Exploring Bright Spots in Appalachian 

Health: Case Studies

Executive Summary

CASE STUDIES

3

OVERVIEW

Longstanding perceptions of Appalachia paint a picture of a monolithic region, one characterized by lowincome communities, lack of education and racial diversity, and limited economic opportunity. The 

reality is that Appalachia is by nature a diverse and complex region of the country, stretching across 

205,000 square miles in 13 states, and home to more than 25 million people. While as a region it has 

faced, and continues to face, greater economic challenges than the rest of the country, statistics show that 

Appalachia has achieved progress or evolved in a number of significant ways over the last decades: 

 Many Appalachian counties are economically distressed, but since 1960, the Region’s poverty 

rate has dropped by almost half—from 31 percent in 1960 to 17 percent in the period 2011–2015 

(compared with a national rate of 15.5 percent in 2011–2015).

 The Region’s population is racially diverse. Many counties are home to large minority 

populations, and, in some counties, black and Latino residents constitute the majority. 

 High school graduation rates have steadily improved since 1960. The Region’s graduation rate is 

now on par with the rest of the country.

Statistics also show that within Appalachia, there is considerable diversity in the socioeconomic 

characteristics of different subregions: 

 Northern Appalachia’s poverty rate is 14.5 percent, compared with Central Appalachia’s rate of 

24.4 percent.

 Minorities make up 31.3 percent of Southern Appalachia’s population. They are 11 percent of 

Northern Appalachia’s.

 In South Central Appalachia, 19.6 percent of the population age 25 and up holds at least a 

bachelor’s degree; in North Central Appalachia, the figure is 14 percent.1

But these differences within the Region are reflective of diversity at the most fundamental level, the 

communities. Appalachian communities vary widely in their characteristics, their resources, and their 

levels of physical, social, and economic health: In the ten Appalachian counties examined for this report, 

the 2014 unemployment rate ranged from a low of 6.2 percent to a high of 12.4 percent, compared with 

the national unemployment rate of 6.2 percent.2 Employment options differ widely from county to 

county, ranging from retail to health services to manufacturing. Some of those counties have a thriving 

arts community, while others draw thousands of outdoor enthusiasts to their hiking trails and other 

outdoor-recreation attractions. 

Although Appalachian communities face different sets of challenges related to their individual 

characteristics, one common challenge many of them are working to address today is poor health 

 1 Poverty, demographic, and education data come from the American Community Survey, 2011–2015. 2 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics, 2014
CREATING A CULTURE OF 

HEALTH IN APPALACHIA Executive Summary | CASE STUDIES

4

outcomes among their residents. Appalachia has higher 

mortality rates in 7 of the leading causes of death in the 

United States: heart disease, cancer, COPD, 

unintentional injury, including drug overdose, stroke, 

diabetes, and suicide.3 The Appalachian Region’s 

number of physically unhealthy days, mentally 

unhealthy days, and prevalence of depression are all 

higher than the national averages for these measures. 

Obesity, smoking, and physical inactivity—risk factors 

for a number of health outcomes—are all higher in 

Appalachia than in the nation overall. The Region also 

has lower supplies of healthcare professionals 

when compared to the United States as a whole, 

including primary care physicians, mental health 

providers, specialty physicians, and dentists. Lower 

household incomes and higher poverty rates—both 

social determinants of health—reflect worse living 

conditions in the Region than in the nation as a whole.

Over the past two decades, the Appalachian Region as 

a whole has made some progress in a number of health 

measures. However, the progress often comes up short 

when compared with the progress made by the United 

States overall, and indicates a widening gap in overall 

health between Appalachia and the nation as a whole.

EXPLORING BRIGHT SPOTS IN 

APPALACHIAN HEALTH

This report, Exploring Bright Spots in Appalachian 

Health: Case Studies, looks at how ten Appalachian 

counties with health outcomes that are better than 

expected—given the counties’ characteristics and 

resources—are using their resources and strengths in 

different ways to address their health challenges. It 

identifies concrete actions these communities are 

taking to improve health and well-being, that others in 

the Region can work to replicate. 

