alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 249 (Friday, December 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 90218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28735]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 29, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 19, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 150 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-128, CP2024-134.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-28735 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2018166EN.01003901.xml

| 14.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/39

---

Action brought on 9 March 2018 — VP v Cedefop

(Case T-187/18)

(2018/C 166/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: VP (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the present appeal admissible and founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the present appeal admissible and founded;

| — | annul the decision of 12 May 2017 of the defendant rejecting the request of the applicant to renew the employment contract for an indefinite period; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 12 May 2017 of the defendant rejecting the request of the applicant to renew the employment contract for an indefinite period;

| — | annul the decision of 1 December 2017 of the defendant rejecting the complaint of the applicant of 9 August 2017 against the decision of 12 May 2017; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 1 December 2017 of the defendant rejecting the complaint of the applicant of 9 August 2017 against the decision of 12 May 2017;

| — | order the compensation of the immaterial damage suffered by the applicant, evaluated ex aequo et bono to 100 000 (one hundred thousand) euros; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the compensation of the immaterial damage suffered by the applicant, evaluated ex aequo et bono to 100 000 (one hundred thousand) euros;

| — | order the compensation of the material damage suffered by the applicant; and |
| --- | --- |

—

order the compensation of the material damage suffered by the applicant; and

| — | order the reimbursement of all the costs incurred by the applicant for the present appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the reimbursement of all the costs incurred by the applicant for the present appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law, alleging that: the decision of the defendant not to renew the employment contract of the applicant was adopted in violation of the right to be heard, the obligation of duty of care, the obligation to state reasons, in violation of the duty to hear the immediate superior; it suffers under a manifest error of appreciation and is vitiated by a misuse of powers.

---
**Order of the President of the of the Court of First Instance of 30 June 2009 – Tudapetrol Mineralölerzeugnisse Nils Hansen
v Commission**

**(Case T-550/08 R)**

Application for interim measures – Commission decision imposing a fine – Application for suspension of operation of the measure and interim relief (repayment of the fine already paid and waiver
of a bank guarantee) – No prima facie case and no urgency

1.                     *Application for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Prima
facie case – Urgency – Serious and irreparable damage – Cumulative nature – Balancing of all the interests involved – Order
of examination and method of verification – Discretion of the judge dealing with the application for interim relief (Arts
225(1) EC, 242 EC and 243 EC; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 10-13)*

2.                     *Application for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Suspension of the obligation to provide a bank guarantee
as a condition for not requiring immediate payment of a fine – Conditions for granting – Serious and irreparable damage (Art.
242 EC) (see paras 40-45)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for suspension of the operation of Commission Decision C(2008) 5476 final of 1 October 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement in Case COMP/39181 – Candle waxes, in so far as it imposes a fine on the applicant, application to release the applicant from the obligation to provide a bank guarantee as a condition for release from the obligation of payment, and other applications for interim measures. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Costs are reserved. |
# C_2008272EN.01003302.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/33

---

Action brought on 12 August 2008 — Veromar di Tudisco Alfio & Salvatore v Commission

(Case T-313/08)

(2008/C 272/61)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Veromar di Tudisco Alfio & Salvatore Snc (Catania, Italy) (represented by: A. Maiorana, A. De Matteis and A. De Francesco, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Commission Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 of 12 June 2008, published in Official Journal L 155 of 13 June 2008. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Commission Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 of 12 June 2008, published in Official Journal L 155 of 13 June 2008.

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-305/08 Italian Republic v Commission. In particular, infringement of Article 12 of the EC Treaty is alleged. In that regard, the applicant submits that the contested regulation discriminates in favour of the Kingdom of Spain, the quota for which was deemed to be exhausted on 23 June 2008 and not 16 June 2008.

Italian Republic

Commission

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES—OXLEY ACT OF 2004**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Bancshares California (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curtis S. Reis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that: 

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof and for the periods covered in the Report. 

 

 

Date: August 15, 2005

 

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of the written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Alliance Bancshares California and will beretained by Alliance Bancshares California and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

The foregoing certifications being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-QSB and shall not be considered as part of the Form10-QSB.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,430                   1,864
<SECURITIES>                                         0                   1,962
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,049                  11,884
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,742                  17,618
<PP&E>                                         278,197                 328,836
<DEPRECIATION>                               (102,298)               (118,624)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,042                 230,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,309                  10,956
<BONDS>                                        107,403                 122,777
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           202                     203
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,119                  81,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,042                 230,041
<SALES>                                         40,903                  54,272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,903                  54,272
<CGS>                                           12,457                  13,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,574                  37,419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,140                   8,476
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    281                   9,389
<INCOME-TAX>                                       112                   3,483
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                169                   5,906
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,611                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       836                   5,906
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05                     .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05                     .29
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                           20251
<SECURITIES>                                     10211
<RECEIVABLES>                                    18435
<ALLOWANCES>                                       156
<INVENTORY>                                       9990
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 63586
<PP&E>                                           40638
<DEPRECIATION>                                   16962
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  112102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            12715
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         83230
<OTHER-SE>                                       12351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    112102
<SALES>                                         111392
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                111987
<CGS>                                            48477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    48477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 47835
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  17968
<INCOME-TAX>                                      6755
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              11213
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     11213
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .82


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 119 (Tuesday, August 7, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5719]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              S E N A T E

Vol. 158

WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, AUGUST 7, 2012

No. 119
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 249 (Friday, December 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 90191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28722]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Small Business: Topics in Anti-Infective Therapeutics.
    Date: January 10, 2024.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Marcus Ferrone, PHARMD Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-2371, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cba6aab9a8beb8e5adaeb9b9a4a5ae8ba5a2a3e5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b565a49584e48155d5e494954555e7b555253155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 22, 2023.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-28722 Filed 12-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Douglas - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Atlanta Regional Commission Executive Director Anna Roach Email &#105;&#x6e;&#102;&#x6f;&#99;&#x65;&#110;&#x74;e&#x72;&#64;&#x61;t&#x6c;a&#110;&#x74;&#97;&#x72;&#101;&#x67;&#105;&#x6f;&#110;&#x61;l&#x2e;o&#x72;gThe post Atlanta Regional Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

 

(1) Form S-8 No. 333-125698 dated June 10, 2005 pertaining to the 2005 Stock Option Plan of Cheetah Oil & Gas Ltd., and

(2) Form S-8 No. 333-113084 dated February 25, 2004 pertaining to the 2004 Equity Performance Plan of Cheetah Oil & Gas Ltd.,

 

of our report dated April 9, 2007, with respect to the consolidated statements of Cheetah Oil & Gas Ltd, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

 
| Vancouver, Canada April 13, 2007 | Ernst & Young LLP Chartered Accountants |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                             |                                        |
# C_2008236EN.01001402.xml

| 13.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/14

---

Action brought on 14 July 2008 — X Technology Swiss v OHIM — Ipko-Amcor (First-On-Skin)

(Case T-273/08)

(2008/C 236/24)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: X Technology Swiss GmbH (Wollerau, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Herbertz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Ipko-Amcor BV (Zoetermeer, Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Amend the decision delivered on 15 May 2008 by the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM in Case R 281/2007-4 in such a way that the opposition is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

—

Amend the decision delivered on 15 May 2008 by the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM in Case R 281/2007-4 in such a way that the opposition is rejected.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘First-On-Skin’ for goods in Classes 18, 23 and 25 (Application for Registration No 4 019 981).

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Ipko-Amcor BV.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark ‘FIRST’ for goods in Class 25 (Benelux Registration No 401 666), the objection having been lodged against registration for goods in Class 25.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the decision of the Opposition Division.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: There is no likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.

Pleas in law:

---
#### Junior Roscoe HELTERBRAND, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-13058.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 13, 1961.

Fred W. Whetsel, McAlester, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., W. H. Layden, County Atty., Pittsburg Co., Mc-Alester, for defendant in error.

BUSSEY, Judge.

Petitioner in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged by information in the district court of Pittsburg County with the offense of burglary in the second degree while acting in concert with one Teddy Gordon McGuire. A severance was granted, and the defendant was tried before a jury on November 17, 1960, whereupon defendant was found guilty and sentenced to serve a term of two years in the state penitentiary. Defendant then filed a motion for new trial, and upon the overruling of said *motion*attempts to appeal to this court.

The petition in error with casemade attached was filed in this court May 18, 1961. Oral arguments were set for July 26, 1961, at which time neither the defendant nor his attorney appeared. Nor were briefs submitted by either the defendant or the Attorney General. The case was thereupon submitted on the record.

We have carefully examined the record and find that it does not contain a copy of the formal judgment and sentence. Under such conditions the Court of Criminal Appeals is without jurisdiction to consider the record as an appeal by transcript or by casemade. Bradford v. State, 3 Okl.Cr. 367, 106 P. 535; Allen v. State, 6 Okl.Cr. 665, 118 P. 1102; Fowler v. State, 11 Okl.Cr. 157, 143 P. 658; Loyd v. State, 12 Okl.Cr. 82, 151 P. 1190.

This appeal is accordingly dismissed.

NIX, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Connections Holdings, Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Date:  May 13, 2011By:
/s/ Brian NeillBrian Neill,Chief Financial Officer