CAUSE NUMBER 241-0978-04 "•fffr
i : 

# j IJUL I 3 2015
jCLERK 24 : BY IN THE 241st JTJDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS CAUSE NUMBER 241-0978-04 STATE OF TEXAS VS. TRACY BEATTY Capital Murder, Capital Felony as charged in the Indictment FORMAL SENTENCING PURSUANT TO MANDATE FROM TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ORDER SETTING DATE OF EXECUTION ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF WARRANT OF EXECUTION JUDGMENT
JUDGE PRESIDING AT TRIAL: JACK SKEEN, JR.

JUDGE PRESIDING AT FORMAL SENTENCING JACK SKEEN, JR.

ATTORNEY FOR STATE AT TRIAL: MATT BINGHAM J. BRETT HARRISON APRIL SIKES 

### UL16 2M5 Date originally sentenced and Judgment: 08-10-04
Date of formal sentencing: May 13, 2009, upon Mandate affirming case and Order Denying 11.071 State Writ: May 6, 2009
Date of re-sentencing following denial of federal habeas corpus relief: July 13, 2015

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT AT TRIAL: ROBERT C. PERKINS KEN HAWK ATTORNEY ON DIRECT APPEAL: DON DAVIDSONCAUSE NUMBER 241-0978-04

OFFENSE CHARGED: CAPITAL MURDER CONVICTED OF: CAPITAL MURDER DEGREE: CAPITAL FELONY CHARGING INSTRUMENT: INDICTMENT TERMS OF PLEA BARGAIN NONE PAGE

ATTORNEY ON 11.071 STATE WRIT: JEFF HAAS ATTORNEY ON FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS WRIT: THOMAS SCOTT SMITH ATTORNEY AT FINAL SENTENCING FOLLOWING DENIAL OF FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF: AUSTIN REEVE JACKSON

DATE OFFENSE COMMITTED NOVEMBER 25. 2003

PLEA: NOT GUILTY

DATE SENTENCE FORMALLY PRONOUNCED AND IMPOSED: AUGUST 10. 2004 COSTS: $273.00 

### Date Sentence Formally Pronounced following Mandate from Texas Court ofCriminal Appeals 

### affirming Judgment and Sentence, April 7, 2009, and following denial of 11.071 writ application May 6,2009: MAY 13. 2009 Date Sentence Formally Pronounced following Denial ofFederal Habeas Corpus Relief: JULY 13. 2015 DATE OF EXECUTION: 08/13/2015 as provided by law
Punishment: Death by lethal injection as provided by law Place of Execution: As provided by law inthe Texas Department ofCriminal Justice

- Institutional Division (formerly Texas Department of Corrections, State Penitentiary) Date Set for Execution: 08/13/2015 as provided by lawCAUSENUMBER 241-0978-04 PAGE
JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE UPON FORMAL SENTENCING WARRANT OF EXECUTION 

### The Defendanthaving been indicted in the above entitled and numbered cause for the felony offense of CAPITAL MURDER as charged in the indictment, acapital felony, and this cause being 

### called forjury selection on JULY 08, 2004, the State appeared by her Criminal District Attorney MATT BINGHAM and Assistant District Attorneys J. BRETT HARRISON AND APRIL SIKES, and the Defendant TRACY BEATTY, appeared in person and his counsel ROBERT C. PERKINS 

### AND KEN HAWK, also being present and both parties announced ready and jury selection commenced, and the Defendant in open court was duly arraigned and pleaded Not Guilty to the 

### charge ofCapital Murder as contained in the indictmentherein, thereuponjury, to-wit: MITCHELL HARRIS, and eleven others, were duly selected, along with one alternatejuror, andupon completion 

### of jury selectionthejurywas impaneled and sworn. On AUGUST 2,2004 the Courtproceeded with the trial with the reading ofthe indictment, the Defendantentering his plea of"Not Guilty," opening statements, and introduction of evidence. Thejury, who having heard the evidence submitted, and 

### having been duly charged by the court, and after hearing argument ofcounsel, retired in the charge 

### ofthe proper officer to consider their verdict, and afterward were brought into open Court, by the proper officer, the Defendant and his counsel being present, and in due form oflaw returned into open Courtthe following unanimous verdict, which was receivedby the Court, and is here and now entered upon the minutes of the Court, to wit: 

### WE, THE JURY, find unanimously andbeyond areasonable doubt, the Defendant, TRACY 

### BEATTY, Guilty ofCapital Murder, that is intentional murder committed in the course of committing burglary ofahabitation, as charged inthe indictment.

