alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4590 

To provide an exception to certain mandatory minimum sentence requirements 

for a person employed outside the United States by a Federal agency, 

who uses, carries, or possesses the firearm during and in relation to 

a crime of violence committed while on-duty with a firearm required 

to be carried while on-duty. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2017 

Mr. BURGESS (for himself, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. COLE, and Mr. 

WENSTRUP) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide an exception to certain mandatory minimum sentence requirements for a person employed outside the 

United States by a Federal agency, who uses, carries, 

or possesses the firearm during and in relation to a 

crime of violence committed while on-duty with a firearm 

required to be carried while on-duty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4590 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO CERTAIN MANDATORY MIN2 IMUM SENTENCING REQUIREMENTS FOR 

3 PERSON EMPLOYED OUTSIDE THE UNITED 

4 STATES BY A FEDERAL AGENCY, WHO USES, 

5 CARRIES, OR POSSESSES A FIREARM DURING 

6 AND IN RELATION TO A CRIME OF VIOLENCE 

7 COMMITTED WHILE ON-DUTY WITH A FIRE8 ARM REQUIRED TO BE CARRIED WHILE ON9 DUTY. 

10 Section 3261 of title 18, United States Code, is 

11 amended by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(e) Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, 

13 if the offense is a violation of section 924(c)(1) of this 

14 title, the minimum sentencing requirements of section 

15 924(c)(1)(A) of this title shall not apply if— 

16 ‘‘(1) the person committed a crime of violence 

17 during and in relation to the offense; 

18 ‘‘(2) an agency of the United States required 

19 the person to carry a firearm while on-duty; and 

20 ‘‘(3) at the time the person used, carried, or 

21 possessed the firearm, the person was employed out22 side the United States by the agency, and was on23 duty.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Verdisys, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David M. Adams, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer
and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 15, 2004



By:

/s/ David M. AdamsDavid M. AdamsCo - Chief Executive OfficerChief Operating OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2024
EXEQUIEL S. GRANDEA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TOGO D. WEST, JR., Secretary, Dep artment of the Army, Agency, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-95- 3371-L) Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 19, 1997 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Exequiel S. Grandea, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the district court's previous order dismissing Appellant's employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Grandea v. West , No. CA-95-3371-L (D. Md. June 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# ***Annex 17.*Template for curriculum vitae for Reference Laboratory experts**

1.	Degrees and qualifications, please provide details and year.

2.	Relevant experience including posts held, with dates and responsibilities (demonstrating experience in laboratory diagnostics)

3.	Information demonstrating international recognition of your expertise: appointments, awards, membership on committees and working groups (relevant to the disease for which you are applying for designation)

4.	Publications in peer-reviewed journals and papers in press, related to the disease or pathogen for which you are applying for designation (*Please provide those publications that emphasise your expertise in the specific-disease: **bold**your****name in the title of your publications and the pathogen in question*)

Report of the Meeting of the Biological Standards Commission / February 2024	1
Map Created: October 2005.

Data Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, LAUS, 2001-2003;

U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2002;

U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census, SF3.

County Economic Status in Appalachia, Fiscal Year 2006 

(Effective October 1, 2005 through September 30, 2006) 

Each fiscal year the Appalachian Regional Commission 

classifies the Region’s counties into one of five economic levels 

based on a comparison of county and national rates for three 

economic indicators: three-year average unemployment rates, 

per-capita market income rates, and poverty rates.

0 50 100 

Miles 

GEORGIA 

ALABAMA 

MISSISSIPPI 

TENNESSEE 

SOUTH 

CAROLINA 

NORTH CAROLINA 

VIRGINIA 

WEST 

VIRGINIA 

KENTUCKY 

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA 

WISCONSIN 

MICHIGAN 

DE 

NJ PENNSYLVANIA 

MARYLAND 

NEW YORK 

Distressed (77) 

At-Risk (81) 

Transitional (222) 

Competitive (22) 

County Economic Levels 

Attainment (8)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James J. Maguire, Jr., chief executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ James J. Maguire, Jr.
-----------------------------
James J. Maguire, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 28, 2003



                                     108
Exhibit 10.9

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT

      WHEREAS,  FBO Air,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  and Ronald J.  Ricciardi  (the
"Executive") entered into an Employment Agreement dated January 2, 2004, and

      WHEREAS,  the Company and the Executive have mutually  determined to amend
said agreement as set forth herein,

      NOW, THEREFORE,  the following  amendments shall be considered part of the
Agreement and shall replace the identified paragraphs in the original,

            2. Term.  The term of  Executive's  employment  under this Agreement
      (the  "Term")  will  begin on the date of this  First  Amendment  and will
      continue,  subject to the  termination  provisions set forth in paragraphs
      11-13 below, until the third anniversary of the date hereof; provided that
      this Agreement will  automatically  renew for additional  one-year periods
      unless  either party gives  written  notice to the other not to extend the
      Term not less  than 90 days  prior to the then  next  upcoming  expiration
      date.

