Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2023 / Notices 88869 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

7060 (February 2, 2023) (Initiation Notice). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Multilayered Wood 

Flooring from the People’s Republic of China; 

2021–2022,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

3See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of Amended 

Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less 

than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 76 

FR 76690 (December 8, 2011), as amended in 

Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People’s 

Republic of China, 77 FR 5484 (February 3, 2012) 

(collectively, Order). 

(3) To approve the powerline and 

associated access roads and issue a 

special use permit with terms and 

conditions; and 

(4) If needed, to approve a forest plan 

amendment that may provide 

management direction for coal leasing 

on 3,077 acres within the ONF. 

The FS decision on suitability, 

consent with surface leasing 

stipulations, the powerline and access 

roads special use permit, and a forest 

plan amendment (if needed) would be 

documented in a Record of Decision 

issued by the FS. Consent to the BLM 

would be issued through 

correspondence. 

Substantive Provisions 

The FS’s Land Management Planning 

Rule at 36 CFR 219.13(b)(2) requires the 

responsible official to provide notice of 

which substantive requirements of 36 

CFR 219.8 through 219.11 are likely to 

be directly related to the amendment. 

Whether a rule provision is directly 

related to an amendment is determined 

by the purpose for the amendment and 

the effects (beneficial or adverse) of the 

amendment, and is informed by the best 

available scientific information, 

scoping, effects analysis, monitoring 

data or other rationale (36 CFR 

219.13(b)(5)). Based on those criteria, 

the Planning Rule provision likely to be 

directly related to the forest plan 

amendment (if needed) is: § 219.10(a)(2) 

(multiple use). 

Additional Information 

The EIS will identify, analyze, and 

consider mitigation to address the 

reasonably foreseeable impacts to 

surface resources from the LBA, the 

electrical powerline, and the associated 

access roads. In accordance with 40 CFR 

1502.14(e), the agencies will evaluate 

appropriate mitigation measures not 

already included in the LBA. Mitigation 

may include avoidance, minimization, 

rectification, reduction or elimination 

over time, and compensation; and may 

be considered at multiple scales, 

including the landscape scale. The 

agencies will utilize and coordinate the 

National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA) and land use planning processes 

to help support compliance with 

applicable procedural requirements 

under the Endangered Species Act (16 

U.S.C. 1536) and section 106 of the 

National Historic Preservation Act (54 

U.S.C. 306108) as provided in 36 CFR 

800.2(d)(3), including public 

involvement requirements of section 

106. The information about historic and 

cultural resources and threatened and 

endangered species within the area 

potentially affected by the LBA and 

proposed plan amendment will assist 

the agencies in identifying and 

evaluating impacts to such resources. 

Indian Tribal Nations will be 

consulted on a government-togovernment basis in accordance with 

Executive Order 13175, BLM MS 1780, 

and other Departmental policies. Tribal 

concerns, including impacts on Indian 

trust assets and potential impacts to 

cultural resources, will be given due 

consideration. Federal, state, and local 

agencies, along with Indian Tribal 

Nations and other stakeholders that may 

be interested in or affected by the 

proposed Federal coal LBA for the 

Heavener project, the amendment to the 

ONF Revised Forest Plan, and 

powerline-associated actions. They are 

invited to participate in the scoping 

process and, if eligible, may request or 

be requested by the agencies to 

participate in the development of the 

EIS as a cooperating agency. 

Additional opportunities for 

government-to-government consultation 

will be provided during the NEPA 

process. 

Dated: December 19, 2023. 

Gregory Smith, 

Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest 

System. 

[FR Doc. 2023–28300 Filed 12–22–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3411–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–970] 

Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, Preliminary Determination of 

No Shipments, and Rescission of 

Review, in Part; 2021–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

determines that Jiangsu Senmao 

Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

(Senmao) did not make sales of subject 

merchandise at less than normal value 

(NV), and that certain companies had no 

shipments of subject merchandise 

during the period of review (POR) 

December 1, 2021, through November 

30, 2022. In addition, we are rescinding 

the review with respect to one company. 

We invite interested parties to comment 

on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable December 26, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rebecca Trainor, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VIII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; phone: 

(202) 482–4007. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on multilayered 

wood flooring (MLWF) from the 

People’s Republic of China (China).1

The review covers 48 companies, 

including mandatory respondent, 

Senmao. 

For events that occurred since the 

Initiation Notice and the analysis 

behind our preliminary results herein, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.2 The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list of 

topics discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is included as 

Appendix I to this notice. 

Scope of the Order 3

The product covered by the Order is 

MLWF from China. For a complete 

description of the scope of this 

administrative review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Partial Rescission of Review 

On May 1, 2023, Kahrs International 

Inc. (Kahrs) timely withdrew its request 

for review of the Fusong Jinlong Group 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
88870 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2023 / Notices 

4See Kahrs’ Letter, ‘‘Notice of Withdrawal of 

Request for 2021–2022 Administrative Review,’’ 

dated May 1, 2023. 

5 Jinlong consists of the following companies: 

Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group Co., Ltd.; Fusong 

Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.; Dalian Qianqiu 

Wooden Product Co., Ltd.; and Fusong Jinqiu 

Wooden Product Co., Ltd. 

6See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). 

7See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011); see also the 

‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section, below. 

8See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at the 

‘‘Separate Rate Determinations’’ section for more 

details. 

9See Memorandum, ‘‘Preliminary Results Margin 

Calculation for Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood 

Industry Co., Assessment Ltd.,’’ dated concurrently 

with this notice. 

10See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

11See Initiation Notice (‘‘All firms listed below 

that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the 

administrative reviews involving NME countries 

must complete, as appropriate, either a separate rate 

application or certification, as described below.’’). 

Companies that are subject to this administrative 

review that are considered to be part of the Chinawide entity are listed in Appendix II. 

12See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

13See also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing 

requirements). 

14See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative 

Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 

88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (APO and 

Service Final Rule). 

15See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

16We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an 

argument that Commerce would normally address 

in a comment of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

(Jinlong).4 No other parties requested a 

review of this company.5 Accordingly, 

Commerce is rescinding the 

administrative review with respect to 

Jinlong.6

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

Based on an analysis of information 

from U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP), no shipment 

certifications, and other record 

information, we preliminarily determine 

that 23 companies had no shipments of 

subject merchandise during the POR. 

For a listing of these companies, see 

Appendix II of this notice. Consistent 

with our practice in non-market 

economy (NME) cases, we are not 

rescinding this review with respect to 

these companies but, rather, intend to 

complete the review and issue 

appropriate instructions to CBP based 

on the final results of the review.7

Separate Rates 

We preliminarily determine that, in 

addition to Senmao, two companies not 

individually-examined are eligible for 

separate rates in this administrative 

review, Dalian Deerfu Wooden Product 

Co., Ltd. (Deerfu) and Dalian Jaenmaken 

Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (Jaenmaken).8

The Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act), and Commerce’s regulations do 

not address the establishment of a 

separate rate to be applied to companies 

not selected for individual examination 

when Commerce limits its examination 

in an administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for separate-rate 

respondents which Commerce did not 

examine individually in an 

administrative review. For the 

preliminary results of this review, 

Commerce has determined the 

estimated dumping margin for Senmao 

to be zero.9 For the reasons explained in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, 

we are assigning this rate to Deerfu and 

Jaenmaken, i.e., the non-examined 

respondents which qualify for a separate 

rate in this review. 

The China-Wide Entity 

Commerce’s policy regarding 

conditional review of the China-wide 

entity applies to this administrative 

review.10 Under this policy, the Chinawide entity will not be under review 

unless a party specifically requests, or 

Commerce self-initiates, a review of the 

entity. Because no party requested a 

review of the China-wide entity, the 

entity is not under review, and the 

entity’s rate (i.e., 85.13 percent) is not 

subject to change. See the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum for further 

discussion. 

Aside from the companies for which 

we preliminarily find no shipments and 

the company for which the review is 

being rescinded, Commerce considers 

all other companies for which a review 

was requested and did not demonstrate 

separate rate eligibility to be part of the 

China-wide entity.11 For the 

preliminary results of this review, we 

consider 21 companies to be part of the 

China-wide entity. For a listing of these 

companies, see Appendix II of this 

notice. 

Methodology 

We are conducting this administrative 

review in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213. We calculated export prices for 

Senmao in accordance with section 

772(a) of the Act. Because China is an 

NME country within the meaning of 

section 771(18) of the Act, we calculated 

NV in accordance with section 773(c) of 

the Act. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily determine that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the POR December 1, 

2021, through November 30, 2022: 

Exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo 

and Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. .................................... 00.00 

Dalian Deerfu Wooden Product Co., Ltd. ...................... 00.00 

Dalian Jaenmaken Wood Industry Co., Ltd. ................. 00.00 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed for these preliminary results 

to interested parties with an 

Administrative Protective Order within 

five days after the date of publication of 

these preliminary results.12

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), 

interested parties may submit case briefs 

no later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.13 Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, may be filed not later than 

five days after the date for filing case 

briefs.14 Interested parties who submit 

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding must submit: (1) a table of 

contents listing each issue; and (2) a 

table of authorities.15 As provided under 

19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 

proceedings we have encouraged 

interested parties to provide an 

executive summary of their brief that 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes. In this 

administrative review, we instead 

request that interested parties provide at 

the beginning of their briefs a public, 

executive summary for each issue raised 

in their briefs.16 Further, we request that 

interested parties limit their executive 

summary of each issue to no more than 

450 words, not including citations. We 

intend to use the executive summaries 

as the basis of the comment summaries 

included in the issues and decision 

memorandum that will accompany the 

final results in this administrative 

review. We request that interested 

parties include footnotes for relevant 

citations in the executive summary of 

each issue. Note that Commerce has 

amended certain of its requirements 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2023 / Notices 88871 

17See APO and Service Final Rule. 

18See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

19 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied 

the assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

20See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

21See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Final Determination of No Shipments; 2016–2017, 

84 FR 38002 (August 5, 2019). 

22See Appendix II for a list of these companies. 

23See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694, 65695 (October 24, 2011). 

pertaining to the service of documents 

in 19 CFR 351.303(f).17

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) 

the party’s name, address, and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of the issues 

to be discussed. Issues raised in the 

hearing will be limited to those raised 

in the respective case briefs. An 

electronically-filed hearing request must 

be received successfully in its entirety 

by Commerce’s electronic system, 

ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within 

30 days after the date of publication of 

this notice.18

Final Results 

Unless the deadline is extended, we 

intend to issue the final results of this 

administrative review, which will 

include the results of our analysis of the 

issues raised in the case briefs, within 

120 days of publication of these 

preliminary results in the Federal 

Register, pursuant to section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h). 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, 

Commerce will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b). 

If Senmao’s ad valorem weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or 

de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) 

in the final results of this review, 

Commerce will calculate importerspecific assessment rates on the basis of 

the ratio of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the importer’s examined 

sales and the total quantity of those 

sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).19 Commerce will also 

calculate (estimated) ad valorem 

importer-specific assessment rates with 

which to assess whether the per-unit 

assessment rate is de minimis. We will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review when the importerspecific ad valorem assessment rate 

calculated in the final results of this 

review is not zero or de minimis. 

For Deerfu and Jaenmaken, i.e., the 

respondents that were not selected for 

individual examination in this 

administrative review that qualified for 

a separate rate, the assessment rate will 

be the separate rate established in the 

final results of this administrative 

review. If, in the final results, the 

respondents’ weighted-average dumping 

margins continue to be zero or de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), 

Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 

the appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.20

For entries that were not reported in 

the U.S. sales databases submitted by 

Senmao during this review, and for the 

21 companies that do not qualify for a 

separate rate, Commerce will instruct 

CBP to liquidate such entries at the 

China-wide rate (i.e., 85.13 percent).21

In addition, if we continue to find no 

shipments of subject merchandise for 

the 23 companies for which we 

preliminarily find no such shipments 

during the POR,22 any suspended 

entries of subject merchandise 

associated with those companies will be 

liquidated at the China-wide rate.23

For Jinlong, i.e., the company for 

which the administrative review is 

rescinded, antidumping duties shall be 

assessed at a rate equal to the cash 

deposit of estimated antidumping duties 

required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). 

