Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 112 / Wednesday, June 11, 2014 / Proposed Rules 33491 

1 79 FR 25038. One of the petitions was filed by 

SoundExchange, Inc. The other, which was styled 

as a motion for clarification, was filed by College 

Broadcasters, Inc., American Council on Education 

and Intercollegiate Broadcasting Systems, Inc. 

(‘‘Petitioners’’). As discussed in the Federal 

Register notice seeking comments on the proposals, 

the Judges view the Petitioners’ proposal as seeking 

a substantive change in the regulations, and 

therefore treat the motion as a petition for 

rulemaking. 

have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is 

available free at the site. 

You may also access documents of the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register by using the article search 

feature at: www.federalregister.gov. 

Specifically, through the advanced 

search feature at this site, you can limit 

your search to documents published by 

the Department. 

Dated: June 6, 2014. 

Michael K. Yudin, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services. 

[FR Doc. 2014–13648 Filed 6–10–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 

Copyright Royalty Board 

37 CFR Part 370 

[Docket No. 14–CRB–0005 (RM)] 

Notice and Recordkeeping for Use of 

Sound Recordings Under Statutory 

License 

AGENCY: Copyright Royalty Board, 

Library of Congress. 

ACTION: Extension of Comment Period. 

SUMMARY: The Copyright Royalty Judges 

are extending the period for filing 

comments on Notice and Recordkeeping 

for Use of Sound Recordings Under 

Statutory License. 

DATES: The comment period on the 

proposed rulemaking on Notice and 

Recordkeeping for Use of Sound 

Recordings Under Statutory License is 

extended to June 30. 

ADDRESSES: The Copyright Royalty 

Board (CRB) prefers that comments and 

reply comments be submitted 

electronically to crb@loc.gov. In the 

alternative, commenters shall send a 

hard-copy original, five paper copies, 

and an electronic copy on a CD either 

by U.S. mail or hand delivery. The CRB 

will not accept multiple submissions 

from any commenter. Electronic 

documents must be in either PDF format 

containing accessible text (not an 

image); Microsoft Word; WordPerfect; 

Rich Text Format (RTF); or ASCII text 

file format (not a scanned document). 

Commenters MAY NOT submit 

comments and reply comments by an 

overnight delivery service other than the 

U.S. Postal Service Express Mail. If 

commenters choose to use the U.S. 

Postal Service (including overnight 

delivery), they must address their 

comments and reply comments to: 

Copyright Royalty Board, P.O. Box 

70977, Washington, DC 20024–0977. If 

commenters choose hand delivery by a 

private party, they must direct their 

comments and reply comments to the 

Copyright Office Public Information 

Office, Library of Congress, James 

Madison Memorial Building, Room LM– 

401, 101 Independence Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20559–6000. If 

commenters choose delivery by 

commercial courier, they must direct 

their comments and reply comments to 

the Congressional Courier Acceptance 

Site located at 2nd and D Street NW., 

Washington, DC, on a normal business 

day between 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. The 

envelope must be addressed to: 

Copyright Royalty Board, Library of 

Congress, James Madison Memorial 

Building, LM–401, 101 Independence 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20559– 

6000. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

LaKeshia Keys (202) 707–7658 or email 

at crb@loc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 2, 2014, the Copyright 

Royalty Judges (‘‘Judges’’) published a 

notice of proposed rulemaking 

(‘‘NPRM’’) seeking comment on two 

petitions for rulemaking.1 Comments 

were due by June 2, 2014. Reply 

comments were due by June 16, 2014. 

On May 20, 2014, the National 

Association of Broadcasters (‘‘NAB’’) 

filed a motion with the Judges seeking 

a 21-day extension of the comment 

deadline. To support its request, NAB 

argues, among other things, that 

SoundExchange’s petition is detailed 

and preparing a meaningful response 

will require extensive fact-finding. NAB 

also opines that there is no urgency in 

addressing SoundExchange’s petition 

since the current regulations have been 

in place for years. Motion at 2. 

In the interests of providing an ample 

opportunity for all interested parties to 

prepare a meaningful response to the 

petitions, the Judges hereby extend the 

deadline for comments on the petitions 

to June 30, 2014. Reply comments, if 

any, should be filed no later than 

August 11, 2014. 

Dated: May 22, 2014. 

David R. Strickler, 

Copyright Royalty Judge. 

Approved by: 

James H. Billington, 

Librarian of Congress. 

[FR Doc. 2014–13646 Filed 6–10–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1410–72–P 


wreier-aviles on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES