alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4697 

To amend the Wyoming Wilderness Act of 1984 to clarify authorized recreational uses in the Palisades, High Lakes, and Shoal Creek Wilderness 

Study Areas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 20, 2017 

Ms. CHENEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Wyoming Wilderness Act of 1984 to clarify 

authorized recreational uses in the Palisades, High 

Lakes, and Shoal Creek Wilderness Study Areas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RECREATIONAL USES; ACCESS POINTS FOR 

4 PALISADES, HIGH LAKES, AND SHOAL CREEK 

5 WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS. 

6 Section 301(c) of the Wyoming Wilderness Act of 

7 1984 (Public Law 98–550; 98 Stat. 2811) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and 

9 inserting a semicolon; 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4697 IH

1 (2) by amending paragraph (4) to read as fol2 lows: 

3 ‘‘(4) subject to paragraph (5), all recreational 

4 uses occurring within such Wilderness Study Areas 

5 on the date before the day of the enactment of this 

6 Act, including horseback riding, snowmobiling, dirt 

7 bike riding, mountain biking, and helicopter skiing, 

8 shall be permitted in such Areas;’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

10 paragraphs: 

11 ‘‘(5) with respect to helicopter skiing in the 

12 Palisades Wilderness Study Area, the Secretary shall 

13 authorize the number of permitted days of helicopter 

14 skiing to be at least the number of days specified in 

15 the High Mountain Heli-Skiing Final Environmental 

16 Impact Statement for certain national forest dis17 tricts in Wyoming and Idaho issued on June 30, 

18 2005, by the Forest Service; and 

19 ‘‘(6) no recreational access points shall be con20 structed in such Wilderness Study Areas after the 

21 date of the enactment of this paragraph, except by 

22 express authorization of Congress.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
#### CURTIS v. STATE.

No. A-11780.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 9, 1953.

Coffey, Lassiter & Coffey, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

BRETT, Judge.

The plaintiff in error Bill W. Curtis, defendant below, was charged by information in the Court of Common Pleas of Tulsa county, Oklahoma, with the offense of selling intoxicating liquor in violation of Title 37, § 1, O.S.A., to wit, 1⁄2 pint of Seagram’s 7 Crown, tax paid whiskey, to John Howe, in said county and state, on or about October 31, 1951. The defendant waived a jury in open court, and with aid of counsel, withdrew his plea of not guilty, on March 25, 1952 and entered his plea of guilty, on which plea he was found guilty, and his punishment was fixed at a term of 30 days in the county jail and a fine of $60, and judgment and sentence entered accordingly; from which this appeal has been perfected.

The matter was set for oral argument hereon on December 17, 1952; no briefs were filed, and no appearance made in support of said appeal, and the case was accordingly submitted on the record. We have examined the record and find no apparent error on the face of the record. Under these conditions it has been repeatedly held that the judgment of conviction will be affirmed. Welborn v. State, Okl.Cr.App., 240 P.2d 1130 (not yet reported in State-reports). The judgment and sentence herein imposed is accordingly affirmed.

POWELL, P. J., and JONES, J., concur.
Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

A college completion rate is the percentage of persons ages 25 

and over with a bachelor’s degree or more. The percent of the 

U.S. average is computed by dividing the county college 

completion rate by the national average and multiplying by 100. 

The map uses critical breaks such as the national average to 

organize the data into groups of common values.

Map Created: March 2015

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2009–2013

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

19.4% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9% 

75.0% - 99.9% 

100.0% - 170.9%

Percent of the U.S. Average 

(Critical Breaks Classification) 

U.S. average = 28.8%

Appalachian average = 21.7%
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JUL 14, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-16188

 

D. C. Docket No. 05-20073-CIV-DLG

BKCY No. 04-01459-BKC-AJ

In Re: LOURDES MARIA RAMON, 

Debtor.

______________________________ 

JORGE L. GUERRA, 

GAYLE L. GUERRA, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

versus

LOURDES MARIA RAMON, 

 

 Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida 

 

(July 14, 2006)
2

Before TJOFLAT and CARNES, Circuit Judges, and HODGES*, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants concede that our recent decision in Guerra v. Ramon, F.3d ____

(11th Cir. June 12, 2006), controls our disposition of this appeal. We agree. The

judgment of the district court is accordingly

AFFIRMED.

