alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010134EN.01000702.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Gent — Belgium) — Erotic Center BVBA v Belgische Staat

(Case C-3/09) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Article 12(3)(a) - Annexe H - Reduced rate of VAT - Concept of admissions to a cinema - Individual cubicles for watching films on demand)

2010/C 134/11

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Erotic Center BVBA

Applicant:

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hof van Beroep te Gent — Interpretation of Annex H, Category 7 of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1)(now Annex III, No. 7 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — Reduced rate applicable to certain supplies of goods and services — Cinemas — Meaning — Individual cubicle for viewing films on demand

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The concept of admissions to a cinema referred to in the first paragraph of Category 7 in Annex H to Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 2001/4/EC of 19 January 2001, must be interpreted as meaning that it does not cover the payment made by a customer so as to be able to watch on his own one or more films, or extracts from films, in private cubicles such as those in issue in the main proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 4.4.2009.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6336]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      MESSAGES FROM THE PRESIDENT

  Messages from the President of the United States were communicated to 
the Senate by Mr. McCathran, one of his secretaries.

                          ____________________
```
### combustionsurvey

- Supplemental Submission of Information on Major Source Boiler Rule

Please find attached additional data and informatio n to inform EPA’s proposed reconsideration of the M ajor Source Boiler Rule as requested by Federal Register notice issued May 18, 2011 (76 Fed. Reg. 96 at 286 62-64) and submitted on behalf of Eco Power Solutions (USA ) Corp.

We thank EPA for the opportunity to submit these da ta.

Norman W. Bernstein, Member N.W. Bernstein & Associates, LLC 800 Westchester Avenue, N319 Rye Brook, NY 10573 (914) 358-3500 Web Site: www.nwbllc.com

In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circula r 230, any discussion of a federal tax issue in thi s communication or in any attachment is not intended to be used, and it cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties.

This message may contain confidential information t hat is protected by the attorney- client privilege or otherwise. If you are not the i ntended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distrib ution, or taking of action in reliance on the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received th is message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-ma il and delete the original message. Thank you. 

### From: Norm Bernstein <nwbernstein@nwbllc.com> To: <combustionsurvey@erg.com> Date: 7/14/2011 2:00 PM Subject: Supplemental Submission of Information on Major Source Boiler Rule Attachments: Supplemental Submission of Information on Major Source Boiler Rule7

- 14

- 11.pdf Page 1 of 1

8/2/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpw ise\4E1EF681DO

...
ANTHONY RAY PERKINS

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF F ILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 0526

Opinion filed June 8, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

James Max Kennedy, of Bires, Schaffer and DeBorde, Houston, Texas; Donald B.

Mairs, Jacksonville , for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, A ttorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
# C_2009233EN.01001601.xml

| 26.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/16

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 9 July 2009 — infeurope v Commission

(Case T-188/08) (1)

1

(Action for declaration of failure to act, for annulment and for damages - Public service contracts - Call for tenders concerning consultancy, audit and study services for OHIM - Administrative appeal before the Commission - Implied Commission decision to dismiss - New claims - Connection between the action for a declaration of failure to act and the action for damages - Manifest inadmissibility)

2009/C 233/28

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: infeurope (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: O. Mader, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Bambara and E. Manhaeve, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, APPLICATION for a declaration that the Commission failed to act in that it unlawfully failed to annul the decision to award framework contracts following the call for tenders procedure AO/026/06 of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) for the provision of consultancy services, audits and studies, and to terminate the specific contracts concluded under those framework contracts and, in the alternative, APPLICATION for annulment of the alleged implied decision of the Commission to dismiss the applicant’s administrative appeal of 13 December 2007 in the context of that tendering procedure and, secondly, APPLICATION for compensation for the harm allegedly suffered as a result of the alleged unlawful omissions on the part of the Commission.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | infeurope is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

infeurope is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, of 5.7.2008.

1

---
