alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Allegany - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Western Maryland: Elevating the Outdoors Two Appalachian Maryland counties used BIL funds to expand outdoor recreation by attracting new businesses and more visitors.  The post Western Maryland: Elevating the Outdoors appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Frostburg State University: Advancing Technology in Western Maryland  In September 2021, Frostburg State University received the state of Maryland’s first-ever ARC POWER implementation grant. The $1,480,979 award helped continue the development of the Advanced Technology Center at Frostburg’s Innovation Park, which works to strengthen Western Maryland’s economy by creating new job opportunities and supporting local industry growth.&#160; &#160;Students at the center explore fields [&#8230;]The post Frostburg State University: Advancing Technology in Western Maryland  appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Allegany College of Maryland Manufacturing Training Program: Western Maryland Works Western Maryland Works is a full-service makerspace, small-business incubator project that provides access to technology and equipment, and training facility focusing on machining, welding, and industrial maintenance. With ARC support, Western Maryland Works purchased state-of-the-art advanced manufacturing equipment such as computers, electronic classroom systems, general furnishings, equipment for wood working, 3-D printers, and other makerspace [&#8230;]The post Allegany College of Maryland Manufacturing Training Program: Western Maryland Works appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Tri-County Council for Western Maryland, Inc. Executive Director Leanne Mazer Email &#108;&#x65;&#x61;&#110;&#x6e;&#x65;&#64;&#x74;&#x63;&#99;&#x77;&#x6d;&#100;&#x2e;&#x6f;&#114;&#x67;The post Tri-County Council for Western Maryland, Inc. appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2009032EN.01002303.xml

| 7.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/23

---

Action brought on 16 December 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-555/08)

(2009/C 32/42)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Dejmek and K. Nyberg, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 (1) on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies with regard to financial companies needing support from a public source, in particular banks and insurance companies, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 (1) on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies with regard to financial companies needing support from a public source, in particular banks and insurance companies, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for implementation of the Directive expired on 15 December 2007.

---

(1)  OJ L 310, p. 1.

1

---
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) AmendmentNo. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, James G. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. and will be retained by AdvancedCell Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 
| Date: September 7, 2005 |
|------------------------------|
|                         |
| /s/ James G. Stewart         |   |
| James G. Stewart             |   |
| Chief Financial Officer      |

 

----
#### Higa v. Tanaka

16633

11/29/94

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 10.6c



November 7, 2003


Samuel K. Freshman
Standard Management Company
6151 West Century Boulevard, Suite 300
Los Angeles, California  90045

Dear Sam:

         This letter agreement is regarding the sublease, by and between Quik
Communications Hosting, Inc., a subsidiary of IVI Communications, Inc. ("IVIC")
at the time of the sublease, and Standard Management Company ("Standard"). The
sublease concerns property located at 6171 W. Century Blvd, Suite 140 (the
"Premises"). IVIC, as tenant, and Standard, as subtenant, entered into the
sublease of the Premises on April 7, 2003 wherein Standard was to sublease the
Premises for the remainder of the initial term of the primary lease, and for a
rent calculated as base rent payable under the primary lease less one thousand
dollars ($1,000.00) per month. IVIC, occupying a small portion of the Premises,
was obligated under the terms of the lease to pay one thousand dollars
($1,000.00) per month, the discounted portion of the lease. The initial term of
the primary lease was for five years and three and one-half months dating back
to June 21, 2002.

         In conjunction with the settlement of various other matters between
Standard and IVIC which are the subject of separate settlement documents, the
parties wish to terminate and rescind the sublease of the Premises. The parties
also hereby agree that IVIC may continue to occupy the portion of the Premises
that it presently occupies at the rate of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per
month, on a month-to-month basis with 30-day termination notice required by
either party, for the balance of the lease term between Standard and the owner
of the building. IVIC will no longer be obligated on the lease or sublease,
notwithstanding the month-to-month lease arrangement described above.

DATED:  November 7, 2003               STANDARD MANAGEMENT COMPANY

                                       By:  /s/ Samuel K. Freshman
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Samuel K. Freshman

DATED:  November 7, 2003               QUIK COMMUNICATIONS HOSTING, INC.

                                       By:  /s/ John C. Snyder
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       John C. Snyder

DATED:  November 7, 2003               IVI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

                                       By:  /s/ Nyhl Henson
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Nyhl Henson

DATED:  November 7, 2003               IVI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

                                       By:  /s/ Charles J. Roodenburg
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Charles J. Roodenburg
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1104 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric 

project involving the Gibson Dam. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2015 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. TESTER, and Mr. RISCH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction 

of a hydroelectric project involving the Gibson Dam. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY 

4 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT IN5 VOLVING GIBSON DAM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the require7 ments of section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

8 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal Energy 

9 Regulatory Commission project numbered 12478–003, the 

10 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (referred to in 


Emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1104 IS

1 this section as the ‘‘Commission’’) may, at the request of 

2 the licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice 

3 and in accordance with the procedures of the Commission 

4 under that section, extend the time period during which 

5 the licensee is required to commence construction of the 

6 project for a 6-year period that begins on the date de7 scribed in subsection (b). 

8 (b) DATE DESCRIBED.—The date described in this 

9 subsection is the date of the expiration of the extension 

10 of the period required for commencement of construction 

11 for the project described in subsection (a) that was issued 

12 by the Commission prior to the date of enactment of this 

13 Act under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

14 806). 

Æ 


Emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
FIRST AMENDMENT SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT-SEXTON



 Exhibit 10.7 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 NEW PEOPLES BANK, INC. 
 SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT 
 DATED DECEMBER 18, 2002 
 FOR

 FRANK SEXTON, JR. 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT executed on this 30th day of June, 2003, by and between the NEW PEOPLES BANK, INC., a state chartered commercial bank located in Honaker,
Virginia (the “Company”), and FRANK SEXTON, JR. (the “Executive”) 
  
 On December 18, 2002, the Company and the Executive executed the SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”). 
  
 Pursuant to the power of amendment reserved by Article 7 of the Agreement, the undersigned hereby amends, in part, said Agreement for the purposes of: (i)
removing definitions, (ii) changing the Effective Date, and (iii) changing the Plan Year. Therefore, 
  
 Section 1.2 shall be deleted from the Agreement. 
  
 Section 1.3 shall be deleted from the Agreement. 
  
 Section 8.2 shall be deleted from the Agreement. 
  
 Section 2.2.4 shall be added to the Agreement as follows: 
  
 The benefit amount is subject to a vesting schedule of zero percent (0.0%) in the first Plan Year, and one hundred percent (100%)
thereafter. 
  
 IN WITNESS OF THE ABOVE, the Executive and
the Company have agreed to this First Amendment. 
  

									
	Executive:	 	 	 	 Company:

			
	 	 	 	 	NEW PEOPLES BANK, INC.
				
	 /s/ Frank Sexton, Jr.
	 	 	 	By	 	 /s/ Lynn Keene

	 Frank Sexton, Jr.
	 	 	 	Title	 	 Chairman of the Board
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 05/05-0351]

Notice is hereby given that Stonehenge Opportunity Fund V, L.P., 191 W Nationwide Boulevard, Suite 600, Columbus, OH 43215, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small business concern, has sought an exemption under section 312 of the Act and 13 CFR 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations. Stonehenge Opportunity Fund V, L.P. is seeking a written exemption from SBA for a proposed financing to True North Asphalt Holdings, LLC, 1241 E 11 Mile Road, Madison Heights, MI 48071.

The financing is brought within the purview of 13 CFR 107.730(a) of the Regulations because True North Asphalt Holdings, LLC is an Associate of Stonehenge Opportunity Fund V, L.P. because Associate Stonehenge Opportunity Fund IV, L.P. owns a greater than ten percent interest in True North Asphalt Holdings, LLC, therefore this transaction is considered Financing which constitute conflicts of interest requiring SBA's prior written exemption.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on this transaction within fifteen days of the date of this publication to the Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416.

Bailey DeVries,

Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, United States Small Business Administration.

[FR Doc. 2024-00009 Filed 1-4-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### Matter of the Application of Cecil MACKEY and Winona Mackey for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Bail.

No. A-12838.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Dec. 16, 1959.

*1047Kenneth B. Kienzle, Shawnee, for petitioners.

Harvey H. Cody, Jr., County Attorney, Pottawatomie County, Shawnee, for respondents.

BRETT, Judge.

This is an original petition in habeas corpus brought by Cecil Mackey and Wi-nona Mackey for the purpose of being ad-t mitted to bail pending trial upon a charge of the murder of one Marvin Yoder, which charge is now pending against them in Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma.

