alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

- 1

- 

### S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee, UNPUBLISHED February 20, 2020

v No. 346515 Wayne Circuit Court RONALD PARKER WILSON, LC No. 13

- 003780

- 01

- FC

Defendant

- Appellant.

Before: G LEICHER

, P .J., and G ADOLA and L ETICA , JJ.

P ER C URIAM

.

Defendant was convicted of two counts of assault with the intent to do great bodily harm

less than murder (AWIM)

, MCL 750.84 , and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony (felony

- firearm), MCL 750.227b . After two prior appeals to this C ourt, 1 defendant was

re sentenced to two concurrent terms of 57 months to 10 years ’ imprisonment for each AWIM

conviction to be served consecutively to a 2

- year term imposed for the felony

- firearm conviction

. For the third time, d efendant appeals his AWIM sentences as of righ t

. D efendant ’s sole argument

is that the AWIM sentences are disproportionate as they exceed the rec ommended minimum sentencing guidelines range of 19 to 38 months’ imprisonment

.

Recently, d efendant finished serving his sen tences

. 2 Accordingly, we dismiss defendant’s appeal as moot as it is impossible for us “to fashion a remedy” under these circumstances. See

1 People v Wilson

, unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued November 17, 2015 (Docket Nos. 321816 and 322074) ( Wilson I ) ; People v Wilson , unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued December 7, 2017 (Docket No. 334025) ( Wilson II )

.

2 On September 26, 2018 , the trial court re sentenced defendant for the second time

, awarding him

2

, 010 days credit for time served. Based on our calculations, defendant served his minimum

sentence on December 26, 2019, and , in fact, t he Michigan Department of Corrections’ Offender Tracking Information System reflects that he was paroled on that date

. See- 2

-

People v Rutherford , 208 Mich App 198, 204; 526 NW2d 620 (1994) ; see also MCR 7.216(A)(7) (This Court may “ enter any judgment or order or grant further or different relief as the case may require [.]”)

.

Dismissed

.

/s/ Eliz abeth L. Gleicher

/s/ Michael F. Gadola

/s/ Anica Letica

< https://mdocweb.state.mi.us/otis2/otis2profile.aspx?mdocNumber=931416 > (accessed February

12 , 2020).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

9:00 a.m. EST, Friday, January 12, 2024.

# PLACE:

Virtual meeting.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        Enforcement matters. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.cftc.gov/​*.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-5964.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: January 3, 2024.

Robert Sidman,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2024-00144 Filed 1-3-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 86350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27265]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; ASPREE-XT Renewal Review.
    Date: February 15, 2024.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Rajasri Roy, Ph.D., M.P.H, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, 
National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 496-9666, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5022313a312322397e223f29103e39387e373f26"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="196b7873786a6b70376b766059777071377e766f">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 7, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-27265 Filed 12-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6161]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             VOICE OF TEXAS: ELIZABETH FROM HOUSTON, TEXAS

  (Mr. POE of Texas asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute.)
  Mr. POE of Texas. Mr. Speaker, Elizabeth from Houston wrote me this 
about her business:

       My immigrant parents came to the United States legally. 
     They had to learn English. My dad worked very hard. He opened 
     several bars and restaurants, hired wait staff, cooks, 
     bartenders, and cleaning people. There was never a dime of 
     government assistance. Hard work, long hours, and sleepless 
     nights were the norm for all of us. I learned their work 
     ethic early, and I also have worked very hard for my family. 
     No welfare, no government handouts.
       This is my country, and I love this country as much as my 
     parents did. But I do not respect the current President or 
     his administration. They want to be in charge of all of us, 
     from cradle to grave. That is not the American way. That is 
     exactly what my parents and grandparents fled from. Please 
     take us back to the right way.

  Mr. Speaker, Elizabeth's family did it the right way--and without Big 
Government getting in the way. They built their American Dream all on 
their own.
  And that's just the way it is.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**Certificationof Annual Report**

 

I, Robert W. Benson, Chief Financial Officer of ProCyte Corporation,(the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)           the Annual Report onForm 10-K for the Company for the fiscal year period ended December 31, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(12 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)           the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  March 30, 2004 |                    |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------|
|                        |                    |
|                        |                    |
|                        | /s/ Robert W. Benson    |   |
|                        | Robert W. Benson        |
|                        | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-17-00408-CV

____________________

IN THE INTEREST OF R.E.W.

