alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          86,522
<SECURITIES>                                   105,050
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     40,285
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               289,980
<PP&E>                                          59,983
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,461
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 325,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,389
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            36
<OTHER-SE>                                     292,931
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   325,081
<SALES>                                        218,932
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               224,875
<CGS>                                          138,463
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  138,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               102,477
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (9,083)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,482)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (10,905)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,423
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,423
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5708]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. RAHALL:
       H.R. 6274.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       This bill is enacted pursuant to the power granted to 
     Congress under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the United 
     States Constitution.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4685 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4685

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  515 Hope Street in Bristol, Rhode Island, as the ``First Sergeant P. 
                    Andrew McKenna Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FIRST SERGEANT P. ANDREW MCKENNA JR. POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 515 Hope Street in Bristol, Rhode Island, shall be known and 
designated as the ``First Sergeant P. Andrew McKenna Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``First 
Sergeant P. Andrew McKenna Jr. Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit
32.2





SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas P. Reed, Vice President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Thomas P.
      ReedThomas P. Reed(Chief financial officer)November 12, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 1
          - [REG-112916-23]
          - RIN 1545-BQ90

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Cancellation of a notice of public hearing on a proposed rulemaking.

# SUMMARY:

This document cancels a public hearing on proposed regulations concerning the statutory disallowance rule enacted by the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 to disallow a Federal income tax deduction for a qualified conservation contribution made by a partnership or an S corporation after December 29, 2022, if the amount of the contribution exceeds 2.5 times the sum of each partner's or S corporation shareholder's relevant basis.

# DATES:

The public hearing scheduled for January 3, 2024, at 10 a.m. ET is cancelled.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vivian Hayes of the Publications and Regulations Section, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration) at (202) 317-6901 (not a toll-free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A notice of proposed rulemaking and a notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 20, 2023 (88 FR 80910) announced that a public hearing being held in person and by teleconference was scheduled for January 3, 2024, at 10 a.m. ET. The subject of the public hearing is under 26 CFR part 1.                

The public comment period for these regulations expired on December 20, 2023. The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit a request to testify and an outline of the topics to be addressed by December 20, 2023. We did not receive a request to testify at the Public Hearing. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for January 3, 2024, at 10 a.m. ET is cancelled.

Oluwafunmilayo A. Taylor,

Section Chief, Publications and Regulations Section, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure & Administration).

[FR Doc. 2023-28793 Filed 12-29-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-43952 and 333-33338) pertaining to the 1993 Stock
Option/Stock Issuance Plan of Ultratech Stepper, Inc. of our report dated
January 19, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Ultratech Stepper, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
March 21, 2001
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6055]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        ENROLLED BILLS PRESENTED

  The Secretary of the Senate reported that on August 3, 2012, she had 
presented to the President of the United States the following enrolled 
bills:

       S. 270. An act to direct the Secretary of the Interior to 
     convey certain Federal land to Deschutes County, Oregon.
       S. 271. An act to require the Secretary of Agriculture to 
     enter into a property conveyance with the city of Wallowa, 
     Oregon, and for other purposes.
       S. 739. An act to authorize the Architect of the Capitol to 
     establish battery recharging stations for privately owned 
     vehicles in parking areas under the jurisdiction of the 
     Senate at no net cost to the Federal Government.
       S. 3363. An act to provide for the use of National Infantry 
     Museum and Soldier Center Commemorative Coin surcharges, and 
     for other purposes.

  The Secretary of the Senate reported that on August 7, 2012, she had 
presented to the President of the United States the following enrolled 
bill:

       S. 3510. An act to prevent harm to the national security or 
     endangering the military officers and civilian employees to 
     whom Internet publication of certain information applies, and 
     for other purposes.

