alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11/2019 Guidelines for Regulated Garbage Record Keeping 1

Guidelines for Regulated Garbage Record Keeping

All records must be kept for a minimum of three years. Each company that 

handles regulated garbage must develop a record keeping system that includes 

the following:

Records of the collection, transportation, storage, transfer, and processing 

of regulated garbage. Note: Depending on the regulated garbage handling 

function of your company, not all bullets below will apply.

Date and time regulated garbage was received

Entity or location from which the regulated garbage was received 

(cleaning company, flight #, etc.)

The amount (weight, volume, number of units-bags, bins or 

containers) of the regulated garbage received

The amount (weight, volume, number of units-bags, bins or 

containers) of the regulated garbage transported to processor or next 

establishment under a regulated garbage compliance agreement

Date garbage was picked up from the establishment for transport by 

hauler

The amount of regulated garbage that was picked up for transport by 

hauler

Name of vehicle driver or company employee handling the regulated 

garbage

The date the regulated garbage was processed

The amount of regulated garbage processed

Documentation of notification of APHIS/CBP when the emergency 

back-up plan is implemented

Records of disinfectant and sanitizer used in association with the handling 

of regulated garbage. This includes disinfectant used for both routine 

cleaning and disinfection and spills. Records must include at a minimum:

Date of disinfectant or sanitizer use

Specific location of disinfectant or sanitizer use

Name of disinfectant or sanitizer used

Volume and concentration of disinfectant or sanitizer used

Documentation of notification of APHIS/CBP when there is a 

regulated garbage spill outside of the facility

Records of regulated garbage training provided to employees and any 

subcontractors if applicable. The training records must include:
Guidelines for Regulated Garbage Record Keeping

2 Guidelines for Regulated Garbage Record Keeping 11/2019

The date of the training

The name (s) of the trainees

The specific topics covered during the training

The name of the trainer
##### 



Exhibit 10.37 Asyst Technologies, Inc.
Compensation Program for Non-employee Directors
Effective July 1, 2003
Amended June 27, 2005 Program Element
    
    DescriptionSign-on stock award to new directors for continuing service
    
    Stock award in conjunction with continued service $120,000 value at award, vesting over 3 years
from the date of award value determined by the trading price of the
Companys Common Stock at the date of award shares subject to such award may not be sold
until after the recipient has ceased to be a
board memberBoard member  annual cash retainer
    
    $35,000Board member  per meeting fees
    
    $2,000 in person, or $1,000 if by telephone (when such
meeting is as the Board)No incremental meeting fees for the Board chair (if a
non-executive chair)Committee member  annual cash retainer Audit
    
     $5,000 Compensation
    
     $5,000 Governance and Nominating
    
     $5,000Committee member  per meeting fees
    
    $1,000 in person, or $500 if by telephone
(when such meeting is as a committee) Audit Compensation Governance and Nominating Specially appointed committees
    
    No incremental meeting fees for the committee chairCommittee chair  annual cash retainer Audit
    
     Audit: $10,000 Compensation
    
     Compensation: $7,500 Governance and Nominating
    
     Governance: $7,500Additional committee fees
    
    $10,000 annual cash retainer for designated Audit
Committee Financial Expert
(unless if also the committee chair)




---



##### 



Program Element
    
    DescriptionAnnual stock award to new and existing directors for continuing
    
    Stock award in conjunction with continued serviceservice
    
     $60,000 value, vesting over 36 months from the
date of award value determined by the trading price of the
Companys Common Stock at the beginning of the
respective fiscal year shares subject to such award may not be sold
during the 36-month period (unless the
recipient has ceased to be a board member)Subsidiary directors Non-management director  annual cash retainer
    
     $5,000 Non-management director  meeting fees
(board, committee or project)
    
     No additional compensationFees for special projects/meetings U.S.
    
    None (unless specifically approved) Outside U.S.
    
