alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 249 (Friday, December 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 90218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28743]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 29, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 26, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 158 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-143, CP2024-149.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-28743 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# C_2008209EN.01006101.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/61

---

Action brought on 20 June 2008 — CBI and Abisp v Commission

(Case T-241/08)

(2008/C 209/109)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Coordination Bruxelloise d'Institutions sociales et de santé (CBI) (Brussels, Belgium) and Association Bruxelloise des Institutions de Soins Privées (Abisp) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: D. Waelbroeck and D. Slater, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the confirmatory decision of the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the confirmatory decision of the Commission;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants seek the annulment of the Commission's decision of 10 April 2008, which, in their opinion, confirms the Commission's decision of 10 January 2008 rejecting their complaint made on 7 September and 17 October 2005 against the State aid granted by the Kingdom of Belgium to public hospitals of the IRIS network in the Brussels-Capital Region and refusing to initiate the formal investigation procedure in respect of the aid in question pursuant to Article 88(2) EC.

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicants are identical to those submitted in Case T-128/08 CBI and Abisp v Commission
   (1).

CBI and Abisp

Commission

1

---

(1)  OJ 2008 C 142, p. 30.

1

---
Report of Independent Accountant



To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of GMAC Commercial Holding Corp.

We have examined management's assertion, dated March 13, 2002, about GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corp. and its subsidiaries' (the "Company") compliance with its established minimum servicing standards ("Servicing Policy) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001 included in the accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit 1). Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the Servicing Policy. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the Servicing Policy and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the Servicing Policy.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned Servicing Policy as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
PriceWaterhouseCooper; LLP
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York NY 10036
Telephone (646) 471 4000
Facsimile(646) 471 4100
March 13, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       4,890,358
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,019,089
<PP&E>                                         277,498
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,317,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          441,979
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       147,239
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,731,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,317,737
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,029
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,405,110
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             183,371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,452,158)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,325,844)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (126,314)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,452,158)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FILED
AS PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          51,057
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,189
<INVENTORY>                                    119,881
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               242,322
<PP&E>                                         246,597
<DEPRECIATION>                                 133,595
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 583,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          246,979
<BONDS>                                        274,706
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   583,885
<SALES>                                      1,064,235
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,064,235
<CGS>                                          364,090
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,011,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,071
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,295
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,960
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,335
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,335
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 423-424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28933]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


International Product Change--Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package 
International Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package 
International Service contract to the list of Negotiated Service 
Agreements in the Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification 
Schedule.

DATES: Date of notice: January 3, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-
7820.

[[Page 424]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 27, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail 
International & First-Class Package International Service Contract 33 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2024-145 and CP2024-151.

Sarah Sullivan,
Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023-28933 Filed 1-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5861]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

    CONGRESSIONAL EARMARKS, LIMITED TAX BENEFITS, OR LIMITED TARIFF 
                                BENEFITS

  Under clause 9 of rule XXI, lists or statements on congressional 
earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits were 
submitted as follows:

