alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


1.   Western Energy Management, Inc., is a Delaware corporation and is a wholly
     owned subsidiary of Onsite.

2.   Onsite/TCC Corp. ("Onsite/TCC") is a Delaware corporation and was a wholly
     owned subsidiary of Onsite until February 1997.

3.   Television  City Cogen, L.P. ("TCC"), is a California Limited Partnership.
     Onsite, directly  or  through  Onsite/TCC,  owned  all  of the general and
     limited partnership interests in TCC until February 1997.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00560

- CV

Jermar FLUCKERS

, Appellant

v.

SILVER RIDGE APARTMENTS

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CV03295

Honorable Jason Wolff, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED November 25, 2015.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
IB 

Union Calendar No. 601 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4528 

[Report No. 115–775] 

To make technical amendments to certain marine fish conservation statutes, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 1, 2017 

Mr. SOTO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

JUNE 22, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS_GL
2 

•HR 4528 RH

A BILL 

To make technical amendments to certain marine fish 

conservation statutes, and for other purposes. 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS_GL
3 

•HR 4528 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BILLFISH CONSERVATION ACT OF 2012. 

4 Section 4(c)(1) of the Billfish Conservation Act of 

5 2012 (16 U.S.C. 1827a(c)(1)) is amended by inserting 

6 ‘‘and retained’’ after ‘‘landed’’. 

7 SEC. 2. SHARK CONSERVATION ACT OF 2010. 

8 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to amend the High Seas 

9 Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act and the Mag10 nuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 

11 to improve the conservation of sharks’’, approved January 

12 4, 2011 (Public Law 111–348; 124 Stat. 3668), is amend13 ed— 

14 (1) by striking section 104 and inserting the 

15 following: 

16 ‘‘SEC. 104. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

17 ‘‘Nothing in this title or the amendments made by 

18 this title shall be construed as affecting, altering, or di19 minishing in any way the authority of the Secretary of 

20 Commerce to establish such conservation and management 

21 measures as the Secretary considers necessary and appro22 priate under sections 302(a)(3) and 304(g) of the Magnu23 son-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 

24 (16 U.S.C. 1852(a)(3), 1854(g)).’’; and 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS_GL
4 

•HR 4528 RH

1 (2) in section 1, by striking the item relating to 

2 section 104 and inserting the following: 

‘‘Sec. 104. Rule of construction.’’. 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS_GL

tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS_GL
Union Calendar No. 601 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4528 

[Report No. 115–775] 

A BILL 

fish conservation statutes, and for other purposes. 

To make technical amendments to certain marine 

JUNE 22, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS_GL
**Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 May 2009 – Commission v Spain**

**(Case C‐266/08)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2004/81/EC – Residence permit issued to third-country nationals who are victims of trafficking in human beings or who have been the subject
of an action to facilitate illegal immigration, who cooperate with the competent authorities – Failure to transpose completely – Failure to communicate the measures to transpose the directive

1.                     *Member States – Obligations – Implementation of directives – Failure to fulfil obligations – National system pleaded as justification
– Not permissible (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 11)*

2.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration
– Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see paras 14-16)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Council Directive 2004/81/EC of 29 April 2004 on the residence permit issued to third‐country nationals who are victims of trafficking in human beings or who have been the subject of an action to facilitate illegal immigration, who cooperate with the competent authorities (OJ 2004 L 261, p. 19). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2004/81/EC of 29 April 2004 on the residence permit issued to third-country nationals who are victims of trafficking in human beings or who have been the subject of an action to facilitate illegal immigration, who cooperate with the competent authorities, and by failing to communicate to the Commission of the European Communities the provisions of national law intended to contribute to ensuring such compliance, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
#### Edward W. Hartford, Jr., et al., Respondents, v Seneca Meadows, Inc., Defendant, Syracuse Scale Co., Inc., Appellant, and Weldtec Scales, Respondent-Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the follow*582ing Memorandum: The summary judgment motions of Syracuse and Weldtec should have been granted in their entirety. The moving defendants sustained their initial burden of demonstrating, as a matter of law, that they cannot be held liable for plaintiff’s injuries. They submitted plaintiff’s EBT testimony, in which he unequivocally admitted that he slipped or tripped in the middle of the old scale, while he was several steps away from the new scale manufactured and installed by defendants. Plaintiff testified that the new scale was not involved in the accident. Plaintiff’s unequivocal admissions against his own interest are competent to establish the moving defendants’ entitlement to judgment by demonstrating the lack of causal relationship between the alleged defects in the new scale and plaintiff’s injuries.

Plaintiff’s and Seneca’s showing in opposition was insufficient to defeat the motions. San Pietro’s EBT testimony, that plaintiff fell either on the old scale or on the new scale, indicates merely the witness’s inability to recall or describe the fall, and does not raise a question of fact. The EBT testimony of Booth perhaps raises a factual question but it is not a material question of fact. According to Booth, plaintiff slipped or fell from the gas tank or step of his cab and was not standing on the new scale when he fell. Thus, Booth’s testimony does not support the theory that plaintiff’s injuries were caused by the new scale. In the absence of evidence in the record to demonstrate that plaintiff fell on the new scale or that the new scale contributed to his injuries, Weldtec and Syracuse must be absolved of liability. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Wayne County, Parenti, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.2****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Clay M. Whitson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of iPayment, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 12, 2007 By: /s/ Clay M. Whitson         Clay M. Whitson    Chief Financial Officer  
27
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for iPayment, Inc. (Issuer) for the period
ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report):



| | (a) |  | fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Issuer.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification is executed as of
November 14, 2003.

/s/ Clay M. WhitsonClay M. WhitsonChief Financial Officer


Page 27 of 27
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1461-E1462]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        HONORING FANNIE SHERIDAN

                                 ______
                                 

                  HON. HENRY C. ``HANK'' JOHNSON, JR.

                               of georgia

                    in the house of representatives

                       Monday, September 10, 2012

  Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I present the following U.S. 
Citizen of Distinction.
  Whereas, our lives have been touched by the life of this one woman . 
. . who has given of herself to her community, church and family; and
  Whereas, Mrs. Fannie Sheridan's spirit is present in DeKalb County, 
Georgia for all to see, being a mother, a community worker, neighbor 
and friend; and
  Whereas, this giant of a woman was born in Eufula, Alabama to Maceo 
and Loftie Tennelle on October 12, 1925, she has been on the move ever 
since as a woman of God, touching lives in Alabama, Chicago, Illinois, 
Gary, Indiana and Decatur, Georgia; and
  Whereas, this remarkable woman gave of herself, her time, her talent 
and her life; she never asked for fame or fortune just fairness for the 
people, she was our quiet storm, a spark that starts a flame; and
  Whereas, Mrs. Fannie Sheridan led by doing behind the scenes, she 
encouraged all those around her who wanted to make a difference, be it 
her family, her elected officials,

[[Page E1462]]

her neighbors and her church members at Saint Philip AME Church; she 
was a virtuous woman, a woman of great integrity who remained true to 
the uplifting of her community and our district; and
  Whereas, the U.S. Representative of the Fourth District of Georgia 
has set aside this day to bestow a Congressional Recognition on Mrs. 
Fannie Sheridan for her leadership, friendship and service to all of 
the citizens throughout the Nation; a citizen of great worth and so 
noted distinction;
  Now therefore, I, Henry C. ``Hank'' Johnson, Jr., do hereby attest to 
the 112th Congress that Mrs. Fannie Sheridan of Decatur, DeKalb County, 
Georgia is deemed worthy and deserving of this ``Congressional 
Recognition'': Mrs. Fannie Sheridan, U.S. Citizen of Distinction in the 
Fourth Congressional District of Georgia.
  Proclaimed, this 13th day of July, 2012.

                          ____________________
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 249 (Friday, December 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 90218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28731]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail, USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] & 
Parcel Select Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 29, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 21, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail, USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] & 
Parcel Select Contract 2 to Competitive Product List. Documents are 
available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-133, CP2024-139.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-28731 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
================================================================================


                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tari Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.       The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,   in  all
         material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.



Date:  November 14, 2005


                                               /s/  Theodore Tsagkaris

                                               ------------------------------
                                               Theodore Tsagkaris
                                               Secretary, Treasurer & C.F.O.
                                               (Principal Financial Officer and
                                               Principal Accounting Officer)
# Cocke - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Great Smoky Mountains: Adventure Creates Opportunity in Tennessee In the Great Smoky Mountains, Cocke County is using ARC support on a new biking trail.The post Great Smoky Mountains: Adventure Creates Opportunity in Tennessee appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- East Tennessee Development District Executive Director Rick Yakubic Email &#x72;&#x79;&#97;&#107;ub&#x69;&#x63;&#x40;&#101;td&#x64;&#x2e;&#x6f;&#114;&#103;The post East Tennessee Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smith Barney Tidewater Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jerry Pascucci, President and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jerry Pascucci
Jerry Pascucci
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
President and Director

Date:May 15, 2008

---
EXHIBIT 13.1

906 Certification

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company
Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Rong Guangdao, the Chairman of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Date: May 19, 2009



By:

/s/ Rong GuangdaoName: Title:

Rong Guangdao Chairman
United States Court of Appeals 

For the First Circuit 

Nos. 17-1137 

 17-1590 

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Appellee, 

v. 

AMIT KANODIA, 

Defendant, Appellant. 

ERRATA SHEET

 The opinion of this Court, issued on November 22, 2019, is 

amended as follows: 

On page 5, line 3: "an expiration dates" is replaced with "an 

expiration date"
#### Charles P. Kelly, Appellant, v Timothy Joseph et al., Respondents.

Mahoney, P. J.

Appeals (transferred to this court by order of the Appellate Division, Second Department) (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court (King, J.), entered March 1, 1990 in Dutchess County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Beacon granting an area variance to respondent Richard Yeaple Jr., and (2) from a judgment of said court, entered July 27, 1990 in Dutchess County, which, upon reargument, adhered to its prior decision.

On July 11, 1989, respondent Richard Yeaple Jr. applied to respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Beacon (hereinafter the ZBA) in Dutchess County for an area variance for a 50-foot-wide parcel of land located at 10 Aldridge Place, in contemplation of purchasing the lot from respondent Timothy Joseph. The City’s zoning ordinance required minimum side yard setbacks of 15 feet with a total minimum side yard of 40 feet. Yeaple’s application proposed an L-shaped, conventionally framed ranch 24 feet wide. The side yards would be 10 feet on one side and 16 feet on the opposite side.

After review of the proposed building plans, the ZBA was persuaded that Yeaple would suffer practical difficulties and economic hardship without a variance and, further, that a grant of variance would not adversely impact the neighborhood. Accordingly, the application was granted. Petitioner, an adjoining landowner, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the ZBA’s determination. Supreme Court upheld the ZBA’s decision and, upon granting reargument, adhered to its original decision. These appeals ensued.

We affirm. As Supreme Court noted, the subject parcel is situated in a residential zone and is useless unless a residence can be built on the lot. Further, despite petitioner’s arguments to the contrary, the record shows that when Joseph offered to purchase a 25-foot-wide strip of adjacent land from petitioner, *489petitioner demanded $50,000 as the selling price; yet, petitioner offered to buy the lot at issue for $5,000. Thus, petitioner’s own evaluation supports the rational basis upon which Supreme Court concluded that evidence of economic injury was self-evident *(see, Matter of Cowan v Kern,*41 NY2d 591, 598). We also note that the property at issue is 50 feet wide and the ordinance requires 40 feet of total side yardage. In order to meet the zoning requirements, Yeaple would have to build a 10-foot-wide house. Where, as here, an applicant cannot utilize his property without coming into conflict with the zoning ordinance, a practical difficulty, essential to the grant of an area variance, exists which justifies the relief requested *(see, Conley v Town of Brookhaven Zoning Bd. of Appeals,*40 NY2d 309, 314). We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them without merit. Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich Jr. and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgments are affirmed, without costs.