alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1538]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  A TRIBUTE TO THE 132ND FIGHTER WING

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. TOM LATHAM

                                of iowa

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 14, 2012

  Mr. LATHAM. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to call attention to the 
outstanding work being done every day in Des Moines, Iowa by members of 
the 132nd Fighter Wing of the Iowa Air National Guard.
   As we are well aware, the U.S. Air Force has recently proposed a 
reduction of hundreds of Iowa Air Guard positions and the retirement of 
the Wing's F-16 aircraft, included in cuts to the Air National Guard 
nationwide. In the face of this uncertainty, the fine men and women 
that make up the 132nd Fighter Wing have done what Iowans do best--let 
their work ethic speak for itself. I am honored to congratulate them on 
the four major national level awards they have attained in the last six 
months alone. The awards include the NGAUS Distinguished Flying Unit, 
Major General John J. Pesch Flight Safety Trophy, Maintenance 
Effectiveness Award in the Medium Category, and the ARC Logistics 
Activity of the Year Award. These awards affirm the 132nd as the Top 
Logistics Readiness Squadron and Top Maintenance organization in the 
entire Air National Guard.
   Yesterday, this House passed H.J. Resolution 117 with my support 
which contained a crucial provision that places a moratorium on the 
proposed retirement of the 132nd Fighter Wing's F-16s, along with other 
proposed aircraft retirements from the Air National Guard. I do not 
believe that the Air Force's recommendation to close this fighter wing 
was based on thorough cost-benefit analysis. I will continue working to 
ensure that defense spending decisions are based on solid data and 
strengthening our national security, and working to fight for the 
permanent protection the members of the 132nd Fighter Wing deserve.
   Mr. Speaker, the men and women that comprise the nationally 
acclaimed 132nd Fighter Wing in Des Moines are some of the most 
experienced in the Air Force. They are crucial contributors to our 
nation's security, both at home and abroad, and this body is wise for 
standing with them and pressing for more accountable decision making by 
the Pentagon. I ask my colleagues in the House to join me in 
congratulating the Iowa Air Guard on their recent achievements as we 
look forward to many more to come. May God continue to watch over all 
of our soldiers, and their families, across the world and here at home.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1535]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         HONORING SUSAN BRADLEY

                                 ______
                                 

                  HON. HENRY C. ``HANK'' JOHNSON, JR.

                               of georgia

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 14, 2012

  Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I submit the following 
Proclamation.
  Whereas, Forty years ago a virtuous woman of God accepted her calling 
to serve in the Federal Government at the Centers for Disease Control; 
and
  Whereas, Ms. Susan Bradley began her career with the CDC with a 
willingness to lead and a passion to serve. Today she retires after 
providing exemplary service to the CDC and our community, and
  Whereas, this phenomenal woman has shared her time and talents, 
giving the citizens of our district a friend to help those in need, a 
fearless leader and a servant to all wanting to ensure that the system 
works for everyone; and
  Whereas, Ms. Susan Bradley is a cornerstone in our community that has 
enhanced the lives of thousands for the betterment of our District and 
Nation; and
  Whereas, the U.S. Representative of the Fourth District of Georgia 
has set aside this day to honor and recognize Ms. Susan Bradley on her 
retirement from the CDC and to wish her well in her new endeavors;
  Now Therefore, I, Henry C. ``Hank'' Johnson, Jr. do hereby proclaim 
August 30, 2012 as Ms. Susan Bradley Day In the 4th Congressional 
District of Georgia.
  Proclaimed, This 30th day of August, 2012.

                          ____________________
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 09, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 09, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0229. IN THE INTEREST OF: W. R., J. R., H. R. AND A. R., CHILDREN (MOTHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 09112DF
<Page>

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to Registration
Statement No. 033-63935 of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable
Account D on Form N-4, of our report dated February 24, 2005, relating to the
statements of assets and liabilities of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company
Variable Account D as of December 31, 2004, and the related statements of
operations for the year then ended and the statements of changes in net
assets for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2004,
appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is part of such
Registration Statement.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
April 4, 2005
# Montgomery - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Gateway Area Development District Executive Director Joshua Farrow Email &#x6a;&#111;s&#x68;&#117;a&#x2e;&#x66;&#97;&#x72;&#x72;&#111;w&#x40;&#107;y&#x2e;&#x67;&#111;&#x76;The post Gateway Area Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
****

