alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Richard T. Sperberg,
Chief Executive Officer, certify that:





|1. |  | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Onsite Energy Corporation;
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|3. |  | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Date:  October 14, 2002



By:

/s/    RICHARD T. SPERBERGRichard T. Sperberg Chief Executive
Officer Principal Executive Officer
================================================================================

                                  Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Spirit,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
         material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of
         operations of the Company.



Date:  May 12, 2006

                                               /s/ Peter Sotola
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Peter Sotola
                                              President, C.E.O. and Director
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2008285EN.01005501.xml

| 8.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/55

---

Action brought on 30 July 2008 — Kipp v Europol

(Case F-65/08)

(2008/C 285/98)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Michael Kipp (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: P. de Casparis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of 4 October 2007 by which Europol informed the applicant that there was no possibility of offering him a permanent post

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 4 October 2007 by which the defendant informed the applicant that there was no possibility of offering him a permanent post, the decision of 29 April 2008 rejecting the complaint against the earlier decision and the decision of 12 June 2008, which follows on from that of 4 October 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 4 October 2007 by which the defendant informed the applicant that there was no possibility of offering him a permanent post, the decision of 29 April 2008 rejecting the complaint against the earlier decision and the decision of 12 June 2008, which follows on from that of 4 October 2007;

| — | Order Europol to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order Europol to pay the costs.

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1499]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           REMEMBERING THE LIFE OF MILAGROS ``MILLIE'' MUNOZ

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN

                               of florida

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 12, 2012

  Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN. Mr. Speaker, it is with great sadness that I bring 
news to the U.S. Congress that, last month, on Monday, August 6, the 
South Florida community and the Munoz family lost a courageous and 
strong woman: Milagros ``Millie'' Munoz.
  I have twice previously come to the floor to speak of Millie, and the 
debilitating disorder from which she suffered: Dystonia. Millie was a 
remarkable woman described by all who knew her as ``the sweetest 
person,'' who was strong even in the face of the inescapable pains of 
dystonia. Through all of it--her pain; her rigorous physical therapy 
sessions--Millie always greeted everyone with that warm, unmistakable 
smile of hers.
  As a Member of Congress, it is my duty to help call attention to, and 
raise awareness of disorders such as dystonia to the American public. 
Together we can work together and call for additional research, with 
the hope that one day a cure may be found.
  Right now, dystonia is a virtually unknown condition that stems from 
major neurological diseases. It causes the involuntary spasm and 
contraction of muscles that robs those affected of the freedom to move. 
The condition is often misdiagnosed; Millie herself was often told by 
doctors that ``it was all in her head.'' It was only until her friend 
and doctor, Cynthia Gonzalez, astutely recognized Millie's symptoms as 
dystonia, that her mind could be put at ease.
  Millie's case stands as an example of why more Americans should be 
aware of dystonia; so that more can be done to prevent it and others 
like Millie don't have to suffer unnecessarily in the future. People 
should know her story so that Millie's courage in the face of adversity 
does not get forgotten.
  Millie may be gone, but her courage and resilience will be her 
lasting legacy. All of our hearts are a little heavier this week in 
South Florida as we honor and remember Milagros ``Millie'' Munoz. We 
should not mourn the loss of a life, but rather celebrate the memory of 
a life lived.
  Mr. Speaker, her passing is not the end, but the beginning of a new 
future; a future where others need not suffer from disorders like 
dystonia. And we here in Congress can help facilitate that future.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFCIER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly Report of TheraBiogen, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, Kelly T. Hickel, Chief Executive Officer and Robert Hipple, Manager of
CF Consulting, LLC, principal financial officer, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

December 5, 2008

/s/ Kelly T. Hickel
--------------------------------------
Kelly T. Hickel
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Robert Hipple
--------------------------------------
Robert Hipple, Manager
CF Consulting, LLC
Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Media Group Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gregory Fish, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.

/S/ GREGORY FISH
-----------------------
Gregory Fish
Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 15, 2006






                                       22
# C_2008116EN.01003402.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/34

---

Action brought on 22 February 2008 — Valero Jordana v Commission

(Case F-25/08)

(2008/C 116/66)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Gregorio Valero Jordana (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. van der Woude, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of 17 April 2007 inasmuch as does not award the applicant any additional priority points for the promotion year 2003.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 17 April 2007 inasmuch as does not award the applicant any additional priority points for the promotion year 2003 |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 17 April 2007 inasmuch as does not award the applicant any additional priority points for the promotion year 2003

| — | Order the defendant to pay damages of EUR 5 000; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay damages of EUR 5 000;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.25 
  
 ITC^DeltaCom, Inc. 
  
 Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation 
  
 Non-employee directors of ITC^DeltaCom, Inc. (the “Company”) receive cash and receive equity-based fees pursuant to the ITC^DeltaCom,
Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”). 
  
 The Company’s current policy is to pay each non-employee director an annual fee for service on the board of directors of $30,000 in cash and, subject to review at least annually, restricted stock units
representing 2,000 shares of common stock, which vest with respect to one third of the shares subject to such awards on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant. The chairman of the audit committee also receives an annual fee of
$5,000. 
  
 Each non-employee director receives fees of $1,000 for
each board meeting attended in person, $500 for each board meeting attended by conference telephone and $500 for each committee meeting, whether in person or by teleconference. 
  
 The Company’s current policy is to grant non-employee directors options to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock
pursuant to the Stock Incentive Plan upon their initial appointment to the board of directors. The exercise price per share under each option granted to a non-employee director upon appointment is the fair market value of the common stock on the
option grant date. Each such option awarded pursuant to this policy vests with respect to one third of the shares subject to such option on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant. No option is exercisable more than ten years
after the option grant date. Upon the termination of a non-employee director’s service for any reason (other than for cause), any options granted to the director will vest, and the director will have the right, at any time within a specified
period after the date of termination of service and prior to termination of the options, to exercise any options held by the director on the service termination date.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel T. Botelho, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that, because he was acquitted of forging an instrument, the verdict finding him guilty of possessing that instrument is against the weight of the evidence. Upon our review of the evidence, we find that the trier of fact gave the evidence the weight it should be accorded *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J.— Criminal Possession Forged Instrument, 2nd Degree.) Present —Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
**Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 November 2009 – SLG Carbon v Commission**

**(Case C-564/08 P)**

Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices − Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Market for electrical and mechanical carbon and graphite products − Article 15(2) of Regulation No 17 – Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Turnover and share of the relevant market – Value of ‘captive’ use – Principle of equal treatment – Principle of proportionality

1.                     *Appeals – Grounds – Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal – Inadmissibility – Appeal against a judgment
of the Court of First Instance in the sphere of competition (see paras 22-23, 25, 31)*

2.                     *Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Turnover taken into account – Value of deliveries internal to the undertaking
– Included (Council Regulation No 17, Art. 15(2) (see para. 30)*

3.                     *Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Division of the undertakings in question into categories with a specific starting
point – Whether permissible (Council Regulation No 17, Art. 15(2); Commission notice 98/C 9/03, point 1 A) (see paras 43,
45, 49, 56)*

4.                     *Appeals – Jurisdiction of the Court – Challenge on grounds of fairness to the Court of First Instance’s assessment concerning
the amount of a fine imposed on an undertaking – Excluded – Review limited to ascertaining whether the General Court took
into account all the factors essential to the assessment of the gravity of the infringement and all the arguments raised against
the fine imposed (see paras 58-59)*

**Re:**

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 8 October 2008 in Case T-68/04 | SGL Carbon | v | Commission | , in which the Court of First Instance dismissed the application brought by the appellant for the annulment of Commission Decision 2004/420/EC of 3 December 2003 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement concerning an agreement in the market for electrical and mechanical carbon and graphite products or, in the alternative, an application for the reduction of the fine imposed on the appellant – Failure to take into consideration, by classifying it as a new and inadmissible complaint, the appellant’s argument concerning the taking into account of the value of the captive use in calculating the turnover and market shares of the undertakings concerned – Breach of the principles of proportionality and equal treatment. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the appeal; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders SGL Carbon AG to pay the costs. |
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors Timeline, Inc.:

