UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549




FORM 20-F






 ̈  REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


OR




ý  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2010


OR




 ̈  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the transition period from ________________________ to ___________________


OR




 ̈ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





Date of event requiring this shell company report ________________________





Commission file number 000-21968





BRAZAURO RESOURCES CORPORATION


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


N/A


(Translation of the Registrant’s name into English)





British Columbia, Canada


(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)





16360 Park Ten Place, Suite 217


Houston, TX 77084


(Address of principal executive offices)





Brian C. Irwin, (281) 579-3400, bcirwin@shaw.ca / (281) 579-9799,


771 Mariner Way, Parksville, B.C., Canada  V9P 1S4


(Name, Telephone, E-mail and /or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)





Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:NONE





Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:COMMON STOCK




Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:NONE




Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.




92,897,320 Common Shares, as of January 31, 2010














Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.      Yes  oNo  x




If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.      Yes  oNo  x




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:  (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  xNo  o





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period the registrant was required to submit and post such files).       Yes  oNo  o





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):     Large accelerated filer  o Accelerated filer  o Non-accelerated filer  x




Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:


o  U.S. GAAP
o  International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
x  Other


If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow Item 17  xItem 18  o







If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes  o    No  x





















BRAZAURO RESOURCES CORPORATION


FORM 20-F


TABLE OF CONTENTS








Item Number

Page

NumberItem 1.
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
1Item 2.
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
1Item 3.
Key Information
1Item 4.
Information on the Company
5Item 4A.
Unresolved Staff Comments
13Item 5.
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
13Item 6.
Directors, Senior Management and Employees
20Item 7.
Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
28Item 8.
Financial Information
30Item 9.
The Offer and Listing
31Item 10.
Additional Information
32Item 11.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
43Item 12.
Descriptions of Securities Other than Equity Securities
44PART IIItem 13.
Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
44Item 14.
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
44Item 15T.
Controls and Procedures
45Item 16A.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
46Item 16B.
Code of Ethics
46Item 16C.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
46Item 16D.
Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
47Item 16E.
Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
47Item 16F.
Change in Registrant’s Certifying Account
47Item 16G.
Corporate Governance
47PART IIIItem 17.
Financial Statements
47Item 18.
Financial Statements
48Item 19.
Exhibits
48Signatures

49




i





Item 1.
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors





This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.





Item 2.
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable





This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.





Item 3.
Key Information





A.
Selected Financial Data





The selected consolidated financial information set forth below for each of the five years ended January 31, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 has been derived from the consolidated financial statements of Brazauro Resources Corporation (“the Company”) for the years indicated and is expressed in Canadian dollars.  The selected consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with the discussion in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes thereto included on pages 50 to 85 herein.  References in this Annual Report on Form 20-F to “Notes” are intended to refer to the Notes to the consolidated financial statements included herein.




In this Annual Report on Form 20-F all currency refers to Canadian Dollars (Cad$) unless indicated otherwise.




Since its formation, the Company’s activities have consisted primarily of acquiring interests in mineral properties, exploration of those properties and acquiring financing for such purposes.  Consequently, the selected consolidated financial data may not indicate the Company’s future financial performance.





Selected Consolidated Financial Data





Fiscal Year Ended January 312010


2009


2008


2007


2006(000’s except for net loss per common share data)Operating revenues


-



-



-



-



-Write-down of mineral properties


-



21



685



796



907Net loss for the year


(4,641
)


(3,280
)


(4,481
)


(5,193
)


(8,259
)Basic and diluted net loss per share


(0.05
)


(0.04
)


(0.06
)


(0.10
)


(0.17
)Working capital


4,893



4,586



3,005



4,518



8,611Total assets


35,922



35,315



30,640



11,330



13,498Total liabilities


855



1,853



2,671



412



354Net assets


35,066



33,462



27,969



10,918



13,144Common share capital


86,516



82,106



74,807



53,729



53,433Dividends per share


-



-



-



-



-Weighted average shares outstanding


87,126



81,054



74,837



53,063



49,112





The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Canada (“Canadian GAAP”), which differ in certain respects from the principles the Company would have followed had its consolidated financial statements been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“United States GAAP”).  A discussion of differences between Canadian GAAP and United States GAAP is contained in Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements.




1




If the Company had followed United States GAAP, certain items in the consolidated financial statements would have been reported as follow:


Selected Consolidated Financial Data (United States GAAP)





Fiscal Year Ended January 312010


2009


2008


2007


2006(000’s except for net loss per common share data)Operating revenues


-



-



-



-



-Write-down of mineral properties


-



-



115



31



109Net loss for the year


(5,763
)


(6,033
)


(6,106
)


(6,174
)


(9,289
)Basic and diluted net loss per common share


(0.07
)


(0.07
)


(0.08
)


(0.12
)


(0.19
)Working capital


4,893



4,586



3,005



4,518



8,611Total assets


26,690



27,234



25,284



7,598



10,747Total liabilities


855



1,853



2,671



412



354Net assets


25,835



25,381



22,613



7,186



10,393Common share capital


86,516



82,106



74,807



53,729



53,433Dividends per share


-



-



-



-



-Weighted average common shares outstanding


87,126



81,054



74,837



53,063



49,112





Exchange Rates





On June 30, 2010, the noon exchange rate for the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar according to the Bank of Canada, was Cad$1.00 = U.S. $0.9429. Bank of Canada exchange rates are nominal quotations, not buying or selling rates, and are intended for statistical or analytical purposes. Rates available from financial institutions will differ.





The following table sets forth, for each of the years between 2006 and 2008, additional information with respect to the noon buying rate for Cad$1.00.  Such rates are set forth as U.S. dollars per Canadian $1.00 and are based upon the rates quoted by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. For years 2009 and 2010 was used the information with respect  the noon exchange rate for the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar according to the Bank of Canada nominal quote.





Rate

2010


2009


2008


2007


2006Average (1)


0.8917



0.9239



0.9508



0.9419



0.8844





(1) The average rate means the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the year.





Canadian/United States Dollar Exchange Rates for the Previous Six Months


Rate

January,
2010


February, 2010


March,
2010


April,
2010


May,

2010


June,

2010High


0.9780



0.9642



0.9938



1.0052



0.9900



0.9864Low


0.9350



0.9283



0.9470



0.9799



0.9218



0.9391




2





B.
Capitalization and Indebtedness





This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.





C.
Reason for the Offer and Use of Proceeds





This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.





D.
Risk Factors





An investment in the Company’s common shares is highly speculative and subject to a number of risks. Only those investors who can bear the risk of the entire loss of their investment should participate, and an investor should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and with Canadian securities regulators before investing in the Company’s common shares.  Additional risks that the Company is unaware of or that are currently believed to be immaterial may become important factors that affect the Company’s business. If any of the following risks occur, or if others occur, the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely impacted.





The Company’s business plan to acquire additional exploration prospects, continue exploration activities on its current projects, and, if warranted, undertake development and mining operations, is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including the following:





Lack of Proven Properties and Development Funds.  At this point, all of the Company’s exploration prospects and property interests (collectively the “Properties”) are gold prospects in Brazil, and the Company has no income from operations.  While the Company has sufficient funds to complete the exploration phase currently underway, additional funds will likely be necessary in order for the Company to pursue further exploration on its existing properties and to acquire and develop additional exploration prospects.  Certain of the Company’s planned expenditures are discretionary and may be increased or decreased based upon funds available to the Company.





As of June 30, 2010, the Company had sufficient cash to fund general and administrative expenses and to complete planned exploration payments during fiscal 2011.  As discussed above, the Company will likely be required to raise additional capital for additional exploration activity on its existing properties and acquisition of new exploration prospects subsequent to fiscal 2011.  There can be no assurance that additional funds can be raised.  See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”.





Limited Exploration Prospects.The Company’s existing properties are all gold prospects in Brazil.  Accordingly, the Company does not have a diversified portfolio of exploration prospects either geographically or by mineral targets.  The Company’s operations could be significantly affected by changes in the market price of gold, as the economic viability of the Company’s projects is heavily dependent upon the market price of gold.  Additionally, the Company’s projects are subject to the laws of Brazil and can be negatively impacted by the existing laws and regulations of that country, as they apply to mineral exploration, land ownership, royalty interests and taxation, and by any potential changes of such laws and regulations.





Title to Properties.  The Company cannot guarantee title to all of its Properties as the Properties may be subject to prior mineral rights applications with priority, prior unregistered agreements or transfers or native land claims, and title may be affected by undetected defects.  Certain of the mineral rights held by the Company are held under applications for mineral rights and, until final approval of such applications is received, the Company’s rights to such mineral rights may not materialize and the exact boundaries of the Company’s properties may be subject to adjustment.  The Company does not maintain title insurance on its properties.





Environmental Laws.  The exploration programs conducted by the Company are subject to national, state and/or local regulations regarding environmental considerations in the jurisdiction where they are located.  Most operations involving exploration or production activities are subject to existing laws and regulations relating to exploration and





3





mining procedures, reclamation, safety precautions, employee health and safety, air quality standards, pollution of stream and fresh water sources, odor, noise, dust, and other environmental protection controls adopted by federal, state and local governmental authorities as well as the rights of adjoining property owners.  The Company may be required to prepare and present to federal, state or local authorities data pertaining to the effect or impact that any proposed exploration or production of minerals may have upon the environment.  All requirements imposed by any such authorities may be costly, time consuming, and may delay commencement or continuation of exploration or production operations.  However, at this time, the Company is exploring its Properties and does not anticipate preparing environmental impact statements or assessments until such time as the Company believes one or more of its Properties will prove to be commercially feasible.





Exploration and Development Risks.  The business of exploring for minerals and mining involves a high degree of risk.  Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines.  At present, the Company has prepared a preliminary economic assessment of one of the Company’s properties, the Tocantinzinho Property.  The remaining property is an early stage exploration prospect and the Company has formed no estimate of a potential ore body.  The grade of any ore ultimately mined may differ from that indicated by drilling results.  Major expenses may be required to establish ore reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site.  It is impossible to ensure that the current development programs planned by the Company will result in a profitable commercial mining operation. Mineral deposits and production costs are affected by such factors as environmental permitting regulations and requirements, weather, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations and work interruptions.





Competition.The mineral industry is intensely competitive in all its phases.  The Company competes with many companies possessing greater financial resources and technical facilities than itself for the acquisition of mineral concessions, claims, leases and other mineral interests as well as for the recruitment and retention of qualified employees.





Political Risk.Properties in which the Company has an interest are located in the Amazon basin in Brazil, which may be of particular interest or sensitivity to one or more interest groups.  Consequently, mineral exploration and mining activities in those areas may be affected in varying degrees by political uncertainty, expropriations of property and changes in applicable government policies and regulation such as business laws, environmental laws, native land claims entitlements or procedures and mineral rights and mining laws, affecting the Company’s business in that area.  Any changes in regulations or shifts in political conditions are beyond the control or influence of the Company and may adversely affect its business, or if significant enough, may result in the impairment or loss of mineral concessions or other mineral rights, or may make it impossible to continue its mineral exploration and mining activities in such areas.





Potential Dilution to Existing Shareholders.The Company will require additional financing in order to complete full exploration of its mineral properties.  The Company anticipates that it will have to sell additional equity securities including, but not limited to, its common stock, share purchase warrants or some form of convertible security.  The effect of additional issuances of equity securities will result in dilution to existing shareholders.





Limited Market for Common Shares.The liquidity of the common shares of the Company, or ability of the shareholder to buy or sell the Company’s common stock, may be significantly limited for various unforeseeable periods.  The average daily volume of the Company’s shares traded on the TSX Venture Exchange during fiscal 2010 was approximately 89,000 shares.  The market price of the Company’s shares has historically fluctuated in a large range, as disclosed in “Item 9 - The Offer and Listing”.  The price of the Company’s common shares may be affected by many factors, including adverse change in the Company’s business, a decline in gold price and general economic trends.





Insurance Coverage.  Mineral exploration is subject to risks of human injury, environmental and legal liability and loss of assets.  The Company may elect not to have insurance for certain risks because of the high premiums associated with insuring those risks or, in some cases, insurance may not be available for certain risks.  Occurrence of events for which we are not insured could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.




4





Key Executives.  The Company is dependent on the services of key executives, including its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mark E. Jones, III, its President and Chief Operations Officer, James J. Komadina, its Director and retired President, Leendert G. Krol, and its Vice President of Exploration, Elton L. S. Pereira.  Each of the above individuals has many years of background in the mining industry.  The Company may not be able to replace that experience and knowledge with other individuals.





Fluctuations in Foreign Currency Exchange Rates.  The Company raises its equity in Canadian dollars and its exploration expenditures are generally denominated in Brazilian Reales and United States dollars.  As a result, the Company’s expenditures are subject to foreign currency fluctuations.  Foreign currency fluctuations may materially and adversely increase the Company’s operating expenditures and reduce the amount exploration activities that the Company is able to complete with its current capital. The Company does not engage in any hedging or other transactions to protect itself against such currency fluctuations.





Enforcement of Judgments against the Company.The Company is incorporated in the Province of British Columbia, Canada.  Certain of our directors and officers live in Canada, and many of the Company’s assets are located in Brazil and Canada.  As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of legal process within the United States upon directors and officers who are not United States residents.  Also, there is uncertainty as to the enforceability in Canada, in original actions or for enforcement of judgments of U.S. courts, of civil liabilities predicated upon U.S. federal or state securities laws.





Item 4.
Information on the Company





A.
History and Development of the Company





The Company was incorporated under the Company Act (British Columbia) on March 12, 1986 under the name Texas Star Resources Corporation.  The Company became a public company in January 1988 when it undertook an initial public offering of its Common Stock in British Columbia, Canada and became listed on the Vancouver Stock Exchange, a predecessor to the TSX Venture Exchange.  The Company’s name was amended to Star Resources Corp. in October 1996 and was further amended to Jaguar Resources Corporation in July 2003.  In September 2004, the Company’s name was changed to Brazauro Resources Corporation.





The authorized capital of the Company consists of an unlimited amount of shares of common stock without par value (the “Common Stock”), of which 93,846,055 shares were issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2010.  The Common Stock of the Company ranks equally as to dividends, voting rights and participation in assets and is traded under the symbol “BZO” on the TSX Venture Exchange.





The Company’s principal office is located at 16360 Park Ten Place, Suite 217, Houston, Texas, U.S.A. 77084, and its phone number is (281) 579-3400.  The Company’s website may be found at www.brazauroresources.com.





The Company is engaged in the business of exploring for and, if warranted, developing mineral properties and is concentrating its current acquisition and exploration efforts on those properties which the Company believes have large scale gold potential.  From inception and prior to 1988 the Company had limited business activities and through 1993 explored and abandoned several mineral properties.  During fiscal 1993, the Company elected to pursue prospects with the potential for commercial diamond production.





The Company completed three acquisitions in fiscal 1993 consistent with its focus on diamond exploration prospects in the United States.  During fiscal 1995 through 2003, the Company completed additional acquisitions in the United States and directly managed and funded exploration efforts on certain properties.  In fiscal 2003 the Company decided to cease exploration efforts in Arkansas due to disappointing exploration results, and began to pursue mineral exploration prospects, particularly gold prospects in South America.





From fiscal 2003 through the present, the Company has concentrated its efforts on gold prospects in Brazil and currently holds interests in properties located in the Tapajós Gold District of Brazil’s northerly Pará State.





5




The Company and Eldorado Gold Corp. have signed an agreement whereby Eldorado will acquire, through a court-approved plan of arrangement under the laws of British Columbia, all of the outstanding common shares of the Company (the “Brazauro Shares”) for total consideration consisting of common shares of Eldorado (the “Eldorado Shares”) having a value of approximately $122.4-million (including the value of new Brazauro).




Under the arrangement, each Brazauro Share will be exchanged for 0.0675 Eldorado Share, which together with the contemplated spin-out of TriStar Gold Inc. would value the Company at $1.33 per share, representing a premium of 92 per cent to the closing price of Brazauro Shares on the TSX Venture Exchange, as at May 11, 2010. In addition, as part of the transaction, Eldorado has agreed to finance, with C$10-million, a new exploration company that will contain certain exploration properties currently owned by the Company. Each shareholder of the Company, other than Eldorado, will receive one share of TriStar Gold Inc. for each three Brazauro shares in addition to 0.0675 Eldorado Share for each Brazauro Share.  TriStar Gold Inc. will hold the Bom Jardim and Andorinhas exploration properties presently held by the Company together with the C$10 million to be provided by Eldorado.




The arrangement has been approved by the boards of directors of Eldorado and the Company and will be subject to, among other things, approval by securityholders of the Company at a special meeting of securityholders of the Company convened for July 15, 2010 to approve the transaction. Officers and directors of the Company, representing approximately 8.9 per cent of the Company’s outstanding shares, options and warrants, have entered into lock-up and support arrangements with Eldorado under which they have agreed to vote in favor of the transaction. Eldorado owns 14,326,000 of the Company’s common shares and 4,916,000 warrants representing approximately 17.2 per cent of Brazauro on a fully diluted basis.




The British Columbia Supreme Court has issued an interim order in connection with the plan of arrangement which, if approved by securityholders of the Company, will implement the proposed acquisition of the Company by Eldorado Gold Corp.




The interim order provides for the calling of a special meeting of the securityholders of the Company to consider the arrangement. The arrangement is subject to, among other things, the final approval of the British Columbia Supreme Court, receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals, the approval by at least 662⁄3 per cent of the votes cast by the holders of common shares of the Company, at least 662⁄3 per cent of the votes cast by holders of options and warrants of the Company and shareholders, the approval by a simple majority of shareholders (excluding Eldorado and any other shareholders excluded by Multilateral Instrument 61-101), and the satisfaction or waiver of other conditions precedent to the arrangement. The hearing in respect of the final order to approve the arrangement is currently scheduled to take place on or about July 16, 2010, with the completion of the arrangement to occur no later than July 20, 2010.




The meeting will be held on July 15, 2010, at suite 2600, 595 Burrard St., Vancouver, B.C., at 10 a.m. (Vancouver Time). Securityholders of the Company of record as of 5 p.m. (Vancouver time) on June 10, 2010, will be entitled to attend and vote at the meeting.




In the event that the transaction is not completed, the Company has agreed to pay Eldorado a termination fee equal to $4.8million, under certain circumstances. Brazauro has also provided Eldorado with certain other customary rights, including a right to match competing offers. the Company has received a fairness opinion in respect of the transaction from BMO Capital Markets Inc.




Principal Capital Expenditures During The Three Most Recent Fiscal Years





In February 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of certain mineral rights to the Tocantinzinho Property via the acquisition of the following three corporations.  The Company acquired Resource Holdings 2004 Inc. (“RH 2004”, a British Virgin Islands corporation), and its subsidiary, Empresa Internacional de Mineração do Brasil Ltda. (“EIMB”, a Brazil corporation), in exchange for the issuance of 13,150,000 common shares of the Company and the payment of $50,000 (U.S.) to a third party.  Additionally, the Company acquired Mineração Cachambix Ltda.





6





(“Cachambix”, a Brazil corporation) from third parties upon payment of $850,000 (U.S.) and two future payments of $1,000,000 (U.S.) each, due and paid in February 2008 and 2009.





In fiscal 2008, the Company performed additional exploration activities at the Tocantinzinho Properties, resulting in the capitalization of approximately $1,623,000 in exploration expenditures in addition to the capitalization of acquisition costs totaling approximately $17,902,000 and primarily related to the acquisition discussed in the preceding paragraph.  At the Company’s Crepori Property, exploration activities including soil sampling and a diamond drilling program were completed.  Based upon the results of the exploration, the Company elected to terminate the option agreement at Crepori in April 2008.  Accordingly, the capitalized acquisition and exploration costs totaling approximately $577,000 were written off in fiscal 2008.





In fiscal 2009, the Company performed additional exploration activities at the Tocantinzinho and Bom Jardim Properties, resulting in the capitalization of approximately $2,122,000 and $520,000, respectively, in exploration expenditures in addition to the capitalization of acquisition costs totaling approximately $154,000 and $38,000, respectively. At the Company’s Crepori Property, additional exploration costs totaling approximately $21,000 were written off in fiscal 2009.





In July 2008, the Company entered into an option agreement under which it may acquire the mineral rights to the 20,688 hectare Piranha Property, located in Pará State.  The Company has an option to earn 100% of the Piranha Property, with no residual production royalty obligations, by payment of a total of $1,800,000 (Brazilian Reals) over three years. Exploration activities were conducted at the Company’s Piranha Property during fiscal 2009, resulting in the capitalization of acquisition and exploration costs of approximately $12,000 and $83,000, respectively.





In August 2009, the Company entered into another option agreement under which it may acquire the mineral rights to an additional 7,229 hectare property in the Piranhas area. The Company has an option to earn a 100% interest in this property, with no residual production royalty obligations, by payment of a total of BR$700,000 over three years. An initial payment of BR$20,000 was made in September 2009.





In December 2009, the Company entered into an option agreement under which it may acquire the mineral rights to an additional 7,404 hectare property in the Piranhas area. The Company has an option to earn a 100% interest in this property, by payment of a total of BR$2,500,000 over three years. An initial payment of approximately $42,000 (BR$75,000) was made in January 2010. The vendor will retain a 0.5% net smelter royalty, which the Company can repurchase for BR$3,000,000.





In fiscal 2010, the Company performed additional exploration activities at the Tocantinzinho, Bom Jardim and Piranhas Properties, resulting in the capitalization of approximately $62,000,  $568,000 and $335,000, respectively, in exploration expenditures in addition to the capitalization of acquisition costs totaling approximately $53,000, nil  and $63,000, respectively.





In May 2010, the Company decided to abandon certain mineral claims in the Bom Jardim area due to poor exploration results. As a result, the property was written-down by $929,848.




In December 2009, the Company entered into an option agreement under which it may acquire 100% of the Agua Branca Property, which consists of approximately 9,356 hectares of exploration licenses in the Tapajós region of Pará state, Brazil, in consideration for option payments of US$60,000 on signing of the agreement, made in December 2009, an additional US$60,000 due upon publication of the exploration licenses by the Brazilian National Department of Mineral Production (“DNPM”), made on May 2010, and US$2,000,000 in two years from the date of the definitive agreement. To maintain the option, the Company has to spend at least US$500,000 on the property in each of the first two years which includes at least 2,000 meters of core drilling in the first year. In addition, the Company will assume all existing commercial obligations on the property. The vendor will retain a 2% net smelter royalty, which the Company can repurchase for US$2,000,000.




7




In fiscal 2010, the Company exploration activities at the Agua Property resulted in the capitalization of exploration expenditures for approximately $153,000, plus the capitalization of acquisition costs totaling approximately $63,000.




B.
Business Overview





The Company is engaged in the business of exploring for and, if warranted, developing mineral properties and is concentrating its current acquisition and exploration efforts on those properties which the Company believes have large scale gold potential.  The Company holds interests in properties located in the Tapajós Gold District of Brazil’s northerly Pará State.





The Company’s mission is to discover and outline significant gold mineralization at its projects to bring on a major mining partner for development of its Properties.  Upon acquisition of an exploration property, the Company typically performs geologic evaluation and exploration efforts to determine if the project warrants further work including, but not limited to geologic mapping and sampling, geophysical surveys, and drilling.  The Company will continue to pursue mineral exploration prospects, focusing on the Tapajós and on a worldwide basis as opportunities arise, subject to adequate acquisition and exploration funding.





The Tapajós Gold District has a rich history of alluvial gold production.  During the 1970’s and 1980’s, the Tapajós area annually produced approximately 30% to 40% of Brazil’s total gold output.  Geologically, the Tapajós region is situated within the gold-productive, Archaean to Middle Proterozoic-aged Brazilian Shield that extends from Brazil through Guyana and into Venezuela.  In the immediate area of the Company’s projects, granitic basement rocks are intruded by subvolcanic andesitic and rhyolitic bodies, all of lower Proterozoic age.  The widespread alluvial gold deposits point to the area’s strong bedrock exploration potential.





The Company is subject to regulation by the Federal mineral land agency in Brazil, the Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral (“DNPM”).  The Company’s holds exploration licenses or applications for exploration licenses granted by the DNPM for the Tocantinzinho and the Bom Jardim Properties.   Certain of the licenses for the Tocantinzinho Property are subject to periodic requirements for renewal, and the Company anticipates receiving the renewals in the 2010 calendar year.





Since its inception, the Company has had limited revenues from operations other than interest income on invested cash balances and gains on sales of equipment.





C.
Organizational Structure





As of January 31, 2010, the Company had four wholly-owned subsidiaries; Brazauro Holdings (Brazil) Ltd., a British Columbia corporation (“Brazauro Holdings”), Star U.S. Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Star”), Brazauro Holdings (BVI) Ltd., a British Virgin Islands subsidiary, and its British Virgin Islands subsidiary, Resource Holdings 2004 Inc (“RH 2004”).  Star in turn owns 100% of the stock of three corporations, Diamond Exploration, Inc. and Continental Diamonds, Inc., both of which are Arkansas corporations (“DEI” and “CDI”, respectively), and Diamond Operations, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“DOI”).  The Company and Brazauro Holdings own 99.99% and 0.01%, respectively, of the common shares of Brazauro Recursos Minerais Ltda., a Brazilian corporation. Brazauro Recursos Minerais Ltda. and Brazauro Holdings own 99.99% and 0.01%, respectively, of the common shares of Mineração Cachambix Ltda. (“Cachambix”) and of Mineracao Agua Branca Ltda., both Brazilian corporations.  RH 2004 and the Company own 99.99% and 0.01%, respectively, of the common shares of Empresa Internacional de Mineração do Brasil Ltda. (“EIMB”), a Brazilian corporation. All references to the Company herein include its subsidiaries unless otherwise noted.  The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements referred to herein also include its subsidiaries.  The Company’s fiscal year ends January 31.





D.
Properties





Currently, all of the Company’s Properties are located in the Tapajós Gold District of Brazil’s northerly Pará State.  The general location of the Company’s Brazilian Properties Tocantinzinho, Bom Jardim and Agua Branca properties





8





are shown on the map provided below.  The map is followed by a description of the Company’s rights and interests in each of its Properties.











Tocantinzinho Properties





In August 2003, the Company entered into an option to acquire exploration rights to a total of 28,275 hectares in the Tapajós gold district in Pará State, Brazil under an option agreement with two individuals (herein referred to as “optionors”).  The option agreement entitled the Company to acquire a 100% interest in the exploration rights to such area (referred to herein as the “Tocantinzinho Properties”) over a four-year period in consideration for the staged payment of $465,000 (U.S.), the staged issuance of 2,600,000 shares of the Company and the expenditure of $1,000,000 (U.S.) on exploration. As of January 31, 2009, the Company has made all payments due under the option agreement and has met the requirement to expend $1,000,000 (U.S.) on exploration.




9





Additionally, the option agreement required the Company to assume all existing obligations of the optionors to certain Brazilian residents in respect of the mineral rights to the Tocantinzinho Properties (the “Underlying Agreements”) totaling $1,600,000 (U.S.) over a four-year period.  As of January 31, 2009, the Company has made all payments due under the Underlying Agreements.





In fiscal 2006, the Company received exploration licenses in respect of the central 4,000 hectare area of the Tocantinzinho Properties on which it has been focusing its exploration efforts as well as for a 9,315 hectare area forming the north eastern and eastern boundary of the Tocantinzinho Properties.  Under the option agreement, the Company also holds rights to acquire two other applications for exploration licenses filed with the regulatory authorities in Brazil:  one covering 4,275 hectares that lies to the south of the central 4,000 hectare area and one (the “Extension Area”) covering 10,000 hectares that lies immediately to the east but continues well south of the central 4,000 hectare area.  The mineralized zone discovered by the Company on the Tocantinzinho Properties starts on the central 4,000 hectare area and extends eastward beyond the boundary of the central 4,000 hectare area into the Extension Area.  The Company is subject under DNPM regulations related to periodic renewal requirements for its exploration licenses, and certain of those exploration licenses’ initial three year terms expired during fiscal 2009.  The Company has complied with the renewal requirements on the Extension Area and the 4,275 hectare area, and expects to receive extensions of those licenses during the calendar year 2009.  In February 2009, the Company received the renovation on the exploration license in respect of the central 4,000 hectare area.





During fiscal year 2006, the Company became aware that Talon Metals Corp. (“Talon”, formerly BrazMin Corp.) also had applied for exploration licenses to areas of the Tocantinzinho Properties, including all of the area of the mineralized zone discovered by the Company that lies within the Extension Area.  In response, the Company undertook an extensive review of its title position.





At the end of fiscal 2006, as a result of a title review by the Company, it came to the Company’s attention that a long dormant application for a mining license that covered the Extension Area had never been processed by the Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral (“DNPM”) and was still valid.  According to advice from Brazilian counsel, the dormant application carried paramount title to the Extension Area.  The Company, through its subsidiary, Brazauro Recursos Minerais Ltda. (formerly Jaguar Resources do Brasil Ltda.), reached an agreement (“the Extension Area Agreement”) with the holder of such application, Mineração Cachambix Ltda. (“Cachambix”) to acquire its rights to obtain a mining license over the Extension Area, subject to receipt of confirmation from the DNPM of the continued validity of the application for the mining license and the completion of the assignment of the mining license to Brazauro Recursos Minerais Ltda. The Company made a payment of $150,000 (U.S.) to Cachambix in fiscal 2007 upon execution of the Extension Area Agreement.





In September 2006, the Company entered into an agreement (“the Title Consolidation Agreement”) with Talon whereby the Company would acquire the shares of Talon’s subsidiaries with interests in the area of the Tocantinzinho Properties, being Resource Holdings 2004 Inc. and its subsidiary, Empresa Internacional de Mineração do Brasil Ltda., in exchange for 13,150,000 shares of the Company.





On December 5, 2006, the DNPM published at the Brazilian Official Gazette that the application to which the Extension Area Agreement relates had been confirmed as the paramount title. The Company and Cachambix reached an agreement to modify the Extension Area Agreement in February 2007.  Under this modified agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Cachambix by payment of $850,000 (U.S.) plus its agreement to make two future payments of $1,000,000 (U.S.) each to be made to the former shareholders of Cachambix in February 2008 and 2009.  The Company’s obligation to make the future payments was secured by the Cachambix shares. The Company has made all the payments under the agreement.





In February 2007, under the terms of the Title Consolidation Agreement, the Company acquired Resource Holdings 2004 Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Empresa Internacional de Mineração do Brasil Ltda., from Talon in exchange for 13,150,000 common shares of the Company and payment of $50,000 (U.S.).




10




The option agreement provides that the Optionors may be entitled to a sliding scale gross revenues royalty ranging from 2.5% for gold prices below $400 (U.S.) per ounce to 3.5% for gold prices in excess of $500 (U.S.) per ounce from production in respect of the mineral rights relating to the applications subject to the option agreement. Effective December 4, 2009, the Company entered into an amending agreement with the Optionors redefining the NSR royalty.  Under the amending agreement, the parties have agreed that the Company can buy down the royalty from 3.5 per cent to 1.5 per cent in two increments of 1 per cent each. The first payment of $2 million will be triggered by certain events including the exercise, if at all, by Eldorado Gold Corp. under its option/joint-venture agreement with the Company to acquire 60 per cent of the Tocantinzinho project, or failing such exercise, by completion of project financing, the making of a production decision or other specified events. The second payment of $3.5 million will be triggered by the making of a construction decision to proceed with the development of the Tocantinzinho project.  The amended royalty will cover all the ground referred to in the original agreement signed with the royalty holders in 2003, which encompasses the entire Tocantinzinho mineralized deposit.




Under a separate option agreement, the Company held exploration permits for an additional 16,052 hectares adjacent to the western border of the above Tocantinzinho Properties.  The Company agreed to make payments totaling $300,000 (U.S.) over a period of approximately four years to an individual as a finder’s fee related to this 16,000 hectare property. This additional property is not subject to the option agreement and therefore is not subject to the royalty.  The Company received an exploration license from the Brazilian regulatory authority with respect to the additional 16,052 hectares in fiscal year 2005, which expired in October 2007.  The Company has applied for a new exploration license.





In July 2008, the Company reached an agreement with Eldorado and completed a private placement required as part of Eldorado’s earn-in on an option to acquire an initial 60% interest in the Tocantinzinho Properties.  The private placement consisted of the issuance of 8,800,000 units of the Company (the “Units”) to Eldorado at the price of $0.95 per Unit for proceeds of $8,360,000 and is discussed in Note 8 below.





To complete its earn-in of the option to acquire an initial 60% interest in the Company’s Tocantinzinho Properties, Eldorado is required to incur $9.5 million in expenditures on the Tocantinzinho Properties within 24 months or pay the cash equivalent to the Company.  Subject to completing the earn-in, Eldorado will be entitled to exercise the option to acquire an initial 60% in the Tocantinzinho Properties by paying $40 million to the Company. Conditional


upon exercise of the first option, Eldorado will have a second option to acquire a further 10% interest exercisable after a construction decision has been made on the Tocantinzinho Properties by paying an additional $30 million, subject to increase to up to $40 million based on the proven and probable reserves outlined in the feasibility study, and a third option to acquire within two years of the construction decision a further 5% interest (for a total of 75%) by paying a further $20 million.  Eldorado has advised the Company that it has expended in excess of $9.5 million on the Tocantinzinho properties as of September 2009.




On February 25, 2009, the DNPM published in the Brazilian Official Gazette the renewal of the exploration license for the 4,000 hectares related to the central area for an additional period of three years. On May 20, 2009, the DNPM announced the issuing of an extra period of two years for the additional exploration at the 10,000 hectares related to the Extension Area.







Bom Jardim Property





In fiscal 2007, the Company applied for exploration licenses with the DNPM for a total of approximately 38,096 hectares in Pará State located approximately 190 kilometers southwest of the city of Itaituba. The exploration licenses were granted by the DNPM in September 2007 for a period of three years.





On May 9, 2008, the Company and a third party entered into a letter of intent (“the LOI”) whereby the Company could acquire, subject to certain conditions including the execution of a definitive agreement, the Bom Jardim property consisting of approximately 22,700 hectares of concessions and application areas in the Tapajós region of Pará State, Brazil, subject to the back-in rights described below.  The Company was to issue $1,000,000 in common shares for the Bom Jardim Property.




11




The number of Company shares to be issued to the third party was to be calculated using a deemed price per share equal to the greater of the 30 day Volume-Weighed Average Price prior to closing or the Discounted Market Price (as defined in the TSX Venture Exchange Corporate Finance Manual) on the day prior to the date of the LOI (being $0.48).  The parties agreed to negotiate a definitive agreement governing the terms of the transaction in detail, which was anticipated to be executed during 2009 after the satisfaction of certain conditions of both parties, including board and regulatory approvals of the transaction and satisfactory due diligence.  Completion of the acquisition was conditional on the completion of the reorganization by the third party of the corporate structure within which the Bom Jardim Property is presently held.  On closing, the Company would acquire the subsidiary of the third party that holds all of the outstanding shares (or quotas) of the Brazilian “limitada” in which the Bom Jardim Property was to be held in exchange for the Company shares.





The third party was to have the one-time option, two years after closing the sale of the Bom Jardim Property, to back-in to earn a 60% interest in the Company indirectly holding the Bom Jardim Property by spending on the Bom


Jardim Property, over the next three years, an amount equal to two times the expenditures made by the Company on the Bom Jardim properties from closing to the second anniversary of closing.  If the third party elected not to back-in, the third party was to be entitled to a 2% Net Smelter Return Royalty on the Bom Jardim Property.  If the third party acquired the 60% interest, it would have had the further option to increase its interest to 70% by either completing and delivering a bankable feasibility study in respect of the Bom Jardim Property or by spending a further $10 million on the Bom Jardim Property over the succeeding three year period.  Thereafter, the parties were to contribute proportionately to further expenses.  The Company was to have the option to request the third party to lend to the Company sufficient funds to meet the Company’s share of the cost of placing the Bom Jardim Property into production, in which case the third party’s interest will be increased to 75%.





In January 2009, after efforts to reach a definite agreement were not successful, the Company notified the third party that as contemplated on the LOI, both parties’ obligations were terminated.





Piranhas Properties





In July 2008, the Company entered into an option agreement under which it may acquire the mineral rights to the 19,899 hectare Piranhas Property, located in Pará State, Brazil.  The Company has an option to earn 100% of the Piranhas Property, with no residual production royalty obligations, by payment of a total of BR$1,800,000 (Brazilian Reals) over three years.  An initial payment of approximately US$11,000 was made in July 2008. Advance payments in the amount of approximately US$8,800 were made during fiscal 2010. The remaining payments under the option agreement total approximately BR$1,770,000 and are due as follows (all amounts are in Canadian dollars based on the exchange rate as of January 31, 2010):  $31,000, $63,000, $91,000 and $727,000, due in fiscal years 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively.  The Company can terminate the option agreement at any time without further obligation. In November 2009, the Company applied for the exploration licenses to the 19,899 hectare Piranhas Property.





In August 2009, the Company entered into another option agreement under which it may acquire the mineral rights to an additional 7,229 hectare property in the Piranhas area. The property has an exploration license granted by the DNPM in September 2009. The Company has an option to earn a 100% interest in this property, with no residual production royalty obligations, by payment of a total of BR$700,000 over three years. An initial payment of BR$20,000 was made in September 2009. The remaining payments under the option agreement are due as follows (all amounts are in Canadian dollars based on the exchange rate as of January 31, 2010): $23,000, $40,000, and $326,000, due in fiscal years 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. The Company can terminate the option agreement at any time without further obligation.




In December 2009, the Company entered into another option agreement under which it may acquire the mineral rights to an additional 7,404 hectare property in the Piranhas area. The Company has an option to earn a 100% interest in this property, by payment of a total of BR$2,500,000 over three years. An initial payment of approximately $42,000 (BR$75,000) was made in January 2010. The remaining payments under the option agreement are due as follows (all amounts are in Canadian dollars based on the exchange rate as of January 31, 2010): $100,000, $157,000, and $1,128,000, due in fiscal years 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. The vendor will retain a 0.5% net smelter royalty, which the Company can repurchase for BR$3,000,000. The Company can





12





terminate the option agreement at any time without further obligation. In December 2009, the Company applied for the exploration licenses to the 7,404 hectare area in the Piranhas Property.




Agua Branca Property




In August 2009, the Company entered into a non-binding letter of intent with Talon Metals Corp. (“Talon”) to option the Agua Branca property from Talon’s Brazilian subsidiary.  Agua Branca consists of approximately 9,356 hectares of exploration licenses in the Tapajós region of Pará state, Brazil.




The non-binding letter of intent contemplates that, after due diligence by the Company was completed, the parties will enter into a definitive option agreement under which the Company may acquire 100 per cent of the property in consideration for option payments of US$60,000 on signing of the agreement with an additional US$60,000 due upon publication of the exploration licenses by the Brazilian National Department of Mineral Production (“DNPM”) which was expected on or before February 26, 2010 (extended to June 29, 2010), US$130,000 on or before December 31, 2010, and US$1,870,000 in two years from the date of the definitive agreement. To maintain the option, the Company has to spend at least US$500,000 on the property in each of the first two years which includes at least 2,000 meters of core drilling in the first year. In addition, the Company will assume all existing commercial obligations on the property. The vendor will retain a 2% net smelter royalty, which the Company can repurchase for US$2,000,000.




Effective December 10, 2009, the Company and Talon entered into a definitive agreement on the terms described above.







Item 4A.
Unresolved Staff Comments





Not applicable.





Item 5.
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects





A.
Operating Results





For the Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008





The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the information contained in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in “Item 17. Financial Statements.”





Mineral Properties and Deferred Expenditures





The Company is engaged in the business of exploring for and, if warranted, developing mineral properties and is concentrating its current acquisition and exploration efforts on those properties which the Company believes have large scale gold potential.  The Company has been focusing on its Properties located in the Tapajós Gold District of Brazil’s northerly Pará State.





The Company’s current Properties are in the exploration stage and have not been proven to be commercially developable to date.  The Company’s existing Properties are gold prospects in Brazil which were acquired during fiscal years 2004 through 2010.  The Company capitalizes expenditures associated with the direct acquisition, evaluation and exploration of mineral properties.  When an area is disproved or abandoned, the acquisition costs and related deferred expenditures are written-off.  The net capitalized cost of each mineral property is periodically compared to management’s estimation of the net realizable value and a write-down is recorded if the net realizable value is less than the cumulative net capitalized costs.





The Company’s mineral properties and deferred expenditures increased to $30,138,894 at January 31, 2010 from $28,809,952 at January 31, 2009 as a result of acquisition costs totaling $179,139 and exploration costs totaling





13





$1,149,803 related to the activities on the Company’s Brazilian properties.  As of January 31, 2010, the capitalized costs related to the Company’s primary exploration target, the Tocantinzinho Properties, totaled $28,225,391.  The capitalized costs related to the Company’s properties Bom Jardim, Piranhas and Agua Branca, totaled approximately $1,162,000; $493,000 and $216,000; respectively, as of January 31, 2010.  The capitalized costs related to the Company’s remaining property Andorinhas, totaled approximately $42,000 as of January 31, 2010.





The Company’s mineral properties and deferred expenditures increased to $28,809,952 at January 31, 2009 from $25,872,047 at January 31, 2008 as a result of acquisition costs totaling $231,571 and exploration costs totaling $2,745,256 related to the activities on the Company’s Brazilian properties, less the write-off of the exploration costs related to the Crepori Property of $20,922.  As of January 31, 2009, the capitalized costs related to the Company’s primary exploration target, the Tocantinzinho Properties, totaled $28,111,113.  The capitalized costs related to the Company’s property, the   Bom Jardim Property, totaled approximately $594,000 as of January 31, 2009.  The capitalized costs related to the Company’s remaining two properties, the Piranha and Andorinhas Properties, totaled approximately $105,000 as of January 31, 2009.





In July 2008, the Company reached an agreement with Eldorado and completed a private placement required as part of Eldorado’s earn-in on an option to acquire an initial 60% interest in the Tocantinzinho Properties.  The private placement consisted of the issuance of 8,800,000 units of the Company (the “Units”) to Eldorado at the price of $0.95 per Unit for proceeds of $8,360,000.





To complete its earn-in of the option to acquire an initial 60% interest in the Company’s Tocantinzinho Properties, Eldorado is required to incur $9.5 million in expenditures on the Tocantinzinho Properties within 24 months or pay the cash equivalent to the Company.  Subject to completing the earn-in Eldorado will be entitled to exercise the option to acquire an initial 60% in the Project by paying $40 million dollars to the Company.  Conditional upon exercise of the first option, Eldorado will have a second option to acquire a further 10% interest exercisable after a construction decision has been made on the Tocantinzinho Properties by paying an additional $30 million dollars, subject to increase to up to $40 million dollars based on the proven and probable reserves outlined in the feasibility study, and a third option to acquire within two years of the construction decision a further 5% interest (for a total of 75%) by paying a further $20 million dollars.





In February 2007, the Company completed its acquisition of the mineral rights to the Extension Area within the Tocantinzinho Property as a result of the acquisition of the following three corporations.  The Company acquired Resource Holdings 2004 Inc. (“RH 2004”, a British Virgin Islands corporation), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Empresa Internacional de Mineração do Brasil Ltda. (“EIMB”, a Brazil corporation), in exchange for the issuance of 13,150,000 common shares of the Company and payment of $50,000 (U.S.) to a third party.  Additionally, the Company acquired Mineração Cachambix Ltda. (“Cachambix”, a Brazil corporation) from third parties by payment of $850,000 (U.S.) and its agreement to make two future payments of $1,000,000 (U.S.) each, which were paid on the due dates in February 2008 and 2009.





During fiscal 2008 the Company made the final option payment of $150,000 (U.S.) and 700,000 common shares of the Company due under the Option Agreement to acquire the Tocantinzinho Properties dated August 2003.  Additionally, in fiscal 2008 the Company incurred acquisition costs totaling approximately $1,290,000 (U.S.) related to the Tocantinzinho Properties, which primarily represent payments for mineral rights under the Underlying Agreements discussed in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.





In July 2008, the Company entered into an option agreement under which it may acquire the mineral rights to the 20,688 hectare Piranha Property, located in Pará State.  The Company has an option to earn 100% of the Piranha Property, with no residual production royalty obligations, by payment of a total of $1,800,000 (Brazilian Reals) over three years.





In August 2009 the Company entered into another option agreement under which it may acquire the mineral rights to an additional 7,229 hectare property in the Piranhas area. The Company has an option to earn a 100% interest in this property, with no residual production royalty obligations, by payment of a total of BR$ 700,000 over three years. The Company can terminate the option agreement at any time without further obligation.




14





In December 2009, the Company entered into an option agreement under which it may acquire the mineral rights to an additional 7,404 hectare property in the Piranhas area. The Company has an option to earn a 100% interest in this property, by payment of a total of BR$ 2,500,000 over three years. The vendor will retain a 0.5% net smelter royalty which the Company can repurchase for BR$ 3,000,000. The Company can terminate the option agreement at any time without further obligation.




In August 2009 the Company entered into a non-binding letter of intent with Talon Metals Corp. to option the Agua Branca property from Talon’s Brazilian subsidiary.  Agua Branca consists of approximately 9,356 hectares of exploration licenses in the Tapajós region of Pará state, Brazil. Effective December 10, 2009, after due diligence by the Company was completed, the parties entered into a definitive agreement under which the Company may acquire 100 per cent of the property in consideration for option payments of US$60,000 on signing of the agreement with an additional US$60,000 due upon publication of the exploration licenses by the Brazilian National Department of Mineral Production (“DNPM”) which was expected during the first quarter of 2010, US$130,000 on or before December 31, 2010, and US$1,870,000 two years from the date of the definitive agreement. In addition, and to maintain the option, the Company will expend at least US$500,000 on the property in each of the first two years which will include at least 2,000 meters of core drilling in the first year and will assume existing commercial obligations on the property. The vendor will retain a 2% net smelter royalty which the Company can repurchase for US$2,000,000.




During fiscal 2008, the Company conducted exploration activities at the Crepori Property, and based upon the results of the exploration results elected to terminate the option agreement in April 2008.  Accordingly, the capitalized acquisition and exploration costs totaling $576,694 and $ 20,922 were written off in fiscal 2008 and 2009, respectively, and the Company has no further obligations under the option agreement.




On May 9, 2008, the Company and Gold Fields Holdings Company BVI Ltd. (“Gold Fields”) entered into a letter of intent (“the LOI”) whereby the Company was to acquire, subject to certain conditions including the execution of a definitive agreement, the Bom Jardim property consisting of approximately 22,700 hectares of concessions and application areas in the Tapajós region of Pará State, Brazil. In January 2009, after efforts to reach a definite agreement were not successful, the Company notified Gold Fields that as contemplated in the LOI, both parties’ obligations were terminated.




The Company’s mineral properties and deferred expenditures increased to $25,872,047 at January 31, 2008 from $6,368,126 at January 31, 2007 as a result of acquisition costs totaling $17,993,741 and exploration costs totaling $2,194,762 related to the activities on the Company’s Brazilian properties, less the write-off of the exploration costs related to the Sucuri and Crepori Properties of $684,582.  As of January 31, 2008, the capitalized costs related to the Company’s primary exploration target, the Tocantinzinho Properties, totaled $25,835,276.  The capitalized costs related to the Company’s remaining property, the   Bom Jardim Property, totaled approximately $36,000 as of January 31, 2008.





In fiscal 2007, the Company reviewed its exploration results related to the Sucuri property and determined that exploration activities would be suspended during fiscal 2008.  Accordingly, the capitalized exploration costs totaling approximately $708,000 were written off in fiscal 2007.  In fiscal 2008, after additional review of the viability of the property, the Company advised the optionor that the Company would release the Sucuri Property and no further payments would be made under the agreement.  The accumulated acquisition and exploration costs totaling $107,888 were written off in fiscal 2008.





Since 2004, 159 drill holes have been completed on the Tocantinzinho project by the Company and Eldorado. In addition, a resource of over 2.28 million gold ounces has been established and two Preliminary Economic Assessments (PEA) have been completed, both finding the project to be commercially viable.





In December 2006, the Company received a NI 43-101 qualified estimate of the gold resource at the Tocantinzinho Properties, and another two, in August 2007 and December 2007.  Additionally, the Company commissioned an independent, preliminary scoping study at the Tocantinzinho Properties, and results from the study were released in the third fiscal quarter of 2008.  In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company commissioned and received an





15





additional preliminary scoping study at the Tocantinzinho Properties, and results from that study were released in December 2007.





During fiscal 2009 the Company completed an 8,500 meter core drilling campaign on the Tocantinzinho Property that was designed to upgrade inferred resources to the indicated category and to probe deeper into the mineralized zone with a view to increasing the total resources down to the level of 300 meters below surface.  Results of the 26 drill holes completed in the fiscal 2009 drilling campaign were released in October, 2008.





In January 2010 the Company announced the results of an updated PEA that confirms the economic viability and technical aspects of the Company’s 100%-owned Tocantinzinho property.The updated PEA was conducted by NCL Brasil Ltda. and builds on the assessment announced by the Company in December 2007.  It includes a detailed mine plan, enhanced engineering studies and committed budget proposals from suppliers for key elements of the mine development, including the provision of power to the site.





Income from Operations





The Company has not received any revenues from mining operations since inception.  During the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 the Company’s revenues were comprised primarily of interest income on proceeds received from prior financings.


General and administrative expenses totaled approximately $4,697,000 during fiscal 2010 as compared to approximately $3,727,000 during fiscal 2009, representing a net increase of approximately $970,000 or 26%. Included in general and administrative expenses during fiscal 2010 and 2009 were approximately $1,688,000 and $451,000; respectively, of stock compensation expense recorded using the fair value method. The variation in the stock compensation expense from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010 is due to the increase in the number of options granted during 2010.  A total of 5,905,000 and 500,000 options were granted in fiscal 2010 and 2009; respectively. A total of 4,170,892 and 584,474 options were forfeited in fiscal 2010 and 2009; respectively.  The Company’s common stock options vest mainly over a period of 18 months, with 25% of the common stock options vesting upon the date of issuance and 12.5% of the common stock options vesting each quarter thereafter.





After adjusting for the effects of stock compensation expense on general and administrative expenses, the remaining general and administrative expenses totaled approximately $3,009,000 and $3,275,000 for the fiscal years of 2010 and 2009, respectively, representing a decrease of $267,000 or 8%. The decrease is due primarily to the following: (i) Shareholders relations expense decreased by approximately $304,000 due to the end of a promotional campaign conducted during fiscal 2009; (ii) Professional fees were higher in 2009 by approximately $145,000 as compared to 2010 due to execution of Eldorado and Bom Jardim transactions  in fiscal 2009, and (iii) Salaries increased by  approximately $187,000 in 2010 due to hiring of a new President of  the Company.





General and administrative expenses totaled approximately $3,727,000 during fiscal 2009 as compared to approximately $2,912,000 during fiscal 2008, representing an increase of approximately $815,000 or 28%. The increase is due primarily to the following: (i) the Company incurred consulting fees during fiscal 2009 totaling approximately $156,000 related to the Eldorado transaction; (ii) directors’ fees totaling $93,500 were awarded in fiscal 2009 and no directors’ fees were awarded during the similar period in 2008; (iii) an increase in professional fees totaling approximately $302,000 related to the increased activity in the Company during fiscal 2009, primarily legal fees related to the Eldorado transaction and the proposed  Bom Jardim transaction and geology consulting fees incurred in evaluating prospective property acquisitions in Brazil; and (iv) a promotional campaign to investors conducted during fiscal 2009 costing approximately $250,000.





The Company anticipates that general and administrative expenses during fiscal 2011 will increase from the level experienced in fiscal 2010 as the Company incurs additional consulting and exploration expenditures related to the Brazilian Properties.




