alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4684 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through 

the Director of the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, to publish 

and disseminate best practices for operating a recovery housing, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2017 

Ms. JUDY CHU of California (for herself, Mrs. MURPHY of Florida, Mrs. 

BUSTOS, Mr. GONZALEZ of Texas, Mr. RUIZ, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Ms. FRANKEL of Florida, Mrs. MIMI WALTERS of 

California, Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire, and Mr. BILIRAKIS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services, 

acting through the Director of the Center for Substance 

Abuse Treatment of the Substance Abuse and Mental 

Health Services Administration, to publish and disseminate best practices for operating a recovery housing, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4684 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Access to 

3 Quality Sober Living Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. BEST PRACTICES FOR OPERATING RECOVERY 

5 HOUSING. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and 

7 Human Services, acting through the Director of the Cen8 ter for Substance Abuse Treatment of the Substance 

9 Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration— 

10 (1) shall publish best practices for operating re11 covery housing, based on— 

12 (A) the applicable domains, core principles, 

13 and standards of the National Alliance for Re14 covery Residences; and 

15 (B) input from other nationally accredited 

16 recovery housing entities and from stakeholders; 

17 (2) shall disseminate such best practices to the 

18 government of each State; and 

19 (3) may provide technical assistance to States 

20 seeking to adopt or implement such best practices. 

21 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

22 (1) The term ‘‘recovery housing’’ means a fam23 ily-like, shared living environment free from alcohol 

24 and illicit drug use and centered on peer support 

25 and connection to services that promote sustained 

26 recovery from substance use disorders. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4684 IH

1 (2) The term ‘‘State’’ includes any of the sev2 eral States, the District of Columbia, and any terri3 tory or possession of the United States. 

4 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—To carry 

5 out this section, there is authorized to be appropriated 

6 $3,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2018 through 

7 2020. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
**Order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 1 April 2009 – Perry v Commission**

**(Case T-280/08)**

Action for damages – Limitation period – Inadmissibility

Actions for damages – Limitation period – Point from which time starts to run – Liability as the result of an individual measure – Date on which the injurious effects of the measure are produced (Art. 288, second para., EC; Statute of the Court of Justice,
Arts 46 and 53, first para.) (see paras 34-39, 47-52)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of allegations of misuse of Community subsidies in the performance of certain contracts concluded by the Commission with the applicant’s companies. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Mr Claude Perry is ordered to pay the costs. |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0571 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JEFF REY ALLEN WESTFALL,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 24 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 15 2023

02/15/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0571
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Glenn Welstad, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Command Center, Inc. (the Company ) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 24, 2010 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 3, 2010





/s/ Glenn WelstadGlenn WelstadPresident and Chief Executive Officer
# Lawrence - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission Executive Director Jill Foys Email &#160;&#x6a;&#x69;&#x6c;&#x6c;&#x66;&#x40;&#x6e;&#x6f;&#114;&#116;&#104;&#119;&#101;&#115;&#116;pa&#46;o&#x72;&#x67;The post Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
 
  **RULE
13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 I, J.
Randolph Potter, certify that:
  1.
    I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Summit Financial
      Corporation;2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:a)
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;b)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and5.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)
      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date:
      February 22, 2005J.
      Randolph Potter, President and Chief Executive
Officer
# C_2010301EN.01000301.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 September 2010 — Lego Juris A/S v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Mega Brands Inc.

(Case C-48/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Community trade mark - Suitability of a shape of goods for registration as a trade mark - Registration of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the upper surface and two sides of a Lego brick - Declaration of invalidity of that registration on application by an undertaking marketing toy bricks having the same shape and dimensions - Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of that regulation - Sign which consists exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result)

2010/C 301/03

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Lego Juris A/S (represented by: V. von Bomhard and T. Dolde, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent), Mega Brands Inc. (represented by: P. Cappuyns and C. De Meyer, advocaten).

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 12 November 2008 in Case T-270/06 Lego Juris A/S v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), in which that Court dismissed an action brought by the proprietor of the Community three-dimensional trade mark in the shape of a Lego brick for goods in Classes 9 and 28 against Decision R 856/2004-G of the Grand Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 10 July 2006 which had dismissed the appeal brought against the Cancellation Division’s decision declaring that mark partially invalid in the context of the application for a declaration of invalidity brought by Mega Brands — Interpretation of Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Lego Juris A/S

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Lego Juris A/S to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Lego Juris A/S to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 4.4.2009.

1

---
D827 

Tuesday, August 7, 2012 

Daily Digest 

HIGHLIGHTS 

House agreed to S. Con. Res. 59, Adjournment Resolution. 

Senate 

Chamber Action 

The Senate was not in session and stands adjourned until Monday, September 10, 2012 at 2 

p.m. 

Committee Meetings 

h 

No committee meetings were held. 

House of Representatives 

Chamber Action 

Public Bills and Resolutions Introduced: 2 public 

bills, H.R. 6359–6360, were introduced. Page H5727 

Additional Cosponsors: Page H5728 

Reports Filed: There were no reports filed today. 

Speaker: Read a letter from the Speaker wherein he 

appointed Representative Thornberry to act as 

Speaker pro tempore for today. Page H4719 

Chaplain: The prayer was offered by the guest chaplain, Reverend Dr. Alan Keiran, Office of the United 

States Senate Chaplain. Page H5719 

Adjournment Resolution: The House agreed to S. 

Con. Res. 59, providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and an adjournment of 

the House of Representatives. Page H5719 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a correction in the enrollment of 

H.R. 4240: The House agreed to S. Con. Res. 58, 

to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives 

to make a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 

4240. Pages H5719–20 

Quorum Calls—Votes: There were no yea-and-nay 

votes, and there were no recorded votes. There were 

no quorum calls. 

Adjournment: The House met at 10 a.m. and at 

10:05 a.m., pursuant to S. Con. Res. 59, the House 

stands adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, September 10, 2012. 

Committee Meetings 

No hearings were held. 

Joint Meetings 

No joint committee meetings were held. 

f 

COMMITTEE MEETINGS FOR MONDAY, 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2012 

(Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated) 

Senate 

No meetings/hearings scheduled. 

House 

No hearings are scheduled. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with DIGEST
#### Domenico Pavone, Appellant, v Attracta M. Pavone, *277Respondent.

— Appeal by the plaintiff from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated October 3,1989.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Schneier at the Supreme Court. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Webb Mortgage Depot, Inc.
(the "Corporation") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
of the Corporation certifies that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Corporation.

 /s/ Byron Webb
-----------------------------------
Byron Webb
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Accounting Officer
November 10, 2005
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ZBB Energy Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Scott W. Scampini, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to section Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ZBB Energy Corporation and will be retained by ZBB Energy
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





/s/  Scott W.
      ScampiniScott
      W. Scampini(Principal
      Financial Officer)





February
11, 2010
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS TYRONE MICHAEL LOVE 

# I 7971 1 11,

# 1
NO. 

### 2023KW0834 

## NOVEMBER20, 2023
In Re: Tyrone Michael Love, applying for supervisory writs,



### 23rd Judicial District Court, Parish of Ascension, No. 

### 615056. BEFORE: GUIDRY, C.J., CHUTZAND LANIER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. The writ application 

### does not 

### include sentencing 

### information. Since there 

### is no evidence that relator' s sentence has 

### been 

### imposed, the writ application 

### is denied as premature. See State v. Lewis, 

### 337 

### So.2d 514 ( La. 1976). JMG WRC WIL
# C_2009006EN.01003102.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/31

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 17 November 2008 — Sanatur v OHIM — Sektkellerei Schloss Wachenheim (life light)

(Case T-222/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2009/C 6/64)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Sanatur GmbH (Singen, Germany) (represented by: M. Wiume, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Sektkellerei Schloss Wachenheim AG (Trier, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 March 2008 (Case R 1257/2006-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Sektkellerei Schloss Wachenheim AG and Sanatur GmbH

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant and OHIM shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and OHIM shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 30.8.2008.

1

---
#### Charles A. LITTON, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-11849.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Nov. 25, 1953.

Dudley, Duvall & Dudley, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q.' Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

JONES, Judge.

This is a companion case to Hisel v. State of Oklahoma, Okl.Cr., 264 P.2d 375. A complete statement of the facts is set forth in the Hisel case and reference may be had to that opinion. Hisel and Litton were jointly charged. Litton’s guilt consisted *387solely in the fact that as county commissioner, he voted for approval of the claims filed by the Metropolitan Paving Company. There was no claim and no evidence that Litton personally had anything to do with the ordering of the repairs for the Sooner Road or had any personal knowledge of the amount involved.

Since we have held in Hisel v. State, supra, that the evidence of the State was wholly insufficient to support the allegations of the information and we are reversing the case as to Hisel, it necessarily follows that the same order would be made for the defendant Litton.

The judgment of the District Court of Oklahoma County as to the defendant Charles A. Litton is reversed.

POWELL, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 164 (Friday, August 23, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 52457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20699]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Chapter 2

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Appendix A, 
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, Part 1--Charter

CFR Correction

0
In Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 2 (Parts 201 to 
299), revised as of October 1, 2012, on page 573, in Appendix A to 
Chapter 2, add two lines to the list immediately preceding Part 1--
Charter to read as follows:

Appendix A to Chapter 2--Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

* * * * *

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

* * * * *
    Revised 27 June 2000.
    Revised 14 May 2007.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-20699 Filed 8-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
<page>

Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form, 10-Q/A-1 (the "Report") of
Amaru, Inc. (the "Company"), for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Colin Binny,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company



/s/ Colin Binny
----------------------------------
President, Chief Executive Officer
April 30, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4619 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4619

  To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to provide 
   temporary relief from the annual fee imposed on health insurance 
 providers, to the extent that such fee is due to Puerto Rican health 
                               insurance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 12, 2017

 Mr. Curbelo of Florida (for himself, Mrs. Murphy of Florida, and Miss 
Gonzalez-Colon of Puerto Rico) introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the 
   Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to provide 
   temporary relief from the annual fee imposed on health insurance 
 providers, to the extent that such fee is due to Puerto Rican health 
                               insurance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY RELIEF FROM ANNUAL FEE ON HEALTH INSURANCE 
              PROVIDERS IN PUERTO RICO.

    (a) In General.--Section 9010 of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(k) Temporary Relief for Puerto Rico.--For calendar years 2018 
and 2019, the fee described in subsection (a)(1) for a covered entity 
shall be reduced by the portion of such fee that such entity 
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Secretary of the Treasury is 
the portion attributable to net premiums written for health insurance 
regulated by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Paragraph (1) of section 9010(b) of the 
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is amended by striking ``the 
fee under this section'' and inserting ``the amount determined under 
this subsection''.
                                 <all>
```