alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TOOTIE DISCOUNT PALACE, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

PTX PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC., HUY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

a Florida corporation, and GLOBAL BRAND CLOSEOUT, LLC, a Florida 

Limited Liability Company,

Appellees.

No. 4D15-1620

[April 6, 2016]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Jack Tuter, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-19925(14).

John Elias of Law Offices of John Elias, Pembroke Pines, for appellant.

David M. Levine and Ernesto M. Rubi of Carey Rodriguez Milian Gonya, 

LLP, Miami, for appellee PTX Performance Products, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellant’s 

motion to intervene post-judgment. Such motions are not appropriate 

when there is an alternative procedure that is available to protect the 

interest of the moving party. De Sousa v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A., 170 So. 

3d 928, 931 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). Here, Appellant had available to it 

section 56.16, Florida Statutes (2015), which provides that “any person 

other than the defendant in execution [who] claims any property levied on

. . . may obtain possession of the property” by following certain 

procedures.1 Because Appellant had this alternate procedure available to 

it, Appellant’s motion to intervene was inappropriate and properly denied.

We dismiss Appellant’s issue regarding attorneys’ fees as not yet ripe; 

the trial court merely reserved jurisdiction to assess future attorneys’ fees 

1 We note that the 2016 amendment to this statute, not yet in effect, appears to 

simply clarify pronouns in the statute and does not substantively alter its 

availability under the facts of this case.
2

and did not actually make a grant of fees. See Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So. 

2d 130, 131-32 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). No motion for fees was made in this 

Court, so no appellate attorneys’ fees should be awarded.

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

STEVENSON, GROSS and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2008064EN.01006201.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/62

---

Action brought on 16 January 2008 — Weldebräu v OHIM — Kofola Holding (Shape of a bottle)

(Case T-24/08)

(2008/C 64/100)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Weldebräu GmbH & Co. KG (Plankstadt, Germany) (represented by W. Göpfert, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kofola Holding a.s. (Ostrava, Czech Republic)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 15 November 2007 in Case R 1096/2006-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 15 November 2007 in Case R 1096/2006-4;

| — | the defendant to be ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

the defendant to be ordered to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Kofola Holding a.s.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the three-dimensional mark ‘shape of a bottle’ for goods in Classes 30, 32 and 33 (Application No 3 367 539)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the three-dimensional mark ‘shape of a bottle’ for goods in Classes 21, 32 and 33 (Community trade mark No 690 016)

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), as there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks in opposition.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T W A L T E R M . S H A W , M .D ., P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. C O U N T Y O F S A N D I E G O ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 56102 D. C . No . 3 : 0 6 - c v - 0 2 6 8 0 - MM AP OR ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M i c ha e l M . A ne l l o, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r16, 2010 ** B e f o r e : T A S H I M A , B E R Z O N , a n d C L I F T O N , C ir c u it J u d g e s . W al t erM . S haw , M . D . , appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ctcourt ’ s s um m ary j ud gm enti n h i s 42 U . S . C . § 1 98 3 act i on al l egi ng thatdefe nd ant s’ approv al of a f r audul e nts ubdi vi s i on m ap vi ol a t e d hi s c ons t i tut i ona l r i ght s . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED NO V 22 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 56102 2 u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o , O l s e n v . I daho State B d. of

Me d. , 3 6 3 F. 3 d 9 1 6 , 9 2 2 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 4 ) , a n d w e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l y gr a nt e d s um m a ryj udgm e nton S ha w ’ s due proces s c l ai m because i ti s barre d b y the appl i cabl e s t atut e of l i m i t at i on s, and S haw fa i l ed t o rai se a tri abl e i ss ue as t o w hether he i s e nt i t l ed t o equ i t abl e t ol l i ng base d o n h is p r io rs ta te c o u rt a c tio n . See Ca n a te l la v . V a n De Ka mp , 486 F . 3d 1128, 1132- 33 ( 9th C i r . 2007) ( § 1983 c l a i m s tha tw e r e m or e tha n one y e a rol d a s of Janu ary 1, 20 03 barr ed un der C al i forni a’ s pre vi ou s one-y ear s t atut e of l i m i t at i on s) ; D av i ton v . C olum bi a/

H C A H e al thc ar e C or

p. , 241 F . 3d 1131, 1141 ( 9th C i r . 2001) ( e n ba nc ) ( e qui t abl e t ol l i ng dur i ng apl a i nt i f f’ s pr i orpur s ui tof

ar e m e dyi n a d i fferen tfo ru m d o es n o tap p l y t o “ a cl ai m fo r a d i st i n ctw ro n g th atw as not the b a s is o f th e e a r lie rp r o c e e d in g ” ) . W e do notc ons i de rS ha w ’ s c ont e nt i ons r a i s e d f orthe f i r s tt i m e on appe a l or n o t s u p p o rte d b y a r g u m e n t. See T rave ler s P rop. Cas. C o. of

A m . v. C onoc oP hi l l i

ps C o. , 54 6 F . 3d 11 42 , 11 46 (9th C i r. 20 08 ); Hi lao v . Es tate of M ar c os , 1 0 3 F .3 d 7 6 7 , 7 7 8 n .4 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 6 ) . S haw ’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

 

(1) Form S-8 No. 333-125698 dated June 10, 2005 pertaining to the 2005 Stock Option Plan of Cheetah Oil & Gas Ltd., and

(2) Form S-8 No. 333-113084 dated February 25, 2004 pertaining to the 2004 Equity Performance Plan of Cheetah Oil & Gas Ltd.,

 

of our report dated March 18, 2005, with respect to the consolidated statements of Cheetah Oil & Gas Ltd, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

 
| Vancouver, Canada April 13, 2007 | /s/ Moore Stephens Ellis Foster Ltd. Chartered Accountants |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             |                                                       |
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4407 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 596
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4407

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2018

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                           September 28, 2018

 Reported by Mr. Johnson, with amendments and an amendment to the title
  [Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3s101 Rockwell Street in Warrenville, Illinois, as the ``Corporal 
             Jeffery Allen Williams Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORPORAL JEFFERY JEFFREY ALLEN WILLIAMS POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3s101 Rockwell Street in Warrenville, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Corporal Jeffery Jeffrey Allen Williams 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Jeffery Jeffrey Allen Williams Post Office Building''.
            Amend the title so as to read: ``An Act to designate the 
        facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3s101 
        Rockwell Street in Warrenville, Illinois, as the `Corporal 
        Jeffrey Allen Williams Post Office Building'.''.
                                                       Calendar No. 596

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4407

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3s101 Rockwell Street in Warrenville, Illinois, as the ``Corporal 
             Jeffery Allen Williams Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 28, 2018

         Reported with amendments and an amendment to the title
```
# C_2009044EN.01007802.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/78 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/78

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 27 November 2008 — Miguelez Herreras v Commission

(Case F-22/08) (1)

1

(2009/C 44/142)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 116, 9.5.2008, p. 33.

1

---
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ,

Petitioner

v.

GREENE COUNTY COURT AND,

PROTHONOTARY, MRS. SUSAN WHITE,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 198 EM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of January , 201 7

, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED , and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED

.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 241 (Monday, December 18, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 87458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27766]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules; Hearing of the Judicial 
Conference

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules; Notice of cancellation 
of open hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the 
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure has been canceled: Bankruptcy 
Rules Hearing on January 12, 2024. The announcement for this hearing 
was previously published in the Federal Register on August 9, 2023.

DATES: January 12, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: H. Thomas Byron III, Esq., Chief 
Counsel, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. 
Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus 
Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-1820, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6a381f060f1929050707031e1e0f0f35390f09180f1e0b18132a0b05441f1909051f181e19440d051c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6634130a031525090b0b0f121203033935030514031207141f26070948131505091314121548010910">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

    Dated: December 13, 2023.
Shelly L. Cox,
Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2023-27766 Filed 12-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2010063EN.01004701.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2010 — REWE Zentral v OHIM — Grupo Corporativo Teype (Solfrutta)

(Case T-331/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Solfrutta - Earlier Community word mark FRUTISOL - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Partial refusal of registration - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 63/82

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: REWE Zentral AG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey and A. Bognár, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Grupo Corporativo Teype, SL (Madrid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 May 2008 (Case R 1679/2007-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Grupo Corporativo Teype, SL and REWE-Zentral AG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 May 2008 (Case R 1679/2007-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 May 2008 (Case R 1679/2007-2);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260 of 11.10.2008.

1

---
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Comments on the Interagency Science Consultation Draft IRIS Assessment of RDX (dated September 2014)

Date: October 31 , 2014

_

____________________________________________________________________________________



### NASA Comments, IRIS draft RDX
October 28, 2014

NASA thanks EPA for the opportunity to review and comment on the latest IRIS draft on RDX. We defer to the technical and scientific input provided by the Department of Defense (DoD), due to their unique and extensive experience this chemical. NASA encourages EPA to work closely with DoD, offering an opportunity for collaboration, scientific discussion and collegiality among federal agencies to develop sound environmental approach for this chemical.

NASA also commends EPA for initiating a NAS recommendation with the provision of the first use of a Pre

- Amble in this assessment. We request that EPA develop a clear definition of the nature and scope of the Pre

- Amble to ensure this new addition to IRIS documents conforms with the recommendations of the NAS.
# C_2009055EN.01001401.xml

| 7.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/14

---

Action brought on 22 December 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-572/08)

(2009/C 55/22)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Aresu and W. Mölls, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Forms of order sought

| — | A declaration that the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 90 EC, by conferring a tax concession on regenerated lubricating oil produced from used oil collected in Italy, but refusing to confer the same concession on regenerated lubricating oil produced from used oil collected in other Member States (in accordance with Circular 24/D of 5 May 2004 of the Italian Revenue Authority and Article 1(116) of Law No 266 of 23 December 2005, as interpreted by Article 62 of the Testo unico delle disposizioni legislative concernenti le imposte sulla produzione e sui consumi e relative sanzioni penali e amministrative (Consolidated Text of Legislative Provisions relating to duties on production and consumption and related criminal and administrative penalties) approved by Decree No 504 of the President of the Republic of 26 October 1995); |
| --- | --- |

—

A declaration that the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 90 EC, by conferring a tax concession on regenerated lubricating oil produced from used oil collected in Italy, but refusing to confer the same concession on regenerated lubricating oil produced from used oil collected in other Member States (in accordance with Circular 24/D of 5 May 2004 of the Italian Revenue Authority and Article 1(116) of Law No 266 of 23 December 2005, as interpreted by Article 62 of the Testo unico delle disposizioni legislative concernenti le imposte sulla produzione e sui consumi e relative sanzioni penali e amministrative (Consolidated Text of Legislative Provisions relating to duties on production and consumption and related criminal and administrative penalties) approved by Decree No 504 of the President of the Republic of 26 October 1995);

Testo unico delle disposizioni legislative concernenti le imposte sulla produzione e sui consumi e relative sanzioni penali e amministrative

| — | An order that the Italian Republic is to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

An order that the Italian Republic is to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission complains that the Italian authorities are operating a system of tax concessions on regenerated lubricating oil which favours national production to the detriment of that from other Member States, in clear breach of the principle of non-discrimination, which in the field of taxation is laid down in Article 90 EC.

That system reproduces a previous regime of tax concessions already condemned by the Court of Justice in 1980, and the Italian Republic's arguments in favour of the new system cannot justify such a choice.

---
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                                COHO ENERGY, INC.
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


CURRENT SUBSIDIARIES

Coho Resources, Inc., Nevada (100% subsidiary of Coho Energy, Inc.)
Coho Oil & Gas, Inc., Delaware (100% subsidiary of Coho Resources, Inc.)
Coho Resources Limited, Alberta, Canada (100% subsidiary of Coho Energy, Inc.)
Coho International Limited, Bahamas (100% subsidiary of Coho Resources Limited)
Coho Anaguid, Inc., Delaware (100% subsidiary of Coho Resources, Inc.)

SUBSIDIARIES MERGED OR DISSOLVED

Coho Marketing & Transportation, Inc., Nevada (100% subsidiary of Coho
Resources, Inc.)*
Interstate Natural Gas Company, Delaware (100% subsidiary of Coho Resources,
Inc.)*
Coho Exploration, Inc., Delaware (100% subsidiary of Interstate Natural
Gas Company)*
Coho Louisiana Production Company, Delaware (100% subsidiary of Interstate
Natural Gas Company)*
Profile Petroleum Ltd., Alberta, Canada (100% subsidiary of Coho Resources
Limited) **
Grayon Development Limited, Alberta, Canada (100% subsidiary of Coho Resources
Limited) **
Coho Shell Company, Delaware (100% subsidiary of Coho Energy, Inc.)***

*    These subsidiaries were merged into Coho Resources, Inc. effective
     December 31, 2000.
**   These subsidiaries were dissolved effective August, 2001.
***  This subsidiary was merged into Coho Energy, Inc. effective
     January 31, 2001.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5710]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. HARPER:
       H.R. 6326.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Clause 18 of section 8 of article 1 of the Constitution.
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of SIN Holdings, Inc. (the
Company), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, (the
Report), I, Steve S. Sinohui, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, based on my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|1) |  | the
Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act  of 1934; and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2) |  | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
Companys financial position and results of operations.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Steve S. Sinohui
Steve S. Sinohui, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 12, 2005

---
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA - 2013 - 0461 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM169AD

747 - 53A2682 --- 5/8/08

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008