alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008260EN.01001301.xml

| 11.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/13

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 27 August 2008 — Melli Bank v Council

(Case T-246/08 R)

(Applications for interim measures - Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 - Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran - Council decision - Measure to freeze funds and economic resources - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency - Absence of serious and irreparable damage)

(2008/C 260/23)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Melli Bank plc (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Gordon, QC, J. Stratford, M. Hoskins, Barristers, R. Gwynne and T. Din, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and E. Finnegan, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: V. Jackson, acting as Agent, and S. Lee, Barrister) and French Republic (represented by: E. Belliard, G. de Bergues and L. Butel, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of the application of paragraph 4, section B, of the Annex to Council Decision 2008/475/EC of 23 June 2008 implementing Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2008 L 163, p. 29), in so far as Melli Bank plc is included in the list of legal persons, entities and bodies whose funds and economic resources are frozen.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Connections Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                      |  |     |                        
|--------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  |     |                        
|                      |  | By: | /s/ BRIAN NEILL        
|                      |  |     | BRIAN NEILL            
|                      |  |     | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5923]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. LARSON of Connecticut:
       H.R. 6384.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Clause 1, Section 8, Article I
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Walter Lee Anderson, Appellant.

— Appeal by the defendant *807from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (King, J.), rendered August 8, 1989, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We do not agree with the defendant’s contention that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That evidence included the defendant’s confession, the testimony of eyewitnesses who described in detail the clothing of the perpetrator which matched that of the defendant, and testimony of other eyewitnesses who saw the defendant at the scene of the crime directly before and after its occurrence. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *(see,*CPL 60.50; *People v Lipsky,*57 NY2d 560, 571). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

We also conclude that the possibility that two jurors briefly and inadvertently observed the defendant in handcuffs as he was ushered into the courthouse provides no basis for reversal of the judgment *(see, People v Harper,*47 NY2d 857, 858; *People v Walker,*139 AD2d 546; *see also, People v Soltis,*137 AD2d 732).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including his contention that evidence adduced at trial demonstrates that a motion to suppress tangible evidence should have been granted *(cf., People v Wilkins,*65 NY2d 172, 180; *People v Smith,*158 AD2d 488; *see, People v Smith,*134 AD2d 382), and find them to be either without merit or unpreserved for our review. In view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, we decline to reach the unpreserved issues in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction *(see, People v Oliver,*63 NY2d 973; *People v Dordal,*55 NY2d 954). Mangano, P. J., Kooper, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4627 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4627

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to authorize expenditures to 
combat emerging terrorist threats, including vehicular attacks, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 12, 2017

 Mr. Donovan (for himself, Mr. Payne, Mr. McCaul, and Mr. King of New 
    York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to authorize expenditures to 
combat emerging terrorist threats, including vehicular attacks, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Shielding Public Spaces from 
Vehicular Terrorism Act''.

SEC. 2. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.

    The Homeland Security Act of 2002 is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (11) of section 302 (6 U.S.C. 182), by 
        inserting ``research and development to combat emerging 
        terrorist threats, such as vehicular attacks, and'' before 
        ``the long-term''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B) of section 308(b)(2) (6 U.S.C. 
        188(b)(2))--
                    (A) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking 
                ``expertise in--'' and inserting ``expertise in the 
                following:'';
                    (B) by redesignating clause (xiv) as clause (xv); 
                and
                    (C) by inserting after clause (xiii) the following 
                new clause:
                            ``(xiv) Combatting emerging terrorist 
                        threats, including vehicular attacks.''.

SEC. 3. ALLOWABLE USES.

    Section 2008 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 609) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraphs (11) through (13) 
                as (12) through (14), respectively; and
                    (B) by inserting after paragraph (10) the following 
                new paragraph:
            ``(11) addressing security vulnerabilities of public 
        spaces, including through the installation of bollards and 
        other target hardening activities;''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B) of subsection (b)(3), by striking 
        ``(a)(10)'' and inserting ``(a)(12)''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1494-E1495]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       HIGHLAND 175TH ANNIVERSARY

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. JOHN SHIMKUS

                              of illinois

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 12, 2012

  Mr. SHIMKUS. Mr. Speaker, today I rise to recognize the 175th 
birthday of the great city of Highland, Illinois. Originally settled in 
1831 by the Swiss immigrant Koepfli family, and named Helvetia, or New 
Switzerland, Highland got its name five years later when a local man, 
General Joseph Semple, commented that the area reminded him of his 
native Scotland. A year after that, in 1837, Highland was formally 
chartered as a city. The town still retains its connection to 
Switzerland, partnering with the Koepfli's home in Switzerland, Sursee, 
as a Sister City since the 1970s, and hosting numerous festivals each 
year honoring the Swiss and German roots of the community.
  Highland was the home of Louis Latzer, also known as the Father of 
Pet Milk, because he was the man who perfected the process of 
condensing milk, thereby making milk, and its myriad health benefits, 
available to large numbers of people. Mr. Latzer's homestead and museum 
remain open today in Highland for visitors.
  Today, Highland is home to 9,919 people, the Highland Bulldogs, and 
many fine civic clubs, churches, and businesses, large and small. In 
September, the city will celebrate the 175th Jubilee, a three-day 
celebration of Highland's proud past, while looking toward a bright 
future.
  I want to congratulate Mayor Joe Michaelis and Lynn Hargus, President 
of the Highland Historical Society, along with their staffs and

[[Page E1495]]

volunteers, for all of their hard work organizing this fall's Jubilee. 
I especially want to salute all the hard-working citizens of Highland, 
past and present, who have made the community such a great place to 
live and work. I am proud to represent such an outstanding community, 
and I want to wish them another 175 years of success.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 123 (Thursday, September 13, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6000]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. HEINRICH:
       H.R. 6399.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5872]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            PRODUCTION TAX CREDIT AND INVESTMENT TAX CREDIT

  (Mr. KEATING asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mr. KEATING. Mr. Speaker, I rise to reiterate my support for the wind 
production tax credit and the investment tax credit for offshore wind.
  The production tax credit has encouraged nearly $20 billion in 
nationwide private investment annually over the last 5 years, while the 
ITC serves as the most fundamental Federal tax incentive for offshore 
wind development.
  As we promote investments that will reduce our dependence on foreign 
oil and serve as a central part in our fight against climate change, 
it's essential to remember the spillover of job creation and 
specialized expertise that will follow.
  In Massachusetts, we've witnessed firsthand the critical economic 
development opportunities of renewable energy projects provided to our 
States. Our region has undergone an economic regeneration with the 
development of Cape Wind, the Nation's first offshore wind fund. From 
the Port of New Bedford, which will serve as the staging area for 
turbine assembly, to the ferry captains who will provide eco-tours of 
the turbines, few communities will not be benefited by this.
  Massachusetts is already recognized as one of the top three States 
for clean energy. We're home to nearly 5,000 individual clean energy 
companies, and nearly 2 percent of all Massachusetts jobs are now in 
this field.
  It's important, as we go forward, that we not let this void occur, 
and we fill it with jobs made in America.

                          ____________________
```
Order entered March 14, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 15
- 00818
- CR
CHRISTOPHER JAMES HOLDER , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 41 6th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416
- 80782
- 2013
O RDER This case has been remanded to this Court from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Appellant shall file a supplemental brief or written waiver of further briefi ng no later than April 4, 202 2 , and the State shall file its supplemental brief or written waiver of further briefing no later than April 25 , 202 2

.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1501]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. GEORGE MILLER

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 12, 2012

  Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California. Mr. Speaker, on September 10, 2012, 
I was unavoidably detained. Had I been present, I would have voted as 
follows: on rollcall vote No. 557, I would have voted ``yea''; on 
rollcall vote No. 558, I would have voted ``yea''; on rollcall vote No. 
559, I would have voted ``yea.''

                          ____________________
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-50639

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALBERTO MORENO, also known as Viejo,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:11-CR-189-5

Before JOLLY, SMITH, AND CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alberto Moreno appeals his convictions following a jury trial of conspiring

to possess with intent to distribute 1000 kilograms or more of marijuana and

conspiring to commit money laundering. 

Moreno fails to show that his right to an impartial jury drawn from a fair

cross-section of the community was violated; he cites only the composition of the

randomly chosen venire at his own trial and does not attempt to show a

systematic exclusion of minorities from other venires over time in the Western

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 13, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-50639 Document: 00512372802 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/13/2013
No. 12-50639

District of Texas’s jury selection process. See Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357,

364 (1979); United States v. Williams, 264 F.3d 561, 568 (5th Cir. 2001). 

Likewise, while he claims that the district court abused its discretion by limiting

his Confrontation Clause rights to cross-examine Government witnesses, he fails

to cite any evidence showing that he was clearly prejudiced by the limitations of

which he complains. See United States v. Landerman, 109 F. 3d 1053, 1061 (5th

Cir. 1997). Finally, Moreno does not identify with specificity any instance in

which the district court refused to admit into evidence the criminal conviction

of any Government witness. See FED. R. EVID. 609.

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 12-50639 Document: 00512372802 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/13/2013
#### Laurel A. Lindner, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Richard A. Lindner, Deceased, Appellant, v City of Buffalo et al., Defendants, and Mary L. Bradley et al., Respondents.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly charged the jury that any negligence of defendant Lester Bradley in causing the first accident could not be considered a proximate cause of decedent’s injuries sustained as a result of the second accident *(see, Osowicki v Engert,*85 AD2d 778, *lv denied*55 NY2d 608; *Stanton v Clegg,*278 App Div 486; *Gralton v Oliver,*277 App Div 449, *affd*302 NY 864). Further, we conclude that the jury’s finding, that defendant Lester Bradley’s negligence in leaving the scene of the first accident was not a proximate *580cause of the second accident and of decedent’s injuries, was not against the weight of the evidence. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Ostrowski, J. — Negligence.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
# C_2008223EN.01005301.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/53

---

Action brought on 26 June 2008 — Associazione Giullemanidallajuve v Commission

(Case T-254/08)

(2008/C 223/93)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: L'Associazione Giullemanidallajuve (Garibaldi, Italy) (represented by: L.Misson, G. Ernes and A. Kettels, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that the Commission has failed to act; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the Commission has failed to act;

| — | instruct the Commission to use its powers and to reply to the complaint lodged by the applicant in May 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

instruct the Commission to use its powers and to reply to the complaint lodged by the applicant in May 2007;

| — | obtain all the information necessary for that purpose. |
| --- | --- |

—

obtain all the information necessary for that purpose.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant claims that theCommission failed to fulfil its obligation to act in that after being invited to do so it did not express its opinion on the complaint lodged by the applicant with the Commission in May 2007 concerning alleged contraventions of Articles 81 and 82 EC committed by the Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC), the Comitato Olimpico Nazionale Italiano (CONI), the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) and the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA).

The applicant considers that the letter which was sent to it by the Commission in March 2008 further to the invitation to act and which informed it that the case was being dealt with, does not represent an expression of opinion, since the letter did not provide any replies on the substance of the requests made by the applicant.

The applicant also claims that, in the area of competition, a complainer is entitled to expect that its complaint will be examined thoroughly by the Commission, and that a reasoned opinion will be expressed.

---
IB 

Union Calendar No. 367 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4581 

[Report No. 115–493] 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop best practices 

for utilizing advanced passenger information and passenger name record 

data for counterterrorism screening and vetting operations, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2017 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself, Miss RICE of New York, Mr. KATKO, Mr. GALLAGHER, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. GARRETT, 

and Mr. MCCAUL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security 

JANUARY 9, 2018 

Additional sponsors: Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN and Mrs. DEMINGS

JANUARY 9, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4581 RH

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop 

best practices for utilizing advanced passenger information and passenger name record data for counterterrorism screening and vetting operations, and for other 

purposes. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4581 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Screening and Vetting 

5 Passenger Exchange Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PASSENGER SCREENING BEST PRACTICES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Home9 land Security shall develop best practices for utilizing ad10 vanced passenger information and passenger name record 

11 data for counterterrorism screening and vetting oper12 ations. 

13 (b) CONSIDERATIONS.—The Secretary of Homeland 

14 Security shall, to the greatest extent practicable— 

15 (1) make available to certain countries, includ16 ing visa waiver program countries under section 217 

17 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

18 1187), the best practices required under subsection 

19 (a); and 

20 (2) provide assistance to such countries in im21 plementing such best practices. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 367 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4581 

[Report No. 115–493] 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to 

operations, and for other purposes. data for counterterrorism screening and vetting senger information and passenger name record develop best practices for utilizing advanced pasJANUARY 9, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS