alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 29, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 19, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 150 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-128, CP2024-134.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-28735 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          44,989
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,514
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,740
<INVENTORY>                                    148,845
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               311,413
<PP&E>                                         527,999
<DEPRECIATION>                                 145,508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 719,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          144,645
<BONDS>                                        430,499
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       101,100
<OTHER-SE>                                    (26,489)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   719,530
<SALES>                                        886,017
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               886,017
<CGS>                                          722,539
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  722,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               199,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (76,218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (30,487)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (45,731)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (940)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (46,671)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of
Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Form 10-K), of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                        |  |     |  |                                                                
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 27, 2013 |  | By: |  | /s/    WILLIAM J. DOYLE                                        
|                        |  |     |  | William J. Doyle                                               
|                        |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                          
|Date: February 27, 2013 |  | By: |  | /s/    WAYNE R. BROWNLEE                                       
|                        |  |     |  | Wayne R. Brownlee                                              
|                        |  |     |  | Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K,
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K.
# C_2008092EN.01002902.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/29

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 13 February 2008 — Buczek Automotive v Commission

(Case T-1/08 R)

(Interim measures - Application for suspension of operation - Article 105(2) of the Rules of Procedure)

(2008/C 92/60)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Buczek Automotive sp, z o.o. (Sosnowiec, Poland) (represented by: T. Gackowski, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of Commission Decision C(2007) 5087 final of 23 October 2007 concerning State aid No C 23/2006 (ex NN 35/2006) granted by Poland to the steel producer Grupa Technologie Buczek

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Suspends, until the adoption of the order concluding the present application for interim measures, the operation of Commission Decision C(2007) 5087 final of 23 October 2007 concerning State aid No C 23/2006 (ex NN 35/2006) granted by Poland to the steel producer Grupa Technologie Buczek, insofar as that decision concerns Buczek Automotive sp, z o.o. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Suspends, until the adoption of the order concluding the present application for interim measures, the operation of Commission Decision C(2007) 5087 final of 23 October 2007 concerning State aid No C 23/2006 (ex NN 35/2006) granted by Poland to the steel producer Grupa Technologie Buczek, insofar as that decision concerns Buczek Automotive sp, z o.o.

| 2. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Reserves the costs.

---
# C_2009113EN.01001201.xml

| 16.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-245/08) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Free movement of persons - Freedom to provide services - Right of establishment - Adjustments consequent on the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania)

2009/C 113/22

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Andrade and H. Støvlbæk, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes and F. Fraústo de Azevedo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to have adopted, within the time-limit prescribed, the measures necessary to comply with Council Directive 2006/100/EC of 20 November 2006 adapting certain Directives in the field of freedom of movement of persons, by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania (OJ 2006 L 363, p. 141)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the time-limit prescribed, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2006/100/EC of 20 November 2006 adapting certain Directives in the field of freedom of movement of persons, by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the time-limit prescribed, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2006/100/EC of 20 November 2006 adapting certain Directives in the field of freedom of movement of persons, by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1) of that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 183, 19.7.2008.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1365-E1366]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           HONORING THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA MEN'S GOLF TEAM

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. JO BONNER

                               of alabama

                    in the house of representatives

                         Tuesday, July 31, 2012

  Mr. BONNER. Mr. Speaker, I rise to honor the University of Alabama's 
men's golf team which placed runner up to the National Champion Team 
from the University of Texas, on June 3, 2011. The Crimson Tide's 
record of accomplishment this season is the best in the history of the 
University's golf program.
   Although the Tide was behind all day, they fought hard to come back. 
Senior Hunter Hamrick, from Montgomery, was able to put points on the 
board for the Crimson Tide with a 6 and 5 win. Sophomore Bobby Wyatt, 
from Mobile, played a dramatic hole with a birdie chip on 18 winning 
his match 1 up. Sophomore Cory Whitsett tied the final match with a 
birdie on 17. And, on 18, Texas player Dylan Frittelli needed to sink a 
20-foot-putt to beat the Crimson Tide in the final match.
   With such an outstanding performance, the Alabama golf team 
completed their most successful season in the school's history by 
placing runner-up at the NCAA Championship. The team also won its third 
SEC Championship, the school's second regional title, as well as 
finished first in the stroke-play portion of the NCAA Championship over 
Texas by 10 shots.
   The 2012 men's golf team members are Hunter Hamrick, Lee Knox, Tom 
Lovelady, Trey Mullinax III, Scott Strohmeyer, Justin Thomas, Cory 
Whitsett, and Bobby Wyatt.
   The coaching staff consists of Head Coach Jay Seawell, Assistant 
Coach Scott Limbaugh, and Team Chaplain Stephan Bunn.
   On behalf of the people of Alabama and my colleagues in the Alabama 
Delegation, I wish to extend personal congratulations to Coach Jay 
Seawell, the coaching staff, and the men of the University of Alabama 
Men's Golf Team for their tremendous accomplishment.

[[Page E1366]]

                          ____________________
```
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 13, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1215

Lower Tribunal No. 16-28388

________________

Ramon Fernandez,

Appellant,

vs.

Mayra B. Fernandez,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Judith K. 

Rubenstein, Senior Judge.

Law Office of Laurence A. Wanshel, P.A., and Laurence A. Wanshel, 

for appellant.

 O’Connor Law Firm, PLLC, and Sean P. O’Connor, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4406 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4406

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 99 Macombs Place in New York, New York, as the ``Tuskegee Airmen 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TUSKEGEE AIRMEN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 99 Macombs Place in New York, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Tuskegee Airmen Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Tuskegee 
Airmen Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4406

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 99 Macombs Place in New York, New York, as the ``Tuskegee Airmen 
                        Post Office Building''.
```
# C_2009282EN.01006403.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/64

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 7 October 2009 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-3/08) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Refusal of an institution to translate a decision - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law - Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure)

2009/C 282/122

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decision not to translate a note into the language chosen by the applicant — Application for damages.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Tribunal:

| 1. | dismisses Mr Marcuccio’s action as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses Mr Marcuccio’s action as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | orders Mr Marcuccio to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Mr Marcuccio to pay the costs.

| 3. | orders Mr Marcuccio to pay to the Tribunal the sum of EUR 1 000 |
| --- | --- |

3.

orders Mr Marcuccio to pay to the Tribunal the sum of EUR 1 000

---

(1)  OJ C 64 of 08.03.2008, p. 68

1

---
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS






To GEMSA Loan Services, L.P.:

We have examined management's accompanying assertion about GEMSA Loan Services, L.P.'s (GEMSA) compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association ofAmerica's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) for the period from August 1, 2001 (date of formation of the Partnership), to December 31, 2001, in relation to its servicing of multifamily and commercial mortgage loans. Management is responsible for GEMSA's compliance with the aforementioned servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about GEMSA's compliance with the aforementioned standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on GEMSA's compliance with the aforementioned standards.

In our opinion, management's accompanying assertion that GEMSA's servicing of multifamily and commercial mortgage loans complied in all material respects with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards for the period from August 1, 2001 (date of formation of the Partnership), to December 31, 2001, is fairly stated, in all material respects.
Houston, Texas
March 5, 2002
# C_2009205EN.01003402.xml

| 29.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/34

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 July 2009 — Promat v OHIM — Prosima Comercial (PROSIMA PROSIMA COMERCIAL S.A.)

(Case T-71/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark PROSIMA PROSIMA COMERCIAL S.A. - Earlier national word mark PROMINA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Absence of similarity between the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))

2009/C 205/62

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Promat GmbH (Ratingen, Germany) (represented initially by S. Beckmann, and subsequently by H. Alt, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by A. Poch, and subsequently by G. Schneider, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Prosima Comercial, SA (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 November 2007 (Case R 574/2007-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Promat GmbH and Prosima Comercial, SA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Promat GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Promat GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

1

---
APPENDIX C- EPA’s Clarification on Superseded RACT Documents from the 2015 SIP Revision

On April 26, 2016, PADEP submitted to EPA, on behalf of AMS, a SIP revision (the 

2016 SIP revision) superseding RACT determinations for 13 major sources in Philadelphia 

previously addressed in the SIP revision dated February 18, 2015 (2015 SIP revision). The table 

below indicates the type of documentation supporting the RACT determinations for each source 

that was superseded. 

Table 1. Superseded Documentation within 2015 SIP Revision by Source

Major Source Plant ID 

Number

Major 

Source 

Pollutant

Superseded Documentation

RACT 

Technical 

Memo

RACT 

Permit

Other (If 

so, specify)

Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. 03363 VOC x - -

Cardone Industries Inc.-

Rising Sun Avenue and 

Whitaker Avenue a

03887/ 

02287 VOC x - -

Exelon Generating 

Company- Richmond Station 04903 NOx x x -

Honeywell- Frankford Plant 

[formerly, Sunoco ChemicalFrankford Plant]

01551 NOx and 

VOC x x

Bart 

Analysis

Kinder Morgan Liquids 

Terminals, LLC [formerly, 

GATX Terminals Corp.]

05003 VOC x x

Vendor’s 

Quote 

MIPC, LLC 05004 VOC x - -

Naval Surface Warfare 

Center, Carderock Division 

(NSWCCD) 

09724 NOx x x -

Philadelphia Energy 

Solutions- Refining and 

Marketing, LLC [formerly, 

Sunoco Inc. (R&M)-

Philadelphia]

01501 / 

01517

NOx and 

VOC x x

Facility 

submission
Major Source Plant ID 

Number

Major 

Source 

Pollutant

Superseded Documentation

RACT 

Technical 

Memo

RACT 

Permit

Other (If 

so, specify)

Philadelphia Gas WorksRichmond Plant 04922 NOx x x -

Philadelphia Prison System 09519 NOx x x -

Plain Products Terminals, 

LLC [formerly, Maritank 

Philadelphia, Inc. and Exxon 

Company, USA]

05013 VOC x x -

University of Pennsylvania 08912 NOx x - -

Veolia Energy- Schuylkill 

Station [TRIGEN- Schuylkill 

Station] b 04942 NOx x x -

Veolia- Energy Efficiency, 

LLC b

10459 NOx c

x

NOTES:

a

 Formerly, Cardone owned various adjacent facilities, from which two facilities were subject 

to source-specific RACT under the 1-hour ozone standard. The facilities have two separate 

source-specific RACT determinations approved in the Pennsylvania SIP under the 1-hour 

ozone standard, corresponding to PLIDs 03887 and 02237. After 1-hour RACT, various 

adjacent facilities owned by Cardone were aggregated and evaluated for RACT as one major 

source. 

b

 Gray Ferry Cogeneration Plant, Veolia Schuylkill and Veolia Energy Efficiency have been 

aggregated as a single major source after the 1-hour RACT determination. AMS submitted 

RACT documentation for each facility separately, although considering RACT applicability as 

a single major source of NOx. 

c The RACT technical memorandum for Veolia Energy Efficiency that was submitted as part 

of the 2015 SIP revision was supplemented in 2016, but not superseded Additionally the 

RACT permit that was submitted for Veolia Energy Efficiency in 2015 was not superseded.