alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4635 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to increase the number of peerto-peer counselors providing counseling for women veterans, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 13, 2017 

Mr. COFFMAN (for himself and Ms. ESTY of Connecticut) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to increase the 

number of peer-to-peer counselors providing counseling 

for women veterans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PEER-TO-PEER COUNSELING PROGRAM FOR 

4 WOMEN VETERANS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1720F(j) of title 38, 

6 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(4)(A) As part of the counseling program under this 

9 subsection, the Secretary shall ensure that the program 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4635 IH

1 includes a sufficient number of peer counselors for women 

2 veterans to meet the demand for such counselors. Such 

3 counselors may be employees of the Department and may 

4 have expertise in— 

5 ‘‘(i) gender-specific issues and services; 

6 ‘‘(ii) the provision of information about services 

7 and benefits provided under laws administered by 

8 the Secretary; and 

9 ‘‘(iii) employment mentoring. 

10 ‘‘(B) In carrying out this paragraph, the Secretary 

11 shall emphasize facilitating peer-to-peer counseling for 

12 women veterans who suffered sexual trauma while serving 

13 in the Armed Forces, have post-traumatic stress disorder 

14 or suffer from another mental health condition, or are oth15 erwise at risk of becoming homeless. 

16 ‘‘(C) The Secretary shall conduct outreach to inform 

17 women veterans about the program and the assistance 

18 available under the program. 

19 ‘‘(D)(i) In carrying out this paragraph, the Secretary 

20 shall facilitate engagement and coordination with such 

21 community organizations, State and local governments, in22 stitutions of higher education, chambers of commerce, 

23 local business organizations, organizations that provide 

24 legal assistance, and other organizations as the Secretary 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4635 IH

1 considers appropriate to facilitate the transition of women 

2 described in subparagraph (A) into their communities. 

3 ‘‘(ii) To the degree practicable, the Secretary shall 

4 coordinate facilitation of assistance under this paragraph 

5 with the program carried out under section 1144 of title 

6 10.’’. 

7 (b) FUNDING.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

8 shall carry out paragraph (4) of section 1720F(j) of title 

9 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), using 

10 funds otherwise made available to the Secretary. No addi11 tional funds are authorized to be appropriated by reason 

12 of such paragraph. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1514-E1515]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            IN HONOR OF OHIO STATE REPRESENTATIVE MIKE FOLEY

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 13, 2012

  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor State Representative 
Mike Foley of Ohio's 14th House District.
  Representative Foley was appointed to represent the 14th District in 
May of 2006 and won the formal election in November of that same year; 
he has now been serving for four terms.

[[Page E1515]]

  Representative Foley's legislative career has been marked by his 
passion and advocacy for housing issues, as exemplified by his current 
role as Chairman of the Housing Urban Revitalization Committee. In the 
mid-1980s, he became a community organizer for the St. Clair-Superior 
Coalition where he took responsibility for neighborhood safety and 
block club organization. He later became a field representative for 
Cleveland's Community Relations Board followed by roles as a court 
administrator, personal bailiff, and judicial clerk at the Cleveland 
Municipal Housing Court.
  In 1997, Representative Foley began work at the Cleveland Tenants 
Organization where he eventually became Executive Director during his 9 
year tenure. His work with the organization helped bring in over $160 
million in affordable housing projects performed by local union 
laborers and helped organize the largest rent strike in Ohio history--a 
protest against a 25 percent rent increase towards senior citizens by 
out-of-state landlords.
  Representative Foley also advocates for issues such as alternative 
energy, the environment, retiree benefits, consumer rights and tax code 
reform. He serves as a member of the Alternative Energy; Civil and 
Commercial Law; and Ways and Means committees.
  Mr. Speaker and colleagues, please join me in honoring the 
achievements of State Representative Mike Foley.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2008107EN.01003802.xml

| 26.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/38

---

Action brought on 23 February 2008 — ars Parfum Creation & Consulting v OHIM (shape of a perfume bottle)

(Case T-104/08)

(2008/C 107/65)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: ars Parfum Creation & Consulting GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: A. Späth and G. Hasselblatt, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 November 2007 (Case No R 1656/2006-1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 November 2007 (Case No R 1656/2006-1);

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the three-dimensional trade mark in the shape of a perfume bottle for goods in class 3 (Application No 4 995 361).

