alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tandy Leather Factory, Inc.
      (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
      United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), Wray Thompson, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Shannon
      L. Greene, as Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|i. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|ii. | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




March
                27, 2006
            By:/s/
                WRAY THOMPSONWray
                ThompsonChairman
                of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerMarch
                27, 2006
            By:/s/
                SHANNON L GREENEShannon
                L. GreeneChief
                Financial Officer and
                Treasurer
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4624 

To amend section 240(c)(7)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to 

eliminate the time limit on the filing of a motion to reopen a removal 

proceeding if the basis of the motion is fraud, negligence, misrepresentation, or extortion by, or the attempted, promised, or actual practice 

of law without authorization on the part of, a representative. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 12, 2017 

Mr. VEASEY (for himself, Mr. AGUILAR, Ms. NORTON, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. 

TAKANO, Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. 

VARGAS, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, and Ms. JACKSON LEE) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 240(c)(7)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the time limit on the filing 

of a motion to reopen a removal proceeding if the basis 

of the motion is fraud, negligence, misrepresentation, 

or extortion by, or the attempted, promised, or actual 

practice of law without authorization on the part of, 

a representative. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4624 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Notario Victim Relief 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF TIME LIMIT ON MOTIONS TO RE5 OPEN IN CERTAIN CASES. 

6 Section 240(c)(7)(C) of the Immigration and Nation7 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1229a(c)(7)(C)) is amended by adding 

8 at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(v) FRAUD, NEGLIGENCE, MISREPRE10 SENTATION, OR EXTORTION BY, OR AT11 TEMPTED, PROMISED, OR ACTUAL PRAC12 TICE OF LAW WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION

13 ON THE PART OF, A REPRESENTATIVE.— 

14 There is no time limit on the filing of a 

15 motion to reopen if the basis of the motion 

16 is to apply for relief due to fraud, neg17 ligence, misrepresentation, or extortion by, 

18 or attempted, promised, or actual practice 

19 of law without authorization on the part 

20 of, a representative described in subsection 

21 (a) or (b) of section 1292.1 of title 8, Code 

22 of Federal Regulations, or a person who 

23 claimed to be such a representative, and 

24 the alien establishes such fraud, neg25 ligence, misrepresentation, or extortion by, 

26 or attempted, promised, or actual practice 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4624 IH

1 of law without authorization on the part 

2 of, such a representative (or person) by a 

3 preponderance of evidence.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME OF MONACO COACH CORPORATION
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                       140
<INVENTORY>                                     46,930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,889
<PP&E>                                          41,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 135,368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,387
<BONDS>                                         16,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,687
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   135,368
<SALES>                                        365,638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               365,638
<CGS>                                          317,909
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  351,897
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,914
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,071
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,162
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,909
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,909
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.26
        

</TABLE>
# Opportunity Zones - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Jennifer Simon Program Manager.The post Jennifer Simon appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 10.1

              BELDEN CDT INC. ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE PLAN (SUMMARY)

The Belden CDT Inc. Annual Cash Incentive Plan provides for an annual bonus. The
bonus criteria for the CEO and the other executive officers are based on
earnings per share from continuing operations (67%) and working capital as a
percentage of revenues (33%).

The Compensation Committee establishes the performance goals at the beginning of
the year. The Company's overall financial performance determines the size of the
bonus pool to be distributed to the members of management participating in the
program. The annual incentive bonuses are calculated by the Committee as a
percentage of the management members' base salary midpoint.
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please

2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated

4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does

5 not include the filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

8 Plaintiff-Appellee,

9 v. NO. 31,109

10 CHANCE BENTRY ROBERTS,

11 Defendant-Appellant.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY

13 Mike Murphy, District Court Judge

14 Gary K. King, Attorney General

15 Andrew S. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General

16 Santa Fe, NM 

17 for Appellee

18 Jacqueline Cooper, Acting Chief Public Defender

19 Will O’Connell, Assistant Appellate Defender

20 Santa Fe, NM

21 Robert E. Tangora LLC

22 Robert E. Tangora

23 Santa Fe, NM

24 for Appellant
2

1 MEMORANDUM OPINION

2 VIGIL, Judge.

3 Defendant appeals the district court’s ex parte order of unsatisfactory discharge

4 from probation. In our notice, we proposed to reverse and remand for issuance of an

5 order of satisfactory discharge. In response, the State and Defendant have filed a joint

6 motion to adopt the proposed disposition with the modification that instead of remand

7 for issuance of an order of satisfactory discharge, the remand should be for dismissal

8 of the charge.

9 We agree that the appropriate remedy in this case is dismissal pursuant to

10 NMSA 1978, Section 31-20-9 (1963). This section applies to deferred sentences and

11 their expiration. Thus, “[w]henever the period of deferment expires, the defendant is

12 relieved of any obligations imposed on him by the order of the court and has satisfied

13 his criminal liability for the crime, [and] the court shall enter a dismissal of the

14 criminal charges.” 

15 Here, based on the reasoning in the calendar notice, the period of deferment

16 expired without entry of an order imposing sentence. Therefore, Defendant is entitled
3

1 to have the charges against him dismissed. This case is reversed and remanded for

2 entry of an order of dismissal of the charges.

3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

4 _______________________________

5 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

6 WE CONCUR:

7 _________________________________

8 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

9 _________________________________

10 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T ROGELI O CON CHAS- FE RNAN DEZ, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 73855 A ge nc yN o. A 092- 294- 084 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r14, 2010 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dT H O M A S , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R oge l i o C onc ha s - F e rnande z , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or r e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to a c c e p t an u n tim e lyb r ie f . O u rju r is d ic tio n is g o v e rn e db y8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e B I A ’s r e

je c tio n o f

a n u n tim e lyb r ie f

, Zet i no v. 

