alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 4696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01623]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

[Public Notice 2013-3008]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: EIB 92-36 Application for Issuing Bank Credit Limit 
(IBCL) Under Lender or Exporter-Held Policies.
SUMMARY: The Export-Import Banks of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    This collection of information is necessary, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 
635(a)(1), to determine eligibility of the applicant for Ex-Im Bank 
assistance.
    The application tool can be reviewed at: http://www.exim.gov/pub/pending/Form%20EIB%2092-36%20v3.pdf.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 28, 2014 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on 
www.regulations.gov or by mail to Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20038, Attn: OMB 3048-92-
36.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title and Form Number: EIB 92-36 Application for Issuing Bank 
Credit Limit (IBCL) Under Lender or Exporter-Held Policies
    OMB Number: 3048-0016
    Type of Review: Regular
    Need and Use: This form is used by an insured exporter or lender 
(or broker acting on its behalf) in order to obtain approval for 
coverage of the repayment risk of an overseas bank. The information 
received allows Ex-Im Bank staff to make a determination of the 
creditworthiness of the foreign bank and the underlying export sale for 
Ex-Im Bank assistance under its programs.
    This form has been updated to include a new Certification and 
Notices section as well as a new statement explaining Ex-Im Bank's 
limitation on support for goods subject to trade measures or sanctions.
    Affected Public:
    This form affects entities involved in the export of U.S. goods and 
services.
Annual Number of Respondents: 480
Estimated Time per Respondent: 1 hour
Annual Burden Hours: 480 hours
Frequency of Reporting of Use: As needed
    Government Expenses:
Reviewing time per year: 480 hours
Average Wages per Hour: $42.50
Average Cost per Year: $20,400
(time*wages)
Benefits and Overhead: 20%
Total Government Cost: $24,480

Bonita Jones,
Program Analyst, Records Management Division, Agency Clearance Officer, 
Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-01623 Filed 1-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
Exhibit 10.1


 


Spherix Incorporated


 


SUMMARY OF ANNUAL COMPENSATION OF MEMBERS OF

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SPHERIX INCORPORATED


 


Non-employee directors of Spherix Incorporated (“Spherix”) receive the
following annual compensation for service as a member of Spherix:


 


•                  Annual retainer
of $2,000;


 


•                  Fees of $1,200
for each meeting of the Spherix board and each in-person Spherix committee
meeting attended not in conjunction with a board meeting;  and


 


•                  Stock option for
shares of Spherix common stock with an exercise price equal to the closing
price on the date of grant.  The number
of option shares grant annually is typically between one thousand and two
thousand for each director; however, in 2004 no options were granted to the
Directors.
# C_2008116EN.01003401.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/34

---

Action brought on 22 February 2008 — Wilms v Commission

(Case F-24/08)

(2008/C 116/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Günter Wilms (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. van der Woude, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of 17 April 2007 in so far as it awards the applicant no additional priority points in the 2003 Promotion procedure, making a total of 1 priority point and a grand total of 19 points, and an order that the defendant pay compensation.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 17 April 2007 in so far as it awards the applicant no additional priority points in the 2003 Promotion procedure, making a total of 1 priority point and a grand total of 19 points; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 17 April 2007 in so far as it awards the applicant no additional priority points in the 2003 Promotion procedure, making a total of 1 priority point and a grand total of 19 points;

| — | order the defendant to pay compensation of at least EUR 5 000; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay compensation of at least EUR 5 000;

| — | order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
# Potter - Appalachian Regional Commission

- North Central Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission Executive Director James Chorney Email &#110;&#x63;&#x70;r&#112;&#x64;c&#64;&#x6e;&#x63;e&#110;&#x74;r&#97;&#x6c;&#x2e;c&#111;&#x6d;The post North Central Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Opinion issued August 30, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-24-00622--CV

———————————

IN RE MARIA SANCHEZ, RELATOR

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Maria Sanchez, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting 

that this Court vacate the trial court’s “Rendition on a Divorce Without Children,” 

signed by the trial court on July 17, 2024.

1

1 The underlying case is In the Matter of the Marriage of Maria Sanchez and Ysidro 

Hernandez., cause number 2021-72513, pending in the 309th District Court of 

Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Linda Marie Dunson, presiding.
2

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We 

dismiss any pending motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996                   DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             880                         1,503
<SECURITIES>                                         0                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                             0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                             0
<PP&E>                                               0                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,439                        11,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                             0
<BONDS>                                              0                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                             0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                             0
<COMMON>                                             0                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                             0
<SALES>                                              0                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                             0
<CGS>                                                0                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                             0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                             0
<CHANGES>                                            0                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                             0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2010288EN.01001102.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Republic of Lithuania)) — Kirin Amgen Inc. v Lietuvos Respublikos valstybinis patentų biuras

(Case C-66/09) (1)

(Patent law - Proprietary medicinal products - Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92 - Articles 7, 19 and 19a(e) - Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products - Period for lodging the application for such a certificate)

(2010/C 288/17)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Kirin Amgen Inc.

Defendant: Lietuvos Respublikos valstybinis patentų biuras

Intervener: Amgen Europe BV

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas — Interpretation of Articles 3(b), 7(1), 13(1), 19 and 23 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92 of 18 June 1992 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (OJ 1992 L 182, p. 1) — Company holding a European patent and a Community marketing authorisation for a medicinal product, which applied for a supplementary protection certificate for that product — Determination of the commencement date of the period laid down for lodging an application for a supplementary protection certificate — Date on which the marketing authorisation was granted or date on which the regulation in question entered into force for Lithuania through its accession to the European Union

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 7 and 19a(e) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92 of 18 June 1992 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products, as amended by the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded, must be interpreted as not allowing the holder of a valid basic patent in respect of a product to apply to the competent Lithuanian authorities, within six months of the date upon which the Republic of Lithuania acceded to the European Union, for the grant of a supplementary protection certificate where an authorisation to place that product on the market as a medicinal product was obtained more than six months before accession under Council Regulation (EEC) No 2309/93 of 22 July 1993 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, but the product did not obtain a marketing authorisation in Lithuania.

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 18.4.2009.

---
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4293 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 12, 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To reform the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review 

process, the Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test process, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4293 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stress Test Improve3 ment Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CCAR AND DFAST REFORMS. 

5 Section 165(i) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Re6 form and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5365(i)) 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

9 (A) in subparagraph (B)(i)— 

10 (i) by striking ‘‘3 different’’ and in11 serting ‘‘2 different’’; and 

12 (ii) by striking ‘‘, adverse,’’; and 

13 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(C) CCAR REQUIREMENTS.— 

15 ‘‘(i) LIMITATION ON QUALITATIVE

16 CAPITAL PLANNING OBJECTIONS.—In car17 rying out CCAR, the Board of Governors 

18 may not object to a company’s capital plan 

19 on the basis of qualitative deficiencies in 

20 the company’s capital planning process. 

21 ‘‘(ii) CCAR DEFINED.—For purposes 

22 of this subparagraph and subparagraph 

23 (E), the term ‘CCAR’ means the Com24 prehensive Capital Analysis and Review es25 tablished by the Board of Governors.’’; and 

26 (2) in paragraph (2)— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4293 RFS

1 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking 

2 ‘‘semiannual’’ and inserting ‘‘annual’’; and 

3 (B) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by striking ‘‘3 

4 different sets of conditions, including baseline, 

5 adverse,’’ and inserting ‘‘2 different sets of con6 ditions, including baseline’’. 

7 SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

8 The amendments made by this Act may not be con9 strued to prohibit an appropriate Federal banking agency 

10 (as defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance 

11 Act (12 U.S.C. 1813)) from— 

12 (1) ensuring the safety and soundness of an en13 tity regulated by such an appropriate Federal bank14 ing agency; and 

15 (2) ensuring compliance with applicable laws, 

16 regulations, and supervisory policies, and the fol17 lowing of appropriate guidance, by an entity regu18 lated by such an appropriate Federal banking agen19 cy. 

20 SEC. 4. REDUCTION OF SURPLUS FUNDS OF FEDERAL RE21 SERVE BANKS. 

22 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7(a)(3)(A) of the Federal 

23 Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 289(a)(3)(A)) is amended by 

24 striking ‘‘$7,500,000,000’’ and inserting 

25 ‘‘$7,480,000,000’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 4293 RFS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall take ef2 fect on June 1, 2018. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 11, 2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
# C_2013156EN.01002701.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2013 — Stowarzyszenie Autorów ZAiKS v Commission

(Case T-398/08) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Sharing of the geographic market - Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies - Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences - Proof - Presumption of innocence)

2013/C 156/45

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Stowarzyszenie Autorów ZAiKS (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: B. Borkowska and M. Błeszyński, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and K. Mojzesowicz, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 3 of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC), in so far as it concerns Stowarzyszenie Autorów ZAiKS); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 3 of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final of 16 July 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 — CISAC), in so far as it concerns Stowarzyszenie Autorów ZAiKS);

| 2. | Annuls Article 4(2) and (3) of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final, to the extent that they refer to Article 3 of that decision, in so far as they concern Stowarzyszenie Autorów ZAiKS; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls Article 4(2) and (3) of Commission Decision C(2008) 3435 final, to the extent that they refer to Article 3 of that decision, in so far as they concern Stowarzyszenie Autorów ZAiKS;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 4. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs relating to the main proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs relating to the main proceedings.

| 5. | Orders Autorów ZAiKS and the Commission to each bear their own costs relating to the interim relief proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders Autorów ZAiKS and the Commission to each bear their own costs relating to the interim relief proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 8.11.2008.

1

---
# C_2010179EN.01001101.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 May 2010 — European Commission v French Republic

(Case C-94/09) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - VAT - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 98(1) and (2) - Supply of services by undertakers - Application of a reduced rate to the service involving transportation of a body by vehicle)

(2010/C 179/16)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Afonso, Agent)

Defendant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and J.-S. Pilczer, Agents)

Re:

Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 96 to 99(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — Activities of undertakers — Obligation to apply a single rate of tax to an indivisible complex service provided by undertakers — Prohibition on applying variable reduced rates of VAT

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 16.5.2009.

---
Exhibit 13.1

906 CERTIFICATION

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Wang Zhiqing, the President of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) , as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: September 14, 2017



By:

/s/ Wang ZhiqingName:

Wang ZhiqingTitle:

President