alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Bartow - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Northwest Georgia Regional Commission Executive Director Boyd Austin Email &#98;&#x61;&#117;&#x73;&#116;&#x69;&#110;&#x40;n&#x77;g&#x72;c&#x2e;o&#114;&#x67;The post Northwest Georgia Regional Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6601

MOSES KING, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

JOHN DOES, various DEA Agents; JOHN DOES, various US Marshal 

Service Agents, 

 Defendants – Appellees, 

 and 

JOHN DOE, Deputy; DEA AGENTS; DRUG ENFORCEMENT 

ADMINISTRATION; UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, 

 Defendants. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(6:07-cv-04155-DCN) 

Submitted: July 20, 2009 Decided: August 19, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. 

 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Moses King, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Moses King appeals the district court’s orders: (1) 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown 

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971); 

and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. 

John Does, No. 6:07-cv-04155-DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 4 & Feb. 19, 

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
# Preston - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Trail Systems: Guiding Communities to Opportunities Every&#160;Appalachian state&#160;has ample trail opportunities, from the&#160;Tanglefoot&#160;Trail in Mississippi, to&#160;South Carolina’s&#160;Swamp&#160;Rabbit Trail&#160;and&#160;the Great Allegheny Passage in Maryland and Pennsylvania.&#160;Trails are incredible gateways for attracting outside visitors and increasing quality of life for community members. ARC partners have long worked to establish trail systems that are unique to their community, while others are finding creative&#160;ways to&#160;involve communities in trail maintenance, creating an [&#8230;]The post Trail Systems: Guiding Communities to Opportunities appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Region 6–Planning and Development Council Executive Director Sheena Hunt Email r&#101;&#x67;&#x69;o&#110;&#x76;&#x69;&#64;&#114;&#x65;&#x67;i&#111;&#x6e;&#x76;i&#46;&#x63;&#x6f;mThe post Region 6–Planning and Development Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2010037EN.01003601.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2009 — Giordano Enterprises v OHIM — Dias Magalhães & Filhos (GIORDANO)

(Case T-483/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark GIORDANO - Earlier national word mark GIORDANO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Partial refusal of registration - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 37/48

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Giordano Enterprises Ltd (F.T. Labuan, Malaysia) (represented by: M. Nentwig, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Montguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: José Dias Magalhães & Filhos Lda (Arrifana Vfr, Portugal) (represented by: J.M. João, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

da

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 July 2008 (Case R 1864/2007-2) relating to opposition proceedings between José Dias Magalhães & Filhos Lda and Giordano Enterprises Ltd.

da

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Giordano Enterprises Ltd. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Giordano Enterprises Ltd. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 24.1.2009.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 29, 2010 

d0322 

Order 

 

March 29, 2010 

139873(46) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139873 

 COA: 285439 

Kent CC: 07-006937-FH 

KEVIN MICHAEL FLEXMAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s January 29, 

2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of  FORESIGHT SPECIALISTS, INC.,
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Kevin Ericksteen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Kevin
      Ericksteen


Kevin
      Ericksteen


Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




Date: October
      10, 2007
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6270

JOHN RICKIE CRITE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN B. HATFIELD, JR.; STEVE COLE; RICK J. MCCURRY; W. P. RIGGS, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CA-96-818-2) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 6, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Rickie Crite, Appellant Pro Se. John B. Hatfield, Jr., HATFIELD & HATFIELD, Greensboro, North Carolina; Debra C. Graves, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina;Susan D. Moore, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying him relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985, 1986 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court, deny Appellant’s motion to appoint counsel, and deny Appellant’s motion to stay the case. Crite v. Hatfield , No. CA-96-818-2 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Chenango - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Southern Tier 8 Regional Board Executive Director Jennifer Gregory Email con&#116;&#97;&#99;&#116;&#x40;&#x73;&#x6f;&#x75;&#x74;&#x68;&#x65;rnt&#105;&#101;&#114;&#56;&#46;&#x6f;&#x72;&#x67;The post Southern Tier 8 Regional Board appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 249 (Friday, December 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 90220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28742]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 29, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 26, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 157 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-142, CP2024-148.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-28742 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reed's Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Christopher J.
Reed, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Christopher J. Reed
----------------------------------
Christopher J. Reed,
Chief Executive Officer, President
And Chief Financial Officer
June 30, 2005
Filed 2/17/ 21 P. v. Lopez CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

FELIX LOPEZ,

Defendant and Appellant. F080558

(Super. Ct. No. M19926494)



### OPINION

THE COURT *
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Michael G.
Idiart, Judge.
John L. Staley, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant.
Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and
Respondent.

- ooOoo

-

* Before Hill, P.J., Poochigian, J. and DeSantos, J.2

.

Appointed counsel for defendant Felix Lopez asked this court to review the record
to determine whether there are any arguable is sues on appeal. ( People v. Wende (1979)
25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief within

30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. Defendant responded, contending
(1) his indecent exposure should be resent enced as a misdemeanor without a sex offender
registration requirement, (2) he had the right to express his religious beliefs, and (3) at
most, he violated a city ordinance by “parading in the nude without a permit.” Finding
no arguable error that would r esult in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we

affirm.

BACKGROUND
On August 10, 2019, an employee of a discount store saw defendant standing
outside naked and looking at her. He did not move until he saw her pull out her phone to

call the police. When officers arrived, defendant said he was not naked and was only
walking back and forth in the area.
On November 27, 2019, defendant pled no contest to felony indecent exposure
(Pen. Code, § 314, subd. 1; 1 count 1) and admitted having suffere d a prior conviction

under the same statute. The trial court dismissed count 2 and indicated a 16

- month

sentence lid.
On December 30, 2019, the trial court sentenced defendant to 16 months in prison,
awarded credits, and imposed various fines and fees. The court ordered him to register as
a sex offender pursuant to section 290.
On December 31, 2019, defendant filed a notice of appeal.
After reviewing the record, we find no arguable error on appeal that would result
in a disposition more favorable to de fendant.

1 All statutory references are to the Penal Code.3

. DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
# C_2009055EN.01000701.xml

| 7.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/7

---

Appeal brought on 27 November 2008 by HUP Uslugi Polska sp. z o.o. (formerly HP Temporärpersonalgesellschaft mbH) against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 24 September 2008 in Case T-248/05 HUP Uslugi Polska sp. z o.o. (formerly HP Temporärpersonalgesellschaft mbH) v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Manpower, Inc.

(Case C-520/08 P)

(2009/C 55/10)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: HUP Uslugi Polska sp. z o.o. (formerly HP Temporärpersonalgesellschaft mbH) (represented by: M. Ciresa, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Manpower, Inc.

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the judgment under appeal |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the judgment under appeal

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant submits that the judgment of the Court of First Instance infringes Articles 51(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c), 7(1)(d) and 7(1)(g) of Council Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trademark.

---
================================================================================

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tari Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the  period  ended June 30,  2004 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15
         (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and results of  operations
         of the Company.



Date:  July 29, 2004


                                                /s/  Theodore Tsagkaris
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Theodore Tsagkaris
                                                Secretary, Treasurer & C.F.O.
                                                (Principal Financial Officer and
                                                Principal Accounting Officer)
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 18-05

TO: Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants

Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics

Veterinary Services Leadership Team

FROM: Byron Rippke

Director

SUBJECT: Detection of Senecavirus A in Veterinary Biological Products

I. PURPOSE

The purpose of this notice is to inform interested parties that the Center for 

Veterinary Biologics (CVB) is aware that certain veterinary biological products 

may contain a contaminating virus not easily detected by current routine test 

methods and to describe actions to address this issue.

II. BACKGROUND

Senecavirus A (SVA) is a single-stranded RNA virus belonging to the family 

Picornaviridae that causes blister-like lesions on the mouth, snout, and hooves in 

susceptible swine. These lesions are clinically indistinguishable from lesions 

caused by exotic agents including foot-and-mouth disease, swine vesicular disease, 

vesicular stomatitis, and swine vesicular exanthema. This virus was uncommon in 

the U.S. prior to 2015, but has become more prevalent since that time. SVA has 

been found as a contaminant in porcine trypsin and serum.

Under the authority of the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act and title 9, Code of Federal 

Regulations (9 CFR), the CVB requires that all veterinary biological products be 

tested for purity. The tests described in 9 CFR 113.53 (Requirements for 

ingredients of animal origin used for production of biologics) are not able to detect 

the presence of SVA.

III. ACTION (or POLICY)

The CVB is issuing this notice to ensure that veterinary biological product 

manufacturers who use ingredients of animal origin derived from swine in their 

production processes are aware of this issue and can prevent the use of material that 

does not meet acceptable standards for purity and quality in the manufacturing 

process.

Animal and Plant

Health Inspection

Service

Veterinary Services

Center for Veterinary 

Biologics

1920 Dayton Avenue

PO Box 844

Ames, IA 50010

(515) 337-6100
CENTER FOR VETERINARY BIOLOGICS NOTICE NO. 18-05

Page 2

 An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Results of of all testing for extraneous agents conducted on ingredients of animal origin, 

including tests required by 9 CFR 113.53 shall be recorded by the testing laboratory and 

made a part of the licensee’s records. If requested, these data would be made available to 

the CVB for review.

To address the issue the CVB has developed assays for the detection of SVA nucleic acid 

as well as for the detection of viable SVA. These protocols are available on the CVB

website.

IV. IMPLEMENTATION/ APPLICABILITY

The CVB is now testing all Master Seeds and Master Cell Stocks that have been 

produced using ingredients derived from swine for the presence of SVA.
|   | 1. | The      Annual Report of SQM on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,      2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents,      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of SQM. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Ricardo Ramos      R.                                                                          |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  Ricardo      Ramos R.                                                             |
| Title:  Chief      Financial Officer and Business Development Senior Vice      President |
| Date: June 30,2009                                                                                 |

----