alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 126 (Tuesday, September 18, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1549]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         NO MORE SOLYNDRAS ACT

                                 ______
                                 

                               speech of

                         HON. CHRIS VAN HOLLEN

                              of maryland

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 14, 2012

       The House in Committee of the Whole House on the state of 
     the Union had under consideration the bill (H.R. 6213) to 
     limit further taxpayer exposure from the loan guarantee 
     program established under title XVII of the Energy Policy Act 
     of 2005:

  Mr. VAN HOLLEN. Mr. Chair, contrary to all the rhetoric around this 
legislation, H.R. 6213 does not terminate the Title 17 loan guarantee 
program. In fact, when Republicans were offered a chance to end this 
Bush-era initiative in the Energy and Commerce Committee, the motion 
failed by a vote of 3-39.
  Instead, H.R. 6213 retains the $34 billion of existing loan guarantee 
authority--and then arbitrarily limits the competition for that 
authority to the roughly 50 projects that had submitted their 
applications before the end of 2011. In other words, under this bill, a 
loan guarantee commitment can be issued in 2020 to a company that 
applied in 2010--but any better, cheaper or more promising proposal 
that arises between now and then need not apply.
  This is the worst kind of governing by bumper sticker, and it has 
unfortunately become emblematic of the Republican majority in the 112th 
Congress.
  Mr. Chair, we can and should be investing in clean energy. We simply 
cannot afford to cede this rapidly growing market to the Chinese and 
other international competitors. In that regard, the Title 17 loan 
guarantee program has caused tens of billions of dollars in private 
capital to be invested in clean energy projects. It has helped double 
renewable energy generation. It has created 60,000 jobs and saved over 
300 million gallons of gasoline. And it has done all of this with a 
default rate of 3 percent, which is less than the half the default rate 
in the federal student loan program whose current interest rates a 
bipartisan majority in this House recently voted to extend.
  It is time to stop demagoguing and time to start governing. I urge a 
no vote.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 99]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28826]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES

Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules; Hearing of the Judicial 
Conference

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules; notice of cancellation 
of open hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the 
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure has been canceled: Appellate Rules 
Hearing on January 24, 2024.

DATES: January 24, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: H. Thomas Byron III, Esq., Chief 
Counsel, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. 
Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus 
Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-1820, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The announcement for this hearing was 
previously published in the Federal Register on August 9, 2023 at 88 FR 
53917.

