alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1477]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         REMEMBERING IDA KEIPER

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. TIM RYAN

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                      Tuesday, September 11, 2012

  Mr. RYAN of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said 
``everyone can be great because everyone can serve.'' I rise today to 
remember and honor the life of a model of service, Ida Keiper. I used 
to tease her and call her ``Mama Keips'' because I knew she was Italian 
and she reminded me so much of my Italian grandmother. She was born in 
Grindstone, Pennsylvania, in 1935 to the late Antonio and Emma 
Perazolla. She spent the majority of her adult life in the Mantua, 
Ohio, area. Her life cannot simply be measured by the number of years 
raising children, the good Italian meals prepared or the countless 
hours spent helping with homework. Her service went beyond the walls of 
her home and stretched across the community.
  Ida was a member of numerous organizations such as the PTA, the Boy 
and Girl Scouts of America, and the Crestwood Band Patrons. She also 
served on the Democratic Central Executive Committee for over 20 years 
and was a member of the Federated Democratic Women of Portage County 
Ohio. In addition to her volunteer work she was also an active member 
of The Church of Jesus Christ Kirtland Restoration Branch.
  Ida left these thoughts to those she loves: ``Goodbye to my family 
and friends. I hope that the paths we have traveled and passed were 
good ones. I pray that we will meet again in God's Kingdom. Make the 
most of and celebrate your gift of life. So grieve for me awhile, if 
grieve you must, then let your grief be comforted with trust. It's only 
for awhile that we must part, so bless the memories with your heart.''
  Ida Keiper passed away August 6, 2012 at the age of 76. Her legacy 
lives on through her family and the people she touched with her 
selflessness and generosity. She is survived by her husband, Charles W. 
Keiper and their four children, Charles W. Keiper II, Faith Keiper, 
Linda Pallotto and Cindy Iozzia, four grandchildren, Sara, Michael, 
Spencer, Nathan and Lauren, and five siblings, Pete Perazzola, Nick 
Perazzola, Stella Nixon, Lundy Fisco and Agnes Pinkney. I offer my 
condolences to the family and all those whose lives who have been 
touched by her gentleness and grace. Italian mothers and grandmothers 
are a special breed and Mama Keips was as special as they come. She 
will be missed.

                          ____________________
```
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3, No. 333-88011, No. 333-52747, and No. 333-31292 of Wild Oats Markets, Inc. and the Registration Statements on Form S-8, No. 333-66347, No. 333-20539, and No. 333-64054 of Wild Oats Markets, Inc. pertaining to the Wild Oats Markets, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan and Employee Equity Incentive Plans of our report dated November 17, 1999, with respect to the financial statements of Sun Harvest Farms, Inc. as of September 28, 1999, December 29, 1998 and December 30, 1997, and for the nine-month period ended September 28, 1999 and the fiscal years ended December 29, 1998, December 30, 1997 and December 31, 1996, included in the amended Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) dated August 10, 2001.

 

 

						Ernst & Young LLP

 

San Antonio, Texas

August 10, 2001
Subsidiaries of the Registrant

1.   Western Energy Management, Inc. ("WEM"), is a Delaware corporation and is a
     wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

2.   Onsite Energy  Services,  Inc.  ("OES"),  is a Kansas  corporation and is a
     wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

3.   SYCOM ONSITE Corporation ("SO Corporation"),  is a Delaware corporation and
     is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

4.   Onsite  Energy  de  Panama,  S.A.  is  a  Panamanian   corporation  and  is
     wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

5.   REEP Onsite, Inc. ("REEP") is a Delaware  corporation and is a wholly-owned
     subsidiary of the Company.

6.   ERSI Onsite, Inc. ("ERSI") is a Delaware  corporation and is a wholly-owned
     subsidiary of the Company.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Arthur Zafiropoulo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|By:    |  | /s/ARTHUR ZAFIROPOULO   |  | 
|------ |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Name:  |  | Arthur Zafiropoulo      |  | 
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 

I, Bruce Wright, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|By:    |  | /s/BRUCE WRIGHT         |  | 
|------ |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Name:  |  | Bruce Wright            |  | 
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | 

---

QuickLinks
#### STATE v. SMITH.

No. A-11941.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

March 16, 1954.

*588Lloyd H. Henry, County Atty., John L. Green, Robert A. Wilson, Asst. County Attys., Shawnee, for the State.

Shelton Skinner, Shawnee, for defendant in error.

• JONES, Judge.

This is an attempted appeal by the State of Oklahoma, acting through the county attorney of Pottawatomie county, from the District Court of Pottawatomie county on a reserved question of law. The appeal is based on a purported transcript with petition in error attached.

The attempted appeal was filed in this ■court on May 27, 1953. No brief has ever .been filed on behalf of the State. On November 17, 1953, counsel for the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the purported appeal and a brief in support of the motion. This motion was based upon the fact that the alleged reserved question of law which it was sought to have determined in this court could only be determined by a consideration of the evidence, for the reason that, the question for determination was a mixed question of law and fact involving a ruling of the trial court on the admissibility of evidence. It was further stated in the motion that the transcript was defective for the reason that it contained no copy of a final judgment or order.

 The motion to dismiss was set for hearing but no one appeared on behalf of the State and no response has been filed to the motion. In Ward v. State, 56 Okl.Cr. 316, 38 P.2d 582, it is stated:

> “Mixed questions of law and fact involving rulings of the trial court on the •admissibility of evidence, and failure of the trial court to fully instruct on the law applicable to the evidence can only be presented for review on appeal by incorporating the same into a bill of exceptions or case-made, such questions are not presented for review on appeal by transcript of the record alone.”

In Thornton v. State, 86 Okl.Cr. 394, 193 P.2d 609, 610, it was held:

> “Where an appeal is taken from an alleged judgment of conviction, and the transcript of the record or case-made contains no copy of the judgment of the trial court, this Court does not acquire jurisdiction of the appeal, and such appeal will be dismissed.”

The motion to dismiss the purported appeal is sustained and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

POWELL, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
# C_2012126EN.01001201.xml

| 28.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2012 — Mustang v OHIM — Decathlon (Wavy line)

(Case T-379/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a figurative Community mark representing a wavy line - Earlier national and international figurative trade marks representing a white wavy line on a black background - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2012/C 126/23

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mustang — Bekleidungswerke GmbH & Co. KG (Künzelsau, Germany) (represented by: A. Klett and K. Weimer, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Pethke, agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Decathlon SA (Villeneuve d’Ascq, France) (represented by: P. Demoly, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 July 2008 (Case R 859/2007-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Decathlon SA and Mustang — Bekleidungswerke GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mustang — Bekleidungswerke GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mustang — Bekleidungswerke GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 6.12.2008.

1

---
September 18, 2012 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H6069 

Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 of the Constitution 

f 

ADDITIONAL SPONSORS 

Under clause 7 of rule XII, sponsors 

were added to public bills and resolutions as follows: 

H.R. 998: Mr. SCHRADER. 

H.R. 1006: Mr. GRIFFITH of Virginia. 

H.R. 1831: Mr. HANNA. 

H.R. 1860: Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas. 

H.R. 1910: Mr. WESTMORELAND. 

H.R. 2069: Mr. DENHAM and Mr. MICHAUD. 

H.R. 2492: Mr. GUINTA. 

H.R. 3032: Mr. RUPPERSBERGER. 

H.R. 3110: Mr. OWENS. 

H.R. 3423: Mr. CULBERSON. 

H.R. 3432: Ms. WOOLSEY. 

H.R. 3506: Mr. BRALEY of Iowa. 

H.R. 4066: Mr. RUNYAN. 

H.R. 4336: Mr. HULTGREN. 

H.R. 5742: Mr. FITZPATRICK. 

H.R. 5907: Ms. LEE of California. 

H.R. 5943: Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BOREN, Ms. 

BALDWIN, Mr. DUFFY, and Mr. CRITZ. 

H.R. 6043: Mr. DENT and Ms. ZOE LOFGREN

of California. 

H.R. 6292: Ms. VELA ́ ZQUEZ. 

H.R. 6361: Mr. MICHAUD. 

H.R. 6387: Mr. LANKFORD. 

H.R. 6419: Mr. MEEKS, Mr. BECERRA, Ms. 

EDWARDS, Mr. FILNER, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. 

LEWIS of Georgia, and Mr. CLARKE of Michigan. 

H.J. Res. 118: Mr. ROKITA, Ms. FOXX, Mr. 

CARTER, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. WALBERG, 

Mr. DESJARLAIS, and Mr. BARLETTA. 

H. Con. Res. 122: Mr. CULBERSON. 

H. Res. 776: Mr. MCCAUL and Mr. WEST. 

H. Res. 783: Mr. LANCE and Mr. BILIRAKIS. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with HOUSE
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4730 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4730

     To amend the Clean Air Act with respect to nonattainment plan 
                  provisions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 21, 2017

Ms. McSally (for herself, Mr. Schweikert, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Gosar, and Mr. 
    Issa) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Clean Air Act with respect to nonattainment plan 
                  provisions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Air Contingency Measures Act 
of 2018''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 172(c)(9) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7502(c)(9)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following: ``Nothing in this Act 
precludes, with respect to any plan or plan provision, the inclusion 
and approval of contingency measures that are or may be implemented or 
take effect prior to the area involved failing to make reasonable 
further progress or to attain any national primary ambient air quality 
standard by the applicable attainment date.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2008079EN.01003001.xml

| 29.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/30

---

Action brought on 23 January 2008 — Winzer Pharma v OHIM — Oftaltech (OFTASIL)

(Case T-30/08)

(2008/C 79/59)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Dr. Robert Winzer Pharma GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: S. Schneller, Rechtsanwalt)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Oftaltech S.A. (L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Forms of order sought

| — | Annulment of the decision of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 October 2007 (R 599/2007-2) and the decision of the Opposition Division of OHIM of 19 February 2007 (B 925 554); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the decision of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 October 2007 (R 599/2007-2) and the decision of the Opposition Division of OHIM of 19 February 2007 (B 925 554);

| — | rejection of Community trade mark application No 4 229 274 ‘OFTASIL’; |
| --- | --- |

—

rejection of Community trade mark application No 4 229 274 ‘OFTASIL’;

| — | holding of oral proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

holding of oral proceedings;

| — | an order that OHIM pays the costs of the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

an order that OHIM pays the costs of the proceedings;

| — | in the alternative, a referral of the case back to OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, a referral of the case back to OHIM.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Oftaltech S.A.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative trade mark ‘OFTASIL’ for goods in Class 5 (application No 4 229 274)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark ‘Ophtal’ for goods in Classes 5 and 10 (Community trade mark No 489 948), the word mark ‘Ophtal’ for goods in Class 5 (German trade mark No 800 702) and the word mark ‘OPHTAN’ for goods in Classes 5, 29 and 30 (German trade mark No 303 349 033)

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) 40/94 (1) and of the principles to be applied under this provision to examine whether there is a likelihood of confusion.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
EXHIBIT 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,  for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, in his capacity as an officer of the BFA Liquidation  Trust (the "TRUST"),
that, to his knowledge:

     (a) the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March
         31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the
         "REPORT"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b) the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Trust.

Date: May 12, 2005               By:      /s/ Clifton R. Jessup, Jr.
                                          --------------------------------------
                                 Name:    Clifton R. Jessup, Jr.
                                 Title:   Liquidating Trustee

Date: May 12, 2005               By:      /s/ Mark A. Roberts
                                          --------------------------------------
                                 Name:    Mark A. Roberts
                                 Title:    Assistant to the Liquidating Trustee

This certification is not deemed to be "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise  subject to the liability of that
section.  This  certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.


                                     - 17 -
#### P. J. HOLZMAN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 11566.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Oct. 28, 1939.

Michael E. Crogan, of Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

Maurice M. Milligan, U. S. Atty., and Richard K. Phelps, Asst. U. S. Attv., both of Kansas City, Mo.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed without costs to either party in this court, on motion of appellant and supporting affidavit. Defendant below ordered to surrender to custody, etc.
Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,  in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in his
capacity as an officer of the BFA Liquidation Trust (the "TRUST"),  that, to his
knowledge,  the Quarterly  Report of the Trust on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and that the  information  contained  in such
report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operation of the Trust.


Date: November 15, 2002          By: /s/ Clifton R. Jessup, Jr.
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Name: Clifton R. Jessup, Jr.
                                     Title: Liquidating Trustee


Date: November 15, 2002          By: /s/ Mark A. Roberts
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Name: Mark A. Roberts
                                     Title: Assistant to the Liquidating Trustee
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4699 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4699

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to authorize the use of title 
        III funds for the establishment LGBTQ resource centers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2017

Mr. Johnson of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Brown of Maryland, Mr. Carson 
  of Indiana, Mr. Crist, Mr. DeSaulnier, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Gomez, Mr. 
Grijalva, Ms. Lee, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, 
 Mr. Pallone, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Swalwell of California, Ms. 
 Titus, Mrs. Watson Coleman, and Ms. Norton) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to authorize the use of title 
        III funds for the establishment LGBTQ resource centers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Inclusive Campuses Act''.

SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR LGBTQ RESOURCE CENTERS.

    Part G of title III of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1068 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 399A. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR LGBTQ RESOURCE CENTERS.

    ``Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, an institution 
that receives funds under this title may use a portion of such funds to 
establish an on-campus resource center that provides--
            ``(1) support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and 
        queer students; and
            ``(2) programming and education about such students to the 
        entire campus community.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 126 (Tuesday, September 18, 2012)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D875]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
  No hearings were held.

                             Joint Meetings

  No joint committee meetings were held.
F
```
#### Renita Holmes, Respondent-Appellant, and Lucy Winfield, Intervenor-Respondent, v Cesar A. Perales et al., Appellants-Respondents.

— In an action, *inter alia,*for a judgment declaring that the schedule of minimum shelter allowances in Suffolk County is invalid, the defendants separately appeal, as limited by their notices of appeal and briefs, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Orgera, J.), entered December 22, 1988, as denied the motion of the defendant Perales, in which the defendant Bartsch joined, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, and granted that branch of the plaintiff Renita Holmes’ motion which was for certain preliminary injunctive relief, and (2) stated portions of an order of the same court (Namm, J.), dated July 20, 1989, which, *inter alia,*upon reargument, granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for certification of the complaint as a class action; and the plaintiff Holmes cross-appeals from so much of the order entered December 22, 1988, as denied that branch of her motion which was for certification of the complaint as a class action.

Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the provision of the order entered December 22, 1988, cross-appealed from was superseded by the order dated July 20, 1989, made upon reargument which granted class action certification; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered December 22, 1988, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements *(see, Sharp v Perales,*175 AD2d 800 [decided herewith]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated July 20, 1989, is modified, on the law, by (1) deleting from the first decretal paragraph the provision that granted that branch of the plaintiff Holmes’ motion which was for certification of the complaint as a class action and substituting therefor a provision denying that *798branch of the motion, (2) deleting from the third decretal paragraph thereof the words "as a member of the class”, (3) deleting from the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth decretal paragraphs the following words "and all others similarly situated who were members of the holmes class”, and (4) deleting from the ninth decretal paragraph the following words, "and who are members of the holmes class”; and as so modified, the order dated July 20, 1989, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements *(see, Sharp v Perales, supra).*Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.