alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009180EN.01004803.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/48

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 11 June 2009 — ERNI Electronics v OHIM (Maxibridge)

(Case T-132/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark MaxiBridge - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness of the function of the goods indicated in the trade mark application - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009))

2009/C 180/90

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ERNI Electronics GmbH (Adelberg, Germany) (represented by: N. Breitenbach and W. Schaller, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 January 2008 (Case R 1530/2006-4) regarding the registration of the word sign Maxibridge as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders ERNI Electronics GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ERNI Electronics GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 142 of 7.6.2008

1

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51692 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. FRANCISCO MENDOZA, JR Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-1959-ALL
Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Francisco Mendoza, Jr. has appealed the district court’s order revoking his supervised release imposed as part of his sentence for his 2004 conviction of possession with intent to distribute marijuana. Mendoza contends that the evidence showing that he violated a condition of his supervised release by committing a new law violation was insufficient. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D August 19, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 06-51692

2 In United States v. Mendoza, 522 F.3d 482, 488-90 (5th Cir.), petition for cert. filed (July 21, 2008) (No. 08-5446), we held that the evidence of Mendoza’s guilt ofthe new lawviolation was sufficient. As Mendoza concedes, our holding in that case provides a sufficient basis for affirming the district court’s order in the instant appeal. In Mendoza, the Government bore the burden in that proceeding of proving Mendoza’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. See id. at 488. In this revocation proceeding, the Government bore the burden of proving the new law violation by a preponderance ofthe evidence only. See United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 117-18 (5th Cir. 2005)

. E ven if Mendoza prevails in his petition for a writ of certiorari, Mendoza cannot show, in light of the evi dence summarized in our prior opinion, that the district court abused its discretion in determining that the Government had shown by a preponderance of the evidence that Mendoza had violated a condition of his supervised release by committing
a new lawviolation. See Mendoza, 522 F.3d at 486-88; see also United States v. McCormick, 54 F. 3d 214, 219 (5th Cir. 1995). The district court’s order is AFFIRMED.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4440 

To require the Secretary of Energy to retain and redistribute certain amounts 

collected as fines. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2017 

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Energy to retain and redistribute 

certain amounts collected as fines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Redistribution of Fines 

5 to Our Communities Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. USE OF FUNDS. 

7 The Secretary of Energy shall retain amounts col8 lected for safety-related fines pursuant to section 234A of 

9 the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2282a), and 

10 shall distribute the portion of those amounts that the SecVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:41 Nov 22, 2017 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4440.IH H4440

rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4440 IH

1 retary determines appropriate to local governments to 

2 mitigate any economic impacts in connection with the clo3 sure of the nuclear facility with respect to which the fines 

4 were collected. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TYLER KLINE,

 Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-14-00005-CR

Appeal from the

384th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20120D04322)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Tyler Kline, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. Rule 42.2(a) permits an 

appellate court to dismiss a criminal appeal on the appellant’s motion at any time before the 

appellate court’s decision. TEX.R.APP.P. 42.2(a). Because the Appellant has complied with the 

requirements of Rule 42.2(a), we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

February 19, 2014

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
# Pike - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Pikeville, KY: New Wastewater Technology Supports a Growth Mindset  Building Appalachia’s infrastructure has been an ARC investment priority for 58 years, especially the development and maintenance of&#160;basic infrastructure systems for water, sewer, energy, and stormwater. ARC’s Area Development Program invested $66.8 million in water and sewer projects alone in Fiscal Year 2022. When thinking about economic growth, however, it can be difficult to connect these [&#8230;]The post Pikeville, KY: New Wastewater Technology Supports a Growth Mindset  appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Big Sandy Area Development District Executive Director Eric Ratliff Email e&#114;&#105;&#99;&#x2e;&#x72;&#x61;tl&#105;&#102;&#x66;&#x40;&#x42;&#x69;gS&#97;&#110;&#x64;&#x79;&#x2e;&#x6f;r&#103;The post Big Sandy Area Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
EXHIBIT 21

NB&T FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

At December 31, 2006



|                                    |  |                        |  |                        |  
|----------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ---------------------- | -
|NAME OF CORPORATION                 |  | STATE OF INCORPORATION |  | PERCENTAGE OFOWNERSHIP |  
|The National Bank and Trust Company |  | Ohio                   |  | 100                    | %
|NB&T Insurance Agency Group, Inc.   |  | Ohio                   |  | 100                    | %
|NB&T Insurance Agency, Inc.         |  | Ohio                   |  | 100                    | %
|NB&T Statutory Trust I              |  | Ohio                   |  | 100                    | %



62
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           20946
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                261096
<PP&E>                                        12307722
<DEPRECIATION>                                   45533
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                12544671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9312840
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    9492831
<COMMON>                                      19422457
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  12544671
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3845433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2035157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              376346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (5489717)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (5489717)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (7550589)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (13040306)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.50)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2008260EN.01001602.xml

| 11.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/16

---

Action brought on 11 August 2008 — REWE-Zentral v OHIM — Grupo Corporativo Teype (Solfrutta)