16





Differences Between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles





At the present stage of the Company’s business development, there are no significant differences between Canadian and United States generally accepted accounting principles that impact the Consolidated Balance Sheets, the Consolidated Statements of Operations, the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows except for the capitalization of mineral properties and deferred expenditures  as discussed in Note 21 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.





Fluctuations in Foreign Currency Exchange Rates.





The Company raises its equity in Canadian dollars and its exploration expenditures are generally denominated in Brazilian Reales and United States dollars.  As a result, the Company’s expenditures are subject to foreign currency fluctuations.  Foreign currency fluctuations may materially and adversely increase the Company’s operating expenditures and reduce the amount exploration activities that the Company is able to complete with its current capital. The Company does not engage in any hedging or other transactions to protect itself against such currency fluctuations.





Impact of Inflation.





As the Company is not anticipating recording sales and revenues from operations in the short term, a discussion of the effect of inflation and changing prices on its operations is not relevant.





B.
Financial Condition; Liquidity and Capital Resources.





As of January 31, 2010, the Company had working capital of $4,892,539 as compared to working capital of $4,586,023 at January 31, 2009.  At January 31, 2010, the Company had current assets of $5,747,779, including $5,704,919 in cash and cash equivalents and $42,860 in other current assets compared to total current liabilities of $855,240.





In November 2009, the Company closed a private placement of 7,659,699 units at $0.65 per unit for gross proceeds of $4,978,804.  The Company paid brokerage cash commission on the placement of $308,867 plus additional share issuance costs totaling $113,315.  Each unit consists of one common share and one half of one share purchase warrant.  Each of the 3,829,849 warrants would entitle the holder to purchase one additional share of the Company at $1.00 until May 3, 2011. Additionally, brokerage agents received 475,180 agent’s warrants, entitling the holder to purchase one additional unit of the Company at $0.65 until May 3, 2011; each unit consists of one common share and one half of one share purchase warrant (the “underlying warrant”), entitling the holder to purchase one additional common share of the Company at $1.00 until May 3, 2011.





In July 2008, the Company closed a private placement with Eldorado Gold Corporation (“Eldorado”) by the issuance of 8,800,000 units of the Company (the “Units”) at the price of $0.95 per Unit for gross proceeds of $8,360,000.  The Company paid stock issuance costs totaling $38,200.  Each Unit consists of one common share and one-half of one non-transferable share purchase warrant.  Each full warrant would entitle the holder to acquire one additional share at a price of $1.30 per share until January 24, 2010. In the first quarter of 2009, the Company received approval from the TSX Venture Exchange to amend the 4,400,000 warrants to extend the expiry date to January 24, 2011 and to reduce the exercise price to $1.00. The shares, warrants and any shares issued upon exercise of the warrants are subject to a four month hold period during which the securities may not be traded except as permitted by the Securities Act and the Rules made there under and the TSX Venture Exchange.





To complete its earn-in of the option to acquire an initial 60% interest in the Company’s Tocantinzinho Properties, Eldorado is required to incur $9.5 million in expenditures on the Tocantinzinho Properties within 24 months or pay the cash equivalent to the Company. Eldorado has advised the Company that it has expended in excess of $9.5 million on the Tocantinzinho properties as of September 2009. Subject to completing the earn-in Eldorado will be entitled to exercise the option to acquire an initial 60% in the Project by paying $40 million dollars to the Company.  Conditional upon exercise of the first option, Eldorado will have a second option to acquire a further 10% interest exercisable after a construction decision has been made on the Tocantinzinho Properties by paying an additional $30





17





million dollars, subject to increase to up to $40 million dollars based on the proven and probable reserves outlined in the feasibility study, and a third option to acquire within two years of the construction decision a further 5% interest (for a total of 75%) by paying a further $20 million dollars.





In March 2007 the Company closed a private placement of 9,253,333 units at $0.90 per unit for gross proceeds of $8,328,000.  The Company paid a brokerage commission on the placement of $372,960, plus additional share issuance costs totalling $48,610.  Each unit consisted of one common share and one half of one share purchase warrant.  Each whole warrant would entitle the holder to purchase one additional share of the Company at $1.60 for one year.  Subsequent to January 31, 2008, the Company received approval from the TSX Venture Exchange to amend the warrants to extend the expiry date to March 22, 2009 and to reduce the exercise price to $1.25 per share. In the first quarter of 2009, the Company received approval from the TSX Venture Exchange to amend the 4,626,666 warrants to extend the expiry date to March 22, 2010 and to reduce the exercise price to $1.00. The 4,626,666 warrants expired unexercised.





During fiscal 2010 and 2009 no stock options were exercised. During fiscal 2008 the Company received cash proceeds of $13,500 representing the exercise of 75,000 stock options, by officers, directors, employees and consultants at exercise prices from $0.10.





In February 2007, the Company completed its acquisition of the mineral rights to the Extension Area within the Tocantinzinho Property as a result of the acquisition of the following three corporations.  The Company acquired Resource Holdings 2004 Inc. (“RH 2004”, a British Virgin Islands corporation), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Empresa Internacional de Mineração do Brasil Ltda. (“EIMB”, a Brazil corporation), in exchange for the issuance of 13,150,000 common shares of the Company and payment of $50,000 (U.S.) to a third party.  Additionally, the Company acquired Mineração Cachambix Ltda. (“Cachambix”, a Brazil corporation) from third parties by payment of $850,000 (U.S.) and its agreement to make two future payments of $1,000,000 (U.S.) each, which were due and paid in February 2008 and 2009.





All financings described herein were private placements and were made pursuant to the private placement laws of Canada and pursuant to the exemptions provided by Section 4(2) and Regulation S under the United States Securities Act of 1933.





The Company, except for the Tocantinzinho Property, has no other properties that have proven to be commercially developable, and has no significant revenues from mining operations.  The rights and interests in the Tocantinzinho, Piranhas, Agua Branca and Bom Jardim Properties in Brazil constitute the Company’s current mineral holdings.  While the Company believes it has sufficient working capital as of this date to meet its commitments during 2010, the Company cannot estimate with any degree of certainty either the time or the amount of funds that will be required to acquire and conduct additional exploration activities on new prospects.  Certain of the Company’s planned expenditures are discretionary and may be increased or decreased based upon funds available to the Company.  The Company may seek additional equity financing during fiscal 2011, including the potential exercise of outstanding options and warrants.  The inability of the Company to raise further equity financing could adversely affect the Company’s business plan, including its ability to acquire additional properties and perform exploration activities on existing properties.  If additional equity is not available, the Company may seek exploration partners to assist in funding acquisition or exploration efforts.  Historically, the Company has been able to successfully raise capital as required for its business needs; however, no assurances are made by the Company that it can continue to raise debt or equity capital for a number of reasons including its history of losses and property writedowns, the fluctuation in the price of its common stock, the number of shares outstanding and the Company’s limited and speculative asset base of exploration properties and prospects.





C.
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses





The Company is a mineral exploration company with no producing properties, so the information required by this item is not applicable.




18





D.
Trend Information





The cyclical nature of the prices of metals, particularly the price of gold, is reasonably likely to have an effect on the Company’s liquidity and capital resources.  If the price of gold or the worldwide demand for gold decreases, there would likely be an adverse effect on the Company’s ability to raise additional funding and attract exploration partners for its Properties.





E.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.





As of June 30, 2010, the Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.





F.
Contractual Obligations





As of January 31, 2010, the Company’s operating lease obligations were approximately as follows:





Payments due by periodContractual

obligations

Total


Less

than

1 year


1-3

Years


3-5

years


More

than

5 yearsOperating Lease Obligations

$
206,545


$
106,545


$
100,000


$
-


$
-





Additionally, the Company has payments totaling BR$4,875,000 required to maintain its interest in the Piranhas Properties.  While these payments are not fixed obligations since the Company can abandon the Properties at any time without penalty or further payments, these payments are required in order to maintain the Company’s interest.  The timing of all such payments is as follows (all amounts are approximate and in Canadian dollars based on the exchange rate as of January 31, 2010):  $154,000, $260,000, $1,545,000 and $727,000, due in fiscal years 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively.




Additionally, the Company has payments totaling US$2,060,000 required to maintain its interest in the Agua Branca Property.  The amount of US$60,000 is due upon publication of the exploration licenses by the Brazilian National Department of Mineral Production (“DNPM”), US$130,000 on or before December 31, 2010, and US$1,870,000 in two years from the date of the definitive agreement. To maintain the option, the Company has to spend at least US$500,000 on the property in each of the first two years which includes at least 2,000 meters of core drilling in the first year. In addition, the Company will assume all existing commercial obligations on the property. The vendor will retain a 2% net smelter royalty, which the Company can repurchase for US$2,000,000.







G.  Safe Harbor





Certain statements in this Form 20-F under “Item 3. Risk Factors”, “Item 4. Properties”, “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”, “Item 8. Financial Information” and “Item 10. Additional Information” constitutes “forward-looking statements”.  These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the following: general economic and business conditions; competition; success of operating initiatives; the success (or lack thereof) with respect to the Company’s exploration and development operations on its properties; the Company’s ability to raise capital and the terms thereof; the acquisition of additional mineral properties; changes in business strategy or development plans; exploration and other property writedowns; the continuity, experience and quality of the Company’s management; changes in or failure to comply with government regulations or the lack of government authorization to continue certain projects; the outcome of litigation matters, and other factors referenced in this Form 20-F. In addition, the Company entered into an agreement with Eldorado





19





pursuant to which, subject to certain conditions, Eldorado will acquire all the outstanding shares of the Company.   Forward-looking statements regarding the transaction are subject to assumptions and risks as set out in the Company’s Management Information Circular dated June 10, 2010. The use in this Form 20-F of such words as “believes”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements.  The success of the Company is dependent on the efforts of the Company, its employees and many other factors including, primarily, its ability to raise additional capital and establishing the economic viability of its exploration Properties.





Item 6.
Directors, Senior Management and Employees





A.
Directors and senior management





The directors and executive officers of the Company, their ages and term of continuous service are as follows:





Name
Age
Position with

Registrant
Served As a Directorand/ or Officer SincePatrick L. Glazier
52
Director
July 8, 1998Brian C. Irwin
70
Director, CFO
October 3, 1995Mark E. Jones, III
70
Director, Chairman & CEO
March 12, 1986Leendert G. Krol
70
Director
March 6, 2003Dr. Roger David Morton
74
Director
June 14, 1993Gregory Chorny
60
Director
August 8, 2008Elton L. S. Pereira
49
Vice President - Exploration
April 30, 2007John Segner
52
Director
June  12, 2009James Komadina
53
Director, President, COO
October 1, 2009





Patrick L. Glazier.Mr. Glazier has served as the President of East Fraser Fiber Co. Ltd. based in Prince George, British Columbia for the past six years.





Brian C. Irwin.Mr. Irwin’s principal occupation was the practice of law as a partner of DuMoulin Black in Vancouver, British Columbia, until his retirement in June 2005. On May 29, 2008, Mr. Irwin was appointed the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.





Mark E. Jones, III.  Mr. Jones has served as Chairman of the Company from 1986 to the present.  In his capacity as Chairman of the Board of Directors, Mr. Jones is the chief executive officer of the Company.  Additionally, Mr. Jones served as the President of the Company from 1986 to June 1990, from July 2001 to March 2003, and from May 2005 until October 2009.  Mr. Jones has served as a Director of Crown Resources Corporation (“Crown”) from 1987 to 2006, when Crown was sold to Kinross Gold Corp.  Mr. Jones is also a director of Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corporation, where he has served since 1992 and is currently Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors.





Leendert G. Krol.Until his retirement in April 2001, Mr. Krol had spent 13 years with Newmont Mining Corporation including the last 10 years, successively, as Director of Foreign Operation, Vice President Exploration and Vice President International Exploration.  Mr. Krol served as the Company’s president from March 2003 until May 2005.  Mr. Krol also serves as a Director of Romarco Minerals Inc and StrataGold Corporation.





Dr. Roger David Morton.  Dr. Morton has been Professor Emeritus in Geology with the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Alberta since 1996. He is a member of the Board of Directors of Diamond Hawk Mining Corporation and Sola Resource Corporation.  Dr. Morton obtained his B.Sc. (Hons. 1st class) in Geology and his Ph.D. in Geology from the University of Nottingham, England.




20




Gregory Chorny.Mr. Chorny, a retired barrister, has been involved in finance in the junior resources sector as an independent venture capitalist for the past sixteen years.





Mr. Elton L. S. Pereira. Mr. Pereira began serving as the Company’s Chief Vice President - Exploration on April 30, 2007. Prior to his appointment as Vice President of Exploration of the Company, Mr. Pereira served as the Company’s Manager of Exploration for two years.  Mr. Pereira has over twenty years of experience in mineral exploration in Brazil, mainly with the Rio Tinto Group.  Mr. Pereira is a graduate geologist of Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos of Rio Grande do Sul State and has a M.Sc degree from Universidade Federal do Ouro Preto of Minas Gerais State.





John Segner. Mr. Segner has been a private investor for the last 2 years. Mr. Segner served as a Managing Director and Global Partner of Invesco PLC from 1997 to 2009.





James J. Komadina.Mr. Komadina has a distinguished mining career. Prior to joining Brazauro he served as president and chief executive officer of Minera SA, a private natural resource investment firm and majority shareholder of Orvana Minerals (TSX:ORV). Previously, he was senior vice president of Gold Fields Exploration Inc., responsible for all non-South African global development projects.  Prior to that, he served as president and chief executive officer, North America, for AngloGold Limited, as well as holding responsible positions with Newmont Gold Company.





No director or officer of the Company has any family relationship with any other officer or director of the Company.  The Company has no arrangement or understanding with major shareholders, customers, suppliers or others, pursuant to which any person referred to above was selected as a director.





B.
Compensation





Officers





During the financial year ended January 31, 2010, Brazauro had four (4) Named Executive Officers: Mark E. Jones III, CEO, Jim Komadina, President and COO, Brian C. Irwin, CFO and Secretary, and Elton L.S. Pereira, Vice President Exploration. The Company has no long-term incentive plans.  However stock options are awarded from time-to-time at the discretion of the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee.  The following tables set forth all annual and long-term compensation for services in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries for the last full financial years, including information regarding stock option awards made under the Company’s Stock Option Plan, , in respect of the CEO, the CFO, the COO and the Vice President Exploration.





Summary Compensation Table





Annual Compensation


Long Term CompensationAwards


PayoutsName

and

Principal

Position

Salary

US ($)


Bonus

US ($)


Other Annual

Compensation

(2)

US ($)


Securities Under Options

Granted

(#)


Restricted

Shares

($)


LTIP

Payouts

($)


All other

Compensation (3)

US ($)Mark E. Jones, III,

Chairman, President, CEO & Director


200,000



10,000



29,724



850,000



-



-



7,800Brian C. Irwin,

CFO & Director (1)


135,144



5,328



25,749



400,000



-



-



-James J. Komadina

President & COO (4)


116,667



2,500



19,272



1,500,000



-



-



-Elton L. S. Pereira

VP Exploration


184,892



10,547



-



400,000



-



-



-





21




(1) Mr. Irwin provides consulting services to the Company under month-to-month contracts and a monthly fee of Can$10,000.


(2) Such other compensation includes Director’s fees paid for each Director’s meeting or committee meeting attended


(3) Car allowance.


(4) Mr. Komadina received a signing bonus of US$50,000 (included in Salary)





Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) Awards


The Company does not have a LTIP, pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation intended to serve as an incentive for performance over a period greater than one financial year (whereby performance is measured by reference to financial performance or the price of the Company’s securities) was paid to the officers during the most recently completed financial year.





Option/Stock Appreciation Rights (“SAR”) Grants During the Most Recently Completed Financial Year


The following table sets forth stock options granted under the Company’s stock option plan or otherwise during the most recently completed financial year to each of the officers.




Option Grants During the Most Recently Completed Fiscal Year





Individual GrantsName
Securities

Under Options

Granted

(#)
% of Total Options

Granted to

Employees in

Fiscal Year
(4)

Exercise or

Base Price

($/Security)
Expiration DateMark E. Jones, III
350,000 (1)

500,000 (2)
14%
0.55

0.75
4/24/2014

12/15/2014Brian C. Irwin
250,000 (1)

150,000 (2)
7%
0.55

0.75
4/24/2014

12/15/2014James J. Komadina
500,000 (1)

1,000,000 (3)
25%
0.70

0.59
10/1/2014

11/25/2014Elton L. S. Pereira
250,000 (1)

150,000 (2)
7%
0.55

0.75
4/24/2014

12/15/2014





(1)
The options are subject to vesting requirements (25% on the date of grant and 12.5% on each quarter end thereafter).


(2)
Options fully vested on the date of issue.


(3)
The options are subject to vesting requirements (50% on January 1, 2010 and 50% on April 1, 2010).


(4)
The exercise price of stock options is determined by the Board of Directors but shall in no event be less than the trading price of the common shares of the Corporation on the TSX Venture Exchange (“the Exchange”) at the time of the grant of the option.





The following table sets forth details of all exercises of stock options during the most recently completed financial year by each of the Named Executive Officer of the Corporation, and as of January 31, 2010, the number of unexercised options held by the Named Executive Officers, and the financial year-end value of unexercised in-the-money options on an aggregated basis.




22




Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year





Name
Securities

Acquired

on Exercise



(#)
Aggregate

Value

Realized



($)
Unexercised

Options

at Fiscal

Year-End

(#)

Exercisable/

Unexercisable
Value of Unexercised

In-the-Money

Options

at Fiscal Year-End

($)

Exercisable/

UnexercisableMark E. Jones, III
Nil
Nil
1,374,240 – Exercisable

131,250 – Unexercisable
120,313 – Exercisable

72,188 – UnexercisableBrian C. Irwin
Nil
Nil
713,123 – Exercisable

93,750 – Unexercisable
195,938 – Exercisable

51,563 – UnexercisableJames J. Komadina
Nil
Nil
687,500 – Exercisable

812,500 – Unexercisable
295,000 – Exercisable

295,000 – UnexercisableElton L. S. Pereira
Nil
Nil
1,106,250 – Exercisable

93,750 – Unexercisable
481,938 – Exercisable

51,563 – Unexercisable





Directors





The Company currently has six Directors, three of which Mark E. Jones III, James J. Komadina and Brian C. Irwin are also Named Executive Officers.  For a description of the compensation paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers who also act as Directors, see “Summary Compensation Table” above.





The Company compensates all Directors for their services in their capacity as Directors as follows: Directors are paid an annual fee of Can$15,000 and Can$1,000 for each Directors meeting or committee meeting they attend, with the Chairman receiving Can$1,500.





The Company maintains no pension, profit sharing, retirement or other plan providing benefits to its Directors.





The following table sets forth all amounts of compensation paid or granted to the Company’s Directors, other than Named Executive Officers, for the most recently completed financial year:





Summary Compensation Table





Annual Compensation


Long Term CompensationAwards


PayoutsName

and

Principal

Position

Salary

US ($)


Bonus

US ($)


Other Annual

Compensation

(2)

US ($)


Securities Under Options

Granted

(#)


Restricted

Shares

($)


LTIP

Payouts

($)


All other

Compensation

US ($)Leendert G. Krol ,

Director (1)


96,000



4,800



22,804



750,000



-



-



-Dr. Roger David Morton,Director


-



-



22,804



350,000



-



-



-Gregory Chorny,

Director


-



-



25,654



250,000



-



-



-Patrick L. Glazier,

Director


-



-



23,754



400,000



-



-



-John Segner, Director


-



-



48,869



150,000



-



-



-





23





(1) Mr. Krol provides consulting services to the Company under month-to-month contracts and a monthly fee of US$8,000.


(2) Such other compensation includes Director’s fees paid for each Director’s meeting or committee meeting attended.





Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) Awards


The Company does not have a LTIP, pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation intended to serve as an incentive for performance over a period greater than one financial year (whereby performance is measured by reference to financial performance or the price of the Company’s securities) was paid to the Directors during the most recently completed financial year.





Option/Stock Appreciation Rights (“SAR”) Grants During the Most Recently Completed Financial Year


The following table sets forth stock options granted under the Company’s stock option plan or otherwise during the most recently completed financial year to each of the Directors.







Option Grants During the Most Recently Completed Fiscal Year





Individual GrantsName
Securities

Under Options

Granted

(#)
% of Total Options

Granted to

Directors in

Fiscal Year
(3)

Exercise or

Base Price

($/Security)
Expiration DateLeendert G. Krol
350,000 (1)

400,000 (2)
13%
0.55

0.75
4/24/2014

12/15/2014Dr. Roger David Morton
150,000 (1)

200,000 (2)
6%
0.55

0.75
4/24/2014

12/15/2014Gregory Chorny
150,000 (1)

100,000 (2)
4%
0.55

0.75
4/24/2014

12/15/2014Patrick L. Glazier
150,000 (1)

250,000 (2)
7%
0.55

0.75
4/24/2014

12/15/2014John Segner
150,000 (2)
3%
0.75
12/15/2014





(1)
The options are subject to vesting requirements (25% on the date of grant and 12.5% on each quarter end thereafter).


(2)
Options fully vested on the date of issue.


(3)
The exercise price of stock options is determined by the Board of Directors but shall in no event be less than the trading price of the common shares of the Corporation on the TSX Venture Exchange (“the Exchange”) at the time of the grant of the option.





The following table sets forth details of all exercises of stock options during the most recently completed financial year by each of the Directors of the Company, and as of January 31, 2010, the number of unexercised options held by the Directors, and the financial year-end value of unexercised in-the-money options on an aggregated basis.




24





Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year





Name
Securities

Acquired

on Exercise



(#)
Aggregate

Value

Realized



($)
Unexercised

Options

at Fiscal

Year-End

(#)

Exercisable/

Unexercisable
Value of Unexercised

In-the-Money

Options

at Fiscal Year-End

($)

Exercisable/

UnexercisableLeendert G. Krol
Nil
Nil
1,442,965 – Exercisable

131,250 – Unexercisable
230,313 – Exercisable

72,188 – UnexercisableDr. Roger David Morton
Nil
Nil
558,848 – Exercisable

56,250 – Unexercisable
106,563 – Exercisable

30,938 – UnexercisableGregory Chorny
Nil
Nil
368,750 – Exercisable

81,250 – Unexercisable
139,063 – Exercisable

43,438 – UnexercisablePatrick L. Glazier
Nil
Nil
792,396 – Exercisable

56,250 – Unexercisable
161,563 – Exercisable

30,938 – UnexercisableJohn Segner
Nil
Nil
150,000 – Exercisable

Nil – Unexercisable
Nil – Exercisable

Nil – Unexercisable








The Company has no arrangements, standard or otherwise, pursuant to which directors are compensated by the Company or its subsidiaries for their services in their capacity as directors during the most recently completed fiscal year or subsequently, other than the payments disclosed above.





C.
Board Practices





All directors are elected annually by the shareholders and hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders.  There are no directors’ service contracts with the Company that provide for benefits for the directors upon termination of service.





Messrs. Chorny, Glazier and Morton are members of the Company’s Audit Committee, all of whom are “independent directors” under the rules of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  Mr. Chorny serves as the Audit Committee’s financial expert.





The primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its financial oversight responsibilities by reviewing the financial reports and other financial information provided by the Company to regulatory authorities and shareholders, the Company’s systems of internal controls regarding finance and accounting and the Company’s auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes.  Consistent with this function, the Audit Committee will encourage continuous improvement of, and should foster adherence to, the Company’s policies, procedures and practices at all levels.  The Audit Committee’s primary duties and responsibilities are to:




·
Serve as an independent and objective party to monitor the Company’s financial reporting and internal control system and review the Company’s financial statements.




·
Review and appraise the performance of the Company’s external auditors.




·
Provide an open avenue of communication among the Company’s auditors, financial and senior management and the Board of Directors.




Messrs. Morton, Chorny and Irwin serve as members of the Company’s Compensation Committee.  The Compensation Committee has responsibility for determining compensation for the directors and senior management.  To determine compensation payable, the Compensation Committee reviews compensation paid for directors and





25





CEOs of companies of similar size and stage of development in the mineral exploration industry and determines an appropriate compensation reflecting the need to provide incentive and compensation for the time and effort expended by the directors and senior management while taking into account the financial and other resources of the Company.  In setting the compensation, the Compensation Committee annually reviews the performance of the CEO in light of the Company’s objectives and considers other factors that may have impacted the success of the Company in achieving its objectives.





D.
Employees





The Company’s principal office is located in Houston, TX.  The Company also maintains administrative offices in Belem, Brazil and field offices in Itaituba, Brazil.  The Company had 31, 23, and 26 full-time employees at January 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively; however, the Company retains consultants, independent contractors and part-time employees on an as-needed basis in connection with its exploration and development activities.  For each of the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, six of the Company’s full-time employees were based in the United States and the remaining employees were based in Belem and Itaituba, Brazil.





E.
Share Ownership





The following table sets forth, as of June 10, 2010, the number of the Company’s common shares beneficially owned by the directors and members of senior management of the Company, individually, and as a group, and the percentage of ownership of the outstanding common shares represented by such shares.





The shareholders listed below possess sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown.





Name of Beneficial Owner
Number
of Shares
Percent of ClassPatrick L. Glazier (2)
2,027,317 (1)
2.0 %Brian C. Irwin
756,373 (1)
*Mark E. Jones, III
3,177,790 (1)
3.1 %Leendert G. Krol
1,419,115 (1)
1.4%Dr. Roger David Morton
575,098 (1)
*Gregory Chorny (3)
1,601,922 (1)
1.6%Elton L. S. Pereira
1,100,000 (1)
1.1%John Segner
1,000,000 (1)
1.0%James J. Komadina
1,500,000 (1)
1.5%Officer and Directors of the Company as a group

(9 persons)
13,157,615 (1)
12.8 %


* Less than 1%.





(1)  A director of the Company.  Includes the following options to purchase common shares:





Name
Number of Options

(#)
Exercise Price

($)
Date of ExpirationPatrick L. Glazier
61,000

187,646

200,000

150,000

250,000
1.30

2.00

0.55

0.55

0.75
March 22, 2010

July 21, 2010

December 18, 2012

April 24, 2014

December 15, 2014
  26
  Name
Number of Options

(#)
Exercise Price

($)
Date of Expiration
 Brian C. Irwin
156,373

200,000

250,000

150,000
2.00

0.55

0.55

0.75
July 21, 2010

December 18, 2012

April 24, 2014

December 15, 2014Mark E. Jones, III
500,390

350,000

500,000
2.00

0.55

0.75
July 21, 2010

April 24, 2014

December 15, 2014Leendert G. Krol
155,100

469,115

200,000

350,000

400,000
1.30

2.00

0.55

0.55

0.75
March 22, 2010

July 21, 2010

December 18, 2012

April 24, 2014

December 15, 2014Dr. Roger David Morton
40,000

125,098

100,000

150,000

200,000
1.30

2.00

0.55

0.55

0.75
March 22, 2010

July 21, 2010

December 18, 2012

April 24, 2014

December 15, 2014Gregory Chorny
200,000

150,000

100,000
0.50

0.55

0.75
August 8, 2013

April 24, 2014

December 15, 2014Elton L. S. Pereira
100,000 (4)

300,000 (4)

250,000 (4)

150,000

250,000

150,000
0.57

0.57

0.57

0.55

0.55

0.75
February 15, 2010

August 4, 2010

May 11, 2012

December 18, 2012

April 24, 2014

December 15, 2014John Segner
150,000
0.75
December 15, 2014James J. Komadina
500,000

1,000,000
0.70

0.59
October 1, 2014

November 25, 2014





(2)  The beneficial owner has sole ownership, with the exception of a total of 630,875 shares, where ownerhips is shared.


(3)  The beneficial owner has sole ownership, with the exception of a total of 500,000 shares, where ownership is shared.


(4)  These options were re-priced in May 2008 to $0.57.





Shares Subject to Options





The Company maintains a stock option plan for its directors, officers and employees and may issue up to 13,000,000 options. The following table sets forth the Company’s compensation plans under which equity securities are authorized for issuance at the dates indicated.




27




Equity Compensation Plan Information as of June 30, 2010Plan category
Number of securities to

be issued upon exercise

of outstanding options,

warrants and rights
Weighted-average

exercise price of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights
Number of securities

remaining available for

future issuance under

equity compensation

plans (excluding

securities reflected in

column (a))(a)
(b)
(c)Equity compensation

plans approved by

security holders
9,249,588
$0.85
3,750,412Equity compensation

plans not approved by

security holders
-0-
N/A
-0-Total
9,249,588
$0.85
3,750,412





Under the terms of the plan, the exercise price of each option equals the closing market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. Most of the options granted under the Company’s stock option plan are subject to vesting requirements (25% on the date of grant and 12.5% on each quarter end thereafter) and all have a term of five years.  Options are issued at the discretion of the Board of Directors.  As of June 30, 2010, included in the 9,249,588 common share options outstanding were the 8,088,622 common stock options granted to directors and officers as disclosed in the second preceding table plus a total of 960,966 and 200,000 common stock options issued to employees and consultants, respectively.





Item 7.
Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions





A.
Major Shareholders





The following table sets forth, as of June 30, 2010, the number of Common Stock and the corresponding percentage ownership of each person who held of record, or was known by the Company to own beneficially, more than five percent of the Company’s Common Stock.  Unless otherwise indicated, the Company believes the following persons have sole voting and investment power with respect to the number of shares set forth opposite their names.





Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
Number of Shares
Percent of ClassCDS & Co.  (1)

P. O. Box 1038, Station A, 25 The Esplanade

Toronto, Ontario M5W 1G5
62,441,345
66.54%Cede & Co.  (1)

P.O. Box 20, Bowling Green Station

New York, New York 10274
7,048,007
28.82%Eldorado Gold Corporation

1188 – 550 Burrard Street

Vancouver, BC V6C 2B5
14,326,000
15.26%





(1)  It is the understanding of the Company that all of these shares are held by the record shareholder in a nominal, fiduciary, trustee or similar capacity.  The Company is unaware of the identities of the beneficial owners of these shares, with the exception of shares held by the Company’s officers or directors included in such share positions.




28





To the best of the Company’s knowledge, the Company is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation, by any foreign government or by any other natural or legal person severally or jointly.





The Company’s common stock is issued in registered form and the following information is taken from the records of Computershare Investor Services Inc. located in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, the registrar and transfer agent for the common stock.  As of June 30, 2010 there were 92 holders of record of the Company’s Common Stock including 69 in the United States who collectively held 30,320,838 common shares, representing 32% of the total issued and outstanding shares of 93,846,0551 common shares.





On May 28, 2010, a total of 100,000 common shares were issued as a result of exercise of the same number of stock options with an exercise price of $0.55. The Company received exercise proceeds totaling $55,000.





On May 12, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Eldorado, pursuant to which, subject to certain conditions, Eldorado would acquire, by way of court approved Plan of Arrangement, all the issued and outstanding shares of the Company. The transaction is expected to close by July 20, 2010 and is subject to customary conditions including without limitation the approval of British Columbia Supreme Court and certain regulatory approvals. Details of the agreement are described in Item 4.A, above, and Item 8.B below.





On March 22, 2010, a total of 300,000 common shares were issued as a result of exercise of the same number of stock options with an exercise price of $0.51. The Company received exercise proceeds totaling $153,000.





In November 2009, the Company closed a private placement of 7,659,699 units at $0.65 per unit for gross proceeds of $4,978,804.  Each unit consists of one common share and one half of one share purchase warrant.  Each of the 3,829,849 warrants would entitle the holder to purchase one additional common share of the Company at $1.00 until May 3, 2011. Additionally, brokerage agents received 475,180 agent’s warrants, entitling the holder to purchase one additional unit of the Company at $0.65 until May 3, 2011; each unit consists of one common share and one half of one share purchase warrant (the “underlying warrant”), entitling the holder to purchase one additional common share of the Company at $1.00 until May 3, 2011. Eldorado participated with the acquisition of 1,032,000 units.





In July 2008, the Company reached an agreement with Eldorado and completed a private placement required as part of Eldorado’s earn-in on an option to acquire an initial 60% interest in the Tocantinzinho Properties.  The private placement consisted of the issuance of 8,800,000 units of the Company (the “Units”) to Eldorado at the price of $0.95 per Unit. Each Unit consists of one common share and one-half of one non-transferable share purchase warrant. Until exercise of the second option, more particularly described in item 5A Eldorado has agreed that it will exercise or cause to be exercised all voting rights attached to the Company’s shares issued pursuant to the private placement  in favor of the directors nominated by management for election at each annual general meeting of the shareholders of  the Company.





In February 2007 the Company and Talon Metals Corp. entered into a Voting Trust and Placement Rights Agreement (the “Voting Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company had the right to direct the voting of the shares issued to Talon Metals Corp. except in certain conditions, including but not limited to a merger, amalgamation or a sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.  Further, the Company had the right to find purchasers for the shares if Talon Metals Corp. wished to sell.  The Voting Agreement would terminate on the earliest of: (i) the day following the second shareholders meeting after the Voting Agreement is entered into, (ii) eighteen months after the Voting Agreement is entered into, and (iii) the date on which the shares held by Talon Metals Corp. and its affiliates represent in the aggregate less than 10% of the then outstanding shares.





In September 2007, Talon sold 8,214,500 common shares of the Company to several third parties.  After the sale Talon holds 4,935,500 shares or approximately 6.5% of the outstanding shares.  The Voting Agreement terminated when the holdings of Company common shares by Talon became less than 10% of the Company’s outstanding common shares.  The Company and Talon entered into an agreement whereby Talon agreed that it will not sell any of its remaining common shares of the Company for six months without the prior consent of the Company.




29




B.
Related Party Transactions





All related party transactions are discussed in Item 6 above.





C.
Interests of Experts and Counsel





This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.





Item 8.
Financial Information





A.
Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information





Consolidated Financial Statements





The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company included as part of this Annual Report on Form 20-F are incorporated by reference in response to this Item 8.  An index to the Consolidated Financial Statements is included in Item 17.





Legal or Arbitration Proceedings





There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party or to which any of their property is subject.  The Company is involved from time to time in claims arising in the normal course of business.




A legal action was filed against the Company in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Canada, in August 1996 by James M. Cairns relating to a claim by Mr. Cairns for the failure of the Company to make a timely release of escrow shares.  In fiscal 2009, the action was dismissed for lack of prosecution.







Dividend Policy





The Company has never declared or paid cash dividends on its Common Stock.  The Company presently intends to retain cash for the operation and development of its business and does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.  A future determination as to the payment of dividends will depend on a number of factors, including future earnings, capital requirements, the financial condition and prospects of the Company and such other factors as the Board of Directors of the Company deems relevant.








B.
Significant Changes





On May 11, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Eldorado, in which Eldorado would acquire, by way of court approved Plan of Arrangement (the “Arrangement”), the issued and outstanding shares of the Company not held by Eldorado. Each Brazauro Share not held by Eldorado would be exchanged for 0.0675 of a share of Eldorado plus one third of a share of a new exploration company. Eldorado’s outstanding warrants to purchase Brazauro Shares will be cancelled and the Company ‘s remaining unexercised options and warrants will be exercisable for Eldorado shares on substantially identical terms, adjusted in respect of exercise price and number, on the same exchange ratio being offered for the shares of the Company .





Through the Arrangement, Eldorado would acquire the Company ‘s flagship Tocantinzinho project as well as the Agua Branca and Piranhas properties. The remaining exploration assets of the Company will become assets of a newly incorporated company and all holders of the Company’s shares, except Eldorado, would receive one third of a share of the new company for each share held of the Company. In addition, Eldorado will provide $10 million in funding to the new company upon the closing of the transaction.




30





The Arrangement has been approved by the board of directors of the Company and the arrangement is subject to, among other things, the final approval of the British Columbia Supreme Court, receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals, the approval by at least 662⁄3 per cent of the votes cast by the holders of common shares of the Company , at least 662⁄3 per cent of the votes cast by holders of options and warrants of the Company and shareholders, the approval by a simple majority of shareholders (excluding Eldorado and any other shareholders excluded by Multilateral Instrument 61-101), and the satisfaction or waiver of other conditions precedent to the arrangement. The hearing in respect of the final order to approve the arrangement is currently scheduled to take place on or about July 16, 2010, with the completion of the arrangement to occur no later than July 20, 2010.





In May 2010, the Company decided to abandon certain mineral claims in the Bom Jardim area due to poor exploration results. As a result, the property was written-down by $929,848 as of April 30, 2010.








Item 9.
The Offer and Listing





A.
Offer and Listing Details





The Company’s Common Stock is listed on the TSX Venture Exchange (“the TSX”) in British Columbia, Canada under the symbol “BZO”.  The Company’s Common Stock is not traded on an exchange or market in the United States.





The high and low sales prices (in Canadian dollars) as quoted on the TSX for the below referenced fiscal years were as follows:





Price Range of Common StockFiscal Year Ended January 31,
High
Low2010
0.75
0.352009
0.90
0.102008
1.00
0.432007
1.64
0.602006
2.50
0.80








The high and low sales prices (in Canadian dollars) as quoted on the TSX for the below referenced quarterly periods were as follows:





Price Range of Common StockFiscal Year Ended January 312010


2009Fiscal Quarter Ended

High


Low


High


LowApril 30


0.74



0.35



0.43



0.10July 31


0.75



0.53



0.57



0.14October 31


0.74



0.55



0.90



0.34January 31


0.69



0.50



0.73



0.46





31




The high and low sales prices (in Canadian dollars) as quoted on the TSX for the below referenced months were as follows:





Price Range of Common StockMonth Ended
High
LowJanuary 2010
0.67
0.59February 2010
0.68
0.56March 2010
0.64
0.55April 2010
0.59
0.47May 2010
1.33
0.49June 2010
1.46
1.20








B.
Plan of Distribution





This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.





C.
Markets





The common shares of the Company trade on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol “BZO”.





Item 10.
Additional Information





A.
Share Capital





This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.





B.
Memorandum and Articles of Association





Please see Exhibits 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5.





C.
Material Contracts





The following is a summary of the material contracts entered into by the Company for the two years ended June 30, 2010:





In July 8, 2008, the Company reached an agreement with Eldorado Gold Corporation (“Eldorado”) and completed a private placement required as part of Eldorado’s earn-in on an option to acquire an initial 60% interest in the Tocantinzinho Properties.  The terms of this agreement are described in “Item 8.B Financial Statements,” above.





The option agreement dated July 18, 2008 between Maria Teresa Barbosa Da Silva and the Company relating to the acquisition of  the mineral rights to the 20,688 hectare Piranha Property, the terms of which are described in “Item 8.B Financial Statements,” above.





In November 2008, the Company’s board of directors approved the adoption of a Shareholder Rights Plan (the “Rights Plan”).  By an agreement dated May 14, 2009, the Company amended its Rights Plan, and on June 12, 2009, shareholders ratified the Rights Plan, as amended, to maintain it in full force and effect. The Rights Plan, as





32





amended, has an initial term which expires at the annual general meeting of shareholders of the Company to be held in 2012, unless terminated earlier.  The Rights Plan may be extended beyond 2012 by resolution of shareholders at such meeting.




Brazauro entered into a Financial Advisory engagement letter dated June 19, 2009 with BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. (“BMO”) pursuant to which, among other things, BMO agreed to provide its opinion as to the fairness of the consideration to be received in a proposed Transaction, from a financial point of view, to Brazauro Shareholders. The terms of the engagement agreement between Brazauro and BMO provide that BMO is to be paid a fee for its services as financial advisor to Brazauro, a fee on delivery of the Fairness Opinion, no portion of which is contingent upon such opinion being favourable, and fees that are contingent on an unsolicited offer being made for any of the securities of Brazauro or a proposed Transaction or another transaction is completed. In addition, Brazauro has agreed to reimburse BMO for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with the engagement and to indemnify BMO and certain related persons against certain liabilities in certain circumstances.





In August 2009, the Company entered into an option agreement with Maria Tereza Barbosa da Silva under which it may acquire the mineral rights to additional 7,229 hectares in the Piranhas area. The terms of the agreement are described in “Item 8.B Financial Statements,” above.





In August 2009, the Company entered into a non-binding letter of intent with Brazmin Ltda. and Talon Metals Corp. (“Talon”) to option the Agua Branca property from Talon’s Brazilian subsidiary.  Agua Branca consists of approximately 9,356 hectares of exploration licenses in the Tapajós region of Pará state, Brazil. Effective December 10, 2009, the Company and Talon entered into a definitive agreement on the terms described in “Item 8.B Financial Statements,” above.





Amending agreement dated December 4, 2009 amending the Option Agreement dated July 31, 2003 between the Company and Dennis Moore and Alan Carter with respect to the Tocantinzinho Property, Brazil. Under the Amending Agreement the parties have agreed that Brazauro can buy down the royalty from 3.5% to 1.5% in two increments of 1% each. The first payment of $2,000,000 will be triggered by certain events including the exercise, if at all, by Eldorado Gold Corporation under its Option/Joint Venture agreement with the Company to acquire 60% of the Tocantinzinho project or failing such exercise by completion of project financing, the making of a production decision or other specified events. The second payment of $3,500,000 will be triggered by the making of a construction decision to proceed with the development of the Tocantinzinho Project. The amended royalty will cover all the ground referred to in the original agreement signed with the royalty holders in 2003 which encompasses the entire Tocantinzinho mineralized deposit.




In December 2009, the Company entered into an option agreement with Marlene Soares Tavares under which it may acquire the mineral rights to additional 7,404 hectares property in the Piranhas area. The terms of the agreement are described in “Item 8.B, Financial Statements” above.





On May 12, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Eldorado, pursuant to which, subject to certain conditions, Eldorado would acquire, by way of court approved Plan of Arrangement, all the issued and outstanding shares of the Company. The transaction is expected to close by July 20, 2010 and is subject to customary conditions including without limitation the approval of British Columbia Supreme Court and certain regulatory approvals. Details of the agreement are described in Item 4.A and Item 8.B above.








D.
Exchange Controls





The Company is not aware of governmental laws, decrees or regulations in Canada restricting the import or export of capital or affecting the remittance to the United States of interest, dividends or other payments to non-resident holders of the Company’s Common Stock.  However, the payment or crediting of interest or dividends to United States residents may be subject to applicable withholding taxes at a rate prescribed by the Income Tax Act (Canada)  and as further modified by the provisions of the Canada-United States Tax Convention (1980) (see “Taxation” below).




33





Except as provided in the Investment Canada Act (the “ICA”), there are no limitations under the laws of Canada, the Province of British Columbia or in the charter and organizational documents of the Company on the right of nonresident or foreigner owners to hold and/or vote the shares of the Company.





The ICA applies when a “non-Canadian” individual or entity or controlled group of entities as defined in the ICA proposes to make an investment to acquire control of a Canadian business enterprise, either directly or indirectly, and by way of purchase of voting shares of a corporation or of substantially all of the assets used in the Canadian business enterprise.  An investment in voting shares of a corporation is deemed to be an acquisition of control where more than 50% of the voting shares are acquired.  An acquisition of less than one-third of the voting shares of a corporation is deemed not to be an acquisition of control and an acquisition of between one-third and one-half of the voting shares of a corporation is presumed to be an acquisition of control unless it can be established that the acquisition does not in fact result in control of the corporation by the investor.





An investment to acquire control of a Canadian business enterprise, the gross assets of which exceed certain thresholds, must be reviewed and approved under the ICA before implementation.  An investment to acquire control of a Canadian business enterprise, the gross asset value of which falls below these threshold amounts, is one in respect of which notification must be given under the ICA although approval is not required prior to implementation of the investment.   NAFTA Investors, (i.e.) investors who are nationals, other than Canadian, as defined in the North American Free Trade Agreement, are not considered for the purposes of the ICA to be “non-Canadian”.





E.
Taxation





Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations





The following summary is relevant to a holder of common shares who (i) is the beneficial owner of the common shares; (ii) is not, and has never been, a resident or deemed resident of Canada for the purposes of the Income Tax Act(Canada) (the “ITA”), (iii) is considered a resident of the United States and a “qualifying person” for the purposes of the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention(the “Treaty”) entitled to full benefits thereof, (iv) does not use or hold and is not deemed to use or hold common shares in, or in the course of, carrying on a business in Canada, and (v) has not acquired their common shares pursuant to a tax-deferred exchange under the ITA.




Special rules, which are not discussed below, may apply to a holder  that are insurers which carry on business in Canada and elsewhere, and this summary is not applicable to such holders. Such holders should consult their own tax advisors.





This summary is based on the current provisions of the ITA, the regulations thereunder (the “Regulations”), all proposals to amend the ITA and the Regulations publicly announced by or on behalf of the Minister of Finance (Canada) prior to the date hereof (the “Proposals”) and counsel’s understanding of the administrative and assessing practices and policies of the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) which have been made publicly available prior to the date hereof. No assurance can be given that the Proposals will be enacted as proposed, if at all. This summary does not take into account or anticipate any other changes in law, whether by legislative, regulatory, administrative or judicial decision or action or changes in the administrative practices of CRA, is not exhaustive of all Canadian federal income tax considerations and does not take into account other federal tax considerations or provincial, territorial or foreign income tax legislation or considerations.





This summary is of a general nature only and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any particular holder. The tax liability of a holder will depend on the holder’s particular circumstances. Accordingly, holders should consult their own tax advisors for advice with respect to their own particular circumstances.





34


Dividends


Generally, dividends paid by a Canadian corporation to non-resident individuals or corporations are subject to withholding tax at a rate of 25% under Part XIII of the ITA.  However, under paragraph 2 of Article X of the Treaty the withholding tax rate may be reduced, as follows, to:





a)
5% of the gross amount of the dividends if the beneficial owner of such dividends is a US resident company which owns at least 10% of the voting stock of the corporation paying the dividends; and





b)
15% of the gross amount of the dividends in all other cases.





Dispositions of Capital Property





Capital gains realized by a non-resident person on the disposal of shares that are considered to be taxable Canadian property(“TCP”), as defined in the ITA, are taxable in Canada as capital gains.  Under draft amendments to the ITA, the shares of a Canadian public corporation will be TCP where at any time during the preceding 60 month period (i) a shareholder, together with persons with whom the shareholder does not deal at arm’s length have owned at least 25% of the issued shares of any class of the shares of the public corporation; and (ii) more than 50% of the fair market value of a common share of the company is derived directly or indirectly from one or any combination of (A) real or immovable property situated in Canada; (B) Canadian resource property (as defined in the ITA); (C) timber resource property (as defined in the ITA), or (D) options in respect of, or interests in property described in any of (A) through (C) above, whether or not such property exists. “Arm’s length is a term defined in the ITA.





If a US resident shareholder disposes of shares that are TCP, the shareholder may be exempt from tax in Canada under Article XIII of the Treaty if, at the time of the disposition of the shares, the value of the shares was derived principally from something other than direct or indirect real property interests situated in Canada.  Real property interest is defined in the Treaty to include gains on Canadian real and resource properties and shares of companies that derive more than half of their value from such properties.





The ACB of a share includes the cost of the share plus or minus any adjustments that may be required under the ITA. The ACB of each common share of a corporation owned by an investor at any particular time will be the average ACB to him of all common shares of that corporation owned at that time.





Disposition of Non-Capital Property





The foregoing discussion is a summary of certain tax considerations which may be relevant to shareholders of the Company.  It is not intended as a substitute for personal tax planning and professional tax advice.





Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations





The following is a summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder (as defined below) arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Stock of the Company.





This summary is for general information purposes only and does not purport to be a complete analysis or listing of all potential U.S. federal income tax consequences that may apply to a U.S. Holder as a result of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Stock.  In addition, this summary does not take into account the individual facts and circumstances of any particular U.S. Holder that may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Stock.  Accordingly, this summary is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal or U.S. federal income tax advice with respect to any U.S. Holder.  Each U.S. Holder should consult its own financial advisor, legal counsel, or accountant regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Stock.





Notice Pursuant To IRS Circular 230:  Anything contained in this summary concerning any U.S. federal tax issue is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by a U.S. Holder, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.  This summary was written to support the promotion or marketing of the transactions or matters addressed by this Form 20-F.  Each U.S. Holder should seek U.S. federal tax advice, based on such U.S. Holder’s particular circumstances, from an independent tax advisor.




35




Scope of this Summary





Authorities





This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury Regulations (whether final, temporary, or proposed), published rulings of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), published administrative positions of the IRS, the Convention Between Canada and the United States of America with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital, signed September 26, 1980, as amended (the “Canada-U.S. Tax Convention”), and U.S. court decisions that are applicable and, in each case, as in effect and available, as of the date of this Form 20-F.  Any of the authorities on which this summary is based could be changed in a material and adverse manner at any time, and any such change could be applied on a retroactive basis.  This summary does not discuss the potential effects, whether adverse or beneficial, of any proposed legislation that, if enacted, could be applied on a retroactive basis.





U.S. Holders





For purposes of this summary, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of the Company’s Common Stock that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is (a) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the U.S., (b) a corporation, or any other entity classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, that is created or organized in or under the laws of the U.S. or any state in the U.S., including the District of Columbia, (c) an estate if the income of such estate is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of the source of such income, or (d) a trust if (i) such trust has validly elected to be treated as a U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax purposes or (ii) a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of such trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of such trust.





Non-U.S. Holders





For purposes of this summary, a “non-U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of Common Stock other than a U.S. Holder.  This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Stock to non-U.S. Holders.  Accordingly, a non-U.S. Holder should consult its own financial advisor, legal counsel, or accountant regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences (including the potential application of and operation of any tax treaties) of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Stock.





U.S. Holders Subject to Special U.S. Federal Income Tax Rules Not Addressed





This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Stock to U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including the following U.S. Holders: (a) U.S. Holders that are tax-exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, individual retirement accounts, or other tax-deferred accounts; (b) U.S. Holders that are financial institutions, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, or regulated investment companies; (c) U.S. Holders that are dealers in securities or currencies or U.S. Holders that are traders in securities that elect to apply a mark-to-market accounting method; (d) U.S. Holders that have a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar; (e) U.S. Holders that own Common Stock as part of a straddle, hedging transaction, conversion transaction, constructive sale, or other arrangement involving more than one position; (f) U.S. Holders that acquired Common Stock in connection with the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for services; (g) U.S. Holders that hold Common Stock other than as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code; (h) U.S. expatriates or former long-term residents of the U.S.; or (i) U.S. Holders that own, directly, indirectly, or by attribution, 10% or more, by voting power or value, of the outstanding shares of the Company.  U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including U.S. Holders described immediately above, should consult their own financial advisor, legal counsel or accountant regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Stock.





If an entity that is classified as a partnership (or “pass-through” entity) for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds Common Stock, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such partnership (or “pass-through” entity) and the





36





partners of such partnership (or owners of such “pass-through” entity) generally will depend on the activities of the partnership (or “pass-through” entity) and the status of such partners (or owners).  Partners of entities that are classified as partnerships (or owners of “pass-through” entities) for U.S. federal income tax purposes should consult their own financial advisor, legal counsel or accountant regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Stock.





Tax Consequences Not Addressed





This summary does not address the U.S. state and local, U.S. federal alternative minimum tax; U.S. federal estate and gift, or foreign tax consequences to U.S. Holders of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Stock.  Each U.S. Holder should consult its own financial advisor, legal counsel, or accountant regarding the U.S. state and local, U.S. federal alternative minimum tax, U.S. federal estate and gift, and foreign tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Stock.





U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Acquisition, Ownership, and Disposition of Common Stock





Distributions on Common Stock





Subject to the “passive foreign investment company” (“PFIC”) rules discussed below, a U.S. Holder that receives a distribution, including a constructive distribution, with respect to Common Stock will be required to include the amount of such distribution in gross income as a dividend (without reduction for any foreign income tax withheld from such distribution) to the extent of the current or accumulated “earnings and profits” of the Company.  To the extent that a distribution exceeds the current and accumulated “earnings and profits” of the Company, such distribution will be treated (a) first, as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of a U.S. Holder’s tax basis in Common Stock and, (b) thereafter, as gain from the sale or exchange of such Common Stock.  However, the Company does not intend to maintain the calculations of earnings and profits in accordance with U.S. federal income tax principles, and each U.S. Holder should therefore assume that any distribution by the Company with respect to Common Stock will constitute ordinary dividend income.  Dividends paid on Common Stock generally will not be eligible for the “dividends received deduction.”





For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2011, a dividend paid by the Company generally will be taxed at the preferential tax rates applicable to long-term capital gains if (a) the Company is a “qualified foreign corporation” (as defined below), (b) the U.S. Holder receiving such dividend is an individual, estate, or trust, and (c) certain holding period requirements are met.





The Company generally will be a “qualified foreign corporation” under Section 1(h)(11) of the Code (a “QFC”) if (a) the Company is incorporated in a possession of the U.S., (b) the Company is eligible for the benefits of the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention, or (c) the Common Stock is readily tradable on an established securities market in the U.S.  However, even if the Company satisfies one or more of such requirements, the Company will not be treated as a QFC if the Company is a PFIC, as discussed below, for the taxable year during which the Company pays a dividend or for the preceding taxable year.





As discussed below, the Company believes that it was a PFIC for the taxable year ended January 31, 2010, and based on business plans and financial projections, the Company expects that it will be a PFIC for the taxable year ending January 31, 2011. (See more detailed discussion at “Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules” below).  The determination of whether the Company will be a PFIC for a taxable year depends, in part, on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which are subject to differing interpretations.  In addition, whether the Company will be a PFIC for its current taxable year depends on the assets and income of the Company over the course of each such taxable year and, as a result, cannot be predicted with certainty as of the date of this Form 20-F.  Consequently, there can be no assurance regarding the Company’s PFIC status for any taxable year during which U.S. Holders hold Common Stock, and there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the determination made by the Company concerning its PFIC status.





If the Company is not a PFIC, but a U.S. Holder otherwise fails to qualify for the preferential tax rate applicable to dividends discussed above, a dividend paid by the Company to a U.S. Holder, including a U.S. Holder that is an





37





individual, estate, or trust, generally will be taxed at ordinary income tax rates (and not at the preferential tax rates applicable to long-term capital gains).  The dividend rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own financial advisor, legal counsel, or accountant regarding the dividend rules.





Disposition of Common Stock





A U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss on the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Stock in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between (a) the amount of cash plus the fair market value of any property received and (b) such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in Common Stock sold or otherwise disposed of.  Subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, any such gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss, which will be long-term capital gain or loss if Common Stock are held for more than one year.  Gain or loss recognized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Stock generally will be treated as “U.S. source” for purposes of applying the U.S. foreign tax credit rules, unless such gains are resourced as “foreign source” under an applicable income tax treaty, and an election is filed under the Code.  (See more detailed discussion at “Foreign Tax Credit” below).





Preferential tax rates currently apply to long-term capital gains of a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate, or trust.  There are currently no preferential tax rates for long-term capital gains of a U.S. Holder that is a corporation.  Deductions for capital losses are subject to significant limitations under the Code.





Receipt of Foreign Currency





The amount of any distribution paid in foreign currency to a U.S. Holder in connection with the ownership of Common Stock, or on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of Common Stock, generally will be equal to the U.S. dollar value of such foreign currency based on the exchange rate applicable on the date of receipt (regardless of whether such foreign currency is converted into U.S. dollars at that time).  A U.S. Holder that receives foreign currency and converts such foreign currency into U.S. dollars at a conversion rate other than the rate in effect on the date of receipt may have a foreign currency exchange gain or loss, which generally would be treated as U.S. source ordinary income or loss.





Taxable dividends with respect to Common Stock that are paid in foreign currency will be included in the gross income of a U.S. Holder as translated into U.S. dollars calculated by reference to the exchange rate prevailing on the date of actual or constructive receipt of the dividend, regardless of whether the foreign currency is converted into U.S. dollars at that time.  If the foreign currency received is not converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Holder will have a basis in the foreign currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt.  Any U.S. Holder who receives payment in foreign currency and engages in a subsequent conversion or other disposition of the foreign currency may have a foreign currency exchange gain or loss that would be treated as ordinary income or loss, and generally will be U.S. source income or loss for foreign tax credit purposes.  Each U.S. Holder should consult its own U.S. tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of receiving, owning, and disposing of foreign currency.





Foreign Tax Credit





A U.S. Holder who pays (whether directly or through withholding) foreign income tax with respect to dividends paid on Common Stock generally will be entitled, at the election of such U.S. Holder, to receive either a deduction or a credit for such foreign income tax paid.  Generally, a credit will reduce a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability on a dollar-for-dollar basis, whereas a deduction will reduce a U.S. Holder’s income subject to U.S. federal income tax.  This election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign taxes paid (whether directly or through withholding) by a U.S. Holder during a year.





Complex limitations apply to the foreign tax credit, including the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability that such U.S. Holder’s “foreign source” taxable income bears to such U.S. Holder’s worldwide taxable income.  In applying this limitation, a U.S. Holder’s various items of income and deduction must be classified, under complex rules, as either “foreign source” or “U.S. source.”  In addition, this limitation is calculated separately with respect to specific categories of income.  Dividends paid by the Company generally will constitute “foreign source” income and generally will be categorized as “passive





38





income.”  The foreign tax credit rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own financial advisor, legal counsel, or accountant regarding the foreign tax credit rules.





Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules





The Company generally will be a PFIC under Section 1297 of the Code if, for a taxable year, (a) 75% or more of the gross income of the Company for such taxable year is passive income or (b) 50% or more of the assets held by the Company either produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income, based on the fair market value of such assets.  “Gross income” generally means all revenues less cost of goods sold.  “Passive income” includes, for example, dividends, interest, certain rents and royalties, certain gains from the sale of stock and securities, and certain gains from commodities transactions.





For purposes of the PFIC income test and asset test described above, if the Company owns, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the total value of the outstanding shares of another corporation, the Company will be treated as if it (a) held a proportionate share of the assets of such other corporation and (b) received directly a proportionate share of the income of such other corporation.  In addition, for purposes of the PFIC income test and asset test described above, “passive income” does not include any interest, dividends, rents, or royalties that are received or accrued by the Company from a “related person” (as defined in Section 954(d)(3) of the Code), to the extent such items are properly allocable to the income of such related person that is not passive income.





In addition, if the Company is a PFIC and owns shares of another foreign corporation that also is a PFIC (a “Subsidiary PFIC”), under certain indirect ownership rules, a disposition of the shares of such Subsidiary PFIC or a distribution received from such other Subsidiary PFIC generally will be treated as an indirect disposition by a U.S. Holder or an indirect distribution received by a U.S. Holder, subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed below.  To the extent that gain recognized on the actual disposition by a U.S. Holder of Common Stock or income recognized by a U.S. Holder on an actual distribution received on Common Stock was previously subject to U.S. federal income tax under these indirect ownership rules, such amount generally should not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.





The Company believes that it was a PFIC for the taxable year ended January 31, 2010, and based on business plans and financial projections, the Company expects that it will be a PFIC for the taxable year ending January 31, 2011.    The determination of whether the Company will be a PFIC for a taxable year depends, in part, on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which are subject to differing interpretations.  In addition, whether the Company will be a PFIC for its current taxable year depends on the assets and income of the Company over the course of each such taxable year and, as a result, cannot be predicted with certainty as of the date of this Form 20-F.  Consequently, there can be no assurance regarding the Company’s PFIC status for any taxable year during which U.S. Holders hold Common Stock, and there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the determination made by the Company concerning its PFIC status.





If a U.S. Holder owns Common Stock in any taxable year in which the Company is a PFIC, such U.S. Holder generally would be required to file IRS Form 8621 (or other form specified by the U.S. Department of the Treasury) with the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax return for the appropriate taxable year.  Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding this filing requirement.




Default PFIC Rules Under Section 1291 of the Code





If the Company is a PFIC, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Stock will depend on whether such U.S. Holder makes an election to treat the Company and each Subsidiary PFIC, if any, as a “qualified electing fund” or “QEF” under Section 1295 of the Code (a “QEF Election”) or a mark-to-market election under Section 1296 of the Code (a “Mark-to-Market Election”).  A U.S. Holder that does not make either a QEF Election or a Mark-to-Market Election will be referred to in this summary as a “Non-Electing U.S. Holder.”





A Non-Electing U.S. Holder will be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code with respect to (a) any gain recognized on the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Stock and (b) any excess distribution paid on the





39





Common Stock.  A distribution generally will be an “excess distribution” to the extent that such distribution (together with all other distributions received in the current taxable year) exceeds 125% of the average distributions received during the three preceding taxable years (or during a U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Common Stock, if shorter).





Under Section 1291 of the Code, any gain recognized on the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Stock, and any excess distribution paid on the Common Stock, must be ratably allocated to each day in a Non-Electing U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Common Stock.  The amount of any such gain or excess distribution allocated to prior years of such Non-Electing U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Common Stock (other than years prior to the first taxable year of the Company beginning after December 31, 1986 for which the Company was not a PFIC) will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the highest tax applicable to ordinary income in each such prior year.  A Non-Electing U.S. Holder will be required to pay interest on the resulting tax liability for each such prior year, calculated as if such tax liability had been due in each such prior year.  Such a Non-Electing U.S. Holder that is not a corporation must treat any such interest paid as “personal interest,” which is not deductible.  The amount of any such gain or excess distribution allocated to the current year of such Non-Electing U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Common Stock will be treated as ordinary income in the current year, and no interest charge will be incurred with respect to the resulting tax liability for the current year.





If the Company is a PFIC for any taxable year during which a Non-Electing U.S. Holder holds Common Stock, the Company will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such Non-Electing U.S. Holder, regardless of whether the Company ceases to be a PFIC in one or more subsequent years.  A Non-Electing U.S. Holder may terminate this deemed PFIC status by electing to recognize gain (which will be taxed under the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above) as if such Common Stock were sold on the last day of the last taxable year for which the Company was a PFIC.





QEF Election





A U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election generally will not be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above.  However, a U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such U.S. Holder’s pro rata share of (a) the net capital gain of the Company and each Subsidiary PFIC, which will be taxed as long-term capital gain to such U.S. Holder, and (b) and the ordinary earnings of the Company and each Subsidiary PFIC, which will be taxed as ordinary income to such U.S. Holder.  Generally, “net capital gain” is the excess of (a) net long-term capital gain over (b) net short-term capital loss, and “ordinary earnings” are the excess of (a) “earnings and profits” over (b) net capital gain.  A U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such amounts for each taxable year in which the Company is a PFIC, regardless of whether such amounts are actually distributed to such U.S. Holder by the Company.  However, a U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election may, subject to certain limitations, elect to defer payment of current U.S. federal income tax on such amounts, subject to an interest charge.  If such U.S. Holder is not a corporation, any such interest paid will be treated as “personal interest,” which is not deductible.





A U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election generally (a) may receive a tax-free distribution from the Company to the extent that such distribution represents “earnings and profits” of the Company that were previously included in income by the U.S. Holder because of such QEF Election and (b) will adjust such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the Common Stock to reflect the amount included in income or allowed as a tax-free distribution because of such QEF Election.  In addition, a U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election generally will recognize capital gain or loss on the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Stock.





The procedure for making a QEF Election, and the U.S. federal income tax consequences of making a QEF Election, will depend on whether such QEF Election is timely.  A QEF Election will be treated as “timely” if such QEF Election is made for the first year in the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Common Stock in which the Company was a PFIC.  A U.S. Holder may make a timely QEF Election by filing the appropriate QEF Election documents at the time such U.S. Holder files a U.S. federal income tax return for such first year in respect of the Company and each Subsidiary PFIC, if any.  However, if the Company was a PFIC in a prior year, then in addition to filing the QEF Election documents, a U.S. Holder must elect to recognize (a) gain (which will be taxed under the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above) as if the Common Stock were sold on the qualification date or (b) if the





40





Company was also a CFC, such U.S. Holder’s pro rata share of the post-1986 “earnings and profits” of the Company as of the qualification date.  The “qualification date” is the first day of the first taxable year in which the Company was a QEF with respect to such U.S. Holder.  The election to recognize such gain or “earnings and profits” can only be made if such U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Common Stock includes the qualification date.  By electing to recognize such gain or “earnings and profits,” such U.S. Holder will be deemed to have made a timely QEF Election.  In addition, under very limited circumstances, a U.S. Holder may make a retroactive QEF Election if such U.S. Holder failed to file the QEF Election documents in a timely manner.  A U.S. Holder that did not make a timely QEF Election with respect to the Company is strongly urged to consult its own tax advisor regarding the availability of, and procedure for making, a retroactive QEF Election.




A QEF Election will apply to the taxable year for which such QEF Election is made and to all subsequent taxable years, unless such QEF Election is invalidated or terminated or the IRS consents to revocation of such QEF Election.  If a U.S. Holder makes a QEF Election and, in a subsequent taxable year, the Company ceases to be a PFIC, the QEF Election will remain in effect (although it will not be applicable) during those taxable years in which the Company is not a PFIC.  Accordingly, if the Company becomes a PFIC in another subsequent taxable year, the QEF Election will be effective and the U.S. Holder will be subject to the QEF rules described above during any such subsequent taxable year in which the Company qualifies as a PFIC.  In addition, the QEF Election will remain in effect (although it will not be applicable) with respect to a U.S. Holder even after such U.S. Holder disposes of all of such U.S. Holder’s direct and indirect interest in the Common Stock.  Accordingly, if such U.S. Holder reacquires an interest in the Company, such U.S. Holder will be subject to the QEF rules described above for each taxable year in which the Company is a PFIC.





Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the availability of, and procedure for making, a QEF Election. U.S. Holders should be aware that there can be no assurance that the Company will satisfy record keeping requirements that apply to a QEF, or that the Company will supply U.S. Holders with information that such U.S. Holders require to report under the QEF rules, in the event that the Company is a PFIC and a U.S. Holder wishes to make a QEF Election.





Mark-to-Market Election





A U.S. Holder may make a Mark-to-Market Election only if the Common Stock is marketable stock.  The Common Stock generally will be “marketable stock” if the Common Stock is regularly traded on (a) a national securities exchange that is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, (b) the national market system established pursuant to section 11A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or (c) a foreign securities exchange that is regulated or supervised by a governmental authority of the country in which the market is located, provided that (i) such foreign exchange has trading volume, listing, financial disclosure, and other requirements and the laws of the country in which such foreign exchange is located, together with the rules of such foreign exchange, ensure that such requirements are actually enforced and (ii) the rules of such foreign exchange ensure active trading of listed stocks.





A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election generally will not be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above.  However, if a U.S. Holder makes a Mark-to-Market Election after the beginning of such U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Common Stock and such U.S. Holder has not made a timely QEF Election, the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above will apply to certain dispositions of, and distributions on, the Common Stock.





A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will include in ordinary income, for each taxable year in which the Company is a PFIC, an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (a) the fair market value of the Common Stock as of the close of such taxable year over (b) such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in such Common Stock.  A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will be allowed a deduction in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) the excess, if any, of (i) such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Common Stock over (ii) the fair market value of such Common Stock as of the close of such taxable year or (b) the excess, if any, of (i) the amount included in ordinary income because of such Mark-to-Market Election for prior taxable years over (ii) the amount allowed as a deduction because of such Mark-to-Market Election for prior taxable years.




41





A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election generally also will adjust such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the Common Stock to reflect the amount included in gross income or allowed as a deduction because of such Mark-to-Market Election.  In addition, upon a sale or other taxable disposition of Common Stock, a U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will recognize ordinary income or loss (not to exceed the excess, if any, of (a) the amount included in ordinary income because of such Mark-to-Market Election for prior taxable years over (b) the amount allowed as a deduction because of such Mark-to-Market Election for prior taxable years).





A Mark-to-Market Election applies to the taxable year in which such Mark-to-Market Election is made and to each subsequent taxable year, unless the Common Stock cease to be “marketable stock” or the IRS consents to revocation of such Mark-to-Market Election.  Each U.S. Holder should consult its own financial advisor, legal counsel, or accountant regarding the availability of, and procedure for making, a Mark-to-Market Election.





Although a U.S. Holder may be eligible to make a Mark-to-Market Election with respect to the Common Stock, no Mark-to-Market Election may be made with respect to the stock of any Subsidiary PFIC that such U.S. Holder is treated as owning.  Hence, the Mark-to-Market Election will not be effective to eliminate the interest charge described above.





Other PFIC Rules





Under Section 1291(f) of the Code, the IRS has issued proposed Treasury Regulations that, subject to certain exceptions, would cause a U.S. Holder that had not made a timely QEF Election to recognize gain (but not loss) upon certain transfers of Common Stock that would otherwise be tax-deferred (e.g., gifts and exchanges pursuant to corporate reorganizations).  However, the specific U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder may vary based on the manner in which Common Stock are transferred.  Certain additional adverse rules will apply with respect to a U.S. Holder if the Company is a PFIC, regardless of whether such U.S. Holder makes a QEF Election.  For example under Section 1298(b)(6) of the Code, a U.S. Holder that uses Common Stock as security for a loan will, except as may be provided in Treasury Regulations, be treated as having made a taxable disposition of such Common Stock.





Special rules also apply to the amount of foreign tax credit that a U.S. Holder may claim on a distribution from a PFIC.





The PFIC rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own financial advisor, legal counsel, or accountant regarding the PFIC rules and how the PFIC rules may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Common Stock.





Recent Legislative Developments




Newly enacted legislation requires certain U.S. Holders who are individuals, estates or trusts to pay up to an additional 3.8% tax on, among other things, dividends and capital gains for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012.  In addition, for taxable years beginning after March 18, 2010, new legislation requires certain U.S. Holders who are individuals that hold certain foreign financial assets (which may include shares of Common Stock) to report information relating to such assets, subject to certain exceptions.  Each U.S. Holder should consult its tax advisor regarding the effect, if any, of this legislation on its ownership and disposition of shares of Common Stock.




Information Reporting; Backup Withholding For Certain Payments





Under U.S. federal income tax law and regulations, certain categories of U.S. Holders must file information returns with respect to their investment in, or involvement in, a foreign corporation.  Penalties for failure to file certain of these information returns are substantial.  U.S. Holders of Common Stock should consult with their own tax advisors regarding the requirements of filing information returns, and if applicable, any “mark-to-market election” or “QEF election” (each as defined below).





Payments made within the U.S., or by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, of dividends on, and proceeds arising from certain sales or other taxable dispositions of, Common Stock generally will be subject to information reporting and





42





backup withholding, currently at the rate of 28%, if a U.S. Holder (a) fails to furnish such U.S. Holder’s correct U.S. taxpayer identification number (generally on Form W-9), (b) furnishes an incorrect U.S. taxpayer identification number, (c) is notified by the IRS that such U.S. Holder has previously failed to properly report items subject to backup withholding, or (d) fails to certify, under penalty of perjury, that such U.S. Holder has furnished its correct U.S. taxpayer identification number and that the IRS has not notified such U.S. Holder that it is subject to backup withholding.  However, U.S. Holders that are corporations generally are excluded from these information reporting and backup withholding rules.  Any amounts withheld under the U.S. backup withholding rules will be allowed as a credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, or will be refunded, if such U.S. Holder furnishes required information to the IRS in a timely manner.  Each U.S. Holder should consult its own financial advisor, legal counsel, or accountant regarding the information reporting and backup withholding rules.





F.
Dividends and Paying Agents





This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.





G.
Statement By Experts





This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.





H.
Documents on Display





The documents referred to in this Form 20-F can be viewed at the office of the Company, which is located at 16360 Park Ten Place, Suite 217, Houston, TX  77084.  The Company is required to file financial statements and other information with all of the Securities Commissions in Canada electronically through the Canadian System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR) which can be viewed at www.sedar.com.





I.
Subsidiary Information





This information is not required for reports filed in the United States.





Item 11.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.





Transaction Risk and Currency Risk Management





The Company is not exposed to market risk related to derivative financial instruments or other financial instruments.  At the present time the Company has no long-term debt or source of revenue as the Company is in the resource exploration and development stage on its mineral property interests.





Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk





The Company is engaged in mineral exploration in Brazil.  The Company’s significant contracts related to its Brazilian activities are denominated in U.S. dollars.  The Company’s equity financings are denominated in Canadian dollars.  Changes in the price of foreign exchange rates could significantly affect the Company’s profitability and cash flows.  See “Key Information” under Item 3 above, for a description of factors relating to foreign exchange and currency fluctuations.  Its liabilities are denominated in Canadian and U.S. dollars.   The Company does not engage in hedging transactions at this time.





We operate on a multinational basis and a significant portion of our business is conducted in currencies other than the Canadian dollar, which is our financial reporting currency for the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.  The following table sets forth the principal components of the consolidated balance sheets as of January 31, 2010 and 2009 and the consolidated statements of operations for the two years then ended showing the sensitivity to exchange risk by showing the effect of a 10% hypothetical uniform weakening in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian Dollar:




43





Denominated inCanadian

Dollars


U.S.

Dollars


Total Value in

Canadian

Dollars


Effect of a 10%

Change in

Exchange

RateJanuary 31, 2010Cash and cash equivalents


5,369,832



314,547



5,704,919



1
%Accounts receivable


10,143



5,782



16,303



4
%Prepaid expenses


18,776



7,304



26,557



3
%Accounts payable and accrued liabilities


147,274



568,904



753,327



8
%January 31, 2009Cash and cash equivalents

$
4,421,396


$
1,294,238


$
6,021,592



3
%Marketable securities


-



170,874



211,268



10
%Accounts receivable


11,897



124,863



166,278



9
%Prepaid expenses


18,772



16,928



39,702



5
%Accounts payable and accrued liabilities


25,042



383,572



499,290



9
%Year ended January 31, 2010General and administrative expenses


2,370,156



2,099,476



4,696,936



5
%Other income


12,837



143,178



174,098



9
%Year ended January 31, 2009General and administrative expenses


1,266,827



2,266,655



3,726,591



7
%Other income


65,005



35,132



104,041



5
%











Interest Rate Risk and Equity Price Risk





The Company has been equity financed and does not have any debt that is subject to interest rate change risks.





Commodity Price Risk





While the value of the Company’s Properties is affected by the price of gold, the Company does not have any operating mines and hence does not have any hedging or other commodity based risk respecting its operations.





Item 12.
Descriptions of Securities Other than Equity Securities





Not applicable.








PART II





Item 13.
Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies.





Not applicable.





Item 14.
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds.


Not applicable.


44





Item 15T.
Controls and Procedures.




(a)  Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.




The term “disclosure controls and procedures” (defined in SEC rule 13a-15(e)) refers to the controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within required time periods. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.  Based on such evaluation, and the material weakness described below, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.




(b)  Internal control over financial reporting.




The management of Brazauro Resources Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.  Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of ours Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and effected by our Board of Directors, through our audit committee, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.




All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.




The management of Brazauro Resources Corporation has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2010, and this assessment identified the following material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting:





A deficiency due to a lack of human resources within our finance and accounting reporting functions that could result in material misstatements to financial statements not being detected in a timely manner.Due to the small size of the Company, a single individual is employed to perform all accounting and reporting functions.  An error by that individual or turnover of that individual could result in a material misstatement to financial statements that may not be detected in a timely manner.  Due to budgetary constraints, the Company does not have plans at the current time to hire additional personnel to remediate this material weakness.





To make our assessment of internal control over financial reporting, we used the criteria described in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of January 31, 2010, the company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective.





This annual report does not include an attestation report of the company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Management’s report was not subject to attestation by





45





the company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.




(c)  Changes in internal controls.




There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.







Item 16A.
Audit Committee Financial Expert





Mr. Gregory Chorny is a member of the audit committee of the Company who qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” (as that term is defined in the instructions to Item 16A of Form 20-F) based on his education and experience.  Mr. Chorny is independent, as that term is defined by the rules of the British Columbia Securities Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission.





The Securities and Exchange Commission has indicated that the designation of Mr. Chorny as an audit committee financial expert does not make him an “expert” for any purpose, impose on him any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations or liability imposed on him as a member of the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors in absence of such designation, or affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of the Audit Committee or Board of Directors.








Item 16B.
Code of Ethics.





A formal code of ethics was adopted by the Company on January 29, 2010. The Code of Ethics as required under Item 16B is attached hereto and found in the exhibits following the text of this Annual Report.   Previously, The Board of Directors of the Company (“the Board”) views good corporate governance as an integral component to the success of the Company and to meet responsibilities to shareholders.  The Board has responsibility for the stewardship of the Company including responsibility for strategic planning, identification of the principal risks of the Company’s business and implementation of appropriate systems to manage these risks.  In addition, the Board is responsible for succession planning and the integrity of the Company’s internal controls.  The Board seeks to foster a culture of ethical conduct by striving to ensure that the Company conducts its business in line with high business and moral standards and applicable legal and financial requirements.  In that regard, the Board encourages management to consult with legal and financial advisors to ensure that the Company is in compliance with legal and financial requirements; is aware of the Company’s continuous disclosure obligations and reviews prior to their distribution such material disclosure documents including, but not limited to, the interim and annual financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis; relies on the Audit Committee to review and discuss the Company’s systems of financial controls with the external auditor; and actively monitors the Company’s compliance with the Board’s directives to ensure that all material transactions are reviewed and authorized by the Board before being undertaken by management.








Item 16C.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services








At the annual meeting held on June 12, 2009, the shareholders appointed Morgan & Company, Chartered Accountants (“Morgan”), to serve as the independent auditors for the 2010 fiscal year.  The chart below sets forth the total amount billed by Morgan for services performed in the fiscal years 2010 and 2009, and breaks down these amounts by category of service.




