alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Safeguarding American Agriculture

Federal Relay Service

APHIS is an agency of USDA’s Marketing and Regulatory Programs (Voice/TTY/ASCII/Spanish)

 An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer 1-800-877-8339

 

 

March 11, 2008 

VETERINARY SERVICES MEMORANDUM NO. 800.60 

TO: VS Management Team 

 Directors, Center for Veterinary Biologics 

 Biologics Licensees, Permittees, and Applicants 

FROM: /s/ Andrea M. Morgan for John R. Clifford 

 Deputy Administrator 

SUBJECT: Biological Products Returned to Licensed or Permitted Establishments 

I. PURPOSE 

This memorandum provides guidance to licensees and permittees on procedures for 

handling biological products returned to licensed or permitted establishments to ensure 

compliance with Title 9 Code of Federal Regulations (9 CFR) Part 114.11. 

II. CANCELLATION 

This memorandum cancels Veterinary Services (VS) Memorandum No. 800.60, dated 

September 17, 1999. 

III. GENERAL 

The Center for Veterinary Biologics (CVB) acknowledges that licensees and permittees 

may occasionally accept the return of veterinary biological products to the licensed or 

permitted establishment for resale or redistribution. It should be noted that once a 

product has left the licensed or permitted establishment, it is often difficult to determine 

if it has been maintained under proper conditions of storage and handling in compliance 

with 9 CFR 114.11. To ensure that all products that are distributed meet APHIS 

standards, use the following procedures to handle returned products. 

IV. PROCEDURES 

A. Identify and Separate Returned Products - Properly identify all products returned 

to the licensed or permitted establishment and keep them separate from other 

products. 

United States 

Department of 

Agriculture

Animal and Plant 

Health Inspection 

Service 

Veterinary Services 

Washington, DC 

20250 
VETERINARY SERVICES MEMORANDUM NO. 800.60 

Page 2 

B. Resale and Redistribution - Licensees and permittees may ship a returned veterinary 

biological product for resale and redistribution only when adequate documentation is 

available to ensure that the entire quantity of product returned has been handled and 

stored in a uniform, acceptable manner compliant with the regulations and the applicable 

Outline of Production. Preferably, firms should support such documentation by a 

satisfactory retest of the product for potency and submit the results to CVB on the APHIS 

Form 2008. The submitted APHIS Form 2008 should be marked as “Other” in Block 12 

(Disposition by Firm), with the comment that the report is for information. The firm 

should indicate in Block 11 (Remarks) that the testing was performed to support 

redistribution. 

C. Product Not Eligible for Release - Destroy all returned products which do not meet these 

guidelines, since they are not eligible for release for resale and redistribution. See 

Veterinary Services Memorandum 800.56 for acceptable methods of disposal.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form, 10-Q/A-2 (the "Report") of
Amaru, Inc. (the "Company"), for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Leong Hin Chua,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Leong Hin Chua
-------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
August 6, 2010
SERVED: MARCH 13, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 'ir M ) 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS . : i . : .' 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

BUTTE STEEL & FABRICATION, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0199 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011WP700141) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All fliture pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Lonnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative L 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2012-0199 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000^ 

ONE COPY 

Butte Steel & Fabrication, Inc. 

Attn: Jeff Brochheuser, President 

13290 Contractors Drive 

Chico, CA 95973 

TEL: 530-893-1113 

FAX; 530-893-3014 

Christopher Merrill, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7.3 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL; 310-725-7105 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL; 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant/Paralegal 

FAX; 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2 WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
# C_2009205EN.01001103.xml

| 29.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 June 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium.

(Case C-490/08) (1)

1

(Failure of Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2005/68/EC - Reinsurance - Failure to adopt within the prescribed period)

2009/C 205/20

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Yerrell, acting as Agent, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: D. Haven, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to adopt or communicate, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2005/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2005 on reinsurance and amending Council Directives 73/239/EEC and 92/49/EEC as well as Directives 98/78/EC and 2002/83/EC (OJ 2005 L 323, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that by not adopting all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2005 on reinsurance and amending Council Directives 73/239/EEC and 92/49/EEC as well as Directives 98/78/EC and 2002/83/EC or, in any event, by not communicating those measures to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by not adopting all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2005 on reinsurance and amending Council Directives 73/239/EEC and 92/49/EEC as well as Directives 98/78/EC and 2002/83/EC or, in any event, by not communicating those measures to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 10.01.2009.

1

---
# Jefferson - Appalachian Regional Commission

- North Central Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission Executive Director James Chorney Email &#110;c&#x70;r&#x70;&#100;&#x63;&#64;&#x6e;&#99;e&#x6e;t&#x72;&#97;&#x6c;&#46;&#x63;&#111;&#x6d;The post North Central Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
# C_2021431EN.01002201.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/22

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Gera — Germany) — Toropet Ltd. v Landkreis Greiz

(Case C-836/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public health - Health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption - Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 - Article 9(d) and Article 10(a) and (f) - Classification of products - Decomposition, deterioration and presence of foreign bodies in the material - Impact on the initial classification)

(2021/C 431/22)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Gera

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Toropet Ltd.

Defendant: Landkreis Greiz

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(1), Article 9(h) and Article 10(a) and (f) of Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 (Animal by-products Regulation), read in the light of Article 4(2) of that regulation, must be interpreted as meaning that animal by-products originally classified as Category 3 material, in accordance with Article 10(a) and (f) thereof, which are altered by decomposition or deterioration, or mixed with foreign bodies, such as pieces of plaster or sawdust, so that they are no longer fit for human consumption and/or pose a risk to human or animal health, do not comply with the level of risk associated with that classification and must therefore be reclassified into a lower category.

---

(1)  OJ C 87, 16.3.2020.

---
**EXHIBIT10.79**

                                                                                o            Employee’s Copy

                                                                                o            Company’s Copy

**MANUGISTICS GROUP, INC.EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT**

To **Joseph L. Cowan**:

Manugistics Group, Inc.,a Delaware corporation (the “***Company***”),and you are hereby entering into an amendment to your employment agreement withthe Company dated July 21, 2004 and amended on September 23, 2005(the “***EmploymentAgreement***”). Except as set forth below, your EmploymentAgreement remains in full force and effect.

**Compensation**

*FringeBenefits*                     TheCompany will also provide you with or, at your election, reimburse you for, thefollowing:

...

A housingallowance with respect to an executive-level apartment until the earliest of (i) thedate you purchase a residence within commuting distance of the Company, (ii) July 21,2006, or (iii) thirty (30) days after your last day of employment with theCompany, ....

If you accept theterms of this Agreement, please sign in the space indicated below.   We encourage you to consult with any advisorsyou choose to help you understand your obligations under this Agreement.

 

**Signatureson Page Following**

** **

1

----

** **
|        | ** ** | **Manugistics  Group, Inc.** |
|--------|------------|-----------------------------------|
|   |       |                              |   |   |
|   |       |                              |   |   |
|        |       | By:                               |   | /s/ Timothy T. Smith |
|   |       | Name:                             |   | Timothy T. Smith |
|   |       | Title:                            |   | Senior Vice President & General Counsel |

 

 

I accept and agreeto the terms of employment set forth in this Agreement:

 
| /s/ Joseph L. Cowan         |       |
|-----------------------------|------------|
| **Joseph  L. Cowan**        | ** ** |
|                        |       |
| Dated:  April 23, 2006 |       |

 

2

----
OMB Control Na. 2060-0336 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL OPERATING PERMIT, 40 CFR PART 71 APPI.ICATION FORM CTAC - CERTIFICATION OF TRUTH, ACCURACY, AND COMPLETENESS BY RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL
INSTRUCTIONS: One copy of this form must be completed, signed, and sent with each submission of documents (i.e., application fonns, including any updates to applications), and for every document required by a part 71 pertnit (e.g., annual compliance certl6cation, 6-month monitoring reports, progress reports, and notices required by the tenns of a part 71 permit). Responsible Official Identity the responsible oflicial and provide contact information. Name: (Last) 

### Cantwell
_ _ _ _ _ (Firsq _ Dale (Middlc) 

### E Title 

### Vice President - Ogera tion8 _ Street or Post Office Box 

### 1675 B roadway __Suite 1 ~ 

### 50 City _ 

### Denver State _ 

### CO ZIP 

### 80202 Telephone ( 303 ) 534 - 4600 Ext. Facsimile ( 303 623 - 3628

('ertification of'1'ruth, Accuracy and Completeness. "rhe Responsible Official must sign this statement. I certify under penalry of law that based on information and lx licf icd afler reasonable inquiry, the statemcnts and information contain n the 

# ~ ume atc and complete. Name (signed) 

# P*i~~ Name (printed or typed) 

### Dale E_Cantwell _ Date: 

### 03 / 

### 20 / 

### 07
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- Pro-Built Under Contract No. W5J9JE-10-D-0028 APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASB CA No. 593 70

William J. Spriggs, Esq.

Spriggs Consulting Services Lynchburg, VA Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Pietro 0. Mistretta, Esq. Matthew S. Tilghman, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. Army Engineer District, Middle East Winchester, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute which is the subject ofthis appeal having been settled, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 4 April 20 I7
L Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order of Dismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 593 70, Appeal ofPro-Built, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Exhibit 13.2

906 CERTIFICATION

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Zhou Meiyun, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) , as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: September 14, 2017



By:

/s/ Zhou MeiyunName:

Zhou MeiyunTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000856141
<NAME> COOL SPRINGS, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          45,187
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 287,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,123
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     224,726
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   287,849
<SALES>                                        385,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,139
<CGS>                                          408,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  445,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 97,034
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             97,034
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    97,034
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    10.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    10.07
        

</TABLE>
#### Nance Kopel, Appellant, v Lawrence Chiulli, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

— In an action, *inter alia,*for partition of real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered July 7, 1989, which denied her motion to amend her summons, complaint, and notice of pendency.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

*103In 1984 and 1985, the plaintiff and the respondent Lawrence Chiulli, who were engaged to be married, purchased a total of three parcels of property as joint tenants. In October of 1987, the plaintiff commenced the instant action seeking a partition of the property. The respondent alleged that in February 1986 the plaintiff executed a deed transferring her interest in the three parcels to him. In April of 1989, on the eve of trial, and almost two years after the commencement of the action, the plaintiff moved for leave to serve an amended summons and amended complaint against the attorneys for the respondent. The plaintiff alleged that the respondent’s attorney, William Cohen, had informed her that the 1986 deed was of no legal effect and would be destroyed but in fact recorded the deed. The plaintiff also alleged a conspiracy between the respondent, Mr. Cohen, and two other attorneys, Michael Goldberg and Benjamin Platt. Mr. Goldberg had merely notarized the deed while Mr. Platt, whose name appears as a member of the firm with which Cohen was associated, had not practiced law in New York for 20 years, having lived in Florida during that period. The plaintiff’s allegations were made "on information and belief.”

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended summons and amended complaint. As this court has noted, "on the eve of the trial, judicial discretion in allowing such an amendment should be discreet, circumspect, prudent and cautious” *(Alexander v Seligman,*131 AD2d 528). The court properly found that the plaintiff’s proposed amendments would have prejudiced the respondent since they were based on the new theory of a conspiracy between the respondent, his attorneys, and other attorneys to defraud her of her interest in property. To grant the motion may have required the respondent, at this late stage, to hire new counsel since his present attorneys would have become witnesses in the amended action. Moreover, the purported cause of action against Mr. Goldberg lacked any factual or legal basis. Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Hooper, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James J. Maguire, Jr., chief executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

James J. Maguire, Jr.
-------------------------
James J. Maguire, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 14, 2005
1 

### Mears, Gilbert

From: Gail Carpenter <gpersonal@ymail.com>

Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:06 AM

To: Mears, Gilbert Subject: (from a professional realtor) Docket #: EPA-HQ-TRI-2013-0281

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

Mr. Mears,

I implore you to have T.R.I. (Toxic Release Inventory) available to the public as their right to know --- it should not be another exemption for the oil and gas industry.

Every piece of real estate sold in our country involves its own 'environment' - and every buyer/developer purchases the real estate accordingly....

Toxic releases are an enormous factor into such decisi ons and should always be available to the public for those who choose to look into such (similar to sex offenders, etc. - it's public information as it's for the public's awareness and protecti on, as their RIGHT TO KNOW).

'Stationary' industry is at least visible and known to the public who are house-hunting. The fact that the O&G operations are NOT stationary; but quite wayfaring is ONE very good reason the toxic release inventory needs to be public information ....

People (many are my clients) have been selecting ar eas they deem as 'safe/he althy/etc.' for the best
interest of their families' futures. ...and made their largest investment in their homes according to those decisions and locations....only to have these toxic and industrial operations pop up only 500' from their
children's bedrooms.

The lack of such disclosure of gas leases/operations in new construction appalls me - and I'm working on that - but YOU can work on this 'right to know' information now as it's JUST as important as the other concerns (such as sex offenders) I've mentioned above.

Please do the RIGHT thing - and stop enabling the O&G industry from bullying you, from bullying the DEP, from bullying our country into being exempted from all that's important.....and be certain to make the TRI publicly available!

Thank you. Gail Carpenter Mars, PA