alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1450]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           IN RECOGNITION OF THE UNITED WAY OF DENTON COUNTY

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. MICHAEL C. BURGESS

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                       Monday, September 10, 2012

  Mr. BURGESS. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the United Way of 
Denton County and their 61 years of service. The local chapter aims to 
improve the quality of life in the critical areas of education, income, 
and health. The organization estimates that more the 33,000 students in 
the area are at risk of dropping out of school and approximately 15% of 
the County's adults over the age of 24 did not graduate from high 
school. Furthermore, the Texas Food Bank estimates that more than 
90,000 individuals in Denton County are food insecure, and the Texas 
Department of State Health Services reports that $713 million dollars 
were spent on preventable hospitalizations over a four-year period in 
the county.
  The United Way of Denton County and partner agency volunteers and 
donors decided they could overcome these discouraging statistics. 
Volunteers donated 221,000 hours, valuing a $4.8 million staff cost 
savings in 2011. Through the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance program, 
United Way of Denton County staff and volunteers have generated more 
than $1,782,899 in Federal Tax Returns to Denton County residents since 
2007. In addition, to improve the area's quality of life, 7,361 donors 
gave a total of $1,562,851 to the United Way of Denton County in 2011.
  The organization's worthwhile efforts have positively impacted the 
communities it serves, offering assistance to more than 4,500 Denton 
County residents through United Way of Denton County and their non-
profit partner agencies. With the support of the citizens of Denton 
County, the United Way will continue to flourish and unite the 
community through its mission of improving lives by affording 
individuals and organizations opportunities to give, advocate, and 
volunteer. It is my pleasure to recognize the United Way of Denton 
County and their 61 years of service, and I am privileged to represent 
them in the U.S. House of Representatives.

                          ____________________
```
July 14 , 2015

Mr. Ron Davison

4265 Chickadee Circle

Jackson, WY 83001

Dear Mr. Davison :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your July 1 st 2015 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

-

2628 ), but we are unable to process your request any fur ther. The information you sent does

no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; th at is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier t o reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

Please use the Comment Now Button on the Regulations.gov page to upload any add itional

information to the public docket.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

S incerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst

, Airmen and

Airport Rules Division

Enclosure3
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES—OXLEY ACT OF 2004**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Bancshares California (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel L. Erickson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof and for the periods covered in the Report. 

 

 

Date: August 15, 2005

 

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of the written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Alliance Bancshares California and will beretained by Alliance Bancshares California and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

The foregoing certifications being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-QSB and shall not be considered as part of the Form10-QSB.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 1513** 

DENNIS CROFT , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Glen E. Conrad , Chief District Judge. ( 7:11

- cv - 00277

- GEC

- RSB )

Submitted : December 27, 2012 Decided: January 24, 2013

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
John M. Loeschen, JOHN M. LOESCHEN LAW OFFICES, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Timothy Ross Spencer, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF ROANOKE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circu it.2 PER CURIAM: Dennis Croft, a former captain with the City of Roanoke Fire/EMS Department, appeals the district court ’ s order granting the City of Roanoke’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have

rev iewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment for the reasons stated by the district
court in its memorandum opinion
. See Croft v. City of Roanoke,
Va. , No. 7:11

- cv - 00277

- GEC

- RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 22, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section
1350, as adopted), Stephen S. Schwartz, the Chief Executive Officer and
President of Asyst Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), and David L. White, the
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies that, to their knowledge:

     1. The Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2003, as amended, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1
(the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
periods covered by the Periodic Report and the results of operations of the
Company for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.

     In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the
29th day of October, 2003.

/s/ Stephen S. Schwartz                      /s/ David L. White
--------------------------------------       -----------------------------------
Stephen S. Schwartz,                         David L. White,
President and Chief Executive Officer        Senior Vice President and
                                             Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT JUNE 30, 1998 FOR THE
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000909120
<NAME>              SWANSEA REAL ESTATE
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,866
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                       168
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,689
<PP&E>                                          25,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,966
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            65
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,421
<SALES>                                         31,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,153
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,924
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,456
<INCOME-TAX>                                       265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,191
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1



Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 11, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Landrys Restaurants, Inc. (the Company) included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 into the following:



|I. |  | The Companys Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-75886) relating to the Companys shelf registration statement.
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|II. |  | The Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-93173) relating to the Companys Amended and Restated 1995 Flexible Incentive Plan.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|III. |  | The Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-02862) relating to the Companys Stock Option Plan.
|---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|IV. |  | The Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-02854) relating to the 1995 Flexible Spending Plan.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|V. |  | The Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 033-81007) relating to the 1993 Stock Option Plan.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|VI. |  | The Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 033-76500) relating to the 1993 Stock Option Plan and Nonqualified Formula Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Houston, Texas

March 9, 2004
EE-RM-STO-01-375 COMMENT 24A 

® u.s. Department or E'IIergy 

. ; . Enerw EfficieRql and Renewable Energy 

EERE Home 

Search Help More Searc 

EERE Information Center 

Appliances Home 

About Standards 

Laws & Regulations 

Information Resources 

Notices & Rules 

Priority Setting 

Public Workshops & 

Hearings 

Useful Links 

Commercial Products 

Distribution Transformers 

Electric Motors 

Furnaces & Boilers 

High Intensity Discharge 

Lamps 

Small Electric Motors 

Unitary Air Conditioners 

& Heat Pumps 

Water Heaters 

Residential Products 

Commercial Unitary Air 

Conditioners and Heat Pumps 

ANOPR Internet Webcast 

Date: August 12, 2004 

Time: 1:00p.m. to 4:00p.m. EDT 

Purpose: The webcast was a live, on-line training presentation 

intended to familiarize interested stakeholders with the approach 

and analytical tools used in the ANOPR analyses. The on-line 

training presentation was held before the ANOPR public meeting 

to assist stakeholder review of the documents and spreadsheets. 

By explaining how to use the spreadsheets prior to the public 

meeting, the Department hoped to free-up more time at the 

meeting for stakeholder input and discussion. 

Materials: The slides from the August 12 webcast are available 

here. (PDF 2.8 MB). 

EJ Printable Version 

Webmaster I Security & Privacy I Building Technologies Program Home I EERE Home 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Content Last Updated: 08/16/2004
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5869]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              THE JOURNAL

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair has examined the Journal of the 
last day's proceedings and announces to the House his approval thereof.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal stands approved.

                          ____________________
```
# White - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Georgia Mountains Regional Commission Executive Director Heather Feldman Email &#104;f&#101;l&#100;m&#x61;n&#x40;g&#x6d;r&#x63;&#46;&#x67;a&#x2e;g&#x6f;vThe post Georgia Mountains Regional Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5922]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. McNERNEY: 
       H.R. 6378.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article I, section 8 of the United States Constitution.
```
# C_2008128EN.01001802.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/18

---

Action brought on 12 February 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-50/08)

(2008/C 128/31)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J.-P. Keppenne and M H. Støvlbæk, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by laying down a nationality requirement for access to the profession of notary, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty, in particular Articles 43 EC and 45 EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by laying down a nationality requirement for access to the profession of notary, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty, in particular Articles 43 EC and 45 EC;

| — | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By its action, the Commission alleges that the defendant, by laying down a nationality requirement for access to the profession of notary and its practice, disproportionately restricts the freedom of establishment laid down in Article 43 EC. Admittedly, Article 45 EC exempts from the application of the chapter relating to the right of establishment activities connected directly and specifically with the exercise of public authority. According to the Commission, the tasks entrusted to notaries under French law are so distantly connected to the exercise of public authority that they do not fall within the scope of that article or warrant such a restriction of the freedom of establishment.

First, those tasks do not in fact confer on notaries a genuine power of coercion and the respective rights and duties of a judge and notary are completely separate.

Secondly, less restrictive measures than a nationality requirement could be laid down by the national legislature, such as subjecting the operators concerned to strict conditions for access to the profession, specific professional duties and/or a specific test.

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1365]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                  _____
                                 

                          HON. JOSE E. SERRANO

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                         Tuesday, July 31, 2012

  Mr. SERRANO. Mr. Speaker, on rollcall No. 531 I inadvertently voted 
``aye'' when I intended to vote ``no'' on the Fitzpatrick Amendment to 
H.R. 4078. I would like the record to reflect this error, and to 
reiterate my opposition to efforts to undermine the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 
of 2002. Sarbanes-Oxley has been an important bill that improves 
corporate transparency and helps to ensure confidence in our financial 
markets, and I continue to support this vital legislation.

                          ____________________
```
|                                                  |   |   |                                                        |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ G. Richard Smith                                  |   |   | /s/ Gary R. Smith                                           |
| G. Richard SmithPresident and Chief Executive Officer |   |   | Gary R. SmithSecretary/Treasurer andChief Financial Officer |
|  Date: May 24, 2010                         |   |   |  Date: May 24, 2010                               |

----

| * This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing. |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
# C_2009193EN.01003503.xml

| 15.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/35

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 11 June 2009 — Ketselidou v Commission

(Case F-81/08) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Action - Judgment of a Community court - Substantial new fact - None)

2009/C 193/59

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Zoe Ketselidou (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. A. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Martin and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the implicit decision rejecting the applicant's request for revision of the calculation of the pension annuities to be taken into account for the transfer of pension rights acquired in Greece to the Community scheme.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application is dismissed as manifestly unfounded; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as manifestly unfounded;

| 2. | Ms Ketselidou is ordered to pay the costs in their entirety. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Ketselidou is ordered to pay the costs in their entirety.

---

(1)  OJ C 313 of 6.12.2008, p. 59.

1

---
While much of Appalachia has lost

population since

2010, Southern 

Appalachia’s

population has 

grown 4.7%.

POPULATION

APPALACHIA’S

DATA SNAPSHOT

Minorities make up a

small but growing 

share of Appalachia’s 

population.

Appalachia’s median age is 

higher than the nation’s. 38.0

YEARS

Find more data on this and other topics at www.arc.gov/chartbook

Among Appalachia’s minority 

populations, African Americans are

the largest group, while Hispanics/

Latinos are the fastest-growing.

APPALACHIA U.S.

40.9 

YEARS

9.7% 4.9% 3.6%

18.2% 38.7% African Americans Hispanics/Latinos Other

APPALACHIA U.S.

Up from 9.2%

in 2010

Up from 4.2%

in 2010

Up from 3.0%

in 2010

Use The Appalachian Region: A Data Overview from the 2012–2016 American Community Survey—also known as the 

Chartbook—to discover more about Appalachia’s population. Authored by the Population Reference Bureau with the 

Appalachian Regional Commission, the Chartbook features data on income, employment, education, and other 

indicators at the regional, subregional, state, and county levels, and examines data change over recent years to show 

trends. The Chartbook’s population analysis compares data from 2016 and 2010 U.S. Census Bureau estimates.

25.6 million people live in Appalachia’s 

420 counties. Since 2010, 

Appalachia’s

population has 

grown 1%; 

the nation’s

has grown 4.5%.

 Up from 16.4% in 2010 Up from 36.2% in 2010

-2.2%

-1.8%

-0.5%

+4.7%

+2.6%

POPULATION CHANGE POPULATION CHANGE BY SUBREGION

MINORITY POPULATION MINORITY POPULATION BY GROUP

MEDIAN AGE