alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008313EN.01001801.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/18

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 1 October 2008 — Yaesu Europe BV v Bundeszentralamt für Steuern

(Case C-433/08)

(2008/C 313/26)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Yaesu Europe BV

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundeszentralamt für Steuern

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the term ‘Signature’ in the specimen in Annex A to the Eighth Council Directive 79/1072/EEC of 6 December 1979 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Arrangements for the refund of value added tax to taxable persons (1) not established in the territory of the country, which is to be used to submit an application for a refund of turnover tax pursuant to Article 3(a) of the directive, to be to be given a uniform Community law interpretation? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the term ‘Signature’ in the specimen in Annex A to the Eighth Council Directive 79/1072/EEC of 6 December 1979 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Arrangements for the refund of value added tax to taxable persons (1) not established in the territory of the country, which is to be used to submit an application for a refund of turnover tax pursuant to Article 3(a) of the directive, to be to be given a uniform Community law interpretation?

1

| 2. | If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative:
  Is the term ‘Signature’ to be understood as meaning that the application for a refund must be signed by the taxable person himself or, in regard to a legal person, by its statutory representative, or is the signature of an agent (for example, a representative for tax purposes or an employee of the taxable person) sufficient? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative:

Is the term ‘Signature’ to be understood as meaning that the application for a refund must be signed by the taxable person himself or, in regard to a legal person, by its statutory representative, or is the signature of an agent (for example, a representative for tax purposes or an employee of the taxable person) sufficient?

---

(1)  OJ L 331, 1979, p. 11.

1

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4599 

To redesignate Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia as Rock Creek 

National Park. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2017 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To redesignate Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia 

as Rock Creek National Park. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rock Creek National 

5 Park Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF ROCK CREEK PARK AS ROCK 

7 CREEK NATIONAL PARK. 

8 (a) REDESIGNATION.—In recognition of its nationally 

9 significant natural, cultural, and historical resources, and 

10 important recreational opportunities, Rock Creek Park in 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4599 IH

1 the District of Columbia, established by the Act of Sep2 tember 27, 1890 (26 Stat. 492), is redesignated as ‘‘Rock 

3 Creek National Park’’. 

4 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Title 40, United 

5 States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in section 8104(b), by striking ‘‘Rock Creek 

7 Park’’ and inserting ‘‘Rock Creek National Park’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) in section 8501(a)(3)(B), by striking ‘‘Rock 

10 Creek Park’’ and inserting ‘‘Rock Creek National 

11 Park’’. 

12 (c) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, map, 

13 regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

14 States to Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia 

15 is deemed to be a reference to Rock Creek National Park. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the
Chief Executive Officer of Email Real Estate.com,
Inc. (the 'Company"), hereby certify, that to the
best of my knowledge, the Quarterly report on Form
10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
November 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 14, 2002

/s/Dan O'Meara,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the
Chief Financial Officer of Email Real Estate.com,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, that to the
best of my knowledge, the Quarterly report on Form
10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
November 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 14, 2002

 /s/ Dan O'Meara
Dan O'Meara, President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors



The Board of Directors
Performance Food Group Company:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos.   33-72400,  333-12223  and  333-78229)  on  Form  S-8  and   the
registration statements (Nos. 333-24679 and 333-68877) on Form S-4  and
the  registration statement (No. 333-48462) on Form S-3 of  Performance
Food  Group Company of our reports dated February 5, 2001, relating  to
the  consolidated balance sheets of Performance Food Group Company  and
subsidiaries as of December 30, 2000 and January 1, 2000,  the  related
consolidated  statements  of earnings, shareholders'  equity  and  cash
flows  for  each  of  the fiscal years in the three-year  period  ended
December 30, 2000, and the related financial statement schedule,  which
reports are included in this Form 10-K.


                                   /s/ KPMG LLP

Richmond, Virginia
March 26, 2001
Old World Bollworm

Trapping 

& Treatment Scouting

Quick Reference

Program: Old World Bollworm

Application: ArcGIS Field Maps

Host: USDA-MRP GIS Enterprise (Portal)

Trapping: PPQ OWB Trapping 2024 Field Map

Treatment Scouting: PPQ OWB PreTreatment Scouting 2024 QuickCapture

CHECK URL! https://maps.mrp.usda.gov/arcgis/

IMPORTANT!! You must synchronize your map at the beginning/end of each workday.

