alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

# ACTION:

Notice of availability; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Labor (DOL) is correcting a notice that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on December 6, 2023. After publication of the notice, the DOL discovered that the synopsis of the Information Collection Request (ICR) provided in the                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         section incorrectly summarized the subject matter of the collection. DOL is issuing this correction to provide the correct synopsis.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Michelle Neary by telephone at 202-693-6312, or by email at                         *DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In FR. Doc. 2023-26748 appearing at 88 FR 84834 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of Wednesday, December 6, 2023, on page 84834, in the second column, the following correction is made:                

                    1. In the                     **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                     section, correct the first paragraph to read as follows: This form is used by current, or occasionally former, Federal employees to claim wage loss or medical treatment resulting from a recurrence of a work-related injury while Federally employed. The information is necessary to ensure the accurate payment of benefits. For additional substantive information about this ICR, see the related notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August, 7, 2023 (88 FR 52214).                

Michelle Neary,

Senior PRA Analyst.

[FR Doc. 2023-28219 Filed 12-21-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-CH-P
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4765 

To amend the Arms Export Control Act to prohibit the removal of certain 

items under category I, II, or III of the United States Munitions List 

for purposes of transferring the item to or controlling the item under 

any portion of the Commerce Control List of dual-use items in the 

Export Administration Regulations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2018 

Mrs. TORRES (for herself, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. MCGOVERN, and Ms. 

GABBARD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Arms Export Control Act to prohibit the 

removal of certain items under category I, II, or III 

of the United States Munitions List for purposes of 

transferring the item to or controlling the item under 

any portion of the Commerce Control List of dual-use 

items in the Export Administration Regulations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prevent Crime and 

5 Terrorism Act of 2018’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4765 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REMOVAL OF CERTAIN ITEMS 

2 UNDER CATEGORIES I, II, AND III OF THE 

3 UNITED STATES MUNITIONS LIST. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 38(f)(1) of the Arms Ex5 port Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778(f)(1)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘(f)(1) The President’’ and in7 serting ‘‘(f)(1)(A) The President’’; 

8 (2) in the third sentence, by striking ‘‘The 

9 President’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to subparagraph 

10 (B), the President’’; and 

11 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(B)(i) The President may not remove any item de13 scribed in clause (ii) for purposes of transferring the item 

14 to or controlling the item under any portion of the Com15 merce Control List of dual-use items in the Export Admin16 istration Regulations (as such term is defined by sub17 section (k)(3)). 

18 ‘‘(ii) The items described in this clause are items in19 cluded in category I, II, or III of the United States Muni20 tions List, as in effect on January 10, 2017, and des21 ignated as— 

22 ‘‘(I) significant military equipment; 

23 ‘‘(II) components, parts, accessories, or attach24 ments of significant military equipment; 

25 ‘‘(III) flame throwers specifically designed or 

26 modified for military application; or 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4765 IH

1 ‘‘(IV) apparatus or devices for launching or de2 livering ordnance.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 subsection (a) take effect on the date of the enactment 

5 of this Act and apply with respect to items controlled 

6 under category I, II, or III of the United States Munitions 

7 List on or after such date of enactment. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

A high school completion rate is the percentage of persons ages 

25 and over with a high school diploma or more. The percent of the 

U.S. average is computed by dividing the county high school 

completion rate by the national average and multiplying by 100. 

The map uses critical breaks such as the national average to 

organize the data into groups of common values.

Map Created: July 2018

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2012–2016

0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

67.2% - 74.9%

75.0% - 84.9%

85.0% - 99.9%

100.0% - 108.7%

Percent of the U.S. Average

(Critical Breaks Classification)

U.S. average = 87.0%

Appalachian average = 85.9%
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         177,283
<SECURITIES>                                 2,067,136
<RECEIVABLES>                                  379,655
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,624,074
<PP&E>                                         793,583
<DEPRECIATION>                                (476,150)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,941,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,273,526
<BONDS>                                      2,733,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,066,219)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,941,507
<SALES>                                        247,762
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               247,762
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               666,913
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (419,151)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (419,151)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.192)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.192)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

D.G., FATHER OF D.L., A CHILD,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D18-1049

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND 

FAMILIES,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 15, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Volusia County, 

Stasia Warren, Judge. 

Ryan Thomas Truskoski, of Ryan 

Thomas Truskoski, P.A., Orlando, for 

Appellant.

Ward L. Metzger, Appellate Counsel, 

Children’s Legal Services, Department of 

Children and Families, Jacksonville, for 

Appellee. 

Thomasina Moore, Statewide Director of 

Appeals, and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, 

Appellate Counsel, Guardian ad Litem 

Program, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad 

Litem. 
2

PER CURIAM.

