alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Letter regarding certain debt instruments



 Exhibit 4.3 
  

March 30, 2005 
  
 Securities and Exchange Commission 
 450 Fifth Street, N.W. 
 Washington, D.C. 20549 
  
 Subject: Las Vegas
Sands Corp. 10-K 
  
 In accordance with paragraph (b)(4)(iii) of
Item 601 of Regulation S-K, Las Vegas Sands Corp. (the “Corporation”) has not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) copies of certain instruments with respect to long-term debt of the Corporation and its
subsidiaries, the total amount of debt authorized under each of which does not exceed 10% of the aggregate assets of the Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Corporation hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, a
copy of each instrument which defines the rights of holders of such long-term debt. 
  

			
	 Very truly yours,

	
	 LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

		
	 By:
	 	/s/    BRADLEY K. SERWIN        
	 	 	Bradley K. Serwin
	 	 	General Counsel and Secretary
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4463 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

6 Doyers Street in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Mabel Lee Memorial 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 28, 2017 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ (for herself, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. ENGEL, Mrs. CAROLYN B. 

MALONEY of New York, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Ms. MENG, Mr. KATKO, Mr. 

COLLINS of New York, Mr. DONOVAN, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. 

TONKO, Mr. NADLER, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. 

FASO, Miss RICE of New York, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New 

York, Mr. SUOZZI, Ms. STEFANIK, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. REED, Mr. 

JEFFRIES, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. KING of New 

York, Ms. TENNEY, Ms. NORTON, and Ms. JACKSON LEE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 6 Doyers Street in New York, New York, 

as the ‘‘Mabel Lee Memorial Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MABEL LEE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 6 Doyers Street in New York, 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4463 IH

1 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Mabel 

2 Lee Memorial Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Mabel Lee Memorial 

7 Post Office’’. 

Æ 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28905]



[[Page 348]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XD606]


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is 
scheduling a public meeting of its Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management 
(EBFM) Committee via webinar to consider actions affecting New England 
fisheries in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Recommendations from 
this group will be brought to the full Council for formal consideration 
and action, if appropriate.

DATES: This webinar will be held on Thursday, January 18, 2024, at 9 
a.m.

ADDRESSES: Webinar registration URL information: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/843488582192335193.
    Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water 
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cate O'Keefe, Executive Director, New 
England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Agenda

    The Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management Committee will meet to 
consider strategies for furthering ecosystem approaches to fisheries 
management, including potential incorporation of ecosystem information 
into stock assessment and management advice. Other business will be 
discussed if necessary.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained on the agenda may come 
before this Council for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Council action will be restricted 
to those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues 
arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action 
under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public 
has been notified of the Council's intent to take final action to 
address the emergency. The public also should be aware that the meeting 
will be recorded. Consistent with 16 U.S.C. 1852, a copy of the 
recording is available upon request.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Cate O'Keefe, Executive Director, at (978) 465-
0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: December 28, 2023.
Diane M. DeJames-Daly,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-28905 Filed 1-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

Th e H o n o r a b l e So l o mo n O l i v e r , J r . , Ch i e f D i s tr i c tJ u d g e f

o rth e U . S. ** D i s tr i c tC our tf

orthe N or the rn D i s tr i c tof O hi o, C l e ve l a nd, s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M A N U EL PRI M A S, P e titio n e r - A p p e lla n t, v. P E OP L E OF T HE S T AT E OF C AL I F ORNI A, R es po nd ent -A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 17468 D. C. No . 2 : 0 5 - c v - 0 1 5 5 7 - M CE K JM

ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e D is tr ic t o f

E a s te rn C a lif

o rn ia M orr i s on C . E ngl a nd, J uni or , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r14, 2011 S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: T H O M A S and N . R . S M IT H , C i rc ui tJudg es , and O L IV E R , C hi ef D i stri ct Judg e. ** 

