alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
23.1




















CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED


PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-81214) pertaining to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust of
Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-07147) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of Tandy Leather Factory,
Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.







WEAVER
AND TIDWELL, L.L.P.





Fort
Worth, Texas


March 31,
2009
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of Voyager One, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
Lichter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
         operations of the Company.

/s/ John Lichter
-------------------------------------
John Lichter
Chief Executive Officer
May 20, 2004






<PAGE>

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of Voyager One, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sebastien DuFort, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
         operations of the Company.

/s/ Sebastien DuFort
-------------------------------------
Sebastien DuFort
President and Acting Chief Financial Officer
May 20, 2004
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1452]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       HONORING GEORGE LANGSTAFF

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. JIM COOPER

                              of tennessee

                    in the house of representatives

                       Monday, September 10, 2012

  Mr. COOPER. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to George 
Langstaff, a man whose dedication to mentoring economically 
disadvantaged students in Middle Tennessee has resulted in more than 
340 students obtaining a post-high school education.
  After a very successful career in the footwear industry, Mr. 
Langstaff recognized the need to help at-risk young adults obtain a 
college education. In 1995, he partnered with a Nashville nonprofit to 
found The Sponsors Scholarship Program. To date, the program that Mr. 
Langstaff established has raised more than $2.2 million dedicated to 
scholarships for financially disadvantaged young people.
  For more than 15 years, The Sponsors Scholarship Program and its 
hundreds of volunteers have provided college counseling, mentoring and 
college scholarships to capable high school students in Middle 
Tennessee.
  Today, I join the citizens of my district in honoring George 
Langstaff for his tireless commitment to ensuring that financially 
challenged young people from Middle Tennessee have the opportunity 
obtain a complete education.
  We need more citizens like George Langstaff. His Volunteer spirit 
makes all Tennesseans proud, and a generation of young people 
successful.

                          ____________________
```
# Greene - Appalachian Regional Commission

- First Tennessee Development District Executive Director Chris Craig &#160;Email &#x63;&#99;r&#x61;&#x69;&#103;&#64;&#x66;&#x74;&#100;d&#x2e;&#111;r&#x67;The post First Tennessee Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-1890

___________________________

Jay Driesen, Rustic Home Builders LLC

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Michael J. Smith; Margaret A. Smith; Steven G. Haugaard; Cadwell, Sanford,

Deibert & Garry, LLP; Stephen Landon; Brett Lovrien; Michael A. Henderson;

James S. Simko; Peter Bendorf; Jim Loup; South Dakota Unified Judicial System;

Moody County Clerk; Lillian Relf; Lisa Johnson, Deputy Clerk; David R.

Gienapp, Honorable; Tim D. Tucker, Honorable; David Gilbertson, Chief Justice;

John K. Konenkamp, Justice; Steven L. Zinter, Justice; Glen A. Severson, Justice;

Lori S. Wilbur, Justice; Ruth Kooima; Michael J. Jacobsma; John M. Murray;

Iowa Judicial Branch; Don E.Courtney; JamesD.Scott; JeffreyL.Poulson, Honorable

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

Other Possible Defendants, Unknown at this time

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant

Brad Van Heuvelen

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City

____________
 Submitted: November 24, 2014

Filed: November 28, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Jay Driesen appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil complaint 1

asserting that his rights were violated in connection with prior state-court

proceedings. Upon careful de novo review, we agree with the district court that it

lacked subject matter jurisdiction. See Minch Family LLLP v. Buffalo-Red River

Watershed Dist., 628 F.3d 960, 965 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo standard of review). We

also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Driesen’s

request for leave to amend his complaint. See Horras v. Am. Capital Strategies, Ltd.,

729 F.3d 798, 804 (8th Cir. 2013) (district court has considerable discretion to deny

post-judgment motion for leave to amend), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 1346 (2014).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the

1

Northern District of Iowa.

-2-
**Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 November 2008 – Kastrinaki v AHEPA**

**(Joined Cases C‐180/08 and C-186/08)**

First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure – Directive 89/48/EEC – Recognition of diplomas – Studies completed in an ‘independent study centre’ not recognised as an educational establishment by the host Member State
Psychologist

Freedom of movement for persons – Freedom of establishment – Workers – Recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years’
duration – Directive 89/48 – Psychologist (Council Directive 89/48, Art. 3) (see paras 50-53, operative part)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Reference for a preliminary ruling – Diikitiko Efetio Thessalonikis – Interpretation of Articles 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years’ duration (OJ 1989 L 19, p. 16) – Interpretation of Article 39(1) EC, the first paragraph of Article 10 EC and Articles 43, 47(1), 49, 55, 149 and 150 EC – National of a Member State who has pursued a regulated profession in the host Member State before and after recognition of professional equivalence resulting from academic qualifications obtained in another Member State – Prior completion of part of university studies, under a franchising agreement, in an institution not recognised as an educational establishment by the host Member State – Possibility, by reason of a refusal to recognise such qualifications, of excluding a worker from professional activity. |

**Operative part**

The competent authorities of a host Member State are required, under Article 3 of Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December
1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education
and training of at least three years’ duration, to permit a national of a Member State who holds a diploma within the meaning
of that directive issued by a competent authority of another Member State to pursue his profession on the same conditions
as apply to holders of national diplomas even though that diploma

–        attests to education and training received, in whole or in part, at an establishment located in the host Member State which,
according to the legislation of that State, is not recognised as an educational establishment, and

–        has not been homologated by the competent national authorities.
#### JORDAN BUS COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Gus WAFER, Defendant in Error.

No. 36173.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Nov. 9, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 14, 1954.

Application for Leave to File Second Petition for Rehearing Denied Jan. 7, 1955.

*234O. A. Brewer, Hugo, for plaintiff in error.

Hal Welch, Hugo, Don Welch, Don E. Welch, Madill, for defendant in error.

O’NEAL, Justice.

This case is a companion case to the case of Jordan Bus Company v. Wafer, No. 36,172, Okl., 278 P.2d 228. Every issue of fact in the two cases are identical, and the principle of law announced in our opinion in Jordan Bus Company v. Wafer, No. 36,172, is applicable here.

Upon the authority of the decision in Cause No. 36,172, the application and motion of the defendant in error, Gus Wafer, to dismiss the appeal, is granted.

JOHNSON, V. C. J., and CORN, ARNOLD and PERDUE, JJ., concur.

HALLEY, C. J., and DAVISON, WILLIAMS and BLACKBIRD, JJ., dissent.

WELCH, J., having certified his disqualification in this case, Honorable C. B. PER-DUE, Wilburton, Oklahoma, was appointed special Justice in his stead.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S5691]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 prayer

  The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, offered the following prayer:
  Let us pray.
  Creator God, who has nurtured us throughout the seasons of our 
sojourn, give to the Members of this body the love, strength, and 
wisdom to do Your will. Keep them walking in the paths of righteousness 
and let them feel Your abiding presence in times of joy and sadness. 
Lord, empower them to hold fast to the good will that unites them, 
making them instruments of Your purposes to bring peace in our days, 
peace to our souls, peace to our families, peace to our country, and 
peace among nations. May they be moved by Your majesty and motivated by 
the magnitude of the responsibilities You have entrusted to them.
  We pray in Your mighty Name. Amen.

                          ____________________
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; NAD CT.                    

*Date:*                         February 7, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Bita Nakhai, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7701,                         *nakhaib@nia.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 89721)    
Dated: December 22, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-28682 Filed 12-27-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 3, 2023

No. 04-22-00857-CV

STUDIO E. ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIORS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

Emily LEHMBERG,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-10649

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The trial court clerk has filed a notification of late record, stating that appellant has failed 

to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record and that appellant is 

not entitled to preparation of the clerk’s record without paying the fee.

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before 

January 19, 2023, that the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the 

clerk’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed 

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing 

dismissal of appeal if appellant fails to comply with an order of this court).

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of January, 2023.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vyteris Holdings (Nevada), Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Vincent De Caprio, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
                Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of
                operations of the Company for the periods presented.


        August 19, 2005                         /s/ Vincent De Caprio
                                                ---------------------
                                                    Vincent De Caprio
                                                    Chief Executive Officer




This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
# C_2008064EN.01003001.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/30

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Kammarrätten i Stockholm (Sweden) lodged on 21 January 2008 — Migrationsverket v Edgar Petrosian, Nelli Petrosian, Svetlana Petrosian, David Petrosian, Maxime Petrosian

(Case C-19/08)

(2008/C 64/43)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Kammarrätten i Stockholm

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Migrationsverket

Applicant:

Defendants: Edgar Petrosian, Nelli Petrosian, Svetlana Petrosian, David Petrosian, Maxime Petrosian

Defendants:

Question referred

Are Article 20(1)(d) and Article 20(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 (the Dublin Regulation) (1) to be interpreted as meaning that responsibility for the examination of an application for asylum passes to the Member State where the application was lodged if the transfer is not carried out within six months after a temporary decision has been made to suspend the transfer and irrespective of when the final decision is made on whether the transfer is to be carried out?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 50, 25.2.2003, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 249 (Friday, December 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 90217-90218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28737]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

[[Page 90218]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 29, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 21, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 152 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-131, CP2024-137.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-28737 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### In the Matter of Salvatore Zunno et al., Respondents, v Madeline S. Fein, Appellant, and Board of Elections in the *936City of New York, Respondent.

— In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Madeline S. Fein as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 12, 1991, for the nomination of that party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the New York City Council for the 46th Councilmanic District, in which the appellant counterclaimed for validation, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated August 26, 1991, which granted the application to invalidate and dismissed the counterclaim.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly invalidated those signatures which were witnessed by notaries public who had not taken the oaths of the signators nor obtained any statements from them as to the truth of the statements to which they subscribed their names *(see, Matter of Donnelly v Dowd,*12 NY2d 651; *Matter of Helfand v Meisser,*30 AD2d 670, *affd*22 NY2d 762; *cf., Matter of Andolfi v Rohl,*83 AD2d 890). The Supreme Court also properly invalidated the signatures witnessed by a subscribing witness who signed the subscribing witness statement without filling in the number of signatures witnessed *(see, Matter of Sheldon v Sperber,*45 NY2d 788). Consequently, the appellant’s designating petition failed to contain a sufficient number of valid signatures. The appellant’s remaining contentions do not warrant a contrary result. Kunzeman, J. P., Fiber, Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 8  Significant Subsidiaries

Alumina Limiteds significant subsidiaries are as follows:



| |  |  | Alumina International Holdings Pty Ltd  Incorporated in Australia this company holds all entities in the Alumina Groups AWAC joint venture
(except for Alcoa of Australia Ltd, see below) through its indirect 40% interest in each of Alcoa World Alumina LLC, Alcoa Caribbean Holdings LLC, Alumina Espanola SA, Alcoa Chemie Nederland BV, Alcoa Chemie GMBH and Abalco SA. It is wholly owned by
Alumina.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Alumina Finance Limited  Incorporated in Australia this company issued US$350,000,000 2% guaranteed convertible bonds due to mature in 2013 and
convertible into fully paid ordinary shares in the share capital of Alumina Limited.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------