alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Notes

Creating a Culture of Health in Appalachia: Disparities and Bright SpotsJuly 2018Bright Spots Report Source DataThe data and source information in this file were created for the Identifying Bright Spots in Appalachian Health: Statistical Analysis report, which is one of four quantitative and qualitative research reports in "Creating a Culture of Health in Appalachia: Disparities and Bright Spots."Table 12 contains general information on the Euclidean distance analysis; Table 13 contains each Appalachian county and its best Euclidean match out of the 10 case study counties; and Table 14 contains each Appalachian county and its best Euclidean match out of the 42 Bright Spot counties.Funding for this project was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Appalachian Regional Commission. The nonprofit Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky was the grantee and fiscal agent for the project. PDA, Inc., in Raleigh, North Carolina, prepared this report in collaboration with the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Appalachian Regional Commission.

# Euclidean Distance

# Match to Case Study

# Match to Bright Spots
# C_2008223EN.01004702.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/47

---

Action brought on 13 June 2008 — Mineralbrunnen Rhön-Sprudel Egon Schindel v OHIM — Schwarzbräu (Alaska)

(Case T-226/08)

(2008/C 223/83)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Mineralbrunnen Rhön-Sprudel Egon Schindel GmbH (Ebersburg, Germany) (represented by: P. Wadenbach, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Schwarzbräu GmbH (Zusmarshausen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 April 2008 (Case R 1124/2004-4); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 April 2008 (Case R 1124/2004-4);

| — | cancel Community trade mark No 505 503 ‘Alaska’ entirely, on account of the existence of absolute grounds for refusal; |
| --- | --- |

—

cancel Community trade mark No 505 503 ‘Alaska’ entirely, on account of the existence of absolute grounds for refusal;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs;

| — | in the alternative to the second head of claim, declare Community trade mark No 505 503 ‘Alaska’ invalid in respect, at least, of the following goods: ‘Mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks in class 32’. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative to the second head of claim, declare Community trade mark No 505 503 ‘Alaska’ invalid in respect, at least, of the following goods: ‘Mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks in class 32’.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Word mark ‘Alaska’ for goods in class 32 (Community trade mark No 505 503).

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Schwarzbräu GmbH.

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: The applicant.

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Application for a declaration of invalidity of the trade mark concerned granted in part.

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the contested decision and dismissal of the application for a declaration of invalidity of the trade mark concerned.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1).

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
# C_2010234EN.01003302.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2010 — Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt v Commission

(Case T-396/08) (1)

1

(State aid - Training aid - Decision declaring the aid to be in part compatible and in part incompatible with the common market - Need for the aid - Positive external effects - Obligation to give reasons)

2010/C 234/58

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Freistaat Sachsen (Germany) and Land Sachsen-Anhalt (Germany) (represented by: T. Müller-Ibold and T. Graf, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. França, K. Gross and B. Martenczuk, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the partial annulment of Commission Decision 2008/878/EC of 2 July 2008 on State aid which Germany is planning to implement for DHL (OJ 2008 L 312, p. 31)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 327 of 20.12.2008.

1

---
Summary of Executive Bonus Arrangements



 EXHIBIT 10.55 
  
 Summary of Executive Bonus Arrangements for 2004 Bonuses 
 and in respect of Restricted Stock Grants in 2005 
  
 On March 15, 2005, the Board of Directors of Jameson Inns, Inc. (the “Company”), approved the grant of cash bonuses and shares of restricted
stock to be awarded to the named executive officers in recognition for work performed and goals accomplished during 2004. The stock grants will all be made on April 1, 2005 pursuant to the Jameson 2003 Stock Incentive Plan. One-third of the
restricted shares will vest on each of the first three anniversary dates of the date of grant. The bonuses and stock grants were previously approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, subject to final approval by the entire
Board. 
  
