alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      10.10**





**GRAND
      HAVANA ENTERPRISES, INC.**


**1990
      Westwood Boulevard, Penthouse**


**Los
      Angeles, CA 90025**












September
      26, 2004














Mr.
      Harry
      Shuster


1990
      Westwood Boulevard, Third Floor


Los
      Angeles, California 90025








Dear
      Mr.
      Shuster:





When
      countersigned by you below, this letter will set forth our understanding and
      constitute our agreement as to the following:





As
      of
      September 26, 2004, Grand Havana Enterprises, Inc. (the “ Company ”)
      is
      indebted to you in the total amount of $2,435,050.42, which represents
      $1,722,974.31 in principal and $712,076.11 in unpaid interest accrued as of
      the
      date hereof, as a result of that certain Promissory Note, dated March 1, 2004,
      in the principal amount of $2,500,900.81 (the “ Outstanding
      Promissory Note ”).
      You
      hereby acknowledge and agree that the Outstanding Promissory Note is hereby
      cancelled and terminated effective as of the date hereof, without any further
      liability or obligations by the Company thereunder and, in consideration for
      such cancellation and termination, the Company will issue to you a new,
      unsecured promissory note in the amount of $2,435,050.42.





This
      letter agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts by original or
      facsimile signature, each of which when so executed will be deemed to be an
      original, and all of which together will be deemed to constitute one and the
      same agreement.











If
      the
      foregoing is in accordance with your understanding, please so indicate by
      signing where provided below and returning one fully-signed copy hereof to
      us,
      whereupon this letter will constitute an agreement fully binding on the parties
      hereto in accordance with its terms under the laws of the State of
      California.






Very truly yours,GRAND
                HAVANA ENTERPRISES, INC.,
              a
                Delaware corporationBy:
            /s/
              Stanley ShusterName: Stanley ShusterTitle:
              President  AGREED
      AND ACCEPTED:








By: /s/
      Harry Shuster


Harry
      Shuster





2
Amendment to Employment Agreement - David E. Hooston and the Registrant



 EXHIBIT 10.17 
  
 AMENDMENT TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This Amendment to
Employment Agreement (“Amendment”), dated as of October 26, 2004 (“Effective Date”), is entered into by and between PLACER SIERRA BANCSHARES (“PLSB”) and DAVID E. HOOSTON (“Employee”). 
  
 A. PLSB and Employee are parties to that certain Employment Agreement, dated
January 1, 2003 and subsequent amendments to that agreement (jointly as “Agreement”). 
  
 B. The Agreement referred to the Company as First California Bancshares, a California Corporation. PLSB is the current name of Company and it assumes the
duties and benefits of the Agreement. PLSB and Employee seek to confirm the employment status of Employee with PLSB. 
  
 C. PLSB and Employee desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 
  
 Now, therefore, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 
  
 AMENDMENT 
  
 1. Reporting Responsibility. Employee shall hereafter report directly to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PLSB. This amendment will not
alter Employee’s compensation or benefits which will continue to be received pursuant to the terms of the Agreement. 
  
 2. Affirmation. In order to induce each other to enter into this Amendment, the parties hereby confirm that all terms and provisions of the
Agreement have been and continue to be in all respects in full force and effect, and no violation of the terms and conditions of the Agreement has occurred. 
  
 3. Amendment. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, this Amendment shall not alter, amend, or otherwise modify the terms and provisions
of the Agreement. From and after the Effective Date, all references in the Agreement to “the Agreement,” “this Agreement” or any similar reference shall refer to the Agreement as amended by this Amendment. Capitalized words or
terms used in this Amendment are defined words or terms, the definitions of which are set forth in the Agreement unless otherwise defined in this Amendment. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date. 
  

									
	PLACER SIERRA BANCSHARES	 	 	 	 
					
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Ronald W. Bachli
	 	 	 	 	 	 /s/ David E. Hooston

	 Its:
	 	 Chairman and CEO
	 	 	 	 	 	DAVID E. HOOSTON

  

 -1-
# C_2010288EN.01003701.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — 4care v OHIM — Laboratorios Diafarm (Acumed)

(Case T-575/08) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Acumed - Earlier national word mark AQUAMED ACTIVE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2010/C 288/70)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: 4care AG (Kiel, Germany) (represented by: S. Redeker and M. Diesbach, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Laboratorios Diafarm, SA (Barberà del Vallès, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 October 2008 (Case R 1636/2007-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Laboratorios Diafarm, SA and 4care AG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders 4care AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders 4care AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Page S6105]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      MESSAGES FROM THE PRESIDENT

  Messages from the President of the United States were communicated to 
the Senate by Mr. Pate, one of his secretaries.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of  FORESIGHT SPECIALISTS, INC.,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kevin Ericksteen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Kevin
Ericksteen


Kevin
Ericksteen


Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




Date: September
18, 2008
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

August 11, 2005

U. S. Securities andExchange Commission450 Fifth Street, N. W.Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The certification set forth below is being submitted tothe Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying withSection         1350 of Chapter 63 ofTitle 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not to be deemed tobe filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does notconstitute a part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”)accompanying this letter and is not to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any generalincorporation language in such filing.

I, J. William Holden, III, the Senior VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of Mirant Americas Generation, LLC (the “Company”),certify that, subject to the qualifications noted below, to the best of myknowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mirant Americas Generation,LLC.
| Name:    | /s/ J. WILLIAM  HOLDEN, III                     |     |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------|----------|
| * * | *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer* | * * |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Mirant Americas Generation, LLC and willbe retained by Mirant Americas Generation, LLC and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

49

----
# C_2009256EN.01002701.xml

| 24.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/27

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 August 2009 — Abouchar v Commission

(Case T-367/08) (1)

1

(Non-contractual liability - EDF - Conditions for the grant and control of credits for an agricultural holding project in Senegal - Limitation period - Inadmissibility)

2009/C 256/49

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Michel Abouchar (Dakar, Senegal) (represented by: B. Dubreuil-Basire and J.-J. Lorang, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Bordes and E. Cujo, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for damages to compensate for the material and non-material harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the alleged errors of the Commission and its agents inherent in the conditions of grant and the control of loans financed by the European Development Fund (EDF) for its agricultural holding project in Senegal.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Michel Abouchar is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Michel Abouchar is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 8.11.2008.

1

---
Revised Schedule to Severance Agreements between HMEC and certain officers



 Exhibit 10.12(a) 
  

Revised Schedule to Severance Agreement 
  
 Horace Mann Educators Corporation (“HMEC”) entered into severance agreements with the following persons on the dates shown. These agreements are substantially
identical to the one included as Exhibit 10.7 to HMEC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 except that (1) the multiple of the highest annual compensation received by the employee in the five preceding years used to
determine a one-time cash payment is equal to the duration listed below and (2) the specified period during which such employee’s insurance benefits would continue is equal to the duration below, and except as indicated in footnote (a).

  

					
	 Employee

	  	Duration

	  	Agreement Date


	 Louis G. Lower II (a)
	  	   3 years	  	02-01-2000
			
	 Ann M. Caparrós
	  	2.9 years	  	03-07-1994
	 Peter H. Heckman
	  	2.9 years	  	04-10-2000
	 H. Albert Inkel
	  	2.9 years	  	12-27-1991
	 Douglas W. Reynolds
	  	2.9 years	  	11-12-2001
	 Paul D. Andrews
	  	   2 years	  	07-02-2001
	 Bret A. Conklin
	  	   2 years	  	01-14-2002
	 Dwayne D. Hallman
	  	   2 years	  	01-21-2003
	 William S. Hinkle
	  	   2 years	  	07-19-1999
	 Deborah F. Kretchmar
	  	   2 years	  	06-17-2002
	 Ricky A. Renner
	  	   2 years	  	07-09-2001
	 Robert E. Rich
	  	   2 years	  	02-19-2001
	 Peter M. Titone
	  	   2 years	  	01-08-2001



	(a)	HMEC entered into a severance agreement with Louis G. Lower II as set forth in the Lower Employment Agreement contained in Exhibit 10.12 to HMEC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1475]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. BARBARA LEE

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Tuesday, September 11, 2012

  Ms. LEE of California. Mr. Speaker, I was not present for rollcall 
votes 557-559. Had I been able to vote, I would have voted ``yes'' on 
all three votes.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 10.62
Ms. Hilary S. Ware is an executive officer of Hanover. On January 13, 2004 the Board of Directorsadopted a resolution approving change of control protection for Ms. Ware, among others. Theresolution provides that Ms. Ware is eligible for a change of control payment of 1x her base salaryplus target bonus with no excise tax gross up payments. No formal agreement documenting sucharrangement has been entered into with Ms. Ware as of March 11, 2005. Additionally, at the sametime the Board approved change in control protection to all employees to provide acceleratedvesting of all long-term incentives and a vesting of the Company’s match under the Hanover 401(k)plan. Ms. Ware would benefit from such resolution in the event of a change in control of Hanover.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6362

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

IAN MCDONALD, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:05-cr-00146-WDQ-1; 1:08-cv-02091-WDQ-1) 

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 19, 2009 

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Ian McDonald, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Joseph Leotta, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Ian McDonald seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that McDonald has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2769

_____________________________

BRANDY LESHEE WATERS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

Clifton A. Drake, Judge.

May 6, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

LEWIS, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iPayment, Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I Clay M. Whitson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(c)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(d)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

This Certification is executed as of May 10, 2006.

