alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4301 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4301

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 201 Tom Hall Street in Fort Mill, South Carolina, as the ``J. 
                Elliott Williams Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 2017

 Mr. Norman (for himself, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Duncan of 
 South Carolina, Mr. Sanford, Mr. Rice of South Carolina, Mr. Clyburn, 
and Mr. Gowdy) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 201 Tom Hall Street in Fort Mill, South Carolina, as the ``J. 
                Elliott Williams Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. J. ELLIOTT WILLIAMS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 201 Tom Hall Street in Fort Mill, South Carolina, shall be 
known and designated as the ``J. Elliott Williams Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``J. Elliott 
Williams Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018134EN.01002901.xml

| 16.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/29

---

Action brought on 19 February 2018 — Gruppo Armonie v EUIPO (ARMONIE)

(Case T-88/18)

(2018/C 134/41)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gruppo Armonie SpA (Casalgrande, Italy) (represented by: G. Medri, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘ARMONIE’ — Application for registration No 16 430 068

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 December 2017 in Case R 2063/2017-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 2017/1001.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4451 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4451

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a five-year 
   extension to the homeless veterans reintegration programs and to 
  provide clarification regarding eligibility for services under such 
                               programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2017

 Mr. Wenstrup (for himself and Ms. Brownley of California) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a five-year 
   extension to the homeless veterans reintegration programs and to 
  provide clarification regarding eligibility for services under such 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeless Veterans' Reintegration 
Programs Reauthorization Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS HOMELESS 
              VETERANS REINTEGRATION PROGRAMS.

    (a) Five-Year Extension of Homeless Veterans Reintegration 
Programs.--Section 2021(e)(F) of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ``2017'' and inserting ``2022''.
    (b) Five-Year Extension of Homeless Women Veterans and Homeless 
Veterans With Children Reintegration Grant Program.--Section 
2021A(f)(1) of such title is amended by striking ``2017'' and inserting 
``2022''.
    (c) Clarification of Eligibility for Services Under Homeless 
Veterans Reintegration Programs.--Section 2021(a) of such title is 
amended by striking ``reintegration of homeless veterans into the labor 
force.'' and inserting the following: ``reintegration into the labor 
force of--
            ``(1) homeless veterans;
            ``(2) veterans participating in the Department of Veterans 
        Affairs supported housing program for which rental assistance 
        is provided pursuant to section 8(o)(19) of the United States 
        Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(19));
            ``(3) Indians who are veterans and receiving assistance 
        under the Native American Housing Assistance and Self 
        Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4101 et seq.);
            ``(4) veterans who are transitioning from being 
        incarcerated; and
            ``(5) veterans participating in the Department of Veterans 
        Affairs rapid rehousing and prevention program authorized in 
        section 2044 of this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                           5,483
<SECURITIES>                                    13,593
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,862
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,615
<INVENTORY>                                        349
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,509
<PP&E>                                          16,610
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,383
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,410
<BONDS>                                            254
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,644
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,564
<SALES>                                         31,390
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,064
<CGS>                                            3,290
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,595
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,207
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 738
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,682
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,866
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                816
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       816
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1435-E1436]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       HONORING MR. JASON ROBERTS

                                 ______
                                 

                       HON. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to 
honor Mr. Jason Roberts, a White House ``Champion of Change'' from Oak 
Cliff, Texas. This week, the White House honored Mr. Roberts and other 
leaders from across the U.S. for their ground-breaking initiatives to 
enhance their communities.
  Mr. Roberts' leadership has been exemplary in his initiatives to 
improve local areas, and revitalize communities in South Dallas. As 
founder of the Oak Cliff Transit Authority, a nonprofit organization 
dedicated to reclaiming Oak Cliff's past distinction, Mr. Roberts 
worked to revive and modernize the Dallas streetcar system. Through 
hard work and ingenuity, Mr. Roberts led the city's effort to obtain a 
$23 million TIGER grant from the Federal Transit Administration for 
their revitalization efforts.
  Mr. Roberts' ``Better Blocks'' project reclaims blighted areas, 
converting vacant properties into temporary walk-friendly districts, 
complete with pop-up businesses, bike lanes, cafe seating, and 
landscaping. Mr. Roberts' efforts have been so successful in South 
Dallas that over 20 U.S. cities have taken steps to enhance 
neighborhoods in the same fashion based on his work. Mr. Roberts' 
``Better Blocks'' project has even gained international recognition, 
and has since been featured in the New York Times, TED Talks, and on 
NPR.
  Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to honor the hard work and vision that Mr. 
Jason Roberts continues to bring to South Dallas. His hard work and 
vision have allowed him to not only envision a better Dallas, but to 
also act on that vision. I look forward to seeing what future advances 
that Mr. Roberts will spearhead next, and I stand ready to support 
these efforts at every turn.

[[Page E1436]]

                          ____________________
```
2013-12-20 11:54 FAA 8172225092 » 2024935142 p 1 

To: Heating Dncket C!etl<, AGC-430 

Company: Fedarro~l Aviation Adm1nlstraUon 

'T~J!.aphane: 

Fax: 202.493.5"142 

From: Annjanet Channa.ul!, 

THla: Agency Attomey 

Withdrawal of Complain! 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Southwll!llt Raglan 

Offlee of R~glona.l Counsel 

Fort Worth, Taxas. 16137 

f!!cRH«!.IlfCOOt!!!K Alkl!:Jl'1!! 

2601 Ml;>aCIJ!ltU &ulavmro 

f-artWorth, Tll:xas 761::17 

T \817,222,50!19} 

F (8i7.222.!lll45150ll2} 

In the Matte.r of: Mesa Airllnes, Inc.~ FAA Dock.et Nos. 2013-0721,2013-0722, 

2013-0846, and 2013-0047. 

P!U!!e Nom: "Thls massage is intended only for the use of the indMdual o.r entity k1 

which it is addressed and may contein information !hal is priviTegEld, (1onffdential, .and 

exempt from dff!ch>·Sure under applicable law." 
2013-12-20 11:57 

In !he Matter ot 

FAA 8172225092 » 2024935142 p 6/9 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

FAA Docket No. 2013·Qf!46 

FMGasuNo. 20118W(l7003U 

ALJ- Not Ye!.Assfgned 

WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLA!NI 

Tha fedmal Avlatton Administratioo (FAA}, In accordance with Sectlon13.215 of the 

Rules of Practice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions., hereby w!!hdra\vs !ts rA:tmplali1t. This 

oompla!nt Is v.i!hdr.mvn becauso ths !Jflrtlts have reached a settlement of the casa and a 

hearing is no longer raqulretL Dated thls 20lhday of December 2U13. 

Respectfully submitted, 

ERIC E ANDERSON 

Regional Counsel 

·· Attomey 

~ {817) 222<1071 
2013-12-20 11:58 FAA 8172225092 » 2024935142 p 7/9 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

l hereby cartlfy that the original and one copy of the forauolng Withdrawal nf Complaint has 

bt**1 mailed December 20, 2013, by CerUfioo tvlalf -Return RMl;,~pt Reques!ed and fax to: 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Mrnln1Biration 

BOO Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 

l hereby certify U1at a r.opy of the foregoing Wlt!n:!rawal of Complaint has be'en mailed 

December 20, 2013, by Certified Malf-Retum Reoofpt Requested, It' the following: 

Brian Gillman, Vice-President and Genera! Counsel 

Mesa Air Group 

410 North 44lll Stree:!:, Suite 700 

Phoenix, .t;Z 85008 

Christopher Pappa1oonou 

Director, legal Affairs 

Mesa. Air Grtwp 

410 North 44t~~ Street, Suite 700 

Phoenb:, AZ fl!i0f1ll
#### In the Matter of Adolfo Pinales, Appellant, v Theodore C. Reid, Respondent.

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent dated December 20, 1986, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner to be in violation of Inmate Rule 113.12 and imposed a penalty, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered March 11, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Eiber, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4352 

To amend the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 

2006 to require reporting by the Secretary of Education on requests 

for funding research that were not granted and had the greatest potential 

for improving career and technical education, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2017 

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 to require reporting by the Secretary 

of Education on requests for funding research that were 

not granted and had the greatest potential for improving 

career and technical education, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Missed Opportunities 

5 in Career and Technical Education Act of 2017’’. 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4352 IH

1 SEC. 2. ANNUAL REPORTING ON MISSED OPPORTUNITIES. 

2 Part A of title III of the Carl D. Perkins Career and 

3 Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2391 et seq.) 

4 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 319. ANNUAL REPORTING ON MISSED OPPORTUNI6 TIES. 

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than the last day of 

8 the first fiscal quarter following the end of each fiscal 

9 year, the Secretary shall submit a report to Congress— 

10 ‘‘(1) identifying— 

11 ‘‘(A) the total number of requests that 

12 were under review during such fiscal year by 

13 any office, agency, institute, or center of the 

14 Department of Education for funding, in whole 

15 or in part, career and technical education pro16 grams; and 

17 ‘‘(B) of such total number— 

18 ‘‘(i) the number of such requests that 

19 were granted; 

20 ‘‘(ii) the number of such requests that 

21 were denied; and 

22 ‘‘(iii) the number of such requests 

23 that remained pending at the end of the 

24 fiscal year; and 

25 ‘‘(2) with respect to the requests described in 

26 clauses (ii) and (iii) of paragraph (1)(B), identifying 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4352 IH

1 the requests with the greatest potential for improv2 ing career and technical education. 

3 ‘‘(b) TRADE SECRETS AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMA4 TION.—This section does not authorize the Secretary to 

5 disclose any information that is a trade secret or confiden6 tial information subject to section 552(b)(4) of title 5, 

7 United States Code, or section 1905 of title 18, United 

8 States Code.’’. 

Æ 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**ITZCHAK E. KORNFELD**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **No. 1333 Disciplinary Docket No. 3**

**No. 177 DB 2007 Attorney Registration No.**  **68345 (Philadelphia)** 

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 16 th**  **day of December, 2014, upon consideration of the Rep ort and**  **Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board and Dissenting Opinion dated August 27,**  **2014, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted. Pursuant to Rule 218(f), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is di**  **rected to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processin**  **g of the Petition for Reinstatement.**
**EXHIBIT31.1**

I, Robert E.Driscoll, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, ofMirant Americas Generation, LLC;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.                 Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.                Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.                 Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the registrant’s board of managers (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a.                 All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b.                Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date:November 13, 2006
| By:      | /s/ ROBERT E.  DRISCOLL                                                                       |   |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| * * | Robert E. Driscoll*President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive  Officer)* |   |

 

----
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 2:01 PM

To: 'info@terraimaging.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - Terra Imaging LLC (FAA-2015-0412)

Dear Mr. Karl Engstrom:  

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2015‐

0412).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

* Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1,

Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1.  If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed‐set filming from

your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.  

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e‐mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 5/20/2015.  If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.  

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.  

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
# C_2008313EN.01005902.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/59

---

Action brought on 13 October 2008 — Ketselidou v Commission

(Case F-81/08)

(2008/C 313/108)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Zoe Ketselidou (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant's request for revision of the calculation of the pension annuities to be taken into account for the transfer of pension rights acquired in Greece to the Community scheme.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision dated 10 January 2008 in which the Appointing Authority rejected the applicant's request for revision of the calculation of the pension annuities that she had acquired in the pension scheme of the institutions of the European Communities as a result of the transfer of pension rights by Greek social security institutions; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision dated 10 January 2008 in which the Appointing Authority rejected the applicant's request for revision of the calculation of the pension annuities that she had acquired in the pension scheme of the institutions of the European Communities as a result of the transfer of pension rights by Greek social security institutions;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
# C_2021072EN.01001702.xml

| 1.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/17

---

Order of the President of the Court of 23 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Vicenza — Italy) — AV v Minister for Justice and the Italian Republic

(Case C-834/19) (1)

(2021/C 72/25)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 54, 17.2.2020.

---