D.G. appeals the order terminating his parental rights to D.L. We affirm. The 

record supports the trial court’s findings that the Department of Children and Families 

(“DCF”) proved, by clear and convincing evidence, a ground for termination pursuant to 

section 39.806(1)(d)(3), Florida Statutes (2017).1 Because DCF was required to prove 

only one statutory ground for termination, we do not need to address whether the trial 

court correctly relied on other grounds for termination.2 See § 39.802(4)(a), Fla. Stat. 

(2017); S.D. v. Dep’t of Child. & Fam. Servs., 80 So. 3d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).

AFFIRMED. 

COHEN, C.J., and TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

 

1 Section 39.806(1)(d)(3) provides that grounds for termination of parental rights 

may be established where the court determines by clear and convincing evidence “that 

continuing the parental relationship with the incarcerated parent would be harmful to the 

child and, for this reason, that termination of parental rights of an incarcerated parent is 

in the best interest of the child.” 

2 We recognize that DCF conceded that some of the statutory grounds relied upon 

by the trial court for termination were not supported by the evidence.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 119 (Tuesday, August 7, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1447]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  HONORING AMERICAN OLYMPIAN KIM RHODE

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. MIKE THOMPSON

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                        Tuesday, August 7, 2012

  Mr. THOMPSON of California. Mr. Speaker, I along with Representative 
Chu rise today in honor and celebration of American Olympian Kim Rhode, 
who became the first American to earn an individual medal in five 
straight Olympic Games following her gold-medal performance on July 29 
in the women's skeet shooting event in London.
  A native of California, Rhode has been competing in trap and skeet 
shooting events since she was a child. She won a gold medal in her 
first Olympics as a teenager--in the 1996 Atlanta Games--and has since 
earned bronze in Sydney (2000) and gold in Athens (2004), all in the 
trap event. She also won a silver medal in the 2008 Beijing skeet 
competition. This accomplishment makes her just the 8th U.S. woman 
Olympian to have won at least five medals in individual competitions.
  With her near-perfect score, Rhode set an Olympic record last Sunday, 
hitting 99 of a possible 100 targets, tying the highest mark ever 
achieved in skeet-style competition. She scored perfect 25-of-25 
figures in the first two rounds of competition, ending her streak at 65 
made shots when she had her first and only miss in the third round. 
Rhode closed out the final round with another perfect 25, finishing 
eight shots ahead of the first runner-up.
  A model athlete and competitor, Rhode's consistency and persistence 
have defined her career and its success. Though she remains a tough 
competitor at age 33, Rhode has stayed family-oriented and remarkably 
balanced for an athlete of her caliber. She shoots for fun with her 
husband, Mike Harryman, and her principal coach and trainer is still 
her father, Richard; her mother, Sharon, helps to manage a schedule 
filled with sponsorship obligations and speaking engagements. Despite 
all her successes, those closest to Rhode say she remains passionate 
about the sport for the best of reasons--her own personal enjoyment.
  Mr. Speaker, it is appropriate at this time that we congratulate and 
praise Kim Rhode's accomplishments thus far, and wish her the best in 
future competitions. She is a role-model for young athletes in America 
and across the globe, and she is deserving of our most honorable 
recognition.

                          ____________________
```
#### Jackie JONES, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12626.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Oct. 15, 1958.

Ralph'A. Myers, Jr., El Reno, for plaintiff in error.

Harry Lorenzon, County Atty., El Reno, Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

NIX, Judge.

Jackie Jones, plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant was charged by information with the crime of perjury in the District Court of Canadian County. He was tried before a jury, found guilty. The jury, being unable to agree upon the punishment, left the same the trial judge who sentenced the defendant to serve three years in the state penitentiary.

The defendant lodged his appeal in this court on the 26th day of May, 1958. No briefs were filed during the required period of time nor was an extension of time requested. The case was set for oral argument September 10, 1958. No one appeared in behalf of the defendant to present argument and the case was thereupon submitted on the record.

*1056■ This court has adhered closely to the rule as stated in Hulsey v. State, 82 Okl.Cr. 332, 169 P.2d 771:

> “Where the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and no briefs are filed nor argument presented, this court will examine the evidence and ascertain if it supports the verdict, and will make an examination of the information, instructions excepted to, and the judgment, and if no material error is apparent, the judgment will be affirmed.”

In compliance with this rule we have found no error which would justify reversal.

The record reflects that defendant was charged with perjury after testifying in District Court in a case wherein one Bob Freels was convicted of rape. The defendant, who was 16 years of age, had been in the company of the prosecutrix and Bob Freels at the time of the alleged rape. After Freels and this defendant were taken into custody after the alleged rape, defendant herein made a sworn statement before a notary in the county attorney’s office. During the course of the trial, the defendant’s testimony was contrary to the sworn statement in several instances. This testimony being related in Freels v. State, Okl.Cr., 320 P.2d 731, it is unnecessary to reiterate it herein.

The testimony herein shows that the defendant lived with a widowed mother; his father died when he was about 12 years old, and his mother works as a waitress to support her household. That the defendant, who is now 18, works as a carpenter and helps his mother.

The record shows defendant has had no previous record except one traffic violation. At the time of the alleged perjury the defendant was 17 years of age. In view of all the circumstances, the tender years, the first offense, this court feels that justice would be best served by reducing the sentence from three years to two years in the Oklahoma State Penitentiary.

It is therefore ordered and otherwise affirmed.

BRETT, P. J., and POWELL, J., concur.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5858]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              ADJOURNMENT

  Mr. TONKO. Mr. Speaker, I move that the House do now adjourn.
  The motion was agreed to; accordingly (at 8 o'clock and 55 minutes 
p.m.), under its previous order, the House adjourned until tomorrow, 
Wednesday, September 12, 2012, at 10 a.m. for morning-hour debate.

                          ____________________
```
# Avery - Appalachian Regional Commission

