alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM 

To: File 

From: Mark Schuknecht 

Subject: RMA Meeting with Acting Director ORCR 

Date: November 10, 2010 

Rubber Manufacturers Association (RMA) meeting with Suzanne Rudzinski Acting 

Director ORCR; Nov. 10, 2010. 

Michael Blumenthal, representing RMA, made six points during the meeting: 

1. Described the value of the RCC Scrap Tire Workgroup in fostering recycling 

and eliminating dangerous tire piles. He requested continued EPA support for 

the Workgroup. He explained the need for continued travel funding to enable 

States and Regions to meet annually. Highly supportive of Scrap Tire 

Workgroup. 

2. Encouraged work on EPA website on Scrap Tires. 

 

3. Encouraged EPA to assist and encourage participation of tribal scrap tire 

programs. 

4. Inquired of EPA plans for the Border Project continued support and requested 

EPA plans. 

5. Expressed concern for potential adverse impact of Definition of Solid Waste 

(Whole Tires) & 112/129 Rulemaking on TDF Market place. 

6. Inquired as to whether ORCR wishes to continue working with the IRC on 

IMR activities. In this context, he mentioned two specific activities: 

A. Does ORCR plan an RCC meeting in March as has been done in previous 

years? (Margaret responded that nothing is presently scheduled.) 

B. FHWA has asked the IRC to arrange a 2-day IMR workshop in Austin, 

TX, in November 2011. FHWA plans to fund travel for State DIT officials to 

attend the workshop. Michael asked whether ORCR would like to participate 

in the workshop in any way. He requested ORCR response by December. 

7. Mentioned their concern about the proposed rule regarding non-hazardous 

secondary materials as it impact scrap tires. 
No ORCR responses were provided at the meeting. 

EPA asked clarifying questions regarding the current management of scrap tires. 

Attendees: 

Micheal Blumenthal RMA 

Suzanne Rudzinski, EPA ORCR 

Margaret Guerriero, EPA ORCR 

Tab Tesnau, EPA, ORCR 

Truett Degeare, EPA, ORCR 

Kinbery Cochran, EPA ORCR 

Mark Schuknecht , EPA ORCR
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Martha Kirby, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Pano Patsalos, J.), rendered November 1, 1988, convicting her of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the amended judgment is modified, on the law, by reversing the convictions for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree, vacating the sentences imposed thereon, and dismissing those counts of the indictment; as so modified, the amended judgment is affirmed.

We agree with the defendant’s contention that the People failed to disprove the defense of justification to the reckless endangerment charge beyond a reasonable doubt *(see,*Penal Law § 35.20 [3]; *see generally, People v Wesley,*76 NY2d 555; *People v Goetz,*68 NY2d 96). The contents of the defendant’s written statement to the police, which the People introduced into evidence, were sufficient as a matter of law to raise a reasonable doubt as to whether her actions were justified. Furthermore, under the circumstances of this case, the evidence failed to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant possessed the handgun with the intent to use it unlawfully against another *(see, People v Tejada,*101 AD2d 757).

We have examined the contentions raised in the defendant’s supplemental *pro se*brief. To the extent that the contentions can be reviewed on this record, we find that they do not warrant a reversal of her conviction for criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. Bracken, J. P., Harwood, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4786 

To require State and local law enforcement agencies to promptly report 

the loss or theft of any firearm to the National Tracing Center, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2018 

Mr. MEEKS (for himself, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, 

Mr. DESAULNIER, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ, Mrs. WATSON

COLEMAN, Mr. HIMES, Mr. ELLISON, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. 

QUIGLEY, Mr. SUOZZI, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. EVANS, Ms. NORTON, Ms. 

