alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1521]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          RECOGNIZING THE TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION ACADEMY

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. ADAM SMITH

                             of washington

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 13, 2012

  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I rise to honor the Technology 
Access Foundation (TAF) Academy, located in Kent, Washington and part 
of the Federal Way Public Schools, for winning the Schools of 
Distinction award for being the top middle school in mathematics 
instruction.
  Each year, the Intel Corporation honors elementary, middle and high 
schools from across the country for excellence in math and science 
education. Award winners in the math and science categories for each 
level receive $10,000 to support efforts to remain at the cutting edge 
of preparing students for careers in the 21st century.
  The TAF Academy opened in 2008 as a unique partnership between the 
Federal Way Public Schools and the Technology Access Foundation. It is 
a public middle and high school that receives additional support from 
the Technology Access Foundation to give students topnotch education in 
science, technology, engineering, and math. Students take rigorous 
classes that prepare them for college and eventually careers in the 
ever-changing and increasingly competitive global job market.
  Mr. Speaker, it is with great honor that I recognize the hard work of 
students, teachers, parents, and administrators of the Technology 
Access Foundation Academy. The academy's focus on science, technology, 
engineering and math will be greatly beneficial to its students and to 
our country.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32.1


KERR-McGEE CORPORATION
Kerr-McGee Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73125


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


I, Luke R. Corbett,  the Chief Executive Officer of Kerr-McGee  Corporation (the
"Issuer"),  in compliance  with 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify in connection with
the Issuer's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period that ended September
30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the "Report")
that:

     o the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the
       Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     o information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
       respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of  operations  of the
       Issuer.


/s/ Luke R. Corbett
----------------------

Luke R. Corbett
Chief Executive Officer
November 11, 2003





<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 32.2


KERR-McGEE CORPORATION
Kerr-McGee Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73125


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


I, Robert M. Wohleber,  the Chief  Financial  Officer of Kerr-McGee  Corporation
(the "Issuer"),  in compliance with 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, hereby certify in connection
with the  Issuer's  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-Q for the  period  that  ended
September 30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report") that:

     o the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the
       Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     o information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
       respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of  operations  of the
       Issuer.


/s/ Robert M. Wohleber
----------------------

Robert M. Wohleber
Chief Financial Officer
November 11, 2003
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Tucows Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Cooperman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify to my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date: March 22, 2011

/s/ MICHAEL COOPERMAN Michael Cooperman Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          24,576
<SECURITIES>                                    31,149
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,513
<ALLOWANCES>                                       469
<INVENTORY>                                     22,522
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,161
<PP&E>                                          10,883
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,481
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,395
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   105,326
<SALES>                                        106,173
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               107,224
<CGS>                                           56,223
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,469
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (2,118)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,238
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,182
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,056
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,056
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4797 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to prohibit the extension or establishment of national monuments in Arizona except by express authorization 

of Congress, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2018 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself and Mr. GOSAR) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to prohibit the extension or establishment of national monuments in Arizona 

except by express authorization of Congress, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON EXTENSION OR ESTABLISH4 MENT OF NATIONAL MONUMENTS IN ARI5 ZONA. 

6 Subsection (d) of section 320301 of title 54, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4797 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘OR ARIZONA’’ after ‘‘WYO2 MING’’; and 

3 (2) by inserting ‘‘or Arizona’’ after ‘‘Wyoming’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
Order entered November 14, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01206
- CR JOSEPH NEWMAN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F18
- 30564
- L



### O RDER This appeal is REINSTATED

. By order entered October 17 , 2018, the Court deferred ruling on appellant’s October 12, 2018 pro se motions to withdraw his guilty plea and for “ free process” to proceed as an indigent on appeal. Because it was unclear whether appellant had been designated as an indigent allowed to proceed on appeal without costs and whether the trial court had appointed counsel to represent appellant on appeal, t he Court abated this appeal to allow the trial court to make these determinations and to allow the trial court to prepare a certification of the right to appeal. The Court has received documents showing that on November 5, 2018, the trial court determined appellant was indigent and appointed April Smith as counsel on appeal. Among the– 2

–

documents received is a certification of the right to appeal certifying that this is a plea

- bargain

case and appellant has no right to appeal. Accordingly, the Court VACATES its October 17 , 2018 order. Because appellant is represented by counsel and is not entitled to hybrid representation, the Court DENIES appellant’s October 12, 2018 pro se motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Because the trial court has determined appellant is indigent, the Court DENIES AS MOOT appellant’s October 12, 2018 motion for free process.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, theundersigned Chief Financial Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009,(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Tony Chung                       |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Tony Chung, Chief  Financial Officer |   |
| May 20, 2009                    |   |

 

----
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000402

30-JUL-2018

08:42 AM
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5923]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. REED:
       H.R. 6387.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 as well as Article I, 
     Section 8, Clause 18

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,376,532
<SECURITIES>                                13,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,687,737
<PP&E>                                       1,657,883
<DEPRECIATION>                                 866,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,366,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,513,904
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    49,619,784
<OTHER-SE>                                (38,208,649)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,366,349
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               258,811
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,830,736
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,010,664
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,855,646)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,855,646)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.67)


</TABLE>
# C_2021490EN.01002801.xml

| 6.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 490/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Ukrselhosprom PCF and Versobank v ECB

(Joined Cases T-351/18 and T-584/18) (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB - Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation - Breach of legislation on combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism - Admissibility - Powers of the national competent authorities (NCAs) of participating Member States and of the ECB under the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Protection of legitimate expectations - Legal certainty - Misuse of powers - Rights of the defence - Obligation to state reasons)

(2021/C 490/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Ukrselhosprom PCF LLC (Solone, Ukraine), Versobank AS (Tallinn, Estonia) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: C. Hernández Saseta and G. Marafioti, acting as Agents, and by B. Schneider, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė, D. Triantafyllou and A. Nijenhuis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of decision ECB_SSM_2018_EE_1 WHD_2017 0012 of the ECB of 26 March 2018, secondly, of decision ECB_SSM_2018_EE_2 WHD_2017 0012 of 17 July 2018, replacing decision ECB_SSM_2018_EE_1 WHD_2017 0012, by which the ECB withdrew Versobank’s authorisation to operate as a credit institution, and, thirdly, of decision ECB/SSM/2018 EE 3 of 14 August 2018 on the costs relating to the review procedure.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders that Cases T-351/18 and T-584/18 be joined for the purposes of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders that Cases T-351/18 and T-584/18 be joined for the purposes of the judgment;

| 2. | Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in Case T-351/18; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in Case T-351/18;

| 3. | Dismisses the action in Case T-584/18; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action in Case T-584/18;

| 4. | Orders Ukrselhosprom PCF LLC, Versobank AS, the European Central Bank (ECB) and the European Commission each to bear their own costs in Case T-351/18; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Ukrselhosprom PCF LLC, Versobank AS, the European Central Bank (ECB) and the European Commission each to bear their own costs in Case T-351/18;

| 5. | Orders Ukrselhosprom PCF and Versobank, in Case T-584/18, to bear their own costs and to pay those of the ECB; |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders Ukrselhosprom PCF and Versobank, in Case T-584/18, to bear their own costs and to pay those of the ECB;

| 6. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs in Case T-584/18. |
| --- | --- |

6.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs in Case T-584/18.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.

---
Clean AirCounal 

octcET ID'. EPfl-IAR- O ~~ -2 ~13 

Comments of 

Coryn Wolk 

Clean Air Council 

Re: EPA's Proposed Carbon Emissions Guidefines for Existing Stationary Sources: ECectric Utitity 

Generating Unifis 

My name is Coryn Wolk and I represent Clean Air Council, a Pennsylvania nonprofit 

organization headcluartered in ~that advocates for everyone's right to breathe clean air. 

The Council has serious concerns about EPA's proposed Carbon Rute. It is vital that EPA fznally 

take concrete, enforceable steps towards restricting carbon emissions and slowi.ng climate 

change. However, while the Carbon Rule would indeed restrict carbon emissions, it pushes 

inereased natural gas driIling as a viable alternative to burning coal. 

Climate Impacts of Natural Gas Drilling and Use: 

There are numerous issues with this, but I'11 start with the climate impacts. According to EPA's 

figures, at 3.2% leakage of inethane, natural gas ceases to be better for the climate than coal. 

Estimates of inethane leakage rates vary widely, but a recent study by Howarth et al at Cornell 

University found that their own previous estimate of 3.3% methane leakage was reasonable but 

probably low. 

So already, using conservative estimates, switching to natural gas from coal provides no 

advantages in fighting climate change. However, the reality is even less positive. 

The figures currently tised by EPA put methane at 21 times the global warming potential of 

carbon dioxide over a 100-year tirnespan. Elowever, the most recent IPCC report estimated that 

methane's global warming potential is actually 34 times that of carbon dioxide in the I00-year 

time frame. EPA lias had plenty of time to update its science, as even the previous IPCC report 

put methane's GWP at 25. One wonders when EPA will choose to update the figures on which 

they base such crucial calculations. 

Furthermore, given that the next few decades are critical for stopping clirnate change's 

rnomentum, the shorter timeframe is more relevant in choosing a course of action. The IPCC 

says that there is no scientiftc argument for preferring a I00-year measurement. In the 20-year 

tiineframe, according to the IPCC, methane has 86 times the global warming potential of carbon 

dioxide. 

Phi#adetphid 135 ;. lr)tif SfreO Si.iiie 300 ' Philade!nhia. PA 191 103 ' 215-567-4004 .=tix 217:567 5741 :v.vw.clear:air.org 

h9arrisburg 1011 N.i-ranP5lre0 ° Suite113 " f1arrisb;iret,P.4 17101 ' 717•2330-?t8?6 - Fex717-?3Q 8808 vr~•:v,fa:ebuok.tcrr:;:ienaircevnci'= 

WilmingtQn 1OGW. 1t71h 5ree1 ` Sui)s607 `rviirnington, DE 198,01 ! 302-69 1 {7112 ws,~ . vitlecccmiclec^~:it~ouncil 
Clean Air Council believes that decisive EPA action oji climate change, namely limiting 

greenhouse gas emissioiis, is essential. However, the proposed rule does not constitute that. I-TA 

needs to use its authority to create--and enforce—regulations that will actually bi-iiig us closer to 

solving the climate crisis.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00233-CV 

IN INTEREST OF S.G., A CHILD

------------

FROM THE 323RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 323-98141J-13

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss.” It is the court’s 

opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 14, 2014

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5710]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. McDERMOTT:
        H.R. 6338.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Clause 1 of Section 8 of Article 1 of the United States 
     Constitution
```
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00936-CV

JOEL D. MALLORY, JR., Appellant

V.

WEST BELLFORT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, Appellee

Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County 

(Tr. Ct. No. 1039665).

After due consideration, the Court grants the motion to dismiss the appeal filed by 

the appellee. Accordingly, the Court dismisses the appeal.

The Court orders that costs be taxed against appellant.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered July 9, 2015.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Chief Justice Radack and Justices

Higley and Massengale.y
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**AFFINITYGROUP, INC.**

 

**STATEMENTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

 

I, Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer of Affinity Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify as follows:

 

1.                                       This statementis provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the “PeriodicReport”);

 

2.                                       The PeriodicReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.                                       The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the datesand for the periods indicated therein.

 

 
| Date: March 4, 2005 |                       |
|---------------------|----------------------------|
|                |                       |
|                | /s/ Thomas F. Wolfe        |
|                | Thomas F. Wolfe            |
|                | Senior  Vice President and |
|                | Chief  Financial Officer   |

 

 

 

 

 

----