alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1431-E1432]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    HONOR FLIGHT ALASKA RECOGNITION

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. DON YOUNG

                               of alaska

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Mr. YOUNG of Alaska. Mr. Speaker, I rise on behalf of a grateful 
Alaska Congressional Delegation, state, and country, to welcome four 
heroes to our nation's capital. On September 27, 2012, four World War 
II veterans are coming on an Honor Flight from Alaska to visit the 
World War II Memorial here in Washington, D.C.
   The Honor Flight program was started in 2005 to provide national 
transportation to D.C. for veterans who might otherwise never see the 
memorials built in their honor. Initially run entirely by individual 
volunteers, the program has grown into a non-profit network of 
volunteers, organizations, and airlines that work together to extend 
this amazing opportunity to those who most deserve it.
   The four veterans on this Honor Flight are World War II veterans: 
William Joseph Nuggent, Army Air Force; Louis Elmer Fessler, U.S. Army; 
Marc Stella, U.S. Marine Corps; Robert J. Ingram, U.S. Navy.
   Mr. Speaker, these four veterans from Alaska join over 81,000 
veterans, from across the country, who have traveled to our nation's 
capital since 2005 to visit and reflect on memorials built in their 
honor. This Honor Flight was made possible through generous public 
donations and contributions from those who wish to honor these heroes.
   We truly can never repay the debt we owe the soldiers, sailors, 
airmen, and Marines who put themselves in harm's way to protect our 
freedom. The sacrifices made by these heroes--and the families they 
left behind--are truly incredible. These servicemen returned home with 
heavy burdens and scars from war, and still helped our nation rebuild 
and achieve unprecedented prosperity. Their honor, courage, commitment, 
and sacrifice brought freedom to much of the world, and allowed us to 
enjoy the freedoms we cherish today.
   Please join me in thanking these Alaska veterans for their selfless 
dedication, commitment, and service to our great nation. God bless 
America and these brave men.

[[Page E1432]]

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23.01





                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



Partnership Policy Committee
Northern Border Partners, L.P.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (File No. 333-63566, File No. 72323, and File No. 333-101469) and on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-66949 and File No. 72696) of our report dated January 23,
2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Northern Border
Partners, L.P. and Subsidiaries (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2002 and
2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,
cash flows, and changes in partners' equity for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2002 included in the Partnership's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and to the reference to
our firm under the heading "Experts" in the prospectus.

Our report refers to the Partnership's adoption of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangibles.

                                  /s/ KPMG LLP


March 27, 2003
Omaha, Nebraska
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 114 (Monday, July 30, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5329]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 PRAYER

  The Chaplain, the Reverend Patrick J. Conroy, offered the following 
prayer:
  Dear God, we give You thanks for giving us another day.
  We ask Your special blessing upon the Members of this people's House. 
As so many Americans have communicated to them this past weekend, there 
is great concern for our future.
  Give all Members wisdom, patience, discernment, and courage to use 
the information they have, the broader understanding of the national 
concerns, and the responsibility they have been given, to lead this 
Nation into a balanced and secure future. Grant a double portion of a 
great prophet's spirit.
  Bless them, O God, and be with them and with us all this day and 
every day to come. May all that is done be for Your greater honor and 
glory.
  Amen.

                          ____________________
```
# C_2011030EN.01003002.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/30

---

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 16 November 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-383/08) (1)

1

()

2011/C 30/48

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 22.11.2008.

1

---
# C_2008092EN.01004002.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/40

---

Action brought on 6 February 2008 — Cementir Italia v Commission

(Case T-63/08)

(2008/C 92/80)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Cementir Italia Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: T. Salonico, G. Pellegrino, G. Pellegrino, G, Barone, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that the contested decision is unlawful and annul that decision in its entirety inasmuch as it regards as State aid the contested measure, which in fact constitutes a lawful continuation of the measure by which the Italian State granted compensation to Terni SpA (and its assignees) for the expropriation of its electricity plants which occurred in 1962-63; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the contested decision is unlawful and annul that decision in its entirety inasmuch as it regards as State aid the contested measure, which in fact constitutes a lawful continuation of the measure by which the Italian State granted compensation to Terni SpA (and its assignees) for the expropriation of its electricity plants which occurred in 1962-63;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings;

| — | in the alternative, annul the decision insofar as it:






  (a) | states that Italy unlawfully paid State aid to ThyssenKrupp, Cementir and Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche in breach of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the decision insofar as it:

(a)

states that Italy unlawfully paid State aid to ThyssenKrupp, Cementir and Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche in breach of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty;

| (b) | states that there are amounts to be recovered from ThyssenKrupp, Cementir and Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche; and consequently |
| --- | --- |

(b)

states that there are amounts to be recovered from ThyssenKrupp, Cementir and Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche; and consequently

| (c) | orders Italy to recover those amounts plus interest without delay; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

orders Italy to recover those amounts plus interest without delay;

| — | in the further alternative, annul the contested decision insofar as it orders Italy to recover the State aid plus interest without delay, since that recovery infringes the general principle of the protection of legitimate expectations. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the further alternative, annul the contested decision insofar as it orders Italy to recover the State aid plus interest without delay, since that recovery infringes the general principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas and main arguments are the same as those relied on in Case T-62/08 ThyssenKrupp v Commission.

ThyssenKrupp

Commission

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7743

In Re: GEORGE MILLER,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-99-692-5)

Submitted: May 13, 2003 Decided: May 21, 2003

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Miller, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

George Miller petitions for a writ of mandamus alleging that

the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing

the district court to act. After Miller filed the instant mandamus

petition, the district court entered an order denying relief on

Miller’s habeas petition. Accordingly, we deny Miller’s mandamus

petition as moot but grant his motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Castelle (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott C. McDonald, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Scott C. McDonald | Name:

Scott C. McDonald

 
 

Title:

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

Date:

March 27, 2006 |
|--------|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
----

**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tari Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

|                     1.      | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                         |
|                     2.      | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                                                                                         |

Date: February 15, 2008

|        | /s/ Theodore Tsagkaris           |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|        |                             |
|        | -------------------------------- |
|        | Theodore Tsagkaris               |
|        | President, C.E.O. and Director   |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer)    |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000880580
<NAME>                        ENEX 90-91 INCOME & RETIREMENT FUND-SERIES 3, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                         31441
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  72613
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104054
<PP&E>                                         962796
<DEPRECIATION>                                 491350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 575500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8448
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     567052
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   575500
<SALES>                                        63677
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               63677
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  13332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               9910
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   41700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        



</TABLE>
# C_2019423EN.01001801.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin — Germany) — Execution of a European arrest warrant issued against NJ

(Case C-489/19 PPU) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - European arrest warrant - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - Article 1(1) - Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ - Minimum requirements on which validity depends - Article 6(1) - Concept of “issuing judicial authority” - European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State - Status - Whether subordinate to a body of the executive - Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case - Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission)

(2019/C 423/22)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Kammergericht Berlin

Party to the main proceedings

NJ

In the presence of: Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlin

Operative part of the judgment

The concept of a ‘European arrest warrant’ referred to in Article 1(1) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that European arrest warrants issued by the public prosecutor’s offices of a Member State fall within that concept, despite the fact that those public prosecutor’s offices are exposed to the risk of being subject, directly or indirectly, to directions or instructions in a specific case from the executive, such as a Minister for Justice, in the context of the issue of those arrest warrants, provided that those arrest warrants are subject, in order to be transmitted by those public prosecutor’s offices, to endorsement by a court which reviews independently and objectively, having access to the entire criminal file to which any specific directions or instructions from the executive are added, the conditions of issue and the proportionality of those arrest warrants, thus adopting an autonomous decision which gives them their final form.

---

(1)  OJ C 280, 19.8.2019.

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION2



Pursuant to Section 906
of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Rick E. Russo, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, to
which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Annual Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Annual Report.



Date: March 15, 2005



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ RICK E. RUSSO                    
|Rick E. Russo Chief Financial Officer

---

2This Certification accompanies the Annual Report in accordance with § 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Form 10-K), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

Honomblo B. Y. CunUmgbm 

cou?aty Auditor 

&vmro county 

Corslcuzm, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

aplalon of thb dqmrtted br beem roca1v.d. 

on 13 or APtio1e 3g12rr Vernon's Annofiated 

tetutor, reads ln part *II follovllt 

"The aomnlssioners~ aourt la aountlea hrviag 

a populatlon ot tvonty tbouam%d (20,000) lmbBb1tulta 

or more, and 1088 thul w hundmd 8&i Wty thouaand (lgO,OOO) lnbabltrats aaoordiag to the lut 

preceding Wdeml Cssuw, &a bwoby l uthoriaed md 

it shrll be it8 duty to fix the Ml~'le8 Of rll the 

r0ii0ving 3~8~3 o~flc~mb,...." 
Honorable E. Y. Cumlmghun, Pa@ 2 

Seotion 4 of Artlclb 3912e, supra, provldms that: 

"In all oountiea of thlr State oontaining a 

population of 10s~ than one hundred end ninety 

thousand (190,000) inhabitant8 aaaordlng to the 

last preceding Federal %imm wher&n the county 

or preoinct of'fioers am oompensated on a salary 

bassls mder the provlsio~ of this Aat, there 

shall be created a fund to be known as the 'Officers Salary FuRd of the County, Teaa. 

Suoh fuud shall bo kept 8-e and apart from 

all other county fund8, aad ahall be held pnd dlrrbureed for the purpose of paying the ealariee of 

officers and the salaries of deputies, assistante 

and olerka of oftlaera who are drawing a rralary 

fron said pund under the provielons of thi8 Aat, 

and to pay the authorized sxpemes of their offioes. 

Suah fmd shall be deposited in the county depoaitory and shall be proteoted to the sama extent a8 

0th0r 00wr funds." 

Paragraph (c) of Seotloa 6, Article 3912o, supra, 

provldet3 tbatt 

“Sm.(a). Any morals8 mamining in the Of'tideara* Salary Fund or funds o? any county at the 

end of any fiscal year aftm all salaries and 

authorlmd exponaes inourrod against said Puud 

for said ye6r ehall have been paid may be, m order of the o~mmlssloaera~ oourt, transferred to 

the credit of the General Fuml of the oounty." 

mvarro County has a population of more than tveaty 

thoueand (20,000 

ninety thousand 1 

inhabttants aM less thau ow hundred and 

190,000) acoordlng to the laet primeding 

Federal Census and the aounty offlalals OS said oouaty are 

oompensated on M annual salary basis. IQIvarro county has an 

Offlaers' Salary Fund as provided by Section 4, aupra. 

In vimi ol the foregoing statutes, you are reapeatfully adviwsd that It 1s th8 opinion of thin departmemt that 

after all salaries and authorized 6xpenses lnourrsd against 
lionorable E. Y. Cunningham, Pago 3 

the Offlosrs~ Salary Fund Sor e&id year have bean paid, it 

IS legal for tim coaslls*loA6ra ’ oourt to traMf6P any monI6s 

rem8Inlng in said Fund to the General Fund of the Oounty at 

the end of the flscrl y~r. 

Trusting that the foregoing fully anmmra your lnqulry, ve are
# C_2008107EN.01003201.xml

| 26.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/32

---

Action brought on 11 February 2008 — Travel Servis v OHIM — Eurowings Luftverkehrs (smartWings)

(Case T-72/08)

(2008/C 107/53)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Travel Service a.s. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: S. Hejdová)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Eurowings Luftverkehrs AG (Dortmund, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Alter the contested decision of the Second Board of Appeal in Case R 1515/2006-2 as follows:






  — | annul the Opposition Division decision relating to opposition proceedings No B 782 351 of 29 September 2006 in its entirety; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Alter the contested decision of the Second Board of Appeal in Case R 1515/2006-2 as follows:

—

annul the Opposition Division decision relating to opposition proceedings No B 782 351 of 29 September 2006 in its entirety;

| — | order the opponent to bear the costs incurred by the applicant with respect to the opposition and the appeal proceedings before the OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the opponent to bear the costs incurred by the applicant with respect to the opposition and the appeal proceedings before the OHIM.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative Community trade mark ‘smartWings’ for goods and services in classes 16, 21, 37, 39, 41 and 43 — Application No 3 650 595

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Eurowings Luftverkehrs AG

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The national and international word mark ‘EuroWings’ for goods and services in classes 16 and 41, the national and international word mark ‘EUROWINGS’ for goods and services in classes 39 and 42 and the national word mark ‘WINGSGLASS’ for goods and services in classes 16, 39, 41 and 42

Mark or sign cited:

Wings

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in part

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 and of essential procedural requirements enshrined in Articles 73 and 79 CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---