alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Forest - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission Executive Director Jill Foys Email &#160;&#x6a;&#105;&#x6c;&#x6c;&#102;&#x40;&#x6e;&#111;&#x72;&#x74;&#104;&#x77;&#x65;s&#x74;&#x70;a&#x2e;&#111;r&#x67;The post Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Answers to RIA Questions 

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US 

 

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cortney, 

Below are the answers to the two questions from Amanda Lee on the call 

with OMB on Tuesday. 

thanx! 

bob 

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. 

Leader, Energy Strategies Group 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

 

Phone: (919) 541-1045 

Cell: (919) 306-2290 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov 

********************************************************* 

DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

********************************************************* 

1. What are the sources of CO2 reductions? Do these reductions consider 

any emission increases associated with operating emission control 

technologies? 

Answer: The CO2 emission reductions of approximately 15 million metric 

tons annually for the MATS rule are generated using the Integrated 

Planning Model. The small (1%) decrease in CO2 emissions estimated for 

the MATS rule results largely from the change in dispatch -- we are 

projecting a 1% decrease in coal generation and a 3% increase in gas 

generation. Even within the coal generation fleet, there are likely some 

modest generation shifts away from the least efficient units towards 

units that are more efficient to operate. This IPM modeling factors in 

parasitic load of control technologies, so these CO2 reductions are 

indeed net of any CO2 emission increases associated with the energy usage 

of control technologies. 

2. Asked about the inclusion of 2012-2014 CAFE standards. 
Answer: Because there are no emission changes for mobile sources as a 

result of the rule, the base case and control case are identical for this 

category of sources. This results in a net emission change of 0. For this 

reason, the inclusion of the later model year CAFE standards would have 

no impact on the emission changes, costs, or benefits presented in the 

RIA. 

For reference, the modeling is based on MOVES2010a, which incorporates 

new car and light truck greenhouse gas emissions standards affecting 

model years 2012-and-later (published May 7, 2010) and updates effects of 

corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards affecting model years 

2008-2011. MOVES2010a includes reductions in greenhouse gases associated 

with those standards in future calendar years, and small reductions in 

refueling and sulfur-related emissions associated with the reductions in 

vehicle fuel consumption.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5687]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1740
          ROSALIND FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE

  (Mr. DOLD asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. DOLD. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize Rosalind Franklin 
University of Medicine and Science for 100 years of educating and 
training physicians and health care providers.
  Since they opened their doors in 1912, Rosalind Franklin has had a 
nondiscrimination policy in place and has embraced a diverse student 
body. These students have gone on to treat patients throughout the 
world and contribute to vital research.
  At Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, their focus 
is on interprofessional education, where students are encouraged to 
learn and share experiences with members of the health care team 
outside of their chosen profession. This provides a strong foundation 
for graduates of the program and enriches their clinical practice. The 
president, Dr. Michael Welch, has received numerous accolades for his 
leadership, including winning the 10th District Congressional 
Leadership Award for education this year.
  I want to congratulate Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and 
Science for an impressive 100 years of educating some of our best and 
brightest health care providers, and for giving back to the community 
and working to better the world around them.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5711]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. SOUTHERLAND:
        H.R. 6354.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article IV, section 3 of the Constitution of the United 
     States grants Congress the authority to enact this bill.
       The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all 
     needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or 
     other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in 
     this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any 
     Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.
```
Exhibit 4.30


 


B  u  r  d  a  l  e


Financial Limited


BY POST AND
FACSIMILE


 


28th
October 2004


 


GeoLogistics
Limited


Royal
Court


81 Tweedy
Road


Bromley


Kent


BR1 1TW


 




	
  Facsimile no:

  	
   

  	
  020 8626 6855

  
	
  Attention:

  	
   

  	
  George Papageorgehiou

  






 


For itself and on behalf of each of the other Obligors


(as defined in the Facility Agreement (as defined
below))


 


 


Dear Sirs


 


We refer to the facility agreement dated 31 March 2000
between you and ourselves (as supplemented and amended from time to time, the Facility Agreement).


 


Terms defined in the Facility Agreement have the same
meaning when used in this letter.


 


We write to confirm the agreement reached between us
that, on and from the Effective Date (as defined below), the Facility Agreement
shall be deemed amended by deleting the words “31 January 2005” in the
definition of Final Repayment Date in Clause 1.1
of the Facility Agreement and replacing them with the words “30 April 2006”.


 


The Effective Date shall be the date on which we have
received:


 


(A)            a
copy of this letter duly countersigned by you, the other Obligors and GLC; and


 


(B)            a
fee of US$187,500 in consideration of our issuing this letter at your request.


 


Save as set out above, nothing in this letter shall be
deemed to be an amendment to the terms of any Finance Document or a waiver or
consent by Burdale to any breach or potential breach (present or future) of any
provision of the Finance Documents or any waiver of a Default or Event of
Default (howsoever described).


 


This letter is Finance Document and
shall be governed by English law.


 


	
  Yours faithfully,

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]

  
	
  For and on behalf of

  
	
  BURDALE FINANCIAL LIMITED

  



 


 





















 


	
  Accepted and agreed:

  
	
   

  
	
  The Company

  
	
   

  
	
  GEOLOGISTIC LIMITED

  
	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ G. Papageorgehiou

  
	
   

  	
  G. Papageorgehiou – Director

  
	
   

  
	
  The Obligors

  
	
   

  
	
  GEOLOGISTICS LIMITED

  
	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ G. Papageorgehiou

  
	
   

  
	
  ACI INC. LIMITED

  
	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ G. Papageorgehiou

  
	
   

  
	
  LEP TRANSPORT LIMITED

  
	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ G. Papageorgehiou

  
	
   

  
	
  GEOLOGISTICS EXPO SERVICES
  LIMITED

  
	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ G. Papageorgehiou

  



 


 


We, GeoLogistics Corporation, confirm, acknowledge and
agree (with such confirmation, acknowledgement and agreement taking effect as a
deed) that the guarantee and indemnity given by us under the guarantee and
indemnity dated 31 March 2000 in favour of Burdale remains in full force and
effect and extends to guarantee the obligations of GeoLogistics Limited to
Burdale as amended by this letter.


 


GEOLOGISTICS CORPORATION


 


	
  By: /s/ Stephen P. Bishop

  
	
   

  
	
  Name: Stephen P. Bishop

  
	
   

  
	
  Title: EUP & CFO

  



 


 


2
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4451 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a 

five-year extension to the homeless veterans reintegration 

programs and to provide clarification regarding eligibility 

for services under such programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4451 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homeless Veterans’ 

3 Reintegration Programs Reauthorization Act of 2018’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF HOMELESS VETERANS RE5 INTEGRATION PROGRAMS. 

6 (a) FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF HOMELESS VET7 ERANS REINTEGRATION PROGRAMS.—Section 

8 2021(e)(1)(F) of title 38, United States Code, is amended 

9 by striking ‘‘2018’’ and inserting ‘‘2022’’. 

10 (b) FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF HOMELESS WOMEN

11 VETERANS AND HOMELESS VETERANS WITH CHILDREN

12 REINTEGRATION GRANT PROGRAM.—Section 2021A(f)(1) 

13 of such title is amended by striking ‘‘2018’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘2022’’. 

15 (c) CLARIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR SERVICES

16 UNDER HOMELESS VETERANS REINTEGRATION PRO17 GRAMS.—Section 2021(a) of such title is amended by 

18 striking ‘‘reintegration of homeless veterans into the labor 

19 force.’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘reintegration into the 

20 labor force of— 

21 ‘‘(1) homeless veterans (including veterans who 

22 were homeless but found housing during the 60-day 

23 period preceding the date on which the veteran be24 gins to participate in a program under this section); 

25 ‘‘(2) veterans participating in the Department 

26 of Veterans Affairs supported housing program for 
3 

•HR 4451 EH

1 which rental assistance is provided pursuant to sec2 tion 8(o)(19) of the United States Housing Act of 

3 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(19)) or the Tribal HUD– 

4 VA Supportive Housing (Tribal HUD–VASH) pro5 gram; 

6 ‘‘(3) Indians who are veterans and receiving as7 sistance under the Native American Housing Assist8 ance and Self Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 

9 4101 et seq.); 

10 ‘‘(4) veterans described in section 2023(e) of 

11 this title or any other veterans who are transitioning 

12 from being incarcerated; and 

13 ‘‘(5) veterans participating in the Department 

14 of Veterans Affairs rapid rehousing and prevention 

15 program authorized in section 2044 of this title.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4451 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide 

programs. tion regarding eligibility for services under such reintegration programs and to provide clarificafor a five-year extension to the homeless veterans
# C_2009044EN.01002502.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/25

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg (Germany) lodged on 1 October 2008 — Arnold and Johann Harms, in their capacity as a partnership under German civil law v Freerk Heidinga

(Case C-434/08)

(2009/C 44/42)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg (Germany)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Arnold and Johann Harms, in their capacity as a partnership under German civil law

Applicants:

Defendant: Freerk Heidinga

Defendant:

Question referred

Is Article 46(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy (1) and establishing certain support schemes for farmers to be interpreted as meaning that the following contractual arrangements are incompatible with that provision and hence invalid: contractual arrangements outwardly effecting a complete and definitive transfer of payment entitlements, but stipulating — according to an internal agreement between the parties — that the seller is to remain the beneficial owner of those payment entitlements, whereby the purchaser, in his capacity as the person formally entitled to them, is to activate the payment entitlements through cultivation of the corresponding land and to pass on to the seller the full amount of the single payments made to him, or contractual arrangements pursuant to which land premiums are transferred to the purchaser in such a way that he remains under an ongoing obligation to pay to the seller a part of the single payments (the farm-specific part), at any rate once those payments have been activated and disbursed?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 270, p. 1.

1

---
Cfhe TOWN OF NORWOOD 

Commonwealth o Ma ssachusttts :___ _______________________ _:__ ___ ______________________ ______ _ 

OFFICE ADDRESS 

12 5 Access Road 

Norwood, MA 02062 

November 4, 2010 

William Haney 

415 Beacon Street 

Boston, MA 02115 

Norwood Memorial Airport 

Russ Maguire, A.A.E., ACE, Airport Manager 

CERTIFIED MAIL 

MAILING ADDRESS 

125 Access Road 

Norwood, MA 02062 

RE: Unauthorized Helicopter Operations; DC-3 Apron, Norwood Airport 

Dear Bill: 

On Saturday, October 23, 2010, it was brought to my attention by the Assistant Airport 

Manager, Mark Raymond, that you had been attempting to conduct helicopter operations 

from the airport's DC-3 apron. Mr. Raymond was correct in informing you that those 

operations are not authorized on the DC-3 apron. In fact, helicopter operations from that 

apron have never been authorized-to any parties-in the 15+ years that I've been the 

airport manager here at Norwood. 

At the present time, the DC-3 apron is under direct Town control, with no leasehold(s). I 

can therefore say unequivocally that any authorization, or perceived authorization, 

granted to you for flight operations to/from the DC-3 apron is unfounded. 

However, as I've discussed with you in the past, you're welcome to consider operating 

from a leased helicopter parking circle on the south end of the north/south taxi-lane. The 

use restrictions for this operating area do require the helicopter owner to remove the 

helicopter prior to snow events, so that the paved surface can be plowed. Also, as you 

know, the helicopter would require towing from time to time, to include during the 

aforementioned time periods. The lease rate for a helicopter parking circle is $265 per 

quarter and would require you to enter into a written lease with the Norwood Airport 

Commission. 

In closing, during the time in which Mr. Raymond contacted me on October 23, he was 

being subjected to a heated verbal assault and reproach by you; this, after you were 

informed by him that you could not operate your helicopter from the DC-3 apron. It bears 

underscoring that, in my absence, Mr. Raymond is the airport manager. He furthermore 

Phone: (781) 255-5615 I Fax: (781) 255-5617 I nnaguire@norwoodma.gov I VOICE!ITY -Use Phone Rela) 
represents the airport authority, which is the Norwood Airport Commission. To preserve 

the peace, Mr. Raymond did contact the Norwood Police. I would ask that in the future, 

Bill, you present a more controlled demeanor, which, in tum, will invite a more 

productive exchange . 

Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

~~~ Russ Maguire, Manager 

Norwood Memorial Airport 

CC: Norwood Airport Commission 

®
<PAGE>   1






                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1



                       IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   CALCULATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

   (Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

BASIC                                                       Year ended December 31,
-----                                                      -------------------------
                                                             2000           1999
                                                             ----           ----
                                                           (audited)     (audited)
<S>                                                       <C>           <C>
Net income                                                $     44,225  $      3,207

Common shares outstanding at January 1                      25,033,932    25,033,932
Common shares outstanding at December 31                    25,039,713    25,033,932
Weighted average common shares outstanding                  25,034,414    25,033,932


Net income per common share                                      $1.77         $0.13

DILUTED
-------
Net income                                                $     44,225    $    3,207

Weighted average common shares outstanding                  25,034,414    25,033,932
Dilutive effect of share options                               463,257       954,184

                                                         ----------------------------
Total                                                       25,497,671    25,988,116
                                                         ----------------------------

Net income per common share                                      $1.73         $0.12
</TABLE>



                                       1
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 116 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5630]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. GOHMERT:
        H.R. 6261.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 of the U.S. Constitution 
     sets forth the power of appropriations states ``No Money 
     shall be drawn from the Treasury but in Consequence of 
     Appropriations made by Law. . . .''
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 states that ``The Congress 
     shall have the Power. . . to pay the Debts and provide for 
     the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States . 
     . .''
       Article I, Section 8, Clauses 12 and 13 state that Congress 
     shall have the power ``to raise and support Armies. . .'' and 
     ``to provide and maintain a Navy.''
```
#### Park Ridge Hospital, Inc., Respondent, v W. Burton Richardson, as Director of Social Services for County of Monroe, Appellant.

— Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. It is well established that a hospital may bring a plenary action in its own right against the agency designated to declare Medicaid eligibility *(see, Community-General Hosp. v Stone,*139 AD2d 948, *Iv dismissed*72 NY2d 909; *Long Beach Mem. Nursing Home v D’Elia,*108 AD2d 901, 902; *Calvary Hosp. v D’Elia,*95 AD2d 817; *Matter of North Shore Univ. Hosp. v D’Elia,*71 AD2d 991, 992, *Iv denied*48 NY2d 604).

Supreme Court erred, however, in granting plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment. The cross motion was premature since issue had not been joined *(see,*CPLR 3212 [a]; *City of Rochester v Chiarella,*65 NY2d 92, 101; *Fargo v Watertown Educ. Assn.,*175 AD2d 633 [decided herewith]) and, in any event, the papers submitted in support of the cross motion were insufficient to establish plaintiff’s entitlement to judgment in its favor as a matter of law *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562; *Matter of Badenhausen v New York State Dept. of Social Servs.,*151 AD2d 913, 914; *cf., Community-General Hosp. v Stone, supra).*We are unable to conclude that the elderly patients to whom plaintiff provided hospital services were, as a matter of law, eligible for Medicaid benefits. (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J. — Dismiss Complaint.) Present— Boomer, J. P., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ. *[See,*147 Mise 2d 283.]
# C_2010288EN.01003502.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Wilfer v OHIM (Representation of the head of a guitar)

(Case T-458/08) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for a Community figurative mark representing the head of a guitar in silver, grey and brown - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Examination of the facts of its own motion - Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009) - Obligation to state reasons - The first sentence of Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now the first sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) - Equal treatment)

(2010/C 288/67)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Hans-Peter Wilfer (Markeneukirchen, Germany) (represented by: A. Kockläuner, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 July 2008 (Case R 78/2007-4), concerning the registration as a Community trade mark of the figurative sign representing the head of a guitar in the colours silver, grey and brown.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hans-Peter Wilfer to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hans-Peter Wilfer to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 10.1.2008.

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4277 

To ensure that the Federal share of the costs of certain assistance relating 

to Hurricanes Irma and Maria is 100 percent, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 7, 2017 

Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ (for himself and Mr. ESPAILLAT) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To ensure that the Federal share of the costs of certain 

assistance relating to Hurricanes Irma and Maria is 

100 percent, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Waiver of Emergency 

5 Payments Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FEDERAL SHARE OF ASSISTANCE. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including 

8 any agreement, the Federal share of assistance, including 

9 direct Federal assistance, provided for Puerto Rico in conVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:50 Nov 09, 2017 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4277.IH H4277

dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4277 IH

1 nection with Hurricanes Irma and Maria under sections 

2 403, 404, 406, 407, and 408 of the Robert T. Stafford 

3 Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

4 5170b, 5170c, 5172, 5173, and 5174) shall be 100 per5 cent of the eligible costs under such sections. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS