alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008171EN.01004201.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/42

---

Action brought on 13 May 2008 — Commission v I.D. FOS Research

(Case T-170/08)

(2008/C 171/81)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: R. Lyal and W. Roels, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: I.D. FOS Research EEIG (Mol, Belgium)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | order the defendant to pay to the Commission the sum of EUR 21 599,26 together with default interest in the sum of EUR 6 375,94; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay to the Commission the sum of EUR 21 599,26 together with default interest in the sum of EUR 6 375,94;

| — | order the defendant to pay default interest of EUR 3,99 per day from 8 January 2007 until the date of full repayment of the debt; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay default interest of EUR 3,99 per day from 8 January 2007 until the date of full repayment of the debt;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The European Community, represented by the Commission, entered into Contract BRPR-CT-95-0099 with the defendant on 12 December 1995. The contract concerned a project on improved quality assurance and methods of grouting post-tensioned cables. The contract and the project came into being within the framework of the specific programme for research and technological development, including demonstration, in the field of industrial and materials technologies (1).

1

An examination of the defendant's performance of the contract was undertaken after completion of the contract. On the basis of the results of that examination, the Commission decided to demand repayment of part of the sums paid, in accordance with the general conditions of the contract.

---

(1)  Council Decision 94/571/EC of 27 July 1994 adopting a specific programme for research and technological development, including demonstration, in the field of industrial and materials technologies (1994-1998) (OJ 1994 L 222, p. 19).

1

---
**Exhibit 31.2****Certifications for Form 10-Q**I, Daniel L. Erickson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Alliance Bancshares California;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a—15(e) and15d—15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 14, 2007 Name: /s/ Daniel L. Erickson       Title: Executive Vice President    Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4569 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4569

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To require counterterrorism information sharing coordination, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Counterterrorism Information Sharing 
Improvement Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. COUNTERTERRORISM INFORMATION SHARING COORDINATION.

    (a) In General.--The President, acting though the Secretary of 
Homeland Security, shall ensure that, for counterterrorism purposes, 
the Department of the Homeland Security has access to biographic and 
biometric data collected by the United States Government on individuals 
associated with a terrorist organization.
    (b) Coordination.--The President shall direct the heads of relevant 
Federal departments and agencies to coordinate with the Secretary of 
Homeland Security to minimize and overcome any administrative, 
technical, capacity, or classification challenges to carrying out 
subsection (a).
    (c) Protections.--The Secretary of Homeland Security shall ensure 
that all relevant laws, rules, and procedures, including the section 
552(a) of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the 
``Privacy Act'' or the ``Privacy Act of 1974''), regarding 
classification levels and civil rights and civil liberties are followed 
while seeking to carry out subsection (a).
    (d) Report to Congress.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
        the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security 
        shall, consistent with the protection of classified 
        information, submit to the Committee on Homeland Security of 
        the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland 
        Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report on the 
        implementation of this section.
            (2) Contents.--The report required under paragraph (1) 
        shall include a description of how the data referred to in 
        subsection (a) is utilized for Department of Homeland Security 
        screening and vetting purposes and any challenges associated 
        with incorporating such data into departmental screening and 
        vetting systems.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 9, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4569

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To require counterterrorism information sharing coordination, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
Exhibit 32          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFCIER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly Report of TheraBiogen, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we, Kelly T. Hickel, Chief Executive Officer and Robert
Hipple, Manager of CF Consulting, LLC, principal financial officer,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
Material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

December 9, 2008

/s/ Kelly T. Hickel
--------------------------------------
Kelly T. Hickel
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Robert Hipple
--------------------------------------
Robert Hipple, Manager
CF Consulting, LLC
Principal Financial Officer
# C_2011055EN.01003403.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/34

---

Order of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — FIFA v OHIM — Ferrero (WORLD CUP 2006 and Others)

(Joined Cases T-444/08 to T-448/08) (1)

1

2011/C 55/62

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 6.12.2008.

1

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 18, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 133219 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133219 COA: 271000 Wayne CC: 99-002051-01 WESLEY D. SANDERS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 27, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d0711 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 18, 2007

Clerk
EXHIBIT 13.2

906 Certification

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company
Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Han Zhihao, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of
the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) , as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Date: June 28, 2007



By:

/s/ Han ZhihaoName:

Han ZhihaoTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1475]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. ADAM KINZINGER

                              of illinois

                    in the house of representatives

                      Tuesday, September 11, 2012

  Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois. Mr. Speaker, due to transportation issues 
beyond my control, I was unable to cast my votes on Monday, September 
10, 2012. If able to cast those votes I would have voted Aye on H.R. 
6122, to Revise the Authority of the Librarian of Congress to accept 
gifts on behalf of the Library; H.R. 2139, the Lions Club Commemorative 
Coin Act; and H.R. 6186, to Require a study of community-based flood 
insurance options.

