alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Average SO2 Emissions and Coal Sulfur for White Bluff

Dayana Medina to: pettyjohn 09/06/2012 10:08 AM

Cc: "Brown, Derrick", mac, "Davis, Anthony", Spencer, Stuart, Stuart, 

rheaume, Jeremy Jewell (jjewell@trinityconsultants.com), gjohns6

From: Dayana Medina/R6/USEPA/US

To: pettyjohn@adeq.state.ar.us

Cc: "Brown, Derrick" <brownd@adeq.state.ar.us>, mac@adeq.state.ar.us, "Davis, Anthony" 

<DavisA@adeq.state.ar.us>, Spencer, Stuart <SPENCER@adeq.state.ar.us>, Stuart 

<SPENCER@adeq.state.ar.us>, rheaume@adeq.state.ar.us, Jeremy Jewell 

Hi Mary, 

The monthly average SO2 emissions in lb/MMBtu are compared with monthly average sulfur data in 

weight percent for Units 1 and 2 in the attached graphs. We obtained sulfur content data (fuel receipts 

data) reported by Entergy to the Energy Information Agency (EIA) for the period January 2001-June 2012 

on forms EIA-923 Sch 2 and FERC-423. We calculated average monthly sulfur content by multiplying 

each sample's percent sulfur content by its corresponding tonnage, adding up all of the sulfur tons and 

dividing by the total tons of coal from all loads for each month to obtain a monthly average sulfur content. 

We then compared the EIA data to SO2 emission data reported by the source to CAMD. 

There does appear to be a decrease in the average monthly sulfur content beginning in Jan 2007, which 

is the year Entergy said their long term contract with a coal supplier ended, allowing them to get coal from 

other suppliers. In the email thread you forwarded it was also mentioned that in 2006, Entergy added a 

neural net system and did extensive boiler tuning, but the data shows that the average monthly SO2 

emissions actually went up in 2006 compared to 2005 levels at both units. There is a decrease in the 

average monthly SO2 emissions beginning in Jan 2007, which appears to correspond to the decrease in 

the average monthly sulfur content of the coal rather than to any modifications made to the units. 

Our other concern is that there's a clear upward trend in the average monthly SO2 emissions beginning 

around May 2010 at Unit 1. Although there was a slight increase in the average monthly sulfur content 

between May and Sept 2010, the average monthly sulfur content has remained pretty constant since 

around mid 2010. However, the average monthly SO2 emissions have continued an upward trend at 

Unit 1 even as recent as June 2012. It is not clear why there is this upward trend at Unit 1 when the 

average monthly sulfur content has remained constant. We are also concerned with the possibility of this 

upward trend continuing, which could potentially result in the new baseline no longer being appropriate in 

the future. We can discuss further during our call today. 

 

Best Regards, 

Dayana Medina

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6

Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division 

Air Planning Section (6PD-L)

1445 Ross Avenue

Dallas, TX 75202

214-665-7241

medina.dayana@epa.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Francisco Santana, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Fisher, J.), both rendered December 14, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 7310/85, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 1351/86, upon his pleas of guilty; and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

At the time of his pleas of guilty, the defendant, a predicate felon, was warned by the court that if he did not appear for *297sentencing, the negotiated sentences of 4 Vi to 9 years might be increased to as much as 12 Vi to 25 years. The defendant absconded but was returned on a warrant three years later and was sentenced to two concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years. He now seeks to have his sentences vacated on the ground that they were imposed without the benefit of an updated presentence report *(see, People v Sanchez,*143 AD2d 377; *People v Jackson,*106 AD2d 93; *People v Halaby,*77 AD2d 717).

The record shows that the probation department reinterviewed the defendant prior to sentencing and prepared and submitted to the court an addendum to the original presentence report. The information regarding his employment history and family situation that the defendant now claims was omitted from the addendum was brought to the court’s attention by defense counsel. In any event, the record makes clear that the one-half year increase in the sentence originally promised resulted from the defendant’s failure to appear for sentencing and not from any deficiency in the information possessed by the court. Accordingly, resentencing is not required. Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.13





AMENDMENT TO PLACEMENT AGENCY AGREEMENT





THIS AMENDMENT is made as of this 19th day of November, 2010 (this “Amendment”) by and between Trident Partners, Ltd. (“Trident”), and Blast Energy Services, Inc. (the “Company”).





WITNESSETH:





WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into that certain placement agency agreement, dated November 15, 2010 (the “Original Agreement”); and





WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Original Agreement as set forth below;





NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which all of the parties hereto hereby acknowledge, the parties hereto agree as follows (capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings as in the Original Agreement):





1.  The following paragraph shall be added as subsection (c) to Article 5 of the Original Agreement:





“(c)
The Company will be responsible for providing Trident with all due diligence materials requested by Trident and the Company covenants that none of the due diligence materials, any documents provided with respect to the Offering, or any other document furnished or to be furnished to Trident by the Company or the Company’s representatives pursuant hereto or in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby, contain or will contain any untrue statement of fact or omits or will omit to state any material fact necessary to make the statements herein or therein not false or misleading.”





2.  All other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement are unmodified and remain in full force and effect.





3.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which when taken together shall constitute an original.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.





Trident Partners, Ltd.

Blast Energy Services, Inc.By:
/s/ Edward Flynn

By:
/s/ Michael L. PetersonEdward Flynn/Brian Schantz

Michael L. Peterson
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5933]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           COACH JIM CALHOUN

  (Mr. COURTNEY asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. COURTNEY. Mr. Speaker, in a few short hours, a giant in the State 
of Connecticut, Coach Jim Calhoun, is going to announce his retirement 
after 26 years of leading the men's basketball program.
  When he arrived 26 years ago, it was an also-ran program. Today, he 
has secured three national championships, he was inducted into the Hall 
of Fame, and the NBA is populated with graduates like Ray Allen, Emeka 
Okafor, and Kemba Walker, who are all-stars and really make the State 
of Connecticut so proud.
  He also has performed hundreds of acts of personal kindness, small 
and large, Coaches vs. Cancer, the Yukon Cardiology Health Center 
program, and his latest passion, which is to help families with the 
scourge of autism.
  Coach Calhoun is not just a great coach, he's a really good person. 
To him and his wife, Pat, on behalf of the people of the Second 
Congressional District, I want to extend my congratulations for his 
great leadership and career, and wish them all the success in the world 
as they begin a new chapter in their wonderful lives.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2008092EN.01004301.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/43

---

Action brought on 6 February 2008 — Now Pharma v Commission

Now Pharma

Commission

(Case T-74/08)

(2008/C 92/85)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Now Pharma AG (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: C. Kaletta and I.J. Tegebauer, Rechtsanwälte)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The Court is asked to:

| — | annul Commission Decision C(2007) 6132 of 4 December 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision C(2007) 6132 of 4 December 2007;

| — | hold that the Commission should take a new decision in relation to the applicant's application of 6 February 2007, taking into consideration the Court's view of the law; |
| --- | --- |

—

hold that the Commission should take a new decision in relation to the applicant's application of 6 February 2007, taking into consideration the Court's view of the law;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant challenges the Commission's Decision of 4 December 2007 refusing the applicant's request for designation of the medicinal product ‘Extrait liquide spécial de Chelidonii radix’ (‘Chelidonii radix special liquid extract’) as an orphan medicinal product within the meaning of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 (1).

1

In support of its application, the applicant submits that the contested decision infringes Article 3 of Regulation No 141/2000. In this respect, the applicant submits, in particular, that the final negative opinion of the European Medicines Agency was based on a wrong standard, namely the requirements for marketing authorisation in respect of a medicinal product pursuant to Article 8(3)(c) of Regulation No 141/2000. However, according to the applicant, whether a medicinal product is to be designated as an orphan medicinal product depends on whether the medicinal product will be of significant benefit to those affected by the particular condition, within the meaning of Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 847/2000 (2). According to the applicant, the requirements of Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation No 141/2000 are fulfilled, because the medicinal product constitutes an orphan medicinal product and will be of significant benefit.

2

In addition, the applicant takes issue with the lack of qualifications and the bias of the expert.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products (OJ 2000 L 18, p. 1).

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 847/2000 of 27 April 2000 laying down the provisions for implementation of the criteria for designation of a medicinal product as an orphan medicinal product and definitions of the concepts similar medicinal product and clinical superiority (OJ 2000 L 103, p. 5).

2

---
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of San Jose International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher Greenwood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
6th day of August 2003.

/s/ Christopher Greenwood
--------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
----

----

| 1. | on      October 15th,      2007 (the "Grant      Date"); |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | _________________ (the "Optionee"); |
|----|------------------------------------------|

| 3. | was      granted the option (the "Option") to purchase      _______ common shares without par value (the "Option Shares") of the      Company; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | for      the price (the "Option      Price") of $0.94 per      share; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | which      shall be exercisable ("Vested") as to      ___________________________________; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 6. | terminating      on the October      15th, 2012      (the "Expiry      Date"); |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (a) | the      disclosure to the Toronto Stock Exchange and all other regulatory      authorities of all personal information of the undersigned obtained by the      Company; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b) | the      collection, use and disclosure of such personal information by the Toronto      Stock Exchange and all other regulatory authorities in accordance with      their requirements, including the provision to third party service      providers, from time to time. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | CANADIAN      ZINC CORPORATIONPer:                                                                     Authorized      Signatory |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6392

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CYRUS JONATHAN GEORGE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior

District Judge. (CR-90-78)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 7, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cyrus Jonathan George, Appellant Pro Se. William David Wilmoth,

United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).

2

PER CURIAM:

Cyrus Jonathan George appeals the district court’s order denying his request for Brady* material. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find, that to the extent the

order is reviewable, cf. North Carolina Ass’n of Black Lawyers v.

North Carolina Bd. of Law Examiners, 538 F.2d 547 (4th Cir. 1976),

the denial of the motion was not erroneous. Accordingly, we affirm

the district court’s order. See United States v. George, No. CR-90-

78 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 3, 1998); see also Rule 6(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. We also deny George’s motion to

consolidate this appeal with his earlier appeal in United States v.

George, No. 98-6148 (4th Cir. June 23, 1998) (unpublished), because

this court’s opinion in the earlier appeal has already been filed.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6467]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  SENATE RESOLUTION 570--DESIGNATING NOVEMBER 8, 2012, AS ``NATIONAL 
                       PARENTS AS TEACHERS DAY''

  Mr. Blunt (for himself and Mrs. Murray) submitted the following 
resolution; which was considered and agreed to:

                              S. Res. 570

       Whereas all 50 States and 7 other countries provide 
     services through the Parents as Teachers evidence-based home 
     visiting model for nearly 260,000 children annually, which 
     offers a multifaceted approach to building strong families 
     and promoting a positive parent-child interaction so children 
     are healthy, safe, and ready to learn;
       Whereas Parents as Teachers provides evidence-and research-
     based training that assists parent educators in developing 
     proficiencies in--
       (1) family support and parenting education;
       (2) child and family development;
       (3) human diversity within family systems;
       (4) health, safety, and nutrition; and
       (5) relationships between families and communities;
       Whereas the Parents as Teachers evidence-based home 
     visiting model is an essential component to prepare children 
     to be school ready and narrows the achievement gap between 
     children in poverty and nonpoverty households; and
       Whereas there are more than 3,000 organizations offering 
     Parents as Teachers services across the United States and 
     around the world, which give parents of young children the 
     support and information necessary so all children will learn, 
     grow, and develop to realize their full potential: Now, 
     therefore, be it
       Resolved, That the Senate--
       (1) designates the November 8, 2012, as ``National Parents 
     as Teachers Day'';
       (2) recognizes the importance of parent education and the 
     role the education plays in the development of a child; and
       (3) commends Parents as Teachers for its work with families 
     across the United States.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6061]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mrs. MALONEY:
        H.R. 6421.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2. The Congress shall have 
     Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and 
     Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property 
     belonging to the United States; and nothing in this 
     Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims 
     of the United States, or of any particular State.
```
<PAGE> 


                              EXHIBIT 21.1

               List of Subsidiaries of Belden Inc.

 Belden Wire & Cable Company     (Incorporated in Delaware)

 Belden (Canada) Inc.            (Incorporated in Ontario,      
                                  Canada)

 Belden International, Inc.      (Incorporated in Delaware)

 Belden Electronics S.a.r.l.     (Incorporated in France)

 Belden Electronics GmbH         (Incorporated in Germany)

 Belden UK Limited               (Incorporated in the United    
                                  Kingdom)

 Belden Foreign Sales            (Incorporated in Barbados)
  Corporation

 Belden Holdings, Inc.           (Incorporated in Delaware)

 Belden Europe B.V.              (Incorporated in The        
                                  Netherlands)

 Belden Wire & Cable B.V.        (Incorporated in The       
                                  Netherlands)

 Grupo Belden Mexicana           (Incorporated in Mexico)
  S.A. de C.V.

 Belden Electronics,             (Incorporated in Mexico)
  S.A. de C.V.

 Belden Brasil Comercial LTDA    (Incorporated in Brazil) <PAGE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1533]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             RECOGNIZING THE WORK OF PEOPLE FOR PUGET SOUND

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. ADAM SMITH

                             of washington

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 14, 2012

  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I rise to honor the work of the 
People for Puget Sound organization. For twenty years, this 
organization has been a strong voice for protecting one of the Pacific 
Northwest region's most valuable assets: the Puget Sound. After 
achieving many victories to protect the waterway, People for Puget 
Sound is transferring its programs to other organizations and 
concluding its operations.
  Established in 1991, People for Puget Sound has worked to restore the 
fish and wildlife in the Puget Sound by creating clean and healthy land 
and waters that can be enjoyed by future generations. The organization 
worked to educate people who work and live throughout the Puget Sound 
basin about the shared responsibilities in protecting this resource.
  Throughout its history, People for Puget Sound hosted countless 
events to bring volunteers out to restore habitats. Restoration 
ecologists worked throughout the Puget Sound region to give citizens 
the tools to protect the Sound where they work and live.
  In addition to educating and engaging the public, People for Puget 
Sound has been a fierce advocate for the protection of environmental 
safeguards. For years, volunteers have gathered annually to speak with 
their representatives about steps that could be taken to clean up the 
Puget Sound.
  Mr. Speaker, it is with great honor that I recognize the valuable 
work of People for Puget Sound. Although the organization is 
dissolving, I know the values and dedication of its staff and thousands 
of members from across the region will continue to protect the Puget 
Sound.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of San Jose International (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher Greenwood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of February, 2003.


/s/ Christopher Greenwood
--------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer