alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Email Real Estate.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dan OMeara, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 2, 2004                                     
|                                                       
|/s/ Dan OMeara                                        
|Dan OMeara                                            
|Principal Executive Officer Principal Financial
Officer
ORDER OF THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL (First Chamber)

15 July 2008

Case F-28/08

**Michel Pouzol**

**v**

**Court of Auditors of the European Communities**

(Civil service – Officials – Pensions – Transfer of pension rights acquired before entry into the Communities’ service – Confirmatory decisions – Inadmissibility)

**Application:**brought under Articles 236 EC and 152 EA, in which Mr Pouzol seeks, in particular, annulment of the Court of Auditors’ decision
of 29 November 2007 rejecting his complaint against the decisions of 10 May 2007 establishing the additional years of Community
pensionable service resulting from the transfer of his pension rights acquired in France under supplementary pension schemes,
and recognition, in respect of that transfer, of 10 years, 3 months and 24 days of additional Community pensionable service.

**Held:**The action is dismissed as inadmissible. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

**Summary**

*Officials – Actions – Act adversely affecting an official – Definition – Purely confirmatory measure – Not included*

*(Staff Regulations, Arts 90(2) and 91(1))*

An action for annulment of a measure merely confirming a previous decision which was not challenged within the prescribed
period is inadmissible. A decision is a mere confirmation of an earlier decision where it contains no new factors as compared
with the earlier measure and is not preceded by any re-examination which is genuine and detailed, or based on new factors,
of the situation of the person to whom the earlier measure was addressed. The correction of a material error not affecting
the actual content of the measure does not, in itself, constitute a new decision.

(see paras 45, 47, 60)

See:

54/77 *Herpels* v *Commission* [1978] ECR 585, paras 11 to 14; 23/80 *Grasselli* v *Commission* [1980] ECR 3709, para 18; 294/84 *Adams and Others* v *Commission* [1986] ECR 977, paras 14 to 16; C-30/93 *AC‐ATEL Electronics Vertriebs* [1994] ECR I‐2305, para. 24

T‐191/96 and T‐106/97 *CAS Succhi di Frutta* v *Commission* [1999] ECR II‐3181, para. 60; T-83/99 to T-85/99 *Ripa di Meana and Others* v *Parliament* [2000] ECR II‐3493, paras 33 and 34

F-78/06 *Suhadolnik* v *Court of Justice* [2006] ECR-SC I-A-1-191 and II-A-1-795, paras 31 and 32
1 lOT 

SPRINGS 

.:J:( 

m um OF 

!3P0RWI0M 

•T OPERATIONS 

P U-- UL| 

September 14,2011 

Mr. Dennis J. Devany 

Chief, EAS & ipomestic Analysis 

US Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

400 7* St. S.W. 

C. 20590 

City of Hot Springs 

Ruth Carney, Mayor 

111 BtucridgePlace-71901 

Post Office Box 700 

Hot Springs. Arkansas 71902 

Room 6401 -

Washington, D 

RE: Docket liOT-OST-1997-2935-0188- EAS Proposals 

Dear Mr. DeV^ny: 

With regard to the recent proposals concerning the Essential Air Service for Hot Springs, Aricansas, the 

City of Hot Spijings supports Alaska Juneau Aeronautics, Inc. d/b/a SeaPort Airlines as our selection. 

Of the choices ofTta^, we believe option one (1) by SeaPort will best SCTve our community based on our 

experietices and their proven track record of providing essential air service to Hot Springs during the past 

twenty-two (22) months. In addition, continuing air service by SeaPort Airlines will allow us the 

opportunity to Continue to build the trust of the flying public for reliable air service. The Hot Springs 

Memorial Airport Committee, the Hot Springs Chamber of Commerce, the Hot Springs Advertising & 

Promotion Commission, and the City of Hot Springs all wholeheartedly support the selection of Alaska 

Juneau Aeronautics, Inc. d/b/a SeaPort Airlines as the choice for Essential Air Service at Hot Si»ings. 

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you need any additional information, please contact us. 

