alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 443 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability 

and feasibility of designating the James K. Polk Home 

in Columbia, Tennessee, as a unit of the National Park 

System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 443 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘James K. Polk Presi3 dential Home Study Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 Congress finds that— 

6 (1) in 1961, the James K. Polk Home was des7 ignated as a National Historic Landmark; and 

8 (2) in April 2015, the National Park Service 

9 completed a reconnaissance survey of the James K. 

10 Polk Home, in which the National Park Service— 

11 (A) determined that— 

12 (i) the James K. Polk Home is con13 clusively nationally significant; and 

14 (ii) a special resource study is needed 

15 to fully analyze the suitability, feasibility, 

16 and need for management of the James K. 

17 Polk Home by the National Park Service; 

18 and 

19 (B) recommended that Congress consider 

20 authorizing a special resource study for the 

21 James K. Polk Home and associated properties. 

22 SEC. 3. STUDY. 

23 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior (re24 ferred to in this Act as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall conduct a 

25 special resource study of the site of the James K. Polk 
3 

•HR 443 EH

1 Home in Columbia, Tennessee, and adjacent property (re2 ferred to in this Act as the ‘‘site’’). 

3 (b) CRITERIA.—The Secretary shall conduct the 

4 study under subsection (a) in accordance with section 

5 100507 of title 54, United States Code. 

6 (c) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under sub7 section (a), the Secretary shall— 

8 (1) evaluate the national significance of the 

9 site; 

10 (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 

11 designating the site as a unit of the National Park 

12 System; 

13 (3) include cost estimates for any necessary ac14 quisition, development, operation, and maintenance 

15 of the site; 

16 (4) consult with interested Federal, State, or 

17 local governmental entities, private and nonprofit or18 ganizations, or other interested individuals; and 

19 (5) identify alternatives for the management, 

20 administration, and protection of the site. 

21 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

22 on which funds are made available to carry out the study 

23 under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the 

24 Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Rep-
4 

•HR 443 EH

1 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

2 Resources of the Senate a report that describes— 

3 (1) the findings and conclusions of the study; 

4 and 

5 (2) any recommendations of the Secretary. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 16, 2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 443 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the 

other purposes. a unit of the National Park System, and for James K. Polk Home in Columbia, Tennessee, as suitability and feasibility of designating the
**Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 March 2009 – Efkon v Parliament and Council**

**(Case C‐146/08 P)**

Appeals – Directive 2004/52/EC – Interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community – Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded

Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Directive on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community – Action brought by a supplier of those systems (Art. 230, fourth para., EC; European Parliament and Council Directive 2004/52)
(see paras 36-42)

**Re:**

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 22 January 2008 in Case T-298/04 | Efkon | v | Parliament and Council | , by which that Court dismissed as inadmissible the action for annulment of Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 124) – Requirement that the contested measure should be of individual concern – Right to a fair hearing – Duration of the proceedings before the Court of First Instance. |

**Operative part:**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The appeal is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Efkon AG is ordered to pay the costs. |
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ LEE E. BECKELMANName:
    
    Lee E. BeckelmanTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 117 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5709]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mrs. BLACK:
       H.R. 6299.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Bankruptcy Regulation
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 4
       The Congress shall have Power *** To establish an uniform 
     Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of 
     Bankruptcies throughout the United States.
       Business Regulation
       Article I, Section 8, Clause 3
       The Congress shall have Power *** To regulate Commerce with 
     foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the 
     Indian Tribes.
```
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 4.3

                           SHORT TERM PROMISSORY NOTE

US$18,000.00                                                      April 14, 2006

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Voyager One, Inc. promises to pay to the order of Castle
Hill Advisory Group at such place as the holder of this Note may from time to
time designate, the principal sum of Eighteen Thousand and 00/100 (US$18,000.00)
together with simple interest at the prime rate as published in the Wall Street
Journal on the first business day of each month on the outstanding principal
balance for each respective month until maturity.

The note matures and becomes due anytime on demand. The amount of the payment
shall be an amount equal to the outstanding principal and unpaid interest.
Interest shall be payable monthly on the last calendar day of each month.

All payments on account of the indebtedness evidenced by this note shall be
first applied to interest on the unpaid principal balance and the remainder to
principal.

All parties to this note severally waive presentment for payment, notice of
dishonor, protest and notice of protest.

This note shall be effective April 14, 2006 regardless of when it is signed.

                        "Payor"                               "Payee"

Name:            Voyager One. Inc.                   Castle Hill Advisory Group
Address:         16 East Hinsdale Avenue             433 S. Washington St.
                 Hinsdale, IL   60521                Hinsdale, IL   60521
Phone:           630-325-7130                        Phone:   630-546-6672
Fax:             630-325-7140


             By: /s/ John A. Lichter             By: /s/ Sebastien C. DuFort
                 ------------------------            --------------------------
                 Signature & Date                    Signature & Date
                 John A. Lichter                     Sebastien C. DuFort
                 CEO                                 Managing Director
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Polar Molecular Holding Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Brian P. Alleman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Brian P. AllemanBrian P. AllemanChief Financial OfficerApril 12, 2004




This Certification is made
solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This written statement shall not be deemed to be filed as part of the annual report on Form 10-K that it accompanies.
Exhibit 31.1



Certifications for Form 10-QSB



I, Curtis S. Reis, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Alliance Bancshares California;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors:



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |  |  |       |  |                    |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----- |  | ------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 16, 2005 |  |  |  | Name: |  | /s/ Curtis S. Reis
|                   |  |  |  |       |  | Title:             |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<LEGEND> THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CORPORATIONS FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2000, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

      <MULTIPLIER> 1

      <S>                           <C>
      <PERIOD-TYPE>                      QUARTER
      <FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JAN 31-2000
      <PERIOD-END>                  OCT 31-2000
      <CASH>                            (31,657)
      <SECURITIES>                            0
      <RECEIVABLES>                           0
      <ALLOWANCES>                            0
      <INVENTORY>                             0
      <CURRENT ASSETS>                  (31,657)
      <PP&E>                             34,960
      <DEPRECIATION>                    (10,912)
      <TOTAL ASSETS>                    147,734
      <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             700,067
      <BONDS>                                 0
      <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
      <PREFERRED>                             0
      <COMMON>                       12,458,557
      <OTHER-SE>                              0
      <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      147,734
      <SALES>                                 0
      <TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0
      <CGS>                                   0
      <TOTAL COSTS>                     663,828
      <OTHER EXPENSES>                        0
      <LOSS PROVISION>                        0
      <INTEREST EXPENSE>                (11,250)
      <INCOME PRETAX>                  (694,981)
      <INCOME-TAX>                            0
      <INCOME CONTINUING>              (694,981)
      <DISCONTINUED>                          0
      <EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
      <CHANGES>                               0
      <NET-INCOME>                     (694,981)
      <EPS-BASIC>                        (.04)
      <EPS-DILUTED>                        (.04)
# C_2008209EN.01003101.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/31

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Campania (Italy) lodged on 16 June 2008 — Futura Immobiliare Srl Hotel Futura and Others v Comune di Casoria

