alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF TENNESSEE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 

NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243-0435 

JAMES H. FYKE PHIL BREDESEN 

COMMISSIONER GOVERNOR 

November 23, 2010 

Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 4 

61 Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104 

Re: Alamo Contaminated Groundwater Plume NPL Listing 

Dear Administrator Fleming: 

I have spoken with Andy Binford, our Division of Remediation Director, concerning the 

presence of perchloroethylene (PCE) in the groundwater in Alamo Contaminated Groundwater 

Plume. We appreciate the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (US EPA) interest in this site 

as an EPA National Priority List (NPL) site. We support your efforts to add this site to the NPL. 

Because the City of Alamo uses the Memphis Sands Aquifer as its source of drinking water and 

recent sampling confirms that groundwater in the area of the City's individual water production 

wells is contaminated with volatile organic constituents including PCE, we believe 

environmental investigation and remediation is very important. We do believe that public health 

has been protected because the· City of Alamo installed, operates and maintains an effective 

groundwater system to remove PCE from water distributed via the local water supply system. 

We support, and will assist as we can, an Engineering Evaluation I Cost Analysis (EE/CA) effort 

by USEP A under the Superfund Remedial Program to determine whether an interim remedial 

action such as' relocating the City of Alamo water supply is necessary prior to performing the, 

remedial iJ+vestigation and feasibility study. If relocating the Alamo water supply is appropriate, 

then additional actions may be evaluated under the remedial investigation and feasibility study 

including enhanced bioremediation. 

This concurrence letter does not obligate the State of Tennessee to provide any matching funds 

to the remedial action. Further, it is Tennessee's preference that remedial actions limit long term 

and expensive corrective action, particularly operation and maintenance costs for USEP A and 
._-------------_._-------------------

Ms Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming 

November 23, 2010 

Page 2 

the state. We will negotiate matching funds and/or operation and maintenance expenses as a part 

of a future Superfund State Contract. 

If you have questions, please contact Mr. Andy Binford, Director of TDEC's Division of 

Remediation at (615) 532-0911 or Andy.Binford@tn.gov .. 

Deputy Commissioner 

Cc: 	 Franklin Hill, EPA 

John Nolen, EPA 

Chuck Head, TDEC 

Andy Binford, TDEC
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 429 9

_____________________________ A BDULLAH H AKEEM , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Angela M. Cox , Judge

. June 11, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R AY , B ILBREY , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
In the Senate of the United States, 

November 15, 2018. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 4407) entitled ‘‘An Act to designate the facility 

of the United States Postal Service located at 3s101 Rockwell 

Street in Warrenville, Illinois, as the ‘Corporal Jeffery Allen 

Williams Post Office Building’.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENTS: 

1 Ω1æOn page 2, line 1, strike øJeffery¿ and insert Jeffrey. 

2 Ω2æOn page 2, line 6, strike øJeffery¿ and insert Jeffrey. 

3 Ω3æOn page 2, line 10, strike øJeffery¿ and insert Jeffrey. 

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘An Act to designate 

the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

3s101 Rockwell Street in Warrenville, Illinois, as the 

‘Corporal Jeffrey Allen Williams Post Office Building’.’’. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 4407 

AMENDMENTS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1524]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 RESTORING THE DOCTORS OF OUR COUNTRY THROUGH SCHOLARSHIPS ACT OF 2012

                                  _____
                                 

                           HON. JIM McDERMOTT

                             of washington

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 13, 2012

  Mr. McDERMOTT. Mr. Speaker, of all of the challenges facing our 
nation's health-care system, perhaps the most neglected is the gaping 
hole in our workforce of primary-care physicians. One estimate projects 
a shortage of 45,000 primary-care doctors by 2020. Due to the 
retirement of a generation of physicians, the aging of our population, 
and the entry into the system of some 30 million newly insured thanks 
to the Affordable Care Act, we do not have enough primary-care doctors 
to meet the demand, and the problem will continue to worsen without a 
major initiative to produce new doctors.
  Primary-care doctors are the front lines of our physician workforce. 
Under the right conditions, they oversee and coordinate health care for 
their patients. They educate patients on how to prevent illness and 
manage chronic conditions. They are the medical generalists who 
establish long-lasting bonds with patients throughout their lives. 
Proper primary care is also one of the keys to containing health-care 
costs. On the other hand, inadequate primary care leads to neglected 
and mismanaged conditions, which causes costly emergencies and 
illnesses downstream.
  I am introducing the RDOCS Act to help solve this problem. Modeled 
after the successful ROTC program, RDOCS offers full scholarships to 
medical students in exchange for a 5-year service commitment in a 
medically underserved area. RDOCS will be administered by the states, 
which will send RDOCS scholars to their state-operated medical schools. 
RDOCS officers (as they are known after graduation) will then become 
licensed and serve as primary-care doctors in their state of residence. 
The program is authorized to start immediately and begin graduating its 
first additional 4,000 new primary-care doctors in 2020, and 20,000 new 
doctors by 2024.
  Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, we are going to get close to 
universal health coverage in the United States. But universal coverage 
will not be meaningful if we don't have enough doctors to serve our 
population. I am optimistic that Congress can demonstrate leadership in 
restoring our doctor workforce for the next generation.

                          ____________________
```
# Guidelines & Manuals Archives - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Match Rate Calculator DISCLAIMER: This tool is made available to provide prospective applicants an initial reference to calculate match requirements. The use of this tool is at the applicant’s sole discretion and it does not bind ARC to award a grant nor to award a grant at the levels expected from the use of this tool. It does not substitute [&#8230;]The post Match Rate Calculator appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Guide to ARC Project Performance Measures This page will guide you through the process of developing performance measures for your proposed activity.The post Guide to ARC Project Performance Measures appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Application Guidance by Project Type   ARC investments commonly fall into the project types below.&#160;These documents can help prospective applicants develop strong, competitive proposals for their specific project area. Each also highlights pertinent information including project examples, key investment principles, project considerations, and links to additional resources.&#160; This material supplements&#160;other applicant resources&#160;for non-construction and construction projects and should not be used [&#8230;]The post Application Guidance by Project Type   appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Local Access Roads Project Guidelines These guidelines provide Local Access Road (LAR) applicants with specific guidance about project guidelines, eligibility, approval processes, and submission requirements.&#160; These guidelines should be used in conjunction with general applicant resources for all ARC construction projects.The post Local Access Roads Project Guidelines appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Buy America Guidelines This interim guidance describes the type of projects subject to the Buy America requirements and the process to request waivers.The post Buy America Guidelines appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Access to Capital Projects Application and Operating Guidelines These guidelines provide Access to Capital (ATC) grantees with specific guidance abouteligibility in applying; eligibility of borrowers; eligible and ineligible uses of grant funds;conflicts of interest; application requirements; post-award management and monitoring;audits; and consequences of non-compliance.The post Access to Capital Projects Application and Operating Guidelines appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Match Requirements This document provides information on the matching, or cost-sharing, requirements for an ARC award. The post Match Requirements appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- ARC Project Guidelines The guidelines set forth the criteria for approval of ARC projects reflecting the requirements of the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 (ARDA), as amended, the ARC Code, and the provisions of the ARC Strategic Plan. The post ARC Project Guidelines appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Albert Archibald, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

September 23, 1959.

*706
      *Joseph Miller*for Mary Archibald, petitioner.

*BanjaminHerdes*for Ernest A. McKenzie, as executor, respondent.

S. Samuel Di Falco, S.

A motion for summary judgment has been made by the surviving spouse of the decedent in a proceeding which is pending before this court to determine the validity of her right of election. Both the answer interposed in that proceeding and the answering affidavits interposed on this motion contain the affirmative allegation that the surviving spouse is not entitled to exercise her right of election on the ground that she abandoned the decedent as set forth in subdivision 5 of section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law.

The decedent and the surviving spouse were married in 1914. It is alleged that in or -about the year 1922 the decedent discovered his wife in an act of adultery and as a result of this discovery the surviving spouse abandoned him. It is further alleged that in 1922 the decedent instituted a suit for divorce against the surviving spouse charging her with adultery. This action was abandoned and the decedent and the surviving spouse entered into a separation agreement dated January 24, 1924 pursuant to which it was agreed that they would live separately and apart; that he was to pay her $10 per week for her support and the support and maintenance of their child. It must be noted that in such separation agreement there is no mention of the charge of adultery nor of any prior abandonment by the surviving spouse of the decedent. It must further be noted that in said agreement although the decedent waives all right which he might have in her estate, no similar right is waived by her.

The courts have consistently held that the execution of a separation agreement by mutual consent bars and precludes the conclusion that there was any abandonment on the part of either spouse. *(Matter of Maiden,*284 N. Y. 429, 431; *Matter of Stolz,,*145 Misc. 799; *Matter of Brown,*202 Misc. 820.)

*707Abandonment has been defined as a desertion of the one spouse by the other without consent. Thus even if the surviving spouse had abandoned her husband in 1922 the execution of the separation agreement in 1924 would preclude the decedent from obtaining a decree of separation on that ground. The allegations of adultery contained in the answering affidavits raise no issue. As so well stated by Surrogate Dblehartty in *Matter of Green*(155 Misc. 641, 645): “Unfaithfulness *per se*is not a bar. Cruelty and inhumanity alone do not bar. Conduct endangering the life and health of a spouse does not bar. Only ‘ abandonment ’ is a bar. ’ ’ Unless such adultery or abandonment had been determined by a court of record and had resulted in a decree of divorce or separation the widow’s right of election is not affected. (Decedent Estate Law, § 18, subd. 3.) The court, therefore, finds that there is no triable issue before it and the motion for summary judgment is granted.

