alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4609 

To provide for the conveyance of a Forest Service site in Dolores County, 

Colorado, to be used for a fire station. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2017 

Mr. TIPTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the conveyance of a Forest Service site in 

Dolores County, Colorado, to be used for a fire station. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘West Fork Fire Sta5 tion Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) COUNTY.—The term ‘‘County’’ means Dolo9 res County, Colorado. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4609 IH

1 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of Agriculture. 

3 (3) WEST FORK FIRE STATION CONVEYANCE

4 PARCEL.—The term ‘‘West Fork Fire Station Con5 veyance Parcel’’ means the parcel of approximately 

6 3.61 acres of National Forest System land in the 

7 County, as depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Map for 

8 West Fork Fire Station Conveyance Parcel’’ and 

9 dated November 21, 2017. 

10 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF WEST FORK FIRE STATION CON11 VEYANCE PARCEL, DOLORES COUNTY, COLO12 RADO. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—On receipt of a request from the 

14 County and subject to such terms and conditions as are 

15 mutually satisfactory to the Secretary and the County, in16 cluding such additional terms as the Secretary determines 

17 to be necessary, the Secretary shall convey to the County 

18 without consideration all right, title, and interest of the 

19 United States in and to the West Fork Fire Station Con20 veyance Parcel. 

21 (b) COSTS.—Any costs relating to the conveyance 

22 under subsection (a), including processing and transaction 

23 costs, shall be paid by the County. 

24 (c) USE OF LAND.—The land conveyed to the County 

25 under subsection (a) shall be used by the County only for 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4609 IH

1 a fire station, related infrastructure, and roads to facili2 tate access to and through the West Fork Fire Station 

3 Conveyance Parcel. 

4 (d) REVERSION.—If any portion of the land conveyed 

5 under subsection (a) is used in a manner that is incon6 sistent with the use described in subsection (c), the land 

7 shall, at the discretion of the Secretary, revert to the 

8 United States. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Order filed August 7, 2018. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00246-CV

____________

LINDA ALAN, Appellant

V.

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 125th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-09047

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due July 26, 2018. No brief or motion for extension of 

time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before August 22, 2018, 

the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Tax Credit Properties III L.P.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Housing Credits Inc., general
partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties III L.P., General Partner of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



/s/  Neal Ludeke
------------------------------
by: Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Richman
Housing Credits Inc., general partner
of Richman Tax Credit Properties III
L.P., General Partner of the Company
June 30, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Seamless Wi-Fi, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Albert
Reda, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.


/s/ Albert Reda
---------------
Albert Reda,
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2008
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Years ended December 31,
                                                 -----------------------------------------------------
                                                   2000       1999        1998       1997       1996
                                                   -----      -----       -----      -----      -----

<S>                                           <C>            <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>
    Earnings (loss) from                      $   12,556     12,619      12,390      6,802      3,208
    operations
    Less: sales of residential
    property, net
    of cost of residential property
    sold                                               -          -           -          -          -
    Add:
      Interest expense                            16,355     14,062      12,081     12,555     12,354
      Interest portion of                            224        234         260        225        227
    rentals (2)
                                                 --------  ---------   ---------  ---------  ---------
    Earnings available for fixed              $   29,135     26,915      24,731     19,582     15,789
    charges                                      ========  =========   =========  =========  =========

    Fixed Charges:
      Interest expense (3)                        16,355     14,062      12,081     12,555     12,354
      Interest capitalized                         1,142        242         873        445        104
      Interest portion of                            224        234         260        225        227
      rentals (2)                                --------  ---------   ---------  ---------  ---------
    Fixed Charges                             $   17,721     14,538      13,214     13,225     12,685
                                                 ========  =========   =========  =========  =========

    Ratio of earnings to fixed                $     1.65       1.85        1.87       1.48       1.24
    charges

    Excess of Fixed Charges over Earnings     $     -          -           -          -          -