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

    Dated: December 27, 2023.
Shelly L. Cox,
Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2023-28826 Filed 12-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
```
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Allied Holdings, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-72053, No. 333-51104, No. 333-62440, No. 333-91942, No. 333-107455 and
333-124203) on Form S-8 of Allied Holdings, Inc. of our report dated June 16,
2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Allied Holdings, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' (deficit) equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005,
and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the Allied
Holdings, Inc. 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
June 16, 2006
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Huntington Preferred
Capital, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Michael J. McMennamin, President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

                                          /s/  Michael J. McMennamin
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                             Michael J. McMennamin, President
                                              (chief executive officer)
                                              November 14, 2002
#### Application of Garnie Eugene KNIGHT, Doyle Eugene Hulsey and Jimmy Hicks for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

No. A-12267.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Oct. 12, 1955.

Frank Grayson, Oklahoma City, for petitioners.

Granville Scanland, County Atty., Tom-Hamill, Asst. County Atty., Oklahoma City, for'respondent.

JONES, Presiding Judge.

This is an original action in> habeas corpus by the petitioners, Garnie Eugene Knight, Doyle Eugene Hulsey and Jimmy Hicks, in which they ask this court to fix a reasonable bond for their appearance at a preliminary examination before a justice of the peace to answer a charge of assault with a dangerous weapon there pending against them. This is a companion case to Ex parte Sanders No. A-12,266, Okl.Cr., 289 P.2d 155, and was consolidated with that case for the purpose of presentation of evidence at the time of the hearing on said petition. The facts in both cases are substantially the same and were the outgrowth of labor difficulties in the City of Oklahoma City. What we have said in the disposition of Case No. A-12,266 equally applies to this case.

It is therefore ordered that the appearance bond of .each of the petitioners be and the same is hereby fixed in the sum of $2,-000, said bond to be conditioned as provided by law and approved by the justice of the peace before whom the preliminary complaint is pending.

BRETT and POWELL, JJ., concur.-
[750 NYS2d 737]

#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v Thomas O'Brien, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Richmond County,

October 10, 2002

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Thomas O’Brien,*defendant *pro se. William L. Murphy, District Attorney (Anne Crick*of counsel), for plaintiff.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stephen Rooney, J.

On May 23, 2000, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree in full satisfaction of Indictment No. 84 of 1999. The defendant moves to seal, pursuant to CPL 160.50, charges that were dismissed from the indictment prior to entry of his guilty plea.

CPL 160.50, entitled “Order upon termination of criminal action in favor of the accused,” creates a statutory right for an accused person to have records sealed when a criminal action or proceeding is terminated in favor of the accused. In a discussion of the legislative objective underlying the enactment of CPL 160.50, the Court in *People v Patterson*(78 NY2d 711, 716 *501[1991]) stated that the “over-all scheme of the enactments demonstrates that the legislative objective was to remove any ‘stigma’ flowing from an accusation of criminal conduct terminated in favor of the accused, thereby affording protection (i.e., the presumption of innocence) to such accused in the pursuit of employment, education, professional licensing and insurance opportunities.” However, this statutorily conferred right is only available when a criminal action or proceeding is terminated in favor of the accused. CPL 160.50 (3) (a) through *(l)*define when a criminal action or proceeding shall be considered terminated in favor of the accused. Subdivision (3), insofar as it applies to this motion, reveals that a favorable termination refers only to dismissals of entire accusatory instruments. By pleading guilty to one count of the indictment, the defendant accepted the collateral consequences which flow from a felony conviction, including the fact that the conviction and court records are matters of public record. CPL 160.50 does not provide relief for partial dismissals, such as the petitioner is requesting here. Therefore, defendant’s motion is denied.

The defendant also moves for an order directing the Division of Criminal Justice Services to correct defendant’s criminal history by removing all references to burglary in the first degree under Indictment Nos. 84 and 271 of 1999. The People concede that references to burglary in the first degree were caused by a typographical error in Indictment No. 271 of 1999 and join in defendant’s motion. Inasmuch as the Division of Criminal Justice Services has already corrected defendant’s criminal history and the indictment was amended on the record to reflect the accurate charge, the issue is moot and no court order is necessary.
# Notes

An Economic Analysis of the Appalachian Coal Industry EcosystemWest Virginia University and the University of Tennessee  January 2018Report DataThere are five reports in this series: An Overview of the Coal Economy in Appalachia; County-level CIE Supply Chain Analysis; Transportation Implications of Coal; The Economic Impacts and Risks Associated with Electric Power Generation in Appalachia; and Human Capital and the CIE. The Coal Industry Ecosystem (CIE) is characterized by the relationship and interdependence among coal mining, its supply chain linkages, transportation services, coal-fired power plants, and human capital resources.This file contains information on whether a county is above or below the Appalachian median for the following measures: Dependence, Impact, and Risk. More detailed information is found in the County-level CIE Supply Chain Analysis report. Dependence: The Dependence measure is the sum of coal-dependent employees divided by total employment in each county. This measure is presented for both 2005 and 2015. See Figure 2 and Figure 3 in the County-level CIE Supply Chain Analysis report. Impact: The Impact measure is the sum of the employment change-weighted CIE scores as a share of total employment, where employment change is defined as the difference between 2005 and 2015 employment.  See Figure 6 in the County-level CIE Supply Chain Analysis report. Risk: The Risk measure quantifies the degree to which counties are at risk of experiencing additional economic hardship should the decline in the coal industry continue. See Figure 9 in the County-level CIE Supply Chain Analysis report. Funding for this project was provided by the Appalachian Regional Commission. Researchers at West Virginia University and the University of Tennessee prepared these reports.  

# Dependence_2005

# Dependence_2015

# Impact

# Risk
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H6000-H6001]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. WALSH of Illinois:
       H.R. 6408.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 4, Clause 1: The Times, Places, and 
     Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, 
     shall be prescribed by each state by the legislature

[[Page H6001]]

     thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or such 
     Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
```
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Cathy Persin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of VOYAGER PETROLEUM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15-(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.





DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2007            /S/ CATHY PERSIN
                                   -----------------------------------
                                   CATHY PERSIN
                                   CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Director Compensation Summary



 Exhibit 10.18 
  
 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY 
  
 Our directors, who are not employed by USA Risk Group (Bermuda), Ltd., the management company, receive an annual retainer of $15,000. They are also paid
$750 per half day for each board meeting and $175 per hour for each committee meeting attended during the calendar year. All of our officer positions are filled by directors without any salary or other compensation. Directors are entitled to receive
reimbursement for expenses incurred in attending board or committee meetings or when otherwise acting on our behalf. The chairman of the board, as well as the chairman of each committee, excluding nominating and underwriting, receive an annual
retainer of $5,000, and the members of the underwriting, actuarial and reinsurance committee, excluding Mr. Grayston, receive an annual retainer of $2,500 each.
(OCTOBER 1, 2019–SEPTEMBER 30, 2020)

ALABAMA STATE PROFILE | FISCAL YEAR 2020

35 PROJECTS

$6.8M TOTAL ARC 

INVESTMENT

$122.5M ADDITIONAL PRIVATE

INVESTMENTS

LEVERAGED

FISCAL YEAR 2020 INVESTMENT SNAPSHOT

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

invested in Alabama’s critical 

$1.6M

infrastructure development, including 

broadband, transportation, and 

water/wastewater systems

FISCAL YEAR 2020 INVESTMENT PRIORITIES

450 JOBS CREATED 

OR RETAINED

1,750 STUDENTS AND 

WORKERS TRAINED 

AND EDUCATED

READY WORKFORCE

invested to increase the education, 

$2.9M

knowledge, skills, and health of 

Alabama’s Appalachian residents 

to work and succeed

LEADERSHIP & COMMUNITY CAPACITY

invested to build the capacity and skills 

$1.1M

of Appalachia’s current and next-generation 

leaders and organizations in Alabama 

to advance community and 

economic development

ADDITIONAL PRIORITIES

invested in entrepreneurial strategies 

$1.2M

to strengthen the economy and 

leverage natural and cultural 

assets in Alabama

APPALACHIAN REGIONAL COMMISSION | LEARN MORE: ARC.GOV/ALABAMA

FY 2020 COUNTY ECONOMIC STATUS IN ALABAMA

Levels of

Economic Status

Distressed County

At-Risk County

Transitional County

Competitive County

Attainment County
================================================================================

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tari Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
   respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  March 13, 2007


/s/ Theodore Tsagkaris

------------------------------
Theodore Tsagkaris
Secretary, Treasurer & C.F.O.
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4757 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4757

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to modify the appointment process for 
                  presidents of Federal Reserve Banks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2018

Mr. Pittenger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Reserve Act to modify the appointment process for 
                  presidents of Federal Reserve Banks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fully Informed District Bank Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO APPOINTMENT OF PRESIDENTS OF FEDERAL RESERVE 
              BANKS.

    The fifth subparagraph of the fourth undesignated paragraph of 
section 4 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 341) is amended by 
striking ``Class B and Class C directors'' and inserting ``board of 
directors''.
                                 <all>
```
|  | (A) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))      and |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (B) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the  Report. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |   |   |                      |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|  February 26, 2010 |   | /s/    | Frank E. Fusco            |
| Dated                   |   |   | Frank      E. Fusco  |

----
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the report of Wild Oats Markets, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Perry D. Odak hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                            
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained
    in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.











|/s/ Perry D. Odak | 
|----------------- | 
|Perry D. Odak     | 
|February 28, 2006 | 





Chief Executive Officer





This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or otherwise subject to
liability pursuant to that section. The certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Wild Oats Markets, Inc. and will be retained by Wild Oats Markets, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.