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 279th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. F-214,431-B

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

On March 22, 2018, we abated the appeal due to bankruptcy. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 8. We reinstated the appeal on the unopposed motion of the appellant, Leah 

Duplantis, to reinstate and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3(a). The 

appellant notified the Court that she no longer desires to prosecute this appeal 

because the parties have settled their dispute. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). We 

grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

 CHARLES KREGER 

 Justice

 

Submitted on November 7, 2018

Opinion Delivered November 8, 2018

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Tiao-Tsan Lai and Yun-Yi Tseng hereby jointly certify as
follows:

     (a)  They are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer,
          respectively, of City Network, Inc. (the "Company");

     (b)  To the best of their knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
          10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") complies in
          all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (c)  To the best of their knowledge, based upon a review of the Report, the
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company for the period certified.



Date: May 23, 2005                         By: /s/ Tiao-Tsan Lai
                                              -----------------------------
                                              Tiao-Tsan Lai
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)




Date: May 23, 2005                         By: /s/ Yun-Yi Tseng
                                              -----------------------------
                                              Yun-Yi Tseng
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6469]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR

  Mr. CARDIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that Freny Dessai, 
Sarah Butler, Talitha James, Amanda Sellers, Bryan Watt, Daniel Lind, 
and Daniel West, staff of the Finance Committee, be granted the 
privilege of the floor for the duration of the consideration of the 
continuing resolution.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that Paul 
Schirduan, with the Homeland Security Committee, be granted the 
privilege of the floor for the remainder of the Congress.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. HARKIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that Mike Sobaski 
and Peter Visser of my staff be granted the privilege of the floor for 
the duration of today's proceedings.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
Consent of Independent Accountants


The Board of Directors
Henry's Marketplace, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-3 (No. 333-31292, No. 333-88011, No. 333-62175, and No. 333-52747) and in the
registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-66347 and No. 333-20539) of Wild
Oats Markets, Inc. of our report dated February 5, 1999 with respect to the
statements of earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash flows of Henry's
Marketplace, Inc. for the fifty-two weeks ended December 27, 1998, which report
appears in the December 30, 2000, annual report on Form 10-K of Wild Oats
Markets, Inc.




                                    KPMG LLP


San Diego, California
March 30, 2001
# FEB f 02015

Docket Management Facility U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590 DOT Docket Management Facility; 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20229 

### U.S. Customsand Border Protection

United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Office ofAir and Marine (OAM) is requesting the renewal ofExemptionNo. 10300 under docket number FAA-2011-0688. In a letter dated January 14, 2013, this office requested an exemption to 14 CFR §91.209(a) (1) and (b), during operations ofthe Predator-B/MQ-9 Unmanned Aircraft inthe National Airspace System. Additionally this office requested that a summary ofthe petitionnot be published inthe Federal Register due to the potential security-sensitivity ofthe exemption, which the FAA also granted. Ifthe FAA approves the renewal ofexemption No. 10300, this office is requesting again that it not be published inthe Federal Register. Justification for this renewal request remains the same as the original request dated May 23, 2011. CBP has evidence that entities engaging in illicit activity along the borders are actively surveilling the night skies for the presence ofthe Predator "B", which is clearly visible due to the anti-collision lights and positionlights. Additionally, evidence exists thatNight Vision devices are also being used to detect the Predator "B". The point ofcontact for this renewal is Joseph Pavero, Domain Operations and Integration. He can be reached at 202-325-3957 andjoseph.pavero@dhs.gov. Sincerely,

Richard Booth Director Domain Operations and Integration U.S. Customs & Border Protection Office ofAir and Marine
Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

A high school completion rate is the percentage of persons ages 

25 and over with a high school diploma or more. The percent of the 

U.S. average is computed by dividing the county high school 

completion rate by the national average and multiplying by 100. 

The map uses critical breaks such as the national average to 

organize the data into groups of common values.

Map Created: March 2015

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2009–2013

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

64.2% - 74.9%

75.0% - 84.9%

85.0% - 99.9%

100.0% - 108.2%

Percent of the U.S. Average 

(Critical Breaks Classification) 

U.S. average = 86.0%

Appalachian average = 84.6%
#### Bert CRISP, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12154.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

June 22, 1955.

