alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6071]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following 
communication from the Speaker:

                                               Washington, DC,

                                               September 19, 2012.
       I hereby appoint the Honorable Steve Womack to act as 
     Speaker pro tempore on this day.
                                                  John A. Boehner,
     Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                          ____________________
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28934]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Secretary of Energy Advisory Board

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of open virtual meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 20, 2023, the Department of Energy published a 
notice of open meeting announcing a virtual meeting on January 16, 
2024, of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB). This notice 
announces the cancellation of this virtual meeting.

DATES: The virtual meeting scheduled for January 16, 2024, announced in 
the December 20, 2023, issue of the Federal Register (FR Doc. 2023-
27904, 88 FR 88057), is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Borak, Designated Federal 
Officer, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, 
Washington, DC 20585; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b7c4d2d6d5f7dfc699d3d8d299d0d8c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a190f0b082a021b440e050f440d051c">[email protected]</span></a>; telephone: (202) 586-
5216.

Signing Authority

    This document of the Department of Energy was signed on December 
27, 2023, by David Borak, Deputy Committee Management Officer, 
Secretarial Office of Boards & Councils, pursuant to delegated 
authority from the Secretary of Energy. That document with the original 
signature and date is maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes 
only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal 
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been 
authorized to sign and submit the document in electronic format for 
publication, as an official document of the Department of Energy. This 
administrative process in no way alters the legal effect of this 
document upon publication in the Federal Register.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on December 28, 2023.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2023-28934 Filed 1-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, to
such officers knowledge, that:

The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|                         |  |        |                    |                        
|------------------------ |  | ------ | ------------------ | -----------------------
|Dated: February 27, 2004 |  |        | /s/ James P. Bryce
|                         |  |       
|                         |  | Name:  |                    | James P. Bryce         
|                         |  | Title: |                    | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Report.
# Walker - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Regional Planning Commission of Greater Birmingham Executive Director Charles Ball Email &#x63;b&#x61;&#108;l&#x40;&#114;&#x70;&#99;g&#x62;&#46;&#x6f;&#114;gThe post Regional Planning Commission of Greater Birmingham appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2008158EN.01002801.xml

| 21.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/28

---

Action brought on 8 April 2008 — Tsarnavas v Commission

(Case F-44/08)

(2008/C 158/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Vassilios Tsarnavas (Glyfada, Greece) (represented by: N. Lhoëst)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the appointing authority rejecting the applicant's request for compensation of EUR 6 800 for the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage suffered in consequence of breaches of procedure or wrongful acts in the performance of public duties by the Commission in the promotion years 1998 and 1999, and an order that the Commission pay that sum.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the appointing authority of 14 August 2007 rejecting the applicant's request for compensation of EUR 6 800 for the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage suffered in consequence of breaches of procedure or wrongful acts in the performance of public duties by the Commission in the promotion years 1998 and 1999; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the appointing authority of 14 August 2007 rejecting the applicant's request for compensation of EUR 6 800 for the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage suffered in consequence of breaches of procedure or wrongful acts in the performance of public duties by the Commission in the promotion years 1998 and 1999;

| — | So far as necessary, annul the implicit decision of the Commission rejecting the complaint brought by the applicant on 14 November 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

So far as necessary, annul the implicit decision of the Commission rejecting the complaint brought by the applicant on 14 November 2007;

| — | Order the defendant to pay compensation of EUR 6 800 for the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage suffered in consequence of repeated breaches of procedure or wrongful acts in the performance of public duties by the Commission in the promotion years 1998 and 1999, in consequence of judgment of 19 March 2003 (Joined Cases T-188/01 and T-189/01); |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay compensation of EUR 6 800 for the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage suffered in consequence of repeated breaches of procedure or wrongful acts in the performance of public duties by the Commission in the promotion years 1998 and 1999, in consequence of judgment of 19 March 2003 (Joined Cases T-188/01 and T-189/01);

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
#### Ex parte OVERTURFF.

No. A-11861.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Jan. 7, 1953.

*507Jimmie. Whiteley, Tulsa, M. S. Simms, Sand Springs, for petitioner.

■ Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Fred Hansen, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles E. Steele, County Atty., Okmulgee County, Okmulgee, and O. E. Richeson, Asst. County Atty., Okmulgee County, Henryetta, for respondent.

POWELL, Judge.

The defendant below, petitioner here, Thelma Overturff, was charged and convicted in the Superior Court of Okmulgee County, Henryetta Division, for the crime of public drunkenness, second and subsequent conviction, under Title 37 O.S.1951 § 12; and was sentenced to serve a term of two. years in the State Penitentiary. ■The sentence was suspended but subsequently revoked and the defendant ordered incarcerated under the original judgment and sentence. The defendant has applied for a writ of habeas corpus, seeking release from imprisonment.

This is a companion case of Ex parte Barnett, Okl.Cr.App., 252 P.2d 496, was argued along with said case, and the same assignments of error are presented" in this case.

For the reasons stated in-the opinion in the case of Ex parte Barnett, supra, the conviction of the defendant below, petitioner herein, in the Superior Court of Okmulgee County, sitting at Henryetta, is hereby set aside, the judgment and sentence entered is found to be null and void, and said Thelma Overturff is hereby ordered released from the sentence and judgment imposed.

