alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 25, 2002


Ms. Cynthia Reis	Via UPS
LaSalle Bank National Association	(312) 904-7830
ABS Trust Services Group
135 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1625
Chicago, IL
USA	60603-0000


Bear Stearns Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., Corporate Lease-Backed
Certificates, Series 1999-CLF1
Pooling and Servicing Agreement

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the referenced Trust (the "PSA"), it is hereby certified that (i) the undersigned has completed a review of the servicer's performance of its obligations under the PSA for the preceding calendar year; (ii)to the best of the undersigned's knowledge on the basis of that review the servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the PSA throughout such period in all material respects; (iii) to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, the subservicer, of the servicer under the PSA, if any, has fulfilled its obligations under its sub-servicing agreement in all material respects; and, (iv) no notice has been received from any governmental agency or body which would indicate a challenge or question as to the status of the Trust's qualification as a REMIC under the U.S. Code.
cc:
	Attn: Senior Managing Director Mortgages Dept.
	Bear Stearns Commercial Securities Inc.
	383 Madison Avenue
	New York, NY 10179-0000


A PNC Real Estate Finance Company
210 West 10th Street Kansas City Missouri 64105
www.midlandis.com 816 435 5000 T816 435 2326 F
EXHIBIT 10.33


 


THE SCO
GROUP, INC.


 


SUMMARY
OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION


 


The compensation and benefits for service as a member
of the Board of Directors is determined by the Nominations Committee.  Effective May 25, 2004, a director who is an
officer or employee of the Company or its subsidiaries is not compensated for
service on the Board of Directors or on any Committee of the Board.  The Company’s non-employee directors
currently receive $25,000 for each year of service as a director plus an
additional $5,000 per year for each committee of the Board on which such
non-employee directors serve. 
Additionally, the chairpersons of each of the Compensation Committee and
the Nominations Committee will receive an additional $5,000 per year and the
chairpersons of each of the Audit Committee and the Litigation Oversight
Committee will receive an additional $10,000 per year.  In addition, Board members will be reimbursed
for expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board and committee
meetings.  Directors also receive stock
option awards under the Company’s stock option plans, which awards currently
include an initial option to purchase 45,000 shares of common stock upon
joining the Board as a director and thereafter each non-employee director who
continues to serve on the Board will automatically receive an annual grant of
an option to acquire 15,000 shares upon his or her election at the Company’s
annual meeting.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 8, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 132385 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, DOUGLAS D. JONES, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132385 COA: 268929 Wexford CC: 05-018785-NI KATHLEEN P. OLSON and TODD R. OLSON, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consider ed. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the applicati on or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court’s gran t of the defendants’ motion for summary disposition, in light of Kreiner v Fischer and Straub v Collette , 471 Mich 109 (2004). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they
should not submit mere restatemen ts of their application papers.

d0605 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 8, 2007

Clerk
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JAM ES RAY BOOTH , App ellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 22

- 1394 LT Case No. 2006

- CF

- 002030

- A STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. _______________________________/ Decision filed August 2, 2022 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County , Daniel B

. Merritt, J r., J udge. James R ay Booth, Daytona Beach, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. AFF IRMED.

WALLIS , EDWARDS and HARRIS , JJ. , conc ur.
# C_2010209EN.01003701.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 June 2010 — Luxembourg v Commission

(Case T-549/08) (1)

1

(ESF - Suspension of financial aid - Campaign against discrimination and inequality in the employment market - Serious failings in the system of management and monitoring which could lead to systemic irregularities - Article 39(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 - Legitimate expectations)

2010/C 209/55

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: M. Fisch, acting as Agent, and P. Kinsch, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė and B. Conte, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 5383 of 24 September 2008 on the suspension of interim payments from the European Social Fund (ESF) to the single programming document for Community structural interventions falling under Objective No 3 to Luxembourg, and Commission Decision C(2008) 5730 of 6 October 2008 on the suspension of interim payments from the Community initiative to combat discrimination and inequality in the employment market (EQUAL) to Luxembourg.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009.

1

---
# C_2011347EN.01002703.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2011 — SLV Elektronik v OHIM — Jiménez Muñoz (LINE)

(Case T-449/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark LINE - Earlier national word and figurative marks Line - Partial refusal to register - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2011/C 347/41

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: SLV Elektronik GmbH (Übach-Palenberg, Germany) (represented by: C. König, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Manea, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Angel Jiménez Muñoz (Gelida, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 July 2008 (case R 759/2007-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Angel Jiménez Muñoz and SLV Elektronik GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 18 July 2008 (case R 759/2007-4) in so far as concerns the goods ‘mains-operated lights, lighting apparatus and installations, stage effects lighting apparatus; electric lamps; individual parts for the aforesaid goods’ in Class 11; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 18 July 2008 (case R 759/2007-4) in so far as concerns the goods ‘mains-operated lights, lighting apparatus and installations, stage effects lighting apparatus; electric lamps; individual parts for the aforesaid goods’ in Class 11;

| 2. | orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 327, 20.12.2008.

1

---
Exhibit 10.13 to IntriCon Corporation Form 10-K dated December 31, 2004





EXHIBIT 10.13  



Summary Sheet for Director Fees 



The Chairman of the Board receives an annual retainer of $145,200 for
services performed as such including meeting fees. The other directors who were not employees of IntriCon Corporation (the
“Company”) receive an annual retainer of $24,000 plus $800 per Board or Committee meeting attended on a particular day
and $400 for each additional Board or Committee meeting attended on the same day, except for meetings of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee, where no per meeting compensation is received. The Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an
additional $2,000 per meeting for his services as such. In 2005, Mr. Masucci will also receive $50,000 for services associated
with assisting with the sale of the Company’s discontinued burners and component operation. Under the Company’s
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, directors who are not employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries receive an
automatic one-time grant of an option to acquire 5,000 Common Shares of the Company upon their initial election or appointment to
the Board of Directors and are also eligible to receive discretionary grants.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>	                          <C>		
<PERIOD-TYPE>	               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>	      DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>            DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                         5557
<SECURITIES>                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                 57989
<ALLOWANCES>                   2300
<INVENTORY>                   48005
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             113427
<PP&E>                         88533
<DEPRECIATION>                32836
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               182897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         70460
<BONDS>                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0
<PREFERRED>                       0
<COMMON>                        117
<OTHER-SE>                   101018 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 182897 
<SALES>                      784219
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             784219
<CGS>                        673407
<TOTAL-COSTS>                765634
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              (176)
<LOSS-PROVISION>               1150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              627
<INCOME-PRETAX>               18134
<INCOME-TAX>                   7145
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           10989
<DISCONTINUED>                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                         0
<NET-INCOME>                  10989
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .94
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dresser, Inc. (Dresser) for the period ended
September 30, 2005 (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Dresser as of the dates and for the periods presented in such Report.



Dated: February 9, 2006



/s/    ROBERT D.
WOLTILRobert D. Woltil Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
June 12, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption No. 11741 issued pursuant to Section 333 

of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 in Regulatory Docket 

No. FAA-2015-0892

Dear Sir or Madam:

Witt Tech LLC was issued Exemption No. 11741 (hereinafter the Exemption) for the 

purpose of conducting aerial data collection. Witt Tech LLC herby requests an 

amendment to the Exemption to allow an additional model of unmanned aircraft system 

(UAS) that fully complies with the conditions of the Exemption. 

Witt Tech LLC wishes to operate the Solo quadcopter-type UAV, manufactured by 3D 

Robotics, under the same terms and conditions contained in the Exemption. Submitted 

separately as a confidential document to 333exemptions@faa.gov is the Solo Aircraft 

Description and Operations Manual (Witt Tech LLC requests the FAA treat this 

document as proprietary under 14 C.F.R. 11.35(b) and not include it in the public 

docket). All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of 

the Exemption.

Witt Tech LLC believes that the addition of the Solo is within the public's interest, as it 

would offer additional opportunities in aerial data collection while reducing the risk to 

persons and property inherent in the use of manned aircraft. 

Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions concerning this request for an 

amendment to the Exemption.

Best Regards,

Trevor D Witt

President, Witt Tech LLC
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 16

- 00417

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E .J., J.J., V.J., AND C.J.X., CHILDREN

,

From the 85th District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 000408

- CV

- 85

ORDER

Appellants ’ pro se response to their counsel’s Anders brief was due March 7, 2017.

They request an extension of time in the amount of 20 days to file the response.

Appellants’ request is granted. The pro se response is due March 27, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

J ustice Scoggins

Motion granted

Order issued and filed March 22 , 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Combined Financial Statements at June 30, 1997 for the year ended June 30, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000909124
<NAME>              ALTON REAL ESTATE
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,414
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                        89
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,377
<PP&E>                                          24,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,457
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            65
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,288
<SALES>                                         22,197
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,774
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                       245
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,602
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Vaiaso

25370

01/13/2005

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4511 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4511

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit former Members of 
  Congress from lobbying Members, officers, or employees of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2017

   Mr. Blum introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit former Members of 
  Congress from lobbying Members, officers, or employees of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Golden Parachutes for Public 
Service Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST LOBBYING OF CONGRESS BY FORMER MEMBERS.

    (a) Senators.--Section 207(e)(1)(A) of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``within 2 years''.
    (b) Members and Officers of the House of Representatives.--Section 
207(e)(1)(B)(i) of such title is amended by striking ``within 1 year''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to 
individuals who leave office on or after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2009312EN.01004301.xml

| 19.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/43

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 22 October 2009 — Aayhan and Others v European Parliament

(Case F-10/08) (1)

1

(No need to adjudicate)

2009/C 312/70

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Laleh Aayhan (Strasbourg, France) and Others (represented by: R. Blindauer, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Mustapha-Pacha and R. Ignătescu, later by R. Ignătescu and S. Seyr, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the European Parliament's decision of 25 October 2007 rejecting the complaint brought by the applicants on 21 June 2007 for the purpose of having all the fixed-term contracts between them and the Parliament converted into a single contract for an indefinite period.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate in Case F-10/08 Aayhan and Others v Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate in Case F-10/08 Aayhan and Others v Parliament;

| 2. | The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay the European Parliament's costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay the European Parliament's costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 64, 8.03.2008, p. 70

1

---
Exhibit 32        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFCIER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly Report of TheraBiogen, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, Kelly T. Hickel, Chief Executive Officer and Robert Hipple, principal
financial officer,  certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

May 15, 2009

/s/ Kelly T. Hickel
--------------------------------------
Kelly T. Hickel
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Robert Hipple
--------------------------------------
Robert Hipple
Principal Financial Officer
# C_2009282EN.01004301.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/43

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 October 2009 — Commission v Roodhuijzen

(Case T-58/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff case - Officials - Social security - Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme - Insurance cover for the unmarried partner of an official)

2009/C 282/80

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Anton Pieter Roodhuijzen (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 27 November 2007 in Case F-122/06 Roodhuijzen v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking annulment of that judgment.

Roodhuijzen

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Anton Pieter Roodhuijzen in connection with the present instance. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Anton Pieter Roodhuijzen in connection with the present instance.

---

(1)  OJ C 92, 12.4.2008.

1

---