alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 29, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 20, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage*                    ®                     *Contract 151 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-129, CP2024-135.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-28736 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6241]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The majority leader is recognized.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1


Hanover Compressor Company ("HCC"), list of subsidiaries

1.    Hanover Acquisition Corporation, a Texas corporation and a wholly owned
      subsidiary of HCC.

2.    Hanover Compressor Colombia, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly
      owned subsidiary of HCC.

3.    Hanover Land Company, a Texas corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary
      of HCC.

4.    Hanover Maintech, Inc. (f/k/a Maintech Enterprises, Inc.), a Texas
      corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of HCC.

5.    Hanover/Smith, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary
      of HCC.

6.    HCC owns 33% of the issued and outstanding stock or Wartsila Compressions
      Systems GmbH, a German company.

7.    H.C.C Compressor de Venezuela, C.A., a Venezuelan corporation and a
      wholly owned subsidiary of HCC.

8.    Hanover-PGN Compressor, C.A., a Venezuelan corporation and a wholly owned
      subsidiary of H.C.C. Venezuela.

9.    HCC owns 99.992% of the issued and outstanding stock of Contract
      Compression International Argentina, S.A., an Argentinean corporation
      ("CCIA"). HMI owns the remaining 0.008% of CCIA stock.

10.   Hanover Compressor Holding Company NL B.V., a Dutch company ("Hanover
      Holding") and a wholly-owned subsidiary of HCC

11.   Hanover Cayman Limited, a Cayman Islands company ("Hanover Cayman") and a
      wholly-owned subsidiary of HCC

12.   Hanover Holding owns 99.99%$ of the issued and outstanding of Hanover
      Compressor Company Bolivia, Ltd., a Bolivian company ("HCC Bolivia").
      Hanover Cayman owns the remaining 0.01% of HCC Bolivia stock

13.   Hanover Cayman owns 60% of the issued and outstanding stock of
      Hanover/Enron Venezuela, Ltd., and a Cayman Islands company.

14.   HCC owns 99.99% of the membership interests of Hanover Compressor Mexico
      SRL, a Mexican limited liability company ("Hanover Mexico"). Hanover
      Cayman owns the remaining 0.01% of said membership interests.

15.   Hanover Compressor Sucursal Mexico, a Mexican branch and a wholly owned
      subsidiary of HCC.

16.   HCC owns 35% of Hanover/Cosacol Consortium, a Colombian consortium.

17.   HCC owns 51% of Hanover Compressor Colombia Ltd., a Colombian limitada.

18.   HCC owns 99% of the membership interest of 3113442 Nova Scotia Co., a
      Nova Scotia unlimited liability company. HMI owns the remaining 1% of
      said membership interests.

19.   HCC owns 35% of Collicutt's Mechanical Services, Ltd., a Canadian
      corporation.

20.   Astra Resources International, Inc., a Texas corporation and wholly owned
      subsidiary of Hanover Acquisition Corporation.

21.   HCC Acquisition, Inc., a Texas corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary
      of HCC.

22.   Eureka Energy Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned
      subsidiary of HCC.
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCUIT

No. 12-60166 Summary Calendar

PEARL L. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DOCTOR LONNIE EDWARDS, In his official capacity as superintendent of Jackson Public Schools District; JASON SARGENT, In his official capacity and individually capacity, Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:10-CV-73

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Pea rl L

. J ohnson appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in her suit alleging claims for employment discrimination and hostile work environment. Having reviewed the briefs, the record, and the applicable law, we conclude that Johns o n h a s failed to show

error. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment for the reasons given in U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Janu ary29 , 20 13 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion s houldnot * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 12-60166 Document: 00512128352 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/29/2013No. 12-60166

the district court’s careful opinion, but we briefly address a few points raised on appeal. To the extent that John s o n a r gues she was not required to exhaust administrative remedies for her discrimination claims, she is incorrect. See , e.g. , Taylor v. Books A Million, Inc. , 296 F.3d 376, 378–79 (5th Cir. 2002). Johnson also challenges the district court’s alleged failure to recuse. We note that although Johnson filed a motion to recuse the magistrate judge, she did not seek recusal of the district judge, and we see no basis in the record to question either judge’s impartiality. See 28 U.S. C

. § 4 5 5

. W e also find no merit in Johnson’s argument that the district court violated her Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendment rights by deciding her case on summa ry j u dgment. See , e.g. , Oglesby v. Terminal Transp. Co. , 543 F.2d 1111, 1112–1 3 ( 5 th Cir. 1976) (holding that the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial is not violated when

a party fails to show a genuine issue of material fact as required by F E D
. R. C IV
. P. 56). Finally, given the district court’s broad discretion in enforcin g f i l i n g deadlines, see Hetzel v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. , 50 F.3d 360, 367 (5th Cir. 1995), the court did not err by striking some of Johnson’s pleadings as untimely or by declining to address issues raised in untimely pleadings. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-60166 Document: 00512128352 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/29/2013
# 2014 - Appalachian Regional Commission

- High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties.The post High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties. The post College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties.The post Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average.The post Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2013–2017 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The post Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 This map shows the high school completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties. The post High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties.The post College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 This map shows the college completion rate of persons ages 25 and over in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average.The post Relative College Completion Rates in Appalachia, 2012–2016 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 96-4052

_____________ Raphael Williams, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern Delta Dental Plan of Missouri; Beck, * District of Missouri. Grieshaber, Haffmer, Hotz, Maguire, * Oleskevich, Tonsi, DDS, PC, doing * [UNPUBLISHED] business as Sunset Hill Dental Group, * * Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: September 12, 1997 Filed: September 23, 1997

_____________ Before BOWMAN, Circuit Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and MORRI S SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

_____________ PER CURIAM. The com plaint filed by the plaintiff, Raphael Williams, who is black, asserte d claims of race discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, antitrust violations unde r Section 1 of the Sherman Act, and a state-law claim of tortious interference with a business rela

tionship. The lawsuit is founded primarily on the denial by Delta Dental Plan of Missouri of certain claims submitted by Williams, a periodontist, for treatmentThe Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1 District of Missouri. Willi ams's counsel in this appeal was not his attorney in the District Court 2 proceedings. -2- of patients insured by Delta Dental. The District Court determined that Williams' s 1 evidence w as insufficient to support a prima facie case of race discrimination fo r purpo ses of § 1981. As to the Sherman Act claims, the court noted Williams' s concession that he lacked evidence to support them. Accordingly, the District Court granted summary judgment to the defendants with respect to the § 1981 and Sherman Act cla ims. Having thus eliminated the federal-law claims from the case, the District Cou rt declined to exercise pendent jurisdiction (or, to use the current terminology , supplemental jurisdiction) over the state-lawtortious interference claim, and dismissed that claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The court also granted, in part, the defendants' motions for sanctions against Williams for his repeated failures to comply with discovery orders.
Williams appeals the Distict Court's dispositions of his § 1981 and tortiou s interference cla

ims, as well as the court's imposition of sanctions. Having considered all of Williams's arguments, we conclude that the District Court (1) was correct i n determining th at Williams's evidence was insufficient to support a prima facie case of race discrimination under § 1981, (2) did not abuse its discretion in declining t o exercise jurisdiction over the tortious interference claim, and (3) did not abuse it s discretion in imposi ng sanctions upon Williams. Our review of the record satisfies us that the sa nctions imposed were appropriate in amount, and we cannot say that th e co urt abused its discretion by imposing them upon Williams rather than upon hi s attorney. Because no error of law or abuse of discretion appears and an opinion would 2 add nothing new to the corpus juris , we forego extended discussion. The challenged orders of the District Court are AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-3-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF ASYST TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 NAME
    
    STATE/COUNTRY OFINCORPORATIONAsyst Technologies Europe Ltd.
    
    U.K.Asyst Technologies GmbH
    
    GermanyAsyst Technologies Far East Pte. Ltd.
    
    SingaporeAsyst Technologies Taiwan Ltd.
    
    R.O.C.Asyst Technologies Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
    
    MalaysiaSMIF Equipment Tianjin Co. Ltd.
    
    P.R.C.Asyst Korea, Ltd.
    
    KoreaAsyst Japan, Inc.
    
    JapanAsyst Shinko, Inc.
    
    Japan
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 461 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 461

                   For the relief of Ibrahim Parlak.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2017

  Mr. Upton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Ibrahim Parlak.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR IBRAHIM PARLAK.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Ibrahim 
Parlak shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for 
adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Ibrahim Parlak enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), Ibrahim 
Parlak shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Ibrahim Parlak, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Ibrahim Parlak under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Ibrahim Parlak under section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)).
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Ibrahim 
Parlak shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**
**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas P. Reed, Vice President of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                        /s/ Thomas P. Reed        Thomas P. Reed        (chief financial officer)        May 13, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 455 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  House Calendar No. 36
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 455

                          [Report No. 115-84]

  To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 East Court 
 Street in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ``R. Jess Brown United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2017

 Mr. Thompson of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                             April 6, 2017

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 East Court 
 Street in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ``R. Jess Brown United States 
                             Courthouse''.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 501 East Court Street in 
Jackson, Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the ``R. Jess 
Brown United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``R. Jess Brown 
United States Courthouse''.
                                                  House Calendar No. 36

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 455

                          [Report No. 115-84]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 East Court 
 Street in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ``R. Jess Brown United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 6, 2017

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Amendment to the Business Lease



 Exhibit 10.49(a) 
  
 Shell/Elenac 
 Amendment Lease Agreement 
 Lease Agreement - Kraton 
  
 AMENDMENT 
  
 to the 
  
 BUSINESS LEASE 
  
 of March 31, 2000 
  
 between 
  
 Basell Polyolefine GmbH (previously
Elenac GmbH), Am Yachthafen 2, 77694 Kehl 
 (hereinafter “LANDLORD”) 
  
 and 
  
 Kraton Polymers GmbH, Kölner Str. 6, 65760 Eschborn (hereinafter “TENANT”). 
  
 § 4.5 of the Business Lease shall be amended and shall now have the following wording:

  
 Notwithstanding § 4.1 or § 4.2 above, this lease shall be terminable
at the option of the LANDLORD, which option will not be used unreasonably by the LANDLORD, on giving three months’ notice of termination, if there is any change in the ownership or control of TENANT or any entity which, whether directly or
indirectly, holds 50% or more of the issued share capital of TENANT provided, however, that the foregoing shall not apply with respect to any transaction immediately prior to which the TENANT is a member of the Shell Group (as defined in § 4.6
below). 
  

					
			
	/s/    [ILLEGIBLE]        	 	 	 	/s/    [ILLEGIBLE]        
	 Place, Date
	 	 	 	 Place, Date

			
	/s/    [ILLEGIBLE]        	 	 	 	/s/    [ILLEGIBLE]        
	LANDLORD	 	 	 	TENANT

  

 - 1 -
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 249 (Friday, December 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 90200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28825]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-23-059]


Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: January 10, 2024 at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Agendas for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Commission vote on Inv. No. 701-TA-686 (Final) (Brass Rod from 
India). The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and file its 
determinations and views of the Commission on February 1, 2024.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory 
Hearings and Information Officer, 202-205-2000.
    The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the 
Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, 
subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 
may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: December 27, 2023.
Sharon Bellamy,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-28825 Filed 12-27-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P