BRETT, P. J., and JONES, J., concur.
# C_2010221EN.01003802.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2010 — Kerstens v Commission

(Case T-266/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff case - Officials - Change of posting - Article 7 of the Staff Regulations - Interests of the service - Distortion of facts and evidence - Obligation on the Civil Service Tribunal to state reasons - Rights of the defence)

2010/C 221/61

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Petrus Kerstens (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and M. G. Berscheid, agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 8 May 2008 in Case F-119/06 Kerstens v Commission seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Kerstens

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders Petrus Kerstens to bear his own costs as well as the costs incurred by the Commission in the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Petrus Kerstens to bear his own costs as well as the costs incurred by the Commission in the appeal proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.9.2008.

1

---
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2013-0835

 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM095AD

8-28-35, RC --- 1/14/13

8-28-36, RC ---10/7/09

8-28-39, RB ---8/19/09

8-28-41, RB ---8/8/12

8-28-42, RA ---10/1/08

8-28-43, RA --- 6/25/09

8-28-44, RB ---7/25/09

8-28-47 ---5/2/08

8-28-48, RA ---7/27/12

8-28-49, RA ---7/23/12

8-28-52 ---11/3/09

8-28-55 ---7/23/12

8-28-56 ---7/23/12

8-28-58 ---7/25/11

8-57-44, RD ---10/8/08

CREDIT

8-28-53 ---11/3/08

8-28-49 --- 10/1/10

8-28-48 --- 10/1/10

8-28-43 --- 8/10/06

8-28-41, RA --- 4/11/07

8-28-44, RA --- 11/15/06

8-28-44 --- 8/9/06

8-28-39, RA --- 3/15/07

MODSUM 8Q101511, RC --- 1/30/09

MODSUM 8Q101513, RD --- 8/16/06

MODSUM 8Q101652, RF --- 3/10/11

MODSUM 8Q101865, RB --- 5/26/08

MODSUM 8Q101907, RB --- 9/10/10

MODSUM 8Q101908, RB --- 9/10/10

MODSUM 8Q101916, RA --- 10/19/10

MODSUM 8Q901117, RC --- 3/23/09

MODSUM 8Q902064, RG --- 3/10/11

MODSUM 8Q902091, RC --- 12/22/06

MODSUM 8Q902122, RF --- 12/8/11

MODSUM 8Q902144, RE --- 6/17/09

MODSUM 8Q902382, RB --- 9/10/10

MODSUM 8Q902383, RB --- 9/10/10
CR 828CH00020, I9 --- 1/17/08

CR 828CH00027, I17 --- 4/20/06

CR 828CH00029, I2 --- 11/22/94

CR 828CH00044, I2 --- 12/8/97

CR 828SO00006, I24 --- 3/6/97

SOO 8061, I42 --- 6/5/03

SOO 8061, I41 --- 3/14/01

SOO 8062, I15 --- 1/6/86

SOO 8098, I16 --- 5/29/90

SOO 8099, I9 --- 1/7/86

SOO 8155, I48 --- 1/19/07

SOO 8155, I46 --- 2/17/00

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### Charles SHEPPARD, Plaintiff in Error, v. Curtis HALL and Ernest Bartlett, Defendants in Error.

No. 36317.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

April 6, 1955.

*215Appeal from the District Court of Custer County; W. P. Keen, Judge.

Action by Curtis Hall against Ernest Bartlett and Charles Sheppard for damage to automobile. Judgment for the plaintiff against defendant Sheppard and for the defendant Bartlett. Sheppard appeals. Affirmed.

Pierce, Mock & Duncan and James W. Shepherd, Jr., Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Meacham, Meacham, Meacham & Meach-am, Clinton, for defendant in error, Curtis Hall.

HALLEY, Justice.

This appeal involves the identical question of fact and law involved in Sheppard v. Hall, Old., 282 P.2d 212, this day promulgated. The conclusions therein reached are applicable and controlling here.

Judgment affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and CORN, DAVISON, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.
Prepared and filed by St Ives Burrups





	EXHIBIT 10.27



EMILY SWENSON. In regards to the
    Employment Letter between Emily Swenson and WRC Media Inc., as of October
    15, 2003, Ms. Swenson’s title is President of Weekly Reader with a base
    salary of $225,000, payable in accordance with Weekly Reader’s
    customary practices, with an annual, non-discretionary incentive payout up
    to 50% of her base salary based on successful attainment of financial
    goals approved by the Board of Directors. Ms. Swenson is also eligible, based
    on her performance, for a discretionary bonus of up to 25% of her base
    salary. Ms. Swenson is entitled to 20 days of paid vacation per year and
    the other benefits
    to
which comparably-situated executives are entitled. Ms. Swenson is entitled to
    severance equal to 12 months of her then current base salary, plus any non-discretionary
    bonuses earned pro-rated for that portion of the calendar year for which
she was employed.

141
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (the Company) for the period
ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Curtis L. Dinan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Curtis L. Dinan                    
|Curtis L. Dinan Chief Financial
Officer

February 28, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to ONEOK Partners, L.P. and will be retained by ONEOK Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6061]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. MORAN:
        H.R. 6422.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, section 8 of the Constitution of the United 
     States grants Congress the authority to enact this 
     legislation.
```
# C_2008327EN.01002702.xml

| 20.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/27

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 24 September 2008 — Van Neyghem v Commission

(Case T-105/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff cases - Dismissal of the action at first instance - Recruitment - Open competition - Non-admission to the oral tests - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

(2008/C 327/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Kris Van Neyghem (Vissenaken, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and B. Eggers, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2007 in Case F-73/06 Van Neyghem v Commission [2007], not yet published in the ECR, seeking annulment of that judgment.

Van Neyghem

Commission

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Kris Van Neyghem is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission in the context of the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Kris Van Neyghem is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission in the context of the appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 107, 26.4.2008.

1

---
# Schuyler - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Southern Tier Central Regional Planning and Development Board Executive Director Chelsea Robertson Email cr&#111;&#98;&#101;&#x72;&#x74;&#x73;&#x6f;n&#64;&#115;&#116;&#99;&#x70;&#x6c;&#x61;&#x6e;ni&#110;&#103;&#46;&#x6f;&#x72;&#x67;The post Southern Tier Central Regional Planning and Development Board appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 463 

To prohibit United States Government recognition of Russia’s annexation 

of Crimea. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2017 

Mr. CONNOLLY (for himself and Mr. CHABOT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit United States Government recognition of 

Russia’s annexation of Crimea. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Crimea Annexation 

5 Non-recognition Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST UNITED STATES RECOGNI7 TION OF RUSSIA’S ANNEXATION OF CRIMEA. 

8 (a) STATEMENT OF POLICY.—It is the policy of the 

9 United States not to recognize the de jure or de facto sovVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:31 Jan 24, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H463.IH H463

smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 463 IH

1 ereignty of the Russian Federation over Crimea, its air2 space, or its territorial waters. 

3 (b) PROHIBITION.—In accordance with subsection 

4 (a), no Federal department or agency may take any action 

5 or extend any assistance that recognizes or implies rec6 ognition of the de jure or de facto sovereignty of the Rus7 sian Federation over Crimea, its airspace, or its territorial 

8 waters. 

9 (c) WAIVER.—The President may waive subsection 

10 (a) or (b) if the President determines that it is vital to 

11 the national security interests of the United States to do 

12 so. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
# C_2008116EN.01003203.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/32

---

Action brought on 7 February 2008 — Behmer v Parliament

(Case F-16/08)

(2008/C 116/61)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Joachim Behmer (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decisions of the appointing authority to award the applicant two merit points for the years 2004 and 2006.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decisions of the appointing authority to award the applicant two merit points for the years 2004 and 2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions of the appointing authority to award the applicant two merit points for the years 2004 and 2006;

| — | Order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

---
# C_2008171EN.01004601.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/46

---

Action brought on 16 May 2008 — Tay Za v Council

(Case T-181/08)

(2008/C 171/87)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pye Phyo Tay Za (Yangoon, Myanmar) (represented by: D. Anderson QC, M. Lester, Barrister and G. Martin, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | The annulment of Regulation 194/2008 of 25 February 2008, as a whole or in so far as it concerns the applicant; and |
| --- | --- |

—

The annulment of Regulation 194/2008 of 25 February 2008, as a whole or in so far as it concerns the applicant; and

| — | order that the Council pays the applicant's costs for this action. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the Council pays the applicant's costs for this action.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks annulment of Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 (1) in so far as it applies to him for four reasons:

1

First, the applicant contends that the regulation has no proper legal basis. He submits to this end that neither Article 60 EC nor Article 301 EC gives the Council the power to freeze the entirety of a person's funds who is not connected with the military regime of Burma/Myanmar. Second, the applicant claims that the regulation infringes the obligation to state reasons on the basis of Article 253 EC. Namely, the applicant claims that the regulation does not provide any reasons why the applicant has been included in Part J of Annex VI of the said regulation which lists members of the Burmese government and people associated with it. Also, the Common Position No 2006/318/CFSP (2) requiring Member States to prevent the applicant form entering into and transiting through their territories does allegedly not provide any reasons either for the applicant's inclusion in the list, but simply includes him in a list under a heading ‘Persons who benefit from Government Economic Policies’. Third, the applicant submits that the regulation infringes his fundamental rights, since it allegedly interferes in a disproportionate manner with his rights to peaceful enjoyment of his property, to a fair hearing and to effective legal protection. Fourth, according to the applicant the regulation infringes the principle of proportionality.

2

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 of 25 February 2008 renewing and strengthening the restrictive measures in respect of Burma/Myanmar and repealing Regulation (EC) No 817/2006 (OJ 2008 L 66, p. 1).

1

(2)  Council Common Position No 2006/318/CFSP of 27 April 2006 renewing restrictive measures against Burma/Myanmar (OJ 2006 L 116, p. 77) extended until 30 April 2009 by Council Common Position 2008/349/CFSP of 29 April 2008 (OJ 2008 L 116, p. 57).

2

---