alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, dated the date of this Certification (the Report), I, John J. Limbert, the President and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 20, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN J. LIMBERT               
|                     |  |  |  | John J. Limbert                      
|                     |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



66
exv10w4



 








EXHIBIT 10.4




PLEDGE AMENDMENT




     This Pledge Amendment, dated March 31, 2005, is delivered pursuant to
Section 6(d) of the Pledge Agreement referred to below. All defined terms
herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto or incorporated by reference in
the Pledge Agreement. The undersigned hereby certifies that the
representations and warranties in Section 5 of the Pledge Agreement are and
continue to be true and correct, both as to the promissory notes, instruments
and shares pledged prior to this Pledge Amendment and as to the promissory
notes, instruments and shares pledged pursuant to this Pledge Amendment. The
undersigned further agrees that this Pledge Amendment may be attached to that
certain Pledge Agreement, dated August 1, 2002, between undersigned, as
Pledgor, and General Electric Capital Corporation, as Agent (the “Pledge
Agreement”) and that the Pledged Shares and Pledged Indebtedness listed on this
Pledge Amendment shall be and become a part of the Pledged Collateral referred
to in said Pledge Agreement and shall secure all Secured Obligations referred
to in said Pledge Agreement. The undersigned acknowledges that any promissory
notes, instruments or shares not included in the Pledged Collateral at the
discretion of Agent may not otherwise be pledged by Pledgor to any other Person
or otherwise used as security for any obligations other than the Secured
Obligations.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	NAVARRE CORPORATION, as Pledgor

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
James G. Gilbertson	 
	 	 	Name:  	James G. Gilbertson 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chief Financial Officer 	 
	 




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Percentage of
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Class	 	Certificate	 	 	 	 	 	Outstanding
	Name and of Pledgor	 	Pledged Entity	 	of Stock	 	Number(s)	 	Number of Shares	 	Shares
	Navarre Corporation
	 	Encore Software, Inc.	 	Common	 	 	4	 	 	 	20,000	 	 	 	20	%






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Initial	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Maker/Obligor	 	Principal Amount	 	Issue Date	 	Maturity Date	     	Interest Rate
Filed 10/14/98 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

1998 ND 182

State of North Dakota,Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Joseph M. Klein,Defendant and Appellant

Criminal No. 980168

Appeal from the District Court for Emmons County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald L. Jorgensen, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Jonathan R. Byers, Assistant Attorney General, Attorney General’s Office, P.O. Box 1054, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-1054, for plaintiff and appellee.

David N. Ogren of Herr & Ogren, P.O. Box 67, Wishek, N.D. 58495-0067, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Klein

Criminal No. 980168

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Joseph Klein appeals from the district court’s order revoking probation and increasing the length of Klein’s incarceration, as allowed by N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-07(6).  Klein’s appeal is without merit, and a previous controlling appellate decision, State v. Lindgren, 483 N.W.2d 777, 778 (N.D. 1992), is dispositive of the appeal.  Therefore, we affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring

[¶3]Because of a vacancy on the Court at the time of hearing and decision, this case was decided by four Justices.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ZBB Energy Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Eric C. Apfelbach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, to my knowledge, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ZBB Energy Corporation and will be retained by ZBB Energy
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





/s/  Eric C.
      ApfelbachEric
      C. ApfelbachFebruary
      17, 2010
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
#### In the Matter of Nichole B. Kempleton N., Sr., Respondent-Appellant; Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York, Appellant-Respondent; Lenore Gittis, Appellant.

— In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York appeals, and the Law Guardian for the child separately appeals, from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Palmer, J.), dated March 6, 1991, which, upon a fact-finding order dated September 12, 1990, made after a hearing, *inter alia,*finding that Kempleton N., Sr., had sexually abused the child Nichole B., *inter alia,*permitted Kempleton N., Sr., to return to the family home. Kempleton N., Sr., appeals from the fact-finding order dated September 12,1990.

Ordered that the appeal from the fact-finding order dated September 12, 1990, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order of disposition dated March 6, 1991 *(see, Matter of Linda K.,*132 AD2d 149); and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition is modified by deleting therefrom the provision permitting Kempleton N., Sr., to return to the family home, and adding thereto a provision excluding Kempleton N., Sr., from the family home for a period of one year; as so modified, the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We find that the Family Court’s finding that Kempleton N., Sr., had sexually abused the child Nichole B. is supported by a preponderance of the evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing *(see, Matter of Nicole V.,*71 NY2d 112, 117; *Matter of Tammie Z.,*66 NY2d 1, 3).

The Family Court’s determination to allow Kempleton N., Sr., to return to the family home did not sufficiently account for the best interests of the abused child *(see, Matter of Star Leslie W.,*63 NY2d 136, 147; *Matter of Valerie Leonice T.,*107 AD2d 327). The testimony adduced at the dispositional hearing revealed that the child’s mother did not believe that Kempleton N., Sr., abused her daughter, despite the daughter’s earlier testimony at the fact-finding hearing detailing repeated occasions of sexual abuse by him, and the opinion of a child abuse expert that the child’s reports of the abuse had not been fabricated. A social worker also testified that she did *206not know whether the child’s mother would protect her from further abuse.

