Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 3 / Thursday, January 4, 2024 / Notices 455 

1See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Administrative Review; 2021–2022, 

88 FR 43271 (July 7, 2023) (Preliminary Results), 

and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Chlorinated Isocynaurates from the 

People’s Republic of China; 2021–2022,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

3See Issues and Decision Memorandum for 

further discussion. 

4See Preliminary Results, 88 FR 43272. 

5See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

6For an explanation on the derivation of the 

China-wide rate, see Notice of Final Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Chlorinated 

Isocyanurates from the People’s Republic of China, 

70 FR 24502, 24505 (May 10, 2005). 

7See Certain Activated Carbon from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results and Partial 

Rescission of Second Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 75 FR 70208, 70211 

(November 17, 2010), and accompanying Issues and 

Decision Memorandum at Comment 3. 

8See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–898] 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd. (Heze 

Huayi) and Juancheng Kangtai Chemical 

Co., Ltd. (Kangtai) sold chlorinated 

isocyanurates (chlorinated isos) from 

the People’s Republic of China (China) 

at less than normal value during the 

period of review (POR) June 1, 2021, 

through May 31, 2022. 

DATES: Applicable January 4, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sean Carey, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

VII, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3964. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 7, 2023, Commerce published 

its Preliminary Results.1 For events 

subsequent to the Preliminary Results, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.2

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

chlorinated isos, which are derivatives 

of cyanuric acid, described as 

chlorinated s-triazine triones. A full 

description of the scope of the Order is 

contained in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised by interested parties 

in briefs are addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

issues addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is provided in 

the appendix to this notice. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://access.

trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our review of the record, 

and comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we made two changes to the 

Romanian surrogate values (SVs) for 

chlorine and brokerage and handling 

charges.3

Separate Rate Eligibility 

In the Preliminary Results, we found 

that Heze Huayi and Kangtai 

demonstrated their eligibility for 

separate rates.4 As we received no 

information or interested party 

arguments to the contrary since the 

issuance of the Preliminary Results, we 

continue to find that Heze Huayi and 

Kangtai are each eligible for a separate 

rate. 

China-Wide Entity 

Commerce’s policy regarding the 

conditional review of the China-wide 

entity applies to this administrative 

review.5 Under this policy, the Chinawide entity will not be under review 

unless a party specifically requests, or 

Commerce self-initiates, a review of the 

entity. Because no party requested a 

review of the China-wide entity, we did 

not review the entity in this segment of 

the proceeding. Thus, the China-wide 

entity’s rate (i.e., 285.63 percent) 6 did 

not change. 

Final Results of Review 

Commerce determines that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exists for Heze Huayi and 

Kangtai for the period of June 1, 2021, 

through May 31, 2022: 

Exporter 

Weightaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd ... 50.27 

Juancheng Kangtai Chemical 

Co., Ltd ................................... 73.84 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed to parties in this proceeding 

within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

has determined, and U.S Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with these final results of 

review. Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of these final results. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

For the individually-examined 

respondent in this review which has a 

final weighted-average dumping margin 

that is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less 

than 0.5 percent), we will calculate 

importer- (or customer-) specific perunit duty assessment rates based on the 

ratio of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the importer’s (or 

customer’s) examined sales to the total 

sales quantity associated with those 

sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).7 We will also calculate 

(estimated) ad valorem importerspecific assessment rates with which to 

determine whether the per-unit 

assessment rates are de minimis. Where 

either a respondent’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is zero or de minimis, 

or an importer- (or customer-) specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.8


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
456 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 3 / Thursday, January 4, 2024 / Notices 

1See Mattresses from Thailand: Final Affirmative 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 86 

FR 15928 (March 25, 2021) (Final Determination), 

and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum (IDM). 

2See Mattresses from Cambodia, Indonesia, 

Malaysia, Serbia, Thailand, the Republic of Turkey, 

and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determination for 

Cambodia, 86 FR 26460 (May 14, 2021) (Order). 

3The petitioners are: Brooklyn Bedding; 

Corsicana Mattress Company; Elite Comfort 

Solutions; FXI, Inc.; Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc.; 

Leggett & Platt, Incorporated; the International 

Brotherhood of Teamsters; and the United Steel, 

Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, 

Allied Industrial and Service Workers International 

Union, AFL–CIO (USW) (collectively, the 

petitioners). 

4See Brooklyn Bedding, LLC. v. United States, 

Court No. 21–00285, Slip Op. 23–107 (CIT July 20, 

2023). 

5 Id. at 12 and 14. 

6See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Court Remand, Brooklyn Bedding LLC, et al. v. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for the 

exporters listed above, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate established in the 

final results of this review (except, if the 

rate is zero or de minimis, a zero cash 

deposit rate will be required for that 

company); (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed China and nonChina exporters not listed above that 

have separate rates, the cash deposit rate 

will continue to be the existing 

producer/exporter-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

for all China exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be eligible for a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be the China-wide rate 

of 285.63 percent; and (4) for all nonChina exporters of subject merchandise 

that have not received their own rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the China exporter(s) that 

supplied that non-China exporter. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers Regarding the 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

and/or countervailing duties has 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties, and/or 

increase in the amount of antidumping 

duties by the amount of the 

countervailing duties. 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to an APO of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of administrative review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: December 28, 2023. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Comparable Merchandise 

Comment 2: Surrogate Country Selection 

Comment 3: Whether Romanian SV 

Information was Timely Submitted 

Comment 4: Whether the Romanian SV for 

Chlorine is Aberrant 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2023–28998 Filed 1–3–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–549–841] 

Mattresses From Thailand: Notice of 

Court Decision Not in Harmony With 

the Final Determination of 

Antidumping Investigation; Notice of 

Amended Final Determination; Notice 

of Amended Order, in Part 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 22, 2023, the 

U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) 

issued its final judgment in Brooklyn 

Bedding LLC v. United States, Court No. 

21–00285 sustaining the U.S. 

Department of Commerce’s (Commerce) 

first final results of redetermination 

pertaining to the antidumping duty (AD) 

investigation of mattresses from 

Thailand covering the period of 

investigation January 1, 2019, through 

December 31, 2019. Commerce is 

notifying the public that the CIT’s final 

judgment is not in harmony with 

Commerce’s final determination in the 

investigation, and Commerce is 

amending the final determination and 

the resulting AD order with respect to 

the dumping margins assigned to 

Saffron Living Co., Ltd. (Saffron) and all 

other producers and exporters of subject 

merchandise. 

DATES: Applicable January 1, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Paola Aleman Ordaz, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482-4031. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 25, 2021, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register its 

final determination in the AD 

investigation of mattresses from 

Thailand.1 Commerce subsequently 

published in the Federal Register the 

AD order on mattresses from Thailand.2

The petitioners 3 appealed 

Commerce’s Final Determination. On 

July 20, 2023, the CIT remanded the 

Final Determination to Commerce.4

Specifically, the CIT remanded 

Commerce to: (1) undertake verification 

of Saffron in accordance with section 

782(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act), insofar as Commerce 

continued to rely upon the company’s 

data; and (2) explain why Commerce 

departed from its practice of applying 

the transactions disregarded and/or 

major unput rules or, alternatively, to 

apply either or both of those rules.5

In its final results of redetermination, 

issued on September 18, 2023, 

Commerce applied adverse facts 

available (AFA) to Saffron because the 

company withdrew from the remand 

proceeding, and thus, Commerce could 

neither verify Saffron’s sales or cost 

data, nor apply the transactions 

disregarded and/or major input rules to 

its data.6 As a result, Commerce 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES