alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.**§ **1350)**     The undersigned, as the chief executive officer of ARRIS Group, Inc., certifies that to thebest of his knowledge the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, whichaccompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the quarterly report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ARRISGroup, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is madepursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied uponfor any other purpose.     Dated this 9th day of May, 2007.         /s/Robert J. Stanzione  Robert J. Stanzione   Chief Executive Officer, Chairman   
33
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4775 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4775

 To increase the rates of pay under the statutory pay systems and for 
    prevailing rate employees by 3 percent, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2018

  Mr. Connolly (for himself, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Hoyer, Ms. Norton, Mr. 
 Beyer, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Mr. Clay, Mr. Yarmuth, Ms. Kaptur, Ms. 
 Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico, Mr. Sherman, Mrs. Comstock, Ms. 
McCollum, Mr. Kilmer, Ms. Bonamici, Mr. Ruppersberger, Mr. Delaney, Mr. 
 Perlmutter, Mr. Courtney, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Slaughter, and Mr. Sires) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To increase the rates of pay under the statutory pay systems and for 
    prevailing rate employees by 3 percent, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Adjustment of Income Rates 
Act'' or the ``FAIR Act''.

SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENT TO RATES OF PAY.

    (a) Statutory Pay Systems.--For calendar year 2019, the percentage 
adjustment under section 5303 of title 5, United States Code, in the 
rates of basic pay under the statutory pay systems (as defined in 
section 5302 of title 5, United States Code) shall be 3 percent.
    (b) Prevailing Rate Employees.--Notwithstanding the wage survey 
requirements under section 5343(b) of title 5, United States Code, for 
fiscal year 2019, the rates of basic pay (as in effect on the last day 
of fiscal year 2018 under section 5343(a) of such title) for prevailing 
rate employees in each wage area and the rates of basic pay under 
sections 5348 and 5349 of such title shall be increased by 3 percent.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            3274
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           10377
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      26228
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           25484
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             25068
<LOANS>                                         273771
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  348530
<DEPOSITS>                                      284783
<SHORT-TERM>                                     25000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               3701
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                       35002
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  348530
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  20529
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 3968
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   441
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 24938
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               13596
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14417
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            10521
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      180
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   7873
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2325
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        3649
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3649
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.80
<LOANS-NON>                                        209
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1233
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       57
<RECOVERIES>                                        14
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1370
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           1370
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 15.1














April 29, 2015





The Board of Directors and Shareholders


MCG Capital Corporation





We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-137565 and Form S-8 No. 333-167494) pertaining to the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation and the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Non- Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation of our report dated April 29, 2015 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements and schedules of MCG Capital Corporation that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 .








/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4685 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4685

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2018

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 515 Hope Street in Bristol, Rhode Island, as the ``First Sergeant P. 
                   Andrew McKenna Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIRST SERGEANT P. ANDREW MCKENNA JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 515 Hope Street in Bristol, Rhode Island, shall be known and 
designated as the ``First Sergeant P. Andrew McKenna Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``First 
Sergeant P. Andrew McKenna Jr. Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2008092EN.01003701.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/37

---

Action brought on 28 January 2008 — Fusco v OHIM — Fusco International (FUSCOLLECTION)

(Case T-48/08)

(2008/C 92/74)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Vincenzo Fusco (represented by: B. Saguatti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Antonio Fusco International SA, Luxembourg (Lugano branch) (Lugano, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 24 October 2007 and amend it to the effect that the action brought by the applicant before the Board of Appeal should be considered to be well founded and, consequently, the opposition should be upheld; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 24 October 2007 and amend it to the effect that the action brought by the applicant before the Board of Appeal should be considered to be well founded and, consequently, the opposition should be upheld;

| — | order OHIM and the intervening party, Antonio Fusco International SA, to pay the costs of the present proceedings and those of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the Opposition Division. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM and the intervening party, Antonio Fusco International SA, to pay the costs of the present proceedings and those of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the Opposition Division.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Antonio Fusco International SA, Luxembourg (Lugano branch)

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark FUSCOLLECTION (application for registration No 1.503.366) in respect of goods in Classes 9, 18 and 25

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark (No 727.375) and Italian trade mark (No 489.262) ENZO FUSCO in respect of goods in Class 25

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Art 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of SIN Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on the Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Vandeberg, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (i)        the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (ii)       The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.
 
 SIN Holdings,Date: August 13, 2010

By:

/s/ James VandebergJames Vandeberg

President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director
 
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### FRANK CHIPOLONE, SR., PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLIFTON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Argued November 8, 1948

Decided November 15, 1948.

*Mr. Aaron Heller*argued the cause for the prosecutor-appellant *(Heller & Ka-iks,*attorneys).

