alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Matrix Concepts, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the
undersigned's knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


8/19/02                                    /s/ Gerry Martin
---------------                            -------------------------------------
Date                                       President and Chief Executive Officer

8/19/02                                    /s/ Gerry Martin
---------------                            -------------------------------------
Date                                       Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4890 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4890

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 9801 Apollo Drive in Upper Marlboro, Maryland, as the ``Wayne K. Curry 
                         Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. WAYNE K. CURRY POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9801 Apollo Drive in Upper Marlboro, Maryland, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Wayne K. Curry Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Wayne K. 
Curry Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.32  


 
  Compensation Arrangements for the Named Executive Officers    
    



        Set forth below is a summary of the compensation by SEACOR Holdings Inc. (the "Company") to its named executive officers (defined in
Regulation S-K Item 402(a)(3)) in their positions as of the date of filing of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2004 (the "Form 10-K/A"). All of the Company's named executive officers are at-will employees whose compensation and employment status may be changed at any time in the
discretion of the Company's Board of Directors. 



        Base Salary.    Effective January 1, 2005, the named executive officers are scheduled to receive the following annual
base salaries in their current positions: 



	Name and Current Position
 
	 	Base Salary ($)

	Charles Fabrikant

Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer	 	$	600,000
	Randall Blank

Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, and Secretary	 	$	335,000
	Dick Fagerstal

Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Treasurer	 	$	300,000
	John Gellert

Senior Vice President	 	$	180,000
	Alice Gran

Senior Vice President and General Counsel	 	$	300,000





        Cash Bonus and Share Incentive Plan.    In their current positions, the named executive officers are eligible to: 



	•
	Receive
an annual cash incentive award subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.



	•
	Participate
in incentive programs, which currently involve awards of restricted stock and stock options pursuant to the Company's 2003 Share Incentive Plan
(Exhibit 10.24 to the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004). 




        Benefit Plans and Other Arrangements.    In their current positions, the named executive officers are eligible to participate in
the Company's broad-based benefit programs generally available to its salaried employees, including health, disability and life insurance programs, and a qualified 401(k) plan. 











QuickLinks


Compensation Arrangements for the Named Executive Officers
#### John D. Gross, Plaintiff, *v.*County Treasurer of Orange County, Defendant.

County Court, Orange County,

November 2, 1959.

*James P. Tamsen*for plaintiff.

*Thomas R. Hadaway, County Attorney,*for defendant.

*Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General {Harry Silvers*of counsel), for State of New York.

Edward M. O’Gorman, J.

The plaintiff has brought an action against the Treasurer of Orange County for the repayment of money which he claims is wrongfully withheld. The money was taken from the plaintiff by the police, who turned it over to the District Attorney, and was by him turned over to the County Treasurer.

The defendant claims to be entitled to retain this money, inasmuch as it is claimed to be the proceeds of gambling.

On a prior motion, we held that the plaintiff’s right to recover will depend on proof that the money was not the proceeds of gambling.

*739The Attorney-General now seeks to intervene on behalf of the State of New York, on the ground that if it should be determined that the money is the proceeds of illegal gambling, then and in such event, the money should be turned over to the State of New York. This claim, it is urged, is paramount to that of the Treasurer of the County of Orange.

An analysis of the provisions of the Penal Law with respect to gambling reveals no provision governing this situation. The Court of Appeals, in *Hofferman*v. *Simmons*(290 N. Y. 449 [1943]) has heretofore held that a gambler may not recover from the municipal officer holding funds which were the proceeds of gambling. In reaching this conclusion, the court has further indicated its agreement that the penal statutes lack any directions as to the disposition of money seized from the gamblers by police.

Applying the foregoing to the instant case, it is the court’s opinion that the County of Orange, when in possession of the proceeds of illegal gambling, has a good title thereto as against the gambler who seeks its return, and as against the.State of New York, which cannot establish a better title.

In our view, the State of New York, having no statutory authority for its claim to the money involved in this case, should fail in this effort to intervene in the action.

Submit order.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Colony RIH Holdings, Inc. and Resorts International Hotel and Casino, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark B. Lefever, Senior Vice President Finance/CFO and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MARK B. LEFEVER                                              
|Mark B. Lefever                                                  
|Senior Vice President Finance/CFO and Principal Financial Officer



May
13, 2005
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 28, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-1180 Lower Tribunal No. 19-31079

________________ Grand Bay Residences Condominium Association, Inc., etc., et al., 

### Appellants,
vs. Key Bay Club, LLLP, etc., et al.,



### Appellees. An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Reemberto Diaz, Judge. Rasco, Klock, Perez & Nieto, P.L., and Ramon E. Rasco and Juan Carlos Antorcha and Paul C. Savage, for appellants. Shubin & Bass, P.A., and John K. Shubin and Juan J. Farach and Alannah L. Shubrick, for appellee Key Bay Club, LLLP. Before SCALES, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<Table>
<Caption>
SUBSIDIARY OR ORGANIZATION                              JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
--------------------------                              -----------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>
ACS STORES, LLC                                         DELAWARE
AMERICA'S COUNTRY STORES HOLDINGS, LLC                  DELAWARE
AMERICA'S COUNTRY STORES, LLC                           DELAWARE
CONROE ACS COMPANY, LLC                                 TEXAS
ESSV, L.L.C.                                            DELAWARE
HEJLIK PIG CO., L.C.                                    IOWA
PM NUTRITION COMPANY, LLC                               DELAWARE
PMI AGRICULTURE, LLC                                    MISSOURI
PMI NUTRITION INTERNATIONAL, LLC                        DELAWARE
PMI NUTRITION, LLC                                      DELAWARE
</Table>
**Exhibit23.1**

 

CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.333-41905 and No. 333-68636) of National R.V. Holdings, Inc. of our reportdated October 6, 2005, except for the restatement discussed in the second andsixth paragraphs of Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements and thematters discussed in the penultimate paragraph of Management’s Report onInternal Control over Financial Reporting, as to which the date is March 21,2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule,management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP

Orange County, California

March 21, 2006

 

----
**Exhibit 10.3**

**MCG Capital Corporation**

**2008 Retention Program**

On August 6, 2008, the Board of Directors of MCG Capital Corporation (“MCG” or the “Company”) approved the MCG Capital Corporation RetentionProgram (the “Retention Program”) for the benefit of the Company’s employees, including one of its named executive officers (but excluding the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and ChiefOperating Officer, Executive Vice President of Business Development and General Counsel, Executive Vice President) (collectively, the “Eligible Employees”). The Retention Program is designed to provide Eligible Employees with certainincentives related to their past service and continuing employment with MCG. The Retention Program consists of an aggregate of (i) $3.35 million in cash (approximately $2.7 million of which shall be awarded in August 2008 and approximately$650,000 of which shall be awarded in early 2009 once the Company’s year-end results for 2008 have been determined) and (ii) up to 735,000 shares of restricted common stock, $0.01 par value per share, of the Company (the “CommonStock”). 

***Retention Payments***

Under the Retention Program, each Eligible Employee shall be awarded a cash payment (each a “Retention Payment”) representing a specified percentage of each such Eligible Employee’s annual cash bonus target for the fiscalyear ending December 31, 2008. Each Retention Payment shall be paid to each Eligible Employee in three equal installments on each of March 31, 2009, June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2009, subject to continued employment withMCG. 

***Restricted Stock Awards***

Additionally, pursuant to the Retention Program, specified Eligible Employees shall be awarded shares of restricted Common Stock under the MCG Capital Corporation 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan, as amended (each, a “RetentionStock Award”). The forfeiture provisions with respect to 100% of the shares of restricted Common Stock subject to each Retention Stock Award shall lapse on March 31, 2011 (the “Vesting Date”). 

The Company’s Board of Directors has approved the Retention Payment and Retention Stock Award for the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer. The CompensationCommittee of the Board of Directors has approved the Retention Payments and Retention Stock Awards for specified officers of the Company and has authorized management to determine the specific dollar amount of each Retention Payment and the numberof shares of restricted Common Stock constituting each Retention Stock Award for the remaining Eligible Employees.
A poverty rate is the ratio of the persons below the poverty level 

to the total number of persons for whom poverty status has been 

determined. The map uses natural breaks in the distribution to 

organize the data into groups of common values. 

Map Created: March 2014

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2008–2012

Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2008–2012

(County Rates)

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

28.2% - 41.4%

21.5% - 28.1%

15.8% - 21.4%

6.7% - 15.7%

Poverty Rate 

(Natural Breaks Classification) 

U.S. average = 14.9%

Appalachian average = 16.6%
**Exhibit 15.1**

August 5, 2010 

The Board of Directorsand Shareholders 

MCG Capital Corporation 

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-137565 and Form S-8 No. 333-167494) pertainingto the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation and the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Non- Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation of our report dated August 5, 2010relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements and schedules of MCG Capital Corporation included in its Form 10-Q for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Exhibit
10.3




[Protalex,
Inc. Letterhead]




March 16,
2005

 

Mr.
Carleton A. Holstrom

112 Mount
Airy Road

Pipersville,
PA 18947

 

Dear
Carl:

 

Protalex,
Inc. (the “Company”) is pleased that, as of October 26, 2004, you joined our
board of directors. This letter provides you with some basic information related
to your decision to join our board.

