Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules 37243 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA– 

2011–0475; Directorate Identifier 2010– 

NM–199–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by August 15, 

2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to The Boeing Company 

Model 757–200, –200PF, –200CB, and –300 

series airplanes, certificated in any category, 

as identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 757– 

27A0152, Revision 3, dated October 28, 2013. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 27, Flight Controls. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by numerous 

reports of unintended lateral oscillations 

during the final approach, just before 

landing. We are issuing this AD to reduce the 

chance of unintended lateral oscillations near 

touchdown, which could result in loss of 

lateral control of the airplane, and 

consequent airplane damage or injury to 

flight crew and passengers. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Installation and Inspection 

Within 60 months after the effective date 

of this AD, do the applicable actions 

specified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and 

(g)(3) of this AD. 

(1) For Configuration 1 airplanes as defined 

in Boeing Service Bulletin 757–27A0152, 

Revision 3, dated October 28, 2013: Install 

three bracket assemblies and three new 

relays, and make changes to the wire 

bundles, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 

Service Bulletin 757–27A0152, Revision 3, 

dated October 28, 2013. 

(2) For Configuration 2 airplanes as defined 

in Boeing Service Bulletin 757–27A0152, 

Revision 3, dated October 28, 2013: Torque 

the bracket assembly nuts and ground stud 

nuts, do bond resistance tests to verify that 

bonding requirements are met, do a general 

visual inspection to ensure that the three new 

relays do not touch the adjacent wire 

bundles, and do all applicable related 

investigative and corrective actions, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 757– 

27A0152, Revision 3, dated October 28, 2013. 

Do all applicable related investigative and 

corrective actions before further flight. 

(3) For Configuration 3 airplanes as defined 

in Boeing Service Bulletin 757–27A0152, 

Revision 3, dated October 28, 2013: Do a 

general visual inspection to ensure that the 

three new relays do not touch the adjacent 

wire bundles, and do all applicable related 

investigative and corrective actions, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 757– 

27A0152, Revision 3, dated October 28, 2013. 

Do all applicable related investigative and 

corrective actions before further flight. 

(h) Credit for Previous Actions 

This paragraph provides credit for actions 

required by paragraph (g) of this AD, if those 

actions were performed before the effective 

date of this AD using Boeing Service Bulletin 

757–27A0152, Revision 2, dated May 25, 

2012. 

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (j)(2) of this AD. Information may 

be emailed to: 9-ANM-LAACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD if it is approved by the 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles 

ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 

method to be approved, the repair must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(j) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Marie Hogestad, Aerospace Engineer, 

Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–130S, 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 

FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 

98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6418; fax: 425– 

917–6590; email: marie.hogestad@faa.gov. 

(2) For information about AMOCs for this 

AD, contact Jen Pei, Aerospace Engineer, 

Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–130L, 

Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office 

(ACO), FAA, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, 

Lakewood, CA 90712–4137; phone: 562–627– 

5320; fax: 562–627–5210; email: jen.pei@

faa.gov. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– 

544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; 

Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You 

may view this service information at the 

FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 24, 

2014. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–15416 Filed 6–30–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0348; Directorate 

Identifier 2014–NM–033–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

The Boeing Company Model 777–200, 

777–200LR, 777–300ER, and 777F series 

airplanes. This proposed AD was 

prompted by a report indicating that 

sealant may not have been applied in 

production to the wing skin panel gaps 

above certain underwing fittings. This 

proposed AD would require an 

inspection for missing sealant, and 

applicable other specified, related 

investigative, and corrective actions. We 

are proposing this AD to detect and 

correct missing sealant from the wing 

skin panel gaps above the underwing 

fittings, which could result in corrosion 

and fatigue cracking in the wing skin 

panel, and consequent loss of limit load 

capability of the wing skin and potential 

subsequent structural failure of the 

wings. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by August 15, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
37244 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data 

& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, 

MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; 

telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; 

fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view 

this referenced service information at 

the FAA, at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, WA. For information on 

the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0348; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Office 

(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Haytham Alaidy, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office 

(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–6573; phone: 425– 

917–6422; fax: 425–917–6590; email: 

haytham.alaidy@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposal. Send your comments to 

an address listed under the ADDRESSES

section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA– 

2014–0348; Directorate Identifier 2014– 

NM–033–AD’’ at the beginning of your 

comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD because of those 

comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

We received a report that sealant may 

not have been applied in production to 

the wing skin panel gaps above certain 

underwing fittings, as required by type 

design before their installation. Affected 

in-production airplanes have been 

inspected for proper sealant application, 

and Boeing has addressed production 

installation procedures for this sealant. 

Missing sealant from the wing skin 

panel gaps above the underwing fittings 

could result in corrosion and fatigue 

cracking in the wing skin panel, and 

consequent loss of limit load capability 

of the wing skin and potential 

subsequent structural failure of the 

wings. 

Relevant Service Information 

We reviewed Boeing Alert Service 

Bulletin 777–57A0097, dated January 

10, 2014. For information on the 

procedures and compliance times, see 

this service information at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

Docket No. FAA–2014–0348. 

FAA’s Determination 

We are proposing this AD because we 

evaluated all the relevant information 

and determined the unsafe condition 

described previously is likely to exist or 

develop in other products of the same 

type design. 

Proposed AD Requirements 

This proposed AD would require 

accomplishing an inspection for missing 

sealant, and applicable other specified, 

related investigative, and corrective 

actions, specified in the service 

information described previously, 

except as discussed under ‘‘Difference 

Between this Proposed AD and the 

Service Information.’’ 

The phrase ‘‘related investigative 

actions’’ is used in this proposed AD. 

‘‘Related investigative actions’’ are 

follow-on actions that (1) are related to 

the primary actions, and (2) further 

investigate the nature of any condition 

found. Related investigative actions in 

an AD could include, for example, 

inspections. 

The phrase ‘‘corrective actions’’ is 

used in this proposed AD. ‘‘Corrective 

actions’’ are actions that correct or 

address any condition found. Corrective 

actions in an AD could include, for 

example, repairs. 

The phrase ‘‘other specified actions’’ 

is used in this proposed AD. Other 

specified actions in this proposed AD 

include restoring sealant. 

Explanation of ‘‘RC’’ Steps in Service 

Information 

The FAA worked in conjunction with 

industry, under the Airworthiness 

Directives Implementation Aviation 

Rulemaking Committee, to enhance the 

AD system. One enhancement was a 

new process for annotating which steps 

in the service information are required 

for compliance with an AD. 

Differentiating these steps from other 

tasks in the service information is 

expected to improve an owner’s/

operator’s understanding of crucial AD 

requirements and help provide 

consistent judgment in AD compliance. 

The actions specified in the service 

information described previously 

include steps that are labeled as RC 

(required for compliance) because these 

steps have a direct effect on detecting, 

preventing, resolving, or eliminating an 

identified unsafe condition. 

As noted in the specified service 

information, steps labeled as RC must be 

done to comply with the proposed AD. 

However, steps that are not labeled as 

RC are recommended. Those steps that 

are not labeled as RC may be deviated 

from, done as part of other actions, or 

done using accepted methods different 

from those identified in the service 

information without obtaining approval 

of an AMOC, provided the steps labeled 

as RC can be done and the airplane can 

be put back in a serviceable condition. 

Any substitutions or changes to steps 

labeled as RC will require approval of 

an alternative method of compliance. 

Difference Between This Proposed AD 

and the Service Information 

Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777– 

57A0097, dated January 10, 2014, 

specifies to contact the manufacturer for 

instructions on how to repair certain 

conditions, but this proposed AD would 

require repairing those conditions in 

one of the following ways: 

• In accordance with a method that 

we approve; or 

• Using data that meet the 

certification basis of the airplane, and 

that have been approved by the Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) whom 

we have authorized to make those 

findings. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

affects 6 airplanes of U.S. registry. We 

estimate the following costs to comply 

with this proposed AD: 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules 37245 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. 

operators 

Inspection ............................. Up to 104 work-hours × $85 per hour = $8,840 ................ $0 Up to $8,840 .... Up to $53,040. 

We estimate the following costs to do 

any necessary actions that would be 

required based on the results of the 

proposed inspection. We have no way of 

determining the number of aircraft that 

might need these actions: 

ON-CONDITION COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product 

Sealant restoration ...................................................... 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ............................. $0 $85. 

Corrosion inspection .................................................... 2 work-hours × $85 per hour = $170 ......................... 0 $170 per side. 

We have received no definitive data 

that would enable us to provide cost 

estimates for the on-condition corrosion 

repair specified in this proposed AD. 

According to the manufacturer, some 

of the costs of this proposed AD may be 

covered under warranty, thereby 

reducing the cost impact on affected 

individuals. We do not control warranty 

coverage for affected individuals. As a 

result, we have included all costs in our 

cost estimate. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This proposed 

regulation is within the scope of that 

authority because it addresses an unsafe 

condition that is likely to exist or 

develop on products identified in this 

rulemaking action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

the DOT Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 

1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA– 

2014–0348; Directorate Identifier 2014– 

NM–033–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by August 15, 

2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to The Boeing Company 

Model 777–200, 777–200LR, 777–300ER, and 

777F series airplanes, certificated in any 

category, as identified in Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 777–57A0097, dated January 

10, 2014. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 57, Wings. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by a report 

indicating that sealant may not have been 

applied in production to the wing skin panel 

gaps above certain underwing fittings. We are 

issuing this AD to detect and correct missing 

sealant from the wing skin panel gaps above 

the underwing fittings, which could result in 

corrosion and fatigue cracking in the wing 

skin panel, and consequent loss of limit load 

capability of the wing skin and potential 

subsequent structural failure of the wings. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Inspection 

At the applicable time specified in 

paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing 

Alert Service Bulletin 777–57A0097, dated 

January 10, 2014, except as required by 

paragraph (h)(1) of this AD: Do a detailed 

inspection for missing sealant in the wing 

skin panel gaps above the underwing fittings, 

and do all applicable other specified, related 

investigative, and corrective actions, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

777–57A0097, dated January 10, 2014, except 

as required by paragraph (h)(2) of this AD. Do 

all applicable other specified, related 

investigative, and corrective actions before 

further flight. 

(h) Exceptions to Service Information 

Specifications 

(1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

777–57A0097, dated January 10, 2014, 

specifies a compliance time ‘‘after the 

original issue date of this service bulletin,’’ 

this AD requires compliance within the 

specified compliance time after the effective 

date of this AD. 

(2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

777–57A0097, dated January 10, 2014, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
37246 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 126 / Tuesday, July 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate 

action: Repair before further flight using a 

method approved in accordance with the 

procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this 

AD. 

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. Information may 

be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD if it is approved by the 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle 

ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 

method to be approved, the repair must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(4) If the service information contains steps 

that are labeled as RC (Required for 

Compliance), those steps must be done to 

comply with this AD; any steps that are not 

labeled as RC are recommended. Those steps 

that are not labeled as RC may be deviated 

from, done as part of other actions, or done 

using accepted methods different from those 

identified in the specified service 

information without obtaining approval of an 

AMOC, provided the steps labeled as RC can 

be done and the airplane can be put back in 

a serviceable condition. Any substitutions or 

changes to steps labeled as RC require 

approval of an AMOC. 

(j) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Haytham Alaidy, Aerospace 

Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, 

FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office 

(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; phone: 425–917– 

6422; fax: 425–917–6573; email: 

haytham.alaidy@faa.gov. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– 

544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; 

Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You 

may view this referenced service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 24, 

2014. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–15369 Filed 6–30–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0424; Directorate 

Identifier 2014–NM–003–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, 

Inc. Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

Bombardier, Inc. Model BD–700–1A10 

and BD–700–1A11 airplanes. This 

proposed AD was prompted by reports 

of an incorrectly assembled check tee 

fitting used in fire extinguishing 

(FIREEX) distribution lines. This 

proposed AD would require inspecting 

to determine the part number and for all 

affected check tee fittings measuring for 

correct depth, and replacing if 

necessary. We are proposing this AD to 

detect and correct faulty check tee 

fittings, which will reduce fire 

extinguishing protection. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by August 15, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact—Bombardier, 

Inc., 400 Coˆte-Vertu Road West, Dorval, 

Que ́bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 

514–855–5000; fax 514–855–7401; email 

thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet 

http://www.bombardier.com. You may 

view this referenced service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, 

call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0424; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Office 

(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe and Mechanical Systems 

Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York 

Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 

Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, 

New York 11590; telephone (516) 228– 

7318; fax (516) 794–5531. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0424; Directorate Identifier 

2014–NM–003–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD based on those comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

Transport Canada Civil Aviation, 

which is the aviation authority for 

Canada, has issued Canadian 

Airworthiness Directive CF–2013–41, 

dated December 30, 2013 (referred to 

after this as the Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the 

MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition 

for the specified products. The MCAI 

states: 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS