alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Omer Regev, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NetManage, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Periodic Report), that, to my knowledge, the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    OMER
REGEVName:

Omer RegevTitle:

Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of FinanceDated:

March 31, 2008




The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Application of Jack C. RUSSELL, for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

No. A-13042.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

June 28, 1961.

An application for writ of habeas corpus by Jack C. Russell an inmate in the State Penitentiary at McAlester, to secure his release. Writ denied.

Jack C. Russell, pro se.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Lewis A. Wallace, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

BUSSEY, Judge.

The petitioner, Jack C. Russell, an inmate in the state penitentiary at McAlester seeks his release in this cause and asserts as grounds that he is being restrained and imprisoned unlawfully. He was received at the State Penitentiary on the 3rd day of September, 1958, after being sentenced upon a plea of guilty to the charge of murder. A life sentence was imposed by the District Court of Okmulgee County, Oklahoma and the petitioner asserts in this cause that: (1) The evidence was insufficient to support the charge of murder as set out in the information; (2) That petitioner was not furnished with a copy of the information and a list of the State’s witnesses to appear against him prior to the trial; (3) That he was arrested September 1, 1958 and was forced to trial September 2, 1958 and (4) That a plea of guilty was obtained by reason of threats and promises and undue pressure having been exerted upon him.

The State contends that as a matter of law the petitioner is not entitled to the relief sought herein because this Court passed upon the validity of the judgment and sentence now in question and held adversely to the contention of petitioner, in Application of Russell for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Okl.Cr., 354 P.2d 485. A review of that case discloses that this contention is correct. In that case all matters raised in the present application were fully and completely dealt with. This Court has repeatedly held that where an application such as the. one before us now has been denied in a prior application by the same applicant, we will not ordinarily entertain subsequent applications for such writ on the same grounds and facts, or any other grounds or facts existing when the first application was made, whether presented then or not, *300Hibbs v. Raines, Okl.Cr., 344 P.2d 672 and Morgan v. Raines, Okl.Cr., 363 P.2d 300. Therefore, the writ is denied.

NIX, P. J., concurs.

BRETT, J., not participating.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, R.H.  Dillon,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to Title 18, United States Code,  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                        /S/ R.H. Dillon
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Print Name: R.H. Dillon
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                        Date: March 21, 2003
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4641 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 21, 2017 

Received 

AN ACT 

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor 

to John L. Canley for acts of valor during the Vietnam 

War while a member of the Marine Corps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4641 RDS

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF MEDAL OF 

2 HONOR TO JOHN L. CANLEY FOR ACTS OF 

3 VALOR DURING THE VIETNAM WAR. 

4 (a) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwith5 standing the time limitations specified in section 6248 of 

6 title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation 

7 with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons 

8 who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award 

9 the Medal of Honor under section 6241 of such title to 

10 John L. Canley for the acts of valor during the Vietnam 

11 War described in subsection (b). 

12 (b) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor 

13 referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of then Gun14 nery Sergeant John L. Canley during combat operations 

15 from January 31, 1968, to February 6, 1968, during the 

16 Vietnam War as a member of the Marine Corps, for which 

17 he was previously awarded the Navy Cross. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 21, 

2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2013225EN.01006002.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/60

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 June 2013 — Fluorsid and Minmet v Commission

(Case T-404/08) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - World market in aluminium fluoride - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Action for annulment - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Out of time - Inadmissibility - Price-fixing and market-sharing - Evidence of the infringement - Rights of defence - Definition of the relevant market - Fines - Gravity of the infringement - 2006 Guidelines on fines)

2013/C 225/134

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Fluorsid SpA (Assemini, Italy); and Minmet financing Co. (Lausanne, Switzerland) (represented by: L. Vasques and F. Perego, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, C. Cattabriga and K. Mojzesowicz, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 3043 of 25 June 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81[EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (COMP/39.180 — Aluminium fluoride), concerning a worldwide price-fixing and market-sharing cartel on the world aluminium fluoride market and, in the alternative, reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Fluorsid SpA and Minmet financing Co. to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Fluorsid SpA and Minmet financing Co. to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 22.11.2008.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6241]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              APPOINTMENT OF ACTING PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will please read a communication to 
the Senate from the President pro tempore (Mr. Inouye).
  The assistant legislative clerk read the following letter:

                                                      U.S. Senate,

                                        President pro tempore,

                               Washington, DC, September 12, 2012.
     To the Senate:
       Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, of the 
     Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby appoint the Honorable 
     Kirsten E. Gillibrand, a Senator from the State of New York, 
     to perform the duties of the Chair.
                                                 Daniel K. Inouye,
                                            President pro tempore.

