alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 4.2 


          Amendment to Specimen Common Stock Certificate



The Specimen Common Stock Certificate has been amended by modifying the
sentence at the end of the first paragraph on the reverse side thereof, as
indicated below:


[first paragraph on reverse side of amended Specimen Stock Certificate:]


     This certificate also evidences and entitles the holder hereof to
certain Rights as set forth in the Rights Agreement, dated as of July 6,
1995 (the "Rights Agreement"), between Belden Inc. and First Chicago Trust
Company of New York as Rights Agent, the terms of which are hereby
incorporated herein by reference and a copy of which is on file at the
principal offices of Belden Inc.  Under certain circumstances, as set forth
in the Rights Agreement, such Rights will be evidenced by separate
certificates and will no longer be evidenced by this certificate.  Belden
Inc. will mail to the holder of this certificate a copy of the Rights
Agreement, as in effect on the date of mailing, without charge promptly
after receipt of a written request therefor.  Under certain circumstances
set forth in the Rights Agreement, Rights issued to, or held by, any Person
who is, was or becomes an Acquiring Person or any Affiliate or Associate
thereof (as such terms are defined in the Rights Agreement), whether
currently held by or on behalf of such Person or by any subsequent holder,
may become null and void.  *[ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C. has
superseded First Chicago Trust Company of New York as Rights Agent.]

* []Denotes modified sentence<PAGE>
Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2010–2014

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

A college completion rate is the percentage of persons ages 25 

and over with a bachelor’s degree or more. The percent of the 

U.S. average is computed by dividing the county college 

completion rate by the national average and multiplying by 100. 

The map uses critical breaks such as the national average to 

organize the data into groups of common values.

Map Created: September 2016

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2010–2014

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

20.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9% 

75.0% - 99.9% 

100.0% - 171.8%

Percent of the U.S. Average 

(Critical Breaks Classification) 

U.S. average = 29.3%

Appalachian average = 22.2%
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6000]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. CUMMINGS:
       H.R. 6390.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 18
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1564]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               HONORING THE FRANCO AMERICAN WAR VETERANS

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. MICHAEL H. MICHAUD

                                of maine

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 19, 2012

  Mr. MICHAUD. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize the Franco 
American War Veterans (FAWV) on their 80th Anniversary, and Post 31 of 
Lewiston, Maine on their 25th Anniversary.
  In early 1932, veterans of World War I began meeting in Massachusetts 
to establish a veteran's organization for veterans of French decent. 
They gathered signatures and were granted a charter by the Commonwealth 
of Massachusetts. In the succeeding years, posts were formed around 
Massachusetts, and quickly expanded to Rhode Island, Connecticut, New 
Hampshire, and Maine.
  This year, Post 31 of Lewiston, Maine celebrates its 25th 
Anniversary. Post 31 is an integral part of the Lewiston/Auburn 
community. Members of the Post have served as national officers in 
FAWV, and as leaders in the community. Among their many 
accomplishments, members of Post 31, through their work on the L/A 
Veterans' Council, helped establish and maintain the Veterans' Park in 
Lewiston and helped convince the Department of Veterans' Affairs to 
locate its new community based outpatient clinic in Lewiston. In 
addition, the Post 31 Color Guard participates in many ceremonies each 
year, and their presence helps enhance the ceremony.
  Mr. Speaker, please join me in congratulating the Franco American War 
Veterans on their 80th Anniversary and Post 31 of Lewiston, Maine, on 
their 25th Anniversary.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 21
                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant


1.   Western  Energy  Management,  Inc.,  is a  Delaware  corporation  and  is a
     wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

2.   Onsite/TCC  Corp.  ("Onsite/TCC")  is a  Delaware  corporation  and  was  a
     wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company until February 1997.

3.   Television City Cogen, L.P. ("TCC"),  is a California Limited  Partnership.
     The Company,  directly or indirectly through  Onsite/TCC,  owned all of the
     general and limited partnership interests in TCC until February 1997.

4.   Onsite Business  Services,  Inc. ("OBS"),  is a Kansas corporation and is a
     wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.


