In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-08-00131-CR

______________________________

MICHAEL CHARLES FULLER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 6th Judicial District Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18771

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Michael Charles Fuller appeals from his convictions by a jury of indecency with a child by

contact (count one), indecency with a child by exposure (count two), and sexual assault of a child

(count three). See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 21.11 (Vernon 2003), § 22.011 (Vernon Supp. 2008).

The jury assessed his punishment at fifteen years' imprisonment on count one, five years'

imprisonment on count two (to run consecutive to the sentence in count one), and fifteen years'

imprisonment on count three (to run concurrently with the sentences in counts one and two). Fuller

was represented by appointed counsel at trial and on appeal. Fuller's attorney has filed a brief in

which he concludes that the appeal is frivolous and without merit, after a review of the record and

the related law.

Counsel states that he has studied the record and finds no error preserved for appeal that

could be successfully argued. The brief contains a professional evaluation of the record and

advances nine arguable grounds for review. This meets the requirements of Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); and High v. State,

573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978).

Counsel mailed a copy of the brief to Fuller on January 15, 2009, informing Fuller of his right

to examine the entire appellate record and to file a pro se response. Counsel simultaneously filed

a motion with this Court seeking to withdraw as counsel in this appeal. Fuller filed his response on

May 13, 2009.
Since we agree this case presents no reversible error, we also, in accordance with Anders,

1

grant counsel's request to withdraw from further representation of Fuller in this case. No substitute

counsel will be appointed. Should Fuller wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court

of Criminal Appeals, Fuller must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review

or Fuller must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review

must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last timely motion for

rehearing that was overruled by this Court. See TEX.R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary

review must be filed with this Court, after which it will be forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal

Appeals along with the rest of the filings in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for

discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4.

3

We have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous. We have independently reviewed

the clerk's record and the reporter's record, and we agree that no arguable issues support an appeal.

See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

1

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: June 3, 2009

Date Decided: June 4, 2009

Do Not Publish