We intend to issue appropriate 

assessment instructions with respect to 

Jinlong, i.e., the company for which this 

administrative review is rescinded, to 

CBP 35 days after the publication of the 

preliminary results in the Federal 

Register. For all other companies that 

continue to be subject to review, we 

intend to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP 35 days after the 

publication of the final results in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

review for all shipments of the subject 

merchandise from China entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for the 

companies listed above that have a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate established in the final 

results of this review (except, if the rate 

is de minimis, then a cash deposit rate 

of zero will be required); (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters for 

which a review was not requested and 

that received a separate rate in a prior 

segment of this proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all 

Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be the rate for the 

China-wide entity (i.e., 85.13 percent); 

and (4) for all non-Chinese exporters of 

subject merchandise that have not 

received their own rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to 

Chinese exporter that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping and/ 

or countervailing duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties, and/or increase in 

the amount of antidumping duties by 

the amount of the countervailing duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing the 

preliminary results of this review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and 

777(i)(l) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4). 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
88872 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2023 / Notices 

1See Regulations to Improve Administration and 

Enforcement of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Laws, 86 FR 52300, 52316 (September 20, 

2021) (Final Rule) (‘‘It is our expectation that the 

Federal Register list will include, where 

appropriate, for each scope application the 

following data: (1) identification of the AD and/or 

CVD orders at issue; (2) a concise public summary 

of the product’s description, including the physical 

characteristics (including chemical, dimensional 

and technical characteristics) of the product; (3) the 

country(ies) where the product is produced and the 

country from where the product is exported; (4) the 

full name of the applicant; and (5) the date that the 

scope application was filed with Commerce.’’) 

2The retail display shelves are made of steel 

components welded together. The shelves are not 

designed to provide structural support to the 

gondola or wall brackets and lacks vertical uprights 

and horizontal supports necessary to install the 

headphone/speaker shelves. While shelf quantities, 

shelf sizes, and display accessories included with 

headphone/speaker retail display shelves can vary 

to meet the retail customer’s specifications, the 

custom designed, made to order headphone/speaker 

retail display shelves do not contain vertical or 

horizontal supports that lock together to form a 

frame, and are not designed to be placed on the 

floor/ground. The shelves lack a base. Once the 

headphone/speaker retail display shelves are 

assembled, they are hung on the retail customer’s 

existing slotted steel vertical supports of a gondola 

or wall brackets. Steel/pegboard gondola units upon 

which the headphone/speaker retail display shelves 

may be installed, are not included in the Fasteners 

for Retail dba siffron’s (siffron) product. The 

country of production is China. It is classified 

under HTSUS heading 9403, HTSUS subheading 

9403.20.0086. 

3This product covered by this request is a light 

truck spare tire with a 265/70R17 size designation, 

a ‘‘temporary use only’’ molding on the sidewall, 

and a tread depth no greater than 6.2 mm. The 

product does not have a Uniform Tire Quality 

Grade Standard rating molded on the sidewall. 

Dated: December 19, 2023. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Period of Review 

IV. Scope of the Order 

V. Selection of Respondents 

VI. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

VII. Discussion of the Methodology 

VIII. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

No Shipments 

Anhui Longhua Bamboo Product Co., Ltd. 

Benxi Flooring Factory (General Partnership) 

Dalian Shengyu Science and Technology 

Development Co., Ltd. 

Dongtai Fuan Universal Dynamics, LLC 

Dun Hua Sen Tai Wood Co., Ltd. 

Dunhua City Dexin Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

Dunhua Shengda Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

HaiLin LinJing Wooden Products Co., Ltd. 

Hunchun Xingjia Wooden Flooring Inc. 

Huzhou Sunergy World Trade Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Keri Wood Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Mingle Flooring Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Simba Flooring Co., Ltd. 

Jiashan On-Line Lumber Co., Ltd. 

Kingman Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

Linyi Youyou Wood Co., Ltd. 