<PAGE>


5.   Onsite/Mid-States,  Inc.,  is a Kansas  corporation  and is a  wholly-owned
     subsidiary of OBS.

6.   SYCOM ONSITE  Corporation is a Delaware  corporation  and is a wholly-owned
     subsidiary of the Company.

7.   Lighting Technology  Services,  Inc., is a California  corporation and is a
     wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

8.   Onsite  Energy  de  Panama,  S.A.  is a  Panamanian  corporation  and  is a
     wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,881
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                       434
<INVENTORY>                                      8,193
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,635
<PP&E>                                          58,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,551
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,650
<BONDS>                                         12,060
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,754
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           656
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,379
<SALES>                                         24,673
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,074
<CGS>                                           16,306
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,443
<INCOME-TAX>                                       871
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,452
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,452
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21




</TABLE>
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 23-02

TO: Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants

Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics

Veterinary Services Leadership Team

FROM: David M. White

Acting Director

SUBJECT: Issuance of a Conditional License for American Foulbrood

The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has issued a conditional 

United States Veterinary Biological Product License to Diamond Animal Health, Inc., 

Establishment No. 213, Des Moines, Iowa, for the manufacture and distribution of

Paenibacillus Larvae Bacterin.

A veterinary biological product regulated under the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act must be 

shown to be pure, safe, potent, and efficacious before a veterinary biological product 

license may be issued. The regulations in title 9, Code of Federal Regulations, part 

102, regarding the licensing of veterinary biological products provide that a conditional 

veterinary biological product license may be issued to meet an emergency condition, 

limited market, local situation, or special circumstance. The special circumstance 

addressed here is disease in honeybees caused by Paenibacillus larvae (American 

Foulbrood).

Conditionally licensed products are required to be pure and safe, and have a reasonable 

expectation of efficacy. This conditional license was issued on the basis that the 

licensee has demonstrated that the product has a reasonable expectation of efficacy. 

APHIS will evaluate their progress throughout the next year. The conditional license 

will expire two years from the date of the license.

Animal and Plant

Health Inspection

Service

Veterinary Services

Center for Veterinary

Biologics

1920 Dayton Avenue

PO Box 844

Ames, IA 50010

(515) 337-6100
Map Created: October 2013

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2007–2011

High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2007–2011

(County Rates)

A high school completion rate is the percentage of persons ages 

25 and over with a high school diploma or more. The map uses 

natural breaks in the distribution to organize the data into groups 

of common values. 

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

56.1% - 70.9%

71.0% - 77.7%

77.8% - 84.0%

84.1% - 92.9%

Completion Rate 

U.S. average = 85.4%

Appalachian average = 83.5%

(Natural Breaks Classification)
Per capita market income is a measure of an area's total 

personal income, less transfer payments, divided by the 

resident population of the area. The percent of the U.S. 

average is computed by dividing the county per capita 

market income by the national average and multiplying by 

100. The map uses critical breaks such as the national 

average to organize the data into groups of common values.

Map Created: July 2018

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2016

Relative Per Capita Market Income Rates in Appalachia, 2016

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

24.0% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.9%

100.0% - 132.3%

Percent of the U.S. Average

U.S. average = $40,679

Appalachian average = $29,765

(Critical Breaks Classification)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1507]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               HONORING MAJOR GENERAL JANET L. COBB, USAR

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. JO BONNER

                               of alabama

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 13, 2012

  Mr. BONNER. Mr. Speaker, I rise to extend congratulations to a 
distinguished South Alabamian who was recently promoted to the rank of 
major general in the United States Army Reserve. Maj. Gen. Janet Cobb's 
service to her country is a credit to the professionalism and 
dedication of our military and we are proud to have her call South 
Alabama home.
  Maj. Gen. Cobb is a graduate of Foley High School and the University 
of Alabama. After enlisting in the Army Reserve in 1974, she was 
commissioned a Second Lieutenant in May 1978 from the University of 
Alabama ROTC program. Maj. Gen. Cobb is a graduate of the U.S. Army 
Command and General Staff College and the U.S. Army War College.
  Maj. Gen. Cobb has commanded at the Detachment, Battalion, Brigade, 
General Officer and Directorate command levels. Her deployments include 
1184th Transportation Terminal Unit, Saudi Arabia (July-November 1991), 
1184th Transportation Terminal Battalion, Port of Ash Shuaybah, Kuwait 
(November 2002-May 2003), 598th Transportation Group (Terminal) 
Rotterdam, The Netherlands (2007), and the Central Command Deployment & 
Distribution Operations Center, Camp Arifjan, Kuwait (2011). In July 
2012, Maj. Gen. Cobb completed a six-month mobilization at the Pentagon 
where she served as Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff (Operations), 
Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Logistics (G-4). She is 
currently assigned to the Pentagon as Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff, 
Mobilization and Training (Reserve Component Integration), Department 
of the Army (G-4).
  While still a colonel, Janet commanded the 1184th Transportation 
Terminal Battalion from Mobile during the second Gulf War. Of her 
service, the Mobile Press Register observed, ``Under Cobb's command, 
the 1184th became well-known among coalition forces in Kuwait not only 
for unloading a record amount of U.S. military cargo through a Kuwaiti 
port in 2003, but also for staging a Mobile-style Mardi Gras parade 
over there, in which Moon Pies, beads and cups were thrown.''
  Her awards include the Bronze Star, the Meritorious Service Medal 
with oak leaf clusters, and the Joint Achievement Medal.
  In civilian life, Maj. Gen. Cobb is employed with Kaiser Realty, Inc. 
in Gulf Shores. She is a resident of the Barnwell community in south 
Baldwin County.
  Mr. Speaker, I join my fellow Alabamians in not only expressing deep 
pride in Maj. Gen. Cobb's contributions to her country, but also in 
offering our heartfelt congratulations for her recent promotion and 
wish her all the best in the future.