- High Country Council of Governments Executive Director Julie Wiggins Email  &#106;&#x77;i&#103;&#x67;i&#110;&#x73;&#64;&#104;&#x63;c&#111;&#x67;&#46;&#111;&#x72;gThe post High Country Council of Governments appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

            Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries
                       Computation of Earnings Per Share
          (Dollars and Share Data in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    As of and For the Years Ended December 31,
                                                                    ------------------------------------------
                                                                        2003          2002          2001
                                                                      ---------     ---------     ---------
<S>                                                                   <C>           <C>           <C>
Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding                               21,909        21,611        16,529

Weighted-Average Share Equivalents Outstanding                              751           682           656
                                                                      ---------     ---------     ---------

Weighted-Average Shares and Share Equivalents Outstanding                22,660        22,293        17,185
                                                                      =========     =========     =========

Net Income                                                            $  60,277     $  36,005     $  30,559
                                                                      =========     =========     =========

Basic Earnings Per Share                                              $    2.75     $    1.67     $    1.85
                                                                      =========     =========     =========

Diluted Earnings Per Share                                            $    2.66     $    1.62     $    1.78
                                                                      =========     =========     =========
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6284]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR

  Mr. UDALL of Colorado. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that 
Andrea Chapman, Claire Green, Sarah Weaver, Sterling Laudon, Owen 
Haacke, James Mathis, and Joseph Steffens, staff of the Finance 
Committee, be granted the privilege of the floor for the remainder of 
the 112th Congress.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so 
ordered.
  Mr. LIEBERMAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that Robert 
Morus, an intern in the office of the Senator from Oregon, be granted 
the privilege of the floor for the balance of the day.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 23.1

 

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Forms S-8 Nos. 333-116834, 333-100309, 333-72466, 333-64054, 333-38346,333-66347, 333-20549 and Form S-3 No. 333-118406) of Wild Oats Markets, Inc., of ourreport dated April 29, 2005, with respect to Wild Oats Markets Inc.’s management'sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Wild Oats Markets, Inc.,included in this Form 10-K/A.

 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Denver, Colorado

April 29, 2005**
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1122 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1122

    To provide that chapter 1 of title 9 of the United States Code, 
relating to the enforcement of arbitration agreements, shall not apply 
to enrollment agreements made between students and certain institutions 
  of higher education, and to prohibit limitations on the ability of 
   students to pursue claims against certain institutions of higher 
                               education.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 28, 2015

   Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Brown, Mrs. Boxer, and Mr. Franken) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide that chapter 1 of title 9 of the United States Code, 
relating to the enforcement of arbitration agreements, shall not apply 
to enrollment agreements made between students and certain institutions 
  of higher education, and to prohibit limitations on the ability of 
   students to pursue claims against certain institutions of higher 
                               education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Court Legal Access and Student 
Support (CLASS) Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. INAPPLICABILITY OF CHAPTER 1 OF TITLE 9, UNITED STATES CODE, TO 
              ENROLLMENT AGREEMENTS MADE BETWEEN STUDENTS AND CERTAIN 
              INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 1 of title 9 of the United States Code 
(relating to the enforcement of arbitration agreements) shall not apply 
to an enrollment agreement made between a student and an institution of 
higher education.
    (b) Definition.--In this section, the term ``institution of higher 
education'' has the meaning given such term in section 102 of the 
Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002).

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON LIMITATIONS ON ABILITY OF STUDENTS TO PURSUE 
              CLAIMS AGAINST CERTAIN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION.

    Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1094(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(30) The institution will not require any student to 
        agree to, and will not enforce, any limitation or restriction 
        (including a limitation or restriction on any available choice 
        of applicable law, a jury trial, or venue) on the ability of a 
        student to pursue a claim, individually or with others, against 
        an institution in court.''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect 1 
year after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```