alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.63

[RETAIL VENTURES INC LOGO]

Date:

To:

From:       Dick Belter, Director Compensation, Human Resources

Subject:    STOCK OPTION GRANT APPROVAL

================================================================================

Congratulations! This is to advise you that the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors met and has awarded you the following:

# OPTIONS
STOCK OPTION GRANT:                    Shares

OPTION GRANT DATE:
OPTION GRANT PRICE:                    $ (the average of High and Low price on )
OPTION GRANT LIFE:                     10 years
OPTION GRANT VESTING PERIOD:           5 years @ 20% per year

OPTION PRICE PROTECTION PROVISION. Due to loan agreement provisions, the Company
will not grant these options until it receives certain approvals from lenders.
Regardless of when the options are actually granted, they will be considered to
vest under the Company's standard 5-year vesting schedule dating from the date
of the Board approval of the options. If any of these options would have vested
before they are actually granted, at or after that time Executive may exercise
this price protection provision on some or all of the options that would have
vested, on any day on which the Company's stock can be traded by the Executive,
and by using the same or a similar mechanism by which Company associates
exercise options. Pursuant to such exercise Executive will be compensated by the
Company in the amount of the gain, if any, represented by the difference between
the stock closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of the
exercise and the strike price per share. (For example, if Executive has 10,000
vested options or option protection shares, the price is $9.50 a share at the
time of the option exercise, and the option approval price was $5.00, Executive
would be due $45,000 from the Company under this Price Protection Provision).
Options exercised under this Price Protection Provision will then not be
granted. This Price Protection Provision does not apply once Executive's options
are actually granted.

Attached are the following documents with which you should become familiar:

1.    VCDS STOCK OPTION BROCHURE.

2.    PROSPECTUS COVERING SECURITIES THAT HAVE BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE
      SECURITIES ACT OF 1933.

3.    NOTICE OF EXERCISE OF STOCK OPTION.

Please review these materials. If you have any questions, please call Dick
Belter at 614-238-5484. Once you have reviewed the documents, please sign the
form below and return to:

            RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
            4150 E. 5TH AVENUE
            COLUMBUS, OH 43219
            ATTN.: DICK BELTER

OPtionee hereby accepts these options subject to all of the terms and conditions
on the Plan. Optionee also hereby agrees as binding, conclusive and final all
decisions or interpretations of the Committee upon any questions arising under
the Plan. Optionee acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan, as in effect on
the date of the Grant.

ACKNOWLEDGED AND ACCEPTED

___________________________       __________________________       _____________
        (Print Name)                       (Signed)                    (Date)
Exhibit 10.10


                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                              --------------------

     This  second  amendment  (this  "Amendment")  is made as of the 18th day of
February,  1998 to the Employment Agreement,  dated February 1, 1996, as amended
as of September  1, 1997,  by and between  Frank A. Falco and IDM  Environmental
Corp., a New Jersey  corporation (the "Employment  Agreement").  All capitalized
terms not defined herein shall be defined as in the Employment Agreement.

     Pursuant  to and in  accordance  with  Section  7.01 of Article  VII of the
Employment  Agreement,  the  parties  hereto  agree  to  modify  the  Employment
Agreement as follows:

     1. Section 2.06 of Article II of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted
in its entirety and replaced with the following:


               "2.06  Stock  Option  Grant.  The  Company  hereby  grants to the
               Employee an option to  purchase  from the Company Two Million Two
               Hundred Fifty Thousand  (2,250,000) shares of the common stock of
               the Company, $0.001 par value, at an exercise price of $3.719 per
               share subject to the terms and conditions set forth on Appendix A
               attached hereto and made a part hereof."


     2. This  Amendment  and the  provisions  set  forth  herein  are  effective
immediately and are merged into and made a part of the Employment Agreement.  


F:\legla\corporate\ffjf
falco2am.wpd

<PAGE>


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the day and
date herein first set forth. IDM ENVIRONMENTAL CORP.


                                         By: /s/  Joel Freedman
                                           ------------------------------------
                                                Joel Freedman, President



                                         EMPLOYEE:

                                             /s/  Frank A. Falco
                                         --------------------------------------
                                                  Frank A. Falco

F:\legla\corporate\ffjf
falco2am.wpd
# C_2011319EN.01001301.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2011 — Vion v OHIM (PASSION FOR BETTER FOOD)

(Case T-251/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark PASSION FOR BETTER FOOD - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctiveness - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2011/C 319/23

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vion NV (Best, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Klinger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: M. Kicia and subsequently by: R. Manea, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 April 2008 (Case R 562/2007-4) concerning the registration of the word sign PASSION FOR BETTER FOOD as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Vion NV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Vion NV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 30.8.2008.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 01/01-0414]

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under section 309 of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, and 13 CFR 107.1900 of the Code of Federal Regulations to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 01/01-0414 issued to Ironwood Mezzanine Fund II LP, said license is hereby declared null and void.

Bailey G. DeVries,

Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, United States Small Business Administration.

[FR Doc. 2024-00049 Filed 1-4-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 3 (Thursday, January 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 501-502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-29002]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request; Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Credit

AGENCY: Departmental Offices, U.S. Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Internal Revenue Service, as part of its continuing effort 
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the public and other 
Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or 
continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995. Currently, the IRS is soliciting comments 
concerning Form 8933, Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Credit.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before February 5, 2024 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the submissions may be 
obtained from Melody Braswell by emailing <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5505071415212730342620272c7b323a23"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="207072616054524541535552590e474f56">[email protected]</span></a>, calling 
(202) 622-1035, or viewing the entire information collection request at 
www.reginfo.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    Title: Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Credit.
    OMB Number: 1545-2132.
    Form Number: 8933.
    Abstract: Use Form 8933 to claim the carbon oxide sequestration 
credit. The

[[Page 502]]

credit is allowed for qualified carbon oxide that is captured and 
disposed of or captured, used, and disposed of by the taxpayer in 
secure geological storage. Only carbon oxide captured and disposed of 
or used within the United States or a U.S. possession is taken into 
account when figuring the credit.
    Current Actions: Form 8933 has been updated and revised to reflect 
new provisions under Public Law 117-169, section 13104.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Affected Public: Businesses and other for-profit organizations, 
Individuals or households, and Farms.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 250.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 17 hours 31 min.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 4,380.
    Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

Melody Braswell,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-29002 Filed 1-3-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2010011EN.01003803.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/38

---

Order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 16 November 2009 — Tipik v Commission

(Case T-252/08) (1)

1

2010/C 11/72

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 15.8.2008.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1




The subsidiaries of Allied Holdings, Inc. and the place of incorporation or
organization are as follows:

Allied Automotive Group, Inc. - Georgia
Allied Industries Incorporated - Georgia
Haul Risk Management Services, Inc. - Georgia
Link Information Systems, Inc. - Georgia
Allied Southwoods, Inc. - Georgia
Axis Group, Inc. - Georgia
Allied Systems, Ltd., LLP - Georgia
Inter Mobile, Inc. - Georgia
Legion Transportation, Inc. - Georgia
Automotive Transport Services, Inc. - Georgia
Allied Systems (Canada) Company - Nova Scotia
Axis International, Inc. - Georgia
Axis Truck Leasing, Inc. - Georgia
Axis North America, Inc. - Georgia
Kar-Tainer International, Inc. - Florida
Canadian Acquisition Corp. - Georgia
RC Management Corp. - Delaware
GACS Incorporated - Florida
Allied Freight Broker, Inc. - Virginia
QAT, Inc. - Florida
OSCHO, Inc. - Florida
Terminal Service Co. - Washington
F.J. Boutell Driveaway Co., Inc. - Michigan
RMX, Inc. - Delaware
Transport Support, Inc. - Delaware
Commercial Carriers, Inc. - Michigan
B&C Inc. - Michigan
Haul Insurance Limited - Cayman Islands
AH Industries, Inc. - Alberta
Kar-Tainer International Limited - Bermuda
Axis Netherlands, LLC - Georgia
Axis Netherlands C.V. - Netherlands
Axis Holdings Ltda. - Brazil
Axis Areta, LLC - Georgia
Arrendadora de Equipo para el Transporte de Automoviles,
  s. de R.L. de C.V.- Mexico
Axis Logistica, S. de R.L. de C.V. - Mexico
Logistic Technology, LLC - Georgia
Kar-Tainer International (Pty) Ltd. - South Africa
Axis Canada Company - Nova Scotia
Allied ASL Holdings, Inc.
CT Group, Inc. - Michigan
CT Services, Inc. - Michigan
Cordin Transport, Inc. - Michigan
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF ULTRATECH STEPPER, INC.

The following is a list of Ultratech Stepper Inc.'s subsidiaries including their
states of incorporation as of December 31, 1999:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         SUBSIDIARIES                                             STATE AND COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION
         ------------                                             -----------------------------------
         <S>                                                      <C>
         Integrated Lithography Systems, Inc.                     Korea
         Integrated Semiconductor Solutions, Ltd.                 United Kingdom
         Ultratech Stepper International, Inc.                    State of Delaware, USA
         Ultratech Stepper UK Limited                             United Kingdom
         Ultratech Stepper Foreign Sales Corp.                    Barbados
         Ultratech Kabushiki Kaisha                               Japan
         Ultratech Stepper East, Inc. (formerly UTS Acquisition   State of Delaware, USA
              Sub, Inc., Ultratech Capital, Inc. and Ultratech
              Stepper Capital, Inc.)
         Ultratech Stepper (Thailand) Co. LTD.                    Thailand
         U.S. Advanced Lithography LLC                            State of Delaware, USA
</TABLE>
                                                                            109
# C_2008272EN.01003603.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/36

---

Action brought on 12 August 2008 — Pescatori San Francesco di Paola e Sorrentino v Commission

(Case T-323/08)

(2008/C 272/71)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Società Cooperativa Pescatori San Francesco di Paola and Filippo Sorrentino (Vibo Valentia, Italy) (represented by: A. Maiorana, A. De Matteis and A. De Francesco, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Commission Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 of 12 June 2008, published in OJ L 155 of 13 June 2008. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Commission Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 of 12 June 2008, published in OJ L 155 of 13 June 2008.

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those relied on in Case T-313/08 Veromar di Tudisco Alfio & Salvatore S.n.c v Commission.

Veromar di Tudisco Alfio & Salvatore S.n.c

Commission

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4813 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a study 

to evaluate the role of unlicensed spectrum in offloading broadband 

traffic, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 17, 2018 

Mr. COSTELLO of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to 

conduct a study to evaluate the role of unlicensed spectrum in offloading broadband traffic, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wireless Internet 

5 Focus on Innovation in Spectrum Technology for Unli6 censed Deployment Act’’ or the ‘‘WIFI STUDy Act’’. 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4813 IH

1 SEC. 2. GAO STUDY ON THE ROLE OF UNLICENSED SPEC2 TRUM IN OFFLOADING BROADBAND TRAFFIC. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the 

4 date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 

5 of the United States shall initiate a study of— 

6 (1) the role that unlicensed spectrum plays in 

7 the development of the proliferation of Internet-con8 nected devices; 

9 (2) the role of unlicensed spectrum in managing 

10 Internet protocol traffic on licensed wireless or other 

11 broadband networks; 

12 (3) the economic benefits to providers and sub13 scribers that WiFi provides in assisting with Inter14 net traffic management; and 

15 (4) the potential avenues for, and barriers to, 

16 broad deployment of gigabit WiFi service in spec17 trum bands below 6 gigahertz at a scale that allows 

18 for rapid expanded use of new consumer devices. 

19 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after initi20 ating the study required by subsection (a), the Comp21 troller General shall submit to the Committee on Energy 

22 and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the 

23 Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of 

24 the Senate a report on the results of the study that sets 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4813 IH

1 forth the findings, conclusions, and recommendations, if 

2 any, of the study. 

Æ 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00219-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.L., J.L., 

AND K.L., CHILDREN

----------

FROM THE 360TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 360-571807-15

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant P.L. (Father) attempts to appeal from an “Order on Motion for 

Withdrawal of Counsel” signed on May 18, 2017. On June 28, 2017, we sent a 

letter to Father expressing our concern that we may not have jurisdiction over 

this appeal because the order does not appear to be a final judgment or 

appealable interlocutory order. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 

195 (Tex. 2001) (explaining that “the general rule, with a few mostly statutory 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

exceptions, is that an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment”); Davis v. 

Tex. Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., No. 03-10-00624-CV, 2010 WL 

4367076, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 5, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“A trial 

court’s order granting a motion to withdraw is not an appealable interlocutory 

order.”). We stated that unless Father or any party desiring to continue the 

appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal by July 10, 

2017, the appeal could be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(a), 44.3. Father filed a response, but it does not show grounds for 

continuing the appeal. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: July 27, 2017
Map Created: March 2016

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2014

Relative Per Capita Income Rates in Appalachia, 2014

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

Per capita income is a measure of the total personal income of 

an area divided by the resident population of the area. The 

percent of the U.S. average is computed by dividing the county 

per capita income by the national average and multiplying by 

100. The map uses critical breaks such as the national average 

to organize the data into groups of common values.

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

TENNESSEE

43.2% - 49.9%

50.0% - 74.9%

75.0% - 99.9%

100.0% - 118.4%

Percent of the U.S. Average 

U.S. average = $46,049

Appalachian average = $37,260

(Critical Breaks Classification)
Exhibit 99.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 (the Report) of MCG Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bryan
J. Mitchell, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/    BRYAN J. MITCHELLName: Bryan J. Mitchell Date:   August 14, 2002
EXHIBIT 23.1





MOORE & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED

ACCOUNTANTS AND ADVISORS

PCAOB REGISTERED











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10-KSB of FuelNation, Inc. of our report dated June 12, 2008 on our audit of the financial statements of FuelNation, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and from September 30, 2000 to December 31, 2007.



















/s/ Moore & Associates, Chartered

Moore & Associates Chartered

Las Vegas, Nevada

July 16, 2008







































2675 S. Jones Blvd. Suite 109, Las Vegas, NV 89146 (702)253-7499 Fax (702)253-7501
# Table 1

# Table 2

# Table 3

# Table 4

# Table 5

# Table 6

# Table 7

# Table 8