FOR ALL DATA ENTRY IN FIELD MAPS:

1. Open ArcGIS Field Maps. Confirm correct ArcGIS Enterprise URL.

2. Open previously downloaded map area & stand at the point you wish to collect. 

3. Tap the Layers icon & toggle ON the layers you wish to view/edit.

4. Tap the blue plus sign in the lower-right corner of the map to add data.

Trapping

Place a Trap

Follow steps under “For All Data Entry” above.

1. Complete the data form (Verify the Install Date field is Today.)

* Asterisks indicate mandatory fields. 

2. Review your entered data carefully and tap the Submit button in the upper right corner.

Trap Activity

1. Tap the trap symbol on the map to select it. The data form opens on the left.

2. Scroll down and tap "OWB Trapping Activities 2024" or tap the link icon. 

3. Tap the blue Add button and complete the activities data form. 

Verify the Activity Date field is Today.

4. Review your entered data carefully and tap the Submit button in the upper right corner.

Relocate a Trap

Follow steps under “For All Data Entry” above.

On original trap, record:

1. Trap Activity: “OWB Trap Activities 2024” – Remove > Submit

2. Transport the trap to its new location and perform “Place a Trap” steps as above.

If the Submit button fails, you have not completed all required fields or GPS accuracy failed.

ArcGIS Field Maps 

Mobile Application

W. Billen, Pflanzenbeschaustelle, Weil am Rhein, Bugwood.org

Layers icon

Add data button

ArcGIS QuickCapture 

Mobile Application
Last Updated: 21 March 2024 14:14 2

Pre-Treatment Scouting

This data entry is collected using the ArcGIS QuickCapture application.

To locate, open the ArcGIS QuickCapture application or follow the embedded link 

from ArcGIS Field Maps within any existing scouted treatment area.

1. Enable the Reference Layers group and the OWB Pre-Treatment Scouting 

layer.

2. Tap to select any existing scouted treatment area on the map

3. Locate the prompt at the top of the data form.

“Tap to record a scouted treatment area in QuickCapture.”

4. Tap on the link to jump to QuickCapture.

In ArcGIS QuickCapture, tap to open “PPQ OWB Pretreatment Scouting 2024 QuickCapture”.

As prompted:

1. Enter the Area Name (required)

2. Tap Collecting and begin moving to collect the area perimeter (tap to start and then tap to stop)

a. Edit the Area Name by tapping the pencil icon next to it (if desired)

3. Enter Notes (optional)

To view your entered polygons in the map, return to Field Maps and open the layer within the Reference 

layers group – “OWB Pre-Treatment Scouting”.

For more details, refer to the PPQ OWB Trapping Field Map User Manual.

ArcGIS QuickCapture 

Mobile Application
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5765]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. CANSECO:
        H.R. 6368.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 of the United States 
     Constitution which states that Congress shall have the power 
     to provide for our nation's common defense. This legislation 
     would increase our nation's security, which falls under the 
     purview of Congress' granted power to provide for the common 
     defense, as stated above.
```
EXHIBIT
31.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, SCOTT C.
  MCDONALD, certify that:1.
  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of
  Castelle;2.
  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
  any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
  which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
  covered by this annual report;3.
  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
  other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in
  all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
  flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
  report;4.
  The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
  are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
  procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
  registrant and have:a)
  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
  caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
  supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
  those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
  being prepared;b)
  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
  disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
  conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
  procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
  evaluation; andc)
  disclosed in this report any change in the
  registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
  the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
  reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
  over financial reporting; and5.
  The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
  have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
  financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
  registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  functions):a)
  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
  in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
  are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
  process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
  management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
  internal control over financial reporting.  Date: April 30, 2007
  By:
  /s/ SCOTT C. MCDONALDScott C. McDonaldPresident and Chief
  Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY



Name                                      Jurisdiction           Ownership %
----------------------------              ------------           -----------

Advanced Machine Programming, Inc.        Delaware               100%
Asyst Automation, Inc.                    Massachusetts          100%
Asyst Germany GmbH                        Germany                100%
Asyst Japan KK                            Japan                  95%
Asyst Korea Co., Ltd.                     Korea                  100%
Asyst Software, Inc.                      Delaware               100%
Asyst Technologies, Inc. (FSC)            Barbados               100%
Asyst Technologies (Far East) PTE, LTD    Singapore              100%
Asyst Technologies Malaysia Sd. Bhd.      Malaysia               100%
Asyst Technologies (Taiwan) Ltd.          Taiwan                 100%
Asyst Technologies (U.K.) Ltd.            United Kingdom         100%
GW Associates, Inc.                       Delaware               100%
Hine Design Incorporated                  California             100%
Palo Alto Technologies, Inc.              California             100%
Progressive System, Inc.                  Delaware               100%
Radiance Systems, Incorporated            California             100%
SemiFab, Inc.                             Delaware               100%
SMIF Equipment (Tianjen)                  China                  100%
Company, Ltd.

                                      1.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 21-0005

IN RE THE MOTION OF CHRISTOPHER T.WRIGHTFOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

# FILED MAR 3 0 2021
Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court Oillmönta"

Christopher T. Wright has filed a motion for admission to the Bar ofthe State of Montana pursuant to Rule V ofthe Rules for Admission,Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions Administrator ofthe State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character and Fitnesshas certified that Wright has provided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator,Christopher T. Wright may be sworn in to the practice oflaw in the State ofMontana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office ofthe Clerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this3

b day ofMarch,2021. 03/30/2021

Case Number: PR 21-0005/ 4 Justices
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Norberto Cordero, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Charde, J.), rendered July 30, 1986, convicting him of rape in the first degree, attempted coercion in the first degree, and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the judgment of conviction should be reversed or, alternatively, a reconstruction hearing should be held because of the unavailability of a portion of the trial transcript containing readbacks of the complaining witness’s testimony to the jury.

*810It is well established that the mere unavailability of a portion of the trial transcript does not require reversal and that the defendant must set forth the nature of the issues that would have been raised on appeal had the minutes been available *(see, People v Glass,*43 NY2d 283; *People v Rivera,*39 NY2d 519; *People v Bell,*36 AD2d 406, *affd*29 NY2d 882; *People v Acevedo,*104 AD2d 946). The defendant failed to raise any appealable issues. He merely alleges that the missing transcript is "crucial” to appellate review. Therefore, he is not entitled to a reversal of his judgment of conviction *(see, People v Bell, supra).*Nor is there any need for a reconstruction hearing. Those portions of the record which were read back to the jury are readily discernible from the record on appeal. Moreover, the defendant does not allege that the requested testimony was not read back or that the readback was in some way inaccurate or erroneous. Under these circumstances, the defendant has not been prejudiced in presenting his case and he has not been deprived of an effective appeal *(see, People v Glass, supra; People v Acevedo, supra).*

The defendant’s sentence is in all respects proper *(see,*Penal Law § 70.06; *People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, does not warrant reversal. Mangano, P. J., Kooper, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CONG THANH CHAU, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent. 

No. 16-70010 

Agency No. A042-811-907 

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2017**

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Cong Thanh Chau, a native and citizen of Vietnam, petitions pro se for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an 

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his motion to reconsider and reopen 

removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 16 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-70010 

for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen or reconsider and review de 

novo questions of law. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 

2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. 

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Chau’s motion to 

reconsider and reopen as untimely, where it was filed fourteen years after his final 

order of removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1), and Chau failed to establish any 

exception to the filing deadline, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4).

To the extent Chau contends he is eligible for status under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1154(f), the IJ correctly noted that the granting of such status is outside of the 

immigration court’s jurisdiction, see 8 U.S.C. § 1154(f)(1) (petition for 

classification is to be filed with the Attorney General), and the record does not 

reflect that Chau has filed such a petition.

To the extent Chau requests prosecutorial discretion, we lack jurisdiction to 

consider that request. See Vilchiz-Soto v. Holder, 688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 

2012) (order).

Chau’s remaining contentions, including alleged violations of due process, 

equal protection, and international law, are unpersuasive. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 446 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 446

     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2017

 Mr. Griffith introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 12737, the Commission may, at the request of the licensee for 
the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good 
faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of that section 
and the Commission's procedures under that section, extend the time 
period during which the licensee is required to commence the 
construction of the project for up to 3 consecutive 2-year periods from 
the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued by the 
Commission.
    (b) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the period required for 
commencement of construction of the project described in subsection (a) 
has expired prior to the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Commission may reinstate the license for the project effective as of 
the date of its expiration and the first extension authorized under 
subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of such expiration.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 249 (Friday, December 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 90218-90219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28730]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 29, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby

[[Page 90219]]

gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 22, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 39 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-135, CP2024-141.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-28730 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P