alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 7

- 0 0 8 77

- C V

Style: Robert M. Fenlon v. Harris County , et al.

Date motion filed * : Jan uary 8 , 201 8

Type of motion: Motion for a n E xtension of T ime to Pay for Appellate Records Fees

Party filing motion: Pro Se Appellant

Document to be filed: Evidence of Payment or Arrangement to Pay for Clerk ’ s Record

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: December 11 , 201 7 (record due date)

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current D ue D ate: January 1 2, 201 8

Date Requested: N/A ( 3 0 days requested )

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

 I f document is to be filed, document due: February 12

, 201 8

.  Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Because appellant has paid for the filing and reporter’s record fee s and states that he

h as made a down payment on the clerk’s record fee, his motion for a 30

- day

extension of time to file evidence of payment arrangements for the clerk’s record fee is

granted until February 12, 2018

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4.1(a), 35.3 (a)(2). To the

e xtent that a ppellant’s motion also seeks an e xtension of time to pay for the reporter’s

record fee, that is dismissed as moot because this Court granted the reporter’s

extension of time to file that record on January 9, 2018, until January 18, 2018. See id.

35.3 (b)(3), (c).

Judge’ s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes



Date: January 1 8 , 2018
# Fleming - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Buffalo Trace Area Development District Executive Director Amy Kennedy Email a&#107;&#101;&#x6e;&#x6e;e&#100;&#121;&#x40;&#x62;&#x74;a&#100;&#100;&#x2e;&#x63;omThe post Buffalo Trace Area Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# Calhoun - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Three Rivers Planning and Development District Executive Director Vernon R. Kelley III Email v&#114;&#107;&#x40;&#x74;r&#112;&#100;&#x64;&#x2e;&#x63;o&#109;The post Three Rivers Planning and Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

November 13, 2006

U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission450 Fifth Street, N. W.Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The certification set forth below is being submittedto the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complyingwith Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode. This certification is not to be deemed to be filed pursuant to theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) accompanying this letter and isnot to be incorporated by reference into any filing, whether made before orafter the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in suchfiling.

I, J. WilliamHolden, III, the Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer of Mirant Americas Generation, LLC (the “Company”), certifythat, to the best of my knowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of Mirant Americas Generation, LLC.
| Name:    | /s/ J. WILLIAM  HOLDEN, III                           |   |
|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|     | J. William Holden, III                                |   |
| * * | *Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  and Treasurer* |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Mirant Americas Generation, LLCand will be retained by Mirant Americas Generation, LLC and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of GRANT HAYWARD,  INC. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  September  30,  2005 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kevin
Ericksteen,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Kevin Ericksteen
                                                   --------------------------
Date: November 10, 2005                                Kevin Ericksteen
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                       12
<PAGE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit (3)-3

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                            UNITED RESTAURANTS, INC.





FIRST: That by a Unanimous Written Consent of the Board of Directors of United
Restaurants, Inc., a Delaware corporation, resolutions were duly adopted setting
forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of said
corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and providing that the
written consent of the stockholders to such amendment should be obtained. The
resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

               RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of this
        corporation be amended by changing the Article thereof numbered "First"
        so that, as amended, said Article shall be and read as follows: "The
        name of the corporation is Grand Havana Enterprises, Inc."

SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, the
written consent of the stockholders of the corporation was obtained in
accordance with Section 228 of the General Corporation Law, by which consent the
necessary number of shares as required by statute consented to the amendment,
and written notice of action taken by such stockholders' consent has been given
as provided in Section 228 of the General Corporation Law.

THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

FOURTH: That the capital of said corporation shall not be reduced under or by
reason of said amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by
Harry Shuster, an authorized officer, this 22nd day of February, 1997.



                                            By: /s/ Harry Shuster
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                Harry Shuster
# C_2011319EN.01001201.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 September 2011 — Berliner Institut für Vegleichende Sozialforschung v Commission

(Case T-34/08) (1)

1

(Financial assistance paid in the context of the Daphné II program - Determination of the amount to be paid to the beneficiary - Erroneous assessment)

2011/C 319/21

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: initially, B. Hening, then U. Claus and, finally, S. Reichmann and L.-J. Schmidt, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, S. Grünheid and B. Simon, then S. Grünheid and F. Dintilhac, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the annulment of the Commission's decision of 16 November 2007 concerning the Commission's partial non-recognition of the costs incurred by the applicant in the context of Daphné Grant Agreement JAI/DAP/2004-2/052/W.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Commission's decision of 16 November 2007 concerning its partial non-recognition of the costs incurred by Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung eV in the context of Daphné Grant Agreement JAI/DAP/2004-2/052/W in so far as concerns the expenses relating to items A6, A39, A40, A41, A43 and E41; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Commission's decision of 16 November 2007 concerning its partial non-recognition of the costs incurred by Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung eV in the context of Daphné Grant Agreement JAI/DAP/2004-2/052/W in so far as concerns the expenses relating to items A6, A39, A40, A41, A43 and E41;

| 2. | Orders Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung to bear two thirds of its own costs and two thirds of the costs incurred by the European Commission. The Commission shall bear a third of its own costs and a third of the costs incurred by Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung to bear two thirds of its own costs and two thirds of the costs incurred by the European Commission. The Commission shall bear a third of its own costs and a third of the costs incurred by Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 29.3.2008.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-8030

JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

BRIAN P. STIRLING; D. EASTRIDGE; OTHERS,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Beaufort. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(9:15-cv-02670-DCN)

Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 26, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Roosevelt Baccus, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John Roosevelt Baccus appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without 

prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Baccus v. Stirling, No. 9:15-cv-02670-DCN 

(D.S.C. filed Dec. 9, 2015; entered Dec. 10, 2015). We deny all 

of Baccus’s pending motions, including his motions for bail, to 

file an amicus curiae brief, to compel the production of 

videotapes, for a transcript at government expense, for 

disposition of informal briefing, and for judicial notice of his 

informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Rockcastle - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Cumberland Valley Area Development District Executive Director Whitney Chesnut Email &#119;&#x63;h&#x65;s&#116;&#x6e;&#117;&#x74;&#64;&#99;&#x76;&#97;&#x64;d&#x2e;&#x6f;&#114;&#x67;The post Cumberland Valley Area Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2010148EN.01002802.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2010 — Peek & Cloppenburg and van Graaf v OHIM — Queen Sirikit Institute of Sericulture (Thai Silk)

(Case T-361/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the figurative Community trade mark Thai Silk - Earlier national figurative trade mark representing a winged creature - Admissibility of the action - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 148/50

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Peek & Cloppenburg (Hamburg, Germany); and van Graaf GmbH & Co. KG (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, A. Renck, T. Dolde and J. Pause, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: The Queen Sirikit Institute of Sericulture, Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Thailand (Bangkok, Thailand), replaced by the Office of the Permanent Secretary, The Prime Minister’s Office, Thailand (represented by: A. Kockläuner, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 June 2008 (Case R 1677/2007-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Peek & Cloppenburg and the Office of the Permanent Secretary, The Prime Minister’s Office, Thailand.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Peek & Cloppenburg and van Graaf GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Peek & Cloppenburg and van Graaf GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 22.11.2008.

1

---
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4689 

AN ACT 

To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau 

of Reclamation within the Northport Irrigation District 

in the State of Nebraska. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4689 EH

1 SECTION 1. EARLY REPAYMENT OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 213 of 

3 the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390mm), 

4 any landowner within the Northport Irrigation District in 

5 the State of Nebraska (referred to in this section as the 

6 ‘‘District’’) may repay, at any time, the construction costs 

7 of project facilities allocated to the landowner’s land with8 in the District. 

9 (b) APPLICABILITY OF FULL-COST PRICING LIMITA10 TIONS.—On discharge, in full, of the obligation for repay11 ment of all construction costs described in subsection (a) 

12 that are allocated to all land the landowner owns in the 

13 District in question, the parcels of land shall not be sub14 ject to the ownership and full-cost pricing limitations 

15 under Federal reclamation law (the Act of June 17, 1902, 

16 32 Stat. 388, chapter 1093), and Acts supplemental to 

17 and amendatory of that Act (43 U.S.C. 371 et seq.), in18 cluding the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (13 U.S.C. 

19 390aa et seq.). 

20 (c) CERTIFICATION.—On request of a landowner that 

21 has repaid, in full, the construction costs described in sub22 section (a), the Secretary of the Interior shall provide to 

23 the landowner a certificate described in section 213(b)(1) 

24 of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 

25 390mm(b)(1)). 

26 (d) EFFECT.—Nothing in this section— 
3 

•HR 4689 EH

1 (1) modifies any contractual rights under, or 

2 amends or reopens, the reclamation contract between 

3 the District and the United States; or 

4 (2) modifies any rights, obligations, or relation5 ships between the District and landowners in the 

6 District under Nebraska State law. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 12, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4689 

AN ACT 

To authorize early repayment of obligations to the 

rigation District in the State of Nebraska. Bureau of Reclamation within the Northport Ir-
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-24-00350-CV

DANIEL WADE, Appellant

V.

CATHRYN ELIZABETH CROOK,

Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 322nd District 

Court

of Tarrant County (322-742655-23)

August 15, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Patricio Contesse, Chief Executive Officer
of Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (“SQM”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Republic
of Chile, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:



1. The Annual Report of SQM on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



1. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F/A
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SQM.

|/s/ Patricio Contesse G.        | 
|------------------------------- | 
|Name:  Patricio Contesse G.     | 
|Title:  Chief Executive Officer | 
|Date: April 29, 2014            |
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74 -73

37 38 39 40 41



### ★
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 09/05 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 05 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
 
 **RULE
13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, **Shannon
L. Greene** , certify
that:
  1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Leather Factory,
Inc.;
  2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
  4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) *[language
intentionally omitted SEC Rel. 33-8238]* for the
registrant and have:
  (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b) *[Left
blank intentionally SEC Rel. No. 33-8238]* ;
  (c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
  (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.
  
 Date:  March 30,
2005
 /s/
      Shannon L. GreeneShannon
      L. GreeneChief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer(principal
      financial and accounting officer)
Director Compensation Policy



 Exhibit 10.36 
  
 COMPENSATION POLICY FOR DIRECTORS OF ORCHID BIOSCIENCES, INC. 
  
 EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2004 
  
 Compensation Policy 
  

				
	 Board of Directors:
	  	 	 
		
	 Annual retainer-chairman
	  	$	15,000
	 Annual retainer-director
	  	$	12,500
	 Meeting attendance fee
	  	$	3,000
	 Telephonic meetings will be paid at the prorated level of $500 per hour.
	  	 	 
		
	 Audit Committee:
	  	 	 
		
	 Annual retainer-chairperson
	  	$	5,000
	 Annual retainer-committee members
	  	$	1,500
	 Meeting attendance fee:
	  	$	1,000
	 Meeting attendance fee (in person for meetings held on days separate from full Board meeting)
	  	$	3,000
	 Telephonic meetings will be paid at the prorated level of $500 per hour.
	  	 	 
		
	 Compensation Committee
	  	 	 
		
	 No annual retainer to be paid to compensation committee chairperson or members.
	  	 	 
	 Meeting attendance fee
	  	$	1,000
	 Meeting attendance fee (in person meetings held on days separate from full Board meeting)
	  	$	3,000
	 Telephonic meetings will be paid at the prorated level of $500 per hour.
	  	 	 

  
 Board members and committee members
receive stock option grants both upon joining the Board and on an annual basis in line with recommendations by the Compensation Committee, which grants are non-qualified stock options under our 2000 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Incentive
Plan, which grants typically vest in monthly increments over 4 years.
H. R. 4722 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 111 Market 

Street in Saugerties, New York, as the ‘‘Maurice D. Hinchey Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MAURICE D. HINCHEY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 111 Market Street in Saugerties, New York, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Maurice D. Hinchey Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Maurice D. Hinchey Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.