-EIW GmbH & Co. KG                    (German Limited Partnership)

Belden Pacific Finance Pty Ltd.             (Incorporated in Australia)

Belden Pacific Finance Unit Trust           (Organized in Australia)

Belden Australia Pty Ltd.                   (Incorporated in Australia)

Belden Superannuation Pty. Ltd.             (Incorporated in Australia)

Belden Foreign Sales Corporation            (Incorporated in Barbados)

Belden-Duna Kabel Kft.                      (Incorporated in Hungary)


<PAGE>   2

Belden Electronics Argentina S.A.           (Incorporated in Argentina)

Belden (Canada) Inc.                        (Incorporated in Canada)

Belden Electronics S.a.r.l.                 (Incorporated in France)

Belden (UK) Finco Limited Partnership       (United Kingdom Limited Partnership)

Belden UK Limited                           (Incorporated in the United Kingdom)

Belden Electronics, S.A. de C.V.            (Incorporated in Mexico)

Belden Brasil Comercial Ltda.               (Incorporated in Brazil)
# PMN Substance in Paint/Waxes/Cleaner Formulation Pr oduction

55 gallon container of 28 wt% PMN substance. Pump PMN substance into

10,000 gallon paint/wax/cleaner mixer

1, 5 or 55 gallon paint/wax/ cleaner containers with up to 0.2% PMN substance (up to 0.02% for wax/cleaner). 10,000 gallon paint/wax/cleaner mixer to mix cleaner components and PMN substance Release Point 1 – from

clean-out of PMN substance container (0.08 kg/batch if not recycled).

Release Point 2 – from cleanout of cleaner mixer (0.08 kg/batch). Clean-out between batches not routine.

Up to 80 kg of PMN substance per batch of cleaner (up to 8 kg for wax/cleaner) Worker Activity A – Addition of PMN substance to 10,000 gallon mixing tank

Worker Activity B – Clean-out of PMN substance container.

Worker Activity C – Clean-out of mixing tank
Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

A college completion rate is the percentage of persons ages 25 

and over with a bachelor’s degree or more. The percent of the 

U.S. average is computed by dividing the county college 

completion rate by the national average and multiplying by 100. 

The map uses critical breaks such as the national average to 

organize the data into groups of common values.

Map Created: July 2018

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2012–2016

0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

17.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.9%

100.0% - 170.2%

Percent of the U.S. Average

(Critical Breaks Classification)

U.S. average = 30.3%

Appalachian average = 23.2%
#### Glenn Jakalow, Respondent, v Josephine Consoli et al., Appellants.

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Stolarik, J.), dated September 21, 1989, which, after a jury trial, granted the plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict as to damages for pain and suffering only, which was in the principal sum of $12,000, to the extent of granting a new trial on the issue of damages for pain and suffering unless the defendants consented to increase the verdict as to damages for pain and suffering to the principal sum of $100,000.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the facts and as an exercise of discretion, by deleting therefrom the sum of "$100,000” and by substituting therefor the sum of "$50,000”; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that in the event they determine to do so, the defendants’ consent to an increase in damages for pain and suffering from $12,000 to $50,000, shall be in the form of a written stipulation to be served and filed in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Rockland County; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendants’ time to serve and file said stipulation is extended until 30 days after service upon them of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the jury’s award to the plaintiff of $12,000 for pain and suffering deviated materially from what would be reasonable compensation for the plaintiff’s injuries which included, *inter alia,*fractures of the foot and ankle, and which required two surgical procedures *(see,*CPLR 5501 [c]; *Cadaner v Eretz Assn.,*155 AD2d 409). However, we are of the view that an increase in these damages from $12,000 to $50,000, is sufficient to properly compen*827sate the plaintiff. Accordingly, the order has been modified to the extent indicated.

We note that the order appealed from provides that should the defendants fail to consent to an increase in damages, a new trial will be granted to the plaintiff on that issue. Mengano, P. J., Kooper, Rosenblatt and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P. AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          88,830
<SECURITIES>                                   261,961
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               350,791
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 350,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,834
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     343,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   350,791
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,510
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,695
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             40,695
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    40,695
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   211.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   211.67
        

</TABLE>
Rel: May 17, 2024

STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

THE SUPREME COURT OCTOBER TERM, 2023-2024

SC-2023-0437 Leah Abbott Belser v. Elmore County and City of Prattville (Appeal from Elmore Circuit Court: CV-22-900202). SHAW, Justice. AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R. App. P. Parker, C.J., and Bryan, Mendheim, and Mitchell, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely forthe purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned ChiefExecutive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies (the “Company”), herebycertifies, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (AmendmentNo. 1) of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ Ricardo A. Salas                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Ricardo A. Salas, Chief Executive Officer |
| July 20, 2006                             |

 

----
#### Rose Nadel, *et al., Appellants,*v. A. Schoeneman and H. Schoeneman, Partners as J. Schoeneman, *Appellees.*

Opinion Filed Oct. 26, 1915.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lee County; F. A. Whitney, Judge.

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from herein is reversed on the authority of the case of Rose Nadel *et al.,*Appellants, v. Weber Brothers Shoe Company, a corporation, Appellee, this day disposed of.
#### John Puntoriero et al., Respondents, v Daniel Vec*677chio et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 1.)

— Motion for reargument granted and upon reargument, order and memorandum decision of December 21, 1990 [168 AD2d 966] are hereby amended to provide that the order appealed from is unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, and the memorandum decision is further amended by adding the following paragraph: "Insofar as Supreme Court denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment, that part of the order is affirmed.” Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 5

- 0 0 3 93

- C R

Style: Christopher Ernest Braughton v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : August 17 , 201 5

Type of motion: M otion t o S ubstitut e C ounsel

Part y filing motion: Appell ant ’ s new counsel Niles Illich

Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No

.

Ordered that motion i s:

 Granted

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

The motion to substitute counsel is granted , but construed as a notice of appearance

as lead counsel

, and t he Clerk of this Court is directed to note Niles Illich as lead

counsel for appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 6. 1 (a) , 6.2 , 6.5(d)

. If counsel Robert

Sirianni requests withdrawal, he must file a motion that complies with Rule 6.5 (d)

. Mr. Sirianni’s objection is overruled as moot.

Judge ’ s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually

Date: August 27, 2015
|Exhibit 13.1
|------------



|Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 
      (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
      States Code)
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Pursuant to section 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
      chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers
      of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A. d e C.V. (the Company), does hereby
      certify, to such officers knowledge, that:
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|The Annual Report on form 20-F
      for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Form 20-F) of the
      Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form
      20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: April 5, 2004 | /s/ Carlos Salazar Lomelín
      Carlos Salazar Lomelín 
      Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: April 5, 2004 | /s/ Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez
      Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez 
      Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|A signed original of this written statement required by section
      906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





---
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Donald R. Kimble, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Huntington PreferredCapital, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize, and report financial information; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: May 13, 2005                                                                   /s/ Donald R. Kimble        Donald R. Kimble, President        (chief executive officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           9,549
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,688
<ALLOWANCES>                                       424
<INVENTORY>                                     42,581
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,869
<PP&E>                                         292,919
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 324,862
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,541
<BONDS>                                        142,676
<COMMON>                                           122
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,610
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   324,862
<SALES>                                        332,888
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               332,888
<CGS>                                          234,271
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  299,472
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,506
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,371
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,638
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,733
<DISCONTINUED>                                     143
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,876
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>