90168 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 249 / Friday, December 29, 2023 / Notices 

5 In these final results, Commerce applied the 

assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

6See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

7See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from 

Belgium: Affirmative Final Determination of Sales 

at Less Than Fair Value, 83 FR 26001 (June 5, 

2018). 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we calculated 

importer-specific ad valorem duty 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of dumping calculated 

for the examined sales to the total 

entered value of those sales. Where the 

respondent did not report entered value, 

we calculated a per-unit assessment rate 

for each importer by dividing the total 

amount of dumping calculated for the 

examined sales made to that importer by 

the total quantity associated with those 

sales. Where either the respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis within the meaning 

of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties.5

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by Citribel for 

which it did not know its merchandise 

was destined for the United States, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. 

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.6

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for the company listed 

above will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in 

the final results of this administrative 

review; (2) for merchandise exported by 

producers or exporters not covered in 

this review but covered in a prior 

completed segment of the proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

investigation, but the producer has been 

covered in a prior complete segment of 

this proceeding, then the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate established for the 

most recent period for the producer of 

the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 19.30 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the less-than-fair-value 

investigation.7 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to an administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of administrative review in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: December 22, 2023. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Use Citribel’s Quarterly Costs 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Match Citribel’s Sales Within the Same 

Quarter 

Comment 3: Ministerial Error—Currency 

Conversion for International Freight 

Expenses 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2023–28783 Filed 12–28–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) has received 

requests to conduct administrative 

reviews of various antidumping duty 

(AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) 

orders with November anniversary 

dates. In accordance with Commerce’s 

regulations, we are initiating those 

administrative reviews. 

DATES: Applicable December 29, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Brown, AD/CVD Operations, 

Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: 

(202) 482–4735. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce has received timely 

requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), for administrative reviews of 

various AD and CVD orders with 

November anniversary dates. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

various types of information, 

certifications, or comments or actions by 

Commerce discussed below refer to the 

number of calendar days from the 

applicable starting time. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 249 / Friday, December 29, 2023 / Notices 90169 

1See Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, 

Public Law 114–27, 129 Stat. 362 (2015). 

Respondent Selection 

In the event that Commerce limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews 

initiated pursuant to requests made for 

the orders identified below, Commerce 

intends to select respondents based on 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) data for U.S. imports during the 

period of review (POR). We intend to 

place the CBP data on the record within 

five days of publication of the initiation 

notice and to make our decision 

regarding respondent selection within 

35 days of publication of the initiation 

Federal Register notice. Comments 

regarding the CBP data and respondent 

selection should be submitted within 

seven days after the placement of the 

CBP data on the record of this review. 

Parties wishing to submit rebuttal 

comments should submit those 

comments within five days after the 

deadline for the initial comments. 

In the event that Commerce decides it 

is necessary to limit individual 

examination of respondents and 

conduct respondent selection under 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act), the 

following guidelines regarding 

collapsing of companies for purposes of 

respondent selection will apply. In 

general, Commerce has found that 

determinations concerning whether 

particular companies should be 

‘‘collapsed’’ (e.g., treated as a single 

entity for purposes of calculating AD 

rates) require a substantial amount of 

detailed information and analysis, 

which often require follow-up questions 

and analysis. Accordingly, Commerce 

will not conduct collapsing analyses at 

the respondent selection phase of this 

review and will not collapse companies 

at the respondent selection phase unless 

there has been a determination to 

collapse certain companies in a 

previous segment of this AD proceeding 

(e.g., investigation, administrative 

review, new shipper review, or changed 

circumstances review). For any 

company subject to this review, if 

Commerce determined, or continued to 

treat, that company as collapsed with 

others, Commerce will assume that such 

companies continue to operate in the 

same manner and will collapse them for 

respondent selection purposes. 

Otherwise, Commerce will not collapse 

companies for purposes of respondent 

selection. 

Parties are requested to (a) identify 

which companies subject to review 

previously were collapsed, and (b) 

provide a citation to the proceeding in 

which they were collapsed. Further, if 

companies are requested to complete 

the Quantity and Value (Q&V) 

Questionnaire for purposes of 

respondent selection, in general, each 

company must report volume and value 

data separately for itself. Parties should 

not include data for any other party, 

even if they believe they should be 

treated as a single entity with that other 

party. If a company was collapsed with 

another company or companies in the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding where Commerce 

considered collapsing that entity, 

complete Q&V data for that collapsed 

entity must be submitted. 

Notice of No Sales 

With respect to AD administrative 

reviews, we intend to rescind the review 

where there are no suspended entries 

for a company or entity under review 

and/or where there are no suspended 

entries under the company-specific case 

number for that company or entity. 

Where there may be suspended entries, 

if a producer or exporter named in this 

notice of initiation had no exports, 

sales, or entries during the POR, it may 

notify Commerce of this fact within 30 

days of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register for Commerce to 

consider how to treat suspended entries 

under that producer’s or exporter’s 

company-specific case number. 

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a 

party that has requested a review may 

withdraw that request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. The 

regulation provides that Commerce may 

extend this time if it is reasonable to do 

so. Determinations by Commerce to 

extend the 90-day deadline will be 

made on a case-by-case basis. 

Deadline for Particular Market 

Situation Allegation 

Section 504 of the Trade Preferences 

Extension Act of 2015 amended the Act 

by adding the concept of a particular 

market situation (PMS) for purposes of 

constructed value under section 773(e) 

of the Act.1 Section 773(e) of the Act 

states that ‘‘if a particular market 

situation exists such that the cost of 

materials and fabrication or other 

processing of any kind does not 

accurately reflect the cost of production 

in the ordinary course of trade, the 

administering authority may use 

another calculation methodology under 

this subtitle or any other calculation 

methodology.’’ When an interested 

party submits a PMS allegation pursuant 

to section 773(e) of the Act, Commerce 

will respond to such a submission 

consistent with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v). 

If Commerce finds that a PMS exists 

under section 773(e) of the Act, then it 

will modify its dumping calculations 

appropriately. 

Neither section 773(e) of the Act nor 

19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v) set a deadline 

for the submission of PMS allegations 

and supporting factual information. 

However, in order to administer section 

773(e) of the Act, Commerce must 

receive PMS allegations and supporting 

factual information with enough time to 

consider the submission. Thus, should 

an interested party wish to submit a 

PMS allegation and supporting new 

factual information pursuant to section 

773(e) of the Act, it must do so no later 

than 20 days after submission of initial 

responses to section D of the 

questionnaire. 

Separate Rates 

In proceedings involving non-market 

economy (NME) countries, Commerce 

begins with a rebuttable presumption 

that all companies within the country 

are subject to government control and, 

thus, should be assigned a single AD 

deposit rate. It is Commerce’s policy to 

assign all exporters of merchandise 

subject to an administrative review in 

an NME country this single rate unless 

an exporter can demonstrate that it is 

sufficiently independent so as to be 

entitled to a separate rate. 

To establish whether a firm is 

sufficiently independent from 

government control of its export 

activities to be entitled to a separate 

rate, Commerce analyzes each entity 

exporting the subject merchandise. In 

accordance with the separate rates 

criteria, Commerce assigns separate 

rates to companies in NME cases only 

if respondents can demonstrate the 

absence of both de jure and de facto 

government control over export 

activities. 

All firms listed below that wish to 

qualify for separate rate status in the 

administrative reviews involving NME 

countries must complete, as 

appropriate, either a Separate Rate 

Application or Certification, as 

described below. For these 

administrative reviews, in order to 

demonstrate separate rate eligibility, 

Commerce requires entities for whom a 

review was requested, that were 

assigned a separate rate in the most 

recent segment of this proceeding in 

which they participated, to certify that 

they continue to meet the criteria for 

obtaining a separate rate. The Separate 

Rate Certification form will be available 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
90170 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 249 / Friday, December 29, 2023 / Notices 

2Such entities include entities that have not 

participated in the proceeding, entities that were 

preliminarily granted a separate rate in any 

currently incomplete segment of the proceeding 

(e.g., an ongoing administrative review, new 

shipper review, etc.) and entities that lost their 

separate rate in the most recently completed 

segment of the proceeding in which they 

participated. 

3Only changes to the official company name, 

rather than trade names, need to be addressed via 

a Separate Rate Application. Information regarding 

new trade names may be submitted via a Separate 

Rate Certification. 4 In the initiation notice that published on 

November 15, 2023 (88 FR 78298) Commerce 

inadvertently did not clarify the entries covered by 

the review with respect to the company listed in 

this notice. In this notice, we are clarifying that 

entries of merchandise produced and exported by 

Dear Year Brothers Mfg. Co., Ltd or produced by 

Fool Shing Enterprise Co., Ltd, and exported by 

Dear Year Brothers Mfg. Co., Ltd or produced by 

Hong Tai Enterprise and exported by Dear Year 

Brothers Mfg. Co., Ltd are excluded from the 

antidumping duty order. This exclusion is not 

applicable to merchandise exported to the United 

States by Dear Year Brothers Mfg. Co., Ltd in any 

other producer/exporter combination or by third 

parties that sourced subject merchandise from the 

excluded producer/exporter combinations. See 

Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge from 

Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China: 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 53632 (September 

1, 2010). 

on Commerce’s website at https://

access.trade.gov/Resources/nme/nmesep-rate.html on the date of publication 

of this Federal Register notice. In 

responding to the certification, please 

follow the ‘‘Instructions for Filing the 

Certification’’ in the Separate Rate 

Certification. Separate Rate 

Certifications are due to Commerce no 

later than 30 calendar days after 

publication of this Federal Register 

notice. The deadline and requirement 

for submitting a Separate Rate 

Certification applies equally to NMEowned firms, wholly foreign-owned 

firms, and foreign sellers who purchase 

and export subject merchandise to the 

United States. 

Entities that currently do not have a 

separate rate from a completed segment 

of the proceeding 2 should timely file a 

Separate Rate Application to 

demonstrate eligibility for a separate 

rate in this proceeding. In addition, 

companies that received a separate rate 

in a completed segment of the 

proceeding that have subsequently 

made changes, including, but not 

limited to, changes to corporate 

structure, acquisitions of new 

companies or facilities, or changes to 

their official company name,3 should 

timely file a Separate Rate Application 

to demonstrate eligibility for a separate 

rate in this proceeding. The Separate 

Rate Application will be available on 

Commerce’s website at https://access.

trade.gov/Resources/nme/nme-seprate.html on the date of publication of 

this Federal Register notice. In 

responding to the Separate Rate 

Application, refer to the instructions 

contained in the application. Separate 

Rate Applications are due to Commerce 

no later than 30 calendar days after 

publication of this Federal Register 

notice. The deadline and requirement 

for submitting a Separate Rate 

Application applies equally to NMEowned firms, wholly foreign-owned 

firms, and foreign sellers that purchase 

and export subject merchandise to the 

United States. 

Exporters and producers must file a 

timely Separate Rate Application or 

Certification if they want to be 

considered for individual examination. 

Furthermore, exporters and producers 

who submit a Separate Rate Application 

or Certification and subsequently are 

selected as mandatory respondents will 

no longer be eligible for separate rate 

status unless they respond to all parts of 

the questionnaire as mandatory 

respondents. 

Initiation of Reviews: In accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we are 

initiating administrative reviews of the 

following AD and CVD orders and 

findings. We intend to issue the final 

results of these reviews not later than 

November 30, 2024. 

Period to be reviewed 

AD Proceedings 

Argentina: Oil Country Tubular Goods, A–357–824 ........................................................................................................... 5/11/22–10/31/23 

Siderca S.A.I.C.

Tenaris Global Services S.A.

Austria: Strontium Chromate, A–433–813 ........................................................................................................................... 11/1/22–10/31/23 

Habich GmbH.

Brazil: Certain Aluminum Foil, A–351–856 ......................................................................................................................... 11/1/22–10/31/23 

CBA Itapissuma Ltda.

Companhia Brasileira de Alumı ́nio.

Germany: Thermal Paper, A–428–850 ............................................................................................................................... 11/1/22–10/31/23 

Koehler Oberkirch GmbH.

Koehler Paper SE; Koehler Kehl GmbH.

Matra Atlantic GmbH.

Mitsubishi Hitec Paper.

Papierfabrik August Koehler SE.

India: Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe, A–533–867 .......................................................................................................... 11/1/22–10/31/23 

Prakash Steelage Ltd.

Seth Steelage Pvt. Ltd.

Ratnamani Metals & Tubes Ltd.

Suncity Metals and Tubes Private Limited.

Suncity Sheets Pvt., Ltd.

Japan: Thermal Paper, A–588–880 .................................................................................................................................... 11/1/22–10/31/23 

Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd.; Nippon Paper Papylia Co., Ltd.

Mexico: Oil Country Tubular Goods, A–201–856 ............................................................................................................... 5/11/22–10/31/23 

Siderca S.A.I.C.

Tenaris Global Services S.A.

Tubos de Acero de Mexico S.A.

Mexico: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar, A–201–844 ......................................................................................................... 11/1/22–10/31/23 

Compania Siderurgica del Pacifico S.A. de C.V.

Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V., I.N.G.E.T.E.K.N.O.S. Estructurales, S.A. de C.V.

Gerdau Corsa, S.A.P.I. de C.V.

Grupo Acerero S.A. de C.V.


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 249 / Friday, December 29, 2023 / Notices 90171 

Period to be reviewed 

Grupo Simec S.A.B. de C.V.; Aceros Especiales Simec Tlaxcala, S.A. de C.V.; Fundiciones de Acero 

Estructurales, S.A. de C.V.; Grupo Chant, S.A.P.I. de C.V.; Operadora de Perfiles Sigosa, S.A. de C.V.; Orge 

S.A. de C.V.; Perfiles Comerciales Sigosa, S.A. de C.V.; Siderurgicos Noroeste, S.A. de C.V.; Simec International 6 S.A. de C.V.; Simec International 7, S.A. de C.V.; Simec International, S.A. de C.V.

RRLC S.A.P.I. de C.V.

Sidertul S.A. de C.V.

Siderurgica del Occidente y Pacifico S.A. de C.V.

Simec International 9 S.A. de C.V.

TA 2000 S.A. de C.V.

Talleres Y Aceros S.A. de C.V.

Oman: Aluminum Foil, A–523–815 ..................................................................................................................................... 11/1/22–10/31/23 

Oman Aluminium Rolling Company.

Republic of Korea: Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe, A–580–809 ............................................................................. 11/1/22–10/31/23 

Aju Besteel.

Bookook Steel.

Chan Won Bending.

Dae Ryung.

Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (DSME).

Daiduck Piping.

Dong Yang Steel Pipe.

Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.; Dongbu Steel.

EEW Korea Company.

Histeel Co., Ltd. Histeel.

Hoa Phat Steel Pipe Co., Ltd.

Hoa Sen Group.

Husteel Co., Ltd.

Hyundai RB.

Hyundai Steel Company.

Kiduck Industries.

Kum Kang Kind.

Kumsoo Connecting.

Miju Steel Mfg.

NEXTEEL Co., Ltd.

Samkand M & T.

Seah FS.

SeAH Steel Corporation; Seah Steel.

SeAH Steel VINA Corporation.

Steel Flower.

YCP Co., Ltd.

Republic of Korea: Thermal Paper, A–580–911 ................................................................................................................. 11/1/22–10/31/23 

Hansol Paper Company.

Taiwan: Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge, A–583–844 4 ............................................................................. 9/1/22–8/31/23 

Dear Year Brothers Mfg. Co., Ltd.