# FY 2021 - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Appalachian Region FY 2021 Investments The post Appalachian Region FY 2021 Investments appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Alabama FY 2021 Investments The post Alabama FY 2021 Investments appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Georgia FY 2021 Investments The post Georgia FY 2021 Investments appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Kentucky FY 2021 Investments The post Kentucky FY 2021 Investments appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Maryland FY 2021 Investments The post Maryland FY 2021 Investments appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Mississippi FY 2021 Investments The post Mississippi FY 2021 Investments appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- New York FY 2021 Investments The post New York FY 2021 Investments appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- North Carolina FY 2021 Investments The post North Carolina FY 2021 Investments appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Ohio FY 2021 Investments The post Ohio FY 2021 Investments appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Pennsylvania FY 2021 Investments The post Pennsylvania FY 2021 Investments appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132138 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132138 

 COA: 267845 

Barry CC: 03-100230-FH 

03-100306-FH 

DEANDREA SHAWN FREEMAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 2, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2006 

 Clerk
#### C. D. MAYES et al., Plaintiff in Error, v. Vernon FLOURNOY, Defendant in Error.

No. 36389.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Nov. 23, 1954.

Miller & Miller, Tahlequah, for plaintiffs in error.

C. F. Bliss, Jr., Tahlequah, for defendant in error.

CORN, Justice.

The defendants below, C. D. Mayes et al., have appealed from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Vernon Flour-noy and on April 27, 19S4, filed their brief. The authorities cited therein reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The plaintiff below has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances as stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okl. 273, 21 P.2d 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the judgment but the same may be vacated with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded to the trial court with directions to vacate the judgment entered for plaintiff and to enter judgment for defendants.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, dated the date of this Certification (the Report), I, Craig F. Fortin, the Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2010 |  |  |  | /S/    CRAIG F.
FORTIN                           
|                     |  |  |  | Craig F. Fortin                                  
|                     |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



84
Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

A college completion rate is the percentage of persons ages 25 

and over with a bachelor’s degree or more. The percent of the 

U.S. average is computed by dividing the county college 

completion rate by the national average and multiplying by 100. 

The map uses critical breaks such as the national average to 

organize the data into groups of common values.

Map Created: August 2019

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2013–2017

0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

15.8% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.9%

100.0% - 170.1%

Percent of the U.S. Average

(Critical Breaks Classification)

U.S. average = 30.9%

Appalachian average = 23.7%
Opinion issued July 16, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-24-00011-CV

———————————

JUSTIN FRANCIS, Appellant

V.

SASOL CHEMICALS (USA), LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2023-06561

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Justin Francis has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this

interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order granting appellee The Kansas City 
2

Southern Railway Company’s special appearance.

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2), 

42.1(a)(1). No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss 

the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Landau, Countiss, and Guerra.

1 The motion to dismiss states that Francis has nonsuited his claims against The 

Kansas City Southern Railway Company—one of two entities he sued in the 

underlying proceedings. The other entity sued by Francis—Sasol Chemicals (USA), 

LLC—is not before the Court in this interlocutory appeal.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO § 906OF****THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350)**
     The undersigned, as the Executive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of Allied Holdings, Inc.,certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, theAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2003, which accompanies this certificationfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the informationcontained in the periodic report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Allied Holdings, Inc. at the dates and forthe periods indicated. The foregoing certification is madepursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied uponfor any other purpose.
     This 13th day of April, 2004.
 /s/ DAVID A. RAWDEN      David A. Rawden     *Executive Vice President and* *Chief Financial Officer*
A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided toAllied Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by AlliedHoldings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
The information in this Exhibit 32.2 shallnot be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall itbe deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forthby specific reference in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 5 (Monday, January 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Interest Rate Paid on Cash Deposited To Secure U.S. Immigration 
and Customs Enforcement Immigration Bonds

AGENCY: Departmental Offices, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: For the period beginning January 1, 2024, and ending on March 
31, 2024, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Immigration Bond 
interest rate is 3 per centum per annum.

DATES: Rates are applicable January 1, 2024, to March 31, 2024.

ADDRESSES: Comments or inquiries may be mailed to Will Walcutt, 
Supervisor, Funds Management Branch, Funds Management Division, Fiscal 
Accounting, Bureau of the Fiscal Services, Parkersburg, West Virginia 
26106-1328.
    You can download this notice at the following internet addresses: 
<http://www.treasury.gov> or <http://www.federalregister.gov>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Hanna, Manager, Funds Management 
Branch, Funds Management Division, Fiscal Accounting, Bureau of the 
Fiscal Service, Parkersburg, West Virginia 261006-1328 (304) 480-5120; 
Will Walcutt, Supervisor, Funds Management Branch, Funds Management 
Division, Fiscal Accounting, Bureau of the Fiscal Services, 
Parkersburg, West Virginia 26106-1328, (304) 480-5117.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal law requires that interest payments 
on cash deposited to secure immigration bonds shall be ``at a rate 
determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, except that in no case 
shall the interest rate exceed 3 per centum per annum.'' 8 U.S.C. 
1363(a). Related Federal regulations state that ``Interest on cash 
deposited to secure immigration bonds will be at the rate as determined 
by the Secretary of the Treasury, but in no case will exceed 3 per 
centum per annum or be less than zero.'' 8 CFR 293.2. Treasury has 
determined that interest on the bonds will vary quarterly and will 
accrue during each calendar quarter at a rate equal to the lesser of 
the average of the bond equivalent rates on 91-day Treasury bills 
auctioned during the preceding calendar quarter, or 3 per centum per 
annum, but in no case less than zero. [FR Doc. 2015-18545]. In addition 
to this Notice, Treasury posts the current quarterly rate in Table 2b--
Interest Rates for Specific Legislation on the Treasury Direct website.
    The Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public Finance, Gary Grippo, 
having reviewed and approved this document, is delegating the authority 
to electronically sign this document to Heidi Cohen, Federal Register 
Liaison for the Department, for purposes of publication in the Federal 
Register.

Heidi Cohen,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2024-00148 Filed 1-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AS-P
SUBSIDIARIES



The following is a list of the Company's consolidated subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1996:

                                                            Percent of
                                         State of         Voting Securities
Subsidiary                              Organization            Owned
----------                              ------------       -----------------

The Beard Company (1)                        Oklahoma         Registrant
Beard Oil Company                            Delaware            100%
Beard Oilfield Service and Supply Co. (2)    Oklahoma            100%
Beard Technologies, Inc.                     Oklahoma            100%
BSK, Inc.                                    Oklahoma             90%
Carbonic Reserves                            Nevada               85%
Crescent Well Service, Inc. (2)              Oklahoma            100%
Horizontal Drilling Technologies, Inc.       Kansas               80%
Reid Supply Company (2)                      Nevada              100%
The Oaks Venture, Inc.                       Oklahoma            100%
Whitetail Services, Inc.                     Delaware             80%

---------------

(1) The consolidated financial statements of the Company include accounts of
    Registrant and the subsidiaries controlled by the Registrant.

(2) Inactive subsidiary.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4263 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to small company capital 

formation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 7, 2017 

Mr. MACARTHUR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to small 

company capital formation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Regulation At Im5 provement Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. JOBS ACT-RELATED EXEMPTION. 

7 Section 3(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 

8 77c(b)) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking 

10 ‘‘$50,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$75,000,000, adVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:18 Nov 08, 2017 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4263.IH H4263

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4263 IH

1 justed for inflation by the Commission every 2 years 

2 to the nearest $10,000 to reflect the change in the 

3 Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers 

4 published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics’’; and 

5 (2) in paragraph (5)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘such amount as’’ and in7 serting: ‘‘such amount, in addition to the ad8 justment for inflation provided for under such 

9 paragraph (2)(A), as’’; and 

10 (B) by striking ‘‘such amount, it’’ and in11 serting ‘‘such amount, in addition to the adjust12 ment for inflation provided for under such 

13 paragraph (2)(A), it’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Find more data on this and other topics at www.arc.gov/chartbook

LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION EMPLOYMENT RATE

EMPLOYMENT LOCATION BY SUBREGION UNEMPLOYMENT RATE BY SUBREGION









	

 










 






 	




 


 





 














































				


			

			
 
­
		

­­­			 ­	 ­­­ 			


	

­­