AS/ MITCHELL HARRIS FOREMAN 

### The Defendant having been found guilty ofCapital Murder by the verdict ofthe jury and 

### thereupon further evidence being heard by thejury on the special issues pertaining to punishment, the Court again charged thejury as provided by law on the following special issues:
•SPECIAL ISSUE NO. 1 

### Is there aprobability that the Defendant, TRACY BEATTY, would commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing threat to society? SPECIAL ISSUE NO. 2 

### Taking into consideration all ofthe evidence, including the circumstances ofthe offense, the Defendant's character and background, and the personal moral culpability of the Defendant, is thereCAUSE NUMBER 241-0978-04 PAGE sufficient mitigating circumstance orcircumstances towarrant that a sentence oflife imprisonment rather than a death sentence be imposed? The jury, after hearing arguments ofcounsel, retired in charge ofthe proper officer to consider their verdict and afterwards were brought into open Court by the proper officer; the Defendant and his counsel being present and in due form of law returned into open Court the following verdict, which was received by the Court and is here and now entered upon the minutes of the Court, to-wit:
ANSWER TO SPECIAL ISSUE NUMBER 1: We, thejury unanimously find and determine beyond areasonable doubt that the answer to this Special Issue No. 1 is "YES." As/ MITCHELL HARRIS FOREMAN ANSWER TO SPECIAL ISSUE NUMBER 2: We, thejury unanimously find and determine beyond areasonable doubt that the answer to this Special Issue No. 2 is "NO." /s/ MITCHELL HARRIS FOREMAN
JURY CERTIFICATE WE, THE JURY, RETURN INOPEN COURT THE ABOVE ANSWER OR ANSWERS AS OUR ANSWER OR ANSWERS TO THE SPECIAL ISSUE OR SPECIAL ISSUES SUBMITTED TO US, AND THE SAME IS OUR VERDICT IN THIS CASE.

/s/ MITCHELL HARRIS FOREMAN IT IS THEREFORE considered and adjudged bythe Court, that the said Defendant isguilty ofthe offense ofCapital Murder, as charged in the indictment, a Capital Felony; and that the said Defendant committed saidoffense onor about the25* dayofNOVEMBER, 2003, as found bythe 

### jury, and that he be punished, as has been determined by thejury's answers to the special issues and in accordance with State law byimposition ofthe sentence ofDEATH, according to the law.CAUSE NUMBER 241-0978-04 PAGE 5
THEREUPON the said Defendant was informed by the Court of the mandatory appeal of this 

### Judgment and Sentence to the Texas Court ofCriminal Appeals as provided by law and rights to an 

### 11.071 Application for Writ ofHabeas Corpus, and further the said Defendant was asked by the Court whether he had anything to say why said sentence should not be pronounced against him, 

### subject to the mandatory appeal and mandate, and he answered nothing in bar thereof, and it appearing to the Court that the Defendant is mentally competent and understands the English language, the Court proceeded, then in the presence ofthe Defendant, his counsel, and counsel for the State, to pronounce sentence, subject to mandatory appeal, against him as follows: IT IS THE ORDER OF THE COURT, that the said Defendant, TRACY BEATTY, isguilty ofthe offense ofCAPITAL MURDER, as charged inthe indictment, aCapital Felony; and that the said Defendant, TRACY BEATTY, committed said offense ofCAPITAL MURDER on orabout 

### the 25th day of NOVEMBER, 2003, as found by the jury, and that he be punished, as has been determined by thejury's answers to the special issues along with Texas law, by imposition ofthe 

### punishment ofDEATH, according to the law, and said Defendant is remanded to the Sheriff of Smith County, Texas to be delivered to the Director ofthe Texas Department ofCorrections (Texas 

### DepartmentofCriminalJustice, Institutional Division), orotherperson legally authorized to receive said Defendant, to be held until the date for execution as set out inthisjudgment and Death Warrant with date of execution, as provided by law. The Court certified the record for appeal and an appeal to the Texas Court ofCriminal 