This is the qualitative companion report to the second 

report in the series, Identifying Bright Spots in 

Appalachian Health: Statistical Analysis, which 

described the analysis used to assess how each of the 

420 Appalachian counties scored on 19 health 

indicators, and identified counties with better-than-expected outcomes given their characteristics and 

resource levels.4

Using the average degree to which a county’s observed health outcomes exceeded predicted values, the 

model identified the counties that either did very well on a few measures or exceeded expectations across 

 3 See Health Disparities in Appalachia for more details about health outcomes in the Appalachian Region. 4 See Identifying Bright Spots in Appalachian Health: Statistical Analysis for more details on the analysis.

ABOUT THIS REPORT

This report presents case studies of ten Bright 

Spot counties conducted over a nine-month 

period from September 2016 to May 2017. 

The purpose of the case studies was to identify 

local practices, programs, and policies that may 

be associated with better-than-expected health 

outcomes. However, the case studies were not 

designed to trace causal paths between specific 

practices and specific outcomes. Rather, by 

using the technique of rapid ethnographic 

assessment (see Research Approach in 

Appendix B), the case studies sought to answer 

a more general question: what is happening in 

these counties that might be contributing to 

better-than-expected population health 

outcomes?

A team of researchers and journalists gathered 

extensive background information on each case 

study location, traveled to each county to

interview key informants, and worked together to 

develop both a qualitative assessment of local 

practices and a narrative account of the local 

culture of health. The team interviewed people 

with leadership roles in county government, 

health care, social services, education, 

university extension agencies, business, and the 

ministry. The researchers explored perceptions 

of local health challenges and sought to identify 

practices that were relevant to understanding 

community-level health outcomes.

Throughout the field studies and during followup analysis, the team looked for patterns across 

the ten counties, as well as individual practices 

that might be replicated more widely. 
CREATING A CULTURE OF 

HEALTH IN APPALACHIA Executive Summary | CASE STUDIES

5

many health outcomes. Ultimately, 42 Appalachian counties—the top ten percent of counties in the 

Region—were classified as “Bright Spots.” 

Exploring Bright Spots in Appalachian Health: Case Studies presents in-depth qualitative analyses of ten

Bright Spot counties identified by the statistical analysis; digs deeper to explore local perceptions of 

practices that may be associated with better-than-expected health outcomes; and summarizes promising 

strategies that may be replicable in other communities.

Together, these companion reports:

 Identify Bright Spot counties that exhibit better-than-expected health outcomes given their 

resources; and

 Explore ten Bright Spot counties through in-depth, field-based case studies. 

The reports offer a basis for understanding and addressing health in the Appalachian Region and identify 

factors that support a culture of health in Appalachian communities. They also explore activities, 

programs, and policies that appear to encourage better-than-expected health outcomes.

It is important to note that because the research team only studied counties that were classified as Bright 

Spots, we cannot attest that these conditions and practices distinguish Bright Spot counties from 

Appalachian counties whose outcome measures are not better than expected. To make such a 

determination would require a comparative research design and longer immersion in the field. We can 

say, however, based on previous public health research, that the practices we uncovered tend to be 

associated with better population-level health outcomes. 

The fourth and final report in the series, expected to be published in late 2018, will provide 

recommendations for practical strategies and activities that build on the findings of the first three reports. 

FOSTERING A CULTURE OF HEALTH

For decades, the country’s approach to health has been grounded in providing the best possible medical 

treatment and striving to make that care accessible and affordable. Research, however, shows that there is 

more to health than health care—although that is critically important. Where one lives, learns, works, and 

plays can have a greater impact on health than having access to a doctor. Given this knowledge, health 

systems, civic leaders, employers, community coalitions, and residents are collaborating to create

communities that help people stay healthy in the first place.

RWJF is championing efforts like these to foster a Culture of Health. According to RWJF, building a 

Culture of Health means creating a society that gives every person an equal opportunity to live the 

healthiest life they can—whatever their ethnic, geographic, racial, socioeconomic, or physical 

circumstances happen to be. A Culture of Health recognizes that health and well-being are greatly 

influenced by where we live, how we work, the safety of our surroundings, and the strength and 

connectivity of our families and communities.

Research from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that living in 

communities with inadequate housing, lower income levels, unsafe neighborhoods, limited access to 

food, or substandard education can have a detrimental effect on a person’s health. Efforts to address these 

conditions can improve individual and population health and lead to greater health equity.
CREATING A CULTURE OF 

HEALTH IN APPALACHIA Executive Summary | CASE STUDIES

6

THE BRIGHT SPOT COUNTIES

Progress in the socioeconomic and health spheres are often interrelated if not interdependent, and this is 

no different in Appalachia. The Region’s economy, once highly dependent on mining, forestry, and 

agriculture, has diversified in recent decades, and now includes larger shares of manufacturing and 

professional services, among other industries. The number of high-poverty counties in the Region (those 

with poverty rates more than 1.5 times the U.S. average) declined from 295 in 1960 to 87 when measured 

from 2011 to 2015. However, incomes, poverty rates, unemployment rates, and post-secondary education 

levels continue to lag behind performance at the national level. 

Although the Region as a whole performs poorly on many health outcomes and drivers of health 

compared to the rest of the nation, many Appalachian communities are exceeding expectations on a 

number of health indicators. This report dives deep into ten of those communities to explore the practices, 

programs, and policies that may be leading to their better-than-expected health outcomes.

These ten counties represent each of Appalachia’s five subregions, include eight states, both metropolitan 

and nonmetropolitan areas, and three of ARC’s five economic status classifications (see Table 1 and 

Figure 1). 

 Table 1: Selected Characteristics of Case Study Counties

State County Subregion Census 

Designation

2014 

Population

Economic 

Status5

AL Hale Southern Metropolitan 15,393 Distressed

KY McCreary Central Nonmetropolitan 18,073 Distressed

KY Wayne Central Nonmetropolitan 20,728 Distressed

MS Noxubee Southern Nonmetropolitan 11,240 Distressed

NY Tioga Northern Metropolitan 50,464 Transitional

NC Madison South Central Metropolitan 20,951 At-Risk

PA Potter Northern Nonmetropolitan 17,451 Transitional

TN Sequatchie South Central Metropolitan 14,431 Transitional

WV Grant North Central Nonmetropolitan 11,829 Transitional

WV Wirt North Central Metropolitan 5,810 At-Risk

It is important to note that the Bright Spot counties are not distributed evenly among the Appalachian 

states. The statistical analysis in the accompanying quantitative report determined that Kentucky and 

Mississippi have proportionately more Bright Spot counties than other states. The model did not identify 

any Bright Spot counties in Ohio despite the fact that the state contains 32 Appalachian counties. South 

Carolina and Maryland also had no identified Bright Spot counties.

 5 Fiscal year 2017
CREATING A CULTURE OF 

HEALTH IN APPALACHIA Executive Summary | CASE STUDIES

7 

Figure 1: Map – OMB Designation of Appalachian Bright Spot Counties 

(Metropolitan/Nonmetropolitan) 

While each of the ten counties has a unique health outcomes profile, all performed better than expected on 

premature mortality, injury mortality, and the prevalence of depression in Medicare patients (see Table 2). 

Wayne, Noxubee, and Hale Counties stand out for both the range of outcomes that were better than 

expected and the extent to which the outcomes exceeded expectations. 

GEORGIA

SOUTH 

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

TENNESSEE

OHIO PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

VIRGINIA

NEW YORK

WEST

VIRGINIA

Wirt County, WV

Tioga County, NY

Wayne 

County, KY

McCreary 

County, KY

Potter County, PA

Grant County, WV

Sequatchie County, TN

Madison County, NC

Hale County, AL

Noxubee

County, MS

KENTUCKY

Northern

Southern

Central

South Central

North Central

0 100 50

Miles

Case Study Counties

Metropolitan

Non-Metropolitan
CREATING A CULTURE OF 

HEALTH IN APPALACHIA Executive Summary | CASE STUDIES

8

Table 2: Health Outcomes in the Case Study Counties

Category Indicator

Case Study County Total 

Counties 

Better Than

Expected per 

Measure

WayneNoxubeeHaleWirtSequatchieTiogaMcCrearyPotterMadisonGrant

(Max = 10)

Mortality and 

Morbidity

YPLL 10

Stroke 9

Cancer 7

Injury 10

COPD 9

Heart disease 9

Mental Health

Mentally bad day 5

Suicide mortality 8

Depression 10

Child Health % low birthweight 7

Infant mortality 8

Chronic 

Disease

Diabetes 4

Heart disease 

hospitalization 9

Medicare HCC 9

Obesity 4

Physically bad day 4

Substance 

Abuse

Excessive drinking 7

Poison mortal 8

Opioid Rx 5

Total Better-than-Expected 

Outcomes per County (Max = 19) 16 16 15 14 14 14 14 14 13 12

The expected values for the 19 health outcome measures are based on the regression analysis described in 

the Statistical Analysis companion report. The regression predicted health outcomes for every county in 

Appalachia using 29 health drivers associated with the environment, health behaviors, health care 

delivery system, quality of health care, and social determinants. It then compared actual outcomes with 

expected outcomes and standardized the differences to identify the counties in the top decile in both the 

metropolitan and nonmetropolitan categories. Data in the study cover the years 2008 to 2014.
CREATING A CULTURE OF 

HEALTH IN APPALACHIA Executive Summary | CASE STUDIES

9

A DEEPER LOOK AT THE BRIGHT SPOT COUNTIES

Each of the ten Bright Spot counties has its own particular health-related challenges, available resources 

for dealing with them, and different responses. But there are similarities in the solutions and strategies 

they employed. These fall into six broad categories:

 Community leaders engaged in health initiatives

 Cross-sector collaboration

 Resource sharing

o Transportation

o Food

o Shelter

 Local healthcare providers committed to public health

 Active faith community

 Initiatives to combat substance abuse

Communities, policymakers, and funders who are interested in improving health outcomes could examine 

opportunities focusing on initiatives aligned in these broad categories.

Community Leaders Engaged in Health Initiatives

Sustained, committed leadership is critical to helping communities improve health outcomes. In the ten

Bright Spots studied, we found dedicated leaders who demonstrated resilience honed by decades of 

commitment to making the county a healthy place to live and visit. Each of the counties has a local leader 

or leaders with credibility, know-how, and a drive to make programs successful. These individuals 

include political officials, business leaders, volunteers, and health care workers. Coalitions of citizens 

work together toward a common goal, and even large employers are dedicated to the health and wellbeing of their employees.

Most receive training through formal leadership development programs or informally through local 

organizations or relationships. All appear to get support in a number of areas, including skill 

development, mentoring, encouragement, income assistance, and networking strategies and tools. Groups 

providing support include the U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperative Extension, university 

extension agencies, regional health care providers, regional health departments, area health education 

programs, national faith-based organizations, governments, and nonprofits.

Many leaders have years of experience working together. Groups of leaders and citizens meet face to face 

regularly to discuss health issues in the county and formulate responses. These groups—health coalitions, 

health councils, health consortiums, and community health advisory boards—function in a democratic 

way and are not dominated by any single member. They also form strong networks of communication and 

cooperation. 

Cross-Sector Collaboration

Cross-sector collaboration within a county—or between neighboring counties—is a given in Bright Spot 

communities. In the words of Peggy Bobo Alt, deputy director of emergency services in Grant County,

West Virginia: “Nobody has the resources to take care of everything all the time, so we’re sharing and 

helping, and that has been good here.”
CREATING A CULTURE OF 

HEALTH IN APPALACHIA Executive Summary | CASE STUDIES

10

Collaboration among formal and informal organizations, long-time residents, and relative newcomers 

helps counties stretch and focus local resources while also avoiding wasteful duplication. These 

collaborations are facilitated by a seeming absence of turf wars, minimal competition, and sharing credit 

for accomplishments.

Almost every county studied has formal coalitions that meet regularly. They bring together government 

leaders, health care providers, local churches, and senior centers as well as less formal groups of 

volunteers from food banks, food delivery programs, and after-school programs. A core group of 

dedicated, long-term leaders combine forces to meet community needs.

In many communities, employers recognize the value of a healthy community and healthy employees, 

support comprehensive health insurance plans, wellness programs, and participate in community health 

fairs. In Hale County, Alabama, an industrial board that serves like a Chamber of Commerce to attract 

business also collaborates with the health department and the University of Alabama’s extension office to 

provide health education.

Area Agencies on Aging are frequently central to collaborative efforts, often providing needed resources. 

And social service agencies often collaborate with health providers to ensure access, either by providing 

transportation to health care services or by taking the needed services to clients. Tioga County, New York 

and Potter County, Pennsylvania house a range of service providers in one building, which fosters access 

for social service program beneficiaries as well as communication and cooperation among providers. 

Resource Sharing

Patterns of cooperation and resource sharing differ, but one thread consistently identified in each Bright 

Spot community was a strong network of local volunteers. These volunteers engaged in outreach to 

isolated community members, delivered food, and provided a broad range of services. Each Bright Spot 

community also set aside any differences to achieve core, shared goals. This enables leaders to 

accomplish more with the resources available to them, sometimes pooling resources to more effectively 

meet needs.

Resource sharing includes combining different programs with multiple sources of funding to address local 

challenges. Examples include efforts to keep seniors and youth nourished, sheltered, engaged, and 

healthy. Resource sharing extends to co-sponsorship of expos and fairs where county residents can obtain 

free or subsidized health screenings.

Remote counties that do not have their own health care systems, or local specialty care services, rely on 

multicounty or regional organizations to obtain the health care services they need. This cross-county 

pooling of resources is crucial to residents in otherwise underserved counties.

People interviewed in each of the ten Bright Spot counties stressed the importance of transportation, food, 

and shelter safety nets. Intense poverty and a lack of reliable transportation make it difficult for many in 

these counties to access available food or obtain other services. Children and seniors, in particular, are 

often at risk of going hungry. 

Programs to improve local health generally involve low-cost solutions to address social determinants of 

health, such as providing affordable housing or help with utility bills; access to balanced and healthy 

food; health screenings with follow-ups; and wrap-around substance abuse programs that remove stigma, 

engage the entire community, provide clear information about risks, eliminate easy access to drugs

through prescription take-back programs, and assist with recovery.
CREATING A CULTURE OF 

HEALTH IN APPALACHIA Executive Summary | CASE STUDIES

11

Transportation

Transporting people to services and food sites is a continuing struggle in many counties. Kentucky’s 

Wayne and McCreary counties have formal Rural Transit Enterprises Coordinated programs that run 

scheduled vans covered through Medicaid. In other counties, churches, volunteer organizations, and 

senior centers provide transportation. In Tioga County, New York, cuts in Medicaid eligibility prompted 

the formation of a largely volunteer transportation service called Neighbors Helping Neighbors. 

Food

In Noxubee County, Mississippi, at least a half-dozen programs provide food to low-income children at 

churches and community centers year-round. Churches also provide afterschool food programs for lowincome children. In Wayne County, Kentucky, students grow and harvest fresh fruits and vegetables from 

a four-acre garden originally planted by the school food service director. The Hope Center, also located in 

Wayne County, provides weekend bag lunches to keep children from going hungry on the days when they 

are not in school. 

Shelter

A recent American Hospital Association study shows that housing takes priority over health care when 

resources are tight. Noxubee County, Mississippi; Hale County, Alabama; and Tioga County, New York

all offer programs to address affordable shelter. While some assist residents with utility payments, others 

focus on affordable home ownership.

Local Providers Committed to Public Health

In all ten counties studied, health care providers are essential to the health of the surrounding 

communities. They have long recognized that the health of their patients depends on more than the 

medical care they provide. “We recognized several years ago that we had to go beyond the four walls of 

the hospital,” says Grant Memorial Hospital CEO Mary Beth Barr. “We needed to serve the entire 

community.” 

Residents trust their local providers, whether they are an individual provider, hospital, or service network, 

and whether they are in-community or based in the next county over. While a few counties have an 

established hospital and easy access to emergency services, others rely on the county health department, 

small community hospitals, or a regional clinic network. All provide outreach into the community, and 

most have active regional mental health providers who work with physical health institutions and social 

service agencies.

In McCreary County, Kentucky, strong local volunteer organizations, emergency medical services, and 

the library connect residents to health and social services. More than half of the counties studied hold 

regular health fairs providing basic medical tests and health-related information. Others recognize that the 

location of health services matters a lot. In Madison County, North Carolina, the nonprofit Hot Springs 

Health Program operates four medical centers strategically placed around the county to give residents 

easy access—no one in Madison County has to travel more than half an hour for services. This kind of 

local outreach and commitment may lower cultural and psychological barriers to seeking care. 

Local providers also tend to champion public health-oriented measures such as safe places for walking 

and efforts to combat substance abuse.
CREATING A CULTURE OF 

HEALTH IN APPALACHIA Executive Summary | CASE STUDIES

12

Active Faith Community

Faith-based communities are actively working to promote healthier lifestyles in a variety of ways,

including sharing information, hosting health fairs, providing food to nutritionally insecure families, or 

driving people to medical appointments. They are also involved in providing information and shaping 

attitudes about substance abuse.

