,

,



# The Attorney General of Texas October 24, 1979 MARK WHITE Attorney General
Honorable Lee Drain Texas State University System 505Sam Houston Building Austin, Texas 78701 Opinion No.NW-76 Re: Coordinating Board approval of construction project for Southwest Texas State University. Dear Mr.Drain: Youinform us that onJanuary 26,1977, the Coordinating Board, Texas College and University System, approved construction ofPhase IIofa MultiPurpose Building on the campus of Southwest Texas State University. The Coordinating Board gave its approval under section 61.058of the Education Code which at that time didnot authorize it to consider cost ofconstruction projects in giving its approval. See Attorney General Opinion H-762 (1976). Thereafter the legislature amended section 61.058(8)(A) of the Education Code to provide that the Coordinating Board could consider “cost factors and the financial implications” if the total cost of the project exceeded $500,000. The cost of the building exceeds this figure. This amendment became effective approximately seven months after the Coordinating Board approved Phase II. The Commissioner ofHigher Education subsequently sent to the colleges and universities a memorandum containing the following language: If bids on a project approved by the Coordinating

Board exceed cost estimates by more than ten percent or reduce square footage projections by more than ten percent, then the proposed project is subject to another review bythe Board. Bids on the Phase IIproject have exceeded cost estimates by more than ten percent. Based onthese facts, you ashthe following question:

Does the Board of Regents, Texas State University System, have authority to award a construction contract for the Multi-Purpose Building, Phase II, which exceeds cost estimates by more than ten percent, without another review by the Coordinating Board?

P. 231Honorable Lee Drain - Page Two (NW-761

The memorandum requiring a resubmission of projects when the bids exceed the anticipated cost by more than ten percent isnot arule or regulation of the Coordinating Board. It is merely apart of the application which colleges and universities are required to submit to the Coordinating Board when they seek approval ofbuilding projects. It was first used September 2, 1977, more than seven months after the Southwest Texas State University project was approved. While the requirement set out in the application could serve to condition approval granted after September 2, 1977,it &es not purport to affect applications approved prior to that time. Since the requirement for resubmission appears only in the application for approval, there is no necessity to determine whether the Board could require projects approved before September 2, 1977,to be presented to it again for additional review. Accordingly, there was no requirement that the Southwest Texas project be resubmitted to the Board. Even if the Coordinating Board could withdraw its prior approval, it has not done so here. The October 19,1979,motion to approve the project was defeated by a tie vote. While the tie vote caused the motion to approve to fail, it did not result ina disapproval ofthe project or awithdrawal ofthe 1977approval. Accordingly, the 1977approval is still effective, and the Board ofRegents ofthe Texas State University System has authority to award aconstruction project onthe basis ofthe Coordinating Board’s 1977action. SUMMARY The Regents of the Texas State University System may award a construction contract based on Coordinating Board approval of the project secured inJanuary, 1977.Very truly yours,

Attorney General ofTexas JOHN W.FAINTER, JR. First Assistant Attorney General TEDL.HARTLEY Executive Assistant Attorney General Prepared bySusan Garrison and C. Robert Heath Assistant Attorneys General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE C.Robert Heath, Chairman David B.Brooks

P. 232Honorable Lee Drain - Page Three (MW-76)

BobGammage Susan Garrison EvaLoutzenhiser Richard Rafes William GReid Bruce Youngblood

p. 233