alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4689 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4689

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 2018

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau of 
 Reclamation within the Northport Irrigation District in the State of 
                               Nebraska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EARLY REPAYMENT OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 213 of the Reclamation 
Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390mm), any landowner within the 
Northport Irrigation District in the State of Nebraska (referred to in 
this section as the ``District'') may repay, at any time, the 
construction costs of project facilities allocated to the landowner's 
land within the District.
    (b) Applicability of Full-Cost Pricing Limitations.--On discharge, 
in full, of the obligation for repayment of all construction costs 
described in subsection (a) that are allocated to all land the 
landowner owns in the District in question, the parcels of land shall 
not be subject to the ownership and full-cost pricing limitations under 
Federal reclamation law (the Act of June 17, 1902, 32 Stat. 388, 
chapter 1093), and Acts supplemental to and amendatory of that Act (43 
U.S.C. 371 et seq.), including the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (13 
U.S.C. 390aa et seq.).
    (c) Certification.--On request of a landowner that has repaid, in 
full, the construction costs described in subsection (a), the Secretary 
of the Interior shall provide to the landowner a certificate described 
in section 213(b)(1) of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 
390mm(b)(1)).
    (d) Effect.--Nothing in this section--
            (1) modifies any contractual rights under, or amends or 
        reopens, the reclamation contract between the District and the 
        United States; or
            (2) modifies any rights, obligations, or relationships 
        between the District and landowners in the District under 
        Nebraska State law.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 12, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Carroll - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Three Rivers Regional Commission Executive Director Kirk Fjelstul Email &#x6b;f&#x6a;&#101;&#x6c;&#115;t&#x75;l&#x40;&#116;&#x68;&#114;e&#x65;&#114;&#x69;&#118;e&#x72;s&#x72;&#99;&#x2e;&#99;o&#x6d;The post Three Rivers Regional Commission appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
#### The Bookwalter Steel and Iron Company, appellant, *v.*John P. Stockton, attorney-general, respondent.

On appeal from an order advised by Vice-Chancellor Bird, whose opinion is reported in *Bookwalter Steel and Iron Company’s Case, 6 Dieh. Ch. Rep. 71.*

*Mr. Horatio N. Barton,*for the appellant.

*Mr. William Y. Johnson,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

Order affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

*For affirmance*— The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Magie, Reed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Krueger, Sims, Smith — 12.

*For reversal*— None.
#### Rosemary Peacock, Respondent, v City of Rochester, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff was injured while ice skating at Manhattan Square Park and has alleged that her injuries resulted from defendant’s negligent supervision of a potentially dangerous activity. Defendant has failed to establish as a matter of law that its supervision could not have been negligent *(see, Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs.,*46 NY2d 1065; *Noeller v County of Erie,*145 AD2d 919). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Willis, J.— *629Summary Judgment.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
# C_2018094EN.01003101.xml

| 12.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/31

---

Action brought on 17 January 2018 — Lillelam v EUIPO — Pfaff (LITTLE LAMB)

(Case T-18/18)

(2018/C 094/41)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lillelam A/S (Oslo, Norway) (represented by: N. Köster, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nick Pfaff (Ammanford, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘LITTLE LAMB’ — EU trade mark No 8 121 675

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 November 2017 in Case R 536/2017-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | revoke the EU Trademark No 8 121 675 ‘LITTLE LAMB’ for at least ‘Clothing’ and ‘Accessories for Clothing’ |
| --- | --- |

—

revoke the EU Trademark No 8 121 675 ‘LITTLE LAMB’ for at least ‘Clothing’ and ‘Accessories for Clothing’

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) and Article 18(1) of Regulation No 2017/1001. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) and Article 18(1) of Regulation No 2017/1001.

---
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Dennis P. Calvert, Chief Executive Officer of BioLargo, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report of BioLargo, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of BioLargo, Inc.





Dated: May 16, 2011



By:

/s/ DENNIS P. CALVERTDennis P. CalvertPresident and Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to BioLargo, Inc. and will be retained by BioLargo, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




I, Charles K. Dargan II, Chief Financial Officer of BioLargo, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that the Quarterly Report of BioLargo, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of BioLargo, Inc.





Dated: May 16, 2011



By:

/s/ CHARLES K. DARGAN IICharles K. Dargan IIChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to BioLargo, Inc. and will be retained by BioLargo, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### James Boyd MACKEY, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Walter E. CRAVEN, Warden, Folsom State Prison, Represa, California, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 75-2892.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 22, 1976.

Rehearing Denied March 5, 1976.

*323Richard Tullís (argued), Deputy Atty. Gen., State of California, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent-appellant.

A. Leonard Bjorklund, Jr. (argued), Sausalito, Cal., for petitioner-appellee.

*

 Honorable Warren J. Ferguson, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation.

OPINION

Before BROWNING and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and FERGUSON,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

On April 20,1973, following an evidentiary hearing, the district court found there was a reasonable doubt of Mackey’s competency at the time he entered a plea of guilty to the charge of voluntary manslaughter and that a hearing to determine whether the defendant was competent to plead guilty should have been held in the state court before the guilty plea was accepted. *Pate v. Robinson,*383 U.S. 375, 86 S.Ct. 836, 15 L.Ed.2d 815 (1966); *Moore v. United States,*464 F.2d 663 (9th Cir. 1972). The district court ordered that the state provide a hearing to determine whether the defendant was competent to plead guilty at the time of his plea. A hearing was held in the Marin County Superior Court, and the issue was resolved against Mackey. He now contends in this habeas suit that the wrong standard of competency was applied at that hearing *(see Sieling v. Eyman,*478 F.2d 211 (9th Cir. 1973)). The district court on April 1, 1975, ordered that the case be remanded to the Marin County Superior Court to be reconsidered in light of *Sieiing.*

Whether the state must hold a hearing concerning a defendant’s competency to plead guilty is an entirely different issue from the issue of the standard to be applied in determining whether the defendant was competent to plead guilty. On May 19, 1975, the United States Supreme Court decided *Pitchess v. Davis,*421 U.S. 482, 95 S.Ct. 1748, 44 L.Ed.2d 317, holding that 28 U.S.C. § 2254 requires that state remedies must be exhausted prior to additional federal action on any new claim that develops during proceedings ordered by a federal court to satisfy a different claim on which state remedies have been exhausted. The record does not establish that petitioner has exhausted available state remedies with respect to the standard governing his competency to plead guilty.

The order conditionally granting the writ of habeas corpus is reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
# C_2008171EN.01004002.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/40

---

Action brought on 2 May 2008 — Procter & Gamble v OHIM — Bayer (LIVENSA)

(Case T-159/08)

(2008/C 171/77)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: The Procter & Gamble Company (Cincinnati, United States) (represented by: K. Sandberg, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bayer AG (Leverkusen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 February 2008 in case R 960/2007-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 February 2008 in case R 960/2007-2;

| — | reject the opposition No B 873 978 dated 3 May 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the opposition No B 873 978 dated 3 May 2007;

| — | order OHIM to bear the costs of the proceedings: and |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to bear the costs of the proceedings: and

| — | order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the costs of the proceedings before OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the costs of the proceedings before OHIM.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘LIVENSA’ for goods in class 5 — application No 004 062 725

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The Community trade mark ‘LYVELSA’ for goods in class 5

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the trade mark application in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as there is no likelihood of confusion between the two trade marks subject to comparison.

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 10.14 to IntriCon Corporation Form 10-K dated December 31, 2004




EXHIBIT 10.14  



Summary Sheet for Chief Executive Officer Compensation 



Base Salary 



The current base salary of Mark S. Gorder, the Chief Executive Officer of
IntriCon Corporation (the “Company”) for fiscal 2005 is $275,000. 



