alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4493 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the impaneling of a 

new jury if a jury fails to recommend by unanimous vote a sentence 

for conviction of a crime punishable by death. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2017 

Mr. MARINO (for himself and Mr. BARLETTA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the 

impaneling of a new jury if a jury fails to recommend 

by unanimous vote a sentence for conviction of a crime 

punishable by death. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Eric’s Law’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4493 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO IMPANEL A NEW JURY IN CER2 TAIN CASES. 

3 (a) ADDITIONAL GROUND FOR IMPANELING JURY.— 

4 Section 3593(b)(2) of title 18, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph 

7 (C); and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(E) a new special hearing is required pur10 suant to subsection (g); or’’. 

11 (b) IMPANELING OF NEW JURY WHEN JURY DOES

12 NOT REACH A UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION.—Section 

13 3593 of such title is amended by adding at the end the 

14 following: 

15 ‘‘(g) SPECIAL RULE WHEN JURY DOES NOT RE16 TURN A UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION.— 

17 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If a jury described in sub18 section (b)(1) or subparagraphs (A) through (D) of 

19 subsection (b)(2) does not, by unanimous vote, make 

20 a recommendation whether the defendant should be 

21 sentenced to death, to life imprisonment without 

22 possibility of release, or some other lesser sentence 

23 pursuant to subsection (e), the court, upon motion 

24 of the attorney for the government, shall order a 

25 new special hearing and impanel a new jury pursu26 ant to subsection (b). 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4493 IH

1 ‘‘(2) IMPOSITION OF SENTENCE.—If the jury 

2 impaneled pursuant to paragraph (1) does not reach 

3 a unanimous recommendation as to sentence, the 

4 court shall impose a sentence other than death au5 thorized by law.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H5774-H5775]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1220
                            9/11 ANNIVERSARY

  (Mrs. MALONEY asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mrs. MALONEY. Madam Speaker, today we mark the 11th anniversary of 9/
11. The tragedy that day still burns in our hearts, and once again, we 
renew our pledge to ``never forget.'' The thousands who died and the 
thousands who rushed to rescue them truly deserve this moment of honor 
and remembrance; but today, there is also good news for those who 
became sick as a direct result of being exposed to the deadly toxins.
  As part of the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, which 
Speaker Pelosi and my colleagues in the House and especially the New 
York delegation fought so hard to pass, the World Trade Center Health 
Program ruled yesterday that 50 kinds of cancer will now be included 
under the Zadroga Act. This important step means that those who have 
developed cancer, often years after their exposure, will have the 
opportunity to receive the needed care and compensation that they 
justly deserve.
  On 9/11, thousands lost their lives, and thousands more lost their 
health because of their exposure to the deadly toxins. Many are sick 
and dying. I am proud that the Zadroga Act can now include their needs, 
and I hope that they

[[Page H5775]]

accept, once again, the thanks of a grateful Nation.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4609 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4609

   To provide for the conveyance of a Forest Service site in Dolores 
            County, Colorado, to be used for a fire station.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2017

  Mr. Tipton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for the conveyance of a Forest Service site in Dolores 
            County, Colorado, to be used for a fire station.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``West Fork Fire Station Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) County.--The term ``County'' means Dolores County, 
        Colorado.
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Agriculture.
            (3) West fork fire station conveyance parcel.--The term 
        ``West Fork Fire Station Conveyance Parcel'' means the parcel 
        of approximately 3.61 acres of National Forest System land in 
        the County, as depicted on the map entitled ``Map for West Fork 
        Fire Station Conveyance Parcel'' and dated November 21, 2017.

SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF WEST FORK FIRE STATION CONVEYANCE PARCEL, DOLORES 
              COUNTY, COLORADO.

    (a) In General.--On receipt of a request from the County and 
subject to such terms and conditions as are mutually satisfactory to 
the Secretary and the County, including such additional terms as the 
Secretary determines to be necessary, the Secretary shall convey to the 
County without consideration all right, title, and interest of the 
United States in and to the West Fork Fire Station Conveyance Parcel.
    (b) Costs.--Any costs relating to the conveyance under subsection 
(a), including processing and transaction costs, shall be paid by the 
County.
    (c) Use of Land.--The land conveyed to the County under subsection 
(a) shall be used by the County only for a fire station, related 
infrastructure, and roads to facilitate access to and through the West 
Fork Fire Station Conveyance Parcel.
    (d) Reversion.--If any portion of the land conveyed under 
subsection (a) is used in a manner that is inconsistent with the use 
described in subsection (c), the land shall, at the discretion of the 
Secretary, revert to the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Craig Merlin Wild, Appellant

No. 06-22-00042-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 336th District Court of 

Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 21205). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

van Cleef participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgments of the 

court below. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Craig Merlin Wild, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 1, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
# C_2008209EN.01005403.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/54

---

Appeal brought on 2 May 2008 by Erika Krcova against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 18 October 2007 in Case F-112/06, Krcova v Court of Justice

(Case T-498/07 P)

(2008/C 209/98)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Erika Krcova (Trnava, Slovakia) (represented by J. Rooy, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Court of Justice of the European Communities

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

| — | Annul the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 18 October 2007 in Case F-112/06 Krcova v Court of Justice, not yet published in the ECR, |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 18 October 2007 in Case F-112/06 Krcova v Court of Justice, not yet published in the ECR,

Krcova

Court of Justice

| — | Annul the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 17 October 2005 by which the appellant was dismissed following her probationary period and, in so far as necessary, the decision of 16 September 2005 to extend her probationary period by two months, and the report on the probationary period of 12 September 2005 recommending her dismissal, |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 17 October 2005 by which the appellant was dismissed following her probationary period and, in so far as necessary, the decision of 16 September 2005 to extend her probationary period by two months, and the report on the probationary period of 12 September 2005 recommending her dismissal,

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs incurred before the Civil Service Tribunal and before the Court of First Instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs incurred before the Civil Service Tribunal and before the Court of First Instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the present appeal, the appellant seeks annulment of the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (CST) of 18 October 2007 in Case F-112/06 Krcova v Court of Justice dismissing the action by which the appellant sought annulment of the decision of the Court of Justice dismissing the appellant at the end of her probationary period.

