alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009044EN.01003801.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/38

---

Action brought on 19 December 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-567/08)

(2009/C 44/64)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. Støvlbæk and V. Perre, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (1) and, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Grand Duchy of Luxemburg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (1) and, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Grand Duchy of Luxemburg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | Order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition of Directive 2005/36/EC expired on 20 October 2007. At the date on which the present action was brought, the defendant had not yet adopted all the measures necessary for transposition of the Directive or, in any event, had not notified the Commission thereof.

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22.

1

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RANDY PONCE and MOBILITY 

EXPERTS, L.L.C.,

Appellants, 

v.

TBF FINANCIAL, L.L.C.,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00111-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 6

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2020DCV2776)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellants joint agreed motion to dismiss the 

appeal and concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed, in 

accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We further order costs 

of this appeal are taxed against the parties incurring same, and this decision be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH OF SEPTEMBER, 2021.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

KENNETH LEE BROWN, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-911

March 27, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Stephen Mathew 

Whyte, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur. 

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         900,408
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,106,729
<ALLOWANCES>                                   35,000
<INVENTORY>                                    185,562
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,464,670
<PP&E>                                         2,671,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,258,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,127,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,976,060
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    649
<COMMON>                                       18,585
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,976,333)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,127,909
<SALES>                                        44,101,409
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               44,101,409
<CGS>                                          35,157,469
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  35,157,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               15,050,831
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             365,067
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,471,458)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   5,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,477,458)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,477,458)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.36)



</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4566 

To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 

Act to provide relief to nonbanks from certain stress test requirements 

under such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2017 

Mr. POLIQUIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to provide relief to nonbanks from 

certain stress test requirements under such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alleviating Stress Test 

5 Burdens to Help Investors Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STRESS TEST RELIEF FOR NONBANKS. 

7 Section 165(i) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Re8 form and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5365(i)) 

9 is amended— 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4566 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1)(B)(ii), by striking ‘‘and 

2 nonbank financial companies’’; 

3 (2) in paragraph (2)— 

4 (A) in subparagraph (A)— 

5 (i) by striking ‘‘other financial compa6 nies’’ and inserting ‘‘other bank holding 

7 companies’’; and 

8 (ii) by striking ‘‘and are regulated by 

9 a primary Federal financial regulatory 

10 agency’’; and 

11 (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking 

12 ‘‘Each Federal primary financial regulatory 

13 agency, in coordination with the Board of Gov14 ernors and the Federal Insurance Office, shall 

15 issue consistent and comparable’’ and inserting 

16 ‘‘The Board of Governors, in coordination with 

17 the Federal primary financial regulatory agen18 cies and the Federal Insurance Office shall 

19 issue’’; and 

20 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(3) LIMITATION.—The Board of Governors 

22 may limit the requirements of this subsection with 

23 respect to a nonbank financial company supervised 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4566 IH

1 by the Board of Governors, if the Board of Gov2 ernors determines such limitation is appropriate.’’. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Richard Iritano, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority et al., Respondents.

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondent New York City Transit Authority to reinstate the petitioner to his position as a Principal Administrative Associate III and to give him a name-clearing hearing, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated December 19, 1989, which dismissed the petition for failure to state a cause of action and denied the petitioner a name-clearing hearing.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the judgment as denied the petitioner a name-clearing hearing is dismissed as withdrawn; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded costs.

The petitioner, a provisional employee, brought this proceeding seeking to compel his employer, the New York City Transit Authority, to reinstate him to his former position, *919together with back pay, costs, disbursements, and attorneys’ fees, and to give him a name-clearing hearing. The New York City Transit Authority moved to dismiss the petition pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) for failure to state a cause of action. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, stating that the conduct of which the petitioner complained did not fall within the provisions of Civil Service Law § 75-b and that he was not entitled to a name-clearing hearing.

It is firmly established that provisional employees "may be [discharged] at any time without charges preferred, a statement of reasons given or a hearing held” *(Matter of Preddice v Callarian,*69 NY2d 812, 814). Moreover, absent a violation of a constitutional or statutory provision, reinstatement is not an available remedy to the employee. The record at bar does not support the petitioner’s claim of a violation of his right to freedom of expression *(cf., Connick v Myers,*461 US 138, 142).

We note that the petitioner has, by letter, withdrawn his appeal from so much of the judgment as denied him a name-clearing hearing. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
p.1 

OAR Box 1413 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

39) 11-1-39 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/9/2008 3:11:22 PM Sheet 39 of 114 
P.2 

YJr jr"*-

5094596828 SCflPCfl 742 P01 NOU 06 '96 12:&J 

.: jr>x-3<? . 

SCAPCA UOI West College, Suite 403, Spokane. WA 99201 

FAX Daie: H/06/9 6 

Number of pages including cover sheet* 3 

To: 

Phone: 

Fax phone: 

CC: 

Madeline Strum 

U.S.E.P.A.. Mail Drop 13 

Research Triangle Park. NC 

97711 

919-541-2383 

919-541-5689 

Prom: 

A ' 

Phone: 

Fax phone: 

Charles Studer 

509-456-4727 

509-459-6828 

REMARKS,: • Urgent O For your review • Reply ASAP • Please comment 

Attached is the information that6 you requested. If you need further infonnation or clarificaiion, please call. These 

documents are pan of the public information section of a Notice of Construction and an Air Operating Pennit. 
P.3 

5094596828 SCflPCfl 742 P02

 :NOU 06 '96 12:00 

FIBER TECH INDUSTRIES, INC. - NOC #706 

Project Description 

* 

Fiber Tech Industries. Inc., in order to satisfy the requirements of the Federal air operating permits 

program (Title V). is applying for a Notice of Construction on 1 existing fiberglass reinforced plywood 

operation at 3808 N Sullivan Road Bldg. 31, Spokane, WA. The complete operation includes three 

distinct emission units: a methylene chloride solvent metal cleaner tank; a gel coating operation; and a 

fiberglass/resin lamination process, performed inside of a vacuum curing oven. 

The methylene chloride solvent metal deaner tank is used to clean hand tools associated with 

operations. 

The gel coating operation Is automated. A Low Volume Low Pressure (LVLP) gun applies the gel coat 

to sheets of dear plastic, and is stripped from the plastic sheet after drying. The resulting gel coat layer 

is used as an outer surface for their fiberglass reinforced panels. The gel coating operation indudes a 

Fiber Tech Industries model #1 1.5" Andreae filter filtration system with a maximum air flow of about 

8,080 scfm. 

The fiberglass/resin lamination process involves placing a gel coat layer and a fiberglass and resin 

layer on each side of a sheet of 5/8" plywood. A oven cover is then placed over the lamination and the 

air is evacuated from the oven. The oven then cures the lamination. 

The product is then sized with automated cut off saws. The dust is collected by a baghouse (NOC714). 

The panels are used as siding in trailers. 

C:*OATA\WINWORO\PAINTlNOC70e.MEM 

7^ 
4* 

rW: 

P.4 

5094596828 SCRPCfl 742 P03 NOU 06 '96 12:00 

LV 

— Trim Saw Trim Saw 

Plywood Assembly 

Fiberglass Resin 

Application & Nozzle 

Hush (1.1) 

Yes 

No 

Equipment Soaking 

& Geaning as 

Necessa^ (1.6) 

Gel Coaling & 

Nozzle Flush 

(1-2) 

Press 

(1.4) 

To Ambient through 

Building Vents 

(15) 

Sizing/Trim Saw 

Load Staging 

Shipping 

Numbers in parentheses correspond to generadon or 

discharge points described in the Air Operating Permit. 3 

Through Filters and 

Fans to Stack 

(1-3) 

Fiber Tech Industries 

BISON 

BWRCN-BNTAL 

RESOURCES 

107 S. Cedar Si/Spokane. WA 99204 

# % 

Process Flow Diagram
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6001]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Ms. JACKSON LEE of Texas:
       H.J. Res. 119.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       This bill is enacted pursuant to the power granted to 
     Congress under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 of the United 
     States Constitution.
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                    |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: February 22, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    JAMES
BRYCE
|                         |  |  |  | Name:              |  | James P. Bryce         
|                         |  |  |  | Title:             |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6389]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

        ADJOURNMENT UNTIL MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2012, at 2 P.M.

  Mr. DURBIN. If there is no further business to come before the 
Senate, I ask unanimous consent that it adjourn under the previous 
order.
  There being no objection, the Senate, at 8:03 p.m., adjourned until 
Monday, September 17, 2012, at 2 p.m.

                          ____________________
```
# Wetzel - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Region 10–Bel-O-Mar Regional Council and Interstate Planning Commission Executive Director Scott Hicks Email &#x62;&#x65;&#x6c;&#x6f;&#x6d;&#97;&#114;&#64;&#98;elo&#x6d;&#x61;&#x72;&#x2e;&#x6f;&#x72;&#103;The post Region 10–Bel-O-Mar Regional Council and Interstate Planning Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Opinion issued September 24, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00206-CR

———————————

CODY CRYMES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 253rd District Court

Chambers County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 17166

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Cody Crymes, pled guilty to the felony offense of sexual assault of a 

child. The trial court found appellant guilty and, in accordance with the terms of 

appellant’s plea bargain agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to ten years 

deferred adjudication and imposed a fine of $1,500.00. Appellant filed a notice of 

appeal. We dismiss the appeal. 
2

In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were raised 

by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s 

permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 2006); TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the 

defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id. The 

trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the defendant has 

no right of appeal. See id. at 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court’s 

certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because 

appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 

S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction 

to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 

25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis 

for the appeal.”). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Brown.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
# C_2010234EN.01003301.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2010 — Trautwein v OHIM (Representation of a horse)

(Case T-386/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a Community figurative mark representing a horse - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 234/57

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nadine Trautwein Rolf Trautwein GbR, Research and Development (Leopoldshöhe, Germany) (represented by: C. Czychowski, A. Nordemann and A. Dustmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs (OHIM) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of 7 July 2008 of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM (Case R 1730/2007-1) concerning an application for registration as a Community trade mark of a figurative sign representing a horse

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Nadine Trautwein Rolf Trautwein GbR, Research and Development to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Nadine Trautwein Rolf Trautwein GbR, Research and Development to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 6.12.2008.

1

---
303 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Suite 2000
Atlanta, GA 30308










Independent Accountants' Report


The Partners
Lend Lease Asset Management, L.P.:

We have examined the accompanying management's assertion that Lend Lease Asset Management, L.P. (the "Partnership") complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, to the extent such standards were applicable to the special servicing performed by the Partnership, as of and for the year ended December 3 1, 200 1. Management is responsible for the Partnership's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Partnership's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Partnership's compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Partnership's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Lend Lease Asset Management, L.P. complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards during the year ended December 31, 2001 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
February 13, 2002
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 125 (Monday, September 17, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6391]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        House of Representatives

The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on 
Tuesday, September 18, 2012, at 12 noon.

                   _________________________________
```
Exhibit 13.1

---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Patricio Contesse, Chief Executive Officer of Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Chile, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|1. | The Annual Report of SQM on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|2. | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SQM.                                                                                  

/s/ Patricio Contesse G.Name: Patricio Contesse G.
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: June 30, 2005

---