alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23
**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**
We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements of Manugistics Group, Inc.and its subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File Nos.  333-32172,333-36983, 333-52630, 333-60439, 333-62993, 333-68324, 33-98820,33-67994, and 33-89492) Form S-3(File Nos.  333-53918, 333-55010, 333-66104, 333-100627, and 333-31949) and Form S-4(File No.  333-48952) of our report datedMarch 27, 2003, (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to theadoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, *“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,”*effective January 1, 2002), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Manugistics Group, Inc. andits subsidiaries for the year ended February 28, 2003.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
McLean, VAMay 27, 2003
EXHIBIT 10.3


 


SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION


 


Directors
whose principal occupation is other than employment with the Company will be
compensated in cash at the rate of $20,000 per year plus $2,000 for each
meeting of the Board of Directors and each committee meeting attended in person
and $1,000 for each meeting attended by telephone.  The Chairman of the Board will receive
additional compensation in the amount of $12,000 per month.  Each committee chairman will receive an
annual fee of $5,000, except the Chairman of the Audit Committee will receive
an annual fee of $7,500.  The directors
will also be reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred to attend
meetings.


 


Furthermore, each director who is not an officer or employee of the
Company will be eligible to participate in the Stewart & Stevenson
Services, Inc. 1996 Director Stock Plan (the “1996 Plan”) which was filed
with the Commission on September 1, 2004, as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s
Registration Statement of Form S-8 (File No. 333-118742).  Under the 1996 Plan, the eligible directors
will receive, on the date of the 2005 Annual Meeting, (i) the number of
shares of the Company’s Common Stock determined by dividing (A) the sum of
$15,000 by (B) the fair market value of a share of the Company’s Common
Stock, and (ii) options to purchase 5,000 shares of the Company’s Common
Stock.


 


1
CORRECTED COPY

The FAA is reissuing the letter dated July 2 nd . A correction was made to add the “What You

Should Do” section. Below is the l etter that includes the change. We made the correction in

our records as of July 6, 2015.

July 2 , 2015

Mr. Andrew Pena

3513 North Gravel Circle

Southlake, TX 76092

Dear Mr. Pena :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your March 30 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0833 ),

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does no t

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the ext ent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process yo ur request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

B rittany Newton

Program Analyst , Airm en and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LIFESCAN, INC.; JOHNSON &

JOHNSON,

 Plaintiffs - Appellees,

 v.

SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC;

CONDUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

PHARMATECH SOLUTIONS, INC.;

DECISION DIAGNOSTICS, CORP.,

 Defendants - Appellants.

No. 13-16042

D.C. No. 3:12-cv-06360-JST

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 3, 2013

San Francisco, California

Before: TROTT, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Defendants appeal the district court’s order granting plaintiffs’ request for

preliminary injunctive relief, enjoining defendants from using images of plaintiffs’

FILED

JAN 08 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
products on defendants’ Shasta GenStrip packaging and in its advertising. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in granting

preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude that the district court properly

exercised its discretion. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008)

(listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press

Int’l, Inc., 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of

review).

AFFIRMED.
ADDRESSING ECONOMIC CHALLENGES IN 

APPALACHIA’S COAL-IMPACTED COMMUNITIES

GEORGIA

SOUTH 

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

TENNESSEE

KENTUCKY

OHIO PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

VIRGINIA

NEW YORK

WEST

VIRGINIA

Appalachian Regional Commission, March 2017

Data Source: U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration

Change in Coal Mine

Employment by County,

2011-2016

Numeric Change

100 to 422

0 to 99

-499 to -1

-3,265 to -500

0 100 50

Miles

GEORGIA

SOUTH 

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

TENNESSEE

KENTUCKY

OHIO PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

VIRGINIA

NEW YORK

WEST

VIRGINIA

Appalachian Regional Commission, June 2017

0 100 50

Miles

Counties Served 

by ARC’s POWER 

Investments

According to ARC research, Appalachia lost a total of 33,500 coal mining jobs between 2011 and 2016,

representing 82 percent of America’s job losses in this sector. While coal mining job losses are spread

across the Region, the highest concentration of these losses is in the Central Appalachian coalfields of

Kentucky and West Virginia. The Appalachian Regional Commission has now invested a total of over 

$92 million specifically to diversify the economy in 250 coal-impacted counties across 11 Appalachian

states. Together these investments are projected to create or retain almost 8,600 jobs, benefit more than

25,400 workers and students, and leverage an additional $206 million into the Region’s economy. 

June 2017
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5709]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mrs. EMERSON:
       H.R. 6312.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.38

                            ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                 COMPENSATION PROGRAM FOR NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
                             EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2003

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                  PROGRAM ELEMENT                                                       DESCRIPTION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                        <C>
Sign-on grant for new directors                            Continue with current program of grant of stock with a value equal
                                                           to $120,000, vesting monthly over 36 months from the date of grant.
                                                           Such stock may not be sold until after the recipient has ceased to
                                                           be a board member.

Annual cash retainer                                       $35,000

Board meeting fees                                         $2,000 or $1,000 if by telephone

Committee meeting fees                                     $1,000 or $500 if by telephone, when such meeting is as a meeting of
-- Audit                                                   the committee
-- Compensation
-- Nominating and
    Governance(A)

Committee membership annual retainer                       $5,000
-- Audit                                                   $5,000
-- Compensation

Committee chairman annual retainer                         Audit: $10,000 for chairman; $10,000 for designated financial
-- Audit                                                   expert (if not the chairman).
-- Compensation                                            Compensation: $7,500

Annual stock option grant (including Black-Scholes         Granted on 4/1/03 - 25,000 stock options for fiscal year ending
expected value                                             3/31/04 at an exercise price of $5.05, vesting monthly from date of
                                                           grant to end of fiscal year. Future grants of stock and or stock
Annual restricted stock award                              options to be determined after review of current practices and
                                                           approval of new stock option plan by shareholders.

Fees for special project work                              None in U.S.
                                                           $5,000 per assignment out of the country.

Additional annual cash retainer for future position        To be determined at time of election.
of Lead Director                                           Dependent on required involvement.
</TABLE>

(A)   Nominating Committee comprises all non-employee directors and receives
only committee meeting fees, when such a meeting is convened as a meeting of the
Nominating Committee.

                                                                               8
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**GREGORY SAMUELS,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 446 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 16th day of November, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION(1)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted),
Reynolds C. Bish, the Chief Executive Officer of Captiva Software Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered
by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 26, 2003



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/    REYNOLDS C.
BISH                 
|Reynolds C. Bish Chief Executive Officer

---

|(1) |  | This Certification accompanies the Report in accordance with § 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 and shall
not be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Company and will be retained by Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2013164EN.01002402.xml

| 8.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/24

---

Order of the General Court of 17 April 2013 — vwd Vereinigte Wirtschaftsdienste v Commission

(Case T-353/08) (1)

1

2013/C 164/41

Language of the case: German

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 22.11.2008.

1

---
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 9:40 AM

To: 'travis@travisjaybrown.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Information: SkyVue Technologies, LLC (Docket No.
FAA-2015-1087)



### August 17, 2015

Dear Mr. Brown:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-1087). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, S ection 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operat ion please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by August 31, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
<PAGE>   1
                                    EXHIBIT
                                       23


                                   P.63 of 66
<PAGE>   2
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-39794, No. 33-96604, No. 333-29643 and No.
333-29647) of Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp. of our reports dated
February 7, 2001, except for certain information in Note 9 as to which the date
is February 20, 2001, relating to the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedules which appear in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 30, 2001
# C_2008285EN.01001302.xml

| 8.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/13

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 June 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des Landes Oberösterreich (Austria)) — Marc André Kurt v Bürgermeister der Stadt Wels

(Case C-104/08) (1)

1

(Articles 92(1) and 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Fundamental freedoms - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Condition of diploma provided for by the national legislation for the issue of a permit to operate a driving school - Discrimination against own nationals as compared to nationals of other Member States)

(2008/C 285/22)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des Landes Oberösterreich

Parties

Applicant: Marc André Kurt

Applicant:

Defendant: Bürgermeister der Stadt Wels

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des Landes Oberösterreich — Interpretation of the fundamental principles of the EC and EU Treaties and the fundamental freedoms thereunder, as well as Articles 16 and 20 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — National legislation establishing a permit system for establishing, operating and managing a driving school and providing for a diploma requirement — Discrimination against own nationals as compared to nationals of other Member States who avail themselves of their rights under Community law and who do not necessarily have to satisfy the diploma requirement

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Articles 23 EC, 43 EC and 49 EC do not preclude legislation of a Member State which, in a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, refuses to recognise professional qualifications acquired by a national of that Member State as equivalent to the possession of the diploma required by that legislation for the purposes of operating a driving school as an independent operator in that Member State. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Articles 23 EC, 43 EC and 49 EC do not preclude legislation of a Member State which, in a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, refuses to recognise professional qualifications acquired by a national of that Member State as equivalent to the possession of the diploma required by that legislation for the purposes of operating a driving school as an independent operator in that Member State.

| 2. | The Court of Justice of the European Communities clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the second and third questions referred by the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des Landes Oberösterreich. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Court of Justice of the European Communities clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the second and third questions referred by the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des Landes Oberösterreich.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 7.6.2008.

1

---
GEORGIA

Xena Bunce

Ella Pader

KENTUCKY

Sarah Adams

Lindsay Baker

MARYLAND

Tessa Hoppe

NEW YORK

Logan Ives

Abigail McKenna

Harrycel Osha Mabilog

OHIO

Addison Shaffer

Alexis Sommers

Julia Weber

Owen White

PENNSYLVANIA

Sara Parker

Madison Reams

TENNESSEE

Jiarui Han

Samuel Oakes

Amelia Terry

VIRGINIA

Chloe Vaughn

WEST VIRGINIA

Melanie Jimmerson

PARTICIPANTS

Appalachian Regional Commission, July 2020 LEARN MORE: arc.gov/aea
**Exhibit 31.1****Certifications for Form 10-Q**I, Curtis S. Reis, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Alliance Bancshares California;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a—15(e) and15d—15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 10, 2007 Name:  /s/ Curtis S. Reis   Title:      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer