alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.**§ **1350)**     The undersigned, as the chief financial officer of ARRIS Group, Inc., certifies that to thebest of his knowledge the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, whichaccompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the quarterly report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ARRISGroup, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is madepursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied uponfor any other purpose.     Dated this 9th day of May, 2008.         /s/ David B. Potts  David B. Potts   Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
# Snapshot Data Fields

United States Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics Quarterly Census of Employement and Wages (Annual Averages)

# ARC Counties

# autoCrat_MergeData_DO_NOT_DELET

# NVScriptsProperties

# ARC States
Exhibit 99.1

December 18, 1998


The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd.,
New York Branch, formerly known as
Mitsubishi Bank Trust Company of New York
1251 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10020
Attention: Mr. Tadahiro Yamada


Chase Manhattan Bank Delaware,
formerly known as Chemical Bank Delaware
Corporate Trustee Administration Department
1201 Market Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
Attention: Mr. John J. Cashin

               Re: Annual Statement as to Compliance

Gentlemen:

      Pursuant to Section 3.10 of that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement") by and among MMCA Auto Owner Trust 1995-1, as Issuer,
MMCA Auto Receivables, Inc., as Seller, and Mitsubishi Motors Credit of
America, Inc., as Servicer, I hereby certify the following, as of May 31,
1996: (1) a review of the activities of the Servicer during the period
December 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995 and of its performance of its
obligations under the Agreement has been made under my supervision and (2)
to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.


Sincerely,

MITSUBISHI MOTORS CREDIT OF AMERICA, INC.


/s/ Hideyuki Kitamura 
--------------------------------------
Hideyuki Kitamura
Executive Vice President and Treasurer
Exhibit 15.1














May 3, 2012





The Board of Directors and Shareholders


MCG Capital Corporation





We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-137565 and Form S-8 No. 333-167494) pertaining to the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation and the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Non- Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation of our report dated May 3, 2012 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements and schedules of MCG Capital Corporation included in its Form 10-Q for the three- month period ended March 31, 2012 .








/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4644 

To withdraw certain National Forest System land in the Emigrant Crevice 

area located in the Custer Gallatin National Forest, Park County, Montana, from the mining and mineral leasing laws of the United States, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2017 

Mr. GIANFORTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To withdraw certain National Forest System land in the 

Emigrant Crevice area located in the Custer Gallatin 

National Forest, Park County, Montana, from the mining and mineral leasing laws of the United States, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Yellowstone Gateway 

5 Protection Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4644 IH

1 SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL. 

2 (a) DEFINITION OF MAP.—In this section, the term 

3 ‘‘map’’ means the map entitled ‘‘Emigrant Crevice Pro4 posed Withdrawal Area’’ and dated November 10, 2016. 

5 (b) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights 

6 in existence on the date of enactment of this Act, the Na7 tional Forest System land and interests in the National 

8 Forest System land, as depicted on the map, is withdrawn 

9 from— 

10 (1) location, entry, and patent under the mining 

11 laws; and 

12 (2) disposition under all laws pertaining to min13 eral and geothermal leasing. 

14 (c) ACQUIRED LAND.—Any land or interest in land 

15 within the area depicted on the map that is acquired by 

16 the United States after the date of enactment of this Act 

17 shall, on acquisition, be immediately withdrawn in accord18 ance with this section. 

19 (d) MAP.— 

20 (1) SUBMISSION OF MAP.—As soon as prac21 ticable after the date of enactment of this Act, the 

22 Secretary of Agriculture shall file the map with— 

23 (A) the Committee on Energy and Natural 

24 Resources of the Senate; and 

25 (B) the Committee on Natural Resources 

26 of the House of Representatives. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4644 IH

1 (2) FORCE OF LAW.—The map filed under 

2 paragraph (1) shall have the same force and effect 

3 as if included in this Act, except that the Secretary 

4 of Agriculture may correct clerical and typographical 

5 errors in the map. 

6 (3) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY.—The map filed 

7 under paragraph (1) shall be on file and available 

8 for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the 

9 Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Manage10 ment. 

11 (e) EFFECT.—Nothing in this section affects any rec12 reational use, including hunting or fishing, that is author13 ized on land within the area depicted on the map under 

14 applicable law as of the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register: June 28, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 124)]
[Notices]               
[Page 37779-37780]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28jn11-50]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Arkansas Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a State Advisory 
Committee (SAC) meeting of the Arkansas Advisory Committee to the 
Commission will convene on Thursday, July 28, 2011 at 2 p.m. and 
adjourn at approximately 5 p.m. (CST) at University of Little Rock 
William H. Bowen School of Law, Faculty Library, Room 422, 1201 McMath 
Avenue, Little Rock, AR 72202. The purpose of the meeting is to 
continue planning a future civil rights project.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by August 11, 2011. 
The address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 400 State Avenue, Suite 
908, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Persons wishing to e-mail their 
comments, or to present their comments verbally at the meeting, or who 
desire additional information should contact Farella E. Robinson, 
Regional Director, Central Regional Office, at (913) 551-1400, (or for 
hearing impaired TDD 913-551-1414), or by e-mail to 
frobinson@usccr.gov. Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the 
meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should 
contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the 
scheduled date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Central Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Central Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

[[Page 37780]]

    Dated in Washington, DC on June 23, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-16102 Filed 6-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**The Board of DirectorsIPC Holdings, Ltd.     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatement No. 333-107052 on Form S-8 of IPC Holdings,Ltd. of our reports dated February 21, 2005, with respectto the consolidated balance sheets of IPC Holdings, Ltd. as ofDecember 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidatedstatements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three yearperiod ended December 31, 2004, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2004, which reports appear in theDecember 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of IPCHoldings, Ltd.     /s/ KPMG       *Chartered Accountants*Hamilton, BermudaMarch 3, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         2,093,006
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,533,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                      15,030
<INVENTORY>                                      178,215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7,503,942
<PP&E>                                         2,397,176
<DEPRECIATION>                                   438,998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                13,142,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         10,197,309
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                          208
<COMMON>                                          18,243
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,458,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  13,142,668
<SALES>                                       12,267,148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              12,267,148
<CGS>                                         10,057,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 14,476,013
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (25,283)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                27,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (2,210,982)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       7,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2,218,482)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,218,482)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.16)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, ArthurZafiropoulo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

·       theAnnual Report of Ultratech, Inc. on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·       theinformation contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of Ultratech, Inc.
| By:                              | /s/ Arthur  Zafiropoulo |   |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Name: Arthur Zafiropoulo         |
| Title: *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

I, Bruce Wright,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

·       theAnnual Report of Ultratech, Inc. on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·       theinformation contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of Ultratech, Inc.
| By:                              | /s/ Bruce  Wright |   |
|----------------------------------|-------------------|--------|
| Name: Bruce Wright               |
| Title: *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
#### In the Matter of H. Peter YOUNG, Esq., Respondent. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank Stearns GIESE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 74-3407.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 2, 1976.

*324See also, 9 Cir., 537 F.2d 324 and 537 F.2d 326.

*

 Honorable William J. Lindberg, Senior United States District Judge, Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.

ORDER

Before HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and LINDBERG,* District Judge.

On November 24, 1975, H. Peter Young, counsel for appellant, was ordered to show cause why he should not be subjected to disciplinary action for failure to prosecute this appeal with due diligence. On January 8,1976, pursuant to the November 24, 1975, order, a hearing was had before a panel of this court. At the hearing it appeared that, although notice of appeal had been filed on November 27, 1974, and although appellant’s brief originally had been due on March 17, 1975, and although that due date had been extended, appellant’s brief had not as of the date of hearing been filed. And it presently appears that Mr. Young, together with his co-counsel Michael H. Withey, has placed the rights of his client in jeopardy through failure to comply with the rules of this court, with the orders of this court, and with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, because the United States has moved to dismiss this appeal. Now therefore,

It is ordered that H. Peter Young complete appellant’s opening brief and file it with the clerk of this court on or before 3:00 p. m. on Thursday, February 19, 1976, and that no extension of this deadline will be permitted. And

It is further ordered that, if H. Peter Young fails to complete appellant’s opening brief and file it as directed above, this court will consider the issuance of a further citation directing him to appear at a time and place to be fixed, to show cause why some penalty should not be assessed against him, including suspension or disbarment, under Fed.R.App.P. 46(b) and (c). The United States’ motion to dismiss will be further considered at that time.

Service of this order will be made on the appellant Giese and on the respondent by the United States Marshal.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
                   CALCULATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
 
    Shares used in the net income per common share computation are the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding plus dilutive common share
equivalents.
 
    Shares used in the per share computations are as follows:
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             YEAR ENDED         YEAR ENDED         YEAR ENDED
                                                          DECEMBER 31, 1996  DECEMBER 31, 1995  DECEMBER 31, 1994
                                                          -----------------  -----------------  -----------------
<S>                                                       <C>                <C>                <C>
Weighted average common shares outstanding..............       20,131,000         18,429,000         15,026,000
Common equivalent shares from stock options granted
 (using the treasury stock method)......................        1,193,000          1,729,000          1,906,000
                                                          -----------------  -----------------  -----------------
Shares used in computing net income per share...........       21,324,000         20,158,000         16,932,000
                                                          -----------------  -----------------  -----------------
                                                          -----------------  -----------------  -----------------
Net income..............................................    $  35,311,000      $  24,234,000      $  11,019,000
                                                          -----------------  -----------------  -----------------
                                                          -----------------  -----------------  -----------------
Net income per share....................................    $        1.66      $        1.20      $        0.65
                                                          -----------------  -----------------  -----------------
                                                          -----------------  -----------------  -----------------
</TABLE>
 
------------------------
 
*   All share and per share data have been restated to reflect a two-for-one
    stock split distributed on May 10, 1995.
 
                                       31
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALONSO GRADO, a/k/a Lonsie, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 20-2009

(D.C. No. 2:18-CR-01254-RB-1)

(D. N.M.)

_________________________________

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________

Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, BACHARACH and CARSON, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

Alonso Grado pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 

50 grams or more of methamphetamine, distribution of methamphetamine, and use of 

a communication facility to further the commission of a drug trafficking crime. He 

was sentenced to serve 180 months in prison. Although his plea agreement contained 

a waiver of his appellate rights, he filed a notice of appeal. The government has 

moved to enforce the appeal waiver in the plea agreement pursuant to United States 

v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). 

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines 

of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for 

its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 3, 2020

Christopher M. Wolpert

Clerk of Court
2

Under Hahn, we consider “(1) whether the disputed appeal falls within the 

scope of the waiver of appellate rights; (2) whether the defendant knowingly and 

voluntarily waived his appellate rights; and (3) whether enforcing the waiver would 

result in a miscarriage of justice.” Id. at 1325. The government asserts that all of the 

Hahn conditions have been satisfied because: (1) Mr. Grado’s appeal is within the 

scope of the appeal waiver; (2) he knowingly and voluntarily waived his appellate 

rights; and (3) enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice. 

In response to the government’s motion, Mr. Grado concedes his appeal 

waiver is enforceable under the standard set forth in Hahn. Based on this concession 

and our independent review of the record, we grant the government’s motion to 

enforce the appeal waiver and dismiss the appeal. This dismissal does not affect 

Mr. Grado’s right to pursue post-conviction relief on the grounds permitted in his 

plea agreement.

Entered for the Court

Per Curiam
# 2013 - Appalachian Regional Commission

- College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties. The post College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties.The post High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties.The post Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average.The post Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties. The post High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties.The post College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average.The post Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.