# FI LED DE C 23 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS- 2-

C al i fo rn i a S t at e p ri so n er, M an u el P ri m as, appe a l s the di s tr i c tc our t ’ s de ni a l of hi s 28 U . S . C . § 225 4 habea s corpus pet i t i on chal l engi ng hi s j ury c on vi ct i on of m urder and at t em pt ed robb ery. P ri m as m ain tain s thathi s c on vi ct i on shou l d b e r ever se d because the tri al court adm i tt ed hi s con fe ss i on i nt o evi dence i n v i ol at i on of Mi r anda v . A r i z ona , 38 4 U . S . 43 6 (19 66 ). W e r evi ew de no vo th e di stri ctcourt ’ s deni al of a s t a t e pr i s on er’ s habe a s pe t i t i on. B arke rv . Fl e m i ng , 42 3 F . 3d 10 85 , 10 91 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 5 ) . W e a f

f i r m. T h e C a lif

o rn ia C o u r t o f A p p e a l’s d e c is io n th a t P r im a s d id n o t u n a m b ig u o u s ly i nv ok e hi s r i gh t t o r em ai n s i l entw hi l e bei ng i nt errogat ed, and t hathi s s t at em ent s w er e u n c o e r c e d a n d v o lu n ta ry , B e r ghuis v . T

hom pki ns , 13 0 S . C t . 22 50 , 22 59 -60 (20 10 ), wa s n o t c o n tr a ry t o o r a n u n r e a s o n a b l e ap p l i c a t i o n o f c l e a r l y e s t a b l i s h e d f

e d e r a l l a w, n o ra n u n r e a s o n a b le d e te r m in a tio n o f th e f a c ts , se e 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 4(d). AF F I RME D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           283,718
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      72,768
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 356,486
<CASH>                                          31,573
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                 999
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          16,853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 469,198
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                151,150
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             64,787
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,796     
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   469,198
<PREMIUMS>                                     122,687
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             15,448
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 474
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     219
<BENEFITS>                                      66,374
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     38,422
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             2,212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,050
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,022
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,028
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,028
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 108,928<F1>
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             69,544
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (3,170)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              13,402
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                26,870
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                135,030<F1>
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>UNPAID LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES DIFFER FROM THE AMOUNTS REPORTED IN
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BECAUSE OF THE INCLUSION HEREIN OF
REINSURANCE RECEIVABLES OF $16,120 AND $13,502 AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1997,
RESPECTIVELY
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Map Created: September 2016

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2010–2014

High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2010–2014

(County Rates)

A high school completion rate is the percentage of persons ages 

25 and over with a high school diploma or more. The map uses 

natural breaks in the distribution to organize the data into groups 

of common values. 

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

55.8% - 72.4%

72.5% - 78.6%

78.7% - 84.9%

85.0% - 93.6%

Completion Rate 

U.S. average = 86.3%

Appalachian average = 85.1%

(Natural Breaks Classification)
# C_2010246EN.01000501.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/5

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2010 — Hellenic Republic v European Commission

(Case C-54/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Agriculture - Common organisation of the market in wine - Aid for the restructuring and conversion of vineyards - Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 - Fixing of the definitive financial allocations made to Member States - Regulation (EC) No 1227/2000 - Article 16(1) - Time-limit - Binding nature)

2010/C 246/07

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: I. Chalkias and M. Tassopoulou, Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: H. Tserepa-Lacombe and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 11 December 2008 in Case T-339/06 Greece v Commission, by which the Court dismissed an action for annulment of Commission Decision 2006/669/EC of 4 October 2006 fixing, for the 2006 financial year and in respect of a certain number of hectares, the definitive financial allocations to Member States for the restructuring and conversion of vineyards under Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 (notified under document number C(2006) 4348) (OJ 2006 L 275, p. 62) in so far as the decision fixes the hectares and the definitive financial allocations concerning Greece

Greece

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 4.4.2009.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 3 (Thursday, January 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-29004]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


International Product Change--Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package 
International Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package 
International Service contract to the list of Negotiated Service 
Agreements in the Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification 
Schedule.

DATES: Date of notice: January 4, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-
7820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 27, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail 
International & First-Class Package International Service Contract 34 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2024-146 and CP2024-152.

Christopher Doyle,
Attorney, Ethics and Legal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023-29004 Filed 1-3-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### MERCANTILE COMMERCE BANK & TRUST CO., Trustee, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 11332.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Aug. 1, 1939.

