alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Delegation of Authority No. 548]

By virtue of the authority of the Secretary of State pursuant to the laws of the United States, and as delegated by Department of State Delegation of Authority No. 514, I hereby delegate to the Director of Overseas Buildings Operations, to the extent authorized by law, all functions and authorities for overseas real property management as described in the Foreign Service Buildings Act, 1926, as amended (22 U.S.C. ch. 8).

The functions delegated herein may be re-delegated, to the extent authorized by law. This delegation of authority does not revoke, supersede, or affect any other delegation of authority. Any authority covered by this delegation may also be exercised by the Secretary, the Deputy Secretary, the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources, and the Under Secretary for Management.

                    This document will be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: December 15, 2023.

John R. Bass,

Under Secretary for Management, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-28298 Filed 12-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
EXHIBIT 21


         The following are the registrant's subsidiaries, other than
subsidiaries that, if considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would
not constitute a significant subsidiary:


NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                              JURISDICTION
                                                                     OF
                                                               INCORPORATION
Chris-Craft Television, Inc.                                    Delaware
         KCOP Television, Inc.                                  California
         Oregon Television, Inc.                                Oregon
Pinelands, Inc.                                                 Delaware
United Television, Inc.                                         Delaware
         UTV of San Francisco, Inc.                             California
         UTV of San Antonio, Inc.                               Texas
         UTV of Baltimore, Inc.                                 Delaware
         UTV of Orlando, Inc.                                   Delaware
         United Television Sales, Inc.                          Delaware
# C_2010234EN.01005701.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/57

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2010 — P v Parliament

(Case F-89/08) (1)

1

(Staff case - Temporary staff - European Parliament - Dismissal - Loss of confidence)

2010/C 234/103

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: P (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr, A. Lukošiūtė and R. Ignătescu, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, application for annulment of the decision of the Parliament to dismiss the applicant with three months’ notice and, second, a claim for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application.

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009, p. 74.

1

---
14910-I3-P]

DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORT AnON .~ro OlJTl»U SYMBOL Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39

OtmNG SYMOO~ above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products liste ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). Ainvortbiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 Series Airplanes R1N 2120-AA64 PATE

# ~l-vlk'" [Docket No. FAA-2009-1223j Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-114-AD; Amendmen S\'MllOL 

## 1"'32-7 /2 -0 Ip /1//'1
- 

### i/4 39_*****; AD 2010-**-**")

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe TIN.SiSle condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: Dtrring final Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP), a small oil leak was discovered on the Spoiler Unload Valve and Rudder Shutoff Valve bodies. Investigation revealed that a number of valves were manufactured with an incorrect wall thickness. This thin wall condition caused cracking, subsequent external weeping and pressure loss from the subject valves. rNlTIAUiSle
A'[E

ourlNe SYMOOl This condition, ifnot corrected, will cause a loss of hydraulic fluid and subsequent loss of spoiler and/or rudder control. 'ITIALS1Sle


# • • 

# • • • • • lITlNC SYMBOL We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.(4910-I3-P] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 (Docket No. FAA·2009-1223; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-114~AD; Amendment 39-*****; AD 2010-**-**] RlN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 Series Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransporlation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: Weareadopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products liste above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority ofanother country to identify and correct anunsafe condition onanaviation product. The MeAldescribes theunsafe condition as; During final Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP), asmall oil leakwas discovered onthe Spoiler Unload Valve and Rudder ShutoffValve bodies. Investigation revealed thatanumber ofvalves were manufactured with an incorrect wall thickness. This thinwall condition caused cracking, subsequent external weeping andpressure Jossfrom the subject valves. This condition, ifnot corrected, willcause aloss ofhydraulic fluid and subsequent loss ofspoiler and/or rudder control. 'Q"'CLJ I< '"eS OUT,NGSYM"QL ANE-171

MrlAL.5IS'G C. orne:.

XlUT'NG Sf UO,. LGB/AEG



# , , , , , , , UTtN(; SY'"'''OL Weare issuing this AD torequire actions tocorrect theunsafe condition onthese products.
#### Noble BROWN, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant In Error.

No. A-13109.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

March 14, 1962.

*42Thomas Hanlon, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

•BUSSEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence based on a plea of. guilty to an. information filed in the District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, on March 3, 1961, charging Noble Brown with the offense of Grand Larceny committed on February 3, •1961. At his trial on May 25, 1961, plaintiff in error, present and with his attorney, entered a plea of guilty, whereupon the District Court of Tulsa County sentenced him to serve a term of one year in the State Penitentiary. From.this judgment and sentence this appeal has been perfected.

Oral argument was set for February 7, 1962, at which time neither the Defendant nor counsel appeared, and no brief was filed. Under these conditions, this court has repeatedly held that we can search the record only for fundamental error and none being found the judgment and sentence will be affirmed. Hulsey v. State, 82 Okl.Cr. 332, 169 P.2d 771; Epps v. State, 69 Okl.Cr. 460, 104 P.2d 262; Riner v. State, 82 Okl.Cr. 442, 172 P.2d 345.

We have carefully examined the record and find that it supports the judgment and sentence entered in this cause and is free from fundamental error. The same is therefore affirmed.

NIX, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
# Garrett - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Western Maryland: Elevating the Outdoors Two Appalachian Maryland counties used BIL funds to expand outdoor recreation by attracting new businesses and more visitors.  The post Western Maryland: Elevating the Outdoors appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Garrett County, Maryland: Connecting the Unconnected High-speed broadband will be expanded to 300 unserved households. The post Garrett County, Maryland: Connecting the Unconnected appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Tri-County Council for Western Maryland, Inc. Executive Director Leanne Mazer Email &#108;e&#97;n&#110;e&#x40;t&#x63;c&#x77;m&#x64;&#46;&#x6f;r&#x67;The post Tri-County Council for Western Maryland, Inc. appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                                      9,342,727
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 225,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    0
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             22,727,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               0
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 19,797,739
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               22,727,752
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           10,433,457
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            5,675,068
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              104,335
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            319,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             4,334,639
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         4,334,639
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                4,334,639
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0



</TABLE>
Navigate to Homepage
Search
Main navigation
  

        
              Explore the Capitol Campus
                          Art
                            Buildings & Grounds
                            Capitol Hill Facts
                            Visitor Resources
                            Our Blog
                            What We Do
                          Areas of Expertise
                            Programs & Ceremonies
                            Projects
                            Publications
                            Strategic Objectives
                            About Us
                          Who We Are
                            History of the AOC
                            News & Notices
                            Organizational Structure
                            Partnerships & Recognition
                            Work With UsSearch Breadcrumb
    HomeWhat We DoMajor Projects
Hart Building Roof and Skylight Replacement
        
                  The Basics
      
Location
    Hart Senate Office Building

Status
    Completed
End Date
    2015As part of this project, completed in 2015, the AOC also installed a 148 kW photovoltaic system on the Hart Senate Office Building roof. The solar panels will decrease utility use, increase sustainability and make the building eligible for an energy credit program which will further reduce electrical costs.

In December 2014, the Architect of the Capitol (AOC) began replacing the roof and 180 skylights and upgrading the fall protection system on the Hart Senate Office Building. The roof and skylights, which were installed in 1982, had reached the end of their useful life and, over time, had allowed water infiltration which caused building damage.

Image
    Solar panels.As part of the project, the AOC also installed a 148 kW photovoltaic system on the Hart roof. The solar panels will decrease utility use, increase sustainability and make the Senate Office Buildings eligible for an energy credit program which will further reduce electrical costs.

The Architect of the Capitol was also able to take advantage of the suspended work platform constructed for the project to perform a structural safety analysis of the cloud components of Alexander Calder’s *Mountains and Clouds* sculpture in the Hart Atrium.

**This roof and skylight replacement was completed in summer 2015.**
          
    
      

      We love our jobs. Do you? Come work with us.
        View Job Listings Serve. Preserve. Inspire.

