alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.43  [ULTRATECH LETTERHEAD]   [DATE]   Dear [EMPLOYEE]:  As you know, as a senior employee of Ultratech Stepper, Inc. (the
Company), you have been asked to assist the Company in the preparation and
review of its disclosure documents filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, in particular the Companys periodic reports on Form 10-Q and Form
10-K.  In connection with such
preparation and review, the Company has asked you to certify that, among other
things, you have reviewed the report and that within your areas of expertise
and duties at the Company, the report is not misleading and does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact (the Certification, a form of which
has been provided to you).  The Company agrees that it will indemnify you and hold
you harmless to the fullest extent permitted by law if you should become a
party to or a witness or other participant in, or are threatened to be made a
party to or witness or other participant in, any threatened, pending or
completed action, suit, proceeding or alternative dispute resolution mechanism,
or any hearing, inquiry or investigation that you believe might lead to the
institution of any such action, suit, proceeding or alternative dispute
resolution mechanism, whether civil, criminal, administrative, investigative or
other by reason of or arising from any Certification made by you to the
Company, except in the case of fraud or intentional or knowing misstatement,
omission or misconduct by you, including, without limitation, for any and all
losses, claims, damages, expenses (including attorneys fees), fines, penalties
and liabilities incurred in connection with, and any amount paid in settlement
of, any such action, suit, proceeding or alternative dispute resolution
mechanism.  The Company shall advance
all expenses actually incurred by you no later than five (5) days after receipt
of written request therefor. 
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the obligations of the Company hereunder
shall be subject to the condition that the Companys outside legal counsel
shall not have determined that such indemnification is not permitted under
applicable law.  In addition, the
Companys indemnification obligation hereunder shall be subject to the further
condition that any advance payment of any expenses by the Company shall be
subject to the condition that, if, when and to the extent the Companys outside
legal counsel determines that under applicable law you would not be permitted
to be indemnified hereunder, the Company shall be entitled to be reimbursed by
you (and you hereby agree to so reimburse the Company) for all such amounts
theretofore paid.  This indemnification
shall not apply to any action, suit, proceeding or alternative dispute
resolution mechanism between you and the Company.  Please indicate your acceptance of the terms and conditions contained
herein by signing below.  Sincerely,
  
  ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:Bruce Wright, Chief Financial Officer
# C_2009032EN.01002203.xml

| 7.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/22

---

Action brought on 9 December 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-546/08)

(2009/C 32/39)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Dejmek and M. Sundén, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 (1) on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing or, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 (1) on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing or, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for implementation of the Directive expired on 15 December 2007.

---

(1)  OJ L 309, p. 15.

1

---
# C_2012319EN.01000902.xml

| 20.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/9

---

Order of the General Court of 4 September 2012 — DAI v Commission

(Case T-381/08) (1)

1

(Agriculture - Sugar - Temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry of the Community - Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 and Regulation (EC) No 928/2006 - Decision 2008/445/EC - Retroactive restructuring aid)

2012/C 319/16

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: DAI — Sociedade de Desenvolvimento Agro-Industrial, SA (Coruche, Portugal) (represented: initially by J. da Cruz Vilaça, L. Romão and A. Mestre, and subsequently by R. Oliveira, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Alfonso and P. Rossi, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against Commission Decision 2008/445/EC of 11 June 2008 fixing the amounts per Member State of retroactive restructuring aid for growers and undertakings having restructured in the 2006/07 and 2007/08 marketing years in the framework of the temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry of the Community (OJ 2008 L 156, p. 20).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | DAI — Sociedade de Desenvolvimento Agro-Industrial, SA shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

DAI — Sociedade de Desenvolvimento Agro-Industrial, SA shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 6.12.2008.

1

---
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<LEGEND> THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CORPORATIONS FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 30, 1999, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

      <MULTIPLIER> 1

      <S>                           <C>
      <PERIOD-TYPE>                     QUARTER
      <FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JAN 31-1999
      <PERIOD-END>                  APR-30-1999
      <CASH>                            515,116
      <SECURITIES>                            0
      <RECEIVABLES>                   1,892,690
      <ALLOWANCES>                            0
      <INVENTORY>                             0
      <CURRENT ASSETS>                2,407,806
      <PP&E>                             18,772
      <DEPRECIATION>                     (3,123)
      <TOTAL ASSETS>                  6,180,060
      <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             557,911
      <BONDS>                                 0
      <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
      <PREFERRED>                             0
      <COMMON>                        8,472,669
      <OTHER-SE>                              0
      <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    6,180,060
      <SALES>                                 0
      <TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0
      <CGS>                                   0
      <TOTAL COSTS>                     514,980
      <OTHER EXPENSES>                        0
      <LOSS PROVISION>                        0
      <INTEREST EXPENSE>                (11,250)
      <INCOME PRETAX>                  (523,533)
      <INCOME-TAX>                        3,100
      <INCOME CONTINUING>              (526,633)
      <DISCONTINUED>                          0
      <EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
      <CHANGES>                               0
      <NET-INCOME>                     (526,633)
      <EPS-BASIC>                        (.00)
      <EPS-DILUTED>                        (.00)
# C_2009205EN.01003502.xml

| 29.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/35

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 July 2009 — Mineralbrunnen Rhön-Sprudel Egon Schindel v OHIM — Schwarzbräu (ALASKA)

(Case T-225/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark ALASKA - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2009/C 205/64

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mineralbrunnen Rhön-Sprudel Egon Schindel GmbH (Ebersburg, Germany) (represented by: P. Wadenbach, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Schwarzbräu GmbH (Zusmarshausen, Germany) (represented by: L. Schlarmann, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 April 2008 (Case R 877/2004-4) concerning invalidity proceedings between Mineralbrunnen Rhön-Sprudel Egon Schindel GmbH and Schwarzbräu GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mineralbrunnen Rhön-Sprudel Egon Schindel GmbH to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mineralbrunnen Rhön-Sprudel Egon Schindel GmbH to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM);

| 3. | Orders Schwarzbräu GmbH to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Schwarzbräu GmbH to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 30.8.2008.

1

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                        IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
                   CALCULATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

                (Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                 Year ended December 31,
                                                 -----------------------
PRIMARY                                          1996             1995
-------                                          ----             ----
                                               (audited)        (audited)

Net income                                   $    92,565      $    74,285

Weighted Average Common
    Shares Outstanding                        25,000,000       25,000,000      *

Dilutive Effect of Share Options               1,080,744          618,719      *

                                             -----------      -----------
    Total                                     26,080,744       25,618,719      *
                                             -----------      -----------

Net income per Common Share                        $3.55            $2.90      *

FULLY DILUTED                                    Year ended December 31,
-------------                                    -----------------------
                                                 1996             1995
                                                 ----             ----
                                               (audited)        (audited)

Net Income                                   $    92,565      $    74,285

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding    25,000,000       25,000,000      *

Dilutive Effect of Share Options               1,211,689          618,719      *

                                             ----------------------------
Total                                         26,211,689       25,618,719      *
                                             ----------------------------

Net Income per Common Share                  $      3.53      $      2.90      *


* Pro Forma (See Note 4 to the Company's consolidated financial statements)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4403 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4403

  To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personally identifiable 
                  information, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 15, 2017

  Mr. Denham (for himself and Mr. Pascrell) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personally identifiable 
                  information, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Moving Americans Privacy Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION.

    Paragraph (2) of section 431(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1431(c)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(2)(A) The information listed in paragraph (1) shall not be 
available for public disclosure if--
            ``(i) the Secretary of the Treasury makes an affirmative 
        finding on a shipment-by-shipment basis that disclosure is 
        likely to pose a threat of personal injury or property damage; 
        or
            ``(ii) the information is exempt under the provisions of 
        section 552(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code.
    ``(B) The Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall 
ensure that any personally identifiable information, including social 
security numbers, passport numbers, and residential addresses, are 
removed from any manifest signed, produced, delivered, or transmitted 
under this section before the manifest is disclosed to the public.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                                1,236
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    136,856
<PP&E>                              417,539
<DEPRECIATION>                      219,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    3,059,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             4,791,233
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                         16,391,521
<OTHER-SE>                        1,476,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      3,059,133
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  671,532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (1,543,318)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,543,318)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (1,543,318)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.60)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.6 (b)

                                AMENDMENT TO
                SUBSIDIARY DATA PROCESSING SERVICES AGREEMENT


              This Amendment to Subsidiary  Data Processing  Services  Agreement
     (the  AAmendment@)  is made as of the  29th  day of  August,  1997,  by and
     between  AMERICO LIFE,  INC., a Missouri  corporation,  GREAT SOUTHERN LIFE
     INSURANCE COMPANY, a Texas corporation (AGreat Southern@),  UNITED FIDELITY
     LIFE INSURANCE  COMPANY,  a Texas  corporation,  THE COLLEGE LIFE INSURANCE
     COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Texas corporation,  LOYALTY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a
     Texas  corporation  (ALoyalty@),  and NATIONAL FARMERS UNION LIFE INSURANCE
     COMPANY, a Texas corporation.

              WHEREAS,  the parties  entered into that certain  Subsidiary  Data
     Processing   Services   Agreement   dated  as  of   January  1,  1993  (the
     AAgreement@); and

              WHEREAS,  on August 29, 1997,  Great Southern  intends to sell all
     the outstanding stock of Loyalty to Healthcare COMPARE Corp.; and

              WHEREAS,  to  facilitate  such sale of stock,  the parties wish to
     amend the  Agreement  to remove  Loyalty  from the  Agreement in the manner
     provided herein;

              NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration of the premises and other good
     and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
     acknowledged,  the parties hereto agree that,  effective as of the close of
     business on August 29, 1997, the Agreement shall cease to apply to Loyalty,
     and  Loyalty  shall  thereafter  have no  rights or  obligations  under the
     Agreement.

              IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,   the  parties  hereto  have  executed  this
     Amendment as of the date first above written.


     AMERICO LIFE, INC.                      GREAT SOUTHERN LIFE INSURANCE
                                             COMPANY

     By                                      By
         Name                                Name
         Title                               Title

<PAGE>

     UNITED FIDELITY LIFE                    THE COLLEGE LIFE INSURANCE
     INSURANCE COMPANY                       COMPANY OF AMERICA

     By                                      By
         Name                                Name
         Title                               Title


     NATIONAL FARMERS UNION                  LOYALTY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
     LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

     By                                      By
         Name                                Name
         Title                               Title
#### Andrew Jackson TAYLOR, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12094.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Jan. 12, 1955.

Carder & Carder, Hobart, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

BRETT, Judge.

The plaintiff in error Andrew Jackson Taylor, defendant below, was charged by information in the county court of Kiowa county with the offense of driving a motor vehicle on a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. He was tried by a jury and sentenced to pay a fine of $25; judgment and sentence was entered accordingly, from which this appeal has been perfected.

The evidence in this case bears out the allegations of the information to the effect that the defendant was operating a motor vehicle on Highway No. 183 while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The testimony of Jack Rollins, Highway Patrolman, was to the effect that the defendant was observed on said highway about 2 miles east of Hobart. It was observed that he forced a truck off of its side of the road onto the shoulder. The evidence further discloses that the defendant was stopped, ordered out of his automobile, his tongue was thick and he staggered when he attempted to walk. He admitted to the officer that he had been drinking. Highway Patrolman Forrest Mussen corroborated the testimony of Officer Rollins and added that defendant’s conversation did not make sense and that when they got to the jail with him, he had to take him by the arm and help him up the steps, to keep him from falling back. Mr. Dailey, jailor and deputy sheriff of Kiowa county, testified that his speech was broken and that the defend*380ant had the odor of alcohol upon him when he was brought to the jail. Lewis Brewer, a civilian who resided at Cement, testified that he was coming to Hobart and that he observed the defendant driving, ahead of him, all over the road, that he followed him on down the highway until he met the highway patrol. He did not testify that he was under the influence of intoxicating liquor but he did testify that something was wrong with him because his speech was blurred and because of the manner in which he drove. He said at one time he drove off in the ditch and another time he was completely off the slab. The evidence of the defendant’s guilt is clear and convincing. We have examined the pleadings, instructions and judgment and no material error is apparent. The state of the record being such as it is, the conviction is therefore accordingly affirmed.

POWELL, P. J., and JONES, J., concur.
----

**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tari Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 14, 2008

/s/ Theodore Tsagkaris

--------------------------------

Theodore Tsagkaris

President, C.E.O. and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

----