T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S UK HV I ND E R S I NG H P E L I A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 71612 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 133- 339

ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r d o f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an d M . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S ukhvi nde rS i ngh P e l i a , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of aB oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on ju d g e ’s ( “I J ” ) d e c is io n d e n y in g h is ap p lic a tio n f o ra s y lu m , w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l, a nd r e l i e f

unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED FEB 24 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 71612 2 u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rs u b s ta n tia l e v id e n c e f a c tu a l f in d in g s . Fa r a h v . A s h c r o

ft , 348 F . 3d 1153, 1156 ( 9th C i r . 2003) . W e de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. S ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the a ge nc y ’ s a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyde t e rm i na t i on ba s e d on the t e s t i m onyof B oot aS i ngh B a s i tha tthe appl i c a t i on he pr e pa r e d f or P e l i ac ont a i ne d af

abr i c a t e d c l a i m of

pe r s e c ut i on a nd ba s e d on the I J ’ s obs e rva t i ons o f P e lia ’s d e m e a n o r . See Ferna ndes v. H older , 61 9 F . 3d 10 69 , 10 75 (9th C i r. 2 0 1 0 ) ( B a s i w a s n o t ab ia s e d w itn e s s b e c au s e h e w a s u n d e rn o o b lig a tio n to coop er at e) ; S i n g h - Ka u rv . I NS , 183 F . 3d 1147, 1151 ( 9th C i r . 1999) (s peci al defe re nce gi ven t o IJ’ s dem eano r f i nd i ng ). W e r ej ec tP el i a’ s c on t ent i on thatthe IJ f a i l e d t o a na l y z e the c r e di bi l i tya nd r e l i abi l i tyof the a f f i da vi t s a nd l e tt e r s he s u b m itte d in s u p p o rt o f

h is ap p lic a tio n . See Ki n v. H older , 595 F . 3d 1050, 1058 ( 9th C i r . 2010) ( i ti s appr opr i a t e f ora n I Jt o e xa m i ne c onf l i c t i ng e vi de nc e a nd det erm i ne the truth); A lm ag hzar v. G on zales , 457 F . 3d 915, 921- 22 ( 9th C i r . 2006) (the IJdo es no tneed t o com m entspec i fi ca l l y on al l the evi dence). In the abse nce o f c r e d ib le te s tim o n y , P e lia ’s a s y lu m a n d w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l c la im s f

a il. See Far ah , 348 F . 3d a t1156.07- 71612 3 B e c aus e P e l i a ’ s C A T c l a i m i s ba s e d on the t e s t i m onythe a ge nc yf ound not c r e di bl e , a nd he poi nt s t o no e vi de nc e s how i ng i ti s m or e l i ke l ytha n nothe w i l l be to rtu r e d if

r e tu rn e d to I n d ia , h is C A T c la im a ls o f a ils . See id. a t 1 1 5 6 - 5 7 . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.