46





Financial Year Ending

Audit Fees


Audit Related Fees


Tax Fees

All Other FeesJanuary 31, 2010

$
54,000


$
7,300


$
4,530

NilJanuary 31, 2009

$
50,000


$
15,480


Nil

Nil





Audit Committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures





The Audit Committee makes recommendations concerning the engagement of public accountants, reviews the scope and results of the audit engagement, considers the range of audit and non-audit fees and reviews the adequacy of internal controls.  Any services provided by Morgan that are not specifically included within the scope of the audit must be pre-approved by the audit committee prior to any engagement.  In fiscal 2010, all fees paid to Morgan for audit and tax services were approved by the audit committee prior to the services being rendered.





Item 16D.
Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees





Not applicable.





Item 16E.
Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers





Not applicable.





Item 16F.
Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant





Not applicable





Item 16G.
Corporate Governance





Not applicable





Item 17.
Financial Statements





The Company’s consolidated financial statements are stated in Canadian dollars and are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP, the application of which, in the case of the Company, conforms in all material respects for the periods presented with United States GAAP, except as disclosed in Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements.





The financial statements and notes thereto as required under Item 17 are attached hereto and found immediately following the text of this Annual Report.  The audit report of Morgan and Company, independent Chartered Accountants, is included herein immediately preceding the consolidated financial statements.





The following is a list of and index to the Consolidated Financial Statements filed as part of this Registration Statement:








BRAZAURO RESOURCES CORPORATION


Index to Consolidated Financial Statements





PageAuditors’ Report - Morgan & Company
50Consolidated Financial Statements:  Consolidated Balance Sheets - January 31, 2010 and 2009
51Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for each of the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
52  47
  Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for each of the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
53Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

for each of the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
54Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
55


All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are either not required under the related instructions, are not applicable, or the information required thereby is set forth in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements or the Notes thereto.





Item 18.
Financial Statements





The Company has elected to provide financial statements pursuant to Item 17.





Item 19.
Exhibits Filed as Part of this Registration Statement.





See the Index to Exhibits following the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.




48





SIGNATURES





The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.


July 9, 2010
BRAZAURO RESOURCES CORPORATION(Registrant)By:
/s/ Mark E. Jones, IIIMARK E. JONES, IIIChief Executive Officer and Director





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.





Signature
Title
Date/s/ Mark E. Jones, III

Mark E. Jones, III*
Chief Executive Officer and Director
July 9, 2010/s/ Patrick L. Glazier

Patrick L. Glazier*
Director
July 9, 2010/s/ Brian C. Irwin

Brian C. Irwin*
Chief Financial Officer and Director
July 9, 2010/s/ Leendert G. Krol

Leendert G. Krol*
Director
July 9, 2010/s/ Gregory Chorny

Gregory Chorny*
Director
July 9, 2010/s/ Dr. Roger David Morton

Dr. Roger David Morton*
Director
July 9, 2010/s/ James J. Komadina

James J. Komadina*
President, COO and Director
July 9, 2010s/ John Segner

John Segner *
Director
July 9, 2010By:  /s/ Mark E. Jones, III

Mark E. Jones, III

Attorney-in-fact

For persons indicated *




49




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
 To the Shareholders of
 Brazauro Resources Corporation
  We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Brazauro Resources Corporation as at January 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
  We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
  In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at January 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.
   Vancouver, Canada
“Morgan & Company”May 13, 2010
Chartered Accountants
   COMMENTS BY AUDITORS FOR U.S. READERS ON CANADA-U.S. REPORTING DIFFERENCES
  The reporting standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when the financial statements are affected by conditions and events that cast substantial doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, such as those described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.  Our report to the shareholders, dated May 13, 2010, is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not permit a reference to such events and conditions in the auditor’s report when these are adequately disclosed in the consolidated financial statements.
  Vancouver, Canada
“Morgan & Company”May 13, 2010
Chartered Accountants


50




Brazauro Resources Corporation
  Consolidated Balance Sheets
  (In Canadian Dollars)
 January 31,2010


2009AssetsCurrent assets:Cash and cash equivalents

$
5,704,919


$
6,021,592Marketable securities (Note 5)


-



211,268Accounts receivable


16,303



166,278Prepaid expenses


26,557



39,702Total current assets


5,747,779



6,438,840Property and equipment:Mineral properties and deferred expenditures (Note 6)


30,138,894



28,809,952Equipment


141,756



137,144Accumulated depreciation


(113,179
)


(78,164
)Total property and equipment, at cost


30,167,471



28,868,932Other assets


6,285



7,295Total assets

$
35,921,535


$
35,315,067Liabilities and shareholders’ equityCurrent liabilities:Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$
753,327


$
499,290Asset retirement obligations


101,913



118,281Note payable, less unamortized discount of $Nil  (2009 - $1,154) (Note 7)


-



1,235,246Total current liabilities


855,240



1,852,817Shareholders’ equityCommon share capital, no par value:Authorized shares - unlimitedIssued and outstanding shares – 92,897,320(2009 - 85,237,621) (Note 8)


86,516,227



82,105,968Contributed surplus


11,939,724



10,105,066Accumulated other comprehensive income


-



27,857Deficit


(63,389,656
)


(58,776,641
)Total shareholders’ equity


35,066,295



33,462,250Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

$
35,921,535


$
35,315,067
  Subsequent events (Note 22)Approved on behalf of the Board of Directors.
Director: “Mark E. Jones, III”Director: “Brian C. Irwin”See accompanying notes.
  51
  Brazauro Resources Corporation
  Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
  (In Canadian Dollars)
 Years Ended January 31,2010


2009


2008Expenses:General and administrative (Note 16)

$
4,696,936


$
3,726,591


$
2,912,367Finance charges


-



37,407



59,789Write-down of mineral properties (Note 6)


-



20,922



684,582Interest


11,563



107,074



177,115Foreign exchange losses (gains)


78,614



(479,756
)


925,5044,787,113



3,412,238



4,759,357Other income:Gain on sale of marketable securities


160,024



-



-Interest income


14,074



93,151



278,206Gain on sale of equipment


-



10,890



-174,098



104,041



278,206Net loss before other comprehensive income


(4,613,015
)


(3,308,197
)


(4,481,151
)Unrealized (loss) income on marketable securities


(27,857
)


27,857



-Comprehensive loss

$
(4,640,872
)

$
(3,280,340
)

$
(4,481,151
)Basic and diluted net loss per share

$
(0.05
)

$
(0.04
)

$
(0.06
)Weighted-average number of shares outstanding


87,126,314



81,054,014



74,836,676
        See accompanying notes.
  52
 Brazauro Resources Corporation
  Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
  (In Canadian Dollars)
 Common Shares





Accumulated Other





TotalNumber


Amount


Contributed

Surplus


Comprehensive Income


Deficit


Shareholders’

EquityBalance at January 31, 2007


53,259,288


$
53,729,055


$
8,176,729


$
-


$
(50,987,293
)

$
10,918,491Issued for cash, net of share issue

cost


9,253,333



7,906,430



-



-



-



7,906,430Issued for property acquisition


13,850,000



13,146,552



-



-



-



13,146,552Stock-based compensation


-



-



465,675



-



-



465,675Issued on exercise of stock

options


75,000



24,691



(11,191
)


-



-



13,500Net loss for the year


-



-



-



-



(4,481,151
)


(4,481,151
)Balance at January 31, 2008


76,437,621



74,806,728



8,631,213



-



(55,468,444
)


27,969,497Issued for cash, net of share

issue cost


8,800,000



8,321,800



-



-



-



8,321,800Warrants modification cost


-



(1,022,560
)


1,022,560



-



-



-Stock-based compensation


-



-



451,293



-



-



451,293Unrealized income on marketable securities


-



-



-



27,857



-



27,857Net loss for the year


-



-



-



-



(3,308,197
)


(3,308,197
)Balance at January 31, 2009


85,237,621



82,105,968



10,105,066



27,857



(58,776,641
)


33,462,250Issued for cash, net of share issue

cost


7,659,699



4,556,623



-



-



-



4,556,623Agent’s warrants cost


-



(146,364
)


146,364



-



-



-Stock-based compensation


-



-



1,688,294



-



-



1,688,294Unrealized loss on marketable securities


-



-



-



(27,857
)


-



(27,857
)Net loss for the year


-



-



-



-



(4,613,015
)


(4,613,015
)Balance at January 31, 2010


92,897,320


$
86,516,227


$
11,939,724


$
-


$
(63,389,656
)

$
35,066,295
 
 See accompanying notes.
  53
  Brazauro Resources Corporation




Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
  (In Canadian Dollars)
 Years Ended January 31,2010


2009


2008Operating activitiesNet loss for the year

$
(4,613,015
)

$
(3,308,197
)

$
(4,481,151
)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in

operating activities:Depreciation


37,205



23,688



21,596Gain on sale of equipment


-



(10,890
)


-Stock-based compensation


1,688,294



451,293



465,675Write-down of mineral properties


-



20,922



684,582Gain on sale of marketable securities


(160,024
)


-



-Interest


1,161



75,378



144,692Changes in non-cash operating working capital:Accounts receivable


135,874



(138,166
)


1,175Prepaid expenses


10,835



64,487



(86,631
)Deferred stock issuance costs


-



-



58,250Accounts payable and accrued liabilities


232,124



(55,356
)


221,545Net cash used in operating activities


(2,667,546
)


(2,876,841
)


(2,970,267
)Investing activitiesMineral properties acquisition and exploration


(1,230,097
)


(3,155,623
)


(4,739,669
)Equipment


(6,803
)


(52,834
)


(15,550
)Proceeds from sale of marketable securities


423,738



-



-Purchase of marketable securities


(96,844
)


(183,184
)


-Net cash used in investing activities


(910,006
)


(3,391,641
)


(4,755,219
)Financing activitiesRepayment of notes payable


(1,235,246
)


(1,005,100
)


-Proceeds from issuances of common shares, net


4,556,623



8,321,800



7,919,930Net cash provided by financing activities


3,321,377



7,316,700



7,919,930Effect of exchange rate changes on cash


(60,498
)


335,237



(402,665
)Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents


(316,673
)


1,383,455



(208,221
)Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year


6,021,592



4,638,137



4,846,358Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

$
5,704,919


$
6,021,592


$
4,638,137
 
 
 See accompanying notes.
 See Note 17 for supplemental cash flow disclosure and non-cash investing and financing activities.
  54
  Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008








1. Operations





Brazauro Resources Corporation (“the Company”) was incorporated in 1986 in British Columbia, Canada, and has been engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties with the potential for economically recoverable reserves.  During fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company pursued gold exploration opportunities that have large scale potential, with prospects in South America as the primary focus.  See Note 6 for further discussion of the Company’s mineral property interests.





The nature of the Company’s operations results in significant expenditures for the acquisition and exploration of properties.  None of the Company’s properties have economically recoverable reserves or proven reserves at the current stage of exploration.  The recoverability of the carrying value of mineral properties and deferred expenditures is dependent upon a number of factors including the existence of recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain financing to renew leases and continue exploration and development and the discovery of economically recoverable reserves.





Going Concern





The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  The Company anticipates that cash and cash equivalents as of January 31, 2010 will be sufficient to satisfy the Company’s cash needs for general and administrative expenses, to pursue further exploration on its existing properties and to acquire and develop additional exploration prospects during fiscal 2011.  These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may be required in the event that the Company is unable to realize its assets and settle its liabilities in the normal course of operations.








2. Significant Accounting Policies





The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“Canadian GAAP”).  All amounts are in Canadian dollars unless noted otherwise.





Principles of Consolidation





The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiary Brazauro Holdings (Brazil) Ltd. (“Brazauro Holdings”), a Canadian corporation, its wholly owned United States subsidiary, Star U.S. Inc. (“Star”), its wholly owned British Virgin Islands subsidiary, Brazauro Holdings (BVI) Ltd., and its wholly owned British Virgin Islands subsidiary, Resource Holdings 2004 (“RH 2004”) from their respective dates of acquisition.  The consolidated financial statements also include the three wholly-owned subsidiaries of Star, Diamond Operations, Inc. (“DOI”), Diamond Exploration, Inc. (“DEI”) and Continental Diamonds, Inc. (“CDI”).  The Company and Brazauro Holdings own 99.99% and 0.01%, respectively, of the common shares of Brazauro Recursos Minerais Ltda. (formerly Jaguar Resources do Brasil Ltda.), a Brazilian corporation. Brazauro Recursos Minerais Ltda. and Brazauro Holdings own 99.99% and 0.01%, respectively, of the common shares of Mineração Cachambix Ltda. (“Cachambix”), a Brazilian corporation.  RH 2004 and the Company own 99.99% and 0.01%, respectively, of the common shares of Empresa Internacional de Mineração do Brasil Ltda. (“EIMB”), a Brazilian corporation.  Significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.




55





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
   2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)





Translation of Foreign Currencies





The Company’s subsidiaries are integrated foreign operations. Foreign currency transactions and balances are translated into the Canadian dollar reporting currency using the temporal method as follows:





a)
Monetary items are translated at the rates prevailing at the balance sheet dates;


b)
Non-monetary items are translated at historical rates;


c)
Revenues and expenses are translated at the average rates in effect during applicable accounting periods, except depreciation, which is translated at historical rates;


d)
Gains and losses on foreign currency translation are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations.





Cash and Cash Equivalents





Cash is comprised of cash on hand and demand deposits.  Cash equivalents are money market instruments with maturity of three months or less.





Fair Value and Classification of Financial Instruments





As of January 31, 2010 and 2009, the fair value of cash and cash equivalents, investments in marketable securities, accounts receivable, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates carrying values because of the short term nature of these instruments.





Marketable Securities





Marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at quoted market value, where applicable, or at an estimate of fair value. Unrealized income (loss) on changes in fair values of available-for-sale financial assets are reflected in other comprehensive income, net of applicable future income taxes. Realized gains and losses are included in the consolidated statement of operations in the period in which they occur.





Mineral Properties and Deferred Expenditures





Direct acquisitions, evaluation and exploration expenditures are capitalized, reduced by related sundry income, to be amortized over the recoverable mineral reserves if a property is commercially developed.  When an area is disproved or abandoned, capitalized expenditures are written down to net realizable value.





Equipment





Equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over useful lives ranging from 2 to 5 years.





Long-Lived Assets





Long-lived assets include mineral properties and deferred expenditures, and equipment. Long-lived assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Carrying amounts are written off to the extent capitalized costs exceed the expected undiscounted net cash flows from their use and eventual disposition proceeds.




56


Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008


2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)





Asset Retirement Obligations





The Company follows the recommendations under Section 3110, “Asset Retirement Obligations”, of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants Handbook (“Section 3110”).  These recommendations require accounting for the estimated fair value of legal obligations to reclaim and remediate mineral properties in the period incurred, at the net present value of the cash flows required to settle the future obligations. The corresponding amount is capitalized to the related asset and accounted for in accordance with the Company’s accounting policies for mineral properties and deferred expenditures. The liabilities are subject to accretion over time for increases in the fair value of the liabilities.





The operations of the Company may in the future be affected from time to time in varying degree by changes in environmental regulations, including those for future removal and site restoration costs. Both the likelihood of new regulations and their overall effect upon the Company vary greatly and are not predictable.  The Company’s estimates of its ultimate asset retirement obligations could change as a result of changes in regulations, the extent of environmental remediation required, the means of reclamation or cost estimates. Changes in estimates are accounted for prospectively from the period the estimate is revised.





Remediation and reclamation expenditures are charged against earnings as incurred. At this stage of the Company’s exploration programs, remediation activities are performed immediately upon completion of each phase of exploration activities.





Income Taxes





Income taxes are calculated using the liability method of accounting.  Temporary differences arising from the difference between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its carrying amount on the balance sheet are used to calculate future income tax liabilities or assets.  The future income tax liabilities or assets are measured using tax rates and laws expected to apply in the periods that the temporary differences are expected to reverse.  Valuation allowances are provided where net future income tax assets are not more likely than not to be realized.





Share Capital – Non-Monetary Consideration





Agent’s warrants, stock options and other equity instruments issued as purchase consideration in non-cash transactions are recorded at fair value determined by management using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  The fair value of the shares issued as purchase consideration for mineral properties is based upon the trading price of those shares on the TSX Venture Exchange on the date of the agreement to issue shares as determined by the Board of Directors.  Proceeds from unit placements are allocated between shares and warrants issued according to their relative fair value using the residual method.





Loss Per Share





Basic loss per share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares issued and outstanding during the year.  The Company follows the treasury stock method in the calculation of diluted loss per share.  No shares were added to the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009, or 2008 for the dilutive effect of employee stock options and warrants as they were all anti-dilutive.




57





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
   2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued)





Stock Based Compensation





The Company uses the fair-value based method to account for all stock-based payments to employees and non-employees granted by measuring the compensation cost of the stock-based payments using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.  Stock options which vest immediately are recorded at the date of grant.  Stock options that vest over time are recorded over the vesting period using the straight line method.  Stock options issued to outside consultants that vest over time are valued at the grant date and subsequently re-valued on each vesting date.  The fair value of the stock-based compensation is recorded as a charge to net earnings based on the vesting period with a credit to contributed surplus.  Upon exercise of the stock options, consideration paid by the option holder, together with the amount previously recognized in contributed surplus, is recorded as an increase to share capital.





Comprehensive Income (Loss)





Comprehensive income (loss) is the change in the Company’s net assets that results from transactions, events and circumstances from sources other than the Company’s shareholders and includes items that would not normally be included in net earnings, such as unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale investments. Other comprehensive income (loss) includes the holding gains and losses from available-for-sale securities which are not included in net income (loss) until realized.





Use of Estimates





The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and related notes to the consolidated financial statements.  Actual results may differ from those estimates.





Measurement Uncertainty





Management’s capitalization of exploration and development costs and assumptions regarding the future recoverability of such costs are subject to significant measurement uncertainty.  Management’s assessment of recoverability is based on, among other things, the Company’s estimate of current mineral reserves and resources which are supported by geological estimates, estimated gold and commodity prices, and the procurement of all necessary regulatory permits and approvals. These assumptions and estimates could change in the future and this could materially affect the carrying value and the ultimate recoverability of the amounts recorded for mineral properties and deferred expenditures.








3. Newly Adopted Accounting Policies





The Company adopted the following provisions of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (“CICA”) Handbook Sections on a prospective basis.  There was no material impact on the Company’s financial condition or operating results as a result of the adoption of these new standards:




58





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008


3. Newly Adopted Accounting Policies (continued)





General Standards of Financial Statement Presentation





Section 1400, “General Standards of Financial Statement Presentation”, includes requirements for management to assess and disclose an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.





Comprehensive Income





Section 1530, “Comprehensive Income”, specifies how comprehensive income is to be reported and presented. Comprehensive income is the change in the Company’s shareholders’ equity that results from transactions and other events from other than the Company’s shareholders and includes items that would not normally be included in net earnings, such as unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale investments. This standard requires certain gains and losses that would otherwise be recorded as part of net earnings to be presented in other comprehensive income until such items are realized.





This standard requires the presentation of comprehensive income, and its components in a separate financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence as the other financial statements. Accumulated other comprehensive income is presented as a new category in shareholders’ equity.





Accordingly, a consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss forms part of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and displays current period net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss).  Other comprehensive income consists of unrealized gains on available-for-sale financial assets.  The cumulative changes in other comprehensive income are included in accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity on the consolidated balance sheet.





Capital Disclosures





Section 1535, “Capital Disclosures”, establishes standards for disclosing information about an entity’s capital and how it is managed, and requires the disclosure of both qualitative and quantitative information that enables users of financial statements to evaluate the Company’s objectives, policies and processes for managing capital.  Under this standard, the Company is required to disclose the following:





·
qualitative information about its objectives, policies and processes for managing capital;


·
summary quantitative data about what it manages as capital;


·
whether during the period it complied with any externally imposed capital requirement to which it is subject; and


·
when the Company has not complied with such externally imposed capital requirements, the consequences of such non-compliance.





Goodwill and Intangible Assets





In February 2008, the CICA Handbook Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”, replaced Section 3062, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”, and Section 3450, “Research and Development Costs”.  This section provides guidance on the recognition of intangible assets in accordance with the definition of an asset and the criteria for asset recognition, clarifying the application of the concept of matching revenues and expenses, whether these assets are separately acquired or are developed internally.




59





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
   3. Newly Adopted Accounting Policies (continued)





Financial Instruments - Disclosures





In June 2009, the CICA Handbook Section 3862, “Financial Instruments – Disclosures”, was amended to require disclosures about the inputs to fair value measurements, including their classification within a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to fair value measurement.  The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:





Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;


Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly; and


Level 3 – Inputs that are not based on observable market data.





The additional disclosure is intended to enable users to evaluate:





·
the significance of financial instruments for the Company’s financial position and performance;


·
the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments to which the Company is exposed during the period and at the balance sheet date; and


·
how the Company manages those risks.





The Company immediately adopted this amended standard in 2010 with no impact on its financial statements.





Financial Instruments - Presentation





Section 3863, “Financial Instruments – Presentation”, enhances financial statement users’ understanding of the significance of financial instruments to an entity’s financial position, performance and cash flows.





Hedges





Section 3865, “Hedges”, specifies the criteria under which hedge accounting is permissible and how hedge accounting may be performed.  As at January 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had not designated any hedging relationships.





Accounting Policy Choice for Transaction Costs





On June 1, 2007, the Emerging Issues Committee of the CICA issued Abstract No. 166, “Accounting Policy Choice for Transaction Costs” (“EIC-166”).  This EIC addresses the accounting policy choice of expensing or adding transaction costs related to the acquisition of financial assets and financial liabilities that are classified as other than as held-for-trading.  Specifically, it requires that the same accounting policy choice be applied to all similar financial instruments, and permits different policy choices for financial instruments that are not similar.  EIC-166 requires retroactive application to all transaction costs accounted for in accordance with CICA Handbook Section 3855, “Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement”.  The Company has evaluated the impact of EIC-166 and determined that no adjustments were required.




60


Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008


3. Newly Adopted Accounting Policies (continued)





Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities





In January 2009, the CICA Emerging Issues Committee issued EIC-173, “Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”.  It requires an entity to consider its own credit risk and the credit risk of the counterparty in determining the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including derivative instruments.  This EIC is applicable retrospectively without restatements of prior periods to all financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in interim and annual financial statements for periods ending on or after January 20, 2009.  Retrospective application with restatement of prior periods is permitted but not required.  The application of incorporating credit risk into the fair value may result in entities re-measuring the financial assets and financial liabilities as at the beginning of the period of adoption, with any resulting difference recorded in retained earnings (deficit), except when derivatives in a fair value hedging relationship are accounted for by the short cut method (the difference is adjusted to the hedged item) and for derivatives in a cash flow hedging relationship (the difference is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income). The Company has evaluated this new section and has determined that the adoption of these new requirements has not had an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.





Mining Exploration Costs





On March 27, 2009, the CICA approved EIC-174, “Mining Exploration Costs”.  This guidance clarified that an entity that has initially capitalized exploration costs has an obligation in the current and subsequent accounting periods to test such costs for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable.  The Company immediately adopted the EIC with no impact on its consolidated financial statements.








4.  Recent Accounting Pronouncements in Canada





The following recently issued accounting pronouncements are applicable to future reporting periods.  The Company is currently evaluating the effects of adopting these standards:





Section 1582, Business Combinations





Section 1582 applies prospectively to the Company’s business combinations on or after January 1, 2011.  Early adoption of this recommendation is permitted.  This section replaces Section 1581, “Business Combination”, and harmonizes the Canadian accounting standards with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).  Under the new guidance, the purchase price used in a business combination will be the new fair value of the shares exchanged at their market price on the date of the exchange.  Currently, when shares are issued, they are valued based on the market price for a reasonable period before and after the date the acquisition is agreed upon and announced.  Under the new guidelines, all acquisition costs are expensed where currently they are capitalized as part of the acquisition costs.  There are also a number of other differences between the new guidelines and current GAAP.  The Company does not expect the adoption of this pronouncement to impact the consolidated financial statements.




61





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
   4. Recent Accounting Pronouncements in Canada (continued)





Section 1601, Consolidated Financial Statements, and Section 1602, Non-Controlling Interests





Section 1601 and 1602 change the accounting and reporting of ownership in interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent.  Non-controlling interests are to be presented in the consolidated balance sheet within equity, but separately from the parent’s equity.  The amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest is to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of operations.  In addition, these pronouncements establish standards for a change in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary and the valuation of retained non-controlling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated.  They also establish reporting requirements for providing sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interest of the non-controlling owners.  These standards apply prospectively to business combinations from January 1, 2011. The Company has evaluated this new section and has determined that the adoption of these new requirements has not had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.





International Financial Reporting Standards





In February 2008, the Accounting Standards Board announced that publicly accountable entities will be required to prepare financial statements in accordance with IFRS for interim and annual financial statements for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011.  The Company is assessing the impact of the conversion from GAAP to IFRS on the financial statements and will develop a conversion implementation plan.








5. Marketable Securities





January 31,2010


2009Cost


Fair Value


Cost


Fair ValueIShares Silver Trust


-



-


$
81,506


$
91,555SPDR Gold Trust


-



-



101,678



119,713-



-


$
183,184


$
211,268





As at January 31, 2009, investments in available-for-sale securities consisted of marketable securities, which had a market value of $211,268.  The carrying amount of these securities were subject to revaluation on a mark-to-market basis at the end of each reporting period, and the increases or decreases arising on revaluation were recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”), a component of shareholders’ equity.





During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010, marketable securities were sold for total proceeds of $423,738.




62





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
   6. Mineral Properties and Deferred Expenditures





The Company cannot guarantee title to all of its properties as the properties may be subject to prior mineral rights applications with priority, prior unregistered agreements or transfers or native land claims, and title may be affected by undetected defects.  Certain of the mineral rights held by the Company are held under applications for mineral rights and, until final approval of such applications is received, the Company’s rights to such mineral rights may not materialize and the exact boundaries of the Company’s properties may be subject to adjustment.  The Company does not maintain title insurance on its properties.





Brazil Properties





Tocantinzinho Properties





In August 2003, the Company entered into an option to acquire exploration rights to a total of 28,275 hectares in the Tapajós gold district in Pará State, Brazil under an option agreement with two individuals (herein referred to as “optionors”).  The option agreement entitled the Company to acquire a 100% interest in the exploration rights to such area (referred to herein as the “Tocantinzinho Properties”) over a four-year period in consideration for the staged payment of $465,000 (U.S.), the staged issuance of 2,600,000 shares of the Company and the expenditure of $1,000,000 (U.S.) on exploration. The Company has made all payments due under the option agreement and has met the requirement to expend $1,000,000 (U.S.) on exploration.





Additionally, the option agreement required the Company to assume all existing obligations of the optionors to certain Brazilian residents in respect of the mineral rights to the Tocantinzinho Properties (the “Underlying Agreements”) totaling $1,600,000 (U.S.) over a four-year period.  The Company has made all payments due under the Underlying Agreements.





In fiscal 2006, the Company received exploration licenses in respect of the central 4,000 hectare area of the Tocantinzinho Properties on which it has been focusing its exploration efforts as well as for a 9,315 hectare area forming the north eastern and eastern boundary of the Tocantinzinho Properties.  Under the option agreement, the Company also holds rights to acquire two other applications for exploration licenses filed with the regulatory authorities in Brazil:  one covering 4,275 hectares that lies to the south of the central 4,000 hectare area and one (the “Extension Area”) covering 10,000 hectares that lies immediately to the east but continues well south of the central 4,000 hectare area.  The mineralized zone discovered by the Company on the Tocantinzinho Properties starts on the central 4,000 hectare area and extends eastward beyond the boundary of the central 4,000 hectare area into the Extension Area.  The Company is subject under DNPM regulations related to periodic renewal requirements for its exploration licenses, and certain of those exploration licenses’ initial three year terms expired during fiscal 2009.  The Company has complied with the renewal requirements on the Extension Area and the 4,275 hectare area, and in February 2009, the Company received the renovation on the exploration license in respect of the central 4,000 hectare area.





During fiscal year 2006, the Company became aware that Talon Metals Corp. (“Talon”, formerly BrazMin Corp.) also had applied for exploration licenses to areas of the Tocantinzinho Properties, including all of the area of the mineralized zone discovered by the Company that lies within the Extension Area.  In response, the Company undertook an extensive review of its title position.




63





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
   6. Mineral Properties and Deferred Expenditures (continued)





Brazil Properties (continued)





Tocantinzinho Properties (continued)





At the end of fiscal 2006, as a result of a title review by the Company, it came to the Company’s attention that a long dormant application for a mining license that covered the Extension Area had never been processed by the Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral (“DNPM”) and was still valid.  According to advice from Brazilian counsel, the dormant application carried paramount title to the Extension Area.  The Company, through its subsidiary, Brazauro Recursos Minerais Ltda. (formerly Jaguar Resources do Brasil Ltda.), reached an agreement (“the Extension Area Agreement”) with the holder of such application, Mineração Cachambix Ltda. (“Cachambix”) to acquire its rights to obtain a mining license over the Extension Area, subject to receipt of confirmation from the DNPM of the continued validity of the application for the mining license and the completion of the assignment of the mining license to Brazauro Recursos Minerais Ltda. The Company made a payment of $150,000 (U.S.) to Cachambix in fiscal 2007 upon execution of the Extension Area Agreement.





In September 2006, the Company entered into an agreement (“the Title Consolidation Agreement”) with Talon whereby the Company would acquire the shares of Talon’s subsidiaries with interests in the area of the Tocantinzinho Properties, being Resource Holdings 2004 Inc. and its subsidiary, Empresa Internacional de Mineração do Brasil Ltda., in exchange for 13,150,000 shares of the Company.





On December 5, 2006, the DNPM published at the Brazilian Official Gazette that the application to which the Extension Area Agreement relates had been confirmed as the paramount title. The Company and Cachambix reached an agreement to modify the Extension Area Agreement in February 2007.  Under this modified agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Cachambix by payment of $850,000 (U.S.) plus its agreement to make two future payments of $1,000,000 (U.S.) each to be made to the former shareholders of Cachambix in February 2008 and 2009.  The Company’s obligation to make the future payments was secured by the Cachambix shares. The Company has made all the payments under the agreement.





In February 2007, under the terms of the Title Consolidation Agreement, the Company acquired Resource Holdings 2004 Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Empresa Internacional de Mineração do Brasil Ltda., from Talon in exchange for 13,150,000 common shares of the Company and payment of $50,000 (U.S.).




The option agreement provides that the Optionors may be entitled to a sliding scale gross revenues royalty ranging from 2.5% for gold prices below $400 (U.S.) per ounce to 3.5% for gold prices in excess of $500 (U.S.) per ounce from production in respect of the mineral rights relating to the applications subject to the option agreement. Effective December 4, 2009, the Company entered into an amending agreement with the Optionors redefining the NSR royalty.  Under the amending agreement, the parties have agreed that the Company can buy down the royalty from 3.5 per cent to 1.5 per cent in two increments of 1 per cent each. The first payment of $2 million will be triggered by certain events including the exercise, if at all, by Eldorado Gold Corp. under its option/joint-venture agreement with the Company to acquire 60 per cent of the Tocantinzinho project, or failing such exercise, by completion of project financing, the making of a production decision or other specified events. The second payment of $3.5 million will be triggered by the making of a construction decision to proceed with the development of the Tocantinzinho project.  The amended royalty will cover all the ground referred to in the original agreement signed with the royalty holders in 2003, which encompasses the entire Tocantinzinho mineralized deposit.




64





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
   6. Mineral Properties and Deferred Expenditures (continued)





Brazil Properties (continued)





Tocantinzinho Properties (continued)





Under a separate option agreement, the Company held exploration permits for an additional 16,052 hectares adjacent to the western border of the above Tocantinzinho Properties.  The Company agreed to make payments totaling $300,000 (U.S.) over a period of approximately four years to an individual as a finder’s fee related to this 16,000 hectare property. This additional property is not subject to the option agreement and therefore is not subject to the royalty.  The Company received an exploration license from the Brazilian regulatory authority with respect to the additional 16,052 hectares in fiscal year 2005, which expired in October 2007.  The Company has applied for a new exploration license.





In July 2008, the Company reached an agreement with Eldorado Gold Corporation (“Eldorado”) and completed a private placement required as part of Eldorado’s earn-in on an option to acquire an initial 60% interest in the Tocantinzinho Properties.  The private placement consisted of the issuance of 8,800,000 units of the Company (the “Units”) to Eldorado at the price of $0.95 per Unit for proceeds of $8,360,000 and is discussed in Note 8 below.





To complete its earn-in of the option to acquire an initial 60% interest in the Company’s Tocantinzinho Properties, Eldorado is required to incur $9.5 million in expenditures on the Tocantinzinho Properties within 24 months or pay the cash equivalent to the Company.  Subject to completing the earn-in, Eldorado will be entitled to exercise the option to acquire an initial 60% in the Tocantinzinho Properties by paying $40 million to the Company. Conditional


upon exercise of the first option, Eldorado will have a second option to acquire a further 10% interest exercisable after a construction decision has been made on the Tocantinzinho Properties by paying an additional $30 million, subject to increase to up to $40 million based on the proven and probable reserves outlined in the feasibility study, and a third option to acquire within two years of the construction decision a further 5% interest (for a total of 75%) by paying a further $20 million.  Eldorado has advised the Company that it has expended in excess of $9.5 million on the Tocantinzinho properties as of September 2009.




On February 25, 2009, the DNPM published in the Brazilian Official Gazette the renewal of the exploration license for the 4,000 hectares related to the central area for an additional period of three years. On May 20, 2009, the DNPM announced the issuing of an extra period of two years for the additional exploration at the 10,000 hectares related to the Extension Area.




Bom Jardim Properties





In fiscal 2007, the Company applied for exploration licenses with the DNPM for a total of approximately 38,096 hectares in Pará State located approximately 190 kilometers southwest of the city of Itaituba. The exploration licenses were granted by the DNPM in September 2007 for a period of three years.





On May 9, 2008, the Company and a third party entered into a letter of intent (“the LOI”) whereby the Company could acquire, subject to certain conditions including the execution of a definitive agreement, the Bom Jardim property consisting of approximately 22,700 hectares of concessions and application areas in the Tapajós region of Pará State, Brazil, subject to the back-in rights described below.  The Company was to issue $1,000,000 in common shares for the Bom Jardim Property.




65





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
   6. Mineral Properties and Deferred Expenditures (continued)





Brazil Properties (continued)





Bom Jardim Properties (continued)





The number of Company shares to be issued to the third party was to be calculated using a deemed price per share equal to the greater of the 30 day Volume-Weighed Average Price prior to closing or the Discounted Market Price (as defined in the TSX Venture Exchange Corporate Finance Manual) on the day prior to the date of the LOI (being $0.48).  The parties agreed to negotiate a definitive agreement governing the terms of the transaction in detail, which was anticipated to be executed during 2009 after the satisfaction of certain conditions of both parties, including board and regulatory approvals of the transaction and satisfactory due diligence.  Completion of the acquisition was conditional on the completion of the reorganization by the third party of the corporate structure within which the Bom Jardim Property is presently held.  On closing, the Company would acquire the subsidiary of the third party that holds all of the outstanding shares (or quotas) of the Brazilian “limitada” in which the Bom Jardim Property was to be held in exchange for the Company shares.





The third party was to have the one-time option, two years after closing the sale of the Bom Jardim Property, to back-in to earn a 60% interest in the Company indirectly holding the Bom Jardim Property by spending on the Bom


Jardim Property, over the next three years, an amount equal to two times the expenditures made by the Company on the Bom Jardim properties from closing to the second anniversary of closing.  If the third party elected not to back-in, the third party was to be entitled to a 2% Net Smelter Return Royalty on the Bom Jardim Property.  If the third party acquired the 60% interest, it would have had the further option to increase its interest to 70% by either completing and delivering a bankable feasibility study in respect of the Bom Jardim Property or by spending a further $10 million on the Bom Jardim Property over the succeeding three year period.  Thereafter, the parties were to contribute proportionately to further expenses.  The Company was to have the option to request the third party to lend to the Company sufficient funds to meet the Company’s share of the cost of placing the Bom Jardim Property into production, in which case the third party’s interest will be increased to 75%.





In January 2009, after efforts to reach a definite agreement were not successful, the Company notified the third party that as contemplated on the LOI, both parties’ obligations were terminated.





Piranhas Properties





In July 2008, the Company entered into an option agreement under which it may acquire the mineral rights to the 19,899 hectare Piranhas Property, located in Pará State, Brazil.  The Company has an option to earn 100% of the Piranhas Property, with no residual production royalty obligations, by payment of a total of BR$1,800,000 (Brazilian Reals) over three years.  An initial payment of approximately US$11,000 was made in July 2008. Advance payments in the amount of approximately US$8,800 were made during fiscal 2010. The remaining payments under the option agreement total approximately BR$1,770,000 and are due as follows (all amounts are in Canadian dollars based on the exchange rate as of January 31, 2010):  $31,000, $63,000, $91,000 and $727,000, due in fiscal years  2011, 2012,  2013 and 2014, respectively.  The Company can terminate the option agreement at any time without further obligation. In November 2009, the Company applied for the exploration licenses to the 19,899 hectare Piranhas Property.




66





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
   6. Mineral Properties and Deferred Expenditures (continued)





Brazil Properties (continued)





Piranhas Properties (continued)





In August 2009, the Company entered into another option agreement under which it may acquire the mineral rights to an additional 7,229 hectare property in the Piranhas area. The property has an exploration license granted by the DNPM in September 2009. The Company has an option to earn a 100% interest in this property, with no residual production royalty obligations, by payment of a total of BR$700,000 over three years. An initial payment of BR$20,000 was made in September 2009. The remaining payments under the option agreement are due as follows (all amounts are in Canadian dollars based on the exchange rate as of January 31, 2010): $23,000, $40,000, and $326,000, due in fiscal years 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. The Company can terminate the option agreement at any time without further obligation.




In December 2009, the Company entered into another option agreement under which it may acquire the mineral rights to an additional 7,404 hectare property in the Piranhas area. The Company has an option to earn a 100% interest in this property, by payment of a total of BR$2,500,000 over three years. An initial payment of approximately $42,000 (BR$75,000) was made in January 2010. The remaining payments under the option agreement are due as follows (all amounts are in Canadian dollars based on the exchange rate as of January 31, 2010): $100,000, $157,000, and $1,128,000, due in fiscal years 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. The vendor will retain a 0.5% net smelter royalty, which the Company can repurchase for BR$3,000,000. The Company can terminate the option agreement at any time without further obligation. In December 2009, the Company applied for the exploration licenses to the 7,404 hectare area in the Piranhas Property.




Agua Branca Property




In August 2009, the Company entered into a non-binding letter of intent with Talon Metals Corp. (“Talon”) to option the Agua Branca property from Talon’s Brazilian subsidiary.  Agua Branca consists of approximately 9,356 hectares of exploration licenses in the Tapajós region of Pará state, Brazil.






The non-binding letter of intent contemplates that, after due diligence by the Company was completed, the parties will enter into a definitive option agreement under which the Company may acquire 100 per cent of the property in consideration for option payments of US$60,000 on signing of the agreement with an additional US$60,000 due upon publication of the exploration licenses by the Brazilian National Department of Mineral Production (“DNPM”) which was expected on or before February 26, 2010 (extended to June 29, 2010), US$130,000 on or before December 31, 2010, and US$1,870,000 in two years from the date of the definitive agreement. To maintain the option, the Company has to spend at least US$500,000 on the property in each of the first two years which includes at least 2,000 meters of core drilling in the first year. In addition, the Company will assume all existing commercial obligations on the property. The vendor will retain a 2% net smelter royalty, which the Company can repurchase for US$2,000,000.






Effective December 10, 2009, the Company and Talon entered into a definitive agreement on the terms described above.




67





Brazauro Resources Corporation





Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


(In Canadian Dollars)





Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
















6. Mineral Properties and Deferred Expenditures (continued)




Brazil Properties (continued)





Crepori Property





In July 2006, the Company entered into an option agreement under which it could acquire the exploration license to the 8,175 hectare Crepori Property, located in Pará State, approximately 220 kilometers from Itaituba.  The Company had an option to earn 100% of the Crepori Property, with no residual production royalty obligations, by payment of a total of $800,000 (Brazilian Reals) over three years.  During fiscal 2008, the Company conducted exploration activities at the Crepori Property, and based upon the results of the exploration results, elected to terminate the option agreement in April 2008.  Accordingly, the capitalized acquisition and exploration costs totaling $576,694 and $20,922 were written off in fiscal 2008 and 2009, respectively, and the Company has no further obligations under the option agreement.





Arkansas Properties





The Company maintained interests in several Arkansas Properties during the period from fiscal 1993 through fiscal 2003.  In December 2002, based upon the cumulative exploration results obtained on the Arkansas Properties, the Company made the decision to cease operations in Arkansas.





The Company recorded a reserve for leasehold reclamation costs during fiscal 2004 of approximately $143,000, representing the estimated costs of the Company’s obligation to restore the Arkansas properties to their original condition   prior  to  lease  expiration  and  to  perform  reclamation  activities  as  required  by  Arkansas  regulatory authorities.  The Company performed reclamation activities during fiscal 2004 to 2007 and expects to complete the restoration during fiscal 2011.










68





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
   6. Mineral Properties and Deferred Expenditures (continued)





Mineral properties and deferred expenditures were as follows:

Balance at

January 31,

2009


Additions


Impaired/

Write-Offs


Balance at

January 31,

2010Brazilian PropertiesTocantinzinho Properties:Acquisition costs

$
20,633,911


$
52,715


$
-


$
20,686,626Exploration costs:Drilling


3,893,127



-



-



3,893,127Field expenses


2,434,516



37,823



-



2,472,339Geological


750,145



23,740



-



773,885Assay


399,414



-



-



399,414Total exploration costs


7,477,202



61,563



-



7,538,765Total Tocantinzinho Properties


28,111,113



114,278



-



28,225,391Bom Jardim Properties:Acquisition costs


72,709



-



-



72,709Exploration costs:Field expenses


232,194



418,574



-



650,768Geological


270,602



99,240



-



369,842Assay


18,516



50,475



-



68,991Total exploration costs


521,312



568,289



-



1,089,601Total Bom Jardim Property


594,021



568,289



-



1,162,310Piranhas Properties:Acquisition costs


11,468



63,166



-



74,634Exploration costs:Field expenses


459



277,707



-



278,166Geological


82,352



40,520



-



122,872Assay


-



17,082



-



17,082Total exploration costs


82,811



335,309



-



418,120Total Piranhas Property


94,279



398,475



-



492,754Agua Branca Property:Acquisition costs


-



63,258



-



63,258Exploration costs:Field expenses


-



142,735



-



142,735Geological


-



9,966



-



9,966Total exploration costs


-



152,701



-



152,701Total Agua Branca Property


-



215,959



-



215,959Other:Acquisition costs


10,539



-



-



10,539Exploration costs


-



31,941



-



31,941Total acquisition costs


20,728,627



179,139



-



20,907,766Total exploration costs


8,081,325



1,149,803



-



9,231,128Total costs

$
28,809,952


$
1,328,942


$
-


$
30,138,894




69


Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008


6. Mineral Properties and Deferred Expenditures (continued)





Balance at

January 31,

2008


Additions


Impaired/

Write-Offs


Balance at

January 31,

2009Brazilian PropertiesTocantinzinho Properties:Acquisition costs

$
20,479,634


$
154,277


$
-


$
20,633,911Exploration costs:Drilling


2,484,341



1,408,786



-



3,893,127Field expenses


1,919,018



515,498



-



2,434,516Geological


620,282



129,863



-



750,145Assay


332,001



67,413



-



399,414Total exploration costs


5,355,642



2,121,560



-



7,477,202Total Tocantinzinho Properties


25,835,276



2,275,837



-



28,111,113Bom Jardim Property:Acquisition costs


34,730



37,979



-



72,709Exploration costs:Field expenses


-



232,194



-



232,194Geological


1,349



269,253



-



270,602Assay


-



18,516







18,516Total exploration costs


1,349



519,963



-



521,312Total Bom Jardim Property


36,079



557,942



-



594,021Piranhas Property:Acquisition costs


-



11,468



-



11,468Exploration costs:Field expenses


-



459



-



459Geological


-



82,352



-



82,352Total exploration costs


-



82,811



-



82,811Total Piranhas Properties


-



94,279



-



94,279Crepori Property:Acquisition costs


-



-



-



-Exploration costs:Field expenses


-



13,086



(13,086
)


-Assay


-



7,836



(7,836
)


-Total exploration costs


-



20,922



(20,922
)


-Total Crepori Property


-



20,922



(20,922
)


-Other:Acquisition costs


692



9,847



-



10,539Total acquisition costs


20,515,056



213,571



-



20,728,627Total exploration costs


5,356,991



2,745,256



(20,922
)


8,081,325Total costs

$
25,872,047


$
2,958,827


$
(20,922
)

$
28,809,952




70





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
   7. Notes Payable





As discussed in Note 6, in February 2007, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase the shares of Cachambix.  The agreement provides for two payments of $1,000,000 (U.S.) each, to be paid in February 2008 and 2009, to the former shareholders of Cachambix.  The Company paid the first payment of $1,000,000 (U.S.) in February 2008, and the second payment of $1,000,000 (U.S.) in February 2009.  The liabilities due under the Cachambix agreement have been recorded as notes payable as follows (all amounts are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise indicated):


January 31,2010

2009Note payable, $1,000,000 (U.S.) face amount, non-interest bearing, due February 6, 2009

$
-


$
1,236,400Less unamortized discount based on imputed interest rate of 7.6%


-



(1,154
)Note payable, current, less unamortized discount

$
-


$
1,235,246





8. Share Capital





The Company’s authorized share capital consists of unlimited number of common shares without par value.





In November 2009, the Company closed a private placement of 7,659,699 units at $0.65 per unit for gross proceeds of $4,978,804.  The Company paid brokerage cash commission on the placement of $308,867 plus additional share issuance costs totaling $113,315.  Each unit consists of one common share and one half of one share purchase warrant.  Each of the 3,829,849 warrants would entitle the holder to purchase one additional common share of the Company at $1.00 until May 3, 2011. Additionally, brokerage agents received 475,180 agent’s warrants, entitling the holder to purchase one additional unit of the Company at $0.65 until May 3, 2011; each unit consists of one common share and one half of one share purchase warrant (the “underlying warrant”), entitling the holder to purchase one additional common share of the Company at $1.00 until May 3, 2011. The fair value of the 475,180 agent’s warrants and 237,590 underlying warrants, $109,135 and $37,229, respectively, were recorded as an increase to contributed surplus and a decrease to common shares and was calculated using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions:  expected dividend yield, 0%; expected volatility, 86%; risk-free interest rate, 1.28%; expected life of warrants, approximately 1.5 years.





As discussed in Note 6, in July 2008, the Company closed a private placement with Eldorado by the issuance of 8,800,000 units of the Company at the price of $0.95 per unit for gross proceeds of $8,360,000.  The Company paid stock issuance costs totaling $38,200.  Each unit consists of one common share and one-half of one non-transferable share purchase warrant.  Each of the 4,400,000 warrants is exercisable to acquire one additional common share at a price of $1.30 per share until January 24, 2010. In January 2009, the Company received approval from the TSX Venture Exchange to amend the 4,400,000 warrants to extend the expiry date to January 24, 2011 and to reduce the exercise price to $1.00. The fair value of the 4,400,000  amended  warrants of $444,738 was recorded as an increase to contributed surplus and a decrease to common shares and was calculated using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions:  expected dividend yield, 0%; expected volatility, 100%; risk-free interest rate, 1.3%; expected life of warrants, 2 years.




71




Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
   8. Share Capital (continued)





In March 2007, the Company closed a private placement of 9,253,333 units at $0.90 per unit for gross proceeds of $8,328,000.  The Company paid brokerage cash commission on the placement of $372,960 plus additional share issuance costs totaling $48,610.  Each unit consists of one common share and one half of one share purchase warrant.  Each of the 4,626,666 warrants would entitle the holder to purchase one additional common share of the Company at $1.60 until March 22, 2008. In February 2008, the Company received approval from the TSX Venture Exchange to amend the 4,626,666 warrants to extend the expiry date to March 22, 2009 and to reduce the exercise price to $1.25. In January 2009, the Company received approval from the TSX Venture Exchange to further amend the 4,626,666 warrants to extend the expiry date to March 22, 2010 and to reduce the exercise price to $1.00. The fair value of the 4,626,666 amended warrants of $577,822 was recorded as an increase to contributed surplus and a decrease to common shares and was calculated using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions:  expected dividend yield, 0%; expected volatility, 97%; risk-free interest rate, 2.2%; expected life of warrants, approximately 1 year.








9. Share Purchase Warrants


During the year ended January 31, 2010, the Company issued 4,542,619 share purchase warrants (2009 – 4,400,000) and as of January 31, 2010, the following share purchase warrants were outstanding:





Number of Share
Purchase Warrants


Exercise

Prices

Expiry

Date4,626,666


$
1.00

March 22, 20104,400,000


$
1.00

January 24, 20113,829,849


$
1.00

May 3, 2011475,180


$
0.65

May 3, 2011237,590


$
1.00

May 3, 201113,569,285





The following table summarizes changes in the number of warrants outstanding:





Warrants


Weighted Average Exercise PriceBalance, January 31, 2007


-



-Issued


4,626,666


$
1.00Balance, January 31, 2008


4,626,666


$
1.00Issued


4,400,000


$
1.00Balance, January 31, 2009


9,026,666


$
1.00Issued


4,542,619


$
0.96Balance, January 31, 2010


13,569,285


$
0.99




72





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
   10. Shareholder Rights Plan





In November 2008, the Company’s board of directors approved the adoption of a Shareholder Rights Plan (the “Rights Plan”).  By an agreement dated May 14, 2009, the Company amended its Rights Plan, and on June 12, 2009, shareholders ratified the Rights Plan, as amended, to maintain it in full force and effect. The Rights Plan, as amended, has an initial term which expires at the annual general meeting of shareholders of the Company to be held in 2012, unless terminated earlier.  The Rights Plan may be extended beyond 2012 by resolution of shareholders at such meeting.




The Rights Plan has been implemented by way of a rights plan agreement (the “Rights Plan Agreement”) which has been designed to protect shareholders from unfair, abusive or coercive take-over strategies including the acquisition of control of the Company by a bidder in a transaction or series of transactions that may not treat all shareholders fairly nor afford all shareholders an equal opportunity to share in the premium paid upon an acquisition of control. The board of directors of the Company (the “Board”) considers that the adoption of the Rights Plan is desirable and in the interests of all of the Company’s shareholders. The Rights Plan Agreement was adopted to ensure equal treatment of shareholders and to provide the Board with sufficient time, in the event of a take-over bid or tender offer for voting shares of the Company, to pursue alternatives which could enhance shareholder value. These alternatives could involve the review of other take-over bids or offers from other interested parties to provide shareholders desiring to sell the Company’s common shares with the best opportunity to realize the maximum sale price for their shares. In addition, with sufficient time, the Board would be able to explore and, if feasible, advance alternatives to maximize share value through possible corporate reorganization or restructuring. The directors need time to consider, and if appropriate, pursue such alternatives.








11. Stock Option Plan





The Company maintains a stock option plan for its directors, officers and employees and may issue up to 13,000,000 options. Under the terms of the plan, the exercise price of each option equals the closing market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant.  Any consideration paid by the optionee on the exercise of options is credited to share capital. Options granted are subject to vesting requirements (generally, 25% on the date of grant and 12.5% on each quarter end thereafter) and have a term of five years.





