alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4581 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop 

best practices for utilizing advanced passenger information and passenger name record data for counterterrorism screening and vetting operations, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4581 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Screening and Vetting 

3 Passenger Exchange Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PASSENGER SCREENING BEST PRACTICES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Home7 land Security shall develop best practices for utilizing ad8 vanced passenger information and passenger name record 

9 data for counterterrorism screening and vetting oper10 ations. 

11 (b) CONSIDERATIONS.—The Secretary of Homeland 

12 Security shall, to the greatest extent practicable— 

13 (1) make available to certain countries, includ14 ing visa waiver program countries under section 217 

15 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

16 1187), the best practices required under subsection 

17 (a); and 

18 (2) provide assistance to such countries in im19 plementing such best practices. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 9, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4581 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to 

operations, and for other purposes. data for counterterrorism screening and vetting senger information and passenger name record develop best practices for utilizing advanced pas-
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of IPC Holdings,
Ltd.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 333-128905 and No. 333-133605 on Form S-3 and registration
statements No. 333-107052, No. 333-126434 and No. 333-149118 on Form S-8 of IPC Holdings, Ltd. of our reports dated February 22, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of IPC Holdings, Ltd. as of December 31,
2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and all related financial
statement schedules, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of IPC Holdings, Ltd..



|                 
|-----------------
|/s/ KPMG         
|Hamilton, Bermuda
|February 22, 2008
#### Henry Harvey, Respondent, v Martin Zampieri, Individually and Doing Business as M & Z Market, Defendant, and Ingrid Zampieri, Appellant.

— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs complaint alleges causes of action in false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution based upon defendant’s identification of him from photographs as one of the persons who participated in a robbery of the store at which defendant worked. Plaintiff was arrested and spent a week in jail. The charges were ultimately dismissed.

The court erred by denying summarily defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint or, in the alternative, to be relieved of her default. Defendant submitted an affidavit denying that she was personally served with a summons and plaintiff presented an affidavit of the process server indicating that he served the summons upon defendant. Where, as here, defendant presents a sworn statement denying personal service, it is well settled that the jurisdictional issue cannot be resolved upon affidavits alone *(see, Cadin Contr. v Rich Agency,*158 AD2d 442; *Frankel v Schilling,*149 AD2d 657, 659; *Adames v New York City Tr. Auth.,*126 AD2d 462; *Cranesville Block Co. v Carpenter,*88 AD2d 1015). Consequently, we remit the matter to Supreme Court to hold a hearing to determine whether personal service was effected.

Should Supreme Court determine that personal service was effected upon defendant, we conclude, based upon our review of the record, that defendant should be relieved of her default. Defendant provided a reasonable excuse for the default, the delay was not excessive, and defendant’s sworn assertions that she identified plaintiff in good faith and without malice demonstrate a meritorious defense to the allegations of the complaint *(see, Reeves v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.,*117 AD2d 789, *lv dismissed*68 NY2d 803; *Steams v New York City Tr. Auth.,*24 Misc 2d 216, 217, *affd*12 AD2d 451). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Curran, J.— Vacate Default Judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 29, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby                           ( print page 90219)                        gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 22, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage*                    ®                     *Contract 39 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-135, CP2024-141.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-28730 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4467 

To require the Federal Air Marshal Service to utilize risk-based strategies, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 28, 2017 

Mr. JODY B. HICE of Georgia (for himself, Mr. KATKO, and Mr. MCCAUL) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Air Marshal Service to utilize riskbased strategies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening Aviation 

5 Security Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. USE OF RISK-BASED STRATEGIES BY FEDERAL AIR 

7 MARSHAL SERVICE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 44917 

9 of title 49, United States Code, is amended— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4467 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘and’’ after 

2 the semicolon at the end; 

3 (2) in paragraph (8), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting a semicolon; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

6 paragraphs: 

7 ‘‘(9) shall require the Federal Air Marshal 

8 Service to utilize a risk-based strategy when allo9 cating resources between international and domestic 

10 flight coverage, including when initially setting its 

11 annual target numbers of average daily international 

12 and domestic flights to cover; 

13 ‘‘(10) shall require the Federal Air Marshal 

14 Service to utilize a risk-based strategy to support 

15 domestic allocation decisions; and 

16 ‘‘(11) shall require the Federal Air Marshal 

17 Service to utilize a risk-based strategy to support 

18 international allocation decisions.’’. 

19 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 270 days after the date 

20 of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the 

21 Transportation Security Administration shall submit to 

22 the Committee on Homeland Security and the Committee 

23 on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of 

24 Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security 

25 and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report that deVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:36 Nov 30, 2017 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4467.IH H4467

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4467 IH

1 scribes the compliance of the Federal Air Marshal Service 

2 with the requirements specified in paragraphs (9) through 

3 (11) of subsection (a) of section 44917 of title 49, United 

4 States Code, as added by this Act, and the documented 

5 methodology used by the Federal Air Marshal Service to 

6 conduct risk assessments in accordance with such para7 graphs. 

