alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IVI Communications, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: November 21, 2005            /s/ Charles Roodenburg
                                   ----------------------
                                   Charles Roodenburg, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2



Certifications for Form 10-QSB



I, Daniel L. Erickson, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Alliance Bancshares California;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors:



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |        |  |                         
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2004 |  | Name:  |  | /s/ Daniel L. Erickson  
|                      |  | Title: |  | Executive Vice President
|                      |  |        |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO


TO THE


MCG CAPITAL CORPORATION


2011 SEVERANCE PAY PLAN


WHEREAS, MCG Capital Corporation (the “Corporation”) is the Sponsor of the MCG Capital Corporation 2011 Severance Pay Plan, as amended (the “Plan”); and


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan, the Corporation may amend the Plan at any time; and


WHEREAS, on March 15, 2012, the Corporation approved Amendment Number One to the Plan.


NOW, THEREFORE , the Corporation hereby further amends the Plan, as follows, effective July 27, 2012:


1. Section 1(k) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the same in its entirety and by substituting in its place the following:


(k)    “Employee” means an individual who:  (i) is employed by the Company; (ii) works at least 50% time (i.e., eligible for group benefits); and (iii) either (A) was on the Company’s payroll as of the Effective Date or (B) was hired by the Company after the Effective Date and employed for a continuous period of at least one year.  The term “Employee” shall include any Employee on an approved leave of absence.


2.  Section 1(m) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the same in its entirety and by substituting in its place the following:


(m)    “Executive Employee” means any Employee who, as of the Effective Date or thereafter, is party to an employment agreement or employment letter with the Company and who is entitled to receive severance benefits under such agreement or letter in excess of any wages accrued as of any termination of employment or any Employee who is otherwise designated by the Committee as an Executive Employee. An Executive Employee shall not be eligible to participate in the Plan.


* * * * * * * *


All other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


* * * * * * * *


IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the Corporation has caused this Amendment Number Two to the Plan to be signed by its duly authorized officer to be effective as of the date indicated above.


MCG CAPITAL CORPORATION


By: /s/  Richard W. Neu


Title: Chief Executive Officer


July 27, 2012
# C_2008313EN.01004001.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/40

---

Action brought on 29 September 2008 — IMRO v Commission

(Case T-415/08)

(2008/C 313/72)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Irish Music Rights Organisation Ltd (The) — Eagras um Chearta Cheolta (IMRO) (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: M. Favart, lawyer and D. Collins, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Article 3 of the Commission decision of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA (Case COMP/C2/38.698-CISAC); and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Article 3 of the Commission decision of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA (Case COMP/C2/38.698-CISAC); and

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By means of this application the applicant seeks partial annulment, pursuant to Article 230 EC, of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC) relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA. Precisely, the applicant contests the Commission findings in Article 3 of the contested decision stating that territorial delineations of the reciprocal representation mandates granted by the authors' society to another constitute a concerted practice in violation of Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA.

The applicant puts forward two pleas in law in support of its claims.

First, the applicant submits that the Commission committed an error of assessment, infringed the Article 81 EC and violated its obligation to state reasons foreseen by Article 253 EC by deciding that the parallel territorial delineation included in the reciprocal representation agreements concluded by the applicant and the other CISAC members is the result of a concerted practice. It claims that the level of evidence put forward by the Commission in the decision is insufficient to establish that the parallel conduct is not the result of normal competitive condition but constitutes such a concerted practice. The applicant further states that the presence of the delineation clause in all of its reciprocal agreements is justified by the interest of its members.

Second, in the alternative, the applicant argues that, contrary to the findings of the contested decision, the territorial delineation by CISAC societies in their reciprocal representation agreements is not restrictive of competition within the meaning of Article 81(1) EC because it concerns a form of competition that is not worthy of protection. Nevertheless, to the extent that the alleged concerted practice on territorial delineations should be considered to restrict competition, the applicant claims that it cannot be considered illegal or infringing Article 81(1) EC because it is necessary and proportionate to the legitimate objective of protecting the rights of the societies' members and the authors.

---
**Exhibit 15.1**

April 30, 2013 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

100 F Street N.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

We werepreviously principal accountants for Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited and, under the date of March 27, 2013, we reported on the consolidated financial statements of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited as of and for theyears ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 and the effectiveness of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. On March 27, 2013, we were notified that theauditor-client relationship between KPMG and Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited will cease upon completion of the audit of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the yearended December 31, 2012 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, and the issuance of our reports thereon. On April 30, 2013, we completed our audit and issued our reports that wereincluded in the Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited’s Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012. 

We have readSinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited’s statements included under Item 16F of its annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, and we agree with such statements, except that we are not in a positionto agree or disagree with the statements that: “(1) During the two most recent fiscal years and through April 30, 2013, neither we nor anyone on our behalf consulted PwC regarding either (i) the application of accountingprinciples to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the registrant’s financial statements, or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a “disagreement”(as defined in Item 16F(a)(1)(iv) of Form 20-F and related instructions to Item 16-F of Form 20-F) with PwC or a “reportable event” (as described in Item 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form 20-F)”, and“(2) Also, during the two most recent fiscal years and through April 30, 2013, we have not obtained any written report or oral advice that PwC concluded was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to theaccounting, auditing or financial reporting issue.”
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 449 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 449

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To require the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service to submit 
    to Congress a report on the health effects of new psychoactive 
              substances (including synthetic drugs) use.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Synthetic Drug Awareness Act of 
2018''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON EFFECTS ON PUBLIC HEALTH OF SYNTHETIC DRUG USE.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 3 years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service 
shall submit to Congress a report on the health effects of new 
psychoactive substances (including synthetic drugs) used since January 
2010 by persons who are at least 12 years of age but no more than 18 
years of age.
    (b) New Psychoactive Substance Defined.--For purposes of subsection 
(a), the term ``new psychoactive substance'' means a controlled 
substance analogue (as defined in section 102(32) of the Controlled 
Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802(32)).

            Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 449

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To require the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service to submit 
    to Congress a report on the health effects of new psychoactive 
              substances (including synthetic drugs) use.
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Zvi Alon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NetManage, the Periodic Report, for the
period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.



By:

/s/    ZVI ALONName:

Zvi AlonTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDated:

March 23, 2006




I, Michael R.
Peckham, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NetManage, the Periodic Report, for the period ended
December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.



By:

/s/    MICHAEL R. PECKHAMName:

Michael R. PeckhamTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDated:

March 23, 2006
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC.  


 
 

EXHIBIT 10.02    
    


 
 

Compensation for Non-Management Directors of the Registrant    
    


As of April 5, 2005, non-management Directors of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (the "Registrant") receive an annual cash retainer of $75,000 and are
reimbursed for reasonable travel and related expenses. The annual retainer is paid quarterly; however, the fourth quarter payment will be withheld from any Director who has been a Director for the
full year for failure to attend 75% of the total number of meetings. The chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional annual retainer of $25,000, and each non-management Director
who serves as a chairman of any other Committee of the Board of Directors receives an additional annual retainer of $15,000 per Committee. Each non-management Director who serves as a
Committee member (including as chairman) receives $2,500 per Committee meeting and $1,500 per unanimous written consent. 


An
annual equity retainer in the form of a grant of 2,500 RSUs is made to each non-management Director as of the day of the Company's Annual Meeting of Stockholders. As of each date that a
dividend is paid on the Registrant's common stock, $0.10 par value per share ("Common Stock"), each non-management Director holding RSUs is credited with a number of additional RSUs equal
to the product of (A) the dividend paid on one share of Common Stock, multiplied by (B) the number of RSUs held by the non-management Director, divided by (C) the
closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on such date. The RSUs vest immediately and are payable in Common Stock upon death, disability or termination of service. 


Alternatively,
a non-management Director may elect to receive the annual equity retainer in the form of an option to purchase 7,500 shares of Common Stock, with an exercise price per share
equal to the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date the award is made. Such option has a ten-year term, is not forfeitable, and becomes exercisable in
one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the award date or, if sooner, upon termination of service. 



Mr. Michael
Ainslie also receives an annual cash retainer of $40,000 for serving as a Director of Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, an annual retainer of $10,000 for serving as Chairman of its Audit
Committee and $1,500 per committee meeting and $1,500 per unanimous written consent for serving as a member of its Audit and Compensation and Benefits Committees. 











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.02


Compensation for Non-Management Directors of the Registrant
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, to
such officers knowledge, that:

The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|                         |  |        |                   |                        
|------------------------ |  | ------ | ----------------- | -----------------------
|Dated: February 27, 2004 |  |        | /s/ John R. Weale
|                         |  |       
|                         |  | Name:  |                   | John R. Weale          
|                         |  | Title: |                   | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Report.
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,  for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, in his capacity as an officer of the BFA Liquidation  Trust (the "TRUST"),
that, to his knowledge:

     (a)  the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-Q for the  quarterly  period  ended
          September  30,  2005  as  filed  with  the   Securities  and  Exchange
          Commission  (the  "REPORT"),  fully complies with the  requirements of
          Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Trust.


Date: November 12, 2005             By:      /s/ Clifton R. Jessup, Jr.
                                       -------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Clifton R. Jessup, Jr.
                                    Title: Liquidating Trustee

Date: November 12, 2005             By:    /s/ Mark A. Roberts
                                       -------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Mark A. Roberts
                                    Title: Assistant to the Liquidating Trustee



This certification is not deemed to be "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise  subject to the liability of that
section.  This  certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.


                                       20
Schedule to Change in Control Agreements



 Exhibit 10.13(a) 
  
 Schedule to Change in Control Agreement 
  
 Horace Mann Educators Corporation (“HMEC”) and Horace Mann Service Corporation (“HMSC”) entered into Change in Control
Agreements with the following persons on the dates shown. These agreements are identical to the one included as Exhibit 10.13 to HMEC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and are the same type of agreement as the
one included as Exhibit 10.7 to HMEC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, except that (1) the multiple of the annual base salary and average of annual cash bonus paid to the employee in the last three years and (2)
the specified period during which such employee’s insurance benefits would continue are equal to the duration below. 
  

					
	 Employee

	  	Duration

	  	Agreement Date


	 Frank D’Ambra
	  	1.5 years	  	03-08-2005
Find more data on this and other topics at www.arc.gov/chartbook















	
















 


 


	



64.3%

74.0%

70.6%

73.7%

71.2%

COMPUTER ACCESS SMARTPHONE ACCESS

BROADBAND SUBSCRIPTIONS BROADBAND SUBSCRIPTIONS BY SUBREGION
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1118

YVONNE HICKMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL PUGLISE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. 

(1:12-cv-03577-CCB)

Submitted: April 25, 2013 Decided: April 29, 2013

Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yvonne Hickman, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Puglise, Appellee Pro 

Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Yvonne Hickman appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. See Hickman v. Puglise, 

No. 1:12-cv-03577-CCB (D. Md. Jan. 10, 2013). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED