alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020414EN.01001201.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha — Spain) — MO v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Toledo

(Case C-568/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Directive 2008/115/EC - Common standards and procedures for returning illegally staying third-country nationals - Article 6(1) and Article 8(1) - Illegal stay - National legislation providing for either a fine or removal, depending on the circumstances - Consequences of the judgment of 23 April 2015, Zaizoune (C-38/14, EU:C:2015:260) - National legislation more favourable to the interested party - Direct effect of directives - Limits)

(2020/C 414/14)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: MO

Defendant: Subdelegación del Gobierno en Toledo

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals must be interpreted as meaning that, where national legislation makes provision, in the event of a third-country national staying illegally in the territory of a Member State, for either a fine or removal, and the latter measure may be adopted only if there are aggravating circumstances concerning that national, additional to his or her illegal stay, the competent national authority may not rely directly on the provisions of that directive in order to adopt a return decision and to enforce that decision, even in the absence of such aggravating circumstances.

---

(1)  OJ C 363, 28.10.2019.

---
**Exhibit 32.(a).****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald R. Kimble, President of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                         /s/ Donald R. Kimble         Donald R. Kimble         (chief executive officer)      August 11, 2006
# Sullivan - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Northern Tier Regional Planning and Development Commission Executive Director Frank Thompson Email  &#105;&#x6e;&#x66;o&#64;&#x6e;o&#114;&#x74;&#x68;&#101;&#x72;&#x6e;t&#105;&#x65;r&#46;&#x6f;&#x72;&#103;The post Northern Tier Regional Planning and Development Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2010317EN.01003201.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/32

---

Order of the General Court of 27 September 2010 — Hidalgo v OHIM — Bodegas Hidalgo — La Gitana (HIDALGO)

(Case T-365/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Annulment of registration of the national mark which was the subject-matter of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2010/C 317/58

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Emilio Hidalgo SA (Jerez de la Frontera, Spain) (represented by: M. Esteve Sanz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Bodegas Hidalgo — La Gitana SA (Sanlucar de Barrameda, Spain) (represented by: S. Rivero Galán and J.M. Sanjuán de Coca, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 June 2008 (Case R 1329/2007-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Emilio Hidalgo SA and Bodegas Hidalgo — La Gitana SA.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Each of the parties is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each of the parties is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 272 of 25.10.2008.

1

---
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANTTOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alumina Limited, an Australian corporation (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year endedDecember 31, 2007 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: May 21, 2008
# C_2009141EN.01001602.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 April 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Nógrád Megyei Bíróság (Republic of Hungary)) — PARAT Automotive Cabrio Textiltetőket Gyártó Kft. v Adó- és Pénzügyi Elenőrzési Hivatal Hatósági Főosztály Észak-magyarországi Kihelyezett Hatósági Osztály

(Case C-74/08) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Accession of a new Member State - Tax on subsidised purchase of goods - Right to deduct - Exclusions laid down by national legislation at the time the Sixth Directive came into force - Member States’ option to retain exclusions))

2009/C 141/26

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Nógrád Megyei Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: PARAT Automotive Cabrio Textiltetőket Gyártó Kft.

Applicant:

Defendant: Adó- és Pénzügyi Ellenőrzési Hivatal Hatósági Főosztály Észak-magyarországi Kihelyezett Hatósági Osztály

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Nógrád Megyei Bíróság — Interpretation of Article 17 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — National legislation restricting the deductibility of the tax relating to the subsidised acquisition of equipment to the non-subsidised portion

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 17(2) and (6) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, must be interpreted to the effect that it precludes national legislation which in the case of acquisition of goods subsidised by public funds, allow the deduction of related VAT only up to the limit of the part of the costs of that acquisition that is not subsidised. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 17(2) and (6) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, must be interpreted to the effect that it precludes national legislation which in the case of acquisition of goods subsidised by public funds, allow the deduction of related VAT only up to the limit of the part of the costs of that acquisition that is not subsidised.

| 2. | Article 17(2) of the Sixth Directive confers on taxable persons rights on which they may rely before a national court to contest national rules that are incompatible with that Article. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 17(2) of the Sixth Directive confers on taxable persons rights on which they may rely before a national court to contest national rules that are incompatible with that Article.

---

(1)  OJ C 116, 9.5.2008.

1

---
# C_2009297EN.01001601.xml

| 5.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-30/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 96/82/EC - Article 11 - External emergency plans)

2009/C 297/19

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Sipos and P. Guerra e Andrade, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 11 of Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances (OJ 1997 L 10, p. 13), as amended by Directive 2003/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2003 L 345, p. 97) — Failure to draw up external emergency plans for certain establishments

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to ensure the implementation of the measures provided for under Article 11 of Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, as amended by Directive 2003/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2003, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that article; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to ensure the implementation of the measures provided for under Article 11 of Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, as amended by Directive 2003/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2003, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that article;

| 2. | orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 04.04.2009.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002 This certification is provided pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the annual report on Form
10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2004 of Craftmade
International, Inc.(the Company). I, James R. Ridings, the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company certify that, to my knowledge:  1.
    
    the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and2.
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
the Form 10-K. September 28, 2004
    
    /s/ James. R. Ridings
James R. Ridings
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K
pursuant to Item 601(b) (32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part
of the Form 10-K.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 108 (Wednesday, July 18, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H4911]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             H O U S E  O F  R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S

Vol. 158

WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JULY 18, 2012

No. 108
```
Amendment to Separation Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3(a) 
  
 

 
  
 July 20, 2004 
  
 Mr. Gary M. Spitz 
 225 Warrenton Drive 
 Houston, TX 77024 
  
 Re: Separation Agreement dated April 26, 2004, as amended pursuant to a Letter Agreement dated June 8, 2004 (“collectively referred to
as the “Agreement”),. 
  
 Dear Gary: 
  
 Pursuant to our conversation, the parties wish to amend the Agreement as follows: 

 
 Paragraph 1 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

  

	 	1.	You hereby agree to remain employed with the Company as Chief Financial Officer, with such duties and authority commensurate with that position as determined from time to time by
the Company’s Board of Directors, until August 31, 2004, or such earlier or later date that is mutually agreed to by you and the Company. You will resign from your positions as an officer and employee of the Company and all other direct and
indirect subsidiaries and affiliates of the Company as of August 31, 2004 (or such other earlier or later date that is mutually agreed to by you and the Company) (August 31, 2004 or such other date, the “Separation Date”).


  
 In consideration of your agreement to remain
employed with the Company until August 31, 2004, the Company agrees to: (i) pay you your regular salary for the month of August plus an additional one month salary of ($25,000) payable as soon as practicable (but in no event later than five (5)
business days following the Final Release Effective Date; (ii) pay the full cost of the your continuing medical coverage under COBRA through the earlier of: (a) August 31, 2005; or (b) the date the you obtain other medical coverage through another
employer; and (iii) allow you to maintain your current KRATON phone number 832.204.5421 for a period of six (6) months following your Separation Date. You acknowledge and agree to notify the Company immediately upon obtaining medical coverage though
another employer. You further acknowledge that in the event you are not employed with another company during the month of September, you will provide an additional seven (7) days of consulting 

  

 PO Box 61070 Houston, TX 77208-1070 
 700 Milam, North Tower, 13th Floor Houston, TX 77002









 
services to KRATON during the month of September to assist in transition matters to the new KRATON Chief Financial Officer. It is agreed that you will
provide these seven days of consulting at no additional consideration to KRATON. 
  
 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/    GEORGE GREGORY        
	George Gregory

  

	
	 Agreed and Accepted by:

	
	/s/    GARY M. SPITZ        
	Gary M. Spitz
# TABLE_LIST

# Table 1.1

# Table 2.1

# Table 2.2

# Table 3.1

# Table 3.2

# Table 4.1

# Table 4.2

# Table 5.1

# Table 5.2

# Table 5.3

# Table 5.4

# Table 5.5

# Table 5.6

# Table 5.7

# Table 6.1

# Table 6.2

# Table 7.1

# Table 7.2

# Table 7.3

# Table 7.4

# Table 7.5

# Table 8.1

# Table 8.2

# Table 9.1

# Table 9.2

# Table 10.1

# Table 10.2

# Table 11.1

# Table 11.2

# Table 11.3
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1490]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     IN HONOR OF CHARLES M. GERMANA

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 12, 2012

  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in honor of Charles M. 
``Chuck'' Germana, a member of the Cuyahoga County Council serving the 
Fourth District.
  In 1971, Councilman Germana began a career as an Independent 
Insurance Agent with the Four Star Insurance Agency in Parma, Ohio and 
has continued his work with the agency since then. He has been a 32-
year Board member, Treasurer, and two-time President of the Parma Area 
Chamber of Commerce. He has been an active member of the Northeast Ohio 
City Council Association having served as a Board member, Treasurer, 
Vice President and President. He is also actively involved in the Parma 
Hospital Health Care Foundation.
  Since being elected to the Cuyahoga County Council in 2010, 
Councilman Germana has been named the Chair of the Intergovernmental 
Relations and Collaboration Committee and has advocated for a charter 
government that inspires confidence in the electorate through an open, 
ethical, transparent and fair manner of holding all meetings and 
transactions.
  Mr. Speaker and colleagues, please join me in honoring Chuck Germana, 
a dedicated member of the Cuyahoga County Council.

                          ____________________
```
0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

Map Created: March 2011

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009 Population Estimates

Population change is the difference between the 2000 population 

estimates base and the 2009 population estimate expressed as 

a percentage of the 2000 population estimates base. 

Population Change in Appalachia, 2000–2009

(Population Change as a Percentage of the 2000 Population)

20.0% to 77.4%

10.0% to 19.9%

0.0% to 9.9%

-5.0% to -0.1%

-18.0% to -5.1%

Population Change

U.S. average = 9.1%

Appalachian average = 5.7%
7^ 

0 • •Aon'p 

Hh "2-

ARTMENT OF 

vSPORWio;-: 

ii? ;3 m 4:0 

John Speck 

P.O. Box 32 

St. Johns, Ml 48879 

i 

I
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ZBB Energy Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Scott W. Scampini, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to section Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ZBB Energy Corporation and will be retained by ZBB Energy
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





November
      15, 2010
              /s/  Scott W.
      ScampiniScott
      W. Scampini(Principal
      Financial Officer)
# C_2010234EN.01001201.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland)) — Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej

(Case C-99/09) (1)

1

(Telecommunication services - Directive 2002/22/EC - Article 30(2) - Portability of telephone numbers - Power of the national regulatory authorities - Direct charge to the subscriber - Disincentive - Taking costs into consideration)

2010/C 234/17

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa sp. z o.o.

Applicant:

Defendant: Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Sąd Najwyższy — Interpretation of Article 30(2) of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 51) — Portability of telephone numbers — Obligation on the national regulatory authority, when performing the obligation to ensure that the charge to be paid by consumers for use of the porting facility does not act as a disincentive, to take into account the costs incurred by mobile telephone operators in providing that facility

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 30(2) of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive) is to be interpreted as obliging the national regulatory authority to take account of the costs incurred by mobile telephone network operators in implementing the number portability service when it assesses whether the direct charge to subscribers for the use of that service is a disincentive. However, it retains the power to fix the maximum amount of that charge levied by operators at a level below the costs incurred by them, when a charge calculated only on the basis of those costs is liable to dissuade users from making use of the portability facility.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 6.6.2009.

1

---