alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5824-S5825]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 CORRECTING THE ENROLLMENT OF H.R. 1627

  Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate 
proceed to the immediate consideration of S. Con. Res. 55, which was 
submitted earlier today by Senator Harkin.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The clerk 
will report.
  The bill clerk read as follows:

       A concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 55) directing the 
     House of Representatives to make a correction in the 
     enrollment of H.R. 1627.

  There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the 
concurrent resolution.
  Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the 
concurrent resolution be agreed to, the motion to reconsider be 
considered made and laid upon the table, with no intervening action or 
debate, and that any statements relating to the measure be printed in 
the Record.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 55) was agreed to, as 
follows:

                            S. Con. Res. 55

       Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 
     concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 1627) 
     an Act to amend title 38, United States Code, to furnish 
     hospital care and medical services to veterans

[[Page S5825]]

     who were stationed at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, while the 
     water was contaminated at Camp Lejeune, to improve the 
     provision of housing assistance to veterans and their 
     families, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of 
     Representatives shall make the following correction: in 
     section 201, strike ``Andrew Connelly'' and insert ``Andrew 
     Connolly''.

     

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc.:



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 33-37855 on Form S-8;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-19215 on Form S-8;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-93773 on Form S-8;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-53531 on Form S-8;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-75742 on Form S-8;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-75744 on Form S-8;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-113945 on Form S-8;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-124677 on Form S-8;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 33-57920 on Form S-3;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 33-133854 on Form S-8;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-142615 on Form S-8;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-150807 on Form S-8;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-151942 on Form S-8;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-159077 on Form S-8;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-166654 on Form S-8;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-174170 on Form S-8;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-181521 on Form S-8;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-188675 on Form S-8; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-189696 on Form S-3
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated February 20, 2014 relating to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. and the effectiveness of Potash
Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc.s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2013.

/s/ Deloitte LLP

Chartered Accountants

Saskatoon, Canada

February 27, 2014
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1400]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

     DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAIN-CAPABLE UNBORN CHILD PROTECTION ACT

                                 ______
                                 

                               speech of

                          HON. SHELLEY BERKLEY

                               of nevada

                    in the house of representatives

                         Tuesday, July 31, 2012

  Ms. BERKLEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to H.R. 3803, the 
District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. Although 
nine other states have passed similar abortion bans, this is the first 
attempt to pass a law of this kind on a federal level. However, even 
the nine state laws include at least a narrow exception to protect 
women's health. This bill unfairly singles out the District of 
Columbia, but more importantly it lacks any health exceptions to the 
ban. Pregnancy can become dangerous, sometimes even life-threatening. 
This bill fails to provide women with necessary health exceptions to 
save their lives or their ability to have children in the future.
  In addition to not protecting women who are pregnant, H.R. 3803 fails 
to provide exceptions in instances of rape or incest, even when it 
involves young girls. About 25,000 women become pregnant due to rape 
each year and about 30 percent of rape cases involve women under 18. 
This bill falls short in providing the necessary protections for these 
women.
  I would have voted against H.R. 3803. Unfortunately my plane was 
delayed due to weather coming in to Washington, DC, causing me to miss 
the vote. I have been a strong supporter for women's health in the past 
and I plan to continue to do so.

                          ____________________
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 89488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28568]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from the 
Utah Inland Port Authority (WB23-72--12/20/23) for permission to use 
select data from the Board's annual 2021 masked Carload Waybill Sample. 
A copy of this request may be obtained from the Board's website under 
Docket No. WB23-72.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics 
within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for 
release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Alexander Dusenberry, (202) 245-0319.

Brendetta Jones,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2023-28568 Filed 12-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
# Gilmer - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Northwest Georgia Regional Commission Executive Director Boyd Austin Email &#x62;&#97;&#117;&#x73;&#x74;&#105;&#110;&#x40;&#x6e;&#119;&#103;&#x72;&#x63;&#46;&#111;&#x72;&#x67;The post Northwest Georgia Regional Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlton Williams, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Goodman, J.), rendered October 13, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the County Court erred by denying his request for an instruction on the defense of agency *(see, People v Roche,*45 NY2d 78, *cert denied*436 US 958; *People v Lam Lek Chong,*45 NY2d 64, 75, *cert denied*439 US 935) is without merit. Although an undercover officer initiated the transaction by inquiring of the defendant as to whether he had any drugs, the defendant both vouched for the quality of his product and directed a cohort to turn over the *274drugs and accept the money *(see, People v Perez,*154 AD2d 628; *People v Quinones,*150 AD2d 399). There is thus no evidence which suggests that the defendant was a mere instrumentality of the undercover officer *(see, People v Argibay,*45 NY2d 45, 54, *cert denied sub nom. Hahn-DiGuiseppe v New York,*439 US 930; *People v Carter,*151 AD2d 688; *People v Linden,*150 AD2d 801).

Also without merit is the defendant’s claim that he was denied a fair trial because of alleged attempts by the prosecutor on summation to instruct the jury on the law. The defense counsel’s objections to the two instances cited were immediately sustained, the alleged attempts were unsuccessful, and defendant made no request for curative instructions or any other relief. We conclude that the alleged errors were corrected to the defendant’s satisfaction *(see, People v Santiago,*52 NY2d 865; *People v Reid,*140 AD2d 639, 640-641; *see also, People v Carter, supra).*Further, there are no circumstances which suggest that defendant’s concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years imprisonment, which were far less than the maximum which could be imposed *(see,*Penal Law § 70.06), constituted a penalty for exercising his right to proceed to trial *(see, People v Pena,*50 NY2d 400, 411-412, *cert denied*449 US 1087; *People v Reid, supra,*at 641), and we conclude that the sentences imposed were neither harsh nor excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1381-E1382]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

    RECOGNIZING RADIOLOGISTS AND THE INTERNATIONAL DAY OF RADIOLOGY

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. PETE SESSIONS

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                       Wednesday, August 1, 2012

  Mr. SESSIONS. Mr. Speaker, I rise to recognize the International Day 
of Radiology, and

[[Page E1382]]

draw attention to the important contribution that radiology, in 
particular diagnostic imaging, serves in the health care delivery 
system. International Day of Radiology is observed annually on November 
8th, an important date in the history of radiology. On that day in 
1895, Professor Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen discovered x-rays. Radiology 
will be celebrated by many groups including the American College of 
Radiology, the Radiological Society of North America, and the European 
Society of Radiology.
  Radiologists (physicians with special training in the use of imaging 
including x-rays), Radiation Oncologists (physicians trained to treat 
cancers with radiation alone or in combination with surgery and/or 
chemotherapy), and the medical imaging community have made significant 
contributions to modern medicine, providing powerful tools for clinical 
diagnosis, decision making, and treatment of disease. Over the last 30 
years, medical imaging tools have been among the most sophisticated and 
cutting-edge technologies developed for patient care. During that span 
we have seen consistent decreases in cancer mortality rates with 
corresponding increases in American life expectancy.
  The U.S. National Academy of Engineering recognized the tremendous 
contribution of medical imaging exams when it ranked imaging among the 
20 greatest engineering achievements of the twentieth century. 
Practicing physicians surveyed in a 2001 Health Affairs study ranked 
Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) number 
one among the top 30 recent medical innovations. Perhaps most telling, 
the New England Journal of Medicine named medical imaging one of the 
top 10 medical advances of the last 1,000 years.
  A 2009 National Bureau of Economic Research study found that 
individuals with greater access to imaging scans live longer. 
Diagnostic imaging services have enabled patients to avoid several 
types of expensive and invasive procedures. Imaging scans cost less 
than surgeries and reduce the number of unnecessary hospital admissions 
and length of hospital stays. As such, medical imaging serves an 
important role in containing the cost of health care in the United 
States.
  With its impact on patients' health, I'm pleased to recognize the 
importance of diagnostic imaging and radiation oncology, and call 
attention to November 8th as the International Day of Radiology.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2008301EN.01004601.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/46

---

Appeal brought on 10 September 2008 by Bart Nijs against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 26 June 2008 in Case F-108/07 Nijs v Court of Auditors

(Case T-375/08 P)

(2008/C 301/78)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Bart Nijs (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by F. Rollinger and A. Hertzog, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Court of Auditors of the European Communities

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

| — | Declare the appeal admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the appeal admissible;

| — | Declare the appeal well-founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the appeal well-founded;

| — | Consequently, annul the order of 26 June 2008 in Case F-108/07 Bart Nijs v Court of Auditors of the European Communities. |
| --- | --- |

—

Consequently, annul the order of 26 June 2008 in Case F-108/07 Bart Nijs v Court of Auditors of the European Communities.

Bart Nijs

Court of Auditors of the European Communities

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those raised in Case T-371/08 P.

---
# C_2008223EN.01004602.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/46

---

Action brought on 12 June 2008 — Iranian Tobacco v OHIM — AD Bulgartabac (Bahman)

(Case T-223/08)

(2008/C 223/81)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Iranian Tobacco Company (Teheran, Iran) (represented by: M. Beckensträter, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: AD Bulgartabac Holding (Sofia, Bulgaria)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Forms of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 10 April 2008 — R 709/2007-1, notified on 15 April 2008; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 10 April 2008 — R 709/2007-1, notified on 15 April 2008;

| — | Order AD Bulgartabac Holding to pay the reimbursable costs, including those of the main proceedings and including those of the defendant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order AD Bulgartabac Holding to pay the reimbursable costs, including those of the main proceedings and including those of the defendant;

| — | In the alternative, while annulling the decision of 10 April 2008 and that of 7 March 2007 — 1415C — declare that the application by AD Bulgartabac Holding of 8 November 2005 was inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, while annulling the decision of 10 April 2008 and that of 7 March 2007 — 1415C — declare that the application by AD Bulgartabac Holding of 8 November 2005 was inadmissible.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which revocation was applied for: the figurative mark ‘Bahman’ for goods in Class 34 (Community trade mark No 427 336).

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which revocation was applied for:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Iranian Tobacco Company.

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant in the revocation proceedings: AD Bulgartabac Holding.

Applicant in the revocation proceedings:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Decision declaring the Community trade mark concerned to be revoked.

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the applicant's appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The admissibility requirements concerning the application by AD Bulgartabac Holding which OHIM is obliged to consider of its own motion were not taken into account, contrary to Community law, Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) and other principles of procedure.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

I, Craig H. Barratt, the chief executive officer of Atheros Communications, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,:



|(i) | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2007                 
|                                     
|/s/ Craig H. Barratt                 
|Craig H. Barratt                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of MISONIX, INC. (the "Company") on
Form  10-Q/A  for  the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Zaremba,
Chief  Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

/s/  Richard Zaremba
Chief Financial Officer
September 18, 2003




A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to MISONIX, INC. and will be retained
by  MISONIX, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff  upon  request.


<PAGE>
MEMORANDUM

DATE: October 7, 2011

SUBJECT: Information on Conventional Spray Guns from D. Titus of Kitchen 

Cabinet Manufacturers Association 

FROM: Nicholas Swanson, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/NRG 

TO: Docket No.: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0786

On July 28, 2011, Mr. Dick Titus of the Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers Association 

(KCMA) responded via email (see Attachment) to an inquiry that I made regarding the 

prevalence of conventional spray guns within the industry. According to his survey results, 28 of 

the 200 kitchen cabinets manufacturers that he polled responded to his inquiry. Mr. Titus and I 

both generally presumed that if a facility did not respond then they did not use conventional 

spray guns. I took this to mean that approximately 86% of the facilities, industry wide, do not use 

conventional spray guns. Of the conventional guns that are being used, 73% have systems to 

collect overspray and recycle it. Based on the responses to Mr. Titus’s survey, most facilities 

have moved away from using conventional spray equipment and of the remaining conventional 

spray guns that are used within the industry, most have control devices to reduce or eliminate 

overspray and the associated emissions. 
Attachment
# Mingo - Appalachian Regional Commission

- The Natural Capital Investment Fund: A Path To Success In 2016, the Natural Capital Investment Fund (NCIFund) partnered with the Hatfield McCoy Trail Authority and Southern West Virginia Community and Technical College (Southern) to drive recreational tourism development in the coalfields of southern West Virginia. Through ARC POWER funding, the partners launched a revolving loan fund dedicated to financing and providing business technical assistance [&#8230;]The post The Natural Capital Investment Fund: A Path To Success appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- SWEEP: Training West Virginia’s Entrepreneurs “About 80% of West Virginia businesses have 20 or less employees,” said Alyssa Keedy, the Advanced Career Education Coordinator at the West Virginia Department of Education (WVDE). Why is that the case? One reason is a disconnect between West Virginia workers and the skills needed by local employers. With many young West Virginians either leaving [&#8230;]The post SWEEP: Training West Virginia&#8217;s Entrepreneurs appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Region 2–Planning and Development Council Executive Director Chris Chiles Email &#x63;&#x63;&#x68;&#105;&#108;es&#x40;&#x72;&#x65;&#x67;&#105;&#111;n2&#x70;&#x64;&#x63;&#46;&#111;&#114;gThe post Region 2–Planning and Development Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.