alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 April 2009 – Commission v Greece**

**(Case C-493/08)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2005/56/EC – Cross-border mergers of limited liability companies – Failure to transpose within the prescribed period

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 8)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross‐border mergers of limited liability companies (OJ 2005 L 310, p. 1). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 19 of that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
<PAGE>   1
                         PAIRGAIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                EXHIBIT 23.2 -- INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of PairGain Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 Nos.
33-72792 and 33-96080 of our report dated January 23, 1996, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of PairGain Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries for
the year ended December 31, 1995.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Costa Mesa, California
March 27, 1996




                                     E-2
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 5 (Monday, January 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[Application No. 05-2A001]


Export Trade Certificate of Review

ACTION: Notice of relinquishment of the Export Trade Certificate of 
Review for Central America Poultry Export Quota, Inc. (``CA-PEQ''), 
Application No. 05-2A001.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of Commerce, through the Office of Trade and 
Economic Analysis (``OTEA'') of the International Trade Administration, 
has received notice of the relinquishing of an Export Trade Certificate 
of Review (``Certificate'').

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Flynn, Director, OTEA, 
International Trade Administration, (202) 482-5131 (this is not a toll-
free number) or email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#086d7c6b69487c7a696c6d266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="066372656746727467626328616970">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of the Export Trading Company Act 
of 1982 (15 U.S.C. 4011-21) authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to 
issue Export Trade Certificates of Review. An Export Trade Certificate 
of Review protects the holder and the members identified in the 
Certificate from State and Federal government antitrust actions and 
from private treble damage antitrust actions for the export conduct 
specified in the Certificate and carried out in compliance with its 
terms and conditions. The regulations implementing Title III are found 
at 15 CFR part 325. Pursuant to 15 CFR 325.15, a Certificate holder may 
relinquish a Certificate at any time through written notice to the 
Secretary. The Certificate will cease to be effective on the day the 
Secretary receives the notice.

Summary of Action

    On December 5, 2023, CA-PEQ relinquished its Certificate 
(Application No. 05-2A001) pursuant to 15 CFR 325.15. This publication 
serves as public notice that the Certificate was relinquished and 
ceased to be effective on December 5, 2023.

    Dated: January 3, 2024.
Joseph Flynn,
Director, Office of Trade and Economic Analysis, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2024-00140 Filed 1-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2008183EN.01002301.xml

| 19.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/23

---

Appeal brought on 5 May 2008 by the Commission of the European Communities against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 21 February 2008 in Case F-31/07, Putterie-De-Beukelaer v Commission

Putterie-De-Beukelaer

Commission

(Case T-160/08 P)

(2008/C 183/45)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Françoise Putterie-De-Beukelaer (Brussels, Belgium)

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

| — | set aside the judgement under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgement under appeal;

| — | refer the case back to the CST; |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the CST;

| — | reserve the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

reserve the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By this appeal, the Commission requests that the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (CST) of 21 February 2008 in Case F-31/07 Putterie-De-Beukelaer v Commission, in which the CST annulled Ms Putterie-De-Beukelaer's Career Development Report concerning the period from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2005, be set aside in so far as that report does not acknowledge her potential to carry out duties in category B*.

Putterie-De-Beukelaer

Commission

In support of its appeal, the Commission relies on a single plea in law, alleging, first, infringement by the CST of the principles relating to the scope of the review exercised by the Community judicature of its own motion and, second, infringement of the prohibition on adjudicating ultra petita.

ultra petita

The Commission submits that the CST was not entitled to raise of its own motion a plea concerning the substantive legality of the contested act alleging infringement of the respective scope of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and Article 10(3) of Annex XIII to those regulations, since substantive pleas are not an absolute bar to proceeding with an action.

In the alternative, the Commission claims that, in so far as paragraphs 75 and 76 of the judgment under appeal could be considered separable from the plea alleging the substantive legality of the contested measure and be categorised as a separate plea alleging that the author of the contested act exceeded its power, the CST infringed the Commission's rights of defence, since the latter was not heard on that point in accordance with Article 77 of the Rules of Procedure of the CST.

---
Third Amendment to Separation Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3(c) 
  
 Gary M. Spitz 
  
 225 Warrenton Drive 
 Houston, Texas
77024 
  
 October 11, 2004 
  
 VIA HAND DELIVERY 
  
 KRATON Polymers LLC 
 700 Milam Street,

 13th Floor, North
Tower 
 Houston, TX 77002 

			
	 Attention:
	  	George Gregory
	 	  	President & Chief Executive Officer

  
 Dear George; 
  
 Pursuant to paragraph 1 of the Separation Agreement dated April 26, 2004 (the
“Separation Agreement”), as amended pursuant to the Letter Agreements dated June 8, 2004, July 20, 2004 and August 30, 2004 (the “Amendments”) (collectively, the Separation Agreement and the Amendments shall be referred to as the
“Agreement”), I hereby give forty-five (45) days written notice of my intent to terminate my employment with the Company pursuant to the terms of such Agreement. 
  
 Accordingly, my Separation Date from the Company will be November 24, 2004 and as of such date I will resign from all positions as an
employee and officer of the Company and all other direct and indirect subsidiaries and affiliates of the Company. 
  
 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged. 
  

	
	 Sincerely;

	
	/s/     GARY M. SPITZ        
	Gary M. Spitz


			
		
	 cc:
	 	 Joseph J. Waiter
 General Counsel
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Bancshares California (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel L. Erickson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: November 14, 2006
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6289]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              APPOINTMENT OF ACTING PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will please read a communication to 
the Senate from the President pro tempore (Mr. Inouye).
  The legislative clerk read the following letter:

                                                      U.S. Senate,

                                        President pro tempore,

                               Washington, DC, September 13, 2012.
     To the Senate:
       Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, of the 
     Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby appoint the Honorable 
     Tom Udall, a Senator from the State of New Mexico, to perform 
     the duties of the Chair.
                                                 Daniel K. Inouye,
                                            President pro tempore.

  Mr. UDALL thereupon assumed the chair as Acting President pro 
tempore.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32.3

Certification of Chief Accounting Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010(the Report) of MCG Capital
Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Linda A. Nimmons, the Chief Accounting Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ LINDA A. NIMMONSName:

Linda A. NimmonsTitle:

Chief Accounting OfficerDate

August 5, 2010
# Cabell - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Region 2–Planning and Development Council Executive Director Chris Chiles Email cchi&#108;&#101;&#115;&#64;&#114;&#101;&#103;&#x69;&#x6f;&#x6e;&#x32;&#x70;&#x64;&#x63;&#x2e;&#x6f;rgThe post Region 2–Planning and Development Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# Yadkin - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Piedmont Triad Regional Council Executive Director Matthew L. Dolge Email mdo&#108;&#103;&#101;&#x40;&#x70;&#x74;&#x72;&#x63;&#x2e;orgThe post Piedmont Triad Regional Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
EXHIBIT 32


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Paul G. Laird, Chief Executive Officer and I, Les Bates, Chief Financial
Officer of New Frontier Energy, Inc. (the "Company") certify that:

     1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of New Frontier
Energy, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report; and

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report.

Date:    July 13, 2006



/s/ Paul G. Laird
-----------------------
Paul G. Laird,
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Les Bates
-----------------------
Les Bates,
Chief Financial Officer
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:AD 93-07-15
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 4.48

Daniel S. Clevenger, Esq.
Markland Technologies, Inc.

March 29, 2005

via E-mail and First Class mail

Warrant Holder

Re: Warrant Exercise Price adjustment

Dear Mr. []:

Reference is made to that certain warrant No. CS -[] to purchase [] shares of
the Common Stock of Markland Technologies, Inc. ("Markland" or the "Company"),
and dated [], 2005 (the "Warrant"). In accord with the understanding reached
between you, the Warrant holder, and the Company, the exercise price of the
Warrant is hereby reduced to $0.34 per share. All other terms of the Warrant
shall remain the same and in full force and effect. If you have any questions or
concerns regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.


                            Very Truly Yours,


                            Daniel S. Clevenger, Esq.
                            General Counsel
                            Markland Technologies, Inc.

