alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010234EN.01001701.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/17

---

Order of the Court of 15 April 2010 — Makhteshim-Agan Holding BV, Alfa Agricultural Supplies SA, Aragonesas Agro, SA v European Commission, Bayer CropScience AG, European Crop Protection Association (ECPA), Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-517/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Directive 91/414/EEC - Non-inclusion of endosulfan in Annex I to that directive - Withdrawal of marketing authorisations - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

2010/C 234/24

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Makhteshim-Agan Holding BV, Alfa Agricultural Supplies SA, Aragonesas Agro, SA (represented by: C. Mereu and K. Van Maldegem, avocats)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Bayer CropScience AG, European Crop Protection Association (ECPA) (represented by: L. Parpala and N.B. Rasmussen, acting as Agents, C. Mereu, avocat, K. Van Maldegem, avocat, D. Waelbroeck, avocat and N. Rampal, avocate), Kingdom of Spain

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 9 September 2008 in Case T-75/06 Bayer CropScience AG and Others v Commission by which the Court of First Instance dismissed an action for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2005) 864 of 2 December 2005 concerning the non-inclusion of endosulfan in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that active substance [notified under No C(2005) 4611] (OJ 2005 L 317, p. 25)

Bayer CropScience AG and Others

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Makhteshim-Agan Holding BV, Alfa Agricultural Supplies SA and Aragonesas Agro SA are ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Makhteshim-Agan Holding BV, Alfa Agricultural Supplies SA and Aragonesas Agro SA are ordered to pay the costs.

| 3. | European Crop Protection Association (ECPA) shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

European Crop Protection Association (ECPA) shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 24.1.2009.

1

---
#### In the Matter of 319 West 108th Street Realty Corp., Petitioner, against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as State Rent Administrator, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

May 26, 1954.

*William G. Raines*for petitioner.

*Robert H. Schaffer*and *Harold Drachman*for respondent.

Aroh Steuer, J.

The question on this application is whether respondent, Rent Commissioner, has been arbitrary in his determination that the apartment in question is not subject to decontrol. The premises were originally a private house and at the time petitioner took title were unoccupied. The portion involved had, however, been registered with the Federal Rent Control Authorities as one room and a bathroom. Petitioner made certain alterations the material part of which was the conversion of a closet in the room into a kitchénette.

The first question is whether such an alteration entitles petitioner to decontrol under section 11 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations. This section requires respondent to decontrol housing accommodations where there has been “ a structural change in a residential unit or units involving substantial altera*679tions or remodeling; and snch change has resulted in additional housing accommodations consisting of self-contained family units The section defines a self-contained family unit as “ a housing accommodation with private access, containing one or more rooms in addition to a kitchen (including kitchenette or pullman kitchen) and a private bathroom.”

The alteration in question qualifies as creating additional housing accommodations. There was no self-contained family unit as defined by the regulation before the alteration and there is one now. It is immaterial that the space accommodated one family before and one now. The test is whether it provided a family unit as defined by the section.

But that is not the sole test. In addition, the family unit must have been created through the medium of a substantial alteration or remodeling. Definitions of structural change gathered from interpretations of leases and the like are not significant in this connection because the statute says what it means by a structural change, namely, one that involves creation of one or more new family units by means of substantial alterations or remodeling. What is a substantial alteration is in the first instance a matter for the respondent to decide and by familiar rules his determination becomes final if it is not arbitrary.

Here respondent’s conclusion is somewhat obscured by the fact that it is placed partly on the ground that no new family unit was brought into existence. Despite the error in that respect the fact remains that it was also placed on the absence of a substantial alteration. As to that the question is not so free from doubt as to warrant interference.

Petitioner presents other questions, but its failure to prevail on this one makes decision unnecessary.

