alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         658,363
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               742,435
<PP&E>                                         173,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 970,203
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,171,692
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       148,242
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,349,731)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   970,203
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               159,917
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,774,047
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             727,156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,103,009)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,213,009)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 110,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,103,009)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-83954, 333-81396, 333-43952, 333-33338, 333-93653,
333-85161, 333-51117, 333-33197, 333-06301) pertaining to the Supplemental Stock Option/ Stock Issuance Plan, 1993 Stock Option/ Stock Issuance Plan, 1998 Stock Option/ Stock Issuance Plan and
Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Ultratech Stepper, Inc. of our report dated January 21, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Ultratech Stepper, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

| |  | /s/ERNST & YOUNGLLP
| |  | -------------------

San
Jose, California
March 22, 2002

---

QuickLinks
# C_2010148EN.01000901.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 April 2010 — Ralf Schräder v Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)

(Case C-38/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - The Court’s power of review - Regulations (EC) Nos 2100/94 and 1239/95 - Agriculture - Community plant variety rights - Distinctness of the candidate variety - Variety a matter of common knowledge - Proof - Plant variety SUMCOL 01)

2010/C 148/13

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Ralf Schräder (represented by: T. Leidereiter, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (represented by: M. Ekvad and B. Kiewiet, acting as Agents, and by A. von Mühlendahl, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 19 November 2008 in Case T-187/06 Schräder v CPVO, by which that Court dismissed the action brought by the appellant against the decision of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) of 2 May 2006 dismissing the appeal against the decision of the CPVO concerning the rejection of the application for Community plant variety rights in respect of the plant variety ‘SUMCOL 01’ — Distinctness of the candidate variety — Factors which can be taken into consideration in order to determine whether a variety is a matter of common knowledge — Incorrect assessment of the facts — Infringement of the right to be heard before a court

Schräder

CPVO

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders Mr Schräder to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Schräder to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 04.04.2009.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.14

              BELDEN INC. LONG-TERM CASH PERFORMANCE PLAN (SUMMARY)

The Belden Inc. Long-Term Cash Performance Plan is part of the long-term
component of management's total compensation (the other long-term components
being stock options, restricted stock and other awards under the Long-Term
Incentive Plan). Awards are given annually and have four-year performance
cycles. At the end of the four years, the management participant's cash payment
will be determined by the achievement of Company-based financial objectives
during the four-year period. Such financial objectives are based on the
Company's EBITDA and ROIC during the measurement period relative to a benchmark
index. Depending on the Company's attainment of such performance goals, the
award will either result in no payment, a minimum payment, a target payment, a
maximum payment or a payment in between these amounts. The Compensation
Committee establishes the performance goals for each award.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Patricio Contesse, Chief Executive Officer
of Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (“SQM”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Republic
of Chile, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Annual Report of SQM on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of SQM.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Patricio Contesse G.        | 
|------------------------------- | 
|Name:  Patricio Contesse G.     | 
|Title:  Chief Executive Officer | 
|Date: April 27, 2012            |
Exhibit 32.3

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009(the Report) of MCG Capital
Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Linda A. Nimmons, the Chief Accounting Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ LINDA A. NIMMONSName:

Linda A. NimmonsTitle:

Chief Accounting OfficerDate:

May 8, 2009
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blast Energy Services, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John
O’Keefe, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
November 13, 2008




By:
            /s/
      John O’KeefeJohn
      O’KeefeChief
      Executive OfficerPrincipal
      Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1459]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      HONORING CAPTAIN JOE MORRIS

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. HEATH SHULER

                           of north carolina

                    in the house of representatives

                       Monday, September 10, 2012

  Mr. SHULER. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor Captain Joe Morris, 
who retires from law enforcement after having completed over 40 years 
of outstanding service to his community and Western North Carolina.
  Joe has shown devotion to upholding the rule of law and ensuring the 
safety of our mountain communities throughout his career. He began in 
1964 as a Highway Patrol Officer, a position in which he excelled until 
he retired as a Master Trooper in 1985.
  He later served as a Captain for Sheriff Homer Holbrooks at the Macon 
County Sheriffs Department until 2002. Joe once again returned to 
service the same year, working as the Jail Administrator and as a 
Captain at the Cherokee County Sheriffs Department. It is from this 
position that we can celebrate his retirement.
  Through literally decades of service, Joe has shown extraordinary 
dedication to law enforcement in Western North Carolina, and as has had 
a particularly important impact on Macon and Cherokee Counties. As his 
nephew, I could not be prouder. Thank you, Uncle Joe, for all of your 
service to Western North Carolina.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 23.1

                    CONSENT OF KPMG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Bedford Property Investors, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-3 (No.'s 333-23687, 333-33643 and 333-33795) and the registration statements
on Form S-8 (No.'s 033-52375, 333-18215, 333-70681 and 333-74707) of Bedford
Property Investors, Inc. of our report dated February 11, 2002, except for notes
2 and 17 to the consolidated financial statements which are as of August 16,
2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Bedford Property Investors,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, and the related
consolidated financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2001, which report
appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Bedford
Property Investors, Inc.


                                        KPMG LLP

San Francisco, California
August 23, 2002


                                       F35
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 30, 2014

NO. 03-13-00625-CV

Dr. Kyle Janek, Executive Commissioner of Texas Health and Human Services 

Commission; and Doug Wilson, Inspector General for the Office of Inspector General, 

Appellants

v.

Harlingen Family Dentistry, P.C., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 2, 2013. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.1

                         EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION

         This EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION (hereinafter referred to as this
"AGREEMENT EXTENSION"), is entered into effective the 8th day of April, 2005, by
and between The Franklin Savings and Loan Company, a savings and loan
association incorporated under the laws of the State of Ohio (hereinafter
referred to as the "EMPLOYER") and Thomas H. Siemers, an individual (hereinafter
referred to as the "EMPLOYEE");

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, the EMPLOYEE is currently employed as the President CEO of the
EMPLOYER; and

         WHEREAS, the EMPLOYER and the EMPLOYEE are parties to an employment
agreement dated October 23, 2000 (the "EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT"); and

         WHEREAS, Section 1 of the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT provides that the Board
of Directors of the EMPLOYER may extend the term of the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT for
a one-year term beyond the then effective expiration date, provided the Board
has determined that the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT should be extended; and

         WHEREAS, as a result of the skill, knowledge, performance and
experience of the EMPLOYEE, the Board of Directors of the EMPLOYER has
determined that the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT should be extended for an additional
one-year term; and

         WHEREAS, the EMPLOYEE desires to continue to serve as the Vice
President of the EMPLOYER and consents to the extension of the EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants
herein contained, the EMPLOYER and the EMPLOYEE hereby agree as follows:

         1. Extension of Term of Employment Agreement. The term of the
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is extended for a one year period and shall end on October
23, 2008 (the "EXTENDED TERM").

         2. Effect of Prior Agreements. All of the terms and conditions of the
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT shall remain in full force and effect during the EXTENDED
TERM.

<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the EMPLOYER has caused this AGREEMENT EXTENSION to
be executed by its duly authorized officer, and the EMPLOYEE has consented to
and signed this AGREEMENT EXTENSION, each as of the day and year first above
written.


                                           EMPLOYER:

Attest:                                    THE FRANKLIN SAVINGS AND LOAN COMPANY


/s/ Gretchen J. Schmidt                    By:  /s/ Daniel T. Voelpel
---------------------------                     -----------------------------
Gretchen J. Schmidt                        Name:  Daniel T. Voelpel
---------------------------                      ----------------------------
                                           Title:  Vice President
                                                  ---------------------------


                                           EMPLOYEE:
Attest:


/s/ Gretchen J. Schmidt                    /s/ Thomas H. Siemers
---------------------------                ----------------------------------
Gretchen J. Schmidt                        Thomas H. Siemers
---------------------------
D.1. IMPROVE Monitoring Site Map and Description 

(IMPROVE/Protocol Network in year 2002)1 

State National Parks Referenced in TSD 

Utah Bryce Canyon (51), Canyonlands (50), Capitol Reef (52), Zion (49) 

Nevada Great Basin (116), Jarbidge Wilderness Area (68) 

California-Oregon Border Crater Lake (86), Lava Beds National Monument (87) 

Idaho Craters of the Moon (69), Sawtooth (70) 

Montana Cabinet Mountains (75), Gates of the Mountains (74), Sula Peak (71) 

Wyoming Bridger Wilderness (65), North Absaroka Wilderness (67), Yellowstone (66) 

IMPROVE Monitoring Program Overview 

The Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) program is a cooperative 

measurement effort governed by a steering committee composed of representatives from Federal and 

regional-state organizations. The IMPROVE monitoring program was established in 1985 to aid the 

creation of Federal and State implementation plans for the protection of visibility in Class I areas (156 

national parks and wilderness areas) as stipulated in the 1977 amendments to the Clean Air Act. 

The objectives of IMPROVE include: 

(1) establishing current visibility and aerosol conditions in mandatory class I areas; and 

 

1

http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Overview/IMPROVENetworkExp.htm 

.

IMPROVE Sites (1-110)

Protocol Sites (111-163)

2 

1

125 

126 

4 

128 

129 

127 

3

130 

131 

132 

133 

135 

137 5

136 

138 

8 

6

7 

22 

25 

23 24 

139 

140 

14 

30 

29 

27 

28 

26 

21 

141 

9

10 13 

11 

12 

15 

16 

17 

142 

20 18 

19 

106 

105 

103 

102 

111 

108 

107 

31 

32 

36 

37 

42 38 

33 

34 

35 

41 

39 40 

120 

122 

123 

44 

121

43 

45 

46 

47 

48 

124 

117 

49 

51 

52 50 

201

54 

55 

53 

56 

57 58 

114 

116 

101 

100 

99 

93 

94 

118 

98 

110 

109 

92 

96 97 

91 95 

104 90 68 

88 

87 

89 

86 76 

84 

85 112 

79 

78 

83 

80 

82 

81

134 

77 

69 

70 

202 

71 

75 72 

73 

74 64 

63 62 

61 

59 

60 

119 

65 

67 

66 

143 

144 

QA Sites (201-202) 

159

158 157 

156

155

154 153

151 152 

150

149

148

147

146

145

160

161

162 163
(2) identifying chemical species and emission sources responsible for existing man-made visibility 

impairment. 

The particulate monitoring portion of the IMPROVE program measures the concentration of the fine 

(PM2.5) particles for mass, optical absorption, major and trace elements, organic and elemental carbon, 

and nitrate and of PM10 particles for mass. Prior to 2000, IMPROVE sites collect two samples per 

week, on Wednesday and Saturday. With the implementation of the Regional Haze Rule the IMPROVE 

program changed to a 1-in-3 day schedule. 

http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Overview/Overview.htm
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4786 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4786

To require State and local law enforcement agencies to promptly report 
 the loss or theft of any firearm to the National Tracing Center, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2018

 Mr. Meeks (for himself, Mr. Cicilline, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Schakowsky, 
 Mr. DeSaulnier, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. Gutierrez, Mrs. Watson Coleman, 
   Mr. Himes, Mr. Ellison, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Quigley, Mr. 
    Suozzi, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Evans, Ms. Norton, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. 
 Blumenauer, and Ms. Kelly of Illinois) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require State and local law enforcement agencies to promptly report 
 the loss or theft of any firearm to the National Tracing Center, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Communities from Lost or 
Stolen Law Enforcement Weapons Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO REPORT LOSS OR THEFT OF FIREARM.

    A law described in this section is a law of a State that requires a 
State or local law enforcement officer, if that State or local law 
enforcement officer carries a firearm in the performance of or 
otherwise has custody of a firearm in the course of his or her duties, 
and that State or local law enforcement officer determines that such 
firearm has been lost or stolen, to report the loss or theft 
immediately to that officer's supervising officer, and requires the 
State or local law enforcement agency that employs the officer to 
report such loss or theft, not later than 48 hours after the report of 
the officer, to the National Tracing Center of the Bureau of Alcohol, 
Tobacco, and Firearms of the Department of Justice.

SEC. 3. PRIORITY FOR COPS GRANTS.

    Section 1701(c) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act 
of 1968 is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) from an applicant in a State that has in effect a law 
        that is described in section 2 of the Protecting Communities 
        from Lost or Stolen Law Enforcement Weapons Act of 2017.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### APPLICATION of Everett Dale SANDERS, Edmond Riley Sanders and Robert Harmon Wilson for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

No. A-12266.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Oct. 12, 1955.

Frank Grayson, Oklahoma City, for petitioners.

Granville Scanland, County Atty., Tom Hamill, Asst. County Atty., Oklahoma City, for respondent.

JONES, Presiding Judge.

This is an original action in habeas corpus by Everett Dale Sanders, Edmond Riley Sanders and Robert Harmon Wilson in which they alleged they were illegally restrained of their liberty in the county jail of Oklahoma County. The verified petition alleges that the petitioners were jointly charged with the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon and that upon their arraignment before a justice of the peace their bonds were fixed at the sum of $5,000 for each petitioner. It is alleged that such bond is excessive and in violation of Article 2, Section 9 of the Oklahoma Constitution.

A rule to show cause was issued and a hearing was held in connection with said petition.

The purpose of an appearance bond is to guarantee that the accused will be available at such times as the court may direct. It should never be used for the purpose of punishing the accused. The punishment fixed by statute for a conviction of the charge filed against the accused may be by imprisonment in the penitentiary not exceeding five years or by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year. 21 O.S.1951 § 645. We are convinced that the bond fixed by the justice of the peace and approved by the District Court at a hearing before said court was excessive and that bail in the amount of $2,000 is reasonable *156under all the facts and circumstances of the case.

It is therefore ordered that the appearance bond of each of the petitioners be and the same is hereby fixed in the sum of $2,000, said bond to be conditioned as provided by law and approved, by, the justice of the peace before, whom the preliminary complaint is pending.

BRETT and POWELL, JJ., concur.