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
CSB BANCORP, INC.EXHIBIT 31.2Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CertificationSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerI, Paula J. Meiler, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CSB Bancorp, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 

 
CSB BANCORP, INC. a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: August 11, 2006       /s/ Paula J. Meiler Paula J. Meiler    Senior Vice President and    Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7469

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MERLIN WAYNE TURNER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CR-97-166-MU, CA-00-497-MU) Submitted: January 28, 2002 Decided: February 28, 2002 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Merlin Wayne Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Turner claims that counsel was ineffective for failing to inform him that he would be exposed to a mandatory ten-year term of supervised release. Because he failed to present this claim to the district court, we decline to address it. See Muth v. United States , 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993) (holding that claims raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered absent exceptional circumstances). 2 PER CURIAM: Merlin Wayne Turner seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion for summary judgment and denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Turner , Nos. CR-97-166- MU; CA-00-497-MU (W.D.N.C. filed June 26, 2001 & entered June 29, 2001). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 89001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28418]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration # 20139; NEW YORK Disaster Number NY-20005 
Declaration of Economic Injury]


Administrative Declaration of an Economic Injury Disaster for the 
State of New York

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) 
declaration for the State of NEW YORK dated 12/19/2023.
    Incident: Five-Alarm Fire.
    Incident Period: 08/20/2023.

DATES: Issued on 12/19/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/19/2024.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for disaster loans 
may be submitted online using the MySBA Loan Portal https://lending.sba.gov or other locally announced locations. Please contact 
the SBA disaster assistance customer service center by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9df9f4eefceee9f8effee8eee9f2f0f8efeef8efebf4fef8ddeefffcb3faf2eb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="27434e54465453425544525453484a4255544255514e44426754454609404851">[email protected]</span></a> or by phone at 1-800-659-2955 for 
further assistance.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:
    Primary Counties: Kings.
    Contiguous Counties:
New York: New York, Queens, Richmond

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Business and Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere..      2.375
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 201390.
    The State which received an EIDL Declaration is New York.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023-28418 Filed 12-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5709]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. BENISHEK:
       H.R. 6297.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8, clause 14
       ``To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the 
     land and naval Forces''
       And;
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 18
       ``To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for 
     carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other 
     Powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the 
     United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.''
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 244 (Thursday, December 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 88426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28050]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 21, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 12, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 35 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-113, CP2024-118.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-28050 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
September 10, 2012 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H5767 

H. Con. Res. 122: Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. 

H. Con. Res. 129: Mr. RANGEL and Mr. BACA. 

H. Res. 134: Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. 

DENHAM, Mr. LANKFORD, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE

JOHNSON of Texas, and Mr. CLAY. 

H. Res. 238: Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas. 

H. Res. 289: Ms. JACKSON LEE of Texas. 

H. Res. 298: Mr. LEWIS of Georgia. 

H. Res. 374: Mr. SCHOCK. 

H. Res. 609: Mr. MORAN and Mr. WELCH. 

H. Res. 630: Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mrs. ADAMS, 

Mr. RIBBLE, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. GRIFFITH of 

Virginia, and Mr. GRAVES of Georgia. 

H. Res. 671: Mr. COOPER. 

H. Res. 687: Mr. OLVER. 

H. Res. 745: Mr. COSTA and Mr. DANIEL E. 

LUNGREN of California. 

H. Res. 756: Mr. VAN HOLLEN. 

H. Res. 757: Mr. MICHAUD. 

H. Res. 763: Ms. R

f 

ICHARDSON. 

CONGRESSIONAL EARMARKS, LIMITED TAX BENEFITS, OR LIMITED TARIFF BENEFITS 

Under clause 9 of rule XXI, lists or 

statements on congressional earmarks, 

limited tax benefits, or limited tariff 

benefits were submitted as follows: 

OFFERED BY MR. ROGERS OF KENTUCKY

H.J. Res. 117, the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2013, does not contain any 

congressional earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits as defined in 

clause 9 of rule XXI. 

f 

PETITIONS, ETC. 

