alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MDE 

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 

1800 Washington Boulevard • Baltimore MD 21230 

410-537-3000. 1-800-633-6101 

Martin O'Malley 

Governor 

Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. 

Anthony G. Brown 

Lieutenant Governor 

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA Region 3 

1650 Arch Street, 16th Floor, 3RAOO 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

Secretary 

II 2 2D1Z 

The Maryland Department of the Environment (MOE) is formally submitting the attached state 

implementation plan (SIP), Baltimore Serious Nonattainment Area 0.08 ppm 8-Hour Ozone 

State Implementation Plan Demonstrating Rate of Progress for 2008, 201 1 and ·201 2 Revision to 2002 

Base Year Emissions; and Serious Area Attainment Demonstration SIP Number: 13-07. 

The plan has been prepared by the Maryland Department of the Environment Air and Radiation 

Management Administration to comply with the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA) and with 

EPA requirements for the Baltimore region as stated in EPA's reclassification of the Baltimore region 

(77 Fed. Reg. 4901 , February 1, 20 12). 

The MDE certifies that identical electronic and hard copies of this SIP are enclosed. The MOE is also 

providing documentation showing that a thirty-day comment period was offered on this Clean Air Act 

11 O(a)(2) submittal. A public hearing for this SIP was held in Baltimore, Maryland on July 19, 2013. 

All required administrative procedures were properly followed throughout the hearing process. 

If I may be of further assistance, please contact me or Mr. George (Tad) S. Abum, Jr., Director of the 

Air and Radiation Management Administration, at 410-53 7-3255, or by email at gabum@mde.state.md.us. 

Sincerely, 

1!:/fts!j "" -------

Secretary 

Enclosure 

cc: Diana Esher, Director, Air Protection Division, USEPA Region III 

~ Recycled Paper 

George (Tad) Abum, Jr., Director, Air and Radiation Management Administration 

Diane Franks, Program Manager, Air Quality Planning 

www .mde.state.md.us TIY Usm 1-800-735-2258 

Vi.a Maryland Relay Ser-..Jce
# C_2008260EN.01001801.xml

| 11.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/18

---

Action brought on 25 August 2008 — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM (Representation of a small bell with a red ribbon)

(Case T-346/08)

(2008/C 260/33)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG (Kilchberg, Switzerland) (represented by: R. Lange, E. Schalast and G. Hild, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 June 2008 (Appeal Case R 943/2007-4); and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 June 2008 (Appeal Case R 943/2007-4); and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: A three-dimensional mark, representing a small bell with a red ribbon, for goods in Class 30 (Application No 4 770 831).

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Breach of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), as the mark applied for has the necessary distinctive character and its availability does not have to be preserved.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
Exhibit 23.1

                         Independent Auditors' Consent



The Stockholders and Board of Directors
Bogen Communications International, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-21245) on Form S-8 of Bogen Communications International, Inc. of our report
dated March 8, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Bogen
Communications International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and
1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period
ended December 31, 1998 and related financial statement schedules for 1998 and 
1997,which report appears in the December 31, 1998, annual report on Form 10-K
of Bogen Communications International, Inc. Our report refers to a report of
other auditors.

                                    KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey 
March 31, 1999
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00759

- CV

Cathy Brigham, Appellant

v.

Akbar Amin

- Akbari, and 11907 Rennalee Loop, Austin, Texas 78753, Appellee s

FROM THE 419TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- GN

- 17

- 006376 , THE H O NORABLE JAMES LEE CA RROLL, JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Cathy Brigham has filed an uno p posed moti on to dismiss this appeal.

We g rant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)

.

__ _______ _

_

_______________________________ Jeff R ose, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Triana and Smith

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: November 22, 2019
# Clay - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Golden Triangle Planning and Development District Executive Director Rupert L. Johnson Email rj&#111;&#104;&#110;&#115;&#x6f;&#x6e;&#x40;&#x67;&#x74;pd&#100;&#46;&#99;&#111;&#x6d;The post Golden Triangle Planning and Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
#### Vernie CHEATWOOD, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. A. McEVOY, Defendant in Error.

No. 35992.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 24, 1955.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 13, 1955.

Little & Hoyt, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Nagle & Spencer, Foster & Bowen, Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff sued the defendant to cancel an assignment of an interest in an oil and gas lease.

In petition the plaintiff alleged a state of facts, in substance, charging the defendant with fraud in the procurement of an instrument of conveyance of the leasehold interest from the plaintiff.

The defendant by answer and cross-petition made denial of any fraud'on the part of the defendant, and charged the plaintiff with fraudulent acts, whereby the defendant has been deprived of any benefit of a valid conveyance of leasehold interest by the plaintiff to the defendant, and whereby the plaintiff has received an assignment of certain royalty interest from the defendant. The defendant prayed judgment against the plaintiff in the amount of the value of the said leasehold interest and for the cancellation of the aforesaid assignment of royalty interest.

Trial resulted in judgment for the plaintiff for cancellation of the assignment of interest , in the oil and gas lease, and that plaintiff’s title in the leasehold estate involved be quieted as against the defendant, and that the defendant take nothing under, his cross-petition.

In appeal the defendant contends the judgment is against the clear weight of the evidence.

 The record reflects that the plaintiff testified to a state of facts in accord with *458the allegation^ of his-pleading, and presented some corroborative testimony and evi-= dénce, and that the defendant testified to a state of facts in accord with the allegations of his pleading and presented some corroborative testimony and evidence. Without doubt, the trial court before whom the witnesses testified is the better judge of the credibility of' -the witnesses, and of the weight to be given their testimony than this court, limited to a perusal of the record of the testimony. •

In a consideration of the whole record we find the judgment is not against the weight of the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and WELCH, CORN, ARNOLD, HALLEY, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ending September 27, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence J. Blanford, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 11, 2008                                    
|                                                           
|/s/ Lawrence J. Blanford                                   
|Lawrence J. Blanford* President and Chief Executive
Officer

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Green Mountain
Coffee Roasters, Inc. and will be retained by Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
                      EXHIBIT 27 - AMENDED
                                
                    FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
            (in thousands except per share amounts)
                                
       
<S>                                                 <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                                     12-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1995
   <PERIOD-END>                                      DEC-31-1995

   <CASH>                                            $    1,027
   <SECURITIES>                                               0
   <RECEIVABLES>                                              0
   <ALLOWANCES>                                               0
   <INVENTORY>                                                0
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       1,110
   <PP&E>                                               131,183
   <DEPRECIATION>                                        (2,219)
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       133,478
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  2,145
   <BONDS>                                               43,250
   <COMMON>                                                  61
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
   <PREFERRED>                                           50,000
   <OTHER-SE>                                            32,374
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         133,478
   <SALES>                                                    0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      11,921
   <CGS>                                                      0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (6,790)
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    (1,594)
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                                        2,895
   <INCOME-TAX>                                               0
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    2,895
   <DISCONTINUED>                                             0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
   <CHANGES>                                                  0
   <NET-INCOME>                                      $    2,895
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $     0.53
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                     $     0.52


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Daily Digest]
[Pages D862-D863]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     COMMITTEE MEETINGS FOR FRIDAY,

                           SEPTEMBER 14, 2012

        (Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated)

                                 Senate

  Committee on Armed Services: to receive a closed briefing on the 
situation in Syria, 9:30 a.m., SVC-217.
  Committee on Indian Affairs: to hold hearings to examine the 
nomination of Kevin K. Washburn, of New Mexico, to be Assistant 
Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, 2:30 p.m., SD-628.

                                 House

  Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Oversight and 
Investigations, hearing on Department of Defense Auditability 
Challenges, 9 a.m., 2118 Rayburn.
  Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Health, hearing 
entitled ``Title 42--A Review of Special Hiring Authorities'', 10 
a.m., 2123 Rayburn.

[[Page D863]]

  Committee on Financial Services, Subcommittee on Insurance, 
Housing and Community Opportunity, hearing entitled ``Housing for 
Heroes: Examining How Federal Programs Can Better Serve Veterans'', 
9:30 a.m., 2128 Rayburn.
  Committee on Homeland Security, Subcommittee on Oversight, 
Investigations, and Management, hearing entitled ``Lessons From Fort 
Hood: Improving our Ability to Connect the Dots'', 9 a.m., 311 
Cannon.
  Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Indian and Alaska 
Native Affairs, hearing entitled ``Per Capita Act and Federal 
Treatment of Trust Per Capita Distributions'', 11 a.m., 1324 
Longworth.
  Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, Full Committee, 
hearing entitled ``Recent Developments in NASA's Commercial Crew 
Acquisition Strategy'', 9:30 a.m., 2318 Rayburn.
  Committee on Veterans' Affairs, Subcommittee on Health, hearing 
entitled ``VA Fee Basis Care: Flawed Policies not a Fix for a Flawed 
System'', 9:30 a.m., 334 Cannon.
  Committee on Ways and Means, Subcommittee on Social Security, 
hearing entitled ``Securing the Future of the Social Security 
Disability Insurance Program'', 9:30 a.m., B-318 Rayburn.
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135573 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135573 

 COA: 281572 

Muskegon CC: 06-054055-FH

ANTHONY LEROY CAGE, JR.,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 3, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4643 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to the duties of the 

Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2017 

Mr. DEFAZIO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to 

the duties of the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 

Administration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Air Transport 

5 of Hazardous Materials Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DUTIES AND POWERS OF ADMINISTRATOR. 

7 Section 106(g)(1)(A) of title 49, United States Code, 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘aviation safety (except those re9 lated to transportation, packaging, marking, or descrip10 tion of hazardous material)’’ and inserting ‘‘aviation safeVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:48 Dec 15, 2017 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4643.IH H4643

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4643 IH

1 ty (including those related to transportation, packaging, 

2 marking, or description of hazardous material)’’. 

3 SEC. 3. PARTICIPATION IN INTERNATIONAL FORUMS. 

4 Section 5120(a) of title 49, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘The Admin6 istrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (or the 

7 designee of the Administrator) shall serve as the primary 

8 official representative of the United States on the Dan9 gerous Goods Panel of the International Civil Aviation Or10 ganization.’’. 

11 SEC. 4. AIR TRANSPORTATION OF LITHIUM CELLS AND 

12 BATTERIES. 

13 Section 828 of the FAA Modernization and Reform 

14 Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 44701 note), and the item relating 

15 to that section in the table of contents in section 1(b) of 

16 that Act, are repealed. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
### M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 225TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on March 11, 2015, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

AAA Free Move Ministorage L.L.C., Appellant

V.

Brigham Living Trust, Appellee

No. 04

- 14

- 00163

- CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2012

- CI

- 01363

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:



## In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s

Order Granting Defendant’s Traditional and No Evidence Motion for

Summary Judgment is AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that appellee recover costs of appeal from appellant.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on May 20, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853BILL OF COSTS



### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04

- 14

- 00163

- CV

AAA Free Move Ministorage L.L.C.

v.

Brigham Living Trust

(NO. 2012

- CI

- 01363 IN 225TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

REPORTER'S RECORD

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51

FEE

INDIGENT $10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$138.00

$100.00

$20.00

$50.00

$25.00 E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID GREGORY VANCLEAVE

KORTNEY KLOPPE

- ORTON

WILLIAM H. OLIVER

GREG VANCLEAVE

GREG VANCLEAVE

GREGORY VAN CLEAVE

PLAINTIFF

GREGORY VAN CLEAVE

GREGORY VAN CLEAVE

GREGORY VAN CLEAVE

GREGORY VAN CLEAVE

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

**Court costs in**  **this cause shall**  **be paid as**  **per the**  **Judgment issued by**  **this Court.** 

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this May 20, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
# Madison - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Creating PPE for Nurses and School Officials in Western North Carolina STEMwork in western North Carolina (WNCSTEMwork) is a teacher professional development initiative of the Kenan Institute for Engineering, Technology, and Science at North Carolina State University. With ARC support, this program supports six middle and high school teachers from ten counties as they develop their capacity to lead and sustain STEM workforce education. In April [&#8230;]The post Creating PPE for Nurses and School Officials in Western North Carolina appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Land-of-Sky Regional Council Executive Director Nathan Ramsey Email &#160;&#x69;&#110;&#x66;&#x6f;&#64;&#x6c;&#97;n&#x64;&#111;f&#x73;&#107;&#x79;&#x2e;o&#x72;&#103;The post Land-of-Sky Regional Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
November 2, 2015 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System We st Building Ground Floor, Room w12 - 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Wa shington D.C., 20590 Reference: Amendment to Measure’s Exemption No. 12646 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

–2015

– 1602 to include additional UAS (Unmanned Aircraft Systems). Dear Sir or Madam, Measure was issued exemption , no. 12646 (hereinafter referred to as t he exemption ) for operation in the national airspace. Measure , hereby requests an amendment to the exemption to allow additional Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) with no changes in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for the FAA granting the original exemption

. Measure wishes to operate the following ad ditional UAS:  HorseFly (http://workhorse.com/wp - content/uploads/2015/09/HorseFly- Spec- Sheet.pdf)  All UAS approved by the FAA on all Section 333 exemptions on and prior to November 2, 2015. Attached and submitted as confidential documents in a separat e correspondence , is the flight operation manuals for the HorseFly. All other UAS have been previously approved on exemptions by the FAA , so no further documentation is needed . All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of the exemption . As this is an amendment to the existing exemption requesting only the addition of other types of UAS, Measure respectfully submits that good cause exists so that the notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the req uested amendment. Sincerely, 

### Brandon Torres DecletBrandon Torres Declet CEO & Co - Founder Measure Mobile: + 1 202 251 8266 Office: +1 202 793 3052 bdeclet@measure.aero Tw itter: @BTD75 @droneasaservice measure.aero
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in these Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No’s. 33-76372,333-64691, 333-69044 and 333-103381) of our report dated February 2, 2004relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of MonacoCoach Corporation, which appears in Monaco Coach Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2004.

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |
|                            |
| Portland, Oregon                |
| March 15, 2004                  |

 

----