alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6831

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EDDIE EUGENE TURNER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-962, CA-98-3464) Submitted: September 9, 1999 Decided: September 15, 1999 Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie Eugene Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Eddie Turner seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Turner’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded sixty days if the United States is a party after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The court’s order dismissing Turner’s § 2255 motion was entered on the docket on December 18, 1998. Turner filed a motion to reconsider, and it was denied on January 15, 1999. Turner then filed a motion to enlarge the time to file a response to the court’s order. The court denied the motion on February 24, 1999. Turner’s notice of appeal was dated June 9, 1999 and was received in the district court on June 11, 1999. Because Turner failed to file a timely notice of appeal and was not granted an extension orreopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in3 the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.9


                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                              -------------------


     This  second  amendment  (this  "Amendment")  is made on this  18th  day of
February,  1998 to the Employment Agreement,  dated February 1, 1996, as amended
as of September  1, 1997,  by and between  Joel  Freedman and IDM  Environmental
Corp., a New Jersey  corporation (the "Employment  Agreement").  All capitalized
terms not defined herein shall be defined as in the Employment Agreement.

     Pursuant  to and in  accordance  with  Section  7.01 of Article  VII of the
Employment  Agreement,  the  parties  hereto  agree  to  modify  the  Employment
Agreement as follows:

     1. Section 2.06 of Article II of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted
in its entirety and replaced with the following:


               "2.06  Stock  Option  Grant.  The  Company  hereby  grants to the
               Employee an option to  purchase  from the Company Two Million Two
               Hundred Fifty Thousand  (2,250,000) shares of the common stock of
               the Company, $0.001 par value, at an exercise price of $3.719 per
               share subject to the terms and conditions set forth on Appendix A
               attached hereto and made a part hereof."               


     2. This  Amendment  and the  provisions  set  forth  herein  are  effective
immediately and are merged into and made a part of the Employment Agreement.  

F:\legal\corporate\ffjf
frdmn2am.wpd

<PAGE>


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the day and
date herein first set forth. IDM ENVIRONMENTAL CORP.


                                        By: /s/  Frank A. Falco
                                          ------------------------------------
                                             Frank A. Falco, Chairman



                                        EMPLOYEE:
                                          ------------------------------------
                                             Joel Freedman


