alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 20144 and # 20145; UTAH Disaster Number UT-20001]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Utah (FEMA-4752-DR), dated 12/23/2023. *Incident:*
                         Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         05/01/2023 through 05/27/2023.
 DATES: Issued on 12/23/2023. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         02/21/2024. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         09/23/2024.
 ADDRESSES: *Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*
                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 12/23/2023, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications online using the MySBA Loan Portal 
                    *https://lending.sba.gov*
                     or other locally announced locations. Please contact the SBA disaster assistance customer service center by email at 
                    *disastercustomerservice@sba.gov*
                     or by phone at 1-800-659-2955 for further assistance. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties: Iron, Morgan, Sanpete, Utah, Wasatch. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 201446 and for economic injury is 201450. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Francisco Sánchez, Jr., Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.


[FR Doc. 2023-28787 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
# C_2011046EN.01001002.xml

| 12.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/10

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM (Representation of a small bell with a red ribbon)

(Case T-346/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark - Representation of a small bell with a red ribbon - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2011/C 46/17

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG (Kilchberg, Switzerland) (represented by: R. Lange, E. Schalast and G. Hild, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 June 2008 (Case R 943/2007-4), concerning an application for registration as a Community trade mark of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the representation of a small bell with a red ribbon.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 11.10.2008.

1

---
# C_2010221EN.01001101.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Alessandria — Italy) — Agra Srl v Agenzia Dogane Ufficio delle Dogane di Alessandria

(Case C-75/09) (1)

1

(Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Community Customs Code - Article 221(3) and (4) - Post-clearance recovery of the customs debt - Limitation period - Act which could give rise to criminal court proceedings)

2010/C 221/17

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Alessandria

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Agra Srl

Applicant:

Defendant: Agenzia Dogane Ufficio delle Dogane di Alessandria

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Alessandria — Interpretation of Article 221(3) and (4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1) — Recovery of the customs debt — Exceeding the time-limit for communicating the amount of duty to be recovered in the case of a debt resulting from an act that could give rise to criminal court proceedings — National legislation providing for the suspension of that time-limit until the decision given on the criminal proceedings initiated because of the act that caused the customs debt has become definitive.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 221(3) and (4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2700/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2000, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation under which, where the failure to pay customs duty has its origins in a criminal offence, time for the purposes of the limitation period for recovery of the customs debt is to run from the date on which the order or judgment in the criminal proceedings becomes final.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 1.5.2009.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December
31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), We, R.H. Dillon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James F. Laird, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/S/    R.H. DILLONPrint Name: R.H. Dillon Title: Chief Executive Officer Date: March 30, 2005




/S/    JAMES F.
LAIRDPrint Name: James F. Laird Title: Chief Financial Officer Date: March 30, 2005
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5772]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              THE JOURNAL

  The SPEAKER. The Chair has examined the Journal of the last day's 
proceedings and announces to the House his approval thereof.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal stands approved.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit
10.13


 


	
   

  	
  RightNow Technologies, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  ID: 81-0503640

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Notice of Grant of Stock Options

  	
  40 Enterprise Blvd.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  and Option Agreement

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  P.O. Box 9300

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Bozeman, MT 59718-9300

  



 


 


	
  [Name]

  	
   

  	
  Option Number:

  	
  [      ]

  
	
  [Address]

  	
   

  	
  Plan:

  	
  2004

  
	
  [City], [State]

  	
  [Country] [Mail Code]

  	
  ID:

  	
  [      ]

  



 


 


Effective
[Date], you have been granted a(n) Incentive [Non-Incentive] Stock Option to
buy [number] shares of RightNow Technologies, Inc. (the Company) stock at
[$Price] per share.


 


The
total option price of the shares granted is [$ total option price]


 


Shares
in each period will become fully vested on the date shown.


 


	
  Shares

  	
  Vest Type

  	
  Full Vest

  	
  Expiration

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  [No. of Shares]

  	
  On Vest Date

  	
  [Date]

  	
  [Date]

  
							



 


[No. of shares vesting are
listed for each vest date]


 


By
your signature and the Company’s signature below, you and the Company agree
that these options are granted under and governed by the terms and conditions
of the Company’s Stock Option Plan as amended and the Option Agreement, all of
which are attached and made a part of this document.


 


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  RightNow Technologies, Inc.

  	
   

  	
  Date

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  [Name]

  	
   

  	
  Date

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  10/20/2004

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Time:

  	
  12:02:55PM
Exhibit 32.1 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of iWorld Projects & Systems, Inc. (the ?Company?), does
hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005
(the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2005

/s/ Robert Hipple
------------------------
Name:  Robert Hipple
Title:  Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 14, 2005

/s/ David Pells
-------------------------
Name:  David Pells
Title:  Chief Operating Officer and President

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
a separate disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1412]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

COMMEMORATING THE 70TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE GUADALCANAL CAMPAIGN OF WORLD 
                                 WAR II

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. ADAM SMITH

                             of washington

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I rise in commemoration of the 
70th anniversary of the Guadalcanal campaign of World War II.
  This month, as we approach the 70th anniversary of Guadalcanal, we 
are reminded of the many sacrifices that brought freedom and security 
to the South Pacific. We reflect upon the 7,100 men who gave their 
lives in the Guadalcanal campaign.
  Guadalcanal lasted more than six months and effectively ended the 
military expansion of our enemies in the South Pacific. During that 
time, more than 60,000 Allied personnel participated in gaining control 
of Guadalcanal, its surrounding islands, and Henderson Field, a 
particularly important location to enemy forces. There is no doubt that 
this victory significantly contributed to the eventual end of the 
Second World War.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask my colleagues to join me in honoring and 
remembering this great sacrifice and appreciating the advancement of 
freedom that came at such a high cost 70 years ago.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY



Name                                      Jurisdiction           Ownership %
----------------------------              ------------           -----------

Advanced Machine Programming, Inc.        Delaware               100%
Asyst Automation, Inc.                    Massachusetts          100%
Asyst Germany GmbH                        Germany                100%
Asyst Japan KK                            Japan                  95%
Asyst Korea Co., Ltd.                     Korea                  100%
Asyst Software, Inc.                      Delaware               100%
Asyst Technologies, Inc. (FSC)            Barbados               100%
Asyst Technologies (Far East) PTE, LTD    Singapore              100%
Asyst Technologies Malaysia Sd. Bhd.      Malaysia               100%
Asyst Technologies (Taiwan) Ltd.          Taiwan                 100%
Asyst Technologies (U.K.) Ltd.            United Kingdom         100%
GW Associates, Inc.                       Delaware               100%
Hine Design Incorporated                  California             100%
Palo Alto Technologies, Inc.              California             100%
Progressive System, Inc.                  Texas                  100%
Radiance Systems, Incorporated            California             100%
SemiFab, Inc.                             Delaware               100%
SMIF Equipment (Tianjen) Company, Ltd.    China                  100%

                                      1.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4289 

To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 

Act to repeal certain disclosure requirements related to coal and mine safety. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 7, 2017 

Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia (for himself and Mr. BARR) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to repeal certain disclosure requirements related to coal and mine safety. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF COAL AND MINE SAFETY DISCLO4 SURE REQUIREMENTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1503 of the Dodd-Frank 

6 Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (15 

7 U.S.C. 78m–2) is hereby repealed. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

9 in section 1(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4289 IH

1 Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.) is 

2 amended by striking the item relating to section 1503. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.
IN THE MATTER OF SKY WEST AIRLINES, INC. FAADOCKET NO. 2011-NM-06005 FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0777 

# RECEIVED MAY 07 2015 

## HEARING DOCKET

COMPLAINANT'S REQUEST FORAN EXTENSION OF TIME Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.233(c)(l), by agreement ofthe parties, Complainantrequests
an extension oftime to perfect its appeal and states the following in support: 1. OnApril22, 2015, Administrative LawJudge (ALJ) Richard C. Goodwin issued
an Initial Decision in the above-captioned matter. 2. OnApril29, 2015, Complainant filed a timely Notice ofAppeal. 3. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.233(c), Complainant mustperfect the appeal not later than June 11, 2015, whichis 50 days after the entry ofALJ Goodwin's Initial Decision. 4. Complainant's counsel has conferred with Respondent's counsel and the parties have agreedto extend the time period for perfecting the appeal by 30 days. WHEREFORE, Complainant respectfully requests the Decisiomnaker grant an extension oftime until July 10,2015 to perfect the appeal.
Respectfully submitted,Dated: May 7, 2015 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Telephone: (202) 267-5964 Facsimile: (202) 267-5106CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I served bypersonal delivery, the original and one copy ofthe foregoing Complainant's Request for an Extension ofTime in the matter ofSkyWest, Inc., FDMS NO. FAA2012-0777, addressed to: Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue SW Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl00 Washington, D.C., 20591 In addition, I hereby certifY that I served a copy ofthe same byU.S. Certified Mail, return receipt requested, addressed to: Todd Emerson, Esq. SkyWest Airlines 444 S. River Road St. George, UT 84790 Counsel for Respondent

Dated: May 7, 2015
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5537]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       AMERICA NEEDS A FARM BILL

  (Mr. WELCH asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. WELCH. Madam Speaker, America needs a farm bill. America needs a 
farm bill. Our ranchers, our agricultural conservation districts, our 
dairy farmers, our commodity farmers need and deserve a farm bill. It 
was passed by the Senate. It was passed by the House Agriculture 
Committee in a strong bipartisan vote. But for the first time, 
literally the first time in the history of this country, a farm bill 
passed by the Agriculture Committee is not being allowed to come to the 
floor. There's no excuse for that.
  Is it a hard job? Yes. But is that an excuse for Congress to duck its 
responsibility? No. Are there contentious issues? Yes.
  Some on the other side want to cut commodity programs. Give them a 
shot. Let them bring an amendment. My colleague, Rosa DeLauro, thinks 
we ought to restore all funding for nutrition. I agree. Give her a 
shot.
  Congress must do its job. It must bring a farm bill to the floor for 
a vote so that each and every one of us is held to account to our 
constituents.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5630]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mrs. MYRICK:
        H.R. 6264.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 with respect to the power of 
     Congress to make rules regarding the disposal of the property 
     of the United States.
```
# C_2010011EN.01000801.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/8

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 September 2009 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Naumburg, Germany) — Investitionsbank Sachsen-Anhalt — Anstalt der Norddeutschen Landesbank — Girozentrale v Bezirksrevisorin beim Landgericht Magdeburg für die Landeskasse des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt

(Joined Cases C-404/08 and C-409/08) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)

2010/C 11/13

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Naumburg, Germany

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Investitionsbank Sachsen-Anhalt — Anstalt der Norddeutschen Landesbank — Girozentrale

Applicants:

Defendant: Bezirksrevisorin beim Landgericht Magdeburg für die Landeskasse des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberlandesgericht Naumburg — Interpretation of Article 86 EC, in conjunction with Article 81(1)(a) and (d) and 81(2) EC — National rules granting exemption from court fees to an investment bank established by the Land

Operative part

Operative part

The references for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Naumburg made by decisions of 1 September 2008 and 2 September 2008 are manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 327 of 20.12.2008.

1

---
# C_2008107EN.01001701.xml

| 26.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/17

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom) made on 13 February 2008 — Vodafone Ltd, Telefónica O2 Europe plc, T-Mobile International AG, Orange Personal Communications Services Ltd v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform

(Case C-58/08)

(2008/C 107/25)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Vodafone Ltd, Telefónica O2 Europe plc, T-Mobile International AG, Orange Personal Communications Services Ltd

Applicants:

Defendants: Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform

Defendants:

Interested parties: Office of Communications, Hutchison 3G (UK) Limited

Interested parties:

Intervener: GSM Association

Intervener:

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Regulation (EC) No 717/2007 (1) invalid, in whole or in part, by reason of the inadequacy of Article 95 EC as a legal basis? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Regulation (EC) No 717/2007 (1) invalid, in whole or in part, by reason of the inadequacy of Article 95 EC as a legal basis?

1

| 2. | Is Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 717/2007 (together with Articles 2(a) and 6(3) insofar as they refer to the Eurotariff and obligations relating to the Eurotariff) invalid on the grounds that the imposition of a price ceiling in respect of retail roaming charges infringes the principle of proportionality and/or subsidiarity? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 717/2007 (together with Articles 2(a) and 6(3) insofar as they refer to the Eurotariff and obligations relating to the Eurotariff) invalid on the grounds that the imposition of a price ceiling in respect of retail roaming charges infringes the principle of proportionality and/or subsidiarity?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 717/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2007 on roaming on public mobile telephone networks within the Community and amending Directive 2002/21/EC (OJ L 171, p. 32).

1

---