                                      II-20

<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 06/06-0356]

Notice is hereby given that Independent Bankers Capital Fund IV, L.P., 5949 Sherry Lane, Suite 1472, Dallas, TX 75225, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under section 312 of the Act and section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflict of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Independent Bankers Capital Fund IV, L.P. (“IBCF IV”) is proposing to provide financing to Central States Bus Sales, Inc. (“Company”) to support the Company's growth.

The proposed transaction is brought within the purview of § 107.730 of the Regulations because Diamond State Ventures II, L.P. (“DSV”), an Associate of IBCF IV as defined in § 107.50, holds a 25% of equity interest in the Company. By virtue of DSV's equity ownership, the Company and IBCF IV are also Associates. DSV expects to receive $8.122 million from the proposed transaction.

                    Therefore, the proposed transaction requires a regulatory exemption pursuant to 13 CFR 107.730. Notice is hereby given that any interested person                           ( print page 824)                        may submit written comments on the transaction within fifteen days of the date of this publication to Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416.                

Bailey DeVries,

Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small Business Administration.

[FR Doc. 2024-00013 Filed 1-4-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### In the Matter of Makuna Mtambuzi, Petitioner, v Thomas A. Coughlin III, as Commissioner of Correctional *972Services, et al, Respondents.

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Contrary to petitioner’s contention, his disciplinary hearing was commenced within seven days of his restrictive confinement as required by 7 NYCRR 251-5.1 (a) *(see, Matter of Afrika v Edwards,*160 AD2d 1212). Furthermore, prior to the hearing, an extension was timely requested and granted *(see, Matter of Agosto v Coughlin,*153 AD2d 1008). The Hearing Officer's decision was also supported by substantial evidence. The misbehavior report was written by the correction officer who was the victim of the assault, it set forth the details of the incident with enough specificity, it was written on the day of the incident and was signed by the correction officer. As such, the report alone constituted sufficient evidence *(see, Matter of Bernacet v Coughlin,*145 AD2d 802, *lv denied*74 NY2d 603). As to any conflicting testimony presented by petitioner and his witnesses, this merely presented questions of credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see, Matter of Hernandez v LeFevre,*150 AD2d 954, *lv denied*74 NY2d 615). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and reject them as lacking in merit.

Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Levine and Crew III, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-20261 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN ANTONIO ESCOBAR Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CR-89-2 Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Juan Antonio Escobar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Escobar has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Escobar’s responsedi scloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D August 20, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-20261

2 D ISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. Escobar’s motion for the appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.
No. 07-16-00355-CV

Maria Ramos

 Appellant

v.

Ann Marie Castaneda

 Appellee 

§

§

§

§

From the County Court 

 of Deaf Smith County

April 28, 2017

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated April 28, 2017, it is ordered, adjudged 

and decreed that this appeal be dismissed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that 

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 8, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129839 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129839 

 COA: 255637 
 Wayne CC: 04-000886-02 

TERESE KEGLER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 15, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal. 

d0301 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 8, 2006 

Clerk
# C_2012080EN.01001501.xml

| 17.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — EI du Pont de Nemours and Others v Commission

(Case T-76/08) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for chloroprene rubber - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Price-fixing - Market-sharing - Imputability of the unlawful conduct - Joint venture - Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Mitigating circumstances - Cooperation)

2012/C 80/21

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: EI du Pont de Nemours and Company (Wilmington, Delaware, United States); DuPont Performance Elastomers LLC (Wilmington); and DuPont Performance Elastomers SA (Grand-Saconnex, Switzerland) (represented by: J. Boyce and A. Lyle-Smythe, Solicitors)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by X. Lewis and V. Bottka, subsequently by V. Bottka and V. Di Bucci, and lastly by V. Bottka, S. Noë and A. Biolan, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION for, first, annulment of Articles 1 and 2 of Commission Decision C(2007) 5910 final of 5 December 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.629 — Chloroprene Rubber), as amended by Commission Decision C(2008) 2974 final of 23 June 2008, in that they refer to EI du Pont de Nemours and Company and, second, a reduction in the amount of the fine imposed jointly and severally on the applicants by that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders EI du Pont de Nemours and Company, DuPont Performance Elastomers LLC and DuPont Performance Elastomers SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EI du Pont de Nemours and Company, DuPont Performance Elastomers LLC and DuPont Performance Elastomers SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 116, 9.5.2008.

1

---