alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008223EN.01004502.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/45

---

Action brought on 6 June 2008 — Strack v Commission

(Case T-221/08)

(2008/C 223/79)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Guido Strack (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decisions, particularly the decision of 19 May 2008, adopted by the Commission — either actually or in the form of a deemed refusal under Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — in the context of the processing of the applicant's application for access to documents of 18 January 2008 and 19 January 2008 and his confirmatory application of 22 February 2008, 18 April 2008 and, in particular, 21 April 2008, in so far as they refuse those applications either in part or in full; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decisions, particularly the decision of 19 May 2008, adopted by the Commission — either actually or in the form of a deemed refusal under Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — in the context of the processing of the applicant's application for access to documents of 18 January 2008 and 19 January 2008 and his confirmatory application of 22 February 2008, 18 April 2008 and, in particular, 21 April 2008, in so far as they refuse those applications either in part or in full;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the applicant compensation for the immaterial and moral damage suffered by the applicant as a result of the processing of his application, of an appropriate amount, but at least symbolic damages in the amount of 1 Euro; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the applicant compensation for the immaterial and moral damage suffered by the applicant as a result of the processing of his application, of an appropriate amount, but at least symbolic damages in the amount of 1 Euro;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs of the procedure |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs of the procedure

Pleas in law and main arguments

On 18 and 19 January 2008, the applicant applied to the Commission for access to numerous documents. The applicant brings the present application because he was not granted access to those documents, at least partly, within the period provided for.

In support of his application, the applicant submits, in particular, that the defendant infringed Article 255 EC as well as Regulation No 1049/2001 (1). In addition, the applicant claims that there has been an infringement of the principles of good administration, Articles 41 and 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the principles governing the obligation to state reasons for refusal decisions laid down in Article 253 EC.

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43)

1

---
#### MARIE AREZZI, AN INFANT BY HER NEXT FRIEND, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ANTHONY CUTRALE, JR., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Argued March 14, 1949

Decided March 21, 1949.

■ *Mr. Harvey G. Stevenson*argued the cause for the defendants-appellants.

*Messrs. Lieb & Kolm,*attorneys for the plaintiffs-respondents.

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Donges in the former Supreme Court.

*For affirmance:*Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Heher, Wachenfeld, Burling and Aokerson—6.

*For reversal:*None.
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

February 16, 2011

Mr. Michael Krancer, Acting Secretary

Department of Environmental Protection

Rachel Carson State Office Building

P.O. Box 2063

Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063

Dear Secretary Krancer:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the 

Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Department of Environmental Protection

pertaining to amendments and addition to 25 Pa Code Chapter 129 submitted by your 

predecessor on October 1, 2010. Specifically, the revision concerns amendments to Sections 

129.51 and 129.52 (relating to general and to surface coating processes, respectively) and 

addition of a new Section 129.52a (relating to control of VOC emissions from large appliances 

and metal furniture surface coating processes). EPA has determined that the submittal is 

administratively and technically complete and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to

Mr. Christopher Cripps, Office of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-2179. He is the principal 

contact for this rulemaking. 

Sincerely,

 /s/

 

 Diana Esher, Director

 Air Protection Division 

cc: Joyce Epps, PA-DEP

 Arleen Shulman, PA-DEP

 Susan Hoyle, PA-DEP
# Hocking - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Rural Action: Moving Forest Communities Forward in Ohio Rural Action is using ARC support, and a partnership with the U.S. Forest Service, to help coal-impacted communities boost trails and tourism.The post Rural Action: Moving Forest Communities Forward in Ohio appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Buckeye Hills Regional Council Executive Director Chasity Schmelzenbach Email c&#115;&#x68;&#x6d;e&#108;&#x7a;&#x65;n&#98;&#x61;&#x63;h&#64;&#x62;&#x75;c&#107;&#x65;&#x79;e&#104;&#105;&#x6c;&#x6c;s&#46;&#x6f;&#x72;gThe post Buckeye Hills Regional Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 12/31/99
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>0000908612
<NAME>AMFM OPERATING INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,634
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  553,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                    21,428
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               641,810
<PP&E>                                         560,085
<DEPRECIATION>                                  89,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,819,869
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          290,577
<BONDS>                                      5,644,517
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,108,179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,819,869
<SALES>                                      1,977,888
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,977,888
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,048,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               859,235
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             414,993
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (94,922)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,027
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (126,141)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 15,142
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (146,874)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
CONTACT REPORT

Person Calling: Keith Barnett

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency OAQPS/ESD/OCG 919 - 541 - 5605 Person Called: Hector Ybanez

Holcim Cement Date of Contact: May 27, 2009 Contact Summary : Hector called with some data requests:  IS IS output sheets  Documentation of how we set up the MACT floor  Copy of TOC data from 114 responses  Copy of THC data  Daily Hg emissions for all kilns. There data were provided at a later date.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6014]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   AUTHORITY FOR COMMITTEES TO REPORT

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that notwithstanding 
the Senate's recess, committees be authorized to report legislative and 
executive matters on Tuesday, August 28, from 12 noon to 2 p.m.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              10,374
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                 108
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     2,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    10,118
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         45,918
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                     0
<LOANS>                                            158,790
<ALLOWANCE>                                          2,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     263,015
<DEPOSITS>                                         225,039
<SHORT-TERM>                                         7,600
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                    989
<LONG-TERM>                                          7,739
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             7,342
<OTHER-SE>                                          14,306
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                     263,015
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                     14,043
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    5,550
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                         0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                    19,593
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   9,251
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10,421
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                9,172
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                          300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                    (220)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      8,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      2,149
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,611
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.90
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        8.37
<LOANS-NON>                                            793
<LOANS-PAST>                                           757
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     1,904
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                          322
<RECOVERIES>                                           218
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    2,100
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 1,933
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                167
        


</TABLE>
# Delaware - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Southern Tier 8 Regional Board Executive Director Jennifer Gregory Email &#99;&#x6f;&#x6e;&#116;&#x61;&#x63;&#116;&#x40;&#x73;&#111;&#x75;&#x74;&#104;&#x65;&#x72;&#110;&#x74;&#x69;&#101;&#x72;&#x38;&#46;&#x6f;&#x72;&#103;The post Southern Tier 8 Regional Board appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2008128EN.01003802.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/38

---

Action brought on 30 March 2008 — Honnefelder v Commission

(Case F-41/08)

(2008/C 128/81)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Stephanie Honnefelder (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Bode, Rechtsanwalt)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Commission not to include the applicant on the reserve list for competition EPSO AD/26/05 on the ground that she was not awarded enough points

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Commission of 10 May 2007 and the decision of 14 December 2007 on the applicant's complaint and order the Commission to assess whether the applicant can be included on the reserve list in a manner that does not infringe the principle of equal treatment and follows proper procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Commission of 10 May 2007 and the decision of 14 December 2007 on the applicant's complaint and order the Commission to assess whether the applicant can be included on the reserve list in a manner that does not infringe the principle of equal treatment and follows proper procedure;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs;

| — | as a precautionary measure, enter a judgment by default. |
| --- | --- |

—

as a precautionary measure, enter a judgment by default.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**ROBERT L. GREEN,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 629 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**RYAN BAKER,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 630 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 28th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of t his matter.**
# C_2008107EN.01003701.xml

| 26.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/37

---

Action brought on 22 February 2008 — Global Digital Disc v Commission

(Case T-96/08)

(2008/C 107/62)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Global Digital Disc GmBH & Co. KG (Dresden, Germany) (represented by: E. Stein, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Commission decision COMP/C-3/38.803 of 7 December 2007 — Global Digital Disc (GDD) v Philips; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Commission decision COMP/C-3/38.803 of 7 December 2007 — Global Digital Disc (GDD) v Philips;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant contests Commission decision COMP/C-3/38.803 of 7 December 2007 — Global Digital Disc (GDD) v Philips. In that decision the Commission dismissed the applicant's complaint, in which it pleaded several infringements of Article 82 EC by the party complained of in connection with that party's licensing practice in the CD-R field, pursuant to Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 (1).

1

In its grounds of complaint the applicant contends first that the Commission failed to fulfil its obligation to give reasons. Furthermore the defendant infringed the applicant's rights of defence. Finally the applicant complains that the Commission's arguments for rejecting the Community-wide importance of the subject-matter of the complaint are misjudged.

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty (OJ 2004 L 123, p. 18).

1

---
#### Kass & Company, Inc., Appellant, *v.*Edward S. Beredyn et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of High Grade Manufacturing Co., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

June 4, 1959.

*550*Herbst & Herbst (Samuel B. Herbst*and *Jesse H. Brenner*of counsel), for appellant.

*Friedman & Friedman (Hyman B. Friedman*of counsel), for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

There was no irregularity on the face of either note to put plaintiff on notice that there were any restrictions surrounding the delivery of the notes, nor is there any proof that plaintiff had knowledge thereof.

The order denying summary judgment to plaintiff should be reversed, and summary judgment directed in favor of plaintiff, with $10 costs.

Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Hecht and Aurelio, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.
# Rockbridge - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission Executive Director Bonnie Riedesel Email &#99;&#x73;&#x70;d&#99;&#x40;c&#115;&#x70;d&#99;&#x2e;o&#114;&#x67;The post Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Exhibit 23.0  Consent of Independent Auditors CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Numbers 333-41323,
333-156331, and 333-156829) of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. of our report relating to the financial statements
of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. dated March 4, 2009, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Diamond Hill
Investment Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008. /s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC

March 13, 2009

Columbus, Ohio
No. 07-14-00399-CV

In the Interest of S.V., K.V.,

and E.V., Children §

§

§

§ From the County Court at Law

of Moore County

March 24, 2015

Opinion by Justice Hancock

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated March 24, 2015

, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis

, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
**Exhibit 32.(b).****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas P. Reed, Vice President of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.            /s/ Thomas P. Reed           Thomas P. Reed      (chief financial officer)      November 13, 2006
RESIGNATION OF PHILIP R. ALFANO



 Exhibit 10.44 
  
 Resignation of Philip R. Alfano 
  
 On November 8, 2004, Philip R. Alfano, the Company’s Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer announced, for personal reasons, his intention to
step down from his current position with the Company effective December 31, 2004.
#### STEPHENS v. STATE.

No. A-11665.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Dec. 31, 1952.

Percy Hughes, Hobart, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

JONES, Judge.

The defendant, ' Melvin Stephens, was charged by an information filed in the County Court of Kiowa County with driving an" automobile on the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, was tried, ’ convicted and pursuant to the verdict of the jury was sentenced to pay' a fine of one dollar, and has appealed.

The cause was regularly assigned for oral argument and no one appeared. *183Neither has there been any brief filed. Under such circumstances pursuant to the rules of this court we examine the record for fundamental error and if none appears the judgment and sentence will be upheld.

The state’s proof showed that the accused was driving an automobile on Highway 9 in Kiowa County a few miles from Hobart. His actions on the road were such that the sheriff was notified and he apprehended the defendant while he was driving. The sheriff testified that defendant’s car was weaving on the highway and after he arrested the defendant he observed him and saw that he was in an intoxicated condition. Two other witnesses who saw the defendant corroborated the testimony of the sheriff. The defendant denied that he was intoxicated although admitting that he had drunk two bottles of beer about 3:30 or 4:00 o’clock that afternoon. He explained his weaving on the road by saying a- car drove up behind him with a bright light shining in his mirror and he turned his car to avoid being blinded' by a reflection from the light.

 The evidence raised a question of fact for the determination of the jury and their verdict will be sustained.

The instructions fairly stated the law and we have found no substantial error which would require a reversal of the conviction.

The judgment and sentence of the County Court of Kiowa County is accordingly affirmed.

BRETT, P. J., and POWELL, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 12



PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(UNAUDITED)

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)





The following table sets forth our ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the periods indicated:



|                                                 |  |        |   | FISCAL YEAR ENDED
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ------ | - | -----------------
|                                                 |  |        |   |                  
|                                                 |  |        |   | December 28,
2002
|                                                 |  |        |   |                  
|EARNINGS:                                        |  |        |   |                  
|Earnings before income taxes                     |  |        | $ | 106,362          
|Fixed charges, exclusive of capitalized interest |  | 20,492 |   | 11,493           
|                                                 |  |        |   | $                
|                                                 |  |        |   |                  
|FIXED CHARGES:                                   |  |        |   |                  
|Interest charge to expense                       |  |        | $ | 18,763           
|Interest portion of rental expense               |  | 1,729  |   | 2,686            
|                                                 |  |        |   |                  
|Fixed charges, exclusive of capitalized interest |  | 20,492 |   | 11,493           
|Capitalized interest                             |  |        |   |                  
|                                                 |  |        |   | $                
|                                                 |  |        |   |                  
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges               |  | 6.1    |   | 6.4