alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Copa Airlines

0816-06819

Panamá, Rep. Panamá

Tarifas

March 31, 2013

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

To Whom It May Concern,

In the past fifteen years, airlines have revolutionized their direct channels by merchandizing their 

products more effectively through the internet; but the major distribution channel, travel agencies, 

remains steady. Travel agencies utilize a technology platform based on EDIFACT technology, which was 

designed when propeller planes dominated the skies. This technological infrastructure presents many 

constraints for airlines to push merchandising through their travel agents, deal with customers equally 

along all channels, and mitigate the presence of unproductive practices from travel agents.

Airlines need to be able to merchandise their products and services in an efficient way through their 

biggest distribution channel, traditional agencies. In the current GDSs system, travel agents can only 

provide passengers with base fare and availability from the airline. Special offers and/or promotions 

based on passenger’s profile (frequent flyer status, etc) cannot even be considered. New Distribution 

Capability (NDC) allows a common messaging standard based on XML (the same standard used on the 

internet) that is robust enough to support both complete offers and the ability of airlines to customize 

their offers to meet individual traveler needs. 

These individual traveler’s needs are being addressed effectively by airlines through their own 

websites, in which they are able to display information about fare alternatives, ancillary services, onboard amenities and graphics such as pictures or seat maps. However, in the dominant distribution 

channel, passengers can only base their decisions on the two factors that have driven the industry to 

commoditization: price and availability, and as a result, this has created an environment of 

asymmetrical information between the indirect and direct channels for passengers.

Finally, the XML messaging standards would allow airlines to have more effective controls over 

unproductive practices of the agents such as churning or non-cancelled segments, which in turn will 

lead to better availability and fares for the end user. 
Once the NDC is adopted, it will result in airlines competing directly with one another not only on 

fares, but on product and service offerings, and on an infrastructure that is current and robust enough 

to satisfy the needs of a more dynamic, savvy and demanding traveler. 

Best Regards,

Yon I. Jayo

Third Party Distribution Manager

Copa Airlines

 yjayo@copaair.com

 (507) 304-2782

 (507) 6450-7633
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, James G. Stewart, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/Aof Advanced Cell Technology, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             [Not applicable]

 

c)              Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

d)             Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Dated: March 29, 2006 |   | /s/ James G. Stewart |
|-----------------------|--------|----------------------|
|                  |   |                 | James G. Stewart |
|                  |   |                 | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA-2013 - 0835 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM095AD 8 -28 - 35, R C --- 1/14/13 8 -28 - 36, RC --- 10/7/09 8 -28 - 39, RB --- 8/19/09 8 -28 -41, RB --- 8/8/12 8 -28 -42, RA --- 10/1/08 8 -28 -43, RA --- 6/25/09 8 -28 -44, RB --- 7/25/09 8 -28 -47 --- 5/2/08 8 -28 -48, RA --- 7/27/12 8 -28 -49, RA --- 7/23/12 8 -28 - 52 --- 11/3/09 8 -28 - 55 --- 7/23/12 8 -28 - 56 --- 7/23/12 8 -28 - 58 --- 7/25/11 8 - 57 -44, RD --- 10/8/08 CREDIT 8 -28 - 53 --- 11/3/08 8 -28 -49 --- 10/1/10 8 -28 -48 --- 10/1/10 8 -28 -43 --- 8/10/06 8 -28 -41, RA --- 4/11/07 8 -28 -44 , RA --- 11/15/06 8 -28 -44 --- 8/9/06 8 -28 - 39 

### , RA --- 3/15/07 MODSUM 8Q101511, RC --- 1/30/09 MODSUM 8Q101513, RD --- 8/16/06 MODSUM 8Q101652, RF --- 3/10/11 MODSUM 8Q101865, RB --- 5/26/08 MODSUM 8Q101907, RB --- 9/10/10 MODSUM 8Q101908, RB --- 9/10/10 MO DSUM 8Q101916, RA --- 10/19/10 MODSUM 8Q901117, RC --- 3/23/09 MODSUM 8Q902064, RG --- 3/10/11 MODSUM 8Q902091, RC --- 12/22/06 MODSUM 8Q902122, RF --- 12/8/11 MODSUM 8Q902144, RE --- 6/17/09 MODSUM 8Q902382, RB --- 9/10/10 MODSUM 8Q902383, RB --- 9/10/10CR 828CH00020, I9 --- 1/17/08