                          ____________________
```
October 19, 2015

Mr. Jay Biddle

P.O. Box 51

Snow Hill, MD 21863

Dear Mr. Biddle :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request, posted to the public docket on July 22, 2015

, and filed in

D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 3093 , but we are unable to process your request any further. Your

petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider

the request any further, you must send us all of the fo llowing:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support you r request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notif ying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
# C_2008313EN.01004202.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/42

---

Action brought on 29 September 2008 — SAZAS v Commission

(Case T-420/08)

(2008/C 313/77)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Združenje skladateljev, avtorjev in založnikov za zaščito avtorskih pravic Slovenije (Sazas) (Trzin, Slovenia) (represented by: M. Favart, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Article 3 of the Commission Decision of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA (Case COMP/C2/38698 — CISAC); and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Article 3 of the Commission Decision of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA (Case COMP/C2/38698 — CISAC); and

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By means of the present application, the applicant seeks, pursuant to Article 230 EC, the annulment of Article 3 of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA (Case COMP/C2/38698 — CISAC) alleging that 24 of CISAC's (1) EEA based societies, including the applicant, engaged in a concerted practice ‘by coordinating the territorial delineations of the reciprocal representation mandates granted to one another in a way which limits a licence to the domestic territory of each collecting society’.

1

The main pleas and arguments are similar or identical to those raised in Case T-413/08.

---

(1)  Refers to the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (‘CISAC’).

1

---
#### In the Matter of Latisha V. and Others. Segundo V., Appellant.

— In consolidated child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Palmer, J.), dated June 25, 1990, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, also dated June 25, 1990, made after a hearing, finding that the father had abused the children, placed them under the supervision of their mother for a period of 12 months. The appeal from the order of disposition brings up for review a resettled order of disposition of the same court, dated July 16,1990 (CPLR 5517 [a] [2]).

Ordered that the appeal from the order of disposition dated June 25, 1990, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order of disposition dated July 16,1990, made upon resettlement; and it is further,

Ordered that the resettled order of disposition dated July 16,1990, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Following a fact-finding hearing, the Family Court determined that the petitioner had sexually abused his daughter Latisha. On appeal, the father contends that the evidence presented at the hearing did not provide sufficient corroboration of the child’s out-of-court statement *(see,*Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [vi]). We disagree.

At the fact-finding hearing, a caseworker assigned to investigate the allegations of abuse testified that Latisha told her. that she was sexually abused by her father on a number of occasions. Further, a child psychologist who examined the child testified that the child repeated these allegations to him and that her statements, and behavior, were consistent with the five stages of the inter-familial child sex abuse syndrome. We find that the validating evidence of the child psychologist constituted sufficient corroboration of Latisha’s statement to support the determination of the court *(see, Matter of Linda K,*132 AD2d 149, 152; *Matter of Nicole V, 71*NY2d 112). Moreover, although the medical evidence was equivocal on the *840issue of sexual abuse, physical evidence is not essential to establish sexual abuse *(see, Matter of Linda K., supra,*at 158). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1
to the Annual Report of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 26, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Lawrence J. Blanford, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 11, 2010



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/ LAWRENCE J.
BLANFORD             
|Lawrence J. Blanford*                
|President and Chief Executive Officer



|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and will be retained by Green
Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5922]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY STATEMENT

  Pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives, the following statements are submitted regarding the 
specific powers granted to Congress in the Constitution to enact the 
accompanying bill or joint resolution.
```