alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
4th Amendment of Employment Agreement, June  29, 2003 for David A. Levin



 Exhibit 10.17 
  
 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 WHEREAS, Casual
Male Retail Group, Inc., (formerly Designs, Inc., “CMRG”) and David A. Levin (“Executive”) entered into a certain Employment Agreement dated as of March 31, 2000, as amended by Letter Agreement dated April 10, 2001, Second
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated January 30, 2003 and by Third Amendment to Employment Agreement dated July 9, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, Company and Executive wish to amend, modify and/or restate certain terms, provisions, conditions, and covenants of the Agreement.

  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and of the promises,
covenants, conditions and agreements contained herein, and for One Dollar ($1.00) and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby expressly acknowledged, the Company and Executive hereby agree to amend
the Agreement as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 3 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following is hereby substituted in lieu thereof: 

  
 “3.    COMPENSATION 
  
 As Compensation for the employment services to be rendered by the Executive
hereunder; the Company agrees to pay to Executive, and Executive agrees to accept, payable in equal installments in accordance with Company practice an annual base salary of $575,000, effective as of May 1, 2004.” 
  

	2.	Except as herein specifically modified and amended, all of the terms, provisions, conditions, and covenants of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and shall be
deemed unchanged except to the extent modified and amended herein. 

  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment to Employment Agreement as a sealed instrument, in any number of counterpart copies, each of which shall be deemed an original for all purposes, as of the day and
year first written below. 
  
 CASUAL MALE RETAIL GROUP, INC. (Company)

  
  

							
				
	By:	 	/s/    DENNIS R.
HERNREICH              	 	 	 	June 29, 2004
	 	 	 Dennis R. Hernreich
 Executive Vice
President,
 Chief Operating Officer,
 Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer
 and Secretary
	 	 	 	Date
				
	 	 	  
 Executive
  
  
 /s/    DAVID A.
LEVIN                          
	 	 	 	June 29, 2004
	 	 	David A. Levin	 	 	 	Date
# Rowan - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Gateway Area Development District Executive Director Joshua Farrow Email &#x6a;o&#x73;&#104;u&#x61;&#46;&#x66;&#97;r&#x72;&#111;&#x77;&#64;k&#x79;&#46;&#x67;&#x6f;vThe post Gateway Area Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
1 Juniper	Unmanned	Inc. John S. Duncan UAS Integration Office

Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 2059 12/18 / 2015

Subject: Docket FAA

- 2015

- 2487

- 0001

, Petition for Amendment u nder Exemption No.

13671

.

Juniper Unmanned, Inc. was granted FAA exemption No. 13671 on November 18, 2015 allowing the use of specified unmanned aircraft for commercial purposes. This pet ition for amendment is Juniper Unmanned, Inc. seeking to add additional aircraft to their existing exemption. The r equest ed aircraft are: DJI’s Phantom 3 , Phantom 3

Professional and Inspire; Trimble’s UX5, UX5 HP and ZX5; and Pulse Aerospace’s Vapor

35 and Vapor 55.

Granting this amendment woul d not adversely affect safety. The FAA has co ncluded in exemption number 11238A, 11110

, 11110 A, 11 110B, and 12062 that the above
request ed aircraft provide a level of safety that is equal to, or great er than, that provided by the ru le from which exemption is sought. The general reasoning is that the operations that would be conducted by these systems would otherwise be conducted by heavy, fuelled, manned aircraft which is incredibly hazardous comparably

.

The addition of the above specified aircraft would be in the public interest primarily because it will enhance Juniper Unmanned’s primary objective of providing a functio nal

and safe s UAS operations

. T his amendment would allow Juniper Unmanned to provide a comprehens ive training, repair/service, and testing program for its customers who operate, or seek to operate, the DJI Phantom 3, the DJI Inspire, the Trimble UX5, UX5 HP, ZX5, the Pulse Aerospace Vapor 35 and Vapor 55

.

Juniper Unmanned, Inc. will comply with all conditions and limitations outlined in exemption number 13671 with the exception of number 1 which will need to include the newly approved aircraft

. The operating documents will be sent separately to the FAA at 333exemptions@faa.gov

. These will also be a dded to the list of documents in the current exemption.

Juniper Unmanned, Inc. hope s to expedite the approval of this amendment and, therefore, ask s that it not be published in the Federal Register. This requested amendment would not set any precedent n or raise any novel issue

. We ask that no public notice or vote be necessary.2 Juniper	Unmanned	Inc. T hank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Jeff Cozart, CEO

3490 Parfet St,

Wheat Ridge, CO 80033

Phone: 303

- 907

- 6163

J eff. cozart@juniperunmanned.com
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5708]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia:
       H.R. 6278.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Clause 1 of section 8 of article I of the Constitution, and 
     clause 18 of section 8 of article I of the Constitution.
```
<PAGE> 1
                                                               Exhibit 10.4 (g)
                                 AMENDMENT NO.2
                                        
                                       to
                                        
                                   WICKES INC.
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                          1993 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
                                        
                                        
      The  Wickes Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Long-Term Incentive  Plan  (the
"Plan") is hereby amended as follows:

     1.  Section X of the Plan is amended by adding the following paragraph:

          "K.   Maximum Annual Awards. The number of shares of Common Stock with
                ---------------------
          respect to which Awards may be granted during any calendar year to any
          Key Employee shall not exceed 60,000.

     2.  Section XIII of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

     "XIII.  Effective Date.
             --------------

           "The  Plan was adopted and became effective on October 6,  1993,
     and  this  Amendment and Restatement was adopted on November 30,  1994
     and  became  effective May 16, 1995.  The Plan was further amended  on
     December 11, 1996 by Amendment No. 1, which became effective  May  20,
     1997.   The  Plan was further amended on January __, 1998 by Amendment
     No.  2, which shall become effective the date on which more than fifty
     percent  (50%)  of  the shareholders of the Company entitled  to  vote
     thereon approve such Amendment No. 2."


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Wickes Inc. acting by and through its officer hereunto
duly  authorized, has executed this instrument, as of the 16th day of  February,
1998.


                         WICKES INC.



                         By:

                                        1
#### WESTERN FARMERS ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, a Corporation of Anadarko, Oklahoma, Plaintiff, v. C. H. ANDERSON and Mrs. C. H. Anderson, Defendants.

No. 36486.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Sept. 27, 1955.

*726H. C. Ivester, Sayre, Harry C. Hicks, Hollis, for plaintiff in error.

Oden & Oden, Ryan Kerr, Yates & Braddock, Altus, for defendants in error.

DAVISON, Justice.

Except for the amount of the verdict and judgment and the identity of the land involved and of the defendants the instant case presents generally the same issues as were in cause number 36485, Western Farmers Electric Cooperative v. Yates, 288 P.2d 723. However, the case at bar does not involve exceptional damage to an isolated field as did the Yates case, supra, and consequentially the verdict was materially less. The testimony of the different witnesses as to the amount of damage varied widely, ranging from amounts considerably below the amount of the judgment to amounts considerably above the same. The clear weight of the evidence, however, amply supported the verdict of the jury and the judgment of the court based thereon.

The same reasoning and rules of law being here controlling, the opinion in said cause number 36485 is adopted as the opinion herein.

Judgment affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and WELCH, CORN, BLACKBIRD, and JACKSON, JJ., concur.

HALLEY, J., dissents.
# NOTES

# Data_QRT_EMP_ARC_Regions

# Chart_QRT_EMP_Appalachia

# Chart_QRT_EMP_Appalachia

# Chart_QRT_EMP_Appalachia_US

# Chart_QRT_EMP_Appalachia_US

# Chart_QRT_EMP_State Parts

# Chart_QRT_EMP_State Parts

# Data_QRT_EMP_ARC_Counties

# Data_ANN_EMP_ARC_Regions

# Chart_ANN_EMP_Appalachia

# Chart_ANN_EMP_Appalachia

# Chart_ANN_EMP_Appalachia_US

# Chart_ANN_EMP_Appalachia_US

# Chart_ANN_EMP_State Parts

# Chart_ANN_EMP_State Parts

# Data_ANN_EMP_ARC_Counties

# Data_QRT_PROD_ARC_Regions

# Chart_QRT_PROD_Appalachia

# Chart_QRT_PROD_Appalachia

# Chart_QRT_PROD_Appalachia_US

# Chart_QRT_PROD_Appalachia_US

# Chart_QRT_PROD_State Parts

# Chart_QRT_PROD_State Parts

# Data_QRT_PROD_ARC_Counties

# Data_ANN_PROD_ARC_Regions

# Chart_ANN_PROD_Appalachia

# Chart_ANN_PROD_Appalachia

# Chart_ANN_PROD_Appalachia_US

# Chart_ANN_PROD_Appalachia_US

# Chart_ANN_PROD_State Parts

# Chart_ANN_PROD_State Parts

# Data_ANN_PROD_ARC_Counties
Exhibit 10.18
                                ENDORSEMENT NO. 4
                           (TERMINATION ENDORSEMENT)
                                       to
                          MULTIPLE LINE EXCESS OF LOSS
                        REINSURANCE AGREEMENT NO. 6404-09

                                     between

                         PENN-AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY
                              Hatboro, Pennsylvania
                   (hereinafter referred to as the "COMPANY")

                                       and

                        NATIONAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION
                              Stamford, Connecticut
                  (hereinafter referred to as the "REINSURER")



<PAGE>
                                      -2-

IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED that effective at 12:01 a.m., May 1, 1996, this Agreement
is terminated. The REINSURER shall not be liable for any losses occuring after
the effective time and date of termination, in consideration of which the
REINSURER shall return to the COMPANY the unearned premium, if any, less
applicable commission, as respects business the subject matter hereof, in force
at the time and date of termination.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Endorsement No. 4 to be
executed in duplicate, in Hatboro, Pennsylvania, this 31st day of December,
1996.


                                             PENN-AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY

                                             /s/ John DiBiasi

ATTEST: /s/ Sheila McNamee

And in Stamford, Connecticut, this 24th day of June, 1996.


                                             NATIONAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION

                                             /s/ Paul DeStefano

ATTEST: /s/ Diane E. DeSiano
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7367NATHANIEL HAMPTON JONES, a/k/a Nathaniel Hampton, a/k/a Nathaniel Jones, a/k/a Nathaniel H. Jones, Petitioner - Appellant, versusWILLIAM DAVIS, Warden of Lee Correctional Institution; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-2299-2-13AJ) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 18, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathaniel Hampton Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Davis , No. CA-97-2299-2-13AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 9 (Friday, January 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 2469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00482]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12305]


Notice of Charter Renewal of the Advisory Committee on 
International Postal and Delivery Services (IPODS)

SUMMARY: This notice announces the renewal of the charter of the 
Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery Services 
(IPODS).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Stuart Smith, Chief, International 
Postal Affairs, in the Office of Specialized and Technical Agencies 
(IO/STA), Bureau of International Organization Affairs, U.S. Department 
of State, at tel. (202) 663-3017, by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#66350b0f120e352b5126151207120348010910"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b1e2dcd8c5d9e2fc86f1c2c5d0c5d49fd6dec7">[email protected]</span></a> or by 
mail at IO/STA, L409 (SA1); Department of State, 2401 E Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20037.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the provisions of the 
2006 Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (Pub. L. 109-435) and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Committee's 
charter has been extended until December 20, 2025.
    The Department of State uses the IPODS Committee to remain informed 
of the interests of users and providers of international postal and 
delivery services. The Assistant Secretary of State for International 
Organization Affairs appoints members of the committee, including 
representatives of the Department of Commerce, the Department of 
Homeland Security, the Office of the United States Trade 
Representative, the Postal Regulatory Commission, the Military Postal 
Service Agency, and the United States Postal Service.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1001 et seq. and 5 U.S.C. 552)

Stuart M. Smith,
Designated Federal Officer, Advisory Committee on International Postal 
and Delivery Services, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-00482 Filed 1-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CONSENT OF ALAN B. TAYLOR


Reference is made to the technical report entitled “Technical Report”dated December 29, 2011, which the undersigned has prepared for Canadian Zinc Corporation (the “Technical Report”).
   I hereby consent to the inclusion of references to my name and references to, and information derived from, the Technical Report, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Canadian Zinc Corporation, and the documents incorporated therein by reference, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, in connection with the filing of the annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 of Canadian Zinc Corporation.
   Dated this 16th day of March, 2012.


/s/Alan B. Taylor
  Name: Alan B. Taylor, P. Geo







1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6466
