alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SMM 2010 - EGCSA Workshop

SMM 2010

Hamburg, Germany

8

th & 9th September 2010

Don Gregory, Director EGCSA

SMM 2010 – EGCSA Workshop
Workshop Schedule

• EGCSA overview

• Couple Systems

• Aalborg Industries

• Q&A – 10 minutes

• MES

• Belco

• Hamworthy

• Q&A – 10 minutes

• Wartsila

• Clean Marine

• Q&A followed by refreshments & EGCSA Handbook

SMM 2010 – EGCSA Workshop
IMO - Adoption of EGCS

MEPC 59

• Guidelines for Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems adopted

– Wash water criteria to be reviewed in future

– Technology providers to collect samples, analyse & report to IMO

MEPC 60

• IMarEST submitted a pH amendment

• Norway submitted questions of validity of EGCS as

“equivalent”

• Chair of MEPC postponed both papers

SMM 2010 – EGCSA Workshop
IMO - Adoption of EGCS

MEPC 61

• United States submit response to Norway addressing

– Equivalence

– Technical changes

– Adequate provision for enforcement

– Postpone review until sufficient in service data available

• France submit response to Norway & IMarEST

– Equivalence in terms of environmental impact to be confirmed by

sample collection & analysis. Call on EGCSA to contribute

– Postpone review until sufficient data available

SMM 2010 – EGCSA Workshop
United States USCG & EPA

General Vessel Permit

• USA EPA have approved a GVP

– The permit relates to water quality and discharges from vessels

– Upon pre-application allows discharge of EGCS wash water in US

waters

Review of Guidelines for Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems

• USCG consulted with EPA regarding Guidelines

– EPA invited to comment on wash water criteria

– EPA responded that criteria robust & that EPA content with the

standard

SMM 2010 – EGCSA Workshop
European Regulators

EC Member States

• Several indicating that they are content with current

Guidelines

• Use of EGCS in port has so far not raised any objections

• Finland and Danish have approved an EGCS

SMM 2010 – EGCSA Workshop
Cost of compliance with low sulphur

Organisations in Baltic have raised concerns over cost of

compliance and written to the EC

• European Commission have rejected any changes to planned

legislation

• The arguments over cost did not consider EGCS as an option

• Today there are a range of EGCS solutions that meet needs of

both large and small vessels

SMM 2010 – EGCSA Workshop
THANK-YOU

Visit our website www.egcsa.com

SMM 2010 – EGCSA Workshop
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5774]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            FREE DR. AFRIDI

  (Mr. ROHRABACHER asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. ROHRABACHER. Madam Speaker, as we commemorate the monstrous crime 
committed against America on 
9/11, let us remember the plight of a heroic figure who helped us bring 
justice to those who murdered our fellow citizens on this day 11 years 
ago. I speak of Dr. Afridi, the man who risked his life to provide the 
intel our forces needed to locate and eliminate Osama Bin Laden, who 
now languishes in a jail in Pakistan.
  There has been no resolution through this Congress nor public effort 
by the United States government to support Dr. Afridi in this, his hour 
of need. He has been tortured. His family has been attacked, and he is 
still in a desperate situation.
  It behooves us as Americans to state in a unified and loud voice to 
his Pakistani captors, ``Dr. Afridi should be freed.'' The continued 
incarceration of Dr. Afridi affirms to all Americans that Pakistan is 
not our friend but instead is a partner in terrorism of especially 
those terrorists who are murdering our fellow Americans. Our motto 
today must be ``Free Dr. Afridi.''
  Dr. Afridi was asked why he risked his life to help in the efforts to 
bring Bin Laden to justice. His answer was that he respects and loves 
us, the American people.
  On this 9-11 commemoration we need to express our outrage that 
Pakistan has incarcerated and tortured this hero in the war against 
terrorists.
  Certainly, not one cent should ever be given to Pakistan in American 
aid, now that they're exposed for their evil terrorist deeds.
  Free Dr. Afridi should be our cry on this commemoration of 9-11.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2008301EN.01004602.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/46

---

Appeal brought on 10 September 2008 by Bart Nijs against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 26 June 2008 in Case F-1/08 Nijs v Court of Auditors

(Case T-376/08 P)

(2008/C 301/79)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Bart Nijs (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by F. Rollinger and A. Hertzog, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Court of Auditors of the European Communities

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

| — | Declare the appeal admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the appeal admissible;

| — | Declare the appeal well-founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the appeal well-founded;

| — | Consequently, annul the order of 26 June 2008 in Case F-1/08 Bart Nijs v Court of Auditors of the European Communities. |
| --- | --- |

—

Consequently, annul the order of 26 June 2008 in Case F-1/08 Bart Nijs v Court of Auditors of the European Communities.

Bart Nijs

Court of Auditors of the European Communities

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those raised in Case T-371/08 P.

---
# C_2008197EN.01003002.xml

| 2.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/30

---

Action brought on 4 June 2008 — Verhuizingen Coppens v Commission

(Case T-210/08)

(2008/C 197/53)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Verhuizingen Coppens NV (Bierbeek, Belgium) (represented by: J. Stuyck and I. Buelens, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Article 1 of the Commission Decision of 11 March 2008 in Case COMP/38.543 so far as concerns the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Article 1 of the Commission Decision of 11 March 2008 in Case COMP/38.543 so far as concerns the applicant;

| — | annul Article 2 of the Commission Decision of 11 March 2008 in Case COMP/38.543 so far as concerns the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 2 of the Commission Decision of 11 March 2008 in Case COMP/38.543 so far as concerns the applicant;

| — | in the alternative, reduce the fine and set it at an amount not exceeding 10 % of the applicant's turnover on the relevant market for international removal services; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, reduce the fine and set it at an amount not exceeding 10 % of the applicant's turnover on the relevant market for international removal services;

| — | in any event, order the Commission to pay the applicant's costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

in any event, order the Commission to pay the applicant's costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant's first two pleas in law seek the annulment of the Commission decision of 11 March 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC (Case COMP/38.543 — International removal services).

The applicant submits, first, that there is an infringement of Article 81(1) EC. The applicant was sanctioned for participation in a complex cartel even though, according to the Commission's file, the applicant differed from the other participants in that it was found only to have participated in a small part of the alleged cartel. Furthermore, the applicant's alleged participation in the cartel was shorter than was found by the Commission, and the Commission failed to take into account the relative weight of the applicant's participation in the cartel.

Second, the applicant submits that there is an infringement of Article 23(2) and (3) of Regulation 1/2003 (1), since the Commission incorrectly established both the duration and the continuing nature of the infringement.

1

In the alternative, the applicant seeks an exemption from the fine imposed or at least a drastic reduction in its amount on the ground that the basic amount of the fine was wrongly established and calculated and there was a manifest breach of the principle of proportionality when setting the fine.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1).

1

---
# Clay - Appalachian Regional Commission

- West Virginia University Research Corporation: Inspiring Hope in the Mountain State West Virginia,&#160;though improving in many measures,&#160;has the&#160;most drug overdose deaths&#160;per 100,000 people&#160;of any other&#160;state.&#160;Fortunately, the&#160;Mountain State&#160;also&#160;has an incredible host of ARC partners, local leaders,&#160;and community members committed&#160;to overcoming this challenge.&#160;This list includes&#160;West Virginia University Research Corporation and the Institute for Community and Rural Health (WVU ICRH),&#160;who together are using $500,000 from&#160;ARC’s&#160;INvestments&#160;Supporting Partnerships In Recovery Ecosystems [&#8230;]The post West Virginia University Research Corporation: Inspiring Hope in the Mountain State appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Region 3–B-C-K-P Regional Intergovernmental Council Executive Director Tyler Ferrell Email t&#121;&#108;&#x65;&#x72;f&#101;&#114;&#x72;&#x65;&#x6c;l&#64;&#119;&#x76;&#x72;eg&#105;&#x6f;&#x6e;&#x33;&#46;&#111;&#114;&#x67;The post Region 3–B-C-K-P Regional Intergovernmental Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1485]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               RECOGNIZING OVARIAN CANCER AWARENESS MONTH

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. DARRELL E. ISSA

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 12, 2012

  Mr. ISSA. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of tens of thousands 
of women and their families. In 2012, over 22,000 women will be 
diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Tragically, 15,500 will die from this 
disease. Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecological cancer among 
American women.
  This September, we recognize Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month, honoring 
those who have battled cancer--and those who continue to struggle with 
the disease. Their courage is an inspiration to all of us and a 
reminder that together, we can beat ovarian cancer.
  With early diagnosis, ovarian cancer is survivable. Over 95% of women 
who detect ovarian cancer during the early stages of the disease defeat 
the disease. By learning the symptoms, checking their family histories 
and visiting with their doctors, women can detect ovarian cancer before 
it's too late.
  No one and no family should have to face ovarian cancer without the 
knowledge necessary to detect and defeat it. Along with my fellow 
Congressmen and citizens, I am proud to have helped fight ovarian 
cancer. In 2005, I joined my colleagues to create a federal educational 
campaign for gynecological cancer, urging the Center for Disease 
Control and the Office of Women's Health to cooperate with non-profits 
to raise cancer awareness among women and health practitioners.
  That year, I also successfully introduced Johanna's Law. In memory of 
Johanna Silver, who lost her life to cancer after a three and a half 
month battle with ovarian cancer, Johanna's Law has helped increase 
awareness of gynecological cancers.
  I urge all members to recognize and remember Ovarian Cancer Awareness 
Month and the impact of cancer upon our community.