CR 828CH00027, I17 --- 4/20/06 CR 828CH00029, I2 --- 11/22/94 CR 828CH00044, I2 --- 12/8/97 CR 828SO00006, I24 --- 3/6/97 SOO 8061, I42 --- 6/5/03 SOO 8061, I41 --- 3/14/01 SOO 8062, I15 --- 1/6/86 SOO 8098, I16 --- 5/29/90 SOO 8099, I9 --- 1/7/86 SOO 8155, I48 --- 1/19/07 SOO 8155, I46 --- 2/17/00 Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                                 NETMANAGE, INC.
                       STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF COMMON
           SHARES AND EQUIVALENTS AND NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE (1)
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                           ------------------------------------
                                                              1996           1995          1994
                                                           ------------------------------------
<S>                                                        <C>            <C>           <C>
Net income (loss)                                          $(5,705)       $22,297       $17,815
                                                           ====================================
Weighted average common equivalent shares:
   Weighted average common shares outstanding               42,341         40,749        39,137
   Common stock option grants                                   --          2,206         1,966
                                                           ------------------------------------
Total weighted average common shares and equivalents        42,341         42,955        41,103
                                                           ====================================

Net income (loss) per share                                $ (0.13)       $  0.52       $  0.43
                                                           ====================================
</TABLE>


(1)   Computations adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock dividends effected
      May 1994 and April 1995.

                                      F-1
# Owsley - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Kentucky River Area Development District Executive Director Michelle Allen Email michel&#108;&#101;&#64;&#107;&#114;&#97;&#100;&#x64;&#x2e;&#x6f;&#x72;&#x67;The post Kentucky River Area Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

705.1 OP 12-01200 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF WALLACE DRAKE, PETITIONER,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HON. JOSEPH E. FAHEY, ONONDAGA COUNTY COURT JUDGE AND KELLY REDMORE, CLERK OF THE ONONDAGA COUNTY COURT, RESPONDENTS.

WALLACE DRAKE, PETITIONER PRO SE.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK BRADY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department pursuant to CPLR 506 [b] [1]) to prohibit the enforcement of a resentence.
It is hereby ORDERED that said petition is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this original CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking relief in the nature of prohibition to prevent respondents from enforcing his resentencing. “The record establishes that petitioner failed to effect personal service of the notice of petition and petition upon . . . the Attorney General ( see [] CPLR 307 [1], [2]; 403 [c]), and similarly failed to seek an order to show cause to authorize his use of service by mail in lieu of personal service ( see [] CPLR 308 [5]; 7804 [c]). Petitioner therefore failed to acquire personal jurisdiction over respondent[s] ( see [] CPLR 7804 [c]; Matter of Kelly v Scully , 152 AD2d 698)[, and] . . . th[at] fatal jurisdictional defect requires dismissal of the proceeding” ( Matter of Bottom v Murray , 278 AD2d 817, 817).
Dismissal of the proceeding is also required on the ground that petitioner failed to join and serve the Onondaga County District Attorney, a necessary party to this proceeding ( see CPLR 1003, 7804 [i]; Matter of Barnwell v Breslin , 46 AD3d 990, 991; Matter of Thomas v Justices of Supreme Ct. of State of N.Y., Queens County , 304 AD2d 585, 585-586; Matter of Arkim v Dillon , 222 AD2d 1116, 1116).
Based on our determination, we do not reach petitioner’s-2- 705.1 OP 12-01200
remaining contentions.

Entered: June 28, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
# Haralson - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Northwest Georgia Regional Commission Executive Director Boyd Austin Email &#98;&#x61;&#117;&#x73;&#116;&#x69;&#110;&#x40;&#110;&#x77;&#103;&#x72;c&#x2e;o&#x72;gThe post Northwest Georgia Regional Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2005–2009

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

A high school completion rate is the percentage of persons ages 

25 and over with a high school diploma or more. The percent of the 

U.S. average is computed by dividing the county high school 

completion rate by the national average and multiplying by 100. 

The map uses critical breaks such as the national average to 

organize the data into groups of common values.

Map Created: October 2013

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2005–2009

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

64.1% - 74.9%

75.0% - 84.9%

85.0% - 99.9%

100.0% - 109.0%

Percent of the U.S. Average 

(Critical Breaks Classification) 

U.S. average = 84.6%

Appalachian average = 82.3%
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

Page - 1

I. GENERAL

District: Monterey Bay Unified APCD Date Adopted: 4/20/05 

Rule No: Rule 904 Regulation Title: Trade Secrets - Procedure

when Inspection is Requested 

Date Submitted To ARB: 2/23/05 Date Last Amended or Revised: 3/8/84 

Pollutants Regulated By This Rule (Check): 

 NOx SO2 PM10 VOC _ TAC (Name of TAC) 

Is this rule intended to be sent to the EPA as a SIP revision? X Yes No.

SUMMARY OF RULE CHANGES: New rule ? Amended rule

Rule Repealed.

 

II. NET EFFECT ON EMISSIONS Increase Decrease X No change N/A

Emissions reduction commitment in SIP for this source category: 0.0 tons/year 

SCC/CES Code(s) Affected: na 

 Affected SIC Code(s): na 

Inventory Year to Calculate Changes in Emissions: na Affected Area: 

Future Year Control Profile Estimate ( VOC emissions): N/A

Tons/Year Baseline

Reductions Tons/year Control Percent Control Control

 Year (increases) Subject to Rule Level Control Level Factor

 N/A / = * 100 = % 1.00 - = 

 / = * 100 = % 1.00 - = 

 / = * 100 = % 1.00 - = 

 

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS District is: Attainment Nonattainment X Split

Approximate number of minor (<100 TPY) sources controlled by rule: na . Percent in nonattainment

area: na .

Number of major (? 100 TPY) sources controlled: NONE . Percent in nonattainment area: 0%
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

Page - 2

Location of Major Sources by City: N/A

 

IV. EMISSIONS REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY N/A

Does rule include emission limits that are continuous? Yes; X No. 

If yes, those limits are in Section(s) N/A of the rule.

Other methods in the rule for achieving emissions reductions are: 

 

 

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS The rule contains:

1) Emission limits in Section(s) N/A .

2) Work practice standards in Section(s) na .

3) Record keeping requirements in Section(s) na .

4) Reporting requirements in Section(s) na .

 

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN X No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts Attainment

DISCUSSION:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 3 (Thursday, January 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28958]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health in AD/ADRD and 
Disparities.
    Date: February 27, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Carmen Moten, Ph.D., M.P.H., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301-402-7703, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#81e2eceef5e4efc1ece0e8edafefe8e9afe6eef7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4427292b30212a0429252d286a2a2d2c6a232b32">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 28, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-28958 Filed 1-3-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; K76 Beeson Review.                    

*Date:*                         March 7, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Gianina Ramona Dumitrescu, Ph.D., M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 4193-C, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-827-0696,                         *dumitrescurg@csr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 28, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-28959 Filed 1-3-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
(C) 

041. Vt. IA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0313

JAMES T. and ELIZABETH GRUBA, and

LEO G. and JEANNE R. BARSANTI,

Petitioners and Appellants,

v.

MONTANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,

and NORTHWESTERN ENERGY,

Respondents and Appellees.

FILED

AUG 2 5 2020

Bovven Greenwood Clerk of 

Steusa 

Supreme Court O kontaria R

This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Appellees to strike Appellants'

filing with this Court excerpts from the administrative proceeding transcript that were not

before the District Court.

Appellees raise two arguments as to why the transcript excerpts should be stricken:

(1) these excerpts should not be considered part of the record on appeal under M. R. App.

P. 8(1) because they were not filed in the District Court; and (2) this matter is before this

Court as an appeal from a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and the

transcripts are irrelevant to that issue.

Appellants oppose the motion to strike and argue the only reason the transcript was

not before the District Court was because Appellant Montana Public Service Commission

(PSC) failed to transmit the entire record as required by § 2-7-702(4), MCA, thereby

forcing Appellees to obtain these excerpts for this appeal at their own expense. Appellants

argue that their due process rights would be violated if they are not permitted to file these

excerpts with this Court.

Under M. R. App. P. 8(1), and except as otherwise provided by the Montana Rules

of Appellate Procedure, the record on appeal consists of the original papers and exhibits

filed in the district court, the transcript of the [district court] proceedings, and a certified

08/25/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0313
copy of the docket. Since the administrative proceeding transcript was not before the

District Court, it is not properly before this Court on appeal unless it falls under an

exception to this Rule. Although Appellants further argue that the PSC is at fault for the

lack of transcript at the District Court level, we are not persuaded that the lack of such

transcript bears any relevance to the appeal before this Court. The District Court dismissed

Appellants' request for judicial review of a final order of the PSC because it determined

that Appellants failed to exhaust their administrative remedies. Therefore, the court

concluded that it lacked the subject matter jurisdiction to consider the matter. Appellants

have not demonstrated that the offered excerpts from the transcript of the administrative

proceedings have any bearing upon the issue of whether the District Court's dismissal for

failure to exhaust administrative remedies was legally correct.

THEREFORE,

IT IS ORDERED that Appellees' Motion to Strike the excerpts of the transcript

from the underlying administrative proceeding is GRANTED.

The Clerk is directed to give notice of this Order to all counsel of record.

Dated thisZ6-day of August, 2020.

Chief Justice

(9-;/ - M 414_