            4.a.  Base  Salary.  During  each year of the Term,  Executive  will
      receive a salary at the annual rate of $175,000 (the "Base  Salary").  The
      Base Salary shall be payable in equal monthly  installments.  The Board of
      Directors  of the  Company may  increase  such salary at any time and from
      time to time.

            4.c. Stock Option.  Executive shall be entitled to receive an Option
      to purchase shares of the Company's stock as follows:

                           250,000 shares April 1, 2005
                           250,000 shares April 1, 2006
                           250,000 shares April 1, 2007

      The per share price will be the listed  price as of each  respective  date
      and will vest at the time of the issuance.  The  executive  will have five
      years to acquire the stock from the date of issuance. So long as it may be
      done  lawfully,  the manner of acquisition of stock shall be structured as
      to minimize adverse tax consequences to the Executive.

      Additional  options  may be  granted  by the Board of  Directors  at their
      discretion.

Agreed upon as of April 1, 2005

COMPANY:                                    EXECUTIVE:

FBO Air, Inc.


---------------------------------           --------------------------------
Jeffrey M. Trenk                            Ronald J. Ricciardi


                                     E-159
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H5775-H5776]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1230
                       AMERICA NEEDS A FARM BILL

  (Mr. WELCH asked and was given permission to address the House for 1

[[Page H5776]]

minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. WELCH. Madam Speaker, America needs a farm bill. The Senate has 
passed a farm bill. The House Agriculture Committee on a bipartisan 
basis has passed a farm bill, and that is not being brought to the 
floor for a vote.
  We have a drought. It's the worst that we've seen in 50 years. We've 
got nutrition programs that need to be funded. We have environmental 
and conservation programs that need to be revised and passed. We have 
farmers across this land whose goal is to feed America, and they need a 
farm bill.
  Never in the history of the United States Congress has a farm bill 
passed by the House Agriculture Committee not been brought to the floor 
for a vote. There's no question that a farm bill is contentious. It 
always is. But with Frank Lucas and Collin Peterson, Republican leader 
and Democratic leader, and the Agriculture Committee working together, 
we got a bipartisan vote. Why is this not being brought to the floor?
  That it's difficult is not a reason not to do it. Bring a farm bill 
and pass it.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors Timeline, Inc.:

As independent public accountants, we
hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated June 26, 2007 included
in this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Timeline, Inc, into the previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-4386 and 333-2190) of Timeline,
Inc.

|/s/                          | Williams
      & Webster, P.S.
|---------------------------- | ------------------------------
|                            
|                            
|Williams & Webster, P.S.    
|Certified Public Accountants
|Spokane, Washington         
|                            
|June 27, 2007               

---
Counties in Bold Contain Distressed Areas

County Economic Status and Number of Distressed Areas in 

Appalachian South Carolina, Fiscal Year 2021

County Status

Economic

Areas

Distressed

Number of

Anderson Transitional 10

Cherokee At-Risk 4

Greenville Competitive

Oconee Transitional 2

Pickens Transitional 2

Spartanburg Transitional 16

Appalachian Regional Commission, June 2020
Distressed Areas in Appalachian South Carolina, 

Fiscal Year 2021

County

Census Tract 

ID Number

Anderson 5

Anderson 6

Anderson 7

Anderson 9

Anderson 104.02

Anderson 107

Anderson 114.02

Anderson 119.01

Anderson 122

Anderson 123

Cherokee 9703.02

Cherokee 9704.01

Cherokee 9704.02

Cherokee 9705.02

Oconee 304.01

Oconee 311

Pickens 108.03

Pickens 112.04

Spartanburg 203.01

Spartanburg 204

Spartanburg 205

Spartanburg 207.01

Spartanburg 207.02

Spartanburg 208

Spartanburg 210.01

Spartanburg 213.01

Spartanburg 214.03

Spartanburg 217

Spartanburg 218.02

Spartanburg 218.04

Spartanburg 219.01

Spartanburg 222.02

Spartanburg 223.03

Spartanburg 231.02

Appalachian Regional Commission, June 2020
OCONEE

ANDERSON

PICKENS GREENVILLE SPARTANBURG

CHEROKEE

0 25 50

Miles

Levels of

Economic Status

Distressed County

At-Risk County

Transitional County

Competitive County

Attainment County

County Economic Status in Appalachian South Carolina,

Fiscal Year 2021
OCONEE

ANDERSON

PICKENS GREENVILLE

SPARTANBURG

CHEROKEE

S C

County Economic Status and Distressed Areas in

Appalachian South Carolina, Fiscal Year 2021

N C

GA

Levels of

Economic Status

Distressed County

At-Risk County

Distressed Area

Transitional County

Distressed Area

Competitive County

Attainment County

0 10 20

Miles
#### TRAVELERS MUTUAL CASUALTY CO., Appellant, v. W. J. SKEER.

No. 11320.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

June 6, 1939.

Emmet H. Gamble, of Kansas City, Mo., and Howard L. Bump, of Des Moines, Iowa, for appellant.

Harry Terte, Jules E. Kohn, and Ringolsky, Boatright & Jacobs, all of Kansas City, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal, 24 F.Supp. 805, dismissed at costs of appellant, but without taxation of attorney’s docket fee in favor of appellee, on motion of appellant and stipulation of parties.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Blast Energy Services,
      Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
      M. Adams, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Principal
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: 
      August 10, 2006





By:
            /s/
                David M. AdamsDavid
                M. AdamsCo-Chief
                Executive OfficerChief
                Operating OfficerPrincipal
                Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Belden Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard K. Reece, Vice
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Richard K. Reece
---------------------------
Richard K. Reece
Vice President, Finance and
 Chief Financial Officer
March 4, 2004
<PAGE>
 
                              Exhibit 3(i).1.(b)


Certificate of Correction to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
<PAGE>
 
                          CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION OF
              AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
                            WILD OATS MARKETS, INC.
                 FILED WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF DELAWARE
                              ON OCTOBER 28, 1996

     Wild Oats Markets, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), hereby
certifies as follows:

     1.   The original Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was filed
with the Secretary of State of Delaware on May 31, 1996 under the name "WO
Holdings, Inc."

     2.   An Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation was filed with
the Secretary of State of Delaware on October 28, 1996 under the name Wild Oats
Markets, Inc. (the "Restated Certificate").

     3.   The Restated Certificate requires correction as permitted by
subsection (f) of Section 103 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

     4.   The errors to be corrected in the Restated Certificate are as follows:

          (a) The number of shares of capital stock authorized to be issued by
the Corporation in paragraph A of Article IV should be Twenty-five Million
(25,000,000) shares of which Twenty Million (20,000,000) shares shall be Common
Stock and Five Million (5,000,000) shares shall be Preferred Stock.  The Common
Stock shall have a par value of $.001 per share and the Preferred Stock shall
have a par value of $.001 per share.

     5.   Accordingly, paragraph A of Article IV of the Restated Certificate are
corrected to read as follows:

          "(a)  CLASSES OF STOCK.  This corporation is authorized to issue two
classes of stock to be designated, respectively, "Common Stock" and "Preferred
Stock."  The total number of shares which the corporation is authorized to issue
is Twenty-five Million (25,000,000) of which Twenty Million (20,000,000) shares
shall be Common Stock and Five Million (5,000,000) shares shall be Preferred
Stock.  The Common Stock shall have a par value of $.001 per share and the
Preferred Stock shall have a par value of $.001 per share."

     In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of
Correction on the 9th day of January, 1997.

                               Wild Oats Markets, Inc.


                               By: /s/ Mary Beth Lewis
                                   ____________________________________________
                                   Mary Beth Lewis, Chief Financial Officer
Order entered January 7 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 01443 - CV ALAN BARON, Appellant V. H. JOSEPH ACOSTA, AN D ACOSTA & ASSOCIATE S, P.C., Appellee s On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 14 - 08404 

### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s December 17, 2014, motion to abate appeal

. The motion is DENIED

. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
Exhibit 21



Subsidiaries of Penn-America Group, Inc.



|                                |  |                               |  |                                |  |                     |  
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ |  | ------------------- | -
|Name                            |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |  | Parent                         |  | PercentageOwnership |  
|Penn-America Insurance Company  |  | Pennsylvania                  |  | Penn-America Group, Inc.       |  | 100                 | %
|                                |  |                               | 
|Penn-Star Insurance Company     |  | Pennsylvania                  |  | Penn-America Insurance Company |  | 100                 | %
|                                |  |                               | 
|Penn-America Statutory Trust I  |  | Connecticut                   |  | Penn-America Group, Inc.       |  | 100                 | %
|                                |  |                               | 
|Penn-America Statutory Trust II |  | Connecticut                   |  | Penn-America Group, Inc.       |  | 100                 | %
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Charles Bressette, Appellant, v Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Respondent.

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Harris, J.), entered October 3, 1990 in Albany County, which denied petitioner’s application *962for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Initially we note that petitioner has been released on parole, thus rendering moot this habeas corpus proceeding *(see, People ex rel. Doyle v Fischer,*159 AD2d 208; *People ex rel. Kitchen v Sullivan,*121 AD2d 415). In any event, petitioner’s allegation that his conviction was in contravention of his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination was or could have been raised on direct appeal or by way of a CPL article 440 motion *(see, People ex rel. Rosado v Miles,*138 AD2d 808), and we see no reason to depart from traditional orderly procedure *(see, People ex rel. Grady v LeFevre,*152 AD2d 850, *lv denied*75 NY2d 702). Finally, as Supreme Court noted, habeas corpus may not be used to collaterally attack a judgment of conviction on constitutional grounds *(see, People ex rel. Sales v LeFevre,*93 AD2d 945, 946, *lv denied*60 NY2d 558).

Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Yesawich Jr., Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.