alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                     309
<SECURITIES>                                                17
<RECEIVABLES>                                             6705
<ALLOWANCES>                                              (184)
<INVENTORY>                                               4567
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         11806
<PP&E>                                                   15936
<DEPRECIATION>                                           (7553)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           25131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    11087
<BONDS>                                                   6035
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                    49
<OTHER-SE>                                                6987
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             25131
<SALES>                                                  24735
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         25030
<CGS>                                                    20411
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            20411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          4374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           184
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         789
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (638)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (638)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (0.14)


</TABLE>
Toys "R" Us, Inc. exhibit 10.1 8K040405



Exhibit 10.1





	TO:  		 COMPENSATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (“COMMITTEE”) OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TOYS “R” US, INC.
			
	FROM:		 JOHN H. EYLER
			
	DATE:		 MARCH 29, 2005
			
	SUBJECT:		 STOCK OPTION GRANTS



 





        Reference is made to Section 2 (b)(vi) of the Retention Agreement (the “Agreement”) between Toys “R” Us, Inc. (the “Company”) and John H. Eyler, Jr. (“Executive”), dated January 6, 2000, pursuant to which the Company
is required to grant to Executive, as of April 1 each year, stock options to acquire not less than 300,000 shares of common stock of the Company (the “Grant”).





        In light of the pending sale of the Company, the Executive hereby expressly waives his rights to the Grant to be made as of April 1, 2005.  This letter agreement shall not be deemed to constitute a waiver for any Grant to be made in any other year.








        Agreed to as of the day and year first written above.





		/s/ John H, Eyler, Jr.____
		John H. Eyler, Jr.
#### ARMSTRONG v. STATE.

No. A-11674.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

March 18, 1953.

■ Ira Monroe, Clinton, for plaintiff.

Mac Q.. Williamson, Atty. Gen., and Fred E. La Rue, Co. Atty., Arapaho, for defendant.

PER CURIAM.

The above styled and numbered matter having come on for further hearing on petition for rehearing, ánd after oral argument thereon, the Criminal Court of Appeals is of the opinion, that it was prejudicial to the substantial rights of the defendant and denied him a fair trial to admit the evidence of the liquor obtained by reason of the void1 search warrants because the- evidence of defendant’s guilt of possession of the liquor seized in the search of the tourist cabin was-not so clear and convincing that this court can conclude the defendant- would have been convicted if the improper evidence had not been received. The court is therefore of *537the opinion that the opinion heretofore rendered should be vacated and set aside, with directions to vacate the judgment and sentence herein involved and to re-try the defendant on the evidence involving the liquor obtained in the search of the cabin alone.

The judgment and sentence of the county court of Custer County is therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial.
October 2, 2015

Mr. Zachary Brown

426 NE Fargo Street

Portland, OR 97212

Dear Mr. Brown:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2800 on July 8, 2015, 

but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
MEMORANDUM

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0790

FROM: Mary Johnson, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD

DATE: November 2012

SUBJECT: Record of Contact with National Renderers Association 

Area Source Industrial/Commercial/Institutional 

Boilers

On November 28, 2012, Mr. Doug Irvin contacted Dr. Robert

Wayland of the EPA, on behalf of the National Renderers 

Association (NRA), to inquire whether EPA received the NRA’s 

February 21, 2012 docket submission of their comments regarding 

the December 23, 2011 proposed reconsideration of the final Area 

Source Boiler Rule. Specifically, Mr. Irvin referenced the NRA’s 

request for consideration of a processed fats fuel subcategory 

that would be exempt from the Area Source Boiler Rule. On 

November 28, 2012, Dr. Wayland replied, on behalf of EPA, that 

we received the submission and are in the process of evaluating 

the comments and requests of the NRA’s submission along with 

submissions from others in the course of EPA’s reconsideration 

proceeding, and that EPA plans on addressing the issues raised 

when we take final action on our reconsideration.
# Blount - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Regional Planning Commission of Greater Birmingham Executive Director Charles Ball Email &#x63;&#x62;&#x61;&#x6c;&#108;&#64;&#114;&#112;cgb&#x2e;&#x6f;&#x72;&#x67;The post Regional Planning Commission of Greater Birmingham appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET  AS OF  DECEMBER  31,  1998  AND  THE  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,881
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,211
<ALLOWANCES>                                       720
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,274,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 185,580
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,460,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        696,668
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           491
<OTHER-SE>                                     715,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,460,429
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               169,568
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,778
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 95,717
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             95,717
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    95,717
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.00
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1544]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  HONORING REV. DR. MYRTLE OWENS SMITH

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. ELIOT L. ENGEL

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 14, 2012

  Mr. ENGEL. Mr. Speaker, America was settled by people with a strong 
belief in God. To this day that conviction has carried through with 
churches in all neighborhoods of our country forming a bond that holds 
them and us together.
  Here in the Bronx we have one such church, the Emmanuel Baptist 
Church, under the inspired pastoring of the Rev. Dr. Myrtle Owens Smith 
who is celebrating her tenth anniversary as Pastor of the church.
  She is the first female black pastor of the Emmanuel Baptist Church 
and in her decade of service to her flock she has honored the past by 
renovating the church to keep its historical heritage and while 
enhancing the future by planning the installation of solar panels.
  Rev. Dr. Smith is a community oriented minister who regularly attends 
Community Board meetings, donated a new kitchen for the church, 
maintains excellent relationships with local elected officials, 
accommodates community mission outreach programs such as Soup and Sock 
Ministry and provides food and clothing and HIV testing. She also 
encourages a thriving Youth Ministry and, on a broader front, was the 
first female pastor asked by the Foreign Mission Board to accompany 
them to Ghana.
  This is the tip of the iceberg regarding Rev. Dr. Myrtle Owens Smith 
and her spiritual and corporal contributions to her community. I join 
with her congregants in congratulating her on ten wonderful and 
fruitful years and with them wish her many more years pastoring her 
flock.

                          ____________________
```
# •m . 

# Q U.S . Departmen t 80 0 Independenc e Ave. , S.W . o f Transportatio n Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Septembe r

8 , 200 9 VI A FACSIMIL EAN D REGULA RMAI L Mary A . Schu , Presiden t Desert Wing s Je t

Cente r L.L.C . Spiri t Fligh t Inc . db aWing s o f

th e Cascade s 77 7 S.E . Salmo n Avenu e ^ Redmond , Orego n 9775 6 " O Steve n D . Bryant , Esq . Bryant , Emerso n & Fitch , LL P;. | 88 8 S . W . Evergree n Avenu e ' g P.O . Bo x 45 7 § ^ Redmond , Orego n 9775 6 : ^ g RE : Desert

Wing s v . City o f

Redmon d FA A Docke t

N o 16-09-0 7 Reques t for Extensio n o f

Tim e Dea r Ms . Schu an dMr . Bryant: Vi aafacsimil e date dAugus t 31,2009 , Mar y Schu requeste dathirty (30 ) day extensio n o f tim e t o fil e he r Repl y i n th e above-reference dmatter . I n arespondin g email , Mr . Bryant , a s counse l for th e City , state dth e City ha dn o objectio n t o th e extensio n request . Accordingly , th e reques t

for a n extensio n i s granted . Th e complainant' s Repl y i s no w du e o n Septembe r

30 , 2009 . Th e responden t ma y fil e aRebutta l withi n te n day s o f th e dat e o f

servic e o f

th e Reply . Sincerely , 

## ^jdeA-^ ElizabethNewman Attorney , Airport s La w Branc h cc : Part 1 6 Airport

Proceeding s Docke t ACO-lO OCERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E

I HEREB Y CERTIF Y that o n September^ , 2009, 1 cause dt o b e place di n th e Unite dState s mai l (firs t clas s mail , postag e paid ) o r personally delivered , atru e cop y o f th e foregoin g documen t addresse dto : Mary A . Schu , Presiden t Deser t Wing s Je t

Cente r L.L.C . Spiri t Fligh t Inc . db aWing s o f

th e Cascade s 77 7 S.E . Salmo n Avenu e Redmond , Orego n 9775 6 (Fax 541/548-2776 ) Steve n D . Bryant , Esq . Bryant , Emerso n & Fitch , LL P 88 8 S . W . Evergree n Avenu e P . O . Bo x 45 7 Redmond , Orego n 9775 6 (Fax 541/548-1895 ) Han ddelivere dcopie s to : FAA Par t 1 6 Airport

Proceeding s Docke t ACO-lO O

Sharic e Jeffersbir

Airport s & Environmenta l La w Divisio n Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-21-00075-CR 

 

THOMAS RAY MAYHEW, APPELLANT 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 320th District Court 

 Potter County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 58,954-D, Honorable Pamela C. Sirmon, Presiding 

June 30, 2021 

ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. 

In 2009, appellant Thomas Ray Mayhew was convicted of criminal trespass and 

sentenced to sixty days’ confinement in county jail. On March 22, 2021, the trial court 

signed a nunc pro tunc judgment of conviction. Appellant appeals pro se, from the nunc 

pro tunc judgment. Because the clerk’s record has yet to be filed, we remand the cause

for further proceedings. 

The appellate record was originally due May 21, 2021. The reporter’s record,

transcribing appellant’s 2009 plea hearing, has been filed. The clerk’s record has not 
2

been filed, however, because appellant has not paid for its preparation. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 35.3(a)(2). By letter of May 28, 2021, we directed appellant to make payment

arrangements for the clerk’s record by June 11. Failure to do so, we advised, would result 

in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further 

proceedings. Appellant has failed to make payment arrangements for the clerk’s record

to date.

Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(2). Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means it 

finds necessary to determine the following:

(1) whether appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;

(2) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to have the clerk’s record 

furnished without charge (along with appellate counsel); and

(3) if appellant is not entitled to have the clerk’s record furnished without 

charge, the date appellant will make acceptable payment arrangements for

the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.2.

The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the 

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a clerk’s 

record and cause that record to be filed with this court by July 30, 2021. Should further 

time be needed to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before July 30,

2021.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Houston Progressive Radiology Associates, PLLC, Rodolfo L. Garcia and Brandon C. Stroh v. Stephen B. Lee, M.D.. P.A. a Texas
Professional Association , Dean Paul Ch auvin, Jr., M.D., P.A., a Texas Professional Association, and Michael Nguyen, M.D.

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00467

- CV

Trial court case number: 2014

- 12279

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

On June 30, 2014, counsel for appellant Houst on Progressive Radiology Associates, PLLC filed an Unopposed Motion to Substitute Counsel. A motio n to substitute counsel must be

delivered to Houston Progressive Radiology Associates, PLLC “in person or mailed

— both by certified and by first

- class mail” i n order to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5(b), (d). The motion does not indicate that it was delivered to Houston Progressive Radiology Associates, PLLC in person or by mail . The motion is DENIED , without prejudice to refiling.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Actin g individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 22, 2014
#### W. E. SURRATT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Oklahoma and the County Attorney of Garfield County, Oklahoma, Respondents.

No. A-13120.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Oct. 18, 1961.

*752W. E. Surratt, pro se.

Robert L. Gregory, County Atty., Garfield County, Enid, for respondents.

BUSSEY, Judge.

This is an application for a writ of mandamus by W. E. Surratt, an inmate of the State Penitentiary at McAlester, Oklahoma, requesting that he be accorded a preliminary hearing in the District Court of Garfield County, Oklahoma, or that charges there pending against him be dismissed.

 In December, 1958, petitioner entered a plea of guilty to a charge of Armed Robbery and he was sentenced by the District Court of Tulsa County to serve 7 years confinement in the State Penitentiary. Thereafter the County Attorney of Garfield County, Oklahoma, filed a charge of “Robbery with Firearms” against the petitioner and a hold order was placed with the warden of the State Penitentiary setting out the aforementioned offense. This court has repeatedly held that under such conditions either .the state of the accused may proceed in the District Court of the County where charges were filed by way of habeas corpus ad prosequendum and should all efforts fail, original proceedings may be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals. However, where a writ of habeas corpus ad prose-quendum has been filed either by the state of accused and such matter is pending in the District Court, this court will not grant a writ of mandamus for the reason that petitioner has a remedy in the lower court.

The record in this case indicates that petitioner did apply for such writ and that the matter is now pending in the District Court of Garfield County, Oklahoma. It further appears from the response filed by Robert L. Gregory, County Attorney in and for Garfield County, Oklahoma, that he is ready and willing to try said petitioner at the next regular docket of the District Court of Garfield County. Mr. Gregory further advised this Court that he will join with the petitioner in his request for speedy trial on the hearing for habeas corpus now pending in the District Court of Garfield County.

The proceedings are hereby dismissed.

NIX, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5870]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT FOR RETURNING VETERANS

  (Mr. HIGGINS asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mr. HIGGINS. Mr. Speaker, tonight, I will join Members of Congress 
Mike Quigley and Pat Meehan in an ice hockey game with and to benefit 
the wounded warriors. The Wounded Warriors is a great organization that 
takes care of our returning injured soldiers. Congress, however, is not 
living up to its responsibility to do the same.
  The unemployment rate for returning veterans under the age of 24 is 
29 percent. Congress just approved $53 billion for road and bridge 
repair next year--a very weak response to a big and important issue, 
particularly when you consider that we just spent $90 billion 
rebuilding the roads and bridges of Afghanistan.
  If you really want to say ``thank you'' to the veterans on behalf of 
a grateful Nation, let's nation-build at home and put our veterans to 
work in rebuilding the America they so honorably defended.

                          ____________________
```
### DRA **FT 8/9/11 rev.** 

**San Joaquin Valley : Motor Vehicle Emission Budget Line Item A** **djustments -**  **2007 SIP**  **vs 2011 SIP Revision**  The following table compares and explains the improvements made to the line item adjustments for the motor vehicle emissions budgets as part of the 2011 update of the 2007 San Joaquin Valley 8 - Hour Ozone SIP. ARB’s new heavy duty truck model aggregates se veral adjustments that were previously separate line items. These include the cleaner in - use diesel truck , public fleet, reflash and idling rules . The improvements to the motor vehicle emissions budgets are consistent with those included in the updated R easonable Further Progress demonstration. **2007 SIP**  **2011 SIP Revision**  **EMFA C 2007**  **EMFA C 2007**  **Existing Measures**  Local Reductions

 State Reductions SJV Rule 9310 - school bus Indirect Source Rule AB 1493 Mo yer - on - road HDDT Chip Ref lash HDDT Public Fleet & Solid W aste Rules HDDT Idling Rule SJV Rule 9310 - school bus (adjusted) 1 Indirect Source Rule 2 AB 1493 Mo yer - on - road

**New /Proposed**  **M easures**   Local Reductions  State Reductions Trip Reduction Rule In - Use HDDT Rule

Smog Check Improvements Reformulated Gasoline Expanded Vehicle Retirement Trip Reduction Rule (adjusted) 3 Heavy Duty Diesel Truck Model 4  In - Use HDDT R ule  HDDT Chip R eflash  HDDT Public F

leet & Solid Waste Rule s  HDDT I dling Rule Smog Check Improvements (adjusted) 5 Reformulated Gasoline Expanded Vehicle Retirement 6 1 Scaled to reflect updated emissions inventory projections for school buses 2 SIP credit for indirect source rule (ISR) was removed per U.S. EPA rulemaking 3 Trip reduction rule benefits have been adjusted to reflect actual reductions. 4 ARB’s new truck emission model incorporates the individual truck - related measures that were previously estimated as per measure offmo del adjustments. 5 The 2007 SIP include d all proposed smog check improvements

. T he 2011 revision only included the following: low pressure evap test, more stringent cutpoints, inspection of light and medium duty diesels and visible smoke test.

### DRA **FT 8/9/11 rev.**  6 Expanded vehicle retirement program benefits hav e not yet been fully quantified and are not included in the transportation conformity budgets.

X: \2007 - 2008 SIPs\2011 Ozone Update\ Submittal Docs \ SJV SIP Update Chart 080911.docx