alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H5629-H5630]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. CARNAHAN:
       H.R. 6254.

[[Page H5630]]

       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 1. ``All legislative Powers herein 
     granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, 
     which shall consist of a Senate and a House of 
     Representatives.''
```
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                       OF HANOVER COMPRESSOR HOLDING CO.


It is hereby certified that:

          1.  The name of the corporation is Hanover Compressor Holding Co. (the
"Corporation").

          2.  The amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation effected by this
Certificate is as follows:

          The First Article of the Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation is hereby deleted in its entirety with the following substituted
therefor:

          "FIRST:  The name of the corporation (hereinafter the "Corporation")
          is Hanover Compressor Company."

          The aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.
<PAGE>

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this certificate has been duly executed on behalf
of Hanover Compressor Holding Co. by its duly authorized Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer, Curtis Bedrich, and its duly authorized Secretary, Richard S.
Meller, this 8th day of December, 1999.

                                    HANOVER COMPRESSOR HOLDING CO.,
                                    a Delaware corporation


                                    By:  /s/ CURTIS BEDRICH
                                        --------------------------------------
                                         Curtis Bedrich
                                         Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

                                    By:  /s/ RICHARD S. MELLER
                                        --------------------------------------
                                         Richard S. Meller
                                         Secretary
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6000]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Ms. SLAUGHTER:
       H.R. 6405.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Art. I, Sec. 8, cl. 1
       Art. I, Sec. 8, cl. 18
```
ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Buckhead America Corporation:

We consent to incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statements (Nos.
333-05313 and 333-37691) on Form S-3 and in the  Registration  Statements  (Nos.
33-97046,  333-33097 and 333-58375) on Form S-8 of Buckhead America  Corporation
of our report dated March 5, 1999,  relating to the consolidated  balance sheets
of Buckhead  America  Corporation  and  subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and
1997, and the related  consolidated  statements of income,  shareholders' equity
and comprehensive  income, and cash flows for the years then ended, which report
appears in the  December  31,  1998  annual  report on Form  10-KSB of  Buckhead
America Corporation.

                                                   /s/ KPMG LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 31, 1999
# Surry - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Piedmont Triad Regional Council Executive Director Matthew L. Dolge Email m&#100;&#111;&#x6c;&#x67;&#x65;&#64;&#112;&#116;&#x72;&#x63;&#x2e;or&#103;The post Piedmont Triad Regional Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 225TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on March 11, 2015, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

AAA Free Move Ministorage L.L.C., Appellant

V.

Brigham Living Trust, Appellee

No. 04-14-00163-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2012-CI-01363

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s

Order Granting Defendant’s Traditional and No Evidence Motion for

Summary Judgment is AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that appellee recover costs of appeal from appellant.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on May 20, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-14-00163-CV

AAA Free Move Ministorage L.L.C.

v.

Brigham Living Trust

(NO. 2012-CI-01363 IN 225TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

REPORTER'S RECORD

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51

FEE

INDIGENT

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$138.00

$100.00

$20.00

$50.00

$25.00

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

GREGORY VANCLEAVE

KORTNEY KLOPPE-ORTON

WILLIAM H. OLIVER

GREG VANCLEAVE

GREG VANCLEAVE

GREGORY VAN CLEAVE

PLAINTIFF

GREGORY VAN CLEAVE

GREGORY VAN CLEAVE

GREGORY VAN CLEAVE

GREGORY VAN CLEAVE

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this May 20, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6241]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                SCHEDULE

  Mr. REID. Madam President, the Senate will now consider the motion to 
proceed to S. 3547, the Veterans Jobs Corps Act. Seventy minutes will 
be equally divided this morning between the two leaders or their 
designees, with the Republicans controlling the first half and the 
majority controlling the final half.
  We will begin consideration of the Veterans Jobs Corps bill today. It 
is unfortunate that we are having to go through another couple of 
filibusters on this bill, but that is what we have been through.
  I mentioned yesterday on the floor that for the 6 years we have had a 
Democratic majority, there have been 380--this makes now 381--
filibusters. During the time of Lyndon Johnson, 6 years, the same 
period of time, there was 1 filibuster--381 to 1. That is the kind of 
obstruction that has taken place in this body by the Republicans, and 
it is untoward by any stretch of the imagination. There has never been 
anything close to this.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Forms S-3 (No. 333-49271, No. 333-49271-01 and No. 333-78127) and
Forms S-8 (No. 333-39794, No. 333-29643, No. 333-29647, No. 333-90534, No.
333-91216 and No. 333-91218) of Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp. of our
reports dated February 11, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules, which appear in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, PA
March 12, 2004
# C_2008008EN.01001901.xml

| 12.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/19

---

Action brought on 6 November 2007 — Kaul v OHIM — Bayer (ARCOL)