In such circumstances, where there has been a finding of sexual abuse, the "safer course” is not to return the child to the abusive parent *(Matter of Zariyasta S.,*158 AD2d 45, 47, quoting *Matter of Ruth McI.,*140 AD2d 255). Since we find that it would not be in the child’s best interests to live with Kempleton N., Sr., prior to his engaging in therapy, we modify the dispositional order to exclude Kempleton N., Sr., from the home for a one-year period, during which time he must undergo a course of therapy in accordance with the remainder of the dispositional order. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
# C_2008158EN.01001302.xml

| 21.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/13

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 21 April 2008 — Iaszlo Hadadi (Hadady) v Csilla Marta Mesko, married name Hadadi (Hadady)

(Case C-168/08)

(2008/C 158/20)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Laszlo Hadadi (Hadady)

Applicant:

Defendant: Csilla Marta Mesko, married name Hadadi (Hadady)

Defendant:

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 3(1)(b) [of Regulation No 2201/2003] (1) to be interpreted as meaning that, in a situation where the spouses hold both the nationality of the State of the court seised and the nationality of another Member State of the European Union, the nationality of the State of the court seised must prevail? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 3(1)(b) [of Regulation No 2201/2003] (1) to be interpreted as meaning that, in a situation where the spouses hold both the nationality of the State of the court seised and the nationality of another Member State of the European Union, the nationality of the State of the court seised must prevail?

1

| 2. | If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative, is that provision to be interpreted as referring, in a situation where the spouses each hold dual nationality of the same two Member States, to the more dominant of the two nationalities? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative, is that provision to be interpreted as referring, in a situation where the spouses each hold dual nationality of the same two Member States, to the more dominant of the two nationalities?

| 3. | If the answer to Question 2 is in the negative, should it therefore be considered that that provision offers the spouses an additional option, allowing those spouses the choice of seising the courts of either of the two States of which they both hold the nationality? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If the answer to Question 2 is in the negative, should it therefore be considered that that provision offers the spouses an additional option, allowing those spouses the choice of seising the courts of either of the two States of which they both hold the nationality?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1).

1

---
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Byron Webb, certify that:

     1. I have  reviewed  this  annual  report on Form  10-KSB of Webb  Mortgage
Depot, Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a  material  fact or omit to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. I am responsible for  establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls
and  procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:

     a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  changes in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

     5. I have  disclosed,  based  on our most  recent  evaluation  of  internal
control over financial  reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit
committee of the  registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent functions):

     a) All significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: April 15, 2005.


                               /s/ Byron Webb
                              -----------------------------
                               Name: Byron Webb
                               Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 21 to Buckhead America Corporation
                          December 31, 1999 Form 10-KSB

                          BUCKHEAD AMERICA CORPORATION
                            (A Delaware Corporation)

                              SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
                             As of December 31, 1999


                              Delaware Corporations

                               BLM Virginia, Inc.
                                 BLM Prime, Inc.
                            CHI - Sandy Springs, Inc.
                           BAC Hotel Management, Inc.
                              BLM EB Orlando, Inc.
                                  BLM EB, Inc.
                                 CHI Dixie, Inc.
                              BLM EB Daytona, Inc.
                                   BLM-F, Inc.
                                  BLM-RH, Inc.
                                  BLM-RF, Inc.
                              BAC Franchising Inc.


                                Texas Corportion

                         Country Hearth Inns/Texas, Inc.


                               Georgia Corporation

                       Country Hearth Inns - Dalton, Inc.

                                Ohio Corporations

                          The Lodge Keeper Group, Inc.
                 Integrated Motel Management Group of Ohio, Inc.
                                  HOMANCO, Inc.
                             LKG Development I, Inc.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-51430, 333-30344 and 333-50470), on Form S-4
(No. 333-50836) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-65923 and 333-53446) of Hanover
Compressor Company of our report dated March 8, 2000, except as to the stock
split described in Note 16 which is as of June 14, 2000, and except for Note 18
as to which the date is February 1, 2001, relating to the consolidated financial
statements, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.


                                /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Houston, Texas
February 2, 2001
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Temporary Financial Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Brad E. Herr, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

/s/ Brad E. Herr
---------------------------------------
Brad E. Herr
Chief Financial Officer
October 18, 2004
H. R. 446 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric project. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period specified 

in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 

otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

project numbered 12737, the Commission may, at the request of 

the licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the Commission’s procedures under that 

section, extend the time period during which the licensee is required 

to commence the construction of the project for up to 3 consecutive 

2-year periods from the date of the expiration of the extension 

originally issued by the Commission. 

(b) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the period 

required for commencement of construction of the project described 

in subsection (a) has expired prior to the date of the enactment 

of this Act, the Commission may reinstate the license for the project 

effective as of the date of its expiration and the first extension 

authorized under subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of 

such expiration. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


August 27, 2003

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not to
be deemed to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, does not
constitute a part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as amended, (the
"Report") accompanying this letter and is not to be incorporated by reference
into any filing, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of
any general incorporation language in such filing.

I, Richard J. Pershing, the Chief Executive Officer of Mirant Americas
Generation, LLC (the "Company"), certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



/s/ RICHARD J. PERSHING
-------------------------------------
Name: Richard J. Pershing
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2008158EN.01002203.xml

| 21.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/22

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 29 April 2008 — Republic of Cyprus v Commission

(Case T-54/08) (1)

1

(2008/C 158/38)

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 29.3.2008.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant
to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned, being the Principal Financial Officer of Enbridge
Energy Partners, L.P. (the Partnership), hereby certifies that the Partnerships Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 (the Quarterly Report), filed with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 4, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    MARK A. MAKI                                              
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Mark A. Maki Vice
PresidentFinance (Principal Financial Officer)