alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 25, 2011 

d0418 

Order 

 

April 25, 2011 

141794(18) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141794 

 COA: 298681 

Genesee CC: 08-024059-FC 

DAVID LEE DAVIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 7, 

2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

 ZAHRA, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
# C_2008223EN.01005502.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/55

---

Action brought on 7 July 2008 — Becker Flugfunkwerk v OHIM — Harman Becker Automotive Systems (BECKER AVIONIC SYSTEMS)

(Case T-263/08)

(2008/C 223/98)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Becker Flugfunkwerk GmbH (Rheinmünster, Germany) (represented by: O. Griebenow, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Harman Becker Automotive Systems GmbH (Karlsbad, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 April 2008 in case R 398/2007-1; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 April 2008 in case R 398/2007-1; and

| — | Refuse opposition No B 484 503 relating to Community trade mark application No 1 829 563. |
| --- | --- |

—

Refuse opposition No B 484 503 relating to Community trade mark application No 1 829 563.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘BECKER AVIONIC SYSTEMS’ for goods in class 9, application No 1 829 563

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: United Kingdom trade mark registration No 1 258 929 of the word mark ‘BECKER’ for goods in class 9; German trade mark registration No 1 039 843 of the figurative mark ‘BECKER’ for goods in class 9; German trade mark registration No 1 016 927 of the figurative mark ‘BECKER’ for goods in class 37; Finnish trade mark registration No 116 880 of the word mark ‘BECKER’ for goods in class 9; Greek trade mark registration No 82339 of the word mark ‘BECKER’ for goods in class 9; International trade mark registration No 473 178 of the word mark ‘BECKER’ for goods in class 9

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Uphold the opposition with respect to all the contested goods

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as there is no likelihood of confusion between the conflicting trade marks.

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Green
Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 26, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frances G. Rathke, as the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

Date: November 25, 2009



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/    FRANCES G.
RATHKE
|Frances G. Rathke*      
|Chief Financial Officer 



|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and will be retained by Green
Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
# C_2009069EN.01003803.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/38

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 14 November 2008 — Säveltäjäin Tekijänoikeustoimisto Teosto v Commission

(Case T-401/08 R)

(Interim measures - Commission decision ordering the termination of a concerted practice concerning the collective protection of authors' rights - Application for suspension of a measure - Lack of urgency)

(2009/C 69/89)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Applicant: Säveltäjäin Tekijänoikeustoimisto Teosto ry (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: H. Pokela, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Paasivirta, F. Castillo de la Torre and P. Aalto, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of Article 3 in conjunction with Article 4(2) and (3) of Decision C(2008) 3435 final of the Commission of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698-CISAC), to the extent that the applicant is affected.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
<PAGE>


                                                                EXHIBIT 10(q)(3)

           INCENTIVE COMPENSATION BONUS FORMULA APPROVED FEBRUARY 2004


The annual bonus and restricted stock formulas, under the Incentive Compensation
Plan, for the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), President, Chief Operating Officer
(COO) and Chief Analytics Officer (CAO) are as follows:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          CEO    PRESIDENT    COO     CAO
                                                          ---    ---------    ---     ---
<S>                                                     <C>      <C>         <C>      <C>
Cash component of annual bonus:
  Percentage of improvement in economic profit           5.0%      4.0%      2.5%     2.0%
Restricted stock component of annual bonus:
  Multiple of cash component                             3.5       3.5       1.5      1.5
  Less: economic cost of outstanding stock options       (A)       (A)       (A)      (A)
</TABLE>

(A) - Based on the unexercised stock options outstanding of the individual on
the date of the restricted stock grant.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-29018]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 5, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 27, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 40 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-148, CP2024-154.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-29018 Filed 1-4-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 32.(b).****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas P. Reed, Vice President of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                         /s/ Thomas P. Reed         Thomas P. Reed         (chief financial officer)      August 11, 2006
# C_2008313EN.01002002.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/20

---

Action brought on 21 October 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-457/08)

(2008/C 313/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Yerrell, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/14/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 amending Council Directives 72/166/EEC, 84/5/EEC and 90/232/EEC and Directive 2000/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, or in any event by failing to notify those provisions to the Commission, the United Kingdom has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 6 of the Directive. |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/14/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 amending Council Directives 72/166/EEC, 84/5/EEC and 90/232/EEC and Directive 2000/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, or in any event by failing to notify those provisions to the Commission, the United Kingdom has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 6 of the Directive.

1

| — | order United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive had to be transposed expired on 11 June 2007.

---

(1)  OJ L 149, p. 14.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1529-E1530]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    IN HONOR OF MAYOR FRANK JACKSON

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 14, 2012

  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in honor of Mayor Frank G. 
Jackson, the 56th Mayor of Cleveland, for being named the 2012 Black 
Professional of the Year by the Black Professionals Association 
Charitable Foundation (BPACF).
   Born and raised in Cleveland's Central neighborhood, Mayor Jackson 
attended Cleveland Public Schools. Upon graduating from Max S. Hayes 
High School, he served in the United States Army during the Vietnam 
War. Mayor Jackson later earned an associate's degree from Cuyahoga 
Community College and a bachelor's degree in History and Urban Studies 
from Cleveland State University (CSU). He also would earn a master's 
and law degree from CSU.
   Prior to taking on his role as Mayor of Cleveland, Jackson held a 
number of roles in public service. He began his career in the Cleveland 
Municipal Court Clerk's Office as an Assistant City Prosecutor. Mayor 
Jackson was first elected to public office in 1989 as a Cleveland City 
Councilman. He served the residents of Cleveland's 5th Ward in his 
capacity as a councilman until 2005. He also served as the Cleveland 
City Council President from 2002 to 2005 before being elected as the 
Mayor of Cleveland. He took office in January 2006, dedicating the past 
several years of his life to the residents of the City of Cleveland.
   As Mayor of Cleveland, Jackson has made strong contributions to the 
advancement of equality and has worked tirelessly to increase 
opportunities for the economically and socially disadvantaged. Mayor 
Jackson has supported subsidized affordable housing in Cleveland to 
ensure everyone has a roof over their heads. Moreover he has labored to 
include low income Clevelanders in the decision-making process, rather 
than alienating them. Additionally he is focused on improving the 
education experience of students in the Cleveland Metropolitan School 
District; safety conditions for residents by improving the relationship 
between local law enforcement and the community; and tirelessly working 
on the continued economic development of the City of Cleveland.
   Mr. Speaker and colleagues, please join me in congratulating Mayor 
Frank Jackson on being named the 2012 Black Professional of the Year.