(Case T-331/08)

(2008/C 260/30)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: REWE-Zentral AG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: A. Bognár and M. Kinkeldey, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Grupo Corporativo Teype, SL (Madrid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 May 2008 in case R 1679/2007-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 May 2008 in case R 1679/2007-2; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘Solfrutta’ for goods in classes 29, 30 and 32

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: Community trade mark registration No 1 687 722 of the word mark ‘FRUTISOL’ for goods in class 32; Spanish trade mark registration No 2 018 327 of the word mark ‘FRUTISOL’ for goods in class 32

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition partially

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal erred in not taking into account the alleged weak distinctiveness of the earlier trade marks. Likewise, when assessing only the similarity of the single elements of the trade marks concerned, the Board of Appeal did not sufficiently take into account that the most relevant aspect in the framework of such assessment is the overall impression conveyed by the trade marks concerned.

Pleas in law:

---
**Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 July 2009 – Commission v Greece**

**(Case C‐465/08)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2005/36/EC – Right of establishment – Recognition of professional qualifications – Failure to adopt within the prescribed period

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 11)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22), which repeals Directive 89/49/EEC (OJ 1989 L 19, p. 16). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 28449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12023]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement 
(BOEMRE)

Notice on Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Lease Sales

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, 
Interior.

ACTION: List of restricted joint bidders.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the Bureau 
of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement by the joint 
bidding provisions of 30 CFR 256.41, each entity within one of the 
following groups shall be restricted from bidding with any entity in 
any other of the following groups at Outer Continental Shelf oil and 
gas lease sales to be held during the bidding period May 1, 2011, 
through October 31, 2011. The List of Restricted Joint Bidders 
published in the Federal Register on January 24, 2011, covered the 
period November 1, 2010, through April 30, 2011.

Group I.
    Exxon Mobil Corporation,
    ExxonMobil Exploration Company.
Group II.
    Shell Oil Company,
    Shell Offshore Inc.,
    SWEPI LP,
    Shell Frontier Oil & Gas Inc.,
    SOI Finance Inc.,
    Shell Gulf of Mexico Inc.
Group III.
    BP America Production Company,
    BP Exploration & Production Inc.,
    BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.,
Group IV.
    Chevron Corporation,
    Chevron U.S.A. Inc.,
    Chevron Midcontinent, L.P.,
    Unocal Corporation,
    Union Oil Company of California,
    Pure Partners, L.P.
Group V.
    ConocoPhillips Company,
    ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc.,
    Phillips Pt. Arguello Production Company,
    Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company LP,
    Burlington Resources Offshore Inc.,
    The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company,
    Inexeco Oil Company.
Group VI.
    Eni Petroleum Co. Inc.,
    Eni Petroleum US LLC,
    Eni Oil US LLC,
    Eni Marketing Inc.,
    Eni BB Petroleum Inc.,
    Eni US Operating Co. Inc.,
    Eni BB Pipeline LLC.
Group VII.
    Petrobras America Inc.,
    Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.
Group VIII.
    Statoil ASA,
    Statoil Gulf of Mexico LLC,
    Statoil USA E&P Inc.,
    Statoil Gulf Properties Inc.
Group IX.
    Total E&P, Inc.

    Dated: April 27, 2011.
Michael R. Bromwich,
Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and 
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011-12023 Filed 5-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Gregory J. Owens, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge Manugistics Group, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended February 29, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Manugistics Group, Inc. Dated: May 13, 2004
    By:
    /s/ Gregory J. OwensGregory J. OwensChairman and Chief Executive Officer

Principal Executive Officer This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of Manugistics Group, Inc. under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective
of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Manugistics
Group, Inc. and will be retained by Manugistics Group, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
# C_2009180EN.01004802.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/48

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 11 June 2009 — Baldesberger v OHIM (Shape of tweezers)

(Case T-78/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark - Shape of tweezers - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2009/C 180/89

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fides B. Baldesberger (represented by: F. Nielsen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Kicia, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 December 2007 (Case R 1405/2007-4) regarding an application for registration of a three-dimensional sign in the shape of tweezers as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Fides B. Baldesberger to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Fides B. Baldesberger to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 107 of 26.4.2008.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Connections Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






Date: May 14, 2010By:
/s/ Brian NeillBrian NeillChief Financial Officer
# Bath - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Gateway Area Development District Executive Director Joshua Farrow Email &#106;&#x6f;&#115;&#x68;u&#x61;&#46;&#102;&#x61;&#114;&#x72;o&#x77;&#64;&#107;&#x79;&#46;&#x67;o&#x76;The post Gateway Area Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Exhibit 32.1

I, Craig H. Barratt, the chief executive officer of Atheros Communications, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code
that, to my knowledge,:



|(i) | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 19, 2009



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Craig H. Barratt                 
|Craig H. Barratt                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)