*454Duffy & Johnson, Ponca City, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., James P. Garrett, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error. ' ,

JONES, Presiding'Judge.

The defendant, Bert Crisp, was sentenced to serve 90 days in the county jail and pay a fine of $200 after conviction in the County Court of Kay County for driving an automobile on the highway while intoxicated.

The sole question presented by the appeal is whether the sentence was excessive,.

The proof shows that the' defendant while driving an old model automobile on a street in Ponca City -turned a corner and struck the rear end of an automobile parked at the curb which caused his bumper to lock with the bumper of the automobile which 'was struck. Defendant was driving his car in low gear at the time and testified that he was driving slowly waiting on a car ahead of him to finish backing from the curb so that he could park his car. Only nominal damage was done to the cars. After the bumpers on the cars had locked, defendant rocked his car back ánd forth until they were disengaged and he then parked his automobile and walked into a drug store where he was engaged’in drinking a Coca-Cola at the time traffic policemen arrived to investigate. The policemen and others testified defendant was intoxicated. Defendant denied that he was intoxicated, but admitted that about two hours before the collision he had drunk two bottles of beer and that the preceding night he had been fishing with a companion on the river and the two of them together had consumed six bottles of beer. According to the record it was the defendant’s first alleged offense.

We have on occasion in the past because of special circumstances in the particular case, modified first offenses of driving an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor to as low as a fine of $100 and costs. Russell v. State, 76 Okl.Cr. 198, 135 P.2d 1003; Scott v. State, 80 Okl.Cr. 259, 158 P.2d 728. The Legislature has recently enacted a law fixing a minimum punishment of 10 days in the county jail for the first offense, of driving an automobile while intoxicated. Of course this act was passed subsequent to the institution of this prosecution and is not applicable but it does ‘show the public policy of the State towards *455these offenders. Pursuant to the statute tinder which this prosecution was instituted the accused could have been assessed just a fine but he also could have been assessed a jail sentence of not to exceed one year. 47 O.S.195-1 § 93, as amended, Laws 1953, page 191.

It is our conclusion in view of all the facts and circumstances of this case that justice will be served by modifying the sentence imposed upon the defendant .from 90 days in the county jail and a fine of $2Q0,to 30 days in the county jail and a fine of $100 and the judgment and sentence as thus modified is affirmed.

BRETT and POWELL, JJ., concur.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-83,329-02

EX P ARTE LEO NARDO VA SQUEZ, Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 2012-DCR- 2913-B IN THE 138 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM CAM ERON COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Te x . C ri m . App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated kidnappingand sente nced to thirty year s’ imprisonment. Applicant contends t h at his counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca use he failed to timely file a notice of appea l. We rema nded this application to the trial court for finding s of fac t and conclusions of law

. The trial court has deter

mined that counsel was timely appointed, but was never notified of that appointment, so did not take steps to perf ect an appea l of this cause . The trial court rec ommends2

g ranting an out-of-time appea l. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-oftime appea l of the ju dg ment of conviction in Cause No. 2012-DCR-2913 from the 138 District t h Court of Cameron County due to a brea kdown in the sy stem. Ex parte Riley , 193 S.W .3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Applicant is order ed returne d to that time at which he may g ive a written notice of appea l so that h e may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaning ful appea l. Wit hin ten day s of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial co urt s h al l immediately appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant on direc t appea l. All time limit s shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosec ute an app eal, he must take aff irmative steps to file a written notice of appea l in the trial court within 30 day s after the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Crimin a l J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: J anuar

y 25, 2017 Do not publish
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 3 to the Quarterly Report of Verdisys, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr. Ron Robinson, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Dr. Ron Robinson
|--------------------
|                    
|Name:               
|Title:              
|Date:               

A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Verdisys, Inc. and will be retained by Verdisys, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### Mary Stuart NAYLOR, Adm’x, etc., et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DIVISION OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS, in Equity and In Bankruptcy, et al.

No. 11274.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

June 19, 1939.

S. S. Hargraves, of Forrest City, Ark., and Winstead Johnson, of Memphis, Tenn., for appellants.

Ross Mathis, of Cotton Plant, Ark., and Burk Mann and R. B. McCulloch, both of Forrest City, Ark., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed at costs of appellants but without taxation of statutory attorneys’ docket fee in favor of appellees, per stipulation of parties.