### Appeals followed. On the 7TM day ofAPRIL, 2009, the Texas Court ofCriminal Appeals issued its Mandate inthis cause ofaction and finding that there was no error inthejudgment ofthe trial court, it ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the judgment ofthe trial court be in all things affirmed, and that the Defendant pay all costs in this behalf expended and that the Defendant's motion for rehearing be denied. The trial court received the Mandate commanding the trial court to observe the order ofthe Texas Court ofCriminal Appeals in this case and toduly recognize, obey and execute said mandate. On MAY 6, 2009 the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issued its Order denying the Defendant's Application for a State 11.071 WritofHabeas Corpus. 

### After exhausting his state court remedies, Defendant filed afederal habeas petition, which the federal district court rejected. The Fifth Circuit Court ofAppeals affirmed the denial of a 

### certificate ofappealability on July 16, 2014. Finally, on May 18,2015, the United States Supreme Court refused review of this matter. 

### On July 13, 2015, this case was again called for formal sentencing in accordance with the verdicts and Judgment herein rendered and entered against the Defendant, TRACY BEATTY, on 

### August 10, 2004. The State appeared by her Criminal District Attorney, MATT BINGHAM, (togetherwithherAssistant Criminal DistrictAttorney APRIL SIKES) and the Defendant, TRACY

### CAUSE NUMBER 241 -0978-04 PAGE 

## BEATTY appeared in person and with AUSTIN REEVE JACKSON, as his current counsel for formal setting ofadate ofexecution, and whereupon the State ofTexas announced ready and the Defendantannouncedready, andtheDefendantofferednothing atbaras to why the dateofexecution should not be set, the Court proceeding with formal sentencing and setting the date ofexecution. 

### Thereuponthe Defendant, TRACY BEATTY, throughhis counsel was asked by the Courtwhether 

### he had anything to say oroffer atbar as to why sentence should notbe formally pronounced against him and said counsel indicated there was nothing he had to offer at bar as to why sentence should 

### not be formally pronounced and adate ofexecution set. It appearing to the Court the Defendant, TRACY BEATTY is mentally competent and understanding of the English language, the Court 

## proceeded, inthepresenceofthe saidDefendant, TRACYBEATTY, andallhis counsel andcounsel for the State, in open court to formally pronounce Judgment and Sentence against the Defendant in 

### accordance with thejury's verdicts and mandate ofthe Texas Court ofCriminal Appeals, to set the date ofexecution, and to order issuance ofthe Warrant ofExecution as follows: 

### IT IS THE ORDER OF THE COURT, that the said Defendant, TRACY BEATTY, who has 

## been adjudged to be GUILTY of the felony offense ofCAPITAL MURDER, as charged in the indictment in this cause, a Capital Felony; and that the said Defendant, TRACY BEATTY, committed said offense on the 25th day of NOVEMBER, 2003, as found by the jury, and whose 

### punishmenthas been assessedby application oflaw to the verdicts ofthe Jury on the Special Issues submitted and the Judgment ofthe Court, by DEATH, according to law, and, it is ORDERED, that the Defendant, TRACY BEATTY, be taken bythe SheriffofSmith County, Texas, and byhimkept 

### in custodyuntil the Clerkofthis Court shall issue anddeliverto said Sheriffa DEATHWARRANT (also known as aWARRANT OF EXECUTION), in accordance with this Judgment and Sentence, directed to the Director ofthe Texas Department of Criminal Justice

- Institutional Division 

### (formerlyknown as the Texas DepartmentofCorrections, State Penitentiary), at Huntsville, Texas 

### commanding him, the said Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice

- Institutional Division (formerly known as the Texas Department ofCorrections

- State Penitentiary) to put into 

### execution the Judgment and Sentence of DEATH against the said TRACY BEATTY, and immediatelyupon the issuance ofsaidWARRANT OFEXECUTION, the SheriffofSmith County Texas is directed to take the said TRACY BEATTY, together with the said WARRANT OF EXECUTION, to the Director of the Texas Department ofCriminal Justice

- Institutional Division 

### (formerlyknown as theTexas DepartmentofCorrections, StatePenitentiary) orotherperson legally authorized to receive such convicts, and deliver the said TRACY BEATTY and said WARRANT OF EXECUTION into the custody ofsaid Director ofthe Texas Department ofCriminal Justice

