alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**     Pursuant to section 906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley Act of    2002*(subsections (a) and (b) of    Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, *United    States Code*), each of the undersigned officers of Potash    Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (the “Company”), does    hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:     The Annual Report on    Form 10-K    for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the    “Form 10-K”),    of the Company fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the *Securities Exchange Act of    1934*and information contained in the    Form 10-K    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial    condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date: February 28, 2008     By: /s/ WILLIAM J. DOYLE    William J. Doyle*President and Chief Executive Officer*     Date: February 28, 2008     By: /s/ WAYNE R. BROWNLEE    Wayne R. Brownlee*Executive Vice President, Treasurer and**Chief Financial Officer*     The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to    the    Form 10-K    pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of    Regulation S-K,    section 906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,    Chapter 63 of Title 18, *United States Code*)    and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the    Form 10-K.
#### Richard L. HOFFMEISTER, Appellant (Plaintiff-Appellant below), v. John McINTOSH, Appellee (Defendant-Appellee below).

No. 2941.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Sept. 13, 1961.

R. Lauren Moran, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Spence, Hill, Oeland & Tschirgi, River-ton, for appellee.

Before BLUME, C. J., and PARKER, HARNSBERGER, and McINTYRE, JJ.

Mr. Justice PARKER

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellee has presented a petition for rehearing in which he emphasizes that this court has overlooked the appellant’s delay in filing a transcript of the county commissioners’ proceedings. Since any objection on that ground was waived at the pretrial hearing, the timeliness of the filing was not discussed in the original opinion and does not merit consideration here.

Appellee requests that the court give specific direction regarding the further procedures in the instant case, especially as to what may be considered by the district court on appeal. There is no occasion to enter into a discussion of this subject which has been considered many times both as to appeals from agencies whose authority is constitutional1 and from those whose authority, resides solely in statute.2 The controlling statute in the instant case provides for an *appeal,*and that provision should not be enlarged. This means, of course, that the trial in the district court will be a review of the record *824and not a trial de novo. However, in that connection it should be remembered that such administrative tribunals are obligated in their disposition of cases to consider all relevant evidence and argument,3 and in an appeal from an inferior tribunal, the minutes, if incomplete, are subject to supplementation by competent evidence which would show actual occurrences before the agency.4

Rehearing denied.

1

. Rayburne v. Queen, 78 Wyo. 359, 326 P. 2d 1108; Howard v. Lindmier, 67 Wyo. 78, 214 P.2d 737.

2

. School District No. 9 in County of Fremont v. District Boundary Board in and for Fremont County, Wyo., 351 P.2d 106; Whitesides v. Council of City of Cheyenne, 78 Wyo. 80, 319 P.2d 520.

3

. Lake De Smet Reservoir Co. v. Kaufmann, 75 Wyo. 87, 292 P.2d 482.

4

. School District No. 9 in County of Fremont v. District Boundary Board in and for Fremont County, Wyo., 351 P.2d 106.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RIVER OAKS FURNITURE, INC. FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             218
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,277
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,364
<INVENTORY>                                     19,565
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,689
<PP&E>                                          34,337
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,442
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,570
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           561
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,398
<SALES>                                        124,686
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               124,686
<CGS>                                          110,835
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  125,480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,357
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,997)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,750)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,247)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (279)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,526)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.68)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2018408EN.01003801.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/38

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Nürnberg (Germany) lodged on 6 August 2018 — QE v Sun Express Germany GmbH

(Case C-516/18)

(2018/C 408/51)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Nürnberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: QE

Defendant: Sun Express Germany GmbH

The case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice by order of the Court of 22 August 2018.

---
**Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2009 – Régie communale autonome du stade Luc Varenne v Belgian State**

**(Case C‐483/08)**

First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure – Sixth VAT Directive – Article 10(1) and (2) – Recovery of tax improperly deducted – Starting point of the limitation period

Tax provisions – Harmonisation of laws – Turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax – Recovery of tax – Limitation period (Council Directive 77/388, Art. 10) (see paras 38-42, operative part.)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Reference for a preliminary ruling – Tribunal de Première Instance de Mons (Belgium) – Interpretation of Article 10 of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) – Concepts of ‘chargeable event’ and ‘chargeability of tax’ – Starting point of limitation period for an action for recovery of the tax – Date when invoice is issued or date when the tax return in which the taxable person claims his right to deduct tax is lodged? |

**Operative part**

Article 10 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating
to turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 2002/38/EC
of 7 May 2002, must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude national legislation and administrative practice fixing
the starting point of the limitation period for an action for recovery of improperly deducted value added tax as the day on
which the taxable person lodged the VAT return in which he claimed for the first time a right to deduct.
# McDowell - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Creating PPE for Nurses and School Officials in Western North Carolina STEMwork in western North Carolina (WNCSTEMwork) is a teacher professional development initiative of the Kenan Institute for Engineering, Technology, and Science at North Carolina State University. With ARC support, this program supports six middle and high school teachers from ten counties as they develop their capacity to lead and sustain STEM workforce education. In April [&#8230;]The post Creating PPE for Nurses and School Officials in Western North Carolina appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Foothills Regional Commission Executive Director Dana Stansbury Email d&#115;&#x74;&#x61;n&#115;&#x62;&#x75;r&#121;&#x40;&#x66;o&#111;&#x74;&#x68;i&#108;&#x6c;&#x73;r&#101;&#103;&#x69;&#x6f;n&#46;&#x6f;&#x72;gThe post Foothills Regional Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2008142EN.01004002.xml

| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/40

---

Action brought on 20 March 2008 — Meister v OHIM

(Case F-37/08)

(2008/C 142/76)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Herbert Meister (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: H.-J. Zimmermann, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the implied decision of OHIM rejecting the applicant's complaint concerning alleged errors in his periodical report.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the implied decision of the President of OHIM of 3 January 2008 rejecting the applicant's complaint of 27 August 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the implied decision of the President of OHIM of 3 January 2008 rejecting the applicant's complaint of 27 August 2007;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the applicant damages (in an amount to be determined by the Tribunal) for non-material loss; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the applicant damages (in an amount to be determined by the Tribunal) for non-material loss;

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs;

| — | In the alternative, annul the decision of the President of OHIM, transmitted to the applicant on 7 January 2008, rejecting the applicant's complaint of 27 August 2007. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, annul the decision of the President of OHIM, transmitted to the applicant on 7 January 2008, rejecting the applicant's complaint of 27 August 2007.

---
# C_2008209EN.01007401.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/74

---

Action brought on 9 June 2008 — De Britto Patricio-Dias v Commission

(Case F-56/08)

(2008/C 209/136)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jorge De Britto Patricio-Dias (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Massaux, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the appointing authority's decision to reject the applicant's request that his children be entitled to primary insurance cover.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the appointing authority's decision No R/559/07 of 10 March 2008; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the appointing authority's decision No R/559/07 of 10 March 2008;

| — | Rule that his children are entitled to primary insurance cover; |
| --- | --- |

—

Rule that his children are entitled to primary insurance cover;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
#### Irwin Spolan, Appellant, *v.*Rocoo Capua et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

October 2, 1959.

*783
      *Maxwell Cohen*for appellant.

*Santo W. Crupe*and *Joseph V. Costa*for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

The purported rental of additional garage space, as commercial space, in conjunction with the rental of the housing accommodations, was in effect the rental of a service in connection with the apartment *(Einhorn*v. *100 E. 21st St. Garage,*278 App. Div. 848; *Fromm*v. *Meyerowitz,*197 Misc. 271). The collection of a separate rental for said garage space without first obtaining authorization therefor from the Rent Administrator was an overcharge of rent *(Baum*v. *Crosfield,*279 App. Div. 1088).

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $30 costs to plaintiff, and judgment directed for plaintiff for the sum of $356.50 plus $100 attorney’s fees, with appropriate costs in the court below.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.
# C_2009233EN.01002105.xml

| 26.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/21

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 July 2009 — Fusco v OHIM — Fusco International (FUSCOLLECTION)

(Case T-48/08) (1)

1

2009/C 233/42

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

1

---
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: August 13, 2015 520166

________________________________ In the Matter of ELQUIADES MORALES, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: June 8, 2015 Before: Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Rose and Devine, JJ.

__________ Elquiades Morales, Pine City, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Determination confirmed. No opinion. Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Rose and Devine, JJ., concur.-2- 520166

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
# Colbert - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Northwest Alabama Council of Local Governments Executive Director Keith Jones Email kjones&#64;&#110;&#97;&#99;&#111;&#108;&#103;&#x2e;&#x6f;&#x72;&#x67;The post Northwest Alabama Council of Local Governments appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2018104EN.01005202.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/52

---

Action brought on 26 January 2018 — NGV v EUIPO (WEIN FÜR PROFIS)

(Case T-56/18)

(2018/C 104/67)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: NGV GmbH (Wildeshausen, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and M. Alber, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘WEIN FÜR PROFIS’ — Application for registration No 15 326 549

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 November 2017 in Case R 501/2017-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001.

---
# C_2009044EN.01007601.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/76

---

Action brought on 27 November 2008 — Füller-Tomlinson v Parliament

(Case F-97/08)

(2009/C 44/136)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Paulette Füller-Tomlinson (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision setting the proportion of partial permanent invalidity attributable to occupational disease at 20 %, and alternatively an order that the defendant pay compensation for the non-material damage suffered by the applicant.

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of 9 April 2008 of the Head of the Pensions and Social Insurance Unit, setting, in Article 3, the proportion of partial permanent invalidity attributable to occupational disease at 20 %; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 9 April 2008 of the Head of the Pensions and Social Insurance Unit, setting, in Article 3, the proportion of partial permanent invalidity attributable to occupational disease at 20 %;

| — | so far as necessary, annul the decision rejecting the complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

so far as necessary, annul the decision rejecting the complaint;

| — | alternatively, order the defendant to pay the sum of EUR 12 000 as compensation for the non-material damage suffered by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

alternatively, order the defendant to pay the sum of EUR 12 000 as compensation for the non-material damage suffered by the applicant;

| — | order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

---
EXHIBIT 22

Subsidiaries of the
Registrant

Brazauro Resources
Corporation(a British Columbia corporation)

Owns
100% of the following corporations:

Star U.S. Inc. (a Delaware
corporation)

and

Brazauro Holdings
(Brazauro) Ltd.
(a British Columbia corporation)

Brazauro
Resources Corporation owns 98% of:

Jaguar Resources do Brasil
Ltda.
(a Brazilian corporation)

Brazauro Holdings (Brazauro) Ltd. owns 2% of:

Jaguar Resources do Brasil
Ltda.
(a Brazilian corporation)

Star U.S. Inc. Owns 100% of the
following three corporations:

Diamond Operations, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
Diamond Exploration, Inc. (an Arkansas corporation) 
Continental Diamonds, Inc. (an Arkansas corporation)

---
# C_2012151EN.01003302.xml

| 26.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/33

---

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 March 2012 — Atlantean v Commission

(Case T-368/08) (1)

1

2012/C 151/57

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 22.11.2008.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5710]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. PEARCE:
        H.R. 6344.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the 
     United States grants Congress the power to enact this law.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6054]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      MESSAGES FROM THE PRESIDENT

  Messages from the President of the United States were communicated to 
the Senate by Mr. Pate, one of his secretaries.

                          ____________________
```
Certificate of Trust of BAC Capital Trust XI



 Exhibit 4.5 
  

CERTIFICATE OF TRUST 
  
 The undersigned, the trustees of BAC Capital Trust XI, desiring to form a statutory trust pursuant to Delaware Statutory Trust Act, 12 Del.
C. § 3810, hereby certify as follows: 
  

	 	(a)	The name of the statutory trust being formed hereby (the “Trust”) is “BAC Capital Trust XI.” 

  

	 	(b)	The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust which has its principal place of business in the State of Delaware is as follows: 

  
 The Bank of New York (Delaware) 
 502 White Clay Center, Route 273 
 Newark,
Delaware 19711 
  

	 	(c)	This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of the date of filing. 

  
 Dated: March 30, 2005 
  

	
	
	 /S/ JAMES T. HOUGHTON

	 Name:   James T. Houghton

	 Title: Regular Trustee

	
	 /S/ KAREN A. GOSNELL

	 Name:   Karen A. Gosnell

	 Title: Regular Trustee



  

			
	 THE BANK OF NEW YORK
 (DELAWARE), as Delaware
Trustee

		
	By:	 	 /s/ KRISTINE K. GULLO

	 Name:
	 	   Kristine K. Gullo

	 Title:
	 	 Assistant Vice President
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of GDT TEK, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Albert Reda, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Albert Reda
---------------------------
Albert Reda,
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
July 7, 2010