                 /s/ CLAY M. WHITSON
                 -----------------------------------
                 CLAY M. WHITSON
                 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 20(b)

                    ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


                          Officer's Certificate
                          ---------------------

     I, George E. Borst, President and Chief Executive Officer of Toyota Motor
Credit Corporation ("TMCC"), hereby certify as follows:

     (a)  a review of the activities of TMCC as Servicer under the Sales and
          Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated September 1, 2000 among
          TMCC, Toyota Motor Credit Receivables Corporation as Seller, and
          U.S. Bank as Trustee, for the period from October 1, 2000 through
          March 31, 2001 and of the performance of the Servicer under the
          Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

     (b)  to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
          fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such
          period.



Date:  May 10, 2001                           /S/ GEORGE E. BORST
                                        ------------------------------------
                                                  George E. Borst
                                                   President and
                                              Chief Executive Officer
# Cfhe TOWN OF NORWOOD Commonwealth o Ma ssac husttts :___ 

# _______________________ _:__ 

# ___ _________ _ _____________ _ _ ____

OFFICE ADDRESS 12 5 Acces s Road Norwood, MA 02062

November 4, 2010 William Haney 415 Beacon Street Boston, MA 02115 

## NorwoodMemorialAirport Russ Maguire, A.A.E., ACE , Airport Manager



### CERTIFIED MAIL MAILIN G ADDRESS 125 Acces s Road Norw ood, MA 02062



### RE: Unauthorized Helicopter Operations; DC-3 Apron, Norwood Airport Dear Bill : On Saturday, October 23, 2010, it was brought to my attention by the Assistant Airport Manager, Mark Raymond, that you had been attempting to conduct helicopter operations from the airport's DC-3 apron. Mr. Raymond was correct in informing you that those operations are not authorized on the DC-3 apron . In fact, helicopter operations from that apron have never been authorized-to any parties-in the 15+ years that I've been the airport manager here at Norwood . At the present time, the DC-3 apron is under direct Town control, with no leasehold(s) . I can therefore say unequivocally that any authorization, or perceived authorization , granted to you for flight operations to/from the DC-3 apron is unfounded. However, as I've discussed with you in the past, you're welcome to consider operating from a leased helicopter parking circle on the south end of the north/south taxi-lane . The use restrictions for this operating area do require the helicopter owner to remove the helicopter prior to snow events, so that the paved surface can be plowed . Also, as you know, the helicopter would require towing from time to time, to include during the aforementioned time periods. The lease rate for a helicopter parking circle is $265 per quarter and would require you to enter into a written lease with the Norwood Airport Commission . In closing, during the time in which Mr. Raymond contacted me on October 23, he was being subjected to a heated verbal assault and reproach by you; this, after you were informed by him that you could not operate your helicopter from the DC-3 apron. It bears underscoring that, in my absence, Mr. Raymond is the airport manager. He furthermore

Phone: (781) 255-5615 I Fax: (781) 255-5617 I nnaguire@norwoodma.gov I VOICE!ITY - Use Phone Rela)represents the airport authority, which is the Norwood Airport Commission. To preserve the peace, Mr. Raymond did contact the Norwood Police. I would ask that in the future, Bill, you present a more controlled demeanor, which, in tum, will invite a more productive exchange . Thank you. Sincerely,

# ~~~ Russ Maguire, Manager Norwood Memorial Airport



### CC: NorwoodAirport Commission 

# ®
Description of Director Compensation.



 EXHIBIT 10.15 
  
 Description of Director Compensation 
  
 Each director of the Crescent Banking Company (the “Company”), with the exception of J. Donald Boggus, Jr.,
currently receives $1,000 per fiscal quarter in compensation for service as director, and each director of Crescent Bank & Trust Company (the “Bank”), with the exception of J. Donald Boggus, Jr., currently receives $375 per fiscal
quarter plus $1,000 for each meeting attended in compensation for service as a director. In addition, the Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors receives an annual fee of $5,000 and the Chairman of the Bank’s Board of Directors
receives an annual fee of $2,500 for their services at these positions. Members of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee of the Company, which also serve as the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee of the Bank, receive an additional
fee of $400 and $250, respectively, for each committee meeting attended. Members of the Loan Committee, the Asset/Liability and Investment Committee, the Mortgage Banking Committee and the Executive Committee of the Bank receive fees of $250 for
each meeting attended. The Company also awards stock options to its outside directors pursuant to the 2001 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan. In addition, directors receive compensation in the form of split-dollar life insurance for which the
Company or the Bank pays the premiums. Directors may also participate in the Director Supplemental Retirement Plan, the benefits of which are funded from life insurance purchased and owned by the Company or the Bank. The compensation of directors
may be changed from time to time by the Board of Directors upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee without shareholder approval.