In April 2009, a total of 2,050,000 options were granted to directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company with an exercise price of $0.55 and an expiration date of April 24, 2014.  In October 2009, a total of 500,000 options were granted to the president of the Company with an exercise price of $0.70 and an expiration date of October 1, 2014. Additionally, in November 2009, a total of 1,000,000 options were granted to the president of the Company with an exercise price of $0.59 and an expiration date of November 25, 2014. In December 2009, a total of 2,355,000 options were granted to directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company with an exercise price of $0.75 and an expiration date of December 15, 2014.  As of January 31, 2010, the Company had a total of 10,701,634 common stock options outstanding at prices ranging from $0.50 to $2.00 with expiration dates from February 2010 to December 2014.




73





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
   11. Stock Option Plan (continued)





The activities in common stock option grants outstanding for the prior three fiscal years were as follows:





2010


2009


2008Number


Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price


Number


Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price


Number


Weighted

Average

Exercise

PriceOutstanding, beginning of year


8,967,526


$
1.15



9,052,000


$
1.16



8,077,000


$
1.34Granted


5,905,000



0.65



500,000



0.51



1,900,000



0.65Exercised


-



-



-



-



(75,000
)


0.18Forfeited


(4,170,892
)


1.11



(584,474
)


0.46



(850,000
)


1.39Outstanding, end of year


10,701,634


$
0.88



8,967,526


$
1.15



9,052,000


$
1.16





The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at January 31, 2010:





Range of

Exercise

Price
Number of

Options

Outstanding
Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price
Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life in Years
Number of
Options

Exercisable
Weighted

Average

Exercise Price

Of Options

Exercisable$0.50 to $0.55
3,720,000
$0.54
3.7
2,926,250
$0.54$0.57 to $0.85
4,655,000
$0.69
4.2
3,842,500
$0.70$1.30 to $2.00
2,326,634
$1.83
0.4
2,326,634
$1.8310,701,634


9,095,384








12. Stock-Based Compensation





Stock-based compensation related to options granted to employees and non-employees increased the following expenses in the consolidated financial statements of the Company in the three years ending January 31, 2010 as follows:





2010


2009


2008Consulting

$
38,833


$
47,980


$
122,683Salaries


1,649,461



403,313



342,992$
1,688,294


$
451,293


$
465,675




74




Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
   12. Stock-Based Compensation (continued)





These amounts have also been recorded as contributed surplus on the consolidated balance sheets.  As of January 31, 2010, the fair market value of the total compensation cost related to nonvested stock options to be recognized upon vesting totals $477,883 and is expected to be recognized in fiscal 2011 and 2012.





The fair value of each option granted has been estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:





2010
2009
2008Expected dividend yield
0%
0%
0%Expected volatility
85-89%
72-82%
69-71%Risk-free interest rate
1.4 to 2.3%
2.2 to 3.1%
4.0 to 4.5%Expected life
3.5 years
3.2 to 3.5 years
2.5 to 3.5 yearsWeighted average fair value

of options granted
$0.34
$0.28
$0.33








13. Income Taxes





A reconciliation of the combined Canadian federal and provincial income taxes at statutory rates and the Company’s effective income tax expense (recovery) is as follows:





Years Ended January 31,2010


2009


2008Statutory rates


30
%


31
%


34
%Income tax at statutory rates

$
(1,384,000
)

$
(1,021,000
)

$
(1,524,000
)Increase in taxes from:Non-deductible items


512,000



149,000



164,000Differences in foreign tax rates


275,000



597,000



904,000Effect of change in tax rate


33,000



100,000



-Benefit of losses not recognized


564,000



175,000



456,000$
-


$
-


$
-





Future income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.  The significant components of the Company’s future tax assets as of January 31 are as follows:





January 31,2010


2009Future income tax assetsOperating loss carryforwards

$
12,170,000


$
12,663,000Property and equipment


128,000



133,000Share issue cost


140,000



112,000Valuation allowance for future tax assets


(12,438,000
)


(12,908,000
)$
-


$
-





75





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
   13. Income Taxes (continued)





The Company has available losses for income tax purposes of approximately $46 million, which may be carried forward and applied against future taxable income when earned.  Brazilian losses are offset by up to 30% of fiscal profits.  United States net operating losses may be limited if more than a 50% ownership change has occurred with respect to any Company included in the consolidated group.  If an ownership change has occurred, such losses are limited on an annual basis to the value of the respective Company on the date of change multiplied by the U.S. federal long-term, tax-exempt rate in effect for the period.  In addition, some U.S. net operating losses may be subject to other limitations based on taxable income from wholly owned subsidiaries on a stand-alone basis.





The losses expire as follows:







Canada


United States


Brazil


Total(in Canadian dollars)2011

$
273,000


$
1,338,000


$
-


$
1,611,0002012


449,000



4,181,000



-



4,630,0002013


-



1,263,000



-



1,263,000From 2016 to 2031


3,843,000



18,453,000



-



22,296,000Indefinitely


-



-



16,325,000



16,325,000$
4,565,000


$
25,235,000


$
16,325,000


$
46,125,000





At January 31, 2010, the Company has incurred approximately $512,000 (2009 - $512,000) of exploration and development costs which may be deducted against future Canadian taxable income subject to certain limitations.







14. Related Party Transactions





During fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company paid consulting fees of $132,000, $127,785 and $181,895 respectively to directors for advisory services, and paid directors’ fees of $159,061, $93,500 and $Nil respectively to directors for advisory services.





Related party transactions were in the normal course of operations and are measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.








15. Contingencies





There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party or to which any of their property is subject.




A legal action was filed against the Company in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Canada, in August 1996 by James M. Cairns relating to a claim by Mr. Cairns for the failure of the Company to make a timely release of escrow shares.  In fiscal 2009, the action was dismissed for lack of prosecution.




76




Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
  16. General and Administrative Expenses





General and administrative expenses consist of the following:





Years Ended January 31,2010


2009


2008Consulting and directors’ fees (Notes 12 and 14)

$
516,553


$
535,856


$
480,774Depreciation


37,205



23,688



21,596Entertainment


66,578



83,877



67,556Insurance


32,364



32,692



34,402Office


169,518



195,931



145,714Professional fees


488,273



633,156



330,903Rent


72,359



46,717



39,984Repairs and maintenance


5,833



9,310



18,645Salaries and benefits (Note 12)


2,860,010



1,426,820



1,336,694Shareholder relations


167,133



471,169



228,917Travel


281,110



267,375



207,182Total

$
4,696,936


$
3,726,591


$
2,912,367








17. Supplemental Cash Flow and Non-Cash Investing and Financing Disclosure





Years Ended January 31,2010


2009


2008Supplemental cash flow disclosure:Interest paid in cash

$
-


$
-


$
-Income taxes paid


-



-



-Non-cash investing activities:Shares and notes payable issued for mineral properties

$
-


$
-


$
15,338,257








18. Segmented Information





Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operation decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.  All of the Company’s operations are within the mineral exploration sector. The Company’s mining operations are centralized whereby the Company’s head office is responsible for the exploration results and for providing support in addressing local and regional issues.  The Company’s mineral properties are located in Brazil.




77




Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
  18. Segmented Information (continued)





Data relating to each of the Company’s reportable segments is presented as follows:





2010


2009Net lossCanada

$
2,339,863


$
930,187USA


1,307,880



1,335,319Brazil


947,817



1,015,855British Virgin Islands


17,455



26,836$
4,613,015


$
3,308,197EquipmentUSA

$
6,974


$
2,117Brazil


21,603



56,863$
28,577


$
58,980Mineral properties and deferred expendituresBrazil

$
30,138,894


$
28,809,952





19. Management of Capital





The Company’s objective in managing capital is to maintain adequate levels of funding to support exploration of its mineral property interests, maintain corporate and administrative functions necessary to support organizational management oversight, and obtain funding sufficient for advancing the Company’s interests.





The Company manages its capital structure in a manner that provides sufficient funding for operational activities. Funds are primarily secured through equity capital obtained in private placements.  There can be no assurances that the Company will be able to continue raising capital in this manner.





The Company has in the past invested its capital in liquid investments. This is to ensure working capital is available to meet the Company’s short-term obligations while maximizing liquidity and returns on unused capital.





Although the Company has been successful at raising funds in the past through the issuance of share capital, it is uncertain whether it will be able to continue this form of financing due to the current difficult conditions.








20. Management of Financial Risk





The Company is exposed to potential loss from various risks including currency risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, market risk and commodity price risk.





Credit Risk





Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents, investments in marketable securities, and accounts receivable.  The Company invests any excess capital in short-term, highly liquid and highly-rated financial instruments such as cash and short-term guaranteed deposits, all held within Canadian financial institutions.




78





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
  20. Management of Financial Risk (continued)





Liquidity Risk





The Company manages liquidity risk by maintaining sufficient cash and cash equivalents balances.  Liquidity requirements are managed based on expected cash flow to ensure there is sufficient capital to meet short-term obligations.





Market Risks





The significant market risks to which the Company is exposed include commodity price risk and interest rate risk.





Commodity Price Risk





The Company’s ability to raise capital to fund exploration or development activities is subject to risk associated with fluctuations in the market price of gold. The Company does not have any hedging or other commodity-based risks respecting its operations.





Market prices for gold historically have fluctuated widely and are affected by numerous factors outside of the Company’s control, including, but not limited to, levels of worldwide production, short-term changes in supply and demand, industrial and retail demand, central bank lending, and forward sales by producers and speculators.  The Company has elected not to actively manage its commodity price risk.





Interest Rate Risk





In respect of financial assets, the Company’s policy is to invest cash at fixed rates of interest in cash equivalents, in order to maintain liquidity, while achieving a satisfactory return.  Therefore, interest rate risk is not significant to the Company.





Foreign Exchange Risk





The Company’s property interests in Brazil make it subject to foreign currency fluctuations and inflationary pressures which may adversely affect the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The Company is affected by changes in exchange rates between the Canadian Dollar and foreign functional currencies. The Company does not invest in foreign currency contracts to mitigate the risks.




79





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
  20. Management of Financial Risk (continued)





At January 31, 2010, the Company is exposed to currency risk through the following assets and liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars and Brazilian Reals.





January 31


January 31US Dollars


Brazilian Reals2010


2009


2010


2009AssetsCash

$
262,624


$
172,503


$
96,153


$
2,596,256Marketable securities


-



170,875



-



-Accounts receivable


1,765



2,172



7,440



283,968Prepaid expenses


4,087



14,336



5,957



5,999LiabilitiesAccounts payable


(40,226
)


(18,440
)


(979,033
)


(845,098
)Asset retirement obligation


(95,666
)


(95,666
)


-



-Note payable


-



(999,067
)


-



-Net foreign currency monetary position

$
132,584


$
(753,287
)

$
(869,483
)

$
2,041,125





Based on the above net exposures at January 31, 2010, and assuming all other variables remain constant, a 10% change in the value of the United States Dollar against the Canadian Dollar would result in an increase/decrease of approximately $14,000 (2009 - $92,000) in net loss from operations and a 10% change in the value of the Brazilian Real against the Canadian Dollar would result in an increase/decrease of approximately $49,000 (2009 - $109,000) in net loss from operations.  During fiscal 2010, the Canadian Dollar strengthened against the United States Dollar by 13% and weakened against the Brazilian Real by 6%.  During fiscal 2009, the Canadian Dollar weakened against the United States Dollar by 23% and strengthened against the Brazilian Real by 6%.








21. Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”)





The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP, which differs in some respects from United States GAAP (“US GAAP”).  The material differences in respect to these financial statements between Canadian and United States GAAP, and their effect on the Company’s financial statements, are summarized below.





Mineral Properties and Deferred Expenditures





Under Canadian GAAP, companies have the option to defer and capitalize mineral exploration expenditures on prospective properties until such time as it is determined that further work is not warranted, at which point property costs would be written off.  Under United States GAAP, all exploration expenditures are expensed until an independent feasibility study has determined that the property is capable of commercial production.  At this stage, the Company has not yet identified economically recoverable reserves on any of its properties.




80





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
  21. Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) (continued)





Mineral Properties and Deferred Expenditures (continued)





The significant differences in the consolidated statements of operations relative to US GAAP were:





Years Ended January 31,2010


2009


2008Net loss in accordance with Canadian GAAP

$
(4,613,015
)

$
(3,308,197
)

$
(4,481,151
)Deduct:Deferred exploration expenditures capitalized during the period


(1,149,803
)


(2,745,256
)


(2,194,762
)Add:Deferred exploration expenditures written off in theperiod


-



20,922



569,950Net loss in accordance with United States GAAP

$
(5,762,818
)

$
(6,032,531
)

$
(6,105,963
)Basic and diluted net loss per share (United States GAAP)

$
(0.07
)

$
(0.07
)

$
(0.08
)Weighted average shares outstanding (United States GAAP)


87,126,314



81,054,014



74,836,676





The significant differences in the consolidated balance sheets relative to US GAAP were:





January 31,2010


2009Shareholders’ equity – Canadian GAAP

$
35,066,295


$
33,462,250Deferred exploration expenditures


(9,231,128
)


(8,081,325
)Shareholders’ equity – United States GAAP

$
25,835,167


$
25,380,925





January 31,2010


2009Mineral properties and deferred exploration expenditures – Canadian GAAP

$
30,138,894


$
28,809,952Deferred exploration expenditures expensed per United States GAAP


(9,231,128
)


(8,081,325
)Acquisition costs of mineral properties – United States GAAP

$
20,907,766


$
20,728,627





81





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
  21. Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) (continued)





Mineral Properties and Deferred Expenditures (continued)





The significant differences in the consolidated statements of cash flows relative to US GAAP were:





Years Ended January 31,2010


2009


2008Net cash used in operating activitiesCanadian GAAP

$
(2,667,546
)

$
(2,876,841
)

$
(2,970,267
)Deferred exploration expenditures


(1,149,803
)


(2,745,256
)


(2,194,762
)US GAAP


(3,817,349
)


(5,622,097
)


(5,165,029
)Net cash used in investing activitiesCanadian GAAP


(910,006
)


(3,391,641
)


(4,755,219
)Deferred exploration expenditures


1,149,803



2,745,256



2,194,762US GAAP


239,797



(646,385
)


(2,560,457
)Net cash provided by financing activitiesCanadian GAAP and US GAAP

$
3,321,377


$
7,316,700


$
7,919,930





Warrants Issued





Under United States GAAP, the fair value of the 3,829,849 (2009 - 4,400,000) warrants issued in the private placement in fiscal 2010 would be recorded as an increase in Warrants of $742,800 (2009 - $340,700) in Shareholders’ Equity as of January 31, 2010, and Common Share Capital would be reduced by $742,800 (2009 - $340,700) as of January 31, 2010.  The fair value of the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions: expected dividend yield, 0% (2009 – 0%); expected volatility, 99% (2009 - 84%); risk-free interest rate, 1% (2009 - 3%); expected life of warrants, 1.5 years (2009 – 1.5 years).





As discussed in Note 8, in fiscal 2009, the Company amended the 9,026,666 warrants outstanding.  Under United States GAAP, the fair value of the amended warrants would increase Common Share Capital by $237,000, decrease Contributed Surplus by $1,022,560, and increase Warrants by 785,560.





The cumulative effects under United States GAAP on Shareholders’ Equity are as follows: Common Share Capital would decrease by $1,328,400 (2009 - $585,600) to $85,187,827 (2009 - $81,520,368), Contributed Surplus would decrease by $1,022,560 (2009 - $1,022,560) to $10,917,164 (2009 - $9,082,506), and Warrants would increase by $2,350,960 (2009 - $1,608,160) to $2,350,960 (2009 - $1,608,160).




82





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
  21. Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) (continued)





Recent Accounting Pronouncements





1.
In March 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”. This statement changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 (the Company’s fiscal year beginning February 1, 2009), with early application encouraged. This statement encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The adoption of these new requirements has not had an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.





2.
In May 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”, which sets out the framework for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with US GAAP. Up to now, the US GAAP hierarchy has been defined in the US auditing literature. Because of the interrelationship with the auditing literature, SFAS 162 will be effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the PCAOB’s amendment to their auditing standards. The adoption of these new requirements has not had an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.





3.
In May 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60”. This Statement clarifies how Statement 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and measurement of premium revenue and claim liabilities. This Statement also requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and all interim periods within those fiscal years, except for some disclosures about the insurance enterprise’s risk-management activities. This Statement requires that disclosures about the risk-management activities of the insurance enterprise be effective for the first period (including interim periods) beginning after issuance of this Statement. Except for those disclosures, earlier application is not permitted. The adoption of these new requirements has not had an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.





4.
In May 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)” (“FSP No. APB 14-1”). FSP No. APB 14-1 applies to convertible debt instruments that, by their stated terms, may be settled in cash (or other assets) upon conversion, including partial cash settlement, unless the embedded conversion option is required to be separately accounted for as a derivative under SFAS 133. FSP No. APB 14-1 specifies that issuers of convertible debt instruments should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. FSP No. APB 14-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. FSP No. APB 14-1 will be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle on periods prior to those presented will be recognized as of the beginning of the first period presented. An offsetting adjustment will be made to the opening balance of retained earnings for that period, presented separately.  The adoption of APB 14-1 is not expected to have a material impact upon the Company’s financial position or results of operations.





83





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
  21. Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) (continued)





Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)





5.
In May 2009, FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events”. The objective of this Statement is to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, this Statement sets forth: 1. The period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; 2. The circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and 3. The disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. In accordance with this Statement, an entity should apply the requirements to interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of these new requirements has not had an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.





6.
In June 2009, FASB issued SFAS No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140”, effective at the start of a company’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009, or January 1, 2010 for companies reporting earnings on a calendar-year basis. The objective of this Statement is to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 140,“Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”.





7.
In June 2009, FASB issued SFAS No. 167,“Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”.The objective of this Statement is to amend certain requirements of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003),“Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”,to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited.





8.
In June 2009, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached consensus on Issue No. 09-1, “Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing” (“EITF 09-1”).This Issue applies to entities that enter into share-lending arrangements on their own shares in contemplation of a convertible debt offering or other financing. This Issue is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years for arrangements outstanding as of the beginning of those fiscal years. The adoption of EITF 09-1 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.





84





Brazauro Resources Corporation
 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 (In Canadian Dollars)
 
 Years Ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
  21. Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) (continued)





Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)




9.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting StandardsCodificationTM(“Codification”) as the single source of authoritative US GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative US GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS 168 and the Codification are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, which corresponds to the Company’s third quarter of fiscal 2010. When effective, the Codification will supersede all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards.  All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. Following SFAS 168, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve only to: (a) update the Codification; (b) provide background information about the guidance; and (c) provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification.  The adoption of SFAS 168 will not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.





22. Subsequent Events





On March 22, 2010, a total of 300,000 common shares were issued as a result of exercise of the same number of stock options with an exercise price of $0.51.





On March 22, 2010, a total of 4,626,666 warrants with an exercise price of $1.00 expired unexercised.





On May 12, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Eldorado Gold Corporation (“Eldorado”), in which Eldorado would acquire, by way of court approved Plan of Arrangement, all the issued and outstanding shares of the Company; and each share of the Company will be exchanged for 0.0675 of a share of Eldorado plus a share of a new exploration company created to hold certain existing assets of the Company.





Through the transaction, Eldorado would acquire the Company’s flagship Tocantinzinho project as well as the Company’s Agua Branca and Piranhas properties. The remaining exploration assets of the Company will become assets of a newly incorporated company and all holders of the Company’s shares, except Eldorado, would receive one share of the new company for each share held of the Company. In addition, Eldorado will provide $10 million in funding to the new company upon the closing of the transaction.





All of the Company’s unexercised options and warrants will be exercisable for Eldorado shares on identical terms, adjusted in respect of exercise price and number, on the same exchange ratio being offered for the shares of the Company.





The Arrangement is subject to approval by holders of 66 2/3% of the Company’s common shares, options and warrants, voting as a single class; and approval by holders of a majority of the Company’s common share, other than Eldorado, who voted at a special meeting of the Company security holders called to approve the transaction.  The Arrangement is also subject to regulatory approval.




85





Index to Exhibits





1.1
Certificate of Incorporation, Memorandum and Articles of Texas Star Resources Corporation (the “Company”) dated March 12, 1986. (a)1.2
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation and Memorandum. (b)1.3
Certificate of Change of Name dated October 30, 1996.1.4
Amendment to the Company’s Memorandum, effective November 27, 2001. (h)1.5
Articles of the Company dated August 11, 2004. (m)4.1
Agreement dated July 28, 1992, between the Company and certain royalty holders (as set forth therein). (a)4.2
Stock Purchase Agreement dated July 29, 1992, by and among the Company, DEI, James M. Cairns, Jr., Gandy Baugh and Stewart Jackson (such individuals being collectively referred to as the “DEI Shareholders”), and the Amendment thereto dated January 13, 1993. (a)4.3
Prospecting Permit and Option to Lease dated November 4, 1992, between DEI and various interest holders. (a)4.4
Agreement dated December 22, 1992, between the Company and certain royalty interest holders. (a)4.5
Royalty Interest Agreement dated January 13, 1993, by and between the Company and the DEI Shareholders relating to the properties of the Company and DEI in Arkansas. (a)4.6
Mining Lease between the Company and certain royalty interest holders dated November 4, 1996. (c)4.7
Amendment No. 1 to Mining Lease between the Company and certain royalty interest holders dated November 1997. (d)4.8
Mining Lease between the Company and ABJ Hammett Estate/ Trust dated September 11, 1997.  (d)4.9
Mining Lease Agreement and Lease Modification and Escrow Agreement dated December 16, 1999. (e)4.10
Letter Agreement dated October 26, 2000 between the Company and McGeorge Contracting Co. (f)4.11
Stripping Agreement dated October 31, 2000 between the Company and McGeorge Contracting Co. (f)4.11
Lease Confirmation Agreement dated effective March 16, 2000. (g)4.12
Mining Lease between the Company and ABJ Hammett Estate/ Trust dated November 15, 2000.  (g)4.13
Trust Deed for Debentures dated February 16, 2001 between the Company and Montreal Trust Company of Canada. (g)4.14
Pledge Agreement for Shares of Star U.S., Inc. between the Company and Montreal Trust Company of Canada dated February 16, 2001. (g)4.15
Pledge Agreement for Shares of Diamond Operations, Inc. between the Company and Montreal Trust Company of Canada dated February 16, 2001. (g)4.16
Second Supplemental Indenture between the Company and Computershare Trust Company of Canada dated February 11, 2003. (i)4.17
Option Agreement, Tocantinzinho Project – Brazil dated July 31, 2003. (j)4.18
Letter Agreement between BrazMin Corp. and the Company dated September 12, 2006 (k)4.19
Quota Purchase Agreement, dated February 5, 2007 among Sabino Orlando Conceição Loguercio, Luiz Antonio Gravata Galvão, Jaguar Resources do Brasil, Mineração Cachambix LTDA, and Brazauro Holdings (Brazil) Ltd. (l)4.20
Letter of Intent between Gold Fields Holdings Company BVI Ltd. and the Company dated May 9, 2008.  (n)4.21
Option agreement dated July 18, 2008 between Maria Teresa Barbosa Da Silva and the Company relating to the acquisition of the mineral rights to the 20,688 hectare Piranha Property. (s)4.22
Option Agreement, between the Company and Eldorado Gold Corporation, dated July 8, 2008. (p)4.23
Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement dated November 28, 2008. (q)4.24
Amendment to Shareholders Rights Plan Agreement dated May 14, 2009. (r)4.25
Financial Advisory Engagement Letter between the Company and BMO signed June 19, 2009. (o)4.26
Option agreement dated August 31, 2009 between Maria Teresa Barbosa Da Silva and the Company relating to the acquisition of  the mineral rights to the 7,229 hectare Piranha Property. (o)4.27
Agua Branca Gold Project Letter of Intent signed August 31, 2009 between the Company and Talon Metals Corporation. (o)4.28
Agua Branca Property Option Agreement signed December 10, 2009 between the Company and Brazmin Ltda.and Talon Metals Corporation. (o)4.29
Agua Branca Royalty Agreement signed December 10, 2009 between the Company and Brazmin Ltda. (o)4.30
Amending agreement dated December 4, 2009 amending the Option Agreement dated July 31, 2003 between the Company and Dennis Moore and Alan Carter with respect to the Tocantinzinho Property, Brazil. (o)4.31
Option agreement dated December 22, 2009 between Marlene Soares Tavares and the Company relating to the acquisition of the mineral rights to the 7,404 hectare Piranha Property. (o)4.32
Arrangement Agreement signed May 11, 2010 between the Company and 0880817 B.C. Ltd. and Eldorado Gold Corporation. (o)4.33
Amendment Agreement dated June 8, 2010 to the Arrangement Agreement dated May 11, 2010 between the Company, 0880817 B.C. Ltd., Eldorado Gold Corporation and Tristar Gold Inc. (o)8.1
Subsidiaries of the Registrant. (o)11.1
Brazauro Code of Ethics (o)12.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14. (o)12.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14. (o)13.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (o)13.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (o)15.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (o)











________________





(a)
Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form 10 as filed on June 23, 1993.(b)
Filed as an exhibit to Form 8 Amendment No. 1 to Form 10 as filed on October 4, 1993.(c)
Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1997 as filed on May 13, 1997.(d)
Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1998 as filed on April 29, 1998.(e)
Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2000 as filed on April 28, 2000.(f)
Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2000 as filed on December 13, 2000.(g)
Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2001 as filed on April 27, 2001.(h)
Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2001 as filed on December 13, 2001.(i)
Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2003 as filed on June 16, 2003.(j)
Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2003 as filed on September 15, 2003.(k)
Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2006 as filed on December 15, 2006.(l)
Filed as an exhibit to Form 8-K as filed on February 12, 2007.(m)
Filed as an exhibit to Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007 as filed on May 25, 2007.(n)
Filed as an exhibit to Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008 as filed on May 29, 2008(o)
Filed herewith.(p)
Filed as an exhibit to Form 6K as filed on July 21, 2008(q)
Filed as an exhibit to Form 6K as filed on December 1, 2008(r)
Filed as an exhibit to Form 6K as filed on May 20, 2009(s)
Filed as an exhibit to Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 as filed on May 29, 2009





All Exhibits referred to in (a) through (s) above were filed with previous Securities and Exchange Commission filings of the Company (File No. 0-21968) and are incorporated herein by reference.