alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711

The Honorable Tom McDonald State Representative District 28 201 West Capitol Avenue Jefferson City, Missouri 65101-6806 Dear Representative McDonald: 

### AUG Z 22014

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND STANDARDS

Thankyou for your letter ofJuly 29, 2014, to United States Environmental Protection Agency AdministratorMcCarthy regarding the EPA'sreview ofthe national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone. The Administrator asked that I respond on her behalf. The EPA is currently inthe midst ofreviewing the ozone NAAQS. We expects to complete its review and issue aproposed rule reflecting the Administrator's decision about the appropriateness ofrevising the standards by December 1, 2014. As we move for\vard, we will take into account your comments in favor oftightening the 8-hourprimary ozone standard to a level of60 parts perbillion (ppb). Under the Clean Air Act, decisions regarding the NAAQS must be based solely on an evaluation ofthe health and environmental effects evidence. The EPA is prohibited from considering costs or ease of implementation in setting the NAAQS. However, once the Administrator has determined the appropriate level for the standards, costs are carefully considered as part ofthe implementationprocess. Your comments and recommendations will be forwarded to the docket for this rulemaking (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699) so thatthey maybe considered, along withthe recommendations of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, and other comments received, as the EPA develops its proposed decision. Again, thank you for your letter. I appreciate the opportunity to be ofservice, and hope this information has beenhelpful to you. Sincerely

Internet Address (URL) • http://www

.epa.gov RacycladiRecyclable • Printed wnh Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 25% Postconsumer)
# C_2008301EN.01002601.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/26

---

Action brought on 22 September 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland

(Case C-418/08)

(2008/C 301/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: U. Wölker and A.A. Gilly, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Ireland

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 concerning environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage (1), or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 concerning environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage (1), or in any event by failing to communicate them to the Commission, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive;

1

| — | order Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive had to be transposed expired on 30 April 2007.

---

(1)  OJ L 143, p. 56.

1

---
**Exhibit 15.1**

May 8, 2009 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders 

MCG Capital Corporation 

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-137565)pertaining to the Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation and the 2006 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation of our report dated May 8, 2009 relating to the unauditedconsolidated interim financial statements and schedules of MCG Capital Corporation included in its Form 10-Q for the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (the “Report”) of MCG Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Keith Kennedy, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:


|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/ KEITH KENNEDYName:Keith KennedyTitle:Chief Executive OfficerDateJuly 28, 2015
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14
- 6004

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. BOBBY LEE BROADDUS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Graham C. Mullen , Senior District Judge. ( 3:99

- cr - 00194

- GCM

- 1; 3:12

- cv - 00432

- GCM )

Submitted : January 9, 2019 Decided: January 28, 2019

Before WYNN and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Bobby Lee Broaddus, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Bobby Lee Broaddus seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating t hat reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude tha t Broaddus has not made the requisite showing. ∗ Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

∗ We conclude that Broaddus is not aided by our recent decisions in United States v. Wheeler , 886 F.3d 415 (4th Cir. 2018), petition for cert. filed (No. 18

- 420) (U.S. Oct. 3, 2018), or Lester v. Flournoy , 909 F.3d 708 (4th Cir. 2018). Rather , his case is controlled by Whiteside v. United States , 775 F.3d 180 (4th Cir. 2014) (en banc).3 contentions are adequately pres ented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph L. Cowan,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, Manugistics Group, Inc.’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28,2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information containedin such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of ManugisticsGroup, Inc.

 
| Dated: May 15, 2006 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Joseph L. Cowan                                    |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   |   |   | Joseph L. Cowan                                        |
|                     |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer  (Principal executive officer) |

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Kto which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofManugistics Group, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or afterthe date of the Annual Report on Form 10-K), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Manugistics Group, Inc. and will be retained byManugistics Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its Staff upon request.

----
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4779 

To protect States and individuals in States that have laws which permit 

the use of cannabis, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2018 

Ms. LEE (for herself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. POLIS, 

and Ms. TITUS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To protect States and individuals in States that have laws 

which permit the use of cannabis, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restraining Excessive 

5 Federal Enforcement & Regulations of Cannabis Act of 

6 2018’’ or the ‘‘REFER Act of 2018’’. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4779 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON THE USE OF FUNDS. 

2 None of the funds made available by any Act of Con3 gress to any department or agency of the United States 

4 may be used to— 

5 (1) prevent a State or unit of local government 

6 from implementing or maintaining its State law or 

7 regulation that authorizes the use, distribution, pos8 session, or cultivation of cannabis; 

9 (2) detain, prosecute, sentence, or initiate civil 

10 proceedings against an individual, business or prop11 erty, that is involved in the cultivation, distribution, 

12 possession, dispensation, or use of cannabis, in ac13 cordance with the law or regulation of the State or 

14 unit of local government in which the individual is 

15 located; or 

16 (3) penalize a financial institution solely be17 cause the institution provides financial services to an 

18 entity that is a manufacturer, producer, or a person 

19 that participates in any business or organized activ20 ity that involves handling cannabis or cannabis prod21 ucts, or any related activity, and engages in such ac22 tivity pursuant to a law or regulation established by 

23 a State or a unit of local government in which the 

24 financial institution is located. 

25 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

26 In this Act: 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4779 IH

1 (1) The term ‘‘financial institution’’ has the 

2 meaning given such term in section 5312 of title 31, 

3 United States Code. 

4 (2) The term ‘‘State’’ means any State, the 

5 District of Columbia, any territory or possession of 

6 the United States, or any Indian tribal government. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.20


EXPERT CONSENT
 I, Gary Giroux, do hereby consent to (i) the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate on the Lemarchant Deposit, South Tally Pond VMS Project, Central Newfoundland,Canada" dated March 2, 2012 (the “Report”) and the resource estimation information pertaining to the Report in the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) for the year ended December 31, 2013 of Canadian Zinc Corporation (the “Company”) and (ii) the use of my name in the AIF and the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto incorporating by reference the Company’s AIF.
 Dated this 20thday of March, 2014.
 /s/ Gary Giroux
 Name: Gary Giroux
EXHIBIT 23.1
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-3 (No. 333-81982) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-72656 and33-74616) of our report dated January 31, 2003 relating to the financialstatements, which appears in the 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders of AetriumIncorporated, which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2002. We also consent to incorporation by reference of ourreport dated January 31, 2003 relating to the financial statement schedule,which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 27, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ALLIED HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          13,984
<SECURITIES>                                    44,325
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,058
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,949
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               225,617
<PP&E>                                         287,838
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 649,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          128,771
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   649,920
<SALES>                                      1,081,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,081,309
<CGS>                                        1,051,426
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,051,426
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,727
<INCOME-TAX>                                       178
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,549
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,549
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.3







[ENERSYS LETTERHEAD]






 



 










JOHN D. CRAIG 



Chairman, President & CEO






 






 



 







	


April 13, 2005











 



Mr. Richard W. Zuidema



1932 Wickford Place



Wyomissing PA  19610







Dear Richard:






With reference to your employment agreement (the "Employment Agreement") with EnerSys Delaware Inc., f/k/a Yuasa, Inc., (the "Company"), dated November 9, 2000, pursuant to which you are currently employed as Executive Vice President Administration of the Company, we confirm that your salary as set forth in Section 3 of the Employment Agreement is increased to $345,000.00, effective as of April 1, 2005.






Except as expressly set forth in the letter, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.






	


ENERSYS DELAWARE INC.







 

	


By:
	


/s/ John D. Craig
	

	 	


John D. Craig



Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
# FY 2002 - Appalachian Regional Commission

- County Economic Status in Appalachia, FY 2002 This map shows ARC's economic classification of the 410 counties in the Appalachian Region for FY 2002 (October 1, 2001 through September 30, 2002).The post County Economic Status in Appalachia, FY 2002 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2008171EN.01004101.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/41

---

Action brought on 29 April 2008 — Arbeitsgemeinschaft Golden Toast v OHIM (Golden Toast)

(Case T-163/08)

(2008/C 171/79)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Golden Toast e.V. (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Späth and G. Hasselblatt, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 31 January 2008 (Case R 761/2007-1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 31 January 2008 (Case R 761/2007-1);

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘Golden Toast’ for goods and services in Classes 5, 8, 9, 11, 14, 16, 21, 24, 25, 28-32, 39 and 41-44 (Application No 4 811 171).

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Application refused in part, in respect of the goods in Classes 11 and 30.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Breach of the obligation under the first sentence of Article 73 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) to state reasons, in that the appealed decision was based on lack of distinctive character within the meaning of Article 7(1)(b) of that regulation, although that was not examined. In addition, infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94, in that the conditions for the finding of descriptiveness of the trade mark applied for were misconstrued.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ZBB Energy Corporation (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Geoffrey D. Hann, Prinicpal Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to ZBB Energy Corporation and will be retained by ZBB Energy
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.





/s/  Geoffrey
                D. HannGeoffrey
                D. Hann*(Principal
                Financial Officer)*





November
      14, 2007
**Exhibit 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES OFREGISTRANT**

Royale Coach by Monaco, Inc., an IndianaCorporation.

MCC Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware Corporation.

Outdoor Resorts of Las Vegas, Inc., a NevadaCorporation.

Naples Motorcoach Resort, Inc., a FloridaCorporation.

Outdoor Resorts Motorcoach Country Club, Inc., aCalifornia Corporation.

La Quinta Motorcoach Resort, Inc., a CaliforniaCorporation.

R-Vision Holdings LLC, a Delaware Limited LiabilityCompany.

R-Vision, Inc., an Indiana Corporation.

R-Vision Motorized, LLC, an Indiana Limited LiabilityCompany

Roadmaster LLC, an Indiana Limited Liability Company.

Bison Manufacturing, LLC, an Indiana Limited LiabilityCompany.

----
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IVI Communications, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements
                  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                  1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: January 11, 2004         /s/ Charles Roodenburg
                               ----------------------
                               Charles Roodenburg, Chief Financial Officer