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report included in this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A Amendment No. 1 of Timeline, Inc, into the previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-4386 and 333-2190) of Timeline, Inc.

| /s/  Williams   & Webster, P.S. |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |   |
| *Certified   Public Accountants*              |   |
| Spokane, Washington                           |   |
| October 20, 2005                              |   |
# C_2009006EN.01004601.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/46

---

Action brought on 6 November 2008 — Pleijte v Commission

(Case F-91/08)

(2009/C 6/93)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Johanna Gerdina Pleijte (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: P. Nelissen Grade, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Action for annulment of the decision of the appointing authority not to include the applicant's name on the provisional list of preselected officials in the context of the 2007 certification exercise and to subtract the length of a period of leave on personal grounds from the 10-year period which was taken into account in order to establish her length of service for the purposes of that certification procedure

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the appointing authority of 7 August 2008 rejecting the applicant's complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the appointing authority of 7 August 2008 rejecting the applicant's complaint;

| — | Annul the appointing authority's decision not to include the applicant's name on the provisional list of preselected officials in the context of the 2007 certification exercise; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the appointing authority's decision not to include the applicant's name on the provisional list of preselected officials in the context of the 2007 certification exercise;

| — | Add the applicant's name to the list of preselected officials in sufficient time to enable her to take part in the training programme provided for by Article 6 of the GIP; |
| --- | --- |

—

Add the applicant's name to the list of preselected officials in sufficient time to enable her to take part in the training programme provided for by Article 6 of the GIP;

| — | Amend the methodology in the administrative notice of 8 January 2008 adopted on the basis of Commission Decision C(2007) 5694 of 20 November 2007 on the general provisions for the implementation of Article 45a of the Staff Regulations as regards the part relating to the taking into account of experience within the institutions; |
| --- | --- |

—

Amend the methodology in the administrative notice of 8 January 2008 adopted on the basis of Commission Decision C(2007) 5694 of 20 November 2007 on the general provisions for the implementation of Article 45a of the Staff Regulations as regards the part relating to the taking into account of experience within the institutions;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 89488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28447]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12294]


Notice of Public Meeting: International Information and 
Communications Policy Division Stakeholder Briefing

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State Department will hold a public meeting at 2 p.m.-3:30 
p.m. (ET) on WebEx with the Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy's 
International Information and Communications Policy (CDP/ICP) division. 
The purpose of the meeting is to brief stakeholders on CDP/ICP's past 
and upcoming international engagements. These include engagement at the 
International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the Organization of 
American States Inter-American Telecommunication Commission (CITEL), 
the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the 
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Forum Telecommunications and 
Information Working Group, the Group of Seven (G7) Digital & Tech 
Working Group, the Group of Twenty (G20) Digital Economy Task Force, 
and other multilateral processes and bilateral digital and ICT 
dialogues.

DATES: The meeting will be on January 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact Daniel Oates, Global 
Technology Policy Advisor, CDP/ICP, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fab59b8e9f89beb7ba898e9b8e9fd49d958c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d321c09180e39303d0e091c0918531a120b">[email protected]</span></a> or 202-436-
5516.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information about the Bureau of 
Cyberspace and Digital Policy is accessible at https://www.state.gov/bureaus-offices/deputy-secretary-of-state/bureau-of-cyberspace-and-digital-policy/.
    We encourage anyone wanting to attend this virtual meeting to 
register using the following link by 5:00PM Tuesday, January 16: 
https://statedept.webex.com/weblink/register/r5293d97462276d4d02be7fb36b04879a.
    Requests for reasonable accommodation made after January 8 will be 
considered but might not be able to be accommodated. The public may 
have an opportunity to provide comments at this meeting.

Agenda

Thursday, January 18, at 2 p.m. (ET)

Opening Remarks
Briefings on CDP/ICP's past and upcoming activities
Public Comment
Adjournment

Stephan A. Lang,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, International Information and 
Communications Policy, Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-28447 Filed 12-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>