alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 02/02-0700]

Notice is hereby given that RCS SBIC Fund II, L.P., 800 Boylston Street, Boston, MA 02199, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of two small concerns, has sought an exemption under section 312 of the Act and section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). RCS SBIC Fund II, L.P. proposes to purchase assets from an Associate, Riverside Investment Management Company, LLC.

The financings are brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(4) of the Regulations because RCS SBIC Fund II, L.P., will purchase from Riverside Investment Management Company, LLC, at the amortized cost basis of each, securities issued by two Small Businesses: Oak Electric Service Intermediate, LLC; and Stratus Technology Services, L.L.C. Because Riverside Investment Management Company, LLC, is an Associate of RCS SBIC Fund II, L.P., this transaction is considered a conflict of interest requiring prior SBA approval.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction, within fifteen days of the date of this publication, to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416.

Bailey G. DeVries,

Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small Business Administration.

[FR Doc. 2024-00019 Filed 1-4-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# C_2008092EN.01003002.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/30

---

Action brought on 21 January 2008 — Wellcome Foundation v OHIM — Serono Genetics Institute (FAMOXIN)

(Case T-27/08)

(2008/C 92/63)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: The Wellcome Foundation Ltd (Greenford, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Gilbey, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Serono Genetics Institute SA (Evry, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal OHIM dated 19 November 2007 (Case R 9/2007-1) and declare the request for invalidation brought by the appellant well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal OHIM dated 19 November 2007 (Case R 9/2007-1) and declare the request for invalidation brought by the appellant well founded;

| — | annul all cost orders made against the appellant by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market and order the latter to bear the costs of the appellant. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul all cost orders made against the appellant by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market and order the latter to bear the costs of the appellant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The word mark ‘FAMOXIN’ for goods and services in class 5 — Community trade mark No 2 491 298

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Serono Genetics Institute SA

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: The national word marks ‘LANOXIN’ for goods in class 5

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the request for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 52 and 56(2) and (3) of Council Regulation No 40/94, as the Board of Appeal found the earlier trade marks to be used for ‘pharmaceutical preparations for cardiovascular illnesses’ and not ‘pharmaceutical preparations’ and as it assessed the relevant market, the relevant public, the level of attentiveness of the different parts of the relevant public and the similarity of the conflicting trade marks and goods incorrectly.

Pleas in law:

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 7, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00519

- CV

Loren BREWER

, Appellant

v.

SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION ; Schlumberger, N.V. A/K /A Schlumberger Limited; Rig Relocators, LLC; Rig Relocators; and Jose Salazar, Jr., Appellees

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 09

- 53692

- CV Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The clerk ’ s record is due September 9, 2016

. On September 2, 2016, the clerk filed a notification of late record stating the clerk ’s record would not be filed on or before September 9,
2016, because appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk ’s fee to prepare the record and appellant is not entitled to the record without paying the fee.

Accordingly, w e ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before September 19, 2016 that either (1) the clerk ’s fee has been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the clerk have been made to pay the clerk ’ s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to the clerk = s record without prepay ment of the clerk ’ s fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1 ; id . R. 35.3(a). If appellant fails to file such proof within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

See id. R. 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of September, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.2

                    ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT DATED 20TH MAY 2005

THIS ADDENDUM is made on the 14th day of July Two Thousand And Five (2005).

WHEREAS

Pursuant to the Agreement made on the 20th day of May Two Thousand And Five
(2005), between M2B COMMERCE LTD ("M2B"), and ALLSPORTS INTERNATIONAL LTD
("AI"), ("AGREEMENT"),

IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

a)       In reference to Clause 2.1, M2B agrees to increase the License fee by
         USD$1.39 million, from the USD$3.30 million to USD$4.69 million.

b)       In respect of the above, AI agrees, under Clause 2.2, to reduce the
         royalty fee payable by M2B to 1.5% of the gross revenue received in the
         digit games; from the 2.0% originally agreed in Clause 2.2.

c)       All other clauses under the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in
         force by the parties concerned.

d)       This Addendum is effective from the 14th day of July Two Thousand And
         Five (2005).

END OF CLAUSES

SIGNED by _______________
for and on behalf of
M2B COMMERCE LTD in the presence of :-

_____________  (Witness)

SIGNED by _______________
for and on behalf of
ALLSPORTS INTERNATIONAL LTD in the presence of :-

_____________  (Witness)


____________________________________         ___________________________________
Initialed by representative from M2B         Initialed by representative from AI
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6003]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair will entertain up to five requests 
for 1-minute speeches on each side of the aisle.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6234]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            PETITIONS, ETC.

  Under clause 3 of rule XII, petitions and papers were laid on the 
clerk's desk and referred as follows:

       61. The SPEAKER presented a petition of Association of 
     Pacific Island Legislatures, Guam, relative to Resolution No. 
     31-GA-10 supporting the Guam-NMI Visa-Waiver program to 
     include Russia and China; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
       62. Also, a petition of California State Lands Commission, 
     California, relative to Resolution supporting H.R. 5831; to 
     the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Combined Financial Statements at June 30, 1997 for the year ended June 30, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000909116
<NAME>              ROSEWOOD CARE CENTER OF PEORIA
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,414
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                        89
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,377
<PP&E>                                          24,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,457
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            65
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,288
<SALES>                                         22,197
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,774
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                       245
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,602
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Matrice 100-Auto Takeoff and Auto Landing FromDHWiki Auto Tabofl' 

### Use Auto Taboffto tab 

### offyour ain:raft automatically if the Ain:ndt 

### Status Indicator ia 

### flashing gmm. 

### Follow 1be steps 

### below to 

### use Aum Takeoff: 1. I a11nch the DJI Pilot app 8lld enti!£1M 

### Cament View. 

### 2. EDirlue that the aircraft is 

### inP-Made.. 3. 

### <Jo1bro1Jih the pre-flightebecldist 4. Tap

... 8lld 

### slide Collfinn to 1lb 

### off •


## ......... 5. Tbe aircratl: will

### tab offUld

### hover 1.2**meter~** 

### above the grouDd. 

### Auto I anding U111e 

### Auto I .ancting 1o land

### your aimaft 

### automaticaJly if 1he Aircra1l 

### Status Indicator ilflashing 

### green. 

### Follow 1be 

### steps below to 

### use Auto Landing: I. Bnnretbat the aircraft is 

### inP-Mode. 2. Check that the !..,ding 11m1 ill cleac before tapping 

# i to land.1be aiimdl**~** 3. The 

### aircratl: willbeginto laDd automatically. Rlltri!Mid fi:om "http:/lwiki.dji.com/cmlilllirnLphp?litla=Matriee_IOO

### Auto_Taboff_and_Auto_I.anding&aldid=23279"

• This pap wulaatmodified on 

### 21 July 2015, at 

### 05:18. • This 

### page has been acccssecl210 

### times.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, John R. Weale, certify that:
1.     I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of IPC Holdings, Ltd.;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)  [Omitted in accordance with the guidance of SEC Release No. 33-8238]
(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: February 27, 2004   /s/ John R. Weale
# Tazewell - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission Executive Director Scotty Wampler Email &#x73;&#119;a&#x6d;&#112;l&#x65;&#x72;&#64;&#x63;&#x70;&#112;d&#x63;&#46;o&#x72;&#x67;The post Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Map Created: July 2018

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2016

Per Capita Market Income Rates in Appalachia, 2016

(County Rates)

Per capita market income is a measure of an area's total 

personal income, less transfer payments, divided by the resident 

population of the area. The map uses natural breaks in the 

distribution to organize the data into groups of common values. 