Submit order accordingly.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4598 

To amend the Small Business Act to require public communications about 

disaster assistance resources to be made in multiple languages. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2017 

Ms. MENG (for herself, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. SOTO, and Miss GONZA ́LEZCOLO ́N of Puerto Rico) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to require public communications about disaster assistance resources to be made 

in multiple languages. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT FOR PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 

4 ABOUT DISASTER ASSISTANCE RESOURCES 

5 TO BE MADE IN MULTIPLE LANGUAGES. 

6 Section 7(b)(5) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

7 636(b)(5)) is amended by inserting ‘‘in multiple lan8 guages,’’ after ‘‘web-based outlets,’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 21 to Buckhead America Corporation
                                    December 31, 1996 Form 10-KSB


                          BUCKHEAD AMERICA CORPORATION
                            (A Delaware Corporation)

                              SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
                             As of December 31, 1996


                              Delaware Corporations
                              ---------------------

                               BLM Virginia, Inc.
                                 BLM Prime, Inc.
                            CHI - Sandy Springs, Inc.
                                   BLM-I, Inc.
                           BAC Hotel Management, Inc.
                             BLM CMO Holdings, Inc.
                              BLM EB Orlando, Inc.
                                  BLM EB, Inc.
                               BLM EB Miami, Inc.
                              BLM EB Daytona, Inc.
                                   BLM-F, Inc.
                                  BLM-RH, Inc.
                                  BLM-RF, Inc.
                              BAC Franchising Inc.


                                 Delaware Trust
                                 --------------

                             Days Inn Mortgage Trust


                                Texas Corportion
                                ----------------

                         Country Hearth Inns/Texas, Inc.


                               Georgia Corporation
                               -------------------

                       Country Hearth Inns - Dalton, Inc.


                                      75
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.1

          AMENDMENT TO JANUARY 20, 2005 PROMISSORY NOTE AND REVOLVING
                 LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN PIVX SOLUTIONS, INC. AND
                          ROB SHIVELY AND GEOFF SHIVELY

This addendum, effective as of April 3, 2005, modifies the Promissory Note and
Revolving Loan Agreement entered into by Rob Shively and Geoff Shively, and PivX
Solutions, Inc. ("PivX") on January 20, 2005.

The modifications are intended to change the repayment provisions of the
Promissory Note and Revolving Loan Agreement and are as follows:

PivX Solutions will pay to Rob Shively a total of $355,000 at 0% interest for a
twenty four month term beginning on May 15, 2005, and the 15th of every month
thereafter. Each installment payment will equal $14,792.

PivX Solutions will pay to Geoff Shively a total of $115,000 at 0% interest for
a twenty four month term beginning on May 15, 2005, and the 15th of every month
thereafter. Each installment payment will equal $4792.

Upon final payment under these revised terms, such debt by PivX Solutions to Rob
Shively and Geoff Shively will be fully paid for and discharged.

For consideration of these revised terms, Rob Shively and Geoff Shively
acknowledge that no other monies are owed to them by PivX Solutions, Inc.,
except for $14,331 in expenses incurred by the Shivelys in connection with
refurbishment of corporate housing.

Accepted and agreed:

                                            PivX Solutions, Inc.
By: /s/ Rob Shively
    -------------------------------
       Rob Shively

                                            By: /s/ Scott Olson
By: /s/ Geoff Shively                           --------------------------------
    -------------------------------
       Geoff Shively
                                            Title: General Counsel and Secretary
                                                   -----------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 5, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 29, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 168 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-157, CP2024-163.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-29017 Filed 1-4-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, James W. Dennis, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of HealtheTech, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HealtheTech, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designated under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 9, 2004
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1566]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    OUR UNCONSCIONABLE NATIONAL DEBT

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. MIKE COFFMAN

                              of colorado

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 19, 2012

  Mr. COFFMAN of Colorado. Mr. Speaker, on January 20, 2009, the day 
President Obama took office; the national debt was $ 
10,626,877,048,913.08.
  Today, it is $ 16,020,975,194,914.83. We've added 
$5,394,098,146,001.80 dollars to our debt in 3\1/2\ years. This is $5.3 
trillion in debt our nation, our economy, and our children could have 
avoided with a balanced budget amendment.

                          ____________________
```