alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                      IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
                   CALCULATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
  (EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF UNITED STATES DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                              -----------------------
                                                                 1997         1996
                                                              ----------   ----------
                                                              (AUDITED)    (AUDITED)
<S>                                                           <C>          <C>
BASIC
Net income..................................................    $100,320      $92,565
Common shares outstanding at January 1, 1997................  25,000,000   25,000,000
Common shares outstanding at December 31, 1997..............  25,017,603   25,000,000
Weighted average common shares outstanding..................  25,010,060   25,000,000
     Net income per common share............................    $   4.01      $  3.70
</TABLE>
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                              -----------------------
                                                                 1997         1996
                                                              ----------   ----------
                                                              (AUDITED)    (AUDITED)
<S>                                                           <C>          <C>
DILUTED
Net income..................................................    $100,320      $92,565
Weighted average common shares outstanding..................  25,010,060   25,000,000
Dilutive effect of share options............................   1,482,341    1,080,744
                                                              ----------   ----------
Total.......................................................  26,492,401   26,080,744
                                                              ----------   ----------
     Net income per common share............................    $   3.79      $  3.55
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

The subsidiaries of Allied Holdings, Inc. and the place of incorporation or
organization are as follows:

Allied Automotive Group, Inc. - Georgia
Allied Southwoods, Inc. - Georgia
Axis Group, Inc. - Georgia
Allied Systems, Ltd., LLP - Georgia
Inter Mobile, Inc. - Georgia
Legion Transportation, Inc. - Georgia
Automotive Transport Services, Inc. - Georgia
Allied Systems (Canada) Company - Nova Scotia
Axis International, Inc. - Georgia
Axis Truck Leasing, Inc. - Georgia
Axis North America, Inc. - Georgia
Kar-Tainer International, Inc. - Florida
Canadian Acquisition Corp. - Georgia
RC Management Corp. - Delaware
GACS Incorporated - Florida
Allied Freight Broker, Inc. - Virginia
QAT, Inc. - Florida
OSCHO, Inc. - Florida
Terminal Service Co. - Washington
F.J. Boutell Driveaway Co., Inc. - Michigan
RMX, Inc. - Delaware
Transport Support, Inc. - Delaware
Commercial Carriers, Inc. - Michigan
B&C Inc. - Michigan
Haul Insurance Limited - Cayman Islands
AH Industries, Inc. - Alberta
Kar-Tainer International Limited - Bermuda
Axis Netherlands, LLC - Georgia
Axis Netherlands C.V. - Netherlands
Axis Holdings Ltda. - Brazil
Axis Areta, LLC - Georgia
Arrendadora de Equipo para el Transporte de Automoviles, s. de R.L. de C.V.-
Mexico
Axis Logistica, S. de R.L. de C.V. - Mexico
Logistic Technology, LLC - Georgia
Kar-Tainer International (Pty) Ltd. - South Africa
Axis Canada Company - Nova Scotia
Allied ASL Holdings, Inc.
CT Services, Inc. - Michigan
CT Group, Inc. - Michigan
Cordin Transport, Inc. - Michigan
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0517

DCN:_____10035

___________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

November 13,
2007

U.
S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N. E.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

The
certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code. This certification is not to be deemed to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q (the "Report") accompanying this letter and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

I,
J. William Holden, III, the Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Mirant Americas Generation, LLC (the "Company"), certify that, subject to the
qualifications noted below, to the best of my knowledge:



|Name: |  | /s/J. WILLIAM HOLDEN, IIIJ. William Holden, III Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |  | 
|----- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mirant Americas Generation, LLC and will be retained by Mirant Americas Generation, LLC
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
**Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2011 – Konsum Nord v Commission**

**(Case T-244/08)**

State aid – Land sale price – Decision declaring aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery – Private investor test – Determination of market price

1.                     *State aid – Concept – Legal nature – Interpretation on the basis of objective factors – Judicial review – Scope (Art. 87(1)
EC) (see paras 37-38)*

2.                     *State aid – Concept – Assessment of all factors relevant to the transaction at issue and its context – Sale of land part of
a series of linked operations designed to allow implementation of a town planning scheme (Art. 87(1) EC) (see paras 56-58)*

3.                     *State aid – Concept – Assessment according to the criterion of the private investor – Assessment of all factors relevant to
the transaction at issue and its context – Sale of land by a public authority to a private person despite the existence of
an offer at a higher price – Comparability between the two offers – Criteria for assessment (Art. 87(1) EC) (see paras 61-63,
65, 72, 76)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision 2008/366/EC of 30 January 2008 on State aid C 35/06 (ex NN 37/06) implemented by Sweden for Konsum Jämtland Ekonomisk Förening (OJ 2008 L 126, p. 3). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Annuls Commission Decision 2008/366/EC of 30 January 2008 on State aid C 35/06 (ex NN 37/06) implemented by Sweden for Konsum Jämtland Ekonomisk Förening; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Konsum Nord ekonomisk förening. |
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 18

- 00150

- CR Victor Javier Cruz TORRES , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CR9470 Honorable K evin M. O’ Connell, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: May 30, 2018
DIS MISSED
On May 2, 2018 , this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record within thirty days of the order. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174, 175

- 76 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order). Appellant’s counsel filed a response in which he states that he has reviewed the clerk’s record and “can find no right of appeal” for appellant; counsel concedes that we may dismiss the appeal for that reason. In light of the record presented, Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss04

- 18

- 00150

- CR

- 2

- this appeal. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). The record does not contain a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal; to the contrary, the trial court certification in the record states “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by t he prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that the defendant has no right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2( d).
PER CURIAM Do not publish
# C_2008116EN.01002101.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 14 March 2008 — Buczek Automotive v Commission

(Case T-1/08 R)

(Interim measures - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Admissibility - No urgency)

(2008/C 116/38)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Buczek Automotive sp. z o.o. (Sosnowiec, Poland) (represented initially by: T. Gackowski and subsequently by D. Szlachetko-Reiter, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Gross, M. Kaduczak and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2007) 5087 final of 23 October 2007 in Case No C 23/2006 (ex NN 35/2006) concerning State aid granted by Poland to the steel producer Grupa Technologie Buczek

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
# C_2010246EN.01000502.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Alexander Hengartner, Rudolf Gasser v Landesregierung Vorarlberg

(Case C-70/09) (1)

1

(Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons - Lease of hunting ground - Regional tax - Concept of economic activity - Principle of equal treatment)

2010/C 246/08

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Alexander Hengartner, Rudolf Gasser

Applicants:

Defendant: Landesregierung Vorarlberg

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) — Interpretation of Article 43 EC — Concept of economic activity — Hunting for sport and without a profit motive — Sale of game to cover part of the hunting costs — No profit

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The provisions of the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, signed in Luxembourg on 21 June 1999, do not preclude a national of one of the contracting parties from being subjected in the territory of the other contracting party, as a recipient of services, to different treatment from that reserved to persons whose principal residence is in that territory, citizens of the Union, and persons who are equated to those citizens under European Union law, with respect to the charging of a tax payable for the provision of services such as the making available of a right to hunt.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 01.05.2009.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1515]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           IN HONOR OF OHIO STATE REPRESENTATIVE KENNETH YUKO

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. DENNIS J. KUCINICH

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 13, 2012

  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor State Representative 
Kenneth ``Kenny'' Yuko of Ohio's 7th House District.
  Representative Yuko started his career as a clothing buyer for 
Polsky's Department Store; however, he soon found he was developing a 
passion for union organizing and advocating for workers' rights. His 
first job in public service, which spanned 30 years, was with the 
Laborers' Local #860 Union. Not only did he act as a union organizer 
for 25 years, but he also earned several awards, including the 2000 
Organizing Award.
  Now as a State Representative, Mr. Yuko advocates for workers' rights 
as well as increased health care access and Multiple Sclerosis 
awareness. In 2004, he worked to pass H.B. 379, designating March as MS 
Awareness Month in Ohio. His efforts with this bill earned him Ohio 
Health Advocacy Network's 2006 award for Legislator of the Year. He 
also serves as a ranking member of the House Commerce, Labor and 
Technology committee and a member of the Health and Aging and Veterans 
Affairs Committees.
  Outside of his duties as State Representative, Mr. Yuko holds a place 
on the Bureau of Workers Compensation Oversight Committee, Unemployment 
Advisory Committee, Ohio Historical Society Board (ex-officio), and is 
an active member of the Cancer, Fire, Housing and Mental Health 
caucuses.
  Mr. Speaker and colleagues, please join me in honoring the 
achievements of State Representative Kenny Yuko.

                          ____________________
```
#### Minnie McDOWALL and James McDowall, Wife and Husband, Appellants (Plaintiffs below), v. Mrs. Ralph WALTERS, Appellee (Defendant below).

No. 2964.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

April 26, 1961.

Henderson & Godfrey, Cheyenne, for appellants.

Edward T. Lazear, of Loomis, Lazear & Wilson, Cheyenne, for appellee.

Before BLUME, C. J., and PARKER, HARNSBERGER and McINTYRE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s petition for rehearing appears to be based upon the assumption that this court has made certain erroneous findings of fact. It was made sufficiently clear in the original opinion that only the trier of the facts, in this case a jury, can say what the true facts were. As stated in that opinion, we do not pretend to say what findings of fact a jury would have made from the evidence adduced, and it would serve no purpose to continue to discuss the matter as to which are the correct and which are the incorrect conclusions to be drawn from said evidence.

Rehearing denied.
0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

Map Created: October 2009.

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census, SF1.

Population Density Rates in Appalachia, 2000

Population density is a measure of the dispersion of people, 

which is calculated by dividing the 2000 census population by 

the 2000 land area in square miles. 500 - 1,755

200 - 499

50 - 199

6 - 49

People Per Square Mile

U.S. average = 79.6

Appalachian average = 115.4
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit (3)-4

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                         GRAND HAVANA ENTERPRISES, INC.

               Grand Havana Enterprises, Inc., a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

FIRST: That by a Unanimous Written Consent of the Board of Directors of the
Corporation, resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of
the Certificate of Incorporation of said Corporation, declaring said amendment
to be advisable and providing that the written consent of the stockholders to
such amendment should be obtained. The resolution setting forth the proposed
amendment is as follows:

               RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of this
        Corporation be amended by changing the first sentence of the Article
        thereof numbered "Fifth" so that, as amended, said sentence of said
        Article shall be and read in full as follows:

               "FIFTH: The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation
               shall have authority to issue is Fifty-Three Million (53,000,000)
               shares, consisting of Fifty Million (50,000,000) shares of Common
               Stock, par value one cent ($.01) per share, and Three Million
               (3,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, par value one cent ($.01)
               per share."

               All other provisions of Article Fifth and all other provisions of
the Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation shall remain unchanged and in
full force and effect.

SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, the
written consent of the stockholders of the corporation was obtained in
accordance with Section 228 of the General Corporation Law, by which consent the
necessary number of shares as required by statute consented to the amendment,
and written notice of action taken by such stockholders' consent has been given
as provided in Section 228 of the General Corporation Law.

THIRD:  That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions 
of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by
Harry Shuster, an authorized officer, this 11th day of November, 1997.

                                            By /s/ Harry Shuster
                                              ---------------------------    
                                              Harry Shuster, 
                                              Chief Executive Officer
# C_2008183EN.01001601.xml

| 19.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/16

---

Action brought on 22 May 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-220/08)

(2008/C 183/31)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Condou-Durande, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2004/83/EC (1) of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, or in any event by not notifying those provisions to the Commission, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 38 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2004/83/EC (1) of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, or in any event by not notifying those provisions to the Commission, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 38 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of Directive 2004/83 into domestic law expired on 10 October 2006.

---

(1)  OJ L 304, 30.9.2004, p. 12.

1

---
# C_2009082EN.01003502.xml

| 4.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/35

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 29 January 2009 — EMSA v Portugal

(Case T-4/08) (1)

1

(2009/C 82/61)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 183, 19.7.2008.

1

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-60527 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus WILLIE LEE JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:00-CR-105-1-LN

-------------------- Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender, counsel for Willie Lee Johnson, has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Johnson has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN IA

In the Matter of

JOHN SHASANMI :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2611 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

Board File No. C2

- 19

- 218

(Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, No. M

4090)

Attorney Registration No. 311041

(Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18 th day of July, 2019, having failed to respond to a Notice and

Order directing him to provide reasons against the imposition of reciprocal discipline, John

Shasanmi is disbarred from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

He shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.