___________________________

*Honorable Wm. Terrell Hodges, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida,

sitting by designation.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

ITZCHAK E. KORNFELD 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 1333 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

No. 177 DB 2007 

Attorney Registration No. 68345 

(Philadelphia) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2014, upon consideration of the Report and 

Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board and Dissenting Opinion dated August 27, 

2014, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted. 

 Pursuant to Rule 218(f), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses 

incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4725 

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to require short form call 

reports for certain depository institutions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 21, 2017 

Mr. HULTGREN (for himself and Mr. BARR) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to require 

short form call reports for certain depository institutions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Bank Re5 porting Relief Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SHORT FORM CALL REPORTS. 

7 Section 7(a) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act 

8 (12 U.S.C. 1817(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 

9 following: 

10 ‘‘(12) SHORT FORM REPORTING.— 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4725 IH

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The appropriate Fed2 eral banking agencies shall issue regulations 

3 that allow for a reduced reporting requirement 

4 for a covered depository institution when the in5 stitution makes the first and third report of 

6 condition for a year, as required under para7 graph (3). 

8 ‘‘(B) DEFINITION.—In this paragraph, the 

9 term ‘covered depository institution’ means an 

10 insured depository institution that— 

11 ‘‘(i) has less than $5,000,000,000 in 

12 total consolidated assets; and 

13 ‘‘(ii) satisfies such other criteria as 

14 the appropriate Federal banking agencies 

15 determine appropriate.’’. 

Æ 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 2.5 

**SECOND AMENDMENT TO**

**CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT**

This SECOND AMENDMENT TO CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of January 16, 2007 by and among ONEOK, Inc.,an Oklahoma corporation (“ONEOK”), ONEOK Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, formerly known as Northern Border Partners, L.P., (“ONEOK Partners“), and ONEOK Partners Intermediate Limited Partnership (the“ILP”, and together with ONEOK Partners, the “Partnerships”) (each a “Party” and together, the “Parties”). Each capitalized term used herein but not defined shall have the meaninggiven such term in of the Contribution Agreement (as defined below). 

**W I T N E S S E T H**

**WHEREAS**, the Parties previously entered into that certain Contribution Agreement dated as of February 14, 2006, as amended by that certainFirst Amendment to Contribution Agreement dated as of April 6, 2006 (collectively, the “Contribution Agreement”) and now desire to further amend the Contribution Agreement as set forth herein; 

**NOW, THEREFORE**, in consideration of the premises and mutual agreements and covenants herein contained, and intending to be legally bound hereby,the Parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 

1. Exhibit D. Exhibit D to the Contribution Agreement is deleted in its entirety andreplaced with Exhibit D attached to this Amendment. 

2. Final Closing Working Capital. The Parties acknowledge and agree that theamount of Final Closing Working Capital under Section 1.5 of the Contribution Agreement is ($11,692,774). 

**[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]**

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date set forthabove by their duly authorized representatives. 

 
ONEOK, INC.By: */s/ John W. Gibson*Name:   Title:   ONEOK Partners, L.P.By: ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C., its general partnerBy: */s/ John W. Gibson*Name:   Title:   ONEOK Partners Intermediate Limited PartnershipBy: ONEOK ILP GP, L.L.C., its general partnerBy: */s/ John W. Gibson*Name:   Title:   

Exhibit D 

(Target Working Capital as of the Balance Sheet Date)
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

PRENTISS JACKSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D21-3556

February 16, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Melissa M. Polo, 

Judge.

Rachael E. Reese and Olivia M. Goodman of O'Brien Hatfield Reese, P.A., 

Tampa, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James A. Hellickson, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior publication.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4646 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1900 Corporate Drive in Birmingham, Alabama, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal 

Thomas E. Rivers, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2017 

Mr. PALMER (for himself, Mr. BYRNE, Mrs. ROBY, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, 

Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. ADERHOLT, and Ms. SEWELL of Alabama) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1900 Corporate Drive in Birmingham, Alabama, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Thomas E. Rivers, Jr. 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL THOMAS E. RIVERS, JR. 

4 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1900 Corporate Drive in Bir7 mingham, Alabama, shall be known and designated as the 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4646 IH

1 ‘‘Lance Corporal Thomas E. Rivers, Jr. Post Office Build2 ing’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lance Corporal Thom7 as E. Rivers, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                  and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of the operations                  of the                  Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Michael S. McDevitt                                    |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Michael S. McDevitt                                             |
|   | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer |
|   | September 6, 2007                                               |

----
Map Created: March 2011

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2008

Per Capita Income Rates in Appalachia, 2008

(County Rates)

Per capita income is a measure of the total personal income of 

an area divided by the resident population of the area. The map 

uses natural breaks in the distribution to organize the data into 

groups of common values. 

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

$15,408 - $24,627

$24,628 - $28,697

$28,698 - $34,068

$34,069 - $46,559

Per Capita Income 

U.S. average = $40,166

Appalachian average = $32,411

(Natural Breaks Classification)
Exhibit
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Gammacan International Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Vered Caplan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.











Date:
                February 2, 2006
            By:*/s/**VERED
                CAPLAN*Vered
                CaplanChief
                Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ALLIED HOLDINGS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          21,977
<SECURITIES>                                    23,323
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,968
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,788
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               195,759
<PP&E>                                         297,530
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 621,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          145,730
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,853
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   621,627
<SALES>                                      1,026,799
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,026,799
<CGS>                                          988,919
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  988,919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,004
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,527
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,477
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,477
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.24
                                                                  Sales Contract
Sales Contract of Guangzhou Cityview Bus Installation Co., Ltd.

Contract number: 2004008   Signing Date: August 6,  2004           Currency: RMB

Party A: Changsha United Electric Power Science and Technology Co., Ltd.
Product Type: Hybrid Electric Power Tourist Bus
Unit Price: RMB 430,000
Quantity: One

Party B: Guangzhou Cityview Bus Installation Co., Ltd.
Down Payment: RMB 150,000
Total Payment : RMB 430,000

Information on Party A:
Payment is billed on: Changsha United Electric Power Science and Technology Co.,
Ltd.
Bank Name: Hexi Branch of Changsha Construction Bank
Account number: 1540061016900207943
Post Add: Room D on 9th floor of Xiaoyuan Buidling, Changsha,  P.C. 410000
Contact Person: Yang Weiping
Tel: 0731-8861247  Fax: 0731-2280577

Information on Party B:
Payment is to be received by: Guangzhou Cityview Bus Installation Co., Ltd.
Bank Name: Heping Branch of Zengcheng Industrial and Commercial Bank
Account number: 3602053119200000946
Post Add: Zhucun County of Zengcheng, Guangdong Province,   P.C. 511370
Contact Department: Sales Dept. of Guangzhou Cityview Bus Installation Co., Ltd.
Tel: 020-82852074  Fax: 020-82854864

Terms and Conditions:
1. Party A shall provide the electric engine and other electric-control
equipment, and entrust Party B with the installation and production of the whole
vehicle mode: SJ6110CT3 DESL hybrid power tourist bus

2. Payment Arrangement: Down payment of RMB 150,000 should be made from Party A
to Party B within three days upon signing of the contract; another payment of
RMB 130,000 should be made from Party A to Party B upon completion of the
vehicle body by the latter; final payment should be made upon delivery of the
vehicle.

3. Delivery Date: September 5, 2004

4. Delivery Way: Party A shall go to the manufacturing place of Party B to check
the vehicle; Party B shall make delivery on the delivery date after receiving
the full payment.

5. Quality Insurance: Party B shall provide one-year guarantee service free of
charge according to its quality standards.

6. Unit Price shall exclude vehicle purchase tax and plate fee.

7. Main parts of the vehicle: chassis SX6112BKB, tyre 275/70 R 22.5, whole-view
windshield, double-layered front and rear windshields, side glass window around
the vehicle body, Japanese air-conditioner, safety top window, Pioneer DVD, 17
inch LCD screen, ABS, luggage rack, rear controller for backing, electric rear
mirror, battery box, etc.


<PAGE>

8. The original contract is made in duplicate with each party holding one copy.
For any disputes in executing the contract, the two parties should negotiate and
may have recourse to relevant local court if negotiation fails.

Signed by and on behalf of Party A: /s/ Yang Weiping          (sealed)

Signed by and on behalf of Party B: /s/ Guo Shanqiang    (sealed)


                                       33
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 19, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 19, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18A0520. WILLIAM RYLES v. CITY OF STONE MOUNTAIN.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this 

Court and with Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration 

of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals 

Rule 13.

On November 09, 2017, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors 

and a brief no later than November 20, 2017. As of the date of this order, the appellant's 

enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed 

abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).