              Contact Us
                            Accountability
                            Hill Staff Resources
                            AOC Staff Resources
Utility
  

        
              Privacy Policy
                            Image Terms of Use
                            Inspector General
                            U.S. Botanic Garden
                            U.S. Capitol Visitor CenterFacebook
	Twitter
	Flickr
	YouTube
	Instagram
	Subscribe
IB 

Union Calendar No. 409 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4263 

[Report No. 115–544] 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to small company capital 

formation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 7, 2017 

Mr. MACARTHUR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

FEBRUARY 2, 2018 

Additional sponsors: Ms. SINEMA, Mr. HOLLINGSWORTH, Mr. STIVERS, and 

Mr. GOTTHEIMER

FEBRUARY 2, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4263 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to small 

company capital formation, and for other purposes. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4263 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Regulation At Im5 provement Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. JOBS ACT-RELATED EXEMPTION. 

7 Section 3(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 

8 77c(b)) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking 

10 ‘‘$50,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$75,000,000, ad11 justed for inflation by the Commission every 2 years 

12 to the nearest $10,000 to reflect the change in the 

13 Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers 

14 published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics’’; and 

15 (2) in paragraph (5)— 

16 (A) by striking ‘‘such amount as’’ and in17 serting: ‘‘such amount, in addition to the ad18 justment for inflation provided for under such 

19 paragraph (2)(A), as’’; and 

20 (B) by striking ‘‘such amount, it’’ and in21 serting ‘‘such amount, in addition to the adjust22 ment for inflation provided for under such 

23 paragraph (2)(A), it’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 409 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4263 

[Report No. 115–544] 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 with respect 

other purposes. to small company capital formation, and for 

FEBRUARY 2, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Spirit,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  August 12, 2005

                                        /s/ Peter Sotola
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Peter Sotola
                                        Secretary, Treasurer & C.F.O.
                                        (Principal Financial Officer and
                                         Principal Accounting Officer)
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 20

- 00222

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 362nd District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19

- 6118

- 362

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womac k , JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### E X PARTE 

### D.R.2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

The parties, through their attorneys, have signed and filed a “Settlement

Agreement” under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2)(B)

, and they have

asked this court to vacate the t rial court’s judgment and remand this cause for entry of

an agreed order of expunction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). In accordance with

the parties’ agreement, we set asid e the trial court’s judgment without regard to the

merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance

with the agreement. See id

.

Per Curiam

Delivered : January 7, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,001,254
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,826,208
<ALLOWANCES>                                       200,000
<INVENTORY>                                      1,182,517
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,274,493
<PP&E>                                           6,481,460
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,708,810
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,202,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,543,450
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             9,603
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,451,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,202,627
<SALES>                                         21,641,846
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,641,846
<CGS>                                           22,434,570
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,070,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (30,542)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,997,844)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,850,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9,147,844)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.13)
        


</TABLE>
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 17 December 2008 – Commission v Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Regional**

**(Case T-174/08)**

Arbitration clause – Contract for financial assistance concluded under a specific programme in the field of telematic applications of common interest
– Encata Project – Reimbursement of sums advanced – Late‐payment interest – Default procedure

Procedure – Referral to the Court of First Instance under an arbitration clause – Contract granting Community financial assistance for carrying out a project in the area of research, technological development
and demonstration – Overall financial contribution to the project less than the amount of the sum advanced by the Commission – Right to partial repayment of the advance, plus late-payment interest – Interest rate for delay claimed by the Commission lower than that calculated under the rules of the applicable national law
(Art. 238 EC) (see paras 51-59)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION under Article 238 EC seeking an order that the defendant reimburse part of the amount advanced by the European Community, together with late-payment interest, under contract SU 1001 (SU) Encata. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Orders Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Regional, SA to reimburse to the Commission of the European Communities the sum of EUR 63 349.27, together with late-payment interest: |

–        at the rate of 6.29% per annum from 31 January 2001 to the date of the present judgment;

–        at the annual rate applied under Irish law, that is to say, currently Article 26 of the Debtors (Ireland) Act 1840, as amended,
up to the rate of 6.29% per annum from the date of the present judgment to full clearance of the debt.

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Regional to pay the costs. |