alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been 

appealed to the Supreme Court: 

 

1. Michael Dwayne Ferguson 

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia 

 Record No. 0060-19-3 

 Opinion rendered by Judge Beales on 

 February 25, 2020 

2. Antonio Jones 

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia 

 Record No. 1929-18-3 

 Opinion rendered by Chief Judge Decker on 

 March 10, 2020 

3. Justin Leon Walker 

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia 

 Record No. 1945-18-1 

 Opinion rendered by Judge Russell on 

 March 24, 2020 

4. Melanie Vandyke 

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia 

 Record No. 1322-18-2 

 Opinion rendered by Chief Judge Decker on 

 March 31, 2020 

5. Robert Meredith Otey, Jr. 

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia 

 Record No. 0556-19-2 

 Opinion rendered by Judge AtLee on 

 April 7, 2020 

6. Natalie Marie Keepers 

 v. Commonwealth of Virginia 

 Record No. 0279-19-3 

 Opinion rendered by Judge O’Brien on 

 April 14, 2020 
 The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been 

disposed of by the Supreme Court: 

1. Loudoun County 

 v. Michael Richardson 

 Record No. 1533-18-4 

 Opinion rendered by Judge O’Brien 

 on April 16, 2019 

 Judgment of Court of Appeals affirmed by opinion rendered on May 7, 2020 

 (190621) 

2. Andre Washington 

 v. Caroline County Department of Social Services 

 Record No. 0870-19-2 

 Opinion rendered by Judge Malveaux 

 on December 10, 2019 

 Refused (200023)
Description of Bonus Plans for Executive Officers for Fiscal Year 2004 and 2005



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
  
 Description of Bonus Plans for Executive Officers for Fiscal Year 2004 and Fiscal Year 2005 
  
 Executive officers are eligible for annual performance-based awards under
Broadwing Corporation’s (the “Company”) bonus plans for fiscal year 2004 and for fiscal year 2005. The bonus plans pay out a portion of the annual cash compensation of each executive officer contingent upon the Company’s
financial performance, as well as an assessment of individual performance. For fiscal year 2004, performance goals were weighted 25 percent for meeting individual objectives, 60 percent for meeting corporate cash EBITDA goals and 15 percent for
meeting corporate revenue goals. For fiscal year 2005, performance goals are weighted 25 percent for meeting individual objectives, 60 percent for meeting corporate cash EBITDA goals and 15 percent for meeting corporate revenue goals. The
Compensation Committee of the Company intends to approve an executive bonus plan for each year for the foreseeable future. Typically, executive cash bonuses are awarded during the first quarter of each year based on the performance of the Company
during the prior year.
Exhibit 10.16


 


 


SERVICES
ACQUISITION CORP. INTERNATIONAL


401
East Olas Boulevard, Suite 1140


Fort
Lauderdale, FL 33301


 


 


 


 




	
   

  	
  March 29, 2005

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  Mercantile Companies, Inc.

  
	
  1372 Shermer Road

  
	
  Northbrook, IL 60062

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  Gentlemen:

  






 


 


This letter will confirm our
agreement that, commencing on the effective date (“Effective Date”) of the
registration statement for the initial public offering (“IPO”) of the
securities of Services Acquisition Corp. International (“SACI”) and continuing
until (the “Termination Date”) the earlier of the consummation by SACI of a “Business
Combination” or SACI’s liquidation (as described in SACI’s IPO prospectus),
Mercantile Companies, Inc. shall make available to SACI certain office and
secretarial services as may be required by SACI from time to time, situated at
1372 Shermer Road, Northbrook, IL 60062. 
In exchange therefor, SACI shall pay Mercantile Companies, Inc. the sum
of $2,625 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter
until the Termination Date.


 


 


 


	
   

  	
  Very truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  SERVICES ACQUISITION CORP. INTERNATIONAL

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Thomas E. Aucamp

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:  Thomas E. Aucamp

  
	
   

  	
  Title:    Vice President

  
						



 


 


 


 


 


	
  AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  MERCANTILE COMPANIES, INC.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ I. Steven
  Edelson

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name: I. Steven
  Edelson

  	
   

  
	
  Title: President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dennis Harris, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Beerman, J.), rendered December 9, 1988, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record does not support the defendant’s contention that the arresting officer’s testimony lacked the specificity necessary to enable the hearing court to decide the issue of probable cause. The description of the perpetrators relayed by the undercover officer to his backup team, one of whom arrested the defendant on the scene within minutes of the narcotics transaction, was sufficiently detailed to provide probable cause to believe that the defendant was one of the individuals who committed the crime *(see, People v Erazo,*134 AD2d 610). Moreover, the prompt on-the-scene showup identification of the defendant by the undercover officer was consistent with good police procedure *(see, People v Erazo, supra; People v Marrero,*110 AD2d 785). Mangano, P. J., Hooper, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 4- 18 90

