alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 543 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4609 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 17, 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

JULY 30, 2018 

Reported by Ms. MURKOWSKI, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To provide for the conveyance of a Forest Service site in 

Dolores County, Colorado, to be used for a fire station. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘West Fork Fire Sta5 tion Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) COUNTY.—The term ‘‘County’’ means Dolo9 res County, Colorado. 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4609 RS

1 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of Agriculture. 

3 (3) WEST FORK FIRE STATION CONVEYANCE

4 PARCEL.—The term ‘‘West Fork Fire Station Con5 veyance Parcel’’ means the parcel of approximately 

6 3.61 acres of National Forest System land in the 

7 County, as depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Map for 

8 West Fork Fire Station Conveyance Parcel’’ and 

9 dated November 21, 2017. 

10 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF WEST FORK FIRE STATION CON11 VEYANCE PARCEL, DOLORES COUNTY, COLO12 RADO. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—On receipt of a request from the 

14 County and subject to such terms and conditions as are 

15 mutually satisfactory to the Secretary and the County, in16 cluding such additional terms as the Secretary determines 

17 to be necessary, the Secretary shall convey to the County 

18 without consideration all right, title, and interest of the 

19 United States in and to the West Fork Fire Station Con20 veyance Parcel. 

21 (b) COSTS.—Any costs relating to the conveyance 

22 under subsection (a), including processing and transaction 

23 costs, shall be paid by the County. 

24 (c) USE OF LAND.—The land conveyed to the County 

25 under subsection (a) shall be used by the County only for 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4609 RS

1 a fire station, related infrastructure, and roads to facili2 tate access to and through the West Fork Fire Station 

3 Conveyance Parcel. 

4 (d) REVERSION.—If any portion of the land conveyed 

5 under subsection (a) is used in a manner that is incon6 sistent with the use described in subsection (c), the land 

7 shall, at the discretion of the Secretary, revert to the 

8 United States. 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 543 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4609 

AN ACT 

To provide for the conveyance of a Forest Service 

a fire station. site in Dolores County, Colorado, to be used for 

JULY 30, 2018 

Reported without amendment 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 135 (Tuesday, July 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 41349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16627]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8795]

In the Matter of the Designation of the United Self-Defense 
Forces of Colombia aka AUC; aka Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia; as a 
Foreign Terrorist Organization Pursuant to Section 219 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this 
matter, and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary 
of the Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis 
for the designation of the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia as 
foreign terrorist organization have changed in such a manner as to 
warrant revocation of the designation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the United 
Self-Defense Forces of Colombia as a foreign terrorist organization, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as 
amended (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be revoked.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 1, 2014.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-16627 Filed 7-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
# C_2008209EN.01007403.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/74

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 30 June 2008 — Feral v Comité des Régions

(Case F-59/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 209/138)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register, following amicable settlement.

---

(1)  OJ C 199, 25.8.2007, p. 51.

1

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 122 (Wednesday, September 12, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1500-E1501]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          HONORNG MEL BIRDWELL

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. BILL FLORES

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                     Wednesday, September 12, 2012

  Mr. FLORES. Mr. Speaker, today I rise to recognize and honor Mrs. Mel 
Birdwell, the wife of Texas State Senator Brian Birdwell. She has been 
one of the most active and visible spouses of a Hood County elected 
official on the local, state or national level.
  For three years Mrs. Birdwell has served on the board of the 
Republican Women of Hood County. During this time she has assisted with 
expanding the party, as well as, securing copies of the Constitution 
and Declaration of Independence to give to every 5th grade student in 
every Hood County elementary school.
  Mrs. Birdwell has served on the board of the Boys and Girls Club of 
Hood County where she had extensive positive influences for the 
children in our community.
  One of Mrs. Birdwell's most significant accomplishments would be to 
that of her and Senator Birdwell's Face the Fire Ministry. This 
ministry assists burn survivors and wounded servicemen and women and 
their families. Mrs. Birdwell and her husband began this ministry after 
her husband's recovery from severe burns due to the 9/11 terrorist 
attack of the Pentagon. Because her husband's duties as Senator require 
much of his attention, Mel has single-handedly taken charge of the 
ministry.
  Mrs. Birdwell is also a role model for wives and mothers everywhere 
in her loyalty to her husband. When presented by the military with a 
form for her signature which read ``soldier's death imminent within 72 
hours'', Mrs. Birdwell fought for them to do whatever it takes to 
ensure the survival of her husband. Her never ending fight for his life 
and God's intervention is why we have Senator Birdwell with us today.
  In 2002, Mrs. Birdwell was presented with the fourth annual Robertson 
McQuilkin Award for Commitment to Marriage by Family Life Ministries. 
In 2004, the Department of the Army recognized her 17 plus years of 
service to the Army family with the Outstanding Civilian Service Medal.
  Today we recognize and honor Mrs. Mel Birdwell's devotion, dedication 
and loyalty to our Nation, our state, our county, and her family.

