alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.11



FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSE AGREEMENT



THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSE AGREEMENT (Fifth Amendment) is entered into August 5, 2005
(Effective Date) by and between Blast Energy Services, Inc. (formerly known as Verdisys, Inc.), a California corporation (Blast) and Maxim TEP, Inc., a Texas Corporation (Maxim).



WHEREAS on March 8, 2005, Blast and Maxim entered into an assignment of license
agreement requiring payments to be made in accordance with a defined payment schedule;



WHEREAS Maxim has failed to pay Three Hundred and Sixty Five Thousand ($365,000) Dollars of the total balance due on June 3, 2005, has failed to cure the default within the defined 45 day cure period and has failed to pay the amount by
the extension date of August 5, 2005;



WHEREAS Maxim has requested an
extended period to pay Three Hundred and Sixty Five Thousand ($365,000) Dollars of the additional consideration due;



THEREFORE, in view of the good and valuable consideration stated below, Blast and Maxim agree as follows:



|1. | Extension Period.
|-- | -----------------



1.1 Blast agrees to extend the period that Maxim has to fund the Three Hundred and Sixty Five Thousand ($365,000) Dollars of the balance due to
August 12, 2005. Failure to pay the Three Hundred and Sixty Five Thousand ($365,000) Dollars on or before August 12, 2005 will result in the lapse of the assignment and forfeiture of all prior consideration.



|2. | Consideration.
|-- | --------------



2.1 In consideration of this Extension, Maxim shall pay a delinquency fee of Twenty Five Thousand ($25,000) Dollars on August 5, 2005.



All other terms of the Assignment of License Agreement and the First, Second,
Third and Fourth Amendment are unchanged and remain in full force and effect.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.



|                                      |  |  |  |               
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------
|MAXIM TEP, INC.                       |  |  |  |               
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Robert Sepos, CFO                 |  |  |  | Aug 5, 2005   
|Robert Sepos, Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  | Date          
|                                      |  | 
|BLAST ENERGY SERVICES, INC.           |  |  |  |               
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ David M. Adams                    |  |  |  | August 5, 2005
|David Adams, President & Co-CEO       |  |  |  | Date
### Docket Number: **FAA -** **2011 -**  **0916**
**Contacts.** Wi th whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? Organization Person Contacted Date Response BA Padraci

McCausland 6/1/2011 email
RAA Connie Arnold 6/1/2011 email TCCA Anthony Wan 6/1/2011 email
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Verdisys, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Wilson, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

\s\             Andrew WilsonAndrew WilsonPrincipal Accounting Officer August 18, 2003

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1
to the Annual Report of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 26, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Frances G. Rathke, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 11, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/ FRANCES G. RATHKE  
|Frances G. Rathke*     
|Chief Financial Officer



|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and will be retained by Green
Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
EX-10.11
                        PROMISSORY NOTE

                        PROMISSORY NOTE

Principal amount $4,000.00                             Date: June 17, 2004

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, RMD Technologies, Inc. hereby promise to
pay to the order of Patrick A. Galliher the sum of Four Thousand
Dollars, together with interest thereon at the rate of 1% per month on
the unpaid balance. Said sum shall be paid upon demand.

     This note shall at the option of any holder thereof be
immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of any of the
following:  1) Breach of any condition of any security interest,
mortgage, loan agreement, pledge agreement or guarantee granted as
collateral security for this note. 2) Breach of any condition of any
loan agreement, security agreement or mortgage, if any, having a
priority over any loan agreement, security agreement or mortgage on
collateral granted, in whole or in part, as collateral security for
this note. 3) Upon the death, incapacity, dissolution or liquidation
of any of the undersigned, or any endorser, guarantor to surety
hereto. 4) Upon the filing by any of the undersigned of an assignment
for the benefit of creditors, bankruptcy or other form of insolvency,
or by suffering an involuntary petition in bankruptcy or receivership
not vacated within thirty (30) days.

     In the event this note shall be in default and placed for
collection, then the undersigned agree to pay all reasonable attorney
fees and costs of collection. All payments hereunder shall be made to
such address as may from time to time be designated by any holder.

     The undersigned and all other parties to this note, whether as
endorsers, guarantors or sureties, agree to remain fully bound until
this note shall be fully paid and waive demand, presentment and
protest and all notices hereto and further agree to remain bound,
notwithstanding any extension, modification, waiver, or other
indulgence or discharge or release of any obligor hereunder or
exchange, substitution, or release of any collateral granted as
security for this note. No modification or indulgence by any holder
hereof shall be binding unless in writing; and any indulgence on any
one occasion shall not be an indulgence for any other or future
occasion. Any modification or change in terms, hereunder granted by
any holder hereof, shall be valid and binding upon each of the
undersigned, notwithstanding the acknowledgement of any of the
undersigned, and each of the undersigned does hereby irrevocably grant
to each of the others a power of attorney to enter into any such
modification on their behalf. The rights of any holder hereof shall be
cumulative and not necessarily successive. This note shall take effect
as a sealed instrument and shall be construed, governed and enforced
in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

                                       RMD Technologies, Inc.


                                       By: /s/  Pat Galliher
                                       Pat Galliher, President
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6162]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          DO-NOTHING CONGRESS

  (Ms. CHU asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Ms. CHU. Mr. Speaker, at the end of what Republicans consider to be a 
grueling work week consisting of 2\1/2\ whole days, Republicans are 
heading home once again to take the next 2 months off.
  The Republican-led ``Do-Nothing Congress'' was in session for a grand 
total of 8 days this month, and it took 5 weeks off before that.
  During their time here in Washington, Republicans made sure to vote 
to end Medicare as we know it, increase costs for seniors, and give tax 
breaks to millionaires and companies that ship jobs overseas.
  But on addressing the ongoing jobs crisis in this country, they did 
nothing. On providing tax cuts for the middle class and small business, 
they did nothing. On working towards a bipartisan solution to the 
looming fiscal cliff, they left the American people hanging by 
continuing to do nothing.
  The hardworking men and women who call this country home deserve so 
much better. They certainly deserve better than nothing.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2008313EN.01005302.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/53

---

Action brought on 13 October 2008 — Zeta Europe v OHIM (Superleggera)

(Case T-464/08)

(2008/C 313/95)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Zeta Europe BV (Het Ambacht, Netherlands) (represented by V. Bilardo, C. Bacchini and M. Mazzitelli, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 July 2008 in Case R 666/2008-1 concerning the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 July 2008 in Case R 666/2008-1 concerning the applicant;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘Superleggera’ (Community trade mark application No 5.456.207) for goods in Classes 12, 18 and 25.

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of the application for registration, having noted that the mark in question consists of the adjective ‘superleggera’ and that that will therefore be understood as a descriptive indication of the weight of goods.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b), 73 and 74 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark.

Pleas in law:

---
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 8 July 2009 – Commission v Atlantic Energy**

**(Case T-182/08)**

Arbitration clause – Contract for financial assistance concluded under a specific programme in the field of non‐nuclear energy – Failure to comply with the contract – Reimbursement of sums advanced – Statutory set-off – Procedure for judgment by default

1.                     *Procedure – Referral to the Court of First Instance under an arbitration clause (Art. 238 EC) (see paras 50-69)*

2.                     *Procedure – Referral to the Court of First Instance under an arbitration clause – Review of the legality of an extra-judicial
set-off decision between debts and credit balances adopted by the Commission on the basis of Regulation No 1605/2002 – Not
included (Arts 230 EC and 238 EC) (see para. 70)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought by the Commission under Article 238 EC for reimbursement of an advance paid by the European Community, together with interest, under contract BU 183/95 UK/AT. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

1.      Orders Atlantic Energy Ltd to reimburse to the Commission of the European Communities the principal sum of EUR 226 010, together
with the interest provided for under Article 23.1 of the general conditions of contract BU 183/95 UK/AT in respect of the
periods between 1 June 1996 and 28 February 2002 and between 16 July 2002 and 31 May 2008, less the sum of EUR 3 610.53, the
final sum being increased by the interest provided for under the abovementioned Article 23.1 of the general conditions as
from 1 June 2008 until the debt is discharged in full;

2.      Orders Atlantic Energy to pay the costs.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H5618-H5619]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 ADAM WALSH REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2012

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The unfinished business is the question on 
suspending the rules and passing the

[[Page H5619]]

bill (H.R. 3796) to reauthorize certain programs established by the 
Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, as amended.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the 
gentleman from Texas (Mr. Smith) that the House suspend the rules and 
pass the bill, as amended.
  The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the 
rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4646 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 462
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4646

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2018

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             June 14, 2018

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1900 Corporate Drive in Birmingham, Alabama, as the ``Lance Corporal 
             Thomas E. Rivers, Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL THOMAS E. RIVERS, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1900 Corporate Drive in Birmingham, Alabama, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lance Corporal Thomas E. Rivers, Jr. Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Thomas E. Rivers, Jr. Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 462

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4646

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1900 Corporate Drive in Birmingham, Alabama, as the ``Lance Corporal 
             Thomas E. Rivers, Jr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 14, 2018

                       Reported without amendment
```
## R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n

­ F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 1 9 0 9

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : T u e s d a y

, J u l y 2 8

, 2 0 1 5 1 0 : 3 9 A M

T o : j j o h n s o n @ j a m e s a j o h n s o n p c

. c o m

D e a r M r

. J o h n s o n :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f o r m y o u t h a t t h e f

o l l o w i n g i n f

o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f r o m y

o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k

e t N o

. F A A

− 2 0 1 5

− 1 9 0 9 )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f

o r t h e F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F A A ) t o p r o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.

P r o v i d e a c o p y o f t h e M o t i o n P i c t u r e a n d T e l e v i s i o n O p e r a t i o n s M a n u a l ( M P T O M ) w h i c h i s r e q u i r e d b y O r d e r

8 9 0 0

. 1

, V o l u m e 3

, C h a p t e r 8

, S e c t i o n 1

. I f y o u w i s h f o r u s t o p r o c e e d w i t h o u t t h i s m a n u a l a n d r e m o v e

c l o s e d

‐ s e t f i l m i n g f r o m y

o u r p r o p o s e d o p e r a t i o n p l e a s e i n f o r m o f u s o f y

o u r i n t e n t i o n b y t h e r e q u e s t e d

r e s p o n s e d a t e l i s t e d b e l o w

.

P l e a s e s u b m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

‐ p r o p r i e t a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t a t w w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v a n d s u b m i t a n y

p r o p r i e t a r y i n f

o r m a t i o n t o t h e F A A H e a d q u a r t e r s o r e l e c t r o n i c a l l y v i a e m a i l t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f a a

. g o v

. I f y

o u w a n t

u s t o p r o c e s s y

o u r r e q u e s t a n y f u r t h e r

, w e m u s t r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v

e b y 8 / 1 1 / 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t

r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n

, w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f

y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

I f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s

, p l e a s e f

e e l f r e e t o c o n t a c t m e a t ( 2 0 2 ) 2 6 7

­ 9 6 7 7

.

S i n c e r e l y

,

D a n N g o

F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22

- 0395

_________________ INGE and MARK CAHILL, RANDY and KERIN GAYNER , WI LLIAM and NANETTE REED, and IRVING ERICKSON

P et it io ners and Appellants,

v.
CITY OF COLUMBIA FALLS, COLUMBIA FALLS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT,

Respondents and Appellees,

and CNS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Montana Limited Liabilit y Co mpany,

Respondent. O R D E R

_________________ This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance wit h Rules 11 and 12 of the Montana Rules of A ppellate Procedure. A ft er reviewing th e Ap pellant’s opening br ief filed electroni cally o n September 30, 2022 , this Court has determined that th e br ie f does not co mp ly w it h th e below

referenced Rule and must be resubmitted. M. R. App. P. (12)(1)(i) requi res th at an appellant’s opening br ief shall contain an appendix th at includes th e rel evant judgments, order, f indings of

f act, concl usi ons of law, jur y instructi ons, rulings or decisions from which the appeal is taken. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED t hat wit hin ten (10) days of t he date of

t his Order th e Appellant shall electroni cally file wi

th th e Cl erk of

this Cour

t the relevant j udgment or order (s) from th e Distri ct Court and that one copy

of the rel evant j udgment or order s be served on each counsel o f record; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at pursuant to the Tem porary E le ctroni c Filing Rule 12(a)(4) the seven paper copi es of the Appellant’s Opening brief must comply wit h Rule 12(1)(i), M. R. App. P., including copies of the orders and judgment fr om which the appeal is taken; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at th e times fo r any subsequent briefing contained in M. 10/03/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0395R. Ap p. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the rel evant j udgment or order s . The Clerk of

this Court is di

rected to provide a true copy of thi s Order to co unsel fo r th e Appellant and to all counsel of record.

Electronically signed by: Beth Baker Justice, Montana Supreme Court October 3 2022
HO& J. N* uau1awlx, f%g,e2Eon.,2. **15. fiaulaw~n,** **Ptiga 3** Bon. 2. %. i:~%ulmln, Psg49 5

### aon, x. If. ntiuL&in,PSKQ 6

**The voter**  **boo nothing**  t6"Uowith the m&l **Or th0**  **bfI;.iOt, but**  **ii; r8f&1?6d**  **t0 US6**  **it, %Fp**  **order** to exeralsohis right to tot%. He OQIZ only r&e for those ?&me IMMB me printed
**on** It or strike them out and fnnort others. me Iscrllot cofx-:Yto hir: rr0fi tt.e ofriosrti or the &IV, rtgulw oz its Zace end aothentioated; both **by** the printiw,on tt and by l-J& sigruturs of t&u fulige

of election,88 the bnllothe ia zequuired

to use. 1r it la ic ttio **pow6r** at tho Li:fiisietura

to thus impose 0;)

voters in 

### szcrcisini~~

their aom5tltutiou6l rlgtit, the nsoesaityof votlq t:aketnprspare6fr:r then in advmmas, **ati** gut **to def6at**  their **6holo6, not**  **for** eat or **daoion or**  **iihelr own,**  but because of an anteoe~dent

der0UotloIlor thr curioars ~ppt@,ntei!

by law to prepme the ballota, oerta%Qlyno parposa to a0 00 con be illlpu~
**to.tk6** Legialeture nithaut tbs aleare& Sxgntdrd

on. '

' *In 8h~ oeue of Gallagbeir v. Ghuroh, thie court held t&it a ramcra to xnrk the word *voted*

in,thela

would dispose'oievery **act** 6f 8&isoandut& allege& egalxtet

the 0Wbe~rs 

### otoleotio5 in th@ reje0tfd 0sotloQ,X?o. 6, exa*pt those in rq&rtl to P tailor% ei aha presiding to.plaoe their **siemtore8** upon the ba f udg%s lota 1x1 cortala preainotaend numbu than.*.
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Development & Investment,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Eric R. Boyer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of this
13th day of May, 2005.



/s/ Eric R. Boyer
-------------------------------
Eric R. Boyer
President and CEO
Premier Development & Investment, Inc.