alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                DISABILITY REINSURANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.



                                                              March 23, 2001

Lisa O. Hansen
429 Old Ocean House Road
Cape Elizabeth, ME 04107


         Re:      Extension of Mutually-Agreed Severance Date

Dear Lisa:

         This is to confirm our agreement that we have mutually-agreed that the
"Severance Date" (as defined in the January 18, 2001 letter agreement between
you and DRMS) will be changed from April 1, 2001 to May 1, 2001.

         Please sign this letter agreement in the space provided below to
evidence your acceptance and agreement with the foregoing.

                                    Sincerely,

                                    CORE, INC.


                                    By: /s/ George C. Carpenter IV
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        George C. Carpenter IV
                                        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

                                    DISABILTY RESINSURANCE MANAGEMENT
                                    SERVICES, INC.


                                    By: /s/ Michael D. Lachance
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Michael D. Lachance
                                        President
Accepted and agreed to.


/s/ Lisa O. Hansen
--------------------------------------
Lisa O. Hansen
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November 19, 2009                                       |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                |   |   |   |
| /s/ G. Richard Smith                                                |   |   |   |
|                                                                     |   |   |   |
| G. Richard SmithChief Executive OfficerSunRidge International, Inc. |   |   |   |
|                                                                |   |   |   |

----
EXHIBIT
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of  FORESIGHT SPECIALISTS, INC.,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Kevin Ericksteen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      September 18, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Kevin EricksteenName:
      Kevin EricksteenTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

EDWARD WALLS, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 548 WAL 2014 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Unpublished Memorandum and 

Order of the Superior Court at No. 2001 

WDA 2013 exited November 10, 2014, 

affirming the Order of the Allegheny 

County Court of Common Pleas at No. 

CP-02-CR-0008331-1996 exited 

December 11, 2013 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is GRANTED on the issue of whether Petitioner’s sentence violates the prohibition 

against mandatory life sentences for juvenile offenders announced by the Supreme 

Court of the United States in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012). 

As a result of the recent holding by that Court that Miller must be applied retroactively 

by the States, see Montgomery v. Louisiana, 2016 WL 280758 (U.S. Jan. 25, 2016), the 

Superior Court’s order is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further 

proceedings consistent with Montgomery. 

To the extent necessary, leave is to be granted to amend the post-conviction 

petition to assert the jurisdictional provision of the Post Conviction Relief Act extending 

to the recognition of constitutional rights by the Supreme Court of the United States 

which it deems to be retroactive. See 42 Pa.C.S. §9545(b)(1)(iii). 

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this 

matter.
Seventh
                                 Amendment 
                                  of the
                              Restated 2/22/91
                                 By-Laws
                                    of
                                GEHL COMPANY
                          (A Wisconsin Corporation)

Effective immediately, Section 3.01 shall be revised to read as follows:

     "3.01 General Powers and Number.  All corporate powers shall be
exercised by or under the authority of, and the business and affairs of the
corporation shall be managed under the direction of its Board of Directors.
The number of directors of the corporation shall be nine (9) divided into
three (3) classes:  Class I - three (3) directors; Class II - three (3) 
directors; Class III - three (3) directors."

Approved at February 26, 1999, Board Meeting
(August 21, 1991)

#### In the Matter of Glenn D. Bell, Appellant, v Agnes Butterstein et al., Respondents, and Vincent J. Cuttita et al., Respondents.

— In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating the respondents-respondents as candidates in the Republican Party primary election to be held on September 12, 1991, for the party position of Member of the Republican Party County Committee of Kings County in the 54th Assembly District, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated August 6, 1991, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner has failed to demonstrate that he is an enrolled voter in the 54th Assembly District or that he is an "aggrieved candidate” within the meaning of the Election Law *(see,*Election Law § 6-154 [2]; § 16-102 [1]; *Lucariello v Niebel,*72 NY2d 927). Thus, the proceeding was properly dismissed for lack of standing. We have examined the petitioner’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Kunzeman, J. P., Eiber, Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
p.1 

OAR Box 1147 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

217) IV-E-91 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:58 PM Sheet 217 of 242 
•**""* r

i UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGA N 48105 

P.2 

4-S.7-'/ 

•&-*-<?! 