(Case T-402/07)

(2008/C 8/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Kaul GmbH (Elmshorn, Germany) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bayer AG (Leverkusen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | The decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 1 August 2007 in Case R 782/2000-2, pertaining to the opposition based on Community trade mark registration No 49 106 ‘CAPOL’ against Community trade mark application No 195 370 ‘ARCOL’, be annulled; |
| --- | --- |

—

The decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 1 August 2007 in Case R 782/2000-2, pertaining to the opposition based on Community trade mark registration No 49 106 ‘CAPOL’ against Community trade mark application No 195 370 ‘ARCOL’, be annulled;

| — | the opposition against Community trade mark application No 195 370 ‘ARCOL’, be granted; |
| --- | --- |

—

the opposition against Community trade mark application No 195 370 ‘ARCOL’, be granted;

| — | the defendant pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

the defendant pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: Bayer AG

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The Community word mark ‘ARCOL’ for goods in Classes 1, 17 and 20 — application No 195 370

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Kaul GmbH

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The Community word mark ‘CAPOL’ for goods in classes 1

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 63(6), 73, and 74 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94(‘the CTMR’).

Pleas in law:

According to the applicant, the Board of Appeal failed to take into account the obligations laid down in Articles 63(6) and 73 of the CTMR by disregarding the guidance provided by the Court of Justice in Case C-29/05 P and by refusing to exercise any discretion under Article 74(2) of the CTMR. Furthermore, the applicant contends that the Board failed to state reasons on which it based its decision.

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Omer Regev, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Administrative Officer of NetManage, Inc., certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:



| | (i) | The accompanying Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NetManage, Inc.
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    OMER REGEVVice President Finance, andChief Financial OfficerDate:

April 30, 2007
Map Created: March 2010.

Data Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, LAUS, 2006-2008;

U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2007;

U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census, SF3.

County Economic Status in Appalachia, Fiscal Year 2011

(Effective October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011)

The Appalachian Regional Commission uses an index-based county 

economic classification system to identify and monitor the economic 

status of Appalachian counties. See the reverse side for a description of 

each economic level.

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

Distressed (82)

At-Risk (86)

Transitional (228)

Competitive (18)

County Economic Levels

Attainment (6)
County Economic Status Classification System, FY 2011

The Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) uses an index-based county economic classification system to 

identify and monitor the economic status of Appalachian counties. The system involves the creation of a 

national index of county economic status through a comparison of each county’s averages for three economic 

indicators—three-year average unemployment rate, per capita market income, and poverty rate—with national 

averages. The resulting values are summed and averaged to create a composite index value for each county. 

Each county in the nation is then ranked, based on its composite index value, with higher values indicating 

higher levels of distress.

County Economic Levels

Each Appalachian county is classified into one of five economic status designations, based on its position in the 

national ranking. 

Distressed

Distressed counties are the most economically depressed counties. They rank in the worst 10 percent of the 

nation’s counties.

At-Risk

At-Risk counties are those at risk of becoming economically distressed. They rank between the worst 10 percent 

and 25 percent of the nation’s counties.

Transitional

Transitional counties are those transitioning between strong and weak economies. They make up the largest 

economic status designation. Transitional counties rank between the worst 25 percent and the best 25 percent of 

the nation’s counties.

Competitive

Competitive counties are those that are able to compete in the national economy but are not in the highest 10 

percent of the nation’s counties. Counties ranking between the best 10 percent and 25 percent of the nation’s 

counties are classified competitive.

Attainment

Attainment counties are the economically strongest counties. Counties ranking in the best 10 percent of the 

nation’s counties are classified attainment.

Attainment 

Counties

Best 10% of 

U.S. Counties

Competitive 

Counties

Best 10+ to 25% of 

U.S. Counties

At-Risk 

Counties

Worst 10+ to 25% 

of U.S. Counties

Distressed 

Counties

Worst 10%

 of U.S. 

Counties

ARC County Economic Status Designation by National Index Value Rank

Ranked Index Values 

of U.S. Counties

Transitional Counties

Higher Index Values Lower Index Values
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-5088 ALAN TOORAEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 08-CV-826,

Chief Judge Emily C. Hewitt. ON MOTION Before MAYER, CLEVENGER, and RADER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER The United States moves to dismiss Alan Tooraen's appeal from the March 27, 2009 judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims as untimely. The Court of Federal Claims issued its decision dismissing Tooraen's complaint with prejudice on March 27, 2009 and entered judgment the same day. Tooraen's notice of appeal was received by the court on May 27, 2009, 61 days after the date of entry of judgment. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2522 and Rule 4(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, a notice of appeal from an order or decision of the Court of Federal Claims must be filed "within 60 days after the judgment or appealed from is entered." As the Supreme Court has stated when the time for filing a notice of appeal is limited bystatute, such as in this case, those limits are mandatory and jurisdictional. Bowles v.

Russell, 551 U.S. 205 (2007) (the timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement that cannot be waived). Because Tooraen's appeal was not received within 60 days of the date the Court of Federal Claims entered judgment, we must dismiss his appeal as untimely. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Tooraen's appeal is dismissed. All sides shall bear their own costs. FOR THE COURT

Jan Horbaly Clerk
cc: Alan Tooraen Steven M. Mager, Esq. s19 FILEP U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT JUL 3 0 2009 JANNORBAIY CLERK 

# JUL 3 0 2009 Date /s/ Jan Horbalv

2009-5088 2
**Exhibit
      10.9**





**AMENDMENT
      NO. 1 TO THE**


**KERR-McGEE
      CORPORATION**


**SUPPLEMENTAL
      EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN**


**AMENDED
      AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE AS OF FEBRUARY 26, 1999**








**WHEREAS** ,
      the Kerr-McGee Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the "Plan")
      was amended and restated in its entirety as of February 26, 1999;





**WHEREAS** ,
      by the terms of Section 9.1 of the Plan, the Company is authorized to amend
      the
      Plan; and





**WHEREAS** ,
      the Company desires to amend the Plan to revise the treatment of bonus payments
      in the benefit formula under the Plan;





**NOW,
      THEREFORE** ,
      the Plan is amended as follows, effective September 13, 2005:





1.  The
      final sentence of Section 2.14 is hereby revised to read as
      follows:




"The
      foregoing notwithstanding, (1) Final Average Monthly Pay shall exclude all
      compensation received or deferred after a Participant's Normal Retirement Date,
      and (2) if an individual becomes a Participant in the Plan after September
      13,
      2005, and receives more than three bonuses during the 36-month period used
      to
      calculate Final Average Monthly Pay, only the three largest bonuses shall be
      used in such calculation."





**IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, KERR-MCGEE CORPORATION** has, on its behalf and on behalf of its participating affiliates, caused this
      amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officers this 19 th day of October, 2005.








**ATTEST:**
            **KERR-McGEE
                CORPORATION**/s/
                John F. Reichenberger
            /s/
                Frances G. HeartwellJohn
                F. Reichenberger
            Frances
                G. HeartwellAssistant
                Secretary
            Vice
                President, Human Resources


H:\014390\00007\SERP-AMD
        1 (FAP)-3.DOC
================================================================================

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Spirit,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.



Date:  June 22, 2005

                                                /s/ Peter Sotola
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Peter Sotola
                                                Secretary, Treasurer & C.F.O.
                                               (Principal Financial Officer and
                                                Principal Accounting Officer)
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOHNNIE ELIJAH and EDNA ELIJAH,

Appellants,

v.

ADAMS TRANSPORT, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-945

[August 17, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Keathan B. Frink, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE20007326.

Brian J. Lee of Morgan & Morgan, Jacksonville, for appellants.

Steven Mitchel, Marie Baez Lorenzo, William Xanttopoulos, and Lianet 

Rodriguez Quindemil of Mintzer, Sarowitz, Zeris, Ledva & Meyers, LLP, 

Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      The undersigned, as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Allied
Holdings, Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, which
accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Allied Holdings, Inc. at the dates and
for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall
not be relied upon for any other purpose.

      This 15th day of April, 2005.


                                                /s/ Hugh E. Sawyer
                                      -------------------------------------
                                                  Hugh E. Sawyer
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Allied Holdings, Inc. and will be
retained by Allied Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The information in this Exhibit 32.1 shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be
deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933,
except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.