(Case C-254/08)

(2008/C 209/46)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Campania

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Futura Immobiliare Srl Hotel Futura and Others

Applicant:

Defendant: Comune di Casoria

Defendant:

Question referred

The question arising is whether the national provisions contained in Article 58 et seq of Legislative Decree No 507 of 1993 and the transitional provisions maintaining them in force, by virtue of Article 11 of Presidential Decree No 158 of 1999, as subsequently amended, and Article 1(184) of Law No 296 of 2006, so ensuring the continuation of a system, fiscal in nature, designed to cover the costs of the waste disposal service and postponing the introduction of a tariff regime in which the cost of the service is borne by the persons producing and delivering the waste, are compatible with the abovementioned Article 15 of the Community Directive 75/442/EEC (1) which replaces Directive 91/156/EEC (2) and the principle of ‘the polluter pays’ referred to.

1

2

---

(1)  OJ L 194, p. 39.

1

(2)  OJ L 78, p. 32.

2

---
# C_2008327EN.01002802.xml

| 20.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 15 October 2008 — Bank Melli Iran v Council

(Case T-390/08 R)

(Applications for interim measures - Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 - Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran - Council decision - Measure to freeze funds and economic resources - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency - Absence of serious and irreparable damage)

(2008/C 327/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bank Melli Iran (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: L. Defalque, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop, E. Finnegan and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for suspension of the application of paragraph 4, section B, of the Annex to Council Decision 2008/475/EC of 23 June 2008 implementing Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2008 L 163, p. 29), in so far as Bank Melli Iran is included in the list of legal persons, entities and bodies whose funds and economic resources are frozen.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
# C_2011340EN.01001601.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Galileo International Technology v OHIM — Galileo Sistemas y Servicios (GSS GALILEO SISTEMAS Y SERVICIOS)

(Case T-488/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark ‘GSS GALILEO SISTEMAS Y SERVICIOS’ - Earlier Community word marks ‘GALILEO’ - Earlier Community figurative mark ‘powered by Galileo’ - Earlier Community figurative marks ‘GALILEO INTERNATIONAL’ - Relative ground for refusal - Lack of likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2011/C 340/30

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Galileo International Technology LLC (Bridgetown, Barbados) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, M. Blair and K. Gilbert, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: Ó. Mondéjar Ortuño and P. Bullock, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Galileo Sistemas y Servicios, SL (Madrid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 August 2008 (Case R 403/2006-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Galileo International Technology, LLC and Galileo Sistemas y Servicios, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Galileo International Technology, LLC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Galileo International Technology, LLC to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 24.1.2009.

1

---
EXHIBIT 10.6


 


AMENDMENT NO.
6


TO


1999 OMNIBUS STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This Amendment No. 6 to the 1999 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (this “Amendment”)
is executed by the undersigned, by and on behalf of Caldera International,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).


 


Background


 


The Company is the successor in interest and has adopted the Caldera
Systems, Inc. 1999 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the “1999 Plan”).  The Company desires to amend the 1999 Plan to
increase the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the
1999 Plan.  Capitalized terms used in
this Amendment but not defined herein have the meaning set forth in the 1999
Plan.


 


Amendment


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the 1999 Plan is hereby amended as follows:


 


1.               Increase is Number of Shares Subject
to the 1999 Plan and Individual Limitation. 
The first sentence of Section 3(a) of the 1999 Plan is hereby deleted in
its entirety and the following is inserted in its stead:


 


“Subject to adjustment under Section 3(c) below, as of November 2, 2001,
the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan
shall be 15,300,423 shares, increased as of November 1 each year (the November
1, 2001 increase having been included in the 15,300,423), beginning November 1,
2000, by three percent (3%) of the total number of shares of Common Stock that
are issued and outstanding on the immediately preceding October 31st.


 


2.               Ratification.  Except as specifically modified hereby, the
1999 Plan is hereby ratified and affirmed by the Company.


 


3.               Effectiveness.  No shares of Common Stock shall be issued or
other Incentive Awards shall be permitted to be exercised in reliance upon this
Amendment unless and until the stockholders have approved this Amendment and
any waiting periods required by governing laws or regulations have passed.


 


The undersigned, who is the duly elected Secretary of the Board of
Directors of the Company, hereby certifies that the Board of Directors of the
Company approved this Amendment on October 3, 2001.


 


	
   

  	
  Caldera International, Inc., a Delaware corporation

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ J. HARRISON COLTER

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  J. Harrison Colter

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Secretary to the Board of Directors