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Dismissal of the application.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Rejection of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), because the trade mark applied for has a distinctive character.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Thomas P. Reed, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Huntington PreferredCapital, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize, and report financial information; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: May 13, 2005                                                                   /s/ Thomas P. Reed         Thomas P. Reed, Vice President         (chief financial officer)
Customer Service Hotline: 1

- 800

- 438

- 2474 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

- 2029

February 16, 2011

Mr. Michael Krancer

, Acting Secretary

Department of Environmental Protection

Rachel Carson State Office Building

P.O. B ox 2063

Harrisburg, PA 17105

- 2063

Dear Secretary Krancer :

The U.S. E nvironmental P rotection A gency (EPA) received a revision to the

Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Department of Environmental Protection

pertaining to amendments and addition to 25 Pa Code Chapter 129 submitted by your

predecessor on October 1, 2010 . Specifically

, the revision concerns amendments to Sections

129.51 and 129.52 (relating to general and to surface coating processes, respectively) and

addition of a new Se ction 129.52a (relating to control of VOC emissions from large appliances

and metal furniture surface coating processes) . EPA has determined that the submittal is

administra tively and technically complete an d is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Propose d

Rulemaking.

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to

Mr. Christopher Cripps

, Office of Air Program Planning

, at (215) 814

- 2179

. He is the principal

contact for this rulemaking.

Sincerely,

/s/

Diana Esher, Director

Air Protection Division

cc: Joyce Epps, PA

- DEP

Arleen Shulman, PA

- DEP

Susan Hoyle, PA

- DEP
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gordon Barber, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds *(see,*CPL 30.30) was properly denied. The motion was not made upon reasonable notice to the People as required by CPL 210.45 (1) *(see, People v Weaver,*162 AD2d 486, 487, *lv denied*76 NY2d 868; *see also, People v Lawrence,*64 NY2d 200). Moreover, the sworn allegations in support of the motion failed to establish entitlement to dismissal of the indictment *(see,*CPL 210.45 [4], [5]; *People v Lomax,*50 NY2d 351, 357). In any event, the record establishes that the People announced their readiness in open court on November 25, 1988, within six months of the commencement of the criminal proceeding and were in fact ready to proceed (see, CPL 30.30 [1] [a]; *People v Kendzia,*64 NY2d 331, 337-338).

Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the court erred in permitting the testimony of certain prosecution witnesses which improperly bolstered the victim’s testimony *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]) and we decline to reach the issue in the interest of justice *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6]).

The trial court erroneously permitted Investigator Pietrantoni to give improper rebuttal testimony with respect to a collateral matter *(see, People v Alvino,*71 NY2d 233, 247). The error, however, was harmless because the proof of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming and there is no significant probability that, but for the error, the jury would have acquitted defendant *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 242).

We conclude that the trial court properly sentenced defendant as a persistent felony offender *(see,*CPL 400.20; *People v Barber,*154 AD2d 882, *lv denied*75 NY2d 810; *People v Barber,*149 AD2d 984, *lv denied*74 NY2d 805). Although a writ of habeas corpus was granted to defendant by the United States District Court for the Western District of New York based on an inordinate delay in perfecting his appeal from a 1974 conviction for attempted rape in the first degree, this Court is not bound by the determinations of lower Federal courts on questions involving Federal constitutional law *(see,*
      *561
      *People v Kin Kan, 78*NY2d 54; *Flanagan v Prudential-Bache Sec.,*67 NY2d 500, 506, *cert denied*479 US 931). We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. — Sodomy, 1st Degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Lawton, Lowery and Davis, JJ.
EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



EXHIBIT 32.1



I, Craig H. Barratt, the chief executive officer of Atheros Communications, Inc. (the
Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,:



|(i) | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 9, 2004



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Craig H. Barratt                 
|Craig H. Barratt                     
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4738 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4738

 To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to provide complaint and 
    burden of proof requirements for certain actions for breach of 
                            fiduciary duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2018

  Mr. Emmer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on 
   the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to provide complaint and 
    burden of proof requirements for certain actions for breach of 
                            fiduciary duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mutual Fund Litigation Reform Act''.

SEC. 2. COMPLAINT AND BURDEN OF PROOF REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN ACTIONS 
              FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY.

    Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-
35(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) In any such action brought by a security holder of a 
        registered investment company on behalf of such company--
                    ``(A) the complaint shall state with particularity 
                all facts establishing a breach of fiduciary duty, and, 
                if an allegation of any such facts is based on 
                information and belief, the complaint shall state with 
                particularity all facts on which that belief is formed; 
                and
                    ``(B) such security holder shall have the burden of 
                proving a breach of fiduciary duty by clear and 
                convincing evidence.''.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered December 29, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01017-CV

KALA DHARMA, Appellant

V.

WHITLEY PENN, LLP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-12551

ORDER

We GRANT court reporter Georgina E. T. Ware’s December 17, 2015 request for 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record and ORDER the record be filed no later than 

January 19, 2016.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1

      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Allied Holdings, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-72053, No. 333-51104, No. 333-62440, No. 333-91942, and No. 333-107455) on
Form S-8 of Allied Holdings, Inc. of our report dated April 15, 2005, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Allied Holdings, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' (deficit) equity and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and the related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the Allied Holdings, Inc.
2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
April 15, 2005
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-129270, 333-121495, 333-110011, 333-104397, 333-64268,333-39276, 333-24407, 333-10115, 333-09157 on Form S-8 of our report dated April 2, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule of NetManage, Inc. and subsidiaries (which expresses anunqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph concerning the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004) *“Share-Based Payment”* effective January 1, 2006) appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of NetManage, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

April 2, 2007
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of Northeastern Aviation Corp., Respondent 

FAADocketNo. FAA-2014-0812 

Case No. 2012EA110028 

Judge Sullivan 

AGENCY'S WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

The Agency, under 14 CFR Section 13.215 and pursuant to a settlement 

agreement, withdraws its Complaint in this matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Peter J. Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

for Enforcement 

By: ~~~ 

Zaclbry(M. Berman 

Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office ofthe Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division, Northeast Team 

l Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

T: 718-553-3258 

F: 718-995-5699 

E: Zachary.Berman@FAA.GOV 

1 

Dated: Aprill2, 2016 

RECEIVED 

APR 1 8 2016 

HEARING DOCKET' 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this day copies of the foregoing Agency's Withdrawal of 

Complaint were sent first class mail and fax as follows: 

Judge J. E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

I hereby certify that on this day copies of the foregoing Agency's Withdrawal of 

Complaint were sent first class mail and email as follows: 

Mr. Edward J. Longosz, II 

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellot, LLC 

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 12trh Floor 

Washington, DC 20006 

Email: Elongosz@eckertseamans.com 

I hereby certify that on this day copies of the foregoing Agency's Withdrawal of 

Complaint were sent first class mail as follows: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 

Date: April12, 2016 

LfsaHooks 

' 

aralegal Specialist 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

2
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tari Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  November 15, 2006


                                     /s/  Theodore Tsagkaris
                                     ------------------------------
                                     Theodore Tsagkaris
                                     Secretary, Treasurer & C.F.O.
                                     (Principal Financial Officer and
                                     Principal Accounting Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Matthews, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Diaz, J.), rendered May 30, 1989, convicting defendant after a jury trial of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, and robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent, indeterminate terms of imprisonment of twelve and one-half to twenty-five years, to run consecutively to a previously unrelated imposed sentence of twenty-five to fifty years, unanimously affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s argument we find that the victim’s identification testimony was legally sufficient. *(People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621.) The incident, which lasted several minutes, occurred in a well-lighted elevator and well-lighted stairwell. The victim’s description to the police was consistent with defendant’s appearance and she identified him at a pre-trial lineup.

Defendant is not entitled to a modification of his sentence because the trial court at sentencing mentioned that defendant’s conviction in the earlier New York County case was on appeal. We find ample justification for the sentence imposed. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.