alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment to Employment Agreement - Randall Reynoso & Placer Sierra Bank



 EXHIBIT 10.20 
  
 AMENDMENT TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This Amendment to
Employment Agreement (“Amendment”), dated as of June 1, 2004 (“Effective Date”), is entered into by and among PLACER SIERRA BANK, a California banking corporation (“Bank”) and RANDALL REYNOSO (“Employee”).

  
 A. Bank and Employee are parties to that certain Employment
Agreement, dated October 28, 2003 “Agreement”). 
  
 B.
Bank and Employee desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 
  
 Now, therefore, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 
  
 AMENDMENT 
  
 1.
Health, Life and Disability Insurance. Section 4(e) of the Agreement is amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
  
 (e) Health, Life and Disability Insurance. Bank shall provide for Employee’s participation in group medical, dental,
vision, life and disability insurance benefits available under the group insurance programs maintained by Bank for its employees. The amount paid by Bank for such group medical, dental, vision, life and disability insurance for Employee shall be an
amount equal to that portion paid by Bank for each of its employees in accordance with its usual and customary practices. Employee shall have the right, in Employee’s discretion, to designate the beneficiary or beneficiaries of any such
insurance. Bank reserves the right to modify and amend such benefits from time to time. As provided under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (“COBRA”) respecting continuation of any insurance coverage, Employee
shall, upon a loss of any such coverage for himself under Bank’s health, dental and/or vision plans (if any) resulting from (1) termination of Employee’s employment (for any reason other than for gross misconduct) or (2) a reduction in his
hours, be entitled to exercise her COBRA rights. Employee shall pay all premiums for any such continuation coverage(s) elected by Employee. 
  
 2. Affirmation. In order to induce each other to enter into this Amendment, the parties hereby confirm that all terms and provisions of the
Agreement have been and continue to be in all respects in full force and effect, and no violation of the terms and conditions of the Agreement has occurred. 
  
 3. Amendment. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, this Amendment shall not alter, amend, or otherwise modify the terms and
provisions of the Agreement. From and after the Effective Date, all references in the Agreement to “the Agreement,” “this Agreement” or any similar reference shall refer to the Agreement as amended by this Amendment. Capitalized
words or terms used in this Amendment are defined words or terms, the definitions of which are set forth in the Agreement unless otherwise defined in this Amendment. 
  

 -1- 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date. 
  

					
	“Bank”	 	“EMPLOYEE”
		
	PLACER SIERRA BANK	 	 /s/ Randall Reynoso


	  
 By:
	 	  
 /s/ Ken Johnson

	 	RANDALL REYNOSO
	 	 	 Executive Vice President and
 Human Resources
Director
	 	 

  

 -2-
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 108 (Wednesday, July 18, 2012)]
[House]
[Pages H4915-H4916]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              THE JOURNAL

  The SPEAKER. The Chair has examined the Journal of the last day's 
proceedings and announces to the House his approval thereof.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal stands approved.

[[Page H4916]]

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit
      10.2**





**SECOND
      AMENDMENT TO SUBLEASE AGREEMENT**


7000
      Shoreline Court, South San Francisco, California





THIS
      SECOND AMENDMENT TO SUBLEASE AGREEMENT (“Amendment”), is made and entered into
      effective this 19 th day of
      May 2008, by and between MJ RESEARCH COMPANY, INC. (“Sublessor”) and HANA
      BIOSCIENCES, INC. (“Sublessee”).





**RECITALS**





**A.**  Sublessor
      and Sublessee are parties to a Sublease and a First Amendment to Sublease
      Agreement, each dated May 31, 2006 (collectively, the “Original
      Sublease”).





**B.**  Sublessor
      and Sublessee desire to amend and modify the term of the Original Sublease,
      as
      set forth in this Amendment. The Original Sublease, as modified by this
      Amendment, is referred to collectively as the “Sublease.”





**AGREEMENT**





**1.**  **Confirmation
      of Termination Date.** The
      provisions of *Section
      2* of the
      First Amendment to Sublease are modified as follows: (i) Sublessee shall have
      until May 31, 2009 to exercise its one-time right to confirm the Termination
      Date, (ii) in the event that Sublessee exercises its right to confirm the
      Termination Date, as provided in the preceding item “(i),” the term of this
      Sublease shall expire on May 31, 2010, and (iii) in the event that Sublessee
      does not exercise its right to confirm the Termination Date, as provided in
      the
      preceding item “(i),” the term of this Sublease shall expire on March 31, 2011.





**2.**  **Correction.** Wherever
      the name “MJ Research Company, Inc.” appears in the Sublease or any amendment
      thereto, the name “MJ Research, Incorporated” shall be substituted therefor.




**3.**  **Ratification.** Except
      as modified by the provisions of this Amendment, the terms and conditions of
      the
      Original Sublease shall continue to apply. In the event of a conflict between
      the provisions of this Amendment and the Original Sublease, the provisions
      of
      this Amendment shall prevail.




**4.**  **Counterparts.** This
      Amendment may each be executed in counterpart copies, each of which shall be
      deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same
      instrument. Electronic copies of signatures to this Amendment shall be deemed
      to
      constitute original signatures.




THIS
      AMENDMENT is executed by the parties and effective as of the date first set
      forth above.


**SUBLESSOR:**
              **SUBLESSEE:**MJ
                  RESEARCH, INCORPORATED.
              HANA
                  BIOSCIENCES, INC.By:
              /s/
                  Sandford S. Wadler
              By:
              /s/
                  John P. IparraguirreName:
                  Sandford S. Wadler
              Name:
              John
                  P. IparraguirreIts:
                  Vice President
              
              Its:
                  VP, Chief Financial
                  Officer
# Tompkins - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Southern Tier 8 Regional Board Executive Director Jennifer Gregory Email c&#111;&#110;&#x74;&#x61;c&#116;&#64;&#x73;&#x6f;&#x75;t&#104;&#101;&#x72;&#x6e;ti&#101;&#x72;&#x38;&#x2e;o&#114;&#103;The post Southern Tier 8 Regional Board appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
J.
J.
J. suffer prejudice from the delay. 

### Hart v. State, 116 Nev. 558, 563-64, 1 P.3d 969, 972 (2000). Therefore, the district court did not err in denying appellant's motion. 3 Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 4


### Aed-A Hardesty 

# pc Parraguirre
cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge Eddie Bell Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk ...continued 2007); 

### Bell v. State, Docket No. 59158 (Order of Affirmance, March 7, 2012). 3 We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel.

4 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 451 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the estate tax 

and retain stepped-up basis at death. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2017 

Mr. LATTA (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. 

GOSAR, Mr. JODY B. HICE of Georgia, Mr. JONES, Mr. LONG, Mr. 

MESSER, and Mr. POE of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the estate tax and retain stepped-up basis at death. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanently Repeal 

5 the Estate Tax Act of 2017’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 451 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ESTATE TAX AND RETENTION OF BASIS 

2 STEP-UP. 

3 Effective for estates of decedents dying after Decem4 ber 31, 2016, chapter 11 of the Internal Revenue Code 

5 of 1986 is repealed. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Pulaski - Appalachian Regional Commission

- New River Valley Planning District Commission Executive Director Kevin Byrd Email &#x6e;r&#x76;&#112;&#x64;&#99;&#x40;&#x6e;r&#x76;&#112;&#x64;&#99;&#x2e;&#111;r&#x67;The post New River Valley Planning District Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2010063EN.01001902.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/19

---

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 January 2010 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Charlottenburg — Germany) — Amiraike Berlin GmbH

(Case C-497/08) (1)

1

(Non-contentious proceedings - Appointment of the liquidator of a company - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

2010/C 63/29

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Charlottenburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Amiraike Berlin GmbH

Applicant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Amtsgericht Charlottenburg — Interpretation of Arts 10, 43 and 48 of the EC Treaty — Recognition by a Member State of an expropriatory measure concerning assets situated in its territory, ordered by the legal system of another Member State — Removal of a limited liability company under United Kingdom law from the register at Companies House for failure to fulfil publicity obligations, resulting in the forfeiture of its assets, including real estate situated in Germany, to the United Kingdom crown.

Operative part

Operative part

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to rule on the question referred by the Amtsgericht Charlottenburg in its decision of 7 November 2008.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 16.5.2009.

1

---
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steve S.
Sinohui, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify that:

1.    
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SIN Holdings, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue  statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make  the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements  were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly  report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information  included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the  financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as  of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report;

4.     I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and  procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the  registrant and have:

a)     designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material  information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the  period in which this report is being
prepared;

b)     evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and  presented in this
report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the  disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this  report based on such evaluation; and

c)     disclosed
in this report any change in the registrants internal control  over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent  fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to  materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial  reporting.

5.     I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over  financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the board of  directors:

a)     all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or  operation of internal
control over financial reporting that are reasonably  likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process,  summarize and report financial
information; and

b)     any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other  employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control  over financial reporting.

| | /s/
Steve S. SinohuiSteve S. Sinohui, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial
Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 7, 2007
# Staff Profiles - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Federal Co-Chair Gayle Conelly Manchin Gayle Conelly Manchin is ARC's Federal Co-Chair. The post Federal Co-Chair Gayle Conelly Manchin appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Executive Director Brandon McBride Brandon McBride joined ARC as the Executive Director in November 2020.The post Executive Director Brandon McBride appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Guy Land Congressional Liaison Specialist.The post Guy Land appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Missy Phalen The post Missy Phalen appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Jill Wilmoth Special Assistant.The post Jill Wilmoth appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Sarah Baron Budget Analyst.The post Sarah Baron appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Sydney Parker The post Sydney Parker appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- James Hyland States’ Washington Representative.The post James Hyland appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Fran Thomas Business Operations Manager.The post Fran Thomas appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Philip Heneghan Inspector General.The post Philip Heneghan appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Exhibit 12.2
 COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 For the Years Ended December 31,(dollar in thousands)
    
    2009
    
    2008
    
    2007
    
    2006
    
    2005Earnings:Pre-tax (loss) income from continuing operations before adjustment
for income or loss from equity investees$
    (1,690
    )
    
    $
    (95,254
    )
    
    $
    (64,836
    )
    
    $
    (12,071
    )
    
    $
    (38,405
    )Amortization of interest capitalized
    
    
    3,780
    
    
    
    3,100
    
    
    
    3,392
    
    
    
    3,252
    
    
    
    2,709Interest capitalized
    
    
    (3,870
    )
    
    
    (25,032
    )
    
    
    (27,105
    )
    
    
    (17,063
    )
    
    
    (9,586
    )Distributed income of equity investees
    
    
    11,601
    
    
    
    13,344
    
    
    
    13,207
    
    
    
    9,370
    
    
    
    3,942Fixed charges
    
    
    95,856
    
    
    
    100,002
    
    
    
    122,996
    
    
    
    151,426
    
    
    
    147,778Total earnings
    
    $
    105,677
    
    
    $
    (3,840
    )
    
    $
    47,654
    
    
    $
    134,914
    
    
    $
    106,438Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    
    87,023
    
    
    
    69,951
    
    
    
    89,105
    
    
    
    127,779
    
    
    
    132,493Capitalized interest
    
    
    3,870
    
    
    
    25,032
    
    
    
    27,105
    
    
    
    17,063
    
    
    
    9,586Debt costs amortization
    
    
    4,963
    
    
    
    5,019
    
    
    
    6,786
    
    
    
    6,584
    
    
    
    5,699Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    95,856
    
    
    $
    100,002
    
    
    $
    122,996
    
    
    $
    151,426
    
    
    $
    147,778Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    1.1
    
    
    
    (a
    )
    
    
    (a
    )
    
    
    (a
    )
    
    
    (a
    )
 
 a)
    
    For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the aggregate amount of
fixed charges exceeded our earnings by approximately $103.8 million, $75.3 million,
$16.5 million and $41.3 million, respectively, which is the amount of additional
earnings that would have been required to achieve a ratio of earnings to fixed charges
of 1.0x for such period. The deficiency of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges for
all years 2005  2009 is impacted by the classification of operations for assets held
for sale and sold as discontinued operations. The deficiency of the ratio of earnings
to fixed charges for the year ended December 31, 2008 is also due to the $116.9 million
non-cash impairment charge related to CRLPs for-sale residential business and certain
development projects.The deficiency of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the
year ended December 31, 2007 is also due to the $43.3 million non-cash impairment
charge related to the Trusts for-sale residential business.The deficiency of the
ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the year ended December 31, 2005, is also impacted by amortization of intangible assets acquired in the merger
with Cornerstone Realty Income Trust.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unify Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Todd E. Wille, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

|   |           (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and                              |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|   |           (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the   Registrant. |

| Dated: December 13, 2006 | /s/ TODD E. WILLE       |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|
|                     |                         |
|                     | Todd E. Wille           |
|                     | Chief Executive Officer |

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Numbers 33-72656 and 33-74616) and on Form S-3
(File Number 333-49577) of Aetrium Incorporated of our report dated January 29,
1999, appearing on page 13 of the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to
incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule,
which appears on page 20 of this Form 10-K.


/S/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 24, 1999
Exhibit 32.1

I, Craig H. Barratt, the chief executive officer of Atheros Communications, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of
chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,:



|(i) | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 19, 2010



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Craig H. Barratt                 
|Craig H. Barratt                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
NO. 07-06-0009-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL C MAY 4, 2006

______________________________

WILLIAM RIVAS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 222 ND DISTRIC T COURT O F DEAF SMIT H COUNTY; NO. CR-04I-129; HON. ROLAND SAUL, PRESIDING

_______________________________ Memorandum Opinion

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS an d HANCOCK, JJ. Appellant, William Rivas, appeal s from the tr i al court’s adjudication of hi s guilt for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon by contending that his trial counse l w as ineffective. Counsel was purportedly ineffective because he did not obtain tw o expert wi tnesses. The experts could have bee n used, he continu es, at the heari ng upon the State’s motion to adjudi cate guilt to show tha t he did not co mmit th e cri me resulting in the decision to adjudicate. For the reaso n stated below, we dismiss the appeal.2

No appeal may be taken from the trial court’s deci sion to adjudi cate guilt . T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . A NN . art. 42.12 §5(b) (Vernon Supp. 200 5); Hogans v. State, 176 S.W.3d 829, 832 (Tex. Cr im. App. 2005) ( involv ing a clai m of ineffective assi stance). Gi ven this r ule, a defendant may not ass ert, on direc t appeal, tha t his a ttor ney de nied him t he ef fec tive assistance of counsel durin g the proceedi ng to adjudicate. Hogans v. State, 176 S.W.3d at833. Here, appe llan t ass erts that his at torn ey sho uld h ave ac quire d two e xpert s to p rove thathe did not co mmi t the crime upon which t he trial cour t founded its decis ion to adjudicate appellant’s g uilt. As posited, trial counsel’ s supposed ineffectivenessis offered as a way to attack the dec ision to adjud icate. And, because it is, we hav e no jurisdi ction to review the matter. Accordingl y, we dismiss the app eal for want of jurisdicti on. Brian Quinn Chief Justice Do not publish
.