Pinge Timber Manufacturing (Zhejiang) Co., 

Ltd. 

Power Dekor Group Co., Ltd. 

Sino-Maple (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. 

Suzhou Dongda Wood Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Dadongwu Greenhome Wood Co., 

Ltd. 

Zhejiang Longsen Lumbering Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Shiyou Timber Co., Ltd. 

China-Wide Entity 

Benxi Wood Company 

Dalian Jiahong Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Penghong Floor Products Co., Ltd./ 

Dalian Shumaike Floor Manufacturing Co., 

Ltd. 

Dunhua City Hongyuan Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

Huzhou Chenghang Wood Co., Ltd. 

Huzhou Fulinmen Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Guyu International Trading Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Yuhui International Trade Co., Ltd. 

Jiashan HuiJiaLe Decoration Material Co., 

Ltd. 

Jiaxing Hengtong Wood Co., Ltd. 

Lauzon Distinctive Hardwood Flooring, Inc. 

Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd. 

Metropolitan Hardwood Floors, Inc. 

Muchsee Wood (Chuzhou) Co., Ltd. 

Tongxiang Jisheng Import and Export Co., 

Ltd. 

Yekalon Industry Inc. 

Yihua Lifestyle Technology Co., Ltd. 

(successor-in-interest to Guangdong Yihua 

Timber Industry Co., Ltd.) 

Yingyi-Nature (Kunshan) Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

Zhejiang Fuerjia Wooden Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Shuimojiangnan New Material 

Technology Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Simite Wooden Co., Ltd. 

Rescissions 

Dalian Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd., 

Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group Co., Ltd., 

Fusong Jinqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd., 

and Fusong Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., 

Ltd. (collectively, Fusong Jinlong Group) 

[FR Doc. 2023–28417 Filed 12–22–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Notice of Scope Ruling Applications 

Filed in Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) received scope 

ruling applications, requesting that 

scope inquiries be conducted to 

determine whether identified products 

are covered by the scope of antidumping 

duty (AD) and/or countervailing duty 

(CVD) orders and that Commerce issue 

scope rulings pursuant to those 

inquiries. In accordance with 

Commerce’s regulations, we are 

notifying the public of the filing of the 

scope ruling applications listed below 

in the month of November 2023. 

DATES: Applicable December 26, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Terri Monroe, AD/CVD Operations, 

Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: 

(202) 482–1384. 

Notice of Scope Ruling Applications 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.225(d)(3), we are notifying the 

public of the following scope ruling 

applications related to AD and CVD 

orders and findings filed in or around 

the month of November 2023. This 

notification includes, for each scope 

application: (1) identification of the AD 

and/or CVD orders at issue (19 CFR 

351.225(c)(1)); (2) concise public 

descriptions of the products at issue, 

including the physical characteristics 

(including chemical, dimensional and 

technical characteristics) of the products 

(19 CFR 351.225(c)(2)(ii)); (3) the 

countries where the products are 

produced and the countries from where 

the products are exported (19 CFR 

351.225(c)(2)(i)(B)); (4) the full names of 

the applicants; and (5) the dates that the 

scope applications were filed with 

Commerce and the name of the ACCESS 

scope segment where the scope 

applications can be found.1 This notice 

does not include applications which 

have been rejected and not properly 

resubmitted. The scope ruling 

applications listed below are available 

on Commerce’s online e-filing and 

document management system, 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS), at 

https://access.trade.gov. 

Scope Ruling Applications 

Boltless Steel Shelving Units 

Prepackaged for Sale from the People’s 

Republic of China (China) (A–570–018); 

headphone/speaker retail display 

shelves (Retail Display Shelves); 2

produced in and exported from China; 

submitted by Fasteners for Retail, Inc. 

dba siffron. (siffron); November 8, 2023; 

ACCESS scope segment ‘‘siffron Retail 

Display Shelves.’’ 

Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck 

Tires from Taiwan (A–583–869); Certain 

Light Truck Spare Tires (LTST); 3

produced in and exported from Taiwan; 

submitted by Cheng Shin Rubber Ind. 

Co. Ltd. (Cheng Shin); November 13, 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES