alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
================================================================================

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tari Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  November 4,  2004


                                                /s/  Theodore Tsagkaris
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Theodore Tsagkaris
                                                Secretary, Treasurer & C.F.O.
                                               (Principal Financial Officer and
                                                Principal Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 31.1****Certificationsfor Form 10-Q**I, Curtis S. Reis, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Alliance Bancshares California;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a—15(e) and15d—15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: May 15, 2007 Name:
Trustee Compensation Schedule



 Exhibit 10.43 
  
  
  
 U-STORE-IT TRUST 
  
 Non-Employee Trustee Fees  
  
  

			
	 Annual
Retainer
	 	$25,000
	 	 
	 Board Meeting Fees (telephonic and
in-person)
	 	$1,000
	 	 
	 Committee Meeting Fees (telephonic and
in-person)
	 	$1,000
	 	 
	 Committee Chair Annual
Retainer
	 	 Audit Committee: $10,000
 Compensation Committee: $7,500
 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:
$5,000

	 	 
	 Lead Trustee Retainer
	 	$10,000
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4581 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4581

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 10, 2018

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop best practices 
for utilizing advanced passenger information and passenger name record 
  data for counterterrorism screening and vetting operations, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Screening and Vetting Passenger 
Exchange Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. PASSENGER SCREENING BEST PRACTICES.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 270 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall develop 
best practices for utilizing advanced passenger information and 
passenger name record data for counterterrorism screening and vetting 
operations.
    (b) Considerations.--The Secretary of Homeland Security shall, to 
the greatest extent practicable--
            (1) make available to certain countries, including visa 
        waiver program countries under section 217 of the Immigration 
        and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187), the best practices 
        required under subsection (a); and
            (2) provide assistance to such countries in implementing 
        such best practices.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 9, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4555 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To authorize the participation in overseas interagency 

counterterrorism task forces of personnel of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4555 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DHS Interagency 

3 Counterterrorism Task Force Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. OVERSEAS INTERAGENCY COUNTERTERRORISM 

5 TASK FORCE PARTICIPATION. 

6 Section 102 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 

7 (6 U.S.C. 112) is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(h) COORDINATION WITH OTHER FEDERAL DE10 PARTMENTS AND AGENCIES OVERSEAS.— 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized 

12 to assign Department personnel to participate in 

13 overseas interagency counterterrorism task forces 

14 to— 

15 ‘‘(A) facilitate the sharing of counterter16 rorism information, and 

17 ‘‘(B) combat the threat of terrorism and 

18 associated risks to the United States stemming 

19 from overseas sources of conflict or terrorism, 

20 as determined by the Secretary. 

21 ‘‘(2) PERSONNEL.—In carrying out this sub22 section, the Secretary may assign personnel from 

23 any component of the Department the Secretary de24 termines necessary to participate in the overseas 

25 counterterrorism task forces referred to in para26 graph (1).’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4555 RFS

1 SEC. 3. ANNUAL REPORTS. 

2 Not later than 18 months after the date of the enact3 ment of this Act and annually thereafter for 3 years, the 

4 Secretary of Homeland Security shall report to the Com5 mittee on Homeland Security, the Committee on Foreign 

6 Affairs, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, 

7 and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of 

8 Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security 

9 and Governmental Affairs, the Committee on Foreign Re10 lations, Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Com11 mittee on Armed Services of the Senate on activities car12 ried out pursuant to subsection (h) of section 102 of the 

13 Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 112), as added 

14 by section 2 of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 9, 

2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION*

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted), Stephen S. Schwartz, Chief Executive Officer of Asyst
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), and Geoffrey G. Ribar, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their
knowledge:

         1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March
31, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the "Annual
Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of
the 30th day of June, 2003.

/s/ Stephen S. Schwartz                         /s/ Geoffrey G. Ribar
________________________________                _____________________________
     Stephen S. Schwartz                           Geoffrey G. Ribar
     Chief Executive Officer                       Chief Financial Officer


* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
  document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
  that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
  statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Asyst and will be
  retained by Asyst and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
  its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL OP-OFA-102]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) 

Filed December 11, 2023 10 a.m. EST Through December 18, 2023 10 a.m. EST 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

## Notice

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxapps.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-II/​public/​action/​eis/​search.*

*EIS No. 20230179, Third Draft Supplemental, USACE, CA,*                     American River Common Features, 2016 Flood Risk Management Project, Sacramento, California Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Subsequent Environmental Impact Report XIV, Comment Period Ends: 02/05/2024, Contact: Guy Romine 916-496-4646.                 

*EIS No. 20230180, Draft, NRCS, WI,*                     Coon Creek Watershed, Comment Period Ends: 02/20/2024, Contact: Joshua Odekirk 262-470-2064.                

*EIS No. 20230181, Draft, NRCS, WI,*                     West Fork Kickapoo Watershed, Comment Period Ends: 02/20/2024, Contact: Joshua Odekirk 262-470-2064.                

*Amended Notice: EIS No. 20230175, Draft, Caltrans, CA,*                     Last Chance Grade Permanent Restoration Project Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement and Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation, Comment Period Ends: 02/13/2024, Contact: Steve Croteau 707-572-7149.                 
      ( print page 88611)    
Revision to FR Notice Published 12/15/2023; Correction to document title at lead agency's request.

Dated: December 18, 2023. 

Julie Smith, 

Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2023-28249 Filed 12-21-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2852

___________ Barbara J. Barth, * * Petitioner, * * Appeal from the Railroad v. * Retirement Board. * Railroad Retirement Board, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. *

___________ Submitted: January 15, 1998 Filed: February 13, 1998

___________ Before LOKEN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
A section of the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C. § 231b(f)(1), contains a complex formula that limits a retired employee’s annuity benefits to a percentage o f “final average monthly compensation.” Final average monthly compensation i s determined “by dividing the total compensation received by such individual in the two calendar years, consecutive o r otherwise, in which [she] was credited with the highest total compensation during the ten-year period ending with December 31 of the year in which such individual’s annuity . . . begins to accrue by 24.”-2-

Barbara J . Barth applied for benefits in 1994. The above formula adversel y affected her benefits becaus e she stopped working in 1986, when her husband retired, which means th at she had worked only fourteen months in the ten years prior to he r annuity beginning to accrue. Barth’s administrative a ppeals were rejected by a hearing officer and the Railroad Retirement Board. She now appeals to this cou rt, as 45 U.S.C. § 231g allows. Barth argues that the statutory formula is “flawed” as applied to this thirty-year railroad employee. To correct the flaw, she contends that we should change the way her “final average monthly compensation” is determined, either by lookin g back ten year s and ten months to calculate the “total compensation” numerator, or by adjusting the twenty-four-month deno minator to fourteen. After careful consideration, we agree with the Board’s General Counsel that the statutory formula is unambiguous in this regard and was correctly applied in this case. Like the Board, we may no t rewrite an unambiguous statute. Accordingly, the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board is affirmed. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2020390EN.01001502.xml

| 16.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — ‘Skonis ir kvapas’ UAB v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

(Case C-674/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco - Directive 2011/64/EU - Article 2(2) - Article 5(1) - Concept of ‘Products consisting in whole or in part of substances other than tobacco’ - Concept of ‘Smoking tobacco’ - Water-pipe tobacco)

(2020/C 390/21)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘Skonis ir kvapas’ UAB

Defendant: Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

Interested party: Vilniaus teritorinė muitinė

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 2 and 5 of Council Directive 2011/64/EU of 21 June 2011 on the structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco must be construed as meaning that water-pipe tobacco, consisting of tobacco, which makes up 24 % thereof, and other substances such as sugar syrup, glycerine, flavourings and preservative, must be regarded as a product ‘consisting ... in part of substances other than tobacco’ and as ‘smoking tobacco’ within the meaning of those provisions and must therefore be regarded, in its entirety and irrespective of the substances other than tobacco contained therein, as smoking tobacco subject to the excise duty on tobacco.

---

(1)  OJ C 413, 9.12.2019.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Advanced Cell Technology, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,William M. Caldwell, IV, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: March 29, 2006 |   |   | /s/ William M. Caldwell, IV |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                  |   |   | William M. Caldwell, IV     |
|                  |   |   | Chief Executive Officer     |

 

1

----
Exhibit 10.2






 



Equity Transfer Agreement












Transferor:Yi Yuan


Transferee:Baichuang Information Consulting (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.







With the consensus after negotiation of the above-mentioned Parties, and agreed by the Shareholders' Meeting of Jiangsu Xuefeng Environmental Project Science and Technology Co., Ltd, the transferor transfers his 7% of the shares (totally 3.10 million Yuan) held in the Company for free, this agreement shall enter into force on the date of signature and seal of both parties, the transferor will not enjoy the rights for being a shareholder and no longer perform the obligations for being a shareholder. The transferee begins to own the rights of shareholders and performs their obligations as a shareholder.







Transferor: Yi Yuan


Transferee: Baichuang Information Consulting (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.












January 11, 2016
# C_2019065EN.01004001.xml

| 18.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/40

---

Action brought on 26 November 2018 — Durand and Others v Parliament

(Case T-702/18)

(2019/C 65/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Pascal Durand (Paris, France) and seven other applicants (represented by: O. Brouwer and E. Raedts, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | declare that the Parliament has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 226(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 198(4) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, by the failure of the Conference of Presidents to submit to the plenary of the European Parliament a proposal for the setting up of a Committee of Inquiry; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the Parliament has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 226(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 198(4) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, by the failure of the Conference of Presidents to submit to the plenary of the European Parliament a proposal for the setting up of a Committee of Inquiry;

| — | in subsidiary order, in the event that the General Court would hold that the letter of 21 September 2018 of the President of the Parliament contains an unequivocal and final position putting an end to the failure to act, annul the decision contained in the letter of 21 September 2018 to refuse to submit to the plenary of the European Parliament a proposal for the setting up of a Committee of Inquiry; |
| --- | --- |

—

in subsidiary order, in the event that the General Court would hold that the letter of 21 September 2018 of the President of the Parliament contains an unequivocal and final position putting an end to the failure to act, annul the decision contained in the letter of 21 September 2018 to refuse to submit to the plenary of the European Parliament a proposal for the setting up of a Committee of Inquiry;

| — | order the Parliament to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs of possible intervening parties. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Parliament to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs of possible intervening parties.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants submit that the Conference of Presidents of the Parliament was required to formulate and send to the plenary of the European Parliament a proposal on the setting up of a Committee of Inquiry, concerning the welfare of animals in transport, as requested by 223 Members of the European Parliament, pursuant to Article 198(4) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament and in accordance with Article 226 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. A decision refusing to do so would breach these same articles.

---