alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Regional Administrato r Region 9, Arizona, California

Environmental Protection 75 Hawthorne Street Hawaii, Nevada, Guam

Agency San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 American Samoa,

Northern Marianas Islands

For Immediate Release: February 11, 2011

Contact: Margot Perez-Sullivan, (415) 947-4149, perezsullivan.margot@epa.gov

EPA’s new proposal to Four Corners Pow er Plant cuts more NOx emissions, protects health, saves jobs Arizona Public Service lauded for savi ng Native American jobs, environment

SAN FRANCISCO – Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced a supplemental proposal to reduce emissions from the Four Corners Power Plant. The new proposal will reduce nitrogen oxides (NOx) emis sions from approximately 45,000 tons per year to 5,800 tons per year, 3,200 tons less than EPA’s in itial proposal. The proposal will also work to protect public health in the area by ensuring re sidents have cleaner air with fewer harmful pollutants.

Today’s action follows EPA’s initia l October proposal to require po llution controls at the Four Corners Power Plant. In response to that pr oposal, Arizona Public Service put forward an alternative requiring plant operators to install Selective Catalytic Reduc tion (SCR) on two of the

five coal-fired boilers and shut down the three older ones. SCR is the most stringent pollution control technology available fo r this type of facility.

“The new proposal controls emissions better, whil e costing less and preser ving jobs”, said Jared Blumenfeld, EPA’s Regional Administrator for the Pacific Southwest. “This plant is the nation’s largest source of nitrogen oxides. By reducing its emissions by 87% - rather than our initial proposal of 80% - we will all be able to see the results and br eathe cleaner, healthier air.”

Four Corners Power Plant and the Navajo Mi ne which supplies its coal, employ roughly 1000 people, 75% of whom are Native American. Both facilities have pledged “No Layoffs” if Units

1-3 are closed.

Today’s proposal would reduce vi sibility impact from Four Co rners Power Plant by an average 72% at the national parks and wilderness areas. Every year over 280 million people visit our nation’s most treasured parks and wilderness areas. Yet, many visitors aren’t able to see the spectacular vistas because of the veil of white or brown haze that hangs in the air, reducing visibility and dulling th e natural beauty.

EPA is requesting comment on today’s proposal in addition to the October 2010 proposal by May 2, 2011. Members of the public in the Four Corners area will have four opportunities to attend open houses and public hearings during the week of March 28, 2011. For additional information on the proposed rulemaking and oppor tunities to provide i nput, please go to: http://www.epa.gov/region9/air/navajo/
Summary of Director Compensation






Summary of Director Compensation

(as of January 28, 2005)




Directors of Dollar General Corporation receive a $6,250 quarterly retainer plus $1,250 for each Board or committee meeting attended and $625 for each telephonic Board or committee meeting attended. Committee chairpersons and the presiding director receive an additional quarterly retainer of $1,250. A director who also is a Dollar General employee does not receive any separate compensation for Board service.  Directors also receive reimbursement for fees and expenses incurred in connection with continuing education seminars and travel expenses related to meeting attendance or company-requested appearances. 




In addition, a director who is not a Dollar General employee is entitled to receive an annual grant of 4,600 restricted stock units (6,000 restricted stock units in the case of a non-employee Chairman) pursuant to our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. The restricted stock units generally vest on the first anniversary of the grant date, if the director is still serving as a director on that date, subject to accelerated vesting provisions as provided in the Plan; however, no common stock may be distributed, nor any amount paid, to any director in respect of restricted stock units until the director has ceased to be a member of the Board.  Dividend equivalents on the restricted stock units are credited to the director’s restricted stock unit account in accordance with the terms of the Plan.
1The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-1026

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for 

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Berisfold Smith, also known as Clyde *

Brown, also known as Clive Brown, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: February 25, 2000

 Filed: March 3, 2000

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Following his conditional guilty plea to a drug charge, Berisfold Smith appeals

the District Court’s1 denial of his motion to suppress evidence. The evidence was

obtained after police subjected Smith and two other men to an investigative stop after

partially corroborating an anonymous tip that the three men were removing bundles

from the door panels of a car, concealing them in a coat, and taking them inside an

apartment building. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude
-2-

the District Court’s denial of Smith’s suppression motion was supported by substantial

evidence and was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Delaney, 52 F.3d 182,

186 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 878 (1995).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6541-S6542]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         MESSAGE FROM THE HOUSE

  At 9:48 a.m., a message from the House of Representatives, delivered 
by Mrs. Cole, one of its reading clerks, announced that the House has 
passed the following bills, in which it requests the concurrence of the 
Senate:

       H.R. 733. An act to provide for scientific frameworks with 
     respect to recalcitrant cancers.
       H.R. 1461. An act to authorize the Mescalero Apache Tribe 
     to lease adjudicated water rights.
       H.R. 3319. An act to allow the Pascua Yaqui Tribe to 
     determine the requirements for membership in that tribe.
       H.R. 3783. An act to provide for a comprehensive strategy 
     to counter Iran's growing hostile presence and activity in 
     the Western Hemisphere, and for other purposes.
       H.R. 4158. An act to confirm full ownership rights for 
     certain United States astronauts to artifacts from the 
     astronauts' space missions.

[[Page S6542]]

       H.R. 6060. An act to amend Public Law 106-392 to maintain 
     annual base funding for the Upper Colorado and San Juan fish 
     recovery programs through fiscal year 2019.
       H.R. 6118. An act to amend section 353 of the Public Health 
     Service Act with respect to suspensions, revocation, and 
     limitation of laboratory certification.
       H.R. 6433. An act to make corrections with respect to Food 
     and Drug Administration user fees.

                          ____________________
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 1107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID SPF Macaque Breeding 
Colonies.
    Date: February 7, 2024.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G53, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Konrad Krzewski, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G53, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-747-7526, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#305b5f5e4251541e5b424a5547435b59705e59581e575f46"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="294246475b484d07425b534c5e5a424069474041074e465f">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 3, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-00201 Filed 1-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 480 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow qualified scholarship 

funding corporations to access tax-exempt financing for alternative private student loans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2017 

Mr. FLORES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow qualified scholarship funding corporations to access tax-exempt financing for alternative private student loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Loan Oppor5 tunity Act of 2017’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 480 IH

1 SEC. 2. QUALIFIED SCHOLARSHIP FUNDING CORPORATION 

2 TAX-EXEMPT FINANCING FOR ALTERNATIVE 

3 PRIVATE STUDENT LOANS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 150(d)(2)(A) of the Inter5 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘established and’’, 

7 (2) by striking ‘‘incurred under the Higher 

8 Education Act of 1965’’, and 

9 (3) by inserting ‘‘and performing student assist10 ance related activities’’ after ‘‘student loan notes’’. 

11 (b) STUDENT ASSISTANCE RELATED ACTIVITIES.— 

12 Section 150(d) of such Code is amended by adding at the 

13 end the following new paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(4) STUDENT ASSISTANCE RELATED ACTIVI15 TIES.—For purposes of this subsection, the term 

16 ‘student assistance related activities’ includes main17 taining loan documentation, handling communica18 tions with schools and borrowers, monitoring the 

19 student borrower’s location and continued enroll20 ment, default prevention, offering borrower edu21 cation and college access programs, borrower out22 reach and financial literacy training, disseminating 

23 information about student loan programs and higher 

24 education finance matters, and similar charitable 

25 and educational activities.’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 480 IH

1 (c) REQUALIFICATION AS QUALIFIED SCHOLARSHIP

2 FUNDING CORPORATION.—Section 150(d) of such Code, 

3 as amended by subsection (b), is amended by adding at 

4 the end the following new paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(5) REQUALIFICATION AS QUALIFIED SCHOL6 ARSHIP FUNDING CORPORATION.—A corporation 

7 that meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A) 

8 and (B) of section 150(d)(2) shall not fail to be 

9 treated as a qualified scholarship funding corpora10 tion solely because such corporation ceased to be a 

11 corporation described in section 150(d)(2) after the 

12 date of the enactment of the Health Care and Edu13 cation Reconciliation Act of 2010.’’. 

14 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to bonds issued after the date of 

16 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.1

                          HANOVER COMPRESSOR COMPANY

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                            (Amounts in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Year Ended December 31,
                                                          -----------------------------------------
                                                            1999     1998    1997    1996    1995
                                                          -------  -------  ------- ------- -------
<S>                                                       <C>      <C>      <C>     <C>     <C>
Earnings:................................................
Pretax income from continuing operations................. $60,463  $49,636  $28,685 $16,953 $ 8,099

Add:
Interest on indebtedness and amortization of debt expense
  and discount (1).......................................   9,115   11,716   10,728   6,594   4,560
Interest component of rent expense.......................  22,486    6,310      113     132     100
Equity in losses of joint ventures.......................  (1,188)  (1,369)      --      --      --
                                                          -------  -------  ------- ------- -------
   Earnings as adjusted..................................  90,876   66,293   39,526  23,679  12,759
                                                          -------  -------  ------- ------- -------

Fixed charges:
Interest on indebtedness and amortization of debt expense
  and discount (1).......................................  10,597   11,716   10,728   6,594   4,560
Interest component of rent expense.......................  22,486    6,310      113     132     100
                                                          -------  -------  ------- ------- -------
   Fixed charges.........................................  33,083   18,026   10,841   6,726   4,660
                                                          -------  -------  ------- ------- -------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.......................    2.75     3.68     3.65    3.52    2.74
                                                          =======  =======  ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>

(1) Includes distributions on mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred
    securities.
**Exhibit
      32.1**








KERR-McGEE
      CORPORATION


123
      Robert S. Kerr Avenue


Oklahoma
      City, Oklahoma 73102








**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**REGARDING
      PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING**


**FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS**








I,
      Luke R. Corbett, the Chief Executive Officer of Kerr-McGee Corporation, in
      compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify in connection with the
      registrant’s report on Form 10-Q for the period that ended March 31, 2006 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") that:





|· | the
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
              Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|· | information
              contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
              the
              financial condition and results of operations of the
              Issuer.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







/s/
      Luke R. Corbett


______________________





Luke
      R. Corbett


Chief
      Executive Officer


May
      10, 2006
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6241]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The Honorable Kirsten E. Gillibrand led the Pledge of Allegiance, as 
follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of 
     America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation 
     under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

                          ____________________
```
#### John JACKSON, Jr., Petitioner, v. R. R. RAINES, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Respondent

No. A-12898.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 21, 1960.

*1014John Jackson, Jr., petitioner, pro se.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Lewis A. Wallace, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

POWELL, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner, John Jackson, Jr., No. 63183, is presently incarcerated in the State Penitentiary at McAlester by reason of a plea of guilty entered in the district court of Kingfisher County, Oklahoma, on a charge of attempted burglary, second degree.. He was sentenced to eighteen months imprisonment.

Petitioner complains of a hold order placed by the officials of Garfield County with the officials of the State Penitentiary at McAlester. He alleges that the evidence obtained against him in Garfield County was obtained illegally; that his 'car was searched without aid of a search war- . rant,. and “what has been called stolen property was found”-. He seeks an order ,, directed to the district- court of Garfield-County ordering the case dismissed. We . assume, therefore, from the petition, that the case is pending in the district court of . Garfield County. If this is true, petitioner would be entitled to a speedy trial. McLeod v. Graham, 6 Okl.Cr. 197, 118 P. 160; State ex rel. Sims v. Caruthers, 1 Okl.Cr. 428, 98 P. 474; Davidson v. State, 82 Okl.Cr. 402, 171 P.2d 640. But he does not ask that, or set out whether actually he has been bound over for trial, or even arrested on the Garfield County case. We do infer that a grand larceny case is pending, either in the court of an examining magistrate or in the district court of Garfield County, and petitioner wants such case dismissed because he says the evidence was obtained illegally. That is a matter to be brought up in the case below, and not here, except on appeal.

If the case is pending in the district court of Garfield County, petitioner on proper showing under our holdings in the above cited cases could obtain either a dismissal or a speedy trial, depending upon the facts, and raise the issue now attempted to be raised in an appeal to this Court.

As the matter now stands, under the allegations of the present petition, we are governed by Ex parte Matthews, 85 Okl.Cr. 173, 186 P.2d 840, 842, and other such cases, where it is said:

> “Where a prisoner in custody under sentence of conviction seeks to be discharged on habeas corpus, the inquiry is limited to the questions whether the court in which the prisoner was convicted had jurisdiction of the person of the defendant and of the crime charged, and did the court have jurisdiction to render the particular judgment.”

Petition denied.

NIX and. BRETT, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5925]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following 
communication from the Speaker:

                                               Washington, DC,

                                               September 13, 2012.
       I hereby appoint the Honorable Steve Austria to act as 
     Speaker pro tempore on this day.
                                                  John A. Boehner,
     Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4934 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4934

 To prohibit assistance to the Government of Pakistan, and to require 
the Department of State and the United States Agency for International 
Development to transfer amounts to the Highway Trust Fund equivalent to 
               historic levels of assistance to Pakistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2018

 Mr. Sanford introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit assistance to the Government of Pakistan, and to require 
the Department of State and the United States Agency for International 
Development to transfer amounts to the Highway Trust Fund equivalent to 
               historic levels of assistance to Pakistan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON ASSISTANCE TO PAKISTAN.

    No amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to the 
Department of State or the United States Agency for International 
Development may be made available as assistance to the Government of 
Pakistan.

SEC. 2. REQUIRED TRANSFERS TO THE HIGHWAY TRUST FUND.

    (a) Department of State.--Upon receipt of appropriations for the 
balance of fiscal year 2018, the Secretary of State shall transfer 
$1,280,000,000 to the Highway Trust Fund.
    (b) United States Agency for International Development.--Upon 
receipt of appropriations for the balance of fiscal year 2018, the 
Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development 
shall transfer $852,000,000 to the Highway Trust Fund.
                                 <all>
```
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. PEERLESS WHITE LIME CO.

No. 432 Orig.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

April 7, 1939.

Robert B. Watts, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Robert M. Hawes, of St. Louis, Mo., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent ordered to cease and desist from doing certain things and to take certain affirmative action, on petition for enforcement of order of Labor Board.