**Exhibit A**

 

**Schedule of Advances**

 

|   |  

**Date**    | **Amount of**

**Advance**                |   |
|--------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | October 7, 2005     | $    400,000.00  |   |
|   | November 4, 2005    | 700,000.00                           |   |
|   | January 24, 2006    | 250,000.00                           |   |
|   | February 2, 2006    | 625,000.00                           |   |
|   | February 8, 2006    | 750,000.00                           |   |
|   | February 22, 2006   | 865,000.00                           |   |
|   | March 8, 2006       | 1,015,000.00                         |   |
|   | March 22, 2006      | 766,834.56                           |   |
|   | March 23, 2006      | 123,165.44                           |   |
|   | April 12, 2006      | 415,000.00                           |   |
|   | May 4, 2006         | 940,000.00                           |   |
|   | May 23, 2006        | 835,000.00                           |   |
|   | June 21,2006        | 655,000.00                           |   |
|   | July 3, 2006        | 660,000.00                           |   |
|   | July 26, 2006       | 600,000.00                           |   |
|   | August 14, 2006     | 675,000.00                           |   |
|   | August 28, 2006     | 530,000.00                           |   |
|   | September 29, 2006* | (2,800,000.00)                            |   |
|   | October 2, 2006     | 965,000.00                           |   |
|   | October 4, 2006     | 129,000.00                           |   |
|   | October 18, 2006    | 717,000.00                           |   |
|   | November 9, 2006    | 729,000.00                           |   |
|   | November 27, 2006   | 400,000.00                           |   |
|   | Total               | $10,945,000.00                       |   |
|   |                |                                      |   |

 

_______________

*To reflect the conversion of $2,800,000 of the previous advances to equity in Beard Pinnacle, LLC.

 

 

 

| (Exhibit A as amended effective November 27, 2006) | /s/HMJr    |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------|
|                                               | (Initials) |
# C_2008183EN.01002401.xml

| 19.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/24

---

Action brought on 13 May 2008 — DEI v Commission

(Case T-169/08)

(2008/C 183/47)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Dimosia Epikhirisi Ilektrismou A.E. (Athens, Greece) (represented by: P. Anestis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By this action, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 824 final of 5 March 2008 relating to the grant or retention in force by the Hellenic Republic of rights for the mining of lignite in favour of Dimosia Epikhirisi Ilektrismou (Public Power Corporation).

The applicant puts forward the following pleas for annulment.

The applicant submits, first, that the defendant erred in law when applying Article 86(1) EC in conjunction with Article 82 EC, and made a manifest error of assessment.

Specifically, according to the applicant the defendant erred (i) with regard to the definition of the relevant markets; (ii) with regard to application of the theory of extension of a dominant position, since it did not take into account that, even in the case of public undertakings, the extension must be based on State measures that grant exclusive or special rights; (iii) because the Greek legislation on the basis of which the applicant acquired rights in respect of the exploitation of lignite does not lead to a situation of unequal opportunity to the detriment of competitors; (iv) since the aforementioned legislation does not lead to the maintenance or strengthening of the applicant's dominant position in the wholesale electricity market; and (v) by reason of a manifest error of assessment in not taking into account the recent developments in the Greek electrical energy market inasmuch as they were important for proving the absence of an infringement.

Under the second plea for annulment, the applicant submits that, in issuing the contested decision, the defendant did not comply with the rules laid down by Article 253 EC that govern the statement of reasons.

Under the third plea for annulment, the applicant submits that the contested decision infringes the general principles of legal certainty, of the protection of legitimate expectations and of the protection of property. The applicant further contends that it falls to the Court to rule whether the defendant misused its powers.

Finally, under the fourth plea for annulment, the applicant submits that the defendant did not comply with the principle of proportionality as regards the corrective measures proposed by the contested decision.

---
#### *DIXON*BROTHERS LUMBER & SUPPLY and Franklin Insurance Company, a Corporation, Petitioners, *v.*Grover WATSON and State Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 36771.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

March 15, 1955.

Covington & Donovan, Tulsa, for petitioners.

Howard Trigg, Frank Grayson, Oklahoma City, Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondents.

WELCH, Justice.