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Ja y Drie se n, Ru st ic Hom e Bu il de rs LLC ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt
v. Mi ch ael J. Sm it h; Marg aretA. Sm it h; Ste ve n G. Hau ga ard ; Ca dwe ll , San fo rd , Deib ert& Garry, L LP; St ep he n Lan do n; Bret t Lo vr ie n; Mi ch ael A. Hend ers on ; Ja m es S. Simko ; Pe te r Ben do rf; Ji m Loup; So ut h Dak ot a Uni fie d J ud ic ia l Syste m ; Mo od y Co un ty Clerk ; Li ll ia n R el f; Li saJo hn so n, Dep ut y Cle rk ; Dav idR. Gien ap p, Ho no rab le ; Ti m D. Tuck er, Ho no rab le ; Dav idGil be rts on , Chi ef J us ti ce; Jo hn K. Kon en ka m

p, J us ti ce; Ste ve n L. Zin te r, Ju st ic e; Glen A. Seve rs on , Ju st ic e; Lori S. W il bu r, Ju st ic e; Ru th Koo im a; Mi ch ael J. J aco bs m a; Jo hn M. Mu rray; Io wa Ju dic ia l Br an ch ; D on E
. Co ur tne y ; Jam es D
. Sc ott ; Je ff

re y L
. Poul so n, Hon or ab le ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es Oth er Po ss ib le Defen da nt s, Un kn own at t hi s t im e

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t BradVan Heu ve le n ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e North ern Dis tri ctof I owa- Sio ux Cit y

__ __ __ __ __ __Subm it te d: Nov em be r 24 , 20 14 Fi le d: Nov em

be r 28 , 20 14 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re GRUENDER, BENTON, andKELLY , Cir cu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM. Ja y Drie se n ap pe al s th e di st ric t co urt’s di s m is sa l of hi s ci vi l co m pl ai nt 1 as se rti ng th at hi s rig ht s were vi ol at ed in co nn ect io n wit h pr io r s t a t e -co urt pr oc eed in gs . Upo n care fu l de no vo rev ie w, we ag ree w i th th e di stric t co urt th at it la ck ed subjec t m at te r juri sd ic ti on . See Mi nc h Fam il y LLL P v. Bu ffal o- Red Ri ve r W at ers he d Dis t., 62 8 F.3 d 96 0, 96 5 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ) (d e no vo st an da rd of rev ie w). W e al so co nc lu de th at th e di stric t co urt di d no t ab us e it s di sc ret io n in de nyin g Drie se n’s reque st fo r le av e to am en d hi s co m pl ai nt
. See Horras v. Am
. Cap it al Strat eg ie s, Ltd ., 72 9 F.3 d 79 8, 80 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 13 ) (d is tri ct co urt ha s co ns id erab le di sc ret io n to de ny po st -jud gm en t m ot io n fo r le av e to am en d) , cert . den ie d, 1 34 S. Ct. 1 34 6 (2 01 4)
. Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Mark W
. Ben ne tt , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 North ern Dis tri ctof I owa . -2
-
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4803 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4803

To clarify the treatment of State and local real property taxes paid in 
                      2017 and assessed for 2018.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2018

 Mr. Lance (for himself, Mr. Gottheimer, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. 
 Frelinghuysen, Mr. LoBiondo, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. King of New York, Mr. 
Zeldin, Mr. Faso, and Mr. Donovan) introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To clarify the treatment of State and local real property taxes paid in 
                      2017 and assessed for 2018.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SALT Prepayment Deductibility Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF STATE AND LOCAL REAL PROPERTY TAXES PAID IN 2017 
              AND ASSESSED FOR 2018.

    Amounts paid in calendar year 2017 with respect to real property 
taxes assessed for calendar year 2018 shall not fail to be treated for 
purposes of section 164 as paid or accrued within calendar year 2017.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2009006EN.01004101.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/41

---

Action brought on 14 November 2008 — Earle Beauty v OHIM (SUPERSKIN)

(Case T-486/08)

(2009/C 6/80)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant(s): Liz Earle Beauty Co. Ltd (formerly Liz Earle Cosmetics Ltd.) (Ryde, United Kingdom) (represented by M. Cover, solicitor)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 September 2008 in case R 1656/2007-4 and declare that the Community trade mark concerned (application No 5 967 856) proceed to application and registration; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 September 2008 in case R 1656/2007-4 and declare that the Community trade mark concerned (application No 5 967 856) proceed to application and registration; and

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘SUPERSKIN’ for goods and services in classes 3, 5 and 44 — application No 5 967 856

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Rejection of the application

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal erred in its finding that the trade mark concerned is descriptive of the characteristics of the goods or services for which registration is sought.

