alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT        12.4**

 

**1350        CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor        Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Brian C. Irwin, the Chief        Financial Officer of Brazauro Resources Corporation (the “Company”) hereby        certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended January        31, 2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Periodic        Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and the information contained in the        Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the        Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations        of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report

 

 

| Dated: May 29, 2008 | /s/ Brian C. Irwin

Brian C. Irwin

Chief Financial Officer |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|

 

----
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 23, 2009

l1116 

# Order

November 23, 2009

139174

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139174 COA: 283952 Monroe CC: 07-036095-FH CHARLES DION-EDWARDS JOHNICAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 5, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2008247EN.01001502.xml

| 27.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/15

---

Action brought on 17 July 2008 — Communauté d'agglomération du Douaisis v Commission

(Case T-279/08)

(2008/C 247/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Communauté d'agglomération du Douaisis (represented by: M.-Y Benjamin, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities.

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision No C 38/2007 of the Commission of 2 April 2008. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision No C 38/2007 of the Commission of 2 April 2008.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks the annulment of the decision C(2008) 1089 final of the Commission of the European Communities of 2 April 2008 by which the Commission declared incompatible with the common market the State aid granted by the applicant and the Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais in favour of Arbel Fauvet Rail SA in the form of advances repayable at an annual rate of interest of 4,08 % corresponding to the Community reference rate applicable when the loan was granted. The Commission considered that, taking into account its financial standing, Arbel Fauvet Rail SA would not have been able to obtain funds on such favourable terms in the financial market.

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicant are similar to those relied on in Case T-267/08 Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais v Commission.

Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais

Commission

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of GRANT HAYWARD,  INC. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  September  30,  2005 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kevin
Ericksteen,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/ Kevin Ericksteen
                                                  ---------------------------
Date: November 10, 2005                               Kevin Ericksteen
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
H. R. 4641 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to John L. Canley for 

acts of valor during the Vietnam War while a member of the Marine Corps. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF MEDAL OF HONOR TO 

JOHN L. CANLEY FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING THE 

VIETNAM WAR. 

(a) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwithstanding the time 

limitations specified in section 6248 of title 10, United States Code, 

or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain 

medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President 

may award the Medal of Honor under section 6241 of such title 

to John L. Canley for the acts of valor during the Vietnam War 

described in subsection (b). 

(b) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred 

to in subsection (a) are the actions of then Gunnery Sergeant 

John L. Canley during combat operations from January 31, 1968, 

to February 6, 1968, during the Vietnam War as a member of 

the Marine Corps, for which he was previously awarded the Navy 

Cross. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4619 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to provide temporary relief from the annual fee imposed on health insurance providers, 

to the extent that such fee is due to Puerto Rican health insurance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 12, 2017 

Mr. CURBELO of Florida (for himself, Mrs. MURPHY of Florida, and Miss 

GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N of Puerto Rico) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

to provide temporary relief from the annual fee imposed 

on health insurance providers, to the extent that such 

fee is due to Puerto Rican health insurance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4619 IH

1 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY RELIEF FROM ANNUAL FEE ON 

2 HEALTH INSURANCE PROVIDERS IN PUERTO 

3 RICO. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9010 of the Patient Pro5 tection and Affordable Care Act is amended by adding at 

6 the end the following new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(k) TEMPORARY RELIEF FOR PUERTO RICO.—For 

8 calendar years 2018 and 2019, the fee described in sub9 section (a)(1) for a covered entity shall be reduced by the 

10 portion of such fee that such entity demonstrates to the 

11 satisfaction of the Secretary of the Treasury is the portion 

12 attributable to net premiums written for health insurance 

13 regulated by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.’’. 

14 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (1) of 

15 section 9010(b) of the Patient Protection and Affordable 

16 Care Act is amended by striking ‘‘the fee under this sec17 tion’’ and inserting ‘‘the amount determined under this 

18 subsection’’. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2008313EN.01003701.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/37

---

Action brought on 15 September 2008 — Nadine Trautwein Rolf Trautwein v OHIM (Representation of a horse)

(Case T-386/08)

(2008/C 313/67)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Nadine Trautwein Rolf Trautwein GbR, Research Development (Leopoldshohe, Germany) (represented by C. Czychowski, A. Nordemann and A. Dustmann)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 July 2008 in Case R 1730/2007-1 together with the decision of the examiner of 25 September 2007 and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 July 2008 in Case R 1730/2007-1 together with the decision of the examiner of 25 September 2007 and

| — | to authorise the publication of the application for the registration of Community trade mark 4829354; |
| --- | --- |

—

to authorise the publication of the application for the registration of Community trade mark 4829354;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Representation of a horse for goods in Classes 18, 25 and 31 — Application No 4 829 354

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the trade mark applied for is neither directly nor exclusively descriptive, and has a sufficiently distinctive character.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2009032EN.01002301.xml

| 7.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/23

---

Action brought on 9 December 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-547/08)

(2009/C 32/40)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Dejmek and M. Sundén, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2006/70/EC of 1 August 2006 (1) laying down implementing measures for Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the definition of ‘politically exposed person’ and the technical criteria for simplified customer due diligence procedures and for exemption on grounds of a financial activity conducted on an occasional or very limited basis or, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2006/70/EC of 1 August 2006 (1) laying down implementing measures for Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the definition of ‘politically exposed person’ and the technical criteria for simplified customer due diligence procedures and for exemption on grounds of a financial activity conducted on an occasional or very limited basis or, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for implementation of the Directive expired on 15 December 2007.

---

(1)  OJ L 214, p. 29.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reed’s, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher Reed, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:     August 18, 2009




/s/ Christopher Reed


Christopher Reed


Chief executive officer


(Principal Executive Officer)




A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2008236EN.01001302.xml

| 13.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/13

---

Order of the President of the Court of 6 June 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-31/08) (1)

1

(2008/C 236/22)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 29.3.2008.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 244 (Thursday, December 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 88405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28019]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Dementia Caregiver Support Intervention.
    Date: January 22, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Sandhya Sanghi, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 2N230, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 496-2879, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a6d5c7c8c2cedfc788d5c7c8c1cecfe6c8cfce88c1c9d0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="394a58575d514058174a58575e515079575051175e564f">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 15, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-28019 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2008107EN.01003902.xml

| 26.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/39

---

Action brought on 27 February 2008 — CPEM v Commission

(Case T-106/08)

(2008/C 107/67)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Centre de promotion de l'emploi par la micro-entreprise (CPEM) (Marseille, France) (represented by: C. Bonnefoi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annulment of the debit note; |
| --- | --- |

—

annulment of the debit note;

| — | recognise a right to damages for public detriment to the reputation of a body acting in the context of a task of general interest (estimated at EUR 100 000); |
| --- | --- |

—

recognise a right to damages for public detriment to the reputation of a body acting in the context of a task of general interest (estimated at EUR 100 000);

| — | repayment of lawyers' fees and the costs of legal assistance made necessary, proof of which can be provided. |
| --- | --- |

—

repayment of lawyers' fees and the costs of legal assistance made necessary, proof of which can be provided.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By this action, the applicant seeks annulment of the Commission decision contained in debit note No 3240912189 of 17 December 2007 relating to Commission Decision C(2007) 4645 of 4 October 2007, cancelling, following an OLAF report, the assistance granted by the European Social Fund to finance, by way of a global subsidy, a pilot project carried out by the applicant (1) the annulment of which is sought by the applicant in Case T-444/07 CPME v Commission
   (2).

1

CPME

Commission

2

In support of its application, the applicant submits, principally, that the Commission has erred in law and exceeded its powers in so far as the contested debit note was not addressed to the actual debtor. By relying on infringement of Article 135 of the Financial Regulation No 1605/2002 (3), it submits that the debit note should have been addressed to the body which played a financially responsible role in the project concerned, which actually received the grant from the European Social Fund.

3

Moreover, the applicant submits that the fact that the debit note was addressed to it damages its image and its credibility with respect to its financial partners given the general interest task it performs.

---

(1)  Commission Decision C(1999) 2645 of 17 August 1999, amended by Decision No C(2001) 2144 of 18 September 2001.

1

(2)  OJ 2008 C 37, p. 29.

2

(3)  Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ 2002 L 248, p. 1).

3

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6160

REGINALD LEE ROGERS, SR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

FRANK L. PERRY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00738-JAB-LPA)

Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015

Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Lee Rogers, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, 

III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Lee Rogers, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Rogers has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny

his motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          33,307
<SECURITIES>                                     8,334
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,394
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,842
<PP&E>                                           8,693
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,653
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,467
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,784
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,485
<CGS>                                           35,215
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,939
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (776)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,083
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,858
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,225
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,225
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23


</TABLE>