 

Term

 

Generally,
directors are elected by our stockholders at our annual stockholders’ meeting.
Directors hold office for one-year terms and until re-elected or their
successors are elected and qualified, unless they resign or are removed earlier.
You may resign at any time upon written notice to the Company and may be
removed, with or without cause, at any time by the vote or written consent of
the stockholders representing not less than a majority of the issued and
outstanding capital stock entitled to voting power. Additional information
regarding the terms of directors is set out in Section II of the Company’s
current bylaws.

 

Director’s
Fees

 

You will
receive $20,000 annually as director’s fees. As a director you will not receive
separate meeting fees, but you will be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses
related to attending board meetings in accordance with the Company’s
reimbursement policies. 

 

Additionally,
you received 100,000 fully vested stock options under the Company’s 2003 Stock
Option Plan, exercisable at $2.30, which will expire on October 26, 2014, if not
exercised. This grant is subject to the further terms and conditions of the
Company’s 2003 Stock Option Plan and the corresponding Stock Option Agreement.
Please note that, as a director of the Company, you are required to file reports
under Section 16 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 related to your
ownership of the Company’s securities. We have provided you with a separate
memorandum that sets out these requirements in further detail.

 

Carl,
your superb qualifications make you a welcomed member of our board of directors.
We are glad you have chosen to become a director of Protalex, Inc. If you have
any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.

 

Very
truly yours,

 

PROTALEX,
INC.

 

/s/
Steven H. Kane 

Steven H.
Kane

Chief
Executive Officer

 

Accepted
and approved:

 

/s/
Carleton A. Holstrom 

Carleton
A. Holstrom
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1394

ROBERT E. GREEN, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE; BALTIMORE

POLICE DEPARTMENT; SOD DECOY SQUAD; CARL STAMBAUGH, Officer, and other members of the SOD

Decoy Squad,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-00-

711-MJG)

Submitted: May 31, 2000 Decided: June 20, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert E. Green, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. William Rowe Phelan, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE CITY SOLICITOR, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert E. Green, Sr. appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court but modify the court’s order to

provide that the dismissal of Green’s complaint is without prejudice. See Green v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, No. CA00-711-MJG (D. Md. Mar. 21 & 29, 2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
D870 

Monday, September 17, 2012 

Daily Digest 

Senate 

Chamber Action 

The Senate met at 2:00:13 p.m. in pro forma session, and adjourned at 2:00:41 p.m. until 10 a.m., 

on Wednesday, September 19, 2012. 

Committee Meetings 

h 

No committee meetings were held. 

House of Representatives 

Chamber Action 

The House was not in session today. The House 

is scheduled to meet at 12 noon on Tuesday, September 18, 2012 in pro forma session. 

Joint Meetings 

No joint committee meetings were held. 

f 

COMMITTEE MEETINGS FOR TUESDAY, 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2012 

(Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated) 

Senate 

No meetings/hearings scheduled. 

House 

No hearings are scheduled. 

f 

CONGRESSIONAL PROGRAM AHEAD 

Week of September 18 through 

September 21, 2012 

Senate Chamber 

On Wednesday, at approximately 10 a.m., Senate 

will resume consideration of S. 3457, Veterans Jobs 

Corps Act, with a vote on the motion to waive the 

Budget Act with respect to Reid (for Murray) 

Amendment No. 2789, at approximately 12:00 p.m. 

At 2:15 p.m., Senate will vote on the motion to invoke cloture on the motion to proceed to consideration of H.J. Res. 117, Continuing Appropriations 

Resolution. 

During the balance of the week, Senate may consider any cleared legislative and executive business. 

Senate Committees 

(Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated) 

Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs: September 20, Subcommittee on Securities, Insurance and Investment, to hold hearings to examine computerized trading, 10 a.m., SD–538. 

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation: September 19, to hold hearings to examine five years of the 

‘‘America COMPETES Act’’, focusing on progress, challenges, and next steps, 2:30 p.m., SR–253. 

September 20, Full Committee, to hold hearings to examine business practices in the household goods moving 

industry, 10 a.m., SR–253. 

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources: September 

19, Subcommittee on Water and Power, to hold hearings 

to examine S. 3265, to amend the Federal Power Act to 

remove the authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission to collect land use fees for land that has been 

sold, exchanged, or otherwise transferred from Federal 

ownership but that is subject to a power site reservation, 

H.R. 2842, to authorize all Bureau of Reclamation conduit facilities for hydropower development under Federal 

Reclamation law, S. 3464, to amend the Mni Wiconi 

Project Act of 1988 to facilitate completion of the Mni 

Wiconi Rural Water Supply System, and S. 3483, to 

amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to adjust the 

Crooked River boundary, to provide water certainty for 

the City of Prineville, Oregon, 9:30 a.m., SD–366. 

Committee on Environment and Public Works: September 

20, to hold hearings to examine the ‘‘Water Resources 


smartinez on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with DIGEST