Sincerely, 

Rut Ruthh Camev C/ Carney 

Mayor 

cc: K. Schlemmer, DOT 

Phone: (501) 276-1038 e-mail: RulhCamevMavortgiaol.coni 
R^fO«yiTi@NNa.j!i M^i^HMMlMMH^'iMIMIMh^ 

A tHE fmm% T0 SWW^ A ttTTgR.^F syP^RT TO i m 

|V« 

air 5erylcr$ oiitioriSAveiili^liHcq 

the best «ss4}RMar?*JEs!lent)^l ^b"^Mce i 

w 

Ar]<pn;sias; 

ial^r' 

p/i^SEja:: 

ATfgST, rr^ni'iri n I..M I^ „ !• m . 

Ai^dtOlIitmii
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 449 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

AN ACT 

To require the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service 

to submit to Congress a report on the health effects 

of new psychoactive substances (including synthetic 

drugs) use. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 449 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Synthetic Drug Aware3 ness Act of 2018’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPORT ON EFFECTS ON PUBLIC HEALTH OF SYN5 THETIC DRUG USE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 3 years after the 

7 date of the enactment of this Act, the Surgeon General 

8 of the Public Health Service shall submit to Congress a 

9 report on the health effects of new psychoactive substances 

10 (including synthetic drugs) used since January 2010 by 

11 persons who are at least 12 years of age but no more than 

12 18 years of age. 

13 (b) NEW PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCE DEFINED.— 

14 For purposes of subsection (a), the term ‘‘new 

15 psychoactive substance’’ means a controlled substance 

16 analogue (as defined in section 102(32) of the Controlled 

17 Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802(32)). 

Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 18

- 00153

- CR

CASEY RAY TILLER, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 196th District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court No. 32,056

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 O R D E R The clerk’s record in this appeal was filed September 12, 2018, and the reporter’s record was filed November 2, 2018, making the appellant’s brief originally due December 3, 2018. This Court extended that briefing deadline twice, on appellant’s motions, resulting in the most recent due date of January 23, 2019. We informed counsel when we granted the last extension request

that fu rther requests for extension of time would not be granted, absent extraordinary circumstances. Nonetheless, counsel has filed a third motion seeking an additional extension of the briefing deadline.

We have reviewed the case file and appellate record, as well as counsel ’s most recent

motion to extend time , and find no extraordinary circumstances that would warrant an additional extension of the filing deadline. Consequently, counsel’s third motion to extend the time to file the appellate brief in this mat ter is denied.

W e hereby order counsel to file the appellate brief in this matter with this Court on or

before February 1 , 201 9

. This gives counsel the nine additional days she requested to complete the brief, which we are certain will be adequate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: January 29, 2019
# Patent

## Title
Final finish aftershave

## Abstract

A fragrant, topical antiseptic, astringent mixture which eliminates the bumping caused by the use of a razor and/or a depilatory is provided. The aftershave composition includes aluminum potassium sulfate dodecahydrate and an aromatic oil in a 70% by volume solution of isopropyl alcohol.

## Background
BACKGROUND
The irritation experienced by many males resulting from shaving with a razor and/or a depilatory has been well documented. There are several causes, the most outstanding being the tendency of the clipped hair to curl and grow inward beneath the skin surface. The shave surface then bumps as the combined result of shaving irritation and clipped hairs which have not grown straight through the skin.
SUMMARY
The action of an astringent solution works to eliminate and prevent shaving irritation. The addition of aluminum potassium sulfate dodecahydrate to isopropyl alcohol causes the pore size of the shave surface to be reduced and gives the topical antiseptic needed to eliminate inflammation. The reduction of pore sizes denies the clipped hair the room to curl inward, therefore causing it to grow straight through the skin surface which, essentially, prepares it for clipping again.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The following proportions of each ingredient are used to make the after shave solution:
To 95 ml. of 70% by volume isopropyl alcohol is added 5 grams aluminum potassium sulfate dodecahydrate. The mixture is allowed to sit for 2 hours. The resulting solution is then filtered to recover 0.6 grams unreacted AlK(SO4)2.12H2O.
To the resulting solution is added 5 ml. concentrated aromatic oil drop wise over a period of 30 minutes. The solution is stirred or shaken constantly during this addition.
The resulting solution is a fragrant, topical antiseptic, astringent mixture which eliminates the bumping caused by the use of a razor and/or a depilatory.

## Claims

1. An after shave composition comprising, 4.4 grams of aluminum potassium sulfate dodecahydrate and 5 ml. of an aromatic oil in 95 ml. of 70% by volume isopropyl alcohol.

2. A method of reducing shaving irritation caused by a razor or a depilatory comprising applying an aftershave composition comprising aluminum potassium sulfate dodecahydrate and an aromatic oil in a 70% by volume solution of isopropyl alcohol to the skin after shaving.
# C_2014194EN.01001901.xml

| 24.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2014 — Tisza Erőmű v Commission

(Case T-468/08) (1)

1

((State aid - Aid awarded by the Hungarian authorities to certain electricity generators - Power purchase agreements concluded between a public undertaking and certain electricity generators - Decision declaring the State aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Obligation to state reasons - Concept of State aid - Advantage - Selective nature - State resources - Imputability to the State - Effect on trade between Member States - Rights of the defence - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Misuse of powers - Article 10 of the Energy Charter Treaty))

2014/C 194/23

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tisza Erőmű kft, formerly AES-Tisza Erőmű kft (Tiszaújváros, Hungary) (represented initially by T. Ottervanger and E. Henny, lawyers, and subsequently by T. Ottervanger)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, N. Khan and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Decision 2009/609/EC of 4 June 2008 on the State aid C 41/05 awarded by Hungary through Power Purchase Agreements (OJ 2009 L 225, p. 53).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Tisza Erőmű kft to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Tisza Erőmű kft to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 10.1.2009.

1

---
# Boyd - Appalachian Regional Commission

- FIVCO Area Development District Executive Director Kelly T. Ward Email &#107;&#x65;&#x6c;l&#121;&#x40;f&#105;&#x76;c&#111;&#x2e;o&#114;&#x67;The post FIVCO Area Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Sample Renovation Recordkeeping Checklist

Name of Firm: 

Date and Location of Renovation: 

Brief Description of Renovation: 

Name of Assigned Renovator:

Name(s) of Trained Worker(s), if used: 

Name of Dust Sampling Technician, 

Inspector, or Risk Assessor, if used:

___ Copies of renovator and dust sampling technician qualifications (training certificates, certifications) on file.

___ Certified renovator provided training to workers on (check all that apply):

___ Posting warning signs ___ Setting up plastic containment barriers

___ Maintaining containment ___ Avoiding spread of dust to adjacent areas

___ Waste handling ___ Post-renovation cleaning

___Test kits used by certified renovator to determine whether lead was present on components affected 

by renovation (identify kits used and describe sampling locations and results):

___ Warning signs posted at entrance to work area.

___ Work area contained to prevent spread of dust and debris

___All objects in the work area removed or covered (interiors)

___HVAC ducts in the work area closed and covered (interiors)

___Windows in the work area closed (interiors)

___Windows in and within 20 feet of the work area closed (exteriors)

___Doors in the work area closed and sealed (interiors)

___Doors in and within 20 feet of the work area closed and sealed (exteriors)

___Doors that must be used in the work area covered to allow passage but prevent spread of dust

___Floors in the work area covered with taped-down plastic (interiors)

___Ground covered by plastic extending 10 feet from work area—plastic anchored to building and 

weighed down by heavy objects (exteriors)

___If necessary, vertical containment installed to prevent migration of dust and debris to adjacent 

property (exteriors)

___ Waste contained on-site and while being transported off-site.

___ Work site properly cleaned after renovation

___All chips and debris picked up, protective sheeting misted, folded dirty side inward, and taped 

for removal

___Work area surfaces and objects cleaned using HEPA vacuum and/or wet cloths or mops (interiors)

___ Certified renovator performed post-renovation cleaning verification (describe results, including the 

number of wet and dry cloths used):

___If dust clearance testing was performed instead, attach a copy of report

___ I certify under penalty of law that the above information is true and complete.

Name and title Date

29
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 19, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 87723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27993]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 302


Designation, Reportable Quantities, and Notification

CFR Correction

    This rule is being published by the Office of the Federal Register 
to correct an editorial or technical error that appeared in the most 
recent annual revision of the Code of Federal Regulations.

0
In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 300 to 399, 
revised as of July 1, 2023, Appendix B to Sec.  302.4 as published in 
the July 1, 2021, revision of title 40, parts 300 to 399, is 
reinstated.

[FR Doc. 2023-27993 Filed 12-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0099-10-P
UNIVERSAL EXPRESS, INC.
                                  SUBSIDIARIES




                      DOWNTOWN THEATRE TICKET AGENCY, INC.
                         INCORPORATED 5-9-58 - NEW YORK
                           D/B/A "MANHATTAN CONCIERGE"



                      SKYWORLD INTERNATIONAL COURIERS, INC.
                         INCORPORATION 10-4-88 - FLORIDA
                                 D/B/A "SKYNET"



                       "PRIVATE POSTAL NETWORK.COM, INC."
                        INCORPORATION 7-13-96 - DELAWARE



                        PACKAGING PLUS ADVERTISING, INC.
                        INCORPORATION 8-24-95 - NEW YORK
                                 D/B/A "IMAGES"



                          PACKAGING PLUS SERVICES, INC.
                  (FORMERLY CUSTOMIZED CORRUGATED CORPORATION)
                         INCORPORATED 1-26-98 - DELAWARE
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 30 September 2009 – JOOP! v OHIM (Representation of an exclamation
mark in a rectangle)**

**(Case T-191/08)**

Community trade mark – Application for registration of a figurative Community trade mark representing an exclamation mark in a rectangle – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(1)(b), (c) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b), (c) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of any distinctive character – Exception – Acquisition of distinctive character through use (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(b) and (3)) (see paras 25-30, 42-47)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 March 2008 (Case R 1822/2007-1) relating to an application for registration of a figurative sign as a Community trade mark. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | JOOP! GmbH |
| Community trade mark sought: | Figurative mark representing an exclamation mark in a rectangle, for goods in Classes 14, 18 and 25 – Application No 5332176 |
| Decision of the Examiner: | Registration refused |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders JOOP! GmbH to pay the costs. |
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4528 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4528

   To make technical amendments to certain marine fish conservation 
                   statutes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2017

   Mr. Soto introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To make technical amendments to certain marine fish conservation 
                   statutes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BILLFISH CONSERVATION ACT OF 2012.

    Section 4(c)(1) of the Billfish Conservation Act of 2012 (16 U.S.C. 
1827a(c)(1)) is amended by inserting ``and retained'' after ``landed''.

SEC. 2. SHARK CONSERVATION ACT OF 2010.

    The Act entitled ``An Act to amend the High Seas Driftnet Fishing 
Moratorium Protection Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation 
and Management Act to improve the conservation of sharks'', approved 
January 4, 2011 (Public Law 111-348; 124 Stat. 3668), is amended--
            (1) by striking section 104 and inserting the following:

``SEC. 104. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    ``Nothing in this title or the amendments made by this title shall 
be construed as affecting, altering, or diminishing in any way the 
authority of the Secretary of Commerce to establish such conservation 
and management measures as the Secretary considers necessary and 
appropriate under sections 302(a)(3) and 304(g) of the Magnuson-Stevens 
Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1852(a)(3), 
1854(g)).''; and
            (2) in section 1, by striking the item relating to section 
        104 and inserting the following:

``Sec. 104. Rule of construction.''.
                                 <all>
```
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 20 16 - 4112 Directorate ID : 2014 - SW - 043 - AD Helicopter Model: Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 33 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to exclude certain helicopters from the applicability and restrict the VNE on other helicopters to prevent failure of the horizontal stabilizer and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ Labor per Helicopter ( XX work hours X $85 for inspection) $ 48
Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $1,403 Total US Fleet Cost Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : I s the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Bob Grant
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Voyager One, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the
undersigned's knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


8/19/02                                    /s/ Gerry Martin
---------------                            -------------------------------------
Date                                       President and Chief Executive Officer

8/19/02                                    /s/ Gerry Martin
---------------                            -------------------------------------
Date                                       Principal Financial Officer