Forest P. Tralles and Fred J. Hoffmeister, both of St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

Harry C. Blanton, U. S. Atty., of Sikeston, Mo., Herbert H. Freer, Asst. U. S. Atty., of St. Louis, Mo., James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Andrew D. Sharpe and Leon F. Cooper, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal, Brown v. United States, 21 F.Supp. 214, dismissed at’ cost of appellant, per stipulation of párty.
Exhibit 12



Bedford Property Investors, Inc.

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Limited Partner Distributions

(in thousands, except ratios)



|                                                                                                    | Year Ended December 31,
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------
|                                                                                                    |                        
|                                                                                                    | 2003                   
|                                                                                                    |                        
|Net income                                                                                          | $27,665                
|                                                                                                    |                        
|Fixed charges  interest and amortization
of loan fees:                                             |                        
|Continuing operations                                                                               | 21,956                 
|Discontinued operations                                                                             | -                      
|                                                                                                    |                        
|Fixed charges  interest capitalized                                                                | 131                    
|                                                                                                    |                        
|Total fixed charges                                                                                 | 22,087                 
|                                                                                                    |                        
|Preferred dividends and limited partner
distributions                                               | 685                    
|                                                                                                    |                        
|Total fixed charges, including preferred
dividends and limited partner distributions                | 22,772                 
|                                                                                                    |                        
|Net income including fixed charges,
preferred dividends and limited partner
distributions           | $50,437                
|                                                                                                    |                        
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
including preferred dividends and limited
partner distributions | 2.21                   
|                                                                                                    |                        
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
excluding preferred dividends and limited
partner distributions | 2.28
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009(the Report) of MCG Capital
Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stephen J. Bacica, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ STEPHEN J. BACICAName:

Stephen J. BacicaTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

May 8, 2009
#### STALEY v. STATE.

No. A-11753.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

July 8, 1953.

*546Orval Grim, Sayre, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., and Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

BRETT, Judge.

The plaintiff in error, defendant below, Oscar Staley, was charged by information in the county court of Beckham county, Oklahoma, with the unlawful possession on or about April 26, 1951 in said county and state of certain intoxicating liquor, to wit, 8 fifths of Old Crow, 8 fifths of Waterfill Frazier, 4 fifths of James E. Pepper, 11 fifths of I. W. Harper, 1 fifth of Cascade, 12 fifths of Schenleys, 10 fifths of Yellowstone, 11 fifths of Old Hickory, 6 fifths of Old Charter, 1 fifth of Calvert, 12 one-half pints of Schenleys, 16 one-half pints of Stillbrook, 20 half pints of Three Feathers, 38 half pints of Old Quaker, 14 half pints of Old Crow, 3 half pints of Early Times, 27 half pints of Old Stagg, 12 half pints of Old Hickory, 48 half pints of Imperial, with the unlawful intent of selling, bartering, giving away or otherwise furnishing the same to others. A jury was waived and the case tried to the court, the defendant found guilty, his punishment fixed at a fine of $250 and 60 days in the county jail, judgment and sentence entered accordingly from which this appeal has been perfected.

The record herein discloses that no motion for new trial was presented to the trial court covering the errors herein alleged. In Herren v. State, 74 Okl.Cr. 424, 127 P.2d 215, 217, it was said:

> “Only * * * questions which were raised in the trial court and an adverse ruling thereon, exceptions taken, and then incorporated in a motion for new trial, and assigned as error i'n the petition in error, will be considered on appeal, except that jurisdictional questions may be raised at any step of the case.”

See also Coffey v. State, Okl.Cr.App., 235 P.2d 546. For the foregoing reasons this court is without jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

Irrespective of the foregoing we have examined the case and find the contentions are without merit. Substantially the same contentions were raised in Staley v. State, Okl.Cr.App., 256 P.2d 822. For the foregoing reasons the judgment and sentence is accordingly affirmed.

POWELL, P. J., and JONES, J., concur.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
        connection with the amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Verdisys,
        Inc.,
        now known as Blast Energy Services, Inc., (the “Company”) for the period ended
        March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
        date
        hereof (the “Report”), I, John O’Keefe, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Chief
        Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      March 29, 2006





By:
            /s/
                John O’KeefeJohn
                O’KeefeCo-Chief
                Executive OfficerChief
                Financial OfficerPrincipal
                Accounting Officer