Final 

Second Quarter 2013 - Quarterly 

Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Outside Tunnel Wells 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

DOH Facility ID: 9-102271 

DOH Release ID: 990051, 010011, and 020028 

July 2013 

Department of the Navy 

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH, HI 96860-3139 

Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853, CTO 0002 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Final 

Second Quarter 2013 - Quarterly 

Groundwater Monitoring Report 

Outside Tunnel Wells 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

DOH Facility ID: 9-102271 

DOH Release ID: 990051, 010011, and 020028 

July 2013

Prepared for: 

Department of the Navy 

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH, HI 96860-3139 

Prepared by: 

Environmental Science International, Inc. 

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304 

Kailua, HI 96734 

Prepared under: 

Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853, CTO 0002
This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report Page v July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

FINAL 

SECOND QUARTER 2013 - QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT 

OUTSIDE TUNNEL WELLS 

RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY

Long-Term Groundwater and Soil Vapor Monitoring 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

Joint-Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, Hawaii 

Prepared for: 

Department of the Navy 

Commanding Officer, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii 

400 Marshall Road 

JBPHH, HI 96860-3139 

Prepared by: 

Environmental Science International, Inc. 

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304 

Kailua, HI 96734 

(808) 261-0740 

Prepared under: 

Contract Number: N62742-12-D-1853 

Contract Task Order: 0002 

Approval Signature: 

 Darren Uchima, Navy Technical Representative Date 

Approval Signature: 7/2/2013 

 Robert Chong, ESI Project Manager Date 

 

Approval Signature: 7/2/2013 

 Iris van der Zander, ESI QA Manager Date 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report Page vi July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report Page vii July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Section Title Page

ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1

 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1

1.1 Site Description 1-1

1.2 Physical Settings 1-2

1.3 Background 1-3

 

2.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 2-1

2.1 Groundwater Sampling 2-1

2.2 Analytical Results 2-1

2.3 Waste Disposal 2-2

3.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT 3-1

3.1 Data Validation and Assessment 3-1

3.2 Data Assessment and Usability Conclusions 3-3

 

4.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4-1

5.0 FUTURE WORK 5-1

 

6.0 REFERENCES 6-1
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report Page viii July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

LIST OF TABLES 

Number Title Page

1.1 Current Status of USTs 1-2

2.1 Analytical Results for Groundwater Sampling (April 24, 2013) 2-3

3.1 Quality Control Results for Groundwater Sampling (April 24, 2013) 3-5

 

 

LIST OF FIGURES 

Number Title 

1 Site Location 

2 Site Layout 

 

 

APPENDICES 

Appendix Title 

A Groundwater Sampling Logs 

B Field Notes 

C Laboratory Reports 

D Historical Groundwater Exceedance Trends 

E Waste Disposal Manifest 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report Page ix July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 

ACRONYMS/ 

ABBREVIATIONS DEFINITION/MEANING 

% percent 

COPC Contaminant of Potential Concern 

DLNR State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources 

DOH State of Hawaii Department of Health 

DON Department of the Navy 

EAL Environmental Action Level 

EPA Environmental Protection Agency 

ESI Environmental Science International 

F-76 Marine Diesel Fuel 

ID Identification 

JBPHH Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam 

JP-5 Jet Fuel Propellant-5 

JP-8 Jet Fuel Propellant-8 

LCS Laboratory Control Sample 

LCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate 

LOD Limit of Detection 

LOQ Limit of Quantitation 

μg/L micrograms per liter 

MS Matrix Spike 

MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate 

NAVFAC Naval Facilities Engineering Command 

NAVSUP FLC Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center 

N.D. Not Detected 

PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons 

PARCCS Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness, Completeness, Comparability, 

and Sensitivity 

pH hydrogen activity 

QC Quality Control 

RHSF Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

RPD Relative Percent Difference 

SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan 

TEC The Environmental Company, Inc. 

TPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel 

TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline 

U.S. United States of America 

UST Underground Storage Tank 

VOC Volatile Organic Compounds 

WP Work Plan 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report Page x July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report ES-1 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

This quarterly monitoring report presents the results of the second quarter 2013 groundwater 

sampling event conducted on April 24, 2013, at the outside tunnel wells of the Red Hill Bulk Fuel 

Storage Facility [RHSF], Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam [JBPHH], Hawaii. The RHSF is 

located in Halawa Heights on the Island of Oahu. There are 18 active and 2 inactive 

underground storage tanks [USTs] located at the RHSF. The State of Hawaii Department of 

Health [DOH] Facility Identification [ID] number is 9-102271. The DOH Release ID numbers are 

990051, 010011, and 020028. 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil vapor 

monitoring at the RHSF, under Naval Facilities Engineering Command [NAVFAC] Contract 

Number N62742-12-D-1853. The sampling was conducted in accordance with the approved 

Work Plan [WP]/Sampling and Analysis Plan [SAP] prepared by Environmental Science 

International [ESI]. 

On April 24, 2013, ESI personnel collected groundwater samples from two outside tunnel 

monitoring wells (wells HDMW2253-03 and OWDFMW01). A summary of the analytical results 

is provided below. 

 HDMW2253-03 – Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel [TPH-d] (45 micrograms per liter 

[μg/L]), naphthalene (0.16 μg/L), and lead (0.102 μg/L) were detected. None of the 

Contaminants of Potential Concern [COPCs] were detected at concentrations above the 

DOH Environmental Action Levels [EALs] for drinking water toxicity or gross contamination. 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d (1,900 μg/L), acetone (84 μg/L), naphthalene (0.063 μg/L), and 

benzene (0.82 μg/L) were detected. TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH 

EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination. 

Since the wells were last sampled (January 2013), with the exception of TPH-d, groundwater 

contaminant concentrations remained at low concentrations and did not change significantly, or 

were not detected. TPH-d concentrations decreased in well HDMW2253-03 and increased in 

well OWDFMW01 since the last sampling event in January 2013. TPH-d detected in 

HDMW2253-03 decreased to a concentration below the DOH EAL for both drinking water 

toxicity and gross contamination. The TPH-d concentration decreased from 600 μg/L during the 

last round of sampling to 45 μg/L during this round of sampling. TPH-d concentrations in well 

OWDFMW01 increased from 1,000 μg/L during the last round of sampling to 1,900 μg/L. 

Based on the results of the assessment, continued groundwater monitoring at the RHSF is 

recommended. If the TPH-d concentrations significantly increase, the monitoring frequency 

should be increased to monthly, even though the two outside wells are not included in the RHSF 

Groundwater Protection Plan. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report ES-2 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 1-1 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION 

This quarterly monitoring report presents the results of the second quarter 2013 groundwater 

sampling event conducted on April 24, 2013, at the outside tunnel wells of the RHSF, JBPHH, 

Hawaii. The RHSF is located in Halawa Heights on the Island of Oahu. The purpose of the 

sampling is to (1) assess the condition of groundwater beneath and in the vicinity of the RHSF 

with respect to chemical constituents associated with jet fuel propellant and marine diesel fuel, 

and (2) to ensure the Navy remains in compliance with DOH UST release response 

requirements as described in Hawaii Administrative Rules 11-281 Subchapter 7, Release 

Response Action (DOH, 2000). The DOH Facility ID number for the RHSF is 9-102271. The 

DOH Release ID numbers are 990051, 010011, and 020028. 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil vapor 

monitoring at the RHSF, under NAVFAC Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853. The sampling 

was conducted in accordance with the approved WP/SAP prepared by ESI (ESI, 2012). 

1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION

The RHSF is located on federal government land (zoned F1- Military and Federal), located in 

Halawa Heights, approximately 2.5 miles northeast of Pearl Harbor (Figure 1). It is located on a 

low ridge on the western edge of the Koolau Mountain Range that divides Halawa Valley from 

Moanalua Valley. The RHSF is bordered on the north by Halawa Correctional Facility and 

private businesses, on the west by the United States of America [U.S.] Coast Guard reservation, 

on the south by residential neighborhoods, and on the east by Moanalua Valley. A quarry is 

located less than a quarter mile away to the northwest. The RHSF occupies 144 acres of land 

and the majority of the site is at an elevation of approximately 200 to 500 feet above mean sea 

level. 

The RHSF contains 18 active and 2 inactive USTs, which are operated by Naval Supply 

Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center [NAVSUP FLC] Pearl Harbor (formerly Fleet and 

Industrial Supply Center). Each UST has a capacity of approximately 12.5 million gallons. The 

RHSF is located approximately 100 feet above the basal aquifer. The USTs contain Jet Fuel 

Propellant-5 [JP-5], Jet Fuel Propellant-8 [JP-8], and Marine Diesel Fuel [F-76]. The current 

status of each of the USTs is summarized in Table 1.1. 

Two groundwater monitoring wells (well HDMW2253-03 and OWDFMW01) are located outside 

of the RHSF tunnel system (Figure 2). Well HDMW2253-03 is located at the Halawa 

Correctional Facility (outside the RHSF) and well OWDFMW01 is located at the Oily Waste 

Disposal Facility near Adit 3. Five groundwater monitoring wells (wells RHMW01, RHMW02, 

RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01) are located within the RHSF lower access tunnel. 

Monitoring data for the five wells located inside the tunnel are included in a separate report. 

Monitoring wells RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW05 are located inside the 

underground tunnels. Monitoring well RHMW2254-01 is located inside the infiltration gallery of 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 1-2 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

the Department of the Navy [DON] Well 2254-01. DON Well 2254-01 is located approximately 

2,400 feet downgradient of the USTs and provides approximately 24 percent [%] of the potable 

water to the Pearl Harbor System, which serves approximately 52,200 military customers. 

NAVFAC Public Works Department operates the infiltration gallery and DON Well 2254-01. 

TABLE 1.1 

Current Status of the USTs 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

April 2013 Quarterly Monitoring Report 

Tank Identification Fuel Type Status Capacity 

F-1 None Inactive 12.5 million gallons 

F-2 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-3 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-4 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-5 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-6 JP-8 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-7 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-8 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-9 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-10 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-11 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-12 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-13 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-14 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-15 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-16 F-76 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-17 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-18 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-19 None Inactive 12.5 million gallons 

F-20 JP-5 Active 12.5 million gallons 

F-76 Marine Diesel Fuel 

JP-5 Jet Fuel Propellant-5 

JP-8 Jet Fuel Propellant-8

1.2 PHYSICAL SETTINGS

Climatological conditions in the area of the RHSF consist of warm to moderate temperatures 

and low to moderate rainfall. The RHSF is leeward of the prevailing northeasterly trade winds. 

