alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001

Commission file number 333-61783

Bear Stearns Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1999-C1
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of  incorporation or organization)

3411414
(I.R.S. Employer  Identification No.)

245 Park Avenue, New York, New York
(Address of principal executive offices)

10167
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (212) 272-2000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
           Yes [X]       No  [ ]

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A amends item 14 of the original Form 10-K
which was filed on March XX, 2002.


      Item 14.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.

	(a)	Exhibits

		(99.1)	Annual Independent Accountant's Servicing Report

		(99.2)	Report of Management on Compliance with Minimum Servicing
			Standards

		(99.3)	Annual Statement of Compliance

	(b) 	Reports on Form 8-K were filed during the last quarter of 2001 in
		order to provide statements for the monthly distributions to investors
		on September 27, 2001, October 23, 2001, November 21, 2001 and
		December 20, 2001.





				SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LaSalle Bank National Association, in its
capacity as Trustee under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement on behalf of
Bear Stearns Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1999-C1
(Registrant)


By:	/s/  	Cynthia Reis
	---------------------------
		Cynthia Reis
		First Vice President

Date:	June 19, 2002
**Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 March 2010 – Monoscoop v OHIM (SUDOKU SAMURAI BINGO)**

**(Case T-564/08)**

Community trade mark – Application for Community word mark SUDOKU SAMURAI BINGO – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications which may serve to designate the characteristics of goods (Council Regulation
No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 18, 28, 35)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 September 2008 (Case R 816/2008‐2) concerning an application for registration of the word mark SUDOKU SAMURAI BINGO as a Community trade mark. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Monoscoop BV |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark SUDOKU SAMURAI BINGO for goods and services in Classes 9, 28 and 41 – application No 5769013 |
| Decision of the Examiner: | Application dismissed |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Monoscoop BV to pay the costs. |
# C_2008313EN.01005301.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/53

---

Action brought on 10 October 2008 — Commission v Acentro Turismo

(Case T-460/08)

(2008/C 313/94)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Aresu, A. Caeiros, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Acentro Turismo SpA (Milan, Italy)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | order Acentro Turismo SpA to pay the sum of EUR 13 497,46 by way of capital; |
| --- | --- |

—

order Acentro Turismo SpA to pay the sum of EUR 13 497,46 by way of capital;

| — | order that company to pay the sum of EUR 2 278,55 in default interest payable up to the date of lodging of the present application, and default interest which will be payable after the date of lodging of this application up to the date of the actual payment of the capital, to be quantified ultimately on the basis of the interest rate established by Italian law; |
| --- | --- |

—

order that company to pay the sum of EUR 2 278,55 in default interest payable up to the date of lodging of the present application, and default interest which will be payable after the date of lodging of this application up to the date of the actual payment of the capital, to be quantified ultimately on the basis of the interest rate established by Italian law;

| — | order that company to pay default interest on the aforesaid interest payable up to the date of lodging of the present application, to be quantified ultimately on the basis of the interest rate established by Italian law; |
| --- | --- |

—

order that company to pay default interest on the aforesaid interest payable up to the date of lodging of the present application, to be quantified ultimately on the basis of the interest rate established by Italian law;

| — | order that company to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that company to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the present application the European Commission, as representative of the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom), asks the Court to order the company incorporated under Italian law, Acentro Turismo SpA, to pay the sum of EUR 13 497,46, plus default interest, owed on the basis of the rules relating to performance laid down by contract No 349-90-04 TL ISP I for the provision of services, concluded in 1990 and intended to give that company the functions of travel agent on the Ispra site.

The Commission submits in that regard that Acentro did not honour two invoices, issued by the Commission itself on the basis of Article 8 of the contested contract, and that the existence of that credit is sufficiently proven with regard to the content of that contract and the credit in question is therefore irrefutable, liquid and collectable.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 12.1

 Hanover Compressor Company Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

            (Amounts in thousands of dollars, except ratio amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Years Ended December 31,
                                                          ----------------------------------------------
                                                           2002(1)    2001      2000      1999     1998
                                                          --------  --------  --------  -------  -------
<S>                                                       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>      <C>
Earnings:
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income
  taxes.................................................. $(92,419) $112,000  $ 74,948  $60,463  $49,636
Add:
Interest on indebtedness and amortization of capitalized
  interest, debt expense and discount (2)................   43,698    24,164    15,110    9,115   11,716
Leasing expense and the estimated interest factor
  attributable to rents..................................   96,863    71,347    46,132   22,486    6,310
Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates in excess
  of distributions of income.............................   (2,223)   (9,350)   (3,518)  (1,188)  (1,369)
                                                          --------  --------  --------  -------  -------
   Earnings as adjusted.................................. $ 45,919  $198,161  $132,672  $90,876  $66,293
                                                          ========  ========  ========  =======  =======
Fixed charges:
Interest on indebtedness, amortization of debt expense
  and discount and capitalized interest (2).............. $ 45,822  $ 26,654  $ 16,871  $10,597  $11,716
Leasing expense and the estimated interest factor
  attributable to rents..................................   96,863    71,347    46,132   22,486    6,310
                                                          --------  --------  --------  -------  -------
   Total fixed charges................................... $142,685  $ 98,001  $ 63,003  $33,083  $18,026
                                                          ========  ========  ========  =======  =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.......................       --      2.02      2.11     2.75     3.68
                                                          ========  ========  ========  =======  =======
</TABLE>
--------
(1) Due to Hanover's loss for the year ended December 31, 2002, the ratio
    coverage was less than 1:1. Hanover must generate additional pre-tax
    earnings of $96.8 million to achieve a coverage of 1:1. During 2002, the
    Company recorded $182.7 million in pre-tax charges. See Note 27 of the
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Form 10-K.
(2) Includes distributions on mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred
    securities.

                                      1
County Economic Status in Appalachia, Fiscal Year 2015

(Effective October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015)

The Appalachian Regional Commission uses an index-based county 

economic classification system to identify and monitor the economic 

status of Appalachian counties. See the reverse side for a description of 

each economic level.

Map Created: March 2014

Data Sources:

Unemployment data: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, LAUS, 2010–2012

Income data: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2012

Poverty data: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2008–2012

0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

Distressed (90)

At-Risk (108)

Transitional (210)

Competitive (10)

County Economic Levels

Attainment (2)
County Economic Status Classification System, FY 2015

The Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) uses an index-based county economic classification system to 

identify and monitor the economic status of Appalachian counties. The system involves the creation of a 

national index of county economic status through a comparison of each county’s averages for three economic 

indicators—three-year average unemployment rate, per capita market income, and poverty rate—with national 

averages. The resulting values are summed and averaged to create a composite index value for each county. 

Each county in the nation is then ranked, based on its composite index value, with higher values indicating 

higher levels of distress.

County Economic Levels

Each Appalachian county is classified into one of five economic status designations, based on its position in the 

national ranking. 

Distressed

Distressed counties are the most economically depressed counties. They rank in the worst 10 percent of the 

nation’s counties.

At-Risk

At-Risk counties are those at risk of becoming economically distressed. They rank between the worst 10 percent 

and 25 percent of the nation’s counties.

Transitional

Transitional counties are those transitioning between strong and weak economies. They make up the largest 

economic status designation. Transitional counties rank between the worst 25 percent and the best 25 percent of 

the nation’s counties.

Competitive

Competitive counties are those that are able to compete in the national economy but are not in the highest 10 

percent of the nation’s counties. Counties ranking between the best 10 percent and 25 percent of the nation’s 

counties are classified competitive.

Attainment

Attainment counties are the economically strongest counties. Counties ranking in the best 10 percent of the 

nation’s counties are classified attainment.

Attainment 

Counties

Best 10% of 

U.S. Counties

Competitive 

Counties

Best 10+ to 25% of 

U.S. Counties

At-Risk 

Counties

Worst 10+ to 25% 

of U.S. Counties

Distressed 

Counties

Worst 10%

 of U.S. 

Counties

ARC County Economic Status Designation by National Index Value Rank

Ranked Index Values 

of U.S. Counties

Transitional Counties

Higher Index Values Lower Index Values
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                                                    Exhibit 27.1

<ARTICLE>                                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's Financial  Statements for the period ending December 31, 1997 included
in the  Company's  Form  10-KSB  filed March 13,  1998 and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such statements 
                                      E-3
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                          6,204
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   3,763
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      490
<INVENTORY>                                                     3,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               14,835
<PP&E>                                                          3,974
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  3,036
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 18,926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           4,019
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       28,955
<OTHER-SE>                                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   18,926
<SALES>                                                        25,343
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               25,343
<CGS>                                                          11,836
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  11,836
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    7
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               (288)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (7,627)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     (732)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            (6,895)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (6,895)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   (1.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (1.54)


        


</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION F OR E N B ANC R E CONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: In re Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay

Appellate case number: 01

- 2 2

- 00 427

- C V

Trial court case number: 2021

- 43287

Trial court: 157th District Court

Date motion filed : Ju ly 8 , 2022

Party filing motion: Relators

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP . P.

49.7

. All pending motions are overruled as moot.

Judge’s signature:

_____

/s/ Sherry Radack

______ Acting for the Court

En banc Court consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman , Landau, Hightower

, Countiss, Rivas

- Molloy, Guerra

, and F a rris

.

Date: ____ August 2, 2022

_____
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6101]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     OVARIAN CANCER AWARENESS MONTH

  Ms. KLOBUCHAR. Mr. President, I rise to express my support for women 
and families affected by ovarian cancer. In 2012, it is estimated that 
approximately 22,280 women will be diagnosed with ovarian cancer and 
15,500 will die of the disease. In my State of Minnesota, an estimated 
260 women will die from ovarian cancer this year. Too many American 
women--sisters, daughters, nieces, wives, friends, neighbors, and 
coworkers--are losing their lives to this disease.
  Because no ovarian cancer screening or early detection test exists, 
organizations such as the Ovarian Cancer National Alliance stress that 
``until there's a test, awareness is best.'' I commend the Ovarian 
Cancer National Alliance for its steadfast commitment to make women 
aware of the risk factors, signs, and symptoms of ovarian cancer and 
for its advocacy on behalf of women and families touched by this 
devastating disease. I also would like to commend the Ovarian Cancer 
National Alliance's Partner Member groups in my State, including the 
Minnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance, which is one of the largest funders 
of research for ovarian cancer in the country.
  Experts recommend that women see a gynecologist if they experience 
any of the often subtle symptoms of ovarian cancer daily for more than 
a few weeks. Four major symptoms of ovarian cancer include bloating, 
pelvic or abdominal pain, difficulty eating or feeling full quickly, 
and frequent or urgent need to urinate. I ask all of my colleagues to 
become familiar with these symptoms and to share the information with 
their friends, family, staff, and constituents.
  Ovarian cancer is the ninth most common cancer among women and the 
fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths, making it the deadliest 
of gynecologic cancers. If ovarian cancer is treated before it has 
spread outside the ovary, the 5-year survival rate is 93 percent. 
Currently, only 15 percent of ovarian cancers are found at such an 
early stage and overall the relative 5-year survival rate is 46 
percent. I urge my colleagues to help make women aware of the potential 
warning signs to prevent future deaths. Experts acknowledge that 
symptoms can be vague and may be associated with other medical 
conditions. However, as the saying goes, it is better to be safe than 
sorry.
  September is National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month--an important 
time during which ovarian cancer organizations, advocates, and others 
will be helping to raise awareness about the disease and its symptoms. 
I urge my colleagues and their staff to join me in recognizing 
September as National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month and to join with 
us in wearing teal throughout September to increase public knowledge 
about this deadly disease.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1482]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  HONORING PEGGY COMBS' PROMOTION TO BRIGADIER GENERAL IN THE UNITED 
                              STATES ARMY

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. RICHARD L. HANNA

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                      Tuesday, September 11, 2012

  Mr. HANNA. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize Peggy Combs on her 
promotion to Brigadier General in the United States Army.
  Brigadier General Combs is the commandant of the U.S. Army Chemical, 
Biological, Radiological and Nuclear School at Fort Leonard Wood, MO. 
The change of command ceremony was streamed live to her hometown 
American Legion, R.K. Parkhurst Post 1448 in Oriskany, NY, where both 
she and her parents are members. Approximately 1,400 members of the 
community gathered to watch the ceremony.
  Brigadier General Combs is the first female general officer to hail 
from the upstate New York community, and is the first general with ties 
to Oriskany since Gen. Nicholas Herkimer, who led local militia during 
the famed battle of Oriskany during the Revolutionary War.
  Brigadier General Combs is the eldest of Jack and Pat Huther's four 
children and is a 1981 graduate of Oriskany Central School. Brigadier 
General Combs was the first member of her family to go to college. In 
1985, she graduated from the esteemed Syracuse University and received 
her direct commission as a second lieutenant through the university's 
Army ROTC program, where she was a distinguished military graduate. 
Together with her husband Brad, they have raised three grown children. 
Brigadier General Combs stands as a role model for women and female 
soldiers throughout the United States of America. Only in America can a 
young girl from rural upstate New York climb the ranks of the best Army 
in the world.
  Mr. Speaker, on behalf of Congress and the United States of America, 
I would like to recognize Brigadier General Peggy Combs on her 
promotion in the United States Army. Brigadier General Combs has been 
an asset not only to the United States Army but to the people of New 
York State and certainly Oneida County and her hometown of Oriskany. It 
is an honor and a privilege to applaud Brigadier General Combs' 
promotion and I wish her great success as she continues her upward 
journey in the United States Army.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6004]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    CONSTITUTION AND CITIZENSHIP DAY

  (Mr. CUMMINGS asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mr. CUMMINGS. Mr. Speaker, this fall we will walk to voting booths in 
every community across this Nation to elect our leaders. Our right to 
vote is one of many rights guaranteed by our Constitution. Yet every 
election cycle, millions of young Americans fail to exercise this 
right, often because they do not realize the importance of doing so.
  On September 17, we will celebrate the 225th anniversary of the 
signing of our Nation's Constitution. To mark that momentous 
anniversary, this week I introduced the Constitution and Citizenship 
Day Act of 2012, H.R. 6390.
  This bill would support expanded education about our Constitution by 
enabling high school students to organize special events to mark 
Constitution and Citizenship Day.
  Our young people should be given every opportunity to learn what our 
democracy means and to partake in it. The Congress is the living 
embodiment of our Constitution's provisions. I invite all Members on 
both sides of the aisle to join me in cosponsoring this legislation to 
ensure that future generations understand their rights, duties, and 
responsibilities.

                          ____________________
```