alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4858 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4858

    To clarify section 224 of the Communications Act of 1934 as not 
limiting the ability of a State to adopt a one touch make ready policy 
             for pole attachments, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2018

Ms. Eshoo (for herself and Mr. McKinley) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To clarify section 224 of the Communications Act of 1934 as not 
limiting the ability of a State to adopt a one touch make ready policy 
             for pole attachments, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clearing Local Impediments Makes 
Broadband Open to New Competition and Enhancements'' or the ``CLIMB 
ONCE Act''.

SEC. 2. STATE ADOPTION OF ONE TOUCH MAKE READY POLICY FOR POLE 
              ATTACHMENTS.

    (a) Construction.--Nothing in section 224 of the Communications Act 
of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 224) or the implementing rules of the Federal 
Communications Commission shall be construed to limit the ability of a 
State to adopt a one touch make ready policy with respect to pole 
attachments.
    (b) Development of Model Policy.--Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Commission shall publish 
recommendations on best practices, including a model policy, relating 
to the implementation of a one touch make ready policy by a State.
    (c) Definitions.-- In this section:
            (1) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal 
        Communications Commission.
            (2) One touch make ready policy.--The term ``one touch make 
        ready policy'' means, with respect to the addition or 
        modification of a pole attachment, regulations relating to the 
        activity undertaken in order to prepare the pole, duct, 
        conduit, or right-of-way for the addition of a new attachment 
        including the ability of an attacher to perform all make ready 
        work in a single trip to the pole and a requirement of the 
        designation by a pole owner or utility of a list of at least 
        two approved contractors for each pole, duct, conduit, or 
        right-of-way to perform all such activity.
            (3) Pole attachment; state; utility.--The terms ``pole 
        attachment'', ``State'', and ``utility'' have the meanings 
        given those terms in section 224(a) of the Communications Act 
        of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 224(a)).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6335-S6336]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         WORLD WAR II VETERANS

  Mr. TESTER. Mr. President, On September 23, nearly 100 World War II 
veterans from Montana will be visiting our Nation's Capital.
  With a great deal of honor and respect, I extend a hearty Montana 
welcome to each and every one of them.
  Together, they will visit the World War II Memorial and share stories 
about their service. This journey will

[[Page S6336]]

no doubt bring about a lot of memories. I hope it will give them a deep 
sense of pride also.
  What they achieved together almost 70 years ago was remarkable. That 
memorial is a testament to the fact that a grateful nation will never 
forget what they did nor what they sacrificed. To us, they were the 
greatest generation. They left the comforts of their family and their 
communities to confront evil from Iwo Jima to Bastogne. Together, they 
won the war in the Pacific by conquering an empire and liberated a 
continent by defeating Hitler and the Nazis.
  To them, they were simply doing their jobs. They enlisted in 
unprecedented numbers to defend our freedoms and our values. They 
represented the very best of us and made us proud.
  From a young age I remember playing the bugle at the memorial 
services of veterans of the first two world wars. It instilled in me a 
profound sense of respect I will never forget.
  Honoring the service of every generation of American veterans is a 
Montana value. I deeply appreciate the work of the Big Sky Honor 
Flight, a nonprofit organization that made this trip and the first trip 
in June possible.
  To the World War II veterans making the trip, I salute you. We will 
always be grateful, and we will never forget your service or sacrifice.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.2

                               JO-ANN STORES, INC.

       LIST OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO ARE PARTIES TO THE SPLIT DOLLAR LIFE
                     INSURANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE REGISTRANT



          Dave Bolen
          Brian Carney
          Valerie Gentile Sachs
          Rosalind Thompson
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-116834, 333-100309, 333-72466, 333-64054, 333-38346,333-66347, 333-20539 and Form S-3 No. 118406) of Wild Oats Markets, Inc., of our reportdated March 31, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Wild OatsMarkets, Inc., included in this Annual report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended January 1,2005.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Denver, Colorado

March 31, 2005
Exhibit 21



Subsidiaries of Bedford Property Investors, Inc.





|Subsidiary Name                               |  | State of Organization
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                                              |  |                      
|1.  Bedford Laguna Hills Square SPE, Inc.     |  | Arizona              
|2.  Bedford Petaluma SPE, Inc.                |  | Arizona              
|3.  Bedford Village Green SPE, Inc.           |  | Arizona              
|4.  Bedford Philips Business Center SPE, Inc. |  | Arizona              
|5.  Bedford Phoenix Tech Center SPE, Inc.     |  | Arizona              
|6.  Bedford Rio Salado SPE, Inc.              |  | Arizona              
|7.  Bedford Federal Way II LLC                |  | California           
|8.  Bedford Towne Centre Plaza LLC            |  | California           
|9.  Bedford Waterpark LLC                     |  | California           
|10.  Time Square Services, Inc.               |  | Maryland
# C_2008272EN.01003404.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/34

---

Action brought on 12 August 2008 — Società di armatori G. padre dei F.lli Incorvaia G.I. e S. v Commission

(Case T-317/08)

(2008/C 272/65)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Società di armamento Gaetano padre dei fratelli Incorvaia Giuseppe, Ignazio e Salvatore Snc (Licata, Italy) (represented by: A. Maiorana, A. de Matteis and A. De Francesco, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Commission Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 of 12 June 2008, published in OJ L 155 of 13 June 2008. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Commission Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 of 12 June 2008, published in OJ L 155 of 13 June 2008.

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those relied on in Case T-313/08 Veromar di Tudisco Alfio & Salvatore S.n.c v Commission.

Veromar di Tudisco Alfio & Salvatore S.n.c

Commission

---
# Pickens - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Northwest Georgia Regional Commission Executive Director Boyd Austin Email &#x62;&#97;u&#x73;&#116;i&#x6e;&#64;n&#x77;&#103;r&#x63;&#46;o&#x72;&#103;The post Northwest Georgia Regional Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          65,642
<SECURITIES>                                    66,021
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,065
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,254
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               204,659
<PP&E>                                          20,993
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,401
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,604
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                     181,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,769
<SALES>                                         70,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,749
<CGS>                                           35,780
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,033
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,249)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,185
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,811
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,374
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,374
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15


</TABLE>
# Monroe - Appalachian Regional Commission

- TEAMing Up: A Regional Partnership Story This story is one of several "Stories of Change" highlighted in a new evaluation of ARC's POWER Initiative. The post TEAMing Up: A Regional Partnership Story appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Buckeye Hills Regional Council Executive Director Chasity Schmelzenbach Email &#99;&#x73;&#104;&#x6d;e&#x6c;z&#101;&#x6e;&#98;&#x61;c&#x68;&#64;&#98;&#x75;&#99;&#x6b;e&#x79;e&#104;&#x69;&#108;&#x6c;s&#x2e;o&#114;&#x67;The post Buckeye Hills Regional Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the report of Wild Oats Markets, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended January 1, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof Edward F. Dunlap hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                            
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained
    in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.











|/s/ Edward F. Dunlap | 
|-------------------- | 
|Edward F. Dunlap     | 
|April 27, 2005       | 







This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or otherwise subject to
liability pursuant to that section. The certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Wild Oats Markets, Inc. and will be retained by Wild Oats Markets, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6004]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  0910
                              JOB TRAINING

  (Mr. CLARKE of Michigan asked and was given permission to address the 
House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. CLARKE of Michigan. Mr. Speaker, yesterday I met a young 
entrepreneur who owns a remanufacturing business headquartered in Metro 
Detroit. In spite of his success, he faces one major challenge--he 
can't hire enough people with the skills necessary to rebuild the 
products that could be sold around the world. So that's why I ask this 
House, this Congress, to stay in session to do our work so that we can 
train our people, especially our young people, for the jobs that exist 
in this country that are going unfilled; train them with the skills 
that they need to sell and rebuild the best products that can be sold 
worldwide. This is how we can create more jobs in our economy and make 
the United States an even stronger contributor to our world.

                          ____________________
```
January 22, 2015 

Paul Gretch 

Director 

Office of International Aviation 

Department of Transportation 

120 I New Jersey A venue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

And 

Robert Finamore Division Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing 

Office oflnternational Aviation 

Department of Transportation 

120 I New Jersey A venue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Director Gretch and Division Chief Finamore, 

Mineta San Jose International Airport (SJC) just confirmed that Hainan Airlines filed its 

formal request for a Foreign Air Carrier Permit and associated exemption authority with 

the United States Department of Transportation to operate nonstop Beijing-San Jose 

passenger service. As Director for the San Jose International Airport, we are very 

supportive of this submittal and urge the Department to approve Hainan's application. 

The greater San Jose/Silicon Valley region, comprising a total population of 

approximately three million residents, is one of the nation's highest profile and most 

ethnically-diverse metropolitan area with personal and economic ties across the globe. 

The local Chinese population of more than 220,000 is one of the very largest in the 

United States, reflecting the substantial and expanding cultural relationship between these 

two dynamic regions. 

San Jose International will be a natural gateway for nonstop flights between Beijing, 

China and the Silicon Valley, providing critical access and greatly enhanced travel 

options. Our region as a \vhole has significant business and personal links to China and 

that nation's continued economic growth will further strengthen those ties in the years 

ahead. 

1701 Airport Boulevard, Suite B-1130 • San Jose, CA 95110-1206 • Tel408.392.3b00 • Fax 408.441.4 591 • \WII'J.flysanjose.com 

SAN jOSE 

t 'AI Tl:\1 ( lf- \:\ll.LY 
overall economy, our progressive region continues to expand on a vvorldwide basis and 

relies on high quality commercial air service. 

Research has shown that Silicon Valley companies have over 500 locations throughout 

China, and (our organization) is certainly among those with a growing focus on 

developing business across Asia. The China market in particular is an important and 

growing element of our international business, and Hainan's proposed nonstop flights to 

Beijing ·with connections to other Chinese cities 'Nill provide greater opportunities for 

travel by businesses, students, families, and individuals. 

Hainan Airlines and its proposed Boeing 787 Dreamliner service is an ideal fit for the 

very dynamic Silicon Valley market and will no doubt be highly successful in this 

venture. San Jose International is very supportive ofHainan's proposed Beijing-San Jose 

service and we fully recommend U.S. Depat1ment ofTransportation approval of their 

route application. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Kim Becker Aguirre 

Director of Aviation 

SAN jOSE 

s 1 L 1 co 11 vAL L E v • s A 1 R Po R r 1701 Airport Suae !!· 1130 • San Jose, CA 95110·1206 • Tel408.392.3600 • Fax 408.441.4591 • w:::1.flysanjose.com "=
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ricky Singh, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), imposed January 17, 1986, upon his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree and robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being concurrent indeterminate terms of *8 Vs*to 25 years imprisonment for manslaughter in the first degree and 12 *Vi*to 25 years imprisonment for robbery in the first degree.

Ordered that the sentence is modified, on the law, by reducing the minimum term of imprisonment for robbery in the first degree from 12 *Vi*years to *8 Vs*years; as so modified, the sentence is affirmed.

As the People concede, the crime of robbery in the first degree *(see,*Penal Law § 160.15 [1]) is not an armed violent felony offense *(see,*CPL 1.20 [41]; Penal Law § 70.02 [4]; *People v Frawley,*117 AD2d 613). The sentence of an indeterminate term of 12 *Vz*to 25 years imprisonment imposed by the County Court was, therefore, illegal, and must be modified. Since the intent of the court was to impose the maximum sentence available under the law, we may substitute the maximum legal sentence for this crime and need not direct a resentencing *(see, People v Persaud,*166 AD2d 466). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Kooper, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

September 24 , 2019
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 19

- 00615

- CV

SAVVAS STEFANIDES , Appellant

V.
MARILYN STEFANIDES , Appellee
On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 04758

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a n order signed July 17, 2019. On September 10, 2019, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. Accordingly, th e app eal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Ch ristopher, Spain, and Hassan

.
Order entered July 9, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 13 - 01752 - CV STUTZ ROAD LIMITED P ARTNERSHIP , ET AL. , Appellant s V. WEEKLEY HOMES, L.P. D/B/A DAVID WEEKLEY HOMES, ET AL . , Appellee s On Appeal from the Count y Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 10 - 01696 - B 

### O RDER We GRANT the July 2, 2014 third motion of appellant Len

- Mac Development Corp. for an extension of time to file a brief. We ORDER the brief tendered to this Court by Len

- Mac Development Corp. on July 8, 2014 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alberto Alejandro, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (West, J.), rendered July 15, 1988, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant maintains that the prosecutor’s opening statement to the jury was legally deficient and, thus, the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment at the close of that statement. We disagree. The facts set forth by the prosecutor in his opening statement sufficiently apprised the jury of the prospective evidence to be offered to establish the crimes of which the defendant was convicted, namely, murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree *(see, Matter of Timothy L.,*71 NY2d 835; *People v Tzatzimakis,*150 AD2d 512; *see generally, De Vito v Katsch,*157 AD2d 413, 419-420). Accordingly, the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment was properly denied.

We further find that the trial court’s "natural and probable consequences” charge on the issue of intent did not violate *Sandstrom v Montana*(442 US 510). The court instructed the jury that it "may infer, that a person intends the natural, reasonable and probable consequences of his act” *(People v Renzulli,*100 AD2d 945). In addition, the court instructed the jury that intent "exists when a person has a conscious objective to cause the act with which he is charged,” and advised the jury that "the burden is on the People to prove the intent of the defendant, beyond a reasonable doubt”. Thus, the charge, read as a whole, did not violate the principles set forth in *Sandstrom v Montana*(442 US 510, *supra; see also, People v Smith,*87 AD2d 640).

The defendant next claims that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied his request for the imposition of a sanction based on the failure of two detectives to preserve their notes, which allegedly constituted *Rosario*material. The claim is without merit. "Pursuant to *People v Rosario*(9 NY2d 286[, *cert denied*368 US 866]), the prosecution is required to turn over any pretrial statement made by a prosecution witness relating to the subject matter of the witness’s testimony” *(People v Williams,*165 AD2d 839, 840). Since the two detectives did not testify at trial, their notes were not *Rosario*material, and the defendant was not entitled to them *(see, People v Gardner,*162 AD2d 466).

*874We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Eiber, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

EXHIBIT 32.1

I, Craig H. Barratt, the chief executive officer of Atheros Communications, Inc.
(the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,:



|(i) | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 1, 2008



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Craig H. Barratt                                               
|Craig H. Barratt                                                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)