 The amounts of the bonus awards and the numbers of
shares of restricted stock to be awarded to executive officers listed below are: 
  

						
	 Executive Officer

	  	Cash Bonus Amount

	  	Number of Restricted Shares


	 Thomas W. Kitchin, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
	  	$	100,000	  	100,000
			
	 Craig R. Kitchin, President and Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	50,000	  	50,000
			
	 Steven A. Curlee, Vice President – Legal and General Counsel
	  	$	25,000	  	35,000
			
	 Martin D. Brew, Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer
	  	$	15,000	  	30,000

  
 The Board of Directors
further authorized the Company to pay as an additional bonus to each named grantee of restricted stock a cash amount sufficient to pay the federal and state income taxes incurred by such individual as a result of the vesting of the shares of
restricted stock. The bonuses are to be paid only if and when the restricted shares vest.
# C_2008272EN.01002701.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/27

---

Action brought on 19 June 2008 — Abadía Retuerta v OHIM (CUVÉE PALOMAR)

(Case T-237/08)

(2008/C 272/52)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Abadía Retuerta, S.A. (Sardón de Duero, Spain) (represented by X. Fàbrega Sabaté and Curell Aguilà, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 2 April 2008 in Case R 1185/2007-1, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 2 April 2008 in Case R 1185/2007-1, and

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘CUVÉE PALOMAR’ for goods in Class 33 (Application for Registration No 5.501.937).

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application for registration.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The application for the Community mark in question does not infringe Article 7(1)(j) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) since it does not contain or consist of a false geographic indication.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
EXHIBIT 2.1


ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT


TO THE


ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION


OF


MEDICAL CONNECTIONS HOLDINGS, INC.


(Document #: P99000042983)







Pursuant to the provisions of section 607.1006 of the Florida Business Corporation Act, MEDICAL CONNECTIONS HOLDINGS, INC. (the "Corporation"), adopts the following amendment to its Articles of Incorporation:





FIRST:  Article 4.1 of the Articles of Incorporation is hereby amended to read as follows:





4.1           Authorized Shares:  The total number of shares of capital stock that the Corporation has the authority to issue is one hundred thirty million (130,000,000) shares; consisting of one hundred twenty five million (125,000,000) shares of common stock $.001 par value per share and five million (5,000,000) shares of preferred stock, $.001 par value.





The foregoing amendment was authorized and adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors and approved by the shareholders owning a majority of the outstanding voting shares pursuant to the written consent of the shareholders in lieu of a meeting on June 1, 2010.  The number of votes cast for the amendment by the shareholders was sufficient for approval.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed these Articles of Amendment as of this 30th day of June, 2010. MEDICAL CONNECTIONS HOLDINGS, INC./s/ Brian R. NeillName: Brian R. NeillTitle:  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 21.1


                              List of Subsidiaries
                              --------------------

                             IDM ENVIRONMENTAL CORP.


    Name                                         State of Incorporation
  -------                                       -------------------------

IDM Energy Corp.                                     Delaware
IDM Environmental of Massachusetts, Inc.             Massachusetts
IDM Asia Corp.                                       Delaware
IDM Environmental Ventures, Inc.                     Delaware
Seven Star International Holding, Inc.               British Virgin Isl.
Kortmann Polonia                                     Poland
Global Waste & Energy, Inc.                          Alberta
Global Waste & Energy, Inc.                          Delaware
CWC de El Salvador S.A. de C.V.                      El Salvador
Empresa de Poder y Energia de
 El Salvador S.A. de C.V.                            El Salvador
# City of Buena Vista - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission Executive Director Bonnie Riedesel Email c&#115;&#112;&#x64;&#x63;&#x40;&#x63;s&#112;&#100;&#99;&#x2e;&#x6f;&#x72;gThe post Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
**Exhibit 31.2****Certificationsfor Form 10-Q**I, Daniel L. Erickson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Alliance Bancshares California;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a—15(e) and15d—15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: May 15, 2007 Name:
<PAGE>   1




                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Coho Energy, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-87204, 33-87206, 33-87208, 333-13577 and 333-13579) on Form S-8 of Coho
Energy, Inc. of our report dated February 24, 1995, relating to the
consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders' equity, and cash flows of
Coho Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1994, which
report appears in the December 31, 1996, annual report on Form 10-K of Coho
Energy, Inc.

                                       KPMG Peat Marwick LLP




Dallas, Texas
March 13, 1997
# C_2008079EN.01003102.xml

| 29.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/31

---

Action brought on 21 January 2008 — Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung v Commission

(Case T-34/08)

(2008/C 79/61)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung e.V. (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: B. Henning, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Commission's decision of 16 November 2007 disallowing part of the applicant's costs in the context of the ‘Daphne Grant Agreement JAI/DAP/2004-2/052/W’; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission's decision of 16 November 2007 disallowing part of the applicant's costs in the context of the ‘Daphne Grant Agreement JAI/DAP/2004-2/052/W’;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In May 2005, the applicant and the Commission signed an agreement on support for a project in connection with the Daphne II programme (1). By letter of 16 November 2007, the defendant sent the applicant a revised calculation of the payment to the applicant that was still outstanding, in which part of the applicant's costs were deemed to be ineligible for support. The applicant brought the present action against that decision.

1

The applicant claims in support of its action that the contested decision is based on an erroneous assessment of the facts. In particular, adequate supporting evidence was inappropriately regarded as being inadequate, and costs of employing temporary assistants and trainees, together with costs provided for in the budget and certain travel costs were inappropriately disallowed.

---

(1)  Decision No 803/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 adopting a programme of Community action (2004 to 2008) to prevent and combat violence against children, young people and women and to protect victims and groups at risk (the Daphne II programme) (OJ 2004 L 143, p. 1).

1

---
June 19, 2000

22077

#### Galasinao v. Macanas

Affirmed
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iPayment, Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I Gregory S.
Daily, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (a)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

This Certification is executed as of August 4, 2005.

                      /s/ GREGORY S. DAILY
                      -----------------------------
                      GREGORY S. DAILY
                      CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                                  Page 25 of 26
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1327 

KA 12-00814 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DANIEL J. BOYDEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

WILLIAMS, HEINL, MOODY & BUSCHMAN, P.C., AUBURN (MARIO J. GUTIERREZ OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

JON E. BUDELMANN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AUBURN (CHRISTOPHER T. VALDINA OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Cayuga County Court (Thomas G.

Leone, J.), rendered March 20, 2012. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree

(two counts) and obstructing governmental administration in the second

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: In appeal No. 1, defendant appeals from a judgment

convicting him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, two counts of

assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [3]) in connection

with an altercation with deputies at the Cayuga County Jail and, in

appeal No. 2, he appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea

of guilty of, inter alia, robbery in the first degree (§ 160.15 [3])

in connection with his robbery of a convenience store. Defendant

pleaded guilty to all counts of the two indictments in exchange for a

sentence promise of concurrent determinate terms of imprisonment, to

be followed by a period of postrelease supervision. By failing to

move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction in

each appeal, defendant failed to preserve for our review his

contention in each appeal that his plea of guilty was not voluntarily

entered (see People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726, rearg denied 86 NY2d

839; People v Theall, 109 AD3d 1107, 1107). In any event, defendant’s

contention is belied by the record of the plea proceeding in each

appeal (see People v Weakfall, 108 AD3d 1115, 1115, lv denied 21 NY3d

1078). The bargained-for sentence is not unduly harsh and severe.

Entered: December 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Huntington Preferred
Capital, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael J. McMennamin, President of the Company (principal
executive officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                           /s/ Michael J. McMennamin
                                     ----------------------------------
                                           Michael J. McMennamin
                                           President
                                           (principal executive officer)
                                           August 19, 2002
#### Marshall Bros., Inc., Appellant, v Economy Paving Co., Inc., Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs *(see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy,*140 AD2d 988; *Chase Manhattan Bank v Roberts & Roberts,*63 AD2d 566, 567; *see also,*CPLR 5501). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J.— Trial Order of Dismissal.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James J. Maguire, Jr., chief executive officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

James J. Maguire, Jr.
------------------------------------
James J. Maguire, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 19, 2004