alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008236EN.01001001.xml

| 13.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Ischia (Italy) lodged on 15 July 2008 — Rosalba Alassini v Telecom Italia SpA

(Case C-317/08)

(2008/C 236/15)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Giudice di Pace di Ischia

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Rosalba Alassini

Applicant:

Defendant: Telecom Italia SpA

Defendant:

Question referred

Do the Community rules in Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Directive 2002/22/EC (1), Directive 1999/44/EC (2), Commission Recommendation 2001/310/EC (3) and Directive 1998/257/EC (4) have direct effect and must they be interpreted as meaning that disputes ‘in the area of electronic communications between end-users and operators concerning non-compliance with the rules on universal service and on the rights of end-users, as laid down in legislation, decisions of the Regulatory Authority, contractual terms and service charters’ (the disputes contemplated by Article 2 of Decision No 173/07/CONS of the Regulatory Authority) must not be made subject to a mandatory attempt at conciliation without which proceedings in that regard may not be brought before the courts, thus taking precedence over the rule laid down in Article 3(1) of Decision No 173/07/CONS?

1

2

3

4

in the area of electronic communications between end-users and operators concerning non-compliance with the rules on universal service and on the rights of end-users, as laid down in legislation, decisions of the Regulatory Authority, contractual terms and service charters

---

(1)  OJ L 108, p. 51.

1

(2)  OJ L 171, p. 12.

2

(3)  Commission Recommendation.

3

(4)  Commission Recommendation.

4

---
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                      IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
                   CALCULATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
  (EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF UNITED STATES DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                              --------------------------
                                                                 1998           1997
                                                              -----------    -----------
                                                               (AUDITED)      (AUDITED)
<S>                                                           <C>            <C>
BASIC
Net income..................................................  $    67,714    $   100,320
Common shares outstanding at January 1, 1998................   25,000,000     25,000,000
Common shares outstanding at December 31, 1998..............   25,033,932     25,017,603
Weighted average common shares outstanding..................   25,031,211     25,010,060
Net income per common share.................................  $      2.71    $      4.01
DILUTED
Net income..................................................  $    67,714    $   100,320
Weighted average common shares outstanding..................   25,031,211     25,010,060
Dilutive effect of share options............................    1,515,851      1,482,341
                                                              -----------    -----------
Total.......................................................   26,547,062     26,492,401
                                                              -----------    -----------
Net income per common share.................................  $      2.55    $      3.79
</TABLE>
 
                                       34
0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

Map Created: October 2009.

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census, SF1

and 1990 Census, STF1A.

Population change is the difference between the 1990 population 

and the 2000 population expressed as a percentage of the 1990 

population. 

Population Change in Appalachia, 1990-2000

(Population Change as a Percentage of the 1990 Population)

50.0% - 123.2%

25.0% - 49.9%

0.0% - 24.9%

-9.9% - -0.1%

-22.4% - -10.0%

Population Change

U.S. average = 13.2%

Appalachian average = 8.8%
# Lincoln - Appalachian Regional Commission

- The Natural Capital Investment Fund: A Path To Success In 2016, the Natural Capital Investment Fund (NCIFund) partnered with the Hatfield McCoy Trail Authority and Southern West Virginia Community and Technical College (Southern) to drive recreational tourism development in the coalfields of southern West Virginia. Through ARC POWER funding, the partners launched a revolving loan fund dedicated to financing and providing business technical assistance [&#8230;]The post The Natural Capital Investment Fund: A Path To Success appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- SWEEP: Training West Virginia’s Entrepreneurs “About 80% of West Virginia businesses have 20 or less employees,” said Alyssa Keedy, the Advanced Career Education Coordinator at the West Virginia Department of Education (WVDE). Why is that the case? One reason is a disconnect between West Virginia workers and the skills needed by local employers. With many young West Virginians either leaving [&#8230;]The post SWEEP: Training West Virginia&#8217;s Entrepreneurs appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Region 2–Planning and Development Council Executive Director Chris Chiles Email &#99;c&#x68;i&#x6c;e&#x73;&#64;&#x72;&#101;&#x67;&#105;o&#x6e;2&#x70;d&#x63;&#46;&#x6f;&#114;&#x67;The post Region 2–Planning and Development Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2008247EN.01002502.xml

| 27.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/25

---

Action brought on 18 July 2008 — Christoph and Others v Commission

(Case F-63/08)

(2008/C 247/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Eugen Christoph (Liggiano, Italy) and Others (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decisions fixing the applicants' conditions of employment inasmuch as the length of their contract or of the renewal thereof is limited to a fixed term.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Commission decisions fixing the applicants' conditions of employment as members of the temporary staff within the meaning of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and, more specifically, inasmuch as they limited the length of their contract; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission decisions fixing the applicants' conditions of employment as members of the temporary staff within the meaning of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and, more specifically, inasmuch as they limited the length of their contract;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4687 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4687

   To designate the health care center of the Department of Veterans 
 Affairs in Tallahassee, Florida, as the Sergeant Ernest I. ``Boots'' 
               Thomas VA Clinic, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2017

Mr. Lawson of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the health care center of the Department of Veterans 
 Affairs in Tallahassee, Florida, as the Sergeant Ernest I. ``Boots'' 
               Thomas VA Clinic, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF A DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS CLINIC IN 
              FLORIDA.

    (a) Designation.--The Health Care Center of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs located at 2181 Orange Avenue in Tallahassee, Florida, 
shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant Ernest I. `Boots' Thomas VA Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the clinic 
referred to in paragraph (1) shall be considered to be a reference to 
the Sergeant Ernest I. ``Boots'' Thomas VA Clinic.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the agreements to the Secretary by email at                     *Secretary@fmc.gov,*                     or by mail, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, Washington, DC 20573. Comments will be most helpful to the Commission if received within 12 days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    , and the Commission requests that comments be submitted within 7 days on agreements that request expedited review. Copies of agreements are available through the Commission's website (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     201414.                

*Agreement Name:*                     ONE/HMM WIN Slot Charter Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd. and MM Co., Ltd.                

*Filing Party:*                     Joshua Stein; Cozen O'Connor.                

*Synopsis:*                     The Agreement authorizes ONE to charter space to HMM in the trade between the U.S. East and Gulf Coasts, and the Indian Subcontinent, the Mediterranean, and the Red Sea.                

*Proposed Effective Date:*                     12/20/2023.                

*Location:**https://www2.fmc.gov/​FMC.Agreements.Web/​Public/​AgreementHistory/​84535.*

Dated: December 22, 2023.

Carl Savoy,

Federal Register Alternate Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-28642 Filed 12-27-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
# C_2012049EN.01000202.xml

| 18.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

(Case C-28/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Articles 28 EC and 29 EC - Free movement of goods - Measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on imports and exports - Transport - Directives 96/62/EC and 1999/30/EC - Sectoral traffic prohibition for lorries of over 7,5 tonnes carrying certain goods - Air quality - Protection of health and the environment - Principle of proportionality - Consistency)

2012/C 49/03

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Oliver, A. Alcover San Pedro and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria (represented by: E. Riedl, G. Eberhard and C. Ranacher, acting as Agents, and L. Schmutzhard and J. Thudium)

Defendant:

Intervening parties in support of the applicant: Italian Republic (represented initially by I. Bruni and subsequently by G. Palmieri, acting as Agents, and G. De Bellis, avvocato dello Stato), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels, Y. de Vries and M. Noort, acting as Agents)

Intervening parties in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 28 EC and 29 EC — Prohibition against driving lorries with a total weight of more than 7.5 tonnes, loaded with certain goods, on a section of the A12 ‘Inntalautobahn’ motorway — Justification of that prohibition under Article 30 EC and the Community legislation relating to ambient air quality

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by prohibiting lorries of over 7.5 tonnes carrying certain goods from using a section of the A 12 motorway in the Inn valley (Austria), the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 28 EC and 29 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by prohibiting lorries of over 7.5 tonnes carrying certain goods from using a section of the A 12 motorway in the Inn valley (Austria), the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 28 EC and 29 EC;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Italian Republic and the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Italian Republic and the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

      I, TIAO TSAN LAI, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer) of Investment Agents, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certifies that
to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2002 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



/s/ Tiao Tsan Lai
----------------------------
Name: Tiao Tsan Lai
Date:  January 22, 2003


                                  Exhibit 99.1
# C_2008223EN.01004801.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/48

---

Action brought on 17 June 2008 — Asenbaum Fine Arts v OHIM (WIENER WERKSTÄTTE)

(Case T-230/08)

(2008/C 223/84)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Asenbaum Fine Arts Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Vögel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Alter the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 10 April 2008 (R 1573/2006-4) so as to allow the applicant's appeal of 29 November 2006 in its entirety, or in the alternative, to allow the appeal for Classes 6, 11 (excluding lamps (electric), fitted lamps, ceiling lamps and floor lamps), 14 (excluding chocolates), 16, 20, 21 (excluding chocolates) and 34;
  In the alternative annul the contested decision and refer the matter back to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to complete the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

Alter the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 10 April 2008 (R 1573/2006-4) so as to allow the applicant's appeal of 29 November 2006 in its entirety, or in the alternative, to allow the appeal for Classes 6, 11 (excluding lamps (electric), fitted lamps, ceiling lamps and floor lamps), 14 (excluding chocolates), 16, 20, 21 (excluding chocolates) and 34;

In the alternative annul the contested decision and refer the matter back to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to complete the proceedings;

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs of the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘WIENER WERKSTÄTTE’ for goods in Classes 6, 11, 14, 16, 20, 21 and 34 (Application No 4 133 501).

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Application rejected.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) in that the trade mark applied for is neither descriptive nor devoid of distinctive character.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Voyager Petroleum, Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sebastien C. Dufort, CEO and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



Date: October 6, 2008                       By: /s/ Sebastien C. Dufort
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Sebastien C. Dufort
                                               Principal Executive Officer
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Reed’s Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Christopher J. Reed,
      Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.











Christopher
      J. Reed,


Chief
      Executive Officer, President


And
      Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      10, 2005
Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2006–2010

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

A college completion rate is the percentage of persons ages 25 

and over with a bachelor’s degree or more. The percent of the 

U.S. average is computed by dividing the county college 

completion rate by the national average and multiplying by 100. 

The map uses critical breaks such as the national average to 

organize the data into groups of common values.

Map Created: October 2013

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2006–2010

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

13.2% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.9% 

100.0% - 178.3%

Percent of the U.S. Average 

(Critical Breaks Classification) 

U.S. average = 27.9%

Appalachian average = 20.7%
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H5746-H5747]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1830
                              AFTER RECESS

  The recess having expired, the House was called to order by the 
Speaker pro tempore (Mr. Nunes) at 6 o'clock and 30 minutes p.m.

[[Page H5747]]

                          ____________________
```
# Habersham - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Georgia Mountains Regional Commission Executive Director Heather Feldman Email &#x68;&#x66;&#101;&#108;d&#x6d;&#x61;&#x6e;&#64;gm&#x72;&#x63;&#46;&#103;a&#x2e;&#x67;&#x6f;&#118;The post Georgia Mountains Regional Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.