alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008128EN.01002301.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/23

---

Action brought on 6 March 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-106/08)

(2008/C 128/41)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Zavvos and N. Yerrell)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The Court is asked to:

| — | declare that, by failing to take all the measures necessary to ensure that vehicles put into service for the first time from 1 May 2006 must be fitted with recording equipment in accordance with the requirements of Annex IB to Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 and to issue the corresponding driver cards, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1)(a) and (2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2135/98, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to take all the measures necessary to ensure that vehicles put into service for the first time from 1 May 2006 must be fitted with recording equipment in accordance with the requirements of Annex IB to Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 and to issue the corresponding driver cards, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1)(a) and (2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2135/98, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006;

| — | order Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 2(2) of the Regulation states that ‘Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that they are able to issue driver cards at the latest on the 20th day following the day of publication of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006’.

Regulation No 561/2006 was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 11 April 2006 and it follows that the mandatory requirement of installation of a digital tachograph in all vehicles put into circulation in the European Union for the first time became applicable on 1 May 2006.

Official Journal of the European Union

The Hellenic Republic responded to the Commission's reasoned opinion on 30 May 2007 and explained to the Commission that, taking into account every possible delay completing the procedure, issue of the digital tachograph cards to drivers would be possible by the end of 2007.

The Hellenic Republic responded to the Commission's reasoned opinion on 30 May 2007 and explained to the Commission that, taking into account every possible delay in completing the procedure, issue of the digital tachograph cards to drivers would be possible by the end of 2007.

The Commission asks the Court to order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [245A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the extension of the Class III gaming compacts between two Tribes in California and the State of California.

# DATES:

The extension takes effect on January 8, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240,                         *IndianGaming@bia.gov;*                         (202) 219-4066.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

An extension to an existing Tribal-State Class III gaming compact does not require approval by the Secretary if the extension does not modify any other terms of the compact. 25 CFR 293.5. The following Tribes and the State of California have reached an agreement to extend the expiration date of their existing Tribal-State Class III gaming compacts to December 31, 2024: the Bishop Paiute Tribe; and the Pit River Tribe, California. This publication provides notice of the new expiration date of the compacts.

Bryan Newland,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2024-00107 Filed 1-5-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1353

KINGSLEY ANYANWUTAKU,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FLEET MORTGAGE GROUP, INCORPORATED; HOUSEHOLD

MORTGAGE SERVICES; SHAPIRO & BURSON; JOHN S.

BURSON; WILLIAM M. SAVAGE; RON BROWN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-99-1104-AW)

Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 28, 2000

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kingsley Anyanwutaku, Appellant Pro Se. Santiago Ricardo Narvaiz,

LAW OFFICES OF S. RICARDO NARVAIZ, Fairfax, Virginia; Peter Henrik

Gunst, ASTRACHAN, GUNST, GOLDMAN & THOMAS, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kingsley Anyanwutaku appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to Defendants in his suit challenging a

foreclosure. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Anyanwutaku v. Fleet

Mortgage Group, No. CA-99-1104-AW (D. Md. Feb. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
September 14, 2012 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks E1545 

began the Myers family lineage which has 

blessed us with descendants that have helped 

to shape our nation; and 

Whereas, the Myers Family has produced 

many well respected citizens and the patriarchs and matriarchs of the Myers family are 

pillars of strength that have touched many 

throughout our nation, family members of the 

past and present; and 

Whereas, in our beloved Fourth Congressional District of Georgia, we are honored to 

have members of the Myers family for they 

are some of our most beloved citizens in our 

District; and 

Whereas, family is one of the most honored 

and cherished institutions in the world, we 

take pride in knowing that families such as the 

Myers family have set aside this time to fellowship with each other, honor one another 

and to pass along history to each other by 

meeting at this year’s family reunion in DeKalb 

County, Georgia; and 

Whereas, the U.S. Representative of the 

Fourth District of Georgia has set aside this 

day to honor and recognize the Myers family; 

Now therefore, I, HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR. do hereby proclaim September 1, 

2012 as Myers Family Reunion Day in the 4th 

Congressional District of Georgia. 