F:\legal\corporate\ffjf
frdmn2am.wpd
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6233]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. CARSON of Indiana:
       H.R. 6457.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, section 8, clause 1 of the United States 
     Constitution grants Congress the implied power to provide 
     grants to enhance the most effective freezing methods to 
     improve access to affordable and locally produced specialty 
     crops.
```
DISMISS; Opinion Filed February 7, 2013. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 00604
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF K .N.K. A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 06
- 17012
- S

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Francis and Lang Opinion by Justice Moseley By letter dated May 8, 2012, we notifed appellant the $175 filing fee in this case was du e. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the fee within ten days would result in dismissal of the appeal. By letter dated July 25, 2012, we informed appellant that the Dallas County Clerk’s
Office had notified us that the clerk’s record had not bee n filed in this case because appellant had not paid the clerk’s fee for the record. We directed appellant to, within ten days, file verification of payment or written documentation that appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of
costs. We cautio ned appellant that failure to file the required documentation might result in dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, provided verification that she has paid for the clerk’s record, provided written documentation that she is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.2 Therefore, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b),(c).

Jim Mos eley JIM MOSELEY JUSTICE
120604F.P05120604.op.docx 3 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

EX PARTE IN THE INTE REST OF K.N.K. A MINOR CHILD
No. 05

- 12

- 00604

- CV On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 06

- 170 12

- S. Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley. Justices Francis and Lang participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee Nitin Khanna recover his costs of this appeal from appellant Tara Khanna.

Judgment entered this 7th day of February, 2013.

/Jim Moseley/ JIM MOSELEY JUSTICE
Exhibit 99.17




EXPERT CONSENT
 I, Christine Devine, do hereby consent to (i) the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate on the Lemarchant Deposit, South Tally Pond VMS Project, Central Newfoundland,Canada" dated March 2, 2012 and other technical information pertaining to the South Tally Pond Property in the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) for the year ended December 31, 2013 of Canadian Zinc Corporation (the “Company”) and (ii) the use of my name in the AIF and the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto incorporating by reference the Company’s AIF.
 Dated this 20thday of March, 2014.
 /s/ Christine Devine
 Name: Christine Devine
#### Clarence HALL, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-13110.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Jan. 10, 1962.

Joe Tom Smith, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

BUSSEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence based on an information filed in the District Court of Tulsa county, Oklahoma, charging that Clarence Hall “did unlawfully, lewdly and feloniously, expose his person and private parts in a place, to-wit: Pee Wee Park in the City of Sand Springs in Tulsa County, Oklahoma, and in a place where there were present other persons to be offended and annoyed thereby, * * * ” On April 26, 1961, defendant was arraigned and plead not guilty. Case was set for trial on June 8, 1961. On this date a jury was impaneled and the state introduced its evidence. At the conclusion of same defendant entered a plea of guilty to “outraging public decency”, and on June 29, 1961, the court pronounced sentence at 6 months in the county jail. From this judgment and sentence this appeal has been perfected.

Defendant waived his oral argument which was set for November 29, 1961, and no brief has been filed. Under these conditions this court has repeatedly held that we can search the record only for fundamental error and none being found the judgment and sentence will be affirmed. Riner v. State, 82 Okl.Cr. 442, 172 P.2d 345; Hulsey v. State, 82 Okl.Cr. 332, 169 P.2d 771; Epps v. State, 69 Okl.Cr. 460, 104 P.2d 262.

We have carefully examined the transcript and find no fundamental error. This appeal is therefore Affirmed.

NIX, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. §1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
        ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of IVI Communications, Inc., (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        the
        undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
                  November 20, 2006
              
              /s/ Nyhl
                HensonNyhl
                  Henson
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 12, 2021

NO. 03

- 20

- 00402

- CV

Mainthia Technologies, Inc. and Hemant Mainthia, Appellant s

v.

Recruiting Force, LLC d/b/a Recruit Veterans, on behalf of itself and derivativ e ly on behalf of RVMTI, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 425TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the tr i a l court on July 21, 2020

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no r eversible error

in the trial court’s interlocutory order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s interlocutory

order

. The appellant s shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the

court below.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 10, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1574-1575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00280]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[DOCKET NO. 24-01]


Visual Comfort & Co., Complainant v. COSCO Shipping Lines (North 
America) Inc., Respondent; Notice of Filing of Complaint and Assignment

Served: January 4, 2024.
    Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal 
Maritime Commission (the ``Commission'') by Visual Comfort & Co. (the 
``Complainant'') against COSCO Shipping Lines (North America) Inc. (the 
``Respondent''). Complainant states that the Commission has 
jurisdiction over the complaint pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 41301 through 
41309 and personal jurisdiction over Respondent as an ocean common 
carrier as defined in 46 CFR 520.2.
    Complainant is a corporation organized under the laws of Texas with 
its principal place of business located in Houston, Texas, and is a 
shipper as defined in 46 U.S.C. 40102(23).
    Complainant identifies Respondent as a Chinese global ocean carrier 
with an office in the United States located in Secaucus, New Jersey, 
and as a vessel-operating ocean common carrier as defined in 46 U.S.C. 
40102(18).
    Complainant alleges that Respondent violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(c) and 
41104(a)(10) and 46 CFR 545.5 regarding a failure to establish, 
observe, and enforce just and reasonable practices relating to 
receiving, handling, storing, and delivering property; and an 
unreasonable refusal to deal or negotiate. Complainant alleges these 
violations arose from assessment of demurrage, detention, per diem, and 
yard storage charges during periods of time in which the charges were 
not just or reasonable because of circumstances outside the control of 
the Complainant and its agents and service providers, and because of 
acts or omissions of the Respondent.
    An answer to the complaint must be filed with the Commission within 
25 days after the date of service.
    The full text of the complaint can be found in the Commission's 
electronic Reading Room at https://www2.fmc.gov/readingroom/proceeding/24-01/. This proceeding has been assigned to the Office of 
Administrative Law Judges.

[[Page 1575]]

The initial decision of the presiding judge shall be issued by January 
6, 2025, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by 
July 21, 2025.

Alanna Beck,
Federal Register Alternate Liaison Officer, Federal Maritime 
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-00280 Filed 1-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6151]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. UPTON:
       H.R. 6433.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the United States 
     Constitution.
```
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 441 

To provide for additional security requirements for Syrian and Iraqi refugees, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2017 

Mr. CALVERT (for himself, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. KNIGHT, and Mr. HUNTER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for additional security requirements for Syrian 

and Iraqi refugees, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secure Accountability 

5 for Emigres and Refugees Act of 2017’’ or the ‘‘SAFER 

6 Act of 2017’’. 

7 SEC. 2. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR SYRIAN AND IRAQI 

8 REFUGEES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Prior to admitting to the United 

10 States as a refugee under section 207 of the Immigration 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 441 IH

1 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1157) a covered alien, the 

2 Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the 

3 Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the 

4 Director of National Intelligence, shall ensure that the 

5 covered alien— 

6 (1) has taken and passed a lie detector test, as 

7 determined by the Secretary; 

8 (2) has submitted to the Secretary biometric 

9 identification information, including DNA, which the 

10 Secretary has compared against all relevant data11 bases and determined that the covered alien has no 

12 known history of engaging in terrorist activity (as 

13 such term is defined in section 212(a)(3)(B)(iv) of 

14 the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

15 1182(a)(3)(B)(iv))); and 

16 (3) does not pose a threat to the national secu17 rity of the United States based on a background 

18 check that the Secretary conducts, which includes a 

19 review of the covered alien’s interactions on and 

20 posting of material to the Internet (including social 

21 media services), and for purposes of which, the alien 

22 has submitted to the Secretary such information as 

23 the Secretary determines necessary. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 441 IH

1 (b) COVERED ALIEN.—The term ‘‘covered alien’’ 

2 means an alien applying for admission to the United 

3 States as a refugee who— 

4 (1) is a national of Iraq or Syria; 

5 (2) has no nationality and whose last habitual 

6 residence was in Iraq or Syria; or 

7 (3) has been present in Iraq or Syria at any 

8 time on or after March 1, 2011. 

