alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
        32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. §1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
        ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of IVI Communications, Inc., (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        "Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
        as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1) The
        Report fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of
        1934; and
 
 (2) The
        information contained in
        the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
                  November 19, 2007
              
              /s/ Charles
                RoodenburgCharles
                  Roodenburg
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
                Chief
                  Financial
                  Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 2862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2009-31042]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2009-0986;
FRL-9098-3]

 Public Comment on Candidate National Enforcement and Compliance 
Assurance Priorities for Fiscal Years 2011-2013

Correction

    In notice document E9-31042 beginning on page 146 in the issue of 
Monday, January 4, 2010 make the following corrections:
    On page 147, in the first column, under the ``DATES:'' section, in 
the second line, `` January 19, 2009'' should read ``January 19, 
2010''.

[FR Doc. C1-2009-31042 Filed 1-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 23

- 00081

- CV

TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC , Appellant

v.

VERIZON WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS LP , Appellee

From the 170th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023

- 368

- 4

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 15, 2023, appellant, Traxcell Technologies, LLC, filed its notice of appeal

in this matter. Aft er the filing of its brief, Traxcell filed a “Notice of Suggestion of
Bankruptcy for Traxcell Technologies, LLC and Automatic Stay of Proceedings.”

Attached to the notice is Traxcell ’s bankruptcy petition that was filed on September 19,

2023, in the Unite d States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas. The noticeTraxcell Techs

. , LLC v. Verizon Wireless Pers

. Comm ’cns LP Page 2

and attached documents provide all the pertinent information required by Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 8.1. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.1. Given the above, further action in this
appeal is automatically stayed. See 11 U.S.C. § 362.
For administrative purposes, this appeal is suspended and will be treated as closed
unless reinstated on a proper motion. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.2. This appeal may be reinstated
on the motion of any party showing that the stay has been lifted or modified and
specifying what action, if any, is required from this Court upon reinstatement of the
appeal. Id. at 8.3.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to transmit a copy of this opinion to the
attorneys of record, the trial court judge, and the trial court clerk.

STEVE SMITH Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Appeal suspended; administratively closed Opinion delivered and filed October 1 9 , 2023 [CV06]
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 11 June 2009 – Baldesberger v OHIM (Shape of tweezers)**

**(Case T-78/08)**

(Community trade mark – Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark – Shape of tweezers – Absolute ground for
refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC)
No 207/2009))

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of any distinctive character (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 25, 28-30)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 December 2007 (Case R 1405/2007-4) regarding an application for registration of a three-dimensional sign in the shape of tweezers as a Community trade mark. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Fides B. Baldesberger |
| Community trade mark sought: | Three-dimensional mark depicting tweezers, for goods in class 8 – Application No 5480108 |
| Decision of the examiner: | Registration refused |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Ms Fides B. Baldesberger to pay the costs. |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; R13 Conference Grant Applications.                    

*Date:*                         February 22, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, NIDDK Democracy II, Suite 7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jian Yang, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 7111, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-7799,                         *yangj@extra.niddk.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 22, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-28678 Filed 12-27-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IB 

Union Calendar No. 542 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4689 

[Report No. 115–700] 

To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau of Reclamation 

within the Northport Irrigation District in the State of Nebraska. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2017 

Mr. SMITH of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Natural Resources 

MAY 22, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4689 RH

A BILL 

To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau 

of Reclamation within the Northport Irrigation District 

in the State of Nebraska. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4689 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EARLY REPAYMENT OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 213 of 

5 the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390mm), 

6 any landowner within the Northport Irrigation District in 

7 the State of Nebraska (referred to in this section as the 

8 ‘‘District’’) may repay, at any time, the construction costs 

9 of project facilities allocated to the landowner’s land with10 in the District. 

11 (b) APPLICABILITY OF FULL-COST PRICING LIMITA12 TIONS.—On discharge, in full, of the obligation for repay13 ment of all construction costs described in subsection (a) 

14 that are allocated to all land the landowner owns in the 

15 District in question, the parcels of land shall not be sub16 ject to the ownership and full-cost pricing limitations 

17 under Federal reclamation law (the Act of June 17, 1902, 

18 32 Stat. 388, chapter 1093), and Acts supplemental to 

19 and amendatory of that Act (43 U.S.C. 371 et seq.), in20 cluding the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (13 U.S.C. 

21 390aa et seq.). 

22 (c) CERTIFICATION.—On request of a landowner that 

23 has repaid, in full, the construction costs described in sub24 section (a), the Secretary of the Interior shall provide to 

25 the landowner a certificate described in section 213(b)(1) 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 4689 RH

1 of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 

2 390mm(b)(1)). 

3 (d) EFFECT.—Nothing in this section— 

4 (1) modifies any contractual rights under, or 

5 amends or reopens, the reclamation contract between 

6 the District and the United States; or 

7 (2) modifies any rights, obligations, or relation8 ships between the District and landowners in the 

9 District under Nebraska State law. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS

daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 542 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4689 

[Report No. 115–700] 

A BILL 

To authorize early repayment of obligations to the 

rigation District in the State of Nebraska. Bureau of Reclamation within the Northport IrMAY 22, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          46,840
<SECURITIES>                                    65,779
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,873
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     26,010
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               176,343
<PP&E>                                          18,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,113
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 193,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,788
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            32
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   193,016
<SALES>                                        205,312
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,409
<CGS>                                          106,449
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,449
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,718
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (3,677)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,419
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,816
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,603
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,603
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASIDNGTON, DC
Anoka Air, Inc., et a! Complainant, 

### v. FAA Docket No. 16-11-12 Metropolitan Airports Commission Respondent.

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME
This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based onthe abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practicefor Federally-Assisted AirportEnforcementProceedings, 14 CPR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CPR, Part 16, subpart B, the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to May 7, 2015. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination inthis case.

D· ector ofAirport Compliance and

Management Analysis DateCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on



# ~{/'vttCl (( 2015, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice ofExtension ofTime addressed to:
Counsel for Complainant: Steven M. Taber, Esq. Taber Law Group 13 Atlanta Irvine, CA 92620 Facsimile: (714) 707-4282 Counsel for Respondent: Thomas W. Anderson, Esq. General Counsel Metropolitan Airports Commission 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450 Facsimile: (612) 726-5306 Pablo 0. Niiesch, Esq. Spiegel & McDiarmid LLP 1333 New Hampshire Ave., NW Washington, DC 20036 Facsimile: (202) 393-2866 Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100

(1



# /f/. )/.A 

## ):_



## &[(A~./

## bi l/L/"- Claudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance

and Management Analysis
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, Robert S. Stefanovich certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Xcorporeal, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant is made known to us by others within the entity, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 11, 2007 /s/ ROBERT S. STEFANOVICH   Robert S. Stefanovich   Interim Chief Financial Officer(*Principal Financial Officer*)
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to



Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005(the Report) of
MCG Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael R. McDonnell, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best
of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    MICHAEL R. MCDONNELLName: Michael R. McDonnellDate: August 4, 2005
# C_2008247EN.01001602.xml

| 27.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/16

---

Action brought on 17 July 2008 — Grazer Wechselseitige Versicherung v Commission

(Case T-282/08)

(2008/C 247/31)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Grazer Wechselseitige Versicherung AG (Graz, Austria) (represented by: H. Wollmann, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Pursuant to Article 231(1) EC, annul Commission Decision C(2008) 1625 final of 30 April 2008 (No C 56/2006, ex NN 77/2006 — Privatisation of the Bank Burgenland) in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

Pursuant to Article 231(1) EC, annul Commission Decision C(2008) 1625 final of 30 April 2008 (No C 56/2006, ex NN 77/2006 — Privatisation of the Bank Burgenland) in its entirety;

| — | Pursuant to Article 87(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court, order the Commission to pay the applicant's costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Pursuant to Article 87(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court, order the Commission to pay the applicant's costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant contests Commission Decision C(2008) 1625 final of 30 April 2008 in which the Commission decided that the State aid which Austria granted in contravention of Article 88(3) EC to the Versicherungsgesellschaft Grazer Wechselseitige Versicherung AG and the GW Beteiligungserwerbs- und -verwaltungsGmbH in the context of the privatisation of the HYPO Bank Burgenland AG is incompatible with the common market.

In support of its action the applicant claims first that the Commission misapplied Article 87(1) EC in a number of respects. In particular it argues in that regard that there are several indications that the market value of the privatised bank at the time of the sale was significantly lower than the purchase price offered by the applicant, meaning that it was not given preferential treatment when the sale took place.

Moreover, it is claimed that the defendant misapplied the private vendor test. In that regard the applicant asserts that the Commission's argument that it was impermissible in the context of the decision to award aid to take into account the legal guarantee (‘Ausfallhaftung’) by the Land of Burgenland for certain liabilities of the privatised bank is wrong. Furthermore, the applicant claims in that context that the Commission proceeds not from the model of a genuine private sector investor but from the fiction of a seller prepared to assume a 100 % risk.

In addition, the applicant argues that the Commission has not proved that the applicant's offer was nominally worse than the offer of the competing bidder after all the necessary adjustments were carried out.

In the alternative, the applicant argues that the Commission failed, in assuming there to be a State aid, to examine its compatibility with the common market in the light of Article 87(3)(c) EC.

Finally, the applicant claims that the reasoning of the contested decision is deficient in a number of respects.

---