THERON JOHNNY MAXTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus A. MATTOX, Sergeant, MSU; VAUGHN JACKSON, Captain, MSU; J. D. WESSINGER, Deputy Warden, MSU, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Caro lina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-2152-3-6BC) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Theron Johnny Maxton, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas McKay, Jr., Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY, MCKAY, HENRY & FOSTER, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Maxton v. Mattox , No. CA-95-2152-3-6BC (D.S.C. Mar. 12, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2008–2012

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

A poverty rate is the ratio of the persons below the poverty level 

to the total number of persons for whom poverty status has been 

determined.The percent of the U.S. average is computed by 

dividing the county poverty rate by the national average and 

multiplying by 100. The map uses critical breaks such as the 

national average to organize the data into groups of common 

values. 

Map Created: March 2014

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2008–2012

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

150.0% - 278.2%

100.1% - 149.9% 

75.1% - 100.0% 

44.9% - 75.0%

Percent of the U.S. Average 

(Critical Breaks Classification) 

U.S. average = 14.9%

Appalachian average = 16.6%
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4989 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4989

To require the Department of State to establish a policy regarding the 
 use of location-tracking consumer devices by employees at diplomatic 
            and consular facilities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2018

    Mr. Castro of Texas (for himself and Mr. McCaul) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Department of State to establish a policy regarding the 
 use of location-tracking consumer devices by employees at diplomatic 
            and consular facilities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Diplomats from 
Surveillance Through Consumer Devices Act''.

SEC. 2. SECURE UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR FACILITIES AGAINST 
              CYBERSURVEILLANCE.

    (a) Policy on Location-Tracking Consumer Devices.--Not later than 
60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
State shall establish a policy on the use of location-tracking consumer 
devices, including GPS-enabled devices, at United States diplomatic and 
consular facilities by United States Government employees, contractors, 
locally employed staff and members of other agencies deployed to or 
stationed at such facilities.
    (b) Security Briefing.--Existing and new employees at United States 
diplomatic and consular facilities, including contractors, locally 
employed staff, and members of other agencies deployed to or stationed 
at such facilities, shall, as a part of the security briefings provided 
to such employees, be informed of the policy described in subsection 
(a) and given instructions on the use of location-tracking consumer 
devices both on and off the premises of such facilities.
    (c) Coordination.--The Secretary of State may coordinate with the 
heads of any other agencies whose employees are deployed to or 
stationed at United States diplomatic and consular facilities in the 
formulation of the policy described in subsection (a) and the 
dissemination of such policy pursuant to subsection (b).
    (d) Report.--Not later than 30 days after the formulation of the 
policy described in subsection (a), the Secretary of State shall submit 
to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on the 
details of such policy.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.28

September 19, 1996




Tim Walsh
7212 Fleetwood Drive
Edina, Minnesota  55439


Dear Tim:

I am pleased to offer you a position as Vice President of Sales and Marketing
with IVI Publishing, Inc., located at 7500 Flying Cloud Drive, Minneapolis, MN
55344, beginning on October 1, 1996.

Our compensation offer to start is $110,000/year plus you would be eligible for
commissions and bonuses based on an annual plan.  Our offer also includes a
$10,000 signing bonus and 30,000 stock options which are subject to Board
approval.  In addition, IVI offers  a benefit package involving health, dental,
disability, life insurance, Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and 401(K)
participation.  Our Personal Time Off policy involves up to five weeks of paid
time off.  IVI observes 8 standard corporate holidays.

Tim, I am excited to have you join the team at IVI Publishing, Inc. and I look
forward to working with you.


Best Regards,


/s/ Joy Solomon
-----------------------

Joy Solomon
President and CEO
IVI Publishing, Inc.



cc: Personnel
Exhibit
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Gammacan International Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chaime
      Orlev, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(3)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(4)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.











Date:
                August 9, 2006
            By:*/s/
                CHAIME ORLEV*Chaime
                OrlevChief
                Financial Officer








27