[[Page E1501]]

                          ____________________
```
# C_2008116EN.01003601.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/36

---

Action brought on 3 March 2008 — Klein v Commission

(Case F-32/08)

(2008/C 116/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Marie-Claude Klein (Grasse, France) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the appointing authority of 4 May 2007 refusing to recognise the applicant as the beneficiary of a death grant, death allowance and an orphan pension.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision adopted by the Director of the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements of the European Commission of 4 May 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision adopted by the Director of the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements of the European Commission of 4 May 2007;

| — | annul as necessary the decision of the appointing authority rejecting the applicant's complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul as necessary the decision of the appointing authority rejecting the applicant's complaint;

| — | state to the appointing authority the consequences of the annulment of the contested decisions and, in particular, reconsider the applicant's right to death allowance, a death grant and an orphan pension (calculated on the basis of the pension for a first orphan); |
| --- | --- |

—

state to the appointing authority the consequences of the annulment of the contested decisions and, in particular, reconsider the applicant's right to death allowance, a death grant and an orphan pension (calculated on the basis of the pension for a first orphan);

| — | order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
# Mercer - Appalachian Regional Commission

- The Natural Capital Investment Fund: A Path To Success In 2016, the Natural Capital Investment Fund (NCIFund) partnered with the Hatfield McCoy Trail Authority and Southern West Virginia Community and Technical College (Southern) to drive recreational tourism development in the coalfields of southern West Virginia. Through ARC POWER funding, the partners launched a revolving loan fund dedicated to financing and providing business technical assistance [&#8230;]The post The Natural Capital Investment Fund: A Path To Success appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Region I–Planning and Development Council Executive Director Jason Roberts Email &#106;&#x61;&#115;&#x6f;&#110;&#x72;&#111;&#x62;&#101;&#x72;&#116;&#x73;&#64;&#x72;e&#x67;i&#x6f;n&#x6f;n&#x65;p&#100;&#x63;&#46;&#x6f;&#114;&#x67;The post Region I–Planning and Development Council appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00009

- CR

E X PARTE M OHAMMAD R ASHID S ALIM §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 432nd District

Court

of Tarrant County (1487220D)

February 7, 2019

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has conside red the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
# C_2011370EN.01002203.xml

| 17.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2011 — Elliniki Nafpigokataskevastiki and Others v Commission

(Case T-384/08) (1)

1

(State aid - Shipbuilding - Aid granted by the Greek authorities in the form of an indemnification guarantee - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market - Concept of State aid - Imputability to the State - State resources - Private investor test)

2011/C 370/36

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Elliniki Nafpigokataskevastiki AE Chartofylakeiou (Chaidari, Greece); Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft GmbH (Kiel, Germany); and ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: U. Soltész and C. von Köckritz, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, M. Konstantinidis and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Trapeza Peiraios AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by S. Pappas, I. Ktenidis and C. Apalagaki, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Article 16 of Commission Decision 2009/610/EC of 2 July 2008 on the measures C 16/04 (ex NN 29/04, CP 71/02 and CP 133/05) implemented by Greece in favour of Hellenic Shipyards SA (OJ 2009 L 225, p. 104).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Elliniki Nafpigokataskevastiki AE Chartofylakeiou, Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft GmbH and ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems AG to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and by Trapeza Peiraios AE. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Elliniki Nafpigokataskevastiki AE Chartofylakeiou, Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft GmbH and ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems AG to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and by Trapeza Peiraios AE.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 22.11.2008.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for iPayment, Inc. (Issuer) for the period
ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report):

(a) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

This Certification is executed as of August 14, 2003.

|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Gregory S. Daily                                 
|                                                     
|Gregory S. Daily
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Page 24 of 25
EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



EXHIBIT 32.1



I, Craig H. Barratt, the chief executive officer of Atheros Communications, Inc. (the
Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge,:



|(i) | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 10, 2005



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Craig H. Barratt                 
|Craig H. Barratt                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 118 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1424-E1425]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    INVEST IN A CLEAN ENERGY FUTURE!

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. BOB FILNER

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, August 2, 2012

  Mr. FILNER. Mr. Speaker, I have introduced the Clean Energy Victory 
Bonds Act. (H.R. 6275) The purpose of this legislation is to invest in 
a clean energy future.
  This legislation will allow all Americans to invest in new clean 
energy technologies that will create over 1.7 million competitive 
American

[[Page E1425]]

jobs, increase energy security, and secure our nation's competitiveness 
in the rapidly growing field of clean energy technologies.
  With Clean Energy Victory Bonds, today's Americans can invest in our 
nation's future, and ensure that the American economy remains 
competitive for generations to come. Funds raised from Clean Energy 
Victory Bonds would:
  Create billions of dollars in incentives to accelerate the 
development of clean energy and energy efficiency technologies;
  Create over 1.7 million new American jobs;
  Ensure that the U.S. is a world leader in this increasingly crucial 
and competitive sector;
  Reduce U.S. dependence on foreign sources of energy;
  Allow Americans a safe opportunity to invest in the future of their 
country.
  The Clean Energy Victory Bonds Act draws on the powerful history of 
Americans investing together to ensure our nation's victories. During 
World War II, millions of Americans purchased Victory Bonds, raising 
over $185 billion for the war effort, the equivalent of over $2 
trillion in today's dollars.

                          ____________________
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marshall Jenkins, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of burglary in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first degree arising out of his attempted robbery of a night clerk at the *649Econo Lodge Motel in the City of Utica during the early morning hours of July 30,1988. Defendant was apprehended a short distance from the motel and was taken back to the motel where a showup occurred within twenty minutes of the attempted robbery. Defendant contends that the showup to a group of witnesses was unduly suggestive. Although simultaneous showups are generally frowned upon *(People v Adams,*53 NY2d 241, 249), procedures which are less than ideal are tolerable in the interest of prompt identification, particularly where, as here, the suspect is captured close in time and proximity to the scene of the crime *(see, People v Duuvon,*77 NY2d 541; *People v Love,*57 NY2d 1023, 1024-1025; *People v Burns,*133 AD2d 642, *lv denied*70 NY2d 873). Furthermore, the showup was not unduly suggestive even though the defendant was handcuffed and seated in a police car when the witnesses viewed him *(see, People v Burns, supra; People v Johnson,*102 AD2d 616, 627). In our view, the showup procedure employed by the police was justified in the interest of prompt identification *(see, People v Love, supra; People v Burns, supra; see also, People v Manuel,*170 AD2d 980).

We agree with defendant that the police officers were improperly allowed to bolster the identification of him made by the night clerk and the security guard. However, no objection was made to this testimony and, thus, this issue has not been properly preserved for appellate review *(see, People v West,*56 NY2d 662, 663). In any event, even though this testimony was clearly improper *(see, People v Johnson,*57 NY2d 969, 970; *People v Trowbridge,*305 NY 471; *People v Love,*135 AD2d 1099), in view of the compelling identification testimony and the overwhelming evidence of guilt, the error was harmless *(see, People v Johnson, supra,*at 970-971; *People v Love, supra).*

Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the evidence was legally sufficient to support defendant’s conviction and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. We have reviewed the other claims of error made by defendant and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Buckley, J. — Burglary, 1st Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.
ATTACHMENT G

Letter dated September 27, 2007, submitted by 

Chemstone in support of its BARTdetermination 

(comments on draft permit)
OIV

O-N MINERALS

CHEMSTONE OPERATIONS

1696 ORANDA ROAD

PO BOX 71

STRASBURG, VA 22657

0-" ..IN L. TEL 540-465-5161

FAX 540-465-5150

www.oglebaynorton.com

September 27, 2007

Ms. Laura R. Justin

Environmental Engineer Senior

DEQ -ValleyRegional Office

P.O. Box 3000

4411 Early Road

Harrisonburg, VA 22801

RE: Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Draft Permit

O-N Minerals (Chemstone) 80252 - Strasburg, Virginia

Shenandoah County Registration No.: 80252 Plant ID No.: 51-171-0003

Dear Ms. Justin:

Thank you for the opportunity to review and provide comments regarding this draft

BART permit and request that you consider the following suggested changes. We are

responding to provide comments on the draft Best Available Retrofit Technology

(BART) permit we received on September 19,2007 for our Strasburg facility. We

request the following changes:

1. Re-title the OM&M Plan to "BART Monitoring Plan."

(Condition 9)

2. On conditions 19 and 20, consider revising the sentence as follows: "Hourly emission

limits represent averages for at least a three-hour sampling period."

3. In Condition 19,re-title the Paragraph as "Preliminary Process Emission Limits:

Rotary Kiln".

Add at the end of the same paragraph:

"DEQ shall establish final process emission limits for PM and N02 under this paragraph

based on at least three stack tests and the "BART Monitoring Plan."

4. In Paragraph 20, re-title the Paragraph as "PreliminaryProcess Emission Limits:

Calcimatic Kiln".
O-N Minerals (Chemstone) Company - Strasburg BART September 27,2007

DEQ -Valley Regional Office

Page 20f2

Add at the end of the same paragraph: "DEQ shall establish final process emission limits

for PM and N02 under this paragraph based on at least three stack tests and the "BART

Monitoring Plan."

Since our Calcimatic Kiln is not operating currently we request alternate permit language

requiring compliance testing only in the years that we are operating and to allow for

conducting compliance testing within 60 days of startup of the facility.

We appreciate the opportunity to provide comment on the Strasburg facility's draft

BART permit. If you have any questions or comments regarding the requests presented

in this document, please do not hesitate to call me at (540) 465-6822.

Sincerely,

/~fTKarl D. Everett, PE

Senior Environmental Health & Safety Manager

Attachment

cc: Ms. Sharon Foley, PE; VDEQ
Attached as Exhibit

                                                                      Exhibit 21
               List of Subsidiaries of Monocacy Bancshares, Inc.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                 State of                  Owned                     Percentage
 Name                         Incorporation                  By                       Ownership
 ----                         --------------              -------                    ----------
<S><C>
 Taneytown Bank
 & Trust Company                Maryland          Monocacy Bancshares, Inc.             100%

 TBT Investments, Inc.          Delaware          Taneytown Bank & Trust Company        100%

 TBT Insurance, Inc.            Maryland          Taneytown Bank & Trust Company        100%

 TBT Title Holdings,
 Inc.                           Maryland          Taneytown Bank & Trust Company        100%

 TBT Title I, Inc.              Maryland          TBT Title Holdings, Inc.              100%

 TBT Title II, Inc.             Maryland          TBT Title Holdings, Inc.              100%

 TBT Title III, Inc.            Maryland          TBT Title Holdings, Inc.              100%

 TBT Title IV, Inc.             Maryland          TBT Title Holdings, Inc.              100%

 TBT Title V, Inc.              Maryland          TBT Title Holdings, Inc.              100%

 TBT Title VI, Inc.             Maryland          TBT Title Holdings, Inc.              100%


</TABLE>