9 (c) SUNSET.—This Act shall cease to have effect on 

10 the date that is 10 years after the date of the enactment 

11 of this Act. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Congressional Record UNUM

E PLURIBUS

United States

of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 112th

 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION

∑ This ‘‘bullet’’ symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor.

.

S6391 

Vol. 158 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2012 No. 125 

House of Representatives 

The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, September 18, 2012, at 12 noon. 

Senate 

MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2012 

The Senate met at 2 and 13 seconds 

p.m., and was called to order by the 

Honorable CHRISTOPHER COONS, a Senator from the State of Delaware. 

f 

APPOINTMENT OF ACTING 

PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE 

The PRESIDING OFFICER. The 

clerk will please read a communication 

to the Senate from the President pro 

tempore (Mr. INOUYE). 

The assistant bill clerk read as follows: 

U.S. SENATE, 

PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE

Washington, DC, September 17, 2012. 

To the Senate: 

Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, 

of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby 

appoint the Honorable CHRISTOPHER COONS, a 

Senator from the State of Delaware, to perform the duties of the Chair. 

DANIEL K. INOUYE, 

President pro tempore. 

Mr. COONS thereupon assumed the 

chair as Acting President pro tempore. 

f 

ADJOURNMENT UNTIL 10 A.M., 

WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2012 

The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under the previous order, the 

Senate stands adjourned until 10 a.m. 

on Wednesday, September 19, 2012. 

Thereupon, the Senate, at 2 and 41 

seconds p.m., adjourned until Wednesday, September 19, 2012, at 10 a.m. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with SENATE
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Beulah M. GAMBILL.

No. 1973.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 25, 1939.

Whit Y. Mauzy, U. S. Atty., of Tulsa, Okl.

Hugh Webster, of Tulsa, Okl., for appellee.

Before LEWIS and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.
Exhibit 12.1


<TABLE>
                                  COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                                   (IN THOUSANDS)

                                               Year Ended December 31,

<CAPTION>
                                 1996        1995        1994        1993        1992

<S>                         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         
Net loss                    $ (100,070) $  (52,816) $  (30,610) $   (9,643) $  (21,323)
Add:
    Fixed charges per (b)      144,681      82,911      29,346      16,847      14,939
      below

Earnings for computation
    purposes (a)            $   44,611  $   30,095  $   (1,264) $    7,204  $   (6,384)
Fixed Charges:
    Interest Costs          $  141,380  $   81,094  $   27,699  $   12,912  $   10,687
    Amortization of Debt 
      issue costs                3,301       1,817         406         531         427
    Preference Returns             ---         ---       1,241       3,404       3,825

Total Fixed Charges (b)     $  144,681  $   82,911  $   29,346  $   16,847  $   14,939

Ratio of earnings to
    fixed charges (a)/(b)   $      ---  $      ---  $      ---  $      ---  $      ---  

Deficiency of earnings
    to cover fixed charges  $ (100,070) $  (52,816) $  (30,610) $   (9,643) $  (21,323)

</TABLE>
CALCULATIONS NEEDED FOR ROCIS

Part I: Information Collection Request14. Annual Cost to Federal Government

$47,717

Part II: Information Collection Detail9. RespondentsTotal number: 19Small entity number: 010. FrequencyCalculated Annual Frequency: 5.3Calculated Annual Number of Responses: 101

161.

11. Hour and Cost Burden

Hours per 

Response %of responses

Avg. hours per 

response

Total Annual 

Hour Burden

Cost per Response 

(Capital/Startup and 

O&M Costs)

Total Annual Cost 

Burden (Capital/Startup 

and O&M Costs) Comments

Reporting 30 0.13 30 3,052 $131 $13,273Recordkeeping 207 0.87 207 20,910Third Party DisclosureTotals 237 237 23,963 $131.42 $13,273.3312. Allocate the change in Burden

Total 

Requested

Change Due to 

New Statute

Change Due to 

Agency Decision Due to Agency Estimate Change due to Violation Previously Appr

Annual Responses 101 -114 215

Annual Hour Burden 23,963 -102,264 126,227

Annual Cost Burden (Capital/Startup and O&M Costs) $13,273.33

* ICR approval had expired and never renewed. This was the original approved level after pro

average annual respondent burden = 1,261 

G:\USER\SHARE\_CCG\RTR Bins 1&2_august2010\1_Docket\2-KC Review Completed-ready to submit to docket\ICR\Pand R I\P&R I_ICR_Tables 071310.xlsROCIS Inputs
|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reconstruction Data Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott B. Baker, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)



The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|\s\              Scott B. Baker
|-------------------------------
|Scott B. Baker                 
|President                      



August 14, 2002

---
----

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August 16, 2010  | By:    | /s/ Michael L. Peterson       |
|----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                                   |   | Michael L. Peterson           |
|                                   |   | Interim President and CEO     |
|                                   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |