alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| NWRC Chemical Effects Database**Browse** data by :              Help Browsing or by Chemical :                                                                   Search for **chemical names**             Help Searching**beginning with**                                     or **containing**                                    Search for **species names**             Help Searching**beginning with**                   or **containing**           |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# C_2009282EN.01001503.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-8/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2006/17/EC - Technical requirements for the donation, procurement and testing of human tissues and cells - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

2009/C 282/29

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Cattabriga and J. Sénéchal, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: D. Haven, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt or notify, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2006/17/EC of 8 February 2006 implementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards certain technical requirements for the donation, procurement and testing of human tissues and cells (OJ 2006 L 38, p. 40)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by not adopting, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2006/17/EC of 8 February 2006 implementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards certain technical requirements for the donation, procurement and testing of human tissues and cells, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by not adopting, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2006/17/EC of 8 February 2006 implementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards certain technical requirements for the donation, procurement and testing of human tissues and cells, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 452 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 452

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
      at 324 West Saint Louis Street in Pacific, Missouri, as the 
           ``Specialist Jeffrey L. White, Jr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2017

Mr. Luetkemeyer (for himself, Mr. Clay, Mrs. Wagner, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. 
 Cleaver, Mr. Graves of Missouri, Mr. Long, Mr. Smith of Missouri, and 
Mr. Sessions) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
      at 324 West Saint Louis Street in Pacific, Missouri, as the 
           ``Specialist Jeffrey L. White, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST JEFFREY L. WHITE, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 324 West Saint Louis Street in Pacific, Missouri, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Specialist Jeffrey L. White, Jr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Jeffrey L. White, Jr. Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

Castelle and Subsidiaries                                           Exhibit 27.1
Financial Data Schedule
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  Financial  Statements for the twelve month period ending December 31,
1999 included in the  Company's  Form 10-K filed March 21, 1999 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1,000

<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                     4,714
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              1,525
<ALLOWANCES>                                               (493)
<INVENTORY>                                                1,411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           8,037
<PP&E>                                                     1,565
<DEPRECIATION>                                           (1,178)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             8,502
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      4,481
<BONDS>                                                        1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                  29,002
<OTHER-SE>                                              (24,915)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               8,502
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          16,116
<CGS>                                                      7,712
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             12,054
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              27
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         (126)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (3,551)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   4
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (3,555)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (3,555)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.78)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 89463-89464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28476]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.


[[Page 89464]]


    Name of Committee: National Center for Advancing Translational 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; CTSA Small Grant Program.
    Date: February 13, 2024.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, 
National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Room 1073, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: M. Lourdes Ponce, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing 
Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Democracy Blvd., Room 1073, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0810, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#177b78626573726439677879747257797e7f39707861"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="04686b71766061772a746b6a6761446a6d6c2a636b72">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, 
Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, 
B--Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research 
Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 20, 2023.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-28476 Filed 12-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2010221EN.01004001.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2010 — MIP Metro v OHIM — CBT Comunicación Multimedia (Metromeet)

(Case T-407/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark ‘Metromeet’ - Earlier national word mark ‘meeting metro’ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 221/64

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: CBT Comunicación Multimedia, SL (Getxo, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 June 2008 (Case R 387/2007-1) relating to opposition proceedings between MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG and CBT Comunicación Multimedia, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 12 June 2008 (Case R 387/2007-1) concerning opposition proceedings between MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG and CBT Comunicación Multimedia, SL. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 12 June 2008 (Case R 387/2007-1) concerning opposition proceedings between MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG and CBT Comunicación Multimedia, SL.

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 327, 20.12.2008.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Batts, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lombardo, J.), rendered December 5, 1988, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution, was legally sufficient to disprove the defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620). It is well settled that resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which had the opportunity to see and hear the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

Additionally, the defendant’s challenge to the propriety of the trial court’s justification charge is without merit.

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
#### Federal Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v Bott Electric, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Eric Tanel, Respondent, v Brasscrafters, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Jetson Direct Mailing Services, Inc., Appellant. (Action No. 2.) (And Another Action.)

— In three consolidated negligence actions to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Jetson Direct Mailing Services, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hand, J.), dated February 5, 1990, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in Action No. 2 and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motion for summary judgment is granted, and the complaint in Action No. 2 and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant.

Action No. 2 is one of three actions brought in connection with an incident in which the plaintiff Eric Tanel was injured. In November 1980, upon assuming tenancy of a building located in Deer Park, in Suffolk County, the defendant Jetson Direct Mailing Services, Inc. (hereinafter Jetson) hired the defendant G.P. Electric Company, an electrical contractor, which made certain electrical wiring alterations to the building so that Jetson’s machinery could be installed. In May 1983 Jetson terminated its tenancy and vacated the building.

In December 1985 the plaintiff Eric Tanel was employed as an electrician by the defendant Dennis Bott Electrical Services, Inc., sued here as Bott Electric. While working in the building in which Jetson had formerly been a tenant, the plaintiff suffered extensive burns to his face, chest, and arms when he came into contact with an electrical panel box. He alleged, among other things, that Jetson was negligent in the maintenance of the building’s electrical system.

Jetson moved for summary judgment, submitting the testimony of its president who stated that Jetson performed no electrical work at the building. The only evidence presented in *200opposition to Jetson’s motion was hearsay testimony, based on unproduced documents, stating that Jetson employees had performed electrical work there.

We conclude that Jetson’s summary judgment motion should have been granted. It is well settled that summary judgment should be granted only where there is no doubt as to the absence of triable issues of fact *(Andre v Pomeroy,*35 NY2d 361). Once the movant satisfies this requirement, the burden shifts to the party opposing the motion to produce evidentiary proof sufficient to demonstrate the existence of triable issues of fact *(Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). The only evidence presented in opposition to Jetson’s motion was the hearsay testimony that Jetson employees had done electrical work at the building. There is no legal basis on which to impose liability on Jetson, which had vacated the premises more than two and one-half years before the accident *(see, Bittrolff v Ho’s Dev. Co.,*77 NY2d 896). Accordingly the proof in opposition was insufficient to defeat Jetson’s motion. Kunzeman, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
# 2009 - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties.The post Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average.The post Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties.The post College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2008–2012 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties. The post Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2008–2012 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2008–2012 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2008–2012 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties. The post High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2009–2013 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2008–2012 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties. The post High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2008–2012 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2008–2012 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2008–2012 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# Notes

Creating a Culture of Health in Appalachia: Disparities and Bright SpotsJuly 2018Bright Spots Report Univariate Regression ResultsThe data and source information in this file were created for the Identifying Bright Spots in Appalachian Health: Statistical Analysis report, which is one of four quantitative and qualitative research reports in "Creating a Culture of Health in Appalachia: Disparities and Bright Spots."Table 9 contains the results of the univariate regression for nonmetropolitan counties; Table 10 contains the results for the metropolitan counties; and Table 11 contains a summary.The data and source information in this file are in the public domain and may be distributed and printed without permission.Funding for this project was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Appalachian Regional Commission. The nonprofit Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky was the grantee and fiscal agent for the project. PDA, Inc., in Raleigh, North Carolina, prepared this report in collaboration with the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Appalachian Regional Commission.

# Nonmetro

# Metro

# Summary
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, dated the date of
this Certification (the Report), I, Timothy L. Smith, the President and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: April 11, 2005 |  | /s/ Timothy L. Smith                 
|                     |  | Timothy L. Smith                     
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



37