alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2009 – Commission v Greece**

**(Case C‐298/08)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2006/22/EC – Approximation of laws – Social legislation relating to road transport activities – Failure to transpose within the prescribed period

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 7)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on minimum conditions for the implementation of Council Regulations (EEC) No 3820/85 and (EEC) No 3821/85 concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities and repealing Council Directive 88/599/EEC (OJ 2006 L 102, p. 35). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on minimum conditions for the implementation of Council Regulations (EEC) No 3820/85 and (EEC) No 3821/85 concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities and repealing Council Directive 88/599/EEC, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2006/22. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
# Talladega - Appalachian Regional Commission

- East Alabama Regional Planning and Development Commission Executive Director Lori Hodge Sokol Email &#x6c;&#x6f;&#x72;&#x69;&#x2e;&#x73;&#x6f;&#107;&#111;&#108;&#64;&#101;arpd&#x63;&#x2e;&#x6f;&#x72;&#x67;The post East Alabama Regional Planning and Development Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-12-0242

SAT Date: 3/30/2012

Print Date: 8/2/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 1 Health: PMN ; Eco: intact material

2 3 Health: Eco: high concern for toxicity of incomplete incinerat

products to terrestrial organisms

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 1 1 PMN

3 2 2 Incin Pdt

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Inhalation Drinking water and inhalaiton for 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ; PMN negl; Incin Pdt rapid

Keywords:

 Keywords: PMN: LUNG OVERLOAD

 LIVER; BLOOD; MALE REPRO; IMMUNOTOX; ONCO; AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-12-0241-42

FATE: 

S = Negl.

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)
POTW removal (%) = PMN 90 via sorption; Incin Pdt 0

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = PMN >mo; Incin Pdt >mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = PMN v.strong; Incin Pdt low

PBT Potential: PMN P3B1; Incin Pdt P3B2

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = PMN negl; Incin Pdt rapid

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes (pchem). Concern for lung 

toxicity if inhaled based on lung overload for high molecular weight polymers. For the potential 

incomplete incineration product, based on test data for the analogue 

concerns are liver toxicity, blood toxicity, and male reproductive toxicity [rat 28-day oral 

NOAEL = 50 mg/kg, LOAEL = 150 mg/kg with liver toxicity; rat 90-day oral LOAEL = 10 

mg/kg based on decreased body weight in males at all doses and liver toxicity and anemia at 200 

mg/kg; there were toxic effects on the testes in 2 males in the 90-day oral study that were judged 

by the reviewer to be indicative of the potential for male reproductive toxicity. There is also 

concern for immunosuppression and oncogenicity based on data for .

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SAR 

chemical class = polymer-

 S < 0.001 mg/L at 20 C(P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 

100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; 

and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*

SARs nonionic polymers

SAR Class polymer-nonionic-
Ecotox Category Nonionic Polymers

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
**Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2009 – Commission v Provincia di Imperia**

**(Case C‐183/08 P)**

Appeal – Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure – Conditions governing the admissibility of an action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Call for proposals regarding the financing of innovative actions under the European Social Fund – Decision to reject – Benefit for the applicant arising from a possible annulment of the contested act

Actions for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Commission decision refusing European Social Fund support to an innovative measure under Article 6 of Regulation No 1784/1999
– Not possible to comply with the judgment annulling the measure – No effect (Art. 230, fourth para., EC; European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1784/1999, Art. 6) (see paras 19, 26,
30)

**Re:**

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 14 February 2008 in Case T-351/05 | Provincia di Imperia | v | Commission | , by which that Court declared admissible (but unfounded) the action brought by the appellant for the annulment of the Commission’s decision of 30 June 2005 to refuse to grant it a subsidy in the context of a call for proposals concerning innovative measures under the European Social Fund – Infringement of the conditions governing the admissibility of an action for annulment – Meaning of an ‘interest in bringing proceedings’ – No benefit for the applicant arising from a possible annulment of the contested act. |

**Operative part:**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The appeal is dismissed as manifestly unfounded. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | The Commission of the European Communities shall bear its own costs. |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shirley Walker, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Browne, J.), rendered August 21, 1989, convicting her of robbery in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*148Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that the People did adduce legally sufficient evidence that the complainant sustained physical injury *(see,*Penal Law § 10.00 [9]), a necessary element of the charge of robbery in the second degree under Penal Law § 160.10 (2) (a). Indeed, in addition to the subjective testimony that the then 79-year-old complainant was "dropped” to the ground by the defendant causing her to sustain "a lot of pain” in her shoulder, back, and legs, the evidence was uncontroverted that prior to being mugged by the defendant, the complainant had no difficulty walking, whereas subsequent thereto, she was no longer able to walk without difficulty and received continuing medical treatment. Accordingly, physical injury was established by the legally sufficient evidence adduced that as a result of being mugged by the defendant, the complainant had sustained an impairment of her physical condition *(see,*Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; *see also, People v McAdoo,*166 AD2d 674; *People v Harper,*145 AD2d 933; *People v Weatherly,*144 AD2d 509; *People v Talibon,*138 AD2d 426). Bracken, J. P., Eiber, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
# C_2008051EN.01005902.xml

| 23.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/59

---

Action brought on 31 December 2007 — IIC-Intersport International Corporation v OHIM — McKenzie Corporation (McKENZIE)

(Case T-502/07)

(2008/C 51/108)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: IIC-Intersport International Corporation GmbH (Ostermundigen, Switzerland) (represented by: P.J.M. Steinhauser, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The McKenzie Corporation Ltd (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the appealed decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 15 October 2007 in Case R 1425/2006-2 and confirm the decision of the Opposition Division of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 6 September 2006 by which the opposition of Intersport has been received in respect of certain of the goods concerned. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the appealed decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 15 October 2007 in Case R 1425/2006-2 and confirm the decision of the Opposition Division of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 6 September 2006 by which the opposition of Intersport has been received in respect of certain of the goods concerned.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The McKenzie Corporation Ltd

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The Community figurative mark ‘McKENZIE’ for goods and services in Classes 18, 25, 36 and 37

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: IIC-Intersport International Corporation GmbH

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The earlier Community figurative mark ‘MCKINLEY’ for goods and services in Classes 18, 20, 22, 25 and 28 and the earlier Community word mark ‘MCKINLEY’ for goods and services in Classes 12, 18, 20, 22, 25 and 28.

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition partially

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Rejected the opposition in its entirety and allowed registration to proceed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94.

Pleas in law:

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5860]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. SARBANES:
        H.R. 6376.
        Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution.
```
Exhibit 23.2   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-75247, 333-21845 and 333-06083) of Castelle of our report dated March 29, 2004, except for the restatement described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (not presented herein), as to which the date is April 13, 2005, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.   /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP San Jose, California March 23, 2006    E-26
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2003, dated the date of this Certification (the Report), I, Craig F. Fortin, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 16, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Craig F. Fortin                                              
|                     |  |  |  |                                                                  
|                     |  |  |  | Craig F. Fortin Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



73
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re John Anthony Buchanan

Appellate case number: 01-20-00128-CR

Date Motion Filed: July 7, 2020

Party Filing Motion: Relator, John Anthony Buchanan

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is denied. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 41.2(c), 49.7.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Sherry Radack____

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, 

Goodman, Landau, Hightower, Countiss, and Adams.

Date: __August 18, 2020____
# Perry - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Rural Action: Moving Forest Communities Forward in Ohio Rural Action is using ARC support, and a partnership with the U.S. Forest Service, to help coal-impacted communities boost trails and tourism.The post Rural Action: Moving Forest Communities Forward in Ohio appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Buckeye Hills Regional Council Executive Director Chasity Schmelzenbach Email cshm&#101;&#108;&#122;&#101;&#110;&#98;&#97;&#x63;&#x68;&#x40;&#x62;&#x75;&#x63;&#x6b;&#x65;&#x79;ehil&#108;&#115;&#46;&#111;&#114;&#103;The post Buckeye Hills Regional Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Polar Molecular Holding Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Mark L. Nelson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Mark L. NelsonMark L. Nelson President and Chief Executive
Officer  April 29,
2004




This Certification is made
solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This written statement shall not be deemed to be filed as part of the annual report on Form 10-K that it accompanies.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

I, J. William Holden, III, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 of MirantAmericas Generation, LLC;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.                 Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.                Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.                 Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the registrant’s board of managers (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a.                 All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b.                Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: November 9, 2005 |
|-----------------------------|
| By:                         | /s/ J. WILLIAM HOLDEN, III |   |
| * *                    | *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

62

----
EXHIBIT 23
[U-P-D-A-T-E]

ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Buckhead America Corporation:

We consent to incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statements (Nos.
333-05313 and 333-37691) on Form S-3 and in the  Registration  Statements  (Nos.
333-97046,  333-33097,333-58375  and 333-80865) on Form S-8 of Buckhead  America
Corporation  of our report  dated March 3, 2000,  relating  to the  consolidated
balance sheets of Buckhead  America  Corporation and subsidiaries as of December
31,  1999  and  1998,  and  the  related  consolidated   statements  of  income,
shareholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the years then
ended,  which  report  appears in the  December  31, 1999 annual  report on Form
10-KSB of Buckhead America Corporation.

                                                   /s/ KPMG LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 30, 2000
Return to Main Site

|  |
|--|

HomeSource and Methodology: Unemployment Rates

Print this pageEmail this page

| SOURCE & METHODOLOGYUnemployment Rates
**Civilian Labor Force:** Total number of persons (non-institutionalized or not on active duty in the Armed Forces) who are 16 years of age or older and either employed or unemployed.

**Persons Employed:** Total number of employed persons in the civilian labor force. 

**Persons Unemployed:** Total number of unemployed persons in the civilian labor force. 

**Unemployment Rate:** The number of unemployed persons as a percentage of the civilian labor force. 

**Unemployment Rate, Percent of U.S. Average:**This value is computed by dividing the unemployment rate of a county, state, or region by the national average. 

**Three–Year Average Unemployment Rate:** The three–year average unemployment rate is a measure of long–term structural unemployment. The unemployment rate is calculated by dividing the three–year sum of persons unemployed by the three–year sum of the civilian labor force and expressing the result as a percentage. 

**Three–Year Average Unemployment Rate, Percent of U.S. Average:** This value is computed by dividing the three–year average unemployment rate of a county, state, or region by the national three–year average and expressing the result as a percentage. 

*Source:*U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics. 

Compiled by the Appalachian Regional Commission. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Site MapContact ARCWeb and Privacy PolicyUSA.govOffice of  Inspector General
# Henderson - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Creating PPE for Nurses and School Officials in Western North Carolina STEMwork in western North Carolina (WNCSTEMwork) is a teacher professional development initiative of the Kenan Institute for Engineering, Technology, and Science at North Carolina State University. With ARC support, this program supports six middle and high school teachers from ten counties as they develop their capacity to lead and sustain STEM workforce education. In April [&#8230;]The post Creating PPE for Nurses and School Officials in Western North Carolina appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Land-of-Sky Regional Council Executive Director Nathan Ramsey Email &#160;&#105;&#x6e;&#102;&#x6f;&#64;&#x6c;&#97;&#x6e;&#100;&#x6f;&#102;&#x73;&#107;&#x79;&#46;&#x6f;&#114;&#x67;The post Land-of-Sky Regional Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.