alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10(aa)
 POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.
 AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT
 Garth W. Moore
     4.
    
    The annual supplemental retirement benefit
payable under this Agreement, if any, shall be calculated as of
the date of the Executives termination of employment (or
death, if earlier) as follows:
 (a)
    
    5% of the Executives average 3
highest calendar years Earnings,
 multiplied by
 the Executives years (including partial years
calculated to the last full month completed) of
Continuous Service completed before July 1, 2009 up
to a maximum of 10 years;
 PLUS
 (b)
    
    the sum of (i), (ii) and (iii),
where:
 (i)
    
    is equal to 2% of the
Executives average 3 highest calendar years Earnings,




---



##### 



multiplied by
 the Executives years (including partial years
calculated to the last full month completed) of
Continuous Service in excess of 25 years to a maximum
of 10 additional years, to the extent that such
Continuous Service was completed before July 1, 2009;(ii)
    
    is equal to 2% of the Executives
average Earnings for the 3 consecutive calendar years during
which the Executives Earnings were the highest,
 multiplied by
 the Executives years (including partial years calculated to
the last full month completed) of Continuous Service in
excess of 25 years to a maximum of 10 additional years,
provided that (A) such Continuous Service was completed on
and after July 1, 2009 but before January 1, 2011, and (B)
the sum of the years of Continuous Service taken into account
under section (b)(i) and this section (b)(ii) does not exceed
10; and(iii)
    
    is equal to 1.5% of the Executives
average Earnings for the 3 consecutive calendar years during
which the Executives Earnings were the highest,
 multiplied by
 the Executives years (including partial years calculated to
the last full month completed) of Continuous Service in
excess of 25 years to a maximum of 10 additional years,
provided that (A) such Continuous Service was completed on
and after January 1, 2011, and (B) the sum of the years of
Continuous Service taken into account under sections (b)(i)
and (b)(ii) and this section (b)(iii) does not exceed 10;
 MINUS
 (c)
    
    the annual retirement benefit
which can be provided with the sum of (i) the balance
of the Executives account under the Pension Plan
attributable to employee contributions made to such
plan by the Executive as of December 31, 2010, adjusted
on and after January 1, 2011 for its allocable share of
earnings through the date of the Executives
termination of employment or death, as the case
 - 2 -




---



##### 



may be, and (ii) the Executives account balance
under the Pension Plan attributable to employer
contributions made to the Pension Plan by the
Corporation and/or its subsidiaries or affiliates on
behalf of the Executive (and earnings thereon through
the date of the Executives termination of employment
or death, as the case may be).
   POTASH CORPORATION OF


SASKATCHEWAN INC.By:
    /s/ Barbara Jane IrwinGarth W. Moore/s/ Garth W. Moore SIGNED SEALED AND DELIVERED
 Lee M. KnafelcName of Witness/s/ Lee M. KnafelcSignature of Witness
 - 3 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          43,104
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,234
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,859
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,695
<PP&E>                                          17,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,459
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           693
<OTHER-SE>                                     158,467
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   201,753
<SALES>                                         55,114
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,727
<CGS>                                            3,416
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,568)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,968)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,968)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE> 


Exhibit 4.2         

          Amendment to Specimen Common Stock Certificate


The Specimen Common Stock Certificate has been amended by adding a sentence at
the end of the first paragraph on the reverse side thereof, as indicated below:


    [first paragraph on reverse side of amended Specimen Stock Certificate:]



     This certificate also evidences and entitles the holder hereof to
certain Rights as set forth in the Rights Agreement, dated as of July 6,
1995 (the "Rights Agreement), between Belden Inc. and First Chicago Trust
Company of New York as Rights Agent, the terms of which are hereby
incorporated herein by reference and a copy of which is on file at the
principal offices of Belden Inc.  Under certain circumstances, as set forth
in the Rights Agreement, such Rights will be evidenced by separate
certificates and will no longer be evidenced by this certificate.  Belden
Inc. will mail to the holder of this certificate a copy of the Rights
Agreement, as in effect on the date of mailing, without charge promptly
after receipt of a written request therefor.  Under certain circumstances
set forth in the Rights Agreement, Rights issued to, or held by, any Person
who is, was or becomes an Acquiring Person or any Affiliate or Associate
thereof (as such terms are defined in the Rights Agreement), whether
currently held by or on behalf of such Person or by any subsequent holder,
may become null and void.  *[Boatmen's Trust Company has superseded First
Chicago Trust Company of New York as Rights Agent.]

*  [] Denotes added sentence<PAGE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4742 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the principal 

campaign committee of a candidate in a general election for the office 

of President to file a certification that the candidate has undergone 

a medical examination conducted by a medical office under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2018 

Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

require the principal campaign committee of a candidate 

in a general election for the office of President to file 

a certification that the candidate has undergone a medical examination conducted by a medical office under 

the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Standardizing Testing 

5 and Accountability Before Large Elections Giving Electors 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4742 IH

1 Necessary Information for Unobstructed Selection Act’’ or 

2 the ‘‘STABLE GENIUS Act’’. 

3 SEC. 2. MEDICAL EXAMINATION OF PRESIDENTIAL CAN4 DIDATES. 

5 (a) REQUIRING PRINCIPAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE

6 TO CERTIFY THAT CANDIDATE HAS UNDERGONE EXAM7 INATION.—Section 304 of the Federal Election Campaign 

8 Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30104) is amended by adding at 

9 the end the following new subsection: 

10 ‘‘(j) CERTIFICATION OF MEDICAL EXAMINATION OF

11 PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE.— 

12 ‘‘(1) REQUIRING FILING OF CERTIFICATION.— 

13 The principal campaign committee of a candidate for 

14 election for the office of President shall file a report 

15 with the Commission under this section containing— 

16 ‘‘(A) a certification that a medical office 

17 under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the 

18 Navy conducted a medical examination of the 

19 candidate after the candidate won the nomina20 tion of a political party to run as a candidate 

21 in the general election for such office; and 

22 ‘‘(B) the results of such medical examina23 tion. 

24 ‘‘(2) DEADLINE.—A principal campaign com25 mittee of a candidate for election for the office of 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4742 IH

1 President shall file the report required under para2 graph (1) not later than 21 days after the date on 

3 which the candidate won the political party’s nomi4 nation to run as a candidate in the general elec5 tion.’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to the general elec8 tion for the office of President held in November 2020 

9 and each succeeding general election for such office. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4522 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4522

 To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to prohibit the 
use of public funds for the payment of a settlement or award under such 
Act in connection with a claim arising from sexual harassment committed 
                        by a Member of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2017

  Mrs. Love introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to prohibit the 
use of public funds for the payment of a settlement or award under such 
Act in connection with a claim arising from sexual harassment committed 
                        by a Member of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Taxpayers Obligations to 
Perpetrators of Sexual Harassment Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING USE OF PUBLIC FUNDS FOR PAYMENT OF SETTLEMENTS AND 
              AWARDS UNDER CONGRESSIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT IN SEXUAL 
              HARASSMENT CLAIMS INVOLVING MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

    (a) Prohibition.--Section 415 of the Congressional Accountability 
Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1415) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``subsection (c)'' and 
        inserting ``subsections (c) and (d)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) No Use of Public Funds for Payments of Awards and Settlements 
in Connection With Acts of Sexual Harassment Committed by Members of 
Congress.--No funds of the Treasury of the United States may be used 
for the payment of an award or settlement under this Act in connection 
with a violation of section 201(a)(1) if the violation consists of an 
act of sexual harassment committed personally by a Member of the House 
of Representatives (including a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to 
the Congress) or a Senator.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to settlements and awards paid on or after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Sperry Rand Corporation, Plaintiff, *v.*Pyramid Crane Co. et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

November 4, 1959.

*Ghadbourne, Parke, Whiteside & Wolff (Claude B. Breese*and *Alan B. Lerner*of counsel), for plaintiff.

*Frank $ Frank*for Pyramid Cranes Co., defendant appearing specially.

*Wilson é Bave*for Sorgel Electric Company, defendant.

*917*Clarence W. Williamson, Jr.,*for Peters & Peters, Inc., defendant.

Francis X. Conlon, J.

Plaintiff moves for an order directing that the summons in the above-entitled action be amended, changing the name of the defendant from Pyramid Crane Co. to Pyramid Cranes Co., Inc.

Action was commenced by the service of a summons only. The motion is occasioned by defendant’s refusal to make a general appearance. The defendant contends that the relief under section 105 of the Civil Practice Act would, in the circumstances here, result in a substitution of a new party not a party to the action, and not in the correction of a misnomer. However, the question is whether the defendant was fairly apprised by the summons that it was the party intended. The summons was admittedly served upon an officer of the corporation after difficulty in effecting such service upon an officer and after delivery of the summons to the Sheriff to effect such service. The Statute of Limitations has now run and the claim in suit is barred.

Defendant is actually being sued as a corporation, and heretofore was sued by another in an action in which the defendant was named as in the summons which plaintiff now seeks to amend. In that action, the defendant answered and was defended by its insurance carrier. Indeed, the corporation knew it was served with the summons in this action and that it involved the insurance coverage likewise involved in the other action, and it did deliver the summons to its insurance carrier. The latter refused to defend, and accordingly, the defendant, the statute having run, insists upon asserting a special appearance and resisting the motion. It urges that it was its duty to deliver the summons to the insurance carrier but it was not its duty to permit an appearance in this action by counsel for its insurance carrier any more than it was its duty to appear in the other action, unless it was in fact fairly apprised that it was the defendant intended. This the court finds to be the fact, and the motion is granted, with leave to the defendant to appear.

Settle order.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 244 (Thursday, December 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 88404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Mechanisms Underlying Heterogeneity of Cognitive Outcomes in 
Synucleinopathy.
    Date: January 22, 2024.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Joshua Jin-Hyouk Park, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 496-6208, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9d3d6cad1ccd897c9d8cbd28df9d7d0d197ded6cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b0dadfc3d8c5d19ec0d1c2db84f0ded9d89ed7dfc6">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 15, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-28026 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                     5

<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                      0000909724
<NAME>                     THE LEATHER FACTORY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                      1
<CURRENCY>                                               US DOLLARS

<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                            DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                   1
<CASH>                                                      234,141
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             2,529,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                                338,000
<INVENTORY>                                               9,205,898
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         12,663,777
<PP&E>                                                    3,657,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                            2,494,732
                           <TOTAL-ASSETS> 19,686,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     9,304,943
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                     23,780
<OTHER-SE>                                               10,271,857
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             19,686,079
<SALES>                                                  30,095,264
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         30,095,264
<CGS>                                                    15,147,547
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            15,147,547
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         11,702,633
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          617,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           2,591,305
<INCOME-TAX>                                              1,049,985
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       1,541,320
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                              1,541,320
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0.15




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Paul G. Laird, Chief Executive Officer and I, Les Bates, Chief Financial
Officer of New Frontier Energy, Inc. (the "Company") certify that:

     1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of New Frontier
Energy, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report; and

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report.

Date:    January 16, 2006



/s/ Paul G. Laird
-----------------
Paul G. Laird,
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Les Bates
-------------
Les Bates,
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6061]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California:
        H.R. 6412.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 of the Constitution.
```
#### Paul MENNELLI, Petitioner, v. Robert R. RAINES, Acting Warden Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Respondent.

No. A-12735.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

July 1, 1959.

Paul Mennelli, pro se.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Lewis A. Wallace, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

*922PER CURIAM.

This is an original petition for writ of habeas corpus brought by Paul Mennelli, petitioner. Therein he alleges he is being unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the acting warden of the penitentiary, said acting warden now being Robert Raines.

Among the complaints raised in the petition, none of them are sufficient to seriously challenge the court’s jurisdiction of the person of the petitioner — the jurisdiction of the court over the subject matter — or the jurisdiction of the court to pronounce judgment and sentence. The complaints all relate to matters that should have been considered by direct appeal.

The complaints refer to irregularities or error of law arising during the court of trial such as that the petitioner was held incommunicado under a doctor’s care without being permitted to call counsel for five days; that he was denied a speedy trial, but does not state the amount of time elapsing between the charging by information and the time of trial except that the preliminary hearing was continued four times without petitioner’s request; that the county attorney’s conduct was prejudicial; that the state failed to adequately prove the former conviction and that the punishment assessed by the court was cruel and excessive. These are matters that should have been raised on appeal and are not sufficiently stated to permit relief by way of habeas corpus.

The complaints as alleged in the petition for habeas corpus did not affect the court’s jurisdiction, but were purely matters lacking in materiality or errors of law to be raised on appeal.

This court has repeatedly held that habeas corpus may not be used as a substitute for an appeal and where the petition wholly fails to state facts sufficient to warrant the discharge of the petitioner the writ will be denied. Ex parte Linam, 71 Okl.Cr. 155, 109 P.2d 838; Ex parte Whitson, 70 Okl.Cr. 79, 104 P.2d 980, and numerous other cases.

The writ is accordingly denied.