### 37176 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 119 / Thursday, June 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules

TABLE 

### 2 B TO 

### A PPENDIX 

### A OF 

### S UBPART 

### A—DATA 

### E LEMENTS FOR 

### R EPORTING 

### E MISSIONS 

### F ROM 

### P OINT 

### , N ONPOINT


### , O NROAD 

### M OBILE AND 

### N ONROAD 

### M OBILE 

### S OURCES 

### , W HERE 

### R EQUIRED BY 

### 40 CFR 51.30—Continued

Data elements Point Nonpoint Onroad Nonroad

(18) Percent Control Approach Penetration (where applicable) ..................................... .................... Y ........

............ ....................

■ 12. Amend § 51.122 by:

■ a. Revising paragraph (c);

■ b. Removing and reserving paragraph (d); and

■ c. Revising paragraph (f).

The revisions read as follows:

**§ 51.122 Emissions reporting requirements for SIP revisions relating to**  **budgets for NO** X **emissions.**
* * * * *

(c) Each revision must provide for periodic reporting by the state of NO X emissions data to demonstrate whether the state’s emissions are consistent with the projections contained in its approved SIP submission. The data availability requirements in § 51.116 must be followed for all data submitted to meet the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section.

* * * * *

(f) Reporting schedules. Data collection is to begin during the ozone season 1 year prior to the state’s NO X SIP Call compliance date.

[FR Doc. 2013–14628 Filed 6–19–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0362; FRL–9815–4]**

**Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San Diego Air**  **Pollution Control District**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the San Diego Air Pollution Control District (SDAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from architectural coatings. We are proposing to approve a local rule to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).

**DATES :**  Any comments on this proposal must arrive by July 22, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA–R09– OAR–2013–0362, by one of the following methods: 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions.

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.

Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov

, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or email. www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.

Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105–3901. While all documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the **FOR**
**FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** section.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947– 4126, law.nicole@epa.gov

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  This proposal addresses the following local rule: San Diego APCD Rule 67.0 Architectural Coatings. In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register , we are approving this local rule in a direct final action without prior proposal because we believe this SIP revision is not controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments in subsequent action based on this proposed rule. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further information, please see the direct final action.

Dated: May 6, 2013. Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2013–14514 Filed 6–19–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 372**

**[EPA–HQ–TRI–2012–0110; FRL–9819–1]**

**RIN 2025–AA34**
**Addition of Nonylphenol Category; Community Right-to-Know Toxic**  **Chemical Release Reporting**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  EPA is proposing to add a nonylphenol category to the list of toxic chemicals subject to reporting under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) of 1986 and section 6607 of the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA) of 1990. EPA is proposing to add this chemical category to the EPCRA section 313 list pursuant to its authority to add chemicals and chemical categories because EPA believes this category meets the EPCRA section 313(d)(2)(C)