  Mrs. GILLIBRAND thereupon assumed the chair as Acting President pro 
tempore.

                          ____________________
```
## United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________
No. 18

- 1027

___________________________ Radomysl Twardowski

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
Bismarck Police Department; Lt. Glen Ternes; Sgt. Lyle Sinclair; Det. Brandon Rask

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants

- Appellees

____________ Appeal from United States District Court

for the District of North Dakota

- Fargo

____________
Submitted: February 19, 2019 Filed: February 27, 2019 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

In May 2017, Radomysl Twardowski filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking damages for injuries he allegedly suffered in January 2007 . T he district- 2

- court 1 granted summary judgment to the Bismarck Police Department and several of its officers because Twardowski filed his lawsuit after the statute of limitations had expired

.

We agree with the district court that Twardowski filed his lawsuit too late

. See Spradling v. Hastings , 912 F.3d 1114, 1119 (8th Cir. 2019) (reviewing a grant of summary judgment on a section 1983 claim “based upon the statute of limitations de novo” (citation omitted)). There is no dispute that he filed it more than te n years after the allegedly wrongful act occurred

— long after the six

- year statute of limitations for his excessive

- force claim had expired. See Owens v. Okure , 488 U.S. 235, 2 4 9

– 50 (1989) (explaining that section 1983 actions “borrow” the “general or residual” statute of limitations “for personal injury actions” ); N.D. Cent. Code § 28

- 01

- 16(5) (providing a six

- year statute of limitations for personal

- injury actions )

.

The claim accrued when the wrongful act allegedly occurred in January 200 7
, not sometime later

. See Johnson v. Precythe , 901 F.3d 973, 980 (8th Cir. 2018) (stating that, as a matter of federal law, a section 1983 action accrues “when [the plaintiff] discovers, or with due diligence should have discovered, the injury that is the basis of litigation” (citation omitted)). An d e quitable tolling does not apply because North Dakota law does not recognize it

. See Oakland v. Bowman , 840 N.W.2d 88, 91

– 92 (N.D. 2013 ) ; see also Montin v. Estate of Johnson , 636 F.3d 409, 413 (8th Cir. 2011) (“For a § 1983 action, . . . the issue of equitable tolling, like the underlying statute of limitations, is determined by reference to state law.”)

. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________

1 The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES—OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Bancshares California (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period endingSeptember 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curtis S. Reis, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof and for the periods covered in the Report. 

 

 

Date: November 14, 2005
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5860]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. WALBERG:
        H.R. 6371.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, section 8 of the Constitution of the United 
     States
```
# C_2012165EN.01001602.xml

| 9.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 April 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

(Case T-554/08) (1)

1

(Public service contracts - Call for tenders - Provision of business, technical and project consultancy services for European Union computer applications in the customs, excise and taxation areas - Rejection of a tender - Decision to award the contract to another tenderer - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility - Claim in damages - Selection and award criteria - Duty to state the reasons on which a decision is based - Manifest error of assessment)

2012/C 165/26

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, P. Katsimani and M. Dermitzakis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by N. Bambara and E. Manhaeve, and then by E. Manhaeve, acting as Agents, and C. Erkelens, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

ACTION for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 26 September 2008 rejecting the tender submitted by the consortium formed by the applicant and other companies in response to call for tenders ‘TAXUD/2007/AO-005’ relating to the provision of business, technical and project consultancy services for Community computer applications in the customs, excise and taxation areas (‘TIMEA’), and all consequential decisions, including the decision to award the contract to the successful tenderer, brought pursuant to Articles 225 EC and 230 EC, and a claim in damages brought pursuant to Articles 225 EC, 235 EC and 288 EC.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Frost W. Cochran, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2004 of Belden & Blake Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant
and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 12, 2004
    
    /s/ Frost W. CochranFrost W. Cochran, Director, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer
 26
# Gilmer - Appalachian Regional Commission

- SWEEP: Training West Virginia’s Entrepreneurs “About 80% of West Virginia businesses have 20 or less employees,” said Alyssa Keedy, the Advanced Career Education Coordinator at the West Virginia Department of Education (WVDE). Why is that the case? One reason is a disconnect between West Virginia workers and the skills needed by local employers. With many young West Virginians either leaving [&#8230;]The post SWEEP: Training West Virginia&#8217;s Entrepreneurs appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Region 7–Planning and Development Council Executive Director Shane Whitehair Email &#115;&#x77;&#104;&#x69;&#116;&#x65;&#104;&#x61;i&#x72;&#64;&#x72;e&#x67;i&#111;&#x6e;&#118;&#x69;&#105;&#x2e;&#99;&#x6f;&#109;The post Region 7–Planning and Development Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
WWW.EXFILE.COM - 13400 - MEDIS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. - EXHIBIT 10.1 TO FORM 8-K


EXHIBIT
10.1




PERSONAL
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT MR. Z. REHAVI

IN
MEDIS EL




 

1.   
Salary

The
agreement includes the salary, conditions and fringe benefits to the manager of
the Company for the period April 1, 2005- March 31, 2006


		*	Monthly
      salary U.S. $ 20,000 (in N.I.S. when paid).




		*	U.S.
      $ 1,250 educational fund




		*	U.S.
      $ 1,250 gross-up for educational fund.




		*	U.S.
      $ 3,000 - rent participation




		*	U.S.
      $ 3,000 - gross-up for rent participation.




		*	Bonus
      of three months’ salaries



 

2.   
Fringe
benefits


		*	managers
      insurance based on U.S. $ 20,000 monthly salary.




		*	Life
      insurance for the benefit of the Company and severance insurance to
      employee. 




		*	Annual
      vacation 22 working days.




		*	Right
      for sick leave 30 days a year and right to accumulate up to 3
      months.




		*	Professional
      training fund “Yahav”.




		*	Use
      of the company’s car and all expensed related.




		*	Payment
      for telephone by the company. 




		*	Payment
      of 15 recreation days per year at the rate per Law (to date N.I.S 500 per
      day).



Automatic
transfer of the rights under the managers insurance from employer to employee on
sole demand by the employee on retirement or resignation.

 

3.   
Extra
rights for managers

6 months
salary notification of resignation or dismissal. Payment of 6 months salary
(period of adjustment) (in the period full salary and fringe benefits) inclusive
in case of change of ownership of the Company and dismissal by new
owners.

 

The
manager will be insured by personal insurance against all claims as for
directors.

 

The
manager will be entitled to stock options under the Medis Technologies Ltd.
stock options plan. Quantity, price and other terms consistent with other
members of management and to be approved by the Board of Directors of the
Company. In further consideration for this Agreement, both Parties agree that
neither party shall have any claims, and they hereby waive and release any such
claims, against the other for any compensation or benefits, or for the refund of
same, with relation to any period of employment of the Employee with the Company
prior to this Agreement regardless of the terms of any previous agreement
between the Parties. 

 

 

 

Date:
March 29, 2005

Signed :





 


	 Employee: /s/ Zvi Rehavi
      	 Chairman of the Board: /s/ Robert
      K. Lifton
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 113 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5419]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              APPOINTMENT OF ACTING PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will please read a communication to 
the Senate from the President pro tempore (Mr. Inouye).
  The assistant legislative clerk read the following letter:

                                                      U.S. Senate,

                                        President pro tempore,

                                    Washington, DC, July 26, 2012.
     To the Senate:
       Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, of the 
     Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby appoint the Honorable 
     Michael F. Bennet, a Senator from the State of Colorado, to 
     perform the duties of the Chair.
                                                 Daniel K. Inouye,
                                            President pro tempore.

  Mr. BENNET thereupon assumed the chair as Acting President pro 
tempore.

                          ____________________
```