JUN 2 0 1989 

OFFICE OF 

AIR ANO RADIATION 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Report on Meeting With General Motors to Discuss 

Evaportative Emissions 

FROM: David B. Bartus, Chemical Engineer wO** 

Standards Development and Support Branch 

TO: 

THRU: 

Dockets A-85-21 and A-87-11 

Richard Rykowski, Senior Project Manager 

Standards Development and Support Branch 

A meeting was held on May 24, 1989 with representatives of 

General Motors to discuss their current evaporative emissions 

test program and results that have been obtained front it. 

Material presented by GM focused on the contents of draft SAE 

paper 891121, 'Evaporative Emissions . under Real Time 

Conditions." Following this presentation, EPA discussed recent 

development work being carried out on the PT evaporative 

emissions model that relates to GM test results and comments 

made about the model in the SAE paper. A list of attendees is 

attached. 

Attachment 
P.3 

Meeting with General Motors 

May 24, 1989 

Attendance List 

Tom Liberty GM 

Dave Bartus EPA, SDSB 

Jim Gumbleton GM 

Lois Platte EPA, TEB 

Terry Newell EPA, TEB 

Paul Laing EPA, SDSB 

Celia Shih EPA, TEB 

Jim Pasek GM 

John Anderson EPA, SDSB 

Lisa Fior GM 

Bill Cadman GM
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1450]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  TRIBUTE TO CAPTAIN JOHN ALTEE BARGER

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. SCOTT R. TIPTON

                              of colorado

                    in the house of representatives

                       Monday, September 10, 2012

  Mr. TIPTON. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize Captain John Altee 
Barger of Pueblo, Colorado. Capt. Barger was a thirty-two year veteran 
of the Pueblo Police Department and an avid pilot. Capt. Barger was 
tragically killed in the line of duty, while conducting a narcotics 
investigation over the San Isabel Forest.
  Born in Goodland, Kansas on April 17, 1948, Captain Barger served as 
a Patrol Officer in the Pueblo Police Department, and achieved much 
success there as a Commander in the SWAT team. A detective at heart, 
Capt. Barger also served in the Investigations Division for eleven 
years, where his instincts for solving crimes were put to great use.
  Additionally, Captain Barger, with the help of his fellow SWAT 
officers, won the Soldier of Fortune shooting competition in Nevada--an 
award he cherished. Capt. Barger leaves behind a son and numerous other 
family and friends, including the officers with whom he served.
  Mr. Speaker, it is an honor to recognize Capt. John Altee Barger. I 
rise today on behalf of the citizens of Colorado's 3rd Congressional 
District, who are proud to call such a courageous man one of their own.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6023]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The majority leader is recognized.

