alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.7
                            PROMISSORY NOTE

                            PROMISSORY NOTE

Principal amount $41,795.94                         Date: February 13, 2004

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, RMD Technologies, Inc. hereby promise to
pay to the order of Patrick A. Galliher the sum of Forty One Thousand
Seven Hundred Ninety Five Dollars and Ninety Four Cents, together with
interest thereon at the rate of 1% per month on the unpaid balance.
Said sum shall be paid upon demand.

     This note shall at the option of any holder thereof be
immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of any of the
following:  1) Breach of any condition of any security interest,
mortgage, loan agreement, pledge agreement or guarantee granted as
collateral security for this note. 2) Breach of any condition of any
loan agreement, security agreement or mortgage, if any, having a
priority over any loan agreement, security agreement or mortgage on
collateral granted, in whole or in part, as collateral security for
this note. 3) Upon the death, incapacity, dissolution or liquidation
of any of the undersigned, or any endorser, guarantor to surety
hereto. 4) Upon the filing by any of the undersigned of an assignment
for the benefit of creditors, bankruptcy or other form of insolvency,
or by suffering an involuntary petition in bankruptcy or receivership
not vacated within thirty (30) days.

     In the event this note shall be in default and placed for
collection, then the undersigned agree to pay all reasonable attorney
fees and costs of collection. All payments hereunder shall be made to
such address as may from time to time be designated by any holder.

     The undersigned and all other parties to this note, whether as
endorsers, guarantors or sureties, agree to remain fully bound until
this note shall be fully paid and waive demand, presentment and
protest and all notices hereto and further agree to remain bound,
notwithstanding any extension, modification, waiver, or other
indulgence or discharge or release of any obligor hereunder or
exchange, substitution, or release of any collateral granted as
security for this note. No modification or indulgence by any holder
hereof shall be binding unless in writing; and any indulgence on any
one occasion shall not be an indulgence for any other or future
occasion. Any modification or change in terms, hereunder granted by
any holder hereof, shall be valid and binding upon each of the
undersigned, notwithstanding the acknowledgement of any of the
undersigned, and each of the undersigned does hereby irrevocably grant
to each of the others a power of attorney to enter into any such
modification on their behalf. The rights of any holder hereof shall be
cumulative and not necessarily successive. This note shall take effect
as a sealed instrument and shall be construed, governed and enforced
in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

                                       RMD Technologies, Inc.


                                       By: /s/  Pat Galliher
                                       Pat Galliher, President
#### SEARS v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, JOINT INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. NO. 35, JOHNSTON COUNTY.

No. 36041.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 25, 1954.

Geo. B. Forrester, Tishomingo, for plaintiff in error.

John Allen Phillips II, Durant, for defendant in error.

O’NEAL, Justice.

This action was commenced by D. B. Sears, hereinafter called plaintiff, to recov*320er $742.50 for work and labor performed and is against Board of Education, Joint Independent School District No. 35, Johnston County, defendant. An original and an amended petition was filed. Defendant demurred to the petition as amended and the demurrer was sustained. Judgment was entered for defendant and plaintiff appeals.

In the petition it is alleged that the work was done and performed between June 1950 and July 1951, and that there was a total amount of $942 due on which payment of $199.50 was made. The amended petition stated that the action was not to recover for supplies but was for work done on a schoolhouse to 'be used by the pupils of said district. This amended petition also alleged payments by warrants to other persons working on the building. Plaintiff cites Stayton v. Butchee, 16 Okl. 232, 82 P. 726. This case involves the location of a schoolhouse. We find no connection between this case and the issues presented in this appeal. Plaintiff also cites 70 O.S.1951 § 7-4. This section is in the chapter on annexation and consolidation. Likewise this section has no bearing on the question presented. In American Asbestos Products Co. v. Independent School Dist. No. 14, 196 Okl. 274, 164 P.2d 619, it is stated:

> “Legal indebtedness against an independent school district can be incurred only by its board of education in regular session, certified by the proper officer as being within the unencumbered balance of an appropriation made for the purpose, and a cause of action stated against such district which fails to disclose these essentials of a valid indebtedness is insufficient as against a general demurrer.”

In the opinion of said case it is stated:

> “A legal and binding contract against a school district can be made only by its board of education in regular session. Board of Education of Town of Carney v. News Dispatch Printing & Audit Co., 117 Okl. 226, 245 P. 884.”

Plaintiff contends that these principles of law do not apply to a contract of a school board for work and labor performed in remodeling a building into a school building, but cites no cases supporting his contentions. The cases cited are not in point. The case of American Asbestos Products Co. v. Independent School District No. 14, supra, relied upon by defendant is determinative of the question involved herein.

There was no allegation of a contract between plaintiff and defendant. Neither was there an allegation that there was a valid indebtedness within a valid unencumbered balance of an appropriation for said work and labor.

There was no error in sustaining the demurrer to the petition as amended and entering judgment for defendant.

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-20178

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

DANG HAI NGUYEN, also known as Cong Chi Le, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:13-CR-303-1 

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Dang Hai Nguyen has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Nguyen has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow

us to make a fair evaluation of Nguyen’s claim of ineffective assistance of 

counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 27, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-20178 Document: 00513926731 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/27/2017
No. 16-20178

2 

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). 

The motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED as untimely. See 

United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Nguyen’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-20178 Document: 00513926731 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/27/2017
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5933]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 IN TRIBUTE TO AMBASSADOR CHRIS STEVENS

  (Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California asked and was given permission 
to address the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his 
remarks.)
  Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California. Mr. Speaker, it is with a heavy 
heart that all Americans reflect upon the tragic loss of life in the 
American consulate in Benghazi. When one of our own pays the ultimate 
sacrifice in the service of our Nation, we're all touched by the loss. 
All four of these brave Americans will forever be remembered in the 
annals of American history as heroes.
  In particular, I would like to take the time to pay tribute to 
Ambassador Chris Stevens, a native of northern California. Although I 
did not know the Ambassador personally, his father, Senior Assistant 
Attorney General Jan Stevens, ably served our State in the California 
Department of Justice while I served as attorney general of my home 
State.
  This tragedy hits close to home with all of the employees of the 
California Department of Justice who work with Jan Stevens. I wish to 
join with them, with friends and family members of the Stevens, and 
with all Americans in offering our thoughts and prayers as we mourn the 
loss of Ambassador Chris Stevens.