                          ____________________
```
**Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 January 2010 – G-Star Raw Denim v OHIM – ESGW (G Stor)**

**(Case T-309/08)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the Community figurative mark G Stor – Earlier national and Community word and figurative marks G-STAR and G-STAR RAW DENIM – Relative ground for refusal – Absence of similarity between the marks – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark enjoying a reputation – Protection of well-known earlier mark extended to dissimilar goods or services (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(5)) (see
paras 25, 36, 38)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 April 2008 (R 1232/2007-1), relating to opposition proceedings between G‐Star Raw Denim kft and ESGW Holdings Ltd. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | ESWG Holdings Ltd |
| Community trade mark sought: | The figurative mark ‘G Stor’ for goods in Class 9 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | G-Star Raw Denim kft |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | Benelux trade mark registration No 545551 of the word mark ‘G‐STAR’ for goods in Class 25; Community trade mark registration No 3445401 of the word/figurative mark ‘G‐STAR’ for goods in Classes 9 and 25; Community trade mark registration No 3444262 of the word mark ‘G‐Star’ for goods in Classes 9 and 25; earlier well‐known trade mark ‘G‐Star’ protected in various countries for goods in Class 25; Community trade mark registration No 3444171 of the mark ‘G‐STAR RAW DENIM’ for goods in Classes 9 and 35; Netherlands trade name G‐Star International BV |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition upheld; application dismissed in its entirety |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Contested decision annulled; opposition dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders G-Star Raw Denim kft to pay the costs. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          34,756
<SECURITIES>                                     1,028
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,032
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,332
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,512
<PP&E>                                           4,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,276
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,738
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,972
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,718
<SALES>                                         58,387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,387
<CGS>                                           26,219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,631
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,492
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,242
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,242
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08



</TABLE>
# C_2009282EN.01000701.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 October 2009 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Nivelles — Belgium) — Ketty Leyman v Institut national d’assurance maladie-invalidité (INAMI)

(Case C-3/08) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social security schemes - Invalidity benefits - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Article 40(3) - Different benefit schemes in the Member States - Disadvantages for migrant workers - Contributions on which there is no return)

2009/C 282/11

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal du travail de Nivelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ketty Leyman

Applicant:

Defendant: Institut national d’assurance maladie-invalidité (INAMI)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal du travail de Nivelles (Belgium) — Lawfulness, in the light of Article 18 EC, of Council Regulation No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ 1971 149, p. 2) as amended — Invalidity allowance — Obstacle to the exercise of free movement as a result of the existence of different indemnification schemes

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 39 EC must be interpreted as precluding application by the competent authorities of a Member State of national legislation which, in accordance with Article 40(3)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community, in the version amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 647/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 April 2005, makes acquisition of the right to invalidity benefits subject to the condition that a period of primary incapacity of one year has elapsed, where such application has the result that a migrant worker has paid into the social security scheme of that Member State contributions on which there is no return and is therefore at a disadvantage by comparison with a non-migrant worker.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 29.3.2008.

1

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, James B. Boyd, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K/A of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: April 29, 2008

 

 
|   | /s/ JAMES B. BOYD                                        |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | James B. Boyd                                                 |
|   | *Senior Vice President, Finance and  Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.5


                 FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT ("Amendment"), made
effective as of this 18th day of April, 2007, by and between DEACON ENTERPRISES,
INC., a Michigan Corporation, whose address is 600 South Deacon, Detroit,
Michigan 48217 ("Seller"), and VOYAGER PETROLEUM, INC., a Nevada corporation,
whose address is 16 East Hinsdale Ave., Hinsdale, Illinois 60521, ("Purchaser").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

         WHEREAS, on January 19, 2007 Seller and Purchaser entered into a
Purchase and Sale Agreement for land situated in the City of Detroit, County of
Wayne, and State of Michigan ("Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser desire to amend the Agreement;

         NOW THEREFORE, Seller and Purchaser agree as follows:

1.       EXTENSION OF INSPECTION PERIOD. Purchaser's right to inspect and
         evaluate the Property and otherwise determine whether Purchaser shall
         purchase the property (the "Inspection Period") shall be extended until
         May 18, 2007 at 5:00 p.m. EST without additional cost to Purchaser.

2.       COUNTERPARTS AND FACSIMILE. This Amendment may be executed in any
         number of counterparts all of which when taken together, shall
         constitute one in the same instrument. Facsimile signatures and
         e-mailed PDF versions of signatures shall be deemed originals for the
         purposes of execution and delivery of this Amendment.

         The parties have executed this Amendment on the day and date first
above written.

SELLER:                                     PURCHASER:

DEACON ENTERPRISES, INC.                    VOYAGER PETROLEUM, INC.


By: /s/ Verlin Eppert                       By: /s/ Sebastien C. DuFort
    ------------------------                    -------------------------------
    VERLIN EPPERT, President                    SEBASTIEN DUFORT, President