alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6305

LARRY COCHRAN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DR. JEAN LINDZAU; DR. AMY ROSENTHAL; DR. CARL REID,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:15-ct-03139-D)

Submitted: July 27, 2017 Decided: July 31, 2017

Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Cochran, Appellant Pro Se. Lucian P. Sbarra, HEDRICK GARDNER 

KINCHELOE & GAROFALO, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; G. Norman Acker, III, 

Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorneys, Christina Ann Kelley, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry Cochran appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint 

filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 

U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cochran v. Lindzau, 

No. 3:15-ct-03139-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-66-2023]

      ( print page 319)    
An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by the Foreign Trade Zone of Central Texas, Inc., grantee of FTZ 183, requesting an expansion of Subzone 183B on behalf of Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC, to include a site in Taylor, Texas. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on December 28, 2023.

The applicant is requesting authority to expand the subzone to include a site (1,260 acres) located on Farm to Market Road 973 in Taylor, close to Highway 79 and County Road 404. No additional authorization for production activity has been requested at this time.

In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Camille Evans of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make recommendations to the FTZ Board.

                    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary and sent to:                     *ftz@trade.gov.*                     The closing period for their receipt is February 12, 2024. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to February 27, 2024.                

                    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection in the “Online FTZ Information Section” section of the FTZ Board's website, which is accessible via                     *www.trade.gov/​ftz.*

                    For further information, contact Camille Evans at                     *Camille.Evans@trade.gov.*

Dated: December 28, 2023.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-28910 Filed 1-2-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
# C_2009032EN.01004601.xml

| 7.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/46

---

Action brought on 1 December 2008 — Agatha Ruiz de la Prada de Sentmenat v OHIM — Mary Quant Cosmetics Japan (AGATHA RUIZ DE LA PRADA)

(Case T-523/08)

(2009/C 32/88)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Agatha Ruiz de la Prada de Sentmenat (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: R. Bercovitz Álvarez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Mary Quant Cosmetics Japan Ltd (Tokyo, Japan)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Paragraphs 1 and 3 of the contested decision be annulled and replaced with a different decision in which registration of Community trade mark No 3.291.234 is granted in respect of all the goods requested in Class 3 of the Classification (including ‘soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions’) and MARY QUANT Cosmetics Japan Ltd. be ordered to pay the costs of the opposition proceedings, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Paragraphs 1 and 3 of the contested decision be annulled and replaced with a different decision in which registration of Community trade mark No 3.291.234 is granted in respect of all the goods requested in Class 3 of the Classification (including ‘soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions’) and MARY QUANT Cosmetics Japan Ltd. be ordered to pay the costs of the opposition proceedings, and

| — | the defendant, and any intervening or other party, be ordered to pay the costs of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

the defendant, and any intervening or other party, be ordered to pay the costs of the present proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Agatha Ruiz de la Prada de Sentmenat

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark representing a pink flower with a yellow centre on a light green background with the wording AGATHA RUIZ DE LA PRADA (application No 3.291.234) for goods in, inter alia, Classes 3, 5, 14 and 21.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: MARY QUANT Cosmetics Japan Ltd.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative mark representing a black flower with a black centre surrounded by a white outline: British trade marks for goods in Classes 3 and 5, and a Community trade mark for goods in Classes 3 and 21.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition was rejected.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was upheld in part.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Incorrect application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark.

Pleas in law:

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 5, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 27, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 40 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-148, CP2024-154.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-29018 Filed 1-4-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Grafe, Jerome (PEP) 

Subject: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

From: Tina St. Gelais [tinastgelais@yahoo.com] 

Monday, September 24, 2012 1:08 PM 

Grafe, Jerome (DEP) 

Fichter, Katherine (DOT) 

Blue/red line connector 

I am writing to urge you to support the final design and construction of the Red-Blue Connector between 

Bowdoin and Charles Street stations in Boston. 

I find that East Boston residents continue to be cut out of the equation, however, endure the most impacts. I am 

a proud community activist and I want my town to flourish but we need help. We need connections to the rest of 

the city so that people want to move here and generate East Boston's economy. Connect us. Give us the 

opportunity to reduce car travellers on our streets. Afterall, we endure so much, the Airport, the airport shuttles, 

proposed ethanol trains, proposed casino, the gas tanks, the gas tankers, the tolls. East Boston residents deserve 

this. Give us the chance to bring more people to our local economy and the ability to have residents to bring the 

economy home. Please do not scrap plans, we are always pushed aside. Let us be the next "Innovation District" 

or the other "Central Square". We are depending on this connection, do what is right for East Boston. 

Thank you, 

Tina St. Gelais-Kelly 

l
A poverty rate is the ratio of the persons below the poverty level 

to the total number of persons for whom poverty status has been 

determined. The map uses natural breaks in the distribution to 

organize the data into groups of common values. 

Map Created: March 2016

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 

American Community Survey, 2010–2014

Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2010–2014

(County Rates)

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

28.0% - 44.3%

21.2% - 27.9%

15.8% - 21.1%

7.1% - 15.7%

Poverty Rate 

(Natural Breaks Classification) 

U.S. average = 15.6%

Appalachian average = 17.2%
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: APPOINTMENT OF

ACTING PRESIDENT JUDGE

OF THE FIFTY-NINTH JUDICIAL 

DISTRICT, ELK AND CAMERON 

COUNTIES

:

:

:

:

:

No. 353 Judicial Classification Docket

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2018, upon the retirement of the 

Honorable Richard A. Masson, President Judge of the Fifty-Ninth Judicial District, 

Elk and Cameron Counties, effective December 31, 2018, pursuant to Article V, 

Section 10(a) of the Pennsylvania Constitution, the Honorable John H. Foradora 

is hereby appointed acting President Judge of the Fifty-Ninth Judicial District, Elk 

and Cameron Counties, effective January 1, 2019, until the judicial vacancy in that 

District is filled or until further Order of this Court.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1562]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

        TRIBUTE TO THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL HISTORICAL SOCIETY

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. NORMAN D. DICKS

                             of washington

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 19, 2012

  Mr. DICKS. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to the United 
States Capitol Historical Society, which is celebrating 50 years of 
history and service to the United States Capitol.
  Congressman Fred Schwengel, Senator Hubert Humphrey, and a group of 
15 other Members of Congress, historians, and civic and business 
leaders organized the United States Capitol Historical Society on July 
17, 1962. Fifty years later, the USCHS continues to fulfill its mission 
by teaching the public about the founding, growth and significance of 
the Capitol of the United States as a tangible symbol of its 
representative form of government.
  Convinced that an understanding of history was inextricably linked 
with responsible citizenship, the founders of the United States Capitol 
Historical Society adopted a mission statement committing the 
nonprofit, nonpartisan, educational organization to the role of 
``history teacher to the nation.''
  More than 50 years after its founding, the Society continues to 
develop new and creative ways to bring the fascinating story of the 
Capitol to the public's attention. Among its tools are educational 
tours, scholarly symposia, observances of historic events, enhancement 
and preservation of the Capitol's collection of art and artifacts, 
sponsorship of research, the sale of publications and mementos of an 
historical nature, and assistance to Congressional and other Capitol 
offices.
  The partnership of the USCHS with the National Archives and Old Town 
Trolley in the We the People Constitution program is particularly 
innovative. The Society has committed to working toward seeing every 
eighth grade student in the Washington, DC public schools tour 
``monumental'' Washington to learn about the U.S. Constitution. This 
educational tour's sole purpose is to help students understand their 
place in American history and their role in the process of government.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask my colleagues to join me in honoring a great 
organization dedicated to preserving the history of the most 
recognizable symbol of representative government in the world, the 
United States Capitol.

                          ____________________
```
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4685 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

515 Hope Street in Bristol, Rhode Island, as the ‘‘First Sergeant P. 

Andrew McKenna Jr. Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2017 

Mr. CICILLINE (for himself and Mr. LANGEVIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 515 Hope Street in Bristol, Rhode Island, 

as the ‘‘First Sergeant P. Andrew McKenna Jr. Post 

Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FIRST SERGEANT P. ANDREW MCKENNA JR. 

4 POST OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 515 Hope Street in Bristol, 

7 Rhode Island, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘First 

8 Sergeant P. Andrew McKenna Jr. Post Office’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4685 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘First Sergeant P. 

5 Andrew McKenna Jr. Post Office’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roberto Ceballos, Appellant.

Mercure, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Vogt, J.), rendered December 5, 1988, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

The sole contention raised by defendant on this appeal is that County Court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized as the result of an allegedly impermissible stop of his vehicle. We disagree. Police Officers Bart Rasnick and John Calvello each testified at the hearing on the motion that, prior to stopping defendant’s vehicle, they caused a computer check to be made of defendant’s license plate number and of the registered owner of the vehicle, the response indicated that the New York driving privileges of the owner had been suspended and it was for this reason that the vehicle was stopped. This testimony, credited by County Court, provided an adequate factual basis for its determination that the officers reasonably suspected that defendant violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 (1), a permissible basis for the stop of defendant’s vehicle *(see, People v Ingle,*36 NY2d 413, 414). Evidence of an alternative ground for the stop and inconsistencies in Calvello’s testimony merely created an issue of credibility for County Court, whose findings should not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous *(see, People v Rivera,*68 NY2d 786; *People v Goodrich,*126 AD2d 835, *lv denied*69 NY2d 880). "This is not a case where testimony is so flawed that findings as to a witness’s credibility made from the unique perspective of the trier of fact must be overridden” *(People v Rivera, supra,*at 788 [citations omitted]).

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Levine and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 125 (Monday, September 17, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6391]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 Senate

Monday, September 17, 2012
  The Senate met at 2 and 13 seconds p.m., and was called to order by 
the Honorable Christopher Coons, a Senator from the State of Delaware.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6023]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              WELCOME BACK

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I welcome everyone back, the staff and 
Presiding Officer. I hope everyone had a restful and productive month. 
I look forward to this work period, which will be very short and exact, 
and I hope we can accomplish a few things.

                          ____________________
```
# Claiborne - Appalachian Regional Commission

- East Tennessee Development District Executive Director Rick Yakubic Email &#114;&#x79;&#97;&#x6b;&#117;&#x62;&#105;&#x63;&#64;&#x65;t&#x64;d&#x2e;o&#114;&#x67;The post East Tennessee Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5869]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    WELCOMING REVEREND MATTHEW MELLO

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Without objection, the gentleman from 
Florida (Mr. Ross) is recognized for 1 minute.
  There was no objection.
  Mr. ROSS of Florida. Mr. Speaker, I wanted to take a brief moment to 
say thank you to today's chaplain. I would also like to thank the 
Speaker for making this possible.
  The invocation today was offered by Father Matthew Mello of 
Resurrection Catholic Church in my hometown of Lakeland, Florida.
  Mr. Speaker, in 1963, my mother and father helped found the church 
Father Mello calls home. And like my parents and most Floridians, 
Father Mello is a geographic mutt: born in New Jersey, attended grade 
school in Puerto Rico, went to high school in Florida, attended 
seminary in Indiana, and studied theology in Chicago.
  We don't know if he's a Yankees fan, a Cubs fan, or a White Sox fan. 
But one thing's for certain: since 1998, Father Mello has been a 
constant and reassuring presence in the spiritual life of countless 
residents of my hometown and to my family. His presence in my dad's 
final year of life was a comfort to him as well as to my family.
  Father Mello personifies Christ's instruction to us to be the 
``servant of all.'' I firmly believe, as the Bible also says, ``that 
the fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much.'' Knowing Father 
Mello, I have no doubt that today's prayer was heard on high.
  I thank him for his prayer today and his lifetime of service.

                          ____________________
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1833
S. REBECCA DACHMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA97-4352-PJM) Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 18, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. S. Rebecca Dachman, Appellant Pro Se. George Levi Russell, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:S. Rebecca Dachman appeals the district court’s order dismissing this civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dachman v. United States , No. CA-97-4352-PJM (D. Md. May 5, 1998). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43956 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43957 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43958 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43959 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43960 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43961 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43962 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43963 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43964 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43965 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43966 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43967 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43968 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43969 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43970 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43971 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43972 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43973 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43974 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43975 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43976 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43977 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43978 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43979 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43980 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43981 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43982 1994
HeinOnline -- 59 Fed. Reg. 43983 1994