                          ____________________
```
GRANDp-ISLAND

CAMBER

RESOLUTION

WHEREAS, reliable, affordable air service is critical to the future growth and

development of the central Nebraska area; and

WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Transportation's Essential Air Service (EAS)

program was Implemented to ensure that small communities retain a minimal level

of scheduled air service and accomplishes this by subsidizing the cost of air service;

and

WHEREAS,the Central Nebraska Regional Airport is eligible for Essential Air

Service subsidies through the U.S. Department of Transportation; and

WHEREAS, American Airlines, through its regional carrier American Eagle, was

selected to provide daily non-stop air service from Grand Island to Dallas/Fort

Worth in 2012 and provides travelers with the ability to connect to flights

throughout the United States as well as internationally to South America, Asia

and Europe; and

WHEREAS, in 2014, nearly 23,000 passengers utilized the American Eagle flights

serving Dallas/Fort Worth which is 39%of all flights into or out of the Central

Nebraska Regional Airport; and

WHEREAS, in 2015, the U.S. Department of Transportation requested bids for

Essential Air Service (EAS) flights for the Central Nebraska Regional Airport,

and through its regional carrier American Eagle, American Airlines submitted

the lone bid; and

WHEREAS,the bid from American AirLines requested a federal subsidy in the

amount of $1,270,707, a decrease of $565,000 to continue the Dallas/Fort

Worth flights for 2015 and 2016 and;

WHEREAS, the Department of Transportation will, following input from the

Grand Island community, issue a decision designating the successful air carrier

and specifying the air service provided.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEDBY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORSFOR THE

GRAND ISLAND AREA CHAMBEROF COMMERCE,that the U.S. Department of

Transportation be encouraged to accept the bid of American Airlines, through
its regional carrier, American Eagle, as the Essential Air Service provider for

the Central Nebraska Regional Airport.

Adopted this 11th day of March, 2015

BOARDOF DIRECTORS

GRAND ISLANDAREA CHAMBEROF COMMERCE

Certified by its Board Chair and President
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1632-E1633]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     HONORING ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL -

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. MICHAEL H. MICHAUD

                                of maine

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. MICHAUD. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to congratulate St. Joseph 
Hospital on being recognized as a Thomson Reuters Top 100 Hospital.
  Founded in 1947 by the Felician Sisters, St. Joseph Hospital has 
proudly served community members from the Bangor area for three 
quarters of a century. St. Joseph is committed to wellness promotion 
and holistic healing by providing healthcare services which embody 
compassion, competence and community. It is this commitment that has 
helped them secure the Reuters Top 100 Hospital designation.
  The Thompson Reuters 100 Hospital study evaluates performance in a 
variety of areas, including patient safety, average patient stay, 
expenses, medical complications and patient satisfaction. St. Joseph 
was chosen from nearly 3,000 U.S. hospitals for demonstrating high-
quality patient care and overall organizational excellence.
  St. Joseph Hospital, under the umbrella of St. Joseph Healthcare, is 
a 112-bed acute community hospital. They provide a comprehensive range 
of health care services, including primary care, specialty services, 
diagnostics imaging and screening, outpatient and inpatient surgery. 
The Hospital is consistently recognized for its quality of care and 
patient satisfaction scores. In addition to this

[[Page E1633]]

praise, the St. Joseph's commitment to providing low cost care 
reinforces the organization as an indispensible piece of the greater 
Bangor community.
  Mr. Speaker, please join me again in congratulating St. Joseph 
Hospital, and their parent organization St. Joseph Healthcare on their 
designation as Thomson Reuters Top 100 Hospital.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4697 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4697

   To amend the Wyoming Wilderness Act of 1984 to clarify authorized 
    recreational uses in the Palisades, High Lakes, and Shoal Creek 
                        Wilderness Study Areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2017

  Ms. Cheney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Wyoming Wilderness Act of 1984 to clarify authorized 
    recreational uses in the Palisades, High Lakes, and Shoal Creek 
                        Wilderness Study Areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECREATIONAL USES; ACCESS POINTS FOR PALISADES, HIGH LAKES, 
              AND SHOAL CREEK WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS.

    Section 301(c) of the Wyoming Wilderness Act of 1984 (Public Law 
98-550; 98 Stat. 2811) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``; and'' and inserting a 
        semicolon;
            (2) by amending paragraph (4) to read as follows:
            ``(4) subject to paragraph (5), all recreational uses 
        occurring within such Wilderness Study Areas on the date before 
        the day of the enactment of this Act, including horseback 
        riding, snowmobiling, dirt bike riding, mountain biking, and 
        helicopter skiing, shall be permitted in such Areas;''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
            ``(5) with respect to helicopter skiing in the Palisades 
        Wilderness Study Area, the Secretary shall authorize the number 
        of permitted days of helicopter skiing to be at least the 
        number of days specified in the High Mountain Heli-Skiing Final 
        Environmental Impact Statement for certain national forest 
        districts in Wyoming and Idaho issued on June 30, 2005, by the 
        Forest Service; and
            ``(6) no recreational access points shall be constructed in 
        such Wilderness Study Areas after the date of the enactment of 
        this paragraph, except by express authorization of Congress.''.
                                 <all>
```
ASLAN Technologies Inc.

Thomas Aslan

PO Box 426 Newberry, FL 33669

tmaj2@cox.net

January 26, 201 6

U.S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

Re: FAA

- 2016

- 2330

- 0001 Amendment

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to ask that my petition, posted on 01/25/2016

, be extended to include a new UAS. The new

UAS is a DJI Inspire. (See appendix A below for user manual). When reviewing my petition for

exemption, please include the DJI Insp ire as well as the listed UASs (DJI Phantom 3 Professional, DJI

S800, & DJI S900) in your decision making process. If approved I would like to use each of these UAS in

my commercial flights.

Thank you,

Tommie Aslan

See Next Pages for Appendix AAppendix A: User Manual
# Strategy - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Virginia Strategy Statement The post Virginia Strategy Statement appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Tennessee Strategy Statement The post Tennessee Strategy Statement appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Mississippi Strategy Statement The post Mississippi Strategy Statement appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- West Virginia Strategy Statement The post West Virginia Strategy Statement appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Alabama Strategy Statement The post Alabama Strategy Statement appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Georgia Strategy Statement The post Georgia Strategy Statement appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Kentucky Strategy Statement The post Kentucky Strategy Statement appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Maryland Strategy Statement The post Maryland Strategy Statement appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Ohio Strategy Statement The post Ohio Strategy Statement appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- South Carolina Strategy Statement The post South Carolina Strategy Statement appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dresser, Inc. (Dresser) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2004 (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dresser as of the dates and for periods
presented as required by such Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 15, 2004



/s/ Steven G. LambSteven G. Lamb Chief Executive Officer and President
EXPERT CONSENT


I, Dinara Nussipakynova, do hereby consent to (i) the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled “Prairie Creek Property Northwest Territories, Canada Technical Report for Canadian Zinc Corporation” with an effective date of June 15, 2012 and other mineral resource and reserve information pertaining to the Prairie Creek Property in the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) for the year ended December 31, 2012 of Canadian Zinc Corporation (the “Company”) and in the Management Discussion & Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2012 of the Company, and (ii) the use of my name in the AIF, the MD&A and the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012 and any amendments thereto incorporating by reference the Company’s AIF, MD&A and the Annual Report on Form 40-F.


Dated this 19th day of March, 2013.


/s/Dinara Nussipakynova
   Name: Dinara Nussipakynova, P. Geo.







1
FIFTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AND
                          NON-COMPETITION AND AGREEMENT

      This Fifth Amendment is made on the 28th day of February 2005, by and
between STEPHEN P. HERBERT ("Herbert"), and USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a
Pennsylvania corporation ("USA").

                                   Background

      USA and Herbert entered into an Employment And Non-Competition Agreement
dated April 4, 1996, a First Amendment thereto dated as of February 22, 2000, a
Second Amendment thereto dated April 15, 2002, a Third Amendment dated as of
July 25, 2003, and a Fourth Amendment thereto dated February 4, 2004
(collectively, the "Agreement"). As more fully set forth herein, the parties
desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects.

                                    Agreement

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants set forth herein, and
intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:

      1. Amendment. The date "June 30, 2005" appearing in the first and second
sentences of subparagraph (a) of Section 1. Employment. of the Agreement is
hereby deleted and the date "June 30, 2007" is hereby substituted in its place.

      2. Modification. Except as otherwise specifically set forth in Paragraph
1, the Agreement shall not be amended or modified in any respect whatsoever and
shall continue in full force and effect.


<PAGE>

      3. Capitalized Terms. Except as specifically provided otherwise herein,
all capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in
the Agreement.

      4. Effective Time. The amendment to the Agreement made in Paragraph 1
hereof shall be effective from and after February 3, 2005.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Fifth Amendment
on the day and year first above written.



                                      /S/ Stephen P. Herbert
                                      -----------------------------------
                                      STEPHEN P. HERBERT

                                      USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


                                 By:  /S/ George R. Jensen, Jr.
                                      -----------------------------------
                                      George R. Jensen, Jr.,
                                      Chief Executive Officer