alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4913 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 816 East Salisbury Parkway in Salisbury, 

Maryland, as the ‘‘Sgt. Maj. Wardell B. Turner Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4913 EH

1 SECTION 1. SGT. MAJ. WARDELL B. TURNER POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 816 East Salisbury Parkway in 

5 Salisbury, Maryland, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Sgt. Maj. Wardell B. Turner Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sgt. Maj. Wardell 

11 B. Turner Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4913 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostWardell B. Turner Post Office Building’’. in Salisbury, Maryland, as the ‘‘Sgt. Maj. al Service located at 816 East Salisbury Parkway
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1378]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        HONORING ROBERT D. GRANT

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. MIKE QUIGLEY

                              of illinois

                    in the house of representatives

                       Wednesday, August 1, 2012

  Mr. QUIGLEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor and express my 
gratitude to Robert D. Grant, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago 
office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. He is retiring from his 
position as head of the Chicago FBI after an outstanding 29 years of 
distinguished service to this country.
  In 1983, Mr. Grant began his career with the FBI and has since served 
in Memphis, New York, and San Antonio, along with several different 
assignments at FBI headquarters here in Washington, D.C., including 
Chief Inspector.
  Mr. Grant spent his time with the FBI committed to improving all 
areas of operations and has brought tremendous changes to fruition. In 
2005, Mr. Grant became the head of the Chicago office, where he is now 
the longest serving agent-in-charge in the history of that office.
  During his time in Chicago, Mr. Grant has overseen numerous widely-
recognized investigations, from corrupt public officials to our most 
violent criminals.
  He was at the forefront of the indictment and convictions of several 
high-ranking members of the Chicago Mafia and played a key role in the 
arrest of two Chicago men on charges related to the 2008 terror attacks 
in Mumbai, India.
  Throughout his career, Mr. Grant has received numerous accolades for 
his impressive service, ranging from local community group recognition 
to the 2008 Presidential Rank Service Award.
  While acknowledging Special Agent-in-Charge Grant today for his three 
decades of service, we also reaffirm our appreciation to all of the 
brave men and women of the United States law enforcement community, who 
work every day to protect our families and keep our country safe.
  Once more, we thank Mr. Grant for his integrity, leadership, and 
dedication to the FBI and our country. And we wish him the best of luck 
in his future endeavors.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher Greenwood, certify that:

1.   I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10  QSB  of  San  Jose
     International, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the  period  covered by this
     quarterly report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
     procedures  (as  defined in Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and I have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during  the  period in which  this  quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
          the disclosure  controls and procedures  based on our evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of directors  (or
     persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6.   I have  indicated  in this  report  whether or not there  were  significant
     changes in internal  controls or in other factors that could  significantly
     affect  internal  controls  subsequent  to  the  date  of our  most  recent
     evaluation,  including any  corrective  actions with regard to  significant
     deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: May 12, 2004


By: /s/ Christopher Greenwood
   --------------------------------
   Christopher Greenwood
   President and CEO
DATA SNAPSHOT

EDUCATION IN APPALACHIA

Find more data on this and other topics at www.arc.gov/chartbook

Source: American Community Survey, 2011-2015

APPALACHIA U.S.

30.5% vs. 34.7%

STEM DEGREE

More than of Appalachians

age 25+ with a bachelor’s

degree earned it in a STEM field.

The share of adults age 30%

25+ with a bachelor’s 

degree is lowest in Central 

Appalachia and highest 

in Southern Appalachia.

BACHELOR’S DEGREE BY SUBREGION

Central Appalachia

Southern Appalachia

U.S.

29.8%

24.5%

13.3%

22.6%

of Appalachians age

25+ hold a bachelor’s

degree, compared 

with 29.8% of adults

in the U.S.

BACHELOR’S DEGREE

8.2%

of Appalachians age

25+ have an associate’s

degree. This is slightly

higher than the U.S.

average of 8.1%.

ASSOCIATE’S DEGREE

Appalachia

U.S.

HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA

85.5%

of Appalachians age

25+ have earned a 

high school diploma—

close to the U.S. average

of 86.7%
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1575]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION, 2013

                                 ______
                                 

                               speech of

                           HON. RUSH D. HOLT

                             of new jersey

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 13, 2012

  Mr. HOLT. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of the Continuing Resolution 
(H.J. Res. 117) to fund the federal government through March 2013.
  This bipartisan spending bill staves off the devastating costs 
recommended by my Republicans colleagues and instead continues the 
funding levels for the operations of federal agencies at last year's 
levels. I am pleased that this measure extends the services on which 
New Jersey families rely such as Small Business Administration, SBA, 
loan guarantees, Veterans Administration, VA, disability claims, and 
natural disaster relief. It preserves the necessary funding for 
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, TANF, and Supplemental 
Nutrition Assistance Program, SNAP.
  This compromise is by no means perfect, however. I am disappointed 
that this measure does not take any steps to invest in innovation, 
improve math and science education, make college more affordable, or 
help grow industries such as biotechnology and clean energy. I regret 
that this bill freezes the pay of hardworking federal employees who 
have already had years of pay freeze. Under this spending bill, no new 
programs will be funded. Unfortunately, this means that none of the 
important new programs--such as anti-distracted driving campaigns--
authorized in the recently passed MAP-21 transportation bill can begin.

