alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James H. Perkins, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The prosecutor’s cross-examination of defendant’s alibi witness was proper. The prosecutor was testing the basis for the witness’s ability to recall details concerning the night in question and did not imply that the witness had an obligation to report her exculpatory information to the authorities *(c.f, People v Dawson,*50 NY2d 311). By failing to object to the prosecutor’s summation, defendant has failed to preserve for review any argument concerning the propriety thereof.

*616Grand larceny in the fourth degree, which requires the taking from the person of the victim, is not a concurrent, inclusory count of robbery in the third degree, which does not contain that element *(see, People v Glover,*57 NY2d 61, 63; *People v Harris,*92 AD2d 738). Defendant’s reliance upon pre *Glover*cases is misplaced *(see, People v Jordan,*148 AD2d 921).

We find that the evidence that defendant leaned into the victim’s car, thrust his arm across her chest and pushed down on her right shoulder, forcing her halfway down onto the passenger seat as he removed her purse from her left shoulder, is sufficient to support the conviction for robbery in the third degree *(see, People v Crandall,*135 AD2d 1084; *cf, People v Davis,*71 AD2d 607). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Gorman, J. — Robbery, 3rd Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 1 July 2009 – Perfetti Van Melle v OHIM – Cloetta Fazer (CENTER
SHOCK)**

**(Case T-16/08)**

Community trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Community word mark CENTER SHOCK – Earlier national word marks CENTER – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation
(EC) No 207/2009)

Community trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds of invalidity (Council Regulation No 40/94, Arts 8(1)(b) and 52(1)(a)) (see paras 41-44, 49-50)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 November 2007 (Case R 149/2006-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between Cloetta Fazer AB and Perfetti Van Melle SpA. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: | The word mark ‘CENTER SHOCK’ for goods in Class 30 – Community trade mark No 973065 |
| Proprietor of the Community trade mark: | Perfetti Van Melle SpA |
| Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: | Cloetta Fazer AB |
| Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: | The national word marks ‘CENTER’ and ‘CLOETTA CENTER’ for goods in, inter alia, Class 30 |
| Decision of the Cancellation Division: | Declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

1.      Dismisses the action;

2.      Orders Perfetti Van Melle SpA to pay the costs.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                        ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

To the Board of Directors of Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp.:

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Philadelphia Consolidated
Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries appearing in this Form 10-K also included an
audit of the financial statement schedules listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form
10-K. In our opinion, these financial statement schedules present fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction
with the related consolidated financial statements.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2002 the
Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill to conform with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets."

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, PA
February 7, 2003


                                     107
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
        
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                          602,242
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   4,594,408
<ALLOWANCES>                    500,000
<INVENTORY>                     582,512
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                11,833,213
<PP&E>                          7,699,140
<DEPRECIATION>                  4,422,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  27,150,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           8,812,632
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     2,700,000
<COMMON>                        14,513
<OTHER-SE>                      15,364,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    27,150,705
<SALES>                         17,921,899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                17,921,899
<CGS>                           17,649,365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   17,649,365
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                11,261,092
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              512,768
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (11,501,326)
<INCOME-TAX>                    (1,561,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (9,940,326)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (9,940,326)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (0.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.89)
        



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report included in Item 5 of this Form 10-Q, into the Company's
previously filed Form S-8 Registration Statements File Nos. 333-14363,
333-19141, 333-24329, 333-35701, 333-09090, 333-09092 and 333-81783. Our
report dated January 27, 1999 included in Dendrite's Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1998 is no longer appropriate since restated financial
statements have been presented giving effect to a business combination
accounted for as a pooling of interests.

                                                     ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Philiadelphia, PA
August 16, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF CAYENNE SOFTWARE, 
INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORMS 10-K, 10-KA 
AND 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000880229
<NAME> CAYENNE SOFTWARE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,666
<ALLOWANCES>                                       796
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,722
<PP&E>                                          16,978
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,722
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,362
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        150
<COMMON>                                           178
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,137
<SALES>                                          5,071
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,397
<CGS>                                              578
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,225
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    213
<INCOME-TAX>                                       113
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
June 19, 2002

22788

#### State v. Kosi

Affirmed
Exhibit 13.1

906 CERTIFICATION

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Wang Zhiqing, the President of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) , as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: April 27, 2017



By:

/s/ Wang ZhiqingName:

Wang ZhiqingTitle:

President
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 120 (Monday, September 10, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6023]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 prayer

  The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, offered the following prayer:
  Let us pray.
  Eternal God, Your presence fills us with reverential awe for we find 
a light in Your commands. Even in darkness, your light dawns for those 
who love You. And so, Lord, as we begin the next phase of the work of 
the Senate, give us greater confidence in the power of Your 
providential purposes. Remind our lawmakers that the hearts of 
governmental leaders are in Your hands, yielding to the wisdom of Your 
sovereign will. Help us, Lord, to get to know You and love You so we 
can serve You as we should.
  We pray in Your mighty Name. Amen.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 13.2

906 CERTIFICATION

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ye Guohua, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best
of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) , as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: April 30, 2013



By:

/s/ Ye GuohuaName:

Ye GuohuaTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement for Wholesale Financing



 EXHIBIT 10:22 
  
 Confidential portions of this document indicated by ***** have been omitted and filed separately with the Commission

  
 AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT FOR WHOLESALE

 FINANCING 
 (Amendment No. 3)

  
 This Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement for Wholesale Financing
(“Amendment”) is made by and between Deutsche Financial Services Corporation (“DFS”) and Featherlite Mfg., Inc. (“Dealer”). 
  
 WHEREAS, DFS and Dealer entered into that certain Amended and Restated
Agreement for Wholesale Financing dated October 6, 1997, as amended by that certain Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement for Wholesale Financing (Amendment No. 1) dated April 1, 1998, and that certain Amendment to Amended and Restated
Agreement for Wholesale Financing (Amendment No. 2) dated May 8, 1998 (together, the “)Agreement”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, DFS and Dealer desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, DFS and Dealer agree as follows: 
  
 1. Amendment of Current Ratio. Paragraph 13.1 (c) of the Agreement is deleted and amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
  
 “(C) A RATIO OF Current Tangible Assets to current liabilities of not less than ONE AND ONE-HALF to ONE (1.5:1).”

  
 2. No Other Modifications. Except as expressly modified
or amended herein, all other terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect and the Agreement, as hereby amended, is ratified and confirmed by DFS and Dealer. 
  
 3. Capitalized Terms. Except as otherwise defined herein, all
capitalized terms will have the same meanings set forth in the Agreement. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, DFS and Dealer have executed this Amendment as of the 25th day
of March, 2000. 
  
 DEUTSCHE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION 
  

			
	By:	 	 \s\ Leonard F. Buchan


	 	 	Leonard F. Buchan
	 	 	Vice President
	
	FEATHERLITE MFG., INC.
		
	By:	 	 \s\ C. Clement


	 	 	 Conrad D. Clement
 President
# C_2013377EN.01001101.xml

| 21.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 377/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 377/11

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2013 — Deutsche Post v Commission

(Case T-570/08 RENV) (1)

1

(State aid - Postal service - Decision requiring the production of information - Appropriate nature of the time-limit - Obligation to state reasons - Relevance of the information requested)

2013/C 377/24

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Post (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: J Sedemund, T. Lübbig and M. Klasse, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Martenczuk and T. Maxian Rusche, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 30 October 2008, requiring information to be provided in the proceedings relating to State aid to Deutsche Post AG [C 36/2007 (ex NN 25/2007)].

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Deutsche Post AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Deutsche Post AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---
# C_2011355EN.01001502.xml

| 3.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2011 — Uralita v Commission

(Case T-349/08) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Sodium chlorate market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Action for annulment - Imputability of unlawful conduct)

2011/C 355/24

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Uralita SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: I.S. Forrester QC, and K. Struckmann, P. Lindfelt and J. Garcia-Nieto Esteva, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras, R. Sauer, A. Biolan and J. Bourke, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 2626 final of 11 June 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.695 — Sodium chlorate) in so far as it concerns Uralita, SA

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Uralita, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Uralita, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 8.11.2008.

1

---
#### Ex parte BATEMAN.

No. A-11863.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

March 25, 1953.

Bill Bateman, petitioner, pro se.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., and Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

JONES, Judge.

This is an original action in habeas corpus, instituted by the petitioner, Bill Bate-man, for the purpose of securing his release from confinement in the penitentiary at McAlester. The Attorney General has filed a demurrer to the petition.

The petition alleges in general terms that petitioner entered his plea of guilty in the District Court of Texas County on December 6, 1951, to the crime of larceny of an automobile, and was sentenced to serve 10 years in the penitentiary. Pursuant to such sentence, he is now incarcerated in the penitentiary. The petition further alleges that the petitioner was not guilty of larceny of an automobile but, if guilty of anything, was guilty of embezzlement or larceny by fraud, depending upon his intent at the time the alleged crime was committed. The petition is unverified. Although there is a general statement that petitioner was coerced into pleading guilty, no facts are alleged in connection with said allegation by stating the nature of the coercion and the names of the party or parties who allegedly coerced him into entering his plea.

The petitioner’s guilt or innocence of a crime for which he is under sentence will not be considered on habeas corpus. Ex parte Lee, 87 Okl.Cr. 427, 198 P.2d 1005. Our authority is limited in habeas *538corpus cases to an inquiry into jurisdictional matters. Neither a copy of the information nor a copy of the judgment and sentence is attached to the petition and the petition is so indefinite and uncertain that the court is unable to determine exactly the grounds of complaint. It is sufficient to say that no allegations are made in the petition, which, if true, would defeat the jurisdiction of the District 'Court to pronounce judgment on the plea of guilty.

The petition is denied.

POWELL, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Castelle (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Cheng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Paul Cheng |  
Name:

Paul Cheng

 
Title:

Chief Financial Officer

 

Date:

March 27, 2006

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Castelle and will be retained by Castelle and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

E-30

 

 

  |
|--------|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|