The People’s Republic of China: Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof, A–570–900 ................................................... 11/1/22–10/31/23 

ASHINE Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.

Bosch Power Tools China Co., Ltd.

Bosun Tools Co., Ltd.

Chengdu Huifeng New Material Technology Co., Ltd.

Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd.

Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd.

Danyang Huachang Diamond Tool Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

Danyang Realsharp Tools Co., Ltd.

Danyang Tongyu Tools Co., Ltd.

Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.

Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

Diamond Tools Technology (Thailand) Co., Ltd.

Fujian Quanzhou Aotu Precise Machine Co., Ltd.

Guangdong Sun Rising Tools Co., Ltd.

Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd.

Hailian Saw Technology Co., Ltd.

Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd.

Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd.

Hangzhou Xinweiye Tools Co., Ltd.

Hebei XMF Tools Group Co., Ltd.

Henan Huanghe Whirlwind International Co., Ltd.

Hong Kong Hao Xin International Group Limited.

Hubei Changjiang Precision Engineering Materials Technology Co., Ltd.

Hubei Sheng Bai Rui Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.

Husqvarna (Hebei) Co., Ltd.

Huzhou Gu’s Import & Export Co., Ltd.


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
90172 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 249 / Friday, December 29, 2023 / Notices 

Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation.

Jiangsu Jinfeida Power Tools.

Jiangsu Yaofeng Tools Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd.

Orient Gain International Limited.

Pantos Logistics (HK) Company Limited.

Protec Tools Co., Ltd.

Pujiang Talent Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.

Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.

Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd.

Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.

Quanzhou Sunny Superhard Tools Co., Ltd.

Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd.

Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd.

Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd.

Shanghai Starcraft Tools Co., Ltd.

Shanghai Vinon Tools Industrial Co.

Sino Tools Co., Ltd.

Suzhou Blade Tech Tool Co., Ltd.

Tangshan Metallurgical Saw Blade Co., Ltd.

Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd.

Wuhan Baiyi Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.

Wuhan Sadia Trading Co., Ltd.

Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.

Wuhan ZhaoHua Technology Co., Ltd.

Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd.

Zhejiang Shall Tools Co., Ltd.

Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd.

Zhenjiang Luckyway Tools Co., Ltd.

ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd.

ZL Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.

The People’s Republic of China: Fresh Garlic, A–570–831 ............................................................................................... 11/1/22–10/31/23 

Jilin Yilong Changbai Mountain Industrial Co.

Laiwu Ever Green Food Co., Ltd.

Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co., Ltd.

The People’s Republic of China: Forged Steel Fittings, A–570–067 ................................................................................. 11/1/22–10/31/23 

Jiangsu Forged Pipe Fittings Co. Ltd.

Qingdao Bestflow Industrial Co., Ltd.

Xin Yi International Trade Co., Ltd.

Yingkou Guangming Pipeline Industry Co., Ltd.

The People’s Republic of China: Lightweight Thermal Paper, A–570–920 ........................................................................ 11/1/22–10/31/23 

Guangdong Guanhao High-Tech.

Guangdong Polygon New Materials.

Henan Jianghe Paper.

Turkey: Aluminum Foil, A–489–844 .................................................................................................................................... 11/1/22–10/31/23 

ASAS Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., Kibar Dis Ticaret A.S., and 

Ispak Esnek Ambalaj Sanayi A.S.Ilda Pack Ambalaj Panda Aluminyum A.S..

CVD Proceedings 

India: Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe, C–533–868 .......................................................................................................... 1/1/22–12/31/22 

Prakash Steelage Ltd.

Seth Steelage Pvt. Ltd.

Oman: Aluminum Foil, C–523–816 ..................................................................................................................................... 1/1/22–12/31/22 

Oman Aluminium Rolling Company LLC.

Republic of Korea: Oil Country Tubular Goods, C–580–913 .............................................................................................. 9/29/22–12/31/22 

AJU Besteel Co., Ltd.

Husteel Co., Ltd.

ILJIN Steel Corporation.

SeAH Steel Corporation; SeAH Steel Holding Corporation.

The People’s Republic of China: Chlorinated Isocyanurates, C–570–991 ......................................................................... 1/1/22–12/31/22 

Hebei Fuhui Water Treatment Co., Ltd.

Henan Sinowin Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.

Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd.

Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd.

Linhai Limin Chemicals Co., Ltd.

Puyang Cleanway Chemicals Ltd.

Qingdao Fortune Logistics Co., Ltd.

Shandong Dongyue Chemical Co., Ltd.

Shandong Taihe Chemicals Co., Ltd.

Shanghai Special Logistics Co., Ltd.

Shanghai Tianxiang Logistics Co., Ltd.

Topdan Industries Co., Limited.

The People’s Republic of China: Forged Steel Fittings, C–570–068 ................................................................................. 1/1/22–12/31/22 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 249 / Friday, December 29, 2023 / Notices 90173 

5Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(c), Commerce 

received a request from NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. to defer 

the administrative review of this CVD order with 

respect to itself for one year. Commerce did not 

receive any objections to the deferral within 15 days 

after the end of the anniversary month. As such, we 

will initiate the administrative review with respect 

to NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. in the month immediately 

following the next anniversary month of the CVD 

order on Oil Country Tubular Goods from the 

Republic of Korea. 

6See Certification of Factual Information To 

Import Administration During Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 

17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also the frequently asked 

questions regarding the Final Rule, available at 

https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_

info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. 

7Administrative Protective Order, Service, and 

Other Procedures in Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings; Final Rule, 88 FR 

67069 (September 29, 2023). 

8See section 782(b) of the Act; see also Final 

Rule; and the frequently asked questions regarding 

the Final Rule, available at https://enforcement.

trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_

07172013.pdf. 

9See 19 CFR 351.302. 

Both-Well (Taizhou) Steel Fittings, Co., Ltd.

Yingkou Guangming Pipeline Industry Co., Ltd.

Turkey: Aluminum Foil, C–489–845 .................................................................................................................................... 1/1/22–12/31/22 

ASAS Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.

Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.; Ispak Esnek Ambalaj Sanayi A.S.; Kibar Dis.

Ticaret A.S.

Panda Aluminyum.

Turkey: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar, C–489–819 ......................................................................................................... 1/1/22–12/31/22 

Ans Kargo Lojistik Tas ve Tic Baykan Dis Ticaret.

Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S.; Colakoglu Metalurji A.S.

Icdas Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim Sanayi A.S.

Kaptan Demir Celik Endustrisi ve Ticaret A.S.; Kaptan Metal Dis Ticaret ve Nakliyat A.S.

Kibar dis Ticaret A.S.

Meral Makina Iml Ith Ihr Gida.

Sami Soybas Demir Sanayi ve Ticaret.

Yucel Boru Ihracat Ithalat ve Pazarlama.

Suspension Agreements 

None.

Deferral of Initiation of Administrative Review 

Republic of Korea: Oil Country Tubular Goods, 5C–580–913 9/29/22–12/31/22 ............................................................... 9/29/22–12/31/22 

NEXTEEL Co., Ltd.

Duty Absorption Reviews 

During any administrative review 

covering all or part of a period falling 

between the first and second or third 

and fourth anniversary of the 

publication of an AD order under 19 

CFR 351.211 or a determination under 

19 CFR 351.218(f)(4) to continue an 

order or suspended investigation (after 

sunset review), Commerce, if requested 

by a domestic interested party within 30 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the review, will 

determine whether ADs have been 

absorbed by an exporter or producer 

subject to the review if the subject 

merchandise is sold in the United States 

through an importer that is affiliated 

with such exporter or producer. The 

request must include the name(s) of the 

exporter or producer for which the 

inquiry is requested. 

Gap Period Liquidation 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

‘‘gap’’ period of the order (i.e., the 

period following the expiry of 

provisional measures and before 

definitive measures were put into 

place), if such a gap period is applicable 

to the POR. 