JAYAPAL, Mr. BLUMENAUER, and Ms. KELLY of Illinois) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require State and local law enforcement agencies to 

promptly report the loss or theft of any firearm to the 

National Tracing Center, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Commu5 nities from Lost or Stolen Law Enforcement Weapons Act 

6 of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4786 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO REPORT LOSS OR THEFT OF 

2 FIREARM. 

3 A law described in this section is a law of a State 

4 that requires a State or local law enforcement officer, if 

5 that State or local law enforcement officer carries a fire6 arm in the performance of or otherwise has custody of a 

7 firearm in the course of his or her duties, and that State 

8 or local law enforcement officer determines that such fire9 arm has been lost or stolen, to report the loss or theft 

10 immediately to that officer’s supervising officer, and re11 quires the State or local law enforcement agency that em12 ploys the officer to report such loss or theft, not later than 

13 48 hours after the report of the officer, to the National 

14 Tracing Center of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and 

15 Firearms of the Department of Justice. 

16 SEC. 3. PRIORITY FOR COPS GRANTS. 

17 Section 1701(c) of the Omnibus Crime Control and 

18 Safe Streets Act of 1968 is amended— 

19 (1) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

20 end; 

21 (2) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking the period 

22 at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

23 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

24 ‘‘(4) from an applicant in a State that has in 

25 effect a law that is described in section 2 of the ProVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:38 Jan 13, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4786.IH H4786

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4786 IH

1 tecting Communities from Lost or Stolen Law En2 forcement Weapons Act of 2017.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA IN RE THE PETITION OF PABLO PERHACS

PR 22-0004

OCT

1 9 2022 Bowen Greenwood cf Supreme Court i tttientilontana Pablo Perhacs has petitioned this Court for admission

to active statusin the State Bar of Montana after having been onsenior status since April 2019. IT IS ORDERED that upon payment
of the appropriate fees tothe State Bar of Montana, Petitioner shall be admitted
tothe active practice of law in the stateof Montana. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within six months of the date of this Order, Petitioner shall submit tothe Board of Continuing Legal Education, P.O. Box 577, Helena, MT 59624, proof of attendance

at thirty hours of approved Continuing Legal Education

to be credited
tothe time Petitioner wasoninactive status. The Clerk is directed
to provide copies of this Order to Petitioner and tothe State B arof Montana. DATED this

' k day of October, 2022. For the Court, Chief Justice10/20/2022Case Number: PR 22-0004
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4771 

To raise the consolidated assets threshold under the small bank holding 

company policy statement, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2018 

Mrs. LOVE (for herself, Mr. GOTTHEIMER, and Mr. MEEKS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To raise the consolidated assets threshold under the small 

bank holding company policy statement, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Bank Holding 

5 Company Relief Act of 2018’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4771 IH

1 SEC. 2. CHANGES REQUIRED TO SMALL BANK HOLDING 

2 COMPANY POLICY STATEMENT ON ASSESS3 MENT OF FINANCIAL AND MANAGERIAL FAC4 TORS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Before the end of the 6-month pe6 riod beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

7 the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 

8 shall revise the Small Bank Holding Company Policy 

9 Statement on Assessment of Financial and Managerial 

10 Factors (12 C.F.R. part 225—appendix C) to raise the 

11 consolidated asset threshold under such policy statement 

12 from $1,000,000,000 (as adjusted by Public Law 113– 

13 250) to $3,000,000,000. 

14 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subparagraph (C) 

15 of section 171(b)(5) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Re16 form and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 

17 5371(b)(5)) is amended to read as follows: 

18 ‘‘(C) any bank holding company or savings 

19 and loan holding company that is subject to the 

20 application of the Small Bank Holding Com21 pany Policy Statement on Assessment of Finan22 cial and Managerial Factors of the Board of 

23 Governors (12 C.F.R. part 225—appendix C).’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5803]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  ADJOURNMENT UNTIL 9:30 A.M. TOMORROW

  Mr. LIEBERMAN. If there is no further business to come before the 
Senate, I ask unanimous consent that it adjourn under the previous 
order.
  There being no objection, the Senate, at 7:14 p.m., adjourned until 
Wednesday, August 1, 2012, at 9:30 a.m.

                          ____________________
```
2320 Shasta Way, Unit H, Simi Valley , California 93065

P hone & FAX: 818

- 938

- 4215 www.Pictorvision.com U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

April 08, 2016

Re: Amendment to Exemption 11067 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA

Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket

No. FAA

- 2014

- 0357.

Dear Sir or Madam;

Pictorvision Inc. has been issued Exemption number 11067 (hereinafter the Exemption). This letter is requesting the following changes to our Exemption:

1. The primary contact for FAA

- 333

- related issues at Pictorvision has changed to Chris White, Executive Vice President, 818

- 938

- 4215, cwhite@pictorvision.com;

2. Pictorvision is notifying the FAA of our change of business address to: 2320 Shasta Way, Unit H, Simi Valley, CA 93065;

3. P ictorvision is now partnering with CineMoves Inc, located at the same address as Pictorvision. CineMoves is directly renting Pictorvision’s equipment, including the sUAS inventory that has been approved for use with our Exemption, to our

mutual customers. We are requesting that CineMoves be added to our Exemption and that all of the existing Certificates of Authorizations (COAs) that have been approved for use by Pictorvision also be available for use by CineMoves.

Please let us know if you require any add itional information to approve these requests.

Sincerely,

Chris White

Executive Vice President
**Exhibit
      32.2**








KERR-McGEE
      CORPORATION


123
      Robert S. Kerr Avenue


Oklahoma
      City, Oklahoma 73102








**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**REGARDING
      PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING**


**FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS**








I,
      Robert M. Wohleber, the Chief Financial Officer of Kerr-McGee Corporation (the
      "Issuer"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify in connection
      with
      the Issuer's Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period that ended June 30,
      2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") that:


·
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
                  the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
  ·
              information
                  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                  the
                  financial condition and results of operations of the
                  Issuer.
 
 
 /s/
        Robert M. Wohleber
 ______________________
 
 Robert
        M. Wohleber
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 August
        8, 2005
Table of Contents


Exhibit 12.2

Certification

I, Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A. de C.V.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 18, 2006

| |                             
| | ----------------------------
| | /s/ Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez
| | Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez    
| | Chief Financial Officer     



---
EXHIBIT 10.3


 


Summary Description of Incentive Compensation Arrangement for Iron Mountain Incorporated’s Executive Officers



        Iron
Mountain Incorporated (the “Company”) has an incentive compensation arrangement
for executive officers that is unwritten and informal.  It is generally set during the
first three months of the fiscal year for that fiscal year.  Criteria, such as gross
revenues and Operating Income Before Depreciation and Amortization (OIBDA), are selected,
and targets for such criteria are selected.  Bonuses ranging from 30% to 100% of the
executive officer’s base salary are paid, depending on targets being met at various
levels, following the end of the fiscal year.  The targets for criteria are adjusted
by management during the year for acquisitions and other major unbudgeted events.  The
criteria set for fiscal year 2005 are gross revenues, OIBDA and a discretionary element.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6541]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      MESSAGES FROM THE PRESIDENT

  Messages from the President of the United States were communicated to 
the Senate by Mr. Thomas, one of his secretaries.

                          ____________________
```
# Polk - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Northwest Georgia Regional Commission Executive Director Boyd Austin Email &#x62;&#x61;&#x75;&#x73;&#x74;&#x69;&#x6e;&#64;&#110;&#119;&#103;&#114;c&#46;or&#x67;The post Northwest Georgia Regional Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
#### Arthur F. LARRABEE, Appellant, v. Eugene BISCAILUZ, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, Cal., Appellee.

No. 9216.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 17, 1939.

Sherman & Sherman and Lee Stanton, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Buron Fitts, Dist. Atty., and Jere J. Sullivan, Deputy Dist. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the transcript of record, and of briefs filed by respective parties, and after oral argument, ordered appeal herein dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and mandate issue as provided in Rule 28 of this Court.
Table 1

EPA APPROVED OREGON STATE STATUTES

477.515 Permits required for fires on forestlands; waiver; permit conditions; smoke 

management plan; restricted areas; rules; excepted areas. 

(1) It is unlawful to set or cause to be set on fire any forestland, including flammable forest

growth, forest refuse, slashing or forest debris, or any grass, grain, stubble, debris or other such 

flammable material, within the boundaries of a forest protection district or within one-eighth of 

one mile of a forest protection district for which a closed season has been designated under ORS 

477.505, or when required under rules promulgated pursuant to subsection (3) of this section 

either on one's own land or on the land of another, without first securing a written permit from

the forester or a warden and complying with the conditions of the permit. The forester may 

waive the requirement that the permit referred to in this section be secured prior to burning 

whenever conditions are such as to justify oral permission.

(2) In granting permits, the forester or any warden may prescribe conditions necessary to be 

observed in setting a fire and preventing it from spreading. Any permit obtained through willful 

misrepresentation is void.

(3)(a) For the purpose of maintaining air quality, the State Forester and the Department of 

Environmental Quality shall approve a plan for the purpose of managing smoke areas they shall 

designate. The plan shall delineate restricted areas to which this subsection applies. The plan 

shall also include but not be limited to considerations of weather, volume of material to be 

burned, distance of the burning from designated areas, burning techniques, and provisions for 

cessation of further burning under adverse air quality conditions. All burning permitted within 

the restricted areas shall be according to the plan. The plan shall be developed by the State 

Forestry Department in cooperation with federal and state agencies, landowners and 

organizations which will be affected by the plan. The approved plan shall be filed with the 

Secretary of State and may thereafter be amended in the same manner as its formation.

(b) The State Forester shall promulgate rules to carry out the provisions of the smoke 

management plan approved under this subsection.

(4) The requirements of this section do not apply to lands protected pursuant to ORS 476.010 to 

476.730 and 476.990 or ORS chapter 478, or lands protected within a city and for which lands a 

burning permit is required under such authority. 

State effective: 1971; EPA effective: 12/31/2001; 66 FR 55105
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4890 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4890

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 9801 Apollo Drive in Upper Marlboro, Maryland, as the ``Wayne K. 
                     Curry Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAYNE K. CURRY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9801 Apollo Drive in Upper Marlboro, Maryland, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Wayne K. Curry Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Wayne K. 
Curry Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4890

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 9801 Apollo Drive in Upper Marlboro, Maryland, as the ``Wayne K. 
                     Curry Post Office Building''.
```
Summary Description of Director Compensation



 EXHIBIT 10.37 
  
 Summary Description of Director Compensation 
  
 Each non-employee director of Community Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”), currently receives $500 per quarterly meeting in compensation for
service as director. Non-employee members of the Company’s Executive Committee, Nominating Committee, Executive Compensation Committee, Audit Committee and Pension and ESOP Administrative Committee receive a fee of $250 per meeting. Each
non-employee director of the Company who is also a director of Community Bank (the “Bank”) receives a monthly fee of $1,500 plus $500 per meeting held in excess of one meeting per month. Non-employee members of the Bank’s Executive
Committee, Audit Committee and Asset Quality Committee received $250 per meeting. Non-employee members of Community Bank’s Directors Credit Committee receive a monthly fee of $500. Each of the non-employee directors of 1st Community Credit Corporation, Community Insurance Corp. and Community Appraisals, Inc. receive a quarterly fee of $500.

  
 On January 27, 2004, each non-employee director was granted an
option to purchase 25,000 shares of Company common stock at an exercise price of $5.35 per share, the fair market value of the stock on the date of the grant. 
  

The compensation of directors may be changed from time to time by the Board of Directors upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee without
shareholder approval.