alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

May 11, 2006 

U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission450 Fifth Street, N. W.Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

The certification set forth below is being submitted tothe Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying withSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Thiscertification is not to be deemed to be filed pursuant to the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q(the “Report”) accompanying this letter and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 

I, Robert E.Driscoll, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Mirant AmericasGeneration, LLC (the “Company”), certify that, to the best of my knowledge: 

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of Mirant Americas Generation,LLC. 
| Name:  |   /s/ ROBERT  E. DRISCOLL                                               |   |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   Robert E. Driscoll*  President and Chief Executive Officer* |   |   |
|        |                                                                                   |        |        |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Mirant Americas Generation, LLC andwill be retained by Mirant Americas Generation, LLC and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40186 c/w No. 06-40196 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CELSO CHAVEZ-BALTAZAR, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CR-149

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *The Federal Public Defender appointed for Celso ChavezBaltazar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). ChavezBaltazar has not filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from furtherNo. 06-40186 c/w No. 06-40196 -2- responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
#### In the Matter of Emilio Morales, Petitioner, against Bernard J. O’Connell, as Commissioner of Licenses of the City of New York, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County,

November 2, 1959.

*Newman & GorfinJcel (Louis Newman*of counsel), for petitioner.

*Charles E. Tenney, Corporation Counsel,*for respondent.

Edgae J. Nathan, Je., J.

This is a petition to annul a revocation of petitioner’s license as a second-hand dealer and to reinstate the license. The principal ground relied upon by the *950Commissioner of the Department of Licenses for revoking the license is based upon his determination of petitioner’s unfitness of character to hold a license. His unfitness is claimed by reason of his having made false statements in his application for motor vehicle license resulting in the revocation of such license and registration. Further, petitioner admitted to four or five arrests and has been convicted as a “ scofflaw”. The Commissioner of Licenses has no power specifically delegated to him by statute to consider the character of the licensee in granting or revoking a license *(Matter of Barton Trucking Corp.*v. *O’Connell,*7 A D 2d 36). Petitioner is not charged with any fraud in his application for this license or with using his license for any illegal purpose. To deprive petitioner, the father of 12 children, of the business in which he has been engaged for 26 years upon the grounds stated was unreasonable, and the Commissioner exceeded his authority (cf. *Matter of Carro*v. *Moss,*184 Misc. 1050).

Accordingly, the motion is granted and respondent is directed to reinstate the license.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of MASTER  DISTRIBUTION  SYSTEMS,  INC.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Harry  P.Beugelink,  Principal  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                               /s/ Harry P. Beugelink
                                              --------------------------
Date: November 8, 2004                              Harry P. Beugelink
                                                    Principal Financial Officer
# C_2008142EN.01001201.xml

| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Pest Megyei Bíróság (Magyar Köztársaság) lodged on 3 March 2008 — CIBA Speciality Chemicals Central and Eastern Europe Szolgáltátó, Tanácsadó és Keresdedelmi Kft. v Adó- és Pénzügyi Ellenőrzési Hivatal Hatósági Főosztály

(Case C-96/08)

(2008/C 142/18)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Pest Megyei Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: CIBA Speciality Chemicals Central and Eastern Europe Szolgáltátó, Tanácsadó és Keresdedelmi Kft.

Applicants:

Defendant: Adó- és Pénzügyi Ellenőrzési Hivatal Hatósági Főosztály

Defendant:

Question referred

Can the principle of freedom of establishment under Articles 43 and 48 EC be interpreted as precluding a legal rule under which a trading company established in Hungary must pay a vocational training levy if it employs workers in a branch abroad and meets its tax and social security obligations with regard to such workers in the State where the branch is situated?

---
# Morgan - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Gateway Area Development District Executive Director Joshua Farrow Email &#x6a;&#111;&#115;h&#x75;&#x61;&#46;f&#x61;&#x72;&#114;ow&#x40;&#107;&#121;&#46;&#x67;&#x6f;&#118;The post Gateway Area Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# FY 2024 - Appalachian Regional Commission

- County Economic Status in Appalachia, FY 2024 This map shows ARC's economic classification of the 423 counties in the Appalachian Region for FY 2024 (October 1, 2023 through September 30, 2024).The post County Economic Status in Appalachia, FY 2024 appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Combined Financial Statements at June 30, 1997 for the year ended June 30, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000909115
<NAME>              ROSEWOOD CARE CENTER OF EAST PEORIA
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,414
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                        89
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,377
<PP&E>                                          24,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,457
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            65
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,288
<SALES>                                         22,197
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,774
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                       245
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,602
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2010148EN.01000801.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Friedrich G. Barth v Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Forschung

(Case C-542/08) (1)

1

(Freedom of movement for persons - Workers - Equal treatment - Special length-of-service increment for university professors provided for by national legislation held to be incompatible with Community law by a judgment of the Court - Limitation period - Principles of equivalence and effectiveness)

2010/C 148/12

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Friedrich G. Barth

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Forschung

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Interepretation of Art. 39 EC and Art. 7(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community (OJ English Special Edition 1968 (II), p. 475) — National legislation providing for a special length-of-service increment for university professors, the incompatibility of which with Community law, in its earlier version, was established in Case C-224/01 Köbler — Amended legislation which, by suspending the time-limit for taking advantage of the rights at issue only as from the date of that Court judgment, disadvantages professors who were deprived of that increment by reason of the previous legislation incompatible with Community law

Köbler

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

European Union law does not preclude legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings making claims for payment of special length-of-service increments — which a worker who had exercised his rights to freedom of movement was denied prior to the delivery of the judgment of 30 September 2003 in Case C-224/01 Köbler, on the basis of a domestic law incompatible with Community law — subject to a three-year limitation rule.

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 18.4.2009.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IVI Communications, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: January 11, 2004                 /s/ Nyhl Henson
                                       -------------------------
                                           Nyhl Henson, Chief Executive Officer
#### Thomas GASTON, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12153.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

May 18, 1955.

*437Primus C. Wade, Tulsa, , for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

JONES, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal by Thomas Gaston from a conviction sustained in the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Tulsa for driving an automobile on a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor wherein the accused was sentenced to pay a fine of $125.

No brief has been filed and no appearance was made on behalf of the accused at the time the case was assigned for.oral argument. Under such a state of the record pursuant to the rules of this court the judgment and sentence will be affirmed unless such fundamental error is found in the record that it would be grossly unfair to affirm the judgment.

Two policemen of the City of Tulsa testified for the State. The arresting officer saw the, defendant drive his automobile for two blocks on Peoria Street in the City of Tulsa. He detected something wrong with defendant’s driving and stopped him'. Defendant was intoxicated. The officer took defendant to the police station where three tests were given to determine his sobriety or lack of sobriety. The officer who-gave the tests testified that all of these tests showed the accused was intoxicated.

Defendant testified he had been a driver for a bus company for more than six years and had a record clear of any infractions. He testified he had never been arrested in 'his life and was not intoxicated at the time of his arrest. He admitted that more than two hours prior to his arrest he had drunk a glass of beer and had a twenty-fivé cent •drink of whiskey.

' The ¡'evidence was -sufficient to sustain the conviction-and no fundamental or prejudicial error was found. The judgment and sentence of the Municipal Criminal Court of'the City of Tulsa is affirmed.

, BRETT and POWELL, JJ., .concur..
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-80081, 333-33130, 333-47388, 333-70620, 333-98135
and 333-108345) of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2008 relating to the financial statements of Advanced Chip Engineering Technology Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2007, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

Hsingchu,
Taiwan
Republic of China
March 17, 2008

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Bancshares California (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Curtis S. Reis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Curtis S. ReisPresident and Chief Executive Officer




Date: August 12, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of MASTER  DISTRIBUTION  SYSTEMS,  INC.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,  2005,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Harry  P.Beugelink,  Principal  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                 /s/ Harry P. Beugelink
                                                 --------------------------

Date: September 8, 2005                              Harry P. Beugelink

                                                     Principal Financial Officer
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4588 

To establish the Abraham Lincoln Medal for Public Sacrifice, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2017 

Mr. COOK (for himself, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. O’HALLERAN, and Mr. THOMPSON of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To establish the Abraham Lincoln Medal for Public Sacrifice, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Abraham Lincoln 

5 Medal for Public Sacrifice Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT. 

7 (a) MEDAL ESTABLISHED.—There is established a 

8 medal referred to as the ‘‘Abraham Lincoln Medal for 

9 Public Sacrifice’’. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4588 IH

1 (b) AWARD.—The President shall award the medal 

2 established under subsection (a) to each qualified indi3 vidual whom the President determines to be wounded or 

4 killed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act 

5 in circumstances in which the death or wound is— 

6 (1) the result of an attack— 

7 (A) targeted on the qualified individual as 

8 a result of the status of such qualified indi9 vidual as an officer or employee of the Federal 

10 Government; or 

11 (B) that occurs while the qualified indi12 vidual is acting in an official capacity as an of13 ficer or employee of the Federal Government; 

14 and 

15 (2) not the result of willful misconduct or neg16 ligence of such qualified individual. 

17 (c) SPECIAL AUTHORITY FOR RETROACTIVE

18 AWARD.—The President may award the medal established 

19 under subsection (a) to qualified individuals wounded or 

20 killed prior to the date of the enactment of this Act in 

21 circumstances listed in subsection (b). 

22 (d) DESIGN AND STRIKING.—The Secretary of the 

23 Treasury shall design and strike the medal established 

24 under subsection (a) with suitable emblems, devices, and 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4588 IH

1 inscriptions, and ensure that the medal does not closely 

2 resemble the Purple Heart. 

3 (e) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 

4 (1) QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL.—The term ‘‘quali5 fied individual’’ means an officer or employee of the 

6 Federal Government other than a member of the 

7 armed forces. 

8 (2) ARMED FORCES.—The term ‘‘armed forces’’ 

9 has the meaning given the term in section 2101 of 

10 title 5, United States Code. 

11 (3) EMPLOYEE.—The term ‘‘employee’’ has the 

12 meaning given the term in section 2105 of title 5, 

13 United States Code. 

14 (4) OFFICER.—The term ‘‘officer’’ has the 

15 meaning given the term in section 2104 of title 5, 

16 United States Code. 

17 (5) WOUND.—The term ‘‘wound’’ means an in18 jury to any part of the body directly from an outside 

19 force or agent that requires medical treatment. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
#### Robert Dyckes et al., Appellants, v Cedar Road Associates et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

— Appeal by the plaintiffs, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order *794of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.), dated February 19, 1991, as denied their motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Copertino at the Supreme Court. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                      CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

                        [RYDER SCOTT COMPANY LETTERHEAD]

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS



         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our reserve
report regarding the interests of Coho Energy, Inc. (the Company) dated March 7,
2001, relating to estimated quantities of certain of the Company's proved
reserves of oil and gas included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000 into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statement on Form S-3, file number 333-52632 dated December 22, 2000, as amended
January 3, 2001.




/s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

Houston, Texas

April 27, 2001