                          ____________________
```
# Swain - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Creating PPE for Nurses and School Officials in Western North Carolina STEMwork in western North Carolina (WNCSTEMwork) is a teacher professional development initiative of the Kenan Institute for Engineering, Technology, and Science at North Carolina State University. With ARC support, this program supports six middle and high school teachers from ten counties as they develop their capacity to lead and sustain STEM workforce education. In April [&#8230;]The post Creating PPE for Nurses and School Officials in Western North Carolina appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Southwestern Commission Executive Director Sarah Thompson Email &#115;&#97;&#x72;a&#104;&#x40;&#x72;e&#103;&#x69;&#x6f;n&#97;&#x2e;&#x6f;r&#103;The post Southwestern Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2011089EN.01001502.xml

| 19.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Cantiere Navale De Poli v Commission

(Case T-584/08) (1)

1

(State aid - Temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding - Alteration planned by the Italian authorities to an aid scheme previously authorised by the Commission - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market)

2011/C 89/34

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cantiere Navale De Poli SpA (Venice, Italy) (represented initially by: A. Abate and R. Longanesi Cattani, and subsequently by A. Abate and A. Franchi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Righini, C. Urraca Caviedes and V. Di Bucci, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2010/38/EC of 21 October 2008 on State aid C-20/08 (ex N 62/08) which Italy is planning to implement through a modification of scheme N 59/04 concerning a temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding (OJ 2010 L 17, p. 50).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Cantiere Navale De Poli SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Cantiere Navale De Poli SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our reports dated February 25, 2002 except with respect to the
matter discussed in the fourth paragraph of Note 4, as to which the date is
March 27, 2002, appearing on pages F-1 and S-1 of this Form 10-K, into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 33-76108, 33-90892,
333-3020, 33-37113, 333-72053, 333-51102, 333-51104 and 333-62440.

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 27, 2002
# Wolfe - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Kentucky River Area Development District Executive Director Michelle Allen Email &#109;&#x69;&#99;&#x68;e&#x6c;l&#101;&#x40;&#107;&#x72;a&#x64;d&#46;&#x6f;&#114;&#x67;The post Kentucky River Area Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Memorandum Agreement










 

Exhibit
10ff

 

MEMORANDUM
AGREEMENT

 

April
22, 2004

 

To:  C. R.
Palmer, Chairman of the Executive Committee and Director

 

From:        
 The Board
of Directors

 

Re:  Outline
of Duties and Compensation

 

This
Agreement supercedes the Letter Agreement, dated May 14, 2003, and effective May
1, 2003, between C. R. Palmer and the Rowan Compensation Committee.

 

Title

 

The Board
of Rowan wishes you to accept, for life, the honorary title of “Chairman
Emeritus.”

 

Industry
Affairs

 

You shall
continue your involvement with all organizations listed below. During this time,
you will use your best efforts to transition D. F. McNease into these
organizations where he is not already involved.

 

American
Bureau of Shipping (ABS)

 

American
Petroleum Institute (API)

 

National
Petroleum Council (NPC)

 

National
Ocean Industries Association (NOIA)

 

International
Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC)

 

Compensation
and Benefits

 

1.  As long
as you remain a director, the stock option grant of 150,000 shares dated April
25, 2003, will continue to vest annually in accordance with the original
schedule.

 

2.  You will
continue to have the use of your current office and secretary, until you have
made satisfactory arrangements to move your office to another building suitable
to you. You have told us that you expect this move to be accomplished by Fall
2004. At the time of such move, Rowan will pay all moving expenses, and begin
paying an allowance of up to $100,000 per year for office space and a secretary
(who may be an employee of Rowan), for so long as you remain a director of
Rowan.

 

3.  Your
compensation otherwise will be the same as for other non-employee members of the
Board of Directors of Rowan.

 

Other

 

1.  For so
long as you remain a director, you will continue to have access to and
reasonable personal use of company personnel, consistent with the scope and
extent with which you have used such company personnel in the past 12 months.
You will also have reasonable use of the Company’s entertainment facilities on a
space-available basis. The Company is to be reimbursed at a rate approximating
the incremental cash cost of such goods and services for any non-business use of
the entertainment facilities.

 

2.  For so
long as you remain a director of Rowan, you and Mrs. Palmer shall remain
directors of the Rowan subsidiary that owns Aberuchill.

 

3.  For so
long as you remain a director, you will have the use of corporate aircraft on an
“if available” basis, and will reimburse the Company for such use at the
estimated variable costs of using such aircraft (approximately 1.25 x fuel
costs).

 

4.  For so
long as you remain a director, you shall be reimbursed for all reasonable
business-related expenses, excluding club membership dues, subject to review and
approval of the Board from time to time.

 

 




/s/
Henry O. Boswell 

On behalf
of the Board










/s/ C.
R. Palmer 

C. R.
Palmer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1493-E1494]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           NASHVILLE SOFTBALL

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. JOHN SHIMKUS

                              of illinois

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 12, 2012

  Mr. SHIMKUS. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to salute the achievements of 
the Nashville Hornettes softball team, which earlier this month brought 
home its second state championship.
  The Hornettes put together a stellar 35-4 season this year, swept 
through the regional and the sectional, and knocked off two of the 
state's top teams at the state finals in order to claim the title. I 
want to congratulate Coach Dempsey Witte, who led this team to the 
title in only his second year as head coach, as well as his assistants: 
Wayne Harre, Charlie Heck, Bethany Hinkle and Jordan Farris. I 
especially want to extend my congratulations to the members of the 2012 
Hornettes state championship softball team who worked so hard all year 
to achieve this goal: Alana Czajkowski, Emily Thompson, Mollie 
Borowiak, Jordi Harre, Lauren O'Daniell, Hannah Yung, Nellie Snead, 
Nicole Deering, Kiley Pelker, Abbi Liske, Daley Buchanan, Briah 
Winchester, Maci Ingram and Shaye Harre.

[[Page E1494]]

  These student-athletes, and their coaches, have represented 
themselves, their school and their community in a first-rate fashion, 
and I join with the other Members of this House in congratulating them, 
and wishing them all the best in their future academic and athletic 
endeavors.

                          ____________________
```
#### CUTRIGHT et al. v. RICHEY et al.

No. 35287.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 6, 1952.

See also, 257 P.2d 286.

Ralph D. Smith, Cordell, for plaintiffs in error.

Jones & Wesner, Cordell, for defendants in error and cross-appellants.

WELCH, Justice.

This action was commended by W. S. Richey and Eunice Richey, husband and wife, to quiet title to a mineral interest in thirty acres of land' in Washita County. The court after a trial without a jury entered its order and judgment finding various-interests in the property and. from this judgment Ruhl K. Cutright and Martha Cutright appealed and filed their petition in error with case-made attached on October 9, 1951.

W. S. Richey and Eunice Richey filed a cross-petition in error in this court November 3, 1951. 'A motion to dismiss has been, filed for the reason that the cross-petition in error was not filed within three months from the date the order overruling the motion for new trial was filed, to wit, August 2, 1951. The motion must Ibe sustained.

Where cross-petition in error is not filed in this court until after the expiration of the time fixed for appeal this court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter and the appeal will be dismissed. Bilby v. Bilby, 127 Okl. 9, 251 P. 6,11; Haygood v. Pinkey, 112 Okl. 30, 239 P. 456, and Wolfe v. Graham, 181 Okl. 379, 74 P.2d 119. In Wolfe v. Graham, supra, it is stated:

> “ ‘Where a cross-petition in error is not filed in this court until after the expiration of six months from the date of the final judgment or order complained of, this court has no jurisdic*286tion over the subject-matter and the cross appeal will be dismissed.’ Bilby v. Bilby, 127 Old. 9, 251 P. 611.”

12 O.S.1951 § 972 provides that the appeal must be taken within three months from the date of the rendition o'f the judgment or final order complained of unless within said three months time is extended in which to perfect the appeal.

It is admitted that the petition in error on cross-appeal was not filed until the 3rd day of November, 1,951, but in the response to the motion to dismiss it is stated that the cross-petitioners placed in the Post Office at Cordell, Oklahoma, on November 1, 1951, said cross-petition in error addressed properly and that in the due course of mail the cross-petition should have reached the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court within time.

In Home Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Rounds-Porter Lumber Co., 80 Okl. 201, 195 P. 479, it is stated:.

> “Inclosing a petition in error in an envelope addressed to the clerk of this court, with postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States mail within time to reach the office of the clerk oif this court, is not a compliance with the statute.”

Appeal dismissed,

HALLEY, V. C. J., and CORN, GIBSON, DAVISO'N, JOHNSON, O’NEAL and BINGAMAN, JJ., concur.