Plans and Other Arrangements 



The Chief Executive Officer is also eligible to: 




	  	• 	  	Participate in the 2001 Stock Option Plan; and 




	  	• 	  	Participate in the Company’s broad-based benefit programs
generally available to its salaried employees, including health, disability and life insurance programs, and qualified 401(k)
plan.
# C_2009113EN.01001501.xml

| 16.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/15

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 February 2009 — MPDV Mikrolab GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-17/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(c) - Refusal of registration - Word mark manufacturing score card - Descriptive character)

2009/C 113/29

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: MPDV Mikrolab GmbH (represented by: W. Göpfert, Rechtsanwalt)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 8 November 2007 in Case T-459/05 MPDV Mikrolab v OHIM (manufacturing score card), by which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action for annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 October 2005, which dismissed the appeal against the decision of the examiner refusing registration of the word mark ‘manufacturing score card’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 35 and 42 — Distinctive character of a word mark consisting of words each of which is descriptive of the characteristics of the goods or services concerned

MPDV Mikrolab

OHIM

manufacturing score card

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | MPDV Mikrolab GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

MPDV Mikrolab GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 29.3.2008.

1

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of  FORESIGHT SPECIALISTS, INC.,
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Kevin Ericksteen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Kevin Ericksteen


Kevin
      Ericksteen


Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




Date: July
      23, 2007
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135217 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135217 

 COA: 271013 

Macomb CC: 2000-001355-FC 

ROBERT WILLIAM PANN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 13, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0114 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 22, 2008 

 Clerk
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 18, 2022

No. 04-22-00117-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.G., A CHILD

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-PA-01479

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was originally due to be filed on March 7, 2022. To date, the court 

reporter responsible for preparing the record has neither filed the record nor a notification of late 

record. This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights. 

Consequently, each extension of the deadline to file the reporter’s record must not exceed 10 

days, see TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c); cumulative extensions must not exceed 30 days, absent 

extraordinary circumstances, see id. R. 28.4(b)(2); and this appeal must be disposed of by this 

court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed, see TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. 

Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, we ORDER the court 

reporter to file the reporter’s record in this court no later than March 28, 2022. Requests for 

extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of March, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 121 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1471]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  LIONS CLUBS INTERNATIONAL CENTURY OF SERVICE COMMEMORATIVE COIN ACT

                                 ______
                                 

                               speech of

                      HON. ENI F. H. FALEOMAVAEGA

                           of american samoa

                    in the house of representatives

                       Monday, September 10, 2012

  Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 2139, 
the Lions Clubs International Century of Service Commemorative Coin 
Act. I thank my colleague, Mr. Roskam from Illinois, for introducing 
this bill which would direct the Secretary of Treasury to mint and 
issue $1 coins in commemoration of the centennial of the founding of 
the Lions Clubs International.
  Founded in 1917 by Chicago businessman Melvin Jones, the Lions Club 
has expanded to over 46,000 clubs and 1.35 million members worldwide. 
What began as a national association extended beyond U.S. borders 
within 3 years of founding. Now, nearly a century later, the Lions 
continue to carry out their motto ``We Serve'' in 207 countries, 
touching every corner of the globe.
  In the last century, Lions Clubs International has helped to solve 
problems and serve humanitarian needs on the ground. Their services 
reach the blind, youth, and the elderly and also address health, the 
environment and disaster relief.
  I am especially grateful to the Lions for their dedicated assistance 
to the people of my district in American Samoa. Following the deadly 
2009 tsunami that devastated villages in American Samoa and Samoa, our 
local Lions Clubs were among those that came to the aid of our people. 
The Lions Club of Pago Pago continued to provide relief to many 
residents who lost their eyeglasses during the tsunami. Volunteers 
offered residents eye screening services that included complete eye 
examinations to evaluate visual health and detect eye diseases, 
prescriptions, and referral services. The Apia Lions in Samoa also 
provided assistance through disaster relief shelters and distributed 
donations such as clothing, food, and medicine from international Lions 
Clubs members.
  I am proud to say that the Lions Club of Pago Pago has provided 
consistent services to our people of American Samoa and is a priceless 
asset to our community. I commend the Lions Clubs International and I 
stand in full support of this bill which celebrates and honors a 
century of international leadership in humanitarian service.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4407 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4407

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2018

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 3s101 Rockwell Street in Warrenville, Illinois, as the ``Corporal 
             Jeffery Allen Williams Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORPORAL JEFFERY ALLEN WILLIAMS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3s101 Rockwell Street in Warrenville, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Corporal Jeffery Allen Williams Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Jeffery Allen Williams Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```