alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H5932-H5933]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         NO MORE SOLYNDRAS ACT

  (Mr. BOUSTANY asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. BOUSTANY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of the No More 
Solyndras Act. It ensures that taxpayers are never left on the hook for 
hundreds of millions of dollars for any future President's risky bets. 
This legislation phases out the Department of Energy's flawed loan 
guarantee program. It seeks to stop future debacles like the recent 
$535 million loan guarantee for the California solar panel manufacturer 
called Solyndra.

[[Page H5933]]

  This administration refuses to promote legitimate and safe domestic 
energy resources by issuing moratoriums in the Gulf of Mexico and 
needlessly delaying very important projects like the Keystone pipeline. 
Instead, it chooses to roll the dice on unproven technologies that 
result in bankruptcies with hundreds of millions of wasted taxpayer 
dollars. That's not a way to move forward.
  In south Louisiana, we know when it comes to energy production, 
domestic resources are waiting to be tapped safely, environmentally 
sound. Whether it's oil or natural gas or any other source, we must 
harness the resources of our land to create jobs here at home and to 
make sure that hardworking families aren't forced to feel the pain at 
the pump.

                          ____________________
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald Stubbs, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Ingrassia, J.), rendered February 10, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the People failed to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The credible evidence adduced at trial demonstrated that the defendant was one of two individuals who forceably robbed the complainant of his wallet. Several witnesses placed the defendant at the scene of the crime and the defendant’s own wallet, containing a photograph and identification papers, was found near the scene, apparently having been dropped by him during his flight. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

Equally without merit is the defendant’s contention that he was deprived of his right to counsel. While an indigent defen*188dant has a right to a court-appointed lawyer, he does not have the right to his choice of assigned counsel *(see, People v Sawyer,*57 NY2d 12). A defendant must show "[g]ood cause” before the court will substitute counsel *(People v Sawyer, supra,*at 19; *see, People v Medina,*44 NY2d 199; *People v Willis,*147 AD2d 727). Although the defendant contended that his assigned trial counsel should be relieved because he was an Assistant District Attorney in Orange County at the time the defendant was indicted, he failed to make the requisite showing that his assertion in this regard was true. Accordingly, as the defendant was not willing to proceed *pro se*and had no valid reason to support the assignment of new counsel, the court did not err in denying his application.

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Kunzeman, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                          AAMES FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                               Earnings Per Share
         For the Three Months September 30, 1998 and September 30, 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             Three Months Ended
                                                                               September 30,
                                                                               -------------
                                                                              1998               1997
                                                                           ----------        -----------
<S>                                                                        <C>               <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
          Net Income for calculating basic earnings per
              common share                                                 $  448,000        $13,081,000
                                                                           ==========        ===========

          Average common shares outstanding                                30,977,000         27,767,000
                                                                           ----------        -----------
                                    BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE             $0.01              $0.47


DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
          Net Income                                                         $448,000        $13,081,000
                                                                           ==========        ===========

          Adjust net income to add back the after-tax amount
                      of interest recognized in the period associated
                      with the convertible subordinated notes                       -            898,000
                                                                           ----------        -----------
                                                Adjusted net income        $  448,000        $13,979,000
                                                                           ==========        ===========

          Average common shares outstanding                                30,977,000         27,767,000

          Add exercise of options and warrants                                288,000          1,459,000
          Convertible subordinated notes                                            -          6,107,000
                                                                           ----------        -----------
                                         Diluted shares outstanding        31,265,000         35,333,000
                                                                           ==========        ===========
                                   DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE            $0.01              $0.40
                                                                           ==========        ===========
</TABLE>
# C_2008197EN.01003702.xml

| 2.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/37

---

Action brought on 9 June 2008 — Palazzo v Commission

(Case F-57/08)

(2008/C 197/72)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Armida Palazzo (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for, first, a declaration that Article 4 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities is illegal and, secondly, for annulment of the Appointing Authority's decision concerning the calculation of the credited contribution years of pension rights acquired by the applicant as a member of the local staff.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | Declare that Article 4 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities is illegal; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that Article 4 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities is illegal;

| — | Annul the Appointing Authority's decision 24 October 2007 concerning the calculation of the credited contribution years of the pension rights acquired by the applicant as a member of the local staff; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Appointing Authority's decision 24 October 2007 concerning the calculation of the credited contribution years of the pension rights acquired by the applicant as a member of the local staff;

| — | order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 248 (Thursday, December 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 89721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28680]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIDDK-Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: February 20, 2024.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 
7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Xiaodu Guo, Ph.D., M.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, 
National Institutes of Health, Room 7023, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-4719, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1176647e695174696563703f7f7875757a3f7f78793f767e67"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4c3d1cbdce4c1dcd0d6c58acacdc0c0cf8acacdcc8ac3cbd2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 22, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-28680 Filed 12-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40633 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAVIER ORTIZ-AROZENA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:01-CR-239-ALL