# FI LED JAN 06 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 73855 2 H older , 6 2 2 F .3 d1 0 0 7 , 1 0 1 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) , an dw e d e n yin p art an dd is m is s in p a rt th e p e titio n f

o rr e v ie w . T h e B IA w as w i th i n i t s d i scret i o n i n d ecl i n i n g t o accep tC o n ch asF e rn a n d e z ’s u n tim e lyb r ie f . Se e Ze t i no , 622 F . 3d a t1013 ( c onc l udi ng the ap p l i c ab l e r e g u l a t i o n s i n d i c a t e th e B I A “ could h ave c o n s id e r e d ” th e b r ie f , b u t it w as u n d er n o o b l i g at i o n t o d o so , an dth e B IA d i dn o tactarb i trari l y, i rrat i o n al l y, orc ontr a ryt o the l aw i n de ny i ng i t ) . C onc ha s - F e rnande z ’ s c ont e nt i ons tha tthe B IA di d n otadequat el y e xp l ai n i t s r ea son for decl i ni ng t o acc eptthe un t i m el y bri ef o ra d d r e s s h is in e f

f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l c la im a r e b e lie db yth e r e c o r d . C f. G arci a-G om ezv. G on zales , 49 8 F . 3d 10 50 , 10 51 (9th C i r. 20 07 ). W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w C onc ha s - F e rnande z ’ s c ont e nt i ons r e gar di ng el i g i b i l i ty fo r a 2 1 2 (c) w ai v er an dv o l u n t ary d ep artu re b ecau se h e fai l edt o rai se the s e i s s ue s be f

or e the B I A a nd the r e byf a i l e d t o e xhaus thi s a dm i ni s tr a t i ve r e m e d ie s . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 35 8 F . 3d 67 4, 67 8 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
# C_2008327EN.01003101.xml

| 20.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/31

---

Action brought on 22 September 2008 — MIP Metro v OHIM — CBT Comunicación Multimedia (Metromeet)

(Case T-407/08)

(2008/C 327/57)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Dusseldorf, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: CBT Comunicación Multimedia, SL (Getxo, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 June 2008 in Case R 387/2007-1 as it is incompatible with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark and refuse application No 37 405 29 for the Community trade mark ‘metromeet’; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 June 2008 in Case R 387/2007-1 as it is incompatible with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark and refuse application No 37 405 29 for the Community trade mark ‘metromeet’;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those of the opposition and appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those of the opposition and appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: CBT Comunicación Multimedia, SL

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘Metromeet’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 35 and 41 — Application No 3 740 529

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: MIP Metro

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The national figurative mark ‘METRO’ and the word mark ‘meeting metro’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 35 and 41

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the decision of the Opposition Division and rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 in that there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

Pleas in law:

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135573 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135573 COA: 281572 Muskegon CC: 06-054055-FH ANTHONY LEROY CAGE, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 3, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

l0317 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2008

Clerk
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6232]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. PRICE of North Carolina:
       H.R. 6448.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Congressional power to provide for public financing of 
     presidential campaigns arises under the General Welfare 
     Clause, Art. I, Sec. 8, of the Constitution. In Buckley v. 
     Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 91 (1976), the Supreme Court upheld the 
     congressional power to enact public financing of presidential 
     elections under this Clause. The Supreme Court stated with 
     regard to the provisions in the Federal Election Campaign Act 
     Amendments of 1974 establishing a presidential public 
     financing system, ``In this case, Congress was legislating 
     for the `general welfare'--to reduce the deleterious 
     influence of large contributions on our political process, to 
     facilitate communication by candidates with the electorate, 
     and to free candidates from the rigors of fundraising.''
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 2251

DERRICK M. ALLEN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. BRUNSWICK COUNTY FINANCE DEPARTMENT; ALTA THOMAS, Human Resource Coordinator; BRUNSWICK COUNTY SHERIFF ’ S OFFICE; A. W. CONNELL, Deputy; BRUNSWICK COUNTY; MAYOR SCOTT MARTIN , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. M. Hannah Lauck , District Judge. ( 3:21

- cv - 00486

- MHL )

Submitted : March 24, 2022 Decided: March 28, 2022

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Derrick Michael Allen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Derrick M. Allen appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Allen v. Brunswick Cnty. Fin. Dep’t , No. 3:21

- cv - 00486

- MHL (E.D. Va. Oct. 22, 2021) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this co urt and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

The Board of Directors 

Penn-America Group,Inc. 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-8 No. 33-82728 and Form S-3 No. 333-33474) of our report dated January 17, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Penn-America Group, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of theCompany for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/ Ernst and Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 9, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 3 (Thursday, January 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28959]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; K76 Beeson Review.
    Date: March 7, 2024.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Gianina Ramona Dumitrescu, Ph.D., M.P.H., 
Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National 
Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 
4193-C, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-827-0696, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2044554d495452455343555247604353520e4e49480e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9efaebf3f7eaecfbedfdebecf9defdedecb0f0f7f6b0f9f1e8">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 28, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-28959 Filed 1-3-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

                                   Pursuant to

         Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") of MCG Capital Corporation (the
"Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Janet C. Perlowski, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

                                              /s/ JANET C. PERLOWSKI
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Name:  Janet C. Perlowski
                                              Date:  November 14, 2002





     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.