*Mr. John G. D'luhy*argued the cause for the defendant-respondent.

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Case in the court -below.

*For affirmance:*Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices He-her, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, and Ackerson-—5.

*For reversal:*None.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Robert F. Chrestensen, Deceased. Marine Midland Bank, N. A., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition granted, in accordance with the following Memorandum: The Surrogate erred in (1) disapproving the account of the executor and directing that it be resubmitted with a recomputation of executor’s fees on the basis set forth in the court’s order and (2) awarding a guardian ad litem fee. None of the authorities relied upon by the Surrogate involved an agreement executed by the testator himself. In this case, the decedent executed his will and the trust agreement on the same day. The trust agreement clearly reflects decedent’s intent that the payment of commissions be computed on the *642combined assets of the trust and the estate, but with no double commissions payable. The will directs that the estate be distributed according to the terms of the trust agreement, thereby indirectly authorizing the manner of compensation set forth in the agreement. The agreement is not contrary to public policy and does not lack consideration since, in return for allowing computation of the executor’s commission on the combined trust and estate assets, the trustee agreed to defer one-half of its compensation until after the death of the grantor’s wife and waived its commission as executor of her estate. In addition, the agreement seeks to avoid double commissions on assets distributed as executor. Moreover, the direct beneficiaries have accepted and ratified the payment of commissions to the executor on that basis. Under these circumstances, the Surrogate erred in refusing to give effect to the express provisions of the trust agreement directing that the payment of executor’s commissions be calculated from the combined assets of the estate and the trust (SCPA 2312 [1]; *see, Matter of Boddy,*136 Mise 2d 87, 90). Furthermore, there was no need for the appointment of a guardian ad litem for allegedly unknown beneficiaries *(see,*SCPA 315 [2] [a] [iii]) and the special guardian is directed to reimburse the estate for any fee received *(see,*CPLR 5523). (Appeal from Order of Cattaraugus County Surrogate’s Court, Horey, S. — Estate Accounting.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

fl you makl? changes to the ''alues in the table below. you IIIIlS! ensure the totals updare accordingly. f/' 

they do not, click (or Tah) into aud then out <)[the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include on- access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered condition costs here and close-up) our) Products 

Inspection (up to) 0.5 ' •II I : ;0 510 l! 

l!l' .. llli (I , ' 1) 

·' ·'·'' l_,,ll!f 0 •ll 

() I •It ! I \I 'I ll Ill) 

('I)• (1 IHI ·1110 

('lit) II t'H I .I 

(; (Jt 'I {J llJ 

t) lj I t)il ;t 

(.;II) t HI! 'I 

HI ' u ()lt II 1\i 

• iJO 1, \s{l (1 d) 

I I ;IIIH I) ') 

fr! H) o on ,I I 

" ti i ill () !l!J ll J 

11 (i i l I Oil (J If) 

. d lit ' ! 'l) 

.) lll I) IJI J l) 11.1 

!l.ih " diJ (, I{J 

' Ill• (JI (; {) tl 

I) (>U {) \J{; \1.•." l 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $21,675 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0 

On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

Re-Identify (up to) 1.0 '• X. tltl $1 ,..;('I 

Remove and 9.0 " $19,700 Replace (up to) "- till -

( I 

I' < [II 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? ~ 

YES* D NO [gl 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? :-

YES* D NO IZI 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. ' 

YES D NO [gl 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? -

YES* D NO [gl 

*Explanation:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Polar Molecular Holding Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Brian P. Alleman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Brian P. AllemanBrian P. Alleman Chief Financial Officer
 April 29, 2004




This Certification is made
solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This written statement shall not be deemed to be filed as part of the annual report on Form 10-K that it accompanies.
Exhibit 99.1



Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Wild Oats Markets, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 28, 2002, as amended by
Form 10-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Perry D. Odak, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                            
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained
    in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Perry D.
    Odak
    Perry D. Odak
    Chief Executive Officer | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|April 28, 2003                                                      | 



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to sec.  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Wild Oats Markets, Inc. and will be retained by Wild Oats Markets, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-42533, No. 333-86001, No. 333-62734, No. 333-100011, and No. 333-138673, pertaining, respectively, to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated; the 1998 Stock Option Plan; the1998 Stock Option Plan, as amended; the 2001 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Option Plan and the 2002 Stock Option Plan; and the Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Option Plan), and Forms S-3 (No. 333-42367, No. 333-75821, No. 88701, No. 333- 33710, No.333-51250, No. 333-53538, No. 112513, No. 115281, No. 333-140518 and No. 148757) of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 7, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended by Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/    ODENBERG, ULLAKKO, MURANISHI & CO. LLP 

SanFrancisco, California 

March 28, 2008