                    Offered By Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin

       The provisions that warranted a referral to the Committee 
     on the Budget in H.R. 6365, The National Security and Job 
     Protection Act of 2012, do not contain any congressional 
     earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits as 
     defined in clause 9 of rule XXI.
```
================================================================================




                                  Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Spirit,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.       The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934; and

2.       The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.



Date:  July 7, 2004

                                                 /s/ Peter Sotola
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 Peter Sotola
                                                 President, C.E.O. and Director
                                                 (Principal Executive Officer)
#### C. M. DUNCAN, Plaintiff in Error, v. Iva SIMS and Patsy Trammell, Defendants in Error.

No. 35877.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Nov. 23, 1954.

*146Brown, Brown & Brown, McAlester, for plaintiff in error.

Hill & Nix, McAlester, for defendants in error.

ARNOLD, Justice.

Plaintiffs leased certain land to defendant and after the defendant had taken possession of the leased premises plaintiffs enjoined the defendant from interfering with the watering of certain livestpck. Defendant has appealed from this judgment.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the possession of the premises had been surrendered and the question involved is moot. The court called for response to the motion to dismiss and in the response'filed it is admitted that the possession of defendant under the lease has ended. The motion to dismiss must be sustained. Injunctive relief alone was sought and no relief could be granted defendant since he is not entitled to possession.

In Harden v. Morris, 198 Okl. 398, 179 P.2d 144, it is stated:

> “When the question presented by an appeal has become moot, the appeal will be dismissed.”

It is stated in the response to the motion to dismiss that there is still to be ’ determined the question of who shall be charged with the costs of the appeal. This court has held that where the issues on appeal have become moot it will not retain jurisdiction for the purpose of determining who shall be charged with the' costs. Westgate Oil Co. v. Refiners Production Co., 172 Okl. 260, 44 P.2d 993; In re Protest Against Referendum Petition No. 5, Oklahoma City, 185 Okl. 393, 92 P.2d 374.

Appeal dismissed.
##### 



Exhibit 24

COLE NATIONAL GROUP, INC.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each of the undersigned officers and/or directors of Cole National Group,
a Delaware corporation (the Corporation), hereby constitutes and appoints
Lawrence Pollock, Lawrence Hyatt, Joseph Gaglioti, Ann Holt and Leslie Dunn,
and each of them, as the true and lawful attorney or attorneys-in-fact, with
full power of substitution and revocation, for the undersigned and in the name,
place and stead of the undersigned, to sign on behalf of the undersigned an
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, pursuant
to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and to sign any and all
amendments to such Annual Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, and each
of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to
all intents and purposes as they might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorney or attorneys-in-fact or any of them or
their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands as of
the 1st day of April, 2004.

/s/ Jeffrey A. Cole
    
    /s/ Larry PollockJeffrey A. Cole, Director
    
    Lawrence Pollock, Director andPrincipal Executive Officer/s Timothy F. Finley
    
    /s/ Irwin N. GoldTimothy F. Finley, Director
    
    Irwin N. Gold, Director/s/ Charles A. Ratner
    
    /s/ Peter V. HandalCharles A. Ratner, Director
    
    Peter V. Handal, Director/s/ Ronald E. Eilers
    
    /s/ Walter J. SalmonRonald E. Eilers, Director
    
    Walter J. Salmon, Director/s/ Lawrence E. Hyatt
    
    /s/ Ann M. HoltLawrence E. Hyatt, Principal
Financial Officer
    
    Ann Holt, Principal
Accounting Officer
### S
. C
. DH E C A v ena l C o mm en t s : D o ck e t # EPA
- R 09
- O A R
- 2009
- 0438 A l an Han c o ck t

o: R9 A i rP e rm i t

s , S h i rl e y R i v e ra 04 / 12/ 2011 11 : 03 AM C c: r c o r e y , " E li z abe t

h B a s il " , " J a m e sL i tt

l e " , " M y r a C
. R ee c e " , "R enee S hea l y " , "R honda B an ks T ho m p s on " , B e v e rl y B an i s t e r, G e r a r do R i o s , G r egg W o rl e y , D a v e . W a rner H i s t o r y: T h i s m e ss age ha sbeen f o r w a r ded. 

### 1 a tt a c h m ent
S CDH E C

_

A v ena l

_ C o mm en t

s_ 20110412
. pdf 20110412


### Ms. Rivera, Please find attached comments from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) Bureau of Air Quality on the March 2011 Supplemental Statement of Basis for the Avenal Energy Project. Thank you.

Alan M . Hancock Regulation and SIP Management Section Bureau of Air Quality SC DHEC 2600 Bull St Columbia, SC 29201 ph: (803) 898-4139 fax: (803) 898-4117 hancocam@dhec.sc.gov
# C_2008128EN.01002103.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/21

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāta (Republic of Lativa) lodged on 28 February 2008 — Schenker SIA v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

(Case C-93/08)

(2008/C 128/37)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākās tiesas Senāts

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Schenker SIA

Applicant:

Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Defendant:

Question referred

Must Article 11 of Regulation No 1383/2003 (1) be interpreted as precluding the possibility of imposing a penalty on the declarant or owner of goods under the national law, where the intellectual property right-holder (the right-holder) reaches an agreement, with the declarant or the owner of those goods, to abandon them for their destruction, or engages in discussions in respect of the possibility of the goods being abandoned for their destruction, and in the course of that procedure, the customs authorities receive information that the goods are counterfeit?

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1383/2003 of 22 July 2003 concerning customs action against goods suspected of infringing certain intellectual property rights and the measures to be taken against goods found to have infringed such rights (OJ 2003 L 196, p. 7).

1

---
Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2005–2009

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

A college completion rate is the percentage of persons ages 25 

and over with a bachelor’s degree or more. The percent of the 

U.S. average is computed by dividing the county college 

completion rate by the national average and multiplying by 100. 

The map uses critical breaks such as the national average to 

organize the data into groups of common values.

Map Created: October 2013

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2005–2009

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

16.6% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.9% 

100.0% - 176.9%

Percent of the U.S. Average 

(Critical Breaks Classification) 

U.S. average = 27.5%

Appalachian average = 20.4%
EXHIBIT 21
 SUBSIDIARIES OF ULTRATECH, INC.
  Subsidiaries
    
    Jurisdiction of incorporationUltratech CH
    
    KoreaUltratech International, Inc.
    
    State of Delaware, USAUltratech GmbH
    
    GermanyUltra-Tech Technologies Israel Ltd.
    
    IsraelUltratech Kabushiki Kaisha
    
    JapanUltratech Stepper East, Inc.
    
    State of Delaware, USASurtek, Inc.
    
    State of New York, USAUltratech Stepper (Thailand) Co. Ltd.
    
    ThailandUltratech (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaUltratech (Singapore) Pte, Ltd.
    
    SingaporeUltratech Corporation
    
    State of Nevada, USA
#### People, Respondent, v Mark Toporczyk, Appellant.—

Motion to extend stay of execution of judgment of conviction granted upon condition that appellant’s briefs are filed and served on or before August 26, 1991. Memorandum: It is not the practice of this Court to hold appeals from a judgment of conviction awaiting the outcome of a CPL article 440 motion. The appeal, therefore, must be perfected on or before August 26, 1991, or the stay will expire. Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ. (Order entered July 2, 1991.)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6014]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           SIGNING AUTHORITY

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that from Thursday, 
August 2, to Monday, September 10, the majority leader and Senators 
Webb, Reed of Rhode Island, Conrad, and Cardin be authorized to sign 
duly enrolled bills or joint resolutions.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1488-E1489]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       IN HONOR OF JULIAN ROGERS

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 12, 2012

  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in honor of Julian Rogers, a 
member of the Cuyahoga County Council serving the Tenth District.
  Councilman Rogers was elected to the Cuyahoga County Council in 2010 
and currently chairs the Environment and Sustainability Committee. He 
is also the current Executive Director of Education Voters Ohio, a 
statewide, nonprofit organization that works to improve the quality of 
public education throughout Ohio.
  Prior to serving the residents of Cuyahoga County, Councilman Rogers 
worked as the senior assistant to the Chief Executive Officer at the 
Cleveland Municipal School District (CMSD) for a span of seven years. 
During that time, he also served as a Liaison to the Office of the 
Mayor for five years. Preceding his work with the CMSD and City of 
Cleveland, Rogers worked on Mary Boyle's campaign for the U.S. Senate, 
as a Regional Director for America Coming Together, served as a 
delegate to the 2004 Democratic National Convention, co-founded Blue 88 
and served as Field Director for the Cuyahoga County Arts and Culture 
levy which helps provide over $16 million a year to support arts and 
culture in the community. Additionally he has been appointed to the 
Board of Trustees of the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority 
in 2006 and 2009,

[[Page E1489]]

and has served as a Program Associate for Public Policy and Research 
for the Community Partnership for Arts and Culture.
  Councilman Rogers is the recipient of several awards and honors 
including the Emerging Leader Award bestowed upon him by Congresswoman 
Stephanie Tubbs-Jones and the U.S. Congressional Black Caucus in 2006 
and Congresswoman Marcia Fudge in 2009.
  Mr. Speaker and colleagues, please join me in honoring Julian Rogers, 
a dedicated member of the Cuyahoga County Council.

                          ____________________
```