The average annual precipitation is approximately 40 inches, which occurs mainly between 

November and April (State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources [DLNR], 

1986). Annual pan evaporation is approximately 75 inches (DLNR, 1985). Average 

temperatures range from the low 60’s to high 80’s (degrees Fahrenheit) (Atlas of Hawaii, 1983). 

Oahu consists of the eroded remnants of two shield volcanoes, Waianae and Koolau. The 

RHSF is located on the southwest flank of the Koolau volcanic shield. Lavas erupted during the 

shield-building phase of the volcano belong to the Koolau Volcanic Series (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1935). Following formation of the Koolau shield, a long period of volcanic quiescence occurred, 

during which the shield was deeply eroded. Following this erosional period, eruptive activity 

resumed. Lavas and pyroclastic material erupted during this period belong to the Honolulu 

Volcanic Series (Stearns and Vaksvik, 1935). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 1-3 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

In the immediate area of the RHSF, Koolau Volcanic Series lavas dominate, although there are 

consolidated and unconsolidated non-calcareous deposits in the vicinity that consist of alluvium 

generated during erosion of the Koolau volcanic shield. South-southwest of the Site, and in 

isolated exposures to the west, are pyroclastic deposits formed during eruptions from three 

Honolulu Volcanic Series vents, Salt Lake, Aliamanu, and Makalapa (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1935). Based on established geology and records of the drilled wells (Stearns and Vaksvik, 

1938), the RHSF is underlain by Koolau Volcanic Series basalts. The area of the RHSF is 

classified as Rock Land, where 25 to 90% of the land surface is covered by exposed rock and 

there are only shallow soils (Foote, et al., 1972). 

Groundwater in Hawaii exists in two principal types of aquifers. The first and most important 

type, in terms of drinking water resources, is the basal aquifer. The basal aquifer exists as a 

lens of fresh water floating on and displacing seawater within the pore spaces, fractures, and 

voids of the basalt that forms the underlying mass of each Hawaiian island. In parts of Oahu, 

groundwater in the basal aquifer is confined by the overlying caprock and is under pressure. 

Waters that flow freely to the surface from wells that tap the basal aquifer are referred to as 

artesian. 

The second type of aquifer is the caprock aquifer, which consists of various kinds of unconfined 

and semi-confined groundwater. Commonly, the caprock consists of a thick sequence of nearly 

impermeable clays, coral, and basalt, which separates the caprock aquifer from the basal 

aquifer. The impermeable nature of these materials and the artesian nature of the basal aquifer 

severely restrict the downward migration of groundwater from the upper caprock aquifer. In the 

area of the RHSF, there is no discernible caprock. 

Groundwater in the area of the RHSF is part of the Waimalu Aquifer System of the Pearl Harbor 

Aquifer Sector. The aquifer is classified as a basal, unconfined, flank-type; and is currently used 

as a drinking water source. The aquifer is considered fresh with less than 250 milligrams per 

liter of chloride and is considered an irreplaceable resource with a high vulnerability to 

contamination (Mink and Lau, 1990). 

The nearest drinking water supply well is the DON Well 2254-01, located in the infiltration 

gallery within the RHSF. DON Well 2254-01 is located approximately 2,400 feet downgradient of 

the USTs (Figure 2). 

1.3 BACKGROUND

The RHSF was constructed by the U.S. Government in the early 1940s. Twenty USTs and a 

series of tunnels were constructed to supply fuel to the Navy. The USTs were constructed of 

steel and they currently contain JP-5, JP-8, and F-76. Several tanks in the past have stored 

DON special fuel oil, DON distillate, aviation gasoline, and motor gasoline (Environet, 2010). 

The fueling system is a self-contained underground unit that was installed into native rock 

comprised primarily of basalt with some interbedded tuffs and breccias (Environet, 2010). Each 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 1-4 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

UST measures approximately 245 feet in height and 100 feet in diameter. The upper domes of 

the tanks lie at depths varying between 100 feet and 200 feet below ground surface. 

In response to increasing concentrations of COPCs in the groundwater monitoring wells within 

the facility (specifically RHMW02) during the 2008 sampling events, quarterly groundwater 

monitoring was initiated in 2009 at the outside tunnel wells. 

In 2009, groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW04, OWDFMW01, and 

HDMW2253-03. Samples were collected in August and October 2009. None of the COPCs 

were detected at concentrations exceeding the gross contamination or drinking water toxicity 

DOH EALs. 

 

In 2010, groundwater samples were collected from wells RHMW04, OWDFMW01, and 

HDMW2253-03. Samples were collected from well RHMW04 in January and April 2010. 

Samples were collected from well OWDFMW01 in January, April, and October 2010. Samples 

were collected from well HDMW2253-03 in January, April, July and October 2010. The COPCs 

concentrations exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the gross contamination 

and drinking water toxicity DOH EAL in January 2010 (The Environmental Company, Inc. 

[TEC], 2010a). 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the gross contamination and 

drinking water toxicity DOH EALs in January and April 2010 (TEC, 2010a; TEC, 2010b). 

In 2011, groundwater samples were collected from wells OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03. 

Samples were collected in January, April, July, and October 2011. None of the COPCs were 

detected at concentrations exceeding the gross contamination or drinking water toxicity DOH 

EALs. 

In 2012, groundwater samples were collected from wells OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03. 

Samples were collected in January, April, July, and November 2012. TPH-d was detected at a 

concentration above the DOH EALs in samples collected from wells HDMW2253-03 and 

OWDFMW01 (Environet, 2012; ESI, 2013a). The COPCs concentrations exceeding DOH EALs 

are summarized below. 

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EALs for gross 

contamination and drinking water toxicity in April and November 2012. 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EALs for gross 

contamination and drinking water toxicity in April 2012. 

In January 2013, groundwater samples were collected from wells OWDFMW01 and 

HDMW2253-03 (ESI 2013b). TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EALs in 

samples collected from wells HDMW2253-03 and OWDFMW01. The COPCs concentrations 

exceeding DOH EALs are summarized below. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 1-5 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EALs for gross 

contamination and drinking water toxicity in January 2013. 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH EALs for gross 

contamination and drinking water toxicity in January 2013. 

1.3.1 Previous Reports 

The following groundwater monitoring reports were previously submitted to the DOH: 

1. Groundwater Monitoring Report, August 2009 (submitted September 2009). 

2. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2009 (submitted December 2009). 

3. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January, 2010 (submitted April 2010). 

4. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2010 (submitted May 2010). 

5. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2010 (submitted August 2010). 

6. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2010 (submitted December 2010). 

7. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January 2011 (submitted March 2011). 

8. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2011 (submitted June 2011). 

9. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2011 (submitted September 2011). 

10. Groundwater Monitoring Report, October 2011 (submitted December 2011). 

11. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January 2012 (submitted March 2012). 

12. Groundwater Monitoring Report, April 2012 (submitted July 2012). 

13. Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 2012 (submitted August 2012). 

14. Groundwater Monitoring Report, November 2012 (submitted January 2013). 

15. Groundwater Monitoring Report, January 2013 (submitted April 2013). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 1-6 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 2-1 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 2 – GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 

On April 24, 2013, ESI personnel collected groundwater samples from two monitoring wells 

(wells OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03). The samples were collected in accordance with DOH 

UST release response requirements and the RHSF Groundwater Protection Plan (TEC, 2008). 

Prior to purging and sampling, the depth to groundwater and the depth to the bottom of the wells 

were measured. Well OWDFMW01 was measured by ESI using a Geotech oil/water interface 

probe. Well HDMW2253-03 was measured by the DLNR using their Geotech oil/water interface 

probe. The measurements are included in the groundwater sampling logs. No measurable 

product, sheen, or petroleum hydrocarbon odor was observed in either well. 

2.1 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Prior to collecting groundwater samples, disposable bailers were used to purge groundwater 

from the monitoring wells. Wells OWDFMW01 and HDMW2253-03 were purged at a rate of 

0.25 and 0.29 liters per minute, respectively. 

Water quality parameters were monitored on a periodic basis during well purging. The water 

quality parameters that were measured included hydrogen activity [pH], temperature, 

conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and oxidation reduction potential. The water quality parameters 

were evaluated to demonstrate that the natural characteristics of the aquifer formation water 

were present within the monitoring well before collecting the sample. At least four readings were 

collected during the purging process. Purging was considered complete when at least three 

consecutive water quality measurements stabilized within approximately 10%. The readings 

were recorded on groundwater monitoring logs which are included in Appendix A. The field 

notes are included in Appendix B. 

When the water quality parameters stabilized, groundwater samples were collected from the 

wells. The disposable bailers were used to collect the groundwater samples from the monitoring 

wells. For each monitoring well, the groundwater samples were collected no more than two 

hours after purging was completed to prevent groundwater interaction with the monitoring well 

casing and atmosphere. Samples collected for dissolved lead were filtered in the field using a 

peristaltic pump and a 0.45 micron filter. 

2.2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS

The samples were analyzed for TPH-d using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] 

Method 8015M, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline [TPH-g] and Volatile Organic 

Compounds [VOCs] using EPA Method 8260B, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons [PAHs] using 

EPA Method 8270C SIM, and dissolved lead using EPA Method 6020. The analytical results are 

summarized below and in Table 2.1. A copy of the laboratory report is included in Appendix C. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 2-2 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-d (45 μg/L), naphthalene (0.16 μg/L), and lead (0.102 μg/L) were 

detected. None of the COPCs were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs for 

drinking water toxicity or gross contamination. 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d (1,900 μg/L), acetone (84 μg/L), naphthalene (0.063 μg/L), and 

benzene (0.82 μg/L) were detected. TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the DOH 

EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination. 

2.2.1 Groundwater Contaminant Trends 

Historical groundwater contaminant concentration trends of COPCs that exceed the DOH EALs 

are presented in Appendix D. A summary of groundwater contaminant trends are provided 

below. 

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-d detected during this round of quarterly sampling decreased to 

concentrations below the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross 

contamination. TPH-d concentrations last exceeded the DOH EALs for both drinking water 

toxicity and gross contamination in January 2013 (600 μg/L). Naphthalene and lead were 

also detected but remained at low concentrations below DOH EALs, consistent with 

historical results. 

 OWDFMW01 – With the exception of TPH-d, groundwater contaminant concentrations 

remained at low concentrations and did not change significantly, or were not detected. TPH-d 

concentrations detected during this round of sampling were above the DOH EALs for both 

drinking water toxicity and gross contamination, and remained between the concentrations 

detected in November 2012 and January 2013. 

Historical groundwater contaminant concentrations above the DOH EALs for both drinking water 

toxicity and gross contamination are presented in Appendix D. 