- 

### Institutional Division (formerlyknown as the Texas DepartmentofCorrections, State Penitentiary), and the said Director ofthe Texas Department ofCriminal Justice

-Institutional Division (formerly 

### known as the Texas Department ofCorrections, State Penitentiary) is hereby COMMANDED and DIRECTED tokeep the said TRACY BEATTY until the 13th DAY OF AUGUST. 2015 

### upon which day, at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice

- Institutional Division (formerlyCAUSE NUMBER 241-0978-04 PAGE 

### known as the Texas Department of Corrections, State Penitentiary), at any time after the hour of 

### 6:00p.m. in aroom arranged for the purpose ofexecution, the Director ofthe Texas Department of Criminal Justice

- Institutional Division (formerly known as the Texas Department ofCorrections, 

### State Penitentiary) is hereby, acting by and through the executioner assigned by said Director as 

### provided by law, COMMANDED, ORDERED, and DIRECTED to carry out this Judgment and Sentence ofDEATH by intravenous injection ofa substance or substances in a lethal quantity sufficientto cause the death of the said TRACY BEATTY and until said TRACY BEATTY is dead, 

### such procedure to be determined and supervised, in accordance with law, by the said Directorofthe Texas Department of Criminal Justice

- Institutional Division (formerly known as the Texas Department ofCorrections, State Penitentiary). ORDERED IN OPEN COURT ON THE 13TM DAY OF JULY, 2015. SIGNED ON THIS THE 13TM DAY OF JULY, 2015. 

# Jwtt&in, HONORABLE JACK SKEEN, JRl JUDGE, 241st DISTRICT COURT SMITH COUNTY, TEXASCAUSE NUMBER 241-0978-04 PAGE 8

ORDER THEREFORE, it is the further ORDER and the Judgment ofthis Court that the Director of the Texas Department ofCriminal Justice

- Institutional Division (formerly known as the Texas 

### Department ofCorrections, State Penitentiary), acting by and through the executioner assigned by said Director as provided by law, be and is hereby DIRECTED, ORDERED and COMMANDED 

### to, at any time after the hour of6:00 p.m. on the 13th dav of AUGUST. 2015, in aroom arranged for the purpose ofexecution at the Texas Department ofCriminal Justice

- Institutional Division (formerly known as the Texas Department ofCorrections, State Penitentiary) to carry out this Judgment and Sentence of DEATH by intravenous injection ofasubstance or substances in alethal quantity sufficientto cause the death of the saidTRACY BEATTY and until saidTRACY BEATTY is dead, such procedure to be determined and supervised, in accordance with law, by the said Director ofthe Texas Department ofCriminal Justice

- Institutional Division (formerly known as the Texas Department of Corrections, State Penitentiary).
SIGNED THIS THE 13TM DAY OF JULY, 2015 HONORABLE JACK SKEEN, J JUDGE, 241ST DISTRICT COUR1 SMITH COUNTY, TEXASCAUSE NUMBER 241-0978-04 PAGE
WARRANT OF EXECUTION 

### ALLIN ACCORDANCE with this WarrantofExecution (DeathWarrant) for the execution 

### ofthe sentence ofDEATH, and in accordance with theJudgment, Sentence, and Order Setting Date 

### ofExecution and Order for Issuance ofWarrant ofExecution ofthis Court, show herein, which I 

### certify to be true and correct copies ofsuch documents now on file in my office and entered on the Minutes ofsaid Court. A certified true and correctcopies ofthe Judgment and Sentence enteredby the Court on AUGUST 10, 2004 which was affirmed by the Texas Court ofCriminal Appeals, is attached hereto as Exhibit "A." 

### HEREINFAILNOT, BUTDUERETURN MAKEOFTHEWARRANT OFEXECUTION SHOWING HOW YOU HAVE EXECUTED THE SAME. 

### Given under my hand and seal ofthe 241st Judicial District Court ofSmith County, Texas on this the 13TM day of July, 2015.



