alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008092EN.01003401.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/34

---

Action brought on 22 January 2008 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

(Case T-39/08)

(2008/C 92/69)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Applicant

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Commission to evaluate the applicant's bid as not successful and award the contract to the successful contractor; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Commission to evaluate the applicant's bid as not successful and award the contract to the successful contractor;

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant's damages suffered on account of the tendering procedure in question for an amount of EUR 441 564,50; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant's damages suffered on account of the tendering procedure in question for an amount of EUR 441 564,50;

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant's legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application, even if the current application is rejected; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant's legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application, even if the current application is rejected;

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant's legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant's legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant submitted a bid in response to the defendant's call for an open tender concerning hosting, management, enhancement, promotion and maintenance of the Commission's Internet portal on eLearning (elearningeuropa.info) (OJ 2007/S 87-105977). The applicant contests the defendant's decision of 12 November 2007 rejecting the applicant's bid and informing the applicant that the contract would be awarded to another tenderer. The applicant further requests compensation for the alleged damages caused by the tender procedure.

In support of its application, the applicant submits that the defendant committed manifest errors of assessment and failed to state reasons in accordance with Article 253 EC. Furthermore, the applicant alleges that the defendant confused evaluation criteria with award criteria when evaluating the bids and used evaluation criteria that were not disclosed to the tenderers before the deadline for submitting the offers. Finally, the applicant contends that the defendant violated the principle of non-discrimination.

---
# C_2010113EN.01004301.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Monoscoop v OHIM (SUDOKU SAMURAI BINGO)

(Case T-564/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark SUDOKU SAMURAI BINGO - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 113/68

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Monoscoop BV (Alkmaar, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: Ó. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 September 2008 (Case R 816/2008-2) concerning an application for registration of the word mark SUDOKU SAMURAI BINGO as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Monoscoop BV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Monoscoop BV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009.

1

---
#### Mark T. Garofalo, Appellant, v Henrietta Italia, Inc., Doing Business as Coco’s Carousel, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Mem*581orandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendant Henrietta Italia’s (Coco’s) motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs cause of action for negligence. Although Coco’s was required to exercise reasonable care for the protection of its patrons, an unexpected altercation between patrons, such as that between plaintiff and defendant Schneider, is not a situation that Coco’s could reasonably be expected to have anticipated or prevented (see, *Lindskog v Southland Rest.,*160 AD2d 842; *Campbell v Step/Lind Rest. Corp.,*143 AD2d 111; *Silver v Sheraton-Smithtown Inn,*121 AD2d 711). Plaintiff submitted no evidence rebutting Coco’s showing that, prior to the altercation with plaintiff, Schneider gave no indication that he posed a threat to any of its patrons. Moreover, Coco’s was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiffs Dram Shop Act cause of action because plaintiff failed to demonstrate the existence of any triable issue of fact whether Schneider had been actually or apparently intoxicated when served by Coco’s *(see, Terbush v Buchman,*147 AD2d 826; *Gonyea v Folger,*133 AD2d 964; *see also,*General Obligations Law § 11-101; *Lippman v Hines,*138 AD2d 845). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

November 9, 2005

U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission450 Fifth Street, N. W.Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The certification set forth below is being submittedto the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complyingwith Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Thiscertification is not to be deemed to be filed pursuant to the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q(the “Report”) accompanying this letter and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

I, J. William Holden, III, the Senior VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of Mirant Americas Generation, LLC (the “Company”),certify that, subject to the qualifications noted below, to the best of myknowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mirant AmericasGeneration, LLC.
| Name:    | /s/ J. WILLIAM  HOLDEN, III                    |     |
|----------|-----------------------------------------------------|----------|
| * * | *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* | * * |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Mirant Americas Generation, LLC andwill be retained by Mirant Americas Generation, LLC and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

64

----
# C_2008022EN.01005001.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/50

---

Appeal brought on 30 November 2007 by Nikos Giannopoulos against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 20 September 2007 in Case F-111/06, Giannopoulos v Council

(Case T-436/07 P)

(2008/C 22/94)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Nikos Giannopoulos (Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium) (represented by S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, Lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

| — | declare the present appeal admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the present appeal admissible;

| — | annul the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 20 September 2007 in Case F-111/06; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 20 September 2007 in Case F-111/06;

| — | uphold the claims for annulment and for compensation submitted by the appellant at first instance; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the claims for annulment and for compensation submitted by the appellant at first instance;

| — | order the defendant at first instance to pay all the costs of the proceedings at first instance and on appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant at first instance to pay all the costs of the proceedings at first instance and on appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his appeal, the appellant puts forward pleas in law alleging failures to state reasons and manifest errors of assessment in the response given by the Civil Service Tribunal in relation to the first plea in law, alleging breach of Article 31(2) of the Staff Regulations, which the appellant put forward in the proceedings at first instance.

---
EXHIBIT 13.1

906 Certification

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company
Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Rong Guangdao, the Chairman of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) , as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Date: June 28, 2007



By:

/s/ Rong GuangdaoName:

Rong GuangdaoTitle:

Chairman
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (the Company) for the period
ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John W. Gibson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|                                      
|/s/ John W. Gibson                    
|John W. Gibson Chief Executive
Officer

February 28, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to ONEOK Partners, L.P. and will be retained by ONEOK Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order filed, June 26, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00374-CV

____________

THREE THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($3,000.00) IN US CURRENCY, 

ET AL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 149th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 66649

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 28, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The 

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed 

timely, we issue the following order.

We order Stacy Thomas, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,329-02

EX PARTE LEONARDO VASQUEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2012-DCR-2913-B IN THE 138 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM CAMERON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

kidnapping and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and

conclusions of law.

The trial court has determined that counsel was timely appointed, but was never notified of

that appointment, so did not take steps to perfect an appeal of this cause. The trial court recommends
2

granting an out-of-time appeal. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-oftime appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 2012-DCR-2913 from the 138 District th

Court of Cameron County due to a breakdown in the system. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2003). 

Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so

that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the

issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant

is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence

had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should

Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of

appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: January 25, 2017

Do not publish
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION FOR ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB



I, James F. Laird, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this
report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 30, 2006 |  | /S/    JAMES F. LAIRD  
|                     |  | James F. Laird         
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 89452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28541]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than January 26, 2024.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#692a0604040c071d1a4708191905000a081d0006071a290a0100470f1b0b47061b0e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9eac6c4c4ccc7ddda87c8d9d9c5c0cac8ddc0c6c7dae9cac1c087cfdbcb87c6dbce">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. SolvTrust Financial Corporation, Melrose Park, Illinois; to 
become a bank holding company by acquiring American Bancorp of 
Illinois, Oak Brook, Illinois, and thereby indirectly acquiring Pan 
American Bank and Trust, Melrose Park, Illinois.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-28541 Filed 12-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James H. McCONNELL and James H. Dondich, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 74-3248.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 16, 1976.

John L. Briggs, U. S. Atty., D. Frank Winkles, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., Claude H. Tison, Jr., Asst. Ü. S. Atty., Tampa, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.'

Robert A. Harper, Jr., Gainesville, Fla., for McConnell.

Morton Berger, White Plains, N. Y., for Dondich.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge, and MILLER,* Associate Judge.

*

 Of the U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

In light of our opinion today in *United States v. Morrow,*537 F.2d 120 (5 Cir. 1976), the Government’s appeal in the instant case is moot.