2.3 WASTE DISPOSAL

The purged groundwater and decontamination water generated during sampling of the wells 

was stored in a 55-gallon drum along with the purged water and decontamination water from the 

inside tunnel wells. The drum was stored onsite at Adit 3. On June 5, 2013, the drum of water 

was picked up by Pacific Commercial Services, LLC and disposed at Unitek Solvent Services, 

Inc. The waste disposal manifest is included in Appendix E. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

 Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 2-3 

Outside Tunnel Wells 

TABLE 2.1 

Analytical Results for Groundwater Sampling (April 24, 2013) 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

April 2013 Quarterly Monitoring Report 

Method Chemical 

DOH EALs OWDFMW01 (ES025) OWDFMW01 (E

Drinking Water 

Toxicity

Gross 

Contamination Results Q LOQ LOD DL Results Q LO

EPA 8015B TPH-d 190 100 1,900 HD 50 20 15 1,600 HD 50 EPA 8260B TPH-g 100 100 N.D. U 50 30 13 N.D. U 50 EPA 8270C SIM 

Acenaphthene 370 20 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.021 N.D. U 0.2 Acenaphthylene 240 2,000 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.018 N.D. U 0.2 Anthracene 1,800 22 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.035 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.092 4.7 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.024 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1,500 0.13 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.022 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.2 0.81 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.037 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.092 0.75 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.025 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.92 0.4 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.024 N.D. U 0.2 Chrysene 9.2 1 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.019 N.D. U 0.2 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0092 0.52 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.027 N.D. U 0.2 Fluoranthene 1,500 130 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.028 N.D. U 0.2 Fluorene 240 950 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.025 N.D. U 0.2 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.092 0.095 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.022 N.D. U 0.2 1,-Methylnaphthalene 4.7 10 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.029 N.D. U 0.2 2,-Methylnaphthalene 24 10 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.027 N.D. U 0.2 Naphthalene 17 21 0.063 J 0.2 0.051 0.023 0.068 J 0.2 Phenanthrene 240 410 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.031 N.D. U 0.2 Pyrene 180 68 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.025 N.D. U 0.2 

EPA 8260B 

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 970 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.30 N.D. U 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.38 N.D. U 1.0 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.4 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.28 N.D. U 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethylene 7 1,500 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1.0 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.6 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 5.0 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70 3,000 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.5 N.D. U 5.0 1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane 0.04 10 N.D. U 10 2.0 1.2 N.D. U 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.04 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.36 N.D. U 1.0 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 600 10 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 1.0 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.15 7,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1.0 1,2-Dichloropropane 5 10 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.42 N.D. U 5.0 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 180 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.4 N.D. U 1.0 1,3-Dichloropropene (total of cis/trans) 0.43 50,000 N.D. U 2.0 1.0 0.25 N.D. U 2.0 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 75 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1.0 Acetone 22,000 20,000 84 ICH 20 10 6.0 86 ICH 20 Benzene 5 170 0.82 J 1.0 0.5 0.14 0.67 J 1.0 Bromodichloromethane 0.12 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.21 N.D. U 5.0 Bromoform 80 510 N.D. U 10 1.0 0.50 N.D. U 10 Bromomethane 8.7 50,000 N.D. U 20 5.0 3.9 N.D. U 20 Carbon Tetrachloride 5 520 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.23 N.D. U 1.0 Chlorobenzene 100 50 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 5.0 Chloroethane 21,000 16 N.D. U 10 5.0 2.3 N.D. U 10 Chloroform 70 2,400 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 5.0 Chloromethane 1.8 50,000 N.D. IJ, U 10 2.0 1.8 N.D. IJ, U 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 70 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.48 N.D. U 1.0 Dibromochloromethane 0.16 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.25 N.D. U 1.0 Ethylbenzene 700 30 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.14 N.D. U 1.0 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.86 6 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.32 N.D. U 1.0 Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone) 7,100 8,400 N.D. U 10 5.0 2.2 N.D. U 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone (4-Methyl-2-Pentanone) 2,000 1300 N.D. U 10 5.0 4.4 N.D. U 10 Methyl tert-butyl Ether 12 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.31 N.D. U 1.0 Methylene chloride 4.8 9,100 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 5.0 Styrene 100 10 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 1.0 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- 0.52 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.40 N.D. U 1.0 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 0.067 500 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.41 N.D. U 1.0 Tetrachloroethylene 5 170 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.39 N.D. U 5.0 Toluene 1,000 40 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1.0 trans-1,2- Dichloroethylene 100 260 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1.0 Trichloroethylene 5 310 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1.0 Vinyl chloride 2 3,400 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.30 N.D. U 1.0 Xylenes 10,000 20 N.D. U 11 1.5 0.23 N.D. U 11 

EPA 6020 Dissolved Lead 15 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.2 0.0898 N.D. U 1 

The data are in micrograms per liter (μg/L). Shaded values exceeded the DOH EALs. DOH EALs DOH Tier 1 Environmental Action Levels for groundwater where groundwater is a current drinking water source and surface water is greater than 150 meters from the site (DOH, Fall 2011). LOD Limit of Detection 

DL Detection Limit or Method Detection Limit (MDL) LOQ Limit of Quantitation EPA Environmental Protection Agency N.D. Not Detected HD The chromatographic pattern was inconsistent with the profile of the reference fuel standard. Q Qualifiers ICH Initial calibration verification recovery above method control limit for this analyte. TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline IJ Calibration verification recovery above method control limit for this analyte. TPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel 

J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the LOQ and above the DL. Reported value is estimated. U Undetected at DL and is reported as less than th
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

 Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 2-4 

Outside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 3-1 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 3 – DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT 

A data quality assessment, which consists of a review of the overall groundwater sample 

collection and analysis process, was performed in order to determine whether the analytical 

data generated meet the quality objectives for the project. The field Quality Control [QC] 

program consisted of standardized sample collection and management procedures, and the 

collection of field duplicate samples, matrix spike samples, and trip blank samples. The 

laboratory quality assurance program consisted of the use of standard analytical methods and 

the preparation and analyses of Matrix Spike [MS]/Matrix Spike Duplicate [MSD] samples, 

surrogate spikes, blanks, Laboratory Control Samples [LCS] and Laboratory Control Sample 

Duplicate [LCSD]. 

3.1 Data Validation and Assessment 

The objective of data validation is to provide data of known quality for project decisions. Data 

quality is judged in terms of Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness, Completeness, 

Comparability, and Sensitivity [PARCCS]. A number of factors may affect the quality of data, 

including: sample collection methods, sample analysis methods, and adherence to established 

procedures for sample collection, preservation, management, shipment, and analysis. 

Precision 

Precision is defined as the reproducibility of replicate measurements. Precision is evaluated by 

Relative Percentage Difference [RPD] of field duplicates and laboratory LCS/LCSD or MS/MSD 

results. Field duplicate and MS/MSD samples were collected at a rate of approximately 10% of 

project samples. Field duplicates were sent to the laboratory along with the primary samples. 

For this monitoring event, the RPDs for MS/MSD and LCS/LCSD pairs were all within the 

acceptable range except for 1,1-dichloroethylene (22%) and acetone (31%). As neither analyte 

was detected at a concentration within an order of magnitude of the EAL, this is unlikely to affect 

data usability. The RPDs of detected analytes for the primary and field duplicate samples 

(ES025 and ES026) are provided in Table 3.1. A precision of less than 50% for duplicate pairs 

is required by the DoN Project Procedures Manual to be considered acceptable (DoN 2007). 

The benzene and naphthalene concentrations detected in the samples were below the 

respective limits of quantitation [LOQs] implying a higher uncertainty for these results than for 

values detected above the LOQs (i.e. estimated, J-flagged). Consequently, the assigned RPDs 

signified the anticipated decrease in precision below the LOQs but were not indicative of a QC 

issue. Therefore the data precision is considered acceptable. 

Accuracy 

Accuracy is defined as the degree of conformity of a measurement to a standard or true value. 

Accuracy is evaluated through measurement of the percent recovery of an analyte in a 

reference standard or spiked sample. Accuracy limits for surrogates, laboratory control spike, 

MS, and MSD samples are established by the individual laboratory. The acceptance criteria for 

accuracy are dependent on the analytical method and are based on historical laboratory data. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 3-2 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

Results for TPH-d in samples ES025 and ES026 were flagged “HD.” The laboratory indicated a 

mismatch between the calibration standard and the TPH-d chromatographic profile. Mismatches 

of this type are not uncommon. The chromatograms are not part of the standard laboratory 

package and were not reviewed by ESI. 

All of the LCS and surrogate spike recoveries for analyzed constituents were within acceptable 

percent recovery limits. The MS and/or MSD recoveries were below the control limits for 1,1,2,2-

tetrachloroethane and 1,1-dichloroethylene, and the associated sample results may be biased 

low. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane and 1,1-dichloroethylene were not detected in any of the 

groundwater samples. However the drinking water EAL for each contaminant is below the 

respective LODs. Because no HVOCs were detected in any sample, it is not likely that 1,1,2,2-

tetrachloroethane or 1,1-dichloroethylene are present at concentrations above the EALs. 

The MS and/or MSD recoveries were above the control limits for TPH-d, fluorene, 

phenanthrene, acetone, and trichloroethene. TPH-d was the only one of these contaminants 

detected at concentrations above the EAL. The LCS recovery for TPH-d was within control 

limits, so the high MS recoveries are likely due to matrix interference. The TPH-d concentrations 

detected in samples ES025 and ES026 exceeded the EALs by an order of magnitude, so it is 

unlikely that a slight high bias would be significant. 

All other MS/MSD recoveries were within acceptable recovery limits; therefore, the data 

accuracy for this monitoring event is considered acceptable. 

 

Representativeness 

Representativeness is the degree that data accurately and precisely represents a characteristic 

of a population, parameter variations at a sampling point, or an environmental condition. 

Representativeness was achieved by conducting sampling in compliance with the sample 

collection procedures described in the WP/SAP specifically written for this project (ESI, 2012). 

Representativeness is also evaluated through the compliance with the sample holding time, 

sample preservation, and the analysis of blank samples, including method blank and trip blank 

samples. The sample holding time and sample preservation complied with the EPA criteria. For 

this sampling event, one trip blank was included in the cooler to assess contamination during 

sample transport for TPH-g and VOCs. There was no detection of TPH-g or VOCs in the 

method blank. Therefore, the groundwater sample data are considered representative of the 

groundwater quality on site. 

Completeness 

Completeness is defined as the overall percentage of valid analytical results (including 

estimated results) compared to the total number of analytical results reported by the laboratory. 

