alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011038EN.01001002.xml

| 5.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/10

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2010 — E.ON Energie v Commission

(Case T-141/08) (1)

1

(Competition - Administrative procedure - Decision finding that seals had been broken - Article 23(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Burden of proof - Presumption of innocence - Proportionality - Duty to state reasons)

2011/C 38/14

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: E.ON Energie AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: initially A. Röhling, C. Krohs, F. Dietrich and R. Pfromm, then A. Röhling, F. Dietrich and R. Pfromm, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet, V. Bottka and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 377 final of 30 January 2008 imposing a fine under Article 23(1)(e) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 for breaking seals affixed by the Commission during an inspection (Case COMP/B-1/39.326 — E.ON Energie AG)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders E.ON Energie AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders E.ON Energie AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 158, 21.6.2008.

1

---
# C_2008247EN.01001002.xml

| 27.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/10

---

Action brought on 4 August 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-357/08)

(2008/C 247/18)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Zavvos)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/14/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 amending Council Directives 72/166/EEC, 84/5/EEC, 88/357/EEC and 90/232/EEC and Directive 2000/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, or in any event by not notifying those provisions to the Commission, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/14/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 amending Council Directives 72/166/EEC, 84/5/EEC, 88/357/EEC and 90/232/EEC and Directive 2000/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, or in any event by not notifying those provisions to the Commission, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of Directive 2005/14/EC into domestic law expired on 11 June 2007.

---

(1)  OJ L 149, 11.6.2005, p. 14.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Advanced Cell Technology, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, James G. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated:   May 15, 2006 | /s/ JAMES G. STEWART    |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                            | James G. Stewart        |
|                            | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Sanitized – Attachment 014

Page 1 of 1
# C_2010288EN.01003601.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2010 — Companhia Muller de Bebidas v OHIM — Missiato Industria e Comercio (61 A NOSSA ALEGRIA)

(Case T-472/08) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark 61 A NOSSA ALEGRIA - Earlier national word mark CACHAÇA 51 and earlier national figurative marks Cachaça 51 and Pirassununga 51 - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2010/C 288/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Companhia Muller de Bebidas (represented by: G. Da Cunha Ferreira and I. Bairrão, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Missiato Industria e Comercio Ltda (Santa Rita Do Passa Quatro, Brazil)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 July 2008 (Case R 1687/2007-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Companhia Muller de Bebidas and Missiato Industria e Comercio Ltda

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 4 July 2008 (Case R 1687/2007-1). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 4 July 2008 (Case R 1687/2007-1).

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 10.1.2009.

---
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(33-79894,  33-87104, 33-89642, 33-98806,  333-25879,  333-47821) on Form S-8 of
Onsite Energy Corporation of our report dated September 9, 2000, relating to the
consolidated  balance sheet of Onsite Energy  Corporation and subsidiaries as of
June 30, 2000 and the related  statements of  operations,  shareholders'  equity
(deficit) and cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2000 and 1999 which report
appears  in the June 30,  2000  annual  report on Form  10-KSB of Onsite  Energy
Corporation.


/s/ HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP

HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP
Certified Public Accountants


Orange, California
October 10, 2000
Exhibit 32          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFCIER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly Report of TheraBiogen, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we, Kelly T. Hickel, Chief Executive Officer and Robert
Hipple, Manager of CF Consulting, LLC, principal financial officer,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
Material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

December 9, 2008

/s/ Kelly T. Hickel
--------------------------------------
Kelly T. Hickel
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Robert Hipple
--------------------------------------
Robert Hipple, Manager
CF Consulting, LLC
Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 449 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 449

 To require the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service to submit 
 to Congress a report on the effects on public health of the increased 
                    rate of use of synthetic drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2017

 Mr. Jeffries (for himself, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Gowdy, Mr. Collins of New 
  York, and Mr. Butterfield) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service to submit 
 to Congress a report on the effects on public health of the increased 
                    rate of use of synthetic drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Synthetic Drug Awareness Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON EFFECTS ON PUBLIC HEALTH OF SYNTHETIC DRUG USE.

    (a) In General.--Not later than three years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service 
shall submit to Congress a report on the effects on public health of 
the increase since January 2010 in the rate of use of synthetic drugs 
in the United States by individuals who are at least 12 years of age 
but not more than 18 years of age.
    (b) Synthetic Drug Defined.--For purposes of subsection (a), the 
term ``synthetic drug'' means a drug which is developed and 
manufactured to avoid control under the Controlled Substances Act (21 
U.S.C. 801 et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of Matrix Concepts, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the for the three months ended March 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Gary Martin
---------------------------------------------------
Gary Martin
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
February 10, 2006


                                       18
#### People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Doe, Defendant, and Inca Printing and Mailing Corp. et al., Appellants.

— In a proceeding to quash or modify certain sub*116poenas duces tecum, Inca Printing and Mailing Corp. and Realistic Printing Corp., appeal from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Wexner, J.), dated April 15, 1991, which denied their application.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the stay granted by decision and order of this court dated May 7, 1991, is vacated forthwith.

Contrary to the appellants’, contentions, the subpoenas were neither overbroad nor sought irrelevant materials. Moreover, the demand for records covering periods allegedly barred by the Statute of Limitations was proper *(see, All-Waste Sys. v Abrams,*155 AD2d 401; *Matter of Johnson v Keenan,*58 AD2d 755). We have considered the appellants’ remaining contentions and find them either to be unpreserved for appellant review or without merit. Mangano, P. J., Hooper, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23
                     Consent of Dalby, Wendland & Co., P.C.

