alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 INTERLINK ELECTRONICS, INC. 
 INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT 
 1996 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
  
 This INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT is made between INTERLINK ELECTRONICS,
INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and
                                 (the “Optionee”), pursuant to the
Company’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”). The Company and the Optionee agree as follows: 
  
 1. Option Grant: The Company hereby grants to the Optionee on the terms and conditions of this Agreement the right and the option (the
“Option”) to purchase all or any of                                 
(                ) of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Grant Shares”) at a purchase price of
$                 per share. The terms and conditions applicable to grants of options of the Company’s Common Stock, as set forth in the Plan, are
incorporated into and made part of this Agreement. The Option is intended to be an Incentive Stock Option, as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; if however, it fully or partially fails for whatever reason to
qualify, then under those circumstances, and to that extent, it shall be treated as a Non-Statutory Stock Option. 
  
 2. Time of Exercise of Option: The grant date of this Option is
                                ,
         (the “Grant Date”). Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein and until the Option expires or is terminated as provided in the Plan, this Option may be exercised from time
to time to purchase the Grant Shares as follows: 
  
 The Option shall become exercisable for 1/36th of the Grant Shares at the end of each one-month period, so
that the Option will be fully exercisable on the third anniversary of the Grant Date. 
  
 3. Expiration: The Option shall continue in effect until the earlier of the date ten years after the Grant Date, or the date thirty days after the Optionee’s service with the Company terminates (other than
by reason of death or disability), unless earlier terminated as provided in the Plan. 
  

							
	 ____________________, _________
	 	 
		
	 INTERLINK ELECTRONICS, INC.
	 	OPTIONEE
				
	 By:
	 	  

	 	By:
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We have issued our report, dated May 23, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Brazauro Resources Corporation on Form 20-F for the year ended January 31, 2008. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Brazauro Resources Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-147577 and 333-139278).

 

 

 

| Vancouver, Canada | “Morgan & Company” |
|-------------------|----------------------------------|

 

| May 23, 2008 | Chartered Accountants |
|--------------|-----------------------|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reed’s, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher J. Reed, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  August 10, 2010








/s/ Christopher J. Reed


Christopher J. Reed


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)














A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER        AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFCIER        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002                 In connection with the quarterly Report of TheraBiogen, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2009as filed        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),we, Kelly T. Hickel, Chief Executive Officer andWilliam Warchus, principal financial officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley        Act of 2002, that:                 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.         

August 14, 2009

/s/ Kelly T. Hickel        --------------------------------------        Kelly T. Hickel        Chief Executive Officer                 /s/William Warchus--------------------------------------

William Warchus

Principal Financial Officer
**Exhibit 10.32**

 

**SEVENTHAMENDMENT**

**OFTHE**

**SKY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. PROFIT SHARING, 401(K)AND ESOP PLAN**

(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2004) 

 

**WHEREAS********,**Sky Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Sky Financial Group, Inc. Profit Sharing, 401(k) and ESOP Plan (the “Plan”); and 

 

**WHEREAS********,** the Company has delegated authority to amend the Plan to the Sky FinancialGroup, Inc. Benefit Plans Committee (the “Committee”), and the Committee has determined that amendment of the Plan is necessary and desirable. 

 

**NOW, THEREFORE,** pursuant to the power reserved to the Company by Section 10.01 of the Plan, and byvirtue of the authority delegated to the Committee, the Plan, as previously amended, is hereby further amended, effective as of January 1, 2005, by adding the following to the end of the second paragraph of Section 13.14 of the Plan: 

 

“Notwithstanding the foregoing or theprovisions of Section 2.01, no Employee of Meyer & Eckenrode Investments, Inc. will be eligible to receive Profit Sharing Contributions provided for under Section 3.04 of the Plan, unless such Employee is scheduled to become an Employee of SkyTrust, N.A. on or around January 1, 2006.” 

 

*        *        * 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** on behalf of the Committee, the undersigned Committee member hasexecuted this amendment this 30th day of December 2005.
**Order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 10 February 2009 – Okalux v OHIM – Ondex (ONDACELL)**

**(Case T-126/08)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Failure to pay the opposition fee – Decision deeming the opposition non-existent – Action manifestly devoid of any legal basis

Community trade mark – Registration procedure – Observation of third parties and opposition (Commission Regulation No 2869/95, Arts 5 and 8) (see paras 27-28, 35)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 January 2008 (Case R 1384/2007‐4) regarding opposition proceedings between Okalux GmbH and Ondex SAS. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Okalux GmbH to pay the costs. |
# C_2012399EN.01001601.xml

| 22.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 November 2012 — Syndicat des thoniers méditerranéens and Others v Commission

(Case T-574/08) (1)

1

(Non-contractual liability - Fishing - Conservation of fishery resources - Reconstitution of the stocks of bluefin tuna - Emergency measures prohibiting fishing by purse seiners - Unusual loss)

2012/C 399/26

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Syndicat des thoniers méditerranéens (Marseille, France); Marc Carreno (Sète, France); Jean-Louis Donnarel (Lourmarin, France); Jean-François Flores (Sète); Gérald Lubrano (Balaruc-les-Bains, France); Hervé Marin (Balaruc-le-Vieux, France); Nicolas Marin (Frontignan, France); Sébastien Marin (Bouzigues, France); Jean-Marc Penniello (Collioure, France); Serge Antoine José Perez (Sorède, France) (represented by: C. Bonnefoi, lawyer); Jean-Luc Buono (Agde, France); Gérard Buono (Agde); Roger Louis Paul Del Ponte (Balaruc-les-Bains); Serge Antoine Di Rocco (Frontignan); Jean Gérald Lubrano (Balaruc-les-Bains); Jean Lubrano (Port-Vendres, France); Jean Lucien Lubrano (Saleilles, France); Fabrice Marin (Frontignan) and Robert Marin (Balaruc-les-Bains) (represented initially by: C. Bonnefoi, and subsequently by: A. Arnaud and P.-O. Koubi-Flotte, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Banks, F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and A. Bouquet, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for damages seeking compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicants following adoption of Commission Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 of 12 June 2008 establishing emergency measures as regards purse seiners fishing for bluefin tuna in the Atlantic Ocean, east of longitude 45° W, and in the Mediterranean Sea (OJ 2008 L 155, p. 9)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicants to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicants to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.

1

---
EXHIBIT
32.2 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Annual Report of Castelle (the Company) on Form 10-K/A
for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Cheng, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge: (1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.  /s/ Paul ChengName:
  Paul ChengTitle:
  Chief Financial OfficerDate:
  April 30, 2007 A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Castelle and
will be retained by Castelle and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# Union - Appalachian Regional Commission

- South Carolina Office of Rural Health: Dreaming Up New Recovery Solutions   Recovering from Substance Use Disorder (SUD) can be a vicious cycle, especially when it comes to accessing the treatment and support services needed to successfully secure meaningful employment. Furthermore, it’s not just an individual who feels these effects, but entire communities. In upstate South Carolina, public services in Cherokee, Pickens, and Union counties have been [&#8230;]The post South Carolina Office of Rural Health: Dreaming Up New Recovery Solutions   appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Catawba Regional Council of Governments Catawba Regional Council of Governments Address 215 Hampton Street, Suite 200Rock Hill, SC 29730 Executive Director Randy Imler Email crcog&#64;ca&#116;&#97;&#119;&#98;&#97;&#99;&#111;&#103;&#46;&#111;&#x72;&#x67;The post Catawba Regional Council of Governments appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
<PAGE>   1



               CRAFTMADE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
                                   EXHIBIT 21


The following schedule lists the subsidiaries of Craftmade International, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation, as of September 14, 1998:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    Corporate Name                              State of Organization            Percent Owned by Company
    --------------                              ---------------------            ------------------------

<S>                                                    <C>                           <C> 
Durocraft International, Inc.                           Texas                            100%
C/D/R Incorporated                                      Delaware                         100%
Trade Source International, Inc. (TSI)                  Delaware                         100%
TSI Prime Asia(A wholly-owned subsidiary of TSI)        Hong Kong                        100%
Elitex ( A wholly-owned subsidiary of TSI)              Hong Kong                        100%
Prime Home Impression LLC                               North Carolina                    50%
(A 50% owned subsidiary of TSI)
</TABLE>
# Washington - Appalachian Regional Commission

- First Tennessee Development District: Championing Caring Rural Workplaces Johnson City, Tennessee is home to a variety of community organizations supporting workforce opportunities for individuals both in recovery and transitioning from the justice system. Local employers have also demonstrated interest in hiring those workers in recovery and transition and enhancing support services for those employees and their families. What Johnson City was missing, however, [&#8230;]The post First Tennessee Development District: Championing Caring Rural Workplaces appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- First Tennessee Development District Executive Director Chris Craig &#160;Email &#x63;&#99;&#114;a&#x69;&#x67;&#64;f&#x74;&#x64;&#100;&#46;o&#x72;&#103;The post First Tennessee Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

David Garcia Reyes, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00228

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. F13

- 61746

- J ). Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment
of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to reflect that the correct name

of the offense is sexual assault of child

. As modified, th e judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
We note that the appellant, David Garcia Reyes, has adequately indicated his inability to
pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 2 , 2015 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS , III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
# C_2012138EN.01001401.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Rehbein v OHIM — Dias Martinho (OUTBURST)

(Case T-214/08) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of the Community figurative mark OUTBURST - Earlier national word mark OUTBURST - Genuine use of the earlier trade mark - Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Production of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 74(2) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009) - Rule 22(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

(2012/C 138/23)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Paul Alfons Rehbein (GmbH & Co.) KG (Glinde, Germany) (represented by: T. Lampel, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis and P. Geroulakos, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Hervé Dias Martinho and Manuel Carlos Dias Martinho (Le Plessis-Trévise, France)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 March 2008 (Case R 1261/2007-2) concerning opposition proceedings between, on the one hand, Paul Alfons Rehbein (GmbH & Co.) KG and, on the other hand, Hervé Dias Martinho and Manuel Carlos Dias Martinho.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 13 March 2008 (Case R 1261/2007-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 13 March 2008 (Case R 1261/2007-2);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 197, 2.8.2008.

---
# C_2010328EN.01002901.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 October 2010 — Agapiou Joséphidès v Commission and EACEA

(Case T-439/08) (1)

1

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to the award of a Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence to the University of Cyprus - Documents emanating from a third party - Partial refusal of access - Action for annulment - Time-limit for action - Inadmissibility - Objection of illegality - Exception relating to the protection of the privacy and integrity of the individual - Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests - Duty to give reasons)

2010/C 328/48

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kalliope Agapiou Joséphidès (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: C. Josephides, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Owsiany-Hornung and G. Rozet, acting as Agents); and Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) (represented by: H. Monet, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment, firstly, of the decision of the EACEA of 1 August 2008, concerning a request for access to certain documents relating to the award of a Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence to the University of Cyprus and, secondly, of Commission Decision C(2007) 3749 of 8 August 2008 relating to an individual decision to award a subsidy within the framework of the Lifelong Learning Programme, Jean Monnet sub-programme

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Kalliope Agapiou Joséphidès to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Kalliope Agapiou Joséphidès to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 237, 20.12.2008.

1

---
Re: Docket FAA

- 2011

- 1149

December 8, 2011

We at Sheffield School of Aeronautics would like to point out that the public comment period regarding the clarification of Designated Aircraft Dispatcher Policy has been extended until February 8, 2012.

We were advised of this by John Allen, Director of the Flight Standards Service (AFS

1) in writing on Tuesday afternoon, December 6. However, since today is the publicly announced, initial deadline and since the approval of the extension has not yet appeared in the docket folder, we wanted to ensure that word of this extension was available to the public before the initial period closed, in case the formal announcement has been delayed due to internal coordination. A search of the daily Federal Register entries for December 6 thru December 8 shows that at this time, the official announcement has not been entered and thus likely will not appear in the Federal Register or in the docket folder before the previously announced deadline has passed.

The written notice was delivered to Sheffield School via the following email message:

From: John_Allen/AWA/FAA@faa.gov

Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 15:34:27

- 0500

To: Eric Morris < morris@sheffield.com >, peggy.gilligan@faa.gov

Cc: john.s.duncan@faa.gov

, Anne.Bechdolt@faa.gov , Rico Carty

< Robert.Carty@faa.gov > Subject: Re:

Mr. Morris,

We have further reviewed the issues in regards to your request for a comment period extension. Due to the holidays we have decided to extend the comment period with a closing date of Febuary 8. 20 12

John Allen Director, FAA Flight Standards Service



### We are certain the above mentioned extension will appear formally in the Federal Register at some point, but we are aware of other parties drafting comments and felt that we were obligated to ensu re that the public was aware of this change to the deadline in case they would have otherwise been discouraged, and also so that the public would not feel rushed to submit abridged or incomplete comments this evening.

Regards,

Eric Morris

President

Sheff ield School of Aeronautics (est. 1948)
# C_2009282EN.01006502.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/65

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 8 July 2009 — Sevenier v Commission

(Case F-62/08) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Permanent termination of service - Resignation - Application to withdraw)

2009/C 282/124

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Roberto Sevenier (Paris, France) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission’s decision rejecting the applicant’s request to withdraw his tender of resignation and for his case to be submitted to the medical committee and, consequently, an application for reinstatement of the applicant at the European Commission with reconstitution of his career from the date of his resignation.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Tribunal:

| (1) | dismisses the action as being manifestly inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

dismisses the action as being manifestly inadmissible;

| (2) | orders Mr Sevenier to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

(2)

orders Mr Sevenier to pay the costs;

| (3) | declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene; |
| --- | --- |

(3)

declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene;

| (4) | orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 247 of 27.09.2008 p. 25

1

---