                          ____________________
```
Summary of Executive Salary and Bonus Arrangements




 EXHIBIT 10.66 
  
 Summary of Executive Salary and Bonus Arrangements 
  
 The table below summarizes the current annual salary and bonus arrangements we have with each of our
executive officers, and provides information regarding salary and bonus amounts earned by each of our executive officers in 2004. All of the compensation arrangements we have with our executive officers, including with respect to annual salaries and
bonuses, are reviewed and may be modified from time to time by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee approved the annual salary and bonus arrangements noted in the table below. 
  
 We generally pay bonuses, if any, to our executive officers
on a quarterly basis. On February 9, 2005, the Compensation Committee adopted an executive bonus plan effective beginning January 1, 2005, a description of which is filed as Exhibit 10.68 to the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition
to the bonus arrangements noted in the table below, all of our executive officers are eligible for discretionary bonuses as determined from time to time by the Compensation Committee. 
  
 We have written or oral employment arrangements with each of our executive officers, and a copy of each such
employment arrangement is filed as an exhibit to the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K. The non-salary and bonus components of our compensation arrangements with our executive officers, including with respect to severance, option grants and
other benefits, are described in those respective agreements. 
  

					
	 Executive Officer

	  	 Salary

	    	 Bonus


	 Frank F. Khulusi
 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	 2005: $800,000
 2004: $645,384(2)
	    	 2005: (1)
 2004: $136,907

	 Theodore R. Sanders
 Chief Financial Officer
	  	 2005: $300,000
 2004: $250,349(3)
	    	 2005: (1)
 2004: $43,234

	 Daniel J. DeVries
 Executive Vice President—Marketing
	  	 2005: $257,500
 2004: $257,500
	    	 2005: (1)
 2004: $16,525

	 Kristin M. Rogers
 Executive Vice President—Enterprise Sales
	  	 2005: $257,500
 2004: $257,500
	    	 2005: (1)
 2004: $50,884

	 Robert I. Newton
 General Counsel
	  	 2005: $250,000
 2004: $143,269(5)
	    	 2005: (4)
 2004: $35,134


  

	 (1)
	 Messrs. Khulusi, Sanders and DeVries and Ms. Rogers are eligible to participate in our executive bonus plan, pursuant to which a bonus pool is determined based
upon the achievement of specified quantitative criteria and allocated in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. 



	 (2)
	 Mr. Khulusi’s annual base salary was changed, effective October 28, 2004, from $600,000 to $800,000. 



	 (3)
	 Mr. Sanders’ annual base salary was changed, effective August 2, 2004, from $242,050 to $257,500, and is presently $300,000. 



	 (4)
	 Mr. Newton is eligible for an annual bonus of up to $50,000, as well as for discretionary bonuses as determined from time to time by the Compensation Committee.




	 (5)
	 Mr. Newton commenced employment with us on June 8, 2004.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-12-0242 SAT Date: 3/30/2012 Print Date: 8/2/2013
Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:
Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 1 Health: PMN ; Eco: intact material 2 3 Health: Eco: high concern for toxicity of incomplete incinera t p roducts to terrestrial organisms Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 3 1 1 PMN 3 2 2 Incin Pdt

Exposure Based Review : Health: Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Inhalation Drinking water and inhalaiton for
Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; PMN negl; Incin Pdt rapid Keywords : Keywords: PMN: LUNG OVERLOAD LIVER; BLOOD; MALE REPRO; IMMUNOTOX; ONCO; AQUATOX Summary of Assessment : Fate : Fate Summary: P-12-0241-42 FATE:
S = N egl. VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E)POTW removal (%) = PMN 90 via sorption; Incin Pdt 0 Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = PMN >mo; Incin Pdt >mo Sorption to soils/sediments = PMN v.strong; Incin Pdt low PBT Potential: PMN P3B1; Incin Pdt P3B2 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = PMN negl; Incin Pdt rapid
Health : Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes ( p che m ). Concern for lung toxicity if inhaled based on lung overload for high molecular weight polymers. For the potential incomplete incineration product, based on test data for the analogue concerns are liver toxicity, blood toxicity, and male reproductive toxicity [rat 28-day oral N OAEL = 50 mg/kg, LOAEL = 150 mg/kg with liver toxicity; rat 90-day oral LOAEL = 10 mg/kg based on decreased body weight in males at all doses and liver toxicity and anemia at 200 mg/kg; there were toxic effects on the testes in 2 males in the 90-day oral study that were judged by the reviewer to be indicative of the potential for male reproductive toxicity. There is also concern for immunosuppression and oncogenicity based on data for

. Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments
fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value * daphnid

_ chronic value * algal

_ chronic value * Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _
Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SAR chemical class = p olyme r
- S < 0.001 mg/L at 20 C(P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) *
SARs nonionic polymers SAR Class p olyme r -nonionic-Ecotox Category N onionic Polymers Ecotox Factors Comments: SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
Animal and Plant

Health Inspection

Service

Veterinary Services

Strategy and Policy

Live Animal Imports

4700 River Road

Unit 39

Riverdale, MD 20737

(301) 851-3000

 November 22, 2019

Notice Regarding Permanent Privately Owned Equine Quarantine Facilities

USDA would like to remind quarantine operators of permitted activities when 

operating USDA approved permanent privately owned equine quarantine facilities and 

clarify APHIS oversight. APHIS Veterinary Services is committed to customer service 

and delivering our programs efficiently, effectively, and with integrity.

Per Code of Federal Regulations (CFR 93.308 (c)(1)(iv) approved permanent privately 

owned equine quarantine facilities must not be operated by a person responsibly 

connected with the business of the quarantine facility and acts as a paid agent (broker) 

for the importation or subsequent sale of horses. 

A person responsibly connected with the business of the quarantine facility only 

defined as a person who has ownership, mortgage or lease interest in the facility’s 

physical plant. This also may include being a partner, officer, director, holder, owner 

of 10 percent or more of its voting stock, or an employee in a managerial or executive 

capacity. 

USDA may deny or withdraw approval of a permanent privately owned equine 

quarantine facility that is not in compliance with the current regulations. Quarantine 

requirements for APHIS approval are located at 9 CFR 93.308.

APHIS does work with each entity who submits a request for approval, and sets no 

limit on the number of quarantines facilities per approved port of entry. If the facility 

meets approval, APHIS representatives will be present at all import quarantine 

operations in order to monitor and to provide other technical services to ensure the 

biological security of the facility. Import quarantine operations at a permanent and 

temporary privately owned quarantine facility are conducted only with the physical 

presence of and monitoring by APHIS representatives. APHIS has sole discretion on 

the number of APHIS personnel assigned to the facility. 

This document will be available on our website: USDA APHIS VS Equine Import and 

Export Guidelines. For questions or concerns, please contact the Live Animal Import 

Director, Dr. Rachel Cezar-Martinez at Rachel.Cezar-Martinez@usda.gov or at the 

following phone number: (301) 851-3300.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Harry P. Beugelink, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of MASTER  DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEMS, INC.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)  presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 18, 2005

/s/ Harry P. Beugelink
------------------------
By: Harry P. Beugelink
Principal Executive Officer
NO. 12-19-00092-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:

BARBARA MOTT BORDELON, 

RELATOR

§

§

§

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Barbara Mott Bordelon filed an original proceeding in which she challenged the denial of 

her motion to dismiss for want of prosecution.1 On April 30, 2019, this Court conditionally granted 

Bordelon’s petition and directed Respondent to vacate his February 9, 2019, order denying 

Bordelon’s motion to dismiss, and in its stead, to issue an order granting Bordelon’s motion and 

dismissing Lois Hale’s lawsuit against Bordelon, without prejudice. By an order signed on May 

1, Respondent complied with this Court’s opinion and order, rendering this proceeding moot.

Accordingly, we dismiss Bordelon’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot. 

Opinion delivered May 8, 2019.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)

 1 Respondent is the Honorable Paul E. White, Judge of the 159th District Court in Angelina County, Texas.

Lois Hale is the Real Party in Interest.
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MAY 8, 2019

NO. 12-19-00092-CV

BARBARA MOTT BORDELON,

Relator

V.

HON. PAUL E. WHITE,

Respondent

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by 

Barbara Mott Bordelon; who is the relator in appellate cause number 12-19-00092-CV and the 

defendant in trial court cause number CV-02421-13-06, pending on the docket of the 159th Judicial 

District Court of Angelina County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed 

herein on March 12, 2019, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of 

this Court that the writ should not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and 

ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed as 

moot.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.