alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58596-58597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23191]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8479]

Notice of Proposal to Extend the Memorandum of Understanding 
Between the Government of the United States of America and the 
Government of the Republic of Honduras Concerning the Imposition of 
Import Restrictions on Archaeological Material from the Pre-Columbian 
Cultures of Honduras

    The Government of the Republic of Honduras has informed the 
Government of the United States of America of its interest in an 
extension of the Memorandum of Understanding Between the Government of 
the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of 
Honduras Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions on 
Archaeological Material from the Pre-Columbian Cultures of Honduras 
(``MOU'').
    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Deputy Secretary of State, 
and pursuant to the requirement under 19 U.S.C.

[[Page 58597]]

2602(f)(1), an extension of this MOU is hereby proposed.
    Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(2), the views and recommendations of 
the Cultural Property Advisory Committee regarding this proposal will 
be requested.
    A copy of the MOU, the Designated List of restricted categories of 
material, and related information can be found at the following Web 
site: http://eca.state.gov/cultural-heritage-center.

    Dated: September 16, 2013.
William J. Burns,
Deputy Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-23191 Filed 9-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
# Marshall - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Region 10–Bel-O-Mar Regional Council and Interstate Planning Commission Executive Director Scott Hicks Email &#x62;&#x65;&#108;&#111;ma&#x72;&#x40;&#x62;&#101;lo&#x6d;&#x61;&#x72;&#46;&#111;r&#x67;The post Region 10–Bel-O-Mar Regional Council and Interstate Planning Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 390 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4546 

[Report No. 115–525] 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to specify when a nationally traded 

security is exempt from State regulation of security offerings. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 5, 2017 

Mr. ROYCE of California (for himself and Mr. HULTGREN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

JANUARY 25, 2018 

Additional sponsors: Mr. GOTTHEIMER and Mr. MESSER

JANUARY 25, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


ebenthall on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4546 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to specify when a 

nationally traded security is exempt from State regulation of security offerings. 


ebenthall on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4546 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Securities 

5 Exchange Regulatory Parity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NATIONALLY TRADED SECURITIES EXEMPTION. 

7 Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 

8 U.S.C. 77r(b)(1)) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking subparagraph (A); 

10 (2) in subparagraph (B)— 

11 (A) by inserting ‘‘a security designated as 

12 qualified for trading in the national market sys13 tem pursuant to section 11A(a)(2) of the Secu14 rities Exchange Act of 1934 that is’’ before 

15 ‘‘listed’’; and 

16 (B) by striking ‘‘that has listing standards 

17 that the Commission determines by rule (on its 

18 own initiative or on the basis of a petition) are 

19 substantially similar to the listing standards ap20 plicable to securities described in subparagraph 

21 (A)’’; 

22 (3) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘or (B)’’; 

23 and 

24 (4) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and 

25 (C) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively. 


ebenthall on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 390 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4546 

[Report No. 115–525] 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to specify 

State regulation of security offerings. when a nationally traded security is exempt from 

JANUARY 25, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


ebenthall on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
# C_2010221EN.01003801.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2010 — Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche v Commission

(Case T-64/08) (1)

1

(State aid - Compensation for expropriation on grounds of public interest - Temporal extension of a preferential tariff for the supply of electricity - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Concept of advantage - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations - Aid measure put into effect)

2010/C 221/60

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: T. Salonico, G. Pellegrino, G. Pellegrino and G. Barone, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito and G. Conte, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2008/408/EC of 20 November 2007 on the State aid C 36/A/06 (ex NN 38/06) implemented by Italy in favour of ThyssenKrupp, Cementir and Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche (OJ 2008 L 144, p. 37)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application.

| 2. | Order Terni Industrie Chimiche SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order Terni Industrie Chimiche SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

1

---
# Calhoun - Appalachian Regional Commission

- SWEEP: Training West Virginia’s Entrepreneurs “About 80% of West Virginia businesses have 20 or less employees,” said Alyssa Keedy, the Advanced Career Education Coordinator at the West Virginia Department of Education (WVDE). Why is that the case? One reason is a disconnect between West Virginia workers and the skills needed by local employers. With many young West Virginians either leaving [&#8230;]The post SWEEP: Training West Virginia&#8217;s Entrepreneurs appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Region 5–Mid-Ohio Valley Regional Council Executive Director Caroline Stewart Email &#99;&#x61;&#x72;o&#108;&#x69;n&#101;&#x2e;s&#116;&#x65;w&#97;&#x72;&#x74;&#64;&#x6d;&#x6f;v&#114;&#x63;&#46;&#111;&#x72;gThe post Region 5–Mid-Ohio Valley Regional Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1455]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 IN RECOGNITION OF GOSNOLD ON THE CAPE

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. WILLIAM R. KEATING

                            of massachusetts

                    in the house of representatives

                       Monday, September 10, 2012

  Mr. KEATING. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize Gosnold on Cape 
Cod as the facility celebrates its fortieth year of service to 
southeastern Massachusetts.
  Gosnold on Cape Cod is the largest provider of addiction and mental 
health services on the Cape and has been helping individuals on the 
road to recovery since 1972. It has grown since its founding, when it 
was originally known as the Pocasset Detox Center, and has continuously 
expanded throughout the years in order to better serve its patients. 
Two years after it first opened its doors, Gosnold incorporated one of 
the first residential treatment programs in the country designed 
exclusively for women, and expanded again in 1996 to treat individuals 
with mental and emotional disorders in addition to individuals 
suffering from addiction.
  Gosnold has been recognized nationally for its excellence as it has 
grown. In 1987, Forbes Magazine recognized Gosnold as one of the twelve 
leading substance abuse treatment programs in the country, and in 1995, 
the Emerson House Pregnancy Program, Gosnold's residential treatment 
center for pregnant women and women with children, was selected to be 
featured on ABC's Nightline. Recently, the Massachusetts Mental Health 
Counselors Association named Gosnold as the 2010-2011 Mental Health 
Agency of the Year. These are all such fitting accolades for a center 
whose employees have worked tirelessly to ensure that patients receive 
the treatment they need, along with the compassion they deserve.
  Focusing on individualized treatment as well as group therapy, 
twelve-step principles, family involvement, and continuing care, the 
specialists at the Gosnold center understand that addiction is a 
chronic disease requiring lifelong management. Gosnold's mission--to 
excel in addiction and mental health treatment, to serve men, women, 
and families affected by these illnesses, and to promote lasting 
recovery--has guided the center since its inception. Surrounded by the 
restorative and calming qualities of the Cape Cod shoreline, Gosnold 
has allowed those affected by addiction and mental illness to find 
peace and stability after turmoil.
  Mr. Speaker, it brings me great pride to honor Gosnold on Cape Cod as 
it celebrates its fortieth year of service to its patients and to 
Massachusetts. I urge my colleagues to join me in congratulating the 
center for its steadfast leadership in the treatment of addiction, and 
for its dedication to the patients it serves.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2009044EN.01005501.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/55

---

Action brought on 1 December 2008 — Granuband v OHIM — Granuflex (GRANUflex)

(Case T-534/08)

(2009/C 44/96)

Language in which the application was lodged: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Granuband BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Ellens, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Granuflex Ipari és Kereskedelmi Kft (Budapest, Hungary)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul, or at least review, the decision of OHIM of 15 September 2008, served on 24 September 2008, on grounds of infringement of the provisions of Article 52(1), in conjunction with Article 8(4), of Regulation No 40/94, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul, or at least review, the decision of OHIM of 15 September 2008, served on 24 September 2008, on grounds of infringement of the provisions of Article 52(1), in conjunction with Article 8(4), of Regulation No 40/94, and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: the figurative mark GRANUFLEX for goods in Classes 17, 19 and 27 — Community Trade Mark No 943118

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Granuband BV

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Granuflex Ipari és Kereskedelmi Kft.

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Trade-mark right of applicant for the declaration of invalidity: commercial designation GRANUFLEX for goods and services in Classes 17, 19, 27 and 37

Trade-mark right of applicant for the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: declaration that the Community trade mark is invalid

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal brought by the applicant

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: breach of Articles 52(1)(c) and 8(4) of Regulation No 40/94.

Pleas in law:

---
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

            Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries
                        Computation of Earnings Per Share
          (Dollars and Share Data in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     As of and For the Years Ended December 31,
                                                     -------------------------------------------
                                                         2002            2001            2000
                                                     -----------      ----------      ----------
<S>                                                  <C>              <C>             <C>
Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding                21,611          16,529          12,178

Weighted-Average Share Equivalents Outstanding               682             656           2,412
                                                     -----------      ----------      ----------

Weighted-Average Shares and Share Equivalents
Outstanding                                               22,293          17,185          14,590
                                                     ===========      ==========      ==========

Net Income                                           $    36,005      $   30,559      $   30,770
                                                     ===========      ==========      ==========

Basic Earnings Per Share                             $      1.67      $     1.85      $     2.53
                                                     ===========      ==========      ==========

Diluted Earnings Per Share                           $      1.62      $     1.78      $     2.11
                                                     ===========      ==========      ==========
</TABLE>


                                     104
Map Created: March 2013

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2010

Relative Per Capita Income Rates in Appalachia, 2010

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

Per capita income is a measure of the total personal income of 

an area divided by the resident population of the area. The 

percent of the U.S. average is computed by dividing the county 

per capita income by the national average and multiplying by 

100. The map uses critical breaks such as the national average 

to organize the data into groups of common values.

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

47.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.9%

100.0% - 115.9%

Percent of the U.S. Average 

U.S. average = $39,937

Appalachian average = $32,645

(Critical Breaks Classification)
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION





I, Paul E. Blevins,
Chief Financial Officer, certify that:





|1. |  | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Onsite Energy Corporation;
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|3. |  | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Date:  October 14, 2002



By:

/s/    PAUL E. BLEVINSPaul E. Blevins Chief Financial Officer Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Louis C. Cicciari, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Mackston, J.), imposed March 15, 1989, upon his conviction of sodomy in the first degree, upon a plea of guilty.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

The record on appeal reveals that the following colloquy occurred before the court accepted the defendant’s plea:

> "the court: Do you voluntarily then, without hesitation or reservation, give up the right to appeal this conviction, sentence and judgment?

> "the defendant: Yes.

> "the court: No reservations about it, is that correct?

> "the defendant: Yes.

> "the court: Yes, you have no reservations?

> "the defendant: I don’t plan to appeal it.

> "the court: Yes, you have no reservations?

> "the defendant: I don’t understand the question.

> "the court: Do you have any reservations about it? Is it completely voluntarily being done?

> "the defendant: Yes.”

The foregoing establishes that the defendant knowingly waived his right to appeal as a condition to the court’s acceptance of his plea. The appeal must, therefore, be dismissed *(see, People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Sullivan, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Patricio Contesse, Chief Executive Officer
of Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (“SQM”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Republic
of Chile, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Annual Report of SQM on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of SQM.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Patricio Contesse G.        | 
|------------------------------- | 
|Name:  Patricio Contesse G.     | 
|Title:  Chief Executive Officer | 
|Date: April 28, 2014            |
United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

May 13, 2013

ERRATA

______________________ 

Appeal No. 2011-1301

CLS BANK INTERNATIONAL,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

AND

CLS SERVICES. LTD.,

Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,

v.

ALICE CORPORATION PTY. LTD.,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________ 

Decided: May 10, 2013 

Precedential Opinion

______________________ 

Please make the following change in Judge Newman’s concurring 

in part, dissenting in part opinion: 

On page 9, lines 14–15, please change “the Trademark, & 

Copyright Journal” to --the Patent, Trademark, & Copyright 

Journal--.
# C_2008285EN.01004502.xml

| 8.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/45

---

Action brought on 25 August 2008 — Matratzen Concord v OHIM — Barranco Schnitzler and Barranco Rodriguez (MATRATZEN CONCORD)

(Case T-351/08)

(2008/C 285/84)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Matratzen Concord GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: J. Albrecht, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Pablo Barranco Schnitzler (Sant Just Desvern, Spain) and Mariano Barranco Rodriguez (Sant Just Desvern)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 May 2008 (Case R 1034/2007-2); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 May 2008 (Case R 1034/2007-2);

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs, including those of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs, including those of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: figurative mark ‘MATRATZEN CONCORD’ for goods in Classes 10, 20 and 24 (Application No 3 355 369)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietors of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Pablo Barranco Schnitzler and Mariano Barranco Rodriguez

Proprietors of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: national word mark ‘MATRATZEN’ for goods in Class 20

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Refusal of the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94, in that there is no likelihood of confusion between the conflicting marks, and infringement of Article 43(2) of that regulation, in that no proof has been provided of genuine use of the mark cited in opposition.

Pleas in law

---
<PAGE>




                                                                      Exhibit 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated October 24, 1996, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements incorporated by reference in the Annual Report of First
Independence Corporation and Subsidiary on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
September 30, 1996. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
report in the Registration Statement of First Independence Corporation on Form
S-8 (File No. 33-58095, effective March 13, 1995 and File No. 33-75404,
effective February 16, 1994).

GRANT THORNTON LLP

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
--------------------------


Wichita, Kansas
December 24, 1996