    $1,000 per day or $5,000 per assignment out of the
country (as determined by the Board)
 All annual retainer payments and annual stock awards to be pro-rated, based on term of relevant service. Prohibitions on sale of shares subject to permitted sale of incremental shares to cover taxes or fees
assessed on imputed or other income. Vesting of awards may be accelerated upon termination of Board service due to death or disability.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Thomas P. Reed, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofHuntington Preferred Capital, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) forthe registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; and b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize,and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004        /s/ Thomas P. Reed      Thomas P. Reed, Vice President   (chief financial officer)
26
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Glenn
      Welstad, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Command Center, Inc. (the
      "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
      knowledge:





This
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June
      27, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"),
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 13, 2008





/s/
                Glenn Welstad


Glenn
      Welstad


President
      and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2010221EN.01001301.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 June 2010 (References for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — Terre wallonne ASBL (C-105/09), Inter-Environnement Wallonie ASBL (C-110/09) v Région wallonne

(Joined Cases C-105/09 and C-110/09) (1)

1

(Directive 2001/42/EC - Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment - Directive 91/676/EEC - Protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources - Action programmes in respect of vulnerable zones)

2010/C 221/20

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Terre wallonne ASBL (C-105/09), Inter-Environnement Wallonie ASBL (C-110/09)

Applicants:

Defendant: Région wallonne

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Conseil d’État — Interpretation of Article 5(1) of Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (OJ 1991 L 375, p. 1) and Art 3(2) and (4) of Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (OJ 2001 L 197, p. 30) — Drawing up of management plans relating to designated vulnerable zones — Nature and scope of the obligation — Necessary assessment of the impact of the nitrogen management plan on the environment

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

An action programme adopted pursuant to Article 5(1) of Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources is in principle a plan or programme covered by Article 3(2)(a) of Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment since it constitutes a ‘plan’ or ‘programme’ within the meaning of Article 2(a) of the latter directive and contains measures compliance with which is a requirement for issue of the consent that may be granted for carrying out projects listed in Annexes I and II to Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, as amended by Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 06.06.2009.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6061]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. FINCHER:
        H.R. 6415.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8.
```
# Knott - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Hindman, KY: Overcoming Challenges and Upgrading Water Services  Using BIL funds, the City of Hindman was able to overcome cost barriers to critical water system upgrades. The post Hindman, KY: Overcoming Challenges and Upgrading Water Services  appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Kentucky River Community Care: Building Bridges to Long-Term Recovery At 39%&#160;participation,&#160;Eastern Kentucky&#160;has the lowest workforce participation rate among ages 18-24 in the nation.&#160;This area&#160;also&#160;finds itself&#160;at the epicenter of&#160;our nation’s substance abuse crisis, creating a unique challenge for both the health and economic capacity of communities.&#160;That&#8217;s why a number of organizations,&#160;like&#160;Kentucky River Community Care, Inc. (KRCC), work every day to overcome these&#160;obstacles.&#160;Now, with a $500,000 [&#8230;]The post Kentucky River Community Care: Building Bridges to Long-Term Recovery appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Kentucky River Area Development District Executive Director Michelle Allen Email &#x6d;&#x69;&#x63;&#x68;&#x65;&#x6c;&#x6c;&#x65;&#64;&#107;&#114;&#97;&#100;&#100;&#46;orgThe post Kentucky River Area Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28804]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Interest Rates

    The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called 
the Optional Peg Rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This rate 
is a weighted average cost of money to the Government for maturities 
similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be used as a base 
rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. This rate will 
be 4.88 percent for the January-March quarter of FY 2024.
    Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.921(b), the maximum legal interest rate for 
any Third Party Lender's commercial loan which funds any portion of the 
cost of a 504 project (see 13 CFR 120.801) shall be 6% over the Prime 
rate or, if that exceeds the maximum interest rate permitted by the 
constitution or laws of a given State, the maximum interest rate will 
be the rate permitted by the constitution or laws of the given State.

David Parrish,
Chief, Secondary Market Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-28804 Filed 12-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
#### NICHOLS v. STATE.

No. A-11824.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Nov. 25, 1953.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 6, 1954.

Geb, Fredericks & Moriarty, Ponca City, A. H. Huggins, Norman, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ned Looney, County Atty., Kay County, Ponca City, for defendant in error.

POWELL, Presiding Judge.

Clyde Adward Nichols was charged by information filed in the county court of Kay County with possession of intoxicating liquor, was tried before a jury, found guilty but the jury being unable to agree upon the amount of the punishment, left the same to the court, who thereafter (counsel for the State and the defense being present after written notice from the county attor*367ney) heard evidence from the court clerk of Kay County given from the records in his office of fourteen past offenses for which the defendant had been convicted. The court fixed defendant’s punishment at six months incarceration in the county jail of Kay county and to pay a fine of $500, and all costs of the action.

We have carefully read the exhaustive briefs and the record. The defendant did not testify. The evidence was overwhelming. We have given consideration to all the points raised by counsel for the defendant, but find no reversible error.

We shall not go into the evidence or argument of counsel. In order to attain and maintain a current docket a summary judgment is indicated. This expedient many years past was resorted to in misdemeanor cases. See Volumes 2, 3, 5 to 8, 16 to 18, Oklahoma Criminal Reports, and from time to time memorandum opinions in later volumes. See Casteel v. State, 25 Okl.Cr. 51, 218 P. 1111; Tucker v. State, 7 Okl.Cr. 634, 124 P. 1134, 125 P. 1089. The statutory authority was enacted in 1909, 'but the 1953 Legislature reaffirmed and added to the provisions. See Section 47 of Title 20 O.S., reading:

> “The Court of Criminal Appeals shall render a written opinion in all felony cases within six (6) months after said cases shall have been submitted for decision, and the Judge delivering the opinion shall prepare a syllabus of the points of law involved therein, in the same manner as provided for the Supreme Court. There shall be no less than four (4) extra copies of each opinion made and filed with the clerk, to be disposed of by him to any one applying therefor at One Dollar and Fifty Cents ($1.50) each, and said fee shall be accounted for and disposed of as are all fees collected by the clerk: Provided, that the Court may, when in its judgment public interest may be subserved, render a written opinion in like manner in misdemeanor cases. Provided, however, that in any case the opinion of the Court may be in such short form or memorandum form as to the questions of law and the facts involved as the Court deems proper, with or without detailed statement of the facts, all as the Court, in its discretion, may deem sufficient in that case.”

The judgment and sentence is affirmed

JONES and BRETT, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
        10.14**
 
 **GRAND
        HAVANA ENTERPRISES, INC.**
 **1990
        Westwood Boulevard, Penthouse**
 **Los
        Angeles, CA 90025**









September
      26, 2004











1990
      Westwood Boulevard, Inc.


1990
      Westwood Boulevard, Third Floor


Los
      Angeles, California 90025


Attention.:
      Harry Shuster








Dear
      Mr.
      Shuster:





When
      countersigned by you below, this letter will set forth our understanding and
      constitute our agreement as to the following:





As
      of
      September 26, 2004, Grand Havana Enterprises, Inc. (the “ Company ”)
      is
      indebted to 1990 Westwood Boulevard, Inc., a California corporation
      (“ 1990 ”)
      in the
      total amount of $170,865.58, which represents $166,055.00 in principal and
      $4,810.58 in unpaid interest accrued as of the date hereof, as a result of
      that
      certain Promissory Note, dated March 1, 2004, in the principal amount of
      $181,720 (the “ Outstanding
      Promissory Note ”).
      1990
      hereby acknowledges and agrees that the Outstanding Promissory Note is hereby
      cancelled and terminated effective as of the date hereof, without any further
      liability or obligations by the Company thereunder and, in consideration for
      such cancellation and termination, the Company will issue to 1990 a new,
      unsecured promissory note in the principal amount of $170,865.58.





This
      letter agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts by original or
      facsimile signature, each of which when so executed will be deemed to be an
      original, and all of which together will be deemed to constitute one and the
      same agreement.











If
      the
      foregoing is in accordance with your understanding, please so indicate by
      signing where provided below and returning one fully-signed copy hereof to
      us,
      whereupon this letter will constitute an agreement fully binding on the parties
      hereto in accordance with its terms under the laws of the State of
      California.




Very truly yours,GRAND
                HAVANA ENTERPRISES, INC.,
              a
                Delaware corporationBy:
            /s/
              Stanley ShusterName: Stanley ShusterTitle:
              President  AGREED
      AND ACCEPTED:





1990
      WESTWOOD BOULEVARD, INC.


a
      California corporation





By: /s/
      Harry Shuster


Name:  Harry
      Shuster


Title:  President







2
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 (the “Report”) of MCG Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Beverly Jane Alley, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:


|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/ BEVERLY JANE ALLEYName:Beverly Jane AlleyTitle:Chief Financial OfficerDateApril 29, 2015
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 455 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 

East Court Street in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ‘‘R. 

Jess Brown United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 455 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The United States courthouse located at 501 East 

3 Court Street in Jackson, Mississippi, shall be known and 

4 designated as the ‘‘R. Jess Brown United States Court5 house’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘R. Jess Brown United States 

11 Courthouse’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 25, 2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 455 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse located 

house’’. as the ‘‘R. Jess Brown United States Courtat 501 East Court Street in Jackson, Mississippi,