0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

$9,752 - $18,556

$18,557 - $24,742

$24,743 - $32,730

$32,731 - $53,832

Per Capita Market Income

U.S. average = $40,679

Appalachian average = $29,765

(Natural Breaks Classification)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1507]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   RECOGNIZING PACIFIC METALLURGICAL AS A FINALIST FOR THE 2012 KING 
                COUNTY EXECUTIVE'S SMALL BUSINESS AWARDS

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. ADAM SMITH

                             of washington

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 13, 2012

  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I rise to honor Pacific 
Metallurgical in Kent, Washington for being named a finalist for the 
2012 King County Executive's Small Business Awards, in the Exporting 
Small Business of the Year category. The Exporting Small Business award 
is given to small businesses that have increased international sales in 
new and existing markets.
  Pacific Metallurgical is an innovative heat treating business that 
was founded in 1967. The family-owned company was one of the first 
commercial heat-treat suppliers in the King County region. The company 
has since grown and the company is today offering new equipment and 
technology worldwide.
  Mr. Speaker, it is with great pleasure that I congratulate Pacific 
Metallurgical. Advanced companies like Pacific Metallurgical help to 
stimulate our local and national economies through trade and growth.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1557-E1558]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

       IN HONOR OF CLEVELAND CITY COUNCILWOMAN PHYLLIS CLEVELAND

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 19, 2012

  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in honor of Cleveland City 
Councilwoman Phyllis Cleveland, who has been serving the Ward 5 
community since being elected to the Cleveland City Council in 2005.
  Councilwoman Cleveland has been a longtime resident of the community 
which she now represents, which includes the Central, North Broadway 
and Kinsman Union neighborhoods. The Councilwoman has spent her life in 
public and community service, working for the Cleveland Tenants 
Organization advocating for fair and affordable housing for Cuyahoga 
County residents. In 2009, Councilwoman Cleveland was chosen by Council 
President Martin J. Sweeney to serve as Majority Leader in the City 
Council.
  Councilwoman Cleveland's goal for Ward 5 has always been to build a 
strong connection between residents and the community by keeping the 
neighborhood safe, clean, and affordable. To do this, she has supported 
programs to clear the city of vacant and abandoned housing, replacing 
it with new houses and businesses. She has continued the community and 
economic development started by Mayor Frank G. Jackson when he was the 
Ward 5 Councilman.
  Mr. Speaker and Colleagues, please join me in honoring the 
accomplishments of Councilwoman Phyllis Cleveland.

[[Page E1558]]

                          ____________________
```
#### Mary Ammar et al., Respondents, v E. I. du Pont de Nemours Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants E. I. du Pont de Nemours Co., Inc., and du Pont Pharmaceuticals, Inc., appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Katz, J.), entered January 11, 1990, as denied their motion for summary judgment, and the defendants Saquib S. Chaudhry *93and Ahamed S. Moideen separately appeal from so much of the same order as denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the appeals of the defendants E. I. du Pont de Nemours Co., Inc., and du Pont Pharmaceuticals, Inc., are dismissed as abandoned, as the plaintiffs have settled with those defendants; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the defendants Chaudhry and Moideen; and it is further, Ordered that the plaintiffs are awarded one bill of costs payable by the defendants Chaudhry and Moideen.

The plaintiff Mary Ammar, who was suffering from iliofemoral thrombosis, contracted skin necrosis allegedly as a result of taking Coumadin, an anticoagulant prescribed by the defendant doctors. The plaintiffs allege that the doctors were negligent, *inter alia,*in prescribing and administering the drug. The defendant physicians contend that the affidavit of their expert convincingly demonstrated that no genuine issues of fact remain to be decided at trial and that they are thus entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Bearing in mind that upon an appeal from an order denying a motion for summary judgment, issue finding rather than issue determination is the court’s primary function *(Pizzi v Bradlee’s Div.,*172 AD2d 504; *Heller v Trustees of Town of E. Hampton,*166 AD2d 554; *Hantz v Fishman,*155 AD2d 415), we find, contrary to the doctors’ contentions, that the record and the affidavit of the plaintiffs’ expert raise material issues regarding the adequacy of the doctors’ care and supervision of the plaintiff which cannot presently be resolved as a matter of law *(see, Jankowski v Sherman,*137 AD2d 492). The denial of the motion for summary judgment made by the defendant doctors was therefore appropriate *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.