Krcova

Court of Justice

The appellant claims that the CST ruled ultra petita and incorrectly interpreted Article 34 of the Staff Regulations of the European Communities.

ultra petita

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
         The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                        $753,134
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         610,295
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               400,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  5,894,280
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      30,039,314
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        29,844,610
<LOANS>                                     68,372,929
<ALLOWANCE>                                    690,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             108,539,229
<DEPOSITS>                                  69,356,422
<SHORT-TERM>                                16,300,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,880,298
<LONG-TERM>                                  8,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,492
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,995,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             108,539,229
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,189,361
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,408,917
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               174,825
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,773,103
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,581,799
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,669,048
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,104,055
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             250,945
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,384,321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,302,119
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     815,293
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   815,293
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.56
<LOANS-NON>                                    367,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   183,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                52,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               690,009
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              690,009
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        690,009
        



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from March 31,
1999, 10-QSB financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      12,588,323
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            13,010,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 62,171,572
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       4,356,278
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         4,419,237
<LOANS>                                    217,913,441
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,817,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             322,386,542
<DEPOSITS>                                 268,778,446
<SHORT-TERM>                                11,648,580
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,174,579
<LONG-TERM>                                  9,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,461,104
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,313,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              29,774,937
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,699,026
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              827,333
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                73,633
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,599,992
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,304,260
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,487,306
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,112,686
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  227,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              (1,128)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,573,663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,238,586
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,238,586
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   790,535
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,369,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    20,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,714,639
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  140,690
<RECOVERIES>                                    16,278
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,817,227
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,817,227
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 374-375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28878]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP24-263-000.
    Applicants: Stagecoach Pipeline & Storage Company LLC.
    Description: 4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreements Filing--
MorganStanley_Castleton (MSCG-005_390928) to be effective 1/1/2024.
    Filed Date: 12/27/23.
    Accession Number: 20231227-5080.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/8/24.

    Docket Numbers: RP24-264-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.

[[Page 375]]

    Description: Compliance filing: Cash Out Surcharge True Up Filing 
2024 to be effective 2/1/2024.
    Filed Date: 12/27/23.
    Accession Number: 20231227-5087.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/8/24.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is 
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or [email protected].

    Dated: December 27, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-28878 Filed 1-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1523]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. TRENT FRANKS

                               of arizona

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 13, 2012

  Mr. FRANKS of Arizona. Mr. Speaker, had I been present for rollcall 
vote No. 565, I would have voted ``no.''

                          ____________________
```
# C_2010134EN.01003301.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — Proges v Commission

(Case T-577/08) (1)

1

(Public service contracts - Community tendering procedure - Programme for creation of land use models - Rejection of tenderer’s bid - Action for annulment - Interest in bringing proceedings - Admissibility - Award criteria)

2010/C 134/55

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Proges — Progetti di sviluppo Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Falcetta, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Bambara and E. Manhaeve, Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission decision of 29 October 2008 not to accept the tender submitted by the applicant in a tendering procedure relating to the implementation of a programme for the creation of land use models, and also a claim for damages for the losses incurred by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders Proges — Progetti di sviluppo Srl to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Proges — Progetti di sviluppo Srl to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009.

1

---
#### Robert Lee PITMAN, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12924.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

March 15, 1961.

Rehearing Denied March 15, 1961.

Don Welch, Jr., Ed Dudley, Joseph O. Minter, Madill, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, -Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

BRETT, Judge.

This is an appeal by Robert Lee Pit-man, Plaintiff in error, defendant below. He was charged by information in the county court of Marshall County, Oklahoma, with the offense of driving an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (47 O.S.A. § 93). He was tried by a jury, convicted and his punishment assessed at ten days in the county jail. Judgment and sentence was entered accordingly on February 18, 1960, from which this appeal has been attempted.

The State of Oklahoma filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, alleging the following facts: That the judgment and sentence was imposed on February 18, 1960, and that an order extending the time for perfecting the appeal was obtained. The extension was for 60 days from February 18, 1960 in which to prepare casemade and perfect the within appeal. One further extension of sixty days having been granted, it is apparent that the appeal in this case should have been perfected within the 120 days granted the defendant. Pooler v. State, 85 Okl.Cr. 97, 185 P.2d 235; Bouziden v. State, 78 Okl.Cr. 387, 149 P.2d 99. The time for perfecting said appeal lapsed on Friday, June 17, 1960 (there being 29 days in February, 1960), but the casemade herein was not *253filed in this Court until June 20, 1960, three days after the time for perfecting appeal had expired. Stacy v. State, 37 Okl.Cr. 45, 256 P. 63; Woods v. State, Okl.Cr., 348 P.2d 1087. This we regret for we much prefer to dispose of cases upon their merits.

This Court therefore did not acquire jurisdiction within the time provided by law for considering said appeal, and the same is, accordingly, dismissed.

NIX, P. J., concurs.