The verified petition alleges that they are being unlawfully restrained of their liberty in the County Jail of Pottawatomie County by the Sheriff thereof where they are awaiting trial on the aforesaid charge pending in the District Court of said county. They allege that proof of guilt of the alleged crime is not evident nor the presumption thereof great. It appears they were denied bail by the committing magistrate and the District Judge of said county in habeas corpus proceedings.

On hearing herein, the matter was submitted to this Court on the transcripts of the proceeding before the committing magistrate, the District Court, and testimony taken herein, the petitioners testifying in their own behalf herein. It is not ncessary to set out the evidence in detail. It is sufficient to say that the evidence offered in their own behalf and by the officers who testified for the state,- as the same. appears from this record, does not entitle: the petitioners to bail, since the proof of guilt is evident and the presumption thereof great.

It is therefore that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied.

POWELL, P. J., and NIX, J., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                   |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: February 22, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN
WEALE
|                         |  |  |  | Name:             |  | John R. Weale          
|                         |  |  |  | Title:            |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE01754

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

July 26, 2005

U. S. Securities andExchange Commission450 Fifth Street, N. W.Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The certification set forth below is being submitted tothe Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying withSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Thiscertification is not to be deemed to be filed pursuant to the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q(the “Report”) accompanying this letter and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

I, Curtis A.Morgan, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Mirant AmericasGeneration, LLC (the “Company”), certify that, subject to the qualificationsnoted below, to the best of my knowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mirant AmericasGeneration, LLC.
| Name:  |     | /s/ CURTIS A.  MORGAN                    |   |
|--------|----------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | * * | *President and Chief Executive  Officer* |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Mirant Americas Generation, LLC andwill be retained by Mirant Americas Generation, LLC and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
# C_2008313EN.01004102.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/41

---

Action brought on 29 September 2008 — OSA v Commission

(Case T-418/08)

(2008/C 313/75)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním (OSA) (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Favart, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Article 3 of the Commission decision of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC); and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Article 3 of the Commission decision of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC); and

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By means of this application the applicant seeks partial annulment pursuant to Article 230 EC of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC) relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA. Precisely, the applicant contests the Commission findings in Article 3 of the contested decision stating that territorial delineations of the reciprocal representation mandates granted by one authors' society to another constitute a concerted practice in violation of Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA.

The pleas in law and main arguments raised by the applicant are identical to those raised by the applicant in Case T-415/08 IMRO v Commission.

---
# C_2008064EN.01005402.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/54

---

Action brought on 2 January 2008 — Coedo Suárez v Council

(Case T-3/08)

(2008/C 64/87)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Angel Coedo Suárez (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare this application admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare this application admissible;

| — | annul the Council's decision of 30 October 2007 in so far it refuses to grant the applicant the access sought to several Council documents relating to, and arising from, an incident between the applicant and one of his colleagues on 19 February 2004 (minutes of internal meetings, investigation findings and a report of the security service); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Council's decision of 30 October 2007 in so far it refuses to grant the applicant the access sought to several Council documents relating to, and arising from, an incident between the applicant and one of his colleagues on 19 February 2004 (minutes of internal meetings, investigation findings and a report of the security service);

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By this action, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of 30 October 2007, adopted by DG F of the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union, rejecting his formal request for access to documents relating to an incident between the applicant and one of his colleagues.

In support of his action, the applicant relies on two pleas.

The first plea alleges infringement of Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation No 1049/2001 (1) and infringement of the obligation to state reasons for applying that provision.

1

The second plea alleges infringement of Article 5 of Regulation No 45/2001 (2) and a manifest error in the application of that regulation.

2

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

1

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ 2001 L 8, p. 1)

2

---
#### Ex parte BILLY et al.

No. A-12018.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Jan. 20, 1954.

Emerson-Billy, Sprouse Billy, per se. ■

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Owen J. Watts, Asst.-Atty. Gen.,-for defendant in error.

JONES, Judge.

It appears from the response filed in the above entitled and numbered cause.that an appeal was taken from the judgment of conviction sustained by the petitioners, which appeal was filed in this court on October 21, 1953, as Case No. A-12,004.

This habeas corpus action seeks modification of a sentence which can only be done by an appeal. The writ of habeas corpus may not be sustituted for an appeal, and since an appeal is pending, presenting the identical issues sought to be presented in this habeas corpus action, it is evident that this petition must be dismissed.

It is so ordered.

POWELL, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.