### JIM.$?!M5V ^KQuO * LOIS ROGERS DISTRICT CLERK/SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS CLERK OF THE 241st JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT 

### SMTfHQP 

### ^

EPUTY-DISTR1CT CLERK Print Name: Denise Langston

# FILED AU6 102004

JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE OF DEATH

STATE OF TEXAS
VS. CAUSE NO. 241-0978-04
X
X
X TRACY BEATTY CAPITAL MURDER, CAPITAL FELONY as charged in the Indictment IN THE 241s'DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

JUDGMENT JUDGE PRESIDING : JACK SKEEN. JR. JUDGMENT DATE: August 10, 2004 ATTORNEY FOR STATE: MATT BINOHAM/BRETT HARRISON APRIL SIKES OFFENSE CHARGED: CAPITAL MURDER CONVICTED OF: CAPITAL MURDER DEGREE: CAPITAL FELONY CHARGING INSTRUMENT: INDICTMENT TERMS OF PLEA BARGAIN: NONE ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT: ROBERT PERKINS KEN HAWK DATE OFFENSE COMMITTED: NOVEMBER 25. 2003

PLEA: NOT GUILTY
DATE SENTENCE FORMALLY PRONOUNCED AND IMPOSED: AUGUST 10. 2004 COURT COSTS: $273,00 SUBJECT TO MANDATORY APPEAL AS PROVIDED BY STATUTE PUNISHMENT AND PLACE OF CONFINEMENT: DEATH SENTENCEDEFENDANTORDERED HELD IN THE TEXAS DEPARTMENTOF CRIMINAL JUSTICEINSTITUTIONAL DIVISION UNIT UNTIL EXECUTED PURSUANT TO LAW AND THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE OF THE COURT. 

# cjft\\>X (yJUDGMENT AND SENTENCE OF DEATH PAGE 2

DATE DEATH PENALTY TO BE IMPOSED: TO BE SET AFTER MANDATORY APPEAL AS PROVIDED BY STATUTE

TIME OF CONFINEMENT TO DATE OF JUDGMENT: 224 DAYS RESTITUTION: NOT APPICABLE

JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND DEATH SENTENCE The Defendant having been indicted in the above entitled and numbered cause for the felony offense ofCapital Murder as charged in the indictment, a capital felony, and this cause being called forjury selection on JULY 8, 2004, the State appeared by her Criminal District Attorney P. MATT BINGHAM and Assistant District Attorneys J. BRETT HARRISON and APRIL SIKES. and the Defendant TRACY BEATTY. appeared in person and his counsel ROBERT PERKINS and KEN HAWK, also being present and both parties announced ready and jury selectioncommenced, and the Defendant in open court was duly arraigned and pleaded Not Guilty to the charge of Capital Murder as contained in the indictmentherein, thereupon, jury, towit: MITCHELL HARRIS and eleven others, wereduly selected, along with one alternatejuror, and upon completionof jury selection thejury was impaneledand sworn. On AUGUST2, 2004 the Courtproceeded withthe trial with the reading of the indictment, the defendant entering his plea of "NOT GUILTY", opening statements, and introductionofevidence. The jury, who having heard the evidence submitted, and having been duly charged by the court, and after hearing argument ofcounsel, retired in the charge of the properofficeto considertheirverdict, and afterward were brought into open Court, by the proper officer, the Defendantand his counsel being present, and in due form of law returned into openCourt the following unanimous verdict, whichwas received by the Court, and is hereand now entered upon the minutes ofthe Court, to wit: WE, THE JURY, find unanimously and beyond a reasonable doubt, the Defendant, TRACY BEATTY, Guilty ofCapital Murder, that is intentional murder committed in the course ofcommitting burglary ofa habitation, as charged in the indictment.
/S/MITCHELL HARRIS FOREMANJUDGMENT AND SENTENCE OF DEATH PAGE 3
The Defendant having been found guilty ofCapital Murder bythe verdict ofthejuryand thereupon further evidence being heard bythejuryonthe special issues pertaining to punishment, the Court again charged thejury as provided by law on the following special issues:
SPECIAL ISSUE NO. 1 Isthere aprobability that the defendant, TRACY BEATTY, would commit criminal acts ofviolence that would constitute a continuing threat to society? SPECIAL ISSUE NO. 2 Taking into consideration all ofthe evidence, including the circumstances ofthe offense, the defendant's character andbackground, andthe personal moral culpability of the defendant, is there sufficient mitigating circumstance or circumstances to warrant thata sentence of life imprisonment rather than a death sentence be imposed? Thejury, after hearing arguments of counsel, retired in charge of the proper officer to consider their verdict and afterwards were brought into open Court by the proper officer; the Defendant and his counsel being present and in due form of law returned into open Court the following verdict, which was received by the Courtand is here and now entered upon the minutes ofthe Court, to-wit: ANSWER TO SPECIAL ISSUE NUMBER 1: We, the jury unanimously find and determinebeyond a reasonable doubt that the answer to this Special Issue No. 1 is: "YES." /S/ MITCHELL HARRIS FOREMANJUDGMENT AND SENTENCE OF DEATH PAGE 4

