alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009019EN.01002003.xml

| 24.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/20

---

Action brought on 28 November 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-527/08)

(2009/C 19/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Simonsson, A.A. Gilly, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/65/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on enhancing port security, or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/65/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on enhancing port security, or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive;

1

| — | order United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive had to be transposed expired on 15 July 2007.

---

(1)  OJ L 310, p. 28.

1

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 19, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 19, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18A0520. WILLIAM RYLES v. CITY OF STONE MOUNTAIN.
The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On November 09, 2017, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than November 20, 2017. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Annual Report of Ultratech, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Ultratech, Inc.
 By:
    
    /s/ Arthur Zafiropoulo
    
    Date: February 26, 2009Name: Arthur ZafiropouloTitle: Chief Executive Officer
  
    
    the Annual Report of Ultratech, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Ultratech, Inc.
 By:
    
    /s/ Bruce Wright
    
    Date: February 26, 2009Name: Bruce WrightTitle: Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 10.43
 aASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.48761 Kato RoadFremont, CA 94538Tel: 510.661.5000Fax: 510.661.5166Private and Confidential
  
   Position:
 Base Salary:
 Retention Payment/Relocation Assistance:




---



##### 



Management Bonus Plan:
  Stock Awards:
 1.
    
    105,000 shares of restricted stock, which shall vest in three (3) equal installments as
of each of the first three (3) anniversaries of the award date; and2.
    
    150,000 stock option shares, which shall vest in three (3) equal installments as of
each of the first three (3) anniversaries of the award date.




---



##### 



Other Benefits:
   At Will Employment:




---



##### 



Other Matters:
      /s/ Stephen S. SchwartzStephen S. SchwartzChairman, President & CEO
 Understood, Agreed and Accepted:




---



##### 



/s/ Michael A. Sicuro
    
    
    
    1.19.07Michael A. Sicuro
    
    
    
    Date[intended start date]
 Attachments:
    
    Proprietary Information AgreementAgreement to Arbitrate Disputes and ClaimsCode of Conduct/Finance Code of ConductOfficers questionnaireIndemnity AgreementChange-in-Control Agreement
 Confidential  Asyst Technologies, Inc.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H5769-H5770]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 IN HONOR OF TROOPER BOBBY GENE DEMUTH

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from

[[Page H5770]]

North Carolina (Mr. Butterfield) for 5 minutes.
  Mr. BUTTERFIELD. Mr. Speaker, I rise on this solemn day in the 
history of our Nation, the 11th anniversary of the terror attacks on 9/
11, to honor and pay tribute to a North Carolina State Trooper who was 
killed in the line of duty this past Saturday morning. It was a tragic 
incident.
  Trooper Bobby Gene DeMuth served the State of North Carolina proudly 
and honorably for 12 years. He was assigned to the Rocky Mount Troop C, 
District One Highway Patrol.
  Trooper DeMuth loved his work. He loved his work as a law enforcement 
officer. He protected the good of our society from the bad, and he 
fought to make North Carolina a safer place. Trooper DeMuth's life was 
tragically cut short, and he was killed while in the line of duty. He 
was pursuing an individual suspected of some very serious crime. He was 
serving and protecting.
  Following a 20-mile, 30-minute high-speed pursuit that began in our 
capital city of Raleigh, and ended by the heroic effort of Trooper 
Bobby Gene DeMuth, the suspect was apprehended.
  Tomorrow, Trooper DeMuth will be laid to rest at Inglewood Baptist 
Church in Rocky Mount, North Carolina. It is a sad day indeed. Trooper 
DeMuth, like so many of the first responders who passed away 11 years 
ago, deserves our heartfelt thanks and appreciation for doing what only 
a select few can do, and that is to protect and defend the public 
against those who do it harm.
  May God bless Trooper Bobby Gene DeMuth, his family, and each and 
every person that puts himself in harm's way to protect the greater 
good.

                          ____________________
```
================================================================================
                      Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the amended  Quarterly Report of Whistler  Investments,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the  quarter  ended April 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Holly Roseberry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge:  (1) The Report fully  complies
with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

                                                             /s/ Holly Roseberry
                                                           ---------------------
                                                                 Holly Roseberry
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

October 4, 2004
# ni

Mr. Denrii:. DeVany and Mr. Scott Faulk**Es~tial** 

### Air Service 

### Division. X-53 Office ofAviation Analysis, Room 6401 Department Transportation 400 7th St., S.W. 

### Washington, DC 20590

Re: EAS Docket#DOT**~OST**-1996·1903

Dear Mr. DeVany andMr. Faulk: October 11,2012 

### lfJ!Z 

### !2 1: 33

lam writing in support ofOrant County's 

### and the Town 

### Silver City's decision 

### support Great 

### Lakes Airlines in their bid 

### to continue :.ervice 

### through the 

### U.S. Department Transportation's Essential Air $ervice (BAS) .Program. Creat Lakes. 

### Airlines woutd provide two 

### roun\1 trips day between 

### Phoenix: and 

### Silver City using twin 

### engine, pressurized aircraft. EAS remains vital to Crant County's currentneeds md future gto'Wth, and air service to a major 

### hub like 

### Phoenix will 

### help to f4rther boost the county's social and economic health. 

### Thank you for 

### your consideration of

### lliant County's and Silver City's preference for their 

### next EAS service. provider. Should you .have 

### any questions., please do not 

### hesitate to 

### contact me ormy Field Representative, Dara 

### Parkcer, at575-523-6561 or d4U'a**_pll'ker@bingaman.senate~aov.** Sincerely.

# ~ JeffBingaman United States Senator

Cc: Jon Paul Saari, CountyManager, Crant County James**Marshall~ Mayor~**  Town of

### Silver City

JBildp
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-5045 

JOYCE EVANS, MIKE ARABIAN, dba Arabian Farms, AULAKH FARMS, INC., 

JACK BLEHM, MARY BLEHM, EARL BOYAJIAN, LYNDEN BRACK, 

RICHARD CHAVEZ, SALLY CHAVEZ, dba Chavez Farms, NEIL DONOVAN, 

WILLIAM DONOVAN, DAVID FLAGLER, WALTER GEORGE FLAGLER, 

 dba Flagler Farms, CHRIS GAUSS, BRAD HANSEN, DAVID HORNE, 

 MELANIE HORNE, dba M&D Farming, MIKE JERKOVICH, 

KULDIP KALEKA, CHARANJIT KALEKA, dba Kaleka Farms, LOREN T. LINSCHEID, dba 

Linscheid Farms, MICHAEL A. LOGOLUSO, SR., RICK L. LOGOLUSO, TONY M. 

LOGOLUSO, WAYNE MCFARLANE, MIKE MOLES, HUNTER NADLER, TOM OCHOA, 

TERESA OCHOA, dba Ochoa Farms, GREGORY PATTERSON, DONNA PATTERSON, 

MORRIS PIVOVAROFF, PETER RAMIREZ, ROBERT SCHNEIDER, DALE SEDOO, 

WALT SHUBIN, WAYNE SNELL, SRABIAN FARMS GP, and WILKENS FARM, 

 Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

 David A. Domina, Domina Law Group PC LLO, of Omaha, Nebraska, argued for 

plaintiffs-appellants. 

 Timothy P. Mcilmail, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United 

States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With 

him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Acting Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, 

Director, and Mark A. Melnick, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was Heather M. 

Pichelman, United States Department of Agriculture, of Washington, DC. 

 James S. Burling, Pacific Legal Foundation, of Sacramento, California, for amicus 

curiae. 

Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims 

Judge Charles F. Lettow 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-5045 

JOYCE EVANS, MIKE ARABIAN, dba Arabian Farms, AULAKH FARMS, INC., 

JACK BLEHM, MARY BLEHM, EARL BOYAJIAN, LYNDEN BRACK, 

RICHARD CHAVEZ, SALLY CHAVEZ, dba Chavez Farms, NEIL DONOVAN, 

WILLIAM DONOVAN, DAVID FLAGLER, WALTER GEORGE FLAGLER, 

dba Flagler Farms, CHRIS GAUSS, BRAD HANSEN, DAVID HORNE, 

MELANIE HORNE, dba M&D Farming, MIKE JERKOVICH, 

KULDIP KALEKA, CHARANJIT KALEKA, dba Kaleka Farms, LOREN T. LINSCHEID, 

dba Linscheid Farms, MICHAEL A. LOGOLUSO, SR., RICK L. LOGOLUSO, TONY M. 

LOGOLUSO, WAYNE MCFARLANE, MIKE MOLES, HUNTER NADLER, TOM 

OCHOA, TERESA OCHOA, dba Ochoa Farms, GREGORY PATTERSON, DONNA 

PATTERSON, MORRIS PIVOVAROFF, PETER RAMIREZ, ROBERT SCHNEIDER, 

DALE SEDOO, WALT SHUBIN, WAYNE SNELL, SRABIAN FARMS GP, and 

WILKENS FARM, 

 Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

Judgment 

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS 

 

In CASE NO(S). 06-CV-439. 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam: (MAYER and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges and RESTANI, Judge.*): 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

DATED: October 4, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly, Clerk 

* Honorable Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge of the United States Court of International 

Trade, sitting by designation.
Map Created: March 2016

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2014

Per Capita Market Income Rates in Appalachia, 2014

(County Rates)

Per capita market income is a measure of an area's total 

personal income, less transfer payments, divided by the resident 

population of the area. The map uses natural breaks in the 

distribution to organize the data into groups of common values. 

0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

$9,763 - $19,270

$19,271 - $24,491

$24,492 - $31,625

$31,626 - $44,944

Per Capita Market Income

U.S. average = $38,117

Appalachian average = $28,317

(Natural Breaks Classification)
**Exhibit32.1**

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies,Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,2006, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Ricardo Salas                                    |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Ricardo Salas, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 9, 2006                                       |

 

1

----
Exhibit 10.2


 


THE SCO
GROUP, INC.


 


SUMMARY
OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


 


The following table sets forth the annual base salary
for each of the named executive officers of The SCO Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
for fiscal year 2005:


 


	
  Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  Base Salary

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Darl C. McBride

  President and Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  265,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Bert B. Young

  Chief Financial Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  170,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Christopher Sontag

  Senior Vice President, Business Development

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  160,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Jeff F. Hunsaker

  Senior Vice President and General Manager, UNIX Division

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  160,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Ryan E. Tibbitts

  General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  145,000

  	
   

  



 


In addition to the foregoing amounts, each of the
officers named above is eligible to receive additional cash compensation
pursuant to The SCO Group Employee Incentive Bonus Program for fiscal year 2005
more particularly described in Item 5(a) of the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2005.
# C_2008158EN.01002001.xml

| 21.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/20

---

Action brought on 21 April 2008 — REWE-Zentral v OHIM — Aldi Einkauf (Clina)

(Case T-150/08)

(2008/C 158/33)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: REWE-Zentral AG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG (Essen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 February 2008 in Case R 1484/2006-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 February 2008 in Case R 1484/2006-4;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Clina’ for goods in Classes 3 and 21 (Application No 3 921 079)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark ‘CLINAIR’ for goods in Classes 3 and 5 (Community trade mark No 1 769 850)

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Opposition Division's decision and rejection of the trade mark application

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) as there is no likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 25, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5208]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER

  The SPEAKER. The Chair will entertain up to 15 requests for 1-minute 
speeches on each side of the aisle.

                          ____________________
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ JOHN E. JACKSONName:
    
    John E. JacksonTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**WELDON FELLS,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 13 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 20th day of April, 2016, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
Exhibit 10.1









  Equity Transfer Agreement

















Transferor:Li Yuan


Transferee:Baichuang Information Consulting (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd












With the consensus after negotiation of the above-mentioned parties, and agreed by the Shareholders' Meeting of Jiangsu Xuefeng Environmental Project Science and Technology Co., Ltd,the transferor transfers his 93% of the shares (totally 42.9 million Yuan) held in the Company for free, this agreement shall enter into force on the date of signature and seal of both parties, the transferor will not enjoy the rights for being a shareholder and no longer perform the obligations for being a shareholder. The transferee begins to own the rights of shareholders and performs their obligations as a shareholder.

















Transferor:Li Yuan


Transferee:Baichuang Information Consulting (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd












January 11, 2016
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ENCORE ENTERPRISES, INC.,

A TEXAS CORPORATION,

ENCORE BORDERPLEX, LLC,

EMF GRAND MISSION

INVESTMENTS, LP, AND

ENCORE MF SENDERO, L.P.,

Appellant s,

v.

BORDERPLEX REALTY TRUST, A

MARYLAND REAL ESTATE

INVESTMENT TRUST, AND

BRT REALTY OPERATING LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP,

Appellee s. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 17

- 00153

- CV

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 6

of El Paso Co unty, Texas

(TC # 2016

- DCV2446 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellees

recover from Appellants and its sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43 .5, on the judgment and all

costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2018.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justic e

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

McClure, C.J., not participating
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6233]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. ROSS of Florida:
        H.R. 6474.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8: ``The Congress shall have power to 
     lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay 
     the debts and provide for the common defense and general 
     welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and 
     excises shall be uniform throughout the United States.''
```