### 48686 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

14 77 FR at 46,264. fraud prevention technologies, card reissuance due to fraudulent activity, data security, and card activation. 14

As noted above, section 920(a)(4)(B) specifically directs the Board to consider in establishing the interchange fee standard the costs ‘‘incurred by the issuer for the role of the issuer in the authorization, clearance or settlement of a particular transaction.’’ Transactions monitoring is an integral part of the authorization process, so that the costs incurred in that process are part of the authorization costs that the Board is required by the statute to consider when establishing the interchange fee standard. In addition, the statutory language of section 920(a)(5), which differs in important respects from section 920(a)(4)(B), supports the Board’s decision to include transactions-monitoring costs in the interchange fee standard rather than in the separate fraud prevention adjustment. The costs considered in section 920(a)(5)(A)(i) are those of preventing fraud ‘‘in relation to electronic debit transactions,’’ rather than costs of ‘‘a particular electronic debit transaction’’ referenced in section 920(a)(4)(B). Congress’s elimination of the word ‘‘particular’’ and its use of the more general phrase ‘‘in relation to,’’ along with its use of the plural‘‘transactions,’’ indicates that the fraudprevention adjustment may take into account an issuer’s fraud prevention costs over a broad spectrum of transactions that are not linked to a particular transaction.

Moreover, section 920(a)(5) permits the Board to adopt a separate adjustment ‘‘to make allowance for costs incurred by the issuer in preventing fraud in relation to electronic debit transactions involving that issuer’’ if certain standards are met, and directs that those standards include that the issuers take steps to ‘‘reduce the occurrence of, and costs from, fraud in relation to electronic debit transactions,’’ including ‘‘development and implementation of cost-effective fraud prevention technology.’’ Section 920(a)(5)(A)(i), (A)(ii)(II) (emphasis supplied). The use of the general phrase ‘‘fraud in relation to electronic debit transactions’’ and the specific reference to developing fraud prevention technology suggest a Congressional intent to use the fraud prevention adjustment to encourage issuers to develop and adopt programmatic improvements to address fraud outside of the context of particular transactions that incur costs for authorization, clearance, or settlement. The types of costs the Board included in the separate fraud prevention adjustment are programmatic costs, such as researching and developing new fraud prevention technologies and data security, and other costs that encourage enhanced fraud prevention that are not necessary to effect particular transactions.

The Board is publishing this explanation in accordance with the opinion of the Court of Appeals.

By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 10, 2015. Robert deV. Frierson, Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015–19979 Filed 8–13–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 1**

**Definitions and Abbreviations**

CFR Correction

In Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1 to 59, revised as of January 1, 2015, on pages 12 and 13, in § 1.1, the definitions beginning with V A and ending with V S are removed.

[FR Doc. 2015–20045 Filed 8–13–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 1505–01–D**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**

**[Docket No. FAA–2015–3325; Airspace Docket No. 15–AWP–15]** 

**Amendment of Class D and E Airspace; Santa Rosa, CA** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Final rule, technical amendment.

**SUMMARY :**  This action amends Class D airspace and Class E airspace designated as an extension at Santa Rosa, CA, by updating the geographic coordinates of Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County Airport to coincide with the FAAs database. This action does not involve a change in the dimensions or operating requirements of the airspace.

**DATES :**  Effective 0901 UTC, October 15, 2015. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

**ADDRESSES :**  FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/ airtraffic/publications/. The Order is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741–6030, or go to http://www.archives.gov/ federal

_register/code

_ of

_federalregulations/ibr

_locations.html. FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is published yearly and effective on September 15. For further information, you can contact the Airspace Policy and ATC Regulations Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington DC 29591; Telephone: (202) 267–8783.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Rob Riedl, Federal Aviation Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA, 98057; Telephone (425)
203–4534.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Authority for this Rulemaking

The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority as it amends Class D and Class E airspace at Santa Rosa, CA.
History

The FAAs Aeronautical Information Services identified that the airport reference point (ARP) was not coincidental with the FAA’s aeronautical database. This action makes these corrections. Accordingly, since this action merely adjusts the geographic coordinates of the airport, notice and public procedure under 553(b) are unnecessary.

Class D and E airspace designations are published in paragraphs 5000 and 6004, respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9Y, dated August 6, 2014, and


### 48687 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

effective September 15, 2014, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. The Class D and Class E airspace designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order. Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

This document amends FAA Order 7400.9Y, airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2014, and effective September 15, 2014. FAA Order 7400.9Y is publicly available as listed in the **ADDRESSES** section of this final rule. FAA Order 7400.9Y lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and reporting points.

The Rule

This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 amends Class D airspace and Class E airspace designated as an extension at Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County Airport, Santa Rosa, CA. The airport’s geographic coordinates are adjusted to be in concert with the FAA’s aeronautical database. This is an administrative change and does not affect the dimensions or operating requirements of the airspace area. Regulatory Notices and Analyses

The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is non-controversial, and unlikely to result in adverse or negative comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’ paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an environmental assessment. Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air). Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

**PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR**  **TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS** 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.

**§ 71.1 [Amended]**

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2014, effective September 15, 2014, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace
* * * * *

AWP CA D Santa Rosa, CA [Amended]

Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County Airport, CA (lat. 38 ° 30 ′ 35 ′′ N., long. 122 ° 48 ′ 46 ′′ W.).

That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including 2,600 feet MSL within a 4.3-mile radius of Santa Rosa/ Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County Airport. This Class D airspace area is effective during the specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in the Airport/Facility Directory.
Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to Class D or Class E Surface Area
* * * * *

AWP CA E4 Santa Rosa, CA [Amended]

Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County Airport, CA (lat. 38 ° 30 ′ 35 ′′ N., long. 122 ° 48 ′ 46 ′′ W.).

That airspace extending upward from the surface within 2 miles either side of the 342 ° bearing from the Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County Airport, CA, extending from the 4.3- mile radius of the airport to 14 miles northwest of the airport.

Issued in Seattle, Washington, on August 5,
2015. Christopher Ramirez, Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2015–19952 Filed 8–13–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF STATE** 

**22 CFR Part 62**

**[Public Notice: 9215]**

**Exchange Visitor Program—Waiver of Certain Program Eligibility**  **Requirements**

**AGENCY :**  Department of State.

**ACTION :**  Change of program duration for current YES program students from Yemen.

**SUMMARY :**  In accordance with the General Provisions of the Exchange Visitor Program regulations, the Department’s Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs has waived certain program eligibility requirements with respect to an educational and cultural exchange program established pursuant to an arrangement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Yemen.

**DATES :**  Effective August 14, 2015.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Mara Tekach, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional Exchanges, U.S. Department of State, SA–5, Floor 5, 2200 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20522; or email at JExchanges@ state.gov

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The Department of State (the Department) administers the Exchange Visitor Program pursuant to the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2451, et.
seq. ), also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act (the Act). The purpose of the Act is to increase mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the people of other countries, including through educational and cultural exchanges. The Department’s implementing regulations for the Exchange Visitor Program are set forth at 22 CFR part 62.

In accordance with 22 CFR 62.1(c), the Department’s Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs has waived 22 CFR 62.25(c) with respect to an educational and cultural exchange program established pursuant to an arrangement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Yemen. The program, which begins in August 2015, is for approximately thirty students from the Republic of Yemen currently in the United States on the Kennedy-Lugar Youth Exchange & Study Program (YES). This waiver of 22 CFR 62.25(c), which imposes a one-year maximum program duration for secondary school participants, will