alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

 2 p.m. on December 20, 2023.

# PLACE: 

                        This Board meeting will be open to public observation only by webcast. Visit                         *https://www.fdic.gov/​news/​board-matters/​video.html*                         for a link to the webcast. FDIC Board Members and staff will participate from FDIC Headquarters, 550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC.                    

                        Observers requiring auxiliary aids (                        *e.g.,*                         sign language interpretation) for this meeting should email                         *DisabilityProgram@fdic.gov*                         to make necessary arrangements.                    

# STATUS: 

Open to public observation via webcast.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet to consider the following matters:

## Discussion Agenda

Memorandum and resolution re: Proposed 2024 FDIC Operating Budget.

Memorandum and resolution re: Final Rule on FDIC Official Signs and Advertising Requirements, False Advertising, Misrepresentation of Insured Status, and Misuse of the FDIC's Name or Logo.

## Summary Agenda

No substantive discussion of the following items is anticipated. The Board will resolve these matters with a single vote unless a member of the Board of Directors requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.

Disposition of Minutes of a Board of Directors' Meeting Previously Distributed.

Summary reports, status reports, and reports of actions taken pursuant to authority delegated by the Board of Directors.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Direct requests for further information concerning the meeting to Debra A. Decker, Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated at Washington, DC, on December 14, 2023.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

James P. Sheesley,

Assistant Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-28157 Filed 12-18-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
# Nicholas - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Bluegrass Area Development District Executive Director David Duttlinger Email &#x64;&#100;&#117;t&#x74;&#x6c;&#105;n&#x67;&#x65;&#114;&#64;b&#x67;&#97;&#100;d&#x2e;&#x6f;&#114;gThe post Bluegrass Area Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
================================================================================

                                  Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Spirit,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  September  30,  2004 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.



Date:  November 4, 2004

                                                 /s/ Peter Sotola
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                 Peter Sotola
                                                 President, C.E.O. and Director
                                                 (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Connections Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

3.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date:November 12, 2008

| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ BRIAN NEILL        
| |     | BRIAN NEILL            
| |     | Chief Financial Officer
# C_2009141EN.01004101.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/41

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 May 2009 — ars Parfum Creation & Consulting v OHIM (Shape of a spray bottle)

(Case T-104/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark - Shape of a spray bottle - Relative ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Obligation to state reasons - Articles 7(1)(b), 73 and 74(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

2009/C 141/84

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ars Parfum Creation & Consulting GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: A. Späth and G. Hasselblatt, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Pethke, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 November 2007 (Case R 1656/2006-1), relating to the registration as a Community trade mark of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the shape of a spray bottle

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders ars Parfum Creation & Consulting GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders ars Parfum Creation & Consulting GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 107, 26.4.2008.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dresser, Inc. (Dresser) for the period ended March 31,
2005 (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dresser as of the dates and for the periods presented in such Report.



Dated: December 20, 2005



/s/    PATRICK M.
MURRAYPatrick M. Murray Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of VOYAGER PETROLEUM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sebastien C. DuFort, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





DATE: AUGUST 20, 2007

/S/ SEBASTIEN C. DUFORT
--------------------------------------
SEBASTIEN C. DUFORT, PRESIDENT
(PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 723 V

Filed: April 3, 2019

UNPUBLISHED

B ETHANNE HULL

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;
Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Justine Elizabeth Walters , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On May 22, 2018

, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of receiving a Tetanus diphtheria acellular pertussis (“ Tdap ” ) vaccine on May 22, 2016 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in

accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).

2 N ational Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).On April 1, 2019

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent concluded that petitioner’s claim is consistent with a SIRVA as

defined by the V accine Injury Table

. Id. at 3 . Respondent further agrees that petitioner

has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act

. Id. at 4.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
# C_2010011EN.01001001.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/10

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 September 2009 — Alcon Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), *Acri.Tec AG Gesellschaft für ophthalmologische Produkte

(Case C-481/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Community trade mark - Word mark BioVisc - Opposition filed by the proprietor of Community and international word marks PROVISC and DUOVISC - Rejection of the opposition by the Board of Appeal of OHIM)

2010/C 11/16

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Alcon Inc. (represented by: M. Graf, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent), *Acri.Tec AG Gesellschaft für ophthalmologische Produkte (represented by: H. Förster, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) in Case T-106/07 Alcon v OHIM and *Acri.Tec by which the Court of First Instance dismissed an action for annulment brought by the proprietor of the Community and international word marks ‘PROVISC’ and ‘DUOVISC’ for goods in Class 5 against Decision R 660/2006-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 8 February 2005 annulling the decision of the Opposition Division which refused registration of the word mark ‘BioVisc’ for goods in Class 5 in the context of the opposition filed by the applicant

Alcon

OHIM and *Acri.Tec

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Alcon Inc. is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Alcon Inc. is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 24.1.2009.

1

---
================================================================================


                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tari Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the  period  ended June 30,  2007 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
         material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of
         operations of the Company.



Date:  August 15, 2007


/s/ Theodore Tsagkaris

------------------------------
Theodore Tsagkaris
Secretary, Treasurer & C.F.O.
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
# C_2008209EN.01007203.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/72

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 27 June 2008 — Nijs v Court of Auditors

(Case F-1/08) (1)

1

(Staff Case - Officials - Article 35(1)(e) of the Rules of Procedure - Statement of pleas and arguments - Time-limit for complaints - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2008/C 209/133)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bart Nijs (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Rollinger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Communities (represented by: T. Kennedy, J.-M. Stenier and G. Corstens, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

First, annulment of the decision of the Appeals Committee not to promote the applicant to Grade A*11 pursuant to the 2005 promotion year and, second, a claim for damages.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as partly manifestly inadmissible and partly manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as partly manifestly inadmissible and partly manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Mr Nijs is ordered to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Nijs is ordered to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 64, 8.3.2008, p. 68.

1

---
# Hawkins - Appalachian Regional Commission

- First Tennessee Development District Executive Director Chris Craig &#160;Email &#x63;&#x63;&#114;ai&#x67;&#x40;&#102;&#116;d&#x64;&#x2e;&#111;&#114;gThe post First Tennessee Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2513

ELIZABETH MASON FROTHINGHAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DONALD H. RUMSFELD, in his official capacity

as Secretary of the United States of America;

CARL W.S. CHUN, in his official capacity as

Director of the Army Board for Correction of

Military Records for the United States Army;

PETER SCHOOMAKER, in his official capacity as

Chief of Staff for the United States Army; LES

BROWNLEE, in his official capacity as Acting

Secretary for the United States Army; THOMAS

J. ROMIG, in his official capacity as Judge

Advocate for the United States Army; STEVEN

MORELLO, in his official capacity as General

Counsel for the United States Army; PAUL T.

MIKOLASHEK, in his official capacity as

Inspector General for the United States Army,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District

Judge. (CA-04-82-1)

Submitted: April 27, 2005 Decided: May 19, 2005

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
- 2 -

Elizabeth Mason Frothingham, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl

Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Ralph Andrew

Price, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria,

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Dr. Elizabeth Frothingham appeals the district court’s

order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss and motion for summary

judgment in her civil action in which she alleged constitutional

violations and violations of the Administrative Procedure Act in

the denial of her claim for benefits under a military pension

survivor benefit annuity. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Frothingham v. Rumsfeld, No. CA-04-82-1 (E.D.

Va. Nov. 18, 2004). We also deny Frothingham’s motion for oral

argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 23 December 2008 – AES‐Tisza v Commission**

**(Case T-468/08 R)**

Application for interim measures – State aid – Commission decision declaring aid awarded by the Republic of Hungary to certain electricity producers through power purchase
agreements to be incompatible with the common market – Application for suspension of operation – Lack of urgency – Weighing up of interests

1.                     *Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Prima
facie case – Urgency – Serious and irreparable damage – Cumulative nature (Arts 225 EC, 242 EC and 243 EC; Rules of Procedure
of the Court of First Instance, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 10-13)*

2.                     *Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Conditions for granting – Serious and irreparable
damage – Burden of proof – Financial loss (Art. 242 EC; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 104(2)) (see
paras 28-29, 35-39, 42, 45-47)*

3.                     *Applications for interim measures – Conditions of admissibility – Application – Formal requirements – Statement of the pleas
in law establishing a prima facie case for granting the measures sought (Arts 242 EC and 243 EC; Rules of Procedure of the
Court of First Instance, Arts 104(2) and (3) and 109) (see paras 30-31)*

4.                     *Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Conditions for granting – Balancing of all the
interests involved – Decision on State aid (Arts 88(2) EC and 242 EC; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art.
104(2); Council Regulation No 659/1999, Art. 7) (see paras 61-62)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for suspension of the operation of Article 1 of Commission Decision C(2008) 2223 final of 4 June 2008 on the State aid awarded by the Republic of Hungary through power purchase agreements. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The application for interim relief is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Costs are reserved. |
# C_2010221EN.01004401.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/44

---

Order of the General Court of 29 June 2010 — Mauerhofer v Commission

(Case T-515/08) (1)

1

(Multiple framework contract ‘Commission 2007’ - Recruitment of experts in the context of actions relating to aid granted to non-member countries - Tasks requiring expertise - Commission measure relating to the number of billable days’ work - Action for annulment - No challengeable act - Inadmissibility - Action for damages - Causal link - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2010/C 221/72

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Volker Mauerhofer (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: J. Schartmüller, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Boelaert, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for, first, annulment of the Commission’s administrative order of 9 September 2008 amending specific contract 2007/146271, which had been concluded between the Commission and the framework contractor for the project ‘Value Chain Mapping Analysis’ carried out in Bosnia and Herzegovina, by reducing the number of days’ work carried out by the applicant — under a contract between him and the framework contractor — for which the framework contractor could bill the Commission, and second, the award of damages

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Volker Mauerhofer shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Volker Mauerhofer shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009.

1

---