In Sequatchie County, Tennessee, 19 local churches have created the Sequatchie Ministerial Association. 

This association helps pay utility bills for struggling families, provides a jail ministry, and operates a food

bank. Various churches in the community provide yoga and meditation classes, potluck dinners, and 

health fairs. In Hale County, Alabama, the health department collaborates with local congregations to 

provide regular screenings in churches or at one of the two area food stores. It distributes flyers about 

health-related events in area churches. According to many people we interviewed, this is especially 

effective given a long tradition of sharing news by word-of-mouth.

Initiatives to Combat Substance Abuse

Like much of the rest of the nation, counties in Appalachia are struggling with a substance abuse 

epidemic. In fact, the poisoning mortality rate in Appalachia (which includes overdose) was 37 percent 

higher than the national rate during the 2008–2014 period. Most of the ten counties are taking creative, 

proactive steps to face the issue head-on. These efforts range from organized substance abuse support 

groups for both addicted persons and their families to initiatives to curb addictive behaviors to low-cost 

disposal sites. Often, these initiatives involve agencies working across sectors. For example, in Grant 

County, West Virginia, the coalition called PITAR—Prevention, Intervention, Treatment, Anti-Stigma, 

and Recovery—comprises representatives from the prosecutor’s office, the sheriff’s department, the drug 

court, and treatment centers, and gathers monthly to discuss solutions. 

Prevention education for adolescents is common. Schools run programs which educate students on the 

dangers of drugs and long-term consequences of substance abuse. In Wirt County, West Virginia, schools 

partner with more than a dozen other agencies to create an annual sober event in which students play 

games and drive golf carts while wearing vision-altering goggles, often called “beer goggles.” Since the 

program began, there have been no alcohol-related auto deaths after prom and graduation. We could not 

measure how it translated to sustained health behaviors at other times. 

Wirt County, West Virginia, also has a “Drug Take Back Day,” during which any resident can dispose of 

old or unneeded medications at a chosen site. The county also has a permanent receptacle in front of the 

courthouse where residents can drop off medications, or any other substance, anonymously. 

Remaining Gaps

The research done for this report also found common challenges, which may suggest key roles that 

remain to be filled by outside entities. For example, many health coalitions are inspired to work among 

youth, but dwindling resources for public education make it increasingly difficult to engage with schools. 

Private investors, health systems, and insurance payers could fill that gap by investing resources in the 

schools. At a broader level, sustaining collaborative work depends on thorough planning, resourceful 

grant-writing, and effective communications—core elements of community capacity that are missing in 

many rural areas. Regional foundations, community development financial institutions, and advocacy 

groups could target investment to capacity building services, not just program delivery.

For example, a comprehensive report from the Walsh Center for Rural Health Analysis released in 

February 2018 recommended that funders—including philanthropies and government agencies—adapt 
CREATING A CULTURE OF 

HEALTH IN APPALACHIA Executive Summary | CASE STUDIES

13

their funding strategies to address barriers to participation in rural places; provide funding opportunities 

for rural communities that are ready for change but lack capacity to apply for grants; identify and grow 

rural leaders by ensuring opportunities for youth engagement and employment; support economic 

development efforts through investments in rural economies beyond the health care sector; and consider 

rural communities as program pilot sites to test interventions on a smaller scale, among other 

interventions that could be adopted in Appalachia. 

IMPROVING HEALTH THROUGHOUT APPALACHIA

The patterns evident in the Bright Spot counties encourage further exploration of strategies that could 

improve health throughout other parts of the Region. Many practices in these ten counties could be 

replicated elsewhere, and some could be replicated at low cost. 

Health councils can be organized wherever local leaders and citizens are willing to join forces to discuss 

community health problems and possible solutions. These councils or coalitions may also foster crosssector collaboration that, in turn, promotes efficient use of resources, diminished competition, and pulling 

together to get things done. 

Many of the programs supporting youth and seniors are also relatively inexpensive given that they are 

often supported by a large volunteer network or existing organizational infrastructure, such as university 

extension agencies. Some efforts to combat substance abuse are also relatively low-cost, such as 

providing safe places to discard unused and outdated drugs, and having courts divert low-level offenders 

into treatment programs.

Other conditions and initiatives are more difficult to replicate, mainly because they are rooted in local 

culture or historical community services. Half of the ten counties studied had a leading health care 

provider with roots in the community and strong ties to the local culture. These included “homegrown” 

publicly owned hospitals or health systems with a record of striving to serve local residents and improve 

population health. They reduce actual and perceived access barriers through outreach and cultural 

identification with the community, commit resources to screening and prevention, create extended 

networks of specialty providers, and help to organize and integrate health promotion efforts at the county 

level.

Practices that may be more difficult to replicate include strong communication networks among local 

leaders, a spirit of cooperation, community solidarity, a willingness to share resources and credit, and 

generous mutual support. These things develop organically over time. However, what may be more easily 

replicable are the organizational elements associated with these community characteristics: 

democratically functioning health councils with broad membership; co-located government, health, and 

social service hubs that aid communication and collaboration; and cooperative ties to regional 

organizations that can generate new ideas without being imposed from outside the community.

It is clear that making health a shared value is necessary to transform a county into a vibrant, healthy

place to live. But concrete action, fostered through sustained leadership and a willingness to work 

together for the benefit of the community, is just as crucial. This report identifies practices that other 

counties may want to consider implementing in order to improve overall health.
CREATING A CULTURE OF 

HEALTH IN APPALACHIA Executive Summary | CASE STUDIES

14 

REFERENCES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2011. "Chapter 9: Access to Health Care, 2011 National 

Healthcare Quality Report." Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

https://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqr11/chap9.html

American Hospital Association. 2017. Fast Facts on U.S. Hospitals 2017. Accessed May 15, 2018. 

https://www.aha.org/statistics/fast-facts-us-hospitals-2017 

Appalachian Regional Commission. 2017. The Appalachian Region. September 1. 

https://www.arc.gov/appalachian_region/TheAppalachianRegion.asp

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2016. Health in the United States, 2016. Accessed May 15, 

2018. 

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus/description.htm

Dewalt, Darren A, Nancy Berkman, Stacey Sheridan, Kathleen Lohr and Michael Pignone. 2004. 

"Literacy and Health Outcomes A Systematic Review of the Literature." Journal of Internal Medicine

12 (December 19): 1228-1239. Accessed July 2017. 

Hamoudi, PhD, Amar, and PhD, Jennifer Beam Dowd. 2013. "Physical Health Effects of the Housing 

Boom: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study." American Journal of 

Public Health 1039-1045.

Hilbrand, Sonja, David A. Coall, Denis Gerstorf, and Ralph Hertwig. 2017. "Caregiving within and

beyond the family is associated with lower mortality for the caregiver: A prospective study." Evolution 

and Human Behavior 397-402.

Holmes, G. Mark, Lane, Nancy, et. al,. 2017. Identifying Bright Spots in Appalachian Health: Statistical 

Analysis. Washington, D.C. Appalachian Regional Commission. 

Marshall, Julie L., Logan Thomas, Nancy M. Lane, G. Mark Holmes, Thomas A. Arcury, Randy 

Randolph, Pam Silberman, et al. 2017. Health Disparities in Appalachia. Appalachian Regional 

Commission. 

NORC Walsh Center for Rural Health Analysis. 2018. Exploring Strategies to Improve Health and Equity 

in Rural Communities. Accessed May 15, 2018. 

http://www.norc.org/Research/Projects/Pages/exploring-strategies-to-improve-health-and-equity-in-ruralcommunities.aspx 

Office of Management and Budget. 2013. "Revised Delineations of Metropolitan Statistical Areas, 

Micropolitan Statistical Areas, and Combined Statistical Areas, and Guidance on Uses ofthe Delineations 

of These Areas." OMB Bulletin 13-01. Accessed May 15, 2018. 

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/bulletins/2013/b-13-01.pdf 

Plough, Alonzo L. 2015. Measuring What Matters: Introducing a New Action Framework. November 11. 

http://www.rwjf.org/en/culture-of-health/2015/11/measuring_what_matte.html 

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Commission to Build a Healthier America. 2014. Time to Act: 

Investing in the Health of Our Children and Communities. Accessed May 15, 2018. 

https://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/reports/2014/rwjf409002