alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary


 Exhibit 10.45 
  
 Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary 
  
 Boston Life Sciences, Inc.’s (the “Company’s”) non-employee directors currently consist of: (i) Robert
S. Langer, Jr.; (ii) Michael J. Mullen; and (iii) John T. Preston. On October 28, 2004, Robert L. Gipson resigned from the Board of Directors. Messr. Gipson declined to receive any cash or stock compensation during the term of his service. Effective
July 1, 2004, non-employee directors of the Company received an annual retainer, payable in monthly installments, and an additional fee for each board or committee meeting attended in person or telephonically. All non-employee directors are
reimbursed for ordinary and reasonable expenses of attending any board or committee meetings. The table below sets forth the annual retainer, per board meeting fees and annual fees per committee chaired paid to our non-employee directors in 2004:

  

									
	 	  	2004 Annual Retainer

	  	Board Meeting
Fees

	  	Annual Fee Per Committee
Chaired


	 Robert S. Langer, Jr.
	  	$	8,334	  	$	12,000	  	None
	 Michael J. Mullen
	  	$	8,334	  	$	9,500	  	None
	 John T. Preston
	  	$	8,334	  	$	9,500	  	None

  
 Effective May 30,
2004, each new non-employee director is automatically granted an option to purchase 5,000 shares of Company’s common stock (“New Director Options”) upon election or appointment (the “Automatic Grant Date”). The exercise
price of any New Director Options granted shall equal the fair market value of shares of the Company’s common stock subject thereto on the Automatic Grant Date. Subject to provisions regarding expiration and termination of options, New Director
Options become exercisable as to 50% of the shares of the Company’s common stock subject thereto on the Automatic Grant Date and become exercisable as to an additional 25% of the shares of the Company’s common stock issuable upon exercise
there of on each of the first and second anniversaries of such Automatic Grant Date. New Director Options terminate ten years after the date of grant. Upon their election to the Board in June 2004, Messrs. Mullen and Preston were each granted
options to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock under this policy with an exercise price of $5.00 per share.
**Exhibit 10.69.1**

 

**AMENDMENT #1 To AGREEMENT**

 

**BETWEEN**

** **

**ADVANCED CELL TECHNOLOGY**

 

**AND THE**

 

**UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS/AMHERST**

 

Thisis amendment #1 to this existing agreement dated 12-01-99**by and between the above named parties.

 

Theparties agree to the changes as follows:

 

ARTICLE6.l.**Term. This Agreement shall commence on September 1, 2000 andshall remain in effect**for a period of 3 years, unlessearlier terminated in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.

 

EXHIBITB. Sponsor Contributions. Please amend this Exhibit to include the followingpayment schedule:

 

Sponsorwill make payments of $1061.60 on the 1st of each month of the project period: 9/1/2000 through 8/31/2003.

 

Allother terms and conditions of the Agreement and Amendment #1, shall remain ineffect unless otherwise specifically provided herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theparties hereto have executed the Agreement Amendment as of 12-12-00, 2000.

 

THEUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS

 

 

By

CarolSprague, Acting Associate Director

Officeof Grant and Contract Administration

 

 
| ADVANCED  CELL TECHNOLOGY |              |
|---------------------------|-------------------|
|                      |              |
|                      |              |
| By:                       | /s/  Jose Cibelli |  12-12-00 |   |
|                           |                   |  |  |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 2, 2016

a0125 

# Order

Clerk February 2, 2016

150397(86)

EBONY WHITE, Conservator for MA’KIERAN

MOSS, Minor,

Plaintiff

- Appellee/Cross

- Appellant,

v SC: 150397

COA: 304221

Wayne CC: 08

- 106604

- NH

HUTZEL WOMEN’S HOSPITAL, a/k/a

HARPER

- HUTZEL HOSPITAL,

Defendant

- Appellant/

Cross

- Appellee,

and

SUSAN BERMAN, M.D., NICOLE MAHONEY,

M.D. and SHUKRI ABDULLAH, M.D.,

Defendants.

__________________ _______________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September

25, 2015 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order

was entered erroneously.
NO. 06-14-00138-CR

JAMIE LEE BLEDSOE, § IN THE SIXTH

VS. § COURT OF APPEALS

THE STATE OF TEXAS § TEXARKANA, TEXAS

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS APPELLANT’S ATTORNEY

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: 

NOW COMES Movant EBB B. MOBLEY, appointed attorney of record for JAMIE LEE

BLEDSOE, Appellant herein , and files this Motion to Withdraw as Appellant’s Attorney, and in

support thereof would show the Court as follows:

§

Movant was appointed as stand by counsel to represent Appellant JAMIE LEE BLEDSOE

prior to a hearing in the trial court on the defendant’s Motion For New Trial. The motion was

denied. Movant perfected appeal to this Court by timely filing a docketing statement, designation

of record, CR-230, notice letter to the trial court reporter, CR-221, and notice of appeal, CR-226. 

 .

§

On review of the Clerk’s Record and the Reporter’s Record, Movant has concluded that this

appeal is without merit and frivolous. Accordingly Movant has this day filed an Anders Brief 

summarizing the record and possible issues that could be raised. 

§

Movant has provided JAMIE LEE BLEDSOE with a copy of this motion, the Anders Brief,

the Clerk’s Record and the Reporter’s Record, by United States mail return receipt requested.

ACCEPTED

06-14-00138-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

12/31/2014 12:18:13 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 1/8/2015 1:13:00 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
WHEREFORE, premises considered, Movant prays that his motion to withdraw be granted.

Respectfully submitted,

EBB B. MOBLEY

Attorney at Law

422 North Center Street-Lower Level

P. O. Box 2309

Longview, TX 75606

Telephone: (903) 757-3331

Facsimile: (903) 753-8289

ebbmob@aol.com

 /s/ EBB B. MOBLEY 

EBB B. MOBLEY

Attorney for Appellant

State Bar License # 14238000

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of this motion is being provided to Timothy T. Cariker, Assistant District Attorney,

200 West Houston, Suite 206, Marshall, Texas 75670, on the 31 day of December, 2014 by email

and to Jamie Lee Bledsoe, Inmate 1945574, Wynne Unit, 810 FM 2821, Huntsville, Texas 77349

by U.S. Mail. 

 /s/ EBB B. MOBLEY 

EBB B. MOBLEY
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5772]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER

  The SPEAKER. The Chair will entertain up to 15 requests for 1-minute 
speeches on each side of the aisle.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4499 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4499

To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
    to set the rate of pay for employees of the Bureau of Consumer 
     Financial Protection in accordance with the General Schedule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 30, 2017

  Mr. Duffy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
    to set the rate of pay for employees of the Bureau of Consumer 
     Financial Protection in accordance with the General Schedule.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CFPB Pay Fairness Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. RATE OF PAY FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL 
              PROTECTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 1013(a)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street 
Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5493(a)(2)) is amended to 
read as follows:
            ``(2) Compensation.--The rates of basic pay for all 
        employees of the Bureau shall be set and adjusted by the 
        Director in accordance with the General Schedule set forth in 
        section 5332 of title 5, United States Code.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to service by an employee of the Bureau of Consumer Financial 
Protection following the 90-day period beginning on the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5765]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            By Mr. BACA:
        H.R. 6366.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3; and Article 1, Section 8, 
     Clause 18.
```
#### Mary L. Austin, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Michael Austin, Deceased, Respondent, v Canbar Associates, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

— In an action to recover the down payment deposited pursuant to a contract to purchase real property, the defendant seller appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered September 26, 1989, which, upon an order of the same court entered August 18, 1989, granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, is in favor of the plaintiff and against the appellant in the principal sum of $10,000. Justice Sullivan has been substituted for former Justice Brown *(see,*22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

*196Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Mary Lou Austin and her husband Michael Austin entered into a contract for the purchase of a condominium unit being built by the defendant Canbar Associates, Inc. (hereinafter Canbar). Pursuant to its express terms, the parties’ contract provided that it was the responsibility of Canbar to obtain a mortgage commitment for the plaintiff. The mortgage contingency clause provided that "[i]f Purchaser’s application for a mortgage is not approved within forty-five (45) days from the date hereof, then this agreement shall be deemed cancelled and the monies paid hereunder by Purchaser shall be refunded with interest, if any, and the parties shall be released from any liability hereunder except that seller reserves the right for a period of thirty (30) days to grant the mortgage loan itself on the same terms and conditions”. It is undisputed that Canbar failed to obtain or offer a mortgage commitment to the purchaser within the time period specified in the contract *(see, Cerabino Custom Bldrs. v Rigoglioso,*135 AD2d 481).

"A familiar and eminently sensible proposition of law is that, when parties set down their agreement in a clear, complete document, their writing should as a rule be enforced according to its terms” *(W.W.W. Assocs. v Giancontieri,*77 NY2d 157, 162). It is well established that when the terms of a written contract are clear and unambiguous, the intent must be found therein. Thus, in cases where the intention of the parties is expressed in plain and unambiguous terms, the question is one of law which may be decided on a motion for summary judgment *(see, Oak Bee Corp. v Blankman & Co.,*154 AD2d 3). In the present case, the contract, read as a whole to determine its purpose and intent *(see, W. W. W. Assocs. v Giancontieri, supra,*at 162), plainly manifests the intention of the parties that the contract "be deemed cancelled” should a mortgage not be granted within 75 days. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment and the return of her down payment since the defendant failed to secure or offer a mortgage within the time expressed in the agreement. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Sullivan and Eiber, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Brown, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant correctly contends that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that the individual who purchased drugs from him was his accomplice *(see,*CPL 60.22; *People v Arnott,*143 AD2d 761, 763; *People v Webster,*123 AD2d 488; *People v Tune,*103 AD2d 990, 991-992). Inas*584much as defense counsel failed to object to the court’s charge, that issue has not been preserved for our review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). Because defendant’s conviction did not rest substantially on the accomplice’s testimony, we decline to consider this error as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6]; *cf., People v Strawder,*124 AD2d 758, 759).

The remaining contentions raised by defendant have not been preserved for appellate review and we decline to reach them in the interest of justice. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
# C_2008158EN.01002603.xml

| 21.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/26

---

Action brought on 31 March 2008 — Liotti v Commission

(Case F-38/08)

(2008/C 158/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Amerigo Liotti (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the applicant's career development report for the period from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2006.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the applicant's career development report (REC/CDR) for the reference period 1.1.2006 to 31.12.2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the applicant's career development report (REC/CDR) for the reference period 1.1.2006 to 31.12.2006;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
**Exhibit 23.3****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-38613, 333-55078,333-104294, 333-105141, 333-126125 and 333-142537) and Form S-8(File Nos. 033-84510, 333-14155, 333-27201, 333-27203,333-27205, 333-60333 and 333-123829) of Colonial Properties Trust ofour report dated February 29, 2008, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements of OZ/CLP Retail and Subsidiaries, which appearsin this Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopersBirmingham, Alabama
SERVED : MARC H 13 , 201 2 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N'ir M )

OFFIC EO FHEARING S . : i . : . ' WASHINGTON , D C I NTH EMATTE RO F BUTT ESTEE L& FABRICATION , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B EASSIGNED ]

(Civi l Penalty Action ) FDMS NO . FAA-2012-019 9 NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No . 2011WP700141 ) ha s bee nassigne d t o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . All fliture pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do nth e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r

person s o n th e attache dServic e List .

Lonni e A . Yode r Chie f Administrativ e L Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFDMS No . FAA-2012-019 9 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ^

ON ECOP Y Butt e Stee l & Fabrication , Inc . Attn : Jef f Brochheuser , Presiden t 1329 0 Contractor s Driv e Chico , C A 9597 3 TEL : 530-893-111 3 FAX ; 530-893-301 4 Christophe r

Merrill , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

Regiona l Counse l Western-Pacifi c Region , AWP-7. 3 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 90009-200 7 TEL ; 310-725-710 5 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL ; 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Staf

f Assistant/Paralega l FAX ; 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i nperso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio nAdministration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue , S . W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2 WIOOO , Washington

, D C 20591 , Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430. -2 -
**EXHIBIT 32.1**Certification     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), Stephen S.Schwartz, Chief Executive Officer of Asyst Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), and Michael Sicuro,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:     1. The Company’s Quarterly Report for the period ended December 31, 2007, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or section 15( d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated: February 1, 2008         /S/ STEPHEN S. SCHWARTZ Stephen S. Schwartz, Ph.D. /S/ MICHAEL A. SICURO Michael A. Sicuro  Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer  This certification is not deemed to be “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification is notdeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporatesit by reference.
================================================================================

                                  Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tari Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the  period  ended June 30,  2004 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the financial  condition and results of  operations of the
        Company.



Date:  July 29, 2004

                                                /s/ Theodore Tsagkaris
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Theodore Tsagkaris
                                                President, C.E.O. and Director
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 10.1


                                   ASSIGNMENT

         THIS ASSIGNMENT is executed to be effective as of the 30th day of
March, 2005, by HomeNet Communications, Inc. ("Assignor"), in favor of HomeNet
Northwest, Inc. ("Assignee").

         A. Assignor has been providing retail internet services to retail
customers in Grant County, Washington (the "Customers").

         B. Assignor is no longer going to be providing internet services to
Customers as result of (i) the discision of the Grant County Public Utility
District (the "District") to discontinue the fiber build out and sell the video
head end, (ii) demand by the District for Assignor to pay a substantial deposit
and (iii) other factors.

         C. Assignee would like to continue providing internet services (not
including video services) to the Customers.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

         1. Assignment of Customers. Assignor hereby assigns, conveys, transfers
and sets over to Assignee any and all of Assignor's transferable right, title,
interest, powers, and privileges in and to provide internet services to the
Customers. Assignor makes no representation or warranty with respect to the
transferability of any such rights, title, interest, powers or privileges.
Assignee hereby accepts such assignment.

         2. Successors and Assigns. This assignment shall inure to the benefit
of, and be binding upon, the successors, executors, administrators, legal
representatives and assigns of the parties hereto.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Assignment to be
effective as of the date set forth above.


HOMENET COMMUNICATIONS, INC.                  HOMENET NORTHWEST, INC.


By  /s/ Kelly Ryan                            By  /s/ Jason Pattison
   ---------------------------------             -------------------------------
   Kelly Ryan, CEO                               Jason Pattison, President