alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

April 23, 2010

Ms. Joyce E. Epps, Director

Bureau of Air Quality

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

Rachel Carson State Office Building

P.O. Box 2063

Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063

Dear Ms. Epps:

On April 14, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision 

to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department of 

Environmental Protection (PADEP). This SIP revision pertains to the attainment demonstration 

for the 1997 fine particulate (PM2.5) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for the 

Pennsylvania portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE PM2.5 nonattainment area. 

EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is 

reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Rose Quinto, Office 

of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-2182. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

Sincerely, 

 /s/

 David L. Arnold, Acting Director

 Air Protection Division 

cc: Arlene Shulman, PADEP
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

K-Belle Consultants, LLC ) ASBCA No. 62587

)

Under Contract Nos. W912P8-16-B-0038 )

W912P8-16-C-0051 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Michael H. Payne, Esq.

 Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman PC

 Philadelphia, PA

Casey J. McKinnon, Esq.

 Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman PC

 Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

 Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Thomas M. Taff, Jr., Esq.

 Engineer Trial Attorney

 U.S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: November 13, 2020

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62587, Appeal of K-Belle 

Consultants, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: November 13, 2020

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5633]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 PRAYER

  Imam Nayyar Imam, Suffolk County Police Department, Yaphank, New 
York, offered the following prayer:
  We beseech God Almighty, calling upon Him by the most noble of His 
characteristics. We bear witness in testimony that He is the sovereign, 
the omnipotent, the exalted, the all knowing.
  God Almighty, we ask that You bestow upon all of our elected 
officials guidance and patience required to carry out the solemn task 
of legislation before them. Grant them commitment to serve before being 
served, a sense of fraternity before partisanship, and dedication to 
the interests of our country before the interests of even their own 
selves.
  The final prophet of God, Muhammad, peace be upon him, stated:

       The leaders of a people are a representation of their 
     deeds.

  We ask God Almighty that He make our elected officials true 
representatives of honesty, equality, and the values that represent the 
uniqueness of our Nation.
  We ask You, Almighty God, that You look to us with glance of mercy, 
regardless of gender, ethnicity, religion, or political party. Amen.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,  for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  in  his  capacity  as an  officer  of  the  BFA  Liquidation  Trust  (the
"COMPANY"), that, to his knowledge:

                  (a)      the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
                           the fiscal  quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
                           the   Securities   and   Exchange   Commission   (the
                           "REPORT"),  fully complies with the  requirements  of
                           Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                           and

                  (b)      the  information   contained  in  the  Report  fairly
                           presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date: August 13, 2003                  By:      /s/ Clifton R. Jessup, Jr.
                                                --------------------------
                                       Name:    Clifton R. Jessup, Jr.
                                       Title:   Liquidating Trustee

Date: August 13, 2003                  By:      /s/ Mark A. Roberts
                                                -------------------
                                       Name:    Mark A. Roberts
                                       Title:    Assistant to the Liquidating
                                                 Trustee

This certification is not deemed to be "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise  subject to the liability of that
section.  This  certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

                                       18
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2012

- NM

- 0 79

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
mm01-0912_8ke101.htm




Exhibit 10.1


Information Concerning Executive Compensation







It has been the policy of Leucadia National Corporation (the “Company”) since the current management took over in 1978 to emphasize performance based compensation through the payment of discretionary bonuses.







On January 9, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee in consultation with Ian M. Cumming, Chairman of the Board, and Joseph S. Steinberg, President of the Company, approved annual salary increases (effective January 1, 2012) and discretionary 2011 cash bonuses for each of the Company’s executive officers who were included as named executive officers in the Company’s 2011 proxy statement (other than Mr. Cumming and Mr. Steinberg1 ).













	
Name

	
Base Salary in 2012

	
Bonus Award for 20112


	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	
Thomas E. Mara

	
$380,000

	
$  761,130


	  	  	  
	
Joseph A. Orlando

	
$346,000

	
$1,010,140


	  	  	  
	
Justin R. Wheeler

	
$314,000

	
$1,849,180














 


 


____________________________________________ 



1 Consistent with past practice, bonuses for 2011 for Messrs. Cumming and Steinberg will be considered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors at the Board of Directors meeting to be held following the Company’s 2012 annual meeting of shareholders.  





2 Includes an annual holiday bonus paid to all employees based on a percentage of salary of $11,130 for Mr. Mara, $10,140 for Mr. Orlando and $9,180 for Mr. Wheeler.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-11032 Summary Calendar

ARTHUR F. WEPPNER, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus U.S. PAROLE COMM’N, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(4:95-CV-546-A)

- - - - - - - - - - July 1, 1996 Before JOHNSON, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Arthur F. Weppner appeals the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Weppner contends: that mandatory releasees are different from parolees for purposes of revocation of “street time”; that the Parole Commission may not forfeit “street time” earned by a mandatory releasee; that the Parole Commission impermissibly lengthened his sentence in violation of Article III of the Constitution when itNo. 95-11032 - 2 -forfeited his “street time”; and that his Missouri carelessdriving offense was not the type of offense on which the Parole Commission could base the revocation of “street time.” We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and we find no reversible error regarding whether the Parole Commission could forfeit a mandatory releasee’s “street time.” Accordingly, we affirm the judgment on those contentions essentially for the reasons provided by the district court. See Weppner v. USPC , No. 4:95-CV-546-A (N.D. Tex. Sep. 28, 1995). We review Weppner’s contentions, raised for the first time on appeal, that the Parole Commission violated Article III and that his offense was not the type allowing for forfeiture of his “street time” for plain error. See Highlands Ins. Co. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. , 27 F.3d 1027, 1032 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 903 (1995). The Commission did not extend Weppner’s sentence; rather, the Commission forfeited his street time, as it was entitled to do. Munguia v. USPC , 871 F.2d 517, 521 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 493 U.S. 856 (1989). Weppner’s admission that his careless-driving offense carried a maximum 90-day jail term dooms his contention that his offense was not of the type allowing for forfeiture. The statutory scheme contemplates forfeiture of street time for any offense punishable by imprisonment. Id
. AFFIRMED.
| (1)   | The              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)              of              the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material              respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the              Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                       |                                       |                                                                  |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                       |                                       |
|                                                  |                                  |                                                             |
| Dated:   May                  9, 2006  | By:                              | /s/    *PATRICK                    SCHNEGELSBERG* |
|                                                       | Patrick                  Schnegelsberg,    |
|                                                       | Chief                    Executive Officer |
## Docket Number FAA **- 2012**  **- 0638** 

**Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  11/29/11 **Regional Airline Association** 11 /29/11 **Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  11/29/11 **ATA M. Lopez**  11/29/11
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,953
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      109
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   109
<PP&E>                                           1,779
<DEPRECIATION>                                     719
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,179
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,554
<COMMON>                                           102
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,604)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,231
<SALES>                                            485
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   485
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,014
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,193)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.43)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.12


EXPERT CONSENT
 The undersigned hereby consents to (i) the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled “Prairie Creek Property Northwest Territories, Canada Technical Report for Canadian Zinc Corporation” with an effective date of June 15, 2012 and other mineral resource and reserve information pertaining to the Prairie Creek Property in the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) for the year ended December 31, 2013 of Canadian Zinc Corporation (the “Company”) and in the Management Discussion & Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2013 of the Company (the “MD&A), and (ii) the use of the name, AMC Mining Consultants Ltd., in the AIF, the MD&A and the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto incorporating by reference the Company’s AIF, and MD&A.
 Dated this 20thday of March, 2014.
 AMC Mining Consultants Ltd.
 /s/ AMC Mining Consultants Ltd.
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 (the “Report”) of MCG Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Beverly Jane Alley, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:


|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/ BEVERLY JANE ALLEYName:Beverly Jane AlleyTitle:Chief Financial OfficerDateOctober 29, 2014
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5900]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                PROGRAM

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, there will be two rollcall votes tomorrow at 
11 a.m. The first will be a cloture vote on the cyber security bill. 
The second will be on the Coburn amendment to the Burma sanctions 
legislation. Additional votes are possible tomorrow. Senators will be 
notified as soon as we know.

                          ____________________
```
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 12, 2021 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-00419-CV

IN THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF T.W.
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. M-12100

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Schenck The parties have filed a joint motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1. We GRANT the motion and DISMISS the appeal. See id.

210419F.P05 /David J. Schenck / DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

IN THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF T.W.

No. 05-21-00419-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. M-12100. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck. Justices Reichek and Carlyle participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.
It is ORDERED that each party bear their own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 12th day of July 2021.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Gammacan International Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Tovi Ben Zeev, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


Date:  May 9, 2005                                      By: /s/ TOVI BEN ZEEV
                                                           ---------------------
                                                        Tovi Ben Zeev
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
ex10_2.htm










THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

















This Thirteenth Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of November 18, 2011 by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Employer") and William Naylon ("Executive").












Recitals








	
A)  

	
On January 16, 2002 an Employment Agreement ("Agreement") was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive.













	
B)  

	
Said Employment Agreement has been amended on twelve prior occasions;













	
C)  

	
Employer and Executive now desire to further amend the Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow:

















Agreement








	
1.  

	
Section 2.1 of the Agreement which provides:













	
  

	
2.1

	
Salary.  For Executive's services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $297,138 during each year of the Employment Term.  Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer's normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine.







 


is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2012, to provide as follows:








	
2.1  

	
Salary.  For Executive's services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $400,000 during each year of the Employment Term.  Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer's normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine.









 



	
2.  

	
Section 3.1 of the Agreement which provides:













	
  

	
3.1

	
Term. The term of Executive’s employment hereunder shall commence on January 16, 2002 and shall continue until January 31, 2012 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided.












is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2012, to provide as follows:








	
3.1  

	
Term.  The term of Executive’s employment hereunder shall commence on January 16, 2002 and shall continue until January 31, 2013 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided.













	
3.  

	
All other terms of the Agreement, as amended, shall remain unaltered and fully effective.









 


Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.






















EXECUTIVE                                                                                                EMPLOYER


PRICESMART, INC.







William Naylon                                                                           By:           







______________________                                                          Name:        Jose Luis Laparte 







Its:           CEO and President
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6458]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      By Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself and Mr. Blumenthal):
  S. 3556. A bill to provide penalties for email marketing fraud; to 
the Committee on the Judiciary.

                          ____________________
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. STERN-SLEGMAN-PRINS COMPANY.

No. 11507.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

May 31, 1939.

Richard K. Phelps, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Kansas City, Mo.

No appearance entered for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal docketed and dismissed without costs to either party in this court, on motion of counsel for appellant