alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1070 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for clarification regarding 

the children to whom entitlement to educational assistance may be transferred under Post-9/11 Educational Assistance, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 23, 2015 

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for clarification regarding the children to whom entitlement to 

educational assistance may be transferred under Post9/11 Educational Assistance, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘GI Education Benefit 

5 Fairness Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1070 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE CHILDREN TO 

2 WHOM ENTITLEMENT TO EDUCATIONAL AS3 SISTANCE MAY BE TRANSFERRED UNDER 

4 POST-9/11 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 3319 of 

6 title 38, United States Code, is amended to read as fol7 lows: 

8 ‘‘(c) ELIGIBLE DEPENDENTS.— 

9 ‘‘(1) TRANSFER.—An individual approved to 

10 transfer an entitlement to educational assistance 

11 under this section may transfer the individual’s enti12 tlement as follows: 

13 ‘‘(A) To the individual’s spouse. 

14 ‘‘(B) To one or more of the individual’s 

15 children. 

16 ‘‘(C) To a combination of the individuals 

17 referred to in subparagraphs (A) and (B). 

18 ‘‘(2) DEFINITION OF CHILDREN.—For purposes 

19 of this subsection, the term ‘children’ includes de20 pendents described in section 1072(2)(I) of title 

21 10.’’. 

22 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub23 section (a) shall apply with respect to educational assist24 ance payable under chapter 33 of title 38, United States 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1070 IS

1 Code, before, on, or after the date of the enactment of 

2 this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant toRule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asAmended**

Pursuant toRule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted), Bing Yeh, the President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.                The Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2005, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the“Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

InWitness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 16th day ofMarch, 2006.

| /s/ BING  YEH                         |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Bing Yeh                              |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, has been provided to Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and will beretained by Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Kto which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theCompany under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of theForm 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

----
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-29641, No. 333-65321, No. 333-78937, No. 333-70116, No. 333-123255, No. 333-135237, No. 333-141567 and No. 333-150929)
and on Form S-3 (No. 333-160974) of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. of our report dated November 25, 2009 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|/S/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS
LLP      
|Boston, Massachusetts November 25, 2009
# C_2010134EN.01005002.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/50

---

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2010 — Ellinikos Niognomon v Commission

(Case T-312/08) (1)

1

2010/C 134/81

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 272, 25.10.2008.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 3 (Thursday, January 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28953]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Learning, Memory and Decision Neuroscience.
    Date: January 17, 2024.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Roger Janz, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-8515, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#741e151a0e0646341707065a1a1d1c5a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82e8e3ecf8f0b0c2e1f1f0acecebeaace5edf4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 27, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-28953 Filed 1-3-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


           In connection with the Annual Report of Universal Express, Inc.
           (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June
           30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
           date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Altomare, Chief Executive
           Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
           adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
           knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


                                         By:  /s/ RICHARD ALTOMARE
                                              ---------------------
                                              Richard Altomare
                                              Chief Executive and Financial
                                              Officer
                                              Date: September 29, 2003
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the report of Wild Oats Markets, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended January 1, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof Edward F. Dunlap hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                            
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained
    in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.











|/s/ Edward F. Dunlap | 
|-------------------- | 
|Edward F. Dunlap     | 
|April 4, 2005        | 







This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or otherwise subject to
liability pursuant to that section. The certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Wild Oats Markets, Inc. and will be retained by Wild Oats Markets, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5479]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         RECOGNIZING BEN NELSON

 Mr. BARRASSO. Mr. President, I would like to take the 
opportunity to express my appreciation to Ben Nelson for his hard work 
as an intern in my Washington, D.C. office. I recognize his efforts and 
contributions to my office as well as the State of Wyoming.
  Ben is a native of Torrington, WY and a graduate of Torrington High 
School. He recently studied Interdisciplinary Studies at Eastern 
Wyoming College and will soon be a student at the University of 
Wyoming, where he will major in Political Science. He has demonstrated 
a strong work ethic, which has made him an invaluable asset to our 
office. The quality of his work is reflected in his great efforts over 
the last several months.
  I thank Ben for the dedication he has shown while working for me and 
my staff. It was a pleasure to have him as part of our team. I know he 
will have continued success with all of his future endeavors. I wish 
him all my best on his next journey.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit
10.11
 EXECUTIVE
OFFICER  FORM A
 ULTRATECH, INC.
 RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT ISSUANCE AGREEMENT
 RECITALS
    NOW, THEREFORE
 Grant of Restricted Stock Units
 AWARD SUMMARY
 Participant:Award Date:Number of Shares

Subject to Award:
    

shares of Common Stock (the Shares)Vesting Schedule:
    
    The Shares shall vest in a series
of ___ (___)
successive equal annual installments upon the
Participants completion of each year of Service
over the ___ (___)-year period measured from
_________. However, the Shares may vest in whole
or in part on an accelerated basis in accordance
with the provisions of Paragraphs 4 and 6 of this
Agreement.




---



##### 



Issuance Schedule
    
    The Shares in which the Participant vests in
accordance with the applicable provisions of the
foregoing Vesting Schedule will become issuable on
the date (the Issuance Date) upon which occurs
the earliestof the following: (i) _________,
(ii) the date of the Participants Separation from
Service or (iii) the closing date of a Qualifying
Change in Control. The actual issuance of the
Shares shall be subject to the Corporations
collection of all applicable Withholding Taxes and
shall be effected on the applicable Issuance Date
or as soon as administratively practicable
thereafter, but in no event later than the close of
the calendar year in which such Issuance Date
occurs or (if later) the fifteenth (15th) day of
the third calendar month following such Issuance
Date, unless a further deferral is required
pursuant to Paragraph 9 of this Agreement. The
procedures pursuant to which the applicable
Withholding Taxes are to be collected are set forth
in Paragraph 8 of this Agreement.
 Limited Transferability
 Cessation of Service
 Accelerated Vesting
  2




---



##### 



greater
  Stockholder Rights and Dividend Equivalents
  
 3




---



##### 



Change of Control
 earliest
  Adjustment in Shares
 Collection of Withholding Taxes
  4




---



##### 



provided, however
      5




---



##### 



Deferred Issue Date. earlier
 Benefit Limit. greater
  Benefit Limit. greater
 6




---



##### 



Compliance with Laws and Regulations
 Notices
 Successors and Assigns
 Construction
 Governing Law
 Employment at Will
 7




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 ULTRATECH, INC.By:Title:PARTICIPANTSignature:Address:
 8




---



##### 



APPENDIX A
 DEFINITIONS
  Agreement
 Award
 Award Date
 Board
 Change in Control
     A-1




---



##### 



Code
 Common Stock
 Corporation
 Disability
 Employee
 Employment Agreement
 Fair Market Value
 A-2




---



##### 



Involuntary Termination
  provided, however,
  provided, however,
 A-3




---



##### 



1934 Act
 Participant
 Parent
 Plan
 Plan Administrator
 Qualifying Change in Control
 Restricted Stock Unit
 Separation from Service
 A-4




---



##### 



Service provided, however
   A-5




---



##### 



Stock Exchange
 Subsidiary
 Termination for Cause
   nolo contendere
    A-6




---



##### 



Withholding Taxes
 A-7
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

705.1 

OP 12-01200 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF WALLACE DRAKE, PETITIONER,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HON. JOSEPH E. FAHEY, ONONDAGA COUNTY COURT 

JUDGE AND KELLY REDMORE, CLERK OF THE ONONDAGA 

COUNTY COURT, RESPONDENTS. 

 

WALLACE DRAKE, PETITIONER PRO SE. 

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK BRADY OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS. 

 

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in the

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial

Department pursuant to CPLR 506 [b] [1]) to prohibit the enforcement

of a resentence. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said petition is unanimously dismissed

without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this original CPLR article 78

proceeding seeking relief in the nature of prohibition to prevent

respondents from enforcing his resentencing. “The record establishes

that petitioner failed to effect personal service of the notice of

petition and petition upon . . . the Attorney General (see[] CPLR 307

[1], [2]; 403 [c]), and similarly failed to seek an order to show

cause to authorize his use of service by mail in lieu of personal

service (see[] CPLR 308 [5]; 7804 [c]). Petitioner therefore failed

to acquire personal jurisdiction over respondent[s] (see[] CPLR 7804

[c]; Matter of Kelly v Scully, 152 AD2d 698)[, and] . . . th[at] fatal

jurisdictional defect requires dismissal of the proceeding” (Matter of

Bottom v Murray, 278 AD2d 817, 817).

Dismissal of the proceeding is also required on the ground that

petitioner failed to join and serve the Onondaga County District

Attorney, a necessary party to this proceeding (see CPLR 1003, 7804

[i]; Matter of Barnwell v Breslin, 46 AD3d 990, 991; Matter of Thomas

v Justices of Supreme Ct. of State of N.Y., Queens County, 304 AD2d

585, 585-586; Matter of Arkim v Dillon, 222 AD2d 1116, 1116).

Based on our determination, we do not reach petitioner’s 
-2- 705.1 

OP 12-01200 

remaining contentions.

Entered: June 28, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
# Towns - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Georgia Mountains Regional Commission Executive Director Heather Feldman Email h&#102;&#x65;&#x6c;d&#109;&#x61;&#x6e;&#64;&#103;&#x6d;&#x72;c&#46;&#x67;&#x61;&#46;&#103;&#x6f;&#x76;The post Georgia Mountains Regional Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,291
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                       835
<INVENTORY>                                     99,881
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               215,238
<PP&E>                                         359,146
<DEPRECIATION>                                 163,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 506,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,359
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           262
<OTHER-SE>                                     219,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   506,031
<SALES>                                        723,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               723,625
<CGS>                                          554,124
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  554,124
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               105,430
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,738
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,333
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,829
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,504
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,504
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.35
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6000]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Ms. BALDWIN:
       H.R. 6392.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution.
```
CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Samyak Veera, Chief Executive Officer and I, Tristan R. Farel, Chief Financial Officer of New Frontier Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of New Frontier Energy, Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report.
 Date:   March 4, 2010
 
 /s/ Samyak VeeraSamyak Veera,Chief Executive Officer/s/ Tristan R. FarelTristan R. Farel,Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Hasan Raqiyb, Appellant, v George J. Bartlett, as Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Swartwood, J.), entered January 11, 1991 in Chemung County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

We initially reject petitioner’s double jeopardy claim as unfounded. Although the misbehavior report alluded to a prior dismissed charge involving refusal to accept a program assignment, the misbehavior report was based on an entirely separate incident of refusing to accept a program assignment and, therefore, there is no double jeopardy violation *(cf., Matter of Fletcher v Coughlin,*161 AD2d 869, 871). Equally without merit are petitioner’s contentions that he had inadequate employee assistance and the Hearing Officer was not impartial *(see, Matter of Diaz v Coughlin,*143 AD2d 485). Not only does petitioner fail to specify or substantiate these claims, but he declined the Hearing Officer’s offer to select a new assistant and to adjourn the hearing so that more assistance could be given. We have examined petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them lacking in merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Levine, Mercure, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.