                          ____________________
```
EX-10.1



 






Exhibit 10.1




SECOND EXTENSION OF THE AMENDED AND RENEWED MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT




     THIS SECOND EXTENSION OF THE AMENDED AND RENEWED MANAGEMENT SERVICES EXTENSION AGREEMENT is
entered into as of the 29th day of August, 2004, by and between The Hearst Corporation
(“Hearst”), a Delaware corporation, and Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware
corporation.



W I T N E S S E T H




     WHEREAS, Hearst and the Company entered into an Amended and Renewed Management Services
Agreement dated as of August 29, 2000 (the “Amended and Renewed Management Services Agreement”);



     WHEREAS, Hearst and the Company entered into an Extension of the Amended and Renewed
Management Services Agreement dated as of August 29, 2002; and



     WHEREAS, Hearst and the Company mutually desire to further extend the term of the Amended and
Renewed Management Services Agreement as set forth hereinafter;



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the term of the Amended and Renewed Management Services Agreement is hereby extended
for each of the Managed Stations respectively until the earlier of: (i) Hearst’s divestiture of
such Managed Station to a third party; (ii) if applicable, the exercise of the option granted to
The Company for certain of the Managed Stations, pursuant to the Option Agreement of even date
entered into between the parties hereto; or (iii) December 31, 2005, provided that, Hearst shall
have the right to terminate this Agreement with respect to any Managed Station at any time upon 90
days prior written notice if the option period or right of first refusal period with respect to
such Managed Station, as applicable, each as set forth in the Option Agreement, has expired without
having been exercised.



     Except as expressly set forth herein, all terms and conditions of the Amended and Renewed
Management Services Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. Unless otherwise defined
herein, all capitalized terms shall have their respective meanings as set forth in the Amended and
Renewed Management Services Agreement.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	THE HEARST CORPORATION	 	 	 	HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Ronald J. Doerfler
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Jonathan C. Mintzer
	

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	Name: Ronald J. Doerfler
	 	 	 	 	 	Name: Jonathan C. Mintzer
	

	 	Title: Senior Vice President
	 	 	 	 	 	Title: Vice President, General Counsel and
	

	 	and Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	Secretary
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	Dated: March 29, 2005
	 	 	 	 	 	Dated: March 29, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6073
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus AMOS JUNIOR SCOTT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:00-CR-00069-5; 1:03-CV-00251) Submitted: June 12, 2006 Decided: June 23, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Amos Junior Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Amy E. Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Amos Junior Scott seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of his constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Scott has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
SERVED : JUL Y 9 , 201 0

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C IN TH EMATTE RO F DIAMON D AI RCHARTER , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10EA000 4 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S NO . FAA-2010-062 0

NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofore designateda s Cas e No . 2 0 lOEA l 10008 ) ha s bee n assigne d t o th e undersigned . Al l future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s o n th e attache d Servic e List .

[ormi e A . Yode ; Chie f Aaministrativ i Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFAA Docke t No . CP10EA000 4 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000' *

ON ECOP Y Gregor y S . Winton , Respondent' s Counse l Th e Aviatio n Law Firm On e Researc hCourt , Suit e 45 0 Rockville , M D 2085 0 TEL : 301-294-855 0 FAX : 301-294-252 5 Zachary M . Herman , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , EAL- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-325 8 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e Ronni e A . Yoder , Chie f Administrativ e Law Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mEl2-32 0 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-214 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

* Service was by U.S . Mail . For servic e i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Federa l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building - Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D

C 20591 , Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130170.eng.txt[3/8/2013 9:44:39 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0170

Focus Ready Draft 1/17/2013

ENGINEER: Arnold \ REC

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: Amfine Chemical Corporation

 
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130170.eng.txt[3/8/2013 9:44:39 AM]

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (01/11/2013):

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P2B1T1 .

Health: 1 Not Required

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1.00 ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: NR

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0170

Number of Sites/ Location: 3

unknown site(s)

Days/yr: 50
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130170.eng.txt[3/8/2013 9:44:39 AM]