No data were rejected for this project, and therefore the completeness goal for this project 

(90%) was successfully met. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 3-3 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

Comparability 

Comparability expresses the confidence with which one data set can be compared to another 

data set. Comparability can be related to accuracy and precision because these quantities are 

measures of data reliability. Data, with acceptable precision and accuracy, are considered 

comparable if collection techniques, analytical procedures, methods and reporting are 

equivalent. For this monitoring event, the samples were collected using approaches consistent 

with those in the previous events, and the same analytical methods/procedures were used to 

measure the concentration of COPCs. Therefore, the results are considered comparable within 

this data set and with the data collected from previous sampling events. The field and laboratory 

personnel followed standard operation procedures. 

All TPH-g data through July 2010 was analyzed by EPA Method 8015; beginning in October 

2010, EPA Method 8260B was used. There was no event where both methods were used, and 

so there is no way to directly compare the results using each method and determine if one 

method produces biased results. However, there is no reason to believe that using either 

method should bias the data, and the TPH-g data for all events should be comparable. 

Between August 2009 and July 2010, naphthalene was analyzed for by both EPA Methods 

8260B and 8270C, and both results were reported. Beginning in October 2010, only results 

using EPA Method 8270C were reported. Naphthalene was not detected in any well until 

November 2012, so comparability with older results should not be a concern. However, the low 

bias associated with EPA Method 8270C must be considered when making project decisions. 

Sensitivity 

The LOQs are established by the laboratory based on the LODs or instrument detection limits, 

historical data, and EPA limits established for the methods. The LOQs for samples may require 

adjustment due to matrix interference or if high levels of target analytes necessitate dilution 

before analysis. Matrix interference and sample dilutions have the effect of increasing the 

LOQs. Laboratory LODs and LOQs for several analytes differed from the LODs and LOQs in the 

WP/SAP because the laboratory updates them quarterly. LODs and LOQs for several analytes 

were greater than the DOH EALs (as stated in the WP/SAP) and therefore it is not possible to 

determine whether the analytes are present at concentrations greater than or equal to the DOH 

EALs. As suggested by the DOH Technical Guidance Manual, the project action level will be the 

LOQ for these analytes. 

3.2 Data Assessment and Usability Conclusions 

The PARCCS criteria were evaluated, and with a few exceptions, all criteria were met. These 

exceptions include the exceedances of recovery criteria for MS/MSDs for several VOCs and 

PAHs. Since the surrogate recoveries and the recoveries of the VOCs and PAHs in the 

LCS/LCSD are all within recovery criteria, the MS/MSD exceendaces are not considered to 

affect the usability of the data, but may indicate some matrix heterogeneity. TPH-d 

concentrations exceeded DOH EALs in well OWDFMW01, and may be biased slightly high; 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 3-4 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

however, since the data are consistent with data from previous events, it appears that the effect 

of this QC exceedance is not substantial, and the data is usable. The data assessment 

concludes that all data generated during this event are usable for their intended purpose. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 3-5 Outside Tunnel Wells 

TABLE 3.1 

Quality Control Results for Groundwater Sampling (April 24, 2013) 

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 

April 2013 Quarterly Monitoring Report

Method Chemical Constituent 

DOH EALs OWDFMW01 (ES025) OWDFMW01 (ES026

Drinking Water 

Toxicity

Gross 

Contamination Results Q LOQ LOD DL Results Q LOQ 

EPA 8015B TPH-d 190 100 1,900 HD 50 20 15 1,600 HD 50 EPA 8260B TPH-g 100 100 N.D. U 50 30 13 N.D. U 50 EPA 8270C SIM 

Acenaphthene 370 20 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.021 N.D. U 0.2 Acenaphthylene 240 2,000 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.018 N.D. U 0.2 Anthracene 1,800 22 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.035 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.092 4.7 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.024 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1,500 0.13 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.022 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.2 0.81 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.037 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.092 0.75 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.025 N.D. U 0.2 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.92 0.4 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.024 N.D. U 0.2 Chrysene 9.2 1 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.019 N.D. U 0.2 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 0.0092 0.52 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.027 N.D. U 0.2 Fluoranthene 1,500 130 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.028 N.D. U 0.2 Fluorene 240 950 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.025 N.D. U 0.2 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.092 0.095 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.022 N.D. U 0.2 1,-Methylnaphthalene 4.7 10 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.029 N.D. U 0.2 2,-Methylnaphthalene 24 10 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.027 N.D. U 0.2 Naphthalene 17 21 0.063 J 0.2 0.051 0.023 0.068 J 0.2 Phenanthrene 240 410 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.031 N.D. U 0.2 Pyrene 180 68 N.D. U 0.2 0.051 0.025 N.D. U 0.2 

EPA 8260B 

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 970 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.30 N.D. U 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.38 N.D. U 1.0 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.4 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.28 N.D. U 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethylene 7 1,500 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1.0 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.6 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 5.0 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70 3,000 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.5 N.D. U 5.0 1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane 0.04 10 N.D. U 10 2.0 1.2 N.D. U 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.04 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.36 N.D. U 1.0 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 600 10 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 1.0 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.15 7,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1.0 1,2-Dichloropropane 5 10 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.42 N.D. U 5.0 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 180 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.4 N.D. U 1.0 1,3-Dichloropropene (total of cis/trans) 0.43 50,000 N.D. U 2.0 1.0 0.25 N.D. U 2.0 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 75 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.43 N.D. U 1.0 Acetone 22,000 20,000 84 ICH 20 10 6.0 86 ICH 20 Benzene 5 170 0.82 J 1.0 0.5 0.14 0.67 J 1.0 Bromodichloromethane 0.12 50,000 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.21 N.D. U 5.0 Bromoform 80 510 N.D. U 10 1.0 0.50 N.D. U 10 Bromomethane 8.7 50,000 N.D. U 20 5.0 3.9 N.D. U 20 Carbon Tetrachloride 5 520 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.23 N.D. U 1.0 Chlorobenzene 100 50 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 5.0 Chloroethane 21,000 16 N.D. U 10 5.0 2.3 N.D. U 10 Chloroform 70 2,400 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.46 N.D. U 5.0 Chloromethane 1.8 50,000 N.D. IJ, U 10 2.0 1.8 N.D. IJ, U 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 70 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.48 N.D. U 1.0 Dibromochloromethane 0.16 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.25 N.D. U 1.0 Ethylbenzene 700 30 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.14 N.D. U 1.0 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.86 6 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.32 N.D. U 1.0 Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone) 7,100 8,400 N.D. U 10 5.0 2.2 N.D. U 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone (4-Methyl-2-Pentanone) 2,000 1300 N.D. U 10 5.0 4.4 N.D. U 10 Methyl tert-butyl Ether 12 5 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.31 N.D. U 1.0 Methylene chloride 4.8 9,100 N.D. U 5.0 1.0 0.64 N.D. U 5.0 Styrene 100 10 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.17 N.D. U 1.0 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- 0.52 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.40 N.D. U 1.0 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 0.067 500 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.41 N.D. U 1.0 Tetrachloroethylene 5 170 N.D. U 5.0 0.5 0.39 N.D. U 5.0 Toluene 1,000 40 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.24 N.D. U 1.0 trans-1,2- Dichloroethylene 100 260 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1.0 Trichloroethylene 5 310 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.37 N.D. U 1.0 Vinyl chloride 2 3,400 N.D. U 1.0 0.5 0.30 N.D. U 1.0 Xylenes 10,000 20 N.D. U 11 1.5 0.23 N.D. U 11 

EPA 6020 Dissolved Lead 15 50,000 N.D. U 1.0 0.2 0.0898 N.D. U 1 

The data are in micrograms per liter (μg/L). Shaded values exceeded the DOH EALs. DOH EALs DOH Tier 1 Environmental Action Levels for groundwater where groundwater is a current drinking water source and surface water is greater than 150 meters from the site (DOH, Fall 2011). LOQ Limit of Quantitation 

DL Detection Limit or Method Detection Limit (MDL) NA Both results for duplicate pair were non-detect, no REPA Environmental Protection Agency N.D. Not Detected ICH Initial calibration verification recovery above method control limit for this analyte. Q Qualifiers IJ Calibration verification recovery above method control limit for this analyte. TPH-g Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the LOQ and above the DL. Reported value is estimated. TPH-d Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel LOD Limit of Detection U Undetected at DL and is reported as less than the L
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 3-6 Outside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 4-1 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 4 – SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

This quarterly monitoring report presents the results of groundwater sampling conducted on 

April 24, 2013, at the RHSF, JBPHH, Hawaii. The RHSF is located in Halawa Heights on the 

Island of Oahu. The DOH Facility ID number for the RHSF is 9-102271. The DOH Release ID 

numbers are 990051, 010011, and 020028. 

The groundwater sampling was conducted as part of the long-term groundwater and soil 

vapor monitoring at the RHSF, under NAVFAC Contract Number N62742-12-D-1853. The 

sampling was conducted in accordance with the approved WP/SAP prepared by ESI. 

On April 24, 2013, ESI personnel collected groundwater samples from two monitoring wells 

(wells HDMW2253-03 and OWDFMW01). A summary of the analytical results is provided 

below. 

 HDMW2253-03 – TPH-d (45 μg/L), naphthalene (0.16 μg/L), and lead (0.102 μg/L) were 

detected. None of the COPCs were detected at concentrations above the DOH EALs for 

drinking water toxicity or gross contamination. 

 OWDFMW01 – TPH-d (1,900 μg/L), acetone (84 μg/L), naphthalene (0.063 μg/L), and 

benzene (0.82 μg/L) were detected. TPH-d was detected at a concentration above the 

DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination. 

Groundwater Contaminant Trends 

Historical groundwater contaminant concentration trends of COPCs that exceed the DOH 

EALs are presented in Appendix D. A summary of groundwater contaminant trends are 

provided below. 

 HDMW2253-03 – Both TPH-d and naphthalene were detected. Naphthalene was last 

detected in July 2010. TPH-d concentrations detected during this round of quarterly 

sampling decreased to concentrations below the DOH EALs for both drinking water toxicity 

and gross contamination. TPH-d concentrations last exceeded the DOH EALs for both 

drinking water toxicity and gross contamination in January 2013 (600 μg/L). 

 OWDFMW01 – With the exception of TPH-d, groundwater contaminant concentrations 

remained at low concentrations and did not change significantly, or were not detected. 

TPH-d concentrations detected during this round of sampling remained above the DOH 

EALs for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination, and increased from the 

previous sampling event in January 2013 (1,000 μg/L). 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 4-2 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

Conclusions and Recommendations 

Since the wells were last sampled (January 2013), with the exception of TPH-d, groundwater 

contaminant concentrations remained at low concentrations and did not change significantly, 

or were not detected. TPH-d concentrations decreased in well HDMW2253-03 and increased 

in well OWDFMW01. TPH-d detected in HDMW2253-03 decreased to a concentration below 

the DOH EAL for both drinking water toxicity and gross contamination. The TPH-d 

concentration decreased from 600 μg/L during the last round of sampling to 45 μg/L during 

this round of sampling. TPH-d concentrations in well OWDFMW01 increased from 1,000 μg/L 

during the last round of sampling to 1,900 μg/L. 

Based on the results of the assessment, continued groundwater monitoring at the RHSF is 

recommended. If the TPH-d concentrations significantly increase, the monitoring frequency 

should be increased to monthly, even though the two outside wells are not included in the 

RHSF Groundwater Protection Plan. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 5-1 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 5 – FUTURE WORK 

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING

Future work includes the third quarter 2013 groundwater monitoring which is scheduled for July 

2013. It is anticipated that the quarterly groundwater monitoring status report will be submitted 

in August 2013. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 5-2 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 6-1 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

SECTION 6 – REFERENCES 

Atlas of Hawaii, 1983, Department of Geography, University of Hawaii Press. 

DLNR, 1985, Pan Evaporation: State of Hawai’i 1894-1983: Report R74, Division of Water and 

Land Development, August 1995. 

DLNR, 1986, Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii: Report R76, Division of Water and Land Development, 

June 1986. 

DOH, 2000, Hawaii Department of Health, Technical Guidance Manual for Underground 

Storage Tank Closure and Release Response, March 2000. 

DOH, 2011, Screening for Environmental Hazards at Sites with Contaminated Soil and 

Groundwater, Hawai'i Department of Health, Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response, 

December 2011. 

DON, 2007, Project Procedures Manual, U.S. Navy Installation Restoration Program, NAVFAC 

Pacific, Prepared for Pacific Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC Pacific), 

February 2007. 

Environet, 2010, Work Plan, Long-Term Monitoring, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl 

Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, September 2010. 

Environet, 2012, Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report-Outside (Non-Tunnel Wells), Red 

Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, July 2012. 

ESI, 2012, Work Plan/Sampling and Analysis Plan, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl 

Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, October 2012. 

ESI, 2013a, Fourth Quarter 2012 - Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Outside Tunnel 

Wells, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, January 2013. 

ESI, 2013b, First Quarter 2013 - Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Outside Tunnel 

Wells, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii, April 2013. 

Foote et al., 1972, Soil Survey of the Islands of Kauai, Oahu, Maui, Molokai, and Lanai, State of 

Hawaii. 

Mink, J. F. and Lau, L. S., 1990, Aquifer Identification and Classification for Oahu: Groundwater 

Protection Strategy for Hawaii: Water Resources Research Center Technical Report No. 179, 

February 1990. 
Contract No. N62742-12-D-1853 Contract Task Order 0002 

Red Hill LTM, 2Q2013 Status Report 6-2 July 2013

Outside Tunnel Wells 

Stearns, H. T. and Vaksvik, K. N., 1935, Geology and Groundwater Resources of the Island of 

Oahu, Hawaii: Hawaii Div. Hydrogr. Bull. 

Stearns, H. T. and Vaksvik, K. N., 1938, Records of the Drilled Wells on the Island of Oahu, 

Hawaii: Hawaii Div. Hydrogr. Bull. 4, 213 p. 

TEC, 2008, Final Groundwater Protection Plan, Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Prepared for 

Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, January 2008. 

TEC, 2010a, Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells, Prepared 

for Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, April 2010. 

TEC, 2010b, Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report – Outside (Non-Tunnel) Wells, Prepared 

for Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, May 2010. 
FIGURES 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
KAENA POINT KAHUKU MAKAHA MAILI NANAKULI WAIANAE BARBERS POINT EWA BEACH HONOLULU INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WAIKIKI DIAMOND HICKAM AFB KAPOLEI EWA MOKULEIA HALEIWA WAIMEA POINT LAIE PUNALUU KAAAWA WAIAHOLE KANEOHE BAY KANEOHE MOKAPU KAILUA WAIMANALO MAKAPUU POINT HAWAII KAHALA KAI HONOLULU WAHIAWA SCHOFIELD BARRACKS PEARL CITY 83 930 803 99 80 780 83 61 63 78 72 61 83 836 76 63 780 93 930 750 99 H3 H1 H1 H1 H2 (RESIDENTIAL HOUSING) 

LAWA 

ONAL 

ILITY NAVY FIRING RANGE RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY 

GRAPHIC SCALE 900 0 900 Scale in Feet The accuracy of this document is limited to the quality and scale of the source information. This document is not a legal representation of an engineered survey. NOTES SOURCES Pearl Harbor Base Map Navy GIS files PROJECT LOCATION FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION GROUNDWATER MONITORING RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEM COMMAND (NAVSUP) FLEET LOGISTICS CENTER JBPHH, OAHU, HAWAII
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
RHMW05 RHMW04 HDMW2253-03 SVMP04 SVMP06 SVMP12 SVMP14 SVMP16 SVMP18 SVMP20 SVMP17 SVMP15 SVMP11 SVMP09 SVMP07 SVMP05 SVMP03 RHMW03 (RESIDENTIAL HOUSING) RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY SVMP13 SVMP08 HALAWA 

CTIONAL 

ACILITY NAVY FIRING RANGE 

RHMW01 SVMP02 RHMW02 SVMP10 

GRAPHIC SCALE 1,200 0 1,200 Scale in Feet The accuracy of this document is limited to the quality and scale of the source information. This document is not a legal representation of an engineered survey. NOTES RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY HALAWA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY HALAWA STREAM BUILDING ROAD ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANK WATER TANK SOIL VAPOR MONITORING POINT GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATED INSIDE TUNNEL GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATED OUTSIDE TUNNEL BOARD OF WATER SUPPLY PUMP STATION LEGEND SOURCES Pearl Harbor Base Map Navy GIS files FIGURE 2 SITE LAYOUT GROUNDWATER MONITORING RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEM COMMAND (NAVSUP) FLEET LOGISTICS CENTER JBPHH, OAHU, HAWAII
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
APPENDIX A 

Groundwater Sampling Logs 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

120.15 ft Date: 4/24/2013 730

OWDFMW01

145.10 ft

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l)

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

Cloudy, Light Showers

Disposable Hand Bailer

Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87

9.99

10.01

10.10

10.15

120.15 ft 0.29 L/min

5.0 L

-

735

737

9.82

9.90

3.120

3.167

740

744

750

752

0.0 L

1.0 L

2.0 L

3.0 L

4.0 L

5.0 L

3.026

3.045

3.052

3.19

2.84

1.80

1.75

1.75

3.021

1.76

23.37

23.32

23.32

23.25

23.00 1.70

1.71

1.63

1.64

1.73

23.40 1.73

-288.9

-289.5

-289.2

-289.9

-279.2

-282.9

TPH-d - 8015; TPH-g, VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270c sim;

lead - 6020

ES025 [0800], ES025 MS/MSD [0800]; ES026 [0900]

Clear

Low

None

16 - 40ml VOAs, 6 - 1L amber jar, 4 - 500ml amber jar, 4 - 500ml HDPE

4/24/2013 1200

Disposable Hand Bailer

Triple Rinsed

None

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

None

Appendix A Outside
Groundwater Sampling Log

Well ID: Location: Project No.:

Initial Water Level: Time:

Total Depth of Well: Personnel Involved:

Length of Saturated Zone: Weather Conditions:

Volume of Water to be Removed: Method of Removal:

Water Level After Purging: Pumping Rate:

Well Purge Data:

Sample Withdrawal Method:

Appearance of Sample:

Color:

Turbidity:

Sediment:

Other:

Laboratory Analysis Parameters and Preservatives:

Number and Types of Sample Containers:

Sample Identification Numbers:

Decontamination Procedures:

Notes:

Sampled by:

Sampled Delivered to: Transporters:

Date: Time:

Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility 112066

208.03 ft Date: 4/24/2013 915

HDMW2253-03

1575 ft Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

- Sunny

- Disposable Hand Bailer

- 0.25 L/min

Time

Volume 

Removed pH

Conductivity 

(mS/cm) DO (mg/l) Temperature Salinity

Redox (ORP) 

(mV)

927 0.0 L 7.36 0.582 3.14 22.53 0.30 -130.5

931 1.0 L 7.20 0.487 2.50 22.45 0.25 -244.5

935 2.0 L 7.19 0.484 2.80 22.44 0.25 -168.5

939 3.0 L 7.17 0.474 2.67 22.38 0.24 -266.1

943 4.0 L 7.17 0.469 2.71 22.34 0.24 -259.3

Clear

Low

None

None

TPH-d - 8015; TPH-g, VOCs - 8260; PAHs - 8270c sim;

Disposable Hand Bailer

lead - 6020

ES027 [0930]

Triple Rinsed

None

Justin Lam, Branden Ibara

6 - 40ml VOAs, 2 - 1L amber jar, 1 - 500ml amber jar, 1 - 250ml HDPE

Calscience Environmental Lab FedEx

4/24/2013 1200

Capacity of Casing (Gallons/Linear Feet)

2"-0.16• 4"-0.65 • 8"-2.61 • 10"-4.08 • 12"-5.87

Appendix A Outside
APPENDIX B 

Field Notes 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
APPENDIX C 

Laboratory Reports 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Analytical Report For

Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

Client Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066

Attention: Robert Chong

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

WORK ORDER NUMBER: 13-04-1894

Richard Villafania

Project Manager

05/2/2013

Page 1 of 36
Contents

Client Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066

Work Order Number: 13-04-1894

1 Work Order Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

2 Client Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

2.1 EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals (Aqueous) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

2.2 EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel (Aqueous) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

2.3 EPA 8270C SIM PAHs (Aqueous) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

2.4 GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics (Aqueous) . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

3 Quality Control Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

3.1 MS/MSD and/or Duplicate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

3.2 LCS/LCSD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

4 Sample Analysis Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

5 Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

6 Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

Page 2 of 36
Work Order Narrative

Condition Upon Receipt:

Samples were received under Chain of Custody (COC) on 04/26/2013. They were assigned to

Work Order 13-04-1894.

Unless otherwise noted on the Sample Receiving forms all samples were received in good

condition and within the recommended EPA temperature criteria for the methods noted on the

COC. The COC and Sample Receiving Documents are integral elements of the analytical

report and are presented at the back of the report.