ANSWER TO SPECIAL ISSUE NUMBER 2: We, thejury unanimously find and determine beyond a reasonable doubtthat the answer to this Special Issue No. 2 is "NO." /S/ MITCHELL HARRIS FOREMAN

JURY CERTIFICATE WE, THE JURY, RETURN IN OPEN COURT THE ABOVE ANSWER OR ANSWERS AS OUR ANSWER OR ANSWERS TO THE SPECIAL ISSUE OR SPECIAL ISSUES SUBMITTED TO US, AND THE SAME IS OUR VERDICT IN THIS CASE. /S/ MITCHELL HARRIS FOREMAN IT IS THEREFORE considered and adjudged by the Court, that the said Defendant is guilty ofthe offense of Capital Murder, as charged in the indictment, a Capital Felony, and that the said Defendant committed said offense on or about the 25TMday ofNovember, 2003, as found by the jury, and that he be punished, as has been determined by thejury's answers to the special issues and in accordance with State law by imposition ofthe sentence ofDEATH, according to the law. THEREUPON the said Defendant was informed by the Court ofthe mandatory appeal of this Judgmentand Sentenceto the Texas Court of CriminalAppealsas providedby law and rights to an 11.071 Application for Writ ofHabeas Corpus, and further the said Defendant was asked by the Court whether he had anything to say why said sentence should not be pronounced against him, subject to the mandatory appeal and mandate, and he answered nothing in bar thereof, and it appearing to the Court that the Defendant is mentally competent and understands the English language, the Court proceeded, then in the presence ofthe Defendant, his counsel, and counsel for the state, to pronounce sentence, subject to mandatory appeal, against him as follows:PAfiF S JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE OF DEATH 

### IT IS THE ORDER OF THE COURT, that the said Defendant, TRACY BEATTY, is 

## guilty ofthe offense ofCAPITALMURDER, as charged in the indictment'^J^ on that the said Defendant, TRACY BEATTY, committed said offense ofCAPTIAL MURDER on 

### or about the 25* day ofNovember, 2003, as found by thejury, and that he be punished, as ha 

## been detelinedbythejury's answers to the special issues along withTexas law byimpos.tion of he punishmentofDEATH, according to the law, and said Defendant ,s remanded o, the SheriffofSmith County, Texas to be delivered to the Director ofthe Texas Department of 

## S^<TM Cr«as Dep rtmentofCriminal Justice, Institutional Division), orotherperson Wally authorized to receive said Defendant, to beheld until a date to be determined and ordered by ms Court should the appeal in this causebe affirmed and the Mandate ofsame is return*1 to the Clerk ofthis Court, whereupon a DeathWarrant with date ofexecution shall be ordered as 

## providedby law, and there afterthe Defendanttransported to the appropriate authority for execution as provided by law. SIGNED thisthe 11* dayofAugust, 2004.

Smith County, Texas NOTICE OF APPEAL: 

### MANDATED BY TEXAS LAW from date ofJudgment ofDeath AUGUST 10, 2004.

iA>-V 10 1TAT2 HTiM? 10 YMJ03 li(jnuoD rttmtf *o litsO JJrtWO ..y-w* iwi •' s 2i Dfiiogsiot Mtt MM \MWJ lptoi»rt oo zwl

_______ 9061 IflV >-. hi.- -y. to «i)»o ynfli'sUI nofwo» biw to;•</>< ">« urtt 9ji«o toim» tm ta»i i«srtH> vf .'•-ww
'.r.x»T .#«»3 ftfwnZ tfWJ90. -y8