On the 12th day of November, 1954, the State Industrial Commission, by trial commissioner, entered an order denying claimant an award finding that he was not an employee of respondent. The matter was appealed to the Commission en banc on December 9, 1954. The State Industrial Commission entered an order which is in part as follows:

> “It is therefore ordered, That the order of the trial commissioner heretofore entered in this case on November 12th, 1954, be and the same is hereby reversed, and finds that claimant, Grover Watson, was an employee of Dixon Brothers Lumber and Supply Company on March 20th, 1954, and that said cause be remanded to the trial commissioner for further proceedings and that said order as modified be adopted and made the order of this Commission En Banc.”

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that this order was not a final order under the provisions of 85 O.S.1951 § 29. The motion to dismiss must be sustained. This court has repeatedly held that an order of the trial court which vacates a former order or award and holds the same in abeyance until the final determination of the State Industrial Commission is not such an order as can be brought to this court prior to the order making or denying the award. Nelson v. Carter Oil *183Co., 191 Okl. 388, 130 P.2d 289; Kansas Explorations v. Blaine, 195 Okl. 428, 158 P.2d 907; Armour & Co. v. Moore, 206 Okl. 72, 240 P.2d 1113, and Anchor Stone & Materials Co. v. Terry, 207 Okl. 690, 252 P.2d 443.

The proceeding to review the order is dismissed.

JOHNSON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and CORN, HALLEY, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.
----

| **Exhibit 32.2**                              |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                          |
| **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**                 |
|                                          |
| 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350                        |
| AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                        |
| SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 |

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tari Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

| 1.      | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |
| 2.      | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                   |

 

Date: March 7, 2008

|        | /s/ Theodore Tsagkaris            |
|--------|-----------------------------------|
|        |                              |
|        | ------------------------------    |
|        | Theodore Tsagkaris                |
|   | Secretary, Treasurer & C.F.O. |
|        | (Principal Financial Officer and  |
|        | Principal Accounting Officer)     |

  

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      46,454,129
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  149,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,931,125
<PP&E>                                         633,608
<DEPRECIATION>                               (218,785)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,361,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,818,973
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,000,000
<COMMON>                                    98,696,741
<OTHER-SE>                                (59,394,840)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,361,906
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               337,254
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,564,335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,295,537)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,295,537)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.70)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of UNITECH ENERGY CORP. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2004, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, James  Durward,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/ James Durward
                                                  ---------------------------
Date: March 28, 2005                                  James Durward
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
# C_2009032EN.01004301.xml

| 7.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/43

---

Action brought on 14 November 2008 — Ryanair/Commission

(Case T-499/08)

(2009/C 32/83)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ryanair Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, I. Metaxas-Maragkidis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare in accordance with Articles 230 and 231 EC that the Commission's implied decision refusing access to the documents for which access was requested by the applicant in an application dated 25 June 2008 is void and that the Commission's decision of 23 October 2008 refusing access to the same documents is non-existent; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare in accordance with Articles 230 and 231 EC that the Commission's implied decision refusing access to the documents for which access was requested by the applicant in an application dated 25 June 2008 is void and that the Commission's decision of 23 October 2008 refusing access to the same documents is non-existent;

| — | alternatively, declare in accordance with Articles 230 and 231 EC that the Commission's decision of 23 October 2008 refusing access to the documents for which access was requested by the applicant in an application dated 25 June 2008 is void; |
| --- | --- |

—

alternatively, declare in accordance with Articles 230 and 231 EC that the Commission's decision of 23 October 2008 refusing access to the documents for which access was requested by the applicant in an application dated 25 June 2008 is void;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings; and |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings; and

| — | take such further action as the Court may deem appropriate. |
| --- | --- |

—

take such further action as the Court may deem appropriate.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By means of this application the applicant seeks annulment of the Commission implied decision rejecting the applicant's request, pursuant to Regulation No 1049/2001 (1), of the access to documents relating to State aid procedures concerning the presumed State aid granted through an agreement with the operator of Pau airport. The said decision was followed by the express decision of 23 October 2008. The annulment of the express decision is alternatively sought by the applicant in the present case.

1

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicant are identical to those relied on in Case T-494/08 Ryanair v Commission.

Ryanair

Commission

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000909992
<NAME> THE BEARD COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             375
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2476
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (71)
<INVENTORY>                                       2003
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5298
<PP&E>                                           16793
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (8094)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   16473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3553
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             1200
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                        8656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     16473
<SALES>                                          13608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 16683
<CGS>                                             9478
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    17585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1452)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   431
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (140)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (140)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (175)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (315)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>