alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.3
                         PROMISSORY NOTE

                         PROMISSORY NOTE

Principal amount $5,000.00                         Date: November 17, 2003

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, RMD Technologies, Inc. hereby promise to
pay to the order of Patrick A. Galliher the sum of Five Thousand
Dollars, together with interest thereon at the rate of 1% per month on
the unpaid balance. Said sum shall be paid upon demand.

     This note shall at the option of any holder thereof be
immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of any of the
following:  1) Breach of any condition of any security interest,
mortgage, loan agreement, pledge agreement or guarantee granted as
collateral security for this note. 2) Breach of any condition of any
loan agreement, security agreement or mortgage, if any, having a
priority over any loan agreement, security agreement or mortgage on
collateral granted, in whole or in part, as collateral security for
this note. 3) Upon the death, incapacity, dissolution or liquidation
of any of the undersigned, or any endorser, guarantor to surety
hereto. 4) Upon the filing by any of the undersigned of an assignment
for the benefit of creditors, bankruptcy or other form of insolvency,
or by suffering an involuntary petition in bankruptcy or receivership
not vacated within thirty (30) days.

     In the event this note shall be in default and placed for
collection, then the undersigned agree to pay all reasonable attorney
fees and costs of collection. All payments hereunder shall be made to
such address as may from time to time be designated by any holder.

     The undersigned and all other parties to this note, whether as
endorsers, guarantors or sureties, agree to remain fully bound until
this note shall be fully paid and waive demand, presentment and
protest and all notices hereto and further agree to remain bound,
notwithstanding any extension, modification, waiver, or other
indulgence or discharge or release of any obligor hereunder or
exchange, substitution, or release of any collateral granted as
security for this note. No modification or indulgence by any holder
hereof shall be binding unless in writing; and any indulgence on any
one occasion shall not be an indulgence for any other or future
occasion. Any modification or change in terms, hereunder granted by
any holder hereof, shall be valid and binding upon each of the
undersigned, notwithstanding the acknowledgement of any of the
undersigned, and each of the undersigned does hereby irrevocably grant
to each of the others a power of attorney to enter into any such
modification on their behalf. The rights of any holder hereof shall be
cumulative and not necessarily successive. This note shall take effect
as a sealed instrument and shall be construed, governed and enforced
in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

                                       RMD Technologies, Inc.


                                       By: /s/  Pat Galliher
                                       Pat Galliher, President
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

The subsidiaries of Allied Holdings, Inc. and the place of incorporation or
organization are as follows:

Allied Automotive Group, Inc. - Georgia
Axis Group, Inc. - Georgia
Allied Systems, Ltd., LLP - Georgia
Inter Mobile, Inc. - Georgia
Legion Transportation, Inc. - Georgia
Automotive Transport Services, Inc. - Georgia
Allied Systems (Canada) Company - Nova Scotia
Axis International, Inc. - Georgia
Axis Truck Leasing, Inc. - Georgia
Axis North America, Inc. - Georgia
Kar-Tainer International, Inc. - Florida
Canadian Acquisition Corp. - Georgia
RC Management Corp. - Delaware
GACS Incorporated - Florida
Allied Freight Broker, Inc. - Virginia
QAT, Inc. - Florida
OSCHO, Inc. - Florida
Terminal Service Co. - Washington
F.J. Boutell Driveaway Co., Inc. - Michigan
RMX, Inc. - Delaware
Transport Support, Inc. - Delaware
Commercial Carriers, Inc. - Michigan
B&C Inc. - Michigan
Haul Insurance Limited - Cayman Islands
AH Industries, Inc. - Alberta
Kar-Tainer International Limited - Bermuda
Axis Netherlands, LLC - Georgia
Axis Netherlands C.V. - Netherlands
Axis do Brazil, Ltda.
Axis Areta, LLC - Georgia
Arrendadora de Equipo para el Transporte de Automoviles, s. de R.L. de C.V.-
  Mexico
Axis Logistica, S. de R.L. de C.V. - Mexico
Logistic Technology, LLC - Georgia
Kar-Tainer International (Pty) Ltd. - South Africa
Axis Canada Company - Nova Scotia
Allied ASL Holdings, Inc.
CT Services, Inc. - Michigan
CT Group, Inc. - Michigan
Cordin Transport, Inc. - Michigan
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 1, 2013

t0325

Order 

April 1, 2013

146062

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146062

COA: 309280

Monroe CC: 83-019891-FY

JUAN CARLOS BIJARRO,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 18, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Order issued November 14, 2012

In The 

## &tort nI Apprats J1TiIttBistrirt of &rxasatDallas

No. 05-12-01480-CV
PLANO AMI LP, Appellant

V. ERWIN CRUZ, M.D., Appellee


### ORDER
This case is appropriate for mediation pursuant to Chapter 154 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. 

### See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 154.001-.073 (West 2011). Mark Whittington shall serve as mediator. Any objection to this Order must be filed and served upon all parties and the mediator within 10 days from the date of this Order; an objection that is neither timely filed nor ruled upon before the scheduled mediation may be waived. Mediation is a mandatory but nonbinding settlement conference, conducted with the assistance of the mediator. Mediation is private, confidential and privileged. After mediation, the mediator will advise the Court only that the case did or did not settle. Unless the mediator agrees to mediate without fee according to section D(3) of the Court's ADR Procedures, the mediator will negotiate a reasonable fee with the parties, which shall be divided and borne equally by the parties unless agreed otherwise, paid by parties directly to the mediator, and taxed as costs. If the parties do not agree upon the fee requested by themediator, the Court will set a reasonable fee, which shall be taxed as costs. All parties and their

counsel are bound by the mediation rules attached to this order and shall complete the information forms furnished by the mediator. Before the first scheduled mediation session, all parties shall provide the mediator and all attorneys of record with an information sheet setting forth their positions about the issues that need to be resolved. At or before the first session, all parties shall produce all information necessary for the mediator to understand the issues presented. The mediator may require any party to supplement the information provided. Named parties shall be present during the entire mediation process and each corporate party must be represented by an executive officer with authority to settle. Mediation shall take place at a time to be agreed by the parties and the mediator, but no later than 45 days after appellant's brief is filed. This order does not toll any appellate time period or portion thereof Failure or refusal to attend the mediation as scheduled may result in the imposition of sanctions, as permitted by law. The mediator shall notify the Court about the outcome of the mediation within 10 days of the conclusion of the mediation session pursuant to Fifth District Court of Appeals Local Rule 3. 5th Tex. App. (DALLAS) Loc. R. 3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 29, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 22, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 153 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-141, CP2024-147.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-28741 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# • F=PL .

April15, 2 014

Ms. H eat h er M. Ce ron, C hi ef Air Permits Branch U.S. Environ mental Protecti o n Agenc y Region IV 61 Forsyt h Stree t , SW A tl anta, GA 30303 Re: F PL Laude rd ale Com bu stion Turbin e P SD Ap plication Withdrawal of Permit App li catio n Dear Ms. Ceron, On J a nuary 7, EPA published in th e Federa l Regi s ter a proposed approval of Florida 's G re e nh ouse Gas (GHG) S tat e Imp lement ation Pl an (SIP). F PL under s tand s tl1at tl1e ftnal approva l of F lorida' s S IP by tl1e Administrator wi ll be expedited vety soo n . Accordi n g l y , F PL formally withdraws its Lauderdale Com bustion Turbine Project application and will @ e an amended PSD application to included GHG's upon n o tice ili at F l o rid a's G H G permitting SIP ha s been appro ved by tl1 e A dmini s trator. I'PL greatly a pp recia te s the hard work that EPA h as put int o th e timel y review of our ap p li cation.
S in cer ely, F lori d a Power & Li g ht C ompany

# ~).¥-- Matthew 

## J. Raffenberg Director, Environmental Li censing and Permitting CC (via e mail on ly ): J effe r y Koerner, P
. E. Florida Department of Environmental Prote c ti o n David Read , Florida D epa rtme nt of Environmental Protection Randall R. L aBauve , FPL J ohn Hampp, FPL Ke nn ard Proctor, FPL Ken n ard F. Kosky, P
.E ., Go ld er Associates, Inc.

Florida Po we r & Light Company 700 Universe Boulevard , Juno Bea ch, FL 33408
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5772]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             IN REMEMBRANCE OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001, TRAGEDY

  (Mr. CROWLEY asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. CROWLEY. Madam Speaker, I rise today in remembrance of those who 
lost their lives on September 11, 2001, 11 years ago today.
  For the Nation, September 11 marks the day that the course of history 
in the United States was changed forever. For New Yorkers, 9/11 was the 
day our great city suffered a grievous blow, leaving behind a hole in 
the heart of lower Manhattan, and an even bigger hole in all of our 
hearts.
  While many of the structures destroyed or damaged by the attacks are 
being rebuilt or renewed, the families who lost their loved ones can 
never replace the husbands, the wives, the fathers, the mothers, the 
brothers, the sisters, and the children who perished. We can also never 
replace the brave first responders who rushed in to the burning 
buildings, giving their lives for others.
  Not one single day goes by that families don't think of their loved 
ones who were lost, and we must ensure that 9/11's sacrifices are 
never, ever forgotten. Today, we stand together in honoring their 
memory and saluting their courage, which they so richly deserve.
  Johnny, we miss you.