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The Transportation Security 

9 Administration shall begin carrying out the requirements 

10 specified in paragraphs (9) through (11) of subsection (a) 

11 of section 44917, United States Code, added by this Act, 

12 by not later than the date that is 180 days after the date 

13 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5296]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  0910
                    CONDEMNING ALEXANDER LUKASHENKO

  (Mr. TURNER of New York asked and was given permission to address the 
House for 1 minute.)
  Mr. TURNER of New York. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to express my 
concern that Alexander Lukashenko, president of Belarus, continues to 
rule over Europe's last dictatorship. Despite continued promises of 
reform, Lukashenko continues to deny the people of Belarus their basic 
freedoms and human rights, and runs the country as a authoritarian 
dictatorship.
  In fact, after Mr. Lukashenko's fraudulent election in 2010, 700 
political opponents and activists were arrested during demonstrations. 
This is just one example of the type of persecution the people of 
Belarus have been subjected to in these past 18 years. Lukashenko's 
total disregard for the people he swore to protect is appalling, 
alarming, and should not be tolerated.
  I'm here today to draw attention to this matter and publicly condemn 
Lukashenko and his regime for their continuing oppression of the people 
of Belarus, and offer my support for the country's civilians and pro-
democracy forces.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5708]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. FITZPATRICK:
       H.R. 6281.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 1
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5764]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    TIME LIMITATION OF REFERRED BILL

  Pursuant to clause 2 of rule XII, the following action was taken by 
the Speaker:

       H.R. 1974. Referral to the Committee on House 
     Administration extended for a period ending not later than 
     October 1, 2012.

                          ____________________
```
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-05-456-CV

IN THE MATTER OF J.A.

	----------

	FROM THE 323RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellant’s “Notice Of Non-Suit,” which we will treat  as a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal.  It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).  

									PER CURIAM

PANEL D: WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DELIVERED:  March 30, 2006
#### In the Matter of Alfred A. Iaboni et al., Respondents, v Carolee Sunderland et al., Respondents, and Anthony J. La Manna et al., Appellants.

— In a proceeding, *inter alia,*to invalidate a petition designating George L. Preston, Jr., Anthony J. La Manna, and Keith M. Preston as candidates in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 12, 1991, for the party position of Member of the Democratic County Committee of Westchester County, in the 88th Assembly District, the appeal is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Burrows, J.), entered August 7, 1991, as granted the application as to those individuals.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts, without costs or disbursements, so much of the application as was to invalidate the petition designating George L. Preston, Jr., Anthony J. La Manna, and Keith M. Preston is denied, the proceeding insofar as brought against those individuals is dismissed, and the Board of Elections of the County of Westchester is directed to place the names of George L. Preston, Jr., Anthony J. La Manna, and Keith M. Preston on the appropriate ballot.

We conclude that the petitioners have failed to sustain their burden of proving that the challenged subscribing witnesses George L. Preston, Jr., and Anthony J. La Manna do not reside at the Mount Vernon addresses which they listed in the petition designating them, as well as Keith M. Preston, as candidates *(see, Matter of Boyland v Board of Elections,*104 AD2d 463). Contrary to the findings of the Supreme Court, we conclude that both of these subscribing witnesses have maintained "legitimate, significant and continuing” attachments to their respective Mount Vernon residences for many years *(Matter of Ferguson v McNab,*60 NY2d 598, 600; *see, Matter of Gallagher v Dinkins,*32 NY2d 839; *Matter of Umland v Board of Elections,*143 AD2d 240). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Harwood, Balletta and Copertino, JJ., concur.
# Asset-Based Development - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Strengthening Economic Resilience in Appalachia This study defines and quantifies economic resilience in order to understand the underlying factors that allow communities to buffer economic shocks.The post Strengthening Economic Resilience in Appalachia appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Agriculture and Food System Trends in the Appalachian Region: 2007-2012 This report examines trends in the 2007 and 2012 Censuses of Agriculture and related socioeconomic databases in order to assess, benchmark, and document food and farm activity and the local food economy in the Appalachian Region.The post Agriculture and Food System Trends in the Appalachian Region: 2007-2012 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Assessing the Landscape of Local Food in Appalachia This report examines the burgeoning local food movement in the Appalachian Region, describes best practices, and analyzes gaps and opportunities for expanding this sector of the economy.The post Assessing the Landscape of Local Food in Appalachia appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Sources of Regional Growth in Non-Metro Appalachia The Sources of Growth project is part of a series of research efforts funded by the Appalachian Regional Commission to improve understanding of factors affecting economic growth in rural and distressed areas.The post Sources of Regional Growth in Non-Metro Appalachia appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
##### 



Exhibit 10.48
 ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
 
 RECITALS
 Whereas
 Whereas
 Whereas
 Now, Therefore
 AGREEMENT
 Services to the Corporation.
 Indemnity.




---



##### 



3. Limitations on Indemnity.
            2




---



##### 



Continuation of Indemnity.
 Notification and Defense of Claim.
   3




---



##### 



Expenses.
 Determination by the Corporation.
     Enforcement by Arbitration Only.
 4




---



##### 



Subrogation.
 Non-Exclusivity of Rights.
 Survival of Rights.
   Separability.
 Governing Law.
 Amendment and Termination.
 Identical Counterparts.
 Headings.
 Notices.
 5




---



##### 



a.
    
    if to Indemnitee, at the address indicated below Indemnitees signature
hereunder (or such last address provided by Indemnitee to the Corporation).b.
    
    if to the Corporation, toAsyst Technologies, Inc.
46897 Bayside Parkway
Fremont, CA 94538
Attn: Chief Executive Officer
          General Counsel
   ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.By:Stephen S. SchwartzChief Executive OfficerChairman of the Board of DirectorsINDEMNITEEAddress:
 6
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1453]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    IN HONOR OF THE HUNGARIAN SCOUTS

                                  _____
                                 

                        HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                       Monday, September 10, 2012

  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in honor of the Hungarian 
Scouts.
  The first Hungarian Scout group to form in the United States was 
founded in Cleveland, Ohio in 1951. By the fall of that year, two 
troops, one East side and one West side, had formed and registered with 
the Boy Scouts of America. In 1952, the Hungarian Scouts expanded and 
formed a girls' troop. By 1957, the girls' troop had also split into 
two groups located in the same neighborhoods as the boys' East and West 
side versions.
  In 1973, the Hungarian Scout Folk Ensemble was created in order to 
study Hungarian culture and teach it the Hungarian youth. The Ensemble 
aims to preserve dying folk arts of the Hungarians in the Carpathian 
basin and pass them on to the public and future generations. Their 
performances include lively song, dance, and music accompanied by true-
to-culture costumes.
  Each year the Hungarian Scout Folk Ensemble performs at the Hungarian 
Festival held in the Greater Cleveland area during Labor Day weekend. 
This year marks the 57th annual festival. Celebrations begin on Sunday, 
September 2nd with a twelve o'clock Hungarian mass followed by the 
opening of the kitchens at one o'clock serving traditional Hungarian 
fare such as goulash, chicken papriakas and dumplings, and a variety of 
pastries. Throughout the day events include soccer matches, free animal 
programs, challenging children's games, folk art presentations and 
authentic Hungarian music capped off by the performance of the 
Hungarian Scout Folk Ensemble.
  Mr. Speaker and colleagues, please join me in honoring the Hungarian 
Scouts.

                          ____________________
```
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4564 

To require a threat assessment on current foreign terrorist fighter activities, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2017 

Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana (for himself, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. KATKO, Mr. GALLAGHER, Mr. RUTHERFORD, and Mr. FITZPATRICK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To require a threat assessment on current foreign terrorist 

fighter activities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Post-Caliphate Threat 

5 Assessment Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. THREAT ASSESSMENT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Homeland Secu8 rity, in coordination with the Secretary of State and Direc9 tor of National Intelligence, shall conduct a threat assessVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:09 Dec 12, 2017 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4564.IH H4564

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4564 IH

1 ment of current foreign terrorist fighter activities. Such 

2 assessment shall include the following: 

3 (1) A detailed summary of current foreign ter4 rorist fighter travel and trends, including countries 

5 of origin, travel destinations, and means of travel. 

6 (2) An analysis of any country or region with 

7 a significant increase in foreign terrorist fighter ac8 tivity. 

9 (3) An analysis of foreign terrorist fighter trav10 el trends in and out of Iraq and Syria. 

11 (b) CONGRESSIONAL COMMUNICATION.—Not later 

12 than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

13 the Secretary of Homeland Security shall report to the 

14 Committee on Homeland Security, the Committee on For15 eign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on In16 telligence of the House of Representatives and the Com17 mittee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, 

18 the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Com19 mittee on Intelligence of the Senate on the threat assess20 ment required under subsection (a). 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2010179EN.01003401.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/34

---

Order of the General Court of 19 May 2010 — Arbeitsgemeinschaft Golden Toast v OHIM (Golden Toast)

(Case T-163/08) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark Golden Toast - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2010/C 179/57)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Golden Toast e.V. (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Späth and G. Hasselblatt, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 January 2008 (Case R 761/2007-1) relating to an application to register the word sign Golden Toast as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

The Court

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Golden Toast e.V. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Golden Toast e.V. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 5.7.2008.

---