alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008116EN.01003602.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/36

---

Action brought on 11 March 2008 — Simon v Commission

(Case F-34/08)

(2008/C 116/71)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Anne Simon (Nouackhott, Mauritania) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of 25 October 2007 of the European Personnel Selection Office inasmuch as it did not include the applicant's name on the list of successful candidates and in the CAST 27/Relex database.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 25 October 2007 of the European Personnel Selection Office inasmuch as it did not include the applicant's name on the list of successful candidates and in the CAST 27/Relex database; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 25 October 2007 of the European Personnel Selection Office inasmuch as it did not include the applicant's name on the list of successful candidates and in the CAST 27/Relex database;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
### •::-vT:!rG ^

' ' ^ Jun e 8,201 1

Petitio n for

Exemptio n Rule s Docke t

(AGC-10 ) Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenu e S W Washington , D C 2059 1 T o Who mI t

May Concern ; I woul dlik e t o appl y for

a n exemptio n t o FA R91.109(a) ^ pennittin g m e to instruc t i n single-contro l Beechcraf t aircraft . I hav e ove r

1 ^00 0 hour s experienc e i n bothsingle-contro l an ddual-contro l Beechcraf t aircraft , and , unti l recently , I owne dan dfle w asingle-contro l Beechcraf t Bonanza . Instructio n woul donl y b e give n t o pilot s tha t

ar e qualifie dt o ac t

a s PIC , i.e. , thos e tha t

hav e comple x an d hig hpertbrmanc e endorsement s fo r single-engin e aircraft , a s wel l a s multi-engin e rating s for

multi-engin e aircraft . Sincerely , Donal dE . Wrigh t CFII142482 6 10 5 Ol dForg e Rd , Bo x 20 9 Erwinna , F A 1892 0 dwri eht(2).eDix . ne t Cel l 90 8 28 5 176 7

3 0 39W

d9NI>iyW3"in y J O 30IJJ 0 Si09Z.9320 S T0:T t TI02/St/^ 0
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Terra Trema,  Inc., on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the  undersigned,  Alan
Lomax,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: May 20, 2005

 /s/ Alan Lomax
------------------------------------
     Alan Lomax
     President and Director
    (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000
<PERIOD-START>                  FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                1,463
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                         33,547
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                                7,948
<DEPRECIATION>                        2,182
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      173,841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     0
<BONDS>                              12,746
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                           5,396
<COMMON>                                  5
<OTHER-SE>                            5,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        173,841
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     17,037
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        16,528
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    3,035
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         509
<INCOME-TAX>                            200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     309
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                            309
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .37


</TABLE>
Order issued January 25, 2013

In The 

## Qtuurt ufpnats 3JTiftI! 

## ktnrt øf

## ixa at Iattu
No. 05-11-01543-CR ERIC GLENN BROWN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellec ORDER BeforeJustices Bridges, O’Neill, andMurphy Based onthe Court’s opinion ofthis date, we GRANT the September 6, 2012 motion of Kathleen A. Walsh for leave to withdraw as appointed counsel on appeal. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to remove Kathleen A. Walsh as counsel of record for appellant. We DIRECT the Clerk ofthe Court to send a copy ofthis order and all future correspondence to Eric GlennBrown, No. 1760826, Torres Unit. 125 Private Road4303, Hondo, Texas, 78861. 

### 7— DAVID L. BRIDGE JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4483 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4483

   To abolish the Federal Insurance Office of the Department of the 
                   Treasury, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 2017

Mr. Mooney of West Virginia (for himself, Mr. Walker, and Mr. Davidson) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To abolish the Federal Insurance Office of the Department of the 
                   Treasury, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Insurance Office Abolishment 
Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. ABOLISHMENT OF FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE.

    (a) In General.--The Federal Insurance Office of the Department of 
the Treasury, and the position of the Director of the Federal Insurance 
Office, are hereby abolished.
    (b) Amendment.--Title 31, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking section 313; and
            (2) in the table of sections for subchapter I of chapter 3, 
        by striking the item relating to section 313.
    (c) Treasury Authority.--This section, and the amendment made by 
this section, may not be construed to repeal or otherwise limit any 
authority of the Secretary of the Treasury with respect matters 
relating to insurance.

SEC. 3. RELATED AMENDMENTS.

    The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is 
amended--
            (1) in section 111(b)(2) (12 U.S.C. 5321(b)(2))--
                    (A) by striking subparagraph (B); and
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (C), (D), and 
                (E) as subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D), respectively;
            (2) in section 112(d)(2) (12 U.S.C. 5322(d)(2)), by 
        striking ``any member agency, and the Federal Insurance 
        Office,'' and inserting ``and any member agency'';
            (3) in section 165(i) (12 U.S.C. 5365(i))--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ``and the 
                Federal Insurance Office'' and inserting ``and the 
                Secretary of the Treasury''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking ``and the 
                Federal Insurance Office'' and inserting ``and the 
                Secretary of the Treasury''; and
            (4) in section 203(a)(1)(C), by striking ``the Director of 
        the Federal Insurance Office and'' and inserting ``and the 
        Secretary of the Treasury and''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Bennie Harold DOBBS, Plaintiff in Error, v. CITY OF TULSA, Defendant in Error.

No. A-13052.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 27, 1961.

*397Joe Tom Smith, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Charles Norman, City Atty., William D. Borders, Asst. City Atty., Tulsa, for defendant in error.

BUSSEY, Judge.

Plaintiff in error, Bennie Harold Dobbs, hereinafter referred to as defendant was charged in the Municipal Criminal Court ■of the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, with the ■offense of reckless driving in violation of ■Ordinance 7110, Section 64, of the City of Tulsa. He was arraigned before the honorable John M. Imel, Judge of the Municipal Criminal Court of Tulsa, and entered a plea of guilty. The minutes of the court reflect that on January 10, 1961, he was sentenced to serve a term of 30 days in the City Jail and pay a fine of $150. On January 17, 1961, he filed a motion for new trial and the same was overruled. The defendant thereafter attempted to perfect an appeal to this court. This cause was set for oral argument on the 26th of July and was submitted on the record and brief of the defendant.

> 11 O.S.(1951)' § 765 provides:

> “Appeals may be taken from the judgment or order of municipal criminal courts in cities of a population of more than 100,000 according to the last preceding Federal Decennial Census to the Criminal Court of Appeals in the same manner and to the same extent that appeals are now taken from the County Courts to the Criminal' Court of Appeals in criminal matters, and no appeals other than those herein provided shall be allowed.”

It is clear that in order to perfect an appeal either by transcript or by casemade from the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Tulsa the record must contain a copy of the formal judgment and sentence as is required when an appeal is taken from County Court.

We have carefully examined the record in the instant case and find that no formal judgment and sentence is contained therein. Our court has repeatedly held that a record cannot be considered even as a transcript when casemade does not contain a formal judgment and sentence. This court does not acquire jurisdiction in an appeal by transcript where transcript or case-made contains no copy of the judgment of the trial court, and under such conditions the appeal will be dismissed. Smith v. State, Okl.Cr., 362 P.2d 113; Loyd v. State, 12 Okl.Cr. 82, 151 P. 1190; Mitchell v. State, 17 Okl.Cr. 513, 190 P. 268.

Appeal dismissed.

NIX, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of LIVE GLOBAL BID, INC. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ended  December,  31,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Barry
White,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Barry White
                                                   --------------------------
Date: February 23, 2004                                Barry White
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
# Align M690L Specifications

M690L Airframe Specifications :



### • Airframe Diameter: 900mm



### • Height: 446mm



### • Main Blade Length: 179mm



### • Main Rotor Diameter: 391mm



### • Flying Weight (without battery): 3400g



### • Recommended battery : 1 X 6S 5200mah / 1 X 6S 12000mah / 2 X 6S 5200mah battery

APS - M Multicopter Control Unit :



### • Input Voltage : DC4.5V~8.4V



### • Operating Current Consumption : <250mA@ 4.8V



### • Operating Frequency : 400Hz



### • Operating Temperature :

- 20° ~ 65°C(

- 4° ~ 149 °F)



### • Hovering Precision (Depending on Satellite Status) : Horizontal ±1m(3.28ft) / Vertical ±1m(3.28ft)



### • Highest Flight Speed : Horizontal 15m/sec, Vertical 6m/sec



### • Maximum Altitude Restriction : 700m(2297ft) above the takeoff point



### • Maximum Angular Speed : Aileron/Elevator 115° /sec, Rudder 145° /sec



### • Maximum Tilting Angle : 30 degrees



### • Supports External Peripherals : G2 / G3 Gimbal 、 OSD+FPV Vide o Transmitter



### • Supports Multicopter Configurations : 4 rotors +, 4 rotors X, 6 rotors +, 6 rotors X, 8 rotors +, 8 rotors X.



### • Dimension : 49 x 34.3 x 20mm

PCU Power Control Unit :



### • Input Voltage : 13.2V~25.2V (4S~6S Li

- Po)



### • Operating Frequency : 500KHz



### • Dimens ion : 62 x 35 x 26mm

Motor ESC :



### • Input Voltage : 13.2V~25.2V (4S~6S Li

- Po)



### • Max Continuous Current : 40A



### • Dimension : 74.2 x 27 x 12.7mm BL4213 Motor 370KV(RPM/V) :

### • Input Voltage : DC 22.2V



### • Max Continuous Current : 25A



### • Max Continuous Power : 550W



### • Stator Arms : 12



### • Magnet Poles : 14



### • Dimension / Weight : Φ 4 x Φ 52 x 33mm / 185g
# C_2010221EN.01003702.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2010 — Cementir Italia v Commission

(Case T-63/08) (1)

1

(State aid - Compensation for expropriation on grounds of public interest - Temporal extension of a preferential tariff for the supply of electricity - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Concept of advantage - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations - Aid measure put into effect)

2010/C 221/59

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cementir Italia Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: T. Salonico, G. Pellegrino, G. Pellegrino and G. Barone, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito and G. Conte, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Decision 2008/408/EC of the Commission of 20 November 2007 on the State aid C 36/A/06 (ex NN 38/06) implemented by Italy in favour of ThyssenKrupp, Cementir and Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche (OJ 2008 L 144, p. 37)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application.

| 2. | Orders Cementir Italia Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Cementir Italia Srl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

1

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4456 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 

amounts paid for medical expenses to a health care sharing ministry, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2017 

Mr. BABIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 

deduction for amounts paid for medical expenses to a 

health care sharing ministry, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Care Sharing 

5 Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SELF-EMPLOYED MEDICAL EXPENSE DEDUCTION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 162 of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting at the end 

9 of subsection (l) the following new paragraph: 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4456 IH

1 ‘‘(6) HEALTH CARE SHARING MINISTRY.—The 

2 allowance of a deduction under paragraph (1) shall 

3 include amounts paid by such taxpayer as a member 

4 of a health care sharing ministry (as defined in sec5 tion 5000A(d)(2)(B)(ii)) for— 

6 ‘‘(A) the sharing of the medical expenses 

7 of fellow members, and 

8 ‘‘(B) the administrative fees of the health 

9 care sharing ministry.’’. 

10 (b) MEDICAL EXPENSE DEDUCTION.— 

11 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 

12 213(d) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

13 the end of subparagraph (C), by striking the period 

14 at the end of subparagraph (D) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, 

15 and by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(E) for— 

17 ‘‘(i) the sharing of medical expenses 

18 of fellow members of a health care sharing 

19 ministry (as defined in 

20 5000A(d)(2)(B)(ii)), and 

21 ‘‘(ii) the administrative fees of such 

22 health care sharing ministry.’’. 

23 (2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) of section 

24 213(d) of such Code, as amended by paragraph (1), 

25 is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘For 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4456 IH

1 purposes of subparagraph (E), amounts paid does 

2 not include any amount deductible under section 

3 170.’’. 

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


daltland on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
Advisory agreements for Pru- Securities  Strategic Trust,WMT II, Series D


 Exhibit 10.7 
  

					
	 	  	Two American Lane	  	Tel 203.861.1031
	 


	  	P.O. Box 5150	  	Fax 203.552.1501
	  	Greenwich, Connecticut	  	 
	  	06831-8150	  	 
	  	  
 Joseph J. Allessie
	  	 
	 	  	Senior Vice President	  	 
	 	  	General Counsel	  	 

  
 September 14, 2004 
  
 Bridgewater Associates. Inc. 
 Attn: General Counsel/Secretary 
 One Glendinning Place 
 Westport, CT 06880 
  
 Re: Advisory Agreements
for Pru-Securities Strategic Trust, World Monitor Trust II – Series D, PB International Futures Fund C 
  
 Please be advised that it is anticipated that as of October 1, 2004, all the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Prudential Securities Futures Management
Inc. (the “Prudential Managing Owners”) of the above stated Trusts/Fund are owned by Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. f/k/a Kenmar Advisory Corp. (the “Kenmar Managing Owner”). Therefore, with respect to the various advisory
agreements currently in effect by and between the Trusts/Fund, the Prudential Managing Owner and you, please be notified that the Kenmar Managing Owner has assumed the liabilities and obligations of the Prudential Managing Owner thereunder and will
continue to satisfy and perform all liabilities and obligations thereunder. 
  
 The Kenmar Managing Owner will continue to operate per the existing advisory agreements. If this is acceptable, please sign both copies of this Letter Agreement and return one copy. 
  

			
	PREFERRED INVESTMENT SOLUTIONS CORP.
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Joseph J. Allessie


	 Name:
	 	Joseph J. Allessie
	 Title:
	 	Senior Vice President, General Counsel
	
	 ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

	
	 BRIDGEWATER ASSOCIATES, INC

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Peter R. La Tronica


	 Name:
	 	Peter R. La Tronica
	 Title:
	 	Bridgewater Associates
	 	 	Vice President
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1407]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 RECOGNIZING ED WENZEL AND HIS HONOR FROM THE NATIONAL CIVIL WAR TRUST

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. GERALD E. CONNOLLY

                              of virginia

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, I rise to recognize Ed Wenzel 
for his passion, effort, and success in preserving our nation's 
historic Civil War battlegrounds. Mr. Wenzel recently received an honor 
from the national Civil War Trust on behalf of his preservation efforts 
for a Civil War battlefield site in Chantilly, Virginia. The Ox Hill 
Battlefield Park was dedicated in 2008 thanks in large part to the 
tireless efforts of Mr. Wenzel.
   Mr. Wenzel spent 22 years working to preserve the grounds on which 
the Battle of Chantilly--referred to as the Battle of Ox Hill by the 
Confederacy--occurred on September 1, 1862. It was during this battle 
that the Union army lost commanders Major General Philip Kearny and 
Major General Isaac I. Stevens, but it ultimately succeeded in slowing 
General Stonewall Jackson and the Confederacy's advancements and ended 
the Second Manassas campaign. In 1915, monuments were built in 
commemoration of both Major Generals Kearny and Stevens on the site.
   During my tenure on the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors, I was 
proud to work with Mr. Wenzel and members of the Civil War Roundtable 
to raise awareness of the County's Civil War heritage, to erect new 
historic markers, and create a new five-acre public park highlighting 
the monuments and the battle significance in the history of our County 
and our Country.
   Additionally, Mr. Wenzel played a major role in the Save the 
Battlefield Coalition, which successfully opposed construction of a 
shopping mall at Manassas battlegrounds in 1988, and he was a founding 
board member of the Association for the Preservation of Civil War 
Sites.
   Mr. Speaker, I ask my colleagues to join me in recognizing Ed Wenzel 
for his most recent accolade and in thanking him for his tireless 
pursuits to protect such important aspects of our Nation's rich 
history.

                          ____________________
```