alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.19






EXHIBIT 10.19




Summary of 2005 Management Incentive Compensation Plan




Overview and Purpose



This plan (the “2005 Bonus Plan”) was adopted by the Board of Directors of Genitope Corporation on
April 1, 2005 and is designed to offer incentive compensation to officers and senior director and
director level employees of Genitope Corporation by rewarding achievement of specifically measured
corporate goals and individual goals that are consistent with and support overall corporate goals.



Administration



The 2005 Bonus Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
(the “Compensation Committee”) and the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee will be
responsible for approving, or recommending to the Board of Directors for approval, any incentive
awards to executive officers of Genitope Corporation, including any incentive awards to the Chief
Executive Officer.



Eligibility



Each officer and senior director and director level employee of Genitope Corporation is eligible to
participate in the 2005 Bonus Plan.



Corporate and Individual Performance



The Compensation Committee has approved a list of overall corporate objectives for 2005, which
include the achievement of performance targets with respect to the Company’s clinical affairs,
regulatory objectives, financial metrics and manufacturing and facility related objectives. Each
participant is also subject to a list of key individual performance objectives. The 2005 Bonus
Plan provides for the payment of cash bonuses to participants if individual and corporate
performance criteria are achieved during fiscal 2005.



Target Cash Bonus Amount



The 2005 Bonus Plan provides a target cash bonus amount for each officer and senior director and
director level employee of Genitope Corporation, expressed as a percentage of his or her base
salary for each participant.



Performance Measurement



The 2005 Bonus Plan provides for the following scale to be used to determine the actual award
multiplier for bonus calculations based upon measurement of corporate and individual performance
versus objectives. Separate payment multipliers will be established for both the individual and
the corporate components of each award.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Performance Category	 	 	 	 	 	Award Multiplier
	Target:
	 	Performance achieved the objective.                            
	 	 	100	%
	Threshold:
	 	Performance met minimum threshold of the objective.            
	 	 	50	%
	Exceeds:
	 	Performance exceeded the objective.                            
	 	 	150	%
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1454]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                IN HONOR OF MS. MARGARET ``PEG'' BARKER

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. ROBERT E. ANDREWS

                             of new jersey

                    in the house of representatives

                       Monday, September 10, 2012

  Mr. ANDREWS. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor Ms. Margaret ``Peg'' 
Barker for her tireless service to Maple Shade Township, New Jersey. 
Ms. Barker was a pillar of her community who ceaselessly worked to end 
adult illiteracy and protect the natural resources of Maple Shade 
Township.
  Ms. Barker was a tireless advocate for literacy. As the founder of 
the Maple Shade Friends of Literacy organization, she tutored 
international residents so they could learn to read and write in the 
English language. Ms. Barker volunteered a majority of her time 
teaching English because she viewed books as a window to knowledge and 
satisfying curiosity. She wanted other residents to have the ability to 
enjoy reading and writing as much as she did.
  However, Maple Shade Friends of Literacy was only the beginning of 
Ms. Barker's service to her community. She was a member of several town 
planning committees and various environmental committees that were 
dedicated to improving the lives of residents in Maple Shade. As a 
member of the Pennsauken Water Shed Committee, Ms. Barker volunteered 
her efforts protecting the environment by making sure that the water 
shed was safe for fellow residents. Furthermore, on her own time, Ms. 
Barker volunteered by mapping and marking every storm drain in the town 
of Maple Shade in order to protect turtles. Ms. Barker was dedicated to 
protecting the environment, but also extended her services to help the 
residents of Maple Shade in any way she could.
  Mr. Speaker, Ms. Barker's endless commitment to Maple Shade Township 
should not go unrecognized. I join the township and all of South Jersey 
in paying tribute to this exceptional woman.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of City Network, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period  September 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Alice Chen, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies,  in  all  material  respects,  with  the
          requirements  of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange
          Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                        /s/ Alice Chen
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Alice Chen
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        November 29, 2006

THIS  CERTIFICATION  IS MADE  SOLELY FOR  PURPOSES  OF 18 U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
SUBJECT  TO THE  KNOWLEDGE  STANDARD  CONTAINED  THEREIN,  AND NOT FOR ANY OTHER
PURPOSE.

A SIGNED  ORIGINAL  OF THIS  WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED  BY SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE
COMPANY AND  FURNISHED TO THE  SECURITIES  AND EXCHANGE  COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF
UPON REQUEST.  THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE "FILED" AS PART
OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB THAT IT ACCOMPANIES.
# C_2008197EN.01001102.xml

| 2.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 19 May 2008 — Peter Rehder v Air Baltic Corporation

(Case C-204/08)

(2008/C 197/18)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Peter Rehder

Applicant:

Defendant: Air Baltic Corporation

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the second indent of Article 5(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1) to be interpreted as meaning that in the case of journeys by air from one Member State to another the single place of performance for all contractual obligations must be taken to be the place of the main provision of services, determined according to economic criteria? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the second indent of Article 5(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1) to be interpreted as meaning that in the case of journeys by air from one Member State to another the single place of performance for all contractual obligations must be taken to be the place of the main provision of services, determined according to economic criteria?

1

| 2. | Where a single place of performance is to be determined: What criteria are relevant for its determination; is the single place of performance determined, in particular, by the place of departure or the place of arrival? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Where a single place of performance is to be determined: What criteria are relevant for its determination; is the single place of performance determined, in particular, by the place of departure or the place of arrival?

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1.

1

---
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C.

___________________________ 

) 

In The Matter of ) 

) Docket No. OST-2013-0048 

) 

Agreement Adopted by the ) 

Passenger Services Conference ) 

Of the International Air ) 

Transport Association as ) 

Resolution 787 ) 

__________________________ ) 

MOTION OF OPEN ALLIES FOR AIRFARE TRANSPARENCY 

FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN OTHERWISE UNAUTHORIZED DOCUMENT 

 Open Allies for Airfare Transparency (“Open Allies”) hereby moves, pursuant to Section 

302.6(c) of the Department’s Rules of Practice, 14 C.F.R. § 302.6(c), for leave to file a Surreply 

(which is being filing contemporaneously herewith) to the June 21, 2013 Reply of the 

International Air Transport Association (“IATA”). Open Allies respectfully submits that the 

Department should accept this Surreply because it will assist the Department’s understanding of 

the issues and help to ensure a complete and accurate record in the case. Notably, in its Reply, 

IATA proposes for the first time significant conditions to any approval by the Department of 

Resolution 787. The Surreply includes a discussion of the proposed conditions. 

 On June 5, 2013, Open Allies filed a Supplemental Answer in this proceeding. As stated 

in that pleading, the Supplemental Answer was filed because of action taken by IATA two days 

before that seemed to have a bearing on IATA’s Application (i.e., the adoption by the 69th IATA 

Annual General Meeting of another resolution on NDC). In its Reply, IATA questions the 

propriety of that filing because it was not accompanied by a motion. To avoid any question in 

this regard, Open Allies hereby moves the Department also to accept its Supplemental Answer, 
which provides information that will clarify the issues in this proceeding and develop a more 

complete record. 

July 15, 2013 

Respectfully submitted, 

fJ I r \ irrofUJ V~rsi ~ Andrew Weinstein 

Executive Director 

Open Allies for Airfare Transparency 

913 S Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20001 

202-667-4967 

andrewwstn@gmail.com 

- 2 -
EX-10.10
                         PROMISSORY NOTE

                         PROMISSORY NOTE

Principal amount $7,000.00                                Date: May 7, 2004

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, RMD Technologies, Inc. hereby promise to
pay to the order of Patrick A. Galliher the sum of Seven Thousand
Dollars, together with interest thereon at the rate of 1% per month on
the unpaid balance. Said sum shall be paid upon demand.

     This note shall at the option of any holder thereof be
immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of any of the
following:  1) Breach of any condition of any security interest,
mortgage, loan agreement, pledge agreement or guarantee granted as
collateral security for this note. 2) Breach of any condition of any
loan agreement, security agreement or mortgage, if any, having a
priority over any loan agreement, security agreement or mortgage on
collateral granted, in whole or in part, as collateral security for
this note. 3) Upon the death, incapacity, dissolution or liquidation
of any of the undersigned, or any endorser, guarantor to surety
hereto. 4) Upon the filing by any of the undersigned of an assignment
for the benefit of creditors, bankruptcy or other form of insolvency,
or by suffering an involuntary petition in bankruptcy or receivership
not vacated within thirty (30) days.

     In the event this note shall be in default and placed for
collection, then the undersigned agree to pay all reasonable attorney
fees and costs of collection. All payments hereunder shall be made to
such address as may from time to time be designated by any holder.

     The undersigned and all other parties to this note, whether as
endorsers, guarantors or sureties, agree to remain fully bound until
this note shall be fully paid and waive demand, presentment and
protest and all notices hereto and further agree to remain bound,
notwithstanding any extension, modification, waiver, or other
indulgence or discharge or release of any obligor hereunder or
exchange, substitution, or release of any collateral granted as
security for this note. No modification or indulgence by any holder
hereof shall be binding unless in writing; and any indulgence on any
one occasion shall not be an indulgence for any other or future
occasion. Any modification or change in terms, hereunder granted by
any holder hereof, shall be valid and binding upon each of the
undersigned, notwithstanding the acknowledgement of any of the
undersigned, and each of the undersigned does hereby irrevocably grant
to each of the others a power of attorney to enter into any such
modification on their behalf. The rights of any holder hereof shall be
cumulative and not necessarily successive. This note shall take effect
as a sealed instrument and shall be construed, governed and enforced
in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

                                       RMD Technologies, Inc.


                                       By: /s/  Pat Galliher
                                       Pat Galliher, President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 01/01-0423]

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under section 309 of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, and 13 CFR 107.1900 of the Code of Federal Regulations to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 01/01-0423 issued to Crystal Financial SBIC, LP, said license is hereby declared null and void.

Bailey DeVries,

Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, United States Small Business Administration.

[FR Doc. 2024-00020 Filed 1-4-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 5, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 29, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 41 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-155, CP2024-161.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-29019 Filed 1-4-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Connections Holdings, Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







Date:August 12, 2008



|    |                        
|--- | -----------------------
|By: | /s/ BRIAN NEILL        
|    | BRIAN NEILL            
|    | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6047]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                WE NEED TO WORK TOGETHER TO CREATE JOBS

  (Mr. DOLD asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. DOLD. Mr. Speaker, this is not what economic recovery looks like. 
Last Friday's painful jobs report showed for every one American job 
that was created, four people simply exited the labor force. In fact, 
the percentage of Americans participating in the labor force today is 
lower than it has been at any time since September 1981.
  Mr. Speaker, this is a national crisis. Over 23 million Americans 
remain unemployed, underemployed, or have simply given up looking for 
work. Our Nation's GDP growth was lower in this year's second quarter 
than the first. The average monthly jobs created is less this year than 
last.
  Washington has tried a trillion dollar stimulus, 4 straight years of 
trillion dollar deficits, yet unemployment has remained above 8 percent 
for over 43 consecutive months. The American people are honestly asking 
themselves: Am I better off today than I was $6 trillion ago?
  Mr. Speaker, we need to work together to empower businesses to create 
jobs and grow our economy, which is why I've introduced a bipartisan, 
bicameral jobs bill, the Global Investment in America Jobs Act. This 
isn't about politics. It's about the millions of Americans who are 
unemployed and seeking opportunities for a better future.

                          ____________________
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00739-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.M.D.M., a Child

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13426

Honorable Robert R. Barton, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. We order no costs assessed against appellant because he is indigent. 

SIGNED March 11, 2015.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Map Created: September 2011

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2009

Personal Income Index in Appalachia, 2009

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

1.00 - 1.17

0.75 - 0.99

0.50 - 0.74

0.39 - 0.49

Personal Income Index

U.S. index value = 1.00

Appalachian index value = 0.82
Map Created: September 2011

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2009

Market Income Index in Appalachia, 2009

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

1.00 - 1.15

0.75 - 0.99

0.50 - 0.74

0.27 - 0.49

Market Income Index

U.S. index value = 1.00

Appalachian index value = 0.75
Map Created: September 2011

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2009

Proprietors Income Index in Appalachia, 2009

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

1.00 - 1.79

0.75 - 0.99

0.50 - 0.74

0.03 - 0.49

Proprietors Income Index

U.S. index value = 1.00

Appalachian index value = 0.73
Map Created: September 2011

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2009

Investment Income Index in Appalachia, 2009

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

1.00 - 1.85

0.75 - 0.99

0.50 - 0.74

0.20 - 0.49

Investment Income Index

U.S. index value = 1.00

Appalachian index value = 0.70
Map Created: September 2011

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2009

Transfer Payments Index in Appalachia, 2009

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

1.50 - 1.94

1.25 - 1.49

1.00 - 1.24

0.46 - 0.99

Transfer Payments Index

U.S. index value = 1.00

Appalachian index value = 1.13
Map Created: September 2011

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2009

Wealth Index in Appalachia, 2009

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

0.80 - 1.14

0.70 - 0.79

0.60 - 0.69

0.42 - 0.59

Wealth Index

U.S. index value = 1.00

Appalachian index value = 0.79