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender has moved for leave to withdraw from representation of Javier Ortiz-Arozena and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ortiz-Arozena has filed a response in which he challenges the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry, which was the violation resulting in the revocation of his supervised release. Ortiz does not challenge the validity of the revocation proceeding or the sentence imposed.No. 05-40633 -2- Our independent review of the brief, Ortiz-Arozena’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
<Page>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.5(b)

                    SONESTA INTERNATIONAL HOTELS CORPORATION
                                (the "Borrower")


             Fifth Allonge to $2,000,000 Commercial Promissory Note
                      dated September 29, 2000 (the "Note")


                                            Boston, Massachusetts
                                            December 31, 2004

     1.   Change to Demand Facility.

     As used in the Note, references to "Maturity," "at Maturity" and "at the
Maturity of the Note" are hereby amended to read "ON DEMAND."

     THIS ALLONGE IS MADE AND DELIVERED by the Borrower and shall be a part of
the Note. The Note referred to above, as amended hereby, is hereby reaffirmed by
the Borrower.

                                            SONESTA INTERNATIONAL
                                            HOTELS CORPORATION


                                            By: /S/
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Peter J. Sonnabend
                                                Vice Chairman

                                                                              64
# Sullivan - Appalachian Regional Commission

- First Tennessee Development District Executive Director Chris Craig &#160;Email &#x63;&#99;r&#x61;&#105;&#103;&#x40;&#x66;&#116;d&#x64;&#46;o&#x72;&#x67;The post First Tennessee Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1533]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  HONORING PASTOR MARQUES L. FLETCHER

                                 ______
                                 

                  HON. HENRY C. ``HANK'' JOHNSON, JR.

                               of georgia

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 14, 2012

  Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I submit the following 
proclamation.
  Whereas, Pastor Marques L. Fletcher is celebrating thirteen (13) 
years in ministry this year as Pastor of Young Street Community Baptist 
Church; and
  Whereas, Pastor Marques L. Fletcher, under the guidance of God has 
pioneered and sustained Young Street Community Baptist Church, as an 
instrument in our community that uplifts the spiritual, physical and 
mental welfare of our citizens; and
  Whereas, this remarkable and tenacious man of God has given hope to 
the hopeless, fed the hungry and is a beacon of light to those in need; 
and
  Whereas, Pastor Fletcher is a spiritual warrior, a man of compassion, 
a fearless leader and a servant to all, but most of all a visionary who 
has shared not only with his Church, but with our District and the 
world his passion to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ; and
  Whereas, the U.S. Representative of the Fourth District of Georgia 
has set aside this day to honor and recognize Pastor Marques L. 
Fletcher as he celebrates his thirteenth Pastoral Anniversary at Young 
Street Community Baptist Church;
  Now therefore, I, Henry C. ``Hank'' Johnson, Jr. do hereby proclaim 
September 16, 2012 as Pastor Marques L. Fletcher Day in the 4th 
Congressional District of Georgia.
  Proclaimed, this 16th day of September, 2012.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.0


                       [LETTERHEAD OF IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.]






                                                                  March 21, 2002



Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

         Re:      Representations of Arthur Andersen

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In accordance with Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, attached
please find a copy of the representation letter we have received from Arthur
Andersen. These representations were obtained in conjunction with Arthur
Andersen's consent filed today as Exhibit 23.1 to the Form 10-K of IPC Holdings,
Ltd.

                                                Yours faithfully,



                                                /s/ JOHN WEALE
                                                --------------------------------
                                                    J. R. Weale

                                                Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer

(Attachment)
<PAGE>
To the Board of Director and Shareholders of IPC Holdings, Ltd.:

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of IPC Holdings, Ltd. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended and have issued
our report thereon dated February 8, 2002. We represent that this audit was
subject to our quality control system for the accounting and audit practice to
provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance
with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Arthur
Andersen personnel working on the audit, availability of national office
consultation, and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur
Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

Very truly yours,



ARTHUR ANDERSEN
Hamilton, Bermuda
March 20, 2002
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 9:02 AM

To: 'xcamaerialsolutions@gmail.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Information: X- cam Aerial Solutions, Inc. (FAA-2015-0906)



### June 4, 2015

Dear Mr. Bond:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0906). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make, mode l, and type (i.e. - fixed-wing, ro torcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description shoul d include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by June 18, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Donald R. Kimble, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofHuntington Preferred Capital, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) forthe registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; and b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize,and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004        /s/ Donald R. Kimble      Donald R. Kimble, President   (chief executive officer)
25
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of  GRANT HAYWARD, INC., (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kevin Ericksteen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Kevin
Ericksteen


Kevin
Ericksteen


Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




Date: September
18, 2008