alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vyteris Holdings (Nevada), Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael McGuinness, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
                Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of
                operations of the Company for the periods presented.


        August 19, 2005                         /s/ Michael McGuinness
                                                ----------------------
                                                    Michael McGuinness
                                                    Chief Financial Officer




This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ZBB Energy Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Eric C. Apfelbach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
to my knowledge, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ZBB Energy Corporation and will be retained by ZBB Energy
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





November
      15, 2010
              /s/  Eric C.
      ApfelbachEric
      C. Apfelbach(Principal
      Executive Officer)
# C_2008301EN.01005101.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/51

---

Action brought on 18 September 2008 — Clearwire Corporation v OHIM (CLEARWIFI)

(Case T-399/08)

(2008/C 301/86)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Clearwire Corporation (Kirkland, United States) (represented by G. Konrad, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 June 2008 in case R 706/2008-1; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 June 2008 in case R 706/2008-1; and

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark CLEARWIFI for services in class 38 — international registration No W00 934 594

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Rejection of the application

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the grounds for refusal put forward by the Board of Appeal do not preclude registration.

Pleas in law:

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT AND

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



I, Maureen K. Usifer, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify that, based on
my knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 2, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Maureen K. Usifer  
|Name:  |  | Maureen K. Usifer      
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer



Dated: May 12, 2004
**Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 January 2009 – Sebirán v OHIM**

**(Case C‐210/08 P)**

Appeal – Community trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 8(1)(b) – Likelihood of confusion – Figurative mark Coto D’Arcis – Opposition by the proprietor of word marks COTO DE IMAZ and EL COTO – Partial refusal to register

Appeals – Grounds – Mistaken assessment of the facts – Inadmissibility – Review by the Court of Justice of the assessment of the facts put before the Court of First Instance – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 225(1) EC; Statute of the Court of Justice,
Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 31)

**Re:**

| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 12 March 2008 in Case T‐332/04 | Sebirán | v | OHIM | and El Coto de Rioja | , by which that Court dismissed the action brought by Sebirán for the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 June 2004 (Case R 550/2003-2). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the appeal; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Sebirán SL to pay the costs. |
# C_2018373EN.01001801.xml

| 15.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 373/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 373/18

---

Action brought on 24 August 2018 — OLX v EUIPO — Stra (STRADIA)

(Case T-508/18)

(2018/C 373/20)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: OLX BV (Hoofddorp, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Lodge, K. Gilbert, Solicitors and V. Jones, Barrister)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Stra Lda (Coimbra, Portugal)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark STRADIA — Application for registration No 14 841 985

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2018 in joined Cases R 2228/2017-4 and R 2229/2017-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | in the alternative, alter the contested decision to state that the Opposition should be remitted to the Opposition Division for it to reconsider the Opposition; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, alter the contested decision to state that the Opposition should be remitted to the Opposition Division for it to reconsider the Opposition;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the Applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this Application and the costs before the Board. In the alternative, if the other party before the Board intervenes, then EUIPO and the intervener jointly and severally pay the Applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this Application and the costs before the Board. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the Applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this Application and the costs before the Board. In the alternative, if the other party before the Board intervenes, then EUIPO and the intervener jointly and severally pay the Applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this Application and the costs before the Board.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of the Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of the Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4564 

AN ACT 

To require a threat assessment on current foreign terrorist 

fighter activities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4564 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Post-Caliphate Threat 

3 Assessment Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. THREAT ASSESSMENT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Homeland Secu6 rity, in coordination with the Secretary of State and Direc7 tor of National Intelligence, shall conduct a threat assess8 ment of current foreign terrorist fighter activities. Such 

9 assessment shall include the following: 

10 (1) A detailed summary of current foreign ter11 rorist fighter travel and trends, including countries 

12 of origin, travel destinations, and means of travel. 

13 (2) An analysis of any country or region with 

14 a significant increase in foreign terrorist fighter ac15 tivity. 

16 (3) An analysis of foreign terrorist fighter trav17 el trends in and out of Iraq and Syria. 

18 (b) CONGRESSIONAL COMMUNICATION.—Not later 

19 than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

20 the Secretary of Homeland Security shall report to the 

21 Committee on Homeland Security, the Committee on For22 eign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on In23 telligence of the House of Representatives and the Com24 mittee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, 

25 the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Com-
3 

•HR 4564 EH

1 mittee on Intelligence of the Senate on the threat assess2 ment required under subsection (a). 

Passed the House of Representatives January 9, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4564 

AN ACT 

terrorist fighter activities, and for other purposes. 

To require a threat assessment on current foreign
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, C. James Bess, President and Chief Executive Officer, and A. Lee Miller, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ C. JAMES BESS

/s/ A. LEE MILLER



C. James Bess

A. Lee Miller

President and Chief Executive Officer

Senior Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer





August 14, 2002
# C_2009019EN.01003501.xml

| 24.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/35

---

Action brought on 24 November 2008 — Bang & Olufsen v OHIM (Representation of a loudspeaker)

(Case T-508/08)

(2009/C 19/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant(s): Bang & Olufsen A/S (Struer, Denmark) (represented by K. Wallberg, lawyer)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul paragraph 2 the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 September 2008 in case R 497/2005-1; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul paragraph 2 the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 September 2008 in case R 497/2005-1; and

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The three-dimensional mark representing a loudspeaker for goods in classes 9 and 20 — application No 3 354 371

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Rejection of the application

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partial annulment of the decision of the examiner

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 63(6) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal failed to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice; Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(iii) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal wrongly took the view that the Community trade mark concerned is a sign which consists exclusively of a shape which gives substantial value to the goods.

Pleas in law:

---
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 20 October 2009 – Aldi Einkauf v OHIM – Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones
(4 OUT Living)**

**(Case T-307/08)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for figurative Community mark 4 OUT Living – Earlier national figurative mark Living & Co – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1))(b)) (see paras 19-21, 32-33)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 May 2008 (Case R 1199/2007‐1) relating to opposition proceedings between Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones, SL and Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG |
| Community trade mark sought: | Figurative mark 4 OUT Living for goods and services in Classes 18, 25 and 28 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones, SL |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | Spanish trade mark registration of the figurative mark Living & Co (No 2604969) for goods and services in Classes 3, 14, 16, 18, 21, 25, 34 and 35 |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition partially upheld |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG to pay the costs. |
1 ... S eeTe x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 40 8- CV J OHN W AY NE J E NK I NS AP P E L L ANT V . KI M LE E JE N KI N S A PPELL EE

----- ----- FR O M THE 2 31ST DI STRI CT CO URT O F TARRA NT CO UN TY

----- ----- 

### ME MORANDUM OPI NI ON 1 

### AND J UDGME NT

----- ----- O n M ay 8, 20 09 , w e not i f i ed appel l a n tt hathi s br i efhad not been f i l ed as r equ i r ed by Te xas Rul e o fA pp el l at e Pr oce dur e 38. 6( a) . Tex . R. A pp. P. 38 . 6( a) . W e st at ed w e coul d di sm i ss t he appeal f or w ant of pr osecut i on un l ess a p p e lla n to ra n yp a r t y d e s ir in g t o c o n t in u e t h is a p p e a l f ile d w it h t h e c o u r tw it h in t en days a m ot i on r easonabl y expl ai ni ng t he f ai l ur e t o f i l e a br i efand t he need fo r a n e x te n s i o n . S eeT ex. R . A pp. P. 10. 5( b) , 38. 8( a) ( 1) , 42. 3. W e h ave not r ecei ved any r esponse.2

Beca us e a ppe l l ant ’ s br i efha s no t been f i l ed, w e d i sm i ss t he app ea l f or w a n t o f p ro s e c u ti o n . S eeT e x . R . A p p . P . 3 8 .8 (a ), 4 2 .3 (b ), 4 3 .2 (f). P E R CU R I AM P A N E L : M C C O Y , J .; C A Y C E , C .J .; a n d M E IE R , J . DEL I VERE D: J un e 4, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 809 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 809

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          July 7, 2016.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (S. 524) to authorize the 
Attorney General to award grants to address the national epidemics of 
prescription opioid abuse and heroin use. All points of order against the 
conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference 
report shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the conference report to its adoption without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate; and (2) one motion to recommit if applicable.
    Sec. 2.  Upon adoption of this resolution--
     (a) the House shall be considered to have: (1) taken from the Speaker's 
table the bill (S. 2943) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2017 for 
military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and 
for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military 
personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; (2) stricken 
all after the enacting clause of such bill and inserted in lieu thereof the 
provisions of H.R. 4909, as passed by the House; and (3) passed the Senate bill 
as so amended; and
    (b) it shall be in order for the chair of the Committee on Armed Services or 
his designee to move that the House insist on its amendment to S. 2943 and 
request a conference with the Senate thereon.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hanover Compressor Company
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Chad C.
Deaton, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/S/ CHAD C. DEATON
------------------------------
Name: Chad C. Deaton

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 26, 2004

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
# C_2008247EN.01001902.xml

| 27.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/19

---

Action brought on 28 July 2008 — Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-296/08)

(2008/C 247/38)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: U. Claus, lawyer, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Commission Decision of 23 May 2008 definitively granting a payment under the ‘Integration indicators and generation change’ programme on the basis of the financing arrangement JLS/2004/INTI/077, insofar as applicant's application for a final payment of EUR 59 592,77, exceeding the authorised amount, was rejected; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission Decision of 23 May 2008 definitively granting a payment under the ‘Integration indicators and generation change’ programme on the basis of the financing arrangement JLS/2004/INTI/077, insofar as applicant's application for a final payment of EUR 59 592,77, exceeding the authorised amount, was rejected;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant and the Commission signed a contract in May 2005 concerning the promotion of a project in the context of the INTI programme. By letter dated 23 May 2008, the defendant granted the applicant a lower final payment than that for which the latter had applied. The present action is directed against the rejection of its application for payment of the costs exceeding the authorised sum.

The applicant asserts in support of its action that the Commission's view that a change of project participants after the conclusion of the financing arrangement is only possible if an appropriate alteration agreement is concluded is unfounded. This is due to the fact that a provision to that effect is not included in the financing arrangement. Further, the Commission refused to recognise costs on various grounds, which are incompatible with the financing arrangement and with previous institutional practice.

---