Under clause 3 of rule XII, 

58. The SPEAKER presented a petition of 

Alger County Board of Commissioners, 

Munising, MI, relative to Resolution No. 

2012-11 asking the Michigan Delegation to 

show their support for past and present 

Michigan service members and their families; to the Committee on Armed Services. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with HOUSE
Countries Infested with Khapra Beetle 

Countries designated by the USDA as having endemic khapra beetle and 

considered as high risk for introduction include the following: 

 Afghanistan  Niger 

 Algeria  Nigeria 

 Bangladesh  Oman 

 Burkina Faso (Upper Volta)  Pakistan 

 Cyprus  Palestinian Authority, West Bank 

 Egypt  Qatar 

 India  Republic of Sudan 

 Iran  Saudi Arabia 

 Iraq  Senegal 

 Israel  South Sudan 

 Kuwait  Sri Lanka 

 Libya  Syria 

 Mali  Tunisia 

 Mauritania  Turkey 

 Morocco  United Arab Emirates 

 Myanmar (Burma) 

06/2022 1 
Countries Infested with Khapra Beetle 

2 Manual Title Here 06/2022
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1444]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 RECOGNIZING THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF MACEDONIA BAPTIST CHURCH, HURON, 
                                  OHIO

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. MARCY KAPTUR

                                of ohio

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Ms. KAPTUR. Mr. Speaker, I rise to recognize the centennial 
anniversary of Macedonia Baptist Church, located in Toledo, Ohio. The 
congregation will celebrate this milestone event on August 25, 2012.
  Since its founding in 1912, Macedonia Baptist Church has served its 
congregation and its community inspired by Christ's teachings as 
recorded in Matthew 25:40 that, ``Whatsoever you do to the least among 
you, that you do unto me.'' Its ``rich history of service began on 
Yondota Street on the East side of Toledo'' where the church originally 
stood and continues to the present day from its location in West 
Toledo.
  Through a century of service the church has been a neighborhood 
mainstay. In addition to worship services, Macedonia Baptist Church 
members teach fellowship and provide services to families in need. 
Motivated by their servants' hearts and strong pastoral leadership, the 
church carries forth a tradition of reaching out. All are welcome into 
the faith-filled, inspired congregation. We proudly commemorate this 
100th anniversary while looking forward to Macedonia Baptist Church's 
future.

                          ____________________
```
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Clarence E. Sanford, Deceased. Margaret E. Sanford, Appellant, v Patricia A. S. Dekdebrun, Respondent.

— Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and petition granted, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Surrogate’s Court erred in determining that petitioner Margaret Sanford had waived her claim to alimony arrears. The parties’ April 26, 1977 judgment of divorce provided that "clarence e. sanford [decedent] shall pay to Margaret sanford as and for her alimony and support the sum of One Thousand Twenty Five ($1,025.00) Dollars monthly”. In 1985 decedent reduced his alimony payments by the amount of Social Security benefits received by petitioner. After decedent’s death in February 1987, petitioner submitted a claim against the estate for the $9,023.35 alimony arrearage from 1985 to 1987. The executrix of the estate rejected the claim on the ground that petitioner had waived the payments. A waiver is a "voluntary and intentional relinquishment of a known and otherwise enforceable right” *(Messina v Messina,*143 AD2d 735, 737). Here, the record establishes that petitioner, through counsel, repeatedly made demands for the alimony payments as provided in the judgment of divorce, and threatened legal action. Given those circumstances, petitioner did not waive her right to receive such payments *(see, Lannon v Lannon,*124 AD2d 1051, 1052; *Katzenstein v Katzenstein,*90 AD2d 533). The order is reversed and petitioner’s claim against the estate in the amount of $9,023.35 for unpaid alimony is granted. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Surrogate’s Court, Mattina, S. — Estate Accounting.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Lawton, Lowery and Davis, JJ.