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

Incineration

Output 2: 3.3E-1 kg/site-day over 50 days/yr from 3 sites

or 5.0E+1 kg/yr

Incineration

Output 2: 1.7E-1 kg/site-day over 50 days/yr from 3 sites

or 2.5E+1 kg/yr

Incineration

Output 2: 3.3E-1 kg/site-day over 2 days/yr from 3 sites

or 2.0E+0 kg/yr
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p130170.eng.txt[3/8/2013 9:44:39 AM]

RELEASE TOTAL

7.7E+1 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY
Exhibit 23




Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
The Beard Company:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (No. 33-87110, 33-98482, and 333-06757) on Form S-
8 of The Beard Company of our report dated April 7, 2000,
relating to the balance sheets of The Beard Company and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the
related statements of operations, shareholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 1999, which report appears in the
December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of The Beard
Company.


                                             KPMG LLP

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
April 10, 2000
# C o urt o f A ppe a ls

o f th e S ta te o f G e o rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 5 D0 05 9 . DANI ELLE TERRELL v . FYR SFR BORROW ER, LLC.

I n this d isp ossesso ry p ro c eed ing, the state c o u rt granted FYR SFR B o rro w er,

LLC a w rit o f p o ssessio n agai n s t D a nielle Terrell o n A u gu st 22, 2024, af ter Terrell

f ailed to p ay the rent d u e in the amo u nt o f $7 ,7 81

. 40. On Sep tember 1 2, 2024, Terrell

f iled an a p p lic atio n f

o r d isc retio nary rev iew t o c hallenge the trial c ou rt’ s ru ling. W e,

ho w ev er, lac k j u risd ic tio n.

N o d isc retio nary ap p lic atio n is requ ired in this c ase. A f inal j u dgment is d irec tly

ap p ealable u nd er OCGA § 5- 6- 34 (a) (1 ), and this ac tio n d o es no t ap p ear to f all w ithin

o ne o f the c atego ries of c ases fo r w hic h a d isc retio nary ap p lic atio n is requ ired to seek

ap p ellate rev iew u nd er OCGA § 5- 6

- 35 (a). Ord inarily, und er OCGA § 5- 6

- 35 (j ), this

Co u rt w ill grant a timely a p p lic atio n fo r d isc retio nary rev iew if the lo w e r c o u rt’ s o rd er

is s u bj e c t to d irec t ap peal. See C i ty o f Ri n c o n v

. C o u ch

, 27 2 Ga. A p p. 41 1

, 41 2 (6 1 2

SE2d 59 6 ) (2005). H o w ev e r, a s thi s c ase is a d isp o s sesso ry p ro c eed ing, OCGA § 44- 7

-

56 go verns the ap p eal p ro c ed u re. OCGA § 44- 7 -56 (b) (1 ) p ro v id e s that “ [a] c o p y o f

t h e petitio n f

o r rev iew f

iled in the rev iew ing su p erio r o r state c o u rt o r the no t i c e o f

ap p eal shall be f

iled w ith the c lerk o f the t r ial c ou rt within sev en days af ter the d ate the

j u d gment w as entered in the trial c o u r t

. ” See also Ra y M. W ri ght, In c. v

. Jo n es , 239

Ga. A p p

. 521 , 522- 5 23 (521 SE2d 456 ) (1 9 9 9 ).

H ere, Terrell filed her a p p lic atio n 21 d ays a f ter the trial c ou rt’ s o rd er. B ec au se

OCGA § 44- 7- 56 (b) (1 ) requ ired Terrell to f ile a no tic e o f ap peal w ithin sev en d ays, October 04, 2024this f

iling is u ntimely, and this a p p eal is hereby D I SM I SSED f o r lac k o f j urisd ic tio n.

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O ffic e

, A t la n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I c e r t ify t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e

x t r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

.

W it n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t

h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

. 10/04/2024
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-41457

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ISMAEL TORRES-FIGUEROA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:12-CR-1386-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Ismael Torres-Figueroa raises

an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711

F.3d 541, 562 n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (June 6, 2013)

(No. 12-10695), in which this court concluded that the generic, contemporary

definition of “sexual abuse of a minor” does not include the age-differential

requirement that Torres-Figueroa asserts is required. The appellant’s motion

for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-41457 Document: 00512347102 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
Exhibit 10.21
 ULTRATECH, INC.  GRANT AGREEMENT
 WITNESSETH
 RECITALS
   NOW, THEREFORE
 Grant of Option .
 Option Term .
 Limited Transferability .




---



##### 



Dates of Exercise .
 Cessation of Service .
   earlier
   2




---



##### 



Service
 Employee
 permanently disabled permanent disability
 subsidiary
  3




---



##### 



parent
 Corporate Transaction .
       4




---



##### 



provided
  Adjustment in Option Shares .
 Privilege of Stock Ownership .
 Manner of Exercising Option .
   5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



Governing Law .
 Compliance with Laws and Regulations .
 Successors and Assigns .
 Liability of Corporation .
   Employment/Service At Will .
  7




---



##### 



Notices .
 Construction .
 Additional Terms Applicable to an Incentive Stock Option .
    8




---



##### 



Additional Terms Applicable to a Non-Statutory Stock Option .
 Leave of Absence
   9




---



##### 



10




---



##### 



EXHIBIT I
 NOTICE OF EXERCISE OF STOCK OPTION
   
 OptioneeAddress:Print name in exact manner it is to appear on the stock certificate:Address to which certificate is to be sent, if different from address above: