alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020313EN.01000601.xml

| 21.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/6

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 31 January 2020 — Association européenne du charbon et du lignite (Euracoal) v European Commission, Deutscher Braunkohlen-Industrie — Verein eV, Lausitz Energie Kraftwerke AG, Mitteldeutsche Braunkohlengesellschaft mbH, eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG

(Case C-172/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Environment - Directive 2010/75/EU - Best available techniques (BAT) conclusions - Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1442 - Large combustion plants - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility - Lack of direct concern - Participation in the process leading to the adoption of the act - Procedural guarantees at the time of the adoption of the act - Substitution of grounds - No grounds alleging infringement of the appellant’s procedural rights - Act not of individual concern - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

(2020/C 313/07)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Association européenne du charbon et du lignite (Euracoal) (represented by: W. Spieth and N. Hellermann, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: Deutscher Braunkohlen-Industrie — Verein eV, Lausitz Energie Kraftwerke AG, Mitteldeutsche Braunkohlengesellschaft mbH, eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: W. Spieth and N. Hellermann, Rechtsanwälte), European Commission (represented by: R. Tricot and A. C. Becker, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Association européenne du charbon et du lignite (Euracoal) shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Association européenne du charbon et du lignite (Euracoal) shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 164, 13.5.2019.

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6000]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. TIERNEY:
       H.R. 6407.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       The constitutional authority of Congress to enact this 
     legislation is provided by Article I, Section 8 of the United 
     States Constitution.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4421 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4421

 To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to vehicle weight 
                  limitations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2017

Mr. DeSaulnier (for himself, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Mr. DeFazio, 
 and Mr. Smucker) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to vehicle weight 
                  limitations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VEHICLE WEIGHT LIMITATIONS-INTERSTATE SYSTEM.

    Section 127 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(u) Electric Vehicles.--A vehicle, if propelled exclusively by 
means of electric battery power, may exceed any vehicle weight limit 
(up to a maximum gross vehicle weight of 82,000 pounds) under this 
section by an amount that is equal to the difference between--
            ``(1) the weight of the vehicle attributable to the 
        electric batteries and wiring system of the vehicle; and
            ``(2) the weight of a comparable diesel tank and fueling 
        system.''.
                                 <all>
```
San Joaquin Valley ~ rr 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT HEALTHY AlrR LIVINGm 

September 13, 2011 

Mr. Mike Guzzetta, Manager 

Rule Evaluations Section 

California Air Resources Board 

P.O. Box 2815 


Sacramento, CA 95812 


Dear Mr. Guzzetta: 

Attached is the Rule Action Package for Rule 4566 (Organic Material Composting 

Operations), which was adopted by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District 

Governing Board on August 18, 2011. We request that the California Air Resources 

Board (ARB) transmit Rule 4566 and the appropriate documentation to the United 

States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revision. 

Included with this Rule Action Package are the following attachments: 

1. ARB SIP Completeness Checklist 

2. ARB APCD/AQMD Rule Evaluation Form 

3. Clean Copy of Rule 4566 

4. Referenced Rules 

5. Evidence of Public Hearing 

6. Governing Board Resolution 

7. Governing Board Memo 

8. Staff Report with appendices, including Public Comments and District Responses. 

The Rule Action Package is being transmitted bye-mail to ARB staff. If you have any 

questions, please contact Koshoua Thao at (559) 230-5822 or bye-mail at 

koshoua.thao@valleyair.org. The District thanks you and your staff for your assistance. 

<~ Director of Strategies and Incentives 

Attachments 

Seyed Sadredin 

Executive Director/Air Pollution Control Officer 

Northern Region Central Region [Main Office) Southern Region 

4800 Enterprise Way 1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue 34946 Flyover Court 

Modesto. CA 95356·8718 Fresno. CA 93726·0244 Bakersfield. CA 93308·9725 

Tel: 1209) 557·6400 FAX: [209) 557·6475. Tel: [559) 230·6000 FAX: 1559) 230·6061 Tel: 661·392·5500 FAX: 661·392·5585 

www.valleyair.org www.healthyairliving.com Printed on recycled paper.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4854 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4854

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
  To amend the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 to provide 
   additional resources to State and local prosecutors, and for other 
                                purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice Served Act of 2018''.
SEC. 2. PROSECUTION OF DNA COLD CASES.
    (a) Debbie Smith DNA Backlog Grant Program.--Section 2 of the DNA 
Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (34 U.S.C. 40701) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following:
        ``(9) To increase the capacity of State and local prosecution 
    offices to address the backlog of violent crime cases in which 
    suspects have been identified through DNA evidence.''; and
        (2) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the following:
        ``(5) Allocation of grant awards for prosecutors.--For each 
    fiscal year, not less than 5 percent, but not more than 7 percent, 
    of the grant amounts distributed under paragraph (1) shall, if 
    sufficient applications to justify such amounts are received by the 
    Attorney General, be awarded for purposes described in subsection 
    (a)(9), provided that none of the funds required to be distributed 
    under this paragraph shall decrease or otherwise limit the 
    availability of funds required to be awarded to States or units of 
    local government under paragraph (3).''.
    (b) Prosecution of Cold Cases.--Of the amounts made available to 
the Attorney General for a DNA Analysis and capacity enhancement 
program and for other local, State, and Federal forensic activities for 
the purpose described in section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog 
Elimination Act of 2000 (34 U.S.C. 40701) under the heading ``state and 
local law enforcement assistance'' under the heading ``Office of 
Justice Programs'' under the heading ``DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE'' in 
fiscal years 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, not less than 5 percent, but 
not more than 7 percent, of such amounts shall be provided for grants 
for prosecutors to increase the capacity of State and local prosecution 
offices to address cold cases involving violent crime, where suspects 
have been identified through DNA evidence.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF ULTRATECH STEPPER, INC.

The following is a list of Ultratech Stepper Inc.'s subsidiaries including their jurisdiction of incorporation as of December 31, 2001:

Subsidiaries

Jurisdiction of incorporationIntegrated Lithography Systems, Inc.

KoreaIntegrated Semiconductor Solutions, Ltd.

United KingdomUltratech Stepper International, Inc.

State of Delaware, USAUltratech Stepper UK Limited

United KingdomUltratech Stepper Foreign Sales Corp.

BarbadosUltratech Kabushiki Kaisha

JapanUltratech Stepper East, Inc. (formerly UTS Acquisition Sub, Inc., Ultratech Capital, Inc. and Ultratech Stepper Capital, Inc.)

State of Delaware, USAUltratech Stepper (Thailand) Co. LTD.

ThailandU.S. Advanced Lithography LLC

State of Delaware, USAUltratech Stepper (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

People's Republic of China


---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4689 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4689

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau of Reclamation 
   within the Northport Irrigation District in the State of Nebraska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EARLY REPAYMENT OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS.
    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 213 of the Reclamation 
Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390mm), any landowner within the 
Northport Irrigation District in the State of Nebraska (referred to in 
this section as the ``District'') may repay, at any time, the 
construction costs of project facilities allocated to the landowner's 
land within the District.
    (b) Applicability of Full-Cost Pricing Limitations.--On discharge, 
in full, of the obligation for repayment of all construction costs 
described in subsection (a) that are allocated to all land the 
landowner owns in the District in question, the parcels of land shall 
not be subject to the ownership and full-cost pricing limitations under 
Federal reclamation law (the Act of June 17, 1902, 32 Stat. 388, 
chapter 1093), and Acts supplemental to and amendatory of that Act (43 
U.S.C. 371 et seq.), including the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (13 
U.S.C. 390aa et seq.).
    (c) Certification.--On request of a landowner that has repaid, in 
full, the construction costs described in subsection (a), the Secretary 
of the Interior shall provide to the landowner a certificate described 
in section 213(b)(1) of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 
390mm(b)(1)).
    (d) Effect.--Nothing in this section--
        (1) modifies any contractual rights under, or amends or 
    reopens, the reclamation contract between the District and the 
    United States; or
        (2) modifies any rights, obligations, or relationships between 
    the District and landowners in the District under Nebraska State 
    law.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3(File Nos. 333-38613, 333-55078, 333-104294, 333-105141 and 333-126125) and Form S-8 (File Nos.033-84510, 333-14155, 333-27201, 333-27203, 333-27205, 333-60333 and 333-123829) of ColonialProperties Trust of our report dated March 10, 2006 relating to the consolidated financialstatements, financial statement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, which appears in this Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 1118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00241]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4730-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]


Alaska; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alaska (FEMA-4730-DR), dated August 23, 2023, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on December 14, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Brian F. 
Schiller, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating 
Officer for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Lance E. Davis as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-00241 Filed 1-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
EX-10.2






ADDENDUM NO. 3




to the




QUOTA SHARE REINSURANCE AGREEMENT

Dated as of March 27, 2003




(hereinafter referred to as the “Original Agreement”)




between




PLATINUM RE (UK) LIMITED

(hereinafter referred to as the “Company”)




and




PLATINUM UNDERWRITERS BERMUDA, LTD

(hereinafter referred to as the “Reinsurer”)




WHEREAS, the Reinsurer and the Company are parties to the Original Agreement.



NOW THEREFORE, effective from the Commencement of the Original Agreement, the parties hereto hereby
agree to amend the said agreement as follows:



EXCLUSIONS



The following Exclusion Clauses are attached to and form part of this Agreement:




	 	1.	 	Losses emanating from the Excess of Loss Retrocession Agreement by and
between Platinum Re (UK) Limited and Platinum Underwriters Bermuda, Ltd. dated as of
April 1 2005.





All other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement remain unchanged.



In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have caused this Addendum No.1 to be executed by their duly
authorized representatives.




Platinum Underwriters Bermuda, Ltd.




By: /s/ Francois Bertrand _




	 	 	 	Name: Francois Bertrand

Title: Senior Vice President






Platinum Re (UK) Limited




	 	 	 	By:
/s/ Les Waters _






	 	 	 	Name: Les Waters






Title: Underwriting Manager
# Warren - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Pennsylvania Wilds: Connecting Nature, Culture, and Entrepreneurship Fifty state game lands, 29 state parks, 8 state forests, and one National Forest make the Pennsylvania Wilds.The post Pennsylvania Wilds: Connecting Nature, Culture, and Entrepreneurship appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission Executive Director Jill Foys Email &#160;jill&#102;&#64;&#110;&#111;&#114;&#116;&#104;&#x77;&#x65;&#x73;&#x74;&#x70;&#x61;&#x2e;&#x6f;&#x72;gThe post Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk April 28 , 2017

15 5 4 1 3 ( 29 )

SUSAN BLACKWELL

, Plaintiff

- Appellee

, SC: 15 5 4 1 3

v COA: 32 8 929

Oakland CC : 2014

- 141562

- NI

DEAN FRANCHI and DEBRA FRANCHI

, Defendant s

- Appellant s

. _________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of the Michigan Manufacturers

Association to file an amicus curiae brief in support of the application for leave to appeal

is GRANTED

. The amicus brief submitted on April 24 , 2017 , is accepted for filing.
1 The Honorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3479

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas Leon Bell, Jr., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 19, 1999 Filed: March 26, 1999

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Leon Bell, Jr., appeals from the final judgment entered in the United States DistrictCourt 1 for the Eastern District of Arkansas after he pleaded guilty to affecting commerce by robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951; and to using and carrying a firearmduring and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). The district court sentenced appellant to two consecutive terms of 60 months imprisonment, plus 3 years of supervised release. For reversal appellant-2-

argues the district court erred in not granting him an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3E1.1 (1998).
The district court & s decision whether to grant such a reduction “is afforded greatdeference and will not be disturbed unless it is clearly erroneous.” United States v. Evans , 51 F.3d 764, 766 (8th Cir. 1995); see U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3E1.1, comment. (n.5) (1998). After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude the court did not clearly err in finding Bell had not met his burden of demonstrating that he had accepted responsibility, given Bell’s vague admission to the probation officer about his offense conduct and his failure to add anything of substance when addressing the court at sentencing. See UnitedStates v. Mohamed , 161 F.3d 1132, 1136 (8th Cir. 1998) (defendant not entitled to reduction merely because she pleads guilty), petition for cert. filed , No. 98-8243 (U.S. Feb. 16, 1999); Unit ed States v. Hawkins , 78 F.3d 348, 352 (1996) (voluntarily admitting involve ment in offense does not automatically entitle defendant to reduction), cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 126 (1996); UnitedStates v. Byrd , 76 F.3d 194, 196-97 (8th Cir. 1996) (discussing burden); cf. United States v. Chevre , 146 F.3d 622, 625 (8th Cir. 1998) (defendant may receive reduction if he demonstrates recognition and affirmative responsibility for offense and sincere remorse). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 426th District Court of Bell County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on June 17,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Lane Andrew Pickle v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-15-00021-CR Trial Court Number: 73248

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated June 17, 2015, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis

, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on September 3, 2015

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK