alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008247EN.01002601.xml

| 27.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/26

---

Action brought on 25 July 2008 — De Smedt and Others v Parliament

(Case F-66/08)

(2008/C 247/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Emile De Smedt (Brussels, Belgium) and Others (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the individual decisions of the appointing authority refusing to grant the applicants the allowances for shiftwork referred to in Article 56a of the Staff Regulations pursuant to Council Regulation No 1873/2006 of 11 December 2006 amending Regulation No 300/76 determining the categories of officials entitled to allowances for shift work, and the rates and conditions thereof, and those allowances referred to in Article 56b of the Staff Regulations pursuant to Council Regulation No 1945/2006 of 11 December 2006 amending Regulation No 495/77 determining the categories of officials entitled to, and the conditions for and rates of, allowances for regular standby duty.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the individual decisions of the appointing authority refusing to grant the applicants the allowances for shiftwork referred to in Article 56a of the Staff Regulations pursuant to Council Regulation No 1873/2006 of 11 December 2006 amending Regulation No 300/76 determining the categories of officials entitled to allowances for shift work, and the rates and conditions thereof; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the individual decisions of the appointing authority refusing to grant the applicants the allowances for shiftwork referred to in Article 56a of the Staff Regulations pursuant to Council Regulation No 1873/2006 of 11 December 2006 amending Regulation No 300/76 determining the categories of officials entitled to allowances for shift work, and the rates and conditions thereof;

| — | Annul the individual decisions of the appointing authority refusing to grant the applicants the allowances referred to in Article 56b of the Staff Regulations pursuant to Council Regulation No 1945/2006 of 11 December 2006 amending Regulation No 495/77 determining the categories of officials entitled to, and the conditions for and rates of, allowances for regular standby duty; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the individual decisions of the appointing authority refusing to grant the applicants the allowances referred to in Article 56b of the Staff Regulations pursuant to Council Regulation No 1945/2006 of 11 December 2006 amending Regulation No 495/77 determining the categories of officials entitled to, and the conditions for and rates of, allowances for regular standby duty;

| — | Order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




Our report on the consolidated financial statements of Philadelphia Consolidated
Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996 has been incorporated by
reference in this Form 10-K from page 22 of the 1996 Annual Report to
Shareholders of Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries. In
connection with our audits of such consolidated financial statements, we have
also audited the related financial statement schedules as of December 31, 1996
and 1995 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996
listed in the Index to Financial Statement Schedules on page 16 of this Form
10-K.

In our opinion, the financial statement schedules as of December 31, 1996 and
1995 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996
referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects,
the information required to be included therein.

/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
----------------------------
2400 Eleven Penn Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 7, 1997
EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



EXHIBIT 32.1



I, Craig H. Barratt, the chief executive officer of Atheros Communications, Inc. (the
Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,:



|(i) | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 10, 2004



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Craig H. Barratt                 
|Craig H. Barratt                     
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|(Principal Executive Officer)
# Appalachian Leadership Institute - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Krystina Burton Program Analyst.The post Krystina Burton appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Gloria Baca The post Gloria Baca appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Jessica Mosley Program Manager.The post Jessica Mosley appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

[Solloa Letterhead]

 

June 18, 2012

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, DC 20549

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We have read Item 16F of Form 20-F of **Promotora y Operadora de Infraestructura, S.A.B de C.V.** for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and are in agreement with the statements contained therein.

 
| /s/ Javier Solloa                                   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| C.P.A. Javier Solloa                                |   |
| Principal Partner                                   |   |
| Solloa, Tello de Meneses y Compañía, S.C. |   |
| Member Firm of Nexia International.                 |   |

 

----
#### Louis LONGO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CARLISLE DeCOPPET & CO., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 1135, Docket 76-7151.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued June 10, 1976.

Decided June 23, 1976.

Ronald R. Coles, New York City (Coles & Weiner, New York City, Robert Hayhurst, Student, Fordham Law School, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

James W. Rayhill, New York City (Carter, Ledyard & Milburn, Kenneth P. Clark, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

Before FRIENDLY, FEINBERG and VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals, pursuant to certification under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denying defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s Title VII sex-discrimination action for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff alleged that he was fired because of the length of his hair, which would have been permissible on a female employee. Although defendant disputes the factual premise of the suit (contending that Longo was fired for other reasons), it argues that even assuming the' truth of his version, defendant did not violate Title VII. We agree.

All four courts of appeals that have ruled on the question have held that requiring short hair on men and not on women does not violate Title VII. *Knott v. Missouri Pac. R.R.,*527 F.2d 1249 (8th Cir. 1975); *Willingham v. Macon Telegraph Publ. Co.,*507 F.2d 1084 (5th Cir. 1975) (en banc), vacating 482 F.2d 535 (5th Cir. 1973); *Baker v. California Land Title Co.,*507 F.2d 895 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1046, 95 S.Ct. 2664, 45 L.Ed.2d 699 (1975); *Dodge v. Giant Food, Inc.,*160 U.S.App.D.C. 9, 488 F.2d 1333 (1973); *Fagan v. National Cash Register Co.,*157 U.S.App.D.C. 15, 481 F.2d 1115 (1973). Without necessarily adopting all of the reasoning of those opinions, we are content to abide by this unanimous result.