Holding Times:

All samples were analyzed within prescribed holding times (HT) and/or in accordance with the

Calscience Sample Acceptance Policy unless otherwise noted in the analytical report and/or

comprehensive case narrative, if required.

Any parameter identified in 40CFR Part 136.3 Table II that is designated as "analyze

immediately" with an immediate holding time (HT </= 15 minutes --40CFR-136.3 Table II

footnote 4), is considered a "field" test and reported samples results are not flagged unless the

analysis is performed beyond 24 hours of the time of collection.

Quality Control:

All quality control parameters (QC) were within established control limits except where noted in

the QC summary forms or described further within this report.

Additional Comments:

Solid - Unless otherwise indicated, solid sample data is reported on a wet weight basis, not

corrected for % moisture. All QC results are always reported on a wet weight basis.

Subcontract Information:

Unless otherwise noted below (or on the subcontract form), no samples were subcontracted.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

NELAP ID: 03220CA . DoD-ELAP ID: L10-41 . CSDLAC ID: 10109 . SCAQMD ID: 93LA0830

Return to Contents

Page 3 of 36
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: 13-04-1894 Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/26/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES 025 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/24/13 08:00

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1894-2

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 21:47 130429L05D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES 026 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/24/13 09:00

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1894-3

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 21:50 130429L05D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: ES 027 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/24/13 09:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1894-4

Lead 0.102 J 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 21:53 130429L05D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

EPA 6020 ICP/MS Metals Extraction: EPA 3020A Total

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/30/13 17:05

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-14-497-27

Lead <0.200 U 0.0898 0.200 1.00 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 21:17 130429L05D

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 4 of 36
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: 13-04-1894 Client: Environmental Science International, Inc.

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/26/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 025 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/24/13 08:00

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1894-2

TPH as Diesel 1900 HD 15 20 50 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 12:42 130429B08

Surr: n-Octacosane (51-141%) 134% 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 12:42 130429B08

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

-TPH as Diesel is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 026 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/24/13 09:00

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1894-3

TPH as Diesel 1600 HD 15 20 50 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 12:58 130429B08

Surr: n-Octacosane (51-141%) 130% 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 12:58 130429B08

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

-TPH as Diesel is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 027 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 04/24/13 09:30

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1894-4

TPH as Diesel 45 J 15 20 50 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 14:20 130429B08

Surr: n-Octacosane (51-141%) 140% 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 14:20 130429B08

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

-TPH as Diesel is quantified in the carbon range C10-C28.

EPA 8015B (M) TPH Diesel Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled: 05/01/13 17:52

Analyte

Dilution

Factor Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-15-516-41

TPH as Diesel <20 U 15 20 50 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 11:21 130429B08

Surr: n-Octacosane (51-141%) 131% 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 11:21 130429B08

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 5 of 36
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1894

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/26/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 025 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/24/13 08:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1894-2

Naphthalene 0.063 J 0.023 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.051 U 0.027 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.051 U 0.029 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Acenaphthylene <0.051 U 0.018 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Acenaphthene <0.051 U 0.021 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Fluorene <0.051 U 0.025 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Phenanthrene <0.051 U 0.031 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Anthracene <0.051 U 0.035 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Fluoranthene <0.051 U 0.028 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Pyrene <0.051 U 0.025 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.051 U 0.024 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Chrysene <0.051 U 0.019 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.051 U 0.024 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.051 U 0.025 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.051 U 0.037 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.051 U 0.022 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.051 U 0.027 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.051 U 0.022 0.051 0.20 1.02 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 94% 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 95% 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 100% 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:20 130429L19

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 6 of 36
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1894

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/26/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 026 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/24/13 09:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1894-3

Naphthalene 0.068 J 0.023 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.029 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Acenaphthylene <0.050 U 0.018 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Acenaphthene <0.050 U 0.021 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Fluorene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Phenanthrene <0.050 U 0.031 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Anthracene <0.050 U 0.034 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Pyrene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Chrysene <0.050 U 0.019 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.037 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1.01 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 98% 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 101% 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 108% 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 17:47 130429L19

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 7 of 36
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1894

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/26/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: ES 027 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/24/13 09:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1894-4

Naphthalene 0.16 J 0.024 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.052 U 0.027 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.052 U 0.029 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Acenaphthylene <0.052 U 0.019 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Acenaphthene <0.052 U 0.021 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Fluorene <0.052 U 0.025 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Phenanthrene <0.052 U 0.032 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Anthracene <0.052 U 0.035 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Fluoranthene <0.052 U 0.028 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Pyrene <0.052 U 0.026 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.052 U 0.025 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Chrysene <0.052 U 0.020 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.052 U 0.024 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.052 U 0.026 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.052 U 0.038 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.052 U 0.023 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.052 U 0.028 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.052 U 0.023 0.052 0.21 1.035 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 100% 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 104% 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 115% 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 18:14 130429L19

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 8 of 36
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 099-15-148

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/26/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

EPA 8270C SIM PAHs Extraction: EPA 3510C

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/30/13 17:15

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-15-148-13

Naphthalene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.026 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.050 U 0.028 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Acenaphthylene <0.050 U 0.018 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Acenaphthene <0.050 U 0.021 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Fluorene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Phenanthrene <0.050 U 0.031 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Anthracene <0.050 U 0.034 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Pyrene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Benzo (a) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.024 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Chrysene <0.050 U 0.019 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.023 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene <0.050 U 0.025 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Benzo (a) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.036 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene <0.050 U 0.027 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene <0.050 U 0.022 0.050 0.20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 (28-139%) 96% 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl (33-144%) 103% 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14 (23-160%) 104% 04/29/13 00:00 04/30/13 16:27 130429L19

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 9 of 36
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1894

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/26/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES Trip Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/24/13 07:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1894-1

Acetone <10 ICH,U 6.0 10 20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Bromomethane <5.0 U 3.9 5.0 20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Chloromethane <2.0 IJ,U 1.8 2.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 U 1.2 2.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Ethylbenzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Toluene <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 10 of 36
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1894

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/26/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES Trip Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/24/13 07:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1894-1

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.30 1.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

o-Xylene <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Gasoline Range Organics <30 U 13 30 50 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 97% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 97% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 98% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 97% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 100% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:46 130429L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 11 of 36
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1894

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/26/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 025 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/24/13 08:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1894-2

Acetone 84 ICH 6.0 10 20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Benzene 0.82 J 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Bromomethane <5.0 U 3.9 5.0 20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Chloromethane <2.0 IJ,U 1.8 2.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 U 1.2 2.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Ethylbenzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Toluene <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 12 of 36
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1894

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/26/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 025 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/24/13 08:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1894-2

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.30 1.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

o-Xylene <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Gasoline Range Organics <30 U 13 30 50 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 95% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 95% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 100% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 99% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 99% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 15:13 130429L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 13 of 36
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1894

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/26/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 026 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/24/13 09:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1894-3

Acetone 86 ICH 6.0 10 20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Benzene 0.67 J 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Bromomethane <5.0 U 3.9 5.0 20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Chloromethane <2.0 IJ,U 1.8 2.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 U 1.2 2.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Ethylbenzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Toluene <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 14 of 36
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1894

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/26/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 026 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/24/13 09:00

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1894-3

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.30 1.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

o-Xylene <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Gasoline Range Organics <30 U 13 30 50 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 93% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 97% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 99% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 98% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 99% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 16:59 130429L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 15 of 36
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1894

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/26/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 027 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/24/13 09:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1894-4

Acetone <10 ICH,U 6.0 10 20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Bromomethane <5.0 U 3.9 5.0 20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Chloromethane <2.0 IJ,U 1.8 2.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 U 1.2 2.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Ethylbenzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Toluene <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 16 of 36
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 13-04-1894

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/26/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: ES 027 Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/24/13 09:30

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

13-04-1894-4

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.30 1.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

o-Xylene <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Gasoline Range Organics <30 U 13 30 50 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 98% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 97% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 101% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 100% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 100% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 17:26 130429L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 17 of 36
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 099-13-057

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/26/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/30/13 10:13

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-13-057-25

Acetone <10 U 6.0 10 20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Benzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Bromodichloromethane <0.50 U 0.21 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Bromoform <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Bromomethane <5.0 U 3.9 5.0 20 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

2-Butanone <5.0 U 2.2 5.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Carbon Tetrachloride <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Chlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Chloroethane <5.0 U 2.3 5.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Chloroform <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Chloromethane <2.0 U 1.8 2.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Dibromochloromethane <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <2.0 U 1.2 2.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

1,2-Dibromoethane <0.50 U 0.36 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.46 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.28 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.43 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

c-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.48 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

t-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 U 0.42 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

c-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

t-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 U 0.25 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Ethylbenzene <0.50 U 0.14 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Methylene Chloride <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <5.0 U 4.4 5.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Styrene <0.50 U 0.17 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.40 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 U 0.41 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Tetrachloroethene <0.50 U 0.39 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Toluene <0.50 U 0.24 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1.0 U 0.50 1.0 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene <0.50 U 0.32 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 U 0.38 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Trichloroethene <0.50 U 0.37 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 18 of 36
Project Name: Red Hill LTM 112066 354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Work Order: Client: Environmental Science International, Inc. 099-13-057

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Attn: Robert Chong Received: 04/26/13 10:30

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

GC/MS GRO/EPA 8260B Volatile Organics Extraction: EPA 5030C

Client ID: Method Blank Matrix: Aqueous Units: ug/L Sampled:04/30/13 10:13

Dilution

Factor Analyte Result Qual. DL LOD LOQ

Preparation

Date/Time

Analysis

Date/Time Batch

099-13-057-25

1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.0 U 0.64 1.0 5.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Vinyl Chloride <0.50 U 0.30 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

p/m-Xylene <1.0 U 0.30 1.0 10 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

o-Xylene <0.50 U 0.23 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 U 0.31 0.50 1.0 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Gasoline Range Organics <30 U 13 30 50 1 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane (80-126%) 96% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (80-134%) 98% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Surr: Toluene-d8 (80-120%) 100% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Surr: Toluene-d8-TPPH (88-112%) 99% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

Surr: 1,4-Bromofluorobenzene (80-120%) 99% 04/29/13 00:00 04/29/13 14:20 130429L01

-Results were evaluated to the MDL (DL), concentrations >= to the MDL (DL) but < RL (LOQ), if found, are qualified with a "J" flag.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 19 of 36
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 13-04-1894

Method: EPA 6020

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Date Received: 04/26/13

Quality Control Sample ID

ES 025

MS/MSD Batch

Number

130429S05

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

04/29/13

Date

Prepared

04/29/13

Instrument

ICP/MS 03

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

Lead ND 100.0 104.8 105 107.6 108 80-120 3 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 20 of 36
Quality Control - PDS / PDSD

Work Order No: 13-04-1894

Method: EPA 6020

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Date Received 04/26/13

Quality Control Sample ID

ES 025

PDS/PDSD Batch

Number

130429S05

Matrix

Aqueous

Date Analyzed

04/29/13

Date

Prepared

04/29/13

Instrument

ICP/MS 03

Parameter SAMPLE_CONC SPIKE_ADDED PDS_CONC PDS %REC %REC CL Qualifiers

Lead ND 100.0 105.3 105 75-125

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 21 of 36
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 13-04-1894

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Date Received: 04/26/13

Quality Control Sample ID

ES 025

MS/MSD Batch

Number

130429S08

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

04/30/13

Date

Prepared

04/29/13

Instrument

GC 46

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

TPH as Diesel 1852 4000 7715 147 7537 142 55-133 2 0-30 3

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 22 of 36
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 13-04-1894

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Date Received: 04/26/13

Quality Control Sample ID

ES 025

MS/MSD Batch

Number

130429S19

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

04/30/13

Date

Prepared

04/29/13

Instrument

GC/MS AAA

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

Naphthalene ND 2.000 2.262 113 2.403 120 21-133 6 0-25

2-Methylnaphthalene ND 2.000 1.965 98 2.107 105 21-140 7 0-25

1-Methylnaphthalene ND 2.000 2.064 103 2.193 110 20-140 6 0-25

Acenaphthylene ND 2.000 2.211 111 2.349 117 33-145 6 0-25

Acenaphthene ND 2.000 2.273 114 2.404 120 49-121 6 0-25

Fluorene ND 2.000 2.300 115 2.434 122 59-121 6 0-25 3

Phenanthrene ND 2.000 2.517 126 2.631 132 54-120 4 0-25 3

Anthracene ND 2.000 2.013 101 2.202 110 27-133 9 0-25

Fluoranthene ND 2.000 2.409 120 2.576 129 26-137 7 0-25

Pyrene ND 2.000 2.408 120 2.515 126 18-168 4 0-25

Benzo (a) Anthracene ND 2.000 2.668 133 2.843 142 33-143 6 0-25

Chrysene ND 2.000 2.320 116 2.471 124 17-168 6 0-25

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene ND 2.000 2.504 125 2.661 133 24-159 6 0-25

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene ND 2.000 2.484 124 2.598 130 24-159 4 0-25

Benzo (a) Pyrene ND 2.000 2.384 119 2.530 127 17-163 6 0-25

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene ND 2.000 2.629 131 2.824 141 10-171 7 0-25

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene ND 2.000 2.245 112 2.382 119 10-219 6 0-25

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene ND 2.000 2.116 106 2.231 112 10-227 5 0-25

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 23 of 36
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 13-04-1894

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Date Received: 04/26/13

Quality Control Sample ID

ES 025

MS/MSD Batch

Number

130429S01

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

04/29/13

Date

Prepared

04/29/13

Instrument

GC/MS OO

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

Acetone 84.03 50.00 126.4 85 172.6 177 40-140 31 0-20 3,4

Benzene ND 50.00 46.76 94 52.28 105 80-120 11 0-20

Bromodichloromethane ND 50.00 45.41 91 52.48 105 75-120 14 0-20

Bromoform ND 50.00 49.00 98 54.95 110 70-130 11 0-20

Bromomethane ND 50.00 47.92 96 48.13 96 30-145 0 0-20

2-Butanone ND 50.00 53.60 107 56.72 113 30-150 6 0-20

Carbon Tetrachloride ND 50.00 46.86 94 50.96 102 65-140 8 0-20

Chlorobenzene ND 50.00 48.57 97 54.81 110 80-120 12 0-20

Chloroethane ND 50.00 47.94 96 51.43 103 60-135 7 0-20

Chloroform ND 50.00 47.46 95 52.64 105 65-135 10 0-20

Chloromethane ND 50.00 32.20 64 37.41 75 40-125 15 0-20

Dibromochloromethane ND 50.00 46.03 92 52.32 105 60-135 13 0-20

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND 50.00 43.05 86 46.53 93 50-130 8 0-20

1,2-Dibromoethane ND 50.00 47.22 94 53.21 106 80-120 12 0-20

1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 47.91 96 54.34 109 70-120 13 0-20

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 48.59 97 54.78 110 75-125 12 0-20

1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.00 45.64 91 51.63 103 75-125 12 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethane ND 50.00 44.90 90 49.63 99 70-135 10 0-20

1,2-Dichloroethane ND 50.00 46.45 93 52.02 104 70-130 11 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 33.44 67 41.75 84 70-130 22 0-20 3,4

c-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 47.47 95 52.95 106 70-125 11 0-20

t-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 50.00 49.18 98 53.88 108 60-140 9 0-20

1,2-Dichloropropane ND 50.00 47.13 94 53.51 107 75-125 13 0-20

c-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 50.00 48.01 96 53.34 107 70-130 11 0-20

t-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 50.00 43.31 87 48.56 97 55-140 11 0-20

Ethylbenzene ND 50.00 48.07 96 53.56 107 75-125 11 0-20

Methylene Chloride ND 50.00 47.86 96 52.68 105 55-140 10 0-20

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone ND 50.00 46.00 92 53.30 107 60-135 15 0-20

Styrene ND 50.00 48.15 96 54.32 109 65-135 12 0-20

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 50.00 47.33 95 53.30 107 80-130 12 0-20

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 50.00 28.79 58 28.35 57 65-130 2 0-20 3

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 24 of 36
Quality Control - Spike/Spike Duplicate

Work Order No: 13-04-1894

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Environmental Science International, Inc.

Project Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Date Received: 04/26/13

Quality Control Sample ID

ES 025

MS/MSD Batch

Number

130429S01

Matrix

Aqueous

Date

Analyzed

04/29/13

Date

Prepared

04/29/13

Instrument

GC/MS OO

MS

%REC

MSD

%REC

SPIKE %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers

ADDED

Parameter SAMPLE

CONC

MS

CONC

MSD

CONC

Tetrachloroethene ND 50.00 67.27 135 74.63 149 45-150 10 0-20

Toluene ND 50.00 47.53 95 53.47 107 75-120 12 0-20

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 50.00 46.36 93 52.70 105 65-135 13 0-20

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 50.00 47.26 95 53.04 106 65-130 12 0-20

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene ND 50.00 46.97 94 51.59 103 50-140 9 0-20

1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 50.00 46.64 93 52.02 104 75-125 11 0-20

Trichloroethene ND 50.00 60.74 121 72.09 144 70-125 17 0-20 3

1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 50.00 47.50 95 54.35 109 75-125 13 0-20

Vinyl Chloride ND 50.00 41.62 83 45.02 90 50-145 8 0-20

p/m-Xylene ND 100.0 92.75 93 103.6 104 75-130 11 0-20

o-Xylene ND 50.00 48.22 96 54.52 109 80-120 12 0-20

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) ND 50.00 45.66 91 51.39 103 65-125 12 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 25 of 36
Quality Control - Laboratory Control Sample

Preparation: EPA 3020A Total

Method: EPA 6020

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Red Hill LTM 112066

13-04-1894

Date Received:

Work Order No:

Project:

N/A

Quality Control Sample ID

099-14-497-27

Matrix

Aqueous

LCS Batch Number

130429L05D

Lab File ID

130429-L-05__163.icp

Instrument

ICP/MS 03

Date Analyzed

04/29/13

Parameter Conc Added Conc Recovered LCS %Rec %Rec CL Qualifiers

Lead 100.0 97.92 98 80-120

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 26 of 36
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: EPA 8015B (M)

13-04-1894

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

04/29/13

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

GC 46 130429B08

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

04/30/13

Quality Control Sample ID

099-15-516-41

Parameter %REC CL RPD RPD CL Qualifiers LCS

%REC

LCSD

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

TPH as Diesel 4000 4373 109 4226 106 60-132 3 0-11

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 27 of 36
Quality Control - Laboratory Control Sample

Preparation: EPA 3510C

Method: EPA 8270C SIM PAHs

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

Red Hill LTM 112066

13-04-1894

Date Received:

Work Order No:

Project:

N/A

Quality Control Sample ID

099-15-148-13

Matrix

Aqueous

LCS Batch Number

130429L19

Lab File ID

30APR015.rr

Instrument

GC/MS AAA

Date Analyzed

04/30/13

Parameter Conc Added Conc Recovered LCS %Rec %Rec CL ME_CL Qualifiers

Naphthalene 2.000 2.307 115 21-133 2-152

2-Methylnaphthalene 2.000 2.195 110 21-140 1-160

1-Methylnaphthalene 2.000 2.314 116 20-140 0-160

Acenaphthylene 2.000 2.235 112 33-145 14-164

Acenaphthene 2.000 2.335 117 55-121 44-132

Fluorene 2.000 2.322 116 59-121 49-131

Phenanthrene 2.000 2.323 116 54-120 43-131

Anthracene 2.000 2.332 117 27-133 9-151

Fluoranthene 2.000 2.375 119 26-137 8-156

Pyrene 2.000 2.431 122 45-129 31-143

Benzo (a) Anthracene 2.000 2.521 126 33-143 15-161

Chrysene 2.000 2.355 118 17-168 0-193

Benzo (k) Fluoranthene 2.000 2.436 122 24-159 2-182

Benzo (b) Fluoranthene 2.000 2.412 121 24-159 2-182

Benzo (a) Pyrene 2.000 2.235 112 17-163 0-187

Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene 2.000 2.471 124 25-175 0-200

Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene 2.000 2.042 102 25-175 0-200

Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene 2.000 1.973 99 25-157 3-179

Total number of LCS compounds :

Total number of ME compounds:

Total number of ME compounds allowed :

LCS ME CL validation result :

18

0

Pass

1

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 28 of 36
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

13-04-1894

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

04/29/13

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

GC/MS OO 130429L01

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

04/29/13

Quality Control Sample ID

099-13-057-25

Parameter %REC CL RPD CL Qualifiers

LCSD

%REC ME_CL RPD

LCS

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

Acetone 50.00 63.27 127 57.80 116 40-140 23-157 9 0-20

Benzene 50.00 51.79 104 49.87 100 80-120 73-127 4 0-20

Bromodichloromethane 50.00 53.59 107 52.03 104 75-120 68-128 3 0-20

Bromoform 50.00 57.99 116 56.74 113 70-130 60-140 2 0-20

Bromomethane 50.00 50.23 100 42.26 85 30-145 11-164 17 0-20

2-Butanone 50.00 55.79 112 60.24 120 30-150 10-170 8 0-20

Carbon Tetrachloride 50.00 54.44 109 51.48 103 65-140 52-152 6 0-20

Chlorobenzene 50.00 55.85 112 52.49 105 80-120 73-127 6 0-20

Chloroethane 50.00 56.31 113 46.85 94 60-135 48-148 18 0-20

Chloroform 50.00 54.98 110 51.34 103 65-135 53-147 7 0-20

Chloromethane 50.00 39.82 80 37.13 74 40-125 26-139 7 0-20

Dibromochloromethane 50.00 56.52 113 52.23 104 60-135 48-148 8 0-20

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 50.00 55.49 111 55.19 110 50-130 37-143 1 0-20

1,2-Dibromoethane 50.00 56.16 112 53.50 107 80-120 73-127 5 0-20

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 56.24 112 53.12 106 70-120 62-128 6 0-20

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 55.14 110 52.47 105 75-125 67-133 5 0-20

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 50.00 52.89 106 49.82 100 75-125 67-133 6 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethane 50.00 52.77 106 49.65 99 70-135 59-146 6 0-20

1,2-Dichloroethane 50.00 53.59 107 51.76 104 70-130 60-140 3 0-20

1,1-Dichloroethene 50.00 48.95 98 44.00 88 70-130 60-140 11 0-20

c-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.00 53.05 106 51.34 103 70-125 61-134 3 0-20

t-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.00 55.19 110 51.89 104 60-140 47-153 6 0-20

1,2-Dichloropropane 50.00 54.64 109 51.84 104 75-125 67-133 5 0-20

c-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.00 56.56 113 53.61 107 70-130 60-140 5 0-20

t-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.00 51.58 103 49.19 98 55-140 41-154 5 0-20

Ethylbenzene 50.00 53.63 107 51.19 102 75-125 67-133 5 0-20

Methylene Chloride 50.00 54.84 110 50.93 102 55-140 41-154 7 0-20

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 50.00 54.88 110 55.74 111 60-135 48-148 2 0-20

Styrene 50.00 55.75 111 52.16 104 65-135 53-147 7 0-20

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.00 55.56 111 53.06 106 80-130 72-138 5 0-20

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.00 52.71 105 52.42 105 65-130 54-141 1 0-20

Tetrachloroethene 50.00 50.86 102 46.43 93 45-150 28-168 9 0-20

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 29 of 36
Quality Control - LCS/LCS Duplicate

Method: GC/MS / EPA 8260B

13-04-1894

Red Hill LTM 112066

Preparation: EPA 5030C

Work Order No:

Date Received:

Project:

Environmental Science International, Inc.

354 Uluniu Street, Suite 304

Kailua, HI 96734-2500

N/A

04/29/13

Matrix

Aqueous

Instrument

LCS/LCSD Batch

Number

GC/MS OO 130429L01

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

04/29/13

Quality Control Sample ID

099-13-057-25

Parameter %REC CL RPD CL Qualifiers

LCSD

%REC ME_CL RPD

LCS

%REC

SPIKE

ADDED

LCS

CONC

LCSD

CONC

Toluene 50.00 53.94 108 51.11 102 75-120 68-128 5 0-20

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50.00 57.24 114 53.94 108 65-135 53-147 6 0-20

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 50.00 55.84 112 52.73 105 65-130 54-141 6 0-20

Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene 50.00 55.02 110 51.10 102 50-140 35-155 7 0-20

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 50.00 53.99 108 52.64 105 75-125 67-133 3 0-20

Trichloroethene 50.00 52.88 106 50.12 100 70-125 61-134 5 0-20

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 50.00 54.53 109 55.98 112 75-125 67-133 3 0-20

Vinyl Chloride 50.00 46.64 93 42.58 85 50-145 34-161 9 0-20

p/m-Xylene 100.0 105.2 105 99.10 99 75-130 66-139 6 0-20

o-Xylene 50.00 55.39 111 52.29 105 80-120 73-127 6 0-20

Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 50.00 53.17 106 51.92 104 65-125 55-135 2 0-20

Gasoline Range Organics 1000 996.5 100 825.8 83 80-120 73-127 19 0-20

LCS ME CL validation result : Pass

Total number of ME compounds allowed : 2

Total number of ME compounds : 0

Total number of LCS compounds : 44

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . .

RPD - Relative Percent Difference , CL - Control Limit

Return to Contents

Page 30 of 36
Sample Analysis Summary Report

 WORK ORDER #: 13-04-1894

Instrument

Client Sample

 ID

Date/Time

Method Extraction Analyzed

Chemist

ID

Lab Sample

 Number

 Analytical

Location

1-A ES Trip GC/MS / EPA 8260 EPA 5030C 04/29/2013 14:46 486 GC/MS OO 2

2-G ES 025 EPA 6020 EPA 3020A T 04/29/2013 21:47 598 ICP/MS 03 1

2-I ES 025 EPA 8270C SIM PA EPA 3510C 04/30/2013 17:20 449 GC/MS AA 1

2-H ES 025 EPA 8015B (M) EPA 3510C 04/30/2013 12:42 847 GC 46 1

2-A ES 025 GC/MS / EPA 8260 EPA 5030C 04/29/2013 15:13 486 GC/MS OO 2

3-G ES 026 EPA 6020 EPA 3020A T 04/29/2013 21:50 598 ICP/MS 03 1

3-I ES 026 EPA 8270C SIM PA EPA 3510C 04/30/2013 17:47 449 GC/MS AA 1

3-H ES 026 EPA 8015B (M) EPA 3510C 04/30/2013 12:58 847 GC 46 1

3-A ES 026 GC/MS / EPA 8260 EPA 5030C 04/29/2013 16:59 486 GC/MS OO 2

4-G ES 027 EPA 6020 EPA 3020A T 04/29/2013 21:53 598 ICP/MS 03 1

4-I ES 027 EPA 8270C SIM PA EPA 3510C 04/30/2013 18:14 449 GC/MS AA 1

4-H ES 027 EPA 8015B (M) EPA 3510C 04/30/2013 14:20 847 GC 46 1

4-A ES 027 GC/MS / EPA 8260 EPA 5030C 04/29/2013 17:26 486 GC/MS OO 2

Location Description

1 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841

2 7445 Lampson Avenue, Garden Grove, CA 92841

05/02/13 1

Return to Contents

Page 31 of 36
Glossary of Terms and Qualifiers

Work Order Number:

Qualifier Definition

13-04-1894

* See applicable analysis comment.

< Less than the indicated value.

> Greater than the indicated value.

Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to a required sample dilution. Therefore, the sample

data was reported without further clarification.

1

Surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated method blank

surrogate spike compound was in control and, therefore, the sample data was reported without further

clarification.

2

Recovery of the Matrix Spike (MS) or Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) compound was out of control due to

matrix interference. The associated LCS and/or LCSD was in control and, therefore, the sample data was

reported without further clarification.

3

The MS/MSD RPD was out of control due to matrix interference. The LCS/LCSD RPD was in control and,

therefore, the sample data was reported without further clarification.

4

The PDS/PDSD or PES/PESD associated with this batch of samples was out of control due to a matrix

interference effect. The associated batch LCS/LCSD was in control and, hence, the associated sample

data was reported without further clarification.

5

6 Surrogate recovery below the acceptance limit.

7 Surrogate recovery above the acceptance limit.

B Analyte was present in the associated method blank.

BU Sample analyzed after holding time expired.

The Detection Limit (DL) is the smallest analyte concentration that can be demonstrated to be different

from zero or a blank concentration at the 99% level of confidence.

DL

E Concentration exceeds the calibration range.

ET Sample was extracted past end of recommended max. holding time.

HD The chromatographic pattern was inconsistent with the profile of the reference fuel standard.

ICH Initial calibration verification recovery is above the control limit for this analyte.

ICJ Initial calibration verification recovery is below the control limit for this analyte.

IH Calibration verification recovery is above the control limit for this analyte.

IJ Calibration verification recovery is below the control limit for this analyte.

J Analyte was detected at a concentration below the LOQ and above the DL. Reported value is estimated.

The Limit of Detection (LOD) is the smallest amount or concentration of a substance that must be present

in a sample in order to be detected at 99% confidence level.

LOD

The Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) is the lowest concentration of a substance that produces a quantitative

result within specified limits of precision and bias.

LOQ

Spike recovery and RPD control limits do not apply resulting from the parameter concentration in the

sample exceeding the spike concentration by a factor of four or greater.

Q

SG The sample extract was subjected to Silica Gel treatment prior to analysis.

U Undetected at Detection Limit (DL) and is reported as less than the Limit of Detection (LOD).

X % Recovery and/or RPD out-of-range.

Z Analyte presence was not confirmed by second column or GC/MS analysis.

Solid - Unless otherwise indicated, solid sample data is reported on a wet weight basis, not corrected for

% moisture. All QC results are reported on a wet weight basis.

For any analysis identified as a "field" test with a holding time (HT) </= 15 minutes where the sample is

received outside of HT, Calscience will adhere to its internal HT of 24 hours. In cases where sample

analysis does not meet Calscience's internal HT, results will be appropriately qualified.

 7440 Lincoln Way, Garden Grove, CA 92841-1427 TEL:(714) 895-5494 FAX: (714) 894-7501 . . Return to Contents

Page 32 of 36
Return to Contents

Page 33 of 36
Return to Contents

Page 34 of 36
Return to Contents

Page 35 of 36
Return to Contents

Page 36 of 36
APPENDIX D 

Historical Groundwater Exceedance Trends 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

200400600800

100012001400160018002000220024002600

8/4/2009

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/26/2010

10/21/2010

10/21/2010

1/21/2011

1/21/2011

4/21/2011

4/21/2011

7/21/2011

7/21/2011

10/26/2011

10/26/2011

1/24/2012

1/24/2012

4/26/2012

7/19/2012

11/7/2012

1/30/2013

4/24/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐d Concentrations for OWDFMW01

DOH EAL GDOH EAL DTPH‐d (μg/L
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
0

50

100150200250300350400450500550600650

10/13/2009

1/26/2010

4/26/2010

7/8/2010

10/21/2010

1/21/2011

4/21/2011

7/21/2011

10/26/2011

1/24/2012

4/26/2012

7/19/2012

11/7/2012

1/30/2013

4/24/2013

Concentration (μg/L)

Date

TPH‐d Concentrations for HDMW2253‐03

DOH EAL GDOH EAL DTPH‐d (μg/L
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
APPENDIX E 

Waste Disposal Manifest 
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.