alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 4406 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 99 Macombs 

Place in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Tuskegee Airmen Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. TUSKEGEE AIRMEN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 99 Macombs Place in New York, New York, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Tuskegee Airmen Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Tuskegee Airmen Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Brad E. Herr, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Temporary Financial
Services, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days
prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: October 18, 2004

/s/ Brad E. Herr
---------------------------------------
Brad E. Herr, Chief Financial Officer
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4247 

To repeal title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 

Protection Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2017 

Mr. BUDD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To repeal title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform 

and Consumer Protection Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring Financial 

5 Market Freedom Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF TITLE VIII. 

7 (a) REPEAL.—Title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall 

8 Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 

9 5461 et seq.) is repealed, and provisions of law amended 


srobinson on DSKBC5CHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4247 IH

1 by such title are restored and revived as if such title had 

2 never been enacted. 

3 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

4 in section 1(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 

5 Consumer Protection Act is amended by striking the items 

6 relating to title VIII. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKBC5CHB2PROD with BILLS
#### John BLACKBURN, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff below). Orlando ANTELOPE, Jr., Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff below).

No. 2957.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Dec. 27, 1960.

For original opinion see 357 P.2d 174.

John J. Spriggs, Sr., Lander, for appellant.

Norman B. Gray, Atty. Gen., and W. M. Haight, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellees.

Order

This cause having been heretofore taken under advisement on the petition of appellants for a rehearing, and the court being now fully advised in the premises, it is ordered that said petition for rehearing be, and the same is hereby, denied.
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 





January 18, 2017


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 290


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
Securities as of close of business on January 17, 2017, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Standard Terms
and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing
the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-214668) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 




 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                        


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
# C_2008236EN.01001602.xml

| 13.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/16

---

Action brought on 23 July 2008 — Inditex v OHIM

(Case T-292/08)

(2008/C 236/28)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) (Arteixo, Spain) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri and A. Castán Pérez-Gómez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Roberto Fernando Marín Díaz de Cerio (Logroño, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the action against the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 April 2008 lodged in time and in the required form and, via the appropriate procedure, order the annulment of that decision in respect of all or part of the goods refused. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the action against the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 April 2008 lodged in time and in the required form and, via the appropriate procedure, order the annulment of that decision in respect of all or part of the goods refused.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘OFTEN’ (application No 2 798 270) for goods and services in Classes 3, 9, 14, 16, 18, 25 and 35.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Roberto Fernando Marín Díaz de Cerio.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Spanish word and figurative marks ‘OLTEN’ and Spanish figurative mark ‘OLTENWATCH’ for goods in Class 14.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upholding in part of the opposition.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Principally, infringement of Articles 61(1) and 62(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark and, as a subsidiary plea, infringement of Articles 43(2) and 8(1)(b) of that regulation.

Pleas in law:

---
#### Willard M. NOBLE and Etta M. Noble, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. McCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS, a corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Willard M. NOBLE and Etta M. Noble, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. McCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS, a corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 72-2021 and 72-2042.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 20, 1976.

Richard Haas (argued), Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellants.

Timothy H. Fine (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.

*

 Honorable William P. Gray, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation.

ORDER

Before BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and GRAY,* District Judge.

The petition for rehearing was held pending the decision in *GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Continental T. V., Inc.,*537 F.2d 980 (9th Cir. 1976). It is now denied.

As noted in the opinion in this case (see note 14), this case and *GTE Sylvania*deal with different questions. This case and *Schwinn*involve the legality of restrictions upon the territory in which a purchasing dealer may resell. The majority opinion in *GTE Sylvania*considers whether “Sylvania’s practice of fixing by agreement the locations from which Continental was authorized to sell Sylvania’s products was illegal *per se*under Section 1 of the Sherman Act.” *Id.*at 982. The majority opinion in *GTE Sylvania*approves the result reached in this case. However, it disapproves “any language in the *Noble*opinion *[Noble v. McClatchy Newspapers,*9 Cir., 533 F.2d 1081] that may be inconsistent with any of the majority’s language” in *GTE. Id.*at 1004 n.42. Accordingly, we have reexamined the opinions in both cases. We conclude that there are no inconsistencies between them and therefore make no modification of the language of the opinion in this case.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unify Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Todd E. Wille, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Dated: March 8, 2011

/s/ TODD E. WILLETodd E. WilleChief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Unify Corporation and will be retained by Unify Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




---
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE 04360A205
EXHIBIT
23.1











CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED


PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-81214) pertaining to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust of
Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-07147) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of Tandy Leather Factory,
Inc. of our report dated March 25, 2010, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.











WEAVER
AND TIDWELL, L.L.P.





Fort
Worth, Texas


March 25,
2010
EXHIBIT 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors Timeline, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-4386 and 333-2190) on Form S-8 of Timeline, Inc. of our report dated May 9, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Timeline, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the March 31, 2005, annual report on Form 10-KSB/A Amendment No. 1 of Timeline, Inc.

Our report dated May 9, 2004, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has suffered recurring losses and has an accumulated deficit at March 31, 2004, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

| /s/   KPMG LLP        |   |
|-----------------------|--------|
|                       |   |
| Seattle,   Washington |   |
| October 24, 2005      |   |
Exhibit 23.5

                          REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Speech Design GmbH


We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Speech Design Gmbh and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, adn the related statements of
income and cash flows for the two years in the period ended December 31, 1997.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Speech Design
GmbH and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the consolidated
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in
the period ended December 31, 1997, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.



                                                     Coopers & Lybrand

Munich, Germany
March 17, 1998
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), Stephen S.
Schwartz, Chief Executive Officer of Asyst Technologies, Inc. (the Company), and Robert J. Nikl,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge: 1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, to which
this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: June 29, 2005 /s/ STEPHEN S. SCHWARTZ
    
/s/ ROBERT J. NIKLStephen S. Schwartz, Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer
    
    Robert J. Nikl
Chief Financial Officer
 This certification is not deemed to be filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification is
not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                 SUBSIDIARIES OF GRAND HAVANA ENTERPRISES, INC.

        Each of the following is a 100% owned subsidiary of Grand Havana
Enterprises, Inc.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
               Name                              Jurisdiction of Incorporation
               ----                              -----------------------------
<S>                                              <C>
Love's Enterprises, Inc.                                 California
Grand Havana Room-- Delaware, Inc.                       Delaware
Grand Havana Room-- New York, Inc.                       New York
Grand Havana Room-- Washington, Corp.                    District of Columbia
On Canon, Inc.                                           California
Hopping Jalapeno, Inc.                                   California
Grand Havana Room-- California, Inc.
 (formerly, Havana, Inc.)                                California
Grand Havana House of Cigars
 (formerly, Club Havana, Inc.)                           Delaware
</TABLE>

                                      34
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

OP 23 — 0734 

VICTORIA DESCHAMPS, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

MONTANA TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL 

DISTRICT COURT, RAVALLI COUNTY, 

HONORABLE HOWARD F. RECHT, 

PRESIDING JUDGE, 

GRANT OF MOTION TO 

PROCEED WITHOUT 

PAYMENT OF FILING FEE 

Respondent. 

Motion to proceed without payment of the filing fee in this matter is 

GRANTED. 

DATED: December 20, 2023. 

BOWEN GREENWOOD 

Clerk of the Supreme Court 

12/20/2023

Case Number: OP 23-0734
##### 



Exhibit 11.1
 IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CALCULATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
  Year ended December 31,2005
    
    2004
    
    2003(audited)
    
    (audited)
    
    (audited)BASICNet (loss) income, available to common shareholders
    
    $
    (626,063
    )
    
    $
    138,613
    
    
    $
    260,629Common shares outstanding at January 1
    
    
    48,323,329
    
    
    
    48,245,395
    
    
    
    48,179,805Common shares outstanding at December 31
    
    
    63,612,198
    
    
    
    48,323,329
    
    
    
    48,245,395Weighted average common shares outstanding
    
    
    50,901,382
    
    
    
    48,287,261
    
    
    
    48,205,554Net (loss) income available to common
shareholders, per common share
    
    $
    (12.30
    )
    
    $
    2.87
    
    
    $
    5.41DILUTEDNet (loss) income
    
    $
    (623,399
    )
    
    $
    138,613
    
    
    $
    260,629Weighted average common shares outstanding
    
    
    50,901,382
    
    
    
    48,287,261
    
    
    
    48,205,554Dilutive effect of share options (except where anti-dilutive)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    89,604
    
    
    
    97,025Total
    
    
    50,901,382
    
    
    
    48,376,865
    
    
    
    48,302,579Net (loss) income per common share
    
    $
    (12.30
    )
    
    $
    2.87
    
    
    $
    5.40
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4484 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4484

 To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to prohibit the 
 imposition of a nondisclosure agreement as a condition of the payment 
 of any award or settlement in connection with a violation of such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 2017

  Mr. Stewart (for himself and Ms. Bonamici) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to prohibit the 
 imposition of a nondisclosure agreement as a condition of the payment 
 of any award or settlement in connection with a violation of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Victims' Voice and Transparency 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING IMPOSITION OF NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT AS CONDITION 
              OF AWARD OR SETTLEMENT UNDER CONGRESSIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY 
              ACT OF 1995.

    (a) Prohibition.--Section 401 of the Congressional Accountability 
Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1401) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Except as otherwise provided'' and 
        inserting ``(a) Procedures Available.--Except as otherwise 
        provided''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(b) Prohibiting Imposition of Nondisclosure Agreements.--A 
nondisclosure agreement may not be imposed on any party as a condition 
of the payment of any award or settlement in connection with a 
violation of part A of title II.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to awards and settlements paid in connection with 
the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 on or after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```