alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Harry P. Beugelink, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of MASTER  DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEMS, INC.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)  presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 22, 2005

/s/ Harry P. Beugelink
------------------------
By: Harry P. Beugelink
Principal Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Curtis Scrivens, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously modified on the law, and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant entered into a plea bargain pursuant to which he pled guilty to a Superior Court Information that charged him with attempted burglary in the second degree in exchange for a promised sentence of an indeterminate term of two to four years. The record of the plea proceedings does not indicate that defendant was told, nor can it be implied from the record that he understood, that the promised sentence was conditioned upon his appearance on the date originally scheduled for sentencing, and that, if he failed to appear as scheduled, the court *672could impose a greater sentence than promised as part of the plea agreement. "It is fundamental that the sentencing court may not impose a sentence greater than the one bargained for without first affording [defendant the] opportunity to withdraw the [guilty] plea and stand trial” *(People v Annunziata,*105 AD2d 709; *see also, People v Outlaw,*157 AD2d 677; *People v White,*144 AD2d 711). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remit the matter to the sentencing court either to impose the sentence promised as part of the plea agreement or to afford defendant the opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. —Attempted Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Gregory S. Daily, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of iPayment, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date:June 18, 2007 By: /s/ Gregory S. Daily             Gregory S. Daily      Chief Executive Officer
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4609 

AN ACT 

To provide for the conveyance of a Forest Service site in 

Dolores County, Colorado, to be used for a fire station. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4609 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘West Fork Fire Sta3 tion Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 In this Act: 

6 (1) COUNTY.—The term ‘‘County’’ means Dolo7 res County, Colorado. 

8 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

9 the Secretary of Agriculture. 

10 (3) WEST FORK FIRE STATION CONVEYANCE

11 PARCEL.—The term ‘‘West Fork Fire Station Con12 veyance Parcel’’ means the parcel of approximately 

13 3.61 acres of National Forest System land in the 

14 County, as depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Map for 

15 West Fork Fire Station Conveyance Parcel’’ and 

16 dated November 21, 2017. 

17 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF WEST FORK FIRE STATION CON18 VEYANCE PARCEL, DOLORES COUNTY, COLO19 RADO. 

20 (a) IN GENERAL.—On receipt of a request from the 

21 County and subject to such terms and conditions as are 

22 mutually satisfactory to the Secretary and the County, in23 cluding such additional terms as the Secretary determines 

24 to be necessary, the Secretary shall convey to the County 

25 without consideration all right, title, and interest of the 
3 

•HR 4609 EH

1 United States in and to the West Fork Fire Station Con2 veyance Parcel. 

3 (b) COSTS.—Any costs relating to the conveyance 

4 under subsection (a), including processing and transaction 

5 costs, shall be paid by the County. 

6 (c) USE OF LAND.—The land conveyed to the County 

7 under subsection (a) shall be used by the County only for 

8 a fire station, related infrastructure, and roads to facili9 tate access to and through the West Fork Fire Station 

10 Conveyance Parcel. 

11 (d) REVERSION.—If any portion of the land conveyed 

12 under subsection (a) is used in a manner that is incon13 sistent with the use described in subsection (c), the land 

14 shall, at the discretion of the Secretary, revert to the 

15 United States. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 16, 2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4609 

AN ACT 

To provide for the conveyance of a Forest Service 

a fire station. site in Dolores County, Colorado, to be used for
# C_2008313EN.01003601.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/36

---

Action brought on 15 September 2008 — DAI v Commission

(Case T-381/08)

(2008/C 313/65)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: DAI — Sociedade de Desenvolvimento Agro-Industrial, SA (Coruche, Portugal) (represented by: J. da Cruz Vilaça, L. Romão and A. Mestre, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | A declaration that the action is admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

A declaration that the action is admissible;

| — | a decision allowing the action and annulment in part of Commission Decision 2008/445/EC of 11 June 2008 fixing the amounts per Member State of retroactive restructuring aid for growers and undertakings having restructured in the 2006/07 and 2007/08 marketing years in the framework of the temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry of the Community (notified under document number C(2008) 2557) (1), in so far as it refers to the amount of restructuring aid allocated to Portugal to be paid to growers and undertakings having restructured in the 2006/07 and 2007/08 marketing years; |
| --- | --- |

—

a decision allowing the action and annulment in part of Commission Decision 2008/445/EC of 11 June 2008 fixing the amounts per Member State of retroactive restructuring aid for growers and undertakings having restructured in the 2006/07 and 2007/08 marketing years in the framework of the temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry of the Community (notified under document number C(2008) 2557) (1), in so far as it refers to the amount of restructuring aid allocated to Portugal to be paid to growers and undertakings having restructured in the 2006/07 and 2007/08 marketing years;

1

| — | an order that the Commission should pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

an order that the Commission should pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Infringement of Article 1(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1261/2007 (2) and of Article 16a of Regulation (EC) No 1264/2007 (3).

2

3

Breach of the principles of equality, legal certainty and of the non-retroactive effect of laws.

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 156, p. 20.

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1261/2007 of 9 October 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 establishing a temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the Community.

2

(3)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1264/2007 of 26 October 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 968/2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 establishing a temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the Community.

3

---
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 437 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify 

authority under existing grant guidance authorizing use 

of Urban Area Security Initiative and State Homeland 

Security Grant Program funding for enhancing medical 

preparedness, medical surge capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 437 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medical Preparedness 

3 Allowable Use Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. USE OF CERTAIN HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 

5 FUNDS FOR ENHANCING MEDICAL PRE6 PAREDNESS, MEDICAL SURGE CAPACITY, 

7 AND MASS PROPHYLAXIS CAPABILITIES. 

8 Section 2008 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 

9 (6 U.S.C. 609) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)— 

11 (A) by redesignating paragraphs (10) 

12 through (14) as paragraphs (11) through (15), 

13 respectively; and 

14 (B) by inserting after paragraph (9) the 

15 following new paragraph (10): 

16 ‘‘(10) enhancing medical preparedness, medical 

17 surge capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities, in18 cluding the development and maintenance of an ini19 tial pharmaceutical stockpile, including medical kits, 

20 and diagnostics sufficient to protect first responders, 

21 their families, immediate victims, and vulnerable 

22 populations from a chemical or biological event;’’; 

23 and 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 437 RFS

1 (2) in subsection (b)(3)(B), by striking ‘‘sub2 section (a)(10)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)(11)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 31, 

2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit      13.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | 1. | The                Annual Report of SQM on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December                31,                2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully                complies                with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange                Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents,                in all material respects, the financial condition and results of                operations of SQM. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Patricio Contesse G.       |
|-----------------------------------------------|
| Name:                Patricio Contesse G.     |
| Title:                Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:                June 27, 2008            |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      24,686,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               73,505,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,264,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           153,458,000
<PP&E>                                      92,285,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,456,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,375,615,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       72,021,000
<BONDS>                                    764,092,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      361,996,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       107,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  74,718,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,375,615,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           270,364,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              232,930,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          64,506,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (24,251,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   810,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (25,061,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                               3,814,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (21,247,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (6.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (6.27)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5708]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. SMITH of New Jersey:
       H.R. 6292.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article 1, section 8 of the Constitution
```
#### Application of Curless D. GARRETT for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Bail.

No. A-12841.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Dec. 16, 1959.

*1048Shelton Skinner, Shawnee, for petitioner.

Harvey H. Cody, Jr., County Atty., Pottawatomie County, Shawnee, for respondent.

BRETT, Judge.

This is an original petition in habeas corpus brought by Curless D. Garrett, as petitioner, for the purpose of being admitted to bail pending trial upon a charge of the murder of one Marvin Yoder, which charge is now pending against him in Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma.

The verified petition alleges that he is being unlawfully restrained of his liberty in the County Jail of Pottawatomie County by the Sheriff thereof where he is awaiting trial on the aforesaid charge pending in the District Court of said county. He alleges that proof of guilt of the alleged crime is not evident nor the presumption thereof great. It appears he was denied bail by the committing magistrate and the District Judge of said county in habeas corpus proceedings.

On hearing herein, the matter was submitted to this Court on the transcripts of both the proceeding before the committing magistrate and the District Court, the petitioner testifying in his own behalf before District Judge Byrum. It is not necessary to set out the evidence in detail. It is sufficient to say that the evidence offered in his own behalf and by the officers who testified for the state, as the same'appears from this record, entitles the petitioner to bail, since the proof of guilt is not evident nor the presumption thereof great that the petitioner would receive the death penalty or life imprisonment. This conclusion is based upon certain admissions against interest made by one of the alleged accomplices inuring to this petitioner’s, benefit. In any event, this petitioner has. made a sufficient showing to entitle him to bail.

It is therefore ordered that the petitioner-be admitted to bail in the sum of $25,000 to-be approved by the District Court Clerk of' Pottawatomie County, to be released from custody upon said approval to await trial on this charge of murder, and to abide by the further orders of the District Court of Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma.

POWELL, P. J., and NIX, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1

        CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-44620) pertaining to
the Sierra Tucson Companies, Inc., 1992 Stock Option Plan
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-38608)
pertaining to the Sierra Tucson Companies, Inc., 1990 Stock
Option Plan of our report dated January 29, 1998, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of the Company included in the  Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP               
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Tucson, Arizona
March 27, 1998
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-85327, 333-89489, 333-54924, 333-56068,
333-63422, 333-69812 and 333-97227) and Form S-8 (No. 33-70100, 333-1438,
333-31417, 333-45799, 333-71641, 333-94619, 333-46002, 333-61166, 333-69822 and
333-89590) of Asyst Technologies, Inc. of our report dated April 29, 2003
relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which
appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California

June 30, 2003
# C_2009180EN.01003604.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/36

---

Order of the President of the Court of 26 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Portugal

(Case C-524/08) (1)

1

2009/C 180/65

Language of the case: Portuguese

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 24.1.2009.

1

---
Certificate of Trust of BAC Capital Trust XII



 Exhibit 4.6 
  

CERTIFICATE OF TRUST 
  
 The undersigned, the trustees of BAC Capital Trust XII, desiring to form a statutory trust pursuant to Delaware Statutory Trust Act, 12 Del.
C. § 3810, hereby certify as follows: 
  

	 	(a)	The name of the statutory trust being formed hereby (the “Trust”) is “BAC Capital Trust XII.” 

  

	 	(b)	The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust which has its principal place of business in the State of Delaware is as follows: 

  
 The Bank of New York (Delaware) 
 502 White Clay Center, Route 273 
 Newark,
Delaware 19711 
  

	 	(c)	This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of the date of filing. 

  
 Dated: March 30, 2005 
  

	
	
	 /S/ JAMES T. HOUGHTON

	 Name:   James T. Houghton

	 Title: Regular Trustee

	
	 /S/ KAREN A. GOSNELL

	 Name:   Karen A. Gosnell

	 Title: Regular Trustee



  

			
	 THE BANK OF NEW YORK
 (DELAWARE), as Delaware
Trustee

		
	By:	 	 /s/ KRISTINE K. GULLO

	 Name:
	 	   Kristine K. Gullo

	 Title:
	 	 Assistant Vice President
# Yancey - Appalachian Regional Commission

- High Country Council of Governments Executive Director Julie Wiggins Email  &#x6a;&#119;i&#x67;&#103;i&#x6e;&#x73;&#64;&#x68;&#x63;&#99;o&#x67;&#46;o&#x72;&#x67;The post High Country Council of Governments appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.