Motion denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1395]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              HONORING SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN WEST TENNESSEE

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. STEPHEN LEE FINCHER

                              of tennessee

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Mr. FINCHER. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize schools in the 
Fayette County, Henry County, Hollow Rock-Bruceton, McKenzie Special, 
Milan Special, South Carroll County Special, and Union City districts. 
Each of these districts in West Tennessee earned the state's highest 
status of ``exemplary'' for their efforts to raise student growth and 
close achievements gaps during the 2011-2012 school year.
   The Tennessee Department of Education recently received a federal 
waiver to replace the No Child Left Behind accountability system with 
its own. Tennessee's new accountability system recognizes students 
across the state have different needs and a one-size-fits-all approach 
doesn't always work. It measures growth and improvement based on a 
school's starting point of proficiency, rather than expecting all 
schools to meet specific proficiency targets each year.
   To reach exemplary status under Tennessee's new accountability 
system, schools in the Fayette County, Henry County, Hollow Rock-
Bruceton, McKenzie Special, Milan Special, South Carroll County 
Special, and Union City districts met the majority of their achievement 
and gap closure targets and ensured students moved forward or held 
steady in target areas. Attaining exemplary status shows these schools 
are truly making improvements and helping students learn.
   On behalf of the United States House of Representatives, I commend 
the teachers and staff of these school districts for their hard work 
and commitment to improving public education for all students in 
Tennessee. Please join me in congratulating them on their success and 
achievements.

                          ____________________
```
EX-10.7




 Exhibit 10.7 

AppDynamics, Inc. 
 March 28, 2014

 Chuck Robel 
 Via Electronic Mail 

Dear Chuck: 
 On behalf of AppDynamics, Inc. (the
“Company”), I am pleased to inform you that the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) is interested in having you serve on the Board and likely as the Chair of the Company’s Audit Committee when
formed. If all necessary Board action is taken, the Company is prepared to offer you the compensation described below in exchange for your performance of duties as a director. 

If elected as a member of the Board, you will be granted an option to purchase 211,847 shares (the “Option”) under the Company’s
2008 Stock Plan (the “Plan”). The Option shall vest in 48 equal monthly installments as you continue service on the Board. Such vesting shall commence as of your election to the Board. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event
that the company consummates a Change in Control (as defined in the Plan) at any time while you remain a member of the Board, then subject to your execution and non-revocation of a standard release of claims in favor of the Company (or its
successor), 100% of the unvested shares subject to the Option shall vest and become exercisable immediately prior to such Change in Control. The exercise price per share of the Option shall be equal to the fair market value per share of the
Company’s common stock on the date it is granted, as determined by the Board. 
 For so long as you are a member of the Board, the Company will
reimburse you for your reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, including reasonable travel expenses, incurred in attending Board meetings and committee meetings and in carrying out your duties as a director or committee member. 

You understand that, if elected, you will serve on the Board at the pleasure of the stockholders of the Company and that your duties are subject to change at
any time without notice. You know of no reason why you would be precluded from serving as a member of the Board or any of its committees, either because of existing competition restrictions or fiduciary duty obligations or otherwise. 

On behalf of the Company, we are excited about the possibility of having you join us at this critical juncture in our growth and development. 

 

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Jyoti Bansal
	 Jyoti Bansal
 Chief Executive
Officer



  

	
	 Acknowledged and agreed to on
 this 28th day of March, 2014

	
	/s/ Charles Robel
	Charles Robel
# C_2008171EN.01003803.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/38

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 11 April 2008 — Cyprus v Commission

(Case T-122/08 R)

(Application for interim relief - Procurement notice for a contract to encourage economic development in the northern part of Cyprus - Application for suspension of operation of the notice - No urgency)

(2008/C 171/73)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: P. Kliridis, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. van Nuffel and I. Zervas, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of a procurement notice issued by the Commission for the encouragement of economic development in the northern part of Cyprus, concerning the establishment of a programme management unit to support the implementation of investment projects in the field of water, waste water and solid waste.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim relief is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim relief is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Connections
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

         3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date:  August 11,  2006

                                         By: /s/ DANIEL L. CAMMARANO, III
                                             ----------------------------
                                             Daniel L. Cammarano, III
                                             Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Connections
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

         3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date:  May  15, 2006

                                             By: /s/ DANIEL L. CAMMARANO, III
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Daniel L. Cammarano, III
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Voyager Petroleum, Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sebastien C. Dufort, CEO and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



Date: May 20, 2008                         By: /s/ Sebastien C. Dufort
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Sebastien C. Dufort
                                               Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unify Corporation (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended July 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Todd E. Wille, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|Dated: December 14, 2007 | /s/ TODD E. WILLE       | 
|------------------------ | ----------------------- | 
|                         | Todd E. Wille           | 
|                         | Chief Executive Officer | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

32

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 249 (Friday, December 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 90201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28727]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Discount Rates for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Federal 
Programs

AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget.

ACTION: Revisions to Appendix C of OMB Circular No. A-94.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-94 
specifies certain discount rates to be updated annually when the 
interest rate and inflation assumptions used to prepare the Budget of 
the United States Government are changed. These updated discount rates 
are found in Appendix C of the Circular and are to be used for cost-
effectiveness analysis, including lease-purchase analysis, as specified 
in the revised Circular. These rates do not apply to regulatory 
analysis. The revised Appendix C of Circular No. A-94 can be accessed 
at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/CircularA-94AppendixC.pdf.

DATES: The revised discount rates will be in effect through December 
2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jamie Taber, Office of Economic 
Policy, Office of Management and Budget, 202-395-2515, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eb8ad2dfab848689c58e849bc58c849d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6809515c2807050a460d0718460f071e">[email protected]</span></a>.

Wesley Yin,
Associate Director for Economic Policy, Office of Management and 
Budget.
[FR Doc. 2023-28727 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Advisory Agreements for PB Intl Fund F, WMT-Series A


 Exhibit 10.8 
  

					
	 	  	Two American Lane	  	Tel 203.861.1031
	 	  	P.O. Box 5150	  	Fax 203.552.1501
	 


	  	Greenwich, Connecticut	  	 
	  	06831-8150	  	 
	  	 	  	 
	  	Joseph J. Allessie	  	 
	 	  	Senior Vice President	  	 
	 	  	General Counsel	  	 

  
 September 14, 2004 
  
 Eagle Trading Systems 
 Attn: General Counsel/Secretary 
 47 Hulfish Street, Suite 410 
 Princeton, NJ 08542 
  
 Re: Advisory Agreements
for PB International Fund F, World Monitor Trust – Series A 
  
 Please
be advised that it is anticipated that as of October 1, 2004, all the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the “Prudential Managing Owners”) of the above stated Trusts/Fund are
owned by Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. f/k/a Kenmar Advisory Corp. (the “Kenmar Managing Owner”). Therefore, with respect to the various advisory agreements currently in effect by and between the Trusts/Fund, the Prudential Managing
Owner and you, please be notified that the Kenmar Managing Owner has assumed the liabilities and obligations of the Prudential Managing Owner thereunder and will continue to satisfy and perform all liabilities and obligations thereunder. 

 
 The Kenmar Managing Owner will continue to operate per the existing advisory agreements.
If this is acceptable, please sign both copies of this Letter Agreement and return one copy. 
  

			
	 PREFERRED INVESTMENT SOLUTIONS CORP.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Joseph J. Allessie


	 Name:
	 	 Joseph J. Allessie

	 Title:
	 	 Senior Vice President, General Counsel

	
	 ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

	
	 EAGLE TRADING SYSTEMS

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Menachem Sternberg


	 Name:
	 	 Menachem Sternberg

	 Title:
	 	 Chairman
# Highland - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission Executive Director Bonnie Riedesel Email cspd&#99;&#64;&#99;&#115;&#112;&#100;&#99;&#x2e;&#x6f;&#x72;&#x67;The post Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2013156EN.01002901.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — SOZA v Commission

(Case T-413/08) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Sharing of the geographic market - Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies - Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences - Proof - Presumption of innocence)

2013/C 156/49

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Slovenský ochranný Zväz Autorský pre práva k hudobným dielam (SOZA) (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented by: M. Favart, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and A. Biolan, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) (Neuilly-sur-Seine, France) (represented by: J.-F. Bellis and K. Van Hove, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 3 of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC), in so far as it concerns Slovenský ochranný Zväz Autorský pre práva k hudobným dielam (SOZA); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 3 of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC), in so far as it concerns Slovenský ochranný Zväz Autorský pre práva k hudobným dielam (SOZA);

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 22.11.2008.

1

---