                          ____________________
```
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ,

Petitioner

v.

GREENE COUNTY COURT AND, 

PROTHONOTARY, MRS. SUSAN WHITE,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 198 EM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of January, 2017, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.1



EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Craig H. Barratt, the chief executive officer of Atheros Communications, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of
section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,:



|(i) | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 16, 2005



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Craig H. Barratt                 
|Craig H. Barratt                     
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1517]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

        IN HONOR OF OHIO STATE REPRESENTATIVE NICKIE J. ANTONIO

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 13, 2012

  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in honor of State 
Representative Nickie J. Antonio of Ohio's 13th House District.
  Prior to public service, Representative Antonio was a former special 
education teacher, an Executive Director at a non-profit for women's 
drug and alcohol treatment programs, an administrator for a multi-
county HIV/AIDS group, an adjunct professor at Cleveland State 
University in Women's Studies and Public Administration. She served 
over two decades as a consultant to various non-profits and government 
agencies in Northeast Ohio.
  In 2005, Representative Antonio was elected to the Lakewood City 
Council where she sat for a total of five years, chairing the Economic 
Development; Housing; and Human Services committees and also sat as a 
member of the Public Works and Finance Committees. While a Lakewood 
council representative, she served on the Lakewood Hospital Board for 
four years, fought to retain funding for senior programs and services, 
and was a founder of the Lakewood Relations Advisory Commission which 
is aimed at promoting citizen human rights and expanding the scope of 
existing intimidation laws.
  As a State Representative, Antonio sits on the Commerce and Labor; 
Education, Health, and Aging; and Ohio House Committees. She also 
earned an appointment to the Joint Legislative Committee for Long-Term 
Care Services and Supports as well as the Commission on Developmental 
Disabilities. She serves as a policy co-chair for the Ohio Women's 
Legislative Caucus, is a member of the Ohio House Progressive Caucus, 
and is a past chair of both the American Cancer Society Relay for Life 
Event and the Cuyahoga Democratic Women's Caucus where she continues to 
sit on the steering committee.
  Mr. Speaker and colleagues, please join me in honoring the 
achievements of State Representative Nickie J. Antonio.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2008260EN.01001402.xml

| 11.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/14

---

Action brought on 30 July 2008 — Tresplain Investments v OHIM — Hoo Hing (Golden Elephant Brand)

(Case T-303/08)

(2008/C 260/26)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Tresplain Investments Ltd (Hong Kong, China) (represented by: D. McFarland, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hoo Hing Holdings Ltd (Romford, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 May 2008 in case R 889/2007-1; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 May 2008 in case R 889/2007-1; and

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The figurative mark ‘Golden Elephant Brand’ for goods in class 30 — Community trade mark registration No 241 810

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: The unregistered figurative mark ‘GOLDEN ELEPHANT’, which had been in use in the United Kingdom

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the decision of the Cancellation Division

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 73 and 74(1) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal erred by taking into account alleged facts, as well as legal presumptions and assumptions that had not been introduced or substantiated by the parties, while at the same time it refused to take into account other facts, evidence and arguments advanced by the applicant; infringement of Article 8(4) of Council Regulation 40/94 as the Board of Appeal erred in its finding that there was a likelihood of relevant confusion between the trade marks concerned and, as a result, a likelihood of damage.

Pleas in law:

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6105]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  REPORT RELATIVE TO THE CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH 
RESPECT TO THE TERRORIST ATTACKS ON THE UNITED STATES OF SEPTEMBER 11, 
                              2001--PM 62

  The PRESIDING OFFICER laid before the Senate the following message 
from the President of the United States, together with an accompanying 
report; which was referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 
Urban Affairs:

To the Congress of the United States
  Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)) 
provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, 
within the 90-day period prior to the anniversary date of its 
declaration, the President publishes in the Federal Register and 
transmits to the Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to 
continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. Consistent with this 
provision, I have sent to the Federal Register the enclosed notice, 
stating that the emergency declared with respect to the terrorist 
attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001, is to continue in 
effect for an additional year.
  The terrorist threat that led to the declaration on September 14, 
2001, of a national emergency continues. For this reason, I have 
determined that it is necessary to continue in effect after September 
14, 2012, the national emergency with respect to the terrorist threat.
                                                        Barack Obama.  
The White House, September 11, 2012.

                          ____________________
```