[[Page E1530]]

                          ____________________
```
---



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tari Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  August 14, 2009

/s/ Theodore Tsagkaris

--------------------------------

Theodore Tsagkaris

President, C.E.O. and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

(Principal Financial Officer)



---
# Jackson - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Northeast Georgia Regional Commission Executive Director Burke Walker Email &#98;&#x77;&#97;&#x6c;&#107;&#x65;&#114;&#x40;&#110;&#x65;&#103;&#x72;c&#x2e;o&#x72;gThe post Northeast Georgia Regional Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# Coshocton - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Ohio Mid-Eastern Governments Association Executive Director Dr. Vicki King-Maple Email &#x76;&#109;&#x61;&#x70;l&#x65;&#64;o&#x6d;&#101;g&#x61;&#100;&#x69;&#x73;t&#x72;&#105;c&#x74;&#46;o&#x72;&#103;The post Ohio Mid-Eastern Governments Association appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711 

The Honorable Tom McDonald 

State Representative 

District 28 

201 West Capitol A venue 

Jefferson City, Missouri 65101-6806 

Dear Representative McDonald: 

AUG Z 2 2014 

OFFICE OF 

AIR QUALITY PLANNING 

AND STANDARDS 

Thank you for your letter of July 29, 2014, to United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Administrator McCarthy regarding the EPA's review of the national ambient air quality standards 

(NAAQS) for ozone. The Administrator asked that I respond on her behalf. 

The EPA is currently in the midst of reviewing the ozone NAAQS. We expects to complete its review 

and issue a proposed rule reflecting the Administrator's decision about the appropriateness of revising 

the standards by December 1, 2014. As we move for\vard, we will take into account your comments in 

favor of tightening the 8-hour primary ozone standard to a level of 60 parts per billion (ppb ). 

Under the Clean Air Act, decisions regarding the NAAQS must be based solely on an evaluation of the 

health and environmental effects evidence. The EPA is prohibited from considering costs or ease of 

implementation in setting the NAAQS. However, once the Administrator has determined the appropriate 

level for the standards, costs are carefully considered as part of the implementation process. 

Your comments and recommendations will be forwarded to the docket for this rulemaking (Docket ID 

No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699) so that they may be considered, along with the recommendations of 

the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, and other comments received, as the EPA develops its 

proposed decision. 

Again, thank you for your letter. I appreciate the opportunity to be of service, and hope this information 

has been helpful to you. 

Sincerely 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

RacycladiRecyclable • Printed wnh Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 25% Postconsumer)
Exhibit 10.38


Kite Realty Group Trust


Schedule of 2005 Bonus Benchmarks for Executive Officers


     On March 15, 2005, the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”), of the Board of Trustees of Kite Realty Group Trust (the “Company”), met and approved the establishment of benchmarks to determine 2005 bonuses for the Company’s executive officers.  Such bonuses will be paid in early 2006.  The Company’s executive officers participate in the Kite Realty Group Trust Executive Bonus Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated August 20, 2005.


     The Committee determined that 2005 annual bonuses will be based on objective and subjective criteria and both corporate and individual performance.  The principal corporate performance measures will consist of:


(i) funds from operations (“FFO”), a widely accepted supplemental measure of REIT performance established by the National Association of Real Estate Investments Trusts (to be determined prior to impairment losses);


(ii) new development projects; and


(iii) acquisitions of properties.


     The Committee will measure corporate and individual performance to determine whether an executive officer has earned a “threshold,” “target,” “superior,” or “outperformance” bonus.


     The range of bonuses for each of the Company’s executive officers, other than Mr. Alvin E. Kite, Jr., the Company’s Chairman, expressed as a percentage of the individual’s base salary, is expected to be as set forth below:



	 	 	 
	Name and Principal Position
	 	2005 Bonus
	
	 	

	Mr. John A. Kite
	 	 0-200% of 2005 base salary
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 
	Mr. Thomas K. McGowan
	 	 0-175% of 2005 base salary
	Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
	 	 
	Mr. Daniel R. Sink
	 	 0-125% of 2005 base salary
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	 	 





     The Committee determined that in the case of both Thomas K. McGowan, the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and Daniel R. Sink, the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, approximately 80% of their bonuses will be based on achievement of corporate goals, with the remainder of their bonus to be determined based on the achievement of individual goals.  In the case of John A. Kite, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, the Committee determined that his bonus will be based entirely on achievement of corporate goals.


     The Committee will determine the bonus for Alvin E. Kite, Jr., the Company’s Chairman, separately on an annual basis.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBof Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period endedSeptember 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Ivan Wolkind, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: November 20, 2006 |   |   |   | /s/ IVAN WOLKIND         |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|                     |   |   |   | Ivan Wolkind             |
|                     |   |   |   | Chief Accounting Officer |

 

----