alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1424]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

COMMEMORATING THE 75TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE COMPLETION OF THE APPALACHIAN 
                                 TRAIL

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. MICHAEL H. MICHAUD

                                of maine

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Mr. MICHAUD. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to commemorate the 75th 
anniversary of the Appalachian Trail's completion.
  On the 18th of August, 1937, the last mile of the original 
Appalachian Trail (AT) was completed at Sugarloaf Mountain in Maine's 
Carabassett Valley. Although the idea of a super trail on the scale of 
the AT had been discussed for years, it was the vision and 
determination of Benton Mackaye and Myron Avery who truly gave the 
project life. The legacy of the trail was not always secure however, 
with severe weather, the Great Depression, and World War II threatening 
its continuity. Fortunately, the tremendous efforts of trail 
enthusiasts, lead by Mainer Stanley Murray, launched a campaign to save 
the AT and preserve it for future generations.
  Maine's Appalachian Trail Club will be hosting a 75th anniversary 
celebration of the AT's completion 75 years ago. Members of the Club, 
Maine's Appalachian Trail Land Trust, the Trust for Public Land, the 
High Peaks Alliance, the University of Maine, and the Appalachian Trail 
Conservancy will be present. The event will be an opportunity to 
reflect on the beauty of the trail and honor the countless volunteers 
who have helped to sustain this national treasure throughout the years.
  The enormous significance of the Appalachian Trail to the state 
cannot be overstated. Many of our local economies benefit from the 
thousands of hikers that are drawn to Maine every year along its paths. 
I am deeply proud to share in this celebration of Maine and American 
history.
  Mr. Speaker, please join me again in commemorating this momentous 
anniversary.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4599 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4599

  To redesignate Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia as Rock 
                          Creek National Park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2017

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To redesignate Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia as Rock 
                          Creek National Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rock Creek National Park Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF ROCK CREEK PARK AS ROCK CREEK NATIONAL PARK.

    (a) Redesignation.--In recognition of its nationally significant 
natural, cultural, and historical resources, and important recreational 
opportunities, Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia, established 
by the Act of September 27, 1890 (26 Stat. 492), is redesignated as 
``Rock Creek National Park''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Title 40, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in section 8104(b), by striking ``Rock Creek Park'' and 
        inserting ``Rock Creek National Park''; and
            (2) in section 8501(a)(3)(B), by striking ``Rock Creek 
        Park'' and inserting ``Rock Creek National Park''.
    (c) References.--Any reference in any law, map, regulation, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to Rock Creek 
Park in the District of Columbia is deemed to be a reference to Rock 
Creek National Park.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2011013EN.01002302.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2010 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-95/08) (1)

1

(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from Community financing - Support scheme for production in the sector of products processed from fruit and vegetables - Exceptional support measures in the beef and veal sector - Tobacco premiums scheme)

2011/C 13/43

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Aiello and G. Palmieri, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Jimeno Fernández and D. Nardi, acting as Agents, assisted by F. Ruggeri Laderchi, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2008/68/EC of 20 December 2007 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (OJ 2008 L 18, p. 12), in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by the Italian Republic in the sectors of products processed from fruit and vegetables, beef and veal and raw tobacco

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

1

---
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2015-3224 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2015-CE-026-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
**Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2010 – Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli v OHIM (Shape of a
chocolate rabbit with a red ribbon)**

**(Case T-336/08)**

Community trade mark – Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark – Shape of a chocolate rabbit with a red ribbon – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of any distinctive character – Exception – Acquisition of distinctive character through use – Three-dimensional mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(b) and (3)) (see paras 59, 67-71)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 June 2008 (Case R 1332/2005-4), concerning an application for registration as a Community trade mark of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the shape of a chocolate rabbit with a red ribbon. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG |
| Community trade mark sought: | Three-dimensional mark, representing an Easter bunny made of chocolate, for goods in Class 30 – Application No 3844446 |
| Decision of the examiner: | Registration refused |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG to pay the costs. |
# C_2008064EN.01006802.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/68

---

Action brought on 3 January 2008 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-3/08)

(2008/C 64/112)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Action brought against the defendant's decision refusing the applicant's request to receive an Italian translation of a note addressed to him and drafted in English.

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of the note dated 15 February 2007, prot. RELEX.K7/PL/dgD(2007)502497; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the note dated 15 February 2007, prot. RELEX.K7/PL/dgD(2007)502497;

| — | annulment of the defendant's decision, however formulated, rejecting the request of 27 January 2007 submitted by the applicant to the appointing authority; |
| --- | --- |

—

annulment of the defendant's decision, however formulated, rejecting the request of 27 January 2007 submitted by the applicant to the appointing authority;

| — | annulment, so far as may be necessary, of the decision, however formulated, rejecting the complaint of 26 May 2007 submitted by the applicant to the appointing authority; |
| --- | --- |

—

annulment, so far as may be necessary, of the decision, however formulated, rejecting the complaint of 26 May 2007 submitted by the applicant to the appointing authority;

| — | an order that the defendant should indemnify the applicant for the damage caused by the measures whose annulment is sought in the sum of EUR 1 000 or such greater or lesser sum as the Court of First Instance may think fit; |
| --- | --- |

—

an order that the defendant should indemnify the applicant for the damage caused by the measures whose annulment is sought in the sum of EUR 1 000 or such greater or lesser sum as the Court of First Instance may think fit;

| — | an order that the defendant should pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

an order that the defendant should pay the costs.

---
Castelle and Subsidiaries                                           Exhibit 23.1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




                      Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                             Independent Accountants




We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement of
Castelle and  Subsidiaries  on Form S-8 (File Numbers  333-75247,  333-21845 and
333-06083) of our report dated February 14, 2001,  relating to the  consolidated
financial  statements,  which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the  incorporation by reference of our report dated February 14, 2001
relating to the financial statement  schedules,  which also appears in that Form
10-K.









Pricewaterhouse Coopers
San Jose, California
March 29, 2001
# C_2009153EN.01003801.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/38

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 May 2009 — Aurelia Finance v OHIM (AURELIA)

(Case T-136/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Community word mark AURELIA - Failure to pay renewal fee - Removal of trade mark from register on expiry of registration - Application for restitutio in integrum)

2009/C 153/72

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aurelia Finance SA (Geneva, Switzerland) (represented by M. Elmslie, Solicitor, and N. Saunders, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by D. Botis, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 January 2008 (Case R 1214/2007-1), concerning the application for restitutio in integrum lodged by the applicant.

restitutio in integrum

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Aurelia Finance SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Aurelia Finance SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 128, 24.5.2008.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                     Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee (#13883).                

*Date and Time:*                     February 23, 2024, 12:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m.                

*Place:*                     National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314, (Teleconference).                

                    Attendance information for the meeting will be forthcoming on the AAAC website:                     *https://www.nsf.gov/​mps/​ast/​aaac.jsp*.                

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                

*Contact Person:*                     Dr. Carrie Black, Program Director, Division of Astronomical Sciences, Suite W 9188, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-2426.                

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To provide advice and recommendations to the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of mutual interest and concern to the agencies. To prepare the annual report.                

*Agenda:*                     To hear presentations of current programming by representatives from NSF, NASA, DOE and other agencies relevant to astronomy and astrophysics; to discuss current and potential areas of cooperation between the agencies; to formulate recommendations for continued and new areas of cooperation and mechanisms for achieving them.                

Dated: December 21, 2023.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-28715 Filed 12-27-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
# C_2008107EN.01003303.xml

| 26.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/33

---

Action brought on 18 February 2008 — Baldesberger v OHIM (shape of tweezers)

(Case T-78/08)

(2008/C 107/56)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Fides B. Baldesberger (Lugano, Switzerland) (represented by F. Nielsen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 12 December 2007 (Case R 1405/2007-4); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 12 December 2007 (Case R 1405/2007-4);

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Three-dimensional mark depicting tweezers, for goods in class 8 (application No 5 480 108).

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Registration refused.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), as the mark applied for has the requisite distinctive character.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
#### Jack WOODS, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12781.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Nov. 18, 1959.

See also 327 P.2d 720.

*951Valdhe F. Pittman, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

NIX, Judge.

The plaintiff in error, Jack Woods, was charged by information in the District Court of Jackson County with the crime of grand larceny after former conviction. He was found guilty by a jury who was unable to agree upon the punishment. The trial judge sentenced the defendant to serve five (5) years imprisonment.

Judgment and sentence was pronounced by the court on October 31,1958. No appeal was filed in this court until June 2, 1959, which was more than seven months after judgment and sentence was pronounced.

 Under provisions of Section 1054 of Title 22 O.S.1951 the charge being a felony, the person charged and found guilty was, in order to have the appeal considered by this court, required to perfect his appeal within a period of six months from the date of entry of the judgment. The record having been carefully examined by this court, and it affirmatively disclosing' that the attempted appeal was not perfected within six months from the rendition of the judgment complained of, this court has no jurisdiction to consider th'e appeal.

The statutory , provisions are mandatory; therefore, the purported appeal is dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction .to cause its judgment and sentence to be carried into execution.

POWELL, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
|EXHIBIT
10.13




Summary of Severance
Agreement with Named Executive Officers



Castelle has agreed to pay the Named
Executive Officers (excluding Don Rich who has a separate agreement) a severance payment
ranging from three to six months of their compensation, subject to standard payroll
deductions and withholdings, if the Company terminates the officer's employment without
cause at any time or if the Company terminates the officer's employment as a result of a
change of control. For purposes of the Company's agreement with the officers, "cause"
means misconduct, including: (i) conviction of any felony or a crime involving moral
turpitude; (ii) participation in a fraud or act of dishonesty against the Company; (iii)
willful breach of the Company's policies; (iv) intentional damage to the Company's
property; (v) material breach of the terms of the officer's employment letter or the
officer's Employee Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement; or (vi) conduct by
the officer that, in the good faith and reasonable determination of the Company,
demonstrates gross unfitness to serve. Physical or mental disability will not constitute
cause.


Page 1 of 1
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------