Administrative Protective Orders and 

Letters of Appearance 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective orders in 

accordance with the procedures 

outlined in Commerce’s regulations at 

19 CFR 351.305. Those procedures 

apply to administrative reviews 

included in this notice of initiation. 

Parties wishing to participate in any of 

these administrative reviews should 

ensure that they meet the requirements 

of these procedures (e.g., the filing of 

separate letters of appearance as 

discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). 

Factual Information Requirements 

Commerce’s regulations identify five 

categories of factual information in 19 

CFR 351.102(b)(21), which are 

summarized as follows: (i) evidence 

submitted in response to questionnaires; 

(ii) evidence submitted in support of 

allegations; (iii) publicly available 

information to value factors under 19 

CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the 

adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 

351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on 

the record by Commerce; and (v) 

evidence other than factual information 

described in (i)-(iv). These regulations 

require any party, when submitting 

factual information, to specify under 

which subsection of 19 CFR 

351.102(b)(21) the information is being 

submitted and, if the information is 

submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct 

factual information already on the 

record, to provide an explanation 

identifying the information already on 

the record that the factual information 

seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The 

regulations, at 19 CFR 351.301, also 

provide specific time limits for such 

factual submissions based on the type of 

factual information being submitted. 

Please review the Final Rule,6 available 

at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ 

FR-2013-07-17/pdf/2013-17045.pdf, 

prior to submitting factual information 

in this segment. Note that Commerce 

has amended certain of its requirements 

pertaining to the service of documents 

in 19 CFR 351.303(f).7

Any party submitting factual 

information in an AD or CVD 

proceeding must certify to the accuracy 

and completeness of that information 

using the formats provided at the end of 

the Final Rule.8 Commerce intends to 

reject factual submissions in any 

proceeding segments if the submitting 

party does not comply with applicable 

certification requirements. 

Extension of Time Limits Regulation 

Parties may request an extension of 

time limits before a time limit 

established under Part 351 expires, or as 

otherwise specified by Commerce.9 In 

general, an extension request will be 

considered untimely if it is filed after 

the time limit established under Part 

351 expires. For submissions which are 

due from multiple parties 

simultaneously, an extension request 

will be considered untimely if it is filed 

after 10:00 a.m. on the due date. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
90174 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 249 / Friday, December 29, 2023 / Notices 

Examples include, but are not limited 

to: (1) case and rebuttal briefs, filed 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; (2) factual 

information to value factors under 19 

CFR 351.408(c), or to measure the 

adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 

351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, clarification 

and correction filed pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) comments 

concerning the selection of a surrogate 

country and surrogate values and 

rebuttal; (4) comments concerning CBP 

data; and (5) Q&V questionnaires. Under 

certain circumstances, Commerce may 

elect to specify a different time limit by 

which extension requests will be 

considered untimely for submissions 

which are due from multiple parties 

simultaneously. In such a case, 

Commerce will inform parties in the 

letter or memorandum setting forth the 

deadline (including a specified time) by 

which extension requests must be filed 

to be considered timely. This policy also 

requires that an extension request must 

be made in a separate, stand-alone 

submission, and clarifies the 

circumstances under which Commerce 

will grant untimely-filed requests for the 

extension of time limits. Please review 

the Final Rule, available at https://

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/ 

html/2013-22853.htm, prior to 

submitting factual information in these 

segments. 

These initiations and this notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: December 22, 2023. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2023–28781 Filed 12–28–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

National Assessment Governing Board 

Assessment Development Committee 

Meeting 

AGENCY: National Assessment 

Governing Board, Department of 

Education. 

ACTION: Notice of open meeting. 

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the 

agenda, time, and instructions to access 

the National Assessment Governing 

Board’s (hereafter referred to as 

Governing Board or Board) special 

meeting of the Assessment Development 

Committee. This notice provides 

information about the meeting to 

members of the public who may be 

interested in attending the meeting and/ 

or providing written comments related 

to the work of the Governing Board. The 

meeting will be held virtually, as noted 

below. Members of the public must 

request registration information by 

sending an email to nagb@ed.gov no 

later than two business days prior to the 

meeting. 

DATES: The Assessment Development 

Committee meeting will be held on the 

following date: 

• January 26, 2024, from 3–3:15 p.m., 

EDT 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Angela Scott, Designated Federal 

Official (DFO) for the Governing Board, 

800 North Capitol Street NW, Suite 825, 

Washington, DC 20002, telephone: (202) 

357–7502, fax: (202) 357–6945, email: 

Angela.Scott@ed.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Statutory 

Authority and Function: The Governing 

Board is established under the National 

Assessment of Educational Progress 

Authorization Act, (20 U.S.C. 9621). 

Information on the Governing Board and 

its work can be found at www.nagb.gov. 

Notice of the meeting is required under 

section 1009(a)(2) of 5 U.S.C. chapter 10 

(Federal Advisory Committees). 

The Governing Board formulates 

policy for the National Assessment of 

Educational Progress (NAEP) 

administered by the National Center for 

Education Statistics (NCES). The 

Governing Board’s responsibilities 

include: 

(1) selecting the subject areas to be 

assessed; (2) developing appropriate 

student achievement levels; (3) 

developing assessment objectives and 

testing specifications that produce an 

assessment that is valid and reliable, 

and are based on relevant widely 

accepted professional standards; (4) 

developing a process for review of the 

assessment which includes the active 

participation of teachers, curriculum 

specialists, local school administrators, 

parents, and concerned members of the 

public; (5) designing the methodology of 

the assessment to ensure that 

assessment items are valid and reliable, 

in consultation with appropriate 

technical experts in measurement and 

assessment, content and subject matter, 

sampling, and other technical experts 

who engage in large scale surveys; (6) 

measuring student academic 

achievement in grades 4, 8, and 12 in 

the authorized academic subjects; (7) 

developing guidelines for reporting and 

disseminating results; (8) developing 

standards and procedures for regional 

and national comparisons; (9) taking 

appropriate actions needed to improve 

the form, content use, and reporting of 

results of an assessment; and (10) 

planning and executing the initial 

public release of NAEP reports. 

Assessment Development Committee 

Meeting 

The Assessment Development 

Committee will meet virtually on 

January 26th from 3–3:15 p.m. ET to 

take action on the Assessment and Item 

Specifications for the 2028 NAEP 

Science Assessment Framework. 

Governing Board policy articulates 

the Board’s commitment to a 

comprehensive, inclusive, and 

deliberative process to determine and 

update the content and format of all 

NAEP assessments. For each NAEP 

assessment, this process results in a 

NAEP framework, outlining what is to 

be measured and how it will be 

measured. Periodically, the Governing 

Board reviews existing NAEP 

frameworks to determine if changes are 

warranted. Each NAEP framework 

development and update process 

considers a wide set of factors, 

including but not limited to reviews of 

recent research on teaching and 

learning, changes in state and local 

standards and assessments, and the 

latest perspectives on the nation’s future 

needs and desirable levels of 

achievement. 

In 2021, the Board initiated a 

preliminary review of the NAEP Science 

Framework, which included an initial 

public comment on whether and how 

the framework should be updated as 

well as expert commentary to determine 

the type of updates needed. In May 

2022, the Governing Board formally 

decided to initiate an update to the 

NAEP Science Framework and issued a 

Board Charge providing guidance to the 

panels of experts who were tasked with 

developing the framework 

recommendations. Public comment on 

draft framework recommendations was 

sought in March–April 2023 and 

feedback was incorporated. The 

Governing Board adopted the 2028 

NAEP Science Assessment Framework 

during its November 2023 quarterly 

meeting. 

The Science Assessment and Item 

Specifications document provides 

additional technical and operational 

details for implementing the framework. 

During the November 2023 quarterly 

Board meeting, the Governing Board 

delegated authority for adopting the 

Science Assessment and Item 

Specifications to the Assessment 

Development Committee. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1