Judgment reversed with instructions to dismiss the complaint.
**Exhibit 32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C.
          SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906
          OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
          connection with the Quarterly Report of ZBB Energy Corporation (the “Company”)
          on Form 10-QSB for the three and six months ended December 31, 2007 as
          filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
          “Report”), I, Robert J. Parry, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
          certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
          18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge, that:
 
 (1) The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
          provided to ZBB Energy Corporation and will be retained by ZBB Energy
          Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
          its staff
          upon request.


|                                          |                                                                           |                                 
|----------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------
|                                          |                                                                           |                                 
|                                          |                                                                           | /s/  Robert
            J. Parry
|                                          | Robert J. Parry
            *(Principal Executive
              Officer)*
|February
            14,
            2008 |
# C_2010221EN.01005902.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/59

---

Order of the General Court of 16 June 2010 — CPS Color Group v OHIM-Fema Farben and Putze (TEMACOLOR)

(Case T-295/08) (1)

1

()

2010/C 221/94

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.9.2008.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dresser, Inc. (Dresser) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on December 12, 2003 (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge and upon a review of the Report, that, subject to the qualifications noted below:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dresser as of the dates and for periods
presented as required by such Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In
rendering this certification, the undersigned notes the following qualifications, each of which limits and qualifies the above certification because they may materially alter the information required to be in the Report for the above certification
to be correct:



| | (a) | The Report was not filed within 45 days after the end of Dressers fiscal quarter as required by General Instruction A to Form 10-Q.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | Each of the qualifications and limitations set forth in the Report, including the notes to the financial statements contained therein and the matters covered under Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This certification is qualified by the foregoing and is based upon, among other things, the undersigneds
responsibilities as chief executive officer, his own due diligence and representations made by certain members of Dressers senior management.



Dated: December 11, 2003



/s/    Patrick M. MurrayPatrick M. Murray Chief Executive Officer




This
certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Dresser for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of Matrix Concepts, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Gary Martin
---------------------------------------------------
Gary Martin
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
February 10, 2006


                                       18
Exhibit 23.3



CONSENT OF EXPERT



I consent to the reference to me under
the headings “Item 3.A Selected Financial Data–Risks Relating To Our Business–Our Reserve Estimates Could
Be Subject To Significant Changes,” “Item 4.D Property, Plant and Equipment–Caliche: Facilities and Reserves”
and “Item 19. Exhibits” in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (“SQM”)
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016:



|April
    26, 2017 | /s/
    Álvaro Henríquez            
|------------------ | ------------------------------------
|                   | Álvaro
    Henríquez                
|                   | Superintendent
    of Geology of SQM
**EXHIBIT 32.1**








**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Treasure Mountain Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Vincent De Caprio, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|January 19, 2005 | /s/ Vincent De Caprio
Vincent De Caprio
Chief Executive Officer
|---------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------







This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
#### In the Matter of Jose Rivera, Appellant, v Maria Echaveste et al., Respondents.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fred Eggert, J.), entered on or about August 26, 1991, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Fred Eggert, *767J., without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Carro, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 16

- 00009

- CV
WILLIAM R. AND SUSAN M. KNODERER, Appellants V. STATE FARM LLOYDS, PENNI PERKINS AND TOM ROBERTS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 354th District Court

Hunt County, Texas Trial Court No. 74,037

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 

### O R D E R William R. and Susan M. Knoderer, appellants , have filed a n unopposed motion requesting that the appellate record filed in cause number 06

- 13

- 00027

- CV, also styled William R. and Susan M. Knoderer v. State Farm Lloyds, Penni Perkins, and Tom Roberts , be incorporated into this matter and made a part o f the appellate record in this cause. We grant the motion, to the extent possible. We note that original documents marked “Exhibit 31” were filed as part of the record in cause number 06

- 13

- 00027

- CV. Those original exhibits were returned to the Hunt Cou nty District Clerk’s Office once the mandate issued in 06

- 13

- 00027

- CV; consequently, those records are specifically excepted from the dictates of this order. The clerk of this Court is ordered to incorporate the appellate record, excepting the originally filed documents marked “Exhibit 31,” from cause number 06

- 13

- 00027

- CV into cause number 06

- 1 6

- 000 09

- CV as a part of the appellate record in that matter
. See T EX . R. A PP . P
. 2. IT IS SO ORDERED. BY THE COURT Date: May 17, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT JUNE 30, 1998 FOR THE
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000909117
<NAME>              ROSEWOOD CARE CENTER OF ALTON
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,866
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                       168
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,689
<PP&E>                                          25,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,966
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            65
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,421
<SALES>                                         31,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,153
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,924
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,456
<INCOME-TAX>                                       265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,191
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
•::-vT:!rG ^ 

' ' ^ June 8,2011 

Petition for Exemption 

Rules Docket (AGC-10) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

To Whom It May Concern; 

I would like to apply for an exemption to FAR 91.109(a)^ pennitting me to 

instruct in single-control Beechcraft aircraft. I have over 1 ^000 hours experience 

in both single-control and dual-control Beechcraft aircraft, and, until recently, I 

owned and flew a single-control Beechcraft Bonanza. Instruction would only be 

given to pilots that are qualified to act as PIC, i.e., those that have complex and 

high pertbrmance endorsements for single-engine aircraft, as well as multi-engine 

ratings for multi-engine aircraft. 

Sincerely, 

Donald E. Wright 

CFII1424826 

105 Old Forge Rd, 

Box 209 

Erwinna, FA 18920 

dwri eht(2).eDix. net 

Cell 908 285 1767 

30 39Wd 9NI>iyW3"iny JO 30IJJ 0 Si09Z.9320S T0:Tt TI02/St/^0