                          ____________________
```
#### Albert A. GRINNELL, Appellant, v. B. C. SCHRAM, as Receiver of First National Bank-Detroit, a Federal Banking Corporation, Appellee.

No. 8414.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 9, 1939.

Butzel, Eaman, Long, Gust & Bills, of Detroit, Mich., for appellant.

Nichols, Wood, Marx & Ginter, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellee.

Before HICKS and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On reading and filing the stipulation of the parties hereto, by their respective counsel, for dismissal of the appeal in the above entitled cause; and the court being advised in the premises, it is hereby ordered that the above entitled appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed with prejudice to appellant, but without cost to any party.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO ANNUAL REPORT OF

LANDRYS RESTAURANTS, INC.

I, Tilman J. Fertitta, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Landrys Restaurants, Inc.;
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 29,
2008



/s/ Tilman J. Fertitta Tilman J. Fertitta Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4803 

To clarify the treatment of State and local real property taxes paid in 

2017 and assessed for 2018. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2018 

Mr. LANCE (for himself, Mr. GOTTHEIMER, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. 

FRELINGHUYSEN, Mr. LOBIONDO, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. KING of New 

York, Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. FASO, and Mr. DONOVAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To clarify the treatment of State and local real property 

taxes paid in 2017 and assessed for 2018. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SALT Prepayment De5 ductibility Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4803 IH

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF STATE AND LOCAL REAL PROP2 ERTY TAXES PAID IN 2017 AND ASSESSED FOR 

3 2018. 

4 Amounts paid in calendar year 2017 with respect to 

5 real property taxes assessed for calendar year 2018 shall 

6 not fail to be treated for purposes of section 164 as paid 

7 or accrued within calendar year 2017. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6233]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Ms. LINDA T. SANCHEZ of California:
        H.R. 6476.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article One of the United States Constitution, section 8, 
     clause 18:
       The Congress shall have Power--To make all Laws which shall 
     be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the 
     foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this 
     Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in 
     any Department or Officer thereof
       or
       Article One of the United States Constitution, Section 8, 
     Clause 3:
       The Congress shall have Power--To regulate Commerce with 
     foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the 
     Indian tribes;
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 28, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                          16,404
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      857
<ALLOWANCES>                                       299
<INVENTORY>                                     15,464
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,601
<PP&E>                                          43,864
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,128
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,057
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,669
<BONDS>                                            971
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,776
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,057
<SALES>                                        192,493
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               192,493
<CGS>                                          130,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  130,957
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                66,092
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   252
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 904
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,460
<INCOME-TAX>                                       977
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,483
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,483
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.92
        

</TABLE>
# Oconee - Appalachian Regional Commission

- South Carolina Appalachian Council of Governments Executive Director Steve Pelissier Email &#160;&#x69;n&#x66;&#111;&#x40;&#115;c&#x61;c&#x6f;&#103;&#x2e;&#111;r&#x67;The post South Carolina Appalachian Council of Governments appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4922 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to list fentanyl analogues as schedule 

I controlled substances. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2018 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee 

on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to list fentanyl 

analogues as schedule I controlled substances. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stopping Overdoses 

5 of Fentanyl Analogues Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FENTANYL ANALOGUES. 

7 Section 202(c) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

8 U.S.C. 812) is amended— 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4922 IH

1 (a) by adding at the end of subsection (b) of Schedule 

2 I the following: 

3 ‘‘(23) Acetyl fentanyl 4-methylphenethyl. 

4 ‘‘(24) Acrylfentanyl. 

5 ‘‘(25) 4-fluorobutyrylfentanyl. 

6 ‘‘(26) 4-fluoroisobutyryl fentanyl. 

7 ‘‘(27) 3-furanyl fentanyl. 

8 ‘‘(28) Isobutyryl fentanyl. 

9 ‘‘(29) Meta-fluorofentanyl. 

10 ‘‘(30) Methoxyacetyl fentanyl. 

11 ‘‘(31) 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl. 

12 ‘‘(32) Ocfentanil. 

13 ‘‘(33) Ortho-fluorofentanyl. 

14 ‘‘(34) Tetrahydrofuranyl fentanyl. 

15 ‘‘(35) Valeryl fentanyl.’’; and 

16 (b) by adding at the end of Schedule I the following: 

17 ‘‘(e)(1) Unless specifically exempted or unless listed 

18 in another schedule, any material, compound, mixture, or 

19 preparation which contains any quantity of fentanyl ana20 logues, or which contains their salts, isomers, and salts 

21 of isomers whenever the existence of such salts, isomers, 

22 and salts of isomers is possible within the specific chemical 

23 designation. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4922 IH

1 ‘‘(2) In paragraph (1), the term ‘fentanyl analogues’ 

2 includes any compound structurally derived from 

3 fentanyl— 

4 ‘‘(A) by replacement of the phenyl portion of 

5 the phenethyl group by any monocycle, whether or 

6 not further substituted in or on the monocycle; 

7 ‘‘(B) by substitution in or on the phenethyl 

8 group with alkyl, alkenyl, alkoxy, hydroxy, halo, 

9 haloalkyl, amino or nitro groups; 

10 ‘‘(C) by substitution in or on the piperidine ring 

11 with alkyl, alkenyl, alkoxy, ester, ether, hydroxy, 

12 halo, haloalkyl, amino or nitro groups; 

13 ‘‘(D) by replacement of the aniline ring with 

14 any aromatic monocycle whether or not further sub15 stituted in or on the aromatic monocycle; or 

16 ‘‘(E) by replacement of the N-propionyl group 

17 by another acyl group.’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely forthe purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned ChiefExecutive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies (the “Company”), herebycertifies, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Ricardo Salas                                    |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Ricardo Salas, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| March 16, 2006                                       |

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00150

- CR

Antonio GARCIA

- VERA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR10713

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED April 9, 2014.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7501** 

KEITH TYRONE TROXLER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. BRIAN WELLS , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Thomas D. Schroeder , District Judge. ( 1:14

- cv - 00592

- TDS

- JEP )

Submitted : January 29, 2016 Decided: February 16, 2016

Before KING, AGEE, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Keith Tyrone Troxler, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Keith Tyrone Troxler seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U. S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies t his standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S.

a t 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Troxler has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with ora l argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Michigan Supreme 

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 5, 2015

Order 

May 5, 2015

151460 & (12)

GREGORY HALLIWILL,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

ROBIN LEVONDOSKY,

Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 151460

COA: 324640

Ingham CC: 13-000925-CK

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation to dismiss the application for leave to 

appeal is GRANTED. The dismissal is with prejudice and without costs to either party.