alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pre-2005 Disability Program






Summary of 

Dollar General Corporation Supplemental Executive Disability Program 

(Pre-2005)




Dollar General Corporation (the “Company”) has purchased individual disability policies for the following named executive officers: David Perdue, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Stonie O’Briant, Executive Vice President of Merchandising, Marketing and Strategic Planning. These policies were purchased prior to the establishment on December 7, 2004 of the Company’s Supplemental Disability Program for officers and certain highly compensated employees. These policies will continue on an individual basis and the Company will continue paying premiums.




Prior to December 7, 2004, the Company established a supplemental disability program for officers with annual base salaries greater than $400,000. UnumProvident was the insurance provider and issued individual disability insurance policies to eligible officers.  The Company pays the premiums and also grosses up these payments to cover required taxes.  This supplemental disability program was effective for policies written prior to January 1, 2005.




This program provides a disability income benefit to at least age 65 and generally in the amount of 60% of base salary as offset by the amount of any other disability income protection provided to employees on a group or individual basis, including without limitation the Company's long-term disability plan for exempt salaried employees.  The disability insurance is subject to individual underwriting.    The specific amount of supplemental disability coverage available to eligible officers under these policies is the lesser of 60% of base salary in excess of $400,000; $5,000 per month; or the maximum amount of coverage permitted by the insurance provider based on its maximum issue and participation underwriting guidelines.  Prior to January 1, 2005, the Company's group long-term disability plan for exempt salaried employees provided a benefit of up to 60% of base salary with a maximum of $20,000 per month. Effective January 1, 2005, the maximum was reduced to $15,000 per month and a new supplemental disability program was established.
Exhibit 10.19
 EXECUTIVE OFFICER W/EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 ULTRATECH, INC.  GRANT AGREEMENT
 WITNESSETH
 RECITALS
   NOW, THEREFORE
 Grant of Option .
 Option Term .
 Limited Transferability .




---



##### 



Dates of Exercise .
    Cessation of Service .
    2




---



##### 



earlier
      3




---



##### 



Service
 Employee
 permanently disabled permanent disability
 subsidiary
 parent
 involuntary termination
  4




---



##### 



provided, however,
 Employment agreement
 Corporate Transaction .
     5




---



##### 



provided
   Adjustment in Option Shares .  6
       Privilege of Stock Ownership .
 Manner of Exercising Option .
         7




---



##### 



Governing Law .
 Compliance with Laws and Regulations .
 Successors and Assigns .
 Liability of Corporation .
   8




---



##### 



Employment/Service At Will .
 Notices .
 Construction .
 Additional Terms Applicable to an Incentive Stock Option .
    9




---



##### 



Additional Terms Applicable to a Non-Statutory Stock Option .
  10




---



##### 



Leave of Absence
       11




---



##### 



EXHIBIT I
 NOTICE OF EXERCISE OF STOCK OPTION
   
 OptioneeAddress:Print name in exact manner it is to appear on the stock certificate:Address to which certificate is to be sent, if different from address above:Social Security Number:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 114 (Monday, July 30, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1349-E1350]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           75TH ANNIVERSARY OF UNITED STEELWORKERS LOCAL 264

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. BETTY McCOLLUM

                              of minnesota

                    in the house of representatives

                         Monday, July 30, 2012

  Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Speaker, today I rise to honor the members and 
families of United Steelworkers, USW, Local 264 on the occasion of the 
75th anniversary of the union.
  Like the industry and workers it represents, Local 264 has grown and 
evolved during its long history to meet the needs of members and the 
challenges of the day. Starting as a small paper worker union in1937, 
the local served employees at five Saint Paul, Minnesota, paper plants 
as part of the International Brotherhood of Pulp, Sulfite, and Paper 
Mill Workers. More than 65 years and several union mergers later, the 
growing union eventually became the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, 
Rubber Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-industrial, and Service Workers 
International Union--the United Steelworkers. While many changes have 
occurred in the industry and the union's name, the local has always 
served its members first.
  United Steelworkers Local 264 works to cultivate positive 
relationships between its members and their employers, including 
RockTenn, one of the largest paper recyclers in America. In turn, the 
union is helping to set a high standard for all workers in our State 
and provides much needed resources for safety, skills training, fair 
wages and benefits, and retirement security.

[[Page E1350]]

  In past tough economic conditions that caused layoffs and plant 
closings, Local 264 rose to the challenge, working to advocate on 
behalf of its members. Their dedication to collective bargaining on 
behalf of members for fair wages and safe working conditions reflects a 
central idea that when employees are highly valued, they produce a high 
value work product.
  During its 75 year history, USW Local 264 has produced key leaders in 
the International Union. The union and its leaders have always kept an 
eye on what tomorrow might bring, making sure that whatever changes 
come in the future, that members come first. It is this diligent work 
on behalf of the hundreds of members in the Twin Cities that has earned 
them this reputation, as well as a deserved place in the history of 
Saint Paul and Minnesota.
  Mr. Speaker, in honor of the 75th anniversary of the United 
Steelworkers Local 264, I am pleased to submit this statement for the 
Congressional Record in recognition of the hardworking men and women 
who are proud members of the union.

                          ____________________
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**CHRIS DUNBAR,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 767 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 16th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allo wance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT JUNE 30, 1998 FOR THE
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000909123
<NAME>              PEORIA REAL ESTATE
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,866
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                       168
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,689
<PP&E>                                          25,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,966
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            65
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,421
<SALES>                                         31,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,153
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,924
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,456
<INCOME-TAX>                                       265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,191
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-14-0000567 24-APR-2014 11:18 AM

SCPW-14-0000567
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Respondent,

vs. ROY ALAN COSTA, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CR. NO. 00-1-0253) ORDER DENYING “DEFENDANT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF ALL CHARGES TOWARD COURTS UNTIMELY RESPONSE” (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Nakasone, assigned by reason of vacancy) Upon consideration of petitioner Roy Costa’s document entitled “Defendant Motion for Dismissal of All Charges Toward Courts Untimely Response,” which was filed as a petition for a writ of mandamus on April 15, 2014, and the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right to the requested relief and that he lacks alternative means to seek relief. An extraordinary writ, therefore, is not warranted. See Kema v. Gaddis , 91 Hawai ' i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitionerdemonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action); Honolulu Advertiser, Inc. v. Takao , 59 Haw. 237, 241, 580 P.2d 58, 62 (1978) (a writ of mandamus is not intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the trial courts, cure a mere legal error, or serve as a legal remedy in lieu of normal appellate procedure). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the petition is denied. IT IS HEREBY FINALLY ORDERED that the appellate clerks’ office shall not accept any further filings from petitioner in this closed proceeding. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, April 24, 2014. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Karen T. Nakasone
**Exhibit 31.2**

I, Bruce Wright, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Ultratech, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 24, 2015
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1515-E1516]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

         IN HONOR OF OHIO STATE REPRESENTATIVE SANDRA WILLIAMS

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 13, 2012

  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor State Representative 
Sandra Williams of Ohio's 11th District.

[[Page E1516]]

  Before taking a position in the State House, Representative Williams 
began her career in criminal justice. She served as a member of the 
United States Army Reserve between 1987 and 1995. She later held 
positions as a corrections officer, probation officer, parole officer 
and mediator.
  Her first job in the State House was as a legislative aide, a 
position she held for five years while gaining much needed insight and 
credentials that eventually earned her the trust of the voters she 
would soon represent. Representative Williams was first elected to be a 
State Representative in 2006 and is now in her third term. She is a 
ranking member of the House Public Utilities Committee and a member of 
the Criminal Justice and Economic and Small Business Committees.
  In addition to her legislative career, Representative Williams is a 
member of the Federated Democratic Women of Ohio, the National Council 
of Negro Women, the Improved Benevolent and Protective order of Elks, 
Ohio Democratic Women's Caucus, National Association for the 
Advancement of Colored People, and the Black Women's Political Action 
Committee. She also donates much of her time to the Cleveland Food Bank 
as a volunteer and is a former Street Club President and precinct 
committee person.
  Mr. Speaker and colleagues, please join me in honoring the 
achievements of State Representative Sandra Williams.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Timothy L. Smith, the President and Chief Executive Officer of NB&T Financial Group, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of NB&T Financial Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: April 11, 2005 |  | /s/ Timothy L. Smith                           
|                     |  | Timothy L. Smith                               
|                     |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



35
### The Honorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for 1 

### the Eastern District of Arkansas.



# United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-1802

___________ Mae E. Gettis, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. City of Little Rock Parks & * Recreation; City of Little * [UNPUBLISHED] Rock, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 20, 1997 Filed: March 28, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Mae E. Gettis appeals from the district court orde r granting summary 1 judgme nt to defendants in her employment discrimination action. Havin g reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm the judgment for the reasons set forth in the district court’s opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

### -2- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of  GRANT HAYWARD, INC., (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Kevin Ericksteen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Kevin
      Ericksteen


Kevin
      Ericksteen


Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




Date: October
      10, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4770 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4770

To amend the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 to permanently 
   extend the moratorium on leasing in certain areas of the Gulf of 
                                Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2018

Mr. Francis Rooney of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 to permanently 
   extend the moratorium on leasing in certain areas of the Gulf of 
                                Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting and Securing Florida's 
Coastline Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF MORATORIUM ON LEASING IN CERTAIN AREAS 
              OF THE GULF OF MEXICO.

    Section 104(a) of the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 
(43 U.S.C. 1331 note) is amended by striking ``Effective during'' and 
all that follows through ``the Secretary'' and inserting ``The 
Secretary''.
                                 <all>
```