alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1466-E1467]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           IN RECOGNITION OF THE LIFE OF JAMES ``PAPPY'' DUNN

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. MIKE ROGERS

                               of alabama

                    in the house of representatives

                       Monday, September 10, 2012

  Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Speaker, I respectfully ask for the 
House's attention today to honor Mr. James ``Pappy'' Dunn.
  James ``Pappy'' Dunn was born in Georgia, and was married to the 
former Barbara Lawson, of Talladega, Alabama. Together they had five 
children (Jimmy, Claudette, Bertis and Anrae) and one grandchild.
  In 1939, after earning a bachelor's degree from Alabama State 
University and a master's degree from Fisk University, Pappy began his 
career in education as a teacher and coach at Hobson City's Calhoun 
County Training School. During this time he served in World War II and 
oversaw the school's integration. In 1973, he was elected as the 
Alabama Education Association's second black president. Students 
remember him as someone who defined servant leadership. In 1986, Mr. 
Dunn retired as the school's principal.
  After his retirement from education, Pappy was elected to the Calhoun 
County Commission. It was here that he was named ``The Anniston 
Star's'' Citizen of the Year in 1997. In 2005 he received the SCLC 
Calhoun County Chapter Humanitarian Award, and in 2008 he received the 
Association of County Commissions of Alabama Award for Outstanding 
Contribution to County Government.
  Mr. Dunn was involved in numerous other organizations. These include 
the National Association of Counties' Health Steering Committee, the 
Anniston-Calhoun County Fort McClellan Joint Powers Authority, the East 
Alabama Regional Planning Commission, the Epsilon Delta Lambda Chapter 
of Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc., the Community Action Agency, the 
Salvation Army, and the American Red Cross.
  Mr. Speaker, I honor Mr. Dunn today and thank him for his dedication 
to Alabama's Third District.

[[Page E1467]]

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6053]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  TRIBUTE TO KENNETH AND VANESE CEDAR

 Mr. ROCKEFELLER. Mr. President, every year I have the honor, 
as a member of the Congressional Coalition on Adoption Institute, to 
recognize a West Virginia family for its efforts to promote adoption 
and provide homes for our Nation's vulnerable children. It is a 
wonderful program that highlights the change one couple can make in the 
life of a child.
  Throughout my career, I have been a strong advocate of legislation 
that supports adoption and other permanency efforts. I am inspired by 
the men and women who devote their lives to caring for these children. 
Today, I would like to recognize one such West Virginian family: 
Kenneth and Vanese Cedar, who are truly angels in adoption.
  Kenneth and Vanese have cared for 57 children over the years, 
including two biological sons of their own. Currently, they have 
adopted three children and serve as guardians for two teenagers. They 
also care for a foster child. They have raised their children in a 
close and devoted family, taking them to church, teaching them 
gardening and cooking, and playing sports together.
  Even when challenges have arisen, Kenneth and Vanese have remained 
dedicated to helping their own family and other children in need. In 
2009, Kenneth lost his job. Yet the couple took the obstacle as an 
opportunity to go back to school and earn regents bachelor of arts 
degrees, which they hope to use in social work and child protective 
services. When one of their sons nearly passed away from acute 
respiratory disease syndrome, they stood together as a family until he 
recovered, and he recently welcomed a child of his own.
  Kenneth and Vanese Cedar are a selfless and giving couple who deserve 
our respect and admiration. They have provided so many children with 
not simply a home but a family. I would like to thank these angels in 
adoption for the love and care they have provided to so many. They are 
truly an inspiration.

                          ____________________
```
16303	Waterman	Drive

Van	Nuys,	California	91406

Tel:					+1	818.902.0229	

Fax:			+1	818.902.9278	

www.helinet.com

May 12, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re. Petition to Amend FAA Exemption No. 11160 (the “Exemption”)

Dear Sir or Madam:

Helinet Aviation Services, LLC, hereby requests approval to amend the Exemption to include the operation 

of unmanned aircraft systems (“UAS”) for electronic news gathering (“ENG”). 

On February 2, 2015, the FAA issued the Exemption to Helinet to utilize UAS for motion picture and 

television filming. 

On April 22, 2015, the FAA granted Exemption No. 11408 to ArrowData, LLC for ENG use. The terms and 

conditions of the ArrowData exemption are identical to Helinet’s with the exception of: (i) the requirement to 

obtain a Plan of Activities prior to commencement of filming, and (ii) the industry/purpose for UAS usage. 

Because the FAA has already approved Helinet to operate UAS essentially under same terms as 

ArrowData, amending the Exemption to include ENG does not expand the approval already received by 

Helinet. As such, other than these two changes, Helinet is merely seeking to operate UAS under the same 

terms and conditions contained in the Exemption.

Perhaps more importantly, Helinet has performed ENG services with manned aircraft for 25 years. For this 

reason, Helinet fully understands the requirements to operate aircraft in a safe manner in a news gathering 

environment (attached herewith is a page from Helinet’s website regarding its ENG operations).

All UAS operations will continue to fully adhere to the conditions of the Exemption and all operations will be 

in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption.

Thank you for your consideration of our request.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at 818.902.0229.

Sincerely yours,

Jack Snyder

Vice President and General Counsel

Helinet Aviation Services, LLC
# C_2010063EN.01001301.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 January 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg — Germany) — Ümit Bekleyen v Land Berlin

(Case C-462/08) (1)

1

(EEC-Turkey Association Agreement - Second paragraph of Article 7 of Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council - Right of the child of a Turkish worker to respond to any offer of employment in the host Member State in which that child has completed a vocational training course - Start of the vocational training course after the parents have permanently left that Member State)

2010/C 63/19

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ümit Bekleyen

Applicant:

Defendant: Land Berlin

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg — Interpretation of the second paragraph of Article 7 of Decision No 1/80 of the EEC-Turkey Association Council — Turkish national born in the host Member State who, having returned with her parents to her country of origin, returns on her own, more than ten years later, to the host Member State in which her parents used to be regularly employed for more than three years, in order to start a vocational training course — Right of access to the labour market and corresponding right of residence in the host Member State for that Turkish national following the completion of a vocational training course

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The second paragraph of Article 7 of Decision No 1/80 of 19 September 1980 on the Development of the Association, adopted by the Association Council set up by the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey, must be interpreted as meaning that, in the case where a Turkish worker has previously been legally employed in the host Member State for more than three years, the child of such a worker may rely in that Member State, after completing her vocational training course there, on the right of access to the employment market and the corresponding right of residence, even though, after travelling back with her parents to their State of origin, she returned on her own to that Member State in order to start that training course there.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 24.01.2009.

1

---
Exhibit 32





SUNRIDGE INTERNATIONAL, INC.


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sunridge International, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated May 23, 2011








/s/ G. Richard Smith


G. Richard Smith


President and Chief Executive Officer











/s/ Charles B. Mathews


Charles B. Mathews


Chief Financial Officer
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**105 KA 10-02430**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAVID L. GARDINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PHILIP ROTHSCHILD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DAVID L. GARDINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (STEFANIE GRUBER, VICTORIA M. WHITE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), entered November 16, 2010. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq .). We reject defendant’s contention that County Court erred in assessing 30 points against him under risk factor 3, for having three or more victims. Defendant wascharged with sexually abusing three children, including his 11-yearold daughter. Although defendant pleaded guilty only to those counts of the indictment relating to the abuse of his daughter, it is well settled that, in determining the number of victims for SORA purposes, the hearing court is not limited to the crime of which defendant was convicted ( see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 5 [2006]; § 168-n [3]; People v Callan , 62 AD3d 1218, 1218-1219). Here, in making its determination, the court was entitled to consider “reliable hearsay evidence,” including the case summary, which supported the court’s determination as to the number of victims (§ 168-n [3]; see People v Mingo , 12 NY3d 563, 572-573; People v Baker , 57 AD3d 1472, lv denied 12 NY3d 706).

Defendant’s contention that the court should have granted a downward departure to a level two risk is not preserved for our review because defendant did not request a downward departure ( see People v Ratcliff , 53 AD3d 1110, lv denied 11 NY3d 708). Finally, contrary to**-2- 105 KA 10-02430** 
the contention raised by defendant in his pro se supplemental brief, the court properly assessed 25 points against him under risk factor 2, for having deviate sexual intercourse with at least one of the victims. Although defendant was not convicted of having deviate sexual intercourse with his daughter, the case summary states that he had deviate sexual intercourse with the other two victims, and the indictment charges him with having deviate sexual intercourse with one of them. Moreover, the indictment was presumably based upon the victims’ grand jury testimony, which also constitutes reliable hearsay ( see People v Howard , 52 AD3d 273, lv denied 11 NY3d 706).

Entered: February 10, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Pro-Built 

Under Contract No. W5J9JE-10-D-0028 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

A SB CA No. 593 70 

William J. Spriggs, Esq. 

Spriggs Consulting Services 

Lynchburg, VA 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Pietro 0. Mistretta, Esq. 

Matthew S. Tilghman, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorneys 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Middle East 

Winchester, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute which is the subject of this appeal having been settled, the appeal is 

dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 4 April 20 I 7 

L 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in A SB CA No. 593 70, Appeal of Pro-Built, 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
# C_2009032EN.01003801.xml

| 7.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/38

---

Action brought on 11 November 2008 — Atlas Transport v OHIM — Hartmann (ATLAS TRANSPORT)

(Case T-482/08)

(2009/C 32/74)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Atlas Transport GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: U. Hildebrandt, K. Schmidt-Hern and B. Weichhaus, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Alfred Hartmann (Leer, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 September 2008 (Case R 1858/2007-4); and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 September 2008 (Case R 1858/2007-4); and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Word mark ‘Atlas Transport’ for transport operations (transport of goods) in Class 39 (Community trade mark No 545 681).

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant.

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: A. Hartmann.

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Dismissal of the application.

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Granting of the application for a declaration that the registration has lapsed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Breach of Article 15 and Rules 22 and 40 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (1), in so far as an incorrect standard was applied to the proof of use preserving the rights held and as evidence submitted was incorrectly assessed; breach of the procedural requirements of the right to a hearing in accordance with [Rule] 73(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 and of the duty to give reasons under [Rule] 73(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95; incorrect assessment.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1995 L 303, p. 1).

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4403 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4403

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 18, 2018

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to protect personally identifiable 
                  information, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Moving Americans Privacy Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 431(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1431(c)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(2)(A) The information listed in paragraph (1) shall not be 
available for public disclosure if--
            ``(i) the Secretary of the Treasury makes an affirmative 
        finding on a shipment-by-shipment basis that disclosure is 
        likely to pose a threat of personal injury or property damage; 
        or
            ``(ii) the information is exempt under the provisions of 
        section 552(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code.
    ``(B) The Secretary shall ensure that any personally identifiable 
information, including Social Security account numbers and passport 
numbers, is removed from any manifest signed, produced, delivered, or 
electronically transmitted under this section before access to the 
manifest is provided to the public.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 30 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 17, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
================================================================================


                                  Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tari Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.       The Report fully complies with  the  requirements  of  Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,   in  all
         material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.



Date:  November 14, 2005

                                               /s/ Theodore Tsagkaris

                                               --------------------------------
                                               Theodore Tsagkaris
                                               President, C.E.O. and Director
                                               (Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2008064EN.01006202.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/62

---

Action brought on 11 January 2008 — Katjes Fassin v OHIM (Yoghurt-Gums)

(Case T-25/08)

(2008/C 64/101)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG (Emmerich, Germany) (represented by R. Uecker, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 25 October 2007 (Case R 1322/2006-4); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 25 October 2007 (Case R 1322/2006-4);

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the action, including those incurred during the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the action, including those incurred during the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘Yoghurt-Gums’ for goods in Classes 29, 30 and 32 (Application No 4 929 808).

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Partial refusal to register.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) in relation to the goods in Class 30 which are still at issue in the proceedings.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---