<PAGE>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the Form 10-KSB of  Tri-County
Bancorp,  Inc.  of our  report  dated  February  6,  1998,  on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Tri-County Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31,
1997 and 1996,  and for the years then  ended,  which  report is included in the
Annual Report.


/s/ Dalby, Wendland & Co., P.C.
Grand Junction, Colorado
March 31, 1998
1 Atkins v. Virginia , 506 U.S. 314 (2002); Hall v. Texas,

537 U.S. 802 (2002).

2 Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002).

3 Penry v. Johnson, 532 U.S. 782 (2001).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 15, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-70041

MICHAEL WAYNE HALL,

Petitioner-Appellant

versus

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth

(06-CV-436)

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

We grant a certificate of appealability on Michael Wayne

Hall’s Atkins claim.1 The case will be scheduled for oral argument

before this panel.

We are not presently persuaded to grant and we defer decision

upon the application for a certificate of appealability on Hall’s

Ring2 and Penry3 claims until after oral argument. The Court does
2

not request but the parties may supplement the Ring and Penry

claims and offer argument, if they wish to do so.

So ORDERED.
# C_2008158EN.01002101.xml

| 21.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/21

---

Action brought on 25 April 2008 — Shenzhen Taiden Industrial v OHIM — Bosch Security Systems (design of communications equipment)

(Case T-153/08)

(2008/C 158/35)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Shenzhen Taiden Industrial Co., Ltd (Shenzhen, China) (represented by: M. Hartmann, M. Helmer, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bosch Security Systems BV (Eindhoven, Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 February 2008 in case R 1437/2006-3; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 February 2008 in case R 1437/2006-3; and

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community design subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: A design for the product ‘communications equipment’ — registered Community design No 214903-0001

Registered Community design subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Proprietor of the Community design: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community design:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community design: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community design:

Design produced as evidence by the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: An earlier design made available to the public by Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV registered as an international design under No DM/055655

Design produced as evidence by the party requesting the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Invalidity Division: Dismissal of the application for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Invalidity Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the decision of the Invalidity Division and declaration that the contested design is invalid

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 63(1) of Council Regulation No 6/2002 as the Third Board of Appeal relied on alleged facts presented by the party requesting the declaration of invalidity for which no evidence was submitted; infringement of Articles 4(1) and 6(1) of Council Regulation No 6/2002 as the Third Board of Appeal erred in holding that the contested design lacked individual character and failed to assess and compare the designs at hand from the point of view of an informed user.

Pleas in law:

---
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 115 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H5525]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           By Mr. PAULSEN:
       H.R. 6232.
       Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant 
     to the following:
       Article 1, Section 8--to provide for the common Defence and 
     general Welfare of the United States.
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of  SHELBY GROUP, INC., (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Kevin Ericksteen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Kevin Ericksteen


Kevin
      Ericksteen


Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




Date: July
      23, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0581 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CATHERINE MARIE RYMAL,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 28, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 21 2022

09/21/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0405
# C_2008223EN.01005903.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/59

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 16 June 2008 — Cyprus v Commission

(Case T-119/08) (1)

1

(2008/C 223/110)

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 7.6.2008.

1

---
# C_2010134EN.01003202.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — Inter-Nett 2000 v OHIM — Unión de Agricoltores (HUNAGRO)

(Case T-423/08) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark HUNAGRO - Earlier Community figurative mark UNIAGRO - Partial refusal to register - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 12 (a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 12 (a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 134/54

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Inter-Nett 2000 Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató kft (Inter-Nett 2000 kft) (Mór, Hungary) (represented by: E. Petruska, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially P. Sipos, subsequently P. Sipos and O. Montalto, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Unión de Agricoltores, SA (El Ejido, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 July 2008 (Case R 71/2008-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Unión de Agricoltores, SA and Inter-Nett 2000 Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató kft.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Inter-Nett 2000 Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató kft (Inter-Nett 2000 kft) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Inter-Nett 2000 Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató kft (Inter-Nett 2000 kft) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 313 of 6.12.2008.

1

---
CALCULATIONS NEEDED FOR ROCISPart I: Information Collection Request14. Annual Cost to Federal Government$47,717Part II: Information Collection Detail9. RespondentsTotal number: 19Small entity number: 010. FrequencyCalculated Annual Frequency: 5.3Calculated Annual Number of Responses: 101161.120879111. Hour and Cost BurdenHours perResponse %of responsesAvg. hours perresponseTotal AnnualHour BurdenCost per Response(Capital/Startup andO&M Costs)Total Annual CostBurden (Capital/Startupand O&M Costs)CommentsReporting 30 0.13 30 3,052 $131 $13,273Recordkeeping 207 0.87 207 20,910Third Party DisclosureTotals 237 237 23,963 $131.42 $13,273.3312. Allocate the change in BurdenTotalRequestedChange Due toNew StatuteChange Due toAgency Decision Due to Agency Estimate Change due to Violation Previously Approved*CommentsAnnual Responses 101-114215Annual Hour Burden 23,963-102,264126,227Annual Cost Burden(Capital/Startup and O&MCosts)$13,273.33* ICR approval had expired and never renewed. This was the original approved level after promulgation of the rule.average annual respondent burden = 1,261G:\USER\SHARE\_CCG\RTR Bins 1&2_august2010\1_Docket\2-KC Review Completed-ready to submit to docket\ICR\Pand R I\P&R I_ICR_Tables 071310.xlsROCIS Inputs10/7/2010
# Tishomingo - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Northeast Mississippi Planning and Development District Executive Director Sharon Gardner Email &#115;&#x67;&#x61;r&#100;&#x6e;e&#114;&#x40;&#x6e;e&#109;&#x70;d&#100;&#x2e;&#x63;o&#109;The post Northeast Mississippi Planning and Development District appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.