Pleas in law:

---
EXHIBIT 23.1



Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 11, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Landrys Restaurants, Inc. (the Company) included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003 into the following:



|I. |  | The Companys Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-75886) relating to the Companys shelf registration statement.
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|II. |  | The Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-93173) relating to the Companys Amended and Restated 1995 Flexible Incentive Plan.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|III. |  | The Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-02862) relating to the Companys Stock Option Plan.
|---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|IV. |  | The Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-02854) relating to the 1995 Flexible Spending Plan.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|V. |  | The Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 033-81007) relating to the 1993 Stock Option Plan.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|VI. |  | The Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 033-76500) relating to the 1993 Stock Option Plan and Nonqualified Formula Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Houston, Texas

April 29, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4741 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4741

  To require the Postmaster General to designate a single, unique ZIP 
        code for particular communities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2018

  Mr. Zeldin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Postmaster General to designate a single, unique ZIP 
        code for particular communities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ZIP CODES.

    Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this section, 
the Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service shall 
designate a single, unique ZIP code for, as nearly as practicable, the 
communities of Flanders, Northampton, and Riverside in the Town of 
Southampton, New York.
                                 <all>
```
================================================================================

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Spirit,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and results of  operations
         of the Company.



Date:  May 12, 2006

                                               /s/ Peter Sotola
                                               ------------------------------
                                               Peter Sotola
                                               Secretary, Treasurer & C.F.O.
                                               (Principal Financial Officer and
                                               Principal Accounting Officer)
**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of                the                Company. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                               |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| By:                /s/ Michael S. McDevitt                                                         |   |   |        |
| Michael                S. McDevitt                                                                 |   |   |        |
| Chief                  Executive Officer, Chief Financial OfficerMarch                    16, 2007 |   |   |        |

----
ROSS MILLER
Secretary of State
204 North Carson Street, Ste. 1
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4299




	     Certificate of Amendment
      (PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 AND 78.390)

             Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
                         For Nevada Profit Corporations

1.	Name of Corporation:

           TheraBiogen, Inc.

2.	The articles have been amended as follows:

          Article 4 of the Articles of Incorporation is hereby amended so that
the first paragraph
          shall read as follows:

          The amount of the total authorized capital stock of this corporation
is
          $10,500 made up of 100,000,000 shares of common stock and 5,000,000
shares of
          preferred stock, each with a par value of one mill ($0.0001).  Such
shares are
          non-assessable.

3.	    The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation
entitling them to
    exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such greater
proportion of the voting
          power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or series,
or as may be required
          by the provisions of the articles of incorporation have voted in
favor of the amendment is
          98 percent.

4.	Effective date of filing : (optional)

5.	Signature: (required)

/s/ Robert Hipple
-------------------------
**EXHIBIT      13.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Annual Report of SQM on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December                31,                2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully                complies                with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange                Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents,                in all material respects, the financial condition and results of                operations of SQM. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----
** 
 

Exhibit 23

** 
 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-8 (No. 333-20539, No. 333-66347, No. 333-38346, No. 333-64054, No. 333-72466 andNo. 333-100309) and Form S-3 (No. 333-88011) of Wild Oats Markets, Inc. of our reportdated February 25, 2003, relating to the financial statements and financial statementschedule, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Denver, Colorado

March 24, 2003

 
 ****
# C_2009141EN.01004102.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/41

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 March 2009 — Alves dos Santos v Commission

(Case T-184/08) (1)

1

(European Social Fund - Training programmes - Reduction in the financial assistance initially granted - Application - Formal requirements - Manifest inadmissibility)

2009/C 141/85

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rui Manuel Alves dos Santos (Alvaiázere, Portugal) (represented by: A. Marques Fernandes, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Guerra e Andrade and B. Kotschy, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 4 March 2004, notified to Rui Manuel Alves dos Santos on 3 March 2008, reducing the amount of financial assistance granted by the European Social Fund (ESF) in respect of a vocational training programme submitted by the Portuguese authorities in file No 89 0488 P1

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Rui Manuel Alves dos Santos to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Rui Manuel Alves dos Santos to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 15.8.2008.

1

---