Proclaimed, this 1st day of September, 

2012. 

f 

RECOGNIZING SEATTLE CHOCOLATES AS A FINALIST FOR THE 

2012 KING COUNTY EXECUTIVE’S 

SMALL BUSINESS AWARDS 

HON. ADAM SMITH OF WASHINGTON

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Friday, September 14, 2012 

Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I 

rise to honor and congratulate Seattle Chocolates in Tukwila, Washington for being named 

a finalist for the 2012 King County Executive’s 

Small Business Awards, in the Woman Small 

Business of the Year category. 

Seattle Chocolates was founded in 1992 by 

CEO Jean Thompson as a gourmet chocolate 

company that specializes in truffles and truffle 

bars. Their confections are carefully made with 

fine European chocolate in the King County 

region. 

The Woman Small Business of the Year 

award recognizes a women-owned business 

that has made significant contributions to the 

community and economy. Currently, 28.7 percent of businesses in the King County region 

are women-owned and operated. King County 

is also ranked one of the highest among U.S. 

counties for women-owned businesses. 

Mr. Speaker, it is with great pleasure that I 

honor Seattle Chocolates. Small businesses 

like Seattle Chocolates inspire women and 

create jobs. I commend Seattle Chocolates for 

representing our community and womenowned businesses all across the nation. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with REMARKS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1514]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      IN HONOR OF OHIO STATE REPRESENTATIVE NICHOLAS J. CELEBREZZE

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 13, 2012

  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in honor of State 
Representative Nicholas J. Celebrezze of Ohio's 15th House District.
  Representative Celebreeze graduated from the University of Akron in 
Ohio with a bachelor's degree with Honors from the Bliss Institute of 
American Politics. He later received his Juris Doctorate from the 
Cleveland Marshall College of Law. In 2004, he was admitted to practice 
law in Ohio. He currently owns and operates a local, family-owned law 
firm.
  Before being elected to the Ohio General Assembly, Representative 
Celebrezze was a Parma City Councilman for six years, chairing the 
Planning Committee which created a regional approach that led to $3.7 
million of improvements towards solving the City's long history of 
standing sewer problems. While on the Parma City Council, his 
background as a former Cuyahoga County Adult Probation Officer and 
Assistant County Prosecutor motivated him to advocate for a strong 
sense of community safety and to become involved in a successful 
campaign to build two new local fire stations.
  Now as a member of the Ohio House of Representatives, Representative 
Celebrezze sits on the Local Government and Transportation, Public 
Safety, and Homeland Security Committees. In addition to his 
legislative duties, Representative Celebrezze is also active in the 
community participating in Parma Jaycees, the Parma and Ohio Bar 
Associations, the North East Ohio City Council Association, the 
Justinian Forum, is the elected Chairman of the Partisan Ohio Sports 
Club, and was named the official color commentator for the local PACTV 
televised high school soccer games in 2011.
  Mr. Speaker and colleagues, please join me in honoring the 
achievements of State Representative Nicholas J. Celebrezze.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2008260EN.01001502.xml

| 11.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/15

---

Action brought on 5 August 2008 — Parfums Christian Dior v OHIM — Consolidated Artists (MANGO adorably)

(Case T-308/08)

(2008/C 260/28)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Parfums Christian Dior SA (Paris, France) (represented by: E. Cornu, D. Moreau and F. de Visscher, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Consolidated Artists B.V. (Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 May 2008 in case R 1162/2007-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 May 2008 in case R 1162/2007-2; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘MANGO adorably’ for goods in class 3

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: French trade mark registration No 33 209 849 of the word mark ‘ADIORABLE’ for goods in class 3; French trade mark registration No 94 536 564 of the word mark ‘J'ADORE’ for various goods, amongst which goods in class 3; international trade mark registration No 811 001 of the word mark ‘ADIORABLE’ for various goods, amongst which goods in class 3; international trade mark registration No 687 422 of the word mark ‘J'ADORE’ for various goods, amongst which goods in class 3

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal erred in its finding that there was no likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned and that the use of the trade mark applied for would not take unfair advantage of the reputation of earlier trade marks, on the wrong reasoning that under both legal grounds the trade marks concerned are not sufficiently similar.

Pleas in law:

---
LAND ROVER EMISSION DEFECT INFORMATION REPORT NO. L08138D0A Causal part name: Mass Air Flow Sensor Causal part number: PHF000140

Issued: 24 February 2010 Page 1 of 2 Code of Federal Regulations. Title 40. Part 85. Subpart T. §85.1903 - Emissions Defect Information Report (c)(1) The manufacturers corporate name. Land Rover. (c)(2) A description of the defect. Drivers of Range Rover, Range Rover Sport and LR3 vehicles are alerted to a defective mass air flow sensor by M.I.L. illumination together with rough and uneven engine running. The majority of mass air flow sensor replacements are due to mis-diagnosis by dealers. (c)(3) A description of each class or category of vehicles potentially affected by the defect including make, model, model year, and such other information as may be required to identify these vehicles. See table in section (c)(4)(i) below. (c)(4) For each class or category of vehicle or engine described in response to paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the following shall also be provided: (c)(4)(i) The number of vehicles or engines known or estimated to have the defect and an explanation of the means by which this number was determined.

MODEL YEAR TEST GROUP MODEL SALES DEFECTS 2006 6LRXT04.0001 LR3 5276 2 2006 6LRXT04.2001 Range Rover; Range Rover Sport; LR3 66469 37 The above data was taken from Land Rover's warranty tracking report dated 2009 Q3. (c)(4)(ii) The address of the plant at which the potentially defective vehicles or engines were produced. Land Rover Solihull Plant, Birmingham, England. (c)(5) An evaluation of the emissions impact of the defect and a description of any driveability problems which a defective vehicle might exhibit. A defective mass air flow sensor may cause elevated carbon monoxide emissions. A defective mass air flow sensor causes rough and uneven engine running. A defective mass air flow sensor causes M.I.L. illumination. 

## EPA 3993 Received 3/2/2010 via E-mailLAND ROVER EMISSION DEFECT INFORMATION REPORT NO. L08138D0A Causal part name: Mass Air Flow Sensor Causal part number: PHF000140

Issued: 24 February 2010 Page 2 of 2 (c)(6) Available emissions data which relate to the defect. There is no data available quantifying the impact on emissions of this defect.

(c)(7) An indication of any an ticipated manufacturer follow-up. Land Rover instructed dealers to contact the technical helpdesk before replacing a mass air flow sensor. This action significantly reduced the rate of mass air flow sensor replacements, indicating that false diagnosis led to unnecessary replacements. Genuine mass air flow sensor faults are regarded as self campaigning, MIL illumination plus uneven engine running will prompt drivers to return the vehicle to a Land Rover dealer for rectification. 

## EPA 3993 Received 3/2/2010 via E-mail
#### NICKLOS DRILLING COMPANY and Compass Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Floyd COWART and Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor, Respondents.

No. 89-4944.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 6, 1990.

H. Lee Lewis, Jr., Griggs & Harrison, Houston, Tex., for petitioners.

Lloyd N. Frischhertz, Seelig, Cossé, Frischhertz & Poulliard, New Orleans, for Cowart.

Joshua T. Gillelan, II, Samuel J. Oshinsky, Sol., U.S. Dept, of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Director.

*879Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion August 9, 1990, 5 Cir., 1990, 907 F.2d 1552)

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
# 2006 - Appalachian Regional Commission

- College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2005–2009 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties. The post College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2005–2009 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2005–2009 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2005–2009 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2005–2009 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties. The post High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2005–2009 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2005–2009 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average.The post Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2005–2009 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2006–2010 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties.The post High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2006–2010 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2006–2010 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2006–2010 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2006–2010 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties. The post College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2006–2010 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2006–2010 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2006–2010 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2006–2010 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2006–2010 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2006–2010 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties. The post Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2006–2010 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2009044EN.01006401.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/64

---

Action brought on 17 December 2008 — Monoscoop v OHIM (SUDOKU SAMURAI BINGO)

(Case T-564/08)

(2009/C 44/108)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Monoscoop BV (Alkmaar, Netherlands) (represented by A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 30 September 2008, in Case R 816/2008-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 30 September 2008, in Case R 816/2008-2; and

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘SUDOKU SAMURAI BINGO’ (Application for registration No 5.769.013) for goods and services in classes 9, 28 and 41.

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark.

Pleas in law:

---